alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          18,825
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              28
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,660
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    263,813
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         141,836
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           141,613
<LOANS>                                        590,438
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,065,733
<DEPOSITS>                                     868,548
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             13,425
<LONG-TERM>                                    100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,694
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,065,733
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 31,885
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               23,746
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                55,631
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              30,789
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,916
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           18,715
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,700
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  62
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,309
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         765
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       765
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.47
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,851
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 4,009
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,369
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,780
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,494
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,986
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,986
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,106
<FN>
<F1>FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:22-cr-00051-H-BU Document 32 Filed 11/10/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 56
Case 1:22-cr-00051-H-BU Document 32 Filed 11/10/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 57
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 216 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 216

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

      Designating January 16, 1994, as ``Religious Freedom Day''.



                                     


103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 216

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION


 
      Designating January 16, 1994, as ``Religious Freedom Day''.

Whereas December 15, 1991, is the 200th anniversary of the completion of the 
        ratification of the Bill of Rights;
Whereas the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States guarantees 
        religious liberty to the people of the United States;
Whereas millions of people from all parts of the world have come to the United 
        States fleeing religious persecution and seeking freedom to worship;
Whereas in 1777 Thomas Jefferson wrote the bill entitled ``A Bill for 
        Establishing Religious Freedom in Virginia'' to guarantee freedom of 
        conscience and separation of church and state;
Whereas in 1786, through the devotion of Virginians such as George Mason and 
        James Madison, the General Assembly of Virginia passed such bill;
Whereas the Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom inspired and shaped the 
        guarantees of religious freedom in the first amendment;
Whereas the Supreme Court of the United States has recognized repeatedly that 
        the Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom was an important influence 
        in the development of the Bill of Rights;
Whereas scholars across the United States have proclaimed the vital importance 
        of such statute and leaders in fields such as law and religion have 
        devoted time, energy, and resources to celebrating its contribution to 
        international freedom; and
Whereas America's First Freedom Center, located in Richmond, Virginia, plans a 
        permanent monument to the Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom, 
        accompanied by educational programs and commemorative activities for 
        visitors from around the world: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That January 16, 1994, is 
designated as ``Religious Freedom Day'', and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people 
of the United States to join together to celebrate their religious 
freedom and to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 
activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 18, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Institute of Standards and Technology

# AGENCY:

National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 2, notice is hereby given that there will be a meeting of the Board of Overseers of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award on Monday, December 4, 2000. The Board of Overseers is composed of eleven members prominent in the field of quality management and appointed by the Secretary of Commerce, assembled to advise the Secretary of Commerce on the conduct of the Baldrige Award. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss and review information received from the National Institute of Standards and Technology with the members of the Judges Panel of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. The agenda will include: Overview of the 2000 Baldrige Cycle, Report from the Judges' Panel, Program Status and Plans for 2001, Discussion of International Quality Award Meeting, Discussion of Plans/Issues and Development of Recommendations.

# DATES:

The meeting will convene December 4, 2000, at 8:30 a.m. and adjourn at 3:30 p.m. on December 4, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Chemistry Building, Red Room, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Harry Hertz, Director, National Quality Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, telephone number (301) 975-2361.

Dated: November 15, 2000.

Karen H. Brown,

Deputy Director.

[FR Doc. 00-29666 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-13-M
<page>  EXHIBIT 32.01





CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter
Davis, President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	 /s/ Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President of Demeter Management Corporation,
			the general partner of the Partnership

Date:		May 15, 2008
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

STATE OF TEXAS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-00780-M

ORDER

The Court takes notice of Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors’ Notices of Supplemental 

Authority (ECF Nos. 170, 172) without the necessity of granting any Request for Leave. 

SO ORDERED.

March 18, 2024.

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00780-M Document 175 Filed 03/18/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 5514
#### WEBB v. MOBLEY et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 13, 1952.

T. T. Burchell, Manchester, for movant.

Pleas Wm. Mobley, Manchester, and Eugene H. Clark, Manchester, for opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Clay Circuit Court. Judgment for the defendants in an action on a promissory note for $450. The court having considered the record is of the opinion that it presented a case for the jury. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
#### R&W Wine Bar Ltd. et al., Appellants, v Michael Abrams, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.), entered February 16, 1990, which permanently stayed claimants from proceeding with arbitration against respondent, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Claimants contend that the court improperly stayed the arbitration and failed to grant the extension. However, the actions of claimant demonstrate a willful failure to disclose after two court orders to do so, warranting the sanctions imposed *(see, Battaglia v Hofmeister,*100 AD2d 833). Further, the delay attributed to law office failure was not sufficient to excuse compliance *(see, e.g., Knapek v MV Southwest Cape,*110 AD2d 928). Concur—Carro, J. P., Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHEEZA RIZVI,

 

 Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED CITIZENSHIP AND

IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al.

 Defendants. 

 Case No. 3:22-cv-1100

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(i)

Since the filing of this lawsuit, Defendants have finally adjudicated the long-pending 

application of the Plaintiff Sheeza Rizvi. As such, the present lawsuit is now moot.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff Sheeza Rizvi hereby voluntarily 

dismisses the instant action with prejudice. Each side to bear their own fees and costs. 

/s/ James O. Hacking, III

James O. Hacking, III, MO Bar # 46728

Hacking Immigration Law, LLC

10900 Manchester Rd., Suite 203

St. Louis, MO 63122

Phone: 314.961-8200

Fax: 314.961.8201

Email: jim@hackingimmigrationlaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 3:22-cv-01100-B-BN Document 7 Filed 07/18/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 73
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 23, 2022, the foregoing Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was 

filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court to be served by operation of the Court’s electronic 

filing system.

/s/ James. O. Hacking, III

James O. Hacking, III, MO Bar # 46728

Hacking Immigration Law, LLC

Case 3:22-cv-01100-B-BN Document 7 Filed 07/18/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 74
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 50047 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

–

Appellee ,

v.
SAIMY DONAEL HERNANDEZ

- PORTILLO , Defendant

– Appellant

.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:14

- CR

- 1121

- 1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Saimy Donael Hernandez

- Portillo has moved for le ave to withdraw and has filed brief s in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez

- Portillo h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief s and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 5, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-50047 Document: 00514373058 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/05/2018No. 16

- 50047

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion f or leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-50047 Document: 00514373058 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/05/2018
#### MATHIS v. STATE.

No. 26057.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 19, 1952.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for violation of the liquor law with a fine of $100.

The record brought forward contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. The proceedings appear regular and nothing is presented for the consideration of this court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### DEEN v. STATE.

No. 23387.

Court of Criminar Appeals of Textas.

June 12, 1946.

*1008Smith & Smith, of Anson, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

From a conviction for driving while intoxicated an automobile upon a public highway, with an assessed fine of $50, appellant appeals.

The complaint, and information were filed on December 26, 1945, and alleged that the offense was committed on December 22, 1945.

The judgment is dated December 26th and recites that appellant appeared before the court and entered a plea of guilty after being admonished by the court of the consequences thereof.

Upon the hearing of a motion for new trial the following facts were developed: Appellant was arrested on December 22d by a highway patrolman and turned over to the Sheriff of Jones County. The County Judge was out of the county and was not expected to return before December 26th. Appellant asked the sheriff what the fine would be and was advised that he (the sheriff) did not know exactly but it would likely be $50 and a suspension of his driver’s license for six months, and that the court costs would be $20.80, whereupon appellant gave the sheriff a check for $70.80, and delivered to the sheriff his (appellant’s) driver’s license, and appellant was released by the sheriff. When 'the County Judge returned *on*December 26th, the complaint and information were filed and judgment entered. Appellant was never in court and never authorized any one to enter a plea of guilty for him. The sheriff evidently construed appellant’s act in giving the check as such authorization and says he was doing what he did to help appellant. Conceding that all parties were acting in good faith, the fact remains that appellant was never before the court, and no attorney nor any one else was before the court who was authorized to represent appellant. Under the circumstances, the judgment was entered without authority of law and the motion for'a new trial should have been granted. The reasons for this holding are elaborated in Ex parte Jones, 46 Tex.Cr.R. 433, 80 S.W. 995; Cramer v. State, 133 Tex. Cr.R. 213, 109 S.W.2d 1054; Ex parte Grimes, 81 Tex.Cr.R. 405, 195 S.W. 858.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-10605

Summary Calendar

_____________________

ILLES P. CSORBA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

VARO, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas

(3:94-CV-1250-T)

_________________________________________________________________

December 11, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Because a final judgment has been entered, this appeal is

moot. Therefore, this appeal is

D I S M I S S E D.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28697]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importation of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated August 22, 2000, and published in the Federal 
Register on September 6, 2000, (65 FR 54067), ISP Freetown Fine 
Chemicals, Inc., 238 South Main Street, Assonet, Massachusetts 02702, 
made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be 
registered as an importer of phenylacetone (8501), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in Schedule II.
    The firm plans to import the phenylacetone to manufacture 
amphetamine.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in Title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and 
determined that the registration of IPS Freetown Fine Chemicals, Inc., 
is consistent with the public interest and with United States 
obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in 
effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated ISP Freetown 
Fine Chemicals, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is 
consistent with the public interest. This investigation included 
inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 
verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to Section 1008(a) of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act 
and in accordance with Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, 
Sec. 1301.34, the above firm is granted registration as an importer of 
the basic class of controlled substance listed above.

    Dated: October 18, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-28697 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
Exhibit 35.6  LOGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084,
8th Floor 401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase
Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National
Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C32 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall
have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of
Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:  1.
A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.  LOGO ____________________________ Leslie Hayton Managing Director Wells Fargo Bank  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

LOGO
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Michael P. Mack, Chief Executive Officer of Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp. (the Registrant), do hereby certify
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (Section 906) that, based on my knowledge:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



Dated: February 5, 2004



/s/    MICHAEL P.
MACKMichael P. MackChief Executive Officer, President and Director




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Registrant and will be retained by Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.