alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VINTON P. FROST,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

MELANIE ANN PUSTAY; et al.,

Defendants. No. 19

- 15579

D.C. No. 3:17

- cv

- 01240

- JCS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Joseph C. Spero, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 14 , 2020 * *

Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND , and R. NELSON , Circuit Judges.

Vinton P. Frost appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 20 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 15579

his Freedom of Information Act action arising out of the Department of Justice’s

respons es to his requests for records

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §

1291. We review de novo whether the magistrate judge validly entered judgment

on behalf of the district court. Williams v. King , 875 F.3d 500, 502 (9th Cir. 2017)

.

We vacate and rem and.

Frost consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(c). The magistrate judge then dismissed claim s against defendant s Pustay

and O’Neill before they had been served. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Because all

parties, including unserved defendants, must consent to proceed before the

magistrate judge for jurisdiction to vest, see Williams

, 875 F.3d at 503

- 04, we

vacate the magistrate judge’s May 1 5, 2017 order and remand for further

proceedings as to the dismissed claims.

In light of our disposition, we do not consider Frost ’s contentions regarding

summary judgment.

All pending motions and requests are denied.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.
Exhibit 31.2





Certification








I,Frank E.
Verdecanna, certify
that:





1.     I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K/A of
iPass Inc.;





2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.







April
      30, 2009
                /s/
      Frank E. VerdecannaFrank
      E. Verdecanna
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
                  (Principal
      Financial Officer)
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior National Park Service
 Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act that a meeting of the Joshua Tree National Park Advisory Commission (Commission) will be held from 10 am (PDT) until 2 pm on Friday, December 1, 2000, at the Black Rock Interagency Fire Center at 9800 Black Rock Canyon Road, Black Rock Campground, in the city of Yucca Valley, California. The Commission will hear reports by the Climbing Committee, the Park Wilderness Steering Committee, the Park Trails Program, the Park Road Construction Project, the Park FY2001 Budget and the Joshua Tree Fund. The Commission was established by Public Law 103-433, section 107 to advise the Secretary concerning the development and implementation of a new or revised comprehensive management plan Joshua Tree National Park. Members of the Commission include:Mr. Chuck Bell
Planner.Ms. Cyndie Bransford
Recreational Climbing Interest.Ms. Marie Brashear
Mining Interest.Mr. Gary Daigneault
Property Owner/Business Interest.Hon. Kathy Davis
County of San Bernardino.Mr. John Freter
Property Owner Interest.Mr. Brian Huse
Conservation.Mr. Julian McIntyre
Conservation.Mr. Roger Melanson
Equestrian Interest.Mr. Ramon Mendoza
Native American Interest.Ms. Leslie Mouriquand
Planner.Mr. Richard Russell
All Wheel Drive Vehicle Interest.Ms. Lynne Shmakoff
Property Owner Interest.Hon. Roy Wilson
County of Riverside.Mr. Gilbert Zimmerman
Tourism.
 The meeting is open to the public and will be recorded for documentation and transcribed for dissemination. Minutes of the meeting will be available to the public after approval of the full Advisory Commission. For copies, please contact Superintendent, Joshua Tree National Park, 74485 National Park Drive, Twentynine Palms, California 92277 at (760)367-5502. Dated: October 31, 2000. Ernest Quintana, Superintendent.


[FR Doc. 00-28573 Filed 11-6-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Order entered February 11, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 14

- 00852

- CV

PAYSON PETROLEUM, IN C. , ET AL. , Appellant s

V.

J. MICHAEL WHEELER , ET AL., Appellee s

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dalla s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 06306



### O RDER

We GRANT appellants’ February 9, 2015 unopposed motion for an extension of time to

file a reply brief. Appellants shall file a reply brief by March 25, 2015.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.10
 AMENDMENT TO
LETTER AGREEMENT
 Amendment Company Employee
 RECITALS
 Letter Agreement
   AGREEMENT
  1. AMENDMENT; DEFINITIONS
 1.1 Amendment
  1.2 Definitions
  1




---



##### 



2. AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT A OF LETTER AGREEMENT
 Exhibit A Exhibit A
 3. COUNTERPARTS
   2




---



##### 



COMPANY
  By:
    
    /s/ Paul DavisName:
    
    Paul DavisTitle:
    
    CEO
 EMPLOYEE
 /s/ John HarveyJohn Harvey
 3




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 TO LETTER AGREEMENT REGARDING RETENTION INCENTIVES
AND RELEASE
 John Harvey
 Stock Option
 http://www.fidelity.com 18,050 Stock Option provided however
 Cash
  $327,054.64
 $327,054.64
 $327,054.64 Cash Incentive
  Related Definitions
 
    
    The term Cause has the same definition as that contained in the Employment
Agreement dated as of June 1, 2009 between you and the Company (including any amendments or
modifications thereto, the Employment Agreement).
    
    The term Good Reason has the same definition as that contained in the Change of
Control Agreement (attached as Exhibit A to the Employment Agreement) to be entered into between
you and the Company as of June 1, 2009 (including any amendments or modifications
thereto, the Change of Control Agreement).
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (a) | A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 has been made under my supervision. |

|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period. |

|                                                                                                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                          |
| /s/ Sumito Mulchandani                                                                                                   |
| Sumito MulchandaniAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2015-A |
Exhibit 35.5










Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation
60 WALL ST
NEW YORK, New York 10005-2836





RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM
2015-DC1 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates



Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March
1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator
("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):



(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period
and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and



(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review,
Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.







February 29, 2016







|               |                    
|-------------- | -------------------
|BRIAN SMITH    | Jeffrey Coletta    
|Vice President | Assistant Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 97 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 97

 Acknowledging Major General Jesse Lee Reno and the 125th birthday of 
                           the city of Reno.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 1993

 Mrs. Vucanovich submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
     was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Acknowledging Major General Jesse Lee Reno and the 125th birthday of 
                           the city of Reno.

Whereas Major General Jesse Lee Reno commanded the Union forces at Chantilly, 
        Virginia, in 1861;
Whereas the Union victory at the Battle of Chantilly saved the Nation's Capitol 
        from possible attack and destruction by Confederate forces;
Whereas General Reno was subsequently killed in action in 1862 at the Battle of 
        South Mountain, Maryland;
Whereas, on May 9, 1868, the railroad depot near the community of Lake's 
        Crossing, in the Truckee Meadows of the State of Nevada, was renamed 
        Reno in honor of Major General Reno;
Whereas May 9, 1993, is the 125th anniversary of the founding of the city of 
        Reno;
Whereas the citizens of the city of Reno will commemorate this historic occasion 
        on May 8 and 9, 1993, by celebrating the city's founding with ``The 
        Biggest Little Birthday Party in the World'';
Whereas the Governor of the State of Nevada has proclaimed May 8 and 9, 1993, as 
        ``Celebration Reno'' throughout the State of Nevada; and
Whereas there will be formal ceremonies in Reno on May 8, 1993, to commemorate 
        the 125th anniversary of the founding of the city of Reno: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) acknowledges the debt of gratitude that the Nation owes 
        to the late Major General Jesse Lee Reno, United States Army; 
        and
            (2) joins with the Governor of the State of Nevada in 
        acknowledging May 8 and 9, 1993, as ``Celebration Reno'' in 
        honor of the 125th birthday of the founding of the city of 
        Reno.

                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PHILIP PULVER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE, a

non-profit corporation; et al.

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-35906

D.C. No. 2:05-cv-05028-RHW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Robert H. Whaley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 24, 2013** 

Before: ALARCÓN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Philip Pulver appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his diversity action alleging breach of contract and other claims. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s

FILED

AUG 05 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-35906

dismissal for lack of standing. Del. Valley Surgical Supply Inc. v. Johnson &

Johnson, 523 F.3d 1116, 1119 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action because Pulver was not a

party to the contract in his individual capacity and lacked standing to maintain the

corporate plaintiff’s breach of contract claim in his individual capacity following

the dismissal of the corporate plaintiff. See Sherman v. British Leyland Motors,

Ltd., 601 F.2d 429, 439-40 & n.13 (9th Cir. 1979) (president and sole stockholder

of corporation lacked standing in his individual capacity to assert contract claims

on behalf of corporation). 

AFFIRMED.
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|U.S. Refinery Finished Reformulated Gasoline Shell Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|U.S. Refinery Finished Reformulated Gasoline Shell Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 13     | 20,504 | NA     | 23,268 | NA     | 22,252
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 24,827 | 23,272 | 21,811 | 21,322 | 15,223 | 15,966 | 16,653 | 12,735 | 12,299 | 12,715
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 9,978  | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 23-40173 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Ricardo Campos-Basurto, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:20-CR-321-1 

______________________________ 

Before Jolly, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Ricardo Campos-Basurto has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Campos-Basurto has filed a response. The record is not 

sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Campos-

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

February 9, 2024 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 23-40173 Document: 00517061502 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/09/2024
No. 23-40173 

2 

Basurto’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to 

consider those claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United 

States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Campos-Basurto’s response. We concur 

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 23-40173 Document: 00517061502 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/09/2024
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 The
          undersigned, Bami Bastani, President and Chief Executive Officer of ANADIGICS,
          Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report of the
          Company
          on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2007 fully complies with
          the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
          1934
          and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          the
          Company.
 
 
 Dated:
          November 8, 2007
  By:
                /s/
                    Bami BastaniBami
                    BastaniPresident
                    and Chief
                    Executive Officer
 
 This
          certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated
          by
          reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act
          of
          1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
          by reference.
 
 A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
          authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
          appears
          in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
          by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained
          by
          ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
          or its
          staff upon request.
#### Ex parte JONES.

No. 25353.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 13, 1951.

J. B. Sallas, Crockett, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is an application to this court for the writ of habeas corpus, by which relator seeks his discharge from the penitentiary.

The record reflects various convictions of relator — some in Houston County, and others in Jefferson County.

The Jefferson County convictions show that relator was sentenced December 27, 1948, to a term of five years in the penitentiary in each of several cases. An order attempting to cumulate the last of these with another case was ineffectual for that purpose, and the sentence in each case *777ran concurrently. The record also affirmatively reflects that relator has not served the five-year sentence imposed by the Jefferson County convictions.

Relator is not now entitled, therefore, to his discharge from the penitentiary, and is not at this time entitled to attack the validity of the Houston -County convictions which were prior to the Jefferson County convictions and which do not affect the validity of the Jefferson County convictions. Ex parte Padgett, Tex.Cr.App., 230 S.W.2d 813.

At the expiration of the service of the Jefferson County term, if relator has not also served the term imposed by the Houston County convictions, his right to invoke the writ of habeas corpus will be available.

The application for the writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Opinion approved by the Court.
**Exhibit 35.2**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

 

I, Cory J. Reed., President of Deere Credit Services, Inc., certify:

 

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period from November 1, 2015 through October 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 11, 2015 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2015 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 
| Date: January 12,   2017 | Deere Credit   Services, Inc. |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                          |                               |
|                          |                               |
|                          |                               |
|                          | By                                 | */s/ Cory J. Reed* |   |
|                          |                               | Cory J. Reed |
|                          |                               | President |

 

----
Case 4:22-cr-00169-P Document 57 Filed 06/29/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 81
Case 4:22-cr-00169-P Document 57 Filed 06/29/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 82