alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of 8point3 Energy Partners LP (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended November 30, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles D. Boynton, Chief Executive Officer of 8point3 General Partner, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.




Date:March 21, 2018By:/s/ CHARLES D. BOYNTONCharles D. BoyntonChairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director of 8point3 General Partner, LLC(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 21.1

Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries

|                                  |  |                              
|--------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiary                        |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                  |  |                              
|Aceras BioMedical LLC             |  | Delaware                     
|                                  |  |                              
|Iroquois Capital RR LLC           |  | Delaware                     
|                                  |  |                              
|Miller Mathis & Co., LLC          |  | Delaware                     
|                                  |  |                              
|Rodman & Renshaw, LLC             |  | Delaware                     
|                                  |  |                              
|Rodman Principal Investments, LLC |  | Delaware                     

---
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Concetta Nocera, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Richmond County,

February 20, 1958.

*Braisted & Braisted*for petitioner.

*Trachtenberg & Silverman*for Mary Felter.

John C. Boylan, S.

This is a proceeding for letters of administration. The decedent died on August 9, 1957 survived by four sons and three daughters. Two of the sons have petitioned for letters and consents to their appointment were filed by the other two sons and two of the daughters. The other daughter although not opposing their appointment seeks to have herself join with them as one of the fiduciaries. Her request is made on personal grounds.

During the hearing it became evident that there was hostility between the petitioners and the daughter and any attempt to reconcile their differences would be futile.

Section 118 of the Surrogate’s Court Act lists those persons entitled to letters and provides: “If several persons have an *496equal right to administration, there shall be no preference on account of sex, but that person must be appointed, who will, in the judgment of the surrogate, best manage the estate of the intestate And further *“*If there are several persons equally entitled to administration, the surrogate may grant letters to one or more of such persons ”.

In view of the circumstances herein and it appearing' that to have the daughter appointed with the petitioners would only unduly prolong the length of time in administering this estate and add unnecessary expenses, and since the petitioners are the choice of all of the other distributees, the court, exercising its discretion in the best interest of the estate, directs that letters of administration issue to the petitioners upon their qualifying according to law.

Proceed accordingly.
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|U.S. Refinery Sulfur Production Capacity as of January 1 (Short Tons per Day)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|U.S. Refinery Sulfur Production Capacity as of January 1 (Short Tons per Day)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 23,806 | 27,639 | 28,369
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 24,202 | 23,875 | 23,811 | 25,940 | 24,554 | 24,885 | NA     | 26,466 | NA     | 26,423
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 26,645 | 27,446 | 29,107 | 29,766 | 30,606 | 31,004 | 32,421 | 33,021 | 33,487 | 33,500
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 34,058 | 35,483 | 36,663 | 39,478 | 41,375 | 41,266 | 41,343 | 41,766 | 41,419 | 41,639
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 41,917 | 40,578 | 40,453 | 40,437 | 40,376 |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-3348

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Appellee

v.

Francisco Velasquez, also known as Cisco,

 also known as Angel Paez-Alvaro

lllllllllllllllllllll Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas

____________

 Submitted: June 10, 2013

Filed: June 14, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
Francisco Velasquez pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute

methamphetamine, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, and the district court sentenced 1

him to 198 months' imprisonment. He contends, first of all, without elaboration, that

his sentence is unconstitutional and "asks that the entire record be reviewed" to

determine if any error occurred in "the conviction and sentencing process." Treating

this part of Mr. Velasquez's brief as an Anders brief, see Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), we have undertaken an independent review pursuant to Penson

v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), and have discovered no non-frivolous issues for

appeal.

Mr. Velasquez also maintains, again without elaboration, that he was denied

his Sixth-Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel in the district court, see

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). But we do not entertain such claims

on direct appeal of a conviction unless a record supporting those claims has been

made in the district court or "the result would otherwise be a plain miscarriage of

justice." See United States v. Hernandez, 281 F.3d 746 (8th Cir. 2002). Neither

exception applies in this case.

Affirmed.

______________________________

The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District of Arkansas.

-2-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ROBERT HOPKINS, III,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,

Defendant.

No. 3:22-CV-00706-E

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANT’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon consideration of Defendant the Department of Defense’s Emergency 

Motion for Extension of Time and accompanying Classified Declaration, the 

Motion is hereby GRANTED. The Department shall issue its revised determination 

to Plaintiff Dr. Robert Hopkins, III regarding the manuscript Crowded Skies by 

September 25, 2023. The Department shall file its motion for summary judgment 

as to all of Dr. Hopkins’s manuscripts by October 4, 2023.

Dated: _________________ ____________________

ADA BROWN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00706-E Document 29-2 Filed 08/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 475
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ACCLARENT, INC., Appellant

v.

FORD ALBRITTON, IV, Appellee

______________________

2018

- 2377

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017

- 00498.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

W ILLIAM C. R OOKLIDGE

, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Irvine, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by

T AYLOR K ING ; L ISA J. A DAMS

, P ETER C UOMO

, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., Boston, MA

.

A SHLEY N ICOLE M OORE , McKool Smith, PC, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by A LEXANDRA
F IGARI E ASLEY

, M EREDITH A NNE E LKINS

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URI AM (P ROST

, Chief Judge, W ALLACH and

H UGHES

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

October 4, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29142]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review 
Committee.
    Date: November 30, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 am to 3:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Bethesda, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Jeffrey H. Hurst, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 
7208, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/435-0303.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)


    Dated: November 3, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-29142 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 99.3



BORDERS
GROUP, INC.

STATEMENT
OF EDWARD W. WILHELM,SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
BORDERS GROUP, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward W. Wilhelm,
certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 26, 2003, of Borders Group, Inc. fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information
contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Borders Group, Inc.

Date: December 10, 2003

/s/ EDWARD W. WILHELM
-----------------------------------------------
Edward W. Wilhelm
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Borders Group, Inc.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Borders Group,
Inc. and will be retained by Borders Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IRONBURG INVENTIONS LTD, 

Plaintiff,

v.

BATTLE BEAVER, LLC,

 Defendant.

Case No.: 3:22-CV-00686-X

Hon. Brantley Starr

DEFENDANT’S STATEMENT PURSUANT 

TO FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, Defendant Battle Beaver, LLC (“Battle Beaver”) 

respectfully states that there is no parent corporation or publicly held corporation owning 10% or 

more of its stock.

DATED: April 13, 2022

Case 3:22-cv-00686-X Document 13 Filed 04/13/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 418
/s/ William T. Reid, IV

William T. Reid, IV (TX No. 00788817)

wreid@reidcollins.com

Gregory S. Schwegmann (admission pending)

gschwegmann@reidcollins.com

Jeremy H. Wells (admission pending)

jwells@rctlegal.com

REID COLLINS & TSAI LLP

1301 S Capital of Texas Hwy 

Building C, Suite 300

Austin, Texas 78746

T: 512.647.6100

F: 512.647.6129

J. Benjamin King (TX No. 24046217)

bking@reidcollins.com

REID COLLINS & TSAI LLP

1601 Elm Street, Suite 4200

Dallas, Texas 75201

T: 214.420.8902

F: 214.420.8909

Counsel for Defendant Battle Beaver, LLC

Case 3:22-cv-00686-X Document 13 Filed 04/13/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 419
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 18 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 18

   Expressing the sense of Congress that the laws that apply to the 
private sector and the other branches of the Federal Government should 
                           apply to Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 1993

  Mr. Goss (for himself, Mr. Shays, Mr. Petri, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. 
  Sensenbrenner, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Hefley, and Mr. Klug) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress that the laws that apply to the 
private sector and the other branches of the Federal Government should 
                           apply to Congress.

Whereas the declining credibility of Congress has affected the spirit of our 
        Nation;
Whereas an increasing number of American people perceive Members of Congress as 
        placing their interests before those of the Nation;
Whereas Congress has notably exempted itself from major laws governing the 
        private sector and the other branches of the Federal Government; and
Whereas Congress might enact more workable laws if those laws also applied to 
        Congress itself: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that Congress is not exempt from the 
laws that it enacts and should govern itself according to the laws that 
apply to the private sector and the other branches of the Federal 
Government.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28762]



[[Page 67347]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DoC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following information 
collection under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 5).
    Agency: Economic Development Administration (EDA).
    Title: Award for Excellence in Economic Development.
    Agency Form Number: Not applicable.
    OMB Approval Number: 0610-0097.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden: 150 hours.
    Average Hours Per Response: 3.
    Number of Respondents: Approximately 50 respondents.
    Needs and Uses: EDA provides a broad range of economic development 
assistance to help distressed communities design and implement 
effective economic development strategies. Part of this assistance 
includes disseminating information about best practices and encouraging 
collegial learning among economic development practitioners. EDA has 
created the Award for Excellence in Economic Development to recognize 
outstanding economic development activities of national importance. In 
order to make Awards for Excellence in Economic Development, EDA must 
collect two kinds of information: (a) Information identifying the 
nominee and contacts within the organization being nominated and (b) 
information explaining why the nominee should be given the award. The 
information will be used to determine those applicants best meeting the 
preannounced selection criteria. Use of a nomination form standardizes 
and limits the information collected as part of the nomination process. 
This makes the competition fair and eases any burden on applicants and 
reviewers alike. Participation in the competition is voluntary. The 
award is strictly honorary.
    Affected Public: State, local or Tribal Government and not-for 
profit organizations.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Madeleine Clayton, Departmental Forms Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-3129, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 6086, 14th 
and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.

    Dated: November 3, 2000.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-28762 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-34-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              The Schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from the financial
                              statements for Independence Tax Credit Plus L.P.
                              IV and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                              to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000940329                          
<NAME>                        Independence Tax Credit Plus L.P. IV
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                           APR-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                    8,709,102
<SECURITIES>                             17,200,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          1,030,983
<PP&E>                                   34,924,176
<DEPRECIATION>                              820,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           62,695,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     5,499,873
<BONDS>                                  17,017,646
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                               40,177,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             62,695,144
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          1,920,978
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          1,542,178
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          556,998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (178,198)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (178,198)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (3.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        


</TABLE>