alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 290

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 20 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Received

SEPTEMBER 22 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending the President and the special delegation to

Haiti, and supporting the United States Armed Forces

in Haiti.

Whereas the special delegation sent to Haiti on September

17, 1994, has succeeded in convincing the de facto authorities in Haiti to agree to leave power;

Whereas on September 18, 1994, after an agreement was

reached in Port-au-Prince that day, the President ordered the present deployment of men and women of the

United States Armed Forces in and around Haiti; and

Whereas the Congress and the people of the United States

have great pride in the men and women of the United

States Armed Force and fully support them in all their

efforts overseas, including those in Haiti: Now, therefore,

be it
2

HCON 290 RFS

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) commends the efforts of the President in

4 sending former President Jimmy Carter, retired

5 General Colin Powell and Senator Sam Nunn to

6 Haiti in an effort to avoid the loss of American lives;

7 (2) fully supports the men and women of the

8 United States Armed Forces who are carrying out

9 their mission in Haiti with professional excellence

10 and dedicated patriotism;

11 (3) supports the efforts of the President,

12 through the special delegation, to provide for the de13 parture from power of the de facto authorities and

14 the return of democracy and the rule of law in Haiti;

15 (4) affirms the commitment to national rec16 onciliation and adherence to the rule of law in Haiti;

17 and

18 (5) supports an orderly withdrawal of all

19 United States Armed Forces as soon as possible.

Passed the House of Representatives September 19,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                         Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp
                         -------------------------------



          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, each hereby
certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of their knowledge:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



                                         By:  /s/  Harold K. Fletcher
                                            ---------------------------------
                                                   Harold K. Fletcher
                                                   CEO

                                              /s/  Joseph P. Macaluso
                                            ---------------------------------
                                                   Joseph P. Macaluso
                                                   Principal Accounting Officer

                                            November 13, 2006

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp and will be retained by
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### COY v. STATE.

No. 26310.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 11, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

William H. Scott, Criminal Dist. Atty., King C. Haynie, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., Houston, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
**Exhibit 35.2**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

 

I, Michael J. Mack, Jr., President of Deere Credit Services, Inc., certify:

 

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period from March 11, 2015 (the date of issuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2015 transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through October 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 11, 2015 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2015 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 
| Date: January 15,   2016 | Deere Credit   Services, Inc. |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                          |                               |
|                          |                               |
|                          |                               |
|                          |                               |
|                          | By                                 | */s/   Michael J. Mack, Jr.* |   |
|                          |                               | Michael J.   Mack, Jr. |
|                          |                               | President |

 

----
<PAGE> 1                                                 EXHIBIT 11.

MUSTANG SOFTWARE, INC.

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(In thousands, except earnings per share) (Unaudited)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>

                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                            March 31,
                                                        2000       1999
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>       <C>
Weighted average common shares calculation - basic
 Weighted average number of common shares and common
 stock units outstanding                                 6,315     4,145
Common stock equivlents from outstanding stock options       0         0
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average common and common stock equivalents outstanding  6,315     4,145
===============================================================================
Weighted average common and common equivalent share
 calculation - diluted:
Weighted average number of common shares and common
 stocks units outstanding                                6,315     4,145
Dilutive effect of outstanding common stock options         	        388
Assuming conversion of Preferred Stock                               451
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares -
 diluted                                                 6,315     4,984
===============================================================================

Net Income (Loss)                                        $(245)    $  10
===============================================================================
Net Earnings per share - Basic                           $(.04)    $ .00
===============================================================================
Net Earnings per share - Diluted                         $(.04)    $ .00  (1)
</TABLE>

(1) Fully diluted earnings per share have not been presented because the effects
are not material.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2018

a0523 

# Order

Clerk May 30, 2018

156308

JOJUAN DYSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 156308

COA: 331256

Wayne CC: 15

- 001136

- NI

CITY OF DETROIT,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

GREGORY COTTON

, Defendant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 18, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, be cause we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>   1
                                                               EXHIBIT 10.1

                  FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
                    NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN
                             OF LANDAIR CORPORATION


Landair Corporation, a Tennessee corporation (the "Company"), hereby amends its
Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"),
subject to shareholder approval as provided below:

         1.       The first sentence of Section 5(a) of the Plan is hereby
                  amended to read as follows in its entirety:

                  "Options to purchase up to Two Hundred Fifty Thousand
                  (250,000) shares of Common Stock may be granted hereunder."

         2.       This Amendment shall be effective upon its approval by the
                  Company's shareholders.
|  Definitions, Sources and Explanatory Notes |
|--------------------------------------------------|
|  Category:   | Petroleum Refining & Processing                       |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                             |
|  Topic:      | Natural Gas Used as Feedstock for Hydrogen Production |
|                         |
|-------------------------|
|   Definitions |  |
|                         |
| Key Terms                                            | Definition                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Hydrogen                                             | The lightest of all gases, occurring chiefly in combination with oxygen in water; exists also in acids, bases, alcohols, petroleum, and other hydrocarbons.                                                                                                                                                               |
| Natural Gas                                          | A gaseous mixture of hydrocarbon compounds, the primary one being methane.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| Petroleum Administration for Defense (PAD) Districts | Geographic aggregations of the 50 States and the District of Columbia into five districts by the Petroleum Administration for Defense in 1950. These districts were originally defined during World War II for purposes of administering oil allocation. Description and maps of PAD Districts and Refining Districts. |
|                                                                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| For definitions of related energy terms, refer to the   EIA Energy Glossary. |
|  	Sources |
|-----------------|
|  |
|--|
|  | Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-820,"Annual Refinery Report".
EIA Forms & Instructions
.
Background, Survey Methodology and Statistical Details
. |
|                           |
|---------------------------|
|  	Explanatory Notes |
|                           |
|  | Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding. |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
[BORDER IS AROUND STOCK CERTIFICATE]

                         INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF
                                     NEVADA

No. XXXX          Shares -- XXXX

                          MOBILE DESIGN CONCEPTS, INC.

                  Authorized: 50,000,000 Shares of Common Stock

     This Certifies that XXXXX SPECIMEN XXXXXXXX is the owner of
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Shares of the Capital Stock of
                          Mobile Design Concepts, Inc.
transferable only on the Books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by duly authorized Attorney on surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed.

In Witness Whereof, the duly authorized officers of the Corporation have
hereunto subscribed their names and caused the Corporate Seal to be hereto
affixed at Salt Lake City, Utah
This XXXXXXXXXXXXXX day of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, A.D. WWWW

     Steven N. Bednarik              Steven N. Bednarik
     President                       Secretary

                      Shares          $0.001          Each
                                    Par Value

                          [Reverse Side of Certificate]
                         [BORDER IS AROUND CERTIFICATE]

                                   CERTIFICATE
                                       FOR
                                      XXXX
                                     SHARES
                                     OF THE
                                  Capital Stock
                          Mobile Design Concepts, Inc.
                                    ISSUED TO
                            XXXXXXX SPECIMEN XXXXXXX
                                      DATED
                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXX

     For Value Received, XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX hereby sell, assign
and transfer unto XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX shares
of the Capital Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
to transfer the said Stock on the books of the within named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises.

     Dated XXXXXXXXX
     In Presence of

     XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX                    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28872]



[[Page 67791]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Environmental Impact Statement; Manatee County, FL

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that an 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared for a proposed 
highway project in Manatee County, Florida.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Donald Davis, Program Operations 
Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, 227 North Bronough Street, 
Suite 2015, Tallahassee, Florida 32301, Telephone: (850) 942-9650, 
Extension 3031.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the Florida 
Department of Transportation will prepare an EIS for a proposal to 
improve the north-south circulation between I-75 and Rye Road (CR 675). 
Part of this proposal is to evaluate increased vehicular capacity 
crossing the Manatee River. Improvements to the corridor are considered 
necessary to provide for projected traffic demand.
    Alternatives under consideration include (1) taking no action; (2) 
widening mainline I-75 and the I-75 crossing of the River; (3) widening 
Rye Road; and (4) a new crossing of the Manatee River connecting a 
widened Fort Hamer Road to the north with a widened Upper Manatee River 
Road to the south.
    Letters describing the proposed action and soliciting comments will 
be sent to appropriate Federal, state, and local agencies, and to 
private organizations and citizens who have expressed interest in this 
proposal. A series of public meetings will be held in Manatee County, 
Florida between October 2000 and September 2001. In addition a public 
hearing will be held. Public notice will be given of the time and place 
of the meetings and hearing. The Draft EIS (DEIS) will be made 
available for public and organizations reviews and comments prior to 
the public hearing. Per 40 CFR 1507.1, a scoping process will be 
developed as part of the project and a formal scoping meeting will be 
held.
    To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed 
action are addressed and all significant issues identified, comments 
and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments or 
questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be 
directed to the FHWA at the address provided above.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Research, Planning and Construction. The regulations 
implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding inter-governmental 
consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this 
program.)

    Issued on: November 1, 2000.
Donald Davis,
Program Operations Engineer, Tallahassee, Florida.
[FR Doc. 00-28872 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 304 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 304

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 3 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Directed the Secretary of the Senate to make corrections in the 
                    enrollment of the bill S. 1312.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (S. 1312) to amend the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 in order to provide for the 
availability of remedies for certain former pension plan participants 
and beneficiaries, the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following 
corrections:
            (1) In section 1, strike ``1993'' and insert ``1994''.
            (2) In section 2(1), strike ``paragraph (5)'' and insert 
        ``paragraph (7)''.
            (3) In section 2(2), strike ``paragraph (6)'' and insert 
        ``paragraph (8)''.
            (4) In section 2(3), in the new paragraph (7) to be added 
        thereby, strike ``(7)'' and insert ``(9)''.
            (5) In section 3, strike ``subsection (a)(7)'' and insert 
        ``subsection (a)(9)''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 3, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Case 1:22-cr-00024-H-BU   Document 108   Filed 06/02/23    Page 1 of 1   PageID 432
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Texas Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Texas Refinery Alkylates Production Capacity as of January 1 (Barrels per Stream Day)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 266,600 | 255,300 | 258,500 | 253,975 | 252,300 | 270,700 | 267,000 | 269,000
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 281,150 | 296,650 | 310,250 | 303,750 | 311,450 | 320,850 | NA      | 318,600 | NA      | 328,500
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 329,700 | 338,500 | 335,900 | 342,050 | 344,550 | 347,750 | 349,383 | 333,950 | 369,850 | 372,750
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 366,050 | 367,650 | 368,650 | 371,250 | 372,750 | 375,350 | 378,350 | 383,350 | 385,950 | 391,250
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 411,071 | 414,071 | 420,833 | 416,393 | 416,393 |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025