Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,
Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh,
Justices 

# Order

November 22, 2019

158749

158755

- 6

BRYAN PUNTURO, FAWN PUNTURO, and B & A HOLDINGS, LLC, d/b/a PARKSHORE RESORT, LLC, Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 158749 COA: 338727 Grand Traverse CC: 17

- 032008

- CZ BRACE KERN, Defendant

- Appellant, and

SABURI BOYER and DANIELLE KORT, f/k/a DANIELLE BOYER, Defendants. _________________________________________/

BRYAN PUNTURO, FAWN PUNTURO, and B & A HOLDINGS, LLC, d/b/a P ARKSHORE RESORT, LLC, Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 158755 COA: 338728 Grand Traverse CC: 17

- 032008

- CZ BRACE KERN and SABURI BOYER, Defendants, and

DANIELLE KORT, f/k/a DANIELLE BOYER, Defendant

- Appellant. _________________________________________/

BRYAN PUNTURO, FAWN PUNTURO, and B & A HOLDINGS, LLC, d/b/a PARKSHORE RESORT, LLC, Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 158756 COA: 338732 Grand Traverse CC: 17

- 032008

- CZ BRACE KERN and DANIELLE KORT, f/k/a DANIELLE BOYER, Defendants, andI, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 22, 2019

t1119 2

Clerk SABURI BOYER,

Defendant

- Appellant.
_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the October 16, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the applications. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellants shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether, as a threshold matter, the fair reporting privilege, MCL 600.2911(3)

— which can only be invoked “in a libel action”

— applies in a case in

whi ch the appell ants are not the media companies that published the allegedly defamatory statements, but are instead the persons who furnished the oral statements to the media; (2) whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the appellants’ allegedly d efamatory statements to the media regarding the pending litigation were not protected under the fair reporting privilege; (3) whether Bedford v Witte , 318 Mich App 60 (2016), was wrongly decided; and (4) whether the standards for application of the statuto ry fair reporting privilege are different for statements made by an attorney or by a layperson

- litigant. In addition to the brief, the appellants shall electronically file appendices conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record mu st provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellees shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellants’ briefs. The appellees shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative , stipulate to the use of the appendices filed by the appellants. Replies, if any, must be filed by the appellants within 14 days of being served with the appellees’ brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The time allowed for oral argument shall be 30 minutes: 15 minutes for appellants, to be divided at their discretion, and 15 minutes for appellees. MCR 7.314(B)(1).

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this

case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae. Motions for permission to file briefs amicus curiae and briefs amicus curiae regarding these cases

should be filed in Punturo v Kern , Docket No. 158749, only and served on the parties in

both ca ses

.