alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)





I, Steven C. McNeal, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Entergy New Orleans Storm Recovery Funding I, L.L.C. (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee.





---




Dated: March 28, 2022


By /s/ Steven C. McNeal


Name:  Steven C. McNeal


Title: Vice President and Treasurer


of Entergy New Orleans, LLC, as         Servicer


(Senior officer in charge of the    servicing function)
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Care Capital Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lori B. Wittman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: March 17,   2017                              |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                     |   |
| /s/ Lori B. Wittman                                      |   |
| Lori B. Wittman                                          |   |
| *Executive Vice President and   Chief Financial Officer* |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. 

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C28

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 25, 2016

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### LUTZ v. STATE.

No. 22841.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 3, 1944.

Grover C. Morris, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of aggravated assault. The punishment is assessed at a fine of $500.

It was charged, in substance, in the complaint and information that on or about the 14th day of December, 1943, Erwin Lutz, in Medina County, Texas, did in and upon Jacob Lutz commit an aggravated assault; the said Erwin Lutz then and there being a person of robust health and strength, and the said Jacob Lutz then and there being aged and decrepit. It will be noted from the allegation in the complaint and information that the State undertook to charge two phases of the offense under subdivision 4 of Article 1147, P.C.

In the case of Hallman v. State, 113 Tex.Cr.R. 100, 18 S.W.2d 652, this court held that the term “aged” in the statute is not sufficient to comply with the legal requirement that the offense be definitely defined before a conviction under it can be sustained. The opinion in that case seems to be predicated mainly upon Article 6, P.C., which declares a penal statute to be inoperative which is so indefinitely framed, or of such doubtful construction, that it cannot be understood, either from the language in which it is expressed, or from some other written law of the state. Consequently that phase of the offense charged is too uncertain and indefinite. Therefore, we have merely that phase of the offense left in the information which charges that the assault was committed upon a “decrepit” person. If the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction under that phase of the law, then the judgment of the *980trial court should be affirmed. Looking to the testimony adduced upon the trial, we find no evidence that the assaulted party was a “decrepit” person within the meaning of the term.

In the case of Hall v. State, 16 Tex.App. 6, 49 Am.Rep. 824, and also in Little v. State, 61 Tex.Cr.R. 197, 135 S.W. 119, 121, this court set forth a legal definition of the term “decrepit” in the following language: “We understand a decrepit person to mean one who is disabled, incapable, or incompetent, from either physical or mental weakness or defects, so as to render the individual comparatively helpless in a personal conflict with one possessed of ordinary health and strength.” See also 4 Tex.Jur. p. 856, § 22.

Having reached the conclusion that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction of aggravated assault under the allegations in the information, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the' Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### Ex parte REDDING.

No. 22905.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 31, 1944.

Rehearing Denied June 21, 1944.

H. H. Cooper, R. E. Underwood, Sr., and Clem Calhoun, all of Amarillo, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was charged by indictment with the offense of murder alleged to have been committed in Potter County, Texas, on or about the 6th day of April, 1944. He was arrested by the sheriff of said county and placed in jail. He immediately presented to the Judge of the District Court for the 47th Judicial District of Texas, an application for a writ of habeas corpus in which he averred that he was being illegally restrained of his liberty by the sheriff. The writ was issued as prayed for, *952and upon a hearing thereof, he was remanded to the custody of the sheriff without the benefit of bail. From said order and judgment he appealed to this court.

We have read the record before us with care and reached the conclusion that under the law and the facts, he is entitled to bail. In passing on the question of bail, it is important to keep in mind Section 11 of Article 1 of the Constitution of Texas, Vernon’s Ann.St. which provides:

> “All prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, unless for capital offences, when the proof is evident; but this provision shall not be so construed as to prevent bail after indictment found upon examination of the evidence, in such manner as may be prescribed by law.”

The word “evident” in the Constitution, has been construed to mean that the accused, with a cool and deliberate mind and formed design, did maliciously kill another and that a dispassionate jury would not only convict him but would also assess the death penalty.

In cases of this nature, it has long been the policy of this court to refrain from stating the facts at length or to express a conclusion thereon.

It.sometimes happens that the same evidence which the State introduces and relies on to show malice might be appropriated by the jury to indicate a killing in which the accused acted under the influence of sudden passion arising from adequate cause as defined in Art. 1257c, Vernon’s Ann.Tex. P.C. When such is the case, this court would be in no position to say that the jury would accept the evidence as showing malice instead of adequate cause, and, therefore, we are likewise in no position to say that such an accused should be denied bail. Believing the-facts in the record before us present such a situation, it is our conclusion that appellant is entitled to bail.

The judgment is reversed and bail is granted in the sum of $15,000, and that upon the execution of a bond in said sum, with good and sufficient sureties, appellant is ordered released from custody.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals, has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | CMBS Department

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C21 COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2015-C21

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

March 1, 2016

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 222 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

<DOC>

        H.Con.Res.222
                                         Agreed to June 21, 1994        

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Joint Committee on the Library is authorized to accept a bust 
of Raoul Wallenberg and to place the bust in an appropriate location in 
the Capitol, as determined by the Joint Committee on the Library.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
#### PRATER v. COOK et al.

No. 4025.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

Feb. 13, 1941.

McClellan Wassell, of Wink (A. T. Folsom, of Wink, of counsel), for appellant.

H. L. Roberson and G. C. Olsen, both of Kermit, for appellees.

WALTHALL, Justice.

This suit was brought to recover an alleged unpaid balance due on a note for $1,-000 made payable to appellant and signed by appellee A. A. Cook, with others. The case was tried to the court without a jury. All defendants other than A. A. Cook and Walton C. Creech were dismissed before judgment, and as to A. A. Cook judgment was rendered that appellant (plaintiff) take nothing by his suit. From that judgment appellant appeals.

A. A. Cook’s original answer to the suit was a general denial; his amended original answer consisted of special exceptions and general denial. The exceptions were overruled. On motion of appellant the court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The court’s findings of fact state that the $1,000 note upon which the suit was brought had payments, with the amounts and dates thereof, endorsed on the back of the note, but the payments were not sufficient to discharge the note.

Appellee Cook was permitted, over objection, to show that the $1,000 note sued upon was given appellant for money to be used in a service station business; that thereafter some of the defendants here sold the service station business to parties not parties to this suit, who assumed to pay the unpaid balance of the $1,000 note. It was not alleged or proved that appellant agreed to release A. A. Cook from liability on the note, nor is it alleged that appellant agreed to or did accept the purchasers of the service station business or other security in lieu of the unpaid balance on the note; nor is it alleged that the purchasers of the service station business executed a new note to appellant for the unpaid balance on the note; nor is it alleged that the new note was paid in full to appellant in discharge of the note sued on.

*213The point made by appellant, evidenced by bills of exceptions, is that the court admitted evidence of payment of the $1,-000 note other than payments endorsed on the note; in the absence of any issue tendered or pleading of payment.

A. A. Cook tendered a plea of non est factum, but the court made no findingi on the plea.

Evidently, under Article 2014, of the Revised Civil Statutes, it was error to admit evidence of payment in the absence of any such issue tendered in the pleadings.

No order as to Walton C. Creech'is made in the judgment. It leaves the judgment doubtful as being final.

The case is reversed and remanded.
Case 4:22-cr-00154-O Document 22 Filed 06/29/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 39
Case 4:22-cr-00154-O Document 22 Filed 06/29/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 40
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP97-249-001]

Take notice that on October 31, 2000, Viking Gas  Transmission Company (Viking)  tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First  Revised Volume No. 1,  the following  tariff sheets  to become effective November 1, 2000:

Third Revised Sheet No. 7

Third Revised Sheet No. 8

Third Revised Sheet No. 9

Viking states that these tariff sheets reflect the implementation of a new negotiated rate contact between Viking and Wisconsin Public Service. Viking requests an effective date of November 1, 2000 and accordingly requests waiver of the Commission's notice requirements.

Viking states that copies of this filing have been served on Viking's jurisdictional customers and to affected state regulatory commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or  385.211 of the Commission's  Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at ­http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-29194 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: December 18, 2014

CONTACT: Treasury Public Affairs (202) 622-2960

FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 18, 2014

WASHINGTON – Secretary Lew today convened a meeting of the Financial Stability Oversight 

Council (Council) in executive and open sessions at the Treasury Department. 

During the executive session, the Council reviewed its proposed Federal Register notice seeking 

public comment on potential risks to U.S. financial stability from asset management products 

and activities. 

The Council also continued its discussion of nonbank financial company designations under 

Section 113 of the Dodd-Frank Act. 

In addition, the Council received an update on recent international market developments. 

Finally, the Chairperson provided an update to the Council regarding staff work on nonbank 

financial company designations process changes. 

During the open session, the Council received an update from staff regarding two key areas of 

work from the Council’s 2014 annual report to Congress: cybersecurity and interest rate risk. 

The Council also heard a presentation from the Office of Financial Research about its recent 

annual report and the Financial Stability Monitor, which has been updated since it was first 

unveiled by the OFR in its 2013 annual report. 

Members of the Council then discussed the Council’s Federal Register notice seeking public 

comment on potential risks to U.S. financial stability from asset management products and 

activities, which identifies four areas on which to request further information: risks associated 

with liquidity and redemption, leverage, operational functions, and resolution. The Council then 

voted to release the Federal Register notice seeking public comment on these areas of potential 
risk in order to further engage with stakeholders and gather additional information for its review 

of asset management products and activities. 

Finally, the Council voted to approve the minutes of its previous meeting on November 3. 

Additional information regarding the Council and the minutes approved today are available at 

www.fsoc.gov. 

###
## - J"" SED STqrF'S, 2~ A yU a o z Ftir ~~o PROTECTION q~ PROZEG UNITEDSTATES ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANNARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498 OFFICE OF AIRANDRADIATION MEMORANDUM 

# MAR26 2010 SUBJECT: Emissions Modeling Data Files for the Final Light Duty Vehicle GHGRule FROM : Margaret Zawacki Assessment and Standards Division, Office ofTransportation and Air Quality Rich Masonand Marc Houyoux Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group, Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards TO : Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0472-DRAFT-11549 DATE: March 24, 2010 The purpose ofthis memorandumis to transmit emissions modeling data files which were used to prepare air quality modeling inventories for the final light duty vehicle greenhouse gas rule. The emissions modeling analyses are discussed in the Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory for Air Quality Modeling Technical Support Document . The air quality modeling analysis results are able to be replicated by using the data files provided here and the information in the Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory for Air Quality Modeling Technical Support Document . Following is a briefdescription ofthe information contained on the enclosed DVDs. County/SCC-level delimited summaries for criteria pollutants and (at least) select hazardous air pollutants (benzene, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, acrolein, 1,3-butadiene, methanol, naphthalene) by emissions modeling sector for the scenarios listed below . Some county-SCC summaryfiles include emissions for all HAPs supported by the multi-pollutant CMAQmodel . Onroad and nonroad mobile summaries are included by month using average day emissions and separately with annual totals. Point source inventories are also provided in the format for the Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions (SMOKE) modeling system . The point "ORL" format ofthese datasets can be found online at http ://www.smokemodel .org/version2.6/html/ch08s02s08 .html#d0e43807. 1) 2005 base 2) 2030 Reference 3) 2030 Control 

# MAR252010