alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28948]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact 
for the U.S. Park Police (USPP) Aviation Section Hangar and Fuel System 
Improvements, Washington, DC

ACTION: Notice of availability of the Decision Notice and Finding of No 
Significant Impact (FONSI) for the U.S. Park Police Aviation Section 
Hangar and Fuel System Improvements--National Capital Parks--East, 
Washington, DC.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 
Council on Environmental Quality regulations, and National Park Service 
(NPS) guidance, the NPS prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for 
the construction of an additional aviation hangar and a new fueling 
station at the existing USPP Aviation Section's heliport in Washington, 
DC. The EA contained analysis developed as a result of public comments 
on a draft version obtained during a 30-day public review on the draft 
EA. The availability of the EA for a second 30-day public comment 
period was announced in the Federal Register on August 29, 2000. After 
the comment period, NPS selected the preferred alternative which is the 
proposed action, followed by a November 2, 2000 finding of no 
significant environmental impact.
    These improvements are to the USPP heliport, which is an existing 
facility in Anacostia Park, National Capital Parks-East, and is used 
for helicopters that are the only law enforcement and emergency rescue 
helicopters serving Washington, DC. The project would construct an 
approximately 6,100-square-foot aviation hangar and replace the fuel 
trucks on-site by installation of a new environmentally protective 
fueling station. All improvements would be completely located within 
the existing area of the heliport with no increase in the size of the 
heliport footprint, and with three-fourths acre of paving removed and 
restored to grass.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Requests for copies of the DN/FONSI/EA, or 
for any additional information, should be directed to Mr. Michael 
Wilderman, National Capital Parks-East, 1900 Anacostia Drive, SE., 
Washington, DC 20020, Telephone (202) 690-5165.

    Dated: November 6, 2000.
Gentry Davis,
Acting Regional Director, National Park Service, National Capital 
Region.
[FR Doc. 00-28948 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Secured Digital  Applications,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly  period ending  June 30,
2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Voon Fui Yong, Chief Accounting Officer (principal financial
officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Voon Fui Yong
-------------------
Voon Fui Yong
Chief Accounting Officer
June 15, 2006
#### JAQUES v. SIMMS.

No. 9393; Motion No. 9997.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

June 23, 1943.

For former opinion, see 171 S.W.2d 924.

Cofer *&*Cofer, of Austin, for appellant.

Hornsby, Hornsby & Kirk, of Austin, for appellee.

McClendon, chief justice.

Appellant filed a motion for rehearing and (at the same time) a motion to certify certain questions to the Supreme Court. A second motion to certify has been filed, ostensibly upon the theory that the first *538motion (filed prior to overruling the motion for rehearing) was not in compliance with Rule 465 Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, which reads: “At any time within fifteen days after overruling the motion for rehearing either party may file a motion asking the court to certify a question to the Supreme Court. After the expiration of that date, if no motion is filed, the court may not be required by mandamus to certify.”

As pointed out in Hursey v. Bond, Tex.Sup., 172 S.W.2d 305, before this rule was promulgated, it was a prerequisite to the right to require the Court of Civil Appeals by mandamus to certify, that a timely motion therefor be made and refused. The effect of the rule was merely to set a definite time limit beyond which the motion might not be filed. In the respect that the rule required the motion, it was as shown but declaratory of preexisting procedure. We read nothing in the rule which would require a party to await action on the motion for rehearing before filing motion to certify. It is common practice to file these motions at the same time, either separately or in a single motion in the alternative. Either method we believe constitutes compliance with the rule; since its purpose is to require re1 quest of the Court of Civil Appeals and its refusal, before resort to mandamus. It is not material whether this request be made prior or subsequent to action on the rehearing motion. If that motion is granted, the motion to certify becomes unimportant. If the original opinion or holding is changed, this may require amendment of a pending motion to certify, or a second motion if the first has already been overruled. Absent any change in the holding or opinion, which is the case here, there is no occasion to again ask the court to do what it has already refused.

For these reasons appellant’s second motion to certify is dismissed.

Motion dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 67319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28810]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[FRL-6899-4]


Supplemental Information To Support Proposed Approvals of One-
Hour Ozone Attainment Demonstrations for Serious Ozone Nonattainment 
Areas; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability and extension of comment period; 
correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 2, 2000 (65 FR 65818), EPA published a notice of 
availability and reopening of comment period to provide the public with 
the opportunity to comment on a reasonably available control measures 
(RACM) analysis that EPA performed. In that document EPA stated that 
the comment period would be extended 15 additional days, but in the 
Dates Section there was a typographical error that stated that the 
comment period would close on November 15, 2001. The EPA's original 
intent was to extend the comment period 15 additional days, therefore 
the comment period is only being extended to November 15, 2000.

    Dated: November 3, 2000.
Henry C. Thomas,
Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.

DATES: The comment period closes on November 15, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Silvasi at (919) 541-5666.
[FR Doc. 00-28810 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
From: Howard L. Gilberg [ mailto:Gilberg@guidaslavichflores.com ]

Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 4:55 PM

To: Nizich, Sharon; Barnett, Keith; Fruh, Steve; Tsirigotis, Peter; Ginsburg, Eric

Cc: Connie O'Neal; Eric Astrachan; Robert Hurt; Steve Wiederwax; Steve Willis

Subject: Florim May 2010 Stack Test: Request for Removal of Kiln 1 HF and HCl Data from MACT

Floor Data Set

Attachment: Scanned from a Xerox multifunction device001.pdf



### Sharon:

By the attached letter from Florim USA, we are requesting removal of the Florim USA May

2010 Kiln 1 HF and HCl Kiln 1 data from MACT Floor data set. This presentation arises, in part

from EPA and RTI questioning sua sponte the aberrational nature of the data from Run 2 in our

March 28 meeting. That questioning and other matters led Florim to carefully revisit Run 2.

You will recall that EPA has agreed, following our March 28 meeting, to remove the data

generated in Run 3 of this stack test from the MACT Floor data set.

We request that EPA carefully consider and act on the attached letter. If there are any questions

on its content, please contact me.

In the meantime, do you have a report for us on the EPA’s considerati on of Mr. Hartman’s

corrected critique of the Stonepeak 2005 stack testing results, which I emailed to you at about

2:00 pm CDT on July 11?

Thank you.

Howard

Howard L. Gilberg

Guida, Slavich & Flores, P.C.

750 North St. Paul Street, Suite 200

Dallas, TX 75201

214.692

- 0009

- office

214.392

- 5230

- mobile

gilberg@gsfpc.com

www.theenvironmentallawfirm.com
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 319

To express the sense of Congress regarding regulation of mercury hazardous

waste, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 29, 1994

Mr. SABO (for himself and Mr. TORRES) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To express the sense of Congress regarding regulation of

mercury hazardous waste, and for other purposes.

Whereas there has been a 2- to 3-fold global increase in mercury in the environment since the 1850’s, increases of 3.4

times have been found in wilderness areas of the United

States, and much higher increases have been found in developed areas of the United States;

Whereas mercury is truly a national and international concern because mercury is atmospherically transported indiscriminately across political boundaries;

Whereas mercury poses a serious and growing public health

and environmental problem even when released in minute

quantities;
2

•HCON 319 IH

Whereas mercury presents particular problems in aquatic systems where mercury bioaccumulates;

Whereas human consumption advisories have been issued in

at least 34 States because of the high levels of mercury

contamination in fish, resulting in losses to the tourism

and fishing industries and related activities;

Whereas atmospheric deposition resulting from human activities, including waste disposal, contributes most of the

mercury loading to the environment;

Whereas numerous studies have indicated that mercury-containing lamps will soon become the largest contributor of

mercury to municipal waste streams in the United States;

Whereas the United States, through the Environmental Protection Agency, is working cooperatively within the international community to reduce global risks of mercury in

the environment;

Whereas the Environmental Protection Agency is already actively supporting efforts to virtually eliminate releases of

mercury in the Great Lakes Region; and

Whereas the waste management priorities of the United

States encourage recycling before waste disposal: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the En3 vironmental Protection Agency should not exempt mercury

4 hazardous wastes from hazardous waste regulation but in5 stead should adopt waste management policies and rules

6 that seek to minimize all releases of mercury into the envi7 ronment while encouraging the recycling of mercury-con-
3

•HCON 319 IH

1 taining fluorescent lamps and other mercury-containing

2 devices.

Æ
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc. 

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C27

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of March 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

|  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08132013 [8/20/2013 1:45:50 PM] Get Email Updates Contact Us

Home • The Administration • Office of Management and Budget

REGULATION & INFORMATION POLICY 

### About OIRA Information Policy Federal Collection of Information Regulatory Matters

Meetings and Outside Communication Reports to Congress For Agencies Statistical Programs & Standards 

# Meeting Record

Meeting Record Regarding: Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generation Units Date: 8 / 13 / 2013

Name Affiliation Client (if applicable) Nathan Frey OMB/OIRA Bob Wayland EPA

Nick Hudson EPA Barry Ellman EPA

Bill Stevens EPA

Paul Balzerack EPA

Drew McConville CEQ

Anne Finken CEQ Jim Laity OMB/OIRA Marty McBrooch American Electric Power

Matt Usher American Electric Power American Electric Power Stephen Fatis Vanness Feldman Generations for Clean Air

Rachel Miller Forbes Tate Generations for Clean Air Greg Ryan DTE Kevin Leahy Duke Energy 

### About OMBlog The Budget Management Regulation & Information Policy Legislative Information Join OMB Contact OMB

Home The White House Blog

Photos & Videos

Photo Galleries Video Performances Briefing Room Your Weekly Address Speeches & Remarks Press Briefings Statements & Releases White House Schedule Presidential Actions Issues Civil Rights Defense Disabilities Economy Education Energy & Environment The Administration

President Barack Obama Vice President Joe Biden First Lady Michelle Obama Dr. Jill Biden The Cabinet White House Staff About the White House

Inside the White House Presidents First Ladies The Oval Office The Vice President's Residence & Office Our Government

The Executive Branch The Legislative Branch The Judicial Branch The Constitution Federal Agencies & Commissions Federal Register | Join OMB | FOIA | No FEAR Act | OMB Locator | USA.Gov | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site SearchMeeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08132013 [8/20/2013 1:45:50 PM] Live Streams Podcasts Legislation Nominations & Appointments Disclosures Ethics Equal Pay Foreign Policy Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Refinancing Rural Service Seniors & Social Security Snapshots Taxes Technology Urban and Economic Mobility Veterans Violence Prevention Women Executive Office of the President Other Advisory Boards Eisenhower Executive Office Building Camp David Air Force One White House Fellows White House Internships Tours & Events Mobile Apps Elections & Voting State & Local Government Resources

En español Accessibility Copyright Information Privacy Policy Contact USA.gov Developers Apply for a Job
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coinstar, Inc. (the“***Company***”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Form 10-Q***”), I, David W. Cole, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: August 9, 2007
#### CRAIN v. STATE.

No. 26046.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 19, 1952.

*710No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, three years.

No statement of facts or bills of exception accompany the record.

The trial court, when sentencing the appellant, failed to give application to the indeterminate sentence law.

The sentence is now reformed to read “not less than two nor more than three years” and as reformed is affirmed.
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Arkansas Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Arkansas Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 3,700  | 4,400  | 4,400  | 4,400  | 4,400  | 4,400  | 4,400  | 4,400 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 4,500  | 4,500  | 4,500  | 4,500  | 4,900  | 4,900  | NA     | 4,900  | NA     | 4,900 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4,900  | 4,900  | 4,900  | 4,900  | 4,900  | 5,000  | 5,000  | 5,000  | 5,000  | 5,000 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5,000  | 5,000  | 5,000  | 5,000  | 5,000  | 5,000  | 5,000  | 5,000  | 5,000  | 5,000 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5,000  | 5,000  | 5,000  | 5,000  | 5,000  |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 
 STATEMENT
        OF GREGORY P. JOSEFOWICZ,
 CHAIRMAN,
        PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF BORDERS GROUP, INC.
 PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I,
        Gregory P. Josefowicz, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October
        22, 2005, of Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of
        section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
        and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents,
        in
        all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of
        Borders Group, Inc.
 
 Date:
        November 23, 2005
 
 /s/
        GREGORY P. JOSEFOWICZ
 Gregory
        P. Josefowicz
 Chairman,
        President and Chief Executive Officer
 Borders
        Group, Inc.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Borders Group, Inc. and will be retained by Borders Group, Inc. and furnished
        to
        the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.