alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP97-346-028]

Take notice that on November 1, 2000, Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans) submitted its stranded gathering surcharge report pursuant to Article IV of the Stipulation and Agreement (Stipulation) filed on January 22, 1999 and amended on March 31, 1999 in the above reference dockets.

Equitrans the purpose of this filing is for Equitrans to report its reconciliation of the amount collected during the surcharge period for standard gathering and the amount Equitrans was authorized to collect under the Stipulation.

Equitrans states that the total net amount collected, including interest, resulted in an under-recovery of $3,501.34. Because of the small amount of the under-recovery, Equitrans states that it is waiving its right to collect the under-recovery and will not direct bill its firm transportation customers for that amount.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the                           ( print page 67727)                        Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before November 13, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-28931  Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
For U.S. citizens, permanent residents, and certain non-citizen U.S. 

corporations, this document constitutes a Certificate of Registration. 

For all others, this document represents a recognition of ownership.

For all holders, for all operations other than as a model aircraft under 

sec. 336 of Pub. L. 112-95, additional safety authority from FAA and 

economic authority from DOT may be required.

Safety guidelines for flying your unmanned aircraft: Small UAS Certificate of Registration

CERTIFICATE HOLDER: 

UAS CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 

ISSUED: EXPIRES:

Federal Aviation

Administration

• Fly below 400 feet

• Never fly near other aircraft

• Keep your UAS within visual 

line of sight

• Keep away from emergency 

responders

• Never fly over stadiums, sports 

events or groups of people

• Never fly under the influence 

of drugs or alcohol

• Never fly within 5 miles of an airport 

without first contacting air traffic 

control and airport authorities

Andrew Burkert

FA3MXLHME4

03/11/2016 03/11/2019
#### SHELTON v. STATE.

No. 25521.

Court of Criminal Appeals *of*Texas.

Nov. 28, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary. The penalty assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of 12 years.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged and waived a jury upon the trial. The. State’s evidence is sufficient to support the conviction.

The record is before this court without any bills of exception complaining of matters of procedure.

The judgment is affirmed.
Case 3:22-cv-00623-S-BK   Document 9   Filed 09/20/22    Page 1 of 1   PageID 55
US Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration, AeroNav Products

Ü

Temporary R-2509N

Graphic Request 16-AWP-3

Temporary R-2509E

Temporary R-2509W
#### Ex parte HOOVER.

No. 25704.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 6, 1952.

Fred Woodard, Corpus Christi, for appellant.

*967John Young, County Atty., Corpus Christi, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Relator was adjudged to be in contempt of court in connection with a child custody matter and remanded to jail for 10 days.

After having been imprisoned for three days, she sought and obtained leave to file in this court her application for habeas corpus to secure her release.

Leave was granted upon the allegation that the punishment assessed was in excess of the maximum provided for a single act of contempt under Art. 1911, R.C.S. and relator was admitted to bail.

It now appears that the order adjudging relator to be in contempt of court has been modified, and the punishment fixed at three days in jail. The modified order further recites that relator has purged herself of the contempt by virtue of having been imprisoned for three days.

The question raised is therefore moot, and the application for habeas corpus is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 232 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 232

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

             Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 232

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             March 24 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, March 
24, 1994, it stand adjourned until noon on Tuesday, April 12, 1994, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of 
business on Friday, March 25, 1994, Saturday, March 26, 1994, Monday, 
March 28, 1994, Tuesday, March 29, 1994, Wednesday, March 30, 1994, or 
Thursday, March 31, 1994, pursuant to a motion made by the majority 
leader or his designee, in accordance with this resolution, it stand 
recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, April 11, 1994, or at such 
time on that day as may be specified by the majority leader or his 
designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the minority leader of 
the House and the minority leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 24, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ADAM DIAZ, §

#01204201, §

Petitioner, §

§

v. § No. 3:22-cv-00847-M (BT)

§

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has taken under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation 

of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated July 28, 2023. The Court has 

reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error and has found none. IT 

IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. Moreover, considering the record in this case, the 

Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. The Court adopts and incorporates by reference the 

Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation filed in this case in support of its 

finding that Petitioner has failed to show (1) reasonable jurists would find this Court’s “assessment 

of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” or (2) reasonable jurists would find “it debatable 

whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” and “debatable 

whether [this Court] was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000).

Case 3:22-cv-00847-M-BT Document 18 Filed 08/22/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1265
2

SO ORDERED this 22nd day of August, 2023.

Case 3:22-cv-00847-M-BT Document 18 Filed 08/22/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1266
#### Marguerite K. Goldstein et al., as Executors of Louis W. Goldstein, Deceased, et al., Appellants, *v.*Speed Products Co., Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

October 25, 1957.

*Joseph Heller*for appellants.

*Samuel Bushwick*for respondent.

The final order should be affirmed, with $25 costs. No opinion.

Pette, Hart and Di Giovanna, JJ., concur.

Final order affirmed, etc.
<PAGE>   1



                              AMRESCO CAPITAL TRUST

                   EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



  AMREIT I, Inc.  (a Delaware corporation)
  AMREIT II, Inc.  (a Nevada corporation)
  AMREIT CMBS I, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
  ACT Holdings, Inc.  (a Georgia corporation)
  ACT Equities, Inc.  (a Georgia corporation)
  SC/ACT Investors, L.P.  (a Georgia limited partnership)
  SC/ACT Equities, LLC  (a Texas limited liability company)
  Arlington-Riverview Village, L.P.  (a Texas limited partnership)
  Heritage Heights-Grapevine, L.P.  (a Texas limited partnership)
  Flowermound-The Highlands, L.P.  (a Texas limited partnership)
  Fort Worth-Sycamore Square, L.P.  (a Texas limited partnership)
  Richardson-Custer Creek Village, L.P.  (a Texas limited partnership)




                                       1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                              Revolving Credit Note

$22,429,906.53                                                     July 29, 1999

      ACT Manufacturing, Inc. and CMC Industries, Inc. (collectively, the
"Borrowers"), for value received, hereby jointly and severally promise to pay to
the order of The Chase Manhattan Bank (the "Lender") at the office of The Chase
Manhattan Bank at One Chase Square, Rochester, New York 14643, for the account
of such Lender, the principal sum of Twenty-Two Million Four Hundred Twenty-Nine
Thousand Nine Hundred Six Dollars and 53/100 ($22,429,906.53) or, if less, the
amount of Revolving Credit Loans loaned by the Lender to the Borrowers pursuant
to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement referred to below, in lawful money
of the United States of America and in immediately available funds, on the
date(s) and in the manner provided in said Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement. The Borrowers also promise to pay interest on the unpaid principal
balance hereof, for the period such balance is outstanding, at said principal
office for the account of said Lender, in like money, at the rates of interest
as provided in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement described below, on the
date(s) and in the manner provided in said Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement.

      This is one of the Notes referred to in that certain Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement (as amended from time to time the "Credit Agreement") dated as
of July 29, 1999 among the Borrowers, the Subsidiary Guarantor named therein,
the Lenders named therein (including the Lender), and The Chase Manhattan Bank,
as Agent, and evidences the Revolving Credit Loans made by the Lender to the
Borrowers thereunder. All terms not defined herein shall have the meanings given
to them in the Credit Agreement.

      The Credit Agreement provides for the acceleration of the maturity of
principal upon the occurrence and during the continuance of certain Events of
Default and for prepayments on the terms and conditions specified therein.

      The Borrowers waive presentment, notice of dishonor, protest and any other
notice or formality with respect to this Note.
<PAGE>

      This Note shall be governed by, and interpreted and construed in
accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.

ATTEST:                                   ACT MANUFACTURING, INC.


By:                                       By:   /s/ Jeffrey B. Lavin
   ------------------------------            -----------------------------------
Name:                                     Name:       Jeffrey B. Lavin
                                          Title:      Chief Financial Officer


ATTEST:                                   CMC INDUSTRIES, INC.


By:                                       By:   /s/ Jeffrey B. Lavin
   ------------------------------            -----------------------------------
Name:                                     Name:       Jeffrey B. Lavin
                                          Title:      Chief Financial Officer
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

d1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

138616(48)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138616 COA: 281466 Wayne CC: 06-011689-01 DESHON ARRON MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s August 6, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously.
Faulk, Scott (OST) From: 

# - -**·:~.-:-;** 

# c- Michael Reeve, Reeve Air Alaska <mreeve@reevecorp.com> •. -**,!.:~:** :_.t; • Wednesday, April 08, 2015 4:20PM · - -**~-::.·** ,_;__._.- .-.--::. Sent: To: Faulk, Scott (OST) Subject: Fwd: fleights

-------- Forwarded Message

-------- Subject:fleights Date:Wed, 8 Apr 2015 10:22:08-0800 From:Thelma Vlasoff <joyevermore@hotmail.com> To:mreeve@reevecorp.com <mreeve@reevecorp.com>
Good day I am writing to request that Reeve's Air continue to fly to and from Anchorage,Ak to Tatitlek. Mike is very professianl and kind. Is there to work with us when we would like drop offfreight.
Thank you Thelma Vlasoff Tatitlek,ak No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG

- www.avg.com Version: 2015.0.5751 /Virus Database: 4315/9395- Release Date: 03/27115 Internal Virus Database is out ofdate.

1 . .,._ ..**:::1~** ':"--, .:.,..;, ..! '·· ,\
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Utah Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Utah Number of Operable Refineries as of January 1 (Number of Elements)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 8      | 8      | 8      | 7      | 6      | 6      | 6      | 6     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 6      | 6      | 6      | 6      | 6      | 5      | NA     | 5      | NA     | 5     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 266 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 266

 Expressing the sense of the Congress concerning the need to preserve 
      the traditional lifeways in certain Alaska Native villages.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 1994

  Mr. Young of Alaska submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress concerning the need to preserve 
      the traditional lifeways in certain Alaska Native villages.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in recognition of the prohibitive financial burden placed upon 
Alaska Native subsistence whaling captains by international obligations 
ratified by the United States, it is the sense of the Congress that the 
utmost consideration should be given to clarify Federal tax law to 
allow a reasonable Federal charitable tax deduction for the reasonable 
and necessary expenses of such captains related to their conduct of the 
centuries old subsistence whaling hunt as a charitable contribution 
activity for the benefit of their native community, donations to which 
are deductible under section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
                                 <all>
```
Anaconda-Pintler - Worst - Total Extinction Anaconda-Pintler - Worst - SO4 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

SO4

Extinction

SULA1 NIA 2001 24 35.73 SULA1 NIA 2001 24 4.78

SULA1 NIA 2002 24 34.21 SULA1 NIA 2002 24 4.63

SULA1 NIA 2003 23 66.3 SULA1 NIA 2003 23 4.78

SULA1 NIA 2004 24 33.84 SULA1 NIA 2004 24 5.14

170.08 Total 19.33 Total

42.52 Average 4.8325 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Sulfate Share of Particle Light Extinction 11%

Anaconda-Pintler - Best - Total Extinction Anaconda-Pintler - Best - SO4 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

SO4

Extinction

SULA1 NIA 2001 23 13.62 SULA1 NIA 2001 23 1.32

SULA1 NIA 2002 23 13.15 SULA1 NIA 2002 23 1.14

SULA1 NIA 2003 22 11.99 SULA1 NIA 2003 22 0.69

SULA1 NIA 2004 23 13.19 SULA1 NIA 2004 23 1.23

51.95 Total 4.38 Total

12.9875 Average 1.095 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Sulfate Share of Particle Light Extinction 8%

Gates of the Mountains - Worst - Total Extinction Gates of the Mountains - Worst - SO4 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

SO4

Extinction

GAMO1 NIA 2001 24 30.3 GAMO1 NIA 2001 24 5.97

GAMO1 NIA 2002 23 29.29 GAMO1 NIA 2002 23 5.07

GAMO1 NIA 2003 22 37.15 GAMO1 NIA 2003 22 5.1

GAMO1 NIA 2004 23 30.65 GAMO1 NIA 2004 23 5.5

127.39 Total 21.64 Total

31.8475 Average 5.41 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Sulfate Share of Particle Light Extinction 17%

Gates of the Mountains - Best - Total Extinction Gates of the Mountains - Best - SO4 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

SO4

Extinction

GAMO1 NIA 2001 23 12.03 GAMO1 NIA 2001 23 1.22

GAMO1 NIA 2002 22 12.56 GAMO1 NIA 2002 22 1.24

GAMO1 NIA 2003 21 10.92 GAMO1 NIA 2003 21 0.64

GAMO1 NIA 2004 22 12.13 GAMO1 NIA 2004 22 0.94

47.64 Total 4.04 Total

11.91 Average 1.01 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Sulfate Share of Particle Light Extinction 8%