T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t, a n dth e r e f o r e d e n ie s W e lls ’s r e q u e s t f o ro r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T LO RRA I N E A LTH EA W ELLS, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. F R A N K L IN A P A R T M E N T S , T enant s; et a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 57031 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 5 9 5 8 - R- SH ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M a nue l L . R e a l , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry16, 2010 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 

# FI LED MA R 09 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSL SS/ Res ea r ch 08- 57031 2 L o rr a in e A lth e aW e lls ap p e a ls p r o s e f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t in h er act i o n al l eg i n g v ari o u s cl ai m s ag ai n stth e F ran k l i n A p artm en t s an d / o r t en an t s, the C i tyof

S a nt aM oni c a , a nd W e s t s i de R e gi ona l C e nt e r . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on pu rs uantt o 2 8 U . S . C . § 1 29 1. W e r evi ew de no vo bo th the exi st ence of subj ec t m a tte rju r is d ic tio n , P e ral ta v . His pani c B us . , I

nc . , 41 9 F . 3d 10 64 , 10 68 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 5 ) , a n dag r a n t o f

s u m m a ryju d g m e n t, T

oguc hiv . Chung , 391 F . 3d 1051, 1056 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e a f

f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d W e l l s ’ s c l a i m s a ga i ns tthe C i tyof S a nt aM oni c af

orl a c k of

s ubj e c tm a tt e rj ur i s di c t i on be c aus e he rc om pl a i ntdoe s not a lle g e f a c ts to s up p o rt f

e d e r a l q u e s tio n o rd iv e r s ityju r is d ic tio n a g a in s t th e C ity . See P e r a lta , 4 1 9 F .3 da t 1 0 6 8 ( “I n c iv il c a s e s , s u b je c t m a tte rju r is d ic tio n is g e n e r a llyc o n f

e rr e dup o n f

e d e r a l d is tr ic t c o u rts e ith e rth r o u g h d iv e r s ity j u r i s d i c t i o n , 2 8 U . S. C. § 1 3 3 2 , o rf e d e r a l q u e s t i o n j u r i s d i c t i o n , 2 8 U . S. C. § 1 3 3 1 .” ) ; s e e al

s o V ade n v . D is c ov e rB ank , 129 S . C t . 1262, 1272 ( 2009) (e xp l ai ni ng thatse ct i on 13 31 confers j uri sdi ct i on ov erci vi l ac t i on s “ ar i si ng un der” fe d er al law an dth at an ac ti o n “arise s u n d er ” f ed er al law o n ly w h er e th e p lain ti ff’s st at em entof the cl ai m show s thatthe cl ai m i s bas ed on fe dera l l aw ). T o th e e x te n t th a t W e lls h a s a lle g e dan yc au s e s o f a c tio n a g a in s t F r a n k lin A pa rtm e nt s , the di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l yde t e rm i ne d tha tthe yw e r e f or e c l os e d byL SS/ Res ea r ch 08- 57031 3 W e lls ’s p r io rs e ttle m e n t a g r e e m e n t w ith th e o w n e r s . See M arder v . L op ez , 450 F .3 d4 4 5 , 4 4 9 - 5 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) ( d is c u s s in g r e le a s e o f c la im s u n d e rC a lif

o rn ia la w ) . T o th e e x te n t th a t W e lls h a s a lle g e da n yc au s e s o f a c tio n a g a in s t th e te n a n ts of F rank l i n A partm ent s, she f ai l ed t o n am e tho se i nd i vi du al s and t o serve them w i th the s um m ons a nd c om pl a i nt , s o the yw e r e ne ve rpr ope r l ym a de pa rt i e s t o the a c tio n . See F e d. R . C i v. P . 4. W el l s’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.