alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 25924.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 25, 1952.

Motion to Reinstate Appeal Denied Oct. 15, 1952.

No attorney for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a penalty of four years in the county jail and $1000 fine on a complaint charging him with the offense of unlawfully possessing whisky for the purpose of sale in a dry area. The complaint further alleges two prior convictions for a like offense.

The transcript contains no record of a notice of appeal. Consequently, this court has no jurisdiction and the appeal is dismissed.

On Appellant’s Motion to Reinstate Appeal.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Appellant has filed, with his motion to reinstate the appeal, affidavits attesting the fact that he did give notice of appeal in the trial court, and seeks thereby to have this court recognize that notice of appeal was properly given.

This we cannot do. Whether appellant did, in fact, give such notice of appeal in the trial court- is a matter to be determined in that court.

The motion to reinstate the appeal is overruled.

Opinion approved by the court.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00207-CR

JOSE LUIS ALVAREZ

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-957-12-G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 13, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67419]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28791]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request for Review of a 
Revised Information Collection: Federal Employees Health Benefits 
(FEHB) Open Season Express Interactive Voice Response (IVR) System

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) intends to submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget a request for review of a revised information 
collection. The FEHB Open Season Express IVR System and the open season 
web site, Open Season Online, is used by retirees and survivors; it 
collects information for changing FEHB enrollments, collecting 
dependent and other insurance information for self and family 
enrollments, requesting plan brochures, requesting a change of address, 
requesting cancellation or suspension of FEHB benefits, asking to make 
payment to the Office of Personnel Management when the FEHB payment is 
greater than the monthly annuity amount, or requesting a copy of the 
FEHB Customer Satisfaction Survey results.
    We estimate we will receive 112,000 responses per year to the IVR 
system and the on-line web site. Each response takes approximately 10 
minutes to complete. The annual burden is 18,666 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on 
(202) 606-2150, or email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#610c03150e0e0c0418210e110c4f060e17"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81ece3f5eeeeece4f8c1eef1ecafe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a>.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before 
December 11, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--

James K. Freiert, Chief, Retirement Services Division, Retirement and 
Insurance Service, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 
NW, Room 1312, Washington, DC 20415.
and

Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office 
Building, NW, Room 3002, Washington, DC 20503.

For Information Regarding Administrative Coordination Contact: Donna G. 
Lease, Team Leader, Forms Analysis and Design, Budget and 
Administrative Services Division, (202) 606-0623.

Office of Personnel Management.
Janice R. Lachance,
Director.
[FR Doc. 00-28791 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jack E. Stover, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016of Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc.;
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: | April 28, 2017 | /s/ Jack E. Stover           
|----- | -------------- | -----------------------------
|      |                | Chief Executive Officer      
|      |                | (Principal Executive Officer)
Case 3:22-cv-00735-S-BN   Document 35   Filed 01/11/24    Page 1 of 1   PageID 391
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Bradley Leroy Thompson, Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00002

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 115th District Court of Upshur County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 16,737 ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss,

Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial cou rt

. We note that the appellant, Bradley Leroy Thompson, has adequately indicated his

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDER ED NOVEMBER 19, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67282-67283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28689]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-2375; MM Docket No. 99-75; RM-9446]

Radio Broadcasting Services; Grants, Milan, NM

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Against the Wind 
Broadcasting, Inc., licensee of Station KXXQ(FM) (formerly KQEO(FM)), 
Grants, New Mexico, reconsiders and sets aside the reallotment of 
Channel 264A from Grants to Milan, New Mexico. See 65 FR 59751 (October 
6, 2000).

[[Page 67283]]

DATES: Effective December 11, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria M. McCauley, Mass Media 
Bureau, (202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM Docket No. 99-75, adopted October 11, 
2000, and released October 20, 2000. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 445 12th Street, SW, 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334. 336.

Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b) the FM Table of Allotments under New Mexico is 
amended by removing Milan, Channel 264A and adding Channel 264A at 
Grants.

    Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-28689 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JOHN DOE,

Plaintiff,

v.

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00297-O

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Appoint Magistrate as Mediator (ECF 

No. 69), filed August 8, 2022. Noting the motion is unopposed, the Court GRANTS the motion 

and REFERS this case for mediation with United States Magistrate Judge Ray.

SO ORDERED this 8th day of August, 2022.

Case 4:22-cv-00297-O Document 70 Filed 08/08/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 4022
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          19,694
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,891
<PP&E>                                         255,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 279,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          998,103
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (718,212)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   279,891
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,428
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (24,428)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>
Case 5:22-cr-00041-H-BV Document 94 Filed 07/06/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 212
Case 5:22-cr-00041-H-BV Document 94 Filed 07/06/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 213
#### Ruben WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 25420.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 24, 1951.

Ross Hoffman, Brady, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Unlawfully selling whisky in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, $300 and forty-five days in jail.

The information in this case is subject to the same fatal defect as pointed out in Barnett v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 242 S.W.2d 885.

The judgment is reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1042

ANA YESSELI PINEDA-RAMOS,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: March 31, 2022 Decided: April 26, 2022

Before KING, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Petition granted in part, vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Nash Fayad, FAYAD LAW, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Petitioner. Brian 

Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jonathan Robbins, Senior Litigation Counsel, 

Dana M. Camilleri, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner Ana Yesseli Pineda-Ramos is a citizen of Honduras who was ordered 

removed from the United States. Fearing return to Honduras because members of a gang 

called Los Ardones had approached her at school, tried to force her to sell drugs, threatened 

to use her as a prostitute, and twice attempted to kidnap her, Pineda-Ramos applied for 

asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture 

(CAT). The immigration judge rejected each claim. The Board of Immigration Appeals 

agreed, concluding that—on her asylum and withholding claims—Pineda-Ramos had 

failed to show the required nexus between her proposed particular social group and the 

harm she feared. The Board also rejected Pineda-Ramos’s CAT claim (which has no nexus 

requirement, see 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16–18) because she “never reported the threats or 

attempted kidnappings to police, as she was afraid of retaliation from gang members she 

believes are connected to the police.” AR 3.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude the agency’s nexus decision

is supported by substantial evidence and the record does not compel a contrary result. See 

INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). We therefore deny the petition for review 

on that issue.

We cannot, however, uphold the Board’s decision on Pineda-Ramos’s CAT claim.

Our recent en banc decision in Portillo Flores v. Garland, 3 F.4th 615, 635, 637 (4th Cir. 

2021), confirmed that the Board may not apply “a per se reporting requirement” to reject 

CAT claims. Because the Board relied only on just such a requirement when rejecting 

Pineda-Ramos’s CAT claim, we grant the petition for review on that issue, vacate the 
3

Board’s decision, and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion or 

Portillo Flores.

PETITION GRANTED IN PART;

VACATED AND REMANDED
#### KEE v. STATE.

No. 21511.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 19, 1941.

*92No attorney for appellant.

Llóyd W. Davidson, _ State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for rape. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing has been presented authorizing a reversal of the conviction.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# TIME AND DATE: 

9:30 a.m., Tuesday, November 14, 2000.

# PLACE:

NTSB Board Room, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594.

# STATUS: 

Open to the Public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

                    7302 Highway Accident Report: School Bus and Dump Truck                           ( print page 67021)                        Collision, Central Bridge, New York, on October 21, 1999.                

# NEWS MEDIA CONTRACT: 

Telephone: (202) 314-6100.

Individuals requesting specific accommodation should contact Mrs. Barbara Bush at (202) 314-6220 by Friday, November 9, 2000.

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rhonda Underwood (202) 314-6065.

Dated: November 3, 2000.

Rhonda Underwood,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-28771  Filed 11-6-00; 10:50 am]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
SERVED MAY 20, 2011 v^RTMENT OF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ':i OPERA!IONS 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC •(i.MvY23 A ^: 53 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-0296 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2008SW210191) has been 

assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and 

other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA 

Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Ronnie A. Yod© 

Chief Administrative law Judgi 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2011-0296 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Francis C. Heil, Respondent's Counsel 

Legal Department 

P.O. Box 619616 

Mail Drop 5675 

DFW Airport, TX 75261-9616 

TEL: 202-496-5642 

FAX: 202-496-5660 

Rena M. Price, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Safety Enforcement Branch 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E1, RMP 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 

Fort Worth, TX 76137-0007 

TEL: 817-222-5068 

FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Servicewasby U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following 

address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building— 

Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") of Technology Visions Group, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), I, James A. Giansiracusa, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 20, 2003                           /s/ James A. Giansiracusa
                                              -------------------------
                                              James A. Giansiracusa
                                              Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Secured Digital  Applications,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ending March 31, 2007 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),   I,  Patrick  Soon-Hock  Lim,  Chief  Executive  Officer  (principal
executive officer) of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
-------------------------
Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2007