alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CALVERY v. STATE.

No. 22803.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 15, 1944.

Alex P. Pope, of Tyler, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a penalty of Fifty Dollars on a charge of driving on a public highway while intoxicated.

The appeal is before us without bill of exception and without statement of facts. The procedure is regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 08250**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** 08250\08250_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 08250\08250_ Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 08250\08250_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook x 08250\08250_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08250\08250_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08250\08250_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08250\08250_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 08250\08250_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

08250\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08250_ aerialmap.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08250\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08250_Block_Diagram_D1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08250\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08250_Block_Diagram_D2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08250\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08250_Water_Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      32,370,000
<SECURITIES>                                12,421,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,710,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,053,000
<INVENTORY>                                  6,305,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            72,372,000
<PP&E>                                      10,178,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,614,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              78,279,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,664,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  71,606,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                78,279,000
<SALES>                                     13,936,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,936,000
<CGS>                                        6,005,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,668,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               607,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (551,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (788,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   178,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (966,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (966,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 131/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 131 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6414 April 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 131

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6414 April 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2021/C 131/01 | Position (EU) No 5/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Defence Fund and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1092Adopted by the Council on 16 March 2021 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 131/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 5/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Defence Fund and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1092 | 27 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2021/C 131/01

Position (EU) No 5/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Defence Fund and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1092Adopted by the Council on 16 March 2021 (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 131/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 5/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Defence Fund and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1092

27

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28639]



[[Page 66981]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-408-000]


Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C. Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

November 2, 2000.
    Take notice that October 27, 2000, Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C. 
(Ozark) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, the following pro forma revised tariff sheets, to be 
effective on a date to be determined by the Commission pursuant to 
Order No. 637.

First Revised Sheet No. 106
Original Sheet No. 106B

    Ozark also requested that it be permitted to withdraw the following 
pro forma tariff sheets previously filed in this proceeding:

First Revised Sheet No. 106
Original Sheet No. 106B

    Ozark states that the purpose of this filing is to amend its 
proposed penalty revenue crediting mechanism in accordance with the 
terms of the Offer of Settlement in its Section 4 general rate case 
which was filed on October 27, 2000 in Docket No. RP00-257-000. Ozark 
further states that the Settlement requires it to propose in this 
proceeding a penalty revenue crediting mechanism whereby monthly actual 
penalty revenues will be allocated to non-offending firm shippers in 
proportion to their monthly fixed cost contribution to Ozark's revenue 
requirements, shippers incurring a penalty during a particular month 
will not be eligible to receive an allocation of penalty revenues for 
that month and shippers will receive allocated monthly penalty credits 
through annual refunds.
    Ozark further states that it has served copies of this filing upon 
the company's jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions 
and all persons on the official service list for this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell. htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary
[FR Doc. 00-28639 Filed 11-07-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Ruben WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 25421.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 24, 1951.

Ross Hoffman, Brady, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Unlawfully selling whisky in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $250 and thirty days in jail.

The information in this case is subject to the same fatal defect as pointed out in Barnett v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 242 S.W.2d 885.

The judgment is reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Discussion on Sustainability 

Idaho Collateral Support Program 

May 25, 2017

Idaho Housing and Finance Association 
Participating Lenders
Number of Loans (by lender type)
Loan Volumes (by lender type)
Journey to Sustainability

• Obtained feedback from participating lenders 

before program changes implemented

• Incenting higher use on short term loans

– Pricing practices and amount of CSP

• Claw-back practices/Agency borrowings

• Leveraging CSP (50% Deposit)

• Managing risk – It is OK to say No
6

Journey to Sustainability

Loan Term Original Program 

Terms

Collateral

Deposit Fee August 2015

≤ 1 Year Lesser of 20% of 

loan or $1,000,000

0.5% of support 

provided

50% of CSP deposited 

at loan closing, 

remaining 50% 

deposited within 45 

days of being notified 

of a potential risk of 

loss against the 

Lender's loan.

> 1 Year, 

≤ 5 Years

Lesser of 20% of 

loan or $500,000

1.0% of support 

provided

> 5 Years Lesser of 15% of 

loan or $250,000

1.5% of support 

provided
Journey to Sustainability 

• May 2013 – Ability to attract non federal

funding sources into the program

• August 2015 – Implemented leveraged

funding on the CSP accounts

• Constant communication with partnering

Lenders regarding CSP
Contact Information 

Cory C. Phelps 

IHFA 

Office (208) 331-4725

Mobile (208) 830-2542

coryp@ihfa.org

www.idahohousing.com 
NAME HERE / OCTOBER 2014

NAME OF PRESENTATION HERE

Collateral Support 

Sustainability
Collateral Support Sustainability 

• Fees

• Loan Structuring

• Withdrawals

• Economic Impact

Collateral Support Sustainability
Fees 

• MI charges fees both at closing and annually

– Closing fee to minimize requested amount

– Annual fee to prompt discussion between lender and borrower on

whether collateral remains necessary

• Fees are charged to the lender and could prompt a return

of collateral if not paid.

Fees
Loan Structuring 

• Discuss with the lender the anticipated amount of time

that the collateral will be needed.

• Lender financial covenants prompt re-investment in the

balance sheet of the borrower

– Fixed charge or debt service

– Minimum tangible net worth

– Limits on owner compensation

– Borrower base formula for working capital lines (excluding SSBCI

funding)

Loan Structuring
Withdrawals

• No time limit for return of collateral

• Withdrawals are made based on amortization of term

debt

– Quarterly inquiries for balance of loan and balance of collateral

deposit account

– Difference between principal loan balance and SSBCI collateral

balance is returned.

– Threshold set at $10,000 for balance returns as to not create

additional administrative burden for MEDC and lenders.
Economic Impact

• Limit support to industries which generate the most

significant economic impact.

• Eligible industries for MEDC Collateral Support:

– Manufacturing

– Wholesale & trade

– Research & development

– High technology

– Mining

– Office operations

– Film & digital media productions
Contact Info 

Chris Cook 

(517) 373-8089 

cookc@michigan.org

businessloans@michigan.org

www.michiganbusiness.org
W:\WDOX\CLIENTS\1532\0676\00583341.DOCX Page 1 of 3 

CAUSE NO. 03-15-00219-CV

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 

AUSTIN, TEXAS 

HALLMARK SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS, INC. and 

HALLMARK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellants 

v. 

TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee 

From the 98th Judicial District Court, Travis County, Texas 

APPELLANTS HALLMARK SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS, INC. and 

HALLMARK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY’s MOTION FOR 

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT

 NOW COME Appellants Hallmark Specialty Underwriters, Inc. and 

Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company (“Appellants”) and file this, their Motion 

for Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Rule 42.1 of the Texas Rules of Civil 

Procedure and, in support thereof, would show as follows: 

I.

 The parties herein have resolved their differences regarding the present 

matter. Appellants therefore voluntarily dismiss the present appeal pursuant to 

ACCEPTED

03-15-00219-CV

6207530

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

7/24/2015 9:31:41 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/24/2015 9:31:41 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
W:\WDOX\CLIENTS\1532\0676\00583341.DOCX Page 2 of 3

Rule 42.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and the parties agree that all 

appellate costs are to be paid by the party incurring same.

II.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellants pray that this court 

dismiss the present appeal in light of the parties’ resolution of this matter.

Respectfully submitted, 

CURNEY, FARMER,

HOUSE, & OSUNA, P.C.

411 Heimer Road

San Antonio, Texas 78232-4854

(210) 377-1990 (telephone)

(210) 377-1065 (facsimile)

By: /s/ Wm. David Farmer

Wm. David Farmer

State Bar No. 06826470

Email: wdfarmer@cfholaw.com

Chad W. Schreiber

State Bar No. 24085732

Email: cschreiber@cfholaw.com

Attorneys for Appellants 

Hallmark Mutual Insurance 

Company and Hallmark 

Specialty Insurance Company

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Opposing counsel has agreed to and is unopposed to Appellant’s request under 

this Motion.

Date: July 24, 2015

By: /s/ Wm. David Farmer

Wm. David Farmer
W:\WDOX\CLIENTS\1532\0676\00583341.DOCX Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served on the 

following by Electronic Filing Service Provider (EFSP), email, hand delivery, 

facsimile, and/or certified mail, return receipt requested, on the 24th day of July, 

2015:

Via E-mail: splacek@arnoldplacek.com

sarnold@arnoldplacek.com

 jchaltain@arnoldplacek.com

R. Scott Placek

Scott Arnold

Jonathan Chaltain

Arnold & Placek, PC

203 East Main Street, Suite 201

Round Rock, Texas 78664

Telephone: (512) 341-7044

Facsimile: (512) 341-7921

Trial Attorneys for Appellee

Texas Mutual Insurance Company

/s/ Wm. David Farmer
Motions Granted and Order filed September 20, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00176-CR

NO. 14-16-00177-CR

NO. 14-16-00178-CR

____________

JASSSAN RASHAAD HUGHES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1413584, 1392199, 1413583

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes these

appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion to review the 

record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. 

State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is GRANTED.

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 174th District Court to afford 

appellant an opportunity to view the trial records in accordance with local procedure; that 
2

the clerk of that court furnish the records to appellant on or before October 5, 2016; that 

the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the records to 

appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within 30 days of 

that date.

PER CURIAM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 8EM 2024

V. TYRON DIXON TILDON PETITION OF: VICTOR RAUCH, ESQ. ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2024, in consideration ofthe "Petition to Withdraw as Counsel and Remand fora Hearing Pursuantto Commonwealth v. Grazier," this matter is REMANDED for the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County to determine whetherto permitcounsel towithdraw, aswell as any related questions, including whether to allow Tyron Dixon Tildon to proceed pro se. The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to enter its order on remand within 90 days and to promptly inform this Court of its determination. Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision ofthis matter.
EXHIBIT 32
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Taitron Components Incorporated (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1 ) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  May 17, 2010
 /s/ Stewart WangStewart WangChief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ David VanderhorstDavid VanderhorstChief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Alan Kestenbaum, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Ferroglobe PLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Omitted in
accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 2, 2016



By:

/s/ Alan KestenbaumExecutive Chairman and Principal Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
# Official Journal C 382/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 382 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 654 October 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 382

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 654 October 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 382/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Supplement 2022/9 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 382/02 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Supplement 2022/9 (
  1
  ) | 23 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 382/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Supplement 2022/9 (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 382/02

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Supplement 2022/9 (
  1
  )

1

23

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

LANE B. RAVEY, §

(TDCJ No. 02146893), §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 7:22-cv-056-M-BP

§

BRYAN COLLIER, Executive Director, §

TDCJ, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the 

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Collier’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) is 

GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant for violating his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. '

1983 are DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED this 13th day of March, 2023.

Case 7:22-cv-00056-M-BP Document 29 Filed 03/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 148
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 6:22-CR-O16-01-H

ALFREDO RAMIREZ-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TTIE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JIJDGE

CONCER}IING PLEA OF GUILTY

JAMES SLEY HENDRIX

I-iNI STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANGELO DIVISION

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance wittt 28 U.S.C.

$ 636OX1), the undersigred District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is colrect, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

oateanly $ ,2ozz.

Case 6:22-cr-00016-H-BU Document 31 Filed 07/18/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 54