alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 11.1  Statement Re: Computation of Per-Share Earnings       EXHIBIT 11.1


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Three Months Ended September 30
                                                               -------------------------------
                                                                   1997               1996
                                                                   ----               ----
<S>                                                           <C>                  <C>        
   Primary
       Average common shares outstanding                         9,234,828           9,123,096
       Net effect of dilutive options and warrants-
          based on treasury stock method (or modified
          treasury method if applicable) using average
          market price                                                  --             860,281
                                                              ------------         -----------
                                                                 9,234,828           9,983,377
                                                              ------------         -----------
       Net Income (loss)                                      $ (8,946,142)        $ 1,290,625
                                                              ------------         -----------
       Per Share amount                                       $      (0.97)        $      0.13
                                                              ------------         -----------
   Fully Diluted
       Average common shares outstanding                         9,234,828           9,123,096
       Net effect of dilutive options and warrants-
          based on treasury stock method (or modified
          treasury method if applicable) using
          year-end market price                                         --             884,305
                                                              ------------         -----------
                                                                 9,234,828          10,007,401
                                                              ------------         -----------
       Net (Loss) Income                                      $ (8,946,142)        $ 1,290,625
                                                              ------------         -----------
       Per Share amount                                       $      (0.97)        $      0.13
                                                              ------------         -----------
</TABLE>

                                       25
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00101-L

§

TROY WRIGHT §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent 

of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, 

and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the 

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the 

Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and 

TROY WRIGHT is hereby adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C), namely, Possession With the Intent to 

Distribute and the Distribution of a Mixture and Substance Containing a Detectable Amount of Fentanyl, a Schedule II 

Controlled Substance. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

☒ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court accepts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence that the 

defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released and should therefore 

be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions 

of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the defendant is likely to flee or pose a 

danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of whether it has 

been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be 

detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is 

not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This 

matter shall be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

SIGNED this 1st day of July, 2022.

________________________________________

SAM A. LINDSAY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00101-L Document 30 Filed 07/01/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 55
ex1018.htm










 


LOAN AGREEMENT


 


July 7, 2015







City Group LLC (the “Lender”) of 1201 Orange Street, Suite 600, Wilmington, DE 19801, advanced total of USD$25,000 (the “Principal Sum”) to Cell MedX Corp. (the “Borrower”) of 4575 Dean Martin Drive, STE 2206, Las Vegas, NV 89103.  The Lender advanced the funds on July 7, 2015.


 


The Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of six (6) per cent per year (the “Interest”) from July 7, 2015.  The Borrower is liable for repayment for the Principal Sum and accrued Interest and any costs that the Lender incurs in trying to collect the Principal Sum and the Interest.


 


The Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum and the Interest with a promissory note in the attached form.


 


LENDER                                                                          BORROWER


City Group LLC                                                                    Cell MedX Corp.

















/s/  Tom Sharp                                                                      /s/ Yanika Silina


By: Tom Sharp, Director                                                     By: Yanika Silina, CFO
















  





1











  








PROMISSORY NOTE







Principal Amount:  USD$25,000                                                                                                          July 7, 2015












For value received Cell MedX Corp., (the “Borrower”) promises to pay on demand to the order of City Group LLC (the “Lender”) the sum of $25,000 lawful money of United States of America (the “Principal Sum”) together with interest on the Principal Sum from July 7, 2015 (“Effective Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate as defined below.







For the purpose of this promissory note, Interest Rate means six (6) per cent per year.  Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective rate of 6.17% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.







The Borrower may repay the Principal Sum and the Interest in whole or in part at any time.







The Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour of this promissory note.




 


BORROWER


Cell MedX Corp.












/s/ Yanika Silina


By: Yanika Silina, CFO








  





2
# Official Journal L 25/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2014.025.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 25 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5728 January 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2014.025.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 25

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5728 January 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 44/2014 of 21 November 2013 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the vehicle construction and general requirements for the approval of two- or three-wheel vehicles and quadricycles (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 44/2014 of 21 November 2013 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the vehicle construction and general requirements for the approval of two- or three-wheel vehicles and quadricycles (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Case 3:22-cr-00228-L Document 22 Filed 12/01/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID 71
Case 3:22-cr-00228-L Document 22 Filed 12/01/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID 72
Case 3:22-cr-00228-L Document 22 Filed 12/01/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID 73
30 November

Case 3:22-cr-00228-L Document 22 Filed 12/01/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID 74
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code), the undersigned officer of NeoPharm, Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report ofthe Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “10-Q Report”) that:

 

(1)                                  the 10-Q Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the informationcontained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  May 10, 2004 | /s/ Lawrence A. Kenyon  |   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                      | Lawrence A. Kenyon,     |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 2033** 

TIMOTHY WILLIAMS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
FORCE PROTECTION INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED; HOWARD EISENHUT, individually and as an employee of Force Protection Industri es Incorporated; SHELIA BOYD, individually and as an employee of Force Protection Industries Incorporated; VANESSA LADSON, individually and as an employee of Force Protection Industries Incorporated; HELEN GEARHEARD, individually and as an employee of Forc e Protection Industries Incorporated; BRENDA VALENTINE, individually and as an employee of Force Protection Industries Incorporated , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charles ton

. Margaret B. Seymour , District Judge. ( 2:07

- cv - 0 3679

- MBS )

Submitted : April 7, 2010 Decided: April 23, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Timothy Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael D. Carrout h, FISHER & PHILLIPS, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Timothy Williams appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of th e magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action alleging employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, as amended , and raising related claims under state
law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Williams v. Force Protection Industries Inc. , No. 2:07

-

cv - 0 3679

- MBS (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2009) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00047-Z-BR

§

VINCENTE ANTHONY BIANCO (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

VINCENTE ANTHONY BIANCO (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th 

Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 2 of the 

Indictment. After cautioning and examining VINCENTE ANTHONY BIANCO (1) under oath concerning each of the 

subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense 

charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore 

recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that VINCENTE ANTHONY BIANCO (1) be adjudged guilty of 21 

U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C) - POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE METHAMPHETAMINE and 

have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: September 6, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00047-Z-BR Document 31 Filed 09/06/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 74
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DANIEL ROMANOWSKI, §

Plaintiff, §

v. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-0428-E-BH

§

TRANS UNION, LLC, et al., §

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections 

thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion 

that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the 

Findings and Conclusions of the Court. 

Defendant Wells Fargo Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed October 14, 2022

(doc. 62), is GRANTED in part on the Fair Credit Reporting Act and defamation claims, and 

summary judgment is sua sponte GRANTED in favor of Wells Fargo Bank on the Fair Credit 

Billing Act claim. By separate judgment, the plaintiff’s claims against Wells Fargo Bank will be 

DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED: September 7, 2023.

Case 3:22-cv-00428-E-BH Document 100 Filed 09/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 463
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

CHARLES EDWARD SCOTT, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00675-O-BP

 §

CITY OF FORT WORTH, et al., § 

 §

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for 

review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the case without prejudice

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

SO ORDERED on this 16th day of September, 2022.

Case 4:22-cv-00675-O Document 10 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 38
#### SMALLWOOD v. STATE.

No. 21346.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 8, 1941.

Marvin P. McCoy, of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of an assault to murder with malice, aforethought, and his punishment assessed at five years in the penitentiary.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. The indictment appears to be in proper form. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Department of the Treasury

Office of Public Affairs

Press Release: December 17, 2021

Contact: Treasury Public Affairs, press@treasury.gov

READOUT: Financial Stability Oversight Council Meeting on 

December 17, 2021

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen convened a meeting of 

the Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) in executive and open sessions by 

videoconference. 

During the executive session, the Council received an update from Chair Gensler of the 

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on forthcoming proposed SEC rulemakings. 

The Council also received a presentation from staff of the Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency (OCC), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve) on their Crypto-Asset Policy Sprint Initiative.

Additionally, the Council received an update from Treasury staff on ongoing work on climaterelated financial risks. 

During the open session, the Council received a presentation on the Council’s 2021 annual report 

and voted unanimously to approve the report. 

The Council also voted unanimously to approve the charter establishing a staff-level Climaterelated Financial Risk Committee. The committee will be a venue for the staffs of Council 

members and member agencies to collaborate and share information regarding potential climaterelated risks. 

Additionally, the Council received an update from staff of the Federal Reserve on the transition 

from LIBOR, including the cessation of new U.S. dollar LIBOR transactions after December 31, 

2021. 

The Council also voted to approve the minutes of its previous meeting on November 15, 2021. 
In attendance at the Council meeting by videoconference were the following members: 

• Janet L. Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury (Chairperson of the Council)

• Jerome H. Powell, Chair, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

• Michael J. Hsu, Acting Comptroller of the Currency

• Rohit Chopra, Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

• Gary Gensler, Chair, Securities and Exchange Commission

• Jelena McWilliams, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

• Rostin Behnam, Acting Chairman, Commodity Futures Trading Commission

• Sandra L. Thompson, Acting Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency

• Todd M. Harper, Chairman, National Credit Union Administration

• Thomas Workman, Independent Member with Insurance Expertise

• Dino Falaschetti, Director, Office of Financial Research (non-voting member)

• Steven Seitz, Director, Federal Insurance Office (non-voting member)

• Melanie Lubin, Securities Commissioner, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, 

Securities Division (non-voting member)

Additional information regarding the Council, its work, and the recently approved annual report, 

Climate-related Financial Risk Committee charter, and meeting minutes is available at 

http://www.fsoc.gov.

####
Case 3:22-cv-03256-C-BK Document 14 Filed 10/24/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 49