alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DAVILA v. STATE.

No. 25097.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 14, 1951.

Rehearing Denied April 11, 1951.

F. G. Garza, Mercedes, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to fifteen years in the penitentiary.

When this case was submitted our attention was called to the failure of the District Clerk to note the filing date of the statement of facts. Permission was given to appellant’s counsel to secure a certificate- from the clerk showing the filing date. We have withheld our opinion for such certificate.

An examination of the record shows that notice of appeal was given in this case on February 23, 1950. At that time the court entered an order granting ninety days to file bills of exception and statement of facts. This is all the time tlie District Judge has power to grant. It is. noted, however,' that on May 19th he granted thirty days additional time, from and after May 24th. On June 20th he granted an extension to July 24th. On July 23rd he extended the time to August 24th.' On August 24th an order was entered extending the time to September 20th.

The transcript shows the filing date of the bills of exception to be September 20, 1950. The reporter’s certificate to the statement of facts is dated September 1, 1950, while the attorneys and the judge entered their approval on the 20th day of September, 1950. It is immaterial that the District Clerk did not place his filing date on the statement of facts because he had no authority to file same after the ninety days originally allowed from February 23rd.

In;the state of the record we cannot consider the statement of facts or" bills of exception and the record, as it comes to us, presents nothing for our review. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial.court is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 81 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 81

Authorizing the 1993 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the 
                            Capitol Grounds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 1993

Mr. Traficant submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the 1993 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the 
                            Capitol Grounds.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL OLYMPICS TORCH RELAY 
              THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    On May 27, 1993, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may 
designate jointly, the 1993 Special Olympics Torch Relay may be run 
through the Capitol Grounds, as part of the journey of the Special 
Olympics torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics summer 
games at Gallaudet University in the District of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such action as may be necessary 
to carry out section 1.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event authorized by section 1.

                                 <all>
```
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PR ECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Margaret Stroud and D5 Citizens Ensuring the Implementation of the Refer endum, Inc., Respondents,

v.

Kim Murphy, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-202407

Appeal from Richland County L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge

Mem orandum Opinion No. 2013-MO-017 Heard May 14, 2013 – Filed June 12, 2013

REVERSED AND REMANDED

Robert Guild, of Columbia, Katie R. Parham, of The Parham Law Firm, of Irmo, and Jerry Jay Bender, of Baker, Ravenel & Bender, LLP, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Todd R. Ellis, of Law Office of Todd Ellis, P.A., of Irmo, for Respondents.

Kenneth L. Childs, John Marshall Reagle, and Tyler Ryan Turner, of Childs a nd Halligan, P.A., of Columbia,for Amicus Curiae, School District Five of Lexington and Richland Counties, Scott Thomas Price, of Columbia, for Amicus Curiae, South Car olina School Boards
Association.

PER CURIAM: Margaret Stroud, and D5 Citizens Ensuring the Implementation of the Referendum, Inc. file d this action alleging abuse of process by Kim Murphy, a member of the Distri ct 5 school board, and requesting an injunction preventing her from challenging or appealing ac tions related to permits for construction projects authorized by th e school district and funded by the 2008 Referendum. Murphy moved to dismiss, a nd the circuit court denied her motion and issued a temporary restraining order.

We reverse pursuant to Rule 220( b)(1), SCACR, and the following
authorities: ATC S., Inc. v. Charleston Cnty. , 380 S.C. 191, 198, 669 S.E.2d 337, 341 (2008) (internal citations omitted) ("[A] taxpayer lacks standing when he suffers in some indefinite way in common with people generally.") Sea Pines Ass'n for the Prot. of Wildlife, Inc. v. S.C. Dep't of Natural Res. , 345 S.C. 594, 600, 550 S.E.2d 287, 291 (2001) (interna l citations omitted) (noting that to have standing a party must have a personal stake in the subject matter of the lawsuit and have a "real, material, or substantial interest in the subject matter of the action, as opposed to one who has only a nominal or t echnical interest in the action"); Id. at 601, 550 S.E.2d at 291 (quoting Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 560–61 (1992)) (internal quotations omitted) ("In order to establish standing, a party must satisfy three elements. First, the plainti ff must have suffered an injury in fact—an invasion of a legally protected interest whic h is (a) concrete and particularized, and (b) actual or imminent, not conject ural or hypothetical.").

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for dismissal by the circuit court.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY , KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ.,

concur.
#### Ex parte NEWSOM.

No. 25257.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 28, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George' P. Blackburn,’ 'State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES) Presiding Judge.

Relator.was convicted in Johnson County for the possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area and by a jury fined the sum of $400.00 and given 60 days in jail.

This cause was appealed to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas and by such court affirmed as our Cause No. 24,955, on January 17, 1951, and our mandate was issued thereunder. Thereafter, by virtue of Art. 137, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., .relator sued out this writ of habeas corpus before the District Judge of Johnson County alleging that he was confined under'such mandate in the county jail o’f such county and that such confinement was endangering his health, he being afflicted with tuberculosis, and that such confinement would probably cause him to lose his life. This issue was joined and the ‘testimony of two doctors was taken therein. It appears from such testimony that the contemplated confinement in such jail would probably benefit rather than be detrimental to relator’s health. It seems that the- confinement contemplated by the Sheriff of that county would not endanger relator’s health as called for in Art. 137, supra, but would probably be beneficial thereto.

Under the testimony in tbis cause, we do not think that the relator’ is entitled to any relief under the provisions of Art. 137, supra. See Ex parte Lynch, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 239, 200 S.W.2d 828; Thomas v. State, 40 Tex. 6; Ex parte Johnson, 60 Tex.Cr.R. 50, 131 S.W. 316, 31 L.R.A.,N.S., 916.

• Therefore, the order remanding relator to the custody of the sheriff is affirmed.
|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                         
|                                                                                      
|West Coast (PADD 5) Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|West Coast (PADD 5) Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 59     | 56     | 57     | 51     | 51     | 54     | 50     | 49    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 50     | 50     | 47     | 45     | 44     | 43     | NA     | 41     | NA     | 40    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 40     | 39     | 38     | 36     | 36     | 36     | 36     | 36     | 36     | 34    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 34     | 34     | 32     | 32     | 32     | 31     | 31     | 31     | 29     | 27    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 27     | 26     | 27     | 26     | 26     |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
#### HAWKINS et al. v. STATE.

No. 26177.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 28, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The six appellants were jointly charged, tried, and convicted for a violation of Art. 902, Vernon’s P.C., which makes unlawful the hunting at night of wild deer by the aid of artificial lights. . Each of the appellants, except Elbert A. Hawkins, received punishment of a fine of $100 and-30 days in jail; Hawkins was assessed a fine of $200 and 30 days in jail.

It appears that about 3:00 o’clock, a. m., on August 22, 1952, two game wardens saw ah automobile come to a .halt on a public road. Two artificial lights from the car shone upon a deer in a pasture by the side of the road, and a shot was fired at the deer by someone in the car. The wardens were unable to overtake the car and arrest *876the occupants thereof. By way of radio, they communicated With other peace officers who, from the description given, apprehended and arrested the six appellants, occupants of the car. Appellant Hawkins was the driver of the automobile.

' All the appellants were taken before the comity judge, before whom’each appellant entered a plea of guilty to , the offense charged and waived a trial by,jury. Judgment was then pronounced.

• Motions for new trial by each of the appellants -Vvere filed the following day, based chiefly upon the contention that the facts were insufficient to support the conviction.

When appellants entered the pleas of guilty, all the material averments in the information were admitted. Ex parte Clinnard, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 460, 169 S.W.2d 181; Hinojosa v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 301, 206 S.W.2d 1011.

The fact that the state introduced evidence to show guilt did not change the rule stated.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
# Contents

Data 1

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngwhhdd.htm

infoctr@eia.doe.gov

# Data 1

Back to Contents
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CHERYL L SPIVEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

NFN NLN

Dallas Lawyer,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No.3:22-CV-00923-X-BT

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a 

recommendation in this case. [Doc. No. 6]. No objections were filed. The District 

Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain 

error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Spivey is WARNED that 

if she continues to file frivolous pro se cases in this Court, sanctions and/or a filing 

bar may be imposed

IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of July 2022.

____________________________________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00923-X-BT Document 7 Filed 07/12/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 37
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 68

Concerning the approximately 190 children and youths at the Romanian

Institution for the Unsalvageables at Sighetu Marmatiei who are in

desperate need of humanitarian assistance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 23, 1993

Mr. POMBO (for himself, Mr. MANZULLO, and Mr. DIAZ-BALART) submitted

the following concurrent resolution; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Foreign Affairs and the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning the approximately 190 children and youths at

the Romanian Institution for the Unsalvageables at

Sighetu Marmatiei who are in desperate need of humanitarian assistance.

Whereas there are approximately 190 children and youths at

the Romanian Institution for the Unsalvageables at

Sighetu Marmatiei who are in desperate need of humanitarian assistance, including proper medical attention and

treatment;

Whereas a private, nonprofit organization known as the

Chalcedon Foundation of Vallecito, California, in coordination with EPIC Healthcare Group of Dallas, Texas,

has committed to facilitating such assistance through the
2

•HCON 68 IH

provision of medical attention and treatment and housing

for such children and youths in the United States;

Whereas the Chalcedon Foundation has guaranteed that once

these children and youths arrive in the United States

they will not become a public charge or burden on the

taxpayer; and

Whereas increased cooperation among the United States Government, the Government of Romania, and interested individuals and humanitarian organizations is needed if

these children and youths are to be saved: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress calls upon—

3 (1) the Government of Romania to allow the

4 approximately 190 children and youths at the Roma5 nian Institution for the Unsalvageables at Sighetu

6 Marmatiei to come to the United States for humani7 tarian assistance, including proper medical attention

8 and treatment; and

9 (2) the Secretary of State to facilitate this proc10 ess by granting these children and youths entry into

11 the United States with the immediacy that their in12 tolerable situation demands.

Æ
Final Judgment of Forfeiture – Page 1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

APPROXIMATELY $1,044,080 SEIZED 

FROM A BINANCE ACCOUNT IN THE 

NAME OF “EVEGNII POLIANIN” 

 Defendant in rem. 

NO. 3:22-CV-577-N 

DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE 

The Court issues these Judgments pursuant to its Order, filed earlier today. 

Accordingly it is, hereby, ordered, adjudged and decreed that: 

1. A default judgment is entered against any right, title, and interest in the 

Defendant Property for all the following known and unknown individuals: 

a. Yevgeniy Igorevich Polyanin, a/k/a Evgeniy Polyanin, a/k/a Evegnii 

Igorevich Polianin 

2. A final judgment is entered forfeiting all right, title, and interest in the 

following property to the United States: 

a. Approximately $1,044,080 seized from a Binance account in the 

name of “Evegnii Polianin” 

Case 3:22-cv-00577-N Document 20 Filed 11/06/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 49
Final Judgment of Forfeiture – Page 2 

3. The Attorney General, or his designee, is authorized to dispose of the 

forfeited property in accordance with law. 

 Signed this 6th day of November 2023. 

 

 

DAVID N. GODBEY 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cv-00577-N Document 20 Filed 11/06/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 50
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 29 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 29

  Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the United States 
             Customs Child Pornography and Protection Unit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 1993

  Mr. Lewis of Florida submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the United States 
             Customs Child Pornography and Protection Unit.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the protection of our Nation's children from 
        exploitation must remain of the highest priority for the United 
        States Government;
            (2) as a result of the integration of the United States 
        Customs Child Pornography and Protection Unit into a larger 
        division in February, 1991, employee hours spent investigating 
        child pornography from 1990 to 1992 were cut to barely one 
        fourth of the previous level, and arrests on child pornography 
        charges by United States Customs have been nearly halved from 
        110 to 57 and convictions were reduced from 103 to 69;
            (3) the United States Customs Service should reestablish a 
        unit specifically tasked with enforcing laws prohibiting child 
        exploitation and pornography, and prosecuting violators of 
        those laws; and
            (4) the efforts of this reestablished unit, as measured by 
        employee hours, arrests, and convictions, should equal or 
        exceed those of the United States Customs Child Pornography and 
        Protection Unit in fiscal 1990.

                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# Previously Announced Date and Time: 

Thursday, November 9, 2000, 10 a.m., meeting open to the public.

This meeting was cancelled.

# Date & Time:

Tuesday, November 14, 2000 at 10 a.m.

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

This meeting will be closed to the public. 

# Items to be discussed:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. 

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# Date & Time:

Thursday, November 16, 2000 at 10 a.m.

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# Status:

This meeting will be open to the public. 

# Items to be discussed:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2000-24: Alaska Democratic Party by counsel, Neil Reiff.

Final Rules and Explanation and Justification on General Public Political Communications Coordinated with Candidates, and Independent Expenditures.

Administrative Matters.

      ( print page 67010)    

# Person to contact for information:

Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-28841  Filed 11-6-00; 2:47 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Exhibit 35.9


















RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM
2015-CCRE23 Mortgage Trust 
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-CCRE23



Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2015
(the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator
("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):



(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period
and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and



(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review,
Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.







February 29, 2016







|               |                    
|-------------- | -------------------
|BRIAN SMITH    | Jeffrey Coletta    
|Vice President | Assistant Secretary
EXHIBIT A

(Provisionally Filed Under Seal)

Case 3:22-cv-00758-N Document 1-1 Filed 04/04/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 9