alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28637]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-254-003]


Dauphin Island Gathering Partners; Notice of Refund Report

November 2, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 30, 2000, Dauphin Island Gathering 
Partners (DIGP) tendered for filing its refund report in Docket Nos. 
RP00-254-000 and RP00-254-001.
    DIGP states that this filing and the refunds were made to comply 
with the Commission's May 23, 2000 Letter Order. DIGP states that 
refunds were paid on August 30, 2000 and October 12, 2000.
    DIGP states that copies of this filing are being served 
contemporaneously on all participants listed on the service list in 
this proceeding and on all persons who are required by the Commission's 
regulations to be served with the application initiating these 
proceedings.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before November 9, 2000. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be 
viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-
208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28637 Filed 11-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
U.S. Department of the Treasury

Office of Public Affairs

Press Release: July 14, 2020

Contact: Treasury Public Affairs, (202) 622-2960 

Readout of Financial Stability Oversight Council Meeting

Washington – U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin today convened a meeting of the 

Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) in executive session by telephone. 

The Council discussed developments related to COVID-19 and its impacts on financial 

institutions and markets. In particular, Council members shared information about actions they 

are taking to monitor the financial system. 

In addition, the Council heard an update from staff regarding an activities-based review of 

secondary mortgage market activities. 

The Council also received an update regarding the Federal Reserve Board’s recently announced 

stress test results, including the additional COVID-focused analysis conducted by the Board. 

The Council also voted to approve the minutes of its previous meeting on May 14, 2020. 

Additional information regarding the Council, its work, and its meeting minutes is available at 

http://www.fsoc.gov.

####
<page> EXHIBIT 32.01





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund Limited Partnership (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-
Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I,
Walter Davis, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	 /s/ Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President

Date:		May 15, 2006
#### MILLER v. HAMPTON et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 5, 1953.

William Hays and J. Smith Hays, Winchester, for appellant.

Rodney Haggard and D. L. Pendleton, Sr., Winchester, for appellee.

MILLIKEN, Justice.

This action-was instituted by the appel-lees, Nathan and Lottie Mae Hampton, against the appellant, William C. Miller, to quiet title to a rectangular parcel of land, 129 feet 9 inches by 25 feet 93⁄8 inches, known as the north half of lot 36 in the Oliver Addition, Winchester,. Kentucky. The appellant made no claim to the western portion of the lot, but did claim title to that portion, 43 feet by 25 feet, 91⁄2 inches, lying in the eastern or alley side of the lot where he had erected a taxi stand. The chancellor adjudged that the Hamptons were the owners of the whole lot and Miller appeals.

The appellees traced their record title to the entire lot through an unbroken chain of mesne conveyances back to J. W. Poynter and wife, who conveyed the property to Hudson Langford by a deed dated June 1, 1894, recorded June 11, 1896. Hudson Langford devised the lot to his wife, Mary, in 1913. Mary conveyed the lot to Sam and Mattie Smith on February 11, 1930, and the Smiths conveyed the lot to the appel-lees on October 12, 1943.' The appellees’ record title stands complete back to the Poynter deed and all of the instruments of title purport to convey the whole north half of lot 36.

The appellant traced his record title to the eastern portion of the lot as follows: He received his deed from Lula Berry in 1946. Lula received her deed from her husband, Thomas Berry, in 1914. Thomas received his deed from Alice Wilson in 1913. But here the chain of title breaks and does not establish a common source. The appellant attempts to hook into the appellees’ chain of title at the Lang-ford link, but there is no deed from the Langfords to Alice Wilson nor was any evidence introduced as to the execution of such an instrument. The Wilson to Thomas Berry deed vainly attempts to bridge the gap between Wilson and Langford by a *898recitation that a deed had been made by-Langford to Ed and Alice Wilson in 1892, but that it had been lost or destroyed and never placed of record. It is a fundamental that the grantor and grantee to a deed cannot by their private agreement take the title out of someone who is not a party thereto nor make stipulations in it which would be binding upon strangers to the instrument. Furthermore, the evidence appears conclusive that the Langfords did not own the lot in 1892.

The appellant also relies upon adverse possession to establish his title, but the evidence discloses that the appellees and their predecessors in title 'have been living in a residence on the west portion of the lot for over a half century and that no one occupied the east portion of the lot for over thirty-two years before the appellant built his taxi stand in 1946. The evidence supports the chancellor’s findings.

The judgment is affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, James W. Bullock, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Endocardial
Solutions, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee
of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 7, 2004 /s/ James W. BullockSignatureName: James W. BullockTitle: Chief Executive Officer
# Official Journal L 62/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.062.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 62 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 552 March 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.062.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 62

English edition

Legislation

Volume 552 March 2012

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | 2012/101/EU, Euratom |
| | * | Definitive adoption of amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2011 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

BUDGETS

2012/101/EU, Euratom

*

Definitive adoption of amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2011

1

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Doyle P. VAN HORN, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 21843.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 14, 1942.

Otto Mullinax, of Winnsboro, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of cattle theft. Upon conviction, his punishment was fixed at two years in the state penitentiary.

Appellant has filed affidavit advising this court that he does not further desire to prosecute his appeal.

The appeal is dismissed at the request of appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JOHN DOE,

Plaintiff,

v.

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY, 

Defendant.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00297-O 

ORDER

Before the Court are Non-Party Jane Roe’s Motion for Leave to File Unredacted Exhibits 

Under Seal (ECF No. 164), filed December 5, 2022; and Defendant Texas Christian University’s 

Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Appendix Under Seal (ECF No. 166), filed December 5, 

2022. Both motions are unopposed. 

The parties and non-party to this suit have sought (and received approval) to seal 

numerous documents on the record in this dispute. And though sealing information in the 

judicial record is “heavily disfavor[ed]” given the understanding that “the public’s right of access 

to judicial records is a fundamental element of the rule of law[,]” that public right of access is 

not absolute. June Med. Servs. v. Phillips, 22 F.4th 512, 519–20 (5th Cir. 2022). As this Court 

has repeatedly noted on the record, the district court has supervisory power to seal documents if 

the interests favoring nondisclosure outweigh the presumption in favor of the public’s common 

law right of access, provided the court undertakes a serious balancing of the public-versusprivate interests at stake. Id; see also Test Masters Educ. Servs. Inc., 799 F.3d 437, 454 (5th Cir. 

2015) (citing Nixon, 435 U.S. at 598). Having undertaken this balancing of interests again here, 

the Court finds good cause to permit the requesting parties to file their documents under seal. 

Because the documents in question would reveal Plaintiff Doe’s, Non-Party Roe’s, and their 

Case 4:22-cv-00297-O Document 167 Filed 12/06/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 9781
2 

family members’ identities; because the sealed documents have been provided in narrowlyredacted form on the record; and given the sensitive nature of the underlying sexual assault 

allegations in this case, the Court GRANTS the motions and ORDERS the parties to file 

their redacted documents under seal in support of their respective briefs/motions. 

SO ORDERED this 6th day of December, 2022. 

Case 4:22-cv-00297-O Document 167 Filed 12/06/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 9782
Message from the Secretary of the Treasury

Dear Member:

Over the past four years, the Department of the Treasury has supported President Obama’s 

efforts to rebuild and grow the nation’s economy in the wake of the worst downturn since the 

Great Depression. Treasury has continued efforts to deliver core services efficiently at a lower 

cost to the taxpayer, while also striving to restore confidence in the financial system by working 

to bolster job creation and support recovery in the housing market. 

The President’s FY 2014 Budget requests $14.2 billion to fund the Department’s operating 

bureaus and $2.9 billion to fund our International Programs. This Budget includes substantial 

savings and program reductions of $382 million across the Department, as well as targeted 

investments in key areas that will help strengthen our nation’s long-term economic and fiscal 

position. 

Our request includes substantial investments in improved taxpayer service, enforcement, and in 

technology at IRS, which will drive efficiencies now and in the future. The tax enforcement and 

compliance increases which will yield over $32 billion in net savings to reduce the deficit over 

the next 10 years are proposed to be funded through a multi-year program integrity cap 

adjustment. 

Our Budget also includes funding for select priorities such as new Treasury responsibilities to 

support the economic and environmental restoration of the Gulf region after the Deepwater 

Horizon oil spill, an increased commitment to the Healthy Food Financing Initiative, investments 

in improving financial management, and investments in financial access and capability efforts. 

The request for Treasury’s International Program will support initiatives to strengthen our 

national security, support the next generation of export markets, and address key global 

challenges like environmental degradation and food security, while fostering private sector 

development and entrepreneurship. These funds also preserve U.S. leadership in international 

financial institutions.

The FY 2014 Congressional Budget Justification includes information required in the Annual 

Performance Report. We have validated the accuracy, completeness, and reliability of this

performance data.

Sincerely,

Jacob J. Lew

April 10, 2013
#### BRAZEAL v. STATE.

No. 22182.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 14, 1942.

Wm. E. Davenport, of San Angelo, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The conviction in this case was for violation of the liquor laws and a fine of $250 was assessed, from which appeal was taken.

The county attorney of Tom Green County has filed an affidavit setting forth the death of the appellant, G. E. Brazeal, on June- 5, 1942, upon which information the appeal is abated and the case ordered dismissed from the docket.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed January 24, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-1852

Lower Tribunal No. F06-43010

________________

Santiago Milian,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ramiro C. Areces, Judge.

Santiago Milian, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina Lauren Dominguez, 

Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67739-67740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28935]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-301-009]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

November 6, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 31, 2000, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing, as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the

[[Page 67740]]

following tariff sheets proposed to become effective November 1, 2000:

First Revised Sheet No. 14B
First Revised Sheet No. 14F
First Revised Sheet No. 14L

    ANR is filing the attached tariff sheets to reflect a change in the 
negotiated rate contracts with Wisconsin Public Service Corporation 
(WPSC). WPSC is increasing its MDQ under its Marshfield contract 5500 
by 68 dth/d, and making a corresponding decrease of 68 dth/d to its 
Joliet Hub contract 104403. Also, WPSC is adjusting its previous annual 
MDQ level associated with NNS contract 99515, to provide for a seasonal 
split it the MDQ. Therefore, on an annual basis, there is no change in 
level of NNS service. ANR requests that the Commission grant ANR any 
waivers of the Commission's regulations which are necessary in order to 
make these tariff sheets effective as of November 1, 2000, and to the 
extent necessary, moves pursuant to 18 CFR 154.7(a)(9) for the tariff 
sheets to go into effect on said date. Additionally, ANR requests all 
such further relief as is appropriate.
    ANR states that a copy of this filing is being mailed to the 
affected shipper and to each of ANR's FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1 and Original Volume No. 2 customers, and interested State 
Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28935 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 412 and 414. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application. 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2000-8213.                 

*Date Filed:*                     October 31, 2000.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*                     PTC123 0116 dated 27 October 2000 (r—1-6), PTC123 0117 dated 27 October 2000 (r—7-9), TC123 North Atlantic Expedited Resolutions, Intended effective dates: 1 December 2000/1 January 2001.                

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2000-8214.                 

*Date Filed:*                     October 31, 2000.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*                     PTC123 0118/0119/0120/0121 dated 27 October 2000, TC123 Mid/South Atlantic Resolutions, Intended effective dates: 1 December 2000/1 January 2001.                

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2000-8244.                 

*Date Filed:*                     November 3, 2000.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*                     PTC COMP 0718 dated 3 November 2000, Mail Vote 093—Resolution 010h, Special Passenger Currency Conversion Resolution—euro, Intended effective date: 1 January 2001.                 

Dorothy Y. Beard, 

Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 00-29237 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P