67400 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices

Estimated Annual Reporting and

Recordkeeping ‘‘Non-hour Cost’’

Burden: n/a.

Comments: The Paperwork Reduction

Act at 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A) requires

each agency ‘‘to provide notice * * *

and otherwise consult with members of

the public and affected agencies

concerning each proposed collection of

information.* * *’’ Agencies must

specifically solicit comments to: (a)

Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the agency to perform its duties,

including whether the information is

useful; (b) evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information; (c)

enhance the quality, usefulness, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and (d) minimize the burden

on the respondents, including the use of

automated collection techniques or

other forms of information technology.

The Paperwork Reduction Act also

requires agencies to estimate the total

annual reporting ‘‘non-hour cost’’

burden to respondents or recordkeepers

resulting from the collection of

information. We have not identified

non-hour cost burdens and need to

know if there are other costs associated

with the collection of this information

for either total capital and startup cost

components or annual operation,

maintenance, and purchase of service

components. Your estimates should

consider the costs to generate, maintain,

and disclose or provide the information.

You should describe the methods you

use to estimate major cost factors,

including system and technology

acquisition, expected useful life of

capital equipment, discount rate(s), and

the period over which you incur costs.

Capital and startup costs include,

among other items, computers and

software you purchase to prepare for

collecting information; monitoring,

sampling, drilling, and testing

equipment; and record storage facilities.

Your estimates should not include

equipment or services purchased: (i)

Before October 1, 1995; (ii) to comply

with requirements not associated with

the information collection; (iii) for

reasons other than to provide

information or keep records for the

Government; or (iv) as part of customary

and usual business or private practices.

The Paperwork Reduction Act

provides that an agency shall not

conduct or sponsor, and a person is not

required to respond to, a collection of

information unless it displays a

currently valid OMB Control Number.

Dated: November 3, 2000.

Cathy Hamilton,

Acting Associate Director for Minerals

Revenue Management.

[FR Doc. 00–28822 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Boston Harbor Islands Advisory

Council; Notice of Meeting

Notice is hereby given in accordance

with the Federal Advisory Committee

Act (Pub. L. 92–463) that the Boston

Harbor Islands Advisory Council will

meet on Wednesday, December 6, 2000.

The meeting will convene at 4:00 p.m.

at the New England Aquarium

Education Center, Long Wharf, Boston,

Massachusetts.

The Advisory Council was appointed

by the Director of National Park Service

pursuant to Public Law 104–333. The 28

members represent business,

educational, cultural, and

environmental entities; municipalities

surrounding Boston Harbor; Boston

Harbor advocates; and Native American

interests. The purpose of the Council is

to advise and make recommendations to

the Boston Harbor Islands Partnership

with respect to the development and

implementation of a management plan

and the operation of the Boston Harbor

Islands National Recreation Area.

The Agenda for this meeting is as

follows:

1. Approval of minutes from September

6, 2000

2. Discussion regarding the park

operations ‘‘report card’’

3. Discussion on water transportation

issues

The meeting is open to the public.

Further information concerning Council

meetings may be obtained from the

Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands.

Interested persons may make oral/

written presentations to the Council or

file written statements. Such requests

should be made at least seven days prior

to the meeting to: Superintendent,

Boston Harbor Islands NRA, 408

Atlantic Ave., Boston, MA, 02110,

telephone (617) 223–8667.

Dated: November 1, 2000.

George E. Price, Jr.,

Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands NRA.

[FR Doc. 00–28837 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Project Improvement

Act, Criteria for Evaluating Water

Management Plans

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation,

Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: To meet the requirements of

the Central Valley Project Improvement

Act (CVPIA) of 1992 and the

Reclamation Reform Act of 1982,

Reclamation developed and published

the Criteria for Evaluating Water

Conservation Plans, dated April 30,

1993. In September 1996, Reclamation

revised the document and renamed it to

Criteria for Evaluating Water

Management Plans (Criteria). The

Criteria were revised again in 1999.

The Cities of Avenal, Coalinga, and

Huron, along with Broadview Water

District and West Stanislaus Irrigation

District, all have developed Water

Management Plans (Plan) which

Reclamation has evaluated and

preliminarily determined to meet the

requirements of the Criteria.

The 1999 Criteria were developed

based on information provided during

public scoping and review sessions held

throughout Reclamation’s Mid-Pacific

(MP) Region. Reclamation uses these

Criteria to evaluate the adequacy of all

Plans developed by Central Valley

Project contractors. The Criteria were

developed and the Plans have been

evaluated for the purpose of promoting

the most efficient water use reasonably

achievable by all MP Region contractors.

Reclamation made a commitment

(stated within the Criteria) to publish a

notice of its draft determination of the

adequacy of each contractor’s Plan in

the Federal Register to allow the public

a minimum of 30 days to comment on

its preliminary determinations.

DATES: All public comments must be

received by December 11, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Our practice is to make

comments, including names and home

addresses of respondents, available for

public review. Individual respondents

may request that we withhold their

home address from public disclosure,

which we will honor to the extent

allowable by law. There also may be

circumstances in which we would

withhold a respondent’s identity from

public disclosure, as allowable by law.

If you wish us to withhold your name

and/or address, you must state this

prominently at the beginning of your

comment. We will make all submissions

from organizations or businesses, and

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices 67401

from individuals identifying themselves

as representatives or officials of

organizations or businesses, available

for public disclosure in their entirety.

Please mail comments to Lucille

Billingsley, Bureau of Reclamation,

2800 Cottage Way, MP–410, Sacramento

CA 95825.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To

be placed on a mailing list for any

subsequent information, please contact

Lucille Billingsley at the address above,

or by telephone at (916) 978–5215 (TDD,

978–5608).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under

provision of Section 3405(e) of the

CVPIA (Title 34 Pub. L. 102–575), ‘‘The

Secretary [of the Interior] shall establish

and administer an office on Central

Valley Project water conservation best

management practices that

shall*** develop criteria for

evaluating the adequacy of all water

conservation plans developed by project

contractors, including those plans

required by section 210 of the

Reclamation Reform Act of 1982.’’ Also,

according to Section 3405(e)(1), these

criteria will be developed ‘‘* * * with

the purpose of promoting the highest

level of water use efficiency reasonably

achievable by project contractors using

best available cost-effective technology

and best management practices.’’

The Criteria states that all parties

(Contractors) that contract with

Reclamation for water supplies

(municipal and industrial contracts over

2,000 irrigable acre-feet and agricultural

contracts over 2,000 irrigable acres) will

prepare Plans which will be evaluated

by Reclamation based on the following

required information detailed in the

sections listed below to develop,

implement, monitor, and update their

Plans. The sections are:

1. Description of the District.

2. Inventory of Water Resources.

3. Best Management Practices (BMPs)

for Agricultural Contractors.

4. BMP’s for Urban Contractors.

5. Plan Implementation.

6. Exemption Process.

7. Regional Criteria.

8. Five Year Revisions.

Public comment on Reclamation’s

preliminary (i.e., draft) determination of

the Cities of Avenal, Coalinga, and

Huron, along with Broadview Water

District and West Stanislaus Irrigation

District, are invited at this time. A copy

of these Plans will be available for

review at Reclamation’s MP Regional

Office located in Sacramento, California,

and MP’s South-Central California Area

Office located in Fresno, California.

Dated: November 1, 2000.

Charles B. Johnson,

Acting Regional Resources Manager, MidPacific Region.

[FR Doc. 00–28769 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731–TA–706

(Review)]

Canned Pineapple Fruit From Thailand

AGENCY: United States International

Trade Commission.

ACTION: Scheduling of a full five-year

review concerning the antidumping

duty order on canned pineapple fruit

from Thailand.

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives

notice of the scheduling of a full review

pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5))

(the Act) to determine whether

revocation of the antidumping duty

order on canned pineapple fruit from

Thailand would be likely to lead to

continuation or recurrence of material

injury within a reasonably foreseeable

time. For further information

concerning the conduct of this review

and rules of general application, consult

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part

207).

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 1, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.J.

Na (202–708–4727), Office of

Investigations, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street SW.,

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain

information on this matter by contacting

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility

impairments who will need special

assistance in gaining access to the

Commission should contact the Office

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.

General information concerning the

Commission may also be obtained by

accessing its internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background.—On September 1, 2000,

the Commission determined that

responses to its notice of institution of

the subject five-year review were such

that a full review pursuant to section

751(c)(5) of the Act should proceed (65

FR 55047, September 12, 2000). A

record of the Commissioners’ votes, the

Commission’s statement on adequacy,

and any individual Commissioner’s

statements are available from the Office

of the Secretary and at the

Commission’s web site.

Participation in the review and public

service list.—Persons, including

industrial users of the subject

merchandise and, if the merchandise is

sold at the retail level, representative

consumer organizations, wishing to

participate in this review as parties

must file an entry of appearance with

the Secretary to the Commission, as

provided in section 201.11 of the

Commission’s rules, by 45 days after

publication of this notice. A party that

filed a notice of appearance following

publication of the Commission’s notice

of institution of the review need not file

an additional notice of appearance. The

Secretary will maintain a public service

list containing the names and addresses

of all persons, or their representatives,

who are parties to the review.

Limited disclosure of business

proprietary information (BPI) under an

administrative protective order (APO)

and BPI service list.—Pursuant to

section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s

rules, the Secretary will make BPI

gathered in this review available to

authorized applicants under the APO

issued in the review, provided that the

application is made by 45 days after

publication of this notice. Authorized

applicants must represent interested

parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C.

§ 1677(9), who are parties to the review.

A party granted access to BPI following

publication of the Commission’s notice

of institution of the review need not

reapply for such access. A separate

service list will be maintained by the

Secretary for those parties authorized to

receive BPI under the APO.

Staff report.—The prehearing staff

report in the review will be placed in

the nonpublic record on February 21,

2001, and a public version will be

issued thereafter, pursuant to section

207.64 of the Commission’s rules.

Hearing.—The Commission will hold

a hearing in connection with the review

beginning at 9:30 a.m. on March 13,

2001, at the U.S. International Trade

Commission Building. Requests to

appear at the hearing should be filed in

writing with the Secretary to the

Commission on or before March 5, 2001.

A nonparty who has testimony that may

aid the Commission’s deliberations may

request permission to present a short

statement at the hearing. All parties and

nonparties desiring to appear at the

hearing and make oral presentations

should attend a prehearing conference

to be held at 9:30 a.m. on March 8, 2001,

at the U.S. International Trade