alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Organized Village ofKake P.O. Box316 Kake, Alaska 99830-0316 Telephone 907-785-6471 Fax 907-785-4902 I email KeexKwaan@KakeFirstNation.org (FederallyRecognized Tribal Governmentserving the Kake, Alaska area)

Michael Martin Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue. SE Washington, DC 20590 June I, 2012

RE: Essential Air Service Providerfor Kake Alaska Dear Mr. Martin: At the May 29, 2012 meeting ofthe Organized Village of Kake (OVK) IRA Council, support was formally given to the proposal for Air Excursions LLC under the Essential Air Service (EAS) contract serving our community of Kake Alaska. Representatives of OVK were able to gather information from both carriers proposing to serve Kake, and after weighing multiple factors important to our community, the council feels that AirExcursions best meets the needs ofourcommunity. Given our rural location without road access, reliable air service is truly essential to ourday-to-day life and the title ofthe EAS program is aptly named and vitally needed. We trust that your office will work with the selected airline offering services under EAS, so thatthey may do so in a mannerthat not only fulfills Kake's needs, but also allows them to operate in a fiscally viable manners- for that to occur, we thank the U
.S
. Congress and the U.S. Department ofTransportation for the Essential Air Service Subsidy Program that is so critical in rural communities such as Kake, Alaska. In closing, we wish to thank your office for its willingness to work with us and to seek community commenton the Essential Air Service contract award. Ifany additional information orcomments may be needed please advise; and as we move into the future, please keep our tribal government office in the decision process for matters related tothis important service. Sincerely,
Gary E. Williams Executive Director
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28678]



[[Page 66970]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 103000E]


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is 
scheduling a joint public meeting of its Skate Oversight Committee and 
Skate Advisory Panel in November, 2000. Recommendations from these 
committees will be brought to the full Council for formal consideration 
and action, if appropriate.

DATES: The Skate Advisory Panel meeting will held on Thursday, November 
30, 2000, at 8:30 a.m. and the Skate Oversight Committee will join them 
at 9:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Ramada Inn, 936 West Main 
Road, Middletown, RI 02842; telephone: (401) 846-7600

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is the first meeting for the newly-
established Skate Advisory Panel. Advisors will meet to review advisory 
panel policies and elect a chairman. The Skate Committee will join them 
for a workshop on skate species identification. There will be a 
presentation of the final Skate Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation 
(SAFE) Report and development and approval of a scoping document for 
Skate Fishery Management Plan. The committee will review a timeline for 
scoping.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before these groups for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has 
been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to address 
the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Paul J. Howard (see ADDRESSES) at least 5 days 
prior to the meeting dates.

    Dated: November 2, 2000.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 00-28678 Filed 11-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                          US$

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1
<CASH>                                        1,009,085
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   270,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                     25,000
<INVENTORY>                                     859,644
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              2,204,416
<PP&E>                                          989,884
<DEPRECIATION>                                  352,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2,564,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           353,544
<BONDS>                                         180,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         26,515
<OTHER-SE>                                    2,004,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2,564,461
<SALES>                                         647,469
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                672,346
<CGS>                                           310,282
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 1,105,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14,425
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (458,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (447,872)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (447,872)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.17)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements and
related prospectuses of Internet Security Systems, Inc. listed below of our
report dated February 26, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Internet Security Systems, Inc. included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003:

         Registration Statement No. 333-54670 on Form S-8 (1995 Stock Incentive
         Plan (Amended and Restated as of May 24, 2000), 1999 Employee Stock
         Purchase Plan, 1999 International Stock Purchase Plan)

         Registration Statement No. 333-53279 on Form S-8 (Restated 1995 Stock
         Incentive Plan)

         Registration Statement No. 333-89563 on Form S-8 (Internet Security
         Systems Inc. 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, 1999 Employee Stock Purchase
         Plan, 1999 International Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Netrex, Inc.
         1998 Stock Plan)

         Registration Statement No. 333-62658 on Form S-8 (1999 Network ICE
         Stock Option Plan, Internet Security Systems Inc. 1995 Stock Incentive
         Plan, 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1999 International Employee
         Stock Purchase Plan, Netrex, Inc. 1998 Stock Plan)

         Registration Statement No. 333-100954 on Form S-8 (vCIS, Inc. 2001
         Stock Plan, Internet Security Systems, Inc. Restated 1995 Stock
         Incentive Plan (as amended and restated as of May 29, 2002), Internet
         Security Systems, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Internet
         Security Systems, Inc. 1999 International Stock Purchase Plan)


                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 9, 2004
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01386]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Montana Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that an orientation and 
planning meeting of the Montana Advisory Committee to the Commission 
will convene at 1 p.m. (MDT) on Thursday, February 12, 2015, in the 
Community Room of the Billings Public Library, 510 North Broadway, 
Billings, MT 59101. The purpose of the orientation meeting is to inform 
the newly appointed Committee members about the rules of operation of 
Federal advisory committees and to select additional officers, as 
determined by the Committee. The purpose of the planning meeting is to 
discuss potential topics that the Committee may wish to study.
    Persons who desire additional information may contact the Rocky 
Mountain Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 1961 Stout 
Street, Suite 13-201, Denver, CO 80294, phone 303-866-1040 and fax 303-
866-1050, or email to Evelyn Bohor at ebohor@usccr.gov.
    Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Rocky 
Mountain Regional Office at least 10 working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, as they become available, both 
before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the word of this 
advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office at the 
above phone number, email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provision of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated: January 22, 2015.
David Mussatt,
Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2015-01386 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-139-X

§

KEIMEION JONTESE CLEMONS-RUSK (1) §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, 

the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United 

States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in 

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by 

the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and KEIMEION JONTESE CLEMONS-RUSK (1)

is hereby adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 922(j) and 924(a)(2) – Possession of a Stolen Firearm. Sentence will 

be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

⌧ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court adopts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if 

released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set 

the conditions of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the 

defendant is likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 

3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of 

whether it has been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the 

defendant should not be detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This matter shall be referred to the United States 

Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

Signed this 28th day of August 2023.

________________________________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cr-00139-X Document 40 Filed 08/28/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 69
#### BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN INS. DEPT. OF CLEVELAND, OHIO, v. GREEN.

No. A-156.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Oct. 11, 1944.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 8, 1944.

Marvin B. Simpson and Robert Harrison, both of Fort Worth, for plaintiff in error.

Martin, Moore & Brewster and Harris Brewster, all of Fort Worth, for defendant in error.

BREWSTER, Commissioner.

Cornelius Green, respondent sued Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen Insurance Department of Cleveland, Ohio, petitioner, on a health and accident insurance policy to recover certain benefits for total and permanent disability suffered from a heart attack. On a jury verdict the trial court rendered judgment for Green for the claimed benefits plus the statutory 12 per cent penalty and attorney’s fees. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment. 179 S.W.2d 337.

Petitioner is an incorporated fraternal benefit society, organized under the laws of Ohio. At the several times in question it was doing business in Texas, but it had filed no reports and had secured no permit to do business in Texas as required of fraternal benefit societies by Arts. 4820 to 4859, R.S. 1925, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. Arts. 4820 to 4859. Green contends that this failure makes petitioner amenable to Art. 5043, ibid., and the other general insurance laws of Texas. Petitioner contends that Arts. 4831 and 4857, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stat., exempt it from the requirements of Arts. 4820 to 4859, supra, because it insures only persons engaged in a hazardous occupation.

Petitioner alleged that Green made certain false representations in his application for the policy which avoided it, under the constitution and by-laws of the brotherhood. The effect of the jury findings was that these representations were immaterial and contributed nothing to the disability for which Green seeks recovery. So if Art. 5043, supra, applies Green is entitled to recover. Otherwise, the judgment must be for petitioner.

We have this day held, in Railway Mail Mutual Benefit Association v. Henry, Tex.Sup., 182 S.W.2d 798, that fraternal benefit societies insuring only persons engaged in hazardous occupations are not amenable to Arts. 4820 to 4857, supra, and that, therefore, failure to comply with the requirements of those articles does not render them amenable to Art. 5043 and the other general insurance statutes of this State. In that opinion Judge Smedley discusses the question in detail, so it is unnecessary to write at length here.

Whether material or not to the risk, the representations were warranties, and since at least some of them were admittedly untrue, they avoided the policy. Kansas Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Pinson, 94 Tex. 553, 63 S.W. 531; Carrizales v. W. O. W. Life Ins. Soc., 140 Tex. 259, 167 S.W.2d 509.

*805The judgments of both courts below are reversed and judgment is here rendered for the petitioner.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
1

The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-4180

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Daren Hill, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: December 12, 2005

Filed: January 25, 2006 

___________

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Daren Hill pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. The

Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) recommended that Hill be sentenced as an

armed career criminal under § 4B1.4(a) of the federal sentencing guidelines because

he had at least three prior convictions for violent felonies or serious drug offenses.

The district court1

 adopted the recommendations of the PSR, found that the applicable

sentencing range was 188–235 months, and sentenced Hill to 200 months in prison

and five years of supervised release. Hill appeals his sentence, and we affirm. 
-2-

Hill first argues that the district court erred in sentencing him as an armed

career criminal because he did not admit, nor did a jury determine beyond a

reasonable doubt, that his prior convictions were violent felonies or serious drug

offenses. We have consistently rejected this argument and held that the

characterization of prior convictions is a legal question outside the purview of the

Sixth Amendment. United States v.Turnbough, 425 F.3d 1112, 1114 (8th Cir. 2005);

United States v. Marcussen, 403 F.3d 982, 984 (8th Cir. 2005). 

Next, Hill argues that the district court erred in sentencing him under a

mandatory guidelines scheme and that the case should be remanded for resentencing.

Hill is correct that the district court erred in applying the guidelines as mandatory.

United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). Because Hill preserved this Booker

argument by arguing Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), in the district

court, we review for harmless error. United States v. Haidley, 400 F.3d 642, 644 (8th

Cir. 2005). We have held that mandatory application of the guidelines is harmless

error when the district court had the discretion to impose a lesser sentence but instead

sentenced the defendant in the middle of the sentencing range. United States v.

Millot, slip op. (8th Cir. Jan. 9, 2006); see also United States v. Perez-Ramirez, 415

F.3d 876, 878 (8th Cir. 2005). That is the case here, because the district court

sentenced Hill to 200 months’ imprisonment and five years’ supervised release when

it could have sentenced him to 188 months’ imprisonment under the mandatory

guidelines. 

The judgment is affirmed.

_____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00155-X

§

FILIBERTO ORTIZ-SANCHEZ (1) §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of 

Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of 

the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of 

service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the 

Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and FILIBERTO ORTIZSANCHEZ (1) is hereby adjudged guilty of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) – Illegal Reentry After Removal from the 

United States. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

 The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court adopts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing 

evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who 

set the conditions of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the 

defendant is likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under 

§ 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination 

of whether it has been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) 

why the defendant should not be detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by 

clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This matter shall be referred to the 

United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

Signed this 19th day of September, 2022.

________________________________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cr-00155-X Document 27 Filed 09/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 36