alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     USS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999 
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999 
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1          
<CASH>                                         1,327,226  
<SECURITIES>                                   0          
<RECEIVABLES>                                  162,683    
<ALLOWANCES>                                   25,000     
<INVENTORY>                                    937,624    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,440,260  
<PP&E>                                         961,758    
<DEPRECIATION>                                 579,435    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,833,036  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          307,802    
<BONDS>                                        240,000    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0          
<PREFERRED>                                    0          
<COMMON>                                       26,515     
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,258,719  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,833,036  
<SALES>                                        307,600    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               320,353    
<CGS>                                          125,519    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  506,682    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0          
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0          
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,225      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (199,082)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0          
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (193,554)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0          
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0          
<CHANGES>                                      0          
<NET-INCOME>                                   (193,554)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.07)      
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.07)      
                                               


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 174 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 58

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 174

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

           Increasing the statutory limit on the public debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 19, 1993

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

                                     

                                                        Calendar No. 58
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 174

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                April 1 (legislative day, March 3), 1993

                    Received and read the first time

                             April 19, 1993

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
           Increasing the statutory limit on the public debt.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That subsection (b) of section 
3101 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking out the 
dollar limitation contained in such subsection and inserting in lieu 
thereof $4,731,900,000,000.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 31, 1993.

            Attest:

                                            DONNALD K. ANDERSON

                                                                Clerk.
```
# C_2013129EN.01000403.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/4

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 February 2013 — Jarosław Majtczak v Feng Shen Technology Co. Ltd, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-266/12 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 51(1)(b) - Applicant’s bad faith when filing the Community trade mark - Figurative mark ‘FS’ - Application for a declaration of invalidity)

2013/C 129/08

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Jarosław Majtczak (represented by: J. Radłowski, radca prawny)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Feng Shen Technology Co. Ltd (represented by P. Rath, Rechtsanwalt), Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent,)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2012 in Case T-227/09 Feng Shen Technology v OHIM — Majtczak (FS), by which the General Court annulled Decision R 529/2008-4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 1 April 2009 dismissing the appeal brought against the decision of the Cancellation Division which had rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity brought by the applicant against the figurative mark ‘FS’ for goods in Class 26

Feng Shen Technology

OHIM — Majtczak (FS)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Jarosław Majtczak shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Jarosław Majtczak shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 258, 25.8.2012.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 129 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 129

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
restrict the requirement of citizenship at birth by virtue of birth in 
  the United States to persons with citizen or legal resident mothers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1993

 Mr. Gallegly (for himself, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Archer, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. 
Doolittle, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Kasich, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Young of Alaska, 
 Mr. McCandless, Mr. Stump, Mr. Emerson, and Mr. McCollum) introduced 
the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
restrict the requirement of citizenship at birth by virtue of birth in 
  the United States to persons with citizen or legal resident mothers.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. All persons born in the United States, and subject to 
the jurisdiction thereof, of mothers who are citizens or legal 
residents of the United States and all persons naturalized in the 
United States are citizens of the United States and of the State 
wherein they reside. The first sentence of section 1 of the fourteenth 
article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby 
repealed.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.
    ``Section 3. This article shall apply to persons born after the 
date of its ratification.''.

                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|U.S. Refinery Other Liquids Shell Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|U.S. Refinery Other Liquids Shell Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 88,301 | 97,087 | 90,590 | 93,243 | 93,472 | 95,790 | 91,073 | 89,075
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 90,481 | 89,297 | 86,930 | 87,603 | 99,787 | 91,509 | NA     | 90,044 | NA     | 90,934
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 99,969 | 88,690 | 93,933 | 93,140 | 91,562 | 90,694 | 94,391 | 94,504 | 95,540 | 96,973
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 96,157 | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

     In connection with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report of Moro Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended  September  30, 2003 (the
"Report")  as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof, I, David W. Menard,  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the  Company,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  Subsection  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 14, 2003
                                                    /s/ David W. Menard
                                                    -------------------
                                                    David W. Menard
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    and Chief Financial Officer
#### WRENN v. STATE.

No. 21888.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 4, 1942.

B. R. Reeves, of Palestine, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for possessing whisky in a container to which no tax stamp was affixed. Punishment assessed was a fine of one hundred dollars.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty, notwithstanding which the case is brought to this court by a record which contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In this condition of the record nothing is presented for review.

. The judgment is affirmed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RICHARD LEE HARDERS
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 768

[ December 20, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; John S. Kastrenakes , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502016CF011603BXXXMB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Christine C. Geraghty, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Maryellen M.

Farre ll, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER
, C IKLIN and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### DEMING v. STATE.

No. 22968.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 6, 1944.

Mat Davis, of Gilmer, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a penalty of six years in the penitentiary on a charge of burglary.

The indictment in the case was returned on the fourth day of July, 1944, alleging the offense to have been committed nearly a year previous thereto. On the eleventh day of July, following the indictment, a bench warrant was issued for appellant who was then in jail in another county and he was returned to Shelby County and placed on trial on the seventeenth day of July. The accused had been represented for some time by Mat Davis, an attorney of Gilmer, Texas, who was unable to attend court on account of illness as reflected by a motion for continuance found in the record. This motion was overruled by the court and that is the chief grounds urged as error but its merits can not be considered on this appeal because it is not brought forward by a bill of exception. Moore v. State, 144 Tex.Cr.R. 145,

161 S.W.2d 83; Reed v. State, 144 Tex. Cr.R. 245, 162 S.W.2d 109; Martin v. State, 144 Tex.Cr.R. 313, 162 S.W.2d 722; Barrera v. State, Tex.Crim.App., 174 S.W. 2d 735; Chavez v. State, Tex.Crim.App., 181 S.W.2d 85.

We find other bills of exception in the record pertaining to matters that will not be discussed for the reason that we think the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction. The State relied solely upon a written confession made by the accused, dated April 15, 1944. It is sufficiently proven that the crime of burglary was committed but there is no evidence connecting appellant with the crime save and except the confession. This varies from the allegations in the indictment and can not support a conviction. The time of the commission of the offense, as reflected by the confession, is subsequent to the date the confession was made and therefore an impossible date. It was also subsequent to the date of the return of the indictment, and to the trial of the case, hence cannot support the conviction. Kincaid v. State, 8 Tex.App. 465; Clement v. State, 22 Tex. App. 23, 2 S.W. 379. See also Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., Article 396, Note 12; and Vol. 21, Texas Digest, Indictment and Information, “§^176.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.
Order entered October 3 1 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00619
- CV
LUIS A. SANTIAGO, ET AL. , Appellant s V. NOVASTAR MORTGAGE, I NC., ET AL . , Appellee s On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296
- 02073
- 2011 

### O RDER
We GRANT appellants’ October 28, 2013, unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a reply brief. Appellants shall file their reply brief on or before November 21, 2013.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- M IERS JUSTICE
# L_2008273EN.01S00301.xml

| 15.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 273/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 273/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
Take notice that on January 24, 2000, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (Tennessee), 1001 Louisiana, Houston, Texas 77002, filed in Docket No. CP-48-000, to amend its original application (Application) filed in that docket on December 10, 1999. Tennessee states that the purpose of the amendment is to revise that text of the Application and certain exhibits to correct an inadvertent mistake in the rate amounts originally provided. The                     Start Printed Page 6366                    rate is changed from a fixed monthly reservation charge of $1,1967 per dekatherm (Dth) and a fixed commodity charge of $.0031 per Dth to a fixed monthly reservation charge of $1.1298 per Dth and a fixed commodity charge of $.0053. Tennessee also states that it seeks to amend certain language in the Application and in an exhibit to the transportation agreement included with the Application in order to clarify the surcharges that it intends to discount under the negotiated rate agreement proposed in the Application. Tennessee requests that the Commission approve the Application as amended by September 1, 2000.                

Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with reference to said application should on or before February 24, 2000, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in and subject to jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission by Section 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be held without notice before the Commission or its designee on this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter finds that a grant of the certificate is required by the public convenience and necessity. If a motion for leave to intervene is timely filed, or if the Commission on its motion believes that a formal hearing is required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.

Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, it will be unnecessary for Tennessee to appear or be represented at the hearing.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-2888  Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before December 11, 2000 to be assured of consideration. 

## Internal Revenue Service (IRS) 

*OMB Number:*                     1545-1691.                 

*Regulation Project Number:*                     REG-120882-97 Final.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                 

*Title:*                     Continuity of Interest.                 

*Description:*                     Taxpayers who entered into a binding agreement on or after January 28, 1998 (the effective date of § 1.368-1T), and before the effective date of the final regulations under § 1.368-1(e) may request a private letter ruling permitting them to apply § 1.368-1(e) to their transaction. A private letter ruling will not be issued unless the taxpayer establishes to the satisfaction of the IRS that there is not a significant risk of different parties to the transaction taking inconsistent positions, for U.S. tax purposes with respect to the applicability of § 1.368-1(e) to the transaction.                 

*Respondents:*                    Business or other for-profit.                 

*Estimated Number of Respondents:*                     10.                 

*Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent:*                     150 hours.                 

*Frequency of Response:*                     Other (once).                 

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                     1,500 hours.                 

*Clearance Officer:*                     Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service, Room 5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.                          ( print page 67475)    

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                 

Lois K. Holland, 

Departmental Reports, Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-28824 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P