alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 189 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 189

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 23, 1993

        Received; referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that every appropriate effort 
 should be made to avert a humanitarian disaster in Bosnia-Herzegovina 
and the other former Yugoslav republics during the winter of 1993-1994.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the United States, together with the international 
        community, should make every appropriate effort to ensure that 
        the people of Bosnia and Herzegovina have adequate medical 
        supplies, food, and other humanitarian assistance during the 
        winter of 1993-1994 in order to prevent a possible humanitarian 
        disaster;
            (2) the United States should support necessary and 
        appropriate preparations to facilitate a relief effort in order 
        to prevent a possible humanitarian disaster;
            (3) all parties should cooperate with the provision of 
        humanitarian assistance to those in need throughout the former 
        Yugoslav republics, especially Bosnia and Herzegovina;
            (4) the United States should provide similar assistance to 
        the peoples endangered this winter throughout the former 
        Yugoslav republics, especially the former Yugoslav Republic of 
        Macedonia; and
            (5) the United States should expend appropriated funds for 
        such purposes as expeditiously as possible.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 23 
      (legislative day, November 22), 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7190

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICHARD RONTE JACKSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-02-700400; CA-04-646-7) Submitted: March 30, 2006 Decided: April 6, 2006 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Ronte Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Richard Ronte Jackson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) and denying his motion to reconsider filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jackson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67616-67617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-29008]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Immigration and Naturalization Service

8 CFR Parts 103 and 214

[INS 1946-98]
RIN 1115-AF29


Delegation of the Adjudication of Certain Temporary Agricultural 
Worker (H-2A) Petitions, Appellate and Revocation Authority for Those 
Petitions to the Secretary of Labor

AGENCY: Immigration and Naturalization Service, Justice.

ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Immigration and Naturalization Service (Service) is 
delaying the effective date of a final rule

[[Page 67617]]

previously published in the Federal Register on July 13, 2000, at 65 FR 
43528-43534 which delegated the adjudication of certain petitions for 
agricultural workers (H-2A) to the United States Department of Labor 
(DOL).

DATES: The effective date for the regulation published on July 13, 
2000, at 65 FR 43528-43534 amending 8 CFR parts 103 and 214 is delayed 
from November 13, 2000, until October 1, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John W. Brown, Adjudications Officer, 
Benefits Division, Immigration and Naturalization Service, 425 I Street 
NW., Room 3214, Washington, DC 20536, telephone (202) 514-3228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 13, 2000, the Service published a 
final rule in the Federal Register at 65 FR 43528-43534 delegating the 
authority to adjudicate certain H-2A petitions to the DOL. The final 
rule, which amended 8 CFR parts 103 and 214, was to take effect on 
November 13, 2000. The delay in the effective date of the final rule 
will afford the public as much opportunity as possible to become 
familiar with the new procedures in the issuance of temporary 
employment of nonimmigrant aliens in agriculture in the United States.

    Dated: November 7, 2000.
Doris Meissner,
Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service.
[FR Doc. 00-29008 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
Search Help More Search Options 

Printable Version 

Refrigerated 

Beverage Vending 

Machines ANOPR 

Analytical 

Spreadsheets 

The spreadsheets below support 

the Advance Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking (ANOPR) for 

refrigerated beverage vending 

machines. They are interactive 

tools for the engineering 

analysis, the life-cycle cost 

analysis, and the national 

energy savings analysis. 

Instructions on how to use 

these spreadsheets can be 

found in the ANOPR Technical

Support Document. 

z Engineering Analysis 

Spreadsheet (Excel 2.6 

MB) 

z Life-Cycle Costs (LCC) 

Spreadsheets (Excel 5.7 

MB) 

z National Energy Savings 

(NES) Spreadsheets 

(Excel 12.5 MB) 

Contact Information 

Charles Llenza

Project Manager 

(202) 586-2192 

Printable Version 

EERE Information Center 

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/beverage_machi... 10/28/2008

EERE2006STD0125 COMMENT 23
Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov 

Content Last Updated: 07/09/2008 

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/beverage_machi... 10/28/2008

EERE2006STD0125 COMMENT 23
Case 2:22-cv-00080-Z-BR Document 7 Filed 03/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 30
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Secured Digital  Applications,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly  period ending June 30, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Chee Hong Leong,  Chief Financial  Officer  (principal  financial
officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Chee Hong Leong
-------------------
Chee Hong Leong
Chief Financial Officer
August 15, 2005
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 57

To recognize the heroic sacrifice of the Special Agents of the Bureau of

Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms in Waco, Texas.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1993

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. ROSTENKOWSKI, Mr. PICKLE, Mr. EDWARDS of

Texas, Mr. VISCLOSKY Mr. DARDEN, Mr. OLVER, Mr. BEVILL, Mr.

SABO, Mr. ANDREWS of Texas, Mr. ARCHER, Mr. LIGHTFOOT, Mr.

WOLF, Mr. ISTOOK, and Mr. HOUGHTON) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Ways

and Means and the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To recognize the heroic sacrifice of the Special Agents of

the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms in Waco,

Texas.

Whereas Special Agents Steve Willis, Robert J. Williams,

Conway LeBleu, and Todd McKeehan, of the Bureau of

Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, were killed by hostile

gunfire in the performance of an heroic effort to disarm

a hostile cult and to protect the lives of innocent persons,

including children, living in its compound;

Whereas these men, along with 15 other special agents who

were wounded during this confrontation, were members

of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms elite
2

•HCON 57 IH

Special Response Teams, whose members are highly

trained and experienced in the execution of high-risk operations;

Whereas such Special Response Teams have been deployed

over 230 times in the past year with no injury to any

agent, including during a highly-publicized siege involving

a fugitive white supremacist and during the Los Angeles

civil disturbances in 1992;

Whereas 182 special agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms have been killed in the line of duty

since Prohibition; and

Whereas the men and women of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms mourn the loss of their brother officers, but maintain discipline and a commitment to the

protection of our citizens at the risk of their own lives

on a daily basis: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the sacrifice and dedication of the

3 agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms

4 is a cornerstone of our system of justice and cause for

5 both sorrow and pride.

Æ
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08250

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

08250\08250_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

08250\08250_ Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 08250\08250_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 08250\08250_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08250\08250_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08250\08250_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08250\08250_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08250\08250_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

08250\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08250_ aerialmap.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08250\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08250_Block_Diagram_D1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08250\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08250_Block_Diagram_D2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08250\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08250_Water_Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

NIKELA H., §

PLAINTIFF, §

 §

V. § CASE NO. 3:22-CV-0939-N-BK

 § 

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL §

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, §

DEFENDANT. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND CONCLUSIONS

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge Renée Harris Toliver made findings, conclusions and a 

recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed objections, and the District Court has made a de 

novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection 

was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions and 

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2023.

_________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00939-N-BK Document 23 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 3848
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

YOUNES LAFDI §

§

§

v. § CASE NO. 3-22-CV-0922-S

 §

DAVID HOLMAN, OFFICER SMITH, §

and CITY OF FORNEY §

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS RENEWED 12(B)(5)

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR INSUFFICIENT PROCESS

COME on to be considered Defendants Holman, Smith, and City of Forney’s RENEWED

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR INSUFFICIENT PROCESS AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT, and the Court having

considered same finds that it has merit and should be granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Holman, Smith, and City of Forney’s

RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS FOR INSUFFICIENT PROCESS AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT be and hereby

is GRANTED and the Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Holman, Smith, and City of Forney,

however identified, be and hereby are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SIGNED this the ___________ day of __________________, 2023.

_________________________________

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE PRESIDING

Case 3:22-cv-00922-S-BK Document 17-1 Filed 04/17/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 68
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 176

To recognize and encourage the convening of a National Silver Haired

Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 8, 1993

Mr. GEPHARDT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To recognize and encourage the convening of a National

Silver Haired Congress.

Whereas many States have encouraged and facilitated the

creation of senior citizen legislative and advocacy bodies;

Whereas in creating such bodies these States have provided

many older Americans the opportunity to express concerns, promote appropriate interests, and advance the

common good by influencing legislation and actions of

State government; and

Whereas a National Silver Haired Congress, with representatives from each State, would provide a national forum for

a nonpartisan evaluation of grassroots solutions to concerns shared by an increasing number of older Americans: Now, therefore, be it
2

•HCON 176 IH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress hereby recognizes and en3 courages the convening of an annual National Silver

4 Haired Congress in the City of Washington, District of

5 Columbia.

Æ
<PAGE>
 
SGV BANCORP, INC.
EXHIBIT NO. 11: STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                               Nine months ended   
                                                 March 31, 1997   
                                              --------------------
                                              (in thousands except 
                                               per share amounts)  
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
<S>                                           <C>
Net Earnings.................................       $  237
                                                    ======
                                              
Weighted average shares outstanding..........        2,324
Common stock equivalents due to dilutive      
  effect on stock options....................           10
                                                    ------
                                              
Total weighted average common shares          
  and equivalents outstanding................        2,332
                                                    ======
                                              
                                              
Primary earnings per share...................       $ 0.10
                                                    ======
Total weighted average common shares          
  and equivalent outstanding.................        2,332
                                              
Additional dilutive shares using the end of   
  period market value versus the average      
  market value when applying the treasury     
  stock method...............................            0
                                                    ------
                                              
Total weighted average common shares and      
  equivalent outstanding for fully diluted    
  computation................................        2,332
                                                    ======
                                              
Fully diluted earnings per share.............       $ 0.10
                                                    ======
</TABLE>
#### ROBINSON v. STATE.

No. 22161.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 10, 1942.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 14, 1942.

A. H. Gist, of Dallas, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction is for misdemeanor theft, the punishment assessed being confinement in the county jail for thirty days.

The record is before us without statement of facts or 'bills of exception. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged and waived a jury upon the trial. All matters of procedure appear regular. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 34 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 34


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 24 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

                                Received


_______________________________________________________________________


                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION


 
   Calling for a continued United States policy of opposition to the 
resumption of commercial whaling, and otherwise expressing the sense of 
  the Congress with respect to conserving and protecting the world's 
               whale, dolphin, and porpoise populations.

Whereas there is significant widespread support in the international community 
        for the view that for scientific, ecological, and educational reasons, 
        whales should no longer be hunted for profit;
Whereas there is concern that efforts will be made at the 1993 Annual Meeting of 
        the International Whaling Commission to overturn the Commission's 
        existing moratorium on commercial whaling of large whales;
Whereas there are species of small cetaceans that are currently subject to 
        direct commercial harvest; and
Whereas there are unique regions of the world's seas which serve as important 
        feeding grounds for many species of whales, and where the impacts of 
        environmental threats are unknown: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the United States policy should promote the 
        conservation and protection of whale, dolphin, and porpoise 
        populations;
            (2) the United States should remain opposed to any 
        resumption of commercial whaling, and should work toward a 
        moratorium on the direct commercial harvest of dolphins and 
        porpoises;
            (3) the United States should work to strengthen the 
        International Whaling Commission by reaffirming its competence 
        to regulate direct commercial harvest of small cetaceans and 
        should encourage the Commission to consider the expertise of 
        its Scientific Committee;
            (4) the United States should support the establishment of 
        appropriate international sanctuaries where whaling is 
        prohibited; and
            (5) in promoting the conservation and protection of the 
        world's whale populations, the United States should make the 
        fullest use of diplomatic channels, appropriate domestic and 
        international law, and all other available means.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 16, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Carlton Cadle, Defendant.

County Court, Monroe County,

April 10, 1958.

*George Hoffenberg*for defendant.

*Harry L. Rosenthal, District Attorney (Leon N. Armer*of counsel), for plaintiff.

*852George D. Ogden, J.

By an indictment containing two counts the Grand Jury of the County of Monroe accused the defendant of contriving, drawing and assisting in a lottery, a felony, and in offering property for disposal dependent upon the drawing of any lottery, a misdemeanor. Both the felony and the misdemeanor are alleged in the indictment to have occurred March 11, 1958, in the city of Rochester, Monroe County, New York.

Defendant’s demurrer is directed to both counts. Nowhere in the indictment is it alleged that those participants who signed for the receipt of folding chairs, for which receipt each paid the sum of $1 and was immediately issued such chair, were to use the same in connection with any lottery or other scheme contrived by the defendant; in other words, nowhere in the indictment is it alleged that the defendant demanded or received any sum of money or other consideration for participation in the game which followed.

The indictment is fatal in this respect, for the second count fails if the first count is insufficient. As was said in *People*v. *Burns*(304 N. Y. 380, 382): ‘ ‘ requisite [allegation] is lacking that participants in the game upon which the indictment is based were ‘ persons who have paid * * * consideration for the chance ’ so as to constitute a lottery within the meaning of section 1370 of the Penal Law *(People*v. *Shafer,*273 N. Y. 475).”

The demurrer is allowed (Code Grim. Pro., § 326).

Submit order.
TS-FC12NT 

Attachment No. 002 

PMN Page 4a Section I.B.1.e.2 & .3 (Nature of Reaction) 

PMN Pages 8/8a Section II.A.1.d (Manufacturing Process Description) 

- 1 - 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 ** COMPANY SANITIZED **
 

TS-FC12NT 

Attachment No. 002 

PMN Page 4a Section I.B.1.e.2 & .3 (Nature of Reaction) 

PMN Pages 8/8a Section II.A.1.d (Manufacturing Process Description) 

- 2 - 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ** COMPANY SANITIZED **
 

TS-FC12NT 

Attachment No. 002 

PMN Page 4a Section I.B.1.e.2 & .3 (Nature of Reaction) 

PMN Pages 8/8a Section II.A.1.d (Manufacturing Process Description) 

- 3 - 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 



 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 ** COMPANY SANITIZED **