alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-04-1997
<CASH>                                          13,396
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,666
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,409)
<INVENTORY>                                     28,131
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,257
<PP&E>                                          35,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,420)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,688
<BONDS>                                         42,354
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           107
<OTHER-SE>                                          96
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,256
<SALES>                                         73,413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,413
<CGS>                                           70,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,280)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,280)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,280)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.116)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RITCHY BIENAIME,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-3643

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed February 9, 2018

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit 

Court for Orange County,

A. James Craner, Judge.

Ritchy Bienaime, Orlando, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Rebecca R. McGuigan, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. We affirm the postconviction court’s dismissal of Appellant’s rule 

3.850 motion. We do so without prejudice for Appellant to file a motion for postconviction 

relief, if appropriate, upon issuance of the mandate in his previously filed direct appeal,

case number 5D17-3164. 

EVANDER, LAMBERT, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|New Mexico Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|New Mexico Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 3,400  | 2,900  | 2,900  | 2,900  | 3,200  | 3,200  | 3,200  | 3,200 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3,900  | 5,000  | 11,000 | 11,200 | 11,200 | 11,200 | NA     | 11,200 | NA     | 11,200
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 11,200 | 9,200  | 8,600  | 8,600  | 10,200 | 10,400 | 10,400 | 10,900 | 10,900 | 10,900
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 10,900 | 10,900 | 10,900 | 10,900 | 10,900 | 10,900 | 10,900 | 10,900 | 10,900 | 11,100
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 11,800 | 9,500  | 9,500  | 9,500  | 9,500  |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
GANNETT CO., INC.
           1978 EXECUTIVE LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
                         AMENDMENT NO. 10

This amendment to the Gannett Co., Inc. 1978 Executive Long-Term
Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is adopted pursuant to resolutions of
the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of
the Company on July 24, 2000 and is effective on that date.

        Section 2.4 of the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

        2.4     Term and Exercise of Options

                Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, each Option
                granted under the Plan shall become exercisable with respect
                to 25% of the shares subject thereto on the first anniversary
                of the date of grant thereof, and with respect to an additional
                25% of such shares on each of the second, third and fourth
                anniversaries of such date of grant.  Options may be partially
                exercised from time to time within such percentage limitations.
                Options granted under the Plan shall be exercisable during such
                period or periods as the Committee shall determine; provided,
                however, that no Option shall be exercisable more than 10 years
                after the date of grant thereof.

                Effective with respect to Stock Option grants made on or after
                July 25, 2000, notwithstanding anything in this Section 2.4 to
                the contrary, upon a participant's termination of employment
                with Gannett following the participant's (a) death,
                (b) retirement at or after age 65, (c) early retirement at or
                after age 55 but before age 65 or (d) permanent disability, as
                determined under the Gannett Long Term Disability Plan, those
                Stock Options awarded to such participant and scheduled to vest
                on the next anniversary of the date of each applicable grant
                will be deemed to vest on a pro-rated basis on the date of
                termination of the participants employment with the Company,
                reflecting the number of full calendar months such participant
                worked during the year prior to the anniversary of the date of
                the grant. (For example, if the participant worked 4 of the 12
                months preceding the anniversary date of the grant date, then
                one-third (or 4/12) of the Options scheduled to vest on the
                next anniversary date would vest).

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Gannett Co., Inc. has caused this Amendment to be
executed by its duly authorized officer as of July 24, 2000.

                                                GANNETT CO., INC.

                                                By:  /s/ Richard L. Clapp
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     Richard L. Clapp
                                                     Senior Vice President/
                                                     Human Resources
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.
CHELSEA SHANNON M c INTYRE,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 22

- 50019
D.C. No. 2:19

- cr - 00236

- RGK

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 14, 2023 * *
Before: SILVERMAN, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges. Chelsea Shannon McIntyre appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 210

- month sentence imposed following her guilty

- plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine , in violation of 21
U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) , (b)(1)(A)(vii i ). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 21 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 50019

and we affirm. McIntyre contends that her sentence is substantively unreasonable. Although she does not dispute that she qualifies as a career offender, she argues
that the district court should not have considered the resulting guideline range
because the career offender guideline is not bas ed on sound policy and her predicate offenses were relatively minor and remote in time. McIntyre further contends that her mitigating circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors
warranted a 138

- month sentence. The district court did not abuse its d iscretion.
See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007)

. T he below

- Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the § 3553(a) factors and the totality of the circumstances, including McIntyre’s criminal history and decision to abscond prior to sentencing

. See Gall , 552 U.S. at 51 ; see also United States v. Gutierrez

Sanchez , 587 F.3d 904, 908 (9th Cir. 2009) (“The weight to be given the various factors in a particular case is for the discretion of the district cour t.”). Moreover, the district court adequately considered her mitigating circumstances and the § 3553(a) factors in arriving at this sentence.
AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                                   PSINET INC.

CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE AND WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES 
                              USED IN CALCULATION

                                 (UNAUDITED)(1)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                             MARCH 31, 1999
                                                           ------------------ 
<S>                                                             <C>       

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Common stock:
  Shares outstanding at beginning of period ............        52,083,639
  Weighted average shares issued during the three months
   ended March 31, 1999 (4,238,327 shares) .............         1,274,755
                                                              ------------ 
                                                                53,358,394
                                                              ------------ 
                                                              ------------ 
Net loss available to common shareholders ..............      $(59,261,000)
                                                              ------------ 
                                                              ------------ 
Basic and diluted loss per share .......................      $      (1.11)
                                                              ------------ 
                                                              ------------ 

</TABLE>

-------------

(1)  For a description of basic and diluted loss per share, see Note 1 of the
     Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's Annual
     Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 as filed with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                      -33-
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 35

Recognizing Belleville, New Jersey, as the birthplace of the industrial

revolution in the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1993

Mr. KLEIN submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing Belleville, New Jersey, as the birthplace of the

industrial revolution in the United States.

Whereas, in 1753, Josiah Hornblower, an English engineer

who was an associate and rival of James Watt, assembled

the 1st functioning steam engine in the Western Hemisphere in Belleville, New Jersey, to pump water from the

Schuyler copper mines;

Whereas, approximately 40 years after such assembly, the 1st

steam engine made in the United States was manufactured in a foundry in Belleville from designs by Josiah

Hornblower;

Whereas the designs were commissioned by Nicholas Roosevelt, who was the great-uncle of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Theodore Roosevelt, to power the Polacca,
2

•HCON 35 IH

which was the 1st experimental steamboat in the United

States;

Whereas the Polacca negotiated the Passaic River on October

21, 1798, which was several years before Robert Fulton’s

boat, Clermont, sailed the Hudson River;

Whereas historians herald the invention of the steam engine

as the beginning of the industrial revolution;

Whereas the presence of Josiah Hornblower in Belleville

brought many of the initiators of the industrial revolution

in the United States to Belleville;

Whereas such individuals included members of the Rutgers

family, many of whom are buried in the cemetery of the

old Dutch Reformed Church in Belleville; and

Whereas Belleville has a rightful claim to the title ‘‘Birthplace of the American Industrial Revolution’’: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) the Congress recognizes Belleville, New Jer4 sey, as the birthplace of the industrial revolution in

5 the United States; and

6 (2) the President is authorized and requested to

7 issue a proclamation honoring Belleville as such

8 birthplace.

Æ
Case 3:22-cv-01015-S-BN Document 9 Filed 08/30/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 71
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7135

MICHAEL WAYNE MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba

Zulu X,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN DOE; LAURIE BESSINGER; VAUGHN JACKSON,

Captain,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-1199-CV-6-3AK)

Submitted: January 23, 1996 Decided: February 13, 1996

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Wayne Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Andrew Frederick Lindemann, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON &

SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

pretrial motions. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and

certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292

(1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
([KLELW%

Case 4:22-cv-00430-Y Document 1-2 Filed 05/17/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 52
([KLELW%

Case 4:22-cv-00430-Y Document 1-2 Filed 05/17/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 53
{"agency":"Treasury","generated":"2022-01-10 15:09:47","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"},{"label":"2020","value":"2020"}],"value":"2022"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["BEP","DO","FinCEN","Fiscal Service","IRS","MINT","OCC","TIGTA","TTB"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["11","162","46","56","2003","32","364","58","19"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["4","127","45","59","1670","5","374","57","11"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["31","1337","29","6","1074","52","40","3","4"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2022","quarter":"Q1"}
H. Con. Res. 291 Agreed to September 23, 1994

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (S. 1587) to revise and

streamline the acquisition laws of the Federal Government, and

for other purposes, the Secretary of the Senate shall make the

following corrections:

(1) In paragraph (2)(A) of the matter proposed to be added

at the end of section 3553(f) of title 31, United States Code,

by paragraph (2) of section 1403(c)—

(A) strike out ‘‘person’’ both places it appears and insert

in lieu thereof ‘‘party’’; and

(B) strike out ‘‘subparagraph (C)’’ and insert in lieu

thereof ‘‘subparagraph (B)’’.

(2) In the matter proposed to be inserted in section 111(f)(5)

of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of

1949 by subsection (a) of section 1435, insert after ‘‘and no

party’’ in the second sentence the following: ‘‘(other than a

small business concern (within the meaning of section 3(a)

of the Small Business Act))’’.

(3) In the matter proposed to be added at the end of

the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act by section 4101—

(A) strike out ‘‘subsection (c)’’ in subsection (a)(2) of

such matter and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘subsection (b)’’;

and

(B) strike out ‘‘subsection (a)’’ in subsection (b) of such

matter and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘subsection (a)(2)’’.

(4) In the matter proposed to be added at the end of

the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act by section 8003,

strike out ‘‘subsections (a)’’ in subsection (c) of such matter

and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘subsections (a)(2)’’.
H. Con. Res. 291—2

(5) In subsection (c) of section 10001, strike out ‘‘and 7207’’

and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘and 7206’’.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 817

_____________________________
R USSELL K. S IMARD , Appellant,

v.

F LORIDA D EPARTMENT O F C ORRECTIONS , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Karen Gievers , Judge

. September 25, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
M AKAR , O STERHAUS , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Russell K. Simard, pro se, Appellant

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Erich Messenger
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahass ee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 99.6

BORDERSGROUP, INC.

STATEMENTOF GREGORY P. JOSEFOWICZ, CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OFBORDERS GROUP, INC. PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory P. Josefowicz,certify that the Form 10-Q, dated July 28, 2002, of Borders Group, Inc. fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the informationcontained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Borders Group, Inc. 

|  |                                                     |                                                                                           |  |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|  | Date:     December 9, 2002 | By:     /s/Gregory P. Josefowicz                                 |  |
|  |                                                     |           Gregory P. Josefowicz         |  |
|  |                                                     |           Chairman, President and Chief |  |
|  |                                                     |           Executive Officer             |  |