alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A01A0212.

#### THE STATE v. JONES.

(548 SE2d 29)

Ruffin, Judge.

On September 17, 1997, Charles Jones pled guilty to theft by taking, and the trial court sentenced him to serve ten years. In August 2000, Jones filed an extraordinary motion, seeking a reduction in sentence, and the trial court granted the motion, reducing Jones’ sentence to four years confinement and six years probation. The State appeals, arguing that the trial court lacked authority to modify Jones’ sentence. We agree and reverse.

It is well settled that a “trial court’s authority to vacate or modify a judgment ends with the expiration of the term of court in which the judgment was entered.”1 This is so because courts must “give stability to their decisions by maintaining the finality of judgments.”2 As this Court has recognized, “[c]ourts cannot at their pleasure reopen questions which have been concluded by solemn adjudication. There must be some point at which stare decisis applies, and that point, with respect to a judgment upon the merits, unexcepted to, is the conclusion of the term at which it is rendered.”3

Here, the trial court originally sentenced Jones in September 1997. Thus, the term of court expired long before Jones filed his motion to modify the sentence.4 Jones does not contend that his original sentence was void or that there is any other factor that would extend the trial court’s authority to modify his sentence beyond the term of court in which it was entered.5 It follows that the court erred in considering Johnson’s motion to modify his sentence.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Johnson, P. J., and Ellington, J., concur.*

*200Decided April 12, 2001.

*Daniel J. Craig, District Attorney,*for appellant.

*Richard T. Pacheco II,*for appellee.

1

*McBee v. State,*239 Ga. App. 314 (521 SE2d 209) (1999). See also *Latham v. State,*225 Ga. App. 147, 148-149 (483 SE2d 322) (1997); *State v. Eight,*175 Ga. App. 65, 66 (1) (332 SE2d 363) (1985).

2

*Latham,*supra at 148.

3

 (Punctuation omitted.) Id.

4

 See OCGA § 15-6-3 (5) (C).

5

 Compare *McBee,*supra.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 12.1

STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         Years Ended December 31,
                                                         2003          2002         2001          2000         1999
                                                     -----------   -----------  -----------   -----------  -----------
<S>                                                  <C>           <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>
Income (loss) before income taxes, minority
  interest and extraordinary item                    $    15,780   $       645  $    (1,037)  $   12,288   $     8,284

Fixed charges deducted from earnings                       9,999        11,271       11,812       13,361        15,293
                                                     -----------   -----------  -----------   ----------   -----------

Earnings available for payment of fixed charges      $    25,779   $    11,916  $    10,775   $   25,649   $    23,577
                                                     ===========   ===========  ===========   ==========   ===========

Fixed charges:

  Interest expense, net                              $     8,257   $     9,403  $    10,141   $   11,669   $    13,576

  Amortization of deferred financing fees                    938         1,029        1,029        1,039         1,151

Portion of rent deemed to be interest                        804           839          642          653           566
                                                     -----------   -----------  -----------   ----------   -----------

Total fixed charges                                  $     9,999   $    11,271  $    11,812   $   13,361   $    15,293
                                                     ===========   ===========  ===========   ==========   ===========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                           2.6           1.1          0.9          1.9           1.5
                                                     ===========   ===========  ===========   ==========   ===========
</TABLE>
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 7
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 7
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 7
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 7
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 7
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 7
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,632,643
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,067,914
<ALLOWANCES>                                   152,696
<INVENTORY>                                    689,572
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,367,011
<PP&E>                                         993,134
<DEPRECIATION>                                 568,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,053,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,650,954
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,012,395
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,629,733)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,053,911
<SALES>                                      3,487,647
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        2,647,161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,870,238
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,183
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               152,696
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (38,183)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (382,591)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (382,591)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (376,266)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 21, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 21, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0140. GARRIAN SLEDGE et al. v. MELANIE MIDDLETON.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 16EV005409
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel for Biological Infrastructure; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Panel for Biological Infrastructure (#1215).
    Date and Time: November 30-December 1, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation at 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Gerald Selzer, Program Director Biological 
Instrumentation and Instrument Development, National Science 
Foundation, Rm. 615, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone (703) 292-8470.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposal for acquisition of 
Biological Instrumentation and Instrument Development for the 
Instrument Development for Biological Research (IDBR) Program as 
part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.


    Dated: November 6, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-28786 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Fritz FUNDERBURGH v. STATE.

No. 25827.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 26, 1952.

No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, 2 years confinement in the penitentiary.

Accompanying the record is an affidavit in proper form executed by appellant requesting the dismissal of the appeal.

Appellant’s request is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Digital Applications, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Patrick Soon-Hock Lim, Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.
 
 
 
 /s/
Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
 
 Patrick
Soon-Hock Lim
 Chief
Executive Officer
 January
5, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              17
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,987
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                      2,190
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,577
<PP&E>                                             635
<DEPRECIATION>                                     300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,227
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,242)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,212
<SALES>                                         18,086
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,086
<CGS>                                           17,722
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,178
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)



</TABLE>
Case 3:22-cr-00132-M Document 13 Filed 05/03/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 26
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berthel Growth & Income Trust I (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
O. Brendengen, Chief Financial Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company Planning,
Inc., the Trust Advisor of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


August 10, 2005                             /s/  Ronald O. Brendengen
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                 Ronald O. Brendengen
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 Berthel Fisher & Company
                                                 Planning, Inc.
                                                 Trust Advisor
                                                 Berthel Growth & Income Trust I
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3167 

To amend the bases for ineligibility for designation of countries as beneficiary 

developing countries under title V of the Trade Act of 1974, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2013 

Mr. TERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the bases for ineligibility for designation of countries as beneficiary developing countries under title V 

of the Trade Act of 1974, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Playing Fair on Trade 

5 and Innovation Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3167 IH

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF BENEFICIARY DEVELOPING 

2 COUNTRIES UNDER THE GENERALIZED SYS3 TEM OF PREFERENCES PROGRAM. 

4 (a) COUNTRIES INELIGIBLE FOR DESIGNATION.— 

5 Section 502(b)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

6 2462(b)(2)) is amended— 

7 (1) by inserting after subparagraph (H) the fol8 lowing new subparagraphs: 

9 ‘‘(I) Such country fails to provide adequate 

10 and effective protection for intellectual property 

11 rights. 

12 ‘‘(J) Such country maintains local content 

13 requirements, other than requirements that 

14 apply only to the procurement by governmental 

15 agencies of products purchased for govern16 mental purposes and not with a view to com17 mercial resale or with a view to use in the pro18 duction of goods for commercial sale.’’; and 

19 (2) in the matter following subparagraph (J) 

20 (as added by paragraph (1) of this subsection)— 

21 (A) by striking ‘‘and (H)’’ and inserting 

22 ‘‘(H)’’; and 

23 (B) by striking ‘‘shall not’’ and inserting 

24 ‘‘, (I), and (J) shall not’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3167 IH

1 (b) FACTORS AFFECTING COUNTRY DESIGNATION.— 

2 Section 502(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

3 2462(c)) is amended— 

4 (1) by striking paragraph (5); and 

5 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (6) and (7) as 

6 paragraphs (5) and (6), respectively. 

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section takes effect on 

8 the date of the enactment of this Act and applies with 

9 respect to the designation of any country as a beneficiary 

10 developing country under title V of the Trade Act of 1974 

11 on or after such date of enactment. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### McCURLEY v. STATE.

No. 25506.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 21, *1951.*

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for disturbing the peace; the penalty assessed is a fine of $1.

The prosecution originated in the justice court. After an appeal to the county court, and, upon a trial de novo, judgment was entered assessing a fine of $1 against the appellant.

Under the terms of Article 53, Vernon’s C.C.P., this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal. See Corley v. State, 141 Tex.Cr.R. 478, 149 S.W.2d 99, and cases there cited.

The appeal is dismissed.
#### BLAYLOCK v. STATE.

No. 25204.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 28, 1951.

No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for the offense of procuring, with the punishment assessed at confinement in the county jail for three months and a fine of $200.

The record is brought forward without a statement of facts or bill of exception. The proceedings appear regular in every way. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
United States District Court

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

v. § CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:22-CR-00127-S

§

DESMOND MITCHELL WILLIAMS (1) § 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY 

DESMOND MITCHELL WILLIAMS (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 

(5th Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts 1 and 

2 of the Indictment, filed March 29, 2022. After cautioning and examining DESMOND MITCHELL WILLIAMS (1)

under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and 

voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements 

of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that DESMOND MITCHELL WILLIAMS 

(1) be adjudged guilty of Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §

841(a)(1), and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge:

☐ The Defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and

convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The Defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The Defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the

Government.

☐ The Defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless: (1)(a) the Court finds there is

a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown

under § 3145(c) why the Defendant should not be detained; and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence

that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

June 6, 2024.

 _____________________________________ 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

REBECCA RUTHERFORD

NOTICE 

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B). 

FILED

KAREN MITCHELL

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT 

COURT June 6, 2024

Case 3:22-cr-00127-S Document 39 Filed 06/06/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 91
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON AS 

TRUSTEE FOR CWABS, INC. ASSET

BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES

2005-4,

Plaintiff,

VS.

CHARLES RAY OSBORN and

BRIEANNE OSBORN,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:22-CV-0656-G-BH

)

)

)

)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge

and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the

Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions

of the court, except for the following: (1) on page 3, line 4, the word “against” should

be deleted; (2) on page 3, line 6, the citation “(Id. at 4)” should be deleted and

replaced with “(See doc. 1 at 4);” (3) on page 5, line 7, “57” should be deleted and

replaced with “56;” (4) on page 8, line 3, the comma after the word “acceleration”

Case 3:22-cv-00656-G-BH Document 33 Filed 02/14/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 204
should be inside the quotation marks, directly after the word “acceleration,” and in

brackets like “[,];” (5) on page 8, line 6, the comma after the word “parties” should be

inside the quotation marks, directly after the word “parties,” and in brackets like

“[,];” and (6) on page 8, line 16, “[sic]” should be added after “20218.” 

The motion to dismiss and brief in support, filed May 9, 2022 (docket entry

13), by the defendant Charles Ray Osborn is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

February 14, 2023.

___________________________________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge

- 2 -

Case 3:22-cv-00656-G-BH Document 33 Filed 02/14/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 205