alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 71

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the twelfth annual National

Peace Officers’ Memorial Service.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1993

Mr. TRAFICANT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the twelfth

annual National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL

4 PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL SERVICE.

5 The National Fraternal Order of Police and its auxil6 iary shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, the

7 twelfth annual National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service,

8 on the Capitol grounds on May 15, 1993, or on such other

9 date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and

10 the President pro tempore of the Senate may jointly des-
2

•HCON 71 IH

1 ignate, in order to honor the 137 law enforcement officers

2 who died in the line of duty during 1992.

3 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The event authorized to be con5 ducted on the Capitol grounds under section 1 shall be

6 free of admission charge to the public and arranged not

7 to interfere with the needs of Congress, under conditions

8 to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and the

9 Capitol Police Board.

10 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The National

11 Fraternal Order of Police and its auxiliary shall assume

12 full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident

13 to all activities associated with the event.

14 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

15 (a) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—Subject to the

16 approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the National Fra17 ternal Order of Police and its auxiliary are authorized to

18 erect upon the Capitol grounds such stage, sound amplifi19 cation devices, and other related structures and equip20 ment, as may be required for the event authorized to be

21 conducted on the Capitol grounds under section 1.

22 (b) ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.—The Architect of

23 the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are authorized

24 to make any such additional arrangements as may be re25 quired to carry out the event.
3

•HCON 71 IH

Æ
#### WHITESIDE v. STATE.

No. 21874.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 4, 1942.

Walter L. Wray, of Hillsboro, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty,, of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Unlawfully selling whiskey in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts, in the absence of which the bills of exception appearing cannot be appraised.

The complaint and information are sufficient to charge the offense for which appellant was convicted.

No error appearing, the j'udgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### RUTHERFORD v. STATE.

No. 21520.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 26, 1941.

Cunningham, Lipscomb & Cole, of Bon-ham, for appellant.

Lloyd W.' Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for. the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Fannin County on a charge of driving an automobile while intoxicated.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The procedure appears to be regular and there is nothing presented for our review. The judgment of the trial court is accordingly affirmed.
<PAGE> 1                                                EXHIBIT 11.

MUSTANG SOFTWARE, INC.

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(In thousands, except earnings per share) (Unaudited)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>

                                                        Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended
                                                           June 30,              June 30, 
                                                        1998       1997     1998       1997
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding     3,451      3,384    3,435      3,379 
Common stock equivlents from outstanding stock options       0          0        0          0
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average common and common stock equivalents outstanding  3,451      3,384    3,435      3,379
==============================================================================================
Net Income                                               $(303)    $ (357)  $ (747)    $ (574)  	
==============================================================================================
Earnings per share (1)                                   $(.09)    $ (.11)  $ (.22)   $  (.17) 
==============================================================================================
</TABLE>

(1) Fully diluted earnings per share have not been presented because the effects
are not material.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 1

Case 4:22-cv-00482-BP Document 19-1 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 107
Case 4:22-cv-00482-BP Document 19-1 Filed 09/16/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 108
Order entered December 13, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01256

- CV

DEANNA AI LEE, Appellant

V.
KEVIN DUC NGUYEN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 255th Judic ial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 17

- 22786



### O RDER
The reporter’s record is overdue. The court received notice from the court reporter that appellant had not requested preparation of the reporter’s record. By letter dated N ovember 26, 2018, we instructed appellant to provide, within ten days, written verification that she had requested preparation of the reporter’s record and that she had paid or made arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee. We cautioned appellant that failu re to comply may result in the Court ordering the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. As of today’s date, appellant has not responded. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal be submitted without the reporter’s record. See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c). Appellant’s brief is due WITHIN THIRTY DAYS of the date of this
order.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
EX 32.1





CERTIFICATION





S. James Miller, Chief Executive Officer of ImageWare Systems, Inc. (the “Company”), and Wayne Wetherell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that, to the best of his knowledge:





1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and





2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Quarterly Report.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 9th day of February, 2012.





/s/    S. James MillerS. James MillerChief Executive Officer/s/    Wayne WetherellWayne WetherellChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ImageWare Systems, Inc. and will be retained by ImageWare Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 62 
          - [MO 117-1117; FRL-6900-7] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule. 

# SUMMARY:

EPA proposes to approve a revision to the state of Missouri's section 111(d) plan for controlling emissions from existing municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills. The plan was submitted to fulfill the requirements of sections 111 and 129 of the Clean Air Act. The revised state plan incorporates revisions to the Emissions Guideline for MSW landfills promulgated by EPA in 1998 and 1999. 

                        In the final rules section of the                         **Federal Register**                        , EPA is approving the state's submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no relevant adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further activity is contemplated in relation to this action. If EPA receives relevant adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn, and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed action. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.                     

# DATES:

Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by December 15, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

Comments may be mailed to Wayne Kaiser, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wayne Kaiser at (913) 551-7603. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    See the information provided in the direct final rule which is located in the rules section of the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

Dated: October 25, 2000 

Dennis Grams, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

[FR Doc. 00-29057 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: 

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems (1205).                    

*Date and Time:*                         December 4-5, 2000; 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Rooms 340 & 390, Arlington, Virginia.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Richard Fragaszy, Program Director, Geomechanics and Geotechnical Systems, Division of Civil and Mechanical Systems, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 545, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8360.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate nominations for the FY'01 Unsolicited Review Panel as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                     

Dated: October 31, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-28398  Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 238

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES

4 ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

5 The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Associa6 tion (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘As7 sociation’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public event,

8 soap box derby races, on the Capitol grounds on July 16,

9 1994, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House

10 of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the

11 Senate may jointly designate.
2

HCON 238 EH

1 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

2 The event to be carried out under this resolution shall

3 be free of admission charge to the public and arranged

4 not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under condi5 tions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and

6 the Capitol Police Board; except that the Association shall

7 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities

8 incident to all activities associated with the event.

9 SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

10 For the purposes of this resolution, the Association

11 is authorized to erect upon the Capitol grounds, subject

12 to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, such stage,

13 sound amplification devices, and other related structures

14 and equipment as may be required for the event to be car15 ried out under this resolution.

16 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

17 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

18 Board are authorized to make any such additional ar19 rangements that may be required to carry out the event

20 under this resolution.

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
3

HCON 238 EH
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 238

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the

Greater Washington Soap Box Derby.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ELIZABETH A. RAMSEY, §

TDCJ No. 1942389, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-1363-M

§

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE AND DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a 

Recommendation in this case. Objections were filed [ECF No. 27]. The District 

Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed 

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding the only error 

to be the non-material reference to Criminal Dist. Ct. No. 3 when the proper reference 

was to Ct. No. 2, the Court ACCEPTS the other Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Considering the record in this case and pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 22(b), Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing §§ 2254 and 2255 proceedings, 

and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. The Court 

adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions, 

Case 3:22-cv-01363-M-BN Document 28 Filed 02/28/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2175
2

and Recommendation filed in this case in support of its finding that Petitioner has 

failed to show that reasonable jurists would find “it debatable whether the petition 

states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” or “debatable whether [this 

Court] was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000).1

But, if Petitioner elects to file a notice of appeal, Petitioner may proceed in 

forma pauperis on appeal.

SO ORDERED this 28th day of February, 2023.

1

 Rule 11 of the Rules Governing §§ 2254 and 2255 Cases, as amended effective on 

December 1, 2009, reads as follows: 

(a) Certificate of Appealability. The district court must issue or deny a 

certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant. Before 

entering the final order, the court may direct the parties to submit arguments on whether a 

certificate should issue. If the court issues a certificate, the court must state the specific issue 

or issues that satisfy the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). If the court denies a 

certificate, the parties may not appeal the denial but may seek a certificate from the court of 

appeals under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22. A motion to reconsider a denial does 

not extend the time to appeal.

(b) Time to Appeal. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) governs the time 

to appeal an order entered under these rules. A timely notice of appeal must be filed even if 

the district court issues a certificate of appealability.

Case 3:22-cv-01363-M-BN Document 28 Filed 02/28/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2176
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 68156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29074]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force Meeting

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Aquatic Nuisance 
Species (ANS) Task Force. The meeting topics are identified in the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.


DATES: The Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force will meet from 8:30 a.m. 
to 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, November 28, 2000 and 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., 
Wednesday, November 29, 2000.

ADDRESSES: The ANS Task Force meeting will be held at the Arlington 
Hilton and Towers, 950 Stafford Street, Arlington, Virginia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Gross, Executive Secretary, 
Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force at 703-358-2308 or by e-mail at: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7c0f141d0e1312231b0e130f0f3c1a0b0f521b130a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d0e151c0f1213221a0f120e0e3d1b0a0e531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. I), this notice announces a 
meeting of the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force. The Task Force was 
established by the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and 
Control Act of 1990.
    Topics to be covered during the ANS Task Force meeting on Tuesday 
and Wednesday include: updates of activities from the Task Force's 
regional panels; a discussion on improving the coordination with the 
regional panels; a discussion of the ballast water management program; 
an overview of the activities of the Invasive Species Council and 
Invasive species Advisory Committee; updates from several Task Force 
sub-committees including the Communications, Education and Outreach 
Committee and the Risk Assessment committee; and other topics. Minutes 
of the meeting will be maintained by the Executive Secretary, Aquatic 
Nuisance Species Task Force, Suite 851, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, 
Arlington, Virginia 22203-1622, and will be available for public 
inspection during regular business hours, Monday through Friday.

    Dated: November 8, 2000.
Cathleen I. Short,
Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, Assistant Director--Fisheries and 
Habitat Conservation.
[FR Doc. 00-29074 Filed 11-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 4:22-mj-00469-BP Document 10 Filed 06/29/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 20
September 15 , 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

AUNDRA B. JACKSON , Appellant

NO. 14

- 16

- 00616

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISS ED. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.