alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)Pursuant to section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Alliance One International, Inc., a Virginia corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Alliance One International, Inc. and will be retained by Alliance One International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.Dated:  February 4, 2011/s/ Mark W. Kehaya__________________________________________Mark W. KehayaChairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer/s/ Robert A. Sheets__________________________________________Robert A. SheetsExecutive Vice President - Chief Financial Officerand Chief Administrative Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         December 4, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 am to 10:30 am.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Holiday Inn, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Henry J. Haigler, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Rm. 6150, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301/443-7216.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: November 6, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-29133  Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### TORRES v. STATE.

No. 25833.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

April 16, 1952.

No attorney -on appeal, -for appellant. George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is. murder with a motor vehicle ; the punishment, five years.

*904
      *The record is before us*without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

The proceedings appear regular on their face; and nothing being presented for review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 161 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.161
                                       Agreed to October 7, 1993        
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on Thursday, October 7, 1993 or Friday, 
October 8, 1993, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand adjourned until noon on Tuesday, October 12, 1993, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of 
business on Thursday, October 7, 1993, pursuant to a motion made by the 
Majority Leader or his designee, in accordance with this resolution, it 
stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Wednesday, October 13, 1993, 
or at such time as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his 
designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second 
day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of 
this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Attest:







                                  Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:







                                                Secretary of the Senate.`
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

KIMBERLY TAYLOR, §

PLAINTIFF, §

 §

V. § CASE NO. 3:22-CV-01033-E-BK

 §

COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY §

ADMINISTRATION, §

DEFENDANT. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in 

this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, 

conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, 

Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Plaintiff

is awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $8,488.84 and costs of $402.00. The fee award shall

be made payable directly to Plaintiff but sent in care of her attorney. 

SO ORDERED this 2nd day of August, 2023. 

Case 3:22-cv-01033-E-BK Document 29 Filed 08/02/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 3586
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 245 (Tuesday, December 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79649-79650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32156]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public that a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Procedures 
Advisory Committee (ATPAC) will be held to review present air traffic 
control procedures and practices for standardization, revision, 
clarification, and upgrading of terminology and procedures.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 23, 2016 from 12:45 
p.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Wednesday, February 24, 2016 from 8:45 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at CGH Technologies, Inc., 600 
Maryland

[[Page 79650]]

Ave SW., Suite 800W, Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Ms. Heather Hemdal, ATPAC Executive 
Director, 600 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App.2), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the ATPAC to be held Tuesday, February 23, 
2016 from 12:45 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Wednesday, February 24, 2016 
from 8:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    The agenda for this meeting will cover a continuation of the 
ATPAC's review of present air traffic control procedures and practices 
for standardization, revision, clarification, and upgrading of 
terminology and procedures. It will also include:
    1. Call for Safety Items
    2. Approval of minutes of the previous meeting
    3. Introduction of New Areas of Concern or Miscellaneous items
    4. Items of Interest
    5. Status updates to existing Areas of Concern
    6. Discussion and agreement of location and dates for subsequent 
meetings.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
available. With the approval of the Chairperson, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons desiring to attend 
and persons desiring to present oral statements should notify Ms. 
Heather Hemdal no later than February 16, 2016. Any member of the 
public may present a written statement to the ATPAC at any time at the 
address given above.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 16, 2015.
Heather Hemdal,
Executive Director, Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2015-32156 Filed 12-21-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

 

GINGER L. EDWARDS, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00429-O-BP

 § 

CITY OF FORT WORTH, et al., §

§ 

Defendants. §

 §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for 

review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 7, 10) and 

DISMISSES Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED on this 19th day of December, 2022. 

 

Case 4:22-cv-00429-O Document 24 Filed 12/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 110
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00028-Z-BR

§

KEISHA MARIE TELLES (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

KEISHA MARIE TELLES (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), 

has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 2 of the Indictment. After 

cautioning and examining KEISHA MARIE TELLES (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, 

I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that KEISHA MARIE TELLES (1) be adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C) 

- DISTRIBUTION AND POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE METHAMPHETAMINE and have sentence 

imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: May 13, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00028-Z-BR Document 97 Filed 05/13/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 216
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00041-Z-BR-1

§

MARIO ALBERTO MARQUEZ-MARQUEZ §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

MARIO ALBERTO MARQUEZ-MARQUEZ, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 

(5th Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the 

Indictment. After cautioning and examining MARIO ALBERTO MARQUEZ-MARQUEZ under oath concerning each of 

the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense 

charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore 

recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that MARIO ALBERTO MARQUEZ-MARQUEZ be adjudged guilty 

of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a); and 6 U.S.C. §§ 202(3), 202(4), and 557 - ILLEGAL RE-ENTRY AFTER DEPORTATION and

have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: June 17, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00041-Z-BR Document 28 Filed 06/17/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 52
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
ATG Inc. on Form S-8 (file No. 333-72349 and File No. 333-89115) of our reports
dated March 28, 2000, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
and financial statement schedule of ATG Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and 1998
and for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 which reports are
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


San Jose, California
April 17, 2000

                                       64
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 26

Expressing the sense of Congress in support of the United States military

forces in Somalia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1993

Mr. SOLOMON (for himself and Mr. DREIER) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress in support of the United

States military forces in Somalia.

Whereas, since 1991 over three hundred thousand Somalis,

including one fourth of the children under the age of five,

died due to civil strife, disease, and famine;

Whereas, prior to United Nations authorized operations in

Somalia, at least one-half of Somalia’s population of

eight million people, were considered at risk of starvation;

Whereas, in December 1992 the United Nations Security

Council unanimously approved the use of all necessary

force to secure relief efforts in Somalia;

Whereas, the number of deaths from starvation in Somalia

has declined significantly since the arrival of United

States led coalition forces; and
2

HCON 26 IH

Whereas, the United States has contributed immeasurably to

Operation Restore Hope, including the deployment of

over twenty thousand military troops and the loss of

American lives: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the United States Congress commends

3 United States military forces for successfully establishing

4 a secure environment for the humanitarian relief oper5 ations in Somalia.

Æ
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 60683 Summary Calendar

KARSON C. KAEBEL,
Petitioner

- Appellant

v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court TC No. 916

- 18

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Karson Kaebel appeals an order of the Tax Court dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his petition for review regarding his unpaid tax liabilities

. Kaebel argues that the Internal Revenue Service (“ IRS ”) is attempting to levy against him without iss uing the required notice

. See 26 U.S.C. § 6330

.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 30, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-60683 Document: 00514976590 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2019No. 18

- 60683

2 The jurisdiction of the Tax Court is a question of law that we review de

novo
. Terrell v. Comm’r , 625 F.3d 254, 259 (5th Cir. 2010) (citing Ferguson v. Comm’r , 568 F.3d 498, 502 (5th Cir. 2009)). The Tax Cour t has jurisdiction over a petition only if the taxpayer file s the petition within 90 days after the notice of deficiency is mailed. 26 U.S.C. § 6213 (a) ; Ward v. Comm’r , 907 F.2d 517, 52 1 (5th Cir. 1990)

. “[W] hether the IRS properly sent notice to the taxpayer[]

. . . thereby starting the ninety

- day response period, is a question of fact that we review for clear error.” Terrell , 625 F.3d at 259 (citing Ward , 907 F.2d at 521). The Tax Code d oes not require actual receipt of the notice of deficiency, rath er t he notice “shall be sufficient” if mailed to the taxpayer ’ s last known address. 26 U.S.C. § 6212(b)(1); Jones v. United States , 889 F.2d 1448, 1450 (5th Cir. 1989). Kaebel ’s petition to the Tax Court claimed that he never received a notice of deficienc y for the years 200 5

– 2010. The IRS moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction , providing copies of the notices of deficiency and United States Postal Form s 3877 showing that the notices were sent by certified mail to Kaebel’s last known address. The record reflects that a ll six of the contested notices were mailed from December 13, 2010 to June 3, 2013. Accordingly, the 90

- day deadline to file a petition expired , at the latest , on September 3, 2013. Kaebel did not file his petition until January 17, 2018. We find no clear error in the Tax Court’s determination that the notices of deficiency were properly mailed and that Kaebel’s petition was filed long after the deadline expired. See,
e.g. , Haddix v. Comm’r , 665 F. App’x 378, 381

- 82 (5th Cir. 2016) ( “[T axpaye rs ], as the ones invoking the Tax Court’s jurisdiction , [have] the burden of proving the Tax Court’s jurisdictional prere quisites by a preponderance of the evidence[.]” ). AFFIRM ED

. Case: 18-60683 Document: 00514976590 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/30/2019