alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 62 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 62

                Encouraging employee achievement awards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1993

 Mr. Goodling submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
                Encouraging employee achievement awards.

Whereas the Nation is recovering from a prolonged recession which requires 
        businesses to continue to find ways to increase productivity and quality 
        to enable this country to ready its work force for the year 2000,
Whereas businesses should seek ideas from their employees on improving 
        productivity, quality, efficiency, and competitiveness, which would 
        advance the overall ideas of total quality management, and
Whereas businesses should encourage employees to offer such ideas through 
        monetary and other rewards: Now, therefore, be it,
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That businesses should offer monetary awards to employees who offer 
ideas to improve productivity, quality, efficiency, and 
competitiveness; and Congress should encourage such awards by enacting 
significant tax incentives for employees to contribute to business 
productivity and quality and for businesses to reward such 
contributions.

                                 <all>
```
U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

Press Release: September 22, 2017

Contact: Public Affairs (202) 622-2960 

Readout of Financial Stability Oversight Council Meeting

WASHINGTON – U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin today convened a meeting of the 

Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) in an executive session at the U.S. Department 

of the Treasury. 

During the meeting, the Council discussed the ongoing annual reevaluation of its designation of 

a nonbank financial company.

The Council also voted to approve the minutes of its previous meeting on July 28.

Additional information regarding the Council, its work, and meeting minutes is available at 

http://www.fsoc.gov

 

###
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Co-Brand



 Exhibit 10.1 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

AMENDED AND RESTATED CO-BRAND AND PRIVATE LABEL CREDIT CARD PROGRAM 

AGREEMENT 
 This First Amendment to the
Amended and Restated Co-Brand and Private Label Credit Card Program Agreement (this “First Amendment”), effective as of June 19, 2015 is entered into by and between Synchrony Bank (formerly “GE Capital Retail Bank”)
(“Bank”) and Stein Mart, Inc. (“Retailer”) (the “Agreement”) 
 WHEREAS, Retailer and the Bank have
entered into the Agreement, dated October 3, 2011, pursuant to which the Bank issues Co-Brand and Private Label Credit Cards to Retailer’s customers; 

WHEREAS, Retailer and Bank now wish to amend the Agreement to include the terms set forth herein. 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt, adequacy and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows intending to be legally bound: 
 1. Unless otherwise expressly defined in
this First Amendment, all capitalized terms herein will have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. 
 2. Schedule 10.2(p)
(Financial Covenants). The parties agree that Section A of Schedule 10.2(p) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting Section A in its entirety and replacing it with the following new Section: 

“A. Financial Covenants: 

Debt to Equity Ratio: Retailer shall maintain on a consolidated basis, as of the end of each fiscal quarter of Retailer, a Debt to
Equity Ratio of not more than 3.5 to 1.0. 
 Minimum Tangible Net Worth: The Tangible Net Worth of Retailer on a consolidated basis,
as of the end of each fiscal quarter of Retailer, shall not be less than $50,000,000.” 
 3. Except as expressly provided in this First
Amendment, nothing in this First Amendment will be deemed to waive or modify any of the provisions of the Agreement, or any amendment or addendum to the Agreement. To the extent that any conflict or inconsistency exists between the terms of this
First Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of this First Amendment will control. 
 4. This First Amendment will be governed by the laws
of the State of Delaware, without regard to its or any other jurisdiction’s principles of conflict of law. 
 5. This First Amendment
may be executed in counterparts, each of which, when so executed, will be deemed an original, provided that all such counterparts will be regarded as one and the same document. 

[Signature Page to Follow] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment as of the dates set forth below. 

 

			
	SYNCHRONY BANK
		
	By	 	/s/ Margaret M. Keane
		
	Its	 	President & Chief Executive Officer
		
	Date	 	 
	
	STEIN MART, INC.
		
	By	 	/s/ Gregory W. Kleffner
		
	Its	 	Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
		
	Date	 	6/22/15
.••;:-::TOPERATtoiN3 

2jil ;iiR -<^ A \l- 1 5 

Currier's Flyin g Service, Inc. 

P.O. Bo x 351 

Greenville Jet , Maine 04442 

To: U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave. 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Petition For Exemption 

a. Currier's Flying Service, Inc. 

P.O. Box 351 

Greenville Jet, Maine 04442 

E-mail: roger@curriersflyingservice.com 

Telephone: 207-695-2778 

b. Currier's Flying Service, Inc. seeks exemption from 14CFR part 

120.117(2)(ii)&(iii) and 120.226(b)(2)(ii)&(iii), which require an 

operator conducting FAR 135 charter operations and FAR 

91.147 air tour operations to impliment separate and distinct drug 

and alcohol testing programs. 

c. Currier's Flying Service, Inc. is a small company conducting both 

FAR135 and FAR 91 air tour operations with the same fleet of 

aircraft with same pilots, operating from the same seaplane base. 

We currently operate 3 aircraft with 1 or 2 pilots, and 1 office person 

only during the summer months. To have two separate drug and 

alcohol testing programs would be counterproductive and would not 

enhance safety. 

d. Having two programs only adds to the burden of 

conducting safe operations and introduces the potential for errors, 

and adding to our basic overhead costs, which ultimately gets 

passed on to our customers. We have been operating with one 

drug testing program since the beginning of regulations pertaining 
to the program, with no compliance problems, and we intend to 

continue this way. Granting the requested exemption would not 

increase the level of safety as all employees who perform safety 

sensitive functions are on our company's approved program. 

e. Currier's Flying Service, Inc. does not wish to exercise the 

priviledges of this requested exemption outside of the U.S. 

Sincerely, 

Roger L. Currier, President 

Currier's Flying Service, Inc.
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 1 of 37 PageID 1
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 2 of 37 PageID 2
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 3 of 37 PageID 3
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 4 of 37 PageID 4
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 5 of 37 PageID 5
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 6 of 37 PageID 6
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 7 of 37 PageID 7
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 8 of 37 PageID 8
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 9 of 37 PageID 9
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 10 of 37 PageID 10
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 11 of 37 PageID 11
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 12 of 37 PageID 12
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 13 of 37 PageID 13
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 14 of 37 PageID 14
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 15 of 37 PageID 15
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 16 of 37 PageID 16
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 17 of 37 PageID 17
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 18 of 37 PageID 18
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 19 of 37 PageID 19
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 20 of 37 PageID 20
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 21 of 37 PageID 21
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 22 of 37 PageID 22
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 23 of 37 PageID 23
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 24 of 37 PageID 24
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 25 of 37 PageID 25
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 26 of 37 PageID 26
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 27 of 37 PageID 27
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 28 of 37 PageID 28
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 29 of 37 PageID 29
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 30 of 37 PageID 30
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 31 of 37 PageID 31
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 32 of 37 PageID 32
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 33 of 37 PageID 33
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 34 of 37 PageID 34
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 35 of 37 PageID 35
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 36 of 37 PageID 36
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ Document 1 Filed 04/05/22 Page 37 of 37 PageID 37
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address

76.186.147.252,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Case No. 3:22-cv-01210-K

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE OF JOHN DOE 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, 

LLC hereby gives notice that its claims in this action against Defendant John Doe, subscriber 

assigned IP address 76.186.147.252, are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: August 25, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Paul S. Beik

Paul S. Beik

 Beik Law Firm PLLC

 917 Franklin Street, Suite 220

 Houston, Texas 77002

 Tel: (713) 869-6975

 Fax: (713) 583-9169

 paul@beiklaw.com

 www.beiklaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF,

STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC

Case 3:22-cv-01210-K Document 11 Filed 08/25/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 77
#### BARNARD et al. v. THOMPSON.

No. 2383—7793.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.

Jan. 7, 1942.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 11, 1942.

Tarlton & Vaughan, B. D. Tarlton, Charles L. Hale, Jr., and I. M. Singer, all of Corpus Christi, for plaintiffs in error.

Bryan Blalock, of Texarkana, and W. R. Smith, Jr., of Austin, for defendant in error.

HARVEY, Commissioner.

This is a suit by J. B. Thompson against Dr. W. C. Barnard and two other physicians, constituting a partnership. The suit was commenced December 6, 1935, and its object is the recovery of damages resulting from the negligence of the defendants which occurred in connection with a surgical operation performed by them on Lelia Thompson, the wife of the plaintiff. The operation was performed on January 6, 1930. In proper performance of the operation, the surgeon made an incision in Mrs. Thompson’s abdomen and inserted a number of gauze sponges in the abdomen. The surgeon negligently failed to remove two of the gauze sponges from the abdomen and they remained there after the operation was concluded and the incision closed. The fact that the gauze had been left inside her body was not discovered by Mrs. Thompson until June 27, 1935, six months before this suit was commenced. The discovery occurred when a second operation was performed by a different surgeon. All these facts appear in the plaintiff’s petition. The defendants, by special exception, invoked the statute of two years limitation, Article 5526. The trial court sustained the special exception and dismissed the suit. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause. 142 S.W.2d 238.

The action of the Court of Civil Appeals is correct, for the reason that the plaintiff’s petition contains a paragraph which reads as follows:

“Plaintiff alleges that during said operation and at any and all times after said operation the defendants herein, well knowing of the presence of said gauze in the body of plaintiff’s said wife, fraudulently concealed from plaintiff and plaintiff’s said wife the presence of said gauze sponges which they had placed in the body of the said Lelia Thompson, and fraudulently concealed from them the necessity of removing the same.”

The defendant made no complaint in the trial court, by special exception or otherwise, of any defect of form in respect to this paragraph. It is sufficient as a pleading to tender the issue of fraudulent concealment by the defendants of the plaintiff’s cause of action from the time it arose until the gauze sponge was discovered in Mrs. Thompson’s body on July 27, 1935. Owen v. King, 130 Tex. 614, 111 S.W.2d 695, 114 A.L.R. 859.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals reversing the trial court’s judgment and remanding the cause is affirmed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
April 16 , 2015

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx Secretary of Transportation US Department of Tran s portation 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590
Dear Secretary Foxx , 2 6 U ni o n**rr ~c** **r** S outh, P. O

. Box 30 8 , C oncord, NC 2802 6-**on co** **rdn c.** **·**

As yo u know 

### II million Americans rely on a healthy , competitive airline industry for their live lihood

- many of them in North Carolina

- the birthplace of aviation. That is why I was alarmed to hear recently that the governments of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates were providing unfair subsidies to their state-owned airlines,jeopardizing the American airline industry and jobs here at home.
Over th e course of the last ten years, Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline have received over 

### $40 billion in unfair subsidies, including interest free loans with no repayment schedule from their governments. Qatar and the UAE have created an imbalance in the marketplace that tips heavily in their favor.
While the Gulf airlines have been able to add numerous new route s and destinations, the bi g three American carriers- American Airlines, Delta Air Lines and United Airlines- have been forced to work uphill in order to add route s of their own. As Mayor of Concord , which i s home to a r egiona l airport, I am respectfully asking that you initiate the process of opening consultations with Qatar and the UAE. The practices of the Gulf nations have not only undermined competition a nd distorted the playing field; they are also a violation of Open Skies policy.
Thank you for your consideration. 

# ko/

J. Scott Padgett Mayor
JSP / jhq PC: Senator Richard Burr Senator Thom Tillis Representative Richard Hudson Representative Robert Pittenger Representative Patrick McHenry Representative Alma Adams

Mayor's Office 

# s 10-150422-006 Phone (7 04 ) 920-5215 • Fax (704 ) 92 0-6909#4120

# r-r,~ u-- t lgh Performance Living 111 111111



# s 10-150422-006 P.O. B OX 308 CONCO RD , NC 28026-0308 

### C 1 -J. ,f.\ R.'L

### OTTE


### 17**!~PP .**  

### '15- PJ.-13 L



### The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx S e cretary of Transportation US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Wa s hington, DC 20590 

### ( US POSTAGE 

# $ 00.48 FIRST CLASS Mailed From 28025 04117/2015 031A 0005180627
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>                                                           5 

        
<S>                                                   <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                                            JAN-01-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                                              MAR-31-1997 
<CASH>                                                             18 
<SECURITIES>                                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   18 
<PP&E>                                                         63,705 
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 33,045 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 30,678 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1,677,020 
<BONDS>                                                             0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                                         0 
<COMMON>                                                       14,087
<OTHER-SE>                                                  8,868,506 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   30,678 
<SALES>                                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    0 
<CGS>                                                               0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0 
<CHANGES>                                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                        0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   (0.01) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0 

         

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 8,
2015 (the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2015-2 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the
transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as
in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of
the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 15, 2017
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|No chart available.                                                                               
|No chart available.                                                                               
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|U.S. Refinery Working Storage Capacity of Other Renewable Fuels as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner

v. GREGORY BROWN, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : No. 134 WAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 31st day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.