alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water 

January 27, 2010 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Basis for Expedited Approval of Standard Methods 6640 B and 6640 B-01 

for the Analysis of Dalapon 

FROM: Glynda Smith, Chemist 

Technical Support Center 

TO: The Record 

This memo documents the reviews conducted on Standard Methods 6640 B and 6640 B01 for the determination of dalapon in drinking water. It provides the background 

information on why EPA is approving these methods using the expedited methods 

approval process. 

Standard Method 6640 B published in the 21st edition of Standard Methods for the 

Analysis of Water and Wastewater: 

 EPA Method 515.4, Revision 1.0 was used as the basis for comparison because it 

is currently cited in the drinking water regulations at 40 CFR 141.24(e)(1) for dalapon. 

Standard Method 6640 B was developed directly from EPA Method 515.4, Revision 1.0 

and thus uses the identical sample collection/handling protocols, sample preparation and 

derivatization steps, chromatographic conditions (specifically the use of a secondary 

confirmation column) and electron capture detection. The methods have the same quality 

control requirements and the method performance data (detection levels, accuracy and 

precision) are identical. Therefore, Standard Method 6640 B is equally as effective as 

EPA Method 515.4, Revision 1.0 in determining dalapon concentrations in drinking 

water. 

Standard Method 6640 B-01 published online at http://www.standardmethods.org: 

 The version published online is identical to the version published in the 21st

edition (6640 B) and thus equally effective as Method 515.4, Revision 1.0 in determining 

dalapon concentrations in drinking water.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of 8point3 Energy Partners LP (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended November 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bryan Schumaker, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of 8point3 General Partner, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.




Date:March 21, 2018By:/s/ BRYAN SCHUMAKERBryan SchumakerChief Financial Officer and Interim Chief Accounting Officerof 8point3 General Partner, LLC(Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

                              Revolving Credit Note

$18,691,588.79                                                     July 29, 1999

      ACT Manufacturing, Inc. and CMC Industries, Inc. (collectively, the
"Borrowers"), for value received, hereby jointly and severally promise to pay to
the order of Firstar Bank, N.A. (the "Lender") at the office of The Chase
Manhattan Bank at One Chase Square, Rochester, New York 14643, for the account
of such Lender, the principal sum of Eighteen Million Six Hundred Ninety-One
Thousand Five Hundred Eighty-Eight Dollars and 79/100 ($18,691,588.79) or, if
less, the amount of Revolving Credit Loans loaned by the Lender to the Borrowers
pursuant to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement referred to below, in
lawful money of the United States of America and in immediately available funds,
on the date(s) and in the manner provided in said Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement. The Borrowers also promise to pay interest on the unpaid principal
balance hereof, for the period such balance is outstanding, at said principal
office for the account of said Lender, in like money, at the rates of interest
as provided in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement described below, on the
date(s) and in the manner provided in said Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement.

      This is one of the Notes referred to in that certain Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement (as amended from time to time the "Credit Agreement") dated as
of July 29, 1999 among the Borrowers, the Subsidiary Guarantor named therein,
the Lenders named therein (including the Lender), and The Chase Manhattan Bank,
as Agent, and evidences the Revolving Credit Loans made by the Lender to the
Borrowers thereunder. All terms not defined herein shall have the meanings given
to them in the Credit Agreement.

      The Credit Agreement provides for the acceleration of the maturity of
principal upon the occurrence and during the continuance of certain Events of
Default and for prepayments on the terms and conditions specified therein.

      The Borrowers waive presentment, notice of dishonor, protest and any other
notice or formality with respect to this Note.
<PAGE>

      This Note shall be governed by, and interpreted and construed in
accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.

ATTEST:                                   ACT MANUFACTURING, INC.


By:                                       By:   /s/ Jeffrey B. Lavin
   ------------------------------            -----------------------------------
Name:                                     Name:       Jeffrey B. Lavin
                                          Title:      Chief Financial Officer


ATTEST:                                   CMC INDUSTRIES, INC.


By:                                       By:   /s/ Jeffrey B. Lavin
   ------------------------------            -----------------------------------
Name:                                     Name:       Jeffrey B. Lavin
                                          Title:      Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 219 (Monday, November 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28995]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Public Notice For Waiver of Aeronautical Land-Use Assurance North 
Adams Airport, North Adams, Massachusetts

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comments; Notice of intent to waiver with 
respect to land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is considering a proposal that a portion of the 
airport (approximately 1.35 acres located on Airport Access Road) is 
not needed for aeronautical use, as shown on the Airport Layout Plan. 
There appear to be no impacts to the airports by allowing the airport 
the use of the land under a 25 year lease, with a 10 year extension, 
for professional and general business office purposes. The land was 
acquired by the airport under FAA Project No. 9-19-002-901 (portion of 
parcel 3).
    In accordance with section 47107(h) of title 49, United States 
Code, the notice is required to be published in the Federal Register 30 
days before modifying the land-use assurance that requires the property 
to be used for an aeronautical purposes.
    The purpose of this lease is to make use of surplus land to 
generate needed revenue for the operations and maintenance of the 
airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 13, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address: Mr. William Cronan, Special Projects 
Officer, Federal Aviation Administration, Airports Division, 12 New 
England Executive Park, Burlington Massachusetts 01803.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Cronan, Special Projects 
Officer, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, Massachusetts 
01803. Telephone number 781-238-7610/Fax number 781-238-7608. Documents 
reflecting the FAA action may be reviewed at the 16 New England 
Executive Park, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803 or at the North Adams 
and Harriman Airport, North Adams, Massachusetts.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces that the FAA intends 
to authorize the release of the subject airports property at the North 
Adams and Harriman Airport, North Adams, Massachusetts. The disposition 
of proceeds from the leasing of the airport property will be in 
accordance with FAA's policy and procedures concerning the use of the 
airport revenue, published in the Federal Register on February 16, 
1999.

    Issued in Burlington Massachusetts on November 3, 2000.
Vincent A. Scarano,
Manager, Airports Division, New England Region.
[FR Doc. 00-28995 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
H. Con. Res. 238 Agreed to June 7, 1994

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Association’’) shall be

permitted to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races, on

the Capitol grounds on July 16, 1994, or on such other date as

the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President

pro tempore of the Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be

free of admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere

with the needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by

the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except

that the Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses

and liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized

to erect upon the Capitol grounds, subject to the approval of the

Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices,

and other related structures and equipment as may be required

for the event to be carried out under this resolution.
H. Con. Res. 238—2

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board

are authorized to make any such additional arrangements that

may be required to carry out the event under this resolution.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2863]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Changes in the National Handbook of 
Conservation Practices

AGENCY:  Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.

ACTION:  Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  Notice is hereby given of the intention of NRCS to issue a 
series of new or revised conservation practice standards in its 
National Handbook of Conservation Practices. These standards include 
Alley Cropping, Constructed Wetland, Firebreak, Forest Site 
Preparation, Forest Stand Improvement, Forest Trails and Landings, 
Prescribed Burning, Riparian Forest Buffer, Spring Development, Tree/
Shrub Establishment, Tree/Shrub Pruning, Use Exclusion, Windbreak/
Shelterbelt Establishment, and Windbreak/Shelterbelt Renovation. These 
standards are used to convey national guidance when developing Field 
Office Technical Guide Standards used in the States. NRCS State 
Conservationists who choose to adopt these practices for use within 
their States will incorporate them into Section IV of their Field 
Office Technical Guide. These practices may be used in conservation 
systems that treat highly erodible land or on land determined to be 
wetland.

DATES:  Comments will be received on or before April 10, 2000. T his 
series of new or revised conservation practice standards will be 
adopted after the close of the 60-day period.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Single copies of these standards are 
available from NRCS-CED in Washington, D.C. Submit individual inquiries 
and return any comments in writing to William Hughey, National 
Agricultural Engineer, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Post 
Office Box 2890, Room 6139-S, Washington, D.C. 20013-2890. Telephone 
Number 202-720-5023. The standards are also available and can be 
downloaded from the Internet at: http: //www.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/
practice__stds.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 requires NRCS to make available for 
public review and comment proposed revisions to conservation practice 
standards used to carry out the highly erodible land and wetland 
provisions of the law. For the next 60 days, NRCS will receive comments 
relative to the proposed changes. Following that period, a 
determination will be made by NRCS regarding disposition of those 
comments, and a final determination of change will be made.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on January 27, 2000.
Danny D. Sells,
Associate Chief, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
[FR Doc. 00-2863 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

This is a decision pursuant to section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

*Decision:*                     Denied. Applicant has failed to establish that domestic instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument for the intended purposes are not available.                 

*Reasons:*                     Section 301.5(e)(4) of the regulations requires the denial of applications that have been denied without prejudice to resubmission if they are not resubmitted within the specified time period. This is the case for the following docket.                 

*Docket Number:*                     00-020.                     *Applicant:*                     University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53706-1490.                     *Instrument:*                     Zebra Fish Tank Installation.                     *Manufacturer:*                     Aquarien-Bau Schwarz, Germany. Date of Denial Without Prejudice to Resubmission: August 2, 2000.                 

Gerald A. Zerdy, 

Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs Staff. 

[FR Doc. 00-29007 Filed 11-9-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### PATRICK v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

April 17, 1951.

*1007Marcus Mann, and Mann & Mann, Salyersville, for appellant.

A. E. Funk, Atty. Gen., Guy L. Dickinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

VAN SANT, Commissioner.

Since appellant’s conviction of having whiskey in his possession for the purpose of sale in Local Option Territory is supported only by evidence obtained upon a search of his automobile pursuant to a warrant of arrest, the judgment must be reversed if appellant is correct in his contention that the warrant of arrest was invalid.

 In Harvey v. Commonwealth, 226 Ky. 36, 10 S.W.2d 471 we held that the provisions of Section 10 of our Constitution apply to the issuing of warrants of .arrest the same as it does to the issuing of search warrants for the purpose of •discovering evidence, and, unless the requisite preliminary information is furnished to the officer or court issuing the warrant, such officer or court has no authority to issue the warrant, and, if he does so without sufficient information, the warrant is invalid. In such state of case a search made pursuant to the arrest likewise is invalid and the evidence should be suppressed on proper motion, which was made in this case.

Neither the warrant nor the affidavit upon which its issuance was based was produced at the trial. Upon ascertainment that they were lost, the Commonwealth and appellant entered into a written stipulation which was incorporated in the record. The stipulation recites: “That a lady came to the office of the County Judge of Magoffin County, H. J. Ramey, and informed him that she wanted a warrant for a man for selling her husband some liquor, but that she did not know his name, but that he was in a red car with a dented fender and was a bootlegger; that the contract or agreement for the sale of the whiskey was made here in the town of Salyersville, and that they drove to the rock quarry, just out of the city limits and a man by the name of Green Williams got out of the car and brought the liquor to him and the liquor was paid for there in the road. That thé County Judge, knowing of only one car that answered that description, issued a warrant of arrest for the defendant, Bub Patrick, for selling intoxicating liquors to affiant’s husband, in violation of the Local Option Law [KRS 242.010 et seq.], and delivered the same to the Sheriff of Ma-goffin County.”

It is obvious that nothing contained in the affidavit of the unknown “lady” could lead any person to conclude, by process of reasoning, that Bub Patrick had sold the “liquor” to the “lady’s” husband. The motion to suppress the evidence should have been sustained.

The judgment is reversed for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeneLink, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John R. DePhillipo,
as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods shown in such report.

Date: March 13, 2003                    By:        /s/ John R. DePhillipo
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            John R. DePhillipo, Chief Executive
                                            Officer and Chief Financial Officer


                                      -15-
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 35 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 35

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 7 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                                Received

            October 8 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing Belleville, New Jersey, as the birthplace of the industrial 
                    revolution in the United States.

Whereas, in 1753, Josiah Hornblower, an English engineer who was an associate 
        and rival of James Watt, assembled the 1st functioning steam engine in 
        the Western Hemisphere in Belleville, New Jersey, to pump water from the 
        Schuyler copper mines;
Whereas, approximately 40 years after such assembly, the 1st steam engine made 
        in the United States was manufactured in a foundry in Belleville from 
        designs by Josiah Hornblower;
Whereas the designs were commissioned by Nicholas Roosevelt, who was the great-
        uncle of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Theodore Roosevelt, to power the 
        Polacca, which was the 1st experimental steamboat in the United States;
Whereas the Polacca negotiated the Passaic River on October 21, 1798, which was 
        several years before Robert Fulton's boat, Clermont, sailed the Hudson 
        River;
Whereas historians herald the invention of the steam engine as the beginning of 
        the industrial revolution;
Whereas the presence of Josiah Hornblower in Belleville brought many of the 
        initiators of the industrial revolution in the United States to 
        Belleville;
Whereas such individuals included members of the Rutgers family, many of whom 
        are buried in the cemetery of the old Dutch Reformed Church in 
        Belleville; and
Whereas Belleville has a rightful claim to the title ``Birthplace of the 
        American Industrial Revolution'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That--
            (1) the Congress recognizes Belleville, New Jersey, as the 
        birthplace of the industrial revolution in the United States; 
        and
            (2) the President is authorized and requested to issue a 
        proclamation honoring Belleville as such birthplace.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```