alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3627 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3627

 To require the Attorney General to report on State law penalties for 
             certain child abusers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2013

Mr. Pittenger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Attorney General to report on State law penalties for 
             certain child abusers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kilah Davenport Child Protection Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. ATTORNEY GENERAL REPORT.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
and again 3 years thereafter, the Attorney General shall publish and 
submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on the Judiciary of the United States 
Senate a report on the penalties for violations of laws prohibiting 
child abuse in each of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and 
each territory of the United States, including whether the laws of that 
State, District, or territory provides for enhanced penalties when the 
victim has suffered serious bodily injury, or permanent or protracted 
loss or impairment of any mental or emotional function.

SEC. 3. EXPANSION OF PREDICATE FOR INCREASED PENALTIES FOR CERTAIN 
              DOMESTIC ASSAULTS.

    Section 117(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``, or against a child of or in the care of the person 
committing the domestic assault'' after ``intimate partner''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21

Omega Protein Corporation owns 100% of the common stock of:



| |  |  | Protein Finance Company, a Delaware corporation
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Omega International Distribution Company, a Delaware corporation (formerly named Omega Net, Inc.)
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Omega Shipyard, Inc., a Delaware corporation
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Omega Protein, Inc., a Virginia corporation
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Protein Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, wholly owned subsidiary
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Owns 1% of the equity of Omega Protein Mexico S. de R. L. de C.V., a Mexican corporation (Omega Protein Mexico)
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Omega International Marketing Company, a Delaware corporation
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Owns 99% of the equity of Omega Protein Mexico
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------
#### The State, *Appellant,*v. Kanaman.

Criminal Law: INFORMATION: amendment. A complaint or information for a criminal offence in a case originating in a justice’s court cannot be amended in the circuit court.

*Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court.*— How. M. G. McGregor, Judge.

Aeeirmed.

*B. Cr. Boone,*Attorney General, for the state.

*Landrum & Lams*for respondent.

The action of the trial court, was proper. There was no proper information filed and nothing to amend. *State v. Russell,*88 Mo. 648.

Nortoh, C. J.

Complaint was made by a private person before a justice of the peace charging defendant with a misdemeanor. She was tried and convicted, and appealed to the circuit court, when she filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it was filed by a private person; the prosecuting attorney offered to file an amended complaint which the court refused, and sustained the motion to .dismiss, and it is from this action of the court that the state has appealed. On the authority of the case of *State v. Russell,*88 Mo. 648, we must hold that the action of the circuit court was proper; and the judgment is' hereby affirmed.

All concur, except Judge Sherwood, absent.
Exhibit 12.1

CALCULATION OF CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

Year Ended December 31,(Dollars in thousands)

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006Earnings:Income (Loss) before income taxes

$
(61,623
)
$
(24,694
)
$
375

$
22,233

$
26,507Fixed Charges:Interest on deposits


8,086


13,462


20,035


24,211


19,588Interest on notes payable to subsidiary grantor trust, repurchase agreements, and other borrowings


2,426


2,864


4,409


2,801


2,937Rent expense interest factor


909


853


905


881


792Total fixed charges:Including interest on deposits

$
11,421

$
17,179

$
25,349

$
27,893

$
23,317Excluding interest on deposits

$
3,335

$
3,717

$
5,314

$
3,682

$
3,729Ratio of earnings to fixed charges:Excluding interest on deposits


(17.48
)

(5.64
)

1.07


7.04


8.11Including interest on deposits


(4.40
)

(0.44
)

1.01


1.80


2.14


(1)This
amount is the portion of rent expense (generally one-third) deemed representative of the interest factor.




---



CALCULATION OF CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS

Year Ended December 31,(Dollars in thousands)

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006Earnings:Income (Loss) before income taxes

$
(61,623
)
$
(24,694
)
$
375

$
22,233

$
26,507Fixed Charges:Interest on deposits


8,086


13,462


20,035


24,211


19,588Interest on notes payable to subsidiary grantor trust, repurchase agreements, and other borrowings


2,426


2,864


4,409


2,801


2,937Preferred stock dividends


2,027


2,028


222





Rent expense interest factor


909


853


905


881


792Total fixed charges:Including interest on deposits

$
13,448

$
19,207

$
25,571

$
27,893

$
23,317Excluding interest on deposits

$
5,362

$
5,745

$
5,536

$
3,682

$
3,729Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends:Excluding interest on deposits


(10.49
)

(3.30
)

1.07


7.04


8.11Including interest on deposits


(3.58
)

(0.29
)

1.01


1.80


2.14


(1)This
amount is the portion of rent expense (generally one-third) deemed representative of the interest factor.




---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1 CEO Certification

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
June 30, 2002 (Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, on
the date hereof, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Technology Visions
Group, Inc. (the "Company"), certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
USC 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.302 and promulgated as 18 USC 1350 pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report referenced above has been read and reviewed by the
         undersigned.

2.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

3.       The Report referenced above does not contain any untrue statement of a
         material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to
         makes the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
         such statements were made, not misleading.

4.       I acknowledge that the management of the Company is solely responsible
         for the fair presentation in the financial statements of the financial
         position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company in
         conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
         States of America.

Based upon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other such financial
information included in the report, fairly present the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company as of and for the period ended June 30,
2002.

In my opinion, the accompanying interim financial statements, prepared in
accordance with the instructions for Form 10-QSB, are unaudited and contain all
material adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary
to present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the Company for the respective interim periods presented. The current period
results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results which ultimately
will be reported for the full fiscal year.

Additionally, I acknowledge that the Company's Board of Directors and Management
are solely responsible for adopting sound accounting practices, establishing and
maintaining a system of internal control and preventing and detecting fraud. The
Company's system of internal accounting control is designed to assure, among
other items, that 1) recorded transactions are valid; 2) valid transactions are
recorded; and 3) transactions are recorded in the proper period in a timely
manner to produce financial statements which present fairly the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the
respective periods being presented.

/s/ James B. Lahey
-------------------
James B. Lahey
Chief Executive Officer
Dated: August 14, 2002
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 21, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 21, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18D0444. XAVIER WOMACK v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

SU96CR2290
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3402 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3402

To improve the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by explicitly barring 
   debt collectors from bringing legal action on a debt in which the 
statute of limitations has expired against any consumer, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2013

    Mr. Cohen (for himself, Mr. Conyers, Ms. Norton, and Ms. Moore) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To improve the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by explicitly barring 
   debt collectors from bringing legal action on a debt in which the 
statute of limitations has expired against any consumer, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Debt Collection Improvement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. COLLECTION OF TIME-BARRED DEBT.

    (a) Legal Actions on Time-Barred Debt.--Section 811 of the Fair 
Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. 1692i) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``(c) A debt collector may not bring, or threaten to bring, legal 
action against any consumer on a debt in which the statute of 
limitations has expired.''.
    (b) Communication With Consumers With Time-Barred Debt.--Section 
805 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 1692c) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Communication With Consumers With Time-Barred Debt.--In 
connection with the collection of debt in which the statute of 
limitations has expired, a debt collector shall disclose to a consumer 
the following:
            ``(1) The debt has been transferred to the debt collector.
            ``(2) The creditor no longer holds the debt.
            ``(3) As a result of the expiration of the statute of 
        limitations with respect to such debt, the debt collector may 
        not bring legal action against the consumer to collect such 
        debt.
            ``(4) Any payment by the consumer towards the debt may 
        cause the statute of limitations for such debt to reset.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-755

In Re: RONALD GRAHAM,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-97-692)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 20, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Graham, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Contrary to Graham’s belief, this is the correct filing fee.

2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Graham petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus

asking that the district court be required to process his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (1994) action immediately. Mandamus is a drastic remedy and

should only be granted in extraordinary situations. See In re

Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). The district court

received Graham’s $150 filing fee* on October 31, 1997, and the

magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation on April 30,

1998. We accordingly find that there has been no unreasonable delay

in the district court. Therefore, we deny the petition. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 10.5


Deloitte & Co. S.R.L.
Florida 234, Piso 5
C1005AAF Buenos Aires
Argentina

Tel.: (54-11) 4320-2700/4326-4046
Fax: (54-11) 4325-8081/4326-7340
www.deloitte.com.ar


                                                                  Deloitte
                                                                  & Touche




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the use, in this Annual Report of Localiza Master Franchisee
Argentina S.A. on Form 20-F filed on June 30, 2003 (File No. 333-8128-04),
which is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3
filed on August 24, 2001 (Registration No. 333-13852-04), of our report dated
February 28, 2003.



Buenos Aires, Argentina

    June 30, 2003

/s/ Omar Raul Rolotti (Partner)
ACCEPTED 04-13-00239-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 1/14/2015 10:24:08 AM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                  CONSENT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-32598, 333-39054, 333-40182, 333-48170,
333-51518, 333-54808) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-97461) of Dynabazaar, Inc. of
our report dated March 9, 2005 relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ Rothstein Kass & Company, PC

Roseland, New Jersey
March 31, 2005
Exhibit 21

Omega Protein Corporation owns 100% of the common stock of:



| |  |  | Protein Finance Company, a Delaware corporation
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Omega International Distribution Company, a Delaware corporation (formerly named Omega Net, Inc.)
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Omega Shipyard, Inc., a Delaware corporation
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Zapata Inversiones Chile, a Chilean corporation (inactive)
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Omega Protein, Inc., a Virginia corporation
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Protein Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, wholly owned subsidiary
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Owns 1% of the equity of Omega Protein Mexico S. de R. L. de C.V., a Mexican corporation (Omega Protein Mexico)
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Omega International Marketing Company, a Delaware corporation
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Owns 99% of the equity of Omega Protein Mexico
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

                           Eagle Family Foods, Inc.
                      Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                            (Dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Fifty-Two        Fifty-Three      One Hundred
                                                               Week Period       Week Period     Fifty-Five Day
                                                                  Ended             Ended         Period Ended
                                                              July 1, 2000      July 3, 1999     June 27, 1998
                                                            --------------    --------------     --------------
<S>                                                         <C>               <C>                <C>
Adjusted Earnings
Loss before income taxes...............................     $      (20,337)   $      (22,140)    $      (40,690)  (b)
Portion of rent representative of interest.............                277               216                 60
Interest on indebtedness...............................             31,907            27,793             11,571
                                                            --------------    --------------     --------------
     Total earnings (loss) as adjusted.................             11,847             5,869            (29,059)
                                                            --------------    --------------     --------------
Fixed Charges
Portion of rent representative of interest.............                277               216                 60
Interest on indebtedness...............................             31,907            27,793             11,571
                                                            --------------    --------------     --------------
  Total fixed charges..................................             32,184            28,009             11,631
                                                            --------------    --------------     --------------
Deficiency of earnings.................................     $      (20,337)   $      (22,140)    $      (40,690)
                                                            ==============    ==============     ==============
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (a).................                 --                --                 --
                                                            ==============    ==============     ==============
</TABLE>


(a)  As earnings for the fifty-two week period ended July 1, 2000, the fifty-
     three week period ended July 3, 1999 and the one hundred fifty-five day
     period ended June 27, 1998 were inadequate to cover fixed charges, a ratio
     of earnings to fixed charges for the period has not been presented. The
     deficiency of earnings to fixed charges was approximately $20.3 million,
     $22.1 million and $40.7 million, respectively.

(b) Reflects the nonrecurring in-process research and development write-off of
    $23.9 million.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 12, 2012

h1009

Order 

October 12, 2012

145917 & (20)

ROBERT DAVIS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 145917

COA: 312064

JOYCE PARKER,

Respondent-Appellee.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the September 14, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals 

is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2000 AND FOR THE PERIOD
FROM JANUARY 1, 2000 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 25, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THE REGISTRANT ADOPTED LIQUIDATION
BASIS ACCOUNTING ON SEPTEMBER 26, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-25-2000
<CASH>                                           5,726
<SECURITIES>                                    16,446
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,647
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          21,090
<DEPRECIATION>                                     493
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,115
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,269
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,708
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,398
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,788
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,396
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,948<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,948<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,948<F1>
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
<FN>
<F1>Includes gains and losses associated with asset dispositions.
</FN>


</TABLE>