Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-43518; File No. SR-PCX-00-32] 

                    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of he Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act“) [1]                                          and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2]                                          notice is hereby given that on August 22, 2000, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (“PCX” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the PCX. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is granting accelerated approval of the proposed rule change.                 

## I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange is proposing to increase the maximum size of equity and index option contracts that may be designated for automatic execution to seventy-five contracts. 

## II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the PCX included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item III below. The PCX has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. 

### A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 

#### 1. Purpose 

                    The Exchange's Automatic Execution System (“Auto-Ex”) automatically executes public customer market and marketable limit orders within certain size parameters. PCX Rule 6.87(b) currently provides that the Options Floor Trading Committee (“OFTC”) shall determine the size of orders that are eligible to be executed through Auto-Ex. The rule further provides that although the OFTC may change the order size parameter on an issue-by-issue basis, the maximum order size for execution through Auto-Ex is fifty contracts for both equity and index options.[3]                                          The Exchange is now proposing to increase the maximum size of option orders that are eligible for automatic execution, subject to designation by the OFTC on an issue-by-issue basis, to seventy-five contracts.[4] 

                    The Exchange believes that these changes will help it to meet the changing needs of customers in the marketplace and give the Exchange better means of competing with other options exchanges for order flow, particularly in multiply traded issues. The Exchange also believes that increasing to seventy-five the number of option contracts executable through Auto-Ex will enable the Exchange to more effectively and efficiently manage increased order flow in actively traded option issues consistent with its obligations under the Act. In addition, the Exchange indicates that this increase should bring the speed and efficiency of automated execution to a greater number of retail orders. The PCX further believes that it should have flexibility to complete for order flow with other exchanges without being limited to responding to increases in automatic execution eligibility levels initiated by those other exchanges.[5] 

The Exchange represents that it believes that the increase will not expose Auto-Ex to risk of failure or operational capacity is sufficient to accommodate the increased number of automatic executions anticipated to result from implementation of this proposal. 

#### 2. Statutory Basis 

                    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b) [6]                                          of the Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(5),[7]                                          in particular, in that it is designed to facilitate transactions in securities, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to enhance competition and to protect investors and the public interest.                 

### B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition 

PCX does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. 

### C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change.

## III. Date of Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action

                    The PCX requests that the proposed rule change be given accelerated                           ( print page 69112)                        effectiveness pursuant to section 19(b)(2) [8]                                          of the Act.                

## IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect  to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the PCX. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-PCX-00-32 and should be submitted December 6, 2000.

## V. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of the Proposed Rule Change

                    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange and, in particular, the requirements of section 6 of the Act.[9]                                          Among other provisions, section 6(b)(5) of the Act requires that the rules of an exchange be designed to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating securities transactions; remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national securities system; and protect investors and the public interest.[10] 

                    Pursuant to section 19(b)(2) [11]                                          of the Act, the Commission finds good cause for approving the proposed rule change prior to the 30th day after the date of publication of notice thereof in the                     **Federal Register.**[12]                                          The Commission believes that granting accelerated approval will provide the PCX with flexibility to compete for order flow with other exchanges without being limited to responding to increases in automatic execution eligibility levels initiated by those other exchanges.[13] 

While increasing the maximum order size limit from fifty contracts to seventy-five contracts for Auto-Ex eligibility by itself does not raise concerns under the Act, the Commission believes that this increase raises collateral issues that the PCX will need to monitor and address. Increasing the maximum order size for particular option classes will make a larger number of option orders eligible for the Exchange's automatic execution system. These orders may benefit from greater speed of execution, but at the same time create greater risks for market maker participants. Market makers signed onto the Auto-Ex system will be exposed to the financial risks associated with larger-sized orders being routed through the system for automatic execution at the displayed price. When the market for the underlying security changes rapidly,it may take a few moments for the related option's price to reflect that change. In the interim, customers may submit orders that try to capture the price differential between the underlying security and the option. The larger the orders accepted through Auto-Ex, the greater the risk market makers must be willing to accept. The Commission does not believe that, because the Exchange's OFTC determines to approve orders as large as seventy-five contracts as eligible for Auto-Ex, the OFTC or any other PCX committee or officials should disengage Auto-Ex more frequently by, for example, declaring a “fast” market. Disengaging Auto-Ex can negatively affect investors by making it slower and less efficient to executive their option orders. It is the Commission's view that the Exchange, when increasing the maximum size of orders that can be sent through Auto-Ex, should not disadvantage all customers—the vast majority of which enter orders for less than seventy-five contracts—by making the Auto-Ex system less reliable.

*It is Therefore Ordered,*                     pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act,[14]                                          that the proposed change, as amended, (SR-PCX-00-32) is hereby approved on an accelerated basis.                                    

                        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.15

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             17 CFR 240.19b-4.                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                                                     *See*                         Securities Exchange Act Release No. 41823 (September 1, 1999), 64 FR 49265 (September 10, 1999) (approving PCX proposal to increase the maximum size of index and equity option orders that may be automatically executed, from twenty to fifty contracts).                    
        Back to Citation      

4.                             The Exchange notes that, pursuant to PCX Rule 6.86(g), if the OFTC determines, pursuant to PCX Rule 6.87(b), that the size of orders in an issue that are eligible to be executed on Auto-Ex will be greater than twenty contracts, then the trading crowd will be required to provide a market depth for manual (non-electronic) orders in that greater amount, as provided in PCX Rule 6.86(a).                    
        Back to Citation      

5.                                                     *See*                         PCX Rule 6.87(c) (permitting the PCX to match the maximum size of orders eligible for automatic execution that are permitted on another options exchange in multiply traded issues).                    
        Back to Citation      

6.                             15 U.S.C. 78f(b).                    
        Back to Citation      

7.                             15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).                    
        Back to Citation      

8.                             15 U.S.C. 78(b)(2).                    
        Back to Citation      

9.                             The Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).                    
        Back to Citation      

10.                             15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).                    
        Back to Citation      

11.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).                    
        Back to Citation      

12.                             In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered its impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).                    
        Back to Citation      

13.                             The Commission notes that it is concurrently approving similar proposals filed by the American Stock Exchange, LLP (“Amex”), Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. (“CBOE”), and the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (“Phlx”).                         *See*                         Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 43516 (November 3, 2000) (SR-Amex-99-45); 43517 (November 3, 2000) (SR-CBOE-99-51); and 41515 (November 3, 2000) (SR-Phlx-99-32).                    
        Back to Citation      

14.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).                    
        Back to Citation      

15.                             17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-29183  Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M