Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 15, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 68905

promulgated on March 12, 1996. One

state rule is applicable to the St. Louis

area, 10 CSR 10–5.490, and the other is

applicable to the remainder of the state,

10 CSR 10–6.310.

The Missouri Department of Natural

Resources (MDNR) recently revised

these two rules to incorporate the EPA

revisions. The state rules became

effective on July 30, 2000. The state has

incorporated these revised rules into its

revised 111(d) plan and submitted the

plan and rules to us for approval

pursuant to 111(d).

We have evaluated the state plan

revision against criteria in the EG and

against the plan approval criteria at 40

CFR 60.23 through 60.26, subpart B,

‘‘Adoption and Submittal of State Plans

for Designated Facilities.’’

The state plan meets all of the

applicable requirements of 40 CFR part

60, subpart B and subpart Cc.

Final Action

We are approving a revision to the

Missouri 111(d) plan for MSW landfills

which incorporates the most recent EPA

requirements.

Administrative Requirements

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR

51735, October 4, 1993), this action is

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and

therefore is not subject to review by the

Office of Management and Budget. This

action merely approves state law as

meeting Federal requirements and

imposes no additional requirements

beyond those imposed by state law.

Accordingly, the Administrator certifies

that this rule will not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities under the

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601

et seq.). Because this rule approves

preexisting requirements under state

law and does not impose any additional

enforceable duty beyond that required

by state law, it does not contain any

unfunded mandate or significantly or

uniquely affect small governments, as

described in the Unfunded Mandates

Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4).

For the same reason, this rule also does

not significantly or uniquely affect the

communities of tribal governments, as

specified by Executive Order 13084 (63

FR 27655, May 10, 1998). This rule will

not have substantial direct effects on the

states, on the relationship between the

national government and the states, or

on the distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government, as specified in

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,

August 10, 1999), because it merely

approves a state rule implementing a

Federal standard, and does not alter the

relationship or the distribution of power

and responsibilities established in the

CAA. This rule also is not subject to

Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,

April 23, 1997), because it is not

economically significant.

In reviewing state plan submissions,

our role is to approve state choices,

provided that they meet the criteria of

the CAA. In this context, in the absence

of a prior existing requirement for the

state to use voluntary consensus

standards (VCS), we have no authority

to disapprove a state plan for failure to

use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent

with applicable law for EPA, when it

reviews a state plan, to use VCS in place

of a state plan that otherwise satisfies

the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the

requirements of section 12(d) of the

National Technology Transfer and

Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.

272 note) do not apply. As required by

section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61

FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing

this rule, we have taken the necessary

steps to eliminate drafting errors and

ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,

and provide a clear legal standard for

affected conduct. EPA has complied

with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR

8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the

takings implications of the rule in

accordance with the ‘‘Attorney

General’s Supplemental Guidelines for

the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of

Unanticipated Takings’ issued under the

Executive Order. This rule does not

impose an information collection

burden under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

The Congressional Review Act, 5

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides

that before a rule may take effect, the

agency promulgating the rule must

submit a rule report, which includes a

copy of the rule, to each House of the

Congress and to the Comptroller General

of the United States. We will submit a

report containing this rule and other

required information to the United

States Senate, the United States House

of Representatives, and the Comptroller

General of the United States prior to

publication of the rule in the Federal

Register. A major rule cannot take effect

until 60 days after it is published in the

Federal Register. This action is not a

‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.

804(2).

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,

petitions for judicial review of this

action must be filed in the United States

Court of Appeals for the appropriate

circuit by January 16, 2001. Filing a

petition for reconsideration by the

Administrator of this final rule does not

affect the finality of this rule for the

purposes of judicial review nor does it

extend the time within which a petition

for judicial review may be filed, and

shall not postpone the effectiveness of

such rule or action. This action may not

be challenged later in proceedings to

enforce its requirements. (See section

307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, Carbon monoxide,

Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by

reference, Intergovernmental relations,

Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting

and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur

oxides.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Dated: October 25, 2000.

Dennis Grams,

Regional Administrator, Region 7.

Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of

Federal Regulations is amended as

follows:

PART 62—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for Part 62

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

Subpart AA—Missouri

2. Section 62.6357 is amended by

adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:

§ 62.6357 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(d) Amended plan for the control of

air emissions from Municipal Solid

Waste Landfills submitted by the

Missouri Department of Natural

Resources on September 8, 2000. The

effective date of the amended plan is

January 16, 2001.

[FR Doc. 00–29058 Filed 11–14–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 62

[FL–86–200028(a); FRL–6902–4]

Approval and Promulgation of State

Plans for Designated Facilities and

Pollutants: Florida

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) is approving the section

111(d) Plan submitted by the Florida

68906 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 15, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

Department of Environmental Protection

(DEP) for the State of Florida on

September 16, 1999, to implement and

enforce the Emissions Guidelines (EG)

for existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious

Waste Incinerator (HMIWI) units.

DATES: This direct final rule is effective

on January 16, 2001, without further

notice, unless EPA receives adverse

comment by December 15, 2000. If EPA

receives adverse comment, we will

publish a timely withdrawal of the

direct final rule in the Federal Register

and inform the public that the rule will

not take effect.

ADDRESSES: You should address

comments on this action to Joey

LeVasseur, EPA Region 4, Air Planning

Branch, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta,

Georgia 30303–3104. Copies of all

materials considered in this rulemaking

may be examined during normal

business hours at the following

locations: EPA Region 4, Sam Nunn

Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth

Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–

3104; and at the Florida Department of

Environmental Protection, Air

Resources Management Division, Twin

Towers Office Building, 2600 Blair

Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32399–

2400.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joey

LeVasseur at (404) 562–9035 or Scott

Davis at (404) 562–9127.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. What action is being taken by EPA today?

II. The HMIWI State Plan Requirement

What is a HMIWI State Plan?

Why are we requiring Florida to submit a

HMIWI State Plan?

Why do we need to regulate air emissions

from HMIWIs?

What criteria must a HMIWI State Plan

meet to be approved?

III. What does the Florida State Plan contain?

IV. Is my HMIWI subject to these regulations?

V. What steps do I need to take?

VI. Why is the Florida HMIWI State Plan

approvable?

VII. Administrative Requirements

I. What Action Is Being Taken by EPA

Today?

We are approving the Florida State

Plan, as submitted on September 16,

1999, for the control of air emissions

from HMIWIs, except for those HMIWIs

located in Indian Country. When EPA

developed our New Source Performance

Standard (NSPS) for HMIWIs, we also

developed EG to control air emissions

from older HMIWIs. (See 62 FR 48348–

48391, September 15, 1997, 40 CFR part

60, subpart Ce [Emission Guidelines and

Compliance Times for HMIWIs] and

subpart Ec [Standards of Performance

for HMIWIs for Which Construction is

Commenced After June 20, 1996]). The

Florida DEP developed a State Plan, as

required by sections 111(d) and 129 of

the Clean Air Act (the Act), to adopt the

EG into their body of regulations, and

we are acting today to approve it.

We are publishing this action without

prior proposal because we view this as

a noncontroversial amendment and

anticipate no adverse comments.

However, in a separate document in this

Federal Register publication, we are

proposing to approve the revision

should significant, material, and adverse

comments be filed. This action is

effective January 16, 2001, unless by

December 15, 2000, adverse or critical

comments are received. If we receive

such comments, this action will be

withdrawn before the effective date by

publishing a subsequent notice that will

withdraw the final action. All public

comments received will be addressed in

a subsequent final rule based on this

action serving as a proposed rule. We

will not institute a second comment

period on this action. Any parties

interested in commenting on this action

should do so at this time. If no such

comments are received, this action is

effective January 16, 2001.

II. The HMIWI State Plan Requirement

What Is a HMIWI State Plan?

A HMIWI State Plan is a plan to

control air pollutant emissions from

existing incinerators which burn

hospital waste or medical/infectious

waste. The plan also includes source

and emission inventories of these

incinerators in the State.

Why Are We Requiring Florida To

Submit a HMIWI State Plan?

States are required under sections

111(d) and 129 of the Act to submit

State Plans to control emissions from

existing HMIWIs in the State. The State

Plan requirement was triggered when

EPA published the EG for HMIWIs

under 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ce (see

62 FR 48348, September 15, 1997).

Under section 129, EPA is required to

promulgate EG for several types of

existing solid waste incinerators. These

EG establish the Maximum Achievable

Control Technology (MACT) standards

that States must adopt to comply with

the Act. The HMIWI EG also establishes

requirements for monitoring, operator

training, permits, and a waste

management plan that must be included

in State Plans.

The intent of the State Plan

requirement is to reduce several types of

air pollutants associated with waste

incineration.

Why Do We Need To Regulate Air

Emissions From HMIWIs?

The State Plan establishes control

requirements which reduce the

following emissions from HMIWIs:

particulate matter; sulfur dioxide;

hydrogen chloride; nitrogen oxides;

carbon monoxide; lead; cadmium;

mercury; and dioxin/furans. These

pollutants can cause adverse effects to

the public health and the environment.

Dioxin, lead, and mercury

bioaccumulate through the food web.

Serious developmental and adult effects

in humans, primarily damage to the

nervous system, have been associated

with exposures to mercury. Exposure to

dioxin and furans can cause skin

disorders, cancer, and reproductive

effects such as endometriosis. Dioxin

and furans can also affect the immune

system. Acid gases affect the respiratory

tract, as well as contribute to the acid

rain that damages lakes and harms

forests and buildings. Exposure to

particulate matter has been linked with

adverse health effects, including

aggravation of existing respiratory and

cardiovascular disease and increased

risk of premature death. Nitrogen oxide

emissions contribute to the formation of

ground level ozone, which is associated

with a number of adverse health and

environmental effects.

What Criteria Must a HMIWI State Plan

Meet To Be Approved?

The criteria for approving a HMIWI

State Plan include requirements from

sections 111(d) and 129 of the Act and

40 CFR part 60, subpart B. Under the

requirements of sections 111(d) and 129

of the Act, a State Plan must be at least

as protective as the EG regarding

applicability, emission limits,

compliance schedules, performance

testing, monitoring and inspections,

operator training and certification,

waste management plans, and

recordkeeping and reporting. Under

section 129(e), State Plans must ensure

that affected HMIWI facilities submit

Title V permit applications to the State

by September 15, 2000. Under the

requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subpart

B, the criteria for an approvable section

111(d) plan include demonstration of

legal authority, enforceable

mechanisms, public participation

documentation, source and emission

inventories, and a State progress report

commitment.

III. What Does the Florida State Plan

Contain?

The Florida DEP adopted the Federal

NSPS and EG by reference into the

Florida Administrative Code, Rules 62–

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 15, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 68907

204.800(7)(b) and 62–204.800(8)(d). The

State rules were effective on September

1, 1999. The Florida State Plan contains:

1. A demonstration of the State’s legal

authority to implement the section

111(d) State Plan;

2. State rule, Rule 62–204.800(8)(d),

as the enforceable mechanism;

3. An inventory of approximately 32

known designated facilities, along with

estimates of their potential air

emissions;

4. Emission limits that are as

protective as the EG;

5. A compliance date of one year from

the effective date of this State Plan

approval;

6. Testing, monitoring, reporting and

recordkeeping requirements for the

designated facilities;

7. Records from the public hearing on

the State Plan; and,

8. Provisions for progress reports to

EPA.

IV. Is My HMIWI Subject to These

Regulations?

The EG for existing HMIWIs affect any

HMIWI built on or before June 20, 1996.

If your facility meets this criterion, you

are subject to these regulations.

V. What Steps Do I Need To Take?

You must meet the requirements

listed in the Florida Administrative

Code, Rule 62–204.800(8)(d),

summarized as follows:

1. Determine the size of your

incinerator by establishing its maximum

design capacity.

2. Each size category of HMIWI has

certain emission limits established

which your incinerator must meet. See

Table 1 of 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ce,

to determine the specific emission

limits which apply to you. The emission

limits apply at all times, except during

startup, shutdown, or malfunctions,

provided that no waste has been

charged during these events. (40 CFR

60.33e, as listed at 62 FR 48382,

September 15, 1997).

3. There are provisions to address

small rural incinerators (40 CFR

60.33e(b), 60.36e, 60.37e(c)(d), and

60.38e(b), as listed at 62 FR 48380,

September 15, 1997).

4. You must meet a 10% opacity limit

on your discharge, averaged over a sixminute block. (40 CFR 60.33e(c), as

listed at 62 FR 48380, September 15,

1997).

5. You must have a qualified HMIWI

operator available to supervise the

operation of your incinerator. This

operator must be trained and qualified

through a State-approved program, or a

training program that meets the

requirements listed under 40 CFR part

60.53c(c). (40 CFR 60.34e, as listed at 62

FR 48380).

6. Your operator must be certified, as

discussed in 5 above, no later than one

year after EPA approval of this Florida

State Plan. (40 CFR 60.39e(e), as listed

at 62 FR 48382).

7. You must develop and submit to

Florida DEP a waste management plan.

This plan must be developed under

guidance provided by the American

Hospital Association publication, An

Ounce of Prevention: Waste Reduction

Strategies for Health Care Facilities,

1993, and must be submitted to Florida

DEP no later than 60 days following the

initial performance test for the affected

unit. (40 CFR 60.35e, as listed at 62 FR

48380).

8. You must conduct an initial

performance test to determine your

incinerators compliance with these

emission limits. This performance test

must be completed as required under 40

CFR 60.8.

9. You must install and maintain

devices to monitor the parameters listed

under Table 3 to Subpart Ec (40 CFR

60.37e(c), as listed at 62 FR 48381).

10. You must document and maintain

information concerning pollutant

concentrations, opacity measurements,

charge rates, and other operational data.

This information must be maintained

for a period of five years. (40 CFR

60.38e, as listed at 62 FR 48381).

11. You must submit an annual report

to Florida DEM containing records of

annual equipment inspections, any

required maintenance, and unscheduled

repairs. This annual report must be

signed by the facilities manager. (40

CFR 60.38e, as listed at 62 FR 48381).

VI. Why Is the Florida HMIWI State

Plan Approvable?

EPA compared the Florida rules

(Florida Administrative Code, Rule 62–

204.800(8)(d) against our HMIWI EG.

EPA finds the Florida rules to be at least

as protective as the EG. The Florida

State Plan was reviewed for approval

against the following criteria: 40 CFR

60.23 through 60.26, Subpart B—

Adoption and Submittal of State Plans

for Designated Facilities; and, 40 CFR

60, 60.30e through 60.39e, Subpart Ce—

Emission Guidelines and Compliance

Times for Hospital/Medical/Infectious

Waste Incinerators. The Florida State

Plan satisfies the requirements for an

approvable section 111(d) plan under

subparts B and Ce of 40 CFR part 60. For

these reasons, we are approving the

Florida HMIWI State Plan.

VII. Administrative Requirements

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR

51735, October 4, 1993), this action is

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and

therefore is not subject to review by the

Office of Management and Budget. This

action merely approves state law as

meeting federal requirements and

imposes no additional requirements

beyond those imposed by state law.

Accordingly, the Administrator certifies

that this rule will not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities under the

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601

et seq.). Because this rule approves preexisting requirements under state law

and does not impose any additional

enforceable duty beyond that required

by state law, it does not contain any

unfunded mandate or significantly or

uniquely affect small governments, as

described in the Unfunded Mandates

Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4).

For the same reason, this rule also does

not significantly or uniquely affect the

communities of tribal governments, as

specified by Executive Order 13084 (63

FR 27655, May 10, 1998). This rule will

not have substantial direct effects on the

States, on the relationship between the

national government and the States, or

on the distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government, as specified in

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,

August 10, 1999), because it merely

approves a state rule implementing a

federal standard, and does not alter the

relationship or the distribution of power

and responsibilities established in the

Clean Air Act. This rule also is not

subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR

19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not

economically significant.

In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s

role is to approve state choices,

provided that they meet the criteria of

the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the

absence of a prior existing requirement

for the State to use voluntary consensus

standards (VCS), EPA has no authority

to disapprove a SIP submission for

failure to use VCS. It would thus be

inconsistent with applicable law for

EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,

to use VCS in place of a SIP submission

that otherwise satisfies the provisions of

the Clean Air Act. Thus, the

requirements of section 12(d) of the

National Technology Transfer and

Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.

272 note) do not apply. As required by

section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61

FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing

this rule, EPA has taken the necessary

steps to eliminate drafting errors and

ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,

and provide a clear legal standard for

affected conduct. EPA has complied

with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR

68908 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 15, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the

takings implications of the rule in

accordance with the ‘‘Attorney

General’s Supplemental Guidelines for

the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of

Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under

the executive order. This rule does not

impose an information collection

burden under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

The Congressional Review Act, 5

U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by

the Small Business Regulatory

Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,

generally provides that before a rule

may take effect, the agency

promulgating the rule must submit a

rule report, which includes a copy of

the rule, to each House of the Congress

and to the Comptroller General of the

United States. EPA will submit a report

containing this rule and other required

information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.

House of Representatives, and the

Comptroller General of the United

States prior to publication of the rule in

the Federal Register. A major rule

cannot take effect until 60 days after it

is published in the Federal Register.

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as

defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of

this action must be filed in the United

States Court of Appeals for the

appropriate circuit by January 16, 2001.

Filing a petition for reconsideration by

the Administrator of this final rule does

not affect the finality of this rule for the

purposes of judicial review nor does it

extend the time within which a petition

for judicial review may be filed, and

shall not postpone the effectiveness of

such rule or action. This action may not

be challenged later in proceedings to

enforce its requirements. (See section

307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62

Environmental protection,

Administrative practice and procedure,

Air pollution control, Hospital/medical/

infectious waste incineration,

Intergovernmental relations, Reporting

and recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: October 25, 2000.

A. Stanley Meiburg,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

40 CFR part 62 of the Code of Federal

Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 62—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 62

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7642.

Subpart K—Florida

2. Section 62.2350 is amended by

adding paragraphs (b)(7) and (c)(5) to

read as follows:

§ 62.2350 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(b) * * *

(7) State of Florida Department of

Environmental Protection Section

111(d) State Plan for Hospital/Medical/

Infectious Waste Incinerators, submitted

on September 16, 1999, by the Florida

Department of Environmental

Protection.

(c) * * *

(5) Existing hospital/medical/

infectious waste incinerators.

3. Subpart K is amended by adding a

new § 62.2370 and a new undesignated

center heading to read as follows:

Air Emissions From Hospital/Medical/

Infectious Waste Incinerators

§ 62.2370 Identification of sources.

The plan applies to existing hospital/

medical/infectious waste incinerators

for which construction, reconstruction,

or modification was commenced before

June 20, 1996, as described in 40 CFR

part 60, subpart Ce.

[FR Doc. 00–29217 Filed 11–14–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[OPP–301060; FRL–6747–3]

RIN 2070–AB78

Copper Sulfate Pentahydrate;

Exemption from the Requirement of a

Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an

exemption from the requirement of a

tolerance for residues of copper sulfate

pentahydrate when applied as a

fungicide to raw agricultural

commodities after harvest. Magna Bon

Corporation submitted a petition to EPA

under the Federal Food, Drug, and

Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Food

Quality Protection Act of 1996

requesting an exemption from the

requirement of a tolerance. This

regulation eliminates the need to

establish a maximum permissible level

for residues of copper sulfate

pentahydrate. In this final rule, the

Agency is also reordering the structure

of 40 CFR 180.1001(b)(1) and 180.1021

to group most of the copper exemptions

together. The reordering does not

change the regulatory status of these

chemicals.

DATES: This regulation is effective

November 15, 2000. Objections and

requests for hearings, identified by

docket control number OPP–301060

must be received by EPA on or before

January 16, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written objections and

hearing requests may be submitted by

mail, in person, or by courier. Please

follow the detailed instructions for each

method as provided in Unit VIII. of the

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. To ensure

proper receipt by EPA, your objections

and hearing requests must identify

docket control number OPP–301060 in

the subject line on the first page of your

response.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By

mail: Treva Alston, Registration

Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide

Programs, Environmental Protection

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,

Washington, DC 20460; telephone

number: (703) 308–8373; and e-mail

address: alston.treva@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

You may be affected by this action if

you are an agricultural producer, food

manufacturer, or pesticide

manufacturer. Potentially affected

categories and entities may include, but

are not limited to:

Categories NAICS

Examples of Potentially Affected

Entities

Industry ..... 111 Crop production

.............. 112 Animal production

.............. 311 Food manufacturing

.............. 32532 Pesticide manufacturing

This listing is not intended to be

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide

for readers regarding entities likely to be

affected by this action. Other types of

entities not listed in the table could also

be affected. The North American

Industrial Classification System

(NAICS) codes have been provided to

assist you and others in determining

whether or not this action might apply

to certain entities. If you have questions

regarding the applicability of this action

to a particular entity, consult the person

listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT.