alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2015, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Trust Advisor, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C22 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 of the Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from April 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far

  |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
Case 2:22-cv-00094-Z Document 60 Filed 05/31/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 696
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 266

Expressing the sense of the Congress concerning the need to preserve the

traditional lifeways in certain Alaska Native villages.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 14, 1994

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress concerning the need

to preserve the traditional lifeways in certain Alaska

Native villages.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in recognition of the prohibitive finan3 cial burden placed upon Alaska Native subsistence whaling

4 captains by international obligations ratified by the United

5 States, it is the sense of the Congress that the utmost

6 consideration should be given to clarify Federal tax law

7 to allow a reasonable Federal charitable tax deduction for

8 the reasonable and necessary expenses of such captains

9 related to their conduct of the centuries old subsistence

10 whaling hunt as a charitable contribution activity for the
2

•HCON 266 IH

1 benefit of their native community, donations to which are

2 deductible under section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code

3 of 1986.

Æ
#### SCOTT v. McLANE et al.

No. 3863.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

May 20, 1941.

Rehearing Denied June 18, 1941.

C. R. Grobe, of Columbus, and Harry D. Larson, of Eagle Lake, for appellant.

Miller & Rutta, of Columbus, Emanuel Roos, of Eagle Lake, Dorman Nickels, of Wharton, and Jos. V. Frnka, of Columbus, for appellees.

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This was an action in trespass to try title in the district court of Colorado county by appellant, Howard Scott, against appellees, J. R. McLane, Earl Carter, and Lee Estella Brownson, a feme sole, to recover the title and possession of certain land described in his first amended original petition. Appellees answered by pleas of not guilty and the several statutes of limitation, and by way of cross-action in trespass to try title and by the several statutes of limitations to recover the title and possession of the land described in appellant’s petition as against him and many other persons made defendants in the cross-action. On trial to the court without a jury, judgment was for ap-pellees against appellant and all other parties for the title and possession of the land in controversy. Only appellant, Howard Scott, prosecuted an appeal from the judgment of the lower court. The appeal was to the Galveston Court of Civil Appeals; the case is on our docket by order of transfer by the Supreme Court.

On motion of appellant, the trial court filed conclusions of fact and law.

 The judgment of the lower court has full support in the fact conclusion that appellees had title to all the land in controversy under the statute of limitation of ten years, Art. 5510, R.C.S.1925. On our review of the evidence on this issue, we conclude that it satisfactorily supports the court’s conclusion. We do not bring the evidence forward in our opinion because appellant’s propositions against this conclusion are mere abstract statements of the law and present nothing for review. We give his propositions:

> “Twelfth Proposition.

> “The relation of landlord and tenant once established, the tenant attorning to another, will not break the tenancy, and limitation cannot begin between them until the tenancy is repudiated and the repudiation brought home to the landlord”;

> “Thirteenth Proposition.

> “To subscribe under the Three, Five or Ten Years Statutes, it is necessary to prove adverse possession, before the claimant can prevail.”

Having concluded that the judgment of the lower court has full support on the court’s conclusion on the issue of ten years’ limitation, we pretermit a discussion of ap*342pellant’s assignments against the court’s conclusion -that appellees held title to the land in controversy under a regular chain of title from and under the original grantee. However, that appellant may have the benefit of our ruling on this issue, it is our conclusion that appellees hold the land under a regular chain of title, as found by the lower court.

It follows that the judgment of the lower court should be in all things affirmed, and it is accordingly so ordered.

Affirmed.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-2180

_____________________________

IVEY CROSBY a/k/a Rudolph 

Rock,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

September 25, 2020

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s “motion for emergency release,” docketed July 27, 

2020, is treated as a petition for writ of habeas corpus and is denied 

on the merits.

ROBERTS, OSTERHAUS, and JAY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Ivey Crosby, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
**Exhibit 99.1**

** **

**Certification**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)**

 

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of *SOURCECORP*, Incorporated, a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJune 30, 2002 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

 

 

 
| Dated: August 13, 2002 | /s/ Ed H. Bowman, Jr.                 |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                   | Ed H. Bowman, Jr.                     |
|                   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

 
| Dated: August 13, 2002 | /s/ Barry Edwards            |
|------------------------|------------------------------|
|                   | Barry Edwards                |
|                   | Executive Vice President and |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer      |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode).

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3592 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3592

 To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require a jobs score 
             for each spending bill considered in Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2013

 Mr. Cicilline (for himself, Mr. Lance, Mr. McDermott, and Mr. Ribble) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to 
      be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require a jobs score 
             for each spending bill considered in Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Jobs Score Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET ACT OF 1974.

    Section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 653) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'';
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
            ``(4) an estimate of the number of jobs which would be 
        created, sustained, or lost in carrying out such bill or 
        resolution in the fiscal year in which it is to become 
        effective and in each of the 4 fiscal years following such 
        fiscal year, together with the basis for each such estimate, 
        and to the extent practicable, the analysis shall include 
        regional and State-level estimates of jobs that would be 
        created, sustained, or lost.''.
                                 <all>
```
Impact on NA Re gional Emissions 

### • Av oided emissions due t o t ot al c arbon life cy cle – In use lifetime sa vings – to ta l pr oduct fo otprin t Insulation lifetime building = 50 y ear s 6 NA Insulation Plants = 20 year s of pr oduction Thr ee applications of equal volume DOW
III

Calendar No. 466

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 222

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 19 (legislative day, APRIL 11), 1994

Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

JUNE 15 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Reported by Mr. FORD, without amendment

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the placement of a bust of Raoul Wallenberg

in the Capitol.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Joint Committee on the Library is

3 authorized to accept a bust of Raoul Wallenberg and to

4 place the bust in an appropriate location in the Capitol,

5 as determined by the Joint Committee on the Library.

Passed the House of Representatives April 18, 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
Calendar No. 466

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 222

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the placement of a bust of Raoul

Wallenberg in the Capitol.

JUNE 15 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Reported without amendment
#### SIMPSON v. STATE.

No. 21978.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 4, 1942.

J. W. McCullough, of McKinney, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Upon appellant’s plea of guilty of the offense of theft of chickens, and the waiver of a trial by jury, the court assessed his penalty at confinement in the county jail for a period of five days.

The indictment properly charges the offense. The record contains neither .statement of facts nor bills of exceptions. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Case 5:22-cr-00046-H-BQ Document 66 Filed 09/07/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 140
Case 5:22-cr-00046-H-BQ Document 66 Filed 09/07/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 141
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Eye Institute.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Eye Institute, including consideration of personnel qualifications and 
performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, National Eye 
Institute.
    Date: December 4-5.
    Open: December 4, 2000, 9 am to 10 am.
    Agenda: Opening remarks by the Director, Intramural Research 
Program, on matters concerning the intramural program of the NEI.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, 
Building 10, Room 10B16, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Closed: December 4, 2000, 10 am to 5 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, 
Building 10, Room 10B16, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Closed: December 5, 2000, 9 am to 5 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, 
Building 10, Room 10B16, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Robert B. Nussenblatt, MD, Director, Intramural 
Research Program, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of 
Health, PHS, DHHS, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-3123.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 3, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-29143 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

VS, § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-156-K (01) 

 § 

JESUS ALEXANDER PEREZ FUENTES § 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

JESUS ALEXANDER PEREZ FUENTES, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 

125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a 

plea of guilty to Count 1 of the 2-Count Indictment, filed on April 19, 2022. After cautioning and 

examining Defendant Jesus Alexander Perez Fuentes, under oath concerning each of the subjects 

mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the 

offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of 

such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that Defendant Jesus 

Alexander Perez Fuentes, be adjudged guilty of Possession With Intent to Distribute a Controlled 

Substance, in violation of 21 USC § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C), and have sentence imposed accordingly. 

After being found guilty of the offense by the district judge. 

□ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. 

□ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear 

and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released. 

□ The Government does not oppose release. 

□ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release. 

□ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to 

any other person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or 

(c).

□ The Government opposes release.

□ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release. 

□ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

□ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there 

is a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly 

shown under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released. 

 Signed October 11, 2022. ____________________________________ 

 REBECCA RUTHERFORD

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date 

of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United 

States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B).

Case 3:22-cr-00156-K Document 32 Filed 10/11/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 70
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

by theChief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LION, Inc., a Washington corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of David Stedman, Interim Chief Executive Officer, and Steve Thomson, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350), that to his knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   



|                                |  |                        
|------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|INTERIM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                                |  |                        
|/s/ David Stedman               |  | /s/ Steve Thomson      
|David Stedman                   |  | Steve Thomson          
|November 14, 2007               |  | November 14, 2007      



---
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

** **

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Endocardial Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Robert Paulson,Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ J. Robert Paulson,  Jr. |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | J. Robert Paulson, Jr.      |
|   | Chief Financial Officer     |
|   | November 14, 2003           |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

Tony Jones

Plaintiffs,

 V.

City of Fort Worth, et al.

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO.

________________________

________________________________________________________________________

INDEX OF ALL DOCUMENTS FILED IN STATE COURT

________________________________________________________________________

PLEADING NAME DATE FILED

1. Plaintiff’s Original Petition April 19, 2022

2. Citation Issued- City of Fort Worth April 19, 2022

3. Citation Issued- Eulises Gonzalez April 19, 2022

4. Citation Issued- Gilberto Gonzalez April 19, 2022

5. City of Fort Worth’s Original Answer April 21, 2022

 Respectfully submitted,

s/ Lynn M. Winter

Lynn M. Winter

Senior Assistant City Attorney

State Bar No. 24078135

lynn.winter@fortworthtexas.gov

Harvey L. Frye Jr.

Senior Assistant City Attorney

State Bar No. 07496500

harvey.frye@fortworthtexas.gov

CITY OF FORT WORTH

Office of the City Attorney

200 Texas Street

Fort Worth, Texas 76102

Case 4:22-cv-00359-O Document 1-4 Filed 04/27/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 10
INDEX OF ALL DOCUMENTS FILED IN STATE COURT Page 2 of 2

P: 817.392.7600

F: 817.392.8359 

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 4:22-cv-00359-O Document 1-4 Filed 04/27/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 11