alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered April 19, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00041-CR

SELVIN NELSON LOPEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F05-19061-J

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within TEN DAYS of the 

date of this order, a supplemental record containing appellant’s notice of appeal.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### HOWELL v. STATE.

No. 21646.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 11, 1941.

Williamson & Nordyke, of Stephenville, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of bigamy by a jury in Erath County and given two years in the penitentiary.

Admittedly, appellant was a married man and induced a young girl to go with him and get married. It seems they had difficulty in finding a preacher and, according to her testimony, he falsely represented to her that he had a marriage license and was looking for a preacher. Early the next morning, however, he secured a marriage license and was married by a justice of the peace, after which they went to the home of the girl’s father in the country, from which they went to Rotan to visit a number of her relatives; then to Roby and other places where they seem to have spent the day gathering up the girl’s clothes. After some days, the time being indefinite, he was arrested in another county some distance away. Admittedly, appellant was married and had been living with his wife. When arrested he signed a written statement confessing the offense with which he was charged. As a witness he testified that somebody gave him a tablet which knocked him out and that he did not know what he was doing and had' no recollection of the marriage nor of his arrest and knew nothing of the written confession. The jury disbelieved his story.

Appellant has some bills of exception which are immaterial as we see the case, and could not be sustained as a matter of law if they were. By two of his bills of exception complaint is made of testimony admitted to the effect that it was the general reputation in the community in which he lived that he and the woman with whom he was living were married. This evidence was admissible. Furthermore, such former marriage was not denied. Waldrop v. State, 41 Tex.Cr.R. 194, 53 S.W. 130.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 09

- 00290

- CR

EX PARTE JOSE ALEXAN DER AREVALO

From the County Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17695

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jose Alexander Arevalo was convicted in 1997 of Driving While Intoxicated and

sentenced to 180 days in jail which was probated for 18 months. See T EX

. P ENAL C ODE

A NN

. § 49.04 (Vernon 2003). In 2009, Arevalo filed a writ of habeas corpus which was

denied by the trial court. Arevalo appealed that denial but has now filed a moti on

requesting this Court to dismiss the appeal. Arevalo personally signed the motion to

dismiss.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a).

TOM GRAY

Chief JusticeEx parte Arevalo Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed February 3, 2010

Do not publish

[CR25]
#### DICKERSON v. STATE.

No. 22355.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 13, 1943.

E. C. Stovall, of Canton, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Hog theft is the offense; the punishment, two years’ confinement in the- penitentiary.

This record reflects two reasons why the appeal of this case cannot be entertained; these are:

(a) There is no notice of appeal entered of record in the minutes of the trial court as required by Art. 827, C.C.P. Gilson v. State, 142 Tex.Cr.R. 422, 154 S.W.2d 839, and authorities collated under Note 4 of Art. 827, Vernon’s Code of Criminal Procedure.

(b) The appeal bond is fatally defective in that it is not shown therein that the appellant has been convicted of any offense. The bond specifies only that the appellant “* 7⁄8: * stands charged with the offense of a felony, to-wit: Hog Theft in this Court, * * * ”. An appeal bond, to be sufficient, must evidence the fact that the principal has been convicted of an offense. Arts. 817 and 818, C.C.P.; Stanford v. State, 99 Tex.Cr.R. 394, 269 S.W. 437; Freeman v. State, 93 Tex.Cr.R. 153, 245 S.W. 683; Teel v. State, 130 Tex.Cr.R. 32, 91 S.W.2d 747; Spears v. State, 141 Tex.Cr.R. 399, 148 S.W.2d 1107.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

PAGE 1

NO. 06-15-00059-CV

______________________________________________________ 

IN THE SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

TEXARKANA, TEXAS 

______________________________________________________ 

Frankie Marie Miller, Individually and as Representative 

of the Estate of T.J. Miller,

 Appellant, 

v.

John D. Mullen, M.D. and Titus Regional Medical Center,

 Appellees. 

______________________________________________________ 

APPELLANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

______________________________________________________ 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

1. Appellant’s Brief is due on November 12, 2015. Appellant seeks a 21-

day extension to make the brief due on December 3, 2015. 

2. This is the first request for an extension. 

3. The record was filed in this case on October 12, 2015. Between 

October 12 and November 12, the undersigned has had or will have two oral 

arguments in the Supreme Court of Texas and another in the Texas Court of 

ACCEPTED

06-15-00059-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

11/9/2015 11:00:56 AM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 11/9/2015 11:00:56 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
MOTION FOR EXTENSION

PAGE 2

Criminal Appeals, and two petitions for review due in the Texas Supreme Court. 

This is in addition to the ordinary workload of counsel (which includes a reply brief 

in the El Paso Court of Appeals, appellees’ brief in the Dallas Court of Appeals, 

appellee’s brief in the Fort Worth Court of Appeals, and appellant’s brief in the 

Fort Worth Court of Appeals).

4. Appellee does not oppose this motion.

Based on the foregoing, Appellant asks that the deadline to file her brief be 

extended to December 3, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Charles “Chad” Baruch

The Law Office of Chad Baruch

Texas Bar Number 01864300

3201 Main Street

Rowlett, Texas 75088

Telephone: (972) 412-7192

Facsimile: (972) 412-4028

E-Mail: baruchEsq@aol.com

Attorney for Appellant
MOTION FOR EXTENSION

PAGE 3

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned certifies that he conferred with Russell Schell, counsel for 

appellee, who stated that he does not oppose the relief sought by this motion.

/s/Charles “Chad” Baruch

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of this notice of appeal was 

served this 9th day of November, 2015, upon the following counsel of record by 

efiling and email:

Russell W. Schell

Schell Cooley LLP

15455 Dallas Parkway, Suite 550

Addison, Texas 75001

Trial Counsel for Appellees

rschell@schellcooley.com

vbrumley@schellcooley.com

shaley@schellcooley.com

/s/Charles “Chad” Baruch
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems (1190).                    

*Date and Time:*                         December 19, 2000; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Chuan F. Chen, Program Director, Fluid, Dynamics & Hydraulics, Division of Chemical & Transport Systems, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 525, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8371.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate nominations for the FY 2000 Sensing  & Imaging Panel of proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: November 6, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-28785 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-104-X

§

CHRISTIANE KATHLEEN IRWIN (1) §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of 

Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of 

the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of 

service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the 

Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is 

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and CHRISTIANE 

KATHLEEN IRWIN (1) is hereby adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 – Wire Fraud. Sentence will be 

imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

☐ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

 The Court adopts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing

evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the

community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who

set the conditions of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the

defendant is likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under

§ 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination

of whether it has been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c)

why the defendant should not be detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by

clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other

person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This matter shall be referred to the

United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

Signed this 15th day of September, 2023.

________________________________ 

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cr-00104-X Document 49 Filed 09/15/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 103
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 262

To express the sense of the Congress that marinas should not be treated

as offshore facilities for purposes of financial responsibility requirements

of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 28, 1994

Mr. GEJDENSON submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Merchant Marine and Fisheries and

Public Works and Transportation

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Congress that marinas should

not be treated as offshore facilities for purposes of financial responsibility requirements of the Oil Pollution Act

of 1990.

Whereas the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 was enacted in part

in response to the EXXON VALDEZ oil spill, which discharged approximately 11,000,000 gallons of crude oil

into Prince William Sound, Alaska;

Whereas that Act was enacted to prevent similar disasters in

the future and to ensure that companies transporting and

drilling for oil had sufficient financial resources, insurance, or other means to pay for comprehensive cleanup

and environmental restoration in response to discharges

of oil into navigable waters;
2

•HCON 262 IH

Whereas that Act required offshore facilities which could pollute navigable waters of the United States to provide

proof of financial responsibility of at least $150,000,000;

Whereas marinas sell gasoline and diesel fuel only, and in fiscal year 1993 reported only 64 gasoline and diesel fuel

spills nationwide which resulted in the discharge of a

total of 9,642 gallons of gasoline and fuel oil;

Whereas marinas do not have the capital to self-insure or receive letters of credit for $150,000,000 and insurance

policies are unavailable to them for that amount; and

Whereas requiring marinas to demonstrate $150,000,000 in

financial responsibility could drive many of them out of

business with subsequent negative impacts on their owners and employees, boaters, and coastal residents: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) marinas should not be treated as offshore

4 facilities for the purposes of section 1016 of the Oil

5 Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2716); and

6 (2) any regulations under that Act that require

7 offshore facilities to demonstrate $150,000,000 in fi8 nancial responsibility should not apply to marinas.

Æ
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 The
        undersigned, Thomas C. Shields, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
        Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Quarterly
        Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
        May 7, 2007
 By:
              /s/
                  Thomas C. ShieldsThomas
                  C. ShieldsExecutive
                  Vice Presidentand
                  Chief Financial Officer
 
  This
        certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated
        by
        reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act
        of
        1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
        by reference.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained
        by
        ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
        its
        staff upon request.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 473 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3572 

[Report No. 113–633] 

To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 

System units in North Carolina. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2013 

Mr. MCINTYRE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 1, 2014 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on November 21, 2013] 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3572 RH

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal 

Barrier Resources System units in North Carolina. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3572 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL 

4 BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAPS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The maps subtitled ‘‘Lea Island 

6 Complex L07’’; ‘‘Wrightsville Beach Unit L08, Masonboro 

7 Island Unit L09’’; and ‘‘Masonboro Island Unit L09’’, in8 cluded in the set of maps entitled ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal 

9 Barrier Resources System’’ referred to in section 4(a) of the 

10 Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and re11 lating to certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 

12 System units in North Carolina, are hereby replaced by 

13 other maps relating to the units entitled ‘‘Lea Island Com14 plex L07’’; ‘‘Wrightsville Beach Unit L08, Masonboro Is15 land Unit L09’’; and ‘‘Masonboro Island Unit L09’’, respec16 tively, and dated March 12, 2014. 

17 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

18 keep the replacement maps referred to in subsection (a) on 

19 file and available for inspection in accordance with section 

20 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 

21 3503(b)). 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 473 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3572 

[Report No. 113–633] 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee 

Carolina. Coastal Barrier Resources System units in North 

DECEMBER 1, 2014 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of Entrust  Financial  Services,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Arnold P. Kling, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ Arnold P. Kling
--------------------------
Arnold P. Kling
President
March 30, 2006

[A signed  original of this  certification  has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.]
# Puget Sound 8

- Hour Ozone

110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan

A ppendix

Puget Sound Clean Air Agency

1904 3 rd Ave, Ste 105

, Seattle, WA 98101

Ma y 2007

# Contents

Puget Sound Clean Air Agency. Regulation I, Section 8.06 and Regulation II, Sec tion 2.10.

Seattle, WA: 19 December 2002.

Puget Sound Clean Air Agency. "Ozone Summer Day Emission Inventories" spreadsheet.

Seattle, WA: 2 May 2007. [Ozone Summer Day Emission Inventories.xls]

Lamb, Brian et al. of Washington State University; Sally Otterson et al. of Washington State

Department of Ecology and Naydene Maykut of Puget Sound Clean Air Agency. Ozone

Modeling for Maintenance Plan Revision for Puget Sound in Western Washington.

Pullman, Lacey and Seattle, WA: 15 October 2001.

Lamb, Bria n et al. of Washington State University; Sally Otterson et al. of Washington State

Department of Ecology and Kathy Himes et al. of Puget Sound Clean Air Agency.

Modeling Analysis of Future Emission Scenarios for Ozone Impacts in the Puget Sound

Area. Pul lman, Lacey and Seattle, WA: August 2006.

Anderson, John

, of Puget Sound Clean Air Agency. "2002 Emission Inventory Appendix

-- Seasonal" spreadsheet. Seattle, WA : 1 May 2007.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 170

Directing the President pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution

to remove United States Armed Forces from Somalia by January 31, 1994.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 22, 1993

Mr. GILMAN (for himself and Mr. SPENCE) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the President pursuant to section 5(c) of the War

Powers Resolution to remove United States Armed

Forces from Somalia by January 31, 1994.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. FINDING THAT THE UNITED STATES ARMED

4 FORCES IN SOMALIA ARE ENGAGED IN HOS5 TILITIES.

6 For purposes of sections 5(c) and 7 of the War Pow7 ers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544(c) and 1546), the Con8 gress finds that the United States Armed Forces in Soma9 lia are engaged in hostilities without a declaration of war

10 or specific statutory authorization.
2

•HCON 170 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF ARMED FORCES FROM SOMALIA.

2 Pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolu3 tion (50 U.S.C. 1544(c)), the Congress hereby directs the

4 President to remove the United States Armed Forces from

5 Somalia by January 31, 1994.

Æ