IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

THOMAS LENOIS, #2360417, §

PLAINTIFF, §

§

V. § CIVIL CASE NO. 3:22-CV-523-N-BK

§

HUTCHINS STATE JAIL, §

DEFENDANT. §

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Special Order 3, this pro se case was referred to the 

United States magistrate judge for case management, including the issuance of findings and a 

recommended disposition where appropriate. For the reasons that follow, this action should be 

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with a court order. 

On March 8, 2022, the Court issued a deficiency order, which advised Plaintiff that, 

insofar as he sought to proceed with a civil action, he must file a complaint on the courtapproved form, along with filing and administrative fees of $402.00 or a request to proceed in 

forma pauperis. Doc. 4. See also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); N.D. TEX. MISC. ORD. 14 (requiring 

inmates to file civil rights complaints and motions to proceed in forma pauperis on the courtapproved forms). The deadline for Plaintiff’s response was April 6, 2022. However, Plaintiff 

has not responded to the Court’s deficiency order, nor has he sought an extension of time to do 

so. 

Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a court to dismiss an action sua 

sponte for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with the federal rules or any court order. 

Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030, 1031 (5th Cir. 1998). “This authority flows from the court’s 

Case 3:22-cv-00523-N-BK Document 5 Filed 04/14/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 6
2

inherent power to control its docket and prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending 

cases.” Boudwin v. Graystone Ins. Co., Ltd., 756 F.2d 399, 401 (5th Cir. 1985) (citing Link v. 

Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962)). 

Plaintiff has been given ample opportunity to respond to the Court’s order. He has 

impliedly refused or declined to do so. Therefore, this action should be DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with a court order and for lack of prosecution. 

See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b) (an involuntary dismissal “operates as an adjudication on the merits,” 

unless otherwise specified).

SO RECOMMENDED on April 14, 2022.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE AND

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL/OBJECT

A copy of this report and recommendation will be served on all parties in the manner provided by 

law. Any party who objects to any part of this report and recommendation must file specific 

written objections within 14 days after being served with a copy. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED.

R. CIV. P. 72(b). An objection must identify the specific finding or recommendation to which 

objection is made, state the basis for the objection, and specify the place in the magistrate judge’s 

report and recommendation where the disputed determination is found. An objection that merely 

incorporates by reference or refers to the briefing before the magistrate judge is not specific. 

Failure to file specific written objections will bar the aggrieved party from appealing the factual 

findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge that are accepted or adopted by the district 

court, except upon grounds of plain error. See Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass’n, 79 

F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996), modified by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to 

file objections to 14 days).

Case 3:22-cv-00523-N-BK Document 5 Filed 04/14/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 7