alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street ‘

San Francisco, CA 94105 MAR 22 2011 Robert D. Fletcher Deputy Executive Officer California Air Resources Board P.O. Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 95812 Dear Mrir: On February 28 2011, the California Air Resources Board submitted revisions
to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We have reviewed materials submitted with the following rules and found that they fulfill the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix
V. APCD/AQMD
Rule # Rule Title Mendocino County

130 Definitions Mendocino County

221 Federal Permitting Requirements
for Greenhouse Mendocino County
494 Potential
to Emit Limitations North Coast Unified

110 New Source Review and Prevention
of Significant Deterioration Northern Sonoma County 130 Definitions Northern Sononia County 221 Federal Permitting for Greenhouse Gas Emissions This addresses all revisions
in this submittal.
In the coming months we will review the complete revisions for action pursuant
to Clean Air Act section 110(k). Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Cynthia G. Allen at (415) 947-4120.

C ey, Deborah Jordan Director, Air Divisioncc:Mr.ChristopherD.Brown,APCOMendocinOCountyAPCDMs.BarbaraLee,APCONorthernSonomaCountyAPCDMr.RickMartin,Jr.,APCONorthCoastUnifiedAQMDMr.MichaelGuzzetta,ManagerRuleEvaluationSectionStationarySourceDivision2
No. 72-804.

#### Ruckelshaus, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency *v.*Sierra Club et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted, 409 U. S. 1124.] Motion of the State of Michigan for additional time and for leave to present oral argument as *amicus curiae*denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White would grant the motion.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KENNETH MILLER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 357 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
**Exhibit 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIESOF CATALYTICA ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.**

| ** **                        | ** ** | ** **     | ** ** | **Percentage**   | ** ** |
|-----------------------------------|------------|----------------|------------|------------------|------------|
| **Name**                          | ** ** | ** **     | ** ** | **Jurisdiction** | ** ** | **of Ownership** | ** ** |
| GENXON Power  Systems, LLC        |       | Delaware       |       |             | 100        | % |   |
| Catalytica  NovoTec, Inc.    |       | Delaware       |       |             | 100        | % |   |
| CESI-SCR, Inc.               |       | Delaware       |       |             | 100        | % |   |
| CESI-Tech Technologies, Inc. |       | Delaware       |       |             | 100        | % |   |
| SCR-Tech, LLC                     |       | North Carolina |       |             | 100        | %(1) |   |
|                                   |            |                |            |                  |            |  |  |  |  |

----

(1)          100%owned by CESI-SCR, Inc.

----
#### BRANDON et ux. v. FROST.

No. 2755.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

March 31, 1953.

R. W. Williford, Fairfield, for appellants.

Bowlen Bond, Teague, for appellee.

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court of Freestone County, overruling a plea of privilege to be sued in Wichita County, appellants’ place of residence. Appellee Willie Frost was formerly married to Oletha Brandon, one of the appellants. They were divorced and custody of their two minor children was awarded to the parents of appellee, with right of visitation to home of appellant for 45 days in the summer. Parents of appellee live in Freestone County and were codefendants with appellant and appellant’s husband in the trial court. Appellee filed suit to secure full custody of his two children for himself, alleging that changed circumstances since the original decree awarding the children to his parents, with visitation for 45 days during the summer to his former wife, rendered such change in custody to the best interests of the children.

Appellants, the appellee’s ex-wife and her after-acquired husband, filed a plea of privilege to be sued in Wichita County, their place of residence.

After hearing, the trial court overruled appellants’ plea of privilege and appellants appeal.

The transcript and statement of facts from the trial court were filed in this court on July 1, 1947. The case was set on July 10, 1947 for submission and for oral argument on October 9, 1947. On October 9, 1947 the case was postponed indefinitely by agreement of counsel. Neither party has filed any brief in the case, and no request has been made by either for any action to be taken since October 9, 1947.

Since no effort has been made to prosecute this appeal for almost six years, there is no reason why this court should continue indefinitely to carry the case on its docket, and to report the same from time to time as a pending suit.

Therefore this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution, and the costs incident thereto are taxed against appellants.
EXHIBIT 12.1

OUTSOURCING SERVICES GROUP, INC.  FIXED CHARGE RATIO COMPUTATION

|                                                      |                              | Year Ended December 31, |      
|----------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------- | ----------------------- | -----
|
|
|Income (loss) before taxes and extraordinary items    |                              | $                       | 260  
|Fixed charges reflected in income (loss) before taxes |                              |                         |      
|                                                      | Interest expense             |                         |      
|                                                      | One-third of rental expenses |                         |      
|                                                      |                              |                         |      
|Total Fixed Charges                                   |                              | $                       | 2,543
|                                                      |                              |                         |      
|Income before taxes plus fixed charges above          |                              | $                       | 2,803
|                                                      |                              |                         |      
|Fixed charge ratio                                    |                              |                         | 1.10x
|                                                      | Fixed charge deficiency      |                         |      

---

QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT 

 

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Rodman & Renshaw  Capital Group, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-149768) of our report, with  respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Rodman & Renshaw  Capital Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and for the years ended December  31, 2007 and 2006, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form  10-K of Rodman & Renshaw Capital Group, Inc. for the year ended December31, 2008.

 

 /s/ Marcum & Kliegman LLP 

Marcum & Kliegman LLP  New York,  New York  March 10, 2009

----
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound

volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 17

- BS

- 283

IN RE: CONFIDENTIAL (D L R)

, Respondent. DDN: 205

- 16

Bar Registration No. 376379

BEFORE: Fisher and Easterly , Associate Judges; and Nebeker , Senior Judge.

O R D E R

(FILED

– July 13 , 2017)

Upon consideration of the petition of the Board on Professional

Responsibility’s (the “Board”) pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(c), to suspend

respondent indefinitely based on disability, and the Board’s motion to file under

seal

, and it appearing that neither respondent nor Disciplinary Counsel ha s

interposed any objection thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Board’s motion to file under sea l is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is indefinitely suspended from the

practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective immediately, and any pending

matters be held in abeyance pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI § 13(g). It is

FURTHER OR DERED that respondent’s attention is drawn to requirements

of D.C. Bar R. XI, §§ 14 and 16, relating to suspended attorney s . It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall file an affidavit in compliance

with D.C. Bar R. XI, §14(g) with the Court and the Bo ard and shall serve a copy of

the affidavit on Disciplinary Counsel.

PER CURIAM
Order entered May 21, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 12

- 00589

- CV

GREYHOUND LINES, INC . AND RASHAD ARMAND NICHOLS, Appellant s

V.

JANIE REEVES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas C ounty, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 09

- 09239



### O RDER

The Court has before it appellants’ May 10, 2013 unopposed second motion for extension

of time to file reply brief of appellants. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the

reply brief tendered by a ppellants on May 13, 2013 be timely filed as of that date.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS

JUSTICE
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AB Private Credit Investors Corporation (the Fund)
for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), J. Brent Humphries, as Chief Executive Officer of the Fund, and Wesley Raper, as Chief Financial Officer of
the Fund, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Fund.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                              
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: April 1, 2019 |  |  |  | /s/ J. Brent Humphries       
|                    |  |  |  | J. Brent Humphries           
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                    |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
|                    |  | 
|Date: April 1, 2019 |  |  |  | /s/ Wesley Raper             
|                    |  |  |  | Wesley Raper                 
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                    |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 133

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 27), 1993

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That a collection of statements made in trib3 ute to the late Justice Thurgood Marshall, together with

4 related materials, shall be printed as a House document,

5 with illustrations and suitable binding. The collection shall

6 be prepared under the direction of the Joint Committee

7 on Printing.

8 SEC. 2. In addition to the usual number, there shall

9 be printed the lesser of—
2

•HCON 133 RDS

1 (1) 50,000 copies (including 1,000 casebound

2 copies) of the document, of which 33,440 copies (in3 cluding 440 casebound copies) shall be for the use

4 of the House of Representatives, 7,600 copies (in5 cluding 100 casebound copies) shall be for the use

6 of the Senate, and 8,960 copies (including 460

7 casebound copies) shall be for the use of the Joint

8 Committee on Printing; or

9 (2) such number of copies of the document as

10 does not exceed a total production and printing cost

11 of $66,988, with distribution to be allocated in the

12 same proportion as described in paragraph (1), ex13 cept that in no case shall the number of casebound

14 copies be less than one per Member of Congress.

Passed the House of Representatives September 27,

1993.

Attest:

DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*William Rupoli, Defendant.

County Court, Kings County,

April 15, 1958.

*William Rupoli,*defendant in person.

*Edward S. Silver, District Attorney (William I. Siegel*of counsel), for plaintiff.

Hyman Barshay, J.

This is an application in the nature of a writ of error *coram nobis*to vacate and set aside a judgment dated February 6, 1951 (Goldstein, J.), convicting the defendant, after trial, of the crime of receiving stolen property, as a felony, and sentencing him as a third felony offender to a term of not less than 19 and not more than 20 years in State prison. The judgment of conviction was affirmed both by the Appellate Division (278 App. Div. 981), and by the Court of Appeals (303 N. Y., 595). He thereafter successfully moved to be sentenced as a second felony offender on the ground that one of his prior convictions resulted in a suspended sentence *(People*v. *Shaw,*1 N Y 2d 30), and he was resentenced, as such, to a term of 10 to 20 years.

His present application is based upon the ground that, during the trial, certain typewritten statements, containing prejudicial pencil notations, were received in evidence in their original form, in violation of an agreement with the District Attorney that these pencil notations be deleted, and on the further ground that, in his absence, the court informed the jury that, by stipulation of the District Attorney and defense counsel, the jury, *638if it wishes, may get all except certain specified exhibits. He contends this was done without getting his personal consent or approval.

The errors complained of are not available to the defendant by writ of error *coram nobis.*They occurred in the presence of the defendant’s counsel who voiced no objection to any of the proceedings. These errors and the failure to comply with section 425 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, apparent on the face of the record, could have been urged on appeal or he could have moved for a new trial. *(Matter of Hogan*v. *Court of Gen. Sessions,*296 N. Y. 1, 6; *People*v. *Sadness,*300 N. Y. 69, 74; *People*v. *Kendrick,*300 N. Y. 544.) He did neither. “ Such a procedural error may not now be asserted as a basis for *coram nobis.*The writ of error *coram nobis*may not be used as a vehicle for an additional appeal or a belated motion for a new trial which, although available to the defendant after verdict (Code Crim. Pro., § 465), was not made.” *(People*v. *Shapiro,*3 N Y 2d 203, 206.) The application is, therefore, denied. Submit order.

Let the District Attorney serve a copy of the order, when signed, together with notice of entry thereof, on the defendant at the institution where he is presently confined.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00086-L

§

ARNULFO BAESA, JR. §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent 

of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, 

and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the 

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the 

Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and 

ARNULFO BAESA, JR. is hereby adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C), namely, Possession With Intent 

to Distribute a Controlled Substance. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

☒ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court accepts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence that the 

defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released and should therefore 

be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions 

of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the defendant is likely to flee or pose a 

danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of whether it has 

been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be 

detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is 

not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This 

matter shall be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2022.

________________________________________

SAM A. LINDSAY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00086-L Document 30 Filed 12/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 48
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

 

I, Michael J. Mack, Jr., certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2015 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association (as indenture trustee).

 

 
| Date: January 27,   2016 | By:    | */s/ Michael J. Mack, Jr.*               |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   | Michael J.   Mack, Jr.                   |   |
|                          |   | President of John Deere   Capital Corporation |   |
|                          |   | (as Servicer)                                 |   |
|                               |        |                                               |        |  |

 

----
**Panel Member List for the Meeting of Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory Panel (FIFRA SAP)**  **to Consider and Review**  **Two**
**- dimensional Exposure Rainfall** 
**- Runoff Assessment (TERRA) Watershed**  **Model and its Use in the FIFRA Ecological Risk Assessment for Antimicrobial**  **Uses of Copper October 25** 

**– 26, 2011** 
**FI FRA SAP Chair**  **Kenneth M. Portier, Ph.D.** Program Director, Statistics American Cancer Society National Home Office Atlanta, GA **Designated Federal Official Fred Jenkins,**  **Ph.D.** U

. S

. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Science Coordination & Policy FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel EPA East Building, MC 7201M 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460 Tel: 202

- 564

- 3327, Fax: 202

- 564

- 8382, jenkins.fred@epa.gov
**FI FRA Scientific Advisory Panel Members**  **Janice Chambers, Ph.D., DABT, ATS** William L . Giles Distinguished Professor Director, Center for Environmental Health Sciences College of Veterinary

Medicine Mississippi State University Mississippi State, MS **Stephe n Klaine, Ph.D.**  Professor Department of Biological Sciences Director Clemson Institute of Environmental Toxicology Clemson University Clemson, SC**Martha Sandy, Ph.D.**

Senior Toxicologist and Chief Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency Oakland, CA **Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D.** Professor of Aquatic Ecotoxicology & Environmental Toxicology Department of Environmental Sciences University

of California, Riverside Riverside, CA **FQ PA Science Review Board Members**  **Linda Abbott, Ph.D.** Regulatory

Risk Anal ys t U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of Risk Assessment and Cost Benefit Analysis Washington, DC **Xuefeng Chu, Ph.D.** Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering North Dakota State University Fargo, ND **Richard H .**  **Coupe, Ph.D.** Associate Water Science Director U.S. Geological Survey Pearl, MS **Bernard A. Engel, Ph.D.** Head, Agricultural & Biological Engineering Purdue University West L afayette, IN **Robert J.M. Hudson, Ph.D.** Associate Professor Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences University

of Illinois Champaign, IL **Ian A. Kennedy, Ph.D.** Senior Evaluator/Pesticide Modeler Pest Management Regulatory Agency , Health Canada, Ottawa, Canada**Yuzhou Luo, Ph.D.**

Environment al Scientist Department of Pesticide Regulation California Environmental Protection Agency Sacramento, CA **Thomas L. Potter, Ph.D.** Research Chemist U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service Southeast Watershed Research Laboratory Tifton, GA