alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 411/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 411 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 626 December 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 411

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 626 December 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 411/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2019/C 411/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 5 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 411/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2019/C 411/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

5

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 411/03 | State aid — Poland — State aids SA.51987 (2018/N) — District heating network — Tarnobrzeg; SA.52084 (2018/N) — District heating network — Ropczyce; SA.52238 (2018/N) — District heating network — Lesko; SA.54236 (2019/N) — District heating network — Dębica; and SA.55273 (2019/N) — District heating network — Ustrzyki Dolne — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 6 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2019/C 411/03

State aid — Poland — State aids SA.51987 (2018/N) — District heating network — Tarnobrzeg; SA.52084 (2018/N) — District heating network — Ropczyce; SA.52238 (2018/N) — District heating network — Lesko; SA.54236 (2019/N) — District heating network — Dębica; and SA.55273 (2019/N) — District heating network — Ustrzyki Dolne — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### POLLY v. ADAMS et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 8, 1953.

*894Harry L. Moore and Stephen Combs, Jr., Whitesburg, for movant.

Napier & Napier, Hazard, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for appeal from a judgment of the Letcher Circuit Court awarding damages in the amount of $2,300 on account of the alleged breach of a lease contract.

The motion for the appeal having been filed subsequent to the effective date, Chapter 24, Acts of 1952, amending KRS 21.080, no opinion is required.

Appeal denied. Judgment affirmed,
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Union Carbide Corporation, Linde Division, Appellant, and Local 8-215 of Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Appellant. Boleslaw Adamiec, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion to renew granted, petition dismissed, award confirmed and petitioner’s cross motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in vacating an arbitration award made in favor of the employer, Union Carbide Corporation, and in directing that the matter be heard by a new arbitration panel. The arbitration award was rendered in a controversy between Union Carbide and the union and could be vacated only on motion of a party to the arbitration *(see, Matter of Soto [Goldman],*7 NY2d 397, 399). Petitioner was not a party either to the agreement or to the arbitration. The fact that his attorney participated in the questioning of witnesses during the arbitration proceeding did not make him the union’s attorney and, although petitioner was the affected employee and a member of the union, that is not a sufficient basis for standing to challenge the arbitration award *(see,*CPLR 7511; *Matter of Soto [Goldman], supra).*Further, the petition to vacate the award was made only by petitioner, not the union, and the union has stated unequivocally that petitioner’s attorney does not represent it. Moreover, the notice of petition and petition were not personally served upon an officer of the corporation in the manner specified in CPLR 311, and the proceeding was not commenced within the 90-day period of limitations set forth in CPLR 7511 (a).

Because this proceeding was not commenced properly, it is unnecessary to consider the remaining contentions advanced by petitioner. Were we to consider those issues, we would find them to be without merit. The petition to vacate the arbitration award should have been dismissed and the award confirmed (CPLR 7511 [e]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J. — renewal.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
United States District Court 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

v. § CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:22-CR-0127-S 

§ 

DESMOND MITCHELL WILLIAMS (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY 

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a 

Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning 

Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed 

within 14 days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge 

is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea 

of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the 

plea of guilty, and DESMOND MITCHELL WILLIAMS (1) is hereby adjudged guilty of 

Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 

841(a)(1). Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. 

The Defendant is ordered to remain in custody. 

SO ORDERED. 

SIGNED June 25, 2024, Mey QL— 

KAREN GREN SCHOLER 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cr-00127-S Document 41 Filed 06/25/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 94
# Official Journal L 6/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 6 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5810 January 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 6

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5810 January 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/33 of 9 January 2015 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/34 of 9 January 2015 fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences for olive oil lodged from 5 to 6 January 2015 under the Tunisian tariff quota and suspending the issue of import licences for the month of January 2015 | 4 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/33 of 9 January 2015 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/34 of 9 January 2015 fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences for olive oil lodged from 5 to 6 January 2015 under the Tunisian tariff quota and suspending the issue of import licences for the month of January 2015

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-2 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
(the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2015, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive
Auto Receivables Trust 2015-2 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

Executive Vice President Capital Markets
and TreasurerDate:

March 30, 2017By:

/s/ Rich MorrinName:

Rich MorrinTitle:

Chief Operating OfficerDate:

March 30, 2017
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 130 S. Jefferson, Suite 300

Chicago, IL 60661

312-233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OFCOMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’SREGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year endingDecember 31, 2016, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **WellsFargo Bank** (the “Servicer”).

 

National Tax Search, LLC(“NTS”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31,2016 and for the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the“Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the“CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS bythe Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Onlyservicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “ApplicableServicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activities NTS performs withrespect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that theremaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC RegulationAB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to thetransactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this reportinclude all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS’s TaxQsystem (the “Platform Transactions”).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessedits compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Periodand has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with theApplicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the ReportingPeriod with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante & Moran, PLLC, anindependent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation reporton the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as ofDecember 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, asVendor to Servicer

 

 

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 23, 2017
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

Exhibit 11.1 Statement Re: Computation of Per-Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       Three Months Ended          Six Months Ended
                                                          December 31,               December 31,
                                                     -----------------------     ---------------------
                                                        1997         1996          1997         1996
                                                     ----------   ----------     ---------   ---------
<S>                                                  <C>          <C>            <C>         <C>
   Basic
       Average common shares outstanding              9,145,911    9,138,653     9,188,072   9,134,560
                                                     ----------- ------------ ------------- -----------

       Net (Loss) income                             $(483,000)  $ 1,115,000   $(9,429,000) $2,405,000
                                                     ----------- ------------ ------------- -----------
       Per Share amount                              $   (0.05)  $      0.12   $    (1.03)  $     0.26
                                                     ----------- ------------ ------------- -----------

   Diluted
       Average common shares outstanding              9,145,911    9,138,653     9,188,072   9,134,560
       Net effect of dilutive options and 
         warrants--based on treasury stock 
         method using average market price                   --      913,416            --     887,462
                                                     ----------- ------------ ------------- -----------
                                                      9,145,911   10,052,069     9,188,072  10,022,022
                                                     ----------  -----------  ------------- -----------
       Net (Loss) income                             $ (483,000) $ 1,115,000   $(9,429,000) $2,405,000
                                                     ----------- ------------ ------------- -----------
       Per Share amount                              $    (0.05) $      0.11   $     (1.03) $     0.24
                                                     ----------- ------------ ------------- -----------
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,231
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                       325
<INVENTORY>                                     49,303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,558
<PP&E>                                          12,295
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,702
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,267
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            90
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,699
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,702
<SALES>                                        142,613
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,613
<CGS>                                          124,076
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,070
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,654
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,661
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,993
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,993
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .75
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:22-cr-00044-H-BU Document 28 Filed 08/25/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 45
Case 1:22-cr-00044-H-BU Document 28 Filed 08/25/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 46
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeals of

-- Argo Systems, LLC Under Contract No. N40080-l3-C-0002 APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 61271, 61494

Dirk D. Haire, Esq. Alexa Santora, Esq. Rachel M. Severance, Esq. Kelsey M. O'Brien, Esq.

Fox Rothschild LLP Washington, DC Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy ChiefTrial Attorney David B. Stinson, Esq.

Trial Attorney OPINION BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE SHACKLEFORD 

### It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the parties' stipulation and agreement, that the appeals are sustained. In the nature ofa consentjudgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $500,000.00. Appellant has agreed to waive interest ifpayment is made within 120 days ofthe date ofthe Board's decision; however, ifnot paid within 120 days of this decision. interest shall be paid on thejudgment amount pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 7109 starting on the 121st day until date ofpayment. Dated: March 7, 2019

(Signatures continued) RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

# I I I 

### I concur

Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I concur

Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals



### I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 61271, 61494, Appeals of Argo Systems, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:



### 2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Case 4:22-cv-00473-P Document 1 Filed 05/31/22 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1
Case 4:22-cv-00473-P Document 1 Filed 05/31/22 Page 2 of 8 PageID 2
Case 4:22-cv-00473-P Document 1 Filed 05/31/22 Page 3 of 8 PageID 3
Case 4:22-cv-00473-P Document 1 Filed 05/31/22 Page 4 of 8 PageID 4
Case 4:22-cv-00473-P Document 1 Filed 05/31/22 Page 5 of 8 PageID 5
Case 4:22-cv-00473-P Document 1 Filed 05/31/22 Page 6 of 8 PageID 6
Case 4:22-cv-00473-P Document 1 Filed 05/31/22 Page 7 of 8 PageID 7
Case 4:22-cv-00473-P Document 1 Filed 05/31/22 Page 8 of 8 PageID 8
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Molecular Mechanism of Human Bladder Carcinogenesis.                    

*Date:*                         February 28-March 1, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         7 p.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The Ritz Carlton Huntington Hotel & Spa, 1401 South Oak Knoll Ave, Passadena, CA 91106.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Michael B Small, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8040, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/402-0996.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower, 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Start Printed Page 6387
Dated: February 3, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-2909  Filed 2-08-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Case 4:22-cr-00141-O Document 1 Filed 04/12/22 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1
Case 4:22-cr-00141-O Document 1 Filed 04/12/22 Page 2 of 12 PageID 2
Case 4:22-cr-00141-O Document 1 Filed 04/12/22 Page 3 of 12 PageID 3
Case 4:22-cr-00141-O Document 1 Filed 04/12/22 Page 4 of 12 PageID 4
Case 4:22-cr-00141-O Document 1 Filed 04/12/22 Page 5 of 12 PageID 5
Case 4:22-cr-00141-O Document 1 Filed 04/12/22 Page 6 of 12 PageID 6
Case 4:22-cr-00141-O Document 1 Filed 04/12/22 Page 7 of 12 PageID 7
Case 4:22-cr-00141-O Document 1 Filed 04/12/22 Page 8 of 12 PageID 8
Case 4:22-cr-00141-O Document 1 Filed 04/12/22 Page 9 of 12 PageID 9
Case 4:22-cr-00141-O Document 1 Filed 04/12/22 Page 10 of 12 PageID 10
Case 4:22-cr-00141-O Document 1 Filed 04/12/22 Page 11 of 12 PageID 11
Case 4:22-cr-00141-O Document 1 Filed 04/12/22 Page 12 of 12 PageID 12