alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeneLink, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John R. DePhillipo,
as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods shown in such report.


Date: November 13, 2003              By: /s/ John R. DePhillipo
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                             John R. DePhillipo, Chief Executive
                                             Officer and President
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 69039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29144]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, November 3, 2000, 12:30 pm to 
November 3, 2000, 2:00 pm, NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which 
was published in the Federal Register on October 31, 2000, 65 FR 64977-
64979.
    The meeting will be held November 8, 2000, 4:00 pm to 5:30 pm. The 
location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: November 6, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-29144 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

The Honorable Philip M. Pro, District Judge for the U.S. District ***

Court for Nevada, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JESUS RODRIGUEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10291

D.C. No. 2:04-cr-00387-MCE-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 28, 2011** 

San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and PRO, District Judge.*** 

The parties agree this matter should be remanded to the Eastern District of

California for consideration of a new trial motion based on newly discovered

FILED

DEC 07 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-2-

evidence prior to this Court resolving the issues in this appeal. The parties dispute

only whether the Court should reassign this matter on remand. The Court denies

the request to reassign, as there is no evidence of personal bias and no unusual

circumstances exist to support reassignment. McSherry v. City of Long Beach, 423

F.3d 1015, 1023 (9th Cir. 2005); Hernandez v. City of El Monte, 138 F.3d 393, 402

(9th Cir. 1998). All issues raised in Appellant’s Opening Brief in this appeal are

preserved for later appeal in the event the district court denies the motion for new

trial.

REMANDED.
1 

EXHIBIT 2 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FT. WORTH DIVISION 

ROBERT (BOB) ROSS 

Plaintiff, Counterclaim-Defendant 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ Case No. 4:22-CV-00343 

V. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL 

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, MCGAUGHEY, 

REBER AND ASSOCIATES, INC., JULIE 

HEDRICK, ERIK HARRIS, IMA 

FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., LARRY 

SALAS, JOSH BLACK, 

Defendants, Counterclaim Plaintiffs. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

SECOND AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS 

 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.7.1 and LR 3.1(c), L.R 3.2(e), LR 7.4, LR 81.1(a)(4)(D) and 

LR 81.2, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Robert “Bob” Ross provides the following information: 

For a nongovernmental corporate party, the name(s) of its parent corporation and any 

publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its stock (if none, state “None”): 

 None. 

A complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporation , 

guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporation or other legal entities that 

are financially interested in the outcome of this case: 

1. Association of Professional Flight Attendant (“APFA”); 

2. Julie Hedrick, National President of APFA; 

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 85-2 Filed 04/08/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID 1873
2 

EXHIBIT 2 

3. Erik Harris, National Treasurer of APFA; 

4. Larry Salas, National Vice-President of APFA; 

5. Josh Black, National Secretary of APFA; 

6. McGaughey Reber and Associates, Inc d/b/a Diversified Credit Systems; 

7. Members of, and individuals represented by the APFA; 

8. IMA Finance Group, Inc.; and 

9. Robert “Bob” Ross, former National President of APFA (“Plaintiff 

Counterclaim Defendant”). 

Date: April 7, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

K.D. PHILLIPS LAW FIRM, PLLC 

By: /s/ Kerri Phillips 

Kerri Phillips 

Texas Bar No. 24065906 

Phone: (972) 327-5800 

Email: kerri@KDphillipslaw.com

6010 W. Spring Creek Parkway 

Plano, Texas 75024 

Fax: (940) 400-0089 

For Service of Filings: 

notice@KDphillipslaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 85-2 Filed 04/08/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID 1874
3 

EXHIBIT 2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I certify that on this 7th day of April, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document 

was served on the below listed counsels of record for Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiffs by 

means permitted by Rule 5(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“F.R.C.P.”). 

 William Osborne 

 Sanford Denison 

 Michael Rake 

 /s/ Kerri Phillips 

Kerri Phillips 

 

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 85-2 Filed 04/08/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID 1875
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-3577-000]

Take notice that on November 2, 2000, the New England Power Pool (NEPOOL) Participants Committee submitted in the above-captioned docket supplemental information relating to its August 31, 2000 filing of the Sixty-Fourth Agreement Amending New England Power Pool Agreement (the Sixty-Fourth Agreement), which proposed the elimination of In Service. This supplemental information clarifies the purpose and intended effect on the Sixty-Fourth Agreement.

The NEPOOL Participants Committee has requested an effective date of December 1, 2000.

The NEPOOL Participants Committee states that copies of these materials were sent to all persons identified on the service list in the above-captioned docket, the NEPOOL Participants, the Non-Participant Transmission Customers and the six New England state governors and regulatory commissions.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's rules of practice and procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before November 14, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-28922  Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Order entered July 7 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 21 - 00255 - CV IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF JOYCE MARGOL, AN ALLEGED

INCAPACITATED PERSON On Appeal from the Proba te Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR - 20 - 02238 - 2

O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s unopposed motion for a seven

- day extension of time to file his brief

. It appears the briefing deadline was triggered before a complete appellat e record was filed , and a supplemental reporter’s record of a hearing held June 7, 2021 remains to be filed

. Because the deadline for filing appellant’s brief does not begin to run until the record is complete, w e GRANT the motion to the extent we RESET t he deadline for ap pellant’s brief and ORDER Lis a beth Kellet t , Official Court Reporter for Probate Court No. 2, to file the supplemental reporter’s record of the June 7 th hearing no later than July 26, 2021.We further ORDER appellant’s brief be filed with in thirty days of the filing of the

supplemental record. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Kellet t and the parties.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

____________
No. 23

- 60377 Summary Calendar

____________ Fasken Land and Minerals, Limited; Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners,

Petitioners ,

versus
Nuclear Regulatory Commission; United States of America,
Respondents

.

______________________________ Appeal from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Agency No. 72

- 1051

______________________________ Before Jones , Elrod , and Wilson , Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *

In September 2021 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a license to Interim Storage Partners, LLC, to establish a facility to store nuclear wa ste temporarily in Andrews County, Texas. See Texas v. Nuclear Regul. Comm’n , 78 F.4th 827, 833

– 35 (5th Ci r. 2023) [hereinafter Texas v. NRC

] , reh’g en banc denied , 2024 WL 1108700 (5th Cir. Mar. 14,

__________ ___________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir

. R

. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 27, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-60377 Document: 95-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/27/2024No. 23

- 60377

2 2024)

. Texas, Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd., (Fasken), and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners (PBLRO) petitioned this court to set aside that license. Id. a t 834

– 35. In that appeal, a panel of this court first held that Fasken and PBLRO had standing under the Constitution and the Hobbs Act to challenge the NRC’s actions. Id. at 835

– 40. It then held that the NRC lacked statutory authority to issue the licen se. Id. at 840

– 44. Accordingly, this court granted the petitions for review and vacated the license. Id. at 844. The NRC filed a petition for rehearing en banc on October 24, 2023 , which this court denied on March 14, 2024

. See Texas v. Nuclear Regul. Comm’n , No. 21

- 60743,

--- F.4th

---- , 2024 WL 1108700 (5th Cir. Mar. 14, 2024 ). Shortly before the panel issued its opinion in Texas v. NRC , Fasken and PBLRO filed the petition for review at issue in this case. They challenge a di fferent license issued by the NRC in May 2023 to Holtec International to establish a facility to store nuclear waste in Lea County, New Mexico. The parties , correctly, agree that Texas v. NRC involved a “materially identical license in a materially identi cal procedural posture” and that “absent the [c]ourt granting rehearing en banc in Texas [ v. NRC ]

. . . , the panel’s consideration of this case will be controlled by [ Texas v. NRC ].” Because this court’s holding in Texas v. NR C dictates the outcome here, we GRANT Fasken’s and PBLRO’s petition for review and VACATE the Holtec license

. The NRC’s motion to transfer the petition for review to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is DENIED AS MOOT. Case: 23-60377 Document: 95-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/27/2024
#### Feed Bram, Respondent, *v.*Oppenheimer & Co., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

October 31, 1957.

*945
      *Alfred Berman*and *Leon H. Tykulsker*for appellant.

*Daniel D. Trause, Samuel J. Kisseloff*and *Janet Perlman*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff agreed to be bound by the constitution and rules of the New York Stock Exchange and to submit himself to its jurisdiction. Beading the constitution and the rules together, it clearly appears that when plaintiff ceased to be a registered employee of defendant, which followed upon his voluntary resignation, he lost his right to collect commissions on sales he made during his employment, but payment on which was received by the defendant subsequent to his resignation.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted dismissing the complaint.

Hofstadter, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          45,700
<SECURITIES>                                    14,653
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,192
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,335
<INVENTORY>                                      1,494
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,852
<PP&E>                                          95,333
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,835
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 189,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,379
<BONDS>                                         28,397
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           401
<OTHER-SE>                                     105,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   189,092
<SALES>                                         61,547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,547
<CGS>                                           50,169
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,654
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (38,419)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       119
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (38,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (38,300)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.98)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT OF FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                          44,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  267,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                    35,000
<INVENTORY>                                    659,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               992,700
<PP&E>                                       1,204,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 797,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,155,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          865,200
<BONDS>                                        593,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       257,500
<OTHER-SE>                                   (351,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,155,400
<SALES>                                      1,835,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,835,100
<CGS>                                        1,700,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,700,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                61,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              94,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (451,200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (491,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (85,100)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (576,200)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (8.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.50)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Data Sales Co.
3450 West Burnsville Parkway
Burnsville, MN 55337
952-890-8838
fax:  952-890-8917

July 6, 2000                                    Via Fax-1 Page
                                                612-858-8881

Ms. Andrea Spears
Adaytum Software Inc.
2051 Killebrew Drive
Suite 400
Bloomington, MN 55425

Dear Andrea,

Data Sales Co., Inc. (DSC) is pleased to present ate additional lease, line
proposal to Adaytum Software Inc. (ASI). This proposal should be considered
confidential and may only be shared among employees, investors and/or
consultants.

<TABLE>
<S>                       <C>
Equipment:                Tier One Technology Hardware (Dell, Cisco, IBM, etc.)
Lease Line:               $1,000,000.00
Downpayment:              10% of hardware plus all soft costs (freight, software, etc.)
Term:                     30 months
LRF:                      .03994 (floating 5 pts over prime at funding)
End of Term:              Fair market Value not to exceed 20% of equipment cost provided no
                          default has occurred.
Warrants:                 5% of lease line amount based on per unit price of $8.55
Terms and Conditions:     a.  Monthly lease payments made by ACH deposit
                          b. DSC reserves the right to review this lease line on a monthly basis
                          c. Equipment to be leased in the United States of America only
</TABLE>

As your acceptance of this proposal please have the Agreed to line signed below
and fax back to my attention at 952-890-8917.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide Adaytum Software Inc. with its leasing
requirements.

Sincerely,                                  AGREED TO BY:

                                            Name:  /s/ Michael Mehr
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Michael Mehr

/s/ Daniel Gannon
Daniel Gannon                               Title:  VP-Finance & Adm.
                                                  -----------------------------

                                            Date:  July 26, 2000
                                                 ------------------------------
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 11.2
                                     PSINet Inc.
                                   and Subsidiaries
                                           
                    Calculation of Loss per Share  (Unaudited) (1)
                                           
                                              
<TABLE>
                                                                                     Six Months Ended
<S>                                                                                    June 30, 1997
                                                                                     ----------------
Weighted average shares outstanding:                                                   <C>
Common stock:
      Shares outstanding at beginning of period.....................................       40,113,234
      Weighted average shares issued during the six months ended June 30, 1997 
      (282,539 shares)..............................................................          78,508
                                                                                          ------------
                                           
                                                                                          40,191,742
                                                                                          ------------
                                                                                          ------------

Net loss ...........................................................................    $ (20,592,000)
                                                                                        --------------
                                                                                        --------------
Loss per share (unaudited)..........................................................    $       (0.51)
                                                                                        --------------
                                                                                        --------------
</TABLE>

(1) For a discussion of loss per share, see Note 2 of the Notes to the 
    Consolidated Financial Statements.