alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A Federal Advisory Committee for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Research and Development 

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING 

DRAFT AGENDA 

Wednesday, August 25, 2010 

1:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time 

CONFERENCE CALL 

Participation by Teleconference Only 

Contact DFO (202-564-9945; susanke.greg@epa.gov) 

for Teleconference Number 

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

1:00 p.m. – 1:10 p.m. Welcome and Introductions Dr. Gary Sayler, 

- Overview of Agenda Chair, Executive Committee 

1:10 p.m. – 1:15 p.m. BOSC DFO Remarks Mr. Greg Susanke, 

 Designated Federal Officer, 

 Office of Research and 

 Development 

 

1:15 p.m. – 1:45 p.m. BOSC Response to Safe Pesticides/ Dr. Barry Ryan 

 Safe Products Mid-Cycle Progress Executive Committee 

 Report 

1:45 p.m. – 2:15 p.m. BOSC Response to Human Health Dr. Gary Sayler 

 Risk Assessment Mid-Cycle Progress Chair, Executive Committee 

 Report 

2:15 p.m. – 2:45 p.m. BOSC Response to ORD Dr. Katherine von Stackelberg, 

 Nanomaterial Workshop Report Decision Analysis Workgroup 

 Chair, Executive Committee 

 

 2:45 p.m. – 2:55 p.m. Public Comment 

 2:55 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. Future Business Dr. Gary Sayler, 

 Chair, Executive Committee 

 

 3:00 p.m. Adjourn
# C_2023193EN.01000601.xml

| 1.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/6

---

State aid – Decision to raise no objections

(2023/C 193/05)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:

| Date of adoption of the decision | 8 February 2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Case No | 89918 |
| Decision No | 005/23/COL |
| EFTA State | Liechtenstein |
| Region | |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Temporary Crisis Framework – Support scheme for energy intensive enterprises due to an exceptionally severe increase in electricity prices |
| Legal basis | Act of 18 December 1997 on the Financing of Economic Support measures (‘Economic Support Act’), and Government Guidelines on Subsidies of Electricity Costs of Energy-intensive Businesses for the Year 2023 of 13 December 2022 |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Support energy intensive undertakings for electricity costs, due to the severe increase in energy prices resulting from Russia’s aggression towards Ukraine |
| Form of aid | Grants |
| Budget | CHF 4 million |
| Intensity | N.A |
| Duration | Aid under the measure can be granted in support of electricity costs incurred in 2023. Aid will be granted no later than 31 December 2023. |
| Economic sectors | All sectors, except real estate businesses |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Amt für Volkswirtschaft |
| Postfach 684 |
| 9490 Vaduz |
| LIECHTENSTEIN |

Date of adoption of the decision

8 February 2023

Case No

89918

Decision No

005/23/COL

EFTA State

Liechtenstein

Region

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Temporary Crisis Framework – Support scheme for energy intensive enterprises due to an exceptionally severe increase in electricity prices

Legal basis

Act of 18 December 1997 on the Financing of Economic Support measures (‘Economic Support Act’), and Government Guidelines on Subsidies of Electricity Costs of Energy-intensive Businesses for the Year 2023 of 13 December 2022

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Support energy intensive undertakings for electricity costs, due to the severe increase in energy prices resulting from Russia’s aggression towards Ukraine

Form of aid

Grants

Budget

CHF 4 million

Intensity

N.A

Duration

Aid under the measure can be granted in support of electricity costs incurred in 2023. Aid will be granted no later than 31 December 2023.

Economic sectors

All sectors, except real estate businesses

Name and address of the granting authority

Amt für Volkswirtschaft

Postfach 684

9490 Vaduz

LIECHTENSTEIN

Other information

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/

---
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28861]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Advisory Panel to Assess the Capabilities for 
Domestic Response to Terrorist Attacks Involving Weapons of Mass 
Destruction

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the 
next meeting of the Panel to Assess the Capabilities for Domestic 
Response to Terrorist Attacks Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction. 
Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act. (Pub. L. 92-463).

DATES: November 27 and 28, 2000.

ADDRESSES: RAND, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050.

PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND AGENDA: Panel to Assess the Capabilities for 
Domestic Response to Terrorist Attacks Involving Weapons of Mass 
Destruction will meet from 8:30 a.m. until 5:30 p.m. on November 27, 
2000 and from 8:30 a.m. until 3:30 p.m. on November 28, 2000. The 
meeting will include classified briefings on cyber terrorism and 
therefore portions of the meeting will be closed to the public. Time 
will be allocated for public comments by individuals or organizations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RAND provides information about this 
Panel on its web site at http://www.rand.org/organization/nsrd/terrpanel; it can also be reached at (703) 413-1100 extension 5282. 
Public comment presentations will be limited to two minutes each and 
must be provided in writing prior to the meeting. Mail written 
presentations and requests to register to attend the open public 
session to: Priscilla Schlegel, RAND, 1200 South Hayes Street, 
Arlington, VA 22202-5050. Public seating for this meeting is limited, 
and is available on a first-come, first-served basis.

    Dated: November 6, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-28861 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
# Official Journal C 323A/1 Oc

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 323A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 581 October 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 323A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 581 October 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority |
| 2015/C 323A/1 | Staff vacancies — Ref. 1518TAAD14 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority

2015/C 323A/1

Staff vacancies — Ref. 1518TAAD14

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### DORSEY v. STATE.

No. 21400.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 29, 1941.

Calloway Huffalcer, of Tahoka, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is theft of one cow and calf. The punishment assessed is confinement *262in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

The evidence adduced by the State, briefly stated, shows that about the 1st day of November, 1938, E. E. Hinshaw loaned to Homer Durham a cow to milk and take care of; as well as her calf. This cow and calf disappeared from the premises of Durham in the town of Gail ,in Borden County op the night of December j 19, 1938. On the next day the cow was recovered in Slaton, Lubbock County, where appellant had sold her to P. T. Gentry, .giving his name as E. A. Phillips and his residence .at Wilson. Hinshaw and Durham testified that the cow was taken without the consent of each of them.

Appellant testified that he and Durham ■engaged in a game of poker and after winning all of Durham’s money he (Durham) staked his cow on the game and appellant won her; that Durham asked him not to sell the cow in his own name as he did not want his wife to know that he had lost the cow in a poker game. The State proved that appellant had theretofore, in three separate and distinct cases, been convicted for theft of cattle.

By Bill of Exception No. 1 appellant complains of the introduction in evidence of the former judgments of conviction. The court qualified the bill and in his qualification states that on cross-examination appellant admitted that he had once been convicted theretofore and denied the other two; that the appellant’s objection thereto was that the record thereof would be the best evidence, whereupon the records were produced without further objection. The bill, as thus qualified, fails to reflect any error.

Bill of Exception No. 2 is also qualified by the trial court, who states in his qualification thereof that the matter complained of therein was not objected to or called to his attention during the trial nor in appellant’s motion for a new trial; that the first time it was mentioned to him by the appellant’s attorney was long after the trial and after the court had adjourned. The bill, as qualified, was accepted by ap-> pellant and fails to reflect any error.

By Bill of Exception No. 5 appellant claims misconduct of the jury in that they arrived at a quotient verdict, but no evidence is brought forward to substantiate his contention. Hence the matter complained of is not properly before this court for review.

A careful examination of Bills of Exception Nos. 3, 4, 6 and 7 has convinced us that they fail to reflect any reversible error.

Finding no reversible error in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The, foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 285 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 285

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make technical corrections in 
                       the enrollment of S. 2182.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 17, 1994

 Mr. Dellums submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make technical corrections in 
                       the enrollment of S. 2182.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (S. 2182) to authorize 
appropriations for fiscal year 1995 for military activities of the 
Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense 
programs of the Department of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths 
for such fiscal year for the Armed Forces, and for other purposes, the 
Secretary of the Senate shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In section 3136, strike out ``20 percent'' and insert 
        in lieu thereof ``80 percent''.
            (2) Amend the title so as to read; ``An Act to authorize 
        appropriations for fiscal year 1995 for military activities of 
        the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for 
        defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe 
        personnel strengths for such fiscal year for the Armed Forces, 
        and for other purposes.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK, et al.,

 Plaintiffs, Case No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

 v.

MERRICK GARLAND, in his official 

capacity as Attorney General of the United 

States, et al., 

 Defendants.

SUPPLEMENT TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF THE 

SCOPE OF THE COURT’S PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION WITH RESPECT TO 

TACTICAL MACHINING’S PENDING CLASSIFICATION REQUEST

In this Supplement to Defendants’ Motion for Clarification filed on September 15, 2022, ECF 

No. 71, Defendants hereby advise that ATF will be able to complete its classification of the sample 

that Tactical Machining, LLC, has submitted to ATF within two business days of receiving 

clarification from the Court that the Preliminary Injunction does not prohibit ATF from proceeding

with the classification. ATF’s ability to complete this classification quickly, and the potential for the 

classification to affect the scope and nature of this case, underscore that this Court should wait to rule 

on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Expand the Preliminary Injunction until after the Court clarifies that the 

Preliminary Injunction does not prohibit ATF from completing its classification and ATF completes 

its classification. 

DATED: September 16, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

BRIAN M. BOYNTON

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 73 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 979
2 

ALEXANDER K. HAAS

Director, Federal Programs Branch

LESLEY FARBY

Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch

/s/ Daniel Riess 

DANIEL RIESS

MARTIN M. TOMLINSON

TAISA M. GOODNATURE

JEREMY S.B. NEWMAN

Trial Attorneys

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch

U.S. Department of Justice

1100 L Street, NW

Washington, DC 20005

Phone: (202) 353-4556

Email: martin.m.tomlinson@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 73 Filed 09/16/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 980
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On September 16, 2022, I electronically submitted the foregoing document with the clerk of 

court for the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, using the electronic case filing system 

of the court. I hereby certify that I have served all parties electronically or by another manner 

authorized by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2).

/s/ Daniel Riess 

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 73 Filed 09/16/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 981
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Dean Witter Diversified Futures Fund Limited Partnership and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      89,056,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  335,163<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              85,564,774<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                85,564,774<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,712,502<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,272,915
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,439,587
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,439,587
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,439,587
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $335,163.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized loss on open contracts of $3,826,696.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $1,960,990, accrued
management fee of $215,320, and administrative expenses payable
of $116,519.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $12,219,727,
net change in unrealized of $(5,428,635) and interest income of $1,921,410.
</FN>


</TABLE>
## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL A PPE ALS OF TEXAS

NO. P D-1565-14

CLINT WEL DON WILSON, App ellant

v.

THE S TATE O F TEXAS

ON AP P ELL ANT’S P ETIT ION F OR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

F ROM THE SI XTH COURT OF A P P EALS

F RANK LIN COUNTY

P E R C U R I A M . K

E A S L E R and H E R V E Y , JJ., dissent.

O R D E R

T h e p e t i t i o n f

o r d i s c r e t i o n a r y r e v i e w v i o l a t e s R u l e o f A p p e l l a t e P r o c e d u r e 9

. 4 ( i ) ( 2 ) ( D )

b e c a u s e t h e p e t i t i o n e x c e e d s t h e p r o p e r l e n g t h

.

T h e p e t i t i o n i s s t r u c k

. S e e R u l e o f A p p e l l a t e P r o c e d u r e 6 8

. 6

.

T h e p e t i t i o n e r m a y r e d r a w t h e p e t i t i o n

. T h e r e d r a w n p e t i t i o n a n d c o p i e s m u s t b e f i l e d

i n t h e C o u r t o f C r i m i n a l A p p e a l s w i t h i n t h i r t y d a y s a f t e r t h e d a t e o f t h i s o r d e r

.

F i l e d : M a r c h 1 8 , 2 0 1 5 D o N o t P u b l i s h
Case 2:22-cr-00040-Z-BR Document 50 Filed 11/21/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 112
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for ACE 

Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, 

Series 2006-OP2, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

3645 JULIA WALDENE ST. TRUST; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 19-16024 

D.C. No. 

2:17-cv-01565-JAD-VCF 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 21, 2022

**

San Francisco, California

Before: IKUTA and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and TAGLE,*** District Judge.

Having considered the parties’ supplemental briefs, we vacate the judgment 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Hilda G. Tagle, United States District Judge for the 

Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation.

FILED

APR 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

of the district court and remand for further proceedings to allow the district court to 

address in the first instance the relevance of U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Thunder Properties, 

Inc., 503 P.3d 299 (Nev. 2022), to this matter. The parties should also address any 

other arguments they may have, whether raised in the supplemental briefs or 

otherwise, to the district court in the first instance. 

VACATED AND REMANDED. Each party to bear its own costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>       5

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        Jun-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                           Jul-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             Sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                     7,377,000
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                324,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           8,804,000
<PP&E>                                     4,236,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               844,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            24,134,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3,564,000
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                     129,000
<OTHER-SE>                                20,441,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              24,134,000
<SALES>                                      318,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             318,000
<CGS>                                        188,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              4,649,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            22,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (4,541,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (4,541,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           32,502,000
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                              27,961,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .22







</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARTIN
INDUSTRIES, INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED JULY 1, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                               5
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,582
<ALLOWANCES>                                       663
<INVENTORY>                                     12,699
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,106
<PP&E>                                          27,086
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,282
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,930
<BONDS>                                          1,802
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,382
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,282
<SALES>                                         35,627
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,627
<CGS>                                           33,218
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,218
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,757
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    59
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,663)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,663)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,663)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.87)


</TABLE>