alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"agency":"Treasury","generated":"2015-08-25 09:52:59","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"}],"value":"2015"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["BEP","DO","FinCEN","Fiscal Service","IRS","MINT","OCC","TIGTA","TTB"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["14","176","77","90","2370","24","377","100","21"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["30","119","92","89","2541","27","421","80","30"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["3","390"," ","4","427"," ","8","3"," "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2015","quarter":"Q3"}
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 115

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the House from the legislative day of Thursday, July 1, 1993 to Tuesday, July

13, 1993 and an adjournment or recess of the Senate

from Thursday, July 1, 1993 or Friday, July 2, 1993

until Tuesday, July 13, 1993.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Thursday, July 1, 1993, it stand adjourned

4 until noon on Tuesday, July 13, 1993, or until noon on

5 the second day after Members are notified to reassemble

6 pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, which7 ever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or

8 adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, July 1,

9 1993 or Friday, July 2, 1993, pursuant to a motion made

10 by the Majority Leader, or his designee, in accordance
2

HCON 115 ATS

1 with this resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until

2 noon, or until such time as may be specified by the Major3 ity Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or ad4 journ, on Tuesday, July 13, 1993, or until noon on the

5 second day after Members are notified to reassemble pur6 suant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever

7 occurs first.

8 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

9 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

10 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead11 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

12 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

13 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives July 1, 1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF IMPRINT RECORDS, INC. FORMERLY, VERITAS MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1996 AND FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
OCTOBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,297
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       85
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        334
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,803
<PP&E>                                             476
<DEPRECIATION>                                      75
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              184
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,302
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,242)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,244
<SALES>                                             94
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    94
<CGS>                                               13
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       13
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,198)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,198)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.25)
        

</TABLE>
1 

EXHIBIT 2 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FT. WORTH DIVISION

ROBERT (BOB) ROSS 

Plaintiff, Counterclaim-Defendant

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ Case No. 4:22-CV-00343

V.

§

§ 

§

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL 

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, MCGAUGHEY, 

REBER AND ASSOCIATES, INC., JULIE 

HEDRICK, ERIK HARRIS, IMA 

FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., LARRY 

SALAS, JOSH BLACK,

Defendants, Counterclaim Plaintiffs.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

SECOND AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.7.1 and LR 3.1(c), L.R 3.2(e), LR 7.4, LR 81.1(a)(4)(D) and 

LR 81.2, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Robert “Bob” Ross provides the following information:

For a nongovernmental corporate party, the name(s) of its parent corporation and any 

publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its stock (if none, state “None”):

 None. 

A complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporation, 

guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporation or other legal entities that 

are financially interested in the outcome of this case:

1. Association of Professional Flight Attendant (“APFA”);

2. Julie Hedrick, National President of APFA (“Hedrick”); 

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 88-8 Filed 04/14/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID 2040
2 

EXHIBIT 2 

3. Erik Harris, National Treasurer of APFA (“Harris”); 

4. Larry Salas, National Vice-President of APFA (“Salas”); 

5. Josh Black, National Secretary of APFA (“Black”); 

6. McGaughey Reber and Associates, Inc d/b/a Diversified Credit Systems;

7. Members of, and individuals represented by the APFA; 

8. IMA Finance Group, Inc.; and

9. Robert “Bob” Ross, former National President of APFA (“Plaintiff 

Counterclaim Defendant”). 

Date: April 14, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

K.D. PHILLIPS LAW FIRM, PLLC

By: /s/ Kerri Phillips

Kerri Phillips

Texas Bar No. 24065906 

Phone: (972) 327-5800 

Email: kerri@KDphillipslaw.com

6010 W. Spring Creek Parkway

Plano, Texas 75024 

Fax: (940) 400-0089

For Service of Filings: 

notice@KDphillipslaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 88-8 Filed 04/14/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID 2041
3 

EXHIBIT 2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on this 14th day of April, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document 

was served on the below listed counsels of record for Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiffs by 

means permitted by Rule 5(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“F.R.C.P.”).

William Osborne

Sanford Denison 

Michael Rake

/s/ Kerri Phillips 

Kerri Phillips

 

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 88-8 Filed 04/14/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID 2042
#### BRAZOS RIVER CONSERVATION & RECLAMATION DIST. v. ALLEN et al.

No. 8068.

Supreme Court of Texas.

May 26, 1943.

Samuels, Foster, Brown & McGee, of Fort Worth, and T. T. Bouldin, of Mineral Wells, for appellant.

J. R. Creighton and Ritchie *&*Ritchie, all of Mineral Wells, for appellee.

SMEDLEY, Commissioner.

This case arises from a proceeding instituted by Brazos River Conservation and Reclamation District for the condemnation of land owned by respondents Allen and Ritchie in Palo Pinto County, and particularly from Cause No. 2526 pending in the County Court of Palo Pinto County, being the first suit for condemnation filed by the District and discussed in the opinion in Cause Np. 8069, 171 S.W.2d 842, this day decided by this court. This is a suit for injunction filed by the District in the District Court of Palo Pinto County to restrain the land owners, Allen and Ritchie, from demanding or receiving, and the Clerk of the County Court and the County Depository from paying to Allen and Ritchie the $21,580 deposited by the District in the County Court, under the provisions of Article 3268 of the Revised Civil Statutes of 1925, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 3268 in order that it might take possession of the property sought to be condemned.

The trial court granted the temporary injunction sought by the District, but thereafter dissolved it on motion filed by respondents. On appeal the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the order dissolving > the temporary injunction. 166 S.W.2d 388.

This cause and Cause No. 8069 were submitted together in this court, and during the course of oral argument counsel *848for respondents stated that, in the event of the affirmance by this court in Cause 8069 of the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, they were willing that the $21,580 remain on deposit until final judgment in Cause No. 2526 in the County Court. Counsel for the District also agreed in open court that the deposit remain in the custody of the clerk of the County Court and the. County Depository.

In view of the foregoing agreement made in open court and the judgment rendered in Cause No. 8069, it is unnecessary to determine the questions presented by the application for writ of error. We express no opinion as to the rulings made herein by the Court of Civil Appeals.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and the order of the District Court dissolving the temporary injunction are set aside, and the order of the District Court made on March 3, 1941, granting a temporary injunction is hereby restored and reinstated as if it had not been dissolved, the injunction to remain in effect until final judgment in Cause No. 2526 now pending in the County Court of Palo Pinto County.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

ORDER STRIKING AND UNFILING DOCUMENT(S) 

The Court has independently determined that the document(s) below should be stricken and unfiled. Accordingly, it is ordered 

that the document(s) is/are stricken from the record of this case, and.thé Clerk is Mifected to note on the docket that the 

document(s) has/have been unfiled. a v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February 27. 2024 rr Ate 

DATE US. DISTRIG ve GISTRATE JUDGE ¥: : 

NOTICE OF BEEXCIENCY ~ 

Judge: Jeffrey L. Cureton Date: 02/27/2024 

Case Number: 

 

 4:22-cv-343 Style:  Ross v. Association of Professional Flight Attendents 

 

A(n) Response to Plaintiffs’ Sealed Motion for Sanctions and Appendix in support [docs. 210-11] has been filed by 

Defendants and is considered deficient in the area(s) noted below: 

1. A civil cover sheet must be filed with the complaint. See LR 3.1(a) or LR 3.2(c). 

2, The document(s) must be in proper form. See LR 10.1 or LCrR 49.3. 

3. The signature of the attorney of record, which includes a party proceeding pro se, is required on each 

document filed. See FED. R. Civ. P. L1(a), FED. R. Crim. P. 49(d), LR 11.1(b), or LCrR 49,5(b). 

4. A completed certificate of service is required. See FED. R. Civ. P. 5(d) or FED. R. Crim. P. 49(d). 

5. Each separate document contained therein must be identified. See LR 5.1(c) or LCrR 49.2(c). 

6. The motion or response must include: 

certificate of conference or inability to confer. See LR 7.1(b) or LCrR 47.i(b). 

brief in support of motion. See LR 7.1(d), LR 56.5(a), or LCrR 47.1(d). 

c. proposed order. See LR 7.1(c) or LCrR 47.1(c). os F 

d. documentary or non-documentary evidence in a separate appendix. See LR 7.1(i) or LR 56.6. 

7. A motion for leave to amend must have a copy of the proposed amended pleading attached as an exhibit. 

See LR 15.1(a) and (b). [f the motion for leave to amend is filed on paper, the motion must be 

accompanied by an original and second copy of the proposed amended pleading that is neither attached to the 

motion nor made an exhibit to the motion. See LR 15.1(a). 

8. A motion for continuance of a trial setting must be signed by the party as well as by the attorney of record. 

See LR 40.1. 

9. An attorney seeking pro hac vice admission must apply for admission on an approved form and pay the 

applicable fee. See LR 83.9(b) or LCrR 57.9(b). 

10. Additional copies are required. See LR 5.1(b) or LCrR 49.2(b). 

UH. The attorney filing the pleading is not admitted to practice in this district. See LR 83.7 or LCrR 57.7. 

12. The document requires a separately signed certificate of interested persons. See LR 3.1(c), LR 3.2(e), 

LR 7.4, LR 81.1 (a)(3)(D), or LR 81.2. 

v 13. Other: 

The motion underlying the response was struck and unfiled. Accordingly, there is no motion to respond to and 

the response was impropper.

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 215 Filed 02/27/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 4980
EXHIBIT 12.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
             Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                    ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Annual Report of Circle Group Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Dana
L. Dabney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ DANA L. DABNEY
-------------------------------
Dana L. Dabney
Chief Financial Officer

April 10, 2003
EXHIBIT 33.1





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA


FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES





Entergy New Orleans, Inc. (the “Servicer”), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:





(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Storm Recovery Bonds: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), 2(iii) (advances or guarantees), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), 4(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(x) (funds held in trust for an obligor), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);





(2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;





(3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2015,  and for the period July 22, 2015 through December 31, 2015, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and





(4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2015, and for the period July 22, 2015 through December 31, 2015, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.








Dated: March 29, 2016





Entergy New Orleans, Inc., as servicer





By: /s/ Alyson M. Mount





Name:  Alyson M. Mount


Title:   Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
### Fw: Responses to OMB set 1 and set 2 comments on draft NOxSOx proposal notice Jan King to: Sherry Russell 07/12/2011 12:09 PM I guess these go in group #3 since they are comments from OMB? Re-read the descriptions to see what you think. Jan King Regulatory Development and Policy Analysis Group phone: (919) 541-5665 fax: (919) 541-2664 Mailcode: C404-05
----- Forwarded by Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/12/2011 12:08 PM -----

From: "Laity, Jim" <James

_ A.

_ Laity@omb.eop.gov> To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic

_J.

_ Mancini@omb.eop.gov> Cc: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, John Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Rich Scheffe/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Janet McCabe/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Ginger Tennant/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Randy Waite/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 07/12/2011 12:07 PM Subject: RE: Responses to OMB set 1 and set 2 comments on draft NOxSOx proposal notice

Remaining comments are on p 1 in set 1, and on pp 29 and 100 in set 2 (two comments on each page). These are purely clarifying but I think they are important. Call if you want to discuss. If the suggested edits are acceptable, go ahead and upload clean version into ROCIS. jim -----Original Message----- From: Lydia Wegman [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 10:48 AM To: Laity, Jim; Mancini, Dominic J. Cc: Karen Martin; John Hannon; Jan King; Rich Scheffe; Janet McCabe; Ginger Tennant; Randy Waite Subject: Fw: Responses to OMB set 1 and set 2 comments on draft NOxSOx proposal notice
Jim, Here are our responses to your comments from yesterday. Please give me a call if you have any questions.

(See attached file: NOxSOx 7-11-11 set 2 w final comments_responses rs_7_12_11.docx) (See attached file: NOxSOx 7-11-11 set 1 w final comments_responses gmt.docx)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 23 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 23

Authorizing the Architect of the Capitol to transfer the catafalque to 
                the Supreme Court for a funeral service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 1993

  Mr. Lewis of Georgia submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
                   which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the Architect of the Capitol to transfer the catafalque to 
                the Supreme Court for a funeral service.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Architect of the Capitol is authorized and directed to 
transfer to the custody of the Chief Justice of the United States the 
catafalque which is presently situated in the crypt beneath the rotunda 
of the Capitol so that the said catafalque may be used in the Supreme 
Court Building in connection with services to be conducted there for 
the late Honorable Thurgood Marshall, former Associate Justice of the 
Supreme Court of the United States.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28704]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 12:00 noon, Monday, November 13, 2000.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: November 3, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-28704 Filed 11-3-00; 4:17 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P