alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00053-Z-BR

§

GABRIEL RICARDO MARTINEZ (3) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

GABRIEL RICARDO MARTINEZ (3), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th 

Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 6 of the 

Indictment. After cautioning and examining GABRIEL RICARDO MARTINEZ (3) under oath concerning each of the 

subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense 

charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore 

recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that GABRIEL RICARDO MARTINEZ (3) be adjudged guilty of 18 

U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2) - CONVICTED FELON IN POSSESSION OF A FIREARM and have sentence imposed 

accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: October 6, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00053-Z-BR Document 84 Filed 10/06/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 199
SERVE D APRI L15,201 0 DFPTOFTR^HSPORWIO N U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N i C OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C
. :
I N TH EMATTE RO F CIT Y O FBRIDGEPORT , CONNECTICU T

Respondent
. DOCKE T NO
. CP09NE000 1 (Civi l Penalty Proceeding ) DM S NO
. FAA-2009-097 7
ADMINISTRATIV ELA WJUDGE' S ORDE RCONVENIN G

PREHEARIN GCONFERENC E A pre-hearin g conferenc e b y telephon e wil l b e hel dbefore m e o n May 27 , 2010
. I t

wil l begi n at

10:0 0 a.m. . Easter n Time
. Th e purpos e o f

th e conferenc e wil l b e t o dispos e o f an y remainin g pre-hearin g issue s (includin g dispute s concernin g discovery) , t o determin e th e parties ' readines s for

th e hearing , an dt o discus s th e statu s o f settlemen t negotiations
. O n o r befor e th e clos e o f

busines s o n May 24 , 2010 , eac ho f th e partie s wil l notif

y m y Assistant , Ms
. Dian e Mays , o f th e telephon e numbe r at whic hit s representativ e can b e reache dshortl y befor e 10:0 0 a.m . o n May 27,2010
. He r

telephon e numbe r

i s (202 ) 366-2132
. Arrangement s wil l b e availabl e unde r

whic halimite dnumbe r

o f othe r intereste dperson s may listen-i n t o th e conference
. Th e failure o f

aparty t o b e availabl e for o r t o participat e in , th e pre hearin g conferenc e wil l b e deeme dan indicatio n tha t th e party n o longe r wishe s t o prosecut e th e cas e o r t o enjo y th e benefit s o f

atrial-typ e hearing
.Suc hfailure ma y b e ground s fo r th e issuanc e o f

adispositiv e orde r

b y default
. I T I S S O ORDERED
.

Isaa c D
. Benki n Administrativ e La w Judg eFA A Docke t No
. CP09NE000 1 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y
Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC^3 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ^

ON ECOP Y Honorabl e Bil l Finch , Mayo r Cit y o f Bridgeport , Responden t Cit y Hal l Anne x 99 9 Broa dStree t Bridgeport , C T 0660 4 Mar k T
. Anastasi , Respondent' s Counse l Cit y Attorney , City o f

Bridgeport 99 9 Broa dStree t

2"' ' Floo r Bridgeport , C T 06604-432 8 TEL : 203-576-808 2 FAX : 203-576-825 2 Joh n R
. Donnelly , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , ANE- 7 New Englan dRegio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 1 2 New Englan dExecutiv e Par k Burlington , M A 01803-529 9 TEL : 781-238-704 3 FAX : 781-238-705 5 Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D
. Benkin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorne y 202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e th

e following address : Federa l Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430
.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37,823; TA-W-37,823A]

                    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on August 18, 2000, applicable to workers of Carleton Woolen Mills, Inc., Winthrop, Maine. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 12, 2000 (65 FR 55050).                

At the request of the petitioners, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged in the production of woolen fabric. New information shows that worker separations occurred at the New York, New York location of Carleton Woolen Mills, Inc. The New York, New York location provided administration, sales, styling, design and support function services for the subject firm's production facility in Winthrop, Maine. All operations at Carleton Woolen Mills, Inc. ceased on April 21, 2000.

Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to cover workers of Carleton Woolen Mills, Inc., New York, New York.

The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Carleton Woolen Mills, Inc. adversely affected by increased imports of woolen fabric.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-37,823 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Carleton Woolen Mills, Inc., Winthrop, Maine (TA-W-37,823) and New York, New York (TA-W-37,823A) who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after July 23, 2000 through August 18, 2002 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, DC this 31st day of October, 2000.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-29159 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

STEVEN CARL COLEGROVE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 608 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JENNIFER VANDERSTOK et al.,

 Plaintiffs, Case No. 4:22-cv-00691-O

 v.

MERRICK GARLAND, in his official 

capacity as Attorney General of the United 

States et al., 

 Defendants.

PROPOSED ORDER

Came on this day Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and the Court having 

read the motion and pleadings on file is of the opinion that the motion is meritorious and should 

be GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that judgment is ENTERED for Defendants. It is 

further ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 140), and 

Intervenor-Plaintiff BlackHawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment (ECF No. 144), and Intervenor-Plaintiffs Defense Distributed and Second 

Amendment Foundation’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 165) are DENIED. 

Dated: ___________________, 2023 ________________________________

REED O’CONNOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00691-O Document 183-1 Filed 02/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 3821
<page>							EXHIBIT 31.01



CERTIFICATIONS


I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President of Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and


<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of Demeter's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.







Date:   May 10, 2004           /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman
                                  	Jeffrey A. Rothman
                               	  	President,
	  	Demeter Management Corporation,
                                  	general partner of the registrant
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 276

Designating May 1, 1994, through May 7, 1994, as ‘‘National Walking

Week’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12, 1993

Mr. MCHALE introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating May 1, 1994, through May 7, 1994, as

‘‘National Walking Week’’.

Whereas medical authorities have established that walking—

(1) powerfully protects against high blood pressure, cholesterol problems, and other factors that

can contribute to heart disease;

(2) protects against adult onset (Type II) diabetes;
2

•HJ 276 IH

(3) builds strong bones and protects against

osteoporosis, the weak-bone disease that afflicts millions of older women;

(4) probably offers protection against several

forms of cancer that are believed to be preventable

through regular and moderate exercise; and

(5) is a safe and dependable way for millions of

overweight people to lose weight without stringent

dieting;

Whereas the failure to exercise regularly, such as walking,

has been identified as the single greatest risk factor for

heart disease;

Whereas the designation of ‘‘National Walking Week’’ will

help promote the issue of pedestrian access and safety;

Whereas areas of America are becoming inaccessible or unsafe for walkers, so the benefits of this activity are being

blocked;

Whereas people should be able to walk anywhere in their

community, within reason; and

Whereas walking encourages community spirit and safety:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That May 1, 1994, through May 7, 1994, is designated

4 as ‘‘National Walking Week’’. The President is authorized

5 and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the
3

•HJ 276 IH

1 people of the United States to observe the week with ap2 propriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

PATRICK A. WHITE, SR., §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § 2:22-CV-152-Z-BR

§

NFN DENNIS, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff, Patrick A. White, Sr., filed a complaint naming as Defendants state employees at 

his unit of incarceration. By Order dated June 29, 2023, Plaintiff was informed of the legal 

deficiencies of his Complaint and directed to replead on or before July 21, 2023. (ECF 7). The 

Order also directed Plaintiff to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Id. at 3). Plaintiff 

has not responded to the Order. Accordingly, dismissal is appropriate. 

RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons discussed in the Order to Replead, (ECF 7), Plaintiff’s Complaint is 

deficient. Because he has failed to replead and correct the deficiencies, it is the 

RECOMMENDATION of the United States Magistrate Judge to the United States District Judge 

that the claims of Plaintiff be DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE

The United States District Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Findings, Conclusion and 

Recommendation to each party by the most efficient means available.

IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.

ENTERED on July 28, 2023. 

Case 2:22-cv-00152-Z-BR Document 8 Filed 07/28/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 41
2

* NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT *

Any party may object to these proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation. In the 

event parties wish to object, they are hereby NOTIFIED that the deadline for filing objections is 

fourteen (14) days from the date of filing as indicated by the “entered” date directly above the 

signature line. Service is complete upon mailing, Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C), or transmission by 

electronic means, Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(E). Any objections must be filed on or before the 

fourteenth (14th) day after this recommendation is filed as indicated by the “entered” date. See

28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d).

Any such objections shall be made in a written pleading entitled “Objections to the 

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation.” Objecting parties shall file the written objections 

with the United States District Clerk and serve a copy of such objections on all other parties. A 

party’s failure to timely file written objections shall bar an aggrieved party, except upon grounds 

of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed factual findings, legal 

conclusions, and recommendation set forth by the Magistrate Judge and accepted by the district 

court. See Douglass v. United Services Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en 

banc), superseded by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), as recognized in ACS 

Recovery Servs., Inc. v. Griffin, 676 F.3d 512, 521 n.5 (5th Cir. 2012); Rodriguez v. Bowen, 857 

F.2d 275, 276-77 (5th Cir. 1988). 

Case 2:22-cv-00152-Z-BR Document 8 Filed 07/28/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 42
Exhibit 35.1



AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB



I, Paul C. Honda, do
hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation
(the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”
and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of May 20, 2015 among
the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2015-2 Owner Trust, as follows:



| | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2016, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set
my hand this 16th day of May, 2016.



| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
| | ---------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64000-64001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25517]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property 
at the Paris Cox Field Airport at Paris, Texas

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Request to Release Airport Property

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invite public comment on the 
release of land at the Paris Cox Field Airport under the provisions of 
Section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment Reform Act for 
the 21st Century (AIR 21).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 26, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address:

Mr. Ed Agnew, Manager Federal Aviation Administration Southwest Region, 
Airports Division, Texas Airports Development Office, ASW-650 Fort 
Worth, Texas 76137

    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to the Mr. Shawn Napier, Director of Engineering, 
Planning, and Development, at the following address:

P.O. Box 9037
Paris, TX 75461

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Anthony Mekhail, Program Manager, 
Federal Aviation Administration, Texas Airports Development Office, 
ASW-650, 2601 Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 76137, Telephone: 
(817) 222-5663, email: Anthony.Mekhail@faa.gov, fax: (817) 222-5989. 
The request to release property may be reviewed in person at this same 
location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the 
request to release property at the Paris Cox Field Airport under the 
provisions of the AIR 21.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    The City of Paris requests the release of 12.662 acres of property 
within the Paris Cox Field Airport. The land was acquired by a Deed of 
Release from the United States of America . The property to be released 
will be sold to the AgPro Inc. and revenues shall be used for the 
operation and maintenance at the airport.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

[[Page 64001]]

    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application, 
notice and other documents relevant to the application in person at the 
Paris Cox Field Airport, telephone number (903) 784-9292.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 15, 2014.
Byron K. Huffman,
Acting Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-25517 Filed 10-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```