alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OCTOBER TERM, 1754.

Lib. E. J. No. 5. fol. 642.

#### Pasco Joce’s Lessee *against*Thomas Harris.

EJECTMENT for a tract of land called *Philips*Choice, in *Kent*County, containing four hundred acres.

At the trial of this cause, the plaintiff, in order to make out his title, produced and gave in evidence a patent dated the 1st of April, 1686, to *Philip*Holleadger, for a tract of land called *Philip’s*Choice, lying in *Cecil*County, on the south side of *Sassafras*River, ■ Jkc. containing 400 acres, more or less, as by certificate dated 10th of November, 1683. The plaintiff then produced and offered to give in evidence a deed duly executed, acknowledged, and recorded, from *Philip*Holleadger, the patentee, to a certain *Thomas face,*dated the 1st of *July,*1689, for “ all that “ parcel or tract of land called Varino, containing 400 “ acres, lying and being in *Cecil*County, on the south side “ of *Sassafras*River, being1 taken up by the said *Philip*“ *Holleadger*as by patent for the said land bearing date “ the Is# *of*August, 1686, may more at, large appear; as “ also one other parcel or tract of land called *Bridge*“ Point, lying and being in *Cecil*County, on the south ££ side of *Sassafras*River, containing 20 acres, being taken “ up by *Nicholas Hodgson*as by patent for the said land, “bearing date the 1st of *May,*1685, may more at large “ appear; and since which time conveyed by the said Ni- “ *cholas Hodgson*to *Philip*Holleadger, as by deed bearing “ date the 6th of *March*last past,” &c. And the plaintiff also proved, that a certain *Thomas Joce,*of whom the lessor of the plaintiff bought, was grandson and heir at law to *Thomas face,*the vendee of Holleadger, and also proved the lessor of the plaintiff’s purchase of the tract of land called *197an the declaration filed in this cause, *Philip's*Choice, by that name, from *Thomas*Joice, the grandson.

*Ringgold*and Tilghman, for plaintiff.

Bordley, *JDulany,*and *Goldsborough,*for defendant.

The defendant’s counsel objected to the deed from *Philip Holleadger*to the first named *Thomas*Joce, as being no deed for the conveyance of the tract of land in the •plaintiff’s declaration called *Philip's*Choice, to the said *Thomas Joce,*But the Court were of opinion, that the said deed was a conveyance of the tract of land called *Philip's*Choice, from *Philip Holleadger*to *Thomas*Joce, from the description therein, and it not appearing that any land of that number of acres, at that or any other time, was patented to the said *Philip Holleadger;*and for that it was •alleged by the plaintiff’s counsel, and not denied by the counsel for the defendant, that the plaintiff, and those finder whom he claimed, had been in possession of the lands mentioned in the same deed, for upwards of thirty years; and that no other possession appeared to the Court, nor any other deed than above mentioned, and that the same ought to be given in evidence to the Jury. The defendant excepted to this opinion, and appealed to the Court iff Appeals.

At *May*Term, 1756, the Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the Provincial Court.
BTXN 099 (rev. 12/14)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Highland Capital Management, L.P.

Debtor(s)

 Case No.: 19−34054−sgj11

 Chapter No.: 11

The Charitable DAF Fund, L.P.; CLO Holdco, Ltd

Appellant(s) Adversary No.: 21−03067−sgj

 vs.

Highland Capital Management, L.P.; Highland HCF

Advisor, Ltd Civil Action No.: 3:22−cv−00695−S

Appellee(s)

TRANSMITTAL AND CERTIFICATION OF RECORD ON APPEAL

 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 8010, the appeal filed on 3/21/2022 regarding [100] Order

granting motion to dismiss adversary proceeding with prejudice (related document # 26) Entered on 3/11/2022 by

The Charitable DAF Fund, L.P.; CLO Holdco, Ltd in the above styled bankruptcy case is hereby transmitted to the

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

 This record on appeal contains all items listed on the attached index, and is in compliance with Rule 8010 of the

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

 All further pleadings or inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to the U.S. District Clerk's Office until

such time as the appeal is fully processed in the U.S. District Court.

 The above referenced record was delivered to the U.S. District Clerk's Office on April 26, 2022.

DATED: 4/26/22 FOR THE COURT:

Robert P. Colwell, Clerk of Court

by: /s/J. Blanco, Deputy Clerk

Case 3:22-cv-00695-S Document 6 Filed 04/26/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 151
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of LaSalle Hotel Properties
(LHO) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jon E. Bortz, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of LHO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report, containing the financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of LHO.

February 22, 2007



/s/    JON E. BORTZJon E. BortzChairman of the Board, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 00-131]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a NASA Advisory Council, Aero-Space Technology Advisory Committee, Aviation Safety Reporting System Subcommittee meeting. 

# DATES:

Monday, November 13, 2000, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.; and Tuesday, November 14, 2000, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

Doubletree Hotel, Two Portola Plaza, Monterey, CA 93940. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Linda Connell, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, 650/960-6059. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. Agenda topics for the meeting are as follows:

—Report on Aviation Safety Reporting System 

—Report on Aviation Performance Measuring System Program

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will be requested to sign a visitors register. 

Dated: October 26, 2000.

Beth M. McCormick,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-28001 Filed 10-31-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
 
 The
undersigned, Mario A. Rivas, President and Chief Executive Officer of ANADIGICS,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report of the Company
on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 3, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 
 Dated:
November 5, 2009
   By:
              /s/
      Mario A. RivasMario
      A. RivasPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
 
 This
certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by
reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
by reference.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained by
ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 207

Providing for placement of a statue honoring African American recipients

of the Congressional Medal of Honor in the Capitol.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1994

Mr. CONYERS introduced the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for placement of a statue honoring African American recipients of the Congressional Medal of Honor in

the Capitol.

Whereas 79 African Americans have been awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for service in the Civil War,

the Spanish American War, World War I, the Korean

conflict, and the Vietnam conflict;

Whereas the Congressional Medal of Honor is the Nation’s

highest award for bravery in military service;

Whereas African American recipients of the Congressional

Medal of Honor have gone virtually unrecognized

throughout history, while serving in the highest tradition

of the United States military;
2

•HCON 207 IH

Whereas a statue has been constructed, with private funds,

to celebrate the accomplishments of these great American

heroes, and to recognize the great sacrifice and outstanding performance of the African Americans who boldly

served this country, and were justly awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor;

Whereas this memorial will afford Americans of all descents

an opportunity to understand the tremendous contributions these African American heroes made to their Nation and people; and

Whereas the Capitol is a suitable and appropriate location for

this memorial to be displayed because thousands of people visit the Capitol each year: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring ),

3 SECTION 1. ACCEPTANCE AND PLACEMENT OF STATUE.

4 The Architect of the Capitol shall accept the statue

5 described in section 3, and shall place the statue in the

6 Capitol, in an appropriate area that is open to the public.

7 SEC. 2. SCHEDULE FOR PLACEMENT OF STATUE.

8 The statue shall be placed in the Capitol not later

9 than 6 months after the artist creating the statue notifies

10 the Architect of the Capitol, in writing, that the statue

11 is complete.

12 SEC. 3. DESCRIPTION OF STATUE.

13 The statue referred to in sections 1 and 2 is the stat14 ue that honors African American recipients of the Con15 gressional Medal of Honor, and is referred to in a letter
3

•HCON 207 IH

1 of the Architect of the Capitol dated March 18, 1993, dis2 cussing the placement of monuments in the Capitol and

3 responding to a letter of March 1, 1993.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00178

- CR

Francisco S. MORALES

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR6358

Honorable Mary D. Rom á n, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED March 11, 2015.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History: Annual                                        
|View History: Annual                                        
|View History:                                               
|                                                            
|U.S. Natural Gas Consumed at Refineries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            
|                                                            
|U.S. Natural Gas Consumed at Refineries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | --------- | --------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |           |           |         | 487,830 | 581,743 | 604,873 | 605,729 | 612,948
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 673,283 | 698,875 | 706,348   | 735,939   | 717,937 | NA      | 774,324 | NA      | 873,750 | 799,523
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 826,017 | 760,339 | 752,039   | 703,684   | 674,985 | 682,919 | 697,593 | 667,986 | 710,500 | 713,532
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 756,062 | 791,753 | 843,228   | 897,049   | 893,203 | 852,067 | 881,611 | 888,922 | 908,775 | 939,929
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 972,271 | 990,526 | 1,043,629 | 1,021,246 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/14/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: June 2025
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3620 

To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, to allow local hiring for 

transportation projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 22, 2013 

Ms. BASS (for herself, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. WAXMAN, Ms. HAHN, 

and Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, to allow 

local hiring for transportation projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Local Hire Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. HIGHWAY PROJECTS. 

6 Section 112 of title 23, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(h) LOCAL HIRING.— 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

10 provision of law, a State may establish local hiring 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3620 IH

1 bid specifications or consider the hiring of local 

2 workers in the evaluation of bids and proposals for 

3 a project under this title. 

4 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this sub5 section, the term ‘local’ means the geographic 

6 boundaries of a local area, as defined by the con7 tracting agency, in which the project is located.’’. 

8 SEC. 3. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS. 

9 Section 5325 of title 49, United States Code, is 

10 amended by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(k) LOCAL HIRING.— 

12 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

13 provision of law, a recipient of assistance under this 

14 chapter may establish local hiring bid specifications 

15 or consider local hiring in the evaluation of bids and 

16 proposals for a project under this chapter. 

17 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this sub18 section, the term ‘local’ means the geographic 

19 boundaries of a local area, as defined by the con20 tracting agency, in which the project is located.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 107

Expressing the sense of Congress that United States truck safety standards

not be compromised incident to the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 27, 1993

Mr. BROWN of Ohio (for himself, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mrs. BENTLEY, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. VALENTINE, Mr. ANDREWS of Maine, Mr. POMEROY, Mr.

HINCHEY, Mrs. THURMAN, and Mr. TUCKER) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Public

Works and Transportation

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that United States truck

safety standards not be compromised incident to the

implementation of the North American Free Trade

Agreement.

Whereas the North American Free Trade Agreement requires

the United States, Mexico, and Canada to ‘‘harmonize’’

their trucking safety standards, but fails to guard against

lowering vital United States safety standards;

Whereas the North American Free Trade Agreement will permit Mexican trucking companies and Mexican drivers to

operate in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California
2

•HCON 107 IH

after 3 years and throughout the United States after 6

years;

Whereas the United States truck driver fatigue rules limit

drivers to 10 hours per day behind the wheel, Canada allows 13 hours without rest, and Mexico has no limitations on truck driver time;

Whereas front brakes are required on United States trucks

but are not required on Mexican trucks, and the lack of

front brakes reduces stopping ability and increases its

susceptibility to jackknifing;

Whereas the United States maximum gross vehicle weight

limit is 80,000 pounds without a special permit, compared to 137,000 pounds in Canada and 171,000 pounds

in Mexico;

Whereas Mexico does not have a truck driver records system

and the Canadian system does not link with the United

States system, thereby making it impossible for enforcement officials in the United States to identify suspended

or revoked drivers, or drivers with disqualifying offenses

such as drunk, drugged, or reckless driving; and

Whereas only the United States requires industry-wide random testing for drugs and alcohol: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the intent of Congress that the Sec3 retary of Transportation, in the carrying out of harmoni4 zation negotiations under the auspices of the land trans5 portation standards subcommittee established under arti6 cle 913 (Annex 1) of the North American Free Trade

7 Agreement, shall not weaken in any way United States
3

•HCON 107 IH

1 truck safety standards by increasing truck sizes and

2 weights or by compromising truck safety standards such

3 as truck driver hours of service, front brake and other

4 safety equipment requirements, and the truck driver

5 record system.

Æ
<PAGE>



Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Technology Visions
Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned James B. Lahey, Chief Executive Officer of Technology Visions Group,
Inc., and James A. Giansiracusa, Chief Financial Officer of Technology Visions
Group, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May __, 2005

                                      /s/ James B. Lahey
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      James B. Lahey
                                      Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ James A. Giansiracusa
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      James A. Giansiracusa,
                                      Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
1350








In
connection with the Annual Report of Surge Global Energy, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit
(the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18
U.S.C. 1350):





(1)                  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)                  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      April 15, 2010
            
            /s/
      E. JAMIE
      SCHLOSSE.
      Jamie SchlossChief
      Executive Officer and
              Chief
      Financial Officer