alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.25

                        AMENDMENT TO ALLIANCE AGREEMENT -
                      PRODUCTION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
                                    SERVICES


THIS AMENDMENT to that certain Alliance Agreement -- Production Operations and
Maintenance Services, by and between Production Management Industries, a
Louisiana corporation ("PMI") and Energy Partners, Ltd., a Delaware corporation
("EPL"), dated June 4, 1998 (the "Agreement"), dated May 17, 2000, hereby amends
the Agreement to add the following provision:

18.0     DRUG TESTING

         It is understood that all of CONTRACTOR'S employees, agents,
         subcontractors and officers shall be subject to drug testing by
         OPERATOR during the performance of any work for OPERATOR, including but
         not limited to, periodic testing, random testing, reasonable cause
         testing and post accident testing. CONTRACTOR specifically agrees to
         comply with all OPERATOR and government regulations concerning drug
         testing and screening, and further assumes all responsibility for any
         failure to do so. CONTRACTOR certifies that it currently has in force a
         drug testing program that complies with government regulations and
         agrees to submit certified proof of compliance with government drug
         screening regulations on a periodic basis, not less than semi-annually.
         Entry onto OPERATOR'S premises constitutes consent to a search of the
         person and his/her personal effects, including without limitation,
         packages, briefcases, purses and lunch boxes. Refusal to cooperate will
         be cause for not allowing individual on OPERATOR's premises.

This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, with all counterparts taken
together having the same effect as if both parties had signed the same
instrument.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ENERGY PARTNERS, LTD.                  PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT
                                            INDUSTRIES

<S>                                   <C>
By: /s/ RICHARD A. BACHMANN            By: /s/ MICHAEL S. COFFULT
   -----------------------------           ----------------------------

Name:   Richard A. Bachmann            Name:   Michael S. Coffult
     ---------------------------             --------------------------

Title:  President                      Title:  V.P. Contract Ops
      --------------------------              -------------------------

Date:   5-17-00                        Date:   5-15-00
     ---------------------------             --------------------------
</TABLE>
H. Con. Res. 232 Agreed to March 24, 1994

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of

Thursday, March 24, 1994, it stand adjourned until noon on

Tuesday, April 12, 1994, or until noon on the second day after

Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this

concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the

Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Friday,

March 25, 1994, Saturday, March 26, 1994, Monday, March 28,

1994, Tuesday, March 29, 1994, Wednesday, March 30, 1994, or

Thursday, March 31, 1994, pursuant to a motion made by the

majority leader or his designee, in accordance with this resolution,

it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, April 11,

1994, or at such time on that day as may be specified by the

majority leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn,

or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to

reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

whichever occurs first.

SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority leader

of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the minority

leader of the House and the minority leader of the Senate, shall

notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively,
H. Con. Res. 232—2

to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
APRIL TERM, 1763.

Lib. D. D. No. 3. fol. 216.

#### Peregrine Brown’s Lessee *against*Nicholas Lynch.

EJECTMENT for a tract of land called *Broad Oak,*lying in *Kent*County.

At the trial of this cause the plaintiff, after deducing a regular title in the land in question to *Mary*and *Isabella*Hebburn, offered in evidence a deed of lease and release to the plaintiff in this cause, bearing date the 1st and 2d of May, 1759, acknowledged on the 2d day of *May,*and recorded on the 7th day of *May,*1759, in one of the recoré *219books of *Kent*County, upon the production of which deeds of lease and release, the defendant prayed the Court to direct the plaintiff to prove the execution of the said deeds; but the Court was of opinion that it was not necessary to to prove the execution of the deeds. To which opinion the defendant excepted.

Note. The act of 1715, c. 47. sect. 8. And the act of 1766, c. 14 -sect. 2.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 1, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-2478 Lower Tribunal No. 18-36161

________________ 

### Unisource Discovery, Inc., et al. ,

Appellants,
vs. 

### Steven Cerasale, et al. , Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles Johnson, Judge. Diego David Valdes, P.A., and Diego David Valdes, for appellants. Fowler White Burnett P.A., and Juan C. Zorrilla and Victor M. Velarde, for appellees. Before HENDON, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
#### LUGO v. STATE.

No. 25092.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 17, 1951.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of driving an automobile upon a public street within the City of Austin while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. A jury being waived, the court assessed his punishment at a fine of $50.

There are no bills of exception and no statement of facts in the record. All proceedings appear to be regular, therefore nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 232 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 232

            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1994

 Mr. Gephardt submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, March 
24, 1994, it stand adjourned until noon on Tuesday, April 12, 1994, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of 
business on Friday, March 25, 1994, Saturday, March 26, 1994, Monday, 
March 28, 1994, Tuesday, March 29, 1994, Wednesday, March 30, 1994, or 
Thursday, March 31, 1994, pursuant to a motion made by the majority 
leader or his designee, in accordance with this resolution, it stand 
recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, April 11, 1994, or at such 
time on that day as may be specified by the majority leader or his 
designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the minority leader of 
the House and the minority leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28636]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-383-013]


Dominion Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Tariff Filing

November 2, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 27, 2000, Dominion Transmission, Inc. 
(DTI) tendered for filing the following tariff sheets for disclosure of 
a recently negotiated transaction with PSEG Power New York, Inc.:

Second Revised Sheet No. 1300
First Revised Sheet No. 1405
Original Sheet No. 1406

    DTI requests an effective date of November 1, 2000, for the 
agreement.
    DTI states that the transaction includes a negotiated rate. 
Further, because the transaction includes a provision that may be a 
material deviation from the form of service agreement included in DTI's 
tariff, DTI has also filed the letter agreement between the parties.
    DTI states that copies of the filing have been served on all 
parties on the official service list, DTI's customers, and interested 
state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28636 Filed 11-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

ROBERT (BOB) ROSS, § 

§ 

Vv. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:22-CV-343-Y 

§ (Consolidated w/ 4:22-CV-430-Y) 

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL § 

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, et al., § 

§ 

EUGENIO VARGAS, § 

§ 

Vv. § 

§ 

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL § 

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, et al., § 

ORDER EXPEDITING BREIFING 

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Rules 30(d) and 37(b) Sanctions [doc. 

205]. Because of the impending dispositive motions deadline, the Court has determined that 

expedited briefing is appropriate. 

Based on the foregoing, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff Response be filed on or before 

Monday, February 26, 2024, and Plaintiffs’ Reply be filed on or before Friday, March 1, 2024. 

SIGNED February 20, 2024. ees et 

JEFFREY,b? 

ie 

CURETON 

UNITED SFATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 

é 

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 209 Filed 02/20/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 4874
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13

Pursuant to separate employment agreements between W-H Energy Services, Inc.
(the "Company") and each of the named executive officers set forth below, the
Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Company has the discretion, at the
beginning of each year, to increase, but not decrease, each such officer's
annual base salary above the annual base salary level provided in such
agreement. In addition, each such agreement provides for each such officer to
receive an incentive compensation bonus of up to 100% (or, in Mr. White's case,
200%) of such officer's annual base salary, the amount of such bonus, if any, to
be established in the sole discretion of the Board.

On January 17, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board recommended, and
the Board approved, 2006 annual base salaries, effective January 1, 2006, and
2005 cash bonus payments for such executive officers. In connection with
establishing base salaries and bonuses, the Compensation Committee conducted its
annual review of Mr. White's performance and, with Mr. White's assistance, the
performance of each such other officer. The Compensation Committee also received
a report from an independent compensation consulting firm that included a
comparison of the compensation paid to executive officers in the Company's peer
group. Based on such evaluation as well as the Company's operational and
financial performance, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board
approved, the 2006 base salaries and 2005 bonus payments set forth below:

-------
<TABLE>
<Caption>
Executive Officer                                                  2006 Annual Salary            2005 Cash Bonus
                                                                   ------------------            ---------------

<S>                                                                     <C>                          <C>
Kenneth T. White, Jr.
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer                         $475,000                     $900,000

William J. Thomas III
Vice President                                                          $360,000                     $340,000

Glen J. Ritter
Vice President                                                          $360,000                     $340,000

Jeffrey L. Tepera
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                              $300,000                     $260,000

Stuart J. Ford
Vice President and Intellectual Property Counsel                        $250,000                     $230,000

</Table>
Case 7:22-cr-00006-O Document 82 Filed 03/10/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 62
Case 7:22-cr-00006-O Document 82 Filed 03/10/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 63
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Power & Equipment Corp. &
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, C.Dean McLain, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                        /s/ C. Dean McLain
                                        ------------------------
                                        Name: C.Dean McLain
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        Date: March 14, 2006


     A signed original of the written statements required by Section 906 has
been provided to Western Power & Equipment Corp. & Subsidiary and will be
retained by Western Power & Equipment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors andManagement of

Prudential Asset Resources,Inc.:

 

We have examined management'sassertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance withApplicable Servicing Criteria, that Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for theCommercial Mortgage-Backed Security Transactions - RegAB Portfolio (the"Platform"), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i) (C) & (D),1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which theCompany has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by itwith respect to the Platform. Exhibit C to management's assertion identifiesthe individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by managementas constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company'scompliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express anopinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backedtransactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicingactivities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Companyprocessed those selected transactions and performed those selected activitiesin compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures werelimited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by theCompany during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company'scompliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management'sassertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicableservicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for thePlatform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 22, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,300 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017*

*T: (646) 471 3000, F: (646)471 8320, www.pwc.com/us*

* *
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 1, 2016

s0525

Order 

Clerk

June 1, 2016

153293 & (20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153293

COA: 329541

Kent CC: 00-012438-FH

JAMES ROSS WINRICK,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the January 13, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
Order filed April 7, 2022

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 22

- 00129

- CV

____________ WOLFE'S CARPET, TILE & REMODELING, LLC , Appellant

V.

GARY AND BEVERLY BOURELLE , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris C o unty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018

- 69479



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed March 31, 2022. Our review has determined
that relevant item s ha ve been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain :

• Notic e of Withdr awal of Non

- S uit filed March 3, 20 22

• Notice of S ubmission filed March 8, 2 022• Plaintiff ’ s Supple mental Re s ponse to Defendant’s Summary
Motion filed M a rch 18, 202 2

• Order on Motions for Modification, Correction and New Trial signed March 22, 2022

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s
record on or before April 18, 2022 , containing the abo ve listed items

. If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk ’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Spain.