alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted), S. James Miller, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of ImageWareSystems, Inc. (the ***“Company”***),  hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.               The Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSBfor the period ended June 30, 2005 (the ***“Report”***) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of theCompany at the end of the periods covered by the Report and the results ofoperations of the Company for the periods covered by the Report.

 

 

Dated:  August 12, 2005

 

 
| /s/  S. James Miller                           |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| S.  James Miller, Jr.  Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to ImageWare Systems, Inc. and will be retained by ImageWare Systems,Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
Case 4:22-cr-00130-Y Document 21 Filed 05/04/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 27
Case 4:22-cr-00130-Y Document 21 Filed 05/04/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 28
#### RAMSEY v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 23, 1951.

J. K. Beasley, W. E. Wall, Harlan, for appellant.

A. E. Funk, Atty. Gen., Zeb A. Stewart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

CLAY, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of possessing beer for the purpose of sale in local option territory.

No evidence was introduced by the Commonwealth to show that the place of the crime was in territory where prohibition was in effect. We have held on several occasions this constitutes reversible error. See Burton et al. v. Commonwealth, 274 Ky. 655, 120 S.W.2d 213, and Sipple v. Commonwealth, 300 Ky. 725, 190 S.W.2d 354.

The Commonwealth argues, however, that in view of the fact this Court has upheld a local option election in Harlan County (where appellant was convicted) in Jackson et al. v. Bolt, 292 Ky. 503, 166 S.W.2d 831, we should take judicial notice that Harlan County is dry. However, that case was decided in 1942, and we do not have any notice, 'by our records, that Harlan County is still dry territory.

Since a proper indictment in this type of prosecution must include an allegation that the local option law is in force, it is necessary for the Commonwealth to prove this fact'at the trial.

The appeal is granted, and the judgment is reversed with directions to grant appellant a new trial.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 136 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 136

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the House from Friday, August 6, 1993, 
 Saturday, August 7, 1993, Monday, August 9, 1993, or Tuesday, August 
10, 1993, to Wednesday, September 8, 1993, and a recess or adjournment 
of the Senate from Friday, August 6, 1993, Saturday, August 7, 1993, or 
         Sunday, August 8, 1993, to Tuesday, September 7, 1993.






103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 136

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on Friday, August 6, 1993, Saturday, 
August 7, 1993, Monday, August 9, 1993, or Tuesday, August 10, 1993, 
pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader, or his designee, it 
stand adjourned until noon on Wednesday, September 8, 1993, or until 
noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of 
business on Friday, August 6, 1993, Saturday, August 7, 1993, or 
Sunday, August 8, 1993, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority 
Leader, or his designee, in accordance with this resolution, it stand 
recessed or adjourned until Tuesday, September 7, 1993, at such time as 
may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion 
to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 6, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1149

JOAN H. BRAITSCH, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EMC CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellant, and THOMAS AARON; MICHAEL GRILLI; FRANK KEANEY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1693-A) Submitted: January 11, 2000 Decided: March 20, 2000 Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Whitney Adams, McLean, Virginia, Theodore B. Olson, Thomas G. Hungar, GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Richard L. Swick, SWICK & SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant EMC Corporation, the prevailing party in a civil rights action brought by Appellee Joan H. Braitsch, appeals the district court’s refusal to award attorney’s fees. This is thesecond time this issue has come before us. In EMC’s previous appeal, we noted an ambiguity in the record concerning the district court’s rationale for denying fees, and we therefore remanded for further proceedings. See Braitsch v. EMC Corp. , No. 97-1467, 1997 WL 787125 (4th Cir. Dec. 24, 1997) (unpublished). The district court has now clarified its reasons for denying fees. We have reviewed the court’s opinion and find no abuse of discretion. See DeBauche v. Trani, 191 F.3d 499, 510 (4th Cir. 1999) (noting that whether to grant or deny fees is a matter forthe district court’s discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order declining to award attorney’s fees. Furthermore, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process, we grant Braitsch’s motion for summary affirmance and deny EMC’s request for oral argument. AFFIRMED
- 1 -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION – DISTRICT COURT

Mr. Michael Moates, MA, QBA, LBA, 

Plaintiff

v.

Michael Arismendez, in his capacity as Executive 

Director of the Texas Department of Licensing and 

Regulation;

Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation; and

Behavior Analyst Certification Board;

Case No.: 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ 

MOTION TO STAY AND 

RECONSIDER

Case 4:22-cv-00262-P Document 13 Filed 04/20/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 143
- 2 -

Plaintiff Michael Moates herby request this court issue an order staying the ORDER 

ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED 

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Further, the Plaintiff requests the court reconsider its order 

given new circumstance that have come to light.

Defendant Behavior Analyst Certification Board has filed civil litigation in the Jefferson County 

District Court of Colorado. See attachment 1. The Plaintiff intends to file a notice of removal 

within the next 7 business days. The Plaintiff will then file a Motion to Consolidate with this 

court. The cases cover similar questions of fact/law. It would be redundant litigation for similar 

facts and the causes of action are more appropriate for a counter-claim. Should the court grant 

this motion, the Plaintiff respectfully withdraws his appeals to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

SERVICE

1. Plaintiff Moates can be served and consents to service via email if service is sent to both email addresses: 

michaelsmoates@gmail.com and michael@gibpe.org

2. Defendants Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation and its Executive Director have consented to 

service via email on 8 February 2022. The email is Elizabeth.Salinas-Strittmatter@tdlr.texas.gov. See 

Exhibit H.

3. Defendant Behavior Analyst Certification Board can be served at Behavior Analyst Certification Board, 

7950 Shaffer Parkway, Littleton, CO 80127.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Michael S. Moates, MA, QBA, LBA

michael@gibpe.org

michaelsmoates@gmail.com

2700 Colorado Boulevard #1526

Denton, TX 76210

Cell Phone: 817-999-7534

Case 4:22-cv-00262-P Document 13 Filed 04/20/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 144
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 Certification Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  The
following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 of Hub Group, Inc. pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be deemed filed
pursuant to any provision of the Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities
law.
  Each of
the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Hub Group, Inc.
  /s/David
      P. Yeager
                
                
                /s/Terri
      A. PizzutoName:
      David P. Yeager
                
                
                Name: Terri
      A. PizzutoTitle: Vice
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                
                
                Title:
      Executive Vice President, Chief FinancialHub
      Group, Inc.
                
                
                Officer
      and TreasurerHub
      Group, Inc.
Exhibit 32.2

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 906**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terry L. Stevens, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the Operating Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ TERRYL.STEVENS                                                                       |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Terry L. StevensSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner |   |
| November 12, 2008                                                              |   |

 

 

42
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 34 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 34

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Calling for a continued United States policy of opposition to the 
resumption of commercial whaling, and otherwise expressing the sense of 
  the Congress with respect to conserving and protecting the world's 
               whale, dolphin, and porpoise populations.






103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 34

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas there is significant widespread support in the international community 
        for the view that for scientific, ecological, and educational reasons, 
        whales should no longer be hunted for profit;
Whereas there is concern that efforts will be made at the 1993 Annual Meeting of 
        the International Whaling Commission to overturn the Commission's 
        existing moratorium on commercial whaling of large whales;
Whereas there are species of small cetaceans that are currently subject to 
        direct commercial harvest;
Whereas there are unique regions of the world's seas which serve as important 
        feeding grounds for many species of whales, and where the impacts of 
        environmental threats are unknown: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the United States policy should promote the 
        conservation and protection of whale, dolphin, and porpoise 
        populations;
            (2) the United States should remain opposed to any 
        resumption of commercial whaling, and should work toward a 
        moratorium on the direct commercial harvest of dolphins and 
        porpoises;
            (3) the United States should work to strengthen the 
        International Whaling Commission by reaffirming its competence 
        to regulate direct commercial harvest of small cetaceans and 
        should encourage the Commission to consider the expertise of 
        its Scientific Committee;
            (4) the United States should support the establishment of 
        appropriate international sanctuaries where whaling is 
        prohibited; and
            (5) in promoting the conservation and protection of the 
        world's whale populations, the United States should make the 
        fullest use of diplomatic channels, appropriate domestic and 
        international law, and all other available means.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 16, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 23038.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 17, 1945.

Wright Stubbs and Horace H. Shelton, both of Austin, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Upon his plea of guilty to the offense of driving a car without the consent of the owner, appellant was assessed a fine of $50 and thirty days in jail.

The record is before us without bills of exception or a statement of facts.

No error is apparent.

The judgment of the trial court .is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 270 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 270

 Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the use of racially 
    based quotas designed to thwart the implementation of the death 
                                penalty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 1994

 Mr. Huffington (for himself, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Torkildsen, Mr. DeLay, 
   Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. Greenwood, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. McCollum, Mr. 
    Bonilla, Mr. Pombo, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Kingston, Mr. Lewis of 
   California, Mr. Grams, Mr. Portman, Mr. Condit, Mr. Everett, Mr. 
 Walker, Mr. Kyl, Mr. McKeon, Mrs. Fowler, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Barcia of 
    Michigan, Mr. Herger, Ms. Dunn, Mr. McCandless, and Mr. Armey) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the use of racially 
    based quotas designed to thwart the implementation of the death 
                                penalty.

Whereas a racially based quota system designed to thwart the implementation of 
        the death penalty is vigorously opposed by the National District 
        Attorneys Association and the National Association of Attorneys General; 
        and
Whereas the death penalty is supported by a majority of Americans as a weapon 
        against the spread of violent crime: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that neither the President nor any 
other entity in the executive branch should attempt to impose a 
racially based quota system to challenge death penalties because such a 
system is antithetical to the American ideal of justice.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements of Imprint Records, Inc. as of April 30, 1997 and for the quarter
ended April 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         171
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  168
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    211
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               588
<PP&E>                                         476
<DEPRECIATION>                                 122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          625
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6302
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5964)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   963
<SALES>                                        399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               399
<CGS>                                          231
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  231
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               876
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (705)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (705)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (705)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.15)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                                                    ------------

I,  Steven  M.  Plumb  ,  certify  that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  Form  10-Q  of  Hyperdynamics  Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material  fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made,  in  light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [LANGUAGE OMITTED PER RELEASE NO.
34-52492] for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls  and  procedures  to  be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [LANGUAGE OMITTED PER RELEASE NO. 34-52492];

(c)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)  Disclosed  in  this  report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the registrant's most recent
fiscal  quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The  registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our  most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the design or
operation  of  internal  control  over  financial reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  Any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that involves management or other
employees  who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  December  8,  2005

(signed)  __________________
By:   /s/  Steven  M.  Plumb
      Steven  M.  Plumb
      Chief  Financial  Officer