alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1



ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE



This Compliance Certificate
is furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of April 22,
2015, by and among Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2015-B, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”),
Hyundai ABS Funding, LLC (formerly known as Hyundai ABS Funding Corporation), as depositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee
and Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersigned hereby certifies that:



1)      I am a duly authorized officer of the
Servicer.



2)      A review of the activities of the Servicer
from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Relevant Period”) and of the Servicer’s performance under
the Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.



3)      Based on such review, the Servicer has,
to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant
Period.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed this
Compliance Certificate this 16th day of March, 2017.



| | HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA, as Servicer
| | ------------------------------------
| |                                     
| | By:                                 
| |                                     
| |
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION 

FOR REINSTATEMENT OF ISAAC 

H. MARKS TO THE BAR OF 

MARYLAND

*

*

*

*

*

*

 IN THE

 SUPREME COURT

 OF MARYLAND

 Misc. Docket AG No. 30

 September Term, 2022 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Isaac H. Marks’ Petition for Reinstatement and Bar 

Counsel’s consent to the petition for reinstatement, it is this 16th day of December 2022, 

by the Supreme Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that the Petition is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that Isaac H. Marks is reinstated as a member of the Bar of Maryland; 

and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name Isaac H. Marks upon 

the register of attorneys entitled to practice law in this State and certify that fact to the 

Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State. 

 

 /s/ Matthew J. Fader

 Chief Justice
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

November 5, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

PUBLISH

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-14956

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00295-CV-MEF-WC

DANIEL LEE SIEBERT, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus 

RICHARD ALLEN, Commissioner, 

Alabama Department of Corrections, 

individually and in his official capacity, 

GRANTT CULLIVER, Warden, Holman 

Correctional Facility, in his 

individual and official capacity, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Alabama

_________________________

(November 5, 2007)

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, BARKETT, HULL,
Chief Judge Edmondson has not participated in this order. Judges Ed Carnes and *

William H. Pryor Jr. have recused themselves and have not participated.

MARCUS, and WILSON, Circuit Judges.*

B Y T H E C O U R T :

The order granting en banc rehearing in this appeal, ___ F.3d ___, 2007 WL

3104941, dated 25 October 2007 is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to

the panel for consideration of the issues raised by State of Alabama in its Petition

for Rehearing En Banc. 

2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL A. DAVIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee

.

No. 4D202 2

- 3164

[ July 18, 2024 ]

Appeal from the C ircuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit

, Broward County ; John J. Murphy

, III, Judge; L.T. Case No.

15 015878CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer , Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear

, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS

, F ORST and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
{"agency":"Treasury","generated":"2014-09-03 10:41:11","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"}],"value":"2014"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["BEP","BPD","DO","FinCEN","FMS","IRS","MINT","OCC","TIGTA","TTB"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["21"," ","178","56","71","2289","26","387","59","3"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["19"," ","344","55","87","2195","34","397","68","4"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["1"," ","290"," "," 3","359"," ","12","14","1"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2014","quarter":"Q1"}
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

VENUSTIANO CARDOSO, §

#57189-177, '

Movant, '

' CIVIL NO. 3:22-CV-765-K

v. ' (CRIMINAL NO. 3:18-CR-232-K-4)

'

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

Respondent. '

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Considering the record in this case and pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 22(b), Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings for the United 

States District Courts, and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the Court DENIES a Certificate of 

Appealability. Based on the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court finds 

that the movant has failed to show (1) that reasonable jurists would find this Court’s 

“assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” or (2) that reasonable 

jurists would find it “debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial 

of a constitutional right” and “debatable whether [this Court] was correct in its 

procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States 

District Courts, as amended effective on December 1, 2019, reads as follows:

(a) Certificate of Appealability. The district court must issue or deny a 

certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the 

applicant. Before entering the final order, the court may direct the 

parties to submit arguments on whether a certificate should issue. If 

the court issues a certificate, the court must state the specific issue or 

Case 3:22-cv-00765-K Document 7 Filed 04/13/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 35
issues that satisfy the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(2). If 

the court denies a certificate, a party may not appeal the denial but 

may seek a certificate from the court of appeals under Federal Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 22. A motion to reconsider a denial does not 

extend the time to appeal.

(b)Time to Appeal. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) governs 

the time to appeal an order entered under these rules. A timely notice 

of appeal must be filed even if the district court issues a certificate of 

appealability. These rules do not extend the time to appeal the 

original judgment of conviction.

In the event the movant will file a notice of appeal, the Court notes that he will 

need to pay the applicable filing fee of $505.00 or move for leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis on appeal.

SO ORDERED.

Signed April 13th, 2022.

 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00765-K Document 7 Filed 04/13/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 36
# Official Journal C 165/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 165 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5128 June 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 165

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5128 June 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 165/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2008/C 165/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 165/02 | Euro exchange rates | 4 |
| 2008/C 165/03 | New national face of euro coins intended for circulation | 5 |
| 2008/C 165/04 | New national side of euro coins intended for circulation | 6 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2008/C 165/02

Euro exchange rates

4

2008/C 165/03

New national face of euro coins intended for circulation

5

2008/C 165/04

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

6

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2008/C 165/05 | Call for proposals IX-2009/01 — Grants to political parties at European level | 7 |
| 2008/C 165/06 | Call for proposals IX-2009/02 — Grants to political foundations at European level | 10 |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 165/07 | Call for proposals for the ESPON 2013 Operational Programme | 13 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 165/08 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5153 — Arsenal/DSP) (1) | 14 |
| 2008/C 165/09 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5226 — CINVEN/PGHL) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 15 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2008/C 165/05

Call for proposals IX-2009/01 — Grants to political parties at European level

7

2008/C 165/06

Call for proposals IX-2009/02 — Grants to political foundations at European level

10

Commission

2008/C 165/07

Call for proposals for the ESPON 2013 Operational Programme

13

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

Commission

2008/C 165/08

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5153 — Arsenal/DSP) (1)

14

2008/C 165/09

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5226 — CINVEN/PGHL) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

15

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2022319EN.01000301.xml

| 23.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10795 – TA ASSOCIATES / VISTA / iCIMS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 319/03)

On 12 August 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10795. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10795. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 32.2

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 906**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terry L. Stevens, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the Operating Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ TERRYL.STEVENS                                                                       |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Terry L. StevensSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner |   |
| November 14, 2007                                                              |   |
# C_2011355EN.01001902.xml

| 3.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/19

---

Order of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro v Commission

(Case T-353/10) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Debit note - Objection of inadmissibility - Contractual nature of the dispute - Nature of the action - Act open to challenge)

2011/C 355/34

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro (Athens, Greece) (represented by: E. Tzannini, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Sauka, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of a debit note issued by the Commission on 22 July 2010 for recovery of the sum of EUR 109 415,20 paid to the applicant in the context of financial assistance in support of a medical research project

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro AE. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro AE.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.

1

---
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 304

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (S. 1312)

3 to amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act

4 of 1974 in order to provide for the availability of remedies

5 for certain former pension plan participants and bene6 ficiaries, the Secretary of the Senate shall make the follow7 ing corrections:

8 (1) In section 1, strike ‘‘1993’’ and insert

9 ‘‘1994’’.

10 (2) In section 2(1), strike ‘‘paragraph (5)’’ and

11 insert ‘‘paragraph (7)’’.

12 (3) In section 2(2), strike ‘‘paragraph (6)’’ and

13 insert ‘‘paragraph (8)’’.

14 (4) In section 2(3), in the new paragraph (7)

15 to be added thereby, strike ‘‘(7)’’ and insert ‘‘(9)’’.
2

•HCON 304 EH

1 (5) In section 3, strike ‘‘subsection (a)(7)’’ and

2 insert ‘‘subsection (a)(9)’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 3,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 304

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make

corrections in the enrollment of the bill S. 1312.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29265]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Applicant

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicant has filed with 
the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as Non-
Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.
    Ocean Freight Forwarders--Ocean Transportation Intermediary 
Applicants:

TAT International, Inc., 41-79 Main Street, Flushing, NY 11355.
Officers: Audie Wang, Treasurer/Secretary, (Qualifying Individual), 
Timothy C. O'Nell, President.

    Dated: November 9, 2000.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29265 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### CULBERTSON v. STATE.

No. 25019.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 6, 1950.

None on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for giving a check for $108.45 to Harry Holland, in *877Amarillo, such check being' drawn on a bank at White Deer, Texas, in exchange for certain articles of clothing. His punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for two- years.

It was shown that appellant had insufficient funds in said bank to pay such check at such time.

The defense to such action consisted of a plea of insanity, which was presented by certain witnesses, and the State countered with further witnesses. This matter was submitted to the jury by the trial court under unobjected to- instructions, and they found appellant sane at such times.

There is nothing further presented to us, and the judgment will therefore be affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-4557-N-46]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

November 17, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Clifford Taffet, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration*, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: November 9, 2000.

Fred Karnas, Jr.,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs, Assistance Programs.

[FR Doc. 00-29300  Filed 11-16-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

EUGENIO VARGAS,

 Plaintiff, 

§

§

§

§

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00430-O

§

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL 

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, et al.,

 Defendants. 

§

§

§

ORDER

Plaintiff filed this case in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

on May 17, 2022. Weeks prior, another plaintiff filed a similar suit in the same court against the 

same defendant, Association of Professional Flight Attendants. See 4:22-cv-00343-Y. The same

counsel is involved in both suits. In the interest of efficiency, the Court TRANSFERS this action 

to Judge Means of the Fort Worth Division of the Northern District of Texas. 

SO ORDERED on this 6th day of July, 2022. 

Case 4:22-cv-00430-Y Document 20 Filed 07/06/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 193