alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1




Certification
by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of HepaLife Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
on the Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank
Menzler, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





(i)       
  the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(ii)         The
information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates
and for the periods presented therein.





HEPALIFE
      TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date:March 30,
      2009
                By:
                /s/ Frank MenzlerFrank
      Menzler
                  President
      and Chief Executive
Officer





This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### GOODMAN v. STATE.

No. 25008.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 15, 1950.

W. E. Martin, Abilene, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury on & charge of possessing beer for sale in a dry area. His punishment was assessed at a $100.00 fine and thirty days in jail.

Only one witness testified in behalf of the State. Armed with a search warrant he went to the premises where appellant and four others were found drinking beer in the kitchen. He asked who was in possession of the premises and appellant replied that he was. The officer then served him with the search warrant and obtained,, as the fruits of the search, twenty-five bottles of beer, a sufficient quantity to support a presumption of guilt under the charge. The witness said that he had seen the defendant at the same place on a prior occasion.

Appellant did not testify or maké any denial of the foregoing evidence. Some witnesses, including his father, testified as character witnesses. Another party testified in his behalf that the house belonged to a sister of such witness, but that a brother was occupying it at the time of the search. That brother had joined the armed services and did not appear as a witness. No other pertinent testimony is; found in the record.

The court gave a general charge,, together with some special charges. Appellant requested two special charges. One-of these was a charge on circumstantial1 evidence. We do not view this as a circumstantial evidence case.

The second requested special charge which was refused by the court instructed the jury that if they believed the beer in question was in the possession of Joe Mc-Loughlin, or they had a reasonable doubt thereof, they would acquit the defendant even though they should find further that appellant was temporarily in charge of the-house where the beer was found.

*849The record before us does not contain any evidence to warrant such charge and it was properly refused by the court.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7190

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICHARD RONTE JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (CR-02-700400; CA-04-646-7)

Submitted: March 30, 2006 Decided: April 6, 2006

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Ronte Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Richard Ronte Jackson seeks to appeal the district

court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000) and denying his motion to reconsider filed pursuant to Fed.

R. Civ. P. 59(e). The orders are not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Jackson has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00318-CR

IN RE Isaias PAZ-ESTRADA, et al.

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 21, 2024

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART

On April 4, 2023, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On June 6, 2023, we 

received notice that relator Alberto Garcia Galvan’s request for relief is now moot. Accordingly, 

we dismiss relator Galvan’s request for relief as moot.

As for the remaining seventeen relators, after considering the petition, real party in 

interest’s response, relators’ reply, amicus briefing, and this record, this court concludes relators 

1 This proceeding arises out of eighteen civil bond forfeiture cases involving the State of Texas and the following 

defendants and their trial cause numbers: Isaias Paz-Estrada, Cause No. 1096; Jorge Luis de la Cruz-Cordova, Cause 

No. 1110; Marcelo Hernandez-Pablo, Cause No. 1111; Diego Villarreal Castellanos, Cause No. 1112; Jose Domingo 

Palacio Lazarin, Cause No. 1113; Oribel Martinez Leon, Cause No. 1220; Roque Alvarez Arias, Cause No. 1242;

Pedro Marcos Ruiz Aguilar, Cause No. 1246; Romario Lopez Jimenez, Cause No. 1249; Alberto Garcia Galvan, 

Cause No. 1254; Walter Gonzalez Rueda, Cause No. 1256; Jorge Luis Olalde-Gustavo; Cause No. 1275; Luis Adrian 

Medina-Gonzalez, Cause No. 1277; Joel Santiago Zamora, Cause No. 1278; Juan Ignasio Gonzalez Abundis, Cause 

No. 1279; Carlos Oviedo Oviedo, Cause No. 1280; Oscar Gerado Posadas-Garcias, Cause No. 1283; and Abenmar 

Cordova Cacho, Cause No. 1311 all pending in the County Court, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable David E. 

Garcia presiding.
04-23-00318-CR

- 2 -

are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
Exhibit 13.2


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of TELEFONICA HOLDING DE ARGENTINA
S.A. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004,
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Juan Ignacio Lopez Basavilbaso, Director, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                By: /s/ Juan Ignacio Lopez Basavilbaso
                                   -------------------------------------------
                                Name:   Juan Ignacio Lopez Basavilbaso
                                Title:  Director
Date: July 14, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2868]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[00-016]


Proposed Information Collection Activity; Comment Request

AGENCY:  National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION:  Notice of agency report forms under OMB review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of 
its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information 
collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). Information collection is 
required to ensure proper use of and disposition of rights to 
inventions made in the course of, and data developed under NASA 
contracts.

DATES:  All comments should be submitted on or before April 10, 2000.

ADDRESSES:  All comments should be addressed to Mr. Paul A. Boellner, 
Code Q, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 
20546-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Ms. Carmela Simonson, NASA Reports 
Officer, (202) 358-1223.
    Title: NASA Safety Reporting System.
    OMB Number: 2700-0063.
    Type of review: Extension.
    Need and Uses: NASA employees and contractors can voluntarily and 
confidentially report to an independent agent, any safety concerns or 
hazards pertaining to any NASA program or project, which have not been 
resolved through the normal process.
    Affected Public: Federal Government.
    Number of Respondents: 75.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 75.
    Hours Per Request: \1/4\ hr.
    Annual Burden Hours: 19 hrs.
    Frequency of Report: As needed.

David B. Nelson,
Deputy Chief Information Officer, Office of the Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-2868 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 209 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 209

Expressing the sense of the Congress that any comprehensive health care 
reform legislation that is enacted should provide for annual screenings 
          of children under 6 years of age for lead poisoning.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 1994

Mrs. Kennelly (for herself, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Dellums, Mr. Foglietta, 
   Mr. McDermott, Mr. Owens, Ms. Pelosi, Ms. Waters, Mr. Frost, Mr. 
   Gejdenson, Mr. Scott, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Bonior, Ms. Eddie 
Bernice Johnson of Texas, Ms. Furse, Ms. Velazquez, and Mr. Washington) 
   submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 
  jointly to the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that any comprehensive health care 
reform legislation that is enacted should provide for annual screenings 
          of children under 6 years of age for lead poisoning.

Whereas lead poisoning is the most serious environmental health problem 
        affecting children in the United States;
Whereas more than 6,000,000 children and 400,000 pregnant women have levels of 
        lead in their blood that exceed the level that is considered safe by the 
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and
Whereas studies have proven that lead poisoning in children results in learning 
        disabilities and medical complications: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that any comprehensive health care 
reform legislation that is enacted should provide for annual screenings 
of children under 6 years of age for lead poisoning.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 2

Class Action Complaint

Purification Element Box

Case 3:22-cv-00728-M Document 1-2 Filed 09/16/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID 93
Black Berkey Purification Element: Product Image

Case 3:22-cv-00728-M Document 1-2 Filed 09/16/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID 94
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-60277

Summary Calendar

DORIS VIANEY CULEBRO TRINIDAD HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A099 158 876

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Doris Vianey Culebro Trinidad Hernandez, a native and citizen of 

Mexico, has filed a petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (BIA) affirming the denial of her application for withholding of 

removal. Hernandez sought withholding of removal based on threatening 

phone calls she and her family received from individuals in Mexico demanding 

money.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 9, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-60277 Document: 00512494855 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2014
No. 13-60277

We review the order of the BIA and will consider the underlying decision 

of the immigration judge only if it had some impact upon the BIA’s decision. 

Orellana-Monson v. Holder, 685 F.3d 511, 517 (5th Cir. 2011). “To be eligible 

for withholding of removal, an applicant must demonstrate a clear probability

of persecution on the basis of race, religion, nationality, membership in a 

particular social group, or political opinion.” Chen v. Gonzales, 470 F.3d 1131, 

1138 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

Hernandez contends that the BIA erred in determining that she failed to 

demonstrate past persecution and a clear probability of future persecution. 

She also challenges the BIA’s alternative determination that she failed to 

demonstrate membership in a particular social group for purposes of 

withholding of removal. The BIA’s determination that an alien is not eligible 

for withholding of removal is reviewed under the substantial evidence 

standard. Chen, 470 F.3d at 1134. Under that standard, we will not reverse 

the BIA’s decision unless the evidence not only supports a contrary conclusion 

but compels it. Id.

Members of Hernandez’s family continue to live in Mexico, and she and 

her family have not been harmed beyond receiving threatening phone calls 

demanding money. Economic extortion does not constitute a form of 

persecution under immigration law. Castillo-Enriquez v. Holder, 690 F.3d 667, 

668 (5th Cir. 2012). The BIA’s determination that Hernandez failed to make 

the requisite showing regarding persecution is supported by substantial 

evidence.

The petition for review is DENIED.

2

 Case: 13-60277 Document: 00512494855 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/09/2014
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Dynabazaar, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K to which this certification is
attached (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange
Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A)
shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.


Date:   March 26, 2004                          /s/Melvyn Brunt
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Melvyn Brunt
                                                Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Power & Equipment Corp. &
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark J. Wright, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                         /s/ Mark J. Wright
                                         ---------------------------
                                         Name: Mark J. Wright
                                         Chief Financial Officer and Principal
                                         Accounting Officer
                                         Date: December 12, 2006


     A signed original of the written statements required by Section 906 has
been provided to Western Power & Equipment Corp. & Subsidiary and will be
retained by Western Power & Equipment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3627 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 10, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To require the Attorney General to report on State law 

penalties for certain child abusers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3627 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kilah Davenport Child 

3 Protection Act of 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ATTORNEY GENERAL REPORT. 

5 Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 

6 of this Act, and again 3 years thereafter, the Attorney 

7 General shall publish and submit to the Committee on the 

8 Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Com9 mittee on the Judiciary of the United States Senate a re10 port on the penalties for violations of laws prohibiting 

11 child abuse in each of the 50 States, the District of Colum12 bia, and each territory of the United States, including 

13 whether the laws of that State, District, or territory pro14 vides for enhanced penalties when the victim has suffered 

15 serious bodily injury, or permanent or protracted loss or 

16 impairment of any mental or emotional function. 

17 SEC. 3. EXPANSION OF PREDICATE FOR INCREASED PEN18 ALTIES FOR CERTAIN DOMESTIC ASSAULTS. 

19 Section 117(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is 

20 amended by inserting ‘‘, or against a child of or in the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3627 RFS

1 care of the person committing the domestic assault’’ after 

2 ‘‘intimate partner’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 9, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
### PROJECT:



# Edmonton International Airport

Naturally Wallace Consulting

LOCATION Edmonton, Canada

PROJECT TYPE Airport Deicing

COMPLETION DATE

2011

DESIGN FLOW Up to 4000 m 3



### /day

TREATMENT

Gravel Bed with Forced

Bed Aeration TM



### PARTNER Associated Engineering

2

0

0 NEED Glycol contaminated stormwater at Edmonton International Airport stays frozen every winter until the spring thaw. At this point, glycol and other plane and pavement deic ing compounds are washed away to a large collection pond. Water from the pond requires treatment prior to discharge in a nearby creek. The existing wetland system has been treating the flow for almost a decade, but with expansion of the airport, a major increase in overall treatment capacity was required.

SOLUTION The system expansion is designed to provide over 700 kg

- BOD 5 /d treatment capacity and will be engineered to provide increased influent

flow rates as the concentration of the BOD 5 drops during spring melt. The upgrade will include reconfiguration of up to three of the existing

treatment trains. The first wetland cel l will be modified to a vertical flow configuration and incorporate Forced Bed Aeration TM

. The second cell in the train will be reconfigured as a surface flow wetland for polishing of the

effluent. A nutrient feed system will also be included to allow ad dition of nutrient solution to match the level of organics in the influent.

BENEFIT With addition of aeration and nutrients, the existing wetland system can provide up to 10x more treatment in half the footprint. The aeration and nutrient systems are designed so that levels can be adjusted based on

influent concentrations. Converting to aerated gravel beds removes the hydraulic constraints previously experienced with the horizontal flow

wetlands. A new lift station also provides substantially more flexibil ity with meeting the aberrant flows of spring melt. Finally, incorporation of a recycle system permits expedited star t

- up in the s pring.

Aerial photo courtesy of Associated Engineering



### Naturally Wallace Consulting

4276 Greenhaven Ct.

Vadnais Heights, MN 55127

612 802 2329



### Naturallywallace.com 

# Process design experts

e experts in treatment wetlands