Name: John M. McManus

Title: Vice President- Environmental Service

Company: American Electric Power

Sign Date: 6/30/2010

Name: Scott W. Banach

Title: Director, Project Engineering

Company: Platt Environmental Services, Inc.

Sign Date: 6/25/2010

Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date

Rockport Unit 2

Final Test Report 

for

/ /

Based on information and belief formed 

after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the 

statements and information in this test 

report are true, accurate, and complete.

I have reviewed all testing details and 

results in this test report and hereby 

certify that the test report is authentic 

and accurate.

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 1 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

Facility Information:

Rockport Unit 2

2791 N. U.S. Hwy 231

Rockport IN 47635

Contact: Paul Jackson

Phone: 614-716-3278

Fax: 614-716-1252

Email: pmjackson@aep.com

Testing Company:

Platt Environmental Services, Inc.

1520 Kensington Road

Suite 204

Oak Brook IL 60523

Contact: Scott Banach

Phone: 630-521-9400

Fax: 630-521-9494

Email: sbanach@plattenv.com

Air Permit Number:

T147-27400-00020

Permitted Source ID/Name:

T147-27400-0 MB-2

Permitted Maximum Process Rate:

12374 mmBTU/hr

Max. Normal Operation Process Rate:

12374 mmBTU/hr

Target Process Test Rate

12374 mmBTU/hr

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or

 process flow diagram:

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test 

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation 

of request AND approval, including dates.

Industry/SCC/NAIS

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information:

AFS #: FRS #:

SCC / Description 10100226 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous 

Coal - Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom Tangential (Subbituminous Coal) 

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location

Round

Duct

Diam.

Distance from 

upstream dist.

Distance from

downstream dist.

Number of

Traverse Ports

Equiv. 

Diam

Min.Travers 

Points

Rect. Duct 

Length /Width

Stack 510 0 0 0 1020 4080 4 3

Target

Parameter 

Test

Method

Number of

Test Runs

Test Run

Duration

Sample 

Location Points Comments

Stack Carbon Monoxide Method 10 3 120 0

Total organic compounds 

(TOC)

Stack Method 25A 3 120 0

Stack O2 Method 3A O2 3 120 0

Stack Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 120 0

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 2 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test 

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation 

of request AND approval, including dates.

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 3 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location Stack - Method 10

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 3/4/2010 3/4/2010 3/4/2010

Run Start Time 9:50:00 AM 12:30:00 

PM

2:52:00 PM

Run Finish Time 12:08:00 PM 2:29:00 PM 4:51:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 11.94 12.74 12.7 12.460

Oxygen, % 6.25 6.24 6.21 6.233

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 199594257 200793053 199025308 199,804,206.

000

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9948 9913 9967 9,942.667

Moisture, % 9.55 9.11 9.39 9.350

Fuel Type Override Override Override

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Location Stack - Method 25A

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 4 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Location Stack - Method 3A O2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 5 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

Emissions Summary

Process Run Data

Location: Stack - Method 10

Compound: Carbon Monoxide

Average

Run 1 2 3

lb/mmBtuO2 3.75E-01 2.61E-01 2.20E-01 0.285

ppm 3.64E+02 2.54E+02 2.13E+02 277.000

ppm@7%O2 3.45E+02 2.41E+02 2.02E+02 262.667

Location: Stack - Method 25A

Compound: Total organic compounds (TOC)

Average

Run 1-THC 2-THC 3-THC

lb/mmBtuO2 6.91E-05 2.43E-05 7.56E-05 0.000

ppm 1.56E-01 5.51E-02 1.71E-01 0.127

ppm@7%O2 1.48E-01 5.22E-02 1.62E-01 0.121

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 6 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

Process Run Data

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 Subbituminous Coal Burned 1375 1000 Tons/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1400

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 7 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

1 Gross Load 1312 MW The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1300

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 8 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

1 Steam Pressure 3783 psig The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

3800

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 9 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

1 Heat Input 13152 mmBTU/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

12374

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 10 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

2 Subbituminous Coal Burned 1375 1000 Tons/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1400

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 11 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

2 Gross Load 1312 MW The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1300

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 12 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

2 Steam Pressure 3783 psig The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

3800

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 13 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

2 Heat Input 13152 mmBTU/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

12374

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 14 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

3 Subbituminous Coal Burned 1375 1000 Tons/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1400

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 15 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

3 Gross Load 1312 MW The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

1300

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 16 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

3 Steam Pressure 3783 psig The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

3800

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 17 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data

3 Heat Input 13152 mmBTU/hr The ERT requires 

that the process 

data collected 

during the stack 

test period be 

accompanied by a 

target value. For 

the AEP tests, we 

want to clarify that 

the target value 

provided does not 

represent any limit 

or maximum 

design set point for 

operation of the 

steam generators 

and associated 

control 

equipment. In 

some cases, the 

value is a permit or 

regulatory limit, 

such as the case of 

opacity. Operation 

outside of the 

target value does 

not represent 

abnormal 

operation.

12374

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION 1000 lb/hr 1000

2 ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION 1000 lb/hr 1000

3 ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION 1000 lb/hr 1000

1 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH 

EFFICIENCY

64 sets in service 64

2 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH 

EFFICIENCY

64 sets in service 64

3 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH 

EFFICIENCY

64 sets in service 64

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 18 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location Stack - Method 10

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 3/4/2010 3/4/2010 3/4/2010

Run Start Time 9:50:00 AM 12:30:00 PM 2:52:00 PM

Run Finish Time 12:08:00 PM 2:29:00 PM 4:51:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 11.94 12.74 12.7 12.460

Oxygen, % 6.25 6.24 6.21 6.233

Fuel Factor 1.23 1.15 1.16

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 199594257 200793053 199025308 199,804,206

.000

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9948 9913 9967 9,942.667

Moisture, % 9.55 9.11 9.39 9.350

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model 0618817339 0618817339 0618817339 618,817,339

.000

Analyzer Serial Number 0618817339 0618817339 0618817339 618,817,339

.000

Operating Range 2000 2000 2000 2,000.000

Operating Units ppm ppm ppm

No. Readings/Avg. 120 120 120 120.000

Calibration Set 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID CC66906-CO CC66906-

CO

CC66906-CO

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.467

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias -29.69 0.05 0.02 -9.873

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID CC50124-CO CC50124-

CO

CC50124-CO

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 299.4 299.7 299.6 299.567

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias -0.39 -0.38 -0.38 -0.383

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID CC66906-CO CC66906-

CO

CC66906-CO

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.400

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias -29.67 0.02 0.02 -9.877

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 1.9999999999

9996E-02

0.03 0 0.017

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID CC50124-CO CC50124-

CO

CC50124-CO

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 299.7 299.6 300.6 299.967

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias -0.38 -0.38 -0.33 -0.363

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.01 0 0.05 0.020

Cavg 357.3 250 209.9 272.400

Cavg Units ppmvd ppmvd ppmvd

Cgas 363.5608 254.1289 213.0563 276.915

Cgas Units ppmvd ppmvd ppmvd

Fuel Type Override Override Override

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 19 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

Cgasw Units

Location Stack - Method 25A

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 20 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 21 of 22
Rockport Unit 2

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 Page 22 of 22