alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant To**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of LaSalle Hotel Properties (“LHO”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hans S. Weger, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of LHO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of LHO. 

 

February 22, 2006
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors, PNCFinancial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland LoanServices, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland”or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for alltransactions serviced on the *Enterprise!* Loan Management System (the“Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing ofselected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that Midland complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 forthe Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816)218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*

* *
Case 4:22-cr-00073-O Document 70 Filed 03/30/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 155
Case 4:22-cr-00073-O Document 70 Filed 03/30/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 156
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130547 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130547 

 COA: 257845 

Calhoun CC: 2003-003708-FH 

ROSWOLD PALL ADKINS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 19, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0619 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2006 

Clerk
H. J. Res. 101

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

Joint Resolution

To designate February 21 through February 27, 1993, as ‘‘National FFA Organization

Awareness Week’’.

Whereas the National FFA Organization was founded as a leadership organization for students of agriculture education in public

schools;

Whereas each member lives by the FFA motto of Learning to

Do, Doing to Learn, Earning to Live, Living to Serve;

Whereas the primary goal of the National FFA Organization is

dedicated to develop competent agricultural leadership, citizenship, and cooperation;

Whereas as the National FFA Organization is comprised of approximately 400,000 members in all 50 States, Puerto Rico, the District

of Columbia, Guam, ROTA (Commonwealth of Northern Mariana

Islands), Federated States of Micronesia, and the Marshall

Islands;

Whereas the National FFA Organization prepares a student for

post-secondary education or employment following high school;

Whereas the National FFA Organization is only open to those

students enrolled in approved agricultural education programs;

Whereas the National FFA Organization was formally organized

on November 20, 1928;

Whereas the National FFA Organization was organized to foster

character development, agricultural leadership, and responsible

citizenship and to supplement training opportunities for students

preparing for careers in agriscience, production agriculture, and

agribusiness; and

Whereas the FFA is a national organization of high school agriculture students preparing for careers in agricultural production,

processing, supply and service, mechanics, horticulture, forestry,

and natural resources: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the week
H. J. Res. 101—2

of February 21 through February 27, 1993, is designated as

‘‘National FFA Organization Awareness Week’’, and the President

of the United States is authorized and requested to issue a

proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe

the week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Extension Letter with Brian K. Hutchison



 Exhibit 10.1 
  





 
 August 28, 2015 

Mr. Brian K. Hutchison 
 President & Chief
Executive Officer 
 RTI Surgical, Inc. 
 11621 Research Circle

 Alachua FL 32615 
 Dear Mr. Hutchison: 

Your Executive Transition Agreement with RTI Surgical, Inc., dated August 29, 2012, is about to expire. This letter will memorialize our
agreement that your Executive Transition Agreement is hereby extended through December 31, 2015, and its terms and conditions shall otherwise be unchanged. If the above reflects your understanding, please execute a copy of this letter in the
place indicated below and return it to me. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	RTI SURGICAL, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Thomas F. Rose

		 	Thomas F. Rose
		 	Corporate Secretary


  

	
	Agreed by:
	
	 /s/ Brian K. Hutchison

	Brian K. Hutchison
	President & Chief Executive Officer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior
 AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.
 ACTION: Availability of Revised Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Official Protraction Diagram.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that effective with this publication, the following NAD 27-based OCS Official Protraction Diagram last revised on the date indicated, is on file and available for information only, in the Gulf of Mexico OCS Regional Office, New Orleans, Louisiana. In accordance with Title 43, Code of Federal Regulations, this diagram is the basic record for the description of minerals and oil and gas lease sales in the geographic area it represents. Description
DateNG15-09, Amery Terrace
Oct. 25, 2000.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of Leasing Maps and Official Protraction Diagrams are $2.00 each. These may be purchased from the Public Information Unit, Information Services Section, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, Minerals Management Service, 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394, Telephone (504) 736-2519. Dated: November 2, 2000. Thomas A. Readinger, Acting Associate Director for Offshore Minerals Management.


[FR Doc. 00-28600  Filed 11-7-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-MR-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                   1000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>              Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                            3,412
<SECURITIES>                     20,382
<RECEIVABLES>                     8,109
<ALLOWANCES>                   (32,311)
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      0
<PP&E>                           24,036
<DEPRECIATION>                   10,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  396,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 0
<BONDS>                         364,994
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             5,960
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                         29,180
<OTHER-SE>                     (25,083)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    396,465
<SALES>                          28,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 64,300
<CGS>                            17,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    17,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 31,514
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 26,938
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               23,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (36,211)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (36,211)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                   (36,211)
<EPS-BASIC>                      (6.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (6.94)



</TABLE>
Page **1** of **2**

Date: September 17, 2012 MEMORANDUM TO: Air and Radiation Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2012

- 0542 SUBJECT: Technical Meeting with the Indonesian Ministry of Environment

On September 17, 2012, nine representatives of the Indonesian Ministry of Environment met with representatives of EP A’s Office of Air and Radiation, Office of International and Tribal Affairs , and Office of General Counsel to discuss EPA’s Notice of Data Availability on renewable fuels produced from palm oil. A complete list of attendees is below. Assistant Administrator McCarth y welcomed the Indonesian delegation and provided an overview of EPA’s work on palm oil, Executive Secretary Hermien Roosita explained the Ministry ’s role in regulating oil palm production, and Division Director Karl Simon stepped through a presentation detailing the Renewable Fuel Standard program and the palm oil analysis

**Delegation from Indonesia:** 1. Hermien Roosita, Executive Secretary for Ministry

of Environment (bio attached) 2. Najib Dahlan, Assistant t o the minister on law issues 3. Rasio Ridho Sani, Director for Planning and Internation al Cooperation 4. Diony sius Johny

P. Kusumo, Assistant Deputy for Env ironmental Data and Information 5. Mauly ani Jay adilaga, Coordinator for E nvironmental Index quality data 6. Ari Sug asri, Head of International law 7. Ibu Halimah, Head of Toxics and Hazardous Waste 8. Sulistyowati, assisstant deputy for Mitigation and Atmosphere 9. Damay anti Ratunanda, Head of Bilateral cooperation
**Representatives from EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation** Gina McCarth y Assistant Administrator Joel Beauvais Maurice LeF ranc Marta Montoro Karen Orehowsk y Karl Simon Director of OTAQ’s Transportation and Climate Division (TCD) Vince Camobreco OTAQ TCD Angela Dickens AAAS Science & Technology Policy Fellow, OTAQ TCD
**Representatives from EPA’s Office of International and Tribal Affairs** Mi chael Stahl Assistant Administrator Mark Kasman Rakhi Kasman Katherine Buckley Joe Ferrante Ted M a cDonald
**Representatives from EPA’s Office of General Counsel**Page **2** of **2**

Steve Wolfson
**Represen tatives from the US Embassy in Jakarta**  Benjamin Wohlauer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 223 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 223

   Expressing the sense of the Congress that any legislation that is 
enacted to provide for comprehensive national health care reform should 
    provide for coverage of syringes for individuals who have been 
 diagnosed with diabetes and who require the administration of insulin 
                              by syringe.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 1994

  Ms. Furse submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
referred jointly to the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the Congress that any legislation that is 
enacted to provide for comprehensive national health care reform should 
    provide for coverage of syringes for individuals who have been 
 diagnosed with diabetes and who require the administration of insulin 
                              by syringe.

Whereas more than 14,000,000 individuals in the United States have diabetes;
Whereas diabetes contributes to more than 160,000 deaths annually in the United 
        States;
Whereas diabetes costs the Nation approximately $92,000,000,000 annually in 
        direct and indirect medical costs;
Whereas diabetes disproportionately affects Hispanic, Native American, African-
        American, and other medically underserved populations;
Whereas approximately 10 percent of individuals with diabetes require the 
        injection of insulin to manage the disease;
Whereas research has proven that frequent administration of insulin prevents 
        certain complications of diabetes, such as blindness, kidney disease, 
        heart disease, stroke, and the need for amputation;
Whereas sterile syringes are necessary to safely administer insulin by 
        injection; and
Whereas most health care benefit plans currently provide coverage for sterile 
        syringes to administer insulin: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that any legislation that is 
enacted to provide for comprehensive national health care reform should 
provide for coverage of syringes for individuals in the United States 
who have been diagnosed with diabetes and who require the 
administration of insulin by syringe.

                                 <all>
```
Case 3:22-cv-00690-S-BK Document 14 Filed 09/26/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 995
#### L. H. LACY CO. v. FLOWERS et ux.

No. 4137.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

March 11, 1943.

Rehearing Denied March 24, 1943.

*791Touchstone, Wight, Gormley & Touchstone, of Dallas, for appellant.

Pipkin & Pipkin, of Beaumont, for ap-pellees.

COMBS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the 60th District Court of Jefferson County, overruling appellant’s plea of privilege. Ap-pellees have filed two motions, one being to affirm on certificate and subject thereto a motion to dismiss the appeal. Both motions are grounded upon the contention that the record was filed too late in this court.

The order appealed from was entered December 8, 1942. Notice of appeal was given and appeal bond filed on the same day the judgment was entered. The record was filed in this court January 21, 1943. Appellant made no motion in this court for an extension of the time for filing the record. Appellees contend that a judgment granting or overruling a plea of privilege is an interlocutory order and as a consequence that the appeal from such an order is governed by Rule No. 385, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires that the record shall be filed in the appellate court within 20 days after rendition of the order appealed from. Appellant contends that a judgment sustaining or overruling a plea of privilege is not an interlocutory order within the purview of Rule No. 385, but is in the nature of a final judgment on the question of venue and that an appeal therefrom is governed by Rule No. 386, which allows 60 days for filing the record.

We think appellant’s contention is not tenable. A judgment of the trial court sustaining or overruling of a plea of privilege is not a final judgment but is interlocutory only. Lowry et al. v. State, Comm. App., 258 S.W. 471. Appeals from such judgments are governed by Rule No. 385. We hold, therefore, that the transcript was filed in this court too late.

We find no rule providing for the affirmance of interlocutory judgments on certificate. We think the proper procedure in this case is to dismiss the appeal. The motion to affirm on certificate is overruled. Motion to dismiss is granted.

Appeal dismissed.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

CHARLES LEONHARDT HAUPT, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 17-3056 

(D.C. No. 2:15-CR-20019-JAR-1) 

(D. Kan.)

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

 

Before MORITZ, EBEL, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges. 

 

 The government has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to an appeal 

waiver included in defendant-appellant Charles Haupt’s plea agreement. Mr. Haupt, 

through counsel, “agrees that his appeal waiver is enforceable under . . . United 

States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc)” and “does not oppose the 

dismissal of this appeal.” Resp. to Mot. for Enforcement of Appeal Waiver at 1. 

 

 

 * This panel has determined that oral argument would not materially assist the 

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The 

case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment 

is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, 

and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent 

with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

May 26, 2017

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
- 2 - 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 

 Entered for the Court 

 Per Curiam
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6077

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TIMOTHY LEE FEWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-284-P, CA-96-444-P) Submitted: March 9, 1999 Decided: April 19, 1999 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Lee Fewell, Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Sullivan, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Fewell has waived appellate review of the denial of the related motions by failing to present argument in his informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). 2 PER CURIAM: Timothy Lee Fewell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider/reopen a prior action filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1996), and related motions. * We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. The district court properly construed Fewell’s motion to reconsider/reopen as a second or successive § 2255 motion. Before filing a second or successive motion in the district court, Fewell must obtain authorization from this court. See 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2244(b)(3)(A), 2255 (West Supp. 1998). Because Fewell has not obtained such authorization, the district court’s dismissal of his motion to reconsider/reopen was not in error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 21403.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 29, 1941.

R. W. Webb, of Snyder, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for the possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in dry area, punishment assessed at a fine of one hundred dollars.

No bills of exception are brought forward. The facts have been examined and are sufficient to support the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ANN L. MARTIN AND JAMES L. MARTIN,

Petitioners

v.

ADRIENNE L. BAILEY, DONALD A. BAILEY, SHERI D. COOVER, LAW OFFICES OF DONALD A. BAILEY, AND ESTATE OF LEAH L. PLACENIK,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 50 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of July, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.