alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEFENDANT, MCGAUGHEY, REBER AND ASSOCIATES, INC., MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO FILE AN ORIGINAL ANSWER

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

ROBERT (BOB) ROSS; §

§

 Plaintiff, §

§

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:22-CV-00343

§

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, 

MCGAUGHEY, REBER AND 

ASSOCIATES, INC. JULIE 

HENDRICK AND ERIK HARRIS,

DEFENDANTS

§

§

§

§

§

§

 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ORIGINAL 

ANSWER

COMES NOW Defendant, McGaughey, Reber and Associates, Inc., by and through 

counsel, Michael R. Rake, and moves this Court to allow Defendant McGaughey, Reber and 

Associates more time to respond to Plaintiff’s Original Complaint, and in support of said motion, 

state as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s Original Complaint was served on the Texas Secretary of State’s office, 

and not on M. S. McGaughey, the agent for service of process for the Entity as 

alleged in the Affidavit of Service. The service was executed at the address for the 

Secretary of State, and no attempt, to Defendant’s knowledge was ever made to 

serve Mr. McGaughey at his address;

2. Defendant, McGaughey, Reber and Associates, Inc. nor its agent has received a 

copy of the citation from the Secretary of State.

3. Defendant was first aware of the service when another Defendant’s attorney 

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 15 Filed 05/27/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 136
DEFENDANT, MCGAUGHEY, REBER AND ASSOCIATES, INC., MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO FILE AN ORIGINAL ANSWER

Page 2 of 2

forwarded the Affidavit of Service by e-mail to the undersigned Attorney.

4. This Defendant requests a 30 day extension, or a lessor time, should the Court 

chose, to file an Answer.

5. Defendant’s Attorney attempted to contact Plaintiff’s Attorney, by phone and email to discuss this Motion, but has received no response at this time.

Defendant prays that the Court grant this Motion for extension of time.

Respectfully submitted,

/S/ Michael R. Rake

Michael R. Rake, Attorney at Law

 SB # 16487600

 P.O. Box 1556

 Lake Dallas, TX 75065

 Tel. & Fax: 940-498-2103

 E-mail: mrake1@mrakeattorney.com

 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT,

MCGAUGHEY, REBER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

Certificate of Service

This certifies that this document was served in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure on May 27, 2022.

/S/ Michael R. Rake

Michael Rake

Certificate of Conference

This certifies that Defendant’s Attorney attempted a conference with Plaintiff’s Attorney 

of record but was not successful in reaching, Plaintiff’s Attorney via phone or e-mail.

/S/ Michael R. Rake

Michael R. Rake

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 15 Filed 05/27/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 137
Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on December 6, 1999, Mallinckrodt, Inc., Mallinckrodt & Second Streets, St. Louis, Missouri 63147, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of dihydromorphine (9145), a basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule I.

Mallinckrodt, Inc. plans to isolate dihydromorphine as a step in a multistep synthesis of hydromorphone.

Any other such applicant and any person who is  presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration.

Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than (April 10, 2000).

Dated: January 28, 2000.

John H. King,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-2872  Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

by the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of LION, Inc., a Washington corporation
(the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of David
Stedman, Interim Chief Executive Officer, and Steve Thomson, Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that to his knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934; and                               
|    |                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                 |  |                         |  | 
|-------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|INTERIM CHIEF EXECUTIVE
 OFFICER |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                                 |  |                        
|/s/ David Stedman                |  | /s/ Steve Thomson      
|                                 |  |                         |  | 
|David Stedman                    |  | Steve Thomson          
|                                 |  |                        
|August 14,
 2007                 |  | August 14,
 2007       
|                                 |  |                         |  | 

1

---
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Halo Holdings Group, LLLP * From the 161st District Court

and Travis Holm, of Ector County,

Trial Court No. B-139,607.

v. No. 11-16-00079-CV * April 14, 2016

Light Tower Rentals, Inc., * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance 

with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason 

of this appeal are taxed against Halo Holdings Group, LLLP and Travis Holm.
confidential











ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE







Reference
is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special
Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,as Certificate Administrator,
as Tax Administrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS2 (the "Agreement").
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of
this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.







|                  | 
|----------------- | 
|Leslie Hayton     | 
|Managing Director | 
|Wells Fargo Bank  | 























confidential
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Availability; Correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects a notice relating to the availability of Draft Regulatory Guides DG-1102 and DG-1103, appearing in the                         **Federal Register**                         on October 31, 2000 (65 FR 65024). This action is necessary to correct the accession numbers listed in the notice for viewing the electronic copies of the draft guides.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        John P. Segala, Division of Systems Safety and Analysis, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone 301-415-7162 (e-mail:                         *jps1@nrc.gov*).                     

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         dated October 31, 2000, page 65024, second column, third paragraph, fourth sentence, the third and fourth lines are corrected to read as follows: ML003756180 for DG-1102 and ML003756467 for DG-1103.                     

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 1st day of November, 2000.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

David L. Meyer, 

Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of Administration. 

[FR Doc. 00-28497 Filed 11-6-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 145 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 145

Providing for an adjournment of the House from Wednesday, September 15, 
                  1993 to Tuesday, September 21, 1993.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 1993

 Mr. Hamilton submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for an adjournment of the House from Wednesday, September 15, 
                  1993 to Tuesday, September 21, 1993.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on Wednesday, September 15, 1993, it stand 
adjourned until noon on Tuesday, September 21, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
lJ.s. t)ts'f R t(:'t' (:( )tJtt'r

\oRTt iliRN lxti.tLl t("r or llix^S FILEI)

Ocr 1 1 2022

IN T}TE UNITED STATES DISTRICT C

FOR TI{E NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXA

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

V.

ROBERT JAMES MCKNIGHT

CASENO.:3:

REPORT AI\D RECOMMENDATION

CONCER}IING PLEA OF GUILTY

ROBERT JAMES MCKNIGHT, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir.

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 4 of the five-count

Indictnent filed April 5,2022. After cautioning and examining ROBERT JAMES MCKNIGHT under oath concerning each

of the subjects mentioned in Rule I l, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense

charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore

recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that ROBERT JAMES MCKNIGHT be adjudged guilty of Possession

of a Sghedule II Controlled Substance with Intent to Distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. $ 8a1(a)(1) and (b)(l)(C),

andf|ve sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the district judge,

V The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

fl The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to l8 U.S.C. $ 31a3(a)(l) unless the Court finds by clear and

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community

if released.

The Government does not oppose release.

The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under $ 3142(b) or (c).

The Government opposes release.

The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the

Government.

n The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to l8 U.S.C. $ 3la3(aX2) unless (l)(a) the Court finds there is a

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown

under $ 3 145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: October 11,2022

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. $636(bXlXB).

$

$

$

$

$

n

n

!

!

n

n

IRMA CARRILLO RAMI

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

Case 3:22-cr-00136-B Document 164 Filed 10/11/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 379
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00169-N

§

UMEKA TREYMANE MYERS (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

UMEKA TREYMANE MYERS (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th 

Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count(s) 1 of the 

Information After cautioning and examining UMEKA TREYMANE MYERS (1) under oath concerning each of the 

subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense(s) 

charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore 

recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that UMEKA TREYMANE MYERS (1) be adjudged guilty of 18 

U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(A) Theft Concerning Programs Receiving Federal Funds and have sentence imposed accordingly. 

After being found guilty of the offense by the district judge, 

☐ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. 

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release. 

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any 

other person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c). 

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release. 

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing 

evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released. 

Date: June 16, 2022 

 ______________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of 

its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United 

States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B). 

Case 3:22-cr-00169-N Document 12 Filed 06/16/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 29
#### MAXWELL STEEL COMPANY, appellant, v. Ruby Mina MAXWELL, appellee.

No. 15076.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

Dec. 2, 1949.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 13, 1950.

J. Rob Griffin, and Lattimore, Couch & Lattimore, all of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Andress & Ramsey, and Wm. Andress, Jr., all of Dallas, for appellee.

HALL, Justice.

This appeal is a companion case to Maxwell & Co. v. Maxwell, our No. 15075, this day decided by this Court and reported in 225 S.W.2d 988. The petitions were identical except as to the corporate names of the two appellants and the property involved. The two cases were tried upon the same testimony in the trial court at a single hearing. Separate appeal bonds were made and duplicate records were filed in this Court. The same points of error are presented in each and duplicate briefs were filed and the appeals were submitted together.

What we have said in the original and concurring opinions in No. 15075 is applicable to this appeal and need not be repeated. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court in this case, as we did in No. 15075.

SPEER, J., concurring.

McDONALD, C. J., disqualified and not participating.
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Missouri Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Missouri Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | NA     | 0      | NA     | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
**
**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AB Private Credit Investors Corporation (the “Fund”)for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), J. Brent Humphries, as Chief Executive Officer of the Fund, and Wesley Raper, as Chief Financial Officer ofthe Fund, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge: 

 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and 

 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Fund. 

 
  
Date: March 31, 2022
     /S/ J. BRENT HUMPHRIES   
J. Brent Humphries
   
Chief Executive Officer
   
(Principal Executive Officer)
  
Date: March 31, 2022
     /S/ WESLEY RAPER   
Wesley Raper
   
Chief Financial Officer
   
(Principal Financial Officer)
**