alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries of the Company

|Name of
      Subsidiary               | State or Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|-------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------
|Stockgroup Media Inc.                  | British Columbia                      
|Stockgroup Systems Ltd.                | Nevada                                
|Stockgroup.com (Bahamas) Ltd.          | Bahamas                               
|Stockgroup.com International Inc.      | Bahamas                               
|Stockscores Analytics Corp.            | British Columbia                      
|579818 B.C. Ltd.                       | British Columbia                      
|Stockgroup Systems (UK) Limited        | United Kingdom                        
|Aether Systems (UK) Limited            | United Kingdom                        
|Stockgroup Systems (Benelux) B.V.      | The Netherlands                       
|Stockgroup Systems
      (Spain), S.A. | Spain                                 

Stockgroup Information Systems Inc. owns 100% of the issued and
outstanding voting common shares of 579818 B.C. Ltd., which is an intermediary
holding company with no activity and which wholly owns Stockgroup Media Inc., a
British Columbia corporation. Stockgroup Media Inc. is our Canadian operating
company, and is the company where significantly all of our current operations
reside. Stockgroup Media Inc. owns 50% of Stockscores Analytics Corp., a British
Columbia corporation with no activity at this time and no material impact on us.
In addition, we wholly own Stockgroup Systems Ltd., a Nevada Corporation, which
is our U.S. operating company, which is where our U.S. operations reside.

As part of our acquisition of the Mobile Finance Division
(MFD) of TeleCommunications Systems, Inc (TCS) in January 2007, we acquired
four European entities (TeleCommunications Systems Limited, Aether Systems (UK)
Limited, TeleCommunications Systems Benelux BV and TeleCommunications Systems
Iberian SA). We wholly own the successor companies to these entities, i.e.,
Stockgroup Systems (UK) Limited, which in turn owns 100% of Aether Systems (UK)
Limited, Stockgroup Systems (Benelux) B.V. and Stockgroup Systems (Spain), S.A.
Our European operations relating to the MFD business acquired from TCS by
Stockgroup reside in these companies.

Effective January 14, 2007, Stockgroup Australia Pty Ltd, an
Australia Corporation, was deregistered. Effective August 31, 2002,
Stockgroup.com (Bahamas) Ltd. and Stockgroup.com International Inc. were struck
from record. While they have not been deregistered they have no net assets at
December 31, 2007.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.37

                                 AMENDMENT TO

                              RENTRAK CORPORATION
                           1997 EQUITY PARTICIPATION
                                     PLAN


     Rentrak Corporation, an Oregon corporation (the "Company"), hereby amends
the 1997 Equity Participation Plan (the "Plan") as set forth below.  The Company
wishes to make loans pursuant to the Vested Option Loan Program to certain
optionees under the Plan for the purpose of exercising options granted
thereunder, which loans may be without recourse.  Accordingly, Section 5.2(d)(v)
of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety and shall read as follows:

     (v) Allow payment, in whole or in part, through the delivery of a
     promissory note (which may be without recourse or of limited recourse as
     determined by the Committee or the Board ) bearing interest (at no less
     than such rate as shall then preclude the imputation of interest under the
     Code) and payable upon such terms as may be prescribed by the Committee or
     the Board;
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,371
<SECURITIES>                                    37,252
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                       588
<INVENTORY>                                        313
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,725
<PP&E>                                          12,331
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,059
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,669
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,308
<SALES>                                         22,301
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,301
<CGS>                                            3,617
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (488)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,432
<INCOME-TAX>                                       515
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,917
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,917
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

JOHN HAYLEY and LAUREN HAYLEY, §

 §

Plaintiffs, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 7:22-cv-00036-O

 §

MERIDIAN SECURITY INSURANCE §

COMPANY, §

 §

Defendant. §

 

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Claim for Attorneys’ Fees. 

ECF No. 8. By Order entered on August 4, 2022, United States District Judge Reed O’Connor 

referred the Motion and all related responses, replies, briefs in support, appendices, etc. to the 

undersigned. ECF No. 14. After reviewing the Motion and Defendant’s Amended Certificate of 

Conference (ECF No. 12), the Court ordered Plaintiffs to file a notice on or before September 26, 

2022 stating whether they were opposed or unopposed to the Motion. ECF No. 19. The Plaintiffs

filed a Notice of Non-Opposition on September 24, 2022, stating that they did not oppose 

Defendant’s Motion. ECF No. 20. Accordingly, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Judge 

O’Connor GRANT Defendant’s Motion (ECF No. 8).

A copy of these findings, conclusions, and recommendation shall be served on all parties 

in the manner provided by law. Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), each party to this action has the right 

to serve and file specific written objections in the United States District Court to the United States 

Magistrate Judge’s proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation within fourteen (14) days 

after the party has been served with a copy of this document. The United States District Judge need 

Case 7:22-cv-00036-O Document 24 Filed 09/29/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 867
2

only make a de novo determination of those portions of the United States Magistrate Judge’s 

proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which specific objection is timely made. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure to file by the date stated above a specific written objection to a 

proposed factual finding or legal conclusion will bar a party, except upon grounds of plain error 

or manifest injustice, from attacking on appeal any such proposed factual findings and legal 

conclusions accepted by the United States District Judge. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto 

Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428–29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1) (extending the deadline to file objections from ten to fourteen days).

SIGNED on September 29, 2022. 

______________________________________

Hal R. Ray, Jr.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 7:22-cv-00036-O Document 24 Filed 09/29/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 868
#### The State, ex rel. Crotty, a Taxpayer, Appellant, *v.*Zangerle, County Auditor, et al., Appellees. 

(No. 28330

Decided December 4, 1940.)

*Mr. Jolm J. Tetlow, Mr. John J. Sheehan, Mr. John J. Kennedy, Mr. Wesley L. Grills, Mr. Bay T. Miller*and *Mr. Don G. Miller,*for appellant.

*Mr. Frank T. Cullitan,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Saul S. Danaceau,*for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Turner, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND ON PAGES 1 THROUGH 3 OF THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER AND YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                             848
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                       675
<INVENTORY>                                     60,482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,808
<PP&E>                                          57,497
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,466
<BONDS>                                         11,709
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,391
<SALES>                                        111,392
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,392
<CGS>                                           99,953
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   99,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,342
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,765)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (659)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,106)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,106)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.33)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting.

*Name and Committee Code:*                        Special Emphasis in Mathematical Sciences (1204).                    

*Date and Time:*                        November, 29-December 1, 2000; 8:30 a.m. until 5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                        Room 320, 330, & 360, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                        Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                        Drs. Henry Warchall, Deborah F. Lockhart, Benjamin M. Mann, John Stufken, and Joe Jenkins, Program Director, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8870.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                        To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposal submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                        To review and evaluate proposals concerning the Fluid Dynamics Panel, as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                        The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: October 31, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Manager Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-28397  Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/18 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 215 (Monday, November 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28340]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Minority Programs Review Committee, MBRS 
Review Subcommittee B.
    Date: November 15-16, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Michael A. Sesma, PhD, Office of Scientific 
Review, NIGMS, Natcher Building, Room 1AS19, 45 Center Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2048.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 27, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-28340 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Report to the Congress Regarding Conditions in Burma and U.S. Policy Toward Burma

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the requirements set forth under the heading “Policy Toward Burma” in section 570(d) of the Fiscal Year 1997 Foreign Operations Appropriations Act, as contained in the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act (Public Law 104-208), a report is required every 6 months following enactment concerning:

1) progress toward democratization in Burma;

2) progress on improving the quality of life of the Burmese people, including progress on market reforms, living standards, labor standards, use of forced labor in the tourism industry, and environmental quality; and

3) progress made in developing a comprehensive, multilateral strategy to bring democracy to and improve human rights practices and the quality of life in Burma, including the development of a dialogue between the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) and democratic opposition groups in Burma.

                        You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit the report fulfilling these requirements for the period March 27, 2000, through September 28, 2000, to the appropriate committees of the Congress and to arrange for its publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

[FR Doc. 00-28603

Billing code 4710-10-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 92 (Wednesday, May 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27432-27433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11555]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9131]

In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of al-Qa'ida (and 
Other Aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization Pursuant to Section 
219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this 
matter pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) and (b) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C), (b)) (``INA''), 
and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the 
Treasury, the Secretary of State concludes that the circumstances that 
were the basis for the 2009 decision to maintain the designation of the 
aforementioned

[[Page 27433]]

organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization have not changed in 
such a manner as to warrant revocation of the designation and that the 
national security of the United States does not warrant a revocation of 
the designation.
    Therefore, the Secretary of State hereby determines that the 
designation of the aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist 
Organization, pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall 
be maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 1, 2015.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-11555 Filed 5-12-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
```
#### Ex parte EREMO.

No. 26452.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 13, 1953.

*713No attorney on appeal for .appellant. ,

William H. Scott, Crim. Dist. Atty., and King C. Haynie, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., Houston, Wesley Dice, Staté’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

This is an extradition case. The Governor of this State issued his executive warrant based upon the requisition and supporting papers of the Acting Governor of the State of Illinois, authorizing the arrest, delivery, and return of appellant to the State of Illinois, to answer a charge of robbery.

Appellant sought his discharge by a writ of habeas corpus filed in Criminal District Court No. 3 of Harris County, Texas. After a hearing, appellant was remanded to the sheriff of Harris County .for delivery to the agent of the State of Illinois, and from said order gave notice of appeal.

The executive warrant of the Governor of this State and the requisition and accompanying papers were introduced in evidence. They made out a prima facie case that the accused is a fugitive from justice and is subject to extradition.

Appellant testified that he was in the State of Michigan on November 30, 1950, the time the offense was ■ alleged to have been committed and, therefore, could not have been in the State of Illinois on said date.

Nathan Freeman testified on' the hearing in this case that he was the victim of the robbery upon which the cause is based; identified appellant at the hearing; stated that appellant was 1⁄8 the State of Illinois at the time the offense was committed; and that appellant committed the offense. Among the papers accompanying the requisition of the Governor of the State of Illinois is an affidavit stating that appellant was in said state at the time the offense was committed and that he committed the offense.

The trial court, in remanding appellant for extradition, resolved the issue of his presence in the demanding state at the time of the alleged commission of the offense against him.

Under the executive warrant of the Governor of this State, the requisition and accompanying papers, and the evidence, the trial court was authorized to conclude as he did, and remand the appellant for extradition. Delgado v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 252 S.W.2d 935.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50905 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SALVADOR DE LOS SANTOS-GARCIA, also known as Rosario Moreno, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-90

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Salvador De Los Santos-Garcia raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.