66178 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 214 / Friday, November 3, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

§ 52.222 Negative declarations.

(a) * * *

(6) * * *

(iv) Pharmaceuticals and Cosmetic

Manufacturing Operations submitted on

March 28, 2000 and adopted on January

18, 2000.

* * * * *

(b) * * *

(4) * * *

(iii) Nitric Acid Units submitted on

March 28, 2000 and adopted on January

18, 2000.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 00–27659 Filed 11–2–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[OPP–301043; FRL–6740–9]

RIN 2070–AB78

Sodium o-nitophenolate, sodium pnitrophenolate, sodium 5-

nitroguaiacolate, and the End–Use

Product Atonik Exemption From the

Requirement of a Tolerance and

Temporary Exemption From the

Requirement of a Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an

exemption from the requirement of a

tolerance for residues of the active

ingredients (a.i.) sodium onitophenolate, sodium p-nitrophenolate,

sodium 5-nitroguaiacolate, on all food

commodities when used as Plant

Growth Regulators on growing crops.

These three a.i. comprise the end–use

product ATONIK, ASAHI

Manufacturing Company, Ltd., c/o

Chemical Consultants International,

Inc., West 98th Terrace, Suite 100,

Overland Park, KS, 66212, submitted a

petition to EPA under the Federal Food,

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as

amended by the Food Quality Protection

Act (FQPA) of 1996, requesting an

exemption from the requirement of a

tolerance. This regulation eliminates the

need to establish a maximum

permissible level for residues of sodium

o-nitophenolate, sodium pnitrophenolate, and sodium 5-

nitroguaiacolate and reassess the three

existing tolerances for those three a.i..

DATES: This regulation is effective

November 3, 2000. Objections and

requests for hearings, identified by

docket control number OPP–301043,

must be received by EPA on or before

January 2, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written objections and

hearing requests may be submitted by

mail, in person, or by courier. Please

follow the detailed instructions for each

method as provided in Unit VIII. of the

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. To ensure

proper receipt by EPA, your objections

and hearing requests must identify

docket control number OPP–301043 in

the subject line on the first page of your

response.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By

mail: Richard King, c/o Product

Manager (PM) 90, Biopesticides and

Pollution Prevention Division (7511C),

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,

DC 20460; telephone number: (703)

308–8052; e-mail address:

king.richard@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

You may be affected by this action if

you are an agricultural producer, food

manufacturer, or pesticide

manufacturer. Potentially affected

categories and entities may include, but

are not limited to:

CategoriesNAICS

codes

Examples of potentially affected entities

Industry 111 Crop production

112 Animal production

311 Food manufacturing

32532 Pesticide manufacturing

This listing is not intended to be

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide

for readers regarding entities likely to be

affected by this action. Other types of

entities not listed in the table could also

be affected. The North American

Industrial Classification System

(NAICS) codes have been provided to

assist you and others in determining

whether or not this action might apply

to certain entities. If you have questions

regarding the applicability of this action

to a particular entity, consult the person

listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Additional

Information, Including Copies of this

Document and Other Related

Documents?

1. Electronically. You may obtain

electronic copies of this document, and

certain other related documents that

might be available electronically, from

the EPA Internet Home Page at http://

www.epa.gov/. To access this

document, on the Home Page select

‘‘Laws and Regulations,’’ ‘‘Regulations

and Proposed Rules,’’ and then look up

the entry for this document under the

‘‘Federal Register—Environmental

Documents.’’ You can also go directly to

the Federal Register listings at http://

www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.

2. In person. The Agency has

established an official record for this

action under docket control number

OPP–301043. The official record

consists of the documents specifically

referenced in this action, and other

information related to this action,

including any information claimed as

Confidential Business Information (CBI).

This official record includes the

documents that are physically located in

the docket, as well as the documents

that are referenced in those documents.

The public version of the official record

does not include any information

claimed as CBI. The public version of

the official record, which includes

printed, paper versions of any electronic

comments submitted during an

applicable comment period is available

for inspection in the Public Information

and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB),

Rm. 119, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson

Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA, from 8:30

a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,

excluding legal holidays. The PIRIB

telephone number is (703) 305–5805.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

In the Federal Register of July 8, 1998

(63 FR 36901) (FRL–5791–6), EPA

issued a notice pursuant to section 408

of the FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a(e), as

amended by the FQPA (Public Law 104–

170) announcing the filing of a pesticide

tolerance petition by ASAHI

Manufacturing Company, Ltd., c/o

Chemical Consultants International,

Inc., West 98th Terrace, Suite 100,

Overland Park, KS, 66212. This notice

included a summary of the petition

prepared by the petitioner ASAHI

Manufacturing Company, Ltd. There

were no comments received in response

to the notice of filing.

New section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of the

FFDCA allows EPA to establish an

exemption from the requirement for a

tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide

chemical residue in or on a food) only

if EPA determines that the exemption is

‘‘safe.’’ Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) defines

‘‘safe ’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a

reasonable certainty that no harm will

result from aggregate exposure to the

pesticide chemical residue, including

all anticipated dietary exposures and all

other exposures for which there is

reliable information.’’ This includes

exposure through drinking water and in

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 214 / Friday, November 3, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 66179

residential settings, but does not include

occupational exposure. Section

408(b)(2)(C) requires EPA to give special

consideration to exposure of infants and

children to the pesticide chemical

residue in establishing a tolerance and

to ‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable

certainty that no harm will result to

infants and children from aggregate

exposure to the pesticide chemical

residue....’’ Additionally, section

408(b)(2)(D) requires that the Agency

consider ‘‘available information

concerning the cumulative effects of a

particular pesticide’s residues’’ and

‘‘other substances that have a common

mechanism of toxicity.’’

EPA performs a number of analyses to

determine the risks from aggregate

exposure to pesticide residues. First,

EPA determines the toxicity of

pesticides. Second, EPA examines

exposure to the pesticide through food,

drinking water, and through other

exposures that occur as a result of

pesticide use in residential settings.

III. Toxicological Profile

Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D)

of the FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the

available scientific data and other

relevant information in support of this

action and considered its validity,

completeness and reliability and the

relationship of this information to

human risk. EPA has also considered

available information concerning the

variability of the sensitivities of major

identifiable subgroups of consumers,

including infants and children.

The Biopesticide and Pollution

Prevention Division (BPPD) has

reviewed submitted data to assess the

potential hazards and exposures that

might result from the proposed use of

ATONIK in or on all food

commodities. The plant growth

regulator will be formulated into an

End–Use product containing a mixture

of 0.6% a.i. sodium 5-nitroguaiacolate

(1%), sodium o-nitophenolate (0.2%),

and sodium p-nitrophenolate (0.3%) by

weight and applied to all crops at rates

of less than 20 grams a.i. (g a.i.) per acre.

Based on the review of submitted

information, dose levels and toxicity

end–points were evaluated for the use of

exposure estimates to characterize

potential risks.

The Tier I data was submitted on the

end–use product, ATONIK, each of the

three a.i., sodium o-nitrophenolate,

sodium p-nitrophenolate, sodium 5-

nitoguaiacolate, and a manufacturing

use product (a mixture of the

components). No toxicity endpoints for

dietary, occupational or non–

occupational risk charaterizations were

indicated because:

1. The no–observed–adverse–effect

levels (N0AEL) from dietary

administration of the a.i. are 5–6 times

higher than that of the developmental

toxicity study (1,589 and 1,723

milligrams/kilograms/day (mg/kg/day)

for males and females compared with

300 mg/kg/day in pregant rats).

2. The acute toxicity of the end–use

product is classified into Toxicity

Category IV for the oral (LD50 > 5,000

mg/kg) and inhalation LC50 > 5.8 mg/L)

routes and Toxicity Category III for the

dermal route (LD50 > 2,000 mg/kg).

3. No developmental effects were

noted at dose up to 600 mg/kg/day

highest dose tested (HDT).

4. Studies on the three components of

the manufacturing use product (MUP)

showed no mutagentic activity.

5. The low concentration of the a.i. in

the end use product (0.6%).

6. There is a low application rate (<

20 g a.i. per acre).

IV. Aggregate Exposures

In examining aggregate exposure,

section 408 of the FFDCA directs EPA

to consider available information

concerning exposures from the pesticide

residue in food and all other non–

occupational exposures, including

drinking water from ground water or

surface water and exposure through

pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or

buildings (residential and other indoor

uses).

A. Dietary Exposure

No toxicity endpoints for dietary,

occupational or non–occupational risk

characterizations were indicated in

subchronic toxicity, developmental

toxicity or mutagenicity studies on

ATONIK or its three a.i.. The

application rate is so low (< 20 g/acre)

that negligible or nonexistent residues

would be available for risk

characterization. Therefore, considering

the lack of toxicity and low exposure no

risk characterizations have been

conducted for ATONIK.

1. Food. The end–use product,

ATONIK, contains three a.i. (sodium 5-

nitroguaiacolate, sodium onitophenolate, and sodium pnitrophenolate) in very low

concentrations. At the application rates

employed, the level of each a.i. which

may be present in any of the food or

feed items would be far below the levels

which demonstrated any effects in the

subchronic oral feeding study, the

developmental toxicity study or the

mutagenicity studies. It can be shown

that in order to reach a dose rate

comparable to the LOAEL of 1,600 mg/

kg/day obtained in the subchronic oral

feeding study, a person weighing 50 kg

(100 lbs.) would have to consume all of

the produce from 4 acres of crop every

day.

Further, due to the rapid uptake and

metabolism of the three a.i. in plants, it

is unlikely that any of the residue would

be available for potential exposure.

2. Drinking water exposure. Similarly,

exposure to humans from consumption

of water would be equally unlikely.

B. Other Non-Occupational Exposure

Using the previously mentioned

criteria, the Agency believes that non–

occupational exposures via other routes

would be highly unlikely. There is no

allowed use of the product containing

the three a.i. on lawns, rights–of–way,

golf courses, or other areas where

human exposure is likely to occur.

Therefore, for all practical purposes,

exposure from these areas would be

non–existent.

V. Cumulative Effects

Exposure through other pesticides

and substances with the same mode of

toxicity is not likely. What little toxicity

that was observed is only detected at

extremely high concentrations of these

a.i..

VI. Determination of Safety for U.S.

Population, Infants and Children

The three a.i. in the End–Use Product,

ATONIK, are all classified as

biochemicals. The low toxicity of each

of these alone and in combination, as

discussed above, demonstrates that

these chemicals, at the rates established,

will not pose any known risk to human

health, either as children or as adults.

These three a.i. are already exempted

from the requirement of a tolerance for

use on cotton, rice, and soybeans.

VII. Other Considerations

A. Endocrine Disruptors

EPA is required under the FFDCA, as

amended by FQPA, to develop a

screening program to determine whether

certain substances (including all

pesticide active and other ingredients)

‘‘may have an effect in humans that is

similar to an effect produced by a

naturally occurring estrogen, or other

such endocrine effects as the

Administrator may designate.’’

Following the recommendations of its

Endocrine Disruptor Screening and

Testing Advisory Committee (EDSTAC),

EPA determined that there was

scientific basis for including, as part of

the program, androgen and thyroid

hormone systems, in addition to the

estrogen hormone system. EPA also

adopted EDSTAC’s recommendation

that the program include evaluations of

potential effects in wildlife. For

66180 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 214 / Friday, November 3, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

pesticide chemicals, EPA will use

FIFRA and, to the extent that effects in

wildlife may help determine whether a

substance may have an effect in

humans, FFDCA authority to require the

wildlife evaluations. As the science

develops and resources allow, screening

of additional hormone systems may be

added to the Endocrine Disruptor

Screening Program (EDSP).

When the appropriate screening and/

or testing protocols being considered

under the EDSP have been developed,

sodium o-nitrophenolate, sodium pnitrophenolate, and sodium 5-

nitoguaiacolate, may be subjected to

additional screening an/or testing to

better characterize effects related to

endocrine disruption. Based on the

weight of the evidence of available data,

no endocrine system–related effect have

been identified.

B. Analytical Method(s)

Adequate data for the end–use

product, ATONIK, and each of the

three components: sodium onitrophenolate, sodium pnitrophenolate, and sodium 5-

nitoguaiacolate, were submitted with

the initial registration and petition for

tolerances.

C. Tolerance Reassessment

The foregoing is a reassessment of the

tolerances for § 180.1139 Sodium 5-

nitoguaiacolate, and § 180.1140 Sodium

o-nitrophenolate, and § 180.1141

Sodium p-nitrophenolate. This

reassessment revises these tolerances to

include all food commodities when

used as plant growth regulators.

D. Codex Maximum Residue Level

No known international tolerances

have been granted for this pesticide.

Therefore, based on the completeness

and reliability of the toxicity data from

the published literature and

conservative exposure assessment, the

Agency concludes that there is a

reasonable certainty that no harm will

result from aggregate exposure to

residues of ATONIK including all

anticipated dietary exposure and all

non–occupational exposures.

VIII. Objections and Hearing Requests

Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as

amended by the FQPA, any person may

file an objection to any aspect of this

regulation and may also request a

hearing on those objections. The EPA

procedural regulations which govern the

submission of objections and requests

for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178.

Although the procedures in those

regulations require some modification to

reflect the amendments made to the

FFDCA by the FQPA of 1996, EPA will

continue to use those procedures, with

appropriate adjustments, until the

necessary modifications can be made.

The new section 408(g) provides

essentially the same process for persons

to ‘‘object’’ to a regulation for an

exemption from the requirement of a

tolerance issued by EPA under new

section 408(d), as was provided in the

old FFDCA sections 408 and 409.

However, the period for filing objections

is now 60 days, rather than 30 days.

A. What Do I Need to Do to File an

Objection or Request a Hearing?

You must file your objection or

request a hearing on this regulation in

accordance with the instructions

provided in this unit and in 40 CFR part

178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,

you must identify docket control

number OPP–301043 in the subject line

on the first page of your submission. All

requests must be in writing, and must be

mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk

on or before January 2, 2001.

1. Filing the request. Your objection

must specify the specific provisions in

the regulation that you object to, and the

grounds for the objections (40 CFR

178.25). If a hearing is requested, the

objections must include a statement of

the factual issues(s) on which a hearing

is requested, the requestor’s contentions

on such issues, and a summary of any

evidence relied upon by the objector (40

CFR 178.27). Information submitted in

connection with an objection or hearing

request may be claimed confidential by

marking any part or all of that

information as CBI. Information so

marked will not be disclosed except in

accordance with procedures set forth in

40 CFR part 2. A copy of the

information that does not contain CBI

must be submitted for inclusion in the

public record. Information not marked

confidential may be disclosed publicly

by EPA without prior notice.

Mail your written request to: Office of

the Hearing Clerk (1900), Environmental

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. You

may also deliver your request to the

Office of the Hearing Clerk in Rm. C400,

Waterside Mall, 401 M St., SW.,

Washington, DC 20460. The Office of

the Hearing Clerk is open from 8 a.m.

to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,

excluding legal holidays. The telephone

number for the Office of the Hearing

Clerk is (202) 260–4865.

2. Tolerance fee payment. If you file

an objection or request a hearing, you

must also pay the fee prescribed by 40

CFR 180.33(i) or request a waiver of that

fee pursuant to 40 CFR 180.33(m). You

must mail the fee to: EPA Headquarters

Accounting Operations Branch, Office

of Pesticide Programs, P.O. Box

360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. Please

identify the fee submission by labeling

it ‘‘Tolerance Petition Fees.’’

EPA is authorized to waive any fee

requirement ‘‘when in the judgement of

the Administrator such a waiver or

refund is equitable and not contrary to

the purpose of this subsection.’’ For

additional information regarding the

waiver of these fees, you may contact

James Tompkins by phone at (703) 305–

5697, by e-mail at

tompkins.jim@epa.gov, or by mailing a

request for information to Mr. Tompkins

at Registration Division (7505C), Office

of Pesticide Programs, Environmental

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.

If you would like to request a waiver

of the tolerance objection fees, you must

mail your request for such a waiver to:

James Hollins, Information Resources

and Services Division (7502C), Office of

Pesticide Programs, Environmental

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.

3. Copies for the docket. In addition

to filing an objection or hearing request

with the Hearing Clerk as described in

Unit VIII.A., you should also send a

copy of your request to the PIRIB for its

inclusion in the official record that is

described in Unit I.B.2. Mail your

copies, identified by docket control

number OPP–301043, to: Public

Information and Records Integrity

Branch, Information Resources and

Services Division (7502C), Office of

Pesticide Programs, Environmental

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. In

person or by courier, bring a copy to the

location of the PIRIB described in Unit

I.B.2. You may also send an electronic

copy of your request via e-mail to: opp–

docket@epa.gov. Please use an ASCII

file format and avoid the use of special

characters and any form of encryption.

Copies of electronic objections and

hearing requests will also be accepted

on disks in WordPerfect 6.1/8.0 file

format or ASCII file format. Do not

include any CBI in your electronic copy.

You may also submit an electronic copy

of your request at many Federal

Depository Libraries.

B. When Will the Agency Grant a

Request for a Hearing?

A request for a hearing will be granted

if the Administrator determines that the

material submitted shows the following:

There is a genuine and substantial issue

of fact; there is a reasonable possibility

that available evidence identified by the

requestor would, if established resolve

one or more of such issues in favor of

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 214 / Friday, November 3, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 66181

the requestor, taking into account

uncontested claims or facts to the

contrary; and resolution of the factual

issues(s) in the manner sought by the

requestor would be adequate to justify

the action requested (40 CFR 178.32).

IX. Regulatory Assessment

Requirements

This final rule establishes an

exemption from the tolerance

requirement under FFDCA section

408(d) in response to a petition

submitted to the Agency. The Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) has

exempted these types of actions from

review under Executive Order 12866,

entitled Regulatory Planning and

Review October 4, 1993 (58 FR 51735).

This final rule does not contain any

information collections subject to OMB

approval under the Paperwork

Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et

seq., or impose any enforceable duty or

contain any unfunded mandate as

described under Title II of the Unfunded

Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)

(Public Law 104–4). Nor does it require

any prior consultation as specified by

Executive Order 13084, entitled

Consultation and Coordination with

Indian Tribal Governments May 19,

1998 (63 FR 27655); special

considerations as required by Executive

Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to

Address Environmental Justice in

Minority Populations and Low-Income

Populations February 16, 1994 (59 FR

7629); or require OMB review or any

Agency action under Executive Order

13045, entitled Protection of Children

from Environmental Health Risks and

Safety Risks April 23, 1997 (62 FR

19885). This action does not involve any

technical standards that would require

Agency consideration of voluntary

consensus standards pursuant to section

12(d) of the National Technology

Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995

(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section

12(d)(15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since

tolerances and exemptions that are

established on the basis of a petition

under FFDCA section 408(d), such as

the exemption in this final rule, do not

require the issuance of a proposed rule,

the requirements of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et

seq.) do not apply. In addition, the

Agency has determined that this action

will not have a substantial direct effect

on States, on the relationship between

the national government and the States,

or on the distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government, as specified in

Executive Order 13132, entitled

Federalism August 10, 1999 (64 FR

43255). Executive Order 13132 requires

EPA to develop an accountable process

to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input

by State and local officials in the

development of regulatory policies that

have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies

that have federalism implications’’ is

defined in the Executive Order to

include regulations that have

‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,

on the relationship between the national

government and the States, or on the

distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government.’’ This final rule

directly regulates growers, food

processors, food handlers and food

retailers, not States. This action does not

alter the relationships or distribution of

power and responsibilities established

by Congress in the preemption

provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4).

X. Submission to Congress and the

Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides

that before a rule may take effect, the

agency promulgating the rule must

submit a rule report, which includes a

copy of the rule, to each House of the

Congress and to the Comptroller General

of the United States. EPA will submit a

report containing this rule and other

required information to the U.S. Senate,

the U.S. House of Representatives, and

the Comptroller General of the United

States prior to publication of this final

rule in the Federal Register. This final

rule is not a ‘‘major rule ’’ as defined by

5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

Environmental protection,

Administrative practice and procedure,

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

Dated: October 6, 2000.

Janet L. Andersen,

Director, Biopesticides and Pollution

Prevention Division.

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is

amended as follows:

PART 180—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 180

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346(a) and

374.

2. In subpart D §180.1139, 180.1140,

and 180.1141 are revised to read as

follows:

§ 180.1139 Sodium 5-nitroguaiacolate;

exemption from the requirements of a

tolerance.

The biochemical sodium 5-

nitroguiacolate is exempted from the

requirement of a tolerance when used as

a plant growth regulator in end–use

products at a concentration of 0.1% by

weight and applied at an application

rate of 20 g of a.i. per acre or less per

application, in or on all food

commodities.

§ 180.1140 Sodium o-nitrophenolate;

exemption from the requirement of a

tolerance.

The biochemical sodium onitrophenolate is exempted from the

requirement of a tolerance when used as

a plant growth regulator in end–use

products at a concentration of 0.2% by

weight and applied at an application

rate of 20 g of a.i. per acre or less per

application, in or on all food

commodities.

§ 180.1141 Sodium p-nitrophenolate;

exemption from the requirement of a

tolerance.

The biochemical sodium pnitrophenolate is exempted from the

requirement of a tolerance when used as

a plant growth regulator in end–use

product at a concentration of 0.3% by

weight and applied at an application

rate of 20 g of a.i. per acre or less per

application, in or on all food

commodities.

[FR Doc. 00–28277 Filed 11–2–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S

FEDERAL EMERGENCY

MANAGEMENT AGENCY

44 CFR Part 65

[Docket No. FEMA–D–7503]

Changes in Flood Elevation

Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency

Management Agency, FEMA.

ACTION: Interim rule.

SUMMARY: This interim rule lists

communities where modification of the

base (1% annual chance) flood

elevations is appropriate because of new

scientific or technical data. New flood

insurance premium rates will be

calculated from the modified base flood

elevations for new buildings and their

contents.

DATES: These modified base flood

elevations are currently in effect on the

dates listed in the table and revise the

Flood Insurance Rate Map(s) (FIRMs) in