alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,444
<SECURITIES>                                    17,533
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,680
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,718
<PP&E>                                           5,033
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,028
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,857
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,028
<SALES>                                         10,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,925
<CGS>                                              110
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,563
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 528
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    890
<INCOME-TAX>                                       320
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                570
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       570
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
#### RATTLER v. STATE.

No. 25416.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 24, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; tíie penalty is á fine of $100.00.

The record is before us without a statement- of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 67652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28889]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-2424; MM Docket No. 00-88; RM-9871]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Dillsboro and Rosman, NC

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Sutton Radiocasting 
Corporation, allots Channel 237A to Dillsboro, NC, as the community's 
first local aural service. See 65 FR 34997, June 1, 2000. Channel 237A 
can be allotted to Dillsboro in compliance with the Commission's 
minimum distance separation requirements with a site restriction of 
14.5 kilometers (9 miles) southeast, at coordinates 35-15-56 NL; 83-09-
16 WL, to avoid a short-spacing to Stations WIKQ, Channel 235C, 
Greeneville, TN, and WYFC, Channel 237A, Clinton, TN. The 
counterproposal of Chase Broadcasting, Inc. to allot Channel 237A to 
Rosman, NC, as its first local aural service, is dismissed. A filing 
window for Channel 237A at Dillsboro will not be opened at this time. 
Instead, the issue of opening a filing window for this channel will be 
addressed by the Commission in a subsequent order.

DATES: Effective December 11, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-88, adopted October 10, 2000, and 
released October 27, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.


    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

47 CFR PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under North 
Carolina, is amended by adding Dillsboro, Channel 237A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-28889 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, S. James Miller, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSBof ImageWare Systems, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of thesmall business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The small business issuer’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for thesmall business issuer and have:

 

(a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

 

(b)   [Reserved]

 

(c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the small businessissuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

(d)   disclosed in this report any change in the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The small business issuer’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: | May 17, 2004 |                    | /s/ S. James Miller |
|--------|--------------|-------------------------|---------------------|
|   |         | S. James Miller         |
|   |         | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 35.11












2015 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance
(Item 1123)



Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling
and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of July 1, 2015 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance
LLC, as Trust Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian,
and Wilmington Trust, National Association as Trustee relating to the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-NXS2, Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-NXS2

(WFCM 2015-NXS2)





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors,
LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:



| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed
on behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of July 14, 2015 to December 31,
2015 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill
any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









|Certified by: | /s/ Adam Singer                |  | Date:  March 1, 2016
|------------- | ------------------------------ |  | --------------------
|              | Adam Singer, Managing Director |  |                     
|              |                                |  |
#### George E. Ventz, Plaintiff, *v.*Karl Kaltenbach et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Eagle Machine & Tool Co., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County,

April 1, 1958.

*863
      *Charles Goldberg*for plaintiff.

*Francis X. Stephens, Jr.,*for defendants.

William B. Groat, J.

In this action by a former employee of the defendants to recover the sum of $20,000 alleged to be due him under a contract of employment pursuant to which he was to be paid a salary of $150 per week plus a sum amounting to 10% of the net profits of the defendants’ business, the plaintiff served a notice to examine the defendants Karl Kaltenbach and Ludwig Schmidt before trial and to produce certain books and records for use in accordance with section 296 of the Civil Practice Act.

This motion is by the defendants to modify said notice by deleting item 5 thereof dealing with the ‘ ‘ amount of net profits earned by defendants for the period beginning with Sept. 20, 1954 and terminating June 21,1957 ”, or restricting the examination under this item until the plaintiff has established his cause of action with respect to his contractual right to be paid a percentage of the net profits earned by the defendants, and accordingly to modify the subpoena duces tecum so as to limit the use of the books and records therein specified.

The action being one at law and on contract the plaintiff is entitled to the examination under item 5 and to the production of relevant and material books and records. *(Tannenbaum*v. *Carvel,*271 App. Div. 790.) An action such as this is to be distinguished from an action in equity for an accounting in which the profits ordinarily become relevant subjects of examination only after the right to the accounting has been decreed. *(Boylan*v. *Foremost Mach. Bldrs.,*N. Y. L. J., Oct. 24, 1952, p. 934, col. 4.) The fact that the plaintiff is claimed to be in a competing business should not deprive him of the right to examine his former employers on the item in question, since no secret process is claimed. However, the court will limit the examination and the production of relevant books and records in the first instance to the subject of net profits for the period in question without requiring the defendants to disclose the names of their customers. If in the course of the examination the plaintiff should require the latter information, application to the Justice presiding at Special Term, Part II, should be made for a ruling thereon.

The examination will take place in this court on a date and time to be agreed upon by the parties in the order to be settled on t-wo days’ notice,
Exhibit 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF CATALYTICA ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.



|                             |  |                |  |                        |  
|---------------------------- |  | -------------- |  | ---------------------- | -
|Name                         |  | Jurisdiction   |  | Percentage ofOwnership |  
|GENXON Power Systems, LLC    |  | Delaware       |  | 100                    | %
|Catalytica NovoTec, Inc.     |  | Delaware       |  | 100                    | %
|CESI-SCR, Inc.               |  | Delaware       |  | 100                    | %
|CESI-Tech Technologies, Inc. |  | Delaware       |  | 100                    | %
|SCR-Tech, LLC                |  | North Carolina |  | 100                    | %
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|U.S. Refinery Other Oxygenates Shell Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|U.S. Refinery Other Oxygenates Shell Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 1,368  | 1,208  | NA     | 1,548  | NA     | 1,831 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,774  | 1,691  | 1,430  | 1,299  | 446    | 487    | 419    | 60     | 21     | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-31167 Conference Calendar
VERNON J TATUM, JR Plaintiff-Appellant
v. POLICE JURY OF CALCASIEU PARISH; AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS; TONY MANCUSO, in his capacity as Sheriff of Calcasieu Parish Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:07-CV-705 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Vernon J. Tatum, Jr., appeals the district court’s grant ofthe defendants’ motions to dismiss his complaint as prescribed. Tatum argues that the district court abused its discretion by granting him only 15 additional days to respond to the motions to dismiss instead of the 30 days he requested. The final motion to dismiss was filed on May 8, 2007. Tatum initially moved for an extension of time to respond to the motions to dismiss on June 5, United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 10, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-31167

2 2007, and he cured the final deficiency ofthat motion on July 5, 2007. As Tatum filed the motion for extension of time after the time for responding to the motions to dismiss had expired, he was required to showexcusable neglect. See F ED
. R. C IV
. P. 6(b)(1)(B). The district court granted Tatum 15 additional days tofile his response to the motion to dismiss in the middle of October 2007, and it did not rule on the motions to dismiss until November 5, 2007. Tatum had almost eight months from the filing of the final motion to dismiss to respond. Tatum, however, did not ever file a response tothe motions to dismiss in the district court, and he has still not stated what arguments hewould have raised in such a response. Tatum has not shown that the district court abused its discretion by refusing to fully grant his motion for extension of time. See Adams v. Travelers Indem. Co. of Conn., 465 F.3d 156, 161-62 (5th Cir. 2006). AFFIRMED.
1 

### Whalen, Marilyn

From: Poentis, Aaron Y CIV NAVFAC HI, EV <aaron.poentis@navy.mil>

Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 6:10 PM

To: Richard Takaba (richard.takaba@doh.haw aii.gov); roxanne.kwan@doh.hawaii.gov

Cc: steven.chang@doh.hawaii.gov; st uart.yamada@doh.hawaii.gov; Linder, Steven; Pallarino,

Bob; Lovgren, Andrew C LCDR, NAVSUP FLCP H C700; Shimabuku, June T. CIV NAVFAC

HI, EV4; Kishaba, Raelynn I CIV NAVFAC H I, EV4; Tsutsui, Bruc e O CIV NAVFAC HI,

OPHE3

Subject: RED HILL STATUS REPORT - March 10, 2015

Signed By: aaron.poentis@navy.mil

Importance: High

Hi Richard/Roxanne:

Attached are the updated information for the weekly progress report from Navy Region Hawaii, and the Fleet Logistic

Center Pearl Harbor for the week of March 10, 2015. In a process to ease reading, only sections with changes will be

annotated.

1. Preliminary Work Plan

Action complete.

2. Release Response Action Items (initiate immediately, complete as soon as practicable)

a. Action 1

‐ Provide a schedule for the ventilation of Tank 5 and an estimated date to commence the investigation

of release point(s) within Tank 5.

Action complete.

b. Action 2

‐ The rate of vertical migration for the released JP

‐ 8 free product is unknown. Information from the

previously collected basalt cores could be used for initial modeling of vertical migration. This information is necessary to

protect drinking water resources from petroleum contamination. Prepare models for petroleum JP

‐ 8 releases of 10,000,

20,000 and 30,000 gallons from points at 25% intervals from the bottom to the top of Tank 5.

No change.

c. Action 3

‐ Removal of petroleum free product from the area outside the tank will reduce downward migration of

the released JP

‐ 8 free product. Characterization of the free product plume and recovery of free product with increased

monitoring are required to address this plume.

No change.

d. Action 4

‐ Additional studies and procedures are required to address the potential and impact of any future

releases from the USTs within the Complex. This will require new financial and personnel resources to complete.

Funding for the preliminary work plan and all necessary following work is critical.

d.(1) Groundwater Monitoring Wells

No change.2 d.(2) Site Characterization

No change.

d.(3) AOC/SOW

Discussions are ongoing.

d.(4) Request for Additional Information

No change.

d.(5) BWS/USGS Groundwater Flow Study

No change.

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions.

v/r,

Aaron
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------


                                  CERTIFICATION


     By  signing  below,  each  of the  undersigned  officers  hereby  certifies
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, (i) this report fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the  information  contained in this report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Logansport Financial Corp.

     Signed this 12th day of November, 2003.



/s/ David G. Wihebrink                      /s/ Dottye Robeson
-------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer       Secretary and Treasurer






A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to  Logansport  Financial  Corp.  and
will be retained by Logansport  Financial  Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.