alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Joint Status Update Page 1

(30028/769398/sdh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

BRYAN RISER, §

Plaintiff, §

§

vs. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-01014-K

§

§

ESTEBAN MONTENEGRO, §

Defendant. §

PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT’S JOINT STATUS REPORT

NOW COME Plaintiff Bryan Riser (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Esteban 

Montenegro (“Defendant”) and, in compliance with the Court’s Electronic Order of 

January 10, 2024, file this Joint Status Report regarding the status of discovery and a 

proposed briefing schedule for Defendant’s pending motion for summary judgment.

I.

Plaintiff has completed the discovery he needs to respond to Defendant’s motion 

for summary judgment.

On July 10, 2024, Plaintiff served his Designation of Experts on Defendant. The 

designation includes a report from Kevin R. Horan, a cell phone and cell site analysis 

expert, as well as a declaration from Brent Maudlin, who Plaintiff contends is a fact 

witness with personal knowledge of the case, and who is identified as a potential expert 

on criminal investigations. Defendant is determining whether he needs to depose these 

witnesses, and will have made that decision within the next 7 days. In the event that 

Defendant decides he needs to depose these witnesses, Plaintiff will not oppose those 

depositions.

Case 3:22-cv-01014-K Document 46 Filed 07/12/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID 279
Joint Status Update Page 2

(30028/769398/sdh)

II.

In order to allow Defendant sufficient time to depose Kevin Horan and/or Brent 

Maudlin in the event Defendant determines such depositions are needed, and taking into 

account current trial settings of the parties’ counsel, Plaintiff and Defendant propose the 

following briefing schedule for Defendant’s motion for summary judgment:

1) Plaintiff’s Response to Motion for Summary Judgment: September 6, 2024

2) Defendant’ Reply to Response to 

Motion for Summary Judgment: September 20,2024

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Don Tittle___________ 

Don Tittle

State Bar No. 20080200

don@dontittlelaw.com

Law Offices of Don Tittle

8350 N. Central Expressway, Suite M1085

Dallas, Texas 75206

(214) 522-8400

(214) 389-1002 (fax)

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 3:22-cv-01014-K Document 46 Filed 07/12/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID 280
Joint Status Update Page 3

(30028/769398/sdh)

/s/ Stephen D. Henninger 

THOMAS P. BRANDT

State Bar No. 02883500

tbrandt@fhmbk.com 

STEPHEN D. HENNINGER

State Bar No. 00784256

shenninger@fhmbk.com

CHRISTOPHER BRANDT

State Bar No. 24095984 

cbrandt@fhmbk.com

FANNING HARPER MARTINSON

BRANDT & KUTCHIN, P.C.

One Glen Lakes

8140 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 200

Dallas, Texas 75231

(214) 369-1300 (office)

(214) 987-9649 (telecopier)

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on July 12, 2024, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court through the ECF system and an email notice of the 

electronic filing was sent to all attorneys of record.

/s/ Stephen D. Henninger 

STEPHEN D. HENNINGER

Case 3:22-cv-01014-K Document 46 Filed 07/12/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID 281
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
      This schedule contains summary financial information extracted for the
three months ended July 2, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-2000
<CASH>                                     131,842,000
<SECURITIES>                                13,140,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               28,988,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 16,101,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           198,463,000
<PP&E>                                     172,196,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              73,320,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             330,337,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,800,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       298,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 298,949,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               330,337,000
<SALES>                                     47,517,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,517,000
<CGS>                                       23,135,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,135,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,808,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (290,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (2,621,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,485,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,879,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,606,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,606,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21


</TABLE>
9VAC5

- 40 Page 23

- A of 60

Note:

Equation in Section 8100 of Chapter 40

- Article 54 for calculating the average daily nitrogen oxide e missions.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 25, 2021

No. 04-21-00079-CV

Sharon MARKEY,

Appellant

v.

Nieva Mae MARKEY, et al,

Appellee

From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-20-292

Honorable Jose Luis Garza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

To date, appellant Sharon Markey has failed to pay the applicable filing fee in this 

appeal. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 5 provides,

A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay—

at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by statute 

or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order 

that is just.

TEX. R. APP. P. 5. 

We, therefore, ORDER appellant, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, to 

either (1) pay the applicable filing fee in this appeal or (2) provide written proof to this court that 

she is excused by statute or these rules from paying the filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1; see

also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal 

will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of March, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-17-00561-CV

Patrick MINOR,

Appellant

v.

Patrick STONE and Coker Tire Co.,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CV03485

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. No costs of appeal are assessed against appellant.

SIGNED November 21, 2018.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

** **

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Endocardial Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James W. Bullock,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ James W. Bullock    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | James W. Bullock        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | November 14, 2003       |

 

----
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

MICHAEL COLE ROPER, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 21-0483 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2009-006254-003

The Honorable Laura M. Reckart, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Amanda M. Parker

Counsel for Respondent

Michael Cole Roper, Tucson

Petitioner

FILED 2-15-2022
STATE v. ROPER

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Maria Elena Cruz, Judge Samuel A. Thumma, and Judge 

Michael J. Brown delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Michael Cole Roper seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is 

petitioner’s eighth successive petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) 

(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion.

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection  with the Annual Report of PDI, Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended  December  31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bernard C.
Boyle,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:


       (1)    The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be  retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its staff upon
request.





/s/ Bernard C. Boyle
--------------------

Bernard C. Boyle
Chief Financial Officer
March 14, 2005
New Century Capital & Consulting Corp.

     25,000,000 shares of common stock authorized- Par value $.001 par value

                                    SPECIMEN


         This certifies
         that________________________________________________________ is hereby
         issued_________________________________________________________ fully
         paid and transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder
         hereof in person or by an authorized Attorney upon surrender of this
         Certificate properly endorsed.

                  In witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this
                  Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officer(s) and
                  its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed this ________day of
                  _______________ , ____________


         ---------------------                          ---------------------
         Secretary                                      President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,658,822
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  855,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,433,188
<PP&E>                                         440,368
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,873,556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,110,507
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,761,483
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,998,434)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,873,556
<SALES>                                      1,920,052
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,044,273
<CGS>                                        1,208,033
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,286,806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,242,533)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,242,533)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,242,533)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.60)



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0306 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. WILLIAM JOSEPH CLAUS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 14, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening b rief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 6 2022

09/06/2022
Case Number: DA 22-0306
|                                                                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                     
|U.S. Refinery Catalytic Hydrotreating, Other Oils Downstream Charge Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                     
|U.S. Refinery Catalytic Hydrotreating, Other Oils Downstream Charge Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         | 493,500 | 664,300 | 682,040 | 649,031 | 651,631 | 707,054
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 628,248 | 498,648 | 499,448 | 376,648 | 346,948 | 361,948 | 369,248 | 386,632 | 386,632 | 384,600
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 390,100 | 409,100 | 410,100 | 437,279 | 537,300 |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
Exhibit  (b)  -  Section  906  Certification  of  CEO

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Stockgroup Information Systems Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marcus  New,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to   906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
     material  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.



/s/  Marcus  New
----------------
Marcus  New
Chief  Executive  Officer
March  18,  2003

This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  be  deemed  filed by the Company for purposes of
Section  18  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C21 COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2015-C21

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted in Schedule A.  

 

 

February 18, 2016

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

Brian Smith

Vice President 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

 

 

To: Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

 

 

Material Instances of Non-Compliance

 

Schedule A

 

List of Exemptions for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C21 COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2015-C21

 

On March 17, 2015, Wells Fargo made a distribution (the "March Distribution") to holders of the certificates of the Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C21, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C21. The March Distribution contained a payment error that resulted in an overpayment to a certain class and a correlating underpayment to a certain class totaling approximately $128,400. The payment error resulted from an administrative error during the deal setup.  The impact of this payment error was limited to the March Distribution.

 

On March 30, 2015, the March Distribution was revised to correct the payment error. To prevent further similar payment errors, Wells Fargo revised its deal setup for the Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C21, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C21.