alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DULCE MARIA GARCIA VALDEZ ,

Petitioner,

v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 18

- 72155
Agency No. A208

- 118

- 305

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted July 15, 2019 **

Before: SCHRODER, SILVERMAN, and CLIF TON, Cir cuit Judges.
Dulce Maria Garcia Valdez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petition s for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing h er appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying h er application for asylum, withholding of
removal, and relief und er the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 19 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 72155

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the
agency’s factual findings. Garcia

- Milian v. Holder , 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir.
2014). We deny the petition for review

.
Subs tantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that the harm
Garcia Valdez suffered in Mexico did not rise to the level of persecution. See Lim

v. INS , 224 F.3d 929, 936 (9th Cir. 2000) (“Threats standing alone . . . constitute
past persecution in o nly a small category of cases, and only when the threats are so
menacing as to cause significant actual suffering or harm .” (quotation and citation
omitted) )

. Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s determination that

Garcia Valdez failed to estab lish an objectively reasonable fear of future
persecution. See Nagoulko v. INS , 333 F.3d 1012, 101 8 (9th Cir. 2003) (possibility
of future persecution “too speculative”)

. Thus, Garcia Valdez’s asylum claim fails.

In this case , because Garcia Valdez failed to establish eligibility for asylum,

s he failed to establish eligibility for withholding of removal. See Zehatye v.

Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006)

. In her opening brief, Garcia Valdez fails to challenge the agency’s denial of

CAT relief

; t hus , it is waived. See Corro

- Barragan v. Holde r , 718 F.3d 1174,3 18

- 72155

1177 n.5 (9th Cir. 2013) (failure to contest issue in opening brief resulted in
waiver)

.
PETITION FO R REVIEW DENIED.
|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)        
|View History: Annual                                  
|View History: Annual                                  
|View History:                                         
|                                                      
|U.S. Coal Consumed at Refineries (Thousand Short Tons)
|                                                      
|                                                      
|U.S. Coal Consumed at Refineries (Thousand Short Tons)
|                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 246    | 234    | 226    | 192    | 172   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 133    | 150    | 133    | 142    | 129    | NA     | 140    | NA     | 36     | 31    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 32     | 39     | 31     | 41     | 37     | 41     | 34     | 39     | 43     | 34    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 29     | 31     | 30     | 20     | 16     | 17     | 12     | 8      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 285

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make technical corrections in the

enrollment of S. 2182.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 17 (legislative day, AUGUST 11), 1994

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make technical

corrections in the enrollment of S. 2182.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (S. 2182)

3 to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1995 for mili4 tary activities of the Department of Defense, for military

5 construction, and for defense programs of the Department

6 of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths for such fiscal

7 year for the Armed Forces, and for other purposes, the

8 Secretary of the Senate shall make the following correc9 tions:
2

HCON 285 RDS

1 (1) In section 3136, strike out ‘‘20 percent’’

2 and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘80 percent’’.

3 (2) Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘An Act to

4 authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1995 for

5 military activities of the Department of Defense, for

6 military construction, and for defense activities of

7 the Department of Energy, to prescribe personnel

8 strengths for such fiscal year for the Armed Forces,

9 and for other purposes.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives August 17,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0542

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

FRANK WEBB,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 30, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 22 2023

09/22/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0542
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 15, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68894-68895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29101]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD07-00-111]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Siesta Key Bridge (SR 758), 
Sarasota, Sarasota County, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District, has approved a 
temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the 
Siesta Key Drawbridge (SR 758) across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, 
mile 71.6, Sarasota, Sarasota County, Florida. This deviation allows 
the drawbridge owner to provide single leaf openings for vessel 
traffic. This temporary deviation is required November 22, 2000 from 8 
a.m. until 4 p.m., to allow the bridge owner to safely complete 
maintenance to the drawbridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective on November 22, 2000, from 8 a.m. 
until 4 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Barry Dragon, Chief, Operations 
Section, Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge Section at (305) 415-
6743.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Siesta Key Drawbridge (SR 758) across 
the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Sarasota, FL has a vertical clearance 
of 21 feet above mean high water (MHW) measured at the center in the 
closed position. On October 30, 2000 the owner, requested a deviation 
from the current operating regulation in 33 CFR 117.35 which requires 
the drawbridge to open promptly and fully when a request to open is 
given. This temporary deviation was requested to allow necessary 
maintenance to the drawbridge in a critical time sensitive manner.
    The District Commander has granted a temporary deviation from the 
operating requirements listed in 33 CFR

[[Page 68895]]

117.35 for the purpose of maintenance of the drawbridge. Under this 
deviation, the Siesta Key Drawbridge (SR 758) need only provide single 
leaf openings. The deviation is effective on November 22, 2000 from 8 
a.m. until 4 p.m.

    Dated: November 7, 2000.
G.E. Shapley,
Chief, Bridge Administration, Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 00-29101 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67353-67354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28754]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-73-000]


Southwest Gas Transmission Company, A Limited Partnership; Notice 
of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

November 3, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 31, 2000, Southwest Gas Transmission 
Company, A Limited Partnership (SGTC) tendered for filing as part of 
its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 2, the following tariff 
sheets to become effective December 1, 2000.

First Revised Sheet No. 4
Original Sheet No. 28A

    SGTC states that the proposed changes would increase revenues from 
jurisdictional service by $121,138 based on the 12-month period ending 
August 31, 2000, as adjusted.
    SGTC indicates that the principal items of cost changes producing 
its deficiency are: (1) Increases in plant and related items due to the 
construction of facilities to establish an interconnection

[[Page 67354]]

with Transwestern Pipeline Company; and (2) the incurrence of 
additional operation and maintenance expenses.
    SGTC states that it has served copies of its filing on its affected 
customer and interested state regulatory commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28754 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<page> EXHIBIT 32.01





CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
?Report?), I, Walter Davis, President of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	 /s/ Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President of Demeter Management Corporation,
			the general partner of the Partnership

Date:		November 14, 2006
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Secured Digital  Applications,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2006 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Voon Fui Yong,  Chief  Accounting  Officer  (principal  financial
officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ Voon Fui Yong
-----------------
Voon Fui Yong
Chief Accounting Officer
May 22, 2006
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


JAKKS Pacific Announces Court Ruling Requiring
Parties to Provide Notice to Shareholders of Proposed Settlement of Derivative Action and Setting of Hearing Date


 


SANTA MONICA, CA, August 25, 2015
—  JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (NASDAQ: JAKK), today announced that the United States District Court for the Central District
of California has authorized notice to be given to JAKKS’ shareholders of the Court’s preliminary approval of the
previously disclosed settlement of Vladimir Gusinsky Living Trust v. Stephen Berman, et al. (f/k/a Advanced Advisors G. P.
v. Stephen Berman, et al.) Case No. 2-14-cv-01420-JAK (SSx), a consolidated shareholder derivative action. The proposed
settlement is subject to final Court approval, and the Court has set a final approval hearing for November 2, 2015, at 8:30
a.m. PT, in the courtroom of the Honorable John A. Kronstadt, United States District Judge. At the November 2, 2015
hearing, the Court will also hear a request from plaintiff’s counsel for an award of attorneys’ fees and
expenses.


 


The notice of the proposed settlement (the
“Notice”) is attached as Exhibit “I” to this press release, and the terms of the proposed settlement of
the Derivative Action (the "Settlement") are set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of March 23, 2015 (the
"Stipulation"), a copy of which is annexed as Exhibit “A” to the Notice.


 


As required by the Court's Order, JAKKS is filing today with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Current
Report on Form 8-K that provides shareholders with a copy of this press release, the Notice and the Stipulation. The Notice also
contains important information regarding the rights of shareholders with respect to this proposed Settlement. We encourage shareholders
to read the Notice and the Stipulation in their entirety.


 


 





About JAKKS Pacific, Inc.


JAKKS Pacific, Inc., is a leading designer and marketer of toys
and consumer products with a wide range of products that feature popular brands and children's toy licenses.  JAKKS’
diverse portfolio includes Action Figures, Electronics, Dolls, Dress-Up, Role Play, Halloween Costumes, Kids Furniture, Vehicles,
Plush, Art Activity Kits, Seasonal Products, Infant/Pre-School, Construction Toys, Ride-On Vehicles, Wagons, Inflatable Environments
and Tents, Impulse Toys and Pet Products sold under various proprietary brands including JAKKS Pacific®, Road Champs®,
Funnoodle®, JAKKS PetsTM, Plug It In & Play TV GamesTM, Kids Only!®, Tollytots®, Disguise®, Moose
Mountain® and Maui®. JAKKS is an award-winning licensee of several hundred nationally and internationally known trademarks
including Nickelodeon®, Warner Bros.®, DC Comics and Saban’s Power Rangers®. DreamPlay Toys, LLC is a joint venture
between JAKKS Pacific, Inc. and NantWorks LLC to develop, market and sell toys and related consumer products incorporating NantWorks’
proprietary iD recognition technology. www.jakks.com 


 


 


# # #


 


CONTACT:


 





	Sara Rosales Montalvo	Joel Bennett
	424/268-9363	424/268-9450
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Taitron Components Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stewart
Wang, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 15, 2008
                                             By: /s/ Stewart Wang
                                                 ----------------
                                                 Stewart Wang
                                                 Principal Executive Officer and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 50 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 50

     To provide for the display of the flag commemorating the 50th 
       Anniversary of World War II in the rotunda of the Capitol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1993

   Mr. Skelton (for himself and Mr. Emerson) submitted the following 
  concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     To provide for the display of the flag commemorating the 50th 
       Anniversary of World War II in the rotunda of the Capitol.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
The Architect of the Capitol, under the direction of the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate, 
shall take all necessary steps for the display of the flag 
commemorating the 50th Anniversary of World War II in the rotunda of 
the Capitol until November 11, 1995.

                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

CARBONE’S FINE GOODS AND WINES, 

LLC. 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CARBONE RESTAURANT LLC, 

CARBONE FINE FOOD LLC, THE 

MAJOR FOOD GROUP LLC and MAJOR 

INTELLECTUAL LLC, 

 Defendants. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

 NO. 3:22-CV-1184-E 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF RUBEN ALAN GARCIA 

Notice is hereby given that the undersigned attorney, Ruben Alan Garcia, enters his 

appearance as additional counsel of record in the above-styled and numbered cause on behalf of 

Defendants Carbone Restaurant LLC, Carbone Fine Food LLC, The Major Food Group LLC, 

and Major Intellectual LLC (“Defendants”). Mr. Garcia is admitted to practice in this Court and 

respectfully requests to be added as an attorney of record so that he may receive copies of all 

filings in this matter. 

Ruben Alan Garcia 

TX State Bar No. 24101787 

ruben.a.garcia@kirkland.com

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

4550 Travis Street 

Dallas, Texas 75205 

Tel: (214) 972-1770 

Fax: (214) 972-1771 

 

Case 3:22-cv-01184-E Document 15 Filed 07/22/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 672
Dated: July 22, 2022 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Ruben Alan Garcia

 Jeremy Fielding 

Texas Bar No. 17233700 

Jonathan David Kelley 

Texas Bar No. 24090202 

Ruben Alan Garcia 

Texas Bar No. 24101787 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

4550 Travis Street 

Dallas, Texas 75205 

Telephone: (214) 972-1770 

Facsimile: (214) 972-1771 

jeremy.fielding@kirkland.com

jon.kelley@kirkland.com

ruben.a.garcia@kirkland.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

Case 3:22-cv-01184-E Document 15 Filed 07/22/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 673
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on July 22, 2022, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court for the Northern District of Texas, using the 

CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to counsel of record.

 

/s/ Ruben Alan Garcia

Ruben Alan Garcia

Case 3:22-cv-01184-E Document 15 Filed 07/22/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 674
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7135
MICHAEL WAYNE MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN DOE; LAURIE BESSINGER; VAUGHN JACKSON, Captain, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-1199-CV-6-3AK) Submitted: January 23, 1996 Decided: February 13, 1996 Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Jud ges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Michael Wayne Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Andrew Frederick Lindemann, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his pretrial motions. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED