alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Notes on the Data 207

Notes on the Data

Except as otherwise indicated, data cited in this report is as of July 6, 2012.

Glossary of Certain Government Data Sources

Bank Holding Company Performance Report (BHCPR): Report of financial information produced for select 

top-tier bank holding companies and published by the Federal Reserve.

Flow of Funds: Data release compiled and published by the Federal Reserve.

FR 2004: Report of market activity for primary dealers in U.S. government securities published by the 

Federal Reserve.

FR Y-9C: Consolidated financial statement for domestic bank holding companies published by the 

Federal Reserve.

SLOOS: Survey of senior loan officers on bank lending practices published by the Federal Reserve Board.

Academic Papers Cited in This Report

Copeland, Adam M., Antoine Martin, and Michael Walker. “The Tri-Party Repo Market before the 2010 

Reforms,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, 2010, No. 477.

Bech, Morten L., Antoine Martin, and James McAndrews. “Settlement Liquidity and Monetary Policy 

Implementation—Lessons from the Financial Crisis,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review 18, 

March 2012, No. 1.

Other 

Bloomberg data: © 2012 Bloomberg Finance L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission. 

Certain data was obtained through Haver Analytics. 

iMoneyNet data made available for use by iMoneyNet subscribers and press, all others please contact 

iMoneyNet for subscription information.

Inside Mortgage Finance, 2012 Mortgage Statistical Annual Copyright 2012. www.insidemortgagefinance.com.

® Markit makes no warranty, expressed or implied, as to accuracy, completeness or timeliness, or as to the 

results to be obtained by recipients of the products and services described herein, and shall not in any way be 

liable for any inaccuracies, errors or omissions herein. 

© 2012, Markit Group Limited. All rights reserved. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, reproduction or 

dissemination, in full or in part, in any media or by any means, without the prior written permission of Markit 

Group Limited is strictly prohibited.

Moody’s data provided by Moody’s Investors Service.

The Risk Management Association’s Aggregate Data Survey (2000–2012).
#### In the Matter of the Construction of the Will of Francesco Ambrosio, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,

March 18, 1958.

*639
      *Francis J. Mangravite*for petitioner.

*Klores & Klores*for Lena Iovino, respondent.

Maximilian Moss, S.

The executrix seeks construction of articles “ Third ”, “ Fourth ” and “ Fifth ” of the will; and a determination that by reason of the failure of respondents to conform with alleged conditions precedent therein, that they forfeited their respective devises. By the terms of the first article of the will, testator acknowledged an indebtedness of $2,100 to a named daughter which he directed to be paid as indicated in the following two articles. In the second, article, testator made a specific devise of a parcel of real property to two named daughters “ share and share alike ” except that one of the named daughters was required to pay out of her share $1,000 “ toward the discharge of the obligation ” recited in the preceding article. Article “Third” devises a second parcel of real property to two other named daughters, one of whom is the daughter named in the first article, except that “ that each shall pay out of her share the sum of $550 ” toward the acknowledged obligation recited in the first article. In the fourth article a bequest of $2,000 is made to a daughter with a direction “ that said bequest lie made a lien upon the real estate I may be possessed of” which consisted only of the two properties referred to in the preceding paragraphs. By article “ Fifth ” after the payment of my debts and the bequest to Rose Scelfo, as aforesaid ” testator devised and bequeathed all his estate to his said daughter.

The court construes the above-mentioned articles as follows: That the respective payments to be made by the devisees in articles “ Second ” and “ Third ” do not precede the vesting of the estates devised; and that it was the intent of the testator to have the devisees make the required payments *after*taking possession. The conditions are held to be conditions subsequent. *(Fox*v. *Phelps,*17 Wend. 393, affd. 20 Wend. 437; *Loder*v. *Hatfield,*71 N. Y. 92; *Smith*v. *Smith,*48 Hun 617; *Hutchins*v. *Hutchins,*18 Misc. 633; *Irwin*v. *Teller,*115 App. Div. 17.) Liens in favor of the claimant were created against the testator’s real estate described in articles “ Second ” and “ Third ” which constitute the primary fund for the satisfaction of the bequests *640
      *(Van Rensselaer*v. *Van Rensselaer,*113 N. Y. 207, 212; *Conkling*v. *Weatherwax,*173 N. Y. 43; *Matter of Nicolino,*120 N. Y. S. 2d 613). The liens may be enforced against the properties involved *(Redfield*v. *Redfield,*126 N. Y. 466) which procedurally may be enforced in the manner prescribed under article 13 of the Surrogate’s Court Act *(Brennan*v. *Adler,*190 App. Div. 589, 593).

Settle decree on notice.
#### James Hazlitt, Respondent, *v.*Francis R. Bedient, Appellant.

County Court, Schuyler County,

March 25, 1958.

*Liston F. Coon*for appellant.

*Henry Valent*for respondent.

*284Lafayette W. Argetsinger, Jr., J.

This appeal is based on the fact that one of the jurors serving in this case was, at the time of trial, not a citizen of Schuyler County but was a citizen of Yates County and therefore not legally qualified to serve as a juror.

The return of the Justices’ Court and the pleadings and briefs of counsel and the legal authorities referred to therein have been examined by me.

The case of *People ex rel. Ostwald*v. *Craver*(272 App. Div. 181), cited by counsel for the appellant, involves a similar situation where the defendant was convicted of a criminal offense and the District Attorney, upon later discovering that one of the jurymen was not a citizen of the United States, moved to set aside the verdict, which motion was granted. The court held that, since the conviction was set aside, the defendant could not be tried again for the same offense but, in so doing, stated that relator’s conviction was not illegal and should not have been set aside. 'With respect to this question the court, on page 183, has the following to say: “An objection to the qualification of a juror is available only upon a challenge. It must be taken when the juror appears and before he is sworn (Code Crim. Pro., § 369). The Constitution does not prescribe the qualifications of jurors. It guarantees the right of trial by jury, but the method of selecting persons deemed qualified to act as jurors is left to the Legislature *(People*v. *Cosmo,*205 N. Y. 91). The Legislature has prescribed the qualifications of a juror, and citizenship is one of these (Judiciary Law, § 502). The lack of such a technical qualification, however, may be waived, either with knowledge or by failure to make an inquiry when the juror is called and before he is sworn *(People*v. *Cosmo,*supra;*Kohl*v. *Lehlback,*160 U. S. 293; *United States*v. *Gale,*109 U. S. 65; *United States*v. *Rosenstein,*34 F. 2d 630; *People*v. *Thayer,*132 App. Div. 593).”

It is to be noted that this is a decision by the Appellate Division of the Third Department in a criminal case where the verdict must be unanimous. In a civil action, such as the appeal herein, the verdict need not be unanimous but only five out of six jurors would be required to render a verdict. In the absence of any definite showing of prejudice to the appellant, which is the situation here, the only fair construction, in my opinion, is that the money judgment in the lower court must be and hereby is, affirmed and the appeal is dismissed.

Counsel for the plaintiff-respondent will prepare an order accordingly.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MERRICK GARLAND, in his official 

capacity as Attorney General of the United 

States; et al., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00691-O 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE IN EXCESS OF PAGE LIMIT 

 Before the Court is a Motion for Leave to File in Excess of Page Limits by Plaintiffs 

Jennifer VanDerStok; Michael G. Andren; Tactical Machining, LLC; and Firearms Policy 

Coalition, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”). Defendants do not oppose the Motion. 

 Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ unopposed Motion for Leave to File in Excess of Page 

Limit, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs are permitted to file their Reply Brief in Support of 

their Motion for Preliminary Injunction, not to exceed _____ pages. 

 

Signed this _______________, 2022. 

 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE REED O’CONNOR 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 49-1 Filed 08/31/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 662
H. J. Res. 131

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

Joint Resolution

Designating December 7 of each year as ‘‘National Pearl Harbor Remembrance

Day’’.

Whereas, on December 7, 1941, the Imperial Japanese Navy and

Air Force attacked units of the armed forces of the United States

stationed at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii;

Whereas more than 2,000 citizens of the United States were killed

and more than 1,000 citizens of the United States were wounded

in the attack on Pearl Harbor;

Whereas the attack on Pearl Harbor marked the entry of the

United States into World War II;

Whereas the veterans of World War II and all other people of

the United States commemorate December 7 in remembrance

of the attack on Pearl Harbor; and

Whereas commemoration of the attack on Pearl Harbor will instill

in all people of the United States a greater understanding and

appreciation of the selfless sacrifice of the individuals who served

in the armed forces of the United States during World War

II: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That December

7 of each year is designated as ‘‘National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day’’ and the President is authorized and requested—

(1) to issue annually a proclamation calling on the people

of the United States to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities; and

(2) to urge all Federal agencies, and interested organizations, groups, and individuals, to fly the flag of the United
H. J. Res. 131—2

States at halfstaff each December 7 in honor of the individuals

who died as a result of their service at Pearl Harbor.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Coast Guard 

          - 33 CFR Part 117 
          - [CGD07-00-112] 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice of temporary deviation from regulations. 

# SUMMARY:

The Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District, has approved a temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the Stickney Point Drawbridge (SR 72) across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 68.6, Sarasota, Sarasota County, Florida. This deviation allows the drawbridge owner to provide single leaf openings for vessel traffic. This temporary deviation is required November 20, 2000 from 8 a.m. until 4 p.m., to allow the bridge owner to safely complete maintenance to the drawbridge. 

# DATES:

This deviation is effective on November 20, 2000 from 8 a.m. until 4 p.m. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Barry Dragon, Chief, Operations Section, Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge Section at (305) 415-6743. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Stickney Point Drawbridge (SR 72) across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Sarasota, FL has a vertical clearance of 18 feet above mean high water (MHW) measured at the center in the closed position. On October 30, 2000 the owner, requested a deviation from the current operating regulation in 33 CFR 117.35 which requires the drawbridge to open promptly and fully when a request to open is given. This temporary deviation was requested to allow necessary maintenance to the drawbridge in a critical time sensitive manner. 

The District Commander has granted a temporary deviation from the operating requirements listed in 33 CFR 117.35 for the purpose of maintenance of the drawbridge. Under this deviation, the Stickney Point Drawbridge (SR 72) need only provide single leaf openings. The deviation is effective on November 20, 2000 from 8 a.m. until 4 p.m. 

Dated: November 7, 2000. 

G.E. Shapley, 

Chief, Bridge Administration, Seventh Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 00-29102 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

18 June 2004

(2004/C 162/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
Exhibit 10.1


 


 


 


September 8, 2015


 


Brian M. Storms


67 Roxiticus Road


Far Hills, NJ 07931


 


Re: Resignation


 


Dear Brian:


 


It is my understanding that you intend to resign as an employee
of Liquid Holdings Group, Inc. (“Liquid”) and forego the remaining compensation that would be owed to you under
the Transition Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2015, between you and Liquid (the “Transition Agreement”), as
well as your remaining grant of 519,474 restricted stock units under Liquid’s incentive compensation plan. In consideration
therefor, Liquid will (1) pay you $125,000, subject to standard employment-tax withholding, upon your resignation as an employee,
which resignation will also serve as the end of the “Transition Period” under the Transition Agreement; and (2) terminate
the lock-up set forth in Section 6 of the Transition Agreement. Liquid will also confirm that Article VI of our Bylaws, Indemnification
and Advancement of Expenses, remains applicable to you in accordance with its terms.


 


If this offer is acceptable to you, please countersign below
and return it to me. This letter agreement will become effective upon your resignation from Liquid. We intend to disclose your
resignation, as well as the terms of this letter, in a Current Report on Form 8-K, which we expect will have no additional disclosures
in it.


 


Note that the release of the lock-up provisions of the Transition
Agreement do not serve to remove any restrictions on trading that may be applicable to you under the securities laws.


 


Thank you for your service and dedication to Liquid over the
last two years. We wish you all the very best in your future endeavors.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ Peter R. Kent


 


Peter R. Kent

Chief Executive Officer

Liquid Holdings Group, Inc.


 


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


 


/s/ Brian M. Storms


 


Brian M. Storms


 










	Liquid Holdings Group, Inc.	 
	111 River Street, Ste. 1204	 
	Hoboken, NJ 07030	www.liquidholdings.com
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 177

Authorizing the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity to establish a memorial to Martin

Luther King, Jr. in the District of Columbia or its environs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 7, 1993

Mr. DIXON (for himself, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. JACOBS, Mrs. MINK, Mr.

TOWNS, and Ms. WATERS) introduced the following joint resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

JOINT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity to establish a

memorial to Martin Luther King, Jr. in the District

of Columbia or its environs.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity

5 is authorized to establish a memorial on Federal land in

6 the District of Columbia or its environs to honor Martin

7 Luther King, Jr.
2

•HJ 177 IH

1 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMO2 RATIVE WORKS.—The establishment of the memorial shall

3 be in accordance with the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide

4 standards for placement of commemorative works on cer5 tain Federal lands in the District of Columbia and its en6 virons, and for other purposes’’ approved November 14,

7 1986 (40 U.S.C. 1001, et seq.).

8 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.

9 The Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity shall be solely re10 sponsible for acceptance of contributions for, and payment

11 of the expenses of, the establishment of the memorial. No

12 Federal funds may be used to pay any expense of the es13 tablishment of the memorial.

14 SEC. 3. DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS.

15 If, upon payment of all expenses of the establishment

16 of the memorial (including the maintenance and preserva17 tion amount provided for in section 8(b) of the Act re18 ferred to in section 1(b)), or upon expiration of the author19 ity for the memorial under section 10(b) of that Act, there

20 remains a balance of funds received for the establishment

21 of the memorial, the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity shall

22 transmit the amount of the balance to the Secretary of

23 the Treasury for deposit in the account provided for in

24 section 8(b)(1) of that Act.

Æ
Exhibit
12.2



CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



I,
Henry Williams, certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Pyxis Tankers Inc.; and



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.



Date:
June 6, 2019





|/s/
    Henry Williams                                                  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Henry Williams                                                          | 
|Chief Financial
    Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) |
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------------X

RUDERSDAL, EOOD, et al., : 

: 18-cv-11072 (GHW) (RWL)

: 19-cv-01762 (GHW) (RWL)

Plaintiffs, :

: ORDER

- against - :

:

PHILIP ROBERT HARRIS, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

---------------------------------------------------------------X

ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, United States Magistrate Judge.

With the dust having settled after initial motion practice, counsel for Plaintiffs and

any remaining Defendants shall meet and confer about, and submit to the Court by May 

16, 2022, a proposed case management and scheduling order for the remainder of the 

case.

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: May 2, 2022

New York, New York

Copies transmitted to all counsel of record. 

5/2/2022

Case 3:22-cv-01219-X Document 429 Filed 05/02/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 26763
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 205 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.205
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                            Joint Resolution

  
 
  Designating the week beginning October 31, 1993, as ``National Health 
Information

                           Management Week''.

Whereas accurate, timely, and complete medical records and related 
  health information are vital in planning and providing for quality 
  health care for the people of the United States;
Whereas such records and information are vital to providing health care 
  to an individual beginning at the birth of the individual and 
  continuing throughout the life of the individual;
Whereas public concern about the quality, appropriateness, and 
  effectiveness of health care is escalating;
Whereas specific skills in evaluating and reporting the results of 
  health care are required to provide public accountability;
Whereas equitable third-party reimbursement for health care is dependent 
  on health information that is collected, analyzed, classified, 
  verified, and disseminated;
Whereas public awareness of patient rights, including the right of a 
  patient to access the patient's own medical information, is 
  increasing;
Whereas the needs and requirements for health information of the health 
  care industry and the use of the information by the industry are 
  changing rapidly;
Whereas the rate of such changes will continue to increase as new health 
  care technology is used and new health care reform policies are 
  promulgated;
Whereas the 35,000 members of the American Health Information Management 
  Association are the health information leaders of the United States; 
  and
Whereas such members have demonstrated commitment to, and expertise in, 
  health information management: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week beginning October 
31, 1993, is designated as ``National Health Information Management 
Week'', and the President is authorized and requested to issue a 
proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe the 
week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.







                                Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                             Vice President of the United States and    
                                                President of the Senate.`