alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT January 4, 2006 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK ( DO NO T P UB L I S H) I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 10421 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D ocketN o. 04 -000 20 -C R -6 U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s M I C H A E L H E A D R I C K , D e f e n d an t- A p p e llan t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f G e o r g ia

_________________________ ( J anua ry4, 2006) B efo re T JO F L A T , D U B IN A an dC A RN E S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M:2

Jul i an B . S m i th, Jr . , appo i nt ed coun se l for M i chae l H ea dri ck i n thi s di re ct c r i m i na l appe a l , f

i l e d ar e ne w e d m ot i on t o w i thdr aw f r om f urthe rr e pr e s e nt a t i on of the appe l l anta nd f

i l e d abr i e f

pur s uantt o A nde r s v. C a l i f orni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 1396, 18 L . E d. 2d 493 ( 1967) . W e de ni e d c ouns e l ’ s r e ne w e d m ot i on w i thout prej ud i ce and o rder ed hi m t o p rovi de a transcr i ptof the R ul e 11 chang e- of-pl ea hear i ng . C ou nselhas now supp l em ent ed the re cord on appea w i th the re qu es t ed tr an s c r ip t, an dw e c o n s tru e th is f ilin g a s ar e s ub m is s io n o f h is r e n e w e dm o tio n to w ith d r aw an dA n d e r s b r ie f . O u rin d e p e n d e n t r e v ie w o f th e e n tir e r e c o r dr e v e a ls th atco u n sel ’ s assessm en to f th e rel at i v e m eri to f th e ap p eal i s co rrect . B ecau se in d e p e n d e n t e x a m in a tio n o f th e e n tir e r e c o r dr e v e a ls n o a r g u ab le is s u e s o f m e r it, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , a nd H e a dr i c k’ s c onvi c t i on and se nt ence ar e A FFI R M ED .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         194,339
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  742,108
<ALLOWANCES>                                    70,000
<INVENTORY>                                    468,530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,227,625
<PP&E>                                         436,958
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,020,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,320,040
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       956,312
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,020,720
<SALES>                                     19,064,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,064,368
<CGS>                                       17,178,583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,153,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,168,446)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,168,446)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,168,446)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Larry Webb, Appellant

No. 06-17-00066-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 5th District Court of Bowie 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 15-F-0870-005). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief 

Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess 

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Larry Webb, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs 

of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 22, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                   17,285
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            25,498
<ALLOWANCES>                             (2,064)
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         45,673
<PP&E>                                   53,481
<DEPRECIATION>                          (26,609)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          276,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    80,077
<BONDS>                                  96,689
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                    152
<OTHER-SE>                               90,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            276,023
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         74,475
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            69,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            344
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        1,541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           2,850
<INCOME-TAX>                              1,413
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       1,437
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              1,437
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.10
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the Operating Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward J. Fritsch, President and Chief Executive Officer of Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the Operating
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ EDWARD J. FRITSCH                                       
|Edward J. Fritsch                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
|October 6, 2006
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Entrust Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report'). I, Scott J. Sax, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By:/s/ Scott J. Sax
      Scott J. Sax, Chief Executive Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:
APRIL 14, 2003
#### In the Matter of Henry D. Cohen, Petitioner, against C-C Clubs, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

February 6, 1958.

*58
      *Max Freund, Andrew J. Schoer*and *Donald Laventhall*for petitioner.

*John Schulman*and *Solomon A. Klein*for respondents.

Aron Steuer, J.

In 1956 respondent corporation made a contract with several affiliated corporations. As a part of that contract these corporations were given the right to nominate a director on respondent’s board. Petitioner was the director so nominated and elected. Differences arose between the parties to, the contract and resulted in litigation. In that litigation petitioner co-operated with the other corporations. Respondent called attention to his equivocal position. He then brought this proceeding to inspect respondent’s books and records. Before the return date a special meeting of the stockholders ousted petitioner as a director.

Petitioner maintains that he still has a right to examine the books, claiming that, even if his ouster was legal, a former director may still examine the books for the period that he was a director. There is such a qualified right but it is limited to the situation where the former director’s conduct has been called into question and the inspection is needed to prepare his defense *(Matter of Cohen*v. *Cocoline Prods.,*309 N. Y. 119). No such need is shown here except the possibility that there may be a stockholder’s suit and in it petitioner’s stewardship may be challenged. That possibility exists with regard to every director of every corporation. There is not the slightest evidence that such an action is imminent or even contemplated. Under such circumstances granting an inspection would be a gross abuse of discretion.

But it is further claimed that petitioner’s ouster is illegal and that he is still a *de jure*director. This may or may not be true. It would depend on many facts including the by-laws of the corporation, any special provisions arising from the peculiar position of petitioner in relation to the corporation, whether petitioner waived any irregularities and the like. Such issues, unless the facts are admitted cannot be summarily disposed of in a collateral proceeding. If petitioner desires to contest his ouster (or amotion, the correct technical term, see *Matter of Koch,*257 N. Y. 318, 321), he may do so in proceeding brought for that purpose where the issues may be properly framed and determined. If successful he may then get the inspection he seeks.

Motion denied.
# QSBL 093019

# QSBL 063019

# QSBL 033119

# QSBL 123118

# QSBL 093018

# QSBL 063018

# QSBL 033118

# QSBL 123117

# QSBL 093017

# QSBL 063017

# QSBL 033117

# QSBL 123116

# QSBL 093016

# QSBL 063016

# QSBL 033116

# QSBL 123115

# QSBL 093015

# QSBL 063015

# QSBL 033115

# QSBL 123114

# QSBL 093014

# QSBL 063014

# QSBL 033114

# QSBL 123113

# QSBL 093013

# QSBL 063013

# QSBL 033113

# QSBL 123112

# QSBL 093012

# QSBL 063012

# QSBL 033112

# QSBL 123111

# QSBL 093011

# QSBL 063011

# QSBL 033111

# image1.png
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6077

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TIMOTHY LEE FEWELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-92-284-P, CA-96-444-P)

Submitted: March 9, 1999 Decided: April 19, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Lee Fewell, Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Sullivan,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Fewell has waived appellate review of the denial of the

related motions by failing to present argument in his informal

brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Lee Fewell seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion to reconsider/reopen a prior action filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1996), and related motions.*

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. The district court properly construed

Fewell’s motion to reconsider/reopen as a second or successive §

2255 motion. Before filing a second or successive motion in the

district court, Fewell must obtain authorization from this court.

See 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2244(b)(3)(A), 2255 (West Supp. 1998). Because

Fewell has not obtained such authorization, the district court’s

dismissal of his motion to reconsider/reopen was not in error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smithway Motor Xpress Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Douglas C. Sandvig, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Douglas C. Sandvig
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Douglas C. Sandvig
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        November 9, 2006
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

IPSEN BIOPHARM LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

GALDERMA LABORATORIES, L.P.,

and GALDERMA RESEARCH & 

DEVELOPMENT, LLC,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00662-O

FINAL JUDGMENT

On August 23, 2022, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Injunctive 

Relief (ECF No. 21). Having granted that Motion, the Court now enters final judgment pursuant 

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the above-styled-andnumbered lawsuit, is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED on this 8th day of March, 2023.

Case 4:22-cv-00662-O Document 59 Filed 03/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1279
Case 5:22-cr-00051-H-BQ Document 25 Filed 09/06/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 48
Case 5:22-cr-00051-H-BQ Document 25 Filed 09/06/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 49
Exhibit 4.3

Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated September 10, 2015, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-205909) of Smart Trust,
New Jersey Municipal Portfolio of Closed-End Funds Trust, Series 7.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


September 10, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2925]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permit Modifications Issued Under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act of 1978, Public Law 95-541

SUMMARY:  The National Science Foundation modified a permit to conduct 
activities regulated under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 
(Public Law 95-541).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Joyce Jatko, Office of Polar 
Programs, Room 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230.

DESCRIPTION OF PERMIT AND MODIFICATION: On September 25, 1998, the 
National Science Foundation issued a permit (ACA #99-010) to Dr. Rennie 
S. Holt after posting a notice in the August 27, 1998 Federal Register. 
No public comments were received. A request to modify the permit was 
posted in the Federal Register on December 23, 1999. No public comments 
were received. The modification, issued by the Foundation on January 
27, 2000, allows for tooth extraction from up to 100 adult Antarctic 
fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) per year for age determination. The 
tooth extractions will be taken from animals already captured for other 
permitted procedures. This is part of an ongoing study of Antarctic fur 
seals by the U.S. Antarctic Marine Living Resources (AMLR) Program.

LOCATION: Cape Shirreff, Livingston Island (ASPA #149), the South 
Shetland Islands, Antarctic Peninsula.

DATES: January 10, 2000-April 1, 2001.

Joyce Jatko,
Acting Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-2925 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          10,535
<SECURITIES>                                     4,795
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,847
<PP&E>                                          55,596
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,811
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,332
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            53
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,931
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,604
<SALES>                                         90,045
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,850
<CGS>                                           71,021
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,880
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,477
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,403
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,403
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2


 


ATRINSIC, INC.


 


65 Atlantic Avenue


Boston, Massachusetts 02110


 


September 3, 2015


Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd.


777 Third Avenue, 30th Floor


New York, NY 10017


Attn.: Mr. Yoav Roth


 


Re: 2nd Amendment to First
Amended and Restated Security Agreement


 


Dear Mr. Roth:


 


Reference is made to the incremental $25,000.00
loan from Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. to Atrinsic, Inc. being funded today which will be evidenced by a Convertible Promissory
Note of even date herewith. We hereby confirm that “Notes” as defined in the First Amended and Restated Security Agreement
dated December 18, 2014, as amended by the Letter Agreement dated May 15, 2015, shall be further amended to include all of the
notes described on Exhibit A hereto.


 


Except as modified hereby, the First Amended
and Restated Security Agreement dated December 18, 2014 shall remain in full force and effect.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	/s/ Edward Gildea
	 	Edward Gildea,
	 	President


 


Agreed to and Accepted:


 


	Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd.	 
	 	 
	By:   	/s/ Yoav Roth	 
	 	Yoav Roth, Authorized Signatory	 


 




     


     


    

  


Exhibit A


 


Notes Covered by First Amended and Restated
Security Agreement


by and among


Atrinsic, Inc., Iroquois Master Fund
LTD and Hudson Bay Master Fund LTD


  


	Note Date	 	Holder	 	Note Amount	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	2/11/2014	 	Hudson Bay Master Fund LTD	 	$	87,500.00	 
	2/11/2014	 	Iroquois Master Fund LTD	 	$	87,500.00	 
	8/15/2014	 	Hudson Bay Master Fund LTD	 	$	45,000.00	 
	8/15/2014	 	Iroquois Master Fund LTD	 	$	45,000.00	 
	12/18/2014	 	Hudson Bay Master Fund LTD	 	$	75,000.00	 
	12/18/2014	 	Iroquois Master Fund LTD	 	$	75,000.00	 
	5/15/2015	 	Hudson Bay Master Fund LTD	 	$	50,000.00	 
	5/15/2015	 	Iroquois Master Fund LTD	 	$	50,000.00	 
	9/3/2015	 	Hudson Bay Master Fund LTD	 	$	25,000.00	 
	9/3/2015	 	Iroquois Master Fund LTD	 	$	25,000.00
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE

SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

 

Pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of NeoPharm, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does herebycertify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “10-Q Report”) that:

 

(1)                                  the 10-Q Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the 10-Q Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 14, 2003 | /s/ Lawrence A. Kenyon  |   |
|-------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                                | Lawrence A. Kenyon,     |
|                                | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
# Sheet3

# image1.png