alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 15, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 68895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29103]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD07-00-110]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Cortez Bridge (SR 64), 
Bradenton, Manatee County, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District, has approved a 
temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the 
Cortez Drawbridge (SR 64) across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 
87.4, Bradenton, Manatee County, Florida. This deviation allows the 
drawbridge owner to provide single leaf openings for vessel traffic. 
This temporary deviation is required November 27, 2000 from 8 a.m. 
until 4 p.m., to allow the bridge owner to safely complete maintenance 
to the drawbridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective on November 27, 2000 from 8 a.m. 
until 4 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Barry Dragon, Chief, Operations 
Section, Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge Section at (305) 415-
6743.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Cortez Drawbridge (SR 64) across the 
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Sarasota, FL has a vertical clearance of 
25 feet above mean high water (MHW) measured at the center in the 
closed position. On October 30, 2000 the owner, requested a deviation 
from the current operating regulation in 33 CFR 117.35 which requires 
the drawbridge to open promptly and fully when a request to open is 
given. This temporary deviation was requested to allow necessary 
maintenance to the drawbridge in a critical time sensitive manner.
    The District Commander has granted a temporary deviation from the 
operating requirements listed in 33 CFR 117.35 for the purpose of 
maintenance of the drawbridge. Under this deviation, the Cortez 
Drawbridge (SR 64) need only provide single leaf openings. The 
deviation is effective on November 27, 2000 from 8 a.m. until 4 p.m.

    Dated: November 7, 2000.
G.E. Shapley,
Chief, Bridge Administration, Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 00-29103 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2899]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Meeting

    Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
(CDC), announces the following meeting:

    Name: Guide to Community Preventive Services (GCPS) TaskForce 
Meeting.
    Times and Dates: 9 a.m.-5:30 p.m., February 9, 2000; 8 a.m.-3:30 
p.m., February 10, 2000.
    Place: The Renaissance Waverly Hotel, 2450 Galleria Parkway, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30339, telephone (770) 953-4500.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
The meeting room accommodates approximately 40 people.
    Purpose: The mission of the Task Force is to develop and publish 
a Guide to Community Preventive Services, which is based on the best 
available scientific evidence and current expertise regarding 
essential public health services and what works in the delivery of 
those services.
    Matters to be Discussed: Agenda items include: a briefing of 
administrative activities in the Community Guide Branch, 
recommendation approvals for the Oral Health and Tobacco Chapters, 
updates for the following chapters: Diabetes, Cancer, Motor Vehicle 
Occupant Injuries, Mental Health, Physical Activity, Nutrition, 
Sexual Behavioral, Alcohol, Violence Prevention and Sociocultural 
Environment, an update on the Economic Evaluation and a discussion 
of actions items for the next quarter.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for Additional Information: Stephanie Zaza, M.D., 
M.P.H., Chief, CPS Guide Development Activity, Division of 
Prevention Research and Analytic Methods, Epidemiology Program 
Office, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, M/S K-73, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, 
telephone 770/488-8189.
    Persons interested in reserving a space for this meeting should 
call 770/488-8189 by close of business on February 7, 2000.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services office has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for ToxicSubstances and Disease Registry.

Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 00-2899 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION

ROBERT (BOB) ROSS, § 

 § 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, § 

 § 

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-CV-00343-Y 

 § 

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL § 

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, § 

MCGAUGHEY, REBER AND § 

ASSOCIATES, INC., JULIE § 

HEDRICK, AND ERIK HARRIS, § 

 §

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. § 

AGREED MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL AS COUNSEL

TO THE U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE AND MAGISTRATE JUDGE:

Heather Abreu, co-counsel for Plaintff/Counter-Defendant files this Unopposed Motion 

for Withdrawal as an attorney and would show unto the Court as follows:

I. BACKGROUND

1. Heather Abreu is currently co-counsel of record on the above captioned matter.

2. Heather Abreu requests approval to withdraw as an attorney-of-record for said

Plaintiff. Counsel Kerri Phillips will remain as the attorney in charge of the matter and 

there will not be any delay in the matter due to counsel’s withdrawal.

3. The Plaintiffs are not opposed to Heather Abreu’s withdrawal of this matter.

4. Heather Abreu has sought concurrence from opposing counsel in this matter and they are 

not opposed to this motion.
2 

II. PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Heather Abreu respectfully prays that

the Court grant Agreed Motion for Withdrawal as attorney for Plaintiff, and for any such other 

and further relief, general or special, at law or in equity, to which she may show

herself to be justly entitled.

Dated: March 10, 2023

Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ Heather Abreu 

HEATHER ABREU* 

Texas Bar No. 24122577

KERRI PHILLIPS

Texas Bar No. 24065906

K.D. Phillips Law Firm, PLLC

6010 Spring Creek Parkway

Plano, Texas 75024 

Phone: (972) 327-5800 

Fax: (940) 400-0089 

Email: heather@KDphillipslaw.com 

Email: kerri@KDphillipslaw.com

Counsels for Plaintiff Robert (Bob) Ross
3 

AGREED TO FORM:

HEATHER ABREU* 

Texas Bar No. 24122577

K.D. Phillips Law Firm, PLLC

6010 Spring Creek Parkway

Plano, Texas 75024

Phone: (972) 327-5800 

Fax: (940) 400-0089 

Email: heather@KDphillipslaw.com

KERRI PHILLIPS

Texas Bar No. 24065906

K.D. Phillips Law Firm, PLLC

6010 Spring Creek Parkway

Plano, Texas 75024

Phone: (972) 327-5800 

Fax: (940) 400-0089 

Email: kerri@KDphillipslaw.com 

Counsels for Plaintiff Robert (Bob) Ross

SANFORD R. DENISON

Tex. Bar No. 05655560

Baab & Denison, LLP

6301 Gaston Ave., Suite 550

Dallas, TX 75214

Tel.: (214) 637-0750 

Fax.: (214) 637-0730 

Email: denison@baabdenison.com 

WILLIAM W. OSBORNE*

D.C. Bar No. 912089

Osborne Law Offices P.C.

5335 Wisconsin Avenue N.W., Suite 440

Washington, D.C. 20015

Tel.: (202) 243-3200 

Fax: (202) 686-2977 

Email: b.osborne@osbornelaw.com

Counsels for Defendant Counterclaim Plaintiff Association of Professional Flight Attendants, 

and Defendants Julie Hedrick and Erik Harris

*Admitted Pro Hac Vice
4 

MICHAEL R RAKE

Tex. Bar No. 16487600 

Michael R. Rake, Attorney at Law

PO Box 1556

Lake Dallas, TX 75065

Tel.: (940) 498-2103 

Fax: (940) 498-2103 

Email: mrake1@mrakeattorney.com

Counsel for Defendant McGaughey, Reber and Associates, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

v. 

REYES GOMEZ-GAYTAN (18), 

Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case Number: 3:22-CR-00145-M 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

 REYES GOMEZ-GAYTAN (18), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 19 of the 

Superseding Indictment. After cautioning and examining REYES GOMEZ-GAYTAN (18) under oath concerning each 

of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the 

offense(s) charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I 

therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that REYES GOMEZ-GAYTAN (18) be adjudged guilty of 

21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B); 18 U.S.C. § 2 Possession with the Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance, Aiding 

and Abetting and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the district judge, 

☐ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. 

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released. 

☐ The Government does not oppose release. 

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release. 

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c). 

☐ The Government opposes release. 

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release. 

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government. 

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released. 

Date: August 1, 2024. 

 ______________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

NOTICE 

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B). 

FILED

KAREN MITCHELL

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT 

COURT August 1, 2024

Case 3:22-cr-00145-M Document 601 Filed 08/01/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 2017
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KHALIL MARSHALL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 275 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of November, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
# QSBL 033123

# QSBL 123122

# QSBL 093022

# QSBL 063022

# QSBL 033122

# QSBL 123121

# QSBL 093021

# QSBL 063021

# QSBL 033121

# QSBL 123120

# QSBL 093020

# QSBL 063020

# QSBL 033120

# QSBL 123119

# QSBL 093019

# QSBL 063019

# QSBL 033119

# QSBL 123118

# QSBL 093018

# QSBL 063018

# QSBL 033118

# QSBL 123117

# QSBL 093017

# QSBL 063017

# QSBL 033117

# QSBL 123116

# QSBL 093016

# QSBL 063016

# QSBL 033116

# QSBL 123115

# QSBL 093015

# QSBL 063015

# QSBL 033115

# QSBL 123114

# QSBL 093014

# QSBL 063014

# QSBL 033114

# QSBL 123113

# QSBL 093013

# QSBL 063013

# QSBL 033113

# QSBL 123112

# QSBL 093012

# QSBL 063012

# QSBL 033112

# QSBL 123111

# QSBL 093011

# QSBL 063011

# QSBL 033111

# image1.png
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)





I, Barrett E. Green, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Entergy New Orleans Storm Recovery Funding I, L.L.C. (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee.





---




Dated: March 22, 2024


By : /s/ Barrett E. Green


Name:  Barrett E. Green


Title: Vice President and Treasurer


of Entergy New Orleans, LLC, as         Servicer


(Senior officer in charge of the    servicing function)
#### SELF v. STATE.

No. 21804.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 10, 1941.

Rollie Fancher, of Seymour, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is. for possessing beer and wine for the purpose of sale in dry territory, punishment assessed being a fine of $100.

Prosecution was by complaint and information. The original transcript did not contain the complaint but it is ' brought before - us by supplemental transcript. As it appears therein it is not sufficient as a basis for the information.

Subdivision 2 of Art. 222-, C.C.P., provides that the complaint “must show that the accused ’has committed some offense against the laws of the State, either directly or that the affiant has good reason to believe, *and does believe,*that the accused has committed such offense.” The complaint here omits the averment that affiant “does believe”. It has been the consistent holding of the court that such averment is indispensable. See Branch’s Ann.Tex.P.C., Sec. 478, and cases there cited; also, Smith v. State, 103 Tex.Cr.R. 228, 280 S.W. 581; Ward v. State, 119 Tex.Cr.R. 48, 121 Tex.Cr.R. 260, 21 S.W.2d 297; Gribble v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 357, 111 S.W.2d 276; Cook v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 492, 132 S.W.2d 404.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
#### THARP v. STATE.

No. 24445.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 26, 1949.

None on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, Statens Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES; Judge.

The conviction is for operating a motor vehicle upon a public street while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The penalty assessed is a fine of $100.

The complaint and information, as well as all other matters of procedure, appear to be in regular form. The record is 'before this court without a statement of facts or ■bills- of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.2








STATEMENT
OF EDWARD W. WILHELM,


EXECUTIVE
VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF BORDERS GROUP, INC.


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I, Edward
W. Wilhelm, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 2, 2008, of
Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that
the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Borders
Group, Inc.




















Date:
_September 5,
2008__________________________________






_/s/EDWARD W.
WILHELM_______________________________________
 Edward W.
Wilhelm
 Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 Borders
Group, Inc.
No. 72-1206.

#### Reader’s Digest Assn., Inc. *v.*Washington.

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Wash, dismissed for want of substantial federal question.
Complete the following tables for each sampling pointPlant NameSampleCollectionNumberDate of SampleCollectionSample CollectionTime Temperature (°C)pH(S.U.)Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Plant NameSampleCollectionNumberInfluent SamplesCollected asGrabs(Yes or No)Mercury and CyanideSamples Collectedas Grabs(Yes or No)Effluent SamplesCollected as 24-HourComposites(Yes or No)Tyvek Suitsused(Yes or No)Dust MasksUsed forMercury(Yes or No)Clean Hands/DirtyHands SamplingTechniques Used(Yes or No)Description of SampleCollection Technique (ifdifferent thaninstructions)Description of AbnormalConditions in FGD Systemor FGD WastewaterTreatment System that MayImpact ConcentrationsSet 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Complete the following tables based on the plant operating characteristics during each set of samples collectedUnits OperatingDuring SamplingDayUnits Off-lineEntireSampling DaySCRs/SNCRsOperating onUnitsSet 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Flow Rate (gpm) DurationSet 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Lime Usage(tons)Ferric ChlorideUsage(Liters/day)Organosulfide Usage(Liters/day)Polymer Usage(Liters/day)Acid Usage(Liters/day)ChemicalPrecipitationSystem EffluentFlow Rate (gpd)Set 1Set 2Set 3Set 4Percent HydrocloneOverflow RecycledBack to ScrubberFGD Wastewater Treatment Operation During Sample CollectionPlant NameSampleCollectionNumberDate of SampleCollectionScrubber PurgeFlow Rate DuringInfluent SampleCollection(gpm)Plant NameSampleCollectionNumberDate of SampleCollectionPlant Operation During Sample CollectionPlant NameSampleCollectionNumberDate of SampleCollectionPlant Operation During Sample CollectionScrubber Slurry Blowdown FlowRateScrubber SlurryPercent Solids

# Unit 1 Unit 2 Daily Power Generation (MW-hrs)

Plant Name Date Provide the daily power generation for each scrubbed unit starting two weeks prior to the first

set of samples through the last set of samples

# FGD Wastewater Treatment System Flow

Rates

(gpd)

Chemical Precipitation Effluent Plant Name Date Provide the average flow rate in the FGD wastewater treatment system for each stream included in the

table starting two weeks prior to the first set of samples through the last set of samples
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20997

Summary Calendar

MR MANUEL GAY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; 

U.S. DISTRICT COURT,

Southern District of Texas, Houston Division; 

IRVIN, Federal DEA Agent; 

DAVID WOMACK, Montgomery County Task Force,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 4:06-CV-3661

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 15, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-20997

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

2

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Manuel Gay, Texas prisoner # 597893, appeals the dismissal of his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 suit as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The suit

challenges a federal forfeiture order for his pickup truck that was seized after

Gay was convicted of a federal drug offense.

Gay does not address the findings thatthe judge who presided over the forfeiture proceeding is absolutely immune from suit and that Gay’s claim regarding the forfeiture is barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Failure

to identify any error in the district court’s analysis is the same as if the appellant had not appealed. Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813

F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Although pro se briefs are liberally construed,

even pro se litigants must brief arguments to preserve them. Yohey v. Collins,

985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Because Gay has failed to contest the district

court’s reasons for dismissing, he has waived appellate review of those issues.

See id.

Gay argues that the district court erred in not allowing him to amend his

complaint to include facts and defendants that would state a cause of action relating to the forfeiture of his truck. The proposed amendments to the complaint,

however, would not have overcome the finding that any claim relating to the forfeiture is barred by Heck. Accordingly, Gay has not shown that the court erred

in not allowing him to amend his complaint. See Jacquez v. Procunier, 801 F.2d

789, 793 (5th Cir. 1986); Jones v. Greninger, 188 F.3d 322, 326-27 (5th Cir.

1999). 

The appeal is without arguable merit and is dismissed as frivolous. See
No. 06-20997

3

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Gay is

warned that the district court’s dismissal of his complaint and the dismissal of

this appeal count as strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and thatif he accumulates

three strikes, he will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action

or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is

under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See Adepegba v. Hammons,

103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996).

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.