alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Montana Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Montana Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 6      | 6      | 6      | 6      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 4     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | NA     | 4      | NA     | 4     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
December 3, 2015

Dear Mr. Camp:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-3501). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 12/17/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/S/ Program Analyst
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for COMM 2015-CCRE23 Commercial Mortgage  Pass-ThroughCertificates

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

/s/ Jeffrey Coletta

Jeffrey Coletta

Assistant Secretary

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JOEL NOONKESTER, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00223-O

 § 

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT §

HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., § (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 

§ 4:21-cv-00700-O)

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for 

review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Motion for an Order Requiring Capital Management 

Holdings, LLC to Show Cause Why It Should Not be Held in Contempt for Failing to Comply 

with the Court’s Order of April 28, 2022 (ECF No. 61 in Civil Action No. 4:21-cv-00700-O) is

DENIED.

SO ORDERED on this 26th day of September, 2024.

_____________________________________

Reed O’Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00223-O Document 92 Filed 09/26/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1423
6:30 AM – 6:40 AM

6:45 AM – 8:00 AM Hold

8:00 AM – 8:30 AM

8:30 AM – 12:00 PM

9:00 AM – 9:10 AM Daily WH Senior Staff

9:00 AM – 9:30 AM Daily Markets Update

12:00 PM – 12:35 PM

At 12:32 PM

At 1:00 PM

8:00 PM – 8:10 PM

8:10 PM – 8:50 PM

8:50 PM – 9:00 PM

Sat, Jun 24

10:00 AM – 10:15 AM White House Weekend Senior Staff

Sun, Jun 25

Before 12:30 AM

(b) (6) (b) (6)

(b) (6)

(b) (6)

(b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6)

(b) (6)
(logo) Grant Thornton **Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm** Board of DirectorsTrimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC Audit • Tax • Advisory Grant Thornton LLP1201 Walnut Street, Suite 2200Kansas City, MO 64106 T 816.412.2400F 816.412.2404www.GrantThornton.com  We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC (formerly known as Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.)(the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Company’s Operating or Trust Advisor Services (the “Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, excluding criteria which management has determined are not applicable in Exhibit A. The Platform consists of asset-backed transactions and securities for which the Company acted as operating or trust advisor and as defined by management in Exhibit B of Management’s Report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.  /s/ Grant Thornton LLPKansas City, MOFebruary 29, 2016
Exhibit 12(a)(1)  CERTIFICATION  I, Jairo Senise, certify
that:  1.  I have reviewed
this annual report on Form 20-F of Gruma, S.A. de C.V.;  2.  Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;  4.  The companys
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:  a.  designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;  b.  evaluated the effectiveness of the companys
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c.  disclosed in this report any change in the
companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.  The companys
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys
auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  a.  all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.  any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys
internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Jairo SeniseName:
  Jairo SeniseTitle:
  Chief Executive Officer
   Date: June 30, 2006  1
Exhibit 10.21
                                   Amendment 1

      This amendment is made as of June 6, 2000 to the shareholders agreement of
December 31, 2000 (the "Agreement"), by and between Bernard Wolff ("Bernie") and
Ambient Corporation ("Ambient") respecting Kliks.com Ltd. The Agreement shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect except for the following:

Section 1.8 shall be amended to read as follows:

Subject to the provisions contained herein, from June 6, 2000 and thereafter,
Ambient shall loan (on terms and conditions contained in the attached loan
agreement, Appendix 1.8) to the Company up to an aggregate amount of $1,000,000
U.S. dollars to meet the financing needs of the Company in accordance with a
budget(s) adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company from time to time.
Ambient shall not be issued any additional shares or securities of any kind for
such payments.

Provided that the aggregate loan amount shall be reduced to $850,000 in the
event that Ambient's auditors so instruct.

A section 4.2 (a) shall be added to the Agreement as follows:

Bernie and Ambient shall be entitled to transfer their respective Proportionate
Shares in whole or in part to any subsidiary of Ambient Corporation without
being subject to the Right of Refusal set forth below.

Whereas the parties have affixed their signatures to this amendment as of the
effective date written above.


Ambient Corporation


\s\ Michael Braunold                    \s\ Bernie Wolff
--------------------                    ----------------
by: Michael Braunold                    Bernie Wolff
Director


                                      -1-
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28719]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Board of Visitors Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense Acquisition University.

ACTION: Board of visitors meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The next meeting of the Defense Acquisition University (DAU) 
Board of Visitors (BoV) will be held at the Packard Conference Center, 
Building 184, Ft. Belvoir, Virginia on Wednesday December 6, 2000 from 
0900 until 1500. The purpose of this meeting is to report back to the 
BoV on continuing items of interest.
    The meeting is open to the public; however, because of space 
limitations, allocation of seating will be made on a first-come, first 
served basis. Persons desiring to attend the meeting should call Mr. 
John Michel at 703.805.4575.

    Dated: November 3, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-28719 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17 -754V
Filed: January 4, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

RONALD DEVINGO

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ; Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Carol L. Gallagher, Linwood, NJ, for petitioner. Daniel Anthony Principato, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On June 8, 2017 , petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he received an influenza vaccine on November 12, 2015, and thereafter suffered from a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) . Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On January 3, 2018

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent states that “petitioner’s medical course is consistent with SIRVA as defined on the Vaccine Injury Table. ” Id. at 2. Respondent further agrees

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

eas e of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2

that “ petitioner suffered the residual effects of his condition for more than six months. ”

Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-267-002]

Take notice that on October 31, 2000, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) tendered for filing as part  of FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet to be effective November 1, 2000.

Substitute Twenty-Eighth Revised Sheet No. 17

ANR states that the filing is being filed in compliance with the Commission's order dated May 31, 2000 at Docket No. RP00-267-000, See ANR Pipeline Company, 91 FERC ¶61,195. The Commission's order approved but suspended the effective date of ANR's proposed cashout price surchange from June 1, 2000 until November 1, 2000.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-28939  Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40281

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARNOLDO MORALES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-200-5

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Arnoldo Morales has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Morales has filed responses. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow

us to make a fair evaluation of Morales’s ineffective assistance of counsel

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 22, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40281 Document: 00514126974 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/22/2017
No. 16-40281

2

claims; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to 

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Morales’s responses. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Morales’s motion to file an out-of-time response is 

GRANTED. His motions to relieve counsel and for the appointment of new 

counsel are DENIED. 

 Case: 16-40281 Document: 00514126974 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/22/2017
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

OMRAN HOLDING GROUP, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________ 

2018-1226

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in Nos. 1:16-cv-00446-MCW, 1:16-cv-00447-MCW, 

1:16-cv-00448-MCW, Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

ALEXA SANTORA, Fox Rothschild, LLP, Chicago, IL, 

argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by DIRK 

DENSFORD HAIRE, KELSEY MARYHELEN O'BRIEN, Washington, DC. 

 P. DAVIS OLIVER, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil 

Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented 

by ROBERT EDWARD KIRSCHMAN, JR., DOUGLAS K. MICKLE, 

CHAD A. READLER; JAMES D. STEPHENS, Middle East 
District, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Winchester, VA. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, REYNA, and TARANTO,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

 August 8, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court