alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) C-III | C-III Asset Management

 

 

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

C-III Asset Management LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Kevin Donahue, President of C-III Asset Management LLC *(f/k/a Centerline Servicing LLC)*, the Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2015, relating to the **CSAIL 2015-C1 Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C1** (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), hereby certifies as follows:

 

1. a review of the activities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the calendar year 2015 (the "Reporting Period ") has been made under the undersigned’s supervision;

 

2. to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer maintained an effective internal control system relating to its servicing of the Mortgage Loans serviced by it and has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2016, I have hereunto signed my name.

 

 

/s/ Kevin Donahue

**Kevin Donahue**, President

C-III Asset Management LLC, a

Delaware limited liability company

 

 

CSAIL 2015-C1
1 ... S ee T EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 4.

2 ... See Went w

orth v. M

eyer, 8 3 9 S .W. 2 d 7 6 6 , 7 6 7 ( Te x . 199 2) (ori g. p r o c e e d i ng); In re J

acks on , 1 4S .W. 3 d 8 4 3 , 8 4 6 (T ex. A pp.— Wa co 2 0 0 0 , ori g. proc ee di ng); Cit y of La P orte v. S t

ate ex rel. Rose , 3 7 6 S .W. 2 d 8 9 4 , 9 0 6 -0 7 (T ex. C i v. A pp.— Au st i n 1 9 6 4 ), rev ’d i n p a r t o n ot

her groun ds , 3 8 6 S .W. 2 d 7 8 2 (T ex. 1 9 6 5 ); see al

so In re Sanchez , 8 1 S .W. 3 d 7 9 4 , 7 9 6 (T ex. 2 0 0 2 ) (or i g. pr oce edi ng). 

## COURT OF APPEALS SEC OND DI STRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 15 4- CV I N R E M I CH AE L S UT T ON R E L AT OR

----- ----- -- OR I GI NAL P R OCE E DI NG

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON 1

----- ----- -- T h e c o u r t h a s c o n s id e r e d r e la t o r ’s p e t it io n f o r w r it o f m a n d a m u s a n d is of t he opi ni on t hat r el i ef s houl d be de ni ed. A cc or di ngl y, r el at or ’ s pet i t i on f or 2

w r i t of m and am us i s den i ed. R el at or shal l pay al l cost s of t hi s or i gi nal pr oceedi ng, f or w h ic h l et execut i on i ssue. P E R CU R I AM P A N E L A : L IV IN G S T O N , J .; C A Y C E , C .J .; a n d H O L M A N , J . DEL I VERE D: Apr i l 24, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. CP00-447-000]

On November 14, 2000, staff from the Office of Energy Projects (OEP) will conduct a pre-certification site visit of the proposed High Pressure Expansion Project at Distrigas of Massachusetts LLC's (DOMAC) existing liquefied natural gas storage facility in Everett, Massachusetts. Representatives of DOMAC will accompany the OEP staff.

All interested parties may attend the site visit. Those planning to attend must provide their own transportation. For further information on attending the site visit, please contact the Commission's Office of External Affairs at (202) 208-0004.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-29017  Filed 11-13-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J OS E E . C E R VA NT E S - GU E R R A, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 50578 D. C. No . 3 : 0 9 - c r - 0 1 3 8 8 - BE N ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia R oge rT . B e ni t e z , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jose E . C ervant es -G uerr a app ea l s f rom the 57 -m on th sent ence i m po se d f o llo w in g h is c o n v ic tio n f o rb e in g ad e p o rte da lie n f o u n din th e U n ite dS ta te s , in vi ol a t i on of

8 U . S . C . § 1326. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291, a nd w e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED MA R 09 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 50578 2 C ervant es -G uerr a c on t ends thatthe di stri ctcourt ’ s f ai l ure t o d epartor vary fr om the G ui del i nes t o ref l ec thi s l evel of cul pabi l i ty i n h i s pri or conv i ct i on cr ea t ed a n u n w a rr a n te ds e n te n c in g d is p a r itya n dr e s u lte din as u b s ta n tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le se n ten ce . T h e r ec o rd re flec ts th at th e d istrict co u rt co n sid er ed C er v an tes- G u erra ’s i ndi vi dua l c i r c um s t a nc e s w i th r e s pe c tt o hi s pr i orc onvi c t i on a nd i m pos e d a s e nt e nc e tha tw a s s ubs t a nt i ve l yr e a s onabl e i n l i ghtof the t ot a l i tyof

the c ir c u m s ta n c e s a n d th e 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) f a c to r s . See G al l

v. U ni ted States , 552 U . S . 38 , 51 (200 7). C e rv a n te s - G u e rr aa ls o c o n te n d s th a t h e w a s d e n ie dth e r ig h t o f a llo c u tio n . See F e d. R . C r i m . P . 32( i ) ( 4) ( A ) ( i i ) . T hi s a r gum e ntl a c ks m e r i tbe c aus e the se nt enci ng courtprop er l y provi ded C ervant es -G uerr a the op po rtun i ty t o speak e a r lie rin th e h e a r in g . See U n i ted S ta tes v. L ea su re , 12 2 F . 3d 83 7, 84 0-41 (9th C i r. 1997) ( pe rc ur i a m ) ( no de ni a l of r i ghtof a l l oc ut i on w he r e de f

e nda ntha d “ c l e a ra nd un re stri ct ed op po rtun i ty” t o speak du ri ng the se nt enci ng hear i ng bu tthe court re fu se d to p ro v id e a d d it io n al o p p o rtu n ity a fterb eg in n in g to p ro n o u n ce d ef en d an t’ s se nt ence ). AF F I RME D.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-6901-7] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of charter renewal.

The charter for the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC) will be renewed for an additional two-year period, as a necessary committee which is in the public interest, in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App § 9(c). The purpose of CAAAC is to provide advice and recommendations to the Administrator of EPA on issues associated with policy and technical issues associated with implementation of the Clean Air Act. 

It is determined that CAAAC is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the Agency by law. 

Inquiries may be directed to Paul Rasmussen, CAAAC Designated Federal Officer, U.S. EPA, Ariel Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460 (Mail code 6102A). 

Dated: October 31, 2000. 

Robert Perciasepe, 

Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation. 

[FR Doc. 00-29062 Filed 11-13-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
#### STEADMAN v. STATE.

No. 22609.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 3, 1943.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 5, 1944.

*578Elihu E. Berwald and Max R. Rosen-field, both of Dallas, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant pleaded guilty to murder without malice before the court without a jury and was assessed a penalty of two years in the state penitentiary, from which he appeals.

The indictment is regular. The record 'contains no bills of exception and no statement of facts. Nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing

DAVIDSON, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing, appellant for the first time attacks the sufficiency of the indictment to support the conviction.

The indictment follows substantially that which has been approved by this court. Simmons v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 169 S.W. 2d 171; Houston v. State, 143 Tex.Cr. 460, 158 S.W.2d 1004.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 9, 2021

No. 04-21-00281-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.M.M., A CHILD,

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20-0370-CV-A

Honorable Thomas Nathaniel Stuckey, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 368 U.S. 

738 (1967). After reviewing the brief, we find the brief is insufficient in light of our decision in 

In re N.F.M., 582 S.W.3d 539 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 19, 2018, no pet.). Specifically, 

while the brief concludes there are no arguable grounds to challenge the trial court’s findings on 

a predicate ground for termination, it does not contain any analysis showing whether counsel 

considered if there are arguable grounds to challenge the trial court’s finding that termination is 

in the best interest of the child. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 161.001 (trial court may order 

termination of the parent-child relationship only if it finds by clear and convincing evidence both 

a predicate ground for termination and that termination is in the best interest of the child); In re 

J.F.C., 96 S.W.3d 256, 295 (Tex. 2002) (same).

Accordingly, we ORDER appointed counsel’s Anders brief stricken and that the brief be 

redrawn.1 We ORDER the redrawn brief to be filed in this court by September 29, 2021. We 

further ORDER appointed counsel to notify appellant that the Anders brief has been stricken, 

that there is no current deadline for filing a pro se brief, and to provide this court with proof that 

he has notified appellant as ordered. 

1 We advise counsel to pay particular attention to the necessary components of an Anders brief as set out in our 

decision in N.F.M. See 582 S.W.3d at 541–44. Appointed counsel is instructed that pursuant to our decision in 

N.F.M., conclusory statements that the appeal is frivolous are inadequate; rather, appointed counsel must explain 

why and how he reached his conclusion that the appeal is frivolous. See Earle v. Ratliff, 998 S.W.2d 882, 890 (Tex. 

1999) (holding statement is conclusory if basis for statement is unexplained); CA Partners v. Spears, 274 S.W.3d 

51, 63 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, pet. denied) (holding that conclusory statement is one that does not 

provide underlying facts to support conclusion). 
_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of September, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                 MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                               753
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  75,753
<PP&E>                                                            73,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    54,244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    94,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          2,531,856
<BONDS>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                          18,151
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (2,455,466)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     94,541
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       0
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 131,445
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 9,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (140,945)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (140,945)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (140,945)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (.01)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.10






Reference
is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special
Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,as
Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodianand
WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS2
(the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant
to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from
July 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer,
has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4PthPday of March 2016.



Daniel
Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank



















Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KAREEN KENNETH WALKER
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3703

[ November 14, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; John Kastrenakes , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502012CF011220A

.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel Louis G. Carres, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fourth District, West Palm Beach for appellant.

Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B. Hernandez, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C
                                  SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winfield Capital Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scot
Perlin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ R. Scot Perlin
------------------------------------------
R. Scot Perlin
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)

Dated: August 13, 2003


                                      -20-
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Entrust Financial Services, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Jeffrey D. Rudolph, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: March
29, 2004 |  | By:/s/  Jeffrey D. Rudolph
      Jeffrey D. Rudolph, Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Carl PHILLIPS et al., Appellants v. CHICAGO R. I. & P. R. CO., Appellee.

No. 6271.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.

Jan. 26, 1953.

Rehearing Denied March 2, 1953.

Vickers, Vickers & Corbin, Lubbock, for appellants.

Underwood, Wilson, Sutton,, Heare & Boyce, Amarillo, and Thompson, Walker, Smith & Shannon, Fort Worth, fpr ap-pellee.

NORTHCUTT, Justice.

This case and the case of Peters v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co., Tex.Civ.App., 257 S.W.2d 860, are companion cases and, by agreement of the parties, were tried, briefed and presented together. The facts and pleadings were the same.

Since the rights of Carl Phillips to recover on his cause of action depend upon the actions of Herschel T. Peters, then the disposition of the Peters case disposes of this case; therefore, the judgment in said case is affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 8, 2022

No. 04-22-00187-CV

IN THE MATTER OF M.A.A.,

From the 436th District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020JUV01099A

Honorable Lisa Jarrett, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

 Appellant’s brief was originally due by June 15, 2022 and was not filed. On June 22, 

2022, this court notified appellant’s attorney, Patrick B. Montgomery, of the deficiency by letter. 

In our letter, we instructed Mr. Montgomery to file a written response stating a reasonable 

explanation for the delay within ten days. Our letter stated that if we did not receive an adequate 

response, we would abate this appeal to the trial court for an abandonment hearing and may 

initiate contempt proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (b)(4). As of the date of this order, 

we have not received the brief, a motion for extension of time to file the brief, or the response 

required by our June 22 letter. 

We therefore ORDER Patrick B. Montgomery to file appellant’s brief by July 18, 2022. 

If neither the brief nor an extension of time to file the brief is filed by the date ordered, we will 

abate this appeal to the trial court for an abandonment hearing without further notice, and the 

trial court will be asked to consider whether sanctions are appropriate. See id.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of July, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court