# Patent

## Title
Administering incident pools for incident analysis

## Abstract

Methods, apparatuses, and computer program products for administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system are provided. Embodiments include an incident analyzer receiving a plurality of incidents from an incident queue. The incident analyzer also assigns each received incident to an incident pool having a predetermined initial period of time. The predetermined initial period of time is the time within which the incident pool is open to the assignment of incidents. The incident analyzer calculates an arrival rate that incidents are assigned to the incident pool. The incident analyzer also extends based on the arrival rate, for each incident assigned to the incident pool, the predetermined initial period of time by a particular period of time.

## Background
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
This invention was made with Government support under Contract No. HR0011-07-9-0002 awarded by the Department of Defense. The Government has certain rights in this invention.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The field of the invention is data processing, or, more specifically, methods, apparatuses, and computer program products for administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system.
2. Description of Related Art
The development of the EDVAC computer system of 1948 is often cited as the beginning of the computer era. Since that time, computer systems have evolved into extremely complicated devices. Today's computers are much more sophisticated than early systems such as the EDVAC. Computer systems typically include a combination of hardware and software components, application programs, operating systems, processors, buses, memory, input/output devices, and so on. As advances in semiconductor processing and computer architecture push the performance of the computer higher and higher, more sophisticated computer software has evolved to take advantage of the higher performance of the hardware, resulting in computer systems today that are much more powerful than just a few years ago.
Modern distributed processing systems for intensive computing may have millions of devices with many processes running on each device all of which are capable of error and status reporting for automated error recovery, reporting to a systems administrator, and for other reasons. In many cases, in the case of an error for example, the sheer number of such error reports and status reports are so overwhelming that they cannot be handled in a meaningful manner. For example, a systems administrator receiving a hundred thousand error reports may be overwhelmed by the sheer number of such reports and therefore in the aggregate those reports become more and more unhelpful and irrelevant.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Methods, apparatuses, and computer program products for administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system are provided. Embodiments include an incident analyzer receiving a plurality of incidents from an incident queue. The incident analyzer also assigns each received incident to an incident pool having a predetermined initial period of time. The predetermined initial period of time is the time within which the incident pool is open to the assignment of incidents. The incident analyzer calculates an arrival rate that incidents are assigned to the incident pool. The incident analyzer also extends based on the arrival rate, for each incident assigned to the incident pool, the predetermined initial period of time by a particular period of time.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular descriptions of exemplary embodiments of the invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numbers generally represent like parts of exemplary embodiments of the invention.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary system for administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 2 sets forth a block diagram of automated computing machinery comprising an exemplary computer useful in administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 3 sets forth a block diagram of an exemplary system for administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 4 sets forth a diagram illustrating assigning events to an event pool according to embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 5 sets forth a diagram illustrating assigning alerts to an alert pool according to embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 6 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an example method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 7 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an additional method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 8 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an additional method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 9 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an additional method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 10 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an additional method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 11 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an additional method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 12 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an additional method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 13 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an additional method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS
Exemplary methods, apparatuses, and computer program products for administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the accompanying drawings, beginning with FIG. 1. FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary system for administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention. A distributed processing system is typically implemented as multiple autonomous or semi-autonomous computers that communicate through a computer network. In such example distributed processing systems, the computers often interact with each other in order to achieve a common goal. A computer program that runs in such an example distributed system is typically called a distributed program, and distributed programming is often used to describe the process of writing such programs.
In the example of FIG. 1, the distributed processing system (101) is implemented as a parallel computer (100), non-volatile memory for the computer in the form of data storage device (118), an output device for the computer in the form of a printer (120), and an input/output device for the computer in the form of a computer terminal (122). The parallel computer (100) in the example of FIG. 1 also includes a plurality of compute nodes (102). Each compute node is an automated computing device composed of one or more computer processors, its own computer memory, and its own input/output functionality. The compute nodes (102) are coupled for data communications by several independent data communications networks including a high speed Ethernet network (174), a Joint Test Action Group (‘JTAG’) network (104), a tree network (106) which is optimized for collective operations, and a torus network (108) which is optimized for point to point operations. The tree network (106) is a data communications network that includes data communications links connected to the compute nodes so as to organize the compute nodes as a tree. Each data communications network is implemented with data communications links among the compute nodes (102). The data communications links provide data communications for parallel operations among the compute nodes of the parallel computer.
In addition to compute nodes, computer (100) includes input/output (‘I/O’) nodes (110, 114) coupled to compute nodes (102) through one of the data communications networks (174). The I/O nodes (110, 114) provide I/O services between compute nodes (102) and I/O devices (118, 120, 122). I/O nodes (110, 114) are connected for data communications through local area network (‘LAN’) (130). Computer (100) also includes a service node (116) coupled to the compute nodes through one of the networks (104). The service node (116) provides service common to pluralities of compute nodes, loading programs into the compute nodes, starting program execution on the compute nodes, retrieving results of program operations on the computer nodes, and so on. The service node (116) runs an event and alert analysis module (124) and communicates with users (128) through a service application interface (126) that runs on the computer terminal (122).
Many of the components of the distributed processing system of FIG. 1, that is the devices of the distributed processing system or processes running on the devices of the distributed processing system of FIG. 1 are capable of some form of error or status reporting through events and many of such components are also capable of receiving alerts in response to one or more of such events. Often in distributed processing systems hundreds of thousands or millions of components may provide or receive incidents, often in the form of events or alerts.
An incident is a generic term used in this specification to mean an identification or notification of a particular occurrence on a component of a distributed processing system such as events described below, a refined identification of an occurrence often based on events such as an alert described below, or other notifications as will occur to those of skill in the art.
Incidents are administered in pools for event and alert analysis according to embodiments of the present invention. A pool of incidents is a collection of incidents organized by the time of either their occurrence, by the time they are logged in an incident queue, included in the pool, or other time as will occur to those of skill in the art. That is, incident pools are a collection of incidents organized by time. Such incident pools often provide the ability to analyze a group of time related incidents. Often such incident pools are useful in identifying fewer and more relevant incidents in dependence upon multiple related incidents.
An event according to embodiments of the present invention is a notification of a particular occurrence in or on a component of the distributed processing system. Such events are sent from the component upon which the occurrence occurred or another reporting component to an event and alert analysis module according to the present invention. Often events are notifications of errors occurring in a component of the data processing system. Events are often implemented as messages either sent through a data communications network or shared memory. Typical events for event and alert analysis according to embodiments of the present invention include attributes such as an occurred time, a logged time, an event type, an event ID, a reporting component, and a source component, and other attributes.
An alert according to embodiments of the present invention is refined identification of an occurrence—such and an error—based upon more than one event and therefore provides an identification of the occurrence in the context of its operation in the distributed processing system. Often an alert may be a notification of a particular error type of occurrence that is identified in dependence upon the plurality of events received from one or more components of the data processing system, such as, for example, a link failure among a plurality of devices each of which are producing many events based upon the single link failure, or a power failure provoking thousands of events, and so on.
Alerts are often implemented as messages to be sent through a data communications network or shared memory. Typical alerts according to embodiments of the present invention have attributes attached to them based upon the attributes of the events received from which they are identified.
The service node (116) of FIG. 1 has installed upon it an event and alert analysis module (124) that includes at least two incident analyzers implemented as event analyzers and alert analyzers capable of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention. The event and alert analysis module (124) is implemented as automated computing machinery configured to receive a plurality of incidents from an incident queue and assign each received incident to an incident pool having a predetermined initial period of time. A predetermined initial period of time of an incident pools is the time period within which the incident pool is open to the assignment of incidents. The event and alert analysis module (124) is also configured to calculate an arrival rate that incidents are assigned to the incident pool. The event and alert analysis module (124) is also implemented as automated computing machinery configured to extend based on the arrival rate, for each incident assigned to the incident pool, the predetermined initial period of time by a particular period of time.
By extending based on arrival rate, the duration that an incident pool is open to the assignment of incidents, the incident pool may extend the predetermined initial period of time with smaller or larger extensions that are optimally selected to correspond with the arrival rate at which incidents are assigned to the incident pool.
The arrangement of nodes, networks, and I/O devices making up the exemplary distributed processing system illustrated in FIG. 1 are for explanation only, not for limitation of the present invention. Distributed data processing systems configured to administer incident pools for incident analysis according to embodiments of the present invention may include additional nodes, networks, devices, and architectures, not shown in FIG. 1, as will occur to those of skill in the art. The parallel computer (100) in the example of FIG. 1 includes sixteen compute nodes (102); parallel computers configured to administer incident pools according to embodiments of the present invention sometimes include thousands of compute nodes. In addition to Ethernet and JTAG, networks in such data processing systems may support many data communications protocols including for example TCP (Transmission Control Protocol), IP (Internet Protocol), and others as will occur to those of skill in the art. Various embodiments of the present invention may be implemented on a variety of hardware platforms in addition to those illustrated in FIG. 1.
Administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system in accordance with the present invention is generally implemented with computers, that is, with automated computing machinery. In the system of FIG. 1, for example, all the service nodes, I/O nodes, compute nodes, of the parallel computer are implemented to some extent at least as computers. For further explanation, therefore, FIG. 2 sets forth a block diagram of automated computing machinery comprising an exemplary computer (152) useful in administering incident pools according to embodiments of the present invention. The computer (152) of FIG. 2 includes at least one computer processor (156) or ‘CPU’ as well as random access memory (168) (‘RAM’) which is connected through a high speed memory bus (166) and bus adapter (158) to processor (156) and to other components of the computer (152) and through an expansion bus to adapters for communications with other components of a distributed processing system (101).
Stored in RAM (168) is an event and alert analysis module (124), a module of automated computing machinery for administering incident pools according to embodiments of the present invention. The event and alert analysis module (124) includes two incident analyzers according to embodiments of the present invention.
The incident analyzers include an event analyzer (208) and an alert analyzer (218). The event analyzer of FIG. 2 is a module of automated computing machinery capable of identifying alerts in dependence upon received events. That is, event analyzers typically receive events and produce alerts. In many embodiments, a plurality of event analyzers are implemented in parallel. Often such event analyzers are assigned to a particular pool of events and may be focused on events from a particular component or caused by a particular occurrence to produce a more concise set of alerts.
The alert analyzer (218) of FIG. 2 is a module of automated computing machinery capable of identifying alerts for transmission from events and other alerts, identifying additional alerts for transmission, and suppressing unnecessary, irrelevant, or otherwise unwanted alerts identified by the event analyzer. That is, alert analyzers typically receive alerts and events and produce or forward alerts in dependence upon those alerts and events. In many embodiments, a plurality of alert analyzers are implemented in parallel. Often such alert analyzers are assigned to a particular pool of alerts and may be focused on alerts with particular attributes to produce a more concise set of alerts.
In addition to the general functions described above, the event analyzer (208) and the alert analyzer (218) may each be configured to administer incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention. An event analyzer administers pools of events according to embodiments of the present invention by receiving a plurality of incidents from an incident queue and assigning each received event to an event pool having a predetermined initial period of time and calculating an arrival rate that events are assigned to the event pool. An event analyzer configured to administer incident pools according to embodiments of the present invention is also configured to extend based on the arrival rate, for each alert assigned to the alert pool, the predetermined initial period of time by a particular period of time.
An alert analyzer administers pools of alerts according to embodiments of the present invention by receiving a plurality of incidents from an incident queue and assigning each received alert to an alert pool having a predetermined initial period of time and calculating an arrival rate that alerts are assigned to the alert pool. An alert analyzer configured to administer pools of alerts according to embodiments of the present invention is also configured to extend based on the arrival rate, for each alert assigned to the alert pool, the predetermined initial period of time by a particular period of time.
Also stored in RAM (168) is an operating system (154). Operating systems useful for relevant alert delivery according to embodiments of the present invention include UNIXTM LinuxTM Microsoft XPTM AIXTM IBM's i5/OSTM and others as will occur to those of skill in the art. The operating system (154), event and alert analysis module (124), the event analyzer (208), the alert analyzer (218) in the example of FIG. 2 are shown in RAM (168), but many components of such software typically are stored in non-volatile memory also, such as, for example, on a disk drive (170). The computer (152) of FIG. 2 includes disk drive adapter (172) coupled through expansion bus (160) and bus adapter (158) to processor (156) and other components of the computer (152). Disk drive adapter (172) connects non-volatile data storage to the computer (152) in the form of disk drive (170). Disk drive adapters useful in computers for administering incident pools according to embodiments of the present invention include Integrated Drive Electronics (‘IDE’) adapters, Small Computer System Interface (‘SCSI’) adapters, and others as will occur to those of skill in the art. Non-volatile computer memory also may be implemented for as an optical disk drive, electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (so-called ‘EEPROM’ or ‘Flash’ memory), RAM drives, and so on, as will occur to those of skill in the art.
The example computer (152) of FIG. 2 includes one or more input/output (‘I/O’) adapters (178). I/O adapters implement user-oriented input/output through, for example, software drivers and computer hardware for controlling output to display devices such as computer display screens, as well as user input from user input devices (181) such as keyboards and mice. The example computer (152) of FIG. 2 includes a video adapter (209), which is an example of an I/O adapter specially designed for graphic output to a display device (180) such as a display screen or computer monitor. The video adapter (209) is connected to processor (156) through a high speed video bus (164), bus adapter (158), and the front side bus (162), which is also a high speed bus.
The exemplary computer (152) of FIG. 2 includes a communications adapter (167) for data communications with other computers (182) and for data communications with a data communications network (100). Such data communications may be carried out serially through RS-232 connections, through external buses such as a Universal Serial Bus (‘USB’), through data communications data communications networks such as IP data communications networks, and in other ways as will occur to those of skill in the art. Communications adapters implement the hardware level of data communications through which one computer sends data communications to another computer, directly or through a data communications network. Examples of communications adapters useful for administering incident pools according to embodiments of the present invention include modems for wired dial-up communications, Ethernet (IEEE 802.3) adapters for wired data communications network communications, and 802.11 adapters for wireless data communications network communications.
For further explanation, FIG. 3 sets forth a block diagram of an exemplary system for administering incident pools for incident analysis and relevant alert delivery in a distributed processing system (102) according to embodiments of the present invention. The system of FIG. 3 includes an event and alert analysis module (124). The event and alert analysis module (124) of FIG. 3 receives in an event queue (206) a plurality of events (202) from one or more components of a distributed processing system (102). A component of a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention may be a device of the distributed processing system or a process running on a device of the distributed processing. Such components are often capable of some form of event transmission, often for error or status reporting.
An event according to embodiments of the present invention is a notification of a particular occurrence in or on a component of the distributed processing system. Such events are sent from the component upon which the occurrence occurred or another reporting component to an event and alert analysis module according to the present invention. Often events are notifications of errors occurring in a component of the data processing system. Events are often implemented as messages either sent through a data communications network or shared memory. Typical events for event and alert analysis according to embodiments of the present invention include attributes such as an occurred time, a logged time, an event type, an event ID, a reporting component, and a source component, and other attributes. An occurred time is the time at which the event occurred on the component. A logged time is the time the event was included in the event queue (206) and is typically inserted into the event by the monitor (204) in the example of FIG. 3. An event type is a generic type of event such as for example, power error, link failure error, errors related to not receiving messages or dropping packets and so on as will occur to those of skill in the art. An event ID is a unique identification of the event. A reporting component is an identification of the component that reported the event. A source component is an identification of the component upon which the event occurred. In many cases, but not all, the reporting component and source component are the same component of the distributed processing system.
In the example of FIG. 3, the event and alert analysis module (124) includes a monitor (204) that receives events from components of the distributed processing system and puts the received events (202) in the event queue (206). The monitor (204) of FIG. 3 may receive events from components of the distributed processing system on their motion, may periodically poll one or more of the components of the distributed processing system, or receive events from components in other ways as will occur to those of skill in the art.
The system of FIG. 3 includes an event analyzer (208). The event analyzer (208) of FIG. 3 is a module of automated computing machinery configured to identify alerts in dependence upon received events. That is, event analyzers typically receive events and produce alerts. In many embodiments, a plurality of event analyzers are implemented in parallel. Often event analyzers are assigned to a particular pool of events and may be focused on events from a particular component or caused by a particular occurrence to produce a more concise set of alerts.
The event analyzer (208) of FIG. 3 assigns each received event (202) to an event pool (212). An event pool (212) is a collection of events organized by the time of either their occurrence, by the time they are logged in the event queue, included in the event pool, or other time as will occur to those of skill in the art. That is, event pools are a collection of events organized by time. Such event pools often provide the ability to analyze a group of time related events to identify alerts in dependence upon them. Often such event pools are useful in identifying fewer and more relevant alerts in dependence upon multiple related events.
The event pool (212) is administered by the event analyzer (208) according to embodiments of the present invention. The event analyzer administers pools of events according to embodiments of the present invention by receiving a plurality of incidents from an incident queue and assigning each received event to an event pool having a predetermined initial period of time and calculating an arrival rate that events are assigned to the event pool. The event analyzer also extends based on the arrival rate, for each event assigned to the event pool, the predetermined initial period of time by a particular period of time. In this manner, the event pool is extended with each received event until a collection of events that may be usefully used to identify alerts is assigned to the event pool.
As mentioned above, in some embodiments of the present invention, more than one event analyzer may operate in parallel. As such, each event analyzer may maintain one or more event pools for administering incident pools according to embodiments of the present invention. Assigning by the event analyzer the events to an event pool may therefore include selecting only events from one or more particular components. In such embodiments, particular components may be selected for a particular event pool to provide events associated with a particular period of time from a particular set of one or more components.
Assigning by the event analyzer the events to an event pool may also be carried out by selecting only events of a particular event type. In such embodiments, particular events may be selected for a particular event pool to provide events associated with a particular period of time from a particular set of event types.
Event analyzer (208) in the example of FIG. 3 identifies in dependence upon the event analysis rules (210) and the events assigned to the event pool one or more alerts (214). Event analyses rules (210) are a collection of predetermined rules for meaningfully parsing received events to identify relevant alerts in dependence upon the events.
The event analysis rules (210) of FIG. 3 include event arrival rules (230), event pool operation rules (232), event suppression rules (234), and event pool closure rules (236). Event arrival rules (230) are configurable predetermined rules for identifying alerts in dependence upon events in real time as those events are assigned to the event pool. That is, event arrival rules (230) identify alerts in dependence upon events before closing the event pool. Such rules are typically predetermined to identify particular alerts in dependence upon attributes of those events. Event arrival rules may for example dictate identifying a particular predetermined alert for transmission to a systems administrator in dependence upon a particular event type or component type for the event or other attribute of that event. Such rules are flexible and may be tailored to a particular distributed computing system and its functions.
An alert according to embodiments of the present invention is refined identification of an occurrence—such and an error—based upon more than one event and therefore provides an identification of the occurrence in the context of its operation in the distributed processing system. Often an alert may be a notification of a particular error type of occurrence that is identified in dependence upon the plurality of events received from one or more components of the data processing system, such as, for example, a link failure among a plurality of devices each of which are producing many events based upon the single link failure, or a power failure provoking thousands of events, and so on.
Alerts are often implemented as messages to be sent through a data communications network or shared memory. Typical alerts according to embodiments of the present invention have attributes attached to them based upon the attributes of the events received from which they are identified.
Event pool operation rules (232) are configurable predetermined rules for controlling the operations of the event pool. Such rules includes rules identifying the initial predetermined period of time for each event pool, rules dictating the length of time extended to the pool upon the assignment of each new event to the pool, rules dictating the minimum time an event must be in a pool before that event is included in a collection of events when the pool is closed, rules dictating the amount to extend the initial predetermined period of time based on an arrival rate of events assigned to an event pool, rules governing the closing of an event pool, and others as will occur to those of skill in the art. Such rules are flexible and may be tailored to a particular distributed computing system and its functions.
Event suppression rules (234) are configurable predetermined rules for suppressing one or more events in a closed pool of events used in identifying alerts. That is, often events in the closed event pool may be duplicate events, redundant events, or otherwise unnecessary or unhelpful events in identifying alerts. Such suppression rules are typically predetermined to delete, drop, or otherwise ignore those suppressed events. Event suppression rules may for example dictate that more than a threshold number of events of a particular event type or component type are to be suppressed. Such rules are also flexible and may be tailored to a particular distributed computing system and its functions.
Event pool closure rules (236) are configurable predetermined rules for identifying alerts in dependence upon unsuppressed events in the closed event pool and alerts identified by the event arrival rules. That is, event pool closure rules identify new alerts in dependence upon one or more or even all of the unsuppressed events in the closed event pool. The event pool closure rules also identify alerts in dependence upon the alerts identified by the event arrival rules (230) or a combination of the alerts identified by the event arrival rules (230) and one or more of the unsuppressed events in the closed event pool.
Event analyzer (208) in the example of FIG. 3 sends all the alerts (214) identified by the event analyzer (208) to an alert analyzer (218). The alert analyzer of FIG. 3 is a module of automated computing machinery capable of identifying alerts for transmission from events and other alerts, identifying additional alerts for transmission, and suppressing unnecessary, irrelevant, or otherwise unwanted or unhelpful alerts identified by the event analyzer. That is, alert analyzers typically receive alerts and events and produce or forward alerts in dependence upon those alerts and events. In many embodiments, a plurality of alert analyzers are implemented in parallel. The alerts (216) in the example of FIG. 3 are sent from event analyzer (208) to an alert analyzer (218) through an alerts queue (216).
The alert analyzer (218) of FIG. 3 assigns each of the identified alerts (214) to an alert pool (224). An alert pool (224) is a collection of alerts organized by the time of one or more the events causing the alert to be identified, the time the alert is identified, or other time as will occur to those of skill in the art. That is, alert pools are a collection of alerts organized by time. Such alert pools often provide the ability to analyze a groups alerts identified and included in the alert pool according to some time. Often such alert pools are useful in identifying fewer and more relevant alerts in dependence upon multiple related events and multiple related alerts.
The alert analyzer administers pools of alerts according to embodiments of the present invention by to receiving a plurality of incidents from an incident queue and assigning each received alert to an alert pool having a predetermined initial period of time and calculating an arrival rate that alerts are assigned to the alert pool. The alert analyzer also extends based on the arrival rate, for each alert assigned to the alert pool, the predetermined initial period of time by a particular period of time. In this manner, the alert pool is extended with each received alert until a collection of alerts that may be usefully used to identify additional alerts is assigned to the alert pool.
The alert analyzer (218) of FIG. 3 determines in dependence upon alert analysis rules (222) and the alerts in the alert pool whether to suppress any alerts. Suppressing an alert is typically carried out by dropping the alert, deleting the alert or otherwise ignoring or not transmitting the suppressed alert to a component of the distributed processing system.
Alert analyses rules (222) are a collection of rules for suppressing one or more alerts to provide a more relevant set of alerts for transmission to a component of the distributed processing system, such as for example, for display to a systems administrator and to identify additional alerts for transmission to one or more components of the distributed processing system. Alert analysis rules for example may dictate that duplicate alerts are to be suppressed, alerts of a particular type for transmission to a particular component are to be suppressed, alerts of a particular type be transmitted to a particular component are to be suppressed and so on as will occur to those of skill in the art. Such alerts may be more meaningful to a component of the distributed processing system for automated error recovery or for a systems administrator who may otherwise be less informed by a number of raw unanalyzed alerts.
The alert analyzer (218) of FIG. 3 also has access to the events queue (206). The alert analyzer (218) of FIG. 3 in dependence upon the alert analysis rules may, in some embodiments select events from the events queue and determine whether to suppress any alerts in dependence upon the selected events. That is, alert analysis rules may also take into account events and their attributes for suppressing alerts and for identifying additional alerts for transmission to one or more components. Such events may be related to the alerts in the alert pool or independent from such alerts.
The alert analyzer (218) of FIG. 3 transmits the unsuppressed alerts to one or more components of the distributed processing system. The alert analyzer may transmit the unsuppressed alerts to one or more components of the distributed processing system by sending the alert as a message across a data communications network, through shared memory, or in other ways as will occur to those of skill in the art. In the example of FIG. 3, the unsuppressed alerts (220) are transmitted to a terminal (122) for display to a systems administrator (128).
The alert analyzer (218) of FIG. 3 is also configured to identify in dependence upon alert analysis rules (222), the alerts in the alert pool (224), and selected events (206) one or more additional alerts and transmitting the one or more components of the distributed processing system. The additional alerts may include one or more alerts not identified by the event analyzer. Such additional alerts may provide additional information to a component of the distributed processing system of a systems administrator.
As mentioned above, relevant alert delivery according to the present invention includes assigning events to an event pool and those pools are administered according to embodiments of the present invention. For further explanation, FIG. 4 sets forth a diagram illustrating assigning events to an event pool according to embodiments of the present invention. An event pool (212) is a collection of events organized by the time of either their occurrence, by the time they are logged in the event queue, included in the event pool, or other time as will occur to those of skill in the art. That is, event pools are a collection of events organized by time. Such event pools often provide the ability to analyze a group of time related events and to identify alerts in dependence upon them. Often such event pools are useful in identifying fewer and more relevant alerts in dependence upon multiple related events.
Event pools according to embodiments of the present invention are typically operated according to event pool operation rules which are themselves often included in event analysis rules. Such event pool operation rules are configurable predetermined rules for controlling the operations of the event pool. Such rules includes rules identifying the initial predetermined period of time for each event pool, rules dictating the length of time extended to the pool upon the assignment of each new event to the pool, rules dictating the minimum time an event must be in a pool before that event is included in a collection of events when the pool is closed, rules dictating the amount to extend the initial predetermined period of time based on an arrival rate of events assigned to an event pool, rules governing the closing of an event pool, and others as will occur to those of skill in the art. Such rules are flexible and may be tailored to a particular distributed computing system and its functions.
Events are often assigned to an event pool according to their logged time. That is, events are typically inserted into the event pool in the order that they are received in the event queue. In the example of FIG. 4, the timing of the event pool (212) is initiated when the first event ‘Event 0’ (400) is assigned to the event pool (212) at time t0. The event pool of FIG. 4 is initiated for a predetermined initial period of time from t1 to tf. That is, upon receiving the first event ‘Event 0’ (400) the event pool of FIG. 4 has a predetermined initial period of time beginning at t1 and ending at tf. The predetermined initial period of time may be configured in dependence upon a number of factors as will occur to those of skill in the art such as, the number of components in the distributed processing system, the frequency of receiving events, the types of events typically received and so on as will occur to those of skill in the art.
In the example FIG. 4, the initial period of time is extended for each new event assigned to the event pool during the predetermined initial period from t1 to tf by a particular period of time assigned to the event. In the example of FIG. 4 upon assigning ‘Event 1’ (402) to the event pool (212) the predetermined initial period of time t0-tf is extended by ‘Extension 1’ (406) having a time of e1 thereby creating a new time for closing the event pool (212) at tf+e1 if no other events are assigned to the pool before tf+e1. Similarly, in the example of FIG. 4 upon assigning ‘Event 2’ (404) to the event pool having a time of e2, the now extended period of time from t0-tf+e1 is extended again by extension 2 (406) thereby establishing a new time for closing the pool at time tf+e1+e2 if no other events are assigned to the pool before tf+e1+e2 or before some maximum time for the event pool has expired. In this manner, the event pool is extended with each received event until a collection of events that may be usefully used to identify alerts is assigned to the event pool. According to embodiments of the present invention, the predetermined initial period of time may be extended based on an arrival rate at which events are assigned to an event pool.
In typical embodiments of the present invention, event pools may have a maximum duration that can no longer be extended. In such cases, a requirement may exist that an event that has not resided in the event pool for a threshold period of time be moved to a next event pool. In some embodiments, the attributes of such an event that is moved to the next event pool are used for relevant alert delivery with the initial event pool and in other embodiments, the attributes of such an event are used for relevant alert delivery with the next event pool to which that event is moved.
In the example of FIG. 4, when conditions are met to close the pool an events analyzer determines for each event (400, 402, 404) in the pool (212) whether the event has been in the pool for its predetermined minimum time for inclusion in a pool. If the event has been in the pool for its predetermined minimum time, the event is included in the closed pool for event analysis for relevant alert delivery. If the event has not been in the pool for its predetermined minimum time, the event is evicted from the closed pool and included a next pool for event analysis for relevant alert delivery.
In many embodiments, a plurality of event pools may be used in parallel and one or more of such event pools are assigned to a particular events analyzer. In such embodiments, events analyzers may be directed to events in event pools having particular attributes.
As mentioned above, relevant alert delivery according to the present invention also includes assigning alerts to an alert pool. For further explanation, FIG. 5 sets forth a diagram illustrating assigning alerts to an alert pool according to embodiments of the present invention. The alert pool (224) of FIG. 5 operates in a manner similar to the event pool of FIG. 4. That is, the alert pool according to the example of FIG. 5 includes alerts and the timing of the alert pool begins with the first alert ‘Alert 0’ (500) at time t0 and is configured to have a predetermined initial period of time t0-tf. In the example of FIG. 5, the initial period of time is extended for each new alert assigned to the alert pool in the predetermined initial period from t1 to tf by a particular period of time assigned to the alert. In the example of FIG. 5, upon assigning ‘Alert 1’ (502) to the alert pool (224) the predetermined initial period of time t0-tf is extended by ‘Extension 1’ (506) having a time of e1 thereby creating a new time for closing the alert pool (224) at tf+e1 if no other alerts are assigned to the pool before tf+e1. Similarly, in the example of FIG. 4 upon assigning ‘Alert 2’ (504) to the alert pool having a time of e2, the now extended period of time from t0-tf+e1 is extended again by ‘Extension 2’ (406) thereby establishing a new time for closing the pool at time tf+e1+e2 if no other alerts are assigned to the pool before tf+e1+e2 or before some maximum time for the alert pool has expired. According to embodiments of the present invention, the predetermined initial period of time may be extended based on an arrival rate at which alerts are assigned to an alert pool.
In typical embodiments of the present invention, alert pools may have a maximum duration that can no longer be extended. In such cases, a requirement may exist that an alert that has not resided in the alert pool for a threshold period of time be moved to a next alert pool. In some embodiments, the attributes of such an alert that is moved to the next alert pool are used for relevant alert delivery according to embodiments of the present invention with the initial alert pool and in other embodiments, the attributes of such an alert are used for relevant alert delivery with the next alert pool to which that alert is moved.
In the example of FIG. 5, when conditions are met to close the pool an alerts analyzer determines for each alert (500, 502, 504) in the pool (224) whether the alert has been in the pool for its predetermined minimum time for inclusion in a pool. If the alert has been in the pool for its predetermined minimum time, the alert is included in the closed pool for alert analysis for relevant alert delivery according to embodiments of the present invention. If the alert has not been in the pool for its predetermined minimum time, the alert is evicted from the closed pool and included a next pool for alert analysis for relevant alert delivery according to embodiments of the present invention.
In many embodiments, a plurality of alert pools may be used in parallel and one or more of such alert pools are assigned to a particular alerts analyzer. In such embodiments, alerts analyzers may be directed to alerts in alert pools having particular attributes.
For further explanation, FIG. 6 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an example method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention. The method of FIG. 6 includes receiving (402) in an event queue a plurality of events (202) from one or more components of a distributed processing system. Attributes of events useful in administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention may include an occurred time, a logged time, an event type, an event ID, a reporting component, and a source component.
Receiving (402) in an event queue a plurality of events (202) from one or more components of a distributed processing system may be carried out by receiving an event initiated by one or more components of the data processing system and storing the event in the event queue according to the time in which the event occurred or according to the time the event was received. Receiving (402) in an event queue a plurality of events (202) from one or more components of a distributed processing system also may be carried out by polling a component for status and receiving in response an event and storing the event in the event queue according to the time in which the event occurred or according to the time the event was received.
The method of FIG. 6 also includes assigning (404) by an event analyzer each received event to an event pool (212). In some embodiments of the present invention, assigning (404) by an event analyzer each received event (202) to an event pool (212) may be carried out by assigning events to the event pool according to the logged time. Assigning (404) by an event analyzer each received event (202) to an event pool (212) may also be carried out in dependence upon attributes of the event. Such attributes may include an identification or type of the component upon which an occurrence occurred to create the event, the reporting component of the event, the event ID, the event type, and so on as will occur to those of skill in the art.
An event pool according to the method of FIG. 6 includes events occurring during a predetermined initial period of time and in the example of FIG. 6 assigning (404) by the event analyzer each received event to an event pool includes extending (426) for each event assigned to the event pool the predetermined initial period of time by a particular period of time assigned to the event.
The event analyzer includes event analysis rules (210) including, event arrival rules, event pool operation rules, event suppression rules, and event pool closure rules. Event arrival rules are configurable predetermined rules for identifying alerts in dependence upon events in real time as those events are assigned to the event pool. That is, event arrival rules identify alerts in dependence upon events before closing the event pool. Such rules are flexible and may be tailored to a particular distributed computing system and its functions.
An alert according to embodiments of the present invention is refined identification of an occurrence—such and an error—based upon more than one event and therefore provides an identification of the occurrence in the context of its operation in the distributed processing system. Often an alert may be a notification of a particular error type of occurrence that is identified in dependence upon the plurality of events received from one or more components of the data processing system, such as, for example, a link failure among a plurality of devices each of which are producing many events based upon the single link failure, or a power failure provoking thousands of events, and so on.
Alerts are often implemented as messages to be sent through a data communications network or shared memory. Typical alerts according to embodiments of the present invention have attributes attached to them based upon the attributes of the events received from which they are identified.
Event pool operation rules are configurable predetermined rules for controlling the operations of the event pool. Such rules includes rules identifying the initial predetermined period of time for each event pool, rules dictating the length of time extended to the pool upon the assignment of each new event to the pool, rules dictating the minimum time an event must be in a pool before that event is included in a collection of events when the pool is closed, rules governing the closing of an event pool, and others as will occur to those of skill in the art. Such rules are flexible and may be tailored to a particular distributed computing system and its functions.
Event suppression rules are configurable predetermined rules for suppressing one or more events in a closed pool of events used in identifying alerts. That is, often events in the closed event pool may be duplicate events, redundant events, or otherwise unnecessary or unhelpful events in identifying alerts. Such suppression rules are typically predetermined to delete, drop, or otherwise ignore those suppressed events. Event suppression rules may for example dictate that more than a threshold number of events of a particular event type or component type are to be suppressed. Such rules are also flexible and may be tailored to a particular distributed computing system and its functions.
Event pool closure rules are configurable predetermined rules for identifying alerts in dependence upon unsuppressed events in the closed event pool and alerts identified by the event arrival rules. That is, event pool closure rules identify new alerts in dependence upon one or more or even all of the unsuppressed events in the closed event pool. The event pool closure rules also identify alerts in dependence upon the alerts identified by the event arrival rules or a combination of the alerts identified by the event arrival rules and one or more of the unsuppressed events in the closed event pool.
The method of FIG. 6 also includes identifying (410) by the event analyzer in dependence upon the event arrival rules and the events assigned to the event pool one or more alerts (214). Identifying (410) by the event analyzer in dependence upon the event arrival rules and the events assigned to the event pool one or more alerts (214) may be carried out by identifying alerts in dependence upon one or more attributes of the events as that event is assigned to the event pool. Identifying (410) by the event analyzer in dependence upon the event arrival rules and the events assigned to the event pool one or more alerts (214) may be carried by comparing the attributes of the events to the event arrival rules and identifying as a result of the comparison one or more alerts. Such attributes may include the type of component from which the event was received, the type of component creating the event, the identification of the component creating the event, the time the event was created or received, an error reported in the event, and many others as will occur to those of skill in the art.
The method of FIG. 6 also includes closing (412), by the event analyzer in dependence upon the event pool operation rules, the event pool (212). Closing (412), by the event analyzer in dependence upon the event pool operation rules, the event pool (212) may be carried out by determining that conditions dictated by the event pool operation rules have been met to stop assigning new events to the event pool and identifying in dependence upon those event pool operation rules the particular events that are included in the closed pool of events.
Closing the event pool may be carried out by determining that the initial period of time for the event pool and any particular periods of time for events received in the event pool extended to the initial period of time have expired. In such cases, if no new events are received prior to the expiration of the initial period of time for the event pool and any particular periods of time for events received in the event pool extended to the initial period of time the pool is closed.
Closing the event pool may also be carried out by determining that a maximum duration for the event pool has expired. In such cases, regardless of the number of new events being received after a maximum duration for the event pool has expired the pool is closed. In such embodiments, a maximum duration for the event pool prevents the event pool from including more events than are useful for relevant alert delivery according to embodiments of the present invention.
The method of FIG. 6 also includes determining (414), by the events analyzer in dependence upon the event suppression rules, whether to suppress one or more events in the closed event pool (212). Determining (414), by the events analyzer in dependence upon the event suppression rules, whether to suppress one or more events in the closed event pool (212) may be carried out by determining in dependence upon the attributes of one or more events in the closed pool whether to delete, drop, or otherwise ignore one or more of the events in the closed pool.
The method of FIG. 6 includes identifying (416) by the event analyzer in dependence upon the event pool closure rules and any unsuppressed events assigned to the event pool, one or more additional alerts (417). Identifying (416) by the event analyzer in dependence upon the event pool closure rules and any unsuppressed events assigned to the event pool, one or more additional alerts (417) may be carried out by identifying alerts in dependence upon one or more attributes of the events as that event is assigned to the event pool. Identifying (416) by the event analyzer in dependence upon the event pool closure rules and any unsuppressed events assigned to the event pool, one or more additional alerts (417) may be carried out by selecting the unsuppressed events for the event pool, comparing the attributes of the unsuppressed events of the event pool to the pool closure rules, and identifying as a result of the comparison one or more additional alerts. Such attributes may include the type of component from which one or more of the unsuppressed events are received, the type of components creating the unsuppressed events, the identification of the component creating the unsuppressed events, the time the events were created or received, one or more errors reported by the events event, the number of events in the pool, and many others as will occur to those of skill in the art.
The method of FIG. 6 includes sending (418) by the event analyzer to an alert analyzer all the alerts identified by the event analyzer. Sending (418) by the event analyzer to an alert analyzer all the alerts (214) identified by the event analyzer may be carried out by sending a message containing the alerts from the event analyzer to the alert analyzer. Such a message may be sent from the event analyzer to the alert analyzer across a network, through shared memory, or in other ways as will occur to those of skill in the art.
The method of FIG. 6 includes assigning (420) by the alert analyzer the identified alerts to an alert pool (224). An alert pool according to the method of FIG. 6 has a predetermined initial period of time and in the example of FIG. 6 assigning (420) by the alert analyzer the identified alerts to an alert pool (224) includes extending for each alert assigned to the alert pool the predetermined initial period of time by a particular period of time assigned to the alert. Assigning (420) by the alert analyzer the identified alerts to an alert pool (224) also may be carried out in dependence upon attributes of the alerts. Such attributes may include an identification or type of the component upon which an occurrence occurred to create the event that was used to identify the alert, the alert ID, the alert type, and so on as will occur to those of skill in the art.
The method of FIG. 6 includes determining (422) by the alert analyzer in dependence upon alert analysis rules (222) and the alerts in the alert pool whether to suppress any alerts. Determining (422) by the alert analyzer in dependence upon alert analysis rules (222) and the alerts in the alert pool whether to suppress any alerts may be carried out in dependence upon one or more attributes of the alerts. Such attributes may include an identification or type of the component upon which an occurrence occurred to create the event that was used to identify the alert, the alert ID, the alert type, and so on as will occur to those of skill in the art. In such embodiments, determining (422) by the alert analyzer in dependence upon alert analysis rules (222) and the alerts in the alert pool whether to suppress any alerts may be carried out by comparing the attributes of the alerts in the alert pool to the alert analysis rules and identifying as a result of the comparison one or more alerts for suppression according to the event analysis rules.
The method of FIG. 6 includes transmitting (420) the unsuppressed alerts to one or more components of the distributed processing system. Transmitting (420) the unsuppressed alerts to one or more components of the distributed processing system may be carried out by sending a message containing the alert to one or more components of the distributed processing system. In many cases, an alert may be sent as a message to a systems administrator advising the systems administrator of one or more occurrences within the distributed processing system.
As mentioned above, alert analysis rules may select additional alerts or suppress alerts in dependence upon events. In such embodiments, determining whether to suppress any alerts includes selecting events and determining whether to suppress any alerts in dependence upon the selected events. The method of FIG. 6 therefore also includes identifying (426) by the alert analyzer in dependence upon alert analysis rules (222), the alerts in the alert pool (224), and any selected events one or more additional alerts and in the method of FIG. 6, transmitting (428) the unsuppressed alerts also includes transmitting (430) any additional alerts to one or more components of the distributed processing system.
As mentioned above, relevant alert delivery according to embodiments of the present invention includes the administration of one or more pools of incidents such as events, alerts or other incidents as will occur to those of skill in the art. For further explanation, FIG. 7 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
The method of FIG. 7 includes receiving (702) a plurality of incidents (750) from in an incident queue (754). As described above, an incident may be an event or an alert and an incident analyzer may be an event analyzer or an alert analyzer. In the example of FIG. 7, an incident queue may be an event queue or an alert queue. An event according to embodiments of the present invention is a notification of a particular occurrence in or on a component of the distributed processing system. Such events are sent from the component upon which the occurrence occurred or another reporting component to an event and alert analysis module according to the present invention. Often events are notifications of errors occurring in a component of the data processing system. Events are often implemented as messages either sent through a data communications network or shared memory. Typical events for event and alert analysis according to embodiments of the present invention include attributes such as an occurred time, a logged time, an event type, an event ID, a reporting component, and a source component, and other attributes.
An alert according to embodiments of the present invention is refined identification of an occurrence—such and an error—based upon more than one event and therefore provides an identification of the occurrence in the context of its operation in the distributed processing system. Often an alert may be a notification of a particular error type of occurrence that is identified in dependence upon the plurality of events received from one or more components of the data processing system, such as, for example, a link failure among a plurality of devices each of which are producing many events based upon the single link failure, or a power failure provoking thousands of events, and so on.
Receiving (702) a plurality of incidents (750) from an incident queue (754) may be carried out by receiving an event initiated by one or more components of the data processing system and storing the event in the event queue according to the time in which the event occurred or according to the time the event was received. Receiving (702) a plurality of incidents (750) from an incident queue (754) may also be carried out by receiving an alert initiated by an event analyzer and storing the alert in the alert queue according to the time the alert was received. Receiving (702) a plurality of incidents (750) from an incident queue (754) may also be carried out by polling a component for status and receiving in response an event and storing the event in the event queue according to the time in which the event occurred or according to the time the event was received.
The method of FIG. 7 includes assigning (704) each received incident to an incident pool (752). Upon creation, the incident pool (752) of FIG. 7 has a predetermined initial period of time (780) that the incident pool (752) remains open to receive incidents. Assigning (704) each received incident to an incident pool (752) may be carried out by assigning an event to an event pool. Assigning (704) each received incident to an incident pool (752) may also be carried out by assigning an alert to an alert pool. Assigning (704) each received incident to an incident pool (752) may also be carried out by creating a data structure for inclusion of events or alerts and establishing for that data structure an initial period of time to include within that data structure events, alerts or other incidents as will occur to those of skill in the art. Assigning (704) each received incident to an incident pool (752) may also be carried out by selecting events, alerts, or other incidents in dependence upon such attributes as the component creating an event, the event type, the alert type, the component reporting the event, the component that reported or created the event in whose dependence an alert was created, and so on as will occur to those of skill in the art.
The method of FIG. 7 includes calculating (706) an arrival rate (756) that incidents (750) are assigned to the incident pool (752). Calculating (706) an arrival rate (756) that incidents (750) are assigned to the incident pool (752) may be carried out by determining the number of incidents that are assigned to the incident pool within a particular period of time and dividing that determined number by the time period in which the number of incidents were assigned to the incident pool.
The method of FIG. 7 includes extending (708) based on the arrival rate (756), for each incident assigned to the incident pool (752), the predetermined initial period of time (780) by a particular period of time (758). Extending (708) based on arrival rate (756), for each incident assigned to the incident pool (752), the predetermined initial period of time (780) by a particular period of time (758) may be carried out by creating a new time for closing the incident pool if no other incidents are assigned to the incident pool. Extending an incident pool enables more incidents to be assigned to the incident pool until a collection of incidents that may be useful to identify additional incidents are assigned to the incident pool.
As mentioned above, relevant alert delivery according to embodiments of the present invention includes the administration of one or more pools of incidents such as events, alerts or other incidents as will occur to those of skill in the art. For further explanation, FIG. 8 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an additional method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
The method of FIG. 8 is similar to the method of FIG. 7 in that the method of FIG. 8 includes: receiving (702) a plurality of incidents (750) from in an incident queue (754); assigning (704) each received incident to an incident pool (752); calculating (706) an arrival rate (756) that incidents (750) are assigned to the incident pool (752); and extending (708) based on the arrival rate (756), for each incident assigned to the incident pool (752), the predetermined initial period of time (780) by a particular period of time (758).
In the method of FIG. 8, however, calculating (706) an arrival rate (756) that incidents (750) are assigned to the incident pool (752) includes calculating (802) a number (890) of incidents that are assigned to the incident pool (752) within a predefined time period (860). Each incident pool may have a particular predefined time period that is based on the attributes of the incidents assigned to the incident pool. Calculating (802) a number (890) of incidents that are assigned to the incident pool (752) within a predefined time period (860) may be carried out by increasing a value with each instance of an incident being assigned to the incident pool within the predefined time period.
In the method of FIG. 8, calculating (706) an arrival rate (756) that incidents (750) are assigned to the incident pool (752) also includes determining (804) whether the calculated number (890) of incidents exceeds a predetermined maximum threshold (852). Each incident pool may have a different predetermined maximum threshold, where the amount of the maximum threshold is dependent upon the attributes of the incident pool or the incidents assigned to the incident pool. Determining (804) whether the calculated number (890) of incidents exceeds a predetermined maximum threshold (852) may be carried out by comparing the calculated number of incidents to the maximum threshold.
If the calculated number (890) of incidents exceeds the predetermined maximum threshold (852), the method of FIG. 8 continues by using (806), as the arrival rate (756), a predetermined maximum arrival rate (850). Using (806), as the arrival rate (756), a predetermined maximum arrival rate (850) may be carried out by retrieving the predetermined maximum arrival rate and storing the maximum arrival rate as the arrival rate (756).
If the calculated number (890) of incidents does not exceed the predetermined maximum threshold (852), the method of FIG. 8 continues by calculating (808) the arrival rate (756) by dividing the calculated number (890) of incidents by the predefined time period (860). By extending the incident pool duration based on arrival rate, the pool may automatically adjust the incident pool duration to analyze incidents together rather than prematurely closing the incident pool and thus splitting the incidents across multiple incident pools.
As mentioned above, relevant alert delivery according to embodiments of the present invention includes the administration of one or more pools of incidents such as events, alerts or other incidents as will occur to those of skill in the art. For further explanation, FIG. 9 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an additional method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
The method of FIG. 9 is similar to the method of FIG. 7 in that the method of FIG. 9 includes: receiving (702) a plurality of incidents (750) from in an incident queue (754); and assigning (704) each received incident to an incident pool (752).
The method of FIG. 9 also includes calculating (902) a number (990) of incidents that are assigned to the incident pool (752) within a predefined time period (960). Each incident pool may have a particular predefined time period that is based on the attributes of the incidents assigned to the incident pool. Calculating (902) a number (990) of incidents that are assigned to the incident pool (752) within a predefined time period (960) may be carried out by increasing a value with each instance of an incident being assigned to the incident pool within the predefined time period.
The method of FIG. 9 also includes determining (904) that the calculated number (990) of incidents exceeds a predetermined minimum threshold (952). Determining (904) that the calculated number (990) of incidents exceeds a predetermined minimum threshold (952) may be carried out by comparing the calculated number of incidents to the minimum threshold.
In the method of FIG. 9, calculating (906) an arrival rate that incidents are assigned to the incident pool is in response to determining that the calculated number of incidents exceeds the predetermined minimum threshold. In addition, extending based on the arrival rate, for each incident assigned to the incident pool, the predetermined initial period of time by a particular period of time, in the method of FIG. 9, is in response to determining that the calculated number of incidents exceeds the predetermined minimum threshold. That is, in the method of FIG. 9, the arrival rate impacts the extension of incident pool duration only when a minimum number of incidents are assigned to the incident pool. For example, in particular embodiments, the method of FIG. 9 may be implemented when the number of incidents exceeds the predetermined minimum threshold and the method of FIG. 6 may be implemented when the number of incidents does not exceed the predetermined minimum threshold.
As mentioned above, relevant alert delivery according to embodiments of the present invention includes the administration of one or more pools of incidents such as events, alerts or other incidents as will occur to those of skill in the art. For further explanation, FIG. 10 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an additional method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
The method of FIG. 10 is similar to the method of FIG. 7 in that the method of FIG. 10 includes: receiving (702) a plurality of incidents (750) from in an incident queue (754); assigning (704) each received incident to an incident pool (752); calculating (706) an arrival rate (756) that incidents (750) are assigned to the incident pool (752); and extending (708) based on the arrival rate (756), for each incident assigned to the incident pool (752), the predetermined initial period of time (780) by a particular period of time (758).
The method of FIG. 10 also includes determining (1002) that the predetermined initial period of time (780) and any extensions of time associated with any incidents assigned to the incident pool (752) have elapsed before another incident is assigned to the incident pool (752). Determining (1002) that the predetermined initial period of time (780) and any extensions of time associated with any incidents assigned to the incident pool (752) have elapsed before another incident is assigned to the incident pool (752) may be carried out by using a timer to determine that the incident pool duration has expired.
The method of FIG. 10 also includes closing (1004) the incident pool (752) in response to determining that predetermined initial period of time (780) and any extensions of time associated with any incidents assigned to the incident pool (752) have elapsed before another incident is assigned to the incident pool (752). Closing (1004) the incident pool (752) in response to determining that predetermined initial period of time (780) and any extensions of time associated with any incidents assigned to the incident pool (752) have elapsed before another incident is assigned to the incident pool (752) may be carried out by determining that conditions dictated by the event pool operation rules have been met to stop assigning new events to the event pool and identifying in dependence upon those event pool operation rules the particular events that are included in the closed pool of events.
Closing the event pool may be carried out by determining that the initial period of time for the event pool and any particular periods of time for events received in the event pool extended to the initial period of time have expired. In such cases, if no new events are received prior to the expiration of the initial period of time for the event pool and any particular periods of time for events received in the event pool extended to the initial period of time the pool is closed.
As mentioned above, relevant alert delivery according to embodiments of the present invention includes the administration of one or more pools of incidents such as events, alerts or other incidents as will occur to those of skill in the art. For further explanation, FIG. 11 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an additional method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
The method of FIG. 11 is similar to the method of FIG. 7 in that the method of FIG. 11 includes: receiving (702) a plurality of incidents (750) from in an incident queue (754); assigning (704) each received incident to an incident pool (752); calculating (706) an arrival rate (756) that incidents (750) are assigned to the incident pool (752); and extending (708) based on the arrival rate (756), for each incident assigned to the incident pool (752), the predetermined initial period of time (780) by a particular period of time (758).
The method of FIG. 11 also includes determining (1102) that a maximum time (1150) for the incident pool (752) has elapsed. Determining (1102) that a maximum time (1150) for the incident pool (752) has elapsed may be carried out by comparing the maximum time to the total elapsed time of the incident pool.
The method of FIG. 11 also includes closing (1104) the incident pool (752) in response to determining that the maximum time for the incident pool (752) has elapsed. A pool may close based on a determining, by the incident analyzer, whether conditions have been met to close the pool (708) and may be carried out by determining whether a maximum time for the pool has elapsed. The maximum time established for the pool is typically dependent upon factors of the distributed processing system such as the size of the distributed processing system, the components of the distributed processing system, the computational requirements of the distributed processing system and others as will occur to those of skill in the art. Typically, the maximum time is established to be long enough to allow enough incidents to accumulate into the pool for meaningful event or alert analysis but short enough such that that analysis is not overwhelmed by the sheer number of incidents and to allow for alerts to be reported in a timely manner.
Closing (1104) the incident pool (752) in response to determining that the maximum time for the incident pool (752) has elapsed may be carried out by a timer going off after the close of the duration. An incident pool may also be closed by the arrival of an incident with a time that is past the incident pool close time. An explicit call to close the incident pool may also be invoked. For example, if a user of the incident pool encounters a failure of a control message.
As mentioned above, relevant alert delivery according to embodiments of the present invention includes the administration of one or more pools of incidents such as events, alerts or other incidents as will occur to those of skill in the art. For further explanation, FIG. 12 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an additional method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
The method of FIG. 12 is similar to the method of FIG. 7 in that the method of FIG. 12 includes: receiving (702) a plurality of incidents (750) from in an incident queue (754); assigning (704) each received incident to an incident pool (752); calculating (706) an arrival rate (756) that incidents (750) are assigned to the incident pool (752); and extending (708) based on the arrival rate (756), for each incident assigned to the incident pool (752), the predetermined initial period of time (780) by a particular period of time (758).
In the method of FIG. 12, however, calculating (706) an arrival rate (756) that incidents (750) are assigned to the incident pool (752) includes calculating (1202) a number (1290) of incidents that are assigned to the incident pool (752). Each incident pool may have a particular predefined time period that is based on the attributes of the incidents assigned to the incident pool. Calculating (1202) a number (1290) of incidents that are assigned to the incident pool (752) may be carried out by increasing a value with each instance of an incident being assigned to the incident pool.
In the method of FIG. 12, calculating (706) an arrival rate (756) that incidents (750) are assigned to the incident pool (752) also includes determining (1204) whether the calculated number (1290) of incidents exceeds a predetermined maximum threshold (1252). Each incident pool may have a different predetermined maximum threshold, where the amount of the maximum threshold is dependent upon the attributes of the incident pool or the incidents assigned to the incident pool. Determining (1204) whether the calculated number (1290) of incidents exceeds a predetermined maximum threshold (1252) may be carried out by comparing the calculated number of incidents to the maximum threshold.
If the calculated number (1290) of incidents exceeds the predetermined maximum threshold (1252), the method of FIG. 12 continues by using (1206), as the arrival rate (756), a predetermined maximum arrival rate (1250). Using (1206), as the arrival rate (756), a predetermined maximum arrival rate (1250) may be carried out by retrieving the predetermined maximum arrival rate and storing the maximum arrival rate as the arrival rate (756).
If the calculated number (1290) of incidents does not exceed the predetermined maximum threshold (1252), the method of FIG. 12 continues by calculating (1208) the arrival rate (756) based on durations between last incidents assigned to the incident pool (752). Calculating (1208) the arrival rate (756) based on durations between last incidents assigned to the incident pool (752) may be carried out by determining the duration between the last incidents added to the incident pool. By extending the incident pool duration based on arrival rate, the pool may automatically adjust the incident pool duration to analyze incidents together rather than prematurely closing the incident pool and thus splitting the incidents across multiple incident pools.
As mentioned above, relevant alert delivery according to embodiments of the present invention includes the administration of one or more pools of incidents such as events, alerts or other incidents as will occur to those of skill in the art. For further explanation, FIG. 13 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an additional method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system according to embodiments of the present invention.
The method of FIG. 13 is similar to the method of FIG. 7 in that the method of FIG. 12 includes: calculating (706) an arrival rate (756) that incidents (750) are assigned to the incident pool (752). The method of FIG. 13 is similar to the method of FIG. 12 in that the method of FIG. 13 includes: calculating (1208) the arrival rate (756) based on durations between last incidents assigned to the incident pool (752).
In the method of FIG. 13, however, calculating (1208) the arrival rate (756) based on durations between last incidents assigned to the incident pool (752) includes calculating (1302) for each incident assigned to the incident pool (752), a duration between assignments of the incident and another incident immediately previously assigned to the pool. Calculating (1302) a duration between assignments of the incident and another incident immediately previously assigned to the pool may be carried out by creating an assignment duration list that stores an entry for each incident assigned to an incident pool. The list may be initialized with zeroes and when a first incident is assigned to the incident pool, a first entry may be entered into the list. The first entry may identify the first incident and may also include a duration number of zero to represent this particular incident as being the first incident assigned to the incident pool. When a second incident is added to the incident pool, a second entry may be added to the list. The second entry may identify the second incident and may have a duration number representing the time between the assignment of the incident immediately previously assigned to the pool, which in this example is the first incident, and the assignment of the second incident. Entries may be continued to be added to the list until the incident pool is closed.
The method of FIG. 13 also includes calculating (1304) a last duration (1352) between the close of the incident pool (752) and the assignment of the last incident to the incident pool (752) before the close of the incident pool. Calculating (1304) a last duration (1352) between the close of the incident pool (752) and the assignment of the last incident to the incident pool (752) before the close of the incident pool may be carried out by creating a last entry in a list of durations between assignments of an incident pool. The last entry may indicate the duration between the time of the last assignment to the incident pool and the time of closing the incident pool.
The method of FIG. 13 also includes identifying (1306) a predetermined number (1354) of last incidents (1356) assigned to the incident pool (752). Identifying (1306) a predetermined number (1354) of last incidents (1356) assigned to the incident pool (752) may be carried out by examining an assignment duration list to determine the incidents having the most recent assignments to the incident pool. For example, if the predetermined number is five, then identifying the predetermined number of last incidents assigned to the incident pool would include identifying the last five incidents assigned to the incident pool before the close of the incident pool.
The method of FIG. 13 also includes calculating (1308) a sum total (1358) of the last duration (1352) and all of the durations associated with the identified last incidents (1356). Calculating (1308) a sum total (1358) of the last duration (1352) and all of the durations associated with the identified last incidents (1356) may be carried out by examining an assignment duration list to identify the duration associated with each identified last incident (1356) and adding all of the identified durations associated with the identified last incidents in addition to the last duration (1352).
The method of FIG. 13 also includes using (1310) as the arrival rate (756), the quotient (1360) of the predetermined number (1354) of the last incidents (1356) minus one and the sum total (1356). Using (1310) as the arrival rate (756), the quotient (1360) of the predetermined number (1354) of the last incidents (1356) minus one and the sum total (1356) may be carried out by subtracting one from the predetermined number (1354), and dividing that remainder by the number representing the sum total (1356). For example, if the predetermined number is five and the number representing the sum total is eight, then subtracting five by one, generates four which is then divided by eight to generate a quotient of one half. In the example method of FIG. 13, this quotient is used as the arrival rate (756), which is then used to extend the initial period of time within which the incident pool is open to the assignment of incidents. By extending the incident pool duration based on an arrival rate calculated based on durations between the last incidents added to the incident pool, an incident pool may be extended based on how quickly the last incidents were assigned to the incident pool before the close of the pool. For example, in the method of FIG. 13, if the last incidents were assigned in close succession with the close of the pool, the arrival rate will be higher than if there was a large delay between the assignments of the last incidents and the close of the incident pool.
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, aspects of the present invention may be embodied as a system, method or computer program product. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.” Furthermore, aspects of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.
Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may be utilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this document, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
Aspects of the present invention are described below with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
It will be understood from the foregoing description that modifications and changes may be made in various embodiments of the present invention without departing from its true spirit. The descriptions in this specification are for purposes of illustration only and are not to be construed in a limiting sense. The scope of the present invention is limited only by the language of the following claims.

## Claims

1. A method of administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system, the method comprising:
receiving, by an incident analyzer, a plurality of incidents from an incident queue;
assigning, by the incident analyzer, each received incident to an incident pool, the incident pool having a predetermined initial period of time within which the incident pool is open to assignment of incidents;
calculating, by the incident analyzer, an arrival rate that incidents are assigned to the incident pool, including:
calculating a number of incidents that are assigned to the incident pool within a predefined time period;
determining whether the calculated number of incidents exceeds a predetermined maximum threshold;
if the calculated number of incidents exceeds the predetermined maximum threshold, using, as the arrival rate, a predetermined maximum arrival rate; and
if the calculated number of incidents does not exceed the predetermined maximum threshold, calculating the arrival rate by dividing the calculated number of incidents by the predefined time period; and

extending based on the arrival rate, for each incident assigned to the incident pool, the predetermined initial period of time by a particular period of time.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein calculating the arrival rate that incidents are assigned to the incident pool includes:
calculating a number of incidents that are assigned to the incident pool;
determining whether the calculated number of incidents exceeds a predetermined maximum threshold;
if the calculated number of incidents exceeds the predetermined maximum threshold, using, as the arrival rate, a predetermined maximum arrival rate; and
if the calculated number of incidents does not exceed the predetermined maximum threshold, calculating the arrival rate based on durations between last incidents assigned to the incident pool.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein calculating the arrival rate based on durations between last incidents assigned to the incident pool includes:
calculating for each incident assigned to the incident pool, a duration between assignments of the incident and another incident immediately previously assigned to the pool;
calculating a last duration between a close of the incident pool and an assignment of a last incident to the incident pool before the close of the incident pool;
identifying a predetermined number of last incidents assigned to the incident pool;
calculating a sum total of the last duration and all of the durations associated with the identified last incidents; and
using as the arrival rate, a quotient of the predetermined number of the last incidents minus one and the sum total.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
calculating a number of incidents that are assigned to the incident pool; and
determining that the calculated number of incidents exceeds a predetermined minimum threshold,
wherein calculating an arrival rate that incidents are assigned to the incident pool is in response to determining that the calculated number of incidents exceeds the predetermined minimum threshold,
wherein extending based on the arrival rate, for each incident assigned to the incident pool, the predetermined initial period of time by a particular period of time is in response to determining that the calculated number of incidents exceeds the predetermined minimum threshold.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
determining that the predetermined initial period of time and any extensions of time associated with any incidents assigned to the incident pool have elapsed before another incident is assigned to the incident pool; and
closing the incident pool in response to determining that predetermined initial period of time and any extensions of time associated with any incidents assigned to the incident pool have elapsed before another incident is assigned to the incident pool.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
determining that a maximum time for the incident pool has elapsed; and
closing the incident pool in response to determining that the maximum time for the incident pool has elapsed.

7. An apparatus for administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system, the apparatus comprising a computer processor, a computer memory operatively coupled to the computer processor, the computer memory having disposed within it computer program instructions that when executed by the computer processor cause the apparatus to carry out the steps of:
receiving, by an incident analyzer, a plurality of incidents from an incident queue;
assigning, by the incident analyzer, each received incident to an incident pool, the incident pool having a predetermined initial period of time within which the incident pool is open to assignment of incidents;
calculating, by the incident analyzer, an arrival rate that incidents are assigned to the incident pool, including:
calculating a number of incidents that are assigned to the incident pool within a predefined time period;
determining whether the calculated number of incidents exceeds a predetermined maximum threshold;
if the calculated number of incidents exceeds the predetermined maximum threshold, using, as the arrival rate, a predetermined maximum arrival rate; and
if the calculated number of incidents does not exceed the predetermined maximum threshold, calculating the arrival rate by dividing the calculated number of incidents by the predefined time period; and

extending based on the arrival rate, for each incident assigned to the incident pool, the predetermined initial period of time by a particular period of time.

8. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein calculating the arrival rate that incidents are assigned to the incident pool includes:
calculating a number of incidents that are assigned to the incident pool;
determining whether the calculated number of incidents exceeds a predetermined maximum threshold;
if the calculated number of incidents exceeds the predetermined maximum threshold, using, as the arrival rate, a predetermined maximum arrival rate; and
if the calculated number of incidents does not exceed the predetermined maximum threshold, calculating the arrival rate based on durations between last incidents assigned to the incident pool.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein calculating the arrival rate based on durations between last incidents assigned to the incident pool includes:
calculating a last duration between a close of the incident pool and an assignment of a last incident to the incident pool before the close of the incident pool;
calculating a last duration between the close of the incident pool and the assignment of the last incident to the incident pool before the close of the incident pool;
identifying a predetermined number of last incidents assigned to the incident pool;
calculating a sum total of the last duration and all of the durations associated with the identified last incidents; and
using as the arrival rate, a quotient of the predetermined number of the last incidents minus one and the sum total.

10. The apparatus of claim 7 further comprising computer program instructions that when executed by the computer processor cause the apparatus to carry out the steps of:
calculating a number of incidents that are assigned to the incident pool; and
determining that the calculated number of incidents exceeds a predetermined minimum threshold,
wherein calculating an arrival rate that incidents are assigned to the incident pool is in response to determining that the calculated number of incidents exceeds the predetermined minimum threshold,
wherein extending based on the arrival rate, for each incident assigned to the incident pool, the predetermined initial period of time by a particular period of time is in response to determining that the calculated number of incidents exceeds the predetermined minimum threshold.

11. The apparatus of claim 7 further comprising computer program instructions that when executed by the computer processor cause the apparatus to carry out the steps of:
determining that the predetermined initial period of time and any extensions of time associated with any incidents assigned to the incident pool have elapsed before another incident is assigned to the incident pool; and
closing the incident pool in response to determining that predetermined initial period of time and any extensions of time associated with any incidents assigned to the incident pool have elapsed before another incident is assigned to the incident pool.

12. A computer program product for administering incident pools for incident analysis in a distributed processing system, the computer program product disposed upon a computer readable storage medium, the computer program product comprising computer program instructions that when executed by a computer cause the computer to carry out the steps of:
receiving, by an incident analyzer, a plurality of incidents from an incident queue;
assigning, by the incident analyzer, each received incident to an incident pool, the incident pool having a predetermined initial period of time within which the incident pool is open to assignment of incidents;
calculating, by the incident analyzer, an arrival rate that incidents are assigned to the incident pool, including:
calculating a number of incidents that are assigned to the incident pool within a predefined time period;
determining whether the calculated number of incidents exceeds a predetermined maximum threshold;
if the calculated number of incidents exceeds the predetermined maximum threshold, using, as the arrival rate, a predetermined maximum arrival rate; and
if the calculated number of incidents does not exceed the predetermined maximum threshold, calculating the arrival rate by dividing the calculated number of incidents by the predefined time period; and

extending based on the arrival rate, for each incident assigned to the incident pool, the predetermined initial period of time by a particular period of time.

13. The computer program product of claim 12 wherein calculating the arrival rate that incidents are assigned to the incident pool includes:
calculating a number of incidents that are assigned to the incident pool;
determining whether the calculated number of incidents exceeds a predetermined maximum threshold;
if the calculated number of incidents exceeds the predetermined maximum threshold, using, as the arrival rate, a predetermined maximum arrival rate; and
if the calculated number of incidents does not exceed the predetermined maximum threshold, calculating the arrival rate based on durations between last incidents assigned to the incident pool.

14. The computer program product of claim 13 wherein calculating the arrival rate based on durations between last incidents assigned to the incident pool includes:
calculating for each incident assigned to the incident pool, a duration between assignments of the incident and another incident immediately previously assigned to the pool;
calculating a last duration between a close of the incident pool and an assignment of a last incident to the incident pool before the close of the incident pool;
identifying a predetermined number of last incidents assigned to the incident pool;
calculating a sum total of the last duration and all of the durations associated with the identified last incidents; and
using as the arrival rate, a quotient of the predetermined number of the last incidents minus one and the sum total.

15. The computer program product of claim 12 further comprising computer program instructions that when executed by a computer cause the computer to carry out the steps of:
calculating a number of incidents that are assigned to the incident pool; and
determining that the calculated number of incidents exceeds a predetermined minimum threshold,
wherein calculating an arrival rate that incidents are assigned to the incident pool is in response to determining that the calculated number of incidents exceeds the predetermined minimum threshold,
wherein extending based on the arrival rate, for each incident assigned to the incident pool, the predetermined initial period of time by a particular period of time is in response to determining that the calculated number of incidents exceeds the predetermined minimum threshold.