alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00027-Z-BR

§

GARY MARK SULLIVAN, II (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

GARY MARK SULLIVAN, II (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R.CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment.

After cautioning and examining GARY MARK SULLIVAN, II (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned 

in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by 

an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea 

of guilty be accepted, and that GARY MARK SULLIVAN, II (1) be adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2) 

- CONVICTED FELON IN POSSESSION OF A FIREARM and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found 

guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: May 11, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00027-Z-BR Document 29 Filed 05/11/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 61
From:    "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>                                                                         

To:         Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA                                                                                           

Cc:          Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Mariana Cubeddu/DC/USEPA/US@EPA                                                             

Date:      12/10/2010 07:48 PM                                                                                                      

Subject: Part of E.O. 12866 Review: Interagency Discussion about the conclusion of the review process

pertaining to NESHAP: Mercury Emissions from Mercury Cell Chlor‐Alkali Plants 2060‐AN99

Hi Sharon,

We have concluded review of RIN 2060‐AN99, “NESHAP: Mercury Cell Chlor‐Alkali Plants,

Amendments.”

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,

Cortney
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SkillSoft Public Limited Company (the“Company”) for the period ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Charles E. Moran, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: December 8, 2006         /s/ Charles E. Moran   Charles E. Moran   Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28813]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Patent License; American Pipe 
Lining, Inc.

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent 
to grant to American Pipe Lining, Inc., a revocable, nonassignable, 
exclusive license in the United States to practice the Government-owned 
invention described in U.S. Patent No. 5,707,702, entitled ``Epoxy 
Pipelining Composition and Method of Manufacture,'' issued January 13, 
1998.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later 
than January 8, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the Naval Research 
Laboratory, Code 1004, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20375-
5320.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine M. Cotell, Ph.D., Head, 
Technology Transfer Office, NRL Code 1004, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW, 
Washington, DC 20375-5320, telephone (202) 767-7230.
(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404.)

    Dated: October 31, 2000.
J.L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-28813 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Eric S. Yeaman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Turnstone Systems, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Turnstone Systems, Inc. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Turnstone Systems, Inc.,
and will be retained by Turnstone Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                   
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Eric S. Yeaman                                                
|                     |  |  |  | Eric S. Yeaman Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of this Form
10-KSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 OF the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Endocardial Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Robert Paulson, Jr., ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ J.  Robert Paulson, Jr.                                    |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | J. Robert  Paulson, Jr.  Chief Financial Officer  May 14, 2003 |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toEndocardial Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Endocardial Solutions, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
APRIL TERM, 1751.

Lib. E. J. No. 13. fol. 634.

#### George Roch *against*Jacob Giles.

.V. Bordley, for plaintiff.

*E. Dorsey*and Dulany, for defendant.

THIS was a vwrit of *certiorari*to remove the proceed-' ings on a caveat, to the recording of certain depositions taken and returned under a commission, issued out of *Baltimore*County Court by the defendant, to prove the bounds of his lands, and which" the County Court directed to be recorded, and from which decision the *caveator*(Roch) appealed to this Court, and sued for the writ of certiorari, for the removal of the proceedings.

The Provincial Court, having examined the case, award- . ed a *procedendo*to the County Court.
-82 -81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 37

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/27

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 27 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■

■ ■

■

★

●

●

●

●

★

●

●

●

●
31 U.S.C. § 5317. Search and forfeiture of monetary instruments

(a) The Secretary of the Treasury may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for a search 

warrant when the Secretary reasonably believes a monetary instrument is being transported and a 

report on the instrument under section 5316 of this title has not been filed or contains a material 

omission or misstatement. The Secretary shall include a statement of information in support of the 

warrant. On a showing of probable cause, the court may issue a search warrant for a designated 

person or a designated or described place or physical object. This subsection does not affect the 

authority of the Secretary under another law.

(b) Searches at border.--For purposes of ensuring compliance with the requirements of section 

5316, a customs officer may stop and search, at the border and without a search warrant, any vehicle, vessel, aircraft, or other conveyance, any envelope or other container, and any person entering or departing from the United States.

(c) Forfeiture.--

(1) Criminal forfeiture.--

(A) In general.--The court in imposing sentence for any violation of section 5313, 5316, or 

5324 of this title, or any conspiracy to commit such violation, shall order the defendant to 

forfeit all property, real or personal, involved in the offense and any property traceable thereto.

(B) Procedure.--Forfeitures under this paragraph shall be governed by the procedures established in section 413 of the Controlled Substances Act.

(2) Civil forfeiture.--Any property involved in a violation of section 5313, 5316, or 5324 of this 

title, or any conspiracy to commit any such violation, and any property traceable to any such 

violation or conspiracy, may be seized and forfeited to the United States in accordance with the 

procedures governing civil forfeitures in money laundering cases pursuant to section 

981(a)(1)(A) of title 18, United States Code.
EXHIBIT
      32.1








Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The
      following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q
      for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 of Hub Group, Inc. pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be deemed
      filed
      pursuant to any provision of the Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities
      law .




Each
      of
      the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Hub Group, Inc.






/s/David P. Yeager
            /s/Terri A. PizzutoDavid
              P. Yeager
            Terri A. PizzutoVice Chairman and Chief Executive
              Officer
            Executive Vice President,Chief
              Financial Officer and TreasurerHub Group, Inc.
            Hub Group,
              Inc.
#### BARNETT v. STATE.

No. 25419.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 24, 1951.

Ross Hoffman, Brady, for appellant, *i*

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, ¡Commissioner.

This is a conviction for the unlawful sale of 'whisky in a dry area, and as a second offender. The punishment was assessed at a fine of $500 and thirty days in jail.

Neither the complaint nor the information alleges the name of the purchaser of the whisky. As to this, the allegation is that appellant “did then and there unlawfully sell intoxicating liquor, towit; whisky in violation of said law.” Under Arts. 406 and 416, C.C.P., in order “to charge an unlawful sale, it is necessary to name the purchaser.”

Such allegation is not necessary where the name of the purchaser is unknown, in which event the pleading must so allege.

In the instant case, the state relied upon the testimony of Summerlin, an agent of the Liquor Control Board, who testified to having purchased whisky from appellant upon the date alleged. The state, therefore, knew the name of the purchaser and, in order to comply with the mandate of the statute, was required to name the purchaser in the complaint and information. Attesting authorities are: Jones v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 418, 27 S.W.2d 653; Whittlesey v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 497, 262 S.W. 757; Loftin v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 401, 261 S.W. 1031; Lewis v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 152, 259 S.W. 1087; Hoover v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 91, 259 S.W. 1088; Alexander v. State, 29 Tex. 495, 496. The Lewis and Hoover cases, supra, are directly in point and controlling.

At the close of the testimony, the appellant challenged the sufficiency of the information to charge any offense under the law by motion for an instructed verdict, which was overruled.

The information being fatally defective, the judgment is reversed and' prosecution ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page #1 CBI: No ID Number: P-04-0244 Final Draft Revision (5/18/2004) ENGINEER: Prothero \ JB PV (kg/yr): SUBMITTER: Standard Review Revision Notes: USE: chemical intermediate OTHER USES:

MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: Chemical safety glasses with side shields or goggles, chemical resistant gloves, Use local exhaust to minimize misting and vapor, and mechanical ventilation for general area control. Respirator: Wear a NIOSH/MSHA approved organic/acid gas cartridge respirator if misting or vapor occurs. Health Effects: May be harmful by inhalation, ingestion or skin absorption. Causes mucous membrane and upper respiratory tract irritation. Causes skin and eye irritation. CRSS (1/20/2004):Chemical Name: Ethane, 2-bromo-1,1-difluoroS-H20: 1.1 g/L VP: 233 torr MW: 144.95 Phys State: NEAT: liquid; MFG: liquid; PROC/FORM: NA; END USE: destroyed. Consumer Use:STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page #2 CBI: No ID Number: P-04-0244 Final Draft Revision (5/18/2004)
SAT (1/21/2004): Migration to groundwater: rapid PBT rating: P1B1T2 Health: 2 (dermal, inhalation, drinking water) Eco: 1 (no releases to water)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2 NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: IRER generated by ChemSTEER ver 7/24/03. The vapor pressure for the PMN was above 35 torr (vapor model limit

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: FOCUS NOTES SUMMARY:STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page #3 CBI: No ID Number: P-04-0244 Final Draft Revision (5/18/2004)

Number of Sites: Days/yr: Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARYSTANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page #4 CBI: No ID Number: P-04-0244 Final Draft Revision (5/18/2004)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers: Inhalation: Dermal:STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page #5 CBI: No ID Number: P-04-0244 Final Draft Revision (5/18/2004)

Number of Sites: Days/yr: Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARYSTANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page #6 CBI: No ID Number: P-04-0244 Final Draft Revision (5/18/2004)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers: Inhalation: Dermal:STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page #7 CBI: No ID Number: P-04-0244 Final Draft Revision (5/18/2004) Contact Report Scott Prothero, US EPA/ OPPT/ CEB, contacted Richard Henrich, Great Lakes Chemical Corp, by phone on Wedn, 2/11/04 at 2:40pm regarding P-04-244. The following is a summary of the issues discussed.

++++ As follow-on to the 2/11 phone contact, Mr. Prothero and Mr. Henrich spoke by phone on 2/19/04.STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page #8 CBI: No ID Number: P-04-0244 Final Draft Revision (5/18/2004) Contact ReportSTANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page #9 CBI: No ID Number: P-04-0244 Final Draft Revision (5/18/2004)
4

Case 5:22-cr-00041-H-BV Document 168 Filed 10/28/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 459
Case 5:22-cr-00041-H-BV Document 168 Filed 10/28/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 460
#### BRASUELL v. STATE.

No. 25834.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 21, 1952.

*934No attorney for appellant.

*George*P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This purports to be an appeal from a conviction for false imprisonment, with punishment assessed at 'sixty days’ confinement in jail.

The notice of appeal in this case appears only as a notation upon the motion for a new trial. It does not appear as a judgment entered in the minutes of the court. Such is necessary to constitute a valid notice of appeal. Art. 827, Vernon’s C.C.P., and authorities there cited.

A valid notice of appeal is necessary to the jurisdiction of this court.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court,
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28926]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-272-019]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

November 6, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 31, 2000, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern) tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, 
proposed to become effective on November 1, 2000:

Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 66
First Revised Sheet No. 66A
First Revised Sheet No. 66B
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 66C

    Northern states that the above sheets are being filed to implement 
a specific negotiated rate transaction with Midwest Natural Gas, Inc. 
in accordance with the Commission's Policy Statement on Alternatives to 
Traditional Cost-of-Service Ratemaking for Natural Gas Pipelines. In 
addition, those negotiated rates that have expired have been deleted.
    Northern further states that copies of the filing have been mailed 
to each of its customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sec. 385.214 or Sec. 385.211 of the Commission's rules 
and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28926 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 21, 2014 

# Order

October 21, 2014

149407

- 8 ( 83 )

LOWE'S HOME CENTERS

, INC

. , P etitioner

- Appell ee
,

v

TOWNSHIP OF MARQUETTE

, Respondent

- Appell ant

. SC: 149407

COA: 314111

MTT: 00

- 385768

________________________________________/

HOME DEPOT USA, INC

. , P etitioner

- Appell ee
,

v

TOWNSHIP OF BREITUNG

, Respondent

- Appell ant

. SC: 149408

COA: 314301

MTT: 00

- 366428

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of petitioners

- appellees to file a response to the amicus curiae brief filed by the Michigan Municipal League, the Michigan Association of Counties, and the Michigan Association of School Boards is GRANTED.

The re sponse to the amicus brief submitted on October 9, 2014, is accepted for filing.