alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 7

- 00 456

- C R



### ____________________

DAVID A

. RIGGS

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________________ _______________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 163rd District Court

Orange County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. B160099

- R

________________________________________ ________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 1, 2017, the trial court sentenced David A. Riggs to thirty years in

prison for aggravated robbery. The trial court certified that Riggs had no right to

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Nonetheless, Riggs filed a notice of appeal

on Novemb er 27, 2017.

The Court finds that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Tex. R.

App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Riggs also did not file a timely motion f or extension of time to

file his appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. We hold that the Court has no jurisdiction2

over Riggs’ appeal. See Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App.

1998). W e must also dismiss Riggs’ appeal b ecause the trial court’s certification

shows that he d oes not have the right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). T he

appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISS ED.

________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Submitted on January 9, 2018

Opinion Delivered January 10, 2018

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

QUENTIN MILES, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-1120-K

§

INNOVATIVE RECOVERY INC., §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a 

recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed 

the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, 

the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

Signed November 8th, 2022.

_________________________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01120-K-BN Document 11 Filed 11/08/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 35
Order filed June 2, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00226

- CV

____________ HAIQUAN ZHU , Appellant

V.
FIRST COMMUNITY INSU RANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 14

- DCV

- 218025



### O R D E R
Appellant’ s brief was due May 5, 2016

. No brief or motion for extension of
time has been filed.
Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before June 30, 2016 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
#4/n/J•fir , J. 

Douglas/ Cherry 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

STANLEY EARNEST RIMER, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, 

Respondent, 

and 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Real Party in Interest. 

No. 69326 

FILED 

FEB 1 0 2016 

TRACEKAJNOEMAN 

CLERKOFSUPREMECCURT 

DEPUTYCLERK 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

ORDER DENYING PETITION 

This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner 

seeks an order directing the district court to vacate a conviction of child 

neglect. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and 

without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline 

to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See MRS 34.160; NRS 

34.170. A challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction must be 

raised in a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the 

district court in the first instance.' NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1). 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

Parraguirre 

'We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the 

procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34. 

J. 

(0) 1947), 

le-OW/2 
cc: Stanley Earnest Rimer 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A e
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6373-6374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2960]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics; Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of 
Health and Human Services announces the following advisory committee 
meeting.

    Name: National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS).
    Times and Dates:
9:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m., February 23, 2000
9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., February 24, 2000

    Place: Conference Room 703A, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 
Independence Avenue, SW, Washington DC 20201.
    Status: Open.
    Purpose: The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics 
is planning to meet on February 23-24, 2000. The meeting will focus 
on a variety of health data policy and privacy issues. Department 
officials will update the Committee on recent activities of

[[Page 6374]]

the HHS Data Council and the status of HHS activities in 
implementing the administrative simplification provisions of Pub. L. 
104-191, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 
1996 (HIPAA). The Committee also will discuss and take action on its 
annual report to Congress on the Implementation of HIPAA. In 
addition, the Committee will discuss a draft of its forthcoming 
report to HHS on standards for patient medical record information. 
An export panel will discuss summary measures of population health, 
and IOM representatives will brief the Committee on the IOM medical 
errors report. Subcommittee breakout sessions also are planned.
    All topics are tentative and subject to change. Prior to the 
meeting, please check the NCVHS web site, where a detailed agenda 
will be posted when available.
    Contact Person for More Information: Substantive information as 
summaries of NCVHS meetings and a roster of committee members may be 
obtained by visiting the NCVHS website (http://ncvhs.hhs.gov) where 
an agenda for the meeting will be posted when available. Additional 
information may be obtained by calling James Scanlon, NCVHS 
Executive Staff Director, Office of the Assistant Secretary for 
Planning and Evaluation, DHHS, Room 440-D. Humphrey Building, 200 
Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20201, telephone (202) 690-
7100, or Marjorie S. Greenberg, Executive Secretary, NCVHS, NCHS, 
CDC, Room 1100, Presidential Building, 6525 Belcrest Road, 
Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone (301) 458-4245.

    Note:  In the interest of security, the Department has 
instituted stringent procedures for entrance to the Hubert H. 
Humphrey Building by non-government employees. Thus, individuals 
without a government identification card may need to have the guard 
call for an escort to the meeting room.


    Dated: February 2, 2000.
James Scanlon,
Director, Division of Data Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-2960 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4151-04-M
Order entered July 7, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00255-CV

IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF JOYCE MARGOL, AN ALLEGED 

INCAPACITATED PERSON

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-20-02238-2

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s unopposed motion for a seven-day extension 

of time to file his brief. It appears the briefing deadline was triggered before a 

complete appellate record was filed, and a supplemental reporter’s record of a 

hearing held June 7, 2021 remains to be filed. Because the deadline for filing 

appellant’s brief does not begin to run until the record is complete, we GRANT the 

motion to the extent we RESET the deadline for appellant’s brief and ORDER 

Lisabeth Kellett, Official Court Reporter for Probate Court No. 2, to file the 

supplemental reporter’s record of the June 7th hearing no later than July 26, 2021. 
We further ORDER appellant’s brief be filed within thirty days of the filing of the 

supplemental record.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Kellett and the parties.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41153 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MANUEL CRUZ-ISLAS,
Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-263-1

-------------------- August 21, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Manuel Cruz-Islas appeals the 77-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of illegal entry into the United States after deportation in a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment. Cruz-Islas acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. UnitedNo. 00-41153 -2- States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 490; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Cruz-Islas’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6674

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ARTHUR W. PRIVOTT, a/k/a Big Bud,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (CR-98-5; CA-99-73)

Submitted: November 30, 2005 Decided: December 15, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur W. Privott, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Arthur W. Privott seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion after

remand by this court. This order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that the district court’s assessment of his

constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Privott has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny

Privott’s motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smithway Motor Xpress Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
C. Sandvig, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                   /s/ Douglas C. Sandvig
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Douglas C. Sandvig
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   August 14, 2006
Case 4:22-cr-00134-P Document 24 Filed 05/11/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 33
Case 4:22-cr-00134-P Document 24 Filed 05/11/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 34
Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

VS, § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-167-K (01)

§

BRYAN PURYEAR §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry 

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation 

Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections 

thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it 

is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and 

Plea Agreement and the Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty. Sentence will be imposed 

in accordance with the Court’s scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

Signed September 14th

, 2022.

_____________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00167-K Document 20 Filed 09/14/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 45
EXHIBIT 2

Case 4:22-cv-00305-O Document 1-4 Filed 04/13/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID 14
@.cT Corporation Service of Process 

Transmittal 

03/14/2022 

CT Log Number 541225377 

TO: Desiree Beatty 

Aetna, Inc. 

Law U23S, 1425 Union Meeting Road Blue Bell, PA 19422 

RE: Process Served in Texas 

FOR: Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company (Domestic State: CT) 

ENCLOSED ARE COPIES OF LEGAL PROCESS RECEIVED BY THE STATUTORY AGENT OF THE ABOVE COMPANY AS FOLLOWS: 

TITLE OF ACTION: ER NEAR ME vs. AETNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 

DOCUMENT(S) SERVED: -- 

COURT/AGENCY: None Specified Case # JP01225C00015364 

NATURE OF ACTION: Insurance Litigation 

ON WHOM PROCESS WAS SERVED: C T Corporation System, Dallas, TX 

DATE AND HOUR OF SERVICE: By Process Server on 03/14/2022 at 03:17 

JURISDICTION SERVED : Texas 

APPEARANCE OR ANSWER DUE: None Specified 

ATTORNEY (S) / SENDER(S): None Specified 

ACTION ITEMS: CT has retained the current log, Retain Date: 03/15/2022, Expected Purge Date: 03/20/2022 

Image SOP 

Email Notification, Desiree Beatty beattyd@aetna.com 

Email Notification, Jacqueline West westj2@aetna.com 

Email Notification, Piper Taylor plperry@aetna.com 

Email Notification, Kim DePaepe kjdepaepe@aetna.com 

Email Notification, John Baka bakaj@aetna.com 

REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS: C T Corporation System 

1999 Bryan Street 

Suite 900 

Dallas, TX 75201 

800-448-5350 

MajorAccountTeam1@wolterskluwer.com 

The information contained in this Transmittal is provided by CT for quick reference only. It does not constitute a legal opinion, and should not otherwise be 

relied on, as to the nature of action, the amount of damages, the answer date, or any other information contained in the included documents. The recipient(s) 

Page 1 of 2 / JE

Case 4:22-cv-00305-O Document 1-4 Filed 04/13/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID 15
@.cT Corporation Service of Process 

Transmittal 

03/14/2022 

CT Log Number 541225377 

TO: Desiree Beatty 

Aetna, Inc. 

Law U23S, 1425 Union Meeting Road Blue Bell, PA 19422 

RE: Process Served in Texas 

FOR: Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company (Domestic State: CT) 

of this form is responsible for reviewing and interpreting the included documents and taking appropriate action, including consulting with its legal and other 

advisors as necessary. CT disclaims all liability for the information contained in this form, including for any omissions or inaccuracies that may be contained 

therein. 

Page 2 of 2 / JE

Case 4:22-cv-00305-O Document 1-4 Filed 04/13/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID 16
of: rn. 40) 

 

PROCESS SERVER DELIVERY DETAILS 

Wolters Kluwer 

 

 

 

Date: Mon, Mar 14, 2022 

Server Name: Ronald Cobb 

Entity Served Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company 

Case Number JP01225C00015364 

Jurisdiction TX 

 

Case 4:22-cv-00305-O Document 1-4 Filed 04/13/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID 17
Exhibit 32.1



PlanVista Corporation



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Phillip S. Dingle, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PlanVista Corporation (the
Company), and I, Bennett Marks, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1)     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|Dated:    August 12, 2003 |  | /s/ Phillip S. Dingle               
|------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|                          |  | Phillip S. Dingle                   
|                          |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





|Dated:    August 12, 2003 |  | /s/ Bennett Marks                                   
|------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                          |  | Bennett Marks                                       
|                          |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Robert J. Brilon, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of DuraswitchIndustries, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 26, 2004 By: /s/ Robert J. Brilon            Robert J. Brilon   Chairman of the Board, President, ChiefExecutive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,Secretary and Treasurer