alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

















[Letterhead of First Financial Northwest Bank]


August 31, 2015







[Separated Employee's name]

[address]






Re:            Notice of Your Rights


Dear [Separated Employee]:


We are writing to notify you of recent legal developments under whistleblower protection Rule 21F-17 enacted under the Dodd-Frank Act.


When your employment ended with First Savings Bank Northwest ("FSBNW"), now known as First Financial Northwest Bank, you were offered a Separation Agreement.  Under that Separation Agreement, FSBNW offered you monetary compensation and other benefits if you signed a waiver and release of claims against FSBNW and its affiliates.  The Separation Agreement stated, "Nothing in this Agreement precludes Employee from filing a charge or complaint with an appropriate administrative agency.  However, employee agrees that he or she is not entitled to and will not accept any monetary recovery as a result of filing such charge or complaint."


The Securities and Exchange Commission has recently stated, "SEC rules prohibit employers from taking measures through confidentiality, employment, severance, or other types of agreements that may silence potential whistleblowers before they can reach out to the SEC.  We will vigorously enforce this provision."   SEC Press Release, 2015-54 (April 1, 2015).


FSBNW's agreement was not intended to prevent you from reporting potential violations of the law to the SEC or other agencies, nor was it intended to preclude you from recovering any bounties or other rewards offered by the government. Accordingly, FSBNW is sending you this notice to advise you that you have the right to file a complaint with the SEC or another appropriate administrative agency. You also have the right to receive awards or rewards in the form of a whistleblower bounty under federal regulations that may provide bounties for reporting such violations.


If you have any questions about your rights under Dodd-Frank, please visit the website for the SEC Office of the Whistleblower, https://www.sec.gov/whistleblower.


 


Sincerely,


 


Joseph W. Kiley III

President, CEO & Director

First Financial Northwest Bank

First Financial Northwest, Inc.
Case 2:22-cr-00053-Z-BR Document 65 Filed 09/01/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 154
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 83

Calling upon the President to insist that the removal of Iraqi President

Saddam Hussein from power should be a condition for the cessation

of economic sanctions by the United Nations against Iraq.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 21, 1993

Mr. RAMSTAD submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Calling upon the President to insist that the removal of

Iraqi President Saddam Hussein from power should be

a condition for the cessation of economic sanctions by

the United Nations against Iraq.

Whereas under the direction of Saddam Hussein, Iraq invaded and illegally occupied Kuwait without provocation

on August 2, 1990;

Whereas the Clinton administration recently released a report

documenting the appalling war crimes committed by Iraqi

forces under the direction of Saddam Hussein against

Kuwait and its people during this occupation;

Whereas Saddam Hussein ordered the systematic execution

of Kuwaiti citizens during this occupation;
2

•HCON 83 IH

Whereas Saddam Hussein ordered the launching of

unprovoked missile attacks against Israel, a neutral country not involved in the Persian Gulf conflict;

Whereas under the direction of Saddam Hussein, Iraq’s

treatment of American and other allied prisoners of war

was repugnant and violated the 1949 Geneva Conventions concerning the treatment of prisoners of war;

Whereas Saddam Hussein ordered brutal attacks against his

own civilian population, including Shiite and Kurdish minorities;

Whereas Saddam Hussein, following Iraq’s forced withdrawal

from Kuwait, has repeatedly refused to comply with United Nations resolutions calling on Iraq to accept long-term

monitoring of its military capability, reveal foreign suppliers of key arms-related equipment, and surrender all

weapons of mass destruction; and

Whereas during the 102d Congress, the House of Representatives passed an amendment expressing the belief that

the United States should increase efforts to bring Saddam Hussein to trial for war crimes: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) it should be the policy of the United States

4 Government that the removal of Iraqi President

5 Saddam Hussein from power should be a condition

6 for the cessation of economic sanctions by the

7 United Nations against Iraq;
3

•HCON 83 IH

1 (2) the President and United States representa2 tives to the United Nations should pursue this policy

3 in all appropriate international forums; and

4 (3) the President should actively oppose any

5 attempt by the United Nations Security Council to

6 discontinue economic sanctions against Iraq without

7 the removal of Saddam Hussein from power.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that two meetings of the Partnerships Advisory Panel (Regional Partnership Agreements sections A and B) to the National Council on the Arts will be held by teleconference at 3:00 p.m. on December 12 and 3:00 p.m. on December 13, 2000 in Room 726 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20506.

These meetings are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of May 12, 2000, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.

Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

Dated: November 13, 2000.

Kathy Plowitz-Worden, 

Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.

[FR Doc. 00-29560  Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 151

Designating April 18, 1993, as ‘‘Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Remembrance

Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 15, 1993

Mr. KING introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating April 18, 1993, as ‘‘Warsaw Ghetto Uprising

Remembrance Day’’.

Whereas, half a century ago, 6,000,000 Jews were herded

into ghettos and concentration camps, starved, gassed,

and their corpses burned, while the nations of the world

remained silent;

Whereas, in April 1943, the Jews of the Warsaw Ghetto organized the first civilian resistance in Nazi Europe and

rose up against their oppressors;

Whereas courageous Jewish men, women, boys, and girls, facing certain death, repelled wave after wave of trained

Nazi soldiers, while the walls crumbled, food, water, and
2

•HJ 151 IH

ammunition ran out, and flames turned the ghetto into

an inferno;

Whereas, in the end, the ghetto was reduced to nothing but

smoke and rubble, yet the courage of the Jewish freedom

fighters endures;

Whereas the courage of the Jews who fought the Nazis 50

years ago still echoes down through the years and demands that all who lived through the horrors of the Holocaust, and all generations to come, remember, record,

and teach its lessons; and

Whereas the people of the United States should rededicate

themselves to the conviction that the world will never

know another Holocaust: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That April 18, 1993, is designated as ‘‘Warsaw Ghetto

4 Uprising Remembrance Day’’, and the President is au5 thorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on

6 the people of the United States to observe the day with

7 appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
#### Ralph H. CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 22933.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 1, 1944.

George S. McCarthy, of Amarillo, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment assessed at seven years in the penitentiary.

Appellant has filed his affidavit with this court advising that he does not desire to further prosecute his appeal and same is ordered dismissed.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 208

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favorednation treatment) to the products of the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1993

Mr. SOLOMON (for himself, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. APPLEGATE, and Mr. KING) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

(most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of the

People’s Republic of China.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress does not approve the extension of the

4 authority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of

5 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on

6 May 28, 1993, with respect to the People’s Republic of

7 China.
2

HJ 208 IH

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6058

JOSEPH MARLO REDMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICK CONROY; JOSEPH CURRAN,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA01-3410)

Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 29, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Marlo Redman, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Marlo Redman seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Redman v. Conroy, No. CA-01-

3410 (D. Md. Dec. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
FIRST
AMENDMENT

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

QUEST SOLUTION, INC.

AND

THOMAS O. MILLER


 


The
Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 2015 (the “Employment Agreement”), by and between Quest Solution, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Thomas O. Miller, an individual (the “Executive”)
is hereby amended, effective as of September 3, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), as set forth herein.


 


Paragraph
1.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby is amended by deleting Paragraph 1.1 in its entirety and substituting the following
in its place:


 


1.1
Position. Executive shall serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board, with
such duties as are customarily associated with the position of a Chief Executive Officer and President for a public company. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, Executive shall report to and perform the specific duties and responsibilities assigned to him by the Company’s
Board of Directors.


 


Except
as specifically amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and shall continue
in full force and effect.


 


[Signature
Page Follows.]


 




    	 



    	 	 	 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have executed this First Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the Effective
Date.


 


	 	QUEST
    SOLUTION, INC.	 


 


	 	By:	/s/
    Scot Ross
	 	Name:
    	Scot Ross
	 	Title:
    	Chief Financial
    Officer



 

	 	EXECUTIVE	 



 

	 	By:	/s/
    Thomas O. Miller
	 	Name:
    	Thomas
    O. Miller


 


Signature
Page to First Amendment to Employment Agreement
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                              EXHIBIT 12


                                                               MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST III
                                                                MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING III, L.P.
                                                                 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                                                   COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                                          (dollars in thousands)



                                   FOR THE YEAR ENDED                  FOR THE YEAR ENDED                FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                   DECEMBER 27, 2002                   DECEMBER 28, 2001                 DECEMBER 29, 2000
                           ---------------------------------  ---------------------------------  ----------------------------------
                              MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                                 PREFERRED       PREFERRED          PREFERRED       PREFERRED        PREFERRED       PREFERRED
                           CAPITAL TRUST III FUNDING III,L.P. CAPITAL TRUST III FUNDING III,L.P. CAPITAL TRUST III FUNDING III, L.P.
                           ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ----------------

<S>                        <C>                 <C>            <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>

Earnings                       $ 54,124           $ 63,238        $ 54,124           $ 63,472         $ 54,124            $ 63,565
                               ========           ========        ========           ========         ========            ========


Fixed charges                  $      -           $      -        $      -           $      -         $      -            $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution
 requirements                    52,500             54,124          52,500             54,124           52,500              54,124
                               --------           --------        --------           --------         --------            --------

Total combined fixed
 charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirments                   $ 52,500           $ 54,124        $ 52,500           $ 54,124         $ 52,500            $ 54,124
                               ========           ========        ========           ========         ========            ========

Ratio of earnings to
 combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements         1.03               1.17            1.03               1.17             1.03                1.17


</TABLE>
Case 2:22-cv-00146-Z Document 29 Filed 09/30/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 372
Case 2:22-cv-00146-Z Document 29 Filed 09/30/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 373
Case 2:22-cv-00146-Z Document 29 Filed 09/30/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 374
Case 4:22-cr-00240-Y Document 33 Filed 08/24/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 60
Case 4:22-cr-00240-Y Document 33 Filed 08/24/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 61
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 123

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide

for a balanced budget for the United States Government.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1993

Mr. ORTON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to provide for a balanced budget for the United

States Government.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if ratified

7 by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States
2

HJ 123 IH

1 within seven years after its submission to the States for

2 ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays of the United States for

5 any fiscal year shall not exceed total receipts to the United

6 States for that fiscal year.

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. Prior to each fiscal year, the President

8 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the

9 United States Government for that fiscal year in which

10 total outlays do not exceed total receipts.

11 ‘‘SECTION 3. For any fiscal year in which actual out12 lays exceed actual receipts, the Congress shall provide by

13 law for the repayment in the ensuing fiscal year of such

14 excess outlays. If Congress fails to provide by law for re15 payment, within fifteen days after Congress adjourns to

16 end a session, there shall be a sequestration of all outlays

17 to eliminate a budget deficit.

18 ‘‘SECTION 4. The provisions of this article may be

19 waived for any fiscal year only if Congress so provides by

20 law by a majority of the whole number of each House.

21 Such waiver shall be subject to veto by the President.

22 ‘‘SECTION 5. Total receipts shall include all receipts

23 of the United States Government except those derived

24 from borrowing. Total outlays shall include all outlays of
3

HJ 123 IH

1 the United States Government, except for those for repay2 ment of debt principal.

3 ‘‘SECTION 6. This article shall take effect beginning

4 with fiscal year 2000 or with the second fiscal year begin5 ning after its ratification, whichever is later.’’.

Æ
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 23

Authorizing the Architect of the Capitol to transfer the catafalque to the

Supreme Court for a funeral service.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1993

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the Architect of the Capitol to transfer the

catafalque to the Supreme Court for a funeral service.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol is author3 ized and directed to transfer to the custody of the Chief

4 Justice of the United States the catafalque which is pres5 ently situated in the crypt beneath the rotunda of the Cap6 itol so that the said catafalque may be used in the Su7 preme Court Building in connection with services to be

8 conducted there for the late Honorable Thurgood Mar9 shall, former Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of

10 the United States.
2

HCON 23 ATH

Æ
EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934



I, D. Scott Patterson, certify that:



| | 1. | I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F/A of FirstService Corporation; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



March 11, 2024







|/s/ D. Scott Patterson  |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|D. Scott Patterson      |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer |  | 













CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934



I, Jeremy Rakusin, certify that:



| | 1. | I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F/A of FirstService Corporation; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



March 11, 2024





|                        |  |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  | 
|/s/ Jeremy Rakusin      |  |  | 
|Jeremy Rakusin          |  |  | 
|Chief Financial Officer |  |  |
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

I, Sumito Mulchandani, certify that:

 

(a)                                 A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)                                 To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.

 

 

Dated March 21, 2017

 

 
|   | /s/ Sumito Mulchandani                |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Sumito Mulchandani                    |
|   | Assistant Treasurer of                |
|   | Ford Motor Credit Company LLC,        |
|   | as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner |
|   | Trust 2015-B                          |

 

----
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4377 — Doughty Hanson/Caudwell Group Mobile Distribution Business)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2006/C 209/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----