alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Application of ) 

) 

Antair S.A. DE C. V. ) 

) 

) 

) 

for an exemption pursuant to ) 

49 u.s.c. 40109 ) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. OST -96-1928 

APPLICATION OF 

ANT AIR S.A. DE C.V. 

FOR RENEWAL OF EXEMPTION 

Communications concerning this document may be sent to: 

August 29, 2011 

Robert Givens 

Givens & Johnston, PLLC. 

950 Echo Lane, Suite 360 

Houston, Texas 77024 

(713) 932-1540 

Counsel for 

Antair S.A. de C.V. 

'" t;. I I r_._..., i f• I 
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATAION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Application of 

Antair S.A. DE C.V. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

for an exemption pursuant to ) 

49 u.s.c. 40109 ) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. OST -96-1928 

APPLICATION OF 

ANT AIR S.A. DE C.V. 

FOR RENEWAL OF EXEMPTION 

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 40109 and the Department's regulations, Antair S.A. de 

C.V. hereby applies for renewal of its exemption from 49 U.S.C. 41301 which authorizes 

Antair to engage in charter foreign air transportation of persons and their accompanying 

baggage between the United States and Mexico with small aircraft and, subject to prior 

Department approval, between other countries and the United States. Antair also requests 

continuation of its stopover privileges and renewal of relief from any requirement to 

obtain advance approval for each Mexico U.S. flight. The Department granted the above 

authority to Antair by Notice of Action Taken dated September 4, 2009. The effective 

dates of authority granted extended from September 4, 2009 through September 4, 2011. 

Antair requests that this authority, which is scheduled to expire on September 4, 2011 be 

renewed for a period of two years, or alternatively for at least one year. 
., ' 

Antair invokes the automatic extension provisions of the Administrative Procedure 

Act, 5 U.S.C. 558 (c), as implemented by 14 C.P.R. Part 377, to maintain its exemption 

authority in effect pending a final Department determination on this renewal application. 

In support of this application, Antair states as follows: 

1. The relevant circumstances under which Antair received its initial grant of 

exemption authority are unchanged. 

2. Antair' s renewal application is limited in scope and non-controversial. The 

services Antair proposes to operate are substantially identical to those it 

performed during the past year, i.e. highly personalized transport services to 

executives of Antair and its related companies and their invitees using small 

private business-type aircraft. Antair's Mexican authority to engage in 

trans border charter passenger services remains in full force and effect, as does 

its U.S. authority pursuant to its FAA Part 129 Operations Specifications. 

WHEREFORE, Antair respectfully requests renewal of its authority to engage in 

charter foreign air transportation of persons and their accompanying baggage with small 

private aircraft as set forth herein, and such other relief as may be in the public interest. 

August 29, 2011 

Respectfully submitted, 

/dj)~~ 

~vens Givens & Johnston, PLLC 

Counsel for 

Antair S.A. de C.V.
Mediation Order – Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

PACIFIC PLUS INTERNATIONAL 

INC,

§

§

§

 Plaintiff, §

§

v. §

§

 Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-00853-L

NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

§

§

§

 Defendant. §

MEDIATION ORDER

After reviewing the Joint Status Report filed in this case, the court determines that this 

case is appropriate for mediation. The parties are therefore directed to participate in mediation by 

March 2, 2023. All parties shall appear in person, unless excused by the court, before a mediator 

of the parties’ mutual choosing and participate in mediation. If a party is an entity rather than an 

individual, a person with settlement authority must appear in person on behalf of the entity. 

Further, in light of the COVID-19 Pandemic, to facilitate mediation, the court allows the parties 

to conduct mediation by video teleconference or video conference as long as someone with 

settlement authority for each party attends the mediation. The mediator shall submit a report to 

the court within three days of the mediation.

In accordance with § III(G) of this court’s Civil Justice Expense and Delay Reduction Plan, 

the clerk of the court shall transmit to counsel a copy of its “Alternative Dispute Resolution 

Summary” form. Counsel shall be jointly responsible for ensuring that the mediator receives the 

form in a timely fashion. The mediator is ordered to return the form to the clerk of the court (not 

Case 3:22-cv-00853-L Document 10 Filed 08/12/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 163
Mediation Order – Page 2

to the undersigned’s chambers) in accordance with the clerk’s instructions. The mediator’s 

obligation to return the clerk’s form is separate from the obligation to submit a report to the court.

It is so ordered this 12th day of August, 2022.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-00853-L Document 10 Filed 08/12/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 164
#### WALKER et al. v. BOWLING.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 29, 1953.

Isaac Turner, Hyden,.for appellant.

Will C. Hoskins and Denver Adams, Hyden, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Leslie Circuit Court by appellant; Ralph Walker, *699■from a judgment in favor of .appellee, Clay W. Bowling, for $400 damages arising out of a collision between two motor vehicles.

A consideration of the record discloses no error prejudicial to appellant’s rights and the judgment is affirmed.'
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 159

Concerning the identification of United States military personnel involved

in United Nations and other multinational peacekeeping operations for

the purposes of the Geneva Convention.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 6, 1993

Ms. SNOWE (for herself and Mr. GILMAN) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning the identification of United States military personnel involved in United Nations and other multinational peacekeeping operations for the purposes of the

Geneva Convention.

Whereas the United States has deployed United States

Armed Forces personnel to serve in United Nations and

other multilateral peacekeeping operations abroad, including Somalia, Haiti, and the former Yugoslav republic

of Macedonia;

Whereas the United States is considering significantly expanding the deployment of United States military personnel as part of United Nations and other multilateral

peacekeeping forces;
2

•HCON 159 IH

Whereas serious concern has been raised about the deployment of United States military personnel as part of multilateral peacekeeping forces, particularly when such

forces are not under United States operational control,

because of the reduced ability of the United States to

protect the safety of such personnel, both in combat and

if captured;

Whereas on October 3 and 4, 1993, the forces of Somali warlord Mohamed Farah Aideed captured at least one American soldier serving in support of the United Nations

peacekeeping operation in Somalia and publicly committed horrible atrocities against members of the United

States Armed Forces;

Whereas it was reported that General Aideed planned to use

American prisoners as human shields in direct violation

of the 1949 Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War;

Whereas the Geneva Convention contains numerous protections for internationally recognized prisoners of war, including the right to prosecute those violating such protections; and

Whereas the Department of State and the United Nations

have declared that the protections of the Geneva Convention relevant to prisoners of war do not apply in the case

of American soldiers held prisoner in Somalia: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the President should ensure that any

3 member of the United States Armed Forces participating

4 in any United Nations or other multinational peacekeeping
3

•HCON 159 IH

1 operation shall have access to the full protection of the

2 Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners

3 of War of August 12, 1949, if taken captive and held

4 against his or her will by combatants or other parties to

5 a conflict.

Æ
| ☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |   |
|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| ☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |   |
|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Nevada                                                                   | 30-0796392                           |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization)            | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|                                                                     |                                 |
| 107 Atlantic Ave. , Suite 201Toronto, Ontario M6K1Y2                     |
| (Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code)        |
| (416) 767-8920(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)  |

| Large accelerated filer [  ]        |   | Accelerated filer [  ]             |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                          |   |                                         |
| Non-accelerated filer [  ]          |   | Smaller reporting company [ X ]    |
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |   |                                         |
|                                          |   | Emerging growth company [  ]  |

| Class                           | Outstanding as of April 21, 2017 |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Common stock, $0.0001 par value | 39,680,731                  |

----

----

|   Name                 | Position                              |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| Jack Robert Lee ("Rob Lee") | Chief Executive Officer, and Director |
| Steve Roberts               | President and Director                |
| Edward (Ted) Yew            | Secretary and Director                |
| Brian Morales               | Chief Financial Officer               |

----

|               |   |  ZOOMPASS HOLDINGS, INC.    |
|--------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|  May 25, 2017 |   |  By: /s/ Brian Morales           |
|               |   | Brian Morales Chief Financial Officer |
|               |   |                                  |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

ABILENE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 1:22-CR-026-H-BU

JOSE ADAN MONCADA-HERRERA

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Jose Adan Moncada-Herrera was originally charged with one count of illegal reentry 

following removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The government sought to detain 

Moncada pending trial, arguing that he posed a serious risk of flight given his immigration 

status. Dkt. No. 3. Per a standing order of this Court, the issue of detention was referred to 

Magistrate Judge John R. Parker for resolution. N.D. Tex. Special Order No. 3-251. Judge 

Parker held a hearing on the government’s motion to detain. Dkt. No. 11; see Dkt. No. 20

(transcript of detention hearing). Having considered the evidence and the parties’

arguments, Judge Parker concluded that the government had not met its burden to prove by 

a preponderance of the evidence that no combination of conditions could counteract the 

serious risk that the defendant would flee, so he denied the government’s motion to detain. 

Dkt. No. 18; see 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f). Judge Parker ordered that Moncada be released

pending trial.

The government immediately sought a stay of Judge Parker’s release order and 

appealed that decision to this Court. Dkt. Nos 16; 17; see 18 U.S.C. § 3145(a). The 

government contended that Moncada would be swiftly deported, preventing the government 

from prosecuting its case. Dkt. No. 16-1 at 3 (“ICE intends to begin deportation procedures 

Case 1:22-cr-00026-BU Document 40 Filed 05/13/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 134
– 2 –

immediately and anticipates that Moncada will be deported to Mexico as early as April 6, 

2022.”). The Court entered a stay (Dkt. No. 19) and was considering the parties’ briefs

(Dkt. Nos. 25; 28) when Moncada pleaded guilty to a superseding information charging him 

with improper entry by an alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325. Dkt. No. 31. This Court 

transferred (Dkt. No. 35) resolution of that charge—a Class B misdemeanor—to Judge 

Parker, who accepted Moncada’s guilty plea. Dkt. No. 36. 

In light of Moncada’s guilty plea, the government no longer bears the burden to 

show that Moncada should be detained. Instead, Moncada must now show by clear and 

convincing evidence that he is not likely to flee. 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1). Given that change, 

Judge Parker has vacated the release order (Dkt. No. 18) that forms the basis for the 

government’s appeal. Dkt. No. 39. This appeal is therefore moot. The government’s 

motion (Dkt. No. 25) is denied accordingly. The stay this Court entered pending resolution 

of this appeal is likewise dissolved as moot.

So ordered on May 13, 2022.

JAMES WESLEY HENDRIX

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cr-00026-BU Document 40 Filed 05/13/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 135
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND ON PAGES 1 THROUGH 3 OF THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER AND YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                             358
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    12392
<ALLOWANCES>                                       656
<INVENTORY>                                      72891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 85661
<PP&E>                                           10458
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   96169
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            69555
<BONDS>                                           3052
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                       23099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     96169
<SALES>                                         108244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                108244
<CGS>                                            96279
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    97279
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  7609
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2572
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2158
<INCOME-TAX>                                       848
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1310
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1310
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 166

Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to Taiwan’s membership

in the United Nations and other international organizations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 14, 1993

Mr. TORRICELLI (for himself, Mr. DEUTSCH, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. GEJDENSON,

and Mr. TAUZIN) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to Taiwan’s membership in the United Nations and other international organizations.

Whereas the Republic of China was one of the founding members of the United Nations in 1945;

Whereas at the end of the civil war in China in 1949 the

Kuomindang nationalists were defeated and moved their

Republic of China government to the island of Taiwan;

Whereas the governments in both Beijing and Taipei claim

that they represent all of China, including Taiwan;

Whereas on December 15, 1978, the United States and the

People’s Republic of China released a joint communique

that announced a switch in United States diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing;
2

•HCON 166 IH

Whereas that joint communique also stated that ‘‘the United

States will maintain cultural, commercial, and other unofficial relations with the people of Taiwan’’;

Whereas on December 15, 1978, in a unilateral statement released concurrently with that joint communique, the

United States stated that it ‘‘continues to have an interest in the peaceful resolution of the Taiwan issue’’;

Whereas on April 10, 1979, President Carter signed into law

the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8), effective as

of January 1, 1979, which created a domestic legal authority for the conduct of unofficial relations with Taiwan;

Whereas since January 1, 1979, the United States, in accordance with the Taiwan Relations Act, has continued the

sale of selected defense articles and defense services to

Taiwan;

Whereas in spite of its economic achievements and significant

role in the world economy and in world affairs, Taiwan

does not have representation in the United Nations or in

other international organizations;

Whereas the people of Taiwan have, through their elected legislators, expressed a strong desire to join the United Nations and other international organizations; and

Whereas the participation of the people on Taiwan in the

United Nations and in other international organizations

would further enhance the peace, security, and stability

in the Pacific and is in the best interests of the United

States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the
3

•HCON 166 IH

1 21,000,000 people on Taiwan should be represented in the

2 United Nations and in other international organizations.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3105 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3105

   To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to exempt from such Act 
animals accidentally included in shipments of aquatic species produced 
           in commercial aquaculture, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2013

 Mr. Crawford introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to exempt from such Act 
animals accidentally included in shipments of aquatic species produced 
           in commercial aquaculture, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Aquaculture Risk Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM LACEY ACT OF ANIMALS INADVERTENTLY INCLUDED IN 
              SHIPMENTS BY COMMERCIAL FISH FARMERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 2 of the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 (16 
U.S.C. 3371) is amended in paragraph (a)--
            (1) by striking ``The term'' and inserting ``(1) Except as 
        provided in subparagraph (B), the term''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) Such term does not include any animal accidentally 
        included in a shipment of an aquatic species produced in 
        commercial aquaculture for human consumption or for use for 
        recreational or ornamental purposes.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply 
beginning on the date of the issuance of final regulations under 
subsection (c).
    (c) Regulations.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through 
the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, shall issue regulations 
implementing the amendment made by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 228

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to violence against truckers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 21, 1994

Mr. BARCA of Wisconsin submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to violence

against truckers.

Whereas there are 8,000,000 workers in the trucking industry in the United States, some working for large carriers

and some for small carriers, some for private carriers and

some owner operators, all assisting the free flow commerce by transporting all types of commodities that

enter, leave, or move within this country;

Whereas unemployment, crime, and drug use have contributed to an increase of violence against commercial truckers, an increase that has gone unrecognized by the public

at large;

Whereas few State or local authorities report violent crimes

against truckers as such to the Federal Bureau of Inves-
2

•HCON 228 IH

tigation, statistics do not reflect this fast-growing and increasingly violent segment of crime;

Whereas the Federal Bureau of Investigation investigated

282 truck hijackings involving crimes of violence in 1993,

not including attempted crimes and crimes addressed by

State, county, and local authorities;

Whereas the Federal Government in large measure finances

the highway system the trucking industry uses, collecting

large sums in taxes from the industry, and licenses and

regulates the industry and its drivers, entailing a concomitant responsibility to protect them against crime;

and

Whereas Federal law provides protections to truckers in

among others, sections 33 and 1951 of title 18, United

States Code, but currently Federal prosecutions are not

undertaken unless certain monetary thresholds of loss are

met: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) when there is Federal jurisdiction, Federal

4 authorities should prosecute to the fullest extent of

5 the law murders, rapes, burglaries, kidnapings and

6 assaults committed against commercial truckers; and

7 (2) appropriate Federal agencies should ac8 knowledge this problem and place a priority on eval9 uation how best to prevent these crimes and appre10 hend those involved, and continue to coordinate their
3

•HCON 228 IH

1 activities with multi-jurisdictional authorities to

2 combat violent crimes committed against truckers.