alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As
adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Audax Credit
BDC Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard T. Joseph, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and



(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|/s/ Richard T. Joseph |                        
|--------------------- | -----------------------
|Name:                 | Richard T. Joseph      
|Title:                | Chief Financial Officer



Date: March 17, 2020
Exhibit 35.1



AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB



I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby
certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the
“Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and
“Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of May 20, 2015 among the
Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2015-2 Owner Trust, as follows:



| | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2017, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
this 22nd day of May, 2017.



| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
Case 3:22-cr-00145-M Document 350 Filed 11/01/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 918
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 187

To designate the week of May 23, 1993, through May 29, 1993, as

‘‘International Student Awareness Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1993

Mr. HANSEN (for himself and Mr. ORTON) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil

Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the week of May 23, 1993, through May 29,

1993, as ‘‘International Student Awareness Week’’.

Whereas international student exchange programs provide

students with an enriched and improved quality of life

through first-hand experience with different cultures;

Whereas international student exchange programs provide

fertile training ground for future world leaders;

Whereas international student exchange programs make enormous strides toward world peace through understanding;
2

•HJ 187 IH

Whereas international student exchange programs enrich a

student’s understanding of the United States and its

communities; and

Whereas the United States recognizes the need for an increased awareness of such valuable programs: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week of May 23, 1993, through May 29, 1993,

4 is designated as ‘‘International Student Awareness

5 Week’’. The President is authorized and requested to issue

6 a proclamation calling upon the people of the United

7 States to observe the week with appropriate ceremonies

8 and activities.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jounce Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of her or his knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 10, 2017


By:/s/ RICHARD MURRAYRichard Murray, Ph.D.President, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorBy:/s/ KIM C. DRAPKINKim C. DrapkinTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### CLARK v. BROWN et al.

No. 12172.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Nov. 15, 1950.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 13, 1950.

Roscoe Johnson, San Antonio, for appellant.

Leonard Brown, Jr., Archie S. Brown, San Antonio, John M. Harrod, Eden, for appellees.

W. O. MURRAY, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by Vird Clark against Johnnie Webb Smith Brown, her husband, Richard Brown, and her daughter, Robbie Mae Hardeman, seeking to recover on a note or contract in the sum of $330.00, together with the title and possession of certain personal property used in connection with a cafe business located at 102 Vargas Street, San Antonio, Texas.

The trial was to the court without the intervention of a jury and resulted in judgment in favor of plaintiff, Clark, for the sum of $330.00, but a recovery of the personal property was denied, from which judgment Vird Clark has prosecuted this appeal.

Appellant contends that he should have been granted a new trial herein because after his only witness, B. J. Thomas, had been sworn in and placed under the rule he was threatened by Johnnie Webb Smith Brown and Robbie Mae Hardeman and told that if he testified for Clark she, Johnnie Brown, would cut his throat and that if she didn’t her husband, Richard Brown, would do so, whereupon the witness, B. J. Thomas, left the court house and was not seen by appellant or his attorney until several days later. During the trial appellant and his attorney discovered that witness Thomas was gone but did not know why he had left. It was not until several days later that they learned why he had left.

The above facts do not entitle appellant to a new trial. When appellant discovered during the trial that the witness Thomas had absented himself from the court house without permission, it was his duty to then and there make such fact known to the court, and if he regarded the testimony of such witness material to his cause of action he should have requested the court to issue an attachment for the arrest of the witness and further ask the court to postpone the hearing or to continue the case until the witness could be located. He could not keep the absence of the wit*1014ness a secret and proceed with the trial, and after judgment went against him raise the question for the first time.

Furthermore, appellant does not show in his motion for a new trial, or by affidavits attached to it, or by evidence, or in any way, what facts he expected to establish by the witness Thomas. The trial court and this Court has a right to know what facts the witness would testify to, so that the materiality of such testimony could be passed upon.

Under such circumstances, the trial court properly overruled appellant’s motion for a new trial and we find no error in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.
OCTOBER TERM, 1732.

Lib. W. G. No. 3. fol. 82.

#### The Lord Proprietary *against*Garret King.

THIS was an indictment for murder, found before the Justices of Assise appointed to hold a Court of *Oyer*and *Terminer*and Gaol Delivery, for *Baltimore*County, in September, 1732. Verdict, Guilty of murder.

The prosecutor, at the trial, to prove that the said *King*was guilty of the charge in the indictment, produced before the Judges several witnesses, whose depositions are set forth in the bill of exceptions.

Whereupon *Edward*Jenings, counsel on behalf of the prisoner, did insist and interpose, that the evidence did not maintain and prove the malice and aforethought laid in the indictment, and desired the Jury to find the prisoner guilty of manslaughter only; and desired the Judges that they would inform the Jury, that the evidence did not maintain the premises, and the malice aforethought; and the said Justices did not inform the Jury, that the evidence was insufficient in law to maintain and prove the premises aforesaid, and the malice aforethought, but left the same at large to the Jury.

The prisoner’s counsel took a bill of exceptions.(a)

The proceedings being transmitted to the Provincial Court, that Court adjudged, that the said *Garret King*was guilty only of manslaughter, and that he be burnt in the hand, &c.

(a)

 By the act establishing Assise Courts, in force when this case was tried, it was provided, that in criminal cases, where the party accused desired it, the Justices should sign and allow bills of exceptions, in the same manner as they were usually allowed in civil cases.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 205 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 205

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 27 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Designating the week beginning October 31, 1993, as ``National Health 
                     Information Management Week''.

Whereas accurate, timely, and complete medical records and related health 
        information are vital in planning and providing for quality health care 
        for the people of the United States;
Whereas such records and information are vital to providing health care to an 
        individual beginning at the birth of the individual and continuing 
        throughout the life of the individual;
Whereas public concern about the quality, appropriateness, and effectiveness of 
        health care is escalating;
Whereas specific skills in evaluating and reporting the results of health care 
        are required to provide public accountability;
Whereas equitable third-party reimbursement for health care is dependent on 
        health information that is collected, analyzed, classified, verified, 
        and disseminated;
Whereas public awareness of patient rights, including the right of a patient to 
        access the patient's own medical information, is increasing;
Whereas the needs and requirements for health information of the health care 
        industry and the use of the information by the industry are changing 
        rapidly;
Whereas the rate of such changes will continue to increase as new health care 
        technology is used and new health care reform policies are promulgated;
Whereas the 35,000 members of the American Health Information Management 
        Association are the health information leaders of the United States; and
Whereas such members have demonstrated commitment to, and expertise in, health 
        information management: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week beginning 
October 31, 1993, is designated as ``National Health Information 
Management Week'', and the President is authorized and requested to 
issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United States to 
observe the week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 26, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Manufacturers’ Services Limited (the“Company”) for the period ended September 28, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,Robert C. Bradshaw, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Albert A.Notini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;an

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|                     | /s/ Robert  C. Bradshaw  |   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
| Dated:  October 31, 2003 | Robert C.  Bradshaw      |
|                     | Chief  Executive Officer |
|                     |                     |
|                     |                     |
|                     | /s/ Albert  A. Notini    |   |
| Dated:  October 31, 2003 | Albert A.  Notini        |
|                     | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
#### HAYTON v. STATE.

No. 26377.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 15, 1953.

No attorney on appeal.

■ Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50.

The statement of facts is approved by appellant’s counsel only. This is not sufficient. Article 759a, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P.

If the instrument appearing in the record signed by the trial judge and the county attorney may be considered as an approval of the statement of facts, such ap-prov.al was long after the 90 days allowed for filing the statement of facts and cannot be considered. .

No formal bills of exception appear in the record.

The proceedings appearing regular, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Macatawa Bank Corporation (the "Company") that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the accounting period ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

|Dated: March 29, 2010 | /s/ Ronald L. Haan                                            
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | Ronald L. Haan
Chief Executive Officer                        
|                      |                                                               
|                      |                                                               
|                      |                                                               
|Dated: March 29, 2010 | /s/ Jon W. Swets                                              
|                      | Jon W. Swets
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Case 4:22-cr-00170-O Document 35 Filed 07/20/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 166
Case 4:22-cr-00170-O Document 35 Filed 07/20/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 167
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28927]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-347-020]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

November 6, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 31, 2000, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern) tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be 
effective December 1, 2000:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 263H
Third Revised Sheet No. 263H.1
Alternate Fourth Revised Sheet No. 263H
Alternate Third Revised Sheet No. 263H.1

    Northern states that Tariff Sheet Nos. 263H and 263H.1 reflect the 
Sourcers' flow obligation after the Appendix B customers' election to 
source or buyout based on the 2000 Carlton Settlement pending before 
the Commission as well as Northern's current tariff.
    Northern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Northern's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
    Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet 
in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions 
on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28927 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         331,587
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  767,877
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (49,940)
<INVENTORY>                                     26,828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,149,008
<PP&E>                                       2,247,930
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,176,383)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,237,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,600,317
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,324
<OTHER-SE>                                     543,063
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,237,303
<SALES>                                      1,242,849
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,242,849
<CGS>                                          785,435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,424,756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (14,512)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (196,419)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (196,419)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (196,419)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Care Capital Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond J. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: March 17,   2017 |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
|                        |   |
| /s/ Raymond J.   Lewis |   |
| Raymond J. Lewis            |   |
| *Chief Executive Officer*   |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Order entered December 14, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00716-CR

JOHN PAUL CRUMLEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-82474-2022

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 12, 2022 second motion for 

extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER

appellant’s brief filed by January 11, 2023. If appellant fails to file his brief by 

January 11, 2023, the Court may abate this case for a hearing in the trial court to 

determine why the brief has not been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b).

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE