alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Arizona Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Arizona Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 1      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 2      | 1      | 1      | NA     | 0      | NA     | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
#### POWELL et al. v. CITY OF IRVINE et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 29, 1953.

Redwine & Redwine, Marcus C. Red-wine, Sr., and Marcus C. Redwine, Jr., Winchester, Kelly Kash, Irvine, for appellant.

Shumate & Shumate, H. M. Shumate and T. D. Shumate, Irvine, C. S. Landrum and C. E. Rice, Jr., Lexington, for appellee.

CLAY, Commissioner.

In 1952 the City of Irvine enacted an ordinance directing the closing of a portion of Madison Avenue between Railroad Street and Kirkland Avenue. Suit was filed pursuant to KRS 94.360, and the owners of property abutting on Madison Avenue within that block were made defendants. Their rights are not here involved.

Appellants sought to intervene in the suit, alleging among other things that: they owned property on Madison Avenue both north and south of the block wherein the closure was directed; they were interested and necessary parties; they were being inconvenienced and damaged; the closing constituted the. taking of their private property without due process of law; and they were entitled to compensation. The Chancellor denied appellants the right to intervene, and adjudged that the portion of the street be closed.

This is a special statutory proceeding, and the necessary parties to the suit are governed by KRS 94.360. It provides that after the adoption of an ordinance closing a portion of a public way, an action shall be instituted and the defendants to such action shall be “All the owners of ground in the square or lots divided by that public way, or the portion proposed to be closed, * * * ”,

Appellants contend that necessary parties under that statute are all persons who live anywhere on the street of which a portion is being closed. They rely upon certain language taken out of context in two opinions which declare that necessary parties are not limited to those who own property abutting immediately upon the portion of the street to be closed. Those cases- are Henderson v. City of Lexington, 132 Ky. 390, 111 S.W. 318, 22 L.R.A.,N.S., 20, and Riedling v. Harrod, 298 Ky. 232, 182 S.W.2d 770.

While both of those cases stated the proposition above set forth, they each went further to decide that the only necessary, parties are those who own abutting property *within the square or block*affected by *707the closing of a portion of a street. That is the clearly expressed provision of the statute, and our attention is called to no case which construes it otherwise.

Were we to assume that the allegations of the intervening petition stated facts sufficient to show that appellants suffered some injury as the result of this closing which was different and distinct from that experienced by the general public, see Alsip v. Hodge, 214 Ky. 438, 283 S.W. 392, since their property was not within the block partially closed, KRS 94.360 does not authorize their participation in this particular suit. Therefore the Chancellor properly denied them a right to intervene.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS PART OF THE
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,634
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,190
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,692
<PP&E>                                         171,094
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,144
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,002
<SALES>                                        119,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,142
<CGS>                                           30,104
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (80)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,513
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,951
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,562
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                       (1,233)
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,329
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57


</TABLE>
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

EUGENIO VARGAS, § 

§ 

 Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, § 

§ 

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00430-Y

§ 

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL § 

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, JULIE § 

HEDRICK, AND ERIK HARRIS, § 

§ 

 Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs. § 

UNION DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSETO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO 

RESPOND TO THE UNION DEFENDANTS’MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT 

The Union Defendants1 will not file a response in opposition to Plaintiff Vargas' s 

motion (doc. 47) for extension to respond to the Union Defendants motion for summary 

judgment (doc. 43), and will leave the grant of the extension, and the length thereof, to the 

Court's discretion. 

Date: October 6, 2022 Respectfully Submitted, 

/s/ Sanford R. Denison

SANFORD R. DENISON 

Tex. Bar No. 05655560 

Baab & Denison, LLP 

6301 Gaston Ave., Suite 550 

Dallas, TX 75214 

Tel.: (214) 637-0750 

Fax.: (214) 637-0730 

Email: denison@baabdenison.com 

1 “Union Defendants” shall refer collectively to Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Association of 

Professional Flight Attendants (“APFA”) and to individual APFA officer Defendants Julie 

Hedrick and Erik Harris. 

Case 4:22-cv-00430-Y Document 49 Filed 10/06/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2779
2 

WILLIAM W. OSBORNE JR.* 

D.C. Bar No. 912089 

Osborne Law Offices P.C. 

5335 Wisconsin Avenue N.W., Suite 440 

Washington, D.C. 20015 

Tel.: (202) 243-3200 

Fax: (202) 686-2977 

Email: b.osborne@osbornelaw.com 

Counsel for Defendant Counterclaim Plaintiff 

Association of Professional Flight Attendants, and 

Defendants Julie Hedrick and Erik Harris 

*Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that on this 6th day of October 2022 a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

document was served on the below listed counsel of record for Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant 

Vargas by a means permitted by Rule 5(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“F.R.C.P.”). 

KERRI PHILLIPS 

HEATHER ABREU 

K.D. Phillips Law Firm, PLLC 

5700 Tennyson Parkway, Suite 300 

Plano, Texas 75024 

Phone: (972) 327-5800 

Fax: (940) 400-0089 

Email: kerri@KDphillipslaw.com 

Email: Heather@KDphillipslaw.com 

/s/ Sanford R. Denison

SANFORD R. DENISON 

Case 4:22-cv-00430-Y Document 49 Filed 10/06/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2780
# Appendix A

&F - &A

# Appendix B

&F - &A

# Sheet1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                 APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                                           406,168
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     15,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                        2,548
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 496,395
<PP&E>                                                            97,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    59,293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   616,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            453,147
<BONDS>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                           9,087
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                       154,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     616,887
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     265
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 498,534
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 3,139
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (501,408)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       9,180
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (492,228)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (474,408)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (.07)







</TABLE>
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors andshareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the"Company"), a subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loanoutsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial taxservice provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2016 and forthe year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii),1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii)and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessaryin the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected servicingactivities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Companyperformed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activitiesperformed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Ourprocedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors thatmay have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affectedthe balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the periodcovered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonablebasis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determinationon the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which theCompany served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

 

February 6, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas TX 75201-2997*

*T: 214-746-6500, F:214-712-6660,*www.pwc.com
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference
is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special
Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,as
Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodianand WILMINGTON
TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS2 (the "Agreement").
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this
Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through
December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.



Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 
Wells Fargo Bank
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 135

JOINT RESOLUTION

1994 as ‘‘National Trauma Awareness Month’’.

To designate the months of May 1993 and May
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 135

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the months of May 1993 and May 1994 as

‘‘National Trauma Awareness Month’’.

Whereas more than 9,000,000 individuals in the United

States suffer traumatic injury each year;

Whereas traumatic injury is the leading cause of death for

individuals under 44 years of age in the United States;

Whereas every individual is a potential victim of traumatic

injury;
2

•HJ 135 EH

Whereas traumatic injury often occurs without warning;

Whereas traumatic injury frequently renders its victims incapable of caring for themselves;

Whereas past inattention to the causes and effects of trauma

has led to the inclusion of trauma among the most neglected medical conditions in the United States;

Whereas it is estimated that the people of the United States

will spend more than $175,000,000,000 this year on the

problem of trauma;

Whereas trauma is preventable and increased efforts to prevent trauma would reduce or eliminate deaths and disability due to trauma;

Whereas the problem of trauma can be remedied only by prevention and treatment through emergency medical services and trauma systems; and

Whereas the people of the United States must be educated

in the prevention and treatment of trauma and in the

proper and effective use of emergency medical systems:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That May 1993 and May 1994 are each designated as

4 ‘‘National Trauma Awareness Month’’ and the President

5 is authorized and directed to issue a proclamation calling
3

•HJ 135 EH

1 upon the people of the United States to observe these

2 months with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Passed the House of Representatives May 25, 1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 35.1

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

 

This Compliance Certificateis furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of April 22,2015, by and among Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2015-B, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”),Hyundai ABS Funding, LLC (formerly known as Hyundai ABS Funding Corporation), as depositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trusteeand Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

1)           I am a duly authorizedofficer of the Servicer.

 

2)          A review of theactivities of the Servicer from April 22, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Relevant Period”) and of the Servicer’sperformance under the Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.

 

3)          Based on suchreview, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Relevant Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed thisCompliance Certificate this 18th day of March, 2016.
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|U.S. Refinery Crude Oil Working Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|U.S. Refinery Crude Oil Working Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 181,165 | 188,382 | 183,261 | 177,695 | 178,824 | 176,747 | 176,404 | 174,361
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 174,490 | 171,366 | 167,736 | 170,823 | 164,364 | 163,111 | NA      | 158,435 | NA      | 160,624
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 159,815 | 157,986 | 157,582 | 161,892 | 155,874 | 161,946 | 157,357 | 157,756 | 151,872 | 151,945
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 153,181 | --      | --      | --      | --      | --      | --      | --      | --      | --     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --      | --      | --      | --      | --      |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025