alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              1,623
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              3,343
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                      100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                        0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        32,072
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                    0
<LOANS>                                            42,670
<ALLOWANCE>                                           344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     81,779
<DEPOSITS>                                         53,853
<SHORT-TERM>                                       12,518
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                   858
<LONG-TERM>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                               83
<OTHER-SE>                                         14,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                     81,775
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                     1,848
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   1,027
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                       62
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                    2,937
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                  1,214
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  1,606
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                               1,326
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                           0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                      0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                     1,048
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       302
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                            302
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                          181
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       4.28
<LOANS-NON>                                           126
<LOANS-PAST>                                            0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                        0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                       399
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                      312
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                           5
<RECOVERIES>                                           35
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                     344
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                  344
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                 0
        


</TABLE>
1 

## Permit Alteration **Source Analysis & Technical Review** Company **PPG Industries, Inc.** Permit Number **898** City **Wichita Falls** Project Number **178473** County **Wichita** Account Number **WH**
**- 0040**  **- R**  Project Type **Revision** Regulated Entity Number **RN102522950** Project Reviewer **Mr. Bill Moody, P.E.** Customer Reference Number **CN600124614** Site Name **Flat Glass Manufacturing Facility** 
**Project Overview** PPG Industries Inc. has requested an alteration to NSR Permit No. 898 that authorizes their Flat Glass Manufacturing Facility in Wichita Falls, Wichita County. The company has requested that Air Quality Standard Permit for Pollution Control Project (PCP STDPMT) No. 103006 be incorporated by reference into NSR Permit No. 898. The PCP STDPMT authorized a fuel

- conservation project to be installed during an end

- of

- campaign cold shut down to rebrick Melting Furnace No. 2 (Emission Point No. [EPN] 23). Maximum allowable emission rates for EPN 23 are listed in the following table. The PCP STDPMT authorization included annual emission rates for NO x, CO, PM, PM 10 , and PM 2.5 that reflected the baseline actual emission rates plus the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) significant emission rates minus 0.1 ton. This approach results in a decrease in allowable emission rates. The emission rates for VOC and SO 2 remained the same since this approach would result in an increase over the existing permit limits. The requested change does not result in an increase in emissions, release of a new air contaminant not previously authorized, or change in the character of emissions. Therefore, the requested change qualifies for an alteration.
**Emission Summary Air Contaminant**  **Current Allowable Emission Rates (tpy)**  **Proposed Allowable Emission Rates (tpy)**  **Change in Allowable Emission Rates (** **tpy)** PM 310.98 291.90 - 19.08 PM 10 310.98 269.12

- 41.86 PM 2.5 - - 252.63 +252.63* VOC 5.08 5.08 0.00 NO X 3236.82 2947.49 - 289.33 CO 700.80 154.83

- 545.97 SO 2 350.40 350.40 0.00 * The prop osed Maximum Allowable Emission Rates Table (MAERT) includes PM2.5 emissions that were evaluated and authorized in a past permitting action but were not previously included on the MAERT.

**Permit Concurrence and Related Authorization Actions** Is the applicant is in agreement with special conditions? **Yes** Company representative(s): **Mr. Daniel Gagne, PPG Industries Inc.** Contacted Via: **Mail** Date of contact: **May 15, 2012** Other permit(s) or permits by rule affected by this action: **Yes** List permit and/or PBR number(s) and actions required or taken: **PCP STDPMT 103006 will remain active**  **upon issuance of this action.**

Project Reviewer Date Team Leader/Section Manager/Backup Date
Case 4:22-cv-00498-O Document 1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1
Case 4:22-cv-00498-O Document 1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 2 of 7 PageID 2
Case 4:22-cv-00498-O Document 1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 3 of 7 PageID 3
Case 4:22-cv-00498-O Document 1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 4 of 7 PageID 4
Case 4:22-cv-00498-O Document 1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 5 of 7 PageID 5
Case 4:22-cv-00498-O Document 1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 6 of 7 PageID 6
Case 4:22-cv-00498-O Document 1 Filed 06/08/22 Page 7 of 7 PageID 7
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 207

To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage stamp in honor

of Dr. Martha Hughes Cannon.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 27, 1993

Mr. ORTON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage

stamp in honor of Dr. Martha Hughes Cannon.

Whereas in 1896, Dr. Martha Hughes Cannon became the

first woman state senator in Utah and the first woman

state senator in the United States;

Whereas Dr. Cannon was a leader in the areas of education

and health care, whose accomplishments included establishing the first nurse training school and the State board

of health in Utah, and helping to provide for compulsory

education for deaf, blind, and disadvantaged children, as

well as protections for the health of women in the work

force;
2

•HJ 207 IH

Whereas Dr. Cannon was a leader in the women’s suffrage

movement; and

Whereas Dr. Cannon was an outspoken, independent thinker

and women’s advocate who was firm in her defense of

women working and engaging in worthwhile activities

outside the home: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the United States Postal Service is authorized and

4 requested to issue a commemorative postage stamp in

5 honor of Dr. Martha Hughes Cannon.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                 ------------





               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Integrated Data Corp (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Abe
Carmel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of Integrated Data Corp.


Date:  August 26, 2008          By:  /s/ Abe Carmel
                                     --------------
                                     Abe Carmel
                                     Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Integrated Data Corp. and will
be retained by Integrated Data Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal C 256/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 256 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 654 July 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 256

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 654 July 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2022/C 256/01 | Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 6 June 2022 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Parliament

2022/C 256/01

Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 6 June 2022 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|U.S. Refinery Shell Storage Capacity of Biomass-Based Diesel Fuel as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|U.S. Refinery Shell Storage Capacity of Biomass-Based Diesel Fuel as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 19     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 26144.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 7, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful sale of an alcoholic beverage in a dry area; the punishment, one day in jail.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment is affirmed.
#### GORDON v. WILLIAMS.

No. 4014.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Sept. 16, 1942.

Sharfstein, Bell & Weinert, of Beaumont, for appellant.

J. R. Beck, of Beaumont, for appellee.

WALKER, Chief Justice.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted, and the original opinion withdrawn. This was an action in the county court at law of Jefferson county, by ap-pellee, L. A. Williams, against appellant, Julius Gordon, for the balance due on an account of hire. The judgment in the court below was in favor of appellee against appellant for the amount sired for. The point presented arises on the construction of Rule No. 169, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Under this rule appellee propounded to appellant twelve interrogatories which he declined to answer. The interrogatories were on the very points put in issue by appellee’s petition. On appellant’s refusal to answer, appellee, under Rule No. 169, was given judgment, without the introduction of any evidence for the amount sued for. Within about two hours after the judgment was rendered, and before it was prepared, appellant came into court and tendered written answers duly verified to all of appellee’s interrogatories, and moved for a new trial. The motion was overruled.

It affirmatively appears that appellee would have suffered no injury had appellant been granted a new trial; he could *868have had a trial at once on the merits and no delay would have resulted to him.

It is our conclusion on this rehearing that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial and in refusing to receive his sworn answers to the interrogatories. The liberal doctrine announced by our Supreme Court in Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, 134 Tex. 388, 133 S.W.2d 124, compels this conclusion. Appellant had duly answered appellee’s petition, and certainly he was in no worse condition on the facts of this case than if judgment had been against him by default. Rule No. 169 will perform a most useful office in our jurisprudence, provided it is wisely administered. It should not be so construed as to give one litigant an advantage over his opponent, permitting him to have judgment without supporting testimony when, without injustice to either party, the case can be opened for a full hearing on the evidence.

The judgment of the lower court is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,568
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,757
<ALLOWANCES>                                       320
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,473
<PP&E>                                           8,691
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,837
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,668
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,454
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,442
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,312
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,371
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,878
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,493
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,493
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>
Department of the Treasury Quarterly FOIA Report

Fiscal Year 2022, Quarter Q3

1. Ten Oldest Pending Requests: 7

2. Ten Oldest Requests Closed: 3

3. Agency Component Abbreviations

Component 

Abbreviation Component Name

BEP Bureau of Engraving and Printing

DO Departmental Offices

FinCEN Financial Crimes Enforcement Network

Fiscal Service Bureau of the Fiscal Service

IRS Internal Revenue Service - Headquarters Office

MINT United States Mint

OCC Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

TIGTA Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration

TTB Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
Agency / 

Component

Number of requests 

backlogged

Number of requests 

processed

Number of requests 

received

BEP 25 13 12

DO 1366 160 165

FinCEN 34 33 43

Fiscal Service 3 89 85

IRS 1135 1864 2028

MINT 76 5 18

OCC 40 383 408

TIGTA 0 57 57

TTB 8 18 23
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 906**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Fritsch, President and Chief Executive Officer of Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the Operating Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ EDWARDJ.FRITSCH                                                           |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward J. FritschPresident and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner |   |
| November 14, 2007                                                   |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-27-1997
<CASH>                                              33
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       49
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        751
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   833
<PP&E>                                             543
<DEPRECIATION>                                     252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              623
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1199
<SALES>                                            464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   464
<CGS>                                              351
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Secured Digital  Applications,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period ending June 30, 2008 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Kelvin  Choon-Huat Ng, Chief  Accounting  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/  Kelvin Choon-Huat Ng

Kelvin Choon-Huat Ng
Chief Accounting Officer
August 14, 2008
#### BYROM v. STATE.

No. 26360.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 15, 1953.

Bryon L. McClellan, Gatesville, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, ■ State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $100. •

The jurat affixed to the complaint does not show that the complaint was *854sworn to before an officer authorized to administer the oath required under the provisions of Article 415, C.C.P. Stanley v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R. 350, 158 S.W.2d 785; Neely v. State, 144 Tex.Cr.R. 92, 161 S.W.2d 294; and cases1 cited therein.

A valid complaint is a prerequisite to a valid information.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.