alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DOLLINGER v. STATE.

No. 25404.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 24, 1951.

Kenneth Bing, Velasco, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50.

Bill of Exception No. 1 complains that the State was permitted to cross-examine appellant’s wife as to whether she had been charged with a felony. It is appellant’s contention that such question was improper because it was beyond the scope of her direct examination. With this contention we cannot agree.

“From the statute and the decisions of this court and the Supreme Court, there can be no question but that the rule is that when the husband who is on trial introduces his wife to testify in his behalf, and she does so, that she is subject to cross-examination and impeachment just like any other witness, save and except that new incriminating evidence cannot be brought out from her *against the accused,*nor can wholly immaterial matter be brought out for impeachment of her any more than it can be from any other witness.” Roberts v. State, 74 Tex.Cr.R. 150, 168 S.W. 100, 113.

It will be noted that the question concerning a former felony charge against the witness touched her credibility and was not “evidence against the accused.”

*892Bill of Exception No. 2 complains of the overruling of appellant’s motion for new trial based upon newly discovered evidence. The sworn statement mentioned in the bill relates to a matter entirely foreign to the only issue before the court, i. e., the state of intoxication of the defendant, he ¡having admitted that he was driving. Therefore, the trial court acted properly in overruling the motion.

Finding no error, the judgment of the trial court is 'affirmed.
#### LEVISLES CARPENTER *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

*Todd A. Edgington,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Decided July 8, 1998

The petitioner Levisles Carpenter’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 920 (AC 17043), is denied.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-LC20 (the"Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesrequired to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 ofRegulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Anymaterial instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, WilmingtonTrust, National Association, as Trustee,Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC (f/k/a Trimont Real EstateAdvisors, Inc.), as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC., as ServicingFunction Participant, Computershare Trust Company, National Association, asServicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator on and afterNovember 1, 2021, and Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and afterNovember 1, 2021.

 

 

 

Dated: March 11, 2022 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

Anthony Sfarra

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

ROBERT “BOB” ROSS AND 

EUGENIO VARGAS

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants,

v.

ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL

FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, et al.,

Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Action No. 4:22-CV-343-Y

Consolidated with 

Action No. 4:22-CV-430-Y

 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL 

AND MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED RESPONSE

Pending before the Court is the Motion for Mandatory Withdrawal of Counsel and Motion

to Extend Plaintiffs’ Deadline to File Amended Response (doc. 253). After review of the motion

and the record in this case, the Court concludes that good cause exists for the withdrawal

and extension, and the motion is therefore GRANTED. 

Accordingly, Kerri Phillips is hereby WITHDRAWN as attorney of record for Eugenio

Vargas and Robert “Bob” Ross. Vargas and Ross shall have until October 21, 2024, to either:

(1) obtain new counsel, who shall file a notice of appearance with the Court by that date, or

(2) to notify the Court, in writing, of their intention to proceed further in this matter pro se. 

Additionally, Plaintiffs’ deadline to file an Amended Response to Defendants’ Motion for

Summary Judgment (doc. 234) is extended to November 12, 2024. 

SIGNED September 19, 2024.

____________________________________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00343-Y Document 255 Filed 09/19/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 8593
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

 

I, Cory J. Reed, certify that:

 

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2015 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association (as indenture trustee).

 

 

 

 

 
|   | Date: January 26, 2018 | By:    | */s/   Cory J. Reed*                        |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                        |   | Cory J. Reed                                |
|   |                        |   | President of John Deere Capital Corporation |
|   |                        |   | (as Servicer)                               |

 

----
CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


 Exhibit 10(i)

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 








          We hereby consent to the use in this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement of Massachusetts
Mutual Variable Annuity Separate Account 4 Individual Certificates issued under a Deferred Group Variable Annuity on Form N-4 (File No. 333-95851) of our report, which includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the use of statutory accounting practices,
which practices differ from generally accepted accounting principles, dated February 25, 1999 relating to the statutory financial statements of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, which appear in such Registration Statement. We also consent to
the references to us under the caption “Experts” in the Statement of Additional Information in such Registration Statement.


 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 



Hartford, Connecticut




August 1, 2000
OFFICEOFTHEATTORNEY **GENERALOF** AUSTIN

HonorableWalker Carson county Attorney Hudspeth County Sierra Elanca,Tsar Dear Sir: Opinion Wo. C-3040 Ra: ~~~~~y.,Sunsyors - qualiflos-

- license not required.

"Can CoB4slrlonere' court legaUy.appoint to the oftice of Cougtp;$urveyor a person who Is not llosnsad surveyor but has had twenty years experlenaeand holds asaoalate oon&ructlon engineerrating with civil servlesArtfole

. 5299 Revised Civil .?ta%utes?" has bean recefvedand oarefully oonslderedby this depament. provides: Section 44, OS Artiola 13 of our State Constitution

"See. 44. The Legislature shall prescribe the duties **and** povide for the eleation by the quallSiod

voters of eaoh oouhtp in this State, of a oounty treasurerand a county surveyor, who shall have an offlcs at the county seat, and bold their oSfice for two yeare, a& until their successors

are yaallfied;and shall have such cm:gmsation a8 may be provided by law.- It till be aoted that, the above quoted section OS the Constitution

does not require a lioense or any other **par** ticular qualifications for a,County Surveyor. Secate sill 351 OS the 47th Legislatureof Texas is a conprehensive menduent to Articles 5238 - 3232, inolu-HonorableWalker Carson, Page 2

sive, behlingwith *Lieenee~Land Surveyors". We quote from opinionNo. O-3719 of this deptkrtaent which construessaid senate, hill, ea ~0110w.9: "SenateMl1 351 doee not operate to nuke urdawf’ul the paatioe OS jurveying by LLosewho have not obtained a license. It, and the ihatute it anends, si?tply deny to tboee not having a license the gartlcular Trivileges

grmted by the eat to lioensed land surveyore." Xe encloseherewitha copy of said opinionfor your inforxatlon.

Artioles 5288 - 5298, inoluaive,Section 2 oi Chapter 2, Title 86, Vernon'8 iugoteted **Texas Civil**  **Stetutee,** deal with bounty 2urveyorm. These atatutesprovUs for the sleotion, duties,eta. OS the County Surveyor but do not presarlbe any pextloularqualiSiaations for County **Surveyors.** Nor 60 the etetuteoprescribethat the Colinty Durveyolsmuat

be lltensed or nust be Uceneed land surveyors.

Article 5299, Vernon.6 AnnotatedTexus Civil Statutes, grovidee:

*All surveys oS public land shall be sade by authorityof law and by a surveyor duly appointed,cleated or liaenseff, en8 qualified." :%I eeeume Sron your lettar that there 1s a vaaenQg in the o:Slceof County Surveyor and the CorUnisaionera~ Court desiresto Sill that vaoanoy by appointment.

It is our opinion that-e County Surveyor 18 not req?iired

to be lioensednor is he required to be a licensed lend surveyor. Very truly youra ATTORNEY GZXRIIL OF TEXAS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JOHN DOE,

Plaintiff,

v.

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY and 

VICTOR J. BOSCHINI, JR., in his official 

capacity,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:22-CV-00297-O

AGREED DISMISSAL ORDER WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), the Court DISMISSES all causes of 

action with prejudice to re-filing of the same that Plaintiff John Doe brought against Defendant 

Texas Christian University in the above captioned case. Further, the Court EXPRESSLY 

RETAINS continuing jurisdiction over the parties’ Confidential Settlement and Release 

Agreement solely to enforce the terms of the Agreement, if necessary.

SO ORDERED on this ____ day of January, 2023.

_______________________________

THE HON. REED O’CONNOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00297-O Document 191 Filed 01/03/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 10519
### ~AMPAC**TM** 

# 0 HALOTRON

_________________ _

Rebecca von dem Hagen Stratospheric Protection Division March 21, 2014

US Environmental Protection Agency MC 6205J 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW. Washington, D.C. 20460 RE: Additional Document for TS-2BTP13 SNAP Application Dear Rebecca: We are providing additional documents to be added to our historical 1992 SNAP filing for HCFC Blend B. As discussed in the original submittal , a second reproductive and developmental toxicity screening study was being completed. One intent of this study was to dete1mine a NOAEL, which was not determined from the first study, and this was met. The test substance is intended for use as a fire extinguishing agent and a second intent was to evaluate a special acute exposure group to mimic the maximum exposure to the test substance as discharged from a fire extinguisher in all known environments where clean agents are used, including aviation. While it was desired to assess a single maximum exposure in humans , the study included daily exposures at the cardiotox LOAEL for 5 minutes , which is the maximum allowable exposure under industry standards. The final report for this study has been issued and CBI and non-CBI versions are attached.

Bradford Colton Cc: Jeff Gibson Enclosures: WIL Research 2014, An Inhalation Reproduction /

Developm ental Toxicity Screening Study of2-Bromo-3, 3, 3-Trifluoropropene in Rats, March 21, 2014. (CBI and Redacted versions attached) Ha lotron Divis ion 3883 How a rd Hugh es Parl<way, Suit e 700 • Las Vegas , N evada 89 169 T

e l : +1 (702) 735 -2200 • F ax: +1 (702) 735-4876 www.halotron.com
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

TARA FARRELL, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NEW MILLENNIUM CONCEPTS, LTD., 

Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

C.A. No. 3:22-cv-00728-M 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFFS’ CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Class Action 

Complaint (the “Motion”). Having considered the Motion and the response and reply thereto, 

the Court GRANTS the Motion in its entirety. 

All claims asserted in Plaintiffs’ Class Action Complaint against Defendant New 

Millennium Concepts, Ltd. are DISMISSED in their entirety with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED. 

_____________, 2022. 

 

BARBARA M. G. LYNN 

CHIEF JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cv-00728-M Document 50-1 Filed 04/21/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 765
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,266,922
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,389,186
<ALLOWANCES>                                   643,000
<INVENTORY>                                 13,525,627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,628,001
<PP&E>                                      18,901,673
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,838,088
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,048,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,395,673
<BONDS>                                     19,134,260
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,074
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,200,619
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,048,874
<SALES>                                     25,410,114
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,410,114
<CGS>                                       19,964,345
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,035,293
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (54,854)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             916,746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                512,924
<INCOME-TAX>                                   210,389
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            302,535
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   302,535
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# AGENCY:

 Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of Cancellation of Advisory Committee Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Defense Science Board was scheduled to meet in closed session at the Pentagon, Arlington, VA, on January 26-27, 2000. However, due to severe weather conditions, the meeting was cancelled and has not been rescheduled. Notice of this meeting was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on November 24, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 226, Page 66173).                    

Dated: February 2, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-2816 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3498 

To allow individuals to choose to opt out of the Medicare part A benefit 

and to allow individuals opting out of such benefit to be eligible for 

health savings accounts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2013 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself and Mr. PERRY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To allow individuals to choose to opt out of the Medicare 

part A benefit and to allow individuals opting out of 

such benefit to be eligible for health savings accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ALLOWING INDIVIDUALS TO CHOOSE TO OPT 

4 OUT OF THE MEDICARE PART A BENEFIT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any individual who is otherwise 

6 entitled to benefits under part A of title XVIII of the So7 cial Security Act may elect (in such form and manner as 

8 may be specified by the Secretary of Health and Human 

9 Services) to opt out of such entitlement. Notwithstanding 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3498 IH

1 any other provision of law, in the case of an individual 

2 who makes such an election, such individual— 

3 (1) may (in such form and manner as may be 

4 specified by the Secretary) subsequently choose to 

5 end such election and opt back into such entitlement 

6 (in accordance with a process determined by the 

7 Secretary) without being subject to any penalty; 

8 (2) shall not be required to opt out of benefits 

9 under title II of such Act as a condition for making 

10 such election; and 

11 (3) shall not be required to repay any amount 

12 paid under such part A for items and services fur13 nished prior to making such election. 

14 (b) INDIVIDUALS OPTING OUT OF MEDICARE PART

15 A ELIGIBLE FOR HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS.—Section 

16 223 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

17 (1) in subsection (b), by striking paragraph (7), 

18 and 

19 (2) in subsection (d)(2)(C)(iv), by inserting 

20 ‘‘and who has not elected to opt out of the rights to 

21 benefits under part A of title XVIII of such Act’’ 

22 after ‘‘section 1811 of the Social Security Act’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 4.9

Wachovia Bank, N.A.
Business Banking
NJ1927
95 Route 17 South
2nd Floor
Paramus, NJ 07652

Fax 201 226-2999

     January 25, 2006

[WACHOVIA LOGO OMITTED]                                  [WACHOVIA LOGO OMITTED]

     Mr. Ned Mavrommatis, CFO
     I D Systems Inc
     One University Plaza
     Hackensack, New Jersey 07601

             Re: Loan Agreement dated January 2, 2003

     Dear Mr. Mavrommatis:

          Reference is made to that certain LOAN AGREEMENT dated as of January
     2, 2003 (the "Agreement") between I D Systems Inc (the "Borrower") and
     Wachovia Bank, National Association (the "Bank"). The Agreement and all
     other documents executed and delivered in connection therewith are
     collectively referred to herein as the "Loan Documents". All capitalized
     terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned in the
     Loan Documents.

          The Agreement provides for:

          Financial Covenant: Borrower shall, at all times, maintain Liquid
     Assets of not less than $3,000,000.00.

          The Borrower has requested the Bank's waiver, and the Bank does hereby
     permanently waive this provision, subject to Borrower's execution of and
     return of this letter. This waiver is limited to the covenant recited above
     and shall not be construed to be a waiver of any subsequent covenants, or
     of any existing or future covenants under any other provision of any Loan
     Document.

          The Borrower, by signature below, represents and warrants that there
     exist no defaults or event of default under the Loan Documents, that the
     Loan Documents are in full force and effect, and that Borrower does not
     have any defenses to its obligations under the Loan Documents nor any
     claims against Bank.

          Please evidence your acceptance of the terms of this waiver by signing
     and returning to the Bank a copy of this letter bearing original authorized
     signature of each of the parties indicated.

                                            Very Truly Yours,

                                            Wachovia Bank, National Association


                                            BY: /s/ Marguerette Atkinson-Vicks
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Name: Marguerette Atkinson-Vicks
                                                Title: Vice President



     ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

     I.D. Systems, Inc.

     By: /s/ Ned Mavrommatis
         ------------------------------
         Name:  Ned Mavrommatis
         Title: Chief Financial Officer


     Date:   1/26/06
           -----------

     544377