alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Engineering Education and Centers (#173).                    

*Date and Time:*                         January 8-9, 2001 8:30 AM-5:30 PM.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Persons:*                         Ms. Mary Poats, Program Manager, Engineering Education and Centers Division, National Science Foundation, Room 585, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8380.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the Research Experiences for Undergraduates Program as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                     

Dated: November 6, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-28788  Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The data schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation's Balance Sheet at September 30,
1997, and from its Statement of Income for the nine months ended
September 30, 1997. The information presented is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          12,598
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  381,539
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,055
<INVENTORY>                                    186,571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               612,642
<PP&E>                                         320,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                 129,447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,261,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          365,482
<BONDS>                                        366,731
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           656
<OTHER-SE>                                     492,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,261,531
<SALES>                                      1,878,218
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,878,218
<CGS>                                        1,408,311
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,408,311
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               388,924
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,895
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 67,478
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,325
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,153
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    39,153
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

                                     BY THE
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of LION, Inc., a Washington
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of
Randall D. Miles, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve Thomson, Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350), that to his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


/s/ Randall D. Miles                        /s/ Steve Thomson
------------------------------------        ------------------------------------
Randall D. Miles                            Steve Thomson

AUGUST 15, 2005                             AUGUST 15, 2005
------------------------------------        ------------------------------------
<PAGE>

DATA SALES CO., INC.
3450 west burnsville parkway - burnsville, mn 55337
612-890-8838 - fax 612-890-8917

March 29, 2000

Mr. Mike Mehr
Adaytum Software Inc.
2051 Killebrew Drive
Suite 400
Bloomington, MN 55425

Dear Mike,

Data Sales Co. Inc. is pleased to provide Adaytum Software Inc. the following
lease.

<TABLE>
<S>                                 <C>
Equipment:                          Dell and NEC Hardware
Structure:                          Sale Lease Back
Cost:                               $375,000.00
FDC:                                April 1, 2000
Term:                               18 Months
Payment:                            $24,090.00 per month plus sales tax
End of Term:                        Fair market Value not to exceed 10% of cost provided no default
                                    has occurred, return or renewal
Warrants:                           5% of financed amount based on $5.86 per share
Terms and Conditions:               a.  Monthly payments made by ACH direct deposit
                                    b.  Data Sales Co. will purchase equipment from Adaytum
                                    Software Inc.
                                    c.  See Master Lease dated 6/8/98
</TABLE>

Please sign below acknowledging the conditions of this lease.

Thank you.

Sincerely,                               AGREED TO BY:

                                         Name:  /s/ Mike H. Mehr
                                              ----------------------------------
/s/ Daniel Gannon
                                         Printed Name:  Mike H. Mehr
                                                      --------------------------
Daniel Gannon
                                         Title:  VP - Finance & Administration
                                              ----------------------------------

                                         Date:  March 30, 2000
                                              ----------------------------------
#### Ex parte WADE.

No. 22849.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 15, 1944.

Mat Davis, of Gilmer, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding. The disposition made thereof in the trial court, *691as shown by the judgment entered, is as follows : “It is, therefore, Ordered and Adjudged that the application of the Petitioner, Jim Wade, herein be denied and issuance of writ as applied for refused; to which action and judgment of the Court the Petitioner then and there in open court excepted and gave notice of appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, at Austin, Texas.” Such order is nothing more nor less than a refusal to issue the writ of habeas corpus, and is not such a final judgment as will authorize an appeal to this court. Ex parte Noble, Tex.Cr.App., 176 S.W.2d 951.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT 99.4
                                                                    ------------

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

                                     BY THE

               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


     Each of David Stedman, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve Thomson, Chief
Financial Officer, of LION, Inc., a Washington corporation (the "Company"),
hereby certifies that:

(1)  The Company's periodic report on Form 10 - QSB for the period ended June
     30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Form 10 - QSB fairly presents, in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


/s/ David Stedman                          /s/ Steve Thomson
----------------------                     ------------------------
David Stedman                              Steve Thomson

August 14, 2002                            August 14, 2002
----------------------                     ------------------------
<PAGE> 1                                                EXHIBIT 11.

MUSTANG SOFTWARE, INC.

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(In thousands, except earnings per share) (Unaudited)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>

                                                        Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended
                                                           June 30,              June 30, 
                                                        1996       1997     1996       1997
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding     3,363      3,384    3,361      3,379 
Common stock equivlents from outstanding stock options       0          0        0          0
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average common and common stock equivalents outstanding  3,363      3,384    3,361      3,379
==============================================================================================
Net Income                                               $(649)    $ (357)  $ (1,300)   $(574)   
==============================================================================================
Earnings per share (1)                                   $(.19)    $ (.11)  $ (.39)     $(.17) 
===============================================================================
</TABLE>

(1) Fully diluted earnings per share have not been presented because the effects
are not material.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### McDOWELL v. STATE.

No. 21685.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 20, 1941.

*378W. D. Nicholson, of Jacksboro, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in dry area.

Acting under authority of a search warrant, officers found on appellant’s premises 96 cans of Grand Prize beer, 33 bottles of Falstaff beer and two pints of whisky. Appellant testified that the liquor in question had been bought by him for his own personal use, and that he had it for such purpose and not for the purpose of sale.

The State proved over appellant’s objection by one of the officers that some two months before the raid he had bought a pint of whisky from appellant at the same place searched. The witness admitted that he had filed a complaint against appellant based upon said alleged sale, and that upon a trial appellant had been acquitted.

 It has been the consistent holding of this court that upon a trial for possessing liquor for the purpose of sale the State may prove sales of such liquor, if not too remote, upon the issue of the purpose for which the liquor was possessed. See Atwood v. State, 96 Tex.Cr.R. 249, 2S7 S. W. 563; McLendon v. State, 101 Tex.Cr. R. 128, 274 S.W. 159; Griggs v. State, 99 Tex.Cr.R. 215, 268 S.W. 940; Deshazo v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 490, 262 S.W. 764. However, we are not aware of any case where evidence of a claimed prior sale has been admitted over a judgment of acquittal of the particular act charged. The harm here is apparent. The State made a case where it was entitled to and received the benefit of the prima facie presumption of the purpose of sale from the quantity of liquor in appellant’s possession. He undertook to combat the presumption- by his claim that he had it for personal use. The issue was sharp. The State then sought the benefit of a claimed sale of which appellant had been found not guilty. We think error was committed in admitting the evidence.

Other bills of exception as qualified do not present error.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LADARRAH W.

 Plaintiff,

V.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING 

COMMISSION OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 3:22-cv-951-K

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this 

case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge dated July 20, 2023 [Dkt. No. 22], the Court finds that the Findings 

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the 

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. 

The Court REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision and REMANDS this case 

to the Commissioner for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.

Signed August 9th, 2023.

 _____________________________________

 ED KINKEADE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00951-K-BT Document 23 Filed 08/10/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1909
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28922]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-3577-000]


New England Power Pool; Notice of Filing

November 6, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 2, 2000, the New England Power Pool 
(NEPOOL) Participants Committee submitted in the above-captioned docket 
supplemental information relating to its August 31, 2000 filing of the 
Sixty-Fourth Agreement Amending New England Power Pool Agreement (the 
Sixty-Fourth Agreement), which proposed the elimination of In Service. 
This supplemental information clarifies the purpose and intended effect 
on the Sixty-Fourth Agreement.
    The NEPOOL Participants Committee has requested an effective date 
of December 1, 2000.
    The NEPOOL Participants Committee states that copies of these 
materials were sent to all persons identified on the service list in 
the above-captioned docket, the NEPOOL Participants, the Non-
Participant Transmission Customers and the six New England state 
governors and regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's rules of practice 
and procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before November 14, 2000. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically 
via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28922 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MATTHEW PAUL MORRIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1100

[March 9, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Michael J. 

McNicholas, Judge; L.T. Case No. 472009CF000585A.

Matthew Paul Morris, Cross City, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Case 2:22-cv-00088-Z-BR Document 11 Filed 01/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 26
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP96-200-059]

Take notice that on November 1, 2000, Reliant Energy Gas Transmission Company (REGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective November 1, 2000:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 8I

Second Revised Sheet No. 8J

REGT states that the purpose of this filing is to reflect the addition of two new negotiated rate contracts.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with § 385.214 or § 385.211 of the Commission's rules and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with § 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-28924  Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. OP 20
- 0 410 MIGUEL GARDIPEE ,

Petitioner, v. JAMES SALMONSEN , Acting Warden,

Respondent. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Respondent ’s motion for a 3 0
- day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent is granted an extension of time to and including March 16 , 20 2 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file his response.

**DM** Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 9 2021

02/09/2021

Case Number: OP 20-0410
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0724

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MADISON WILLIAM MINER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 3, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 29 2024

07/29/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0724
#### ATCHLEY v. STATE.

No. 21651.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 18, 1941.

Tom. L. Robinson, of Gatesville, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for driving an automobile upon the public highway while intoxicated. The penalty assessed is confinement in the county jail for five days and a fine of $50.

*367No notice of appeal appears in the record. This is necessary to give this court jurisdiction of the appeal. See Art. 827, C.C.P., also Branch’s Ann.Tex.P.C., sec. 588, and cases cited under Art. 827, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.C.C.P., Vol. 3, p. 197.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.