alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**Certification of Chief  Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 OF the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Endocardial Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James W. Bullock, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ James W.  Bullock                                    |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | James W.  Bullock  Chief Executive Officer  May 14, 2003 |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toEndocardial Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Endocardial Solutions, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 1624 Lower Tribunal No. 2016

- CF

- 014093

- A

- O

_____________________________ C HRISTOPHER S. D EGALE , Appellant ,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Orange County

. Elaine A. Barbour , Judge.
June 18, 2024

PER CURIAM

. AFFIRMED

. WOZNIAK and BROWNLEE , JJ., and LAMBERT , B.D. , Associate Judge, c oncur.

Christopher S. Degale, Lowell , pro se

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach , for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Case 4:22-cr-00084-O Document 21 Filed 03/16/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 29
Case 4:22-cr-00084-O Document 21 Filed 03/16/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 30
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-18-00265-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 323rd District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 323-104719-17

Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Pittman, JJ.

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

IN THE INTEREST OF A.S.-J., J.W., AND J.W., CHILDREN
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant R.W. (Mother) attempts to appeal the trial court’s final order

terminating her parental rights to her three children. Because Mother has failed to 

invoke this court’s jurisdiction, we dismiss her attempted appeal.

On February 6, 2018, the trial court signed a termination order, concluding that 

clear and convincing evidence showed that Mother had filed an unrevoked affidavit of 

relinquishment of her parental rights and that termination was in the children’s best 

interest. On August 23, 2018—more than six months after the termination order—

Mother filed a letter in the trial court stating that she wanted to “withdraw” her 

affidavit signature and “appeal the de[c]ision.” We notified Mother that her notice of 

appeal was untimely and asked her, or any other affected party, to respond and show 

grounds to continue the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b), 42.3(a), 44.3. Mother 

responded that she had been “confused on trial dates,” but failed to proffer any legal 

ground upon which we could base our jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b) 

(requiring notice of appeal to be filed twenty days after judgment or order signed in 

accelerated appeal), 28.4(a) (classifying termination appeals as accelerated); In re 

K.A.F., 160 S.W.3d 923, 924, 928 (Tex. 2005) (affirming jurisdictional dismissal of 

appeal from order in termination suit because notice of appeal filed more than twenty 

days after judgment signed); In re D.A., No. 02-15-00346-CV, 2015 WL 9244637, 

at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Dec. 17, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing 

attempted appeal from final order in termination suit “[b]ecause Appellant’s notice of 
3

appeal was untimely and was filed after the expiration of the [fifteen-day] period for 

requesting an extension”).

Mother’s notice of appeal, filed more than six months after the final judgment 

of termination was signed, was untimely; thus, we can do nothing more than dismiss 

her attempted appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Kilroy v. 

Kilroy, 137 S.W.3d 780, 783 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.).

/s/ Lee Gabriel

Lee Gabriel

Justice

Delivered: September 20, 2018
Case 2:22-cr-00049-Z-BR Document 46 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 101
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the Wells FargoCommercial Mortgage Trust 2015-C28 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to

this report, exceptas otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC,as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as ServicingFunction Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation, as Primary Servicer for the Commerce Point I & II MortgageLoan, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, asSpecial Servicer for the Commerce Point I & II Mortgage Loan, Deutsche BankTrust Company Americas, as Trustee for the Commerce Point I & II MortgageLoan, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator for the Commerce Point I& II Mortgage Loan, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Custodian forthe Commerce Point I & II Mortgage Loan, and Situs Holdings, LLC, asOperating Advisor for the Commerce Point I & II Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 19, 2018

 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Opinion issued June 10 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 14
- 00403
- C V

——————————— FELICIA NICOLE JONES , Appellant

V. LOUIS VUITTON HOUSTON GALLERIA, ET AL , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 412th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 75486
- CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellee, Mercedes Benz of Houston Greenway , filed a motion seeking the dismiss al of Appellant Felicia Jones’ ap peal for want of jurisdiction. On March 6, 2014, Mercedes Benz filed a Motion to Dismiss in trial court pursuant to Rule 91(a). See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 91( a ). The Brazoria County Court held2

a hearing on the motion and granted an interlocutory judgment dismissing appellant’s claims against Mercedes Benz. Appellant brings this appeal from the interlocutory judgment dismissing claims against Mercedes Benz. The original trial court suit is still pending against other named parties. Texas appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review fi nal judgments, and interlocutory orders are only appealable if specified by statute. See Bison Bldg. Materials, Ltd. v. Aldridge , 422 S.W.3d 582, 585 (Tex. 2012); Stary v. DeBord , 967 S.W.2d 352, 352

- 353 (Tex. 1998). An order that disposes of claims agai nst one or some of the defendants in a suit does not render a judgment final. See Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W. 3d 191, 205 (Tex. 2001). The order appealed from here is not a final judgment because the suit is still pending in Brazoria County and only Mercedes Benz has been dismissed as defendant. The appellant has failed to point to any statutory authority that would allow for an interlocutory appeal. W e dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3( a )

. We dismiss all p ending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown

.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 126 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 126

 To designate the weeks of April 25 through May 2, 1993, and April 10 
             through 17, 1994, as ``Jewish Heritage Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 1993

Mr. Gilman (for himself and Mr. Nadler) introduced the following joint 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and 
                             Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To designate the weeks of April 25 through May 2, 1993, and April 10 
             through 17, 1994, as ``Jewish Heritage Week''.

Whereas April 26, 1993 and April 14, 1994 mark the forty-fifth and forty-sixth 
        anniversaries of the founding of the State of Israel;
Whereas the months of April and May contain events of major significance in the 
        Jewish calendar, including Passover, the fiftieth anniversary of the 
        Warsaw Ghetto Uprising and the opening of the Holocaust Memorial Museum 
        in 1993 in Washington, DC., Holocaust Memorial Day and Jerusalem Day;
Whereas the Congress recognizes that an understanding of the heritage of all 
        ethnic groups in the Nation contributes to the unity of this Nation and,
Whereas understanding among ethnic groups in this Nation may be advanced further 
        through an appreciation of the culture, history and traditions of the 
        Jewish community and the contributions of the Jewish people to this 
        Nation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, the weeks of April 25 
through May 2, 1993, and April 10 through 17, 1994, are designated as 
``Jewish Heritage Week'', and the President is authorized and requested 
to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States, 
departments and agencies of State and local governments, and interested 
organizations to observe such week with appropriate ceremonies, 
activities, and programs.

                                 <all>
```
#### HENRY v. STATE.

No. 25203.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 28, 1951.

Rehearing Denied April 11, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Failure to stop and render aid is the offensé; the punishment, a fine of $500 and confinement in jail for six months.

The record before us contains neither bills of exception nor a statement of facts. Nothing is presented for the consideration of this court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.03

                             [PROFUTURES LETTERHEAD]


                                August 31, 2000

VIA OVERNIGHT COURIER

Charles Mizrahi, President
Hampton Investors, Inc.
2519 Avenue U
Brooklyn, New York 11229

RE: HAMPTON INVESTORS INC. FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED
    ADVISORY CONTRACT WITH PROFUTURES LONG/SHORT GROWTH FUND, L.P. (THE "FUND")

Dear Charles:

This letter will confirm that the August 31, 1998 First Amended and Restated
Advisory Contract between you and the Fund is hereby renewed until August 31,
2001.

Yours very truly,


PROFUTURES LONG/SHORT GROWTH FUND, L.P.
By: ProFutures, Inc., its General Partner


By: /s/ GARY D. HALBERT
    --------------------------
    Gary D. Halbert, President
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000686

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

STATE OF HAWAII, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

HARVEY K. KELIIKOA, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

HILO DIVISION

(CASE NO. 3DTC-20-021730)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Chan, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that:

(1) On January 18, 2023, the court extended the opening

brief deadline to March 31, 2023; 

(2) Self-represented Defendant-Appellant Harvey

Keliikoa (Keliikoa) failed to file the opening brief or request a

further extension of time; 

(3) On April 5, 2023, the appellate clerk entered a

default notice informing Keliikoa that the time for filing the 

opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the

court's attention on April 17, 2023, for appropriate action,

which could include dismissal of the appeal, under Hawai i Rules

of Appellate Procedure Rule 30, and Keliikoa could request relief

from default by motion; 

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-22-0000686

30-MAY-2023

08:04 AM

Dkt. 63 ODSD
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(4) The appellate clerk mailed the default notice to

Keliikoa at his address on record; and

(5) Keliikoa took no further action in this appeal.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, May 30, 2023.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

Associate Judge

2
Case 4:22-cr-00161-Y Document 18 Filed 06/15/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 19
Case 4:22-cr-00161-Y Document 18 Filed 06/15/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 20
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 88 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 88

Recognizing and commending American airmen held as prisoners of war at 
    the Buchenwald concentration camp during World War II for their 
                    service, bravery, and fortitude.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 1993

Mr. Montgomery submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing and commending American airmen held as prisoners of war at 
    the Buchenwald concentration camp during World War II for their 
                    service, bravery, and fortitude.

Whereas, during World War II, 173 Allied airmen were captured by the enemy and 
        held as prisoners of war at the Buchenwald concentration camp in Weimar, 
        Germany;
Whereas the captured airmen included 81 Americans, 27 Canadians, and 65 Britons, 
        Australians, and New Zealanders;
Whereas the facts and circumstances of their confinement are amply documented in 
        the official records maintained by the National Archives and Records 
        Administration;
Whereas a report from the International Red Cross concerning Stalag Luft III in 
        Sagan, Germany, mentioned 6 American airmen held at Buchenwald, 
        including 1 whose name does not appear on the lists maintained by the 
        National Archives;
Whereas, since the liberation of Buchenwald in 1945, numerous personal memoirs, 
        scholarly books, and articles have been published describing the 
        conditions at the concentration camp;
Whereas this extensive documentation records the extraordinarily inhuman 
        treatment, deprivations, and personal suffering inflicted on prisoners 
        of war and other inmates at Buchenwald; and
Whereas Allied Governments and veterans organizations outside the United States 
        have granted special recognition to their citizens and members who were 
        held as prisoners of war in World War II concentration camps: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) recognizes and commends the valiant American airmen 
        held as prisoners of war at the Buchenwald concentration camp 
        during World War II for their faithful service, personal 
        bravery, and exceptional fortitude; and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        recognizing and commending the service, bravery, and fortitude 
        of the American airmen.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ESI AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,505,359
<SECURITIES>                                 7,057,071
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,237,168
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,519,809
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,334,734
<PP&E>                                       5,017,359
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,202,357)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,262,276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,918,645
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       101,735
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,832,397
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,262,276
<SALES>                                      6,540,328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,540,328
<CGS>                                        4,838,741
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,838,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,970,997
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             271,512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,190,200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,190,200)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.98)


</TABLE>
民权及平等就业机会办公室 

• 要提出项目歧视投诉,请将其发送至:Director, Office of Civil Rights and 

Equal Employment Opportunity, 1500 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 

20220。

• 根据《康复法》第 504 条提出的合理便利请求应提交至我们的在线反馈

表。

• 有关民权和多元化平等就业机会的更多信息。

联络信息

要联系在华盛顿特区的 TEOAF 或对 TEOAF 进行一般查询,请使用我们的在线一

般反馈表或致电 202-622-9600。
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         596,907
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,871,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                   152,474
<INVENTORY>                                 14,349,451
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,824,339
<PP&E>                                       2,787,807
<DEPRECIATION>                                 504,014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,843,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,545,184
<BONDS>                                      7,885,696
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 20,925,000
<COMMON>                                         2,384
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,484,760
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,843,024
<SALES>                                     24,280,638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,321,357
<CGS>                                       11,587,872
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,587,872
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,854,604
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             836,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,438
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,038
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,038
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DENNIS W. HALLEMA,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND

IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al.

Defendants.

Case No. 3:22-cv-00896-M

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(i)

Since the filing of this lawsuit, Defendants have finally adjudicated the long-pending

application of the Plaintiff Dennis W. Hallema. As such, the present lawsuit is now moot.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff Dennis W. Hallema hereby

voluntarily dismisses the instant action with prejudice. Each side to bear their own fees and

costs.

/s/ James O. Hacking, III

James O. Hacking, III, MO Bar # 46728

Hacking Immigration Law, LLC

10900 Manchester Rd., Suite 203

St. Louis, MO 63122

Phone: 314.961-8200

Fax: 314.961.8201

Email: jim@hackingimmigrationlaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 3:22-cv-00896-M Document 10 Filed 08/01/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 53
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 1, 2022, the foregoing Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was

filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court to be served by operation of the Court’s electronic

filing system.

/s/ James. O. Hacking, III

James O. Hacking, III, MO Bar # 46728

Hacking Immigration Law, LLC

Case 3:22-cv-00896-M Document 10 Filed 08/01/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 54