alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 283

Designating August 24, 1994, as ‘‘Ukrainian Independence Day’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 16, 1994

Mr. GUTIERREZ submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Designating August 24, 1994, as ‘‘Ukrainian Independence

Day’’.

Whereas Ukraine, a nation of 55,000,000 people and one of

Europe’s largest countries, seeks political and economic

support from the West and especially the United States

in fortifying its freedom;

Whereas the capitol of Ukraine, Kyiv, is a sister city of Chicago and benefits from political and cultural exchange

with the people of Chicago;

Whereas 3 years ago, on August 24, 1991, Ukraine declared

itself independent from the long colonial stranglehold of

the Soviet Union and embarked on the road to build a

sovereign, democratic nation; and

Whereas many Americans of Ukrainian descent and others

residing in the city of Chicago wish to commemorate this
2

•HCON 283 IH

third anniversary of a new era in the life of Ukraine by

promoting awareness of this historic event: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That August 24, 1994, is designated as

3 ‘‘Ukrainian Independence Day’’ and the President is au4 thorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling

5 upon the people of the United States to observe such a

6 day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

Æ
APRIL TERM, 1762.

D. D. No. 1. fol. 60.

#### Ann Bissett *against*James Bissett, Heir of David.

Johnson, for plaintiff.

Hall, for defendant.

THIS was a bill in Chancery filed, in 1761. The plaintiff, while she was wife of *David*Bissett, conveyed land to trustees, who reconveyed to her husband. This bill was filed for a reconveyance of the land, because the consideration for which *Ann Bissett*had made the conveyance, was fictitious, and because the acknowledgment was extorted by duress, beating and ill usage.

The pleas were, the deed and the act of 1715, c. 47» The plea was allowed, and the bill dismissed without costs.(a)

(a)

 In a note book of Samuel Chase, Esquire, there is the following note, made in the year 1781: “ In the case of *Bissett*and wife, in s! Chancery Court, it was determined, *(S. Bordley*assisting the Chancel» 4' lor,) that no evidence could be received to invalidate an acknowledge *“*ment of a deed, taken by two Justices agreeably to the act of Assent» “ bly.5S
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50366

Summary Calendar

 

PRESTON LINWOOD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DAN SMITH, Sheriff;

BELL COUNTY MEDICAL STAFF,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-95-CV-143

- - - - - - - - - -

September 25, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Preston Linwood, Texas state prisoner #661979, seeks leave

to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in the appeal of the grant of

summary judgment for the defendants on his civil rights claims.

By moving for IFP, Linwood is challenging the district court’s

certification that IFP status should not be granted on appeal

because his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v.

Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Because Linwood has

not demonstrated that he will raise a nonfrivolous issue on 
No. 97-50366

-2-

appeal, his motion to proceed IFP is DENIED. See Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is

frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

IFP DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
Annual Statement asto Compliance

For the Year EndedDecember 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”)

** **

*Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.,*

*Series 2015-C1*

** **

 

Pursuantto Section 10.07 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing thereferenced transaction (the “Servicing Agreement”), asan authorized officer of Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC (“Berkadia”),I hereby attest that:

 

i.                    Areview of the activities and performance of Berkadia as Subservicer during the (‘reportingperiod”) has been made under my supervision.

 

ii.                  To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Subservicer hasfulfilled, in all material respects, its obligations under this SubservicingAgreement throughout the Reporting Period and no default by the Subservicerunder the Subservicing Agreement has occurred and is continuing.

 

Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC, 

  

/s/Mark E. McCool 

MarkE. McCool

President

### February 10, 2023

 

 

Inv. 144 Lib. N
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 67282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28690]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA No. 00-2372; MM Docket No. 99-220; RM-9601 and RM-9636]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Darby and Stevensville, MT

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots Channel 300A to Darby, Montana, in 
response to a petition filed by Mountain West Broadcasting and denies 
the petition filed by The Battani Corporation requesting the allotment 
of Channel 300C2 at Stevensville, Montana. See 64 FR 34751, June 29, 
1999. The coordinates for Channel 300A at Darby are 46-01-18 and 114-
10-43. With this action, this proceeding is terminated. A filing window 
for Channel 300A at Darby will not be opened at this time. Instead, the 
issue of opening a filing window for this channel will be addressed by 
the Commission in a subsequent order.

DATES: Effective December 11, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 99-220, adopted October 11, 2000, and released 
October 20, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. 
The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800, 
facsimile (202) 857-3805.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Montana, is 
amended by adding Darby, Channel 300A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-28690 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67352-67353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28756]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-68-000]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

November 3, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 31, 2000, Natural Gas Pipeline Company 
of America (Natural) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 22, to 
be effective December 1, 2000.
    Natural states that the filing is submitted pursuant to Section 21 
of the General Terms and Conditions (GT&C) of its Tariff as the 
fifteenth semiannual limited rate filing under Section 4 of the Natural 
Gas Act and the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission) promulgated thereunder. The rate adjustments 
filed for are designed to recover Account No. 858 stranded costs 
incurred by Natural under contracts for transportation capacity on 
other pipelines. Costs for any Account No. 858 contracts specifically 
excluded under Section 21 are not reflected in this filing.
    Natural states that copies of the filing are being mailed to its 
customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion

[[Page 67353]]

to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance 
with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and 
Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance 
with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may 
be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28756 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
p.1 

RECEIVED 

OPPT CBIC 

CBIC Control Number 

357993 

20IUAN2I* AHI0:3<* 

DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts 

Chambers Works 

Deepwater, NJ 08023 

January 20, 2014 

Director, Chemical Control Division 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room 4146 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Re: EPA - HQ - OPPT - 2003 - 0012 

DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100 

PFOA Data Submittal - Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples 

November 2013 Sample Data 

Dear Chemical Control Division: 

Attached please find summaries of PFOA analytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works 

weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A in November 2013. In accordance with 

the current site NJPDES permit (NJ0005100, effective September 2011), these results are 

provided to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic discharge monitoring reports. The 

—enclosuresnnclude-two^aperandi:wo-electronicx^ 

monitoring period. 

Please note that these results reflect a new reporting limit protocol adopted by DuPont for 

PFOA. Beginning with samples collected during October 2013, laboratories have been requested 

to report PFOA results to a limit of quantitation (LOQ) that is established at the low level 

concentration standard. The LOQ reported for subject sample results is the same LOQ reported 

during the last several months. 

Sincerely, 

Albert'Patrick O'Neill 

Unit Manager-Site Manufacturing Systems/Fluoroproducts 

DuPont Chambers Works 

APO/clc
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6359

WILLIAM MORGANHERRING, IV,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES B. HUNT; MICHAEL F. EASLEY; JAMES B.

FRENCH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-984-5-CT-BO)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William MorganHerring, IV, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(A) (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

on the reasoning of the district court. MorganHerring v. Hunt, No.

CA-97-984-5-CT-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 4, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Record of Conversation:

February 4, 2016

The FAA had a discussion with BNSF and BNSF’s counsel regarding the Request for Information regarding

their petition for exemption (FAA

‐ 2014

‐ 0704). Specifically, the petitioner sought to clarify how they

intend to operate safety regarding operations within visual line of sight of the PIC/VO, operations in

VMC conditions, and operations within 500 feet within non

‐ participating individuals and structures. The

petitioner will formally respond to the Request for Information in a separate filing.
**Exhibit 13**

 

**OfficerCertifications**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code)**

 

Pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersignedofficers of Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V., a *sociedadanónima bursátil de capital variable* organized under the laws ofMexico (the “Company”), does hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge that:

 

The annual report on Form 20-Ffor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Form 20-F”) of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-Ffairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  June 30, 2009

 
|   |
|--------|
|   | /s/ Roberto González  Barrera |
|   | Name: Roberto González  Barrera |
|   | Title: Chief Executive  Officer |

 

Dated:  June 30, 2009

 

 
|   | /s/ Juan Antonio Quiroga Garcia   |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   | Name: Juan Antonio Quiroga Garcia |
|   | Title: Chief Corporate  Officer   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 The undersigned, Thomas C. Shields, Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 2, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: August 11, 2011
 By:
/s/ Thomas C. ShieldsThomas C. ShieldsChief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
  This certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated by reference.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained by ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 289 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 289

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              August 22 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
       Providing for an adjournment or recess of the two Houses.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House is in receipt of a message that the Senate has 
agreed to a concurrent resolution providing for the adjournment of the 
two Houses to noon on Thursday, September 8, 1994, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first, that the House 
shall stand adjourned in like manner; and that when the Senate recesses 
or adjourns at the close of business on Monday, August 22, 1994, or any 
day thereafter, pursuant to a motion made by the majority leader or his 
designee, in accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until noon on Thursday, September 8, 1994, or until noon on 
the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the minority leader of 
the House and the minority leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 21, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSEN,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3474 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3474

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow employers to exempt 
     employees with health coverage under TRICARE or the Veterans 
   Administration from being taken into account for purposes of the 
 employer mandate under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hire More Heroes Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. EMPLOYEES WITH HEALTH COVERAGE UNDER TRICARE OR THE VETERANS 
              ADMINISTRATION MAY BE EXEMPTED FROM EMPLOYER MANDATE 
              UNDER PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 4980H(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(F) Exemption for health coverage under tricare 
                or the veterans administration.--Solely for purposes of 
                determining whether an employer is an applicable large 
                employer under this paragraph for any month, an 
                employer may elect not to take into account for a month 
                as an employee any individual who, for such month, has 
                medical coverage under--
                            ``(i) chapter 55 of title 10, United States 
                        Code, including coverage under the TRICARE 
                        program, or
                            ``(ii) under a health care program under 
                        chapter 17 or 18 of title 38, United States 
                        Code, as determined by the Secretary of 
                        Veterans Affairs, in coordination with the 
                        Secretary of Health and Human Services and the 
                        Secretary.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to months beginning after December 31, 2013.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 11, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3474

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow employers to exempt 
     employees with health coverage under TRICARE or the Veterans 
   Administration from being taken into account for purposes of the 
 employer mandate under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
```
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 189

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that every apwinter of 1993–1994. the other former Yugoslav republics during the manitarian disaster in Bosnia-Herzegovina and propriate effort should be made to avert a hu-
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 189

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the United States, together with the inter4 national community, should make every appropriate

5 effort to ensure that the people of Bosnia6 Herzegovina have adequate medical supplies, food,

7 and other humanitarian assistance during the winter

8 of 1993–1994 in order to prevent a possible humani9 tarian disaster;
2

HCON 189 EH

1 (2) the United States should support necessary

2 and appropriate preparations to facilitate a relief ef3 fort in order to prevent a possible humanitarian dis4 aster;

5 (3) all parties should cooperate with the provi6 sion of humanitarian assistance to those in need

7 throughout the former Yugoslav republics, especially

8 Bosnia-Herzegovina;

9 (4) the United States should provide similar as10 sistance to the peoples endangered this winter

11 throughout the former Yugoslav republics, especially

12 the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia; and

13 (5) the United States should expend appro14 priated funds for such purposes as expeditiously as

15 possible.

Passed the House of Representatives November 23

(legislative day, November 22), 1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### RANDOLPH v. STATE.

No. 24458.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 2, 1949.

Boling, Smith & Allen, Lubbock, for appellant.

E. W. Boedeker, County Attorney, Level-land, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for unlawfully transporting whisky in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $100.

Appellant was apprehended while driving his automobile upon a public -highway in Hockley County, a dry area. A search of the automobile revealed two pints of whisky therein.

Appellant admitted the possession and transportation of the whisky and claimed that he had purchased it in Hockley County and was taking it to his home in Lubbock County, Texas.

By his own testimony, appellant was guilty of the offense charged. The transportation of whisky in a dry area is unlawful. Art. 666 — 4(b), Vernon’s Ann.P.C.

Exceptions exist to the application of the statute but none are here applicable. The purchase of the whisky in a dry area, to be transported to the county of residence for one’s own consumption, does not make lawful the transportation of the whisky in the dry area where purchased.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.