June 30, 2015

Exemption No. 11954

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–1402

Mr. David Flores

Flying Solutions

17 Assisi Way

Missouri City, TX 77459

Dear Mr. Flores:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

By letter dated April 28, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Flying Solutions (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an exemption. The 

petitioner requested to operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct flight training1, 

education, real estate photography, videography, film and movie production, demonstration 

flights and inspections.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and 

the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner.

 

1 The petitioner also requested authority to conduct UAS training. At this time, the FAA is unable to authorize 

UAS operations for training until a further assessment is completed. When the FAA completes its review, we 

will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the petitioner. However, the petitioner is 

permitted to train its own pilot in commands and visual observers in accordance with condition no. 14 and the 

other conditions and limitations in this exemption.
2

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the DJI Phantom, DJI Inspire 1, and 3DR Solo.

In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112−95 in 

reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited 

operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation 

has determined that this aircraft meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA 

finds that relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, 

Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates, and any associated noise certification and testing 

requirements of part 36, is not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection2. The FAA has issued grants of 

exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. 

In Grants of Exemption Nos. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 

11109 to Clayco, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC (see

Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. (see Docket No. 

FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned 

aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or 

crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in 

addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled 

by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of 

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213;

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 

11213 also apply to the situation you present; and 

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, 

delegated to me by the Administrator, Flying Solutions is granted an exemption from 14 CFR 

 

2 Aerial data collection includes any remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard the UA. 

Examples include imagery (photography, video, infrared, etc.), electronic measurement (precision surveying, RF 

analysis, etc.), chemical measurement (particulate measurement, etc.), or any other gathering of data by 

instruments aboard the UA.
3

§§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 

91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the 

extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection. 

This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Flying Solutions is hereafter referred to as the operator.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Phantom, DJI 

Inspire 1, and 3DR Solo when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. 

Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to 

amend this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming are 

not permitted. 

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The 

exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine 

compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at 

airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the 

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level 

(AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. 

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than 

corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate or 

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within 

the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used 

to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS 

capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times; 

electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC 

must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the 

duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties 

required of the VO.
4

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its 

operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of 

exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating 

documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the 

Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and 

limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, 

the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. 

Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating 

documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the 

operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised 

documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The 

operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension 

or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update 

or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then 

the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s 

UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding 

updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation 

or flight characteristics, e.g., replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo 

a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. 

Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at 

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such 

a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is 

in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre-flight inspection and determine the 

UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre-flight inspection must account for all 

potential discrepancies, e.g., inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the 

inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is 

prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the 

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, 

replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and 

aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer 

safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, 

commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a 
5

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a 

state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal 

government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the 

ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be 

operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC 

qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with 

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs 

(training, proficiency, and experience-building) and determining the PIC’s ability to 

safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated 

under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, 

training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During 

training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for 

flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA 

with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All 

operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights 

under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as 

denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not 

denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current 

FAA-published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s 

management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption 

holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available 

to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a 

pre-determined location within the private or controlled-access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the 

intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve 

power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.
6

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All 

operations shall be conducted in accordance with an ATO-issued COA. The 

exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct 

operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA.

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification 

(N−Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must 

be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and 

any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the 

PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. 

These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement 

official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and 

activities at all times. 

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons 

from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure 

that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises 

where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of 

the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety 

of nonparticipating persons; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission 

for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of 

the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not 

present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered 

nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. 

Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be 

obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported 
7

to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be 

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions 

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and 

television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) 

as documented in this grant of exemption.

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this 

exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards 

District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the area of proposed filming. The 3-day 

notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities 

must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted 

under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on-scene operation of 

the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N−Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners 

and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those 

who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, 

town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes 

essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons 

consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the 

exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS 

operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, 

parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.
8

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosures
1 | Page – Flying Solutions Exemption Request

April 28, 2015

April 28, 2015

David Flores

Flying Solutions

17 Assisi Way

Missouri City, TX 77459

(281) 844-0722

david@flyingsolutions.net

Petition of Flying Solutions

For Exemption Pursuant to Section 333 

Of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and 14 CFR

Part 11, Flying Solutions, hereby applies for an exemption from Federal Aviation Regulations 

(FARs) identified below, to allow commercial operations of small unmanned aerial system (i.e., 

sUAS).

This exemption is in accordance with protocols outlined in this petition for exemption, and any 

other requirements established by the FAA pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act.

This exemption would permit commercial operation by Flying Solutions, which uses DJI 

Phantoms, Inspire 1, and 3DR Solos to conduct sUAS flight training, education, real estate 

photography, videography, film and movie production, demonstration flights and inspections. 

Flying Solutions’ operation under the exemption will be subject to strict operating requirements 

and conditions to ensure an equivalent level of safety to currently authorized operations using 

manned aircraft and under conditions as may be modified by the FAA as required by Section 

333.

Flying Solutions will be operated under controlled VFR conditions at low altitude in airspace 

that is permitted in accordance with Flying Solutions’ approved Certificate of Authorization 

(COA). They will operate the sUAS’s with pilots who have comprehensive UAV / UAS / Drone 

flight training for competency and new FAA 333 and Part 107 commercial compliance 

requirements. Finally, the FAA ATC will approve the airspace in which the sUAS will operate in 

advance.
2 | Page – Flying Solutions Exemption Request

April 28, 2015

Flying Solutions respectfully submits this request for an exemption because it operates sUAS's. 

The FAA can have confidence that the operations will be conducted at an equivalent level or 

greater level of safety. Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the 

Secretary of Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities under Section 333(c) of 

the Reform Act to “establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the 

national airspace system.”

For your convenience, Flying Solutions has organized this Exemption request as follows:

I. Petitioner's Description

II. Relevant Statutory Authority

III. Qualifications for Approval Under Section 333 of the Reform Act

IV. Description of Proposed Operations

V. Regulations From Which Exemption is Requested

VI. Public Interest

VII. Privacy

VIII. Federal Registry Summary

IX. Conclusion

I. Petitioner's Description:

Flying Solutions, headquartered in Missouri City, Texas, is a company that provides sUAS 

support to news services, real estate photography, film and movie production, education, 

demonstration flights and inspections in a compliant and safe environment. Flying Solutions

plan on providing a wide range of services as the sUAS market expands.

Flying Solutions' goal is to operate in an accident-free environment by:

• Demonstrating a commitment by management and all employee’s to operator in a 

compliant manner.

• Identify hazard and risk while eliminating or controlling all these risk.

• They will use steps to intervene and report when unsafe work practices appear to exist.

• Train all employees involved in flight operations to operate at the highest standard 

level.

The contact information for Petitioner is as follows:

Flying Solutions

17 Assisi Way

Missouri City, TX 77459

Member Managers:

David Flores
3 | Page – Flying Solutions Exemption Request

April 28, 2015

Office: (281) 844-0722

Email: david@flyingsolutions.net

II. Relevant Statutory Authority:

This petition for exemption is submitted to fulfill Congress' goal in passing Section 333(a) 

through (c) of the Reform Act. Congress has directed the FAA "to safely accelerate the 

integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system." Pursuant to 

Section 333 of the Reform Act, the FAA Administrator is to consider whether certain unmanned 

aircraft systems may operate safely in the National Airspace ("NAS") before completion of the 

formal UAS rulemaking, based on the following considerations:

• The UAS's size, weight, speed, and operational capability;

• Operation of the UAS in close proximity to airports and populated areas; and

• Operation of the UAS within the visual line of sight of the operator.

If the Secretary determines that such vehicles "may operate safely in the National Airspace 

System, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft in the 

National Airspace System".

Additionally, the FAA Administrator has general authority to grant exemptions from its safety 

regulations and minimum standards when the Administrator decides a requested exemption is 

in the public interest. A party requesting an exemption must explain the reasons why the 

exemption: (1) would benefit the public as a whole, and (2) would not adversely affect safety 

(or how it would provide a level of safety at least equal to the existing rules).

The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA the authority to issue exemptions. This 

statutory authority, by its terms, includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is defined under 

40101 of the Act, from the requirement that all civil aircraft must have a current airworthiness 

certificate and those regulations requiring commercial pilots to operate aircraft in commercial 

service:

The Administrator may grant an exemption from a requirement

of a regulation prescribed under subsection (a) or (b) of this 

section or any of sections.

III. Qualifications for Approval Under Section 333 of the Reform Act

The proposed operations in this petition for exemption qualify for expedited approval under 

Section 333 of the Reform Act. Each of the statutory criteria and other relevant factors are 

satisfied.

The proposed operations would permit Flying Solutions the use of small UAS under controlled 

conditions in airspace that is: (1) predetermined; (2) controlled as to access; and that (3) 
4 | Page – Flying Solutions Exemption Request

April 28, 2015

provides an increased level of safety beyond that existing when fixed or rotor wing aircraft are 

used to accomplish the same purpose.

Flying Solutions uses UASs that are multirotor, weighing less than 25 pounds including payload. 

They operate, under normal conditions, at speeds not to exceed 45 mph and have the 

capability to hover, and move in the vertical and horizontal plane. Flying Solutions’ UASs will 

operate in line of sight, during daylight hours, and will only operate within a sterile area. Flying 

Solutions will operate at or below 400 feet AGL and will file a NOTAM for each flight operated in 

controlled airspace. All required permissions and permits would be obtained from territorial, 

state, county or city jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fire, or other appropriate 

governmental agencies prior to operating a sUAS.

Given the small size of the sUAS’s involved and the restricted sterile environment within which 

they will operate, this Flying Solutions’ exemption falls within the zone of safety and 

demonstrate an equivalent level of safety, in which Congress desired the FAA to permit 

commercial UAS operations by exemption pending completion of formal rulemaking. Also, due 

to the size of the sUAS’s and the confined area in which the sUAS’s will operate, approval of the 

application presents no hazard in the NAS.

Considering the clear direction in Section 333 of the Reform Act, the authority contained in the 

Federal Aviation Act, as amended, the equivalent level of safety surrounding the proposed 

operations, and the significant public benefit, the grant of the requested exemptions is also in 

the public interest.

IV. Description of Proposed Operations

To assist the FAA in its safety assessment of Flying Solutions' proposed sUAS operations, below 

is a summary of operational limitations and conditions that will ensure an equivalent or higher 

level of safety to operations conducted under current regulatory guidelines:

1. The sUAS will weigh less than 25 pounds.

2. Flights will be operated within line of sight of the PIC and observer.

3. Maximum total flight time for each operational flight will be limited to the amount of 

time the sUAS can be flown and still maintain a reserve battery power of no less than 

25%.

4. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet AGL.

5. Flights will be operated at a lateral distance of least 100 feet from any inhabited 

structures, buildings, vehicles, vessels, people not associated with the operation or who 

have not signed a waiver in advance of the operation.

6. Minimum crew for each operation will consist of the sUAS Pilot in Command and a 

Visual Observer. Additional crewmembers consist of a Pilot and a Camera Operator.
5 | Page – Flying Solutions Exemption Request

April 28, 2015

7. The sUAS Pilot in Command will have undergone comprehensive UAV / UAS / Drone 

flight training for competency and new FAA 333 and Part 107 commercial compliance 

requirements.

8. Flying Solutions will designate a Pilot in Command ("PIC") for each mission.

9. The sUAS will operate only within a confined "Sterile Area".

10. Prior to the operations at a particular location, a site inspection will have been 

conducted. On the day of the mission the management person with operational control 

and the PIC will concur on dispatching of the mission.

11. A briefing will be conducted in regard to the planned sUAS operations prior to each 

day's missions. It will be mandatory that all personnel who will be performing duties 

within the boundaries of the sterile area be present for this briefing.

12. Flying Solutions crew will use the checklist and callouts required in the Operations 

Manual.

13. All sUAS’s will be maintained in accordance with inspection program specified in the 

manufacturer’s guidelines.

14. In the event of an accident involving an Flying Solutions sUAS, they will cease operations 

and report the accident to the NTSB and AFS-80.

15. Pilot in Command and Visual Observer will at all times be able to communicate by voice.

16. Pilot in Command, Pilot, Camera Operator, Visual Observer, and Operational Personnel 

will have been trained and tested in accordance to FAA, NTSB, and AFS-80 best 

practices.

17. All required permissions and permits would be obtained from territorial, state, county 

or city jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fire or other appropriate 

governmental agencies.

18. Flying Solutions management will submit a written “Plan of Activities” to the local Flight 

Standards District Office (FSDO) having jurisdiction over the area of proposed filming 

three days in advanced of operations during film or movie productions.

19. If the sUAS loses communications signal, the sUAS will have the capability to return to a 

pre-determined location within the Sterile Area and land.

20. Contingency plans will be in place to safely terminate flight if there is a loss of 

communication between the pilot and the observer.

21. The sUAS has the capability to abort a flight in case of unpredicted obstacles or 

emergencies.

22. Flying Solutions, by following FAA, NTSB, and AFS-80 best practices, will assure no 

individuals’ privacy is violated.

23. Procedures have been established in Flying Solutions’ Operations Manual to contact ATC 

prior to operating in airspace other than G.

V. Regulations From Which Exemption is Requested

A. 14 CFR § 91.103: Preflight Action
6 | Page – Flying Solutions Exemption Request

April 28, 2015

B. 14 CFR § 91.113: Right-of-Way Rules

C. 14 CFR § 91.119 (c): Minimum Safe Altitudes

D. 14 CFR § 91.121: Altimeter Settings

E. 14 CFR § 91.151(b): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions

F. 14 CFR § 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2); 91.417(a) and (b):

Maintenance Inspections

A. 14 CFR § 91.103: Preflight Action

Flying Solutions requests an exemption from the preflight actions requirements of 14 CFR 

91.113 that prescribes the preflight actions under which aircraft may operate:

Each pilot in command shall, before beginning a flight, become familiar with all available 

information concerning that flight.

a. Flight under IFR or a flight not in the vicinity of an airport, weather 

reports and forecasts, fuel requirements, alternatives available if the 

planned flight cannot be completed, and any known traffic delays of

which the pilot in command has been advised by ATC;

b. For any flight, runway lengths at airports of intended use, and the 

following takeoff and landing distance information:

i. For civil aircraft for which an approved Airplane or Rotorcraft 

Flight Manual containing takeoff and landing distance data is 

required, the takeoff and landing distance data contained therein; 

and

ii. For civil aircraft other than those specified in paragraph (b)(1) of 

this section, other reliable information appropriate to the aircraft, 

relating to aircraft performance under expected values of airport 

elevation and runway slope, aircraft gross weight, and wind and 

temperature.

Flying Solutions will not operate sUAS’s under IFR conditions or when the ceilings are below 

1000 feet and the visibility is below 3 statute miles. DJI’s sUAS’s do not have published 

approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual containing takeoff and landing distance data.

Equivalent Level of Safety

In adherence to FAA, NTSB, and AFS-80 best practices, the PIC along with the person having 

operational control must follow to assure that the weather will be adequate to complete the 

mission in VFR condition. Since Flying Solutions operates in Texas where the density altitude is 

never usually above 2000 feet, UAS performance is not affected. When Flying Solutions is 

allowed to operate in other parts of the United States the UAS used in those locations will be 
7 | Page – Flying Solutions Exemption Request

April 28, 2015

test flown at gross weight to test performance limitations prior to conducting commercial 

operations.

B. 14 CFR 91.113: Right-of-Way Rules

Flying Solutions request an exemption from 14 CFR 91.113 Right-of-way rules, requiring 

vigilance by each person operating an aircraft so as to see and avoid other aircraft. When a rule 

of this section gives another aircraft the right-of-way, the pilot shall give way to that aircraft 

and may not pass over, under, or ahead of it unless well clear. 

Flying Solutions operates small pilotless UAS’s and cannot comply with these rules as they have 

been written.

Equivalent Level of Safety

Flying Solutions operates sUAS’s at or below an altitude of 400 feet AGL, well below the normal 

operating altitude of other aircraft. Flying Solutions management require that a Pilot in 

Command with experience will oversee each mission and has knowledge of the avoid rules. A 

Visual Observer will assist the PIC in looking for aircraft entering the operations area. It’s the 

responsibility of the PIC to cease operations and land the UAS immediately whenever and 

aircraft comes into the vicinity creating a potential threat. Operations cannot recommence until 

the threat is clear.

C. 14 CFR. § 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes

Flying Solutions requests an exemption from the minimum safe altitude requirements of 14 CFR 

91.119 that prescribes the minimum safe altitudes under which aircraft may operate:

• Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any open air assembly of 

persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius 

of 2,000 feet of the aircraft.

• Over other than congested areas at an altitude of 500 feet above the surface, except 

over open water or sparsely populated areas. In those cases, the aircraft may not be 

operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure.

Section 91.119 (d) allows for a helicopter to operate at less than those minimum altitudes when 

it can be operated "without hazard to persons or property on the surface," provided that "each 

person operating the helicopter complies with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for 

helicopters by the FAA."

To provide the intended operations, the sUAS is normally operated below 400 feet AGL. 

Additionally, due to the nature of the proposed operations, the sUAS will maintain a lateral 
8 | Page – Flying Solutions Exemption Request

April 28, 2015

distance of at least 100 feet from inhabited structures, buildings, vehicles, and vessels, and 

from people not associated with the operation.

Equivalent Level of Safety

Compared to flight normal aircraft, Flying Solutions’ multi-rotor aircraft weigh a maximum of 25 

pounds, and given the lack of flammable fuel, any risk associated with these operations is far 

less than those that presently exist with conventional aircraft. An equivalent level of safety will 

be achieved given the size, weight, and speed of the UAS, as well as the location where it is 

operated. As set forth in the FAA, NTSB, and AFS-80 best practices, the sUAS will be operated in 

a sterile area, where buildings and people will not be exposed to operations without their preobtained consent. Because of the advance notice to the property owners and participants, all 

affected individuals will be well aware of the planned flight operations prior to commencement 

of operations.

Furthermore, by operating at such lower altitudes, the sUAS will not interfere with aircraft that 

are subject to the minimum safe altitude regulations. Finally, the successful safety record of the 

DJI sUAS’s demonstrates that the sUAS can be safely used at these lower altitudes and closer 

operating environments.

D. 14 C.F.R. § 91.121: Altimeter Settings

Flying Solutions seeks an exemption from 14 CFR 91.121, which requires a person operating an 

aircraft to maintain cruising altitude or flight level by reference to an altimeter that is set to the 

elevation of the departure airport or barometric pressure. An exemption is required because 

the sUAS does not have a barometric altimeter, but rather a GPS altitude read out.

Equivalent Level of Safety

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by following the procedures set forth in the FAA, 

NTSB, and AFS-80 best practices. Flying Solutions will confirm the altitude of the launch site 

shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight. Moreover, the PIC will use the GPS altitude 

indicator to constantly monitor the sUAS's height, thus ensuring operation at safe altitudes.

E. 14 CFR 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions

Flying Solutions requests an exemption from 14 CFR § 91.151(a)'s fuel requirements for flight in 

VFR conditions. Section 91.151 states:

a. No person may begin a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless 

(considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to 

the first point of intended landing, and assuming normal cruising speed –

i. During the day, to fly after that for at least 25 minutes; or
9 | Page – Flying Solutions Exemption Request

April 28, 2015

ii. At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes.

The batteries powering Flying Solutions’ UAS’s provide approximately 10-25 minutes of 

powered flight. To meet the 30 minutes reserve requirement in 14 CFR 91.151, sUAS flights 

could not be conducted. Given the limitations on the sUAS's proposed flight area and the 

location of its proposed operations within a predetermined area, a safety margin based on a 

reserve amount of battery life is needed. Flying Solutions will not be conducting any sUAS 

flights at night.

Equivalent Level of Safety

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because the operations will be conducted on-site 

without significant transit time by the sUAS. All flights will be planned to terminate with no less 

than 25% reserve battery power still available. This restriction would be more than adequate to 

return the sUAS safely to its planned landing zone from anywhere in its confined area of 

operation even in the event of an unexpected occurrence. Operation of the sUAS with less than 

30 minutes of reserve fuel does not include the type of risks that Section 91.151(a) was 

intended to alleviate given the size and speed of the small UAS, and the proximity of the flight 

operation to the landing zone. Moreover, operation will be limited to controlled areas where 

only people and property owners, or official representatives who have signed waivers will be 

allowed.

F. 14 CFR § 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2); 91.417(a) and (b): Maintenance 

Inspections

Flying Solutions also seeks an exemption from the maintenance inspection requirements 

contained in 14 CFR 91.405(a), 91.407(a) (1), 91.409(a) (2), 91.417(a) and (b). These regulations 

specify maintenance and inspection standards in reference to 14 CFR Part 43. 14 CFR 91.405(a) 

(stating that each owner or operator of an aircraft "shall have the aircraft inspected as 

prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections ...have discrepancies 

repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter"). An exemption to these regulations is needed 

because Part 43 and these sections only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, 

which the sUAS will not have.

Equivalent Level of Safety

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because maintenance and inspections will be 

performed in accordance with FAA, NTSB, and AFS-80 best practices. The operator will ensure 

that the sUAS is in working order prior to initiating flight, perform required maintenance, and 

keep a log of any maintenance performed. The operator is the person most familiar with the 

aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to provide the 

equivalent level of safety.
10 | Page – Flying Solutions Exemption Request

April 28, 2015

If mechanical issues arise, the sUAS's size and carrying capacity, and the fact that flight 

operations will only take place in restricted areas for limited periods of time during daylight 

hours, creates less risk than that associated with conventional rotorcraft performing the same 

operation.

VI. PUBLIC INTEREST

Granting Flying Solutions an exemption furthers the public interest. National policy set by 

Congress favors early integration of UAS into the national airspace in controlled, safe working 

environments such as those propose in this petition. The one vision of Flying Solutions is to help 

facilitate safe integration of sUAS’s into mainstream USA in the following areas:

• Movies and Videography

o Whether the shot requires unique views and expansive panning or extreme 

altitude with radical views, the UAS is designed to hold up under demanding 

conditions. Because of the autopilot feature with pre-designed mission 

management and R/C control interrupt, the pilot and camera operator can easily 

create the ultimate shot with HD video or HD still photos. When working close in 

on a closed set the hazards to the actors are greatly reduced due to the size of 

the sUAS.

• News Gathering

o Similar to movies and videography, each news assignment may require a 

completely different shot or view of a scene. With budgets for traditional 

helicopter use being greatly reduced, the UAS is the perfect solution to allow for 

easy news gathering for a fraction of the cost. The sUAS can and will be operated 

in a sterile area away from the public, while the traditional helicopter must 

hover over persons and property increasing the danger to individuals.

• Real Estate

o The sUAS can be used in all areas of real estate, including commercial, residential 

and industrial properties. Using a sUAS, real estate professionals can create 

promotional videos, photos and unique shots that normal camera aspects 

cannot capture. Flying Solutions’ easy-to-use video and photo platform enables 

properties to stand out, providing dazzling views that are typically shown via 

expensive computer animation or costly helicopter rentals. Imagine shooting a 

view from a high-rise condo in stunning high definition that shows your potential 

customer the actual view from the residence. The remote platform is great for 

new planning, zoning and large developments. Simple and easy-to-use video and

photos allow for multiple height pictures and elevation views.

VII. Privacy

Flying Solutions is deeply committed to protecting public privacy. Flying Solutions knows that 

many individual have concerns about privacy from the operations of sUAS’s. Flying Solutions
11 | Page – Flying Solutions Exemption Request

April 28, 2015

has created a privacy notice that informs residents, commercial property owners, churches, 

schools, and governmental organizations of our intent to conduct commercial drone operations

in proximity to their property.

VIII. Federal Registry Summary

Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the Federal 

Register, should it be determined that publication is needed:

Flying Solutions seeks an exemption from the following rules:

14 CFR § 91.103; 14 CFR § 91.113; 14 CFR § 91.119 (c); 14 CFR § 91.121; 14 CFR § 91.151(b); 14 

CFR § 91.405(a), 91.407(a) (1), 91.409(a) (2); 91.417(a) and (b).

Approval of this exemption request allows Flying Solutions to conduct commercial operations 

with small and lightweight unmanned aerial systems. Flying Solutions’ singular vision is to 

enhance safety of sUAS operations in the NAS while reducing risk to the general public and 

property owners.

The DJI sUAS, weighing less than 25 pounds and powered by batteries, eliminates virtually all of 

that risk given the reduced mass and lack of combustible fuel carried on board. The sUAS is 

transported to the designated mission area and set up there. The sUAS will carry no passengers 

or crew and, therefore, will not expose them to the risks associated with manned aircraft 

flights.

The operation of this small UAS will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant 

of the exemptions requested herein, including exempting the applicant from the requirements 

of several regulations and allowing commercial operations. These lightweight sUAS’s operate at 

slow speeds, close to the ground, and in a sterile environment. As a result, they are far safer 

than conventional aerial survey and inspection operations conducted with fixed wing aircraft or 

helicopters.

If additional information is required, or if you have any questions regarding this Petition for 

Exemption, please contact the undersigned at:

With Best Regards,

David Flores, Director

Flying Solutions

Office: (281) 844-0722

Email: david@flyingsolutions.net
12 | Page – Flying Solutions Exemption Request

April 28, 2015

IX. Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, it is requested that the regulatory exemptions requested herein be

respectfully granted, and the Petitioner be permitted to conduct small UAS operations 

aforementioned purposes.