alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 119 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 119

   To designate the weeks beginning May 2, 1993, and May 1, 1994, as 
                ``National Correctional Officers Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1993

    Mr. Bonior introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   To designate the weeks beginning May 2, 1993, and May 1, 1994, as 
                ``National Correctional Officers Week''.

Whereas the correctional officers who work in America's jails and prisons are 
        responsible for the containment and control of over 1,200,000 prisoners;
Whereas correctional officers must protect inmates from violence while 
        encouraging them to develop skills and attitudes that can help them 
        become productive members of society following their release;
Whereas the morale of correctional officers is affected by many factors, and the 
        public perception of the role of correctional officers is more often 
        based upon dramatization rather than factual review;
Whereas good job performance and public acceptance and appreciation require 
        correctional officers to absorb the adverse attitudes present in 
        confinement while maintaining themselves as professionals;
Whereas correctional officers have been honored by many States and localities;
Whereas correctional officers have been honored by joint resolutions of the 
        Senate and House of Representatives of the United States in 1984, 1985, 
        1987, and 1989; and
Whereas the attitude and morale of correctional officers is a matter worthy of 
        serious congressional attention: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the weeks beginning May 
2, 1993, and May 1, 1994, are designated as ``National Correctional 
Officers Week''. The President is requested to issue a proclamation 
calling on the people of the United States to observe such weeks with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.2

                                   PSINET INC.

   CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE AND WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
                       USED IN CALCULATION (UNAUDITED) (1)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                           SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                                            JUNE 30, 1999
                                                                                                            -------------
<S>                                                                                                              <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Common stock:
         Shares outstanding at beginning of period........................................................       52,083,639
         Weighted average shares issued during the six months ended June 30, 1999
         (12,593,858 shares) .............................................................................        5,573,481
                                                                                                              -------------
                                                                                                                 57,657,120
                                                                                                              -------------
                                                                                                              -------------

Net loss available to common shareholders .................................................................   $(121,250,000)
                                                                                                              -------------
                                                                                                              -------------

Basic and diluted loss per share...............................................................................      $(2.10)
                                                                                                              -------------
                                                                                                              -------------
</TABLE>

(1)  For a description of basic and diluted loss per share, see Note 1 of the
     Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's Annual
     Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 as filed with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. 

*Docket Number:*                     00-030.                     *Applicant:*                     Central Institute for the Deaf, St. Louis, MO 63110.                     *Instrument:*                    Electron Microscope, Model H-7500.                     *Manufacturer:*                     Hitachi, Japan.                     *Intended Use:*                     See notice at 65 FR 59175, October 4, 2000.                     *Order Date:*                     March 3, 2000.                 

*Comments:*                     None received.                     *Decision:*                     Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such purposes as the instrument is intended to be used, was being manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was ordered.                     *Reasons:*                     The foreign instrument is a conventional transmission electron microscope (CTEM) and is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring a CTEM. We know of no CTEM, or any other instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in the United States at the time of order of the instrument.                 

Gerald A. Zerdy, 

Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs Staff. 

[FR Doc. 00-29254 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted), S. James Miller, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of ImageWareSystems, Inc. (the ***“Company”***),hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.               The Company’squarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the ***“Report”***) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition of the Company at the end of the periods covered by theReport and the results of operations of the Company for the periods covered bythe Report.

 

 
| Dated:   August 14, 2006                 |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                          |   |
| /s/ S. James Miller                           |   |
| S. James Miller, Jr.  Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to ImageWare Systems, Inc. and will befurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
UAS DRONE CORP

  UAS DRONE CORP.
 SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
 

 

 UAS Drone Corp.
 420 Royal Palm Way, Suite 100
 Palm Beach, Florida  33480
 

 RE: UAS Drone Corp. Common Stock
 

 Ladies and Gentlemen:
 

 The undersigned Investor in this Subscription Agreement hereby acknowledges receipt of the Prospectus, dated __________________, 2015, of UAS Drone Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and subscribes for the following number of shares upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Prospectus.
 

 The Investor agrees that this Subscription Agreement is subject to review and acceptance by the Company.
 

 The Investor hereby subscribes for ____________shares of the Company’s common stock (“Common Stock”) at $1.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $____________.
 

 Payment of $____________as payment in full of the purchase price is being made via check directly to the Company and delivered to the Company at its address indicated above.
 

 If this subscription is rejected by the Company, in whole or in part, for any reason, all funds will be returned within three business days of the Company’s receipt of such funds, without interest or deduction of any kind.
 

 	
	 Purchaser Information:


 

 	 	
	 Printed Name:
	  

	  
	  

	 Signature:
	  

	  
	  

	 Date:
	  

	  
	  

	 Address:
	  

	  
	  


 

 	
	  

	  

	 _____The foregoing Subscription is hereby accepted in full on behalf of UAS Drone Corp.

	 OR

	 _____The foregoing Subscription is hereby rejected in full by UAS Drone Corp. and all of the funds therefor are returned to the Investor.


 

 	 	
	 Date ___________________.

	  
	  

	 UAS Drone Corp.:

	  
	  

	  
	  

	 By:
	  

	 Name:
	  

	 Title:
May 22 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

LEANDREW SMITH , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00716

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0101. RASHAAD DANIEL CARSON v. THE STATE.

Rashaad Carson pleaded guilty to armed robbery, cruelty to children in the first

degree, possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony, and three counts of

aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. This Court affirmed his convictions and

sentence on direct appeal. See Carson v. State, 314 Ga. App. 225 (723 SE2d 516)

(2012), overruled, in part, by Nazario v. State, 293 Ga. 480, 483 (2) (a) n. 1, 489 (2)

(d) (746 SE2d 109) (2013). After Carson filed a motion to correct a void sentence,

the trial court granted the motion in part, merging one of the aggravated assault

convictionsinto the armed robbery conviction. Since then, Carson hasfiled numerous

pro se motions, including additional motions challenging his sentence as void. On

August 21, 2018, the trial court entered an order denyingCarson’s mostrecent motion

to vacate void sentence. Carson then filed this application for discretionary review. 

An appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or correct a void

sentence, but only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in

fact, void. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 217 n.1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg

v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). “Motions to vacate a void

sentence generally are limited to claims that – even assuming the existence and

validity of the conviction for which the sentence was imposed – the law does not

authorize thatsentence, most typically because it exceedsthe mostsevere punishment

for which the applicable penal statute provides.” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569,

572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). Thus, when a sentence is within the statutory range

of punishment, it is not void. Jones v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483)

(2004).

October 17, 2018
Carson has not provided us with a copy of the motion he filed in the trial court. 

In his application, however, he contends that his sentence is void because his

indictment did not charge all the essential elements of the crime. This is not a valid

void-sentence argument. See id. 

To the extentCarson’s claimconcerning the sufficiencyof hisindictment could

be construed as a motion in arrest of judgment, the motion is untimely because it was

not filed during the term of court at which the judgment was obtained. See OCGA

§ 17-9-61 (b); Hammond v. State, 292 Ga. 237, 238 (734 SE2d 396) (2012).

For the foregoing reasons, Carson is not entitled to discretionary review of the

trial court’s order denying his motion to vacate void sentence. This application is

hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/17/2018
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 222 (Thursday, November 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69339-69340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29293]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree

    Notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in the matter 
The Surfrider Foundation v. John M. Bernal, Case No. 99-CV-2441-
BTM(JFS) (S.D. Cal.), was lodged with the United States District Court 
for the Southern District of California on October 16, 2000. The 
proposed Consent Decree concerns alleged violations of Section 402 of 
the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. Sec. 1342, at the South Bay 
International Wastewater Treatment Plant, located at 2415 Dairy Mart 
Road, San Diego County, San Diego, California.
    The proposed Consent Decree would require (1) the performance of 
certain environmental studies and evaluations relating to discharge of 
wastewater from the Plant, and (2) the United States Section of the 
International Boundary and Water Commission to complete a secondary 
sewage treatment project for the Plant.
    The United States Department of Justice will receive written 
comments relating to the proposed Consent Decree for a period of thirty 
(30) days from the date of publication of this notice. Comments should 
be addressed to S. Randall Humm, Trial Attorney, United States 
Department of Justice, Environmental Defense Section, P.O. Box 23986, 
Washington, D.C. 20026-3986, with copies provided to William A. Wilcox, 
Jr., International Boundary and Water Commission, Office of the Staff 
Counsel, 4171 No. Mesa Street; Suite C-310, El Paso, TX 79902, and 
Robert Moyer, Assistant Regional Counsel, United States Environmental 
Protection Agency--Region IX, U.S. EPA Border Office, 610 West Ash 
Street, Suite 703, San Diego, California, and should reference The 
Surfrider Foundation v. John M. Bernal, Case No. 99-CV-2441-BTM(JFS) 
(S.D. Cal.).

[[Page 69340]]

    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the Southern District of California, 
4290 Edward J. Schwartz Federal Building, 880 Front Street, San Diego, 
California.

Letitia J. Grishaw,
Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and Natural Resources 
Division, Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 00-29293 Filed 11-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015, by andamong DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS,LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee,and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator,Paying Agent and Custodian and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as OperatingAdvisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM2015-PC1 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersignedhas executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





S. James Miller, Chief Executive Officer of ImageWare Systems, Inc. (the “Company”), and Wayne Wetherell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that, to the best of his knowledge:





1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and





2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Quarterly Report.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 29th day of April, 2010.





/s/    S. James MillerS. James MillerChief Executive Officer/s/    Wayne WetherellWayne WetherellChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ImageWare Systems, Inc. and will be retained by ImageWare Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                REPRESENTATION OF
                              INVESTOR SUITABILITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                             RPM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

INVESTMENT IN THE SHARES INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK AND IS SUITABLE ONLY FOR
THOSE INVESTORS WHO HAVE  SUBSTANTIAL  FINANCIAL  RESOURCES IN RELATION TO THEIR
INVESTMENT AND WHO UNDERSTAND THE PARTICULAR RISK FACTORS OF THE INVESTMENT.  IN
ADDITION,  INVESTMENT  IN THE SHARES IS SUITABLE  ONLY FOR  INVESTORS WHO DO NOT
NEED LIQUIDITY IN THEIR INVESTMENT IN THE SECURITIES.

The undersigned investor, ___________________ makes the following warranties and
representations:

A.       Investor suitability:

Shares will be sold only to those investors who submit a Confidential  Purchaser
Questionnaire to the Company in the form set forth. Each investor must establish
to the satisfaction of the Company that:

       1. The  investor,  either  alone or with  his  duly  appointed  Purchaser
       Representative,  as defined  in  Regulation  D of the 1933 Act,  has such
       knowledge  and  experience  in financial  and  business  matters that the
       investor is able to evaluate  the merits and risks in the  investment  in
       the Shares;

       2. The investor has the financial ability to bear the economic risk of an
       investment  in the Shares,  adequate  means of providing  for his current
       needs  and  personal  contingencies,  and no need  for  liquidity  in the
       investment of the Shares; and 3. The investor is acquiring the Shares for
       his own investment, and not with a view to resale or distribution.

B.       Ability to accept limitations on transferability:

A public  market for the  Shares  does not  currently  exist,  and,  if one does
develop, there is no assurance that it will be sustained for any length of time.
Moreover,   the  transferability  of  the  Shares  may  be  subject  to  certain
restrictions  on resale as imposed  under  state and  federal  securities  laws.
Therefore,  this  investment  is  suitable  only for  investors  who do not need
liquidity for their investment.

I HEREBY WARRANT THAT I HAVE READ AND  UNDERSTOOD  THE PROVISIONS  LISTED ABOVE,
AND THAT I AM AWARE THAT MY ENTIRE  INVESTMENT  IN THESE  SHARES  WILL GO TO THE
COMPANY TO USE FOR FINANCING AND SALES  PURPOSES.  I HAVE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO
OBTAIN THE ADVICE OF MY ATTORNEY,  TAX  CONSULTANT,  AND  BUSINESS  ADVISOR WITH
RESPECT TO THE LEGAL,  TAX, AND  BUSINESS  ASPECTS OF THIS  INVESTMENT  PRIOR TO
SUBSCRIBING FOR THE SECURITIES OFFERED HEREBY.

------------------------                                      --------------
Individually                                                  Date