alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
67476 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS

Scientific Review and Evaluation

Board for Health Services Research

and Development Service, Notice of

Meeting

The Department of Veterans Affairs,

Veterans Health Administration, gives

notice under Public Law 92–463, that a

meeting of the Nursing Research

Initiative Subcommittee of the Scientific

Review and Evaluation Board for Health

Services Research and Development

Service will be held at the Washington

Plaza Hotel, 10 Thomas Circle, NW,

Washington, DC 20005, on March 6,

2001. On March 6, 2001, the meeting

will convene from 8 a.m. until 5 p.m.

The purpose of the meeting is to review

research and development applications

concerned with the measurement and

evaluation of health care services and

with testing new methods of health care

delivery and management. Applications

are reviewed for scientific and technical

merit. Recommendations regarding

funding are prepared for the Chief

Research and Development Officer.

This meeting will be open to the

public at the start of the March 6 session

for approximately one-half hour to cover

administrative matters and to discuss

the general status of the program. The

closed portion of the meeting involves

discussion, examination, reference to,

and oral review of staff and consultant

critiques of research protocols and

similar documents. During this portion

of the meeting, discussion and

recommendations will include

qualifications of the personnel

conducting the studies (the disclosure of

which would constitute a clearly

unwarranted invasion of personal

privacy), as well as research information

(the premature disclosure of which

would be likely to frustrate significantly

implementation of proposed agency

action regarding such research projects).

As provided by the subsection 10(d) of

Pub. L. 92–463, as amended by Public

Law 94–409, closing portions of these

meetings is in accordance with 5 U.S.C.

552b(c)(6) and (9)(B).

Those who plan to attend the open

session should contact the Health

Services Research and Development

Assistant Director, Scientific Review

(124F), Health Services Research and

Development Service, Department of

Veterans Affairs, 1400 I Street, NW,

Suite 780, Washington, D.C., at least five

days before the meeting. For further

information, call (202) 408–3665.

Dated: November 1, 2000.

By Direction of the Acting Secretary

Marvin R. Eason,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00–28703 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320–01–M
#### WINN v. STATE.

No. 26305.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 11, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The offense is the' driving while intoxicated upon a public highway; the punishment, a fine of $100.

This record contains no statement of facts or bills of exception, without which nothing is presented for review.

The'judgment of the trial court is affirmed. ‘ ‘ \ ■ ■

Opinion' approved by the court
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28804]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Termination--The 
Connecticut Indemnity Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 6 to the Treasury Department Circ. 570; 
2000 Revision, published June 30, 2000, at 65 FR 40868.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Certificate 
of Authority issued by the Treasury to the above named Company, under 
the United States Code, Title 31, Sections 9304-9308, to qualify as an 
acceptable surety on Federal bonds is terminated effective today.
    The Company was last listed as an acceptable surety on Federal 
bonds at 65 FR 40877, June 30, 2000.
    With respect to any bonds currently in force with above listed 
Company, bond-approving officers should secure new bonds with 
acceptable sureties in those instances where a significant amount of 
liability remains outstanding. In addition, bonds that are continuous 
in nature should be replaced.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570/index.html. A hard copy may be purchased 
from the Government Printing Office (GPO), Subscription Service, 
Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-1800. When ordering the Circular 
from GPO, use the following stock number: 048-000-00536-5.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6A04, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: November 1, 2000.
Judith R. Tillman,
Assistant Commissioner, Financial Operations, Financial Management 
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-28804 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
#### Ex parte MONTGOMERY.

No. 24618.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 2, 1949.

Patrici J. Mendez, Austin, for appellant.-'

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Maudie Montgomery, styled relator, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus with' the Clerk of the 33rd Judicial District Court' of Burnet County in behalf of her husband, seeking to secure his release from the penitentiary on the asserted grounds that he is not guilty of the offense for which he was convicted and that he is now insane and' is in danger of serious injury as a convict in the state penitentiary.

The District Judge, acting under Article 119, C.C.P., Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., set the matter for hearing but limited his inquiry as to whether or not the convict’s sanity was inquired into at the time of the trial. Evidence was heard and the testimony produced at such hearing comes with the appeal to this Court. While the record does not state what order was made, it does appear that the court refused to-issue the writ. He then, in attempting to comply with Article 119, C.C.P., certified the matter to this Court for further proceedings. The district court had no author^ ity to so certify the matter, neither did relator have a right of appeal. See full discussion in Ex parte Montgomery, Tex.Cr.App., 223 S.W.2d 932.

The proceeding is not properly before this Court. It is accordingly dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
#### Ex parte COGDELL.

Mo. 25842.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 16, 1952.

Sam M. Russell, Stephenville, for appellant.

Sam Cleveland, Dist. Atty., Stephenville, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Relator was charged by indictment with the offense of murder of his wife, Thelma Cogdell, with malice aforethought by shooting her with a gun.

He sued out a writ of habeas corpus for the purpose of procuring an order from the court granting him bail pending the trial of his case. The district judge issued the writ of habeas corpus, the relator was produced before him and witnesses were introduced. Relator produced no testimony oth.er than the cross-examination of the state’s witnesses.

We have read 'appellant’s brief and the statement of facts in its entirety and are of the opinion that the trial court should be sustained in denying bail in this case. See Ex parte Cantu, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 281, 117 S.W.2d 1102; Ex parte Roberts, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 547, 209 S.W.2d 361; Ex parte Smithwick, Tex.Cr.App., 225 S.W.2d 187; Ex parte Meeks, Tex.Cr.App., 226 S.W.2d 437; and Ex parte Aeby, Tex.Civ.App., 228 S.W.2d 176.

While not commenting upon the testimony at this time, we think the judge was supported by the evidence. It was a matter within his discretion- and there being no indication of a defense or extenuating circumstances, we cannot say he abused that discretion. The judgment remanding relator to the custody of the sheriff without bail is affirmed. ' '
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

HENRY JOSEPH STEVENS, '

Fed. Reg. No. 60316-177, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

v. ' Civil Action No. 7:22-cv-00024-M-BP

'

VERNON TEXAS POLICE DEP’T, et al., '

'

Defendants. '

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the 

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26) is 

GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants for violating his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. '

1983 are DISMISSED with prejudice, and his tort claim brought under state law is DISMISSED 

without prejudice.

SO ORDERED this 24th day of February, 2023.

Case 7:22-cv-00024-M-BP Document 55 Filed 02/24/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 297
(a)  A review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 4, 2015 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as seller, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2015-A Owner Trust, as issuer, during the year ended December 31, 2017 has been made under my supervision.
 
 (b)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.
 
  
 /s/ Wei Shi
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                   OF RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF

                                PLANTRONICS, INC.

               Plantronics, Inc. (the "COMPANY"), a corporation organized and
existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware ("DGCL"),
certifies as follows:

               FIRST: At a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company,
resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, declaring said amendment to be
advisable, and directing that such amendment be considered at the next annual
meeting of the Company's stockholders. The resolution setting forth the proposed
amendment is as follows:

               NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That Article Four, Section 4.1,
Part 1, subsection (v) of the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation be
amended to read in its entirety as follows: "(v) 100,000,000 shares of
undesignated Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Common Stock")";

               SECOND: The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company (the
"ANNUAL MEETING") was called and held upon notice in accordance with Section 222
of the DGCL. At the Annual Meeting, the necessary number of shares as required
by statute were voted in favor of such amendment.

               THIRD: Said amendment has been duly adopted in accordance with
Section 242 of the DGCL.


               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to be signed by Kevin A. Goodwin, a duly authorized officer of the
Company, as of May 23, 2000.


                                  PLANTRONICS, INC.


                                  By:
                                            /s/ KEVIN A. GOODWIN
                                     ------------------------------------
                                      Kevin A. Goodwin
                                      Vice President--Legal, Senior General
                                      Counsel & Secretary

                                      II-8
P.1 

OAR Box 1796 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

47) VI-A-01 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 10/31/2008 4:20:37 PM Sheet 47 of 107 
P.2 

A-90-37 

VI-A-01 

This Document has been moved to IV-A-01 at the request of the Project 

Officer. This document was incorrectly categorized originally.
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of PowerComm Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31,
2015 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ David Kwasnik
                                 President, Director,
                                 Chief Executive Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: October 3, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 194 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 194

Expressing the sense of the Congress that any comprehensive health care 
    reform legislation that is enacted should require a Senator or 
    Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the 
   Congress to wait for a period equal to a national average waiting 
             period before receiving a health care service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 22, 1993

  Mr. Talent submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
  referred jointly to the Committees on Energy and Commerce and House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that any comprehensive health care 
    reform legislation that is enacted should require a Senator or 
    Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the 
   Congress to wait for a period equal to a national average waiting 
             period before receiving a health care service.

Whereas the President has made reform of the health care system in the United 
        States a priority for the Nation;
Whereas the President's health care reform proposal is intended to apply to the 
        receipt of health care services by every citizen of the United States;
Whereas Members of Congress will have a significant role in enacting health care 
        reform legislation; and
Whereas a citizen of the United States has a right to expect that the system 
        through which the citizen receives health care services will be at least 
        as effective and efficient as the health care system available to a 
        Member of Congress: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that any comprehensive health care 
reform legislation that is enacted should require--
            (1) a national board to calculate with respect to each 
        health care service the average period of time that an 
        individual in the United States who desires to receive the 
        service is required to wait before the service is available to 
        the individual; and
            (2) a Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resident 
        Commissioner to, the Congress to wait before receiving a health 
        care service for a period equal to the national average waiting 
        period for the service calculated under paragraph (1).

                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 30, 2020

a0923 

# Order

Clerk September 30, 2020

160415 & (57)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee/

Cross

- Appellant,

v SC: 160415

COA: 342001

Calhoun CC: 2017

- 001326

- FC

KYLAND ANDREW HUDSON,

Defendant

- Appellant/

Cross

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 29, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross

appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the

questions presented sh ould be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 6 to the Treasury Department Circ. 570; 2000 Revision, published June 30, 2000, at 65 FR 40868.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the Certificate of Authority issued by the Treasury to the above named Company, under the United States Code, Title 31, Sections 9304-9308, to qualify as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds is terminated effective today.

The Company was last listed as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds at 65 FR 40877, June 30, 2000.

With respect to any bonds currently in force with above listed Company, bond-approving officers should secure new bonds with acceptable sureties in those instances where a significant amount of liability remains outstanding. In addition, bonds that are continuous in nature should be replaced.

The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570/​index.html. A hard copy may be purchased from the Government Printing Office (GPO), Subscription Service, Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-1800. When ordering the Circular from GPO, use the following stock number: 048-000-00536-5.

Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6A04, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: November 1, 2000.

Judith R. Tillman,

Assistant Commissioner, Financial Operations, Financial Management Service.

[FR Doc. 00-28804  Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 23, 2016

No. 04-15-00783-CR

EX Parte Tamara Joy MCCRACKEN,

Appellant

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B14554

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The State’s Motion for Extension of Time to file the Brief is GRANTED. Time is 

extended to June 30, 2016.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of June, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 7 to the Treasury Department Circ. 570; 2000 Revision, published June 30, 2000, at 65 FR 40868.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the Certification of Authority issued by the Treasury to the above named Company, under the United States Code, Title 31, Sections 9304-9308, to qualify as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds is terminated effective today.

The Company was last listed as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds at 65 FR 40898, June 30, 2000.

With respect to any bonds currently in force with above listed Company, bond-approving officers should secure new bonds with acceptable sureties in those instances where a significant amount of liability remains outstanding. In addition, bonds that are continuous in nature should be replaced.

The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570/​index.html. A hard copy may be purchased from the Government Printing Office (GPO), Subscription Service, Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-1800. When ordering the Circular from GPO, use the following stock number: 048-000-00536-5.

Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6A04, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: November 1, 2000.

Judith R. Tillman,

Assistant Commissioner, Financial Operations, Financial Management Service.

[FR Doc. 00-28803  Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]

                BILLING CODE 4810-35-M                      ( print page 67476)