### Name: John M. McManus

Title: Vice President- Environmental Service Company: American Electric Power Sign Date: 6/30/2010 Name: Scott W. Banach Title: Director, Project Engineering Company: Platt Environmental Services, Inc. Sign Date: 6/25/2010 Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date 

## Rockport Unit 2 Final Test Report for

/ / Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this test report are true, accurate, and complete. I have reviewed all testing details and results in this test report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 1 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010 Facility Information: Rockport Unit 2 2791 N. U.S. Hwy 231

Rockport IN 47635
Contact: Paul Jackson

Phone: 614-716-3278

Fax: 614-716-1252

Email: pmjackson@aep.com Testing Company:
Platt Environmental Services, Inc. 1520 Kensington Road

Suite 204

Oak Brook IL 60523
Contact: Scott Banach

Phone: 630-521-9400

Fax: 630-521-9494

Email: sbanach@plattenv.com

Air Permit Number:
T147-27400-00020 Permitted Source ID/Name:
MB-2 T147-27400-0

Permitted Maximum Process Rate:
12374 mmBTU/hr Max. Normal Operation Process Rate:
12374 mmBTU/hr Target Process Test Rate
12374 mmBTU/hr

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or process flow diagram:

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates. Industry/SCC/NAIS

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information: AFS #: FRS #:

SCC / Description 10100226 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal - Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom Tangential (Subbituminous Coal)

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width
Stack 510 1020 4080 4 0 3 0 0

Target Parameter Test Method Number of

Test Runs Test Run

Duration Sample

Points Comments Location

Carbon Monoxide Method 10 3 120 0 Stack Total organic compounds

(TOC) Method 25A 3 120 0 Stack

O2 Method 3A O2 3 120 0 Stack Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 120 0 Stack



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 2 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010 The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates.



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 3 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010 Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary



### Location Stack - Method 10 Average
Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 3/4/2010 3/4/2010 3/4/2010

Run Start Time 9:50:00 AM 12:30:00 PM 2:52:00 PM

Run Finish Time 12:08:00 PM 2:29:00 PM 4:51:00 PM
Carbon Dioxide, % 11.94 12.74 12.7 12.460 Oxygen, % 6.25 6.24 6.21 6.233 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 199594257 200793053 199025308 199,804,206. 000
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9948 9913 9967 9,942.667
Moisture, % 9.55 9.11 9.39 9.350 Fuel Type Override Override Override

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Location Stack - Method 25A Average
Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time
Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2
Moisture, % Fuel Type

Fw

Fc



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 4 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2 Average
Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time
Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2
Moisture, % Fuel Type

Fw

Fc



### Location Stack - Method 3A O2 Average
Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time
Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2
Moisture, % Fuel Type

Fw

Fc



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 5 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010 Emissions Summary

Process Run Data 

### Location: Stack - Method 10 Compound: Carbon Monoxide Average
Run 1 2 3 lb/mmBtuO2 3.75E-01 2.61E-01 2.20E-01 0.285
ppm 3.64E+02 2.54E+02 2.13E+02 277.000 ppm@7%O2 3.45E+02 2.41E+02 2.02E+02 262.667



### Location: Stack - Method 25A Compound: Total organic compounds (TOC) Average
Run 1-THC 2-THC 3-THC lb/mmBtuO2 6.91E-05 2.43E-05 7.56E-05 0.000
ppm 1.56E-01 5.51E-02 1.71E-01 0.127 ppm@7%O2 1.48E-01 5.22E-02 1.62E-01 0.121



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 6 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010
Process Run Data



### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value
1 Subbituminous Coal Burned 1375 1000 Tons/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1400



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 7 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

1 Gross Load 1312 MW The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1300



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 8 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

1 Steam Pressure 3783 psig The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 3800



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 9 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

1 Heat Input 13152 mmBTU/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 12374



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 10 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

2 Subbituminous Coal Burned 1375 1000 Tons/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1400



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 11 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

2 Gross Load 1312 MW The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1300



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 12 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

2 Steam Pressure 3783 psig The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 3800



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 13 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

2 Heat Input 13152 mmBTU/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 12374



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 14 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

3 Subbituminous Coal Burned 1375 1000 Tons/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1400



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 15 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

3 Gross Load 1312 MW The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1300



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 16 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

3 Steam Pressure 3783 psig The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 3800



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 17 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data 3 Heat Input 13152 mmBTU/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 12374



### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value
1 ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION 1000 lb/hr 1000

2 ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION 1000 lb/hr 1000



### 3 ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION 1000 lb/hr 1000

1 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 64 sets in service 64



### 2 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 64 sets in service 64

3 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 64 sets in service 64



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 18 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010
Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail



### Location Stack - Method 10 Average Run Number 1 2 3
Test Date 3/4/2010 3/4/2010 3/4/2010 Run Start Time 9:50:00 AM 12:30:00 PM 2:52:00 PM Run Finish Time 12:08:00 PM 2:29:00 PM 4:51:00 PM Carbon Dioxide, % 11.94 12.74 12.7 12.460 Oxygen, % 6.25 6.24 6.21 6.233 Fuel Factor 1.23 1.15 1.16 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 199594257 200793053 199025308 199,804,206 .000 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9948 9913 9967 9,942.667 Moisture, % 9.55 9.11 9.39 9.350 Analyzer Make Analyzer Model 0618817339 0618817339 0618817339 618,817,339 .000 Analyzer Serial Number 0618817339 0618817339 0618817339 618,817,339 .000 Operating Range 2000 2000 2000 2,000.000 Operating Units ppm ppm ppm No. Readings/Avg. 120 120 120 120.000 Calibration Set 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID CC66906-CO CC66906- CO CC66906-CO

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.467 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias -29.69 0.05 0.02 -9.873 Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID CC50124-CO CC50124- CO CC50124-CO

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 299.4 299.7 299.6 299.567 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias -0.39 -0.38 -0.38 -0.383 Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID CC66906-CO CC66906- CO CC66906-CO

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.400 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias -29.67 0.02 0.02 -9.877 Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 1.9999999999 9996E-02 0.03 0 0.017

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID CC50124-CO CC50124- CO CC50124-CO

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 299.7 299.6 300.6 299.967 Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias -0.38 -0.38 -0.33 -0.363 Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.01 0 0.05 0.020 Cavg 357.3 250 209.9 272.400 Cavg Units ppmvd ppmvd ppmvd Cgas 363.5608 254.1289 213.0563 276.915 Cgas Units ppmvd ppmvd ppmvd Fuel Type Override Override Override
Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000
Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000 Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 19 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010 Cgasw Units



### Location Stack - Method 25A Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type
Fw
Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 20 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type
Fw
Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 21 of 22

### Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type
Fw
Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 22 of 22