alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Pennsylvania Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Pennsylvania Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 9      | 11     | 10     | 10     | 8      | 8      | 8      | 8     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 8      | 8      | 8      | 8      | 8      | 7      | NA     | 6      | NA     | 6     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 6      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 5      | 3      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 3      | 3      | 3      | 3      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 157

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate September 13, 1993, as ‘‘Commodore

John Barry Day’’.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 157

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate September 13, 1993, as ‘‘Commodore John

Barry Day’’.

Whereas the United States of America is a nation of immigrants and the contributions of Irish immigrants and

their descendants to the defense of the public liberty has

been a hallmark of Irish Americans;
2

HJ 157 EH

Whereas during the War for Independence Captain John

Barry, a native of County Wexford, Ireland, achieved the

first victory for the Continental Navy while in command

of the ship ‘‘Lexington’’ by capturing the British ship

‘‘Edward’’, organizing General George Washington’s

crossing of the Delaware River which led to the victory

at Trenton in 1776, transported gold from France to

America while in command of the ship ‘‘Alliance’’, and

achieved the last victory of the war for the Continental

Navy while in command of ‘‘Alliance’’ by defeating the

British ship HMS ‘‘Sybille’’;

Whereas during the War for Independence Captain John

Barry rejected British General Lord Howe’s offer to

desert the Continental Navy and join the British Navy,

stating: ‘‘Not the value and command of the whole British fleet can lure me from the cause of my country.’’;

Whereas after the War for Independence the United States

Congress recognized John Barry as the premier American naval hero of that war;

Whereas in 1787 Captain John Barry organized the compulsory attendance of members of the Pennsylvania Assembly in Philadelphia, thus ensuring the quorum necessary

to call a Convention and recommend the ratification of

the Constitution;

Whereas on June 14, 1794, pursuant to ‘‘Commission No.

1’’, President Washington commissioned John Barry as

commodore in the new United States Navy;

Whereas Commodore John Barry helped to build and lead

the new United States Navy which included his command

of the U.S.S. ‘‘United States’’ and the U.S.S. ‘‘Constitution’’ (‘‘Old Ironsides’’);
3

HJ 157 EH

Whereas Commodore John Barry is recognized along with

General Stephen Moylan in the Statue of Liberty Museum as one of six foreign-born great leaders of the War

for Independence;

Whereas in 1991 and 1992 President George Bush proclaimed September 13 as ‘‘Commodore John Barry Day’’;

and

Whereas designating a day to commemorate Commodore

John Barry would be important to United States Navy

veterans, Irish Americans, and to all the people of the

United States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That September 13, 1993, is designated as ‘‘Commodore

4 John Barry Day’’, and the President of the United States

5 is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling

6 upon the people of the United States to observe such day

7 with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives August 5,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Solomon J. Turel, Respondent, *v.*Lester Milberg, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

October 31, 1957.

*William S. O’Connor, Archie B. Morrison*and *Patrick D. Warren*for appellant.

*Bernard A. Green*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff was playing golf at the Elmwood Country Club in a foursome with defendant and two others and was struck by a golf ball hit by defendant. Defendant’s liability is predicated on his failure to shout ‘" fore ” before hitting the golf ball. Plaintiff assumed the risk inherent in playing golf. Well *142aware of this he testified *‘ ‘*no one can tell with certainty when he hits a hall where it is going ’ Since plaintiff himself saw defendant “ about to swing” and actually saw him take the swing, defendant’s shouting *“*fore ” could have made no difference.

The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Hofstadter, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                                8398
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      4650362
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                       11838002
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  17215321
<PP&E>                                             1082779
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (239297)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    18420223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              4710284
<BONDS>                                           12359602
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             16438
<OTHER-SE>                                         5444190
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      18420223
<SALES>                                           27913025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  27913025
<CGS>                                             23719621
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     23719621
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   3485880
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  476765
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     198876
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 198876
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                            38603
<NET-INCOME>                                        237479
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.01
        


</TABLE>
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 192

Designating June 6 through 13, 1993, as ‘‘National Soccer Hall of Fame

Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1993

Mr. BOEHLERT introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating June 6 through 13, 1993, as ‘‘National Soccer

Hall of Fame Week’’.

Whereas the National Soccer Hall of Fame was established

in 1979 in Oneonta, New York, consisting of the

National Soccer Museum and Wright National Soccer

Campus;

Whereas interest in soccer among Americans is growing, as

evidenced by the holding of the 1994 World Cup in the

United States, and the growing number of world class

athletes raised on soccer being recruited to our men’s and

women’s National and Olympic teams;
2

HJ 192 IH

Whereas the Hall of Fame—the National Soccer Museum

and Wright Soccer Campus—is the keeper of the national soccer archives, with a mission to document, preserve, and promote American soccer and its history, and

provide educational services throughout the United

States; and

Whereas National Soccer Hall of Fame Week was created to

pay tribute to the history of soccer and to provide those

who helped shape that history an opportunity to gather,

remember and be remembered: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That June 6 through June 13, 1993 is designated as ‘‘Na4 tional Soccer Hall of Fame Week’’, and the President is

5 authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling

6 upon the people of the United States to observe such week

7 with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

Æ
EX-10.12



 Exhibit 10.12 

Wescom Inc. 

Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy 

The purpose of this Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy of Wescom Inc., a corporation incorporated under the Province of Ontario (the
“Company”), is to provide a total compensation package that enables the Company to attract and retain, on a long-term basis, high-caliber directors to join the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) who are
not employees or officers of the Company or its subsidiaries and are not affiliated with stockholders of the Company that own greater than five percent (5%) of the equity securities of the Company (each, a “Non-Employee
Director”). In furtherance of the purpose stated above, all Non-Employee Directors shall be paid compensation for services provided to the Company as set forth herein. All dollar amounts set forth herein are stated in United States
currency. 
 Cash Retainers 
 Annual
Retainer for Board Membership: $25,000 for general availability and participation in meetings and conference calls of the Board. 
 Additional
Retainers for Committee Membership: 
  

							
	 Committee
	  	 Position
	  	Annual Compensation ($)	 
	 Audit
	  	 Chair
	  	$	20,000	  
	  	 Member
	  	$	7,000	  
	 Compensation
	  	 Chair
	  	$	10,000	  
	  	 Member
	  	$	5,000	  
	 Nomination and Governance
	  	 Chair
	  	$	5,000	  
	  	 Member
	  	$	3,000	  

 Equity Retainers 

Upon initial election to the Board: An option to purchase 20,000 common shares (the “Initial Option Grant”) in the capital of the
Company to each new Non-Employee Director. The Initial Option Grant shall vest in accordance with the following schedule: 
  

	(a)	one-third of the Initial Option Grant shall vest on the first anniversary of the day the Non-Employee Director is appointed to the Board; 









	(b)	one-third of the Initial Option Grant shall vest on the second anniversary of the day the Non-Employee Director is appointed to the Board; and 


 

	(c)	one-third of the Initial Option Grant shall vest on the third anniversary of the day the Non-Employee Director is appointed to the Board. 


The Company may at its sole discretion grant additional options to purchase common shares in the capital of the Company based on the performance of
Non-Employee Director in his or her role as a director of the Company. 
 On the date of the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders: Each
continuing Non-Employee Director will receive an option (the “Annual Option Grant”) to purchase 5,000 common shares in the capital of the Company. The Annual Option Grant shall fully vest in full on the first anniversary of the
grant date. 
 The specific terms and conditions of all options granted are governed by the Company’s stock option plan in place from time to time and
the agreement between the Company and the Non-Employee Director, as applicable. 
 Expenses 

The Company will reimburse all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Non-Employee Directors in attending meetings of the Board or any committee of the
Company.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

LCG MERCHANT PARTNERS, LLC,

Appellant, V. DAVID L. SCHAEFERS, Appellee. NO. 2D23-1140

January 3, 2024 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Anne-Leigh Moe, Judge. Robert A. Stines of Smith Gambrell Russell, LLP, Tampa, for Appellant. David A. Hayes and Shane B. Vogt of Turkel Cuva Barrios, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. SILBERMAN, LaROSE, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
#### CLAY v. STATE.

No. 22826.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 31, 1944.

John A. Collier, H. E. Kahn, and E. T. Branch, all of Houston, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a penalty of ninety days in jail on a charge that he “did then and there unlawfully and knowingly permit a gaming table and gaming paraphernalia to remain in his possession and on his premises * * * to be used for gaming purposes, * * * being a note book commonly called a book and then and there used to record plays and bets on a policy game.”

This is a companion case to that of Thompson v. State, Tex.Crim., 180 S.W.2d 944. While the facts are similar so far as they go, they are different in that the State has wholly failed to show any connection of appellant with any part of a policy game. In other words, the record is characterized by all of the defects discussed in the Thompson case and with a great deal more, not necessary to point out.

For the reasons discussed in the Thompson case, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.
U.S. Department of the Treasury

Office of Public Affairs

Press Release: March 12, 2023

Contact: Treasury Public Affairs, press@treasury.gov

READOUT: Financial Stability Oversight Council Meeting on 

March 12, 2023 

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen convened a meeting of 

the Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) in executive session by videoconference. 

During the meeting, the Council heard updates from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 

(FDIC), Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve Board), and U.S. 

Treasury Department on actions they were taking to stabilize the financial system and protect 

depositors. The agencies described their actions to help ensure all of the depositors of Silicon 

Valley Bank and Signature Bank would be made whole. It was noted that no losses associated 

with the resolution of these banks would be borne by taxpayers and that shareholders and certain 

unsecured debtholders would not be protected. 

The Council also discussed the funding the Federal Reserve Board was making available to 

eligible depository institutions to ensure that banks, saving associations, and credit unions have 

the ability to meet the needs of all of their depositors. The new facility will be a significant 

source of liquidity, collateralized by high-quality securities, to eliminate a banking institution's 

need to quickly sell those securities in times of stress. This will bolster the capacity of the 

banking system to safeguard deposits. 

In attendance at the Council meeting by videoconference were the following members: 

• Janet L. Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury (Chairperson of the Council)

• Jerome H. Powell, Chair, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

• Michael J. Hsu, Acting Comptroller of the Currency

• Rohit Chopra, Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

• Gary Gensler, Chair, Securities and Exchange Commission

• Martin Gruenberg, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

• Rostin Behnam, Chairman, Commodity Futures Trading Commission
• Todd M. Harper, Chairman, National Credit Union Administration

• James Martin, Acting Director, Office of Financial Research (non-voting member)

• Steven Seitz, Director, Federal Insurance Office (non-voting member)

• Adrienne Harris, Superintendent, New York State Department of Financial Services

(non-voting member)

Additional information regarding the Council and its work is available at http://www.fsoc.gov.

####
No. 72-1009.

#### Flood et ux. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SkillSoft Public Limited Company (the "Company") for the period ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Thomas J. McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





SKILLSOFT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANYDate: September 9, 2009
By:
/s/ Thomas J. McDonaldThomas J. McDonaldChief Financial Officer
State Small Business Credit Initiative Application 9 – Compliance and Oversight

Applicant 

Name

OMB Control # 1505-0227 1

Please use pages 2 through 6 to describe the staff compliance and oversight. 

Staff Compliance and Oversight: Describe what reporting mechanisms, audits, or other 

internal controls and compliance activities (a) the applicant has in place or (b) need to be 

implemented to enable the applicant to conduct oversight and meet annual and quarterly 

reporting requirements for the proposed program(s). Please include information for all proposed 

programs. In addition, explain the steps you will take to promote a fair, competitive, and open 

selection and contracting process. These steps could include application and enforcement of the 

jurisdiction’s existing procurement and ethics policies, as well as new measures that your 

jurisdiction chooses to implement specifically for the SSBCI program. Examples of such policies 

to include limitation or disclosure of political contributions to the jurisdiction’s officials with 

authority to select SSBCI contractors; reporting requirements for lobbying activity, including 

lobbying related to the SSBCI contractor selection process or program implementation; or 

request-for-proposal policies to govern the process for evaluating bids for SSBCI-related 

contracts. Please provide your narrative on pages 2-6. 

Refer to the SSBCI Capital Program Policy Guidelines, Section VI. Approving States for 

Participation, subsection c. Contractual Arrangements – 12 U.S.C. § 5703(c); Section VII. 

Approving State CAPs, subsection f. Loan Purpose Requirements and Prohibitions – 12 U.S.C. § 

5704(e)(7); Section VIII. Approving State OCSPs, subsection f. Loan/Investment Purpose 

Requirements; and Prohibitions – 12 U.S.C. § 5705(f), and Section X. Reporting. 
State Small Business Credit Initiative Application 9 – Compliance and Oversight

Applicant 

Name

OMB Control # 1505-0227 2

Staff Compliance and Oversight: 
State Small Business Credit Initiative Application 9 – Compliance and Oversight

Applicant 

Name

OMB Control # 1505-0227 3

Staff Compliance and Oversight (continued): 
State Small Business Credit Initiative Application 9 – Compliance and Oversight

Applicant 

Name

OMB Control # 1505-0227 4

Staff Compliance and Oversight (continued): 
State Small Business Credit Initiative Application 9 – Compliance and Oversight

Applicant 

Name

OMB Control # 1505-0227 5

Staff Compliance and Oversight (continued): 
State Small Business Credit Initiative Application 9 – Compliance and Oversight

Applicant 

Name

OMB Control # 1505-0227 6

Staff Compliance and Oversight (continued):
# QSBL 123119

# QSBL 093019

# QSBL 063019

# QSBL 033119

# QSBL 123118

# QSBL 093018

# QSBL 063018

# QSBL 033118

# QSBL 123117

# QSBL 093017

# QSBL 063017

# QSBL 033117

# QSBL 123116

# QSBL 093016

# QSBL 063016

# QSBL 033116

# QSBL 123115

# QSBL 093015

# QSBL 063015

# QSBL 033115

# QSBL 123114

# QSBL 093014

# QSBL 063014

# QSBL 033114

# QSBL 123113

# QSBL 093013

# QSBL 063013

# QSBL 033113

# QSBL 123112

# QSBL 093012

# QSBL 063012

# QSBL 033112

# QSBL 123111

# QSBL 093011

# QSBL 063011

# QSBL 033111

# image1.png
1

The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2258

___________

United States of America, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern

v. * District of Iowa.

*

Mark Eugene Frederick, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Defendant - Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: December 10, 2008

Filed: December 15, 2008

___________

Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Mark Eugene Frederick was convicted of conspiracy to manufacture and

distribute 50 grams or more of actual methamphetamine or 500 grams of a mixture

containing methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and (b)(1)(A), and

attempted manufacture of methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and

(b)(1)(C). On appeal, Frederick argues the evidence was insufficient and the district

court1

 erred in denying his motions for judgment of acquittal and new trial. After
-2-

reviewing the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated in the

district court's well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________