alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Mark R. Sokolowski, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of InPlay Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation;  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                           Date:  March 24, 2008 By:  /s/ Mark R. Sokolowski    Mark R. Sokolowski    Chief Financial Officer   
70
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350




In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tongli
Pharmaceuticals (USA), Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2010, I, Mingli Yao,
Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1. Such
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Tongli Pharmaceuticals (USA),
Inc.





Dated:
June 29, 2010




/s/
      Mingli YaoMingli
      YaoChief
      Executive Officer and
Chairman
| 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Shire plc. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                 |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Angus Russell                    |   |
|   |   | Angus RussellChief Executive Officer |   |
|   |   |                                 |   |
|   |   |                                 |   |

|   |   |                                       |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                       |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Graham Hetherington                    |   |
|   |   | Graham HetheringtonChief Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |                                       |   |
|   |   |                                       |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1 TO 10-QSB
----------------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Prologic Management Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James M. Heim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to
the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company for the periods presented.



                                           /s/ James M. Heim
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           James M. Heim
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           Prologic Management Systems, Inc.
                                           February 10, 2005
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 8, 2019

t1105 

# Order

Clerk November 8, 2019

160254

In re ALTANTAWI, Minors. SC: 160254

COA: 345779

Oakland CC Family Division:

2017

- 856888

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 27, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is con sidered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 21, 2014

Order 

October 21, 2014

149407-8(83)

LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.,

Petitioner-Appellee,

v

TOWNSHIP OF MARQUETTE,

Respondent-Appellant.

SC: 149407

COA: 314111

MTT: 00-385768

________________________________________/

HOME DEPOT USA, INC.,

Petitioner-Appellee,

v

TOWNSHIP OF BREITUNG,

Respondent-Appellant.

SC: 149408

COA: 314301

MTT: 00-366428

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of petitioners-appellees to file a response 

to the amicus curiae brief filed by the Michigan Municipal League, the Michigan 

Association of Counties, and the Michigan Association of School Boards is GRANTED. 

The response to the amicus brief submitted on October 9, 2014, is accepted for filing.
Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 8, 2000 / Notices 67037

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service

Surety Companies Acceptable on

Federal Bonds: Lexington National

Insurance Corporation

AGENCY: Financial Management Service,

Fiscal Service, Department of the

Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 5 to

the Treasury Department Circular 570:

1998 Revision, published June 30, 2000,

at 65 FR 40868.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874–6765.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A

Certificate of Authority as an acceptable

surety on Federal bonds is hereby

issued to the following Company under

31 U.S.C. 9304 to 9308. Federal bondapproving officers should annotate their

reference copies of the Treasury Circular

570, 2000 Revision, on page 40889 to

reflect this addition:

Company Name: Lexington National

Insurance Corporation.

Business Address: 214 East Lexington

Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21202.

Phone: (410) 625–0800. Underwriting

Limitation b/: $423,000.

Surety Licenses: c/: CA, CO, DE, FL,

IN, MD, MS, NJ, PA.

Incorported In: Maryland.

Certificates of Authority expire on

June 30 each year, unless revoked prior

to that date. The Certificates are subject

to subsequent annual renewal as long as

the companies remain qualified (31 CFR

Part 223). A list of qualified companies

is published annually as of July 1 in

Treasury Department Circular 570, with

details as to underwriting limitations,

areas in which licensed to transact

surety business and other information.

The Circular may be viewed and

downloaded through the Internet at

http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570/

index.html. A hard copy may be

purchased from the Government

Printing Office (GPO) Subscription

Service, Washington, DC, Telephone

(202) 512–1800. When ordering the

Circular from GPO, use the following

stock number: 048–000–00536–5.

Questions concerning this Notice may

be directed to the U.S. Department of

the Treasury, Financial Management

Service, Financial Accounting and

Service Division, Surety Bond Branch,

3700 East-West Highway, Room 6A04,

Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: October 30, 2000.

Wanda Rogers,

Director, Financial Accounting and Services

Division, Financial Management Service.

[FR Doc. 00–28589 Filed 11–7–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810–35–M
MINISTRY OF 

TRAFFIC, TRANSPORT AND URBAN PLANNING 

CURA<;AO CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY 

Date 

January 3Q<h, 2015 

Your Letter dated: 

Subject: 

Contact Person 

Gijs Winters 

Your Reference: 

Opera lion of 7'h freedom charter flights 

Dear Sirs, 

Error! Auto Text entry not defined. 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of International Aviation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

USA 

E-mail 

gwinters.ccaa@gmail.com 

Our reference 

CURCW/13/ 

Page(s) 

1/1 

The undersigned, Director General of the Cura~ao Civil Aviation Authority, hereby confirms 

that Cura~ao will consider applications by U.S. carriers for the approval to operate charter 

flights to and from Cura~ao in accordance with the provisions of the Air Transport 

Agreement between the United States of America and the Kingdom of the Netherlands in 

respect of Cura<;ao, relating to Air Transport between Cura<;ao and the United States of 

America, initialed on April25, 2014. 

Cura<;ao will in addition grant approval for designated U.S. carriers to operate 7th freedom 

charter flights on the understanding that the United States would grant similar rights to 

designated Cura<;ao carriers in accordance with the provisions of the above mentioned Air 

Transport Agreement for the period from January 22nd, 2015 to July 2151, 2015. 

Yours sincerely, 

• J 

Oscar L. Derby 7 

Director General 

Cura<;ao Civil Aviation Authority. 

Edifisio Siegfried Francisco, Seru Mahuma z/n I Willemstad, Cura~ao I T. (5999) 839-3319 I F. (5999) 868-9924 I civilair®gobiernu.cw
Reviewer: 

Affiliation: Peabody Energy Corporation

Comment:
Response: Thank you for your comments. The authors are confident in the CDEM and its measurements. 

The CDEM has been commercialized and is being manufactured and as such, the development phase is 

complete. However, the implementation of the CDEM is not. Based on the comments received from the 

mining industry reviewers of this report, we have also determined that there exists a general lack of 

understanding on the differences between the LTA method for determining the total incombustible 

content of a mine dust sample and the CDEM assessment of the explosibility of the dust sample. To that 

end, NIOSH OMSHR recognizes the need for additional training and welcomes the offer of support and 

involvement of Peabody and others in this process.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-4244

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Timothy O'Laughlin

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

____________

 Submitted: July 27, 2017

Filed: August 10, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, MURPHY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Timothy O’Laughlin, who was found incompetent to stand trial under 18

U.S.C. § 4241(d) on criminal charges involving stalking and making threats, appeals
the district court’s order civilly committing him under 18 U.S.C. § 4246, which 1

provides for the hospitalization of a person found after a hearing to be suffering from

a mental disease or defect such that his release would create a substantial risk of

bodily injury to another person or serious damage to the property of another. See

United States v. Williams, 299 F.3d 673, 676 (8th Cir. 2002). For reversal,

O’Laughlin challenges the sufficiency of the evidence justifying his commitment. 

Having reviewed for clear error the factual determinations underlying the

commitment decision, see id., we affirm. Specifically, the district court’s order is

supported by the opinions of mental health experts who have assessed O’Laughlin at

the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri--

where he is presently confined for treatment--that O’Laughlin was in need of

inpatient treatment under section 4246, in part because the symptoms of his mental

condition included delusions and paranoid beliefsthat caused him to lash out at those

he perceived to be targeting him; he lacked insight into his mental condition, the

symptoms of which are improved but not resolved with medication; he had a history

of not taking prescribed medication; and he minimized the seriousness of, and

recently continued to engage in, the behaviors that led to his criminal charges. See

Williams, 299 F.3d at 677-78; United States v. Ecker, 30 F.3d 966, 970 (8thCir.1994)

(suggested factors in determining potential dangerousness). We note that the

AttorneyGeneral must continue effortsto place O’Laughlin in a suitable state facility,

and that while confined O’Laughlin shall receive treatment which may lead to his

release or conditional release. See 18 U.S.C. § 4246(d)-(e); Ecker, 30 F.3d at 971. 

The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________

The Honorable Douglas Harpool, United States DistrictJudge for the Western 1

District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

-2-
# U n ited S tates C o u rt o f A p p ea ls Fo r th e Se ve n th C irc u it Ch i cago , I l l i noi s 6 0604 A ugust 2 2, 20 08 B efo re W IL L IA M J. B A U E R, Cir cu i tJudg e JO H N L . C O FF E Y , Cir cu i tJudg e IL A N A D IA M O N D R O V N E R, Cir cu i tJudg e 

### No. 07-2832 ANGELA TYSON, Appeal from the United Plaintiff-Appellant, States District Court for the Southern District v. of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. GANNETT INCORPORATED, doing business as INDIANAPOLIS STAR No. 05 C 1848 AND NEWS, Defendant-Appellee. Richard L. Young, Judge.

OR D ER The sl i p opi ni on i ssued i n the abov e- enti tl ed cause on Au gust 19, 20 08, i s a m ended as f ol l ows: On pa g e 1, the i den ti f i ca ti o n o fthe l o wer c o ur t des cr ibe d a s emana ti ngf r o m the S o ut he r n Di st r i cto fI l l i no i s sh o ul d b e m o di f i ed to r efl ec t th atthi s appe ali s f r o m the S o ut he r n Di st r i cto fI ndi an a, I ndi an apo l i s Di vi si o n. On p age 2, the f i rs t s entence o fthe f i rs t fullpara gr aph shoul d now r ead: Tyso n’s em p loyer, Ga nn ett, i s the ow ne r ofthe n ew sp ap er know n as th e I nd ianap oli s Star.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          18,428
<SECURITIES>                                       527
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     40,162
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,477
<PP&E>                                          10,917
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,248
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,648
<SALES>                                        120,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,140
<CGS>                                          104,692
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (79)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,241
<INCOME-TAX>                                       471
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                770
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       770
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Case 7:22-cv-00028-M-BP Document 5 Filed 04/11/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 8
Case 7:22-cv-00028-M-BP Document 5 Filed 04/11/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 9
Case 7:22-cv-00028-M-BP Document 5 Filed 04/11/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 10
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,944
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,409
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,173
<INVENTORY>                                     30,542
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,637
<PP&E>                                         109,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 223,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,003
<BONDS>                                         85,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   223,930
<SALES>                                         65,451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,854
<CGS>                                           71,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   75,968
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,052
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,875
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,467
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,408
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,408
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 01, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 01, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0203. RACHEL LOWE v. ROY WILLARD. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2020CV0469