alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                     STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                 HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC., GENERAL PARTNER OF
                       HIGHWOODS REALTY LIMTED PARTNERSHIP

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Realty Limited
Partnership (the "Operating Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carman J. Liuzzo, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the
Operating Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted
pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Operating Partnership.

    /s/ CARMAN J. LIUZZO
-------------------------------------
Carman J. Liuzzo
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
November 14, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than November 29, 2000. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272: 

1. Robert B. Mathieu, Delhi, Louisiana; to retain voting shares of Delhi Bancshares, Inc., Delhi, Louisiana, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Guaranty Bank and Trust Company of Delhi Louisiana, Delhi, Louisiana. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 9, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-29304 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit
      9.2

---



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent
    to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement
    No. 333-13182 of United Utilities plc on Form F-3 of our report dated June
    1, 2005 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an emphasis
    of matter paragraph relating to the differences between accounting principles
    generally accepted in the United Kingdom and accounting principles generally
    accepted in the United States of America, described
    in Note 37 which has been restated) relating to the consolidated financial
    statements appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of United Utilities
plc for the year ended March 31, 2005.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Manchester, United Kingdom
1 June 2005

---
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SkillSoft Public Limited
Company (the "Company") for the period ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Charles E. Moran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his
knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      December 9, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Charles
      E. MoranCharles
      E. MoranChief
      Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [AZ-010-1430-01; AZA-28743] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The following land has been found suitable for direct sale under Section 203 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2750, 43 U.S.C. 1713), at not less than the estimated fair market value of $21,000. The land will not be offered for sale until at least 60 days after the date of this notice.

## Gila and Salt River Meridian, Arizona 

T. 39 N., R. 7 E., 

Sec. 4, Lots 14, 15, and 18, inclusive. 

Containing 22.72 acres. 

The land described is hereby segregated from appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining laws, pending disposition of this action or 270 days from the date of publication of this notice, whichever occurs first. 

This land is being offered by direct sale to Marble Canyon Company, Marble Canyon, Arizona, who own that portion of the Marble Canyon Airstrip which is located on the subject parcel. The parcel has been leased for airstrip purposes since the early 1950s. 

The sale would be for the surface estate only. The patent, when issued, will contain certain reservations to the United States and will be subject to a restrictive covenant to protect scenic values of the area. 

# DATES:

Interested parties may submit comments on or before December 28, 2000 to the Field Manager, Arizona Strip Field Office at the address below. In the absence of timely objections, this proposal shall become the final determination of the Department of the Interior. 

# ADDRESSES:

Detailed information concerning the reservations, as well as, specific conditions of the sale are available for review at the Arizona Strip Field Office, Bureau of Land Management, 345 East Riverside Drive, St. George, Utah 84790. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Laurie Ford, Realty Specialist, at the address listed above or phone (435) 688-3271. 

Dated: October 31, 2000. 

Roger G. Taylor, 

Arizona Strip Field Manager. 

[FR Doc. 00-28983 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-32-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10065

USDC No. 3:94-CV-2153-R

__________________

BILLY WAYNE HORTON,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, Director,

Texas Dep't of Criminal 

Justice, Institutional 

Division,

 Respondent-Appellee.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas 

____________________

(June 6, 1995)

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

Billy Wayne Horton's notice of appeal has been treated as a

request for a certificate of probable cause (CPC) pursuant to

Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Horton exhausted his state habeas corpus

remedies with respect to the claims raised in the instant

petition subsequent to the district court's entry of judgment

dismissing his petition for failure to exhaust. See Picard v.

Conner, 404 U.S. 270, 275-78 (1971).

Therefore, Horton's motion for CPC is GRANTED, the judgment

of the district court is VACATED, and the petition is REMANDED

for consideration of the merits. See Clark v. Williams, 693 F.2d

381, 382 (5th Cir. 1982). The district court is also directed to
O R D E R

No. 95-10065

-2-

determine whether Horton was "in custody" for the instant

burglary conviction at the time that he filed his federal

petition. See Thompson v. Collins, 981 F.2d 259, 261 (5th Cir.

1993); see also Garlotte v. Fordice, 29 F.3d 216, 217 (5th Cir.

1994), cert. granted, 115 S. Ct. 929 (1995), rev'd. 1995 

WL 318633 (U.S. May 30, 1995).
1 

### Wiley, Adina

From: Kathleen Smith <ksmith@coronado-ventures.com>

Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 4:13 PM

To: Wiley, Adina; Robinson, Jeffrey

Cc: Larry Moon; Richard Alonso; John Upchurch

Subject: Re: GHG Permitting Authority Letter

Jeff

‐

Thank you for the attached letter. We intend to maintain EPA as the permitting authority for the Pinecrest Energy Center and

would like EPA to continue to proceed with completion of the GHG permit. Thank you very much.

Best Regards,

Kathleen

Kathleen Smith

Managing Partner

Coronado Power Ventures, LLC

281-253-4385

ksmith@coronado-ventures.com

From: <Wiley>, Adina < Wiley.Adina@epa.gov >

Date: Thursday, March 27, 2014 2:09 PM

To: Kathleen Smith < ksmith@coronado

‐ ventures.com >

Subject: GHG Permitting Authority Letter



### Sending on behalf of Jeff Robinson.

Adina R. Wiley, Environmental Engineer

U.S. EPA Region 6

Air Permits Section (6PD

‐ R)

1445 Ross Ave.

Dallas, TX 75202

(214) 665

‐ 2115

wiley.adina@epa.gov

POSITIONS or VIEWS EXPRESSED DO NOT REPRESENT OFFICIAL EPA POLICY
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 77 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 77

To prohibit any political demonstrations on hallowed ground of national 
                              cemeteries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 1993

  Mr. Sundquist (for himself and Mr. Tanner) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
To prohibit any political demonstrations on hallowed ground of national 
                              cemeteries.

Whereas Arlington National Cemetery is the final resting place for those who 
        have proudly served in defense of their country;
Whereas these honored dead are due the full measure of our Nation's respect and 
        gratitude; and
Whereas it cheapens their service and demeans their memory to make Arlington 
        National Cemetery a prop for political demonstrations: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Arlington National Cemetery be placed permanently off-limits for 
political demonstrations and displays, and that the grounds of 
Arlington National Cemetery be closed to those who would use the 
grounds as a backdrop for protest.

                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

To: A Member of the Bar of the Northern District of Texas Who May be Subject to Disciplinary 

Action

Notice of Intent to Impose Reciprocal Discipline and

Standing Order for Counsel to Show Cause

A summary or copy of a sanction imposed against you is attached to this order. Reciprocal discipline 

will be imposed in this court under LR 83.8(a) and (h) and LCrR 57.8(a) and (h) unless you show cause 

within 14 days of the date of this order why such penalty should not be imposed. If you are a registered 

user of the Electronic Case Files (ECF) system in this court, the clerk will serve this order electronically, 

and you may use ECF to file your response electronically in the case number shown at the top of this order.

If you do not file a response within the time allowed, or if you respond but do not oppose reciprocal 

discipline, the clerk is directed to impose the same sanction in this court, which will run concurrently with 

the sanction shown in the attachment, and, if applicable, to disable your ECF user account. If the sanction 

imposed was a suspension and you wish to seek reinstatement following the suspension, the clerk is 

authorized to reinstate you to the bar of this court and to reactivate your ECF user account if you file a 

request for reinstatement in this case, along with a valid Certificate of Good Standing issued by the highest 

court of any state or the District of Columbia and a declaration, signed and sworn under penalty of perjury,

that no attorney disciplinary matter is pending against you. 

SO ORDERED.

Case 3:22-mc-00027-B Document 5 Filed 05/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 15
#### BARNETT v. SMITH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 16, 1951.

Rehearing Denied June 15, 1951.

Carroll Morrow, Madisonville, for appellant.

Waddill, Laffoon & Nichols, Madison-ville, for appellee.

LATIMER, Justice.

This appeal is prosecuted from judgment dismissing appellant’s petition below against appellee, Walter Smith. By agreement of all the parties and upon appellant’s motion so to do, this appeal is to be considered upon the transcript in the appeal of Story et al. Barnett, Adm’r., Ky., 239 S.W.2d 921; wherein appellant here sought judgment against both Smith, appellee here, and the Storys, appellants there.

In that case Smith claimed the accident was caused by negligence of the Storys and the Storys claimed that it was caused by the negligence of Smith. The jury rendered a verdict only against the Storys. It was proper for the court to dismiss the action as against Smith.

The judgment is affirmed.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 17

- 15479 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:16

- cr - 00517

- VMC

- AEP

- 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus RICHMOND JOSEPH MCDONALD,

Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (September 6, 2018)
B efore MARCUS , MARTIN and JILL PRYOR , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM : The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert ,

Case: 17-15479 Date Filed: 09/06/2018 Page: 1 of 22 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

- 51 (11th C ir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Bascomb , 451 F.3d 1292, 1297 (11th Cir. 2006) ( a defendant is “ free to bargain away his right to raise constitutional issues as well as non - constitutional ones” ); United States v. Grinard

Henry , 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error). Case: 17-15479 Date Filed: 09/06/2018 Page: 2 of 2
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00 385 -CV Ca lvi n E. C onway , A ppe lla nt

v. Judi th B. Conw ay, Appellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF WILLI AMSO N COUNTY , 395TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 01- 1854 -F 395 , HO NORAB LE MICH AEL JERGINS , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M EM O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Appellant Calvin E. Conway , ap p ea ringpro se, ha s filed a letter with this C ourt stating, “ Irespe ctfully

withdr aw my

appea l effe ctive the a

bove date .” We will construe the a pp e lla nt’ s le tte r a s a mot ion to dis mis s his a pp e a l. Ac c or din g ly , we g ra nt t he mot ion

and dis mis s the appe al. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (1).

__________________________________________ Diane H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustices Patterson, Pury ear and He nson Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: May

2, 2008
EXHIBIT 33.1





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIAFOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES





Entergy New Orleans, LLC (the “Servicer”), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:





(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Storm Recovery Bonds: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), 2(iii) (advances or guarantees), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), (4)(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(x) (funds held in trust for an obligor), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), and (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);





(2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;





(3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2022,  which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and





(4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.











---




Dated: March 24, 2023


Entergy New Orleans, LLC, as servicer


By :/s/ Barrett E. Green





Name:  Barrett E. Green


Title:   Vice President and Treasur
Exhibit 32.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of HepaLife Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Amit S. Dang, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(i)        the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)       The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



HEPALIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date:March 17, 2010
     
     By:
     
     /s/ Amit S. DangAmit S. Dang
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Secretary and Chief Financial Officer




This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





---
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 236

Authorizing the 1994 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the

Capitol Grounds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1994

Mr. TRAFICANT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 1994 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be

run through the Capitol Grounds.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL

4 OLYMPICS TORCH RELAY THROUGH CAPITOL

5 GROUNDS.

6 On May 20, 1994, or on such other date as the

7 Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Presi8 dent pro tempore of the Senate may jointly designate, the

9 1994 Special Olympics Torch Relay may be run through

10 the Capitol Grounds, as part of the journey of the Special
2

•HCON 236 IH

1 Olympics torch to the District of Columbia Special Olym2 pics summer games at Gallaudet University in the District

3 of Columbia.

4 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

5 The Capitol Police Board shall take such action as

6 may be necessary to carry out section 1.

7 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA8 TIONS.

9 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions

10 for physical preparations for the event authorized by

11 section 1.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MIRASOLES PRODUCE USA, LLC, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-1240-E

§

SANCHEZ FARMS and §

ELIZABETH RAYAS, §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in 

this case, and the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge dated November 16, 2023, the Court finds that the Findings and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the 

Findings and Recommendation of the Court. 

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendation 

of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. 

SO ORDERED: December 4, 2023.

Case 3:22-cv-01240-E Document 25 Filed 12/04/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 138
Case 3:22-cr-00240-S   Document 33   Filed 02/08/23    Page 1 of 1   PageID 63