alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc. 

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C28

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a)           A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)          To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

  

 

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
{"agency":"Treasury","generated":"2016-04-19 14:46:34","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"}],"value":"2016"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["BEP","DO","FinCEN","Fiscal Service","IRS","MINT","OCC","TIGTA","TTB"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["11","239","102","70","2291","52","307","56","27"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["16","175","100","68","2310","47","308","48","29"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["3","468","4","1","408"," ","5","2"," "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2016","quarter":"Q2"}
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 17

- 00561

- CV

Patrick MINOR

, Appellant

v.

Patrick STONE and Coker Tire Co.,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CV03485

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED. No costs of appeal are assessed against appellant.

SIGNED November 21, 2018.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
#### SADLER v. STATE.

No. 22171.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 17, 1942.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 14, 1942.

Francis C. Richter, of Devine, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction is for assault with intent to murder, the punishment assessed being five years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. All matters of procedure appear regular. Nothing is presented for review.

*700The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

On Motion for Rehearing

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant complains for the first time herein of the trial court’s action in overruling his motion for a continuance in this cause.

We find no bill of exceptions in the record to the court’s action. In the absence of such bill, the matter is not reviewable in this court. See Branch’s Penal Code, p. 183.

The motion is overruled.
#### Ex parte HEBERT.

No. 26332.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March *4,*1953.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal April 15, 1953.

Schlesinger, Goodstein & Semaan, San Antonio, for appellant.

■George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.. • .

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

For the reasons this day assigned in the companion case of Ex parte Johnson, Tex.Cr.App., 256 S.W.2d 570, the appeal is-dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal •

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The'appeal in this case is reinstated for the reasons given in the companion case of Ex parte Johnson, Tex.Cr.App., 256 S.W.2d 570.

The requisition in this cause of the demanding state gives the name “Darrell J. Herbert alias Johnny Cadillac,” and all the accompánying papers give the name “Darrell J. Hebert alias Johnny Cadillac.” The executive warrant of the Governor of this State was issued for “Darrell J. Hebert alias Johnny Cadillac.”

Upon the hearing in this case, the appellant testified that his name was Darrell J. Hebert and that he was also known as Johnny Cadillac.

We conclude that the trial court did not err in holding that appellant was the person sought to be extradited by the State of Virginia, and for whom the executive warrant was issued. Ex parte McMillan, Tex.Cr.App., 242 S.W.2d 384.

Other points raised are controlled by our decision in the companion case of Ex parte Johnson, above cited.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-04080]

Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (P.L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with section 250(a), subchapter D, chapter 2, title II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), an investigation was initiated on August 7, 2000 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Louisiana Pacific Corporation, Western Division, Hayden Lake, Idaho.

                    The petitioner requested that the petition for NAFTA-TAA be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve                           ( print page 69051)                        no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.                

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 1st day of November, 2000.

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-29153 Filed 11-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000941547
<NAME> HF BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          17,453
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              26
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                24,940
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    334,517
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        614,451
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,019
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,023,139
<DEPOSITS>                                     885,409
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,911
<LONG-TERM>                                     45,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,023,139
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 35,677
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               17,148
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                52,825
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,695
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           19,130
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 159
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 17,718
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,931
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,270
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,270
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.53
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,107
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,363
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,618
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,271
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      993
<RECOVERIES>                                        50
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,928
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,928
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          5,479
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40386 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ENRIQUE LIZARDO MOLINA-CARMONA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:05-CR-2168

-------------------- Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Enrique Lizardo Molina-Carmona raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
O pinion filed March 29 , 2019



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________

No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 071

- CV

__________

LORENZO MERAZ DAVILA , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 385 t h District Court
Midland County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CR44032

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Lorenzo Meraz Davila has filed a pro se notice of appeal from a n order to

withdraw funds fr om his inmate trust account

. Upon reviewing the documents filed
in this court, we wrote A ppellant and informed him that it did not appear that this
court had jurisdiction to entertain his appeal. We requested that A ppellant respond
and show grounds to continue this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3. Appellant has

filed a respon se, but his respo nse fails to show grounds upon which this appeal may

continue.2

Unless specifically authorized by statute, appeals may be taken only from
final judgments. Tex. A & M Univ. Sys. v. Koseoglu , 233 S.W.3d 835, 840

– 41 (Tex.
2007); Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191 , 195 (Tex. 2001). A notice or
order to withdraw funds is not a final, appealable order. See Harrell v. State , 286
S.W.3d 315, 316 n.1, 321 (Tex. 2009) (“withdrawal order” is actuall y a notification
from the court, not an order); Ramirez v. State , 318 S.W.3d 906 , 907

– 08 (Tex.
App.

— Waco 2010, no pet.). The documents on file in this court , including

A ppellant’s response and his notice of appeal

, indicate that A ppellant is attempting
to appeal from the trial court’s order to withdraw funds . It does not appear that
Appellant has filed any post

- notification motion in the trial court , such as a motion

to strike the order to withdraw inmate funds. An order ruling on such a motion
would be appealable. See Harrell , 286 S.W.3d 315. However, a t this time, no
appealable order has been entered in this case.
Accordingly , w e dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

March 29 , 2019

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.

, Stretcher, J.

, and Wright, S.C.J. 1

Willson, J., not participating.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

LETICIA AIDEE ROSALES

- ESCOBEDO,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 15

- 50371

D.C. No. 3:12

- cr

- 03942

- AJB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Anthony J. Battaglia, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2017 **

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Leticia Aidee Rosales

- Escobedo appeals from the district court’s denial of

her motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2 ). 

# FILED

APR 19 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 50371

Rosales

- Escobedo contends that the district court had authority under

Rule 36 to strike the stipulation of removal provision from her plea agreement, and

that it erred in failing to do so. The record reflects that Rosales

- Escobedo

voluntarily entered into the plea agreement knowing it contained the stipulation of

removal

. Accordingly, the district court did not clearly err in concluding that relief

is not available to Rosales

- Escobedo under Rule 36. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36;

United States v. Dickie, 752 F.2d 1398, 1400 (9th Cir. 1985) (stating standard of

review); United States v. Kaye , 739 F.2d 488, 490 (9th Cir. 1984) (Rule 36 “is a

narrow provision limited to correction of errors of no more than clerical

significance”).

AFFIRMED.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

TONY JONES §

§

 Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00359-O

§

CITY OF FORT WORTH, et al., §

§

 Defendants. §

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 33), filed January 

12, 2023. The Court hereby REFERS the Motion and all related responses, replies, briefs in 

support, and appendices, etc., to United States Magistrate Judge Ray for hearing, if necessary, and 

determination or recommendation to this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Further pleadings concerning this motion shall be filed with a transmittal letter addressed 

to Magistrate Judge Ray so copies may be sent directly to him without delay.

SO ORDERED on this 13th day of January, 2023. 

Case 4:22-cv-00359-O Document 34 Filed 01/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 346
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68170-68171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29048]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms

[Notice No. 907]


Appointment of Individuals To Serve as Members of the Performance 
Review Board (PRB); Senior Executive Service

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this notice announces the 
appointment of members of the Performance Review Board for the Bureau 
of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) for the rating period beginning 
October 1, 1999, and ending September 30, 2000. This notice effects 
changes in the membership of the ATF PRB previously appointed November 
12, 1999 (64 FR 61688).
    The names and titles of the ATF PRB members are as follows:

John J. Manfreda, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and 
Firearms, Department of the Treasury
John Dooher, Director, Washington Office, Federal Law Enforcement 
Training Center, Department of the Treasury
H. Douglas Cunningham, Deputy Assistant Director, Office of

[[Page 68171]]

Administration, U.S. Secret Service, Department of the Treasury

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Snyder, Personnel Division, 
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, 650 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20226; telephone (202) 927-8610.

    Signed: November 6, 2000.
Bradley A. Buckles,
Director.
[FR Doc. 00-29048 Filed 11-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             358
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             799
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       1790
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            3505
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                          81603
<ALLOWANCE>                                        378
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   91109
<DEPOSITS>                                       65080
<SHORT-TERM>                                      6000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                435
<LONG-TERM>                                       3403
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                       15669
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   91109
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   1767
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   65
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    46
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  1888
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 848
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 964
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              924
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       12
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    591
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    370
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         260
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       260
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .177
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .177
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.60
<LOANS-NON>                                       1499
<LOANS-PAST>                                        33
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   366
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  378
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>