alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 215 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 215

 To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage stamp in honor 
                     of Justice Thurgood Marshall.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 1993

  Mr. Blackwell introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage stamp in honor 
                     of Justice Thurgood Marshall.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the United States Postal 
Service shall issue a commemorative stamp in honor of Justice Thurgood 
Marshall. The stamp shall bear a likeness of Justice Marshall that 
shall be derived from a rendering of the image of Justice Marshall 
offered by Mr. Steven Johnson of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The stamp 
shall be issued and sold for such period as the United States Postal 
Service shall determine.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 153 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 153

  To designate the week of March 28, 1993, through April 3, 1993, as 
                      ``Distance Learning Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 1993

 Mr. Brown of California (for himself and Mrs. Morella) introduced the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post 
                        Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  To designate the week of March 28, 1993, through April 3, 1993, as 
                      ``Distance Learning Week''.

Whereas the delivery of education and training through electronically mediated 
        instruction has opened new opportunities for kindergarten through 
        twelfth grade education, higher education, and the retraining of 
        America's workforce;
Whereas the United States Distance Learning Association has played a leadership 
        role in legislative and policy initiatives to expand the awareness and 
        use of distance learning;
Whereas the United States Distance Learning Association has chosen the week of 
        March 28, 1993, through April 3, 1993, as a week of special recognition 
        for the achievements of distance learning professionals; and
Whereas April 1, 2, and 3, 1993, will be the dates of the Third Annual 
        International Distance Learning Conference, which will convene in the 
        Washington, D. C. area: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week of March 28, 
1993, through April 3, 1993, is designated as ``Distance Learning 
Week''. The President is authorized and requested to issue a 
proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe 
the week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
( TRANSITION AGREEMENT 

This TRANSITION AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") is 

entered into between President ROBERT ROSS (hereinafter referred to as "ROSS"), and 

the ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, through its Voting Board 

of Directors and on behalf of any and al! of its officers, directors, employees, agents, 

members, and attorneys, in their official and individual capacities, together with their 

successors both jointly and severally (hereinafter collectively and individually referred to as 

"APFA"). 

WHEREAS, President ROSS and APFA, through its Voting Board of Directors, find it 

mutually beneficial and in the best interests of the membership to enter into this Transition 

Agreement; and 

WHEREAS, President ROSS has previously announced his intention not to seek reelection for APF A President, and as such the parties have agreed on the terms of this 

Agreement. 

NOW THEREFORE, In consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this 

----._ Agreement, President ROSS and APFA (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the Parties"), 

\.._ intending to be legally bound, po hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 

-------.._ 

1. ROSS hereby voluntarily and irrevocably resigns from his position as the

National President of APFA effective at the close of the 2018 APFA

Convention, and agrees to announce his resignation by the close as well.

2. ROSS will have access through the close of business on March 9, 2018 to his

APFA office, files, and computer to finalize his affairs. Starting upon the

announcement of the resignation, all emails, telephonic calls, correspondence

and affairs regarding or directed to the APF A National President shall be

immediately routed to the successor APFA National President.

3. APFA agrees that ROSS will continue to receive from APFA his current full

salary and benefits, including full insurance coverage, through July 31, 2018.

4. APFA agrees to pay ROSS all of his accrued and unused sick and accrued

and unused vacation time, from April 1, 2016 through July 31, 2018.

5. APFA agrees to pay Ross, upon his request, a one-time lump sum in the total

amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), which represents ROSS's

moving expenses. ROSS shall present the moving expenses to APFA for

Page 1 of4 March 1, 2018:1.0 

Exhibit 1A

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 88-2 Filed 04/14/23 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1994
Exhibit 1A

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 88-2 Filed 04/14/23 Page 2 of 4 PageID 1995
Exhibit 1A

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 88-2 Filed 04/14/23 Page 3 of 4 PageID 1996
Exhibit 1A

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 88-2 Filed 04/14/23 Page 4 of 4 PageID 1997
# Memorandum

To: Four Corners Power Plant Permit File, NN 14-01 and T-0002-NN From: Lisa Beckham Date: July31, 2014 Re: Summary of Phone Call with Victoria Gutierrez

On July28, 2014, I received a phone call from Victoria Gutierrez requestingthe public hearing scheduled totake place on August28, 2014 in Fruitland, NM, be moved tothe ShiprockChapter House in Shiprock, NM. Ms. Gutierrez provided thefollowing reasonsfor her request: 1. She would like to get as much community involvement as possible. 2. The public hearing in Fruitland is not in a convenient location

- (Fruitland and Shiprock are about 17 miles apart) 3. The Nenahnazed Chapter House is a small out ofthe way Chapter Housethat not many people go to. 4. The Shiprock Chapter House is 2-3 timesthe size ofthe Nenahnazed Chapter House and is located offa major highway. In addition, the Fruitland hearing doesn’t necessarily have to be moved, adding a hearing at the Shiprock Chapter House would suffice. I informed Ms. Gutierrezthat EPAwould consider her request. On July 31, 2014 I left a voicemail at the phone number provided by Ms. Gutierrez notifying her that EPAwas adding athird public hearing in Shiprock, NM atthe Performing Arts Center.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 214 (Friday, November 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28351]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

``FEDERAL REGISTER'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 65 FR 65843; 65 
FR 64687.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 1 p.m., Wednesday, 
November 1, 2000.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The open meeting previously scheduled for 1 
p.m., Wednesday, November 1, 2000 has been postponed until 1 p.m., 
Monday, November 6, 2000.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-28351 Filed 11-1-00; 11:24 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
#### GRIBBLE et al. v. STATE.

No. 22403.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 24, 1943.

E. Newt Spivey, of Texarkana, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for robbery by assault. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of five years.

The record is before this court without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question has been presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 263 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 263

       Providing for an adjournment or recess of the two Houses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 1994

 Mr. Gephardt submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
       Providing for an adjournment or recess of the two Houses.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, June 
30, 1994, it stand adjourned until 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, July 12, 
1994, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns 
at the close of business on Thursday, June 30, 1994, Friday, July 1, 
1994, Saturday, July 2, 1994, or Sunday, July 3, 1994, pursuant to a 
motion made by the majority leader or his designee, in accordance with 
this resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, 
July 11, 1994, or at such time on that day as may be specified by the 
majority leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the minority leader of 
the House and the minority leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:95-cv-01861-G Document 20 Filed 02/06/97 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1
Case 3:95-cv-01861-G Document 20 Filed 02/06/97 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-NXS2

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of July 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go  far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
----

Action brought on 15 August 2006 — Adelaida Lopez Teruel v Office of Harmonisation for the Internal Market

(Case F-97/06)

(2006/C 237/42)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Adelaida Lopez Teruel (El Casar, Spain) (represented by: G. Vandersanden, L. Levi and C. Ronzi, lawyers)

Defendant: Office of Harmonisation for the Internal Market

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, an official of OHIM, sent a request to the administration on 8 June 2005 asking that an Invalidity Committee be convened so as to decide on the existence of an invalidity within the meaning of Article 78 of the Staff Regulations. OHIM refused to convene such a Committee, pointing out first, that the appointing authority has discretion in such matters, and, second, that the disease she referred to could not give rise to invalidity proceedings, given that it had already given rise to arbitration proceedings.

In her application, the applicant raises three pleas in law, of which the first, alleging infringement of Article 78 of the Staff Regulations, is made up of two parts. In the first part, it is argued that the official in question has the right to bring a matter before the Invalidity Committee, irrespective of the right to do so also given to the appointing authority, given that Articles 78 and 59 of the Staff Regulations have a different ratio legis and govern different types of situations. In the second part, the applicant takes issue with OHIM for having committed a manifest error of assessment and having exceeded the bounds of its powers, in that it substituted its assessment for that of medical experts.

The second plea alleges infringement of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials and the principle of good administration. Specifically, OHIM did not weigh in the balance the interests in issue and did not at any time take into account the applicant's extremely delicate state of health.

The third plea alleges infringement of the principles of non-discrimination and equal treatment. According to the applicant, all other European Community officials can invoke the right to have their cases examined by an Invalidity Committee, unlike those of OHIM. The interpretation by OHIM of Article 78 of the Staff Regulations would lead to a rupture of the single administration of the Communities, as enshrined in Article 9(3) of the Treaty of Amsterdam.

----
Case 4:22-cr-00164-O Document 19 Filed 06/15/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 29
Case 4:22-cr-00164-O Document 19 Filed 06/15/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 30
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ESCAPEX IP LLC, )

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-00963-X

v. )

)

SPOTIFY USA INC., )

Defendant. )

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

This Court, having considered Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for

Defendant to Respond to Complaint (the “Motion”), hereby GRANTS the Motion and ORDERS

the following: Defendant’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended

to July 23, 2022.

SIGNED this _____________ day of 2022.

_______________________________

HONORABLE JUDGE PRESIDING

Case 3:22-cv-00963-X Document 9-1 Filed 05/20/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 69
To:

From:

Date:

Subject:

File

Antonio M. Bouza

September 4, 2001

NEMA meeting August 28, 001

On August 28, 2001, NEMA had an informal meeting with DOE to

review DOE's draft test procedure for distribution

transformers. A total of nine NEMA individuals, members and

employees, were physically present or joined the

conversation by phone. The group representing DOE for the

hour and a half meeting included Carl Adams (DOE), Oskars

Petersons (NIST) and Antonio Bouza (DOE).

NEMA was told that DOE is planning on having a public

workshop on the test procedure, re-opening, early next year.

Which will allow all interested stakeholders an opportunity

to publicly comment on any issues related to DOE's test

procedure for Distribution Transformers.

NEMA made three major technical suggestions, which DOE is

exploring:

• Scope

® Ambient testing temperature

• DOE's sampling plan

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 34

To: File 

From: Antonio M. Bouza 

Date: September 4, 2001 

Subject: NEMA meeting August 28, 2001 

On August 28, 2001, NEMA had an informal meeting with DOE to 

review DOE's draft test procedure for distribution 

transformel'S. A total of nine NEMA individuals, members and 

employees, were physically present or joined the 

conversation by phone. The group representing DOE for the 

hour and a half meeting included Carl Adams (DOE), Oskars 

Petersons (NIST) and Antonio Bouza (DOE). 

NEMA was told tht"l.t DOE is planning on having a publ ic 

workshop on tIle test procedure, re-opening, early next year. 

Which will allow all interested stakeholders an opportunity 

to publicly comment on any issues related to DOE's test 

procedure for Distribution Transformers. 

NEMA made three major technical suggestions, which DOE is 

exploring: 

o Scope 

• Ambient testing temperature 

• DOE's sampl ing plan
#### WEATHERSBEE v. TRIPP et al.

No. 4089.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

May 1, 1941.

No appearance for appellant.

Jesse R. Orth, of Odessa, for appellees.

WALTHALL, Justice.

The transcript of record in this case was filed in this court on November 11, 1940, and was set for submission in this court for Thursday, April 24, 1941.

A final judgment was entered in this case in the District Court of Culberson County, Texas, October 23, 1940, from which judg*470ment appellant prosecuted this .appeal and gave bond. Appellant has not filed a brief in this court.

The appellees have filed a motion herein that the judgment of the trial court be in all things affirmed.

We have carefully searched the record and found no fundamental error.

The case is affirmed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STEVIE WILSON
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 884

[ July 13, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Samantha Schosberg Feuer , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502014

CF003833A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, Ian Seldin and Patrick Donahue, Assistant Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven

Ocksr ider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, C IKLIN and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 154 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 154

   To designate the week of June 7, 1993, through June 14, 1993, as 
                  ``National Flag Celebration Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 1993

  Mr. McCloskey introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   To designate the week of June 7, 1993, through June 14, 1993, as 
                  ``National Flag Celebration Week''.

Whereas it is the obligation of each generation of Americans to instruct the 
        next in the significance of our history and of the meaning of and the 
        ideals embodied in our Nation's patriotic symbols;
Whereas the flag of the United States is the principal patriotic symbol of our 
        Nation;
Whereas the citizens of the United States already celebrate the observance of 
        Flag Day on June 14 of each year: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week beginning June 
7, 1993, which culminates with the observance of Flag Day on June 14, 
1993, be declared National Flag Celebration Week, during which the 
Nation's school children would be encouraged to discuss and study our 
flag, and the ideals it represents.

                                 <all>
```
" " ' 

ctr.a~\ L,:~:~ ·ir":J cr COURT 

IN THE UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT 1•:0rm~:·,:;-; 8:ST OF iX 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUS::::c;( c,v;s1on 

LUBBOCK DIVISION 2023 JM,! -4 AM 10: 31 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

DEPUTY CLEim~ 

V. CASE NO. 5:22-CR-074-H-BQ-4 

CHRISTINA MONIQUE MARTINEZ 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA 

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

This case has been referred by the United States district judge to the undersigned 

for the taking of a guilty plea. The parties have consented to appear before a United States 

magistrate judge for these purposes. This Report and Recommendation on Plea is submitted 

to the court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). 

The defendant appeared with counsel before the undersigned United States 

magistrate judge, who addressed the defendant personally in open court and informed the 

defendant of, and determined that the defendant understood, the admonitions contained in 

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

The defendant pleaded guilty (under a written plea bargain agreement with the 

government) to Count Six of the Indictment, charging defendant with a violation of 

21 US.C. §§ 841 (a)(]) and 841 (b)(l)(C), that is, Possession with Intent to Distribute 

Fentanyl. After examining Defendant under oath the undersigned magistrate judge finds 

the following: 

1. Defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing 

to enter this guilty plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final 

approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge; 

Case 5:22-cr-00074-H-BQ Document 205 Filed 01/04/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 406
2. Defendant fully understands the nature of the charges (including each 

essential element of the offense(s) charged) and penalties; 

3. Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea 

agreement supplement; 

4. Defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes 

to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right 

to appear before a United States district judge; 

5. Defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily; 

6. Defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; 

7. There is a factual basis for this plea; and 

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of 

guilty. 

Although I have conducted these proceedings and recommend acceptance of 

Defendant's plea of guilty, the United States district judge has the power to review my 

actions and possesses final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if 

Defendant has any objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he 

is required to make those known to the United States district judge within fourteen (14) 

days of today. 

Based on the above, I recommend that Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted, that 

Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. 

Signed January 4, 2023. 

D. GORDON BRYANT, 

UNITED ST ATES MAGIST 

Case 5:22-cr-00074-H-BQ Document 205 Filed 01/04/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 407