alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, Robert P. Moyer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Precision Aerospace Components, Inc.(the “company”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. As the company’s sole certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the company’s most recent fiscal quarter (thecompany’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. As the company’s sole certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.       /s/ Robert P. Moyer         Robert P. Moyer    Chief Executive Officer  Date:December 22, 2006
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit-10.7
                                  June 7, 2000



Jonathan Block, Esq.
General Counsel
Salem Communications Corp.
4880 Santa Rosa Road
Suite 300
Camarillo, California  93012

                  RE:      ASSET EXCHANGE AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG COX RADIO,
                           INC., CXR HOLDINGS, INC., SALEM COMMUNICATIONS
                           CORPORATION AND SOUTH TEXAS BROADCASTING, INC., DATED
                           AS OF MAY 31, 2000, AS AMENDED (THE "ASSET EXCHANGE
                           AGREEMENT")

Dear Mr. Block:

         This letter is provided in connection with the above-referenced Asset
Exchange Agreement. Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used
herein shall have the same meaning ascribed to such terms in the Asset Exchange
Agreement.

         The parties hereby agree to amend the Asset Exchange Agreement as
follows:

         1. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF COX. Section 5 of the Asset
Exchange Agreement is hereby amended to include the following new Section 5.16:

                  5.16     QUALIFICATION. Cox is qualified under the Act and the
         rules, regulations and policies of the FCC to control the Salem FCC
         Licenses.

         2. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF SALEM. Section 7 of the Asset
Exchange Agreement is hereby amended to include the following new Section 7.16:

                  7.16     FCC QUALIFICATION. Salem is qualified under the Act
         and the rules, regulations and policies of the FCC to control the Cox
         FCC Licenses and the RRC FCC Licenses.

         Please indicate your agreement to the foregoing by signing in the space
provided below.


<PAGE>   2

Jonathan Block, Esq.
June 7, 2000
Page 2

         This letter agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original and all of which taken together shall
constitute one and the same instrument.


                                              Very truly yours,

                                              COX RADIO, INC.



                                              By:
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                       Maritza C. Pichon
                                                       Chief Financial Officer


                                              CXR HOLDINGS, INC.



                                              By:
                                                  -----------------------------

                                                       Richard F. Klumpp
                                                       Assistant Secretary

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

SALEM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
SOUTH TEXAS BROADCASTING, INC.



By:
    -------------------------------------
    Name:
    Title:


cc: James P. Riley, Esq.
    Kevin F. Reed, Esq.
Fw: API Handouts from July 28th Meeting - NAAQS Rule

Lydia Wegman to: Bryan Hubbell, Amy Lamson, Karen Martin, Susan Stone, 

John Hannon 07/29/2011 08:52 AM

Cc: "Jan King", "Sherry Russell"

History: This message has been forwarded.

Lydia Wegman

 ----- Original Message -----

 From: Lydia Wegman

 Sent: 07/29/2011 08:34 AM EDT

 To: "Echols, Mabel E." <Mabel_E._Echols@omb.eop.gov>

 Subject: Fw: API Handouts from July 28th Meeting - NAAQS Rule

Good morning, we still do not have call-in #s for the meetings today. Please respond. Thanks.

----- Forwarded by Margaret Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/29/2011 08:33 AM -----

From: "Echols, Mabel E." <Mabel_E._Echols@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: "Saleh, Azita" <Azita_Saleh@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 07/28/2011 02:57 PM

Subject: API Handouts from July 28th Meeting - NAAQS Rule

As Promised.

[attachment "Comments on O3 recon RIA 7‐22‐11 final.pdf" deleted by Margaret

Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US] [attachment "Ozone NAAQS MAPI ER‐707.pdf" deleted by Margaret

Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US] [attachment "ozone OMB 7‐28‐11 (2).ppt" deleted by Margaret

Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US] [attachment "Costs and Benefits for a Tightened Ozone NAAQS ‐v4‐final.ppt"

deleted by Margaret Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US]
Case 2:22-cr-00046-Z-BR Document 292 Filed 11/04/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 704
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 10558 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Armani Morris,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:22
- CR
- 296 - 1

**_______________________ _______**  Before **Willett, Duncan,** and **Wilson ,**  Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Armani Morris has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Morris has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rele vant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 30, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10558 Document: 00517050687 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/30/2024No. 23
- 10558

2 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsi bilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-10558 Document: 00517050687 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/30/2024
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 1257 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NM

- 124

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed c ell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost T otal Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet
Removal of parts and installation of Kit 18.5 $85 $13,329 $ 14901.50 4 $ 59606 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: 0 

### Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 59606. 0 

### C osts covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 0

**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can als o be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regul atory Flexibility Act:**  Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 136

Providing for an adjournment of the House from Friday, August 6, 1993,

Saturday, August 7, 1993, Monday, August 9, 1993, or Tuesday, August

10, 1993, to Wednesday, September 8, 1993, and a recess or adjournment of the Senate from Friday, August 6, 1993, Saturday, August

7, 1993, or Sunday, August 8, 1993, to Tuesday, September 7, 1993.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 6, 1993

Mr. GEPHARDT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the House from Friday,

August 6, 1993, Saturday, August 7, 1993, Monday,

August 9, 1993, or Tuesday, August 10, 1993, to

Wednesday, September 8, 1993, and a recess or adjournment of the Senate from Friday, August 6, 1993, Saturday, August 7, 1993, or Sunday, August 8, 1993, to

Tuesday, September 7, 1993.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on Friday,

3 August 6, 1993, Saturday, August 7, 1993, Monday, Au4 gust 9, 1993, or Tuesday, August 10, 1993, pursuant to

5 a motion made by the Majority Leader, or his designee,
2

HCON 136 ATH

1 it stand adjourned until noon on Wednesday, September

2 8, 1993, or until noon on the second day after Members

3 are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this

4 concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that

5 when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of busi6 ness on Friday, August 6, 1993, Saturday, August 7,

7 1993, or Sunday, August 8, 1993, pursuant to a motion

8 made by the Majority Leader, or his designee, in accord9 ance with this resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned

10 until Tuesday, September 7, 1993, at such time as may

11 be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the

12 motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second

13 day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to

14 section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs

15 first.

16 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

17 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

18 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead19 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

20 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

21 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28836]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD

Public Hearing

    The National Transportation Safety Board will convene a public 
hearing beginning at 9:30 a.m., local time on Wednesday, November 15-
16, 2000, at the NTSB Board Room and Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant 
Plaza, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20024 concerning Pipeline Safety. For 
more information, contact Joseph Kris, NTSB Office of Pipeline and 
Hazardous Materials Safety at (202) 314-6539 or Keith Holloway, NTSB 
Office of Public Affairs at (202) 314-6100.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodation should contact Mrs. 
Carolyn Dargan at (202) 314-6305 by Thursday, November 9, 2000.

    Dated: November 6, 2000.
Rhonda Underwood,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-28836 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-10126

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CODY LADELL BLUE, also known as Trigger,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:17-CR-142-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Cody Ladell Blue has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Blue has filed a motion for appointment of new counsel in response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 11, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-10126 Document: 00514792145 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2019
No. 18-10126

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Blue’s pro se 

motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED. Cf. United States v. 

Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

 Case: 18-10126 Document: 00514792145 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2019
(logo)LNR

          Partners, LLC

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

OF

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw,being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the “Special Servicer”), as special servicerunder the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactionslisted on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to anylimitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, onbehalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officerof the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

 

1.            A review ofthe activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencingon January 1, 2019 and ending on December 31, 2019 (or any other shorter periodset forth on Schedule I hereto) (the “'Reporting Period”), and of theSpecial Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement hasbeen made under my supervision; and

 

2.            To the bestof my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicingcriteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liabilitycompany

 

 

By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw

President

 

 

Dated: February 20, 2020

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue • Suite 700 • Miami Beach,Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 • Fax: (305) 695-5601

 

 

 

**Schedule I**

 

 

MSBAM 2015-C22

Morgan Stanley Bank of AmericaMerrill Lynch Trust 2015-C22, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,Series 2015-C22

(555 11th Street NW– under MSBAM 2015-C21)

 

Kroll Bond Rating Agency,Inc.,

845 Third Avenue,  4thFloor

Attention:  CMBSSurveillance

New York NY 10022

General Contact

 

Fitch Ratings Inc.

33 Whitehall Street

Attention: CommercialMortgaged Surveillance

New York NY 10004

General Contact

 

Moody’s Investors Service,Inc.

7 World Trade Center

250 Greenwich Street

Attn: Commercial MortgageSurveillance Group

New York NY 10007

General Contact

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1221 Avenue of the Americas

New York NY 10020

James Y. Lee

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York NY 10036

Stephen Holmes

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia MD 21045

Group Notices

 

Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC

600 Third Avenue, 40thFloor

Att:  BANK 2018-BN11

New York NY 10016

Group

 

Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation

1100 North Market Street

Wilmington DE 19890

Group
#### BEEVERS v. STATE.

No. 26056.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 19, 1952.

No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for a violation of the liquor law in Marion County. The punishment assessed is a fine of $150.

All matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60637 Summary Calendar

SERGIO ACOSTA-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

A93 216 844

- - - - - - - - - - February 12, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Sergio Acosta-Hernandez seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA’s) order denying him discretionary relief from a final order of exclusion. He asserts that, in declining to grant him such relief, the Board failed to attach appropriate weight to his positive attributes and erroneously placed too great an emphasis on his conviction for possession of marihuana with intent to distribute.No. 97-60637 -2- Because Acosta’s exclusion proceedings were pending as of the effective date of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA) but a final order was not entered until after September 30, 1996, the IIRIRA’s transitional rules apply to his case. See Lerma de Garcia v. INS , 141 F.3d 215, 216 (5th Cir. 1998). As a result, this court is without jurisdiction to hear any appeal from the order of exclusion or from the Board’s denial of discretionary relief from this order. See IIRIRA § 309(c)(4)(E) & (G) (codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (Supp. 1998)). Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED.
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|West Coast (PADD 5) Crude Oil Consumed at Refineries (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|West Coast (PADD 5) Crude Oil Consumed at Refineries (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 36     | 0      | 5      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 4      | 2      | 0      | 1      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025