alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

         The undersigned, Thomas C. Shields, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





Dated:  April 28, 2004
                                          By: /s/ Thomas C. Shields
                                              ---------------------------
                                              Thomas C. Shields
                                              Senior Vice President
                                              and Chief Financial Officer





This certification shall not be deemed to be "filed" for the purpose of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be
incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as
being incorporated by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be
retained by ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 68991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29194]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP97-249-001]


Viking Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Negotiated Rate

November 8, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 31, 2000, Viking Gas Transmission 
Company (Viking) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become 
effective November 1, 2000:

Third Revised Sheet No. 7
Third Revised Sheet No. 8
Third Revised Sheet No. 9

    Viking states that these tariff sheets reflect the implementation 
of a new negotiated rate contact between Viking and Wisconsin Public 
Service. Viking requests an effective date of November 1, 2000 and 
accordingly requests waiver of the Commission's notice requirements.
    Viking states that copies of this filing have been served on 
Viking's jurisdictional customers and to affected state regulatory 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29194 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

                                AMENDMENT No. 12

                                       to

                       AMETEK RETIREMENT AND SAVINGS PLAN

              WHEREAS, there was adopted and made effective as of October 1,
1984, the AMETEK Retirement and Savings Plan (the "Plan"); and

              WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated in its entirety,
effective January 1, 1997; and

              WHEREAS, Section 10.1 of the Plan provides that AMETEK, Inc.
("AMETEK") may amend the Plan at any time, and from time to time; and

              WHEREAS, AMETEK, for certain retention and recruiting reasons has
decided to allow the following employees to participate in the Plan as follows:

              Effective February 21, 2000 for Michael Davis who directly
              transferred his employment from the Dixson Division of AMETEK,
              Inc. to the National Controls Corporation Division of AMETEK, Inc.
              ("NCC"), effective March 2, 2000 for David A. Gizewicz who
              directly transferred his employment from AMETEK, Inc. to NCC,
              effective January 1, 2000 for Walter B. Wooldridge new hire of
              NCC, effective April 1, 2000 for new hires Larry D. Augsburger and
              James F.Solari of NCC, and effective July 1, 2000 for John
              Meggesin new of NCC.

              WHEREAS, AMETEK now desires to amend the Plan in certain respects;

              NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

              FIRST: Appendix VI to the Plan is amended by renumbering Section 4
as Section 5, and adding a new Section 4 to read in its entirety as follows:

              "4.  The following employees of the National Controls Corporation
Division of AMETEK, Inc. ("NCC") shall be eligible to participate in the Plan as
of the respective dates set forth below:

                   Michael Davis            February 21, 2000
<PAGE>   2
                   David A. Gizewicz        March 2, 2000
                   Walter B. Wooldridge     January 1, 2000
                   Larry D. Augsburger      April 1, 2000
                   James F. Solari          April 1, 2000
                   John Meggesin            July 1, 2000"

              SECOND: The provisions of this Amendment No. 12 shall be effective
as of June 6, 2000.

              IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AMETEK has caused these presents to be
executed, in its corporate name, by its duly authorized officer on this 30th day
of June, 2000.

                                                 AMETEK, Inc.

                                                 By: /s/ Donna F. Winquist
                                                     ---------------------------

Attest:

/s/ Kathryn E. Londra
---------------------------
Exhibit 99.1(a)
                                                                 ---------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Homeseekers.com,   Inc,  (the
 "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2002 as filed with
 the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
 Thomas  Chaffee,  Chairman  of the  Board and Chief  Executive  Officer  of the
 Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Company.




 /S/ Thomas Chaffee
 -------------------------
 Thomas Chaffee
 Chairman of the Board and
 Chief Executive Officer
 November 18, 2002


<PAGE>
. ,, . •~1. U . . •• · .•. , ; I 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT '·~;:.·_:'·- .. : . --~.·: ·• 

FORTHENORTHERNDISTRICTOFTEXAS -~ · :, ., ., .. -,., 

LUBBOCK DIVISION 2D22 JU! 20 p -. 11 3: t? 

... UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

V. CASE NO. 5:22-CR-033-H-BQ-1 

TAYLOR WATSON 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA 

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

This case has been referred by the United States district judge to the undersigned 

for the taking of a guilty plea. The parties have consented to appear before a United States 

magistrate judge for these purposes. This Report and Recommendation on Plea is submitted 

to the court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). 

The defendant appeared with counsel before the undersigned United States 

magistrate judge, who addressed the defendant personally in open court and informed the 

defendant of, and determined that the defendant understood, the admonitions contained in 

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

The defendant pleaded guilty (under a written plea bargain agreement with the 

government) to Count One of the Superseding Information, charging defendant with a 

violation of 21 US.C. §§ 84J(a)(l) and 84J(b)(J)(C), that is, Possession with Intent to 

Distribute Heroin. After examining Defendant under oath the undersigned magistrate 

judge finds the following: 

1. Defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing 

to enter this guilty plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final 

approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge; 

Case 5:22-cr-00033-H-BQ Document 30 Filed 07/20/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 54
2. Defendant fully understands the nature of the charges (including each 

essential element of the offense(s) charged) and penalties; 

3. Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea 

agreement supplement; 

4. Defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes 

to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right 

to appear before a United States district judge; 

5. Defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily; 

6. Defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; 

7. There is a factual basis for this plea; and 

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of 

guilty. 

Although I have conducted these proceedings and recommend acceptance of 

Defendant's plea of guilty, the United States district judge has the power to review my 

actions and possesses final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if 

Defendant has any objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he 

is required to make those known to the United States district judge within fourteen (14) 

days of today. 

Based on the above, I recommend that Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted, that 

Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. 

Signed July 20, 2022. 

------7 

Case 5:22-cr-00033-H-BQ Document 30 Filed 07/20/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 55
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 94

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the expression of selfdetermination by the people of Puerto Rico.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1993

Mr. SERRANO submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred jointly to the Committees on Foreign Affairs and Natural Resources

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the

expression of self-determination by the people of Puerto Rico.

Whereas the people of Puerto Rico are natural-born citizens

of the United States but do not enjoy all of the individual

rights and liberties accorded to other American citizens

under the United States Constitution;

Whereas the future status of Puerto Rico remains under discussion among residents of the Island of Puerto Rico and

among Puerto Ricans residing in the 50 States of the

United States; and

Whereas the Charter of the United Nations, a treaty to which

the United States is a signatory, expresses the right of

self-determination, that is the right of a people to decide

for themselves the political status under which they live:

Now, therefore, be it
2

•HCON 94 IH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) reaffirms the commitment of the people of

4 the United States to the principle of self-determina5 tion;

6 (2) reasserts the principle, first articulated by

7 the Congress in its ratification of the Charter of the

8 United Nations, that with respect to territories

9 whose peoples have not yet attained a full measure

10 of self-government, the interests of the inhabitants

11 of such territories are paramount; and

12 (3) endorses the right of the people of Puerto

13 Rico to political self-determination.

Æ
2017 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item
1123)



Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling
and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of March 1, 2015 by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation as Depositor,
KeyBank National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor relating
to the Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, COMM 2015-DC1 Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
(COMM 2015-DC1)





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto
Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:



| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of
January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
has been conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there
has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has
been specifically identified herein.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|Certified by: | /s/ Adam Singer                |  | Date:  March
    1, 2018
|------------- | ------------------------------ |  | ------------------------
|              | Adam Singer, Managing Director |  |
Exhibit 35.16



|     |  |                                                                         
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | CMBS Department 
MAC N9401-011 1055 10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55414

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich
Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|RE: | Annual Statement of Compliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-C32 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015- C32
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



|                 |  | 
|---------------- |  | 
|March 17, 2016  
|                
|/s/ Gail Vannest
|GAIL VANNEST    
|
|Vice President  



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-21-00049-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.B.J., J.M.J., AND J.I.J., CHILDREN

From the 170th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-1730-4

ABATEMENT ORDER

On August 4, 2021, this Court abated this proceeding to the trial court for the trial 

court to enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law within fourteen days. We 

reinstate this proceeding for the purpose of entry of this Order.

The clerk of the trial court has informed the Court that the trial court has not signed 

or entered the required findings and conclusions pursuant to this Court's order. We again 

abate this proceeding to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant 

to the rules of civil procedure. TEX. R. CIV. PROC. 296, et seq.

This Court orders the trial court to sign and deliver to the trial court clerk its 

findings of fact and conclusions of law within 14 days of the date of the issuance of this 

Order. The trial court clerk is ordered to file a supplemental clerk’s record with the Clerk 
In the Interest of J.B.J., J.M.J., and J.I.J., Children Page 2

of this Court within 7 days after the findings and conclusions are received from the trial 

court.

The parties are ordered to assist the trial court to any degree necessary to ensure 

the timely entry of the findings and conclusions. 

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Smith

Motion granted

Abatement Order delivered and issued September 29, 2021

RWR
# QSBL 063023

# QSBL 033123

# QSBL 123122

# QSBL 093022

# QSBL 063022

# QSBL 033122

# QSBL 123121

# QSBL 093021

# QSBL 063021

# QSBL 033121

# QSBL 123120

# QSBL 093020

# QSBL 063020

# QSBL 033120

# QSBL 123119

# QSBL 093019

# QSBL 063019

# QSBL 033119

# QSBL 123118

# QSBL 093018

# QSBL 063018

# QSBL 033118

# QSBL 123117

# QSBL 093017

# QSBL 063017

# QSBL 033117

# QSBL 123116

# QSBL 093016

# QSBL 063016

# QSBL 033116

# QSBL 123115

# QSBL 093015

# QSBL 063015

# QSBL 033115

# QSBL 123114

# QSBL 093014

# QSBL 063014

# QSBL 033114

# QSBL 123113

# QSBL 093013

# QSBL 063013

# QSBL 033113

# QSBL 123112

# QSBL 093012

# QSBL 063012

# QSBL 033112

# QSBL 123111

# QSBL 093011

# QSBL 063011

# QSBL 033111

# image1.png
#### BELL v. STATE.

No. 21509.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 19, 1941.

H. Womack, of McCamey, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was indicted for the murder of Wiley Bell on the 12th day of March, 1937, and, upon being found guilty by a jury, his punishment was assessed at five years in the penitentiary. This was made to run concurrently with another sentence of fifty years.

The record is before this' court without bills of exception or statement of facts, and ' we are unable to find any matter presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.1

HAROLD Y. SPECTOR, CPA
CAROL S. WONG, CPA
                                                            80 SOUTH LAKE AVENUE
                                                                       SUITE 723
                                                      PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91101

                               SPECTOR & WONG, LLP
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                 (888) 584-5577
                               FAX (626) 584-6447
                             spectorwongcpa@aol.com


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-117636, 333-116874, 333-110012,
333-109031 and 333-108029) of our report dated March 25, 2005, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Circle Group Holdings, Inc. and
subsidiaries, which appears in Circle Group Holding's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004.


/s/ Spector & Wong, LLP
---------------------------
Spector & Wong, LLP
Pasadena, California
March 31, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6159

RENARD SAVAGE-BEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EDDIE PEARSON, Warden, Sussex State II Prison,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-01-1126-AM)

Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 6, 2002

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Renard Savage-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* In his informal brief, Savage-Bey states that he also seeks

to appeal the district court’s January 15, 2002, order denying his

motion for reconsideration and his motion to reopen the time to

file an appeal. Although Savage-Bey’s informal brief could be

construed as a notice of appeal, Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248

(1992), the brief was filed beyond the applicable thirty-day appeal

period. Fed. R. App. 4(a)(1). Thus, we do not have jurisdiction

to review the order and express no opinion as to its validity.

2

PER CURIAM:

Renard Savage-Bey appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994).

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Savage-Bey’s

notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is

“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of

Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

August 29, 2001. Savage-Bey’s notice of appeal was filed on

January 17, 2002. Because Savage-Bey failed to file a timely notice

of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal

period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
3

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED