alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 205 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 205

 Designating the week beginning October 31, 1993, as ``National Health 
                     Information Management Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             May  27, 1993

    Mr. Duncan introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Designating the week beginning October 31, 1993, as ``National Health 
                     Information Management Week''.

Whereas accurate, timely, and complete medical records and related health 
        information are vital in planning and providing for quality health care 
        for the people of the United States;
Whereas such records and information are vital to providing health care to an 
        individual beginning at the birth of the individual and continuing 
        throughout the life of the individual;
Whereas public concern about the quality, appropriateness, and effectiveness of 
        health care is escalating;
Whereas specific skills in evaluating and reporting the results of health care 
        are required to provide public accountability;
Whereas equitable third-party reimbursement for health care is dependent on 
        health information that is collected, analyzed, classified, verified, 
        and disseminated;
Whereas public awareness of patient rights, including the right of a patient to 
        access the patient's own medical information, is increasing;
Whereas the needs and requirements for health information of the health care 
        industry and the use of the information by the industry are changing 
        rapidly;
Whereas the rate of such changes will continue to increase as new health care 
        technology is used and new health care reform policies are promulgated;
Whereas the 35,000 members of the American Health Information Management 
        Association are the health information leaders of the United States; and
Whereas such members have demonstrated commitment to, and expertise in, health 
        information management: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week beginning 
October 31, 1993, is designated as ``National Health Information 
Management Week'', and the President is authorized and requested to 
issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United States to 
observe the week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
#### KING v. STATE.

No. 26403.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 10, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of robbery by assault and violence. The punish*822ment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of 25 years.

The indictment and all matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL

Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK

Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice

Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx

VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

January 28, 2015

Shannon Brady Geihsler

Attorney at Law

1001 Main Street, Suite 803

Lubbock, TX 79401-3322

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Jeffrey S. Ford

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

P.O. Box 10536

Lubbock, TX 79408

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-14-00360-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 2014-401,146

Style: Shelly Blair v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

The following was filed Wednesday, January 28, 2015 in the captioned appeal:

Reporter’s Record (12 volumes)

Very truly yours,

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

xc: Barbara Sucsy (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Honorable Bradley S. Underwood (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Janette Bills (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

FILE COPY
447.33054
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 128 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 128

   Commending Israel concerning the decision of the Supreme Court of 
               Israel in the case of John Demjanjuk, Sr.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 1993

Mr. Traficant submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Commending Israel concerning the decision of the Supreme Court of 
               Israel in the case of John Demjanjuk, Sr.

Whereas the July 29, 1993, decision of the Israeli Supreme Court to overturn the 
        conviction and death sentence of John Demjanjuk, Sr., demonstrates 
        Israel's commitment to the concept of individual rights;
Whereas the decision makes a powerful statement as to the credibility of the 
        Israeli judicial process considering the extraordinary sensitivity 
        surrounding the case; and
Whereas the decision demonstrates that Israel maintains the highest standards of 
        justice: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
The Congress commends the courageous decision by the Israeli Supreme 
Court to overturn the conviction and death sentence in the case of John 
Demjanjuk, Sr.

                                 <all>
```
#### COPUS et al. v. CHORN et al.

No. 2108.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

June 13, 1941.

R. E. Rodgers, of Hamlin, for plaintiffs in error.

Smith & Smith, of Anson, and Malone, Lipscomb, White & Seay, of Dallas, for defendants in error.

FUNDERBURK, Justice.

Because of the disposition required to be made of the case, it will be unnecessary to make a statement as to the nature of the suit.

While the case was pending in this court, before submission, defendants in error made a motion to dismiss on the ground that this court was without jurisdiction. The questions presented by that motion were determined by this court, as shown by majority and minority opinions, reported in 145 S.W.2d 958. Subsequently, in answer to certified questions, the Supreme Court, in effect, held that the Court of Civil Appeals is without jurisdiction to determine the merits of a case prosecuted upon writ of error when plaintiffs in error participated in the trial of the case, unless writ of error was perfected on or prior to January 1, 1940. In other words, as applied to the facts of this case, that the plaintiffs in error’s right to review did not exist. Copus v. Chorn, Tex.Sup., 150 S.W.2d 70. Upon the authority of that decision, we are required to dismiss the writ of error. It is accordingly so ordered.
United States District Court

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:21-CR-00530-S

§

JOSHUA WARREN PANNITTI (2) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

JOSHUA WARREN PANNITTI (2), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count Three of the 

Superseding Indictment. After cautioning and examining JOSHUA WARREN PANNITTI (2) under oath concerning 

each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the 

offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I 

therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that JOSHUA WARREN PANNITTI (2) be adjudged guilty 

of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, Possession with the Intent to Distribute a Controlled 

Substance, Aiding and Abetting, and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the 

District Judge: 

☐ The Defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. 

☐ The Defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The Defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release. 

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). 

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The Defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release. 

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The Defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless: (1)(a) the Court finds there is 

a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the Defendant should not be detained; and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released. 

SIGNED October 13, 2022. 

 

 _____________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B). 

Case 3:21-cr-00530-S Document 48 Filed 10/13/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 91
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00046-Z-BR

§

JAMIE CATINA HADDOCK (2) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

JAMIE CATINA HADDOCK (2), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R.CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 2 of the Indictment.

After cautioning and examining JAMIE CATINA HADDOCK (2) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in 

Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that JAMIE CATINA HADDOCK (2) be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C)

- POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE METHAMPHETAMINE and have sentence imposed accordingly. 

After being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: September 23, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00046-Z-BR Document 241 Filed 09/23/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 501
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5 <LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated   balance   sheet,   consolidated   statement  of  operations   and
consolidated statement of cash flows included in the Company's Form 10-Q for the
period  ended March 26,  1999,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     JUN-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                        JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                          MAR-26-1999
<CASH>                                                   13,514
<SECURITIES>                                             74,462
<RECEIVABLES>                                            16,164
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                               9,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        122,666
<PP&E>                                                   17,155
<DEPRECIATION>                                            7,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          132,005
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    22,484
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                    264
<OTHER-SE>                                              109,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            132,005
<SALES>                                                  77,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         77,139
<CGS>                                                    29,935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            65,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          14,178
<INCOME-TAX>                                              5,246
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       8,932
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                              8,932
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0.35
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smithway Motor Xpress Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
C. Sandvig, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                /s/ Douglas C. Sandvig
                                                --------------------------
                                                Douglas C. Sandvig
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                August 13, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37,823A]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor issued an Amended Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on October 31, 2000, applicable to workers of Carleton Woolen Mills, Inc., New York, New York. The notice will be published soon in the                     **Federal Register.**

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers provided administration, sales, styling, design and support function services for the subject firm's production facility in Winthrop, Maine. Findings show that the Department incorrectly set the worker certification impact date at July 23, 2000. The impact date should be June 14, 1999, one year prior to the date of the petition. Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to reflect this matter.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-37,823A is hereby issued as follows:

“All workers of Carleton Woolen Mills, Inc., New York, New York who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after June 14, 1999 through August 18, 2002 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.”

Signed at Washington, DC this 8th day of November, 2000.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-29369  Filed 10-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
# Official Journal L 165/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.165.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 165 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5424 June 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.165.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 165

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5424 June 2011

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 579/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 850/98 for the conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms and Council Regulation (EC) No 1288/2009 establishing transitional technical measures from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2011 | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 580/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 460/2004 establishing the European Network and Information Security Agency as regards its duration (1) | 3 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 581/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 55/2008 introducing autonomous trade preferences for the Republic of Moldova | 5 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 579/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 850/98 for the conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms and Council Regulation (EC) No 1288/2009 establishing transitional technical measures from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2011

1

*

Regulation (EU) No 580/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 460/2004 establishing the European Network and Information Security Agency as regards its duration (1)

3

*

Regulation (EU) No 581/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 55/2008 introducing autonomous trade preferences for the Republic of Moldova

5

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Wendel, County Treas., *v.*Hughes, Appellant, et al.

(No. 28459

Decided February 5, 1941.)

*Mr. Paul A. Baden,*prosecuting attorney, for appellee.

*Mr. George 8. Hawke,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of fight be, and.the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.

Williams, J., not participating.