alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### COMMONWEALTH ex rel. ALLPHIN v. STUMBO.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 5, 1953.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Hal Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., and George Akin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

*911No appearance for respondent.

WADDILL, Commissioner.

This case is before us on petitioner’s motion to make permanent a temporary writ of prohibition heretofore issued by this Court. The purpose of this action, is to prevent the respondent Judge from further proceeding in a suit filed in the Floyd County Quarterly Court by Joe I. May in which Mr. May seeks restoration of his motor vehicle operator’s license.

Mr. May’s automobile operator’s license was revoked by the Department of Revenue for a period of one year following' his second conviction of operating an automobile on -a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. KRS 186.560(4). Mr. May now,seeks the return of his license, but refuses to furnish the Department of Revenue with proof of his financial responsibility,as required by KRS 187.450(l)-(2). He attempts to circumvent the provision of this statute by the action he filed in the Floyd County Quarterly Court.

In Commonwealth, v. Harris, 278 Ky. 218, 128 S.W.2d 579, we held that the’ right to operate an automobile on a-public highway is a privilege subject to reasonable regulation, and that revocation of it denies' the holder of the privilege no guaranteed right. And in Ballow v. Reeves, Ky., 238 S.W.2d 141, we upheld the constitutionality of KRS 187.330, which provides that the Department of Revenue may require proof of financial responsibility as a condition to the right of operating a motor vehicle.

Therefore, we conclude that the action of the Department of Revenue in refusing the issuance of an automobile operator’s license to Mr. May was proper in view of his refusal to comply with the law. KRS 187.-450.

Petitioner , contends that the Quarterly Court is without jurisdiction to entertain an action for restoration of an operator’s license when the revocation was made under the mandatory provisions of the financial' responsibility law. KRS 186.580(2); also see, May v. Moore, Ky., 249 S.W.2d 518. We find this contention to be meritorious. Under KRS 186.580(2) the Quarterly Court’s jurisdiction is limited to cases of discretionary suspensions of licenses. In all other cases of suspensions or revocations of licenses the circuit court is the forum in which the aggrieved party must institute his' action against the Department for relief. KRS 187.300(3).

Wherefore, the motion to make permanent the temporary writ of prohibition heretofore issued by this Court is sustained and the temporary writ is hereby made permanent prohibiting the respondent, Henry Stumbo, Judge of the- Quarterly Court of Floyd County from proceeding further in the case of Joe I. May v. Department of Revenue, et al.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 138 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 138

 To designate the week beginning April 12, 1993, as ``National Public 
                    Safety Telecommunicators Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 1993

    Mr. Markey introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To designate the week beginning April 12, 1993, as ``National Public 
                    Safety Telecommunicators Week''.

Whereas over one-half million dedicated men and women are engaged in the 
        operation of emergency response systems for Federal, State, and local 
        governmental entities throughout the United States;
Whereas these individuals are responsible for responding to the telephone calls 
        of the general public for police, fire and emergency medical assistance 
        and for dispatching such assistance to help save the lives and property 
        of our citizens;
Whereas such calls include not only police, fire and emergency medical service 
        calls but those governmental communications related to forestry and 
        conservation operations, highway safety and maintenance activities, and 
        all of the other operations which modern governmental agencies must 
        conduct; and
Whereas America's public safety telecommunicators daily serve the public in 
        countless ways without due recognition by the beneficiaries of their 
        services: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week beginning April 
12, 1993, is hereby designated as ``National Public Safety 
Telecommunicators Week''. The President is authorized and requested to 
issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to 
observe that week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>       5

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           Jul-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                    16,293,000
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              8,705,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          28,067,000
<PP&E>                                     5,811,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               772,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           171,746,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     27,581,000
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                     112,000
<OTHER-SE>                               144,053,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             171,746,000
<SALES>                                   16,870,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          16,870,000
<CGS>                                     23,105,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             16,473,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (22,708,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (22,708,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                             (22,708,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.70)







</TABLE>
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 10
- 00236
- CR
STEPHEN RUFFIN , Appellant
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 52nd District Court Coryell County, Texas Trial Court No. FAM
- 05
- 17804

MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury convicted Stephen Ruffin of aggravated assault on a public servant in nine separate cause numbers. Ruffin filed a notice of appeal for eight of the convictions, but due to a clerical error, a notice of appeal was not filed for one conviction. The Court of Criminal Appeals grante d Ruffin’s writ of habeas corpus allowing him to file an out of time appeal. Ruffin now appeals his conviction of aggravated assault on a public
servant in trial court cause number FAM

- 05

- 17804. We reverse and remand.Ruffin v. State Page 2

On original submission, this Court affirmed Ruffin’s eight convictions for aggravated assault on a peace officer. Ruffin v. State , 234 S.W.3d 224 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2007). The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed this Court’s decision and remanded the
case for further consideration. Ruffin v. State , 270 S.W.3d 586 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). On September 23, 2009, this Court reversed Ruffin’s eight convictions, and remanded
the cause to the trial court. In his sole issue on appeal, Ruffin contends that the disposition of this appeal is governed by the doctrine of the law of the case. On remand from the Court of Criminal Appeals, this Court held that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding Ruffin’s proferred expert testimony under T EX
. R. E VID . 403. We found that the error was
harmful , and remanded the cause for further proceedings.
The legal principle or doctrine of the law of the case provides that an appellate court's resolution of a question of law in a previous appeal of the same case will govern the disposition of the same issue should there be another appeal. Ware v. State , 736 S.W.2d 700, 701 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987) . W hen the facts and legal issues in a case on appeal are virtually identical with those in a previous appeal in which the legal issues were resolved then logic and reason dictate that the appeals be viewed as the same case.
Id . We agree that the law of the case governs this appeal. We sustain Ruffin’s sole issue on appeal. We reverse the judgment of conviction and remand the cause for further proceedings.Ruffin v. State Page 3 AL SC OGGINS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Reverse and remand Opinion delivered and filed July 13 , 2011 Do not publish [CR 25]
exh4_2.htm










Exhibit 4.2


 


 


 






 



  





  











  






 


 





 



A BRITISH COLUMBIA BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT COMPANY


SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS


in the Authorized share structure of the above named Company subject to the Articles of the Company transferable on the Central Securities Register of the


Company by the registered holder in person or by attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.


This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and Registrar of the Company.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Company has caused this certificate to be signed on its behalf by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers, at Vancouver,


British Columbia.


C0000000230 | M


SPECIMEN


* * * 0 * * *


Aug 27, 2015


00000000


Number Shares


FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES WITHOUT PAR VALUE IN THE CAPITAL OF


IS THE REGISTERED HOLDER OF


THIS CERTIFIES THAT


Dated:


The shares represented by this certificate are transferable at the offices of Computershare Investor Services Inc. in Vancouver, BC or at the offices of Computershare Trust Company, N.A. in Canton, MA, Jersey City, NJ and


College Station, TX.


Stellar Biotechnologies, Inc.


COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED


COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY, N.A.


(CANTON, MA, JERSEY CITY, NJ AND COLLEGE


STATION, TX)


TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR


COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED


COMPUTERSHARE INVESTOR SERVICES INC.


(VANCOUVER)


OR TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR


By _____________________________


Authorized Officer


By ____________________________


Authorized Officer


President and Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer


* * * * 0 * * * * * * * * *


* * * * * 0 * * * * * * * *


* * * * * * 0 * * * * * * *


* * * * * * * 0 * * * * * *


* * * * * * * * 0 * * * * *


CUSIP 85855A203


ISIN CA85855A2039


Stellar Biotechnologies, Inc.


CSAE_WIP_CQHQ_C02.mtl.pulls/000001/000001/i
#### DRURY v. DRURY.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 29, 1952.

M. C. Anderson, Wickliffe, for appellant.

Flavious B. Martin, Mayfield, Dee L. McNeil, Hickman, for appellees.

COMBS, Justice.

This suit was filed by M. F. Glidewell as next friend for H. H. Drury. It was stated in the petition that H. H. Drury was a person of unsound mind. The prayer was for cancellation of certain deeds of conveyance previously executed by him. Named as defendants were the grantees in the deeds. Before answer was filed H. H. Drury filed a motion, with supporting affidavit, to dismiss the action. In his affidavit he denied he was of unsound mind, and stated the suit was filed without his authority. Upon the authority of Howard v. Howard, 9 S.W. 411, 10 Ky.Law Rep. 478, the trial judge directed that the question of competency be submitted to a jury.

The jury returned a verdict that “H. H. Drury is incompetent to manage his estate.” The court thereupon entered an order directing the county judge to appoint a com- - mittee for Mr. Drury for the purpose of prosecuting to a final conclusion the action filed by M. F... Glidewell as next friend. This appeal is from that order. After the record was filed here, Mr. Drury died and motion has been filed to revive the appeal in the name of C. K. Davis, administrator with the will annexed of the estate of H. H. Drury.

It is' apparent the appeal is moot. The order directing the county judge to appoint a committee for H. H. Drury has been suspended pending the appeal and cannot now be carried out because Mr. Drury is no longer living. We know of no provision in our law for appointment of a committee1 for a deceased person. No acts of the committee are in question because he performed no acts. It, therefore, is unnecessary for us to decide whether any error was committed in the proceedings in th£ lower court..

The motion to revive the appeal is overruled.

The appeal is dismissed as moot.
P.1 

OAR Box 1867 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

75) ll-B-129 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 12/2/2008 6:27:24 AM Sheet 75 of 95 
P.2 

A-90-19 

ll-B-129 

PENDING CONFIDENTIAL 

fl E E E 0 W 1 

^ SEP 4 1992 

J 

The following information is located in the. 

files of the Director, Emission Standards Division, Office of Air 

Quality Planning and Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711. This 

information is confidential pending final determination by the 

Administrator and is not available for public inspection. 

W. Floyd, Radian Corporation, to Process'Vents Docket 

A-90-19, November 1991, HON NESHAP: Industry 

Characteristics/Benzyl Benzoate. 12 pages. 

CBI Document Control No. 86/23, PPS-129.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 3 MONTHS ENDING MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          30,537
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,739
<ALLOWANCES>                                       210
<INVENTORY>                                      1,061
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,577
<PP&E>                                           2,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                     984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,383
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,982
<OTHER-SE>                                    (28,264)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,280
<SALES>                                          3,705
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,705
<CGS>                                            1,472
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,531
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    61
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 188
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,021)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,021)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,021)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)


</TABLE>
#### James AVERY, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 22932.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 11, 1944.

No attorney for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for passing a forged instrument, punishment assessed being two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant has filed his affidavit advising this court that he desires to have his appeal dismissed. It appearing that appellant does not desire to further prosecute his appeal the same is ordered dismissed.
| CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                            |
| SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     |

|   | 1.     | TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                    |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                        |
|   | 2.     | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial conditions and results ofoperations of Electrameccanica Vehicles Corp.  |

| Date:April 19, 2018 | /s/ Jerry Kroll                 |   |
|---------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                | Name:Jerry Kroll                |   |
|                | Title:Chief Executive Officer   |   |
|                | (PrincipalExecutive Officer)    |   |
|                |                            |   |
|                |                            |   |
| Date:April 19, 2018 | /s/ Kulwant Sandher             |   |
|                | Name:Kulwant Sandher            |   |
|                | Title:Chief Financial Officer   |   |
|                | (PrincipalFinancial Officer and |   |
|                | PrincipalAccounting Officer)    |   |
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6142

NOAH R. ROBINSON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. J. HUTCHINSON, Warden/Custodian , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 6:19

- cv
- 02831

- RMG )

Submitted : July 21, 2020 Decided: July 23, 2020

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Noah R. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Noah R. Robinson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Robinson’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (201 8 ) petition without prejudice because Robinson’s nearly identical motion was pending
in the Western District of Tennessee. We have reviewed the record and find no re versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v.
Hutchinson , No. 6:19

- cv
- 02831

- RMG (D.S.C. Jan. 14, 2020 ) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69129-69130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29268]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Intelligent Transportation Society of America; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS 
AMERICA) will hold a meeting of its Coordinating Council on Tuesday, 
December 5, 2000. The following designations are made for each item: 
(A) is an ``action'' item; (I) is an ``information item''; and (D) is a 
``discussion'' item. The agenda includes the following: (1) 
Housekeeping Items, i.e. Introductions, Statements of Antitrust 
Compliance and Conflict of Interest, and Previous Minutes (I); (2) 
Federal Report (I&D); (3) President's Report (I); (4) Council 
Membership Issues Discussion (I/D/A); (5) Adoption of ITS America 
Privacy Principles (D/A); (6) Break (20 minutes) (A); (7) Progress 
Report: Joint Task Force on ITS Deployment Strategy (I/D); (8) Approval 
of IVI Advice letter to USDOT (D/A); (9) Progress Report: 10-Year 
Program Plan & Research Agenda (I/D); (10) Closing Housekeeping--Next 
meeting: TBD.

[[Page 69130]]

    ITS AMERICA provides a forum for national discussion and 
recommendations on ITS activities including programs, research needs, 
strategic planning, standards, international liaison, and priorities. 
The charter for the utilization of ITS AMERICA establishes this 
organization as an advisory committee under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (FACA), 5 USC app. 2, when it provides advice or 
recommendations to DOT officials on ITS policies and programs. (56 FR 
9400, March 6, 1991).

DATES: The Coordinating Council of ITS AMERICA will meet on Tuesday, 
December 5, 2001 from 8 a.m.-Noon (Eastern Standard time).

ADDRESSES: Wyndham Miami Beach Resort, 4833 Collins Ave., Miami Beach, 
Florida, 33140. Phone: (305) 532-3600 and Fax: (305) 538-2807.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Materials associated with this meeting 
may be examined at the offices of ITS AMERICA, 400 Virginia Avenue, 
SW., Suite 800, Washington, D.C. 20024. Persons needing further 
information or to request to speak at this meeting should contact 
Carren Kaston at ITS AMERICA by telephone at (202) 484-4669, or by FAX 
at (202) 484-3483. The DOT contact is Kristy Frizzell, FHWA, HVH-1, 
Washington, D.C. 20590, (202) 366-0722. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. 
to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except for legal holidays.

(23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48)

    Issued on: November 9, 2000.
Whitey Metheny,
ITS Joint Program Office.
[FR Doc. 00-29268 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P