alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

EUGENIO VARGAS, 

Plaintiff/Counterclaim 

Defendant, 

v. 

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, et al., 

Defendants/Counterclaim 

Plaintiff. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-430-Y 

Judge Terry R. Means 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Plaintiff Robert “Bob” Ross moves for summary judgment holding Defendants for breach 

of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, breach of union constitution, violations of his rights to free 

speech, association, due process, and wrongful discipline under 29 U.S.C. §§ 411 (a)(2), (a)(5), 

and 529, Intentional Interference with a Contract, and Defamation. The issues arises from a 

confidential transition agreement entered into by the APFA Board of Directors and Plaintiff, and 

Defendants’ allegations of a financial misuse of Plaintiff. The matters required by Local Rule 

56.3(a) are set forth in the Plaintiff’s supporting brief, and an appendix containing the materials 

supporting this motion and brief is being filed separately. 

Case 4:22-cv-00430-Y Document 179 Filed 01/09/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID 4995
Date: January 9, 2024 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Kerri Phillips s

Kerri Phillips, Esq. 

Texas Bar No. 24065906 

Phone: (972) 327-5800 

Email: kerri@kdphillipslaw.com

KD PHILLIPS LAW FIRM, PLLC 

6010 West Spring Creek Parkway 

Plano, Texas 75024 

Fax: (940) 400-0089 

For Service of Filings: 

notice@kdphillipslaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on January 9, 2024 a true and correct copy of the above was served 

on Defendants’ attorneys, via the e-filing manager. 

/S/ Kerri Phillips 

 Kerri Phillips 

Jeffrey Bartos 

Guerrieri, Bartos, & Roma, P.C. 

1900 M Street, NW, Suite 700 

Washington, DC 20036 

Tel: (202) 624-7400; Fax: (202) 624-7420 

Email: jbartos@geclaw.com

Charlette Matts 

In-House Counsel for APFA 

1004 West Euless Blvd 

Euless, TX 76040 

Tel: (682) 301-8454 

Cmatts@apfa.org

Case 4:22-cv-00430-Y Document 179 Filed 01/09/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID 4996
James Sanford 

4803 Gaston Avenue 

Dallas, TX 75249-1020 

Tel: (214) 800-5111; 

Fax: (214) 838-0001 

Email jim@gillespiesanford.com

Email: joe@gillespiesanford.com 

Michael Rake 

Michael R. Rake, Attorney at Law PO Box 1556 

Lake Dallas, TX 75065 Tel.: (940) 498-2103 

Fax: (940) 498-2103 

Email: mrake1@mrakeattorney.com 

Case 4:22-cv-00430-Y Document 179 Filed 01/09/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID 4997
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 122

To designate the month of May 1993, as ‘‘National Foster Care Month’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1993

Mr. ROTH introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the month of May 1993, as ‘‘National Foster

Care Month’’.

Whereas there are more than one-hundred thousand licensed

foster families in the United States who temporarily provide guidance, emotional support, food, shelter, and nurture to children who cannot remain in their own home;

Whereas foster parents devotedly and unselfishly open their

home and family life to children in need;

Whereas foster parents are a vital part in permanency planning to protect the best interests of a foster child;

Whereas foster parents work cooperatively with human service agencies and biological parents to strengthen family

life;
2

•HJ 122 IH

Whereas foster parents must have the commitment of the national, State and local communities in terms of funding,

support, and training; and

Whereas the National Foster Parent Association holds its annual training conference during the month of May 1993:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the month of May 1993, is designated as ‘‘National

4 Foster Care Month’’. The President is requested to issue

5 a proclamation calling on the people of the United States

6 to observe such month with appropriate ceremonies and

7 activities.

Æ
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 35

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas, in 1753, Josiah Hornblower, an English engineer

who was an associate and rival of James Watt, assembled

the 1st functioning steam engine in the Western Hemisphere in Belleville, New Jersey, to pump water from the

Schuyler copper mines;

Whereas, approximately 40 years after such assembly, the 1st

steam engine made in the United States was manufactured in a foundry in Belleville from designs by Josiah

Hornblower;
2

HCON 35 EH

Whereas the designs were commissioned by Nicholas Roosevelt, who was the great-uncle of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Theodore Roosevelt, to power the Polacca,

which was the 1st experimental steamboat in the United

States;

Whereas the Polacca negotiated the Passaic River on October

21, 1798, which was several years before Robert Fulton’s

boat, Clermont, sailed the Hudson River;

Whereas historians herald the invention of the steam engine

as the beginning of the industrial revolution;

Whereas the presence of Josiah Hornblower in Belleville

brought many of the initiators of the industrial revolution

in the United States to Belleville;

Whereas such individuals included members of the Rutgers

family, many of whom are buried in the cemetery of the

old Dutch Reformed Church in Belleville; and

Whereas Belleville has a rightful claim to the title ‘‘Birthplace of the American Industrial Revolution’’: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) the Congress recognizes Belleville, New Jer4 sey, as the birthplace of the industrial revolution in

5 the United States; and
3

HCON 35 EH

1 (2) the President is authorized and requested to

2 issue a proclamation honoring Belleville as such

3 birthplace.

Passed the House of Representatives October 7,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 35

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing Belleville, New Jersey, as the birthStates. place of the industrial revolution in the United
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 313 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 313

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for a technical correction in the enrollment of S. 21.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (S. 21) to designate certain lands 
in the California desert as wilderness, to establish Death Valley, 
Joshua Tree, and Mojave National Parks, and for other purposes, the 
Secretary of the Senate shall make the following correction:
    In the second sentence of section 102(1), strike ``fifteen'' and 
insert ``twenty''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 7 (legislative 
      day, October 6), 1994.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
---

EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Taitron Components Incorporated (the “Company”) for the period endedJune 30, 2010(the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1 ) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 16, 2010


/s/ Stewart WangStewart WangChief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ David VanderhorstDavid VanderhorstChief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


       
<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000941914
<NAME>                        SMITHWAY MOTOR XPRESS CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        1406
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 15814
<ALLOWANCES>                  72
<INVENTORY>                   1277
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              21018
<PP&E>                        85883
<DEPRECIATION>                22244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                89026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         11290
<BONDS>                       37782
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      50
<OTHER-SE>                    31074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  89026
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              33391
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 30898
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            505
<INCOME-PRETAX>               1988
<INCOME-TAX>                  845
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           1143
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  1143
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0.23
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6705

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

EUGENE KENNETH BRINSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:06-cr-00107-HEH; 3:07-cv-00592-HEH)

Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 27, 2010

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Kenneth Brinson, Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Charles 

Young, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Kenneth Brinson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will 

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Brinson has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 195 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 195

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 regarding presidential election voting rights for residents of United 
                          States territories.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1993

 Mr. de Lugo (for himself, Mr. Edwards of California, Mr. Filner, Mr. 
 Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Mfume, Mr. Sabo, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Penny, 
Mrs. Mink, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Clay, Mrs. Collins of Illinois, Mr. Coleman, 
   Mr. Pastor, Mr. Rahall, Ms. Waters, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Hastings, Mr. 
  Berman, Mrs. Meek, Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, Mr. 
 Vento, Mr. de la Garza, Mr. Gonzalez, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. Dellums, 
and Mr. Underwood) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 regarding presidential election voting rights for residents of United 
                          States territories.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote in 
the election for President and Vice President shall not be denied or 
abridged by the United States or by any State on account of residency 
in a territory of the United States.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.

                                 <all>
```
Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

VS, § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-153-K (01)

§

CLARK WOODRUFF CROSS, III §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry 

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation 

Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections 

thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it 

is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and 

Plea Agreement and the Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty. Sentence will be imposed 

in accordance with the Court’s scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

Signed November 2nd, 2022.

_____________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00153-K Document 42 Filed 11/02/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 90
December 7, 2016

Mr. Pierluigi Lanciotti

104 Windchase Drive

Lafayette, LA 70508

Dear Mr. Lanciotti :

Thank you for your 11/09/2016 email requesting the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

cancel Exemption No

. 16633 (Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 2943 )

.

In Exemption No

. 16633 , the operator was granted an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a)

and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1),

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary

to allow the petitioner to conduct UAS operations

.

Your request for cancellation is hereby granted, effective 12/7/2016

.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
Case 2:22-cr-00046-Z-BR Document 344 Filed 01/09/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1014
SUMMARY OF 14 C.F.R. 243 PROCEDURES 

EUROATLANTIC AIRWAYS-TRANSPORTES AEREOS, S.A. 

Introduction 

This summary is submitted by Euroatlantic Airways-Transportes Aereos, S.A. 

("Euroatlantic") to the U.S. Department of Transportation in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 243. 

Summary of Procedures 

For each covered flight segment, Euroatlantic shall collect, or cause to be collected, the 

full name of each passenger who is a U.S. citizen. Any U.S. citizen who does not provide this 

information will not be permitted to board. 

Euroatlantic will request an emergency contact telephone number and name from U.S. 

citizen passengers. As the provision of this information is voluntary, Euroatlantic will not deny 

boarding to any passenger who refuses to provide it. 

Euroatlantic shall store the information collected pursuant to the above procedures until 

passengers on the covered flight segment disembark. This information will be kept confidential 

and will not be used for purposes other than those described herein or disclosed to any entity 

except as required and permitted by law. 

In the event of an aviation disaster, Euroatlantic shall contact the Managing Director of 

Overseas Citizen Services, Bureau of Consular Affairs, U.S. State Department, by telephone. Not 

later than three hours after confirmation of such a disaster, Euroatlantic shall transmit to the U.S. 

State Department and, upon request, the National Transportation Safety Board, the information 

collected in accordance with these procedures. 

24 Hour Contact Information 

Euroatlantic's 24-hour operations center is located in Lisbon. Any agent of the U.S. 

government may contact operations center personnel at any time by dialing •••••••• 

via email at
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ADAM PRUDHOMME,

Plaintiff,

VS.

MARCUS MICHLES, ET AL.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:22-CV-1382-G-BN

)

)

)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a

recommendation in this case. Objections were filed. The district court reviewed de

novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to

which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings,

conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the court

ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

July 19, 2022.

________________________________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-01382-G-BN Document 7 Filed 07/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 72
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Diversified Futures Fund Limited Partnership and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                     101,436,151
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  379,458<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             105,325,179<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               105,325,179<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,799,714<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,509,602
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,709,888)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,709,888)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,709,888)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $329,328, and due
from DWR of $50,130.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $3,509,570.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $1,752,834, accrued
management fee of $262,881, and administrative expenses payable
of $143,056.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $(2,954,881),
net change in unrealized of $1,725,281 and interest income of $3,029,314.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 147/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 147 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 625 June 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 147

English edition

Legislation

Volume 625 June 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2019/854 of 15 April 2019 on the conclusion of the Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam on forest law enforcement, governance and trade | 1 |
| | * | Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam on forest law enforcement, governance and trade | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2019/854 of 15 April 2019 on the conclusion of the Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam on forest law enforcement, governance and trade

1

*

Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam on forest law enforcement, governance and trade

Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam on forest law enforcement, governance and trade

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.