alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Francisco Molina, Plaintiff, *v.*Hydraulic Press Manufacturing Company, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

September 28, 1956.

*Marvin Koch & Montfort*for defendant.

*John Russell O’Reilly*for plaintiff.

Charles J. Beckinella, J.

This is a motion by the defendant, an Ohio corporation, to vacate the summons served upon it upon the grounds (a) that the defendant is a foreign corporation not doing business within the State of New York and (b) that the person upon whom the disputed service was made is not a person upon whom such service may be made pursuant to section 229 of the Civil Practice Act. As to the latter contention, it is immaterial who was served if the Ohio corporation is not doing business in New York *(Ultramar Co.*v. *Minerals Separation,*236 N. Y. 647).

The challenged process was served upon Mr. Thomas Gf. Bishop, the sales manager of the Plastic Machinery Division of *225the defendant while he was present at a display set np by the defendant at a four-day plastics exposition at the Coliseum in Manhattan. The defendant maintains no place of business in the State of New York. The Manhattan Classified Telephone Directory lists the defendant twice as being located at Teaneck, New Jersey. The defendant had a telephone at the Coliseum during the four-day exposition. At its exhibit at the Coliseum four officers of the defendant were present and, it is stated by the attorney who served the summons upon Mr. Bishop, the eastern district sales manager of the defendant was willing to take an order for a machine manufactured by the defendant. The same attorney further swears that at the exhibit other employees of the defendant were available to take orders. Mr. Bishop, upon whom the summons was served is not an officer of the defendant.

Each case involving the question of whether a foreign corporation is doing business in this State so as to be subject to the jurisdiction of its courts, must be decided on its own particular facts *(Sterling Novelty Corp.*v. *Frank & Hirsch Distr. Co.,*299 N. Y. 208, 210). If the corporation is here “ not occasionally or casually, but with a fair measure of permanence and continuity, then, whether its business is interstate or local, it is within the jurisdiction of our courts [citing authority].” *(Tauza*v. *Susquehanna Coal Co.,*220 N. Y. 259, 267.)

There is nothing before the court which indicates that the defendant Ohio corporation’s business in New York was other than casual or occasional. Accordingly, it is not amenable to process *(Pennrich & Co.*v. *Juanita Hosiery Mills,*247 N. Y. 592; *Vassallo*v. *Slomin,*278 App. Div. 949). No issues are presented which warrant a reference under section 237-a (subd. 3, par [b]) of the Civil Practice Act. *(Wolf*v. *Globe Hoist Co.,*285 App. Div. 1167.)

The motion is granted. Settle order on notice.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29146]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, November 13, 2000, 2:00 pm to 
November 13, 2000, 4:00 pm, Holiday Inn--Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20814 which was published in the Federal Register 
on November 2, 2000, 65 FR 65870-65872.
    The meeting times have been changed to 4:00 pm-6:00 pm. The date 
and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: November 6, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-29146 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of TELEFÓNICA HOLDING DE ARGENTINA S.A. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, José María Alvarez Pallete López, Chairman,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                                     
|------ |  | ------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ José María Alvarez Pallete López
|Name:  |  | José María Alvarez Pallete López    
|Title: |  | Chairman                            



Date: April 19, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2033

TIMOTHY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FORCE PROTECTION INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED; HOWARD EISENHUT, 

individually and as an employee of Force Protection 

Industries Incorporated; SHELIA BOYD, individually and as an 

employee of Force Protection Industries Incorporated; 

VANESSA LADSON, individually and as an employee of Force 

Protection Industries Incorporated; HELEN GEARHEARD, 

individually and as an employee of Force Protection 

Industries Incorporated; BRENDA VALENTINE, individually and 

as an employee of Force Protection Industries Incorporated,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Margaret B. Seymour, District 

Judge. (2:07-cv-03679-MBS)

Submitted: April 7, 2010 Decided: April 23, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael D. Carrouth, FISHER 

& PHILLIPS, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Williams appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action alleging 

employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights 

Act of 1964, as amended, and raising related claims under state 

law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Williams v. Force Protection Industries Inc., No. 2:07-

cv-03679-MBS (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### McINTYRE v. STATE.

No. 22582.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 20, 1943.

Cunningham, Lipscomb & Cole, of Bon-ham, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction -is for selling whisky in Fan-nin County, which was alleged to be dry area. Punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

Appellant requested the court to direct a verdict of “not guilty,” and upon motion for new trial and upon this appeal insists that there was no evidence before the jury showing that Fannin County was dry area. This contention must be sustained.

The statement of facts was prepared by the trial judge. It is therein shown that the State placed the County Clerk of Fan-nin County upon the witness stand and had him read to the jury the order of the Commissioners’ Court of date May 15, 1903, directing the holding of an election in Fan-nin County to determine whether the sale of intoxicating liquor should be prohibited. He also had the Clerk read the order of the Commissioners’ Court which declared the result of said election to have been in favor of prohibition. It then appears that the certificate of publication of the result was not read to the jury, but that the State’s attorney asked appellant’s attorney if he wanted the certificate read, and appellant’s attorney replied that “so far as he was concerned he did not require the certificate to be read.”

There was no agreement that Fannin County was dry area, and no agreement that the certificate should be considered in evidence. Without proof that the order *733declaring the result of the election had been published as required by law the State had failed to sustain the averment that Fannin County was dry area. Watson v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 632, 122 S.W.2d 311; Davis v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 167 S.W.2d 523; Craig v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 167 S. W.2d 523; Cremona v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 172 S.W.2d 102.

The omission of the certificate of publication evidently arose from some misunderstanding between counsel for the State and counsel for appellant. This is unfortunate, but we must take the record as it comes to us. As it thus appears the certificate in question is shown in the evidence heard upon the motion for new trial, but is absent from the statement of facts upon the trial before the jury.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          29,589
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  490,991
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,855,370
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,541,324
<PP&E>                                       5,312,109
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,065,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,172,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,575,532
<BONDS>                                      4,703,470
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       484,601
<OTHER-SE>                                     609,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,172,616
<SALES>                                        900,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               900,796
<CGS>                                          721,538
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  721,538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               141,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             110,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (51,369)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (12,300)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (39,069)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (39,069)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3620 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3620

 To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, to allow local hiring 
                      for transportation projects.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 22, 2013

 Ms. Bass (for herself, Mr. Bishop of New York, Mr. Waxman, Ms. Hahn, 
    and Ms. Roybal-Allard) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, to allow local hiring 
                      for transportation projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Local Hire Act''.

SEC. 2. HIGHWAY PROJECTS.

    Section 112 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(h) Local Hiring.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, a State may establish local hiring bid specifications or 
        consider the hiring of local workers in the evaluation of bids 
        and proposals for a project under this title.
            ``(2) Definition.--For purposes of this subsection, the 
        term `local' means the geographic boundaries of a local area, 
        as defined by the contracting agency, in which the project is 
        located.''.

SEC. 3. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS.

    Section 5325 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(k) Local Hiring.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, a recipient of assistance under this chapter may establish 
        local hiring bid specifications or consider local hiring in the 
        evaluation of bids and proposals for a project under this 
        chapter.
            ``(2) Definition.--For purposes of this subsection, the 
        term `local' means the geographic boundaries of a local area, 
        as defined by the contracting agency, in which the project is 
        located.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 215 (Monday, November 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28434]



[[Page 66587]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of Citizen Advocacy Panel, Brooklyn District

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Brooklyn District Citizen Advocacy 
Panel will be held in Brooklyn, New York.

DATES: The meeting will be held Friday, December 8, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen Cain at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-
488-3555.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an operational meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held 
Friday, December 8, 2000, 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at the Internal 
Revenue Service Brooklyn Building located at 625 Fulton Street, 
Brooklyn, NY 11201. For more information or to confirm attendance, 
notification of intent to attend the meeting must be made with Eileen 
Cain. Mrs. Cain can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3555. The 
public is invited to make oral comments from 8:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on 
Friday, December 8, 2000. Individual comments will be limited to 5 
minutes. If you would like to have the CAP consider a written 
statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3555, or write Eileen 
Cain, CAP Office, P.O. Box R, Brooklyn, NY, 11201.
    The Agenda will include the following: various IRS issues.

    Note: Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could 
prevent effective advance notice.


    Dated: October 27, 2000.
M. Cathy Vanhorn,
Director, CAP, Communications & Liaison, Taxpayer Advocate Service.
[FR Doc. 00-28434 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
             
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                   $1,824,294
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                               242,718 
<ALLOWANCES>                                117,962 
<INVENTORY>                                  25,896
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          2,150,913
<PP&E>                                    1,255,008
<DEPRECIATION>                              630,752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            2,868,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       586,322
<BONDS>                                     218,476
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                 524,625
<COMMON>                                  7,692,198  
<OTHER-SE>                               (6,152,812)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              2,868,809
<SALES>                                   1,304,601
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          1,304,601 
<CGS>                                       141,424
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               141,424  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          2,185,427 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           23,376 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (1,008,998)
<INCOME-TAX>                             (1,008,998) 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (1,008,998)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0	
<NET-INCOME>                             (1,009,798) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 ( .28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 ( .28) 
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          39,207
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      100
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,615
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,504
<PP&E>                                          68,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          567,611
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     (469,958)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,882
<SALES>                                         13,536
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,536
<CGS>                                            1,494
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  352,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               142,785
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,558
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (529,284)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (529,284)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter ofCompass Systems & Sales, Inc. 2014-GL-70-0239 Judge Not Assigned
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

# RECEIVED JUL 

## 282015 HEARING DOCKET

Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby notifies the United States Department of Transportation, Office ofHearings, and the Respondent, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.204(b), that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the following attomey: Brian K. Khan Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 2300 East Devon Avenue, AGL-7H Des Plaines, lllinois 6001 8 P: 847/294-7652 f: 847/294-7498
All communications, notices, pleadings or documents are respectfully requested to be forwarded as follows: Brian K. Khan Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 2300 EastDevonAvenue, AGL-7H Des Plaines, lllinois 60018 p: 847/294-7652 f: 847/294-7498 Respectfi.J!ly submitted,

Brian K. Khan Attomey Dated: 

# 1-/7...t J2.-0 \ 

### I

6CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY that on this day a copy ofthe foregoing Notice ofAppearance was sent Overnight Mail as follows: Overnight Mail (one copy) Mr. Stuart A. Strasfeld, Esq. Roth Blair I00 E. Federal Street, Suite 600 Youngstown, Ohio 44503 Attorney for Respondent

I hereby certifY that onthis day copies ofthe foregoing Notice ofAppearance were sentvia Overnight Mail as follows:
Overnight Mail (Original and one Copy)

Date: 

## I /, 

## '7 ; .'}, '7 

# n r I Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2Wl000

Tan1my dner Legal Technician Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 2300 EastDevonAvenue, AGL-7 Des Plaines, Illinois 60018
7
EXHIBIT 32.1


                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                           TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                                     BY THE
              CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of LION, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2003, hereof (the
"Report"), each of David Stedman, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve Thomson,
Chief Financial Officer, of LION, Inc., a Washington corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuanT
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Form 10 - QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
         78o(d)); and

(2)      The information contained in the Form 10 - QSB fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


/s/ David Stedman                           /s/ Steve Thomson
------------------------                    -------------------------
David Stedman                               Steve Thomson

August 14, 2003                             August 14, 2003
------------------------                    -------------------------










                                        1