alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smithway Motor Xpress Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, G.
Larry Owens,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                /s/ G. Larry Owens
                             ----------------------------------------
                             G. Larry Owens
                             Chief Financial Officer
                             November 13, 2003

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Smithway  Motor Xpress Corp.  and will be retained by Smithway Motor
Xpress Corp.  and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
From: Corkran, Jerry L [mailto:Jerry.Corkran@CooperIndustries.com]

Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 6:07 PM

To: Richard Parker

Cc: Caitlin Johnson; rick.anderson@faypwc.com; tb allo@earthjustice.org; ScottB@lvmetals.com;

john.caskey@nema.org; john.cymbalsky@ee .doe.gov; adelaski@standardsasap.org;

Teckman@nwcouncil.org; gbf1@pge.com; carlos.g aytan@ge.com; rgreeson@federalpacific.com;

bruce.r.hirsch@bge.com; mhyland@appanet.org ; dave.millure@metglas.com; Nadel, Steve;

wes.patterson@us.abb.com; Eric.Petersen@ak steel.com; Raymond.Polinski@atimetals.com;

rroy@nrdc.org; robert.saint@nreca.coop; chuck.simm ons@pgnmail.com; mark.stoering@xcelenergy.com;

cabolduc@lbl.gov; kcoughlin@lbl.gov; Brian Coffey; gjrosenquist@lbl.gov; Rosenstock, Steven; Michael

Rivest; Jerry Hodge; jrossetti@mlgw.org; Jim.creevy@nema.org; Meyers, Aaron;

Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov; jmauer@standar dsasap.org; greg.coulter405@gmail.com;

bsmith@federalpacific.com; pkumar@publicpowe r.org; Trujillo, Antonio; Phil Hopkinson;

ahofmann@publicpower.org; BermanEconomics@gmail.com; Paul.Ryan@hitmet.com;

jerry.schoen@aksteel.com; mwaltner@nrdc.org; kwinder@mleainc.com; chad.kennedy@us.schneiderelectric.com; eduardorobles@eaton. com; vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com

Subject: Comparison of the total losses for M3 and Amorphous core 25 kVA Transformers

Mr. Parker,

The attached memo is being sent to explain to you and the DOE working group why an

evaluation of the losses at 50% load of the efficiencies does not encompass the entire picture. The

memo explains one of the reasons why we believe that amorphous core transformers are the wrong

choice for th e national energy efficiency standards.

Jerry Corkran
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT No.
2

TO

INVENTERGY GLOBAL, INC.

2014 STOCK PLAN


Adopted on September
9, 2015


 


This Amendment No. 2 to Inventergy Global,
Inc. 2014 Stock Plan, as amended (the Inventergy Global, Inc. 2014 Stock Plan, the “Plan” and this Amendment No. 2,
the “Amendment”), is made effective as of  September 9, 2015 by Inventergy Global, Inc. (the “Company”).


 


WITNESSETH: 


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of
the Company (the “Board”) deems it advisable and in the best interest of the Company to amend the Plan pursuant to
this Amendment to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan; and


 


WHEREAS, the stockholders of the
Company approved this Amendment at the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on September 9, 2015 pursuant to
Section 10(d) of the Plan.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended
as follows:


 


Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended
to read in its entirety as follows:


 


“(a) Basic Limitation.  Not
more than Five Million, Three Hundred Five Thousand, Four Hundred Forty Five (5,305,445) Shares may be issued under the Plan, subject
to Subsection (b) below and Section 8(a).2 All of these Shares may be issued upon the exercise of ISOs. The number of Shares that
are subject to Options or other rights outstanding at any time under the Plan may not exceed the number of Shares that then remain
available for issuance under the Plan. The Company, during the term of the Plan, shall at all times reserve and keep available
sufficient Shares to satisfy the requirements of the Plan. Shares offered under the Plan may be authorized but unissued Shares
or treasury Shares.”


 


Exhibit A containing the “Schedule
of Shares Reserved for Issuance under the Plan” is hereby updated to take account for this Amendment. All other terms and
provisions of the Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect as written.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 2
is made effective this 9th day of September, 2015.


INVENTERGY GLOBAL, INC.


 


	 	By:	/s/ Joseph W.
Beyers
	 	 	Name: Joseph W. Beyers
	 	 	Title:  Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 155 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 155

  Designating October 6, 1993, and October 6, 1994, each as ``German-
                            American Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 1993

   Mr. Hamilton introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Designating October 6, 1993, and October 6, 1994, each as ``German-
                            American Day''.

Whereas since the arrival of the first German immigrants to America on October 
        6, 1683, in the area of Germantown, Pennsylvania, German-Americans have 
        made significant contributions to the quality of life in the United 
        States;
Whereas German-Americans are proud of the existing friendship and cooperation 
        between the Federal Republic of Germany and the United States, of which 
        the German-American Friendship Garden in Washington, DC, is evidence;
Whereas German-Americans pledge their unconditional support for further 
        expansion of the existing friendship between Germany and the United 
        States, and will continue to contribute to the culture of the United 
        States, support its government and democratic principles, and will also 
        work to help assure the freedom of all people; and
Whereas the Congress unanimously passed joint resolutions designating October 
        6th of 1987, 1988, 1989, and 1990 each as ``German-American Day'': Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That October 6, 1993, and 
October 6, 1994, are each designated as ``German-American Day'', and 
the President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation 
calling on the people of the United States to observe such days with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK; MICHAEL 

G. ANDREN; TACTICAL MACHINING 

LLC, a limited liability company; 

FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, 

INC., a nonprofit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BLACKHAWK MANUFACTURING 

GROUP INC., doing business as 80 

PERCENT ARMS,

Intervenor Plaintiff, 

v. 

MERRICK GARLAND, in his Official 

capacity as Attorney General of the 

United States; UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; STEVEN 

DETTELBACH, in his official capacity as 

Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, 

Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; 

BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, 

FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

ORDER

Plaintiffs in the instant action have moved for a preliminary injunction (ECF Nos. 15, 63), 

which the Court granted in part (ECF Nos. 56, 89). Now pending before the Court is IntervenorPlaintiff BlackHawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms’ Motion for Preliminary 

Injunction (ECF No. 102), filed October 20, 2022. On August 29, 2022, the Court—citing its 

authority under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a)(2) to advance and consolidate the hearing

on a preliminary injunction with the trial on the merits—invited the parties to brief the issue of 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 107 Filed 10/25/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1413
2

consolidation (ECF No. 33). All parties opposed consolidation on the grounds that production of 

the Administrative Record was required prior to trial on the merits (See ECF Nos. 53–54).

The Administrative Record was lodged yesterday on October 24, 2022 (ECF No. 10). Now 

that the record is available, the Court intends to exercise its authority under Rule 65(a)(2) to 

consolidate the hearing on preliminary injunction to a trial on the merits—but will do so only with 

respect to Counts I (Excess of Statutory Authority Under 5 U.S.C. § 706) of Plaintiffs’ and 

Intervenor-Plaintiff’s complaints. See Pls.’ Am. Compl. 41, ECF No. 93, Intervenor-Pl.’s Compl. 

26, ECF No. 99. To afford the parties adequate opportunity to review the record and “a full 

opportunity to present their respective cases,” Univ. of Tex. V. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 395 

(1981), the Court ORDERS that the parties supplement their briefing regarding Plaintiffs’ 

statutory interpretation claims no later than 14 days after the Court resolves any pending motions 

to supplement the Administrative Record and such supplemental records, where required, are 

produced. 

SO ORDERED this 25th day of October, 2022. 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 107 Filed 10/25/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1414
----

Action brought on 31 March 2005 by Charlotte Becker and Others against the European Parliament

(Case T-139/05)

(2005/C 132/63)

Language of the case: French

An action against the European Parliament was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 31 March 2005 by Charlotte Becker, residing in Manton (France), Seamus Killeen, residing in Sutton (Dublin), Robert Payne, residing in Terenure (Dublin), Deirdre Gallagher, residing in Terenure, Paul Van Raij, residing in Overveen (Netherlands), Wilhemus Van Miltenburg, residing in Huizen (Netherlands), represented by Georges Vandersanden, Laure Levi and Aurore Finchelstein, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of their action, the applicants put forward the same pleas in law and arguments as those put forward in Case T-35/05.

----
Page 1 of 2

Diby Ako v. Arriva Best Security, Inc., et al.

U.S.D.C. (N.D. Tex.) Case No. 3:22-cv-1751-S

Brief in Support of Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DIBY AKO PLAINTIFF

vs. No. 3:22-cv-1751-S

ARRIVA BEST SECURITY, INC., DEFENDANTS

and AMOIFO KOFFI

 

BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION 

FOR CLERK’S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

Plaintiff Diby Ako (“Plaintiff”) filed his Original Complaint against Defendants Arriva 

Best Security, Inc. and Amoifo Koffi on August 12, 2022. See ECF No. 1

Defendant Arriva Best Security Inc.’s deadline for filing and serving an Answer or 

Motion to Dismiss was April 10, 2023. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1) (requiring service of 

an Answer within 21 days after service of the summons and complaint). Defendant Arriva 

Best Security, Inc. has not filed or served an Answer or Motion to Dismiss in accordance 

with Rule 12(a)(1). See Sanford Decl. ¶ 4. No extension for filing or serving a proper 

Answer or Motion to Dismiss has been requested or granted by Defendant Arriva Best 

Security, Inc. See Sanford Decl. ¶ 5.

Defendant Arriva Best Security, Inc. is in default, and the Clerk should enter its 

default as mandated by Rule 55(a).

WHEREFORE, premises considered, Plaintiff Diby Ako, individually and on behalf 

of all others similarly situated, respectfully requests that the Clerk enter the default of 

Defendant Arriva Best Security, Inc. and for attorney’s fees and costs incurred herein, 

Case 3:22-cv-01751-S Document 26 Filed 08/29/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 93
Page 2 of 2

Diby Ako v. Arriva Best Security, Inc., et al.

U.S.D.C. (N.D. Tex.) Case No. 3:22-cv-1751-S

Brief in Support of Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default

and for all other good and proper relief to which he may be entitled, whether or not 

specifically requested herein.

Respectfully submitted,

PLAINTIFF DIBY AKO

SANFORD LAW FIRM, PLLC

Kirkpatrick Plaza

10800 Financial Centre Parkway, Suite 510

Little Rock, Arkansas 72211

Telephone: (501) 221-0088

Facsimile: (888) 787-2040

/s/ Josh Sanford

Josh Sanford

Tex. Bar No. 24077858

josh@sanfordlawfirm.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned counsel, do hereby certify that on the date imprinted by the 

CM/ECF system, a copy of the foregoing BRIEF was filed via the CM/ECF system, which 

will provide notice to all interested parties. Notice has been delivered by other means to:

Arriva Best Security Inc.

c/o Aimee Koffee

5482 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 219

Los Angeles, CA 90036

Amoifo Koffee

9955 Durant Drive, Unit 304

Beverley Hills, CA 90212

/s/ Josh Sanford

 Josh Sanford

Case 3:22-cv-01751-S Document 26 Filed 08/29/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 94
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted), Wayne Wetherell Chief Financial Officer of ImageWare Systems, Inc.(the ***“Company”***),hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.     The Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSBfor the period ended September 30, 2005 (the ***“Report”***) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of theCompany at the end of the periods covered by the Report and the results ofoperations of the Company for the periods covered by the Report.

 

 

Dated:  November 21, 2005

 

 
| /s/  Wayne Wetherell                      |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Wayne  Wetherell  Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to ImageWare Systems, Inc. and will be retained by ImageWareSystems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
**Exhibit 12.2**

 

**Certification by the Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Ralf Schmid, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Nabriva Therapeutics AG (the “Company”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:   April 28, 2016 |
|-----------------------------|
|                        |   |
| By:                         | /s/ Ralf Schmid |   |
| Name:                       | Ralf Schmid |   |
| Title:                      | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20825

Conference Calendar

 

SUZANNE FRAME ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

SUZANNE FRAME,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ALLAN JAMES ET AL.,

Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus

S-H, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-86-4589

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We must examine the basis of our jurisdiction on our own

motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th
No. 96-20825

-2-

Cir. 1987). The district court’s order declining to disqualify

the appellees’ attorney, declining to cancel the bi-weekly

reporting requirement imposed on appellant Suzanne Frame, and

declining to vacate orders designating Frame’s alter egos is not

within the category of orders regarding receiverships that is

reviewable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(2). The record does

not indicate that the portion of the district court’s order

regarding the bi-weekly reporting requirement is the type of

discovery order that is appealable. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v.

Energy Gathering, Inc., 2 F.3d 1397, 1405 n.16 (5th Cir. 1993). 

Nor does the record indicate that Frame would lose the

opportunity for appellate review of her contentions regarding the

appellees’ attorney and the designation of her alter egos in a

later appeal from a conclusive judgment in the judgment

creditors’ attempt to collect on the judgment against her should

we now decline to consider her contentions. We lack jurisdiction

to consider Frame’s contentions.

Frame’s appeal is frivolous and is part of a pattern of

abuse of the appeal process. We caution Frame that any

additional frivolous appeals filed by her or on her behalf will

invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Frame is

further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that

they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
AMENDMENT
#1 TO THE SHARE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT


DATED
JUNE 22, 2015


 


THIS
AMENDMENT #1 TO THE SHARE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT DATED June 22, 2015 (the “Amendment”) is made effective as of September
2, 2015, by and between Quint Media, Inc., OncBiomune, Inc., Robert L. Elliott, M.D., and Jonathan F. Head, Ph. D. (collectively
the “Parties”).


 


BACKGROUND


 


A.
The Parties entered into that certain share exchange agreement dated June 22, 2015 (the “SEA”). A true and correct
copy of the SEA is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”; and


 


B.
The Parties desire to amend the SEA as set forth expressly below.


 


NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the execution and delivery of the Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.
All references to “3,000,000” in the SEA shall be replaced in its entirety by “4,493,372”.


 


2.
All references to “50,000,000” in the SEA shall be replaced in its entirety by “51,493,372”.


 


3.
This Amendment shall be deemed part of, but shall take precedence over and supersede any provisions to the contrary contained
in the SEA. Except as specifically modified hereby, all of the provisions of the SEA which are not in conflict with the terms
of this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of September 2, 2015.


 


	Quint Media, Inc.	 	OncBiomune, Inc.
	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Constantin
    Dietrich	 	By:	/s/ Robert
    L. Elliott, M.D.
	Name:	Constantin Dietrich	 	Name:	Robert L. Elliott, M.D.
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 	Title:	President
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Robert L. Elliott,
    M.D.	 	By:	/s/ Jonathan F. Head,
    Ph. D.
	Name:	Robert L. Elliott, M.D.	 	Name:	Jonathan F. Head, Ph. D.
Exhibit 99.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC., GENERAL PARTNER OF

HIGHWOODS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the Operating Partnership) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carman J. Liuzzo, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the
Operating Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership.
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    CARMAN J.
LIUZZOCarman J. Liuzzo Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
General Partner May 6, 2003
Case 3:22-cv-01219-X Document 215 Filed 12/17/19 Page 1 of 2 PageID 8090
Case 3:22-cv-01219-X Document 215 Filed 12/17/19 Page 2 of 2 PageID 8091