alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20188 Summary Calendar

AL YASA MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-CV-2971

- - - - - - - - - - December 11, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Irving Elliot, also known as Al Yasa Muhammad, Texas prisoner # 384725, appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendant in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. Muhammad argues that the defendant violated his First Amendment right to exercise his religious freedom by imposing a grooming policy which does not allow him to grow aNo. 97-20188 -2- beard. The defendant’s grooming policy does not violate Muhammad’s First Amendment rights because the policy is rationally related to the defendant’s legitimate penological interests, including security, inmate identification, safety, and discipline. See Powell v. Estelle , 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir. 1992). Muhammad argues the defendant violated his First Amendment rights by failing to provide a pork-free diet. Because Muhammad did not present competent summary judgment evidence in the district court to show that there was a genuine issue of material fact concerning whether he was forced to eat pork or denied an adequate protein substitute on a particular date, the district court did not err in holding that the defendant did not fail to provide a pork-free diet in violation of Muhammad’s First Amendment rights. See Celotex v. Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986)(nonmoving party must produce evidence or set forth specific facts showing existence of genuine issue for trial); Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 10 (5th Cir. 1994). Muhammad argues that the defendant violated his First Amendment rights by failing to provide an adequate number of Muslim chaplains. The summary judgment evidence in the record indicates that the number of Muslim chaplains is proportionate to the number of Muslim inmates in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Muhammad does not have a constitutional right to receive facilities or personnel identical to that of moreNo. 97-20188 -3- populous denominations. See Ganther v. Ingle , 75 F.3d 207, 211 (5th Cir. 1996). Muhammad argues that the defendant violated his First Amendment rights by failing to provide a Muslim library. Prisons do not have an affirmative duty to provide religious materials or other religious articles free of charge to inmates. See Frank v. Terrell , 858 F.2d 1090, 1090 (5th Cir. 1988). Muhammad has not shown that the district court erred in granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
AFFIRMED.
DOT has previously decided not to enforce a regulation. But in prior cases, the decision not to 

enforce was grounded in the principle that “nobody is getting hurt” because of DOT inaction.

This time, however, consumers are being hurt by fees that are clearly unreasonable. Having to 

cancel and reschedule a trip already entails the financial penalty of paying higher fares for 

replacement bookings, in addition to whatever unexpected and stressful situation required 

cancellation of the trip. To add to consumers’ burden with outrageous change fees is clearly 

contrary to the public interest. DOT should act on this petition.

Ed Perkins

Retired Founding Editor, Consumer Reports Travel Letter
Exhibit


 Exhibit 10.7




TO:    PERFORMANCE SPORTS GROUP LTD. (the “Company”)
RE:    IRREVOCABLE ELECTION FOR DEFERRED SHARE UNIT PLAN


Reference is made to the Company’s Amended and Restated Directors’ Deferred Share Unit Plan dated as of October 14, 2014 (the “DSU Plan”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined have the meaning given to such terms in the DSU Plan.  You must complete the election below and return a signed copy to Amir Rosenthal, Chief Financial Officer, no later than                                  , 2015.  
The undersigned hereby irrevocably elects to receive _____% of his/her Directors’ Remuneration for the remainder of the Company’s current fiscal year (being all director fees (i.e, retainers, meeting fees) and other cash compensation payable for services as an independent contractor by the Company in respect of the services provided to the Company by the undersigned) in the form of Deferred Share Units. For US Participants, the deferral election will be effective only with respect to Director’s Remuneration payable in respect of services performed after the date the election form is received by the Company. The Company shall treat this election as an irrevocable election under section 2 of the DSU Plan as required from time to time by the DSU Plan. This election shall continue to apply for all subsequent fiscal years, unless and until changed or revoked in accordance with the provisions of the DSU Plan.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature page follows.]







 Exhibit 10.7




DATED at _______________ this ____ day of ____________, 2015.


	
			
	 
	 
	 

	Witness
	 
	Name:









[Performance Sports Group Ltd. – Irrevocable Election DSU Plan]
April 19, 2017

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | First Mining Finance Corp. (the
      Company)
|--- | ------------------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                      
|    | Consent of Expert                               
|    |                                                 

This letter is provided in connection with the Companys Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Annual
Report) to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC). The Annual Report incorporates by
reference the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2016.

I, Alan J. San Martin, MAusIMM(CP), of Micon International
Limited, hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with reference to my
involvement in the preparation of the following technical report:

A Mineral Resource Estimate For The
Pickle Crow Property, Patricia Mining Division, Northwestern Ontario, Canada,
dated June 2, 2011 (the Technical Report).

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

|/s/ Alan J. San Martin, MAusIMM(CP)
|-----------------------------------
|Alan J. San Martin, MAusIMM(CP)    
|Micon International Limited
Exhibit 10.1


 


CHARLES & COLVARD, LTD.


BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION PROGRAM


With Effect as of January 1, 2016


  


	
        Designated non-management members
of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Charles & Colvard, Ltd. (the “Company”) shall
be compensated as follows:

	 
	Annual Retainer:	$30,000 paid in four quarterly installments in arrears, pro-rated as applicable.
	 	 	 	 
	Additional Annual Retainers:	Executive Chairperson of the Board - $50,000 paid in four quarterly installments in arrears, pro-rated as applicable. The Executive Chairperson of the Board shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for service as a member or Chairperson of any Board Committee.
	 	 
	 	Chairperson of the Audit Committee - $15,000 paid in four quarterly installments in arrears, pro-rated as applicable.
	 	 
	 	Chairperson of Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee - $7,500 paid in four quarterly installments in arrears, pro-rated as applicable.
	 	 
	 	
        Board Committee Members (excluding Committee Chairperson) -
        $5,000 paid in four quarterly installments in arrears, pro-rated as applicable.

         

        Members of the Board may only receive retainers for serving
        as a member of two board committees.

	 	 	 	 
	Equity Compensation:	
        Stock option grant upon appointment as a member of the Board
        by the Board to fill a vacancy in the Board, with a grant date value to be determined by the Board as appropriate considering the
        time remaining before re-election at the next annual shareholders meeting.

         

        Stock option grant upon annual re-election as a director at
        the annual shareholders’ meeting with a grant date value of $50,000 for Directors and $55,000 for the Executive Chairperson
        (calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model).

         

        Vesting of the stock option awards described above shall be
        contingent upon service on the Board of Directors until the next annual shareholders’ meeting following the grant.

         

        The Executive Chairperson shall receive a stock option award
        upon appointment as the Executive Chairperson, with a grant date value to be determined by the Board as appropriate considering
        the time remaining in the fiscal year.

         

        The Executive Chairperson shall receive an additional stock
        option award annually on January 1 of each year with a grant date value of $50,000 (calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option
        pricing model).

         

        Vesting of the stock option awards granted to the Executive
        Chairperson (other than the award granted upon annual re-election as a director at the annual shareholders’ meeting) shall
        be contingent upon service on the Board of Directors until January 1st of the following year.

	 	 	 	 
	Attendance Participation Fee:	None.	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 


 


Adopted September 9, 2015 and effective as of January 1, 2016.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 269

Concerning consideration of United States military action against Haiti.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 19, 1994

Mr. GOSS (for himself, Mr. GOODLATTE, Ms. DUNN, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr.

LINDER, Mr. HORN, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr.

BACHUS of Alabama, Mr. THOMAS of Wyoming, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr.

SMITH of Texas, Mr. KYL, Mr. BAKER of California, Mr. HUTCHINSON,

Mr. CANADY, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. TALENT, Mr. WALKER, Mr. STEARNS,

Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. EWING, Mr. BURTON of

Indiana, Mrs. MEYERS of Kansas, Mr. STUMP, Mr. ROTH, Mr. HERGER,

Mr. LEWIS of Florida, Mr. WELDON, Mr. SCHAEFER, Mr. GRANDY, Mr.

LIVINGSTON, Mr. GILMAN, and Mr. SHAW) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign

Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning consideration of United States military action

against Haiti.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 United States should not undertake any military action

4 directed against Haiti unless the President first certifies

5 to the Congress that there exists a clear and present dan-
2

•HCON 269 IH

1 ger to the citizens of the United States and that United

2 States interests require such action.

Æ
# IMMC.EESC-2023-00995-AC.ENG.xhtml.EESC-2023-00995-00-00-AC-TRA-EN.docx

| OPINION |
| --- |
| European Economic and Social Committee |
| Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) |
| _____________ |
| Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE))


  [COM(2023 63 final – 2022/025 (COD)] |
| |
| NAT/897 |

OPINION

European Economic and Social Committee

Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE)

_____________

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE))

[COM(2023 63 final – 2022/025 (COD)]

NAT/897

EN

Referral

| Referral | European Parliament, 13/02/2023 |
| --- | --- |
| | Council, 21/02/2023 |
| Legal basis | Articles 192(1) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment |
| Adopted at plenary | 22/03/2023 |
| Plenary session No | 577 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 194/0/3 |

Referral

European Parliament, 13/02/2023

European Parliament, 13/02/2023

Council, 21/02/2023

Council, 21/02/2023

Legal basis

Legal basis

Articles 192(1) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Articles 192(1) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section responsible

Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment

Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment

Adopted at plenary

Adopted at plenary

22/03/2023

22/03/2023

Plenary session No

Plenary session No

577

577

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

194/0/3

194/0/3

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 5002/2014, adopted on 12 November 2014
  1
  , it decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text and to refer to the position it had taken in the above mentioned document.

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 5002/2014, adopted on 12 November 2014

1

, it decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text and to refer to the position it had taken in the above mentioned document.

Brussels, 22 March 2023

Brussels, 22 March 2023

Christa SCHWENG

Christa SCHWENG

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

_____________

_____________
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 4/25/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

FALASHA MANSA MUSA AMEN-RA, Petitioner-Appellant, vs. HERBERT R. TILLERY, Colonel; STEVEN SPATARO, Lt. Col., Assistant Commandant; JEFFERY L. NEWTON, Major; WILLIAM PALMER, Major and JOHN E. MILLER, Lt. General, Post Commander, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-3360 (D.C. No. 95-CV-3157) (D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before PORFILIO, McKAY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. **
Mr. Amen-Ra appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the Commandant of the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, to remove an unfavorable Observation Report from his records.- 2 -

Mr. Amen-Ra disputed the substance of the report, and was told by prison authorities that his administrative due process was limited to notice of the report and an opportunity to submit matters in rebuttal. I R. doc. 2, attach. C. So that he could exonerate himself, he contends that the matter should have been handled through a trial by court-martial or an appearance before a Discipline or Adjustment Board, rather than as an Incident Observation Report for minor infractions. We disagree and note that Mr. Amen-Ra has been accorded all process due under the circumstances and whether to prefer more severe charges lies in the discretion of the military prison authorities, not the district court. See Schulke v. United States , 544 F.2d 453, 455 (10th Cir. 1976) (per curiam). AFFIRMED. We GRANT Mr. Amen-Ra’s Motion for Leave to Proced on Appeal Without Prepayment of Costs or Fees. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3519 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to make the 

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection an independent agency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2013 

Mr. NEUGEBAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 

to make the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

an independent agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bureau of Consumer 

5 Financial Protection Accountability and Transparency Act 

6 of 2013’’. 

7 SEC. 2. MAKING THE BUREAU AN INDEPENDENT AGENCY. 

8 The Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) in section 1011— 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3519 IH

1 (A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘in the 

2 Federal Reserve System,’’; and 

3 (B) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘, includ4 ing in cities in which the Federal reserve banks, 

5 or branches of such banks, are located,’’; 

6 (2) in section 1012(c), by striking paragraphs 

7 (2), (3), (4), and (5); and 

8 (3) in section 1014(b), by striking ‘‘Not fewer 

9 than 6 members shall be appointed upon the rec10 ommendation of the regional Federal Reserve Bank 

11 Presidents, on a rotating basis.’’. 

12 SEC. 3. BRINGING THE BUREAU INTO THE REGULAR AP13 PROPRIATIONS PROCESS. 

14 Section 1017 of the Consumer Financial Protection 

15 Act of 2010 is amended— 

16 (1) in subsection (a)— 

17 (A) by amending the heading of such sub18 section to read as follows: ‘‘BUDGET, FINAN19 CIAL MANAGEMENT, AND AUDIT.—’’; 

20 (B) by striking paragraphs (1), (2), and 

21 (3); 

22 (C) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and 

23 (5) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively; and 

24 (D) by striking subparagraphs (E) and (F) 

25 of paragraph (1), as so redesignated; 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3519 IH

1 (2) by striking subsections (b) and (c); 

2 (3) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as 

3 subsections (b) and (c), respectively; and 

4 (4) in subsection (c), as so redesignated— 

5 (A) by striking paragraphs (1), (2), and 

6 (3) and inserting the following: 

7 ‘‘(1) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

8 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

9 as may be necessary to carry out this title for each 

10 of fiscal years 2014 and 2015.’’; and 

11 (B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as 

12 paragraph (2). 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal C 272/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 272 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6317 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 272

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6317 August 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COURT OF AUDITORS |
| 2020/C 272/01 | Opinion No 4/2020 (pursuant to Articles 287(4) and 322(1)(a), TFEU) concerning the proposal 2020/0101 (COD) for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards exceptional additional resources and implementing arrangements under the Investment for growth and jobs goal to provide assistance for fostering crisis repair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and preparing a green, digital and resilient recovery of the economy (REACT-EU); and on the amended proposal 2018/0196 (COD) for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument | 1 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COURT OF AUDITORS

2020/C 272/01

Opinion No 4/2020 (pursuant to Articles 287(4) and 322(1)(a), TFEU) concerning the proposal 2020/0101 (COD) for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards exceptional additional resources and implementing arrangements under the Investment for growth and jobs goal to provide assistance for fostering crisis repair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and preparing a green, digital and resilient recovery of the economy (REACT-EU); and on the amended proposal 2018/0196 (COD) for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument

(pursuant to Articles 287(4) and 322(1)(a), TFEU)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# (U**M(cJ-tk^ p^T,** **ra**

# of-ike.**id a;£** 

# 7*2.**2-01*0****c.**

# ktve>c*pfan\e***rvi cn** **.■: "":** **...**

# ey

# 771*^2,**7&*j****fo to** ***-/r ue.** ***>**

# .-fo/jt
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

MARIA ROSARIO POWDRILL,

Plaintiff, 

v. No. 4:22-cv-0670-P

RACETRAC PETROLEUM,

Defendant.

FINAL JUDGMENT

This Final Judgment is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 58. Per the Order entered on August 22, 2022: 

It is ORDERED, ADJUGED, and DECREED that this civil action 

is DISMISSED without prejudice.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to transmit a true copy of this Final 

Judgment to the Parties.

SO ORDERED on this 22nd day of August 2022.

Mark T. Pittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00670-P Document 7 Filed 08/22/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 52