alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 34

Calling for a continued United States policy of opposition to the resumption

of commercial whaling, and otherwise expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to conserving and protecting the world’s whale, dolphin, and porpoise populations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1993

Mr. STUDDS (for himself and Mr. SAXTON) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Foreign Affairs and Merchant Marine and Fisheries

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Calling for a continued United States policy of opposition

to the resumption of commercial whaling, and otherwise

expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to

conserving and protecting the world’s whale, dolphin,

and porpoise populations.

Whereas there is significant widespread support in the international community for the view that for scientific, ecological, and educational reasons, whales should no longer

be hunted for profit;

Whereas many of the more than sixty species of whales and

dolphins are currently subject to direct commercial harvest, and there is concern that efforts will be made at the

1993 annual meeting of the International Whaling Com-
2

HCON 34 IH

mission to overturn the Commission’s existing moratorium on commercial whaling of large whales; and

Whereas there are unique regions of the world’s seas which

serve as important feeding grounds for many species of

whales, and where the impacts of environmental threats

are unknown: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the United States should remain opposed to

4 any resumption of commercial whaling, and should

5 work toward a moratorium on the direct commercial

6 harvest of dolphins and porpoises;

7 (2) the United States should support the estab8 lishment of appropriate international sanctuaries

9 where whaling is prohibited; and

10 (3) in promoting the conservation and protec11 tion of the world’s whale populations, the United

12 States should make the fullest use of diplomatic

13 channels, appropriate domestic and international

14 law, and all other available means.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 222 (Thursday, November 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29364]



[[Page 69309]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Performance Review Board

    As required by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-
454), Chairman William E. Kennard appointed the following executives to 
the Performance Review Board: Richard Lee, Renee Licht, David Solomon, 
Thomas Tycz.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29364 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
# Official Journal C 304A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.304.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 304A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 559 October 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.304.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 304A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 559 October 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2012/C 304A/01 | Corrigendum to the notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/245/12 — Heads of unit (AD 9) and EPSO/AD/246/12 — Heads of unit/heads of department (AD 12) having Croatian as their main language in the field of translation (OJ C 276 A, 13.9.2012) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2012/C 304A/01

Corrigendum to the notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/245/12 — Heads of unit (AD 9) and EPSO/AD/246/12 — Heads of unit/heads of department (AD 12) having Croatian as their main language in the field of translation (OJ C 276 A, 13.9.2012)

(OJ C 276 A, 13.9.2012)

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (FR) |
| 31 | (ES) |
| 37 | |
| 44 | |
| 46 | |
| 53 | |
| 55 | |
| 59 | |
| 69 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 70 | (EL) |
| 71 | (ES) |
| 74 | (HU) |
| 75 | (NL) |
| 76 | |
| 77 | (RO) |
| 84 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 86 | |
| 90 | (EN) |
| 101 | |
| 110 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 114 | |
| 121 | (BG) |
| 122 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | (PT) |
| 140 | |
| 144 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 146 | (CS/DA) |
| 160 | |
| 161 | |
| 169 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 180 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 187 | |
| 189 | |
| 197 | (DA/DE/EN/SK) |
| 198 | (EN/FR) |
| 199 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 204 | (ET/GA/LV/PT) |
| 206 | (CS) |
| 210 | (LT) |
| 211 | (MT) |
| 212 | (PL) |
| 214 | (SK) |
| 215 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 228 | (SL) |
| 266 | |
| 270 | |
| 274 | (CS) |
| 275 | (LV) |
| 276 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 278 | |
| 281 | (MT) |
| 283 | (SV) |
| 285 | (ES) |
| 288 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 290 | |
| 291 | |
| 292 | (HU) |
| 294 | (BG) |
| 296 | (BG) |
| 300 | |
| 302 | |
| 304 | (DE/EN/FR) |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

30

(FR)

31

(ES)

37

44

46

53

55

59

69

(DE/EN/FR)

70

(EL)

71

(ES)

74

(HU)

75

(NL)

76

77

(RO)

84

(DE/EN/FR)

86

90

(EN)

101

110

(DE/EN/FR)

114

121

(BG)

122

134

136

(PT)

140

144

(DE/EN/FR)

146

(CS/DA)

160

161

169

(DE/EN/FR)

180

(DE/EN/FR)

187

189

197

(DA/DE/EN/SK)

198

(EN/FR)

199

(DE/EN/FR)

204

(ET/GA/LV/PT)

206

(CS)

210

(LT)

211

(MT)

212

(PL)

214

(SK)

215

(DE/EN/FR)

228

(SL)

266

270

274

(CS)

275

(LV)

276

(DE/EN/FR)

278

281

(MT)

283

(SV)

285

(ES)

288

(DE/EN/FR)

290

291

292

(HU)

294

(BG)

296

(BG)

300

302

304

(DE/EN/FR)

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Joseph Totoritus, Plaintiff, *v.*Peter Stefan, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 29, 1958.

*Louis J. Jasne*for plaintiff.

*John P. Bowler*for defendant.

Arthur G. Klein, J.

This is a motion by plaintiff for a discovery and inspection of a statement made by plaintiff to defendant’s investigator, the record of the physical examination of the plaintiff by the defendant’s doctor, and the hospital record. The inspection of a party’s own statement to his opponent’s investigator is proper *(Urbina*v. *McLain,*4 A D 2d 589 and cases cited). While in the instant case there was no order directing the physical examination which was held by consent, I find no compelling reason for not adopting the reasoning of Mr. Justice Eder in the case of *Kuyamjian*v. *Murrah*(5 Misc 2d 204). There the question, in a motion for a physical examination, was whether the defendant should be required to furnish a copy of his doctor’s report to the plaintiff. Such requirement was included in the order. Mr. Justice Hofstadter reached the same result in the case of *Muratori*v. *1231 Pugsley Ave. Realty Corp.*(157 N. Y. S. 2d 630) as did Mr. Justice M. M. Levy in the case of *Kleinot*v. *Steiner*(5 Misc 2d 951). (See, also, *Del Ra*v. *Vaughan,*2 A D 2d 156; *Tripp*v. *Knox,*5 Misc 2d 771.) Surely, if the defendant in his application for such an examination can be directed to furnish a copy of the report, there is no valid reason why a plaintiff, having consented to the examination, should be deprived of a copy of the report. The defendant consents to furnish a copy of the hospital record. The defendant is accordingly directed to furnish copies of the statement to the investigator and the doctor’s report within 10 days after service of a copy of the order herein with notice of entry.

Settle order.
# Official Journal C 194A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.194.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 194A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 565 July 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.194.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 194A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 565 July 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 194A/01 | Publication of a vacancy notice for an Executive Director Position of the SESAR Joint Undertaking, in Brussels (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2013/10337 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2013/C 194A/01

Publication of a vacancy notice for an Executive Director Position of the SESAR Joint Undertaking, in Brussels (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2013/10337

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 117 | (ET) |
| 118 | |
| 120 | |
| 131 | |
| 143 | |
| 160 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 162 | |
| 166 | |
| 167 | |
| 168 | |
| 172 | |
| 173 | |
| 174 | |
| 176 | (BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |
| 180 | (MT) |
| 182 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 183 | (IT) |
| 191 | |
| 192 | |
| 193 | |
| 194 | |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

104

109

111

112

(DE/EN/FR)

117

(ET)

118

120

131

143

160

(DE/EN/FR)

162

166

167

168

172

173

174

176

(BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

180

(MT)

182

(DE/EN/FR)

183

(IT)

191

192

193

194

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

STEPHENS, LAWRENCE, and COGLEY

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Qwaydarius D. MCLAUGHLIN

Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 202000126

Decided: 17 December 2020

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: 

Terrance J. Reese

Sentence adjudged 31 January 2020 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement for 150 days,1 a fine of $3,000.00, reduction to E-1, 

and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: 

Commander Michael E. Maffei, JAGC, USN

For Appellee:

Brian K. Keller, Esq.

 

1 Pursuant to a plea agreement, the convening authority suspended all confinement in excess of the 136 days’ time served.
United States v. McLaughlin, NMCCA No. 202000126

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. 

§§ 859, 866. 

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000941230
<NAME> SUMMO MINERALS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           69344
<SECURITIES>                                    439710
<RECEIVABLES>                                    67833
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                576887
<PP&E>                                         6114884
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (24212)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6667559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           136528
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       7993531
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1462500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6667559
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (699419)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (699419)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (699419)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
#### Joseph L. Rosenberg, Plaintiff, *v.*Rex Realty Corp. et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

December 24, 1957.

*Morris E. Packer*for Jack Chesner and another, defendants.

*Henry Krauss*for plaintiff.

*1035Benjamin Brenner, J.

Defendants move for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice or in the alternative for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113.

Where, as here, the motion is made for summary judgment, in which affidavits are permitted, conjointly with a motion for judgment on the pleadings, in which they are not, the latter motion must be decided without consideration of the affidavits submitted in connection with the former *(Arverne Bay Constr. Co.*v. *Thatcher,*250 App. Div. 482).

The first phase of defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings is treated as one attacking the sufficiency of the complaint, and any defenses which are contained in the answer will not be considered *(Lipkind*v. *Ward,*256 App. Div. 74).

Taking the allegations of the complaint that defendants perpetrated fraud and conspiracy to effectively remove plaintiff’s mortgage lien, their foreclosure, sale and realization of moneys from the property free of plaintiff’s said lien, as being all true and giving them every favorable inference, as we must on a motion of the character here involved *(Abrams*v. *Allen,*297 N. Y. 52), I am of the opinion that a good cause of action in equity is stated *(Kossoff*v. *Wald,*241 App. Div. 483). In the latter case, which is comparable to the one at bar, the court pointed to plaintiff’s right of reinstatement of the lien of a second mortgage disposed of through manipulation and connivance between the debtor and certain of his creditors. Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings is thus denied since a sufficient cause of action is alleged entitling plaintiff to some, if not all of the relief prayed for. As to that phase of defendants’ motion seeking summary judgment, suffice it to say that the record before the court presents triable issues of fact which cannot be determined without a trial *(Barrett*v. *Jacobs,*255 N. Y. 520).

Defendants have included by reference the filed papers in the foreclosure action as part of their moving affidavits. Although the official record reveals that plaintiff herein served a notice of appearance by an attorney demanding that a copy of all papers in said foreclosure action be served upon him and that plaintiff’s attorney was served with all papers —from the motion for judgment of foreclosure to the order confirming referee’s report of sale — such record does not negate the allegations of fraud and conspiracy charged in the complaint. Obviously, if the notice of appearance was served prior to the acts complained of and plaintiff was thereafter induced to withhold his *1036answer, such service of the notice and receipt of subsequent documents in the foreclosure suit do not prejudice and are not inconsistent with his cause.

The motion is in all respects denied.

Settle order on notice.
Case 7:22-cr-00025-O Document 19 Filed 07/22/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 37
Case 7:22-cr-00025-O Document 19 Filed 07/22/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 38
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wheeling-Pittsburgh Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Paul J. Mooney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

                                   Date: November 14, 2003

                                   By: /s/ Paul J. Mooney
                                       ----------------------------
                                           Paul J. Mooney
                                           Chief Financial Officer








The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an Exhibit to this report and should not be considered filed as a
part of this report.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wheeling-Pittsburgh Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
James G. Bradley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: August 9, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ James G. BradleyJames G. BradleyChief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an Exhibit to this report
and should not be considered filed as a part of this report.
Case 1:22-cr-00050-H-BU Document 96 Filed 10/27/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 195
Case 1:22-cr-00050-H-BU Document 96 Filed 10/27/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 196
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

EUGENIO VARGA §

§

VS. § CIVIL NO. 4:22-CV-430-Y

§

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL §

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, ET AL. §

ORDER REFERRING MOTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Second Motion to

Compel Defendants’ Production of Documents (doc. 139). After

review of this motion, the Court concludes that it should be and is

hereby REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L.

Cureton for determination. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A).

All papers filed hereafter regarding this motion shall include

the following notation under the case-number: “(Relates to Motion

Referred to Magistrate Judge Cureton).”1 

SIGNED November 6, 2023.

____________________________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

The judge’s copy of all documents related to this motion

should be mailed to the Honorable Jeffrey L. Cureton, Eldon B.

Mahon United States Courthouse, 501 West 10th Street, Room 520,

Fort Worth, Texas 76102.

Case 4:22-cv-00430-Y Document 145 Filed 11/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 4519