alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H.L.C.

IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 291

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make corrections in the enrollment

of S. 1587.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER, 20, 1994

Mr. CONYERS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to.

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make corrections

in the enrollment of S. 1587.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (S. 1587)

3 to revise and streamline the acquisition laws of the Fed4 eral Government, and for other purposes, the Secretary

5 of the Senate shall make the following corrections:

6 (1) In paragraph (2)(A) of the matter proposed

7 to be added at the end of section 3553(f) of title 31,

8 United States Code, by paragraph (2) of section

9 1403(c)—
2

H.L.C.

•HCON 291 ATH

1 (A) strike out ‘‘person’’ both places it ap2 pears and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘party’’; and

3 (B) strike out ‘‘subparagraph (C)’’ and in4 sert in lieu thereof ‘‘subparagraph (B)’’.

5 (2) In the matter proposed to be inserted in

6 section 111(f)(5) of the Federal Property and Ad7 ministrative Services Act of 1949 by subsection (a)

8 of section 1435, insert after ‘‘and no party’’ in the

9 second sentence the following: ‘‘(other than a small

10 business concern (within the meaning of section 3(a)

11 of the Small Business Act))’’.

12 (3) In the matter proposed to be added at the

13 end of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act

14 by section 4101—

15 (A) strike out ‘‘subsection (c)’’ in sub16 section (a)(2) of such matter and insert in lieu

17 thereof ‘‘subsection (b)’’; and

18 (B) strike out ‘‘subsection (a)’’ in sub19 section (b) of such matter and insert in lieu

20 thereof ‘‘subsection (a)(2)’’.

21 (4) In the matter proposed to be added at the

22 end of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act

23 by section 8003, strike out ‘‘subsections (a)’’ in sub24 section (c) of such matter and insert in lieu thereof

25 ‘‘subsections (a)(2)’’.
3

H.L.C.

•HCON 291 ATH

1 (5) In subsection (c) of section 10001, strike

2 out ‘‘and 7207’’ and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘and

3 7206’’.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 68132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29017]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP00-447-000]


Distrigas of Massachusetts LLC; Notice of Site Visit

November 7, 2000.
    On November 14, 2000, staff from the Office of Energy Projects 
(OEP) will conduct a pre-certification site visit of the proposed High 
Pressure Expansion Project at Distrigas of Massachusetts LLC's (DOMAC) 
existing liquefied natural gas storage facility in Everett, 
Massachusetts. Representatives of DOMAC will accompany the OEP staff.
    All interested parties may attend the site visit. Those planning to 
attend must provide their own transportation. For further information 
on attending the site visit, please contact the Commission's Office of 
External Affairs at (202) 208-0004.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29017 Filed 11-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Cumberland County and the contiguous counties of Adams, Dauphin, Franklin, Perry, and York in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania constitute a disaster area as a result of damages caused by a fire that occurred on December 18, 1999 in the Borough of Carlisle. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on March 24, 2000, and for economic injury until the close of business on October 24, 2000 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 1 Office, 360 Rainbow Boulevard South, 3rd Floor, Niagara Falls, NY 14303.

The interest rates are: 

## For Physical Damage

Homeowners with credit available elsewhere: 7.500% 

Homeowners without credit available elsewhere: 3.750% 

Businesses with credit available elsewhere: 8.000% 

Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere: 4.000% 

Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere: 6.750% 

## For Economic Injury 

Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere: 4.000% 

The numbers assigned to this disaster are 323605 for physical damage and 9G6200 for economic injury. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) 

Dated: January 24, 2000. 

Aida Alvarez, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 00-2949 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7545** 

IGOR KOOB , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Douglas E. Miller , Magistrate Judge. ( 2:11

- cv - 00195

- DEM )

Submitted : February 23, 2012 Decided: February 28, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un publi shed per curiam opinion
. Igor Koob, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Mozley Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Igor Koob seeks to appeal the magis trate judge ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. ∗ The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will n ot issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find th at the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the
p risoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude t hat Koob has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

∗ The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 636(c) (2006).3 and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSE D
Environmental Statement
Emission to the air: The level of emission to the air is estimated to be very low (the substance has a low to negligible vapour pressure) and the duration so brief that they will have no significant influence on the external environment. The major risk of emissions to the air is dust formation when dosing the anhydrides to the reactor. For working environmental reasons, these chemicals will be dosed while there is a slight vacuum on the reactor. In case of dust problems, a dus t filter will be installed at the exhaust.
Emission to the air during reaction is also considered to be very limited. The reaction takes place in a closed reactor with airing through a small duct. There is no mechanical exhaust, and the duct only functions as a hyper pressure vent.
Dust explosion: The substance is a water suspension/solution. It is estimated to pose no risk of dust explosion.

Wastewater: The only source of wastewater is the water used for cleaning the reactor after production of the substance. T his water will, however, be used to dilute the substance, hence there will be no emission to the public sewer.

Chemical waste: No chemical waste is expected.
Stages in the import process where emissions or discharges to the environment may occur: During i mport

Physical form of the substance for each location into which the substance will be released and the anticipated frequency, duration and rate of release:

Estimate of the fugitive emissions:

As explained above no effluent and emission is expected to be released to the environment.

T he contingency plan to deal with unintended releases from the manufacturing processes : No unintended release is expected, but there will be extra basins in case of spillage or leakage.

I nformation on any potential releases from commercial or consumer products or potential releases during processing by domestic customers :
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Lawrence E. Johnson, Defendant.

County Court, Dutchess County,

March 31, 1958.

*Lawrence E. Johnson,*defendant in person.

*Raymond C. Baratta, District Attorney (Eugene F. Frink*of counsel), for plaintiff.

*104Judge Burke,

in the majority opinion, stated that a writ of error *coram nobis*may not be invoked to show an error of law apparent on the face of the record. The defendant’s claim was reviewable upon an appeal from the judgment of conviction. "Where the alleged error is evident and does not affect the validity of the judgment of conviction, but only the validity of the sentence, *coram nobis*does not lie. Judge Burke further stated that to allow relief to the defendant by way of *coram nobis,*would be to disregard the purpose of the historic writ. It is an emergency measure enabling a defendant to void the effects of a *conviction*— when *all other avenues of judicial relief are closed to him.*The court further stated that *coram nobis*may not be utilized as an alternative remedy to appeal, motion in arrest of judgment, motion to withdraw plea, or habeas corpus. *(People*
      *105v. *Kendricks,*300 N. Y. 544; *People*v. *Gersewitz,*294 N. Y. 163, 167; *Paterno*v. *Lyons,*334 U. S. 314; *People ex rel. Wachowicz*v. *Martin,*293 N. Y. 361.)

Judge Fuld,

concurring in the majority decision stated that we have Expanded the scope of the writ, beyond its original purpose, to include cases in which a second or fourth felony offender asserts the invalidity of a prior conviction even though such invalidity is not ascribable to an error of fact not apparent on the record. That departure however, furnishes no sound basis for extending it further to cover a situation such as is here presented.

In the instant case, the court is in accord with the decision in the *Sullivan*case and concludes that a hearing should be denied and defendant’s petition for a writ of error *coram nobis*should be dismissed.

Submit order accordingly, with copy forwarded to defendant.
#### BAKER v. STATE.

No. 22147.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 3, 1942.

George T. Thomas, of Big Spring, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for “drunk driving” of an automobile on a public road, punishment, $100 fine and six months in jail.

Notwithstanding his plea of guilty appellant gave notice of appeal to this court.

The facts proven support the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

SAYBREE FILLYAW, ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) No. 3:22-CV-1112-N (BH) 

 ) 

COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK & ) 

 TRUST, et al., ) 

 Defendants. ) Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge1

ORDER OF THE COURT ON RECOMMENDATION REGARDING 

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL 

 After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections 

thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the 

opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are 

accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. The Court hereby finds and orders: 

( ) The request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is GRANTED. 

(X) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED because 

the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that the appeal is not taken 

in good faith. In support of this certification, the Court adopts and incorporates 

by reference the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation filed in this case on 

August 22, 2023. Based on those findings, this Court finds that the appeal 

presents no legal points of arguable merit and is therefore frivolous. 

(X) Although this court has certified that the appeal is not taken in good faith 

under 28 U.S. C. § 1915(a)(3) and Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3), the plaintiff 

may challenge this finding pursuant to Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197 (5th 

Cir. 1997), by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on 

appeal with the Clerk of Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 

within 30 days of this order. 

1

By Special Order No. 3-251, this pro se case has been automatically referred for full case management. 

Case 3:22-cv-01112-N-BH Document 47 Filed 12/15/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 597
DATE: December 15, 2023. 

 _______________________________________ 

 DAVID C. GODBEY 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01112-N-BH Document 47 Filed 12/15/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 598
(logo) PACIFIC LIFE

 

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

Houston Galleria Mall Trust 2015-HGLR,

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

Series 2015-HGLR

 

We, the undersigned officers,on behalf of Pacific Life Insurance Company, as Special Servicer (the“Certifying Servicer”), certify to J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial MortgageSecurities Corp. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with theknowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

 

We have reviewed theCertifying Servicer’s activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the“Reporting Period”) and the Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Trustand Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2015 (the “Agreement”);and 

 

To the best of our knowledge,based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period. 

 

 

Date: March 7, 2019

 

PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCECOMPANY, as Special

Servicer

 

By: /s/ L. Lisa Fields

Name: L. Lisa Fields

Title: AVP, Asset Management& Servicing

 

By: DeAnne A. Reed

Name: DeAnne A. Reed

Title: Assistant Secretary

 

 

**PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCECOMPANY**

700 Newport Center Drive,Newport Beach, California 92660-6307, Telephone (949) 219-3011
Case 2:22-cr-00042-Z-BR   Document 156   Filed 09/07/23    Page 1 of 3   PageID 791

Case 2:22-cr-00042-Z-BR   Document 156   Filed 09/07/23    Page 2 of 3   PageID 792

Case 2:22-cr-00042-Z-BR   Document 156   Filed 09/07/23    Page 3 of 3   PageID 793
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Elbert Scott, Jr., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Erie County,

March 12, 1958.

*310
      *Jacob Weissfeld*for appellant.

*Robert A. Burrell*for respondent.

Michael Catalano, J.

The defendant has been convicted of violating subdivision 5 of section 70 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law in that he did unlawfully drive an automobile on the streets of Buffalo, New York, while in a state of public intoxication, such being a midsdemeanor. A jury trial was demanded and had before the City Court of Buffalo and a jury of six on October 25, 1957. The defendant was found guilty as charged and convicted. He was sentenced to pay $100 fine, 30 days in the Erie County Penitentiary, sentence suspended, placed on probation for one year, and his driver’s license was revoked.

The trial court failed to charge the jury that the defendant was presumed to be innocent until the contrary be proved. In fact, at no time did the court ever mention the word “ innocent ” or ‘ *‘*innocence ’ ’ in its entire charge. The court did charge: “ Now, there is a rule of law that in order to convict a man of any crime or offense, that a Jury must be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of his guilt; ” but it stopped there, omitting any reference to the presumed innocence of the defendant. The attorney for the defendant made no requests to charge, nor did he take any exception thereto.

Section 420 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, entitled *“*Charge to jury ” provides, in part: “ In charging the jury, the court must state to them, all matters of law which it thinks necessary for their information in giving their verdict”.

Section 389, entitled “ Defendant presumed innocent, until contrary proved. In case of reasonable doubt, entitled to acquittal ’ ’, provides: “A defendant in a criminal action is presumed to be innocent until the contrary be proved; and in case of a reasonable doubt whether his guilt is satisfactorily shown, he is entitled to an acquittal.”

When a jury trial is demanded in a criminal case, the defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on the law as an essential of the trial, including the rule of law that a defendant is presumed to be innocent until the contrary is established beyond a reasonable doubt, and such may not be waived by failure to object and take appropriate exception. *(People*v. *Wallens,*297 N. Y. 57, 62-63; *People*v. *Leavitt,*301 N. Y. 113, 117.)

Judgment reversed upon the law, the fine remitted and new trial ordered.

Prepare and submit judgment accordingly. ^
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 194

To designate the week beginning September 19, 1993, as ‘‘National

Historically Black Colleges Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 10, 1993

Mr. SPENCE introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the week beginning September 19, 1993, as

‘‘National Historically Black Colleges Week’’.

Whereas there are 107 Historically Black Colleges and Universities in the United States;

Whereas such colleges and universities provide the quality

education so essential to full participation in a complex,

highly technological society;

Whereas black colleges and universities have a rich heritage

and have played a prominent role in American history;
2

•HJ 194 IH

Whereas such institutions have allowed many underprivileged

students to attain their full potential through higher education; and

Whereas the achievements and goals of the Historically Black

Colleges and Universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week beginning September 19, 1993, is des4 ignated as ‘‘National Historically Black Colleges Week’’

5 and the President is authorized and requested to issue a

6 proclamation calling upon the people of the United States

7 and interested groups to observe such week with appro8 priate ceremonies, activities, and programs, thereby dem9 onstrating support for Historically Black Colleges and

10 Universities in the United States.

Æ
# Official Journal C 333/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 333 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 605 October 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 333

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 605 October 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 333/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2017/C 333/02 | Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 19 June 2017 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.40013 — Lighting Systems — Rapporteur: Hungary | 2 |
| 2017/C 333/03 | Final Report of the Hearing Officer — AT.40013 — Lighting Systems | 3 |
| 2017/C 333/04 | Summary of Commission Decision of 21 June 2017 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40013 — Lighting Systems) (notified under document C(2017) 4100) | 4 |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2017/C 333/05 | Special Report No 13/2017 — ‘A single European rail traffic management system: will the political choice ever become reality?’ | 7 |
| | NOTICES CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | EFTA Surveillance Authority |
| 2017/C 333/06 | State aid — Decision to raise no objections | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 333/01

Euro exchange rates

1

2017/C 333/02

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 19 June 2017 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.40013 — Lighting Systems — Rapporteur: Hungary

2

2017/C 333/03

Final Report of the Hearing Officer — AT.40013 — Lighting Systems

3

2017/C 333/04

Summary of Commission Decision of 21 June 2017 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40013 — Lighting Systems) (notified under document C(2017) 4100)

(notified under document C(2017) 4100)

4

Court of Auditors

2017/C 333/05

Special Report No 13/2017 — ‘A single European rail traffic management system: will the political choice ever become reality?’

7

NOTICES CONCERNING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

EFTA Surveillance Authority

2017/C 333/06

State aid — Decision to raise no objections

8

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN