alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                   5 
<LEGEND>  
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated   balance   sheet,   consolidated   statement  of  operations   and
consolidated statement of cash flows included in the Company's Form 10-Q for the
period  ended March 27,  1998,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-27-1998
<CASH>                                       21,590
<SECURITIES>                                 74,666
<RECEIVABLES>                                 5,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1
<INVENTORY>                                   5,783
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            116,274
<PP&E>                                       12,216
<DEPRECIATION>                                4,760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              123,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        15,826
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        257
<OTHER-SE>                                  107,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                107,904
<SALES>                                      71,055
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             71,055
<CGS>                                        24,605
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                60,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              13,540
<INCOME-TAX>                                  5,010
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  8,530
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.31
                                                 

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Surge Global Energy, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on April 17, 2007 (the “Report”), I, David
      Perez, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







By:  /s/
      David Perez


David
      Perez


Chairman
      of the Board and


Chief
      Executive Officer


April
      17,
      2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM KALAN GOLD
CORP. UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE RELATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BE REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,987
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,979,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,990,416
<PP&E>                                         942,491
<DEPRECIATION>                                 389,865
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,088,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          918,814
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           950
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,356,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,088,876
<SALES>                                        702,756
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               744,278
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  291,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,578
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                346,233
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            346,233
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   346,233
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
Exhibit 11.1

                                                    PSINet Inc.
                                                 and Subsidiaries

                                   Calculation of Loss per Share (Unaudited) (1)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                                                                          March 31, 1997
                                                                                                          --------------
<S>                                                                                                          <C>          
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Common stock:
         Shares outstanding at beginning of period.....................................................        40,113,234
         Weighted average shares issued during the three months ended March 31, 1997
         (60,268 shares) ..............................................................................            44,847
                                                                                                          ---------------

                                                                                                               40,158,081
                                                                                                           ==============
Net loss   ............................................................................................      $ (9,269,000)
                                                                                                           ==============

Loss per share (unaudited)   ..........................................................................      $      (0.23)
                                                                                                           ==============

=========================================================================================================================
</TABLE>

(1) For a discussion of loss per share, see Note 2 of the Notes to the
    Consolidated Financial Statements.


                                       15
#### Carmel Company, Appellant, *v.*Greater Buffalo Press, Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 6, 1956.

*Per Curiam.*

The final order should be affirmed, with $25 costs.

Hofstabter, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Final order affirmed.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 177

Calling for the United States to amend the London Convention to ban

the ocean dumping of low-level radioactive waste, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 8, 1993

Mr. WELDON (for himself, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. STUDDS, Mr. FIELDS of Texas,

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. LAUGHLIN, Mr. RAVENEL, Mr.

COBLE, Mr. MCCLOSKEY, Ms. SCHENK, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. COPPERSMITH,

Mr. HEFLEY, Mrs. FOWLER, Mr. GOSS, Mr. SKEEN, and Mr. SMITH of

Texas) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Calling for the United States to amend the London Convention to ban the ocean dumping of low-level radioactive

waste, and for other purposes.

Whereas the world’s oceans are a sensitive and valuable natural resource;

Whereas the dynamic nature of the world’s oceans tends to

disperse radioactive contamination;

Whereas radioactivity within the ocean environment can become incorporated into marine organisms and consequently into marine food chains;

Whereas the effects of radioactivity in the marine environment are poorly understood and require further study;
2

HCON 177 IH

Whereas the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, known as

the London Convention, has banned the ocean dumping

of high-level radioactive waste since 1975;

Whereas a voluntary international moratorium on the ocean

dumping of low-level radioactive waste has been in effect

since 1983;

Whereas the governments of Argentina, Australia, Brazil,

Chile, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Iceland, Ireland,

Italy, Japan, Malta, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand,

Papua New Guinea, Poland, Portugal, Solomon Islands,

Spain, and Sweden have declared their support for

amending the London Convention to ban ocean dumping

of low-level radioactive waste; and

Whereas on November 2, 1993, the Administration announced its support for amending the London Convention

to ban low-level ocean dumping of radioactive waste:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) The United States should seek, through ap4 propriate diplomatic means, an international agree5 ment to—

6 (A) ban the deliberate ocean dumping of

7 low-level radioactive waste; and

8 (B) encourage a periodic international sci9 entific review of the environmental impacts of

10 such ocean dumping.
3

HCON 177 IH

1 (2) The United States, through appropriate

2 diplomatic means, should urge all nations to comply

3 with existing and future international agreements

4 prohibiting the deliberate ocean dumping of low- and

5 high-level radioactive waste.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Power & Equipment Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark J.
Wright, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                                       /s/ Mark J. Wright
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Name: Mark J. Wright
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       Date: December 9, 2003



                  A signed original of the written statements required by
Section 906 has been provided to Western Power & Equipment Corp. and will be
retained by Western Power & Equipment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1648

_____________________________ S.B., the N atural M other of J.K.B., G.K.R.B., K.M.B
., Minor Children
, Appellant,

v.

D EPARTMENT OF C HILDREN AND F AMILIES , Appelle e.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County

. William W. Blue , Judge

. August 20, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. See J.B. v. Fla. Dep’t of Children & Families , 170 So. 3d 780 (Fla. 2015) (holding that a motion alleg ing ineffective assistance of counsel in a termination of parental rights proceeding is deemed denied twenty

- five days after the motion is filed)

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and K ELSEY and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until dispo sition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

David J. Joffe of Joffe Law, P.A., Fort Lauderdale
, for Appellant
, and S.B., pro se, Appellant

. Ward L. Metzger, Appellate Counsel, Department of Children and Families, Jacksonville
, for Appellee.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C22 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C22

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

March 1, 2016

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith  

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### FOLEY v. STATE.

No. 25417.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 24, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

. George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the penalty is a fine of $100.00.

In the absence of a proper notice of appeal in the record, this court is without jurisdiction to consider the same.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.
AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

VENTURA COUNTY APCD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 1 

0 I. GENERAL INFORMATION  District: Ventura County APCD Rule Nos.: 74.31 and 23 Date Adopted: November 12, 2

 Rule Titles: Metalworking Fluids and Direct Contact Lubricants (74.31), Exemptions from Permit (23)  Date Submitted to ARB: December 12, 2013 If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended: Rule 23 on Apr Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? (X) Yes ( ) No If NO, do not complete rem

 District Contact: Stan Cowen Phone No.: 805/645-1408 

 Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: ( X) New Rule (X) Amended: New Rule 74.31 will 

metalworking fluids and direct contact lubricants at metalworking operations. Amended Rule 23 will clarify th

processes impacted by the ROC Content requirements of Rule 74.31. Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Circle): ROG NOx SO2 PM10 CO TAC

 II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS 

 Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emission. Attach reference(s) for e

 information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emissions information provided below was determined. See staff report Append

Net Effect on Emissions: ( ) Increase (X) Decrease ( ) N/A No impact on emissions. See attached staff rcalculations. The net effect of the three rules is to reduce ROC emissions by 41 tons per year. 

 II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS  Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP (Control Measure ) for this source category: 2011 Triennial Assessme

ROC emission reductions estimated a

 Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: 

 Future Y

Year 

Tons/year Reductions 

 2012 Baseline 

Tons/year 

Subject to Rule 

Control 

Level 

Percent 

Control 

Contr

Leve

2014 41 / 76 = 0.54 * 100 = 54% 1.00 - 0.5
AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

VENTURA COUNTY APCD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2 

 III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS  District is: ( ) Attainment (X) Nonattainment ( ) Split  Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule: 300  Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %  Number of Large (>100 TPY) Sources Controlled: None Percent in Nonattainment Area: Not Applicable 

 IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY  Do the Rules Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes. 

 V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS 

RULE 74.31 (Metalworking Fluids and Direct Contact Lubricants) Requirements include: 

 Emission Limits (ROC Content Limits: Section B.1  Prohibition of Sale: Section B.3  Recordkeeping: Section B.5  Test Methods: Section D  Exemptions: Section C 

 VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN  (X) No Impact ( ) Impacts RFP ( ) Impacts attainment 

Discussion: Amendments to Rule 74.31 will reduce ROC emissions for Ventura County’s efforts towa

ozone standard. Therefore, RFP will be furthered by amendments to both rules.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6302

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

PHONEPADITH THADSAMANY,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, 

District Judge. (3:06-cr-00178-FDW-CH-4; 3:09-cv-00332-FDW)

Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: June 30, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phonepadith Thadsamany, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Phonepadith Thadsamany seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Thadsamany has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

CHARLES E. SCOTT, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

v. No. 4:22-cv-0326-P

 

MORAY OF THE CITY

FROWTHER, et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a

Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s

Recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the

undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the

Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions

of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

SO ORDERED this 29th day of June, 2022.

Case 4:22-cv-00326-P Document 9 Filed 06/29/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 24
#### SMITH v. STATE.

No. 25244.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 28, 1951.

See also 218 S.W.2d 851.

No attorney' on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty, of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for possession -of untaxed liquor. The court received his plea of “guilty” and assessed his punishment at a fine of One Hundred Dollars.

The caption, in the transcript in this record does not show the date of convening nor the date of adjournment of the term of court at which this case was tried. This is necessary to confer jurisdiction on this Court. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. ■
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-40907 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. RODERRETTE DEWRAYNE MCCLURE, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:11-CR-38-1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appoin t e d t o represent R oderrette Dewrayne McClure has m oved for leave to withdra w a nd has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 ( 1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th C ir. 2011). McClure has filed a r e s p o n se. We have r eviewed counsel’s brief a nd the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well

as McClure’s response. We concur with counsel’s asses s m e n t t h a t the appeal presents no nonfrivo l o u s issue for appellate review. Accordingly, c ounsel’s U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Decem ber 10, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-40907 Document: 00512466992 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/10/2013No. 12-40907

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused f rom further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS D ISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-40907 Document: 00512466992 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/10/2013