alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION of CFO PURSUANT TO

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period from January 6, 2016
(Commencement of Operations) through December 31, 2016 (the Report) of FS Investment Corporation IV (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Edward T. Gallivan, Jr.,
the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 10, 2017



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ EDWARD T. GALLIVAN, JR.
|Edward T. Gallivan, Jr.    
|Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE> 1                                                EXHIBIT 11.

MUSTANG SOFTWARE, INC.

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(In thousands, except earnings per share) (Unaudited)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>

                                                        Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended
                                                           June 30,              June 30, 
                                                        1995       1996     1995       1996
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding     3,356      3,363    2,731      3,361 
Common stock equivlents from outstanding stock options       0          0        0          0
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average common and common stock equivalents outstanding  3,356      3,363    2,731      3,361
==============================================================================================
Net Income                                               $(117)    $ (649)  $ (106)   $(1,300)  	
==============================================================================================
Earnings per share (1)                                   $(.03)    $ (.19)  $ (.04)   $  (.39) 
==============================================================================================
</TABLE>

(1) Fully diluted earnings per share have not been presented because the effects
are not material.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ASUNCION AHUMADA, §

§

 Plaintiff, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-1081-K

§

HERNANDEZ INDUSTRIAL §

SOLUTIONS INC. and CESAR §

HERNANDEZ, §

§

 Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this 

case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge dated December 29, 2022, the Court finds that the Findings and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the 

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. 

SO ORDERED.

Signed January 19th, 2023.

 _____________________________________

 ED KINKEADE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01081-K Document 17 Filed 01/19/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 68
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3497 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the dollar limitation 

on the exclusion for employer-provided dependent care assistance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2013 

Ms. DELAURO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the dollar limitation on the exclusion for employer-provided dependent care assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Care Flex Spend5 ing Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DOLLAR LIMITATION ON EXCLUSION 

7 FOR EMPLOYER-PROVIDED DEPENDENT 

8 CARE ASSISTANCE. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

10 129(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amendVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:04 Nov 19, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3497.IH H3497

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3497 IH

1 ed by striking ‘‘shall not exceed’’ and all that follows and 

2 inserting the following: ‘‘shall not exceed— 

3 ‘‘(i) in the case of a taxpayer whose 

4 modified adjusted gross income for such 

5 taxable year is less than $100,000 (twice 

6 such amount in the case of a joint return), 

7 $10,000 (half such amount in the case of 

8 a separate return by a married individual), 

9 and 

10 ‘‘(ii) in any other case, $5,000 (half 

11 such amount in the case of a separate re12 turn by a married individual).’’. 

13 (b) MODIFIED ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME.—Para14 graph (2) of section 129(a) of such Code is amended by 

15 adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

16 ‘‘(D) MODIFIED ADJUSTED GROSS IN17 COME.—For purposes of this paragraph, the 

18 term ‘modified adjusted gross income’ means 

19 the adjusted gross income of the taxpayer for 

20 the taxable year increased by any amount ex21 cluded from gross income under section 911, 

22 931, or 933.’’. 

23 (c) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Paragraph (2) of sec24 tion 129(a) of such Code, as amended by subsection (b), 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3497 IH

1 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub2 paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(E) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In the 

4 case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar 

5 year after 2014, each dollar amount contained 

6 in subparagraph (A) shall be increased by an 

7 amount equal to— 

8 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

9 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de10 termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal11 endar year in which the taxable year be12 gins, determined by substituting ‘calendar 

13 year 2013’ for ‘calendar year 1992’ in sub14 paragraph (B) thereof. 

15 Any increase determined under the preceding 

16 sentence shall be rounded to the nearest mul17 tiple of $50.’’. 

18 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

20 December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

TARA FARRELL, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NEW MILLENIUM CONCEPTS, LTD.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-00728-M

ORDER

Having reviewed the parties’ “Joint Report re: Class Certification” (ECF No. 72), the 

Court will proceed with the Motion to Strike (ECF No. 70) in due course and not delay the 

established deadlines on class certification. 

SO ORDERED.

November 13, 2023.

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00728-M Document 73 Filed 11/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1012
#### MONTGOMERY v. STATE.

No. 25405.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 24, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Homer L. Moss, County Atty., Wheeler, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

On March 23, 1951, judgment was rendered on the verdict of a jury finding -appellant guilty of' selling whiskey in a dry area with punishment assessed at 90 days in jail and a $250 fine.

According to the transcript, notice of appeal was given .on the same day and recognizance was entered into on April 2, 1951.

The transcript further shows that the term of court began on February 5, 1951, and ended April 2, 1951.

Under t'he provisions of Art. 760(5),. Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., then applicable, appellant had 30 days after final judgment in which to file a statement of facts which time does not appear to have been extended by order of the trial court.

The statement of facts was filed in the trial court on May 21, 1951, and therefore cannot be considered.

The proceeding's appear to be regular*' and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         November 8, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                     

*Contact Person:*                         Michele C. Hindi-Alexander, PhD., Scientific Review Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4188, MSC 7848, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-3554.                     

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle. 

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: November 8, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-29432 Filed 11-16-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN VLASICH,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JESUS JUAREZ; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-15974

D.C. No. 1:05-cv-01615-LJO-GSA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2012** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Steven Vlasich appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

FILED

JAN 02 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-15974

§ 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.

2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Vlasich

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants were

deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in discontinuing his Ritalin

medication. See id. at 1058 (prison officials act with deliberate indifference only if

they know of and disregard an excessive risk to inmate health; a difference of

opinion concerning the appropriate course of treatment does not amount to

deliberate indifference absent a showing that the course of treatment prescribed

was medically unacceptable).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Vlasich’s motion to

compel Dr. Fishback to produce copies of Vlasich’s letters because there was no

showing that the denial of the motion resulted in actual and substantial prejudice. 

See Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002) (district court’s “broad

discretion . . . to permit or deny discovery . . . will not be disturbed except upon the

clearest showing that denial of discovery results in actual and substantial

prejudice” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).
3 11-15974

We reject Vlasich’s contention that the district court erred by denying his

motion for copies and granting him leave to file only one copy of his opposition

without proof of service.

We do not consider on appeal materials that were not before the district

court.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

                                     BY THE
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of LION, Inc., a Washington
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each
of Randall D. Miles, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve Thomson, Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350), that to his knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


/s/ Randall D. Miles                        /s/ Steve Thomson
------------------------------------        ------------------------------------
Randall D. Miles                            Steve Thomson

November 15, 2004                           November 15, 2004
------------------------------------        ------------------------------------

                                       1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the Operating Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Terry L. Stevens, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the Operating
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ TERRY L. STEVENS                                             
|Terry L. Stevens                                                 
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
|October 6, 2006
H. Con. Res. 299 Agreed to October 7, 1994

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the book entitled ‘‘Hispanic Americans in Congress’’,

prepared under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing,

shall be printed as a House document, with illustrations and suitable binding.

SEC. 2. In addition to the usual number, there shall be printed,

for the use of the Joint Committee on Printing, the lesser of—

(1) 25,000 copies of the document; or

(2) such number of copies of the document as does not

exceed a total production and printing cost of $110,000.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
ORDER – PAGE 1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

DANIEL P KELLY, JR, § 

 § 

 Plaintiff, § 

 § 

v. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-01412-N 

 § 

PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES LLC, § 

 § 

 Defendant. § 

ORDER REQUIRING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

 Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of this Court, 

and the Civil Justice Expense and Delay Reduction Plan for the Northern District of 

Texas, the Court issues this Order to facilitate early consideration of settlement and entry 

of a scheduling order under Rule 16(b). 

 1. The parties are directed to confer within 14 days of the date of this Order 

regarding the following matters, and report to the Court within 14 days after the 

conference the parties’ position: 

 a. a brief statement of the nature of the case and the contentions of the parties; 

 b. the status of settlement discussions (excluding any discussion of amounts); 

 c. possible joinder of additional parties; 

 d. any anticipated challenges to jurisdiction or venue; 

Case 3:22-cv-01412-N Document 12 Filed 09/19/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 34
ORDER – PAGE 2 

 e. date by which the case will be ready for trial and estimated length of trial; 

 f. the desirability of ADR, and the timing for ADR; and 

 g. any objections to disclosure under Rule 26(a)(1). 

 2. The parties are directed to hold the conference required by Rule 26(f) 

within 14 days of the date of this Order and report to the Court as required by that Rule. 

 3. The parties’ Rule 26(f) report does not need to include suggested discovery 

deadlines. The Court’s scheduling order will include default scheduling deadlines. The 

scheduling order provides that the parties are free to alter those deadlines by written 

agreement, to conform to any agreed discovery plan under Rule 26(f) or otherwise, 

without the necessity of motion or order. 

 4. The reports required by paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Order should be 

contained in a single document. Upon receipt of that report, the Court will enter a 

scheduling order without the necessity of a scheduling conference with the Court, unless 

otherwise ordered. Requests for extension of the deadlines contained in this Order are 

unlikely to be granted due to the time constraints of Rule 16(b). 

Signed September 19, 2022. 

David C. Godbey 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 3:22-cv-01412-N Document 12 Filed 09/19/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 35
| | Re: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2015-NXS1
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"),
the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby
certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):





(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and
of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and



(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells
Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.







February 27, 2017































Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**JOHN T. CRAMER,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 64 WM 2014** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 21 st**  **day of October, 2014, the Application for Leave to F ile** 

**Original Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is** DENIED

**.**
U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 20, 2015

CONTACT: Treasury Public Affairs (202) 622-2960

FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 20, 2015

WASHINGTON – Secretary Lew today convened a meeting of the Financial Stability Oversight 

Council (Council) in an executive session by telephone. 

During the meeting, the Council discussed its forthcoming 2015 annual report, which will be 

published later this spring. The Council discussed current risks and potential emerging threats 

to financial stability, as well as recommendations, that may be addressed in the report. 

Additional information regarding the Council is available at www.fsoc.gov. 

###