alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KAOSAR ALAM,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-70619

Agency No. A089-885-263

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 17, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Kaosar Alam, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

FILED

JUL 23 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-70619

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual

findings, applying the new standards governing adverse credibility determinations

created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir.

2010), and we deny the petition for review. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on the inconsistencies between Alam’s testimony and his declaration and

documentary evidence regarding the timing of an attack on his business. See id. at

1046-47; see also Goel v. Gonzales, 490 F.3d 735, 739 (9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam)

(discrepancies between testimony and documentary evidence are a proper basis for

an adverse credibility finding). The agency reasonably rejected Alam’s

explanation for the inconsistencies. See Rivera v. Mukasey, 508 F.3d 1271, 1275

(9th Cir. 2007). In the absence of credible testimony, Alam’s asylum and

withholding claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.

2003). 

Because Alam’s CAT claim is based on the same evidence the agency found

not credible, and he points to no other evidence in the record to show it is more

likely than not that he would be tortured in Bangladesh, his CAT claim fails. See

id. at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Stratus Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge:
 
 (1) This
Report on Form 10-K for the ear ended December 31, 2008 (“Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  April
      17, 2009/s/
      John MoynahanName:    John
      MoynahanTitle:     Acting
      Chief Financial Officer
 
 The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Gainesville Area 

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE n '=/Vi" Ql300 E Univorsily AvG., Suite 100 

PO 80x1187 

Gainesville FL 32602 

(352)334-7100 

Fax:(352)334-7141 

www.GainesvilIeChamber.com 

August 17,2010 

Alolia Ley 

Associate Director 

Small Coinimuiity Air Service Development Progiam (SCASDP) 

nlohn.lCYtajtiot.gov 

Re: Small Coiiimunlt}' Air Service Developutent Grant 

Dear Ms. Ley, 

On behalf of the GaiiicKville Area Chamber of Commerce and our economic development team, 

thcCouncil for Economic Outreach, 1 fully support Gainesville Regional Airport's request for a Small 

Community Air Service Development grant to assist with marketing the new American Eagle Airlines 

service between Gainesville and Miami and the existing, local air canriefs, Delta Air Lines and US 

Ainvays. American's new service wilt allow the business connnunity to be more productive, ultimately 

improving efficiency and saving money. 

Many businesses choose to locale in Gainesville due to a stable economic cnvironn)ent and outstanding 

quality of life. Our members have expressed a need for air service to South Florida. The level of air 

seivice has been an ongoing matter of concern and could not suppoit (he continued increase in demand. 

In addition to convenient access to south Florida, American's extensive domestic and international route 

structure from the Miami hub will provide new travel options and a greater level of frequency for both 

business and leisure travelers. 

A growing number of information technology, biotechnology and professional engineeiing service finns 

have located in Gainesville and will require a greater level of air service to conduct business. Due to the 

critical importance of quality air service for our region and our members, we arc committed to suppoiling 

American's new service and paiincrlng with the aitport to (xmlinuc improvements in air service. 

Again, I urge you to proceed with approving the Airpoil Authority's request for a giant to assist with 

marketing effoils for the next two years. If you have any questions about our travel needs, please don't 

hesitate to contact me. 

Sincerely, 

Brent Christensen 

President and CEO 

ACCREDITED 

In 2009, the Gainesville Area Chamber of Commerce was awarded 5-Star 

Accreditation from the U.S. Chamber of Gommerce, an honor recognizing It as 

^ being among the top 1% of chambers nationwide. 

Page 57
1

The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-2742

___________

Janet Elizabeth Moore, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Western District of Missouri.

*

Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, *

also known as Wal-Mart, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: November 26, 2010

Filed: December 2, 2010

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Janet Moore appeals the District Court’s1

 adverse grant of summary judgment

in her employment-discrimination action against Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. After

careful de novo review, see Murphy v. Mo. Dep’t of Corr., 372 F.3d 979, 982 (8th Cir.

2004), we affirm for the reasons explained by the District Court in its thorough

opinion. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the District Court. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.
#### Ex parte JONES.

No. 22354.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 4, 1942.

J. H. Synnott, of Jasper, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is an application for permission to file, in this court, an original petition for the writ of habeas corpus by which relator seeks to be discharged from the custody of the Sheriff of Jasper County, Texas. The petition so desired to be filed accompanies the application.

It appears that, on the 22nd day of August, 1942, relator was, upon his waiver of trial by jury and plea of guilty, duly convicted, by the Judge of the District Court of Jasper County, Texas, of the offense of felony theft, the punishment assessed being confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of four years. Sentence was, on the same day, duly passed, from which no notice of appeal was given. Relator’s confinement is by virtue of said judgment and sentence.

Relator contends that the judgment is void because he was not represented by counsel, nor was an attorney appointed to represent him, before the trial by jury was waived and the plea of guilty entered, as required by the provisions of Art. 10a, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., the applicable part of which reads as follows:

> “Provided, that before a defendant who has no Attorney can agree to waive a Jury, the Court must appoint an Attorney to represent him.”

To support his contention that he had no attorney and that none was appointed for him, relator relies alone upon allegations to that effect contained in his petition for the writ of habeas corpus, which is sworn to by him.

The judgment complained of contains the following recital: “ * * * and the defendant Lee Jones appeared in person, his counsel also being present, and both parties announced ready for trial,” etc.

Other statutory prerequisites to a valid judgment are set forth therein, and, upon *455its face, the judgment complained of is entirely valid.

The presumption is that the recitals in the judgment are true. 12 Tex.Jur., p. 731, § 363; Ex parte Sparks, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 190, 234 S.W. 393.

Relator’s sworn petition is insufficient to overcome the presumption mentioned. Branch’s Ann.Tex.P.C., § 237; Ex narte Bowers, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 273, 98 S.W. 2d 191.

If facts exist which sustain relator’s attack on the judgment, these should ibe established in a forum having jurisdiction, opportunity and facilities to determine fact questions. This court has repeatedly refused to resolve itself into a fact-finding body when the relief sought can be had in some other forum.

The application for permission to file the petition for the writ of habeas corpus is denied without prejudice.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ORBIT
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              26
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    26
<PP&E>                                             335
<DEPRECIATION>                                     300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,657
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           329
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,853)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       133
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     7
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (236)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (236)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (236)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
H. Con. Res. 160 Agreed to October 18, 1993

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concur- ring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3123, to improve

the electric and telephone loan programs carried out under the

Rural Electrification Act of 1936, and for other purposes, the Clerk

of the House shall make the following correction:

On page 4, line 16, of the House engrossed bill, strike

‘‘urban’’ and insert ‘‘urbanized’’.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 65867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28108]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel Cooperative Multicenter Neonatal 
Research Network.
    Date: December 6-7, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Ramada Inn, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Gopal M. Bhatnagar, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health, and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 
PHS, DHHS, 9000 Rockville Pike, 6100 Bldg., Room 5E01, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 496-1485.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: October 25, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-28108 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Amended Annual Report of Entrust Financial Services, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2001 as
filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report). I, David Hite, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 USC § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ David Hite
David Hite, Chief Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------

Dated:
08/19/02
084-O

Case 4:22-cr-00084-O Document 13 Filed 03/14/22 Page 1 of 6 PageID 16
Case 4:22-cr-00084-O Document 13 Filed 03/14/22 Page 2 of 6 PageID 17
Case 4:22-cr-00084-O Document 13 Filed 03/14/22 Page 3 of 6 PageID 18
Case 4:22-cr-00084-O Document 13 Filed 03/14/22 Page 4 of 6 PageID 19
Case 4:22-cr-00084-O Document 13 Filed 03/14/22 Page 5 of 6 PageID 20
Case 4:22-cr-00084-O Document 13 Filed 03/14/22 Page 6 of 6 PageID 21
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 19 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 19

  Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding terms of office for 
                        Members of the Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 1993

   Mr. Goss submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
     referred jointly to the Committees on the Judiciary and House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding terms of office for 
                        Members of the Congress.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the terms of office for Members of the House of 
        Representatives should be increased from 2 years to 4 years;
            (2) elections for Representatives should be held when the 
        election for the President is held;
            (3) Representatives should be limited to 3 consecutive 
        terms of office, but should be eligible for reelection after an 
        absence from the House of Representatives of at least 4 
        consecutive years; and
            (4) Senators should be limited to 2 consecutive terms of 
        office, but should be eligible for reelection after an absence 
        from the Senate of at least 4 consecutive years.

                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RENETTE BAPTISTE

- FAUSTI

, Appellant,

v.

HOMEOWNERS CHOICE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE

COMPANY, INC.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 992

[ April 4, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Joseph Marx , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502016CA013639XXXXMB

.

Melissa A. Giasi of Giasi Law, P.A. , Tampa, for appellant.

Celeste B. Marcks of Groelle & Salmon, P.A., West Palm Beach, for

appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

A

ffirmed.

M AY

, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

###### [Investigation Nos. 731-TA-474 and 475 (Review)] 

## Determinations 

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in these subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on chrome-plated lug nuts from China and Taiwan would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the                           ( print page 66559)                        United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                 

## Background 

                    The Commission instituted these reviews on August 2, 1999 (64 FR 41949) and determined on March 22, 2000, that it would conduct full reviews (65 FR 16632, March 29, 2000). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 14, 2000 (65 FR 37408). The hearing, originally scheduled for August 31, 2000, was canceled due to lack of interest by the parties.                 

The Commission transmitted its determinations in these investigations to the Secretary of Commerce on October 25, 2000. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3362 (October 2000), entitled Chrome-Plated Lug Nuts from China and Taiwan: Investigations Nos. 731-TA-474 and 475 (Review). 

Issued: October 31, 2000.

By order of the Commission. 

Donna R. Koehnke, 

Secretary. 

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-28394 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P