alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION 

Saving a National Treasure 

Robert Perciasepe, Acting Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Ariel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Mail code 1 101A 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

Via email and U.S. Mail: perciasepe.bob@eparnail.epa.gov

RE: Support for Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Standard/Low Sulfur Gasoline Rule 

Dear Administrator Perciasepe: 

Please accept this letter as a demonstration of our strong support for the Tier 3 standards that 

your agency has recently proposed. 

There is no doubt that the implementation of these new rules will produce substantial public 

health, environmental, and economic benefits to our country. They will substantially reduce 

heart and lung health impacts, especially for children, the elderly, and those with existing 

respiratory and cardiac problems. They will produce literally billions of dollars in health care 

savings, and allow us, as well, to continue to produce competitive motor vehicles. The Tier3/low 

sulfur gasoline program will lead directly to a regional reduction in emissions by tens of 

thousands of tons per year in nitrogen oxides, which would be of enormous benefit across the 

Chesapeake Bay watershed, since air pollution provides about a third of the nitrogen entering 

the Bay system. 

urge you to move surely and expeditiously in ultimately promulgating these new regulations. 

'(ou rsjincerely, 

rn Coble, Vice President 

Environmental Protection and Restoration

A^1^^^^

2013 APR 1 5 PM Z: 56

OFFiIiZ OFTHE

EXEiW'i'lVE SECFEi^IRHT

SIMON SIDAMONERISTOF1r 

CHAIR 

JANE P BA1TEN 

VICE CHAIR

ALAN B. GRIFFITH 

VICE CHAIR 

WILLIAM C. BAKER 

PRESIDENT 

FAN R. FIANCE 

TREASURER 

MARY TOO WINCHESTER 

SECRETARY 

TRUSTEES 

S. DECKER ANSTROM 

JOANNE S. BERKLEY 

W. RUSSELL G. BYERS, JR. 

D. KEITH CAMPBELL 

JOHN 1. CASTEEN III 

THOMAS M. DAVIS III 

AMANDA DEAVER 

RICHARD L. FRANVO 

G. WADDY GARRETI 

LAUREN GLEASON 

CAROLYN GROOBEY 

JANET F. VMS, M.D. 

ANN FRITZ HACKETT 

MICHAEL J. I-IANLEY 

ANNA JOHNSON 

ROBERTA. KINSLEY 

MATTHEWJ. KLEIN 

BURKS B. LAPIIAM 

HARRY 1. LESTER 

BYRON F M.ARCHANT 

H. TURNEY MCKNIGHT 

CHARLES W. MOORMAN 

W. TAYLOE MURPHY. JR. 

ARNOLD I. RICFIMAN 

ALEXIS Cl. SANT 

TRUMAN T. SEMANU 

ANNE B. SHUMADINE 

JENNIFER STANLEY 

BISHOP EUGENE TAYLOR SUTTON 

ANTHONY A. WILLIAMS 

SUSAN P WILMERDING 

PETER L. WOICKE 

ALAN L. WURTZEL 

HONORARY TRUSTEES 

DONALD F. BOESCH, Ph.D. 

LOUISA C. DUEMLING 

C.A. PORTER HOPKINS 

C GAYLON LAYFIELD III 

HF. INFEST 

M. LEE MARSUON 

WAYNE A. MILLS 

MARIE W. RIDDER 

JAMES E. ROGERS 

RUSSELL C. SCOIT 

THOMAS H. STONER 

AILEEN BOWDOIN TRAIN

PHILIP MERRILL ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER 6 HERNDON AVENUE ANNAPOLIS, MD 21403 


410/268-8816 FAX: 410/268-6687 CBF.ORG
Case 4:22-cr-00118-P Document 43 Filed 06/01/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 128
Case 4:22-cr-00118-P Document 43 Filed 06/01/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 129
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ROBERT HOPKINS, III,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,

Defendant.

No. 3:22-CV-00706-C

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CROSS-MOTION 

TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER

Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Future Deadlines and Defendant’s 

Cross-Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, Defendant’s Motion is hereby GRANTED. 

Specifically:

• The deadlines in this Court’s Scheduling Order, ECF No. 12, are hereby 

STAYED pending decision on Defendant’s forthcoming motion for 

summary judgment.

• Briefing on Plaintiff’s motion to compel, should he choose to file one, is 

hereby STAYED pending decision on Defendant’s forthcoming motion 

for summary judgment.

• All discovery and other proceedings in this matter are hereby STAYED 

pending decision on Defendant’s forthcoming motion for summary 

judgment.

• Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this matter shall be due by 

3:00 p.m. on Friday, August 11, 2023.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________ ____________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00706-C Document 17-1 Filed 05/24/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 397 Case 3:22-cv-00706-E Document 22-3 Filed 06/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 435
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

NO. 5:22-CR-034-04-H

RODRIGO GONZALES-GONZALES,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMEIVDATION

OF TTIE I,JNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days ol service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636(bxl), the undersigned Distria Judge is of the opinion that the Report and

Recommendafion of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

i-l

Dated November I ?,ZOZ2

JAMES SLEY HENDRIX

UNITE D TATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:22-cr-00034-H-BQ Document 550 Filed 11/17/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1649
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of THE HAVANA GROUP, INC. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, WILLIAM
L. MILLER, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date:  May 20, 2003                William L. Miller
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   William L. Miller, Chief Executive Officer
                                   And Chief Financial Officer
v

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COI.JRT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

STATE OF TEXAS

Plaintiff,

2:22-CY-094-Z

ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, €t al.,

Defendants.

NOTICE

Before the Court is the Parties' Jointly Proposed Briefing Schedule ("Briefing Schedule") (ECF

No. 122). Having reviewed the Briefing Schedule, the Court ADOPTS it in full.

Accordingly, (l) Defendants' Answer deadline is stayed pending the Court's adjudication of

Defendants' motion for reconsideration; (2) Plaintiff shall file its response to Defendants' motion for

reconsideration by April 2, 2024; (3) Defendants shall file any reply in support of their motion for

reconsideration by April 16, 2024; (4) Defendants shall file their Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint within

two weeks of the Court entering an order on the motion for reconsideration, in the event the Court does

not grant Defendants relief; and (5) within two weeks of the Court's entry of an order on Defendants'

motion for reconsideration, the parties shall confer and propose specific dates for filing the

administrative record and for a briefing schedule for their cross motions for summary judgment.

The Court issues notice accordingly.

March M 2oz4

MA J. KACSMARYK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:22-cv-00094-Z Document 124 Filed 03/18/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1643
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 133 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.133
                                    Agreed to September 30, 1993        
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That a collection of statements made in tribute to the late Justice 
Thurgood Marshall, together with related materials, shall be printed as 
a House document, with illustrations and suitable binding. The 
collection shall be prepared under the direction of the Joint Committee 
on Printing.
    Sec. 2. In addition to the usual number, there shall be printed the 
lesser of--
        (1) 50,000 copies (including 1,000 casebound copies) of the 
    document, of which 33,440 copies (including 440 casebound copies) 
    shall be for the use of the House of Representatives, 7,600 copies 
    (including 100 casebound copies) shall be for the use of the Senate, 
    and 8,960 copies (including 460 casebound copies) shall be for the 
    use of the Joint Committee on Printing; or
        (2) such number of copies of the document as does not exceed a 
    total production and printing cost of $66,988, with distribution to 
    be allocated in the same proportion as described in paragraph (1), 
    except that in no case shall the number of casebound copies be less 
    than one per Member of Congress.
Attest:







                                  Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:







                                                Secretary of the Senate.`
Exhibit 35.3












ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

COMM 2015-CCRE22

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of March 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank,
 National Association, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as
Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in
accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from March 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the “reporting period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator





BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2017
. . 

625 

OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTlN 

Eonormblo L. A. Wtir 

atrtr 8uprrl.ntrnaiult 0r l'ublio Irlrtnlot 

Aaatin, Tour 

Dmr 8irt Attmtlonr Mr. 

chid cmk urd 

Tooatlonel Did 

to end rr6m 

af Ur. 8. A. 

mr0t0t or ~-0 monoraior 

r; or dtrading the rbotr oontiolrtlon or thr Oonrral As9roprtitloa bill 0r thr Uth Lo6lrletPro 

brown en 84n8to Eill r27? 
. . 

Eoaoablr L. A. wooda, pego 9 

*2. Can the State Ls~lalaturr prrtent by It8 eote tha MO of Federel Funda 

eP9ro9rlatd by the Coagrraa or tha United 

Stetaa for e apaoffio purpose rhea this 

Fabrral mnay ia on drpoait ritb the State 

Treasurer?” 

If thr moaqa to br pei4 la dafreyllrg the Upm808 or the propo6sil trip8 to Oraund Rapida, mohigen, 

em to ba peid *uolualral~ tron rederel funda,r in tha 

au180 thet they ere aot to br peid bf warred dram on 

the Stat. Truaaurar of Tuna, t&a the proriaiona ooatelnad In Seaata Bill Ho. 07 paasad by the mowat madon oi thr Tuaa Laglsletwe oan bairo no brarlrqg thare0% 

If, howetrr, JOQ mean br your puratlon that 

tho r868rel aan~ys hem be~oa peld Into the State Treeaurr, then the -anewer to your rtret qusatlon la mmtrolled by the following prorlalon In the goner81 rider 

ts7t;e depertaantal appropriation bill (-to Bill. 

: 

‘Any such federal fund8 ea ae~ be 

drposite;d in the State Treasury end hareby eppropriatrd to the apaolfio purpoaa 

authorized by the iredrral Coterornt. a 

We 60 not hem before ue the aot,order or reguletlon purauent to which the mor+y to uhioh fou ref#r we8 dolirsred br the fadaral govsrnaaat. If the propoaed trip of 

t&ear three state mployeer may be reaaoaablr ooaatruod to 

b0 within auoh ~apcoiflo purpoaam, warrenta In pameat or 

theix trawling expeaere nay be propsrly dram by tha C-Ptroller l g a ia ethe t proper fund la the Stata lbXa8WY* 

w0 Pm8t uaolino to eaawcr your rrcond quartion 

for tha reeaon thst the easia ia hppothetioel. 

Youra Yuy truly
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LEON TRAVIS HURD, §

TDCJ No. 696480, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-cv-634-M

§

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a 

Recommendation in this case. An objection was filed by Petitioner, through which he 

clarifies that he is not seeking habeas relief as to his state convictions for possession 

with intent to deliver cocaine. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of 

the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to which objection was 

made, and reviewed the remaining proposed Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation for plain error. The Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, 

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge but elects to 

TRANSFER this case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit as 

to Petitioner’s aggravated assault conviction, to determine authorization to file a 

second or successive habeas application.

Because the Court is transferring this case to the Fifth Circuit, a certificate of 

appealability (COA) is not necessary. See United States v. Fulton, 780 F.3d 683, 688 

Case 3:22-cv-00634-M-BN Document 8 Filed 04/18/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 48
2

(5th Cir. 2015) (“[A] transfer order under 28 U.S.C. § 1631 is not a final order within 

the meaning of § 2253(c)(1)(B), and the appeal of such an order does not require a 

COA.”); Guel-Rivas v. Stephens, 599 F. App’x 175, 175 (5th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) 

(applying Fulton’s holding to transfer of a successive Section 2254 application).

SO ORDERED this 18th day of April, 2022.

Case 3:22-cv-00634-M-BN Document 8 Filed 04/18/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 49
Exhibit 35

SERVICERS ANNUAL CERTIFICATION

MECHANICS BANK

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 4.10 OF THE SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT

This Servicers Annual Certification is delivered pursuant to a sale
and servicing agreement dated as of March 1, 2015 (the Sale and Servicing Agreement) by and among, California Republic Auto Receivables Trust 2015-1, California Republic Funding, LLC, Mechanics Bank, as Seller, Servicer, Administrator,
Calculation Agent and Custodian (in such capacity, the Servicer), and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee (the Indenture Trustee). All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the
meaning assigned thereto in Appendix A to the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

The undersigned, a Responsible Officer of the Servicer,
hereby certifies that:

1.        A review of the activities of the Servicer and of the
performance of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement during the period from January 1, 2018 to and including December 31, 2018 (the Review Period) was conducted under my supervision.

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Review Period.

[SIGNATURE APPEARS ON NEXT PAGE]



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, in my capacity as specified below, has caused this
certificate to be executed as of the date indicated below.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 26, 2019 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Nathan J. Duda     
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Nathan J. Duda         
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAINA ANN HELEN GRUSH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 176 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of November, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1
<CURRENCY>                                   US$

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                              1
<CASH>                                       787,780
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                173,395
<ALLOWANCES>                                 25,000
<INVENTORY>                                  571,046
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,589,953
<PP&E>                                       925,056
<DEPRECIATION>                               676,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,842,449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        272,266
<BONDS>                                      180,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     26,515
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,363,668
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,842,449
<SALES>                                      900,107
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             935,123
<CGS>                                        709,186
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,294,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           20,425
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1,103,196)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1,088,605)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,088,605)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.41)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Power & Equipment Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, C.Dean
McLain, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





                                       /s/ C. Dean McLain
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Name: C. Dean McLain
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
                                       Date: December 9, 2003




         A signed original of the written statements required by Section 906 has
been provided to Western Power & Equipment Corp. and will be retained by Western
Power & Equipment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 227

Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to protecting the privacy

rights of Federal employees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 1994

Mr. DORNAN submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to

protecting the privacy rights of Federal employees.

Whereas executive branch departments and agencies have

been known to officially recognize, encourage, promote,

and fund homosexual events and homosexuality, both

male and female, without explicit congressional mandate;

and

Whereas that type of official recognition, encouragement, promotion, and funding, at taxpayer expense, is questionable, given that—

(1) homosexuality is not a fundamental constitutional right;
2

HCON 227 IH

(2) there is no clear evidence that persons are deprived of educational or economic opportunities by reason of their homosexuality; and

(3) equating homosexuality with race, color, or gender is highly offensive, particularly to many minority

group members and women who have had to struggle to

secure social opportunity and certain basic rights: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) executive branch departments and agencies

4 should not officially recognize, encourage, promote,

5 or fund homosexual events or homosexuality, directly

6 or indirectly, male or female, without explicit con7 gressional mandate;

8 (2) the Office of Personnel Management should

9 administer the civil service system in a way such

10 that quotas, minority status, affirmative action, and

11 other similar concepts do not apply with respect to

12 homosexuality or any claim thereof; and

13 (3) no person should be required to comply

14 with, participate in, or endorse any employee sen15 sitivity training or education relating to homosexual16 ity or cultural diversity, or other similar program, as
3

HCON 227 IH

1 a condition for appointment, job retention, or ad2 vancement in the Federal civil service.

Æ