alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.1








Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The
      following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q
      for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of Hub Group, Inc. pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be deemed
      filed
      pursuant to any provision of the Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities
      law.




Each
      of
      the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Hub Group, Inc.




/s/David
                P. Yeager
              David
                P. Yeager
              Vice
                Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
              Hub
                Group, Inc.
            /s/Terri
                A. Pizzuto
              Terri
                A. Pizzuto
              Executive
                Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
              Hub
                Group, Inc.
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Amended Annual Report of Entrust Financial Services, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2001 as
filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report). I, David A. Hite, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 USC § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ David A. Hite
David A. Hite, Chief Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------

Dated: MARCH
13, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         312,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               36,684,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,075,000
<INVENTORY>                                 34,367,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            74,684,000
<PP&E>                                      93,257,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,680,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             199,037,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       73,302,000
<BONDS>                                    125,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,790,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               199,037,000
<SALES>                                     82,169,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            82,169,000
<CGS>                                       65,997,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               65,997,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,520,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,216,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,200,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,200,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,200,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)


</TABLE>
CONSULTING AGREEMENT

As  of  July  21,  2000 I have been engaged as a consultant  with
Elast  Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"). In that  role  I  have
advised and will continue to advise the Company concerning  bona-
fide  business  matters  as generally  described  below.  I  will
receive,  as  part of my compensation for these services,  common
stock  of  the  Company in an amount to be determined.  I  hereby
acknowledge the following representations to the Company.

I certify that I have not, and do not intend to, consult with or
advise the Company, as part of this Agreement, in connection with
the offer or sale of its securities in a capital-raising
transaction, and have not and will not directly or indirectly
promote or maintain a market for the Company's securities. I
enter into this agreement as a natural person on my own behalf,
not on behalf of any corporation, partnership, or other entity.

Signed this 21st day of July, 2000,




/s/ Edward Meyer, Jr.
          Signature


Edward Meyer, Jr.
          Print Name

General Services to be provided:

    Consulting  Services. Effective as of July 21,  2000  by  and
subject  to  the  terms and conditions herein  contained,  Edward
Meyer,   Jr.   and  Edward  T.  Whelan  shall  provide   business
management, marketing consulting and advisory services  to  ESTG.
Such  services  shall include (a) the preparation, implementation
and  monitoring  of  business  and marketing  plans,  (b)  advice
concerning  production layout and planning and internal  controls
and  (c)  such  other managerial assistance  as  XAI  shall  deem
necessary or appropriate for ESTG's business.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 18

Expressing the sense of Congress that the laws that apply to the private

sector and the other branches of the Federal Government should apply

to Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1993

Mr. GOSS (for himself, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. PETRI, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. HEFLEY, and Mr. KLUG) submitted the

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the laws that apply

to the private sector and the other branches of the Federal Government should apply to Congress.

Whereas the declining credibility of Congress has affected the

spirit of our Nation;

Whereas an increasing number of American people perceive

Members of Congress as placing their interests before

those of the Nation;

Whereas Congress has notably exempted itself from major

laws governing the private sector and the other branches

of the Federal Government; and

Whereas Congress might enact more workable laws if those

laws also applied to Congress itself: Now, therefore, be it
2

•HCON 18 IH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that Con3 gress is not exempt from the laws that it enacts and

4 should govern itself according to the laws that apply to

5 the private sector and the other branches of the Federal

6 Government.

Æ
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 114

Relative to the President’s program of program cuts and tax increases.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 30, 1993

Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Government Operations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Relative to the President’s program of program cuts and

tax increases.

Whereas on February 17, 1993, President Clinton outlined in

a state of the Union speech a program for increased

spending and deficit reduction including new programs,

spending cuts and taxes;

Whereas the 1990 budget agreement provides that there will

be no increased expenditures without matching offsets or

additional revenues unless an emergency is declared;

Whereas it would be unwise to declare an emergency under

existing circumstances;

Whereas it would be unwise to provide for additional expenditures in a piecemeal fashion without simultaneously providing for appropriate offsets in budget cuts and or additional revenues;
2

•HCON 114 IH

Whereas it would be unwise to take any piecemeal action

which would add to the deficit; and

Whereas legislation to cut existing programs and to increase

taxes would most likely be the most difficult part of any

new legislative program: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it be the sense of the Congress that no

3 action should be taken on any legislative proposal on the

4 President’s program unless it is a unified package contain5 ing offsets for any additional expenditures through cuts

6 in programs or increased taxes.

Æ
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in LocalRule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-31194

(Summary Calendar)

WALTER T. SILMON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

J. HERBERT BOYDSTUN; ROBERT P.

MCCLEOD; R. L. DAVIS, JR.; PATRICK

L. SPENCER; MALCOLM E. MADDOX;

HIBERNIA CORP., also known as Bancorp,

As Successor to First Bancorp of Louisiana, Inc.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(CA-94-1031)

August 26, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Walter T. Silmon appeals to this court the district court’s judgment granting summary

judgment regarding his securities fraud claims and the order dismissing his RICO claims. Having

reviewed the pertinent parts of the record and briefs of counsel and finding no actionable claims, on
2

the basis of the facts as found, authorities cited, and scholarly analysis of the district court entered

October 31, 1995, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7807

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROOSEVELT BROADUS, a/k/a Supreme, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-91-209-G, CA-97-965-1) Submitted: May 19, 2000 Decided: June 1, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cheryl Johns Sturm, Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, for Appellant.Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Roosevelt Broadus seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Broadus , Nos. CR-91-209-G; CA-97-965-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

   Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of
ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such periods and
the results of operations of the Company for such periods.




                                      /s/  Bami Bastani
                                      ----------------------------
Dated:  November 1, 2002              Bami Bastani
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer






                                      /s/ Thomas C. Shields
                                      ----------------------------
                                      Thomas C. Shields
                                      Senior Vice President and
                                      Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          17,192
<SECURITIES>                                       534
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     42,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,775
<PP&E>                                          10,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,814
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,928
<SALES>                                        116,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,018
<CGS>                                          101,182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,226
<INCOME-TAX>                                       466
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                760
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       760
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67358-67359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28840]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-6612-5]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7167 or www.epa.gov/oeca/ofa.
    Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements filed October 30, 
2000 through November 3, 2000 pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 000374, FINAL EIS, FHW, CA, US-7 Expressway Project, 
Construction between CA-98 to Interstate 8, Improve Access to the new 
Calexico East Port of Entry, Funding and COE Section 404 Permit, 
Imperial County, CA, Due: December 4, 2000, Contact: Jeffery S. Lewis 
(916) 498-5035. This Notice of Availability should have appeared in the 
11/3/2000 FR. The Official Wait Period

[[Page 67359]]

began on 11/3/2000 and ends on 12/4/2000.
EIS No. 000375, DRAFT EIS, NPS, WA, Mount Rainier National Park General 
Management Plan, Implementation, Pierce and Lewis Counties, WA, Due: 
February 9, 2001, Contact: Eric Walkinshaw (360) 589-2211.
EIS No. 000376, FINAL EIS, AFS, ID, Goose Creek Watershed Project, 
Harvesting Timber and Improve Watershed, Payette National Forest, New 
Meadows Ranger District, Adams County, ID, Due: December 26, 2000, 
Contact: Kimberly Brandel (208) 347-0300.
EIS No. 000377, FINAL EIS, COE, MO, Chesterfield Valley Flood Control 
Study, Improvement Flood Protection, City of Chesterfield, St. Louis 
County, MO, Due: December 11, 2000, Contact: Deborah Foley (314) 331-
8485.
EIS No. 000378, DRAFT EIS, FHW, VA, I-73 Location Study, Between 
Roanoke and the North Carolina State Line Commonwealth of Virginia, 
Construction and Operation, Bedford, Botetourt, Franklin, Henry and 
Roanoke Counties, Cities of Roanoke and Martinsville, VA, Due: January 
5, 2001, Contact: J. Bruce Turner (804) 775-3320.
EIS No. 000379, FINAL EIS, COE, WA, Programmatic Green/Duwamish River 
Basin Restoration Program, Capitol Improvement Type Program and 
Ecological Health, King County, WA, Due: December 11, 2000, Contact: 
Patrick Cagney (206) 764-6577.
EIS No. 000380, DRAFT EIS, NRC, GA, Generic EIS--Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear 
Plant, Unit 1 and 2, License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 4 to 
NUREG-1437, Altamaha River, Appling County, GA, Due: January 24, 2001, 
Contact: Andrew J. Kugler (301) 415-2828.

    Dated: November 6, 2000.
Ken Mittelholtz,
Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 00-28840 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

____________

No. 23-60369

Summary Calendar

____________

Akecheta Morningstar, PH.D, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

St. Dominic-Jackson Memorial Hospital; Dr. Sagar 

Patel; Global Medical Response, 

Defendants—Appellees.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:22-CV-410

______________________________

Before Jones, Higginson, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:

*

Akecheta Morningstar, PH.D., seeks leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis (IFP) on appeal. He argues that the district court erred in 

dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and in denying his motion for leave to amend his 

complaint. Because Morningstar has not demonstrated that he will raise a 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 30, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-60369 Document: 00517050287 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/30/2024
No. 23-60369

2

nonfrivolous issue on appeal, his motion to proceed IFP is DENIED. See

Fed. R. App. P. 24(a); Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 

202 n.24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Morningstar’s motions to void the district 

court’s order dismissing his complaint and to recuse certain judges of this 

court are DENIED.

Case: 23-60369 Document: 00517050287 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/30/2024
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As
adopted pursuant to
SECTION 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Audax Credit
BDC Inc. (the “Company”) for the period January 29, 2015 (date of inception) through December 31, 2015 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard T. Joseph, as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1)	The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)	The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Richard T. Joseph |                         | 
|--------------------- | ----------------------- | 
|Name:                 | Richard T. Joseph       | 
|Title:                | Chief Financial Officer | 



Date: March 22, 2016
ACCEPTED 14-14-00924 FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/13/2015 1:48:59 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

GEOFFREY WILLIAM WATTIKER, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-940-B

§

ELSENBARY ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL., §

§

Defendants. §

JUDGMENT

This action came on for consideration by the Court, and the issues having been duly

considered and a decision duly rendered, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the

Court ENTERS DEFAULT JUDGMENT as to Plaintiff Geoffrey William Wattiker’s Carmack

Amendment claim against Defendants Elsenbary Enterprises, Inc., Taghrid Ragab, and MedoHassan

and that Wattiker is AWARDED $17,500.00 for actual damages.

DATE: June 13th, 2023. 

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-1-

Case 3:22-cv-00940-B-BN Document 25 Filed 06/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 93