alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 1115 SNPRM **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010 - SW - 011 - AD Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### NO COMMENTS RECEIVED

– If this box is checked, no s ignatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the fol lowing changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because

### Page 2 of 3

**For additional issues, double -**  **click here** 

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:
**ASE Date** 

**Branch Manager Date**
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|No chart available.                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                                    
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Georgia Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
PAGE 1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

JASON ERNEST NEAL 

 

Defendant 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

NO. 3:22-CR-171-K 

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 The Court referred the request for revocation of Defendant’s Supervised Release 

to United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford for consideration. The Court 

has received the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to its order. Defendant having waived allocution before this Court as well as 

his right to object to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate 

Judge are correct. 

 It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report is ADOPTED as 

the opinion and findings of the Court. It is further ORDERED that the Defendant be 

continued on terms of supervised release. However, the Special Conditions of 

Defendant’s supervised release are modified to provide as follows: 

You must participate in a substance abuse treatment program and follow 

the rules and regulations of that program. The probation officer will 

supervise your participation in the program (provider, location, modality, 

duration, intensity, etc.). You will be responsible for the cost of the 

program based on your financial ability to pay. 

Case 3:22-cr-00171-K Document 20 Filed 10/20/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 95
PAGE 2 

You must submit to substance abuse testing to determine if you have used 

a prohibited substance. You will be responsible for the costs of the testing 

based on your financial ability to pay. You must not attempt to obstruct 

or tamper with the testing methods. 

 SO ORDERED. 

 Signed October 20th, 2022. 

 _______________________________________ 

 ED KINKEADE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cr-00171-K Document 20 Filed 10/20/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 96
# Dividends, Interest, Repayments

# image1.png
|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History: Annual                                     
|View History: Annual                                     
|View History:                                            
|                                                         
|U.S. Distillate Consumed at Refineries (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                         
|                                                         
|U.S. Distillate Consumed at Refineries (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,713  | 966    | 783    | 429   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 397    | 445    | 533    | 515    | 499    | 1,005  | 733    | 721    | 761    | 572   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 724    | 1,068  | 840    | 951    | 816    | 755    | 434    | 420    | 472    | 339   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 440    | 483    | 539    | 475    | 309    | 364    | 402    | 394    | 439    | 374   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 279    | 243    | 257    | 273    |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Midwest (PADD 2) Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Midwest (PADD 2) Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 63     | 53     | 52     | 46     | 44     | 43     | 41     | 39    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 39     | 40     | 39     | 38     | 35     | 34     | NA     | 29     | NA     | 29    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 28     | 28     | 27     | 26     | 26     | 26     | 26     | 26     | 27     | 27    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 27     | 27     | 27     | 27     | 27     | 27     | 27     | 27     | 27     | 27    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 26     | 25     | 25     | 25     | 25     |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 221 Introduced in House (IH)]

                           [DISCUSSION DRAFT]

                           February 23, 1994

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. ))(

 Declaring the sense of Congress with respect to studies and research 
                  involving the legalization of drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 1994

 Mr. Solomon submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                     referred to the Committee on 
        <r-because><pound>v<box><natural><Rx><acctof><box><Rx>t 
           <bell><sharp><box><natural>at<careof><pound><Rx>s

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Declaring the sense of Congress with respect to studies and research 
                  involving the legalization of drugs.

Whereas the sale, possession and use of drugs pose a pervasive and substantial 
        threat to the social, educational, and economic health of the United 
        States;
Whereas the impact of drug abuse is reflected in the violence that it causes and 
        in the disintegration of families, schools, and neighborhoods;
Whereas the effects of rampant drug use is amply illustrated by national violent 
        crime statistics across the United States;
Whereas the overwhelming majority of health care and law enforcement experts 
        agree that drug legalization would have disastrous consequences for the 
        people of the United States; and
Whereas recent studies demonstrate that drug use by young people is on the rise 
        in the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
that it is the sense of Congress that no department or agency of the 
United States Government should conduct or finance, in whole or in 
part, any study or research involving the legalization of drugs.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         325,927
<SECURITIES>                                    22,069
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,328
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,807
<INVENTORY>                                      4,210
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               419,534
<PP&E>                                       1,483,235
<DEPRECIATION>                                 160,470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,934,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          154,629
<BONDS>                                      1,146,132
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           344
<OTHER-SE>                                     300,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,934,569
<SALES>                                        137,839
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,839
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,393
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,147
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,246
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (6,593)
<CHANGES>                                      (1,416)
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,237
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.3
                                                                    ------------

                                AMENDMENT NO. 1

                                     TO THE

                             CHART INDUSTRIES, INC.

                  1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS


     This Amendment No. 1 (this "Amendment") to the 1996 Stock Option Plan for
Outside Directors is made this 4th day of May, 2000 by the Board of Directors of
Chart Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), the terms of which are effective as of
the date hereof.

                              W I T N E S S E T H
                              - - - - - - - - - -

     WHEREAS, the Company's Board of Directors adopted the Chart Industries,
Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors (the "Plan") on February 8,
1996; and

     WHEREAS, the Plan was approved at a meeting of the Company's stockholders
on May 2, 1996; and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to increase the number of
shares of the Company's common stock ("Common Stock") available for future
grants under the Plan by 210,000; and

     WHEREAS, the Company's stockholders have approved this Amendment.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Plan is amended as
follows:

     Shares of Common Stock Subject to the Plan.  The second paragraph of
     ------------------------------------------
Section 3 of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and the following paragraph is
substituted in lieu thereof:

          "Subject to the provisions of the next succeeding paragraph of
     this Section 3, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock for
     which options may be granted under the Plan shall be Three Hundred
     Seventy-Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty (378,750) shares of
     Common Stock."
#### FLAKE v. STATE.

No. 26479.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 10, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

William H. Scott, Crim. Dist. Atty. and King G. Haynie, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., Houston, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is indecent exposure, as defined by Article 535c, Vernon’s Ann.P.C.; the punishment, five years.

•A young high school girl' testified that on the way home from school she observed the ' appellant sitting on the sidewalk and leaning up against a -building; that her companion called' the ■ appeliant to her attention, and as she looked at him he first returned her glance and then looked down at the region of'his private parts; that'his pants were unbuttoned, and appellant was holding -his penis in his hand. The witness testified that she became frightened and ran a block to a police car; that she got iri the police car and went with the officer, who apprehended the appellant a short distance from where he had exposed himself to her.

Officer Jenkins ■ testified that when he arrested- appellant he found - appellant’s pants unbuttoned. ■

Appellant’s confession was introduced in evidence, in which he stated that' he had purposely gone to the vicinity in which he was arrested, because he knew that there was a school nearby and that young girls would be passing by at the close of school. He further confessed that he got sexually excited when he looked at young girls and that he had unbuttoned his pants and played with his penis and showed it to the girls.

Appellant, testifying in his own behalf, denied the truth of his ■' confession and told the jury that he had sat down on the sidewalk in order to relieve his bladder and had done so. Appellant claimed that he had been physically mistreated by the officer who took his confession. ■

■Officer Jenkins testified, in rebuttal, that he had examined the spot on the sidewalk where appellant was reported to have been sitting and found no sign of any water.

Officer Noe testified fully, on rebuttal, as to the voluntary nature of the confession, and there are no exceptions to the court’s charge submitting' the question to the jury. ,.

We find the evidence ' sufficient to authorize the introduction of the confession and to ¡support the conviction.

• No error appearing, the judgment ■ of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 34.1



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that
Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (Midland or the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB
for all transactions serviced on the Enterprise!Loan Management System (the Platform), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),
1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the
Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



LOGO

February 25, 2016



LOGO

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106

T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890 www.pwc.com/us