alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28781]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development 
(#1199).
    Date and Time: December 7-8, 2000 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
380, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Victor Santiago, Program Director, Human 
Resource Development Division, Room 815, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: 
(703) 292-4673.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the Historically Black Colleges 
and Universities proposals as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: November 6, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-28781 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### DORSEY v. STATE.

No. 25166.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 21, 1951.

Rehearing Denied April 11, 1951.

No attorney, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

. MORRISON, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for the offense of forgery, with a sentence of two-years in the penitentiary.

Appellant pleaded guilty before the court, having waived his right to trial by jury. The court heard the evidence' and found him guilty. The proceedings appear .to be regular and nothing is presented for review by this Court, there being no statement of facts or bill of exception in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 308 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 308

Concerning the removal of Russian troops from the independent nation of 
                                Moldova.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 1994

Mr. Hoyer (for himself and Mr. Wolf) submitted the following concurrent 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Concerning the removal of Russian troops from the independent nation of 
                                Moldova.

Whereas units of the armed forces of the Russian Federation continue to be 
        deployed on the territory of the sovereign and independent nation of 
        Moldova, against the wishes of the people and the Government of Moldova;
Whereas the continued stationing of military forces by Russia on the territory 
        of the independent and sovereign nation of Moldova without permission of 
        the Moldovan Government is contrary to international law;
Whereas the Parliamentary Assembly of the Conference on Security and Cooperation 
        in Europe passed a resolution on July 6, 1994, calling for a ``most 
        rapid, continuing, unconditional, and full withdrawal'' of the 14th Army 
        of the Russian Federation, and the Conference on Security and 
        Cooperation in Europe diplomatic mission in Moldova has called for the 
        accelerated withdrawal of the 14th Army;
Whereas on August 10, 1994, negotiators of the Moldovan and Russian Governments 
        initialed an agreement according to which Russia will withdraw its 
        military forces from Moldova in three years; and
Whereas the Russian Minister of Defense has called for further drafting of the 
        withdrawal agreement, and the commander of the 14th Army has publicly 
        rejected the terms of the agreement: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That
            (1) the United States Congress calls upon the Government of 
        the Russian Federation to adhere to the provisions of the 
        withdrawal agreement initialed on August 10, 1994; and
            (2) urges the administration to continue to use every 
        appropriate opportunity, including multilateral and bilateral 
        diplomacy, to secure removal of Russian military forces from 
        Moldova.
                                 <all>
```
#### HALL v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 6, 1952.

W. G. Kenton, Maysville, for appellant. J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., John B. Browning, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*738PER CURIAM.

Motion- for an appeal from the Mason Circuit Court. Judgment of conviction for unlawfully and knowingly receiving stolen property. Six months in jail. There is no transcript of evidence in the record. Therefore, the only question before us is whether or not the indictment supported the verdict. Spencer v. Commonwealth, 250 Ky. 370, 63 S.W.2d 288. Appellant does not attack the sufficiency of the indictment and an examination of it reveals that it complies with the Statute. KRS 433.290.

Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66754-66755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28604]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:30 a.m. on 
Tuesday, November 7, 2000, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's 
Board of Directors will meet in closed session, pursuant to sections 
552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8),

[[Page 66755]]

(c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of Title 5, United States Code, 
to consider matters relating to the Corporation's receivership and 
supervisory activities.
    The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550--17th Street, NW., Washington, DC
    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at (202) 898-6757.

    Dated: November 3, 2000.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28604 Filed 11-3-00; 11:21 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
#### Cardwell, Appellee, *v.*Harris, Appellant.

(No. 28280

Decided October 9, 1940.)

*Mr. Joseph F. Smith,*for appellee.

*Mr. Sydney A, Eisenberg,*for appellant.

*324It is ordered and adjudged, *sua sponte,*that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

"Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, William’s, Matthias, Hart and Turner, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.5

                             ACUPAC PACKAGING, INC.
                         FIXED CHARGE RATIO COMPUTATION
                                (GUARANTORS ONLY)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 2, 1999 TO
                                                                  DECEMBER 31, 1999
                                                           ------------------------------
                                                               (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                                        <C>
Income (loss) before taxes ..............................           $    931
Fixed charges reflected in income (loss) before taxes
   Interest expense .....................................                  3
   One third of rental expenses .........................                 62
                                                                    --------
Total fixed charges .....................................                 65
                                                                    --------


Income (loss) before taxes plus fixed charges above .....           $    996
                                                                    ========
Fixed charge ratio ......................................             15.32x
</TABLE>
#### GRANT COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BASTON et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 10, 1952.

*881Raymond R. Vincent, Williamstown, E. H. Walton, Covington, for appellants.

Stoll, Keenon & Park, .Lexington, for. appellees.

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

This is a suit on an injunction bond. The Grant County Board of Education is appealing from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to its petition.

The appellees, citizens of Grant County, filed an action against the Board of Education (1) to compel it to construct a school building on a site originally selected by the Board for that purpose; (2) to prevent the Board from conveying the property; and (3) to restrain the Board from constructing the school building on any other site. In that action the appellees obtained a temporary restraining order against the Board and executed an injunction bond. In the final determination of that cause the Board was successful. The Board then filed this suit to recover a $500 attorney’s fee which it had expended in dissolving the temporary restraining order.'

The law applicable to the question before us is stated in Strong v. Duff, 243 Ky. 469, 48 S.W.2d 1074. We said it is well established that, where injunctive .relief is the sole relief sought, and is not merely ancillary to some other relief, attorney’s fees m.ay not be recovered as damages in an action on an injunction bond; however, if the injunctive relief sought is ancillary, a recovery, may be had on the bond for reasonable attorney’s fees for services rendered in dissolving the injunction.

We think the chancellor disposed of the case properly, because the only relief sought by the appellees in the original action was injunctive relief.

Judgment affirmed.
Case 5:22-cr-00034-H-BV Document 439 Filed 09/06/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1156
Case 5:22-cr-00034-H-BV Document 439 Filed 09/06/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1157
1

The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, Chief Judge, United States District

Court for the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-3988

___________

Richard J. Wollenberg, III, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

John E. Potter, Postmaster General, *

United States Postal Service, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: March 7, 2008

 Filed: March 17, 2008

___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Richard J. Wollenberg, III, appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of

summary judgment in his Title VII discrimination action. After reviewing the record

de novo, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from it in a light most

favorable to Wollenberg, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.

2002) (standard of review), we conclude summary judgment was proper for the

reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 19, 2014

s0916 

# Order

Clerk September 19, 2014

149799 & (11)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE O F MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149799

COA: 322478

Oakland CC: 14

- 249527

- FH

TAMMY SUE RICHARDS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the forthcoming regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board).

# DATE AND TIME:

The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on November 9, 2000, from 9:00 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kelly Mikel Williams, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4025, TDD (703) 883-4444.

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Parts of this meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available), and parts of this meeting will be closed to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:                           ( print page 66752)    

## Open Session

### 1. Approval of Minutes

#### October 12, 2000 (Open and Closed)

### 2. Report

#### Report on Corporate Approvals

### 3. New Business

### A. Other

## Corporate and Chartering Approvals

### B. ACA Restructures

#### AgChoice Farm Credit, ACA

#### Carolina Farm Credit, ACA

#### Central Kentucky Agricultural Credit Association

#### Farm Credit of Southwest Florida, ACA

##                     Closed Session[*] 

### 4. Report

#### OSMO Report

Dated: November 2, 2000.

Kelly Mikel Williams,

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.

# Footnotes

*.                             Session Closed—Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-28644 Filed 11-3-00; 2:22 pm]

BILLING CODE 6705-02-M
Case 4:22-cr-00095-P Document 32 Filed 04/13/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 71
Case 4:22-cr-00095-P Document 32 Filed 04/13/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 72
Exhibit 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES



|                  |  |                                     
|----------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Country or Region |  | Official Name                       
|Australia         |  | Turnstone Australia Pty. Ltd.       
|Brazil            |  | Turnstone do Brasil Ltda.           
|Cayman Islands    |  | Turnstone Systems International Ltd.
|Delaware          |  | Turnstone Holdings LLC              
|France            |  | Turnstone Systems SARL              
|Germany           |  | Turnstone Systems GmbH              
|Hong Kong         |  | Turnstone Hong Kong Ltd.            
|Singapore         |  | Turnstone Singapore Ltd.            
|United Kingdom    |  | Turnstone International (UK) Limited
FILED

March 3, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

SOUTHLAND REALTORS, INC., ) KNOX CIRCUIT

)

Plaintiff/Appellee ) NO. 03A01-9710-CV-00455

)

v. ) HON. HAROLD WIMBERLY

) JUDGE

TABOR CONSTRUCTION )

COMPANY, INC., )

)

Defendant/Appellant ) AFFIRMED

Thomas R. Henley, Knoxville, for Appellant.

C. Paul Harrison, Knoxville, for Appellee.

O P I N I O N

INMAN, Senior Judge

The trial court allowed the plaintiff a recovery of a commission for the

sale of real estate. The defendant appeals, insisting that (1) the plaintiff was

not a party to the sales agency contract and thus had no standing to file this

action, (2) the agency contract expired before performance, (3) the plaintiff

“performed no useful work,” and (4) the record “cannot support a judgment

for anyone.” Each of these issues alleges that the trial court erred in failing to

grant summary judgment.

The record does not reveal whether the motion was brought to the

attention of the trial judge, but in the interest of the disposition of the case we

may assume it was overruled since the case was tried on the merits. This
brings us to a critical difficulty, that being the absence of a transcript or

statement of the evidence.

A review of the propounded issues is precluded because of the absence

of a transcript of the testimony. We cannot decide the issues solely on the

basis of the technical record. Sherrod v. Wix, 849 S.W.2d 780 (Tenn. App.

1992).

In avoidance of this elementary principle, the appellant argues that his

appeal is from the refusal to grant summary judgment, as contrasted to an

appeal from an adverse judgment following a trial on the merits. Aside from

the fact that the motion was not supported as RULE 56 requires, Byrd v. Hall,

847 S.W.2d 208 (Tenn. 1993), as a general rule the overruling of the motion

was interlocutory and hence not appealable. See, Williamson County

Broadcasting Co. V. Williamson County Bd. Of Education, 549 S.W.2d 371

(Tenn. 1977). 

The judgment is affirmed at the costs of the appellant.

____________________________

William H. Inman, Senior Judge

CONCUR:

_______________________________

Herschel P. Franks, Judge

_______________________________

Don T. McMurray, Judge
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28863]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Renewal of the Planning and Steering Advisory Committee (Navy)

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Planning and Steering Advisory Committee (PSAC) has been 
renewed in consonance with the public interest, and in accordance with 
the provisions of Public Law 92-463, the ``Federal Advisory Committee 
Act.''
    The PSAC provides an avenue of communications by which a 
distinguished group representing scientific, academic engineering, and 
intelligence communities advises the Chief of Naval Operations on 
questions related to SSBN Security. Their mission is to make in-depth 
technical assessments of U.S. and foreign threat ASW developments and 
related technologies, to critically review programs which potentially 
impact SSBN survivability, and to evaluate intelligence efforts to 
identify and define ASW and SSBN survivability threats.
    The Committee will continue to be composed of selected Group 
members to conduct detailed examinations of matters related to SSBN 
security.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact Laura Wurzer, 
telephone: 301-693-0934.

    Dated: November 6, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-28863 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of iPass Inc. (the "Company") of Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald C. McCauley, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:    March 30, 2004             /s/  Donald C. McCauley

                                         Donald C. McCauley
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         (Principal Financial Officer)

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of iPass Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before
or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 18, 2021

Order 

Clerk

August 18, 2021

163072(66)

PETERSEN FINANCIAL, LLC, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

SC: 163072

v COA: 350208

Kent CC: 16-011820-CH

CITY OF KENTWOOD,

Defendant-Appellant

and

KENT COUNTY TREASURER,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Municipal League and the 

Government Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan to file a reply to plaintiff-appellee’s 

response to its brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The reply submitted on August 12, 2021, 

is accepted for filing.