alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SMITH v. STATE.

No. 22164.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 10, 1942.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 14, 1942.

H. C. Hooser, of Big Spring, and John O. Harris, of Coleman, for appellant.

. Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Upon his plea of guilty appellant was convicted of theft of property over the value of $50, and by the jury sentenced to serve two years in the State prison.

There are no bills of exceptions in the record. Appellant did not offer any defensive matter, but did file an application for a suspended sentence, which request was refused by the jury.

The facts are sufficient to show the theft of four tires, tubes and wheels from the parties named in the indictment.

There is nothing further to review, and no error appearing the judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant in his motion for a rehearing contends that we erred in affirming this case on the original submission thereof because he was deprived of a statement of facts without any fault on his part. The record does not sustain appellant’s contention. We find that a statement of the facts proven on the trial was agreed to by the District Attorney and defendant’s counsel who was appointed by the court to represent him and did represent him upon his trial. This statement of facts was approved by the trial judge and ordered filed; and it was filed in due time in the court below and brought to this court with the record. Consequently appellant has not been deprived of a statement of facts.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court
<PAGE>

                     32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CEO

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund II,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, George S. Springsteen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ George S. Springsteen
-------------------------
George S. Springsteen
Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004
#### FERRELL v. STATE.

No. 26259.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 11, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The offense is the unlawful possession of whisky for sale in a dry area, with punishment assessed at a fine of $300 and 30 days in jail.

The record contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
ETH LANG-MIERS EL JU Order issued: October 10 , 2012

In The 

## (Court uiApptats JAMIE Distrirt øf a'rxas at Dallas

No. 05-12-01283-CV IN THE INTEREST OF L.S.J., A CHILD On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-11-12980-Z



### ORDER We GRANT the October 3, 2012 motion for an extension of time to file the reporter' s record filed by Glenda Johnson, Official Court Reporter for the 256th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. Ms. Johnson shall file the reporter's record on or before October 15, 2012.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2017

d0321 

# Order

Clerk March 24, 2017

155349

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 155349

COA: 335702

Antrim CC: 16

- 004775

- FC

RANDY ALLAN HIATT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to

the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered , and the application for

leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-129028,
333-131518, 333-138720 and 333-141977) of Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc. and in the related Prospectus and in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-116545, 333-125322, 333-133096 and 333-141983) of our reports dated March 14, 2008, with respect to
the financial statements of Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc., included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.

|                      |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------
|San Diego, California |  |                      
|March 14, 2008        |  |                      

---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-2814-002]

Take notice that on October 25, 2000, Commonwealth Edison Company (ComEd), tendered for filing an executed Dynamic Scheduling Agreement (DSA) with Commonwealth Edison Company in its Wholesale Merchant Function (WEG).

ComEd requests the same effective date of January 1, 2000 for the DSA that ComEd requested and was granted in docket No. ER00-940-000, in which ComEd submitted an unexecuted DSA between ComEd and WEG.

ComEd has served a copy of this filing on WEG and on the parties listed on the official service list in this proceeding.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before November 15, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-29174  Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

 

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C27 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from March 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

  

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 23

- 00061

- CR

IN RE ALLAN LATOI STORY

Original Proceeding

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- 2499

- C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Allan Latoi Story , acting pro se

, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

seeking to compel the trial court to rule on his “Petition for Depositions Before Suit or to

Investigate Claims.” Story’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

MATT JOHNSON

JusticeIn re Story Page 2 Before Chief Justice Gray, *

Justice Johnson

, 1 and

Justice Smith

*(Chief Justice Gray dissenting)

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed May 17, 2023

Do not publish

[OT06]

1 This memorandum opinion was circulated by the authoring justice for review by the panel members on

March 29, 2023.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 160

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To correct the enrollment of H.R. 3123.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 160

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3123,

3 to improve the electric and telephone loan programs car4 ried out under the Rural Electrification Act of 1936, and

5 for other purposes, the Clerk of the House shall make the

6 following correction:

7 On page 4, line 16, of the House engrossed bill,

8 strike ‘‘urban’’ and insert ‘‘urbanized’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 6,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1








Certification Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The
following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 of Hub Group, Inc. pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be deemed filed
pursuant to any provision of the Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities
law.




Each of
the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Hub Group, Inc.








/s/ David
      P.Yeager
            /s/ Terri A.
      PizzutoDavid P.
      Yeager
            Terri A.
      PizzutoChairman and
      Chief Executive Officer
            Executive Vice
      President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerHub
      Group, Inc.
            Hub
      Group, Inc.
Case 5:22-cr-00045-H-BQ Document 49 Filed 07/28/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 87
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# TIME AND DATE:

2:00 p.m., November 15, 2000 

*Place:*                         Alan K. Campbell Auditorium, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Theodore Roosevelt Building, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. The Campbell Auditorium is located on the ground floor.                     

*Status:*                         This meeting will be open to the public. Seating will be available on a first-come, first-served basis. Individuals with special access needs wishing to attend should contact OPM at the number shown below to obtain appropriate accommodations.                     

*Matters to be considered:*                         This meeting will consist of an awards ceremony. The 2000 John N. Sturdivant National Partnership Award will be presented to this year's winners. The John N. Sturdivant National Partnership Award is given in recognition of outstanding labor-management partnership activities.                     

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jeffrey Sumberg, Director, Office of Labor & Employee Relations, Office of Personnel Management, Theodore Roosevelt Building, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 7H28, Washington, DC 20415-0001, (202) 606-2930. 

Office of Personnel Management.

Janice R. LaChance, 

Director.

[FR Doc. 00-28615 Filed 11-7-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325-01-U
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1652

TORRIE JOHNSON,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; FREDERICK BEALEFELD, 

Police Commissioner Individually and as Police Commissioner 

of the Baltimore City Police Department; ADAM LONG, Police 

Officer, Sequence #F648 Individually and as a Police 

Officer of the Baltimore City Police Department; BERNARD 

TAYLOR, Police Officer, Sequence #1635 Individually and as 

a Police Officer of the Baltimore City Police Department; 

JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, Individually and as Currently 

Unknown Police Officers of the Baltimore City Police 

Department; RICHARD AND JANE ROES 1-10, Individually and as 

Currently Unknown Supervisors of the Baltimore City Police 

Department; LYNETTE MORTON, Parking Control Agent Baltimore 

City Department of Transportation; LINDA MCCLELAN, Parking 

Control Agent Baltimore City Department of Transportation; 

JAMES DOE, Director, Individually and as Currently Unknown 

Director(on May 1, 2010) of Baltimore City Department of 

Transportation; MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:12-cv-00646-WDQ)

Submitted: July 25, 2013 Decided: July 29, 2013

Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
2

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Torrie Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Constantine 

Sakles, BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Towson, Maryland; 

Danielle Grilli Marcus, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP,

Thurman Wilbert Zollicoffer, Jr., City Solicitor, Baltimore, 

Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Torrie Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying Johnson’s motions to appoint counsel, to extend 

the time to file her amended complaint, to strike the answer, to 

file a surreply to the answer, and to modify the scheduling 

order. The Appellees McLean and Morton have moved to dismiss 

the appeal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over 

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory 

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-46 (1949). The order Johnson seeks to appeal is neither a 

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we grant Appelees’ motion and dismiss the appeal 

for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Johnson’s motion to appoint 

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 62

Encouraging employee achievement awards.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 11, 1993

Mr. GOODLING submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Encouraging employee achievement awards.

Whereas the Nation is recovering from a prolonged recession

which requires businesses to continue to find ways to increase productivity and quality to enable this country to

ready its work force for the year 2000,

Whereas businesses should seek ideas from their employees

on improving productivity, quality, efficiency, and competitiveness, which would advance the overall ideas of

total quality management, and

Whereas businesses should encourage employees to offer such

ideas through monetary and other rewards: Now, therefore, be it,

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That businesses should offer monetary

3 awards to employees who offer ideas to improve productiv-
2

•HCON 62 IH

1 ity, quality, efficiency, and competitiveness; and Congress

2 should encourage such awards by enacting significant tax

3 incentives for employees to contribute to business produc4 tivity and quality and for businesses to reward such

5 contributions.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 68162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29015]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 00-136]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of prospective patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that Cullimore & Ring Technologies, 
Inc., of Littleton, CO, has applied for a co-exclusive license to 
practice the invention described and claimed in NASA Case Number MFS 
31303-1, entitled ``Generalized Fluid System Simulation Program 
(GFSSP),'' which is assigned to the United States of America as 
represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration. Written objections to the prospective grant of a 
license should be sent to: Mr. James McGroary, Patent Counsel/LS01, 
Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by January 16, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Sammy Nabors, Marshall Space 
Flight Center, Technology Transfer Department/CD30, Huntsville, AL 
35812; Tel. (256) 544-5226.

    Dated: November 6, 2000.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-29015 Filed 11-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 241

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the railroad retirement

system.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 20, 1994

Mr. PETE GEREN of Texas submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the railroad

retirement system.

Whereas the railroad industry is acknowledged as the originator of private company pensions in the United States;

Whereas, in the 1930s, the United States Congress assumed

the responsibility for developing a federally administered

retirement program to place the various railroad pension

plans on a solid financial basis;

Whereas the railroad retirement system today covers over

1,500,000 individuals who have contributed over the

years in good faith and who have legitimate expectations

of receiving their benefits;

Whereas the National Performance Review in its report,

‘‘From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government
2

•HCON 241 IH

That Works Better and Costs Less’’, proposes to transfer

the functions of the Railroad Retirement Board to the

Social Security Administration, to other Federal agencies,

and to ‘‘private section service providers’’;

Whereas this proposal would privatize and terminate a program that has worked well and provided retirement security to millions of people for nearly 60 years;

Whereas current and future railroad retirement beneficiaries

vehemently oppose the transfer;

Whereas this action threatens to disrupt earned and needed

benefits for 1,500,000 active, retired, and disabled rail

workers and their families; and

Whereas this proposal would adversely affect all active and

retired railroad employees and their families in the great

State of Texas and nationwide: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) a continued Federal commitment to the rail4 road retirement system is essential to assure the in5 tegrity of the railroad retirees’ benefits; and

6 (2) the preservation of the present structure of

7 the railroad retirement system, including the admin8 istrative framework of the Railroad Retirement

9 Board, is necessary to fulfill the time-honored re10 sponsibility of the Federal Government.

Æ