alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER ROLAND FENNER, §

TDCJ No. 2207245, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-1397-K

§

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a 

recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed 

the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, 

the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

Signed July 22, 2022.

____________________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01397-K-BN Document 9 Filed 07/22/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 41
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 26315.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 18, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner!

Appellant was convicted for the offense of possessing alcoholic beverages for the purpose of sale, and his punishment was *1011assessed at sixty days in' jail and a fine of $200.

The complaint and information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts and bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

CHARLES EDWARD SCOTT, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00391-O-BP

 §

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, § 

 §

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for 

review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant 

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 

SO ORDERED this 22nd day of June, 2022. 

Case 4:22-cv-00391-O Document 8 Filed 06/22/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 24
lJ.s. t)lsi.t.R l(:1. c()tJR.r \oRTt IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ilJI{N f )tsl]t lcr otr Tl,xAs

I.'ILET) FOR THE NORTIIERN DISTRICT OF

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

JAMES ALLEN REAVES (1),

Defendant.

REPORT AI\ID RECOMMEI\DATION

CONCER}IING PLEA OF GI'ILTY

JAMES ALLEN REAVES (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (sth Ctr.1997),

has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count I of the Indictment.

After cautioning and examining JAMES ALLEN REAVES (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in

Rule I l, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense(s) charged is supported by

an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea

of guilty be accepted, and that JAMES ALLEN REAVES (1) be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. $ 8af(a) and (b)(l)(C)

Posg6ssion with Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found

gudty ofthe offense by the districtjudge, I

I

M The defendant is cunently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

n The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 31a3(aXl) unless the Court finds by clear and

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community

if released.

! The Government does not oppose release.

n The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

n I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under $ 3L42(b) or (c).

The Government opposes release.

The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the

Government.

n The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 3la3(aX2) unless (lXa) the Court finds there is a

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown

under $ 3las(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: October 18,2022.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. $636(bXlXB).

!

n

!

Case 3:22-cr-00091-M Document 35 Filed 10/18/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 77
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-6902-5] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting: consultation on the plans for a longitudinal cohort study of environmental effects on children. 

# SUMMARY:

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing a two-day meeting cosponsored by the Office of Behavioral and Social Science Research (OBSSR) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)/NIH, and the National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The meeting is being convened to discuss the development of a longitudinal cohort study of environmental effects on the health and well-being of children. Content of the meeting will include the status of activities to date, outline of study rationale and plan, issues of longitudinal cohort design, ethical issues, and discussion groups for input and feedback. 

# DATES:

The meeting dates are December 12, 2000, from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., and December 13, 2000, from 8:30 a.m. until 12:30 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting site is the Marriott at Metro Center, 775 12th Street, NW., Washington, DC. The workshop is open to the public, but seating is limited to a maximum of 400. Those planning to attend must register no later than November 29, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

To register as an observer, contact Ms. Kim Brickhouse, TASCON, P.O. Box 30686, Bethesda, MD 20824-0686; telephone: 301-315-9000, ext. 516; facsimile: 301-738-9786; email: kbrickhouse@tascon.com. For further information, contact Dr. Peter Scheidt, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Room 7B05, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892; telephone: 301-496-5064; facsimile: 301-402-2084; e-mail: scheidtp@mail.nih.gov. 

Dated: November 8, 2000.

William H. Farland, 

Director, National Center for Environmental Assessment. 

[FR Doc. 00-29359 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 223 (Friday, November 17, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29432]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: November 8, 2000.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Michele C. Hindi-Alexander, PhD., Scientific 
Review Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4188, MSC 7848, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-3554.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 8, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-29432 Filed 11-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 31.1 CEO CertificationI, David Teckman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Sutura, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 20, 2007   /s/ David Teckman   David Teckman  Chief Executive Officer
#### ANSLEY et al. v. MOODY et al.

No. 10776.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Nov. 27, 1940.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 8, 1941.

Atlas Jones, of Uvalde, and Harry B. Berry, of San Antonio, for plaintiffs in error.

Ditzler H. Jones, of Uvalde, for defendants in error.

NORVELL, Justice.

This is a direct attack in equity seeking to set aside a judgment of the District Court of Uvalde County. The judgment under attack was affirmed by the Beaumont Court of Civil Appeals and writ of error refused by the Supreme Court. We refer to the opinion of the Beaumont Court, Zachry v. Moody, 59 S.W.2d 846, for a statement as to the nature and result of the former suit.

The case is before us upon writ of error, the parties here occupying the same positions as those held by them in the trial court. Plaintiffs are Mrs. Emma Leigh Ansley ' and her husband, J. C. Ansley, and claim under J. H. Zachry, who was a party to the former suit. Defendants in this suit were either parties or privies to parties in the former suit. Unless the pleadings and proof of plaintiffs be sufficient to set aside the former judg*244ment, the doctrine of res judicata -precludes a recovery for plaintiffs.

The facts and circumstances ‘under which a court of equity will grant relief against a judgment upon a direct attack in equity are discussed in United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61, 25 L. Ed. 93. There is no evidence in this case indicating the existence of extrinsic or collateral fraud which would vitiate the judgment under attack. The evidence does hot support any other theory which would authorize the judgment’s being set aside. The action of the trial court in instructing the jury to find for defendants was 'clearly correct, and the judgment based thereon is accordingly affirmed. Crane v. Leon & H. Blum, 56 Tex. 325.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 239 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 239

 To authorize the President to proclaim September 1994 as ``Classical 
                             Music Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 1993

Mr. Yates introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize the President to proclaim September 1994 as ``Classical 
                             Music Month''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,
That the President is hereby authorized and requested to issue a 
proclamation designating September 1994 as ``Classical Music Month'' 
and calling upon the people of the United States to observe such a 
month with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 242

To express the sense of the Congress that if nominated by the Governor

of New York as an estuary of national significance, the Administrator

of the Environmental Protection Agency should select and convene a

management conference under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act

for the lands and waters comprising the South Shore Estuary Reserve

on Long Island, New York.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 21, 1994

Mr. KING (for himself, Mr. LEVY, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. LAZIO, and Mr.

HOCHBRUECKNER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred jointly to the Committees on Public Works and Transportation and Merchant Marine and Fisheries

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Congress that if nominated

by the Governor of New York as an estuary of national

significance, the Administrator of the Environmental

Protection Agency should select and convene a management conference under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act for the lands and waters comprising the South

Shore Estuary Reserve on Long Island, New York.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

•HCON 242 IH

1 SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING SOUTH

2 SHORE ESTUARY RESERVE ON LONG ISLAND,

3 NEW YORK.

4 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of the Con5 gress that if the Governor of the State of New York, in

6 accordance with requirements applicable under section

7 320 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33

8 U.S.C. 1330), nominates the area described in subsection

9 (b) as an estuary of national significance, then the Admin10 istrator of the Environmental Protection Agency should

11 select and convene a management conference for the area

12 under that section.

13 (b) AREA DESCRIBED.—The area referred to in sub14 section (a) is the lands and waters comprising the South

15 Shore Estuary Reserve established by the State of New

16 York, located on Long Island, New York.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 10.17**

**SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR FEES**

**Compensation paid to nonemployee directors**

Annual retainer: $50,000 Annual restricted stock award: $75,000 

Annual stock option grant: $35,000 

**Compensation for attendance at Committee meetings (in person or by phone)**

Audit Committee: $1,250 

Compensation Committee: $1,000 

Nominating and Governance Committee: $1,000 

**Additional Compensation for Board and Committee Chairpersons**

Nonemployee chairperson of the Board: 

Annual Retainer: $35,000 

Annual restricted stock award: $30,000 

Annual stock option grant: $15,000 

Audit Committee (if not Board chairperson): $10,000 

Compensation Committee (if not Board chairperson) $10,000 

Nominating and Governance Committee (if not Board chairperson): $7,500 

Upon a nonemployee director’sinitial election or appointment to the Board on a date other than the date of an annual meeting of stockholders, each such nonemployee director shall automatically be granted a prorated annual option grant and restricted stock award, based on thenumber of full calendar months between the date of initial election or appointment and the date of the first anniversary of the then last annual meeting of stockholders. 

Directors shall be paid cash compensation on a quarterly basis. Directors will also be reimbursed for reasonable Coinstar-related travel expenses.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL A. DAVIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-3164

[July 18, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; John J. Murphy, III, Judge; L.T. Case No.

15015878CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 164 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 164

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
    provide a limitation on the terms of United States Senators and 
                            Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1993

   Mr. Shepherd introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
    provide a limitation on the terms of United States Senators and 
                            Representatives.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. No person shall serve in the United States Congress 
more than two full terms as a Senator or more than six full terms as a 
Representative.
    ``Section 2. Section 1 shall take effect at the beginning of the 
first even-numbered year that begins after the date of the adoption of 
this article of amendment. For the purposes of that section, service 
before that section takes effect shall not be included in computing the 
terms a  person has served.''.

                                 <all>
```