alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      16,710,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,989,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,339,000
<PP&E>                                   1,650,517,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              51,770,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,666,113,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       30,553,000
<BONDS>                                    589,053,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                121,809,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 924,698,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,666,113,000
<SALES>                                     56,055,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            57,776,000
<CGS>                                       15,342,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,584,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,080,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,035,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             19,077,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         19,077,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              3,973,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                15,104,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
        

</TABLE>
Annual Statement of Compliance

For the Period of January 1,2023 through December 31, 2023 (Reporting Period)

 

**Re: Transactions Identifiedin Appendix A**

 

I, Greg Chastain, in my capacityas Chief Operating Officer of Mount Street US (Georgia) LLP (MSUS), do herebystate that:

 

·        A review of the Special Servicingactivities of MSUS during the Reporting Period and of its performance,pertaining to the Transactions and the related Servicing Agreements listed inAppendix A, has been made under my supervision, and,

 

·        To the best of my knowledge, basedon such review, MSUS has fulfilled all of its obligations pertaining to theTransactions and the related Servicing Agreements listed in Appendix A in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Date: February 29, 2024

 

By: /s/ Greg Chastain

Name: Greg Chastain

Title: Chief Operating Officer

 

 

Appendix A

 

 

| **Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Certificates** | **Applicable Reporting Period**        | **MSUS Role**    |
|---------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|------------------|
| BX TRUST2019-MMP                                  | January 1, 2023 to January 31, 2023    | Special Servicer |
| BAMMLL 2021-JACX                                  | January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023   | Special Servicer |
| HMH 2017-NSS                                      | January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023   | Special Servicer |
| MSBAM 2015-C21                                    | January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023   | Special Servicer |
| NCMS 2018-FL1                                     | January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023   | Special Servicer |
| COMM 2015-CCRE23                                  | January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023   | Special Servicer |
| JPMC 2013-C16                                     | January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023   | Special Servicer |
| BANK 2018-BNK13                                   | January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023   | Special Servicer |
| CGCMT 2023-SMART                                  | May 24, 2023 to December 31, 2023      | Special Servicer |
| CGCMT 2023-PRM3                                   | June 29, 2023 to December 31, 2023     | Special Servicer |
| COAST 2023-2HTL                                   | July 25, 2023 to December 31, 2023     | Special Servicer |
| GSMS 2023-SHIP                                    | August 23, 2023 to December 31, 2023   | Special Servicer |
| UBS 2019-C16                                      | October 30, 2023 to December 31, 2023  | Special Servicer |
| BBCMS 2019-BWAY                                   | November 6, 2023 to December 31, 2023  | Special Servicer |
| BX 2023-XL3                                       | December 21, 2023 to December 31, 2023 | Special Servicer |
# QSBL 093017

# QSBL 063017

# QSBL 033117

# QSBL 123116

# QSBL 093016

# QSBL 063016

# QSBL 033116

# QSBL 123115

# QSBL 093015

# QSBL 063015

# QSBL 033115

# QSBL 123114

# QSBL 093014

# QSBL 063014

# QSBL 033114

# QSBL 123113

# QSBL 093013

# QSBL 063013

# QSBL 033113

# QSBL 123112

# QSBL 093012

# QSBL 063012

# QSBL 033112

# QSBL 123111

# QSBL 093011

# QSBL 063011

# QSBL 033111

# image1.png
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1537/2005

of 22 September 2005         

fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, undenatured and exported in the natural state, are hereby fixed to the amounts shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 September 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 September 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 214, 8.9.1995, p. 16.

----

ANNEX

REFUNDS ON WHITE SUGAR AND RAW SUGAR EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 23 SEPTEMBER 2005 (1)

----

(1)  The amounts set out in this Annex are not applicable with effect from 1 February 2005 pusrsuant to Council Decision 2005/45/EC of 22 December 2004 concerning the conclusion and the provisional application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation amending the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products (OJ L 23, 26.1.2005, p. 17).

(1)  This amount is applicable to raw sugar with a yield of 92 %. Where the yield for exported raw sugar differs from 92 %, the refund amount applicable shall be calculated in accordance with Article 28(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.

----
ex10-15.htm


 

Exhibit 10.15

 

amendment to amended AGREEMENT

 

OCTOBER 1, 2014

 

The Amended Agreement effective as of January 25, 2005 between LSI INDUSTRIES INC. (“LSI”) and JAMES P. SFERRA (“Sferra”) (which amended in its entirety an Agreement between such parties entered into on September 3, 2003) is hereby amended as follows: 

 

The first three sentences of paragraph 1 of the Amended Agreement are hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

 

“Sferra's transition from fulltime employment shall commence on such date as Sferra shall be notified in writing that LSI has hired a Chief Technology Officer or other senior executive who will provide to LSI the management services that Sferra currently provides. Thereafter, for the next three years, Sferra shall remain an active employee of LSI and receive the same benefits furnished to senior executive officers of LSI. As compensation for his continued employment, Sferra shall be paid for his services in each year at annual rates of 60%, 50% and 40%, respectively, of the average of his last five full fiscal years' compensation; provided, however, for the first six months following such transition, Sferra shall be paid at the same rate that he is being paid as of the date on which such notice is given to Sferra. Thereafter, for the next six months, he will be paid at the 60% rate set forth above and in subsequent years as set forth above.”

 

Upon receipt of such notice, Sferra shall resign as LSI’s Executive Vice President-Manufacturing and relocate his office to a new location in LSI’s headquarters designed by the Company. Sferra shall continue to serve as a Director of LSI until further action by LSI’s Board or Shareholders.

 

Except as specifically modified herein, the terms and conditions of the Amended Agreement are ratified and confirmed as of this date.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, LSI and Sferra have executed this Amendment to Amended Agreement on the date set forth above.

 

LSI INDUSTRIES INC.

 

 

 

By: /s/ Ronald S. Stowell                                                                  

 

By: /s/ Mark A. Serrianne                                                                 

 

 

/s/ James P. Sferra                                                                              

James P. Sferra
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 21404.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 29, 1941.

J. R. Bogard, of San Augustine, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidsop, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to murder, and his punishment assessed at one year’s confinement in the penitentiary.

This cause comes before us without any statement of facts. We find in the record some objections and exceptions to the court’s charge before same was read to the jury, as well as some matters contained in *253the motion for a new trial alleged to be errors committed upon the trial of this cause, none of which we can correctly appraise on account of the absence of a statement of facts.

All matters of procedure appearing regular, the judgment will be affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 127 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 127

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 22 (legislative Day, April 19), 1993

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
To authorize the President to proclaim the last Friday of April 1993 as 
                        ``National Arbor Day''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the President is hereby 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation designating the last 
Friday of April 1993 as ``National Arbor Day'' and calling upon the 
people of the United States to observe such a day with appropriate 
ceremonies and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 21, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29544]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--J Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 20, 2000, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), J Consortium, Inc. has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership 
status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Cardsoft, 
Inc., Mountain View, CA; Centro Ricerche Fiat-CRF, Orbassano, Italy; 
Enea Realtime AB, Taby, Sweden; Pacific Numerics, San Diego, CA; Mecel 
AB, Gothenburg, Sweden; Metawave Video Systems, Ltd., Newbury, 
Berkshire, United Kingdom; Michael Barr, Silver Spring, MD; William N. 
Locke, Bethel Park, PA; and Joe Sexton, San Jose, CA have been added as 
parties to this venture. Also, UK Ministry of Defence, Weymouth, United 
Kingdom has been dropped as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and J Consortium, Inc. intends to file 
additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On August 9, 1999, J Consortium, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on March 21, 2000 (65 FR 15175).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 21, 
2000. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on August 11, 2000 (65 FR 49263).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-29544 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
NO. 07-12-0349-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C AUGUST 7, 2012

__________________ ____________ IN RE ELIGAH DARNELL, JR., RELATOR

__________________ _______________ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION By this original proceeding, Relator, Elig ah Darnell, Jr., an in mate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Potter County District Clerk, Caroline Woodburn, to file his ci vil complaint pursuant to chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. For the reasons expressed herein, we deny Relator's request and dismiss his petition for wr it of mandamus for w ant of jurisdiction. This Court has the authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county court in our district and all writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. ' 22.221(b) (West 2004). In order fo r a district clerk to fall within our jurisdictional reach, it must be estab lished that the issuanc e of the writ of mandamus is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. In re Coronado , 980 S.W.2d 691, 692-93 (Tex.App.

B San Antonio 1998, no pet.). Relato r has not demonstrated that the2 exercise of our mandamus authority against the Potter County District Clerk is appropriate to enforce our jurisdiction. Consequently, we have no authority to issue a writ of mandamus aga inst Caroline Woodburn. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Patrick A. Pirtle Justice
#### DILLINGHAM v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 6, 1952.

*828William F. Bennett, Owensboro, for ap-. pellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Zeb A. Stewart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

COMBS, Justice.

Anna Louise Dillingham has filed motion for an appeal from a judgment sentencing her to 90 days in jail on a charge of involuntary manslaughter. The indictment charged her with contributing to the death of Ronald Hope, a two-year old child, by surreptitiously abandoning her duties as a “baby sitter” and.going out on a date with a soldier. During her absence the house in which Ronald and his sister, age 21 months, were asleep caught fire and the children suffocated.

No supersedeas bond was executed and it appears from the record that appellant has served the jail sentence pronounced 'by the court. The Attorney General has filed motion to dismiss the appeal as moot. In response to the motion, appellant states she is now in jail in default of bond on an indictment charging her with the death of Ronald’s sister, and it is suggested that we should write an opinion in this case for the benefit of the circuit court in the trial of the other case.

Clearly, the case is moot. Since appellant has already satisfied the sentence of the. court, we could make no order on this appeal which would affect her status. We cannot remit the jail sentence already served, and even if we should decide the sentence should not have have been imposed, the opinion could not afford appellant any effectual relief in this case.

This Court has always adhered to the fundamental policy that it has ho mandate from the Constitution or the Legislature to engage in the discussion of purely academic or moot questions. The rule is based on the historical premise that it is the duty of courts to try actual controversies between litigants, and not tó disseminate gratuitous advice. The possibility that a gratuitous opinion might be of assistance in future litigation does not change the rule or minimize the reason for the rule.

 If appellant is convicted on the indictment now pending, the statute provides an adequate method 'by which she may bring her case to this Court for review. If, as stated by counsel, she cannot comply with the terms of the statute as to execution of an appeal bond, the answer is that an appeal is a privilege and not an inherent right. As a condition precedent to the exercise of the privilege, the litigant must comply with the statute under which the appeal is granted. Regardless of the question of appeal, appellant still has the protection of the constitutional mandate which guarantees her a fair and impartial trial by a jury of her peers in a lawfully constituted court.

It was held in the case of Hudspeth v. Commonwealth, 204 Ky. 606, 265 S.W. 18, that an appeal would be dismissed which was perfected solely for the purpose of testing the legality of a jail sentence which had already been served. We reaffirm that ruling.

The appeal is dismissed.
**Officer’s Certificate**

 

 

Pursuant to the requirementsof the applicable Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule Ihereto, for which Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,as Master Servicer, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC, as Servicer, theundersigned, Ellen D. Miller, as Managing Director and Head of Servicing ofBerkeley Point Capital LLC, hereby certifies subject to any limitations listedon Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, solely in her capacity as anofficer and not in her individual capacity, as follows:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the “ReportingPeriod”) and of its performance under the Agreement has been made undermy supervision; and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 22nd day of February, 2017.

 

 

Berkeley Point Capital LLC

 

/s/ Ellen D. Miller

Ellen D. Miller

Managing Director, Head ofServicing

 

 

**Schedule I**

 

 

Multifamily Pass-Through Certificates,Berkeley Point Capital LLC as ***Sub-Servicer***:

 

Series 2009-K4

Series 2010-K5

Series 2011-K10

Series 2011-K12

Series 2012-K709

Series 2012-KF01

Series 2013-K24

Series 2013-KF02

Series 2014-KF03

Series 2014-K503

Series 2014-KF06

Series 2015-KF07

Series 2015-KF08

Series 2015-KF09

Series 2015-KF10

Series 2015-KF12

Series 2016-KF13

Series 2016-KF16

Series 2016-KSW1

Series 2016-KF18

Series 2016-KF26

 

 

Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital LLC as ***Primary Servicer***:

 

COMM 2014-CCRE17 MortgageTrust

COMM 2014-CCRE19 MortgageTrust

GS Mortgage Securities Trust2014-GC24

COMM 2014-UBS4 Mortgage Trust

COMM 2015-CCRE23 MortgageTrust

COMM 2015-CCRE27 MortgageTrust

GS Mortgage Securities Trust2015-GC30

COMM 2015-HULA

COMM 2015-LC19 Mortgage Trust

COMM 2015-LC21 Mortgage Trust

GS Mortgage Securities Trust2015-GS1

CCRESG 2016 HEAT MortgageTrust

Citigroup 2016-C3 MortgageTrust

CFCRE 2016-C7 Mortgage Trust
Ganv R. Henaenr

GovERNoR

Enclosures

Srern oF UrAH

Orrrce oF THE GovenNon

Saur Lere Ctrv, UrAH

a4t t4-???o

SpeNcen J. Cox

LTEUTENANT GovERNoR

September 22,2015

Shaun McGrath, Regional Administrator

U.S. EPA Region 8

1595 Wynkoop Street

Denver, Colorado 80202-1 129

Dear Mr. McGrath:

On May 20,2014, the state of Utah submiued R307-103, Administrative Procedures,for

your review and approval into the Utah State Implementation Plan (SIP). Working with your

staff, we have determined that R307-103 is not federally required to be in the Utah SIP. Because

it has not yet been approved by the EPA for inclusion into the SIP, Utah hereby withdraws its

submittal of the rule.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

Sincerely,

bl*L(LhtCu.yS.Herbert

Governor
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 50

To provide for the display of the flag commemorating the 50th Anniversary

of World War II in the rotunda of the Capitol.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1993

Mr. SKELTON (for himself and Mr. EMERSON) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To provide for the display of the flag commemorating the

50th Anniversary of World War II in the rotunda of

the Capitol.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), The Architect of the Capitol, under the direc3 tion of the Speaker of the House of Representatives and

4 the President pro tempore of the Senate, shall take all

5 necessary steps for the display of the flag commemorating

6 the 50th Anniversary of World War II in the rotunda of

7 the Capitol until November 11, 1995.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                 ------------





               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Integrated Data Corp (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David C. Bryan, President and acting Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of Integrated Data Corp.


Date:  December 28, 2007        By:  /s/ David C. Bryan
                                     ------------------
                                     David C. Bryan
                                     President and acting
                                     Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Integrated Data Corp. and
will be retained by Integrated Data Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.