alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1842

GREGORY G. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-433-3-MU) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 21, 1999Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory G. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Stacy Kaplan Weinberg, John Barnwell Anderson, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on May 18, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on May 25, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM:Gregory G. Williams appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Federal Express Corporation , No. CA-97-433-3-MU (W.D.N.C. May 25, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.3
 
                       EAGLE FAMILY FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.
 
                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 
                       (THOUSANDS EXCEPT RATIO AMOUNTS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  ONE HUNDRED
                                                                    FIFTY-
                                                                   FIVE DAY
                                                                 PERIOD ENDED
                                                                 JUNE 27, 1998
                                                                 -------------
<S>                                                              <C>
ADJUSTED EARNINGS
Income (loss) before income taxes...............................   $(40,702)(b)
Portion of rent ($180) representative of interest...............         60
Interest on indebtedness........................................     11,571
                                                                   --------
    Total earnings (loss) as adjusted...........................   $(29,071)
                                                                   ========
FIXED CHARGES
Portion of rent representative of interest......................         60
Interest on indebtedness........................................     11,571
                                                                   --------
  Total fixed charges...........................................   $ 11,631
                                                                   ========
Deficiency of earnings..........................................   $(40,702)
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges..............................        -- (a)
                                                                   ========
</TABLE>
--------
(a) As earnings for the one hundred fifty-five day period ended June 27, 1998
    were inadequate to cover fixed charges, a ratio of earnings to fixed
    charges for the period has not been presented. The deficiency of earnings
    to fixed charges was approximately $41.0 million.
(b) Reflects the nonrecurring in-process research and development write-off of
    $23.9 million.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Bradley Leroy Thompson, Appellant

No. 06-15-00002-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 115th District Court of 

Upshur County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 16,737). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Bradley Leroy Thompson, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 19, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

ROBERT (BOB) VARGAS §

§

VS. § CIVIL NO. 4:22-CV-343-Y

§ (Consolidated w/4:22-CV-430-Y)

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL §

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, ET AL. §

§

AND §

§

EUGENIO VARGAS §

§

VS. §

§

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL §

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, ET AL. §

ORDER REFERRING MOTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Rules 30(d)

and 37(b) Sanctions (doc. 205). After review of this motion and the

record in this case, the Court concludes that the motion should be

and is hereby REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L.

Cureton for determination. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A).

All papers filed hereafter regarding this motion shall include

the following notation under the case-number: “(Relates to Motion

Referred to Magistrate Judge Cureton).”1 

SIGNED February 20, 2024.

____________________________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1The judge’s copy of all documents related to this motion should be mailed to the

Honorable Jeffrey L. Cureton, Eldon B. Mahon United States Courthouse, 501 West

10th Street, Room 520, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 208 Filed 02/20/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 4873
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Digital Applications, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Patrick Soon-Hock Lim, Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                          /s/ Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
                                              ---------------------
                                              Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
                                              Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
                                              November 16, 2004
Case 3:22-cv-00594-E-BT Document 82 Filed 07/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 366
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

STATE OF TEXAS et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JOSEPH R BIDEN, JR, et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-00780-M

ORDER

Before the Court is the Motion for a Proposed Schedule for Further Proceedings. ECF 

No. 105. The Court GRANTS the Motion. The following deadlines must be observed.

Event Deadline

Plaintiffs to file any amended or supplemental

complaint

August 24, 2023

Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants to serve any

responses and objections to existing discovery

requests

September 15, 2023 

Federal Defendants and DefendantIntervenors to file any motion to dismissOctober 16, 2023 

Plaintiffs to file any response to any motion to

dismiss

November 6, 2023 

Federal Defendants and DefendantIntervenors to file any reply in support of any

motion to dismiss

November 20, 2023 

Parties to meet and confer and to file a joint

status report proposing a schedule for the

remainder of the case

30 days after any order on any motions to 

dismiss

SO ORDERED.

August 21, 2023.

Case 3:22-cv-00780-M Document 107 Filed 08/21/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1106
BARBARA M. G. LYNN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00780-M Document 107 Filed 08/21/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1107
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 176 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 176

 To recognize and encourage the convening of a National Silver Haired 
                               Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 1993

 Mr. Gephardt submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 To recognize and encourage the convening of a National Silver Haired 
                               Congress.

Whereas many States have encouraged and facilitated the creation of senior 
        citizen legislative and advocacy bodies;
Whereas in creating such bodies these States have provided many older Americans 
        the opportunity to express concerns, promote appropriate interests, and 
        advance the common good by influencing legislation and actions of State 
        government; and
Whereas a National Silver Haired Congress, with representatives from each State, 
        would provide a national forum for a nonpartisan evaluation of 
        grassroots solutions to concerns shared by an increasing number of older 
        Americans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress hereby recognizes and encourages the convening of an 
annual National Silver Haired Congress in the City of Washington, 
District of Columbia.

                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-20147

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ISRAEL ADAME,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-95-CR-314-4

--------------------

September 22, 1999

Before JOLLY, JONES and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Israel Adame appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin and

methamphetamine and distribution of heroin. Adame argues that

the district court erred in failing to find that he was a minor

participant entitled to a downward adjustment of his offense

level under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(c). The Government contends that

Adame is not entitled to a role reduction because he was

sentenced on the basis of only the two drug transactions in which

he actually participated, rather than all the transactions 
No. 99-20147

-2-

conducted during the course of the conspiracy. 

After reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we

find no error in not treating Adame as a minor participant, as he

supplied the heroin for the two drug transactions on which his

sentence was based. The fact that he may have been a minor

player in the larger overall conspiracy does not entitle him to a

mitigating role adjustment. See United States v. Atanda, 60 F.3d

196, 199 (5th Cir. 1995) (holding that "when a sentence is based

on activity in which a defendant was actually involved, § 3B1.2

does not require a reduction in the base offense level even

though the defendant's activity in a larger conspiracy may have

been minor or minimal") (citations omitted). 

Therefore, the district court did not err, clearly or

otherwise, in denying Adame’s request for a mitigating role

adjustment. See United States v. Flucas, 99 F.3d 177, 180-81

(5th Cir. 1996). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
(logo) GREYSTONE

 

C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLCd/b/a

GREYSTONE SPECIAL SERVICING

5221 N. O’Connor Blvd., Suite800

Irving, Texas 75039

Phone: 972-868-5300

Fax: 972-868-5303

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

** **

The undersigned, Barry Davis,Vice President of C-III Asset Management LLC, the current Special Servicerunder that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2015,relating to the **CSAIL 2015-C1 Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C1** (the “Pooling and ServicingAgreement”), hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.  a review of theactivities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement during the calendar year 2019 (the “Reporting Period”) hasbeen made under the undersigned’s supervision;

 

2.  to the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer maintainedan effective internal control system relating to its servicing of the MortgageLoans serviced by it and has fulfilled in all material respects its obligationsunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2020, I havehereuntosigned my name.

 

/s/ Barry Davis

**Barry Davis**, Vice President
**Exhibit10.2**

 

 

**Summaryof Director Compensation Arrangements**

 

We currently pay eachdirector who is not employed by us or any of our affiliates (i.e., all of ourdirectors except for our Chairman, Frank F. Khulusi) a quarterly retainer of$7,000, plus $2,500 for each regular board meeting attended in person ortelephonically, $1,000 for each special board meeting attended in person ortelephonically and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended in person ortelephonically. We also pay the chairperson of the Audit Committee of our Boardof Directors an additional quarterly retainer of $3,125 and the chairperson ofthe Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors an additional quarterlyretainer of $1,250 for serving in such capacities. Directors who are employedby us or any of our affiliates are not paid any additional compensation fortheir service on our Board of Directors. We reimburse each of our directors forreasonable out-of-pocket expenses that they incur in connection with attendingboard or committee meetings. We have entered into indemnification agreements, aform of which is attached as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2006, with each of our directors.

 

Our directors are alsoeligible to participate in our 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, which isadministered by our Compensation Committee under authority delegated by ourBoard of Directors. The terms and conditions of option and stock bonus grantsto our non-employee directors under our 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended,are determined in the discretion of our Compensation Committee, and must beconsistent with the terms of the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, whichis filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2006.

 

The compensationarrangements we have with our directors are reviewed and may be modified fromtime to time by our Board of Directors.

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JOHN DOE,

Plaintiff, 

v.

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY and 

VICTOR J. BOSCHINI, JR., in his official 

capacity,

Defendants. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-CV-00297-O 

AGREED DISMISSAL ORDER WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), the Court DISMISSES all causes of 

action with prejudice to re-filing of the same that Plaintiff John Doe brought against Defendant 

Texas Christian University in the above captioned case. Further, the Court EXPRESSLY 

RETAINS continuing jurisdiction over the parties’ Confidential Settlement and Release 

Agreement solely to enforce the terms of the Agreement, if necessary.

SO ORDERED on this 9th day of January, 2023. 

Case 4:22-cv-00297-O Document 192 Filed 01/09/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 10520
Case 3:22-cv-00986-S-BH Document 114 Filed 01/24/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1607
Case 3:22-cv-00986-S-BH Document 114 Filed 01/24/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1608
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,840,609
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,228,857
<PP&E>                                       2,969,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                 160,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,278,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          823,658
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        80,465
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,157,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,278,330
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,957,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (48,351)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,909,416)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,909,416)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,909,416)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        


</TABLE>
Order - Solo Page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, §

§

 Plaintiff, §

§

v. §

§

§

 Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-769-L

JOHN DOE, §

§

 Defendant. §

ORDER

Because of common questions of fact and law, and in the interest of judicial economy, this 

case is hereby transferred to the docket of the Honorable United States District Judge Ed 

Kinkeade. This action shall henceforth carry the suffix letter “K.” All future pleadings and other 

papers shall henceforth be filed under Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-769-K.

It is so ordered this 6th day of April, 2022.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge

Case 3:22-cv-00769-K Document 6 Filed 04/06/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 25
#### Lester POSEY, appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, appellee.

No. 24123.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 3, 1948.

No appearance for appellant. .

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER,' Judge.

The offense is murder. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of 50 years.

Appellant has filed a motion duly verified by him in which he requests this court to dismiss his appeal.

The motion is granted and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT 32

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Daniel C. Wright,  the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
GolfGear International,  Inc. (the "Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, that to the best of
my knowledge:

(1)   the  Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB  of the  Company  for the year  ended
      December 31, 2004 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.

Dated:  September 16, 2005                         /s/ Daniel C. Wright
                                                   Daniel C. Wright
                                                   Chief Executive Officer and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

BENJAMIN DAVIS, #1734875 §

§

Petitioner, §

§

V. § No. 3:22-CV-569-X-BK

§ USCA NO. 22-10639

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a 

recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The court reviewed the 

proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, 

the court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge and FINDS that Petitioner has failed to meet his burden of 

showing that he delivered his notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing on or 

before June 9, 2022, the last day for filing a timely notice of appeal.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Change Venue, Motion to Discover Extradition, and 

Motion Sworn Mandamus Declaration & Transient Enroute Change of Venue are 

DENIED. Docs. 18-20. 

SO ORDERED this 2nd day November, 2022.

____________________________________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00569-X-BK Document 22 Filed 11/02/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 60