alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2889]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in open session at 
3 p.m. on Wednesday, February 9, 2000, to consider the following 
matters:

    Summary Agenda: No substantive discussion of the following items 
is anticipated. These matters will be resolved with a single vote 
unless a member of the Board of Directors requests that an item be 
moved to the discussion agenda.
    Disposition of minutes of previous Board of Directors' meetings.
    Summary reports, status reports, and reports of actions taken 
pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors.
    Memorandum and resolution re: Proposed amendment to Part 325--
Risk-Based Capital Treatment of Recourse and Direct Credit 
Substitutes.
    Discussion Agenda: Memorandum and resolution re: Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking--New Part 332--Privacy of Consumer Financial 
Information.
    The meeting will be held in the Board room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550--17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (e.g., sign 
language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees 
needing such assistance should call (202) 416-2449 (Voice); (202) 
416-2004 (TTY), to make necessary arrangements.
    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at (202) 898-6757.


    Dated: February 2, 2000.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-2889 Filed 2-3-00; 4:48 pm]
BILLING CODE 6214-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00039-Z-BR

§

ARCADIO GAMINO-GARCIA (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

ARCADIO GAMINO-GARCIA (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R.CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment.

After cautioning and examining ARCADIO GAMINO-GARCIA (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned 

in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense charged is supported by 

an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the plea 

of guilty be accepted, and that ARCADIO GAMINO-GARCIA (1) be adjudged guilty of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(1); 

and 6 U.S.C. §§ 202(3), 202(4), and 557 - ILLEGAL RE-ENTRY AFTER DEPORTATION and have sentence imposed 

accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: July 8, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00039-Z-BR Document 30 Filed 07/08/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 58
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-70-000]

Take notice that on October 31, 2000, Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC, (KMIGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1-A and Fourth Revised Volume 1-B, the tariff sheets listed on appendix A to the filing, to become effective December 1, 2000.

KMIGT states that the proposed changes update the KMIGT tariff and clarify certain tariff provisions with respect to KMIGT's tariff provisions governing negotiated rates, in accordance with current Commission policy and decisions concerning tariff filings made by other interstate pipelines with respect to negotiated rate authority.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-28758  Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
AIR RESOURCES BOARDVENTURA COUNTY APCD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 10 I. GENERAL INFORMATIONDistrict: Ventura County APCD Rule Nos.: 74.31 and23 Date Adopted: November 12, 2013Rule Titles: Metalworking Fluids and Direct Contact Lubricants (74.31), Exemptions from Permit (23)Date Submitted to ARB: December 12, 2013 If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended: Rule 23 on April 12,2011Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA asa SIP Revision? (X) Yes ( ) NoIf NO, do not complete remainder of form.District Contact: Stan Cowen Phone No.: 805/645-1408Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: (X) New Rule (X) Amended: New Rule 74.31 will regulate the ROC content ofmetalworking fluids and direct contact lubricants at metalworking operations. Amended Rule 23 will clarify the permit status of equipment/processes impacted by the ROC Content requirementsof Rule 74.31.Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Circle): ROG NOx SO2 PM10 COTACII. EFFECT ON EMISSIONSComplete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emission. Attach reference(s) for emission factor(s) and otherinformation. Attach calculation sheet showing howthe emissions information provided below was determined. See staff report Appendix A for emission calculations.Net Effect on Emissions: ( ) Increase (X) Decrease( ) N/A No impact on emissions. See attached staff report for emission reductioncalculations. The net effect of the three rules isto reduce ROC emissions by 41 tons per year.II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONSEmission Reduction Commitment in SIP (Control Measure ) for this source category: 2011 Triennial Assessment: New control measure andROC emission reductions estimated at 41 tons per year.Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: 2012 Area Affected: CountyFuture Year Control Profile Estimate:YearTons/yearReductions2012 BaselineTons/yearSubject to RuleControlLevelPercentControlControlLevelControl Factor2014 41/76=0.54 * 100 =54%1.00- 0.54=0.46AIR RESOURCES BOARDVENTURA COUNTY APCD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUSDistrict is: ( ) Attainment (X) Nonattainment () SplitApproximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule: 300Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %Number of Large (>100 TPY) Sources Controlled: None Percent in Nonattainment Area: Not ApplicableIV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGYDo the Rules Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes.V. OTHER REQUIREMENTSRULE 74.31 (Metalworking Fluids and Direct ContactLubricants) Requirements include:Emission Limits (ROC Content Limits: Section B.1Prohibition of Sale: Section B.3Recordkeeping: Section B.5Test Methods: Section DExemptions: Section CVI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN(X) No Impact ( ) Impacts RFP ( ) Impacts attainmentDiscussion: Amendments to Rule 74.31 will reduce ROC emissions for Ventura County’s efforts toward achieving attainment of theozone standard. Therefore, RFP will be furthered by amendments to both rules.
Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y   Document 168   Filed 11/28/23    Page 1 of 1   PageID 3444
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|East Coast (PADD 1) Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Pipeline (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|East Coast (PADD 1) Crude Oil Refinery Receipts by Pipeline (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        | 38,640 | 25,711 | 15,887 | 22,392 | 23,082 | 7,388  | 25,776 | 24,748 | 24,819
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 24,642 | 24,132 | 24,946 | 24,619 | 23,878 | NA     | 24,360 | NA     | 23,737 | 25,408
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 89,021 | 24,837 | 23,925 | 25,407 | 25,382 | 26,297 | 26,063 | 23,422 | 24,584 | 24,078
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 21,581 | 23,811 | 25,219 | 24,178 | 22,596 | 25,319 | 25,952 | 25,228 | 24,881 | 27,221
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 26,017 | 25,558 | 22,982 | 27,751 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
MEMORANDUM

TO: Docket for Reconsideration of 2008 Ozone NAAQS (Docket ID No. EPA-HQOAR-2005-0172)

RE: Meetings with OMB on draft Ozone Reconsideration Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking

On December 10, 2009 EPA and OMB discussed OMB’s comments on the draft 

Ozone Reconsideration Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) sent to OMB on October 

20, 2009. In response to requests from OMB, EPA made the following changes to the 

notice: deletion of text that included details of the history of the exchange between OMB

and EPA just prior to issuance of the final 2008 Ozone NAAQS rule, and clarification of 

the nature of the Administrator’s discretion in selecting a primary standard that is 

requisite to protect public health with an adequate margin of safety. These changes were 

included in a version of the draft Ozone NPR sent to OMB on December 16, 2009.

On December 29, 2009 EPA and OMB met to discuss OMB’s comments on the 

December 16 version of the draft Ozone NPR. A representative from CEA also 

participated in the discussion. OMB raised several points on which they requested the 

following changes to the notice: additional discussion of the benefits associated with the 

proposed secondary standard; solicitation of comment on the incremental benefits of the 

proposed secondary standard relative to the benefits of the secondary standard set in 

2008; deletion of remaining text that included details of the history of the exchange 

between OMB and EPA just prior to issuance of the final 2008 Ozone NAAQS rule; 

acknowledgement that there were differing views on the interpretation of the Adams 

studies and EPA’s reanalysis of data from the Adams (2006) study; further clarification 

of the nature of the Administrator’s discretion in selecting a primary standard that is 

requisite to protect public health with an adequate margin of safety; and solicitation of 

comment on the incremental benefits of a primary standard set within the proposed range 

of levels relative to the benefits associated with the primary standard set in 2008. These

changes were included in a version of the draft Ozone NPR sent to OMB on December 

30, 2009.

On January 5, 2009 EPA and OMB met to discuss OMB’s comments on the 

December 30 version of the draft Ozone NPR. OMB requested two changes. The first 

concerned the description of EPA’s use of the Adams studies in its rationale for the 

March 2008 decision. The second addressed the characterization of the Administrator’s 

decision in concluding that important and significant risks to public health are likely to 

occur at the level of the 2008 primary standard and the description of the evidence 

considered by the Administrator in reaching this conclusion. EPA made changes to 

address these comments and sent the revisions to OMB in an e-mail on January 5, 2010. 

These changes were also included in the final version of the draft Ozone NPR sent to 

OMB later that day.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Secured Digital  Applications,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ending March 31, 2007 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Voon Fui Yong,  Chief  Accounting  Officer  (principal  financial
officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ Voon Fui Yong
-----------------
Voon Fui Yong
Chief Accounting Officer
May 14, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 236 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

<DOC>

        H.Con.Res.236
                                          Agreed to May 19, 1994        

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL OLYMPICS TORCH RELAY 
THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.
    On May 20, 1994, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may 
jointly designate, the 1994 Special Olympics Torch Relay may be run 
through the Capitol Grounds, as part of the journey of the Special 
Olympics torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics summer 
games at Gallaudet University in the District of Columbia.
SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.
    The Capitol Police Board shall take such action as may be necessary 
to carry out section 1.
SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.
    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event authorized by section 1.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned, Gilles Delfassy, Chairman of the Board and Interim President and
Chief Executive Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies
that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 27, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
November 3, 2008


By:
            /s/
      Gilles DelfassyGilles
      DelfassyChairman
      of the Board and Interim
      President and Chief Executive
Officer





This
certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by
reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
by reference.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained by
ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.