alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 351 

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 23, 2013 

Mr. ROE of Tennessee (for himself, Ms. SCHWARTZ, Mr. BENISHEK, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mrs. BLACK, 

Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. 

BURGESS, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. CHABOT, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, 

Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. DAINES, Mr. 

DENHAM, Mr. DENT, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. 

FINCHER, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. 

GERLACH, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. GOWDY, 

Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas, Mr. GRIFFITH of Virginia, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. 

HANNA, Mr. HARPER, Mr. HARRIS, Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. HECK of Nevada, Mr. HUELSKAMP, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. JONES, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. LANCE, Mr. LATHAM, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, 

Mr. LONG, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. MATHESON, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. 

MEEHAN, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. MULVANEY, Mr. MURPHY of 

Pennsylvania, Mr. NUGENT, Mr. OLSON, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. 

PETRI, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. POMPEO, Mr. POSEY, Mr. PRICE of Georgia, Mr. REED, Mrs. ROBY, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Mr. ROKITA, Mr. 

ROSKAM, Mr. SCHOCK, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. SMITH of 

Texas, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. TIBERI, 

Mr. WALBERG, Mr. WALDEN, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. WENSTRUP, 

Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. WOMACK, and 

Mr. YOUNG of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees 

on Energy and Commerce and Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 351 IH

A BILL 

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Seniors’ 

5 Access to Medicare Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE INDEPENDENT PAYMENT ADVI7 SORY BOARD. 

8 Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protec9 tion and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148), sec10 tions 3403 and 10320 of such Act (including the amend11 ments made by such sections) are repealed, and any provi12 sion of law amended by such sections is hereby restored 

13 as if such sections had not been enacted into law. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with
V 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3503 

To authorize the award of the Distinguished Service Cross to Robert L. 

Towles for acts of valor during the Vietnam War. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2013 

Mr. RYAN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the award of the Distinguished Service Cross 

to Robert L. Towles for acts of valor during the Vietnam 

War. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR AWARD OF THE DISTIN4 GUISHED SERVICE CROSS TO SPECIALIST 

5 FOUR ROBERT L. TOWLES FOR ACTS OF 

6 VALOR DURING THE VIETNAM WAR. 

7 (a) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwith8 standing the time limitations specified in section 3744 of 

9 title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation 

10 with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3503 IH

1 who served in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the 

2 Army may award the Distinguished Service Cross under 

3 section 3742 of that title to Robert L. Towles for the acts 

4 of valor referred to in subsection (b). 

5 (b) ACTION DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred 

6 to in subsection (a) are the actions of Specialist Four Rob7 ert L. Towles, on November 17, 1965, as a member of 

8 the United States Army serving in the grade of Specialist 

9 Four during the Vietnam War while serving in Company 

10 D, 2d Battalion, 7th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division, for 

11 which he was originally awarded the Bronze Star with ‘‘V’’ 

12 Device. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130368 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130368 

 COA: 256437 

Wayne CC: 01-000227

JEROME R. WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

t0522 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2006 

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 215 (Monday, November 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28379]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. GT01-3-000]


El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Cancellation of Tariff 
Sheet

October 31, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 25, 2000, El Paso Natural Gas Company 
(El Paso) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 1, with an effective date 
of November 25, 2000. El Paso states that this tariff sheet is being 
filed to cancel its sales tariff.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Beginning November 1, 2000, comments and protests may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28379 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 2:22-cv-00022-Z Document 7 Filed 04/13/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 23
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

Frances Leyva, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Equifax Information Services LLC, et al., 

 Defendants. 

CIVIL FILE NO.: 3:22-779-B 

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE 

ORDER 

Based on the STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE filed by the parties 

herein, this Court hereby orders that the Complaint against the Defendant Servis One, Inc. d/b/a 

BSI Financial Services ONLY shall be, and herewith is, dismissed with prejudice without costs, 

or disbursements, or attorneys’ fees to either Plaintiff or Defendant Servis One, Inc. d/b/a BSI 

Financial Services. 

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. 

 BY THE COURT: 

Dated: _____________________ __________________________________ 

 JUDGE, United States District Court 

Case 3:22-cv-00779-B Document 74-1 Filed 03/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 386
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § 2:22-CR-00026-Z-BR

§

JOSE MIGUEL QUINTERO-ZAVALA (2) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

JOSE MIGUEL QUINTERO-ZAVALA (2), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 

(5th Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 2 of the 

Indictment. After cautioning and examining JOSE MIGUEL QUINTERO-ZAVALA (2) under oath concerning each of the 

subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense 

charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore 

recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that JOSE MIGUEL QUINTERO-ZAVALA (2) be adjudged guilty of 

21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C) - POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE METHAMPHETAMINE and

have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge,

☒ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released.

Date: July 8, 2022

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Case 2:22-cr-00026-Z-BR Document 72 Filed 07/08/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 170
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Stratus Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies,
to such officer’s knowledge:



(1) This Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2013 (“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



| | Date: April 14, 2014          
| | ------------------------------
| |                               
| | /s/ Stephen M. Simes          
| |                               
| | Name: Stephen M. Simes        
| |                               
| | Title: Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### GUELDA et al. v. HAYS & NICOULIN, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 7, 1954.

Thomas C. Carroll, and Greenebaum, Barnett & Carroll, Louisville, for appellants.

Robert P. Hobson and Woodward, Hob-son & Fulton, Louisville, for appellee.

COMBS, Justice.

The question is whether the attractive nuisance doctrine is applicable to the facts of this case.

Charles Guelda, Jr., a 12-year-o'ld boy, slipped and broke his leg on the muddy basement floor of a building under construction by the appellee. Charles was attending a church picnic being held on the grounds of St. Matthias Church in Louisville. The appellee was engaged, under contract with the St. Matthias 'Church, in the construction of a school building on the premises. The picnic area was adjacent to the partially completed building. After the picnic supper, Charles decided to join some of the other boys who were playing inside -the building. He climbed through a ground-level basement window and in stepping down to the dirt floor two feet below slipped and broke his leg. The accident occurred about 8 p. m., daylight saving time, and the parties do not agree whether it was still light enough to see. The trial court directed a verdict for the defendant.

It is conceded by the appellant that the case should be affirmed unless the attractive nuisance doctrine applies. This doctrine is firmly established in this state but the court in recent years has shown no inclination to extend .it. Goss v. Shawnee Post No. 3204, V. F. W., Ky., 265 S.W.2d 799; Bates v. Caudill, Ky., 255 S.W.2d 487.

In Restatement, Negligence, section 339, four requisites are listed as necessary to invoke the application of the attractive nuisance doctrine: (a) The place where the condition is maintained is "one upon which the possessor knows or should know that such children are likely to trespass'; (b) the condition is One of which the possessor knows or should know and which he realizes or should realize as involving an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily harm to such children; (c) the children because of their youth do not discover the condition or realize the risk involved in in-termeddling, in it or in coming within the area made dangerous by it; (d) the utility to the possessor of maintaining the condition is slight as compared to the risk to young children involved therein.

There is a division of authority on whether a building under construction' *936is a structure falling within the attractive nuisance doctrine and we have found no Kentucky case on the point. But we do not consider it necessary to decide that question here. Even if it should be conceded that the factors listed above under (a) (c) and (d) are present, we are of the opinion that factor (b) is absent. We do not think it can be said that a muddy basement floor, two feet from the ground level, in a partially constructed building, constitutes an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily harm to children who might be •attracted to the building.

We find no merit in the incidental questions raised in appellants’ brief.

The judgment is affirmed.
VIC E PRESIDEN T PR O TEMPOR E CHAIRMA N ENERG Y & TELECOMMUNICATION S COMMITTE E MEMBE R CRIM E VICTIMS
. CRIM E & CORRECTIO N

EDUCATIO N ENVIRONMENTA L CONSERVATIO N HIGHE R EDUCATIO N RULE S TRANSPORTATIO N TH E SENAT E STAT E O F NE W YOR K

GEORG E D . MAZIAR Z Senator , 62n d Distric t ALBAN Y OFFICE : l\l T n C ROO M 708 I • < ! ^ luGGISLATIV E OFFIC E BUILDIN G ALSANV.N V 1224

7 1518)455-202 4 !rAX.|5l8 l 426-698 7 

### ? 2 A DISTRIC T OFFICE :

I75WALNU T STREE T SUITE D J=ORT
. N

Y 1 •J0<) 4 (716 1 434-068 0 FA X 17161434-329 7 E-MAIL ADDRESS : maziarzfi^'nysenate.go v

Office of Aviatio n Analysi s Jul y 28,201 1
3t h 8'"Floor,RoomW86-31 0 120 0 New Jerse y Ave. , S E Washington , DC 2059 0 T o Who mi t Ma y Concern , I a mwritin g i n stron g suppor

t o f th e NiagaraCount

y Cente r fo r Economi c Developmen

t (NCCED ) applicatio n t

o the U S Departmen

t o f Transportatio n Small Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen

t Progra m(SCASDP) , Th e NCCE

D propose s t

o reques t financial assistanc e t

o help enhanc e ai r servic e operation s an

d marketin g o f

th e NiagaraFall s Internationa l Airpor t (NFIA) . Th e NFI A i s a n attractiv e alternativ e to currently congeste dmajo r Nort h America n internationa

l airports
. Wit

h it s 10,825 ft. main" runway , 24-hou r operatio n (n o curfews) , 24-hou r operation s services , excellen t acces s t o inspectio n a^encieS v and
. pric e competitiv e landin g fees , th e NFI A i s ideally suite d ari

d strategiCatl

y locate dto accommodat

e variou s type s o

f aviatio n

. operation s suite d fo

r busines s and leisur

e use . Th e clos e prbxin\it

y o f the airpor t t o th e Canada/US A border , it s locatio n jus t of f amajo r hig h wky , an dit s centra

l locatio n t o th e Canad a an d US A populatio n bas e offe r grea t economi c advantages
. Significan t development s an

d investment s hav e been mad e a t th e airport
. Thi s ha s stimulate d privat

e investmen

t throughout

th e communit

y an dha s secure dadditiona

l transportatio n opportunities
. Gran t fundin g fro mth e SCASD

P i s neededt

o ensur e tha t thes e ne w development s continu e to grow . The loca l stakeholde

r communit y caimo t completel y fun dtheir marketin g airpor

t initiative s an

d provide incentive s to entic e additiona l airlin e carriers
. Federa

l assistanc e i s needed to complet e thi s importan

t task
. A SCASDP awar

dwil l hel p expandth e airport' s existence , brin g greate r involvemen

t to th e communit

y whil e enhancing economi c competiveness
. I a mconfiden

t tha t th e NCCfiD ^an t

requesfwil V greatly iniprov e qualit

y o f lif e throughou t Western-New^Yor

k and-act a s atnodel initiativ e tha

t coul dassis t

futur e airline s to.

- inves t throughou t ou r ctommuriitytliai

r benefit s stakeHoldeii s an

dto.uris t to-ou r region , • ;•• • - . • , - f

' • ' • ' •

• • [more]

^ >I ask tha t thi s gran t applicatio n b e giv e ver

y carefu l consideration
. Than

k you fo r you r tim e an d attentio n to thi s matter . Sincerely , Georg e Maziar

z ^—-

^ Senator , 62"' ' Distric t
#### WARE v. STATE.

No. 22972.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 6, 1944.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 24, 1945.

Wm. E. Davenport, of San Angelo, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is robbery. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

There is but one question in this case which requires our attention, and it relates to the insufficiency of , the evidence to meet the descriptive averments of the property claimed to have been taken. It was charged in the indictment, omitting the formal parts thereof, that “on or about the 26th day of February, A.D., 1943, and anterior to the presentment of this indictment, in the County and State aforesaid, Curtis Ware did, then and there unlawfully in and upon J. S. Schooley, did make an assault; and did then and there, by the said assault, and by violence to the said J. S. Schooley, and by putting the said J. S. Schooley in fear of life and bodily injury, fraudulently, and without the consent of the said J. S. Schooley, take from the person and possession of him, the said J. S. Schooley, one ‘gold’ watch”, etc.

We have read the record with great care but do not find any evidence that the watch alleged to have been taken from Schooley was a “gold” watch. Consequently, the proof in this case fails to meet the descriptive allegations of the property as charged in the indictment. It is a well-settled rule in this state that although the property is described with unnecessary particularity, it is incumbent upon the State to prove the descriptive allegations as charged. See Coffelt v. State, 27 Tex.App. 608, 11 S.W. 639, 11 Am.St.Rep. 205; Loyd v. State, 22 Tex.App. 646, 3 S.W. 670; Early v. State, 56 Tex.Cr.R. 61, 118 S.W. 1036; Tucker v. State, 59 Tex.Cr.R. 291, 128 S.W. 617; Robinson v. State, 60 Tex.Cr.R. 592, 132 S.W. 944.

For the error herein pointed out, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
# AGENCY:

 Bureau of Land Management, Interior, Northwest California Resource Advisory Council, Redding, California.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

 Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committees Act (Public Law 92-463) and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579), the U.S. Bureau of Land Management's Northwest California Resource Advisory Council will meet Thursday and Friday, March 30 and 31, 2000, for a business meeting and field tour. The meeting and tour are open to the public, but anyone attending must provide their own transportation and lunch.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 The meeting begins at 10 a.m. Thursday, March 30, at the Bureau of Land Management's Redding Field Office, 355 Hemsted Drive, Redding, CA. The members will depart immediately for a tour of public lands managed by the BLM's Redding Field Office. On Friday, March 31, the business meeting begins at 8 a.m. in the Conference Room of the Redding Field Office. Agenda items include an update on the Headwaters Forest, the status of the Redding Resource Management Plan amendment process, a status report on recovery from the Lowden Fire, and a status report on a management feasibility study for the Lake Berryessa region.

Time will be set aside for public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to speak, a time limit may be established.

# FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Lynda J. Roush, BLM Arcata Field Manager, at (707) 825-2300.

Joseph J. Fontana,

Public Affairs Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-2829 Filed 2-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-40-P