alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1

                             FRONTLINE CAPITAL GROUP
                      RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


     The  following  table  sets  forth  the  Company's  consolidated  ratios of
earnings to fixed charges for the period shown:

<TABLE>

<S>                               <C>                                  <C>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31    FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31           JULY 15, 1997
------------------------------    ------------------------------                 TO
           1999                               1998                       DECEMBER 31, 1997
------------------------------    ------------------------------       ---------------------
    ($58,637,000)(1)                   ($8,079,858)(1)                     ($257,887)(1)
</TABLE>

(1) Represents the excess of fixed charges over earnings.




     The ratios of earnings to fixed charges were computed by dividing  earnings
     by fixed  charges.  For this  purpose,  earnings  consist  of  income  from
     continuing  operations  before minority  interest and fixed charges.  Fixed
     charges consist of interest expense, rent expense, and the  amortization of
     organization costs.




                                     IV-38
* The defendants were not served with process in district court and are not

participating in this appeal. After examining the appellant’s brief and the record, we have

concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the

appellant’s brief and the record. See F ED R. A PP P. 34(a)(2). 

# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted June 23, 2009 *

Decided June 23, 2009

Before

RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

No. 09

‐ 1570

NESER EM NEHEH ALI,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellant,

v.

CHICAGO BANCORP, INC., et. al,

Defendants

‐ Appellees

. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

No. 08 C 6713

Matthew F. Kennelly,

Judge

.

O R D E R

Neser Em Neheh Ali sued Bancorp and other defendants for what appear to be

commercial and contractual claims. His complaint is incoherent and contains no

discernable claims, though Ali labels himself and the defendants as “vessels” in an attempt NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 09

‐ 1570 Page 2

to invoke the admiralty jurisdiction of federal court. The district court dismissed the case

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Ali’s appellate brief is similarly incomprehensible. A litigant in this court must

“supply an argument consisting of more than a generalized assertion of error, with citations

to supporting authority.” F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 28(a)(9)(A); see Haxhiu v. Mukasey

, 519 F.3d 685, 691

(7th Cir. 2008). And although we construe pro se filings liberally, even litigants proceeding

without the benefit of counsel must articulate some reason for disturbing the district court’s

judgment. See Anderson v. Hardman

, 241 F.3d 544, 545 (7th Cir. 2001). Ali does not challenge

the district court’s reasoning. In fact, it is impossible to discern any argument at all.

DISMISSED.
| Name                                        | Jurisdiction        |
|---------------------------------------------|---------------------|
| iPass      U.K., Limited                    | United      Kingdom |
| iPass      Asia, Pte., Ltd.                 | Singapore           |
| iPass      Holdings, Pty, Ltd.              | Australia           |
| iPass      France, SAS                      | France              |
| iPass      Japan, K.K.                      | Japan               |
| iPass,      Ltd.                            | Israel              |
| iPass      Deutschland GmbH                 | Germany             |
| Safe3w,      Inc.                           | Delaware            |
| Mobile      Automation, Inc.                | Delaware            |
| GoRemote      Internet Communications, Inc. | Delaware            |
#### The State, ex rel. Sawyer, *v.*Neffner, Secy. of State.

(No. 28357

Decided September 20, 1940.)

*310
      *Mr. Robert N. Gorman, Mr. Simeon M. Johnson*and *Mr. John F. Ward*for relator.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, *Mr. E. G. Schuessler*and *Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt,*for respondent.

By the Court.

By the amendment to Section 4785-99, General Code, separation of the state and national party column ballots is required. It contains no provision whatever relating to the form of the ballots as separated. The act amending Section 4785-99, General Code, did not directly or by implication repeal the express provision of Section 4785-105, General Code, which requires a circle at the head of party column ballots’.

The presidential ballot is a party column ballot and therefore comes within the provisions of Section 4785-105, General Code.

The demurrer to the petition is overruled and, respondent not desiring to plead further, a writ of mandamus is allowed. TM ., ,

77 , *Writ allowed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7694 MARLON BRAMWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (CA-05-460-7; CA-03-2065) Submitted: January 19, 2006 Decided: January 26, 2006 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marlon Bramwell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Marlon Bramwell appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), which the district court construed as a complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeBramwell v. Fed. Prison Indus. , Nos. CA-05-460-7; CA-03-2065 (W.D. Va. July 19 & Sept. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                       EXHIBIT 4.1
[LOGO]
NUMBER
SHARES
TTM
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
CUSIP 87305R 10 9
SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
THIS CERTIFIES THAT
is the record holder of
FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE
PER SHARE, OF
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in
person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender
of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until
countersigned by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.
WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of
its duly authorized officers.
Dated:
[Stacey M. Peterson]
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
[Seal]
[Kent Alder]
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
CHASEMELLON SHAREHOLDER SERVICES, L.L.C.
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE


<PAGE>


TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH STOCKHOLDER WHO SO
REQUESTS THE POWERS, DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE PARTICIPATING,
OPTIONAL OR OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS OF STOCK OR SERIES THEREOF AND
THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR
RIGHTS. SUCH REQUEST MUST BE MADE TO THE CORPORATION'S SECRETARY AT THE
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION.
Keep this Certificate in a safe place. If it is lost, stolen or destroyed,
the Corporation will require a bond of indemnity as a condition to the
issuance of a replacement certificate.
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:
TEN COM     -as tenants in common
TEN ENT     -as tenants by the entireties
JT TEN      -as joint tenants with right
of survivorship and not as
tenants in common
UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - Custodian
(Cust) (Minor)
under Uniform Gifts to Minors
Act
(State)
UNIF TRF MIN ACT- Custodian (until age    )
(Cust)
under Uniform Transfers
(Minor)
to Minors Act
(State)
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.
For Value Received,     hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE(S)
Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and
appoint       Attorney
to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises.
Dated
In presence of
NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as
written upon the face of the certificate in every particular, without
alteration or enlargement, or any change whatever.
Signature(s) Guaranteed
By
THE SIGNATURES MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS,
STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP
IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM)
PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Power & Equipment Corp. &
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark J. Wright, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




                                           /s/ Mark J. Wright
                                           -----------------------
                                           Name: Mark J. Wright
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           Date: June 14, 2005




     A signed original of the written statements required by Section 906 has
been provided to Western Power & Equipment Corp. & Subsidiary and will be
retained by Western Power & Equipment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1999 FORM 10-QSB OF CSB FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,029
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     17,090
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             216
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               216
<LOANS>                                         29,636
<ALLOWANCE>                                        225
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,504
<DEPOSITS>                                      38,572
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,400
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                215
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,307
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  50,504
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    571
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  273
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   844
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 390
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 406
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              438
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       14
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     73
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          84
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        84
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        183
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   222
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       11
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  225
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               225
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
(logo) DIXON HUGHES GOODMANLLP

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Managers ofC-III Capital Partners LLC, the 

Sole Member of C-III AssetManagement LLC:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’sReport on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria,that C-III Asset Management LLC (the “Company”) complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission’s Regulation AB for all transactions for which the Companyacted as servicer involving first lien commercial mortgage loans (the“Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(1) –1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix) and1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activitiesperformed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management isresponsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on the assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards established by the American Instituteof Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on atest basis, evidence supporting management’s assertion and performingsuch other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Webelieve that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 isfairly stated, in all material aspects.

 

 

/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP

 

Asheville, North Carolina

February 6, 2017
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                                   EASCO, INC.
                   CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                (NUMBERS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                THREE MONTHS ENDED   SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                ------------------  ------------------
                                                JUNE 30,  JUNE 30,  JUNE 30,  JUNE 30,
                                                  1999     1998      1999      1998
                                                -------   -------   -------   -------
                                                    (UNAUDITED)         (UNAUDITED)

<S>                                             <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>
Weighted average shares of Common Stock
     issued                                      12,586    12,476    12,533    12,463

Less:  Treasury Stock outstanding                 3,028     2,005     3,028     2,005
                                                -------   -------   -------   -------

Weighted average shares of Common Stock
     issued and outstanding                       9,558    10,471     9,505    10,458

Add:  Weighted average shares of Common
            Stock equivalents (stock options)       131       342       151       346
                                                -------   -------   -------   -------

Weighted average shares of Common
    Stock and Common Stock equivalents
    outstanding                                   9,689    10,813     9,656    10,804
                                                =======   =======   =======   =======

Net income                                      $ 3,080   $ 2,132   $ 4,848   $ 5,540
                                                =======   =======   =======   =======


Basic earnings per share                        $  0.32   $  0.20   $  0.51   $  0.53
                                                =======   =======   =======   =======
Diluted earnings per share                      $  0.32   $  0.20   $  0.50   $  0.51
                                                =======   =======   =======   =======

</TABLE>
% Predict blood CPY and urine TCPY levels

% Drinking water concentrations from Orestimba Creek Site 3 120 days.xlsx % Adults % Cecilia Tan % Jan 21, 2016

% Setting model parameters use human_parameters_MRP use preg_female_parameters BWSW=1; % Set BW to a fixed value BWST=72.9; % Set BW to 72.9 kg PREG=0; % Not pregnant DT(1) = 0.0; DORAL(1) = 0.0; TSTOP=2880; % Exposure duration in hrs

%TO READ IN DOSES FROM AN EXCEL SPREADSHEET. must be saved as .xls VOLUME=1.71062 % Water consumption volume in L/DAY EVENTS=4 % Drinking frequency per day DT = xlsRead("Drinkingwater.xls", "Creek", "A2:A482") ; % Dosing Times AMTCDOSE=xlsRead("Drinkingwater.xls", "Creek", "B2:B482")*VOLUME/EVENTS; % Dose in ug/l prepare time rbcce cv urinetcpy cvo start@nocallback

% Output RBC AChE, venous blood conc for cpf, urine TCPY conc, venous blood conc for oxon mytable = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6 _cvo*334.5]; % Output unit ug/L for concentrations save mytable @file='orestimba_adult_01222016.txt' @format=ascii
**Exhibit 31****CERTIFICATION**I, Robert J. Brilon, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of InPlay Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation;  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         Date: March 15, 2006 By: /s/ Robert J. Brilon             Robert J. Brilon
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION





The
undersigned, Thomas C. Shields, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2010 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.








Dated:
April 28, 2010




By:
            /s/
      Thomas C. ShieldsThomas
      C. ShieldsExecutive
      Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer





This
certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by
reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
by reference.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained by
ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.