alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|U.S. Domestic Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Tanker (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|U.S. Domestic Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Tanker (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         | 456,925 | 490,475 | 472,808 | 518,990 | 525,864 | 558,427 | 608,923 | 651,721 | 588,793
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 592,692 | 625,023 | 609,447 | 522,010 | 509,015 | NA      | 482,840 | NA      | 424,939 | 337,653
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 324,514 | 336,937 | 338,963 | 333,704 | 308,487 | 304,013 | 256,696 | 256,808 | 237,369 | 240,653
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 211,561 | 210,024 | 193,154 | 246,930 | 307,368 | 328,510 | 218,948 | 215,445 | 232,301 | 232,671
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 211,031 | 185,343 | 223,019 | 216,165 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
., ' ·it. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT . .':: ·•·-: :. ~:._·;: ;:_ ;: r,: l · : · ··• ·1 

FORTHENORTHERNDISTRICTOFTEXAS ·-··-· _. ,, ,.,." ·' 

LUBBOCK DIVISION 2022 JUN I O Ar-1 11: / I 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CEPUTY CLERK~ 

v. CASE NO. 5:22-CR-048-H-BQ-1 

DEVIN SCOTT LEAMON 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA 

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

This case has been referred by the United States district judge to the undersigned 

for the taking of a guilty plea. The parties have consented to appear before a United States 

magistrate judge for these purposes. This Report and Recommendation on Plea is submitted 

to the court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). 

The defendant appeared with counsel before the undersigned United States 

magistrate judge, who addressed the defendant personally in open court and informed the 

defendant of, and determined that the defendant understood, the admonitions contained in 

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

The defendant pleaded guilty (under a written plea bargain agreement with the 

government) to Counts One of the Indictment, charging defendant with a violation of 

18 U.S.C. § 751(a), that is, Escape from Federal Custody, and Count Two, charging a 

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472, that is, Possession of Counterfeit Obligations or Securities. 

After examining Defendant under oath the undersigned magistrate judge finds the 

following: 

1. Defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing 

to enter this guilty plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final 

Case 5:22-cr-00048-H-BQ Document 28 Filed 06/10/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 52
approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge; 

2. Defendant fully understands the nature of the charges (including each 

essential element of the offense(s) charged) and penalties; 

3. Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea 

agreement supplement; 

4. Defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes 

to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right 

to appear before a United States district judge; 

5. Defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily; 

6. Defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; 

7. There is a factual basis for this plea; and 

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of 

guilty. 

Although I have conducted these proceedings and recommend acceptance of 

Defendant's plea of guilty, the United States district judge has the power to review my 

actions and possesses final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if 

Defendant has any objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he 

is required to make those known to the United States district judge within fourteen (14) 

days of today. 

Based on the above, I recommend that Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted, that 

Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. 

Signed June 10, 2022. 

. R 

UNITED STATES MAG 

Case 5:22-cr-00048-H-BQ Document 28 Filed 06/10/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 53
EXHIBIT
32.2


STATEMENT
OF EDWARD W. WILHELM,


EXECUTIVE
VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF BORDERS GROUP, INC.


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I, Edward
W. Wilhelm, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 3, 2008, of
Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that
the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Borders
Group, Inc.




















Date:
_June 6,
2008_____________________________







/s/EDWARD W. WILHELM
______________________________________


Edward W.
Wilhelm


Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Borders
Group, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

DRUE ALLEN HOLLIS,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 4:22-cv-0413-P

VALERIE ADELE WEBBER,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton made Findings, 

Conclusions, and a Recommendation (“FCR”) in this case. See ECF No. 

14. The FCR recommended the dismissal of this action due to Plaintiff’s 

failure to comply with the Court’s order to file a Complaint that complied 

with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Id. 

After the Magistrate Judge issued the FCR, Plaintiff Drue Allen 

Hollis filed a Second Amended Complaint. See ECF No. 15. Upon review, 

however, the Amended Complaint is nearly identical to the previously 

filed Complaint, which the Magistrate Judge found insufficient. 

Compare ECF No. 15, with ECF No. 5. Thus, the Court concludes that 

Plaintiff failed to adequately address the deficiencies articulated in the 

FCR. See ECF No. 14. 

Accordingly, because of Plaintiff’s failure, the Court concludes that 

Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s order to file a Complaint 

compliant with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In addition, the 

Court also notes that Plaintiff failed to comply with the Court’s June 2, 

2022 Order. See ECF No. 12. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has 

not provided good cause for these failures. The undersigned reviewed 

the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge 

Case 4:22-cv-00413-P Document 17 Filed 06/27/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 68
2

believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are 

correct. 

Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the reasoning in the Magistrate 

Judge’s FCR as its own. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims against 

Defendant in the instant action are hereby DISMISSED without 

prejudice. 

SO ORDERED on this 27th day of June, 2022.

Case 4:22-cv-00413-P Document 17 Filed 06/27/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 69
HEALTHZONE  ANNOUNCES  RETENTION OF WORLD'S LARGEST FOOD AND BEVERAGE INVESTMENT
BANK

Los Angeles, California, July 13, 2000.  Omni Nutraceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:ZONE)
announced  today  that  they  have  retained  Rabobank  International to provide
investment  banking  advice  in  connection  with  the  exploration of strategic
alternatives  for the Company.  Such alternatives could potentially include bank
debt  restructuring,  financing,  joint  ventures,  or  mergers  in  one or more
transactions.

With  more  than $290 billion in assets and 110 offices worldwide wide, Rabobank
is  the  leading  global  financial  institution  specializing  in  the food and
beverage  industry, including nutritional supplement companies.  Rabobank is one
of  the  world's  largest  mergers  and  acquisitions  business  focused on this
industry.

Klee  Irwin,  HealthZone.com's President & CEO, commented, "We are excited about
the  prospects  that  our  new  association with Rabobank brings to the Company.
They  are  a  major  international  player  and  have  facilitated financing and
numerous  mergers  and acquisitions in the industry.  We look forward to working
with  them  to  reach  our  goals."

Omni  Nutraceuticals,  Inc.  is  a  leading  formulator  and supplier of natural
health, herbal and nutritional supplement products for consumers, and is a proud
member  of  The  Organic  Trade  Association,  Sustain,  United  Plant  Savers,
Physicians  Committee  of  Responsible  Medicine,  American Preventative Medical
Association,  etc.  Its  product lines include popular brand name market leaders
such  as  Diet  System  Six(TM),  Nature's  Secret  , Harmony Formulas , Applied
Nutrition  ,  Dr.  Linus  Pauling  Vitamins  ,  Lifestyle  Control Formulas(TM),
Inholtra  ,  151 Energy Bar(TM), Cholestaid(TM), Veromax(TM), etc. The company's
products  are sold in specialty natural health, nutrition and food retail stores
worldwide.  HealthZone.com,  the  company's  leading Internet based distribution
channel,  was  the  first  major  on-line retailer of supplements. This Internet
company sells over 16,000 health related products to consumers around the globe.

Information  and  statements  in this report, other than historical information,
should  be  considered forward-looking and reflect management's current views of
future  events  and  financial  performance  that  involve a number of risks and
uncertainties.  Factors  that  could  cause  actual results to differ materially
include,  but are not limited to, the following: general economic conditions and
developments  within  the  Internet and Intranet industries; product development
and  technology  changes; competition and pricing pressures; length of the sales
cycle;  variability  of  sales  order  flow  and  management  growth.

Investor  Relations:  John  Liviakis,  president  of  Liviakis  Financial
Communications,  Inc.,  415.389.4670  /  415.389.4694
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Power & Equipment Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, C.Dean
McLain, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.





                                         /s/ C. Dean McLain
                                         ------------------------------
                                         Name: C.Dean McLain
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         Date: February 27, 2004




         A signed original of the written statements required by Section 906 has
been provided to Western Power & Equipment Corp. and will be retained by Western
Power & Equipment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Celyad SA (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick Jeanmart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 7, 2016                                                                 
|                                                                                    
|/s/ Patrick Jeanmart                                                                
|Name: Patrick Jeanmart 
Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
I 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Ret Opinirm Ito 

Faroh of li 

ooatmat 8X 

FaryaFh 3 of , in part, prariacrt 

cte frca$Our l0tt.r 88 sollowrr 

aaticn of the 8tlptiathmli in para8 ocatrsot failed to oonre$ to 

4 cf Gontrcl rap cxplnrtioo 4ett 

"1. Can the ~ceftont Boar4 of Contrd, uadar 
Eonorebls Rarry Xnox; P* 2 

2!11 

thi8 pts8Otit OOlltfllQt, l XWOi80 its OptiOa l 8 mt 

forth la yara,mqh one, lf it 80 dosire 4~14 ooatlnue. no1 and in the futare to prohare ilquor 

tu 8tacpa r0r the Tore8 Liquor Coatrol Mard fros 

the Steak Cmpoay of Au8tln at the price stlpulatcd in the oontmot? 

"2. Tf your answer to the abcte qur6tloa should 

be 'ym', please cldvlsa us lf tha bon4 attached to 

thl6 Oont~Ot roll1 OOntinUi! in f0m0 nad effeot aa 

h&aft the Rxe4 parahnses stmps under thio aon- 

. 

'3. Ir your mawer to our first quostlon should 

be *no*, plearre advise us tb date uh.lch this eontmot oxplr6s.~ 

A &mr?ul ooluidoration of thir oontruot loares no 

doubt but that It wU8 EBQO Under the ruthoritp of, end in OOLPI 

pllcmas rltb Tltls 20, Ctzapter 2, Vornon*m Fieiiard Civil Gtotutos, 1925, whloh aufhWit*8 t2e kxa’4 of Control ti @x&r 

acntmots tor printing an4 the gwohaae 02 SIBAlar 8upplloa. 

Article 806, ‘r’bmon’o Ize?Lsed Cl011 btatUtO8, 1925, which is 

part of Title EO, Chapter 2~. aupra, in port, prorldes: 

Vho Bbard ahell oontraot for 8 t&as of not 

etcoadlng two pm%. . . . for sugplylng to the 

Etdte all print&E:, birding, stationary, an4 supplle6 of like charaOter.a 

?&era mm parson or boar4 is l gpointod 'bt lm a8 

the aceat of the fitate for the purpcss of letting ocntraot8, 

the law Mdar rshloh suoh psreon or bourd aata 18 a8 cuoh 4 

Bert of the contrarat as if it were iorcally tranecribad there- 

%A 427 2a5 88 20. 59 Corpus JUAS 171: 

hill v. &erloan Isook Coo~any (Sup. Ct. tit: 

(Ct. Cir: App. cf T&c., 

%iObO18*;. 

1926) 171 

ttato 

lees) 11 mr. Clv. &p. se?, SE SE 

452, writ of error refused; State T. fcrletela (Ct. MY. App. 

of Ter., 1924) 78 SX (a4) l.W, writ of error dl8nlssed. Since 

there $8 no tendnation date rtlpulntad in the ooa:raot bo- 

.Coro us, we nust z-e&d the above quoted protielon of Article 

bbc), supra, into the codzuat and hold that It ox&ad tat0 yo+?rll 

im the data of cxt?a~tiah. 

Paragraph I ot thle contract bound the Steak Corn-- 

pony to furnieh ttmaty-rim rilllon (~,OOO,OOO) liqucr tar: 
. 

Eonornbh Barry Xnos, Page s 

* . 

.- 

2.32 

stffipr. St further provided for a?~ option rshiah gavei thm 

:F;; the rl$st to puroh46r addition4l btncps, if it 80 deThis optloa, balng a part OS the oontrsot, oould 

ha-6 kmt nothinrr smo than that the St&o E;l&t muabase 

&&pt In excess of the 8tlpuletsd twsnty-five-clliion 

(~,OOO,OOO) (if it so dsolred) durlnz the tima that thr 

oOntraot was in dreot. The oostraot h4vlnu tmainrtea two 

vrmrs fro= the date of its ereoutlon. the o&on neosoaarlly 

thS OriniOn Or this 

manot now be pirohas36 am ratuminq to you harowlth the orlglanl oontmot ou!xzlttad tc us w:t!: your lottar of hpril 25, 1940. 

ATTORNEY GEN%UL OB TEXAS
# QSBL 123115

# QSBL 093015

# QSBL 063015

# QSBL 033115

# QSBL 123114

# QSBL 093014

# QSBL 063014

# QSBL 033114

# QSBL 123113

# QSBL 093013

# QSBL 063013

# QSBL 033113

# QSBL 123112

# QSBL 093012

# QSBL 063012

# QSBL 033112

# QSBL 123111

# QSBL 093011

# QSBL 063011

# QSBL 033111

# image1.png
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00753

- CR

Sherri Dee BUCHANS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR7558

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 15 , 2015.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Department of the Treasury 

Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture 

DATE: _ _ / / _
 

Treasury Agency: _____________________
 

Case Number: ________________________
 

Case Name: __________________________
 

Treasury Forfeiture Fund
 

Member Agency Obligation Request Form
 

This form is to be used by the TFF agencies to request an obligation on forfeited funds or proceeds of sale of forfeited property due to 

granted petitions, restoration, or other ordered refunds pursuant to the Guidelines for Treasury Forfeiture Fund Agencies on Refunds 

Pursuant to Court Orders, Petitions for Remission, or Restoration Requests. This form and supporting documentation must be 

emailed to your Agency's Headquarters Office. 

Seizure Number(s) Cash Receipt 

(CR) # 

Sale Number 

(if applicable) Amount Forfeited Collect Date (ColDte) 

Forfeiture 

Date 

DCR Date 

(ProDte) Liability Amount Amount to be 

Obligated 

 Anticipated Liability 

to Retain

 $ - $ - $ - $ -

$ - $ - $ - $ -

$ - $ - $ - $ -

$ - $ - $ - $ -

$ - $ - $ - $ -

$ - $ - $ - $ -

$ - $ - $ - $ -

$ - $ - $ - $ -

$ - $ - $ - $ -

TOTALS: $ - $ - $ - $ -

Reason for Obligation Request: 

Petition for Remission or Mitigation of Forfeiture Granted (Attach a copy of ruling letter) 

Restoration Request Granted (Attach copy of ruling letter) 

Court-Ordered Payment or other Refund Paymented Ordered or Required from the TFF (Attach copy of Order) 

FOR TEOAF USE ONLY
 

FUND__________________ ORDER: 

FUND CENTER: __________________ COST CENTER: 

FUNCTIONAL AREA: __________________ MATERIAL GROUP: __________________ SIGNATURE: ________________________ 

DATE:_______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28874]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of the Census

[Docket Number 001102308-0308-01]
RIN Number 0607-XX58


2000 Company Organization Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of the Census, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Determination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Census Bureau is conducting the 2000 Company 
Organization Survey. The survey's data are needed, in part, to update 
the multiestablishment companies in the Business Register. The survey, 
which has been conducted annually since 1974, is designed to collect 
information on the number of employees, payroll, geographic location, 
current operational status, and kind of business for the establishments 
of multilocation companies. We have determined that annual data 
collected from this survey are needed to aid the efficient performance 
of essential governmental functions and have significant application to 
the needs of the public and industry. The data derived from this survey 
are not available from any other source.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Hanczaryk, Economic Planning and 
Coordination Division, U.S. Census Bureau, Room 2747, Federal Building 
3, Washington, DC 20233-6100, telephone (301) 457-4058.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title 13, United States Code (U.S.C.), 
Sections 182, 195, 224, and 225, authorize the Census Bureau to 
undertake surveys necessary to furnish current data on the subjects 
covered by the major censuses. This survey will provide continuing and 
timely national statistical data for the period between economic 
censuses. The next economic censuses will be conducted for the year 
2002. The data collected in this survey will be within the general 
scope, type, and character of those that are covered in the economic 
censuses.
    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required 
to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure 
to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) unless that collection of 
information displays a current valid Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) control number. In accordance with the PRA, 44 U.S.C., Chapter 
35, the OMB approved the survey on November 3, 1999, under OMB control 
Number 0607-0444. We will furnish report forms to organizations 
included in the survey, and additional copies are available on written 
request to the Director, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC 20233-0101.
    I have, therefore, directed that the 2000 Company Organization 
Survey be conducted for the purpose of collecting these data.

    Dated: November 3, 2000.
Kenneth Prewitt,
Director, Bureau of the Census.
[FR Doc. 00-28874 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P