alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

SHELA B. ACOSTA § 

§ 

vs. § 

§ 

ARLINGTON HOUSING AUTHORITY § 

CIVIL NO. 4:22-CV-233-P 

ORDER RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL 

AND RETURNING CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE 

On March 28, 2022,pro se Plaintiff Shela B. Acosta filed an Emergency Injunction Motion 

to Compel [doc. l]. Thereafter, on May 24, 2022, the Court entered an Order [doc. 11] directing 

Plaintiff to file, no later than June 7, 2022, a Complaint that meets the requirements of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court's Local Rules. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has 

wholly failed to comply with the Comt's May 24, 2022, Order. Consequently, the Court 

RECOMMENDS that the above-styled and numbered cause be DISMISSED for failing to 

comply with the Court's Order. 

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT TO PROPOSED 

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION 

AND CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO OBJECT 

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(6 )(I), each party to this action has the right to serve and file specific 

written objections in the United States District Court to the United States Magistrate .Judge's 

proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation within fourteen ( 14) days after the party has 

been served with a copy of this document. The United States District Judge need only make a de 

nova determination of those portions of the United States Magistrate Judge's proposed findings, 

conclusions and recommendation to which specific objection is timely made. See 28 U.S.C. § 

636(6)(1). Failure to file, by the date stated above, a specific written objection to a proposed 

Case 4:22-cv-00233-P Document 12 Filed 06/09/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 23
factual finding or legal conclusion will bar a party, except upon grounds of plain error or manifest 

injustice, from attacking on appeal any such proposed factual findings and legal conclusions 

accepted by the United States District Judge. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass 'n, 79 F.3d 

1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en bane), superseded by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(l) (extending time to file objections from ten to fourteen days). 

ORDER 

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636, it is hereby ORDERED that each party is granted until June 23, 

2022, to serve and file written objections to the United States Magistrate Judge's proposed 

findings, conclusions and recommendation. It is further ORDERED that if objections are filed 

and the opposing party chooses to file a response, the response shall be filed within seven (7) days 

of the filing date of the objections. 

It is fm1her ORDERED that the above-styled and numbered action, previously referred to 

the United States Magistrate Judge for findings, conclusions and recommendation, be and hereby 

is returned to the docket of the United States District Judge. 

SIGNED June 9, 2022. 

. CURETON 

TATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 4:22-cv-00233-P Document 12 Filed 06/09/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 24
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3494 

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to the establishment 

of performance measures for the highway safety improvement program, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2013 

Mr. BLUMENAUER (for himself, Mr. COBLE, Mr. MCCAUL, and Mr. DEFAZIO) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to 

the establishment of performance measures for the highway safety improvement program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3494 IH

1 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF PERFORMANCE MEAS2 URES FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT 

3 PROGRAM. 

4 Section 150(c)(4)(B) of title 23, United States Code, 

5 is amended by inserting ‘‘for both motorized and non6 motorized transportation’’ before the period at the end. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28898]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Board of Scientific Counselors, National Center for Infectious 
Diseases: Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following committee meeting.
    Name: Board of Scientific Counselors, National Center for 
Infectious Diseases (NCID).
    Times and Dates: 9 a.m.-5:45 p.m., December 7, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-
2:30 p.m., December 8, 2000.
    Place: CDC, Roybal Building 17 Conference Room, 1600 Clifton 
Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30333.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available.
    Purpose: The Board of Scientific Counselors, NCID, provides 
advice and guidance to the Director, CDC, and Director, NCID, in the 
following areas: program goals and objectives; strategies; program 
organization and resources for infectious disease prevention and 
control; and program priorities.
    Matters to be Discussed: Agenda items will include:

1. Opening Session: NCID Update
2. CDC Facilities Master Plan, Fort Collins, Colorado
3. Program Update: Patient Safety and Quality Care
4. Issue Updates
    a. NCID Research Agenda
    b. Planning and Communication Strategies
    c. Global Infectious Disease Strategic Plan
5. Tour of Roybal Building 17
6. Breakout groups on Issue Updates (Item 4, a-c above)
7. Program Update: West Nile Virus
8. Breakout Group Report/Discussion: NCID Research Agenda
9. Breakout Group Report/Discussion: Planning and Communication 
Strategies
10. Breakout Group Report/Discussion: Global Infectious Disease 
Strategic Plan
11. Late Breakers: Scientific Outbreak Reports
12. Discussions and Recommendations

    Other agenda items include announcements/introductions; follow-
up on actions recommended by the Board May 2000; consideration of 
future directions, goals, and recommendations.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Written comments are welcome and should be received by the 
contact person listed below prior to the opening of the meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Diane S. Holley, Office of the 
Director, NCID, CDC, Mailstop C-20, 1600 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30333, email [email protected]; telephone 404/639-0078.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services office has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: November 6, 2000.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control 
and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 00-28898 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```
|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History: Annual                                        
|View History: Annual                                        
|View History:                                               
|                                                            
|U.S. Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Barge (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                            
|                                                            
|U.S. Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Barge (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         | 193,247 | 199,363 | 211,703 | 220,502 | 204,409 | 146,935 | 165,023 | 157,199 | 166,951
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 145,979 | 149,062 | 173,129 | 166,719 | 161,324 | NA      | 95,408  | NA      | 131,453 | 136,328
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 186,025 | 184,937 | 180,413 | 204,031 | 165,305 | 164,248 | 171,734 | 166,471 | 159,789 | 154,773
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 148,206 | 151,098 | 231,664 | 345,860 | 339,534 | 282,923 | 240,643 | 222,490 | 204,376 | 217,610
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 153,871 | 153,327 | 183,408 | 159,236 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28955]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION


Agency Report Forms Under OMB Review

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

[Notice 00-135]

ACTION: Notice of Agency Report Forms Under OMB Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of 
its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information 
collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13; 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This information is used to 
determine whether the requested license should be granted.

DATES: Written comments and recommendations on the proposal for the 
collection of information should be received within 60 days of this 
notice.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Mr. Brian Dunbar, Code 
PM, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 
20546. All comments will become a matter of public record and will be 
summarized in NASA's request for OMB approval.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carmela Simonson, Office of the 
Chief Information Officer, (202) 358-1223.

Reports

    Title: Voluntary Response Survey of NASA Internet Customers
    OMB Number: 2700-.
    Type of review: New.
    Need and Uses: NASA is seeking input from Internet users that they 
will use to redesign the NASA Home Page, the NASA-wide Search Engine 
and other Internet offerings so that the NASA Web is more customer-
focused and provides users with the information they are seeking more 
quickly.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Number of Respondents: 100.
    Responses Per Respondent: 4.
    Annual Responses: 400.
    Hours Per Request: 15 min.
    Annual Burden Hours: 100.
    Frequency of Report: quarterly.

Dr. David B. Nelson,
Deputy Chief Information Officer, Office of the Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-28955 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1708

KENNETH RINGO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORMAN Y. MINETA, Secretary, United States

Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation

Administration), in his official capacity and

his officer, agents and successors,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-01-1243-A)

Submitted: November 20, 2002 Decided: December 3, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Ringo, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Celia Ballow, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Ringo appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment in favor of Appellee denying his claims under

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A.

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2002). We affirm. 

We review an award of summary judgment de novo. Higgins v.

E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir. 1988).

Summary judgment is appropriate only if there are no genuine issues

of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a

matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett,

477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986). The evidence is viewed in the light

most favorable to the non-moving party. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby,

Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986).

With these standards in mind, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court, stated from the bench following a full hearing.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### AKINS v. STATE.

No. 22664.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 20, 1943.

Baskett & Parks, of Dallas, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The record is before us without notice of appeal. We have no jurisdiction to consider any matter presented in the case.

The appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT
      32.2








STATEMENT
      OF EDWARD W. WILHELM,


SENIOR
      VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF BORDERS GROUP, INC.


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Edward
      W. Wilhelm, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 22, 2005,
      of Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
      that
      the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Borders
      Group, Inc.





Date:
      November 23, 2005





/s/
      EDWARD W. WILHELM


Edward
      W.
      Wilhelm


Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Borders
      Group, Inc.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Borders Group, Inc. and will be retained by Borders Group, Inc. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 245

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives commending Israel

and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) for signing an historic

agreement in Cairo on May 4, 1994.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1994

Mr. KNOLLENBERG (for himself, Mr. PENNY, Mr. RAHALL, Ms. DANNER, and

Mr. BONIOR) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives commending Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) for signing an historic agreement in Cairo

on May 4, 1994.

Whereas on October 30, 1991, a peace conference was convened by the United States and the former Soviet Union

in Madrid, Spain, for the purpose of launching direct bilateral and multilateral negotiations designed to lead to

a comprehensive peace settlement in the Middle East;

Whereas the historic Declaration of Principles on Interim

Self-Government Arrangements was signed by Israel and

the Palestine Liberation Organization and witnessed by

the United States and the Russian Federation at the

White House on September 13, 1993; and
2

•HCON 245 IH

Whereas Israel and the PLO have been engaged for 8 months

in extensive negotiations over the implementation of the

Declaration of Principles which have culminated in the

Cairo Agreement: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) commends the Government of Israel and the

4 Palestine Liberation Organization for reaching their

5 historic agreement that will pave the way for Pal6 estinian self-rule in the Gaza Strip and the Jericho

7 area;

8 (2) encourages all parties to the Middle East

9 peace process to resume bilateral negotiations and

10 work vigorously in the pursuit of a comprehensive,

11 just, and lasting peace;

12 (3) calls upon the Administration to more ac13 tively engage the United States as a full partner in

14 the Middle East negotiating process;

15 (4) urges Israel and the Palestine Liberation

16 Organization to move quickly to implement the pro17 visions of the Declaration of Principles on Interim

18 Self-Government Arrangements to get to final status

19 issues, including Jerusalem, refugees, settlements,

20 security arrangements, borders, relations and co21 operation with other neighbors, and other issues of

22 common interest ‘‘as soon as possible, but no later
3

•HCON 245 IH

1 than the beginning of the third year of the interim

2 period,’’ as stipulated in the Declaration of Prin3 ciples; and

4 (5) urges the Administration, in cooperation

5 with the world community through the mechanism of

6 relevant international financial agencies and institu7 tions, including the World Bank, to provide aid to

8 facilitate the establishment of Palestinian self-gov9 ernment in the Gaza Strip and Jericho area, in ac10 cordance with the provisions of the Israeli-PLO

11 agreement.

Æ
#### HAMM v. STATE.

No. 22755.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 9, 1944.

Gray Browne, of Abilene, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The record is before us without bills of exception and without statement of facts. The procedure is regular. Nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 1 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 1

   Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Office of Personnel 
Management should provide certain vocational rehabilitation services in 
 its administration of the civil service disability retirement program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

Mrs. Collins of Illinois submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Office of Personnel 
Management should provide certain vocational rehabilitation services in 
 its administration of the civil service disability retirement program.

Whereas individuals under the civil service disability retirement program should 
        have the option of resuming useful employment after their careers are 
        interrupted by severe injury;
Whereas vocational rehabilitation methods, such as selective job referral, 
        retraining, and career counseling, have progressed to the point where 
        they represent cost-effective, as well as humane, alternatives to 
        continued dependence on disability benefits;
Whereas the former Federal policy favoring the rehiring of injured employees has 
        been curtailed because of recent hiring ceilings; and
Whereas vocational rehabilitation is used throughout the insurance industry as 
        well as under Federal workmen's compensation law, and should be a part 
        of the Office of Personnel Management's functions in administering the 
        civil service disability retirement program: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the Office of Personnel 
Management should identify those individuals under the disability 
retirement provisions of title 5, United States Code, who could benefit 
from vocational rehabilitation and should advise such annuitants of the 
various vocational rehabilitation programs available to them, including 
those administered by the United States Employment Service and State 
vocational education divisions.

                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

I, Sumito Mulchandani, certify that:

 

(a)                                 A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)                                 To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.

 
| Dated March 21, 2017 |                   |
|----------------------|------------------------|
|                 |                   |
|                 | /s/ Sumito Mulchandani |
|                 |                   | Sumito Mulchandani |
|                 |                   | Assistant Treasurer of |
|                 |                   | Ford Motor Credit Company LLC, |
|                 |                   | as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner |
|                 |                   | Trust 2015-A |

 

----