alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit










AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Amendment to Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into as of the 2nd day of September, 2015 as an amendment to the original Employment Agreement dated September 10, 2014 between Sam J Messina III ("Employee") and Minerco Resources, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, it’s affiliates, predecessors and subsidiaries (the "Company”). 
WHEREAS, Employee and the Company desire to enter into this Amendment Agreement setting forth the terms and conditions for the employment relationship of Employee with the Company during the Employment Term (as defined below).  This agreement shall amend the Employment Agreement dated September 10, 2014 between Employee and Company.  
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties to this Amendment Agreement hereby agree to Amend the sections as follows: 
2.2     Stock. The Company shall grant to Five Hundred Thousand (500,000) shares of its Class B Preferred Stock, which were subsequently exchanged on January 7, 2015 for Two Hundred Fifty Thousand (250,000) shares of its Class C Preferred Stock, upon the effective date of this original Employment Agreement dated September 10, 2014.  The stock shall be fully paid, non-assessable and shall contain other customary rights and privileges, including piggy back registration rights.  All stock shall vest as of July 31, 2017.  
6.5.     Termination in Case of Death. In case of Employee's death, any and all unvested stock or options granted to Employee under Section 2.2 of this Agreement shall vest in favor of Employee's estate as provided for in this Section(s) 6.51, 6.5.2, 6.5.3, and 6.5.4 herein. Company shall also continue any health benefits for family for one year.  All stock shall vest as of July 31, 2017.  




The Company:
Minerco Resources, Inc.
800 Bering Drive, Suite 201
Houston, TX 77057


Employee: 
Sam J Messina III
7620 Miramar Road, Suite 4200
San Diego, CA 92126


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment Agreement as of the date first above written. 
Minerco Resources, Inc., a Nevada Corporation


By:___/s/ V. Scott Vanis____________
     V. Scott Vanis, President, Director 











Employee




By:___/s/ Sam J Messina III____________
     Sam J Messina III, an Individual
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC UIT November

5, 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK PU BLI SH I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 14956

________________________ D . C . D o c k e tN o . 0 7 - 0 0 2 9 5 - C V - ME F - WC D A N I E L L E E S I E B E R T , P la in tif f - A p p e lla n t, v ersu s R I C H A R D A L L E N , C o m m is s io n e r , A lab a m aD e p a rtm e n t o f C o rr e c tio n s , in d iv id u a llya n din h is o f f ic ia l c ap a c ity , G R A N T T C U L L I V E R , W a r de n, H ol m a n C o rrect i o n al F aci l i ty, i n h i s in d iv id u a l a n do f

f ic ia l c ap a c ity , D e f e n d a n ts - A p p e lle e s .

________________________ O n A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e M i d d l e D i s tr i c to f A l ab a ma

_________________________ ( N ove m be r5, 2007) ON P E T I T I ON F OR RE HE AR I NG E N B AN C Be f o r e TJ OFLAT, AN DERS ON , BI RC H, DU BI NA , BL ACK, BARKET T, HU LL ,Chief Judg e Edmondson has not par ticipated in this order. Judge s Ed Carnes a nd * Wil liam H. Pryor Jr. have re cused themselves and have not par ticipated. M A R C U S , an dW IL S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. * B Y T H E C O U R T : T he or de rgr a nt i ng e n ba nc r e he a r i ng i n thi s appe a l , ___ F . 3d ___, 2007 W L 3 1 0 4 9 4 1 , d at ed 2 5 O ct o b er 2 0 0 7 i s VA C A TED , a n dth e c a s e is R EM A N D ED to the pa ne l f

orc ons i de r a t i on of

the i s s ue s r a i s e d byS t a t e of A l aba m ai n i t s P e t i t i on f o rR e h e a r in g E n B a n c .

2
Record of Discussion D ocket No . FAA- Dire cto rate Identifier: -AD



### With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e ., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA , AOPA, ALPA , GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED A4A Bob Ireland 7/ 26/ 2015 No Comment Boeing Barry Bannister 7 / 26/2015 No Comment

Other/Additional I nformati on :
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code),  the  undersigned  officer of
Digital  Lifestyles Group, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect
to the  Quarterly  Report  of the  Company  on Form  10-Q for the  period  ended
September 30, 2005 (the "Report") that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   August 10, 2006                   By:      /s/ Andy Teng
                                                    ----------------------------
                                           Name:    Andy Teng
                                           Title:   Chief Executive Officer,
                                                    Chief Financial Officer and
                                                    Chairman of the Board




     The foregoing  certification  is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the  United  States  Code) and is not being  filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WALKER WINGSAIL AMERICA, INC. AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000942652
<NAME> WALKER WINGSAIL AMERICA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              33
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          2
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    35
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              284
<BONDS>                                            556
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                          61
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       903
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (314)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (314)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (314)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00074-Z-BR

§

JEFFRY MONTOYA §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

JEFFRY MONTOYA, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), has 

appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Information. After 

cautioning and examining JEFFRY MONTOYA under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I 

determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that JEFFRY MONTOYA be adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 1708 - POSSESSION OF STOLEN 

MAIL MATTER and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☐ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☒ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☒ The Government does not oppose release.

☒ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☒ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: August 10, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00074-Z-BR Document 20 Filed 08/10/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 35
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 216

Designating January 16, 1994, as ‘‘Religious Freedom Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 16, 1993

Mr. BLILEY (for himself, Mr. BATEMAN, Mr. BOUCHER, Ms. BYRNE, Mr.

GOODLATTE, Mr. MORAN, Mr. PAYNE of Virginia, Mr. PICKETT, Mr.

SCOTT, Mr. SISISKY, Mr. WOLF, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. COBLE, Mrs.

COLLINS of Illinois, Mr. DARDEN, Mr. EMERSON, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA,

Mr. FISH, Mr. FROST, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. GEKAS, Mr. GILLMOR, Mr.

GINGRICH, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. HAMILTON, Mr. HANSEN, Mr. HUGHES,

Mr. HUNTER, Mr. HYDE, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. KASICH,

Mr. KREIDLER, Mr. LLOYD, Mr. MCCLOSKEY, Mr. MCDADE, Mrs. MEYERS of Kansas, Mr. MONTGOMERY, Mr. MOORHEAD, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. PETERSON of Florida, Mr. PORTER, Mr. QUILLEN, Mr. ROGERS, Mr. ROTH,

Mr. SARPALIUS, Mr. SLATTERY, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. SMITH

of Texas, Mr. SUNDQUIST, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. WALSH, and Mr. WASHINGTON) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating January 16, 1994, as ‘‘Religious Freedom Day’’.

Whereas December 15, 1991, is the 200th anniversary of the

completion of the ratification of the Bill of Rights;
2

•HJ 216 IH

Whereas the first amendment to the Constitution of the

United States guarantees religious liberty to the people

of the United States;

Whereas millions of people from all parts of the world have

come to the United States fleeing religious persecution

and seeking freedom to worship;

Whereas in 1777 Thomas Jefferson wrote the bill entitled ‘‘A

Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom in Virginia’’ to

guarantee freedom of conscience and separation of

church and state;

Whereas in 1786, through the devotion of Virginians such as

George Mason and James Madison, the General Assembly of Virginia passed such bill;

Whereas the Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom inspired and shaped the guarantees of religious freedom in

the first amendment;

Whereas the Supreme Court of the United States has recognized repeatedly that the Statute of Virginia for Religious

Freedom was an important influence in the development

of the Bill of Rights;

Whereas scholars across the United States have proclaimed

the vital importance of such statute and leaders in fields

such as law and religion have devoted time, energy, and

resources to celebrating its contribution to international

freedom; and

Whereas America’s First Freedom Center, located in Richmond, Virginia, plans a permanent monument to the

Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom, accompanied

by educational programs and commemorative activities

for visitors from around the world: Now, therefore, be it
3

•HJ 216 IH

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That January 16, 1994, is designated as ‘‘Religious Free4 dom Day’’, and the President is authorized and requested

5 to issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United

6 States to join together to celebrate their religious freedom

7 and to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and

8 activities.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

      ( print page 69345)    

# TIME AND DATE:

2 p.m., Monday, November 20, 2000.

# PLACE:

Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, 1325 G Street, NW., Suite 800, Board Room, Washington, DC 20005.

# STATUS:

Open/Closed.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jeffrey T. Bryson, General Counsel/Secretary (202) 220-2372.

# AGENDA:

 

I. Call to Order

II. Approval of Minutes: August 23, Regular Meeting

III. Treasurer's Report:

IV. Executive Director's Quarterly Management Report

V. Personnel Committee Report (CLOSED) November 7, 2000 Meeting

VI. Adjourn

Jeffrey T. Bryson,

General Counsel/Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-29465  Filed 11-14-00; 11:21 am]

BILLING CODE 7570-01-M
7. Potential Emerging Thr
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-178-Y 

 § 

GREGORY DESHAWN BAKER (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED July 29, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00178-Y Document 25 Filed 07/29/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 50
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SANANGELO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

P1aintiff,

NO. 6:22-CR-017-01-H

JESSICA MONIQI.IE RAMIREZ,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE TINITED STATES MAGISTRATE JI]DGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United states Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(bxl), the undersigned District Judge is ofthe opinion rhat rhe Reporr and

Recommendation of the Magisfiate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be irnposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

Dated Seotemb er / /n - 2022

JAMES HENDRIX

UNITED//4T ATE S D rSTRr CT ruDG E

/

Case 6:22-cr-00017-H-BU Document 25 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 50
#### Louis TILLMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 25968.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 28, 1952.

Appellant, pro se.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The conviction is for driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated, with the punishment assessed at $100 fine.

Appellant has filed his affidavit requesting that the appeal be dismissed. The request is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
{"agency":"Treasury","generated":"2014-10-02 14:33:27","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"}],"value":"2014"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"6"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["BEP","BPD","DO","FinCEN","FMS","IRS","MINT","OCC","TIGTA","TTB"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["21"," ","190","79","76","3288","29","432","73","13"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["20"," ","228","76","88","3132","31","515","85","16"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["9"," ","267"," ","2","317"," ","4"," "," "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2014","quarter":"Q4"}
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 222 (Thursday, November 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29387]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Gold/Boulder/Sullivan, Kootenai National Forest, Lincoln County, 
Montana

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of revision of intent to prepare an environmental impact 
statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The USDA--Forest Service is revising its notice of intent to 
prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Gold/Boulder/Sullivan 
Project, as described in the Federal Register dated March 24, 2000 
(Vol. 65, No. 58, Pages 15892-15895), due to the following major 
changes:
    1. The filing of the DEIS will be delayed more than six months, and
    2. There will be changes to the Proposed Action
    The delay and changes are attributable to wildfires that occurred 
in the Gold/Boulder/Sullivan Project Area during August 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact Ron Komac, Acting NEPA Coordinator, 
Rexford Ranger District, Phone (406) 296-7130.

    Dated: November 7, 2000.
Bob Castaneda,
Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest.
[FR Doc. 00-29387 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### Arch SPAW, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 19, 1951.

Robert D. Jones, Somerset, 'for movant.

A. E. Funk, Atty. Gen., Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen.; opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied.

Judgment affirmed.