alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6752
KEITH D. WILSON, Petitioner - Appellant,
v. DON WOOD, Superintendent; THEODIS BECK, Secretary of Corrections, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cv-00408-WO-WWD) Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 22, 2008 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith D. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Keith D. Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his second Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The notice of appeal was received in the district court shortly after expiration of the appeal period. Because Wilson is incarcerated, the notice is considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). The record is ambiguous as to when Wilson gave the notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this information from the parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack . The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. REMANDED
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Illinois Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Illinois Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 8      | 8      | 8      | 8      | 7      | 7      | 7      | 6     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 6      | 7      | 7      | 7      | 7      | 7      | NA     | 6      | NA     | 6     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 6      | 6      | 5      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

CHARLES EDWARD SCOTT, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00362-O-BP

 §

FORT WORTH HOMELESS §

SHELTER, § 

 §

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a 

Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s

Recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District 

Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and 

they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 

SO ORDERED on this 21st day of June, 2022. 

Case 4:22-cv-00362-O Document 7 Filed 06/21/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 19
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8090
In re: JOSE ELIECER LONDONO, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-87-321-A) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 9, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jose Eliecer Londono, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jose Eliecer Londono brought this mandamus petition seeking an order compelling the clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to forward the record on appeal in United States v. Londono , No. 94-7462 (CR-87-321-A), to this court. Because we note that the clerk of this court received and filed the record on appeal shortly after Londono filed this petition, we conclude that petitioner has already received the relief he seeks. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Case 3:22-cv-00983-S Document 12 Filed 10/05/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 50
r 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
Honorable George FL Sheppard, Page 2 

that when oil la found upon which the tax therein provided for 

has not beeh paid, any sheriff or other peace officer is authorized 

to levy on said 011 by notice to the owner or other persons in 

charge that said oil is levied on for taxes due on it, and after 

ten day8 notice posted at the slto of the 013 said offloera shall 

proceed to sell said oil to the highest bidder for cash to effect 

a colleotlon of said taxes. 

Subaeotion % of Section 1 of said article defines a first 

purchaser as any person purchasing orude oil from the producer. 

%e understand from your letter that the Cordoia Gathering System 

is In the busirlese of gathering and purchasing crude oil fW 

the produamr. ft is thererare the opinion of this Departaent, 

that u 8u6h purohaaer it 5.8 liable to pay the goat prodPotIon 

tu on the oil rhloh It purebaae8, but ia ontitled to deduat au& 

tuo8 _ironr the pa-r& to tbo pmduou. It 18 the respolufbillty 

of the Cordova Gat!avrlng Sy8tu to datermina who the produoar of 

thin overqp oil ie, a8 the State is entitled to ita tam8 on all 

oil produmb and the first pmrahusnr baa tbs napoa8ibllity or 

~~~~aoth" 06q+@.lerand mst leek to tbs .prodmor 

The ract that '&ho pumbaur inoorrutl~ muga 

tin oil ulimn it f&us it iato it8 plpa lines will not d&oat the 

8tak'S tam*. 

ft uus that the Cordova 

it&or, own 8ooh oil it ia br roamaS b6ilw tha purohirr 

tbm0r 0-n tw tha 8eller 18 asknoon ana srrn tbowh the 

wllar ha8 never been.pald ror It, and as auoh prvehrur it lm 

liable to the Stat* iOr the &roaa production tUw8 tbXW3b 

Eoping that this -18 ptw queatioa, we are 

Very traly yaurn 

ATTORRfPPGRRERAL OP‘Pl!XAS 

D. D. Mahon 

ASSISTANT 

APPROVED 

OPlNlON 0 COMMI’I-EE 

svWtr 6”A\l”nA”
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 105

Providing for the appointment of Hanna Holburn Gray as a citizen regent

of the Smithsonian Institution.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1993

Mr. MINETA (for himself, Mr. NATCHER, and Mr. MCDADE) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House

Administration

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the appointment of Hanna Holburn Gray as

a citizen regent of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in

6 the class other than Members of Congress, be filled by

7 the appointment of Hanna Holburn Gray of Illinois. The

8 appointment is for a term of six years and shall take effect

9 upon the date of enactment.

Æ
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|U.S. Foreign Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Truck (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|U.S. Foreign Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Truck (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        | 1,113  | 2,168  | 2,752  | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 8      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | NA     | 0      | NA     | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 50     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 4      | 0      | 331    | 0      | 0      | 85    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 132    | 133    | 162    | 129    |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28837]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Boston Harbor Islands Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) that the Boston Harbor Islands Advisory 
Council will meet on Wednesday, December 6, 2000. The meeting will 
convene at 4:00 p.m. at the New England Aquarium Education Center, Long 
Wharf, Boston, Massachusetts.
    The Advisory Council was appointed by the Director of National Park 
Service pursuant to Public Law 104-333. The 28 members represent 
business, educational, cultural, and environmental entities; 
municipalities surrounding Boston Harbor; Boston Harbor advocates; and 
Native American interests. The purpose of the Council is to advise and 
make recommendations to the Boston Harbor Islands Partnership with 
respect to the development and implementation of a management plan and 
the operation of the Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area.
    The Agenda for this meeting is as follows:

1. Approval of minutes from September 6, 2000
2. Discussion regarding the park operations ``report card''
3. Discussion on water transportation issues

    The meeting is open to the public. Further information concerning 
Council meetings may be obtained from the Superintendent, Boston Harbor 
Islands. Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the 
Council or file written statements. Such requests should be made at 
least seven days prior to the meeting to: Superintendent, Boston Harbor 
Islands NRA, 408 Atlantic Ave., Boston, MA, 02110, telephone (617) 223-
8667.

    Dated: November 1, 2000.
George E. Price, Jr.,
Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands NRA.
[FR Doc. 00-28837 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 215 (Monday, November 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28398]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in civil and Mechanical Systems; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and Mechanical Systems 
(1205).
    Date and Time: December 4-5, 2000; 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Rooms 340 & 390, Arlington, 
Virginia.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Richard Fragaszy, Program Director, 
Geomechanics and Geotechnical Systems, Division of Civil and 
Mechanical Systems, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Room 545, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8360.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate nominations for the FY'01 
Unsolicited Review Panel as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 31, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-28398 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ROSALBA SANCHEZ,

Plaintiff,

VS.

METHODIST HOSPITAL,

Defendant.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:22-CV-0998-G-BT

)

)

)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this

case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge dated June 7, 2022, the court finds that the findings and

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. 

SO ORDERED.

June 29, 2022.

________________________________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-00998-G-BT Document 9 Filed 06/29/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 29
{"agency":"Treasury","generated":"2014-09-03 10:33:18","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"}],"value":"2014"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["BEP","BPD","DO","FinCEN","FMS","IRS","MINT","OCC","TIGTA","TTB"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["23"," ","194","75","71","2335","32","428","71","11"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["27"," ","164","71","64","2372","35","428","48","7"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":[" "," ","314"," "," ","229"," ","6","16"," "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2014","quarter":"Q2"}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0596

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH JOHN MCNAMARA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 29, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 22 2021

10/22/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0596
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 32

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

05/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
#### GRIFFIN v. GRIFFIN et al.

No. 6522.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

Oct. 19, 1950.

*968Musslewhite & Fenley, Lufkin, Gladney & Stephen, Henderson, for appellant.

H. H. Wellborn, Henderson, Lane, Hall & Lane, Marshall, for appellees.

HALL, 'Chief Justice.

Mrs. Gussie Griffin, appellant, filed for probate in the County Court of Rusk County the will of her deceased husband, W. T. Griffin, and appellees-, R. M. Griffin and others, children of W. T. Griffin and his first wife, filed their contest thereto. Upon a hearing the county court refused to admit the will to probate and the appellant appealed her case to the District Court of Rusk -County. Appellees filed a motion in the district -court to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the citation issued out of the county court was void in that it was directed “To the Sheriff or any Constable of Rusk County,” instead of “to any sheriff or any constable within the State of Texas,” as required by Rule 15, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Appellees also filed a motion to dismiss the appeal to the district court for insufficient sureties on the appeal bond. Upon a hearing both motions were granted. Appellant was permitted, however, to amend her appeal bond by securing proper sureties within 20 days from and after January 14, 1950. Appellant complied with this requirement by filing her amended appeal bond which was approved by the -county judge, county clerk and district clerk of Rusk County on January 15,1950.

The action of the district court in dismissing the appeal from the county court on account of the citation out of the latter court being addressed to the sheriff or any constable of Rusk County instead of any sheriff or 'any constable of the State of Texas, forms the basis of this appeal.

It is now -clear, by reason of a recent opinion by the Supreme Court hereafter noted, that this action of the trial court presents error. Since the entry of the judgment in the trial court the Supreme Court has handed down the opinion in Nass v. Nass, Tex.Sup., 228 S.W.2d 130, dated March 8, 1950, which sets at rest the question here involved respecting the sufficiency of the citation. That case holds that such citation is sufficient. It is not necessary to quote from that decision but we sim-ply call attention to the holding therein. The action of the trial court in permitting appellant to -amend her appeal bond is sustained. The motion of appellees in this court to dismiss the appeal is overruled. Because of the error set out above, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court.