alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.20

                               PROMISSORY NOTE

$71,500                                                       San Francisco, CA

                                                             September 22, 1999

          FOR VALUE RECEIVED, CHAITAN KHOSLA promises to pay Kosan
Biosciences Incorporated (the "Company"), or order, the principal sum of
seventy-one thousand, five hundred ($71,500), together with interest on the
unpaid principal hereof from the date hereof at the rate of five and 89/100
percent (5.89%) per annum, compounded semiannually.

          Principal and interest shall be due and payable on September 22,
2002. Should the undersigned fail to make full payment of principal or
interest for a period of 10 days or more after the due date thereof, the
whole unpaid balance on this Note of principal and interest shall become
immediately due at the option of the holder of this Note. Payment of
principal and interest shall be made in lawful money of the United States of
America.

          The undersigned may at any time prepay all or any portion of the
principal or interest owing hereunder.

          This Note is subject to the terms of the Option, dated as of
October 23, 1998. This Note is secured in part by a pledge of the Company's
Common Stock under the terms of a Security Agreement of even date herewith
and is subject to all the provisions thereof.

          The holder of this Note shall have full recourse against the
undersigned, and shall not be required to proceed against the collateral
securing this Note in the event of default.

          In the event the undersigned shall cease to be an employee or
consultant of the Company for any reason, this Note shall, at the option of
the Company, be accelerated, and the whole unpaid balance on this Note of
principal and accrued interest shall be immediately due and payable.

          Should any action be instituted for the collection of this Note,
the reasonable costs and attorneys' fees therein of the holder shall be paid
by the undersigned.


                                       /s/ Chaitan Khosla
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Signature


                                           CHAITAN KHOSLA
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Print Name
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         8016054
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          773000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     288312
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        13995351
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          13748002
<LOANS>                                       36333023
<ALLOWANCE>                                      50050
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                61143816
<DEPOSITS>                                    47767023
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             891237
<LONG-TERM>                                    1000000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          8863
<OTHER-SE>                                    11476693
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                61143816
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                1309880
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               363742
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                313700
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               1987322
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              999057
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1037878
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           949444
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     6263
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 813274
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 320289
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      200233
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    200233
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.32
<LOANS-NON>                                       7668
<LOANS-PAST>                                     68285
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 43787
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                50050
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             50050
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 21, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00263

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF X.E.R., A CHILD

,

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PA02538 Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant has f

iled a motion requesting access to the sealed clerk’s record and an

extens ion of time to file his brief. Appellant’s request to access the sealed record is GRANTED

. Appellant’s attorney may appear and review the sealed record at the c ourt. Appellant’s brief is due twenty days from the date of this order. All parties and their attorneys are ORDERED not to share the contents of the sealed record with any person except to the extent necessary to prepare their respective briefs. In the event appellant or appellee reference the sealed record in their respective briefs, they are ORDERED to (1) file their respective briefs in paper form only, (2) with a cover letter informing the Clerk of this court that the brief references the sealed record.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9.2(c)(3) (exception to electronic filing for documents under seal).

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of June, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
~ ,o II· 1 .J • <. U U:.; I I C. 0 I"' 1"1 U T T ICe 0 T ::>en ::> U 5 an L 0 lll n 5 i. U L · L L tl· U 4 / 0 

DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE, VETERANS AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 

Maine Military Authority, RS-Maintenance 

Office ofthe Bxeoutlve Director 

Honorable .Raymond LaHood 

U.S. Department ofTt'allsportatian 

1200 New Jersey Avej SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

8 Mulliken Court 

Augusta, Maine 04330 

December 5, 2011 

1 ftlll the Exeeutive Director of the Maine Military Authority (.1-I!MA), an inst1'llnlentality of 

the· State of Maine, which historically employs between 250 and 500 employees at any given 

time. Since 1997, MMA has refurbished mol'e than 14,000 High Mobility Multi Wheel Vehicles 

(HMMWV)~ Five Ton Trucks, and a wide variety of engineer vehicles for the National Guard 

Bureau and the United States Army. In addition, MMA has executed dozens of oontraots for 

other gover.w:nent contractors and customers. MMA,s cornerstones of quality, timeliness and 

cost efficiency has saved U.S. taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars. 

As a result of om· production capabilities, MMA receives at least 2 .. 3 groups of vendors~ 

contractors, end customers each month. Our visitors typically travel from mf\ior cities and have 

limited time and flight choices into Ntv1RA. Cummtly. a one-day visit to our facility requires our 

guests to budget two additional daya for travel. Reducing tha current airoraft standard of 15 seats 

to 8 seats would likely add 1-2 travel ·days to our facility and negatively impact out visitors 

ability to travel (arrive and depart) together as .a group. The only other alternative airport is 

Bangor Intematlonal Airport which is more than three and a half hours from our facility. 

Reducing aircraft seating will dramatically impair MMA's ability to attract new customers 

and. support our current customers. Given our location we rely heavily on NMRA as our primary 

aviation facility. Our industry b incredibly competitive and in these economic times a 15 seat 

aircraft is critical to our ability to sustain and grow our W01'kload. 

2/6
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000479 15-JUN-2020 07:48 AM
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 144

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide

for issuance of writs of election in cases of vacancies in the Senate.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1993

Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut introduced the following joint resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to provide for issuance of writs of election in

cases of vacancies in the Senate.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow4 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu5 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

6 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

7 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with-
2

•HJ 144 IH

1 in seven years after the date of its submission for ratifica2 tion:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE —

4 ‘‘When vacancies happen in the representation of any

5 State in the Senate, the executive authority thereof shall

6 issue writs of election to fill such vacancies. Any writ

7 under this article shall be issued not later than 90 days

8 after the date on which the vacancy involved occurs.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1
                                AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                     TO THE
                             FIRST DATA CORPORATION
                       1993 DIRECTOR'S STOCK OPTION PLAN

     WHEREAS, the shareholders of First Data Corporation (the "Corporation")
adopted and  established the First Data Corporation 1993 Director's Stock Option
Plan (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, Section 9 of the Plan authorizes the Board of Directors of the
Corporation (the "Board") to amend the Plan.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Board hereby amends the Plan effective May 10, 2000 to
read  as follows.

1.   Section 5(d)(iii)(B), Nonqualified Stock Options, shall be amended to read
as follows::

               (B) if a Non-Employee Director to whom a NQO has been granted
     shall die holding a NQO that has not expired and has not been fully
     exercised, his executors, administrators, heirs or distributees, as the
     case may be, may, at any time within one year after the date of such death
     (but in no event after the NQO has expired under the provisions of
     Subparagraph 5(d)(i) above), exercise the NQO with respect to any shares of
     common stock as to which the decedent could have exercised the NQO at the
     time of his death or which become exercisable within one year after his
     death, provided that for any NQO granted to a Non-Employee Director whose
     death occurs prior to May 1, 2000, such exercise shall apply to the total
     number of shares covered by the NQO grant; or

2.   Section 6(f)(ii), Purchased Stock Options, shall be amended to read as
     follows:

               (ii) if a Non-Employee Director to whom a PSO has been granted
     shall die holding a PSO that has not expired and has not been fully
     exercised, his executors, administrators, heirs or distributees, as the
     case may be, may, at any time within one year after the date of such death
     (but in no event after the PSO has expired under the provisions of
     Subparagraph 6(e) above), exercise the PSO with respect to any shares of
     common stock as to which the decedent could have exercised the PSO at the
     time of his death or which become exercisable within one year after his
     death, provided that for any PSOs granted to a Non-Employee Director whose
     death occurs prior to May 1, 2000, such exercise shall apply to the total
     number of shares covered by the PSO; and

3.   Except as otherwise specifically provided, this Amendment will be effective
     May 10, 2000.

4.   Any inconsistent provision of the Plan shall be read consistent with this
     Amendment.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been adopted by resolution of the
First Data Corporation Board of Directors at its meeting on May 10, 2000.


                               By:  /s/  Michael T. Whealy
                                   ------------------------
                                   Michael T. Whealy, Secretary

                                      25
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 906**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Fritsch, President and Chief Executive Officer of Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the Operating Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ EDWARDJ.FRITSCH                                                           |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward J. FritschPresident and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner |   |
| August 14, 2007                                                     |   |
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 299

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the book entitled ‘‘Hispanic Americans

3 in Congress’’, prepared under the direction of the Joint

4 Committee on Printing, shall be printed as a House docu5 ment, with illustrations and suitable binding.

6 SEC. 2. In addition to the usual number, there shall

7 be printed, for the use of the Joint Committee on Printing,

8 the lesser of—

9 (1) 25,000 copies of the document; or

10 (2) such number of copies of the document as

11 does not exceed a total production and printing cost

12 of $110,000.

Passed the House of Representatives October 7 (legislative day, October 6), 1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 299

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the printing of the book entitled

‘‘Hispanic Americans in Congress’’.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1972

CALVIN J. WEBER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES ARMY PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCE FACILITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-99-

439-AMD)

Submitted: September 9, 1999 Decided: September 14, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin J. Weber, Appellant Pro Se. Nadira Clarke, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

May 20, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered

on the docket sheet on May 21, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and

79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that

the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Weber appeals the district court’s order granting Appellee’s motion to dismiss and alternative summary judgment motion

because Weber’s suit was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Weber v. United States Army Personnel

Sec. Clearance Facility, No. CA-99-439-AMD (D. Md. May 21, 1999).*

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*National Radio Distributors Corporation, Edwin Blumenthal, Herbert Schneur and Stanley Seltzer, Defendants.

County Court, Bronx County,

November 8, 1957.

*Daniel V. Sullivan, District Attorney (Albert Blinder*of counsel), for plaintiff.

*Myron J. Greene*for defendants.

Samuel J. Joseph, J.

These defendants are charged with the commission of crimes involving counts for conspiracy, using false marks as to manufacture, defacing or removing identification marks, offending against trade-marks.

An inspection of the Grand Jury minutes is sought. It is urged that the indictment be set aside on the ground:

A. That the acts charged against the said defendants are not embraced within the pertinent sections of the Penal Law;

B. That there is insufficient proof to establish, prima facie, any of the crimes set forth in the indictment;

0. That the indictment and each count thereof is founded on the testimony of accomplices uncorroborated by other evidence as required by section 399 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Tersely, the indictment charges that the defendant corporation and its officers, the defendants Blumenthal and Schneur, as having been engaged in the television and radio business of dealing in tubes, parts and sets. They allegedly acted in concert with the defendant Seltzer and conspired with one Milton Grudin to rebrand and stamp counterfeit false numbers and trade-marks on used and rejected radio and television tubes, so as to make it appear that such tubes were the manufactured *46product of the Radio Corporation of America, and that the manufacturer’s warranty, on the said tubes, was still in full force and effect.

The court holds that the acts alleged in the indictment are within the ambit of the statutes defining conspiracy (Penal Law, § 580, subds. 1, 4, 6), using false marks as to manufacture (Penal Law, § 436), defacing or removing identification marks (Penal Law, § 436-a, subds. 3, 4), and offenses against trademarks (Penal Law, § 2354, subd. 2).

After having read the several volumes comprising the Grand Jury minutes, the court further finds that the testimony of the witnesses before the Grand Jury warrants a denial of the motion on the grounds urged under paragraphs B and C above.

The motion is denied, in all respects.
CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Christian Lown, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all
          reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Navient Student Loan Trust 2015-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic
          reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
          respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,
          servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
          statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration
          agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with
          servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation
          AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
          Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee.
 
 [Signature Page Follows]
 
 
 Date:  March 29, 2019/s/ CHRISTIAN LOWNChristian LownPresident and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)Navient Funding, LLC
# Official Journal C 34A/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 34A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5016 February 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 34A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5016 February 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 034A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — first supplement to the 25th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 034A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — first supplement to the 25th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN