alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[PUBLIS H] IN THE U

NITED STATE S COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 10 25 5

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 0 :0 6- cv -6 03 70 -MGC MIC HAEL GE ORGE BRUNO, SR., ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Pet it io ne r - App el lant , ve rs us SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Res po nd en t - Ap pe ll ee.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e So ut he rnDis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Oct ob er 3 0, 2 01 2) Befo re TJ OFLAT, MARTIN andEDMONDSON, Circu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: Mi ch ael Geor ge Bru no , Sr., a Flo rid a d eath ro w in m at e, ap pe al s fr om th e di st ric t co urt’s d en ia l o f hi s fi rs t fe de ral habe as co rp us pe ti ti on , bro ug htpu rs ua nt

Case: 11-10255 Date Filed: 10/30/2012 Page: 1 of 2to 28 U.S.C. § 2 25 4. Th is cas e is curren tl y un de r subm is si on aft er b rie fin g and or al arg um en t. On Oct ob er 2 4, 2 01 2, M r. Bru no ’s cou ns el fil eda m ot io n t o d is mis s ap pe al be cau se he was n ot ifi edonOcto be r 23 th atMr. Bru no di edof n atur al cau se s. Th e Fl or id a Dep art m en t o f Co rrec ti on s’ webs it e n ow al so in di cat es th atMr. Bruno is de ceas ed . See Offe nd er Se arch , Flo rid a Dep artm en t o f Co rrec ti on s, (l as t upd at ed Octo be r 23 , 20 12 ). The de ath o f th e h ab eas pe ti ti on er ren de rs a habe as act io n m oo t. See Dov e v. Un it edSta te s, 4 23 U.S. 32 5, 9 6 S . Ct. 5 79 (19 76 ). In l ig htof t hi s, we v acat e th e jud gm en t an d re m an d the cas e to th e d is tri ctco urt wi th di rect io ns to di sm is s the cas e as m oo t. See Knap p v . Bak er, 5 09 F.2d92 2, 9 22 –2 3 (5 th Cir . 19 75 ); see 1 al so Griff ey v. Lin ds ey , 34 9 F .3d11 57 , 11 57 (9t h C ir. 2 00 3) ; M cMi ll inv. Bo wers ox , 10 2 F .3d98 7 (8 th Cir . 19 96 ); Hi ll m anv. Mc Cau gh try, 14 F .3d35 0, 35 0 (7 thCir . 19 94 ); Hann v. Hawk , 20 5 F .2d83 9, 8 39 –4 0 (8 th Cir . 19 53 ). VACATED AND REMANDED WIT H I NSTRUCTI ONS.

In Bonne r v. City

of Prichard

, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 ( 11th Cir.1981) (en ba nc), w e 1 adopted a s binding pre cede nt all decisions of the for mer F ifth Circuit handed down be fore October 1, 1981. 2 Case: 11-10255 Date Filed: 10/30/2012 Page: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1








Certification Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The
following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 of Hub Group, Inc. pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Exchange Act of 1934 or any other
securities law.




Each of
the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Hub Group, Inc.








/s/ David P.Yeager
            /s/ Terri A.
PizzutoDavid P.
      Yeager
            Terri A.
      PizzutoChairman and
      Chief Executive Officer
            Executive Vice
      President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerHub
      Group, Inc.
            Hub
      Group, Inc.
#### ANDERSON et al. v. WHEELER et ux.

No. 5695.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

Dec. 18, 1940.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 2, 1941.

*211Dorbandt & Dorbandt, of Tyler, for appellants.

Israel Smith, of Tyler, for appellees.

HALL, Justice.

It appears that on June 22, 1939, the record on appeal in this case was properly lodged with the Court of Civil Appeals, and thereafter, on-July 18, 1940, the case w-as regularly set down for submission on November 7, 1940, and counsel for both parties were given due notice thereof. The appellants did not present their briefs for filing therein until October 18, 1940, which was after the time prescribed by law for filing briefs in the Courts of Civil Appeals. Appellees strenuously object to consideration of appellants’ brief for the reason that -such briefs were- not timely filed within the statutory period, and have filed a motion to strike the same and to dismiss the appeal.

In the case of Rowntree v. Peck Furniture Company, 248 S.W. 26, 29, our Supreme Court has very aptly said: “The courts, as well as litigants, are interested in the reasonable dispatch of business, in .such manner as not to sacrifice any substantial right of either party. Hence rules are provided that will enable the trial court and our appellate courts to so dispatch such business as comes before them, without unnecessary delay. The Courts of Civil Appeals have the right to enforce these rules within such limitation as justice may require.”

Since the appellants did not comply with the rule in respect to filing briefs within the time required by law, appellees’ motion will be granted and the appeal dismissed. Article 1848, R.S., Vernon’s Ann. Civ.St. art. 1848; Rule 36 for Courts of Civil Appeals; Rowntree v. Peck Furniture Co., Tex.Com.App., 248 S.W. 26; Gray v. Kaliski, Tex.Civ.App., 8 S.W.2d 203; Watson v. Emp. Liability Assur. Corp., Tex.Civ.App., 80 S.W.2d 1098; McHard v. Nona Mills Co., Tex.Civ.App., 35 S.W.2d 1108; Land v. Land, Tex.Civ.App., 83 S.W.2d 407; Gulf Production Co. v. Kishi, Tex.Civ.App., 105 S.W.2d 733; Pearlstone-Ash Co. v. Rembert Bank, Tex.Civ.App., 135 S.W.2d 559.
1

From: "Van Der Meyden, Henk" <Henk.VanDerMeyden@alcoa.com> 

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: "Palazzolo, Michael A." <Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com>, "Gregory, Dennis R." 

<Dennis.Gregory@alcoa.com> 

Date: 11/17/2011 10:15 AM 

Subject: Group 1 Furnace Startup and Shutdown Duration - Alumax of SC 

________________________________________

Rochelle,

In response to your telephone call of 11/16/2011 regarding the duration

of startup and shutdowns of Group 1 holding furnaces at Alumax of South

Carolina , I spoke with Cast House personnel. This is what I learned:

Startup - A furnace start-up is defined as the process of bringing the

furnace from ambient temperature to operating temperature. The start-up

begins when the furnace burner is ignited. The start-up concludes when

the furnace reaches its operating temperature.

The duration of a startup depends on whether there was work performed on

the furnace and the nature of that work. A startup duration can range

from as little as 36 hours (if there was no work done on the furnace) to

as much as 7 days (if there was replacement of refractory lining inside

the furnace). New refractory has to be slowly cured to avoid being

damaged. We uses 1300 degrees as the end point of a startup.

Shutdown - A furnace shutdown is defined as bringing the furnace

temperature from operating temperature to less than 200oF. The shutdown

begins when the burner is intentionally extinguished. The shutdown ends

when the furnace temperature falls below 200oF.

The duration of a shutdown is typically around 48 hours and somewhat

dependent on the ambient temperature.

Hope this answers your question. If not, please feel free to contact

me.

Sincerely,

Henk

Henk van der Meyden, PG

Environmental Manager

Alcoa - Mt. Holly

Office: (843) 572-5361

Cell: (843) 296-3359

Fax: (843) 572-5378
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coinstar, Inc. (the“***Company***”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Form 10-Q***”), I, Brian V. Turner, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

Dated: November 8, 2007
Joint Stipulation of Dismissal

H610-2164 / BDF 9193053 Wright

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MAE DOROTHY WRIGHT, §

§

 Plaintiff, §

§

v. §

§

Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-899-M-BN

RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT 

SERVICES, LLC and REO TRUST 

2017-RPL1,

§

§

§

§

 Defendants. §

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

On this the 5th day of January 2023, Plaintiff Mae Dorothy Wright (“Plaintiff”) and 

Defendant Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC and REO Trust 2017-RPL1 (collectively 

“Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby 

stipulate that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), all claims and causes of 

action asserted by Plaintiff and Defendants in this cause are dismissed with prejudice. 

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Shelley L. Hopkins

Shelley L. Hopkins

State Bar No. 24036497

HOPKINS LAW, PLLC

3 Lakeway Centre Ct., Suite 110

Austin, Texas 78734

(512) 600-4320

BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER

TURNER & ENGEL, LLP - Of Counsel

ShelleyH@bdfgroup.com

shelley@hopkinslawtexas.com

Robert D. Forster, II

State Bar No. 24048470

BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER

TURNER & ENGEL, LLP

Case 3:22-cv-00899-M-BN Document 9 Filed 01/05/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 114
Joint Stipulation of Dismissal

H610-2164 / BDF 9193053 Wright

Page 2 of 2

4004 Belt Line Road, Ste. 100

Addison, Texas 75001

(972) 386-5040

RobertFO@bdfgroup.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS

By: /s/ D. Kimberli Wallace

D. Kimberli Wallace

State Bar No. 00792901

D. Kimberli Wallace, PLLC

1560 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100

Southlake, Texas 76092

Tel: (817) 745-4581

Fax: (817) 953-7000

kwallace@kwlawfirm.net

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 5th day of January 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF filing system, and will send a true and correct 

copy to the following:

VIA ECF:

D. Kimberli Wallace

D. Kimberli Wallace, PLLC

1560 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100

Southlake, Texas 76092

kwallace@kwlawfirm.net

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

/s/ Shelley L. Hopkins

Shelley L. Hopkins

Case 3:22-cv-00899-M-BN Document 9 Filed 01/05/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 115
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 57 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 57

 To recognize the heroic sacrifice of the Special Agents of the Bureau 
            of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms in Waco, Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1993

 Mr. Hoyer (for himself, Mr. Rostenkowski, Mr. Pickle, Mr. Edwards of 
 Texas, Mr. Visclosky Mr. Darden, Mr. Olver, Mr. Bevill, Mr. Sabo, Mr. 
Andrews of Texas, Mr. Archer, Mr. Lightfoot, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Istook, and 
Mr. Houghton) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
 referred jointly to the Committees on Ways and Means and the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 To recognize the heroic sacrifice of the Special Agents of the Bureau 
            of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms in Waco, Texas.

Whereas Special Agents Steve Willis, Robert J. Williams, Conway LeBleu, and Todd 
        McKeehan, of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, were killed by 
        hostile gunfire in the performance of an heroic effort to disarm a 
        hostile cult and to protect the lives of innocent persons, including 
        children, living in its compound;
Whereas these men, along with 15 other special agents who were wounded during 
        this confrontation, were members of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and 
        Firearms elite Special Response Teams, whose members are highly trained 
        and experienced in the execution of high-risk operations;
Whereas such Special Response Teams have been deployed over 230 times in the 
        past year with no injury to any agent, including during a highly-
        publicized siege involving a fugitive white supremacist and during the 
        Los Angeles civil disturbances in 1992;
Whereas 182 special agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms have 
        been killed in the line of duty since Prohibition; and
Whereas the men and women of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms mourn 
        the loss of their brother officers, but maintain discipline and a 
        commitment to the protection of our citizens at the risk of their own 
        lives on a daily basis: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the sacrifice and dedication of the agents of the Bureau of 
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms is a cornerstone of our system of justice 
and cause for both sorrow and pride.

                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission.

# ACTION:

 Notice of Request for Comments.

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission is notifying interested parties that its draft strategic plan for the fiscal years 2000-2005, is available for public comment. The draft plan, prepared in accordance with the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (“GPRA”), defines the Commission's goals, specific objectives, time frames and methods for achieving goals at both the trial and appellate level. 

In developing its goals and objectives under GPRA, the Commission solicits the views of those who practice before it and those who are affected by its case dispositions. 

# DATES:

Comments should be received by December 18, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

Comments should be sent to Richard L. Baker, Executive Director, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, 1730 K Street, N.W., Suite 6000, Washington, D.C. 20006, fax: (202) 653-5030; E-mail: Info@FMSHRC.gov., phone: (202) 653-5625, or (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay. 

The draft plan is posted on the Commission's website, http://www.fmshrc.gov/​ under “What's New.” Printed copies can also be obtained from the above listed address.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

GPRA charges federal agencies with formulating strategic plans, preparing annual plans setting performance goals, and reporting annually the actual agency performance compared to those goals. In considering how best to formulate its goals and objectives, the Commission has sought to develop measures that allow it to better evaluate its performance and ultimately accomplish is statutory mission under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. 

The Commission requests that responses to this solicitation for comments be submitted by December 18, 2000.

Dated: October 31, 2000.

Mary Lu Jordan,

Chairman.

[FR Doc. 00-29289  Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund Limited Partnership (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-
Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
?Report?), I, Kevin Perry, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter
Management Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title	:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		November 14, 2005
#### TEXAS LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD v. CHRISMAN.

No. 12514.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Feb. 4, 1953.

Price Daniel, Atty. Gen., Clyde B. Ken-nelly, Calvin B. Garwood and John Davenport, Assts. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Neal Dancer, Corpus Christi, for appel-lee.

W. O. MURRAY, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by the Texas Liquor Control Board from a judgment of the District Court of Nueces County, Texas, setting aside and holding for naught an order by appellant cancelling “Beer Retail License No. 115158,” issued to Alice D. R. Chrisman, appellee herein.

We have not been 'favored with a brief for appellee and therefore accept the statements contained in appellant’s brief as correct.

The only question to be here considered is whether there was substantial evidence to reasonably support the action of appellant in cancelling appellee’s “Beer Retail License.” Jones v. Marsh, 148 Tex. 362, 224 S.W.2d 198, affirming Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion, 223 S.W.2d 29.

The testimony of two policemen of the City of Corpus Christi stated that appellee was drunk at her place of business on April 1, 1952, and that she was sitting in a booth with three other persons and all were drunk. This evidence was substantial evidence supporting the action of appellant in cancelling appellee’s “Beer Retail License.” Todd Shipbuilding Corp. v. Texas Employment Commission, Tex.Civ. App., 245 S.W.2d 371; Corder v. Delgado, Tex.Civ.App., 234 S.W.2d 268.

The judgment is reversed and judgment here rendered upholding the order of the Texas Liquor Control Board cancelling ap-pellee’s “Beer Retail License, No. 115158.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000940800
<NAME> FOOD COURT ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         673,274
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               704,565
<PP&E>                                       1,956,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                 280,978
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,767,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          916,092
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,643
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,600,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,767,260
<SALES>                                         28,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,750
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,725,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (17,661)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,679,516)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,679,516)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,679,516)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)
        

</TABLE>
# QSBL 123113

# SBLF Summary Business Lending

# QSBL 093013

# QSBL 063013

# QSBL 033113

# QSBL 123112

# QSBL 093012

# QSBL 063012

# QSBL 033112

# QSBL 123111

# QSBL 093011

# QSBL 063011

# QSBL 033111

# image1.png
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 67654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-2361; MM Docket No. 00-66; RM-9842]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Des Moines, NM

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Willison H. Gormly d/b/a/ 
Sierra Grande Broadcasting, allots Channel 287C to Des Moines, NM, as 
the community's first local aural service. See 65 FR 25697. May 3, 
2000. Channel 287C can be allotted to Des Moines in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements without the 
imposition of a site restriction, at coordinates 36-45-48 NL; 103-50-12 
WL. A filing window for Channel 287C at Des Moines will not be opened 
at this time. Instead, the issue of opening a filing window for this 
channel will be addressed by the Commission in a subsequent order.

DATES: Effective December 11, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-66, adopted October 11, 2000, and 
released October 20, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

47 CFR PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334. 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under New Mexico, 
is amended by adding Des Moines, Channel 287C.

    Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-28880 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P