AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed January 12, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00155-CR

No. 05-14-00156-CR

No. 05-14-00157-CR

No. 05-14-00158-CR

RANDY ALEXANDER REYES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-35901-U, F13-34158-U, F13-34208-U, F13-34209-U

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Lang-Miers, and Myers

Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

Randy Alexander Reyes appeals his convictions for burglary of a habitation, aggravated 

robbery with a deadly weapon (two offenses), and possession of alprazolam in an amount less 

than twenty-eight grams within a drug-free zone. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§ 29.03(a)(2), 

30.02(a)(1) (West 2011 & Supp. 2014); TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. §§ 481.117(a), (b), 

481.134(e) (West 2010 & Supp. 2014). The trial court assessed punishment at twenty years’ 

imprisonment for burglary; twenty-five years’ imprisonment for each aggravated robbery; and 

two years’ confinement in State jail for possession of alprazolam. On appeal, appellant’s 
-2-

attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. 

The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief 

presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable 

grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 

1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to 

file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 

319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders

cases).

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree 

the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably 

support the appeals.

We affirm the trial court’s judgments.

Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

140155F.U05
-3-

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT

RANDY ALEXANDER REYES, 

Appellant 

No. 05-14-00155-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 291st Judicial District 

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F11-35901-U).

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, 

Justices Bridges and Myers participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is 

AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered January 12, 2015.
-4-

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT

RANDY ALEXANDER REYES, 

Appellant 

No. 05-14-00156-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 291st Judicial District 

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F13-34158-U).

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, 

Justices Bridges and Myers participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered January 12, 2015.
-5-

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT

RANDY ALEXANDER REYES, 

Appellant 

No. 05-14-00157-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 291st Judicial District 

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F13-34208-U).

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, 

Justices Bridges and Myers participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered January 12, 2015.
-6-

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT

RANDY ALEXANDER REYES, 

Appellant 

No. 05-14-00158-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 291st Judicial District 

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F13-34209-U).

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, 

Justices Bridges and Myers participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered January 12, 2015.