alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MULLINS v. STATE.

No. 25223.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 28, 1951.

Reynold M, Gardner, Amarillo, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary and given a term of eight years in the state penitentiary.

The testimony shows a breaking of the store of A. F. Smith in Amarillo, the entry being made through a window, and a sum of money taken therefrom out of a cash box and cash register. Some time later, a sack containing money, identified as being similar to the lost money, as well as the wrappings thereon being similar to the ones lost by Mr. Smith, were located hidden by a po-st on the roadside in the suburbs of Amarillo. A peace officer, having been notified thereof, found this sack of money. He emptied the money and filled the sack with rocks and then replaced it. Soon thereafter, the appellant and a woman companion drove up in her car. He went to the point where the sack was concealed' and picked it up." Finding that the same was filled with rocks, he discarded it. Both occupants of the car were soon thereafter arrested. The woman with the appellant was his ex-wife and the mother of his child, and both were taken to jail.

Appellant was desirous of having his ex-wife exonerated and discharged. He made one written statement relative to this burglary which was not introduced in evidence. However, the ^ ex-wife was discharged. Eventually, the next day, he made a written statement to the sheriff which was introduced in evidence, the objections to which comprise practically all the bills of exception herein. The sheriff took this statement and reduced the same to writing and same was signed by appellant. In his oral testimony before the jury the sheriff merely stated: “Yes, I gave the warning; told him that he did not have to make any statement at all, and any statement he might make would be used against him.”

It will be noted that the sheriff did not go further and say “on his trial for the offense concerning which the confession is therein made.” However, it is noted that the written confession introduced in evidence did *979contain such omitted phrase, and it is also shown that appellant read such statement and signed the same.

We think the case of Oglesby v. State, 148 Tex.Cr.R. 393, 187 S.W.2d 555, to 'be in point, wherein it is held that a substantial compliance with Article 727, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., will be sufficient, provided all elements of such statute are embraced in such warning.

It is evident that the sheriff was speaking from his recollection only of the, warning given orally, but it is further shown by the statement itself that the proper statutory warning is found in the statement thus read and signed by the appellant. See DeBeauford v. State, 95 Tex.Cr.R. 398, 254 S.W. 572.

All the bills of exception relate to this statement and its admissibility and will be overruled.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS






The Board of Directors
Gaston Federal Bancorp, Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-77657) of Gaston Federal Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated
October 26, 1999 relating to the consolidated statements of condition,
operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows as of and for
the years ended September 30, 1999 and 1998, which report is incorporated by
reference in the September 30, 1999 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Gaston
Federal Bancorp, Inc.



                                          /s/ Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.

Gastonia, North Carolina
December 27, 1999
<PAGE>

                           OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                1998 STOCK PLAN

                             STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

     Oplink Communications, Inc. (the "Company") hereby grants an option to
purchase Shares of its Common Stock to the optionee named below on the terms
and conditions set forth in this cover sheet, the Company's 1998 Stock Plan,
and Exhibit A attached hereto (together, the "Stock Option Agreement"):

<TABLE>

  <S>                                <C>
     GRANT NUMBER:                     98-492

     DATE OF GRANT:                    5/10/00

     VESTING COMMENCEMENT DATE:        4/24/00

     EXERCISE PRICE PER SHARE:         $5.00

     TOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES GRANTED:   350,000.00

     TYPE OF OPTION:                    X   INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION
                                       ---
                                            NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION
                                       ---
     EXPIRATION DATE:                  MAY 10, 2010

</TABLE>

EXERCISE SCHEDULE:

     The option granted hereunder may be exercised, in whole or in part,
based on the vesting schedule as set forth below.

     Twenty-five percent (25%) of the shares subject to the option shall vest
in the holder thereof on the one year anniversary of the Vesting Commencement
Date and an additional one-forty-eighth (1/48) of the shares subject to the
option shall vest in the holder thereof at the end of each full month
thereafter; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that in the event of change of control at the
Company, and only in such event, the aforesaid vesting schedule shall
accelerate at such a rate that a maximum of one-fourth (1/4) of the shares
subject to the option shall be allowed to vest immediately..

     BY SIGNING THIS COVER SHEET, YOU AGREE THAT THIS STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS COVER SHEET, THE 1998 STOCK
PLAN AND EXHIBIT A, WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART OF THIS DOCUMENT.

OPTIONEE:                                 Oplink Communications, Inc.
                                          a California corporation

/s/ Bruce D. Horn                         By /s/ Joe Liu
-----------------------------               --------------------------------
Bruce D. Horn                               Joe Liu, Chief Executive Officer
Case 2:22-cr-00030-Z-BR Document 104 Filed 09/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 244
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM KALAN GOLD
CORPORATION UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE
RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          11,847
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  743,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               761,874
<PP&E>                                       1,992,523
<DEPRECIATION>                                 591,861
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,754,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          699,668
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           973
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,824,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,754,397
<SALES>                                        791,132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               791,132
<CGS>                                          775,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  761,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (230,211)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (230,211)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (230,211)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**
 I, R. Llee Chapman, certify that:
  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Apollo Gold Corporation;
  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
  5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
  
 ****Date: November 15, 2004

/s/ R. Llee ChapmanR. Llee Chapman,
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of American Architectural Products Corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-Q Report") that:

         (1) the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.



Dated: August 21, 2002

/s/ Joseph Dominijanni
----------------------
Joseph Dominijanni
Chief Executive Officer of American Architectural Products Corporation




Dated: August 21, 2002

/s/ Douglas J. Thomas
---------------------
Douglas J. Thomas
Chief Financial Officer of American Architectural Products Corporation
Clean	Power	Plan	Goal	Computation	Call	with	the	State	of	Wyoming	

07/18/2014

Discussion	Questions

1. How did EPA determine a 6% heat rate adjustment was appropriate for Wyoming power 

plants?

2. What costs did EPA review related to energy efficiency projects to make their determination 

to adjust the heat rate?

3. What demonstration has EPA made to show the 907 lb/MW-hr is appropriate for the 

Cheyenne Prairie Generating Station? EPA's GHG permit limited emissions to 1,100 lb/MW-hr 

CO2.

4. How is EPA going to account for states who are primarily exporters of energy vs. states that 

import their energy?

5. Did EPA consider each state's unique position when it comes to determining energy growth?

6. EPA uses a 6% growth factor each year for wind generation starting in 2017 and ending in 

2029. Were the logistics for expanding and enhancing the power grid to handle this calculated 

wind energy production?

7. With wind energy growth, were other environmental issues, particularly those involving 

endangered species and potential bird deaths, considered in the growth of wind energy as other 

environmental factors would hinder expanding renewable energy?

8. The 6% factor for Western Region wind growth factor was determined by EPA (using the 

NREL "Beyond Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS)" report for the Western U.S.) as a regional 

average. However, Wyoming exports 74% of it's current wind energy per the NREL report. Can 

EPA clarify the need to expand it's wind generation as Wyoming has no RPS obligations with outof-state demand driving Wyoming's energy generation portfolio?

9. Expanding on question #8, did EPA consider electricity transport across state lines or did EPA 

consider each state as it's own entity in the state goal calculations where generation = usage for 

each state? (It would seem any state that is a net generator would be hindered by this rule 

regardless of the state's energy generation portfolio.)

10. (see #1) In determining increased boiler efficiency, were boiler design, coal properties (BTU 

value), and location logistics (elevation) taken into account for boilers across the United States 

or were simplified assumptions used in a "one size fits all" approach?

11. How did EPA get 220 MW for Cheyenne Prairie Station and will they please redo their 

numbers to fix this?
OCTOBER TERM, 1749.

#### Stephen Lewis *against*John Cooke.

THIS vías an action of trespass for breaking the plaintiff’s close, and expelling and amoving him from the possession thereof. The defendant pleaded that he was put in possession of the land by a writ of *habere facias posses*sionem., executed in due form of law. Replication. *De injuria sua*propria. To which the defendant rejoined, that he entered by virtue of the writ of *habere facias pos*sessionem, and thereof put himself on the country. The plaintiff demurred generally to the rejoinder. The Court gave judgment on the demurrer for ithe plaintiff, and awarded a writ of inquiry of damages, which was executed and *160returned to this term, by which inquisition damages were assessed to 296/. and as only damages to the amount of 200/. were laid in the declaration, the plaintiff’s attorney directed a release to be entered for 96/. part of the dama-. ges assessed by the inquisition. Judgment being entered thereon, the defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals.

*Bordley*and Dorsey, for the appellant.

Darnall, *Calder*and Camming, for the appellee.

The Court of Appeals at *February*Term, 1752, affirmed the judgment of the Provincial Court.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3588 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2013 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to exempt fire hydrants from the prohibition on the use of lead pipes, 

fittings, fixtures, solder, and flux. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3588 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Fire Safe3 ty Act of 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXEMPTING FIRE HYDRANTS FROM PROHIBITION 

5 ON USE OF LEAD. 

6 Section 1417(a)(4)(B) of the Safe Drinking Water 

7 Act is amended by inserting ‘‘fire hydrants,’’ after ‘‘show8 er valves,’’. 

9 SEC. 3. EVALUATION OF SOURCES OF LEAD IN WATER DIS10 TRIBUTION SYSTEMS AND ALTERNATE ROUT11 ING SYSTEMS. 

12 The Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

13 Agency shall— 

14 (1) consult with and seek the advice of the Na15 tional Drinking Water Advisory Council on potential 

16 changes to the regulations pertaining to lead under 

17 the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et 

18 seq.); and 

19 (2) request the Council to consider sources of 

20 lead throughout drinking water distribution systems, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3588 RDS 

1 including through components used to reroute drink2 ing water during distribution system repairs. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 2, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark D. Erion, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Scientific Officer of Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

1. The annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company for the period covered by the Report.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/    MARK D.
ERION                                                                 
|                     |  |     |  | Mark D. Erion, Ph.D., President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Scientific Officer

I, Tran B. Nguyen, President, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Corporate
Secretary (Principal Financial Officer) of Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

1. The annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/    TRAN B.
NGUYEN                                                                                                          
|                     |  |     |  | Tran B. Nguyen, M.B.A. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer)
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Tossas, Yvette" <Yvette.Tossas@us.ngrid.com> Date: 7/26/2010 11:01 AM Subject: Re: EPA Survey Extension Request Attachments: pic13186.gif
Greetings, EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the following National Grid Generation facilities: Far Rockaway Port Jefferson Your request for extension has been denied. The deadline for your plant to submit Version 3 and Version 4 of the completed questionnaire remains 90 days after receipt. If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560. Sincerely, (Embedded image moved to file: pic13186.gif)

From: "Tossas, Yvette" <Yvette.Tossas@us.ngrid.com> To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Crocker, Douglas M." <Douglas.Crocker@us.ngrid.com>, "Curt, Timothy P." <Timothy.Curt@us.ngrid.com> Date: 07/20/2010 10:27 AM Subject: EPA Survey Extension Request

Dear Ms. Alicea, We at National Grid request an extension to submit EPA Survey data for the Port Jefferson (2517) and Far Rockaway (2513).

ThanksYvette Tossas National Grid Generation LLC Lead Analyst 516-545-4728

******************************************************************************** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it, are confidential to National Grid and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to this message and let the sender know.