alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 248 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 248

   Providing for the printing of eulogies and encomiums of the late 
 President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, as expressed in the 
                House of Representatives and the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 1994

  Mr. Michel submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for the printing of eulogies and encomiums of the late 
 President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, as expressed in the 
                House of Representatives and the Senate.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That there be printed with illustrations as a House document the 
eulogies and encomiums of the late President of the United States, 
Richard M. Nixon, as expressed in the House of Representatives and the 
Senate. Such publications to include the text of the funeral services 
held in Yorba Linda, California; and that thirty-two thousand five 
hundred additional copies shall be printed, of which twenty-two 
thousand one hundred and fifty shall be for the use of the House of 
Representatives and ten thousand three hundred and fifty shall be for 
the use of the Senate; or such numbers of copies of the document as 
does not exceed a total production and printing costs of $500,000.
    Sec. 2. The copy shall be prepared and bound in such style as the 
Joint Committee on Printing may direct.

                                 <all>
```
1

Mears, Gilbert

From: Elizabeth Donohoe <shiatsuworks@yahoo.com>

Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 10:22 PM

To: Mears, Gilbert

Subject: EPA-HQ-TRI-2013-0281

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Mr. Gilbert Mears

Docket #: EPA-HQ-TRI-2013-0281 

Mears.gilbert@epa.gov

Toxics Release Inventory Program Division 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

 

Mr. Mears: 

Writing to you today from the western Marcellus Shale region of the country, urging the closing of the TRI loophole that 

is currently being used by the oil and gas industry to hide what they are releasing all over Pennsylvania. Citizens deserve 

to know what is being released into the air and water and onto the land around us; corporate influence on government 

agencies and officials is interfering with our right to know what we are drinking and breathing. 

EPA actions are being closely watched. I expect to see this issue resolved in favor of what the EPA is charged with 

protecting: The air, the water, the land...and all living things that depend on those three being unpolluted. 

We want to know what the oil and gas industry is dumping: Close the loophole. 

Thank you.

Elizabeth Donohoe 

Pittsburgh, PA
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE
901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.
100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR
EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

January 29, 2015

Hon. Sheri Woodfin

District Clerk Tom Green County Courthouse 112 West Beauregard San Angelo, TX 76903

- 5850

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 13

- 00404

- CR

Tr.Ct.No. B

- 07

- 1399

- S Style: JOHNNY FAZ LOPEZ JR. AKA JOHNN Y FAZ LOPEZ v. THE STATE OF

TEXAS

The judgment of the trial court was AFFIRMED by this Court on the 3 rd day of July,

2014 . The mandate is enclosed.

Tex R. App. P. 51.2(a)(1) provides that the clerk of the trial court shall send an acknowledgment to the clerk of th e appellate court of the receipt of the mandate. Please review the requirements of Tex. R. App. P. 51.2(b) regarding the issuance of a capias in cases in which the trial court’s judgment is affirmed and the defendant is not in custody.

Please sign the at tached acknowledgment of receipt of the mandate and submit through the TAMES Records Submission Portal (RSP) as soon as possible.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER: ch

Enc.

cc: Hon. George E. McCrea Hon. Kelly J. Workman

- Ellis Mr. Johnny Fa z Lopez

I hereby acknowledge receipt of the mandate in cause no. 13

- 13

- 00404

- CR this

________ day of _________________, 201 5

. District/County Clerk,

By :____________________________
1 The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-4180

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Daren Hill, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 12, 2005 Filed: January 25, 2006

___________ Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Daren Hill pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. The Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) reco mmended that Hill be sentenced as an armed career criminal under § 4B1.4(a) of the federal sentencing guidelines because he had at least three prior convictions for violent felonies or serious drug offenses. The district court 1 adopted the recommendations of the PSR, found that the applicable sentencing range was 188–235 months, and se ntenced Hill to 200 months in prison and five years of supervised release. Hill appeals his sentence, and we affirm.-2- Hill first argues that the district court erred in sentencing him as an armed career criminal because he did not admit, nor did a jury determine beyond a reasonable doubt, that his prior convictions were violent felonies or serious drug offenses. We have consistently rej ected this argument and held that the characterization of prior convictions is a legal question outside the purview of the Sixth Amendment. United States v.Turnbough , 425 F.3d 1112, 1114 (8th Cir. 2005); United States v. Marcussen , 403 F.3d 982, 984 (8th Cir. 2005).
Next, Hill argues that the district court erred in sentencing him under a mandatory guidelines scheme and that th e case should be remanded for resentencing. Hill is correct that the district court erred in applying the guidelines as mandatory. United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005). Because Hill preserved this Booker argument by arguing Blakely v. Washington , 542 U.S. 296 (2004), in the district court, we review for harmless error. United States v. Haidley , 400 F.3d 642, 644 (8th Cir. 2005). We have held that mandatory application of the guidelines is harmless error when the district court had the disc retion to impose a lesser sentence but instead sentenced the defendant in the middle of the sentencing range. United States v. Millot , slip op. (8th Cir. Jan. 9, 2006); see also United States v. Perez-Ramirez , 415 F.3d 876, 878 (8th Cir. 2005). That is the case here, because the district court sentenced Hill to 200 months’ imprisonment and five years’ supervised release when it could have sentenced him to 188 months’ imprisonment under the mandatory guidelines.
The judgment is affirmed.

_____________________________
#### In the Matter of the Application of New York State Commission Against Discrimination, Petitioner, against Pelham Hall Apartments, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Westchester County,

January 15, 1958.

*Alfred Avins,*for motion to intervene.

*Henry Spitz, Milton Rosenberg*and *Evelyn E. West*for petitioner, opposed.

Samuel W. Eager, J.

This is a proceeding brought by the Commission Against Discrimination pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to enforce its order directed against alleged discriminatory practices with respect to leasing of apartments in a certain apartment dwelling alleged to be publicly-assisted housing accommodations. Application is made by three certain tenants of the premises to intervene for the purpose of opposing the enforcement of the order of the commission. They say that the order, if enforced, will have a definite effect upon their homes and families and that they are aggrieved by the order; and they contend that they should be given an opportunity to defend and protect their interests.

The application by the tenants to intervene is denied. They were not parties in the proceeding before the commission. They are not affected in any way in any property or other legal rights by the order of the commission. Therefore, they are not persons “ aggrieved ” by such order entitling them to a judicial review thereof within the meaning of the provisions of section 298 of the Executive Law.

Settle order on notice.
March 13, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

AVELO MORTGAGE, LLC, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00463-CV V.

INFINITY CAPITAL, LLC, Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Infinity Capital, 

LLC, signed April 13, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected 

the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below 

AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Avelo Mortgage, LLC, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
NO. 07-02-0103-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	MAY 30, 2002

	______________________________

	MR AND MRS. CARL KENNEDY; BOONE PICKENS;

	QUIXX WRR, L.P., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., APPELLANTS

	V.

	CANADIAN RIVER MUNICIPAL WATER AUTHORITY, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 31ST DISTRICT COURT OF ROBERTS COUNTY;

	NO. 1810; HONORABLE STEVEN EMMERT, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	On May 23, 2002, the appellants filed a  Motion to Dismiss Appeal averring that they have settled their claims and no longer wish to pursue the appeal and that the appeal should be dismissed.

	Without passing on the merits of the case, the appellants’  Motion to Dismiss Appeal is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).  No order pertaining to costs is hereby made as all costs have been paid.  Having dismissed the appeal at the appellants’ request and because the appellee is not opposed to such a request,  no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

							Phil Johnson

							    Justice

Do not publish.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.4

                            KOLMAR LABORATORIES, INC.
                         FIXED CHARGE RATIO COMPUTATION
                                (GUARANTORS ONLY)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                            --------------------------------------
                                                              1998           1999           2000
                                                            --------       --------       --------
                                                                      (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                                         <C>            <C>           <C>
Income (loss) before taxes ..........................       $  2,063       $  3,609       $ (2,580)
Fixed charges reflected in income (loss) before taxes
   Interest expense .................................             80            349           (157)
   One third of rental expenses .....................            190            358            417
                                                            --------       --------       --------
Total fixed charges .................................       $    270       $    707       $    260
                                                            --------       --------       --------

Income (loss) before taxes plus fixed charges above .       $  2,333       $  4,316       $ (2,320)
                                                            ========       ========       ========
Fixed charge ratio ..................................          8.64x          6.10x         (8.92x)
  Deficiency.........................................                                        2,580
</TABLE>
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee*: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group Population Research Subcommittee.                    

*Dates*: March 9-10, 2000.                    

*Time*: 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM.                    

*Agenda*: To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place*: American Inn, 8130 Wisconsin Avenue Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person*: Jon M. Ranhand, PhD Health Scientist Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Blvd., Rm. 5E01, MSC 7510, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6884.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 3, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-2910  Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Intro

# Core Q1-14, 16-89

# Core Perf Q15

# Core Trend Items

# Pandemic Phy. Present Q90

# Telework Remote Work Q91-Q95

# Pandemic Ldrs Q96-Q99

# Demographics

# ASI
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28868]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

[Document Identifier: HCFA-10013]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration, HHS.
    In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Health Care Financing 
Administration (HCFA), Department of Health and Human Services, is 
publishing the following summary of proposed collections for public 
comment. Interested persons are invited to send comments regarding this 
burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, 
including any of the following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility 
of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of 
the agency's functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) 
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology to minimize the information 
collection burden.
    Type of Information Collection Request: New collection; Title of 
Information Collection: Medicare beneficiary line survey; Form No.: 
HCFA-10013 (OMB# 0938-NEW); Use: This survey will be used by the 
Michigan Peer Review Organization to obtain information that will 
assist it in improving its services; Frequency: On occasion; Affected 
Public: Individuals or households; Number of Respondents: 3,600; Total 
Annual Responses: 360; Total Annual Hours: 90.
    To obtain copies of the supporting statement and any related forms 
for the proposed paperwork collections referenced above, access HCFA's 
Web Site address at http://www.hcfa.gov/regs/prdact95.htm, or E-mail 
your request, including your address, phone number, OMB number, and 
HCFA document identifier, to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d888b9a8bdaaafb7aab398b0bbbeb9f6bfb7ae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0656677663747169746d466e65606728616970">[email protected]</span></a>, or call the Reports 
Clearance Office on (410) 786-1326. Written comments and 
recommendations for the proposed information collections must be mailed 
within 30 days of this notice directly to the OMB desk officer: OMB 
Human Resources and Housing Branch, Attention: Wendy Taylor, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: October 31, 2000.
John P. Burke III,
HCFA Reports Clearance Officer, HCFA Office of Information Services, 
Security and Standards Group, Division of HCFA Enterprise Standards.
[FR Doc. 00-28868 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-03-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

JERRY BLANEY,

Plaintill

TDCJ, WARDEN BOWERS,

Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-938-C-BH

ORDER

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation ofthe United

States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that this civil action should be dismissed

without prejudice for improper venue.

The Court conducts ade novo review ofthose portions of the Magistrate Judge's report or

specified proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely objection is made. 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(bX1)(C). Portions ofthe report or proposed findings or recommendations that are not the

subject of a timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or

contrary to law. See United States v. llilson,864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989).

After due consideration and having conducted a de novo review, the Court finds that

Plaintifls objections should be OVERRULED. The Court has fu(her conducted an

independent review of the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions and finds no error. It is

therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

Case 3:22-cv-00938-C-BH Document 6 Filed 05/23/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 43
ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, the

Court ORDERS that this civil action be DISMISSED without prejudice for improper venue.

SO ORDERED.

out"avtuy f,l,zozz,

R.

OR

GS

STATES JUDGE

z7?

I

Case 3:22-cv-00938-C-BH Document 6 Filed 05/23/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 44
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136415 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136415 

 COA: 284076 

Clinton CC: 05-007710-FC 

STEVEN JAMES GILBERT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 7, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 210

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the President should not have

granted diplomatic recognition to the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1994

Ms. SNOWE (for herself, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. ANDREWS of New

Jersey, Mrs. MALONEY, and Mr. DEUTSCH) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign

Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the President

should not have granted diplomatic recognition to the

Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

Whereas the United States has strong and enduring economic, political, and strategic ties with the Hellenic Republic of Greece;

Whereas Greece has been a strategic ally of the United States

in the Eastern Mediterranean during every major conflict

in this century;

Whereas historical and archaeological evidence demonstrates

that the ancient Macedonians were Greek;

Whereas Macedonia is a Greek name that has designated the

northern area of Greece for over 2,000 years;
2

•HCON 210 IH

Whereas in 1944, the United States opposed the changing of

the name of the Skopje region of Yugoslavia by Marshall

Tito from Vardar Banovina to Macedonia as part of a

campaign to gain control of the Greek province of Macedonia, and the major port city of Salonika;

Whereas the regime in Skopje has persisted in inflaming tensions between it and Greece through a sustained propaganda campaign and the continued use of an ancient

Greek symbol, the Star of Vergina, in its flag;

Whereas the Skopje regime has refused to remove paragraph

49 from its constitution, a reference to the 1944 declaration by the then communist regime calling for the ‘‘unification’’ of neighboring territories in Greece and Bulgaria

with the ‘‘Macedonian Republic’’;

Whereas Greece has no claim on the territory of the former

Yugoslav republic of Macedonia and has repeatedly

reaffirmed the inviolability of all borders in the area of

the 2 countries; and

Whereas it is in the best interest of the United States to oppose any expansionist or irredentist policies in order to

promote peace and stability in the area: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the President should not have extended dip4 lomatic recognition to the Skopje regime that insists

5 on using the Greek name of Macedonia; and

6 (2) the President should reconsider this deci7 sion and withdraw diplomatic recognition until such
3

•HCON 210 IH

1 time as the Skopje regime renounces its use of the

2 name Macedonia, removes objectionable language in

3 paragraph 49 of its constitution, removes symbols

4 which imply territorial expansion such as the Star of

5 Vergina in its flag, ceases propaganda against

6 Greece, and adheres fully to Conference on Security

7 and Cooperation in Europe norms and principles.

Æ