alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 81 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 81

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 1993 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the 
                            Capitol Grounds.





103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 81

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL OLYMPICS TORCH RELAY 
              THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    On May 27, 1993, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may 
designate jointly, the 1993 Special Olympics Torch Relay may be run 
through the Capitol Grounds, as part of the journey of the Special 
Olympics torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics summer 
games at Gallaudet University in the District of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such action as may be necessary 
to carry out section 1.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event authorized by section 1.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCKDIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

P1aintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-034-02-H

CELIA ZURITA,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TTIE IJMTED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GI,JILTY

SO ORDERED.

Dated July 11,2022.

JAMES SLEYHENDRIX

STATES DISTRICT ruDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(bxl), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be irnposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

Case 5:22-cr-00034-H-BQ Document 341 Filed 07/11/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 775
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Kenneth C. Cole, Public Administrator, County of Westchester, as Administrator D. B. N. of the Estate of Katherine A. Drew, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County,

January 14, 1958.

*1046
      *Paul W. Williams, United States Attorney,*for petitioner.

John J. Dillon, S.

The account of the administrator *d. b. n.*was settled by a decree of this court dated August 2, 1955, and such decree directed that the balance of the estate be paid to the Commissioner of Finance of Westchester County “to be held for the benefit of Morgan A. Drew, until further order of this Court ’ ’. The United States of America served a notice of levy upon the Commissioner of Finance pursuant to section 6331 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (U. S. Code, tit. 26), and then instituted the within proceeding to withdraw the fund on deposit in partial satisfaction of its claim for unpaid income taxes against Morgan A. Drew.

A creditor of a beneficiary of an estate is neither a necessary party to an accounting proceeding under section 262 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, nor a person interested in the estate of decedent under subdivision 10 of section 314 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. In *Matter of Riegel*(165 Misc. 265), Surrogate Foley dismissed objections interposed to an accounting proceeding by a creditor of a beneficiary, stating at page 267: ' ‘ The law properly confines the right to compel an accounting or to object to an account to persons legally interested. It excludes from appearance in a proceeding alleged creditors of creditoi s, or of legatees and other classes of beneficiaries.” (See, also, *Duncan*v. *Guest,*5 Redf. 440.)

However, the United States is not in the same position as an ordinary creditor and as was pointed out in *Matter of Rosenberg*(269 N. Y. 247, 251) the Surrogate has jurisdiction to enforce a lien for unpaid income taxes, and “ no policy of this State may interfere with the power of Congress to levy and collect taxes on income.”

The court determines that the United States is entitled to the money being held for the benefit of Morgan A. Drew, and accordingly the application to withdraw such money is granted.

Submit order.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (ECF 

No. 17), filed June 9, 2022. Noting the motion is unopposed, the Court GRANTS the motion.

SO ORDERED on this 9th day of June, 2022.

BRYAN P. SPENCE, TYLER W. STEF, 

RYAN CORCORAN, MITCHELL B. 

PIKE, STEVEN R. HAYNES, ANDREW 

GRIEB, DANIELLE A. RUNYAN,

CHRISTOPHER M. WU, and ALAN 

SOSEBEE, individually and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his official 

capacity as United States Secretary of 

Defense; THE UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; and 

FRANK KENDALL, in his official 

capacity as United States Secretary of the 

Air Force,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Case No. 4:22-cv-00453-O

Case 4:22-cv-00453-O Document 18 Filed 06/09/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 320
Message from the Secretary of the Treasury

Dear Member:

The Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 President’s Budget requests $13.3 billion for Treasury’s operating 

bureaus and $2.3 billion for our International Programs. The proposal identifies investments to 

fairly collect revenue—including a program integrity cap adjustment yielding a net increase of 

$46 billion over the next ten years—and investments that fight terrorism, improve cybersecurity,

and continue strengthening our nation’s long-term economic and fiscal position. 

The request makes strategic investments in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to improve 

service to tens of millions of taxpayers and reduce the deficit through more effective tax 

administration. The IRS collects more than 90 percent of federal revenue and interacts with 

virtually every American. We recognize the increased funding for the IRS in FY 2016 and hope 

it reflects a step back towards providing the resources needed to fulfil its critical mission. 

Despite the increase, the IRS remains severely underfunded; its current operating budget is $911 

million lower than it was in FY 2010. These reductions are costing billions of dollars each year 

in lost enforcement revenue, yielding poor customer service for taxpayers and resulting in 

insufficient investment in the cybersecurity programs necessary to protect taxpayer data from 

illicit access. The FY 2017 request begins to restore these funds and allow the IRS to rebuild the 

quality service that American taxpayers deserve.

Treasury’s request also includes funding to combat the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant 

(ISIL), as well as other international threats, by bolstering our economic sanctions regimes, and 

leveraging intelligence collection and international partnerships. It includes a new centralized 

cybersecurity fund to invest in improved protection for Treasury systems that house taxpayer, 

financial sector and other business, and government data. The request also invests in the 

Community Development Financial Institutions Fund to promote economic development in lowincome and underserved communities.

Treasury’s International Programs request funds general capital increases and replenishments in 

multilateral development banks and continues making progress on reducing our unpaid 

commitments, a top Administration priority. The request also invests in the Office of Technical 

Assistance (OTA) as the first step towards meeting the Administration’s commitment to double 

OTA resources by 2020 and provides investments in the Green Climate Fund to support the 

transition of developing countries to a low-emission and climate resilient development path. 

The FY 2017 Congressional Budget Justification includes the information required for the 

Annual Performance Report. I have validated the accuracy, completeness and reliability of the 

performance data in this report. 

Sincerely,

Jacob J. Lew
EXHIBIT 35.1


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





I, Steven C. McNeal, Vice President and Treasurer of Entergy New Orleans, LLC (the “Servicer”), certify that:





(a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Storm Recovery Property Servicing Agreement dated as of July 22, 2015 between Entergy New Orleans Storm Recovery Funding I, L.L.C., as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.





Date: March 28, 2022


Entergy New Orleans, LLC, as servicer


By /s/ Steven C. McNeal


Name:  Steven C. McNeal


Title:  Vice President and Treasurer
Case 4:22-cr-00141-O Document 13 Filed 05/11/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 21
Case 4:22-cr-00141-O Document 13 Filed 05/11/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 22
Case 4:22-cr-00141-O Document 13 Filed 05/11/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 23
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND ON PAGES 1 THROUGH 3 OF THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                            1001
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    17477
<ALLOWANCES>                                       862
<INVENTORY>                                      95952
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                114992
<PP&E>                                           12365
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4043
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  126327
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            99543
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                       22807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    126327
<SALES>                                         117563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                117563
<CGS>                                           103849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   103849
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  9009
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2062
<INCOME-TAX>                                       832
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1230
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28906]



[[Page 67788]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Region IX Hawaii District Advisory Council; Public Meeting

    The Small Business Administration Region IX Hawaii District 
Advisory Council, located in the geographical area of Honolulu, Hawaii, 
will hold a public meeting at 10 a.m. on Thursday, November 30, 2000, 
at the Business Information and Counseling Center, 1111 Bishop Street, 
Suite 204, Training Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, to discuss such matters 
as may be presented by members, staff of the Small Business 
Administration, or others present. For further information write or 
call Andrew K. Poepoe, District Director U.S. Small Business 
Administration, 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 2-235 Honolulu, Hawaii 
96850; (808) 541-2965.

Bettie Baca,
Counselor to the Administrator/Public Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-28906 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
# L_2013246EN.01S00301.xml

| 17.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 246/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 246/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COMPDENT CORP. FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED 
MARCH 31, 1999 AND 1998, AND THE YEARS ENDED 1998, 1997, AND 1996 AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10K FOR DECEMBER 31, 
1998 AND FORM 10Q FOR MARCH 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,323
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,173
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,462
<PP&E>                                          16,375
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,203
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,857
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   154,203
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,172
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    19
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 771
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,435
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,872
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,563
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,563
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
#### PARKER v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 6, 1953.

Caswell P. Lane, Mt. Sterling, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Squire N. Williams, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

CAMMACK, Justice.

George Parker was sentenced to five years in prison on a charge of robbery. On this appeal he is insisting that the judgment should be reversed because the lower court erred in refusing td grant him a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.

The prosecuting witness, Arnold Whitt, said that, while he, Parker and others were lodged in the 'Montgomery County jail, Parker and an unidentified person beat him and robbed him of a 17 jewel Benrus watch. Whitt’s father and Frankie Martin, who were also in jail at the time of the alleged offense, corroborated Whitt’s testimony^ Martin, said also that Parker attempted to sell him Whitt’s watch ■ the next day. In support of his motion for a new trial, Parker filed his own affidavit and that of Clifton Chambers. Chambers ' said that about three weeks after Whitt and the others were in jail he was cleaning a cell therein and found a Benrus wrist watch among some newspapers which matched the description of the one reported'to have been stolen from Whitt.

Parker’s affidavit merely recited his conviction, the testimony of Martin -and that Clifton Chambers had found a Benrus watch in the jail. He.did not say.that, by the exercise of due diligence, the newly dis.covered evidence could not have been obtained before the trial. Nor did he say that any effort had been made to search the jail before the trial.' Thus' one' of the essential elements of" an affidavit in support of a new trial was omitted. Spurlock *1004v. Commonwealth, 311 Ky. 238, 223 S.W.2d 910, and cases cited therein. _ Furthermore, the main effect of Chambers’ statement, that he found a Benrus watch while- cleaning the jail would have been to impeach the testimony of Frankie Martin;. Martin having said that Parker had offered to sell him Whitt’s watch.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 35.4





Officer’s
Certificate



Pursuant
to the requirements of the applicable Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, for which Midland
Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC, as Servicer,
the undersigned, Ellen D. Miller, as Managing Director and Head of Servicing of Berkeley Point Capital LLC, hereby certifies subject
to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, solely in her capacity as an officer and not in her individual
capacity, as follows:

| | 1. | A
                                         review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting
                                         Period”) and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision;
                                         and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To
                                         the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
                                         obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 1st day of March, 2016.



Berkeley
Point Capital LLC





/s/
Ellen D. Miller

Ellen
D. Miller

Managing
Director, Head of Servicing









Schedule
I



Multifamily
Pass-Through Certificates, Berkeley Point Capital LLC as Sub-Servicer:



Series
2009-K4

Series
2010-K5

Series
2011-K10

Series
2011-K12

Series
2012-K709

Series
2012-KF01

Series
2013-K24

Series
2013-KF02

Series
2014-KF03

Series
2014-K503

Series
2014-KF06

Series
2015-KF07

Series
2015-KF08

Series
2015-KF09

Series
2015-KF10

Series
2015-KF12



Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital LLC as Primary Servicer:



COMM
2014-CCRE17 Mortgage Trust

COMM
2014-CCRE19 Mortgage Trust

GS
Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-GC24

COMM
2014-UBS4 Mortgage Trust

COMM
2015-CCRE23 Mortgage Trust

COMM
2015-CCRE27 Mortgage Trust

GS
Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-GC30

COMM
2015-HULA

COMM
2015-LC19 Mortgage Trust

COMM
2015-LC21 Mortgage Trust

GS
Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-GS1