alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DUNCAN v. STATE.

No. 25717.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 5, 1952.

E. Newt Spivey, Texarkana, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for driving a motor vehicle on a public road while intoxicated; the punishment, 60 days in jail and a fine of $50.

Appellant gave notice of appeal when his motion for new trial was overruled on November 29, 1951. The term of Court at which he was tried adjourned on December 1, 1951.

This court is without jurisdiction of the appeal where appeal bond was resorted to by appellant before the adjournment of the term at which he was convicted. See Koerner v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 218 S.W.2d 1004; Watson v. State, 149 Tex.Cr.App. 9, 190 S.W.2d 830; Jones v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 31 S.W.2d 644; Turner v. State, 153 Tex.Cr.R. 614, 223 S.W.2d 236; Fowler v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 228 S.W.2d 512.

In the absence of a proper recognizance or appeal bond and appellant being at large, we are without jurisdiction to enter any order other than to dismiss the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed. •

Opinion approved by the court.
Exhibit
12.1



CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I,
Valentios Valentis, certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Pyxis Tankers Inc.; and



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.



Date:
June 6, 2019



|/s/
    Valentios Valentis                                | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Valentios Valentis                                        | 
|Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
    Officer) |
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Hawaii Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Hawaii Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 2      | 2      | 2     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | NA     | 2      | NA     | 2     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 1     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Oregon Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Oregon Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | NA     | 1      | NA     | 1     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
AAM-09-185-E Nov 29 2010 Exemption No. 9852A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0289

Mr. Kevin Waters Director of Operations Waters Aero-Marine, Inc.

P.O. Box 273 South Thomaston, ME 04915

Dear Mr. Waters:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 9852. It explain the basis our decision and describes its effects.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated November 15, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Waters Aero-Marine, Inc. (Waters Aero-Marine), for an extension of Exemption No. 9852, as amended. That exemption § 121, appendices I and J of Title 14,Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Waters Aero-Marine to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program.

Although you requested relief from part 121, appendices I and J, that section has since been redesignated to part 120. The redesignation was included in the “Drug and Alcohol Testing Program” final rule published in the Federal Register on May 14, 2009 (74 FR 22649).

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Waters Aero-Marine.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9852, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Waters Aero-Marine are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Waters Aero-Marine part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

Dr. Frederick E. Tilton Federal Air Surgeon
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 110

To authorize the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to

conduct appropriate programs and activities to acknowledge the status

of the county of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘World Capital of

Aerobatics’’, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 16, 1993

Mr. PETRI introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

JOINT RESOLUTION

To authorize the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to conduct appropriate programs and activities to acknowledge the status of the county of Fond

du Lac, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘World Capital of Aerobatics’’,

and for other purposes.

Whereas the International Aerobatic Club, which was founded

on February 6, 1970, held its first championships in

August 1970 in the county of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin;

Whereas in 1992 the International Aerobatic Club had 5,342

members throughout the world, representatives of which

gathered in Fond du Lac to compete in the 23d Annual
2

•HJ 110 IH

Aerobatic Championships during the period of August

9–14, 1992;

Whereas in 1992 the Experimental Aircraft Association and

the Board of Directors of the International Aerobatic

Club named Fond du Lac as the ‘‘World Capital of

Aerobatics’’;

Whereas participants and spectators drawn to the aerobatic

championships in Fond du Lac stimulate the economic

well-being of the community and provide a spectator

event of international significance; and

Whereas Congress declares that the county of Fond du Lac,

Wisconsin, is the ‘‘World Capital of Aerobatics’’: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Adminis4 tration may conduct appropriate programs and activities

5 at the Fond du Lac County Airport to acknowledge the

6 status of the county of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, as the

7 ‘‘World Capital of Aerobatics’’, and that the airport may

8 display signs notifying the public of such status.

Æ
----

(2004/C 84 E/0911)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0600/04

by Generoso Andria (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(23 February 2004)

Subject:   Remuneration of amateur football managers

Football is a very popular sport in Italy which is played by large numbers of young people.

The astronomical sums paid to professional footballers have created major problems for all clubs and have required government intervention in the form of the ‘Spalma-debiti’ decree allowing clubs to spread their debts over ten years.

This decree is now under close scrutiny by the Competition Commissioner Mario Monti.

Amateur football is a sport which gives young people the opportunity to develop their physical and mental skills in the open air and participation has always been unpaid or the amounts involved have been very small.

The chairmen of amateur clubs also incur considerable expenses without any remuneration apart from their love of the game.

However, other managers in the football sector, from the President of the League to board members, are known to receive remuneration of thousands of euro in the form of per diem allowances to cover their expenses, which are questionable from the tax point of view and circumvent the provisions of Article 10 of the law governing the Italian Football Federation (FIGC) which says that the duties performed by officers shall not be remunerated and prohibits offices in the federation from being held by those who derive financial gain from their involvement in football.

Can the Commission say whether this situation amounts to a distortion of competition in a particularly sensitive sector or involves serious irregularities?

Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission

(25 March 2004)

Regarding the question of whether the fact that the President and board members of the football League — as opposed to chairmen of amateur clubs — are remunerated, amounts to a distortion of competition or involves serious irregularities with respect to the law governing the Italian Football Federation (FIGC), the Commission wishes to indicate the following:

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Diversified Futures Fund Limited Partnership and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial instruments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                     164,943,807
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  868,901<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             169,284,138<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               169,284,138<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,708,107<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,618,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,089,921
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         12,089,921
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,089,921
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $589,440 and due from DWR
of $279,461.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $3,471,430.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $2,276,877, accrued brokerage
commissions of $469,732, accrued management fees of $441,631,
administrative expenses payable of $131,768 and accrued transaction fees
and costs of $34,695.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $11,502,267, net
change in unrealized of $3,481,594 and interest income of $1,724,246.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ralph Belotti, Appellant.

Appeals by defendant from (1) a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), rendered March 7, 1989, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (two counts) under indictment No. 88-65, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and (2) a judgment of the same court, rendered April 11, 1989, convicting him of bail jumping in the second degree under indictment No. 88-347, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the appeal from the judgment rendered under indictment No. 88-65 is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment rendered under indictment No. 88-347 is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of bail jumping in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt. The People’s evidence proved that the defendant was allowed to remain at liberty on bail after his conviction on burglary charges pending sentencing and he failed to appear on the date set for sentencing or voluntarily within 30 days thereafter *(see,*Penal Law § 215.56). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of *685guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

Contrary to the defendant’s further contention, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by refusing to grant him a one-week continuance for the purpose of retaining an expert witness to testify as to the effects of the defendant’s drug addiction. The defendant failed to demonstrate a good-faith attempt to secure an expert prior to his request for an adjournment *(see, People v Green,*140 AD2d 370; *People v Daniels,*128 AD2d 632).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]), without merit, or, to the extent that any error may have existed, it was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence against the defendant *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68164-68165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29022]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 35-27268]


Filings Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as 
Amended (``Act'')

November 6, 2000.
    Notice is hereby given that the following filing(s) has/have been 
made with the Commission pursuant to provisions of the Act and rules 
promulgated under the Act. All interested persons are referred to the 
application(s) and/or declaration(s) for complete statements of the 
proposed transaction(s) summarized below. The

[[Page 68165]]

application(s) and/or declaration(s) and any amendment(s) is/are 
available for public inspection through the Commission's Branch of 
Public Reference.
    Interested persons wishing to comment or request a hearing on the 
application(s) and/or declaration(s) should submit their views in 
writing by November 30, 2000, to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Washington, DC 20549-0609, and serve a copy on the relevant 
applicant(s) and/or declarant(s) at the address(es) specified below. 
Proof of service (by affidavit or, in the case of an attorney at law, 
by certificate) should be filed with the request. Any request for 
hearing should identify specifically the issues of facts or law that 
are disputed. A person who so requests will be notified of any hearing, 
if ordered, and will receive a copy of any notice or order issued in 
the matter. After November 30, 2000, the application(s) and/or 
declaration(s), as filed or as amended, may be granted and/or permitted 
to become effective.

The Southern Company (70-8277)

    The Southern Company (``Southern''), 270 Peachtree Street, NW., 
Atlanta, Georgia 30303, a registered holding company, has filed a post-
effective amendment under sections 6(a) and 7 of the Act and rules 53 
and 54 under the Act to an application-declaration previously filed 
under the Act.
    By orders dated August 3, 1995 and December 22, 1999 (HCAR Nos. 
26349 and 27119), Southern was authorized, among other things, to issue 
and sell in one or more transactions, through September 30, 2004 
(``Authorization Period''), up to 25 million shares of its authorized 
but unissued common stock, $5 par value (``Authorized Shares''). The 
number of Authorized Shares may be adjusted to reflect any share split 
or distribution authorized by the Commission. Southern now requests 
that the number of Authorized Shares that may be issued during the 
Authorization Period be increased from 25 million to 35 million.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, 
under delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29022 Filed 11-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of the Secretary

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Tali R. Stepp, Director of Human Resources, Room C5526, U.S. Department of Labor, Frances Perkins Building, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210, telephone: (202) 219-9191.

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 9th day of November, 2000.

Alexis M. Herman,

Secretary of Labor.

[FR Doc. 00-29371  Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-23-M