alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PROMISSORY NOTE-FIXED INTEREST
                            WITH INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS


$100,000.00                                            7% Interest Per Annum
                                                            January 31, 1994


     In installments, as set forth, for value received, the undersigned,
Weststar Environmental, Inc. and B & B Plumbing and Septic Service, Inc.
promises to pay to William R. Ferguson, Gloria Ferguson and Alan R. Ferguson to
order at P.O. Box 686 Maggie Valley, North Carolina, 28751, the sum of One
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) together with interest from the date
above on the unpaid principal balance due at a rate of Seven percent (7%) per
annum. Payments shall be payable monthly in installments of One Thousand Dollars
($1,000.00) beginning on February 28, 1994 and on the first day of each month
thereafter and the final payment of One Thousand Five Hundred Fifteen Dollars
and Thirty Eight Cents ($1,515.38.

     Should interest not be paid when due it shall thereafter bear interest at
the same rate as the principal. All payments shall be payable in lawful currency
of the United States of America. The undersigned agrees to pay all costs of
collection including reasonable attorney's fees.


WESTSTAR ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. AND B & B PLUMBING & SEPTIC SERVICE, INC.



BY: /s/  MICHAEL E. RICKS
    ----------------------------
         Michael E. Ricks
         President
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the Operating Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward J. Fritsch, President and Chief Executive Officer of Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the
Operating Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ EDWARD J. FRITSCH                                       
|Edward J. Fritsch                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
|October 6, 2006                                             
|                                                            



47
Opinion issued April 18, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00948-CV

———————————

MEMORIAL HERMANN HOSPITAL SYSTEM, Appellant

V.

GLORIA RAMOS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2011-35745

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Memorial Hermann Hospital System (“MHHS”), has filed a

motion to dismiss its appeal, indicating that the parties have settled the underlying 

dispute, and appellee, Gloria Ramos, agrees to the dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P.
2

10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1). Appellant further states that both parties have agreed to 

bear their own attorney’s fees and costs of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).

No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c).

Accordingly, we grant MHHS’s motion and dismiss the appeal, with costs 

taxed against the party who incurred the same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (d).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 88

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 9 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing and commending American airmen held as prisoners of war at the Buchenwald concentration camp during World War II for their service, bravery, and fortitude.

Whereas, during World War II, 173 Allied airmen were captured by the enemy and held as prisoners of war at the

Buchenwald concentration camp in Weimar, Germany;

Whereas the captured airmen included 81 Americans, 27

Canadians, and 65 Britons, Australians, and New

Zealanders;

Whereas the facts and circumstances of their confinement are

amply documented in the official records maintained by

the National Archives and Records Administration;
2

HCON 88 RFS

Whereas a report from the International Red Cross concerning Stalag Luft III in Sagan, Germany, mentioned 6

American airmen held at Buchenwald, including 1 whose

name does not appear on the lists maintained by the

National Archives;

Whereas, since the liberation of Buchenwald in 1945, numerous personal memoirs, scholarly books, and articles have

been published describing the conditions at the concentration camp;

Whereas this extensive documentation records the extraordinarily inhuman treatment, deprivations, and personal

suffering inflicted on prisoners of war and other inmates

at Buchenwald; and

Whereas Allied Governments and veterans organizations outside the United States have granted special recognition to

their citizens and members who were held as prisoners of

war in World War II concentration camps: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes and commends the valiant Amer4 ican airmen held as prisoners of war at the Buchen5 wald concentration camp during World War II for

6 their faithful service, personal bravery, and excep7 tional fortitude; and
3

HCON 88 RFS

1 (2) requests that the President issue a procla2 mation recognizing and commending the service,

3 bravery, and fortitude of the American airmen.

Passed the House of Representatives November 8,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
Wheeling-Pittsburgh  Corporation  Consolidated  Financial Statements as of March
31,  1999 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                                   JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                     MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                                     0
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         61,176
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           1,271
<INVENTORY>                                                          249,188
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     316,201
<PP&E>                                                             1,101,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       457,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     1,255,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                289,192
<BONDS>                                                              349,745
<COMMON>                                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                                           151,015
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       1,255,496
<SALES>                                                              250,048
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     250,048
<CGS>                                                                238,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        274,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     9,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (33,499)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        (13,232)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 (20,267)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         (20,267)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              0
        

</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-15-00056-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE ANDREW VANBLARCUM AND JAMES VANBLARCUM

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Per Curiam Order

Relators, Andrew VanBlarcum and James VanBlarcum, filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus and motion for emergency stay in the above cause on February 4, 2015. 

Through this original proceeding, relators contend that the trial court erred in denying their 

plea in abatement based on dominant jurisdiction. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for emergency stay, 

is of the opinion that said motion should be granted. The motion for emergency stay is 

hereby GRANTED, and the trial court proceedings are ordered STAYED pending further 

order of this Court, or until the case is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) 
2

(“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case 

is finally decided.”). 

The Court requests that the real party in interest, Nexus Integrity Management, 

LLC, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a 

response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from 

the date of this order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 5th

day of February, 2015.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 23**  **04**

HESMAN TALL, a/k/a Hunter , Plaintiff

- Appell ant ,

v.
MV TRANSPORTATION , Defendant

- Appell ee .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Roger W. Titus , District Judge. ( 8 :1 2

- cv - 0 0417

- RWT )

Submitted : February 26 , 201 3 Decided: February 28, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN , and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Hesman Tall , Appellant Pro Se. Eric J. Janson , SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Washington, DC , for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Hesman Tall appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his civil action alleging wrongful termination. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Tall leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tall v. MV
Transp. , No. 8:12

- cv - 00417

- RWT (D. Md. Sept. 27, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10679

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BENNIE EARL HUDSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:95-CV-289-A

- - - - - - - - - -

February 7, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Bennie Earl Hudson appeals from the district court's

order denying his motion to vacate his sentence, filed pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2255. He argues that: he received ineffective

assistance of counsel; his conviction on two counts of being a

felon in possession of a firearm, under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and

924(e), violated the Double Jeopardy Clause; the sentencing court's

reliance on allegedly uncounseled prior convictions violated his

due process rights; the court's reliance on convictions that predated § 924(e)'s enactment violated the Ex Post Facto Clause; the
No. 95-10679

-2-

court denied him allocution in violation of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32;

and the term "burglary" in § 924(e) is unconstitutionally "void for

vagueness." We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and perceive no reversible error. Although the district

court failed to address Hudson's ex post facto claim, this court

has reviewed and rejected an identical claim in a previous case.

See United States v. Leonard, 868 F.2d 1393, 1399 (5th Cir. 1989),

cert. denied, 496 U.S. 904 (1990). Otherwise, we affirm for

essentially the reasons given by the district court. United States

v. Hudson, No. 4:95-CV-289-A (N.D. Tex. July 16, 1995).

Hudson's motion to supplement the record on appeal is DENIED.

AFFIRMED.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 81

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 1993 Special Olympics Torch Relay

to be run through the Capitol Grounds.
★

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 81

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL

4 OLYMPICS TORCH RELAY THROUGH CAPITOL

5 GROUNDS.

6 On May 27, 1993, or on such other date as the

7 Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Presi8 dent pro tempore of the Senate may designate jointly, the

9 1993 Special Olympics Torch Relay may be run through

10 the Capitol Grounds, as part of the journey of the Special

11 Olympics torch to the District of Columbia Special Olym12 pics summer games at Gallaudet University in the District

13 of Columbia.
2

•HCON 81 EH1S

1 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

2 The Capitol Police Board shall take such action as

3 may be necessary to carry out section 1.

4 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA5 TIONS.

6 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions

7 for physical preparations for the event authorized by

8 section 1.

Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|U.S. Refinery Fuel Ethanol (FETH) Working Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|U.S. Refinery Fuel Ethanol (FETH) Working Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 410    | 283    | NA     | 225    | NA     | 241   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 221    | 213    | 218    | 233    | 264    | 231    | 468    | 578    | 589    | 683   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 607    | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 29, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00390

- CV

Ju an ROBLES

, Appellant

v.

Maria Milagros ROBLES

, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10

- 2084

- CV

Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant's motion to extend deadline to submit reporter's record is hereby MOOT.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of S eptember, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

 DALLAS DIVISION 

NATHAN JOVON SCOTT, ) 

 #01873387, ) 

 Petitioner, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) No. 3:22-CV-1163-G (BH) 

 ) 

MICHAEL BRITT, ) 

 Respondent. ) Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge1

 

RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REQUEST TO PROCEED 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL 

 Before the Court is the petitioner’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on appeal, 

received on July 26, 2022 (doc. 9). 

 (X) The request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be DENIED 

because the Court should certify under Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(a)(3) that the appeal is not taken in good faith, and that it presents no legal 

points of arguable merit and is therefore frivolous for the reasons set forth in the 

findings, conclusions, and recommendation filed in this case on June 16, 2022 (doc. 

5). The request should also be denied because the petitioner has not established that 

he is a pauper under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), which provides that a prisoner seeking to 

appeal a judgment in a civil action “shall submit a certified copy of the trust fund 

account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period 

immediately preceding the filing of the . . . notice of appeal, obtained from the 

appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner is or was confined.” The 

petitioner has provided no such statement or institutional equivalent. 

 

If the Court denies the request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, the 

petitioner may challenge the denial by filing a separate motion to proceed in 

forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for 

the Fifth Circuit, within thirty days after service of the notice required by Fed. 

R. App. P. 24(a)(4). See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5).

 

1 By Amended Miscellaneous Order No. 6 (adopted by Special order No. 2-59 on May 5, 2005), requests to proceed 

in forma pauperis on appeal are automatically referred. 

Case 3:22-cv-01163-G-BH Document 11 Filed 11/02/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 45
 SIGNED this 2nd day of November, 2022. 

Case 3:22-cv-01163-G-BH Document 11 Filed 11/02/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 46
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2015-CCRE23 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-CCRE23 Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"): (a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and (b)  To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  February 29, 2016  /s/ Brian SmithBRIAN SMITHVice President /s/ Jeffrey ColettaJeffrey ColettaAssistant Secretary  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.