alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 76

Regarding broadcasting by Radio Free Europe to the former Yugoslavia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 1993

Mr. LEVY (for himself, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. SOLOMON, Ms. MOLINARI, and Mr.

KING) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Regarding broadcasting by Radio Free Europe to the former

Yugoslavia.

Whereas the conflict among the states of the former Yugoslavia is being exacerbated by propaganda and distorted

news coverage disseminated by state-controlled media in

the region;

Whereas due to such government-controlled propaganda and

control of the local media the peoples of the republics of

the former Yugoslavia, Serbia in particular, do not have

access to objective, unbiased reporting of the situation either in the Balkans or in the outside world;

Whereas access to objective, unbiased news coverage by the

peoples of the former Yugoslavia will be an important element in the eventual peaceful settlement of disputes and
2

HCON 76 IH

development of cooperation among the successor states of

the former Yugoslavia;

Whereas the content and techniques of broadcasting from respected and established institutions outside of the region

can contribute to a moderation of the conflicts among the

states of the former Yugoslavia by providing a vitally

needed, balanced alternative to propaganda disseminated

by certain governments in the region, particularly Serbia,

and by stressing the need for reconciliation, democratization, and cooperation among the former Yugoslav states;

Whereas events elsewhere in Eastern and Central Europe

have demonstrated that dissemination of truthful, credible information and analysis can play a significant role

in peaceful, democratic transformation; and

Whereas the broadcast activity of Radio Free Europe has

played an important role in the transformation of the nations of Central Europe from communism toward democracy and the rule of the law: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress urges the Board for Inter3 national Broadcasting—

4 (1) to authorize RFE/RL, Incorporated to com5 mence immediate broadcast activity of Radio Free

6 Europe to the successor states of Yugoslavia;

7 (2) to ensure that such broadcast activity pro8 vides to the people of the region objective balanced

9 reporting of developments in the former Yugoslav

10 states and international reaction to the situation in

11 the former Yugoslavia so as to contribute to a peace-
3

HCON 76 IH

1 ful negotiated resolution of political and ethnic con2 flict among and within such states; and

3 (3) to ensure that such new broadcasting serv4 ice is adequately staffed with professional journalists

5 constituting a fair representation of the major ethnic

6 groups of the region who are trained and dedicated

7 to nonpartisan and objective analysis of the prob8 lems confronting the former Yugoslav states.

Æ
Complete

Incomplete

Not Applicable To Rule

Material Missing

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V. Section 21)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee x x

(b) Evidence of adoption X X

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt x x

(dl) Copy of actual rule/plan X X

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out x x

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements x x

(f) Copy of public notice X X

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice X X

(h) Public comments & agency response x x

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified X X

(b) Affected sources & attainment, status identified X X

~(c) Rule/plan emissions impact N/A N/A

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions N/A X

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements N/A X

(i) Justiflcation for deviation from EPA policy N/A N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS C C I

EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

Submittal Date June 21, 2011

District Name Eastern Kern APCD

Date Reviewed June 30, 2011

EPA Reviewer C.G. Allen

Key:

C =

NIA=

0 =

j102 202 1

Notes:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ACCLARENT, INC.,

Appellant

v.

FORD ALBRITTON, IV,

Appellee

______________________

2018-2377

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-

00498.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

WILLIAM C. ROOKLIDGE, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, 

Irvine, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by 

TAYLOR KING; LISA J. ADAMS, PETER CUOMO, Mintz, Levin, 

Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., Boston, MA.

 ASHLEY NICOLE MOORE, McKool Smith, PC, Dallas, TX, 

argued for appellee. Also represented by ALEXANDRA 

FIGARI EASLEY, MEREDITH ANNE ELKINS. 

______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, WALLACH and 

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

October 4, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-212-X

§

DERRIC COLEMAN (1) §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of 

Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of 

the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of 

service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the 

Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and DERRIC COLEMAN

(1) is hereby adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2) – Possession of a Firearm. Sentence 

will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

 The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court adopts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing 

evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who 

set the conditions of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the 

defendant is likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under 

§ 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination 

of whether it has been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) 

why the defendant should not be detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by 

clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This matter shall be referred to the 

United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

Signed this 15th day of September, 2023.

________________________________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cr-00212-X Document 38 Filed 09/15/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 65
EXHIBIT
      32.1








STATEMENT
      OF GEORGE L. JONES,


PRESIDENT
      AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF BORDERS GROUP, INC.


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I,
      George
      L. Jones, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 5, 2007, of
      Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
      that
      the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Borders
      Group, Inc.




















Date:
      June 12, 2007





/s/
        GEORGE L. JONES


George
      L.
      Jones


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


Borders
      Group, Inc.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 129273 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129273 COA: 259913 Wayne CC: 98-005750 RICHARD HODGSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 24, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d1121 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2005

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 68161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Workforce Investment Act: Native American Employment and Training 
Council

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and section 166(h)(4) of the 
Workforce Investment Act (WIA) [29 U.S.C. 2911(h)(4)], notice is hereby 
given of the initial meeting of the Native American Employment and 
Training Council as constituted under WIA.

TIME AND DATE: The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. EST on Monday, December 
4, 2000, and continue until 5 p.m. EST that day. The meeting will 
reconvene at 9 a.m. EST on Tuesday, December 5, 2000, and adjourn at 
2:55 p.m. EST on that day. The period from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. EST on 
December 4 will be reserved for participation and presentation by 
members of the public.

PLACE: The Monday session will be held in Room N-5437 A, B, and C, 
Frances Perkins Building, the U.S. Department of Labor, 200 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. The Tuesday session 
will be held in the Arlington Room of the Hyatt Regency Crystal City 
Hotel, 2799 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22202.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The agenda will focus on the following 
topics: (1) Comments from the Department on overall employment and 
training issues; (2) FACA orientation for Council Members; (3) status 
of WIA implementation efforts; (4) discussion of WIA management issues; 
(5) the Council report to the Department and Congress; (6) status of 
technical assistance and training provision for PYs 2000 and 2001; and 
(7) status of the PY 2000 Partnership Plan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James C. DeLuca, Chief, Division of 
Indian and Native American Programs, Office of National Programs, 
Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room 
N-4641, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
    Telephone: (202) 219-8502 ext 119 (VOICE) or (202) 326-2577 (TDD) 
(these are not toll-free numbers).

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of November, 2000.
James C. DeLuca,
Acting Director, Office of National Programs.
[FR Doc. 00-29040 Filed 11-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
#### GLEGHORN v. STATE.

No. 22923.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 25, 1944.

E. F. Fruechte, of Wichita Falls, and Rollie Fancher, of Seymour, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty, of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for a violation of the liquor law of Baylor County, and a sentence of five months in jail and a fine of $400.

There was a search made of appellant’s premises under a search warrant based.upon an affidavit similar in all things to the affidavit and warrant in Jones v. State, Tex. Cr.App., 182 S.W.2d 919, this day decided, there being only the difference in the names of the accused and description of the property. In this case, as in the Jones case, both the affidavit and warrant fail to show that the place desired to be searched was possessed, occupied by, or in charge of, or in control of the appellant, but merely denominates the same as “the premises of W. G. Gleghorn.’’

This allegation in the affidavit was insufficient upon which to base a search warrant, and the testimony obtained by reason of such search should not have been admitted.

The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: 

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical Sciences (1204).                    

*Date and Time:*                         November 30, 2000 through December 2, 2000; 8:30 a.m. until 5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Alvin Thaler, Program Director, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-4863.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposal submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate proposals concerning the Foundations Panel Meeting, as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: November 6, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-28784  Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) intends to submit to the Office of Management and Budget a request for review of an expiring information collection. Procedures for Submitting Compensation and Leave Claims is used to collect information from current and former Federal employees who are submitting a claim for compensation and/or leave. OPM needs this information in order to adjudicate the claim. 

Approximately 100 claims are submitted annually. It takes approximately 60 minutes to compile the information needed to submit a claim. The annual estimated burden is 100 hours. 

Comments are particularly invited on: 
      - Whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of the Office of Personnel Management, and whether it will have practical utility;
      - Whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; and
      - Ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, through use of the appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

                        For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on (202) 606-8358, or E-mail to                         *mbtoomey@opm.gov.*

# DATES:

Comments on this proposal should be received on or before January 8, 2001. 

# ADDRESSES:

                        Send or deliver comments to—Melissa A. Drummond, Program Manager, Office of Merit Systems Oversight, Office of Merit Systems                               ( print page 67419)                            Oversight and Effectiveness, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW, Room 7671, Washington, DC 20415.                    

Office of Personnel Management. 

Janice R. Lachance, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 00-28790 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325-01-P
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 263

Providing for an adjournment or recess of the two Houses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 29, 1994

Mr. GEPHARDT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment or recess of the two Houses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Thursday, June 30, 1994, it stand adjourned

4 until 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, July 12, 1994, or until noon

5 on the second day after Members are notified to reassem6 ble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

7 whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses

8 or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, June

9 30, 1994, Friday, July 1, 1994, Saturday, July 2, 1994,

10 or Sunday, July 3, 1994, pursuant to a motion made by

11 the majority leader or his designee, in accordance with this

12 resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on
2

HCON 263 ATH

1 Monday, July 11, 1994, or at such time on that day as

2 may be specified by the majority leader or his designee

3 in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the

4 second day after Members are notified to reassemble pur5 suant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever

6 occurs first.

7 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority

8 leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

9 the minority leader of the House and the minority leader

10 of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and

11 the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their

12 opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 253

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the amount made available for

fiscal year 1995 for the program of the Department of Housing and

Urban Development under section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959

for supportive housing for low-income elderly persons should not be

reduced from the amount made available for fiscal year 1994.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 9, 1994

Mr. GALLO (for himself, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. MANTON, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr.

HAYES, Mr. BLUTE, Mr. EMERSON, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. LAZIO, Mr.

ENGEL, Ms. MOLINARI, Mr. MARTINEZ, and Mr. DEFAZIO) submitted

the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the amount made

available for fiscal year 1995 for the program of the

Department of Housing and Urban Development under

section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959 for supportive

housing for low-income elderly persons should not be

reduced from the amount made available for fiscal year

1994.

Whereas since its inception 35 years ago, the program under

section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959 for developing

housing for low-income elderly persons has successfully

created, through partnerships with private, nonprofit
2

HCON 253 IH

sponsors, more than 250,000 safe and affordable units

for senior citizens throughout the United States;

Whereas despite the continuing success of the program, there

remains a high demand among low-income senior citizens

in the United States for dwelling units in housing assisted under section 202, evidenced by the waiting lists

for occupancy in such housing, which on average consist

of 8 persons for each vacancy occurring in such housing;

Whereas the number of persons eligible for residency in housing assisted under section 202 will continue to increase;

Whereas low-income senior citizens in the United States deserve the opportunity to live in safe, affordable housing;

and

Whereas the President’s budget of the United States Government for fiscal year 1995 proposes reducing the amount

available for assistance under section 202 of such Act for

development of housing for low-income elderly persons by

87 percent from the amount made available for such assistance in fiscal year 1994: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 amount made available for fiscal year 1995 for assistance

4 under section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959 for the de5 velopment of supportive housing for low-income elderly

6 persons should not be reduced from the amount made

7 available for such assistance for fiscal year 1994.

Æ