alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

 Plaintiff, §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-68-Z-BR-(1)

§

MARTIN OCHOA-PEREZ §

§

 Defendant. §

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

On December 1, 2022, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and 

Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty (“Report and Recommendation”) in the above 

referenced cause. Defendant Martin Ochoa-Perez filed no objections to the Report and 

Recommendation within the fourteen-day period set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court 

independently examined all relevant matters of record in the above referenced cause—including the 

elements of the offense, Factual Resume, Plea Agreement, and Plea Agreement Supplement—and 

thereby determined that the Report and Recommendation is correct. Therefore, the Report and 

Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED by the United States District Court. Accordingly, the Court 

hereby FINDS that the guilty plea of Defendant Martin Ochoa-Perez was knowingly and voluntarily 

entered; ACCEPTS the guilty plea of Defendant Martin Ochoa-Perez; and ADJUDGES Defendant 

Martin Ochoa-Perez guilty of Count One in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(1) and 6 U.S.C. 

§§ 202(3), 202(4), and 557. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court’s sentencing 

scheduling order.

SO ORDERED, December 16, 2022.

_______________________________

MATTHEW J. KACSMARYK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:22-cr-00068-Z-BR Document 37 Filed 12/16/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 84
Case 3:22-cv-01351-C-BK Document 14 Filed 10/24/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 35
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

AMANDA PRESTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-1018-X-BK

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Plaintiff Amanda Preston filed an unopposed motion for attorney’s fees under 

the Equal Access to Justice Act. (Doc. 32). The United States Magistrate Judge 

made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation. (Doc. 33). The Magistrate 

Judge recommended that this Court grant Preston’s motion in the amount of 

$9,409.04. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed 

findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court 

ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge. 

Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees (Doc. 32) is GRANTED, and the Court 

ORDERS Defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration to pay

Preston $9,409.04 in attorney’s fees. Checks should be made payable to Preston and 

mailed to Preston’s counsel of record.

Case 3:22-cv-01018-X-BK Document 34 Filed 03/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1977
2

IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of March, 2024.

____________________________________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01018-X-BK Document 34 Filed 03/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1978
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 222 (Thursday, November 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29389]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Patent Licenses to BTG 
International, Inc.

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of prospective 
licenses to BTG International Inc. to the Government-owned inventions 
described in:

    U.S. Patent No. 5,932,006 entitled, ``BaF<INF>2</INF>/GaAs 
Electronic Components'', date issued: August 3, 1999.
    U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/197,440 entitled, ``Gallium 
Arsenide Semiconductor Devices Fabricated with Insulator Layer'', 
filing date: November 23, 1998, Navy Case No. 79412.
    U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/563,740 entitled, 
``Electronic Devices With Diffusion Barrier and Process for Making 
Same'', filing date: May 3, 2000, Navy Case No. 82111.
    U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/631,121 entitled, ``Gallium 
Arsenide Semiconductor Devices Fabricated With Insulator Layer'', 
filing date: August 2, 2000, Navy Case No. 82528.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later 
than January 16, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the Office of Patent 
Counsel, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Laboratory, CD222, 
17320 Dahlgren Road, VA 22448-5100, telephone (540) 653-8061.

    Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404.

    Dated: November 3, 2000.
J.L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-29389 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 127

To authorize the President to proclaim the last Friday of April 1993 as

‘‘National Arbor Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1993

Mr. KLEIN introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To authorize the President to proclaim the last Friday of

April 1993 as ‘‘National Arbor Day’’.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the President is hereby authorized and requested to

4 issue a proclamation designating the last Friday of April

5 1993 as ‘‘National Arbor Day’’ and calling upon the peo6 ple of the United States to observe such a day with appro7 priate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|New Mexico Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|New Mexico Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 7      | 5      | 6      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 4      | 4      | 3      | 3      | 3      | NA     | 3      | NA     | 3     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 3      | 3      | 3      | 3      | 3      | 3      | 3      | 3      | 3     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 3      | 3      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00223-N

§

QUINTINE HORNSBY (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

QUINTINE HORNSBY (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), 

has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count(s) 1s of the Superseding 

Information After cautioning and examining QUINTINE HORNSBY (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects 

mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense(s) charged is

supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend 

that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that QUINTINE HORNSBY (1) be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. § 846 Conspiracy 

to Distribute a Controlled Substance and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by 

the district judge, 

☐ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. 

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release. 

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c). 

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release. 

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released. 

Date: July 11, 2023 

 ______________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B). 

Case 3:22-cr-00223-N Document 63 Filed 07/11/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 139
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), S. James Miller, Jr., Chief Executive Officerof ImageWare Systems, Inc. (the *“**Company**”*), and Wayne Wetherell, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

1.               The Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSBfor the period ended September 30, 2004 (the *“**Report**”*) fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of theCompany at the end of the periods covered by the Report and the results ofoperations of the Company for the periods covered by the Report.

 

 

Dated:  November 15, 2004

 

 
| /s/  S. James Miller     |                     | /s/  Wayne Wetherell |   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|----------------------|--------|
| S.  James Miller, Jr.    | Wayne  Wetherell         |
| Chief  Executive Officer | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to ImageWare Systems, Inc. and will be retained by ImageWare Systems,Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SONDREA MILLER, et al §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. § 3:22-cv-00943-X

§

TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, et al §

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES

The undersigned counsel of record certifies that the following listed persons have an 

interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the Judge of this 

Court may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal.

A. Parties:

Plaintiff:

 Defendants:

Sondrea Miller, individually and as independent

administrator of, and on behalf of the Estate of 

Javonte Lakendrick Myers, and Javonte 

Lakendrick Myers’ heir(s) at law

Tarrant County, Texas

Erik L. Gay

Darien A Kirk

B. Attorneys for:

Plaintiff:

Defendant Tarrant County: 

Defendant Erik Gay:

T. Dean Malone 

LAW OFFICES OF DEAN MALONE, P.C. 

900 Jackson Street, Suite 730 

Dallas, Texas 75202 

(214) 670-9989

Fax (214) 670-9904

M. Keith Ogle, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty

Tarrant County District Attorney’s Office

401 W. Belknap, 9th Floor – Civil Division

Fort Worth, Tx 76196

(817) 884-1233

Fax (817) 884-1675

James T. Jeffrey, Jr.

LAW OFFICES OF JIM JEFFREY

3200 W. Arkansas Lane

Arlington, Texas 76016

(817) 261-3200

Fax (817) 275-5826

Case 3:22-cv-00943-X Document 9 Filed 05/11/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 85
Defendant Darien A. Kirk: Unknown at this time

Respectfully submitted,

__/s/James T. Jeffrey, Jr.__

 JAMES T. JEFFREY, JR.

 Texas Bar No. 10612300

LAW OFFICES OF JIM JEFFREY

3200 W. Arkansas Lane

Arlington, Texas 76016

(817) 261-3200

Fax (817) 275-5826

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

ERIK L. GAY

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this has been served on counsel of record for all 

parties by electronic notice through the ECF System for the Northern District of Texas on this 11th

day of May, 2022.

__/s/James T. Jeffrey, Jr.__ 

JAMES T. JEFFREY, JR.

Case 3:22-cv-00943-X Document 9 Filed 05/11/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 86
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 10

Designating March 25, 1993, as ‘‘Greek Independence Day: A National Day

of Celebration of Greek and American Democracy’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating March 25, 1993, as ‘‘Greek Independence Day:

A National Day of Celebration of Greek and American

Democracy’’.

Whereas the ancient Greeks developed the concept of democracy, in which the supreme power to govern was vested

in the people;

Whereas the Founding Fathers of the United States drew

heavily upon the political experience and philosophy of

ancient Greece in forming our representative democracy;

Whereas these and other ideals have forged a close bond between our two nations and their peoples;
2

•HJ 10 IH

Whereas March 25, 1993, marks the 172nd anniversary of

the beginning of the revolution which freed the Greek

people from the Ottoman Empire; and

Whereas it is proper and desirable to celebrate with the

Greek people and to reaffirm the democratic principles

from which our two great nations were born: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That March 25, 1993, is designated as ‘‘Greek Independ4 ence Day: A National Day of Celebration of Greek and

5 American Democracy’’. The President is authorized and

6 requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people

7 of the United States to observe the day with appropriate

8 ceremonies and activities.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-109-Y 

 § 

DONTE ISAIAH FORD (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED May 13, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00109-Y Document 26 Filed 05/13/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 62
//EX3-1(i)_10854.CEC
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.1(i)

                                                   Corporate Control No. 0287284


                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                                   CHARTER OF
                        VERITAS MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
                (Pursuant to the provisions of Section 48-20-106
                   of the Tennessee Business Corporation Act)


     The undersigned, duly authorized to act on behalf of the above-referenced
corporation, hereby certifies the following:

     1. The name of the corporation is:
        Veritas Music Entertainment, Inc.

     2. The Board of Directors and stockholders of the corporation have approved
and ratified the following amendment to the corporation's charter:

          Section 1 of the corporation's Charter is hereby deleted in its
          entirety, and is hereby replaced with the following:

          "1.  The name of the corporation is: Imprint Records, Inc."

     3. The above amendment to the corporation's Charter was duly adopted by the
corporation's Board of Directors on April 23, 1996, and duly adopted by the
corporation's stockholders at the 1996 annual meeting, held June 28, 1996.

Dated:  June 28, 1996


                                    Veritas Music Entertainment, Inc.


                                    By: /s/ Roy W. Wunsch
                                        -----------------------------
                                            Roy W. Wunsch
                                            Chairman and Chief
                                              Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6142

NOAH R. ROBINSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

J. HUTCHINSON, Warden/Custodian,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (6:19-cv-02831-RMG)

Submitted: July 21, 2020 Decided: July 23, 2020

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Noah R. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Noah R. Robinson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting 

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Robinson’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

(2018) petition without prejudice because Robinson’s nearly identical motion was pending 

in the Western District of Tennessee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. 

Hutchinson, No. 6:19-cv-02831-RMG (D.S.C. Jan. 14, 2020). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
United States District Court 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

DUSTIN SULLIVAN, #2458560 § 

v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-CV-1162-S-BN 

DALLAS COUNTY SHERIFF’S : 

DEPARTMENT, e¢ al. § 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION 

 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in 

this case. No objections were filed. The Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and 

recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, 

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. 

SO ORDERED. 

SIGNED November 7, 2024. 

Mt Qo 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cv-01162-S-BN Document 101 Filed 11/07/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 592
Case 3:22-cr-00227-K Document 82 Filed 12/06/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 216
U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: March 11, 2015

CONTACT: Treasury Public Affairs (202) 622-2960

FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 11, 2015

WASHINGTON – Secretary Lew today convened a meeting of the Financial Stability Oversight 

Council (Council) in an executive session at the Treasury Department. 

During the meeting, the Council received a presentation by staff of the Board of Governors of 

the Federal Reserve System on its bank stress-testing process for 2015, including the results of 

the Dodd-Frank Act Stress Tests (DFAST), which were released on March 5, 2015, and the 

process for the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). 

The Council then discussed central counterparties (CCPs) and ongoing regulatory work

regarding key risk-management areas.

The Council also received an update from staff regarding the development of the Council’s 2015 

annual report. Following the update, the Council discussed potential emerging threats to 

financial stability and recommendations that may be included in the report. The Council’s 2015 

annual report is expected to be published this spring. 

Finally, the Council voted and approved the minutes of its last two meetings, on January 21 and 

February 4.

Additional information regarding the Council, including the minutes approved today, is available 

at www.fsoc.gov. 

###