alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RODNEI FRAZIER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JOHNATHAN AKANO; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-17471

D.C. No. 1:10-cv-01656-LJO-MJS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 21, 2015** 

Before: CANBY, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Rodnei Frazier appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs and retaliation against him for filing a

federal action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. 

FILED

FEB 3 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A); Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order)

(dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Frazier’s Eighth Amendment claim

because Frazier failed to allege facts sufficient to show that defendants were

deliberately indifferent to his alleged need for treatment. See Farmer v. Brennan,

511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994) (“[A] prison official cannot be found liable under the

Eighth Amendment for denying an inmate humane conditions of confinement

unless the official knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health[.]”);

Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 746 (9th Cir. 2002) (delay of medical treatment

does not constitute deliberate indifference unless delay led to further injury); see

also Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341-42 (9th Cir. 2010) (though pro se

pleadings are to be liberally construed, a plaintiff must still present factual

allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief).

The district court properly dismissed Frazier’s retaliation claim because

Frazier failed to allege facts to show that defendants knew of or were motivated by

Frazier’s federal action filed against individuals at another prison facility years

earlier. See Rhodes v. Robinson, 408 F.3d 559, 567-68 (9th Cir. 2005) (elements

of a retaliation claim in the prison context).

2 13-17471
We reject Frazier’s contentions concerning leave to amend to add new

defendants.

AFFIRMED.

3 13-17471
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

CHANTOVIA JACKSON, § 

 § 

Plaintiff, § 

 § 

V. § No. 3:22-cv-1687-N-BN 

 § 

CHICK AND SEAFOOD INC., ET AL., § 

 § 

Defendants. § 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

United States Magistrate Judge David L. Horan made findings, conclusions, 

and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court 

reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. 

Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court therefore GRANTS the motions 

for default judgment [Dkt. Nos. 41, 48, & 51] against Defendants Chick and Seafood 

Inc., Grand HBL, LLC, Linda Henderson, and Amjad Elatrash. And this matter 

remains referred to Judge Horan for pretrial management, to determine the damages 

to be awarded, to allow the Court to enter a final judgment. 

SO ORDERED this 12th day of July, 2024. 

 

 ____________________________________________ 

 DAVID C. GODBEY 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cv-01687-N-BN Document 58 Filed 07/12/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 343
4:22-cr-154-O

Case 4:22-cr-00154-O Document 1 Filed 05/24/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 1
Case 4:22-cr-00154-O Document 1 Filed 05/24/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 2
Case 4:22-cr-00154-O Document 1 Filed 05/24/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 3
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 Certification Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  The
following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 of Hub Group, Inc. pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be deemed
filed pursuant to any provision of the Exchange Act of 1934 or any other
securities law.
  Each of
the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Hub Group, Inc.
  /s/David
      P. Yeager
                
                
                /s/Terri
      A. PizzutoName:
      David P. Yeager
                
                
                Name: Terri
      A. PizzutoTitle: Vice
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                
                
                Title:
      Executive Vice President, Chief FinancialHub
      Group, Inc.
                
                
                Officer
      and TreasurerHub
      Group, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 273 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 273

 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution relating to Federal budget 
                              procedures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 1993

   Mr. Volkmer introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution relating to Federal budget 
                              procedures.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within ten years after its submission to the States for ratification.

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Prior to each fiscal year, the Congress shall adopt a 
statement of receipts and outlays for that year in which total outlays 
are not greater than total receipts. The Congress may amend such 
statement provided revised outlays are no greater than revised 
receipts. Whenever three-fifths of the whole number of both Houses 
shall deem it necessary, Congress in such statement may provide for a 
specific excess of outlays over receipts by a vote directed solely to 
that subject. The Congress and the President shall, pursuant to 
legislation or through exercise of their powers under the first and 
second articles, ensure that actual outlays do not exceed the outlays 
set forth in such statement.
    ``Section 2. Total receipts for any fiscal year set forth in the 
statement adopted pursuant to this article shall not increase by a rate 
greater than the rate of increase in national income in the year or 
years ending not less than six months nor more than twelve months 
before such fiscal year, unless a majority of the whole number of both 
Houses of Congress shall have passed a bill directed solely to 
approving specific additional receipts and such bill has become law.
    ``Section 3. The Congress may waive the provisions of this article 
for any fiscal year in which a declaration of war is in effect.
    ``Section 4. Total receipts shall include all receipts of the 
United States except those derived from borrowing and total outlays 
shall include all outlays of the United States except those for 
repayment of debt principal.
    ``Section 5. This article shall take effect for the second fiscal 
year beginning after its ratification.
    ``Section 6. The Congress shall enforce and implement this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.

                                 <all>
```
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Credit Suisse First BostonMortgage Securities Corp. 

11 MADISON AVE

NEW YORK, New York 10010-3643

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.,Commercial  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C2

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Case 3:22-cr-00145-M Document 252 Filed 02/28/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 616
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1651
ROBERT LEE DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBESON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; ROBESON COUNTYBOARD OF EDUCATION, in its individual capacity; BETH WILLIAMSON, in her individual and official capacities; ABNER HARRINGTON, in his individual and official capacities; MIKESMITH, in his individual and official capacities; PAUL BROOKS, in his individual and official capacities; ROBERT DEESE, in his individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmin gton. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-42-7-F) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 20, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Davis, Appellant Pro Se.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint, under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(West Supp. 1997), and denying his motion to recuse. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Robeson County Pub. Schs. , No. CA-97-42-7-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 22, 1997). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -**  **2012 -**  **0772** Docket Number
**2007 -**  **SW -**  **053 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplem ental AD Docket Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin No. 53A008, dated July 19, 2006; Eurocopter Service Bulletin No. 53 - 006, Revision 1, dated September 30, 2004; Eurocopter Service Bulletin No. 53 - 007, Revision 1, dated February 19, 2007; and Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin No. 05A002, Revision 0, dated July 18, 2006.


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOUR S OF:**  9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Case 3:22-cr-00233-X Document 32 Filed 12/13/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 59
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 234 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 234

   Designating the week of October 3 through 9, 1993, as ``National 
                        Customer Service Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 1993

   Mr. Glickman introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Designating the week of October 3 through 9, 1993, as ``National 
                        Customer Service Week''.

Whereas recognition of the value and importance of the customer raises the 
        quality of customer service;
Whereas the high cost of attracting new customers today heightens the need for 
        companies to keep existing customers through effective customer service;
Whereas recognition of the contributions made by customer service to the 
        profitability of a company increases the professional status of customer 
        service;
Whereas excellent customer service distinguishes successful companies that 
        understand the important influence a customer has on the success of a 
        company; and
Whereas excellent customer service can contribute to the growth and success of 
        every company: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week of October 3 
through 9, 1993, is designated as ``National Customer Service Week''. 
The President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation 
calling on the people of the United States to observe the week with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>       5

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        Jun-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                           Jul-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                    11,417,000
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              1,300,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          13,739,000
<PP&E>                                     5,790,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,829,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            34,322,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      4,710,000
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                     139,000
<OTHER-SE>                                29,473,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              34,322,000
<SALES>                                    3,206,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           3,206,000
<CGS>                                      2,406,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             21,538,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (254,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (18,078,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (18,078,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           32,502,000
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                              14,424,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .11







</TABLE>
APPLICANT ROBERT LEE WALLACE APPLICATION NO. 77,904-02 

### APPLICATION FOR 11.07 WRIT OFHABEAS CORPUS ACTION TAKEN
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeneLink, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Bernard L. Kasten, Jr. M.D., as Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:





(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 12, 2011
By:
s/ Bernard L. Kasten, Jr., M.D.Bernard L. Kasten, Jr., M.D., Chief

Executive Officer and Principal Financial

Officer
Case 4:22-cr-00136-P Document 17 Filed 05/18/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 28
Case 4:22-cr-00136-P Document 17 Filed 05/18/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 29
**EXHIBIT 21**

SUBSIDIARIES OF STANADYNE HOLDINGS, INC. 

Stanadyne Automotive Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation 

Stanadyne Corporation, aDelaware corporation 

Precision Engine Products Corp., a Delaware corporation 

Precision Engine Products LTDA, a commercial limited liability company incorporated in Brazil 

Stanadyne, SpA, a S.p.A. company incorporated in Italy 

Stanadyne Amalgamations Private Limited a private limited company incorporated in India (fully consolidated based on the company’s 51% controlling share, while the remaining 49% is recorded as a minorityinterest) 

SUBSIDIARIES OF STANADYNE CORPORATION 

Precision Engine Products Corp., a Delaware corporation 

Precision Engine Products LTDA, a commercial limited liability company incorporated in Brazil 

Stanadyne, SpA, a S.p.A. company incorporated in Italy 

Stanadyne Amalgamations Private Limited a private limited company incorporated in India (fully consolidated based on the company’s 51% controlling share, while the remaining 49% is recorded as a minorityinterest)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

DAVID SAMBRANO, et al., §

§

Plaintiffs, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 4:21-cv-01074-P

§

UNITED AIRLINES, INC., §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER

The parties are notified that the Fourth Floor Courtroom is equipped with limited

technology. Therefore, the parties are responsible for testing and setting up any technology 

they may wish to utilize at the October 8, 2021 hearing. Any questions regarding electronic 

equipment that cannot be answered through other means should be directed to Brian 

Rebecek at (817) 850-6613. To minimize the chance of technical disruptions, the Court 

encourages the parties to cooperate and share technological resources that will be utilized 

at the hearing. Further, the parties are directed to provide a list of technological devices 

that will be used to present evidence at the October 8, 2021 hearing. This list should be 

included along with the exhibit and witness list that the parties exchange and file by 

October 6, 2021. Order, ECF No. 32. Finally, as noted at the September 24, 2021 hearing, 

no witnesses are permitted to testify virtually/remotely at the October 8, 2021 hearing. 

SO ORDERED on this 30th day of September, 2021.

Mark T. Pittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:21-cv-01074-P Document 35 Filed 09/30/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID 348
AIRPORT 

^tiown County 

2077 AIRPORT DRIVE, STE. 18 

GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN 54313-5596 

A t ae+St^ C#'«ra« «A^s/j 

International Airport 

'QimmnBay 

THOMAS W. MILLER 

PHONE (920) 498-4800 FAX (920) 498-8799 

Web page: www.co.brown.wi.us/airDort 

AIRPORT DIRECTOR 

March 10, 2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-Wk 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity to express my support for the application for antitrust 

immunity and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan 

Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for oneworld to 

compete effectively with the Star and SkyTeam alliance. This increased interalliance 

competition will in turn enhance the benefits of the Department's Open Skies policy -

first by solidifying U.S.-Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a foundation for further 

liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, I encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this 

application as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together to 

deliver highly competitive air transportation services. Approval for AA/JAL alliance will 

have a positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and 

pricing options and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefit from having 

three competitive air alliances to choose from. 

I urge you to quickly approve this application. 

Sincerely, 

if. iivXJThomas W. Miller 

Airport Director 

miller tw@co.brown.wi.us 

A service provided by Brown County Government 

100% Recycled Paper
U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

Press Release: December 14, 2017

Contact: Public Affairs (202) 622-2960 

Readout of Financial Stability Oversight Council Meeting

WASHINGTON – U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin today convened a meeting of the 

Financial Stability Oversight Council (Council) in executive and open sessions at the U.S. 

Department of the Treasury. 

During the executive session, the Council discussed the recent report from Secretary Mnuchin to 

the President on the Council’s processes for designating nonbank financial companies and 

financial market utilities. 

The Council also discussed the pending litigation brought by MetLife challenging its designation 

by the Council in December 2014.

In addition, the Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) provided an 

overview of the recently introduced futures contracts on Bitcoin and his policy view and risk 

assessment of those instruments. The Council discussed issues concerning cryptocurrencies, 

including risks, price volatility, investor protection, and potential for illicit use. The Council 

agreed to continue to review these issues at subsequent meetings.

In the open session, the Council voted to approve its 2017 annual report. The Council also heard 

a presentation from the CFTC on its Project KISS to simplify and modernize its rules.

 

The Council also voted to approve the minutes of its previous meeting on November 16.

An archived webcast of the open session can be found here.

Additional information regarding the Council, its work, and the recently approved annual report 

and meeting minutes is available at http://www.fsoc.gov.

###