alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         344,614
<SECURITIES>                                 1,246,875
<RECEIVABLES>                                  886,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,000
<INVENTORY>                                    775,129
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,300,184
<PP&E>                                         895,465
<DEPRECIATION>                                 342,869
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,876,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          547,659
<BONDS>                                        360,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,937
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,916,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,876,625
<SALES>                                      1,099,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,124,055
<CGS>                                          547,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,097,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,471
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,219
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,219
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# QSBL 063015

# QSBL 033115

# QSBL 123114

# QSBL 093014

# QSBL 063014

# QSBL 033114

# QSBL 123113

# QSBL 093013

# QSBL 063013

# QSBL 033113

# QSBL 123112

# QSBL 093012

# QSBL 063012

# QSBL 033112

# QSBL 123111

# QSBL 093011

# QSBL 063011

# QSBL 033111

# image1.png
#### Millard TATUM et al. v. STATE.

No. 23148.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 6, 1945.

Percy Foreman, of Plouston, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of the County Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County in a bond forfeiture case.

The record in this case is in the same condition as the one in Cause No. 23147, Millard Tatum et al. v. State, Tex.Cr.App. 187 S.W.2d 989, this day decided. The State’s Attorney has filed a like motion in this case as in Cause No. 23,147, and for the reasons therein stated, the motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### Korenkiewicz *v.*York Motor Express Company, Inc., Appellant.

Argued October 11, 1939.

Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker, Rhodes and Hirt, JJ.

*215
      *Charles E. Kenworthey,*for appellant.

*Nochem 8. Winnet,*for appellee.

January 30, 1940:

Per Curiam,

No appeal was taken from the order of the court of common pleas granting a new trial, on motion of the plaintiff, for inadequacy of the verdict. The order dismissing defendant’s motion for judgment in its favor, non obstante veredicto, is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Brown, who presided at the trial.
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Nebraska Refinery Vacuum Distillation Downstream Charge Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Nebraska Refinery Vacuum Distillation Downstream Charge Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 2,400  | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |       
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Power & Equipment Corp. &
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark J. Wright, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                                       /s/ Mark J. Wright
                                       ---------------------------
                                       Name: Mark J. Wright
                                       Chief Financial Officer and Principal
                                       Accounting Officer
                                       Date: March 24, 2008



     A signed original of the written statements required by Section 906 has
been provided to Western Power & Equipment Corp. & Subsidiary and will be
retained by Western Power & Equipment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeneLink, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John R. DePhillipo, as
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods shown in such report.


Date: November 12, 2002                 By:      /s/ John R. DePhillipo
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John R. DePhillipo, Chief Executive
                                           Officer and Chief Financial Officer


                                       18
#### Volodymr Sytnyczenko et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Charles Pearson, Defendant.

County Court, Columbia County,

March 24, 1958.

*Alan Hegeman*for plaintiffs.

*Michael Le Sawyer*for defendant.

William E. J. Connor, J.

This is the return of an order to show cause why a manifest clerical error in the report of a jury after the trial of an action for breach of contract should not be corrected by the court. The trial minutes indicate the following upon the return of the jury: *“*The Court: What is your verdict? Foreman: As Foreman of the Jury I have been directed to render a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $166.50, which represents the actual cost to him, $.50 per bale on the 373 bale shortage.”

At the time of the rendition of the verdict, it apparently did not occur to anyone, including the court, that 50 cents times 373 equals $186.50 and not $166.50. It therefore appears that the report of the jury contains a mere mathematical error and the court is empowered under section 105 of the Civil Practice Act to correct the error. The power to make such correction by the court has long been established by the courts. (See *Chamberlain*v. *Brady,*17 Jones *&*Sp. 484, affd. 94 N. Y. 649; *Selig*v. *Alexander,*185 App. Div. 322; *Warner*v. *New York Cent. R. R. Co.,*52 N. Y. 437; *White*v. *Hussey,*191 Misc. 193.)

Nor is it necessary that the error be discovered at the time that the verdict is rendered, but the same may be corrected, if called to the attention of the court, after the rendition of the verdict. (See *Hodgkins*v. *Mead,*119 N. Y. 166; *Dalrymple*v. *Williams,*63 N. Y. 361.)

*487It is now urged for the first time that the figure 373 bales is in excess of the number of bales demanded in the complaint. However the testimony on the subject was to the effect that there were 373 bales. No objection at the time of the testimony was made that said sum was not in conformity with the complaint and the jury was charged that there were 373 bales and there was no objection to said charge. The objection thus raised at this time is too late. The cleric is directed to enter judgment in the sum of $186.50, together with interest on said sum from the 26th day of February, 1957. (See *Mathis*v. *Matthews,*39 N. Y. S. 2d 242; *Mulroy*v. *Sessions,*38 N. Y. S. 2d 853; *Demms*v. *Blanchard,*150 Misc. 867; *Pawtucket Mut. Fire Ins Co.*v. *Keehn,*179 Misc. 551.)
United States District Court 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

V. § CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:21-CR-0530-S 

§ 

JOSHUA WARREN P ANNITTI (2) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY 

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a 

Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning 

Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed 

within 14 days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), the undersigned District Judge 

is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea 

of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the 

plea of guilty, and JOSHUA WARREN PANNITTI (2) is hereby adjudged guilty of21 U.S.C. 

§§ 841(a)(l) and (b)(l)(C) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, Possession with the Intent to Distribute a 

Controlled Substance, Aiding and Abetting. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the 

Court's Scheduling Order. 

The Defendant is ordered to remain in custody. 

SO ORDERED. 

SIGNED October 31, 2022. 

) 

ilRENGRENSCHOLER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:21-cr-00530-S Document 50 Filed 10/31/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 93
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Financial Statements of Eagle Family Foods, Inc. for the one hundred fifty-five
day period ended June 27, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0001059761
<NAME>    EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-24-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                           1,812
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                       230
<INVENTORY>                                     32,001
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,442
<PP&E>                                          26,319
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,528
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 399,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,246
<BONDS>                                        317,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   399,240
<SALES>                                         68,183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,183
<CGS>                                           38,376
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,044
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (40,690)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (14,246)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,444)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,444)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### GILBERT v. STATE.

No. 26255.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 11, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for a violation of the liquor law in Taylor County. The penalty assessed is a fine of $150 and confinement in the county jail for 30 days.

The complaint and information, as well as all other matters of procedure, appear to be in regular form. The record is before us without a statement of facts and bills of exception. Therefore, nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### McDANIEL v. STATE.

No. 26146.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 7, 1953.

No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Upon his plea of guilty before the court, appellant was convicted of cattle theft and punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
Case 4:22-cv-00499-P Document 25 Filed 08/17/23 Page 1 of 13 PageID 2220
 

 

Case 4:22-cv-00499-P Document 25 Filed 08/17/23 Page 2 of 13 PageID 2221
Case 4:22-cv-00499-P Document 25 Filed 08/17/23 Page 3 of 13 PageID 2222
Case 4:22-cv-00499-P Document 25 Filed 08/17/23 Page 4 of 13 PageID 2223
 

Case 4:22-cv-00499-P Document 25 Filed 08/17/23 Page 5 of 13 PageID 2224
Case 4:22-cv-00499-P Document 25 Filed 08/17/23 Page 6 of 13 PageID 2225
 

 

Case 4:22-cv-00499-P Document 25 Filed 08/17/23 Page 7 of 13 PageID 2226
 

Case 4:22-cv-00499-P Document 25 Filed 08/17/23 Page 8 of 13 PageID 2227
 

Case 4:22-cv-00499-P Document 25 Filed 08/17/23 Page 9 of 13 PageID 2228
 

Case 4:22-cv-00499-P Document 25 Filed 08/17/23 Page 10 of 13 PageID 2229
 

 

Case 4:22-cv-00499-P Document 25 Filed 08/17/23 Page 11 of 13 PageID 2230
Case 4:22-cv-00499-P Document 25 Filed 08/17/23 Page 12 of 13 PageID 2231
Case 4:22-cv-00499-P Document 25 Filed 08/17/23 Page 13 of 13 PageID 2232
-----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------- Electronically Filed Supreme Court 30049 18-MAY-2011 01:52 PM NO. 30049
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

T.A. NO. 07-0086 JOHN M. CORBOY and STEPHEN GARO AGHJAYAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
vs. DAVID M. LOUIE, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General, State of Hawai ' i; COUNTY OF MAUI; and COUNTY OF KAUAI, Defendants-Appellees. T.A. NO. 07-0099 GARRY P. SMITH and EARL F. ARAKAKI, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
vs. DAVID M. LOUIE, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General, State of Hawai' i; and CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, Defendants-Appellees. T.A. NO. 07-0102 J. WILLIAM SANBORN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs. DAVID M. LOUIE, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General, State of Hawai' i; and COUNTY OF HAWAII, Defendants- Appellees. T.A. NO. 08-0039 In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of STEPHEN GARO AGHJAYAN, Appellant-Appellant, and STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Intervenor-Appellee.-----------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------- T.A. NO. 08-0040 In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of JOHN M. CORBOY, Appellant-Appellant, and STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Intervenor-Appellee. T.A. NO. 08-0041 In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of GARRY P. SMITH, Appellant-Appellant, and STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Intervenor-Appellee. T.A. NO. 08-0042 In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of WILLIAM J. SANBORN, Appellant-Appellant, and STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Intervenor-Appellee. T.A. NO. 08-0043 In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of EARL F. ARAKAKI, Appellant-Appellant, and STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Intervenor-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE TAX APPEAL COURT (Tax Appeal Case No. 07-0086 (Consolidated Nos. 07-0086, 07-0099, 07-0102, 08-0039, 08-0040, 08-0041, 08-0042, 08-0043))
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, and Duffy, JJ., and Circuit Judge Nishimura, in place of Moon, C.J., recused and retired, with Acoba, J., concurring separately) Upon consideration of Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Motion for Reconsideration filed on May 9, 2011, and pursuant to Hawai' i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(d),

2This court, having reviewed the Motion, together with the Opinion, and the records and files in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai' i, May 18, 2011. H. William Burgess on the motion for plaintiffs-appellants. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Rhonda A. Nishimura
I concur, based on my concurring opinion filed on April 27, 2011. /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

3
#### AMMONS v. STATE.

No. 21878.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 4, 1942.

*535Jimmie Cunningham, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for possessing whisky for the purpose of sale in dry area, punishment assessed being five months in jail.

No bills of exception or statement of facts are found in the record. The record fails to show any motion to quash the State’s pleading, or any motion in arrest of judgment based upon any claimed defect therein.

In a brief filed in behalf of appellant an attack is made on the complaint and information on the ground that they do not sufficiently allege the holding of a prohibition election, the result thereof, the order of the court declaring the result, nor the publication of the order.

We discover no such vice in the pleadings as claimed by appellant.

The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50047

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

SAIMY DONAEL HERNANDEZ-PORTILLO,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:14-CR-1121-1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Saimy Donael Hernandez-Portillo

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Portillo has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 5, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50047 Document: 00514373058 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/05/2018
No. 16-50047

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-50047 Document: 00514373058 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/05/2018