alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00868-CV

Clifford Reed LEONARD,

Appellant

v.

Prunella LEONARD,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI16519

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 30, 2019

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by January 2, 2019. After neither the brief nor a 

motion for extension of time was filed, this court ordered that appellant file, by no later than

January 22, 2019, a brief and a written response reasonably explaining: (1) his failure to timely 

file a brief, and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely file a 

brief. We advised appellant that his failure to timely file a brief and response would result in this 

appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP.
04-18-00868-CV

- 2 -

P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal for failure to comply with court order). Appellant did 

not file a brief or response. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. 

PER CURIAM
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133055 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133055 

 COA: 263508 

Wayne CC: 05-001152-01

DAVID BRANDON PEATROSS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0521 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2007 

 Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes. In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wheeling-Pittsburgh Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, James G. Bradley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. Date: November 9, 2004
    
    By:
    

    /s/ James G. BradleyJames G. BradleyChief Executive Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an Exhibit to this report
and should not be considered filed as a part of this report.
International Programs

The Department of the Treasury’s FY 2021 budget request for International Programs is included 

in the State, Foreign Operations, and Other Related Programs Appropriation. 

Treasury’s International Programs Justification of Appropriations can be found at the following:

https://home.treasury.gov/about/budget-financial-reporting-planning-and-performance/budgetrequestannual-performance-plan-and-reports/treasury-international-programs-justification-ofappropriations
CAUSE NO. DC-22—05135

ELLA CAINE, et al IN THE DISTRICT COURT PLAINTIFF,

v. 14“- JUDICIAL DISTRICT

EDUVISION, INC. (D/B/A ARIZONA COLLEGE OF NURSING DALLAS; AZCC EDUCATION, INC.; ARIZONA COLLEGE DALLAS) DEFENDANTS. 0F DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

ORDER OF NONSUIT

The Court having received Plaintiff Maria Herrera’s Notice of Nonsuit, ORDERS that this Pffiin’l rel ') Firs ))

suit be dismissed and thaLaH-p‘eme responsible fer-m own costs-and-Ifaes.

SIGNED on Que, 2.011,

Judge Presiding

EXHIBIT H

Case 3:22-cv-01713-S Document 1-8 Filed 08/08/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              63
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                       135
<INVENTORY>                                     34,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,157
<PP&E>                                           3,883
<DEPRECIATION>                                     918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,640
<BONDS>                                         34,608
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,019
<SALES>                                         24,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,008
<CGS>                                           16,988
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,988
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,948
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     9
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,140
<INCOME-TAX>                                       862
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,278
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,278
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 4:30PM EDT: June 24, 2014

CONTACT: Treasury Public Affairs (202) 622-2960

FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 24, 2014

WASHINGTON – Secretary Lew today convened a meeting of the Financial Stability Oversight 

Council in a closed session at the Treasury Department. 

During the meeting, the Council received a presentation from the Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on short-term wholesale 

funding markets. The Council also received an update on macroeconomic and market 

developments, including a presentation from the Office of Financial Research and a presentation 

on leveraged lending by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. 

In addition, the Council voted to approve the minutes of its previous meeting, on May 7. 

Today’s meeting was the first for the new chairperson of the Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission, Timothy Massad, who was confirmed by the Senate and sworn in earlier this 

month. 

Additional information regarding the Council and its work is available at www.fsoc.gov.

###
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 222 (Thursday, November 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29381]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-400-LA; ASLBP No. 99-762-02-LA; November 9, 2000]


Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; Notice (Schedule for Oral 
Argument)

Before Administrative Judges:
    G. Paul Bollwerk, III, Chairman
    Dr. Peter S. Lam
    Thomas D. Murphy

    In the Matter of Carolina Power & Light Company (Shearon Harris 
Nuclear Power Plant)

    In accordance with the Licensing Board's memorandum and order of 
August 28, 2000, the Board will hold the 10 CFR 2.1113 argument 
regarding the parties' written summaries on intervenor Board of 
Commissioners of Orange County's (BCOC) contention EC-6, Environmental 
Impact Statement Required, on Thursday, December 7, 2000, beginning at 
9:30 a.m. EST, in the Jane S. McKimmon Conference Center, North 
Carolina State University, corner of Gorman Street and Western Avenue, 
Raleigh, North Carolina. The procedures applicable to this oral 
argument will be the same as those used for the January 2000 oral 
argument. See Licensing Board Memorandum and Order (Subpart K Oral 
Argument Procedures) (Jan. 13, 2000) at 1-3 (unpublished).
    At this juncture, it is the Board's intent that this oral argument 
will be open to the public. If, in submitting written summaries, any of 
the parties utilize proprietary or other nonpublic information, the 
parties should be prepared to advise the Board whether that information 
will be discussed during, or otherwise be a part of, the oral argument. 
See id. at 5.

    Rockville, Maryland, November 9, 2000.

    For the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board \*\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \*\ Copies of this notice were sent this date by Internet e-mail 
transmission to counsel for (1) applicant Carolina Power and Light 
Company; (2) intervenor BCOC; and (3) the NRC staff.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

G. Paul Bollwerk, III,
Administrative Judge.
[FR Doc. 00-29381 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOSEPH E. NAGY, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-1155-K

§

KEVIN MCGRATH, ET AL., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a 

recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed 

the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, 

the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

Signed June 22nd, 2022.

__________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01155-K-BN Document 8 Filed 06/22/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 47
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 20, 2010 

d1013 

Order 

 

October 20, 2010 

140241(40) 

ALESIA HARRIS, Personal Representative of 

the Estate of Henry J. Harris, Deceased, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140241 

 COA: 285426 

WCAC: 06-000256 

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 16, 

2010 order is considered, and it is GRANTED. We VACATE our order dated April 16, 

2010. On reconsideration, the application for leave to appeal the November 24, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 

7.302(H)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this 

order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application or 

reconsideration motion papers.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 1

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative

to equal rights for men and women.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. EDWARDS of California (for himself, Mrs. SCHROEDER, Mr. ACKERMAN,

Mr. ANDREWS of Texas, Mr. ANDREWS of New Jersey, Mr. BACCHUS of

Florida, Mr. BEILENSON, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. COLEMAN,

Mr. CONYERS, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. DELLUMS, Mr. DICKS, Mr. EVANS, Mr.

FAZIO, Mr. FROST, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. GEJDENSON, Mr.

HALL of Ohio, Mr. JACOBS, Mrs. KENNELLY, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. KILDEE,

Mr. LANTOS, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. MINETA, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. NADLER,

Mr. PANETTA, Mr. SABO, Mr. SHAYS, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Ms. SNOWE, Mr.

STARK, Mr. SWIFT, Mr. TOWNS, Mrs. UNSOELD, and Mr. FOGLIETTA)

introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relative to equal rights for men and women.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con-
2

•HJ 1 IH

1 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

2 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

3 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

4 States within seven years from the date of its submission

5 by the Congress:

6 ‘‘ARTICLE—

7 ‘‘SECTION 1. Equality of rights under the law shall

8 not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any

9 State on account of sex.

10 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have the power to

11 enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this

12 article.

13 ‘‘SECTION 3. This article shall take effect two years

14 after the date of ratification.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCKDryISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-059-01-H

JOSE EUGENIO PAVON.RTVERA,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JIJDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GI,JILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magisnate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636OXl), the undersigrred District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order'

SO ORDERED

Dated September ,t, 2022.

JAMES LEY HENDRIX

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:22-cr-00059-H-BQ Document 27 Filed 09/27/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 44
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          44,726
<SECURITIES>                                    37,953
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,815
<PP&E>                                          25,736
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,231
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,340
<BONDS>                                          8,086
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,265
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,710
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (39,999)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (39,999)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (39,999)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.32)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 161 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 161

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  restrict annual deficits by limiting the public debt of the United 
   States and requiring a favorable vote of the people on any law to 
                           exceed such limit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 1993

   Mr. Pickett introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  restrict annual deficits by limiting the public debt of the United 
   States and requiring a favorable vote of the people on any law to 
                           exceed such limit.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. The public debt of the United States shall not in any 
fiscal year increase by more than one percent of the amount of the 
public debt outstanding at the beginning of such year unless authorized 
by a law approved by a majority of the Members elected to each the 
Senate and the House of Representatives, which law shall not take 
effect until it shall have been submitted to the people at an election 
and a majority of those voting on the question shall have approved such 
law.
    ``Section 2. Section 1 shall not apply to public debt contracted--
            ``(1) to repel invasion of the United States; or
            ``(2) to defend the United States in time of war; or
            ``(3) to support the Armed Forces of the United States in 
        time of war; or
            ``(4) to redeem a previous debt obligation of the United 
        States.
    ``Section 3. This article shall take effect beginning with the 
second fiscal year beginning after its ratification.''.

                                 <all>
```
----

(2004/C 84 E/0115)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3723/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject:   Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Livorno

With reference to question E-0964/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of Livorno (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the SAVE II programme, the Commission replied on 25 April 2003 to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission state whether, since then and up to the present, it has received any SAVE II projects from that municipality?

----

(1)OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

----
E.1 TARP Bank Support Program Status

Billions of US$ As Of: 29-Jun-2012 Billions of US$
300 300
HE Amount Outstanding Interest/Fees/Gains

!y), Amount Repaid and Other Income
250 + Realized To Date | 250
200 200
150 150
100 100
50 50
0 0

Total Investment Income To Date

Source: U.S. Department of Treasury

Remaining Outstanding


H.1 Prime Fund Bank Holdings

Billions of US$
1000

End Date: May-2012

Billions of US$
1000

800

600

400

200

0
Dec:10

Source: SEC

Mar:11

! Europe*
MO) Eurozone*
WM France

Jun:11 Sep:11 Dec:11

800

600

400

200

Mar:12

*Note: Inclusive of entire area below.


B.2 Greece: Debt Exchange

€199 billion

eligible debt
oe

€63 billion new

government bonds
EEE

€30 billion EFSF notes
—————

Source: Greek Public Debt Management Agency, FRBNY calculations


E.2 AIG Investments Committed and Returned

Billions of US$ As Of: 29-Jun-2012 Billions of US$
250 250
EE Amount Committed Interest/Fees/Gains
2!) Amount Returned/Cancelled Realized to Date
200 | 4 Amount Outstanding MEE Current Value of Gov. | 200
Stake*

150 150
100 100
50 50
0 0

Max Commitment Remaining Investment Overall Value
*Government stake includes FRBNY’s

interest in ML Ill; value reflects 31-Mar-12
Source: U.S. Treasury, FRBNY prices applied to 27-Jun-12 portfolio


H.2 Prime Fund Portfolio Composition

Percent End Date: May-2012 Percent
40 40
35 - CD 4 35
30 PN | 30
25 F 7 25
20 + 7 20
15 £ 7 15
10 + 7 10
I |
5 + ABCP 45
0) 1 1! l 1 L 0
Jan:11 Apr:11 Jul:11 Oct:11 Jan:12 Apr:12

Source: SEC


A.1 S&P Downgrade of U.S. Debt: Flight to Quality

Percentage Yield 5-Jul-2011 to 6-Sep-2011 Basis Points
3.5 300
i <— August 5, 2011
3.0 g | 250
2.5 F
+ 200
2.0 -
| 150
1.5 5
+ 100
1.0 F
U.S. 2-Year Government Bonds
0.0 —~ 0
Jul:11 Aug:11 Sep:11

Source: Bloomberg, Haver Analytics

*Note: Spread to Treasuries.


F.1 HFT % Use in Various Asset Classes

Percent End Date: 2012 Percent

80 80
MM US. Equities IY) Global FX

70 + (9) Global Futures INN) Global Fixed Income | 70

60

50

40

30

20

10

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Source: Aite Group Note: 2012 Estimate.


A.2 S&P Downgrade of U.S. Debt: Effect on Equities

Growth of $1 5-Jul-2011 to 6-Sep-2011 Growth of $1
1.1 1.1
<— August 5, 2011
1.0 =& a + 1.0
== a
0.9 + aN 0.9
S&P 500 OF {
0.8 + + 0.8
0.7 1} 0.7
Jul:11 Aug:11 Sep:11

Source: Bloomberg


B.1 Greece: Average Bond Price and CDS

Percent of Par End Date: 8-Mar-2012 Percent of Par
140 140
MO 5-Year CDS Points Upfront
120 MMMM Average Bond Price* 120
100 100

80 80

60 60

40 40

20 20

0 0

Jan:10 Jul:10 Jan:11 Jul:11 Jan:12
Stacked chart: points upfront plus price
sum to approximately 100.
*Unweighted average, constructed hybrid
Source: Bloomberg, Markit of pre- and post-exchange bonds.