alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Advisory Panel for Biological Infrastructure (#1215).                    

*Date and Time:*                         November 30-December 1, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation at 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Gerald Selzer, Program Director Biological Instrumentation and Instrument Development, National Science Foundation, Rm. 615, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone (703) 292-8470.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate proposal for acquisition of Biological Instrumentation and Instrument Development for the Instrument Development for Biological Research (IDBR) Program as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: November 6, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-28786  Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF VICURON PHARMACEUTICALS INC.



Following is a list of Vicurons subsidiaries, each of which is organized under the laws of the Republic of Italy.
Biosearch Manufacturing S.r.l. was previously a subsidiary of Biosearch. On June 30, 2003, all of the former assets (other than cash) and liabilities of Biosearch, including Biosearch Manufacturing S.r.l., were contributed to Vicuron Pharmaceuticals
Italy S.r.l.



|                                     |  |                          |  |                                                                 |  |                     |   |  |                    
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | - |  | -------------------
|Name                                 |  | Jurisdiction ofFormation |  | Type of Entity                                                  |  | Vicurons Ownership |   |  | Other BusinessNames
|Biosearch Manufacturing S.r.l.       |  | Republic of Italy        |  | società a responsibilità limitata (a limited liability company) |  | 100                 | % |  | none               
|                                     |  |                          |  |                                                                
|Vicuron Pharmaceuticals Italy S.r.l. |  | Republic of Italy        |  | società a responsibilità limitata (a limited liability company) |  | 100                 | % |  | none
EXHIBIT
      32.2








STATEMENT
      OF EDWARD W. WILHELM,


EXECUTIVE
      VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF BORDERS GROUP, INC.


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I,
      Edward
      W. Wilhelm, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 3, 2007,
      of Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
      that
      the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Borders
      Group, Inc.




















Date: December
      13, 2007







/s/EDWARD
      W. WILHELM


Edward
      W.
      Wilhelm


Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Borders
      Group, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Plaintiff

Defendant

v.

Civil Action No.

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS 

(This form also satisfies Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1)

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and LR 3.1(c), LR 3.2(e), LR 7.4, LR 81.1(a)(4)(D), and LR 81.2,

provides the following information:

For a nongovernmental corporate party, the name(s) of its parent corporation and any 

publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its stock (if none, state "None"): 

*Please separate names with a comma. Only text visible within box will print.

A complete list of all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, 

guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary corporations, or other legal entities that are 

financially interested in the outcome of the case: 

*Please separate names with a comma. Only text visible within box will print.

Mitchell Ryan

Grapevine-Colleyville ISD et al

04:21-cv-01075-P

Plaintiff Mitchell Ryan

N/A

Mitchell Ryan

Case 4:21-cv-01075-P Document 2 Filed 09/21/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID 13
Date:

Signature:

Print Name:

Telephone:

Address:

City, State, Zip:

Bar Number:

Fax:

E-Mail:

NOTE: To electronically file this document, you will find the event in our Case Management (CM/ECF) system, under Civil/Other 

Documents/Certificate of Interested Persons

09/21/2021

Tony K McDonald

24083477

1501 Leander Dr. Suite B-2

Leander, TX 78641

512-200-3608

815-550-1292

tony@tonymcdonald.com

Case 4:21-cv-01075-P Document 2 Filed 09/21/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID 14
#### MALONE v. STATE.

No. 25630.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 9, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, 'State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*809BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was found guilty of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated and the jury assessed the penalty at a fine of $50.00.

The proceedings appear regular in every respect. The record contains neither a statement of facts nor bill of exception. Nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Porello, Appellee. 

(No. 28433

Decided January 15, 1941.)

*Mr. Frank T. CulUtan,*prosecuting attorney, *Mr. Neil W. McGill*and *Mr. John P. Butler,*for appellant.

*Mr. William E. Minshall,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the rea*568son no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Turner, Matthias, Hart and Bettman, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7634 

CARLOS R. MAYBERRY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN DOE #1, Commissioner of Anne Arundel

County District Court; JOHN DOE #2, Second

Commissioner of Anne Arundel County District

Court, individually in their official

capacity; JOHN SWIVEL, Case Manager,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA04-2998)

Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 4, 2005

Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos R. Mayberry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Carlos R. Mayberry appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Mayberry v. John Doe #1, No. CA-04-2998

(D. Md. filed Sept. 29, 2004 & entered Sept. 30, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Flutter Entertainment plc (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2023 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Edgecliffe-Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 
Date: March 26, 2024   /s/ Paul Edgecliffe-Johnson   Paul Edgecliffe-Johnson   Chief Financial Officer   *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)***
#### TUNSTILL et al. v. SCOTT.

No. 14127.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

Sept. 11, 1942.

*555H. S. Lattimore and John A. Scott, both of Fort Worth, for appellants.

Clark & Stegall and Clark, Craik, Burns & Weddell, all of Fort Worth, for appellee.

BROWN, Justice.

This cause having been transferred to us from the Texarkana Court of Civil Appeals, on an appeal affecting only the venue issue, we saw fit to certify same to our Supreme Court and said Court answered the questions certified in an exhaustive opinion. See 138 Tex. 425, 160 S.W.2d 65.

Upon the authority of that opinion we hold as follows: W. A. Tunstill, Eula Tunstill and G. G. Tunstill having filed both pleas of privilege to be sued in the District Court of Tarrant County, wherein they all reside, and a motion to transfer the cause as to them from the District Court of Gregg County to the District Court of Tar-rant County, and the judgment ordering the cause transferred to the District Court of Gregg County being, as to said three named defendants, a nullity and void, the judgment of the District Court of Gregg County overruling the several pleas of privilege and the said motion to transfer said cause to Tarrant County is reversed, and judgment is here rendered sustaining said pleas of privilege and said motion to transfer the cause as to the three named defendants, and the District Court of Gregg County is ordered and directed to make up a transcript in accordance with the provisions of Rule 89 (Civil procedure) and send same to the District Clerk of Tarrant County.

When this record was filed in the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth Supreme Judicial District at Texarkana, it appears that same was presented and was actually filed by the Clerk of said Court on the 62nd day after notice of appeal was given and after the order overruling the pleas of privilege and the motion to transfer said cause was made. Appellee made no objection to the filing of the transcript because it was not actually filed within 60 days but, while the cause was pending in such Court of Civil Appeals, appellee made a motion to strike the transcript because of errors and omissions.

It seems that the parties agreed upon the changes and additions that were required or demanded and after the transcript was so perfected the Court of Civil Appeals for said Sixth District overruled the motion to strike same.

We must and do assume that the said Court of Civil Appeals did its duty in making such order and that the transcript was properly filed in that Court before the cause was transferred to this Court.

G. A. Tunstill made no complaint as to the cause being transferred as to him to the District Court of Gregg County, and his rights are not before us for review.

The judgment as to the defendants W. A. Tunstill, Eula Tunstill and G. G. Tunstill is reversed and judgment is here rendered transferring the cause as to said three defendants to the 48th District Court of Tar-rant County.

McDONALD, C. J., not sitting.
<PAGE>

                            APPROVED FINANCIAL CORP

                    EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


100% OWNED SUBSIDIARIES OF APPROVED FINANCIAL CORP.
-----------------------------------------------------

Approved Residential Mortgage, Inc.
3420 Holland Road
Suite 107
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452
State of Incorporation:   Virginia.
Names used in business:   Approved Residential Mortgage Inc.
                          Approved Residential Mortgage Inc.
                          DBA Armada Residential Mortgage Inc.
                          Approved Residential Mortgage Inc
                          DBA Funding Center of Georgia

Approved Federal Savings Bank
2380 Court Plaza Drive
Suite 200
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23456
State of incorporation:   Federal Savings Bank Charter.
Names used in business:   Approved Federal Savings Bank


MOFC, Inc.
370 East Maple Road
Third Floor
Birmingham, MI 48009
State of incorporation:   Michigan
Names used in business:   ConsumerOne Financial


Approved Financial Solutions
3420 Holland Road
Suite 107
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452
State of Incorporation:   Virginia.
Names used in business:   Approved Financial Solutions, Inc.
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.



### IN THE MATTER OF: ROBERT ZIEGE Respondent. DocketNo. FAA-2009-0182 Judge J.E. Sullivan

FAA Case No. 2009S0700030 WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT



### The Complainant, by and through the undersigned attorney, pursuant to Section 13.215 ofthe Board's Rules of Practice [14 CFR 13.215] withdraws the Complaint in the above-referenced matter.

As a result, the Complainant respectfully requests that its Complaint be withdrawn and this matter closed. Respectfully submitted this

## ~ day ofFebruary, 2015.

# ~ Attorney Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

### _' u

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifythat a copy ofthe Withdrawal ofComplaint has been sent via facsimile and Federal Express to: The Honorable J.E. Sullivan DOT, ChiefAdministrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. East Building GroundFloor Room E12-320 Washington, D.C. 20590 (FAX) (202) 366-7536 and via Federal Express to: Robert Ziege 4140 Clemmons Rd., Suite 370 Clemmons, NC 27012 Atlanta, GA 30339-5948 andthe original and one copy viaFederal Express to: Hearing Docket U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 

# \OmvrtoJ**~11!0&1** DONNA STANLEY Legal Assistant Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

## FEB 2 6 2015 Dated
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JEFF LEACH, INDIVIDUALLY AND

D/B/A BASECAMP TERLINGUA

,

Appellant,

v.

KATY SCHWARTZ

,

Appelle e

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 000 73

- CV

Appeal from the

394 th District Court

of Brewster County, Texas

( TC # CVB 19 347 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ee ’ s third motion for extension of time within which to file

the brief until March 5 , 2021 . NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

THE APPELL ANT ’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ordered that the Hon. Jodi Cole

, th e Appell ee ’s attorney, prepare the Appell ee ’s

Brief and forward the same to this Court on or before March 5 , 2021

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9 th day of February, 2021

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-32598, 333-39054, 333-40182, 333-48170,
333-51518, 333-54808) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-97461) of Dynabazaar, Inc. of
our report dated February 19, 2004 relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

Rothstein Kass & Company, PC

Boston, Massachusetts
March 26, 2004
#### Ewell H. BAGWELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27205.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 24, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice,’ State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, three days in jail and a fine of $50.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Case 2:22-cv-00068-Z-BR Document 10 Filed 01/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 26
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14 PROMULGATED UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Peter Jackson, certify that:  1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Flutter
Entertainment plc;  2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;  b.
[Reserved];  c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and




---

5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: March 26, 2024



/s/ Peter JacksonPeter JacksonChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Annual Report of PDI, Inc. (the “Company”) on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nancy S. Lurker, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Date: March 22, 2011
/s/ Nancy S. LurkerChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14A2267. JERMARCUS DAVIS v. THE STATE

The appeal in this case was docketed on August 11, 2014. Appellants’ brief

and enumeration of errors were due on September 2, 2014. As of the date of this

Order, Appellant has not filed his brief and enumeration of errors, nor has he

requested an extension or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, this

appeal is hereby dismissed as abandoned. See Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a); Reese

v. State, 216 Ga. App. 773 (456 SE2d 271) (1995). 

To Jermarcus Davis: Your appeal has been DISMISSED because your brief

and enumeration of errors were not filed when due. If you have decided you do not

want to appeal, you need not do anything more. However, if you do still want to

appeal, you may have the right to an OUT-OF-TIME APPEAL – but you MUST

TAKE ACTION to exercise that right by moving for an out-of-time appeal in the trial

court. If your motion for an out-of-time appeal is denied, you may appeal that denial

to this court within thirty (30) days of the trial court’s decision. See: Rowland v.

State, 264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995).

December 18, 2014
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/18/2014