alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-OW-6903-2] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of reopening to public comment period. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice informs the public that the period for the submission of scientific and technical information for the development of the revised Ambient Water Quality Criterion for Methylmercury is extended. 

# DATES:

The comment period has been extended fifteen days to November 27, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

                        Send an original and three copies of any written significant scientific information to W-00-29 Comment Clerk, Water Docket, Ariel Rios 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460. Comments may be hand-delivered to the Water Docket, Room EB57, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Issues may also be submitted electronically to                         *OW-Docket@epa.gov.*                         Information should be submitted as a WP5.1, 6.1 and/or 8.0 or an ASCII file with no form of encryption.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Mary Manibusan, Health and Ecological Criteria Division (4304), US EPA, Ariel Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20460; (202) 260-3688;                         *manibusan.mary@epa.gov*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Environmental Protection Agency published in the                     **Federal Register**                     of October 12, 2000 (65 FR 60664), that scientific and technical information that pertains to the development of a revised Ambient Water Quality Criterion for Methylmercury should be received within 30 days of the                     **Federal Register**                     publication date of October 12, 2000. In response to public interest, the Environmental Protection Agency has granted a fifteen day extension to the public comment period.                 

Geoffrey H. Grubbs, 

Director, Office of Science and Technology. 

[FR Doc. 00-29504 Filed 11-16-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
# QSBL 062013

&P of &N

# Business Lending 063013

Page &P of &N

# QSBL 032013

# QSBL 122012

# QSBL 092012

# QSBL 062012

# QSBL 032012

# QSBL 122011

# QSBL 092011

# QSBL 062011

# QSBL 032011

# image1.png
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of prospective licenses to BTG International Inc. to the Government-owned inventions described in: 

                        U.S. Patent No. 5,932,006 entitled, “BaF2                        /GaAs Electronic Components”, date issued: August 3, 1999.                     

U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/197,440 entitled, “Gallium Arsenide Semiconductor Devices Fabricated with Insulator Layer”, filing date: November 23, 1998, Navy Case No. 79412. 

U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/563,740 entitled, “Electronic Devices With Diffusion Barrier and Process for Making Same”, filing date: May 3, 2000, Navy Case No. 82111. 

U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/631,121 entitled, “Gallium Arsenide Semiconductor Devices Fabricated With Insulator Layer”, filing date: August 2, 2000, Navy Case No. 82528. 

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later than January 16, 2001. 

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with the Office of Patent Counsel, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Laboratory, CD222, 17320 Dahlgren Road, VA 22448-5100, telephone (540) 653-8061. 

Authority:35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404. 

Dated: November 3, 2000.

J.L. Roth, 

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-29389 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
#### ELLIS v. STATE.

No. 21709.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 5, 1941.

George D. Hagans, of Denison, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was ■ convicted of assault with intent to murder, and her punishment assessed at one year’s confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of' exception.

*612The indictment and all matters of procedure appear regular.

The judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER01-364-000]

Take notice that on November 3, 2000, Wisconsin Electric Power Company (Wisconsin Electric), tendered for filing an electric service agreement under its Market Rate Sales Tariff (FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 8) with Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC.

Wisconsin Electric respectfully requests an effective date of November 1, 2000 to allow for economic transactions.

Copies of the filing have been served on Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC, the Michigan Public Service Commission, and the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before November 24, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the                           ( print page 69760)                        Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-29593  Filed 11-17-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 222 (Thursday, November 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29424]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Consumer Roundtable; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the following 
meeting: Consumer roundtable to discuss consumer protection priorities 
for the agency. The roundtable will provide an opportunity for FDA to 
engage in an open dialogue with individual consumer stakeholders on a 
variety of regulatory and consumer oriented issues. The roundtable is 
part of the agency's ongoing consultation with stakeholders.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on December 13, 2000, 9 
a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Location: The meeting will be held at the Penthouse Conference 
Room, Hubert H. Humphrey Bldg., 200 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, 
DC.
    Contact: Karen R. Mahoney, Office of Consumer Affairs (HFE-88), 
Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 
301-827-4393, FAX 301-827-2866, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b70767a7374757e625b7478357d7f7a357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cca7a1ada4a3a2a9b58ca3afe2aaa8ade2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Registration: Preregistration is required as space is limited. Send 
registration information (including name, title, organization name, 
address, telephone, fax number, and e-mail) to the contact person by 
December 6, 2000.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact Karen R. Mahoney (address above) at least 7 days in advance.
    Background information on this meeting will be available on the FDA 
Internet site at http://www.fda.gov/opacom/hpmeetings.html.
    Transcripts: Transcripts of the meeting may be requested in writing 
from the Freedom of Information Office (HFI-35), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, rm. 12A-16, Rockville, MD 20857, 
approximately 15 working days after the meeting at a cost of 10 cents 
per page.

    Dated: November 9, 2000.
Margaret M. Dotzel,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-29424 Filed 10-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-QSB  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          3,320
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          1,249
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    48,620
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          1,680
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                       106,028
<ALLOWANCE>                                       535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                167,383
<DEPOSITS>                                     82,658
<SHORT-TERM>                                   70,952
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             1,402
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           92
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                167,383
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 6,394
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               2,121
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  193
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                8,708
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              2,385
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              5,125
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           3,583
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     130
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (66)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 2,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,511
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      1,511
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      977
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.04
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.18
<LOANS-NON>                                       761
<LOANS-PAST>                                        5
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 2,618
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  443
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      40
<RECOVERIES>                                        1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 535
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              535
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________ No. 96-40873

_______________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

DAVID SORRELLS,
Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(G-96-CV-1083)

_________________________ August 14, 1997
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

David Sorrells seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) in
order to appeal the denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or
correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In accordance

with the Anti-Terrorism and E ffective Death Penalty Act of 1996

(“AEDPA”) , Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, 1217-18 (1996),1 See Lucas v. Johnson , 101 F.3d 1045, 1046 (5th Cir. 1996).

2 Sorrells filed a motion for a COA on December 20, 1996. We stayed
briefing pending the disposition of this motion, and we now order
the briefing schedule to be implemented.

The AEDPA amended 28 U.S.C. § 2253 to require the issuance of

a COA as a prerequisite to appealing the denial of a § 2255 motion.

In United States v. Orozco , 103 F.3d 389 (5th Cir. 1996), we held

that the COA requirement applies to § 2255 petitions in which the
notice of appeal was filed on or after the effective date of the

AEDPA, April 24, 1996. I d

. at 390-92. Sorrells filed a notice of

appeal on July 22, 1996, and filed a motion for COA on December 20,

1996. We stayed briefing pending the disposition of this motion. 1

The intervening decision in Lindh v. Murphy , 117 S. Ct. 2059

(1997), however, eliminates the need to issue a COA in the instant

case. In L indh
, the Court concluded that the amendments to chapter

153 of title 28 apply only to cases filed after the effective date

of the AEDPA. I d

. at 4561. Insofar as the COA requirement,

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) , falls within chapter 153 of title 28, L indh

has overruled Orozco . Hence, the COA requirement applies only to

§ 2255 petitions filed after the effective date of the AEDPA.

United States v. Carter , 117 F.3d 262, 264 (5th Cir. 1997).

Sorrells filed the instant § 2255 petition on April 1, 1996.

Therefore, a COA is not needed to vest jurisdiction in this court.
Accordingly, we order that a briefing notice shall issue forthwith,3

instructing the United States to respond to Sorrells's brief, and

the appeal shall be submitted for consideration and action in
accordance with the usual procedures.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 242

Designating the week beginning October 17, 1993, as ‘‘National Radon Action

Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 28, 1993

Mr. MARKEY (for himself and Mr. HASTERT) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil

Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the week beginning October 17, 1993, as

‘‘National Radon Action Week’’.

Whereas exposure to radon poses a serious threat to the

health of the people of the United States;

Whereas the Environmental Protection Agency estimates that

lung cancer attributable to radon exposure causes approximately 14,000 deaths per year in the United States;

Whereas excessively high levels of radon in homes and schools

can be reduced successfully and economically with appropriate mitigation measures;
2

•HJ 242 IH

Whereas only a small percentage of the homes in the Nation

have been tested for radon levels;

Whereas the people of the United States should be educated

about the dangers of exposure to radon;

Whereas the people of the United States should be encouraged to conduct tests for radon in their homes and

schools and to make the repairs required to reduce excessive radon levels; and

Whereas increased public awareness of the dangers of radon

gas will lead to more informed decisionmaking and a

more productive use of resources: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week beginning October 17, 1993, is designated

4 as ‘‘National Radon Action Week’’, and the President is

5 authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling

6 on the people of the United States to observe the week

7 with appropriate activities designed to increase public

8 awareness of the dangers of radon gas and of available

9 mitigation measures.

Æ
# L_2008316EN.01S00301.xml

| 26.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 316/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 316/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
#### WOODS v. STATE.

No. 21706.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 5, 1941.

W. E. Martin, of Abilene, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is forgery. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The indictment contained two counts, the first of which charged appellant with forging the name of M. D. Moore to a check which reads in words and figures as follows :

> “Roscoe, Texas, 10-14 1940-No -

> “The Roscoe State Bank 88-748

> “Of Roscoe, Texas

> “Pay to Sam Woods or bearer $2 00

> “Two No/100.Dollars

> “M. D. Moore.”

The second count charged appellant with knowingly passing as true to Ed Graham said forged check. The court, in his charge, submitted the case to the jury on the first count of the indictment.

Ed Graham, who was called by the State as a witness, testified that he was employed by the Lieb Food Market located in the town of Sweetwater, Texas. He was handed a check which he identified as the one which appellant passed to him in payment for some groceries. This check was then handed to the Court Reporter who marked it as State’s Exhibit No. 1.

The cashier of the Roscoe State Bank was called by the State as a witness and identified the check marked, “State’s Exhibit No. 1” as the one which was presented to his bank for payment, but the check itself was never formally introduced in evidence. This was necessary in order for the State to make a complete case under the following authorities: 19 Tex.Jur. p. 861, § 49; Gammill v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 489, 112 S.W.2d 725; Spence v. State, 109 Tex. Cr.R. 617, 6 S.W.2d 364. Consequently, this case must be reversed and the cause remanded.

There are three bills of exception in the record but, in our opinion, the questions thereby presented will most likely not arise upon another trial. We, therefore, preter-mit a discussion of the same.

For the error herein pointed out, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
# Official Journal C 32/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.032.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 32 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 539 February 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.032.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 32

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 539 February 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2010/C 032/01 | Report on the audit of the operational efficiency of the management of the European Central Bank for the 2007 financial year together with the replies of the European Central Bank | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Auditors

2010/C 032/01

Report on the audit of the operational efficiency of the management of the European Central Bank for the 2007 financial year together with the replies of the European Central Bank

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN