alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BILYEU v. STATE.

No. 25735.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 5, 1952.

No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for murder with malice aforethought; the punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for 99 years.

The record is before this court without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment and all other matters of procedure appear regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
# C_2015099EN.01000301.xml

| 26.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/3

---

Special Report No 3/2015 ‘EU Youth Guarantee: first steps taken but implementation risks ahead’

(2015/C 99/03)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 3/2015 ‘EU Youth Guarantee: first steps taken but implementation risks ahead’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Publications (PUB) |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Publications (PUB)

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU Bookshop.

---
EXHIBIT
      32.1








STATEMENT
      OF GEORGE L. JONES,


PRESIDENT
      AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF BORDERS GROUP, INC.


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I,
      George
      L. Jones, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 3, 2007,
      of
      Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
      that
      the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Borders
      Group, Inc.




















Date:
      December 13, 2007







/s/GEORGE
      L. JONES


George
      L.
      Jones


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


Borders
      Group, Inc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37,906]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on July 24, 2000, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Automation Technology Corp., Santa Cruz, California.

The company official who filed the original petition has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 31th day of October 2000.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-29157  Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
FILED

March 25, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appe llate Court C lerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE 

 JANUARY 1998 SESSION

NELSON B. GRAVES, )

)

Appellant, ) No. 01C01-9705-CR-00171

 )

) Johnson County

v. ) 

) Honorable Lynn W. Brown, Judge 

)

HOWARD CARLTON, WARDEN,) (Habeas Corpus)

and STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) 

)

Appellees. )

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur in the results and most of the reasoning in the majority opinion. I

would hold, though, that the indictments sufficiently contain any necessary mens rea by

allegations that the offenses were “feloniously” committed. Historically, the word

“feloniously” has meant “[p]roceeding from an evil heart or purpose; done with a

deliberate intention of committing a crime.” Black’s Law Dictionary 617 (6th ed. 1990). 

As our supreme court has previously noted, “one meaning attached to the word is: ‘In a

legal sense, done with the intent to commit a crime.’” State v. Smith, 119 Tenn. 521,

526, 105 S.W. 68, 70 (1907). Thus, I believe that the indictments include any required

mens rea. 

____________________________

Joseph M. Tipton, Judge
---

EXHIBIT 13-1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dana Wheeler, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Alexandra Capital Corp.
      for the year ended November 30, 2018 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Alexandra Capital Corp.                                                               

Dated: May 29, 2019



| | /s/Dana Wheeler                                       
| | ------------------------------------------------------
| | Dana Wheeler                                          
| | Chief Executive Officer, President. and
      Director
| | (Principal Executive Officer)                         
| | Alexandra Capital Corp.                               



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Alexandra
Capital Corp. and will be retained by Alexandra Capital Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Case 3:22-cr-00176-B Document 42 Filed 11/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 101
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7383

CHARMEEN JABAR GRAY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:10-cv-00473-CMH-TCB)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 20, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charmeen Jabar Gray, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charmeen Jabar Gray seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Gray has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
#### STUBBLEFIELD v. STATE.

No. 25174.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 28, 1951.

Rehearing Denied April 11, 1951.

*975No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, ■ State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated, with the penalty assessed at one year in the penitentiary.

The evidence amply supports 'the jury’s finding of guilt.

 The bills of exception were not filed within the time -provided by Article 760, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., Sec. 5, and so can not be considered by the court. The trial court attempted to extend the time by entering an order on October 10, 1950, granting thirty days additional time for filing bills of exception and statement of facts. Such order is without force because the thirty days allowed by the above article had already expired. See Taylor v. State, 149 Tex.Cr.R. 493, 196 S.W.2d 520.

There being no complaint properly before the Court nothing is presented for review. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Utah Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Utah Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 11,750 | 11,150 | 11,150 | 11,400 | 11,400 | 11,400 | 11,400 | 11,400
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 11,400 | 11,400 | 11,600 | 12,300 | 12,400 | 13,000 | NA     | 14,600 | NA     | 14,050
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 15,050 | 14,650 | 15,200 | 15,600 | 15,600 | 16,000 | 16,000 | 16,300 | 17,580 | 17,680
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 18,100 | 18,400 | 18,400 | 18,400 | 18,400 | 18,400 | 18,900 | 20,900 | 21,900 | 21,500
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 21,500 | 21,500 | 21,600 | 21,600 | 21,700 |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-60982 Summary Calendar

JAIME ROJO-RESENDIZ Petitioner

v. MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A74 664 018
Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jamie Rojo-Resendiz petitions for review of the final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. The BIA denied the motion to reopen on the ground that RojoResendi z had overstayed his period of voluntary departure and therefore was statutorily ineligible for the relief sought. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d). We review United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 17, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-60982

2 the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. Banda-Ortiz v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 387, 388 (5th Cir. 2006). Rojo-Resendiz at no time sought to withdraw his request for voluntary departure and he states in his reply brief in this court that “Because Mr. Rojo only wishes to voluntary depart now, he is only challenging the issue of automatic tolling of the voluntary departure period.” Rojo-Resendiz argues that his timely filed motion to reopen tolled the voluntary departure period. Rojo-Resendiz’s argument is without merit. See Dada v. Mukasey, 128 S. Ct. 2307, 2318-19 (2008); Banda-Ortiz, 445 F.3d at 391. In this matter, Rojo-Resendiz became ineligible to adjust his status because he failed to depart the United States within the 60-day voluntary departure period, which expired while his motion to reopen w as pending. See § 1229c(d)(B). Accordingly, the BIA did not abuse its disc retion in denying his motion to reopen. See Banda-Ortiz, 445 F.3d at 391; § 1229c(d)(B). Rojo-Resendiz argues that the BIA erred in not rul ing on his motion to stay or extend hisvoluntary departure period, which he filed contemporaneously with his motion to reopen. The applicable statutory and regulatory provisions, however, make clear that the BIA waswithout authority toextend thevoluntary departure period beyond the 60 days already granted. See Dada at 2316; § 1229c(b); 8 C.F.R. § 1240.26(f). Accordingly, the BIA’s implicit denial of the motion to stay or extend the voluntary departure period was not error. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ESI AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      29,451,066
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,627,888
<PP&E>                                       1,844,815
<DEPRECIATION>                                 749,053
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,847,348
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          986,701
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,850
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,847,348
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,926,487)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,865,264)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,865,264)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,865,264)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,865,264)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)
        

</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 Re:         Annual Statement of Compliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C26,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C26

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of December 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2015-SN1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |