alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                 ------------





               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Integrated Data Corp (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David C. Bryan, President and acting Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of Integrated Data Corp.


Date:  November 2, 2007        By:  /s/ David C. Bryan
                                    ------------------
                                    David C. Bryan
                                    President and acting
                                    Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Integrated Data Corp. and
will be retained by Integrated Data Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Partially Unopposed Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery Page 1

(30028/757889/sdh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

BRYAN RISER, §

Plaintiff, §

§

vs. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-01014-C

§

§

ESTEBAN MONTENEGRO, §

Defendant. §

DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S PARTIALLY UNOPPOSED

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY

NOW COMES Defendant Esteban Montenegro (hereinafter “Defendant” or 

“Montenegro”), Defendant in the above-referenced cause, and files his Response to Plaintiff’s 

Partially Unopposed Motion or Leave to Conduct Discovery (Dkt. #41), and would respectfully 

show as follows:

I.

Defendant no longer opposes Plaintiff’s request to depose A. Lopez, Brent Mauldin, Saul 

Sarmiento, or Jason Fine/representative of the Dallas D.A.’s Office. Defendant does reserve the 

right, however, to object to the examination of these witnesses to the extent Plaintiff’s 

examination exceeds the scope of issues relevant to Defendant’s qualified immunity defense, as 

asserted in his pending motion for summary judgment. 

Additionally, Plaintiff Bryan Riser has subpoenaed Defendant Montenegro to testify 

under oath at a civil service hearing contesting Plaintiff’s termination from the City of Dallas 

Police Department on January 11, 2024. Plaintiff’s lawyer in that matter has specifically advised 

counsel for Defendant that he intends to attempt to discredit Defendant’s investigation of 

Plaintiff and the probable cause affidavit that served as the basis for Plaintiff’s arrest, the very 

Case 3:22-cv-01014-K Document 42 Filed 12/22/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 274
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Partially Unopposed Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery Page 2

(30028/757889/sdh)

subjects that are at issue in this suit. Depending upon the scope and results of that examination 

and testimony, Defendant may have additional objections to the necessary scope of his 

deposition in this case, and may object that the deposition is no longer necessary at all.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant asks the Court for such and 

relief, both general and special, at law or in equity, to which he may show himself to be justly 

entitled.

 Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ Thomas P. Brandt

THOMAS P. BRANDT

State Bar No. 02883500

tbrandt@fhmbk.com

STEPHEN D. HENNINGER

State Bar No. 00784256

shenninger@fhmbk.com

CHRISTOPHER BRANDT

State Bar No. 24072262

cbrandt@fhmbk.com

FANNING, HARPER, MARTINSON,

BRANDT & KUTCHIN, P.C.

One Glen Lakes

8140 Walnut Hill Lane, Ste. 200

Dallas, Texas 75231

(214) 369-1300 (office)

(214) 987-9649 (telecopier)

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 22, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court through the ECF system and an email notice of the electronic filing 

was sent to all attorneys of record.

/s/ Thomas P. Brandt

THOMAS P. BRANDT

Case 3:22-cv-01014-K Document 42 Filed 12/22/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 275
#### SCHWARTZ v. STATE.

No. 21476.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 5, 1941.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for failing to stop and render aid to a person struck by an automobile driven by appellant. The penalty assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of five months.

The indictment appears to be in regular form. The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged and waived a jury upon the trial.

No error having been presented by the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 40 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 40

   Expressing the sense of Congress in opposition to the efforts of 
certain groups to impose a sexual agenda on the children of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 17, 1993

  Mr. DeLay submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress in opposition to the efforts of 
certain groups to impose a sexual agenda on the children of the United 
                                States.

Whereas certain groups, including the Adolescent Pregnancy and Parenthood 
        Advisory Council of Texas (referred to in this resolution as ``APPAC'') 
        advocate the enactment of legislation to provide for the distribution in 
        public school systems of contraceptives and off-campus reproductive 
        health care, including abortion, without parental knowledge or consent;
Whereas the Sex Information and Education Council of the United States (referred 
        to in this resolution as ``SIECUS'') advocates the compulsory teaching, 
        in progressive stages from grades K-12, that homosexuality is equal to 
        heterosexuality, that homosexual and lesbian marriages offer all the 
        advantages of traditional families, and that ``. . . . legal abortion is 
        very safe'' and acceptable;
Whereas both APPAC and SIECUS advocate not only compulsory public school 
        instruction, using both visual and graphic techniques, of conventional 
        and deviant sexuality but also a ``Teen Bill of Rights'' that would 
        remove parental consent and religious considerations as factors in 
        teenage sexual activity and abortion;
Whereas abundant medical, pedagogical, and psychological evidence contradicts 
        and accordingly renders suspect the claims of APPAC and SIECUS; and
Whereas the legislative agenda advocated by APPAC and SIECUS represents an 
        unacceptable departure from the prevailing ethical values of the Nation: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that it opposes the proposals of 
the Adolescent Pregnancy and Parenthood Advisory Council of Texas and 
the Sex Information and Education Council of the United States.

                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal L 275/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 275 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6431 July 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 275

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6431 July 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2021/1240 of 13 July 2021 on the compliance of the EU portal and the EU database for clinical trials of medicinal products for human use with the requirements referred to in Article 82(2) of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2021/1240 of 13 July 2021 on the compliance of the EU portal and the EU database for clinical trials of medicinal products for human use with the requirements referred to in Article 82(2) of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal L 347/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 347 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5123 December 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 347

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5123 December 2008

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1285/2008 of 15 December 2008 on the introduction into the Community of personal consignments of products of animal origin and amending Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1285/2008 of 15 December 2008 on the introduction into the Community of personal consignments of products of animal origin and amending Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 (1)

1

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Note to the reader(see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

*

Note to the reader(see page 3 of the cover)

Note to the reader

s3

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 114

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States

guaranteeing access to medical care to all citizens of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 17, 1993

Mr. STARK introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States guaranteeing access to medical care to all citizens

of the United States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

HJ 114 IH

1 States within seven years from the date of its submission

2 by the Congress:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The right of citizens of the United

5 States to medical care shall be guaranteed.

6 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have the power to

7 enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this

8 article.

9 ‘‘SECTION 3. This amendment shall take effect one

10 year after the date of ratification.’’.

Æ
#### MARRERO et ux. v. AMERICAN GENERAL INS. CO., Inc.

No. A-4091.

Supreme Court of Texas.

May 6, 1953.

*955J. Hubert Lee, Austin, for petitioners.

Hart, Brown & Sparks, ■ Austin, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Writ of error is refused, no reversible error, for the reason that -no final judgment was entered in the trial court. We do not pass upon any other point.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 96

Concerning the removal of Russian troops from the independent Baltic States

of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 6, 1993

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr.

MARKEY, Mr. SARPALIUS, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. POSHARD, Mr. VISCLOSKY,

Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. APPLEGATE, and Mr.

CARDIN) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning the removal of Russian troops from the

independent Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

Whereas the armed forces of the former Soviet Union, currently under control of the Russian Federation, continue

to be deployed on the territory of the sovereign and independent Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania

against the wishes of the Baltic peoples and their governments;

Whereas the stationing of military forces on the territory of

another sovereign state against the will of that state is

contrary to international law;
2

•HCON 96 IH

Whereas the presence of Russian military forces in the Baltic

States may present a destabilizing effect on the governments of these states;

Whereas the governments of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania

have demanded that the Russian Federation remove such

forces from their territories;

Whereas Article 15 of the July 1992 Helsinki Summit Declaration of the Conference on Security and Cooperation

in Europe specifically calls for the conclusion, without

delay, of appropriate bilateral agreements, including

timetables, for the ‘‘early, orderly and complete withdrawal of such foreign troops from the territories of the

Baltic states’’;

Whereas the United States is aware of the difficulties facing

the Russian Federation in resettling Russian soldiers and

their families in Russia, and that the lack of housing is

a factor in the expeditious removal of Russian troops;

Whereas the United States is committed to providing assistance to the Russian Federation for construction of housing and job retraining for returning troops in an attempt

to help alleviate this burden; and

Whereas the United States is encouraged by the progress

achieved thus far in removal of such troops, and welcomes the agreement reached between the Russian Federation and Lithuania establishing the August 1993

deadline for troop removal: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress calls upon the Government

3 of the Russian Federation to continue to remove its troops

4 from the independent Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia,
3

•HCON 96 IH

1 and Lithuania through a firm, expeditious, and conscien2 tiously observed schedule.

Æ
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

D&J Machinery, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62019

)

Under Contract No. W912EP

- 15

- C

- 0022 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Karl Dix, Jr., Esq.

Jeanne M. Harrison, Esq.

Lochlin B. Samples, Esq.

Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP

Atlanta

, GA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Bruce E. Groover, Esq.

Susan E. Symanski, Esq.

Kristin M. Bigham, Esq.

James M Zaleski, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys

U.S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: August 16, 2023

OWEN C. WILSON

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals2 I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62019

, Appeal of D&J Machinery,

Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: August 17, 2023

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FILIBERTO ORTIZ-SANCHEZ (OI)

CASE NO.: 3:22-CRREPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

FILIBERTO ORTIZ-SAI\CHBZ, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d26l (5th Cir.

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. ll, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count(s) One of the

Indictment. After cautioning and examining FILIBERTO ORTIZ-SANCHEZ under oath concerning each of the subjects

mentioned in Rule l l, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense(s) charged is

supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend

that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that FILIBERTO ORTIZ-SANCHEZ be adjudged guilty of Illegal Reentry After

Removal from the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. $ 1326(a) and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being

foun/Cuiltl of the offense(s) by the district judge,

V The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

n The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 3la3(aXl) unless the Court finds by clear and

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community

if released.

The Government does not oppose release.

The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under $ 3142(b) or (c).

The Government opposes release.

The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the

Government.

The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to l8 U.S.C. $ 3la3(a)(2) unless (l)(a) the Court finds there is a

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Govemment has

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown

under $ 3 la5(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: 16ft day of August,2022.

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service

shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District

Judge. 28 U.S.C. $636(bXlXB).

$

$

$

$

$

tr

!

!

!

D

n

fl

ss-Xg,

AUG 1 6 2022

ITED STATES MA

Case 3:22-cr-00155-X Document 24 Filed 08/16/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 31
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

BARBARA BETTS,

Plaintiff,

v.

KROGER TEXAS, L.P.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00645-O 

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Agreed Motion to Transfer Venue (ECF No. 4), filed July 29, 

2022. The parties request that the Court transfer the case to the Dallas Division because a 

substantial part of the events occurred in Johnson County. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a), 1391(b)(2). 

The Court GRANTS the motion and TRANSFERS the case to the Dallas Division of the Northern 

District of Texas.

SO ORDERED this 29th day of July, 2022.

Case 4:22-cv-00645-O Document 5 Filed 07/29/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 39
#### LANCE v. CITY OF MISSION et al.

Mo. No. 17371.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

May 27, 1953.

Ewers, Cox & Toothaker, McAllen, for appellant.

Hill, Lochridge, King & Hodson, Mission, Cox, Patterson & Freeland, McAllen, Sid L. Hardin, Edinburg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has-filed herein a motion for extension of time within'which to file the.record. This motion will be denied for the reason that neither the transcript nor the statement of facts was filed with the Clerk of this Court within the time prescribed by Rule 385, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

The order sought -to be appealed from was rendered on March 14, 1953. ■ The transcript was not tendered,.for filing until May 13, 1953, long after the twenty-day period and the five-day period for filing of motions for extension of time had expired.

Appellant contends that this appeal is governed by Rule 386, because the district judge, in his order overruling his request for temporary -injunction, stated as a reason for his action, that a “plea in bar” *959presented by one of the defendants should be sustained.

The judgment rendered determines whether the same is interlocutory or final in character and not the judge’s reasons for rendering the same. There is no ambiguity as to the order entered here. It was rendered after hearing upon a “show cause order” rather than a citation. It does not purport to finally dispose of the cause, but, on the contrary, provides that, “It is accordingly further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the application of plaintiff for a writ of temporary injunction pendente lite should be, and it is hereby, in all tilings denied.”

Motion overruled.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 279 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 279

Providing for the appointment of Manuel Luis Ibanez as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 19, 1993

 Mr. Mineta (for himself, Mr. Natcher, and Mr. McDade) introduced the 
  following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the appointment of Manuel Luis Ibanez as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the resignation of Anne Legendre Armstrong of Texas, is 
filled by the appointment of Manuel Luis Ibanez of Texas. The 
appointment is for a term of 6 years and shall take effect on the day 
after the effective date of the resignation of Anne Legendre Armstrong.

                                 <all>
```