alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GREEN et al. v. OWSLEY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 29, 1953.

• Charles L. Seale, Booneville, E. B. Rose, Beattyvi'lle, for appellants,

H. M. Shumate and Shumate & Shu-mate, Irvine, for appellee.

CAMMACK, Justice.

The appellants instituted this action to have a portion of an old county road closed. The action originated in the Ows-ley County Court.

The contention upon which the appellants sought to have the portion of the old road closed was that the Highway Department had constructed a new road in the near proximity of the old road. The lands of the appellants front on the old road. The Owsley County Board of Education owns approximately 31⁄2 acres of land, on which is located a county high school, which fronts oh the new road. The School Board also owns a small strip of land between the old road and the new road. The appellants cross this strip of land to reaclu the new road.

The ' commissioners appointed by the county court reported that it was to the best interests of the citizens of Owsley County for the old road to remain open. The county court confirmed that report. The appellants then appealed to the Ows-ley Circuit Court. By agreement of the parties the case was tried before the court without the intervention of a jury. The Circuit Court denied the relief sought by the appellants and confirmed the commissioners’ report.

The principal contention of the appellants is that the portion.of the old roadway in dispute is no longer needed -by the traveling public or-'the School Board. They contend that the old way is used only as a parking space when athletic contests and county fairs are held on the school site.. The School Board introduced evidence showing "that the old roadway is used for purposes other than parking and that it furnishes a more convenient outlet for the traveling public.when large gatherings are held on the school site.

We think the evidence amply supports the' finding-of the lower court and -the judgment is'affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1998 10-QSB OF CSB FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,542
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     17,278
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         27,322
<ALLOWANCE>                                        182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,983
<DEPOSITS>                                      36,498
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                361
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  47,983
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,120
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  561
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,681
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 824
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 824
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              857
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   3
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    659
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    236
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         181
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       181
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   165
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       13
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  182
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               182
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Case 3:22-cr-00119-L Document 25 Filed 08/18/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 42
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 47636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19273]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9915-22-OA]

National Environmental Education Advisory Council Meetings

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation and reschedule of teleconference 
meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) Office of 
External Affairs and Environmental Education (OEAEE) is issuing this 
notice to cancel the August 8, 2014 NEEAC Teleconference and reschedule 
it for August 21, 2014 from 3:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. Notice of 
the August 8, 2014 meeting was previously published on July 1, 2014: FR 
Doc 2014-15397 Filed 6-30-2014. The purpose of these teleconference(s), 
is to discuss specific topics of relevance for consideration by the 
council in order to provide advice and insights to the Agency on 
environmental education.

DATES: The National Environmental Education Advisory Council will hold 
a public meeting (teleconference) on Thursday August 21, 2014 from 3:00 
p.m.-4:00 p.m. (Eastern Time).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information regarding this 
cancellation and rescheduling of the meeting, please contact Mr. Javier 
Araujo, Designated Federal Officer (DFO), EPA National Environmental 
Education Advisory Council, at (202) 564-2642 or email at: 
Araujo.javier@epa.gov.

    Dated: August 6, 2014.
Javier Araujo,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-19273 Filed 8-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Exhibit 35.1




Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


The undersigned, Mark Kaczynski, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:
  (1)           The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 14, 2015 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2015-A Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and
  (2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
  This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued asset-backed securities.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 15th day of June, 2016.




/s/ Mark Kaczynski_________________


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

JOHN HAYLEY and LAUREN HAYLEY, §

 §

Plaintiffs, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 7:22-cv-00036-O

 §

MERIDIAN SECURITY INSURANCE §

COMPANY, §

 §

Defendant. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for 

review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and 

Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Claim for 

Attorneys’ Fees (ECF No. 8) is GRANTED, Plaintiffs’ claim for attorneys’ fees is hereby stricken, 

and Plaintiffs are barred from recovery of attorneys’ fees incurred after May 10, 2022.

SO ORDERED on this 17th day of October, 2022.

Case 7:22-cv-00036-O Document 30 Filed 10/17/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1153
JACQUELINE WALDEN

, Appellant,

v.

HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT AND COMMERCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

, Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 4095

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 7 , 2016

. An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims

. Mark A. Massey , Judge

.
Date of Accident: March 27, 2014.

Michael J. Winer of the Law Office of Michael J. Winer, P.A., Tampa , for Appellant.

Steven Hovsepian and Katherine Stone Agliano of Barbas, Nunez, Sanders, Butler & Hovsepian, Tampa , for Appellee s

.

PER CURIAM.

Th e court having received the August 24, 2016, order of the Supreme Court

of Florida quashing this court’s opinion of February 19, 2016, and remanding the **CORRECTED PAGES: pg 1 CORRECTION IS**  **UNDERLINED IN**
**RED MAILED: October 7, 2016** 
**BY: KMS** 2 matter for reconsideration upon application of Castellanos v. Next Door Co.

, 192

So. 3d 431 (Fla. 2016)

, and finding that reversal is warranted in light of that opinion,

the order of th e Judge of Compensation Claims is REVERSED and this case is

REMANDED for proceedings consistent with that opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
MAY TERM, 1748.

#### Thomas Reeder’s Lessee *against*Jane Smith.

EJECTMENT for a tract of land called *Workington*Park, in *Saint Mary’s*County.

*159At the trial of this cause at the Assises held in September, 1747, for *Saint Mary’s*County, it appeared from the warrant of resurvey in this cause, on which the defence was taken and the pretensions of the plaintiff and defendant are laid down, that the plaintiff, in laying down of *Workington*Park, had run across and taken in parts of a tract of land called *Haphazard.,*laid down by the plaintiff and admitted by the plat to be the defendant’s, and an elder grant than that of *Workington*Park. The Jury found a general verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant’s counsel insisted that judgment ought not to be rendered for the plaintiff thereon, because it included part of *Haphazard.*But the J udges overruled the objection and rendered judgment on the verdict. The defendant excepted. The Provincial Court affirmed the Judgment.

The defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals.

Lib. E. J. No. 10. fol. 933.
MBUAPCD

SIP Completeness Checklist 1

MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

RULE NUMBER: 902 DATE AMENDED: 4/20/05 

REGULATION TITLE: District’s Request for Information 

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

Attached/Not Attached*

 X COMPLETE COPY OF THE RULE. If amended rule, indicate

changes in underline and strikeout format, compared to existing

approved SIP version.

 X REFERENCE TO OTHER RULES. If the rule contains a reference

to any other rule, attach a copy of that other rule unless it has already

been submitted to EPA as a part of a previous SIP submittal.

 X PUBLIC NOTICE EVIDENCE. Include a copy of the newspaper

clipping certification with date of publication. Include a copy of

notice from each newspaper.

 X RESOLUTION/MINUTE ORDER. Must include Board Clerk

certification that hearing was held in accordance with information in

the public notice; must also include list of rules adopted or amended,

date of public hearing, and statement of compliance with H&SC

Sections 40725-40728 [Administrative Procedures Act].

 X PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES: Any written comments

submitted to the District during pubic notice period or at the hearing;

also include any written responses prepared by the District as normal

District procedure.
MBUAPCD

SIP Completeness Checklist 2

OTHER INFORMATION

Attached/Not Attached

 X MODELING SUPPORT. Provide as appropriate; not required for

VOC and NOx rules; required where rule is a relaxation in an

attainment area for SO2, PM10, CO, or NOx [for NO2 purposes]; for

relaxation or shift of emissions in nonattainment area for SO2, PM10,

CO, and NOx, give reference to the approved SIP.

 X ECONOMIC/TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS

FROM EPA POLICIES: As appropriate, describe special

circumstances, i.e., where alternative RACT is used, extended

compliance dates included, etc.**

 X ADDITIONAL MATERIALS: Any other supporting information,

such as staff reports, which are included with the rule package but not

specifically required in the checklist above.

-------------

* Attached separate sheet for each rule explaining why any materials are not included and when

they will be submitted to the ARB.

** Completed enforcement checklist will fulfill this requirement.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 27

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the House from

ruary 2, 1993.Wednesday, January 27, 1993, to Tuesday, Feb-
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 27

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on Wednes3 day, January 27, 1993, it stand adjourned until noon on

4 Tuesday, February 2, 1993.

Passed the House of Representatives January 27,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 198 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.198
                                        Agreed to January 25, 1994      
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on Wednesday, January 26, 1994, it stand 
adjourned until noon on Tuesday, February 1, 1994.
Attest:







                                  Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:







                                                Secretary of the Senate.`
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 20, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 20, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19A0206. MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM IN WAYCROSS, INC. v. WILLIE JEAN THOMAS et al..
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1998 FORM 10-QSB OF CSB FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,090
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     18,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             211
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               211
<LOANS>                                         26,713
<ALLOWANCE>                                        177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,606
<DEPOSITS>                                      37,032
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                382
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  47,606
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    530
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  274
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   804
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 405
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 405
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              399
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       18
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     71
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          48
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        48
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        430
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   171
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       12
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  177
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               177
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Case 3:22-cr-00120-X Document 25 Filed 10/11/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 56
MOTION FOR EXTENSION

PAGE 1 NO. 06

- 15

- 00059

- CV

______________________________________________________

IN THE SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

______________________________________________________

Frankie Marie Miller, Individually and as Representative

of the Estate of T.J. Miller, Appellant,

v.

John D. Mullen, M.D. and Titus Regional Medical Center, Appellees.

______________________________________________________

APPELLANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

______________________________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

1. Appellant’s Brief is due on November 12, 2015. Appellant seeks a 21

-
day extension to make the brief due on December 3, 2015.

2. This is the first request for an extension.

3. The record was filed in this case on October 12, 2015. Between

October 12 and November 12, the undersigned has had or will have two oral

arguments in the Supreme Court of Texas and another in the Texas Court of ACCEPTED 06-15-00059-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 11/9/2015 11:00:56 AM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERKMOTION FOR EXTENSION

PAGE 2 Criminal Appeals, and two pe titions for review due in the Texas Supreme Court.

This is in addition to the ordinary workload of counsel (which includes a reply brief

in the El Paso Court of Appeals, appellees’ brief in the Dallas Court of Appeals,

appellee ’ s brief in the Fort Worth Court of Appeals, and a ppellant ’ s brief in the

Fort Worth Co urt of Appeals).

4

. Appellee does not oppose this motion.

Based on the foregoing, Appellant as ks that the deadline to file her brief be

extended to D ecember 3 , 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

/ s/Charles “Chad” Baruch The Law Office of Chad Baruch Texas Bar Number 01864300 3201 Main Street Rowlett, Texas 75088 Telephone: (972) 412

- 7192 Facsimile: (972) 412

- 4028 E

- Mail: baruchEsq@aol.com

Attorney for Appell

antMOTION FOR EXTENSION

PAGE 3 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned certifies that he conferred with Russell Schell , counsel for appellee, who stated that he does not oppose the relief sought by this motion.

/s/Charles “Chad” Baruc h

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of this notice of appeal was served this 9 th day of N ovember , 2015, upon the following counsel of record by efiling and email:

Russell W. Schell Schell Cooley LLP 15455 Dallas Parkway, Suite 550 Addison, Texas 75001 Trial Counsel for Appellees rschell@schellcooley.com vbrumley@schellcooley. com shaley@schellcooley.com

/s/Charles “Chad” Baruch
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Entrust Financial Services, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the year ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Scott J. Sax, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: March
29, 2004 |  | By:/s/  Scott J. Sax
      Scott J. Sax, Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------