alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

          - [A-570-832] 

# AGENCY:

Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Correction to Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order: Pure Magnesium from the People's Republic of China. 

# SUMMARY:

                        On October 27, 2000, the Department of Commerce (“the Department”), published in the                         **Federal Register**                         the continuation of the antidumping duty order on pure magnesium from the People's Republic of China.[1]                                                  Subsequent to the publication of the continuation of the antidumping duty order, we identified an error in the “Determination” section of the notice. Therefore, we are correcting this error.                     

The error lies in the last sentence of the last paragraph of the determination section: “Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) and 751(c)(6) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of this order not later than April 2005.” The sentence should be replaced with “Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) and 751(c)(6) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of this order not later than September 2005.” 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Martha V. Douthit, Office of Policy for Imports Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-5050.

Dated: November 3, 2000.

Richard W. Moreland,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

# Footnotes

1.                                 See Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order: Pure Magnesium From the People's Republic of China, 65 FR 64422 (October 27, 2000).                         
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-29006 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
(logo)TORCHLIGHT

          LOAN SERVICES

 

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

CERTIFICATION

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-C28,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through CertificatesSeries 2015-C28 (the “Trust”)

 

I, Jacob Baron, on behalf ofTorchlight Loan Services, LLC, as special servicer (the “Certifying Servicer”),certify to J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. and itsofficers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that theywill rely upon this certification, that:

 

I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities forthe fiscal year 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) and the Certifying Servicer’sperformance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

To the best of my knowledge,based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respectsduring the Reporting Period. 

 

 

Date:February 28, 2018

 

TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC, as Special Servicer

 

By: /s/ Jacob Baron 

Name: Jacob Baron

Title:  Authorized Signatory

 

 

475 Fifth Avenue, New York,NY 10017

T 212.883.2800  F 212.883.2560

Einfo@torchlightloanservices.com

www.torchlightinvestors.com
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JAN 27 2003

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM LORD PUNCHARD, King,

Royal Democratic State of Continental

Africa Government (Edmound Right,

Royal Consul; Michel Contreres,

Royal Consul),

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO; GARRY

JOHNSON, Governor; 2ND

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

NEW MEXICO; 12TH JUDICIAL

DISTRICT COURT OF NEW

MEXICO; NEW MEXICO STATE

CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT;

DEMING CITY MAGISTRATE

COURT,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 02-2275

D.C. No. CIV-02-780 BB/KBM

(D. New Mexico)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before KELLY, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. 
-2-

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

William Punchard, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal

of his action for lack of federal jurisdiction. In his filings before the district

court, Punchard alleged that he is the head-of-state of a non-existent country and

that two diplomats employed by his “country” are being illegally incarcerated in

New Mexico state prison; Punchard requested habeas relief on behalf of these two

individuals. Punchard further alleged that he was being harassed by the Deming,

New Mexico “City Magistrate Court,” which is allegedly mailing “Harassing

Court Summons” to his “Royal Embassy.” In dismissing this action, the district

court concluded that Punchard’s allegations were so fanciful and delusional that

they failed to invoke the court’s federal question jurisdiction.

This court has thoroughly reviewed all of the numerous documents filed by

Punchard in this appeal and has reviewed de novo the district court’s order of

dismissal and the entire record on appeal. That review demonstrates that the

district court’s resolution of the case was substantially correct. Accordingly, this 
-3-

court AFFIRMS for substantially those reasons set out in the district court’s

order of dismissal dated September 3, 2002. All pending motions are hereby

DENIED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 162 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 162

 Expressing the sense of the Congress that the President should report 
to Congress pursuant to section 4(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution as 
    it applies to the use of United States Armed Forces in Somalia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1993

   Mr. DeFazio (for himself, Mr. Andrews of Maine, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. 
     LaRocco, and Mr. Sanders) submitted the following concurrent 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress that the President should report 
to Congress pursuant to section 4(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution as 
    it applies to the use of United States Armed Forces in Somalia.

Whereas United States Armed Forces are clearly engaged in hostilities in 
        Somalia;
Whereas the President has not formally reported to Congress pursuant to section 
        4(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution;
Whereas the requirements of the War Powers Resolution clearly apply to the use 
        of United States Armed Forces in Somalia; and
Whereas Congress has not formally enacted authorization for the use of United 
        States Armed Forces in a hostile situation abroad: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the President should immediately submit to the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and to the President pro tempore of the Senate 
the report required by section 4(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution (50 
U.S.C. 1541, et seq.), setting forth the circumstances necessitating 
the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities in 
Somalia, the constitutional and legislative authority under which the 
introduction took place, and the estimated scope and duration of the 
involvement of such forces in Somalia.

                                 <all>
```
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

MARY KAY WEISS,

Plaintiff,

v.

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, 

LLC. AND CREDIT MANAGEMENT LP,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:22-cv-00331-P

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, MARY KAY WEISS, and Defendant,

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, hereby notify the Court the parties have reached 

settlement, and are in the process of completing the settlement agreement and filing dismissal 

papers. The parties anticipate filing dismissal papers within 60 days.

DATED: October 12, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

MARY KAY WEISS,

/s/ Marwan R. Daher 

Marwan R. Daher, Esq.

Sulaiman Law Group, Ltd. 

2500 South Highland Avenue 

Suite 200

Lombard, IL 60148 

Phone: (630) 575-8181

mdaher@sulaimanlaw.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 4:22-cv-00331-P Document 21 Filed 10/12/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 100
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I today caused a copy of the foregoing document to be electronically 

filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will be sent to all attorneys of 

record.

/s/ Marwan R. Daher

Case 4:22-cv-00331-P Document 21 Filed 10/12/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 101
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JORGE LUIS GOMEZ, III,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 346 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of February, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### CASTANO v. STATE.

No. 26043.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 19, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

'George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of an aggravated assault on a female, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or 'bills of exception. All matters of procedure appear to be in regular form.

The judgment is affirmed.
Case 3:22-cv-00842-S-BH Document 16 Filed 07/07/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 54
Case 3:22-cv-00842-S-BH Document 16 Filed 07/07/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 55
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0430

IN THE MATTER OF:

V.K.B.,

A Youth.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 14, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 10 2021

05/10/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0430
4-11-2022

3:22-MJ-361-BN

FILED

KAREN MITCHELL

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT April 11, 2022

Case 3:22-mj-00361-BN Document 1 Filed 04/11/22 Page 1 of 16 PageID 1
Case 3:22-mj-00361-BN Document 1 Filed 04/11/22 Page 2 of 16 PageID 2
Case 3:22-mj-00361-BN Document 1 Filed 04/11/22 Page 3 of 16 PageID 3
Case 3:22-mj-00361-BN Document 1 Filed 04/11/22 Page 4 of 16 PageID 4
Case 3:22-mj-00361-BN Document 1 Filed 04/11/22 Page 5 of 16 PageID 5
Case 3:22-mj-00361-BN Document 1 Filed 04/11/22 Page 6 of 16 PageID 6
Case 3:22-mj-00361-BN Document 1 Filed 04/11/22 Page 7 of 16 PageID 7
Case 3:22-mj-00361-BN Document 1 Filed 04/11/22 Page 8 of 16 PageID 8
Case 3:22-mj-00361-BN Document 1 Filed 04/11/22 Page 9 of 16 PageID 9
Case 3:22-mj-00361-BN Document 1 Filed 04/11/22 Page 10 of 16 PageID 10
Case 3:22-mj-00361-BN Document 1 Filed 04/11/22 Page 11 of 16 PageID 11
Case 3:22-mj-00361-BN Document 1 Filed 04/11/22 Page 12 of 16 PageID 12
Case 3:22-mj-00361-BN Document 1 Filed 04/11/22 Page 13 of 16 PageID 13
11

Case 3:22-mj-00361-BN Document 1 Filed 04/11/22 Page 14 of 16 PageID 14
Case 3:22-mj-00361-BN Document 1 Filed 04/11/22 Page 15 of 16 PageID 15
Case 3:22-mj-00361-BN Document 1 Filed 04/11/22 Page 16 of 16 PageID 16
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

 

I,Cory J. Reed, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2015 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.             I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association (as indenture trustee).

 

 

 
| Date: January 27,   2017 | By:    | */s/ Cory J. Reed*                            |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   | Cory J. Reed                                  |
|                          |   | President of John Deere   Capital Corporation |
|                          |   | (as Servicer)                                 |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2912]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets of commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: February 18, 2000.
    Time: 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Neuroscience Center, National Institutes of Health, 6001 
Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Gerald E. Calderone, PHD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Rm 
6150, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-443-1340.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 2, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-2912 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Dietary and Hormonal Determinants of Cancer in Women.                    

*Date:*                         February 9-11, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         7:30 p.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The Best Western Boston—The Inn at Longbeach Medic, 342 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Christopher L. Hatch, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8044, Bethesda, MD 20892 (301) 496-4964.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower, 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 3, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-2907  Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Order – Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

KESHA TERRY, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-633-L-BT

§

DETENETION WORKERS and §

SUPERVISOR/DALLAS SHERIFF, §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

On March 31, 2022, the United States Magistrate Judge entered the Findings, Conclusions 

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 7) (“Report”), recommending 

that the court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), dismiss with prejudice as frivolous this 

action by Plaintiff. As Plaintiff has filed two prior duplicative lawsuits that were dismissed with 

prejudice, the magistrate judge further recommends that she not be allowed to amend her pleadings 

because it appears she has pleaded her best case, and she is a vexatious litigant who has been 

previously warned and sanctioned for filing frivolous lawsuits. On April 19, 2022, Plaintiff, who 

is proceeding pro se and has requested to have counsel appointed (Doc. 9l), filed objections to the 

Report in which she continues to maintain that she has valid claims for injuries.

Having considered the pleadings, Report, file, and record in this case, and having 

conducted a de novo review of that portion of the report to which objection was made, the court 

determines that the magistrate judge’s findings and conclusions are correct, and accepts them as 

those of the court. Accordingly, the court overrules Plaintiff’s objections, and, pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), dismisses with prejudice as frivolous this action by Plaintiff. The court 

Case 3:22-cv-00633-L-BT Document 10 Filed 04/29/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 26
Order – Page 2

also, denies as moot Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel for purposes of prosecuting this 

action. Further, for the reasons explained by the magistrate judge, the court will not allow 

Plaintiff to amend her pleadings.

The court prospectively certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good 

faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). In support of this certification, the 

court accepts and incorporates by reference the Report. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 

and n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the Report, the court finds that any appeal of this action would 

present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. See Howard v. King, 

707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Plaintiff, however, may challenge this finding pursuant to

Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F. 3d 197 (5th Cir. 1997), by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma 

pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 

within 30 days of this order. 

It is so ordered this 29th day of April, 2022.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-00633-L-BT Document 10 Filed 04/29/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 27