alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

The National Park Service is seeking public comments and suggestions on the planning of the 2000 Christmas Pageant of Peace, which opens on December 11, 2000, on the Ellipse (President's Park), south of the White House. The meeting will be held at 11 a.m. on Friday, November 17, in room 234 of the National Capital Region Building, at 1100 Ohio Drive, SW, Washington, DC (East Potomac Park).

Persons who would like to comment at the meeting should notify the National Park Service by November 15 by calling the White House Visitor Center weekdays between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. at (202) 208-1631. Written comments may be sent to the Park Manager, White House Visitor Center, 1100 Ohio Drive, SW, Washington, DC 20252, and can be accepted until November 14.

Dated: November 1, 2000.

Stan E. Lock,

Deputy Director, White House Liaison.

[FR Doc. 00-28574  Filed 11-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 4/25/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES TIMOTHY KLING, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. G. GREG VALDEZ, Individually and in his official capacity as Third Judicial District Attorney; RAMON ACOSTA, Individually and in his capacity as an employee of the Third Judicial District Attorney, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-2131 (D.C. No. CIV 94-618-M) (D.N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before PORFILIO, McKAY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. **
Mr. Kling appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of DefendantsAppellees on his civil rights and state law claims in connection with his termination as an investigator. Although he was ordered reinstated and awarded back pay in a state post-- 2 -

termination proceeding, he contends that qualified immunity for the Defendants was improper and that his First Amendment claim alleging termination due to political activity should have gone forward. Our review of these legal issues is de novo. Mr. Kling cannot assert a constitutional right for deprivation of substantive or procedural due process under our precedent given the remedies afforded him. See Workman v. Jordan , 32 F.3d 475, 479 (10th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 1357 (1995); Archuleta v. Colorado Dep’t of Institutions , 936 F.2d 483, 489-90 (10th Cir. 1991). Therefore, qualified immunity was properly granted. See Siegert v. Gilley , 500 U.S. 226, 232-33 (1991). While we may agree that a state post-deprivation remedy does not necessarily foreclose a First Amendment retaliation claim, cf. Williams v. St. Louis County , 812 F.2d 1079, 1081 n.3 (8th Cir. 1987), it is unlikely that the complaint envisioned an independent First Amendment claim. Be that as it may, Plaintiff’s response to the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was wholly inadequate to preclude summary judgment on such a claim, consisting of references to allegations contained in the complaint. See III R. doc. 40 at 3-6. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 248-49 (1986). Plaintiff was required to come forth with evidence; Defendants were not required to negate the allegations. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986).

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court- 3 - Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

WILLIAM McKNIGHT, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 7:22-cv-00037-M-BP

 § 

DAVID DUKE, Sheriff, §

Wichita County, Texas, §

§ 

Defendant. §

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the 

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

It is therefore ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 

SO ORDERED this 7th day of July, 2022.

Case 7:22-cv-00037-M-BP Document 13 Filed 07/07/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 61
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28941]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-518-018]


PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Change in FERC Gas Tariff

November 6, 2000.
    Take notice that on November 1, 2000, PG&E Gas Transmission, 
Northwest Corporation (PG&E GTN) tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1-A., Twelfth Revised Sheet 
No. 7 and Fifth Revised Sheet No. 7.01. PG&E GTN requests that the 
above-referenced tariff sheets become effective November 1, 2000.
    PG&E GTN states that these sheets are being filed to reflect the 
implementation of two negotiated rate agreements.
    PG&E GTN further states that a copy of this filing has been served 
on PG&E GTN's jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory 
agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28941 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### L. H. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Frank WERBNER, Appellee.

No. 10955.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

April 30, 1941.

Rehearing Denied June 11, 1941.

See, also, 149 S.W.2d 600.

Hoyo, Sharpe & Williams and E. C. Overall, all of San Antonio, for appellant.

Moursund, Ball, Moursund & Bergstrom, and Bennett & Klein, all of San Antonio, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, without written opinion Page v. Hart, Tex.Civ.App., 124 S.W.2d 399; Tucker v. Higdon, Tex.Civ.App., 115 S.W.2d 973, and authorities there cited; Texas & N. O. Ry. v. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040.
Exhibit C

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 86-3 Filed 04/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1910
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 No. 07-4393 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

STEVEN ANTHONY LAMONDS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (1:06-cr-00244-JAB; 1:06-cr-00282-JAB-1)

Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 23, 2007

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, William S. Trivette,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Clifton Thomas Barrett, Assistant United States

Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Steven Anthony Lamonds pled guilty, pursuant to a written

plea agreement, to six offenses arising out of a bank robbery and

a robbery of a Food Lion grocery store. Lamonds was sentenced as

an armed career criminal to 180 months of imprisonment on all

counts except Count Three of the bank robbery indictment

(brandishing a short-barreled shotgun during a bank robbery), for

which he was sentenced to a mandatory minimum consecutive term of

ten years imprisonment. 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(B), (e)(1) (2000).

 Lamonds’ attorney has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), contending that no

meritorious issues exist for appeal but suggesting that the

district court imposed an unreasonable sentence under United

States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). Although informed of his

right to file a pro se supplemental brief, Lamonds has not done so.

Lamonds was sentenced to a total term of 300 months

imprisonment, the statutory mandatory minimum sentence. The

district court possessed no discretion to sentence below the

statutory mandatory minimum sentence, because “Booker did nothing

to alter the rule that judges cannot depart below a statutorily

provided minimum sentence.” United States v. Robinson, 404 F.3d

850, 862 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 916 (2005).

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire

record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for
- 3 -

appeal. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in

writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United

States for further review. If the client requests that a petition

be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be

frivolous, then counsel may move this court for leave to withdraw

from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy

thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 17 Filed 05/31/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 139
Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 17 Filed 05/31/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 140
Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 17 Filed 05/31/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 141
#### DACY v. STATE.

No. 25740.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 5, 1952.

No attorney for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was found guilty of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated and assessed a fine of $250.

The proceedings appear regular in every respect and nothing is presented for review by this court in the absence of bills of exception and a statement of facts.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Robert D. Fletcher

Deputy Executive Officer

California Air Resources Board

P.O. Box 2815

Sacramento, CA 95812

DearMrir:

the California

On February 28 2011, the California Air Resources Board submitted revisions to

with

State Implementation Plan (SIP). We have reviewed materials submitted

Part 51,

the

Appendix

following rules and found that they fulfill the completeness criteria in 40 CFR V.

APCD/AQMD Rule # Rule Title

Mendocino County 130 Definitions Mendocino County 221 Federal Permitting Requirements for Greenhouse Mendocino County 494 Potential to Emit Limitations North Coast Unified 110 New Source Review and Prevention of

Significant Deterioration Northern Sonoma County 130 Definitions Northern Sononia County 221 Federal Permitting for Greenhouse Gas Emissions

This addresses all revisions in this submittal. In the coming months we will review the complete revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section 110(k).

Allen

Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Cynthia G. at (415) 947-4120.

C ey,

Deborah Jordan

Director, Air Division
Mr. Rick Martin, 

, 

North Coast Unified AQMD

Mr. Michael Guzzetta, Manager

Rule Evaluation Section

Stationary Source Division
Case 7:22-cr-00013-O Document 38 Filed 04/18/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 106
Case 7:22-cr-00013-O Document 38 Filed 04/18/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 107
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                     5
<LEGEND>                                      
</LEGEND>                                     
<CIK>                                         0000940516
<NAME>                                        KALAN GOLD CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S.DOLLARS
                                                    
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                        331
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              0
<PP&E>                                        5,446
<DEPRECIATION>                                3,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         180,313
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      73
<OTHER-SE>                                   (178,295)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2,091
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              0
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 67,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (4,517)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            6,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (68,874)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (68,874)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-177-001]

Take notice that on October 31, 2000, Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C. (Maritimes) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to become effective on November 1, 2000.

Second Revised Sheet No. 9

Maritimes states that it is filing the above tariff sheet to reflect the expiration of existing negotiated rate contracts.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but  will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings.                           ( print page 67728)                        Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-28936 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of Stockhouse
Inc., a Colorado corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best
of such officers knowledge and belief, that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: March 31,
      2009 | /s/
      Marcus A New               
|-------------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                           | Marcus A. New                        
|                           | President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification shall not be
deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not
be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act or the Securities Exchange Act.

---
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11.1

SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED                  NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                       DECEMBER 31,                       DECEMBER 31,
                                                                 1998              1997              1998               1997
                                                             -----------        -----------      ------------        ----------

<S>                                                          <C>                <C>               <C>               <C>
Net loss applicable to common stock                          $  (312,078)       $  (355,471)      $(1,386,892)      $(1,122,698)

Weighted average number of common shares equivalent:
Common shares outstanding                                      4,624,636          3,675,375         4,557,769         3,716,173

Common equivalent shares representing shares
  issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants                 0                  0                 0
                                                                                                                              0

Incremental common equivalent shares (calculated                       0                  0                 0                 0
  using the higher of end of period or average fair
  market value)

      Total weighted average shares - as adjusted              4,624,636          3,675,375         4,557,769         3,716,173

      Basic                                                        (0.07)             (0.10)            (0.30)            (0.30)
      Diluted                                                      (0.07)             (0.10)            (0.30)            (0.30)
</TABLE>