alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            -------------------------
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             -----------------------
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                             ----------------------
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Power & Equipment Corp. &
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark J. Wright, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




                                       /s/ Mark J. Wright
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Name: Mark J. Wright
                                       Chief Financial Officer and Principal
                                       Accounting Officer
                                       Date: June 16, 2008



     A signed original of the written statements required by Section 906 has
been provided to Western Power & Equipment Corp. & Subsidiary and will be
retained by Western Power & Equipment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>                                                           5 

        
<S>                                                   <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1995 
<PERIOD-START>                                            JAN-01-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                                              JUN-30-1996 
<CASH>                                                         73,367 
<SECURITIES>                                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               73,367 
<PP&E>                                                         50,628 
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 26,125 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 97,870 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1,609,946 
<BONDS>                                                             0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                                         0 
<COMMON>                                                       13,427
<OTHER-SE>                                                  8,363,766 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                1,512,076 
<SALES>                                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    0 
<CGS>                                                               0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0 
<CHANGES>                                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                        0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   (0.01) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0 
         


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0719. CITY OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA et al. v. GREGORY D.

COUNTRYMAN, SR. et al.

In this case, a Marshall and Clerk of the Columbus Municipal Court sued the

City of Columbus, its mayor, and council members, contending they were deprived

of their rights, duties and obligations as elected officials with regard to the budget

process. The suitsought, among other things, injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and

attorneys fees in their personal and official capacities. The defendants moved to

dismiss all claims. The trial court found that the claims for injunctive relief were

barred by sovereign immunity, but declined to dismiss the remaining claims. The

defendantsfiled a direct appeal in the Supreme Court, which transferred the case here.

They argue that sovereign immunity barred additional claims.

On March 25, 2016, the Supreme Court of Georgia issued an opinion holding

that the collateral order doctrine, which provided a right of direct appeal from certain

interlocutory rulings, no longer applies to cases of sovereign, official, qualified, or

other immunity. Rivera v. Washington, __ Ga. __ (Case No. S15G0887, decided

March 25, 2016). The Supreme Court of Georgia has confirmed that Rivera applies

to cases pending on appeal. Kliesrath et al. v. Estate of Audrecas Davis et al., __ Ga.

__ (Case No. S15G1206, decided April 26, 2016). Thus, the defendants in this case

were required to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b)

to obtain immediate appellate review of their immunity arguments. Because the

defendants failed to follow the required appellate procedure, we lack jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

May 06, 2016
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/06/2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than November 22, 2000. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272: 

1. William Elton Kennedy, MerRouge, Louisiana, and William Edward Pratt, Bastrop, Louisiana; both to acquire voting shares of American National Bancshares, Inc., Ruston, Louisiana, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of American Bank of Ruston, N.A., Ruston, Louisiana. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 2, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-28530 Filed 11-6-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                              EXHIBIT 12


                                                               MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V
                                                                MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.
                                                                 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                                                   COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                                          (dollars in thousands)



                                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED              FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                      DECEMBER 28, 2001                  DECEMBER 29, 2000               DECEMBER 31, 1999
                           ---------------------------------  ---------------------------------  ----------------------------------
                              MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                                 PREFERRED       PREFERRED          PREFERRED       PREFERRED        PREFERRED       PREFERRED
                            CAPITAL TRUST V  FUNDING  V,L.P.   CAPITAL TRUST V  FUNDING  V,L.P.   CAPITAL TRUST V  FUNDING  V, L.P.
                           ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ----------------

<S>                        <C>                 <C>            <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>

Earnings                       $ 63,795           $ 74,794        $ 63,795           $ 74,901         $ 63,795            $ 74,798
                               ========           ========        ========           ========         ========            ========


Fixed charges                  $      -           $      -        $      -           $      -         $      -            $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution
 requirements                    61,880             63,795          61,880             63,795           61,880              63,795
                               --------           --------        --------           --------         --------            --------

Total combined fixed
 charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirements                  $ 61,880           $ 63,795        $ 61,880           $ 63,795         $ 61,880            $ 63,795
                               ========           ========        ========           ========         ========            ========

Ratio of earnings to
 combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements         1.03               1.17            1.03               1.17             1.03                1.17


</TABLE>
#### George PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27217.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 1, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is unlawfully carrying ■ a pistol; the punishment, a .fine of $150.

The record is before us without a statement -of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed;
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          42,444                   3,779
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,033                  45,548
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (799)                 (1,266)
<INVENTORY>                                     14,576                  18,474
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,629                  69,392
<PP&E>                                         106,526                 136,630
<DEPRECIATION>                                (22,550)                (14,822)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 231,320                 233,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,050                  36,502
<BONDS>                                        139,101                 143,186
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,097                   6,935
<PREFERRED>                                     11,079                   9,562
<COMMON>                                        21,501                  21,501
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,745)                 (4,689)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   231,320                 233,354
<SALES>                                        292,354                 153,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               292,354                 153,815
<CGS>                                          235,441                 124,071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  278,968                 146,987
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   521                     321
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,985                   7,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,645)                 (1,613)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (155)                      20
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,490)                 (1,633)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,539)                 (2,658)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed September 29, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1543

Lower Tribunal No. F18-1429

________________

Vaughan Johnson, Jr.,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mavel Ruiz, Judge.

Vaughan Johnson, Jr., in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      23,418,656
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,884,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                   863,293
<INVENTORY>                                 24,964,808
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            70,767,394
<PP&E>                                      47,696,220
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,598,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             161,151,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,004,480
<BONDS>                                    126,231,130
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,458
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,101,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               161,151,962
<SALES>                                     45,608,166
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            45,608,166
<CGS>                                       36,494,178
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               36,494,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,402,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,678,452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,703,207)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,094,117)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,609,090)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,609,090)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        

</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM

TO: Docket for Reconsideration of 2008 Ozone NAAQS (Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

OAR

- 2005

- 0172 )
RE: Meeting s with OMB on draft Ozone Reconsideration Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
On December 10, 2009 EPA and OMB discuss ed OMB’s comments on the draf t Ozone Reconsideration Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) sent to OMB on October 20, 2009. In response to requests from OMB, EPA mad e the following changes to the notice: deletion of text that included details of the history of the exchange between OMB and EPA just prior to issuance of the final 2008 Ozone NAAQS rule , and clarification of the nature of the Administrator’s discretion in selecting a primary standard that is requisite to protect public health with an adequate margin of safety. These chang es were included in a version of the draft Ozone NPR sent to OMB on December 16, 2009. On December 29, 2009 EPA and OMB met to discuss OMB’s comments on the December 16 version of the draft Ozone NPR. A representative from CEA also participated in the di scussion. OMB raised several points on which they requested the following changes to the notice: additional discussion of the benefits associated with the proposed secondary

standard; solicitation of comment on the incremental benefits of the proposed se condary

standard relative to the benefits of the secondary standard set in 2008; deletion of remaining text that included details of the history of the exchange between OMB and EPA just prior to issuance of the final 2008 Ozone NAAQS rule; acknowledgement that there were differing views on the interpretation of the Adams studies and EPA’s reanaly sis of data from the Adams (2006) study ; further clarification of the nature of the Administrator’s discretion in selecting a primary standard that is requisite to protect public health with an adequate margin of safety ; and solicitation of comment on the incremental benefits of a primary standard set within the proposed range of levels relative to the benefits associated with the primary standard set in 2008. These changes were included in a version of the draft Ozone NPR sent to OMB on December 30, 2009. On January 5 , 2009 EPA and OMB met to discuss OMB’s comments on the December 30 version of the draft Ozone NPR. OMB requested two changes . The first concerned the description of EPA’s use of the Adams studies in its rationale for the March 2008 decision. The second addressed the characterization of the Administrator’s decision in concluding that important and significant risks to public health are likel y to occur at the level of the 2008 primary standard and the d escription of the evidence considered by

the Administrator in reaching this conclusion. EPA made changes to address these comments and sent the revisions to OMB in an e

- mail on January 5, 2010. These changes were also included in the final version of the draft Ozone NPR sent to OMB later that day

.