alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP99-176-021]

Take notice that on October 31, 2000, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America (Natural) tendered for filing to be a part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, Original Sheet No. 26L, 26M and 26N, to be effective November 1, 2000.

Natural states that the purpose of this filing is to implement three (3) negotiated rate transactions with Laclede Gas Company and Central Illinois Light Company under Natural's Rate Schedule FTS pursuant to Section 49 of the General Terms and Conditions of Natural's Tariff.

Natural states that copies of the filing are being mailed to its customers, interested state commissions and all parties set out on the Commission's official service list in Docket No. RP99-176.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 187 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-28933  Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 42397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2015-16385]

[[Page 42397]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 60

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0696; FRL-9929-25-OAR]
RIN 2060-AR81

Performance Specification 18--Performance Specifications and Test 
Procedures for Hydrogen Chloride Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems 
at Stationary Sources

Correction

    In rule document 2015-16385, appearing on pages 38628 through 38652 
in the issue of Tuesday, July 7, 2015, make the following correction:
    On page 38646, in the first column, in the last paragraph, in the 
sixth line, ``+5'' should read ``5''.
[FR Doc. C1-2015-16385 Filed 7-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1505-01-P
```
Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Advisory Board (NCAB), February 15, 2000, 9:00 AM to February 16, 2000, 12:00 PM, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 31, C Wing, 6th Floor, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 28, 2000, 65 FR 4563.                

In lieu of a face-to-face meeting, the NCAB will now convene by way of a telephone conference call on Wednesday, February 16, 2000, between the hours of 10:00 AM to 12;15 PM.

The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to observe the open portion of the telephone conference call and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodation, should notify the contact person listed below in advance of the meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Advisory Board.                    

*Date:*                         February 16, 2000 (Teleconference).                    

*Open:*                         February 16, 10:00 a.m. to 11:40 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         Approval of December 1999 meeting minutes; annual approval of operating guidelines and delegation of authority; Director's Report; other business of the Board.                    

*Closed:*                         February 16, 2000, 11:45 a.m. to Adjournment.                    

*Agenda:*                         Review of Grant Applications.                    

*Place:*                         Building 31 C, Wing, 6 Floor Conference Room 10, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Marvin R. Kalt, Executive Secretary, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 8th Floor, Room 8022, Bethesda, MD 20892-8327, (301) 496-5147.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cencer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 3, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-2911  Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Case 3:22-cr-00139-X Document 39 Filed 08/03/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 68
- 1 -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION – DISTRICT COURT

Mr. Michael Moates, MA, QBA, LBA, 

Plaintiff

v.

Michael Arismendez, in his capacity as Executive 

Director of the Texas Department of Licensing and 

Regulation;

Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation; and

Behavior Analyst Certification Board;

Case No.: 4:22-cv-00262-P-BJ 

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Case 4:22-cv-00262-P Document 15 Filed 04/24/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 151
- 2 -

Please take notice of dismissal and notification of intent to take action in state court.

SERVICE

1. Plaintiff Moates can be served and consents to service via email if service is sent to both email addresses: 

michaelsmoates@gmail.com and michael@gibpe.org

2. Defendants Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation and its Executive Director have consented to 

service via email on 8 February 2022. The email is Elizabeth.Salinas-Strittmatter@tdlr.texas.gov. See 

Exhibit H.

3. Defendant Behavior Analyst Certification Board can be served at Behavior Analyst Certification Board, 

7950 Shaffer Parkway, Littleton, CO 80127.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Michael S. Moates, MA, QBA, LBA

michael@gibpe.org

michaelsmoates@gmail.com

2700 Colorado Boulevard #1526

Denton, TX 76210

Cell Phone: 817-999-7534

Case 4:22-cv-00262-P Document 15 Filed 04/24/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 152
Case 4:22-cv-00334-P     Document 22     Filed 06/06/22      Page 1 of 2     PageID 94

Case 4:22-cv-00334-P     Document 22     Filed 06/06/22      Page 2 of 2     PageID 95
#### GREEN v. STATE.

No. 25627.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 9, 1952.

No attorney pn appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, -for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the theft of one head of cattle; the penalty assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for two years.

All the proceedings appear regular. The record is before this court without a statement of facts or hills of exception, in the absence of which no question is brought forward for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Rocky Mountain (PADD 4) Natural Gas Consumed at Refineries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Rocky Mountain (PADD 4) Natural Gas Consumed at Refineries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 9,714  | 11,956 | 11,001 | 8,203  | 9,982 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 12,706 | 17,734 | 15,893 | 17,483 | 15,379 | NA     | 18,252 | NA     | 16,863 | 21,701
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 19,431 | 20,081 | 21,274 | 18,783 | 19,324 | 21,585 | 24,830 | 22,513 | 22,762 | 25,022
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 25,287 | 26,101 | 26,971 | 29,475 | 29,063 | 28,953 | 29,716 | 27,825 | 29,527 | 29,465
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 29,999 | 26,939 | 27,807 | 27,999 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
#### YOWELL v. STATE.

No. 24995.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 20, 1950.

Florence & Florence and Harry L. Williams, all of Gilmer, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for a violation of the State Food and Drug Law. Vernon’s Ann. P.C. art. 706 et seq. The penalty assessed is a fine of $100.

Appellant was convicted under the following allegation in the information:

“ * * * did then and there unlawfully manufacture for sale, and have in his possession with the intent to sell, and offer to sell an article of food which was then and there adulterated in this, to-wit:

“A substance, to-wit: saccharin, was then and there mixed with said article of food so as to lower and injuriously affect the quality and strength of said article of food, and a valuable constituent of said article, to-wit: sugar, was then and there wholly and in part abstracted therefrom, and said article was below the standard of quality and purity represented to the consumer thereof; and said article was an article used by man for drink, and was then and there an article so used as a beverage, and was then and there commonly known by the name of orange drink being also called soda water,” etc.

There are two bills of exception in the record.

Bill No. 2 is disapproved by the trial judge and disallowed and is therefore not considered by us.

Bill No. 1 complains of the insufficiency of the information on many grounds. Suffice it to say that the information seems to be in accord with Willson’s Criminal Forms, 5th Edition, Form No. 325, page 208. See Dorsey v. State, 38 Tex.Cr.R. 527, 44 S.W. 514, 40 L.R.A. 201; Ex parte Drane, 80 Tex.Cr.R. 543, 191 S.W. 1156. We think the information alleged the constituent elements of an offense.

The testimony shows that to an extent sugar had been replaced by saccharin in the manufacture of this orange drink, thus adulterating the same and lowering its quality and strength.

No error being shown, the judgment will be affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

VS, § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-208-K (01) 

 § 

PHILLIP CURTIS SPILLMAN § 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

PHILLIP CURTIS SPILLMAN, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 

261 (5th Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty

to Count 1 of the 2-Count Indictment, filed on May 24, 2022. After cautioning and examining Defendant

Phillip Curtis Spillman, under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined 

that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend 

that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that Defendant Phillip Curtis Spillman, be adjudged guilty of

Possession of a Controlled Substance With Intent to Distribute, in violation of 21 USC § 841(a) and 

(b)(1(C), and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the district 

judge. 

□ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. 

□ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear 

and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released. 

□ The Government does not oppose release. 

□ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release. 

□ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to 

any other person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or 

(c).

□ The Government opposes release.

□ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release. 

□ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

□ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there 

is a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly 

shown under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released. 

 Signed May 16, 2023. ____________________________________ 

 REBECCA RUTHERFORD

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date 

of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United 

States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B).

Case 3:22-cr-00208-K Document 32 Filed 05/16/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 70
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION ORIGINAL 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

vs 

LUIS CURIEL 4:22-CR-132-P(0 1) 

ORDER SETTING ADDITIONAL TERMS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE 

The required Mandatory Conditions listed at 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) and Section 5D1.3(a) of 

the Guidelines Manual, including: 

1. You must not commit another federal , state or local crime. 

2. You must not unlawfully possess a controlled substance. 

3. You must refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. You must submit 

to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and at least two 

periodic drug tests thereafter, as determined by the court. 

IZIThe above drug testing condition is suspended, based on the court's 

determination that you pose a low risk of future substance abuse. ( check if 

applicable) 

4. IZIYou must cooperate in the collection of DNA as directed by the probation officer. 

( check if applicable) 

5. IZI You must comply with the requirements of the Sex Offender Registration and 

Notification Act (34 U.S.C. § 20901 , et seq.) as directed by the probation officer, 

the Bureau of Prisons, or any state sex offender registration agency in the location 

where you reside, work, are a student, or were convicted of a qualifying offense. 

( check if applicable) 

6. DY ou must participate in an approved program for domestic violence. ( check if 

applicable) 

7. You must make restitution in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §§ 2248, 2259, 2264, 

2327, 3663, 3663A, and 3664. (check if applicable) 

8. You must pay the assessment imposed in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3013. 

9. If this judgment imposes a fine, you must pay in accordance with the Schedule of 

Payments sheet of this judgment. 

Case 4:22-cr-00132-P Document 32 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 98
Luis Curiel 

Page 2 

AND 

The discretionary Standard Conditions set forth by Miscellaneous Order No. 64, as well as 

the below-listed "Discretionary," "Special," and "Additional" Conditions listed at Sections 

5D1.3(b), (d), and (e) of the Guidelines Manual-which, based on the facts and 

circumstances of the above-referenced case, are (A) reasonably related to the factors set 

forth in 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a)(l), (a)(2)(B), (a)(2)(C), and (a)(2)(D); (B) involve no greater 

deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary for the purposes set forth in Section 

3553(a)(2)(B), (a)(2)(C), and (a)(2)(D); and (C) consistent with any pertinent policy 

statements issued by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(a) 

("Notice"): ): 

1. en ant shall provide to the probation officer complete access to all business 

d per nal fi al information. (Macro 18A) 

Case 4:22-cr-00132-P Document 32 Filed 09/15/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 99
#### GRIFFIN v. STATE.

No. 26055.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 19, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for failure to stop and render aid as defined in Art. 1150, P.C.; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The facts are essentially the same as found in Griffin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 250 S.W.2d 223, wherein the conviction of appellant for murder under Art. 802c, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., was reversed. As remarked in the opinion in that case, the evidence sustains the conviction for the offense here *charged;*that is, the failure of appellant to stop and render aid to the person struck and injured.

The reversal of the murder conviction makes it unnecessary that we pass upon the question of whether the conviction for murder could be successfully pleaded as a former conviction (or former jeopardy) in the subsequent prosecution for failure to stop and render aid to the victim of the murder, who had been struck and fatally injured.

No reversible error is found in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT
      32.1








STATEMENT
      OF GEORGE L. JONES,


PRESIDENT
      AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF BORDERS GROUP, INC.


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I,
      George
      L. Jones, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 28, 2006,
      of
      Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
      that
      the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Borders
      Group, Inc.




















Date:
      November 30, 2006







/s/
      GEORGE L. JONES


George
      L.
      Jones


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


Borders
      Group, Inc.
<PAGE> 1                                                EXHIBIT 11.

MUSTANG SOFTWARE, INC.

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(In thousands, except earnings per share) (Unaudited)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>

                                           Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
                                                September 30,   September 30,
                                             1999       1998     1999       1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding                          4,695      4,063    4,510     3,644
Common stock equivlents from outstanding
stock options                                   0          0        0          0
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average common and common stock
equivalents outstanding                     4,695      4,063    4,510     3,644
================================================================================
Net Income                                  $(229)    $ (263)  $ (332)  $ 1,010)
================================================================================
Earnings per share (1)                     $(.05)    $ (.06)  $ (.07)   $  (.28)
================================================================================
</TABLE>

(1) Fully diluted earnings per share have not been presented because the effects
are not material.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Contents

Data 1

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngwhhda.htm

infoctr@eia.doe.gov

# Data 1

Back to Contents
Case 3:22-cr-00180-N Document 30 Filed 10/27/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 85
Case 3:22-cr-00203-K Document 20 Filed 02/14/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 29