alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 14.1



CODE OF ETHICS

for

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.

and

EAGLE FAMILY FOODS, INC.



This Code of Ethics applies to all executive officers of Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiary Eagle Family Foods, Inc.
(collectively, the Company). The Company expects all of its employees to act in accordance with the highest standards of personal and professional integrity in all aspects of their activities, to comply with all applicable laws, rules
and regulations, to deter wrongdoing and abide by all procedures adopted by the Company that govern the conduct of its employees.



You agree to:



| |  | Engage in and promote honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Produce full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and
other regulators and in other public communications made by the Company;
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Comply fully with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; and
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Promptly report any possible violations of this Code of Ethics to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company or the Board of Directors, as appropriate.
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



You understand that you will be held accountable for your adherence to this Code of Ethics.
Your failure to observe the terms of this Code of Ethics may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment. Violations of this Code of Ethics may also constitute violations of law and may result in civil and criminal
penalties for you, your supervisors and/or the Company.



If you have any
questions regarding the best course of action in a particular situation, you should promptly contact the Chief Executive Officer of the Company or the Board of Directors, as appropriate. You may choose to remain anonymous in reporting any possible
violation of this Code of Ethics.



Your Personal Commitment to the Code of
Ethics



I acknowledge that I have received and read the Code of Ethics for
Eagle Family Foods Holdings, Inc. and Eagle Family Foods, Inc., dated August 2004, and understand my obligations as an officer to comply with the Code of Ethics.



|                        |  |      
|----------------------- |  | -----
|Please sign here:       |  | Date:
|                        | 
|Please print your name: |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,199,810
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               36,286,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                   898,236
<INVENTORY>                                 36,290,195
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            74,588,187
<PP&E>                                      84,795,842
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,018,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             194,509,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       60,166,482
<BONDS>                                    125,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,473
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,635,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               194,509,130
<SALES>                                     77,419,565
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            77,419,565
<CGS>                                       61,591,091
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               61,591,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,039,367
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,739,943
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (899,876)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (314,956)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (584,920)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (584,920)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
### 16510075 

### NOTICE OFPUBLIC HEARING



# RECEH!ED JUL 

# 15 2013 PlacerCountyAirPollutioll Control District The above space Is reserved for Court/CountyFiled Date Stamp 

## PROOFOFPUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County ofPlacer I am a citizen ofthe United States and employed by a publication
. in the County aforesaid. I am overthe age ofeighteen years, and not a party to the mentioned matter. I am the principal clerk of The Auburn Journal, a newspaper of general circulation, in the City ofAuburn, which is printed and published in the County of Placer. This newspaper has been judged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Placer, on the date of May 26, 1952 (Case Number 17407}. The notice, of which the atteched is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil} has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 

### JULY7



### Icertify, underpenalty ofperjury, thatthe foregoing is true and correct.



### Dated in Auburn, California JULY 7,2013

PROOF OF PUBLICATION THE AUBURN JOURNAL 1030 High Street Auburn, CA 95604-5910
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
ATG Inc. on Form S-8 (file No. 333-72349 and File No. 333-89115) of our reports
dated March 28, 2000, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of ATG Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and
for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 which reports are included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


San Jose, California
May 1, 2000
United States District Court 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERJCA § 

§ 

V. § CRJMINAL ACTION NO. 3:22-CR-0117-S 

§ 

SANTIAGO SALAZAR-RAMIREZ (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY 

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a 

Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning 

Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filetj. 

within 14 days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), the undersigned District Judge 

is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea 

of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the 

plea of guilty, and SANTIAGO SALAZAR-RAMIREZ (1) is hereby adjudged guilty of 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(a), Illegal Reentry After Removal from the United States. Sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. 

The Defendant is ordered to remain in custody. 

SO ORDERED. 

SIGNED June 29, 2022. 

REN GREN SCHOLER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cr-00117-S Document 25 Filed 06/29/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 42
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00074

- CV

Gail Rigsby

v.

EECU §

§

§

§ From the 236th District Court

of Tarrant County (236

- 265926

- 13)

April 2 , 2015

Opinion by Justice Meier



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the

trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. We revers e that portion of the

trial court’s judgment that dismisses Gail Rigsby’s intentional infliction of

emotional distress, negligence, and gross negligence claims and remand this

case to the trial court to consider EECU’s motion to dismiss those claims for th e

reasons advanced in EECU’s motion to dismiss. We affirm that portion of the

trial court’s judgment that dismisses Gail Rigsby’s defamation claim.

It is further ordered that Appellant Gail Rigsby shall pay all costs of this

appeal, for which let executi on issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SkillSoft Public Limited
Company (the "Company") for the period ended October 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Thomas J. McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                      /s/ Thomas J. McDonald
                                                      --------------------------
Dated: December 15, 2003                              Thomas J. McDonald
                                                      Chief Financial Officer

                                       43
Exhibit 4.10
 
 Summary of Construction Supervision Contract with Shanghai Feng Xian Construction Management Co. Ltd.
 
 On October 4, 2009, Shanghai Jinpan Electric Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) entered into an agreement (“Agreement”) with Shanghai Feng Xian Construction Management Co. Ltd. (the “Construction Supervisor”) for construction supervision and management services for the construction of 8,500 square meters of industrial buildings under construction at the Company’s Shanghai facility.
 
 The term of the Agreement is six (6) months beginning on October 4, 2009 and ending on April 3, 2010.  The Construction Supervisor provides project management services and oversees quality and work place safety.
 
 The total price for the construction supervision and management services is RMB 105,000 payable in several installments depending on the progress of the construction. The Company agreed to pay the Construction Supervisor fifty percent (50%) of the contract price , or RMB 52,500, within 10 calendars of signing the Agreement, thirty percent (30%) of the contract price, or RMB 31,500, after completion of the main structures,  and the remaining twenty percent (20%), or RMB 21,000, after inspection and acceptance of the buildings.
#### SHELTON v. STATE.

No. 25522.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 28, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*836GRAVES, Presiding judge.

Appellant was tried before the court upon a plea of guilty to the offense of burglary, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for 12 years.

The evidence fully sustains the conviction. The record is before us without any bills of exception complaining of matters of procedure.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 206 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.206
                                       Agreed to February 10, 1994      
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on Thursday, February 10, 1994, Friday, 
February 11, 1994, Saturday, February 12, 1994, Sunday, February 13, 
1994, Monday, February 14, 1994, Tuesday, February 15, 1994, Wednesday, 
February 16, 1994, Thursday, February 17, 1994, or Friday, February 18, 
1994, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee, 
it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, February 22, 1994, or until 
noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant 
to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, February 10, 1994, Friday, February 11, 1994, Saturday, 
February 12, 1994, Sunday, February 13, 1994, Monday, February 14, 1994, 
Tuesday, February 15, 1994, Wednesday, February 16, 1994, Thursday, 
February 17, 1994, or Friday, February 18, 1994, pursuant to a motion 
made by the Majority Leader or his designee, in accordance with this 
resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, 
February 22, 1994, or at such time as may be specified by the Majority 
Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon 
on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
  Attest:







                                  Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:







                                                Secretary of the Senate.`
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wniteb**~tate5** 

# qcourt of§ppeaI5 for tbejfeberaI qcircuit

NOVO NORDISKAlS AND 

### NOVO NORDISK INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

## v. CARACO PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES, LTD. AND 

### SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., Defendants-Appellees.

2011-1223 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in case no. 05-CV-40188, Judge Avern Cohn.



### NOVO NORDISK INC. AND 

### NOVO NORDISKAlS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

## v. PADDOCKLABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.NOVO NORDISKV. PADDOCKLABS 2
2012-1031 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in case no. 10-CV-2199, Judge Donovan W. Frank.


### ONMOTION
ORDER Novo Nordisk et al. submit responses and motions concerning how these cases should proceed. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The motions are granted to the extent that the stays ofthe briefing schedules are lifted in the two abovecaptioned appeals. The appellant's opening briefin each appeal is due within 40 days of the date of filing of this order. (2) Appeal 2011-1223 and 2012-1031 will be treated as companion cases, i.e., they will be argued consecutively before the same merits panel. 

## AUG 15 2012 Date

cc: Daniel G. Brown, Esq.

s8 James F. Hurst, Esq. MarkA. Perry, Esq. FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

u.s.

## eoUJt~~PEAlSFOR THEFEDERALCIRCUIT



### AUG 15 

## 201l JANHORBALY 

### CLERK
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 10 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 10

 Expressing the sense of the Congress that tax legislation should not 
  take effect earlier than 90 days after implementing regulations are 
                                issued.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

     Mr. Neal of North Carolina submitted the following concurrent 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress that tax legislation should not 
  take effect earlier than 90 days after implementing regulations are 
                                issued.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that no provision of law affecting 
the tax liability of any person should take effect earlier than the day 
90 days after the date on which regulations implementing such provision 
are issued by the Internal Revenue Service.

                                 <all>
```
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 178

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 10 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the House from Wednesday,

November 10, 1993 to Monday, November 15, 1993

and an adjournment or recess of the Senate from

Wednesday, November 10, 1993 to Tuesday, November

16, 1993.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on Wednes3 day, November 10, 1993, it stand adjourned until noon

4 on Monday, November 15, 1993, or until noon on the sec5 ond day after Members are notified to reassemble pursu6 ant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever

7 occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or ad8 journs at the close of business on Wednesday, November

9 10, 1993, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority

10 Leader or his designee, in accordance with this resolution,
2

HCON 178 RDS

1 it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, No2 vember 16, 1993, or at such time as may be specified by

3 the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess

4 or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members

5 are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this

6 concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

7 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

8 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

9 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead10 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

11 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

12 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives November 10,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
##### 



Exhibit 12(a)(2)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Gruma, S.A. de C.V. (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Juan Antonio
Quiroga García, Chief Corporate Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Juan Antonio Quiroga GarcíaName:
    
    Juan Antonio Quiroga GarcíaTitle:
    
    Chief Corporate Officer


Date: June 30, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
      S-8 No. 333-61231) dated August 12, 1998 (as amended April 11, 2005) pertaining
      to the 1998 stock option plan of PDI, Inc., Registration Statement (Form S-8
      No.
      333-60512) dated May 9, 2000 (as amended April 11, 2005) pertaining to the
      2000
      Omnibus Incentive Plan of PDI, Inc. and Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
      333-123312) dated March 4, 2005 pertaining to the 2004 Stock Award and Incentive
      Plan of PDI, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2007, with respect to the
      consolidated financial statements and schedule of PDI, Inc., PDI, Inc.
      management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
      of
      PDI, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December
      31, 2006.








/s/Ernst
      & Young LLP


New
      York,
      NY


March
      15,
      2007