66690 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 7, 2000 / Notices

3. Contracts for financial and legal

advisors to the Privatization Committee.

4. Allowance for loan losses reserve.

5. Schedule for stockholders’ meeting

in year 2001.

6. Administrative issues.

ACTION: Board of Directors Meeting.

TIME AND DATE: 9:00 a.m., Friday,

November 17, 2000.

PLACE: Room 104–A, The Williamsburg

Room, Department of Agriculture, 12th

Jefferson Drive, SW, Washington, DC.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The

following matters have been placed on

the agenda for the Board of Directors

meeting:

1. Call to order.

2. Report on board election results.

3. Oath of office.

4. Election of board officers:

Chairperson, Vice Chair, Secretary, and

Treasurer.

5. Action on Minutes of the August 4,

2000, board meeting.

6. Report on loans approved in FY

2000.

7. Report on financial activity for FY

2000.

8. Report on the allowance for loan

losses reserve.

9. Privatization Committee report.

10. Consideration of resolution to

reestablish the Privatization Committee.

11. Consideration of resolution to

approve Anthony Haynes to serve as the

Deputy Governor of the Bank.

12. Establish date and location of next

board meeting.

13. Adjournment.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Roberta D. Purcell, Assistant Governor,

Rural Telephone Bank, (202) 720–9554.

Dated: November 2, 2000.

Anthony C. Haynes,

Acting Governor, Rural Telephone Bank.

[FR Doc. 00–28662 Filed 11–3–00; 2:43 pm]

BILLING CODE 3410–15–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Information for Certification Under

FAQ 6 of the Safe Harbor Privacy

Principles

ACTION: Proposed collection; comment

request.

SUMMARY: The Department of

Commerce, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork and

respondent burdens, invites the general

public and other Federal agencies to

take this opportunity to comment on the

continuing information collections, as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13 (44

U.S.C. 35068 (2)(A)).

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted on or before January 8, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments

to Madeleine Clayton, Departmental

Forms Clearance Officer, Department of

Commerce, Room 6086, 14th &

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC 20230 (or via the Internet at

MClayton@doc.gov).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Request for additional information or

copies of the information collection

instrument and instructions should be

directed to: Jeff Rohlmeier, Trade

Development, Room 2011, 14th &

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC 20230; Phone number: (202) 482–

1614 and fax number: (202) 501–2548.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Abstract

In response to the European

Commission Directive on Data

Protection that restricts transfers of

personal information from Europe to

countries whose privacy practices are

not deemed ‘‘adequate,’’ the U.S.

Department of Commerce has developed

a ‘‘safe harbor’’ framework that will

allow U.S. organizations to satisfy the

European Directive’s requirements and

ensure that personal data flows to the

United States are not interrupted. In this

process, the Department of Commerce

repeatedly consulted with U.S.

organizations affected by the European

directive and interested nongovernment organizations.

On July 27, 2000, the European

Commission issued its decision, in

accordance with Article 25.6 of the

Directive, that the Safe Harbor Privacy

Principles provide adequate privacy

protection. The safe harbor framework

bridges the differences between the

European Union (EU) and U.S.

approaches to privacy protection. Under

the safe harbor privacy framework,

information is being collected in order

to create a list of the organizations that

have self-certified to the Principles.

Organizations that have signed up to

this list are deemed ‘‘adequate’’ under

the Directive and do not have to provide

further documentation to European

officials. This list will be used by

European Union organizations to

determine whether further information

and contracts will be needed for a U.S.

organization to receive personally

identifiable information. The decision to

enter the safe harbor is entirely

voluntary. Organizations that decide to

participate in the safe harbor must

comply with the safe harbor’s

requirements and publicly declare that

they do so.

To be assured of safe harbor benefits,

an organization needs to self certify

annually to the Department of

Commerce, in writing, that it agrees to

adhere to the safe harbor’s requirements,

which includes elements such as notice,

choice, access, and enforcement. It must

also state in its published privacy policy

statement that it adheres to the safe

harbor.

This list will be used by European

Union organizations to determine

whether further information and

contracts will be needed by a U.S.

organization to receive personally

identifiable information. It will be used

by the European Data Protection

Authorities to determine whether a

company is providing ‘‘adequate’’

protection, and whether a company has

requested to cooperate with the Data

Protection Authority.

The list will also be accessed when

there is a complaint logged in the EU

against a U.S. organization, and used by

the Federal Trade Commission and the

Department of Transportation to

determine whether a company is part of

the safe harbor. It will be accessed if a

company is practicing ‘‘unfair and

deceptive’’ practices and has

misrepresented itself to the public. In

addition, the list will be used by the

Department of Commerce and the

European Commission to determine if

organizations are signing up to the list

on a regular basis.

II. Method of Collection

The information collection form will

be provided via the Internet at http://

www.export.gov/SafeHarbor and by mail

to requesting U.S. firms.

III. Data

OMB Number: 0625–0239.

Form Number: N/A.

Type of Review: Regular submission.

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

1,500.

Estimated Time Per Response: 20

minutes—website; and 40 minutes—

letter.

Estimated Total Annual Burden

Hours: 550 hours.

Estimated Total Annual Costs to

Public: $19,0250.

IV. Request for Comments

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether

the proposed collection of information

is necessary for the proper performance

of the functions of the agency, including

whether the information shall have

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 7, 2000 / Notices 66691

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden

(including hours and costs) of the

proposed collection of information; (c)

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the

burden of the collection of information

on respondents, including through the

use of automated collection techniques

or forms of information technology.

Comments submitted in response to

this notice will be summarized and/or

included in the request for OMB

approval of this information collection;

they also will become a matter of public

record.

Dated: November 1, 2000.

Gwellnar Banks,

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief

Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 00–28474 Filed 11–6–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–351–605]

Frozen Concentrated Orange Juice

from Brazil; Amended Final Results of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 7, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irina

Itkin, AD/CVD Enforcement Group I,

Office 2, Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202)

482–0656.

Applicable Statute and Regulations

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the Act are references to the

provisions effective January 1, 1995, the

effective date of the amendments made

to the Act by the Uruguay Round

Agreements Act (URAA). In addition,

unless otherwise indicated, all citations

to the Department’s regulations are to 19

CFR part 351 (1999).

Amendment to Final Results

In accordance with section 751(a) of

the Act, on October 11, 2000, the

Department published the final results

of the 1998–1999 administrative review

on frozen concentrated orange juice

(FCOJ) from Brazil, in which we

determined that U.S. sales of FCOJ from

Brazil were made at less than normal

value (65 FR 60406). On October 12,

2000, we received an allegation, timely

filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(c)(2),

from the respondent, Citrovita Agro

Industrial Ltda./Cambuhy MC Industrial

Ltda./Cambuhy Citrus Comercial e

Exportadora (collectively ‘‘Citrovita’’),

that the Department made a ministerial

error in its final results. We received

comments on this allegation from the

petitioners on October 18, 2000.

After analyzing Citrovita’s submission

and the petitioners’ comments, we have

determined, in accordance with 19 CFR

351.224, that a ministerial error was

made in our final margin calculations

for Citrovita. Specifically, we find that

we failed to apply the proper U.S.

dollar/Brazilian real exchange rate from

January 13, 1999, through April 2, 1999,

as outlined in the Concurrence

Memorandum dated May 30, 2000. For

a detailed discussion of the ministerial

error, as well as the Department’s

analysis, see the memorandum to Louis

Apple from the Team, dated October 31,

2000.

Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR

351.224(e), we are amending the final

results of the 1998–1999 antidumping

duty administrative review on FCOJ

from Brazil. The revised dumping

margin is as follows:

Exporter/manufacturer

Original final

margin

percentage

Revised final

margin

percentage

Citrovita Agro Industrial Ltda./Cambuhy MC Industrial Ltda./Cambuhy Citrus Comercial e Exportadora ............. 25.87 14.77

Scope of the Review

The merchandise covered by this

review is FCOJ from Brazil. The

merchandise is currently classifiable

under item 2009.11.00 of the

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS

item number is provided for

convenience and for customs purposes.

The Department’s written description of

the scope of this proceeding remains

dispositive.

This administrative review and notice

are in accordance with sections

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.

Dated: October 31, 2000.

Troy H. Cribb,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 00–28565 Filed 11–6–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–570–803]

Heavy Forged Hand Tools, Finished or

Unfinished, With or Without Handles,

From the People’s Republic of China;

Preliminary Results and Preliminary

Partial Recission of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Reviews and Notice of

Intent Not To Revoke in Part

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Preliminary Results

and Preliminary Partial Recission of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Reviews and Notice of Intent Not To

Revoke in Part of Heavy Forged Hand

Tools, Finished or Unfinished, With or

Without Handles, From the People’s

Republic of China.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

(‘‘the Department’’) has preliminarily

determined that sales by the

respondents in these reviews covering

the period February 1, 1999 through

January 31, 2000, have been made below

normal value (‘‘NV’’). If these

preliminary results are adopted in our

final results of reviews, we will instruct

the U.S. Customs Service (‘‘Customs’’)

to assess antidumping duties on all

appropriate entries.

The Department invites interested

parties to comment on these preliminary

results.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 7, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Frank Thomson or Howard Smith, AD/

CVD Enforcement, Office 4, Group II,

Import Administration, International