Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices 67445

SUMMARY: The FAA is considering a

proposal that a portion of the airport

(approximately 2 acres located on

Sutton Street along the southwest corner

of the airport) is not needed for

aeronautical use, as shown on the

Airport Layout Plan. There appear to be

no impacts to the airport by allowing

the airport the use of the land under a

45 year lease, for public self storage

units. Approximately 20 percent of the

land was acquired by the airport under

FAA Project No. 9–19–007–0804 (parcel

9 and a portion of parcel 12).

In accordance with section 47107(h)

of title 49, United States Code, the

notice is required to be published in the

Federal Register 30 days before

modifying the land-use assurance that

requires the property to be used for an

aeronautical purpose.

The purpose of this lease is to make

use of surplus land to generate needed

revenue for the operations and

maintenance of the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before December 11, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this

application may be mailed or delivered

to the FAA at the following address: Mr.

William Cronan, Special Projects

Officer, Federal Aviation

Administration, Airports Division, 12

New England Executive Park,

Burlington, Massachusetts 01803.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William Cronan, Special Projects

Officer, 12 New England Executive Park,

Burlington, Massachusetts 01803.

Telephone number 781–238–7610/Fax

number 781–238–7608. Documents

reflecting the FAA action may be

reviewed at the 16 New England

Executive Park, Burlington,

Massachusetts 01803 or at the Lawrence

Municipal Airport 492 Sutton Street,

North Andover, Massachusetts 01845.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

notice announces that the FAA intends

to authorize the release of the subject

airports property at the Lawrence

Municipal Airport, North Andover,

Massachusetts. The disposition of

proceeds from the leasing of the airport

property will be in accordance with

FAA’s policy and procedures

concerning the use of the airport

revenue, published in the Federal

Register on February 16, 1999.

Issued in Burlington Massachusetts on

October 30, 2000.

Vincent A. Scarano,

Manager, Airports Division, New England

Region.

[FR Doc. 00–28732 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Index of Administrator’s Decisions and

Orders in Civil Penalty Actions;

Publication

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of publication.

SUMMARY: This notice constitutes the

required quarterly publication of an

index of the Administrator’s decisions

and orders in civil penalty cases. This

publication represents the quarter

ending on September 30, 2000. This

publication ensures that the agency is in

compliance with statutory indexing

requirements.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James S. Dillman, Assistant Chief

Counsel for Litigation (AGC–400),

Federal Aviation Administration, 400

7th Street, SW., Suite PL 200–A,

Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202)

366–4118.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Administrative Procedure Act requires

Federal agencies to maintain and make

available for public inspection and

copying current indexes containing

identifying information regarding

materials required to be made available

or published. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2). In a

notice issued on July 11, 1990, and

published in the Federal Register (55

FR 29148; July 17, 1990), the FAA

announced the public availability of

several indexes and summaries that

provide identifying information about

the decisions and orders issued by the

Administrator under the FAA’s civil

penalty assessment authority and the

rules of practice governing hearings and

appeals of civil penalty actions. 14 CFR

Part 13, Subpart G.

The FAA maintains an index of the

Administrator’s decisions and orders in

civil penalty actions organized by order

number and containing identifying

information about each decision or

order. The FAA also maintains a

cumulative subject-matter index and

digests organized by order number. The

indexes are published on a quarterly

basis (i.e., January, April, July, and

October.)

The FAA first published these

indexes and digests for all decisions and

orders issued by the Administrator

through September 30, 1990. 55 FR

45984; October 31, 1990. The FAA

announced in that notice that only the

subject-matter index would be

published cumulatively and that the

order number index would be noncumulative. The FAA announced in a

later notice that the order number

indexes published in January would

reflect all of the civil penalty decisions

for the previous year. 58 FR 5044; 1/19/

93.

The previous quarterly publications of

these indexes have appeared in the

Federal Register as follows:

Dates of quarter Federal Register publication

11/1/89–9/30/90 .... 55 FR 45984; 10/31/90.

10/1/90–12/31/90 .. 56 FR 44886; 2/6/91.

1/1/91–3/31/91 ...... 56 FR 20250; 5/2/91.

4/1/91–6/30/91 ...... 56 FR 31984; 7/12/91.

7/1/91–9/30/91 ...... 56 FR 51735; 10/15/91.

10/1/91–12/31/91 .. 57 FR 2299; 1/21/92.

1/1/92–3/31/92 ...... 57 FR 12359; 4/9/92.

4/1/92–6/30/92 ...... 57 FR 32825; 7/23/92.

7/1/92–9/30/92 ...... 57 FR 48255; 10/22/92.

10/1/92–12/31/92 .. 58 FR 5044; 1/19/93.

1/1/93–3/31/93 ...... 58 FR 21199; 4/19/93.

4/1/93–6/30/93 ...... 58 FR 42120; 8/6/93.

7/1/93–9/30/93 ...... 58 FR 58218; 10/29/93.

10/1/93–12/31/93 .. 59 FR 5466; 2/4/94.

1/1/94–3/31/94 ...... 59 FR 22196; 4/29/94.

4/1/94–6/30/94 ...... 59 FR 39618; 8/3/94.

7/1/94–12/31/94 .... 60 FR 4454; 1/23/95.

1/1/95–3/31/95 ...... 60 FR 19318; 4/17/95.

4/1/95–6/30/95 ...... 60 FR 36854; 7/18/95.

7/1/95–9/30/95 ...... 60 FR 53228; 10/12/95.

10/1/95–12/31/95 .. 61 FR 1972; 1/24/96.

1/1/96–3/31/96 ...... 61 FR 16955; 4/18/96.

4/1/96–6/30/96 ...... 61 FR 37526; 7/18/96.

7/1/96–9/30/96 ...... 61 FR 54833; 10/22/96.

10/1/96–12/31/96 .. 62 FR 2434; 1/16/97.

1/1/97–3/31/97 ...... 62 FR 24533; 5/2/97.

4/1/97–6/30/97 ...... 62 FR 38339; 7/17/97.

7/1/97–9/30/97 ...... 62 FR 53856; 10/16/97.

10/1/97–12/31/97 .. 63 FR 3373; 1/22/98.

1/1/98–3/31/98 ...... 63 FR 19559; 4/20/98.

4/1/98–6/30/98 ...... 63 FR 37914; 7/14/98.

7/1/98–9/30/98 ...... 63 FR 57729; 10/28/98.

10/1/98–12/31/98 .. 64 FR 1855; 1/12/99.

1/1/99–3/31/99 ...... 64 FR 24690; 5/7/99.

4/1/99–6/30/99 ...... 64 FR 43236; 8/9/99.

7/1/99–9/30/99 ...... 64 FR 58879; 11/1/99.

10/1/99–12/31/99 .. 65 FR 1654; 1/11/00.

1/1/00–3/31/00 ...... 65 FR 35973; 6/6/00.

4/1/00–6/30/00 ...... 65 FR 47557; 8/2/00.

The civil penalty decisions and

orders, and the indexes and digests are

available in FAA offices. Also, the

Administrator’s civil penalty decisions

have been published by commercial

publishers (Hawkins Publishing

Company and Clark Boardman

Callaghan) and are available on

computer on-line services (Westlaw,

LEXIS, Compuserve and FedWorld).

A list of the addresses of the FAA

offices where the civil penalty decisions

may be reviewed and information

regarding these commercial publications

and computer databases are provided at

the end of this notice. Information

regarding the accessibility of materials

filed in recently initiated civil penalty

cases in FAA civil penalty cases at the

DOT Docket and over the Internet also

appears at the end of this notice.

67446 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices

Civil Penalty Actions—Orders Issued

by the Administrator

Order Number Index

(Includes all decisions and orders

issued by the Administrator between

July 1, 2000, and September 30, 2000.)

2000–15 David E. Everson

8/7/2000—CP99WA0002, DMS No.

FAA–1999–5570

2000–16 Warbelow’s Air Ventures,

Inc.

8/8/2000—CP97AL0012

2000–17 Howard Gotbetter

8/11/2000—CP98EA0051, DMS No.

FAA–1998–4691

2000–18 California Helitech

8/11/2000—CP98WP0035

2000–19 James J. Horner

8/11/2000—CP99NM0004

2000–20 Phillips Building Supply

8/11/2000—CP99SO0024, DMS No.

FAA–1999–5816

2000–21 Daniel A. Martinez

8/24/2000—CP99NM0012, DMS No.

FAA–1999–5984

Civil Penalty Actions—Orders Issued by the Administrator

Subject Matter Index

(Current as of September 30, 2000)

Administrative Law Judges—Power and Authority:

Continuance of hearing .................................................................... 91–11 Continental Airlines: 92–29 Haggland.

Credibility findings .......................................................................... 90–21 Carroll; 92–3 Park; 93–17 Metcalf; 94–3 Valley Air; 94–4

Northwest Aircraft Rental; 95–25 Conquest; 95–26 Hereth; 97–20

Werle; 97–30 Emery Worldwide Airlines; 97–32 Florida Propeller;

98–18 General Aviation; 99–6 Squire; 2000–3 Warbelow’s 2000–

17 Gotbetter.

Default Judgment .............................................................................. 91–11 Continental Airlines; 92–47 Cornwall; 94–8 Nunez; 94–22

Harkins; 94–28 Toyota; 95–10 Diamond; 97–28 Continental Airlines; 97–33 Rawlings; 98–13 Air St. Thomas.

Discovery .......................................................................................... 89–6 American Airlines; 91–17 KDS Aviation; 91–54 Alaska Airlines; 92–46 Sutton-Sautter; 93–10 Costello.

Expert Testimony ............................................................................. 94–21 Sweeney.

Granting extensions of time ............................................................. 90–27 Gabbert.

Hearing location ............................................................................... 92–50 Cullop.

Hearing request ................................................................................. 93–12 Langton; 94–6 Strohl; 94–27 Larsen; 94–37 Houston; 95–19

Rayner.

Initial Decision ................................................................................. 92–1 Costello; 92–32 Barnhill.

Lateness of ................................................................................. 97–31 Sanford Air; 2000–19 Horner.

Should include requirement to file appeal brief .................... 98–5 Squire.

Jurisdiction:

Generally .................................................................................... 90–20 Degenhardt; 90–33 Cato; 92–1 Costello; 92–32 Barnhill.

After issuance of order assessing civil penalty ....................... 94–37 Houston; 95–19 Rayner; 97–33 Rawlings.

When complaint is withdrawn ................................................ 94–39 Kirola.

Motion for Decision ......................................................................... 92–73 Wyatt; 92–75 Beck; 92–76 Safety Equipment; 93–11 Merkley;

96–24 Horizon; 98–20 Koenig.

No authority to extend due date for late Answer without showing of good cause. (See also Answer).95–28 Atlantic World Airways; 97–18 Robinson; 98–4 Larry’s Flying

Service.

Notice of Hearing ............................................................................. 92–31 Eaddy.

Regulate proceedings ....................................................................... 97–20 Werle.

Sanction ............................................................................................ 90–37 Northwest Airlines; 91–54 Alaska Airlines; 94–22 Harkins;

94–28 Toyota.

Service of law judges by parties ...................................................... 97–18 Robinson.

Vacate initial decision ..................................................................... 90–20 Degenhardt; 92–32 Barnhill; 95–6 Sutton.

Aerial Photography .................................................................................. 95–25 Conquest Helicopters.

Agency Attorney ...................................................................................... 93–13 Medel.

Air Carrier/Aircraft Operator:

Agent/independent contractor of .................................................... 92–70 USAir; 2000–13 Empire Airlines.

Careless or Reckless ......................................................................... 92–48 & 92–70 USAir; 93–18 Westair Commuter.

Duty of care: Non-delegable ............................................................ 92–70 USAir; 96–16 Westair Commuter; 96–24 Horizon; 97–8 Pacific Av. d/b/a Inter-Island Helicopters; 99–12 TWA; 2000–3

Warbelow’s; 2000–13 Empire Airlines.

Employee .......................................................................................... 93–18 Westair Commuter; 97–8 Pacific Av. d/b/a Inter-Island Helicopters; 99–12 TWA; 99–14 Alika Aviation; 2000–1 Gatewood;

2000–3 Warbelow’s.

Ground Security Coordinator, Failure to provide .......................... 96–16 WestAir Commuter.

Intoxicated passenger:

Allowing to board ..................................................................... 98–11 TWA.

Serving alcohol to ..................................................................... 98–11 TWA.

Liability for acts/omissions of employees in scope of employment.98–11 TWA, 99–12 TWA; 99–14 Alika Aviation; 2000–1 Gatewood;

2000–3 Warbelow’s.

Liability for maintenance by independent repair station .............. 2000–13 Empire Airlines.

Use of unqualified pilot ................................................................... 99–15 Blue Ridge; 99–11 Evergreen; 2000–12 Evergreen.

Aircraft Maintenance (See also Airworthiness, Maintenance Manual):

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices 67447

Generally ........................................................................................... 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories; 91–8 Watts Agricultural Aviation;

93–36 & 94–3 Valley Air; 94–38 Bohan; 95–11 Horizon; 96–3

America West Airlines; 97–8 Pacific Av. d/b/a Inter-Island Helicopters; 97–9 Alphin; 97–10 Alphin; 97–11 Hampton; 97–30

Emery Worldwide Airlines; 97–31 Sanford Air; 98–18 General

Aviation; 99–5 Africa Air; 2000–1 Gatewood; 2000–3 Warbelow’s;

2000–13 Empire Airlines; 2000–14 Warbelow’s 2000–18 California

Helitech.

Acceptable methods, techniques, and practices ............................ 96–3 America West Airlines.

After certificate revocation .............................................................. 92–73 Wyatt.

Airworthiness Directive, compliance with ..................................... 96–18 Kilrain; 97–9 Alphin.

Approved data for major repairs ..................................................... 2000–13 Empire Airlines.

Advisory Circular 43.13–1, as amended alone not approved

data.

2000–13 Empire Airlines.

Approved data for an aircraft not necessarily approved for

major repair of another aircraft.

2000–13 Empire Airlines.

DER .................................................................................................... 2000–13 Empire Airlines.

Inspection ......................................................................................... 96–18 Filrain; 97–10 Alphin; 99–14 Alika Aviation.

Major alterations: Failed to prove ................................................... 99–5 Africa Air.

Major/minor repairs ......................................................................... 96–3 America West Airlines.

Minimum Equipment List (MEL) .................................................... 94–38 Bohan, 95–11 Horizon; 97–11 Hampton; 97–21 Delta; 97–30

Emery Worldwide Airlines; 2000–3 Warbelow’s.

Operation when maintenance entries not made ............................ 2000–1 Gatewood; 2000–18 California Helitech.

Repairs between required inspections ............................................ 2000–18 California Helitech.

Propellers .......................................................................................... 2000–1 Gatewood.

Aircraft Records:

Aircraft Operation ............................................................................ 91–8 Watts Agricultural Aviation; 2000–1 Gatewood.

Flight and Duty Time ....................................................................... 96–4 South Aero.

Maintenance Records ....................................................................... 91–8 Watts Agricultural Aviation; 94–2 Woodhouse; 97–30 Emery

Worldwide Airlines; 97–31 Sanford Air; 98–18 General Aviation;

2000–1 Gatewood; 2000–3 Warbelow’s; 2000–18 California

Helitech.

Description of maintenance ...................................................... 2000–1 Gatewood.

Squawk sheets ........................................................................... 2000–18 California Helitech.

‘‘Yellow tags’’ ................................................................................... 91–8 Watts Agricultural Aviation.

Aircraft—Weight and Balance (See Weight and Balance)

Airmen:

Airline Transport Pilot certificates requirement in foreign aviation by Part 135 operator.99–11 Evergreen Helicopters; 2000–12 Evergreen.

Altitude deviation ............................................................................ 92–49 Richardson & Shimp.

Careless or Reckless ......................................................................... 91–12 & 91–31 Terry & Menne; 92–8 Watkins; 92–49 Richardson &

Shimp; 92–47 Cornwall; 93–17 Metcalf; 93–29 Sweeney; 96–17

Fenner.

Flight time limitations ..................................................................... 93–11 Merkley.

Flight Time records .......................................................................... 99–7 Premier Jets.

Follow ATC Instruction ................................................................... 91–12 & 91–31 Terry & Menne; 92–8 Watkins; 92–49 Richardson &

Shimp.

Low Flight ......................................................................................... 92–47 Cornwall; 93–17 Metcalf.

Owner’s responsibility ..................................................................... 96–17 Fenner; 2000–1 Gatewood.

Pilots ................................................................................................. 91–12 & 91–31 Terry & Menne; 92–8 Watkins; 92–49 Richardson &

Shimp; 93–17 Metcalf.

See and Avoid .................................................................................. 93–29 Sweeney.

Unqualified for Part 135 flight ........................................................ 99–15 Blue Ridge.

Air Operations Area (AOA):

Air Carrier.

Air Carrier Responsibilities ............................................................. 90–19 Continental Airlines; 91–33 Delta Air Lines; 94–1 Delta Air

Lines.

Airport Operator Responsibilities ................................................... 90–19 Continental Airlines; 91–4 [Airport Operator]; 91–18 [Airport

Operator]; 91–40 [Airport Operator]; 91–41 [Airport Operator]; 91–

58 [Airport Operator]; 96–1 [Airport Operator]; 98–7 LAX.

Badge Display ................................................................................... 91–4 [Airport Operator]; 91–33 Delta Air Lines; 99–1 American Airlines.

Definition of ...................................................................................... 90–19 Continental Airlines; 91–4 [Airport Operator]; 91–58 [Airport

Operator].

Exclusive Areas ................................................................................ 90–19 Continental Airlines; 91–4 [Airport Operator]; 91–58 [Airport

Operator]; 98–7 LAX.

Airport Security Program (ASP):

Compliance with .............................................................................. 91–4 [Airport Operator]; 91–18 [Airport Operator]; 91–40 [Airport

Operator]; 91–41 [Airport Operator]; 91–58 [Airport Operator]; 94–

1 Delta Air Lines; 96–1 [Airport Operator]; 97–23 Detroit Metropolitan; 98–7 LAX; Airport Operator.

Responsibilities ................................................................................ 90–12 Continental Airlines; 91–4 [Airport Operator]; 91–18 [Airport

Operator]; 91–40 [Airport Operator]; 91–41 [Airport Operator]; 91–

58 [Airport Operator]; 96–1 [Airport Operator]; 97–23 Detroit Metropolitan.

Air Traffic Control (ATC):

67448 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices

Error as mitigating factor ................................................................. 91–12 & 91–31 Terry & Menne.

Error as exonerating factor ............................................................... 91–12 & 91–31 Terry & Menne; 92–40 Wendt.

Ground Control ................................................................................. 91–12 Terry & Menne; 93–18 Westair Commuter.

Local Control .................................................................................... 91–12 Terry & Menne.

Tapes & Transcripts ......................................................................... 91–12 Terry & Menne; 92–49 Richardson & Shimp.

Airworthiness .......................................................................................... 91–8 Watts Agricultural Aviation; 92–10 Flight Unlimited; 92–48 &

92–70 USAir; 94–2 Woodhouse; 95–11 Horizon; 96–3 America

West Airlines; 96–18 Kilrain; 94–25 USAir; 97–8 Pacific Av. d/b/a

Inter-Island Helicopters; 97–9 Alphin; 97–10 Alphin; 97–11

Hampton; 97–21 Delta; 97–30 Emery Worldwide Airlines; 97–32

Florida Propeller; 98–18 General Aviation; 99–14 Alika Aviation;

2000–3 Warbelow’s; 2000–13 Empire Airlines; 2000–14

Warbelow’s; 2000–18 California Helitech.

Amicus Curiae Briefs .............................................................................. 90–25 Gabbert.

Answer:

ALJ may not extend due date for late Answer unless good cause

shown.

95–28 Atlantic World Airways; 97–18 Robinson; 97–33 Rawlings;

98–4 Larry’s Flying Service.

Reply to each numbered paragraph in the complaint required .... 98–21 Blankson.

Timeliness of answer ....................................................................... 90–3 Metz; 90–15 Playter; 92–32 Barnhill; 92–47 Cornwall; 92–75

Beck; 92–76 Safety Equipment; 94–5 Grant; 94–29 Sutton; 94–30

Columna; 94–43 Perez; 95–10 Diamond; 95–28 Atlantic World

Airways; 97–18 Robinson; 97–19 Missirlian; 97–33 Rawlings; 97–

38 Air St. Thomas; 98–4 Larry’s Flying Service; 98–13 Air St.

Thomas; 99–8 McDermott; 99–9 Lifeflite Medical Air Transport;

99–16 Dorfman.

Timeliness not at issue once hearing held ..................................... 99–16 Dorfman.

What constitutes ............................................................................... 92–32 Barnhill; 92–75 Beck; 97–19 Missirlian.

Appeals (See also Filing; Timeliness; Mailing Rule):

Briefs, Generally ............................................................................... 89–4 Metz; 91–45 Park; 92–17 Giuffrida; 92–19 Cornwall; 92–39

Beck; 93–24 Steel City Aviation; 93–28 Strohl; 94–23 Perez; 95–13

Kilrain.

Additional Appeal Brief .................................................................. 92–3 Park; 93–5 Wendt; 93–6 Westair Commuter; 93–28 Strohl; 94–

4 Northwest Aircraft; 94–18 Luxemburg; 94–29 Sutton; 97–22

Sanford Air; 97–34 Continental Airlines; 97–38 Air St. Thomas;

98–18 General Aviation; 99–11 Evergreen Helicopter; 2000–7 Martinez; 2000–21 Martinez.

Appeal dismissed as premature ...................................................... 95–19 Rayner.

Appeal dismissed as moot after complaint withdrawn ................. 92–9 Griffin.

Appellate arguments ........................................................................ 92–70 USAir.

Court of Appeals, appeal to (See Federal Courts)

Good Cause for Late-Filed Brief or Notice of Appeal .................... 90–3 Metz; 90–27 Gabbert; 90–39 Hart; 91–10 Graham; 91–24 Esau;

91–48 Wendt; 91–50 & 92–1 Costello; 92–3 Park; 92–17 Giuffrida;

92–39 Beck; 92–41 Moore & Sabre Associates; 92–52 Beck; 92–57

Detroit Metro Wayne Co. Airport; 92–69 McCabe; 93–23 Allen;

93–27 Simmons; 93–31 Allen; 95–2 Meronek; 95–9 Woodhouse;

95–25 Conquest, 97–6 WRA Inc.; 97–7 Stalling; 97–28 Continental; 97–38 Air St. Thomas; 98–1 V. Taylor; 98–13 Air St.

Thomas; 99–4 Warbelow’s Air Ventures; 2000–11 Europex; 2000–

21 Martinez.

Informal Conference: Conduct of, not on appeal ........................... 99–14 Alika Aviation.

Motion to Vacate construed as a brief ............................................ 91–11 Continental Airlines.

Perfecting an Appeal, generally ...................................................... 92–17 Giuffrida; 92–19 Cornwall; 92–39 Beck; 94–23 Perez; 95–13

Kilrain; 96–5 Alphin Aircraft; 98–20 Koenig.

Extension of Time for (good cause for) ................................... 89–8 Thunderbird Accessories; 91–26 Britt Airways; 91–32 Bargen;

91–50 Costello; 93–2 & 93–3 Wendt; 93–24 Steel City Aviation;

93–32 Nunez; 98–5 Squire; 98–15 Squire; 99–3 Justice; 99–4

Warbelow’s Air Ventures.

Failure to ................................................................................... 89–1 Gressani; 89–7 Zenkner; 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories; 90–

35 P. Adams; 90–39 Hart; 91–7 Pardue; 91–10 Graham; 91–20

Bargen; 91–43, 91–44, 91–46 & 91–47 Delta Air Lines; 92–11

Alilin; 92–15 Dillman; 92–18 Bargen; 92–34 Carrell; 92–35 Bay

Land Aviation; 92–36 Southwest Airlines; 92–45 O’Brien; 92–56

Montauk Caribbean Airways; 92–67 USAir; 92–68 Weintraub; 92–

78 TWA; 93–7 Dunn; 93–8 Nunez; 93–20 Smith; 93–23 & 93–31

Allen; 93–34 Castle Aviation; 93–35 Steel City Aviation; 94–12

Bartusiak; 94–24 Page; 94–26 French Aircraft; 94–34 American

International Airways; 94–35 American International Airways;

94–36 American International Airways; 95–4 Hanson; 95–22 &

96–5 Alphin Aircraft; 96–2 Skydiving Center; 96–13 Winslow; 97–

3 [Airport Operator], 97–6 WRA, Inc.; 97–15 Houston & Johnson

County; 97–35 Gordon Air Services; 97–36 Avcon; 97–37 Roush;

98–10 Rawlings; 99–2 Oxygen Systems; 2000–9 Tundra Copters;

2000–10 Johnson.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices 67449

Notice of appeal construed as appeal brief ............................. 92–39 Beck; 94–15 Columna; 95–9 Woodhouse; 95–23 Atlantic

World Airways; 96–20 Missirlian; 97–2 Sanford Air; 98–5 Squire;

98–17 Blue Ridge; 98–23 Instead Balloon Services; 99–3 Justice;

99–8 McDermott; 2000–7 Martinez.

What Constitutes ....................................................................... 90–4 Metz; 90–27 Gabbert; 91–45 Park; 92–7 West; 92–17 Giuffrida;

92–39 Beck; 93–7 Dunn; 94–15 Columna; 94–23 Perez; 94–30

Columna; 95–9 Woodhouse; 95–23 Atlantic World Airways; 96–20

Missirlian; 97–2 Sanford Air.

Service of brief: Fail to serve other party ....................................... 92–17 Giuffrida; 92–19 Cornwall.

Timeliness of Notice of Appeal ....................................................... 90–3 Metz; 90–39 Hart; 91–50 Costello; 92–7 West; 92–69 McCabe;

93–27 Simmons; 95–2 Meronek; 95–9 Woodhouse; 95–15 Alphin

Aviation; 96–14 Midtown Neon Sign Corp.; 97–7 & 97–17 Stallings; 97–28 Continental; 97–38 Air St. Thomas; 98–1 V. Taylor;

98–13 Air St. Thomas; 98–16 Blue Ridge; 98–17 Blue Ridge; 98–

21 Blankson.

Withdrawal of ................................................................................... 89–2 Lincoln-Walker; 89–3 Sittko; 90–4 Nordrum; 90–5 Sussman;

90–6 Dabaghian; 90–7 Steele; 90–8 Jenkins; 90–9 Van Zandt; 90–

13 O’Dell; 90–14 Miller; 90–28 Puleo; 90–29 Sealander; 90–30

Steidinger; 90–34 D. Adams; 90–40 & 90–41 Westair Commuter

Airlines; 91–1 Nestor; 91–5 Jones; 91–6 Lowery; 91–13 Kreamer;

91–14 Swanton; 91–15 Knipe; 91–16 Lopez; 91–19 Bayer; 91–21

Britt Airways; 91–22 Omega Silicone Co.; 91–23 Continental Airlines; 91–25 Sanders; 91–27 Delta Air Lines; 91–28 Continental

Airlines; 91–29 Smith; 91–34 GASPRO; 91–35 M. Graham; 91–36

Howard; 91–37 Vereen; 91–39 America West; 91–42 Pony Express; 91–49 Shields; 91–56 Mayhan; 91–57 Britt Airways; 91–59

Griffin; 91–60 Brinton; 92–2 Koller; 92–4 Delta Air Lines; 92–6

Rothgeb; 92–12 Bertetto; 92–20 Delta Air Lines; 92–21 Cronberg;

92–22, 92–23, 92–24, 92–25, 92–26 & 92–28 Delta Air Lines; 92–

33 Port Authority of NY & NJ; 92–42 Jayson; 92–43 Delta Air

Lines; 92–44 Owens; 92–53 Humble; 92–54 & 92–55 Northwest

Airlines; 92–60 Costello; 92–61 Romerdahl; 92–62 USAir; 92–63

Schaefer; 92–64 & 92–65 Delta Air Lines; 92–66 Sabre Associates

& Moore; 92–79 Delta Air Lines; 93–1 Powell & Co.; 93–4 Harrah;

93–14 Fenske; 93–15 Brown; 93–21 Delta Air Lines; 93–22

Yannotone; 93–26 Delta Air Lines; 93–33 HPH Aviation; 94–9 B &

G Instruments; 94–10 Boyle; 94–11 Pan American Airways; 94–13

Boyle; 94–14 B & G Instruments; 94–16 Ford; 94–33 Trans World

Airlines; 94–41 Dewey Towner; 94–42 Taylor; 95–1 Diamond

Aviation; 95–3 Delta Air Lines; 95–5 Araya; 95–6 Sutton; 95–7

Empire Airlines; 95–20 USAir; 95–21 Faisca; 95–24 Delta Air

Lines; 96–7 Delta Air Lines; 96–8 Empire Airlines; 96–10 USAir;

96–11 USAir, 96–12 USAir; 96–21 Houseal; 97–4 [Airport Operator]; 97–5 WestAir; 97–25 Martin & Jaworski; 97–26 Delta Air

Lines; 97–27 Lock Haven; 97–39 Delta Air Lines; 98–9 Continental Express; 2000–8 USA Jet Airlines; 2000–15 Everson d/b/a

North Valley Helicopters.

Assault (See also Battery, and Passenger Misconduct) ......................... 96–6 Ignatov; 97–12 Mayer; 99–16 Dorfman; 2000–17 Gotbetter.

‘‘Attempt’’ ................................................................................................ 89–5 Schultz.

Attorney Conduct: Obstreperous or Disruptive ..................................... 94–39 Kirola.

Attorney Fees (See EAJA):

Aviation Safety Reporting System .......................................................... 90–39 Hart; 91–12 Terry & Menne; 92–49 Richardson & Shimp.

Baggage Matching .................................................................................... 98–6 Continental; 99–12 TWA.

Balloon (Hot Air) ..................................................................................... 94–2 Woodhouse.

Bankruptcy ............................................................................................... 91–2 Continental Airlines.

Battery (See also Assault and Passenger Misconduct) .......................... 96–6 Ignatov; 97–12 Mayer; 99–16 Dorfman; 2000–27 Gotbetter.

Certificates and Authorizations: Surrender when revoked .................. 92–73 Wyatt.

Civil Air Security National Airport Inspection Program (CASNAIP) .. 91–4 [Airport Operator]; 91–18 [Airport Operator]; 91–40 [Airport

Operator]; 91–41 [Airport Operator]; 91–58 [Airport Operator].

Civil Penalty Amount (See Sanction):

Closing Argument (See Final Oral Argument):

Collateral Estoppel .................................................................................. 91–8 Watts Agricultural Aviation.

Complaint:

Complainant Bound By .................................................................... 90–10 Webb; 91–53 Koller.

No Timely Answer to (See Answer):

Partial Dismissal/Full Sanction ....................................................... 94–19 Pony Express; 94–40 Polynesian Airways.

Staleness (See Stale Complaint Rule):

Statute of Limitations (See Statute of Limitations):

Timeliness of complaint .................................................................. 91–51 Hagwood; 93–13 Medel; 94–7 Hereth; 94–5 Grant.

Withdrawal of ................................................................................... 94–39 Kirola; 95–6 Sutton.

Compliance & Enforcement Program:

(FAA Order No. 2150.3A) ................................................................ 89–5 Schultz; 89–6 American Airlines; 91–38 Esau; 92–5 Delta Air

Lines.

Compliance/Enforcement Bulletin 92–3 ......................................... 96–19 [Air Carrier].

67450 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices

Sanction Guidance Table ................................................................. 89–5 Schultz; 90–23 Broyles; 90–33 Cato; 90–37 Northwest Airlines;

91–3 Lewis; 92–5 Delta Air Lines; 98–18 General Aviation; 2000–

3 Warbelow’s.

Concealment of Weapons (See Weapons Violations):

Consolidation of Cases ............................................................................ 90–12, 90–18 & 90–19 Continental Airlines.

Constitutionality of Regulations (See also Double Jeopardy) ............... 90–12 Continental Airlines; 90–18 Continental Airlines; 90–19 Continental Airlines; 90–37 Northwest Airlines; 96–1 [Airport Operator]; 96–25 USAir; 97–16 Mauna Kea; 97–34 Continental Airlines; 98–6 Continental Airlines; 98–11 TWA; 99–1 American; 99–

12 TWA; 2000–19 Horner.

Continuance of Hearing .......................................................................... 90–25 Gabbert; 92–29 Haggland.

Corrective Action (See Sanction):

Counsel:

Leave to withdraw ............................................................................ 97–24 Gordon.

No right to assigned counsel (See Due Process)

Sanctions against .............................................................................. 2000–17 Gotbetter.

Credibility of Witnesses:

Generally ........................................................................................... 95–25 Conquest Helicopters; 95–26 Hereth; 97–32 Florida Propeller.

Bias .................................................................................................... 97–9 Alphin; 2000–18 Gotbetter.

Defer to ALJ determination of ......................................................... 90–21 Carroll; 92–3 Park; 93–17 Metcalf; 95–26 Hereth; 97–20

Werle; 97–30 Emery Worldwide Airlines; 97–32 Florida Propeller;

98–11 TWA; 98–18 General Aviation; 99–6 Squire; 2000–3

Warbelow’s; 2000–14 Warbelow’s; 2000–17 Gotbetter.

Experts (See also Witness) ............................................................... 90–27 Gabbert; 93–17 Metcalf; 96–3 America West Airlines.

Impeachment .................................................................................... 94–4 Northwest Aircraft Rental.

Reliability of eyewitness identification .......................................... 97–20 Werle.

De facto answer ....................................................................................... 92–32 Barnhill.

Delay in initiating action ........................................................................ 90–21 Carroll.

Deliberative Process Privilege ................................................................. 89–6 American Airlines; 90–12, 90–18 & 90–19 Continental Airlines.

Deterrence ................................................................................................ 89–5 Schultz; 92–10 Flight Unlimited; 95–16 Mulhall; 95–17 Larry’s

Flying Service; 97–11 Hampton.

Discovery:.

Deliberative Process Privilege ......................................................... 89–6 American Airlines; 90–12, 90–18 & 90–19 Continental Airlines.

Depositions, generally ...................................................................... 91–54 Alaska Airlines.

Notice of deposition .................................................................. 91–54 Alaska Airlines.

No Duty to Provide List of Evidence Without Request ................. Horner 2000–19.

Failure to Produce ............................................................................ 90–18 & 90–19 Continental Airlines; 91–17 KDS Aviation; 93–10

Costello.

Sanction for ............................................................................... 91–17 KDS Aviation; 91–54 Alaska Airlines.

Regarding Unrelated Case ................................................................ 92–46 Sutton-Sautter.

Double Jeopardy ...................................................................................... 95–8 Charter Airlines; 96–26 Midtown.

Due Process:

Generally ........................................................................................... 89–6 American Airlines; 90–12 Continental Airlines; 90–37 Northwest Airlines; 96–1 [Airport Operator]; 97–8 Pacific Av. d/b/a

Inter-Island Helicopters; 99–12 TWA.

Before finding a violation ................................................................ 90–27 Gabbert.

Multiple violations ........................................................................... 96–26 Midtown; 97–9 Alphin.

No right to assigned counsel ........................................................... 97–8 Pacific Av. d/b/a Inter-Island Helicopters; 97–9 Alphin; 99–6

Squire.

Violation of ....................................................................................... 89–6 American Airlines; 90–12 Continental Airlines; 90–37 Northwest Airlines; 96–1 [Airport Operator]; 97–8 Pacific Av. d/b/a

Inter-Island Helicopters; 98–19 Martin & Jaworski.

EAJA:

Adversary Adjudication ................................................................... 90–17 Wilson; 91–17 & 91–52 KDS Aviation; 94–17 TCI; 95–12 Toyota.

Amount of award ............................................................................. 95–27 Valley Air.

Appeal from ALJ decision ............................................................... 95–9 Woodhouse.

Expert witness fees ........................................................................... 95–27 Valley Air.

Final disposition .............................................................................. 96–22 Woodhouse.

Further proceedings ......................................................................... 91–52 KDS Aviation.

Jurisdiction over appeal ................................................................... 92–74 Wendt; 96–22 Woodhouse.

Late-filed application ................................................................ 96–22 Woodhouse.

Other expenses ................................................................................. 93–29 Sweeney.

Position of agency ............................................................................ 95–27 Valley Air.

Prevailing party ................................................................................ 91–52 KDS Aviation.

Special circumstances ...................................................................... 95–18 Pacific Sky.

Substantial justification ................................................................... 91–52 & 92–71 KDS Aviation; 93–9 Wendt; 95–18 Pacific Sky; 95–

27 Valley Air; 96–15 Valley Air; 98–19 Martin & Jaworski.

Supplementation of application ...................................................... 95–27 Valley Air.

Evidence (See Proof & Evidence):

Ex Parte Communications ....................................................................... 93–10 Costello; 95–16 Mulhall; 95–19 Rayner.

Expert Witnesses (See Witness):

Extension of Time:

By Agreement of Parties .................................................................. 89–6 American Airlines; 92–41 Moore & Sabre Associates.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices 67451

Dismissal by Decisionmaker ............................................................ 89–7 Zenkner; 90–39 Hart.

Good Cause for ................................................................................. 89–8 Thunderbird Accessories.

Objection to ...................................................................................... 89–8 Thunderbird Accessories; 93–3 Wendt.

Who may grant ................................................................................. 90–27 Gabbert.

Federal Courts .......................................................................................... 92–7 West; 97–1 Midtown Neon Sign; 98–8 Carr; 99–12 TWA.

Hazardous materials case appeals ................................................... 97–1 Midtown Neon Sign; 98–8 Carr; 2000–4 Ryan International.

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ............................................................ 91–17 KDS Aviation.

Federal Rules of Evidence (See also Proof & Evidence):

Admissions ....................................................................................... 96–25 USAir, 99–5 Africa Air; 99–14 Alika Aviation.

Evidentiary admissions are rebuttable ..................................... 99–5 Africa Air.

Settlement Offers (Rule 408) ........................................................... 95–16 Mulhall; 96–25 USAir; 99–5 Africa Air.

Exclusion of admissions in settlement offers .......................... 99–5 Africa Air; 99–14 Alika Aviation.

Statements against interest .............................................................. 2000–3 Warbelow’s.

Subsequent Remedial Measures ...................................................... 96–24 Horizon; 96–25 USAir.

Final Oral Argument ............................................................................... 92–3 Park.

Firearms (See Weapons):

Ferry Flights ............................................................................................. 95–8 Charter Airlines.

Filing (See also Appeals; Timeliness):

Burden to prove date of filing ......................................................... 97–11 Hampton Air; 98–1 V. Taylor.

Discrepancy between certificate of service and postmark ............. 98–16 Blue Ridge.

Service on designated representative .............................................. 98–19 Martin & Jaworski.

Flight & Duty Time:

Circumstances beyond crew’s control:

Generally .................................................................................... 95–8 Charter Airlines.

Foreseeability ............................................................................ 95–8 Charter Airlines.

Late freight ................................................................................. 95–8 Charter Airlines.

Weather ...................................................................................... 95–8 Charter Airlines.

Competency check flights ................................................................ 94–4 South Aero.

Limitation of Duty Time .................................................................. 95–8 Charter Airlines; 96–4 South Aero.

Limitation of Flight Time ................................................................ 95–8 Charter Airlines.

‘‘Other commercial flying’’ ....................................................... 95–8 Charter Airlines.

Recordkeeping: Individual flight time records for each Part 135

pilot.

99–7 Premier Jets.

Flights ....................................................................................................... 94–20 Conquest Helicopters.

Freedom of Information Act ................................................................... 93–10 Costello.

Fuel Exhaustion ....................................................................................... 95–26 Hereth.

Guns (See Weapons):

Ground Security Coordinator (See also Air Carrier; Standard Security Program):.

Failure to provide ............................................................................. 96–16 WestAir Commuter.

‘‘Guilt by association’’ ............................................................................. 2000–17 Gotbetter.

Hazardous Materials:

Transportation of, generally ............................................................ 90–37 Northwest Airlines; 92–76 Safety Equipment; 92–77 TCI; 94–

19 Pony Express; 94–28 Toyota: 94–31 Smalling; 95–12 Toyota;

95–16 Mulhall; 96–26 Midtown.

Civil Penalty, generally .................................................................... 92–77 TCI; 94–28 Toyota; 94–31 Smalling; 95–16 Mulhall; 96–26

Midtown; 98–2 Carr; 2000–20 Phillips Building Supply.

Corrective Action ...................................................................... 92–77 TCI; 94–28 Toyota; 2000–20 Phillips Building Supply.

Culpability ................................................................................. 92–77 TCI; 94–28 Toyota; 94–31 Smalling.

Financial hardship .................................................................... 95–16 Mulhall.

Installment plan ................................................................. 95–16 Mulhall.

First-time violation ................................................................... 92–77 TCI; 94–28 Toyota; 94–31 Smalling; 2000–20 Phillips Building Supply.

Gravity of violation ................................................................... 92–77 TCI; 94–28 Toyota; 94–31 Smalling; 96–26 Midtown; 98–2

Carr; 2000–20 Phillips Building Supply.

Minimum penalty ..................................................................... 95–16 Mulhall; 98–2 Carr.

Number of violations ................................................................ 95–16 Mulhall; 96–26 Midtown Neon Sign; 98–2 Carr; 2000–20

Phillips Building Supply.

Redundant violations ................................................................ 95–16 Mulhall; 96–26 Midtown Neon Sign; 98–2 Carr.

Criminal Penalty ............................................................................... 92–77 TCI; 94–31 Smalling.

EAJA, applicability of ...................................................................... 94–17 TCI; 95–12 Toyota.

Individual violations ........................................................................ 95–16 Mulhall.

Judicial review under 49 U.S.C. 5123 ............................................. 97–1 Midtown Neon Sign; 98–8 Carr; 2000–4 Ryan International.

Knowingly ......................................................................................... 92–77 TCI; 94–19 Pony Express; 94–31 Smalling.

Specific hazard class transported:

Combustible: Paint .................................................................... 95–16 Mulhall.

Corrosive:

Wet Battery ......................................................................... 94–28 Toyota Motor Sales.

Other ................................................................................... 92–77 TCI.

Explosive: Fireworks ................................................................. 94–31 Smalling; 98–2 Carr.

Flammable:

Paint .................................................................................... 96–26 Midtown Neon Sign.

Turpentine .......................................................................... 95–16 Mulhall.

Noxious Fumes .......................................................................... 2000–20 Phillips Building Supply.

Radioactive ................................................................................ 94–19 Pony Express.

Hearing:.

67452 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices

Failure of party to attend ................................................................. 98–23 Instead Balloon Services.

Informal Conference ................................................................................ 94–4 Northwest Aircraft Rental.

Initial Decision: What constitutes .......................................................... 92–32 Barnhill.

Interference with crewmembers (See also Passenger Misconduct; Assault).92–3 Park; 96–6 Ignatov; 97–12 Mayer; 98–11 TWA; 98–12 Stout;

2000–17 Gotbetter.

Interlocutory Appeal ............................................................................... 89–6 American Airlines; 91–54 Alaska Airlines; 93–37 Airspect; 94–

32 Detroit Metropolitan; 98–25 Gotbetter.

Internal FAA Policy &/or Procedures .................................................... 89–6 American Airlines; 90–12 Continental Airlines; 92–73 Wyatt.

Jurisdiction:

After initial decision ........................................................................ 90–20 Degenhardt; 90–33 Cato; 92–32 Barnhill; 93–28 Strohl.

After Order Assessing Civil Penalty ............................................... 94–37 Houston; 95–19 Rayner.

After withdrawal of complaint ........................................................ 94–39 Kirola.

$50,000 Limit .................................................................................... 90–12 Continental Airlines.

EAJA cases ........................................................................................ 92–74 Wendt; 96–22 Woodhouse.

HazMat cases .................................................................................... 92–76 Safety Equipment.

NTSB ................................................................................................. 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories.

Statutory authority to regulate flights entirely outside of U.S.

questioned.

99–11 Evergreen Helicopters; 2000–12 Evergreen.

Knowledge of concealed weapon (See also Weapons Violation) ......... 89–5 Schultz; 90–20 Degenhardt.

Laches (See Delay in initiating action):

Mailing Rule, generally ........................................................................... 89–7 Zenker; 90–3 Metz; 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories; 90–39

Hart; 98–20 Koenig.

Does not extend time for filing a request for hearing .................... 2000–2 Ryan International.

Overnight express delivery .............................................................. 89–6 American Airlines.

Maintenance (See Aircraft Maintenance):

Maintenance Instruction ......................................................................... 93–36 Valley Air.

Maintenance Manual ............................................................................... 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories; 96–25 USAir.

Air carrier maintenance manual ..................................................... 96–3 America West Airlines.

Approved/accepted repairs .............................................................. 96–3 America West Airlines; 2000–13 Empire Airlines.

Manufacturer’s maintenance manual .............................................. 96–3 America West Airlines; 97–31 Sanford Air; 97–32 Florida Propeller; 2000–3 Warbelow’s; 2000–13 Empire Airlines.

Minimum Equipment List (MEL) (See Aircraft Maintenance):

Mootness, appeal dismissed as moot ..................................................... 92–9 Griffin; 94–17 TCI.

National Aviation Safety Inspection Program (NASIP) ........................ 90–16 Rocky Mountain.

National Transportation Safety Board:

Administrator not bound by NTSB case law ................................. 91–12 Terry & Menne; 92–49 Richardson & Shimp; 93–18 Westair

Commuter.

Lack of Jurisdiction .......................................................................... 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories; 90–17 Wilson; 92–74 Wendt.

Notice of Hearing:.

Receipt .............................................................................................. 92–31 Eaddy.

Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty:

Initiates Action ................................................................................. 91–9 Continental Airlines.

Signature of agency attorney ........................................................... 93–12 Langton.

Withdrawal of ................................................................................... 90–17 Wilson.

Operate, generally .................................................................................... 91–12 & 91–31 Terry & Menne; 93–18 Westair Commuter; 96–17

Fenner.

Responsibility of aircraft owner/operator for actions of pilot ....... 96–17 Fenner; 2000–1 Gatewood.

Responsibility of aircraft owner/operator for employee’s flying

unairworthy aircraft.

2000–1 Gatewood.

Oral Argument before Administrator on appeal:

Decision to hold ............................................................................... 92–16 Wendt.

Instructions for ................................................................................. 92–27 Wendt.

Order Assessing Civil Penalty:

Appeal from ...................................................................................... 92–1 Costello; 95–19 Rayner.

Timeliness of request for hearing .................................................... 95–19 Rayner.

Withdrawal of ................................................................................... 89–4 Metz; 90–16 Rocky Mountain; 90–22 USAir; 95–19 Rayner;

97–7 Stalling.

Parachuting .............................................................................................. 98–3 Fedele.

Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA): Failure to obtain ....................... 93–19 Pacific Sky Supply.

Passenger List .......................................................................................... 99–13 Falcon Air Express.

Passenger Misconduct ............................................................................. 92–3 Park.

Assault/Battery ................................................................................. 96–6 Ignatov; 97–12 Mayer; 98–11 TWA; 99–16 Dorfman.

Compliance with Fasten Seat Belt Sign .......................................... 99–16 Alika Aviation.

Interference with a crewmember ..................................................... 96–6 Ignatov; 97–12 Mayer; 98–11 TWA; 98–12 Stout; 99–16

Dorfman.

Smoking ............................................................................................ 92–37 Giuffrida; 99–6 Squire.

Hearing loss and failure to obey instructions re: not smoking.99–6 Squire.

Stowing carry-on items .................................................................... 97–12 Mayer; 99–16.

Penalty (See Sanction; Hazardous Materials):

Person ....................................................................................................... 93–18 Westair Commuter.

Prima Facie Case (See also Proof & Evidence) ...................................... 95–26 Hereth; 96–3 America West Airlines.

Proof & Evidence (See also Federal Rules of Evidence):

Admissions ....................................................................................... 99–5 Africa Air; 2000–3 Warbelow’s.

Evidentiary admission is rebuttable ........................................ 99–5 Africa Air.

Affirmative Defense .......................................................................... 92–13 Delta Air Lines; 92–72 Giuffrida; 98–6 Continental Airlines.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices 67453

Burden of Proof ................................................................................ 90–26 & 90–43 Waddell; 91–3 Lewis; 91–30 Trujillo; 92–13 Delta

Air Lines; 92–72 Giuffrida; 93–29 Sweeney; 97–32 Florida Propeller; 2000–3 Warbelow’s.

Circumstantial Evidence .................................................................. 90–12, 90–19 & 91–9 Continental Airlines; 93–29 Sweeney; 96–3

America West Airlines; 97–10 Alphin; 97–11 Hampton; 97–32

Florida Propeller; 98–6 Continental Airlines.

Credibility (See Administrative:

Law Judges; Credibility of Witnesses)

Criminal standard rejected .............................................................. 91–12 Terry & Menne; 2000–3 Warbelow’s.

Closing Arguments (See also Final Oral Argument) ...................... 94–20 Conquest Helicopters.

Extra-record material ........................................................................ 95–26 Hereth; 96–24 Horizon.

Hearsay .............................................................................................. 92–72 Giuffrida; 97–30 Emery Worldwide Airlines; 98–11 TWA.

New evidence ................................................................................... 94–4 Northwest Aircraft Rental; 96–23 Kilrain; 99–15 Blue Ridge.

Offer of proof .................................................................................... D97–32 Florida Propeller.

Preponderance of evidence .............................................................. 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories; 90–12 Continental Airlines; 91–12

& 91–31 Terry & Menne; 92–72 Giuffrida; 97–30 Emery Worldwide Airlines; 97–31 Sanford Air; 97–32 Florida Propeller; 98–3

Fedele; 98–6 Continental Airlines; 98–11 TWA.

Presumption that message on ATC tape is received as transmitted.91–12 Terry & Menne; 92–49 Richardson & Shimp.

Presumption that a gun is deadly or dangerous ............................ 90–26 Waddell; 91–30 Trujillo.

Presumption that owner gave pilot permission ............................. 96–17 Fenner.

Prima facie case ................................................................................ 95–26 Hereth, 96–3 America West; 98–6 Continental Airlines.

Settlement offer ................................................................................ 95–16 Mulhall; 96–25 USAir; 99–5 Africa Air.

Admission as part of settlement offer excluded ..................... 99–5 Africa Air; 99–14 Alika Aviation.

Subsequent remedial measures ....................................................... 96–24 Horizon; 96–25 USAir.

Substantial evidence ........................................................................ 92–72 Giuffrida.

Pro Se Parties:

Special Considerations ..................................................................... 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories; 90–3 Metz; 95–25 Conquest.

Prosecutorial Discretion .......................................................................... 89–6 American Airlines; 90–23 Broyles; 90–38 Continental Airlines;

91–41 [Airport Operator]; 92–46 Sutton-Sautter; 92–73 Wyatt; 95–

17 Larry’s Flying Service.

Administrator does not review Complainant’s decision not to

bring action against anyone but respondent.

98–2 Carr.

Reconsideration:

Denied by ALJ .................................................................................. 89–4 & 90–3 Metz.

Granted by ALJ ................................................................................. 92–32 Barnhill.

Late request for ................................................................................. 97–14 Pacific Aviation; 98–14 Larry’s Flying Service; 2000–5 Blue

Ridge.

Petition based on new material ....................................................... 96–23 Kilrain; 2000–14 Warbelow’s.

Repetitious petitions ........................................................................ 96–9 [Airport Operator]; 2000–5 Blue Ridge; 2000–14 Warbelow’s;

2000–16 Warbelow’s.

Stay of order pending ...................................................................... 90–31 Carroll; 90–32 Continental Airlines; 2000–14 Warbelow’s.

Redundancy, enhancing safety ............................................................... 97–11 Hampton.

Remand .................................................................................................... 89–6 American Airlines; 90–16 Rocky Mountain; 90–24 Bayer; 91–

51 Hagwood; 91–54 Alaska Airlines; 92–1 Costello; 92–76 Safety

Equipment; 94–37 Houston; 2000–5 Blue Ridge.

Repair Station .......................................................................................... 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories; 92–10 Flight Unlimited; 94–2

Woodhouse; 97–9 Alphin; 97–10 Alphin; 97–31 Sanford Air; 97–

32 Florida Propeller; 2000–1 Gatewood.

Request for Hearing ................................................................................. 94–37 Houston; 95–19 Rayner.

Constructive withdrawal of ............................................................. 97–7 Stalling; 98–23 Instead Balloon Services.

Timeliness of request ....................................................................... 93–12 Langton; 95–19 Raynor; 2000–2 Ryan International.

Untimely request for hearing will be excused for good cause ...... 94–27 Larsen; 93–12 Langton; 2000–2 Ryan International.

Rules of Practice (14 CFR Part 13, Subpart G):

Applicability of ................................................................................ 90–12, 90–18 & 90–19 Continental Airlines; 91–17 KDS Aviation.

Challenges to .................................................................................... 90–12, 90–18 & 90–19 Continental Airlines; 90–21 Carroll; 90–37

Northwest Airlines.

Effect of Changes in ......................................................................... 90–21 Carroll; 90–22 USAir; 90–38 Continental Airlines.

Initiation of Action ........................................................................... 90–9 Continental Airlines.

Runway incursions .................................................................................. 92–40 Wendt; 93–18 Westair Commuter.

Sanction:

Ability to Pay .................................................................................... 89–5 Schultz; 90–10 Webb; 91–3 Lewis; 91–38 Esau; 92–10 Flight

Unlimited; 92–32 Barnhill; 92–37 & 92–72 Giuffrida; 92–38

Cronberg; 92–46 Sutton-Sautter; 92–51 Koblick; 93–10 Costello;

94–4 Northwest Aircraft Rental; 94–20 Conquest Helicopters; 95–

16 Mulhall; 95–17 Larry’s Flying Service; 97–8 Pacific Av. d/b/a

Inter-Island Helicopters; 97–11 Hampton; 97–16 Mauna Kea; 98–4

Larry’s Flying Service; 98–11 TWA; 99–12 TWA; 99–15 Blue

Ridge; 2000–3 Warbelow’s.

Agency policy:

ALJ bound by ............................................................................ 90–37 Northwest Airlines; 92–46 Sutton-Sautter; 96–19 [Air Carrier];

2000–3 Warbelow’s.

Changes after complaint ........................................................... 97–7 & 97–17 Stallings.

67454 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices

Statements of e.g., FAA Order 2150.3A, Sanction Guidance

Table, memoranda pertaining to).

90–19; Continental Airlines; 90–23 Broyles; 90–33 Cato; 90–37

Northwest Airlines; 92–46 Sutton–Sautter’ 94–4 South Aero; 96–

19 [Air Carrier]; 96–25 USAir.

Community Service .......................................................................... 2000–21 Martinez.

Compliance Disposition ................................................................... 97–23 Detroit Metropolitan.

Consistency with Precedent ............................................................ 96–6 Ignatov; 96–26 Midtown; 97–30 Emery Worldwide Airlines;

98–12 Stout; 98–18 General Aviation.

But when precedent is based on superseded sanction policy 96–19 [Air Carrier].

Corrective Action ............................................................................. 91–18 [Airport Operator]; 91–40 [Airport Operator]; 91–41 [Airport

Operator]; 92–5 Delta Air Lines; 93–18 Westair Commuter; 94–28

Toyota; 96–4 South Aero; 96–19 [Air Carrier]; 97–16 Mauna Kea;

97–23 Detroit Metropolitan; 98–6 Continental Airlines; 98–22

Northwest Airlines; 99–12 TWA; 99–14 Alika Aviation; 2000–20

Phillips Building Supply.

Discovery (See Discovery):

Factors to consider ........................................................................... 89–5 Schultz; 90–23 Broyles; 90–37 Northwest Airlines; 91–3 Lewis;

91–18 [Airport Operator]; 91–40 [Airport Operator] 91–41 [Airport

Operator]; 92–10 Flight Unlimited; 92–46 Sutton-Sautter; 92–51

Koblick; 94–28 Toyota; 95–11 Horizon; 96–19 [Air Carrier]; 96–26

Midtown; 97–16 Mauna Kea; 98–2 Carr; 99–15 Blue Ridge; 2000–3

Warbelow’s.

First-Time Offenders ........................................................................ 89–5 Schultz; 95–5 Delta Air Lines; 92–51 Koblick.

HazMat (See Hazardous Materials)

Inexperience ..................................................................................... 92–10 Flight Unlimited.

Installment Payments ....................................................................... 95–16 Mulhall; 95–17 Larry’s Flying Service.

Maintenance ..................................................................................... 95–11 Horizon; 96–3 America West Airlines; 97–8 Pacific Av. d/b/a

Inter-Island Helicopters; 97–9 Alphin; 97–10 Alphin; 97–11

Hampton; 97–30 Emery Worldwide Airlines; 99–14 Alika Aviation; 2000–3 Warbelow’s.

Maximum .......................................................................................... 90–10 Webb; 91–53 Koller; 96–19 [Air Carrier].

Minimum (HazMat) .......................................................................... 95–16 Mulhall; 96–26 Midtown; 98–2 Carr.

Modified ............................................................................................ 89–5 Schultz; 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories; 91–38 Esau; 92–10

Flight Unlimited; 92–13 Delta Air Lines; 92–32 Barnhill.

Partial Dismissal of Complaint/Full Sanction (See also Complaint).94–19 Pony Express; 94–40 Polynesian Airways.

Sanctions in specific cases:

Failure to comply with Security Directives ............................ 98–6 Continental Airlines; 99–12 TWA.

Passenger/baggage matching ..................................................... 98–6 Continental Airlines; 99–12 TWA.

Passenger Misconduct ............................................................... 97–12 Mayer; 98–12 Stout; 2000–17 Gotbetter.

Person evading screening (See also Screening) ...................... 97–20 Werle; 2000–19 Horner.

Pilot Deviation ........................................................................... 92–8 Watkins.

Test object detection ................................................................. 90–18 & 90–19 Continental Airlines; 96–19 [Air Carrier].

Unairworthy aircraft ................................................................. 97–8 Pacific Av. d/b/a Inter-Island Helicopters; 97–9 Alphin; 98–18

General Aviation; 99–14 Alika Aviation; 2000–3 Warbelow’s.

Unauthorized access ................................................................. 90–19 Continental Airlines; 90–37 Northwest Airlines; 94–1 Delta

Air Lines; 98–7 LAX.

Unqualified pilot ....................................................................... 99–15 Blue Ridge.

Weapons violations ................................................................... 90–23 Broyles; 90–33 Cato; 91–3 Lewis; 91–38 Esau; 92–32 Barnhill;

92–46 Sutton-Sautter; 92–51 Koblick; 94–5 Grant; 97–7 & 97–17

Stallings.

Screening of Persons and Carry-on Items (See also Test Object Detection):

Air carrier failure to detect weapon Sanction ................................ 94–44 American Airlines.

Air carrier failure to match bag with passenger ............................. 98–6 Continental Airlines; 99–12 TWA.

Entering Sterile Areas ...................................................................... 90–24 Bayer; 92–58 Hoedl; 97–20 Werle; 98–20 Koenig; 2000–19

Horner.

Sanction for individual evading screening (See also Sanction) .... 97–20 Werle; 98–20 Koenig; 2000–19 Horner.

Security Directive re: screening of carry-on items given to passenger by person unknown to the passenger.

2000–6 Atlantic Coast Aviation.

Security (See Screening of Persons, Standard Security Program, Test

Object Detection, Unauthorized Access, Weapons Violations):

Agency directives, violation of ........................................................ 99–12 TWA.

Giving false information about carrying a weapon or explosive

on board an aircraft.

98–24 Stevens.

Sealing of Record ..................................................................................... 97–13 Westair Commuter; 97–28 Continental Airlines.

Separation of Functions .......................................................................... 90–12 Continental Airlines; 90–18 Continental Airlines; 90–19 Continental Airlines; 90–21 Carroll; 90–38 Continental Airlines; 93–

13 Medel.

Service (See also Mailing Rule; Receipt):

Date of when no certificate of service ............................................ 2000–2 Ryan International.

Of NPCP ............................................................................................ 90–22 USAir; 90–20 Werle.

Of FNPCP .......................................................................................... 93–13 Medel.

Receipt of document sent by mail .................................................. 92–31 Eaddy; 2000–5 Blue Ridge.

Return of certified mail .................................................................... 97–7 & 97–17 Stallings; 2000–5 Blue Ridge.

Valid Service .................................................................................... 92–18 Bargen; 98–19 Martin & Jaworski.

Settlement ................................................................................................ 91–50 & 92–1 Costello; 95–16 Mulhall; 99–10 Azteca.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices 67455

Request for hearing not withdrawn ................................................ 99–10 Azteca.

Skydiving ................................................................................................. 98–3 Fedele.

Smoking ................................................................................................... 92–37 Giuffrida; 94–18 Luxemburg; 99–6 Squire.

‘‘Squawk sheets’’ ..................................................................................... 2000–18 California Helitech.

Stale Complaint Rule: If NPCP not sent ................................................ 97–20 Werle.

Standard Security Program (SSP):

Compliance with .............................................................................. 90–12, 90–18 & 90–19 Continental Airlines; 91–33 Delta Air Lines;

91–55 Continental Airlines; 92–13 & 94–1 Delta Air Lines; 96–19

[Air Carrier]; 98–22 Northwest Airlines; 99–1 American.

Checkpoint Security Coordinator .................................................... 98–22 Northwest Airlines.

Ground Security Coordinator .......................................................... 96–16 Westair Commuter.

When an airline is required to have a security program ........ 2000–6 Atlantic Coast Aviation.

Statute of Limitations .............................................................................. 97–20 Werle.

Stay of Orders .......................................................................................... 90–31 Carroll; 90–32 Continental Airlines.

Pending judicial review ................................................................... 95–14 Charter Airlines.

Strict Liability .......................................................................................... 89–5 Schultz; 90–27 Gabbert; 91–18 [Airport Operator]; 91–40 [Airport Operator]; 91–58 [Airport Operator]; 97–23 Detroit Metropolitan; 98–7 LAX; 2000–3 Warbelow’s.

Test Object Detection .............................................................................. 90–12, 90–18, 90–19, 91–9 & 91–55 Continental Airlines; 92–13

Delta Air Lines; 96–19 [Air Carrier].

Proof of violation .............................................................................. 90–18, 90–19 & 91–9 Continental Airlines; 92–13 Delta Air Lines.

Sanction ............................................................................................ 90–18 & 90–19 Continental Airlines; 96–19 [Air Carrier].

Timeliness (See also Complaint; Filing; Mailing Rule; and Appeals):

Burden to prove date of filing ......................................................... 97–11 Hampton Air; 98–1 V. Taylor.

Of response to NPCP ........................................................................ 90–22 USAir.

Of complaint ..................................................................................... 91–51 Hagwood; 93–13 Medel; 94–7 Hereth.

Of initial decision ............................................................................ 97–31 Sanford Air.

Of NPCP ............................................................................................ 92–73 Wyatt.

Of petition to reconsider .................................................................. 2000–5 Blue Ridge.

Of reply brief .................................................................................... 97–11 Hampton.

Of request for hearing ...................................................................... 93–12 Langton; 95–19 Rayner; 2000–2 Ryan International.

Of EAJA application (See EAJA—Final disposition, EAJA—Jurisdiction)

Unapproved Parts (See also Parts Manufacturer Approval) ................. 93–19 Pacific Sky Supply.

Unauthorized Access:

To aircraft ......................................................................................... 90–12 & 90–19 Continental Airlines; 94–1 Delta Air Lines.

To Air Operations Area (AOA) ....................................................... 90–37 Northwest Airlines; 91–18 [Airport Operator]; 91–40 [Airport

Operator]; 91–58 [Airport Operator]; 94–1 Delta Air Lines.

Visual Cues Indicating Runway, Adequacy of 92–40 Wendt.

Weapons Violations, generally ............................................................... 89–5 Schultz; 90–10 Webb; 90–20 Degenhardt; 90–23 Broyles; 90–33

Cato; 90–26 & 90–43 Waddell; 91–3 Lewis; 91–30 Trujillo; 91–38

Esau; 91–53 Koller; 92–32 Barnhill; 92–46 Sutton-Sautter; 92–51

Koblick; 92–59 Petek-Jackson; 94–5 Grant; 94–44 American Airlines.

Concealed weapon ........................................................................... 89–5 Schultz; 92–46 Sutton-Sautter; 92–51 Koblick.

‘‘Deadly or Dangerous’’ .................................................................... 90–26 & 90–43 Waddell; 91–30 Trujillo; 91–38 Esau.

First-time Offenders ......................................................................... 89–5 Schultz.

Intent to commit violation ............................................................... 89–5 Schultz; 90–20 Degenhardt; 90–23 Broyles; 90–26 Waddell;

91–3 Lewis; 91–53 Koller.

Knowledge of Weapon Concealment (See also Knowledge) ......... 89–5 Schultz; 90–20 Degenhardt.

Sanction (See Sanction)

Weight and Balance ................................................................................. 94–40 Polynesian Airways.

Passenger list .................................................................................... 99–13 Falcon Air Express.

Witnesses (See also Credibility):

Absence of, Failure to subpoena ..................................................... 92–3 Park; 98–2 Carr.

Expert testimony, Evaluation of ...................................................... 93–17 Metcalf; 94–3 Valley Air; 94–21 Sweeney; 96–3 America West

Airlines; 96–15 Valley Air; 97–9 Alphin; 97–32 Florida Propeller.

Expert witness fees (See EAJA)

Sequester order ................................................................................. 2000–18 California Helitech.

REGULATIONS (Title 14 CFR, unless otherwise noted)

1.1 (maintenance) .................................................................................... 94–38 Bohan; 97–11 Hampton.

1.1 (major alteration) ............................................................................... 99–5 Africa Air.

1.1 (major repair) ..................................................................................... 96–3 America West Airlines.

1.1 (minor repair) .................................................................................... 96–3 America West Airlines.

1.1 (operate) ............................................................................................. 91–12 & 91–31 Terry & Menne; 93–18 Westair Commuter; 96–17

Fenner.

1.1 (person) .............................................................................................. 93–18 Westair Commuter.

1.1 (propeller) .......................................................................................... 96–15 Valley Air.

13.16 ......................................................................................................... 90–16 Rocky Mountain; 90–22 USAir; 90–37 Northwest Airlines;

90–38 & 91–9 Continental Airlines; 91–18 [Airport Operator]; 91–

51 Hagwood; 92–1 Costello; 92–46 Sutton-Sautter; 93–13 Medel;

93–28 Strohl; 94–27 Larsen; 94–37 Houston; 94–31 Smalling; 95–

19 Rayner; 96–26 Midtown Neon Sign; 97–1 Midtown Neon Sign;

97–9 Alphin; 98–18 General Aviation; 2000–2 Ryan International;

2000–3 Warbelow’s.

67456 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices

13.201 ....................................................................................................... 90–12 Continental Airlines.

13.202 ....................................................................................................... 90–6 American Airlines; 92–76 Safety Equipment.

13.203 ....................................................................................................... 90–12 Continental Airlines; 90–21 Carroll; 90–38 Continental Airlines.

13.204

13.205 ....................................................................................................... 90–20 Degenhardt; 91–17 KDS Aviation; 91–54 Alaska Airlines; 92–

32 Barnhill; 94–32 Detroit Metropolitan; 94–39 Kirola; 95–16

Mulhall; 97–20 Werle; 2000–17 Gotbetter; 2000–20 Phillips Building Supply.

13.206

13.207 ....................................................................................................... 94–39 Kirola.

13.208 ....................................................................................................... 90–21 Carroll; 91–51 Hagwood; 92–73 Wyatt; 92–76 Safety Equipment; 93–13 Medel; 93–28 Strohl; 94–7 Hereth; 97–20 Werle; 98–

4 Larry’s.

13.209 ....................................................................................................... 90–3 Metz; 90–15 Playter; 91–18 [Airport Operator]; 92–32 Barnhill;

92–47 Cornwall; 92–75 Beck; 92–76 Safety Equipment; 94–8

Nunez; 94–5 Grant; 94–22 Harkins; 94–29 Sutton; 94–30 Columna;

95–10 Diamond; 95–28 Atlantic World Airways; 97–7 Stalling;

97–18 Robinson; 97–33 Rawlings; 98–21 Blankson.

13.210 ....................................................................................................... 92–19 Cornwall; 92–75 Beck; 92–76 Safety Equipment; 93–7 Dunn;

93–28 Strohl; 94–5 Grant; 94–30 Columna; 95–28 Atlantic World

Airways; 96–17 Fenner; 97–11 Hampton; 97–18 Robinson; 97–38

Air St. Thomas; 98–16 Blue Ridge.

13.211 ....................................................................................................... 89–6 American Airlines; 89–7 Zenkner; 90–3 Metz; 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories; 90–39 Hart; 91–24 Esau; 92–1 Costello; 92–9

Griffin; 92–18 Bargen; 92–19 Cornwall; 92–57 Detroit Metro.

Wayne County Airport; 92–74 Wendt; 92–76 Safety Equipment;

93–2 Wendt; 94–5 Grant; 94–18 Luxemburg; 94–29 Sutton; 95–12

Toyota; 95–28 Valley Air; 97–7 Stalling; 97–11 Hampton; 98–4

Larry’s Flying Service; 98–19 Martin & Jaworski, 98–20 Koenig;

99–2 Oxygen Systems; 2000–2 Ryan International; 2000–5 Blue

Ridge.

13.212 ....................................................................................................... 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories; 91–2 Continental Airlines; 99–2

Oxygen Systems.

13.213

13.214 ....................................................................................................... 91–3 Lewis.

13.215 ....................................................................................................... 93–28 Strohl; 94–39 Kirola.

13.216

13.217 ....................................................................................................... 91–17 KDS Aviation.

13.218 ....................................................................................................... 89–6 American Airlines; 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories; 90–39

Hart; 92–9 Griffin; 92–73 Wyatt; 93–19 Pacific Sky Supply; 94–6

Strohl; 94–27 Larsen; 94–37 Houston; 95–18 Rayner; 96–16

WestAir; 96–24 Horizon; 98–20 Koenig.

13.219 ....................................................................................................... 89–6 American Airlines; 91–2 Continental; 91–54 Alaska Airlines;

93–37 Airspect; 94–32 Detroit Metro. Wayne County Airport; 98–

25 Gotbetter.

13.220 ....................................................................................................... 89–6 American Airlines; 90–20 Carroll; 91–8 Watts Agricultural

Aviation; 91–17 KDS Aviation; 91–54 Alaska Airlines; 92–46 Sutton-Sautter; Horner 2000–19.

13.221 ....................................................................................................... 92–29 Haggland; 92–31 Eaddy; 92–52 Cullop.

13.222 ....................................................................................................... 92–72 Giuffrida; 96–15 Valley Air.

13.223 ....................................................................................................... 91–12 & 91–31 Terry & Menne; 92–72 Giuffrida; 95–26 Hereth; 96–

15 Valley Air; 97–11 Hampton; 97–31 Sanford Air; 97–32 Florida

Propeller; 98–3 Fedele; 98–6 Continental Airlines; 2000–3

Warbelow’s.

13.224 ....................................................................................................... 90–26 Waddell; 91–4 [Airport Operator]; 92–72 Giuffrida; 94–18

Luxemburg; 94–28 Toyota; 95–25 Conquest; 96–17 Fenner; 97–32

Florida Propeller; 98–6 Continental Airlines; 2000–3 Warbelow’s;

2000–20 Phillips Building Supply.

13.225 ....................................................................................................... 97–32 Florida Propeller.

13.226

13.227 ....................................................................................................... 90–21 Carroll; 95–26 Hereth.

13.228 ....................................................................................................... 92–3 Park.

13.229

13.230 ....................................................................................................... 92–19 Cornwall; 95–26 Hereth; 96–24 Horizon.

13.231 ....................................................................................................... 92–3 Park.

13.232 ....................................................................................................... 89–5 Schultz; 90–20 Degenhardt; 92–1 Costello; 92–18 Bargen; 92–

32 Barnhill; 93–28 Strohl; 94–28 Toyota; 95–12 Toyota; 95–16

Mulhall; 96–6 Ignatov; 98–18 General Aviation; 2000–19 Horner.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices 67457

13.233 ....................................................................................................... 89–1 Gressani; 89–4 Metz; 89–5 Schultz; 89–7 Zenkner; 89–8 Thunderbird Accessories; 90–3 Metz; 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories;

90–19 Continental Airlines; 90–20 Degenhardt; 90–25 & 90–27

Gabbert; 90–35 P. Adams; 90–19 Continental Airlines; 90–39 Hart;

91–2 Continental Airlines; 91–3 Lewis; 91–7 Pardue; 91–8 Watts

Agricultural Aviation; 91–10 Graham; 91–11 Continental Airlines;

91–12 Bargen; 91–24 Esau; 91–26 Britt Airways; 91–31 Terry &

Menne; 91–32 Bargen; 91–43 & 91–44 Delta; 91–45 Park; 91–46

Delta; 91–47 Delta; 91–48 Wendt; 91–52 KDS Aviation; 91–53

Koller; 92–1 Costello; 92–3 Park; 92–7 West; 92–11 Alilin; 92–15

Dillman; 92–16 Wendt; 92–18 Bargen; 92–19 Cornwall; 92–27

Wendt; 92–32 Barnhill; 92–34 Carrell; 92–35 Bay Land Aviation;

92–36 Southwest Airlines; 92–39 Beck; 92–45 O’Brien; 92–52

Beck; 92–56 Montauk Caribbean Airways; 92–57 Detroit Metro.

Wayne Co. Airport; 92–67 USAir; 92–69 McCabe; 92–72 Giuffrida;

92–74 Wendt; 92–78 TWA; 93–5 Wendt; 93–6 Westair Commuter;

93–7 Dunn; 93–8 Nunez; 93–19 Pacific Sky Supply; 93–23 Allen;

93–27 Simmons; 93–28 Strohl; 93–31 Allen; 93–32 Nunez; 94–9 B

& G Instruments; 94–10 Boyle; 94–12 Bartusiak; 94–15 Columna;

94–18 Luxemburg; 94–23 Perez; 94–24 Page; 94–26 French Aircraft; 94–28 Toyota; 95–2 Meronek; 95–9 Woodhouse; 95–13

Kilrain; 95–23 Atlantic World Airways; 95–25 Conquest; 95–26

Hereth; 96–1 [Airport Operator]; 96–2 Skydiving Center; 97–1

Midtown Neon Sign; 97–2 Sanford Air; 97–7 Stalling; 97–22 Sanford Air; 97–24 Gordon Air; 97–31 Sanford Air; 97–33 Rawlings;

97–38 Air St. Thomas; 98–4 Larry’s Flying Service; 98–3 Fedele;

Continental Airlines 98–6; LAX 98–7; 98–10 Rawlings; 98–15

Squire; 98–18 General Aviation; 98–19 Martin & Jaworksi; 98–20

Koenig; 99–2 Oxygen Systems; 99–11 Evergreen Helicopters.

13.234 ....................................................................................................... 90–19 Continental Airlines; 90–31 Carroll; 90–32 & 90–38 Continental Airlines; 91–4 [Airport Operator]; 95–12 Toyota; 96–9 [Airport Operator]; 96–23 Kilrain; 2000–5 Blue Ridge; Warbelow’s

2000–16.

13.235 ....................................................................................................... 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories; 90–12 Continental Airlines; 90–15

Playter; 90–17 Wilson; 92–7 West.

Part 14 ...................................................................................................... 92–74 & 93–2 Wendt; 95–18 Pacific Sky Supply.

14.01 ......................................................................................................... 91–17 & 92–71 KDS Aviation.

14.04 ......................................................................................................... 91–17, 91–52 & 92–71 KDS Aviation; 93–10 Costello; 95–27 Valley

Air.

14.05 ......................................................................................................... 90–17 Wilson.

14.12 ......................................................................................................... 95–27 Valley Air.

14.20 ......................................................................................................... 91–52 KDS Aviation; 96–22 Woodhouse.

14.22 ......................................................................................................... 93–29 Sweeney.

14.23 ......................................................................................................... 98–19 Martin & Jaworski.

14.26 ......................................................................................................... 91–52 KDS Aviation; 95–27 Valley Air.

14.28 ......................................................................................................... 95–9 Woodhouse.

12.181 ....................................................................................................... 96–25 USAir.

21.303 ....................................................................................................... 93–19 Pacific Sky Supply; 95–18 Pacific Sky Supply.

25.787 ....................................................................................................... 97–30 Emery Worldwide Airlines.

25.855 ....................................................................................................... 92–37 Giuffrida; 97–30 Emery Worldwide Airlines.

39.3 ........................................................................................................... 92–10 Flight Unlimited; 94–4 Northwest Aircraft Rental.

43.3 ........................................................................................................... 92–73 Wyatt; 97–31 Sanford Air; 98–18 General Aviation; 2000–1

Gatewood.

43.5 ........................................................................................................... 96–18 Kilrain; 97–31 Sanford Air.

43.9 ........................................................................................................... 91–8 Watts Agricultural Aviation; 97–31 Sanford Air; 98–4 Larry’s

Flying Service.

43.13 ......................................................................................................... 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories; 94–3 Valley Air; 94–38 Bohan; 96–

3 America West Airlines; 96–25 USAir; 97–9 Alphin; 97–10

Alphin; 97–30 Emery Worldwide Airlines; 97–31 Sanford Air; 97–

32 Florida Propeller; 2000–13 Empire Airlines.

43.15 ......................................................................................................... 90–25 & 90–27 Gabbert; 91–8 Watts Agricultural Aviation; 94–2

Woodhouse; 96–18 Kilrain.

61.3 ........................................................................................................... 99–11 Evergreen Helicopters; 2000–12 Evergreen.

65.15 ......................................................................................................... 92–73 Wyatt.

65.81 ......................................................................................................... 2000–1 Gatewood.

65.92 ......................................................................................................... 92–73 Wyatt.

91.7 ........................................................................................................... 97–8 Pacific Av. d/b/a Inter-Island Helicopters; 97–17 Mauna Kea;

98–18 General Aviation; 99–5 Africa Air; 2000–1 Gatewood;

2000–3 Warbelow’s; 2000–14 Warbelow’s.

91.8 (91.11 as of 8/18/90) ....................................................................... 92–3 Park.

91.9 (91.13 as of 8/18/90) ....................................................................... 90–15 Playter; 91–12 & 91–31 Terry & Menne; 92–8 Watkins; 92–40

Wendt; 92–48 USAir; 92–49 Richardson & Shimp; 92–47 Cornwall; 92–70 USAir; 93–9 Wendt; 93–17 Metcalf; 93–18 Westair

Commuter; 93–29 Sweeney; 94–29 Sutton; 95–26 Hereth; 96–17

Fenner.

67458 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices

91.11 ......................................................................................................... 96–6 Ignatov; 97–12 Mayer; 98–12 Stout; 99–16 Dorfman; 2000–17

Gotbetter.

91.29 (91.7 as of 8/18/90) ....................................................................... 91–8 Watts Agricultural Aviation; 92–10 Flight Unlimited; 94–4

Northwest Aircraft Rental.

91.65 (91.111 as of 8/18/90) ................................................................... 91–29 Sweeney; 94–21 Sweeney.

91.67 (91.113 as of 8/18/90) ................................................................... 91–29 Sweeney.

91.71 ......................................................................................................... 97–11 Hampton.

91.75 (91.123 as of 8/18/90) ................................................................... 91–12 & 91–31 Terry & Menne; 92–8 Watkins; 92–40 Wendt; 92–49

Richardson & Shimp; 93–9 Wendt.

91.79 (91.119 as of 8/18/90) ................................................................... 90–15 Playter; 92–47 Cornwall; 93–17 Metcalf.

91.87 (91.129 as of 8/18/90 ..................................................................... 91–12 & 91–31 Terry & Menne; 92–8 Watkins.

91.103 ....................................................................................................... 95–26 Hereth.

91.111 ....................................................................................................... 96–17 Fenner.

91.113 ....................................................................................................... 96–17 Fenner.

91.151 ....................................................................................................... 95–26 Hereth.

91.173 (91.417 as of 8/18/90) ................................................................. 91–8 Watts Agricultural Aviation.

91.203 ....................................................................................................... 99–5 Africa Air.

91.205 ....................................................................................................... 98–18 General Aviation.

91.213 ....................................................................................................... 97–11 Hampton.

91.403 ....................................................................................................... 97–8 Pacific Av. d/b/a Inter-Island Helicopters; 97–31 Sanford Air.

91.405 ....................................................................................................... 97–16 Mauna Kea; 98–4 Larry’s Flying Service; 98–18 General Aviation; 99–5 Africa Air; 2000–1 Gatewood; 2000–18 California

Helitech.

91.407 ....................................................................................................... 98–4 Larry’s Flying Service; 99–5 Africa Air; 2000–1 Gatewood.

91.417 ....................................................................................................... 98–18 General Aviation.

91.517 ....................................................................................................... 98–12 Stout.

91.703 ....................................................................................................... 94–29 Sutton.

105.29 ....................................................................................................... 98–3 Fedele; 98–19 Martin & Jaworski.

107.1 ......................................................................................................... 90–19 Continental Airlines; 90–20 Degenhardt; 91–4 [Airport Operator]; 91–58 [Airport Operator]; 98–7 LAX; 2000–19 Horner.

107.9 ......................................................................................................... 98–7 LAX.

107.13 ....................................................................................................... 90–12 & 90–19 Continental Airlines; 91–4 [Airport Operator]; 91–18

[Airport Operator]; 91–40 [Airport Operator]; 91–41 [Airport Operator]; 91–58 [Airport Operator]; 96–1 [Airport Operator]; 97–23

Detroit Metropolitan; 98–7 LAX.

107.20 ....................................................................................................... 90–24 Bayer; 92–58 Hoedl; 97–20 Werle; 98–20 Koenig; 2000–19

Horner.

107.21 ....................................................................................................... 89–5 Schultz; 90–10 Webb; 90–22 Degenhardt; 90–23 Broyles; 90–26

& 90–43 Waddell; 90–33 Cato; 90–39 Hart; 91–3 Lewis; 91–10

Graham; 91–30 Trujillo; 91–38 Esau; 91–53 Koller; 92–32

Barnhill; 92–38 Cronberg; 92–46 Sutton-Sautter; 92–51 Koblick;

92–59 Petek-Jackson; 94–5 Grant; 94–31 Smalling; 97–7 Stalling.

107.25 ....................................................................................................... 94–30 Columna.

108.5 ......................................................................................................... 90–12, 90–18, 90–19, 91–2 & 91–9 Continental Airlines; 91–33 Delta

Air Lines; 91–54 Alaska Airlines; 91–55 Continental Airlines; 92–

13 & 94–1 Delta Air Lines; 94–44 American Airlines; 96–16

WestAir; 96–19 [Air Carrier]; 98–22 Northwest Airlines; 99–1

American; 99–12 TWA; 2000–6 Atlantic Coast Aviation.

108.7 ......................................................................................................... 90–18 & 90–19 Continental Airlines; 99–1 American.

108.9 ......................................................................................................... 98–22 Northwest Airlines; 2000–19 Horner.

108.10 ....................................................................................................... 96–16 WestAir.

108.11 ....................................................................................................... 90–23 Broyles; 90–26 Waddell; 91–3 Lewis; 92–46 Sutton-Sautter;

94–44 American Airlines.

108.13 ....................................................................................................... 90–12 & 90–19 Continental Airlines; 90–37 Northwest Airlines.

108.18 ....................................................................................................... 98–6 Continental Airlines; 99–12 TWA; 2000–6 Atlantic Coast Aviation.

121.133 ..................................................................................................... 90–18 Continental Airlines.

121.153 ..................................................................................................... 92–48 & 92–70 USAir; 95–11 Horizon; 96–3 American West Airlines; 96–24 Horizon; 96–25 USAir; 97–21 Delta; 97–30 Emery

Worldwide Airlines.

121.221 ..................................................................................................... 97–30 Emery Worldwide Airlines.

121.317 ..................................................................................................... 92–37 Giuffrida; 94–18 Luxemburg; 99–6 Squire; 99–16 Dorfman.

121.318 ..................................................................................................... 92–37 Giuffrida.

121.363 ..................................................................................................... 2000–13 Empire Airlines.

121.367 ..................................................................................................... 90–12 Continental Airlines; 96–25 USAir.

121.379 ..................................................................................................... 2000–13 Empire Airlines.

121.571 ..................................................................................................... 92–37 Giuffrida.

121.575 ..................................................................................................... 98–11 TWA.

121.577 ..................................................................................................... 98–11 TWA.

121.589 ..................................................................................................... 97–12 Mayer.

121.628 ..................................................................................................... 95–11 Horizon; 97–21 Delta; 97–30 Emery Worldwide Airlines.

121.693 ..................................................................................................... 99–13 Falcon Air Express.

121.697 ..................................................................................................... 99–13 Falcon Air Express.

135.1 ......................................................................................................... 95–8 Charter Airlines; 95–25 Conquest.

135.3 ......................................................................................................... 99–15 Blue Ridge; 2000–5 Blue Ridge.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices 67459

135.5 ......................................................................................................... 94–3 Valley Air; 94–20 Conquest Helicopters; 95–25 Conquest; 95–

27 Valley Air; 96–15 Valley Air.

135.25 ....................................................................................................... 92–10 Flight Unlimited; 94–3 Valley Air; 95–27 Valley Air; 96–15

Valley Air; 2000–3 Warbelow’s; 2000–14 Warbelow’s.

135.63 ....................................................................................................... 94–40 Polynesian Airways; 95–17 Larry’s Flying Service; 95–28 Atlantic; 96–4 South Aero; 99–7 Premier Jets.

135.87 ....................................................................................................... 90–21 Carroll.

135.95 ....................................................................................................... 95–17 Larry’s Flying Service; 99–15 Blue Ridge; 2000–5 Blue Ridge.

135.179 ..................................................................................................... 97–11 Hampton; 2000–3 Warbelow’s; 2000–14 Warbelow’s.

135.185 ..................................................................................................... 94–40 Polynesian Airways.

135.234 ..................................................................................................... 99–15 Blue Ridge; 2000–14 Warbelow’s.

135.243 ..................................................................................................... 99–11 Evergreen Helicopters; 99–15 Blue Ridge; 2000–5 Blue Ridge;

2000–12 Evergreen.

135.263 ..................................................................................................... 95–9 Charter Airlines; 96–4 South Aero.

135.267 ..................................................................................................... 95–8 Charter Airlines; 95–17 Larry’s Flying Service; 96–4 South

Aero.

135.293 ..................................................................................................... 95–17 Larry’s Flying Service; 96–4 South Aero; 99–15 Blue Ridge;

2000–5 Blue Ridge.

135.299 ..................................................................................................... 99–15 Blue Ridge; 2000–5 Blue Ridge.

135.343 ..................................................................................................... 95–17 Larry’s Flying Service; 99–15 Blue Ridge; 2000–5 Blue Ridge.

135.411 ..................................................................................................... 97–11 Hampton.

135.413 ..................................................................................................... 94–3 Valley Air; 96–15 Valley Air; 97–8 Pacific Av. d/b/a Inter-Island Helicopters; 97–16 Mauna Kea; 99–14 Alika Aviation.

135.421 ..................................................................................................... 93–36 Valley Air; 94–3 Valley Air; 96–15 Valley Air; 99–14 Alika

Aviation.

135.437 ..................................................................................................... 94–3 Valley Air; 96–15 Valley Air.

137.19 ....................................................................................................... 2000–12 Evergreen.

141.101 ..................................................................................................... 98–18 Green Aviation.

145.1 ......................................................................................................... 97–10 Alphin.

145.3 ......................................................................................................... 97–10 Alphin.

145.25 ....................................................................................................... 97–10 Alphin.

145.45 ....................................................................................................... 97–10 Alphin.

145.47 ....................................................................................................... 97–10 Alphin.

145.49 ....................................................................................................... 97–10 Alphin.

145.51 ....................................................................................................... 2000–1 Gatewood.

145.53 ....................................................................................................... 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories.

145.57 ....................................................................................................... 94–2 Woodhouse; 97–9 Alphin; 97–32 Florida Propeller.

145.61 ....................................................................................................... 90–11 Thunderbird Accessories.

191 ............................................................................................................ 90–12 & 90–19 Continental Airlines; 90–37 Northwest Airlines; 98–

6 Continental Airlines; 99–12 TWA.

298.1 ......................................................................................................... 92–10 Flight Unlimited.

302.8 ......................................................................................................... 90–22 USAir.

49 CFR

1.47 ........................................................................................................... 92–76 Safety Equipment.

171 et seq. ................................................................................................ 95–10 Diamond; 2000–20 Phillips Building Supply.

171.2 ......................................................................................................... 92–77 TCI; 94–28 Toyota; 94–31 Smalling; 95–16 Mulhall; 96–26

Midtown; 98–2 Carr.

171.8 ......................................................................................................... 92–77 TCI.

172.101 ..................................................................................................... 92–77 TCI; 94–28 Toyota; 94–31 Smalling; 96–26 Midtown.

172.200 ..................................................................................................... 92–77 TCI; 94–28 Toyota; 95–16 Mulhall; 96–26 Midtown; 98–2

Carr.

172.202 ..................................................................................................... 92–77 TCI; 94–28 Toyota; 94–31 Smalling; 95–16 Mulhall; 98–2

Carr.

172.203 ..................................................................................................... 94–28 Toyota.

172.204 ..................................................................................................... 92–77 TCI; 94–28 Toyota; 94–31 Smalling; 95–16 Mulhall; 98–2

Carr.

172.300 ..................................................................................................... 94–31 Smalling; 95–16 Mulhall; 96–26 Midtown; 98–2 Carr.

172.301 ..................................................................................................... 94–31 Smalling; 95–16 Mulhall; 98–2 Carr.

172.304 ..................................................................................................... 92–77 TCI; 94–31 Smalling; 95–16 Mulhall; 98–2 Carr.

172.400 ..................................................................................................... 92–77 TCI; 94–28 Toyota; 94–31 Smalling; 95–16 Mulhall; 98–2

Carr.

172.402 ..................................................................................................... 94–28 Toyota.

172.406 ..................................................................................................... 92–77 TCI.

173.1 ......................................................................................................... 92–77 TCI; 94–28 Toyota; 94–31 Smalling; 95–16 Mulhall; 98–2

Carr.

173.3 ......................................................................................................... 94–28 Toyota; 94–31 Smalling; 98–2 Carr.

173.6 ......................................................................................................... 94–28 Toyota.

173.22(a) ................................................................................................... 94–28 Toyota; 94–31 Smalling; 98–2 Carr.

173.24 ....................................................................................................... 94–28 Toyota; 95–16 Mulhall.

173.25 ....................................................................................................... 94–28 Toyota.

173.27 ....................................................................................................... 92–77 TCI.

173.62 ....................................................................................................... 98–2 Carr.

173.115 ..................................................................................................... 92–77 TCI.

173.240 ..................................................................................................... 92–77 TCI.

67460 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices

173.243 ..................................................................................................... 94–28 Toyota.

173.260 ..................................................................................................... 94–28 Toyota.

173.266 ..................................................................................................... 94–28 Toyota; 94–31 Smalling.

175.25 ....................................................................................................... 94–31 Smalling.

191.5 ......................................................................................................... 97–13 Westair Commuter.

191.7 ......................................................................................................... 97–13 Westair Commuter.

821.30 ....................................................................................................... 92–73 Wyatt.

821.33 ....................................................................................................... 90–21 Carroll.

STATUTES

5 U.S.C.:

504 ..................................................................................................... 90–17 Wilson; 91–17 & 92–71 KDS Aviation; 92–74, 93–2 & 93–9

Wendt; 93–29 Sweeney; 94–17 TCI; 95–27 Valley Air; 96–22

Woodhouse; 98–19 Martin & Jaworski.

552 ..................................................................................................... 90–12, 90–18 & 90–19 Continental Airlines; 93–10 Costello.

554 ..................................................................................................... 90–18 Continental Airlines; 90–21 Carroll; 95–12 Toyota.

556 ..................................................................................................... 90–21 Carroll; 91–54 Alaska Airlines.

557 ..................................................................................................... 90–20 Degenhardt; 90–21 Carroll; 90–37 Northwest Airlines; 94–28

Toyota.

705 ..................................................................................................... 95–14 Charter Airlines.

5332 ................................................................................................... 95–27 Valley Air.

11 U.S.C.:

362 ..................................................................................................... 91–2 Continental Airlines.

28 U.S.C.:

2412 ................................................................................................... 93–10 Costello; 96–22 Woodhouse.

2462 ................................................................................................... 90–21 Carroll.

49 U.S.C.:

5123 ................................................................................................... 95–16 Mulhall; 96–26 & 97–1 Midtown Neon Sign; 98–2 Carr; 2000–

20 Phillips Building Supply.

40102 ................................................................................................. 96–17 Fenner.

41706 ................................................................................................. 99–6 Squire.

44701 ................................................................................................. 96–6 Ignatov; 96–17 Fenner; 99–12 TWA; 2000–3 Warbelow’s.

44704 ................................................................................................. 96–3 America West Airlines; 96–15 Valley Air.

46110 ................................................................................................. 96–22 Woodhouse; 97–1 Midtown Neon Sign.

46301 ................................................................................................. 97–1 Midtown Neon Sign; 97–16 Mauna Kea; 97–20 Werle; 99–15

Blue Ridge; 2000–3 Warbelow’s.

46302 ................................................................................................. 98–24 Steven.

46303 ................................................................................................. 97–7 Stalling.

49 U.S.C. App.:

1301(31) (operate) ............................................................................. 93–18 Westair Commuter.

(32) (person) .............................................................................. 93–18 Westair Commuter.

1356 ................................................................................................... 90–18 & 90–19, 91–2 Continental Airlines.

1357 ................................................................................................... 90–18, 90–19, & 91–2 Continental Airlines; 91–41 [Airport Operator]; 91–58 [Airport Operator].

1421 ................................................................................................... 92–10 Flight Unlimited; 92–48 USAir; 92–70 USAir; 93–9 Wendt.

1429 ................................................................................................... 92–73 Wyatt.

1471 ................................................................................................... 89–5 Schultz; 90–10 Webb; 90–20 Degenhardt; 90–12, 90–18 & 90–

19 Continental Airlines; 90–23 Broyles; 90–26 & 90–43 Waddell;

90–33 Cato; 90–37 Northwest Airlines; 90–39 Hart; 91–2 Continental Airlines; 91–3 Lewis; 91–18 [Airport Operator]; 91–53

Koller; 92–5 Delta Air Lines; 92–10 Flight Unlimited 92–46 Sutton-Sautter; 92–51 Koblick; 92–74 Wendt; 92–76 Safety Equipment; 94–20 Conquest Helicopters; 94–40 Polynesian Airways;

96–6 Ignatov; 97–7 Stalling.

1472 ................................................................................................... 96–6 Ignatov.

1475 ................................................................................................... 90–20 Degenhardt; 90–12 Continental Airlines; 90–18, 90–19 & 91–1

Continental Airlines; 91–3 Lewis; 91–18 [Airport Operator]; 94–40

Polynesian Airways.

1486 ................................................................................................... 90–21 Carroll; 96–22 Woodhouse.

1809 ................................................................................................... 92–77 TCI; 94–19 Pony Express; 94–28 Toyota; 94–31 Smalling; 95–

12 Toyota.

FRCP

Rule 11 ..................................................................................................... 2000–17 Gotbetter.

Rule 26 ..................................................................................................... 2000–19 Horner.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices 67461

Civil Penalty Actions—Orders Issued

by the Administrator

Digests

(Issued between July 1, 2000, and

September 30, 2000)

The digests of the Administrator’s

final decisions and orders are arranged

by order number, and briefly summarize

key points of the decision. The

following compilation of digests

includes all final decisions and orders

issued by the Administrator from July 1,

2000, to September 30, 2000. The FAA

will publish non-cumulative

supplements to this compilation on a

quarterly basis (e.g., April, July,

October, and January of each year).

These digests do not constitute legal

authority, and should not be cited or

relied upon as such. The digests are not

intended to serve as a substitute for

proper legal research. Parties, attorneys,

and other interested persons should

always consult the full text of the

Administrator’s decisions before citing

them in any context.

In the Matter of David E. Everson,

d/b/a North Valley Helicopters

Order No. 2000–15 (8/7/00)

Appeal Dismissed. Complaint

withdrew its notice of appeal from the

law judge’s initial decision. Therefore,

Complainant’s appeal is dismissed.

In the Matter of Warbelow’s Air

Ventures, Inc.

Order No. 2000–16 (8/8/00)

Reconsideration Denied. Warbelow’s

filed a second, repetitive petition to

reconsider FAA Order No. 2000–3. The

Rules of Practice provide that the FAA

decisionmaker will not consider

repetitious petitions, and may

summarily dismiss them. 14 CFR

§ 13.234(d). Warbelow’s second petition

to reconsider is summarily dismissed as

repetitive.

In the Matter of Howard Gotbetter

Order No. 2000–17 (8/11/00)

Alleged Assault on Flight Attendant.

On appeal, Gotbetter argues that the

record does not support the law judge’s

finding that he assaulted a flight

attendant in violation of 14 CFR 91.11.

Credibility findings. The law judge’s

credibility findings will not be

overturned because Gotbetter has not

given any persuasive reason to do so.

Alleged Bias. Gotbetter argues that the

ALJ was biased against him. Gotbetter

claims that the law judge is in essence

‘‘a puppet’’ of the FAA, and FAA is in

turn a puppet of the airlines. Gotbetter

is wrong; the law judge is not an

employee of the FAA. The United States

Department of Transportation employs

the law judge.

Gotbetter also contends that the law

judge was improperly ‘‘cozy’’ with

agency counsel because the law judge

renewed his acquaintance with agency

counsel after the hearing and discussed

agency counsel’s new baby. Merely

making small talk with counsel does not

rise to the level of a showing of bias.

‘‘Guilt by Association.’’ Gotbetter

argues that the law judge unfairly

penalized him for the actions of his

traveling companion. This argument is

rejected—the law judge specifically

declined to hold Gotbetter responsible

for his traveling companion’s actions.

Conclusion. The law judge’s decision

assessing a $500 civil penalty is

affirmed.

In the Matter of California Helitech

Order No. 2000–18 (8/11/00)

Operating helicopters with open

discrepancies on the squawk sheets.

California Helitech, a helicopter pilot

school certificated under Part 141,

operated two helicopters with open

maintenance discrepancies on the

squawk sheets. The law judge held that

California Helitech violated 14 CFR

91.405(a) and (b) and assessed a $2,200

civil penalty.

Airworthiness. Complainant did not

allege that the helicopters were

unairworthy. The law judge precluded

the introduction of testimony regarding

whether the helicopters were airworthy

at the hearing. Nonetheless, he held in

the initial decision that California

Helitech operated the helicopters in an

unairworthy condition. The

Administrator reversed the law judge’s

ruling that the helicopters were

unairworthy. The Administrator held

the finding was unfair in light of the

preclusion of evidence at the hearing,

and it was unnecessary in light of the

absence of any allegation that the

helicopters were operated in an

unairworthy condition.

The Administrator rejected California

Helitech’s argument that there should

have been no finding of violations

because the squawk sheets are required

under Part 141 but Complainant did not

prove that the flights were conducted

under Part 141. The Administrator held

that while the squawk sheet is a Part

141 form, the requirement to repair and

make appropriate entries in

maintenance records arose under Part

91. Regardless of the format of the

discrepancy listing, Section 91.405’s

requirements still apply.

Sequestering of Witnesses. The law

judge granted the motion to sequester

the witnesses at the beginning of the

hearing. Complainant’s witness,

Inspector Magill, testified during

Complainant’s case-in-chief, and again

as a rebuttal witness, but he was not

sequestered during the testimony of the

other witnesses. The Administrator held

that California Helitech should have

objected at the hearing so that the law

judge would have had an opportunity to

bar the inspector from retaking the

witness stand. Moreover, there was

little, if any, need to sequester Inspector

Magill because on rebuttal he testified

primarily as an expert, not a percipient,

witness.

Civil Penalty Appropriate Despite

California Helitech’s Surrender of its

Part 141 Certificate. The need for a

sanction with a punitive and deterrent

effect is not obviated by California

Helitech’s voluntary surrender of its

pilot school certificate.

Sanction. The Administrator affirmed

the $2,200 civil penalty, finding it to be

reasonable in light of the proven

violations.

In the Matter of James J. Horner

Order No. 2000–19 (8/11/00)

Alleged entering of sterile area

without submitting to screening. Horner

was late for a flight. He presented his

carry-on bag for x-ray inspection at the

security checkpoint. The screener, who

was unable to determine the nature of

one of the objects inside the bag, handed

it to a bag checker for a physical search.

Horner ‘‘grabbed’’ the bag from the bag

checker even though the search was not

finished and set off for the gate. The

supervisor called out to Horner to stop,

but he did not. A screener followed him

to the gate and told the ticket agent not

to let him board because his bag had not

been searched thoroughly. The screener

asked Horner if he could search the bag,

and Horner agreed, but he threw it on

the ground and kicked it. He was

verbally abusive appeared extremely

angry and scary. The screener searched

the bag and found nothing threatening.

The law judge held that Horner violated

14 CFR 107.20 and assessed a $750 civil

penalty.

Alleged Lack of Fair Hearing. On

appeal, Horner argued that the agency

attorney violated FRCP Rule 26 by

failing to provide him, within 30 days

before the hearing, a list of evidence the

agency might introduce at the hearing.

Horner contends he did not present any

witnesses because he thought the

agency would not present any evidence.

The FRCP do not apply in FAA civil

penalty proceedings, and the FAA civil

penalty rules of practice do not contain

a provision that mandates disclosure

67462 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices

without a discovery request. Horner was

free to submit discovery requests to the

agency attorney, but he failed to do so.

His claim that he was denied a fair

hearing is rejected.

Lateness of Initial Decision. Horner

also argued that the case against him

should have been dismissed because the

law judge failed to issue a decision

within 30 days after the hearing, as

required by 14 CFR 13.232(c). The law

judge’s decision was issued

approximately 3 months late. Horner

has neither asserted nor shown any

prejudice resulting from the delay. He

could have moved to compel the law

judge to issue the decision, but did not.

Conclusion. The Administrator

affirmed law judge’s decision assessing

a $750 civil penalty.

In the Matter of Phillips Building Supply

Order No. 2000–20 (8/11/00)

Hazardous Materials. In this case, five

1-gallon cans of Formica glue were

shipped aboard a UPS cargo plane

without proper packaging, labeling,

marking, and without complying with

other requirements of the Hazardous

Materials Regulations. The shipment

was found leaking in a UPS facility. The

agency attorney sought a $20,000 civil

penalty, but the law judge reduced it to

$9,000, and the agency attorney

appealed.

Sanction. The law judge improperly

used a mathematical, formulaic

approach of multiplying the number of

violations by a set dollar amount. This

was not appropriate, as a violation of

one regulation may be more or less

serious than of another.

The law judge improperly reduced the

$20,000 proposed civil penalty to

$9,000 because of Phillips’ first effort at

training. While it was a corrective

measure justifying a reduction, it

deserves only a minor one. Phillips’

own witness characterized the training

as ‘‘cursory.’’

Further, the law judge improperly

reduced the civil penalty based on

Phillips’ attorney’s statement that he

advised his client of the need for further

training. There was no indication that

Phillips accepted its attorney’s advice.

Moreover, further training after a

hearing would be so long after the

incident that it could not be regarded as

a mitigating factor. Also, it is beyond the

authority of the law judge to impose a

training requirement as part of the

sanction; the law judge’s authority is

limited to imposing a civil penalty.

In addition, the law judge improperly

based his sanction determination in part

on Phillips’ promise not to ship

hazardous materials any more. The case

law indicates that a promise not to ship

hazardous materials in the future does

not represent the type of positive

corrective action that warrants

consideration in determining the

penalty. Such a company policy may be

changed at any time.

After considering all the factors

required by the statute—

1. the nature, circumstances, extent,

and gravity of the violation (undeclared

shipments pose a special risk and are

extremely dangerous; FAA inspector’s

testimony that given the closed

ventilation system, if the glue leaked,

vapors could cause crew to succumb;

the package actually leaked, and onto

some food, which could have caused

people to get sick if they ingested it; on

the other hand, it was a relatively small

shipment; it was not flammable,

corrosive, or radioactive);

2. the violator’s degree of culpability,

any history of prior violations, the

ability to pay, and any effect on the

ability to continue to do business

(Phillips is a business rather than an

individual; while it is not a

manufacturer, it regularly handles

hazardous materials; prior violations are

not present; and Phillips has not alleged

financial hardship); and

3. other matters that justice requires

(Phillips did take some corrective

action—i.e., two employees participated

in a UPS training course; this doesn’t

justify a large adjustment, but it is still

mitigating).

Conclusion. Based on the statutory

factors, the $9,000 civil penalty assessed

by the law judge is too low, but the

$20,000 sought by Complainant is

excessive. A $14,000 civil penalty is

imposed.

In the Matter of Daniel A. Martinez

Order No. 2000–21 (8/11/00)

Untimely Supplemental Brief

Rejected. Order No. 2000–7 directed

Martinez to file a supplemental brief

explaining why he failed to answer the

complaint and the law judge’s order to

show cause. Martinez lacked good cause

for failing to file his supplemental brief

by the deadline. Thus, his supplemental

brief is rejected.

Community Service. In any event, the

relief Martinez sought on appeal—to

substitute community service for the

civil penalty—is not available. The

governing statute and regulations

provide only for monetary penalties in

FAA civil penalty actions; they do not

provide for community service as a

possible penalty.

Conclusion. Martinez’s appeal is

dismissed, the law judge’s initial

decision is affirmed, and a civil penalty

of $2,200 is assessed.

Commercial Reporting Services of the

Administrator’s Civil Penalty Decision

and Orders

Commercial Publications: The

Administrator’s decisions and orders in

civil penalty cases are available in the

following commercial publications:

Civil Penalty Cases Digest Service,

published by Hawkins Publishing

Company, Inc., P.O. Box 480, Mayo,

MD, 21106, (410) 798–1677;

Federal Aviation Decisions, Clark

Boardman Callaghan, a subsidiary of

West Information Publishing Company,

50 Broad Street East, Rochester, NY

14694, 1–800–211–9428.

2. On-Line Services.The

Administrator’s decisions and orders in

civil penalty cases are available through

the following on-line services:

• Westlaw (the Database ID is

FTRAN–FAA)

• LEXIS [Transportation (TRANS)

Library, FAA file.]

• Compuserve

• FedWorld

Docket

The FAA Hearing Docket is located at

FAA Headquarters, 800 Independence

Avenue, SW, Room 926A, Washington,

DC, 20591 (tel. no. 202–267–3641). The

clerk of the FAA Hearing Docket is Ms.

Stephanie McClain. All documents that

are required to be filed in civil penalty

proceedings must be filed with the FAA

hearing Docket Clerk at the FAA

Hearing Docket. (See 14 CFR 13.210.)

Materials contained in the docket of any

case not containing sensitive security

information (protected by 14 CFR Part

191) may be viewed at the FAA Hearing

Docket.

In addition, materials filed in the FAA

Hearing Docket in non-security cases in

which the complaints were filed on or

after December 1, 1997, are available for

inspection at the Department of

Transportation Docket, located at 400

7th Street, SW, Suite PL–401,

Washington, DC, 20590, (tel. no. 202–

366–9329.) While the originals are

retained in the FAA Hearing Docket, the

DOT Docket scans copies of documents

in non-security cases in which the

complaint was filed after December 1,

1997, into their computer database.

Individuals who have access to the

Internet can view the materials in these

dockets using the following Internet

address: http://dms.dot.gov.

FAA Offices

The Administrator’s decisions and

orders, indexes, and digests are

available for public inspection and

copying at the following location in

FAA headquarters:

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices 67463

FAA Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation

Administration, 800 Independence

Avenue, SW., Room 926A,

Washington, DC 20591; (202) 267–

3641

These materials are also available at

all FAA regional and center legal offices

at the following locations:

Office of the Regional Counsel for the

Aeronautical Center (AMC–7), Mike

Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500

South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma

City, OK 73169; (405) 954–3296

Office of the Regional Counsel for the

Alaskan Region (AAL–7), Alaskan

Region Headquarters, 222 West 7th

Avenue, Anchorage, AL 99513; (907)

271–5269

Office of the Regional Counsel for the

Central Region (ACE–7), Central

Region Headquarters, 601 East 12th

Street, Federal Building, Kansas City,

MO 64106; (816) 426–5446

Office of the Regional Counsel for the

Eastern Region (AEA–7), 1 Aviation

Plaza, 159–30 Rockaway Blvd.,

Springfield Gardens, NY 11434; (718)

533–3285

Office of the Regional Counsel for the

Great Lakes Region (AGL–7), Great

Lakes Region Headquarters, O’Hare

Lake Office Center, 2300 East Devon

Avenue, Suite 419, Des Plaines, IL

60019: (847) 294–7085

Office of the Regional Counsel for the

New England Region (ANE–7), New

England Regional Headquarters, 12

New England Executive Park, Room

401, Burlington, MA 01803; (781)

238–7040

Office of the Regional Counsel for the

Northwest Mountain Region (ANM–

7), Northwest Mountain Region

Headquarters, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW,

Renton, WA 98055; (425) 227–2007

Office of the Regional Counsel for the

Southern Region (ASO–7), Southern

Region Headquarters, 1701 Columbia

Avenue, College Park, GA 30337;

(404) 305–5200

Office of the Regional Counsel for the

Southwest Region (ASW–7),

Southwest Region Headquarters, 2601

Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX

76137; (817) 222–5064

Office of the Regional Counsel for the

Technical Center (ACT–7), William J.

Hughes Technical Center, Atlantic

City International Airport, Atlantic

City, NJ 08405; (609) 485–7088

Office of the Regional Counsel for the

Western-Pacific Region (AWP–7),

Western-Pacific Region Headquarters,

15000 Aviation Boulevard,

Hawthorne, CA 90261; (310) 725–

71000

Issued in Washington, DC on October 31,

2000.

James S. Dillman,

Assistant Chief Counsel for Litigation.

[FR Doc. 00–28850 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE–2000–62]

Petitions for Exemption; Summary of

Petitions Received; Dispositions of

Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for

exemption received and of dispositions

of prior petitions.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking

provisions governing the application,

processing, and disposition of petitions

for exemption Part 11 of title 14, Code

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this

notice contains a summary of certain

petitions seeking relief from specified

requirements of 14 CFR, dispositions of

certain petitions previously received,

and corrections. The purpose of this

notice is to improve the public’s

awareness of, and participation in, this

aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities.

Neither publication of this notice nor

the inclusion or omission of information

in the summary is intended to affect the

legal status of any petition or its final

disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received

must identify the petition docket

number involved and must be received

on or before November 29, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on any

petition in triplicate to: Federal

Aviation Administration, Office of the

Chief Counsel, Attn: Rule Docket (AGC–

200), Petition Docket No. lll, 800

Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC 20591.

The petition, any comments received,

and a copy of any final disposition are

filed in the assigned regulatory docket

and are available for examination in the

Rules Docket (AGC–200), Room 915G,

FAA Headquarters Building (FOB 10A),

800 Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)

267–3132.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Forest Rawls (202) 267–8033, or

Vanessa Wilkins (202) 267–8029, Office

of Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal

Aviation Administration, 800

Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC 20591.

This notice is published pursuant to

§§ 11.85 and 11.91 of part 11 of 14 CFR.

Issued in Washington, DC, on November 3,

2000.

Donald P. Byrne,

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

Dispositions of Petitions

Docket No.: 28530.

Petitioner: Mr. John A. Porter.

Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14

CFR 91.109(a) and (b)(3).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To allow Mr. Porter to

conduct certain flight instruction and

simulated instrument flights to meet

recent instrument experience

requirements, in certain Beechcraft

airplanes equipped with a functioning

throwover control wheel in place of

functioning dual controls.

Grant, 10/06/00, Exemption No.

6521B.

Docket No.: 28514.

Petitioner: Mr. Henry D. Canterbury.

Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14

CFR 91.109(a) and (b)(3).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To allow Mr. Canterbury to

conduct certain flight instruction and

simulated instrument flights to meet

recent instrument experience

requirements in certain Beechcraft

airplanes equipped with a functioning

throwover control wheel in place of

functioning dual controls.

Grant, 10/05/00, Exemption No.

6520B.

Docket No.: 29922.

Petitioner: Mr. Richard E. Druschel.

Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14

CFR 91.109(a) and (b)(3).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: .To allow Mr. Druschel to

conduct certain flight instruction and

simulated instrument flights to meet

recent instrument experience

requirements in certain Beechcraft

airplanes equipped with a functioning

throwover control wheel in lieu of

functioning dual controls.

Grant, 10/06/00, Exemption No. 7367.

Docket No.: 29937.

Petitioner: Southern California

Aviation, Inc.

Section of the 14 CFR Affected: 14

CFR 145.35 and 145.37(b).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit SCAI to add

transport category airplanes up to and

including the Boeing 747–400 airplane

to its FAA-certificated repair station

limited airframe rating without

completely meeting the housing and

facility requirements for such airplanes.

Grant, 10/06/00, Exemption No. 7364.

[FR Doc. 00–28738 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M