alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WELLSFORD REAL PROPERTIES, INC.
                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

     FOR VALUE  RECEIVED,  the  undersigned,  Wellsford  Real  Properties,  Inc.
("WRP"), a Maryland  corporation,  HEREBY PROMISES TO PAY on the Expiration Date
to the order of Commerzbank AG, New York Branch, a banking corporation organized
and existing  under the laws of The Federal  Republic of Germany  acting through
its New York Branch (the "Bank"), the unpaid amount of all obligations of WRP to
the Bank pursuant to that certain Letter of Credit Reimbursement Agreement among
WRP, Palomino Park Public Improvements Corporation and the Bank dated as of June
16, 2000 (the  "Reimbursement  Agreement") and the other Related Documents.  WRP
promises to pay interest on the unpaid  principal amount of this Promissory Note
from the date  hereof  until  such  principal  amount  is paid in full,  at such
interest rates, and payable at such times, as are specified in the Reimbursement
Agreement.  (Capitalized  terms  used  in this  Promissory  Note  which  are not
otherwise  defined herein have the same meaning as provided in the Reimbursement
Agreement.)

     Both  principal  and  interest  are  payable in lawful  money of the United
States of America in immediately  available  funds at the office of the Bank set
forth in the Reimbursement Agreement.

     This Promissory Note is one of the Promissory  Notes referred to in, and is
entitled to the benefits of, the  Reimbursement  Agreement and the other Related
Documents. The Reimbursement Agreement,  among other things, contains provisions
for  acceleration  of the maturity  hereof upon the happening of certain  stated
events and also for optional and mandatory  prepayments  on account of principal
hereof  prior to the  maturity  hereof  upon the  terms and  conditions  therein
specified.

     WRP waives presentment, demand, protest or notice of any kind in connection
with this  Promissory  Note. WRP agrees to pay to the holder hereof,  on demand,
all costs and  expenses  (including  legal fees and  disbursements)  incurred in
connection with the enforcement and collection of this Promissory Note.

     This  Promissory  Note shall be governed by, and  construed  in  accordance
with, the laws of the State of New York.

           WELLSFORD REAL PROPERTIES INC.

           By: /s/ David M. Strong
           -----------------------
                Name: David M. Strong
                Title: Vice President

<PAGE>
Order entered June 8, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00228-CR

VICENTE RAMIREZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-18106-U

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s June 6, 2018 motion to extend the time to file appellant’s 

brief. We GRANT IN PART the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed THIRTY DAYS

from the date of this order. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
IA

★

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 239

To authorize the President to proclaim September 1994 as ‘‘Classical Music

Month’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 1993

Mr. YATES introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To authorize the President to proclaim September 1994 as

‘‘Classical Music Month’’.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the President is hereby authorized and requested to

4 issue a proclamation designating September 1994 as

5 ‘‘Classical Music Month’’ and calling upon the people of

6 the United States to observe such a month with appro7 priate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCKDTVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-068-01-H

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(bxl), the undersigned District Judge is ofthe opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

DatedDecemb", L ,2022.

JAMES SLEY HENDRIX

STATES DISTRICT ruDGE

JEREMYLELAND GARCIA,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE LINITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

ITE

Case 5:22-cr-00068-H-BQ Document 26 Filed 12/02/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 53
----

            COUNCIL COMMON POSITION 2004/500/CFSP

of 17 May 2004         

updating Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism and repealing Common Position 2004/309/CFSP

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 15 and 34 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS COMMON POSITION:

Article 1

The list of persons, groups and entities to which Common Position 2001/931/CFSP applies is contained in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

Common Position 2004/309/CFSP is hereby repealed.

Article 3

This Common Position shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Article 4

This Common Position shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussel, 17 May 2004.

For the Council

The President

B. COWEN            

----

(1)OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p. 93. Common Position as last amended by Common Position 2004/309/CFSP (OJ L 99, 3.4.2004, p. 61).

----

ANNEX

List of persons, groups and entities referred to in Article 1 (1)

1.   PERSONS

2.   GROUPS AND ENTITIES

----

(1)  Persons, groups and entities marked with an * shall be the subject of Article 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP only.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 286 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 286

   Recognizing the contribution of President Alfredo Cristiani of El 
 Salvador to achieve peace and national reconciliation in El Salvador.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 17, 1994

 Mr. Ballenger (for himself and Mr. Hamilton) submitted the following 
 concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the contribution of President Alfredo Cristiani of El 
 Salvador to achieve peace and national reconciliation in El Salvador.

Whereas President Alfredo Cristiani decisively led the Government of El Salvador 
        in successful negotiations which ended that country's 12-year civil war;
Whereas President Cristiani initiated and oversaw the implementation of the 
        important initial stages of the 1992 Peace Agreement, overcoming 
        numerous obstacles in the process;
Whereas the people of the United States and El Salvador recognize President 
        Cristiani's historic achievement and the central role he has played in 
        promoting genuine national reconciliation in El Salvador;
Whereas President Cristiani ended his term of office on June 1, 1994, 
        transferring the powers of the presidency to his democratically elected 
        successor; and
Whereas this smooth and unprecedented democratic transition could not have taken 
        place had it not been for the efforts of President Cristiani to achieve 
        peace in El Salvador: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) expresses its admiration for President Cristiani for 
        his unflagging service to the cause of peace and democracy in 
        El Salvador;
            (2) applauds the statesmanlike manner in which President 
        Cristiani worked closely with the Friends of the Peace Process, 
        the United States, the United Nations, and the rest of the 
        international community to achieve peace in El Salvador;
            (3) applauds the efforts of President Cristiani to lay a 
        foundation of dignity and hope for the future of the Salvadoran 
        people; and
            (4) expresses its hope that President Cristiani will enjoy 
        success in his future endeavors and remain engaged in public 
        service on behalf of his country and on behalf of efforts to 
        advance peace, justice, and democracy throughout the Western 
        Hemisphere.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2013126EN.01S00301.xml

| 8.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 126/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 126/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ROY EARL BROWN, §

 Petitioner, § No. 3:22-cv-01066-M (BT)

§

v. § Consolidated with:

§ 3:22-cv-01067-M

BRYAN COLLIER, § 3:22-cv-01068-M

 Respondent. § 3:22-cv-01069-M

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has taken under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated June 24, 2022. The Court has 

reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error and has found none. IT 

IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. Moreover, considering the record in this case, the 

Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. The Court adopts and incorporates by reference the 

Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation filed in this case in support of its 

finding that Petitioner has failed to show (1) reasonable jurists would find this Court’s “assessment 

of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” or (2) reasonable jurists would find “it debatable 

whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” and “debatable 

whether [this Court] was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000).

SO ORDERED this 22nd day of July, 2022.

Case 3:22-cv-01066-M-BT Document 9 Filed 07/22/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 47
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK; 

MICHAEL G. ANDREN; 

TACTICAL MACHINING, LLC, a limited 

liability company; and 

FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC., a 

nonprofit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

and

BLACKHAWK MANUFACTURING GROUP 

INC. d/b/a 80 PERCENT ARMS,

Applicant in Intervention,

v.

MERRICK GARLAND, in his official capacity 

as Attorney General of the United States; 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE; STEVEN DETTELBACH, in his 

official capacity as Director of the Bureau of 

Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; and 

BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, 

FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES,

Defendants.

 Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-691-O

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING BLACKHAWK MANUFACTURING 

GROUP INC. d/b/a 80 PERCENT ARMS’ MOTION TO INTERVENE

Before the Court is Proposed Intervenor BlackHawk Manufacturing Group Inc. 

d/b/a 80 Percent Arms’ (“BlackHawk”) Motion to Intervene, filed September 22, 2022. In 

its Motion, BlackHawk seeks to intervene as a Plaintiff in this case under Federal Rule of 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 77-2 Filed 09/22/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1049
2

Civil Procedure 24(a)(2), arguing that it meets the standard for intervention as a matter of 

right, and moves in the alternative for permissive intervention under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 24(b). 

BlackHawk states that it seeks intervention as a Plaintiff for the purpose of moving

for a preliminary injunction against Defendants. Accordingly, BlackHawk submitted with

its Motion (1) a proposed Complaint; (2) a proposed Motion for Preliminary Injunction and 

supporting Brief. Plaintiffs take no position on BlackHawk’s Motion and proposed Motion 

for Preliminary Injunction, but Defendants oppose both. 

CONCLUSION

Having considered the Motion, briefing, and applicable law, the Court finds that 

BlackHawk’s Motion to Intervene should be and is hereby GRANTED.

BlackHawk shall file its Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction with all 

due haste.

SO ORDERED on this ___ day of ______________, 2022.

By: ____________________________

HON. REED O’CONNOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 77-2 Filed 09/22/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1050
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          24,524
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  200,474
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    183,509
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               431,961
<PP&E>                                         386,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (44,556)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 897,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          260,577
<BONDS>                                        189,671
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           338
<OTHER-SE>                                     366,958
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   867,514
<SALES>                                        225,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,285
<CGS>                                          162,425
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  209,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (303)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,134
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,893
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,241
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,241
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .30<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
<FN>
<F1>Reflects Basic EPS
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29663]



[[Page 69801]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 172; Future Air-Ground Communications in 
the VHF Aeronautical Data Band (118-137 MHz)

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for 
Special Committee 172 meeting to be held December 5-7, 2000, starting 
at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, 
NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.
    The agenda will include: December 5: Plenary Session; (1) 
Introductory Remarks; (2) Review and Approve Agenda; (3) Working Group-
2, AMS(R)S Avionics Equipment MOPS, (WG-2) Convenes to continue work of 
Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards (MASPS) document; 
December 6: (4) Working Group-3, AMS(R)S MASPS, (WG-3) Convenes to 
continue work of VDL 2 and VDL 3 Minimum Operational Performance 
Standards (MOPS) Document (may convene on Tuesday if WG-2 finishes 
early); December 7: (5) Plenary reconvenes; (6) Review of ICAO and 
Aeronautical Mobile Communications Panel (AMCP) activities; (7) Review 
Working Group activities; (8) Review Standards and Recommended 
Practices (SARPs) Changes; (9) Other Business; (10) Date and location 
of Next meeting; (11) Closing. Attendance is open to the interested 
public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the 
chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the 
meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information 
should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., 
Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-
9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web site). Members of the public 
may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 13, 2000.
Jancie L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 00-29663 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### GOSSETT, Banking Commissioner, v. GREEN.

No. 13986

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Forth Worth.

July 11, 1941.

Conforming to the Supreme Court’s answers to certified questions, 152 S.W.2d 733.

Ira Butler, of Fort Worth, for appellant. Slay & Simon, of Fort Worth, for ap-pellee.

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

A sufficient statement of the nature and result of this suit will be found in the opinion of Judge Smedley, adopted by the Supreme Court on June 18th, 1941, in Z. Gossett, Banking Commissioner v. Forrest Green, Tex.Com.App., 152 S.W.2d 733, answering questions certified by this court.

The only question raised by appellant’s propositions, other than those answered in the opinion of the Supreme Court, relates to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of the trial court that appellee deposited the $2,500 in question in cash.

Appellant does not here contend that the note for $2,500 was actually signed by appellee, but contends that appellee received the $2,500 from the bank as a loan. Both appellee and his wife testified, and no witness testified to the contrary, that the $2,500 so deposited was in currency which had been in the possession of the wife of appellee for some time, and which she delivered to him shortly before he deposited it in the bank. In our opinion there was sufficient evidence to support the findings of the trial court, under the rule applicable here.

 “The findings of the trial court in a case tried without a jury have the same force and are entitled to the same weight as the verdict of a jury; and it is well settled that such findings will not be disturbed by an appellate court where there is some evidence to support them, even *501though the evidence is conflicting and the appellate court might have reached a different conclusion therefrom. It is also well settled that findings of fact by the trial court will be upheld unless they are manifestly erroneous, and that they will be overruled only where they are without any evidence to support them, or where they are so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be manifestly wrong.” (3 Tex.Jur., page 1102).

Judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-233-X

§

STEPHEN SHAW (1) §

§ 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, 

the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United 

States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in 

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by 

the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and STEPHEN SHAW (1) is hereby adjudged guilty 

of 21 U.S.C. § 846, 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C) – Conspiracy to Possess with the Intent to Distribute a 

Controlled Substance. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order. 

 The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court adopts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if

released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set

the conditions of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the

defendant is likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under §

3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of

whether it has been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the

defendant should not be detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the

community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This matter shall be referred to the United States

Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

Signed this 3rd day of January, 2023.

________________________________ 

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cr-00233-X Document 33 Filed 01/03/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 60