alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2016 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item
1123)





Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling
and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of March 1, 2015 by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation as Depositor,
KeyBank National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor relating
to the Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, COMM 2015-DC1 Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
(COMM 2015-DC1)





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto
Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:



| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of
January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
has been conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there
has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has
been specifically identified herein.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









|Certified by: | /s/ Adam Singer                |  | Date:  March 1, 2017
|------------- | ------------------------------ |  | --------------------
|              | Adam Singer, Managing Director |  |
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28451]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3291; Amendment #3]


State of Idaho

    In accordance with information received from the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, dated October 20, 2000, the above-numbered 
Declaration is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing 
applications for physical damage caused by this disaster from October 
31, 2000 to November 30, 2000.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for economic injury is June 1, 2001.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)


    Dated: October 25, 2000.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-28451 Filed 11-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Case 2:22-cv-00082-Z-BR Document 44 Filed 09/01/23 Page 1 of 4 PageID 229
Case 2:22-cv-00082-Z-BR Document 44 Filed 09/01/23 Page 2 of 4 PageID 230
Case 2:22-cv-00082-Z-BR Document 44 Filed 09/01/23 Page 3 of 4 PageID 231
Case 2:22-cv-00082-Z-BR Document 44 Filed 09/01/23 Page 4 of 4 PageID 232
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7344

DENNIS G. FOSTER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-552-7) Submitted: December 19, 2001 Decided: January 14, 2002 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis G. Foster, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Dennis G. Foster appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Foster v. Virginia Dep’t of Corr. , No. CA-00-552- 7 (W.D. Va. July 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Russell Lee TRUMBULL v. STATE.

No. 25320.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 9, 1951.

No attorney, for appellant.

George P.'Blackburn, State's ’Atty., of A.ustin, for tlie State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense’ is robbery; the punishment, fifteen -years in the penitentiary.

Accompanying the record is an affidavit in proper form executed by appellant requesting the dismissal of the appeal.

The request is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
#### Bobby SUMMEY, Appellant, v. J. Hodge THOMPSON, Judge of the Corporation Court of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, Appellee.

No. 12771.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Nov. 17, 1954.

Howard F. Sudduth, Corpus Christi, for appellant.

I. M. Singer, C. J. Taylor, Jr., Ellis M. Brown, Corpus Christi, for appellee.

POPE, Justice.

Appellant, Bobby Summey, has appealed from an order dismissing his suit for injunction against the Honorable J. Hodge Thompson, Judge of the Corporation Court of Corpus Christi. Summey was ordered to appear before Judge Thompson for the purpose of a hearing under the provisions of Section 22, Article 6687b, Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. That statute states the procedure whereby an operator’s license may be suspended or cancelled. The statute provides for an appeal and a trial de novo. Summey objected to the jurisdiction of the Corporation Court, and prior to any decision or finding by the Corporation Court he filed this suit in the District Court of Nueces County to enjoin the Judge of the Corporation Court from proceeding further. A restraining order was issued against the Judge of the 'Corporation Court, but after a hearing Summey’s petition for injunction was dismissed.

The order of dismissal is affirmed. District Courts do not exercise supervisory control over the proceedings of Corporation Courts. Seele v. State, 1 Tex.Civ.App. 495, 20 S.W. 946.

Affirmed.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 109

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress respecting the

80th anniversary of the Anti-Defamation League.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 109

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is celebrating

the 80th anniversary of its founding in 1913;

Whereas ADL has been a major leader in our Nation’s quest

for justice and fair treatment for all individuals alike by

fighting bias, bigotry, and racism and promoting understanding and respect;

Whereas in purpose and program, ADL espouses and fulfills

the highest ideals and aspirations of people of all faiths,

races, and backgrounds, by countering hatred and violence through the promotion of tolerance;
2

•HCON 109 EH

Whereas ADL’s activities are a constant reminder to the

world community never to forget the Holocaust and to incorporate its lessons into political systems and decisionmaking;

Whereas ADL has been a leading contributor to the cause of

democracy, respect for human rights and human dignity

of all peoples, and the security of Jewish communities

around the world and of the State of Israel;

Whereas ADL’s record of achievement sets an inspiring example of leadership and participation in the struggle for

justice;

Whereas ADL continues to grow in strength and scope while

maintaining its founding priority of educating the public

about anti-Semitism and other manifestations of prejudice; and

Whereas racism and other forms of intolerance still exist and

in too many instances lead to hate-inspired violence:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 Anti-Defamation League should be congratulated on its

4 80th anniversary and commended for effectively pursuing
3

•HCON 109 EH

1 the goal of promoting greater tolerance throughout the

2 world.

Passed the House of Representatives August 5,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTzuCT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Plaintiff.

NO. 5:22-CR-037-01-H

KYLE LAMARWEST,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIIE I,]NITED STATES MAGISTRATE JIJDGE

CONCERI\ING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Enry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(bX1), the undersigned District Judge is ofthe opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

DatedJune 30,2022.

JAMES SLEY HEND

UNITED TATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:22-cr-00037-H-BQ Document 29 Filed 06/30/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 60
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3547 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3547

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To extend the application of certain space launch liability provisions 
                             through 2014.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Space Launch Liability 
Indemnification Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. INDEMNIFICATION EXTENSION.

    Section 50915(f) of title 51, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``December 31, 2013'' and inserting ``December 31, 2014''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 2, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3547

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To extend the application of certain space launch liability provisions 
                             through 2014.
```
Case 2:22-cr-00044-Z-BR Document 56 Filed 08/16/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 150
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CARLOS CAMACHO,

#60477-177,

§

§ 

 Movant, §

§ No. 3:22-cv-00933-E (BT) 

v. § No. 3:20-cr-00339-E-1

§

UNITED STATES of AMERICA, §

 Respondent. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and 

the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated 

September 12, 2023, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the 

Court.1

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. Moreover, considering the record in this case, 

the Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. The Court adopts and incorporates by reference 

the Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation filed in this case in support 

of its finding that Movant has failed to show (1) that reasonable jurists would find this Court’s 

“assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” or (2) that reasonable jurists would 

find “it debatable whether the [motion] states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” 

1 No objections were filed.

Case 3:22-cv-00933-E-BT Document 8 Filed 09/29/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 42
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Page 2 of 2

and “debatable whether [this Court] was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

If Movant files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a 

motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

SO ORDERED this 29th day of September, 2023.

Case 3:22-cv-00933-E-BT Document 8 Filed 09/29/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 43
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**PC MALL,INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**(ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of PC Mall, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Brandon H. LaVerne, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely forpurposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)      theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2)      theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated.

 

This Certification hasnot been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.

 

August 4,2008

 
| /s/ Brandon H. LaVerne  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Brandon H. LaVerne      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
TDCJ Offender Details ty>(hVlO\ Page 1of2

wmmmm®m^MmM e TDCJ Home New Offender Search

Offender Information Details

Return to Search list

SID Number:

TDCJ Number:

Name:

Race:

Gender:

DOB:

Maximum Sentence Date:

Current Facility:

Projected Release Date:

Parole Eligibility Date:

Offender Visitation Eligible:

05947021

01981234

SCHULTZ.ROLAND HAYES

B

M

1982-03-11

2028-12-21

C MOORE

2020-11-23

2015-09-15

YES

Information provided is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times per day

on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family members and

friends are encouraged to call the unit prior to traveling for a visit.

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE:

Scheduled Release Date:

Scheduled Release Type:

Scheduled Release Location:

Offender is not scheduled for release at this time.

Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Parole Review Information

Offense History:

Offense ~„ Sentence ~ . Case Sentence (YYDate 0ffense Date County No. MM-DD)

2003-02-10 POSSCONTSUBS

COCAINE 2004-02-24 PALOPINTO 12,224 7-00-00

'

http://offender.tdcj.state.tx.us/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=05947021 5/26/2015
**MEMORANDUM**

**DATE:** 08/19 /2014 **FROM:** Laura Farris/EPA Region 8 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR – 2013
- 0602 **SUBJECT:** Center for the New Energy Economy Section Clean Power Plan Meeting
- August 18 ,

2014 **SUMMARY :**  EPA Region 8 staff met with representatives from the Center for the New Energy Economy on Monday, August 18, 2014, to discuss various aspects of the proposed rule under section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act . The r ule was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES: EPA**  **Region 8** Joan Card Carl Daly Laura Farris Callie Videtich via phone Darcy O’Connor **Center for the New Energy Economy** Former Colorado Governor Bill Ritter Patrick Cummins Jeff Lyng
EXHIBIT 4

Case 4:22-cv-00305-O Document 1-6 Filed 04/13/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 22
6NLS WR 0DLQ &RQWHQW /RJRXW 0\ $FFRXQW 6HDUFK 0HQX 1HZ &LYLO 6HDUFK 5HILQH 6HDUFK %DFN /RFDWLRQ  -3 1R  +HOS

5(*,67(5 2) $&7,216

&$6( 12 -36&

(5 1HDU 0H YV $HWQD +HDOWK DQG /LIH ,QVXUDQFH &RPSDQ\ 









&DVH 7\SH ()LOH 6PDOO &ODLPV

'DWH )LOHG 

/RFDWLRQ -3 1R 

3$57< ,1)250$7,21

/HDG $WWRUQH\V

'HIHQGDQW $HWQD +HDOWK DQG /LIH ,QVXUDQFH &RPSDQ\ -RQDWKDQ 0DUF +HUPDQ

5HWDLQHG

:

6(59( 5(*,67(5(' $*(17 &7

&25325$7,21

 %U\DQ 6W 6XLWH 

'DOODV 7; 

3ODLQWLII (5 1HDU 0H

 /XQD 5G 6XLWH 

'DOODV 7; 

(9(176 	 25'(56 2) 7+( &2857

27+(5 (9(176 $1' +($5,1*6

 2ULJLQDO 3HWLWLRQ )LOHG 2&$ 2SHQLQJ

 ()LOH 2ULJLQDO 3HWLWLRQ 'RFXPHQW

*XLGH DQG )LOH  3HWLWLRQ (),/(' 6(59( &7 &25325$7,21 0$,/ 72 3/7) 12

 0DLOHG

&71 $1' 3(71 72 3360%

 &,7$7,21

0$,/ 72 3/7)0%

$HWQD +HDOWK DQG /LIH ,QVXUDQFH &RPSDQ\ 6HUYHG 

5HWXUQHG 

 $IILGDYLW3URRI RI 6HUYLFH )LOHG

5(7851 2) 6(59,&((),/('0%

 $QVZHU 'XH 2Q

+*

 $QVZHU )LOHG

'HIHQGDQW
V $QVZHU WR 3ODLQWLII
V 3HWLWLRQ(),/('0%

3DUW\ $HWQD +HDOWK DQG /LIH ,QVXUDQFH &RPSDQ\

3DUW\ +HUPDQ -RQDWKDQ 0DUF

 1RWLFH RI 3UH7ULDO 0HGLDWLRQ +HDULQJ

6(7 )25  # $0 (0$,/(' 9,$ 287/22. ,19,7$7,21 72 $// 3$57,(60%

3DUW\ (5 1HDU 0H

3DUW\ +HUPDQ -RQDWKDQ 0DUF

 3UH7ULDO 0HGLDWLRQ  $0 -XGLFLDO 2IILFHU 6ZHDULQJLQ 5DOSK -5

),1$1&,$/ ,1)250$7,21

3ODLQWLII (5 1HDU 0H

7RWDO )LQDQFLDO $VVHVVPHQW 

7RWDO 3D\PHQWV DQG &UHGLWV 

%DODQFH 'XH DV RI  

 7UDQVDFWLRQ $VVHVVPHQW 

 ,QWHUQHW 3D\PHQW 5HFHLSW  -3 (5 1HDU 0H 

 6WDWH &UHGLW 

Case 4:22-cv-00305-O Document 1-6 Filed 04/13/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 23
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM KALAN GOLD
CORPORATION UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND
THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          10,115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,404,791
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,634,783
<PP&E>                                       2,586,901
<DEPRECIATION>                                 656,188
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,565,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          858,873
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           973
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,089,205
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,565,496
<SALES>                                      2,335,940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,335,940
<CGS>                                        2,290,098
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,681,759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               671,078
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (447,543)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (445,247)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,003
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**ESSEX PORTFOLIO, L.P.**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with thisannual report of Essex Portfolio, L.P. onForm 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”), I, KeithR. Guericke, Principal Executive Officer****of EssexProperty Trust, Inc., the general partner of the registrant Essex Portfolio,L.P., hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2)  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates andfor the periods indicated.

 

 
| Date: March 31,  2005 |    /s/  Keith R. Guericke |   |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Keith R. Guericke                        |
|                       | Chief Executive  Officer, Director and   |
|                       | Vice Chairman of  the Board, Essex       |
|                       | Property Trust,  Inc.                    |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7584

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KENNETH WARREN ALLISON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District

Judge. (CR-90-446-A, CA-97-649-AM)

Submitted: September 29, 1998 Decided: October 20, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Warren Allison, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard James Apperson,

III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Warren Allison seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Allison, Nos. CR-90-446-A;

CA-97-649-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 1997). To the extent that Allison

challenged the forfeiture of his personal property, however, we

note that the dismissal is without prejudice to his filing of a

motion for return of seized property pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.

41(e). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED