alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2016 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item
1123)



Pooling and Servicing Agreement
(the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of April 1, 2015 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,
Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer,
TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. as Trust Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, as Tax
Administrator and as Custodian, and Wilmington Trust, National Association as Trustee relating to the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage
Trust 2015-NXS1, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-NXS1

(WFCM 2015-NXS1)





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto
Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:



| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of
January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
has been conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there
has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has
been specifically identified herein.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|Certified by: | /s/ Adam Singer                |  | Date:  March 1, 2017
|------------- | ------------------------------ |  | --------------------
|              | Adam Singer, Managing Director |  |
32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CFO





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the  Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund II, (the Company)  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,  Kimberly A. Springsteen, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/          KIMBERLY A. SPRINGSTEEN





Kimberly A. Springsteen   Principal Financial Officer  November 10, 2003
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 30527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12909]

[[Page 30527]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 9150]

Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Pleasure and Piety: The Art of Joachim Wtewael'' 
Exhibition

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 27, 2015, notice was published on pages 16492 and 
16493 of the Federal Register (volume 80, number 59) of determinations 
made by the Department of State pertaining to the exhibition ``Pleasure 
and Piety: The Art of Joachim Wtewael.'' The referenced notice is 
corrected here to include an additional object as part of the 
exhibition. Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the additional object 
to be included in the exhibition ``Pleasure and Piety: The Art of 
Joachim Wtewael,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within 
the United States, is of cultural significance. The additional object 
is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or 
custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
additional object at the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from 
on or about June 28, 2015, until on or about October 4, 2015, at the 
Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, Houston, Texas, from on or about November 
1, 2015, until on or about January 31, 2016, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
description of the additional exhibit object, contact the Office of 
Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs in the Office of the Legal Adviser, 
U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email: 
section2459@state.gov). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 19, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-12909 Filed 5-27-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2099

CRYSTAL WEAVER BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of the Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Kaymani Daniels West, Magistrate

Judge. (5:15-cv-00321-KDW)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Crystal Weaver Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Crystal Weaver Brown appeals the magistrate judge’s order 

upholding the Commissioner’s denial of Brown’s applications for 

disability benefits and supplemental security income.* We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown 

v. Colvin, No. 5:15-cv-00321-KDW (D.S.C. Aug. 22, 2016). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the 

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).
| (logo) Prudential | Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.

 Prudential Mortgage Capital Company

2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500 Dallas, TX 75201

Tel 877-937-4500 |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.

c/o Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

375 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor

J0127-023, New York, New York 10152-023

Attention:  AJ Sfarra

 

 

RE:        WFCM 2015-C27

Period:    March 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period")

 

 

Annual Compliance Statement

 

 

I, Timothy E. Steward, in my capacity as President and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the  "Company")  hereby  certify  with  regard  to  the  Company's  role as  Primary  Servicer  under  the  Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement")  dated as of March 1, 2015 pertaining to the above-referenced certificates, that:

 

(i) a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the period noted above, and of the performance  of the Company  under the  Agreement  during the reporting period has been made under my supervision, and

 

(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout the reporting period.

 

 

Effective as of 2/24/2016       

/s/ Timothy E. Steward

Timothy E. Steward

President and Managing Director 

Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.
EXHIBIT 99.2



BORDERS
GROUP, INC.

STATEMENT
OF GREGORY P. JOSEFOWICZ,CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
BORDERS GROUP, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory P. Josefowicz,
certify that the Form 10-Q, dated July 27, 2003, of Borders Group, Inc. fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information
contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Borders Group, Inc.

Date: September 8, 2003

/s/ GREGORY P. JOSEFOWICZ
-----------------------------------------------
Gregory P. Josefowicz
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Borders Group, Inc.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Borders Group,
Inc. and will be retained by Borders Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCKDTVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-O39-01-H

ANDREW DEWAYNE JARAMILLO,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF TIM IJMTED STATES MAGISTRATE JIJDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GI,JILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(bX1), the undersigrred District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence willbe imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

Dated September _b )n))

Ule4L

JAMES WESLEY HENDRIX

UNITEP STATES DISTRICT ruDGE

I

Case 5:22-cr-00039-H-BQ Document 29 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 58
#### HADDIX v. WALTERS et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 13, 1951.

Leebern Allen, E. E. Bach, Campton, for appellant.

J. Douglas Graham, Campton, W. T. Walter, Lee City, for appellees.

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

On this appeal E. B. Haddix is contending that the trial court erred in giving him only a one-third interest, rather than the whole, of the landed estate of his wife, because (1) the couple was married prior to 1894; and (2) he should have been adjudged a lien, against the lands of his wife because he paid a debt against the lands.

Neither of these questions was dealt-with in the judgment -from which the appeal is prosecuted. The first paragraph of the judgment follows: “This action coming on to be heard upon the defendants motion to submit and it appearing to the dourt that the pafetiffs wave not had a fair chance to reply to the last depositions taken by the defendant they are given additional time; but. it appearing that both • parties to this action *re*asking that two tracts of land be sold, and that the only questions involved is the question of distribution of the proceeds of the sale it is ordered that the following tracts of land be sold and the proceeds divided according to future orders of this court. * .* *”

The judgment recited further that the cause was retained on the docket for the purpose of ascertaining the claims against the property and the lawful owners of the residue. The land was sold and the record contains an order of distribution. No exceptions or objections to any of the proceedings are noted in the record.

Since the questions raised in the appellant’s brief do not address themselves to the judgment from which the appeal is being prosecuted, there is *nothing left*for us to do but affirm the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.
United States District Court 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DMSION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

V. § CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:22-CR-0195-S 

§ 

JUAN SALTO-V ALADEZ (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY 

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a 

Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning 

Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed 

within 14 days of service in accordance with 28 U.S. C. § 63 6(b )( 1 ), the undersigned District Judge 

is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea 

of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the 

plea of guilty, and JUAN SALTO-V ALADEZ (1) is hereby adjudged guilty of 8 U.S.C. § 

1326(a), Illegal Reentry After Removal from the United States. Sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. 

The Defendant is ordered to remain in custody. 

SO ORDERED. 

SIGNED September 14, 2022. d ~ N GREN SCHOLER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cr-00195-S Document 23 Filed 09/14/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 37
OCTOBER TERM, 1735.

#### John Howell’s Lessee *against*John Tilden and Isabella Blay.

EJECTMENT for two tracts of land called Williams-*ton*and *The*Ponds, lying in *Kent*County.

At the Assises held for *Kent*County in *May,*1735, the Court gave in charge to the Jury, that traditional evidence *85of what an ancestor of the plaintiff, who was seised of the ......, lands in question fifty years ago, at that time did say concerning the bounds of those lands, might be given in evidence to the Jury, and the weight of it left to the Jury.

*Dulany,*for plaintiff.

The Court also ruled, that the plaintiff should he admitted to prove to the Jury by a witness, what *John*Beck, a deceased person, did on affirmation declare, before commissioners duly appointed to examine witnesses according to the late act of Assembly, to perpetuate the memory of bounds of the land in question, though the registry of the said affirmation was produced in Court; the matter so declared by the witness not being repugnant to the matter in the registered affirmation.

The defendant excepted.

The Provincial Court, at this term, gave judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals.

Lib. E. J. No. 2. fol. 16.

At *March*Term, 1736, the appeal was struck off of the appeal docket.
#### JENKINS v. STATE.

No. 21645.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 11, 1941.

Williamson & Nordyke, of Stephenville, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

There are no bills of exception in the record, nor is there a statement of facts accompanying the same. Consequently, there is nothing presented to this court for review other than the sufficiency of the indictment.

The indictment, as it appears in the record, contains three counts, in each of which appellant is charged with the burglary of a house. In the first count it was charged that the house was occupied and controlled by B. F. Compton; in the second count, that it was occupied and controlled by J. H. Phelps; and in the third count, that it was occupied and controlled by Elizabeth Compton. Appellant addressed two exceptions to the indictment. The first is based upon the ground that it does not set forth in plain and intelligible language the offense attempted to be charged; and the second, that it does not appear from the face of the indictment that an offense against the laws of the State was committed by the defendant. No motion to quash the indictment on the ground of mis-joinder of offenses or duplicity was made. However, if such a motion had been made it would, in our opinion, have been of no avail. Although it was charged that the house was occupied and controlled by different persons, still it appears to have been the same house. The charging part of the indictment alleging that it was occupied and controlled by different persons was made so as to avoid any possible variance between the allegation and the proof of occupancy and control of the house. Hence, it would not have been subject to be quashed on the ground of duplicity or mis-joinder of offenses. See Branch’s Ann. Tex.P.C., p. 262, sec. 507; also Pisano v. *352State, 34 Tex.Cr.R. 63, 29 S.W. 42; Robinson v. State, 56 Tex.Cr.R. 62, 118 S.W. 1037.

In the case of Slay v. State, 117 Tex.Cr.R. 519, 33 S.W.2d 459, 460, this court, speaking through Judge Morrow, said: “It has been specifically declared that an indictment is not duplicitous which in several counts alleges different owners of stolen property,”

We note from the court’s instruction that he submitted the case to the jury on the second count alone and withdrew from their consideration the first and third counts. Consequently, no error is reflected by .the record.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court. ■
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-LC20 (the"Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesrequired to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 ofRegulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Anymaterial instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, WilmingtonTrust, National Association, as Trustee,Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC (f/k/a Trimont Real EstateAdvisors, Inc.), as Trust Advisor prior to April 1, 2022, Fintech TrustAdvisors LLC d.b.a. CRED iQ, as Trust Advisor on and after April 1, 2022,CoreLogic Solutions, LLC., as Servicing Function Participant, ComputershareTrust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for theCertificate Administrator, and Computershare Trust Company, NationalAssociation, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian.

 

 

 

Dated: March 10, 2023

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

Anthony Sfarra

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ELVIS WAYNE JONES, #00536937,

Petitioner,

v.

DIRECTOR, Texas Department of Criminal

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division,

Respondent.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-00724-E-BH

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court conducted an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, 

and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated 

July 25, 2022. (Doc. 21). Objections were filed. (Doc. 22). The Court reviewed de novo those

portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, 

and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error.

The Court has found no error in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 21). Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, 

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 21).

SO ORDERED.

14th day of February, 2023.

___________________________________

ADA BROWN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00724-E-BH Document 23 Filed 02/14/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 124
Order entered April 19, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00307-CV

JOHN GOIN, Appellant

V.

HOPE CRUMP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-03801-D

ORDER

The parties’ joint motion to cancel oral argument is GRANTED. There will be no oral 

argument and the case will be submitted on the briefs. 

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE