alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 114 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 114

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   guaranteeing access to medical care to all citizens of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 17, 1993

Mr. Stark introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   guaranteeing access to medical care to all citizens of the United 
                                States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years from the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to medical 
care shall be guaranteed.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by 
appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
    ``Section 3. This amendment shall take effect one year after the 
date of ratification.''.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Power & Equipment Corp. &
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark J. Wright, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Mark J. Wright
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Name: Mark J. Wright
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                Date: December 15, 2004


     A signed original of the written statements required by Section 906 has
been provided to Western Power & Equipment Corp. & Subsidiary and will be
retained by Western Power & Equipment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 21 - Subsidiaries of Registrant**

 

Macatawa Bank - 100% owned 

Incorporated as a Michigan Banking Corporation 

51 E. Main Street 

Zeeland, Michigan 49464 

 

Grand Bank - 100% owned 

(Grand Bank was merged into Macatawa Bank 

effective January 1, 2003) 

 

Macatawa Bank Brokerage Services, Inc. - 100% owned 

Incorporated as aMichigan corporation 

160 South Waverly Road 

Holland, Michigan 49423 

 

Macatawa Bank Mortgage Company 

100% owned by Macatawa Bank 

Incorporated as a Michigan corporation 

160 South Waverly Road 

Holland, Michigan 49423 

 

Grand Bank Mortgage Company 

100% owned by Macatawa Bank 

(In process of being merged into Macatawa Bank 

Mortgage Company) 

 

Macatawa Financial Services Group, Inc. - 100% owned

Incorporated as a Michigan corporation effective January 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeneLink, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John R. DePhillipo, as
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods shown in such report.

Date: August 13, 2003                       By: /s/ John R. DePhillipo
                                                --------------------------------
                                                John R. DePhillipo,
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                President
Washington State Department of Ecology

Hazardous Waste and Toxics Reduction Program

2010 Revision Authorization Application

Contents

Section I Program Description

Section II Attorney General’s Statement and Revision Checklists

Section III Statutes and Regulations

 Administrative Procedure Act Chapter 34.05 RCW, 2009

 Disclosure, Campaign Finances Lobbying, Records Chapter 

42.17 RCW, 2009

 Department of Ecology Chapter 43.21A RCW, 2009

 Environmental Hearings Office Pollution Control Hearings 

Board Chapter 43.21B RCW, 2009

 Hazardous Waste Management Chapter 70.105 RCW, 2009

 Hazardous Waste Cleanup Model Toxic Control Act Chapter 

70.105D RCW, 2009

 Dangerous Waste Regulations Chapter 173-303 WAC, 2007

 Dangerous Waste Regulations Chapter 173-303 WAC, 2009

Section IV Chemical Test Methods, Publication # 97-407, 2009

Biological Test Methods Publication # 81-12, 2009

Section V New Laws/House Bills (that impact federally authorized program)

 Administrative Procedure Act RCW 34.05.110 Paperwork 

Violation Law

 HB2603- 2010 revision to RCW 34.05.110

Section VI Comments and Responses on Proposed Rule Amendments (2009)

Section VII Reporting Forms and Notification 

 Dangerous Waste Annual Report 

2009 Forms and Instructions

Ecology Publication # 03-04-018
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

BRAYLON RAY COULTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

NFN HALE, )

)

Defendant. ) Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-1110-C-BK

ORDER

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma

pauperis should be DENIED and his complaint should be DISMISSED unless, within twentyone (21) days of this Court accepting the recommendation, Plaintiff pays the filing and

administrative fees or submits a completed in forma pauperis application and certificate of trust

account. Plaintiff has failed to file objections to the United States Magistrate Judge’s Findings,

Conclusions, and Recommendation and the time to do so has now expired—including six extra days

allowed for normal mail time delays. 

The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error

and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation

are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. 

For the reasons stated therein, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in

forma pauperis should be DENIED and his complaint should be DISMISSED unless, within

Case 3:22-cv-01110-C-BK Document 11 Filed 09/14/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 37
twenty-one (21) days of this Order, Plaintiff pays the filing and administrative fees of $402.00 to

the Clerk of Court or submits a completed in forma pauperis application and certificate of trust

account. 

Failure to comply will result in this civil action being dismissed under Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 41(b).

SO ORDERED. 

Dated September 14, 2022. 

SAM R. CUMMINGS

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01110-C-BK Document 11 Filed 09/14/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 38
#### PARSONS v. PARSONS.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 19, 1951.

*988O. M. Smith, Russellville, for appellant.

J. G. Clark, Russellville, for appellee.

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

Virginia Parsons was granted a divorce from Bernice Parsons. She was allowed $50 a month for alimony and a fee of $150 for her attorney. On this appeal-the husband is insisting that, because of his alleged insolvency, there should have been no allowance for alimony nor for an attorney’s fee.

The appellant’s proof showed that he made only moderate wages as a farm hand and as a day laborer. He and another man had bought some trucks and he could not meet his part of their -cost. On the other -hand, the wife’s proof showed that he had drawn $100 per month from the trucking partnership and had paid a substantial part of his indebtedness to the firm.

We think the chancellor was amply justified in making the allowances for alimony and the attorney’s fee.

Judgment affirmed.
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 14

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating

to voluntary prayer in public schools.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 1, 1991

Mr. COMBEST introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relating to voluntary prayer in public schools.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 14 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘Nothing in this Constitution shall prohibit the inclu3 sion of voluntary prayer in any public school program or

4 activity. Neither the United States nor any State shall

5 prescribe the content of any such prayer.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JOHN DOE,

Plaintiff,

v.

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00297-O

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff John Doe’s emergency Motion to Hold Non-Party Jane Roe 

in Contempt of Court, Motion to Compel Deposition of Non-Party Jane Roe and Brief in Support 

Thereof (ECF No. 125), filed November 9, 2022. To expedite resolution of this motion, the Court 

ORDERS non-party Jan Roe to respond no later than November 14, 2022. Plaintiff may reply 

no later than November 17, 2022. Defendant may respond no later than November 14, 2022, if 

it feels it needs to.

SO ORDERED on this 9th day of November, 2022. 

Case 4:22-cv-00297-O Document 128 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 7158
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7290

MICHAEL ISIAH LAWRENCE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

S. K. YOUNG, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-02-27-7)

Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: November 26, 2002

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Isiah Lawrence, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Isiah Lawrence seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Lawrence

has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right. See Lawrence v. Young, No. CA-02-27-7 (W.D.

Va. filed July 31, 2002; entered Aug. 1, 2002). Accordingly, we

deny Lawrence’s motions to vacate the district court’s order and to

expand the record, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss

the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|U.S. Refinery Kerosene Shell Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|U.S. Refinery Kerosene Shell Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | NA     | 7,341  | 7,153  | NA     | 5,784  | NA     | 4,300 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3,841  | 3,714  | 4,178  | 3,459  | 3,747  | 3,554  | 4,516  | 4,290  | 3,768  | 3,330 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,903  | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
Notice of Appearance - Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DAVID DEVANEY, JR. (02)

 No. 4:22-CR-213-P

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

I, Brian D. Poe, hereby enter my appearance as an attorney of record in this 

matter. I am lead counsel in the state matter associated with this case, and I will be 

assisting CJA attorney Matt Smid with this matter on a pro bono basis. I request that I be 

notified of any and all settings in the above styled case, and receive all filings made in 

this matter. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Brian D. Poe

BRIAN D. POE

Texas Bar No. 24056908

The Bryce Building

909 Throckmorton Street

Fort Worth, Texas 76102

Telephone: 817-870-2022

Facsimile: 817-977-6501

Email: bpoe@bpoelaw.com

Case 4:22-cr-00213-P Document 31 Filed 08/08/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 51
Notice of Appearance - Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on August 8, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing document with 

the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, 

using the electronic case filing system of the Court. The electronic case filing system 

sent a “Notice of Electronic Filing” to all attorneys who have consented in writing to 

accept this Notice as service of this document. 

/s/ Brian D. Poe

BRIAN D. POE

Case 4:22-cr-00213-P Document 31 Filed 08/08/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 52
DEFENDANT’S CERTIFICATE OF WRITTEN DISCOVERY – Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

 

 

EUGENIO VARGAS, § 

 § 

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, § 

 § 

 § 

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00430 

 § 

 § 

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL 

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, JULIE 

HEDRICK, AND ERIK HARRIS, 

§ 

§ 

§ 

 

 § 

Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs. § 

 

PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT’S 

CERTIFICATE OF WRITTEN DISCOVERY

COMES NOW, the Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, EUGENIO VARGAS, 

by and through their undersigned counsel and hereby certifies that on this 28th day 

of July 2022 the following written discovery was served in this case on the

Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs, ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FLIGHT 

ATTENDANTS, JULIE HEDRICK, AND ERIK HARRIS, by and through their

counsels, via email to Sandford R. Denison, Margot A. Nikitas and William W. 

Osborne at denison@baabdenison.com, MNikitas@apfa.org, and 

b.osborne@osbornelaw.com, respectively the following:

1. Plaintiff’s/Counterclaim Defendant’s First Requests for Production to

Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs.

Case 4:22-cv-00430-Y Document 26 Filed 07/28/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 252
DEFENDANT’S CERTIFICATE OF WRITTEN DISCOVERY – Page 2

Respectfully submitted,

KD PHILLIPS LAW FIRM, PLLC

By: /s/ Kerri Phillips______________ 

Kerri Phillips, Esq.

Texas Bar No. 24065906

Phone: (972) 327-5800

Email: kerri@KDphillipslaw.com

5700 Tennyson Parkway, Suite 300

Plano, Texas 75024

Fax: (940) 400-0089

For Service of Filings: 

notice@KDphillipslaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR 

PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIM 

DEFENDANT 

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 28th day of July 2022 a true and correct copy 

of the foregoing instrument was served upon Plaintiff’s attorney via the e-filing 

manager and email to at denison@baabdenison.com, MNikitas@apfa.org, and 

b.osborne@osbornelaw.com, respectively.

/s/ Kerri Phillips ________

Kerri Phillips, Esq.

Case 4:22-cv-00430-Y Document 26 Filed 07/28/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 253
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,321
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  178,918
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    181,038
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               391,997
<PP&E>                                         386,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 829,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          238,148
<BONDS>                                        143,664
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           358
<OTHER-SE>                                     394,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   829,243
<SALES>                                        641,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               641,581
<CGS>                                          459,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  595,164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1,269)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,548
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,138
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,054
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,084
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,084
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89


</TABLE>