58352 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 183 / Thursday, September 20, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

(iii) A garment contains several fibers, 

fabrics, or components not previously 

used together; or 

* * * * * 

(5) Reliable evidence of current 

technical literature, past experience, or 

industry expertise supporting the care 

information on the label [For example, 

if past experience with particular dyes 

and fabrics indicates that a particular 

red trim does not bleed onto 

surrounding fabric, testing the entire 

garment might not be necessary]; or 

* * * * * 

5. Amend § 423.8 by revising 

paragraph (g) as follows: 

§ 423.8 Exemptions. 

* * * * * 

(g) The symbol systems developed by 

ASTM International (ASTM) and 

designated as ASTM D5489–07, 

‘‘Standard Guide for Care Symbols for 

Care Instructions on Textile Products’’ 

and by the International Organization 

for Standardization (ISO) and 

designated as 3758:2005(E), ‘‘Textiles— 

Care labelling code using symbols,’’ may 

be used on care labels or care 

instructions in lieu of terms so long as 

the symbols fulfill the requirements of 

this part. If the ISO symbols are used, 

the label should disclose this fact. In 

addition, symbols from either one of the 

two symbol systems above may be 

combined with terms so long as the 

symbols and terms used fulfill the 

requirements of this part. This 

incorporation by reference was 

approved by the Director of the Federal 

Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies of 

ASTM D5489–07, ‘‘Standard Guide for 

Care Symbols for Care Instructions on 

Textile Products,’’ may be obtained from 

ASTM, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West 

Conshohocken, PA 19428. Copies of ISO 

3758:2005(E), ‘‘Textiles—Care labelling 

code using symbols,’’ may be obtained 

from American National Standards 

Institute, 11 West 42nd Street, 13th 

Floor, New York, NY 10036. Both 

ASTM D5489–07 and ISO 3758:2005(E) 

may be inspected at the Federal Trade 

Commission, room 130, 600 

Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC or at the National Archives and 

Records Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, 

or go to http://www.archives.gov/ 

federal_register/ 

code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

* * * * * 

6. Amend Appendix A by revising 

paragraph 7.a and c, and by adding a 

new paragraph 9.a, to read as follows: 

Appendix A to Part 423—Glossary of 

Standard Terms 

* * * * * 

7. Drycleaning; All Procedures: 

a. ‘‘Dryclean’’—a commercial process by 

which soil is removed from products or 

specimens in a machine which uses any 

solvent excluding water (e.g., petroleum, 

perchloroethylene, silicone, glycol ether, 

carbon dioxide, or aldehyde). The process 

also may involve adding moisture to the 

solvent, up to 75% relative humidity, hot 

tumble drying up to 160 degrees F (71 

degrees C) and restoration by steam press or 

steam-air finishing. 

* * * * * 

c. ‘‘Petroleum,’’ ‘‘Perchloroethylene,’’ 

‘‘Silicone,’’ ‘‘Glycol Ether,’’ ‘‘Carbon 

Dioxide,’’ or ‘‘Aldehyde’’—employ solvent(s) 

specified to dryclean the item. 

* * * * * 

9. Professional Wetcleaning: 

a. ‘‘Wetclean’’—a commercial process for 

cleaning products or specimens in water 

carried out by professionals using special 

technology (cleaning, rinsing, and spinning), 

detergents, and additives to minimize 

adverse effects, followed by appropriate 

drying and restorative finishing procedures. 

By direction of the Commission. 

Donald S. Clark, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–22746 Filed 9–19–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6750–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2012–0596; FRL 9731–2] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; State of 

Missouri 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revision submitted by the state of 

Missouri on September 21, 2010. This 

revision proposes to amend the ambient 

air quality standards table to reflect 

revised National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards (NAAQS), update reference 

methods associated with the revised 

NAAQS, and update the breakpoint 

values for the Air Quality Index. These 

revisions would make Missouri’s rules 

consistent with Federal regulations and 

improve the clarity of the rules. 

DATES: Comments on this proposed 

action must be received in writing by 

October 22, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2012–0596, by mail to Amy 

Bhesania, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas 

City, Kansas 66101. Comments may also 

be submitted electronically or through 

hand delivery/courier by following the 

detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES

section of the direct final rule located in 

the rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amy Bhesania at (913) 551–7147, or by 

email at bhesania.amy@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

final rules section of the Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the state’s 

SIP revision as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

revision amendment and anticipates no 

relevant adverse comments to this 

action. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no relevant adverse comments 

are received in response to this action, 

no further activity is contemplated in 

relation to this action. If EPA receives 

relevant adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed action. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period 

on this action. Any parties interested in 

commenting on this action should do so 

at this time. Please note that if EPA 

receives adverse comment on part of 

this rule and if that part can be severed 

from the remainder of the rule, EPA may 

adopt as final those parts of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. For additional information, 

see the direct final rule which is located 

in the rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

Dated: September 11, 2012. 

Karl Brooks, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

[FR Doc. 2012–23133 Filed 9–19–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0550; FRL–9718–2] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, San Diego 

County, Antelope Valley and Monterey 

Bay Unified Air Pollution Agencies 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 183 / Thursday, September 20, 2012 / Proposed Rules 58353 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

revisions to the San Diego County Air 

Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD) 

and Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution 

Control District (MBUAPCD) and 

Antelope Valley Air Quality 

Management District (AVAQMD) 

portions of the California State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). These 

revisions concern volatile organic 

compound (VOC) emissions from 

coating of metal containers, closures 

and coils and from graphic arts 

operations and the provision of 

sampling and testing facilities required 

for permitting and from adhesives and 

sealant applications. We are proposing 

to approve local rules to regulate these 

emission sources under the Clean Air 

Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the 

Act). 

DATES: Any comments on this proposal 

must arrive by October 22, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number R09–OAR– 

2012–0550, by one of the following 

methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through 

www.regulations.gov or email. 

www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, and EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send email 

directly to EPA, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the public comment. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at www.regulations.gov 

and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California. While all documents in the 

docket are listed at 

www.regulations.gov, some information 

may be publicly available only at the 

hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 

material, large maps), and some may not 

be publicly available in either location 

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andy Steckel, EPA Region IX, (415) 

947–4115, Steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

proposal addresses the following local 

rules: SDCAPCD Rule 67.4, Metal 

Container, Metal Closure and Metal Coil 

Coating Operations; SDCAPCD Rule 

67.16, Metal Container, Graphic Arts 

Operations; MBUAPCD Rule 205, 

Provision of Sampling and Testing 

Facilities and AVAQMD 1168, Adhesive 

and Sealant Applications. In the Rules 

and Regulations section of this Federal 

Register, we are approving these local 

rules in a direct final action without 

prior proposal because we believe these 

SIP revisions are not controversial. If we 

receive adverse comments, however, we 

will publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule and address the 

comments in subsequent action based 

on this proposed rule. Please note that 

if we receive adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

we may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

We do not plan to open a second 

comment period, so anyone interested 

in commenting should do so at this 

time. If we do not receive adverse 

comments, no further activity is 

planned. For further information, please 

see the direct final action. 

Dated: August 3, 2012. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2012–21226 Filed 9–19–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS