alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Enclosure A 

Negative Declarations 
SOURCE CATEGORY EPA CONTROL TECHNIQUE GUIDELINE(S)

1. Aerospace Coatings EPA-453/R-97-004, 12/97

2. Automobile and Light-duty Truck 

Assembly Coatings

EPA 453/R-08-006, 09/08; EPA 453/R-08-002, 

09/08; EPA-450/2-77-008, 05/77

3. Dry Cleaning (Petroleum) EPA-450/3-82-009, 09/82

4. Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing EPA 453/R-08-004, 09/08

5. Flexible Package Printing EPA-453/R-06-003, 09/06

6. Large Appliances Surface Coatings EPA 450/2-77-034, 12/77; EPA 453/R-07-004, 09/07

7. Magnet Wire EPA-450/2-77-033, 12/77

8. Metal Furniture Coatings EPA-450/2-77-032, 12/77; EPA-453/R-07-005, 09/07

9. Natural Gas / Gasoline Processing EPA-450/2-83-007, 12/83

10. Paper and Fabric EPA-450/2-77-008, 05/77

11. Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings EPA-453/R-07-003, 09/07

12. Pharmaceutical Products EPA-450/2-78-029, 12/78

13. Refineries EPA-450/2-77-025, 10/77; EPA-450/2-78-036, 06/78

14. Rubber Tire EPA-450/2-78-030, 12/78

15. Ships/Marine Coating EPA-453/R-94-032, 04/94

16. Synthetic Organic Chemicals EPA-450/3-84-015, 12/84; EPA-450/4-91-031, 08/93
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

LINDA LOPEZ, §

§

 Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00171-O

§

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY, §

§

 Defendant. §

FINAL JUDGMENT

This Judgment is issued pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). 

This action came on for consideration by the Court, and the issues having been duly 

considered and a decision duly rendered,

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that: 

1. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

2. The taxable costs of court, as calculated by the clerk of court, shall be borne by the party 

incurring the same. 

SO ORDERED on this 28th day of December, 2022. 

Case 4:22-cv-00171-O Document 33 Filed 12/28/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 189
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

Turnstone Systems, Inc.: 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-36342 and No. 333-57224) on Form S-8 of Turnstone Systems, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2006, with respect to the consolidated statement of net assets in liquidationof Turnstone Systems, Inc. (and subsidiaries) as of December 31, 2005, the related consolidated statements of changes in net assets in liquidation for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2005, which report appearsin the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Turnstone Systems, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Mountain View, California 

March 31, 2006
### January 17, 2013 FRRCC Webinar Attendance/Participant List
EPA HQ 1. John Reeder, Deputy Chief of Staff 2. Cynthia Jones

-Jackson, Act’g Director OFACMO 3. Mark Joyce, Associate Director for CMO/OFACMO

FRRCC Members (31) Steve Balling David Petty Peggy Beltrone Lori Berger George Boggs Richard Bonanno Dan Botts Charles (Chip) Bowling Sen. Mike Brubaker Robert Burns Robert Carlson Lawrence Clark James Ford Suzy Friedman Omar Garza Archie Hart Patrick Johnson Philip Korson Paul Martin Tom McDonald Janis McFarland Steve McNinch FRRCC Members (cont) Sec. Bill Northey Jennie Popp Anusuya Rangarajan Robert Rynning Larry Sanders Cheryl Shippentower Ann Sorensen Don Teske Dennis Treacy
EPA Regional Agricultural Advisors (19) Andrea Szylvian/R1/USEPA/US Robert Koethe/R1/USEPA/US Kristina Heinemann/R2/USEPA/US Kelly Shenk/CBP/USEPA/US Duane Robertson/R4/USEPA/US Thomas Davenport/R5/USEPA/US Gerald Winn/R5/USEPA/US Eugene Thilsted/R6/USEPA/US Damon Frizzell/R7/USEPA/US Rebecca Perrin/R8/USEPA/US Kerry Drake/R9/USEPA/US Don Hodge/R9/USEPA/US Karma Anderson/R10/USEPA/US James Werntz/R10/USEPA/US Nicholas Peak/R10/USEPA/US Robin Dunkins

– EPA RTP

### January 17, 2013 FRRCC Webinar Attendance/Participant List

Presenters Tom Christensen

- Regional Conservationist



### – Central Region USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service , **Lynda Hall**

–Chief Nonpoint Source Control Branch EPA Office of Water **Otto Doering**

– Agricultural Economist, Purdue University

Public Participants 1. Brandon Harder

– U.S. Senator Jerry Moran, Kansas Agriculture and Energy Policy 2. Nephi Cole

- Policy

Office of Governor Matt Mead, Cheyenne WY 3. Phil Walsack

- Missouri Public Utility Alliance (MPUA) 4. Jennifer Sackett Pohlenz

– Clark Hill, PLC 5. Justin Bieri the Central Colorado Water Conservancy District 

### Other EPA Carol Galloway

– EPA R7 Ginah Mortensen EPA R7 Jana Compton EPA

- Cincinnati
#### Edgar BASS, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 23952.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 3, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for murder without malice, and punishment assessed at five years in the penitentiary.

From this judgment appellant appealed. He now files his personal affidavit advising that he does not desire to prosecute his appeal further, and at his request the appeal is dismissed.
#### COOPER v. STATE.

No. 25287.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 25, 1951.

None on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Possessing whisky with no tax stamp affixed is the offense. Upon his plea of guilty before the court, appellant was assessed a fine of $100.

No bills of exception and no statement of facts accompany the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court
---:--------------------·- ····---· 

IN THE UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT· , : 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ' · 

LUBBOCK DIVISION ZD22 nr:.Y 18 PH 3: 13 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

§ 

v. § 

§ 

§ 

CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW VASQUEZ § 

CASE NO. 5:22-CR-034-H-BQ-11 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA 

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

This case has been referred by the United States district judge to the undersigned 

for the taking of a guilty plea. The parties have consented to appear before a United States 

magistrate judge for these purposes. This Report and Recommendation on Plea is submitted 

to the court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). 

The defendant appeared with counsel before the undersigned United States 

magistrate judge, who addressed the defendant personally in open court and informed the 

defendant of, and determined that the defendant understood, the admonitions contained in 

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

The defendant pleaded guilty (under a written plea bargain agreement with the 

government) to Count One of the Superseding Information, charging defendant with a 

violation of21 U.S.C. §§ 843(b), that is, Unlawful Use of a Communication Facility. After 

examining Defendant under oath the undersigned magistrate judge finds the following: 

1. Defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing 

to enter this guilty plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final 

approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge; 

2. Defendant fully understands the nature of the charges (including each 

essential element of the offense(s) charged) and penalties; 

Case 5:22-cr-00034-H-BV Document 278 Filed 05/18/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 584
3. Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea 

agreement supplement; 

4. Defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes 

to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right 

to appear before a United States district judge; 

5. Defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily; 

6. Defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; 

7. There is a factual basis for this plea; and 

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of 

guilty. 

Although I have conducted these proceedings and recommend acceptance of 

Defendant's plea of guilty, the United States district judge has the power to review my 

actions and possesses final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if 

Defendant has any objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he 

is required to make those known to the United States district judge within fourteen (14) 

days of today. 

Based on the above, I recommend that Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted, that 

Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. 

Signed May 18, 2022. 

N RYANT, 

UNITED STATES MAGIST 

Case 5:22-cr-00034-H-BV Document 278 Filed 05/18/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 585
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Form 10-K for the Year ended December 31, 2008, pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Omega Protein Corporation, certifies,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Omega Protein Corporation.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 10, 2009



/s/ ROBERT W. STOCKTONRobert W. Stockton Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Omega Protein Corporation or the certifying officer for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Omega Protein Corporation and will be
retained by Omega Protein Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 12

RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

Our consolidated ratios of earnings to fixed charges for the year ended December 31, 2008, the Successor period from
July 25, 2007 to December 31, 2007, the Predecessor period from January 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007 and the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:

Successor

PredecessorYear Ended Dec. 31,Year Ended
Dec. 31, 2008

Jul. 25, 2007 to
Dec. 31, 2007

Jan. 1, 2007 to
Jul. 24, 1007(in thousands)

2006

2005

2004Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(a)

(b)


4.92


5.05


5.53


4.94


---

---



QuickLinks
#### COOK v. STATE.

No. 22258.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 4, 1942.

W. J. Oxford, Jr., of Stephenville, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was charged in the County Court of Erath County with a violation of the liquor laws.

The caption shows that the term of court began on the 3rd day of November, 1941, and adjourned on the 2nd day of Deceth-ber, 1941. On the last day of court the *454case was submitted to the jury and a verdict of guilty was returned on the same date. Judgment was accordingly entered in the minutes of that day by the clerk. The appellant forthwith filed his motion for new trial. No action seems to have been taken until the 28th day of February, at which time the court undertook to consider the motion and entered his order overruling the same. To this action appellant excepted and gave notice of appeal.

It appears that no notice of appeal was given at the term of court at which the party was tried in accordance with the provisions of Articles 826 and 827 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Under this state of facts this court is without jurisdiction to enter any order other than to dismiss the appeal. Bennett v. State, 80 Tex.Cr.R. 652, 194 S.W. 145.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
#### WALKER v. STATE.

No. 25957.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 22, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appear regular; and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment is affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**PC MALL, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of PC Mall, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Frank F. Khulusi, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely forpurposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2)          the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periodsindicated.

 

This Certification has notbeen, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.

 
| August 9, 2010     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| /s/ Frank F. Khulusi    |   |
| Frank F. Khulusi        |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ANTONYA V. WILLIAMS, on behalf of 

herself and all others similarly situated,

 Plaintiff,

v.

FULCRUM RETAIL ENERGY, LLC d/b/a 

AMIGO ENERGY,

 Defendant.

Case No. 3:22-cv-00460-S

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

NOW COMES ANTONYA V. WILLIAMS (“Plaintiff”), by and through her attorneys, 

Sulaiman Law Group, Ltd., and, in support of her Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without

Prejudice, state as follows: 

Plaintiff, pursuant to settlement and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), hereby 

voluntarily dismisses her claims against the Defendant, FULCRUM RETAIL ENERGY, LLC 

d/b/a AMIGO ENERGY, without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney fees.

Dated: March 9, 2022 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Nathan C. Volheim

Nathan C. Volheim, Esq. (#6302103)

Counsel for Plaintiff

Admitted in the Northern District of Texas

Sulaiman Law Group, Ltd.

2500 S. Highland Avenue, Suite 200

Lombard, IL 60148

Phone: (630) 575-8181

Fax: (630)575-8188

nvolheim@sulaimanlaw.com

Case 3:22-cv-00460-S Document 9 Filed 03/09/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 24
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on March 9, 2022, a true and correct copy of the 

above and foregoing document was filed with the Court and served on all parties requested 

electronic notification.

/s/Nathan C. Volheim

Nathan C. Volheim

Case 3:22-cv-00460-S Document 9 Filed 03/09/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 25
Exhibit 10.36


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


 


TO


 


THE EQUITY RESIDENTIAL SUPPLEMENTAL


 


EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN


 


WHEREAS, Equity Residential (the “Employer”) maintains
The Equity Residential Supplemental Executive Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”),
as last amended and restated effective January 1, 2003, for the benefit of
its eligible employees;


 


WHEREAS, Section 10.1 of the Plan provides that
the Employer may amend the Plan at any time; and


 


WHEREAS, the Employer desires to amend the Plan to
eliminate the ability for individuals to establish educational accounts under
the Plan;


 


WHEREAS, the Trust desires to further amend the Plan
to eliminate the ability for participants to make elections with respect to the
receipt or deferral of dividends that would otherwise be solely paid with
respect to stock of the Employer held for the benefit of certain participants
and allocated to their Plan accounts;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Trust hereby amends the Plan as
follows effective as of January 1, 2005:


 


1.             The
name of the Plan is hereby changed to “The Equity Residential Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan” and “The Equity Residential Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan” is hereby substituted for “The Equity Residential Supplemental
Executive Retirement Savings Plan” at any place where such term appears in the
Plan.


 


2.             The
last sentence of Section 4.2(a) of the Plan is deleted and replace
with the following:


 


“Any dividends on
such shares paid to any Participant, other than any former employee of the
Employer who, as of January 1, 2005, had made an election under the terms
of the Plan in effect prior to January 1, 2005 (a “Grandfathered Former
Employee”), shall be credited to such Participant’s Account when received by
the Funding Trustee. Any dividends payable on such shares to a Grandfathered
Former Employee shall be distributed in accordance with such Grandfathered
Former Employee’s election.”


 


3.             The
following new subsection 5.2(d) is added to the Plan:


 


(d)           Notwithstanding any other provision
of this Plan to the contrary, no amount may be transferred or deposited
into an Educational Account on or after January 1, 2005.


 

















 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused this Amendment No.1
to be executed by its duly authorized officer on this 28th day of December 2005.


 


	
   

  	
  EQUITY
  RESIDENTIAL

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Bruce C. Strohm

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
     EVP –
  General Counsel

  	
   

  
					



 


ATTEST:


 


 


	
   

  	
  /s/ Jane Matz

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Assistant
  Secretary
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463, 5 U.S.C., appendix 2), notice is hereby given for the Future Flight Data Collection Committee meeting to be held November 7, 2000, starting at 9:00 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.

The agenda will include: (1) Welcome, Introductory and Administrative Remarks; (2) Review of Meeting Agenda; (3) Review Summary of Previous Meeting; (4) Receive report on the deliberations of Working Group 1 (Data Needs); (5) Receive report on the deliberations of Working Group 2 (Technology); (6) Other Business; (7) Establish Agenda for Next Meeting; (8) Date and Location of Next Meeting; (9) Closing.

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements, obtain information or pre-register for the committee should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax). Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

Issued in Washington, DC, on October 23, 2000.

Janice L. Peters,

Designated Official.

[FR Doc. 00-28300  Filed 11-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
APRIL TERM, 1763.

Lib. D. D. No. 3. fol. 519.

#### Johannes Arrants *against*Roger Dumagin.

THIS was an appeal from *Cecil*County Court. By the record it appears that an attachment against the defendant, an absconding debtor, issued on a warrant of a J ustice of the County, upon an account for *fees*due the plaintiff as sheriff of the County. The attachment was laid upon the real and personal property of the defendant. The County Court, on motion of the defendant, ordered the writ of attachment to be quashed.

The Provincial Court affirmed the judgment of die County Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-25-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-27-1997
<CASH>                                              33
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       49
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        751
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   833
<PP&E>                                             543
<DEPRECIATION>                                     252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              623
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1199
<SALES>                                            464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   464
<CGS>                                              351
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>