P.1 

OAR Box 1500 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

52) ll-C-78 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/5/2008 1:51:29 PM Sheet 52 of 343 
P.2 

r 

WI PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC. 

I a 

^z-1996 

A-94-52 

Central Park West 

5001 South Miami Boulevard, Suite 300 

P.O. Box 12077 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2077 

(919)941-0333 

FAX (919) 941-0234 

FAX COMMUNICATION 

Date: ////1/f7 

FROM: Jttctini'f f^tcf Osf 

TO: Name: 

Address: 

3o k> 1^4 £<>\r<ls 

c r/i 

-i 

ncr 

fcH* /-.ir-t uOCKcT 

Phone Number: 

FAX NUMBER: (? >5) 7? I - 066 $ 

REFERENCE CODE: A*?0/- **) 

THIS COMMUNICATION COMPRISES £ PAGES INCLUDING THIS PAGE. 

COMMENTS: &'*>. 

)hloifr><*bor-s j0-< OUs+ lie*CJ+* £us 2f /ft7 

yytfXf // >->-7 J fo r?f&* **c*- ( *tf. 

'&*T^ f 

WASHINQTON. D.C. • RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC • LOS ANQELES, CA • CINCINNATI. OH 
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. 

Project No. N801 • Reinforced Plastic / Composites NESHAP 

Table 1: Comparison of the Different Reinforced Plastic / Composites MACT Model Equations. 

WAT 7 

Does Equation Meets 

Adoptability Criteria? 

2nd Order Polynomial. 

y = m,x' • m,x • b (b°0 ) 

i^fflP^P^STEiiui^oi^^^^^^^^^^Sg^^r: 

sKssa^a^^s t^msas^ii^aMH^assasaj^ 

y = m, x (%HAP)' + m, x (%HAP) y = c, x m, x (%HAP) + c, x m, HAP emitted 

HAP emitted 

increases as % HAP increases. 

not equal to zero at zero % HAP. 

No 

Power, y = mx* + b 

(n ° constant, b = 0) 

y = m,x(%HAP)' y = c,xm,x(%HAP)" HAP emitted 

HAP emitted 

increases as % HAP increases. 

equal to zero at zero % HAP. 

Yes 

Linear: y = mx + b 

(b = constant) 

y = m, x (%HAP) • b y = cxm . + c,xb/ (%HAP) HAP emitted 

HAP emitted 

decreases as % HAP inaeases. 

equal to infinity at zero % HAP. 

No 

Linear: y = mx • b 

(b°0) 

y = m,x(%HAP) y = cxm. HAP emitted 

HAP emitted 

remains constant as % HAP increases. 

equals a constant at zero % HAP. 

No 

Note 1: The equations shown above are possible equations to be used in a MACT model point value system designed to accurately reflect emission reduction credits to the various emission reduction techniques that a facility could 

chose to meet the MACT standard. The equations shown should not be used for predicting emissions. 

Note 2: Criteria for acceptability: 1.) equation must produce zero emissions @ 0% HAP content and 2.) Increasing emissions with increasing HAP content, when expressing emissions in lbs HAP/ton resin end. lbs HAP/lbs Available HAP. 

Note 3: Equations for Emissions as lbs HAP/lbs Available HAP obtained by dividing Equations for Emissions as lbs HAP/ton Resin by the % HAP/100. 

Note 4: Discussion assumes constant resin tonnage. 

Table 2: Comparison of the MACT Model Results Obtained from the 2nd Order Polynomial Equation, Power Equation and Linear Equation (b * 0) Compared 

to the MACT Model Results Obtained from the Linear Equation where b a constant for Manual and Mechanical Resin Applications. 

IIB*3tSrfT8SlM^ 

I* 

0.0 

5.0 

10.0 

15 0 

20.0 

25 0 

300 

35.0 

40.0 

45 0 

50.0 

0 

5 

13 

24 

38 

54 

74 

96 

122 

150 

181 

N/A 

200% 

200% 

200% 

68% 

20% 

5% 

~ 0% 

1% 

1% 

4% 

0 

3 

10 

21 

35 

52 

72 

-94 

119 

146 

176 

N/A 

200% 

200% 

200% 

62% 

16% 

2% 

2% 

3% 

1% 

1% 

0 

15 

30 

45 

60 

75 

90 

105 

120 

135 

149 

N/A 

200% 

200% 

200% 

105% 

51% 

24% 

8% 

2% 

10% 

15% 

0 

0 

0 

0 : 

19 

44 

70 

98 

122 

148 

174 ' 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

23 

73 

138 

217 

312 

422 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

200% 

28% 

0% 

1% 

3% 

9% 

0 

0 

2 

8 

22 

46 

84 

•139 

216 

319 

452 

N/A 

200% 

200% 

200% 

200% 

200% 

42% 

1% 

2% 

5% 

16% 

0 

26 

52 

78 

104 

129 

155 

181 

-207 

233 

259 

N/A 

200% 

200% 

200% 

200% 

200% 

96% 

27% 

6% -

26% 

40% 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

55 

138 

220-

303 

386 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

Table 3: Comparison of the MACT Model Results Obtained from the 2nd Order Polynomial Equation, Power Equation and Linear Equation (b = 0) Compared 

to the MACT Model Results Obtained from the Linear Equation where b • constant for Filament Winding and Gel Coat Applications. 

N/A 

5.0 14 200% 10 200% 20 200% N/A 17 200% 11 200% 52 200% N/A 

10.0 30 148% 26 141% 40 160% N/A 44 200% 36 200% 104 200% N/A 

15.0 47 45% 43 37% 60 67% 30 N/A 82 200% 75 200% 155 200% N/A 

20.0 66 18% 63 13% 80 36% 55 N/A 131 65% 125 62% 207 103% 66 N/A 

25.0 86 6% 84 4% 100 21% 81 N/A 190 19% 186 16% 259 48% 158 N/A 

30.0 108 1% 106 0% 119 12% 106 N/A 260 4% 258 3% 311 22% 250 N/A 

'•iSJOi 131S :;4%* ;13oy ^1%" 139. -vkj !=«2< N/A- J3413 <;o%5; ^339;: a0%3 J&Zi i?6%3 *H5 i 3»/'A: 

!;J.?j40.oy ;.1tW?

. rf.1%*; MM'' y2%v 159-

;

"1%f £I»M N/A P33y '•iVkl 8431* mm VA.M S45CS •3433* %HM< 

?4fc0> ;il8l* asi%% SIBO:% ii% " '179^ ;-2%J ;1BSyi N/A 535 2% 532 1% 466 12% 524 N/A 

50.0 209 0% 206 1% 199 4% 208 N/A 648 5% 641 4% 518 17% 616 N/A 

Note 5: Percent Difference (% Diff.) is defined as {[|(a - b)| / (0.5 x (a+b))] x 100). 

Note 6: BokJed and shaded emission and percent difference values are values within the HAP content range tested by the Composite Fabricators Association (CFA). 

TJ 

CO 
ypfrTT 

Reinforced Plastic/Composites MACT Model for Manual Resin Application 

^P 

tn 

<D 

Ct 

c 

o 

+•» 

CL 

< 

X 

tn 

A 

tn 

c 

o '35 

tn 

1 

UJ 

CL 

< 

X 

200 

180 

160 

140 

120 

100 

10 15 20 25 30 

Resin Monomer Content (% HAP) 

35 40 45 

a 

X 

0.041 in./15min./50fpm 

0.088 inV15 min750 fpm 

O 0.041 in./15min./100 fpm 

- 0.088 in/15 minV100fpm 

A 

O 

0.041 in./30 min./50 fpm 

0.088 in./30 minV50 fpm 

X 

+ 

0.041 inV30 min./100 fpm 

0.088 in./30min7100 fpm 

- 2nd Order Poly. 

50 

TI 

4^ 
y/fArr'-

Reinforced Plastic/Composites MACT Model for Gel Coat Application 

700 

600 

^ 

c 

CO 

Q> 

Ct 

c 

o 

+* 

a. 

< 

X 

mQ 

"-^ 

tn 

c o 

CO 

CO 

E 

LU 

QL 

< X 

500 

400 

300 

200 

100 

10 15 20 25 30 35 

Resin Monomer Content (% HAP) 

40 45 

O 0.018 in/10 min/2 lbs per min. o 0.018 in 710 min/4 lbs per min. A 0.018 in./20 min/2 lbs per min. x 0.018 in./20 min/4 lbs per min. 

X 0.024 in/10 min/2 lbs per min. - 0.024 in./10 min/4 lbs per min. O 0.024 in./20 min/2 lbs per min. + 0.024 in/20 min/4 lbs per min. 

Linear (b = 0) tjnear (b * constant) Power (n = constant) 2nd Order Poly. 

50 

-a 
y/r/trr7

" 

Reinforced Plastic/Composites MACT Model for Mechanical Resin Application 

450 

400 

-7=- 350 

< ^ 

Res AP/ton (IbsH ssions 

A

P Emis 

X 

300 

2b0 

200 

150 

100 

50 

10 15 20 25 30 

Resin Monomer Content (% HAP) 

35 40 45 50 

O 0.040 in/15 min/2 lbs per min. © 0.040 in715 min74 lbs per min. A 0.040 in./30 min./2 lbs per min. x 0.040 in730 min74 lbs per min. 

X 0.080 in/15 min/2 lbs per min. • 0.080in715min74 lbs per min. o 0.080 in730 min./2 lbs per min. + 0.080 in./30 min74 lbs per min. 

Linear (b = 0) Linear (b » constant) Power (n = constant) 2nd Order Poly. 

TD 
^/PA'TT 

Reinforced Plastic/Composites MACT Model for Filament Winding Application 

250 

150 

200 

co fi 

s 

c 

o 

< 

X 

CO 

JO 

tn 

< T ^ | 100 

CO I 

UJ 

CL 

< 

X 

50 

Linear (fr = p) 

3.9804X.; 

-~— : : .- - -.:.. 

tear (b = constant) 

!^0889xV:46.4333J 

Order Polynomial 

:'a0293x2^2.7145x 

The equations shown.are possible equations to be used 

MACT model'point ".value system designed to 

accurately reflect er 

various emission rec 

could choose to rr 

equations shown sh 

emissions. 

luction credits to the 

.cility 

The 

od for predicting 

10 15 20 25 30 

Resin Monomer Content (%HAP) 

35 40 45 50 

O 73 degrees/6 inches o 73 degrees/33 inches A 85 degrees/6 inches x 85 degrees/33 inches 

Linear (b = 0) Linear (b • constant) Power (n = constant) 2nd Order Poly.