alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SAMUEL EDWARD ODOM

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2492

[ November 30, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Laura Sellers Johnson

, Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 2012CF000568AMB and 2012CF0011681AMB

.

Samuel Edward Odom, Orlando, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., C IKLIN and K LINGENSM ITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### KNIGHT v. STATE.

No. 21641.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 11, 1941.

D. F. Sanders, of Beaumont, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Under an information charging aggravated assault, the appellant was convicted of simple assault and his punishment assessed at a fine of $10.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

No errors appearing of record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Form 10-K for the Year ended December 31, 2007, pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Omega Protein Corporation, certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Omega Protein Corporation.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 12, 2008



/s/ ROBERT W. STOCKTONRobert W. Stockton Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Omega Protein Corporation or the certifying officer for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Omega Protein Corporation and will be retained by Omega Protein Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
-78 -77 -76 -75

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

09/05

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 05 Sep 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.44 N 77.04 W Meters AGL
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 206

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the House from

ruary 22, 1994.Friday, February 18, 1994, to Tuesday, Febate from Thursday, February 10, 1994, through1994, and an adjournment or recess of the SenFebruary 18, 1994, to Tuesday, February 22,Thursday, February 10, 1994, through Friday,
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 206

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on Thursday,

3 February 10, 1994, Friday, February 11, 1994, Saturday,

4 February 12, 1994, Sunday, February 13, 1994, Monday,

5 February 14, 1994, Tuesday, February 15, 1994,

6 Wednesday, February 16, 1994, Thursday, February 17,

7 1994, or Friday, February 18, 1994, pursuant to a motion

8 made by the Majority Leader or his designee, it stand ad9 journed until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, February 22, 1994, or

10 until noon on the second day after Members are notified

11 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res12 olution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate
2

HCON 206 EH

1 recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday,

2 February 10, 1994, Friday, February 11, 1994, Saturday,

3 February 12, 1994, Sunday, February 13, 1994, Monday,

4 February 14, 1994, Tuesday, February 15, 1994,

5 Wednesday, February 16, 1994, Thursday, February 17,

6 1994, or Friday, February 18, 1994, pursuant to a motion

7 made by the Majority Leader or his designee, in accord8 ance with this resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned

9 until noon on Tuesday, February 22, 1994, or at such

10 time as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his

11 designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon

12 on the second day after Members are notified to reassem13 ble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

14 whichever occurs first.

15 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

16 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

17 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead18 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

19 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

20 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives February 10,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SkillSoft Public Limited
Company (the "Company") for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Charles E. Moran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: December 10, 2004

                                        /s/ Charles E. Moran
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Charles E. Moran
                                        Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<MULTIPLIER>                                                     1,000,000

<S>                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               JAN-23-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                  JUL-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                    OCT-24-1999

<CASH>                                                                  49
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           64
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                                          1,241
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     1,354
<PP&E>                                                                 913
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       2,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                1,273
<BONDS>                                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                                             699
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         2,043
<SALES>                                                                656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       656
<CGS>                                                                  484
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          484
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         (3)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            (1)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     (2)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            (2)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         (.02)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                     32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CEO

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund II,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
George S. Springsteen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/      George S. Springsteen
------------------------------

George S. Springsteen
Chief Executive Officer
August 18, 2005
* The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1993

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * John W. Overcast, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 26, 2005 Filed: May 31, 2005

___________ Before SMITH, FAGG, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. John W. Overcast appeals the sentence the district court * imposed after Overcast pleaded guilty to a firearm offense. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Overcast has filed two supplemental briefs. We find no merit in any of the arguments raised by Overcast or his counsel.-2- Having conducted an independent review under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Thus, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      7,426,000
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,979,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   37,000
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           10,608,000
<PP&E>                                      5,083,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              1,190,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             30,926,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       4,017,000
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       17,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 26,641,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               30,926,000
<SALES>                                     1,443,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,443,000
<CGS>                                         369,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3,825,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,638,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,638,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,638,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7387

GEORGE SAMUEL GREEN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COUNSELS OF A-7-8 UNIT AND B-1 UNIT; D.

GARRHARTY, Warden; UNIT MANAGERS, A-7-8, B-1;

LIEUTENANTS OF UNIT, A-7-8, B-1; UNKNOWN SERGEANTS OF UNIT, A-7-8, B-1; UNKNOWN COMMANDING

OFFICERS OF UNIT, A-7-8, B-1; UNKNOWN LAW

LIBRARY MANAGER, A Unit, B Unit,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 97-7414

GEORGE SAMUEL GREEN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COUNSELS OF A-7-8 UNIT AND B-1 UNIT; D.

GARRHARTY, Warden; UNIT MANAGERS, A-7-8, B-1;

LIEUTENANTS OF UNIT, A-7-8, B-1; UNKNOWN SERGEANTS OF UNIT, A-7-8, B-1; UNKNOWN COMMANDING

OFFICERS OF UNIT, A-7-8, B-1; UNKNOWN LAW

LIBRARY MANAGER, A Unit, B Unit,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CA-97-26-2)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: July 31, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Samuel Green, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint and

denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Green

v. Counsels, No. CA-97-26-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 17 & 30, 1997). We deny

Appellant’s motion for an ex parte hearing. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### McCOY v. STATE.

No. 25202.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 28, 1951.

Rehearing Denied April 11, 1951.

*976No attorney, for appellant.

George *P.*Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for the offense of passing a forged instrument, with a penalty of two years in the penitentiary.

The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor bill of exception. All proceedings appear regular and nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment is affirmed.
MAY TERM, 1734.

#### Arthur Miller’s Lessee *against*William Hynson.

EJECTMENT for a tract of land called *Arcadia,*lying' on the east side of *Chesapeake*Bay, in *Kent*County.

At the trial of the cause at the Assises in *September,*1730, the Jury found the following verdict, viz. “We “ the Petit Jury do find for the defendant on the act of li~ “ mitations, and by our foreman we all so say.

“ William Graves.”

At *May*Term, 1731, the Provincial Court declared, “ on argument had before them, that the dispute therein “ relates to bounds only, and not to title, and that the sta- “ tute of limitations does not extend thereto, and therefore “ the verdict aforesaid by the Jury aforesaid in form “ aforesaid rendered, is void in law; and it is considered, “ that the said verdict shall be held void and for none.” A *venire facias de novo*ordered. At the Assises in *April,*1734, a special verdict was found, and judgment rendered thereon at this term, for the defendant.

Lib. E. J. No.J.ífol. 119.
(logo) C-III | C-III AssetManagement  

 

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

 

The undersigned, Barry Davis,President of C-III Asset Management LLC (*f/k/a Centerline Servicing LLC*),the Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement datedas of March 1, 2015, relating to the **CSAIL 2015-C1 Commercial MortgageTrust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C1** (the“Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.       a review of the activities of the Special Servicer andof its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement during thecalendar year 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) has been made under theundersigned’s supervision;

 

2.       to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based onsuch review, the Special Servicer maintained an effective internal controlsystem relating to its servicing of the Mortgage Loans serviced by it and hasfulfilled in all material respects its obligations under the Pooling andServicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2019, I havehereuntosigned my name.

 

 

/s/ Barry Davis

**Barry Davis**, President

C-III Asset Management LLC, a

Delaware limited liabilitycompany 

 

CSAIL 2015-C1
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 1 Filed 03/24/22 Page 1 of 14 PageID 1
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 1 Filed 03/24/22 Page 2 of 14 PageID 2
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 1 Filed 03/24/22 Page 3 of 14 PageID 3
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 1 Filed 03/24/22 Page 4 of 14 PageID 4
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 1 Filed 03/24/22 Page 5 of 14 PageID 5
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 1 Filed 03/24/22 Page 6 of 14 PageID 6
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 1 Filed 03/24/22 Page 7 of 14 PageID 7
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 1 Filed 03/24/22 Page 8 of 14 PageID 8
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 1 Filed 03/24/22 Page 9 of 14 PageID 9
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 1 Filed 03/24/22 Page 10 of 14 PageID 10
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 1 Filed 03/24/22 Page 11 of 14 PageID 11
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 1 Filed 03/24/22 Page 12 of 14 PageID 12
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 1 Filed 03/24/22 Page 13 of 14 PageID 13
Case 4:22-cv-00214-O Document 1 Filed 03/24/22 Page 14 of 14 PageID 14
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PAGE 1

MWZM: 22-000092-671

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, §

§

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. §

§

Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-00664-KBK

§

DONAVAN MILLER, §

§

Defendant. §

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff PHH Mortgage Corporation (“PHH” or “Plaintiff”) filed this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal Without Prejudice (“Notice”) pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, and shows the Court as follows:

1. On March 22, 2022, Plaintiff filed its Original Complaint (“Complaint”) against

Defendant Donavan Miller (“Defendant”) to obtain an order authorizing foreclosure of Plaintiff’s

security interest on the real property located at 121 Jenny Kay Lane, Irving, Texas 75060. (ECF 

No. 1.)

2. Plaintiff completed service on Defendant. (ECF No. 5.) No appearance and/or 

answer has been filed by Defendant. 

3. Plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue its claims for foreclosure against Defendant.

Accordingly, it files this Notice, pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure. Plaintiff files this Notice before Defendant filed an answer or motion for summary 

judgment. As such, Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the claims it has asserted herein against 

Defendant without prejudice to the re-filing of the same.

Case 3:22-cv-00664-K-BK Document 9 Filed 06/06/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 77
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PAGE 2

MWZM: 22-000092-671

4. This dismissal will finally dispose of all parties and all claims. Defendant will not 

be prejudiced by this voluntary dismissal.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff respectfully requests the 

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Donavan Miller be dismissed without prejudice, that no 

prejudice attach to such dismissal, and that Plaintiff be awarded all other relief to which Plaintiff

may be entitled.

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Vivian N. Lopez

MARK D. CRONENWETT

Texas Bar No. 00787303

mcronenwett@mwzmlaw.com

VIVIAN N. LOPEZ

Texas Bar No. 24129029

vlopez@mwzmlaw.com

MACKIE WOLF ZIENTZ & MANN, P. C.

14160 North Dallas Parkway, Suite 900

Dallas, TX 75254

Telephone: 214-635-2650

Facsimile: 214-635-2686

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 3:22-cv-00664-K-BK Document 9 Filed 06/06/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 78
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

William Charles Fraiser III, * From the 238th District Court

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR54881.

Vs. No. 11-21-00164-CR * October 20, 2022

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J. 

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
**Exhibit 8**

 

**List of Principal Subsidiaries**

**of**

**Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V.**

** **
| **Subsidiary**                                              | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------|
| **Gruma Corporation**                                       |       | Nevada, United States                       |
| **Azteca Milling, L.P.**                                    |       | Nevada, United States                       |
| **Compañía Nacional Almacenadora, S.A. de. C.V.** |       | Mexico                                      |

 

----
#### PAUL HIRSCH ET AL. *v.*CAROL TOLONEN ET AL.

*Neil R. Marcus,*in support of the petition.

*Richard P. Hastings,*in opposition.

Decided May 26, 1998

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 445 (AC 16949), is denied.
Case 4:22-cr-00094-P Document 37 Filed 04/20/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 56
Case 4:22-cr-00094-P Document 37 Filed 04/20/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 57