alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3339 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3339

To prohibit the use of funds by the Department of Education relating to 
                 multistate academic content standards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 24, 2013

 Mr. Kingston introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of funds by the Department of Education relating to 
                 multistate academic content standards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``One Size Does Not Fit All in 
Education Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES.

    (a) In General.--No funds appropriated or otherwise available to 
the Department of Education may be used to--
            (1) develop, implement, or evaluate any set of multistate 
        academic content standards or any assessments aligned with such 
        standards; or
            (2) award any grant, contract, or cooperative agreement 
        that requires or authorizes the development, implementation, or 
        evaluation of multistate academic content standards or 
        assessments aligned with such standards.
    (b) Applications.--The Secretary of Education may not require a 
State to adopt multistate academic content standards or assessments 
aligned with such standards as an eligibility requirement in an 
application for Federal funds.
    (c) Waiver.--Section 9401 of the Elementary and Secondary Education 
Act (20 U.S.C. 7861) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(h) Multistate Standards.--The Secretary may not require a State 
to adopt multistate academic content standards or assessments aligned 
with such standards as a condition for receiving a waiver under this 
section.''.
    (d) Multistate Academic Content Standard Defined.--In this Act, the 
term ``multistate academic content standard''--
            (1) means an academic content standard adopted by more than 
        one State; and
            (2) includes the Common Core State Standards developed by 
        the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices 
        and the Council of Chief State School Officers.
                                 <all>
```
#### PUCKETT v. PUCKETT.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 22, 1953.

*520Ephraim K. Lawrence, Jr., Louisville, for appellant.

Walter Patrick, Lawrenceburg, for ap-pellee.

MILLIKEN, Justice.

This is an appeal involving a judgment granting the husband a divorce, the custody of two small daughters, and refusing alimony to the wife.

 The parties were married on May 31, 1947, when she was fifteen years of age and he twenty-one. They separated on December 29, 1951, and he filed his action for divorce on January 2, 1952, on the ground of cruelty, and his wife promptly filed an answer denying the charges and counterclaiming for divorce. As is usual in contested divorce cases, the reputation of each party was smeared by the other. No good purpose would be served either to the litigants or to the bar for us to recount the testimony here. Suffice it to say, there was sufficient evidence to justify granting a divorce to the husband and refusing to grant alimony to the wife. The proof was taken by deposition and not in open court. The testimony discloses that the mother of the appellee and his childless, married sister are both willing and able to care for the two small children. While we ordinarily do not approve a separation of such young children from their mother, we believe the chancellor was justified in the present case in awarding their custody to the father. It was for the best interest of the children.

The chancellor is directed to assess a reasonable fee for the wife’s attorney as part of the costs against the husband, KRS 453.120, since it appears that the wife has no estate of her own.

Judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part.
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________ NO. 09
- 12
- 00 342
- CV



### _________________
IN RE COMMITMENT OF LARRY DALE LANZONE

________________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 11
- 12
- 12933
- CV

________________________________________________________________________ ORDER To: Heather Deiss, 16602 Eastchase, Montgomery, Texas 77316 You are hereby ORDERED to appear in person in the courtroom of the Ninth Court of Appeals for the State of Texas in the Montgomery County Administration Building, 301 North Thompson, 2nd floor, Conroe, Texas, on January 10, 2013, at 3:00
p.m. Heather Deiss is responsible for preparing, certifying, and timely filing the reporter’s record for Larry Dale Lanzone ’s appeal. On July 24 , 2012, the appellant transmitted to Deiss a request that a reporter’s record of all trial and pretrial proceedings be prepared

. The reporter’s record for this appeal was originally due on August 29 , 2012.2 On October 25, 2012, the Court abated the appeal and remanded the case to the trial court to determine why Deiss failed to file the record. The trial court ordered Deiss to file the reporter’s record by Novem ber 19, 2012. Deiss failed to file the reporter’s record

. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Heather Deiss APPEAR in person in the courtroom of the Ninth Court of App e als in the Montgomery County Administration Building , 301 North Thompson , 2 nd floor, Conroe , Texas, on January 10, 2013 , at 3:00
p.m., to SHOW CAUSE why she h as fail ed to prepare, certify, and timely file the reporter’s record of Trial Cause No. 11

- 12

- 12933

- CV for Appeal No. 09

- 12

- 00342

- CV. It is further ORDERED that Heather Deiss bring with her and produce in the courtroom of the Ninth Court of App e als in the Montgomery County Administration Building , 301 North Thompson , 2nd floor, Conroe , Texas, on January 10, 2013 , at 3:00
p.m., all exhibits, notes, audio storage devices, or dat a storage devices in her possession or under her control, on which the proceedings in Trial Cause No. 11

- 12

- 12933

- CV were recorded. ORDER ENTERED December 20 , 2012

. PER CURIAM Before the Court e n b anc
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

Wniteb ~tate5 qcourt of §ppeaI5 

for tbe jfeberaI qcircuit 

NOVO NORDISK AlS AND NOVO NORDISK INC., 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

CARACO PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES, 

LTD. AND SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, 

LTD., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

2011-1223 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Michigan in case no. 05-CV-40188, 

Judge Avern Cohn. 

NOVO NORDISK INC. AND NOVO NORDISK AlS, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

PADDOCK LABORATORIES, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee. 
NOVO NORDISK V. PADDOCK LABS 2 

2012-1031 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Minnesota in case no. 10-CV-2199, Judge 

Donovan W. Frank. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 

Novo Nordisk et al. submit responses and motions 

concerning how these cases should proceed. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motions are granted to the extent that the 

stays of the briefing schedules are lifted in the two abovecaptioned appeals. The appellant's opening brief in each 

appeal is due within 40 days of the date of filing of this 

order. 

(2) Appeal 2011-1223 and 2012-1031 will be treated 

as companion cases, i.e., they will be argued consecutively 

before the same merits panel. 

AUG 15 2012 

Date 

cc: Daniel G. Brown, Esq. 

s8 

James F. Hurst, Esq. 

Mark A. Perry, Esq. 

FOR THE COURT 

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

u.s. eoUJt~~PEAlS FOR 

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

AUG 15 201l 

JAN HORBALY 

CLERK
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 91-4606 BETTY LOU BEETS, Petitioner-Appellee Cross-Appellant,

versus JAMES A. COLLINS, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Repsondent-Appellant Cross Appellee.

- - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

- - - - - ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion March 18, 1993, 5 Cir., 1993,

_____ F.2d,

____ ) (August 5, 1993) Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM,

DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, E. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of

supplemental briefs.
NOTICE OF APPEAL PAGE 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

JOHN DOE,

Plaintiff, 

v.

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY and 

VICTOR J. BOSCHINI, JR., in his official 

capacity,

Defendants. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Civil Action No. 4:22-CV-00297 

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Defendants Texas Christian University and Victor J. Boschini, Jr. appeal to the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from the Opinion & Order on Preliminary Injunction 

entered on April 29, 2022 (ECF No. 40). 

Case 4:22-cv-00297-O Document 49 Filed 05/18/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 2450
NOTICE OF APPEAL PAGE 2 

Dated: May 18, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP

By: /s/ Scott D. Schneider 

 Scott D. Schneider, pro hac vice 

 Texas Bar No. 24054023 

 scott.schneider@huschblackwell.com

Samuel P. Rajaratnam

Texas Bar No. 24116935 

sammy.rajaratnam@huschblackwell.com

Caidi Davis, pro hac vice

Texas Bar No. 24121557 

caidi.davis@huschblackwell.com

111 Congress Avenue, Suite 1400 

Austin, Texas 78701 

(512) 472-5456 

(512) 479-1101 (fax) 

 Alex E. Brakefield

 Texas Bar No. 24105523 

 alex.brakefield@huschblackwell.com

1900 N. Pearl Street, Suite 1800 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

(214) 999-6173 

(214) 999-6170 (fax) 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS

Case 4:22-cv-00297-O Document 49 Filed 05/18/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 2451
NOTICE OF APPEAL PAGE 3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that this document was served on the below-listed counsel of record via the Court’s 

CM/ECF electronic filing system in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on 

May 18, 2022. 

Brian Roark 

brian@brianroark.com 

BOTSFORD & ROARK 

1307 West Avenue 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Telephone: (512) 476 – 1900 

Fax: (512) 479 – 8040 

Bryan D. Bruner 

bbruner@bjplaw.com 

Lynne B. Frank 

State Bar No. 24087215 

Lfrank@bjplaw.com 

BRUNER & BRUNER, P.C. 

3700 W. 7th Street 

Fort Worth, Texas 76107 

Telephone: (817) 332-6633 

Facsimile: (817) 332-6619 

H. Dustin Fillmore, III 

dusty@fillmorefirm.com 

THE FILLMORE LAW FIRM, L.L.P. 

201 Main Street, Suite 801 

Fort Worth, Texas 76102 

Telephone: (817) 332-2351 

/s/ Samuel P. Rajaratnam 

Samuel P. Rajaratnam

Case 4:22-cv-00297-O Document 49 Filed 05/18/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 2452
#### STATE v. BEDNARZ et al.

No. 11291.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 30, 1943.

*744Wesley E. Seale, of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

O. F. Burney, of Floresville, for appel-lees.

NORVELL, Justice.

The State of Texas, acting for itself and on behalf of Wilson County and all political subdivisions whose taxes are collected by the Tax Assessor and Collector of said county, brought this suit for the recovery of delinquent real property taxes assessed against 2.2S acres of land situated in the county, and for’ delinquent personal property taxes assessed against certain gin machinery situated on said tract of land.

The judgment rendered had the effect of reducing the amount of taxes theretofore levied against the real property, and denying a recovery upon the personal property assessed.

The State has appealed upon the transcript and asserts that the judgment has no support in the pleadings. The only pleading shown in the transcript is plaintiff’s original petition. The recitals in the judgment clearly indicate that appellees filed no pleadings.

It seems clear that under the provisions of Article 7329, Vernon’s Ann.Civ. Stats., some pleading other than a general denial on the part of appellees would be necessary to support the judgment rendered by the trial court.

The judgment rendered contains numerous recitals as to agreements made by the parties during the course of the trial, but we do not have an “agreed case” before us in accordance with Rule 263, Texas R.C.P., nor does the record present an “agreed statement” as contemplated by Rule 378, R.C.P.

We have considered the record, including the lengthy recitations in the judgment, and it seems that we are confronted with a situation similar to that disclosed in Buchanan v. Jean, Tex.Sup.Ct., 172 S.W.2d 688, 689, wherein Chief Justice Alexander remarked that “the whole proceedings were carried on in such an irregular manner that the case cannot be made to fit into any standard pattern or rule of decision.”

The recitals in the judgment appealed from can not in this case be given the effect of supplying necessary pleadings on the part of appellees. Accordingly, appellant’s points above mentioned are sustained, the judgment reversed and the cause remanded for new trial
Exhibit 99.1 to 10-QSB

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Prologic Management Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James M. Heim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to
the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                             /s/  James M. Heim
                             ---------------------------------
                             James M. Heim
                             Chief Executive Officer
                             Prologic Management Systems, Inc.
                             February 12, 2003

                                                                               1
#### GINN et ux. v. CITY OF TYLER.

No. A-2478.

Supreme Court of Texas.

March 15, 1950.

Pollard, Lawrence & Reeves, Tyler, W. Dewey Lawrence, Tyler, for . petitioners.

Troy Smith, Tyler, Ted Chilcote, Tyler, for, respondent.

PER - CURIAM. ■ '

Application for Writ of Error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Since the ■points presented by the application for ■writ of error involve only questions of the admissibility of evidence, which do not necessarily control the case, the application for writ of error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, Davis v. Williams, 136 Tex. 27, 146 S.W.2d 982.
Order filed, April 29, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NOS. 14-14-00258-CR

 14-14-00259-CR

____________

MARIELA PONCE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1370823 & 1370824

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due April 21, 2014. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Patricia Palmer, the substitute court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

                              The Schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from the financial
                              statements for Independence Tax Credit Plus L.P.
                              IV and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                              to such financial statements

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000940329
<NAME>                        Independence Tax Credit Plus L.P. IV
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         14,860,027
<SECURITIES>                                   22,800,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,151,956
<PP&E>                                         15,551,902
<DEPRECIATION>                                 92,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 56,271,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,259,245
<BONDS>                                        12,865,543
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     42,146,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   56,271,159
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               669,340
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               406,447
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             74,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                188,070
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   188,070
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  5.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [OR-030-01-1220-PA: GP1-0021]

# AGENCY:

National Historic Oregon Trail Interpretive Center, Vale District, Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is given that a meeting of the Advisory Board for the National Historic Oregon Trail Interpretive Center will be held on Tuesday, December 5, 2000 from 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. in the Conference Room at the National Historic Oregon Trail Interpretive Center, Oregon Highway 86, Flagstaff Hill, Baker City, Oregon. Public comments will be received from 11 a.m. to 11:15 a.m., December 5, 2000. Topics to be discussed are the review and approval of the updated Strategic Plan, reports from Coordinators of Subcommittees, and the development of Action Plan and Recommendations for FY2001-2002.

# DATES:

The meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. and run to 12:30 p.m., December 5, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David B. Hunsaker, Bureau of Land Management, National Historic Oregon Trail, Interpretive Center, P.O. Box 987, Baker City, OR 97814, (Telephone 541-523-1845).

Sandy L. Guches,

Acting Vale District Manager.

[FR Doc. 00-28210  Filed 11-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
**Exhibit 13**

** **

**Officer Certifications**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V., a *sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable* organized under the laws of Mexico (the “Company”), does hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge that:

 

The annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: April 30, 2014

 
|   | /s/   Juan Antonio González Moreno   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:   Juan Antonio González Moreno |
|   | Title:   Chief Executive Officer          |

 

Date: April 30, 2014

 
|   | /s/   Homero Huerta Moreno            |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Name:   Homero Huerta Moreno          |
|   | Title:   Chief Administrative Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


 

 Exhibit 10(i)

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 








          We hereby consent to the use in this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement of C.M.
Multi-Account A—Individual or Group Deferred Variable Annuity on Form N-4 (File No. 333-95845) of our report, which includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the use of statutory accounting practices, which practices differ from generally accepted
accounting principles, dated February 25, 1999 relating to the statutory financial statements of C.M. Life Insurance Company, which appear in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us under the caption “Experts” in the
Statement of Additional Information in such Registration Statement.


 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 



Hartford, Connecticut




August 1, 2000