alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TINSLEY et al. v. YOUNG et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 5, 1953.

Russell Vanover, Pikeville, R. R. Hatfield, McCarr, for appellants,

Francis M. Burke, Pikeville, for appel-lees.

CAMMACK, Justice.

Belle Young Tinsley and her son, Autie Young, are appealing from a judgment holding that Hiram Young, the husband of Belle Young Tinsley, died intestate, without children, in 1932, the owner of a five acre tract of land on which was located a dwelling, together with some outbuildings. The action was instituted by some of the appellees, heirs of Hiram Young, seeking a sale of the property and a division of the proceeds. The judgment directed that the land be sold and the proceeds divided among the appellees. Mrs. Tinsley was allowed dower, based on her age of 69 at the time of the entry of the judgment, because she had received the rents and income from the property since the death of Hiram Young.

Autie Young was the son of Belle Young Tinsley by a former marriage. It is not disclosed how he acquired the name “Young”. Apparently, the only reason for his appearing as a party in the case is that he claims to' have made some improvements on the property after Hiram Young’s death. There is proof for the appellees that Hiram Young acquired the property from Greely Hatfield, in 1909, for $2750.' On the other hand, Mrs. Tinsley claims that she furnished the money for the original purchase. She claimed also that Hiram Young deeded her the property in 1932 for a consideration of $50. That deed was not acknowledged. There is the contention also that the appellants placed permanent improvements on the property with the full knowledge of the appellees. According to the appellants’ proof, Hiram Young suffered with tuberculosis for a number of years prior to his death and was unable to work.

The judgment from which the appeal is prosecuted was .entered in 1950 by J. Frank Stewart, Special Judge. The action was instituted during Judge R. Monroe Fields’ lifetime. There is proof that the case was submitted for judgment by Judge Fields in February, 1947, that the submission was set aside for further preparation in March of that year, and that Judge Fields submitted the case for final judgment in September, 1947. However, he never entered a judgment in the case. Judge E. D. Stephenson considered the case, and there is a notation made by him that the case was submitted for judgment in April, 1950, that he wanted *902to hear counsel, and that judgment was to go for the defendants (appellants). Judge Stephenson did not enter a judgment in the case because he became critically ill and it was during his illness that the special judge was designated to try the case.

We have examined the record carefully and are not disposed to disturb Judge Stewart’s ruling, because we think there was ample evidence to support it.

Judgment affirmed.
#### Jeff B. TALBERT, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 23005.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 20, 1944.

John D. Glass, of Tyler, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Since the appeal was perfected in this case, appellant has died.

The appeal is therefore abated.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Ajopeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
JENNIFER VANDERSTOK, et al.

MERRICK GARLAND, et al.

4:22-cv-691

Ashcroft Law Firm, LLC

200 State Street, 7th Floor

Boston MA 02109

617-573-9400 617-933-7607

Nathan P. Brennan

Movant, Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 92 Filed 10/04/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 1172
Minnesota

 0389954 October 30, 2009

N/A N/A N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 92 Filed 10/04/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 1173
N/A N/A

Brian D. Poe

909 Throckmorton Street

Fort Worth TX 76102

817-870-2022 817-977-6501

4th October 2022

Nathan P. Brennan

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 92 Filed 10/04/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 1174
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 17 November 2005

in Case C-378/04: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Risks related to exposure to carcinogens and mutagens - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2006/C 36/27)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-378/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: D. Martin and V. Kreuschitz) v Republic of Austria (Agent: C. Pesendorfer) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to comply with obligations, brought on 2 September 2004 — the Court, composed of A. Borg Barthet (Rapporteur) acting as President of the Sixth Chamber, U. Lõhmus and A. Ó Caoimh, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 17 November 2005, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 262 of 23.10.2004

----
Case 4:22-cr-00035-Y Document 42 Filed 02/09/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 52
Case 4:22-cr-00035-Y Document 42 Filed 02/09/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 53
Case 4:22-cr-00035-Y Document 42 Filed 02/09/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 54
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

                                     BY THE
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of LION, Inc., a Washington
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of
Randall D. Miles, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve Thomson, Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350), that to his knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


/s/ Randall D. Miles                      /s/ Steve Thomson
------------------------------------      ------------------------------------
Randall D. Miles                          Steve Thomson

August 16, 2004                           August 16, 2004
------------------------------------      ------------------------------------

                                       1
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Michigan Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Michigan Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 7,500  | 7,500  | 7,500  | 7,500  | 8,200  | 8,200  | 8,200  | 8,800 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 9,200  | 9,200  | 10,200 | 10,200 | 10,400 | 10,400 | NA     | 9,500  | NA     | 9,400 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4,000  | 4,100  | 4,100  | 4,100  | 4,100  | 4,500  | 5,100  | 4,900  | 5,000  | 5,000 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5,000  | 5,000  | 5,000  | 6,000  | 6,500  | 7,000  | 7,000  | 7,000  | 7,000  | 7,500 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7,500  | 7,500  | 8,000  | 8,000  | 8,500  |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Plaintiff

Defendant

v.

Civil Action No.

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

(This form also satisfies Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1)

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and LR 3.1(c), LR 3.2(e), LR 7.4, LR 81.1(a)(4)(D), and LR 81.2,

provides the following information:

For a nongovernmental corporate party, the name(s) of its parent corporation and any 

publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its stock (if none, state "None"): 

*Please separate names with a comma. Only text visible within box will print.

A complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, 

guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporations, or other legal entities that are 

financially interested in the outcome of the case: 

*Please separate names with a comma. Only text visible within box will print.

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 124 Filed 11/10/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1669
Date:

Signature:

Print Name:

Telephone:

Address:

City, State, Zip:

Bar Number:

Fax:

E-Mail:

NOTE: To electronically file this document, you will find the event in our Case Management (CM/ECF) system, under Civil => Other 

Documents => Certificate of Interested Persons/Disclosure Statement.

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 124 Filed 11/10/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1670
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 178 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 178

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the House from Wednesday, November 10, 
1993, to Monday, November 15, 1993, and an adjournment or recess of the 
Senate from Wednesday, November 10, 1993, to Tuesday, November 16, 1993

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 178

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on Wednesday, November 10, 1993, it stand 
adjourned until noon on Monday, November 15, 1993, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when 
the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Wednesday, 
November 10, 1993, pursuant to a motion made by the majority leader or 
his designee, in accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until noon on Tuesday, November 16, 1993, or at such time as 
may be specified by the majority leader or his designee in the motion 
to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the minority leader of 
the House and the minority leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
```
Case 6:22-cr-00005-P-BU Document 25 Filed 03/08/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 50
Case 6:22-cr-00005-P-BU Document 25 Filed 03/08/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 51
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gary Moore, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), rendered February 8, 1989, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight and appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for our review or without merit. Kooper, J. P., Fiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 162

To designate July 5, 1993, through July 12, 1993, as ‘‘National Awareness

Week for Life-Saving Techniques’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1993

Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself and Mr. ROWLAND) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil

Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate July 5, 1993, through July 12, 1993, as

‘‘National Awareness Week for Life-Saving Techniques’’.

Whereas the National Safety Council reported that over

800,000 Americans died in 1991 as a result of accidents

and diseases of the heart;

Whereas accidents are the leading cause of death for children

and youth ages 1 to 24 years;

Whereas drowning and choking are a leading cause of accidental death in children under the age of 5 years;

Whereas rescue breathing and cardiopulmonary resuscitation,

commonly referred to as CPR, are life-saving techniques
2

HJ 162 IH

that significantly reduce the incidence of sudden death

due to accidents and diseases of the heart;

Whereas it is critical that more Americans learn such basic

life-saving techniques in order to reduce the number of

deaths related to accidents and diseases of the heart;

Whereas the opportunity to learn basic life-saving techniques

is available to all Americans through the American Red

Cross, the American Heart Association, the YMCA, and

other national organizations; and

Whereas the death rate due to accidents and diseases of the

heart would be greatly reduced if more Americans received training in basic life-saving techniques: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That July 5, 1993, through July 12, 1993, is designated

4 as ‘‘National Awareness Week for Life-Saving Tech5 niques’’. The President is authorized and requested to

6 issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United

7 States to observe the week with appropriate ceremonies

8 and activities designed to encourage training in life-saving

9 techniques for Americans.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 4:21-MJ-841

 §

JOSEPH MICHAEL DUPREE §

NOTICE OF DESIGNATION OF CASE ASSIGNMENT

Pursuant to Miscellaneous Order No. 3 (Revised June 20, 2000) (“Criminal Justice Act Plan”), 

§ IV(b), the undersigned attorney has indicated by his or her signature that he or she is the staff attorney 

designated to work on this case.

Dated: 01/28/2022 BY: /s/ George H. Lancaster, Jr. 

GEORGE H. LANCASTER, JR.

Assistant Federal Public Defender

West Virginia State Bar No. 5665

819 Taylor Street, Room 9A10

Fort Worth, Texas 76102

(817) 978-2753 (TEL)

(817) 978-2757 (FAX)

George_Lancaster@fd.org

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, George H. Lancaster, Jr., hereby certify that on this the 28TH day of January 2022, I 

electronically filed this document with the Clerk of the United States District Court, Northern 

District of Texas, using the Court’s electronic filing system. This system sent a “Notice of 

Electronic Filing” to the United States Attorney.

_/s/ George H. Lancaster, Jr.

GEORGE H. LANCASTER, JR.

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Case 4:22-cr-00036-Y Document 9 Filed 01/28/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 10
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-30416

Summary Calendar

 

WILBURN L. DOVE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CV-1545

__________________________________________

March 9, 1999

Before POLITZ, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Wilburn L. Dove appeals from the judgment affirming the denial of his application for Social

Security disability insurance benefits. Dove argues that the administrative determination that he can

perform the full range of light work is not supported by substantial evidence. Dove did not raise his

contention before the Appeals Council; therefore, he did not exhaust 

administrative remedies as to this issue. We find no reason to waive the exhaustion requirement in

Dove’s case. Consequently, we lack jurisdiction over Dove’s appeal. Paul v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 208,

210 (5th Cir. 1994);see Giannakos v. M/V BRAVO TRADER, 762 F.2d 1295, 1297 (5thCir. 1985)

(court must observe lack of subject-matter jurisdiction sua sponte). 
2

 APPEAL DISMISSED.
"Carl Grolle" 

<cgrolle@goldenrefrigerant.co

m>

09/06/2011 12:43 PM

To Group A-AND-R-DOCKET@EPA

cc

bcc

Subject E-Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1040

Air and Radiation Docket

Docket Number:  EPA‐HQ‐OAR‐2010‐1040

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 6102T

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC  20460

Dear Sir/Madame:

As a EPA Certified Reclaimer, Golden Refrigerant welcomes this opportunity to comment on the interim

final rule recently published.  

We believe that the EPA should review the current state of the HCFC market before issuing allocations

for 2012 and beyond. The amount of HCFC’s, and more specifically HCFC‐22, available in the

marketplace is in excess of what is required for servicing existing units. This oversupply is causing the

price of HCFC‐22 to fall and also leading to a general lack of concern by the mechanical industry about

the need for increased recovery and reclamation of this material.

We also ask that in future allocations, a fair and significant portion of the allocation be distributed to the

reclamation industry. This allocation could be used by the reclamation industry to increase the overall

amount of reclaimable HCFC’s and reduce the need for further manufacturing of these substances. The

mechanics of the benefit of a portion of the allocation to the reclaim community has previously been

submitted to the EPA.

Respectfully,

Carl Grolle

Golden Refrigerant

cgrolle@goldenrefrigerant.com

(734) 793‐1400 x5

(734) 793‐1401 fax
#### Errol Flynn, Plaintiff, *v.*Confidential, Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

December 27, 1957.

*Becker, Ross & Stone*for defendant.

*Goldstein, Golenback & Barell*for plaintiff.

Irving H. Saypol, J.

Motion by the defendant to vacate or modify the plaintiff’s demand for a bill of particulars of the defendant’s affirmative defenses, entire and partial, is granted to the extent of striking items 1 and *2*and it is otherwise denied.

The action is in libel based on the admitted article of the plaintiff published in the March, 1955 issue of the defendant’s magazine. True, it is only under unusual circumstances that the court permits an order compelling the giving of names and witnesses in advance of trial *(Goakes*v. *City of Oneida,*180 App. Div. 118, 119-120). But in special circumstances, distinguishable from the logic of withholding names in the negligence case in *Goakes (sufra)*where the defenses plead the truth, it may be argued with logic too that corruption of witnesses or their substitution should be avoided by directing their identification before the trial. The admission of the publication and its application to the plaintiff of the defamatory matter creates the presumption of its falsity to be overcome by the defendant on its defenses of justification *(Cromwell*v. *Norton,*235 App. Div. 546, 547). The call girl with whom the plaintiff was said by the defendant to have spent his wedding night and the witnesses to the lewd and obscene performances which the plaintiff assertedly staged and *1033participated in should be named now. The same holds as to prostitutes and narcotics addicts of whom the defendant wrote concerning activities and associations with the plaintiff. The essential demands in each of the items are for dates and places in addition to names of participants.

The items should be furnished *(Kleiman*v. *Beech Nut Packing Co.,*259 App. Div. 593; *Cromwell*v. *Norton,*235 App. Div. 546, *supra; Polakoff*v. *New York World-Telegram Corp.,*140 N. Y. S. 2d 814).

Settle order directing service of the bill of particulars, as modified, within 30 days of the service of a copy of the order.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 224 (Monday, November 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29616]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Office of Communications; Cancellation of a Standard Form

AGENCY: General Services Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State is cancelling the following Optional 
Form because of low usage:
OF 129, Individual Property Record Card

DATES: Effective November 20, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Barbara Williams, General Services 
Administration, (202) 501-0581.

    Dated: October 20, 2000.
Barbara M. Williams,
Deputy Standard and Optional Forms Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-29616 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-M