alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.6


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                 ADVANCED REMOTE COMMUNICATIONS SOLUTIONS, INC.

The undersigned certify that:

1. They are the  president  and  secretary,  respectively,  of  Advanced  Remote
Communications Solutions, Inc., a California corporation.

2.  Article I of the Amended and  Restated  Articles  of  Incorporation  of this
corporation is amended to read as follows:

                                    ARTICLE I

The name of this corporation is Advanced Remote Communication Solutions, Inc.

3. The foregoing amendment of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
has been duly approved by the board of directors of the corporation.

4. The foregoing amendment of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
has been duly approved by the required vote of  shareholders  of the corporation
in accordance with Section 902,  California  Corporations Code. The total number
of outstanding  shares of the  corporation  is 18,852,508.  The number of shares
voting in favor of the  amendment  equaled or exceeded  the vote  required.  The
percentage vote required was more than 50%.

We further  declare  under  penalty  of  perjury  under the laws of the State of
California  that the matters set forth in this  Certificate are true and correct
of our own knowledge.


Dated:  May  15, 2000                     /s/ Michael L. Silverman
                                          Michael L. Silverman, President


                                          /s/ Dean Kernus
                                          Dean Kernus, Secretary
L.S. DISTF,ICT CCL?T

NORTiiER\ DIS-:X i['t' rf]j iF\-1s

FJLSD -i

United States District Court

T'ORTHE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DTVISION

UMTED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JACOBTE DEON CRAWFORD (1)

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3 :22-CR-00 I 78-S

REPORT AI\[D RECOMMEI{DATION CONCERNING PLEA OT'GI'ILTY

JACOBIE DEON CRAWT'ORD (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir.

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRnI. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count Two of the

Indictment, fiIed May 3,2022. After cautioning and examining JACOBE DEON CRAWI'ORD (1) under oath

conceming each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary

and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such

offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted and that JACOBIE DEON CRAWT'ORD (1) be

adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. S 922GXl), Possession of a X'irearm by a Convicted Felonrand have sentence imposed

accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the Distict Judge:

{ The Defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

tr The Defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 31a3(a)(1) unless the Cotrt finds by clear and

convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other penon or the community

if released.

tr The Government does not oppose release.

tr The Defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

tr I frnd by clear and convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other

penion or the community if released and should therefore be released under l8 U.S.C. $ 3142(b) or (c).

tr The Govemment oPposes release.

tr The Defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

tr If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the

Government.

tr The Defendant must be ordered detained pr:rsuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 3143(aX2) unless: (l{a) the Court finds there is

a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or. (b) the Government has

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown

under $ 3 145(c) why the Defendant should not be detained; and (2) the Court finds convincing evidence

ifreleased. that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a

SIGNED March 14,2023.

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (la) days from the date of its

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States

Distict Judge. 28 U.S.c. $636(bXlXB).

ITT

$

$

$

$

$

Case 3:22-cr-00178-S Document 30 Filed 03/14/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 57
#### McGILL v. STATE.

No. 26074.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 26, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $125.

Officer Tye testified that on the day charged in the information he observed an automobile weaving from one side of the road to the other, that he followed said automobile, brought it to a stop, and observed that appellant, who was the driver thereof, was intoxicated. He further testified that he searched the automobile in question and found an unopened quart of whiskey and an empty “one-half bottle of whiskey” on the floor board, after which he arrested the appellant and placed him in jail.

Appellant did not testify, nor did he offer any witnesses in his behalf.

Appellant’s principal complaints grow out of the testimony of the arresting officer as *668to appellant’s condition at the time of his arrest and incarceration.

This testimony was clearly admissible. Recently, in Clifton v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 246 S.W.2d 201, 203, we said:

> “However, for the purpose of clarification, it appears that appellant is laboring under the impression that no witness may.be allowed to testify as to anything he observed subsequent to the moment of arrest. In this, he is mistaken. It has long been the holding of this Court that, ‘If such acts or declarations were part of the res gestae they are admissible notwithstanding the fact that they may not be admissible as confessions or as admissions, for the rule of res gestae is independent of, superior to and cannot be limited by the rules relating to confessions or admissions after arrest.’ 18 Tex.Juris., Sec. 193, p. 313.”

Finding the evidence sufficient to support the conviction and no reversible error appearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### Ex parte SCHELLINGER.

No. 26437.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 8, 1953.

*578No attorney on appeal.

Wesley Dice, State’s- Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

Relator, an inmate of the penitentiary, seeks his discharge by writ of habeas corpus, alleging that the two offenses set forth in the indictment upon which he was convicted were not offenses of the same nature as defined by Article 62, P.C., and that, therefore, a conviction on such indictment is void.

Relator was convicted in the Criminal District Court of Harris County upon an indictment charging a primary offense of felony theft and alleging a prior conviction of the felony offense of defrauding by obtaining things of value with a worthless check.

The verdict of the jury found the relator guilty of the primary offense and that he had been previously convicted as alleged. The court assessed the punishment at ten years, in compliance with Article 62, P.C.

The gist of both the offense of felony theft and of defrauding by obtaining things of value with a worthless- check is the fraudulent acquisition of property belonging to another. The same facts may often support a. conviction of either theft or of some other form of unlawful acquisition of property.

By the terms of Article 1549, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., where property is obtained in such manner that the acquisition thereof constitutes both swindling and some other offense, prosecution may be maintained for swindling or for another offense committed in the unlawful acquisition of the property.

In Gibbs v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 253 S.W.2d 1002, we held that where the evidence would support a conviction for the fraudulent acquisition of property toy the giving of a worthless check or a conviction for theft, the State might elect, under the terms of the above Act, to proceed on either charge.

We hold that, because of the common gist of the two offenses, theft and defrauding by obtaining property by the giving of a worthless check .are offenses of the same nature as that term is used in Article 62, P.C.

The application for writ of habeas corpus is denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-4407

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

and

KIRELL FRANCIS TAYLOR, a/k/a Sadeeq Abdul Al

Haqq; Dr. Sadeeq Abdul Al Haqq Kirell,

Intervenor - Appellant,

versus

ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI, a/k/a Shaqil, a/k/a Abu

Khalid al Sahrawi,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (1:01-cr-00455-LMB)

Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 19, 2006

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kirell Francis Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kirell Francis Taylor appeals a district court order

denying his motion to intervene. We agree with the district court

that the motion was frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Taylor’s

motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss his appeal as

frivolous. We also deny his motion for an injunction. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
M

TREA

S

URY

Font: Times Bold / Cheltenham Bold 

Deep Blue: Pantone 290/P107-8C [Web: #005895]

Light Blue: Pantone 292C [Web: #3698D4] 

Gold: PMS 610C [Web: #E7D468]

SEAL EXAMPLE

SEAL, SINGLE INK ALTERNATES

THE

D

EPARTMENT OF THE TREA

S

URY

1789

Single Color, Black [Web: #000000] 

Single Color, Blue: Pantone 290/P107-8C [Web: #005895] 

Single Color, Green, Pantone 394C [Web: #006937]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          63,086
<SECURITIES>                                    36,217
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,139
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,655)
<INVENTORY>                                        701
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,046
<PP&E>                                          26,941
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (10,372)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,755
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       133,110
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,103
<SALES>                                        119,963
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,963
<CGS>                                           18,639
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,422
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (3,689)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,591
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,273
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,318
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,318
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

STRICTLY PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Mr. J Williams
Financial Director
Adaytum KPS Software Limited
Castlegate
Tower Hill
Bristol BS2 0JA

Your Ref:.                    Our Ref ACS/JEB               Tuesday, 11 May 1999

Dear James,

OVERDRAFT FACILITY

I promised to write to confirm the revised overdraft arrangements agreed last
Friday.

Can I begin by saying that I was most impressed with your new offices at
Castlegate and it is clear that the efficiency benefits from the improved
environment are already showing through.

I know that you arc all very pleased with the revenue levels achieved over the
last 2 months and if, as anticipated, these continue through to the financial
year end, then the out-turn figures should show a positive position. However, to
the end of March the combined figures show a pre-tax loss of around L260k and
the net worth has been croded by the various adjustments made at the 03.98
year-end.

As explained, against the background of the year to date results, I am not in a
position to put a loan in place at the present time and we agreed that it would
be appropriate to review the position again in 3 months. I mentioned that any
loan would have to be linked to financial performance covenants and we would
have to be satisfied that these would be achievable at the outset.

In the meantime I recognise that the underlying trading performance is good and
the debtor book provides adequate security. I am happy therefore to confirm that
I am prepared to allow additional overdraft tolerance of L50k above the present
limit of L200k to cover your likely peak requirements. I would anticipate that
the account would continue to show a full monthly swing.

An arrangement fee of L125 will be charged to cover the additional support and
this is based on 1% for 3 months.

<PAGE>

The facility is conditional upon the continued delivery of prompt management
accounts and debtor schedules to evidence the adequacy of the security cover.

I have in mind contacting you again at the beginning of August when hopefully
you will have a firm indication of the year-end results and budgets for
1999/2000.

Yours sincerely,

/s/ Carl Stafford

CARL STAFFORD
Manager


                                      -2-
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 The
        undersigned, Bami Bastani, President and Chief Executive Officer of ANADIGICS,
        Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report of the Company
        on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934
        and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
 
 
 Dated:
        May 7, 2007
 By:
              /s/
                  Bami BastaniBami
                  BastaniPresident
                  andChief
                  Executive Officer
 
 This
        certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated
        by
        reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act
        of
        1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
        by reference.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained
        by
        ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
        its
        staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3548 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3548

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 25, 2014

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title XII of the Public Health Service Act to expand the 
    definition of trauma to include thermal, electrical, chemical, 
                radioactive, and other extrinsic agents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Trauma Care Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. TRAUMA DEFINITION.

    (a) Revised Definition Under Trauma Systems Grants Programs.--
Paragraph (4) of section 1231 of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 300d-31) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(4) Trauma.--The term `trauma' means an injury resulting 
        from exposure to--
                    ``(A) a mechanical force; or
                    ``(B) another extrinsic agent, including an 
                extrinsic agent that is thermal, electrical, chemical, 
                or radioactive.''.
    (b) Revised Definition Under Interagency Program for Trauma 
Research.--Paragraph (3) of section 1261(h) of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d-61(h)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(3) The term `trauma' means an injury resulting from 
        exposure to--
                    ``(A) a mechanical force; or
                    ``(B) another extrinsic agent, including an 
                extrinsic agent that is thermal, electrical, chemical, 
                or radioactive.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 24, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofDecember 1, 2014, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES,INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General MasterServicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSBas NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDERSERVICES LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION asCertificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator, and Custodian, and WILMINGTONTRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2014-LC18 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the the Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0486 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. RANDY JOE FISH,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 3 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 28 2024

02/28/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0486
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              <blank>
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         114,309
<SECURITIES>                                 1,210,726
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,671,260
<ALLOWANCES>                                   <blank>
<INVENTORY>                                  3,358,353
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,913,112
<PP&E>                                         691,171
<DEPRECIATION>                                 218,014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,745,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,785,157
<BONDS>                                        <blank>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          <blank>
<PREFERRED>                                    <blank>
<COMMON>                                         2,384
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,726,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,745,989
<SALES>                                      7,406,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,406,439
<CGS>                                        4,776,085
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,469,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               <blank>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               <blank>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             197,789
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (36,475)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (48,875)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 <blank>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                <blank>
<CHANGES>                                      <blank>
<NET-INCOME>                                   (48,875)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  <blank>
        


</TABLE>
#### BROWN v. STATE.

No. 25034.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 13, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of driving an automobile upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and the jury assessed his punishment at a fine of $100.00 and 10 days •confinement in the county jail.

There are no bills of exception nor a statement of facts in the record. All other proceedings appear to be regular, therefore nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.