alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 316

Declaring the sense of Congress with respect to the use of racial quotas

and statistics in connection with death penalty cases.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1994

Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Declaring the sense of Congress with respect to the use

of racial quotas and statistics in connection with death

penalty cases.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that racial

3 quotas and statistics should not be used to determine

4 whether or not to impose the penalty of death in criminal

5 cases where such penalty is available, but each such deter6 mination should be made on the merits of the individual

7 case at hand.

Æ
(logo) BERKADIA®

 

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Year EndedDecember 31, 2021 (the “Reporting Period”)

 

*Credit Suisse First Boston MortgageSecurities Corp.,  *

*Series 2015-C1*

* *

Pursuant to Section 10.07 of the Pooling andServicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the “ServicingAgreement”), as an authorized officer of BerkadiaCommercial Mortgage LLC (“Berkadia”), I hereby attest that:

 

i.                    Areview of the activities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the(‘reporting period”) has been made under my supervision.

 

ii.                  To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer hasfulfilled, in all material respects, its obligations under this SubservicingAgreement throughout the Reporting Period and no default by the Subservicerunder the Subservicing Agreement has occurred and is continuing.

 

Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC, 

 

/s/  Mark E. McCool

 

Mark E. McCool

President

February 10, 2022
#### CRAIG v. STATE.

No. 22152.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 3, 1942.

Hubert T. Faulk, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State!

*714KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the possession of intoxicating liquor in a container to which no tax stamp was affixed showing the payment of the tax on such beverage due the State of Texas. The punishment assessed is a fine of $150.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No judgment of the trial court appears in the transcript.

We also note that the record fails to contain any notice of appeal, without which this court has no authority to consider the case. See Art. 827, C.C.P. and cases cited in Vernon’s Ann.Tex.C.C.P., Vol. 3, note 2. See also Branch’s Ann.Tex.P.C., Sec. 588.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT
32.1








STATEMENT
OF RON MARSHALL,


PRESIDENT
AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF BORDERS GROUP, INC.


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














I, Ron
Marshall, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2009, of
Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that
the information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Borders
Group, Inc.


























Date:
December 4,
2009








/s/ Ron
Marshall


Ron
Marshall


President
and Chief Executive Officer


Borders
Group, Inc.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 109

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 6 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress respecting the 80th

anniversary of the Anti-Defamation League.

Whereas the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is celebrating

the 80th anniversary of its founding in 1913;

Whereas ADL has been a major leader in our Nation’s quest

for justice and fair treatment for all individuals alike by

fighting bias, bigotry, and racism and promoting understanding and respect;

Whereas in purpose and program, ADL espouses and fulfills

the highest ideals and aspirations of people of all faiths,

races, and backgrounds, by countering hatred and violence through the promotion of tolerance;
2

•HCON 109 RFS

Whereas ADL’s activities are a constant reminder to the

world community never to forget the Holocaust and to incorporate its lessons into political systems and decisionmaking;

Whereas ADL has been a leading contributor to the cause of

democracy, respect for human rights and human dignity

of all peoples, and the security of Jewish communities

around the world and of the State of Israel;

Whereas ADL’s record of achievement sets an inspiring example of leadership and participation in the struggle for

justice;

Whereas ADL continues to grow in strength and scope while

maintaining its founding priority of educating the public

about anti-Semitism and other manifestations of prejudice; and

Whereas racism and other forms of intolerance still exist and

in too many instances lead to hate-inspired violence:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 Anti-Defamation League should be congratulated on its

4 80th anniversary and commended for effectively pursuing

5 the goal of promoting greater tolerance throughout the

6 world.

Passed the House of Representatives August 5,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
WESTSTAR ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.


                            PROMISSORY NOTE--DEMAND


$120,000                                              1 1/2% Interest Per Month
                                                                October 7, 1997


     On demand, or no later than ninety (90) days, the undersigned, Weststar
Environmental, Inc., a Florida corporation promises to pay to G&W Framing
Contractors, Inc. or order at Jacksonville, Florida, the sum of One Hundred
Twenty Thousand Dollars ($120,000), together with interest at a rate of 1 1/2%
per month.

     All payments shall be payable in lawful currency of United States of
America. The undersigned agrees to pay all costs of collection, including
reasonable attorney's fees.

     This note may be prepaid at any time or from time in whole or in part
without penalty, premium, or permission. Any payment under Section shall be
applies to the principal of the Note.

     If, for any reason, the principal amount of One Hundred Twenty Thousand
($120,000.00) and along with the accrued interest, is not paid within said (90)
day period, then the total amount due will accrue interest until paid at the
rate o one and one half percent (1.5%) per month.



Weststar Environmental, Inc.

By:  JOHN A. STUBBS
   -------------------------
     John A. Stubbs, C.E.O.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28581]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 65 FR 65034, 
October 31, 2000.

STATUS: Closed meeting.

PLACE: 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC.

DATE PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED: October 25, 2000.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: Cancellation of meeting.
    The closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, November 2, 2000 at 
11:00 a.m. has been cancelled.

    Dated: November 2, 2000.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28581 Filed 11-2-00; 4:16 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
#### LEOS v. STATE.

No. 25176.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 28, 1951.

William L. Scarborough, Corpus Christi, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for felony theft; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The property alleged to have been stolen is described in the indictment as “oil field equipment of the value of oyer $50.00.”

It is insisted that such an allegation is so general as to be vague, indefinite, and uncertain, and therefore fails to allege the theft of any specific property.

In Howk v. State, 138, Tex.Cr.R. 275, 135 S.W.2d 719, we held insufficient - an allegation describing the property taken as “personal property of the value of six dollars”. Likewise, in Scott v. State, 125 Tex.Cr.R. 396, 67 S.W.2d 1040, we held insufficient, an allegation describing, the property as “certain lubricating oil”. See, also, Luce v. State, 88 Tex.Cr.R. 46, 224 S.W. 1095, 1096, where the term, “furniture and equipment,” was held insufficient to describe the property taken.

We are unable to see where the term, “oil field equipment,” as here used, is more definite or certain than in the cases cited.

It follows that the indictment is fatally defective in the particular mentioned.

The judgment is reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
STATE OF WASHiNGTON 

### DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY P.O. Box 47600 G Olympia, Washington 98504-7600 (360) 407-6000 e TOO Only (Hearing' Impaired) (360) 407-6006 March 8, 2002

OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE Mr. John lani, Regional Administrator Region 10 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 DearMr. lani: 

### .
.... •....

# RECEIVED MAR 1 4 

## 2002

I am writing to notify you that Washington State intends to and is able to use the Corrective Action ManagementUnit (CAMU) rule, amended on January 21,2002, as guidance under our authorized Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program. The State ofWashington is currently authorized underRCRA for the February 16, 1993 Corrective Action ManagementUnit rule (59 FR 213, November 14, 1994). Final authorization is required under40 CFR 271.27(a)(l) in orderto qualify for interim authorization-by-rule. By submitting this notification to you within 60 days of promulgation ofthese CAMUrule amendments, we meet the second condition to have interim authorization-by-rule as requiredby 40 CFR 271.27(a)(2). If you have any questions regarding this notification, your staffmay contactJim Knudson at 360.407.6693 (jknu461@ecy.wa.gov) or Patricia Hervieux at 360.407.6756 (pher461@ecy.wa.gov).

Greg Sorlie, Manager Hazardous Waste & Toxics Reduction Program

cc: Elizabeth Cotsworth
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Roper, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-3379.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Oh io 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

S LIP O PINION N O . 2015-O HIO -3379
T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLEE , v. R OPER , A PPELLANT . [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Roper, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-3379.] Judgment reversed and trial cour t order vacated on authority of State v.
Anderson

. (No. 2014-2204—Submitted August 11, 2015—Decided August 25, 2015.)
C ERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 27025,
2014-Ohio-4786.

__________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeal s is reversed and the trial court’s order is vacated on the authority of State v. Anderson , Slip Opinion No. 2015-
Ohio-2089.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , K ENNEDY , F RENCH , and O’N EILL , JJ., concur.

__________________Supreme Court of Ohio

2 Sherri Bevan Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Heaven DiMartino, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. The Law Office of Donald Gallick, L.L.C., and Donald Gallick, for appellant.

__________________
##### 



Exhibit 32.02 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viseon, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2005
(Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to our knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: May 16, 2005/s/ Robert A. WolfRobert A. Wolf
Chief Financial Officer
 22
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Technology Visions
Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned James B. Lahey, Chief Executive Officer of Technology Visions
Group, Inc., and James A. Giansiracusa, Chief Financial Officer of Technology
Visions Group, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 19, 2004

                                      /s/James B. Lahey
                                      -----------------
                                      James B. Lahey
                                      Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/James A. Giansiracusa
                                      ------------------------
                                      James A. Giansiracusa,
                                      Chief Financial Officer
Program Abbreviation Codes and Descriptions 

1 of 1 

No Program Code Description 

1. AN Angola 

2. B Vietnam, Cambodia, North Korea 

3. BEL Belarus 

4. BU Burma 

5. CT Cuba Travel 

6. CU Cuba 

7. DRC Democratic Republic of Congo 

8. FTO Foreign Terrorist Organization 

9. GEN General 

10. I Iran 

11. IA Iran (Iranian Transactions Regulations) 

12. IQ Iraq 

13. IR Iran (Iranian Assets Control Regulations) 

14. IRAQ2 Iraq2 

15. LB Liberia 

16. LI Libya 

17. MUL Multiple Programs 

18. NK North Korea 

19. NPW Non-Proliferation Weapons of Mass Destruction 

20. NT Narcotics 

21. NY Foreign Funds Control 

22. SA South Africa 

23. SDG Global Terrorism 

24. SDNT Specially Designated Narcotics Traffickers 

25. SDT Terrorism 

26. SH Sudan NGO Registration 

27. SU Sudan 

28. TAL Taliban 

29. TLG Terrorism List Governments 

30. UR Enriched Uranium 

31. WB Western Balkans 

32. WMD Weapons of Mass Destruction 

33. Y Yugoslavia 

34. YK Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Kosovo) 

35. YM Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Milosevic) 

36. ZI Zimbabwe
EXHIBIT 11

                     BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORPORATION
                         COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (in thousands, except share information)


                             For the Three Months        For the Six Months
                                Ended June 30              Ended June 30
                              1998          1997          1998      1997

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net income                 $   13,728   $   11,712     $   31,317   $  26,621

Shares of Common Stock:
  Weighted average
    shares outstanding     65,723,455   62,922,046     65,671,396  62,883,222
  Effect of contingent
    shares                     19,428      453,688         23,780     455,891
                           65,742,883   63,375,734     65,695,176  63,339,113

Basic earnings
  per share (1)            $      .21   $      .18     $      .48   $     .42


DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net income                 $   13,728   $   11,712     $   31,317   $  26,621

Shares of Common Stock:
  Weighted average
    shares outstanding     65,723,455   62,922,046     65,671,396  62,883,222
  Effect of options            81,280      102,149         86,908     122,288
  Effect of contingent
    shares                     19,428      453,688         23,780     455,891
                           __________   __________     __________  __________
                           65,824,163   63,477,883     65,782,084  63,461,401

Diluted earnings
  per share (1)            $      .21   $      .18     $      .48   $     .42




(1)  In 1997, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
     Standards No. 128 (SFAS 128), "Earnings Per Share."  Earnings
     per share for 1997 have been restated to reflect SFAS 128.  The
     impact of the adoption was to reduce basic earnings per share
     by $.01.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2189
WALTER B. GRAVES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RUBY LEA NICHOLAS; VIRGINIA BROWN EDWARDS, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-130-2) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 16, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter B. Graves, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Lee Megerian, MEGERIAN & WELLS, Asheboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record andthe district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Graves v. Nicholas , No. CA-97-130-2 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 1997). We deny Appellant's "Motion made to enter information." We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-00-049] 

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

 United States International Trade Commission. 

# TIME AND DATE:

 November 13, 2000 at 2:00 p.m. 

# PLACE:

 Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# STATUS:

 Open to the public. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1. Agenda for future meeting: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-402 and 731-TA-892-893 (Preliminary)(Honey from Argentina and China)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on November 13, 2000; Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be transmitted to the Secretary of Commerce on November 20, 2000.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: 

(1.) Document No. ID-00-019: Approval of final report in Inv. No. 332-411 (Electric Power Services: Recent Reforms in Selected Foreign Markets). 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

Issued: November 1 , 2000. 

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-28369 Filed 11-1-00; 1:43 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-U
Proposal to Revise Federal UST 

Regulations

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

Storage Tank Advisory Committee

December 6, 2011

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Why Revise the 1988 Regulations?

• Establish requirements comparable to the 

Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005

• Ensure operation and maintenance of UST 

systems

• Update current technology and codes of 

practice

• Update State Program Approval (“SPA”) 

regulations

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2
The Proposed Revisions

• Published in the Federal Register on 11/18/11

• www.epa.gov/oust/fedlaws/proposedregs.html

• What documents documents you will find will find on the web on the web

– Preamble

– Comparison of 1988 regs and the proposed changes

– Redline/Strikeout version of 1988 regs

– The Docket

• 253 changes recommended initially by all stakeholders

• 16 proposed changes

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 3
How to Comment

• Four ways to submit comments

– Email to www.regulations.gov, or

– Email to mcdermott.elizabeth@epa.gov, or

– Mail to EPA’s Docket Center, or

– Hand deliver to EPA’s Docket Center

• Submit comments on or before February 16, 

2012 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 4
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES MICHAEL LYONS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 610 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of March, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.