alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OCTOBER TERM, 1726.

#### John Greaves’s Lessee *against*John Dempsy et Uxor.

THIS was an ejectment for a tract of land called Feme, lying in *Charles*County. At the trial the following special verdict was found, viz.

We of the Jury find that *Mathias O’Bryan*was seised in fee of the land in dispute, and had issue, *Eleanor O’Bryan*by one venter, and *William O’Bryan*by another venter, and died seised of the said land. We find that *William*his son entered into the said land, was thereof *66seised and possessed in his demesne as of fee; and being so ^lereo^ seised died without issue, and intestate, by means whereof the said land became escheat to the Lord Proprietary, for default of heirs of the said *William.*We find the Lord Proprietary by his grant in due form of law, under the great seal of the Province of *Maryland*in the year 1/25, granted the same to the said *John*Greaves, the lessor of the plaintiff, in fee-simple.

We find that there was not any inquisition or office found or returned into the Chancery, or any other Court of *Ma*ryland,, of the said escheat, or the Lord Proprietary’s title thereto.

We find that *Eleanor*O’Bryan, sister of the half blood of the said *William*O’Bryan, in the year 1/03, by deed duly executed, acknowledged and recorded, gave and granted the said land to the defendant Mary, then called *Mary*Connell, in fee-simple; by virtue whereof the said *Mary*entered into the possession of the said land, and hath ever since continued in the full and quiet possession thereof until the ejectment brought. We find the lease, entry, and ouster mentioned in the declaration and rule, and if, &c.

The Provincial Court gave judgment upon a special verdict for the plaintiff.

Lib. W. G. No. 2. folio 523.

*D. Dulany’s*short notes.

We find an escheat and a grant thereon to the plaintiff. A long possession and no office found. *Stat.*8 *H.*VI. cap. 16. 18 *H.*VI. cap. 6. Vide 14 *Ed.*III. cap. 8. about escheators. *Plow.*216, 217. 2 *Blac. Com.*230. Land to esGheat for want of the heirs of the whole blood.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 215 (Monday, November 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel Review of U54 applications.
    Date: December 4-5, 2000.
    Time: 7:30 pm to 3:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Vesailles IV Room, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Jon M. Ranhand, PhD, Scientist Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health, and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5E03, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301)534-6884.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 30, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-28339 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-00119-L

§

TROY DONTAE WILLIAMS §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent 

of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, 

and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the 

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the 

Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and 

TROY DONTAE WILLIAMS is hereby adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), namely, Felon in Possession of a Firearm. 

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

☒ The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court accepts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence that the 

defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released and should therefore 

be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions 

of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the defendant is likely to flee or pose a 

danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of whether it has 

been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be 

detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is 

not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This 

matter shall be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

SIGNED this 8th day of September, 2022.

________________________________________

SAM A. LINDSAY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cr-00119-L Document 31 Filed 09/08/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 58
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 214 (Friday, November 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28272]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List, Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Additions to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List commodities and a 
service to be furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are 
blind or have other severe disablities.

EFFECTIVE DATE:  December 4, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3259.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Louis R. Bartlot, (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 25, September 1and 15, 2000 the 
Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled 
published notices (65 FR 51794, 53267 and 55939) of proposed additions 
to the Procurement List.
    After consideration of the material presented to it concerning 
capability of qualified nonprofit agencies to provide the commodities 
and service and impact of the additions on the current or most recent 
contractors, the Committee has determined that the commodities and 
service listed below are suitable for procurement by the Federal 
Government under 41 U.S.C. 46-48c and 41 CFR 51-2.4.
    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the commodities and 
service to the Government.
    2. The action will not have a severe economic impact on current 
contractors for the commodities and service.
    3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the commodities and service to the Government.
    4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the commodities and service proposed for 
addition to the Procurement List.
    Accordingly, the following commodities and service are hereby added 
to the Procurement List:

Commodities

CRT and Keyboard Cleaner
7045-01-247-6020
Strip, Door
3920-02-000-1916

Service

Janitorial/Custodial
Department of Veterans Affairs, BRECC VA Clinic, 3800 Loch Raven 
Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland

    This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to the 
effective date of this addition or options that may be exercised under 
those contracts.

Louis R. Bartalot,
Deputy Director (Operations).
[FR Doc. 00-28272 Filed 11-02-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 0651 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 -NM - 041 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 11.1
<TABLE>    
<CAPTION>
  

                         OPEN ENVIRONMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                          COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED          NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                               SEPTEMBER 30,               SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                     
                                              1996        1995            1996        1995
                                          -----------  ----------      ----------  ---------- 
<S>                                      <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Weighted average shares of
  common stock outstanding                  7,560,619    7,408,984      7,518,797    6,326,243
 
Common stock equivalents:
  Series A Convertible Preferred
   Shares                                                                              377,289
 
  Dilutive effect of stock options                       1,163,141                   1,215,795
                                           ----------   ----------     ----------    ---------
                                            7,560,619    8,572,125      7,518,797    7,919,327
                                           ==========   ==========     ==========    =========
 
Net income (loss)                         ($4,490,375)   $ 266,978   ($17,135,985)  $1,465,008
                                           ==========   ==========    ===========    =========
Net income (loss) per share                    ($0.59)       $0.03         ($2.28)       $0.18
                                           ==========   ==========    ===========    =========
 
</TABLE>     
 
                                      12
#### DUNN v. STATE.

No. 22874.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 31, 1944.

W. C. McDonald and D. I. Durham, both of San Angelo, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for transporting whisky in dry area, punishment a fine of $100.

No statement of facts is brought forward. Objections to the court’s charge and refusal of special charges cannot be appraised in the absence of the facts.

The judgment is affirmed.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 4, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131879 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

MARY MULLINS, Personal Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices Nina F. Mullins, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 131879 

 COA: 263210 

Washtenaw CC: 03-000812-NH 

ST. JOSEPH MERCY HOSPITAL,

d/b/a ST. JOSEPH MERCY 

HEALTH SYSTEM, JASON

WHITE, M.D., RAFAEL J. 

GROSSMAN, M.D., and 

KIMBERLY STEWART, M.D.,

 Defendants-Appellees 

and 

JAMES R. BENGSTON, and

WALTER WHITEHOUSE, M.D.,

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 11, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. 

The Michigan Trial Lawyers Association, Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., 

Michigan Health and Hospital Association, and Michigan State Medical Society are 

invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the 

determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to 

file briefs amicus curiae. 

l0328 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 4, 2007 

 Clerk
Case 4:22-cv-00304-O Document 1 Filed 04/13/22 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1
Case 4:22-cv-00304-O Document 1 Filed 04/13/22 Page 2 of 10 PageID 2
Case 4:22-cv-00304-O Document 1 Filed 04/13/22 Page 3 of 10 PageID 3
Case 4:22-cv-00304-O Document 1 Filed 04/13/22 Page 4 of 10 PageID 4
Case 4:22-cv-00304-O Document 1 Filed 04/13/22 Page 5 of 10 PageID 5
Case 4:22-cv-00304-O Document 1 Filed 04/13/22 Page 6 of 10 PageID 6
Case 4:22-cv-00304-O Document 1 Filed 04/13/22 Page 7 of 10 PageID 7
Case 4:22-cv-00304-O Document 1 Filed 04/13/22 Page 8 of 10 PageID 8
Case 4:22-cv-00304-O Document 1 Filed 04/13/22 Page 9 of 10 PageID 9
Case 4:22-cv-00304-O Document 1 Filed 04/13/22 Page 10 of 10 PageID 10
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 11.1

                  OPEN ENVIRONMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
                   Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Share
                                             

<TABLE>    
<CAPTION> 
                                  Three Months  Ended June 30     Six Months    Ended June 30
                                      1995          1994             1995           1994
                                 -------------  -------------    ------------   -------------
                                   (restated)                       (restated) 
<S>                             <C>             <C>              <C>            <C>
Weighted average shares of
  common stock outstanding
Common stock equivalents:          6,928,430      4,670,760        5,775,897      4,849,467
  Series A Convertible               
    Preferred Shares                 142,857        857,141          569,060        430,938 
  Dilutive effect of               
    stock options                  1,270,376      1,153,770        1,271,550        808,482 
                                 -----------    -----------      -----------     ----------
                                   8,341,663      6,681,671        7,616,507      6,088,887
                                 ===========    ===========      ===========     ==========
 
Net income (loss)                 $  848,769     $   71,261       $1,198,032     $    1,484
                                 ===========    ===========      ===========     ==========
 
Net income (loss) per share            $0.10          $0.01            $0.16          $0.00
                                 ===========    ===========      ===========     ==========
</TABLE>
Case 3:22-cr-00095-K Document 61 Filed 05/04/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 208
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

K.D.G., I NC. d/b/a WILDCAT
, Appellant,

v.

WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, and COHEN DANIA BEACH HOTEL, LLC, a foreign limited liability company

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 18

- 3314

[ June 12, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Mily Rodriguez

- Powell , Judge; L.T. Case No. 17

- 006588 (03)

.

Michael J. Yates of the Law Offices of Michael J. Yates, P.L., Miami, for appellant.

Alex P. Rosenthal, Amanda Jassem Jones

, and Rhiannon Sforza

- Flick of Rosenthal Law Group, Weston, for appellee s

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. See Lee v. All Fla. Const r . Co.

, 662 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

D AMOORGIAN
, L EVINE and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 22, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 22, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18D0172. ERIC K. HUFFMAN v. LINDA HUFFMAN.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2015CV266173
From: Kyle Baker - NOAA Federal [kyle.baker@noaa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:07 AM

To: Land, Eva

Cc: jon_hemming@fws.gov; Fortin, Kelly; Shepherd, Lorinda

Subject: Re: BA for New OCS Permit Applications Submitted to EPA

NMFS has not yet completed any consultations on lease sales or permits under the 2012-2017 

lease plan. We just received a BA from BOEM and BSEE for lease sale actions under lease 

sales held through the year 2022. The EPA is a co-action agency on this consultation. BOEM 

has determined that their current regulatory measures in place are sufficient until a new 

consultaiton is completed. I am uncertain how that determination effects permit application 

submitted to the EPA under those lease sales. I recommend first conferring with your BOEM 

contacts since their is no current biological opinion looking forward. BOEM is working under 

the opinion prepared for the 2007-2012 lease plan until consultation is completed. 

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Land, Eva <Land.Eva@epa.gov> wrote:

Mr. Baker and Mr. Hemming:

The EPA Region 4 has received three additional Outer Continental Shelf permit applications 

from Statoil Gulf Services, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, and Shell Offshore Inc. These 

applications are covered by BOEM lease sales and the following Environmental Impact 

Statements: Gulf of Mexico OCS Oil and Gas Lease Sales: 2007-2012 Final Environmental 

Impact Statement and the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Gas Leasing Program: 2012-2017 Final 

Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. This email is to confirm that the current 

Biological Assessment remains in place until a new Biological Assessment is issued. 

Please contact EPA by March 6, 2013, if you do not concur.

Thank you.

Eva Land

--

Kyle Baker
NOAA Fisheries Service

Protected Resources Division

o: 727-824-5312

f: 727-824-5309