alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months ended September 30,
1999 and the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         567,017
<SECURITIES>                                 1,143,786
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,134
<INVENTORY>                                      2,136
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,830,459
<PP&E>                                         967,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                 176,935
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,299,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          340,947
<BONDS>                                      2,402,841
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    368,838
<COMMON>                                           651
<OTHER-SE>                                     118,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,299,455
<SALES>                                        369,268
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               369,268
<CGS>                                          259,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  259,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               218,146
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,620
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             120,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (198,488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (750)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (197,738)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (197,738)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.48)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted), Wayne Wetherell Chief Financial Officer of ImageWare Systems, Inc.(the ***“Company”***),hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.               The Company’squarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the ***“Report”***) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition of the Company at the end of the periods covered by theReport and the results of operations of the Company for the periods covered bythe Report.

Dated:  November 20, 2006
| /s/  Wayne Wetherell                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Wayne Wetherell   Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to ImageWare Systems, Inc. and will befurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04734**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  04734\04734_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 04734\04734_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04734\04734_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04734\04734_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04734\04734_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04734\04734_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

04734\04734_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 04734\1st_review_email_response.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 04734\Follow-up and Resubmittals\04734 D3-1 Pond-1 01-13-11_resubmit.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 04734\Follow-up and Resubmittals\04734 D3-1 Pond-2 01-13-11_resubmit.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 04734\Follow-up and Resubmittals\04734 Part C 01-13-11_resubmit.xls Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 04734\Follow-up and Resubmittals\Meredosia_Power_Station_04734.doc Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 04734\Follow-up and Resubmittals\Meredosia_Power_Station_04734response to 2011jan11 followups - 2011jan18.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 04734\Supporting Documents\04734 A5-2 Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04734\Supporting Documents\04734 A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04734\Supporting Documents\04734 D3-1 Pond-1 01-13-11.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04734\Supporting Documents\04734 D3-1 Pond-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04734\Supporting Documents\04734 D3-1 Pond-2 01-13-11.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04734\Supporting Documents\04734 D3-1 Pond-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04734\Supporting Documents\04734 I2-7 2009 Form 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 04734\Supporting Documents\04734 Submittal Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04734\Supporting Documents\Meredosia_Power_Station_04734response to 2011jan11 followups .pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04734\04734_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04734\04734_ Completenes Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 04734\Supporting Documents\04734_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History:                                                
|                                                             
|U.S. Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Tanker (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                             
|                                                             
|U.S. Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Tanker (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           | 1,578,442 | 1,236,796 | 1,134,681 | 1,309,749 | 1,123,557 | 1,643,976 | 1,761,455 | 1,911,256 | 1,996,428
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,974,204 | 1,994,044 | 2,031,178 | 2,105,785 | 2,065,760 | NA        | 2,296,816 | NA        | 2,546,683 | 2,466,070
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,339,896 | 2,440,271 | 2,437,604 | 2,593,782 | 2,693,914 | 2,671,614 | 2,585,384 | 2,566,730 | 2,449,724 | 2,353,823
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,359,661 | 2,299,313 | 2,092,381 | 1,940,418 | 1,827,806 | 1,760,399 | 1,759,116 | 1,730,324 | 1,671,786 | 1,281,094
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,016,231 | 991,793   | 1,092,742 | 1,115,490 |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-208911 on Form S-8 of our reports dated May 1, 2017 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Ferroglobe PLC and the effectiveness of Ferroglobe PLC’s internal control over financial reporting (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting because of  material weaknesses), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Ferroglobe PLC for the year ended December 31, 2016.

/s/ Deloitte, S.L.

Madrid, Spain
 May 1, 2017
__________________________________________________________________________ 

Notice of Appeal 

Page 1 of 2 

NO. DC-13-08688 

MIKE ARMSTRONG § IN THE 101ST 

 § 

VS. § DISTRICT COURT OF 

 § 

JAMES M. SUGGS, JR. AND § 

SUGGS LAW FIRM, P.C. § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: 

 COMES NOW, MIKE ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff/Appellant, and hereby 

gives notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals, Fifth District of Texas, Dallas, 

Texas from the Final Summary Judgment of this Court, signed on December 

15, 2014. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ John D. Nation

 John D. Nation 

 State Bar No. 14819700 

 4925 Greenville, Suite 200 

 Dallas, Texas 75206 

 214-800-5160 

 214-800-5161 (facsimile) 

 nationlawfirm@gmail.com

 Attorney for Appellant 

Shelia Bradley

FILED

DALLAS COUNTY

1/14/2015 5:05:28 PM

FELICIA PITRE

DISTRICT CLERK

05-15-00070-CV

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 1/16/2015 4:14:32 PM LISA MATZ Clerk
__________________________________________________________________________

Notice of Appeal

Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true copy of this notice of appeal was served on 

James M. Suggs, Attorney at Law, 800 West Airport Freeway, Suite 600, Irving, 

Texas 75062, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, on this 14th day of January 

2015.

/s/ John D. Nation

John D. Nation
ORDER Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ROBERT HOPKINS, III, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-00706-E

§

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

This case was originally before United States District Court Senior Judge Sam R. 

Cummings. On June 2, 2023, this case was reassigned to United States District Court Senior Judge 

Sidney A Fitzwater pursuant to Special Order 3-348. (Doc. 19). On June 6, 2023, this case then 

reassigned to United States District Court Judge Ada E. Brown pursuant to Special Order 3-249. 

(Doc. 21).

Before the Court are the following motions: (1) Plaintiff Robert Hopkins, III’s (“Plaintiff”) 

Motion for Status Conference, (Doc. 13); (2) Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Scheduling Order (the 

“Motion to Stay”), (Doc. 15); (3) Defendant United States Department of Defense’s (“Defendant”) 

Cross-Motion to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order (the “Motion to Amend/Correct”), (Doc. 17); 

(4) the Parties’ Joint Motion to Expedite Decision Concerning Scheduling Motions (the “Original 

Motion to Expedite”), (Doc. 22); and (5) the Parties’ Amended Joint Renewed Motion to Expedite 

Decision Concerning Scheduling Motions (the “Renewed Motion to Expedite”), (Doc. 23). The 

Court rules on these motions as follows:

1. The Parties’ Renewed Motion to Expedite, (Doc. 23), is GRANTED;

2. The Parties’ Original Motion to Expedite, (Doc. 22), is MOOT;

Case 3:22-cv-00706-E Document 24 Filed 06/13/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 445
ORDER Page 2 of 2

3. Defendant’s Motion to Amend/Correct, (Doc. 17), is GRANTED;

4. Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay, (Doc. 15), is MOOT; and 

5. Plaintiff’s Motion for Status Conference, (Doc. 13) is DENIED

Defendant shall file its motion for summary judgment with an accompanying ex parte, in 

camera affidavit no later than August 11, 2023, at 5:00, pm. All other deadlines in Senior Judge 

Cumming’s Scheduling Order, (Doc. 12), are hereby STAYED pending the Court’s adjudication 

of Defendant’s forthcoming motion for summary judgment. 

SO ORDERED: June 13, 2023. 

Case 3:22-cv-00706-E Document 24 Filed 06/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 446
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 292 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.292
                                         Agreed to October 7, 1994      

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That a collection of statements made in tribute to the late Speaker of 
the House of Representatives, Thomas P. ``Tip'' O'Neill, Jr., together 
with related materials, shall be printed as a House document, with 
illustrations and suitable binding. The document shall be prepared 
under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing.
    Sec. 2. In addition to the usual number, there shall be printed the 
lesser of--
        (1) 5,000 casebound copies of the document, of which 1,760 
    copies shall be for the use of the House of Representatives, 400 
    copies shall be for the use of the Senate, and 2,840 copies shall 
    be for the use of the Joint Committee on Printing; or
        (2) such number of casebound copies of the document as does not 
    exceed a total production and printing cost of $79,500, with 
    distribution to be allocated in the same proportion as described in 
    paragraph (1).
Attest:







                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:







                                               Secretary of the Senate.`
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          45,982
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,299
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,811
<PP&E>                                           3,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 203,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,092
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              101
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   203,840
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,035
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (61)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,227
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,504
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,723
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,723
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JOEL NOONKESTER, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00223-O

 § 

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT §

HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., § 

§ 

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation

(ECF No. 84) on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (ECF No. 73). No 

objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for review. The District 

Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding 

none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate 

Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 73) is DENIED.

SO ORDERED on this 13th day of September, 2023. 

 ________________________________ 

 Reed O’Connor

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00223-O Document 86 Filed 09/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1392
Case 3:22-cr-00163-E Document 32 Filed 12/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 80
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220 

FOIA No.: 2012-08-218 JUN 2 1 2013 

OASIS No.: NK-636327 

Mr. Richard Lardner 

Associated Press 

1100 13 th Street 

Suite 700 

Washington, DC 20005 

Re: North Korean Applications 

Dear Mr. Lardner: 

This is our final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, request 

dated August 24,.2012 to the Department of the Treasury (Treasury). You requested a copy of 

the first 5 pages of each application for license to do business with North Korea. Treasury 

referred this matter to its Office of Foreign assets Control (OF AC) for processing. 

Please be aware that OF AC is experiencing a substantial backlog of FOIA requests that has 

adversely affected its response time. 

OFAC's search for documents responsive to your request produced a total of74 pages. We have 

determined that 67 pages are releasable in part with redactions made pursuant to FOIA 

exemptions (b)( 4), (b)( 6), and (b )(7)(C); seven pages are releasable in their entirety. 

Please note that OF AC has received a number of similar requests, all pertaining to businessrelated transactions in North Korea. We are releasing the same package of responsive 

documents to each requester in an effort to respond more efficiently to all. For this reason, you 

may find that you are receiving a broader range of records than you originally anticipated. 

You may appeal our final decision, in writing, within 35 days after the date of this letter to the 

Freedom oflnformation Act Appeal, Disclosure Services (DO), Department of the Treasury, 

Washington, DC 20220. The deciding official for OFAC appeals is the Director, Office of 

Foreign Assets Control. Please include with your letter of appeal a copy of this response letter. 

Please reference FOIA case number 2012-08-218 in all future correspondence. 

Copies of the FOIA and Treasury regulations are available at www.treasury.gov/foia. 

Provisions of the FOIA allow us to recover part of the cost of complying with your request. In 

this instance, no fees have been assessed. 
Mr. Richard Lardner 

Page 2 

The Office of Oovernment Infonnation Services (OOIS) also mediates disputes between FOIA 

requesters and Federal agencies as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. If you are requesting 

access to your own records (which is considered a Privacy Act request), you should know that 

OOIS does not have the authority to handle requests made under the Privacy Act of 1974. 

If you wish to contact OOIS, you may email them at ogis@nara.gov or call 877-684-6448. 

Enclosed are information sheets pertaining to the FOIA exemptions and your right to an 

administrative appeal. 

Your request has been assigned FOIA No. 2012-08-218. Please reference this number in any 

future correspondence. You may contact our FOIA Requester Service Center at (202) 622-2500, 

0ption 3. 

~y, 

/' 

Marshall H. ields, Jr. 

Assistant Director, Information Disclosure 

Office of Resource Management 

Office of Foreign Assets Control 

Enclosures: 

1. Responsive Records (74) pages 

2. FOIA Exemptions Sheet 

3. Administrative Appeal Rights'
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 24, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-11-00879-CV

____________

JOEY MORALES, Appellant

V.

GEOPHYSICAL EXPLORER, LTD., GREG BRANNON AND GLOBAL 

GEOPHYSICAL SERVICES, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-52365

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed August 5, 2011. The notice of appeal was 

filed on October 5, 2011. To date, our records show that appellant has neither established 

indigence nor paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring 

payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements 

for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the 

Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict 
2

Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in court of 

appeals); Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same). 

On December 15, 2011, this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate filing fee 

on or before December 30, 2011, or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has not 

paid the appellate filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to 

comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Christopher.