alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mary NAPIER, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 12, 1951.

Burnis Martin, Prestonsburg, for mov-ant.

J. C. Cornett, Commonwealth’s Atty., Hindman, A. E. Funk, Atty. Gen., Zeb A. Stewart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the Commonwealth, opposed.

PER 'CURIAM.

Appeal denied. Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements of PDI, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-61231  and  333-60512) of our
report dated March 3, 2004, except for Note 1B, as to which the date is November
3, 2004, relating to the financial  statements and financial statement schedule,
which appears in this Form 10-K/A.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Florham Park, NJ
November 3, 2004
#### SISK v. STATE.

No. 25348.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 13, 1951.

W. M. Tucker, Wellington, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for the sale of liquor with a fine of $250 imposed in the judgment in consequence of a jury verdict.

The evidence is sufficient to sustain the jury’s finding that appellant sold a pint of liquor at his home, during the night, for a consideration of $4.

The question raised by the brief and argument of appellant in this case attacks the validity of the judgment on the ground that it is based on an indefinite and uncertain verdict of the jury. The question presented is quite novel and would justify a lengthy discussion if the facts of the case otherwise supported the verdict. We have come to the conclusion, however, that the facts are insufficient.

The complaint and information allege that the sale was made in a dry county, the result of an election the returns of which had been in favor of prohibition, that the canvass was made of the returns, the results declared and all subsequent orders thereto had been entered. This is in accordance with law. We note, however, that the only proof offered on the subject was by the County Clerk who produced Vol. 3 of the Commissioners Court Minutes of Collingsworth County and testified therefrom that beginning on page 193 of the book it is shown that an election was held on June 28th, 1913, to determine whether or not intoxicating liquor should be sold in said county; in said record it is shown “that such election returns were canvassed, and the results of the election declared. The result of the canvass of the returns shows that there were 392 for prohibition and 113 against prohibition.” There is no proof of any subsequent orders, or action of the court whatsoever, having been made.

Judge Graves said, in Brown v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 3, 117 S.W.2d 107, 108, in very positive and concise language, that proof of all facts alleged necessary to the conviction must be made by the state. We *771quote: “There is no way that we can know whether or not the sale of intoxicating liquor has been prohibited in certain localities except from proof thereof, and we have repeatedly held that it is necessary not only to allege by proper averments the calling of an election to determine such question, its result and the necessary orders thereafter, but also to prove such matters, in order that it might be shown that such an area was a dry area. See Humphreys v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 383, 99 S.W.2d 600; Green v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 552, 101 S.W.2d 241; Cunningham v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 63, 102 S.W.2d 413; Stewart v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 79, 102 S.W.2d 416; Baldridge v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 590, 106 S.W.2d 700.”

Because of the failure of the proof to sustain the allegation, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.
| (1)    |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
| (2)    |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |   |   |

|                                                   |                                                                                                           |                               |
|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| Date: March      16, 2009     | By:                                                                                                  |  /s/      Frank E. Verdecanna |
|                                                   | Frank      E. VerdecannaVice President      and Chief Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer) |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS CONTAINS SUMMARY RESTATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1996
<CASH>                                       8,483,071
<SECURITIES>                                 8,888,905
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,143,286
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,116,507)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,448,085
<PP&E>                                       6,044,704
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,903,142)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,403,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,580,286
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        80,686
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,653,664
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,403,252
<SALES>                                      3,218,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,218,742
<CGS>                                        2,115,373
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,115,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,267,188
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,966,585)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,966,585)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.66)
        

</TABLE>
#### WOODS v. STATE.

No. 23612.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 5, 1947.

Cunningham & Boling, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The unlawful possession of whisky for the purpose of sale in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $500.

Peace officers, operating by virtue of a search warrant, searched the bedroom of appellant and her husband and found therein a case or twenty-four pint bottles of whisky. Appellant was present at the time of the search; the husband was not.

Appellant did not testify as a witness, nor did she offer any affirmative defense.

A bill of exception, approved without qualification, certifies — among other things —that State’s counsel, in his opening argument to the jury, said: “the defendant has in no wise attempted to show you gentlemen for what purpose Elizabeth Woods had that whiskey in her possession.”

Appellant objected to that argument as being a comment upon her failure to testify.

There is no testimony showing or indicating that the argument could have referred to some other witness.

The argument was subject to the objection urged and in violation of Art. 710, C. C.P. See, also, Smith v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 322, 98 S.W.2d 806; Hardrick v. State, 142 Tex.Cr.R. 520, 155 S.W.2d 367.

For the error pointed out, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The.foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
10-QSB Sept. 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           22,671
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 22,671
<PP&E>                                            9,965
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   37,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           654,239
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              2
<OTHER-SE>                                     (616,461)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     37,780
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    707
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                398,864
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               30,683
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (428,840)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (428,840)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (428,840)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (5.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 163 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 163

 Concerning the release of the American hostages in Somalia and United 
                    States Armed Forces withdrawal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1993

   Mr. Camp submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Concerning the release of the American hostages in Somalia and United 
                    States Armed Forces withdrawal.

Whereas the goal in sending United States Armed Forces to Somalia, to allow food 
        to reach the starving, has been accomplished;
Whereas on May 4, 1993, the United Nations assumed oversight of peacekeeping 
        operations in Somalia;
Whereas 4,700 United States Armed Forces personnel have been deployed to Somalia 
        under Operation Restore Hope since December 1992, and 27 Americans have 
        been killed while serving there;
Whereas American servicemen are currently being detained against their will as 
        hostages in Somalia; and
Whereas United States Armed Forces should be withdrawn from Somalia as safely 
        and expeditiously as possible: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the President should obtain 
the release of the members of the United States Armed Forces who are 
hostages in Somalia and prepare a plan for the immediate withdrawal of 
United States Armed Forces from Somalia.

                                 <all>
```
October 6, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JAMES C. SMITH, Appellant

NO. 14-16-00345-CV V.

RESOURCE ONE CREDIT UNION, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on April 12, 2016. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, James C. Smith.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 OF GUINNESS TELLI*PHONE CORPORATION.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,942
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,942
<PP&E>                                          71,431
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,945
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,957,488
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,635
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,945,695)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,428
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               308,038
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              72,708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (380,746)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (380,746)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (380,746)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 117 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 117

 Relating to improved United States-Mexico cooperation in controlling 
                          illegal immigration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 1993

  Mr. Lehman (for himself, Mr. Stark, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Gallegly, Mrs. 
   Morella, Mr. Sarpalius, Ms. Kaptur, and Mr. Canady) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Relating to improved United States-Mexico cooperation in controlling 
                          illegal immigration.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress strongly urges the President to take such action as 
may be necessary to ensure that the current North American free trade 
area negotiations on labor matters adequately address the issue of 
improved bilateral cooperation between Mexico and the United States on 
controlling illegal immigration.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                    AVE, INC.
  (pursuant to section 78.385 and 78.390 of the Nevada General Corporation Law)



1.   The name of the corporation is AVE, INC.

2.   The articles have been amended as follows:

     Article One of the Articles of Incorporation is deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following new Article One:




                                  "Article One:

                 The name of the Corporation is CYCO.NET, INC."

3.   The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation
     entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such
     greater proportion of the voting power as maybe required in the case of a
     vote by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the
     articles of incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is:
     11,752,000.

4.   Signatures:


/s/ RICHARD A. URREA                              /s/ DANIEL R. URREA
---------------------------                       -----------------------------
Richard A. Urrea, President                       Daniel R. Urrea, Secretary

State of New Mexico     )
County of Bernalillo    )

     This instrument was acknowledged before me, a notary public, on July 28,
1999, by Richard A. Urrea as President of AVE, Inc., a Nevada corporation.




                                                  Notary Public
My commission expires:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-125-X

§

JOSE GILBERTO PEREZ VASQUEZ (1) §

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of 

Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of 

the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of 

service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the 

Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is 

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and JOSE GILBERTO 

PEREZ VASQUEZ (1) is hereby adjudged guilty of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) – Illegal Reentry After Removal 

from the United States. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

 The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court adopts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing 

evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who 

set the conditions of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the 

defendant is likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under 

§ 3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination 

of whether it has been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) 

why the defendant should not be detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by 

clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This matter shall be referred to the 

United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

Signed this 23rd day of September, 2022.

________________________________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cr-00125-X Document 23 Filed 09/23/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 38
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
       
<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                          APR-30-1996
<CASH>                                                39,358
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         18,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                          198,666
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     259,129
<PP&E>                                               151,046
<DEPRECIATION>                                        25,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       385,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                141,298
<BONDS>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                               3,287
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                           240,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         385,043
<SALES>                                               46,508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      46,508
<CGS>                                                 31,663
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        268,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       5,450
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     3,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (258,912)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (258,912)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
        

</TABLE>