alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) announces a meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress. The committee advises NARA on the full range of programs, policies, and plans for the Center for Legislative Archives in the Office of Records Services. 

# DATES:

December 4, 2000, from 10:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

United States Capitol Building, Room S-211. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael L. Gillette, Director, Center for Legislative Archives, (202) 501-5350. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Agenda 

Third Report to Congress

Capitol Visitors Center 

                    Other current issues and new business                           ( print page 69052)    

The meeting is open to the public. 

Dated: November 8, 2000.

Mary Ann Hadyka, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 00-29106 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7515-01-U
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Paul A. Maleh, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CRA International, Inc.; and

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date:   April 25, 2014 | By:    | /s/   PAUL A. MALEH                     |
|-----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Paul   A. Maleh                         |
|                        |   | President   and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Amended Annual Report of Entrust Financial Services, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2001 as
filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report). I, David A. Hite, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 USC § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ David A. Hite
David A. Hite, Chief Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------

Dated: FEBRUARY
14, 2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Plaintiff

Defendant

v.

Civil Action No.

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS 

(This form also satisfies Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1)

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and LR 3.1(c), LR 3.2(e), LR 7.4, LR 81.1(a)(4)(D), and LR 81.2,

provides the following information:

 For a nongovernmental corporate party, the name(s) of its parent corporation and any 

publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its stock (if none, state "None"): 

*Please separate names with a comma. Only text visible within box will print.

 A complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, 

guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporations, or other legal entities that are 

financially interested in the outcome of the case: 

*Please separate names with a comma. Only text visible within box will print.

Fort Worth Division

Maurie Moore

4:22-CV-00201-Y

Carvana, LLC

Carvana, LLC

Carvana, LLC is owned by Carvana Co., which is a publicly traded company on The New York 

Stock Exchange trading under the ticker symbol CVNA. Carvana, LLC does not have any other 

parent corporation or publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its stock.

Maurie Moore, Plaintiff 

Eric Rogers of Spielberger Law Group, counsel for Plaintiff 

Carvana, LLC, Defendant 

Kimberly R. Miers and Ross G. Reyes of Littler Mendelson, counsel for Defendant 

Case 4:22-cv-00201-Y Document 11 Filed 05/26/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 38
Date:

Signature:

Print Name:

Telephone:

Address:

City, State, Zip:

Bar Number:

Fax:

E-Mail:

NOTE: To electronically file this document, you will find the event in our Case Management (CM/ECF) system, under Civil/Other 

Documents/Certificate of Interested Persons

May 26, 2022

/s/ Kimberly R. Miers

Kimberly R. Miers

24041482

100 Congress Ave., Suite 1400

Austin TX 78701

512-924-7087

512-532-6501

kmiers@littler.com

Case 4:22-cv-00201-Y Document 11 Filed 05/26/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 39
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Frank, Clements and Haley 

LABCORP OF AMERICA AND 

 CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY 

 INSURANCE COMPANY 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2791-04-2 PER CURIAM 

 MAY 10, 2005 

KATHY C. BEY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Roger L. Williams; John T. Cornett, Jr.; Williams & Lynch, on 

brief), for appellants. 

 No brief for appellee. 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

 Labcorp of America and its insurer (hereinafter referred to as “employer”) appeal a 

decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that Kathy C. Bey proved she 

sustained a head injury, post-traumatic stress syndrome, and psychiatric problems as a result of 

her June 13, 2003 compensable injury by accident. We have reviewed the record and the 

commission’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the commission in its final opinion. See Bey v. Labcorp of America, VWC File No. 

215-51-01 (Oct. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.
Order entered October 31, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00619-CV

LUIS A. SANTIAGO, ET AL., Appellants

V.

NOVASTAR MORTGAGE, INC., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-02073-2011

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ October 28, 2013, unopposed motion for an extension of time to 

file a reply brief. Appellants shall file their reply brief on or before November 21, 2013.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

RONNIE JAMES CURTIS, §

TDCJ No. 297634, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-1188-M

§

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE AND DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a 

Recommendation in this case. An objection was filed by Petitioner [ECF No. 8]. The 

District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions, 

and Recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining 

proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding no 

error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge.

Considering the record in this case and pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 22(b), Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing §§ 2254 and 2255 proceedings, 

and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. The Court 

adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions, 

and Recommendation filed in this case in support of its finding that Petitioner has 

Case 3:22-cv-01188-M-BN Document 9 Filed 08/03/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 49
2

failed to show that reasonable jurists would find “it debatable whether the petition 

states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” or “debatable whether [this 

Court] was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000).1

But, if Petitioner elects to file a notice of appeal, he must either pay the 

appropriate filing fee ($505) or move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

SO ORDERED this 3rd day of August, 2022.

1

 Rule 11 of the Rules Governing §§ 2254 and 2255 Cases, as amended effective on 

December 1, 2009, reads as follows: 

(a) Certificate of Appealability. The district court must issue or deny a 

certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant. Before 

entering the final order, the court may direct the parties to submit arguments on whether a 

certificate should issue. If the court issues a certificate, the court must state the specific issue 

or issues that satisfy the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). If the court denies a 

certificate, the parties may not appeal the denial but may seek a certificate from the court of 

appeals under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22. A motion to reconsider a denial does 

not extend the time to appeal.

(b) Time to Appeal. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) governs the time 

to appeal an order entered under these rules. A timely notice of appeal must be filed even if 

the district court issues a certificate of appealability.

Case 3:22-cv-01188-M-BN Document 9 Filed 08/03/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 50
Order entered December 13, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01256-CV

DEANNA AI LEE, Appellant

V.

KEVIN DUC NGUYEN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-22786

ORDER

The reporter’s record is overdue. The court received notice from the court reporter that 

appellant had not requested preparation of the reporter’s record. By letter dated November 26, 

2018, we instructed appellant to provide, within ten days, written verification that she had 

requested preparation of the reporter’s record and that she had paid or made arrangements to pay 

the reporter’s fee. We cautioned appellant that failure to comply may result in the Court 

ordering the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. As of today’s date, appellant has not 

responded. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal be submitted without the reporter’s record. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). Appellant’s brief is due WITHIN THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order. 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ROBERT HOPKINS, III,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,

Defendant.

No. 3:22-CV-00706-C

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CROSS-MOTION 

TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER

Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Future Deadlines and Defendant’s 

Cross-Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, Defendant’s Motion is hereby GRANTED. 

Specifically:

• The deadlines in this Court’s Scheduling Order, ECF No. 12, are hereby 

STAYED pending decision on Defendant’s forthcoming motion for 

summary judgment.

• Briefing on Plaintiff’s motion to compel, should he choose to file one, is 

hereby STAYED pending decision on Defendant’s forthcoming motion 

for summary judgment.

• All discovery and other proceedings in this matter are hereby STAYED 

pending decision on Defendant’s forthcoming motion for summary 

judgment.

• Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this matter shall be due by 

3:00 p.m. on Friday, August 11, 2023.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________ ____________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00706-C Document 17-1 Filed 05/24/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 397 Case 3:22-cv-00706-E Document 23-3 Filed 06/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 443
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Timothy M. Oxley, Chief Financial Officer of MCBC Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

 

|  | (1) |  | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--|-----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|  | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|               |   |   |   |                                                                                           |
|--------------------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               |   |   |   |                                                                                           |
| September 17, 2015 |   |   |   | /s/ Timothy M. Oxley                                                                           |
|               |   |   |   | Timothy M. Oxley                                                                               |
|               |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

F/R 550, LLC, a Florida limited liability ) company; and F/R 3329, LLC, a Florida ) limited liability company, ) ) Appellants/Cross-Appellees, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-4064 ) NATIONAL AUTO SERVICE CENTERS, ) INC., a Florida corporation; NATIONAL ) AUTO PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida ) corporation; LEONARD D. LEVIN, ) individually; DURANT HOLDINGS, LLC; ) and BEDFORD INVESTMENTS, LLC, ) ) Appellees/Cross-Appellants. ) )

Opinion filed March 30, 2016.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Jack Day, Judge.

Courtney L. Fernald and Leonard S. Englander of Englander Fischer, St. Petersburg, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

Stephen O. Cole and Nancy S. Paikoff of MacFarlane Ferguson & McMullen, Clearwater, and Michael J. Stanton of Stanton Cronin Law Group, PL, Tampa, for Appellees/Cross-Appellants.- 2 - SALARIO, Judge.

In view of our disposition of companion case 2D14-3632, the p artial final

judgment on appeal in this case is reversed. The case is reman ded to the trial court as

stated in our opinion in 2D14-3632.

Reversed and remanded.

VILLANTI, C.J., and LUCAS, J., Concur.
### SERVED: June 

### 15, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC IN THE MATTER OF FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION

FAA DOCKETNO. FAA 2014-0864 (Civil Penalty Action)



### ORDER 

### ON COMPLAINANT'S MOTION FORDECISION The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA") filed a Motion for Decision dated April9, 2015. Federal Express Corporation (hereinafter "FedEx") filed an Answerto the FAA's Motionfor Decision dated April23, 2015. Upon reviewofthe Motion and Answer thereto, we find the matter should proceed to hearing. We do not anticipate reaching this matter prior to November 1, 2015 and will extend discovery deadlines accordingly. WHEREFORE, the within filed Motion for Decision and Answerthereto having been read and considered, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The FAA's Motion for decision be and is hereby DENIED; and 2. On orbefore November 6, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production requests and/or interrogatories. lftheparties cannotresolve a discovery dispute they shall submitthe disputeto theundersigned for resolution in a timely manner; and 3. Theparties shall be prepared to presentthis case at a hearing on or after November 6, 2015, subjectto the availability ofcourtroom facilities. The specific date and time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative LawJudge Attachment- Service ListI

I ]

! l



### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building--Suite 2W1000 1



### Greg Stofko, Respondent's Counsel 

### 1700 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Suite 950 Washington, D.C. 20006 TEL: 202-393-9285 FAX: 202-628-0654 EMAIL: greg.stofko@fedex.com James Archier, Complainant's Counsel 

### Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe Regional Counsel 2601 MeachamBoulevard Fort Worth, TX 76137 TEL: 817-222-5074 FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 ONE COPY

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0864 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WIOOO, Washington. DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
#### PLEASANT v. STATE.

No. 21726.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 12, 1941.

L. D. Griffin, of Alice, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for assault with intent to murder, punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

Since this court obtained jurisdiction it has been made known to the court by proper affidavit that appellant has died since his appeal was perfected.

The prosecution is abated.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

ROBERT (BOB) ROSS, §

§

 Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-CV-343-Y

§

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL § 

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, §

MCGAUGHEY, REBER AND §

ASSOCIATES, INC., JULIE §

HEDRICK, AND ERIK HARRIS, §

§

 Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiff. §

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE

Came on before the Court the motion (doc. 39) of defendants Julie Hedrick, Erik Harris and

defendant/counterclaim plaintiff Association of Professional Flight Attendants (“Union Defendants”)

requesting that the Court take judicial notice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201, of the issuance

on August 24, 2022, of a supplemental arbitration decision in relation to the above reference case. 

As of the date of this order, there has been no response in opposition to the motion. As a result, and

after having considered the motion, the Court concludes that the motion should be and is hereby

GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court takes judicial notice pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201

of the supplemental decision by the Arbitrator, dated August 24, 2022, and titled “SUPPLEMENTAL

DECISION AND REMEDY MODIFICATION,” which was attached as Exhibit 1 to the Union

Defendants’ motion.

SIGNED September 21, 2022.

____________________________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 45 Filed 09/21/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1184
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 67655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28878]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-2423; MM Docket No. 97-130; RM-8751]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Galesburg, IL, and Ottumwa, IA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document denies a Petition for Reconsideration filed by 
Galesburg Broadcasting Company directed to the Report and Order in this 
proceeding which upgraded Station KTWA, Ottumwa, Iowa, to specify 
operation on Channel 224C2. See 63 FR 57608, October 28, 1998. With 
this action, the proceeding is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Mass Media Bureau (202) 
418-2177

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order in MM Docket No. 97-130, adopted October 
18, 2000, and released October 27, 2000. The full text of this decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Information Center at Portals 11, CY-A257, 445 12th 
Street, SW, Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also 
be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3805, 1231 M Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-28878 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U