alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Flatwater Studios Release Agreement

Whereas, Flatwater Studios (the "Producer") is engaged in a project ___________________________ (the "Video"), 

and whereas, I, the undersigned, have agreed to appear in the Video, and whereas, I understand that my voice, name, 

and image will be recorded by various mechanical and electrical means of all descriptions (such recordings, any 

piece thereof, the contents therein and all reproductions thereof, along with the utilization of my name, shall be 

collectively referred to herein as the "Released Subject Matter").

Therefore, in exchange for $1.00, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged and whose sufficiency as consideration I 

affirm, I hereby freely and without restraint consent to and give unto the Producer and its agents or assigns or 

anyone authorized by the Producer, (collectively referred to herein as the "Releasees") the unrestrained right in 

perpetuity to own, utilize, or alter the Released Subject Matter, in any manner the Releasees may see fit and for any

purpose whatsoever, all of the foregoing to be without limitation of any kind. Without limiting the generality of the 

foregoing, I hereby authorize the Releasees and grant unto them the unrestrained rights to utilize the Released 

Subject Matter in connection with the Video's advertising, publicity, public displays, and exhibitions. I hereby

stipulate that the Released Subject Matter is the property of the Producer to do with, as it will.

I hereby waive to the fullest extent that I may lawfully do so, any causes of action in law or equity I may have or 

may hereafter acquire against the Releasees or any of them for libel, slander, invasion of privacy, copyright or 

trademark violation, right of publicity, or false light arising out of or in connection with the utilization by the 

Releasees or another of the Released Subject Matter.

It is my intention that the above-mentioned consideration represents the sole compensation that I am entitled to 

receive in connection with any and all usages of the Released Subject Matter. I expressly stipulate that the 

Releasees may utilize the Released Subject Matter or not as they choose in their sole discretion without affecting the 

validity of this Release. 

This Release shall be governed by (State) ___________________________ law.

I hereby certify that I am over the age of eighteen, and that I have read, understood, and agreed to the foregoing.

Print Name: _______________________________________________________ 

Signature: _________________________________________________________ 

Date: _____________________________________________________________

Address: __________________________________________________________ 

City, State and Zip: _________________________________________________

Phone No: _________________________________________________________
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Surge Global Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, E. Jaime Schloss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


March 31, 2005                      /s/ E. Jaime Schloss
                                    -----------------------
                                    E. Jaime Schloss
                                    Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6882

In Re: MARC PIERRE HALL,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-95-5)

Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 27, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marc Pierre Hall, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Marc Pierre Hall has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

from this court seeking to have this court order Respondent Judge

Payne to respond to a Bureau of Prisons (BOP) inquiry regarding

Hall’s judgment and conviction order and pre-sentence investigation

report. Hall has not proven, and the district court has no record,

that the BOP made such an inquiry. However, Hall’s motion filed

under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999) is currently pending

with the Respondent judge. That case has been proceeding in a

timely manner and does not require intervention by this court.

Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394,

402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no

other means by which the relief sought could be granted, see In re

Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a

substitute for appeal. See In re Catawba Indian Tribe, 973 F.2d

1133, 1135 (4th Cir. 1992). The party seeking mandamus relief

carries the heavy burden of showing that he has “no other adequate

means to attain the relief he desires” and that his entitlement to

such relief is “clear and indisputable.” Allied Chem. Corp. v.

Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Hall has not made such a

showing. Accordingly, we deny Hall’s motion to proceed in forma

pauperis and his petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-
3

quately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,301,032
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         524,684
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,088,413
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      14,746,390
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        14,659,633
<LOANS>                                    107,452,024
<ALLOWANCE>                                    718,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             130,858,818
<DEPOSITS>                                 108,325,092
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,457,641
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,200,856
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,875,229
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             130,858,818
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,539,678
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              724,493
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               123,830
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,388,001
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,682,609
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,698,628
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,689,373
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   15,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,152,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,059,655
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     694,655
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   694,655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.83
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,261,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               703,547
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              718,547
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           718,547
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

   The undersigned, Thomas C. Shields, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:  July 29, 2003
                                                     /s/ Thomas C. Shields
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Thomas C. Shields
                                                     Senior Vice President
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained by ANADIGICS, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 58

To direct the appropriate committees of the House of Representatives and

the Senate to report legislation by July 30, 1993, to expand the rescission

authority of the President.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1993

Mr. GUTIERREZ submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Rules

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To direct the appropriate committees of the House of Representatives and the Senate to report legislation by July

30, 1993, to expand the rescission authority of the President.

Whereas the fiscal well-being of the Nation requires a greater

awareness by Congress and the President of the need to

control unrestrained spending, reduce the public debt,

and control the deficit;

Whereas the Nation’s voters have expressed a desire for a

change in many areas of government;

Whereas the severity of the budget deficit crisis requires a

short-term modification of congressional budgetary procedures; and
2

•HCON 58 IH

Whereas the House of Representatives and the Senate must

act swiftly to alleviate this crisis: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Committee on Rules of the House

3 of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Ad4 ministration of the Senate are each authorized to report

5 legislation by July 30, 1993, to expand the rescission au6 thority of the President.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,742
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              26
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                31,260
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    320,591
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        616,621
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,622
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,021,599
<DEPOSITS>                                     884,191
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,026
<LONG-TERM>                                     45,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,021,599
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 23,627
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,975
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                35,602
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              20,431
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,551
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,051
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 159
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    453
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         299
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       299
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.37
<LOANS-NON>                                      6,960
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,448
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,786
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,271
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      976
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,496
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,496
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,967
        

</TABLE>
|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History:                                                  
|                                                               
|U.S. Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Pipeline (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                               
|                                                               
|U.S. Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Pipeline (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           | 2,688,746 | 2,806,628 | 2,839,948 | 2,807,765 | 2,897,306 | 2,831,347 | 2,755,068 | 2,788,424 | 2,744,471
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,798,616 | 2,740,783 | 2,744,244 | 2,763,263 | 2,761,777 | NA        | 2,772,843 | NA        | 2,730,665 | 2,778,245
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,983,432 | 2,868,977 | 2,808,435 | 2,751,105 | 2,782,798 | 2,696,129 | 2,739,862 | 2,732,862 | 2,685,468 | 2,680,538
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,812,523 | 2,902,596 | 3,090,539 | 3,190,223 | 3,441,661 | 3,659,583 | 3,723,771 | 4,008,179 | 4,241,922 | 4,436,144
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,993,373 | 4,343,370 | 4,516,480 | 4,528,246 |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Amended Annual Report of Entrust Financial Services, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2001 as
filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report). I, Scott J. Sax, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 USC § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Scott J. Sax
Scott J. Sax, Chief Executive Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------

Dated:
08/19/02
#### RICHARDSON v. STATE.

No. 23084.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 14, 1945.

Rehearing Denied April 25, 1945.

*817Quinton Wright, Marvin P. McCoy and Jerome Canessa, all of Houston, for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Cr. Dist. Atty., and E. T. Branch, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of Houston, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of the burglary of a private residence at night and was given six years in the penitentiary.

The record in this case is without bills of exception and there are no objections to the court’s charge. The proceedings appear to he regular.

A married daughter of the owner of the house was living in the home and during the night she had turned on a light in order to look after her baby which was requiring attention. A negro man opened the screen door, entering the room from the porch, and proceeded to take some valuables from her purse. She was awakened by the noise and he thereupon demanded money, which she said she did not have. He made other demands accompanied by threats to take her life. The mother, sleeping in the same room, was awakened and she engaged in conversation with appellant for a period of the ten minutes time during which the witness said she observed him in the room. The mother jumped out of the bed, ran to another room and called for her son who was occupying another apartment in the building. At this the man fled. Officers came and made an investigation. Some days thereafter the daughter recognized the appellant while he was working in a neighborhood grocery store. Her testimony on the subject of identity is positive and unequivocal.

Appellant introduced no evidence and we find in the record no fact or circumstance to deny the story told by the witness. The evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s finding and there is nothing further for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant, in his motion for a rehearing, reasserts that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction. This was the only question presented for review on the original submission of this case, and the same is thoroughly discussed in our original opinion.

In his motion he does not point out wherein the evidence fails to support the jury’s conclusion of his guilt.

Believing that the case was properly disposed of on the original submission, the motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | CMBS Department

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C22 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C22

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

March 1, 2016

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### BIRDETTE v. STATE.

No. 21545.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 21, 1941.

Williamson & Nordyke, of Stephenville, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*208BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted upon indictment charging three separate and distinct of■fenses and was assessed a fine of $25. This fine might have been assessed by a jury under either count of the indictment and their verdict fails to inform the court of the count under which they found him guilty. The amount of the penalty being applicable to more than' one, we are unable to determine from anything in the record which one they meant, and a fatal defect is thereby apparent. For this reason we do not consider the other questions presented in the appeal.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.