alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Administrative

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Committee of Chairs of the Industry Sector and Functional Advisory Committees will hold a meeting on November 28, 2000, from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. The meeting will be closed to the public from 2:00 p.m. to 3:15 p.m., and opened to the public from 3:15 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to discuss the review of the Trade Advisory Committee System.

# DATES:

The meeting is scheduled for November 28, 2000, unless otherwise notified.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, Conference Room 1, located at 1724 F Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., unless otherwise notified.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sylvia Prosak, (202) 482-3268, Department of Commerce, 14th St. and Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230, or Dominic Bianchi, Office of the United States Trade Representative, 1724 F. St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20508, (202) 395-6120.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

During the opened portion of the meeting the Committee of Chairs will present their report on recommendations for reform of the Trade Advisory System.

Dominic Bianchi,

Acting Assistant United States Trade Representative for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Liaison.

[FR Doc. 00-28518  Filed 11-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:Petition for exemption/rule making.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         227,728
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,158
<ALLOWANCES>                                   4,413
<INVENTORY>                                    27,569
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               418,808
<PP&E>                                         1,047,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                 558,682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,110,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,025,541
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    692
<COMMON>                                       7,806
<OTHER-SE>                                     (227,844)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,110,503
<SALES>                                        374,610
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               374,610
<CGS>                                          83,878
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,247,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               335          
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0            
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,005        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (962,979)    
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0            
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (962,979)    
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0            
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0            
<CHANGES>                                      0            
<NET-INCOME>                                   (962,979)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.14)        
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.14)        
                                                            
                                               

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Amended Annual Report of Entrust Financial Services, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2001 as
filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report). I, David Hite, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 USC § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ David Hite
David Hite, Chief Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------

Dated:
08/22/02
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________**
No. 22

- 10729

**____________ Priscilla A. Ellis,** 

Plaintiff

— Appellant **,**

versus

**United States of America; Michael Caravajal,** Federal Bureau of Prisons Director **,**
Defendants

— Appellees

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21

- CV

- 992

**___________________ ___________** 
Before **Elrod, Graves,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Priscilla A. Ellis, federal prisoner # 03260

- 180, moves to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal following the district court’s denial of her Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion and her motion to reconsider the denial of the Rule 60(b) motion. These motions were filed following the
dismissal of her civil rights action for failure to timely comply with the district
court’s order to file an amended complaint using the court’s prisoner civil

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir . R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 19, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-10729 Document: 00516616238 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/19/2023No. 22

- 10729

2 rights form. See **Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(** b). Ellis ’s IFP m otion challenge s the district court’s determination that the appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). This court’s inquiry into whether the appeal is taken in good faith “is limited to whether the appeal involves ‘legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).’” Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (citation omitted).

In her appellate filings, Ellis largely discusses the merits of her
constitutional claims and mentions that she did not file an amended complaint because she did not receive the order requiring her to do so. However, even assuming her allegation to be true, Ellis had ample opportunity to seek to comply with the district court’s order when she
learned of it shortly after the court imposed deadline. However, she did not seek to comply then or in the ensuing 10 months leading to this appeal. Ellis
does not make the requisite showing that s he has a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See H oward , 707 F.2d at 220. Accordingly, her motion to proceed

IFP is **DENIED** , and her appeal is **DISMISSED** as frivolous. See Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; **5th Cir. R. 42.2**

**.** The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous count s as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996), abrogated in part on other grounds by Coleman v. Tollefson , 575 U.S. 532, 537 (2015)

. Ellis is **WARNED** that if s he accumulates three strikes, s he w ill not be permitted to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while incarcerated or detained in any facility unless s he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). Case: 22-10729 Document: 00516616238 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/19/2023
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

November 8, 2019

t1105

Order 

Clerk

November 8, 2019

160254

In re ALTANTAWI, Minors. SC: 160254

COA: 345779

Oakland CC Family Division:

 2017-856888-NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 27, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CHAVALIER DWAYNE JOHNSON, SR.,

Appellant,

v.

DR. NICHOLS, et al.,

Appellee s

.

No. 4D 20

- 684

[ February 4, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Okeechobee County ; Laurie E. Buchanan , Judge; L.T. Case No.

472019CA000308

.

Chavalier Dwayne Johnson, Sr., Florida City, pro se appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Lindsey L. Miller

- Hailey,

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee Florida Department

of Corrections

.

No brief filed for appellee Florida Department of Corrections.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, M AY and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Case 4:22-cr-00034-O Document 161 Filed 03/23/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 463
Case 4:22-cr-00034-O Document 161 Filed 03/23/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 464
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Form 10-K for the Year ended December 31, 2008, pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Omega Protein Corporation, certifies,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Omega Protein Corporation.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 10, 2009



/s/ JOSEPH L. VON ROSENBERG, IIIJoseph L. von Rosenberg, III President and Chief Executive Officer


This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Omega Protein Corporation or the certifying officer for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Omega Protein Corporation and will be
retained by Omega Protein Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000938322
<NAME> CIGF II
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         336,441
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  373,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               429,644
<PP&E>                                      14,736,504
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,731,309)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,144,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,019,961
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,124,464
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,144,425
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,293,784
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,865,422
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             121,649
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                306,713
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            306,713
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   306,713
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 25, 2011

t0718 

# Order

July 25, 2011

142853 & (52)

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,

v SC: 142853 COA: 294411 Ct of Claims: 06-000003-MT DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 17, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered, and they are DENI ED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court pr ior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.
EXHIBIT 32.1 TO 10-QSB
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of Prologic Management Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James M. Heim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to
the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company for the periods presented.



                                 /s/ James M. Heim
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 James M. Heim
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Prologic Management Systems, Inc.
                                 February 14, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Cyco.net,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  each  of the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.   The information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date:  April 12, 2004                    By:    /s/ Daniel Urrea
                                              -----------------------------
                                                Daniel Urrea,
                                                Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cyco.net,  Inc. and will
be retained by Cyco.net,  Inc.  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Family , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 20 2 2

- Ohio

- 250 7 .]

C OLUMBUS B AR A SSOCIATION v . F AMILY . [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Family , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 20 2 2

- Ohio

- 250 7 .] (No. 20 21

- 0978

— Submitted July 21 , 202 2

— Decided July 22
, 20 2 2 .)

O N A PPLICATION FOR R EINSTATEMENT

.

__________________ __ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Christian Manning Family, Attorney Registration No. 0074728, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 17, 2021, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of 18 months, with the final 12 months stayed on the conditions, finds that respondent has complied with that order and with the

pr ovisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24)

. {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the s tate of Ohio. It is further ordered that in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(21) and consistent with the opinion rendered herei n on November 17, 2021, respondent shall serve a two

- year period of monitored probation. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that on or before 30 days from the date of this order relator shall file with the clerk of this court the name of the attorney who will

serv e as respondent ’ s monitor, in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(21)(A)(3). It is further ordered that at the end of respondent ’ s probationary period, relator shall file with the clerk of this court a report indicating whether respondent, during the probationar y period, complied with the terms of the probation. {¶ 5} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R. V(21). It is further ordered that respondent ’ s probation shal l not be terminated untilS UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 (1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in compliance with Gov.Bar R. V(21)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all other orders issued by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the G overnment of the Bar of Ohio, (4) relator files with the clerk of this court a report indicating that respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, and (5) this court orders that the probation be terminated. {¶ 6} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 7} For earlier case, see Columbus Bar Assn. v. Family , 167 Ohio St.3d 32, 2021

- Ohio

- 4054, 188 N.E.3d 1042.
O ’C ONNOR , C.J., and K ENNEDY , F ISCHER , D E W INE , D ONNELLY , S TEWART , and B RUNNER , JJ., concur.

_______________ __
#### PATMAN v. STATE.

No. 26426.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 13, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State. •' '

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing, regular and nothing being presented ■ for our review, the judgment of the trial court is afr firmed.
#### THOMASSON v. COMMONWEALTH LIFE INS. CO.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 29, 1953.

Van Sant &Young, Frankfort, Kenneth Tuggle, Barbourville, for appellant.

Glenn H. Stephens, Williamsburg, for appellee. ■ . -

PER .CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a, judgment of the Whitley Circuit Court denying recovery . upon a life insurance- policy in the amount of $1,000. , .

Appeal was granted in the lower .court on May 28, 1952, which -was 'prior to.the effective date of the 1952 Amendment to KRS 21.080. However, the record was not filed in this Court within the time prescribed by Civil Code of Practice, Section 738. The motion for an appeal here was filed on February 27, 1953. The appeal is, therefore, controlled by the 1952 Amendment to KRS 21.080.

We have examined the record and briefs of counsel, and in our opinion, the lower court properly directed a verdict for the insurer because of false and incomplete information contained in that part of the application designated as “Declarations in Lieu of Medical Examination.”

The motion for an appeal is, therefore, denied and the judgment is affirmed without written'opinion. ,