alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CLIENT SERVICE AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this eleventh day of
March,    1997   by   and   between   MEDIACOMM    MARKETING
INTERNATIONAL,  located at 200 Union Boulevard,  Suite  440,
Denver, Colorado 80228, hereinafter sometimes referred to as
(MMI)  and  RED  OAK  HEREFORD FARMS INC.  located  at  2010
Commerce  Drive, Red Oak, Iowa 51566, hereinafter  sometimes
referred to as ("HERF") or the ("Company").

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS,  MMI  is  a financial public relations  and  direct
marketing advertising firm specializing in the dissemination
of information about publicly traded companies, and;

WHEREAS,  HERF, represents a publicly held  or  soon  to  be
publicly held company with its common stock trading  on  one
or  more stock exchanges and/or Over The Counter, NASDAQ  or
the Vancouver Stock Exchange, and;

WHEREAS, HERF, desires to publicize its representative  with
the  intention of making its name and business better  known
to its shareholders, investors, and brokerage houses, and;

WHEREAS,  MMI is willing to accept the Company,  on  a  best
efforts basis, as a client.

NOW  THEREFORE,  in  consideration of the  mutual  covenants
herein contained, it is agreed:

      1.   INFORMATION PACKAGE: The Company shall furnish an
Information Package to MMI including disclosure  and  filing
materials, financial statements, business plans, promotional
materials, annual reports and press releases. MMI  may  rely
on, and assume the accuracy of the Information Package.

      2.    MARKETING  PROGRAM:  Based  on  the  information
Package,  MMI  will initiate and complete  all  service  set
forth  proposal  dated March 11, 1997 with  adjustments  for
later starting date and/or holiday consideration.

      3.    TIME  OF  PERFORMANCE: Services to be  performed
under this Agreement shall commence March 17, 1997 and shall
continue  until completion, which generally is  expected  to
occur within three months.

     4.   COMPENSATION AND EXPENSES: In consideration of the
services to be performed by MMI, the Company agrees to pay
compensation to MMI of $90,000.00 U.S. in cash as set forth
below, time being of  the essence.

     5.   PAYMENT: MMI shall be entitled to receive from the
Company installments, upon the following terms and
conditions:

          (A) $30,000.00 (cash) Due March 17, 1997.
          (B) $30,000.00 (cash) Due April 14, 1997.
          (C) $30,000.00 (cash) Due May 12, 1997.

     6.   ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT: This writing contains the
entire agreement of the parties and excludes any verbal
guarantees, assurances or representations. Proper venue and
jurisdiction shall be in the District Court in Denver
County, Colorado.

<PAGE>

Executed as a sealed instrument as of the day and year first
above written.

MEDIACOMM MARKETING INTERNATIONAL, INC.


BY:____________________________DATE: 3/11/97
   Don Montague - President



RED OAK HEREFORD FARMS INC.


BY:___________________________ DATE: 3/1/97
   Gordon Reisinger- President

<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 4 (Thursday, January 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-283]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

December 28, 1999.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before February 7, 
2000, to be assured of consideration.

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)

    OMB Number: New (Formerly under 1515-0079).
    Form Number: Customs Form 4790.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Report of International Transportation of Currency or 
Monetary Instruments (CMIR).
    Description: Persons transporting into or out of the United States 
(and persons receiving in the United States) more than $10,000 in 
currency or monetary instruments must file a CMIR.
    Respondents: Individuals or households, business or other for-
profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 180,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 11 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 33,000 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Lois K. Holland, (202) 622-1563, Departmental 
Offices, Room 2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-283 Filed 1-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-U
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Stratus Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies,
to such officer’s knowledge:



(1) This Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2012 (“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



| | Date:  April 16, 2013          
| | -------------------------------
| |                                
| | /s/ Jerold Rubinstein          
| |                                
| | Name:  Jerold Rubinstein       
| |                                
| | Title:  Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany
the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the
date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                              1,026
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      18,940
<ALLOWANCES>                          662
<INVENTORY>                        65,841
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   87,610
<PP&E>                             46,113
<DEPRECIATION>                      5,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    128,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              95,099
<BONDS>                             1,169
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                4
<OTHER-SE>                         21,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      128,036
<SALES>                            40,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   40,365
<CGS>                              37,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      41,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    (251)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  1,768
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (2,168)
<INCOME-TAX>                        (880)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (1,288)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (1,288)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (.39)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-12464 and 333-12518) and Form F-3 (No.
333-13480) of Netia Holdings S.A. of our report dated February 13, 2003 relating
to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in Netia Holdings S.A.
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002.







PricewaterhouseCoopers Sp. z o.o.





Warsaw, Poland

June 27, 2003
Exhibit 23.1





INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Alliqua, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8(File No. 333-105083) of our report dated March 31, 2011, with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Alliqua, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alliqua, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/ Marcum llp





Marcum llp


New York, New York


March 31, 2011
#### THIBODEAUX v. STATE.

No. 24522.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1949.

No appearance for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for murder with malice and the punishment assessed at ten years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record, as brought forward, contains neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and the proceedings appear regular in every respect.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
. . 

### 625

**OFFICE OF**  

### THE **AlTORNEY GENERAL**  **OF TEXAS**  **AUSTlN**



### Eonormblo

L. A. 

### Wtir atrtr 

### 8uprrl.ntrnaiult 0r l'ublio

Irlrtnlot 

### Aaatin,Tour 

### Dmr 8irt Attmtlonr Mr. **chid** 

### cmk urd Tooatlonel

Did

to 

### end rr6m af Ur. 8. **A.**

**mr0t0t or**  **~-0 monoraior**  

### r; or dtrading the 

### rbotroon

### tiolrtlon

or thrOonrralAs9roprtitloa

bill **0r** 

### thrUth Lo6lrletPro brownen 84n8toEill r27?. .

Eoaoablr L. A. wooda, pego 9

*2. Can the State Ls~lalaturr prrtent **by** It8 eote tha MO of FederelFunda eP9ro9rlatd by the Coagrraa or tha United Stetaa for e apaoffio purpose rhea this Fabrral mnay ia on drpoaitritb the State Treasurer?” If thr moaqa to br pei4 la dafreyllrg the Upm808 or the propo6sil trip8 to Oraund Rapida, mohigen, em to ba peid *uolualral~ tron rederel funda,r in tha au180 thet they ere aot to **br** peid **bf** warred **dram on**  the Stat. 

### Truaaurar of Tuna, t&a 

### theproriaionaooatelnad In Seaata Bill Ho. 

### 07 paasad **by the**  mowat madon oi 

### thrTuaa Laglsletwe oan **bairo** no brarlrqg thare**0%** 

### If,howetrr, 

### JOQmean

### br yourpuratlon 

### that tho r868rel aan~ys hem be~oapeld Into the State Treeaurr, then the -anewer to your rtret qusatlon la mmtrolled by the following prorlalon In the goner81 rider ts7t;e depertaantal appropriation bill (-to Bill. :

‘Any such 

### federalfund8ea ae~ be drposite;d in the State Treasury end hareby eppropriatrd to the apaolfio purpoaa authorized by the iredrral Coterornt. a We60 not hem before ue the aot,order or reguletlon purauent to which the mor+y to uhioh fou **ref#r** we8 dolirsred br the 

### fadaralgovsrnaaat. If the propoaed trip of t&ear three state mployeer may be reaaoaablr ooaatruod to b0 within auoh ~apcoiflo purpoaam, warrenta In pameat or theix trawling expeaere nay be propsrly dram by tha C-Ptroller lgaiaet

the proper fund la the Stata lbXa8WY* w0 Pm8t uaolino to eaawcr your rrcond quartion for tha reeaon thst the easia ia hppothetioel. Youra Yuy truly
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of LaSalle Hotel Properties (LHO) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jon E. Bortz, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of LHO, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report, containing the financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LHO.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 19, 2009



/s/    JON E. BORTZJon E. BortzChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40437 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

VICENTE GONZALEZ

- LUCAS, also known as Raul Gonzalez

- Lucas, also known as Miguel Gonzales

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14

- CR

- 1780

- 1

Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Vicente Gonzalez

- Lucas

raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v.

Rodriguez , 711 F.3d 541, 56 2

- 63 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), in which we held

that the generic, contemporary definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” do es not

require the age of consent to be below 1 7 years old

. T he motion for summary

disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED

December 1 5 , 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40437 Document: 00513307454 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7561

CHARLES WOODROW TAGGART,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

D. R. GUILLORY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-341)

Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 19, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Woodrow Taggart, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells,

Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Taggart v. Guillory, No. CA96-341 (E.D. Va. Sept. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1 The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-2742

___________ Janet Elizabeth Moore, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, * also known as Wal-Mart, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: November 26, 2010 Filed: December 2, 2010

___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Janet Moore appeals the District Court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action agai nst Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. After careful de novo review, see Murphy v. Mo. Dep’t of Corr. , 372 F.3d 979, 982 (8th Cir. 2004), we affirm for the reasons explained by the District Court in its thorough opinion. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the District Court. See8th Cir. R. 47B.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 5, 2014

NO. 03-14-00330-CV

Lester Tengley, Appellant

v.

Limestone Canyon Apts., Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on April 30, 2014. Having 

reviewed the record, the Court holds that Lester Tengley has not prosecuted his appeal and did 

not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal 

for want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication 

of costs is made.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 112 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 112

   To express the sense of Congress in support of consumer labeling 
utilizing an American and foreign flag program, labeling all goods and 
                               services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 1993

 Mrs. Bentley submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   To express the sense of Congress in support of consumer labeling 
utilizing an American and foreign flag program, labeling all goods and 
                               services.

Whereas it is important to secure American growth in a competitive global 
        economy;
Whereas many Americans would prefer to buy American goods and services;
Whereas a program labeling all goods and services with American flags and 
        foreign flags, provides accessible consumer information to enable 
        citizens to identify products that are made by Americans with parts that 
        are made in America in companies that are American-owned;
Whereas providing this information by utilizing American and foreign flags, 
        enables Americans to buy American products, promotes American 
        enterprises, and helps protect American jobs;
Whereas a program of American and foreign flag labeling empowers industries in 
        the United States by emphasizing the importance of United States product 
        integrity in relation to the future of the economic survival of the 
        United States;
Whereas over two dozen major American companies have begun labeling their 
        products with American flags and foreign flags; and
Whereas South Dakota and Iowa Legislatures have endorsed the concept of 
        consumers utilizing flags: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
It is the sense of Congress in support of consumer labeling utilizing 
an American and foreign flag program for labeling all goods and 
services.

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 8**

 

**List of Principal Subsidiaries**

**of**

**Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V.**

** **
| **Subsidiary**                                                | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------|
| **Gruma Corporation**                                         |       | Nevada,   United States                     |
| **Azteca Milling, L.P.**                                      |       | Texas,   United States                      |
| **Compañía Nacional Almacenadora,   S.A. de. C.V.** |       | Mexico                                      |

 

----
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 232 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 232

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.






103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 232

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, March 
24, 1994, it stand adjourned until noon on Tuesday, April 12, 1994, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of 
business on Friday, March 25, 1994, Saturday, March 26, 1994, Monday, 
March 28, 1994, Tuesday, March 29, 1994, Wednesday, March 30, 1994, or 
Thursday, March 31, 1994, pursuant to a motion 
made by the majority leader or his designee, in accordance with this 
resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, April 
11, 1994, or at such time on that day as may be specified by the 
majority leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the minority leader of 
the House and the minority leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 24, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
Case 3:22-cv-00470-S-BH Document 5 Filed 04/14/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

DAVID SAMBRANO, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v. No. 4:21-cv-1074-P

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.,

Defendant.

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 

filed September 22, 2021. ECF No. 5. The Court held a two-day

evidentiary hearing on the Motion from October 13 to 14, 2021. See ECF 

No. 49. At this hearing, the parties referenced certain regulations and 

collective bargaining agreements that may be probative to the Court’s 

analysis of the Motion. For instance, the parties cited 14 C.F.R. § 117.3 

at the hearing as one such regulation. But the parties’ previous filings 

did not address these materials in sufficient depth. Nor did any 

representatives from the pertinent unions offer testimony or input on 

how these materials may impact the Court’s analysis. Indeed, in the 

present case, the unions thus far elected to remain silent. 

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiffs and Defendant to file

briefing to address the issues presented by regulations and collective 

bargaining agreements that are most germane to the Court’s analysis of 

the Motion, with a 15-page limit, by October 19, 2021 at 11:59 p.m.

SO ORDERED on this 15th day of October, 2021.

Case 4:21-cv-01074-P Document 68 Filed 10/15/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID 656