alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 275

Waiving the requirement in section 132 of the Legislative Reorganization

Act of 1946 that the Congress adjourn sine die not later than July

31 of each year.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 29, 1994

Mr. MOAKLEY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Waiving the requirement in section 132 of the Legislative

Reorganization Act of 1946 that the Congress adjourn

sine die not later than July 31 of each year.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, notwithstanding the provisions of sec3 tion 132(a)(1) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of

4 1946 (2 U.S.C. 198), the House of Representatives and

5 the Senate shall not adjourn for a period in excess of three

6 days, or adjourn sine die, until both Houses of Congress

7 have adopted a concurrent resolution providing either for
2

HCON 275 ATH

1 an adjournment (in excess of three days) to a day certain

2 or for adjournment sine die.

Æ
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Credit Suisse First BostonMortgage Securities Corp. 

11 MADISON AVE

NEW YORK, New York 10010-3643

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., CommercialMortgage  Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C1

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of March 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
Motion to withdraw granted, motions for to extend time to file brief granted, 

motion to dismiss denied, and Corrected Order filed January 12, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00506-CV

RYAN KINNEAR, Appellant

V.

JENNIFER UMANZOR, Appellee

On Appeal from the 245th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-45623

ORDER

Before the court is a motion to withdraw as counsel filed December 12, 2022. 

Appellant’s counsels, Timothy A. Hootman and Joshua R. Stein, seek to withdraw 

from their representation in this appeal. Having considered the motion, the court 

grants the motion.

Also before the court are original and amended motions to extend time for 

appellant to file his brief, which altogether seek an extension of time to January 20, 
2

2023 based partly on appellant seeking to proceed without his recent counsels in this 

appeal. The court grants these motions and instructs appellant to file his brief no 

later than January 20, 2023.

The final motion before this court is a motion filed by appellee seeking to 

dismiss this appeal, or alternatively affirm the appealed judgment due to appellant 

not yet having filed his brief. This motion is denied.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Wilson.
AFS

- 13

- 038

- E December 5, 2012

Exemption No. 6034 I

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2000

- 8428

Mr. David Stape

Manager

– Regulatory Compliance

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Post Office Box 20706

Atlanta , GA 30320

- 6001

Dear Mr. Stape :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted you r petition to extend Exemption

No. 6034, as amended . It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated Oct ober 25, 2012 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

on behalf of Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta ) for an extension of Exemption No. 6034, as

amended. That exemption from §§ 25.791(a) and 121.317(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal

Regulations (14 CFR) allows Delta to operate its McDonnell Douglas MD

- 90 aircraft with

“No Smoking” signs that are always illuminated, provided Delta operates those aircraft in a

manner that continues to prohibit smoking on board the affected aircraft at all times.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a s ummary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the reques ted extension of the exemption would not set a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be det rimental to Delta

.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification f or th e issuance of Exemption No. 6034, as

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore,

under the authority provide d by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator

has delegated to me, I grant y our petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termin ation date of Exemption No. 6034, as amended, to

February 28, 201 5

, unless sooner su perseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen

Director, Flight Standards Ser vice
#### McQUEEN v. STATE.

No. 26303.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 11, 1953.

• No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

*877George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., oí Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding'Judge'.

The conviction is for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry area. The penalty assessed is á fine of $150.

The complaint and information, as well as all other matters of procedure, appear to be regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or’ bills of exception; In the ábsence' thereof, nothing is brought forward for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 171 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 171

  Concerning the heroic rescue of Danish Jews in World War II by the 
                             Danish people.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 1993

 Mr. Deutsch submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Concerning the heroic rescue of Danish Jews in World War II by the 
                             Danish people.

Whereas in the fall of 1943 the Nazis occupied Denmark and issued orders that 
        the Danes deport all Danish Jews to concentration camps where they would 
        eventually be exterminated;
Whereas the Danish people as a result of the Nazi mandate began a mission of 
        mercy on October 1, 1943, smuggling Jews across the Oresund Strait to 
        neutral Sweden via small boats and fishing cutters;
Whereas the Danish rescuers unselfishly risked their own lives avoiding German 
        patrols during the more than 2-month rescue operations; and
Whereas approximately 90 percent of the Danish Jews were saved from certain 
        death at the hands of the Nazis by the sheer courage and compassion 
        demonstrated by the Danes: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) recognizes and commemorates the bravery and valor of 
        those Danes who participated in the 1943 rescue operations that 
        saved the lives of 7,300 Jews who would otherwise have perished 
        in Nazi concentration camps; and
            (2) declares that the world owes a great debt to these 
        Danes who did not turn a blind eye on the dangers that faced 
        Jews under Nazi occupation.

                                 <all>
```
October 30, 2014

Mr. Lloyd Hetrick

HR Manager/Drug Alcohol Program Manager

Hetrick Air Services

1930 Airport Road

Lawrence, KS 66044

Dear Mr. Hetrick:

This is in response to your October 10, 2014 letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2013-

0032) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Hetrick Air 

Services, Inc. (HAS) for an extension of its exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow HAS to cover its

safety-sensitive employees under one testing program.

On July 15, 2013, the FAA published the Combined Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs 

final rule (78 FR 41999) relating to air carrier operators and commuter or on-demand 

operators that also conduct commercial air tour operations to combine the drug and alcohol 

testing required for each operation into one testing program. A copy of this rule change is 

enclosed for your information.

Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new rule, we will take no further action 

on your petition. If you have any questions, please contact the FAA’s Drug Abatement 

Division at (202) 267-8442 or drugabatement@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Thuy Cooper

Acting Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

ROBERT “BOB” ROSS AND EUGENIO 

VARGAS 

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, 

v. 

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL 

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, et al., 

Defendants/Counterclaim 

Plaintiffs. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Civil Action No. 4:22-CV-343-Y 

Consolidated with 

Civil No. 4:22-CV-430-Y 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE 

 TO FILE RESPONSES TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Partially Agreed Motion to Extend Deadline to File 

Responses to Motions for Summary Judgment (doc. 240). After review of the motion, the Court 

concludes that it should be, and it is hereby, GRANTED. The deadline for the parties to respond 

to the pending summary-judgment motions is EXTENDED until May 24, 2024. 

SIGNED May 16, 2024. 

TERRY R. MEANS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Solo Page 

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 241 Filed 05/16/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 7636
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2815]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program, 
Scientific Advisory Board

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee meeting:
    Date of Meeting: March 14, 2000 from 1000 to 1700 and March 15, 
2000 from 0830 to 1210.
    Place: 1777 North Kent Street, 14th Floor, Arlington, VA 22209.
    Matters to be Considered: Research and Development proposals and 
continuing projects requesting Strategic Environmental Research and 
Development Program funds in excess of $1M will be reviewed.
    This meeting is open to the public. Any interested person may 
attend, appear before, or file statements with the Scientific Advisory 
Board at the time and in the manner permitted by the Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Ms. Veronica Rice, SERDP Program 
Office, 901 North Stuart Street, Suite 303, Arlington, VA or by 
telephone at (703) 696-2119.

    Dated: February 2, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 00-2815 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

ABILINE DIVISION 

FAIR OAKS APARTMENTS, LLC § 

Plaintiff, § 

§ 

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:22-cv-00065 

§ 

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL § 

INSURANCE COMPANY § 

Defendant. § 

INDEX OF FILINGS 

Defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company gives notice that the following items 

are being filed with its Notice of Removal in the above-referenced action: 

1. Notice of Removal with the following exhibits attached: 

A. Plaintiff’s Original Petition with citation and attachments; 

B. Defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company’s Original Answer; 

2. Index of Filings; 

3. Civil Cover Sheet; 

4. Supplement Civil Cover Sheet; and 

5. Certificate of Interested Parties. 

(Signatures on following page.) 

Case 1:22-cv-00065-BU Document 1-3 Filed 05/17/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 45
2 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Patrick M. Kemp 

Patrick M. Kemp 

Texas Bar No. 24043751 

pkemp@smsm.com 

Robert G. Wall 

Texas Bar No. 24072411 

rwall@smsm.com 

Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney 

100 Congress Avenue, Suite 800 

Austin, Texas 78701 

(512) 476-7834 

(512) 476-7832 – Facsimile 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument has been served 

electronically via CM/ECF and Certified Mail this the 17th day of May, 2022 to: 

Shaun W. Hodge # 9414 7266 9904 2137 9628 29 

Jahan V. Guram 

The Hodge Law Firm, PLLC 

1301 Market Street 

Galveston, Texas 77550 

shodge@hodgefirm.com 

jguram@hodgefirm.com 

/s/ Patrick M. Kemp 

Patrick M. Kemp 

Case 1:22-cv-00065-BU Document 1-3 Filed 05/17/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 46
MINISTRY OF TRAFFIC, TRANSPORT AND URBAN PLANNING CURA<;AO CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY

Date January 3Q<h, 2015 Your Letter dated: Subject: Contact Person Gijs Winters Your Reference: Operalion of7'h freedom charter flights
Dear Sirs, Error! Auto Text entry not defined. U.S. Department ofTransportation Office of International Aviation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 USA E-mail gwinters.ccaa@gmail.com Ourreference CURCW/13/ Page(s) 1/1

Theundersigned, Director General ofthe

**Cura~ao** Civil Aviation Authority, hereby confirms that

**Cura~ao** will consider applications byU.S. carriers for the approval to operate charter flights to and from

**Cura~ao** in accordance with the provisions of the Air Transport Agreementbetween the United States ofAmerica and the Kingdom ofthe Netherlands in respect ofCura<;ao, relating to Air Transportbetween Cura<;ao and the United States of America, initialed on April25, 2014. Cura<;ao will in addition grant approvalfor designated U.S. carriers to operate 7th freedom charterflights on the understanding that the United States would grant similar rights to designated Cura<;ao carriers in accordance with the provisions ofthe above mentioned Air Transport Agreementfor the period from January 22nd, 2015 toJuly 21 51, 2015. Yours sincerely,

• J Oscar L. Derby 

# 7 Director General Cura<;ao Civil Aviation Authority.

Edifisio Siegfried Francisco, Seru Mahuma z/n 

### I Willemstad,

**Cura~ao** 

### I T. (5999) 839-3319 

### I F. (5999) 868-9924 

### I civilair®gobiernu.cw
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 3350 Unemployed Number in thousands 25 to 34 years 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU03000089Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Unemployment Level - 25-34 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:08:26 PM)
| (logo) Prudential

  | Prudential Asset Resources,  Inc.

 

**Prudential Mortgage  Capital Company**

2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500  Dallas, TX 75201

Tel 877-937-4500

  |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation Commercial Mortgage ServicingMAC D1086550 South Tryon Street, 14th FloorCharlotte, North Carolina 28202Attention: Asset Manager

RE:**WFCM 2015-C27**Period:**January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod")**

**Annual Compliance Statement**I, Timothy E. Steward, in my capacity as President and Managing Director ofPrudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify withregard to the Company's role as Primary Servicer under the Primary ServicingAgreement, (the "Agreement") dated as of March 1, 2015 pertaining tothe above-referenced certificates, that:(i) a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during theperiod noted above, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreementduring the reporting period has been made under my supervision, and(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout the reportingperiod.

 

 

Effective as of 2/22/2017

/s/ Timothy E. StewardTimothy E. StewardPresident and Managing DirectorPrudential Asset Resources, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6326

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CARLOS WOODS,

Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:07-cr-00127-WDQ-1) 

Submitted: June 25, 2010 Decided: July 2, 2010

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Carlos Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Joseph Leotta, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Carlos Woods appeals the district court’s order 

denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for a new trial. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Woods, No. 1:07-cr-00127-WDQ-1 (D. Md. Feb. 19, 2010). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

LUBBOCK DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

v. 

CURTIS JAMES JOHNSON 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA 

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

This case has been referred by the United States district judge to the undersigned 

for the taking of a guilty plea. The parties have consented to appear before a United States 

magistrate judge for these purposes. This Report and Recommendation on Plea is submitted 

to the court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). 

The defendant appeared with counsel before the undersigned United States 

magistrate judge, who addressed the defendant personally in open court and informed the 

defendant of, and determined that the defendant understood, the admonitions contained in 

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

The defendant pleaded guilty (under a written plea bargain agreement with the 

government) to Count One of the Superseding Information, charging defendant with a 

violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(l), 924(a)(2), that is, Convicted Felon in Possession of a 

Firearm. After examining Defendant under oath the undersigned magistrate judge finds 

the following: 

1. Defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing 

to enter this guilty plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final 

approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge; 

_ 

Case 5:22-cr-00027-H-BQ Document 25 Filed 05/13/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 43
l 

2. Defendant fully understands the nature of the charges (including each 

essential element of the offense(s) charged) and penalties; 

3. Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea 

agreement supplement; 

4. Defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes 

to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right 

to appear before a United States district judge; 

5. Defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily; 

6. Defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; 

7. There is a factual basis for this plea; and 

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of 

guilty. 

Although I have conducted these proceedings and recommend acceptance of 

Defendant's plea of guilty, the United States district judge has the power to review my 

actions and possesses final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if 

Defendant has any objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he 

is required to make those known to the United States district judge within fourteen (14) 

days of today. 

Based on the above, I recommend that Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted, that 

Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. 

Signed May 13, 2022. 

'JR. 

STRATE JUDGE 

Case 5:22-cr-00027-H-BQ Document 25 Filed 05/13/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 44