alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3588 

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to exempt fire hydrants from the 

prohibition on the use of lead pipes, fittings, fixtures, solder, and flux. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2013 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio (for himself and Mr. TONKO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to exempt fire hydrants from the prohibition on the use of lead pipes, 

fittings, fixtures, solder, and flux. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Fire Safe5 ty Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTING FIRE HYDRANTS FROM PROHIBITION 

7 ON USE OF LEAD. 

8 Section 1417(a)(4)(B) of the Safe Drinking Water 

9 Act is amended by inserting ‘‘fire hydrants,’’ after ‘‘show10 er valves,’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3588 IH

1 SEC. 3. EVALUATION OF SOURCES OF LEAD IN WATER DIS2 TRIBUTION SYSTEMS AND ALTERNATE ROUT3 ING SYSTEMS. 

4 The Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

5 Agency shall— 

6 (1) consult with and seek the advice of the Na7 tional Drinking Water Advisory Council on potential 

8 changes to the regulations pertaining to lead under 

9 the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et 

10 seq.); and 

11 (2) request the Council to consider sources of 

12 lead throughout drinking water distribution systems, 

13 including through components used to reroute drink14 ing water during distribution system repairs. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### GATELEY v. HUMPHREY et ux.

No. 14464.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

Jan. 16, 1953.

O’Connor & Douglass, of Dallas, for appellant.

Larry DeBogory, of Dallas, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

See 247 S.W.2d 919 for majority opinion in above cause and dissent thereto. After overruling of motions for rehearing herein (first and second) we deemed it advisable to certify a question to our Supreme Court concerning construction of Article 2226, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. The Supreme Court on December 3, 1952, see 254 S.W.2d 98, having made answer to the question at issue in the negative, it follows that appellant Gateley should have and recover the further sum of $250 as attorney’s fees. The judgment of the trial court is therefore so reformed and enlarged as to include aforesaid item of attorney’s fees; of a total recovery and rendition of $600 against defendants Humphrey and wife, together with all costs incurred both in Appellate and trial courts.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berthel Growth & Income Trust I (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ronald O. Brendengen, Chief Financial Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company
Planning, Inc., the Trust Advisor of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


November 12, 2003                           /s/  Ronald O. Brendengen
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Ronald O. Brendengen
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 Berthel Fisher & Company
                                                 Planning, Inc.
                                                 Trust Advisor
                                                 Berthel Growth & Income Trust I
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-40761 Summary Calendar

ASEMENDES WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS
KEITH J. PRICE, Warden, Coffield Unit; KEVIN MOORE, Assistant Warden, Coffield Unit; STACY D. LAYTON, Sgt, Coffield Unit; CARY GOLDEN, Sgt, Coffield Unit; BOBBY A. PARTON, Lt, Coffield Unit; BRIAN T. PARKER, Correctional Officer, Coffield Unit; JAMES W. SUBER, Correctional Officer, Coffield Unit; TYDE R. WEIL, Correctional Officer, Coffield Unit, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CV-954 July 30, 1997
Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * AFFIRMED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 47.6.
#### Ex parte DAVIS.

No. 26201.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 10, 1952.

Reginald Bracewell, Huntsville, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The relator, an inmate of the state penitentiary, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus claiming that he is illegally confined in said penitentiary because of the following facts:

On October 2, 1950, the relator was convicted in the District Court of Hutchinson County as a second offender under 'he driving while intoxicated clause and sentenced to two years in the penitentiary. Thereafter, on February 21, 1952, he was again convicted in the same court for driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated and fined the sum of $400'; which was promptly paid.

Under the first conviction of October 2, 1950', the judge of said court allowed the relator to remain unsentenced until the 7th day of November, 1952, when he was-brought into court, and the suspension or probation of sentence was revoked and he was sentenced by the trial court to' serve-two years in the state penitentiary under the conviction first above mentioned.

It is shown from the record that the revocation of his probation or suspension of sentence took place 35 days after his two-year term would have expired.

It is therefore the contention of the relator that at the time the court revoked his. clemency that ihe had granted, the relator’s, time for serving in the penitentiary had. expired 35 days prior thereto.

Upon the presentation of this cause to this court, the matter was referred to the District Judge of Hutchinson County, and by him it is shown that the revocation of' the relator’s clemency took place more than two years after the primary conviction, and verdict of two years in the state penitentiary.

We are of the opinion that the trial-court was in error in revoking this suspension of sentence after the primary confinement for two years had expired. See Ex parte Coots, 85 Tex.Cr.R. 334, 212 S.W. 173.

If we are operating under Article 779, subd. 1, Vernon’s Ann.C.GP., relating to-the suspension of sentence, it seems that the revocation came too late.

The writer is of the opinion that the-case of Broyles v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R.556, 159 S.W.2d 881, would govern herein, and also that this proceeding is not one relating to the suspension of sentence under the verdict of the jury, but is a proceeding under the probation of sentence by the trial judge. But, in either event, it-seems that this suspension or revocation,. *665•whichever it might be, is governed by the lapse of time, and that the relator had his clemency revoked by the proper authority, but that the revocation came after the term of years for which he was convicted -had expired.

Therefore, we think that the relator is entitled to his discharge at the present time, and it is so ordered in so far as this sentence of date, November 7, 1952, is involved.
2013-02-11 

Questions for IP-CEMS stakeholder experts. 

1) Describe how you do, or would do a light attenuation test for IP-CEMS. 

The light intensity is reduced from maximum to 10% of maximum at 3-4 points using for 

example 100, 75%, 50% and 10% of the energy, while the system is measuring on a known 

concentration. (Obtain 10 readings for each level.)

It must be explained how the CEMs report signal strength and how it relates to the input light 

energy. (If the relation is logarithmic, a 10 dB reduction will correspond to the 10% level.) 

It should be explained how the attenuation is achieved. Different systems, FTIR or laser 

based are sensitive to objects that are inserted in to the path. For TDL systems there are 

attenuators that are connected to the fiber optic cable that are made for this purpose. 

2) Describe how you compensate for stack gas density 

Temperature and pressure inputs are needed. An IP CEMS will measure weight / volume. In 

order to make volumetric, resulting concentration has to be STP/NTP normalized. 

3) Discuss your use of calibration cells permanently mounted in the optical 

path as opposed to ones that can be placed optically or manually into the 

optical measurement path. 

We use only cells that are permanent in the optical path. (we have never considered moving 

a temperature controlled cell in and out. too complicated) 

4) Discuss your opinion on sealed versus flow through calibration cells

For HCL applications we use only flow through cells. 

5) Discuss your approach to instrument drift measurements 

can you block the measurement path (cross stack) and evaluate instrument 

only drift. can you measure instrument drift that includes the optical 

measurement path.

IP CEMs technologies that we make (UV-DOAS, FTIR, TDL) use similar configuration or 

calibrations. The cross stack path is blocked, a temperature controlled cell is flowed with a 

gas standard with a known concentration in PPM x M. The system response is recorded. 

6) Provide general feed back on a requirement for all HCl CEMS to perform 

RATA comparisons to a reference method. 

It will be difficult to meet RA requirements when HCL concentrations are very low.
<PAGE>   1
[ERICSSON LETTERHEAD]

                                                                 Exhibit 10.18.1


January 4, 2000


Kenneth Copic
Vice President/General Manager
Duraswitch
234 S. Extension, Sec 103
Mesa, AZ 85210

RE: Cancellation of Purchase Order #Q02052

This letter is to confirm the cancellation of purchase order #Q02052 for
Ericsson P/N RMF356202/1 - Mode/Volume Switch. This purchase order is cancelled
in its entirety.

Please contact me, questions or concerns

Sincerely,


/s/ Michael Bielan

Michael Bielan
Procurement Manager - Mechanical
Ericsson/RTP
Ph. 919 472-7666
Fax 919 472-7470



/s/ Don Tegnelia, Sr.

Don Tegnelia, Sr.
Director of Procurement
Ericsson/RTP
Ph. 919 472-7188


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ERICSSON INC.                                                         [GRAPHICS]
7001 Development Drive, P.O. Box 13969
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
(919) 472-7000
                                                      Certificate Number FM11374
                                                                         -------
Case 7:22-cr-00008-O Document 82 Filed 03/10/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 67
Case 7:22-cr-00008-O Document 82 Filed 03/10/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 68
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           19084
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           81767
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                371000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     952908
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         973128
<ALLOWANCE>                                      35328
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3525594
<DEPOSITS>                                     1704176
<SHORT-TERM>                                    408603
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             283798
<LONG-TERM>                                     451793
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       1010
<COMMON>                                           285
<OTHER-SE>                                      575929
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 3525594
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  89380
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                80386
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 15934
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                185700
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               79098
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              128529
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            57171
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    28007
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               29781
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 264687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  54827
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       33263
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     33263
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.08
<LOANS-NON>                                      51158
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 33437
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    23761
<RECOVERIES>                                      4335
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                35328
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             35328
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66762-66763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28575]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Announcement of Subsistence Resource Commission Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Announcement of Subsistence Resource Commission meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Superintendent of Gates of the Arctic National Park and 
Preserve and the Chairperson of the Subsistence Resource Commission for 
Gates of the Arctic National Park announce a forthcoming meeting of the 
Gates of the Arctic National Park Subsistence Resource Commission. The 
following agenda items will be discussed:
(1) Call to order.
(2) Roll call. Confirm quorum.
(3) Approval of summary of meeting minutes for November 15-17,1999 
meeting in Fairbanks.
(4) Review agenda.
(5) Superintendent's Welcome.
(6) Introductions of Guests and Agency Staff.
(7) Review Commission Role and Purpose.
(8) Superintendent's Management and Research Update.
(9) Public and agency comments.
    a. Correspondence.
(10) Old Business.
    a. October 2000 SRC Chair's Meeting Report.
    b. Review Public Comments on the Gates of the Arctic National Park 
and Preserve Draft Subsistence Management Plan.
    c. Hunting Plan Recommendation 99-01 (Customary Trade)--Review 
public, Regional Council and Local Advisory Committee comments.
(11) New Business.
    a. Review Federal Subsistence Board and Regional Advisory Council 
actions.
    b. Federal Subsistence Fisheries Management Update.
    c. Western Arctic Caribou Working Group Update.
    d. SRC Work Session (Draft letters/Outreach).
(12) SRC Elections for Chair and Vice Chair.
(13) Set time and place of next SRC meeting.
(14) Adjournment.

DATES: The meeting will be held from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Tuesday, 
November 14 and 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Wednesday, November 15, 2000.

[[Page 66763]]


LOCATION: The meeting will be held at Sophie Station Hotel, 1717 
University Ave., Fairbanks, Alaska.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Mills, Superintendent and Jeff 
Mow, Subsistence Manager, 201 First Avenue, Doyon Bldg., Fairbanks, 
Alaska 99701. Phone (907) 456-0578.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Subsistence Resource Commissions are 
authorized under Title VIII, section 808, of the Alaska National 
Interest Lands Conservation Act, Public Law 96-487 and operate in 
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committees Act.

John Quinley,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 00-28575 Filed 11-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
** **

**Exhibit 8**

 

List of Principal Subsidiaries

of

Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V.

 
| **Subsidiary**                                        | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|-------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------|
| ** **                                            | ** ** | ** **                        |
| Gruma Corporation                                     |       | Nevada, United States             |
|                                                  |       |                              |
| Azteca Milling LP                                     |       | Texas, United States              |
|                                                  |       |                              |
| Compañía Nacional Almacenadora S.A. de C.V. |       | Mexico                            |

 

----
Exhibit 10(al)


 


Sixth Amendment to the


Aon Corporation Excess
Benefit Plan


 


WHEREAS, the Aon Corporation Excess Benefit Plan (the
“EBP”), as amended, is generally effective as of January 1, 1989.


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Aon Corporation
desires to further amend the EBP pursuant to the Board’s authority to do so
under Article VII of the EBP.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the EBP is amended as follows,
effective as of January 1, 2006:


 


Section 4.1             As it relates to any Member with at
least one hour of service with the Company on or after January 1, 2006,
subsection (a) of Section 4.1 shall be deleted and the following substituted in
its place to read as follows:


 


“(a)         The
greatest of:


 


(i)            the
amount of the annual benefit which the Member would have been entitled to
receive under the Pension Plan had the Pension Plan not applied the Maximum
Annual Benefit Limitation in determining benefits payable from the Pension
Plan.  For purposes of this Section
4.1(a)(i), the Annual Earnings used for determining benefits payable from the
Pension Plan: (A) shall not be limited by the Compensation Limit; and (B) shall
not exceed $500,000 for plan years after 2001;


 


(ii)           the
amount determined under Section 4.1(a)(i) as of December 31, 2005; or


 


(iii)          the
amount of an annual benefit equal to one percent of the Member’s Final Average
Earnings multiplied by the Member’s Years of Service, up to a maximum annual
benefit of $500,000 per year payable in the form of a single life annuity
..  For purposes of this Section
4.1(a)(iii), the amount of the Member’s Final Average Earnings used for
determining benefits payable shall not be limited by the Compensation Limit.”


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Aon Corporation hereby adopts this Sixth Amendment to the Aon Corporation
Excess Benefit Plan, effective as set forth above


 


 


	
   

  	
  AON CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ John A. Reschke

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  John A. Reschke

  
	
   

  	
  Vice President, Employee and Benefits

  



 


2
Case 2:22-mj-00050-BR Document 1 Filed 03/28/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 1
Case 2:22-mj-00050-BR Document 1 Filed 03/28/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 2
Case 2:22-mj-00050-BR Document 1 Filed 03/28/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             525,789   
<SECURITIES>                                             0   
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0   
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0   
<INVENTORY>                                              0   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   532,853   
<PP&E>                                           2,504,698   
<DEPRECIATION>                                      33,777   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,122,500   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,907,113   
<BONDS>                                                  0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0   
<PREFERRED>                                              0   
<COMMON>                                         1,793,436   
<OTHER-SE>                                               0   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,122,500   
<SALES>                                                  0   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   222,043   
<CGS>                                                    0   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      282,496   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 140,178   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0   
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0   
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0   
<CHANGES>                                                0   
<NET-INCOME>                                       222,043   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.18)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0   
                                                             
                                              

</TABLE>