alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 30/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 30 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 633 February 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 30

English edition

Legislation

Volume 633 February 2020

---

| Contents | | Corrigenda | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Council Decision (EU) 2019/1815 of 24 October 2019 appointing two members and three alternate members, proposed by the Republic of Slovenia, of the Committee of the Regions ( OJ L 278, 30.10.2019 ) | 1 |

Contents

Corrigenda

page

*

Corrigendum to Council Decision (EU) 2019/1815 of 24 October 2019 appointing two members and three alternate members, proposed by the Republic of Slovenia, of the Committee of the Regions ( OJ L 278, 30.10.2019 )

( OJ L 278, 30.10.2019 )

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.

---

Corrigenda

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 30/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 30/1

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (EU) 2019/1815 of 24 October 2019 appointing two members and three alternate members, proposed by the Republic of Slovenia, of the Committee of the Regions

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 278 of 30 October 2019
  )

On page 12, in Article 1, point (b), first indent:

for:

| ‘— | Mr Aleksander Saša ARESNOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,’, |
| --- | --- |

‘—

Mr Aleksander Saša ARESNOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,’,

read:

| ‘— | Mr Aleksander Saša ARSENOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

Mr Aleksander Saša ARSENOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,’.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 222 (Thursday, November 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69287-69288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29414]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 110800D]

Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; 
Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements; Public Workshops

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of workshops.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS, Alaska Region, and the U.S. Coast Guard North Pacific 
Regional Fisheries Training Center will present workshops on the 2001 
recordkeeping and reporting requirements for the Alaska groundfish 
fisheries.

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION under the heading, ``Meeting Dates 
and Addresses,'' for dates the workshops will be held.

ADDRESSES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION under the heading, ``Meeting 
Dates and Addresses,'' for meeting addresses.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patsy A. Bearden, 907-586-7008.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The workshops will include discussion of 
proposed 2001 changes to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements 
for Alaska groundfish fisheries along with instructions for completion 
and submittal of the required forms and logsheets. Suggestions and 
feedback on existing procedures are welcome.

Meeting Dates and Addresses

    1. November 17, 2000, 10 a.m. to 12 noon Pacific standard time--
FISH EXPO, Washington State Trade and Convention Center, Room 310, 
Seattle, WA.
    2. December 4, 2000, 9 a.m to 11 a.m. for vessels, 12:30 p.m. to 
2:30 p.m. for shoreside processors, Alaska local time--Anchorage 
Federal Building, Room 154, 222 West Seventh Avenue, Anchorage, AK.
    3. January 4, 2001, 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. for vessels, 12:30 p.m. to 
2:30 p.m. for shoreside processors, Pacific standard time--NOAA Western 
Regional Center, 7600 Sandpoint Way, N.E., Building 9, Room A/B, 
Seattle, WA.
    4. January 16, 2001, 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. for vessels, 12:30 p.m. to 
2:30 p.m. for shoreside processors, Alaska local time--U.S. Coast Guard 
Base, North Pacific Regional Fisheries Training Center, Kodiak, AK.

[[Page 69288]]

    5. January 18, 2001, 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. for vessels, Alaska local 
time--Unalaska City Hall, Council Chambers, Unalaska, AK.
    6. January 19, 2001, 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. for shoreside processors, 
Alaska local time--Unalaska City Hall, Council Chambers, Unalaska, AK.

Special Accommodations

    These workshops will be physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Patsy Bearden (see FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT) at least 7 working days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: November 9, 2000.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 00-29414 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3510-22 -S
```
Case 3:22-cv-01684-S-BN Document 62 Filed 03/24/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1014
Case 3:22-cv-01684-S-BN Document 62 Filed 03/24/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1015
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Michael P. Mack, Chief Executive Officer of Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (Section 906) that, based on my knowledge:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|                      |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: August 8, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | 



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Registrant and will be retained by Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2008250EN.01S00301.xml

| 2.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

LUBBOCK DIVISION 2027 JUL 26 PM '1: 08 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

v. CASE NO. 5:22-CR-020-H-BQ-1 

LUCAS GUTIERREZ 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA 

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

This case has been referred by the United States district judge to the undersigned 

for the taking of a guilty plea. The parties have consented to appear before a United States 

magistrate judge for these purposes. This Report and Recommendation on Plea is submitted 

to the court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). 

The defendant appeared with counsel before the undersigned United States 

magistrate judge, who addressed the defendant personally in open court and informed the 

defendant of, and determined that the defendant understood, the admonitions contained in 

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

The defendant pleaded guilty (under a written plea bargain agreement with the 

government) to Count One of the Indictment, charging defendant with a violation of 

18 US.C. §§ 922(g)(l), 924(a)(2), that is, Convicted Felon in Possession of a Firearm. 

After examining Defendant under oath the undersigned magistrate judge finds the 

following: 

----

1. Defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing 

to enter this guilty plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final 

approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge; 

- - - - - - - - ·-- - - - - - - ------ ----- --- -

Case 5:22-cr-00020-H-BQ Document 27 Filed 07/26/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 48
I 

2. Defendant fully understands the nature of the charges (including each 

essential element of the offense(s) charged) and penalties; 

3. Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea 

agreement supplement; 

4. Defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes 

to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right 

to appear before a United States district judge; 

5. Defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily; 

6. Defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; 

7. There is a factual basis for this plea; and 

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of 

guilty. 

Although I have conducted these proceedings and recommend acceptance of 

Defendant's plea of guilty, the United States district judge has the power to review my 

actions and possesses final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if 

Defendant has any objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he 

is required to make those known to the United States district judge within fourteen (14) 

days of today. 

Based on the above, I recommend that Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted, that 

Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. 

Signed July 26, 2022. 

JOHN R. PARKER 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

L __________________________ _ 

Case 5:22-cr-00020-H-BQ Document 27 Filed 07/26/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 49
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00298-L

§

MARK STEPHEN GALVEZ §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent 

of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, 

and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the 

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the 

Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and 

MARK STEPHEN GALVEZ is hereby adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B), namely, Possession 

With Intent to Distribute Five Grams or More of Methamphetamine, a Schedule II Controlled Substance. Sentence will be 

imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

☒ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court accepts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence that the 

defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released and should therefore 

be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions 

of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the defendant is likely to flee or pose a 

danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of whether it has 

been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be 

detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is 

not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This 

matter shall be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

SIGNED this 6th day of February, 2023.

________________________________________

SAM A. LINDSAY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00298-L Document 27 Filed 02/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 59
(logo**)**Deloitte

 

 

**Deloitte & Touche LLP**

695 Town Center Drive

Suite 1000

Costa Mesa, CA 92626

USA

 

Tel:   714 436 7100

Fax:  714 436 7100

www.deloitte.com

 

 

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To Pacific Life InsuranceCompany:

 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment ofCompliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Pacific Life InsuranceCompany (the “Company”) complied with the relevant servicing criteria set forthin Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forthe Securitized Commercial Mortgage Loans Platform (the “Platform”) as of andfor the year ended December 31, 2018, excluding criteria 1122 (d)(l)(iii),(d)(2)(ii), (d)(3)(i), d(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii), (d)(3)(iv),(d)(4)(ii),(d)(4)(iv), (d)(4)(v), (d)(4)(ix), (d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii),(d)(4)(xiii), (d)(4)(xiv), and (d)(4)(xv), which management has determined arenot applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to thePlatform. Appendix A to management’s assertion identifies the individualasset-backed transactions defined by management as constituting the Platform.Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the relevantservicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’sassertion about the Company’s compliance with the relevant servicing criteriabased on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria, including tests on a sample basis of servicing activities related tothe Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the relevant servicing criteria during thespecified period, and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selectedservicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by thisreport and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicingactivities related to each specific asset-backed transaction included in thePlatform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliancearising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified abovethat may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by theCompany during the period covered by this report. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination doesnot provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the relevantservicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicableservicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018 for theSecuritized Commercial Mortgage Loans Platform is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects.

 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP****

 

 

February 26, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 222 (Thursday, November 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29342]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-3767-000]


Praxair, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

November 9, 2000.
    Praxair, Inc. (Praxair) submitted for filing a rate schedule under 
which Praxair will engage in wholesale electric power and energy 
transactions at market-based rates. Praxair also requested waiver of 
various Commission regulations. In particular, Praxair requested that 
the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by 
Praixair.
    On November 2, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Praxair should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, is authorized to 
issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a guarantor, 
indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and compatible 
with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or appropriate 
for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Praxair's issuances of securities or assumptions 
of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is December 4, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29342 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
Wheeling-Pittsburgh Corporation Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                   APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                     JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                                     0
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         65,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           1,203
<INVENTORY>                                                          254,998
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     327,179
<PP&E>                                                             1,072,416
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       407,660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     1,291,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                292,151
<BONDS>                                                              349,837
<COMMON>                                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                                           174,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       1,291,359
<SALES>                                                              288,767
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     288,767
<CGS>                                                                236,406
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        271,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     8,743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        9,924
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           3,832
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    6,092
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           6,092
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

JOHN WAYNE BUTZ,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 195 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.