alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      20,112,000
<SECURITIES>                                26,626,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,209,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,022,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,667,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            74,473,000
<PP&E>                                      11,868,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,783,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              80,522,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,838,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  74,674,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                80,522,000
<SALES>                                     11,648,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,398,000
<CGS>                                        5,907,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,546,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               531,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,414,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   122,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,536,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,536,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2,194
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                       2,592
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  7,013
<PP&E>                                           69,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                   22,685
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   56,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            11,936
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             42
<OTHER-SE>                                       38,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     56,062
<SALES>                                          42,736
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 42,736
<CGS>                                            11,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    39,717
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     23
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2,311
<INCOME-TAX>                                        919
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1,392
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1,392
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.32
        

</TABLE>
US. DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN Dis ITO TEXAS
FILED :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION SEP 3.0 2009

Sie
CLERK. Us DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § By.
Plaintiff, :
v. : 2:22-CR-80-Z-BR-(1)
CHRISTOPHER MARRUGO ;
Defendant. :

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

On September 14, 2022, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and
Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty (“Report and Recommendation”) in the above
referenced cause. Defendant Christopher Marrugo filed no objections to the Report and
Recommendation within the fourteen-day period set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court
independently examined all relevant matters of record in the above referenced cause—including the
elements of the offense, Factual Resume, Plea Agreement, and Plea Agreement Supplement—and
thereby determined that the Report and Recommendation is correct. Therefore, the Report and
Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED by the United States District Court. Accordingly, the Court
hereby FINDS that the guilty plea of Defendant Christopher Marrugo was knowingly and voluntarily
entered; ACCEPTS the guilty plea of Defendant Christopher Marrugo; and ADJUDGES Defendant
Christopher Marrugo guilty of Count One in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2).

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's sentencing scheduling order.

SO ORDERED, September 2 2022. 9h i —

MAJTHEW J. KACSMARYK
ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
### APPENDIX D

- 2

2011 O n road Source Ozone Season Inventory

Provided in Electronic Form Only

Bureau of Air Quality

Department of Environmental Protection[ This page intentionally left blank

. ]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DIBY AKO PLAINTIFF

vs. No. 3:22-cv-1751-S

ARRIVA BEST SECURITY, INC.,

and AMOIFO KOFFI DEFENDANTS

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLERK’S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

AGAINST DEFENDANT ARRIVA BEST SECURITY, INC.

The Court having reviewed the Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default against 

Defendant Arriva Best Security, Inc., and the grounds therefore, finds the Motion is well 

taken and grants the Motion.

It is ORDERED that the Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default against Defendant

Arriva Best Security, Inc. is GRANTED.

Any default judgment will be entered by the Court.

SO ORDERED this ___ day of August, 2023.

Hon. Karen Gren Scholer

United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-01751-S Document 25-2 Filed 08/29/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 92
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code),  the  undersigned  officer of
Digital  Lifestyles Group, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect
to the  Quarterly  Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2005 (the "Report") that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   August 10, 2006            By:     /s/ Andy Teng
                                            -----------------------------
                                    Name:   Andy Teng
                                    Title:  Chief Executive Officer,
                                            Chief Financial Officer and
                                            Chairman of the Board


     The foregoing  certification  is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the  United  States  Code) and is not being  filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
P.O. Box 700548, Dallas, Texas 75370-0548 

(972) 725-9000  FAX (972) 725-9090 

June 14, 2011 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Management System 

Docket Number FAA-2003-15806 

400 7th Street, SW., Room PL-400 

Room PL 401 

Washington, DC 20591-0001. 

Submitted via FAA Docket 2003-15806 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

On behalf of Ameristar Air Cargo, Inc., I respectfully request that Exemption No. 8127C be 

extended beyond its current expiration date of June 30, 2011. 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) granted exemption No. 8127 to Ameristar Air Cargo, 

Inc. (Ameristar) on September 4, 2003. This exemption is from 14 CFR §§ 91.203(a) and (b) 

and 121.153(a)(1) and allows Ameristar to operate its U.S.-registered aircraft in domestic 

operations temporarily following the incidental loss or mutilation of that aircraft’s airworthiness 

certificate or registration certificate, or both. 

Granting an extension of Exemption No. 8127 would be in the public interest by continuing to 

provide an uninterrupted and immediate service to the public in the event that an aircraft 

registration or airworthiness certificate was lost or mutilated. 

Thank you for your consideration in this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Pat Hulsey 

Director of Operations
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

SAYBREE FILLYAW, ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) No. 3:22-CV-1112-N (BH) 

 ) 

COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK & ) 

 TRUST, et al., ) 

 Defendants. ) Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections 

thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the 

opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are 

accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. By separate judgment, the plaintiff’s 

claims will be DISMISSED. 

SIGNED this 13th day of October, 2023. 

 ____________________________________________ 

 DAVID C. GODBEY 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-01112-N-BH Document 41 Filed 10/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 568
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

BIANCA SESSOMS, §

PLAINTIFF, §

§

V. § CIVIL CASE NO. 3:22-CV-1666-M-BK

§

FINGERHUT, ET AL., §

DEFENDANTS. §

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Special Order 3, this pro se case was referred to the 

United States magistrate judge for case management, including the issuance of findings and a 

recommended disposition. For the reasons that follow, this action should be DISMISSED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with a court order and want of prosecution.

On August 3, 2022, the Court issued an order admonishing Plaintiff of her responsibility 

to seek issuance of summons and serve process under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure within 90 days of filing, and warning her that failure to do so could result in dismissal 

of the case. Doc. 4. On October 18, 2022, because Plaintiff had not sought issuance of 

summons, the Court issued a second order notifying Plaintiff that her case would be dismissed 

under Rule 4(m) unless she completed service of process on Defendants or demonstrated good 

cause for failure to do so no later than November 2, 2022. Doc. 6. As of this date, however, 

Plaintiff has done neither.

Case 3:22-cv-01666-M-BK Document 7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 22
2

Accordingly, this action should be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure 

to properly serve Defendants. See FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m).

SO RECOMMENDED on November 9, 2022.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE AND

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL/OBJECT

A copy of this report and recommendation will be served on all parties in the manner provided by 

law. Any party who objects to any part of this report and recommendation must file specific 

written objections within 14 days after being served with a copy. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED.

R. CIV. P. 72(b). An objection must identify the finding or recommendation to which objection is 

made, the basis for the objection, and the place in the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation the disputed determination is found. An objection that merely incorporates by 

reference or refers to the briefing before the magistrate judge is not specific. Failure to file specific 

written objections will bar the aggrieved party from appealing the factual findings and legal 

conclusions of the magistrate judge that are accepted or adopted by the district court, except upon 

grounds of plain error. See Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 

(5th Cir. 1996), modified by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time 

to file objections to 14 days). 

Case 3:22-cv-01666-M-BK Document 7 Filed 11/09/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 23
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                            <C>               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998       JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998       SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         43,460,000        43,460,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  50,486,000        50,486,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0                 0
<INVENTORY>                                    0                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,762,000       111,762,000
<PP&E>                                         4,060,947,000     4,060,947,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 165,508,000       165,508,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,100,397,000     4,100,397,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,267,000       107,267,000
<BONDS>                                        1,778,013,000     1,778,013,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                 0
<PREFERRED>                                    384,997,000       384,997,000
<COMMON>                                       0                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,830,120,000     1,830,120,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,100,397,000     4,100,397,000
<SALES>                                        138,196,000       351,606,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,773,000       359,557,000
<CGS>                                          42,938,000        108,493,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  67,297,000        63,639,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,904,000         14,074,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             28,024,000        63,639,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                40,548,000        111,611,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            40,548,000        111,611,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                324,000           370,000
<CHANGES>                                      0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                   32,079,000        89,295,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.48              1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.47              1.41
        

</TABLE>
December 3, 2015 

Dear Mr. Camp: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA-2015-3501). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to process your petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 12/17/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Program Analyst
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 265 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 265

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 14 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    To designate October 19, 1993, as ``National Mammography Day''.

Whereas, according to the American Cancer Society, one hundred eighty-two 
        thousand women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in 1993, and forty-
        six thousand women will die from this disease;
Whereas, in the decade of the 1990's, it is estimated that about two million 
        women will be diagnosed with breast cancer, resulting in nearly five 
        hundred thousand deaths;
Whereas the risk of breast cancer increases with age, with a woman at age 
        seventy having twice as much of a chance of developing the disease than 
        a woman at age fifty;
Whereas 80 percent of women who get breast cancer have no family history of the 
        disease;
Whereas mammograms, when operated professionally at an accredited facility, can 
        provide a safe and quick diagnosis;
Whereas experts agree that mammography is the best method of early detection of 
        breast cancer, and early detection is the key to saving lives; and
Whereas mammograms can reveal the presence of small cancers up to two years 
        before regular clinical breast examinations or breast self-examinations 
        (BSE), saving as many as a third more lives: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That October 19, 1993, be 
designated as ``National Mammography Day'', and the President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the 
people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate 
programs and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 13, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) I, Paul J. Mooney, Chief Financial Officer of Wheeling-Pittsburgh Corporation
(the registrant), certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Wheeling-Pittsburgh Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal controls over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors:  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal controls over financial reporting. Dated: May 11, 2004
    /s/ Paul J. MooneyPaul J. MooneyChief Financial Officer 31