alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 3:30 p.m. on Wednesday, February 9, 2000, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in closed session, pursuant to sections 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(8), and (c)(9)(A)(ii) of Title 5, United States Code, to consider matters relating to the Corporation's supervisory activities and reports of the Office of Inspector General.

The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of the FDIC Building located at 550—7th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 898-6757.

Dated: February 4, 2000.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-2940  Filed 2-4-00; 1:22 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT

OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

EUGENIO VARGAS,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim

Defendant,

v.

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL 

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, et al.,

Defendants/Counterclaim

Plaintiff.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-430-Y 

Judge Terry R. Means

(Relates to Motion Referred to 

Magistrate Judge Cureton)

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF PLAINTIFF ROBERT (BOB) ROSS’S 

MOTION TO QUASH

On September 25, 2023, Plaintiff Eugenio Vargas filed his Motion to Quash Notice to 

Take Deposition and for Temporary Protective Order, Dkt. No. 118 (“Motion”). Plaintiff Vargas

now files this Notice to inform the Court that he is withdrawing his previously filed Motion

because it is moot pursuant to the Order Regarding Motion to Quash and for Protective Order 

and Referring Motion to Magistrate Judge, Dkt. No. 126, signed on September 29, 2023.

 DATED: November 29, 2023 

Respectfully submitted,

K.D. PHILLIPS LAW FIRM, PLLC

By: /s/ Kerri Phillips

Kerri Phillips

Texas Bar No. 24065906 

Phone: (972) 327-5800

Email: kerri@KDphillipslaw.com

Case 4:22-cv-00430-Y Document 163 Filed 11/29/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 4765
6010 W. Spring Creek Parkway

Plano, Texas 75024

Fax: (940) 400-0089

For Service of Filings: 

notice@KDphillipslaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

 

 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the true and correct copy of this document was sent to all counsel of record, 

hereunder listed via ECF Filing on this the 29th day of November 2023.

/s/ Kerri Phillips

Kerri Phillips, Esq.

Jeffrey Bartos

Guerrieri, Bartos, & Roma, P.C. 

1900 M Street, NW, Suite 700

Washington, DC 20036

Tel: (202) 624-7400; Fax: (202) 624-7420

Email: jbartos@geclaw.com

Charlette Matts

In-House Counsel for APFA

1004 West Euless Blvd

Euless, TX 76040

Tel: (682) 301-8454

Cmatts@apfa.org

James Sanford

4803 Gaston Avenue

Dallas, TX 75249-1020

Tel: (214) 800-5111; Fax: (214) 838-

0001

Email jim@gillespiesanford.com

Email: joe@gillespiesanford.com

Case 4:22-cv-00430-Y Document 163 Filed 11/29/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 4766
United States District Court 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERJCA § 

§ 

V. § CRJMINAL ACTION NO. 3:22-CR-0232-S 

§ 

JONATHAN PIERRE BRADSHAW (2) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY 

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a 

Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning 

Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed 

within 14 days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b )(!),the undersigned District Judge 

is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea 

of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the 

plea of guilty, and JONATHAN PIERRE BRADSHAW (2) is hereby adjudged guilty of 

18 U.S.C. § 371 and 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841 and 5861(d), Conspiracy to Possess Unregistered 

Firearms. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. 

The Defendant is ordered to remain in custody. 

SO ORDERED. 

SIGNED November 9, 2022. 

Case 3:22-cr-00232-S Document 60 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 133
EXHIBIT 10

MODIFICATION AND/OR EXTENSION AGREEMENT

|Date:        |  | September 1, 1999 JED/CMM                                                                                                                     
|------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Borrower(s): |  | R-B Rubber Products, Inc.                                                                                                                     
|Lender:      |  | KeyBank National Association                                                                                                                  
|Note:        |  | Dated July 31, 1998, in the principal amount of $1,000,000.00, including any and all amendments thereto.                                      
|Loan #:      |  | 20-121729-9501                                                                                                                                
|             |  | FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Borrower and Lender hereby agree to modify the above-referenced Loan and Promissory Note and/or Loan Agreement as follows:

1.MODIFICATION AND/OR EXTENSION PROVISIONS.



2.CONDITIONS.The modifications and/or extension described above are subject to and conditioned upon
Borrower's full satisfaction of all the following conditions on or before the date first stated above, time being of the essence.



2.GENERAL PROVISIONS.Except as modified above, all other provisions of the Promissory Note and any
other documents securing or relating to the Loan (the "Loan Documents") remain in full force and effect. All security given for the Loan and all guarantees of the Loan (as applicable) shall continue
in full force. Borrower warrants and represents to Lender that it has full right, power and authority to enter into this agreement and to perform all its obligations hereunder, and that all
information and materials submitted to Lender in connection with this modification are accurate and complete. Borrower warrants that no default exists under the Loan Documents. Borrower reaffirms its
obligation to pay the Loan in full and reaffirms the validity and enforceability of the Loan Documents, without
set-off, counterclaim or defense.

ORAL
AGREEMENTS OR ORAL COMMITMENTS TO LOAN MONEY, EXTEND CREDIT, OR TO FORBEAR FROM ENFORCING REPAYMENT OF A DEBT ARE NOT ENORCEABLE UNDER OREGON LAW.

|LENDER:                      |  | BORROWER:                
|---------------------------- |  | -------------------------
|KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION |  | R-B RUBBER PRODUCTS, INC.
|By:                          |  |                          
|                             |  |                          
|                             |  | John MarshVice President
I N T H E U N IT E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION 

JASON WALTERS

PLAINTIFF 

 

vs. CIVIL ACTION 3:22-cv-01840-C

 JURY REQUESTED

EXEL, INC. D/B/A 

DBA DHL SUPPLY CHAIN

DEFENDANT

 

PLAINTIFF’S RULE 26(A)(2) DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT TESTIMONY

TO: EXEL, INC. D/B/A DHL SUPPLY CHAIN, by and through their attorney of record, Ms.

Annie Lau, Fisher & Phillips, LLP., 500 North Akard Street, Suite 3550, Dallas, Texas 75201,

alambert@fisherphillips.com

COMES NOW, Plaintiff JASON WALTERS in the above-entitled and numbered

cause, and makes this his Disclosure of Expert Testimony as required by Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) and this court’s prior order.

I. Retained Expert

Bob Whiteurst

Attorney at Law

5380 Old Bullard Road

Suite 600, #363

Tyler, Texas 75703

Will testify as to attorney fees incurred in the case currently before the court, if Plaintiff is

successful in claims brought against the defendant. Said attorney fees were reasonable and

necessary as a result of said claims.

Don E. Uloth

Attorney at Law

18208 Preston Road, Suite D-9 #261

Dallas, Texas 75252

Case 3:22-cv-01840-K Document 53 Filed 11/24/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 685
Will testify as to attorney fees incurred in the case currently before the court, if Plaintiff is

successful in claims brought against the defendant. Said attorney fees were reasonable and

necessary as a result of said claims.

Respectfully submitted,

_/S/________________

 Bob Whitehurst

State Bar No. 21358100

Bob Whitehurst

5380 Old Bullard Road

 Suite 600, #363

Tyler, Texas 75703

(903)593-5588

(214)853-9382

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was

served upon the attorney's of record in accordance with the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure

on this 24h day of November, 2023

Bob Whitehurst

Bob Whitehurst

Theanna Bezney

Texas Bar No. 24089243

tbezney@fisherphillips.com

FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP

500 North Akard Street, Suite 3550

Dallas, Texas 75201

Telephone: (214) 220-9100

Facsimile: (214) 220-9122

Ms. Annie Lau

 Fisher & Phillips, LLP.,

500 North Akard Street

 Suite 3550, Dallas, Texas 75201,

alambert@fisherphillips.com

Case 3:22-cv-01840-K Document 53 Filed 11/24/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 686
# C_2019432EN.01005101.xml

| 23.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/51

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2019 — ZV v Commission

(Case T-684/18) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Vacancy notice - Commission’s deputy mediator - Procedure - Assessment of the merits)

(2019/C 432/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ZV (represented by: J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Radu Bouyon, G. Berscheid and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision of 8 February 2018 appointing A as the Commission’s deputy mediator and the note of 12 February 2018 by which the Commission informed the applicant of the outcome of the selection procedure.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders ZV to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ZV to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 35, 28.1.2019.

---
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. 383 Madison Avenue31st FloorNew York, New York 10179  RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-C29 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C29 Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"): (a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and (b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  March 1, 2016  /s/ Brian SmithBRIAN SMITHVice President  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
# Official Journal C 122/20 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 122 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4820 May 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 122

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4820 May 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| | The OLAF Supervisory Committee |
| 2005/C 122/1 | Activity report — June 2003 to July 2004 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

The OLAF Supervisory Committee

2005/C 122/1

Activity report — June 2003 to July 2004

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 243

Designating August 1, 1993, as ‘‘National Incest and Sexual Abuse Healing

Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 28, 1993

Ms. MOLINARI (for herself, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. FRANKS of

New Jersey, Mrs. KENNELLY, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ,

Mr. SERRANO, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. HAMBURG, Mrs. MINK, Mr.

CAMP, Mr. QUINN, Mr. FISH, Mrs. MORELLA, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. PAXON, Mr. LEVY, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mrs. ROUKEMA, Mr.

SCHIFF, Mr. KING, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. SYNAR, Ms. DELAURO, Mr.

OLVER, Mr. HINCHEY, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. MANTON, Mr. BAKER of California, Mr. DELAY, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. HOBSON, Mr. GINGRICH, Mr. LEWIS

of California, Mr. GREENWOOD, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. GEKAS, Mr.

HOEKSTRA, Mr. NADLER, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. BONILLA, Mr. BALLENGER,

Mr. LIGHTFOOT, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. MCCREY, Mr. ANDREWS of New

Jersey, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mrs. UNSOELD, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr.

ROHRABACHER, Mr. SKEEN, Mr. SUNDQUIST, Ms. MCKINNEY, Mrs.

CLAYTON, Mr. HUGHES, Mr. GUNDERSON, and Mr. TRAFICANT) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating August 1, 1993, as ‘‘National Incest and Sexual

Abuse Healing Day’’.
2

HJ 243 IH

Whereas child abuse occurs in alarming proportions, with

2,900,000 reported cases in 1992, increasing by 50 percent between 1985 and 1992;

Whereas sexual abuse of children, including abuse by family

members, is a crime crossing all social or economic

boundaries in the United States;

Whereas child abuse is frequently perpetuated, as one generation of victims becomes the next generation of abusers,

creating a vicious cycle of violence;

Whereas opportunities to speak out publicly and truthfully

about child sexual abuse are deemed of value by numerous survivors and victims’ advocates, as a means to promote public awareness and understanding and to foster

a sense of support for and among victims;

Whereas open and honest dialogue is a prerequisite for

progress in combating child abuse; and

Whereas August 1, 1993, will be the first nationwide

‘‘speakout’’ by survivors of incest and child sexual abuse:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That August 1, 1993, is designated as ‘‘National Incest

4 and Sexual Abuse Healing Day’’, and the President is au5 thorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling

6 upon the people of the United States to observe such day

7 with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
#### Ethel MEFFERD, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 22880.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 31, 1944.

C. O. McMillan, of Stephenville, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for aggravated assault and battery. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of 90 days and a fine of $50.

Since perfecting her appeal, appellant has filed a written motion, duly verified, requesting the privilege of withdrawing the same. The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCKDTVISION

I.'NITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-054-01-H

DAMODRICK DESHLIN

RUTHERTORD,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE I,]NTTED STATES MAGISTRATE JI]DGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GI,.IILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

0 636OXl), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

Dated A]ugost LL ,2022.

JAMES

UNITE

SLEYHENDRIX

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:22-cr-00054-H-BQ Document 24 Filed 08/22/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 42
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69921-69922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29686]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-91-000]


El Paso Natural Gas Co.; Notice of Tariff Filing

November 15, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 9, 2000, El Paso Natural Gas Company 
(El Paso) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, the 
following tariff sheets, in compliance with the Commission's order 
issued September 19, 2000 at Docket No. RP00-313-000, with an effective 
date of January 1, 2001:

Second Revised Volume No. 1-A

Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 20
Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 22
Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 23
Twenty-Second Revised Sheet No. 24
Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 26
Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 27

[[Page 69922]]

Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 28
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 37
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 38
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 256
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 257

Third Revised Volume No. 2

Forty-Seventh Revised Sheet No. 1-D.2
Forty-First Revised Sheet No. 1-D.3.

    El Paso states that the tariff sheets are being filed to revise the 
Gas Research Institute surcharges and to update the identification of 
low and high load factor shippers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29686 Filed 11-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
(ORDER LIST: 600 U.S.) 

TUESDAY, AUGUST 8, 2023 

ORDER IN PENDING CASE 

23A82 GARLAND, ATT’Y GEN., ET AL. V. VANDERSTOK, JENNIFER, ET AL. 

The application for stay presented to Justice Alito and by 

him referred to the Court is granted. The June 30, 2023 order 

and July 5, 2023 judgment of the United States District Court for 

the Northern District of Texas, case No. 4:22-cv-691, insofar as 

they vacate the final rule of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

Firearms and Explosives, 87 Fed. Reg. 24652 (April 26, 2022), are 

stayed pending the disposition of the appeal in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and disposition of a 

petition for a writ of certiorari, if such a writ is timely 

sought. Should certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate 

automatically. In the event certiorari is granted, the stay 

shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this 

Court. 

Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, Justice Gorsuch, and Justice 

Kavanaugh would deny the application for stay. 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 249-1 Filed 08/09/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 4977
# C_2005093EN.01000902.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/9

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation de Belgique (Court of Cassation, Belgium) (First Chamber), by order of that court of 20 January 2005, in the case of the Belgian State v Ring Occasions and Fortis Banque

(Case C-42/05)

(2005/C 93/17)

Language of the case: French

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Cour de cassation de Belgique (First Chamber), of 20 January 2005, received at the Court Registry on 3 February 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between the Belgian State and Ring Occasions and Fortis Banque, on the following questions:

| 1. | Where the recipient of a supply of goods is a taxable person who has entered into a contract in good faith without knowledge of a fraud committed by the seller, does the principle of fiscal neutrality in respect of value added tax mean that the fact that the contract of sale is void, by reason of a rule of domestic civil law which renders the contract incurably void as contrary to public policy on the ground of illegal basis of the contract attributable to the seller, cannot cause that taxable person to lose his right to deduct that tax? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Where the recipient of a supply of goods is a taxable person who has entered into a contract in good faith without knowledge of a fraud committed by the seller, does the principle of fiscal neutrality in respect of value added tax mean that the fact that the contract of sale is void, by reason of a rule of domestic civil law which renders the contract incurably void as contrary to public policy on the ground of illegal basis of the contract attributable to the seller, cannot cause that taxable person to lose his right to deduct that tax?

| 2. | Is the answer different where the contract is incurably void for fraudulent evasion of VAT itself? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the answer different where the contract is incurably void for fraudulent evasion of VAT itself?

---