alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00029-Z-BR-1

§

JACOB CASSELBERRY §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

JACOB CASSELBERRY, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997), has 

appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment. After 

cautioning and examining JACOB CASSELBERRY under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I 

determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of 

guilty be accepted, and that JACOB CASSELBERRY be adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(1) -

TRANSPORTATION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of 

the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: June 21, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00029-Z-BR Document 32 Filed 06/21/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 68
<PAGE>

March 11, 1998

STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
Mr. Michael H. Mehr
1293 Berry Bridge Road
Eagan MN 55123

Dear Michael

I have pleasure inviting you to join Adaytum Software in the position of
Controller, subject to a service agreement to be made available shortly.

Your annual salary will commence at $110,000, payable bi-monthly, and will be
subject to review annually on January I, 1999. You will also have the
opportunity to earn a maximum bonus of $10,000, which will be tied to objectives
to be agreed by May 30th. As part of the senior Executive team, you will be
eligible to participate in the share option scheme. Your vacation entitlement is
twenty-five days per calendar year and is pro rata accordingly. This entitlement
is reduced by any sick days taken during the year.

Please return to us a letter confirming your acceptance of this offer
(attached). Full details of our employee benefits will be made available you in
the first week of your employment. Any questions relating to this letter or
benefits can a directed to me.

Finally, may I say I am delighted that you will be joining us and we look
forward to seeing you on Monday April 13, 1998.

Yours sincerely

/s/ J. D. Guy Haddleton
----------------------------
Guy Haddleton
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 237 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

<DOC>

        H.Con.Res.237
                                                   Agreed to May 3, 1994

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' MEMORIAL 
SERVICE.
    The National Fraternal Order of Police and its auxiliary shall be 
permitted to sponsor a public event, the 13th annual National Peace 
Officers' Memorial Service, on the Capitol grounds on May 15, 1994, or 
on such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and 
the President pro tempore of the Senate may jointly designate, in order 
to honor the 151 law enforcement officers who died in the line of duty 
during 1993.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--The event authorized to be conducted on the 
Capitol grounds under section 1 shall be free of admission charge to 
the public and arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress, 
under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and 
the Capitol Police Board.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The National Fraternal Order of 
Police and its auxiliary shall assume full responsibility for all 
expenses and liabilities incident to all activities associated with the 
event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    (a) Structures and Equipment.--Subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, the National Fraternal Order of Police and 
its auxiliary are authorized to erect upon the Capitol grounds such 
stage, sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event authorized to be conducted 
on the Capitol grounds under section 1.
    (b) Additional Arrangements.--The Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board are authorized to make any such additional 
arrangements as may be required to carry out the event.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|U.S. Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|U.S. Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 301    | 258    | 247    | 223    | 216    | 219    | 213    | 204   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 205    | 202    | 199    | 187    | 179    | 175    | NA     | 164    | NA     | 159   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 158    | 155    | 153    | 149    | 149    | 148    | 149    | 149    | 150    | 150   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 148    | 148    | 144    | 143    | 142    | 140    | 141    | 141    | 135    | 135   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 135    | 129    | 130    | 129    | 132    |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128555 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128555 COA: 258717 Macomb CC: 02-002811-FC RONALD LEE CORBIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the March 1, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan , lv gtd 472 Mich 881 (2005).

t1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28768]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AZ-910-0777-26-241A]


State of Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION:  Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Arizona Resource 
Advisory Council (RAC). The meeting will be held on December 12, in 
Phoenix, Arizona. The RAC meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and will 
conclude at approximately 4:00 p.m. The agenda items to be covered 
include the review of the October 4, 2000 meeting minutes; BLM State 
Director's Update on legislation, regulations, and statewide planning 
efforts; Election of RAC Chair and Vice Chair; Draft National Off-
Highway Vehicle Use Strategy Review and Discussion; Update on National 
Landscape Conservation System in Arizona, Report on 2001 
Appropriations, Funding Allocation, and Arizona BLM Priorities; Update 
of State-Federal Land Exchange Agreement; Update on Las Cienegas 
National Conservation Area Legislation and Other Proposed Special Area 
Designations; Update Proposed Field Office Rangeland Resource Teams; 
Reports from BLM Field Office Managers; Reports by the Standards and 
Guidelines, Recreation and Public Relations, Wild Horse and Burro 
Working Groups; Reports from RAC members; and Discussion of future 
meetings. A public comment period will be provided at 11:30 a.m. on 
December 12, 2000, for any interested publics who wish to address the 
Council.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Stevens, Bureau of Land 
Management, Arizona State Office, 222 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, 
Arizona 85004-2203, (602) 417-9215.

Denise P. Merdith,
Arizona State Director.
[FR Doc. 00-28768 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-M
Informal Comments of the National Institute for Occ upational Safety and Health on the

Draft Toxicological Review of 1,2,4- and 1,3,5-Trimethylb enzene

for Interagency Science Consultation

February 2, 2012

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) reviewed a portion of Table 2 (“Other Agency and International Assessments”) in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) January 2012 Interagency Science Consultation draft Toxicological Review of 1,2,4- Trimethylbenzene and 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene prepared in support of summary information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Oth er parts of the draft were not reviewed.

Comments about Table 2 (page 21):

1) change agency name to “National Institute for Oc cupational Safety and Health”.

2) the “Inhalation Value” row for NIOSH states “ref erence not provided” with regard to the study that provided the basis for the NIOSH Recomme nded Exposure Limit (REL). The draft

review cites “NIOSH 1992” as the source. The histo rical basis for the REL is NIOSH testimony to the Occupational Safety and Health Administratio n (OSHA) on OSHA’s proposed rule on Air Contaminants, presented at the OSHA informal public hearing August 1, 1988 [NIOSH1988]. NIOSH concurred with the PEL proposed by OSHA for t rimethylbenzene (CAS 25551-13-7). OSHA cited a study published in 1957 by Battig, Gra ndjean, and Turrian http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/pel88/25551-13.html ]. The EPA draft cites and provides a link to Battig et al. 1956, very likely the same work. The NIOSH RELs for 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene are in the NIOSH Pocket Guid e to chemical hazards (NPG): http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/pel88/25551-13.html Because it provides a separate entry for each of those isomers, it may be preferable to cite the NPG in addition to NIOSH 1992 (i.e., NIOSH Recommendations for Occupational Safety and Health: compendium of policy documents and statements.)

3) Suggest adding international limits for Europea n countries (only United States and Ontario limits are listed in Table 2.)

References

NIOSH [1988]. Testimony of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health on the Occupational Safety and Health Administratio n's proposed rule on air contaminants, 29 CFR Part 1910, OSHA Docket No. H–020. Presented at the OSHA informal public hearing, August 1, 1988. NIOSH policy statements. Cincinnati , OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
Order – Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JORDAN WILLIAMS, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-787-L-BK

§

LOCAL ENTITIES, §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

On September 25, 2022, the United States Magistrate Judge entered the Findings, 

Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 29) (“Report”), 

recommending that the court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), dismiss with prejudice as 

frivolous this action by Plaintiff. No objections to the Report were filed or received as of the date 

of this order, and the deadline for objections has expired.

Having considered the pleadings, Report, file, and record in this case, the court determines 

that the magistrate judge’s findings and conclusions are correct, and accepts them as those of the 

court. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), the court dismisses with prejudice

this action by Plaintiff as frivolous. 

The court prospectively certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good 

faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). In support of this certification, the 

court accepts and incorporates by reference the Report. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 

and n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the Report, the court finds that any appeal of this action would 

present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. See Howard v. King, 

707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Plaintiff, however, may challenge this finding pursuant to

Case 3:22-cv-00787-L-BK Document 31 Filed 10/31/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 927
Order – Page 2

Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F. 3d 197 (5th Cir. 1997), by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma 

pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 

within 30 days of this order. 

It is so ordered this 31st day of October, 2022.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-00787-L-BK Document 31 Filed 10/31/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 928
|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                         
|                                                                                      
|Gulf Coast (PADD 3) Refinery Shell Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|Gulf Coast (PADD 3) Refinery Shell Storage Capacity as of January 1 (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 347,551 | 410,224 | 410,489 | 405,084 | 427,968 | 418,311 | 426,069 | 427,601
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 425,430 | 435,795 | 429,059 | 427,121 | 425,008 | 406,093 | NA      | 397,116 | NA      | 387,009
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 368,486 | 364,909 | 366,406 | 363,515 | 356,498 | 371,812 | 365,671 | 361,034 | 352,910 | 350,141
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 336,364 | --      | --      | --      | --      | --      | --      | --      | --      | --     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --      | --      | --      | --      | --      |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|U.S. Foreign Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Tanker (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|U.S. Foreign Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Tanker (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           | 1,121,517 | 746,321   | 661,873   | 790,759   | 597,693   | 1,085,549 | 1,152,532 | 1,259,535 | 1,407,635
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,381,512 | 1,369,021 | 1,421,731 | 1,583,775 | 1,556,745 | NA        | 1,813,976 | NA        | 2,121,744 | 2,128,417
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,015,382 | 2,103,334 | 2,098,641 | 2,260,078 | 2,385,427 | 2,367,601 | 2,328,688 | 2,309,922 | 2,212,355 | 2,113,170
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,148,100 | 2,089,289 | 1,899,227 | 1,693,488 | 1,520,438 | 1,431,889 | 1,540,168 | 1,514,879 | 1,439,485 | 1,048,423
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 805,200   | 806,450   | 869,723   | 899,325   |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025