Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Proposed Rules 67319

‘‘Section 1.679–6 Outbound Migrations

of Domestic Trusts’’, last paragraph in

the column, last line, the language

‘‘November 6, 2000’’ is corrected to read

‘‘August 7, 2000’’.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,

Chief, Regulations Unit, Office of Special

Counsel (Modernization and Strategic

Planning).

[FR Doc. 00–28424 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[MD107–3059, VA122 &123–5054; FRL–

6899–2]

Approval and Promulgation of Air

Quality Implementation Plans;

Maryland and Virginia; Metropolitan

Washington, D.C. Ozone

Nonattainment Area; Extension of

Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of the

comment period.

SUMMARY: EPA is extending the

comment period for a series of proposed

rulemaking actions published on

October 19, 2000. On this date, EPA

proposed action on the following

Maryland and Virginia provisions as

revisions to their respective State

Implementation Plans (SIP’s):

Maryland—New Source Review (65 FR

62675); and Virginia—Source-Specific

Permits to Reduce NOX Emissions in the

Metropolitan Washington, D.C. Ozone

Nonattainment Area (65 FR 62666).

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before November 20, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to

Makeba Morris, Chief, Permits and

Technical Assessment Branch, Mailcode

3AP11, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

1. Maryland—New Source Review:

Perry R. Pandya, U.S. EPA Region III,

(215) 814–2167.

2. Virginia—Source-Specific Permits

to Reduce NOX emissions in the

Metropolitan Washington, D.C. Ozone

Nonattainment Area: Michael Ioff, U.S.

EPA Region III, (215) 814–2166.

Dated: October 31, 2000.

Bradley M. Campbell,

Regional Administrator, Region III.

[FR Doc. 00–28705 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[DC048–2022, MD096–3053, MD104–3057,

MD106–3058, MD058–3036 & VA083–5038;

FRL–6899–1]

Approval and Promulgation of Air

Quality Implementation Plans; District

of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia;

Metropolitan Washington D.C. Ozone

Nonattainment Area; Extension of

Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of the

comment period.

SUMMARY: EPA is extending the

comment period for a series of proposed

rulemaking actions published on

October 19, 2000. On this date, EPA

proposed action on the following

District of Columbia, Maryland, and

Virginia provisions as revisions to their

respective State Implementation Plans

(SIP’s): District of Columbia—Nitrogen

Oxides Budget Program (65 FR 62679);

Maryland—Nitrogen Oxides Budget

Program (65 FR 62677), Nitrogen Oxides

Reduction and Trading Program (65 FR

62671), and Reasonably Available

Control Technology for Oxides of

Nitrogen (65 FR 62668); and Maryland

and Virginia—Post-1996 Rate of

Progress Plan for the Metropolitan

Washington, D.C. Ozone Nonattainment

Area (65 FR 62658).

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before November 20, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to

David L. Arnold, Chief, Ozone and

Mobile Sources Branch, Mailcode

3AP21, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

1. District of Columbia—Nitrogen

Oxides Budget Program; Maryland—

Nitrogen Oxides Budget Program, and

Maryland—Nitrogen Oxides Reduction

and Trading Program: Cristina

Fernandez, U.S. EPA Region III, (215)

814–2178.

2. Maryland—Reasonably Available

Control Technology for Oxides of

Nitrogen: Kelly Bunker, U.S. EPA

Region III, (215) 814–2177.

3. Maryland and Virginia—Post-1996

Rate of Progress Plan for the

Metropolitan Washington, D.C. Ozone

Nonattainment Area: Janice Lewis, U.S.

EPA Region III, (215) 814–2185, or

Christopher Cripps at (215) 814–2179.

Dated: October 31, 2000.

Bradley M. Campbell,

Regional Administrator, Region III.

[FR Doc. 00–28706 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[FRL–6899–4]

Supplemental Information To Support

Proposed Approvals of One-Hour

Ozone Attainment Demonstrations for

Serious Ozone Nonattainment Areas;

Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability and

extension of comment period;

correction.

SUMMARY: On November 2, 2000 (65 FR

65818), EPA published a notice of

availability and reopening of comment

period to provide the public with the

opportunity to comment on a reasonably

available control measures (RACM)

analysis that EPA performed. In that

document EPA stated that the comment

period would be extended 15 additional

days, but in the Dates Section there was

a typographical error that stated that the

comment period would close on

November 15, 2001. The EPA’s original

intent was to extend the comment

period 15 additional days, therefore the

comment period is only being extended

to November 15, 2000.

Dated: November 3, 2000.

Henry C. Thomas,

Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning

and Standards.

DATES: The comment period closes on

November 15, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John

Silvasi at (919) 541–5666.

[FR Doc. 00–28810 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[FRL–6898–1]

National Oil and Hazardous

Substances Pollution Contingency

Plan, National Priorities List

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed direct final deletion of

the Ilada Energy Company Superfund

67320 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 218 / Thursday, November 9, 2000 / Proposed Rules

Site (Site) from the National Priorities

List (NPL).

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to delete

the Ilada Energy Company Superfund

site (Site) from the NPL and requests

public comment on this action. The NPL

constitutes appendix B to 40 CFR part

300 of the National Oil and Hazardous

Substances Pollution Contingency Plan

(NCP), which EPA promulgated

pursuant to section 105 of the

Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation, and Liability

Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended. EPA

has determined that the Site currently

poses no significant threat to public

health or the environment, as defined by

CERCLA, and therefore, further

remedial measures under CERCLA are

not appropriate. We are publishing this

proposed rule without prior notification

because the Agency views this as a

noncontroversial revision and

anticipates no dissenting comments. A

detailed rationale for this proposal is set

forth in the direct final rule, published

elsewhere in this issue of the Federal

Register. If no dissenting comments are

received, the deletion will become

effective. If EPA receives dissenting

comments, the direct final action will be

withdrawn and all public comments

received will be addressed in a

subsequent final rule based on this

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a

second comment period. Any parties

interested in commenting should do so

at this time.

DATES: Comments concerning this

Action must be received by December

11, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to

Gladys Beard, Associate Remedial

Project Manager, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (SR–6J), 77 W.

Jackson, Chicago, IL 60604.

Comprehensive information on this Site

is available through the public docket

which is available for viewing at the

Site Information Repositories at the

following locations: U.S. EPA Region 5,

Administrative Records, 77 W. Jackson

Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604 (312) 886–

0900, the Cape Giradeau Public Library,

711 N. Clark, Cape Girardeau, MO

63701 and the Illinois Environmental

Protection Agency, 1021 North Grand

Ave. East, Springfield, Illinois 62794.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon

Peterson, Remedial Project Manager at

(312) 353–1264 or Gladys Beard

Associate Remedial Project Manager, at

(312) 886–7253. Written correspondence

can be directed to Ms. Beard at U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, (SR–

6J) 77 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL

60604.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For

additional information, see the Direct

Final Action which is located in the

Rules section of this Federal Register.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 9601–9657; 33 U.S.C.

1321 (c) (2); E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,

1991 Comp.; p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923,

3 CFR, 1987 Comp.; p. 193.

Dated: October 27, 2000.

Gary Gulezian,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region V.

[FR Doc. 00–28515 Filed 11–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 36

[CC Docket No. 80–286; DA 00–2433]

Comment Sought on Recommended

Decision Issued by Federal-State Joint

Board on Jurisdictional Separations

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rules; solicitation of

comments.

SUMMARY: This document seeks

comment on the Federal-State Joint

Board on Jurisdictional Separations’

Recommended Decision for instituting

an interim freeze of the relationships

and jurisdictional allocation factors.

DATES: Submit comments on or before

November 24, 2000, and reply

comments on or before December 4,

2000.

ADDRESSES: See Supplementary

Information section for where and how

to file comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William Cox, (202) 418–7400; TTY:

(202) 418–0484.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The full

text of this document is available for

public inspection and copying during

regular business hours at the FCC

Reference Information Center, Portals II,

445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–A257,

Washington, DC, 20554. This document

may also be purchased from the

Commission’s copy contractor,

International Transcription Service, Inc.

(ITS), 1231 20th Street, NW.,

Washington, DC 20036, telephone 202–

857–3800, facsimile 202–857–3805.

On July 21, 2000, the Federal-State

Joint Board on Jurisdictional

Separations (Joint Board) released a

Recommended Decision for instituting

an interim freeze of the part 36 category

relationships and jurisdictional

allocation factors. On August 15, 2000,

we released a public notice, similar to

this Public Notice, that sought comment

on the Recommended Decision. The

Aug. 15 Public Notice inadvertently was

not published in the Federal Register.

In order to provide adequate notice to

interested parties, we now release this

Public Notice seeking comment on the

Recommended Decision. Parties who

have already filed comments in

response to the Aug. 15 Public Notice

need not refile their comments.

The Joint Board recommended that

the Commission institute a five-year

freeze of all part 36 category

relationships and allocation factors for

price cap carriers, and a freeze of the

allocation factors for rate-of-return

carriers. The Joint Board recommended

that the Commission adopt a freeze

based on carriers’ data from the twelve

months prior to the Commission’s

issuance of an order on the

Recommended Decision. The Joint

Board further recommended that the

freeze should be mandatory and apply

to all carriers subject to the

Commission’s part 36 rules. The Joint

Board recommended that the freeze

remain in effect for five years, or until

the Commission takes further action

pursuant to a recommendation from the

Joint Board, whichever occurs first.

During the interim freeze period, the

Joint Board recommended that the Joint

Board and the Commission continue to

review issues regarding separations

reform, as specified in the

Recommended Decision. We seek

comment on the Joint Board’s

recommendations.

The Joint Board also recommended

that the Commission further develop the

record in this proceeding on the impact

of increased intrastate usage on

jurisdictional allocations and consumers

since 1995. Accordingly, we seek

comment on the impact of increased

intrastate usage since 1995 on

jurisdictional allocations and

consumers. The Joint Board noted that

one possible explanation for the

increase in intrastate usage is the growth

in the use of the local network to

connect to the Internet since 1995. As a

result, we seek comment on the impact

of Internet traffic growth on

jurisdictional allocations since 1995. We

request that companies provide specific

information on Internet usage minutes,

including the percentage of local

minutes and total minutes that represent

Internet traffic. This usage information

should include data from Internet

service providers both affiliated and

non-affiliated with incumbent local

exchange carriers. If estimates are used

in determining these statistics, we

request that commenters provide

detailed explanation and justification