alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 184 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 184

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 7 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                                Received

            October 8 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

       Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Designating the weekend of October 15-16, 1994, as ``Small Towns and 
                          Townships Weekend''.

Whereas small towns and townships have been the spirit and backbone of this 
        great Nation and have provided many common, traditional ideals and 
        values throughout our history;
Whereas it is appropriate to recognize the importance of small towns and 
        townships in the development of a sense of community and to highlight 
        the spirit of small towns and townships;
Whereas it is vital to unify residents of small towns and townships in the 
        process of revitalizing their own community and reinvigorating small-
        town life; and
Whereas it is fitting that official recognition be given to the importance of 
        small towns and townships and a weekend set aside for activities that 
        are most commonly associated with small towns and townships, such as 
        town festivals, family picnics, and baseball games: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the weekend of October 
15-16, 1994, is designated as ``Small Towns and Townships Weekend'', 
and the President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation 
calling on the people of the United States to observe such weekend with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Guy GIORDENELLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 23116.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 4, 1945.

Russell F. Wolters, of Houston, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for robbery, punishment assessed being five years’ imprisonment in the-penitentiary.

Appellant has filed his affidavit advising the court that he does not further desire to prosecute his appeal, and at his request the-same is dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

STEPHEN NOVIELLO, )

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) No. 3:22-CV-1342-B

)

IVEST 360, LLC d/b/a FAST CAPITAL )

360, et al., )

Defendants. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court. The defendants’ MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint, filed

August 18, 2023 (doc. 75), is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Fourth Amended

Complaint, filed September 22, 2023 (doc. 86), is DENIED. By separate judgment, the plaintiff’s

claims against defendants Barbara Weidner and Roie Raitses will be DISMISSED without prejudice

for lack of personal jurisdiction. 

SIGNED this 29

th

 day of December, 2023.

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01342-B Document 98 Filed 12/29/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1398
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)of the Exchange Act**

 

Renhui Mu, certifies that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual report onForm 20-F/A of WINS Finance Holdings Inc.;

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The company’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the company and have:

 

a.      Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the company is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared;

 

b.      Intentionally Omitted;

 

c.      Evaluated the effectivenessof the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d.      Disclosed in thisreport any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by theannual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.     The company’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’sauditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.      All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.      Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting.

 

Date:  December 13, 2017
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

ELLA CAINE, NISHA DHUNGANA SILWA, 

JOSEPHINE OGATO, SHANTORIA 

MOORE, FRANKLIN OKOH, CHYRSTAL 

JEFFERSON, NARGAS SAYED, SHARAM 

DALAWY, KRISTY ABERCROMBIE, 

DARNIQUE ADAMS, DANIELLE GRANT, 

KARAM DALAWY, ROLONDA MOORE, 

SHARON FERGUSON, NHU TRAN, 

ALYSSA DAVILA, ADRIAN JONES, 

ALISHA TERRY, AND MARI ISABEL, 

v.

EDUVISION, INC. (D/B/A ARIZONA 

COLLEGE OF NURSING - DALLAS; AZC 

EDUCATION, INC.; ARIZONA COLLEGE 

DALLAS)

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. ____________

INDEX OF MATTERS BEING FILED 

EXHIBIT B – Docket Sheet 

EXHIBIT C – Original Petition 

EXHIBIT D – Notice of Dismissal for Want of Prosecution 

EXHIBIT E – Letter 

EXHIBIT F – Citation 

EXHIBIT G – Notice of Nonsuit 

EXHIBIT H – Signed Order of Dismissal 

EXHIBIT I – Motion to Retain 

EXHIBIT J – proposed Order to Retain 

EXHIBIT K – Executed Citation 

EXHIBIT L – Notice of Dismissal for Want of Prosecution 

DOCUMENTS FILED IN STATE COURT ACTION, EXHIBITS B - L

EXHIBIT A

Case 3:22-cv-01713-S Document 1-1 Filed 08/08/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 5
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 81 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 81

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 6 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the 1993 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the 
                            Capitol Grounds.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL OLYMPICS TORCH RELAY 
              THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    On May 27, 1993, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may 
designate jointly, the 1993 Special Olympics Torch Relay may be run 
through the Capitol Grounds, as part of the journey of the Special 
Olympics torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics summer 
games at Gallaudet University in the District of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such action as may be necessary 
to carry out section 1.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event authorized by section 1.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00547-CR

DONALD RAY CAGLE APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 432ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

On October 19, 2011, as part of a plea bargain agreement, Appellant 

Donald Ray Cagle pleaded guilty to felony driving while intoxicated and true to a 

felony repetition enhancement allegation; and the trial court sentenced him to 

fifteen years’ confinement. On October 19, 2011, the trial court also certified that 

this is a plea bargain case and that Appellant has no right to appeal. On October

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

27, 2011, Appellant filed a document with the trial court that we have construed 

as a notice of appeal. He then filed an amended notice of appeal on December 

5, 2011. The trial court’s certification that Appellant has no right to appeal was 

filed in this court on December 8, 2011. On December 9, 2011, we notified 

Appellant that the certification indicating that Appellant had no right to appeal had 

been filed in this court, and that this appeal could be dismissed unless Appellant 

or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for 

continuing the appeal on or before December 19, 2011. See Tex. R. App. P. 

25.2(d), 44.3. Appellant has timely filed a response; however, the response does 

not show any grounds for continuing the appeal.

Rule 25.2(a)(2) limits the right of appeal in a plea-bargain case to matters 

that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or to cases in 

which the appellant obtained the trial court’s permission to appeal. Tex. R. App. 

P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant does not challenge a pretrial ruling on a written motion,

and the trial court’s certification denied permission to appeal. Accordingly, we 

dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 12, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 223 (Friday, November 17, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 69458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29492]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 73 and 74

[MM Docket No. 99-25; FCC 00-349]


Creation of Low Power Radio Service

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects errors in the final rule portion 
regarding low power radio service published in the Federal Register of 
November 9, 2000.

DATE: Effective December 11, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Barrie, (202) 418-2130, Policy 
and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This contains corrections to the rule 
portion of the Commission's Memorandum Opinion and Order on 
Reconsideration (``MO&O''), MM 99-25; FCC 00-349, 65 FR 67289 (November 
9, 2000). The full text of the Commission's MO&O is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Dockets 
Branch (Room TW-A306), 445 12 St. SW., Washington, DC. The complete 
text of this MO&O may also be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, International Transcription Services, (202) 857-3800, 1231 
20th St., NW., Washington, DC 20036.

Correction


Sec. 73.810  [Corrected]

    1. In Sec. 73.810, on page 67302, in the second column, paragraphs 
(b)(i), (b)(ii), (b)(iii), and (b)(iv) are corrected to read (b)(1), 
(b)(2), (b)(3), and (b)(4).


Sec. 73.860  [Corrected]

    2. In Sec. 73.860, on page 67304, in the first column, paragraphs 
(b)(i), (b)(ii), (b)(iii), and (b)(iv) are corrected to read (b)(1), 
(b)(2), (b)(3), and (b)(4).

William F. Caton,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29492 Filed 11-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Virginia Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Virginia Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | NA     | 3,500  | NA     | 4,200 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4,200  | 4,200  | 4,200  | 4,200  | 4,200  | 4,200  | 4,200  | 4,200  | 4,200  | 4,200 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5,200  | 5,200  | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
# Official Journal C 142/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.142.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 142 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5522 May 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.142.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 142

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5522 May 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 142/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 142/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 142/02 | Euro exchange rates | 5 |
| 2012/C 142/03 | Euro exchange rates | 6 |
| 2012/C 142/04 | Euro exchange rates | 7 |
| 2012/C 142/05 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under entry 27 of Annex XVII to REACH)
   (1) | 8 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 142/02

Euro exchange rates

5

2012/C 142/03

Euro exchange rates

6

2012/C 142/04

Euro exchange rates

7

2012/C 142/05

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under entry 27 of Annex XVII to REACH)
   (1)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under entry 27 of Annex XVII to REACH)

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2012/C 142/06 | Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

2012/C 142/06

Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover)

Note to the reader

s3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 262

To designate October 3 through 10, 1993, as ‘‘Great American Beer Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 15, 1993

Mr. SCHAEFER (for himself, Mr. GUNDERSON, Mr. SARPALIUS, Mr. ANDREWS

of New Jersey, Mr. BATEMAN, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin, Mr. BLILEY, Mr. BLUTE, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. COX, Mr. HOLDEN,

Mr. KLEIN, Mr. KING, Mr. LEVY, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. MURTHA, Mr.

QUINN, Mr. RAVENEL, Mr. RICHARDSON, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. SISISKY, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. WALSH, Mr. VENTO, Mr. CLINGER, Mr. EDWARDS

of Texas, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. MCINNIS, Mr. PETRI, Mr. COPPERSMITH,

Mr. LIVINGTSON, Mr. MARTINEZ, and Mr. KASICH) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post

Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate October 3 through 10, 1993, as ‘‘Great

American Beer Week’’.

Whereas the brewing industry stems from a great and proud

tradition dating back beyond the time of our Founding

Fathers;

Whereas the brewing industry is a major employer of American workers, providing for 2,700,000 jobs in the wholesale, retail, agriculture, packaging, trucking/rail and

other related sectors;
2

•HJ 262 IH

Whereas malt beverages contribute over $14,000,000,000 in

Federal, State, and local taxes in all 50 States of the

Union;

Whereas it is a major exporter in the world marketplace;

Whereas the industry has proven to be an exemplary philanthropic force time and again, most recently during Hurricane Andrew and the ‘‘Flood of 1993’’;

Whereas understanding the need to protect the environment,

the beer industry has pioneered waste reduction, recycling, and other conservation programs;

Whereas the brewers have proud records of national leadership, through innovations like the recyclable aluminum

beverage can and accomplishments in the area of environmental stewardship;

Whereas the beer industry has played a significant role in the

fight against alcohol abuse, drunk driving, and underage

drinking; spending tens of millions each year on related

educational and prevention programs; and

Whereas the industry creates a beverage that is enjoyed by

over 80,000,000 responsible consumers all across America: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week of October 3 through 10, 1993, shall be

4 designated as ‘‘Great American Beer Week’’.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. 70-784]

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rebecca Tadesse, Project Manager, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. Telephone: (301) 415-6221. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of November 2000. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Larry W. Camper, 

Chief, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.

[FR Doc. 00-29251 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P