alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 170 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 170

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Directing the President pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers 
     Resolution to remove United States Armed Forces from Somalia.






103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 170

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES FROM SOMALIA.

    Pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 
1544(c)), the Congress hereby directs the President to remove United 
States Armed Forces from Somalia by March 31, 1994 (unless the 
President requests and the Congress authorizes a later date), except 
for a limited number of members of the Armed Forces sufficient only to 
protect United States diplomatic facilities and citizens, and 
noncombatant personnel to advise the United Nations commander in 
Somalia.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 9, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

MAC  R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045 |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill LynchTrust 2015-C22, Commercial Mortgage Pass- Through Certificates, Series 2015-C22

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of April 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), the undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2018 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

a)       A review of Wells Fargo’s activitiesduring the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has beenmade under such officer’s supervision; and

 

b)      To the best of such officer’s knowledge,based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period, exceptas noted in Schedule A.

 

 

February 12, 2019

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith 

Brian Smith 

Vice President

 

 

| © 2019 Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. All rights reserved. | (logo) Together we’ll go  far |
|----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|

 

 

Schedule A

 

 

**Material Instances of Non-Compliance**

 

List of Exemptions for Morgan StanleyBank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C22, Commercial Mortgage Pass- ThroughCertificates, Series 2015-C22.

 

On August 17, 2018, WellsFargo made a distribution (the “August Distribution”) to the holders of thecertificates of the Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust2015-C22, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C22. The August Distribution contained a payment error that resulted in theoverpayment to class H totaling approximately $428,000 and a correspondingunderpayment to class A-1 in the same amount.  The payment error resultedfrom an administrative error during the processing of a realized loss recovery.The impact of this error was limited to the August Distribution.

 

On September 14, 2018, theAugust Distribution was revised to correct the payment error, whereby fundsreceived from the overpaid class were distributed to the underpaid class. To prevent further similar payment errors, Wells Fargo has incorporatedadditional control procedures.
Case 3:22-cr-00143-M Document 29 Filed 01/12/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 52
Exhibit 12.2


                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Juan Ignacio Lopez Basavilbaso, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of TELEFONICA HOLDING
DE ARGENTINA S.A.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
     to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
     controls that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
     has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
     company's internal controls over financial reporting; and

     5. The company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
     design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which
     are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
     control over financial reporting.

     Date: July 14, 2005

                                        By: /s/ Juan Ignacio Lopez Basavilbaso
                                           -------------------------------------
                                        Name:   Juan Ignacio Lopez Basavilbaso
                                        Title:  Director
UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT F OR THE D ISTRIC T OFCO LU M BIA

____________________________________) NA DI R O M AR

AB DU LLA H BI N ) SA’ADOUN A LSA’ARY, ) a/k/a Ah m ed Om ar (ISN 30) ) ) P etitioner , ) ) v. ) Ci vilAc ti on N o. 09 -7 45 (R CL ) ) BARACK

OBAMA, e t al

. , )

) Re spo nde nt s. ) ____________________________________) OR DE R Upon consider ation of petitioner’ s Unopposed Motion [1354] to Ex tend FilingDea dline for Petitioner’s Tr aver se, it is hereby ORDERED that petitioner’s motion is gr anted. Petitioner shall have until April 15, 2010 to file his traver se. SO ORDERED.

Signed by Royce C. L amber

th, Chief J udg e, on January 7, 2010.
EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL


<PAGE>

                         Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
Leeds Federal Bankshares, Inc.

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statement  (No.
333-44899)  on Form S-8 of Leeds  Federal  Bankshares,  Inc. of our report dated
August 7, 1998,  relating to the consolidated  statements of financial condition
of Leeds Federal  Bankshares,  Inc. and subsidiary as of June 30, 1998 and 1997,
and the related  consolidated  statements of income,  stockholders'  equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period ended June 30, 1998,
which report  appears in the June 30, 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Leeds
Federal Bankshares, Inc.

/s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Baltimore, Maryland
September 25, 1998
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 176

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas many States have encouraged and facilitated the

creation of senior citizen legislative and advocacy bodies;

Whereas in creating such bodies these States have provided

many older Americans the opportunity to express concerns, promote appropriate interests, and advance the

common good by influencing legislation and actions of

State government; and

Whereas a National Silver Haired Congress, with representatives from each State, would provide a national forum for

a nonpartisan evaluation of grassroots solutions to concerns shared by an increasing number of older Americans: Now, therefore, be it
2

HCON 176 EH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress hereby recognizes and en3 courages the convening of an annual National Silver

4 Haired Congress in the City of Washington, District of

5 Columbia.

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
3

HCON 176 EH
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 176

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To recognize and encourage the convening of a

National Silver Haired Congress.
From: McCurdy, Dave [mailto:DMcCurdy@aga.org] 

Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 5:47 PM 

To: Secretary Moniz 

Cc: Knobloch, Kevin; Kenderdine, Melanie 

Subject: DOE Furnace Product Class 

Dear Secretary Moniz:

  

Thank you for the opportunity to brief your staff in recent weeks on an impact analysis of a national

condensing furnace standard, which was conducted jointly by the American Gas Association (AGA), the

American Public Gas Association (APGA), and the Gas Technology Institute (GTI).  Our analysis strongly

indicates significant adverse consequences are likely to accrue under a national condensing rule

standard, if the rule is not configured to minimize the likelihood of fuel switching from natural gas to

electrical space and water heating equipment.  

As we have expressed to your staff, we are deeply concerned that – if not appropriately structured – this

rule could prove to be the first energy efficiency standard issued in the history of the Department that

has the real‐world impact of increasing our nation’s overall energy consumption and carbon footprint.    

We look forward to working with you and your staff in developing a rule that assures real benefits to the

nation.   

  

Sincerely,

Dave

Dave McCurdy | President and Chief Executive Officer

American Gas Association

400 N. Capitol St., NW | Washington, DC | 20001

P: 202‐824‐7111 | F: 202‐824‐9111 | dmccurdy@aga.org

 

The American Gas Association represents more than 200 local energy companies committed to the safe delivery of

clean natural gas to over 68 million customers throughout the nation.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

SUSANNE BECKER, §

§

Plaintiff,

§

§

§

v. § 2:22-CV-00052-M-BR

CITY OF SCOTTSBLUFF POLICE 

DEPARTMENT,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is Plaintiff Susanne Becker’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint against

Defendant City of Scottsbluff Police Department (“Defendant”) (“Complaint”). (ECF 3). 

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action. The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, 

Conclusions, and a Recommendation regarding the Complaint. (ECF 4). No objections were filed. 

The District Court reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation for plain error. 

Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge, and Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF 3) is DISMISSED without 

prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 

SO ORDERED, this 30th day of August, 2022.

Case 2:22-cv-00052-M-BR Document 5 Filed 08/30/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 13
SEPTEMBER TERM, 1744.

#### Thomas Gough *against*Joseph Jenings.

IN this case the special bail surrendered the principal (in *Prince George’s*County) before one of the Justices of the Provincial Court, in discharge of himself as bail, and the principal was committed by the Justice to the custody of the sheriff of the County.

Upon motion of the special bail, and on filing in Court a certificate by the Justice of the surrender, the bail war discharged.

Lib. E. J. No. 7. fol. 70£<
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997, STATEMENT OF INCOME AND
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<PERIOD-TYPE>                         YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                45
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                         52,534
<ALLOWANCES>                          5,745
<INVENTORY>                           75,357
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      167,851
<PP&E>                                44,457
<DEPRECIATION>                        19,725
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        518,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 132,278
<BONDS>                               174,292
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           91,809
<COMMON>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                            69,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          518,060
<SALES>                               54,484
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      54,484
<CGS>                                 17,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         17,890
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      41,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      402
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    4,882
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (14,734)
<INCOME-TAX>                          (7,986)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (6,748)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          (6,748)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0


</TABLE>
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 22482.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 14, 1943.

Rehearing Denied May 5, 1943.

McIntosh & Duncan, of Gilmer, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of possessing whisky in a dry area for the purpose of sale, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $300, from which judgment he has appealed to this court.

 The record before us contains a number of bills of exception complaining of the action of the trial court in several respects, but the statement of facts is in question and answer form. This is contrary to the form prescribed by the statute. See Art. 760, C.C.P., Vernon’s Ann.Tex. C.C.P., Vol. 3; also Villalva v. State, 142 Tex.Cr.R. 120, 151 S.W.2d 222; Hunter v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 165 S.W.2d 998; Green v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 167 S.W.2d 532. Hence we cannot consider the statement of facts, in the absence of which we cannot properly appraise the bills of exception. Consequently there is nothing presented for review which requires discussion. Therefore the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

GRAVES, Judge.

In this cause the statement of facts is in the same condition as that in S. E. Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 170 S.W.2d 735, in which a motion for a rehearing by the appellant was this day overruled. For the reasons therein set forth, which apply with equal force to the present statement of facts, we cannot consider the same. There are no bills of exceptions that can be appraised without such statement.

The motion will therefore be overruled.
#### JOY v. NORTH TEXAS COMPRESS & WAREHOUSE CO.

No. 14232.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

May 2, 1941.

Rehearing Denied May 30, 1941.

*343J. W. Chancellor, of Bowie, for appellant.

J. C. Muse, Jr., of Dallas, for appellee.

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

Appellant brought suit against appellee, a corporation, alleging that the affairs of the corporation had been mismanaged by the majority stockholders; and that as a result the corporation was insolvent or in imminent danger of insolvency, and plaintiffs stock, of the par value of $12,000, had been rendered worthless. Plaintiff sought to recover his alleged damages from the corporation, and prayed for the appointment of a receiver to manage the affairs of the corporation. Defendant filed a pica in abatement, asserting: (1) That the persons intended to be charged with such mismanagement should have been joined as parties; (2) that the alleged cause of action for mismanagement would belong to the corporation itself, not to plaintiff, and that to be entitled to maintain such a suit on behalf of the corporation, plaintiff would have to allege and prove that the controlling officers had been requested, but had refused, to bring such a suit, that there were no regular officers to act, or that the officers were controlled by the persons whose acts were complained of and that it would be useless to demand that they bring such a suit; (3) that the appointment of a receiver could not be made the sole purpose of a suit, but could only be ancillary to a well-pleaded cause of action properly maintainable by the plaintiff.

The plea in abatement was sustained; and, plaintiff declining to amend, the suit was dismissed.

The action of the trial court was correct.' The principles of law presented by the plea in abatement are correct, and have been discussed so thoroughly and often by our courts that we do not consider it necessary to discuss them again. See Evans v. Brandon, 53 Tex. 56; Cates v. Sparkman, 73 Tex. 619, 11 S.W. 846, 15 Am.St.Rep. 806; New Birmingham Iron & Land Co. v. Blevins, 12 Tex.Civ.App. 410, 34 S.W. 828; People’s Inv. Co. v. Crawford, Tex.Civ.App., 45 *S.W. 738;*Prairie Lea Production Co. v. Tiller, Tex.Civ.App., 286 S.W. 638; Stinnett v. Paramount-Famous Lasky Corporation, Tex.Com.App., 37 S.W.2d 145; Rex Refining Co. v. Morris, Tex.Civ.App., 72 S.W.2d 687; Cullum v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation, Tex.Civ.App., 115 S.W.2d 1196; 10 Tex.Jur., pages 785 and 790.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### GILLIAM v. STATE.

No. 22358.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 13, 1943.

W. E. Martin, of Abilene, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

It is charged 'by complaint and information herein that appellant did allure, procure, invite and solicit a female to visit and be at a particular house, room or place in Abilene, Taylor County, Texas, for the purpose of meeting and having unlawful sexual intercourse with a male person, the punishment being a fine of $50 and a jail sentence of thirty days.

This complaint and information is in the same condition as that in Staggs v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 167 S.W.2d 527, this day decided, in that nowhere therein is set forth the name of the female thus alleged to have been allured, invited, solicited or procured to be at a place for the purpose of having sexual intercourse with a male person. It should be readily seen that possibly appellant, a taxicab driver, could have been engaged in the above denounced activities with other female persons than the one who testified in this cause, and it seems to .be axiomatic that in order that he might not again be placed in jeopardy for his activities with this State’s witness, Patsy Scoggins, the complaint and information should have set forth the offense in plain and intelligible words, — Art. 396, Sec. 7, C.C.P., — with the certainty that would enable the accused to plead the judgment that may be given upon it in bar of any prosecution for the same offense, — Art. 398, C.C.P., — and we think the pleader should have set forth therein the name of such female person thus alleged to have been procured, etc. This .the pleadings failed to do, and on account of such failure this judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 304 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.304
                                       Agreed to October 8, 1994        

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (S. 1312) to amend the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 in order to provide for the 
availability of remedies for certain former pension plan participants 
and beneficiaries, the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following 
corrections:
        (1) In section 1, strike ``1993'' and insert ``1994''.
        (2) In section 2(1), strike ``paragraph (5)'' and insert 
    ``paragraph (7)''.
        (3) In section 2(2), strike ``paragraph (6)'' and insert 
    ``paragraph (8)''.
        (4) In section 2(3), in the new paragraph (7) to be added 
    thereby, strike ``(7)'' and insert ``(9)''.
        (5) In section 3, strike ``subsection (a)(7)'' and insert 
    ``subsection (a)(9)''.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```