alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement
(the “Amendment”), dated as of August 20, 2015, is entered into by and between Vringo, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), and Andrew D. Perlman (the “Executive”), for purposes of amending the terms
of that certain Employment Agreement dated February 13, 2013 (the “Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive
desire to extend the time period by three months for the negotiation of a new employment agreement and the expiration of the Agreement
by amending certain terms of the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties amend the Agreement and agree as follows:


 


1.All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have
the same meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.


 


2.The following shall replace the first sentence of
Section 2 of the Agreement:


 


“The Company hereby agrees to employ Executive,
and Executive hereby accepts employment with the Company, upon the terms set forth in this Agreement, for the period commencing
on the Effective Date and ending on May 13, 2016, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the provisions of Section 9 below
(such period is the "Employment Period").”


 


3.Executive and the Company acknowledge that this Amendment
will extend the time period to commence the Negotiations Period (as defined in the Agreement).


 


4.Executive acknowledges that this Amendment,
the execution thereof, and any communications or negotiations between Executive and the Company related to this Amendment or otherwise,
do not constitute a Good Reason termination (as defined in the Agreement) under the Agreement.


 


5.This Amendment shall be governed by and construed
in accordance with the domestic laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provision
or rule (whether the State of New York or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction
other than the State of New York.


 






    	 	1	 



     


    

 


6.This Amendment may be executed in
one or more counterparts, any one of which may be by facsimile, and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same
instrument.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 





	 	VRINGO, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ John Engelman
	 	Name:  	John Engelman
	 	Title:	Chair of the Compensation
	 	 	Committee of the Board of Directors
	 	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE:
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Andrew D. Perlman
	 	Andrew D. Perlman




 






    	 	2
#### BILLS v. STATE.

No. 26477.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 10, 1953.

*805No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of driving while intoxicated as a second offender; his punishment assessed at a term of two years; the execution of the sentence was probated in accordance with the terms of Article 781b, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P.

This is an appeal from an order revoking such probation.

No statement of facts or bills of exception accompany the record.

In appeals of this nature, the only matter presented for review is whether the trial court abused his discretion in revoking the order granting probation.

In the absence of a statement of facts, we are unable to determine whether such discretion was abused. Graves v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 256 S.W.2d 576.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i

FOR THE NORTHERN DTSTRTCT OF TEXAS i

DALLAS DIVISION I

I

\()R :]]:R\ i)iS.- iiL I OF IE\AS

FILEL)

t_iYll'j"J

K- U,S DISIRIC]T COLRT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS'

BRYAI\ PURYEAR

CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-167-K (01)

REPORT AI\D RECOMMEI\IDATION

CONCER}TING PLEA OF GTIILTY

BRYAN PURYEAR, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir.

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. I l, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 2

of the 2-Count Indictment, filed on April 26,2022. After cautioning and examining Defendant Bryan

Puryear, under oath conceming each of the subjects mentioned in Rule I 1, I determined that the guilty plea

was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact

containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be

accepted, and that Defendant Bryan Puryear, be adjudged guilty of Attempted Acquisition of a Firearm

from a Licensed Firearms Dealer by False or Fictitious Statement, in violation of 18 USC S

922(a)(6)and924(a)Q), md have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense

by the district judge.

The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 3la3(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear

and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the

community if released.

The Govemment does not oppose release.

The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release'

I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to

any other person or the community if released and should therefore be released under $ 3142(b) ot

(c).

D The Govemment opposes release.

D The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release'

tr If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the

Government.

The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 3la3(a)(2) unless (lXa) the Court finds there

is a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly

shown under g 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the

community if released.

Signed August 30,2022.

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date

of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United

States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. $636(bX1XB).

Cl.ER

$

s

s

$

$

tr

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00167-K Document 18 Filed 08/30/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 42
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
2000 FORM 10-QSB OF CSB FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             856
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     15,876
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             243
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               243
<LOANS>                                         30,623
<ALLOWANCE>                                        222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,051
<DEPOSITS>                                      36,927
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                195
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,319
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  49,051
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,758
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  792
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,550
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,168
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,207
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,343
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       17
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (3)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     65
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          97
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        97
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   222
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       17
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  222
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               222
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67729-67730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28928]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-367-012]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

November 6, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 30, 2000, Northwest Pipeline 
Corporation (Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be 
effective December 1, 2000:

    Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 8
    Tenth Revised Sheet No. 8.1

    Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to implement 
rate design changes to Northwest's Rate Schedule LS-1, LS-2F, and LS-21 
LNG storage services consistent with the Commission's resolution of LNG 
storage services rate design issues in Northwest's Docket No. RP95-409 
and pursuant to the terms of the Commission-approved Settlement in 
Northwest's Docket No. RP96-367.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

[[Page 67730]]

    Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet 
in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions 
on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28928 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### BINGHAM v. STATE.

No. 22340.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 16, 1942.

Aubrey Davee, of Brady, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Upon a trial before a jury appellant was fined $150 for a violation of the local option liquor law of McCulloch County.

There are no bills of exception in the record, and the statement of facts reflect a sale of whisky in a dry area.

All proceedings appear to be regular, and the judgment is affirmed.
(logo) BERKADIA

 

 

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 (the“Reporting Period”)

** **

*CreditSuisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.,*

*Series2015-C1*

 

Pursuant to Section10.07 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the referencedtransaction (the “Servicing Agreement”), I hereby attest that:

 

     i.   A review of the activities and performance of Berkadia asSubservicer during the Reporting Period has been made under my supervision.

 

    ii.     To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in all material respects, itsobligations under this Subservicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Periodand no default by the Subservicer under the Subservicing Agreement has occurredand is continuing.

 

 

Berkadia,

 

/s/ Mark E. McCool

Mark E. McCool

President

February 10, 2019
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  550 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

** **

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2015, by andamong CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTOCAPITAL   ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICESLLC, as Operating Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asCertificate Administrator, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series2015-C2 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.07 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of itsobligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 88

Recognizing and commending American airmen held as prisoners of war

at the Buchenwald concentration camp during World War II for their

service, bravery, and fortitude.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 27, 1993

Mr. MONTGOMERY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing and commending American airmen held as prisoners of war at the Buchenwald concentration camp during World War II for their service, bravery, and fortitude.

Whereas, during World War II, 173 Allied airmen were captured by the enemy and held as prisoners of war at the

Buchenwald concentration camp in Weimar, Germany;

Whereas the captured airmen included 81 Americans, 27 Canadians, and 65 Britons, Australians, and New Zealanders;

Whereas the facts and circumstances of their confinement are

amply documented in the official records maintained by

the National Archives and Records Administration;
2

•HCON 88 IH

Whereas a report from the International Red Cross concerning Stalag Luft III in Sagan, Germany, mentioned 6

American airmen held at Buchenwald, including 1 whose

name does not appear on the lists maintained by the National Archives;

Whereas, since the liberation of Buchenwald in 1945, numerous personal memoirs, scholarly books, and articles have

been published describing the conditions at the concentration camp;

Whereas this extensive documentation records the extraordinarily inhuman treatment, deprivations, and personal

suffering inflicted on prisoners of war and other inmates

at Buchenwald; and

Whereas Allied Governments and veterans organizations outside the United States have granted special recognition to

their citizens and members who were held as prisoners of

war in World War II concentration camps: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes and commends the valiant Amer4 ican airmen held as prisoners of war at the Buchen5 wald concentration camp during World War II for

6 their faithful service, personal bravery, and excep7 tional fortitude; and

8 (2) requests that the President issue a procla9 mation recognizing and commending the service,

10 bravery, and fortitude of the American airmen.

Æ
#### SCHUH v. STATE.

No. 23036.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 17, 1945.

Dave Watson and Theo. P. Henley, both of San Antonio, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for murder, punishment assessed at twenty-five years in the penitentiary.

The record before us contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed. .
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeneLink, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, John R. DePhillipo, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of his knowledge that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods shown in such report.

Date:  May 12, 2004                     By:          /s/ John R. DePhillipo
                                            ------------------------------------
                                             John R. DePhillipo, Chief Executive
                                             Officer and Chief Financial Officer


                                      -14-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00053-Z-BR

§

CRYSTAL ANN PEREZ (2) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

CRYSTAL ANN PEREZ (2), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), 

has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 5 of the Indictment. After 

cautioning and examining CRYSTAL ANN PEREZ (2) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, 

I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that CRYSTAL ANN PEREZ (2) be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b) - UNLAWFUL USE 

OF A COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense 

by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: August 17, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00053-Z-BR Document 63 Filed 08/17/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 142
Case 2:22-mj-00099-BR Document 22 Filed 06/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 30