alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-CV-995-S 

$31,480 IN U.S. CURRENCY 

ORDER 

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in 

this case. See ECF No. 13. No objections were filed. The Court has reviewed the Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the 

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. 

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff United States of America's Motion for Default 

Judgment and Final Judgment of Forfeiture [ECF No. 11]. 

SO ORDERED. 

SIGNED October 25, 2022. 11-v:�� UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cv-00995-S Document 14 Filed 10/25/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 65
**Exhibit 34.12**

**CURCIO**

**+COHEN**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Managing Member 

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC 

New York, NY 

We have examined management’s assertion,included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of 2015 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the“Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, excluding those criteria noted as notapplicable (N/A) within Exhibit B to Management’s Report. The transactions covered by this report are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust advisor or operating advisor for the asset backed securitiestransactions (the “Platform”) identified in Management’s Report. Reference Exhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by this examination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion based on our examination. 

Our examination wasconducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, including examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of a selected sample of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed thoseselected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria during the specified period. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. Our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests, that may have affected the Company’s servicing activities during the period covered bythis report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B toManagement’s Report with respect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A to Management’s Report as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, for the Platform, is fairly stated in all material aspects. 

/s/ Curcio & Cohen, CPA’S, P.C. 

New York, NY 

February 15, 2016 

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTSPC 7 PENN PLAZA, SUITE 1500 NEW YORK NY 10001 

TEL: 212 557-9800 FAX: 212 557 9819 WEBSITE: WWW.CWCCPAFIRM.COM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 2000 FORM 10-QSB OF CSB FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND IS QUILIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,444
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     15,798
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             216
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               216
<LOANS>                                         30,110
<ALLOWANCE>                                        220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,060
<DEPOSITS>                                      38,581
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                186
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  49,060
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,153
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  539
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,692
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 782
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 818
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              874
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       17
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   1
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    765
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    160
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         139
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       139
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   222
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       19
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  220
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               220
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

          31.1 THE RULE 15d-14(a)

I, George Springsteen certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Commonwealth Income &
Growth Fund II (the Registrant);

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;
     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and
5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

/s/  George S. Springsteen
--------------------------

George S. Springsteen
Chief Executive Officer
May 16, 2005
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2015-PC1 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 29, 2016

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

/s/ Jeffrey Coletta

Jeffrey Coletta

Assistant Secretary

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Case 4:22-cr-00123-P Document 39 Filed 02/28/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID 107
Case 4:22-cr-00123-P Document 39 Filed 02/28/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID 108
# C_2017283EN.01002301.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 7 June 2017 — Verein für lauteren Wettbewerb e.V. v Princesport GmbH

(Case C-339/17)

(2017/C 283/32)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Verein für lauteren Wettbewerb e.V.

Applicant:

Defendant: Princesport GmbH

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that it is mandatory to clarify that the product is a pure textile product exclusively composed of the same fibre? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that it is mandatory to clarify that the product is a pure textile product exclusively composed of the same fibre?

1

| 2. | Is use of one of the three terms mentioned in Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011, namely ‘100 %’, ‘pure’ or ‘all’, mandatory or is this merely an option, and not an obligation, for such products? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is use of one of the three terms mentioned in Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011, namely ‘100 %’, ‘pure’ or ‘all’, mandatory or is this merely an option, and not an obligation, for such products?

| 3. | Does the obligation under Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 to label a textile product or to mark it with the name and percentage by weight of all constituent fibres also apply to pure textile products coming under Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does the obligation under Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 to label a textile product or to mark it with the name and percentage by weight of all constituent fibres also apply to pure textile products coming under Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2011 on textile fibre names and related labelling and marking of the fibre composition of textile products and repealing Council Directive 73/44/EEC and Directives 96/73/EC and 2008/121/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 272, p. 1).

1

---
Kin. oi-fi'Qt&fa'Cfl* Ja\ty\C5 fau\ CC

"Appc lUl XN TWC TaAS COuRT VS. " ' :0Y 

### THC. 51ATC;iOrT£XA5 RS£@5^SB. S^PPULS RdJp^o^ ^OURTOFf}i«U ^pp^Lg OCT OS 2015 OF C0URT OF CRIMINALAPPEAL* !)U5PtM5lOMRulcA. ' OCT 0S -** <iU Abel Acosta, Cierk 

### PiUou^f IW^P)qfl(,r PrsOc Rcjpcdifullu M0\/C5 tt«J (LouA +ali/\a<4 5a5pQA5;oiA dt RuI<l3\ at" tl^6 Rul^ afAppd!^p^c£da^,W6^

&/^ <d6£S \ac\ U&VL dtC£55 [t> &topLj \MCxdAitAC . 

### 31. Pc4iti£)M£/* d#0 iaJ- Ufii/t fuuJi fo pay a dcidtj 5£vVtCC and L--»eu/<d 

### flop U;»v\ 0*6im. adi/ficACiiAA U.\5 r^Ul uaOIu/ia U;i p<4tlv#n fo<* ,'CU LxJOuid
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 18-0586

Filed December 18, 2019

STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

DMARITHE CULBREATH,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Joel W. Barrows, 

Judge.

Dmarithe Culbreath appeals the sentences imposed following his guilty 

pleas in two criminal cases and his stipulation to probation violations in two other 

criminal cases. AFFIRMED.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender (until withdrawal), and Bradley M. 

Bender, Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Linda J. Hines, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee.

Considered by Tabor, P.J., and Mullins and May, JJ.
2

MULLINS, Judge.

Dmarithe Culbreath appeals the sentences imposed following his guilty 

pleas in two criminal cases and his stipulation to probation violations in two other 

criminal cases. He contends the sentencing court’s consideration of the Iowa Risk 

Revised assessment (IRR) contained in the presentence-investigation report (PSI) 

amounted to an abuse of discretion or violated his due process rights. He also 

argues the district court’s consideration of the recommendation contained in the 

PSI was improper because the judicial district department of correctional services 

is not statutorily authorized to provide a sentencing recommendation. He 

alternatively argues his counsel rendered ineffective assistance in failing to raise 

such arguments below. 

We conclude the sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in considering 

the IRR on its face as contained in the PSI. See State v. Headley, 926 N.W.2d 

545, 551 (Iowa 2019). As to the due process claims, we find Culbreath failed to 

preserve error and the record is inadequate for us to consider the claims under an 

ineffective-assistance-of-counsel rubric on direct appeal; we therefore preserve 

the claims, which Culbreath may raise in a postconviction-relief action if he so 

chooses. See id. at 551–52. We find no abuse of discretion in the court’s 

consideration of the sentencing recommendation contained in the PSI. See id. at 

552. We affirm without further opinion pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 21.26(1)(c) 

and (e).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 163 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 163

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   restoring the right of Americans to pray in public institutions, 
   including public school graduation ceremonies and athletic events.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1993

    Mr. Hefner introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   restoring the right of Americans to pray in public institutions, 
   including public school graduation ceremonies and athletic events.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is hereby proposed as 
an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the 
Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to prohibit 
voluntary individual or group prayer in public schools or other public 
institutions, or to prohibit prayer at public school baccalaureate 
services, athletic events, or other extracurricular activities. No 
person shall be required by the United States or by any State to 
participate in prayer or to be present during any prayer. Neither the 
United States nor any State shall compose the words of any prayer to be 
said in public schools or other public institutions, or at events 
sponsored by public schools or other public institutions.''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 273 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 273

Expressing the sense of the Congress that any comprehensive health care 
 reform measure should ensure that extemporaneous compounding is made 
 available to provide allergen-free medications for persons who suffer 
        from severe food allergies or other medical conditions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 1994

 Mr. Barca of Wisconsin submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that any comprehensive health care 
 reform measure should ensure that extemporaneous compounding is made 
 available to provide allergen-free medications for persons who suffer 
        from severe food allergies or other medical conditions.

Whereas studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine indicate that 
        an estimated 8 percent of all children in the United States and as many 
        as 2 percent of all adults in the United States suffer from food 
        allergies;
Whereas the severity of allergic reactions associated with food allergies ranges 
        from minor skin rashes and low-grade fevers to respiratory failure, 
        brain damage, and death;
Whereas common allergens such as corn, peanuts, soybeans, gum, and dyes are 
        frequently used in most versions of pharmaceutical products in the 
        United States;
Whereas pharmaceutical products have yielded great benefits in the treatment and 
        prevention of illness and other medical conditions;
Whereas persons with severe food allergies are often unable to locate 
        prescription medication that does not contain ingredients to which they 
        are allergic;
Whereas pharmacists may use the process of extemporaneous compounding to custom 
        formulate medications for persons with specific medical needs, if the 
        pharmacists obtain the active ingredients for the medications from a 
        pharmaceutical company; and
Whereas persons who are allergic to ingredients in prescription medication often 
        find it difficult to locate a pharmacist to provide the service of 
        extemporaneous compounding: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that any comprehensive health care 
reform measure enacted by the Congress should include provisions to 
ensure that extemporaneous compounding is made available to provide 
allergen-free medications for persons who suffer from severe food 
allergies, or other medical conditions, that make them unable to 
utilize other, commercially available, medications.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      23,543,000
<SECURITIES>                                22,839,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,379,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,542,000
<INVENTORY>                                 10,012,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            71,626,000
<PP&E>                                      11,537,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,751,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              76,807,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,740,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  72,057,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                76,807,000
<SALES>                                     34,059,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,809,000
<CGS>                                       17,913,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,400,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,126,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,666,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   193,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,859,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,859,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.67)


</TABLE>