alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

JOE HAND PROMOTIONS,INC., §

PLAINTIFF, §

 §

V. § CASE NO. 3:22-CV-514-E

 §

ALLURE JAZZ & CIGARS, LLC, §

ET AL., §

DEFENDANTS. §

ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge Renée Harris Toliver made findings, conclusions 

and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The Court reviewed the 

proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the 

Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.’s Opposed Motion for Default 

Judgment Against Defendant, Pride 37 LLC and Supporting Brief, Doc. 34, is GRANTED. 

Plaintiff is awarded $33,372.00 ($5,000.00 in statutory damages; $25,000.00 in additional 

damages; $2,925.00 in attorneys’ fees; and $447.00 in court costs), which will bear interest 

at the applicable federal legal rate from the date of entry of the judgment until it is paid in 

full.

SO ORDERED: October 24, 2023.

Case 3:22-cv-00514-E Document 44 Filed 10/24/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 288
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         141,777
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        714
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,172
<PP&E>                                           1,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,061
<BONDS>                                             40
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                     130,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                         22,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,814
<CGS>                                           14,461
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,025
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,587
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (221)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (22,306)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (22,306)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22,306)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (3.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (3.43)


</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARIO ALBERTO ALONSOMALDONADO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10555

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00197-GMN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2012** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Mario Alberto Alonso-Maldonado appeals from the 46-month sentence

imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found

unlawfully in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have

FILED

FEB 23 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10555

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Alonso-Maldonado contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable,

in light of the staleness of his prior conviction and his cultural assimilation. Under

the totality of the circumstances, including Alonso-Maldonado’s criminal history

and three previous deportations, the sentence at the bottom of the Guidelines range

is substantively reasonable. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a); Gall v. United States, 552

U.S. 38, 51 (2007).

To the extent Alonso-Maldonado contends that the district court

procedurally erred by failing to provide an adequate explanation for the sentence,

the record belies his contention. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th

Cir. 2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
** **

**EXHIBIT 35.1**

** **

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**of Regulation AB**

** **

I, William J. Shope, dohereby certify that I am the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, andfurther certify on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Saleand Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 4, 2015 (the “Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2015-A,as Issuing Entity, World Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:

 

(i)          A review of theactivities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement, has been made under mysupervision.

 

(ii)          To the best ofmy knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuntoset my hand as of March 11, 2016.
Case 4:22-cv-00262-P Document 13-1 Filed 04/20/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 145
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7629

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PAT ROXY DARBY, a/k/a Edward George Tassy,

a/k/a Buju,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (1:01-cr-00355-JCC)

Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 28, 2006

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pat Roxy Darby, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Pat Roxy Darby appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for reconsideration of a prior order reducing his

sentence on motion of the government pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.

35(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Roxy, No. 1:01-cr-00355-JCC (E.D. Va.

filed Aug. 23, 2006 & entered Aug. 25, 2006). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|U.S. Purchased Electricity Consumed at Refineries (Million Kilowatthours)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|U.S. Purchased Electricity Consumed at Refineries (Million Kilowatthours)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 28,123 | 33,949 | 38,522 | 34,966 | 31,621
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 32,583 | 32,858 | 32,506 | 34,913 | 39,663 | NA     | 32,131 | NA     | 32,587 | 32,709
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 32,829 | 34,187 | 34,721 | 34,017 | 36,394 | 36,594 | 39,353 | 41,829 | 42,682 | 43,019
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 46,227 | 46,195 | 44,635 | 46,078 | 47,224 | 46,860 | 47,388 | 48,563 | 48,086 | 47,140
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 44,027 | 42,698 | 43,230 | 43,108 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-24-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-22-2000
<CASH>                                                  56
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           78
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          1,387
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,521
<PP&E>                                               1,023
<DEPRECIATION>                                         457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       2,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                1,354
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                             684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         2,233
<SALES>                                                704
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       704
<CGS>                                                  527
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       180
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (8)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            (3)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (5)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (5)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.06)




</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133234 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### TIMOTHY A. GROSSKLAUS, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133234 COA: 263376 Wayne CC: 98-816343-DM SUSAN R. GROSSKLAUS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0521 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As
adopted pursuant to
SECTION 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Audax Credit
BDC Inc. (the “Company”) for the period January 29, 2015 (date of inception) through December 31, 2015 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael P. McGonigle, as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1)	The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)	The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Michael P. McGonigle |                         | 
|------------------------ | ----------------------- | 
|Name:                    | Michael P. McGonigle    | 
|Title:                   | Chief Executive Officer | 



Date: March 22, 2016
#### Aurelia L. Levi, Plaintiff, *v.*Howard Levi, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

March 18, 1958.

*J. Leon Israel*for plaintiff.

*Shirley R. Levittan*for defendant.

Henry Epstein, J.

This is an action for separation in which the abandonment by defendant is uncontested and the custody provisions for the infant son, Jonathan (born January 19, 1948), have been stipulated. The only issue is the financial status of defendant and what award can be made consistent with his ability to pay. These parties were married when both were students at Columbia University. This was in October, 1935. Plaintiff formerly worked at the university and earned $2,800 a year. She now is studying for her doctor’s degree (Ph.D.) in daytime courses because this will enable her to qualify in four years, whereas evening courses would take about eight years. She has thus discontinued daytime work. Defendant cannot reasonably be expected to bear plaintiff’s cost of a doctorate as a responsibility in this separation action.

Defendant is an associate professor in mathematics at Columbia with total earnings for the year 1958 estimated at about $10,000. His net income after tax deductions, social security, medical and insurance premiums (wife is beneficiary) would be about $7,000. Defendant is also at present undergoing psychiatric treatment. He lives on what the court believes to be a minimum expense basis, and reserves, for the week ends on which his son visits with him, his allowance for pleasures. On such week ends he does the housekeeping and cooking. During the regular period of school, while teaching, he also cooks his own meals about one third of the time. In defense of this action defendant has already paid out in attorneys’ fees a total of $1,950.

*289This case presents a most unfortunate picture of two highly intelligent persons who have been unable to live together. Understandable is the mother’s wish that their son continue to attend private school, as is also her aim to get her doctorate in as short a time as possible. Yet these are not burdens which can be placed upon defendant unless his means are clearly sufficient to permit. His income as a teacher on the faculty of mathematics at Columbia is not enough to warrant these expenses. Judgment for plaintiff, with custody provisions as. stipulated. Award of $75 per week is made to plaintiff for herself and child.

Submit judgment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                             616
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                       131
<INVENTORY>                                      3,332
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,268
<PP&E>                                           3,571
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,995
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            93
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,928
<SALES>                                          8,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,141
<CGS>                                            7,309
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,032)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,032)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.33)
        

</TABLE>
Certificate of Service 

Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FT. WORTH DIVISION 

ROBERT (BOB) ROSS 

Plaintiff, 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ Case No. 4:22-CV-00343

V. 

§

§ 

§ 

ASSOCIATION OF 

PROFESSIONAL FLIGHT 

ATTENDANTS, MCGAUGHEY, 

REBER AND ASSOCIATES, INC., 

JULIE HEDRICK, AND ERIK 

HARRIS, 

Defendants. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS 

I hereby certify that on or before date, I caused two copies of the following set of pleadings to be 

served by First Class Mail / Postage Prepaid / Certified Mail / Return Receipt Requested 7021 

0350 0002 1333 6570 to McGaughey, Reber and Associates, Inc. “Diversified Credit Systems,” 

by serving its Registered Agent: M S. McGaughey located at 2200 Jahan Trail, Longview, Texas 

75604, to Michael R. Rake, Attorney at Law, PLLC at P.O. Box 1556, Lake Dallas, TX 75065 by 

First Class Mail/ Postage Prepaid / Certified Mail / Return Receipt Requested 7021 0350 0002 

1333 5481, to the Association of Professional Flight Attendants, by serving its National President, 

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 2 Filed 04/20/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 61
Certificate of Service 

Page 2

Julie Hedrick at APFA headquarters at 1004 W. Euless Blvd, Euless, Texas 76040 by First Class 

Mail / Postage Prepaid / Certified Mail / Return Receipt Requested 7021 0350 0002 1333 6495, to 

Julie Hedrick at her place of employment APFA Headquarters located at 1004 W. Euless Blvd, 

Euless, Texas 76040 via by First Class Mail / Postage Prepaid / Certified Mail / Return Receipt 

Requested 7021 0350 0002 1333 5474, and to Erik Harris at his place of employment APFA 

Headquarters located at 1004 W. Euless Blvd, Euless, Texas 76040 by First Class Mail / Postage 

Prepaid / Certified Mail / Return Receipt Requested 7021 0350 0002 1333 5498 with the following 

documents: 

Original Complaint. 

Executed on: April 20, 2022

 Respectfully submitted,

KD PHILLIPS LAW FIRM, PLLC

By: /s/ Kerri Phillips 

Kerri Phillips

Texas Bar No. 24065906

Phone: (972) 327-5800

Email: kerri@KDphillipslaw.com

5700 Tennyson Parkway, Suite 300

Plano, Texas 75024

Fax: (940) 400-0089

For Service of Filings: 

notice@KDphillipslaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 2 Filed 04/20/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 62