P. 1 

# OAR Box 1784 Prepped byOllie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 55 ) ll-D- 7 Docket Number: 

# A--84-4 4

Printed 10/31/20088:05:40AM

Sheet 55of 143P. 2 

# L AGLORI A© Oi l an d Ga s Compan yP. O
. BO X84O , TYLER

, TEXA S 

## 7571 0 ATEXA S EASTER N COMPAN Y

Apri l9 , 198 5 

# J-i2 'is/i3- 

# Jr

Mr . Jac k R . Farmer , Directo r Emissio n Standard s an d Engineering Divisio n Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlanning an d Standard s Unite d State s Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolin a 2771 1 Dea r Mr . Farmer : A s requested , w e hav e complete d an d ar e returning the questionnair e regarding ou r refineryfue l ga s an d it s H2 S conten t monitorin g an d re mova l systems . Al l o f th e informatio n requeste d i n you r Enclosur e I i s include d excep t fo r the following sections : V . PrimaryControl(Amin e Treaters ) VI . SecondaryControl(Sulfu r Plants , etc. ) VIII.4 . Monitorin g o f Proces s Parameters . Informatio n answering th e question s i n thes e section s wil l b e forwarde d a t a late r date . Pleas e contac t Phili p Fo xo f L a Glori a a t (214 ) 595-451 1 i f furthe r in
formatio n i s required . Your s truly ,

PFF:ab Attachment s pc : L . B . Gatewoo d C . 0 . Pett y D . H . Franc e P . F . Fo x 

# ,0&xftt ^r*TM*<F*e Alvi e R . Livermore , P.E . Manage r o f EngineeringP. 3

INFORMATIO

NNEED S FOR REVIEWINGTH E REFINERY FUE L GA S NSP S
ITE MI : Introductio n N o answer s ar e require d ITE MII : Facilit yDescriptio n Figur e I i s a schemati c o f the refinery' s fue l ga s system . Sou r ga s fromth e FC C Unit , # 2 coker , saturat e ga s plan t an d the //

l HD S uni t i s treate d a t th e DE Aplant . Th e aci d ga s strea mfro mth e DE Auni t an d th e sour wate r strippe r off-ga s mak e u p th e charg e t o th e sulfu r recoveryuni t (SRU) . Swee t purchase d natura l ga s an d th e separato r gase s fromth e # 1 platformer , th e # 2 platformer , an d th e rheniforme r ar e blende d wit hthe sweetene d refineryga s fro mthe DE Auni t up strea mi n two paralle l fue l ga s mixin g drums . Ther e i s a stati c inlin e mixe r downstrea mo f thes e tw

o drum s afte r the outle t line s combine . Thi s fue l ga s blen d i s use d plan t wid e i n th e stea m boilers , i n the proces s uni t heaters , a t th e SR Uincinerato r an

d a t th e refinery' s flares . Th e monito r fo r th e fue l ga s H2 S conten t i s locate d downstrea

mo f th e inlin e stati c mixer . Emissio n monitorin g sample s ar e take n fro mth e sampl e drawlin e use d fo r th e continuou s H2 S monitor . ITE MIII : Cost s 1 . Th e tota l cost s fo r material s an d installatio n o f th e sulfu r recoveryuni t an

d th e DE Auni t wa s $5,310,000 . Thi s cos t wa s incurre d during 197 9 an d 1980 . Th e SR

Uan d DE Aunit s wer e con structe d specificall yfo r th e purpos e o f meetin g th e NSP S fo r ne wcombustio n sources . Th e DE Auni t i s currentl ydedicate d t o refineryga s servic e only . 2 . Purchas e Cost s a . Th e purchase d cos t o f th e Sulfu r Recoveryan d o f the DE Auni t togethe r wa s abou t $2,046,000 . Th e cos t fo r th e DE Auni t alon e i s no t available . 1 . Breakdow

n b ymajo r equipment : No t availabl e 2 . Cos t o f initia l chemica l inventory : $4,00 0 fo r 2 0 drum s o f DE A@ $20 0 pe r drum . 3 . Installatio n Cos t a . Th e installatio n cos t fo r the SRUan d DE Auni t wa s abou t $3,262,000 . Th e cos t fo r the DE Auni t alon e i s no t readil y available .

- 1 -P. 4 \



## H * < 3 ^ - *

—- - ^ ui 

### L L

## <ti_
_ 

# o U L 

# o 

# /I Ui ,



# .a

J , < £ l_t - • 1 « 

## vt e v i < 

### 1 3 ul 

### O i U i c < 

### U l < 0 

## c i(J } C o V N



# - i Q 

# c i - ) 

### uo 

## U -



## «5 [

*P. 5

1 . Breakdown b

ydirec t an

d indirec t costs : No t availabl e 2 . Not e specifi c cost s attributabl e t o retrofitting a ne wo r expande d anin e treate r int o a n existing system : No t applicable . 4 . Annua l Operatin g Cost s a . (SR Uan d DE AUni t together : 1983 ) 1 . 915 2 manhours/yea r @ $17.48/hou r (estimated overhead included ) 2 . Material s a . Replacemen t parts : $3500/yea r (est ) b . 110 0 gallon s @$3.64/gallong fo r DE A 3 . Annua l Steam : Nonerequire d continuousl y 4 . Electricity : $35,576/yea r 5 . Water : No t availabl e 6 . Fue l Gas : $32,450/yea r 7 . Sulfu r recovere d credit s $116,91 7 (1983 ) 5 . Ke yAccountin g Factor s a . Lifetim e o f equipment : 1 6 year s (est ) b . Equipmen t amortizatio n an d depreciatio n rat e straightlin e depreciatio n (1 6 yea r term ) c . Labo r an

d managemen t charge s (No t available ) d . Overhea d rat e (50 % use d fo r labor ) ITE MIV : RefineryCombustio n Device s 1 . //o f combustio n source s a t th e refinery : 2 7 2 . Genera l informatio n abou t specifi c type s o f combustio n sources : Siz e Cost s Hour s Othe r fromTAC B Capito l o f Fuel s Permit s & Operating Operatio n Use d # 4 Crud e Heate r 856 6 MCF D No t Readil yContinuou s Non e othe r (Proces s Heater ) Fue l Ga s Availabl e Currentl y Blend Boile r # 8 374 4 MCF D Fue l Ga s Blend No t Readil y

Availabl e Continuou s Non e othe r Currentl y # 5 Flar e 4.7 5 MCF D Fue l Ga s Blend No t Readil y

Availabl e Continuou s Non e Othe r Currentl y

- 2 -P. 6

3 . Unit s Affecte d b yCombustio n Devic e NSP S # 4 Crud e Heate r Vacuu mUni t Heate r # 2 Coke r Heate r It2 EDS Heate r # 2 Platforme r Heate r # 9 Boile r Heate r Flar e # 2 Flar e # 3 SRUTai l Ga s Incinerato r Complianc e Method s Ne wAmin e Treate r Adde d

4 . Leve l o f ^ S an d othe r sulfu r compound s i n th e flu e ga s whic hwoul d b e acceptabl e befor e significan t advers e corrosio n o f combustio n equipmen t woul d occur : 200 0 ppmiH2 S 5 . Othe r state , federa l an d loca l environmenta l regulation s applying t o ou r combustio n sources : Th e Texa s Ai r Contro l Boar d Permi t condition s limi t our emission s fromth e source s liste d i n # 2 t o th e equivalen t o f tha t occurring : whe n burning fue l oi l wit h0.7 % sulfu r b

yweight . ITE MV : PrimaryContro l (Amin e Treaters ) Informatio n t o b e forwarde d a t a late r date . ITE MVI : SecondaryContro l (Sulfur Plant ) Informatio n t o b e forwarde d a t a late r date ) ITE MVII : Emissio n Testing (Provid e a cop

yo f al l emission s test s performe d o n fue l ga s fromyou r amin e treaters ) Th e cop ysupplie d i s fo r a tes t conducte d downstrea m o f ou r inlin e stati c mixer . I t doesn' t includ e jus t ga s of f th e amin e treaters . Ga s fromothe r proces s unit s an d natura l ga s ar e include d i n th e blend monitore d a t thi s point . 1 . a . cos t o f emissio n test : No t availabl e b . Testin g conducte d b ya consultan t c . Th e ga s strea

mwa s onl yteste d fo r H2 S conten t d . Th e tes t sit e wa s downstreamo f th e paralle l fue l ga s mixin g drum s an

d afte r the inlin e stati c mixer . Th e compositio n o f th e blende d fue l ga s i s estimate d t o hav e been : Amin e treate d fue l ga s 31.8 % No n treate d proces s uni t of f ga s 55.7 % Swee t Natura l ga s 12.5 % ) ) November , 198 3 )

- 3 -P. 7

2 . Othe r combustio n sourc e emissio n test : N o othe r emissio n test s hav e bee n conducte d othe r than a n opacit ytes t o n ou r wast e hea t boile r 119. 3 . Ar e ther e an

ystat e o r loca l regulation s requiring testing o f fue l ga s o f existin g source s o r whic hrequir e testing o f ne wsource s beyond th e requirement s o f th e NSPS : N o ITE MVIII : Monitorin g o f Emission s an d Proces s Operation s 1 . Discussion : N o answe r required . 2 . Ar e ther e an

ystat e o r loca l regulation s requiring monitoring ? N o monitorin g othe r tha n tha t require d b ythe NSP S regulation s i s required . Ou r Stat e o f Texa s operating permi t reference s the EPA' s NSPS . 3 . a . Descriptio n o f th e H2 S monitorin g system : Th e H2 S concen tratio n o f our fue l ga s i s measure d i n on e locatio n onl ywit h a continuou s instrument . Th e sampl e fo r thi s instrumen t i s obtaine d througha sampl e lin e froma poin t downstrea mo f the fue l ga s mixin g drum s an d downstreamo f the inlin e stati c mixer . Th e primaryreaso n fo r monitorin g thi s strea mi s t o demonstrat e complianc e wit hth e NSPS . b . Manua l sampling procedures : Manua l sampling o f the refinery fue l ga s i s don e periodicall yt o provid e a chec k fo r the continuou s emissio n monito r describe d i n th e previou s para graph . Th e result s ar e no t necessaril ywritte n dow n an d ar e conducte d a s a bal l par k chec k o f th e CEM' s calibration . c . Instrumen t emissio n monito r information : 1 . Vendor : Housto n Atlas , Inc . Mode l No : 722 R - Dat e Installed : 198 0 Cos t t o purchas e an d install : No t readil yavailable . 2 . Maintenanc e history : Frequen t problem s wer e experience d durin g th e firs t fe wyear s o f operatio n o f thi s instrument . Repair s mad e abou t on e yea r ag o hav e mad e thi s instrument' s reliabilit yrecord improv e significantly . Acalibratio n i s normall yrequire d abou t twic e pe r year . Ou r in-hous e instrumen t technician spend s abou t 8-1 0 hour s pe r cali
bratio n o r abou t 1 6 t o 2 0 hour s pe r year . I n addition , a n overhau l costing betwee n $100 0 an d $200 0 can b e expecte d t o b e necessaryabou t onc e pe r year . Thi s i s normall y performe d b

ythe manufacturer .

- 4 -P. 8

3 . Compariso n dat a fo r th e CEM S versu s manua l monitoring : Th e Draega r tub e metho d i s routinel yused a s a doubl e chec k o f th e CEMS' s calibration . Onl yon e se t o f dat a coul d b e readil ylocate d documenting th e compariso n a t hand . O n Novembe r 12 , 1984 , two Draega r test s indicate d 7 0 ppm& 6 0 ppman

d th e CEM S wa s indicating 6 8 ppm . Th e Draega r tube' s accuracyi s ± 10% , therefor e the CEMS' s calibratio n wa s satisfactorybase d upo n the Draega r test' s known accurac yrange . 4 . Dat a recording/reduction : Th e dat a fromth e fue l ga s H2 S concentratio n CEM S i s recorde d continuousl yo n a stri p chart . Th e rawdat a fro mthi s tap e i s reduce d an d analyze d manually . Approximatel yeigh t hour s pe r quarte r i s re quire d t o manuall yreduc e th e dat a fro mthi s CEM S an

d our opacit ymonitor . Al l dat a fromthi s recorde r ha s bee n retaine d sinc e i t wa s installed . 5 . Acopyo f our quarterl yrepor t o f exces s emission s fo r the fourt hquarte r o f 198 4 i s attached . 4 . Monitorin g o f proces s parameters : T o b e forwarde d a t a late r date . 5 . Replacemen t plan s fo r th e fue l ga s H2 S CEMS : Ther e ar e n o plan s t o replac e th e existing CEMS . W e ar e planning t o wai t unti l the performanc e specification s fo r thi s devis e ar e promulgate d befor e a ne winstrumen t i s purchased . 6 . I s the CE Mfo r th e fue l ga s H2 S conten t integrate d int o th e proces s a s a contro l system ? NO ITE MIX : Genera l RefineryInformation : 1 . 49,50 0 barrel s pe r strea mday(nomina l refinerysize) . 35,00 0 t o 49,50 0 BP D (curren t operating level) . Operation s a t the refinery ar e continuou s (2 4 hrs/day ; 7 days/week ) Parameter s affecting the DEA' s uni t operation : a . Crud e uni t charg e rat e b . Ca t cracke r operating rat e c . Crud e sulphu r conten t d . Operatio n o f th e sulfu r recoveryuni t 2 . Crud e oi l sulphu r range : 0.1 % - 0.2 % Crud e oi l sulphu r typical : 0.12 % Operatio n o f th e DE Auni t ha s no t bee n affecte d significantl yt o dat e du e t o crud e sulfu r conten t fluctuation .

- 5P. 9

3 . Wit hou r curren t refinerysetup , the operatio n o f ou r naphtha hydrotreater s doe s no t significantl yaffec t th e operatio n o f our DE Aunit . Th e installatio n o f additiona l intermediat e o r produc t hydrotreatin g coul d significantl yaffec t th e require d siz e o f ou r DE Aunit . 4 . Blendin g o f refineryga s wit hnatura l gas : Approximatel y1 0 t o 15 % o f th e refinery' s fue l ga s i s typicall ycompose d o f adde d swee t purchase d natura l gas . Thi s ga s i s adde d i n orde r t o main
tai n a stead

yflo wo f ga s t o th e refinery' s proces s heaters . ITE MX : Genera l RegulatoryInformation : 1 . Interpretatio n problems : NSPS : W e hav e experience d ver yfew interpretatio n problemn s wit hthe refineryga s determination s require d b

yth e NSPS . Attainmen t problems : NSPS : Th e primaryattainmen t proble mfo r th e Fue l Ga s NSP S i s th e capito l expenditur e required . Contro l Syste moperating problems : Th e thre e problem s w e mos t ofte n experienc e are : a . Scanne r failure s fo r th e flame sensing systemi n the sulfur recoveryunit' s wast e hea t boiler . Withou t th e sulfur plan t operating , th e DE Auni t i s no t necessarybecaus e n o sulfu r i s bein g remove d fromth e system . b . Corrosio n i n variou s difficult-to-repai r area s throughou t th e sulfu r recoveryplan t an d the DE Aunit . c . Insufficien t sulfu r productio n i s jus t a s muc ho f a proble m a s to o muc hsulfu r production . I n our cas e i t i s normall y no t possibl e t o operat e th e SRUand thu s th e DE Auni t i f th e Flui d Catalyti c Cracke r i s no t operating du e t o insufficien t H2 S mak e fromth e othe r sou r ga s sources . 2 . NSP S performanc e testing , monitoring & recordkeeping difficulties : Testing an

d monitorin g i s no t normall ya majo r problemsinc e w e hav e onl yon e H2 S monito r currently . I f monitor s wer e required , o n mor e than a veryfe wstreams , mor e problem s coul d b e antici
pate d du e t o preventativ e maintenanc e problems . Recordkeeping an d reporting ha s bee n a rea l time consume r du e t o th e long hour s require d t o reduc e th e dat a t o repor t format . Areductio n o r streamlining o f reporting requirement s woul d certainl yhel p i n reducing regulatoryburden . Monitorin g o f the H2 S conten t o f the refineryfue l ga s blen d i s certainl ypreferrabl e t o th e monitorin g o f th e SO 2 concentratio n i n th e variou s refinerycombustio n de
vices ' stack s du e t o preventativ e maintenanc e headache s an d larg e maintenanc e an

d operating costs . Th e onlin e record o f ou r system i s certainl ycomparabl e t o tha t whic hwoul d b e expecte d fo r a goo d SO 2 monitorin g system .

6 -P.1 0

3 . Recordkeeping an d reporting cost s an d repor t examples : Actua l time spen t b

ymysel f an

d th e person' s responsibl e fo r the dayt o daymonitorin g o f the CEM S i s abou t $200 0 pe r year . Al l record
keeping i s don e i n the logboo k fo r th e boile r plan t (uni t res ponsibl e fo r th e operatio n o f th e H2 S monitor ) an d o f the res ponsibl e instrumen t technicians . ; Becaus e o f th e us e o f the lo g book s fo r recordkeeping purposes , n o form s ar e use d o r ar e avail
able . Acop

yo f a sampl e quarterl yexces s emission s repor t fo r thi s monito r i s attached . ITE MXI : Informatio n Contac t Phili p F . Fo x(Environmenta l Engineer ) (214 ) 595-4511 .
PFF:a b

- 7 -P.1 1

MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC . P.O . Box59 8 Addison . Tx7500 1 (214)980-184 3 

### TT\



# ] ] FUE L GA S ANALYSI S L AGLORI AOI L S GA S COMPAN Y TYLER , TEXA S NOVEMBE R 198 0

FIL E NUMBE R 80-6 5

MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC . 

### »4Ms^mMUkwmmmxiir^ymLwm m^myfMamamummi^jJMjmmmimmP.1 2

" • ' l u' " 

# 1 1 1 ] TABL E O F CONTENT S

INTRODUCTION SUMMARY O F RESULT S DISCUSSIONO F RESULT S DESCRIPTIONO F SAMPLIN GLOCATIO

N SAMPLINGAND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE S DESCRIPTIONO F TEST S APPENDICE S A . Calibratio n Dat a B . Fiel d Testin g Dat a C . Chai n o f Custod y D . Resume s o f Tes t Personne l PAG E NO . 1 2 4 5 6 7 8

80-6 5 MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC .P.1 3

FUE L GA S ANALYSI S LAGLORI AOI L 5 GA S COMPAN Y TYLER , TEXA S FIL E NUMBE R 80-6 5

INTRODUCTION
Mullin s Environmenta l Testin g Co. , Inc. , Dallas , Texas , conducte d samplin g a t L a Glori a Oi l 6 Ga s Compan ylocate d i n Tyler , Texas , o n Novembe r 20 , 1980 . Th e purpos e o f thes e test s wa s t o determin e th e concentration s o f hydroge n sulfid e i n th e fue l ga s stream .
Th e samplin g followe d th e procedure s se t fort hi n Appendi xAt o th e Cod e o f Federa l Regulations , Titl e 40 , Chapte r I , Par t 60 .

80-6 5 -1
- MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC .



## „P.1 4

SUMMARY O F RESULT S
Th e principa l conclusio n i s a s follows :
Th e concentratio n o f hydroge n sulfid e i n th e fue l ga s streamwa s equa l t o 12. 5 milligram s pe r drystandar d cubi c meter , base d o n th e averag e o f thre e test s consistin g o f tw o sample s i n eac htest . Th e allowabl e concentratio n i s 23 0 milligram s pe r drystandar d cubi c meter . Th e concentratio n o f hydroge n sulfid e i n th e fue l ga s stream wa s 5. 4 percen t o f th e allowabl e concentration .

80-6 5 -2- MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC .
ii_iMU-^«M»awim_,i^ ^_____ _

l ^ 'Vi i
SUMMARY O F RESULT S Hydroge n Sulfid e



# J j j J J j 

# 1

. 1 I Ru

n No . Sampl e


### N l Vj , m l % V- , m l V j Blank , m l V s Blank , m l V , liter s m, ' st d C H 2 S » mg/dsc m Av ~ C H 2 S 

### 1
A 0.0099 6 

### 5 0 0.0099 6 47. 0 

### 5 0 49. 5 16.65 7 25. 5 

### B 0.0099 6 

### 5 0 0.0099 6 48. 4 

### 5 0 49. 5 14.88 3 12. 5 19. 0 

### 2

A 0.0099 6 

### 5 0 0.0099 6 48. 8 

### 5 0 49. 5 15.39 4 

### 7. 7 

### B 0.0099 6 

### 5 0 0.0099 6 49. 0 

### 5 0 49. 5 15.42 3 

### 5. 5 6. 6 

### 3

A 0.0099 6 

### 5 0 0.0099 6 48. 7 

### 5 0 49. 5 15.05 3 

### 9. 0 

### B 0.0099 6 

### 5 0 0.0099 6 48. 2 

### 5 0 49. 5 14.85 1 14. 9 12. 0

C H 2 S = K (V-N
- - VgNg)sampl e - (V-N
- - VgNg)blan k



### m std 4. ? 

### S K * Vl N l 

# v s N S mst d Concentratio n o f H 2 S a t standar d conditions , mg/dsc m

Conversio n facto r = 17.0 4 x10 ^ Volum e o f standar d iodin e solution , m l Normalit yo f standar d iodin e solutio n Volum e o f standar d sodiumthiosulfat e solution , m l Normalit yo f standar d sodiumthiosulfat e solutio n Dr yGa s Volum e a t standar d conditions , liter s

80-6 5 MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. . INC .P.1 6 fry \ m W \

it v'

tt vJJ

DISCUSSIONO F RESULT S

Th e result s o f tw o test s wer e withi n th e limit s o f detectabilit y ( 8 mg/dsc m- 74 0 mg/dscm) . On e tes t fel l belo wth e lowe r limi t o f detectabilit yo f th e metho d a s describe d i n Appendi xAo f th e Cod e o f Federa l Regulations , Titl e 40 , Chapte r I , Par t 60 .
Th e test s appeare d t o b e vali d representation s o f th e actua l con centration s o f hydroge n sulfid e i n th e fue l ga s stream . Al l leak check s befor e an

d afte r samplin g wer e withi n the acceptabl e limit s o f th e method .


# 1 ' J 

# ] 3 ] ] ] 80-6 5 _4 _ MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC .P.1 7 (TT A (17 v



# .] . 

# 1 1 1 3 DESCRIPTIONO F SAMPLINGLOCATION

Sample s wer e take n a t ground leve l froma valv e on the fue l ga s line .

80-6 5 -5
- MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC . ll.L-__ll .,l„_lH_l_IWm'i_LLlL .V__h_________ / vv v-*-

SAMPLIN GAND ANALYTICA L PROCEDURE S
Th e samplin g followe d th e procedures:outline d i n Metho d 1 1 i n th e Appendi xt o th e Cod e o f Federa l Regulations , Titl e 40 , Chapte r I , Par t 60 .
Al l sample s wer e take n fo r fiftee n minute s a t a rat e o f approximatel y on e lite r pe r minute . Followin g eac htes t th e sampl e trai n wa s purge d fo r fiftee n minute s wit hambien t ai r drawn througha tub e o f activate d charcoa l a t th e same rat e a s th e sampl e wa s taken .
Th e sampl e trai n wa s leak-checke d unde r pressur e befor e an d afte r eac h test . Thi s wa s performe d t o predetermin e th e possibilit yo f a dilute d sample .
Th e concentratio n o f hydroge n sulfid e i n th e sample s wa s determine d o n sit e iodometrically .

80-6 5 MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC .P.1 9

DESCRIPTIONO R TEST S
Personne l arrive d a t th e plan t a t 11:3 0 a.m . on Thursday , Novembe r 20 , 1980 . Th e equipmen t wa s se t up fo r testing hydroge n sulfid e i n th e fue l ga s an

d th e firs t tes t fo r hydroge n sulfid e bega n a t 2:2 1 p.m . Testin g continue d withou t difficult yunti l completio n o f th e thir d tes t a t 6:1 3 p.m . Th e sample s wer e recovere d an d analyze d o n site . Th e equipmen t wa s secure d fo r th e nigh t a t 7:3 0 p.m .
O n Friday , Novembe r 21 , wor k bega n a t 8:0 0 a.m . Th e equipmen t wa s se t up o n th e FC C Stac k and wa s prepare d fo r testing . I t wa s decide d bypian t personne l t o postpon e furthe r testing du e t o operationa l problem s wit hth e electrostati c precipitator . Th e equipmen t wa s move d of f th e stac k an d loade d int o th e samplin g van . 

# I I 1
! Operation s a t th e La Glori a Oi l § Ga s Compan yrefineryi n Tyler , Texa s wer e complete d a t 11:0 0 a.m . o n Friday , Novembe r 21 , 1980 .

Bill yJ . Mullins , Jr. , K.E . Presiden t 80-6 5 MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC .
_s-________

cVJ_ »/ vi i iu

APPENDICE S

A . Calibratio n Dat a B . Fiel d Testin g Dat a C . Chai n o f Custod y D . Resume s o f Tes t Personne l

80-6 5 

# 1 - 8 - MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. . INC .P.2 1

Vii . / Vii .

APPENDI X A
Calibratio n Dat a Equipmen t Calibratio n Facto r DryGa s Mete r # 3 1.00 0 Calibratio n Dat e 10/31/8 0



# L 80-6 5 MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC .

. .P.2 2 ft \ fit

Vf.
Vi____ /



### DRYGA S METE RCALIBRATION Mete r Number : 3 Date : 

# lo/aif o Calibrator : 4>V.J r

### )•.• \\ *X<-J \ A< 7s 

# ~^7 ~ ^ T

We tTes tMete rVm Calibratio nFacto r (C-.,, ) Db


## Ru nNo : 1 £ . \.0 st d Dry Ga s Mete r V



## m st d

En d Star t Tim

e IH' 6 I<AO£ 

### We

t Tes t Mete r Mete r Readin g Temp . Lr,U<6ic f



### ^3.0° F
o. O c f

13>,0 O F 

# V . 1°..L^ "H g Contro l Modul e Vacuu m 3> . 3> "Hg



## ' m Mete r

Readin g DryGa

s Mete r Temp . I nOut '

m


## c f 13),0 O 

### F

## -z.K"H2 0 zil.Lol __!

_i_r L__L__2___1 H 

## 2 ° LlpS^c f



## 12.0- ?

## -2^S*.. H 

## , o k.^Mc f °l 2o 

## F8 4 «>

Fj , O "H ?



## 0

We t Tes t Mete r V

= 17.6 5 xL.fag! st d DryGa s Mete rV= 17.6 5 x^.K 1



### m st d 

## • _L_H \



# \s s + 46 0

# / 2°|.6 M + 13. 6 \ x|,ot> l ^.S ^ dsc f q ^ • 460 /

(C f 

### )



## = I.^IPH 

## dsc f

'D G 

## t»S1 7 6>.Ht L 

## » 

# /.o n
J MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. . INC .P.2 3

4T H QUARTE R EXCES S EMISSION S REPOR T Period s o f Exces s H? S Conten t i n th e RefineryFue l Ga s 1 . Th e sulfu r recoveryplan t wa s down betwee n 7:0 0 a.m . 10-1-8 4 and 7:3 0 a.m . 11-5-8 4 fo r th e plan t turnaround . Th e # 2 delaye d coke r and th e FCCU , whic h produc e th e bul k o f th e plant' s sour gas , wer e down betwee n 7:0 0 a.m . 10-1
- 8 4 and 7:0 0 p.m . 11-5-84 . Betwee n 10-8-8 4 an d 10-30-84 , th e res t o f th e plan t wa s down fo r turnaround . Therefore , th e ga s whic hcoul d hav e con taine d H2 S wa s produce d o n a muc hreduce d scale , bu t no t sweetened , betwee n 10-1-8 4 an

d 10-8-8 4 an

d agai n betwee n 10-30-8 4 an d 11-5-84 . Th e H 2 S monito r char t fo r th e perio d 7:0 0 a.m . 10-1-8 4 unti l 4:0 0 p.m . 10-2-8 4 wa s abov e our complianc e limi t o f 23 0 mg/dscm . N o char t wa s availabl e fo r th e perio d be
twee n 4:0 0 p.m . 10-2-8 4 and 10-8-84 . Th e char t fo r th e perio d 8:0 0 a.m . 11-1-8 4 t o 4:0 0 a.m . 11-6-8 4 als o recorde d H2 S conten t greate r than 23 0 mb/dscm . 2 . Th e SRUwa s down betwee n 9:0 0 p.m . 11-11-8 4 an d 9:0 0 a.m . 11-12-8 4 du e t o a proble ma t th e sou r wate r stripper . N o char t fro mth e H2 S monito r i s availabl e becaus e th e lea d acetat e pape r ha d run out , therefor e n o measur e o f th e fue l ga s H2 S conten t i s available . 3 . Th e SRUwa s down betwee n 8:0 0 a.m . an d 7:0 0 p.m . 11-30-8 4 du e t o a flam e senso r proble mi n th e wast e hea t boile r o f th e SRU . N o char t fromthe H2 S monito r i s availabl e becaus e th e lea d acetat e pape r ha d ru n out , therefor e n o measur e o f th e fue l ga s H2 S conten t i s available . 4 . Th e SRUwa s down betwee n 7:3 0 p.m . 12-9-8 4 an d 6:0 0 p.m . 12-10-8 4 du e t o bearin g vibratio n o n on e o f th e conbustio n ai r blowers . Th e spar e blowe r wa s ou t o f servic e du e t o a bearin g whic hhad bee n runnin g hot . N o char t fromth e H2 S monito r i s availabl e becaus e th e lea d acetat e pape r had run out , therefor e n o measur e o f th e fue l ga s H2 S conten t i s available .

# Ik/ 1 T7 T

v vJ t uJ - P.2 4



### DR YGA S METE RCALIBRATIO

N Mete r Numbe r 

# : 3 Calibrato r Date : 10>/_>I | 

### j?

P

We t Tes t Mete r V 

### m Calibratio n Facto r (C DG 

### ) = 

### st d Dr yGa s Mete r V ,



### m st d
Ru n No : 

# ^ O.S " 29 . <W "H g Contro l Modul e Vacuu m2 . 2 "H

g We t Tes t Mete r Mete r Tim e Readin

g Temp . 

### ' m Mete r Readin g Dr yGa s Mete r Temp . In Ou t 

### ' m En d,qo ^ C.ZMrc f ^. ^ -^°" H 

### 2 ° 3"7J.3_T3c f V ° F? 4 ' FO, S "H 2 

### 0 Star t /S-T o O. o c f

7Z.-7 F-) t 

### qQ"H 7 

### 0 3-±^Jj£_il

__£o

_Q,£ " "H? 0 S.2H^ c 

### f

7 

### *.S° F"I.TO-H O 

### S.zl l C 

### f ^ W^ 2 o 

### F°<$"H 2 

### 0 We t Tes t Mete r V _ m = 17.6 5 x£ ( 

### 2 H £ st d Dr y Ga s Mete r V = 17.6 5 x^.11°\ m st d f l^.bl *13. 6 A \%b *46 0 /

2<,,(W+ 13. 6 \

xj.oo l -^.HSdsc f 72. b + 460 J (C f 

### )



## = S,^ ^ dsc f


# £.H C 'D G £,0(j>-\ 

## I.02.2 -

MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC .
pm.i-u'-wijjjjjMMM-iUp mP.2 5 

# K/ l 

# E n* • *



### Mete r Number : ^ Date : \pj\ i I

Ho DR

YGA S METE RCALIBRATIO

N ; Calibrator : \j\>l LK *&o3U c

We t Tes t Mete r V m Calibratio n Facto r (C^- ) = U u 

### st d DryGa s Mete r V



### mst d 

## Ru nNo : l@. ' /

, g ~ 2%'+-!

We t Tes t Mete r Mete r Time Readin

g Temp . 

### "H g

'r o Contro l Modul e Vacuu m2, . "H

g Dr yGa s Mete r Mete r Temp . Readin g In Ou t _ •m 

### En dmil. IhOlb c f TZ,CO F 

### . i>iS 

### -"H 2 

### 0 2><fa28Hc f ^'" F^ Z



### ° F/ , ^ "H 2 

### 0 Star t /q_/8

_0.0c f

fosT'F'3,Su"H 7 

### 0 S??, ^ <?3 > JL L/.S & "H 9 

### 0 ll.02C»c f

73._T° F' 3 

### ' S 

### 3'»H 2 

### 0 ;i-2S^c f ?H° F8 3 « F

### ^ D 

### " H 2 

### 0
We t Tes t Mete r V

= 17.6 5 x/|,OZ0 » m 

### st d
DryGa s Meter V

= 17.6 5 x/) . st d 

### 'i___t' l , a 2%u><-)*13. 6 \ x(.co ? = /c> 

### .g|L/ dsc f ll. S + 46 0 J(C f 

### ) 

# ii . 2°t.6>W + 13. 6 ^ = /o.l^ S dsc f 9" l 

## ~Ss Y

## ^^ L 

## ) + 13.6 

## N = /0. 1 \ 9" 1 * 46

0 /
/O.& N 'D G /o.-?6>_ »

^ 

## -QQ S

MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC .
W«J^_«WW.MJW-_-y i AA'!I.WBy»^B| i

# IK/1

Mete r Numbe r Date : ) 

## o/si/g o DR Y GAS METE R CALIBRATIO N Calibrato r 

# :^A\VA:.

( i \i [>j.Cy -.;



### We t Tes t Mete r V ,



### m Calibratio n Facto r CC nr 

### 0 = 

### st d Dr yGa s Mete r V ,



### m st d 

## Ru nNo : j® 2.0

We t Tes t Mete r Mete r Time Reading Temp . 

# 2=.,1 3 "H g

' m Contro l Modul e Vacuu m3. 8 "H

g DryGa s Mete r 

### Mete r Temp . Readin g I nOu t _ ' m 

### En d Star t m i/O.I Uc f 73,£°F-^/S*"H 2 

### 0 U0 

### | . o 

### /oc f <.<-/° F2 0 ° F2 

### .O"H 2 

### 0 IHlC O.O c f

?S.b°F-^.sC"H 7 

### 0 jfr.k6 S Ji i _M . 2> 0 "H 9 

### 0 10.1^ 1 c f 

### ^3.r. F 

### "«-l,S-3„ H 2 0

### Jo.Uo^c f ^ t 

### ' ° F?2s 

### F2 

### ' ° "H 2 

### 0
We t Tes t Mete r V

_ 

### m = 17.6 5 x st d Dr y Gas Mete r

V = 17.6 5 x|o . Ho£ m st d , ( 2 c 

### ..6>3 , » 13. 6 \ x| . 

## I

## 7S- C + 46

0 

## J( f 2°l.f,$ + 13. 6 \ \ 9 « + 460 / 00°\ = l^qldsc f (C £

### J



## = Vf ^ dsc f

.


## V H 2 'D G 

## ^ - ° i 9 ^ P.^ k

MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. . INC .P.2 7 (TJ W v



### Mete r Number : Date : )oj\lfeo DRYGA S METE RCALIBRATIO N Calibrato r 

# = gy,a . 0 %J$.M,

^ r

Calibratio nFacto r (C nJ) We t Tes t Mete r V 

### m st d Dr y Ga s Mete r V



### m st d 

## Ru n No : j @ g, , O 

# V

- 2°i,U 3 "H g Contro l Modul e Vacuu m ^/ . O "H

g We t Tes t Mete r Mete r Tim e Readin g Temp . 

### ' m Mete r

Reading 

### Dr

y Gas Mete r Temp . I nOu t '

m En d IMS' o 

### lO.-Ll^cf

7 ^ •F-S.'.S * "H 2 

### 0 -4,12.11 b <-£ * ^ ° F

### !Z

° F

### 2>.°" H 

### 2 ° Star t }UUo O.O c f

l L 

### l°¥- (p,Q "H 7 

### 0 t/O/kS ZV± 8 2 3, 0 "H? 0 ,0,71t <

### c f

7' / °F'^ 8 

### " H 2 

### 0 l^^ y C 

### f ^ ° F8 ° ° F3, 0 "H 2 

### 0 We t Tes t Mete r V _ m = 17.6 5 x /0-21 M st d 2%l*3> • 13. 6 ^ x/.oo" ? = 10.OOL&scf ,^+ 46 0 J(C. ) Dr y Ga s Mete r V m = 17.6 5 x)0>S~S L 

### st d y 8 7 + 46 0 / 0.|6> S dsc f

'D G 10,002-

/o.i_> : 

# o,^ 1

MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. . INC .

«Mf l

# IK/ I >

.. . _ P.2 8
1 •

ri /



### DRYGA S METE RCALIBRATION Mete r Number : J> Date : Calibrato r 

# " ic>l%>l%< >


## ^ 0

We t Tes t Mete r Vm Calibratio nFacto r (C__ ) = DG St d Dry Ga s Mete r V



## m st d
RunNo : 

## <

? 4. o p • 

## 2-V.pl > Contro l Modul e Vacuu m 3>-~ 7 _"H

g "Hg We t Tes t Mete r Mete r Tim e Readin gTemp . 

### ' n Mete r Readin g Dr

y Gas Mete r Temp . I nOut m En d/O.S"l ° c f 7 M ° F-l.^S n 

### H 2 

### 0 ^2M-oSO c 

### f t 

### -\ ° F^" FM-O"H 2 

### 0 

## Star t /qq b 6, Qcf

^ ' F-3.kS"H ? 

## 0 M/3_2i_S

_I£

_3LL M- Q"H? 

## 0 to.Sio c f 

## moF

## -l.fro„ H 0

## /^g^ b c f 

## C]b»F* ° °

FM.d>»H

2 

## 0
We t Tes t Mete r V = 17.6 5 x /0 

### . £ , st d Dr y Ga s Mete r V m

### = 17.6 5 x|0,g2» $ f 2 

### % k ^ Z^63 » 13. 6 | x/,o o

?<•/ + 46 0 J(C f 

### ;

) -/6.HOdsc f

st d 

## f

2<j.fo£* 13.6 \ \# 2+ 46

0 / • )


## = fD»HH3) dsc f

'DG 

## to. fl O /a«-/w 3 M

1U>

MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. . INC .P.2 9 (tt T h



### APPENDI XB
Fiel d Testin g Dat a



# 1 80-6 5 MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC .P.3 0 

## La.^oc'i<\ ° M Co.
•20lOour^SfcR
- %o 

# \\x 

# <3 A4etVo d\ V

i±L__l X /vnt.a i l^tft.^2c( L___£ 1 

## £^jWU J yy^cA 

## Pu.^ « ""* • *\TA CyX*. "»- ' 

# L l J f.'vJl

^JXAl l ft •

- 6 6 L-CL 

# 2 1^< "



# 6 1

__^ i 

# 67 7" / »VL <



# I 

# Jy^-df! * ^ ^ * ** n

# X^ M «^ ~ - u t



# */~ : 

# J — J J ^fx j ^.A- i toz&^ 

## P a 

## , f 

## Vx^-ifZiiili ? /UA&- T***(> r*0*Jr FivA-_y 

# <H«f.l M __2_ L-31 -

• 7 2 . I

W | t.'(Vj ) ^ P PCy*l«y<*y 

## iT.l U0. 0 0 t,+4»yy^

f)*vc£



### * I.O0 G - 0,^3- 6 cC



## - , 14.1*3 JLV - l v P.3 1 

# ^ U^jZ- A 

# .^eh Q 

# : —/ - P*rj * t o _Xl____i_2i= ^ 

# Pi^JLiir "
I UITM L^ 

### 0,$ 4 I O 

# TV Ut-iiSAi : v

# J^££ . O.^ 3


## - 

## c C 

# ^ i 54 

## ^ 53 

## ° ^0.03 6 acc ^ l.** 6 jt/j

\ 

# 3 tvv ^ Mf-f7» » I y+'y\ji.'T

\.yy*. 

## F.ui i @ lli i ev^U a 

## 0 <£__!___c^/^ '

6 4 

# T.w

^ PA2^gg
6~ ? 

# M l - 6 1 . .4 . 6>< ? ^jjsJjL DcS^]_c ^ 

# •jpU ) ffi£!i l

# * i°P D 

# - _£
^ > A..H " ? J»_i « * % f- ^~ ^ - (i^. ^ 0,Gll£ - eJ U•=. . I.OJLf T^ /

j

# 7 f P.3 2 

# 1 f^Atiir 11 3 1-17^

<_ ^ y «


# 1 A

# i)r y^ Ki ^ [ £_Jj J illl_l_ J | XiAJ

__£_LS_____

- 

# }^jM -Jh&&*~<J°° 0 I K

J Q-Ay 

## "7_ A ^ •£*.** -

*\ . 

## *r o - P.tS ' ^

0_£2 l 

# - 7 ^ , _^1_ ^ ^I_«i- « 0, 0 3 5 ols* « i

« . 

# -ti n 0,51 4 ^

,6 ^

JJJ5± Lol> 

# 1

* K ~ —— • 

### 6XA 

# 1 O.QXCS My * Ad^- 

# A ~J/~P.3 3

. N . _

» J..

APPENDI X C
Chai n o f Custod

y

80-6 5 MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC . 

### JP.3 4 

### MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA

LTESTIN

GCO. , INC . Chai no f

Custod y Jo b Numbe

r %Q-/fl> C Jo b Nam e L,<- A(-}\C*C\C\ 

### 0\ \L

- (DUS, 

### 0-^0'=^^\ Locatio n~Ty,\^ r

" \9^n s Uni t Teste dpu. ) G^ c SaPfau i Date(s ) Sample d 

# \\hoh° Numbe r o f Test s UA\ I

Descriptio n Fron t Was h Bac k Was h Impinge r No . 1 Impinge r No . 2 Impinge r No . 3 Filte r Containe r Sampl e Container s No . o f Container s 

### Remark s

/"-/M O 

### Sampl eNo . ]_£

_Recovere dby : U^,U.__'l : Ucj$^||te : tl/zg/ftjime : , < ^ Location : 0l A

### C,A P Sampl eNo . 2 ARecovere dby : ^\o f 

### Y U A

### K bL^^gfte s />/WgoTime : nt o Location : o ^ <.A f

_e ; 

### /i/2o/^Time : /y ^ Location : ^ <_^Ae _ Sampl eNo . ? , t



### o , Recovere dby : l^^y ^ j / ^ M 

## ( 3 

## " Sample s Receive d by : Sample s Receive d a t La bby Sample s Analyze d by : 

# fr.p \zkfo.
/il lS.c~w.p/e-S . c-_wcJl- | t_ Jov \_.j r 

### fo r Transpor t

Date : Date : Dat e Time : — Time : — : 

# lll?o/\

KJI. 

### Time : l L 

### }HO- l°[P.3 5

\________ s ' " "•

APPENDI X D

Resume s o f Tes t Personne l

80-6 5 MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC .P.3 6

MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC . P.O . Bo x59 8 Addison , T

x7500 1 (214)960-184 3 U__ _

BILL Y J . MULLINS , JR. , Presiden t
Educatio n Pos t Graduat e Studyi n Environmenta l Engineerin g a t

Souther n Methodis t University , Dallas , Texas , 1970 . M.S . 1969 , Ne wYor k University , Ne wYork , Ne wYork , i n Civi l Engineerin g (Ai r Resources) . B.S . 1968 , Texa s Tec hUniversity , Lubbock , Texas , i n Civi l Engineerin g (Wate r Resources) . Studie s i n Engineerin g a t U.S . Nava l Academy , Annapolis , Maryland , 1963-1964 . Professiona l Trainin g Course s Attende d Shor t Cours e o n Ai r Pollutio n Engineerin g a t

th e Universit yo f Texa s a t Austin , Februar y1970 . Attende d four-wee k managemen t cours e presente d byth e America n Managemen t Association , 1976 . Certificatio n Registere d Professiona l Enginee r

Certifie d Visibl e Emission s Evaluato r Certifie d Fallou t Shelte r Analys t License d Privat e Pilo t (Singl e Engine-Land ) Professiona l Membership s Ai r Pollutio n Contro l Associatio n - Pas t Chairman , Southwes t Sectio n Sourc e Evaluatio n Societ y America n Societ yo f Civi l Engineer s Texa s Societ yo f Professiona l Engineer s Nationa l Societ yo f Professiona l Engineer s America n Managemen t Associatio n Technica l Associatio n o f th e Pul p an d Pape r Industry Technica l Directe d and performe d stac k samplin g o n ove r 60 0 Experienc e source s o f whic hove r 6 0 wer e sample d simultaneousl y

usin g mor e tha n on e sampling trai n a t severa l point s i n th e flu e ga s stream . 1972-present . Directe d and performe d ove r 7 0 short-termambien t ai r studie s usin g mobil e samplin g van s an d variou s ambien t ai r samplin g equipment . 1972-present .

MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC .P.3 7
iV Tt

\

J W. Jll


### Mullin s

Researc h Project s

Publication s Designed , directe d an d operate d ove r 2 0 permanen t ambien t ai r network s o f variou s siz e an d duratio n fo r a variet yo f parameters . 1972-present . Designe d surfac e an d underground drainag e system s fo r residentia l subdivisions , publi c work s projects , and shoppin g centers . '•. 1969-1972 . Designe d severa l residentia l subdivision s includin g lo t layout , stree t design , drainag e design , and utilit ydesign . 1969-1972 . Supervise d and conducte d a stud ymad e b

yth e Hawaiia n Suga r Planters ' Associatio n t o characteriz e th e emission s fo r severa l bagasse-fire d boilers . April-May1976 . Supervise d and conducte d a stud ymad e b

yth e Ri o Grand e Valle ySuga r Growers , Inc . t o determin e th e are a affecte d byth e burnin g o f sugarcan e field s prio r t o harvesting . Novembe r 1974-Apri l 1975 . Supervise d an

d conducte d a stud yb ya lightweigh t aggregat e manufacture r t o develo p a materia l balanc e around th e proces s throughsampling an d analysi s o f severa l parameters . Novembe r 1973 . Conducte d a studyi n Ne wYor k Cit yt o attemp t t o de
velo p a correlatio n i n th e ambien t ai r betwee n carbo n dioxid e and sulfu r dioxid e t o provid e a too l fo r predictin g ai r pollutio n episodes . January-Ma y1969 . Co-authore d "Sulfu r Compound Emission s o f th e Petroleu m Productio n Industry, " Decembe r 1974 . Co-authore d "Fiel d Procedur e fo r Stabilizin g Hydroge n Sulfid e Sample s t o b e Analyze d Using Modifie d Methylen e Blu e Technique, " presente d a t th e Conferenc e o n Ambien t Ai r Qualit yMeasurements , Austin , Texas , Marc h1975 . Co-authore d "Atmospheri c Emission s Surve yo f th e Sou r Ga s Industry, " Octobe r 1975 . Co-authore d "Techniqu e fo r Insuring th e Validit yo f Sample s fo r Hig hConcentration s o f Sulfu r Dioxid e Usin g th e EP AMetho d 5 Samplin g Train, " presente d a t th e Thir d Nationa l Conferenc e on Energyan d th e Environment , Colleg e Corner , Ohio , Septembe r 1975 . MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC .(TJ \

Mullin s Teachin g Serve d a s a lecture r i n th e Environmenta l Protectio n Experienc e Agency' s trainin g cours e numbe r 450 , "Sourc e Samplin g

fo r Particulat e Pollutants " fo r tw o year s from Januar y197 4 t o Octobe r 1975 . Conducte d a two-daytraining cours e entitle d "Technica l Assistanc e i n Sourc e Sampling " a t Iowa Stat e University , Ames , Iowa fo r th e Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Octobe r 1974 . Conducte d EPA' s trainin g cours e numbe r 450 , "Sourc e Samplin g fo r Particulat e Pollutants " fo r th e EP Aa t Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolina , Septembe r 1975 . Conducte d a two-dayshor t cours e entitle d "Performin g and Observin g Sourc e Sampling " a t Dallas , Texas , Jul y1976 , Ma y1977 , Octobe r 1977 ; a t Lak e Charles , Louisiana , Ma y1977 ; an d a t Casper , Wyoming , Ma y1977 . Serve d a s a lecture r i n th e Environmenta l Protectio n Agency' s two-daysemina r entitle d "Asphal t Industry Environmenta l Solutions, " presente d i n Dallas , Texa s o n Marc h2 1 and 22 , 1979 .

MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. . INC .P.3 9 MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC . P . 0 Bo x59 8 Addison . Texas 7500 1 •(214) 980-1843 v______ / Vii . 

# r

DO

NC . ALEXANDER , Fiel d Technicia n Educatio n B.S . 1978 , Angel o Stat e University , San Angelo ,

Texas , i n Biologywit ha mino r i n Chemistry . Technica l Participate d i n th e sampling o f ove r 15 0 sources , Experienc e including severa l whic hwer e sample d simultaneousl y

usin g mor e tha n on e sampling train .

MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC .P.4 0 MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC . P.O . Bo x598 Addison . T

x7500 1 (214)980-184 3

DOUGLA S RA

Y SAATHOFF , Environmenta l Technicia n
Educatio n B.S . 1978 , Th e Universit yo f Texa s a t Austin ,

Austin , Texas , i n Biolog ywit ha mino r i n Chemistry . Technica l Researc hAssistan t a t Th e Universit yo f Texa s Experienc e a t Por t Aransas , Summer s 197 6 an d 1977 . LaboratoryTechnicia n fo r Th e Texa s Stat e Departmen t o f Health , Dallas , Texas . Participate d i n th e samplin g o f ove r 5 0 sources , and analysi s o f commercia l cylinde r gase s o f Nitri c Oxid e an

d Sulfu r Dioxide . On e yea r experienc e wit hEP Aan d Texa s Ai r Contro l Boar d method s o f analysi s o f bot h sourc e an

d ambien t ai r sample s fo r particulates , S0 2 , S0 3 , H2SO4 , H2S , HCl , CI2 , an d N0 X . Bot h laboratoryan

d on-sit e analysi s performed .

MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC .P.4 1

MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC . P.O . Bo x598 Addison . T

x7500 1 (214)980-1843 ___ _ 

## liLJ U

RANDY PIPKA , Environmenta l Fiel d Technicia n
Educatio n B.S . 1976 , St . Anselm' s College , Manchester ,

Ne wHampshire , i n Biologywit ha mino r i n Chemistry . Technica l On e yea r sourc e an d persona l sampling wit hRS R Experienc e Corporation . Sinc e joining METCO , ha s participate d

i n th e sampling o f ove r 3 0 sources .

MULLIN S ENVIRONMENTA L TESTIN G CO. , INC .P.4 2



# L AGLORIA© Oi l an d Ga s Compan yP . O
. BO XMO , 

## ma , TEXA

S 

## 7571 0 A TEXA S EASTER N COMPAN Y

February7 , 198 5

Mr . Sabin O Gome z Complianc e Divisio n TEXA S AI R CONTRO L BOARD 633 0 Hwy . 29 0 Eas t Austin , Texa s 7872 3 Dea r Mr . Gomez : Attache d i s L a Glori a Oi l an d Ga s Company' s writte n repor t o f exces s emission s ou r Tyle r Refineryfo r th e fourt hquarte r o f 1984 . Appropriat e measure s ar e being take n t o assur e tha t bot hou r H2 S monito r an d our opacit ymonito r ar e measurin g an d recording thei r respectiv e stream s a s muc ho f th e time a s i s possible . Pleas e contac t u s a t (214 ) 595-451 1 i f furthe r infor
matio n i s required . Than k yo u fo r you r cooperation . Your s ver ytruly ,
Alvi e R . Livermore , P.E . Manage r o f Engineerin g PFF:a b Attachmen t pc : Richar d Leard , TAC BP.4 3

4T HQUARTE

REXCES S EMISSION S REPOR T H? S Monito r

Operatio nSummar

y 

### 1 . Betwee n5:0 0 p.m . 10-2-8 4 and8:0 0 a.m . 11-1-84 , th eH 2 

### S monito r a t th e fue lga s mixin g drumwa s ou t o f recorde r

char t paper . 2 . Betwee n9:0 0 p.m . 11-11-8 4 an d8:0 0 A.M . 11-12-84 , th emonitor' s lea d acetat epape r

hadru nout . Therefor en o measur eo f th eH2 S conten t

o f th efue lga s i s availabl efo r thi s tim eperiod . 3 . Betwee n2:0 0 p.m . and4:4 5 p.m . o n11-14-8 4 th echar t recorder' s pape r wa s remove ds o tha t

copie s coul db emad eo f it . Th ecopie s wer et o b e par t o f arepor t

t o th eTAC

B regiona loffic ea s par t o f ou r annua l inspection . 4 . Betwee n7:3 0 p.m . on11-24-8 4 an d2:0 0 p.m . 11-30-84 , th emonitor' s lea d acetat epape r

ha dru nout . Therefor en o measur eo f th eH2 S conten t

o f th efue lga s i s availabl efo r thi s tim eperiod . 5 . Betwee n2:0 0 P.M . 11-30-8 4 an d10:0 0 a.m . 12-4-84 , th eH 2 

### S monito r a t th efue lga s mixin g dru mwa s ou t

o f recorde r

char t paper . 6 . Betwee n10:0 0 a.m . 12-4-8 4 an dmidnigh t o n12-31-84 , th emonitor' s lea d acetat epape r

ha dru nout . Therefor en o measur eo f th eH2 S conten t

o f th efue lga s i s availabl efo r thi s tim eperiod .