alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 1

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Office of Personnel Management should provide certain vocational rehabilitation services in its administration of the civil service disability retirement program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mrs. COLLINS of Illinois submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Office of

Personnel Management should provide certain vocational

rehabilitation services in its administration of the civil

service disability retirement program.

Whereas individuals under the civil service disability retirement program should have the option of resuming useful

employment after their careers are interrupted by severe

injury;

Whereas vocational rehabilitation methods, such as selective

job referral, retraining, and career counseling, have progressed to the point where they represent cost-effective,

as well as humane, alternatives to continued dependence

on disability benefits;
2

HCON 1 IH

Whereas the former Federal policy favoring the rehiring of

injured employees has been curtailed because of recent

hiring ceilings; and

Whereas vocational rehabilitation is used throughout the insurance industry as well as under Federal workmen’s

compensation law, and should be a part of the Office of

Personnel Management’s functions in administering the

civil service disability retirement program: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 Office of Personnel Management should identify those in4 dividuals under the disability retirement provisions of title

5 5, United States Code, who could benefit from vocational

6 rehabilitation and should advise such annuitants of the

7 various vocational rehabilitation programs available to

8 them, including those administered by the United States

9 Employment Service and State vocational education divi10 sions.

Æ
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 109 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 109

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress respecting the 80th anniversary of 
                      the Anti-Defamation League.






103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 109

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is celebrating the 80th anniversary of 
        its founding in 1913;
Whereas ADL has been a major leader in our Nation's quest for justice and fair 
        treatment for all individuals alike by fighting bias, bigotry, and 
        racism and promoting understanding and respect;
Whereas in purpose and program, ADL espouses and fulfills the highest ideals and 
        aspirations of people of all faiths, races, and backgrounds, by 
        countering hatred and violence through the promotion of tolerance;
Whereas ADL's activities are a constant reminder to the world community never to 
        forget the Holocaust and to incorporate its lessons into political 
        systems and decisionmaking;
Whereas ADL has been a leading contributor to the cause of democracy, respect 
        for human rights and human dignity of all peoples, and the security of 
        Jewish communities around the world and of the State of Israel;
Whereas ADL's record of achievement sets an inspiring example of leadership and 
        participation in the struggle for justice;
Whereas ADL continues to grow in strength and scope while maintaining its 
        founding priority of educating the public about anti-Semitism and other 
        manifestations of prejudice; and
Whereas racism and other forms of intolerance still exist and in too many 
        instances lead to hate-inspired violence: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the Anti-Defamation League 
should be congratulated on its 80th anniversary and commended for 
effectively pursuing the goal of promoting greater tolerance throughout 
the world.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 5, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
# Proposal to Revise Federal UST

**Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection**  

### Storage Tank **Advisory C** **ommittee**

December 6, 2011 U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency

## Why Revise the 1988 Regulations? • Establish requirements comparable to the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005 • Ensure operation and maintenance of UST systems • Update current technology and codes of practice • Update State Program Approval (“SPA”) regulations 2 U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency

## The Proposed Revisions • Published in the Federal Register on 11/18/11 • www.epa.gov/oust/fedlaws/proposedregs.html • What documents you will find on the web documents will find on the web

– Preamble

– Comparison of 1988 regs and the proposed changes

– Redline/Strikeout version of 1988 regs

– The Docket • 253 changes recommended initially by all stakeholders • 16 proposed changes 3 U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency

## How to Comment • Four ways to submit comments

– Email to www.regulations.gov, or

– Email to mcdermott.elizabeth@epa.gov, or

– Mail to EPA’s Docket Center, or

– Hand deliver to EPA’s Docket Center 

### • Submit comments on or before February 16, 2012 4 U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of Stockhouse
Inc., a Colorado corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best
of such officers knowledge and belief, that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A  for
the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 10-K/A ) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Form 10-K/A  fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: April 3,
    2009 | /s/
      Joseph HN Lee
|----------------------- | -----------------------
|                        | Joseph HN Lee          
|                        | Chief Financial Officer

This certification shall not be
deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not
be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act or the Securities Exchange Act.

---
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 215 (Monday, November 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28384]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-542-001]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 31, 2000.
    Take notice that, on October 23, 2000, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet, to be effective March 
27, 2000.

Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 160A

    ANR states that this filing is made in compliance with the 
Commission's Order dated October 11, 2000 in the captioned proceeding.
    ANR states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
affected customers and state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385,211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Beginning November 1, 2000, comments and protests may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http;//www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28384 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 236

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 19 (legislative day, MAY 16), 1994

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL

4 OLYMPICS TORCH RELAY THROUGH CAPITOL

5 GROUNDS.

6 On May 20, 1994, or on such other date as the

7 Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Presi8 dent pro tempore of the Senate may jointly designate, the

9 1994 Special Olympics Torch Relay may be run through

10 the Capitol Grounds, as part of the journey of the Special

11 Olympics torch to the District of Columbia Special Olym12 pics summer games at Gallaudet University in the District

13 of Columbia.
2

•HCON 236 RDS

1 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

2 The Capitol Police Board shall take such action as

3 may be necessary to carry out section 1.

4 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA5 TIONS.

6 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions

7 for physical preparations for the event authorized by

8 section 1.

Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
*

The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, Chief Judge, United States District

Court for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of

Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-2729

___________

John Warda, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Minnesota.

*

Marty C. Anderson, Warden, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: July 29, 2005

Filed: August 8, 2005

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate John Warda challenges the district court’s*

 dismissal of Warda's

28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged the loss of good-time credits and

other sanctions following a disciplinary determination he had possessed contraband.

We affirm.
-2-

Contrary to Warda’s argument, due process requires only the existence of

“some evidence” to support the revocation of good-time credits. See Superintendent

v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 455 (1985) (due process requirements satisfied if “some

evidence” supports decision to revoke good-time credits). Having reviewed the

district court's findings for clear error, we conclude the record supports the court’s

determination the disciplinary decision was based on some evidence. See Hayes v.

Long, 72 F.3d 70, 72 n.2 (8th Cir. 1995). Among other things, the hearing officer

considered an incident report describing how a cooler with Warda’s name on it and

containing contraband was found under his bed during a search of his cubicle. The

officer also considered a memorandum which stated an FBI special agent had

interviewed Warda and Warda’s cubicle-mate, and had determined the items belonged

to Warda. 

Warda also argues the district court should have independently evaluated the

credibility of the confidential informant (CI ) whose information was considered by

the hearing officer, but this argument fails because “some evidence” other than the

CI information supports the disciplinary decision. See Hill, 472 U.S. at 455-57;

Espinoza v. Peterson, 283 F.3d 949, 952 (8th Cir.) (reviewing court must examine

reason for non-disclosure and reliability of CI only in cases where CI information is

needed to satisfy “some evidence” standard), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 870 (2002). 

Given the existence of some evidence to support the disciplinary determination,

Warda’s remaining arguments about application of the constructive-possession rule

and certain allegedly erroneous factual determinations are meritless. 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 10.8

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED FOR PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT. THE
CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND ARE DENOTED BY [***]. THE
CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

Joel S. Lisker
Senior Vice President
Security & Risk Management


MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL                               MasterCard
Franchise Management                                   International
2000 Purchase Street                                   ----------------------
Purchase, NY 10577-2509                                     [MASTERCARD LOGO]

914 249-5188
Fax 914 249-4256
Internet Home Page:
http://www.mastercard.com




June 29, 1998

Mr. Joshua C. Cantor
President
American Bank Note Holographics, Inc.
399 Executive Boulevard
Elmsford, New York 10523


Dear Joshua:

This letter agreement sets forth amendments to that agreement dated as of the
1st day of February, 1996 (the "Agreement") by and between MasterCard
International Incorporated ("MasterCard") and American Bank Note Holographics,
Inc. ("ABNH"). MasterCard and ABNH hereby agree as follows:

The first sentence of article 1.2 of the Agreement is amended by replacing the
words "five (5) years" with the words "seven (7) years."

Article 3.2 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the last two
sentences of article 3.3 of the Agreement are deleted in their entirety.

The following two (2) sentences are added to the article 6.0 of the Agreement:
"For so long as the Agreement is in effect, MasterCard shall fully satisfy its
payment obligations to ABNH with respect to the manufacture and storage of
holograms by paying [***]. In addition, ABNH shall be obligated to promptly
forward to MasterCard a refund equal to [***]."


<PAGE>   2


Joshua C. Cantor
June 29, 1998
Page 2




Except as set forth herein, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in
effect.

If this letter agreement is acceptable to ABNH, please so indicate by signing
below, where indicated, any by returning one of the two original copies of this
letter to my attention. This letter agreement will be effective as of the date
of your signature set forth below.


Very truly yours,

/s/ JOEL LISKER

Joel Lisker


Accepted and agreed to on behalf of American Bank Note Holographics, Inc.:


By:    /s/ JOSHUA C. CANTOR
       -----------------------------
       Joshua C. Cantor, President

Date:  9/4/98
       -----------------------------


cc: Nancy Meyer, Ellen O'Keeffe, Paul J. Paolucci, Michael Timko
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IRONBURG INVENTIONS LTD, 

Plaintiff,

v.

BATTLE BEAVER, LLC,

 Defendant.

Case No.: 3:22-CV-00686-X

Hon. Brantley Starr

DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Defendant Battle Beaver, LLC respectfully moves the Court for an order extending 

Defendant’s time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint for Patent Infringement (the 

“Complaint”). In support of this motion, Defendant states as follows:

1. Plaintiff Ironburg Inventions Ltd. filed its Complaint on March 24, 2022. 

2. Defendant was served on March 28, 2022. 

3. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a), Defendant’s response to the 

Complaint is due April 18, 2022.

4. Defendant seeks a 30-day extension of this deadline, such that Defendant’s 

response to the Complaint is due May 18, 2022.

5. The requested extension will allow Defendant’s counsel to familiarize itself with 

the facts of the case, investigate the allegations, and prepare an appropriate response.

6. This is Defendant’s first request for additional time in this action, and neither 

party will be prejudiced by the extension.

Case 3:22-cv-00686-X Document 14 Filed 04/13/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID 420
7. On April 12, 2022, Defendant’s counsel emailed Plaintiff’s counsel regarding the 

requested extension. On the same day, Plaintiff’s counsel confirmed that Plaintiff does not 

oppose this motion.

Based on the foregoing, Defendant respectfully requests that the Court grant this

unopposed motion for an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

DATED: April 13, 2022

/s/ William T. Reid, IV

William T. Reid, IV (TX No. 00788817)

wreid@reidcollins.com

Gregory S. Schwegmann (admission pending)

gschwegmann@reidcollins.com

Jeremy H. Wells (admission pending)

jwells@rctlegal.com

REID COLLINS & TSAI LLP

1301 S Capital of Texas Hwy 

Building C, Suite 300

Austin, Texas 78746

T: 512.647.6100

F: 512.647.6129

J. Benjamin King (TX No. 24046217)

bking@reidcollins.com

REID COLLINS & TSAI LLP

1601 Elm Street, Suite 4200

Dallas, Texas 75201

T: 214.420.8902

F: 214.420.8909

Counsel for Defendant Battle Beaver, LLC

Case 3:22-cv-00686-X Document 14 Filed 04/13/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID 421
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON April 12, 2022, the undersigned counsel consulted with 

counsel for Plaintiff, Brian Vanderwoude, who consented to the relief requested by this motion.

/s/ Jeremy H. Wells

Jeremy H. Wells

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on April 13, 2022, the foregoing document was filed electronically 

via the Court’s ECF System, which effects service upon counsel of record.

/s/ Jeremy H. Wells

Jeremy H. Wells

Case 3:22-cv-00686-X Document 14 Filed 04/13/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID 422
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0444. XAVIER WHITE v. THE STATE.

Xavier White pled guilty to armed robbery, two counts of burglary, second

degree criminal damage to property, possession of a firearm during the commission

of a felony, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and cruelty to children in

the third degree. He filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea, which the trial court

denied on May 5, 2014. White filed his notice of appeal on June 5, 2014. This notice

of appeal is untimely.

 To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the

order on appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice

of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. See Couch

v. United Paperworkers Intl. Union, 224 Ga. App. 721 (482 SE2d 704) (1997). 

Because White filed his notice of appeal 31 days after entry of the order he seeks to

appeal, it is untimely. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

We note, however, that White was represented by counsel and may be entitled

to pursue an out-of-time appeal. He is therefore informed of the following in

accordance with Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995): This appeal

has been dismissed because you failed to file a timely notice of appeal. If you still

wish to appeal, you may petition the trial court for leave to file an out-of-time appeal. 

If the trial court grants your request, you will have 30 days from the entry of that

order to file a notice of appeal referencing your conviction. If the trial court denies

your request, you will have 30 days from the entry of that order to file a notice of

appeal referencing the denial of your request for an out-of-time appeal.

November 23, 2015
 The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to White and to

White’s attorney, and the latter is also directed to send a copy to White.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e ,

Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract

from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of

Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of

said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above

written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/23/2015
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 128

Commending Israel concerning the decision of the Supreme Court of Israel

in the case of John Demjanjuk, Sr.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 29, 1993

Mr. TRAFICANT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending Israel concerning the decision of the Supreme

Court of Israel in the case of John Demjanjuk, Sr.

Whereas the July 29, 1993, decision of the Israeli Supreme

Court to overturn the conviction and death sentence of

John Demjanjuk, Sr., demonstrates Israel’s commitment

to the concept of individual rights;

Whereas the decision makes a powerful statement as to the

credibility of the Israeli judicial process considering the

extraordinary sensitivity surrounding the case; and

Whereas the decision demonstrates that Israel maintains the

highest standards of justice: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), The Congress commends the courageous deci3 sion by the Israeli Supreme Court to overturn the convic-
2

•HCON 128 IH

1 tion and death sentence in the case of John Demjanjuk,

2 Sr.

Æ