alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) BERKADIA

 

 

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 (the“Reporting Period”)

** **

*CreditSuisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.,*

*Series2015-C1*

 

Pursuant to Section10.07 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the referencedtransaction (the “Servicing Agreement”), I hereby attest that:

 

     i.   A review of the activities and performance of Berkadia asSubservicer during the Reporting Period has been made under my supervision.

 

    ii.     To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, Berkadia as Subservicer has fulfilled, in all material respects, itsobligations under this Subservicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Periodand no default by the Subservicer under the Subservicing Agreement has occurredand is continuing.

 

 

Berkadia,

 

/s/ Mark E. McCool

Mark E. McCool

President

February 10, 2018

 

Inv. 144 Lib. N
## Summary of Interagency Working Comments on Draft Language under

EO 13563 and 12866 Interagency Review. Subject to Further Policy Review.

1 Interagency Comments on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s draft f inal r ulemaking, “ Regulation
of Fuels and Fuel Additives: 2013 Renewable Fuel Standards ,” RIN 2060

- AR43

1. The language that EPA has included regarding its intentions with respect to the 2014 RFS program year appear in several important respects may confuse the intended market signal. Because of the linkage across program years via RIN Banking, confusion regar ding the intentions being signaled for 2014 could have implications for RIN process during 2013 once the final rule is released. For this reason, it is critical tha t the text be accurate in conveying the signal that policymakers actually wish to convey.

a. At one point the proposed language suggests that the final rule for the 2014 RFS program year is unlikely to be completed before the end of June 2014, which would signal considerable uncertainty to anyone making compliance plans for both 2013 and 2014, given the linkage between program years due to RIN banking.

b. At another point, the draft discussion of problems with the 2014 statutory targets implies that a decision regarding the level of those targets will be based exclusively on the cap
between max imum supply capability for advanced fuels and the statutory target. As many participants noted on the call, EPA’s actual statutory authority to cut advanced and total targets up to the amount of any cut in the cellulosic target does NOT depend on a determ ination regarding the capability to produce additional amounts of non

- cellulosic advanced fuels, even though EPA has in previous years been using a supply

- based approach in justifying its decisions with regard to the advanced and total targets. Rather tha n signaling an intent to shift away from this approach for setting the 2014 RFS advanced and total targets, the draft final rule language seems to reinforce the notion that a focus on potential maximum supply of non

cellulosic advanced fuels is the appropr iate criterion for setting the targets.
#### DEACON v. DEACON.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 12, 1951.

A. E. Funk, Jr., Middlesboro, for appellant.

Sampson Knuckles, Barbourville, for ap-pellee..

CLAY, Commissioner.

In this action appellee was granted a divorce from appellant, her husband; was granted custody and control of two young children; and was awarded $150 a month for maintenance and support of the. children. The only question on this appeal is the reasonableness of this award in view of appellant’s income.

The proof does not show appellant owns any property. According to his testimony and that of his employer, he earns $200 a month as the manager of a tourist -court.

Prior to 1950 appellant leased this court arid operated it himself. It is the wife’s contention that he made substantially more than $200 a month under his lease, and she suggests that he gave up the business for the purpose of thwarting her claim for alimony and maintenance. She.attempts to estimate how much money he should be making at the present time.

The difficulty with the wife’s position is that she failed to furnish any proof that the husband had an income in excess of $200 a month at the time the judgment was entered. If she could prove he has a more substantial income, the allowance of $150 might well be reasonable.

In cases of this character an important element of consideration- is the husband’s ability to pay. See Triplett v. Triplett, 308 Ky. 516, 215 S.W.2d 116. While a wife and children may actually need the entire income of the divorced husband for their maintenance and support, he himself has to live in order to produce anything. From a practical standpoint the wife’s source of maintenance might be completely cut off by an oppressive monthly obligation imposed on her former husband.

Under the circumstances shown we believe the allowance should be reduced to $100 a month until such time as the wife is in a position to prove the husband can pay more- from a larger income.

. The judgment is reversed for consistent proceedings.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28703]



[[Page 67476]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Scientific Review and Evaluation Board for Health Services 
Research and Development Service, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, 
gives notice under Public Law 92-463, that a meeting of the Nursing 
Research Initiative Subcommittee of the Scientific Review and 
Evaluation Board for Health Services Research and Development Service 
will be held at the Washington Plaza Hotel, 10 Thomas Circle, NW, 
Washington, DC 20005, on March 6, 2001. On March 6, 2001, the meeting 
will convene from 8 a.m. until 5 p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to 
review research and development applications concerned with the 
measurement and evaluation of health care services and with testing new 
methods of health care delivery and management. Applications are 
reviewed for scientific and technical merit. Recommendations regarding 
funding are prepared for the Chief Research and Development Officer.
    This meeting will be open to the public at the start of the March 6 
session for approximately one-half hour to cover administrative matters 
and to discuss the general status of the program. The closed portion of 
the meeting involves discussion, examination, reference to, and oral 
review of staff and consultant critiques of research protocols and 
similar documents. During this portion of the meeting, discussion and 
recommendations will include qualifications of the personnel conducting 
the studies (the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy), as well as research 
information (the premature disclosure of which would be likely to 
frustrate significantly implementation of proposed agency action 
regarding such research projects). As provided by the subsection 10(d) 
of Pub. L. 92-463, as amended by Public Law 94-409, closing portions of 
these meetings is in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) and (9)(B).
    Those who plan to attend the open session should contact the Health 
Services Research and Development Assistant Director, Scientific Review 
(124F), Health Services Research and Development Service, Department of 
Veterans Affairs, 1400 I Street, NW, Suite 780, Washington, D.C., at 
least five days before the meeting. For further information, call (202) 
408-3665.

    Dated: November 1, 2000.

    By Direction of the Acting Secretary
Marvin R. Eason,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-28703 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1








STATEMENT OF BENNETT S. LEBOW,


CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF BORDERS GROUP, INC.


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I, Bennett S. LeBow, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 30, 2010, of Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Borders Group, Inc.








Date: December 9, 2010







\S\BENNETT S. LEBOW


Bennett S. LeBow


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Borders Group, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         447,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               32,939,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,335,000
<INVENTORY>                                 25,957,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            72,023,000
<PP&E>                                      58,327,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,531,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             149,691,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      195,677,000
<BONDS>                                    132,679,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (53,874,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               149,691,000
<SALES>                                     71,265,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            71,265,000
<CGS>                                       57,397,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               57,397,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,080,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,506,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,199,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,199,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (588,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,787,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)


</TABLE>
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 277

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the prerogatives of each

State for health care reform.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 4, 1994

Mr. HOEKSTRA (for himself, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. DORNAN, Mr.

GOODLING, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr.

SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr.

MCINNIS, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. UPTON, Mr. TORKILDSEN, and Mrs.

FOWLER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Ways and

Means

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the

prerogatives of each State for health care reform.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that, if

3 the Congress enacts legislation providing for a national

4 program for health care reform which would restrict the

5 freedom of any individual State in setting its own course

6 toward health care reform which is reflective of the unique

7 experience of such State, such legislation should provide

8 for the inclusion of such State only upon approval of the
2

•HCON 277 IH

1 inclusion of such State by a majority of the voters in such

2 State in a State referendum conducted on the issue of the

3 inclusion of such State.

Æ
### OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE December

3 , 2015 Randall S. Fiertz, Director Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence

A venue SW Washington

, D.C. 20591

3 9 6 0 ORANGE ST R EET

. S U ITE 5 00 RIV E R S ID E , CA 9250 !-3674 TEL E PH ONE

: 9 5 1 / 955 -6 300 FAX

: 951 /955
- 632 2 & 951 / 955-6363 SENT VIA U.S. MAIL AND FACSIMILE TO:

( 212) 267-5257 Re: Action Plan Pursuant to FAA Policy and Procedures Concerning Use of Airport Revenue (79 Fed

. Reg. 66282-01, November

7 , 2014) Dear Mr. Fiertz: This letter is in reference to the above referenced polic y on restrictions on the use of

" local taxes on aviation fuel (except taxes in effect on December 30 , 1987).

" T he County of Riverside has not imposed any general sales taxes on aviation fuel that were not in effect on December 30 , 1987 and therefore does not require an action plan. P l ease feel free to contact the undersigned should you have any questions. Sincerely, ACW:ay cc: Jeffrey VanWagenen

, Managing Director

, E DA Ivan Chand

, D e puty CEO Denise Harden

, Principal Management Analyst
Case 2:22-cv-00079-Z-BR Document 6 Filed 04/12/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 21
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: December 1, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: U.S. EPA Region 7 

SUBJECT: September 10, 2014, Meeting Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

 Speaker - Karl Brooks (8-10 minutes of remarks/5 minute Q&A)

 HHS attendees - The senior staff meets monthly at a meeting organized by the Office of the 

Regional Director. The following people attended (two by conference call) -

o Regional Director - Stephene Moore

o Administration for Children and Families - Nancy Thoma Groetken

o Administration for Community Living - Jim Varpness (by phone – Chicago office)

o Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services - Nan Foster-Reilly

o Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry - Dan Strausbaugh

o Food and Drug Administration - David Miser

o Health Resources & Services Administration - Lisa Goschen

o Information Technology Service Center - Oscar Cisneros (by phone – Denver office)

o Office for Civil Rights - Frank Campbell

o Office of the Assistance Secretary for Health - CAPT Jose Belardo

o Office of the General Council - Randy Butler

o Office of the Inspector General - Office of Evaluation & Inspection - Brian Whitley

o Program Support Center - Betty Klein

o Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration - Laura Howard

o Federal Occupational Health - CDR Daryl Perry

o Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response - CAPT Dana Hall

 Goals

o Provide a basic understanding of the Clean Power Plan

o Discuss the health effects associated with the Clean Power Plan and Climate Change

o Ask for their cooperation in promoting the climate change and health effects messages 

within their sphere of influence

o Ask for further cooperation with EPA programs involving health initiatives including 

Children’s Health, Asthma Awareness, air issues with endangered populations, and 

Environmental Justice communities.
o Leverage the strengths of both federal organization to make a more powerful impact in 

the communities in our four states.

EPA ATTENDEES –

 Karl Brooks, Regional Administrator, and Curtis Carey, Director of Public Affairs.
<PAGE>

                     32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund II,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kimberly A. Springsteen, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/     Kimberly A. Springsteen
-------------------------------

Kimberly A. Springsteen
Principal Financial Officer
May 16, 2005
-

-- 

_. 

SERVED FEBRUARY 24, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 


OFFICE OF HEARINGS 


WASHINGTON, DC 


IN THE MATTER OF 

FREEDOM AIRLINES INC. ' 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09SW0005 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

DMS FAA-2009-0980 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

Paragraph #2 ofthe Procedural Order is amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

... On or before May 1, 2010, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, 

but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. Ifthe parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely 

manner ... l 

Atta~hment - Service List 

I The court does not anticipate scheduling this case prior to 1 May 2010. 

1 
FAA Docket No. CP09SW0005 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COpy 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOOI 

ONE COpy 

Christopher Pappaioanou, Respondent's Counsel 

Director, Legal Affairs 

Mesa Air Group 

410 North 44th Street, Suite 700 

Phoenix, AZ 85008 

TEL: 602-685-4000 

FAX: 602-685-4350 

Annjenet Chennault, Complainant's Counsel 

·Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW -7E4, AC 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd. 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: 817-222-5071 

FAX: 817-222-5092/5946 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 

2WlOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### BUCK v. STATE.

No. 25491.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 21, 1951.

R. E. Murphey, Coleman, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for possessing liquor for the purpose of sale and assessed a fine of $250.00 and 60 days in jail.

The state relied upon evidence obtained from certain premises in the City of Coleman, which consisted of two pints of liquor together with what appears to be the mere drainage of two empty bottles, the exact amount of which is not given.

The sufficiency of the affidavit for search warrant and of the search warrant itself is questioned because of the uncertainty of the party alleged to be in charge of and having control of the premises. The language complained of being reflected in the affidavit by the following quotation: “ * * and being the premises occupied by, in charge of and under the control of James Buck, and/or party or parties whose name or names and whose description or descriptions are unknown to affiants.” The same language is found in the search warrant.

The question raised here is identical with that raised in Wood v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 243 S.W.2d 31. We there held that the language naming the person in charge and possession of the premises was uncertain because of the disjunctive language. The affidavit and search warrant in the instant case are, for the same reason, fatally defective.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-6899-3] 

                    Notice is hereby given that the National Environmental Education Advisory Council, established under Section 9 if the National Environmental Education Act of 1990 (the Act), is providing the public with an opportunity to provide written comments on the draft Report to Congress II. The purpose of this Report is to provide Congress with an assessment of the status of environmental education and to report effects of the Act. The draft Report to Congress II can be found on the Office of Environmental Education web site (                    *www.epa.gov/​enviroed*) until December 31, 2000. Paper copy is available by request only.                 

                    Members of the public are invited to submit written comments to Ginger Keho, Office of Environmental Education (1704A), Office of Communications, Education and Media Relations, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20460 or by e-mail at                     *keho.ginger@epa.gov.*                     Written comments will be accepted until December 31, 2000.                 

Dated: November 1, 2000. 

Ginger Keho, 

Designated Federal Official, Office of Environmental Education. 

[FR Doc. 00-28809 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-U