alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 291 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 291

   Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make corrections in the 
                         enrollment of S. 1587.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                          September, 20, 1994

 Mr. Conyers submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                       considered and agreed to.

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make corrections in the 
                         enrollment of S. 1587.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (S. 1587) to revise and streamline 
the acquisition laws of the Federal Government, and for other purposes, 
the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In paragraph (2)(A) of the matter proposed to be added 
        at the end of section 3553(f) of title 31, United States Code, 
        by paragraph (2) of section 1403(c)--
                    (A) strike out ``person'' both places it appears 
                and insert in lieu thereof ``party''; and
                    (B) strike out ``subparagraph (C)'' and insert in 
                lieu thereof ``subparagraph (B)''.
            (2) In the matter proposed to be inserted in section 
        111(f)(5) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services 
        Act of 1949 by subsection (a) of section 1435, insert after 
        ``and no party'' in the second sentence the following: ``(other 
        than a small business concern (within the meaning of section 
        3(a) of the Small Business Act))''.
            (3) In the matter proposed to be added at the end of the 
        Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act by section 4101--
                    (A) strike out ``subsection (c)'' in subsection 
                (a)(2) of such matter and insert in lieu thereof 
                ``subsection (b)''; and
                    (B) strike out ``subsection (a)'' in subsection (b) 
                of such matter and insert in lieu thereof ``subsection 
                (a)(2)''.
            (4) In the matter proposed to be added at the end of the 
        Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act by section 8003, 
        strike out ``subsections (a)'' in subsection (c) of such matter 
        and insert in lieu thereof ``subsections (a)(2)''.
            (5) In subsection (c) of section 10001, strike out ``and 
        7207'' and insert in lieu thereof ``and 7206''.
```
#### Toille DABNEY, appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, appellee.

No. 24173.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 3, 1948.

No appearance for appellant. .

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for murder, punishment assessed at confinement for ninety-nine years in the penitentiary.

Appellant has filed his personal affidavit advising this court that he does not further desire to prosecute his appeal, but asks that same be dismissed, and at his request-it is accordingly so ordered.
#### Luther USSERY v. STATE.

No. 25906.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 18, 1952.

Appellant pro se.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry area; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $250.

Accompanying the record is an affidavit in proper form, executed by appellant, requesting the dismissal of the appeal.

The request is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of HepaLife Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank Menzler, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  HEPALIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date: March 30, 2007By:/s/ Frank MenzlerFrank Menzler
President and Chief Executive Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28615]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


The National Partnership Council; Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., November 15, 2000
    Place: Alan K. Campbell Auditorium, U.S. Office of Personnel 
Management, Theodore Roosevelt Building, 1900 E Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The Campbell Auditorium is located on the ground floor.
    Status: This meeting will be open to the public. Seating will be 
available on a first-come, first-served basis. Individuals with special 
access needs wishing to attend should contact OPM at the number shown 
below to obtain appropriate accommodations.
    Matters to be considered: This meeting will consist of an awards 
ceremony. The 2000 John N. Sturdivant National Partnership Award will 
be presented to this year's winners. The John N. Sturdivant National 
Partnership Award is given in recognition of outstanding labor-
management partnership activities.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jeffrey Sumberg, Director, Office 
of Labor & Employee Relations, Office of Personnel Management, Theodore 
Roosevelt Building, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 7H28, Washington, DC 
20415-0001, (202) 606-2930.

Office of Personnel Management.
Janice R. LaChance,
Director.
[FR Doc. 00-28615 Filed 11-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-U
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7383** 

CHARMEEN JABAR GRAY , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee.

Appeal from the Uni ted States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00473

- CMH

- TCB )

Submitted : January 13, 2011 Decided: January 20, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Charmeen Jabar Gray, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Charmeen Jabar Gray seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the deni al of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitu tional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gray has not made the requisite showing.
Acco rdingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process . DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 214 (Friday, November 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28391]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Mississippi River Commission.

TIME AND DATE: Begin at 1:30 p.m. and adjourn by 4 p.m., November 27, 
2000.

PLACE: Mississippi River Commission Headquarters Building, 1400 Walnut 
Street, Vicksburg, MS.

STATUS: Open to the public for observation but not for participation.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider the Wolf River, 
Memphis, Tennessee, Final Feasibility Report and Final Environmental 
Impact Statement.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Mr. Stephen Gambrell, telephone 
601-634-5766.

Frederick L. Clapp, Jr.,
Colonel, Corps of Engineers, Secretary, Mississippi River Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-28391 Filed 11-1-00; 1:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 3710-GX-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                     5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          5,106,000
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,334,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       78,000
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                8,263,000
<PP&E>                                          5,549,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,358,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 31,418,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           6,754,000
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           17,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     24,114,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   31,418,000
<SALES>                                         4,155,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,155,000
<CGS>                                           1,311,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,714,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 14,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,621,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,621,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,621,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.48)


</TABLE>
Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in open session at 3 p.m. on Wednesday, February 9, 2000, to consider the following matters:

*Summary Agenda:*                         No substantive discussion of the following items is anticipated. These matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the Board of Directors requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.                    

Disposition of minutes of previous Board of Directors' meetings.

Summary reports, status reports, and reports of actions taken pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors.

Memorandum and resolution re: Proposed amendment to Part 325—Risk-Based Capital Treatment of Recourse and Direct Credit Substitutes.

*Discussion Agenda:*                         Memorandum and resolution re: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking—New Part 332—Privacy of Consumer Financial Information.                    

The meeting will be held in the Board room on the sixth floor of the FDIC Building located at 550—17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

                        The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (                        *e.g.,*                         sign language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees needing such assistance should call (202) 416-2449 (Voice); (202) 416-2004 (TTY), to make necessary arrangements.                    

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 898-6757.

Dated: February 2, 2000.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-2889  Filed 2-3-00; 4:48 pm]

BILLING CODE 6214-01-M
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  REGARDING THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010

I,
Lawrence D. McGovern, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2010 of Heritage Commerce Corp;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: March 4, 2011

/s/ LAWRENCE D. MCGOVERN Lawrence D. McGovern Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
United States District Court 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

v. § CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:22-CR-0107-S 

§ 

VIKA LAT AI MOA (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY 

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a 

Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning 

Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed · 

within 14 days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), the undersigned District Judge 

is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea 

of Guilty is correct, · and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the 

plea of guilty, and VIKA LATAI MOA(l) is hereby adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, Wire 

Fraud. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. 

The Court adopts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and 

convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person 

or the community if released and should therefore be released under 18 U.S.C. § 3 l 42(b) or ( c ). 

SO ORDERED. 

SIGNED May 27, 2022. 

Case 3:22-cr-00107-S Document 13 Filed 05/27/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 30
#### MINCE v. STATE.

No. 24457.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 2, 1949.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for violation of the liquor laws, with a fine of $100.

The caption found in the transcript recites that the County Court of Lubbock County began its term on the 7th day of February, 1949, and it was terminated on the Sth day of March, 1949. All of the procedure in the trial of this case took place at a subsequent date. It is not shown that court was in session at the time of the trial, *930or on the date the recognizance was filed. The trial was held on the 16th day of March. The judgment was filed at 11:05 o’clock A. M. March 21st. Motion for new trial was filed at 11:10 A. M. March 18th. An amended motion for new trial was filed at 3:50 o’clock P. M. March 18, 1949. The order overruling the motion for new trial was dated March 25, 1949. The notice of appeal and the order fixing the bond on appeal is dated March 16th and filed at 2:45 o’clock P. M. on April 8th. The recognizance was entered into in open court on March 31st, 1949.

Under the foregoing state of facts, the court would have no jurisdiction to try the case nor to make the orders in it, and this Court has no jurisdiction herein to consider the matters complained of in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed.
#### WILSON v. RYAN.

No. 11198.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 10, 1942.

Miller & Dawson, of Sinton, for appellant.

David M. Stiles, of Cuero, for appellee.

SMITH, Chief Justice.

In this case now before this court on the merits in an appeal from the County Court of DeWitt County, appellant, as defendant below, filed his plea of privilege to be sued in San Patricio County. On a hearing below on the plea and controverting affidavit the trial court overruled appellant’s plea, and he appealed to this court from that order. The judgment of the trial court overruling the plea was reversed by this court and the cause ordered transferred to San Patricio County. No. 11142, Wilson v. Ryan. No motion for rehearing was filed in this court and its order became final.

In the meantime, however, the court below had proceeded to try the cause on its merits, and judgment was there rendered that plaintiff recover of defendant as prayed for. From that judgment defendant below has prosecuted his appeal to this court, and the appeal is now pending here.

Appellant has filed, and we now have before us, his motion that the judgment of the trial court’on the merits be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings in pursuance of this court’s prior order transferring the case to San Patricio County. The motion must be granted.

It having been determined by this court on the first appeal that appellant’s plea of privilege was well taken and should have been sustained by the trial court, that court was without jurisdiction to hear and determine the cause on its merits. Saulsbury v. Atlas Supply Co., Tex.Civ.App., 144 S.W.2d 930; Prothro v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 77 S.W.2d 759; O’Brien v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 80 S.W.2d 459; Slaughter Co. v. Slaughter, Tex.Civ.App., 288 S.W. 1107. This'question is properly presented in appellant’s motion to reverse and remand with instructions.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court in this case will be reversed and the cause remanded, with instructions to the Clerk of the County Court of DeWitt County, if he has not already done so, to make up a transcript of all the orders made in said cause prior to and including the order overruling appellant’s plea of privilege, certifying thereto officially, under the seal of the court, and send it with the original papers in the cause to the Clerk of the County Court of San Patricio County, as originally ordered by this court.

Reversed and remanded, with instructions.