alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

January 29, 2015

Hon. Sheri Woodfin

District Clerk

Tom Green County Courthouse

112 West Beauregard

San Angelo, TX 76903-5850

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-13-00404-CR

Tr.Ct.No. B-07-1399-S

Style: JOHNNY FAZ LOPEZ JR. AKA JOHNNY FAZ LOPEZ v. THE STATE OF 

TEXAS

The judgment of the trial court was AFFIRMED by this Court on the 3rd day of July, 

2014. The mandate is enclosed.

Tex R. App. P. 51.2(a)(1) provides that the clerk of the trial court shall send an 

acknowledgment to the clerk of the appellate court of the receipt of the mandate. Please review 

the requirements of Tex. R. App. P. 51.2(b) regarding the issuance of a capias in cases in which 

the trial court’s judgment is affirmed and the defendant is not in custody.

Please sign the attached acknowledgment of receipt of the mandate and submit through 

the TAMES Records Submission Portal (RSP) as soon as possible.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: Hon. George E. McCrea

Hon. Kelly J. Workman-Ellis

Mr. Johnny Faz Lopez

I hereby acknowledge receipt of the mandate in cause no. 13-13-00404-CR this 

________ day of _________________, 2015.

District/County Clerk, 

By :____________________________
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-85,630-01 & WR-85,630-02

EX PARTE ROBERT EARL JACKSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 67275-01-E & 67276-01-E 

IN THE 108 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM POTTER COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two charges

of sexual assault of a child and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment in each case, with the

sentences to run consecutively. The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Jackson v.

State, Nos. 07-14-00262-CR & 07-14-00263-CR (Tex. App.—Amarillo Jul. 17, 2015) (not

designated for publication). 
2

Applicant contends, among other things, that the State violated Brady v. Maryland, by not 1

timely disclosing laboratory results while the trial court still had plenary power over the cases. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances,

additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any

means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court

may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing Applicant’s

Brady claims. The court shall make specific findings addressing whether the State disclosed the

laboratory report to Applicant in a timelymanner. The court shall make furtherfindings determining

whether the report is favorable and material to Applicant’s cases. The trial court shall also make any

other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition

of Applicant’s claims for habeas corpus relief.

These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. 

The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

 373 U.S. 83 (1963). 1
3

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: November 9, 2016

Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37,906]


Automation Technology Corp., Santa Cruz, CA; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on July 24, 2000, in response to a petition filed by a 
company official on behalf of workers at Automation Technology Corp., 
Santa Cruz, California.
    The company official who filed the original petition has requested 
that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in 
this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been 
terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 31th day of October 2000.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-29157 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the Operating Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Terry L. Stevens, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the
Operating Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ TERRY L. STEVENS                                             
|Terry L. Stevens                                                 
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
|October 6, 2006                                                  



48
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2203-007]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 F.R. 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for license amendment for the Holt Project, located on the Black Warrior River in Tuscaloosa County, Alabama and has prepared a Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) for the project.

Copies of the FEA are available for review at the Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, or by calling (202) 208-1371. The FEA may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call (202) 208-2222 for assistance).

For further information, contact Steve Kartalia at (202) 219-2942.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-28469  Filed 11-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 906**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Fritsch, President and Chief Executive Officer of Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the Operating Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ EDWARDJ.FRITSCH                                                           |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward J. FritschPresident and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner |   |
| August 13, 2008                                                     |   |

 

 

46
Case 2:22-cr-00051-Z-BR Document 29 Filed 08/10/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 68
#### WRIGHT v. STATE.

No. 26371.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 15, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant pleaded guilty before the court to the offense of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. His punishment was assessed at a fine of $50.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are found in the record. The proceedings appear to be regular.

The judgment is affirmed. .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-05-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-03-1997
<CASH>                                           5,223
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,948)
<INVENTORY>                                     15,273
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,600
<PP&E>                                          35,143
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,114)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,232
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,431
<BONDS>                                         42,354
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           134
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,232
<SALES>                                         28,412
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,412
<CGS>                                           70,603
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,603
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,673
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,667
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (58,375)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (58,375)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,375)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 11.1

                 OPEN ENVIRONMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Share
                                           
                                           

<TABLE>     
<CAPTION> 
                                          Three Months Ended March 31,
                                             1996               1995
                                          ------------      ------------    
<S>                                       <C>(Restated)      <C>(Restated)
Weighted average shares of common stock     
  outstanding                               7,478,430         4,610,560
Common stock equivalents:
  Series A Convertible Preferred Shares                         999,998
  Dilutive effect of stock options                            1,124,282
                                          ------------      ------------
                                            7,478,430         6,734,840
                                          ============      ============

Net income (loss)                         ($4,966,585)         $349,263
                                          ============      ============
                                                
Net income (loss) per share                    ($0.66)            $0.05
                                          ============      ============
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68166-68167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29070]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3471]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations:

AGENCY: ``Unseen Treasures: Imperial Russia and the New World'' United 
States Department of State.

ACTION: Amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 30, 1999, Notice was published on page 41488 of the 
Federal Register (Volume 64, Number 146) by the Department of State 
pursuant to Pub. L. 89-259 relating to the exhibition ``Unseen 
Treasures: Imperial Russia and the New World.'' That referenced Notice 
is hereby amended as follows: after the words ``on or about December 
31, 2000,'' insert the following additional language: ``and at the 
Presidio Trust Exhibition Hall, San Francisco, California, from on or 
about March 16, 2001, to on or about June 15, 2001,''.

[[Page 68167]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, 202/619-5997, and the address is United 
States Department of State, SA-44, Room 700, 301 4th Street, S.W., 
Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: November 6, 2000.
William B. Bader,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 00-29070 Filed 11-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-U
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MAI T. NGUYEN and SUMNER G. KAYE,

Appellants,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-192

[February 18, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Jaimie R. Goodman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2015-CA008448-XXXX-MB.

Jonathan J. Levy and Kendrick Almaguer of The Ticktin Law Group, 

Deerfield Beach, for appellants.

Kimberly S. Mello of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Orlando, Michele L. 

Stocker of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Joseph H. Picone 

of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of PDI, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:









1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date: January 28, 2011                                                                                     /s/ Nancy S Lurker


Name: Nancy S. Lurker


Title: Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|U.S. Domestic Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Truck (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|U.S. Domestic Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Truck (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        | 96,805 | 81,534  | 86,444  | 97,068  | 80,075  | 74,761  | 68,209  | 68,107  | 68,607 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 64,689 | 67,198 | 71,928  | 76,850  | 70,124  | NA      | 69,492  | NA      | 67,192  | 57,840 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 50,619 | 45,250 | 51,052  | 53,518  | 48,811  | 54,618  | 57,793  | 65,769  | 69,285  | 67,784 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 72,240 | 95,230 | 131,252 | 145,408 | 152,451 | 176,653 | 163,947 | 110,866 | 111,096 | 106,760
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 89,399 | 90,624 | 96,820  | 95,018  |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10679

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BENNIE EARL HUDSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:95-CV-289-A

- - - - - - - - - - February 7, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Bennie Earl Hudson appeals from the district court's

order denying his motion to vacate his sentence, filed pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 22 55. He argues that: he received ineffective

assistance of counsel; his conviction on two counts of being a

felon in possession of a firearm, under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and

924(e), violated the Double Jeopardy Clause; the sentencing court's

reliance on alleg edly uncounseled prior convictions violated his

due process rights; the court's reliance on convictions that predated § 924(e)'s enactment violated the Ex Post Facto Clause; theNo. 95-10679

-2-

court denied him allocution in violation of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32;

and the term "burglary" in § 924(e) is unconstitutionally "void for

vagueness." We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and perceive no reversible er ror. Although the district

court failed to address Hudson's ex post facto claim, this court

has reviewed and rejected an identical claim in a previous case.

See United States v. Leonard

, 868 F.2d 1393, 1399 (5th Cir. 1989),

cert

. denied

, 496 U.S. 904 (1990). Otherwise, we affirm for

essentially the reasons given by the district court. U nited States

v. Hudson , No. 4:95-CV-289-A (N.D. Tex. July 16, 1995).

Hudson's motion to supplement the record on appeal is DENIED.

AFFIRMED.