alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Interior, Office of the Secretary.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission. Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463).

*Meeting Date and Time:*                        Friday, November 17, 2000, time 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Address:*                         Greater Wilkes-Barre Chamber of Business & Industry, 2 Public Square, Wilkes-Barre, PA 18710.                    

The agenda for the meeting will focus on implementation of the Management Action Plan for the Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor and State Heritage Park. The Commission was established to assist the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its political subdivisions in planning and implementing an integrated strategy for protecting and promoting cultural, historic and natural resources. The Commission reports to the Secretary of the Interior and to Congress.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission was established by Public Law 100-692, November 18, 1988 and extended through Public Law 105-355, November 13, 1998.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

C. Allen Sachse, Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission, 10 E. Church Street, Room A-208, Bethlehem, PA 18018, (610) 861-9345.

Dated: November 4, 2000.

C. Allen Sachse,

Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-28767  Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-PE-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28672]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 3449]

Renewal of the Overseas Schools Advisory Council

    The Department of State is renewing the Overseas Schools Advisory 
Council to provide a formal channel for regular consultation and advice 
from U.S. corporations and foundations regarding American-sponsored 
overseas schools. The Under Secretary for Management has determined 
that the committee is necessary and in the public interest.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration will appoint members of 
the committee. The committee will follow the procedures prescribed by 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Meetings will be open to the 
public unless a determination is made in accordance with the FACA 
Section 10(d) and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (1) and (4) that a meeting or a 
portion of the meeting should be closed to the public. Notice of each 
meeting will be provided in the Federal Register at least 15 days prior 
to the meeting date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Keith D. Miller, Executive 
Secretary of the committee at 202-261-8200.

    Dated: November 2, 2000.
Keith D. Miller,
Executive Secretary, Overseas Schools Advisory Council.
[FR Doc. 00-28672 Filed 11-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2
April 28, 2000



Mr. Thomas G. Plein and Diane L. Plein
Mr. Lee and Sandy Chesnut
Mr. Jeff and Linda Hurley
c/o Mr. Lee Chesnut
9267 Grossmont Summit Drive
La Mesa, CA 91941

RE: OPTION TO RENEW PER SECTION 39.3 OF THE LEASE DATED JUNE 26, 1995 BY AND
    BETWEEN THOMAS G. PLEIN AND DIANE L. PLEIN, HUSBAND AND WIFE OWNING THE
    PREMISES AS COMMUNITY PROPERTY AND CUBIC DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC. AND FURTHER
    ASSIGNED BY A LEASE ASSIGNMENT DATED JUNE 25, 1999 BY AND BETWEEN COHU,
    INC., ASSIGNEE AND CUBIC DEFENSE SYSTEMS, ASSIGNOR AND THOMAS G. AND DIANE
    L. PLEIN, COLLECTIVELY LESSOR.

Cohu hereby exercises their Option to Extend the term of the Lease for
additional five- (5) years, commencing November 1, 2000, and ending October 31,
2005. The Lease rate commencing November 1, 2000 shall be as defined in Exhibit
"C" of the original Lease.

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.

Truly yours,

CB RICHARD ELLIS, INC.

 /s/ Patrick A. Collins
-----------------------------------

Patrick A. Collins
Vice President
858.546.4624



 /s/ Charles A. Schwan
-----------------------------------

Charles A. Schwan
Chairman / CEO
Cohu, Inc.


              CB RICHARD ELLIS, INC. - LICENSED REAL ESTATE BROKER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information above has been obtained from sources believed reliable. While we
do not doubt its accuracy, we have not verified it and make no guarantee,
warranty or representation about it. It is your responsibility to independently
confirm its accuracy and completeness. Any projections, opinions, assumptions or
estimates used are for example only and do not represent the current or future
performance of the property. The value of this transaction to you depends on tax
and other factors which should be evaluated by your tax, financial and legal
advisors. You and your advisors should conduct a careful, independent
investigation of the property to determine to your satisfaction the suitability
of the property for your needs.
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Midwest (PADD 2) Natural Gas Consumed at Refineries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Midwest (PADD 2) Natural Gas Consumed at Refineries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         | 59,546  | 52,844  | 66,155  | 66,958  | 67,840 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 86,881  | 96,641  | 89,790  | 99,677  | 100,860 | NA      | 95,941  | NA      | 94,628  | 92,936 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 106,079 | 93,620  | 96,180  | 94,385  | 103,310 | 106,480 | 114,721 | 120,047 | 138,894 | 133,364
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 138,233 | 141,815 | 143,702 | 150,414 | 158,916 | 151,555 | 152,725 | 163,957 | 159,986 | 168,366
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 177,896 | 171,516 | 176,104 | 180,270 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 172 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 172

     To recognize the importance of promoting fair trade in wheat.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 28, 1993

 Mr. Johnson of South Dakota (for himself, Mr. Williams, Mr. Rose, Mr. 
    Sarpalius, Mr. Combest, Mr. Emerson, Mr. Allard, Mr. Minge, Mr. 
   LaRocco, Mr. Slattery, Mr. Glickman, Mr. English of Oklahoma, Mr. 
Inslee, and Mr. Pomeroy) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     To recognize the importance of promoting fair trade in wheat.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress recognizes the importance of promoting fair trade in 
wheat that--
    (1) Congress finds that--
            (A) Canadian wheat farmers enjoy an unfair advantage over 
        their American counterparts because of the secretive operation 
        of the Canadian Wheat Board and transportation subsidies;
            (B) in large part because of these subsidies, imports of 
        wheat from Canada have nearly tripled in the last five years 
        and now total 75 million bushels annually;
            (C) according to a Department of Agriculture study, these 
        imports have cost the United States Treasury some $600 million 
        over the last four years; and
            (D) the Canadians were able to capture as much as seventy-
        five percent of the Mexican wheat market in recent marketing 
        years; and
    (2) It is the sense of Congress that--
            (A) if the Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe 
        that wheat is being imported into the United States from Canada 
        under such conditions and in such quantities as to render or 
        tend to render ineffective, or materially interfere with, any 
        loan, purchase, or other program or operation undertaken by the 
        Department of Agriculture, then the United States Government 
        should take action to address the problem of Canadian wheat 
        imports using existing United States trade laws;
            (B) the United States Government should seek an immediate 
        understanding with the Mexican Government to define certain 
        Canadian wheat practices as unfair;
            (C) The United States, Canada, and Mexico should begin 
        immediate consultations with a goal of ensuring free and fair 
        trade in wheat throughout North America; and
            (D) Transportation subsidies and secretive monopolistic 
        pricing should be considered unfair trading practices.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATION     I, Monte E. Taylor, Jr. certify that:               a. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GeneLink, Inc.;               b. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;               c. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;               d. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:     2. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     3. [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238].     4. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     5. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and               a. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     6. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 

 
     7. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 13, 2007 By:  /s/ Monte E. Taylor, Jr.    Monte E. Taylor, Jr.,    Chief Executive Officer and Acting
<TABLE>

                        LIBERTY FINANCIAL COMPANIES, INC.

                EXHIBIT 12 - Statement re Computation of Ratios
                                ($ in millions)




<CAPTION>
                                                     Three Months Ended                                              
                                                          March 31
                                                     ------------------
                                                    1997           1996
                                                    ----           ----

<S>                                                <C>           <C>
Earnings:
   Pretax income                                   $51.8         $36.3
   Add fixed charges:
     Interest on indebtedness                        5.5           5.7
     Portion of rent representing
       the interest factor                           1.1           1.1
     Preferred stock dividends                       0.2           0.2
     Accretion to face value of redeemable
      convertible preferred stock                    0.2           0.2
                                                   -----        ------
     Income as adjusted                            $58.8         $43.5
                                                   =====        ======

Fixed charges:

   Interest on indebtedness                        $ 5.5        $  5.7
   Portion of rent representing
     the interest factor                             1.1           1.1
   Preferred stock dividends                         0.2           0.2
   Accretion to face value of redeemable
     convertible preferred stock                     0.2           0.2
                                                   -----        ------
   Total fixed charges                             $ 7.0        $  7.2                                                   
                                                   =====        ======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  8.40x         6.04x
                                                   =====        ======

</TABLE>
SERVED: DECEMBER 16, 2011 

,9Cf;ARTMt!\iroF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OK TIIANSPORTATION - ,;^..';''24^^0RTATjOlv 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS " '"^'^''^^ OPEPAllCHS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

• M ore iq A 9: lib 

FN THE MATTER OF 

EIBERTY JET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMSNO. FAA-2011-1004 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 201 lEAI 10025) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge.J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Dockei, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

•^-Riapnic A. Yoder' 

Chief Administrative-'Law Judgfe 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2011-1004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Altcnlion: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC~430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1OOO' 

. ONE COPY 

Kent S. Jackson, Respomieni^'s Counsel 

Jackson & Wade, L.L.C. 

21628 Midland Drive 

Shawnee, KS 66218 

TEL: 913-338-1700 

FAX: 913-338-1755 

Zachary M. Berman, Cutnplaiminl's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AEA-7 

Ixdcral Aviation Administration 

One Aviation Plaza, Room 561 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address; Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-^30. 

- 2 ^
June 25, 2015 

Mr. Reinaldo Gutierrez 

SkyDrone Services LLC. 

19164 N Hibiscus Street 

Weston, FL 33332 

Dear Mr. Gutierrez: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your June 16, exemption request on behalf of SkyDrone Services LLC into the 

public docket (No. FAA-2015-2163), but we are unable to process your request any further. 

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### ROEDLER v. STATE.

No. 25172.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 28, 1951.

No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Charged by complaint and information with the offense of unlawfully, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, operating á motor vehicle, appellant was convicted and assessed punishment at ten days in jail.

No bills of exception appear in the record.

The facts support the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Carrie B. Frorup, Deceased.*

Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County,

February 18, 1958.

*Harry A. Kornfeld*for Wilder M. Lahy, petitioner.

*Isidore Scheinberg*and *Saul Wolf*for Albert H. Lahy, copetitioner.

*Frarnk P. Nohowel, Stanley Fowler*and *Thomas B. Costello*for Clinton E. Lahy and others, respondents.

*Stephen Stavrides,*special guardian for unknown heirs in the estate of Louis E. Frorup, deceased.

*

 See Matter of Frorup, 10 Misc 2d 432.— [Rep.

*160Edgar F. Hazleton, S.

This is an application to vacate the decree admitting decedent’s will to probate, so as to permit the movants to file objections. The decree was entered on June 2, 1956.

All parties are of the mind that the application should not be decided upon the papers but that testimony should be taken. I agree.

The question presented is: Are the provisions of section 347 of the Civil Practice Act applicable to this hearing?

The language of said section gives the answer: *“*Upon the trial of an action or the hearing upon the merits of a special proceeding ’ ’. What is being conducted by this court is obviously not *“*the trial of an action ” nor is it “ the hearing upon the merits of a special proceeding ”. What I am considering is a special proceeding to vacate a decree, anent which proceeding testimony is being taken at this hearing to supplement the material in the papers submitted in the proceeding. Accordingly, the entire incident, in my opinion, constitutes one proceeding.

That section 347 is not applicable to an examination before trial appears to be the rule. *(Lemlich*v. *Lemlich,*266 App. Div. 748; *Matter of Tow,*93 N. Y. S. 2d 899.) However, upon a motion, the decisions without exception hold that the provisions of section 347 are applicable. *(Matter of Roberts,*235 App. Div. 378, 379; *Matter of Quant,*187 Misc. 142, 144; *Matter of Bray,*146 Misc. 415, 417.) A fortiori, section 347 must apply to a proceeding such as the one now before the court.