alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12(a)(1)  CERTIFICATION  I, Roberto González Barrera, certify that:  1.  I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Gruma, S.A. de C.V.;  2. 
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. 
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The
companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the company and have:  a. 
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. 
evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. 
disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The
companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys
auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  a.  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and  b.  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial
reporting.   /s/ Roberto
  González BarreraName:
  Roberto
  González BarreraTitle:
  Chief Executive Officer   Date: June 30, 2005  1
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 4

Expressing the sense of the Congress that federally funded school lunches

should provide optional meatless meals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. JACOBS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Education and Labor

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that federally funded

school lunches should provide optional meatless meals.

Whereas conscientious objection has long been recognized as

a valid reason for exemption from induction into the

Armed Forces of the United States;

Whereas an increasing number of school youths are conscientiously committed to compassionate lifestyles which include rejection of meat diets; and

Whereas federally funded school lunch programs seldom provide non-meat meals with due regard for other reliable

sources of necessary amino acids: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that

3 federally funded school lunch programs should provide nu-
2

HCON 4 IH

1 tritious non-meat meals for students who conscientiously

2 believe such meals to be best for themselves.

3 Æ
#### BRALY v. STATE.

No. 21460.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 29, 1941.

John C. Henderson, of Angleton, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Brazoria County of forgery, and his punishment was assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

Since perfecting his appeal, the appellant has filed a written motion, duly verified, requesting the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
# Official Journal L 19/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.019.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 19 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5622 January 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.019.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 19

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5622 January 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2013/21/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 18 December 2012 on equivalences between categories of driving licences
  (notified under document C(2012) 9358)

   (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2013/21/EU

*

Commission Decision of 18 December 2012 on equivalences between categories of driving licences
  (notified under document C(2012) 9358)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2012) 9358)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### BLANTON v. STATE.

No. 22465.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 28, 1943.

Jules F. Mayer, of Dallas, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for robbery, punishment assessed being ten years in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are found in the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Millard TATUM et al. v. STATE.

No. 23149.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 6, 1945.

Percy Foreman, of Houston, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of the County Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County in a bond forfeiture case.

The record in this case is in the same condition as the one in Cause No. 23147, Millard Tatum et al. v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 187 S.W.2d 989, this day decided. The State’s Attorney has filed a like motion in this case as in Cause No. 23147, and for the reasons therein stated, the motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,294<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,190
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,716
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,831
<PP&E>                                          60,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,950
<BONDS>                                         81,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,807
<OTHER-SE>                                      (9,990)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,482
<SALES>                                         36,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,415
<CGS>                                           34,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   713
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,135)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,220)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,915)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,915)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>OF THIS AMOUNT, 6,662 WAS RESTRICTED CASH
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 68986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2814-002]


Commonwealth Edison Company, Notice of Filing

November 7, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 25, 2000, Commonwealth Edison Company 
(ComEd), tendered for filing an executed Dynamic Scheduling Agreement 
(DSA) with Commonwealth Edison Company in its Wholesale Merchant 
Function (WEG).
    ComEd requests the same effective date of January 1, 2000 for the 
DSA that ComEd requested and was granted in docket No. ER00-940-000, in 
which ComEd submitted an unexecuted DSA between ComEd and WEG.
    ComEd has served a copy of this filing on WEG and on the parties 
listed on the official service list in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before November 15, 2000. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically 
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-29174 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet,  Statement  of  Operations,  Statements  of Cash Flows and Notes  thereto
incorporated  in this Form 10-QSB and is  qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              jun-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         366,531
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,808,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,072,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         33,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,281,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,030,245
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       503,652
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,747,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,281,214
<SALES>                                        2,627,918
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,627,918
<CGS>                                          1,888,570
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               583,807
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                154,530
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            154,530
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   154,530
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 127979 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, VILLAGE OF NEWBERRY, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 127979 COA: 252052 Luce CC: 99-002860-CZ MCMILLAN TOWNSHIP and PENTLAND TOWNSHIP, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
RAYMOND

February 24, 2010

":t l

12.\ Recycle'd "'" Paper . , ',,)**':;bOt)GL~s'A.::aEi~s** 

## .,•.. :,.:: State Representative' ;: I 22nd District SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES: E. BASHAM THE SENATE NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL 8TH DISTRICT Atl'AIRS, MINORITY VICE CHAIR P,O, BOX 30036 STATE OF MICHIGAN TRANSPORTATION, MINORITY VICE CHAIR LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909·7536 LOCAL, URBAN AND STATE AFFAIRS PHONE: (517) 373·7800 SENIOR CITIZENS AND VETERANS AFFAIRS

FAX: (517) 373·9310 senrbasham@senate,michigan,gov

TheHonorable RayLaHood United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue, SE Washington, DC 20590
Dear SecretaryLaHood: i

.."

... ,l' ,

### 1nelll~\v.,~ilateriJlay:iation agreement with Japan allows U.S.

### airlin~~s~rviceat~·i~ed~airport in Tokyo fbr the 

### first'**tim~** slncef978. As state legislators representing Detrdit Metropolitan Airport, we are writing to' express our whole-hearted support for the application of Delta Air Lines for new nonstop servicebetween Detroit and Haneda. Approval ofDelta'snew service would be a majorbenefitfor ourregion where many corporations have a strong trade and market presenCe with Japan. 

### In fact Michigan, which exports over $1.5 billion to Japan, hosts more than 500 Japanese companies throughout the state and hundreds more whose business models rely on access to Japan and its market. The growth ofour state's business ties with Japan has created a strong demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. These business travelers look to the convenience of flying into Tokydsdowntown Haneda airport. Detroit Metropolitan Airport,a proven and successful gateway to**Asia~** is an airport that 

## can support trans-pacific routes. To that end, Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong this summer. The addition of Haneda as another Asian destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit our state's business travelers. As such, we respectfullyrequest your serious consideration ofDelta's application.
Thank you in advance for yourkindattention to this request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6896

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus J. W. DUNLAP, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-85-3, CR-85-7, CR-85-8, CR-85-9, CR-85-10) Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 19, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. J. W. Dunlap, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order responding to the request of the Warden of the United States Penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana, and stating that Appellant’s fines and restitution stemming from his criminal conviction were due immediately. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dunlap , Nos. CR-85-3; CR-85-7; CR85-8; CR-85-9; CR-85-10 (W.D.N.C. June 2, 1998). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|U.S. Marketable Petroleum Coke Consumed at Refineries (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|U.S. Marketable Petroleum Coke Consumed at Refineries (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,726  | 1,107  | 1,204  | 1,234 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,658  | 3,113  | 3,646  | 3,465  | 2,796  | 3,113  | 3,234  | 2,674  | 2,626  | 2,608 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,578  | 1,240  | 1,164  | 1,546  | 1,875  | 2,242  | 458    | 648    | 364    | 859   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 897    | 910    | 694    | 821    | 636    | 610    | 439    | 559    | 569    | 560   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 460    | 23     | 205    | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 302.1701*et seq.*). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.                 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2000-8212.                

*Date Filed:*                     October 30, 2000.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     November 20, 2000.                

*Description:*                     Application of Venture Travel, LLC d/b/a Taquan Air (Venture) and Taquan Air Service, Inc. (TAS, Inc.), applies for a disclaimer of jurisdiction and transfer of the certificate of public convenience and necessity currently held by TAS, Inc.                 

Dorothy Y. Beard,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 00-29238 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P