### Instructions for filling in the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate runs or sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in green are populated using drop

- down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg Hg +2

### , or if the Ontario

- Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg 0

### , HgP, and Hg Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi

-Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of test run/sample. 2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop

- downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero. 2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided. 3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate. 4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

Emission Data

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and ppmvd @ 7% O 2 

### (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please also enter these data.

### This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet.

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg0 

### and , HgP, and Hg +2 

### . However, both the Speciated Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

- down provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions

2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples,

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and

(parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please alsoEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

2098 KCP&L GMO Lake Road Unit 6Control Device Configuraton

Listed (by

boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICRListed (by boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICREIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 2098 KCP&L GMO Lake Road Unit 6

1 3/18/2010 17:09:07 2 3/19/2010 9:01:03 3 3/19/2010 15:25:03 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Me asured Value (μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry)

3/18/2010 21:03:27 1.85 Dry 3/19/2010 12:28:01 2.38 Dry 3/19/2010 19:30:04 1.71 Dry

Test End Time Test End Date Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsPlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments (lb/mmBtu)

U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL MV=Avg conc 1.35E-06 N/A U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL MV=Avg conc 1.77E-06 N/A U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL MV=Avg conc 1.30E-06 N/A Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)Fuel Input Rate

654 10.6 11.5 7.5 269317.9 342 70080 620.2 10.7 11.8 7.7 259822.1 336 69760 620.2 10.7 12 7.6 266114 328 73120 Flue Gas Temperature (F) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate
subbituminous

lb/hour Other 17520 bitum inous lb/hour Other See Other Supporting Information subbituminous

lb/hour Other 17440 bitum inous lb/hour Other See Other Supporting Information subbituminous

lb/hour Other 18280 bitum inous lb/hour Other See Other Supporting Information Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method See Other Supporting Information N/A See Other Supporting Information N/A See Other Supporting Information N/A Fuel #3 Fuel #4QA /QC Documentation

Trap ID Section 1

Mass (ng) Section 2

Mass (ng) Total

Mass (ng) Initial

Spike (ng) Total NonSpike (ng)
80% Subbitum inous coal Fuel #1 and 20% bituminous coal fuel #2. Also, 177.1 MCF of natural gas fuel #3 at the start of run. 68706 108 1.8 109.8 0 109.8 80% Subbitum inous coal Fuel #1 and 20% bituminous coal fuel #2. Also, 168.9 MCF of natural gas fuel #3 at the start of run 68740 135 1.1 136.1 0 136.1 80% Subbitum inous coal Fuel #1 and 20% bituminous coal fuel #2. Also, 147.2 MCF of natural gas fuel #3 at the start of run 68745 101 2.7 103.7 0 103.7 Other Supporting InformationSample

Volume (dscm) Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough

(%) Breaktrough

Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Trap ID

0.055889 0.502861205 1.666666667 1.96460842 68505 0.05647 0.510560197 0.814814815 2.410129272 65445 0.057589 0.511447602 2.673267327 1.800691104 65486 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ≤20% of field recovery test ≤10% of Section 1 Hg
ma ss for Hg conc. >1
μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section Trap #1Section 1

Mass Section 2

Mass Total

Mass Initial

Spike Total NonSpike Sample

Volume Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit
193 2.4 195.4 100 95.4 0.055253 0.497138795 227 2 229 100 129 0.054134 0.489439803 189 4.4 193.4 100 93.4 0.055011 0.488552398 ≤20% of field recovery test Trap #2Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit C rec
1.243523316 1.72660308 0.238005 6.447892 3.53646 0.881057269 2.382975579 0.027154 0.566516 4.230243 2.328042328 1.69784225 0.102849 2.939771 3.515661 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Me asured Spike Recovery ( R ) Paired Trap Agreement (RD)

≥ 10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or
≤20% RD or ≤ 0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff. for Hg conc. ≤1 ≤10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg conc. >1
μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section 1 for Hg conc. ≤1R (%) by

Run Ravg(%) Limit

86.8 98.5 94.3 Average Recovery
, between 85 and 115% Me asured Spike Recovery ( R )

93.2