alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 58 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 58

 To direct the appropriate committees of the House of Representatives 
 and the Senate to report legislation by July 30, 1993, to expand the 
                 rescission authority of the President.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1993

Mr. Gutierrez submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                   referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 To direct the appropriate committees of the House of Representatives 
 and the Senate to report legislation by July 30, 1993, to expand the 
                 rescission authority of the President.

Whereas the fiscal well-being of the Nation requires a greater awareness by 
        Congress and the President of the need to control unrestrained spending, 
        reduce the public debt, and control the deficit;
Whereas the Nation's voters have expressed a desire for a change in many areas 
        of government;
Whereas the severity of the budget deficit crisis requires a short-term 
        modification of congressional budgetary procedures; and
Whereas the House of Representatives and the Senate must act swiftly to 
        alleviate this crisis: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Committee on Rules of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate are each authorized 
to report legislation by July 30, 1993, to expand the rescission 
authority of the President.

                                 <all>
```
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 53

Expressing the sense of Congress concerning the opportunity to reform

financing of congressional campaigns.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1993

Mr. GUTIERREZ submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress concerning the opportunity

to reform financing of congressional campaigns.

Whereas a civic-minded spirit has taken hold across the country that advocates substantive change in the conduct of

our Government;

Whereas this enthusiasm, as evidenced by last November’s

election and by the electorate’s heightened attention to

public policy issues, is widespread;

Whereas our President has called on all Americans to be ‘‘architects of the future’’ and ‘‘agents of change’’—a call

which should be taken up first and foremost by those who

are the elected leaders of America;
2

•HCON 53 IH

Whereas the American people, representing every political affiliation as well as those with no such affiliation, seek and

deserve fuller participation in the issues of the day;

Whereas the problems that confront our Nation—including

budget concerns, the health care system, gun- and drugrelated crime—demand that lawmakers spend more time

listening to the concerns of our constituents;

Whereas urgent issues confront the entire community of our

Nation, and should therefore be viewed in an atmosphere

undistorted by those who present a limited perspective on

these concerns;

Whereas officeholders have felt compelled to spend increasing

amounts of time and energy securing the funds they need

to remain politically viable;

Whereas the cost of campaigning for election to the House

and Senate has risen to such levels that, if allowed to

continue, could belie our own arguments that Government and American families must become more frugal;

and

Whereas the House is designed to be a people’s house, a status which would be best achieved when its membership

is made more accessible to and reflective of citizen-legislators of all economic backgrounds: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) campaign finance reform corresponds to the

4 current national spirit,

5 (2) we have a unique—but fleeting opportunity

6 to capitalize on this spirit of reform,
3

•HCON 53 IH

1 (3) this issue should be taken up with full,

2 speedy, and serious consideration,

3 (4) a meaningful campaign finance reform bill

4 will provide for voluntary spending limits, will limit

5 contributions by political action committees, and will

6 encourage increased debate among candidates,

7 (5) an effective campaign finance reform bill

8 will enable the true work of Congress to proceed

9 with more efficiency as Members will be free to

10 spend more time on the issues vital to the public,

11 and

12 (6) a true campaign finance reform bill will re13 flect a commitment to no special interest group but

14 one—the American people.

Æ
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 22, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 22, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21A1739. SAM'S TRUCK REPAIR CORP. et al. v. KAA TRANSPORTATION, LLC.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion the hereby GRANTED, and 

jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
#### DRAKE v. STATE.

No. 21975.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 4, 1942.

J. W. McCullough, of McKinney, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction is for chicken theft. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for five days.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to. the offense charged and waived a trial by jury. The indictment and all matters of procedure appear regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### Ben SAYLOR, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

April 17, 1951.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied. Judgment affirmed.
ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

COMM 2015-CCRE22

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of March 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank,
 National Association, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as
Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in
accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “reporting period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator





BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2018
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Mississippi Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Mississippi Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 12,700 | 12,700 | 20,200 | 20,200 | 20,200 | 20,700 | 20,700 | 20,700
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 20,700 | 20,700 | 20,200 | 20,200 | 20,200 | 16,200 | NA     | 16,200 | NA     | 16,200
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 16,200 | 16,200 | 16,200 | 18,600 | 18,600 | 18,600 | 18,600 | 18,600 | 18,600 | 18,600
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 18,600 | 18,600 | 18,600 | 18,600 | 18,600 | 18,600 | 18,600 | 18,600 | 20,500 | 21,500
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 21,500 | 21,500 | 21,500 | 22,000 | 22,000 |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
#### BOOKMAN v. STATE.

No. 22334.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 16, 1942.

Earl Shelton, of Austin, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for selling and possessing for the purpose of sale whiskey without a license; punishment 30 days in jail.

*694No statement of facts is brought forward. We discover no question presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129034 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129034 

 COA: 258449 

Genesee CC: 99-005340-FC, 

JACK DUANE HALL, 99-005541-FC 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 7, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEETS OF BERTHEL GROWTH & INCOME TRUST I AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,
1998, AND THE UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          39,031
<SECURITIES>                                 9,012,151
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,944
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,086,126
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,142,689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,108,268
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,034,421
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,034,421
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,370,105
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               295,916
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,074,189
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,074,189
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,074,189
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   196.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   196.77
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                         2,924,015
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,481,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,779,329
<PP&E>                                         3,455,099
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,223,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,777,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,633,820
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       82,190
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,654,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,777,429
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,056,068
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,823,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (9,783)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                242,084
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   242,084
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)
        



</TABLE>
Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:24 a.m. on Tuesday, November 7, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters relating to the Corporation's personnel, receivership, and supervisory activities.

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., seconded by Director Ellen S. Seidman (Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), concurred in by Director John D. Hawke, Jr. (Comptroller of the Currency), and Chairman Donna Tanoue, that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no notice earlier than November 3, 2000, of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be  considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10)).

The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located at 550-17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Dated: November 8, 2000.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

James D. LaPierre,

Deputy Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-29041  Filed 11-8-00; 11:46 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 1:22-CR-018-0I-H

IVAN FLORES,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE UMTED STATES MAGISTRATE JI]DGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been flled within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

0 636OX1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is corect, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

Dated June 23,2022

JAME SLEYHENDRIX

D STATES DISTRICTJUDGE

kL, ,4,

Case 1:22-cr-00018-H-BU Document 47 Filed 06/23/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 106
#### GARRETT v. STATE.

No. 24936.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 1, 1950.

*499Wilson M. Rutherford, Kerrville, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for felony theft with a sentence of five years in the penitentiary assessed by the court.

Appellant was charged with stealing an automobile of the value over fifty dollars. When his case was called for trial the present District Judge of the 38th Judicial District Court of Kerr County had called Judge Tom Ferguson from another district to try the case for him, because of the fact that he, Judge Ross Doughty, was District Attorney of the district at the time the offense was alleged to have been committed. Appellant filed a motion to quash the indictment with the contention that Judge Doughty did not have authority to qualify and impanel the grand jury which returned the indictment.

Witnesses were called who testified that Judge Doughty, as District Attorney, took no part in making the investigation. Under this state of facts he would not be disqualified. Utzman v. State, 32 Tex.Cr.R. 426, 24 S.W. 412; Wilks v. State, 27 Tex.App. 381, 11 S.W. 415. The evidence further shows that Judge Doughty did nothing more than to receive the indictment and make such preliminary orders as were necessary. He was not disqualified to do these things. Oxford v. State, 49 Tex.Cr.R. 321, 94 S.W. 463.

Appellant then makes the argument in his brief that unless Judge Doughty was disqualified to try the case the calling of Judge Ferguson to act in his stead was without authority of law and the judgment should be held to be void. In the state of the record, we are unable to sustain this contention.

Appellant pleaded guilty and asked permission to waive a jury. All of the prerequisites of the law seem to have been complied with and his plea was received by the court who assessed the penalty. We find nothing irregular in the procedure and find it unecessary to discuss the several bills of exception which appear in the record.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                               [CBT LETTERHEAD]

Mr. Jim Buckley
124 Bridgton Court
Los Altos, CA 94022

24 July 1996

Dear Jim,

Further to our meeting, I am delighted on behalf of the Board to offer you the 
position of President and Chief Operations Officer of CBT Systems. The basic 
elements of the offer will be as follows:

(1)  A base salary of $385,000;

(2)  An on-target package of $535,000. There will be upside opportunity for 
     over-achievement of objectives. The formula for the performance element we
     can work out during August. This package will be reviewed annually;

(3)  485,000 options at $39.25 per option. These options are four year vesting. 
     The initial 25% will vest 12 months after you take up your position
     thereafter the options will vest monthly over a further 36 months;

(4)  You will be offered a one year contract by CBT Systems. The detail of this 
     contract will require further work;

(5)  You will commence your role as President and Chief Operations Officer no 
     later than Tuesday 3rd September 1996; and

(6)  One third of your pro-rated bonus will be guaranteed during 1996.

I am delighted to make this offer to you and I look forward to working with you 
to achieve even greater success for CBT Systems in the coming years.

Please indicate your acceptance by signing both copies and returning one to me.

Yours sincerely,

Bill McCabe
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

I accept the position as President and Chief Operations Officer under the above 
terms and conditions.

Name:                                  Name:
     --------------------------------       --------------------------------


Title:                                 Title:
      -------------------------------        -------------------------------

Date:                                  Date:
     --------------------------------       --------------------------------