67348 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices

A. Kuga, Acting Deputy Assistant

Secretary for Import Administration, to

Richard W. Moreland, Acting Assistant

Secretary for Import Administration,

dated concurrently with this notice,

which is hereby adopted by this notice.

A list of the issues which parties have

raised, and to which we have responded

in the Decision Memorandum, is

attached to this notice as an Appendix.

Parties can find a complete discussion

of all issues raised in this review and

the corresponding recommendations in

this public memorandum, which is on

file in the Central Records Unit, room

B–099 (‘‘B–099’’) of the main

Department building. In addition, a

complete version of the Decision

Memorandum can be accessed directly

on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov. The

paper copy and electronic version of the

Decision Memorandum are identical in

content.

Final Results of Review

We determine that the following

percentage weighted-average margin

exists for the period June 1, 1998,

through May 31, 1999:

Manufacturer/exporter Margin

(percent)

Twaron Products .......................... 3.20

The Department shall determine, and

Customs shall assess, antidumping

duties on all appropriate entries. In

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b), we

have calculated an exporter/importerspecific assessment rate by dividing the

total dumping margins for the reviewed

sales by the total entered value of those

reviewed sales. Where the importerspecific assessment rate is above de

minimis, we will instruct Customs to

assess antidumping duties on that

importer’s entries of subject

merchandise.

Cash Deposit Requirements

The following deposit requirements

will be effective upon publication of

this notice of final results of

administrative review for all shipments

of PPD–T aramid from the Netherlands

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,

for consumption on or after the date of

publication, as provided by section

751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit

rate for the reviewed company will be

the rate shown above; (2) for previously

reviewed or investigated companies not

listed above, the cash deposit rate will

continue to be the company-specific rate

published for the most recent period; (3)

if the exporter is not a firm covered in

this review, a prior review, or the

original less-than-fair-value (‘‘LTFV’’)

investigation, but the manufacturer is,

the cash deposit rate will be the rate

established for the most recent period

for the manufacturer of the

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit

rate for all other manufacturers or

exporters will continue to be 66.92

percent. This rate is the ‘‘All Others’’

rate from the LTFV investigation. These

deposit requirements shall remain in

effect until publication of the final

results of the next administrative

review.

This notice also serves as a final

reminder to importers of their

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)

to file a certificate regarding the

reimbursement of antidumping duties

prior to liquidation of the relevant

entries during this review period.

Failure to comply with this requirement

could result in the Secretary’s

presumption that reimbursement of

antidumping duties occurred and the

subsequent assessment of doubled

antidumping duties.

This notice also serves as a reminder

to parties subject to administrative

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their

responsibility concerning the

disposition of proprietary information

disclosed under APO in accordance

with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely

notification of return/destruction of

APO materials or conversion to judicial

protective order is hereby requested.

Failure to comply with the regulations

and the terms of an APO is a

sanctionable violation.

We are issuing and publishing this

determination and notice in accordance

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of

the Act.

Dated: November 3, 2000.

Richard W. Moreland,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

Appendix—Issues in Decision

Memorandum Comments and

Responses

1. Constructed Export Price

A. Consolidated Financial Statements Used

to Calculate Financial Expenses (U.S.

Indirect Selling Expenses)

B. Credit Period for Imputed Credit Expenses

Related to Consignment Sales

C. Duties Related to Duty Drawback

(Movement Expenses—Canadian Duties)

2. Cost of Production

A. Consolidated Financial Statements Used

to Calculate Net Interest Expense

B. Treatment of Goodwill Expenses

[FR Doc. 00–28834 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–583–816]

Notice of Postponement of Final

Results of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review: Certain

Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings

From Taiwan

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of postponement of final

results of antidumping duty

administrative review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 9, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex

Villanueva or James Doyle, Office IX,

DAS Group III, Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th

Street and Constitution Avenue NW,

Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202)

482–6412 and (202) 482–0159,

respectively.

Postponement of Preliminary

Determination

The Department of Commerce (‘‘the

Department’’) is postponing the final

results in the antidumping duty

administrative review of Certain

Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings

(‘‘SSBWPF’’) from Taiwan. The deadline

for issuing the final results in this

administrative review is now December

15, 2000.

On July 29, 1999, the Department

initiated this administrative review. See

Initiation of Antidumping and

Countervailing Duty Administrative

Reviews and Requests for Revocation in

Part, 64 FR 41075 (July 29, 1999). The

date for issuing the final results of the

review was November 3, 2000. In order

to provide interested parties an

opportunity to comment on the issue of

reimbursement, which arose late in the

proceeding, we are extending the time

limit for the final results of the

administrative review of SSBWPF from

Taiwan by 42 days, in accordance with

section 751(a)(3) of the Tariff Act of

1930, as amended. See November 3,

2000 memorandum from Edward Yang

to Joseph Spetrini: Extension of Time

Limit for the Administrative Review of

Certain Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe

Fittings from Taiwan.

The date for issuing the final results

is moved from November 3, 2000 to

December 15, 2000.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices 67349

Dated: November 3, 2000.

Edward C. Yang,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, AD/CVD

Enforcement Group III.

[FR Doc. 00–28833 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Submission for OMB Review;

Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

The Department of Defense has

submitted to OMB for clearance, the

following proposal for collection of

information under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

Chapter 35).

Title, Form, and OMB Number: Health

Professions Accessions Forms; AETC

Forms 1402, 1437; OMB Number 0701–

0078.

Type of Request: Extension.

Number of Respondents: 3,600.

Responses per Respondent: 1.

Annual Responses: 3,600.

Average Burden per Response: 1 hour.

Annual Burden Hours: 3,600.

Needs and Uses: Respondents are

civilian candidates applying for a

commission in the U.S. Air Force as

health care officers. These forms

provide pertinent information to

facilitate selection of candidates for a

commission.

Affected Public: Individuals or

households.

Frequency: On occasion.

Respondent’s Obligation: Required to

Obtain or Retain Benefits.

OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C.

Springer.

Written comments and

recommendations on the proposed

information collection should be sent to

Mr. Springer at the Officer of

Management and Budget, Desk Officer

for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive

Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert

Cushing.

Written requests for copies of the

information collection proposal should

be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR,

1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite

1204, Arlington, VA 22202–4302.

Dated: November 3, 2000.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00–28721 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Board of Visitors Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense

Acquisition University.

ACTION: Board of visitors meeting.

SUMMARY: The next meeting of the

Defense Acquisition University (DAU)

Board of Visitors (BoV) will be held at

the Packard Conference Center, Building

184, Ft. Belvoir, Virginia on Wednesday

December 6, 2000 from 0900 until 1500.

The purpose of this meeting is to report

back to the BoV on continuing items of

interest.

The meeting is open to the public;

however, because of space limitations,

allocation of seating will be made on a

first-come, first served basis. Persons

desiring to attend the meeting should

call Mr. John Michel at 703.805.4575.

Dated: November 3, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Liaison Officer,

Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00–28719 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense

Department of Defense Wage

Committee; Notice of Closed Meetings

Pursuant to the provisions of section

10 of Public Law 92–463, the Federal

Advisory Committee Act, notice is

hereby given that closed meetings of the

Department of Defense Wage Committee

will be held on December 5, 2000;

December 12, 2000; December 19, 2000;

and December 26, 2000, at 10:00 a.m. in

Room A105, The Nash Building, 1400

Key Boulevard, Rosslyn, Virginia.

Under the provisions of section 10(d)

of Public Law 92–463, the Department

of Defense has determined that the

meetings meet the criteria to close

meetings to the public because the

matters to be considered are related to

internal rules and practices of the

Department of Defense and the detailed

wage data to be considered were

obtained from officials of private

establishments with a guarantee that the

data will be held in confidence.

However, members of the public who

may wish to do so are invited to submit

material in writing to the chairman

concerning matters believed to be

deserving of the Committee’s attention.

Additional information concerning

the meetings may be obtained by writing

to the Chairman, Department of Defense

Wage Committee, 4000 Defense

Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–4000.

Dated: November 3, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00–28720 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Final Environmental Assessment (EA)

and Finding of No Significant Impact

(FNSI) for BRAC 95 Disposal and

Reuse of Rio Vista Army Reserve

Center, California

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

SUMMARY: In accordance with Public

Law 101–510 (as amended), the Defense

Base Closure and Realignment Act of

1990, the Defense Base Closure and

Realignment Commission recommended

the closure of Rio Vista Reserve Center.

The Final EA evaluates the

environmental impacts of the disposal

and subsequent reuse of the 28-acre

installation. Alternatives examined in

this EA include no action,

unencumbered disposal of the property

and encumbered disposal of the

property. Encumbered disposal refers to

transfer or conveyance of property

having restrictions on subsequent use as

a result of any Army-imposed or legal

restraint. Under the no action

alternative, the Army would not dispose

of property but would maintain it in a

caretaker status for an indefinite period.

DATES: Comments must be submitted by

December 11, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the Final EA and

FNSI may be obtained by writing to Mr.

Jerry Fuentes, Corps of Engineers,

Sacramento District, Environmental

Resources Branch (CESPK–PD–R), 1325

J Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

Jerry Fuentes at (916) 557–6706.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: While

closure of Rio Vista is the Army’s

primary action, the EA also analyzes the

potential environmental effects of reuse

as a secondary impact by means of

evaluating intensity-based reuse

scenarios. The Army’s preferred

alternative for disposal of the Rio Vista

Reserve Center is encumbered disposal,

with encumbrances pertaining to

easements, threatened and endangered

species habitat, lead-based paint and

asbestos-containing material.

A Notice of Intent declaring the

Army’s intent to prepare an EA for the