alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1








STATEMENT
OF GEORGE L. JONES,


PRESIDENT
AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF BORDERS GROUP, INC.


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I, George
L. Jones, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 3, 2008, of
Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that
the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Borders
Group, Inc.




















Date:
_June 6,
2008______________________







/s/GEORGE L. JONES
________________________________


George L.
Jones


President
and Chief Executive Officer


Borders
Group, Inc.
Empire State D e v e I o p m e n t i:'^^'IpRMTION 

Augusti,201 1 ^ ••• -••• •^•-^'••''•'OPERATIONS ^ • 

Ms. Aloha Ley .. . ' ; 

Associate Director, Small Community Program 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

8'" Floor, Room W86-310 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Niagara County Department of Economic Development 

Small Community Air Service Development Program Grant Application 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

On behalf of the Empire State Development Corporation, I am writing in support of the Niagara 

County Department of Economic Development's (NCDED) grant funding application for the US 

Department of Transportation - Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP). 

The NCDED proposes to request funds designed to provide financial tools that will supplement 

the Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority's mission to enhance air service operations and 

marketing pf the Niagara Falls International Airport (NFIA). 

The NFIA is ideally suited and strategically located to accommodate various types of aviation 

operations suited for business and leisure use. The close proximity of the airport to the 

Canada/USA border, its location just off a major highway, and its central location to the Canada 

and USA population base, offer great economic advantages. Significant developments and 

investments have been made at the NFIA. This has generated private investment throughout 

the community and has secured additional transportation needs and opportunities. Grant 

funding from the SCASDP is desired to ensure the continued air service development at NFIA 

and its spinoff economic development benefits to our region. 

The local stakeholder community and airport cannot completely fund their marketing agenda 

and operational needs. Federal assistance is needed to complete this important task. A federal 

grant award will help expand the airport, bring importance to the community and provide 

additional transportation choices, while enhancing economic competiveness. 

I am confident that the NCDED grant request will greatly improve the NFIA throughout the 

region and act as a model initiative to assist future airlines to invest throughout our community, 

benefiting both stakeholders and tourists to our region. I ask that this grant application be 

given very careful consideration. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Christina P. Orsi, Regional Director 

cc: Sam Ferfaro. NCDED^ 

Empire 3tate Development 

95 Perry Street Suite SOO Buffalo fiew York 14203-3030 

lel 716 346 3200 hix /16 346 8260 V/ebsife .v .vw.emoirs.state.ny.us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

§

 Plaintiff §

§

§

 v. § Case No.

§

§

§

 Defendant §

APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

(Complete all questions; indicate “N/A” if necessary.)

I. Applicant is an attorney and a member of the law firm of (or practices under the name of)

 , with offices at

(Street Address)

(City) (State) (Zip Code)

(Telephone No.) (Fax No.)

II. Applicant will sign all filings with the name .

III. Applicant has been retained personally or as a member of the above-named firm by:

(List All Parties Represented)

to provide legal representation in connection with the above-styled matter now pending before the United

States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

ASSSOCIATOIN OF PROFESSIONAL FLIGHT

ATTENDANTS, JULIE HEDRICK AND 

ERIK HARRIS

EUGENIO VARGAS

4:22-cv-00430-O

Association of Professional Flight Attendants

1004 W. Euless Boulevard

Euless TX 76040

817-540-0108 817-355-1919

Margot A. Nikitas

Association of Professional Flight Attendants, Julie Hedrick, and Erik Harris

Case 4:22-cv-00430-O Document 14 Filed 06/17/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID 172
IV. Applicant is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of the state of

 , where Applicant regularly practices law. 

Bar license number:_______________ Admission date:____________________________

Attach to this application an original certificate of good standing issued within the past 90 days from the

attorney licensing authority in a state in which you are admitted to practice (e.g., State Bar of Texas).

V. Applicant has also been admitted to practice before the following courts:

Court: Admission Date: Active or Inactive:

VI. Applicant has never involuntarily lost, temporarily or permanently, the right to practice before

any court or tribunal, or resigned in lieu of discipline, except as provided below:

VII. Applicant has never been subject to grievance proceedings or involuntary removal proceedings—

regardless of outcome—while a member of the bar of any state or federal court or tribunal that requires

admission to practice, except as provided below:

VIII. Applicant has not been charged, arrested, or convicted of a criminal offense or offenses, except

as provided below (omit minor traffic offenses):

For Court Use Only.

Bar StatusVerified:

_______________

Illinois

6309782 11/01/2012

State of Pennsylvania 11/20/2013 Active

N/A

N/A

N/A

Case 4:22-cv-00430-O Document 14 Filed 06/17/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID 173
-Y

 (Tx. Bar No. 0565560), Baab & Denison, LLP.

17th June 2022

Case 4:22-cv-00430-O Document 14 Filed 06/17/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID 174
Case 4:22-cv-00430-O Document 14 Filed 06/17/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID 175
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PAGE 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

LAND GORILLA, INC §

§

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 5:22-cv-00118-H

§

ORIGIN BANK §

§

§

Garnishee. §

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to federal rule of civil procedure 41(a)(1), Plaintiff, Land Gorilla, Inc., stipulates

to the dismissal of all its claims with prejudice. Because no claims remain in this case, it may now 

be dismissed.

Each party bears its own costs, expenses and attorney’s 

fees. DATED: June 24, 2022. 

Respectfully submitted,

THE HERMAN LAW FIRM

By: /s/ Jonathan M. Herman

Jonathan M. Herman (TX Bar No. 24052690)

Charles W. Hill (TX Bar No. 24063885)

1601 Elm Street, Suite 2002

Dallas, Texas 75201

Telephone: (214) 624-9805

Facsimile: (469) 383-3469

jherman@herman-lawfirm.com

chill@herman-lawfirm.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 5:22-cv-00118-H Document 3 Filed 06/24/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 18
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.
RAYSHALL THOMPSON , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 16

- 0645 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2010

- 158172

- 001 The Honorable Stephen P. Lynch , Judge Pro Tempore REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney's Office , Phoenix By Diane Meloche Counsel for Respondent Rayshall Thompson , Eloy Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Jennifer B. Campbell and Judge Margaret H. Downie delivered the decision of the Court. FILED 10-10-2017STATE v. THOMPSON Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Rayshall Thompson seeks review of the superior court's order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's second successive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a pet ition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 53 7, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that pet itioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 For the foregoing reasons, w e grant review and deny relief.
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 

AMERICAN SOFTWARE, INC. 

2011 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN 

WHEREAS, American Software, Inc. (the “Company”) has previously adopted the American Software, Inc. 2011 Equity Compensation Plan,
as amended (the “Plan”), reserving the right therein to amend the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has
deemed it advisable and in the best interest of the Company that the Plan be amended to increase the number of shares of Common Stock of the Company which are authorized to be issued under the Plan; 

NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the approval of the shareholders of the Company, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

1. Section 3 of the Plan is removed and replaced with the following: 

“Subject to Section 8, the total number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan is 5,000,000 and the maximum number of Stock
Appreciation Rights that may be granted is 500,000. The Shares may consist, in whole or in part, of unissued Shares or treasury Shares. The issuance of Shares or the payment of cash upon the exercise of an Award or in consideration of the
cancellation or termination of an Award shall reduce the total number of Shares available under the Plan, as applicable. Shares subject to Awards that terminate or lapse without the payment of consideration may be granted again under the Plan.”

 2. This Amendment is subject to approval by the shareholders of the Company. 

3. Except as amended herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

4. All capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Amendment have the same meanings ascribed to them in the Plan. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment, effective as of May 13, 2015. 

 

			
	AMERICAN SOFTWARE, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ James R. McGuone

		 	James R. McGuone, Secretary
4-29-2022 302052068950002 5820220429004505

EXHIBIT C

Case 3:22-cv-01165-E Document 1-3 Filed 05/27/22 Page 1 of 6 PageID 14
4-29-2022 302052068950002 5820220429004505

Case 3:22-cv-01165-E Document 1-3 Filed 05/27/22 Page 2 of 6 PageID 15
4-29-2022 302052068950002 5820220429004505

Case 3:22-cv-01165-E Document 1-3 Filed 05/27/22 Page 3 of 6 PageID 16
4-29-2022 302052068950002 5820220429004505

Case 3:22-cv-01165-E Document 1-3 Filed 05/27/22 Page 4 of 6 PageID 17
4-29-2022 302052068950002 5820220429004505

Case 3:22-cv-01165-E Document 1-3 Filed 05/27/22 Page 5 of 6 PageID 18
4-29-2022 302052068950002 5820220429004505

Case 3:22-cv-01165-E Document 1-3 Filed 05/27/22 Page 6 of 6 PageID 19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JOHN DOE,

Plaintiff,

v.

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY & 

VICTOR J. BOSCHINI, JR.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00297-O

ORDER

On April 26, 2022, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 6). The Court admitted several documents into evidence during 

the hearing. The Court ORDERS the parties to file electronic copies of all exhibits admitted during 

the hearing on the docket under seal before the end of the day. 

SO ORDERED this 27th day of April, 2022.

Case 4:22-cv-00297-O Document 36 Filed 04/27/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 597
Case 4:22-cr-00147-Y Document 25 Filed 06/29/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 42
Case 4:22-cr-00147-Y Document 25 Filed 06/29/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 43
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2015-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                     Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                     Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                     I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                     All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 
| Dated March 23, 2017 |                                               |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                 |                                               |
|                 | /s/ Brian E. Schaaf                                |
|                 | Brian E. Schaaf                                    |
|                 | Vice President and   Assistant Treasurer           |
|                 | Ford Motor Credit   Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|                 | (senior officer in   charge of servicing function) |

 

----
**EXHIBIT99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

                Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Manufacturers’ ServicesLimited (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, Robert C. Bradshaw, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, andAlbert A. Notini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

                (1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

                (2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   |            |   |   | /s/ Robert C.  Bradshaw  |
|--------|-----------------|--------|--------|--------------------------|
| Dated: | August 14, 2002 |   |   | Robert C.  Bradshaw      |
|   |            |   |   | Chief Executive  Officer |
|   |            |   |   |                     |
|   |            |   |   | /s/ Albert A.  Notini    |
| Dated: | August 14, 2002 |   |   | Albert A. Notini         |
|   |            |   |   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

1

----
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 87

Concerning economic sanctions against and diplomatic relations with the

Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 27, 1993

Mr. HUNTER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning economic sanctions against and diplomatic relations with the Government of the Socialist Republic of

Vietnam.

Whereas files discovered in early April 1993 from the archives of the former Soviet Communist Party Central

Committee reveal that since 1973 the Government of the

Socialist Republic of Vietnam has deliberately lied to officials of the United States Government with respect to the

status of Vietnamese-held American prisoners of war

from the Vietnam conflict;

Whereas the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, in violation of the Paris Peace Accords, has never

fully accounted for all American prisoners of war captured during the Vietnam conflict;
2

•HCON 87 IH

Whereas the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam

has manipulated the United States Government for political and economic gain by failing to fully account for such

prisoners of war;

Whereas the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam

has prolonged the suffering of the families of such prisoners of war by failing to fully account for such prisoners; and

Whereas in 1993 the Government of the Socialist Republic of

Vietnam continues to seek normalization of relations with

the United States Government, including an end to United States economic sanctions: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 President should not take any action to lift economic sanc4 tions or establish diplomatic relations with the Govern5 ment of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam until such gov6 ernment provides for a full accounting for all American

7 prisoners of war captured during the Vietnam conflict.

Æ
Case 2:22-cv-00094-Z Document 72 Filed 08/03/22 Page 1 of 6 PageID 778
Case 2:22-cv-00094-Z Document 72 Filed 08/03/22 Page 2 of 6 PageID 779
Case 2:22-cv-00094-Z Document 72 Filed 08/03/22 Page 3 of 6 PageID 780
Case 2:22-cv-00094-Z Document 72 Filed 08/03/22 Page 4 of 6 PageID 781
Case 2:22-cv-00094-Z Document 72 Filed 08/03/22 Page 5 of 6 PageID 782
Case 2:22-cv-00094-Z Document 72 Filed 08/03/22 Page 6 of 6 PageID 783
# Central **Contra Costa**  **Sanitary District** 

**5019 Imhoff Place,**  **Mart i** **n ez** **, Ca** **94553 (925)**  **228-9500 •**  **www .** **ce n** **tra l** **san.org**

**January 30,** **2009**

**Email: rcra-docket@epa.gov**  **Attention Docket**  **10 No.**  **EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 Advanced**  **Notice of**  **Proposed Rulemaking**  **Identification of**  **Non-Hazardous Materials**  **That Are**  **Solid Waste**  **Environmental Protection**  **Agency, Mail**  **Code 2822T**  **1200 Pennsylvania Avenue**  **NW Washington,**  **DC 20460**  **Ladies and**  **Gentlemen: FAX:**  **(925) 689-1232** 
**JAMES M.**  **KELLY Gelleral**  **Mallager KENTON**  **L. ALM**  **COl/llsel for**  **the District** 

**(5/0) 808-2000**  **ELAINE R.**  **BOEHME Secretary** **of the**  **Dis/rict**

**ADVANCED NOTICE**  **OF PROPOSED**  **RULEMAKING**

**- IDENTIFICATION**  **OF NON-HAZARDOUS**  **MATERIALS THAT**  **ARE SOLID**  **WASTE**
**- DOCKET**  **10 NO.**  **EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 Central Contra Costa**  **Sanitary District**  **(CCCSD) would**  **like to** **thank the**  **United States**  **Environmental Protection**  **Agency (EPA)** **for the**  **opportunity to**  **comment and**  **provide input**  **on the**  **Advanced Notice**  **of Proposed**  **Rulemaking (ANPRM).**  **Furthermore, we**  **acknowledge and**  **compliment the**  **EPA on**  **its efforts**  **to clarify and**  **resolve the**  **issues regarding**  **the appropriate**  **applicability of**  **the Clean**  **Air Act**  **(CAA), Sections 112**  **and 129.**  **In particular,** **we support**  **your approach**  **to explore**  **regulatory alternatives,**  **which 1)**  **maximize the**  **usefulness of**  **secondary materials,**  **2) reduce**  **or eliminate**  **discarded material,**  **and 3)**  **conserve energy**  **and reduce**  **harmful air**  **emissions. CCCSD**  **provides wastewater collection and**  **secondary wastewater**  **treatment for**  **approximately 450,000**  **people in**  **Contra Costa**  **County. The**  **treatment facility,**  **located in**  **Martinez, California,**  **has an**  **average dry**  **weather flow**  **(ADWF) capacity of**  **53.8 million**  **gallons per**  **day. A**  **process flow**  **schematic of** **the treatment**  **facility is**  **shown in**  **Attachment 1.**  **As can**  **be seen**  **from the**  **schematic, the**  **sewage sludge**  **is incinerated**  **in a**  **multiple-hearth incinerator.**  **The recovered**  **heat from**  **the incinerator produces**  **steam, which** **drives a**  **turbine/blower that**  **supplies oxygen**  **to the**  **secondary process.**  **The sludge**  **is converted**  **to ash,**  **which is**  **then combined**  **with other**  **products to**  **produce a**  **commercially available**  **soil amendment**  **product.**

**N:\POSUP\Regulatory\2009\RCRA Comment**  **Letter.doc** 

# @ **Recycled Paper**
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00155

- CR

Marvin Eugene Hudgins a/k/a Marvin

Eugene Huggins

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 1

o f Tarrant County (1204601D )

July 16, 2015

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

th e trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier