alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF COMMUNICATIONS INSTRUMENTS, INC. (AS OF 12/31/99)

<TABLE>
<S><C>
         Name of Entity                                       Name of Owner
         --------------                                       -------------
Electro-Mech, S. A. de C. V., a corporation          Communications Instruments, Inc., a
organized under the laws of Mexico                   North Carolina corporation

Kilovac Corporation, A California corporation        Communications Instruments, Inc., a
                                                     North Carolina corporation

Corcom, Inc., an Illinois corporation                Communications Instruments, Inc., a
                                                     North Carolina corporation

Products Unlimited Corporation, an Iowa              Communications Instruments, Inc., a
corporation                                          North Carolina corporation

Kilovac International, Inc., a California            Kilovac Corporation, a California
corporation                                          corporation

Kilovac International FSC, Ltd., a                   Kilovac Corporation, a California
corporation organized under the laws of              corporation
Jamaica

Corcom, S. A. de C. V., a corporation                Corcom, Inc., an Illinois corporation
organized under the laws of Mexico

Corcom West Indies Ltd., a corporation               Corcom, Inc., an Illinois corporation
organized under the laws of Barbados

Corcom International Ltd., a corporation             Corcom, Inc., an Illinois corporation
organized under the laws of Barbados

Corcom GmbH, a corporation  organized                Corcom, Inc., an Illinois corporation
under the laws of Germany

Corcom Far East Ltd., a corporation                  Corcom, Inc., an Illinois corporation
organized under the laws of Hong Kong

Marc Industries, Inc., an Iowa corporation           Products Unlimited Corporation, an
                                                     Iowa corporation

SOL Industries, Inc., an Iowa corporation            Products Unlimited Corporation, an
                                                     Iowa corporation

GW Industries, Inc., an Iowa corporation             Products Unlimited Corporation, an
                                                     Iowa corporation

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
March 31, 1997 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          59,346
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,346
<PP&E>                                           8,650
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 187,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,017,678
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                    (830,497)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   187,182
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                76,069
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,267
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (92,336)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (92,336)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (92,336)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Case 2:22-cv-00094-Z Document 13 Filed 05/05/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 227
H. Con. Res. 23 Agreed to January 26, 1993

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol is authorized and directed

to transfer to the custody of the Chief Justice of the United States

the catafalque which is presently situated in the crypt beneath

the rotunda of the Capitol so that the said catafalque may be

used in the Supreme Court Building in connection with services

to be conducted there for the late Honorable Thurgood Marshall,

former Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF DATASTREAM SYSTEMS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Datastream Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Larry G. Blackwell, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ LARRY G. BLACKWELLLarry G. BlackwellChief Executive OfficerDatastream Systems, Inc.March 23, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00044-Z-BR

§

MICHAEL ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

MICHAEL ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th 

Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 2 of the 

Indictment. After cautioning and examining MICHAEL ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ under oath concerning each of the 

subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense 

charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore 

recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that MICHAEL ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ be adjudged guilty of 21 

U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C) - DISTRIBUTION AND POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE 

METHAMPHETAMINE and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the District 

Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: August 12, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service 

shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00044-Z-BR Document 54 Filed 08/12/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 138
#### INGRAM v. STATE.

No. 26363.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 15, 1953.

*711No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of .Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of selling flavoring extract for beverage purposes, knowing that the purchaser intended to use the same for beverage purposes, and his punishment was assessed at six months in jail.

The complaint and information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. •

Opinion approved by the Court
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-22-00319-CV

__________________

RONALD LYONS, Appellant

V.

O. W. COLLINS APARTMENTS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 137,932

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ronald Lyons, appearing pro se, appeals from a judgment granting O.W. 

Collins Apartments possession of an apartment located at 4440 Gulfway Drive, Port 

Arthur, Texas and $444.15 in past-due rent. After Lyons filed his appeal, he failed 

to file a brief. 

On December 19, 2022, the CourtClerk notified the parties that Lyons’ brief 

had not been filed. In the letter, Lyons was advised that the appeal would be 

submitted without briefs unless we received his brief and a motion to extend the 
2

deadline in which he had to file his brief within ten days. The letter further warned 

Lyons the appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if the Court submitted 

the appeal without briefs. 

On January 13, 2023, the Clerk notified the parties the appeal would be 

submitted to the Court on February 3, 2023, without briefs and without oral 

argument. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. In the absence of a brief assigning any errors

for the Court to review, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 38.8(a)(1); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on February 3, 2023

Opinion Delivered March 2, 2023

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ELVIS WAYNE JONES, §

#00536937 §

§

Petitioner, §

§

v. § No. 3:22-CV-00724-E (BH)

§

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID §

§

Respondent. § Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in 

this case. (ECF No. 29). No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed 

findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS

the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED: July 28, 2023.

Case 3:22-cv-00724-E-BH Document 30 Filed 07/28/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 150
(logo) Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") dated as of March 1,2015 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.as Trust Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as CertificateAdministrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and Wilmington Trust,National Association as Trustee relating to the Wells Fargo Commercial MortgageTrust 2015-LC20, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-LC20**(WFCM 2015-LC20)**

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the“Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.        All servicing activitiesand performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.        A review of the servicingactivities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1,2018 to December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with thePooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.        To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in allmaterial respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure tofulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and thenature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, ManagingDirector 

 

Date: March 1, 2019
Michael Feldman 4/14/2015

On April 14, 2015

, EPA received a letter from Baker Botts L.L.P. on behalf of Entergy Arkansas Inc. identifying an error in the modeled location of the Entergy Independence facility. 1 I confirmed that an error was made when the latitude and longitude for the facility were input into a spreadsheet to convert decimal degree coordinates into the Lambert Conformal Conic (LCC) coordinates required for the CALPUFF modeling. 34 degrees latitude was input instead of the correct value of 35 degrees latitude. This caused the modeled facility location to be approximately 110km further south than the correct location. The table below shows the incorrect location that was used in the CALPUFF modeling and the corrected value. In addition, the letter noted that the L CC conversion workbook used was not available
in the docket.

Attached to this document are three versions of conversion spreadsheet that was used.

1) The original 2) The incorrect spreadsheet that was previously relied upon for the Independence facility loc ation 3) T he corrected spreadsheet that corrects the error identified above

Location of Entergy Independence

Latitude Longitude LCC X

- coordinate (km) LCC Y

- coordinate

(km)
Modeled location 34.6733

- 91.4083 510.834 8

- 572.707 3 Corrected location 35.6733

- 91.4083 504.034 2

- 462.325 1

1 April 13, 2015 letter from Mr. Bill Bumpers to Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section, EPA Region 6, RE: Request for an Extension of the Public Comment Period on the Proposed Rule to Promulgate a Regional Haze and Interstate Visibility Transport Federal Implementation Plan for Arkansas, Docket No. EPA

- R06

- OAR

- 2015

- 0189
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-045-02-H

CHRISTOPHER LEE HERNANDEZ,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE UIVITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance wirh 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(b)(l), the undersigned District Judge is ofthe opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Deflendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

rs7

DatedJuly tY ,2022.

JAMES SLEYHENDRIX

UNITE STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:22-cr-00045-H-BQ Document 47 Filed 07/18/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 83
# CITY_Of_CORDOV: Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Chief, EAS Division ·Office ofAviation Analysis

U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 .

**~;.**

**~:** 24 December 2014 Re: Continuation ofAlaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Cordova, Gustavus, Petersburg, Wrangell, and Yakutat, Alaska, Dot:;ket

**OST-.1998~4899** bear Mr: Schlemmer : The purpose ofthis letter is to voice our strong supportforAlaska Airlines continued essential . air service to Cordova arid other communities in southeastern Alaska. Alaska Air service connects passengers in rural communities to one or more major cities either inside the state orthru Seattle. From these hubs, Cordovans can access the airline's extensive ratite system and benefitfrom its marketing relationshipswith other carriers. The passenger and cargo aircraft, which Alaska Airlines proposes to continue using on this route, provides freight, mail and cargo capacity that is simply beyond the capabilities of any other carrier. Further, Alaska Airlines fleet is equipped with Required Navigation Performance Technology, which enables the airline to reliably access the airport during inclement weather, thus reducing diversions and cancellations and, in turn, enabling people and products to dependably reach Cordova while allowing our citizens and commodities global access. Alaska Airlines' service is essential to Cordova's social and economic well-being and we, the Mayorand Council ofthe City ofCordova,

**whol~heartedly** endorse their application to provide Essential Air Service to SoutheastAlaska. Sincerely,



# ~~ Jim



## ~csh . Mayor 

# n--1"



# fitAV~ Tim Joyce Councilor 

### CF: City

### Manager TimThompson, 

### AlaskaAir 

# (LviSfJr- (j.**KN-~.-** Kristin



# Carp~er Councilor



### 602 Railroad Avenue 

### P.O. Box 1210 Cordova. Alaska 99574 Telephone (907) 424·6200 Fax(907)424·6000
Motion for Rehearing Granted, Memorandum Opinion filed July 9, 2013,

Withdrawn, Appeal Reinstated, and Order filed August 15 , 2013

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00089

- CV

____________ WALTER DAVIDSON AND WILLIAM MURRY , INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A ALL WORXS AND AMTEL COMM UNICATIONS , Appellant s
V.

TEL WEST NETWORK SER VICES CORPORATION , Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 61790



### ORDER

On July 9, 2013 , this Court issued an opinion dismissing this appeal. On July 24, 2013 , appellant filed a motion for rehearing. The motion is granted.This Court’s opinion filed July 9, 2013 , is withdrawn , and our judgment of

that date is vacated. The appeal is ord ered reinstated.

PER CURIAM
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 164

Concerning the responsibility of the Federal Government for providing social

services for undocumented aliens.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12, 1993

Ms. SCHENK submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning the responsibility of the Federal Government for

providing social services for undocumented aliens.

Whereas the Federal Government is charged with enforcing

immigration law, and restricting the entry of undocumented aliens into this country;

Whereas undocumented aliens who enter the United States

through illegal means use social services such as emergency health care, public education, and the functions of

the judicial system;

Whereas these social services are financed through State and

local tax revenues;

Whereas, because of their undocumented status, such aliens

often do not contribute tax revenues to help compensate

for State and local provision of such services;
2

•HCON 164 IH

Whereas one study estimates that the provision of social services to undocumented aliens costs San Diego County over

$244,000,000 each year; and

Whereas the Federal Government provides grants to States

with high populations of legal immigrants under the

State Legalization and Impact Assistance Grant program: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) immigration is a Federal matter, and that

4 the Federal Government should assume responsibil5 ity for financing the provision of social services to

6 undocumented aliens living in this country; and

7 (2) the Federal Government should support ef8 forts by State and local governments to assemble re9 liable data on the costs of providing such services to

10 undocumented aliens.

Æ
#### Junior SIMPKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27116.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 27, 1954.

*955No attorney on appeal.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, 5 years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.