alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 00-2483; MM Docket No. 99-282; RM-9710] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; petition for reconsideration. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document dismisses a Petition for Reconsideration filed on behalf of Mountain West Broadcasting directed to the                         *Report and Order*                         in this proceeding, which denied the requested allotment of Channel 265C to Littlefield, Arizona, for failure to demonstrate that Littlefield qualifies as a community for allotment purposes.                         *See*65 FR 25463, May 2, 2000. The petition for reconsideration is dismissed as it does not meet the limited provisions set forth in the Commission's Rules under which a rule making action will be reconsidered. With this action, this docketed proceeding is terminated.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a summary of the Commission's                     *Memorandum Opinion and Order*, in MM Docket No. 99-282, adopted October 25, 2000, and released November 3, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800.                 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 00-29625 Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
**Exhibit 12.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)of the Exchange Act**

 

I, Junfeng Zhao, certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual report onForm 20-F/A of WINS Finance Holdings Inc.;

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The company’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the company and have:

 

a.      Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the company is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared;

 

b.      Intentionally Omitted;

 

c.      Evaluated the effectivenessof the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d.      Disclosed in thisreport any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by theannual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.     The company’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’sauditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.      All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.      Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting.

 

Date:   December 13, 2017
Case 3:22-cv-01261-S-BN   Document 11   Filed 09/22/22    Page 1 of 1   PageID 116
SCWC-16-0000096 & SCWC-16-0000597

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

JESSE W. JONES,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-16-0000096 & CAAP-16-0000597; 1PC121000865)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and 

Circuit Judge Johnson, in place of Wilson, J., recused)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Jesse W. Jones’ 

Applications for Writ of Certiorari, filed on October 25, 2019, 

are hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 9, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Ronald G. Johnson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-16-0000096

09-DEC-2019

02:11 PM
Case 7:22-cr-00002-O Document 26 Filed 03/17/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 46
Case 7:22-cr-00002-O Document 26 Filed 03/17/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 47
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5            

       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                   $1,646,233
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                               265,096 
<ALLOWANCES>                                185,000 
<INVENTORY>                                 150,567
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          2,097,224
<PP&E>                                    1,256,337
<DEPRECIATION>                              505,296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            2,852,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       552,787
<BONDS>                                     291,416
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                  6,634,286  
<OTHER-SE>                               (4,625,802)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              2,852,687
<SALES>                                   1,589,914
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          1,589,914 
<CGS>                                       273,283
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               273,283  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          2,197,190 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           28,013 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (  822,661)
<INCOME-TAX>                             (  823,461) 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (  823,461)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0	
<NET-INCOME>                             (  823,461) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 ( .24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 ( .24) 
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 309 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 309

   Designating April 29, 1994, as ``Davey Allison Remembrance Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 1994

   Mr. Hilliard introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Designating April 29, 1994, as ``Davey Allison Remembrance Day''.

Whereas the Nation wishes to honor the memory of one of the Nation's most 
        promising young NASCAR drivers, Davey Allison of Hueytown, Alabama;
Whereas Davey Allison, in his Ford Thunderbird, was one of the finest drivers on 
        the Winston Cup Tour;
Whereas Davey Allison had over 19 career wins, including the Daytona 500, 3 
        Winston 500's, and the 1991 Coca-Cola 600;
Whereas Davey Allison had the 10th-highest career earnings of any NASCAR driver 
        in history, with winnings of over $6,726,974;
Whereas Davey Allison hailed from one of racing's most noble and famous 
        families;
Whereas stock-car racing will not be the same without an Allison racing;
Whereas the Nation wishes to express its heartfelt sense of mourning to Davey 
        Allison's wife Liz, children Krista Marie and Robert Grey, and parents 
        Bobby and Judy; and
Whereas the world of racing will not shine as brightly without a person like 
        Davey Allison: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That April 29, 1994, is 
designated as ``Davey Allison Remembrance Day'', and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people 
of the United States to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 
activities.

                                 <all>
```
Case 4:22-cr-00035-Y Document 117 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 303
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
June 1999 Form 10-Q of Dade Behring Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            APR-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         30,400                  30,400
<SECURITIES>                                        0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 399,300                 399,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                   45,700                  45,700
<INVENTORY>                                   273,100                 273,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              753,700                 753,700
<PP&E>                                        672,900                 672,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                322,300                 322,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,637,600               1,637,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         505,000                 505,000
<BONDS>                                       350,000                 350,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                       0
<COMMON>                                            0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (176,600)               (176,600)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,637,600               1,637,600
<SALES>                                       322,600                 641,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              322,600                 641,600
<CGS>                                         145,400                 273,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 351,000                 627,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (3,600)                 (5,600)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             21,100                  41,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (45,900)                (21,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (18,400)                 (8,600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (27,500)                (12,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (8,800)                 (8,800)
<CHANGES>                                           0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (36,300)                (21,600)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0                       0


</TABLE>
REVISED INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

**DRAFT DATE: March 12, 2004** 
**ENGINEER: Macek SUMMARY: The original IRER has been revised to incorporate**  **additional information provided by the submitter.**

PMN: 03-0633 ENGINEER: Macek/CLH PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS:

CRSS (6/30/03): Chemical Category:

VP: torr @25 E C
S-H 2 O: g/L

MW: Phys State:

Consumer Use:

SAT (7/1/03): Ground Water: negligible Health: 1 (No exposures needed) Eco: 3 (All releases to water)
PBT: P1B1T1

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: NRREVISED INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 03-0633

ASSUMPTIONS:

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEWREVISED INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 03-0633
Case 4:22-cv-00657-O Document 5 Filed 08/03/22 Page 1 of 14 PageID 30
Case 4:22-cv-00657-O Document 5 Filed 08/03/22 Page 2 of 14 PageID 31
Case 4:22-cv-00657-O Document 5 Filed 08/03/22 Page 3 of 14 PageID 32
Case 4:22-cv-00657-O Document 5 Filed 08/03/22 Page 4 of 14 PageID 33
Case 4:22-cv-00657-O Document 5 Filed 08/03/22 Page 5 of 14 PageID 34
Case 4:22-cv-00657-O Document 5 Filed 08/03/22 Page 6 of 14 PageID 35
Case 4:22-cv-00657-O Document 5 Filed 08/03/22 Page 7 of 14 PageID 36
Case 4:22-cv-00657-O Document 5 Filed 08/03/22 Page 8 of 14 PageID 37
Case 4:22-cv-00657-O Document 5 Filed 08/03/22 Page 9 of 14 PageID 38
Case 4:22-cv-00657-O Document 5 Filed 08/03/22 Page 10 of 14 PageID 39
Case 4:22-cv-00657-O Document 5 Filed 08/03/22 Page 11 of 14 PageID 40
Case 4:22-cv-00657-O Document 5 Filed 08/03/22 Page 12 of 14 PageID 41
Case 4:22-cv-00657-O Document 5 Filed 08/03/22 Page 13 of 14 PageID 42
Case 4:22-cv-00657-O Document 5 Filed 08/03/22 Page 14 of 14 PageID 43
#### CALDWELL et ux. v. BOYD, District Judge.

No. 12179.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Galveston.

Jan. 9, *1941.*

Bailey P. Loftin, of Houston, for re-lators.

No appearance for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion for leave to file petition for mandamus filed herein on January 3, *1941,*by' K. J. Caldwell and wife as re-lators against the Honorable Ewing Boyd, Judge of the 55th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, as respondent. Relators seek in their petition an order-from this Court commanding the said respondent to set aside his order sustaining the contest to their affidavit of inability to pay the costs of appeal or to give security therefor in a cause numbered B-257,865 and styled Claude Clark v. Pretty Clark et al. on the docket of said District Court in which said cause the trial court rendered judgment against the relators, and from which adverse judgment relators desire to prosecute an appeal to this Court. Re-lators further request this Court to order* the respondent to direct the District Clerk of Harris County to prepare a transcript of all proceedings had in said cause without charge, and to likewise direct the Official Court Reporter for said 55th Judicial District Court to prepare and deliver to relators’ attorneys, without charge, a statement of facts in the cause. Neither the District Clerk nor the Official Court Reporter are made parties respondent to the petition for mandamus, nor are the adverse litigants brought before this Court in the petition.

Under this statement, it becomes obvious that the petition for the writ of mandamus is fatally defective for want of necessary parties. It is, therefore, our duty to refuse the motion for leave to file the petition without prejudice to relators’ right to make necessary parties and again present their cause. in this court. H. M. Cohen Lumber & Bldg. Co. v. McCalla, Tex.Civ.App., 142 S.W.2d 685; Kelly v. Lobit, Tex.Civ.App., 134 S.W.2d 428; Durden v. Patterson et al., 146 S.W.2d 296, decided by this Court on December 19, 1940, and Williams v. Wray, 123 Tex. 466, 72 S.W.2d 577.

Motion for leave to file petition for mandamus refused without- prejudice.
Case 4:22-cr-00234-P Document 49 Filed 09/14/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 157
Case 4:22-cr-00234-P Document 49 Filed 09/14/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 158
AO 399 (01/09) Waiver of the Service of Summons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To:

(Name of the plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint,

two copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within

60 days from , the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the

United States). If I fail to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date:

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Printed name of party waiving service of summons Printed name

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a summons

and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff located in

the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure.

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the plaintiff

and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been served.

 Northern District of Texas

DANIEL P. KELLY, JR.

PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC

3:22-cv-01412-N

Nathan C. Volheim

07/05/2022

PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC Thomas G. Yoxall

Locke Lord LLP 

2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800 

Dallas, TX 75201

tyoxall@lockelord.com

(214) 740-8683

July 5, 2022

Case 3:22-cv-01412-N Document 7 Filed 07/05/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 18
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00043-Z-BR

§

SALVADOR CHOLICO-VELASQUEZ (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

SALVADOR CHOLICO-VELASQUEZ (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 

(5th Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the 

Superseding Information. After cautioning and examining SALVADOR CHOLICO-VELASQUEZ (1) under oath 

concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary 

and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such 

offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that SALVADOR CHOLICO-VELASQUEZ (1)

be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C) - POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE 

FENTANYL and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: December 12, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00043-Z-BR Document 83 Filed 12/12/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 284