alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2887]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP99-163-000, CP99-165-000 and CP99-166-000]


Questar Southern Trails Pipeline Company; Notice of Meeting

February 3, 2000.
    Take notice that a meeting will be held in the above-docketed 
proceedings on Thursday, February 24, 2000, at 10: a.m., in a room to 
be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426. The purpose of 
the meeting is to clarify and ascertain additional information 
regarding Questar Line 90 Company's request of November 9, 1999, for an 
opinion from the General Counsel that certain prospective salvage 
activities related to Line 90 Company's oil pipeline purchased from 
ARCO Pipe Line Company are nonjurisdictional and will not require prior 
certificate authorization. Line 90 Company is also concerned that these 
activities will not prejudice Questar Southern Trails Pipeline 
Company's pending certificate application in Docket No. CP99-163-000 et 
al. to acquire (from Line 90 Company), convert, and operate the 
heretofore oil pipeline for the transportation of natural gas in 
interstate commerce.
    Specifically, all of the parties should be prepared for a 
discussion on the following questions, among others, relating to the 
requested General Counsel interpretation:
    What are the specific activities to be undertaken by Line 90 
Company with respect to the oil pipeline and why? Identify specific 
equipment/facilities.
    Would the specific activities, including removal of facilities and 
equipment, be undertaken regardless of whether the conversion of the 
oil pipeline to natural gas was planned?
    What are the ``environmental remediation obligations'' of ARCO with 
respect to the subject pipeline, and what is the reason for and nature 
of Line 90 Company's involvement in such measures? What is ARCO's 
schedule for all remaining activities associated with the oil pipeline?
    Any party, as defined in 18 CFR 385.214, and any participant, as 
defined in 18 CFR 385.102(b), in the above-captioned proceedings are 
invited to participate in the meeting. However, no topics other than 
those pertaining to the requested General Counsel opinion will be 
considered. For additional information, please contact Dennis Vasapoli 
(202) 208-0461 or Robert Christin (202) 208-1022, at the Commission.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-2887 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)             
|View History: Annual                                       
|View History: Annual                                       
|View History:                                              
|                                                           
|U.S. Foreign Crude Oil Refinery Receipts (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                           
|                                                           
|U.S. Foreign Crude Oil Refinery Receipts (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           | 1,531,221 | 1,225,381 | 1,159,520 | 1,222,771 | 1,079,612 | 1,539,378 | 1,713,091 | 1,933,997 | 2,193,468
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,252,898 | 2,209,694 | 2,319,326 | 2,539,749 | 2,542,508 | NA        | 2,748,628 | NA        | 3,128,109 | 3,210,486
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3,323,216 | 3,335,665 | 3,268,291 | 3,442,495 | 3,608,712 | 3,604,114 | 3,597,841 | 3,514,715 | 3,400,492 | 3,172,821
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3,224,988 | 3,203,108 | 3,085,499 | 2,829,492 | 2,675,819 | 2,577,265 | 2,780,462 | 2,808,653 | 2,742,760 | 2,401,961
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,046,909 | 2,106,892 | 2,242,156 | 2,312,901 |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3
                                                                     -----------



                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF
                          SKY FINANCIAL CAPITAL TRUST I


         THIS Certificate of Trust OF SKY FINANCIAL CAPITAL TRUST I (the
"Trust") is being duly executed and filed on behalf of the Trust by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a business trust under the Delaware Business
Trust Act (12 DEL.C. Section 3801 ET SEQ.) (the "Act").

         1. NAME. The name of the business trust formed by this Certificate of
Trust is Sky Financial Capital Trust I.

         2. DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust in the State of Delaware are Wilmington Trust Company, 1100 North
Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attention: Corporate Trust
Administration.

         3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon
filing with the Secretary of State.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Certificate
of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act.


                                       WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,
                                       as trustee


                                       By:
                                          --------------------------------------
                                       Name:
                                            ------------------------------------
                                       Title:
                                             -----------------------------------



                                       -----------------------------------------
                                        W. Granger Souder, Jr., as Trustee



                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Kevin T. Thompson, as Trustee



                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Michael R. Moore, as Trustee
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Indiana Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Indiana Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 33,900 | 27,900 | 27,900 | 28,900 | 28,900 | 34,200 | 34,200 | 34,200
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 33,900 | 36,900 | 36,500 | 37,350 | 32,700 | 33,700 | NA     | 35,700 | NA     | 35,700
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 37,700 | 37,700 | 37,700 | 37,700 | 37,700 | 37,700 | 37,700 | 37,700 | 37,700 | 37,700
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 37,700 | 28,000 | 33,700 | 27,200 | 27,200 | 33,200 | 33,200 | 33,200 | 33,200 | 34,200
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 34,200 | 34,200 | 34,200 | 34,400 | 34,400 |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00182-L

§

SERGIO GARCIA-HERNANDEZ (1) §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent 

of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, 

and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the 

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the 

Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and 

SERGIO GARCIA-HERNANDEZ is hereby adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5)(B) and 924(a)(2), namely, Possession 

of a Firearm by a Prohibited Person to wit: an Illegal Alien. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's 

scheduling order.

☒ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court accepts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence that the 

defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released and should therefore 

be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions 

of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the defendant is likely to flee or pose a 

danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of whether it has 

been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be 

detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is 

not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This 

matter shall be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

SIGNED this 12th day of August, 2022.

________________________________________

SAM A. LINDSAY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00182-L Document 29 Filed 08/12/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 55
Case 5:22-cr-00032-H-BQ Document 30 Filed 10/12/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 62
Case 5:22-cr-00032-H-BQ Document 30 Filed 10/12/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 63
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6030

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL ALLEN KOKOSKI,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Elizabeth V. Hallanan,

Senior District Judge. (CR-92-90; CA-01-944-5)

Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 19, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Allen Kokoski, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael Allen Kokoski seeks to appeal the district

court’s orders accepting the report and recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and denying relief on his motion to

reconsider filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). An appeal may

not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Kokoski has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We also deny Kokoski’s motion to permit access

to the court and his motion for bail pending appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Case 2:22-cv-00094-Z Document 70 Filed 07/21/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 743
Case 2:22-cv-00094-Z Document 70 Filed 07/21/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 744
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28600]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR


Minerals Management Service

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: Availability of Revised Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Official 
Protraction Diagram.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that effective with this publication, 
the following NAD 27-based OCS Official Protraction Diagram last 
revised on the date indicated, is on file and available for information 
only, in the Gulf of Mexico OCS Regional Office, New Orleans, 
Louisiana. In accordance with Title 43, Code of Federal Regulations, 
this diagram is the basic record for the description of minerals and 
oil and gas lease sales in the geographic area it represents.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Description                              Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NG15-09, Amery Terrace.................  Oct. 25, 2000.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of Leasing Maps and Official 
Protraction Diagrams are $2.00 each. These may be purchased from the 
Public Information Unit, Information Services Section, Gulf of Mexico 
OCS Region, Minerals Management Service, 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard, 
New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394, Telephone (504) 736-2519.

    Dated: November 2, 2000.
Thomas A. Readinger,
Acting Associate Director for Offshore Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 00-28600 Filed 11-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 299 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 299

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 7 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the printing of the book entitled ``Hispanic Americans in 
                              Congress''.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the book entitled ``Hispanic Americans in Congress'', prepared 
under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing, shall be 
printed as a House document, with illustrations and suitable binding.
    Sec. 2. In addition to the usual number, there shall be printed, 
for the use of the Joint Committee on Printing, the lesser of--
            (1) 25,000 copies of the document; or
            (2) such number of copies of the document as does not 
        exceed a total production and printing cost of $110,000.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 7 (legislative 
      day, October 6), 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Joe EDWARDS v. STATE.

No. 24365.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 4, 1949.

None on appeal for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, (for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The judgment in this .case is void for the same reason as that shown in the opinion in Cause No. 24364 against the appellant, 219 S.W.2d 1022.

For the. reason there expressed, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FT.WORTH DIVISION

§

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

Robert "Bob" Ross

Plaintiff, 

V. 

DIVERSIFIED CREDIT SYSTEMS,

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL 

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, JULIE

HEDRICK, ERIK HARRIS,

Defendants.

§

AFFIDAVIT OF EUGENIO VARGAS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S

ORIGINAL PETITION AND MOTION TO VACATE

BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Eugenio 

Vargus, who being by me first duly sworn, did state: 

1. "I am employed as a Flight Attendant working with American Airlines,

Inc. and I served as the National Treasurer for the Association of

Professional Flight Attendants ("APFA"), from April 1, 2016 to July 1,

2018. I have personal knowledge of the fact, I am 21 years or older and

of sound mind to make these statements.

a. During my administration of my duties as National Treasurer, it was

my responsibility to review all incoming charges, expenses and

receipts of the APFA National President. It was my responsibility to

raise any concern and forward any charge or receipt with which I

questioned as to whether it was a valid business-related expense,

1 of 3

Exhibit E

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 86-5 Filed 04/08/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID 1920
2 of 3

back to the individual for a more detailed explanation prior to 

granting approval or denial. 

b. At that time I served with Robert “Bob” Ross (“Ross”) as the National

President of APFA. Any charges made by Ross, that I questioned

were cleared and all questions rectified. Any of Ross’s union credit

card charges, expenses and receipts that I reviewed and approved

were in compliance with APFA policy at the time of approval.

c. Charges made by Robert “Bob” Ross never gave rise to any suspicion

of theft, misappropriation, or breach of his fiduciary duty, or conduct

unbecoming an APFA officer whatsoever.

d. On or about May 25, 2018, I had a conversation with Robert (Bob)

Ross regarding any outstanding charges that should be repaid to

APFA. I informed him the charges made for his furniture for the

APFA apartment should be repaid. He authorized me to contact

APFA payroll and have the expenses of $3637.92 - $331.28 (deduction

for returned furniture) deducted from his payroll, which I sent an

email to payroll to have these funds deducted.

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.

_______________________________ 

Eugenio Vargus

Eugenio Vargas who produced Texas drivers license as 

identification 

Exhibit E

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 86-5 Filed 04/08/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID 1921
3 of 3

SWORN AND SUBSCRIBED TO before me on this _____ day of April, 2022. 

________________________________ 

Notary Public, State of Texas

17th 

Remote Online Notary Public 

State of Texas, Jefferson County 

KBA online using audio video communication 

Exhibit E

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 86-5 Filed 04/08/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID 1922
#### HAIRSTON v. STATE.

No. 24226.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 6, 1949.

Lane & Anderson, of Center, for appellant. . ,

Ernest S. Goens, State’s. Atty., of Austin, for the State. .

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

On the 23rd day of March, 1949, the judgment of conviction was reversed' and the cause -remanded. It is ‘ now made to appear by proper affidavit that appellant was dead at the time said order of reversal was entered, having -died on the 14th -day *1007of March, 1949. This court was not apprised of appellant's death until the State’s motion to abate the appeal, accompanied by proof of death, was filed on the 29th day of March, 1949.

The opinion reversing the judgment of conviction is withdrawn, and the State’s motion is sustained and the appeal is abated.