6184 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2000 / Notices

I thoroughly reviewed the entire

discussion of nuclear propulsion

radiologcal issues in the EIS, including

classified information not releasable to

the public. I am convinced that there are

no significant radiological impacts

associated with creating and utilizing

home port capacity at any of the three

locations affected by this decision. As

there are no significant radiological

impacts, mitigation measures such as

installation of a perimeter monitoring

system or disputing of potassium iodide

are not warranted.

Conclusion

On behalf of the Department of Navy,

I have decided to implement Alternative

Two, as set out in the FEIS, for

development of home port capacity for

CVNs within the U.S. Pacific Fleet AOR.

In selecting where to create home port

capacity for the two CVNs programmed

to replace existing CV assets within the

U.S. Pacific Fleet, I considered how the

development of home port capacity as

set out in each alternative analyzed in

the EIS would affect: (1) Operations and

training, crew quality of life, and the

CVN maintenance program; (2) the

environment; and (3) facility and

infrastructure life cycle costs. I took a

hard look at the environmental impacts

analyzed in the EIS and gave careful

consideration to the comments received

on the DEIS and FEIS.

After weighing all of these factors, I

have determined that Alternative Two,

the preferred alternative in the FEIS,

best serves the interests of the DON

while keeping environmental impacts at

a less than significant level. Alternative

Two satisfies the operational, training,

and maintenance requirements of the

Pacific Fleet, provides acceptable

quality of life for Navy sailors and their

families, causes no significant

environmental impacts, and entails

manageable facility and infrastructure

costs.

Dated: January 28, 2000.

Duncan Holaday,

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy

(Installations and Facilities).

[FR Doc. 00–2831 Filed 2–7–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810–FF–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive

Patent License; Virotek, LLC

AGENCY: Department of the Navy.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy

hereby gives notice of its intent to grant

to Virotek, LLC, a revocable,

nonassignable, exclusive license to

practice worldwide the Governmentowned inventions described in U.S.

Patent No. 6,015,681 issued 18 January

2000, and its PCT serial No. 96/12135,

filed 12 Dec 1996, entitled ‘‘Rapid

Immunoassay for Cariogenic Baceria’’;

and U.S. Patent Serial No. 90/44214,

filed on 3 Aug 1999 and its PCT serial

No. 99/10482 filed on 3 Aug 1999,

entitled ‘‘Rapid Immunoassay to Detect

Infection with Mycobacterium

tuberculosis’’ in the field of Rapid,

Hand-held Salivary Diagnostics for

Streptococcus mutans, lactobacillus and

Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

DATE: Anyone wishing to object to the

grant of this license must file written

objections along with supporting

evidence, if any, not later than April 10,

2000. Written objections are to be filed

with the Office of Technology Transfer,

Naval Medical Research Center, 8901

Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD 20889–

5607, telephone (301) 319–7428.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CDR

Charles Schlagel, MSC, USN, Director,

Office of Technology Transfer, Naval

Medical Research Center, 503 Robert

Grant Avenue, Silver Spring, MD

20910–7500, telephone (301) 319–7428.

Dated: January 27, 2000.

J.L. Roth,

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate

General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register

Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 00–2728 Filed 2–7–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3812–FF–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy

Privacy Act of 1974; System of

Records

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to amend record system.

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy

proposes to amend six systems of

records notices in its inventory of record

systems subject to the Privacy Act of

1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: The amendments will be

effective on March 9, 2000, unless

comments are received that would

result in a contrary determination.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the

Department of the Navy, PA/FOIA

Policy Branch, Chief of Naval

Operations (N09B30), 2000 Navy

Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350-2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs.

Doris Lama at (202) 685-6545 or DSN

325-6545.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Department of the Navy’s record system

notices for records systems subject to

the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a),

as amended, have been published in the

Federal Register and are available from

the address above.

The Department of the Navy proposes

to amend six systems of records notices

in its inventory of record systems

subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5

U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The changes

to the systems of records are not within

the purview of subsection (r) of the

Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as

amended, which requires the

submission of new or altered systems

reports. The records systems being

amended are set forth below, as

amended, published in their entirety.

Dated: February 2, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

N01070-1

SYSTEM NAME:

JAG Corps Officer Personnel

Information (February 22, 1993, 58 FR

10694).

CHANGES:

* * * * *

SYSTEM LOCATION:

Delete entry and replace with ‘Office

of the Judge Advocate General (Code

61), Department of the Navy,

Washington Navy Yard, 1322 Patterson

Avenue SE, Suite 3000, Washington, DC

20374-5066.’

* * * * *

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE

SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND

THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:

In paragraph 2, delete ‘a semi-annual’

and replace with ‘an annual’.

* * * * *

N01070-1

SYSTEM NAME:

JAG Corps Officer Personnel

Information.

SYSTEM LOCATION:

Office of the Judge Advocate General

(Code 61), Department of the Navy,

Washington Navy Yard, 1322 Patterson

Avenue SE, Suite 3000, Washington, DC

20374-5066.