### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10
- 17

- 00112
- CR MARK ALLEN COKER , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the County Court at Law No
. 1 McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 20153537CR1

ORDER
Counsel for appellant filed an Anders 1 brief. In accordance with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion in Kelly v. State , counsel indicated to this Court that he sent a copy of the record to Appellant

. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 320 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). A ppellant, Mark Allen Coker, filed a brief in this Court indicating that he does not have a hard copy o f the record to properly prepare his response.

1 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967).C oker v. State Page 2

In accordance with Stanley v. State , No. 10

- 14

- 00320

- CR, 2015 Lexis 4719 (Tex. App.

— Waco May 7, 2015, order) (per curiam), c ounsel is ORDERED to obtain and send
A ppellant, within 14 days from the date of thi s order, copies of the clerk’s and reporter’s records and to simultaneously notify this Court, the State, the trial court, and the trial court clerk when counsel has completed this task. In the event that the record made available to Appellant must be ret urned to the trial court clerk, counsel must notify Appellant and this Court of that fact. Counsel is reminded that there are certain rules and statutes that prohibit certain sensitive or illegal information from being included in a public record. See T E X
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10. If counsel has identified any such information while conducting the review of the record as necessary to prepare the Anders brief in support of counsel’s motion to withdraw, counsel should take appropriate steps to redact or in some manner remove that information from the copy of the re cord that is being provided to A ppellant. Appellant is ORDERED to file his pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief within
30 days from the date counsel sends notice to the Court that the record has b een forwarded to A ppellant, unless the due date is extended by order of this Court upon proper and timely motion by A ppellant. If counsel notified A ppellant and this Court that the record being provided to A ppellant was obtained from the trial court clerk and must be returned thereto, A ppellant is ORDERED to not take the record apart or mark on or modify the record.C oker v. State Page 3

If the record must be returned to the trial court clerk, so that its return to the trial court clerk can be monitored and enforced, Appellant is ORDERED to send the record to
this Court with A ppellant’s response. If no response is filed, but nevertheless, the record must be returned to the trial court clerk, A ppellant is ORDERED to send th e record to
this Court within 45 days of the date the at torney sends notice to the Court that the record
was forwarded to the A ppellant, unless the due date is extended by order of this Court upon proper and timely motion by A ppellant. Appellant’s failure to comply with this Order, including the failure to send the record to this Court within the time specified, if herein required, may result in the dismissal of the appeal under our inherent authority upon the presumption that the record was obtained under false pretense and with no intent to pursue the appeal b ut instead was obta ined for the purposes of delay.

PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Order issued and filed December 20, 2017 Do not publish