alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [CA-160-1220-00]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior.

# ACTION:

Meeting of the Central California Resource Advisory Council. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (sec. 309), the Bureau of Land Management Resource Advisory Council for Central California will meet in Sacramento.

# DATES:

Thursday and Friday, November 30-December 1, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

BLM-California State Office, 2135 Butano Drive, Sacramento, CA 95825.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The 12 member Central California Resource Advisory Council is appointed by the Secretary of the Interior to advise the Bureau of Land Management on public land issues. On Friday morning, the Council will hold a satellite teleconference with Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, and will meet with new BLM-California State Director Mike Pool. Other agenda items for the two meetings include a discussion of the BLM land exchange program, and a review of Council's proposed standards and guidelines for the recreation program. There will be a public comment period at 11:30 a.m. Thursday and at 1 p.m. on Friday at which time the Council will hear comments on any public land issue. Written comments will also be accepted, either at the meeting or at the address below.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Larry Mercer, Public Affairs Officer, Bureau of Land Management, 3801 Pegasus Drive, Bakersfield, CA 93308, telephone 661-391-6010.

Dated: November 9, 2000.

Ron Fellows,

Field Manager.

[FR Doc. 00-29397  Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-40-M
Case 3:22-cv-00659-X-BK Document 3 Filed 03/22/22 Page 1 of 7 PageID 4
Case 3:22-cv-00659-X-BK Document 3 Filed 03/22/22 Page 2 of 7 PageID 5
Case 3:22-cv-00659-X-BK Document 3 Filed 03/22/22 Page 3 of 7 PageID 6
Case 3:22-cv-00659-X-BK Document 3 Filed 03/22/22 Page 4 of 7 PageID 7
Case 3:22-cv-00659-X-BK Document 3 Filed 03/22/22 Page 5 of 7 PageID 8
Case 3:22-cv-00659-X-BK Document 3 Filed 03/22/22 Page 6 of 7 PageID 9
Case 3:22-cv-00659-X-BK Document 3 Filed 03/22/22 Page 7 of 7 PageID 10
NO. 12-14-00328-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

DENNIS LYNCH, 

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 241ST 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant pleaded guilty to evading arrest, and the trial court assessed his punishment at 

confinement for two years. 

We have received the clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s certification 

showing that Appellant waived his right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The clerk’s 

record also includes a copy of the written waiver of Appellant’s right to appeal, which is signed 

by Appellant and his counsel. Additionally, Appellant’s counsel for this appeal has informed 

this court that, after sentencing, Appellant waived his right to appeal. Therefore, he concludes

the appeal must be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Opinion delivered June 24, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JUNE 24, 2015

NO. 12-14-00328-CR

DENNIS LYNCH,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 241st District Court 

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 241-1310-14)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the 

appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision 

be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131018 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131018 

 COA: 268156 

Muskegon CC: 04-049888-FH

LUCIUS WILKINS,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0724 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 31, 2006 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 296 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 296

  Commemorating the 125th anniversary of the birth of Mahatma Gandhi.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 23, 1994

Mr. Gephardt (for himself, Mr. Torricelli, Mr. Ackerman, and Mr. Brown 
   of Ohio) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Commemorating the 125th anniversary of the birth of Mahatma Gandhi.

Whereas October 2, 1994, marks the 125th anniversary of the birth of Mahatma 
        Gandhi;
Whereas Mahatma Gandhi was a great political leader, devout and spiritual Hindu, 
        and leader of India's nationalist movement;
Whereas all his life Gandhi championed and in fact gave his life for Hindu 
        Muslim amity;
Whereas Gandhi helped to make India the largest democracy in the world;
Whereas his philosophy of nonviolent civil disobedience has influenced people 
        around the world for the betterment of mankind; and
Whereas as a result of his work, Gandhi's name has come to symbolize freedom and 
        justice: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress of the United States--
            (1) recognizes October 2, 1994, as the 125th anniversary of 
        the birth of Mahatma Gandhi;
            (2) acknowledges and commends Mahatma Gandhi's unique and 
        lasting role in the establishment of the state of India and its 
        democratic institutions, which will be felt for generations to 
        come; and
            (3) congratulates the visionary leadership of Mahatma 
        Gandhi, which enhanced the friendship between the United States 
        and India, the world's oldest and largest democracy, 
        respectively.
                                 <all>
```
#### SHELTON v. STATE.

No. 25523.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 28, 1951.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George ,P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of robbery, and upon his trial before the court, he was assessed a penalty of l'S years in the state penitentiary.

The evidence fully sustains the conviction. No complaints of any matters of procedure have been brought forward by bills of exception.

The judgment is affirmed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PETERSON METELLUS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 1041

[ October 25, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Marni A. Bryson , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502013CF03475AMB

.

Jerrard B. Cutrone, Miami, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Mark J. Hamel and Joseph D. Coronato, Jr. , Assistant Attorney s General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIA M

.

Affirmed

. See Martin v. State , 797 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (Issues I, II, IV); Jackson v. State , 698 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (Issue III).

W ARNER
, L EVINE
, JJ., and B UCHANAN

, L AURIE E., Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 130

To designate the week of March 21, 1993, through March 27, 1993, as

‘‘International Student Awareness Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1993

Mr. HANSEN (for himself, Mr. KASICH, Mr. FILNER, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. ORTON, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. MORAN, and Mr. MARTINEZ)

introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the week of March 21, 1993, through March

27, 1993, as ‘‘International Student Awareness Week’’.

Whereas international student exchange programs provide

students with an enriched and improved quality of life

through first-hand experience with different cultures;

Whereas international student exchange programs provide

fertile training ground for future world leaders;

Whereas international student exchange programs make enormous strides toward world peace through understanding;
2

•HJ 130 IH

Whereas international student exchange programs enrich a

student’s understanding of the United States and its

communities; and

Whereas the United States recognizes the need for an increased awareness of such valuable programs: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week of March 21, 1993, through March 27,

4 1993, is designated as ‘‘International Student Awareness

5 Week’’. The President is authorized and requested to issue

6 a proclamation calling upon the people of the United

7 States to observe the week with appropriate ceremonies

8 and activities.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF BERTHEL GROWTH & INCOME
TRUST I AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND THE UNAUDITED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF
THE TRUST FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          33,505
<SECURITIES>                                 3,865,722
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,215,191
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,000,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,114,418
<PP&E>                                           3,417<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,117,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          423,599
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     6,578,163
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (883,927)<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,117,835
<SALES>                                        352,477
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               352,477
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               221,721
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,000,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (869,244)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (869,244)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (869,244)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (129.00)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (129.00)
<FN>
<F1>NET INCOME PER BENEFICIAL SHARE IS BASED ON THE WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF SHARES
OUTSTANDING WHICH WAS 8,053 SHARES FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
<F2>ORGANIZATIONAL COSTS - NET
<F3>RETAINED EARNINGS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Case 4:22-mj-00587-BP Document 19 Filed 08/01/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 30
# C_2004094EN.01000702.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/7

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

4 March 2004

In Case C-264/02 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d'instance de Vienne): Cofinoga Mérignac SA v Sylvain Sachithanathan (1)

1

(Directives 87/102/EEC and 90/88/EEC - Consumer credit - Consumer information - Annual percentage rate of charge - Variable interest rate - Renewal of an agreement)

(2004/C 94/13)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-264/02: References to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Tribunal d'instance de Vienne (France) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Cofinoga Mérignac SA and Sylvain Sachithanathan, on the interpretation of Council Directive 87/102/EEC of 22 December 1986 for the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning consumer credit (OJ 1987 L 42, p. 48), as amended by Council Directive 90/88/EEC of 22 February 1990 (OJ 1990 L 61, p. 14), the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: P. Jann (Rapporteur), acting for the President of the Fifth Chamber, C.W.A. Timmermans and S. von Bahr, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 4 March 2004, in which it has ruled:

Council Directive 87/102/EEC of 22 December 1986 for the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning consumer credit, as amended by Council Directive 90/88/EEC of 22 February 1990, does not require, before each renewal, on the existing terms and conditions, of a credit agreement for a specified period entered into in the form of a credit facility that may be drawn down in instalments and is linked to a credit card, that is repayable in monthly instalments and bears an interest rate that is expressed to be variable, that the lender inform the borrower in writing of the current annual percentage rate of charge and of the conditions under which the latter may be amended.

---

(1)  OJ C 233 of 28.09.2002.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 222 (Thursday, November 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29294]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant To the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    Under Section 122(d) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, 
notice is hereby given that on October 10, 2000, a proposed Partial 
Consent Decree (``Decree'') in two consolidated cases, United States v. 
Allied Battery Co., Civil No. CV-98-N-0446-S, and United States v. CSX 
Transportation, Inc., Civil No. CV-98-N-2561, was lodged with the 
United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. In 
this action, the United States seeks recovery of its response costs 
incurred by EPA in cleaning up contaminated soil at the Carlie Lee 
Superfund Site, a former battery cracking operation located in Tarrant 
City, Alabama, near Birmingham. Under this Decree, four settling 
defendants--Allied Battery Co., Econo Battery Services, Fairfield Iron 
& Metals, Inc. and Joseph J. McCleney, Jr.--have agreed to pay separate 
amounts, collectively totaling $36,000, in partial reimbursement of the 
United States' response costs.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments concerning the proposed 
Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney 
General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of 
Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC, 20044-7611, and should refer to 
United States v. Allied Battery Co. D.J. Ref. 90-11-3-1758, and United 
States v. CSX Transportation, Inc., D.J. Ref. 90-11-3-1758/1.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama, 200 Robert 
Vance Federal Bldg., 1800 5th Ave. N., Birmingham, Alabama; and (2) the 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 
Atlanta, Georgia. A copy of the Decree may also be obtained by mail 
from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 
Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611. In requesting a copy, please 
enclose a check in the amount of $6.25 (25 cents per page reproduction 
cost) payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Walker B. Smith,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment & Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-29294 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Docket Files EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0543

A. Notices

1. Proposed Rule - Determination of Attainment of the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards; Eastern San Luis Obispo, California, 81 FR 70382 (October 12, 2016)

B. FR Notices

1. 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008)

2. 77 FR 30088 (May 21, 2012)

3. 80 FR 65292 (October 26, 2015) 

4. 81 FR 26697 (May 4, 2016) 

C. Other Documents

1. Letter from Meredith Kurpius, Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office, EPA Region IX, to Larry Allen, 

Air Pollution Control Officer, SLOCAPCD, dated December 11, 2013.

2. Letter from Meredith Kurpius, Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office, EPA Region IX, to Larry Allen, 

Air Pollution Control Officer, SLOCAPCD, dated October 27, 2014.

3. Letters from Meredith Kurpius, Manager, Air Quality Analysis Office, EPA Region IX, to Larry 

Allen, Air Pollution Control Officer, SLOCAPCD, dated October 26, 2015. 

4. Letter from Elizabeth J. Adams, Acting Director, Air Division, EPA Region IX, to Richard Corey, 

Executive Officer, CARB, dated August 31, 2016, transmitting findings of the EPA’s 2015 TSA of 

the CARB's ambient air monitoring program. 

5. Letter from Larry Allen, Air Pollution Control Officer, SLOCAPCD, to Alexis Strauss, Acting 

Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX, regarding 2015 Annual SLAMS Data Certification, 

certifying calendar year 2015 ambient air quality data and quality assurance data, April 19, 2016.

6. San Luis Obispo County APCD’s Annual Network Plan Report (July 2015).

7. Cover letter for San Luis Obispo County APCD’s Annual Network Plan Report (July 2015).

8. EPA, Air Quality System, Design Value Report, July 25, 2016.

9. EPA AQS Quick Look Report (AMP450), August 10, 2016.

10. CARB Annual Monitoring Network Report for Twenty-five Districts in California, Volume 1, June 

2015.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 30, 

2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-19-00340-CV

KENDERRICK MERRITT, Appellant 

V.

THE METHODIST HOSPITAL; THE METHODIST HOSPITAL – 

HOUSTON; THE METHODIST HOSPITAL SYSTEM; THE METHODIST 

HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, INC.; HOUSTON METHODIST; HOUSTON 

METHODIST HOSPITAL; HOUSTON METHODIST – TEXAS MEDICAL 

CENTER; MICHAEL T. MANN, M.D.; AND PATRICIO DE HOYOS 

ZAMBRANO, M.D., Appellees 

On Appeal from the 295th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-42856 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This is an attempted interlocutory appeal from an order granting Michael T. 

Mann, M.D.’s motion to dismiss with prejudice for failure to serve an expert report 

pursuant to Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 74.351(b)(2). The order 
2

was signed December 29, 2018. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed April 12, 

2019. 

Section 51.014 (a)(9) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code permits 

an interlocutory appeal from an order that “denies all or part of the relief sought by 

a motion under Section 74.351(b). . . of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. In an 

accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal must be filed within 20 days after the 

judgment or order is signed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b). In an accelerated appeal the 

deadline for filing a notice of appeal is strictly set at twenty days after the judgment 

is signed, with no exceptions, and filing a Rule 26.1(a) motion for new trial, motion 

to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate, or request for findings of fact and 

conclusions of law will not extend that deadline. In re K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d 923, 927 

(Tex. 2005). 

Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely and was not filed within the 

fifteen-day grace period allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3. 

On May 1, 2019, appellee Michael T. Mann filed a motion to dismiss this 

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant filed no response. Appellee Michael T. 

Mann’s motion is granted, and the appeal is ordered dismissed for lack of 

jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Spain and Poissant.