alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED AUGUST 8, 2012 . Jt:PARTMENTOF 

US D-EPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION: t';,\t\i.SPOHTATION . . . . OFFICE OF HEARINGS . :Hj('!~tOPERATIONS 

WASHINGTON, DC lrHZ -8· p 1: I q. 

In The Matter Of: 

ELITE AIR, INC. 

Respondent 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

DocketNo~ FAA-2011-1125 

Case No. 2012 SO 150236 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

. On August 7, 2012, the Complainant, the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA), 

filed a Notice of Settlement/Withdrawal ()f Complaint. There is a Hearing currently set in this matter, 

It Is Hereby Ordered: .. 

.. 1) The Hearing set on August 28, 2012- August 29, 20I2 in the Tampa, Florida 

metropolitan area is cancelled. 

2) Pursuant to I4 C.F.R. §13.2I5, the Complainant, the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), has Withdrawn its Complaint dated November 2I, 

20 II, and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. . :· 

Attachment: Service List 
FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1125 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL and FAX 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Admini~tration 

800 Independence Avenue; S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

B. Gray Gibbs, President 

Elite Air, Inc., Respondent 

100 Second A venue South 

Suite 101-S 

St. Petersburg, FL 33701 

· TEL: 727-896-5880 

FAX: 727-892-9902 

ONE COPY 

Ryan M. Landers, Complainant's Counsel 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AEA-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable J. E. Sullivan, .&!dministrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

.. ., 

. . 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For serviCe in person or by exp~dited colirier, use the followirig\1ddress: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence A venue, S. W ., Wilbirr Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 05/31 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5


<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              49,834
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,267,379
<PP&E>                                             331,327
<DEPRECIATION>                                      82,734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,625,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,858,736
<BONDS>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                            31,127
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,736,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,767,144
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,533,165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,533,165)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,533,165)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,533,165)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.16)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Dallas Division

ROBERT HOPKINS, III, *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

v. * Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-00706 (C)

*

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, *

*

Defendant. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORDER

UPON CONSIDERATION OF Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Future Deadlines, any 

Opposition thereto, and the entire record herein, it is this _______ day of __________, 2023, 

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED.

_______________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00706-C Document 15-1 Filed 05/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 383
Case 2:22-cr-00026-Z-BR Document 78 Filed 08/04/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 195
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 237 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 237

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the 13th annual National 
                   Peace Officers' Memorial Service.






103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 237

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' MEMORIAL 
              SERVICE.

    The National Fraternal Order of Police and its auxiliary shall be 
permitted to sponsor a public event, the 13th annual National Peace 
Officers' Memorial Service, on the Capitol grounds on May 15, 1994, or 
on such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and 
the President pro tempore of the Senate may jointly designate, in order 
to honor the 151 law enforcement officers who died in the line of duty 
during 1993.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--The event authorized to be conducted on the 
Capitol grounds under section 1 shall be free of admission charge to 
the public and arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress, 
under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and 
the Capitol Police Board.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The National Fraternal Order of 
Police and its auxiliary shall assume full responsibility for all 
expenses and liabilities incident to all activities associated with the 
event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    (a) Structures and Equipment.--Subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, the National Fraternal Order of Police and 
its auxiliary are authorized to erect upon the Capitol grounds such 
stage, sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event authorized to be conducted 
on the Capitol grounds under section 1.
    (b) Additional Arrangements.--The Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board are authorized to make any such additional 
arrangements as may be required to carry out the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
EXHIBIT 10.41
                                                                   -------------

                                 HOUSE OF BLUES
                               "RUN OF THE HOUSE"
                                SUMMER PROMO CDK

1)    BACKGROUND

House of Blues will be running a summer promotion entitled "Run of the House"
giving fans the opportunity to win two (2) all access passes to House of Blues
venues around the country. The promotion is being supported by online
advertising as well as the distribution of 2 million multimedia CDs at the
various House of Blues venues during July and August. The CDs, to be produced by
CDKnet, will include information on the promotion, with a link to an online
entry form, as well as video clips and interviews from House of Blues
performances.

Additionally, the CD will include a software installation for a "Music Vflash"
that will provide fans with music news, artist info, performance schedules, Web
case announcements, etc.


2)   SPONSORSHIP

We are happy to offer PlanetGiving.com sponsorship of the HOB summer promo CDK.
Sponsorship includes a presence on the main interface page with links to both
local and remote Web pages. We will also include a :15 PlanetGiving.com PSA to
be viewed within the CDK Video Player.

Once we determine the scope of the communication points for the PlanetGiving.com
pages, you can either develop them in-house or our team can assist.


3)   PRICING

As agreed to previously, PlanetGiving.com will fund the sponsorship at a rate of
$0.185 per CD, for a total cost of $370,000.

Your signature below indicates acceptance of the terms of this proposal.



/s/ Russell Kern  6/1/00                           /s/  Victor E. Gatto, Jr.
----------------                                   -------------------------
Russell Kern                                       Victor E. Gatto, Jr.
ValueFlash.com, Inc.                               ACUSA.com
#### WILLIARD v. STATE.

No. 23848.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 14, 1948.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 18, 1948.

John T. Nicholson, Co. Atty., of Comanche, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

J. M. Parker, of Gorman, for appellant.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a fine of $250 on a charge of possessing liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area.

The sheriff and a number of other officers went to the home of appellant and asked permission to search his premises for whisky. At first this was granted, but when they found about half a tea cup of corn whisky in a five gallon jug appellant protested and ordered the search stopped. The sheriff remained on the premises while a deputy returned to town to get a search warrant. While the sheriff and some others were waiting for the search warrant, appellant agreed again that they make the search. This resulted in the finding of one and one-half gallons of red whisky covered with feed in a box near the hog pen. Later seven gallons were uncovered from some sand nearby. The search was continued and resulted in the finding of a large amount of mash, about a hundred gallons of which had been sweetened with sugar. A copper coil and other equipment, which a witness testified could be placed together and with it whisky produced, were discovered and such equipment was brought into the court room and exhibited to the jury.

Several bills of exception are lodged against the introduction of the coil and other equipment on the ground that it is a separate and distinct offense to possess such equipment, and that thereby appellant was being tried for an offense not charged in the complaint against him.

The question thus raised is fully discussed, with several authorities on the subject, in the case of Brown v. State, 120 Tex.Cr.R. 95, 47 S.W.2d 290. The holding in the Brown case is against the contention of appellant. We believe the law therein discussed is sound and it will be followed.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing, appellant urges the correctness of the matters originally presented.

*887We have again reviewed the entire record and remain convinced of the correctness of our original conclusion. It would serve no useful purpose to write further.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                            VASTAR RESOURCES, INC.
                              SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                            EXECUTIVE DEFERRAL PLAN


     Pursuant to the power of amendment reserved therein, Vastar Resources, Inc.
Amended and Restated Executive Deferral Plan, which was effective March 24,
1999, and amended by the First Amendment to such plan executed August 12, 1999,
is hereby amended effective May 24, 2000, as follows:

     1.   Section 2.5(b) is amended to replace the subsection with the
          following:

          "A Participant's Deferral Commitments shall not terminate upon a
     Change of Control triggered by the Merger.  Further, except as provided
     below, Deferral Commitments shall not terminate upon a Subsequent Change of
     Control.  If a Subsequent Change of Control occurs on or before June 30,
     2001, Deferral Commitments shall terminate as of June 30, 2001.
     Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Deferral Commitments relating to Awards
     and ESSP benefits which a Participant is or becomes entitled to on or prior
     to June 30, 2001, shall remain binding."

     Executed this 6th day of July, 2000.


                              VASTAR RESOURCES, INC.


                                   /s/  JEFFREY M. BENDER
ATTEST:                       By: ----------------------------------
                                    Jeffrey M. Bender
                                    Vice President, Human Resources
    /s/  ANTHONY S. NOONAN
By: -------------------------------
         Anthony S. Noonan
Name: -----------------------------
         General Tax Officer
Title: ----------------------------


Approved as to Form:

WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.

    /s/  PETER D. QUINN
By: ------------------------------
         Peter D. Quinn
Name: ----------------------------
         Senior Vice President
Title: ---------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 29, 2000, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Advanced Lead-Acid Battery Consortium (“ALABC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Advanced Transport Systems Ltd, Bristol, United Kingdom; Northstar Battery, LLC, Springfield, MO; and Korea Storage Battery, Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea have been added as parties to this venture.                 

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and ALABC intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On June 15, 1992 ALABC filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 29, 1992 (57 FR 33522).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 29, 2000. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on August 11, 2000 (65 FR 49260).                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-28175  Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT . 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

LUBBOCK DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

v. CASE NO. 5 :22-CR-028-H-BQ-1 

NICHOLAS AGUILAR 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA 

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

This case has been referred by the United States district judge to the undersigned 

for the taking of a guilty plea. The parties have consented to appear before a United States 

magistrate judge for these purposes. This Report and Recommendation on Plea is submitted 

to the court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). 

The defendant appeared with counsel before the undersigned United States 

magistrate judge, who addressed the defendant personally in open court and informed the 

defendant of, and determined that the defendant understood, the admonitions contained in 

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

The defendant pleaded guilty (under a written plea bargain agreement with the 

government) to Count One of the Indictment, charging defendant with a violation of 

18 US.C. §§ 922(g)(l), 924(a)(2), that is, Convicted Felon in Possession of a Firearm. 

After examining Defendant under oath the undersigned magistrate judge finds the 

following: 

1. Defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing 

to enter this guilty plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final 

approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge; 

Case 5:22-cr-00028-H-BV Document 25 Filed 09/12/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 44
,

   

2. Defendant fully understands the nature of the charges (including each 

essential element of the offense(s) charged) and penalties; 

3. Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea 

agreement supplement; 

4. Defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes 

to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right 

to appear before a United States district judge; 

5. Defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily; 

6. Defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty; 

7. There is a factual basis for this plea; and 

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of 

guilty. 

Although I have conducted these proceedings and recommend acceptance of 

Defendant's plea of guilty, the United States district judge has the power to review my 

actions and possesses final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if 

Defendant has any objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he 

is required to make those known to the United States district judge within fourteen (14) 

days of today. 

Based on the above, I recommend that Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted, that 

Defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. 

Signed September 12, 2022. 

YANT,JR. 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRA 

Case 5:22-cr-00028-H-BV Document 25 Filed 09/12/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 45
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 176 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 176

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas many States have encouraged and facilitated the creation of senior 
        citizen legislative and advocacy bodies;
Whereas in creating such bodies these States have provided many older Americans 
        the opportunity to express concerns, promote appropriate interests, and 
        advance the common good by influencing legislation and actions of State 
        government; and
Whereas a National Silver Haired Congress, with representatives from each State, 
        would provide a national forum for a nonpartisan evaluation of 
        grassroots solutions to concerns shared by an increasing number of older 
        Americans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress hereby recognizes and encourages the convening of an 
annual National Silver Haired Congress in the City of Washington, 
District of Columbia.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 1994.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.

  
  
  






103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 176

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 To recognize and encourage the convening of a National Silver Haired 
                               Congress.`
HeinOnline --- 42 Federal Register No. 215 page 58171 (1977)HeinOnline --- 42 Federal Register No. 215 page 58172 (1977)HeinOnline --- 42 Federal Register No. 215 page 58173 (1977)HeinOnline --- 42 Federal Register No. 215 page 58174 (1977)