alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-101-Y 

 § 

EISSA YANOURI-ROA (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED May 12, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00101-Y Document 24 Filed 05/12/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 43
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

July 03, 2009

Mr. Ronald G. Hole

Hole & Alvarez, P.C.

612 W. Nolana, Suite 370

McAllen, TX 78504

Mr. Richard W. Hunnicutt III

Law offices of David McQuade Leibowitz

2000 Riverview Towers

111 Soledad

San Antonio, TX 78205

RE:Case Number:  07-0240

Court of Appeals Number:  13-06-00053-CV

Trial Court Number:  C-1592-04-H

Style:MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, M.D.

v.

JULIOUS EBROM AND RICHARD HUNNICUTT

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinions and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  The judgment is enclosed.  You may obtain a copy of the opinions at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/recent.asp. If you would like opinions by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@courts.state.tx.us or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  The opposed motion for leave to file post-submission brief is granted.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure:  Judgment

**Case No. 07-0240Page 1**
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3419 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3419

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain small 
businesses from the employer health insurance mandate and to modify the 
     definition of full-time employee for purposes of such mandate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2013

 Mr. Kingston introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain small 
businesses from the employer health insurance mandate and to modify the 
     definition of full-time employee for purposes of such mandate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Fairness in Obamacare 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS ON APPLICATION OF EMPLOYER HEALTH INSURANCE 
              MANDATE.

    (a) Exception for Small Business Concerns.--Section 4980H(c)(2) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph:
                    ``(F) Exception for small business concerns.--The 
                term `applicable large employer' shall not include any 
                employer which is a small business concern (within the 
                meaning of section 3 of the Small Business Act).''.
    (b) Definition of Full-Time Employee.--Section 4980H(c) of such 
Code is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)(E), by striking ``by 120'' and 
        inserting ``by 174'', and
            (2) in paragraph (4)(A), by striking ``30 hours'' and 
        inserting ``40 hours''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to months beginning after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 11.1

                                INTERCARDIA, INC.

             STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                  (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                                      Three Months Ended                         Six Months Ended
                                                          March 31,                                  March 31,
                                             -------------------------------------     --------------------------------------
                                                   1997                1996                  1997                1996
                                             -----------------   -----------------     -----------------   ------------------

<S>                                         <C>                  <C>                     <C>                <C>  
Net Income (Loss) per Unaudited
   Consolidated Statements of
   Operations                                 $         (204)     $         (646)       $         1,018     $          2,845
                                             =================   =================     =================   ==================

Calculation of Weighted Average
   Number of Common Shares and
   Common Share Equivalents:
      Common Stock                                  6,742,459           5,592,721             6,741,058            4,547,453
      Series A Preferred Stock                              -             243,559 (1)                 -              468,090 (1)
      Stock Options and Warrants                            -                   -               382,386              339,820 (2)
                                             -----------------   -----------------     -----------------   ------------------
                                                    6,742,459           5,836,280             7,123,444            5,355,363
                                             =================   =================     =================   ==================

Net Income (Loss) per Common Share            $        (0.03)     $        (0.11)       $          0.14     $           0.53
                                             =================   =================     =================   ==================


</TABLE>

--------------
(1)      All of the Series A Preferred shares were issued within one year of the
         initial filing date of Intercardia's initial public offering and are
         therefore treated as outstanding in accordance with Staff Accounting
         Bulletin Topic 4-D.

(2)      Includes stock options and warrants granted within one year of the
         initial filing date of Intercardia's initial public offering, which are
         treated as outstanding in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin
         Topic 4-D. The amount is net of 60,882 shares that would be repurchased
         under the treasury stock method.


<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration 

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of October 19, 2000 (65 FR 62722). The notice announced a meeting of the Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee, which was scheduled for November 16, 2000. The document was published with an error. This document corrects that error.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anita Prout, Committee Management Office (HFA-306), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-5503. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. 00-26787, appearing on page 62722 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of Thursday, October 19, 2000, the following correction is made:                 

1. On page 62722, in the first column, under the “Location” caption, “Holiday Inn, Grand Ballroom, Two Montgomery Village Ave., Gaithersburg, MD.” is corrected to read “CDER Advisory Committee, conference room 1066, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD.” 

Dated: October 31, 2000. 

Linda A. Suydam, 

Senior Associate Commissioner. 

[FR Doc. 00-28349 Filed 11-01-00; 2:45 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Case 4:22-cr-00091-P Document 18 Filed 04/06/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 21
Case 4:22-cr-00091-P Document 18 Filed 04/06/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 22
#### SHEPHERD v. CRASE et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 9, 1952.

Isaac Turner, Hyden, for appellant.

Napier & Napier, Hazard, for appellee.

CULLEN, Commissioner.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appellant, Calloway Shepherd, sought custody of a minor child. Judgment denying his petition and dismissing the proceeding was entered on March 1, 1952. The appeal was filed in this Court on April 10, 1952.

Under Section 429-1 of the Criminal Code of Practice, an appeal in a habeas corpus proceeding must be filed within 10 days after the entry of the judgment. This appeal was not filed in time, and the Court therefore does not have jurisdiction. Matthews v. Buchanan, Ky., 238 S.W.2d 1001.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit
32.2
 CERTIFICATION
 
 The
undersigned, Thomas C. Shields, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 3, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
November 5, 2009
  By:
                  /s/
      Thomas C. ShieldsThomas
      C. ShieldsExecutive
      Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer
  This
certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by
reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
by reference.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained by
ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of American Architectural Products Corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-Q Report") that:

          (1) the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2002

/s/ Joseph Dominijanni
-----------------------------------
Joseph Dominijanni
Chief Executive Officer of American Architectural Products Corporation






Dated: November 14, 2002

/s/ Douglas J. Thomas
----------------------------------
Douglas J. Thomas
Chief Financial Officer of  American Architectural Products Corporation
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 2445

MARIA ANTONIA LOVATO

- GRANADOS; K.N.C.L. , Petitioner s ,

v. WILLIAM P. BARR , Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : July 29, 2020 Decided: August 19, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Aaron R. Caruso, ABOD & CARUSO, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland , for Petitioner s
. Joseph H . Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Anthony P. Nicastro, Assistant Director, Jonathan Robbins, Senior Litigation Counsel , Office of Immigration Litigation , Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTIC E, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Maria Antonia Lovato

- Granados and her minor daughter, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ( “ Board ” ) dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying Lovato

- Granados’ application s for asylum , withholding of removal , and protection under the Convention Against Torture

. We have considered the Petitioners’ claims after thoroughly reviewing the record and conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2018) , and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, see INS v. Elias

- Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992)

. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
See In re Lovato

- Granados (B.I. A. Nov. 27, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITTION DENIED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6135

LEE ROY SMITH,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

MICKEY E. RAY, Warden, Federal Correctional

Institution-Edgefield; J. D. CASTILLO, Health

Services Administrator, Federal Correctional

Institution-Edgefield; JOSE A. SERANNO, M.D.

and Clinical Director of Federal Correctional

Institution-Edgefield; JUAN F. CARMONA, JR.,

Lieutenant, Federal Correctional

Institution-Edgefield; LISA MORGAN-JOHNSON,

Counselor, Federal Correctional

Institution-Edgefield; JACK FOX, Unit

Manager, Federal Correctional

Institution-Edgefield; DOUGLAS HOLFORD,

Contracted Orthopedic Specialist, Federal

Correctional Institution-Edgefield,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-02-2627-8-18AJ)

Submitted: June 24, 2004 Decided: June 30, 2004

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

Lee Roy Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina; David Austin

Brown, Aiken, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Lee Roy Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing his claims against all defendants except one. This

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Smith seeks to

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PDI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles T. Saldarini, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Charles T. Saldarini
------------------------

Charles T. Saldarini
Chief Executive Officer
March 10, 2003
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 226

Expressing the sense of Congress that any welfare reform legislation which

requires recipients of aid to families with dependent children to find

employment within a certain time as a condition of receiving benefits

should exempt recipients who collect benefits from a State with an

unemployment rate that is at least 110 percent of the national average

unemployment rate.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 17, 1994

Mr. MACHTLEY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that any welfare reform

legislation which requires recipients of aid to families

with dependent children to find employment within a

certain time as a condition of receiving benefits should

exempt recipients who collect benefits from a State with

an unemployment rate that is at least 110 percent of

the national average unemployment rate.

Whereas a number of States in a given year have annual average unemployment rates that greatly exceed the national average unemployment rate;
2

•HCON 226 IH

Whereas, in States with unemployment rates that are at least

110 percent of the national average, it is far more difficult to find a job;

Whereas, in addition to the roughly 5,000,000 families who

are currently receiving aid to families with dependent

children (AFDC), there are approximately 8,700,000 people who are actively looking for work, and another

6,000,000 jobless who are discouraged from looking for

work;

Whereas only 7 percent of the roughly 5,000,000 families receiving AFDC are headed by a mother who works even

part-time;

Whereas AFDC parents trying to get work and get off welfare face the realities of a labor market that is increasingly dominated by low-wage, part-time, and temporary

jobs that cannot support a family;

Whereas AFDC is the major cash welfare program for families and serves 1 in 7 children;

Whereas requiring AFDC recipients to find a job within a

certain time discriminates against those who receive benefits from States with exceptionally high unemployment

rates;

Whereas private sector jobs, public sector jobs, and community service work jobs are not available in States with

high unemployment rates;

Whereas, in 1993, 11 States had unemployment rates that

were at least 110 percent of the 1993 national average

unemployment rate of 6.8 percent; and

Whereas, in 1992, 12 States had unemployment rates that

were at least 110 percent of the 1992 national average

unemployment rate of 7.4 percent: Now, therefore, be it
3

•HCON 226 IH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that any wel3 fare reform legislation which requires recipients of aid to

4 families with dependent children to find employment with5 in a certain time as a condition of receiving benefits should

6 exempt recipients who collect benefits from a State with

7 an unemployment rate that is at least 110 percent of the

8 national average unemployment rate.

Æ
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 189 Engrossed in House (EH)]

              103d CONGRESS

               1st Session

H. CON. RES. 189

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that every appropriate effort 
 should be made to avert a humanitarian disaster in Bosnia-Herzegovina 
and the other former Yugoslav republics during the winter of 1993-1994.






103d CONGRESS

                              1st Session
H. CON. RES. 189


_______________________________________________________________________


                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the United States, together with the international 
        community, should make every appropriate effort to ensure that 
        the people of Bosnia-Herzegovina have adequate medical 
        supplies, food, and other humanitarian assistance during the 
        winter of 1993-1994 in order to prevent a possible humanitarian 
        disaster;
            (2) the United States should support necessary and 
        appropriate preparations to facilitate a relief effort in order 
        to prevent a possible humanitarian disaster;
            (3) all parties should cooperate with the provision of 
        humanitarian assistance to those in need throughout the former 
        Yugoslav republics, especially Bosnia-Herzegovina;
            (4) the United States should provide similar assistance to 
        the peoples endangered this winter throughout the former 
        Yugoslav republics, especially the former Yugoslav Republic of 
        Macedonia; and
            (5) the United States should expend appropriated funds for 
        such purposes as expeditiously as possible.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 23 
      (legislative day, November 22), 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`