H. R. 3304 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen 

An Act 

To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, 

and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2014’’. 

SEC. 2. ORGANIZATION OF ACT INTO DIVISIONS; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 

(a) DIVISIONS.—This Act is organized into four divisions as 

follows: 

(1) Division A—Department of Defense Authorizations. 

(2) Division B—Military Construction Authorizations. 

(3) Division C—Department of Energy National Security 

Authorizations and Other Authorizations. 

(4) Division D—Funding Tables. 

(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for this Act 

is as follows: 

Sec. 1. Short title. 

Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents. 

Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees. 

Sec. 4. Explanatory statement. 

DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS 

TITLE I—PROCUREMENT 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations. 

Subtitle B—Army Programs 

Sec. 111. Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker vehicle program. 

Sec. 112. Study on multiyear, multivehicle procurement authority for tactical vehicles. 

Subtitle C—Navy Programs 

Sec. 121. CVN–78 class aircraft carrier program. 

Sec. 122. Repeal of requirements relating to procurement of future surface combatants. 

Sec. 123. Multiyear procurement authority for E–2D aircraft program. 

Sec. 124. Limitation on availability of funds for Littoral Combat Ship. 

Subtitle D—Air Force Programs 

Sec. 131. Repeal of requirement for maintenance of certain retired KC–135E aircraft. 

Sec. 132. Multiyear procurement authority for C–130J aircraft. 
H. R. 3304—2 

Sec. 133. Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics modernization program for C–130 aircraft. 

Sec. 134. Prohibition of procurement of unnecessary C–27J aircraft by the Air 

Force. 

Subtitle E—Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters 

Sec. 141. Personal protection equipment procurement. 

Sec. 142. Repeal of certain F–35 reporting requirements. 

Sec. 143. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RQ–4 Global Hawk 

unmanned aircraft systems and A–10 aircraft. 

Sec. 144. MC–12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance aircraft. 

Sec. 145. Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle providers. 

Sec. 146. Reports on personal protection equipment and health and safety risks associated with ejection seats. 

TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations. 

Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations 

Sec. 211. Modification of requirements on biennial strategic plan for the Defense 

Advanced Research Projects Agency. 

Sec. 212. Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat vehicle engineering 

and manufacturing phase. 

Sec. 213. Limitation and reporting requirements for unmanned carrier-launched 

surveillance and strike system program. 

Sec. 214. Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force logistics transformation. 

Sec. 215. Limitation on availability of funds for defensive cyberspace operations of 

the Air Force. 

Sec. 216. Limitation on availability of funds for precision extended range munition 

program. 

Sec. 217. Long-range standoff weapon requirement; prohibition on availability of 

funds for noncompetitive procedures for offensive anti-surface warfare 

weapon contracts of the Navy. 

Sec. 218. Review of software development for F–35 aircraft. 

Sec. 219. Evaluation and assessment of the distributed common ground system. 

Sec. 220. Operationally responsive space. 

Sec. 221. Sustainment or replacement of Blue Devil intelligence, surveillance, and 

reconnaissance capabilities. 

Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs 

Sec. 231. Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on ballistic missile defense system. 

Sec. 232. Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program. 

Sec. 233. Prohibition on availability of funds for integration of certain missile defense systems; report on regional ballistic missile defense. 

Sec. 234. Availability of funds for co-production of Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system in the United States. 

Sec. 235. Additional missile defense radar for the protection of the United States 

homeland. 

Sec. 236. Evaluation of options for future ballistic missile defense sensor architectures. 

Sec. 237. Plans to improve the ground-based midcourse defense system. 

Sec. 238. Report on potential future homeland ballistic missile defense options. 

Sec. 239. Briefings on status of implementation of certain missile defense matters. 

Sec. 240. Sense of Congress and report on NATO and missile defense burden-sharing. 

Sec. 241. Sense of Congress on deployment of regional ballistic missile defense capabilities. 

Sec. 242. Sense of Congress on procurement of capability enhancement II 

exoatmospheric kill vehicle. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

Sec. 251. Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program. 

Sec. 252. Annual Comptroller General of the United States report on the acquisition program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter. 

Sec. 253. Report on strategy to improve body armor. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Sec. 261. Establishment of Communications Security Review and Advisory Board. 
H. R. 3304—3 

Sec. 262. Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds for defense laboratories for research and development of technologies for military missions. 

Sec. 263. Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced technology achievements. 

Sec. 264. Five-year extension of pilot program to include technology protection features during research and development of certain defense systems. 

Sec. 265. Briefing on biometrics activities of the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 266. Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common missile compartment of Ohio-class replacement program with the United Kingdom’s 

Vanguard successor program. 

Sec. 267. Sense of Congress on counter-electronics high power microwave missile 

project. 

TITLE III—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding. 

Subtitle B—Energy and Environment 

Sec. 311. Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets for activities relating to operational energy strategy. 

Sec. 312. Facilitation of interagency cooperation in conservation programs of the 

Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and Interior to avoid or reduce adverse impacts on military readiness activities. 

Sec. 313. Reauthorization of Sikes Act. 

Sec. 314. Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in open-air burn pits. 

Sec. 315. Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of drop-in fuels. 

Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment 

Sec. 321. Strategic policy for prepositioned materiel and equipment. 

Sec. 322. Department of Defense manufacturing arsenal study and report. 

Sec. 323. Consideration of Army arsenals’ capabilities to fulfill manufacturing requirements. 

Sec. 324. Strategic policy for the retrograde, reconstitution, and replacement of operating forces used to support overseas contingency operations. 

Sec. 325. Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan. 

Sec. 326. Strategy for improving asset tracking and in-transit visibility. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

Sec. 331. Additional reporting requirements relating to personnel and unit readiness. 

Sec. 332. Modification of authorities on prioritization of funds for equipment readiness and strategic capability. 

Sec. 333. Revision to requirement for annual submission of information regarding 

information technology capital assets. 

Sec. 334. Modification of annual corrosion control and prevention reporting requirements. 

Subtitle E—Limitations and Extensions of Authority 

Sec. 341. Certification for realignment of forces at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores. 

Sec. 342. Limitation on performance of Department of Defense flight demonstration 

teams outside the United States. 

Sec. 343. Limitation on funding for United States Special Operations Command 

National Capital Region. 

Sec. 344. Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional Web Initiative. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Sec. 351. Gifts made for the benefit of military musical units. 

Sec. 352. Revised policy on ground combat and camouflage utility uniforms. 

TITLE IV—MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS 

Subtitle A—Active Forces 

Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces. 

Sec. 402. Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels and in 

annual limitation on certain end strength reductions. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Forces 

Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve. 
H. R. 3304—4 

Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the reserves. 

Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status). 

Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians. 

Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty 

for operational support. 

Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 421. Military personnel. 

TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY 

Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy Generally 

Sec. 501. Congressional notification requirements related to increases in number of 

general and flag officers on active duty or in joint duty assignments. 

Sec. 502. Service credit for cyberspace experience or advanced education upon original appointment as a commissioned officer. 

Sec. 503. Selective early retirement authority for regular officers and selective 

early removal of officers from reserve active-status list. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management 

Sec. 511. Suicide prevention efforts for members of the reserve components. 

Sec. 512. Removal of restrictions on the transfer of officers between the active and 

inactive National Guard. 

Sec. 513. Limitations on cancellations of deployment of certain reserve component 

units and involuntary mobilizations of certain Reserves. 

Sec. 514. Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve component general 

and flag officers in an active status. 

Sec. 515. Feasibility of establishing a unit of the National Guard in American 

Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 

Subtitle C—General Service Authorities 

Sec. 521. Provision of information under Transition Assistance Program about disability-related employment and education protections. 

Sec. 522. Medical examination requirements regarding post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury before administrative separation. 

Sec. 523. Establishment and use of consistent definition of gender-neutral occupational standard for military career designators. 

Sec. 524. Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service Implementation Plan. 

Sec. 525. Provision of military service records to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

in an electronic format. 

Sec. 526. Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System. 

Subtitle D—Military Justice Matters, Other Than Sexual Assault Prevention and 

Response and Related Reforms 

Sec. 531. Modification of eligibility for appointment as Judge on the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 532. Enhancement of protection of rights of conscience of members of the 

Armed Forces and chaplains of such members. 

Sec. 533. Inspector General investigation of Armed Forces compliance with regulations for the protection of rights of conscience of members of the Armed 

Forces and their chaplains. 

Sec. 534. Survey of military chaplains views on Department of Defense policy regarding chaplain prayers outside of religious services. 

Subtitle E—Member Education and Training 

Sec. 541. Additional requirements for approval of educational programs for purposes of certain educational assistance under laws administered by the 

Secretary of Defense. 

Sec. 542. Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and training for military 

occupational specialties with skills and training required for civilian certifications and licenses. 

Sec. 543. Report on the Troops to Teachers program. 

Sec. 544. Secretary of Defense report on feasibility of requiring automatic operation 

of current prohibition on accrual of interest on direct student loans of 

certain members of the Armed Forces. 

Subtitle F—Defense Dependents’ Education and Military Family Readiness Matters 

Sec. 551. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit 

dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense 

civilian employees. 
H. R. 3304—5 

Sec. 552. Impact aid for children with severe disabilities. 

Sec. 553. Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual elementary and secondary education component of Department of Defense education program. 

Sec. 554. Family support programs for immediate family members of members of 

the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces. 

Sec. 555. Sense of Congress on parental rights of members of the Armed Forces in 

child custody determinations. 

Subtitle G—Decorations and Awards 

Sec. 561. Repeal of limitation on number of medals of honor that may be awarded 

to the same member of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 562. Standardization of time-limits for recommending and awarding Medal of 

Honor, Distinguished-Service Cross, Navy Cross, Air Force Cross, and 

Distinguished-Service Medal. 

Sec. 563. Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard 

Medal of Honor Roll requirements. 

Sec. 564. Prompt replacement of military decorations. 

Sec. 565. Review of eligibility for, and award of, Purple Heart to victims of the attacks at recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, and at Fort Hood, 

Texas. 

Sec. 566. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to former members of the 

Armed Forces previously recommended for award of the Medal of Honor. 

Sec. 567. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor for acts of valor during 

the Vietnam War. 

Sec. 568. Authorization for award of the Distinguished-Service Cross for acts of 

valor during the Korean and Vietnam Wars. 

Sec. 569. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to First Lieutenant Alonzo 

H. Cushing for acts of valor during the Civil War. 

Subtitle H—Other Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports 

Sec. 571. Report on feasibility of expanding performance evaluation reports to include 360-degree assessment approach. 

Sec. 572. Report on Department of Defense personnel policies regarding members 

of the Armed Forces with HIV or Hepatitis B. 

Sec. 573. Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of secondary 

schools. 

Sec. 574. Comptroller General report on use of determination of personality disorder or adjustment disorder as basis to separate members from the 

Armed Forces. 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

Sec. 581. Accounting for members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense 

civilian employees listed as missing and related reports. 

Sec. 582. Expansion of privileged information authorities to debriefing reports of 

certain recovered persons who were never placed in a missing status. 

Sec. 583. Revision of specified senior military colleges to reflect consolidation of 

North Georgia College and State University and Gainesville State College. 

Sec. 584. Review of security of military installations, including barracks, temporary 

lodging facilities, and multi-family residences. 

Sec. 585. Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army National Military 

Cemeteries. 

Sec. 586. Military salute during recitation of pledge of allegiance by members of the 

Armed Forces not in uniform and by veterans. 

Sec. 587. Improved climate assessments and dissemination of results. 

TITLE VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS 

Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances 

Sec. 601. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances. 

Sec. 602. Recognition of additional means by which members of the National Guard 

called into Federal service for a period of 30 days or less may initially 

report for duty for entitlement to basic pay. 

Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays 

Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve forces. 

Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health 

care professionals. 
H. R. 3304—6 

Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers. Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special 

pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities. 

Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays. 

Sec. 616. One-year extension of authority to provide incentive pay for members of 

precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language proficiency. 

Sec. 617. Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen enrolled in 

the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. 

Sec. 618. Health Professions Stipend Program to obtain commissioned officers in 

the reserve components. 

Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Allowances 

Sec. 621. Technical and standardizing amendments to Department of Defense travel and transportation authorities in connection with reform of such authorities. 

Subtitle D—Disability, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits 

Sec. 631. Clarification of prevention of retired pay inversion in the case of members 

whose retired pay is computed using high-three. 

Sec. 632. Periodic notice to members of the Ready Reserve on early retirement 

credit earned for significant periods of active Federal status or active 

duty. 

Sec. 633. Improved assistance for Gold Star spouses and other dependents. 

Subtitle E—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and 

Operations 

Sec. 641. Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities from reprisals. 

Sec. 642. Modernization of titles of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities for purposes of certain civil service laws. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Sec. 651. Authority to provide certain expenses for care and disposition of human 

remains that were retained by the Department of Defense for forensic 

pathology investigation. 

Sec. 652. Study of the merits and feasibility of providing transitional compensation 

and other transitional benefits to dependents of members separated for 

violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

TITLE VII—HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits 

Sec. 701. Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain beneficiaries enrolled 

in TRICARE Prime. 

Sec. 702. Mental health care treatment through telemedicine. 

Sec. 703. Comprehensive policy on improvements to care and transition of members 

of the Armed Forces with urotrauma. 

Sec. 704. Pilot program on investigational treatment of members of the Armed 

Forces for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder. 

Subtitle B—Health Care Administration 

Sec. 711. Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences to enter 

into contracts and agreements and make grants to other nonprofit entities. 

Sec. 712. Pilot program on increased third-party collection reimbursements in military medical treatment facilities. 

Sec. 713. Electronic health records of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 

Sec. 721. Display of budget information for embedded mental health providers of 

the reserve components. 

Sec. 722. Report on role of Department of Veterans Affairs in certain Centers of Excellence. 

Sec. 723. Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries. 

Sec. 724. Report on provision of advanced prosthetics and orthotics to members of 

the Armed Forces and veterans. 

Sec. 725. Comptroller General reports on TRICARE recovery audit program and 

availability of compounded pharmaceuticals. 
H. R. 3304—7 

TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND 

RELATED MATTERS 

Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management 

Sec. 801. Enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department of Defense laboratories. 

Sec. 802. Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available for contract 

services. 

Sec. 803. Identification and replacement of obsolete electronic parts. 

Subtitle B—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and 

Limitations 

Sec. 811. Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for contractor compensation. 

Sec. 812. Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in certain reports. 

Sec. 813. Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving suspension or debarment. 

Sec. 814. Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military purpose nondevelopmental items. 

Subtitle C—Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition Programs 

Sec. 821. Synchronization of cryptographic systems for major defense acquisition 

programs. Sec. 822. Assessment of dedicated ground control system before Milestone B approval of major defense acquisition programs constituting a space program. Sec. 823. Additional responsibility for product support managers for major weapon 

systems. Sec. 824. Comptroller General review of Department of Defense processes for the 

acquisition of weapon systems. 

Subtitle D—Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency Operations 

in Iraq or Afghanistan 

Sec. 831. Prohibition on contracting with the enemy. 

Sec. 832. Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan. 

TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT 

Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management 

Sec. 901. Revisions to composition of transition plan for defense business enterprise 

architecture. 

Sec. 902. Comptroller General report on potential relocation of Federal Government 

tenants onto military installations in the United States. Sec. 903. Clarification of authority for the command acquisition executive of the 

United States Special Operations Command. Sec. 904. Streamlining of Department of Defense management headquarters. 

Sec. 905. Update of statutory statement of functions of the Chairman of the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff relating to doctrine, training, and education. Sec. 906. Modification of reference to major Department of Defense headquarters 

activities instruction. 

Sec. 907. Personnel security. 

Subtitle B—Space Activities 

Sec. 911. National security space satellite reporting policy. 

Sec. 912. National security space defense and protection. 

Sec. 913. Space acquisition strategy. 

Sec. 914. Space control mission report. 

Sec. 915. Responsive launch. 

Sec. 916. Limitation on use of funds for Space Protection Program. 

Sec. 917. Eagle Vision system. 

Subtitle C—Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities 

Sec. 921. Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities. Sec. 922. Department of Defense intelligence priorities. 

Sec. 923. Defense Clandestine Service. 

Sec. 924. Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation. 

Subtitle D—Cyberspace-Related Matters 

Sec. 931. Modification of requirement for inventory of Department of Defense tactical data link systems. 
H. R. 3304—8 

Sec. 932. Authorities, capabilities, and oversight of the United States Cyber Command. 

Sec. 933. Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of Defense. 

Sec. 934. Modification of requirement for Report on Department of Defense 

Progress in Defending the Department and the Defense Industrial Base 

from Cyber Events. 

Sec. 935. Additional requirements relating to the software licenses of the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 936. Cyber outreach and threat awareness for small businesses. 

Sec. 937. Joint Federated Centers for Trusted Defense Systems for the Department 

of Defense. 

Sec. 938. Supervision of the acquisition of cloud computing capabilities. 

Sec. 939. Cyber vulnerabilities of Department of Defense weapon systems and tactical communications systems. 

Sec. 940. Control of the proliferation of cyber weapons. 

Sec. 941. Integrated policy to deter adversaries in cyberspace. 

Sec. 942. National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education matters. 

Subtitle E—Total Force Management 

Sec. 951. Reviews of appropriate manpower performance. 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—Financial Matters 

Sec. 1001. General transfer authority. 

Sec. 1002. Budgetary effects of this Act. 

Sec. 1003. Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 financial statements. 

Sec. 1004. Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization. 

Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities 

Sec. 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia. 

Sec. 1012. Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities. 

Sec. 1013. Extension and expansion of authority to provide additional support for 

counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments. 

Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards 

Sec. 1021. Modification of requirements for annual long-range plan for the construction of naval vessels. 

Sec. 1022. Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship donations at no cost 

to the Navy. 

Sec. 1023. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga class 

cruisers or dock landing ships. 

Sec. 1024. Extension and remediation of Navy contracting actions. 

Sec. 1025. Report comparing costs of DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III ships. 

Sec. 1026. Report on naval vessels and the Force Structure Assessment. 

Sec. 1027. Modification of policy relating to major combatant vessels of the strike 

forces of the Navy. 

Subtitle D—Counterterrorism 

Sec. 1031. Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members on military commissions. 

Sec. 1032. Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program reporting requirement. 

Sec. 1033. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United 

States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, 

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1034. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals 

detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1035. Transfers to foreign countries of individuals detained at United States 

Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1036. Report on information relating to individuals detained at Parwan, Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1037. Grade of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in military commissions established to try individuals detained at Guantanamo. 

Sec. 1038. Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain, rehabilitate, and 

prosecute individuals detained at Guantanamo who are transferred to 

Yemen. 
H. R. 3304—9 

Sec. 1039. Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained at Guantanamo 

if transferred to the United States. 

Subtitle E—Sensitive Military Operations 

Sec. 1041. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations. 

Sec. 1042. Counterterrorism operational briefings. 

Sec. 1043. Report on process for determining targets of lethal or capture operations. 

Subtitle F—Nuclear Forces 

Sec. 1051. Notification required for reduction or consolidation of dual-capable aircraft based in Europe. 

Sec. 1052. Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and 

Communications System. 

Sec. 1053. Modification of responsibilities and reporting requirements of Nuclear 

Weapons Council. 

Sec. 1054. Modification of deadline for report on plan for nuclear weapons stockpile, 

nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery systems, and nuclear weapons command and control system. 

Sec. 1055. Prohibition on elimination of nuclear triad. 

Sec. 1056. Implementation of New START Treaty. 

Sec. 1057. Retention of capability to redeploy multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles. 

Sec. 1058. Report on New START Treaty. 

Sec. 1059. Report on implementation of the recommendations of the Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation Report. 

Sec. 1060. Sense of Congress on further strategic nuclear arms reductions with the 

Russian Federation. 

Sec. 1061. Sense of Congress on compliance with nuclear arms control treaty obligations. 

Sec. 1062. Senses of Congress on ensuring the modernization of the nuclear forces 

of the United States. 

Subtitle G—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations 

Sec. 1071. Enhancement of capacity of the United States Government to analyze 

captured records. 

Sec. 1072. Strategic plan for the management of the electromagnetic spectrum. 

Sec. 1073. Extension of authority to provide military transportation services to certain other agencies at the Department of Defense reimbursement rate. 

Sec. 1074. Notification of modifications to Army force structure. 

Sec. 1075. Aircraft joint training. 

Subtitle H—Studies and Reports 

Sec. 1081. Online availability of reports submitted to Congress. 

Sec. 1082. Oversight of combat support agencies. 

Sec. 1083. Inclusion in annual report of description of interagency coordination relating to humanitarian demining technology. 

Sec. 1084. Repeal and modification of reporting requirements. 

Sec. 1085. Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General assessment of Department of Defense efficiencies. 

Sec. 1086. Review and assessment of United States Special Operations Forces and 

United States Special Operations Command. 

Sec. 1087. Reports on unmanned aircraft systems. 

Sec. 1088. Report on foreign language support contracts for the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1089. Civil Air Patrol. 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

Sec. 1091. Technical and clerical amendments. 

Sec. 1092. Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major automated information system programs. 

Sec. 1093. Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to issue non-premium aviation insurance. 

Sec. 1094. Extension of Ministry of Defense Advisor Program and authority to 

waive reimbursement of costs of activities for certain nongovernmental 

personnel. 

Sec. 1095. Amendments to certain national commissions. 

Sec. 1096. Strategy for future military information operations capabilities. 

Sec. 1097. Sense of Congress on collaboration on border security. 

Sec. 1098. Transfer of aircraft to other departments for wildfire suppression and 

other purposes; tactical airlift fleet of the Air Force. 
H. R. 3304—10 

TITLE XI—CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS 

Sec. 1101. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium 

pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees 

working overseas. 

Sec. 1102. One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official duty in a combat zone. 

Sec. 1103. Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for civilian employees of the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1104. Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance payments to Department of Defense employees. 

Sec. 1105. Revision to amount of financial assistance under Department of Defense 

Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation (SMART) Defense Education Program and assessment of STEM and other programs. 

Sec. 1106. Extension of program for exchange of information-technology personnel. 

Sec. 1107. Temporary authorities for certain positions at Department of Defense research and engineering facilities. 

Sec. 1108. Compliance with law regarding availability of funding for civilian personnel. 

Sec. 1109. Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation authority for civilian personnel for care and treatment of wounded and injured members of the Armed Forces. 

TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS 

Subtitle A—Assistance and Training 

Sec. 1201. Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build 

the capacity of foreign military forces. 

Sec. 1202. Global Security Contingency Fund. 

Sec. 1203. Training of general purpose forces of the United States Armed Forces 

with military and other security forces of friendly foreign countries. 

Sec. 1204. Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of foreign countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction. 

Sec. 1205. Authorization of National Guard State Partnership Program. 

Sec. 1206. United States security and assistance strategies in Africa. 

Sec. 1207. Assistance to the Government of Jordan for border security operations. 

Sec. 1208. Support of foreign forces participating in operations to disarm the Lord’s 

Resistance Army. 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq 

Sec. 1211. Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1212. One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration activities 

in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1213. Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for 

support provided to United States military operations. 

Sec. 1214. Extension and modification of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq. 

Sec. 1215. One-year extension and modification of authority for program to develop 

and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1216. Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 100 percent of all taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not reimbursed by Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1217. Extension of certain authorities for support of foreign forces supporting 

or participating with the United States Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1218. Extension and improvement of the Iraqi special immigrant visa program. 

Sec. 1219. Improvement of the Afghan special immigrant visa program. 

Subtitle C—Matters Relating to Afghanistan Post 2014 

Sec. 1221. Report on plans to disrupt and degrade Haqqani Network activities and 

finances. 

Sec. 1222. Completion of accelerated transition of security responsibility from 

United States Armed Forces to the Afghan National Security Forces. 

Sec. 1223. Defense intelligence plan. 

Sec. 1224. Limitation on availability of funds for certain authorities for Afghanistan. 

Subtitle D—Matters Relating to Iran 

Sec. 1231. Report on United States military partnership with Gulf Cooperation 

Council countries. 

Sec. 1232. Additional elements in annual report on military power of Iran. 
H. R. 3304—11 

Sec. 1233. Integrated air and missile defense programs at training locations in 

Southwest Asia. 

Subtitle E—Reports and Other Matters 

Sec. 1241. Two-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities. 

Sec. 1242. Element on 5th generation fighter program in annual report on military 

and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China. 

Sec. 1243. Report on posture and readiness of the Armed Forces to respond to an 

attack or other contingency against United States diplomatic facilities 

overseas. Sec. 1244. Limitation on establishment of Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers. 

Sec. 1245. Additional reports on military and security developments involving the 

Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. 

Sec. 1246. Sense of Congress on missile defense cooperation with the Russian Federation and limitations on providing certain missile defense information 

to the Russian Federation. 

Sec. 1247. Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and Disarmament 

Act. 

Sec. 1248. Report on actions to reduce support for ballistic missile proliferation. 

Sec. 1249. Reports on international agreements relating to the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1250. Revision of statutory references to former NATO support organizations 

and related NATO agreements. 

Sec. 1251. Executive agreements with the Russian Federation relating to ballistic 

missile defense. 

Sec. 1252. Rule of construction. 

Sec. 1253. Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms Trade Treaty. 

Sec. 1254. Report on military and security developments involving the Russian 

Federation. 

Sec. 1255. Prohibition on use of funds to enter into contracts or agreements with 

Rosoboronexport. 

TITLE XIII—COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 

Sec. 1301. Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and funds. 

Sec. 1302. Funding allocations. 

Sec. 1303. Extension of authority for utilization of contributions to the cooperative 

threat reduction program. 

Sec. 1304. Strategy to modernize cooperative threat reduction and prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the 

Middle East and North Africa region. 

TITLE XIV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

Subtitle A—Military Programs 

Sec. 1401. Working capital funds. 

Sec. 1402. National Defense Sealift Fund. 

Sec. 1403. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense. 

Sec. 1404. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 

Sec. 1405. Defense Inspector General. 

Sec. 1406. Defense Health Program. 

Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile 

Sec. 1411. Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation of a strategic and 

critical materials supply. 

Sec. 1412. Authority to acquire additional materials for the National Defense 

Stockpile. 

Subtitle C—Other Matters 

Sec. 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois. 

Sec. 1422. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home. 

Sec. 1423. Cemeterial expenses. 

TITLE XV—AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations 

Sec. 1501. Purpose. 
H. R. 3304—12 

Sec. 1502. Procurement. 

Sec. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation. 

Sec. 1504. Operation and maintenance. 

Sec. 1505. Military personnel. 

Sec. 1506. Working capital funds. 

Sec. 1507. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 

Sec. 1508. Defense Inspector General. 

Sec. 1509. Defense Health Program. 

Subtitle B—Financial Matters 

Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations. 

Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority. 

Subtitle C—Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters 

Sec. 1531. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund. 

Sec. 1532. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. 

Sec. 1533. Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization. 

Sec. 1534. Extension of authority for Task Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan. 

TITLE XVI—INDUSTRIAL BASE MATTERS 

Subtitle A—Defense Industrial Base Matters 

Sec. 1601. Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector General of Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1602. Foreign space activities. 

Sec. 1603. Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program. 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Small Business Concerns 

Sec. 1611. Advancing small business growth. 

Sec. 1612. Amendments relating to Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative 

Agreement Program. 

Sec. 1613. Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded to small business 

concerns. Sec. 1614. Credit for certain small business subcontractors. 

Sec. 1615. Inapplicability of requirement to review and justify certain contracts. 

TITLE XVII—SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE AND 

RELATED REFORMS 

Subtitle A—Reform of Uniform Code of Military Justice 

Sec. 1701. Extension of crime victims’ rights to victims of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

Sec. 1702. Revision of Article 32 and Article 60, Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

Sec. 1703. Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial by court-martial 

for additional offenses involving sex-related crimes. 

Sec. 1704. Defense counsel interview of victim of an alleged sex-related offense in 

presence of trial counsel, counsel for the victim, or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate. 

Sec. 1705. Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses and trial of such 

offenses by general courts-martial. 

Sec. 1706. Participation by victim in clemency phase of courts-martial process. 

Sec. 1707. Repeal of the offense of consensual sodomy under the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice. 

Sec. 1708. Modification of Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate factor relating to 

character and military service of the accused in rule on initial disposition of offenses. 

Sec. 1709. Prohibition of retaliation against members of the Armed Forces for reporting a criminal offense. 

Subtitle B—Other Amendments to Title 10, United States Code 

Sec. 1711. Prohibition on service in the Armed Forces by individuals who have been 

convicted of certain sexual offenses. 

Sec. 1712. Issuance of regulations applicable to the Coast Guard regarding consideration of request for permanent change of station or unit transfer by 

victim of sexual assault. 

Sec. 1713. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member of the 

Armed Forces on active duty who is accused of committing a sexual assault or related offense. 

Sec. 1714. Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to protected communications of members of the Armed Forces and prohibited retaliatory actions. 
H. R. 3304—13 

Sec. 1715. Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory personnel actions taken in response to making protected communications regarding 

sexual assault. 

Sec. 1716. Designation and availability of Special Victims’ Counsel for victims of 

sex-related offenses. 

Subtitle C—Amendments to Other Laws 

Sec. 1721. Tracking of compliance of commanding officers in conducting organizational climate assessments for purposes of preventing and responding to 

sexual assaults. 

Sec. 1722. Advancement of submittal deadline for report of independent panel on 

assessment of military response systems to sexual assault. 

Sec. 1723. Retention of certain forms in connection with Restricted Reports and 

Unrestricted Reports on sexual assault involving members of the Armed 

Forces. 

Sec. 1724. Timely access to Sexual Assault Response Coordinators by members of 

the National Guard and Reserves. 

Sec. 1725. Qualifications and selection of Department of Defense sexual assault 

prevention and response personnel and required availability of Sexual 

Assault Nurse Examiners. 

Sec. 1726. Additional responsibilities of Sexual Assault Prevention and Response 

Office for Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response program. 

Subtitle D—Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports 

Sec. 1731. Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of Military Justice and judicial proceedings of sexual assault cases. 

Sec. 1732. Review and policy regarding Department of Defense investigative practices in response to allegations of Uniform Code of Military Justice violations. 

Sec. 1733. Review of training and education provided members of the Armed Forces 

on sexual assault prevention and response. 

Sec. 1734. Report on implementation of Department of Defense policy on the retention of and access to evidence and records relating to sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1735. Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity 

role in sexual harassment cases. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Sec. 1741. Enhanced protections for prospective members and new members of the 

Armed Forces during entry-level processing and training. 

Sec. 1742. Commanding officer action on reports on sexual offenses involving members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1743. Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response to unrestricted report of sexual assault in which the victim is a member of the Armed 

Forces. 

Sec. 1744. Review of decisions not to refer charges of certain sex-related offenses 

for trial by court-martial. 

Sec. 1745. Inclusion and command review of information on sex-related offenses in 

personnel service records of members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1746. Prevention of sexual assault at military service academies. 

Sec. 1747. Required notification whenever members of the Armed Forces are completing Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National Security Positions. 

Subtitle F—Sense of Congress Provisions 

Sec. 1751. Sense of Congress on commanding officer responsibility for command climate free of retaliation. 

Sec. 1752. Sense of Congress on disposition of charges involving certain sexual misconduct offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice through 

courts-martial. 

Sec. 1753. Sense of Congress on the discharge in lieu of court-martial of members 

of the Armed Forces who commit sex-related offenses. 

DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS 

Sec. 2001. Short title. 

Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by 

law. 

TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. 
H. R. 3304—14 

Sec. 2102. Family housing. 

Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army. 

Sec. 2104. Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United States Military 

Academy, New York. 

Sec. 2105. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project. 

Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project. 

Sec. 2107. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project. 

Sec. 2108. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2010 projects. 

Sec. 2109. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 

TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2202. Family housing. 

Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. 

Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. 

Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project. 

Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project. 

Sec. 2207. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 

TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2302. Family housing. 

Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units. 

Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. 

Sec. 2305. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 

project. 

Sec. 2306. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project. 

Sec. 2307. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project. 

TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 

Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects. 

Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. 

Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations 

Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, 

defense-wide. 

TITLE XXV—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY 

INVESTMENT PROGRAM 

Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. 

TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES 

Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects. 

Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and 

land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects. 

Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

Sec. 2611. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project. 

Sec. 2612. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 

TITLE XXVII—BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

Sec. 2711. Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and Closure 

(BRAC) round. 
H. R. 3304—15 

Sec. 2712. Elimination of quarterly certification requirement regarding availability 

of military health care in National Capital Region. 

Sec. 2713. Report on 2005 base closure and realignment joint basing initiative. 

TITLE XXVIII—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes 

Sec. 2801. Modification and extension of authority to utilize unspecified minor military construction authority for laboratory revitalization projects. 

Sec. 2802. Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited partnerships with private developers of housing. 

Sec. 2803. Military construction standards to improve force protection. 

Sec. 2804. Application of cash payments received for utilities and services. 

Sec. 2805. Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of military housing 

investment authority. 

Sec. 2806. Additional element for annual report on military housing privatization 

projects. 

Sec. 2807. Policies and requirements regarding overseas military construction and 

closure and realignment of United States military installations in foreign countries. 

Sec. 2808. Extension and modification of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects in certain areas 

outside the United States. 

Sec. 2809. Limitation on construction projects in European Command area of responsibility. 

Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration 

Sec. 2811. Development of master plans for major military installations. 

Sec. 2812. Authority for acceptance of funds to cover administrative expenses associated with real property leases and easements. 

Sec. 2813. Modification of authority to enter into long-term contracts for receipt of 

utility services as consideration for utility systems conveyances. 

Sec. 2814. Report on efficient utilization of Department of Defense real property. 

Sec. 2815. Conditions on Department of Defense expansion of Pin ̃ on Canyon Maneuver Site, Fort Carson, Colorado. 

Subtitle C—Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment 

Sec. 2821. Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal year for period 

covered by annual report of Interagency Coordination Group of Inspectors General for Guam Realignment. 

Sec. 2822. Realignment of Marines Corps forces in Asia-Pacific Region. 

Subtitle D—Land Conveyances 

Sec. 2831. Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County, California. 

Sec. 2832. Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura County, California. 

Sec. 2833. Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii. 

Sec. 2834. Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 

Sec. 2835. Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah. 

Sec. 2836. Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis Peak, Wasatch 

Mountains, Utah. 

Sec. 2837. Land conveyances, former United States Army Reserve Centers, Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Sec. 2841. Repeal of annual Economic Adjustment Committee reporting requirement. 

Sec. 2842. Establishment of military divers memorial. 

TITLE XXIX—WITHDRAWAL, RESERVATION, AND TRANSFER OF PUBLIC 

LANDS TO SUPPORT MILITARY READINESS AND SECURITY 

Sec. 2901. Short title. 

Sec. 2902. Definitions. 

Subtitle A—General Provisions 

Sec. 2911. General applicability; definitions. 

Sec. 2912. Maps and legal descriptions. 

Sec. 2913. Access restrictions. 

Sec. 2914. Changes in use. 
H. R. 3304—16 

Sec. 2915. Brush and range fire prevention and suppression. 

Sec. 2916. Ongoing decontamination. 

Sec. 2917. Water rights. 

Sec. 2918. Hunting, fishing, and trapping. 

Sec. 2919. Limitation on extensions and renewals. 

Sec. 2920. Application for renewal of a withdrawal and reservation. 

Sec. 2921. Limitation on subsequent availability of land for appropriation. 

Sec. 2922. Relinquishment. 

Sec. 2923. Immunity of the United States. 

Subtitle B—Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana 

Sec. 2931. Withdrawal and reservation of public land. 

Sec. 2932. Management of withdrawn and reserved land. 

Sec. 2933. Special rules governing minerals management. 

Sec. 2934. Grazing. 

Sec. 2935. Payments in lieu of taxes. 

Sec. 2936. Duration of withdrawal and reservation. 

Subtitle C—Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California 

Sec. 2941. Withdrawal and reservation of public land. 

Sec. 2942. Management of withdrawn and reserved land. 

Sec. 2943. Public access. 

Sec. 2944. Resource management group. 

Sec. 2945. Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area. 

Sec. 2946. Duration of withdrawal and reservation. 

Subtitle D—White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, and Fort Bliss, Texas 

Sec. 2951. Withdrawal and reservation of public land. 

Sec. 2952. Grazing. 

Subtitle E—Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California 

Sec. 2961. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction of public land. 

Sec. 2962. Management and use of transferred land. 

Sec. 2963. Effect of termination of military use. 

Sec. 2964. Temporary extension of existing withdrawal period. 

Sec. 2965. Water rights. 

Sec. 2966. Realignment of range boundary and related transfer of title. 

Subtitle F—Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California 

Sec. 2971. Withdrawal and reservation of public land. 

Sec. 2972. Management of withdrawn and reserved land. 

Sec. 2973. Assignment of management responsibility to Secretary of the Navy. 

Sec. 2974. Geothermal resources. 

Sec. 2975. Wild horses and burros. 

Sec. 2976. Continuation of existing agreement. 

Sec. 2977. Management plans. 

Sec. 2978. Termination of prior withdrawals. 

Sec. 2979. Duration of withdrawal and reservation. 

DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY 

AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations 

Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration. 

Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup. 

Sec. 3103. Other defense activities. 

Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations 

Sec. 3111. Clarification of principles of National Nuclear Security Administration. 

Sec. 3112. Cost estimation and program evaluation by National Nuclear Security 

Administration. 

Sec. 3113. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk. 

Sec. 3114. Limitation on availability of funds for National Nuclear Security Administration. 

Sec. 3115. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Administrator for 

Nuclear Security. 

Sec. 3116. Establishment of Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Response, 

and Testing. 
H. R. 3304—17 

Sec. 3117. Authorization of modular building strategy as an alternative to the replacement project for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building, 

Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico. Sec. 3118. Comparative analysis of warhead life extension options. 

Sec. 3119. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into transactions 

to carry out certain research projects. Sec. 3120. Increase in construction design threshold. 

Subtitle C—Plans and Reports 

Sec. 3121. Annual report and certification on status of security of atomic energy defense facilities. 

Sec. 3122. Modifications to annual reports regarding the condition of the nuclear 

weapons stockpile. Sec. 3123. Inclusion of integrated plutonium strategy in nuclear weapons stockpile 

stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan. Sec. 3124. Modifications to cost-benefit analyses for competition of management 

and operating contracts. Sec. 3125. Modification of deadlines for certain reports relating to program on scientific engagement for nonproliferation. Sec. 3126. Modification of certain reports on cost containment for uranium capabilities replacement project. Sec. 3127. Plan for tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation. 

Sec. 3128. Plan for improvement and integration of financial management of nuclear security enterprise. Sec. 3129. Plan for developing exascale computing and incorporating such computing into the stockpile stewardship program. Sec. 3130. Study and plan for extension of certain pilot program principles. 

Sec. 3131. Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries. 

Sec. 3132. Repeal of certain reporting requirements. 

Subtitle D—Other Matters 

Sec. 3141. Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy. 

Sec. 3142. Modification of deadlines for Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise. Sec. 3143. Department of Energy land conveyance. 

Sec. 3144. Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954. 

Sec. 3145. Technical corrections to the National Nuclear Security Administration 

Act. 

Sec. 3146. Technical corrections to the Atomic Energy Defense Act. 

Sec. 3147. Sense of Congress on B61–12 life extension program. 

Sec. 3148. Sense of Congress on establishment of an advisory board on toxic substances and worker health. 

TITLE XXXII—DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD 

Sec. 3201. Authorization. 

TITLE XXXIV—NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES 

Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations. 

TITLE XXXV—MARITIME ADMINISTRATION 

Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2014. Sec. 3502. 5-year reauthorization of vessel war risk insurance program. 

Sec. 3503. Sense of Congress. 

Sec. 3504. Treatment of funds for intermodal transportation maritime facility, Port 

of Anchorage, Alaska. Sec. 3505. Strategic seaports. 

DIVISION D—FUNDING TABLES 

Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables. 

TITLE XLI—PROCUREMENT 

Sec. 4101. Procurement. 

Sec. 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLII—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation. 

Sec. 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLIII—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance. 
H. R. 3304—18 

Sec. 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL 

Sec. 4401. Military personnel. 

Sec. 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

Sec. 4501. Other authorizations. 

Sec. 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLVI—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 4601. Military construction. 

TITLE XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

Sec. 4701. Department of energy national security programs. 

SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES. 

For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘congressional defense 

committees’’ has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) 

of title 10, United States Code. 

SEC. 4. EXPLANATORY STATEMENT. 

The explanatory statement regarding this Act, printed in the 

House section of the Congressional Record on or about December 

11, 2013, by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services 

of the House of Representatives, shall have the same effect with 

respect to the implementation of this Act as if it were a joint 

explanatory statement of a committee of conference. 

DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS 

TITLE I—PROCUREMENT 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations. 

Subtitle B—Army Programs 

Sec. 111. Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker vehicle program. 

Sec. 112. Study on multiyear, multivehicle procurement authority for tactical vehicles. 

Subtitle C—Navy Programs 

Sec. 121. CVN–78 class aircraft carrier program. 

Sec. 122. Repeal of requirements relating to procurement of future surface combatants. 

Sec. 123. Multiyear procurement authority for E–2D aircraft program. 

Sec. 124. Limitation on availability of funds for Littoral Combat Ship. 

Subtitle D—Air Force Programs 

Sec. 131. Repeal of requirement for maintenance of certain retired KC–135E aircraft. 

Sec. 132. Multiyear procurement authority for C–130J aircraft. 

Sec. 133. Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics modernization program for C–130 aircraft. 

Sec. 134. Prohibition of procurement of unnecessary C–27J aircraft by the Air 

Force. 

Subtitle E—Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters 

Sec. 141. Personal protection equipment procurement. 

Sec. 142. Repeal of certain F–35 reporting requirements. 

Sec. 143. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RQ–4 Global Hawk 

unmanned aircraft systems and A–10 aircraft. 
H. R. 3304—19 

Sec. 144. MC–12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance aircraft. 

Sec. 145. Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle providers. 

Sec. 146. Reports on personal protection equipment and health and safety risks associated with ejection seats. 

Subtitle A—Authorization of 

Appropriations 

SEC. 101. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the Marine 

Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in 

the funding table in section 4101. 

Subtitle B—Army Programs 

SEC. 111. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR STRYKER 

VEHICLE PROGRAM. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 

by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for 

weapons and tracked combat vehicles, Army, for the procurement 

or upgrade of Stryker vehicles, not more than 75 percent may 

be obligated or expended until a period of 15 days has elapsed 

following the date on which the Secretary of the Army submits 

the report under subsection (b). 

(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Army shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a report on the status 

of the Stryker vehicle spare parts inventory located in Auburn, 

Washington, cited in the report of the Inspector General of the 

Department of Defense (number 2013–025) dated November 30, 

2012. The report submitted under this subsection shall include 

the following: 

(1) The status of the implementation by the Secretary 

of the recommendations specified on pages 30 to 34 of the 

report by the Inspector General. 

(2) The value of the parts remaining in warehouse that 

may still be used by the Secretary for the repair, upgrade, 

or reset of Stryker vehicles. 

(3) The value of the parts remaining in the warehouse 

that are no longer usable by the Secretary for the repair, 

upgrade, or reset of Stryker vehicles. 

(4) A cost estimate of the monthly cost of maintaining 

the inventory of such parts that are no longer usable by the 

Secretary. 

(5) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate. 

SEC. 112. STUDY ON MULTIYEAR, MULTIVEHICLE PROCUREMENT 

AUTHORITY FOR TACTICAL VEHICLES. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) budget uncertainty and reduced defense procurements 

have had negative impacts on the tactical vehicle industrial 

base; and 

(2) in such environment, the Army should consider innovative contracting and acquisition strategies to maximize cost 
H. R. 3304—20 

savings, improve the sustainment of the tactical vehicle industrial base, and reduce risk during this downturn in defense 

procurement. 

(b) STUDY REQUIRED.— 

(1) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Army, in consultation 

with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall conduct a study of the desirability 

and feasibility of requesting legislative authority, in accordance 

with section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, to enter 

into one or more multiyear, multivehicle contracts for the 

procurement of tactical vehicles beginning in fiscal year 2015 

or thereafter. 

(2) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in consultation with 

the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 

and Logistics, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the possible multiyear, multivehicle contracting 

options and other innovative contracting options considered 

in the study under paragraph (1). Such report should include 

the following: 

(A) A business case analysis of a multiyear, multivehicle contract for tactical vehicles, including any potential 

increases in cost, savings, or risk that may derive from 

such a contract in comparison to standard contracting 

methods. 

(B) An evaluation of whether the Secretary requires 

legislative action to enter into such a multiyear, multivehicle contract. 

(C) Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate. 

Subtitle C—Navy Programs 

SEC. 121. CVN–78 CLASS AIRCRAFT CARRIER PROGRAM. 

(a) COST LIMITATION BASELINE FOR LEAD SHIP.—Subsection 

(a) of section 122 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2104) 

is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(a) LIMITATION.— 

‘‘(1) LEAD SHIP.—The total amount obligated from funds 

appropriated or otherwise made available for Shipbuilding and 

Conversion, Navy, or for any other procurement account, for 

the aircraft carrier designated as CVN–78 may not exceed 

$12,887,000,000 (as adjusted pursuant to subsection (b)). 

‘‘(2) FOLLOW-ON SHIPS.—The total amount obligated from 

funds appropriated or otherwise made available for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, or for any other procurement 

account, for the construction of any ship that is constructed 

in the CVN–78 class of aircraft carriers after the lead ship 

of that class may not exceed $11,498,000,000 (as adjusted 

pursuant to subsection (b)).’’. 

(b) HULL NUMBER; ADDITIONAL FACTOR FOR ADJUSTMENT OF

LIMITATION AMOUNT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of such section is 

amended— 
H. R. 3304—21 

(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 

‘‘CVN–21’’ and inserting ‘‘CVN–78’’; 

(B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘2006’’ and inserting 

‘‘2013’’; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(7) With respect to the aircraft carrier designated as CVN– 

78, the amounts of increases or decreases in costs of that 

ship that are attributable solely to an urgent and unforeseen 

requirement identified as a result of the shipboard test program.’’. 

(2) LIMITATION ON ADJUSTMENT.—Such section is further 

amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) LIMITATION ON SHIPBOARD TEST PROGRAM COST ADJUSTMENT.—With respect to using the authority under subsection (b)(7) 

to adjust the amount set forth in subsection (a)(1) for the aircraft 

carrier designated as CVN–78 for reasons relating to an urgent 

and unforeseen requirement identified as a result of the shipboard 

test program, the Secretary may only use such authority if— 

‘‘(1) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees, that such requirement was not 

known before the date of the submittal to Congress of the 

budget for fiscal year 2014 (as submitted pursuant to section 

1105 of title 31, United States Code); 

‘‘(2) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees, that waiting on an action by Congress to raise the cost cap specified in such subsection (a)(1) 

to account for such requirement will result in a delay in the 

delivery of that ship or a delay in the date of initial operating 

capability of that ship; and 

‘‘(3) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense 

committees a report setting forth a description of such requirement before the obligation of additional funds pursuant to 

such authority.’’. 

(c) REQUIREMENTS FOR CVN–79.—Such section is further 

amended by adding after subsection (e), as added by subsection 

(b)(2), the following new subsection: 

‘‘(f) REQUIREMENTS FOR CVN–79.— 

‘‘(1) QUARTERLY COST ESTIMATE.—The Secretary of the 

Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees 

on a quarterly basis a report setting forth the most current 

cost estimate for the aircraft carrier designated as CVN–79 

(as estimated by the program manager). Each cost estimate 

shall include the current percentage of completion of the program, the total costs incurred, and an estimate of costs at 

completion for ship construction, Government-furnished equipment, and engineering and support costs. 

‘‘(2) DIRECTION FOR NEGOTIATING CERTAIN CONTRACTS.— 

The Secretary shall ensure that each prime contract for the 

aircraft carrier designated as CVN–79 includes an incentive 

fee structure that will, throughout the period of performance 

of the contract, provide incentives for each contractor to meet 

the portion of the cost of the ship, as limited by subsection 

(a)(2) and adjusted pursuant to subsection (b), for which the 

contractor is responsible.’’. 

(d) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading of such section 

is amended to read as follows: 
H. R. 3304—22 

‘‘SEC. 122. ADHERENCE TO NAVY COST ESTIMATES FOR CVN–78 CLASS 

OF AIRCRAFT CARRIERS.’’. 

(e) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents at the beginning of such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 

122 and inserting the following: 

‘‘Sec. 122. Adherence to Navy cost estimates for CVN–78 class of aircraft carriers.’’. 

SEC. 122. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO PROCUREMENT 

OF FUTURE SURFACE COMBATANTS. 

Section 125 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2214; 10 U.S.C. 7291 

note) is repealed. 

SEC. 123. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR E–2D AIRCRAFT 

PROGRAM. 

(a) AUTHORITY FOR MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT.—Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the 

Navy may enter into one or more multiyear contracts, beginning 

with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of 

E–2D aircraft. 

(b) CONDITION FOR OUT-YEAR CONTRACT PAYMENTS.—A contract 

entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation 

of the United States to make a payment under the contract for 

a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject to the availability 

of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year. 

SEC. 124. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR LITTORAL 

COMBAT SHIP. 

(a) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 

2014 for construction or advanced procurement of materials for 

the Littoral Combat Ships designated as LCS 25 or LCS 26 may 

be obligated or expended until the Secretary of the Navy submits 

to the congressional defense committees each of the following: 

(1) The report required by subsection (b)(1). 

(2) A coordinated determination by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation and the Under Secretary of Defense 

for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics that successful 

completion of the test evaluation master plan for both seaframes 

and each mission module will demonstrate operational effectiveness and operational suitability. 

(3) A certification that the Joint Requirements Oversight 

Council— 

(A) has reviewed the capabilities of the legacy systems 

that the Littoral Combat Ship is planned to replace and 

has compared such capabilities to the capabilities to be 

provided by the Littoral Combat Ship; 

(B) has assessed the adequacy of the current capabilities development document for the Littoral Combat Ship 

to meet the requirements of the combatant commands and 

to address future threats as reflected in the latest assessment by the defense intelligence community; and 

(C) has either validated the current capabilities 

development document or directed the Secretary to update 

the current capabilities development document based on 

the performance of the Littoral Combat Ship and mission 

modules to date. 
H. R. 3304—23 

(4) A report on the expected performance of each seaframe 

variant and mission module against the current or updated 

capabilities development document. 

(5) Certification that a capability production document will 

be completed for each mission module before operational 

testing. 

(b) REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Chief of Naval Operations, 

in coordination with the Director of Operational Test and 

Evaluation, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the current concept of operations and expected 

survivability attributes of each of the Littoral Combat Ship 

seaframes. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall 

set forth the following: 

(A) A review of the current concept of operations of 

the Littoral Combat Ship and a comparison of such concept 

of operations with the original concept of operations of 

the Littoral Combat Ship. 

(B) An assessment of the ability of the Littoral Combat 

Ship to carry out the core missions of the Cooperative 

Strategy for 21st Century Seapower of the Navy. 

(C) A comparison of the combat capabilities for the 

three missions assigned to the Littoral Combat Ship 

seaframes (anti-surface warfare, mine countermeasures, 

and anti-submarine warfare) with the combat capabilities 

for each of such missions of the systems the Littoral Combat Ship is replacing. 

(D) An assessment of expected survivability of the Littoral Combat Ship seaframes in the context of the planned 

employment of the Littoral Combat Ship as described in 

the concept of operations. 

(E) The current status of operational testing for the 

seaframes and the mission modules of the Littoral Combat 

Ship. 

(F) An updated test and evaluation master plan for 

the Littoral Combat Ship. 

(G) A review of survivability testing, modeling, and 

simulation conducted to date on the two seaframes of the 

Littoral Combat Ship. 

(H) An updated assessment of the endurance of the 

Littoral Combat Ship at sea with respect to maintenance, 

fuel use, and sustainment of crew and mission modules. 

(I) An assessment of the adequacy of current ship 

manning plans for the Littoral Combat Ship and an assessment of the impact that increased manning has on design 

changes and the endurance of the Littoral Combat Ship. 

(J) A list of the casualty reports to date on each Littoral 

Combat Ship, including a description of the impact of such 

casualties on the design or ability of that Littoral Combat 

Ship to perform assigned missions. 

(3) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be 

submitted in classified form and unclassified form. 
H. R. 3304—24 

Subtitle D—Air Force Programs 

SEC. 131. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF CERTAIN 

RETIRED KC–135E AIRCRAFT. 

Section 135 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2114), 

as amended by section 131 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 

Stat. 4377), is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘(a) LIMITATION.—’’; and 

(2) by striking subsection (b). 

SEC. 132. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR C–130J AIRCRAFT. 

(a) AUTHORITY FOR MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT.—Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the 

Air Force may enter into one or more multiyear contracts, beginning 

with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of 

C–130J aircraft for the Department of the Air Force and the Department of the Navy. 

(b) CONDITION FOR OUT-YEAR CONTRACT PAYMENTS.—A contract 

entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation 

of the United States to make a payment under the contract for 

a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject to the availability 

of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year. 

SEC. 133. PROHIBITION ON CANCELLATION OR MODIFICATION OF AVIONICS MODERNIZATION PROGRAM FOR C–130 AIRCRAFT. 

(a) PROHIBITION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 

2014 for the Air Force may be used to— 

(1) take any action to cancel or modify the avionics modernization program of record for C–130 aircraft; or 

(2) initiate an alternative communication, navigation, 

surveillance, and air traffic management program for C–130 

aircraft that is designed or intended to replace the avionics 

modernization program described in paragraph (1). 

(b) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than April 1, 

2014, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a sufficiency review of 

the cost-benefit analysis conducted under section 143(b) of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public 

Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1662), including any findings and recommendations relating to such review. 

SEC. 134. PROHIBITION OF PROCUREMENT OF UNNECESSARY C–27J 

AIRCRAFT BY THE AIR FORCE. 

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112– 

81) for aircraft procurement, Air Force, that remain available to 

the Secretary of the Air Force on or after the date of the enactment 

of this Act may be obligated or expended for the procurement 

of additional C-27J aircraft that are not on contract as of June 

1, 2013. 
H. R. 3304—25 

Subtitle E—Defense-wide, Joint, and 

Multiservice Matters 

SEC. 141. PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT. 

(a) CONSOLIDATED BUDGET JUSTIFICATION DISPLAY.—Chapter 

9 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding after 

section 235 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 236. Personal protection equipment procurement: display 

of budget information 

‘‘(a) BUDGET JUSTIFICATION DISPLAY.—The Secretary of Defense 

shall submit to Congress, as a part of the defense budget materials 

for each fiscal year after fiscal year 2014, a consolidated budget 

justification display that covers all programs and activities associated with the procurement of personal protection equipment during 

the period covered by the future-years defense program submitted 

in that fiscal year under section 221. 

‘‘(b) REQUIREMENTS FOR BUDGET DISPLAY.—The consolidated 

budget justification display under subsection (a) for a fiscal year 

shall include the following: 

‘‘(1) The amount for personal protection equipment included 

in both the base budget of the President and any overseas 

contingency operations budget of the President. 

‘‘(2) A brief description of each category of personal protection equipment for each military department planned to be 

procured and developed. 

‘‘(3) For each category planned to be procured using funds 

made available for operation and maintenance (whether under 

the base budget or any overseas contingency operations 

budget)— 

‘‘(A) the relevant appropriations account, budget 

activity, and subactivity group for the category; and 

‘‘(B) the funding profile for the fiscal year as requested, 

including cost and quantities, and an estimate of projected 

investments or procurements for each of the subsequent 

five fiscal years. 

‘‘(4) For each category planned to be developed using funds 

made available for research, development, test, and evaluation 

(whether under the base budget or any overseas contingency 

operations budget)— 

‘‘(A) the relevant appropriations account, program, 

project or activity; program element number, and line 

number; and 

‘‘(B) the funding profile for the fiscal year as requested 

and an estimate of projected investments for each of the 

subsequent five fiscal years. 

‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The terms ‘budget’ and ‘defense budget materials’ have 

the meaning given those terms in section 234 of this title. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘category of personal protection equipment’ 

means the following: 

‘‘(A) Body armor components. 

‘‘(B) Combat helmets. 

‘‘(C) Combat protective eyewear. 

‘‘(D) Other items as determined appropriate by the 

Secretary.’’. 
H. R. 3304—26 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating 

to section 235 the following new item: 

‘‘236. Personal protection equipment procurement: display of budget information.’’. 

SEC. 142. REPEAL OF CERTAIN F–35 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

Section 122 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4157) 

is amended— 

(1) by striking subsection (b); and 

(2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b). 

SEC. 143. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RETIREMENT 

OF RQ–4 GLOBAL HAWK UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS 

AND A–10 AIRCRAFT. 

(a) LIMITATION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 

2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or 

expended to make significant changes to manning levels with 

respect to covered aircraft or to retire, prepare to retire, or 

place in storage a covered aircraft. 

(2) COVERED AIRCRAFT.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘covered aircraft’’ means the following: 

(A) A–10 aircraft (except for such aircraft that the 

Secretary of the Air Force, as of April 9, 2013, plans to 

retire). 

(B) RQ–4 Block 30 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft 

systems. 

(b) ADDITIONAL LIMITATION ON RETIREMENT OF CERTAIN A– 

10 AIRCRAFT.—In addition to the limitation in subsection (a)(1), 

during the period preceding December 31, 2014, the Secretary of 

the Air Force may not retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage 

A–10 aircraft (except for such aircraft that the Secretary, as of 

April 9, 2013, plans to retire). 

(c) REPORT.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in 

coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, 

shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a 

report on all high-altitude airborne intelligence, surveillance, 

and reconnaissance systems operated, or planned for future 

operation, by the Department of Defense. 

(2) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under paragraph (1) 

shall include— 

(A) the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance 

capabilities of each high-altitude intelligence, surveillance, 

and reconnaissance system covered by the report; 

(B) the plans to upgrade such capabilities in the future; 

(C) the fully-burdened cost-per-flight-hour of each such 

system; 

(D) the number of requests for each such system made 

by commanders of the combatant commands during the 

five-year period prior to the report, including the percentage of such requests that have been fulfilled to meet the 

requirements of such commanders; 
H. R. 3304—27 

(E) a description of the assumptions used by the Secretary in carrying out this subsection; and 

(F) any other information that the Secretary considers 

appropriate with respect to the analysis of high-altitude 

intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance systems. 

(3) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 

annex. 

(4) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.— 

In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee 

on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

(d) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed 

to limit or otherwise affect the requirement to maintain the operational capability of RQ–4 Block 30 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft 

systems under section 154(b) of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1666). 

SEC. 144. MC–12 LIBERTY INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE AIRCRAFT. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—Beginning on the date that is 60 days after 

the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report 

under subsection (d)(1), the Secretary may transfer MC–12 Liberty 

intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft from the Air 

Force to the Army in accordance with the plan developed under 

subsection (b)(1). 

(b) PLAN.— 

(1) PLAN REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

develop a plan for the potential transfer of MC–12 Liberty 

intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft from the 

Air Force to the Army pursuant to subsection (a). 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The plan required by paragraph (1) shall— 

(A) ensure that any transfer described in such paragraph does not adversely affect ongoing intelligence, 

surveillance, and reconnaissance operations, including such 

operations in Afghanistan; 

(B) identify the appropriate size, composition, and 

configuration of the fleet of MC–12 Liberty intelligence, 

surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft required by the 

Army; 

(C) identify the appropriate size, composition, configuration, and disposition of the remaining fleet of MC–12 

Liberty intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft required by the Air Force; 

(D) provide for the modification of the MC–12 Liberty 

intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft that 

are transferred to the Army pursuant to the plan in order 

to meet the long-term needs of the Army; and 

(E) for any aircraft that are so transferred, include 

a time line for the orderly transfer of the aircraft in a 

manner consistent with subparagraph (A). 

(c) EFFECT ON OTHER PROGRAMS.— 
H. R. 3304—28 

(1) PROHIBITION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR PROCUREMENT.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by 

this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for 

the Army may be obligated or expended to procure additional 

aircraft under the Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance 

and Surveillance System program during fiscal year 2014. 

(2) CONVERSION OF AIRCRAFT.—The Secretary of the Army 

shall convert aircraft described in paragraph (3) to the 

Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance and Surveillance 

System program configuration to meet the requirements of 

the Army. The Secretary shall carry out this paragraph using 

funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise 

made available for fiscal year 2013 or 2014 for the Enhanced 

Medium Altitude Reconnaissance and Surveillance System program. 

(3) AIRCRAFT DESCRIBED.—The aircraft described in this 

paragraph are the following: 

(A) MC–12 Liberty intelligence, surveillance, and 

reconnaissance aircraft of the Air Force that are transferred 

to the Army pursuant to subsection (a). 

(B) Army Medium Altitude Multi-Intelligence intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance C–12 Quick Reaction Capability aircraft. 

(d) REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than the date on which the 

budget of the President for fiscal year 2015 is submitted to 

Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States 

Code, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the plan required by subsection 

(b)(1). 

(2) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 

annex. 

(3) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.— 

In this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee 

on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 145. COMPETITION FOR EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH 

VEHICLE PROVIDERS. 

(a) PLAN.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall 

develop a plan to implement the new acquisition strategy for 

the evolved expendable launch vehicle program described in 

the acquisition decision memorandum dated November 27, 

2012. 

(2) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The plan to implement the new 

acquisition strategy for the evolved expendable launch vehicle 

program under paragraph (1) shall include a general description 

of how the Secretary will conduct competition with respect 

to awarding a contract to certified evolved expendable launch 
H. R. 3304—29 

vehicle providers. Such description may include the following 

with respect to such acquisition strategy: 

(A) The proposed cost, schedule, and performance. 

(B) Mission assurance activities. 

(C) The manner in which the contractor will operate 

under the Federal Acquisition Regulation. 

(D) The effect of other contracts in which the contractor 

is entered into with the Federal Government, including 

the evolved expendable launch vehicle launch capability 

contract, the space station commercial resupply services 

contracts, and other relevant contracts regarding national 

security space and strategic programs. 

(E) Any other areas the Secretary determines appropriate. 

(b) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—At the same time that the Secretary 

issues a draft of the request for proposals with respect to 

a contract for the evolved expendable launch vehicle provider, 

the Secretary shall— 

(A) submit to the appropriate congressional committees 

a report that includes the plan under subsection (a)(1); 

or 

(B) provide to such committees a briefing on such 

plan. 

(2) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.— In this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means the following: 

(A) The congressional defense committees. 

(B) The Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. 

(C) The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 

of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee 

on Intelligence of the Senate. 

SEC. 146. REPORTS ON PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT AND 

HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH EJECTION 

SEATS. 

(a) STUDY ON PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

enter into a contract with a federally funded research and 

development center to conduct a study to identify and assess 

cost-effective and efficient alternative means for the procurement and research and development of personal protection 

equipment that supports and promotes competition and innovation in the personal protection equipment industrial base. 

(2) SUBMISSION.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

on which the contract is entered into under paragraph (1), 

the federally funded research and development center conducting the study under such paragraph shall submit to the 

Secretary the study, including any findings and recommendations. 

(3) REPORT.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the 

date on which the Secretary receives the study under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional 
H. R. 3304—30 

defense committees a report that includes the study under 

paragraph (1), the matters described in subparagraph (B), 

and any related findings, recommendations, comments, and 

plans of the Secretary. 

(B) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under subparagraph (A) shall include the following: 

(i) The findings and recommendations of the federally funded research and development center submitted 

to the Secretary under paragraph (2). 

(ii) An assessment of current and future technologies that could markedly improve body armor, 

including by decreasing weight, increasing survivability, and making other relevant improvements. 

(iii) An analysis of the capability of the personal 

protection equipment industrial base to leverage such 

technologies to produce the next generation body 

armor. 

(iv) An assessment of alternative body armor 

acquisition models, including different types of contracting and budgeting practices of the Department 

of Defense. 

(4) PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT.—In this subsection, 

the term ‘‘personal protection equipment’’ includes— 

(A) body armor components; 

(B) combat helmets; 

(C) combat protective eyewear; 

(D) environmental and fire-resistant clothing; and 

(E) other individual equipment items as determined 

appropriate by the Secretary. 

(b) REPORT ON HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH

EJECTION SEATS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 

setting forth an assessment of the risks to the health and 

safety of members of the Armed Forces of the ejection seats 

currently in operational use by the Air Force. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall 

include the following: 

(A) An assessment of whether aircrew members 

wearing advanced helmets, night vision systems, helmetmounted cueing system, or other helmet-mounted devices 

or attachments are at increased risk of serious injury or 

death during a high-speed ejection sequence. 

(B) An analysis of how ejection seats currently in operational use provide protection against head, neck, and 

spinal cord injuries during an ejection sequence. 

(C) An analysis of initiatives to decrease the risk of 

death or serious injury during an ejection sequence. 

(D) The status of any testing or qualifications on 

upgraded ejection seats that may reduce the risk of death 

or serious injury during an ejection sequence. 
H. R. 3304—31 

TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, 

TEST, AND EVALUATION 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations. 

Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations 

Sec. 211. Modification of requirements on biennial strategic plan for the Defense 

Advanced Research Projects Agency. 

Sec. 212. Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat vehicle engineering 

and manufacturing phase. 

Sec. 213. Limitation and reporting requirements for unmanned carrier-launched 

surveillance and strike system program. 

Sec. 214. Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force logistics transformation. 

Sec. 215. Limitation on availability of funds for defensive cyberspace operations of 

the Air Force. 

Sec. 216. Limitation on availability of funds for precision extended range munition 

program. 

Sec. 217. Long-range standoff weapon requirement; prohibition on availability of 

funds for noncompetitive procedures for offensive anti-surface warfare 

weapon contracts of the Navy. 

Sec. 218. Review of software development for F–35 aircraft. 

Sec. 219. Evaluation and assessment of the distributed common ground system. 

Sec. 220. Operationally responsive space. 

Sec. 221. Sustainment or replacement of Blue Devil intelligence, surveillance, and 

reconnaissance capabilities. 

Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs 

Sec. 231. Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on ballistic missile defense system. 

Sec. 232. Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program. 

Sec. 233. Prohibition on availability of funds for integration of certain missile defense systems; report on regional ballistic missile defense. 

Sec. 234. Availability of funds for co-production of Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system in the United States. 

Sec. 235. Additional missile defense radar for the protection of the United States 

homeland. 

Sec. 236. Evaluation of options for future ballistic missile defense sensor architectures. 

Sec. 237. Plans to improve the ground-based midcourse defense system. 

Sec. 238. Report on potential future homeland ballistic missile defense options. 

Sec. 239. Briefings on status of implementation of certain missile defense matters. 

Sec. 240. Sense of Congress and report on NATO and missile defense burden-sharing. 

Sec. 241. Sense of Congress on deployment of regional ballistic missile defense capabilities. 

Sec. 242. Sense of Congress on procurement of capability enhancement II 

exoatmospheric kill vehicle. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

Sec. 251. Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program. 

Sec. 252. Annual Comptroller General of the United States report on the acquisition program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter. 

Sec. 253. Report on strategy to improve body armor. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Sec. 261. Establishment of Communications Security Review and Advisory Board. 

Sec. 262. Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds for defense laboratories for research and development of technologies for military missions. 

Sec. 263. Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced technology achievements. 

Sec. 264. Five-year extension of pilot program to include technology protection features during research and development of certain defense systems. 

Sec. 265. Briefing on biometrics activities of the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 266. Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common missile compartment of Ohio-class replacement program with the United Kingdom’s 

Vanguard successor program. 
H. R. 3304—32 

Sec. 267. Sense of Congress on counter-electronics high power microwave missile 

project. 

Subtitle A—Authorization of 

Appropriations 

SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation as specified in the funding table in 

section 4201. 

Subtitle B—Program Requirements, 

Restrictions, and Limitations 

SEC. 211. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS ON BIENNIAL STRATEGIC 

PLAN FOR THE DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH 

PROJECTS AGENCY. 

(a) ELEMENTS OF STRATEGIC PLAN.—Subsection (b) of section 

2352 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by amending paragraph (1) to read as follows: 

‘‘(1) The strategic objectives of that agency, and the linkage 

between such objectives and the missions of the armed forces.’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking ‘‘goals’’ and inserting 

‘‘objectives’’; 

(3) by striking paragraph (3); 

(4) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs 

(3) and (4), respectively; and 

(5) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by paragraph (4) 

of this subsection, by striking ‘‘for the programs of that agency’’ 

and inserting ‘‘for programs demonstrating military systems 

to one or more of the armed forces’’. 

(b) RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUBMISSION OF PLAN.—Subsection (c) 

of such section is amended by striking ‘‘Secretary of Defense shall’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Director shall, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics,’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

shall apply with respect to biennial strategic plans submitted under 

section 2352 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by this 

section, after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 212. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR GROUND COMBAT VEHICLE ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING 

PHASE. 

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 

or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Army 

may be obligated or expended for post-Milestone B engineering 

and manufacturing phase development activities for the ground 

combat vehicle program until a period of 30 days has elapsed 

following the date on which the Secretary of the Army submits 

to the congressional defense committees a report that includes 

the following: 

(1) An independent assessment of the draft milestone B 

documentation for the ground combat vehicle that— 
H. R. 3304—33 

(A) is performed by the Director of Cost Assessment 

and Program Evaluation, the Assistant Secretary of 

Defense for Research and Engineering, or other similar 

official; and 

(B) analyzes whether there is a sufficient business 

case to proceed with the engineering and manufacturing 

development phase for the ground combat vehicle using 

only one contractor. 

(2) A certification by the Secretary that the ground combat 

vehicle program has— 

(A) feasible, fully defined, and stable requirements; 

(B) been demonstrated in a relevant environment in 

accordance with section 2366b(a)(3)(D) of title 10, United 

States Code, and achieved technology readiness or maturity; 

(C) independent and high-confidence cost estimates; 

(D) sufficient funding available during fiscal year 2014 

and sufficient funding planned for the period covered by 

the current future-years defense plan; and 

(E) a realistic and achievable schedule. 

SEC. 213. LIMITATION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR 

UNMANNED CARRIER-LAUNCHED SURVEILLANCE AND 

STRIKE SYSTEM PROGRAM. 

(a) LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF AIR VEHICLES.—The Secretary 

of Defense may not acquire more than six air vehicles of the 

unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike system prior 

to receiving milestone B approval (as defined in section 2366(e)(7) 

of title 10, United States Code) for engineering and manufacturing 

development and low-rate initial production. 

(b) QUARTERLY COST REPORTS.—Beginning 90 days after the 

date on which the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and 

strike system receives milestone A approval, and each 90-day period 

thereafter until such system receives milestone B approval, the 

Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report that includes, at a minimum— 

(1) the current cost estimate and schedule, as of the date 

of the report, for all segments of the unmanned carrier-launched 

surveillance and strike system program; 

(2) any changes to such cost estimate or schedule from 

the previous report; and 

(3) an explanation for any changes to the cost estimate 

or schedule or to the key performance parameters or key system 

attributes used for such program. 

(c) BUDGET DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENT.—In the budget 

materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense 

in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to section 

1105 of title 31, United States Code, of the budget for fiscal year 

2015, and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary shall include 

individual project lines for each program segment of the unmanned 

carrier-launched surveillance and strike system, within program 

element 0604404N, that articulate all costs, contractual actions, 

and other information associated with technology development for 

each such program segment. 

(d) ANNUAL GAO REVIEW.— (1) REVIEW.—The Comptroller General of the United States 

shall annually conduct a review of the acquisition program 
H. R. 3304—34 

for the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike 

system. 

(2) REPORT.—Not later than March 1 of each year, the 

Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report on the review under paragraph (1). 

(3) ELEMENTS.—Each report under paragraph (2) shall 

include such matters as the Comptroller General considers 

appropriate to fully inform the congressional defense committees of the status of the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike system program. Such matters should include, 

at a minimum, the following: 

(A) The extent to which the unmanned carrierlaunched surveillance and strike system program is 

meeting cost, schedule, and performance goals. 

(B) The progress and results of developmental testing. 

(C) An assessment of the acquisition strategy for the 

program, including whether the strategy is consistent with 

acquisition management best practices identified by the 

Comptroller General for the purposes of the program. 

(4) SUNSET.—The Comptroller General shall carry out this 

subsection until the earlier of— 

(A) the date on which the Secretary of the Navy awards 

a contract for the full-rate production of the unmanned 

carrier-launched surveillance and strike system; or 

(B) the date on which the unmanned carrier-launched 

surveillance and strike system program is terminated. 

SEC. 214. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR AIR FORCE 

LOGISTICS TRANSFORMATION. 

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 

otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for procurement, 

Air Force, or research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, 

for logistics information technology, including for the expeditionary 

combat support system, not more than 85 percent may be obligated 

or expended until the date that is 30 days after the date on 

which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional 

defense committees a report on how the Secretary will modernize 

and update the logistics information technology systems of the 

Air Force following the cancellation of the expeditionary combat 

support system. Such report shall include— 

(1) a detailed strategy and timeline for implementing the 

recommendations from the Expeditionary Combat Support 

System Acquisition Investigation Review Team Final Report; 

and 

(2) a description of the near-term options for maintaining 

or incrementally modernizing the logistics information technology systems of the Air Force until a replacement for the 

expeditionary combat support system can be determined. 

SEC. 215. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEFENSIVE 

CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS OF THE AIR FORCE. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 

by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for 

procurement, Air Force, or research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for Defensive Cyberspace Operations (Program Element 0202088F), not more than 90 percent may be obligated or 

expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date 

on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional 
H. R. 3304—35 

defense committees a report on the Application Software Assurance 

Center of Excellence. 

(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under subsection (a) shall 

include the following: 

(1) A description of how the Application Software Assurance 

Center of Excellence is used to support the software assurance 

activities of the Air Force and other elements of the Department 

of Defense, including pursuant to section 933 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 

112–239; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note). 

(2) A description of the resources used to support the 

Center of Excellence from the beginning of the Center through 

fiscal year 2014. 

(3) The plan of the Secretary for sustaining the Center 

of Excellence during the period covered by the future-years 

defense program submitted in 2013 under section 221 of title 

10, United States Code. 

SEC. 216. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR PRECISION 

EXTENDED RANGE MUNITION PROGRAM. 

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 

otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department 

of Defense, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended 

for the precision extended range munition program until the date 

on which the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff submits to 

the congressional defense committees written certification that— 

(1) such program is necessary to meet a valid operational 

need that cannot be met by the existing precision guided mortar 

munition of the Army, other indirect fire weapons, or aerialdelivered joint fires; and 

(2) a sufficient business case exists to proceed with the 

development and production of such program. 

SEC. 217. LONG-RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON REQUIREMENT; PROHIBITION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR NONCOMPETITIVE 

PROCEDURES FOR OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE 

WEAPON CONTRACTS OF THE NAVY. 

(a) LONG-RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall 

develop a follow-on air-launched cruise missile to the AGM– 

86 that— 

(A) achieves initial operating capability for conventional missions prior to the retirement of the conventionally 

armed AGM–86; 

(B) achieves initial operating capability for nuclear 

missions prior to the retirement of the nuclear-armed 

AGM–86; and 

(C) is capable of internal carriage and employment 

for both conventional and nuclear missions on the nextgeneration long-range strike bomber. 

(2) CONSECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT.—In developing a followon air-launched cruise missile to the AGM–86 in accordance 

with paragraph (1), the Secretary may carry out development 

and production activities with respect to nuclear missions prior 

to carrying out such activities with respect to conventional 

missions if the Secretary determines such consecutive order 

of development and production activities to be cost effective. 
H. R. 3304—36 

(b) OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON CONTRACTS

OF THE NAVY.— 

(1) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided by paragraph (2), 

none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 

or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the offensive 

anti-surface warfare weapon may be used to enter into or 

modify a contract using procedures other than competitive 

procedures (as defined in section 2302(2) of title 10, United 

States Code). 

(2) EXEMPTION; WAIVER.— 

(A) EXEMPTED ACTIVITIES.—The prohibition in paragraph (1) shall not apply to funds specified in such paragraph that are made available for the development, testing, 

and fielding of aircraft-launched offensive anti-surface warfare weapons capabilities. 

(B) NATIONAL SECURITY WAIVER AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the prohibition in paragraph 

(1) if the Secretary determines that such a waiver is in 

the national security interests of the United States. 

SEC. 218. REVIEW OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR F–35 AIRCRAFT. 

(a) SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.— 

(1) REVIEW.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall establish an independent 

team consisting of subject matter experts to review the development of software for the F–35 aircraft program (in this subsection referred to as the ‘‘software development program’’), 

including by reviewing the progress made with respect to— 

(A) managing the software development program; and 

(B) delivering critical software capability in accordance 

with current program milestones. 

(2) REPORT.—Not later than March 3, 2014, the Under 

Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees 

a report on the review under paragraph (1). Such report shall 

include the following: 

(A) An assessment by the independent team with 

respect to whether the software development program— 

(i) has been successful in meeting the key milestone dates occurring before the date of the report; 

and 

(ii) will be successful in meeting the established 

program schedule. 

(B) Any recommendations of the independent team 

with respect to improving the software development program to ensure that, in support of the start of initial 

operational testing, the established program schedule is 

met on time. 

(C) If the independent team determines that the software development program will be unable to deliver the 

full complement of software within the established program 

schedule, any potential alternatives that the independent 

team considers appropriate to deliver such software within 

such schedule. 

(b) AUTONOMIC LOGISTICS INFORMATION SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT

REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 

of this Act, the Under Secretary, in consultation with the Joint 
H. R. 3304—37 

Strike Fighter Joint Program Office, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on current plans, as of the 

date of the report, for long-term sustainment of the autonomic 

logistics information system of F–35 aircraft. Such report shall 

include the following: 

(1) Current plans for acquisition of technical data rights 

to autonomic logistics information system software and the 

potential competitive sustainment of elements of the autonomic 

logistics information system. 

(2) How sustainment of the autonomic logistics information 

system may take advantage of public-private partnerships 

authorized by section 2474 of title 10, United States Code, 

including schedules for actions necessary for such sustainment. 

(3) Any current plan to select, designate, and activate any 

Government-owned and Government-operated site to serve as 

the autonomic logistics operating unit. 

(4) Current plans to ensure that the autonomic logistics 

information system provides total asset visibility and accountability, including asset valuation and tracking, and for potential 

integration with other automated logistics systems. 

SEC. 219. EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE DISTRIBUTED 

COMMON GROUND SYSTEM. 

(a) PROJECT CODES FOR BUDGET SUBMISSIONS.—In the budget 

submitted by the President to Congress under section 1105 of 

title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2015 and each subsequent fiscal year, each capability component within the distributed 

common ground system program shall be set forth as a separate 

project code within the program element line, and each covered 

official shall submit supporting justification for the project code 

within the program element descriptive summary. 

(b) ANALYSIS.— 

(1) REQUIREMENT.—The Under Secretary of Defense for 

Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall conduct an analysis 

of capability components that are compliant with the intelligence community data standards and could be used to meet 

the requirements of the distributed common ground system 

program. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The analysis required under paragraph (1) 

shall include the following: 

(A) Revalidation of the distributed common ground 

system program requirements based on current program 

needs, recent operational experience, and the requirement 

for nonproprietary solutions that adhere to open-architecture principles. 

(B) Market research of current commercially available 

tools to determine whether any such tools could potentially 

satisfy the requirements described in subparagraph (A). 

(C) Analysis of the competitive acquisition options for 

any tools identified in subparagraph (B). 

(3) SUBMISSION.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees the results of the analysis conducted under paragraph (1). 

(c) COVERED OFFICIAL DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘covered official’’ means the following: 
H. R. 3304—38 

(1) The Secretary of the Army, with respect to matters 

concerning the Army. 

(2) The Secretary of the Navy, with respect to matters 

concerning the Navy. 

(3) The Secretary of the Air Force, with respect to matters 

concerning the Air Force. 

(4) The Commandant of the Marine Corps, with respect 

to matters concerning the Marine Corps. 

(5) The Commander of the United States Special Operations Command, with respect to matters concerning the United 

States Special Operations Command. 

SEC. 220. OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) it remains the policy of the United States, as expressed 

in section 913(a) of the John Warner National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 

120 Stat. 2355), to demonstrate, acquire, and deploy an effective 

capability for operationally responsive space to support military 

users and operations from space, which shall consist of— 

(A) responsive satellite payloads and busses built to 

common technical standards; 

(B) low-cost space launch vehicles and supporting 

range operations that facilitate the timely launch and onorbit operations of satellites; 

(C) responsive command and control capabilities; and 

(D) concepts of operations, tactics, techniques, and 

procedures that permit the use of responsive space assets 

for combat and military operations other than war; and 

(2) the Operationally Responsive Space Program Office has 

demonstrated through multiple launches since 2009 an ability 

to accomplish many of the policy objectives of the Operationally 

Responsive Space Program through specific missions, but has 

not executed a mission that leverages all policy objectives of 

such Program in a single mission. 

(b) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 

by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for 

the Department of Defense for the space-based infrared systems 

space modernization initiative wide-field-of-view testbed, not more 

than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the Executive 

Agent for Space of the Department of Defense certifies to the 

congressional defense committees that the Secretary of Defense 

is carrying out the Operationally Responsive Space Program Office 

in accordance with section 2273a of title 10, United States Code. 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Executive Agent for Space of the Department of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report regarding a potential mission that would seek to 

leverage all policy objectives of the Operationally Responsive Space 

Program in a single mission. 

SEC. 221. SUSTAINMENT OR REPLACEMENT OF BLUE DEVIL INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE 

CAPABILITIES. 

(a) PLAN TO RETAIN CAPABILITY.—The Secretary of the Air 

Force shall develop a plan to sustain the operational capabilities 

of the Blue Devil 1 Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance 
H. R. 3304—39 

Systems (in this section referred to as ‘‘Blue Devil 1 system’’), 

including precision signal geolocation, by— 

(1) procuring the existing Blue Devil 1 system; 

(2) developing a new system; or 

(3) basing a new system on capabilities that are adapted 

and integrated from existing programs and programs being 

developed. 

(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 

appropriate congressional committees a report on— 

(1) the potential cost of procuring, operating, and sustaining 

current Blue Devil 1 systems for fiscal years 2014 through 

2019, including costs relating to procurement, research and 

development, personnel, operation and maintenance, and military construction; 

(2) the ability of other current platforms and subsystems 

as of the date of the report to provide intelligence, surveillance, 

and reconnaissance support similar to the support provided 

by the current Blue Devil 1 system; and 

(3) a listing of programs of the Air Force and other programs of the Department of Defense in development as of 

the date of the report that could provide such similar support 

in the future. 

(c) REQUIREMENT TO COORDINATE.—In preparing the report 

under subsection (b), the Secretary shall— 

(1) coordinate with the Commander of the United States 

Special Operations Command regarding the operational needs 

of the United States Special Operations Command; and 

(2) coordinate with the Director of the Defense Advanced 

Research Projects Agency with respect to information regarding 

the transfer to the Air Force of the technology developed under 

the wide-area network detection program for operational 

integration of wide-area motion imagery and near-vertical direction-finding data for effective target detection, identification, 

and tracking for potential incorporation, as practical and appropriate, into other platforms. 

(d) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of 

the Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs 

SEC. 231. IMPROVEMENTS TO ACQUISITION ACCOUNTABILITY 

REPORTS ON BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM. 

(a) IMPROVEMENT TO OPERATIONS AND SUSTAINMENT COST ESTIMATES.—In preparing the acquisition accountability reports on the 

ballistic missile defense system required by section 225 of title 

10, United States Code, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency 

shall improve the quality of cost estimates relating to operations 

and sustainment that are included in such reports under subsection 
H. R. 3304—40 

(b)(3)(A) of such section, including with respect to the confidence 

levels of such cost estimates. 

(b) OPERATIONS AND SUSTAINMENT RESPONSIBILITY.—Section 

225 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at 

the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) OPERATIONS AND SUSTAINMENT COST ESTIMATES.—The 

Director shall ensure that each life-cycle cost estimate included 

in an acquisition baseline pursuant to subsection (b)(3)(A) 

includes— 

‘‘(1) all of the operations and sustainment costs for which 

the Director is responsible; and 

‘‘(2) a description of the operations and sustainment functions and costs for which a military department is responsible.’’. 

(c) REPORT.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense 

Agency shall submit to the congressional defense committees 

a report outlining the plans of the Director to improve the 

quality of cost estimates pursuant to subsection (a). 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall 

include— 

(A) a description of the actions planned to improve 

the quality of cost estimates included in the acquisition 

accountability reports on the ballistic missile defense 

system required by section 225 of title 10, United States 

Code; 

(B) the schedule for such planned actions, including 

the planned schedule for meeting the requirements of subsection (e) of such section 225, as added by subsection 

(b); 

(C) a description of any steps taken during the previous 

year to improve the quality of such cost estimates; 

(D) an assessment of how the planned improvements 

compare to the best practices and cost-estimation guidelines 

recommended by the Comptroller General of the United 

States for cost estimates of the ballistic missile defense 

system; 

(E) any other matters the Director considers appropriate; and 

(F) the views of the Comptroller General of the United 

States with respect to the contents of the report. 

(3) FORM.—The report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form. 

SEC. 232. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR MEADS PROGRAM. 

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 

or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department 

of Defense may be obligated or expended for the medium extended 

air defense system. 

SEC. 233. PROHIBITION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INTEGRATION OF CERTAIN MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS; REPORT 

ON REGIONAL BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE. 

(a) PROHIBITION ON INTEGRATION OF CERTAIN SYSTEMS.— 

(1) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that 

missile defense systems of the People’s Republic of China should 

not be integrated into the missile defense systems of the United 

States or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 
H. R. 3304—41 

(2) PROHIBITION.—None of the funds authorized to be 

appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal 

year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated 

or expended to integrate missile defense systems of the People’s 

Republic of China into missile defense systems of the United 

States. 

(b) REPORT ON REGIONAL BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 

the status and progress of regional missile defense programs 

and efforts. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall 

include the following: 

(A) A description of the overall risk assessment from 

the most recent Global Ballistic Missile Defense Assessment of regional missile defense capabilities relative to 

meeting the operational needs of the commanders of the 

geographic combatant commands, including the need for 

force protection of forward-deployed forces and capabilities 

of the United States and for the defense of allies and 

partners of the United States. 

(B) An assessment of whether and how the currently 

planned phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in 

Europe and other planned regional missile defense 

approaches and capabilities of the United States meet the 

integrated priorities of the commanders of the geographic 

combatant commands to achieve the operational requirements of the commanders to defend against the ballistic 

missile threat to deployed forces of the United States and 

allies of the United States, including a description of 

planned force structure deployment options to increase missile defense capabilities in the area of responsibility of 

a commander, if needed, in the event of warning of an 

imminent ballistic missile attack. 

(C) A detailed explanation of the current and planned 

concept of operations for the phased, adaptive approach 

to missile defense in Europe, including— 

(i) arrangements for allocating the command of 

assets of such approach between the Commander of 

the United States European Command and the 

Supreme Allied Commander, Europe; 

(ii) an explanation of the circumstances under 

which such command would be allocated to each commander; and 

(iii) a description of the prioritization of defense 

of both the deployed forces of the United States and 

the territory of the member states of the North Atlantic 

Treaty Organization using available missile defense 

interceptor inventory. 

(D) A description of the progress made in the development and testing of elements of systems intended for 

deployment in phases 2 and 3 of the phased, adaptive 

approach to missile defense in Europe, including the 

standard missile–3 block IB, the standard missile–3 block 

IIA interceptors, and the Aegis Ashore system, and any 

areas where work remains to ensure such phases are ready 
H. R. 3304—42 

for deployment as specified in the 2010 Ballistic Missile 

Defense Review. 

(E) A description of the manner in which elements 

of regional missile defense architectures, such as forwardbased X-band radars in Japan, Israel, Turkey, and the 

area of responsibility of the Commander of the United 

States Central Command, contribute to the enhancement 

of the homeland defense of the United States. 

(F) A description of the manner in which enhanced 

integration of offensive military capabilities and defensive 

missile defense capabilities, including the potential for 

improved intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, 

will fit into regional missile defense planning and force 

structure assessments. 

(G) A description of how the contributions of allies 

and partners of the United States that have purchased 

missile defense technology of the United States could aid 

in reducing the costs of deployment of regional missile 

defense capabilities of the United States, and how the 

systems of such allies and partners could be better 

networked and integrated to provide mutual force multiplication benefits. 

(H) A description of how the Secretary of Defense 

is working with allies and partners of the United States 

that have purchased air and missile defense technology 

of the United States to integrate the capabilities of such 

allies and partners provided by such technology with the 

air and missile defense systems and networks of the United 

States to provide mutual benefit. 

(I) Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate. 

(3) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 

annex. 

SEC. 234. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR CO-PRODUCTION OF IRON 

DOME SHORT-RANGE ROCKET DEFENSE SYSTEM IN THE 

UNITED STATES. 

(a) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.— (1) IN GENERAL.— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 

2014 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defensewide, for the Missile Defense Agency, not more than 

$15,000,000 may be obligated or expended for nonrecurring 

engineering costs in connection with the establishment of a 

capacity for co-production in the United States by industry 

of the United States of parts and components for the Iron 

Dome short-range rocket defense program. Such obligation or 

expenditure shall be made pursuant to an agreement described 

in paragraph (2). 

(2) AGREEMENT DESCRIBED.—An agreement described in 

this paragraph is an agreement entered into by the Government 

of the United States and the Government of Israel with respect 

to the co-production in the United States of parts and components for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program. 

(b) REPORT ON CO-PRODUCTION.—Not later than 30 days after 

obligating or expending funds specified in subsection (a), the 
H. R. 3304—43 

Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the plan to implement an 

agreement described in paragraph (2) of such subsection, including 

the following: 

(1) A description of the estimated cost of implementing 

the agreement, including the costs to be paid by industry. 

(2) The expected schedule to implement the agreement. 

(3) A description of any efforts to minimize the costs of 

the agreement to the Government of the United States. 

(c) REPORT ON MISSILE DEFENSE COOPERATION.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 

the status of missile defense cooperation between the United 

States and Israel. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall 

include the following: 

(A) A description of the current program of ballistic 

missile defense cooperation between the United States and 

Israel, including the objectives and results of such cooperation as of the date of the report. 

(B) A description of steps taken during the year prior 

to the report, and steps planned to be taken during the 

year following the report, by the governments of the United 

States and Israel to improve the coordination, interoperability, and integration of the missile defense capabilities 

of the United States and Israel. 

(C) A description of joint missile defense exercises and 

training that have been conducted by the United States 

and Israel, and the lessons learned from such exercises. 

(D) A description of joint efforts of the United States 

and Israel to develop ballistic missile defense technologies 

and capabilities. 

(E) Any other matters that the Secretary considers 

appropriate. 

(d) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed 

to alter or affect the procurement schedule, or anticipated procurement numbers, under the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense 

program. 

(e) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) second-source production of parts and components of 

the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program that is 

based in the United States is in the national security interest 

of both Israel and the United States; and 

(2) the move towards such a second-source capacity in 

the United States for integration and assembly of all-up rounds 

of the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program will further enhance the security of Israel by ensuring added production capability of such vital program. 

SEC. 235. ADDITIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE UNITED STATES HOMELAND. 

(a) DEPLOYMENT OF LONG-RANGE DISCRIMINATING RADAR.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Missile Defense 

Agency shall deploy a long-range discriminating radar against 

long-range ballistic missile threats from the Democratic People’s 

Republic of Korea. Such radar shall be located at a location 
H. R. 3304—44 

optimized to support the defense of the homeland of the United 

States. 

(2) FUNDING.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 

by this Act for research, development, test, and evaluation, 

Defense-wide, for the Missile Defense Agency for BMD Sensors 

(PE 63884C), as specified in the funding table in section 4201, 

$30,000,000 shall be available for initial costs toward the 

deployment of the radar required by paragraph (1). 

(b) ADDITIONAL SENSOR COVERAGE FOR THREATS FROM IRAN.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure 

that the Secretary is able to deploy additional tracking and 

discrimination sensor capabilities to support the defense of 

the homeland of the United States from future long-range ballistic missile threats that emerge from Iran. 

(2) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report that details what 

sensor capabilities of the United States, including re-locatable 

land- and sea-based capabilities, are or will become available 

to support the defense of the homeland of the United States 

from future long-range ballistic missile threats that emerge 

from Iran. Such report shall include the following: 

(A) With respect to the capabilities included in the 

report, an identification of such capabilities that can be 

located on the Atlantic-side of the United States by not 

later than 2019, or sooner if long-range ballistic missile 

threats from Iran are successfully flight-tested prior to 

2019. 

(B) A description of the manner in which the United 

States will maintain such capabilities so as to ensure the 

deployment of the capabilities in time to support the missile 

defense of the United States from long-range ballistic missile threats from Iran. 

SEC. 236. EVALUATION OF OPTIONS FOR FUTURE BALLISTIC MISSILE 

DEFENSE SENSOR ARCHITECTURES. 

(a) EVALUATION REQUIRED.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through 

the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall 

conduct an evaluation of options and alternatives for future 

sensor architectures for ballistic missile defense in order to 

enhance the ballistic missile defense capabilities of the United 

States. 

(2) CONSULTATION.—In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consult with the heads of departments and agencies 

of the Federal Government that the Secretary determines 

appropriate. 

(3) SCOPE OF EVALUATION.—In conducting the evaluation 

under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consider the following: 

(A) A wide range of options for a future sensor architecture for ballistic missile defense, including— 

(i) options regarding the future development, 

integration, exploitation, and deployment of existing 

or new missile defense sensor systems and assets; and 

(ii) options regarding using capabilities of the Federal Government that exist or are planned as of the 

date of the evaluation that are not primarily focused 
H. R. 3304—45 

on missile defense, including such capabilities that may 

require modification to be used for missile defense. 

(B) The potential costs, advantages, and feasibility of 

using such future sensor architecture for purposes other 

than missile defense, including for technical intelligence 

collection or space situational awareness. 

(C) Whether and how such future sensor architectures 

could be designed and employed to fulfill missions other 

than missile defense when not required for such missile 

defense missions. 

(4) OBJECTIVE.—The objective of the evaluation shall be 

to identify one or more future sensor architectures for ballistic 

missile defense that will result in an improvement of the 

performance of the ballistic missile defense system in a costeffective, operationally effective, timely, and affordable manner. 

(b) ELEMENTS TO BE EVALUATED.—The evaluation required by 

subsection (a) shall include a consideration of the following: 

(1) SENSOR TYPES.—At a minimum, the types of sensors 

as follows: 

(A) Radar. 

(B) Infrared. 

(C) Optical and electro-optical. 

(D) Directed energy. 

(2) SENSOR MODES.—Deployment modes of sensors as follows: 

(A) Ground-based sensors. 

(B) Sea-based sensors. 

(C) Airborne sensors. 

(D) Space-based sensors. 

(3) SENSOR FUNCTIONS.—At a minimum, missile defenserelated sensor functions as follows: 

(A) Detection. 

(B) Tracking. 

(C) Characterization. 

(D) Classification. 

(E) Discrimination. 

(F) Debris mitigation. 

(G) Kill assessment. 

(4) SENSOR ARCHITECTURE CAPABILITIES.—At a minimum, 

maximization or improvement of sensor-related capabilities as 

follows: 

(A) Handling of increasing raid sizes. 

(B) Precision tracking of threat missiles. 

(C) Providing fire-control quality tracks of evolving 

threat missiles. 

(D) Enabling launch-on-remote and engage-on-remote 

capabilities. 

(E) Discriminating lethal objects (warheads) from other 

objects. 

(F) Effectively assessing the results of engagements. 

(G) Enabling enhanced shot doctrine. 

(H) Other capabilities that the Secretary of Defense 

determines appropriate. 

(c) REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 
H. R. 3304—46 

the congressional defense committees a report setting forth 

the results of the evaluation required by subsection (a). 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall 

include the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the 

Secretary with respect to— 

(A) future sensor architectures evaluated under subsection (a)(3)(A)(i). 

(B) existing or planned capabilities of the Federal 

Government evaluated under subsection (a)(3)(A)(ii); 

(C) using future sensor architecture for additional purposes as described in subsection (a)(3)(B); and 

(D) the design and employment of future sensor 

architectures to fulfill missions other than missile defense 

as described in subsection (a)(3)(C). 

(3) FORM.—The report shall be submitted in unclassified 

form, but may include a classified annex. 

(d) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 224 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 

Stat. 1675) is repealed. 

SEC. 237. PLANS TO IMPROVE THE GROUND-BASED MIDCOURSE 

DEFENSE SYSTEM. 

(a) IMPROVED KILL ASSESSMENT CAPABILITY.—The Director of 

the Missile Defense Agency, in consultation with the Commander 

of the United States Strategic Command and the Commander of 

the United States Northern Command, shall develop— 

(1) options to achieve an improved kill assessment capability for the ground-based midcourse defense system that can 

be developed as soon as practicable with acceptable acquisition 

risk, with the objective of achieving initial operating capability 

by not later than December 31, 2019, including by improving— 

(A) the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle for the groundbased interceptor; 

(B) the command, control, battle management, and 

communications system; and 

(C) the sensor and communications architecture of the 

ballistic missile defense system; and 

(2) a plan to carry out such options that gives priority 

to including such improved capabilities in at least some of 

the 14 ground-based interceptors that will be procured by the 

Director, as announced by the Secretary of Defense on March 

15, 2013. 

(b) IMPROVED HIT ASSESSMENT.—The Director, in consultation 

with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command 

and the Commander of the United States Northern Command, 

shall take appropriate steps to develop an interim capability for 

improved hit assessment for the ground-based midcourse defense 

system that can be integrated into near-term exo-atmospheric kill 

vehicle upgrades and refurbishment. 

(c) REPORT ON IMPROVED CAPABILITIES.—Not later than April 

1, 2014, the Director, the Commander of the United States Strategic 

Command, and the Commander of the United States Northern 

Command shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report on— 

(1) the development of an improved kill assessment capability under subsection (a), including the plan developed under 

paragraph (2) of such subsection; and 
H. R. 3304—47 

(2) the development of an interim capability for improved 

hit assessment under subsection (b). 

(d) PLAN FOR UPGRADED ENHANCED EXO-ATMOSPHERIC KILL

VEHICLE.— 

(1) PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a plan to use covered 

funding to develop, test, and deploy an upgraded enhanced 

exo-atmospheric kill vehicle for the ground-based midcourse 

defense system that— 

(A) is tested under a test program coordinated with 

the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation; and 

(B) following such test program, is capable of being 

deployed during fiscal year 2018 or thereafter. 

(2) PRIORITY.—In developing the plan for an upgraded 

enhanced exo-atmospheric kill vehicle under paragraph (1), the 

Director shall give priority to the following attributes: 

(A) Cost effectiveness and high reliability, testability, 

producibility, modularity, and maintainability. 

(B) Capability across the midcourse battle space. 

(C) Ability to leverage ballistic missile defense system 

data with kill vehicle on-board capability to discriminate 

lethal objects. 

(D) Reliable on-demand communications. 

(E) Sufficient flexibility to ensure that the potential 

for future enhancements, including ballistic missile defense 

system interceptor commonality and multiple and volume 

kill capability, is maintained. 

(3) COVERED FUNDING DEFINED.—In this subsection, the 

term ‘‘covered funding’’ means— 

(A) funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 

or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the 

Missile Defense Agency, as specified in the funding table 

in section 4201; and 

(B) funds authorized to be appropriated by the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public 

Law 112–239) or otherwise made available for fiscal year 

2013 that are available to the Director to carry out the 

plan under paragraph (1). 

SEC. 238. REPORT ON POTENTIAL FUTURE HOMELAND BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE OPTIONS. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 240 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a report on potential future 

options for enhancing the ballistic missile defense of the homeland 

of the United States. 

(b) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary shall prepare the report 

under subsection (a) in consultation with the Commander of the 

United States Strategic Command, the Commander of the United 

States Northern Command, and the Director of the Missile Defense 

Agency. 

(c) ELEMENTS.—The report under subsection (a) shall include 

the following: 

(1) A description of the current assessment of the threat 

to the United States from limited ballistic missile attack 

(whether accidental, unauthorized, or deliberate), particularly 
H. R. 3304—48 

from countries such as North Korea and Iran, and an assessment of the projected future threat through 2022, including 

a discussion of confidence levels and uncertainties in such 

threat assessment. 

(2) A description of the current capability of the ballistic 

missile defense of the homeland of the United States to defend 

against the current threat of limited ballistic missile attack 

(whether accidental, unauthorized, or deliberate), particularly 

from countries such as North Korea and Iran. 

(3) A description of the status of efforts to correct the 

problems that caused the flight test failures of the groundbased midcourse defense system in December 2010 and July 

2013 and plans for future efforts, including additional flight 

testing, to demonstrate that the problems have been successfully corrected. 

(4) A description of planned improvements to the current 

ballistic missile defense system of the homeland of the United 

States, and the enhancements to the capability of such system 

that would result from such planned improvements, including— 

(A) deployment of 14 additional ground-based interceptors at Fort Greely, Alaska; 

(B) missile defense upgrades of early warning radars 

at Clear, Alaska, and Cape Cod, Massachusetts; 

(C) deployment of an in-flight interceptor communications system data terminal at Fort Drum, New York; and 

(D) improvements to the effectiveness and reliability 

of the ground-based interceptors and the overall groundbased midcourse defense system. 

(5) In accordance with subsection (d), a description of potential additional future options for the ballistic missile defense 

of the homeland of the United States, in addition to the 

improvements described in paragraph (4), if future ballistic 

missile threats warrant deployment of such options to increase 

the capabilities of such ballistic missile defense, including— 

(A) deployment of a missile defense interceptor site 

on the East Coast; 

(B) deployment of a missile defense interceptor site 

in another location in the United States, other than on 

the East Coast; 

(C) expansion of Missile Field–1 at Fort Greely, Alaska, 

to an operationally available 20-silo configuration, to permit 

further interceptor deployments; 

(D) deployment of additional ground-based interceptors 

for the ground-based midcourse defense system at Fort 

Greely, Alaska, or Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, 

or both; 

(E) deployment of additional missile defense sensors, 

including at a site in Alaska as well as an X-band radar 

on or near the East Coast or elsewhere, to enhance system 

tracking and discrimination, including various sensor 

options; 

(F) enhancements to the operational effectiveness, cost 

effectiveness, and overall performance of the ground-based 

midcourse defense system through improvements to system 

reliability, discrimination, battle management, exoatmospheric kill vehicle capability, and related functions; 
H. R. 3304—49 

(G) the potential for future enhancement and deployment of the standard missile–3 block IIA interceptor to 

augment the ballistic missile defense of the homeland of 

the United States; 

(H) missile defense options to defend the homeland 

of the United States against ballistic missiles that could 

be launched from vessels on the seas around the United 

States, including the Gulf of Mexico, or other ballistic missile threats that could approach the United States from 

the south, should such a threat arise in the future; and 

(I) any other options the Secretary considers appropriate. 

(d) EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL OPTIONS.—For each option 

described under subsection (c)(5), the Secretary shall provide an 

evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of such option. 

The evaluation of each such option shall include consideration of 

the following: 

(1) Technical feasibility. 

(2) Operational effectiveness and utility against the projected future threat. 

(3) Cost, cost effectiveness, and affordability. 

(4) Schedule considerations. 

(5) Agility to respond to changes in future threat evolution. 

(e) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.—Based on the 

evaluations required by subsection (d), the Secretary shall include 

in the report under subsection (a) such findings, conclusions, and 

recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate for potential future options for the ballistic missile defense of the homeland 

of the United States. 

(f) FORM.—The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted 

in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

SEC. 239. BRIEFINGS ON STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN 

MISSILE DEFENSE MATTERS. 

Not later than 180 days after the completion of the site evaluation study required by subsection (a) of section 227 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112– 

239; 126 Stat. 1678), and again one year after such date, the 

Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense 

committees a detailed briefing on the current status of efforts 

and plans to implement the requirements of such section, 

including— 

(1) the progress and plans toward preparation of the 

environmental impact statement required by subsection (b) of 

such section; and 

(2) the development of the contingency plan under subsection (d) of such section for deployment of an additional 

homeland missile defense interceptor site in case the President 

determines to proceed with such an additional deployment. 

SEC. 240. SENSE OF CONGRESS AND REPORT ON NATO AND MISSILE 

DEFENSE BURDEN-SHARING. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that 

as defense budget resources continue to decline in the United States, 

including by reason of funding reductions under the Budget Control 

Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–25), and the sequestration in effect 

by reason of such Act, the importance of burden-sharing among 
H. R. 3304—50 

members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization for missile 

defense is increasing. 

(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a report on the cost of 

missile defense for members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (in this section referred to as ‘‘NATO’’), including the phased, 

adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe, and the contributions made by members of NATO for such missile defense. 

(c) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under subsection (b) shall 

include the following: 

(1) The total estimated cost directly attributable to the 

various phases of the phased, adaptive approach to missile 

defense in Europe, including costs relating to research, development, testing, and evaluation, procurement, and military 

construction. 

(2) With respect to the cost of missile defense for NATO, 

including the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense 

in Europe, a description of the level of burden-sharing among 

members of NATO as of the date of the report, including 

through contributions made by a member in the form of hosting 

elements of such approach to missile defense in the territory 

of the member. 

(3) An assessment of, and recommendations for, areas 

where the Secretary determines that NATO and the members 

of NATO could improve the burden-sharing among members 

with respect to the cost of missile defense for NATO described 

in paragraph (2), including through the possible pooling of 

missile defense interceptors. 

(d) FORM.—The report required by subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

SEC. 241. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON DEPLOYMENT OF REGIONAL BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE CAPABILITIES. 

It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) the United States develops and deploys regional ballistic 

missile defense capabilities to protect the forward-deployed 

forces, allies, and partners of the United States against regional 

ballistic missile threats, consistent with the security obligations 

of the United States and as part of the broader theater security 

and military plans of the geographic combatant commanders 

of the United States; 

(2) in deciding on the deployment of regional missile 

defense assets and capabilities of the United States, the Secretary of Defense should give priority consideration to the 

capabilities needed to deter and defend against the ballistic 

missile threat, including the recommendations of the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff and the priorities of the geographic combatant 

commanders for meeting the operational needs of the commanders for ballistic missile defense; 

(3) such deployment decisions should take into account 

all of the ballistic missile threats to the forces, allies, and 

partners of the United States in each region; 

(4) the United States should encourage the allies and partners of the United States to acquire and contribute to integrated 

and complementary regional ballistic missile defense capabilities—including coordination, data sharing, and networking 
H. R. 3304—51 

arrangements—and such allied and partner capabilities should 

be taken into account in deciding on the deployment of regional 

missile defense capabilities of the United States; and 

(5) the United States should cooperate closely with the 

allies and partners of the United States, including such allies 

and partners in East Asia, on missile defense deployments 

and cooperation that enhance the mutual security of the United 

States and such allies and partners. 

SEC. 242. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PROCUREMENT OF CAPABILITY 

ENHANCEMENT II EXOATMOSPHERIC KILL VEHICLE. 

It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should 

not procure a Capability Enhancement II exoatmospheric kill 

vehicle for deployment until after the date on which a successful 

intercept flight test of the Capability Enhancement II ground-based 

interceptor has occurred, unless such procurement is for test assets 

or to maintain a warm line for the industrial base. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

SEC. 251. ANNUAL COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON THE AMPHIBIOUS COMBAT VEHICLE ACQUISITION PROGRAM. 

(a) ANNUAL GAO REVIEW.—During the period beginning on 

the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on March 1, 

2018, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct 

an annual review of the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition 

program. 

(b) ANNUAL REPORTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1 of each year 

beginning in 2014 and ending in 2018, the Comptroller General 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 

on the review of the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition 

program conducted under subsection (a). 

(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—Each report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: 

(A) The extent to which the program is meeting 

development and procurement cost, schedule, performance, 

and risk mitigation goals. 

(B) With respect to meeting the desired initial operational capability and full operational capability dates for 

the amphibious combat vehicle, the progress and results 

of— 

(i) developmental and operational testing of the 

vehicle; and 

(ii) plans for correcting deficiencies in vehicle 

performance, operational effectiveness, reliability, suitability, and safety. 

(C) An assessment of procurement plans, production 

results, and efforts to improve manufacturing efficiency 

and supplier performance. 

(D) An assessment of the acquisition strategy of the 

amphibious combat vehicle, including whether such 

strategy is in compliance with acquisition management 

best-practices and the acquisition policy and regulations 

of the Department of Defense. 
H. R. 3304—52 

(E) An assessment of the projected operations and support costs and the viability of the Marine Corps to afford 

to operate and sustain the amphibious combat vehicle. 

(3) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.—In submitting to the 

congressional defense committees the first report under paragraph (1) and a report following any changes made by the 

Secretary of the Navy to the baseline documentation of the 

amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program, the Comptroller General shall include, with respect to such program, 

an assessment of the sufficiency and objectivity of— 

(A) the analysis of alternatives; 

(B) the initial capabilities document; and 

(C) the capabilities development document. 

SEC. 252. ANNUAL COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES 

REPORT ON THE ACQUISITION PROGRAM FOR THE VXX 

PRESIDENTIAL HELICOPTER. 

(a) ANNUAL GAO REVIEW.—The Comptroller General of the 

United States shall conduct annually a review of the acquisition 

program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter aircraft. 

(b) ANNUAL REPORTS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1 each year, the 

Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report on the review conducted under subsection 

(a) during the preceding year. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under paragraph (1) shall 

include such matters as the Comptroller General considers 

appropriate to fully inform the congressional defense committees of the stage of the acquisition process for the VXX Presidential Helicopter aircraft covered by the review described in 

such report. Such matters may include the following: 

(A) The extent to which the acquisition program for 

the VXX Presidential Helicopter aircraft is meeting cost, 

schedule, and performance goals. 

(B) The progress and results of developmental testing. 

(C) An assessment of the acquisition strategy for the 

program, including whether the strategy is consistent with 

acquisition management best practices identified by the 

Comptroller General for purposes of the program. 

(c) SUNSET.—The requirements in this section shall terminate 

upon the earlier of— 

(1) the date on which the Navy awards a contract for 

full-rate production for the VXX Presidential Helicopter aircraft; 

or 

(2) the date on which the acquisition program for such 

aircraft is terminated. 

SEC. 253. REPORT ON STRATEGY TO IMPROVE BODY ARMOR. 

(a) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees a report on the comprehensive 

research and development strategy of the Secretary to achieve 

significant reductions in the weight of body armor. 

(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under subsection (a) shall 

include the following: 

(1) A brief description of each solution for body armor 

weight reduction that is being developed as of the date of 

the report. 
H. R. 3304—53 

(2) For each such solution— 

(A) the costs, schedules, and performance requirements; 

(B) the research and development funding profile; 

(C) a description of the materials being used in the 

solution; and 

(D) the feasibility and technology readiness levels of 

the solution and the materials. 

(3) A strategy to provide resources for future research 

and development of body armor weight reduction. 

(4) An explanation of how the Secretary is using a modular 

or tailorable solution to approach body armor weight reduction. 

(5) A description of how the Secretary coordinates the 

research and development of body armor weight reduction being 

carried out by the military departments. 

(6) Any other matter the Secretary considers appropriate. 

(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

SEC. 261. ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY REVIEW 

AND ADVISORY BOARD. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 7 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘§ 189. Communications Security Review and Advisory Board 

‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There shall be in the Department of 

Defense a Communications Security Review and Advisory Board 

(in this section referred to as the ‘Board’) to review and assess 

the communications security, cryptographic modernization, and 

related key management activities of the Department and provide 

advice to the Secretary with respect to such activities. 

‘‘(b) MEMBERS.—(1) The Secretary shall determine the number 

of members of the Board. 

‘‘(2) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense 

shall serve as chairman of the Board. 

‘‘(3) The Secretary shall appoint officers in the grade of general 

or admiral and civilian employees of the Department of Defense 

in the Senior Executive Service to serve as members of the Board. 

‘‘(c) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Board shall— 

‘‘(1) monitor the overall communications security, cryptographic modernization, and key management efforts of the 

Department, including activities under major defense acquisition programs (as defined in section 139c of this title), by— 

‘‘(A) requiring each Chief Information Officer of each 

military department to report the communications security 

activities of the military department to the Board; 

‘‘(B) tracking compliance of each military department 

with respect to communications security modernization 

efforts; 

‘‘(C) validating lifecycle communications security modernization plans for major defense acquisition programs; 

‘‘(2) validate the need to replace cryptographic equipment 

based on the expiration dates of the equipment and evaluate 
H. R. 3304—54 

the risks of continuing to use cryptographic equipment after 

such expiration dates; 

‘‘(3) convene in-depth program reviews for specific cryptographic modernization developments with respect to validating requirements and identifying programmatic risks; 

‘‘(4) develop a long-term roadmap for communications security to identify potential issues and ensure synchronization 

with major planning documents; and 

‘‘(5) advise the Secretary on the cryptographic posture of 

the Department, including budgetary recommendations. 

‘‘(d) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN PROGRAMS.—The Board shall not 

include the consideration of programs funded under the National 

Intelligence Program (as defined in section 3(6) of the National 

Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(6))) in carrying out this section.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating 

to section 188 the following new item: 

‘‘189. Communications Security Review and Advisory Board’’. 

SEC. 262. EXTENSION AND EXPANSION OF MECHANISMS TO PROVIDE 

FUNDS FOR DEFENSE LABORATORIES FOR RESEARCH AND 

DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGIES FOR MILITARY MISSIONS. 

(a) CLARIFICATION OF AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Section 219 

of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)(1)(D), by striking ‘‘and recapitalization’’ 

through the period at the end and inserting ‘‘recapitalization, 

or minor military construction of the laboratory infrastructure, 

in accordance with subsection (b).’’; 

(2) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections 

(c) and (d), respectively; and 

(3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): 

‘‘(b) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the provisions of this subsection, funds available under a mechanism under subsection 

(a)(1)(D) that are solely intended to carry out a laboratory 

infrastructure project shall be available for such project until 

expended. 

‘‘(2) PRIOR NOTICE OF COSTS OF PROJECTS.—Funds shall 

be available in accordance with paragraph (1) for a project 

referred to in such paragraph only if the Secretary notifies 

the congressional defense committees of the total cost of the 

project before the date on which the Secretary uses a mechanism under subsection (a)(1)(D) for such project. 

‘‘(3) ACCUMULATION OF FUNDS FOR PROJECTS.—Funds may 

accumulate under a mechanism under subsection (a) for a 

project referred to in paragraph (1) for not more than five 

years. 

‘‘(4) COST LIMIT COMPLIANCE.—The Secretary shall ensure 

that a project referred to in paragraph (1) for which funds 

are made available in accordance with such paragraph complies 

with the applicable cost limitations in the following provisions 

of law: 
H. R. 3304—55 

‘‘(A) Section 2805(d) of title 10, United States Code, 

with respect to revitalization and recapitalization projects. 

‘‘(B) Section 2811 of such title, with respect to repair 

projects.’’. 

(b) EXTENSION.—Subsection (d) of such section, as redesignated 

by subsection (a)(2) of this section, is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2016’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2020’’. 

(c) APPLICATION.—Subsection (b) of such section 219, as added 

by subsection (a)(3), shall apply with respect to funds made available under such section on or after the date of the enactment 

of this Act. 

SEC. 263. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO AWARD PRIZES FOR 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ACHIEVEMENTS. 

Section 2374a(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘September 30, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 

2018’’. 

SEC. 264. FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM TO INCLUDE 

TECHNOLOGY PROTECTION FEATURES DURING 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN DEFENSE 

SYSTEMS. 

Section 243(d) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 

2358 note) is amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 2015’’ and inserting 

‘‘October 1, 2020’’. 

SEC. 265. BRIEFING ON BIOMETRICS ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT 

OF DEFENSE. 

(a) BRIEFING REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives on an assessment of the future program 

structure for biometrics oversight and execution and architectural 

requirements for biometrics-enabling capability. 

(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The briefing under subsection (a) shall 

include the following: 

(1) An assessment of the roles and responsibilities of the 

principal staff assistant for biometrics, the program manager 

for biometrics, and the Defense Forensics and Biometrics 

Agency, including— 

(A) the roles and responsibilities of each element of 

the Department of Defense, including each military department, with responsibility for biometrics and each such element that is responsible for requirements and testing 

regarding biometrics; and 

(B) whether the executive management responsibilities 

of the Department of Defense program manager for biometrics should be retained by the Army or transferred 

to another element of the Department. 

(2) An assessment of the current requirements for biometrics-enabling capability, including with respect to— 

(A) a governance process for capturing, vetting, and 

validating requirements and business processes across military department, interagency, and international partners; 

and 

(B) a process to determine resourcing business rules 

to establish and sustain such capabilities. 
H. R. 3304—56 

(3) An evaluation of the most appropriate element of the 

Department to take responsibility for defining and managing 

the end-to-end performance of the biometric enterprise, beginning and ending at the point of biometric encounter, as 

described in the report of the Comptroller General of the United 

States titled ‘‘Defense Biometrics: Additional Training for 

Leaders and More Timely Transmission of Data Could Enhance 

the Use of Biometrics in Afghanistan’’, numbered 12–442. 

SEC. 266. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON IMPORTANCE OF ALIGNING 

COMMON MISSILE COMPARTMENT OF OHIO-CLASS 

REPLACEMENT PROGRAM WITH THE UNITED KINGDOM’S 

VANGUARD SUCCESSOR PROGRAM. 

It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense and 

the Secretary of the Navy should make every effort to ensure 

that the common missile compartment associated with the Ohioclass ballistic missile submarine replacement program stays on 

schedule and is aligned with the Vanguard-successor program of 

the United Kingdom in order for the United States to fulfill its 

longstanding commitment to our ally and partner in sea-based 

strategic deterrence. 

SEC. 267. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COUNTER-ELECTRONICS HIGH 

POWER MICROWAVE MISSILE PROJECT. 

It is the sense of the Congress that— 

(1) in carrying out the non-kinetic counter-electronics 

developmental planning effort of the Air Force, the Secretary 

of Defense should consider the results of the successful joint 

technology capability demonstration that the counter-electronics high power microwave missile project conducted in 2012; 

(2) an analysis of alternatives is an important step in 

the long-term development of a non-kinetic counter-electronic 

system; 

(3) the Secretary should pursue both near- and far-term 

joint non-kinetic counter-electronic systems; and 

(4) the counter-electronics high power microwave missile 

project (or a variant thereof) should be considered among the 

options for a possible materiel solution in response to any 

near-term joint urgent operational need, joint emergent operational need, or combatant command integrated priority for 

a non-kinetic counter-electronic system. 

TITLE III—OPERATION AND 

MAINTENANCE 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding. 

Subtitle B—Energy and Environment 

Sec. 311. Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets for activities relating to operational energy strategy. 

Sec. 312. Facilitation of interagency cooperation in conservation programs of the 

Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and Interior to avoid or reduce adverse impacts on military readiness activities. 

Sec. 313. Reauthorization of Sikes Act. 

Sec. 314. Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in open-air burn pits. 

Sec. 315. Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of drop-in fuels. 
H. R. 3304—57 

Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment 

Sec. 321. Strategic policy for prepositioned materiel and equipment. 

Sec. 322. Department of Defense manufacturing arsenal study and report. 

Sec. 323. Consideration of Army arsenals’ capabilities to fulfill manufacturing requirements. Sec. 324. Strategic policy for the retrograde, reconstitution, and replacement of operating forces used to support overseas contingency operations. Sec. 325. Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan. 

Sec. 326. Strategy for improving asset tracking and in-transit visibility. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

Sec. 331. Additional reporting requirements relating to personnel and unit readiness. Sec. 332. Modification of authorities on prioritization of funds for equipment readiness and strategic capability. Sec. 333. Revision to requirement for annual submission of information regarding 

information technology capital assets. Sec. 334. Modification of annual corrosion control and prevention reporting requirements. 

Subtitle E—Limitations and Extensions of Authority 

Sec. 341. Certification for realignment of forces at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores. 

Sec. 342. Limitation on performance of Department of Defense flight demonstration 

teams outside the United States. 

Sec. 343. Limitation on funding for United States Special Operations Command 

National Capital Region. Sec. 344. Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional Web Initiative. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Sec. 351. Gifts made for the benefit of military musical units. 

Sec. 352. Revised policy on ground combat and camouflage utility uniforms. 

Subtitle A—Authorization of 

Appropriations 

SEC. 301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDING. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and 

agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise 

provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the 

funding table in section 4301. 

Subtitle B—Energy and Environment 

SEC. 311. DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF REPORTS ON PROPOSED 

BUDGETS FOR ACTIVITIES RELATING TO OPERATIONAL 

ENERGY STRATEGY. 

Section 138c(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘Not later than 30 days 

after the date on which the budget for a fiscal year is submitted 

to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the Secretary 

of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the proposed 

budgets for that fiscal year’’ and inserting ‘‘The Secretary of 

Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the proposed 

budgets for a fiscal year’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(6) The report required by paragraph (4) for a fiscal year 

shall be submitted by the later of the following dates: 

‘‘(A) The date that is 30 days after the date on which 

the budget for that fiscal year is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31. 
H. R. 3304—58 

‘‘(B) March 31 of the previous fiscal year.’’. 

SEC. 312. FACILITATION OF INTERAGENCY COOPERATION IN CONSERVATION PROGRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENTS OF 

DEFENSE, AGRICULTURE, AND INTERIOR TO AVOID OR 

REDUCE ADVERSE IMPACTS ON MILITARY READINESS 

ACTIVITIES. 

(a) USE OF FUNDS UNDER CERTAIN AGREEMENTS.—Section 

2684a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections 

(i) and (j), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new subsection (h): 

‘‘(h) INTERAGENCY COOPERATION IN CONSERVATION PROGRAMS

TO AVOID OR REDUCE ADVERSE IMPACTS ON MILITARY READINESS

ACTIVITIES.—In order to facilitate interagency cooperation and 

enhance the effectiveness of actions that will protect both the 

environment and military readiness, the recipient of funds provided 

pursuant an agreement under this section or under the Sikes Act 

(16 U.S.C. et seq.) may, with regard to the lands and waters 

within the scope of the agreement, use such funds to satisfy any 

matching funds or cost-sharing requirement of any conservation 

program of the Department of Agriculture or the Department of 

the Interior notwithstanding any limitation of such program on 

the source of matching or cost-sharing funds.’’. 

(b) SUNSET.—This section and subsection (h) of section 2684a 

of title 10, United States Code, as added by this section, shall 

expire on October 1, 2019, except that any agreement referred 

to in such subsection that is entered into on or before September 

30, 2019, shall continue according to its terms and conditions as 

if this section has not expired. 

SEC. 313. REAUTHORIZATION OF SIKES ACT. 

Section 108 of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670f) is amended 

by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2009 through 2014’’ each place it appears 

and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2014 through 2019’’. 

SEC. 314. CLARIFICATION OF PROHIBITION ON DISPOSING OF WASTE 

IN OPEN-AIR BURN PITS. 

Section 317(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2249; 10 U.S.C. 

2701 note) is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’; 

(2) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph 

(Q); and 

(3) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new 

subparagraphs: 

‘‘(C) tires; 

‘‘(D) treated wood; 

‘‘(E) batteries; 

‘‘(F) plastics, except insignificant amounts of plastic 

remaining after a good-faith effort to remove or recover 

plastic materials from the solid waste stream; 

‘‘(G) munitions and explosives, except when disposed 

of in compliance with guidance on the destruction of munitions and explosives contained in the Department of 

Defense Ammunition and Explosives Safety Standards, 

DoD Manual 6055.09-M; 
H. R. 3304—59 

‘‘(H) compressed gas cylinders, unless empty with 

valves removed; 

‘‘(I) fuel containers, unless completely evacuated of its 

contents; 

‘‘(J) aerosol cans; 

‘‘(K) polychlorinated biphenyls; 

‘‘(L) petroleum, oils, and lubricants products (other 

than waste fuel for initial combustion); 

‘‘(M) asbestos; 

‘‘(N) mercury; 

‘‘(O) foam tent material; 

‘‘(P) any item containing any of the materials referred 

to in a preceding paragraph; and’’. 

SEC. 315. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR PROCUREMENT OF DROP-IN FUELS. 

(a) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 

2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended 

to make a bulk purchase of a drop-in fuel for operational purposes 

unless the cost of that drop-in fuel is cost-competitive with the 

cost of a traditional fuel available for the same purpose. 

(b) WAIVER.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the requirements of paragraph 

(2), the Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation under 

subparagraph (a) with respect to a purchase. 

(2) NOTICE REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after issuing 

a waiver under this subsection, the Secretary shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees notice of the waiver. 

Any such notice shall include each of the following: 

(A) The rationale of the Secretary for issuing the 

waiver 

(B) A certification that the waiver is in the national 

security interest of the United States. 

(C) The expected cost of the purchase for which the 

waiver is issued. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—For the purposes of this section— 

(1) The term ‘‘drop-in fuel’’ means a neat or blended liquid 

hydrocarbon fuel designed as a direct replacement for a traditional fuel with comparable performance characteristics and 

compatible with existing infrastructure and equipment 

(2) The term ‘‘traditional fuel’’ means a liquid hydrocarbon 

fuel derived or refined from petroleum. 

(3) The term ‘‘operational purposes’’ means for the purposes 

of conducting military operations, including training, exercises, 

large scale demonstrations, and moving and sustaining military 

forces and military platforms. Such term does not include 

research, development, testing, evaluation, fuel certification, 

or other demonstrations. 

Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment 

SEC. 321. STRATEGIC POLICY FOR PREPOSITIONED MATERIEL AND 

EQUIPMENT. 

(a) MODIFICATIONS TO STRATEGIC POLICY.—Section 2229(a) of 

title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
H. R. 3304—60 

‘‘(a) POLICY REQUIRED.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall maintain 

a strategic policy on the programs of the Department of Defense 

for prepositioned materiel and equipment. Such policy shall 

take into account national security threats, strategic mobility, 

service requirements, and the requirements of the combatant 

commands, and shall address how the Department’s 

prepositioning programs, both ground and afloat, align with 

national defense strategies and departmental priorities. 

‘‘(2) ELEMENTS.—The strategic policy required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: 

‘‘(A) Overarching strategic guidance concerning planning and resource priorities that link the Department of 

Defense’s current and future needs for prepositioned stocks, 

such as desired responsiveness, to evolving national defense 

objectives. 

‘‘(B) A description of the Department’s vision for 

prepositioning programs and the desired end state. 

‘‘(C) Specific interim goals demonstrating how the 

vision and end state will be achieved. 

‘‘(D) A description of the strategic environment, 

requirements for, and challenges associated with, 

prepositioning. 

‘‘(E) Metrics for how the Department will evaluate 

the extent to which prepositioned assets are achieving 

defense objectives. 

‘‘(F) A framework for joint departmental oversight that 

reviews and synchronizes the military services’ 

prepositioning strategies to minimize potentially duplicative efforts and maximize efficiencies in prepositioned materiel and equipment across the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(3) JOINT OVERSIGHT.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

establish joint oversight of the military services’ prepositioning 

efforts to maximize efficiencies across the Department of 

Defense.’’. 

(b) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for 

implementation of the prepositioning strategic policy required 

under section 2229(a) of title 10, United States Code, as 

amended by subsection (a). 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The implementation plan required under 

paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: 

(A) Detailed guidance for how the Department of 

Defense will achieve the vision, end state, and goals outlined in the strategic policy. 

(B) A comprehensive list of the Department’s 

prepositioned materiel and equipment programs. 

(C) A detailed description of how the plan will be 

implemented. 

(D) A schedule with milestones for the implementation 

of the plan. 

(E) An assignment of roles and responsibilities for the 

implementation of the plan. 

(F) A description of the resources required to implement the plan. 
H. R. 3304—61 

(G) A description of how the plan will be reviewed 

and assessed to monitor progress. 

(c) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, 

the Comptroller General of the United States shall review the 

implementation plan submitted under subsection (b) and the 

prepositioning strategic policy required under section 2229(a) of 

title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), and 

submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing 

the findings of such review and including any additional information 

relating to the propositioning strategic policy and plan that the 

Comptroller General determines appropriate. 

SEC. 322. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MANUFACTURING ARSENAL 

STUDY AND REPORT. 

(a) REVIEW.— 

(1) MANUFACTURING REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary of 

Defense, in consultation with the military services and Defense 

Agencies, shall review— 

(A) current and expected manufacturing requirements 

across the military services and Defense Agencies to identify critical manufacturing competencies and supplies, 

components, end items, parts, assemblies, and sub-assemblies for which there is no or limited domestic commercial 

source and which are appropriate for manufacturing within 

an arsenal owned by the United States in order to support 

critical manufacturing capabilities; 

(B) how the Department of Defense can more effectively 

use and manage public-private partnerships to preserve 

critical industrial capabilities at such arsenals for future 

national security requirements while providing to the 

Department of the Army a return on its investment; 

(C) the effectiveness of the strategy of the Department 

of Defense to assign workload to each of the arsenals and 

the potential for alternative strategies that could better 

identify workload for each arsenal; 

(D) the impact of the rate structure driven by the 

Department of the Army working-capital funds on publicprivate partnerships at each such arsenal; 

(E) the extent to which operations at each such arsenal 

can be streamlined, improved, or enhanced; and 

(F) the effectiveness of the implementation by the 

Department of the Army of cooperative agreements authorized at manufacturing arsenals under section 4544 of title 

10, United States Code. 

(2) MECHANISMS FOR DETERMINING MANUFACTURING

CAPABILITIES.—The Secretary shall review mechanisms within 

the Department of Defense for ensuring that appropriate 

consideration is given to the unique manufacturing capabilities 

of arsenals owned by the United States to fulfill manufacturing 

requirements of the Department of Defense for which there 

is no or limited domestic commercial capability. 

(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a report that includes 

the results of the reviews conducted under subsection (a) and a 
H. R. 3304—62 

description of actions planned to support critical manufacturing 

capabilities within arsenals owned by the United States. 

(c) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than one year 

after the date on which the report required under subsection (b) 

is submitted, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing an assessment of 

the report together with the recommendations of the Comptroller 

General to improve the strategy of the Department of Defense 

to assign workload. 

SEC. 323. CONSIDERATION OF ARMY ARSENALS’ CAPABILITIES TO FULFILL MANUFACTURING REQUIREMENTS. 

(a) CONSIDERATION OF CAPABILITY OF ARSENALS.—When undertaking a make-or-buy analysis, a program executive officer or program manager of a military service or Defense Agency shall consider 

the capability of arsenals owned by the United States to fulfill 

a manufacturing requirement. 

(b) NOTIFICATION OF SOLICITATIONS.—Not later than 180 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

shall establish and begin implementation of a system for ensuring 

that the arsenals owned by the United States are notified of any 

solicitation that fulfills a manufacturing requirement for which 

there is no or limited domestic commercial source and which may 

be appropriate for manufacturing within an arsenal owned by the 

United States. 

SEC. 324. STRATEGIC POLICY FOR THE RETROGRADE, RECONSTITUTION, AND REPLACEMENT OF OPERATING FORCES USED 

TO SUPPORT OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF POLICY.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish 

a policy setting forth the programs and priorities of the Department of Defense for the retrograde, reconstitution, and replacement of units and materiel used to support overseas contingency 

operations. The policy shall take into account national security 

threats, the requirements of the combatant commands, the 

current readiness of the operating forces of the military departments, and risk associated with strategic depth and the time 

necessary to reestablish required personnel, equipment, and 

training readiness in such operating forces. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The policy required under paragraph (1) 

shall include the following elements: 

(A) Establishment and assignment of responsibilities 

and authorities within the Department for oversight and 

execution of the planning, organization, and management 

of the programs to reestablish the readiness of redeployed 

operating forces. 

(B) Guidance concerning priorities, goals, objectives, 

timelines, and resources to reestablish the readiness of 

redeployed operating forces in support of national defense 

objectives and combatant command requirements. 

(C) Oversight reporting requirements and metrics for 

the evaluation of Department of Defense and military 

department progress on restoring the readiness of 

redeployed operating forces in accordance with the policy 

required under paragraph (1). 

(D) A framework for joint departmental reviews of 

military services’ annual budgets proposed for retrograde, 
H. R. 3304—63 

reconstitution, or replacement activities, including an 

assessment of the strategic and operational risk assumed 

by the proposed levels of investment across the Department 

of Defense. 

(b) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for 

implementation of the policy required under this section. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The implementation plan required under 

paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: 

(A) The assignment of responsibilities and authorities 

for oversight and execution of the planning, organization, 

and management of the programs to reestablish the readiness of redeployed operating forces. 

(B) Establishment of priorities, goals, objectives, 

timelines, and resources to reestablish the readiness of 

redeployed operating forces in support of national defense 

objectives and combatant command requirements. 

(C) A description of how the plan will be implemented, 

including a schedule with milestones to meet the goals 

of the plan. 

(D) An estimate of the resources by military service 

and by year required to implement the plan, including 

an assessment of the risks assumed in the plan. 

(3) UPDATES.—Not later than one year after submitting 

the plan required under paragraph (1), and annually thereafter 

for two years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees an update on progress toward 

meeting the goals of the plan. 

(c) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than 120 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually after 

the submittal of each update to the implementation plan under 

subsection (b), the Comptroller General of the United States shall 

review the implementation plan submitted under subsection (b) 

and the policy required by subsection (a), and submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the findings of such 

review and progress made toward meeting the goals of the plan 

and including any additional information relating to the policy 

and plan that the Comptroller General determines appropriate. 

SEC. 325. LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP STRATEGIC SUSTAINMENT PLAN. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees and to the Comptroller 

General of the United States a strategic sustainment plan for 

the Littoral Combat Ship. Such plan shall include each of the 

following: 

(1) An estimate of the cost and schedule of implementing 

the plan. 

(2) An identification of the requirements and planning for 

the long-term sustainment of the Littoral Combat Ship and 

its mission modules in accordance with section 2366b of title 

10, United States Code, as amended by section 801 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public 

Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1482). 
H. R. 3304—64 

(3) A description of the current and future operating 

environments of the Littoral Combat Ship, as specified or 

referred to in strategic guidance and planning documents of 

the Department of Defense. 

(4) The facility, supply, and logistics systems requirements, 

including contractor support, of the Littoral Combat Ship when 

forward deployed, and an estimate of the cost and personnel 

required to conduct the necessary maintenance activities. 

(5) Any required updates to host-nation agreements to 

facilitate the forward-deployed maintenance requirements of 

the Littoral Combat Ship, including a discussion of overseas 

management of Ship ordnance and hazardous materials and 

delivery of equipment and spare parts needed for emergent 

repair. 

(6) An evaluation of the forward-deployed maintenance 

requirements of the Littoral Combat Ship and a schedule of 

pier-side maintenance timelines when forward-deployed, 

including requirements for multiple ships and variants. 

(7) An assessment of the total quantity of equipment, spare 

parts, permanently forward-stationed personnel, and size of 

fly away teams required to support forward-deployed maintenance requirements for the U.S.S. Freedom while in Singapore, 

and estimates for follow-on deployments of Littoral Combat 

Ships of both variants. 

(8) A detailed description of the continuity of operations 

plans for the Littoral Combat Ship Squadron and of any plans 

to increase the number of Squadron personnel. 

(9) An identification of mission critical single point of 

failure equipment for which a sufficient number spare parts 

are necessary to have on hand, and determination of Littoral 

Combat Ship forward deployed equipment and spare parts locations and levels. 

(b) FORM.—The plan required under subsection (a) shall be 

submitted in unclassified form but may have a classified annex. 

SEC. 326. STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING ASSET TRACKING AND INTRANSIT VISIBILITY. 

(a) STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION PLANS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a comprehensive strategy for improving asset tracking and in-transit visibility across the Department of Defense, together with the 

plans of the military departments for implementing the 

strategy. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The strategy and implementation plans 

required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: 

(A) The overarching goals and objectives desired from 

implementation of the strategy. 

(B) A description of steps to achieve those goals and 

objectives, as well as milestones and performance measures 

to gauge results. 
H. R. 3304—65 

(C) An estimate of the costs associated with executing 

the plan, and the sources and types of resources and investments, including skills, technology, human capital, information, and other resources, required to meet the goals and 

objectives. 

(D) A description of roles and responsibilities for managing and overseeing the implementation of the strategy, 

including the role of program managers, and the establishment of mechanisms for multiple stakeholders to coordinate 

their efforts throughout implementation and make necessary adjustments to the strategy based on performance. 

(E) A description of key factors external to the Department of Defense and beyond its control that could significantly affect the achievement of the long-term goals contained in the strategy. 

(F) A detailed description of asset marking requirements and how automated information and data capture 

technologies could improve readiness, cost effectiveness, 

and performance. 

(G) A defined list of all categories of items that program 

managers are required to identify for the purposes of asset 

marking. 

(H) A description of steps to improve asset tracking 

and in-transit visibility for classified programs. 

(I) Steps to be undertaken to facilitate collaboration 

with industry designed to capture best practices, lessons 

learned, and any relevant technical matters. 

(J) A description of how improved asset tracking and 

in-transit visibility could enhance audit readiness, reduce 

counterfeit risk, enhance logistical processes, and otherwise 

benefit the Department of Defense. 

(K) An operational security assessment designed to 

ensure that all Department of Defense assets are appropriately protected during the execution of the strategy and 

implementation plan. 

(b) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than one year 

after the strategy is submitted under subsection (a), the Comptroller 

General of the United States shall submit to the congressional 

defense committees a report setting forth an assessment of the 

extent to which the strategy and accompanying implementation 

plans— 

(1) include the elements set forth under subsection (a)(2); 

(2) align to achieve the overarching asset tracking and 

in-transit visibility goals and objectives of the Department of 

Defense; 

(3) incorporate, as appropriate, industry best practices 

related to automated information and data capture technologies 

for asset tracking and in-transit visibility; 

(4) effectively execute the policies prescribed in Department 

of Defense Instruction 8320.04; and 

(5) have been implemented. 
H. R. 3304—66 

Subtitle D—Reports 

SEC. 331. ADDITIONAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO PERSONNEL AND UNIT READINESS. 

(a) ASSESSMENT OF ASSIGNED MISSIONS AND CONTRACTOR SUPPORT.—Section 482 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘The report for a quarter’’ and inserting 

‘‘Each report’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘(e), and (f)’’ and inserting ‘‘(f), (g), 

(h), (i), (j), and (k), and the reports for the second and 

fourth quarters of a calendar year shall also contain the 

information required by subsection (e)’’; 

(2) in subsection (d)— 

(A) in paragraph (1)— 

(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘, including 

the extent’’ and all that follows through the period 

at the end and inserting the following: ‘‘, including 

an assessment of the manning of units (authorized 

versus assigned numbers of personnel) for units not 

scheduled for deployment and the timing of the arrival 

of personnel into units preparing for deployments.’’; 

and 

(ii) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘unit’’ before 

‘‘personnel strength’’; 

(B) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows: 

‘‘(2) PERSONNEL TURBULENCE.— ‘‘(A) Recruit quality. 

‘‘(B) Personnel assigned to a unit but not trained for 

the level of assigned responsibility or mission. 

‘‘(C) Fitness for deployment. 

‘‘(D) Recruiting and retention status.’’; 

(C) by striking paragraph (3) and redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (3); and 

(D) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(C), by striking ‘‘Training commitments’’ and inserting 

‘‘Mission rehearsals’’; 

(3) by redesignating subsections (e), (f), and (g), as subsections (f), (g), and (l), respectively; 

(4) by inserting after subsection (d)(3), as redesignated 

by paragraph (1)(C), the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) LOGISTICS INDICATORS.—The reports for the second and 

fourth quarters of a calendar year shall also include information 

regarding the active components of the armed forces (and an evaluation of such information) with respect to each of the following 

logistics indicators:’’; 

(5) in subsection (e), as designated by paragraph (4)— 

(A) by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), and (7) as 

paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; 

(B) in paragraph (1), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(A), by striking subparagraph (E); and 

(C) in paragraph (2), as so redesignated— 

(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘Maintenance’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Depot maintenance’’; and 

(ii) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new subparagraph: 
H. R. 3304—67 

‘‘(B) Equipment not available due to a lack of supplies 

or parts.’’; and 

(6) by inserting after subsection (g), as redesignated by 

paragraph (3), the following new subsections: 

‘‘(h) COMBATANT COMMAND ASSIGNED MISSION ASSESSMENTS.— 

(1) Each report shall also include an assessment by each commander 

of a geographic or functional combatant command of the ability 

of the command to successfully execute each of the assigned missions of the command. Each such assessment for a combatant 

command shall also include a list of the mission essential tasks 

for each assigned mission of the command and an assessment 

of the ability of the command to successfully complete each task 

within prescribed timeframes. 

‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘assigned mission’ 

means any contingency response program plan, theater campaign 

plan, or named operation that is approved and assigned by the 

Joint Chiefs of Staff. 

‘‘(i) RISK ASSESSMENT OF DEPENDENCE ON CONTRACTOR SUPPORT.—Each report shall also include an assessment by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the level of risk incurred by 

using contract support in contingency operations as required under 

Department of Defense Instruction 1100.22, ‘Policies and Procedures 

for Determining Workforce Mix’. 

‘‘(j) COMBAT SUPPORT AGENCIES ASSESSMENT.—(1) Each report 

shall also include an assessment by the Secretary of Defense of 

the military readiness of the combat support agencies, including, 

for each such agency— 

‘‘(A) a determination with respect to the responsiveness 

and readiness of the agency to support operating forces in 

the event of a war or threat to national security, including— 

‘‘(i) a list of mission essential tasks and an assessment 

of the ability of the agency to successfully perform those 

tasks; 

‘‘(ii) an assessment of how the ability of the agency 

to accomplish the tasks referred to in subparagraph (A) 

affects the ability of the military departments and the 

unified and geographic combatant commands to execute 

operations and contingency plans by number; 

‘‘(iii) any readiness deficiencies and actions recommended to address such deficiencies; and 

‘‘(iv) key indicators and other relevant information 

related to any deficiency or other problem identified; 

‘‘(B) any recommendations that the Secretary considers 

appropriate. 

‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘combat support agency’ means 

any of the following Defense Agencies: 

‘‘(A) The Defense Information Systems Agency. 

‘‘(B) The Defense Intelligence Agency. 

‘‘(C) The Defense Logistics Agency. 

‘‘(D) The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (but only 

with respect to combat support functions that the agencies 

perform for the Department of Defense). 

‘‘(E) The Defense Contract Management Agency. 

‘‘(F) The Defense Threat Reduction Agency. 

‘‘(G) The National Reconnaissance Office. 
H. R. 3304—68 

‘‘(H) The National Security Agency (but only with respect 

to combat support functions that the agencies perform for the 

Department of Defense) and Central Security Service. 

‘‘(I) Any other Defense Agency designated as a combat 

support agency by the Secretary of Defense. 

‘‘(k) MAJOR EXERCISE ASSESSMENTS.—(1) Each report shall also 

include an after-action assessment of each major exercise by the 

commander of the geographic or functional combatant command 

concerned or the chief of the military service concerned, as appropriate, that includes— 

‘‘(A) a brief description of the exercise; 

‘‘(B) planned training objectives for the exercise; 

‘‘(C) a full summary of cost associated with the exercise, 

including in-kind and direct contributions to allies and partners; 

and 

‘‘(D) an executive summary of the lessons learned and 

training objectives met by conducting the exercise. 

‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘major exercise’ means a named 

major training event, an integrated or joint exercise, or a unilateral 

major exercise.’’. 

SEC. 332. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES ON PRIORITIZATION OF 

FUNDS FOR EQUIPMENT READINESS AND STRATEGIC 

CAPABILITY. 

(a) INCLUSION OF MARINE CORPS IN REQUIREMENTS.—Section 

323 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2007 (10 U.S.C. 229 note) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (2) and inserting 

the following new paragraph (2): 

‘‘(2) the Secretary of the Army to meet the requirements 

of the Army, and the Secretary of the Navy to meet the requirements of the Marine Corps, for that fiscal year, in addition 

to the requirements under paragraph (1), for the reconstitution 

of equipment and materiel in prepositioned stocks in accordance 

with requirements under the policy or strategy implemented 

under the guidelines in section 2229 of title 10, United States 

Code.’’; and 

(2) in subsection (b)(2), by striking subparagraph (B) and 

inserting the following new subparagraph (B): 

‘‘(B) the Army and the Marine Corps for the reconstitution of equipment and materiel in prepositioned stocks.’’. 

(b) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR ANNUAL ARMY REPORT AND

GAO REVIEW.—Such section is further amended by striking subsections (c) through (f) and inserting the following new subsection 

(c): 

‘‘(c) CONTINGENCY OPERATION DEFINED.—In this section, the 

term ‘contingency operation’ has the meaning given that term in 

section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code.’’. 

SEC. 333. REVISION TO REQUIREMENT FOR ANNUAL SUBMISSION OF 

INFORMATION REGARDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 

CAPITAL ASSETS. 

Section 351(a)(1) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 

221 note) is amended by striking ‘‘in excess of $30,000,000’’ and 

all that follows and inserting ‘‘(as computed in fiscal year 2000 

constant dollars) in excess of $32,000,000 or an estimated total 

cost for the future-years defense program for which the budget 
H. R. 3304—69 

is submitted (as computed in fiscal year 2000 constant dollars) 

in excess of $378,000,000, for all expenditures, for all increments, 

regardless of the appropriation and fund source, directly related 

to the assets definition, design, development, deployment, 

sustainment, and disposal.’’. 

SEC. 334. MODIFICATION OF ANNUAL CORROSION CONTROL AND 

PREVENTION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

Section 903(b)(5) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 

U.S.C. 2228 note) is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(5)’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(B) The report required under subparagraph (A) shall— 

‘‘(i) provide a clear linkage between the corrosion control 

and prevention program of the military department and the 

overarching goals and objectives of the long-term corrosion control and prevention strategy developed and implemented by 

the Secretary of Defense under section 2228(d) of title 10, 

United States Code; and 

‘‘(ii) include performance measures to ensure that the corrosion control and prevention program is achieving the goals 

and objectives described in clause (i).’’. 

Subtitle E—Limitations and Extensions of 

Authority 

SEC. 341. CERTIFICATION FOR REALIGNMENT OF FORCES AT LAJES 

AIR FORCE BASE, AZORES. 

The Secretary of Defense shall certify to the congressional 

defense committees, prior to taking any action to realign forces 

at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, that the action is supported by 

a European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment initiated by 

the Secretary of Defense on January 25, 2013. The certification 

shall include a specific assessment of the efficacy of Lajes Air 

Force Base, Azores, in support of the United States overseas force 

posture. 

SEC. 342. LIMITATION ON PERFORMANCE OF DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE FLIGHT DEMONSTRATION TEAMS OUTSIDE THE 

UNITED STATES. 

If, during fiscal year 2014 or 2015, any performance by a 

flight demonstration team under the jurisdiction of the Secretary 

of Defense that is scheduled for a location within the United States 

is cancelled by reason of budget reductions made pursuant to an 

order for sequestration issued by the President under section 251A 

of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, 

then no such flight demonstration team may perform at any location 

outside the United States during such fiscal year. 

SEC. 343. LIMITATION ON FUNDING FOR UNITED STATES SPECIAL 

OPERATIONS COMMAND NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION. 

(a) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 

2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended 

for the United States Special Operations Command National Capital 
H. R. 3304—70 

Region (USSOCOM–NCR) until 30 days after the Secretary of 

Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report 

on the USSOCOM–NCR. 

(b) REPORT ELEMENTS.—The report required under subsection 

(a) shall include the following elements: 

(1) A description of the purpose of the USSOCOM-NCR. 

(2) A description of the activities to be performed by the 

USSOCOM–NCR. 

(3) An explanation of the impact of the USSOCOM-NCR 

on existing activities at United States Special Operations Command headquarters. 

(4) A detailed, by fiscal year, breakout of the staffing and 

other costs associated with the USSOCOM-NCR over the 

future-years defense program. 

(5) A description of the relationship between the 

USSOCOM-NCR and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of 

Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict. 

(6) A description of the role of the Assistant Secretary 

of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict 

in providing oversight of USSOCOM-NCR activities. 

(7) Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate. 

SEC. 344. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR TRANS 

REGIONAL WEB INITIATIVE. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in subsection (b), none 

of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 

for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for 

the Trans Regional Web Initiative. 

(b) EXCEPTION.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), of the 

amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 301 for operation 

and maintenance, Defense-wide, not more than $2,000,000 may 

be obligated or expended for— 

(1) the termination of the Trans Regional Web Initiative 

as managed by Special Operations Command; or 

(2) transitioning appropriate capabilities of such Initiative 

to other agencies. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

SEC. 351. GIFTS MADE FOR THE BENEFIT OF MILITARY MUSICAL 

UNITS. 

Section 974 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections 

(e) and (f), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following: 

‘‘(d) PRIVATE DONATIONS.—(1) The Secretary concerned may 

accept contributions of money, personal property, or services on 

the condition that such money, property, or services be used for 

the benefit of a military musical unit under the jurisdiction of 

the Secretary. 

‘‘(2) Any contribution of money under paragraph (1) shall be 

credited to the appropriation or account providing the funds for 

such military musical unit. Any amount so credited shall be merged 

with amounts in the appropriation or account to which credited, 

and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the 
H. R. 3304—71 

same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such appropriation 

or account. 

‘‘(3) Not later than January 30 of each year, the Secretary 

concerned shall submit to Congress a report on any contributions 

of money, personal property, and services accepted under paragraph 

(1) during the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year during which 

the report is submitted.’’. 

SEC. 352. REVISED POLICY ON GROUND COMBAT AND CAMOUFLAGE 

UTILITY UNIFORMS. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF POLICY.—It is the policy of the United 

States that the Secretary of Defense shall eliminate the development and fielding of Armed Force-specific combat and camouflage 

utility uniforms and families of uniforms in order to adopt and 

field a common combat and camouflage utility uniform or family 

of uniforms for specific combat environments to be used by all 

members of the Armed Forces. 

(b) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided in subsection (c), after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of a military 

department may not adopt any new camouflage pattern design 

or uniform fabric for any combat or camouflage utility uniform 

or family of uniforms for use by an Armed Force, unless— 

(1) the new design or fabric is a combat or camouflage 

utility uniform or family of uniforms that will be adopted by 

all Armed Forces; 

(2) the Secretary adopts a uniform already in use by 

another Armed Force; or 

(3) the Secretary of Defense grants an exception based 

on unique circumstances or operational requirements. 

(c) EXCEPTIONS.—Nothing in subsection (b) shall be construed 

as— 

(1) prohibiting the development of combat and camouflage 

utility uniforms and families of uniforms for use by personnel 

assigned to or operating in support of the unified combatant 

command for special operations forces described in section 167 

of title 10, United States Code; 

(2) prohibiting engineering modifications to existing uniforms that improve the performance of combat and camouflage 

utility uniforms, including power harnessing or generating textiles, fire resistant fabrics, and anti-vector, anti-microbial, and 

anti-bacterial treatments; 

(3) prohibiting the Secretary of a military department from 

fielding ancillary uniform items, including headwear, footwear, 

body armor, and any other such items as determined by the 

Secretary; 

(4) prohibiting the Secretary of a military department from 

issuing vehicle crew uniforms; 

(5) prohibiting cosmetic service-specific uniform modifications to include insignia, pocket orientation, closure devices, 

inserts, and undergarments; or 

(6) prohibiting the continued fielding or use of pre-existing 

service-specific or operation-specific combat uniforms as long 

as the uniforms continue to meet operational requirements. 

(d) REGISTRATION REQUIRED.—The Secretary of a military 

department shall formally register with the Joint Clothing and 

Textiles Governance Board all uniforms in use by an Armed Force 
H. R. 3304—72 

under the jurisdiction of the Secretary and all such uniforms 

planned for use by such an Armed Force. 

(e) LIMITATION ON RESTRICTION.—The Secretary of a military 

department may not prevent the Secretary of another military 

department from authorizing the use of any combat or camouflage 

utility uniform or family of uniforms. 

(f) GUIDANCE REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

issue guidance to implement this section. 

(2) CONTENT.—At a minimum, the guidance required by 

paragraph (1) shall require the Secretary of each of the military 

departments— 

(A) in cooperation with the commanders of the combatant commands, including the unified combatant command 

for special operations forces, to establish, by not later than 

180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

joint criteria for combat and camouflage utility uniforms 

and families of uniforms, which shall be included in all 

new requirements documents for such uniforms; 

(B) to continually work together to assess and develop 

new technologies that could be incorporated into future 

combat and camouflage utility uniforms and families of 

uniforms to improve war fighter survivability; 

(C) to ensure that new combat and camouflage utility 

uniforms and families of uniforms meet the geographic 

and operational requirements of the commanders of the 

combatant commands; and 

(D) to ensure that all new combat and camouflage 

utility uniforms and families of uniforms achieve interoperability with all components of individual war fighter systems, including body armor, organizational clothing and 

individual equipment, and other individual protective systems. 

(g) REPEAL OF POLICY.—Section 352 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84, 123 

Stat. 2262; 10 U.S.C. 771 note) is repealed. 

TITLE IV—MILITARY PERSONNEL 

AUTHORIZATIONS 

Subtitle A—Active Forces 

Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces. 

Sec. 402. Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels and in 

annual limitation on certain end strength reductions. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Forces 

Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve. 

Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the reserves. 

Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status). 

Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians. 

Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty 

for operational support. 

Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 421. Military personnel. 
H. R. 3304—73 

Subtitle A—Active Forces 

SEC. 401. END STRENGTHS FOR ACTIVE FORCES. 

The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty 

personnel as of September 30, 2014, as follows: 

(1) The Army, 520,000. 

(2) The Navy, 323,600. 

(3) The Marine Corps, 190,200. 

(4) The Air Force, 327,600. 

SEC. 402. REVISIONS IN PERMANENT ACTIVE DUTY END STRENGTH 

MINIMUM LEVELS AND IN ANNUAL LIMITATION ON CERTAIN END STRENGTH REDUCTIONS. 

(a) PERMANENT ACTIVE DUTY END STRENGTH MINIMUM

LEVELS.—Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the following 

new paragraphs: 

‘‘(1) For the Army, 510,000. 

‘‘(2) For the Navy, 323,600. 

‘‘(3) For the Marine Corps, 188,000. 

‘‘(4) For the Air Force, 327,600.’’. 

(b) ANNUAL MAXIMUM AUTHORIZED REDUCTION IN END

STRENGTHS.— (1) ARMY END STRENGTHS.—Subsection (a) of section 403 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

(Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1708) is amended by striking 

‘‘15,000 members’’ and inserting ‘‘25,000 members’’. 

(2) MARINE CORPS END STRENGTHS.—Subsection (b) of such 

section is amended by striking ‘‘5,000 members’’ and inserting 

‘‘7,500 members’’. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Forces 

SEC. 411. END STRENGTHS FOR SELECTED RESERVE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Armed Forces are authorized strengths 

for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of 

September 30, 2014, as follows: 

(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 354,200. 

(2) The Army Reserve, 205,000. 

(3) The Navy Reserve, 59,100. 

(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 39,600. 

(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 105,400. 

(6) The Air Force Reserve, 70,400. 

(7) The Coast Guard Reserve, 9,000. 

(b) END STRENGTH REDUCTIONS.—The end strengths prescribed 

by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component 

shall be proportionately reduced by— 

(1) the total authorized strength of units organized to serve 

as units of the Selected Reserve of such component which 

are on active duty (other than for training) at the end of 

the fiscal year; and 

(2) the total number of individual members not in units 

organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such 

component who are on active duty (other than for training 
H. R. 3304—74 

or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their 

consent at the end of the fiscal year. 

(c) END STRENGTH INCREASES.—Whenever units or individual 

members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are 

released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength 

prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such 

reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total 

authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of 

such individual members. 

SEC. 412. END STRENGTHS FOR RESERVES ON ACTIVE DUTY IN SUPPORT OF THE RESERVES. 

Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the 

reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of 

September 30, 2014, the following number of Reserves to be serving 

on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members 

of the National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, 

recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components: 

(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 32,060. 

(2) The Army Reserve, 16,261. 

(3) The Navy Reserve, 10,159. 

(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,261. 

(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 14,734. 

(6) The Air Force Reserve, 2,911. 

SEC. 413. END STRENGTHS FOR MILITARY TECHNICIANS (DUAL 

STATUS). 

The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) 

as of the last day of fiscal year 2014 for the reserve components 

of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of 

title 10, United States Code) shall be the following: 

(1) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 

27,210. 

(2) For the Army Reserve, 8,395. 

(3) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 21,875. 

(4) For the Air Force Reserve, 10,429. 

SEC. 414. FISCAL YEAR 2014 LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF NON-DUAL 

STATUS TECHNICIANS. 

(a) LIMITATIONS.— (1) NATIONAL GUARD.—Within the limitation provided in 

section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the number 

of non-dual status technicians employed by the National Guard 

as of September 30, 2014, may not exceed the following: 

(A) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 

1,600. 

(B) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 

350. 

(2) ARMY RESERVE.—The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30, 2014, 

may not exceed 595. 

(3) AIR FORCE RESERVE.—The number of non-dual status 

technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September 

30, 2014, may not exceed 90. 

(b) NON-DUAL STATUS TECHNICIANS DEFINED.—In this section, 

the term ‘‘non-dual status technician’’ has the meaning given that 

term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States Code. 
H. R. 3304—75 

SEC. 415. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RESERVE PERSONNEL AUTHORIZED 

TO BE ON ACTIVE DUTY FOR OPERATIONAL SUPPORT. 

During fiscal year 2014, the maximum number of members 

of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving 

at any time on full-time operational support duty under section 

115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the following: 

(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000. 

(2) The Army Reserve, 13,000. 

(3) The Navy Reserve, 6,200. 

(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000. 

(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000. 

(6) The Air Force Reserve, 14,000. 

Subtitle C—Authorization of 

Appropriations 

SEC. 421. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 

authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use 

of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401. 

(b) CONSTRUCTION OF AUTHORIZATION.—The authorization of 

appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization 

of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal 

year 2014. 

TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL 

POLICY 

Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy Generally 

Sec. 501. Congressional notification requirements related to increases in number of 

general and flag officers on active duty or in joint duty assignments. 

Sec. 502. Service credit for cyberspace experience or advanced education upon original appointment as a commissioned officer. 

Sec. 503. Selective early retirement authority for regular officers and selective 

early removal of officers from reserve active-status list. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management 

Sec. 511. Suicide prevention efforts for members of the reserve components. 

Sec. 512. Removal of restrictions on the transfer of officers between the active and 

inactive National Guard. 

Sec. 513. Limitations on cancellations of deployment of certain reserve component 

units and involuntary mobilizations of certain Reserves. 

Sec. 514. Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve component general 

and flag officers in an active status. 

Sec. 515. Feasibility of establishing a unit of the National Guard in American 

Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 

Subtitle C—General Service Authorities 

Sec. 521. Provision of information under Transition Assistance Program about disability-related employment and education protections. 

Sec. 522. Medical examination requirements regarding post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury before administrative separation. 

Sec. 523. Establishment and use of consistent definition of gender-neutral occupational standard for military career designators. 

Sec. 524. Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service Implementation Plan. 

Sec. 525. Provision of military service records to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

in an electronic format. 
H. R. 3304—76 

Sec. 526. Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System. 

Subtitle D—Military Justice Matters, Other Than Sexual Assault Prevention and 

Response and Related Reforms 

Sec. 531. Modification of eligibility for appointment as Judge on the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 532. Enhancement of protection of rights of conscience of members of the 

Armed Forces and chaplains of such members. 

Sec. 533. Inspector General investigation of Armed Forces compliance with regulations for the protection of rights of conscience of members of the Armed 

Forces and their chaplains. 

Sec. 534. Survey of military chaplains views on Department of Defense policy regarding chaplain prayers outside of religious services. 

Subtitle E—Member Education and Training 

Sec. 541. Additional requirements for approval of educational programs for purposes of certain educational assistance under laws administered by the 

Secretary of Defense. 

Sec. 542. Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and training for military 

occupational specialties with skills and training required for civilian certifications and licenses. 

Sec. 543. Report on the Troops to Teachers program. 

Sec. 544. Secretary of Defense report on feasibility of requiring automatic operation 

of current prohibition on accrual of interest on direct student loans of 

certain members of the Armed Forces. 

Subtitle F—Defense Dependents’ Education and Military Family Readiness Matters 

Sec. 551. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit 

dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense 

civilian employees. 

Sec. 552. Impact aid for children with severe disabilities. 

Sec. 553. Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual elementary and secondary education component of Department of Defense education program. 

Sec. 554. Family support programs for immediate family members of members of 

the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces. 

Sec. 555. Sense of Congress on parental rights of members of the Armed Forces in 

child custody determinations. 

Subtitle G—Decorations and Awards 

Sec. 561. Repeal of limitation on number of medals of honor that may be awarded 

to the same member of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 562. Standardization of time-limits for recommending and awarding Medal of 

Honor, Distinguished-Service Cross, Navy Cross, Air Force Cross, and 

Distinguished-Service Medal. 

Sec. 563. Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard 

Medal of Honor Roll requirements. 

Sec. 564. Prompt replacement of military decorations. 

Sec. 565. Review of eligibility for, and award of, Purple Heart to victims of the attacks at recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, and at Fort Hood, 

Texas. 

Sec. 566. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to former members of the 

Armed Forces previously recommended for award of the Medal of Honor. 

Sec. 567. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor for acts of valor during 

the Vietnam War. 

Sec. 568. Authorization for award of the Distinguished-Service Cross for acts of 

valor during the Korean and Vietnam Wars. 

Sec. 569. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to First Lieutenant Alonzo 

H. Cushing for acts of valor during the Civil War. 

Subtitle H—Other Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports 

Sec. 571. Report on feasibility of expanding performance evaluation reports to include 360-degree assessment approach. 

Sec. 572. Report on Department of Defense personnel policies regarding members 

of the Armed Forces with HIV or Hepatitis B. 

Sec. 573. Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of secondary 

schools. 

Sec. 574. Comptroller General report on use of determination of personality disorder or adjustment disorder as basis to separate members from the 

Armed Forces. 
H. R. 3304—77 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

Sec. 581. Accounting for members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense 

civilian employees listed as missing and related reports. Sec. 582. Expansion of privileged information authorities to debriefing reports of 

certain recovered persons who were never placed in a missing status. Sec. 583. Revision of specified senior military colleges to reflect consolidation of 

North Georgia College and State University and Gainesville State College. Sec. 584. Review of security of military installations, including barracks, temporary 

lodging facilities, and multi-family residences. Sec. 585. Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army National Military 

Cemeteries. 

Sec. 586. Military salute during recitation of pledge of allegiance by members of the 

Armed Forces not in uniform and by veterans. Sec. 587. Improved climate assessments and dissemination of results. 

Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy 

Generally 

SEC. 501. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS RELATED 

TO INCREASES IN NUMBER OF GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICERS ON ACTIVE DUTY OR IN JOINT DUTY ASSIGNMENTS. 

(a) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION REQUIRED; BASELINES.—Section 526 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (d) through (h) as subsections (c) through (g), respectively; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subsections: 

‘‘(h) ACTIVE-DUTY BASELINE.— ‘‘(1) NOTICE AND WAIT REQUIREMENT.—If the Secretary of 

a military department proposes an action that would increase 

above the baseline the number of general officers or flag officers 

of an armed force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary 

who would be on active duty and would count against the 

statutory limit applicable to that armed force under subsection 

(a), the action shall not take effect until after the end of 

the 60-calendar day period beginning on the date on which 

the Secretary provides notice of the proposed action, including 

the rationale for the action, to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate. 

‘‘(2) BASELINE DEFINED.—For purposes of paragraph (1), 

the term ‘baseline’ for an armed force means the lower of— 

‘‘(A) the statutory limit of general officers or flag officers of that armed force under subsection (a); or 

‘‘(B) the actual number of general officers or flag officers of that armed force who, as of January 1, 2014, counted 

toward the statutory limit of general officers or flag officers 

of that armed force under subsection (a). 

‘‘(3) LIMITATION.—If, at any time, the actual number of 

general officers or flag officers of an armed force who count 

toward the statutory limit of general officers or flag officers 

of that armed force under subsection (a) exceeds such statutory 

limit, then no increase described in paragraph (1) for that 

armed force may occur until the general officer or flag officer 

total for that armed force is reduced below such statutory 

limit. 

‘‘(i) JOINT DUTY ASSIGNMENT BASELINE.— 

‘‘(1) NOTICE AND WAIT REQUIREMENT.—If the Secretary of 

Defense, the Secretary of a military department, or the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff proposes an action that would 
H. R. 3304—78 

increase above the baseline the number of general officers 

and flag officers of the armed forces in joint duty assignments 

who count against the statutory limit under subsection (b)(1), 

the action shall not take effect until after the end of the 

60-calendar day period beginning on the date on which the 

Secretary or Chairman, as the case may be, provides notice 

of the proposed action, including the rationale for the action, 

to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate. 

‘‘(2) BASELINE DEFINED.—For purposes of paragraph (1), 

the term ‘baseline’ means the lower of— 

‘‘(A) the statutory limit on general officer and flag 

officer positions that are joint duty assignments under 

subsection (b)(1); or 

‘‘(B) the actual number of general officers and flag 

officers who, as of January 1, 2014, were in joint duty 

assignments counted toward the statutory limit under subsection (b)(1). 

‘‘(3) LIMITATION.—If, at any time, the actual number of 

general officers and flag officers in joint duty assignments 

counted toward the statutory limit under subsection (b)(1) 

exceeds such statutory limit, then no increase described in 

paragraph (1) may occur until the number of general officers 

and flag officers in joint duty assignments is reduced below 

such statutory limit.’’. 

(b) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.— 

(1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than February 1, 2014, the 

Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a 

report specifying— 

(A) the numbers of general officers and flag officers 

who, as of January 1, 2014, counted toward the servicespecific limits of subsection (a) of section 526 of title 10, 

United States Code; and 

(B) the number of general officers and flag officers 

in joint duty assignments who, as of January 1, 2014, 

counted toward the statutory limit under subsection (b)(1) 

of such section. 

(2) ANNUAL REPORTS.—Section 526 of title 10, United States 

Code, is further amended by inserting after subsection (i), as 

added by subsection (a)(2) of this section, the following new 

subsection: 

‘‘(j) ANNUAL REPORT ON GENERAL OFFICER AND FLAG OFFICER

NUMBERS.—Not later than March 1, 2015, and each March 1 thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees 

on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate 

a report specifying— 

‘‘(1) the numbers of general officers and flag officers who, 

as of January 1 of the calendar year in which the report 

is submitted, counted toward the service-specific limits of subsection (a); and 

‘‘(2) the number of general officers and flag officers in 

joint duty assignments who, as of such January 1, counted 

toward the statutory limit under subsection (b)(1).’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this is section 

shall take effect on January 1, 2014. 
H. R. 3304—79 

SEC. 502. SERVICE CREDIT FOR CYBERSPACE EXPERIENCE OR 

ADVANCED EDUCATION UPON ORIGINAL APPOINTMENT AS 

A COMMISSIONED OFFICER. 

Section 533 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsections (a)(2) and (c), by inserting ‘‘or (g)’’ after 

‘‘subsection (b)’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(g)(1) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of 

Defense, if the Secretary of a military department determines that 

the number of commissioned officers with cyberspace-related experience or advanced education serving on active duty in an armed 

force under the jurisdiction of such Secretary is critically below 

the number needed, such Secretary may credit any person receiving 

an original appointment with a period of constructive service for 

the following: 

‘‘(A) Special experience or training in a particular cyberspace-related field if such experience or training is directly 

related to the operational needs of the armed force concerned. 

‘‘(B) Any period of advanced education in a cyberspacerelated field beyond the baccalaureate degree level if such 

advanced education is directly related to the operational needs 

of the armed force concerned. 

‘‘(2) Constructive service credited an officer under this subsection shall not exceed one year for each year of special experience, 

training, or advanced education, and not more than three years 

total constructive service may be credited. 

‘‘(3) Constructive service credited an officer under this subsection is in addition to any service credited that officer under 

subsection (a) and shall be credited at the time of the original 

appointment of the officer. 

‘‘(4) The authority to award constructive service credit under 

this subsection expires on December 31, 2018.’’. 

SEC. 503. SELECTIVE EARLY RETIREMENT AUTHORITY FOR REGULAR 

OFFICERS AND SELECTIVE EARLY REMOVAL OF OFFICERS 

FROM RESERVE ACTIVE-STATUS LIST. 

(a) REGULAR OFFICERS ON THE ACTIVE-DUTY LIST CONSIDERED

FOR SELECTIVE EARLY RETIREMENT.— 

(1) LIEUTENANT COLONELS AND COMMANDERS.—Subparagraph (A) of section 638a(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by striking ‘‘would be subject to’’ and all that 

follows through ‘‘two or more times)’’ and inserting ‘‘have failed 

of selection for promotion at least one time and whose names 

are not on a list of officers recommended for promotion’’. 

(2) COLONELS AND NAVY CAPTAINS.—Subparagraph (B) of 

such section is amended by striking ‘‘would be subject to’’ 

and all that follows through ‘‘not less than two years)’’ and 

inserting ‘‘have served on active duty in that grade for at 

least two years and whose names are not on a list of officers 

recommended for promotion’’. 

(b) OFFICERS CONSIDERED FOR SELECTIVE EARLY REMOVAL

FROM RESERVE ACTIVE-STATUS LIST.—Section 14704 of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘Whenever’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘all officers on that list’’ and inserting 

‘‘officers on the reserve active-status list’’; 
H. R. 3304—80 

(C) by striking ‘‘the reserve active-status list, in the 

number specified by the Secretary by each grade and 

competitive category.’’ and inserting ‘‘that list.’’; and 

(D) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(2) Except as provided in paragraph (3), the list of officers 

in a reserve component whose names are submitted to a board 

under paragraph (1) shall include each officer on the reserve activestatus list for that reserve component in the same grade and 

competitive category whose position on the reserve active-status 

list is between— 

‘‘(A) that of the most junior officer in that grade and 

competitive category whose name is submitted to the board; 

and 

‘‘(B) that of the most senior officer in that grade and 

competitive category whose name is submitted to the board. 

‘‘(3) A list submitted to a board under paragraph (1) may 

not include an officer who— 

‘‘(A) has been approved for voluntary retirement; or 

‘‘(B) is to be involuntarily retired under any provision of 

law during the fiscal year in which the board is convened 

or during the following fiscal year.’’; 

(2) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections 

(c) and (d), respectively; and 

(3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): 

‘‘(b) SPECIFICATION OF NUMBER OF OFFICERS WHO MAY BE

RECOMMENDED FOR SEPARATION.—The Secretary of the military 

department concerned shall specify the number of officers described 

in subsection (a)(1) that a board may recommend for separation 

under subsection (c).’’. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Component 

Management 

SEC. 511. SUICIDE PREVENTION EFFORTS FOR MEMBERS OF THE 

RESERVE COMPONENTS. 

(a) IMPROVED OUTREACH UNDER SUICIDE PREVENTION AND

RESILIENCE PROGRAM.—Section 10219 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): 

‘‘(f) OUTREACH FOR CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE RESERVE COMPO- NENTS.—(1) Upon the request of an adjutant general of a State, 

the Secretary may share with the adjutant general the contact 

information of members described in paragraph (2) who reside 

in such State in order for the adjutant general to include such 

members in suicide prevention efforts conducted under this section. 

‘‘(2) Members described in this paragraph are— 

‘‘(A) members of the Individual Ready Reserve; and 

‘‘(B) members of a reserve component who are individual 

mobilization augmentees.’’. 

(b) INCLUSION IN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE COMMUNITY PART- NERSHIPS PILOT PROGRAM.—Section 706 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 

Stat. 1800; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended— 
H. R. 3304—81 

(1) in subsections (a) and (e), by striking ‘‘and substance 

use disorders and traumatic brain injury’’ and inserting ‘‘, substance use disorders, traumatic brain injury, and suicide 

prevention’’; and 

(2) in subsection (c)(3), by striking ‘‘and substance use 

disorders and traumatic brain injury described in paragraph 

(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘, substance use disorders, traumatic brain 

injury, and suicide prevention’’. 

SEC. 512. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIONS ON THE TRANSFER OF OFFICERS BETWEEN THE ACTIVE AND INACTIVE NATIONAL 

GUARD. 

(a) ARMY NATIONAL GUARD.—During the period ending on 

December 31, 2016, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary 

of the Army: 

(1) An officer of the Army National Guard who fills a 

vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the Army National 

Guard may be transferred from the active Army National Guard 

to the inactive Army National Guard. 

(2) An officer of the Army National Guard transferred 

to the inactive Army National Guard pursuant to paragraph 

(1) may be transferred from the inactive Army National Guard 

to the active Army National Guard to fill a vacancy in a 

federally recognized unit. 

(b) AIR NATIONAL GUARD.—During the period ending on 

December 31, 2016, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary 

of the Air Force: 

(1) An officer of the Air National Guard who fills a vacancy 

in a federally recognized unit of the Air National Guard may 

be transferred from the active Air National Guard to the inactive Air National Guard. 

(2) An officer of the Air National Guard transferred to 

the inactive Air National Guard pursuant to paragraph (1) 

may be transferred from the inactive Air National Guard to 

the active Air National Guard to fill a vacancy in a federally 

recognized unit. 

SEC. 513. LIMITATIONS ON CANCELLATIONS OF DEPLOYMENT OF CERTAIN RESERVE COMPONENT UNITS AND INVOLUNTARY 

MOBILIZATIONS OF CERTAIN RESERVES. 

(a) LIMITATION ON CANCELLATION OF DEPLOYMENT OF CERTAIN

UNITS WITHIN 180 DAYS OF SCHEDULED DEPLOYMENT.— (1) LIMITATION.—The deployment of a unit of a reserve 

component of the Armed Forces described in paragraph (2) 

may not be cancelled during the 180-day period ending on 

the date on which the unit is otherwise scheduled for deployment without the approval, in writing, of the Secretary of 

Defense. 

(2) COVERED DEPLOYMENTS.—A deployment of a unit of 

a reserve component described in this paragraph is a deployment whose cancellation as described in paragraph (1) is due 

to the deployment of a unit of a regular component of the 

Armed Forces to carry out the mission for which the unit 

of the reserve component was otherwise to be deployed. 

(3) NOTICE TO CONGRESS AND GOVERNORS ON APPROVAL

OF CANCELLATION OF DEPLOYMENT.—On approving the cancellation of deployment of a unit under paragraph (1), the Secretary 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the 
H. R. 3304—82 

Governor concerned a notice on the approval of cancellation 

of deployment of the unit. 

(b) ADVANCE NOTICE TO CERTAIN RESERVES ON INVOLUNTARY

MOBILIZATION.— 

(1) ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIRED.—The Secretary concerned 

may not provide less than 120 days advance notice of an involuntary mobilization to a member of the reserve component 

of the Armed Forces described in paragraph (2) without the 

approval, in writing, of the Secretary of Defense. 

(2) COVERED RESERVES.—A member of a reserve component 

described in this paragraph is a member as follows: 

(A) A member who is not assigned to a unit organized 

to serve as a unit. 

(B) A member who is to be mobilized apart from the 

member’s unit. 

(3) COMMENCEMENT OF APPLICABILITY.—This subsection 

shall apply with respect to members who are mobilized on 

or after the date that is 120 days after the date of the enactment 

of this Act. 

(4) SECRETARY CONCERNED DEFINED.—In this subsection, 

the term ‘‘Secretary concerned’’ has the meaning given that 

term in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code. 

(5) SUNSET.—This subsection shall cease to apply as of 

the date of the completion of the withdrawal of United States 

combat forces from Afghanistan. 

(c) NONDELEGATION OF APPROVAL.—The Secretary of Defense 

may not delegate the approval of cancellations of deployments of 

units under subsection (a) or the approval of mobilization of 

Reserves without advance notice under subsection (b). 

SEC. 514. REVIEW OF REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORIZATIONS FOR 

RESERVE COMPONENT GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICERS IN 

AN ACTIVE STATUS. 

(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct 

a review of the general officer and flag officer requirements for 

members of the reserve component in an active status. 

(b) PURPOSE OF REVIEW.—The purpose of the review is to 

ensure that the authorized strengths provided in section 12004 

of title 10, United States Code, for reserve general officers and 

reserve flag officers in an active status— 

(1) are based on an objective requirements process and 

are sufficient for the effective management, leadership, and 

administration of the reserve components; 

(2) provide a qualified, sufficient pool from which reserve 

component general and flag officers can continue to be assigned 

on active duty in joint duty and in-service military positions; 

(3) reflect a review of the appropriateness and number 

of exemptions provided by subsections (b), (c), and (d) of section 

12004 of title 10, United States Code; 

(4) reflect the efficiencies that can be achieved through 

downgrading or elimination of reserve component general or 

flag officer positions, including through the conversion of certain 

reserve component general or flag officer positions to senior 

civilian positions; and 

(5) are subjected to periodic review, control, and adjustment. 
H. R. 3304—83 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 

of Representatives a report containing the results of the review, 

including such recommendations for changes in law and policy 

related to authorized reserve general and flag officers strengths 

as the Secretary considers to be appropriate. 

SEC. 515. FEASIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A UNIT OF THE NATIONAL 

GUARD IN AMERICAN SAMOA AND IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS. 

(a) DETERMINATION REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

determine the feasibility of establishing— 

(1) a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa; 

and 

(2) a unit of the National Guard in the Commonwealth 

of the Northern Mariana Islands. 

(b) FORCE STRUCTURE ELEMENTS.—In making the feasibility 

determination under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall 

consider the following: 

(1) The allocation of National Guard force structure and 

manpower to American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the 

Northern Mariana Islands in the event of the establishment 

of a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and in 

the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the 

impact of this allocation on existing National Guard units in 

the 50 States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin 

Islands, Guam, and the District of Columbia. 

(2) The Federal funding that would be required to support 

pay, benefits, training operations, and missions of members 

of a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the 

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, based on 

the allocation derived from paragraph (1), and the equipment, 

including maintenance, required to support such force structure. 

(3) The presence of existing infrastructure to support a 

unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the 

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the 

requirement for additional infrastructure, including information 

technology infrastructure, to support such force structure, based 

on the allocation derived from paragraph (1). 

(4) How a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa 

and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Island would 

accommodate the National Guard Bureau’s ‘‘Essential Ten’’ 

homeland defense capabilities (i.e., aviation, engineering, civil 

support teams, security, medical, transportation, maintenance, 

logistics, joint force headquarters, and communications) and 

reflect regional needs. 

(5) The manpower cadre, both military personnel and fulltime support, including National Guard technicians, required 

to establish, maintain, and sustain a unit of the National 

Guard in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the 

Northern Mariana Islands, and the ability of American Samoa 

and of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands 

to support demographically a unit of the National Guard at 

each location. 
H. R. 3304—84 

(6) The ability of a unit of the National Guard in American 

Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 

Islands to maintain unit readiness and the logistical challenges 

associated with transportation, communications, supply/ 

resupply, and training operations and missions. 

(c) SUBMISSION OF CONCLUSION.—Not later than 180 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

shall notify the congressional defense committees of the results 

of the feasibility determination made under subsection (a). If the 

Secretary determines that establishment of a unit of the National 

Guard in American Samoa or the Commonwealth of the Northern 

Mariana Islands (or both) is feasible, the Secretary shall include 

in the notification the following: 

(1) A determination of whether the executive branch of 

American Samoa and of the Commonwealth of the Northern 

Mariana Islands has enacted and implemented statutory 

authorization for an organized militia as a prerequisite for 

establishing a unit of the National Guard, and a description 

of any other steps that such executive branches must take 

to request and carry out the establishment of a National Guard 

unit. 

(2) A list of any amendments to titles 10, 32, and 37, 

United States Code, that would have to be enacted by Congress 

to provide for the establishment of a unit of the National 

Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the 

Northern Mariana Islands. 

(3) A description of any required Department of Defense 

actions to establish a unit of the National Guard in American 

Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 

Islands. 

(4) A suggested timeline for completion of the steps and 

actions described in the preceding paragraphs. 

Subtitle C—General Service Authorities 

SEC. 521. PROVISION OF INFORMATION UNDER TRANSITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ABOUT DISABILITY-RELATED EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATION PROTECTIONS. 

(a) ADDITIONAL ELEMENT OF PROGRAM.—Section 1144(b) of title 

10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

following new paragraph: 

‘‘(9) Provide information about disability-related employment and education protections.’’. 

(b) DEADLINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION.—The program carried out 

under section 1144 of title 10, United States Code, shall comply 

with the requirements of subsection (b)(9) of such section, as added 

by subsection (a), by not later than April 1, 2015. 

SEC. 522. MEDICAL EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS REGARDING POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER OR TRAUMATIC BRAIN 

INJURY BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION. 

Section 1177(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by inserting after ‘‘honorable’’ the following: ‘‘, including an administrative separation in lieu of court-martial,’’. 
H. R. 3304—85 

SEC. 523. ESTABLISHMENT AND USE OF CONSISTENT DEFINITION OF 

GENDER-NEUTRAL OCCUPATIONAL STANDARD FOR MILITARY CAREER DESIGNATORS. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF DEFINITIONS.—Section 543 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public 

Law 103–160; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by adding at the 

end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) GENDER-NEUTRAL OCCUPATIONAL STANDARD.—The term 

‘gender-neutral occupational standard’, with respect to a military career designator, means that all members of the Armed 

Forces serving in or assigned to the military career designator 

must meet the same performance outcome-based standards for 

the successful accomplishment of the necessary and required 

specific tasks associated with the qualifications and duties performed while serving in or assigned to the military career 

designator. 

‘‘(2) MILITARY CAREER DESIGNATOR.—The term ‘military 

career designator’ refers to— 

‘‘(A) in the case of enlisted members and warrant officers of the Armed Forces, military occupational specialties, 

specialty codes, enlisted designators, enlisted classification 

codes, additional skill identifiers, and special qualification 

identifiers; and 

‘‘(B) in the case of commissioned officers (other than 

commissioned warrant officers), officer areas of concentration, occupational specialties, specialty codes, additional 

skill identifiers, and special qualification identifiers.’’. 

(b) USE OF DEFINITIONS.—Such section is further amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 

‘‘military occupational career field’’ and inserting ‘‘military 

career designator’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘common, relevant 

performance standards’’ and inserting ‘‘an occupational 

standard’’; 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) in paragraph (1)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘any military occupational specialty’’ 

and inserting ‘‘any military career designator’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘requirements for members in that 

specialty and shall ensure (in the case of an occupational specialty’’ and inserting ‘‘requirements as part 

of the gender-neutral occupational standard for members in that career designator and shall ensure (in 

the case of a career designator’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘an occupational specialty’’ and 

inserting ‘‘a military career designator’’; 

(ii) by striking ‘‘that occupational specialty’’ and 

inserting ‘‘that military career designator’’; and 

(iii) by striking ‘‘that specialty’’ and inserting ‘‘that 

military career designator’’; and 

(3) in subsection (c)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘the occupational standards for a military occupational field’’ and inserting ‘‘the gender-neutral 
H. R. 3304—86 

occupational standard for a military career designator’’; 

and 

(B) by striking ‘‘that occupational field’’ and inserting 

‘‘that military career designator’’. 

SEC. 524. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE WOMEN IN SERVICE 

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. 

It is the sense of Congress that the Secretaries of the military 

departments— 

(1) no later than September 2015, should develop, review, 

and validate individual occupational standards, using validated 

gender-neutral occupational standards, so as to assess and 

assign members of the Armed Forces to units, including Special 

Operations Forces; and 

(2) no later than January 1, 2016, should complete all 

assessments. 

SEC. 525. PROVISION OF MILITARY SERVICE RECORDS TO THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS IN AN ELECTRONIC FORMAT. 

(a) PROVISION IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT.—In accordance with 

subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall make the covered records of 

each member of the Armed Forces available to the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs in an electronic format. 

(b) DEADLINE FOR PROVISION OF RECORDS.—With respect to 

a member of the Armed Forces who is discharged or released 

from the Armed Forces on or after January 1, 2014, the Secretary 

of Defense shall ensure that the covered records of the member 

are made available to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs not later 

than 90 days after the date of the member’s discharge or release. 

(c) SHARING OF PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION.—For purposes of the regulations promulgated under section 264(c) of the 

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public 

Law 104–191; 42 U.S.C. 1320d–2 note), making medical records 

available to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under subsection 

(a) shall be treated as a permitted disclosure. 

(d) RECORDS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE TO SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in consultation 

with the Secretary of Defense, shall ensure that the covered records 

of members of the Armed Forces that are available to the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs as of the date of the enactment of this Act 

are made electronically accessible and available as soon as practicable after that date to the Veterans Benefits Administration. 

(e) COVERED RECORDS DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘covered records’’ means, with respect to a member of the Armed 

Forces— 

(1) service treatment records; 

(2) accompanying personal records; 

(3) relevant unit records; and 

(4) medical records created by reason of treatment or services received pursuant to chapter 55 of title 10, United States 

Code. 

SEC. 526. REVIEW OF INTEGRATED DISABILITY EVALUATION SYSTEM. 

(a) REVIEW.—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with 

the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall conduct a review of— 
H. R. 3304—87 

(1) the backlog of pending cases in the Integrated Disability 

Evaluation System with respect to members of the reserve 

components of the Armed Forces for the purpose of addressing 

the matters specified in paragraph (1) of subsection (b); and 

(2) the improvements to the Integrated Disability Evaluation System specified in paragraph (2) of such subsection. 

(b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans’ Affairs of the 

House of Representatives and the Senate a report on the review 

conducted under subsection (a). Such report shall include the following: 

(1) With respect to the reserve components of the Armed 

Forces— 

(A) the number of pending cases that exist as of the 

date of the report, listed by military department, component, and, with respect to the National Guard, State; 

(B) as of the date of the report, the average time 

it takes the Department of Defense and the Department 

of Veterans Affairs to process a case through each phase 

or step of the Integrated Disability Evaluation System 

under that Department’s control; 

(C) a description of the measures the Secretary has 

taken, and will take, to resolve the backlog of cases in 

the Integrated Disability Evaluation System; and 

(D) the date by which the Secretary plans to resolve 

such backlog for each military department. 

(2) With respect to the regular components and reserve 

components of the Armed Forces— 

(A) a description of the progress being made by both 

the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans 

Affairs to transition the Integrated Disability Evaluation 

System to an integrated and readily accessible electronic 

format that a member of the Armed Forces may access 

to see the status of the member during each phase or 

step of the system; 

(B) an estimate of the cost to complete the transition 

to an integrated and readily accessible electronic format; 

and 

(C) an assessment of the feasibility of improving intransit visibility of pending cases, including by establishing 

a method of tracking a pending case when— 

(i) a military treatment facility is assigned a packet 

and pending case for action regarding a member; and 

(ii) a packet is at the Veterans Tracking Application and Disability Rating Activity Site of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

(c) PENDING CASE DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘pending 

case’’ means a case involving a member of the Armed Forces who, 

as of the date of the review under subsection (a), is within the 

Integrated Disability Evaluation System and has been referred 

to a medical evaluation board. 
H. R. 3304—88 

Subtitle D—Military Justice Matters, Other 

Than Sexual Assault Prevention and Response and Related Reforms 

SEC. 531. MODIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR APPOINTMENT AS 

JUDGE ON THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) MODIFICATION.—Paragraph (4) of section 942(b) of title 10, 

United States Code (article 142(b) of the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice), is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(4) A person may not be appointed as a judge of the court 

within seven years after retirement from active duty as a commissioned officer of a regular component of an armed force.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 

shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and 

shall apply with respect to appointments to the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces that occur on or after 

that date. 

SEC. 532. ENHANCEMENT OF PROTECTION OF RIGHTS OF CONSCIENCE 

OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND CHAPLAINS 

OF SUCH MEMBERS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a)(1) of section 533 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public 

Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1727; 10 U.S.C. prec. 1030 note) is 

amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘The Armed Forces shall accommodate the 

beliefs’’ and inserting ‘‘Unless it could have an adverse impact 

on military readiness, unit cohesion, and good order and discipline, the Armed Forces shall accommodate individual expressions of belief’’; 

(2) by inserting ‘‘sincerely held’’ before ‘‘conscience’’; and 

(3) by striking ‘‘use such beliefs’’ and inserting ‘‘use such 

expression of belief’’. 

(b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 90 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe 

the implementing regulations required by subsection (c) of such 

section. In prescribing such regulations, the Secretary shall consult 

with the official military faith-group representatives who endorse 

military chaplains. 

SEC. 533. INSPECTOR GENERAL INVESTIGATION OF ARMED FORCES 

COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS FOR THE PROTECTION 

OF RIGHTS OF CONSCIENCE OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

FORCES AND THEIR CHAPLAINS. 

(a) INVESTIGATION INTO COMPLIANCE; REPORT.—Not later than 

18 months after the date on which regulations are issued implementing the protections afforded by section 533 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112– 

239; 126 Stat. 1727; 10 U.S.C. prec. 1030 note), as amended by 

section 532, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report— 

(1) setting forth the results of an investigation by the 

Inspector General during that 18-month period into the compliance by the Armed Forces with the elements of such regulations 
H. R. 3304—89 

on adverse personnel actions, discrimination, or denials of promotion, schooling, training, or assignment for members of the 

Armed Forces based on conscience, moral principles, or religious 

beliefs; and 

(2) identifying the number of times during the investigation 

period that the Inspector General of the Department of Defense 

or the Inspector General of a military department was contacted 

regarding an incident involving the conscience, moral principles, 

or religious beliefs of a member of the Armed Forces. 

(b) CONSULTATION.—In conducting any analysis, investigation, 

or survey for purposes of this section, the Inspector General of 

the Department of Defense shall consult with the Armed Forces 

Chaplains Board, as appropriate. 

SEC. 534. SURVEY OF MILITARY CHAPLAINS VIEWS ON DEPARTMENT 

OF DEFENSE POLICY REGARDING CHAPLAIN PRAYERS 

OUTSIDE OF RELIGIOUS SERVICES. 

(a) SURVEY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct 

a survey among a statistically valid sample of military chaplains 

of the regular and reserve components of the Armed Forces, to 

be selected at random, to assess whether— 

(1) restrictions placed on prayers offered in a public or 

non-religious setting have prevented military chaplains from 

exercising the tenets of their faith as prescribed by their 

endorsing faith group; and 

(2) those restrictions have had an adverse impact on the 

ability of military chaplains to fulfill their duties to minister 

to members of the Armed Forces and their dependents. 

(b) DEADLINE FOR COMPLETION.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

complete the survey required by subsection (a) within one year 

after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(c) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—Not later than 90 days after 

completing the survey required by subsection (a), the Secretary 

of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services 

of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing— 

(1) the survey questionnaire; and 

(2) the results of the survey. 

Subtitle E—Member Education and 

Training 

SEC. 541. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVAL OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS FOR PURPOSES OF CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE UNDER LAWS ADMINISTERED BY 

THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 101 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by inserting after section 2006 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 2006a. Assistance for education and training: availability 

of certain assistance for use only for certain programs of education 

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Effective as of August, 1, 2014, an individual 

eligible for assistance under a Department of Defense educational 

assistance program or authority covered by this section may, except 
H. R. 3304—90 

as provided in subsection (b), only use such assistance for educational expenses incurred for a program as follows: 

‘‘(1) An eligible program (as defined in section 481 of the 

Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088)) that is offered 

by an institution of higher education that has entered into, 

and is complying with, a program participation agreement 

under section 487 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1094). 

‘‘(2) In the case of a program designed to prepare individuals for licensure or certification in any State, if the program 

meets the instructional curriculum licensure or certification 

requirements of such State. 

‘‘(3) In the case of a program designed to prepare individuals for employment pursuant to standards developed by a 

State board or agency in an occupation that requires approval 

or licensure for such employment, if the program is approved 

or licensed by such State board or agency. 

‘‘(b) WAIVER.—The Secretary of Defense may, by regulation, 

authorize the use of educational assistance under a Department 

of Defense educational assistance program or authority covered 

by this chapter for educational expenses incurred for a program 

of education that is not described in subsection (a) if the program— 

‘‘(1) is accredited and approved by a nationally or regionally 

recognized accrediting agency or association recognized by the 

Department of Education; 

‘‘(2) was not an eligible program described in subsection 

(a) at any time during the most recent two-year period; 

‘‘(3) is a program that the Secretary determines would 

further the purposes of the educational assistance programs 

or authorities covered by this chapter, or would further the 

education interests of students eligible for assistance under 

the such programs or authorities; and 

‘‘(4) the institution providing the program does not provide 

any commission, bonus, or other incentive payment based 

directly or indirectly on success in securing enrollments or 

financial aid to any persons or entities engaged in any student 

recruiting or admission activities or in making decisions 

regarding the award of student financial assistance, except 

for the recruitment of foreign students residing in foreign countries who are not eligible to receive Federal student assistance. 

‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘Department of Defense educational assistance programs and authorities covered by this section’ means 

the programs and authorities as follows: 

‘‘(A) The programs to assist military spouses in 

achieving education and training to expand employment 

and portable career opportunities under section 1784a of 

this title. 

‘‘(B) The authority to pay tuition for off-duty training 

or education of members of the armed forces under section 

2007 of this title. 

‘‘(C) The program of educational assistance for members of the Selected Reserve under chapter 1606 of this 

title. 

‘‘(D) The program of educational assistance for reserve 

component members supporting contingency operations and 

certain other operations under chapter 1607 of this title. 
H. R. 3304—91 

‘‘(E) Any other program or authority of the Department 

of Defense for assistance in education or training carried 

out under the laws administered by the Secretary of 

Defense that is designated by the Secretary, by regulation, 

for purposes of this section. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘institution of higher education’ has the 

meaning given that term in section 102 of the Higher Education 

Act for 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002).’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 101 of such title is amended by inserting after 

the item relating to section 2006 the following new item: 

‘‘2006a. Assistance for education and training: availability of certain assistance for 

use only for certain programs of education.’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

shall take effect on August 1, 2014. 

SEC. 542. ENHANCEMENT OF MECHANISMS TO CORRELATE SKILLS 

AND TRAINING FOR MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES WITH SKILLS AND TRAINING REQUIRED FOR 

CIVILIAN CERTIFICATIONS AND LICENSES. 

(a) IMPROVEMENT OF INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS

OF THE ARMED FORCES ABOUT CORRELATION.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretaries of the military departments, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense 

for Personnel and Readiness, shall, to the maximum extent 

practicable, make information on civilian credentialing 

opportunities available to members of the Armed Forces beginning with, and at every stage of, training of members for 

military occupational specialties, in order to permit members— 

(A) to evaluate the extent to which such training correlates with the skills and training required in connection 

with various civilian certifications and licenses; and 

(B) to assess the suitability of such training for 

obtaining or pursuing such civilian certifications and 

licenses. 

(2) COORDINATION WITH TRANSITION GOALS PLANS SUCCESS

PROGRAM.—Information shall be made available under paragraph (1) in a manner consistent with the Transition Goals 

Plans Success (GPS) program. 

(3) TYPES OF INFORMATION.—The information made available under paragraph (1) shall include, but not be limited 

to, the following: 

(A) Information on the civilian occupational equivalents 

of military occupational specialties (MOS). 

(B) Information on civilian license or certification 

requirements, including examination requirements. 

(C) Information on the availability and opportunities 

for use of educational benefits available to members of 

the Armed Forces, as appropriate, corresponding training, 

or continuing education that leads to a certification exam 

in order to provide a pathway to credentialing opportunities. 

(4) USE AND ADAPTATION OF CERTAIN PROGRAMS.—In 

making information available under paragraph (1), the Secretaries of the military departments may use and adapt appropriate portions of the Credentialing Opportunities On-Line 

(COOL) programs of the Army and the Navy and the 
H. R. 3304—92 

Credentialing and Educational Research Tool (CERT) of the 

Air Force. 

(b) IMPROVEMENT OF ACCESS OF ACCREDITED CIVILIAN

CREDENTIALING AND RELATED ENTITIES TO MILITARY TRAINING CONTENT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretaries of the military departments, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense 

for Personnel and Readiness, shall, to the maximum extent 

practicable consistent with national security and privacy 

requirements, make available to entities specified in paragraph 

(2), upon request of such entities, information such as military 

course training curricula, syllabi, and materials, levels of military advancement attained, and professional skills developed. 

(2) ENTITIES.—The entities specified in this paragraph are 

the following: 

(A) Civilian credentialing agencies. 

(B) Entities approved by the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs, or by State approving agencies, for purposes of 

the use of educational assistance benefits under the laws 

administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

(3) CENTRAL REPOSITORY.—The actions taken pursuant to 

paragraph (1) may include the establishment of a central repository of information on training and training materials provided 

members in connection with military occupational specialities 

that is readily accessible by entities specified in paragraph 

(2) in order to meet requests described in paragraph (1). 

SEC. 543. REPORT ON THE TROOPS TO TEACHERS PROGRAM. 

Not later than March 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

the House of Representatives a report on the Troops to Teachers 

program that includes each of the following: 

(1) An evaluation of whether there is a need to broaden 

eligibility to allow service members and veterans without a 

bachelor’s degree admission into the program and whether the 

program can be strengthened. 

(2) An evaluation of whether a pilot program should be 

established to demonstrate the potential benefit of an institutional-based award for troops to teachers, as long as any such 

pilot program maximizes benefits to service members and minimizes administrative and other overhead costs at the participating academic institutions. 

SEC. 544. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE REPORT ON FEASIBILITY OF 

REQUIRING AUTOMATIC OPERATION OF CURRENT 

PROHIBITION ON ACCRUAL OF INTEREST ON DIRECT STUDENT LOANS OF CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

FORCES. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 

this Act, the Secretary of Defense, after consultation with relevant 

Federal agencies, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services 

of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report 

addressing— 

(1) the feasibility of automatic application of the benefits 

provided under section 455(o) of the Higher Education Act 

of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(o)) for members of the Armed Forces 

eligible for the benefits; and 
H. R. 3304—93 

(2) if the Secretary determines automatic application of 

such benefits is feasible, how the Department of Defense would 

implement the automatic operation of the current prohibition 

on the accrual of interest on direct student loans of certain 

members, including the Federal agencies with which the 

Department of Defense would coordinate. 

Subtitle F—Defense Dependents’ Education and Military Family Readiness 

Matters 

SEC. 551. CONTINUATION OF AUTHORITY TO ASSIST LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES THAT BENEFIT DEPENDENTS OF 

MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES. 

(a) ASSISTANCE TO SCHOOLS WITH SIGNIFICANT NUMBERS OF

MILITARY DEPENDENT STUDENTS.—Of the amount authorized to 

be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section 301 and available 

for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $25,000,000 shall be 

available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109– 

163; 20 U.S.C. 7703b). 

(b) LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY DEFINED.—In this section, 

the term ‘‘local educational agency’’ has the meaning given that 

term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education 

Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)). 

SEC. 552. IMPACT AID FOR CHILDREN WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES. 

Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 pursuant to section 301 and available for operation and 

maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding 

table in section 4301, $5,000,000 shall be available for payments 

under section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by 

Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–77; 20 U.S.C. 7703a). 

SEC. 553. TREATMENT OF TUITION PAYMENTS RECEIVED FOR VIRTUAL 

ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION COMPONENT 

OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM. 

(a) CREDITING OF PAYMENTS.—Section 2164(l) of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

paragraph: 

‘‘(3) Any payments received by the Secretary of Defense under 

this subsection shall be credited to the account designated by the 

Secretary for the operation of the virtual educational program under 

this subsection. Payments so credited shall be merged with other 

funds in the account and shall be available, to the extent provided 

in advance in appropriation Acts, for the same purposes and the 

same period as other funds in the account.’’. 

(b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amendment made by 

subsection (a) shall apply only with respect to tuition payments 

received under section 2164(l) of title 10, United States Code, for 
H. R. 3304—94 

enrollments authorized by such section, after the date of the enactment of this Act, in the virtual elementary and secondary education 

program of the Department of Defense education program. 

SEC. 554. FAMILY SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES ASSIGNED 

TO SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES. 

(a) PILOT PROGRAMS AUTHORIZED.—Consistent with such regulations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe to carry out 

this section, the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command may conduct up to three pilot programs to assess 

the feasibility and benefits of providing family support activities 

for the immediate family members of members of the Armed Forces 

assigned to special operations forces. In selecting and conducting 

any pilot program under this subsection, the Commander shall 

coordinate with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 

Readiness. 

(b) SELECTION OF PROGRAMS.—In selecting the pilot programs 

to be conducted under subsection (a), the Commander shall— 

(1) identify family support activities that have a direct 

and concrete impact on the readiness of special operations 

forces, but that are not being provided by the Secretary of 

a military department to the immediate family members of 

members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations 

forces; and 

(2) conduct a cost-benefit analysis of each family support 

activity proposed to be included in a pilot program. 

(c) EVALUATION.—The Commander shall develop outcome 

measurements to evaluate the success of each family support 

activity included in a pilot program under subsection (a). 

(d) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY.—The Commander may expend up to $5,000,000 during each fiscal year specified in subsection (f) 

to carry out the pilot programs under subsection (a). 

(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘Commander’’ means the Commander of the 

United States Special Operations Command. 

(2) The term ‘‘immediate family members’’ has the meaning 

given that term in section 1789(c) of title 10, United States 

Code. 

(3) The term ‘‘special operations forces’’ means those forces 

of the Armed Forces identified as special operations forces 

under section 167(i) of such title. 

(f) DURATION OF PILOT PROGRAM AUTHORITY.—The authority 

provided by subsection (a) is available to the Commander during 

fiscal years 2014 through 2016. 

(g) REPORT REQUIRED.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after completing 

a pilot program under subsection (a), the Commander shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a report 

describing the results of the pilot program. The Commander 

shall prepare the report in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. 

(2) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—The report shall include the 

following: 

(A) A description of the pilot program to address family 

support requirements not being provided by the Secretary 

of a military department to immediate family members 
H. R. 3304—95 

of members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces. 

(B) An assessment of the impact of the pilot program 

on the readiness of members of the Armed Forces assigned 

to special operations forces. 

(C) A comparison of the pilot program to other programs conducted by the Secretaries of the military departments to provide family support to immediate family members of members of the Armed Forces. 

(D) Recommendations for incorporating the lessons 

learned from the pilot program into family support programs conducted by the Secretaries of the military departments. 

(E) Any other matters considered appropriate by the 

Commander or the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. 

SEC. 555. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PARENTAL RIGHTS OF MEMBERS 

OF THE ARMED FORCES IN CHILD CUSTODY DETERMINATIONS. 

It is the sense of Congress that State courts should not consider 

a military deployment, including past, present, or future deployment, as the sole factor in determining child custody in a State 

court proceeding involving a parent who is a member of the Armed 

Forces. The best interest of the child should always prevail in 

custody cases, but members of the Armed Forces should not lose 

custody of their children based solely upon service in the Armed 

Forces in defense of the United States. 

Subtitle G—Decorations and Awards 

SEC. 561. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF MEDALS OF HONOR 

THAT MAY BE AWARDED TO THE SAME MEMBER OF THE 

ARMED FORCES. 

(a) ARMY.—Section 3744(a) of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by striking ‘‘medal of honor, distinguished-service cross,’’ 

and inserting ‘‘distinguished-service cross’’. 

(b) NAVY AND MARINE CORPS.—Section 6247 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘medal of honor,’’. 

(c) AIR FORCE.—Section 8744(a) of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by striking ‘‘medal of honor, Air Force cross,’’ and 

inserting ‘‘Air Force Cross’’. 

SEC. 562. STANDARDIZATION OF TIME-LIMITS FOR RECOMMENDING 

AND AWARDING MEDAL OF HONOR, DISTINGUISHEDSERVICE CROSS, NAVY CROSS, AIR FORCE CROSS, AND 

DISTINGUISHED-SERVICE MEDAL. 

(a) ARMY.—Section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended— 

(1) in subsection (b)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘three years’’ and 

inserting ‘‘five years’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘two years’’ and 

inserting ‘‘three years’’; and 

(2) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ‘‘two years’’ and 

inserting ‘‘three years’’. 

(b) AIR FORCE.—Section 8744 of such title is amended— 
H. R. 3304—96 

(1) in subsection (b)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘three years’’ and 

inserting ‘‘five years’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘two years’’ and 

inserting ‘‘three years’’; and 

(2) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ‘‘two years’’ and 

inserting ‘‘three years’’. 

SEC. 563. RECODIFICATION AND REVISION OF ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, 

AND COAST GUARD MEDAL OF HONOR ROLL REQUIREMENTS. 

(a) AUTOMATIC ENROLLMENT AND FURNISHING OF CERTIFI- CATE.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 57 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended by inserting after section 1134 the following 

new section: 

‘‘§ 1134a. Medal of honor: Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast 

Guard Medal of Honor Roll 

‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There shall be in the Department of 

the Army, the Department of the Navy, the Department of the 

Air Force, and the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating a roll designated as the ‘Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast 

Guard Medal of Honor Roll’. 

‘‘(b) ENROLLMENT.—The Secretary concerned shall enter and 

record on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal 

of Honor Roll the name of each person who has served on active 

duty in the armed forces and who has been awarded a medal 

of honor pursuant to section 3741, 6241, or 8741 of this title 

or section 491 of title 14. 

‘‘(c) ISSUANCE OF ENROLLMENT CERTIFICATE.—Each living person whose name is entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and 

Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll shall be issued a certificate 

of enrollment on the roll. 

‘‘(d) ENTITLEMENT TO SPECIAL PENSION; NOTICE TO SECRETARY

OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.—The Secretary concerned shall deliver to 

the Secretary of Veterans Affairs a certified copy of each certificate 

of enrollment issued under subsection (c). The copy of the certificate 

shall authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to pay the special 

pension provided by section 1562 of title 38 to the person named 

in the certificate.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 

beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 

item relating to section 1134 the following new item: 

‘‘1134a. Medal of honor: Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor 

Roll.’’. 

(b) SPECIAL PENSION.— 

(1) AUTOMATIC ENTITLEMENT.—Subsection (a) of section 

1562 of title 38, United States Code, is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘each person’’ and inserting ‘‘each living 

person’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘Honor roll’’ and inserting ‘‘Honor Roll’’; 

(C) by striking ‘‘subsection (c) of section 1561 of this 

title’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (d) of section 1134a of title 

10’’; and 

(D) by striking ‘‘date of application therefor under section 1560 of this title’’ and inserting ‘‘date on which the 
H. R. 3304—97 

person’s name is entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force, 

and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll under subsection 

(b) of such section’’. 

(2) ELECTION TO DECLINE SPECIAL PENSION.—Such section 

is further amended by adding at the end the following new 

subsection: 

‘‘(g)(1) A person who is entitled to special pension under subsection (a) may elect not to receive special pension by notifying 

the Secretary of such election in writing. 

‘‘(2) Upon receipt of an election made by a person under paragraph (1) not to receive special pension, the Secretary shall cease 

payments of special pension to the person.’’. 

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— (1) REPEAL OF RECODIFIED PROVISIONS.—Sections 1560 and 

1561 of title 38, United States Code, are repealed. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of sections at the 

beginning of chapter 15 of such title is amended by striking 

the items relating to sections 1560 and 1561. 

(d) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amendments made by 

this section shall apply with respect to Medals of Honor awarded 

on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 564. PROMPT REPLACEMENT OF MILITARY DECORATIONS. 

Section 1135 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): 

‘‘(b) PROMPT REPLACEMENT REQUIRED.—When a request for 

the replacement of a military decoration is received under this 

section or section 3747, 3751, 6253, 8747, or 8751 of this title, 

the Secretary concerned shall ensure that— 

‘‘(1) all actions to be taken with respect to the request, 

including verification of the service record of the recipient of 

the military decoration, are completed within one year; and 

‘‘(2) the replacement military decoration is mailed to the 

person requesting the replacement military decoration within 

90 days after verification of the service record.’’. 

SEC. 565. REVIEW OF ELIGIBILITY FOR, AND AWARD OF, PURPLE 

HEART TO VICTIMS OF THE ATTACKS AT RECRUITING STATION IN LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, AND AT FORT HOOD, 

TEXAS. 

(a) REVIEW REGARDING SPECIFIED ATTACKS.— (1) REVIEW AND AWARD REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the 

military department concerned shall— 

(A) review the circumstances of the attacks that 

occurred at the recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, 

on June 1, 2009, and at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 

5, 2009, in which members of the Armed Forces were 

killed and wounded; and 

(B) award the Purple Heart to each member determined pursuant to such review to be eligible for the award 

of the Purple Heart in connection with the death or 

wounding of the member in the attacks. 

(2) CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN EVIDENCE.—In reviewing 

all the evidence related to the incidents described in paragraph 

(1) and the criteria established under Executive Order 11016 

(Authorizing the Award of the Purple Heart), the Secretary 
H. R. 3304—98 

of the military department concerned shall specifically, but 

not exclusively, assess whether the members of the Armed 

Forces killed or wounded at Fort Hood and Little Rock qualify 

for award of the Purple Heart under the criteria as members 

of the Armed Forces who were killed or wounded as a result 

of an act of an enemy of the United States. 

(3) SUBMISSION.—The results of the review shall be provided to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate 

and the House of Representatives within 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act. 

(4) EXCEPTION.—A Purple Heart may not be awarded 

pursuant to paragraph (1)(B) to a member of the Armed Forces 

whose death or wound in an attack described in paragraph 

(1)(A) was the result of the willful misconduct of the member. 

(b) REVIEW OF THE CRITERIA FOR AWARDING PURPLE HEART.— (1) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the criteria used to determine the eligibility 

of members of the Armed Forces for the award of the Purple 

Heart. The review shall include the policies and procedures 

for determining eligibility for the award of the Purple Heart 

to members who sustain injuries through acts of violence. The 

purpose of the review is to determine whether those criteria 

remain relevant for the broad range of circumstances in and 

outside the United States in which members are killed or 

wounded. 

(2) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—Not later than 180 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate 

and the House of Representatives a report containing the 

results of the review. The report shall include the findings 

of the review and any recommendations the Secretary considers 

appropriate regarding modifying the criteria for eligibility for 

the Purple Heart. 

SEC. 566. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF HONOR 

TO FORMER MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES PREVIOUSLY RECOMMENDED FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF 

HONOR. 

Section 552(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 10 U.S.C. 3741 note) is 

amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘HONOR.—’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) In addition to the authority provided by paragraph (1), 

a Medal of Honor may be awarded to a veteran of the Armed 

Forces who, although not a Jewish-American war veteran or Hispanic-American war veteran described in subsection (b), was identified during the review of service records conducted under subsection 

(a) and regarding whom the Secretary of Defense submitted, before 

January 1, 2014, a recommendation to the President that the President award the Medal of Honor to that veteran.’’. 

SEC. 567. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF HONOR 

FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING THE VIETNAM WAR. 

(a) SERGEANT FIRST CLASS BENNIE G. ADKINS.— 

(1) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwithstanding the 

time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United 

States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the 
H. R. 3304—99 

awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed 

Forces, the President may award the Medal of Honor under 

section 3741 of such title to Bennie G. Adkins of the United 

States Army for the acts of valor during the Vietnam War 

described in paragraph (2). 

(2) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred 

to in paragraph (1) are the actions of then Sergeant First 

Class Bennie G. Adkins of the United States Army serving 

with Special Forces Detachment A–102 from March 9 to 12, 

1966, during the Vietnam War for which he was originally 

awarded the Distinguished-Service Cross. 

(b) SPECIALIST FOUR DONALD P. SLOAT.— 

(1) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwithstanding the 

time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United 

States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the 

awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed 

Forces, the President may award the Medal of Honor under 

section 3741 of such title to Donald P. Sloat of the United 

States Army for the acts of valor during the Vietnam War 

described in paragraph (2). 

(2) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred 

to in paragraph (1) are the actions of then Specialist Four 

Donald P. Sloat of the United States Army serving with 3rd 

Platoon, Delta Company, 2nd Battalion, 1st Infantry, 196th 

Light Infantry Brigade, Americal Division on January 17, 1970, 

during the Vietnam War. 

SEC. 568. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE DISTINGUISHEDSERVICE CROSS FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING THE 

KOREAN AND VIETNAM WARS. 

(a) SERGEANT FIRST CLASS ROBERT F. KEISER.— (1) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwithstanding the 

time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United 

States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the 

awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed 

Forces, the Secretary of the Army may award the Distinguished-Service Cross under section 3742 of such title to Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser for the acts of valor described 

in paragraph (2) during the Korean War. 

(2) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred 

to in paragraph (1) are the actions of Robert F. Keiser’s on 

November 30, 1950, as a member of the 2d Military Police 

Company, 2d Infantry Division, United States Army, during 

the Division’s successful withdrawal from the Kunuri-Sunchon 

Pass. 

(b) SERGEANT FIRST CLASS PATRICK N. WATKINS, JR..— (1) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwithstanding the 

time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United 

States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the 

awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed 

Forces, the Secretary of the Army may award the Distinguished 

Service Cross under section 3742 of that title to Patrick N. 

Watkins, Jr., for the acts of valor described in paragraph (2). 

(2) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred 

to in paragraph (1) are the actions of Sergeant First Class 

Patrick N. Watkins, Jr., from August 22 to August 23, 1968, 

as a member of the United States Army serving in the grade 
H. R. 3304—100 

of Sergeant First Class in the Republic of Vietnam while serving 

with Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 5th Special 

Forces Group (Airborne), 1st Special Forces Regiment. 

(c) SPECIALIST FOUR ROBERT L. TOWLES.— 

(1) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwithstanding the 

time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United 

States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the 

awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed 

Forces, the Secretary of the Army may award the Distinguished 

Service Cross under section 3742 of that title to Robert L. 

Towles for the acts of valor described in paragraph (2). 

(2) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred 

to in paragraph (1) are the actions of Specialist Four Robert 

L. Towles, on November 17, 1965, as a member of the United 

States Army serving in the grade of Specialist Four during 

the Vietnam War while serving in Company D, 2d Battalion, 

7th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division, for which he was originally 

awarded the Bronze Star with ‘‘V’’ Device. 

SEC. 569. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF HONOR 

TO FIRST LIEUTENANT ALONZO H. CUSHING FOR ACTS 

OF VALOR DURING THE CIVIL WAR. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Notwithstanding the time limitations 

specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any 

other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals 

to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President may 

award the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to 

then First Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for conspicuous acts of 

gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of life and beyond the call 

of duty in the Civil War, as described in subsection (b). 

(b) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred 

to in subsection (a) are the actions of then First Lieutenant Alonzo 

H. Cushing while in command of Battery A, 4th United States 

Artillery, Army of the Potomac, at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, on 

July 3, 1863, during the Civil War. 

Subtitle H—Other Studies, Reviews, 

Policies, and Reports 

SEC. 571. REPORT ON FEASIBILITY OF EXPANDING PERFORMANCE 

EVALUATION REPORTS TO INCLUDE 360-DEGREE ASSESSMENT APPROACH. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 

this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees 

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 

a report containing the results of an assessment of the feasibility 

of including a 360-degree assessment approach, modeled after the 

current Department of the Army Multi-Source Assessment and 

Feedback (MSAF) Program, as part of performance evaluation 

reports. 

SEC. 572. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PERSONNEL POLICIES REGARDING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WITH 

HIV OR HEPATITIS B. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 

this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees 
H. R. 3304—101 

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 

a report on Department of Defense personnel policies regarding 

members of the Armed Forces infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or Hepatitis B. The report shall include 

the following: 

(1) A description of policies addressing the enlistment or 

commissioning of individuals with these conditions and retention policies, deployment policies, discharge policies, and disciplinary policies regarding individuals with these conditions. 

(2) An assessment of these policies, including an assessment of whether the policies reflect an evidence-based, medically accurate understanding of how these conditions are contracted, how these conditions can be transmitted to other 

individuals, and the risk of transmission. 

SEC. 573. POLICY ON MILITARY RECRUITMENT AND ENLISTMENT OF 

GRADUATES OF SECONDARY SCHOOLS. 

(a) CONDITIONS ON USE OF TEST, ASSESSMENT, OR SCREENING

TOOLS.—In the case of any test, assessment, or screening tool 

utilized under the policy on recruitment and enlistment required 

by subsection (b) of section 532 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1403; 

10 U.S.C. 503 note) for the purpose of identifying persons for 

recruitment and enlistment in the Armed Forces, the Secretary 

of Defense shall— 

(1) implement a means for ensuring that graduates of 

a secondary school (as defined in section 9101(38) of the 

Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

7801(38)), including all persons described in subsection (a)(2) 

of section 532 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2012, are required to meet the same standard 

on the test, assessment, or screening tool; and 

(2) use uniform testing requirements and grading standards. 

(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in section 532(b) of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 or this 

section shall be construed to permit the Secretary of Defense or 

the Secretary of a military department to create or use a different 

grading standard on any test, assessment, or screening tool utilized 

for the purpose of identifying graduates of a secondary school (as 

defined in section 9101(38) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801(38)), including all persons 

described in subsection (a)(2) of section 532 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, for recruitment and enlistment in the Armed Forces. 

SEC. 574. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON USE OF DETERMINATION OF PERSONALITY DISORDER OR ADJUSTMENT DISORDER AS BASIS TO SEPARATE MEMBERS FROM THE 

ARMED FORCES. 

Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of 

this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit 

to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 

of Representatives a report evaluating— 

(1) the use by the Secretaries of the military departments, 

since January 1, 2007, of the authority to separate members 

of the Armed Forces from the Armed Forces due of unfitness 
H. R. 3304—102 

for duty because of a mental condition not amounting to disability, including separation on the basis of a personality disorder or adjustment disorder and the total number of members 

separated on such basis; 

(2) the extent to which the Secretaries failed to comply 

with regulatory requirements in separating members of the 

Armed Forces on the basis of a personality or adjustment 

disorder; and 

(3) the impact of such a separation on the ability of veterans 

so separated to access service-connected disability compensation, disability severance pay, and disability retirement pay. 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

SEC. 581. ACCOUNTING FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES LISTED 

AS MISSING AND RELATED REPORTS. 

(a) SYSTEM FOR ACCOUNTING FOR MISSING PERSONS.—Section 

1501(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the 

end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(D) the dissemination of appropriate information on the 

status of missing persons to authorized family members.’’. 

(b) REPORT ON ACCOUNTING FOR POW/MIAS.— 

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report 

on accounting for missing persons from covered conflicts. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall 

include the following: 

(A) The total number of missing persons in all covered 

conflicts and in each covered conflict. 

(B) The total number of missing persons in all covered 

conflicts, and in each covered conflict, that are considered 

unrecoverable, including— 

(i) the total number in each conflict that are considered unrecoverable by being lost at sea or in inaccessible terrain; 

(ii) the total number from the Korean War that 

are considered to be located in each of China, North 

Korea, and Russia. 

(C) The total number of missing persons in all covered 

conflicts, and in each covered conflict, that were interred 

without identification, including the locations of interment. 

(D) The number of remains in the custody of the 

Department of Defense that are awaiting identification, 

and the number of such remains estimated by the Department to be likely to be identified using current technology. 

(E) The total number of identifications of remains that 

have been made since January 1, 1970, for all covered 

conflicts and for each covered conflict. 

(F) The number of instances where next of kin have 

refused to provide a DNA sample for the identification 

of recovered remains, for each covered conflict. 
H. R. 3304—103 

(3) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 

(A) The term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ 

means— 

(i) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs of the Senate; and 

(ii) the Committee on Armed Services and the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of 

the House of Representatives. 

(B) The term ‘‘covered conflicts’’ means the conflicts 

specified in or designated under section 1509(a) of title 

10, United States Code, as of the date of the report required 

by paragraph (1). 

(C) The term ‘‘missing persons’’ has the meaning given 

that term in section 1513(1) of such title. 

(c) REPORT ON POW/MIA ACCOUNTING COMMUNITY.— 

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 

to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the 

POW/MIA accounting community. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1)) shall 

including the following: 

(A) A description and assessment of the current structure of the POW/MIA accounting community. 

(B) A description of how the Secretary of Defense will 

ensure increased oversight of the POW/MIA accounting 

mission regardless of changes to the POW/MIA accounting 

community. 

(C) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability 

of reorganizing the community into a single, central command, including— 

(i) an identification of the elements that could 

be organized into such command; and 

(ii) an assessment of cost-savings, advantages, and 

disadvantages of— 

(I) transferring the command and control of 

the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command (JPAC) 

and the Central Identification Laboratory (CIL) 

from the United States Pacific Command to the 

Office of the Secretary of Defense; 

(II) merging the Joint POW/MIA Accounting 

Command and the Central Identification Laboratory with the Defense Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Office (DPMO); and 

(III) merging the Central Identification Laboratory with the Armed Forces DNA Identification 

Lab (AF-DIL). 

(D) A recommendation on the element of the Department of Defense to be responsible for directing POW/MIA 

accounting activities, and on whether all elements of the 

POW/MIA accounting community should report to that element. 

(E) An estimate of the costs to be incurred, and the 

cost savings to be achieved— 

(i) by relocating central POW/MIA accounting 

activities to the continental United States; 
H. R. 3304—104 

(ii) by closing or consolidating existing Joint POW/ 

MIA Accounting Command facilities; and 

(iii) through any actions with respect to the POW/ 

MIA accounting community and POW/MIA accounting 

activities that the Secretary considers advisable for 

purposes of the report. 

(F) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability 

of the use by the Department of university anthropology 

or archaeology programs to conduct field work, particularly 

in politically sensitive environments, including an assessment of— 

(i) the potential cost of the use of such programs; 

(ii) whether the use of such programs would result 

in a greater number of identifications; and 

(iii) whether the use of such programs would be 

consistent with requirements to preserve the integrity 

of the identification process. 

(G) A survey of the manner in which other countries 

conduct accounting for missing persons, and an assessment 

whether such practices can be used by the United States 

to enhance programs to recover and identify missing members of the United States Armed Forces. 

(H) A recommendation as to the advisability of continuing to use a military model for recovery operations, 

including the impact of the use of such model on diplomatic 

relations with countries in which the United States seeks 

to conduct recovery operations. 

(I) Such recommendations for the reorganization of 

the POW/MIA accounting community as the Secretary considers appropriate in light of the other elements of the 

report, including an estimate of the additional numbers 

of recoveries and identifications anticipated to be made 

by the accounting community as a result of implementation 

of the reorganization. 

(3) BASIS IN PREVIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS.—The report 

required by paragraph (1) shall take into account recommendations previously made by the Director of Cost Assessment and 

Program Evaluation, the Inspector General of the Department 

of Defense, and the Comptroller General of the United States 

regarding the organization of the POW/MIA accounting community. 

(4) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 

(A) The term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ 

means— 

(i) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs of the Senate; and 

(ii) the Committee on Armed Services and the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of 

the House of Representatives. 

(B) The term ‘‘POW/MIA accounting community’’ has 

the meaning given that term in section 1509(b)(2) of title 

10, United States Code. 
H. R. 3304—105 

SEC. 582. EXPANSION OF PRIVILEGED INFORMATION AUTHORITIES 

TO DEBRIEFING REPORTS OF CERTAIN RECOVERED PERSONS WHO WERE NEVER PLACED IN A MISSING STATUS. 

(a) EXPANSION OF COVERED REPORTS.—Section 1506 of title 

10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (d)— 

(A) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and 

(B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 

paragraph (2): 

‘‘(2) The Secretary concerned shall withhold from personnel 

files under this section, as privileged information, any survival, 

evasion, resistance, and escape debriefing report provided by a 

person described in section 1501(c) of this title who is returned 

to United States control which is obtained under a promise of 

confidentiality made for the purpose of ensuring the fullest possible 

disclosure of information.’’; and 

(2) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘paragraphs (2) and (3)’’ 

and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (3) and (4)’’. 

(b) DEFINITION APPLICABLE TO COVERED REPORTS.—Section 

1513 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following 

new paragraph: 

‘‘(9) The term ‘survival, evasion, resistance, and escape 

debriefing’ means an interview conducted with a person 

described in section 1501(c) of this title who is returned to 

United States control in order to record the person’s experiences 

while surviving, evading, resisting interrogation or exploitation, 

or escaping.’’. 

SEC. 583. REVISION OF SPECIFIED SENIOR MILITARY COLLEGES TO 

REFLECT CONSOLIDATION OF NORTH GEORGIA COLLEGE 

AND STATE UNIVERSITY AND GAINESVILLE STATE COLLEGE. 

Paragraph (6) of section 2111a(f) of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(6) The University of North Georgia.’’. 

SEC. 584. REVIEW OF SECURITY OF MILITARY INSTALLATIONS, 

INCLUDING BARRACKS, TEMPORARY LODGING FACILITIES, AND MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCES. 

(a) REVIEW OF SECURITY MEASURES.—The Secretary of Defense 

shall conduct a review of security measures on United States military installations, specifically with regard to access to barracks, 

temporary lodging facilities, and multi-family residences on military 

installations, for the purpose of ensuring the safety of members 

of the Armed Forces and their dependents who reside on military 

installations. 

(b) ELEMENTS OF STUDY.—In conducting the review under subsection (a), the Secretary shall— 

(1) identify security gaps on military installations; and 

(2) evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of using 24- 

hour electronic monitoring or other security measures to protect 

members and their dependents. 

(c) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—Not later than 180 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 

to Congress a report containing the results of the study conducted 
H. R. 3304—106 

under subsection (a), including proposed security measures and 

an estimate of the costs— 

(1) to eliminate all security gaps identified under subsection 

(b)(1); and 

(2) to provide 24-hour security monitoring or other security 

measures as evaluated under subsection (b)(2). 

SEC. 585. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO CONCESSIONS CONTRACTS AT 

ARMY NATIONAL MILITARY CEMETERIES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 446 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘§ 4727. Cemetery concessions contracts 

‘‘(a) CONTRACTS AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Army may 

enter into a contract with an appropriate entity for the provision 

of transportation, interpretative, or other necessary or appropriate 

concession services to visitors at the Army National Military Cemeteries. 

‘‘(b) SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS.—(1) The Secretary of the Army 

shall establish and include in each concession contract such requirements as the Secretary determines are necessary to ensure the 

protection, dignity, and solemnity of the cemetery at which services 

are provided under the contract. 

‘‘(2) A concession contract shall not include operation of the 

gift shop at Arlington National Cemetery without the specific prior 

authorization by an Act of Congress. 

‘‘(c) FRANCHISE FEES.—A concession contract shall provide for 

payment to the United States of a franchise fee or such other 

monetary consideration as determined by the Secretary of the Army. 

The Secretary shall ensure that the objective of generating revenue 

for the United States is subordinate to the objectives of honoring 

the service and sacrifices of the deceased members of the armed 

forces and of providing necessary and appropriate services for visitors to the Cemeteries at reasonable rates. 

‘‘(d) SPECIAL ACCOUNT.—All franchise fees (and other monetary 

consideration) collected by the United States under subsection (c) 

shall be deposited into a special account established in the Treasury 

of the United States. The funds deposited in such account shall 

be available for expenditure by the Secretary of the Army, to 

the extent authorized and in such amounts as are provided in 

advance in appropriations Acts, to support activities at the Cemeteries. The funds deposited into the account shall remain available 

until expended. 

‘‘(e) CONCESSION CONTRACT DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘concession contract’ means a contract authorized and entered into 

under this section.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following 

new item: 

‘‘4727. Cemetery concessions contracts.’’. 

SEC. 586. MILITARY SALUTE DURING RECITATION OF PLEDGE OF 

ALLEGIANCE BY MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES NOT 

IN UNIFORM AND BY VETERANS. 

Section 4 of title 4, United States Code, is amended by adding 

at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘Members of the Armed 
H. R. 3304—107 

Forces not in uniform and veterans may render the military salute 

in the manner provided for persons in uniform.’’. 

SEC. 587. IMPROVED CLIMATE ASSESSMENTS AND DISSEMINATION OF 

RESULTS. 

(a) IMPROVED DISSEMINATION OF RESULTS IN CHAIN OF COMMAND.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the results 

of command climate assessments are provided to the relevant individual commander and to the next higher level of command. 

(b) EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE.—The Secretary of each military 

department shall require in the performance evaluations and assessments used by each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of the 

Secretary a statement by the commander regarding whether the 

commander has conducted the required command climate assessments. 

(c) EFFECT OF FAILURE TO CONDUCT ASSESSMENT.—The failure 

of a commander to conduct the required command climate assessments shall be noted in the commander’s performance evaluation. 

TITLE VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER 

PERSONNEL BENEFITS 

Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances 

Sec. 601. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances. Sec. 602. Recognition of additional means by which members of the National Guard 

called into Federal service for a period of 30 days or less may initially 

report for duty for entitlement to basic pay. 

Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays 

Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve forces. 

Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health 

care professionals. Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers. Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special 

pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities. Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays. Sec. 616. One-year extension of authority to provide incentive pay for members of 

precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language proficiency. Sec. 617. Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen enrolled in 

the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. Sec. 618. Health Professions Stipend Program to obtain commissioned officers in 

the reserve components. 

Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Allowances 

Sec. 621. Technical and standardizing amendments to Department of Defense travel and transportation authorities in connection with reform of such authorities. 

Subtitle D—Disability, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits 

Sec. 631. Clarification of prevention of retired pay inversion in the case of members 

whose retired pay is computed using high-three. Sec. 632. Periodic notice to members of the Ready Reserve on early retirement 

credit earned for significant periods of active Federal status or active 

duty. Sec. 633. Improved assistance for Gold Star spouses and other dependents. 

Subtitle E—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and 

Operations 

Sec. 641. Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities from reprisals. 
H. R. 3304—108 

Sec. 642. Modernization of titles of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities for purposes of certain civil service laws. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Sec. 651. Authority to provide certain expenses for care and disposition of human 

remains that were retained by the Department of Defense for forensic 

pathology investigation. 

Sec. 652. Study of the merits and feasibility of providing transitional compensation 

and other transitional benefits to dependents of members separated for 

violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances 

SEC. 601. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY 

INCREASE IN RATES OF BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 

UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES. 

Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’. 

SEC. 602. RECOGNITION OF ADDITIONAL MEANS BY WHICH MEMBERS 

OF THE NATIONAL GUARD CALLED INTO FEDERAL 

SERVICE FOR A PERIOD OF 30 DAYS OR LESS MAY INITIALLY REPORT FOR DUTY FOR ENTITLEMENT TO BASIC 

PAY. 

Subsection (c) of section 204 of title 37, United States Code, 

is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(c)(1) A member of the National Guard who is called into 

Federal service for a period of 30 days or less is entitled to basic 

pay from the date on which the member, in person or by authorized 

telephonic or electronic means, contacts the member’s unit. 

‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) does not authorize any expenditure to be 

paid for a period before the date on which the unit receives the 

member’s contact provided under such paragraph. 

‘‘(3) The Secretary of the Army, with respect to the Army 

National Guard, and the Secretary of the Air Force, with respect 

to the Air National Guard, shall prescribe such regulations as 

may be necessary to carry out this subsection.’’. 

Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and 

Incentive Pays 

SEC. 611. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL 

PAY AUTHORITIES FOR RESERVE FORCES. 

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 

amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 

31, 2014’’: 

(1) Section 308b(g), relating to Selected Reserve reenlistment bonus. 

(2) Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve affiliation 

or enlistment bonus. 

(3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted 

members assigned to certain high-priority units. 

(4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment 

bonus for persons without prior service. 

(5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment 

and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service. 
H. R. 3304—109 

(6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve enlistment 

and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service. 

(7) Section 478a(e), relating to reimbursement of travel 

expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distance. 

(8) Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments 

for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service. 

SEC. 612. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL 

PAY AUTHORITIES FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS. 

(a) TITLE 10 AUTHORITIES.—The following sections of title 10, 

United States Code, are amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ 

and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’: 

(1) Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer candidate 

accession program. 

(2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education 

loans for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected 

Reserve. 

(b) TITLE 37 AUTHORITIES.—The following sections of title 37, 

United States Code, are amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ 

and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’: 

(1) Section 302c–1(f), relating to accession and retention 

bonuses for psychologists. 

(2) Section 302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for registered nurses. 

(3) Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay for 

nurse anesthetists. 

(4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected 

Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime specialties. 

(5) Section 302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for dental 

officers. 

(6) Section 302j(a), relating to accession bonus for pharmacy 

officers. 

(7) Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for medical 

officers in critically short wartime specialties. 

(8) Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental 

specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties. 

SEC. 613. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF SPECIAL PAY AND BONUS 

AUTHORITIES FOR NUCLEAR OFFICERS. 

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 

amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 

31, 2014’’: 

(1) Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active service. 

(2) Section 312b(c), relating to nuclear career accession 

bonus. 

(3) Section 312c(d), relating to nuclear career annual incentive bonus. 

SEC. 614. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO TITLE 

37 CONSOLIDATED SPECIAL PAY, INCENTIVE PAY, AND 

BONUS AUTHORITIES. 

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 

amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 

31, 2014’’: 
H. R. 3304—110 

(1) Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for 

enlisted members. 

(2) Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for 

officers. 

(3) Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive 

pay authorities for nuclear officers. 

(4) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive 

pay and bonus authorities for officers. 

(5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive 

pay authorities for officers in health professions. 

(6) Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay. 

(7) Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special 

duty pay. 

(8) Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus. 

(9) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high 

priority units. 

SEC. 615. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PAYMENT OF OTHER TITLE 37 BONUSES AND SPECIAL PAYS. 

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 

amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 

31, 2014’’: 

(1) Section 301b(a), relating to aviation officer retention 

bonus. 

(2) Section 307a(g), relating to assignment incentive pay. 

(3) Section 308(g), relating to reenlistment bonus for active 

members. 

(4) Section 309(e), relating to enlistment bonus. 

(5) Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new officers in critical skills. 

(6) Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for conversion 

to military occupational specialty to ease personnel shortage. 

(7) Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for transfer 

between armed forces. 

(8) Section 330(f), relating to accession bonus for officer 

candidates. 

SEC. 616. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE INCENTIVE PAY FOR MEMBERS OF PRECOMMISSIONING PROGRAMS PURSUING FOREIGN LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY. 

Section 316a(g) of title 37, United States Code is amended 

by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’. 

SEC. 617. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE BONUS TO CERTAIN CADETS AND 

MIDSHIPMEN ENROLLED IN THE SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS’ TRAINING CORPS. 

(a) BONUS AUTHORIZED.—Chapter 5 of title 37, United States 

Code, is amended by inserting after section 335 the following new 

section: 

‘‘§ 336. Contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen 

enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training 

Corps 

‘‘(a) CONTRACTING BONUS AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary concerned may pay a bonus under this section to a cadet or midshipman 
H. R. 3304—111 

enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps who executes 

a written agreement described in subsection (c). 

‘‘(b) AMOUNT OF BONUS.—The amount of a bonus under subsection (a) may not exceed $5,000. 

‘‘(c) AGREEMENT.—A written agreement referred to in subsection 

(a) is a written agreement by the cadet or midshipman— 

‘‘(1) to complete field training or a practice cruise under 

section 2104(b)(6)(A)(ii) of title 10; 

‘‘(2) to complete advanced training under chapter 103 of 

title 10; 

‘‘(3) to accept a commission or appointment as an officer 

of the armed forces; and 

‘‘(4) to serve on active duty. 

‘‘(d) PAYMENT METHOD.—Upon acceptance of a written agreement under subsection (a) by the Secretary concerned, the total 

amount of the bonus payable under the agreement becomes fixed. 

The agreement shall specify when the bonus will be paid and 

whether the bonus will be paid in a lump sum or in installments. 

‘‘(e) REPAYMENT.—A person who, having received all or part 

of a bonus under subsection (a), fails to fulfill the terms of the 

written agreement required by such subsection for receipt of the 

bonus shall be subject to the repayment provisions of section 373 

of this title. 

‘‘(f) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary concerned shall issue such 

regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section. 

‘‘(g) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.—No agreement under this 

section may be entered into after December 31, 2014.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating 

to section 335 the following new item: 

‘‘336. Contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve 

Officers’ Training Corps.’’. 

SEC. 618. HEALTH PROFESSIONS STIPEND PROGRAM TO OBTAIN 

COMMISSIONED OFFICERS IN THE RESERVE COMPONENTS. 

(a) AVAILABILITY OF STIPEND FOR REGISTERED NURSES IN CRITICAL SPECIALTIES.—Subsection (d) of section 16201 of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph (B) and 

inserting the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(B) is eligible for appointment as a Reserve officer for 

service in a reserve component in a Nurse Corps or as a 

nurse; and’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (B) and 

inserting the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(B) the participant shall not be eligible to receive such 

stipend before being appointed as a Reserve officer for service 

in the Ready Reserve in a Nurse Corps or as a nurse;’’. 

(b) SERVICE REQUIRED IN SELECTED RESERVE.—Such section 

is further amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘the Ready Reserve’’ and 

inserting ‘‘the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve’’; 

(2) in subsection (c)(2), by striking subparagraph (D) and 

inserting the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(D) the participant shall agree to serve, upon successful 

completion of the program, one year in the Selected Reserve 
H. R. 3304—112 

for each six months, or part thereof, for which the stipend 

is provided.’’; 

(3) in subsection (d)(2), by striking subparagraph (D) and 

inserting the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(D) the participant shall agree to serve, upon successful 

completion of the program, one year in the Selected Reserve 

for each six months, or part thereof, for which the stipend 

is provided.’’; and 

(4) in subsection (e)(2)(D), by striking ‘‘the Ready Reserve’’ 

and inserting ‘‘the Selected Reserve’’. 

(c) AMOUNT OF STIPEND.—Subsection (g) of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(g) AMOUNT OF STIPEND.—The amount of a stipend under 

an agreement under subsection (b), (c), (d), or (f) shall be the 

stipend rate in effect for participants in the Armed Forces Health 

Professions Scholarship Program under section 2121(d) of this 

title.’’. 

Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation 

Allowances 

SEC. 621. TECHNICAL AND STANDARDIZING AMENDMENTS TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION 

AUTHORITIES IN CONNECTION WITH REFORM OF SUCH 

AUTHORITIES. 

(a) ESCORTS OF DEPENDENTS OF MEMBERS.— (1) INCORPORATION OF ESCORTS OF DEPENDENTS UNDER GEN- ERAL AUTHORITY.—Section 451(a)(2)(C) of title 37, United States 

Code, is amended by inserting before the period the following: 

‘‘or as an escort or attendant for dependents of a member 

for necessary travel performed not later than one year after 

the member is unable to accompany the dependents who are 

incapable of traveling alone’’. 

(2) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY.—(A) Section 1036 

of title 10, United States Code, is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 

of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 

1036. 

(b) TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION OF DEPENDENT PATIENTS.— Section 1040 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘round-trip transportation’’ and all that follows through ‘‘may be paid at the expense 

of the United States’’ and inserting ‘‘travel and transportation 

allowances may be furnished to necessary attendants. The 

dependents and any attendants shall be furnished such travel 

and transportation allowances as specified in regulations prescribed under section 464 of title 37.’’; and 

(2) by striking subsection (d). 

(c) TRAVEL IN CONNECTION WITH LEAVE CANCELLED DUE TO

CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.— (1) INCORPORATION OF EXPENSES UNDER GENERAL

AUTHORITY.—Section 453 of title 37, United States Code, is 

amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(g) REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAVEL IN CONNECTION WITH LEAVE

CANCELLED DUE TO CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.—A member may 

be reimbursed as specified in regulations prescribed under section 
H. R. 3304—113 

464 of this title for travel and related expenses incurred by the 

member as a result of the cancellation of previously approved leave 

when the leave is cancelled in conjunction with the member’s 

participation in a contingency operation and the cancellation occurs 

within 48 hours of the time the leave would have commenced. 

The settlement for reimbursement under this subsection is final 

and conclusive.’’. 

(2) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY.—(A) Section 1053a 

of title 10, United States Code, is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 

of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 

1053a. 

(d) TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION FOR TRAVEL FOR SPECIALTY

HEALTH CARE.—Section 1074i of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘reimbursement for reasonable travel expenses’’ and inserting ‘‘travel and transportation 

allowances as specified in regulations prescribed under section 

464 of title 37’’; and 

(2) in subsection (b), striking ‘‘REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAVEL

UNDER EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES.—The Secretary of 

Defense may provide reimbursement for reasonable travel 

expenses of’’ and inserting ‘‘ALLOWABLE TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION UNDER EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES.—The Secretary 

of Defense may provide travel and transportation allowances 

as specified in the regulations referred to in subsection (a) 

for’’. 

(e) TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE

DISPOSITION OF REMAINS OF MEMBERS.—Section 1482(a)(8) of title 

10, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘and roundtrip 

transportation and prescribed allowances’’ and inserting ‘‘and travel 

and transportation allowances as specified in regulations prescribed 

under section 464 of title 37’’. 

(f) TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION IN CONNECTION WITH

FUNERAL HONORS FUNCTIONS AT FUNERALS FOR VETERANS.—Section 1491(d)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

striking ‘‘transportation (or reimbursement for transportation) and 

expenses’’ and inserting ‘‘travel and transportation allowances as 

specified in regulations prescribed under section 464 of title 37’’. 

(g) REPEAL OF REDUNDANT AUTHORITY ON MOTOR VEHICLE

TRANSPORTATION OR STORAGE FOR MEMBERS UNDERGOING PCS OR

EXTENDED DEPLOYMENT.— 

(1) REPEAL.—Section 2634 of title 10, United States Code, 

is repealed. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 

beginning of chapter 157 of such title is amended by striking 

the item relating to section 2634. 

(h) CLARIFICATION OF LIMITATION ON TRANSPORTATION OF

HOUSEHOLD GOODS.—Section 453(c)(3) of title 37, United States 

Code, is amended by striking ‘‘(including packing, crating, and 

household goods in temporary storage)’’ and inserting ‘‘(including 

household goods in temporary storage, but excluding packing and 

crating)’’. 
H. R. 3304—114 

Subtitle D—Disability, Retired Pay, and 

Survivor Benefits 

SEC. 631. CLARIFICATION OF PREVENTION OF RETIRED PAY INVERSION IN THE CASE OF MEMBERS WHOSE RETIRED PAY 

IS COMPUTED USING HIGH-THREE. 

(a) CLARIFICATION.—Subsection (f) of section 1401a of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘PREVENTION OF RETIRED PAY INVER- SIONS.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the’’ 

and inserting ‘‘PREVENTION OF RETIRED PAY INVERSIONS

FOR MEMBERS WITH RETIRED PAY COMPUTED USING FINAL

BASIC PAY.—The’’; and 

(B) by inserting ‘‘who first became a member of a 

uniformed service before September 8, 1980, and’’ after 

‘‘of an armed force’’; 

(2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and 

(3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): 

‘‘(2) PREVENTION OF RETIRED PAY INVERSIONS FOR MEMBERS

WITH RETIRED PAY COMPUTED USING HIGH-THREE.—Subject to 

subsections (d) and (e), the monthly retired pay of a member 

or former member of an armed force who first became a member 

of a uniformed service on or after September 8, 1980, may 

not be less, on the date on which the member or former member 

initially becomes entitled to such pay, than the monthly retired 

pay to which the member or former member would be entitled 

on that date if the member or former member had become 

entitled to retired pay on an earlier date, adjusted to reflect 

any applicable increases in such pay under this section. However, in the case of a member or former member whose retired 

pay is computed subject to section 1407(f) of this title, paragraph (1) (rather than the preceding sentence) shall apply 

in the same manner as if the member or former member 

first became a member of a uniformed service before September 

8, 1980, but only with respect to a calculation as of the date 

on which the member or former member first became entitled 

to retired pay.’’. 

(b) CROSS-REFERENCE AMENDMENTS.—Such section is further 

amended by striking ‘‘subsection (f)(2)’’ in subsections (c)(1), (c)(2), 

(d), and (e) and inserting ‘‘subsection (f)(3)’’. 

(c) APPLICABILITY.—Paragraph (2) of section 1401a(f) of title 

10, United States Code, as added by the amendment made by 

subsection (a)(3), applies to the computation of retired pay or 

retainer pay of any person who first became a member of a uniformed service on or after September 8, 1980, regardless of when 

the member first becomes entitled to retired or retainer pay. 

SEC. 632. PERIODIC NOTICE TO MEMBERS OF THE READY RESERVE 

ON EARLY RETIREMENT CREDIT EARNED FOR SIGNIFICANT PERIODS OF ACTIVE FEDERAL STATUS OR ACTIVE 

DUTY. 

Section 12731(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
H. R. 3304—115 

‘‘(3) The Secretary concerned shall periodically notify each 

member of the Ready Reserve described by paragraph (2) of the 

current eligibility age for retired pay of such member under this 

section, including any reduced eligibility age by reason of the operation of that paragraph. Notice shall be provided by such means 

as the Secretary considers appropriate taking into account the 

cost of provision of notice and the convenience of members.’’. 

SEC. 633. IMPROVED ASSISTANCE FOR GOLD STAR SPOUSES AND 

OTHER DEPENDENTS. 

(a) ADVOCATES FOR GOLD STAR SPOUSES AND OTHER DEPENDENTS.—Each Secretary of a military department shall designate 

for each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of such Secretary 

a member of such Armed Force or civilian employee of such military 

department to assist spouses and other dependents of members 

of such Armed Force (including reserve components thereof) who 

die on active duty through the provision of the following services: 

(1) Addressing complaints by spouses and other dependents 

of deceased members regarding casualty assistance or receipt 

of benefits authorized by law for such spouses and dependents. 

(2) Providing support to such spouses and dependents 

regarding such casualty assistance or receipt of such benefits. 

(3) Making reports to appropriate officers or officials in 

the Department of Defense or the military department concerned regarding resolution of such complaints, including recommendations regarding the settlement of claims with respect 

to such benefits, as appropriate. 

(4) Performing such other actions as the Secretary of the 

military department concerned considers appropriate. 

(b) TRAINING FOR CASUALTY ASSISTANCE PERSONNEL.— (1) TRAINING PROGRAM REQUIRED.—The Secretary of 

Defense shall implement a standardized comprehensive 

training program on casualty assistance for the following personnel of the Department of Defense: 

(A) Casualty assistance officers. 

(B) Casualty assistance calls officers. 

(C) Casualty assistance representatives. 

(2) GENERAL ELEMENTS.—The training program required 

by paragraph (1) shall include training designed to ensure 

that the personnel specified in that paragraph provide the 

spouse and other dependents of a deceased member of the 

Armed Forces with accurate information on the benefits to 

which they are entitled and other casualty assistance available 

to them when the member dies while serving on active duty 

in the Armed Forces. 

(3) SERVICE-SPECIFIC ELEMENTS.—The Secretary of the military department concerned may, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, provide for the inclusion in the training 

program required by paragraph (1) that is provided to casualty 

assistance personnel of such military department such elements 

of training that are specific or unique to the requirements 

or particulars of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of 

such military department as the Secretary of the military 

department concerned considers appropriate. 

(4) FREQUENCY OF TRAINING.—Training shall be provided 

under the program required by paragraph (1) not less often 

than annually. 
H. R. 3304—116 

Subtitle E—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and Operations 

SEC. 641. EXPANSION OF PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES OF NONAPPROPRIATED FUND INSTRUMENTALITIES FROM 

REPRISALS. 

Section 1587(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by inserting after ‘‘take or fail to take’’ the following: ‘‘, or threaten 

to take or fail to take,’’. 

SEC. 642. MODERNIZATION OF TITLES OF NONAPPROPRIATED FUND 

INSTRUMENTALITIES FOR PURPOSES OF CERTAIN CIVIL 

SERVICE LAWS. 

Section 2105(c) of title 5, United States Code, is amended 

in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘Army and Air 

Force Motion Picture Service, Navy Ship’s Stores Ashore’’ and 

inserting ‘‘Navy Ships Stores Program’’. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

SEC. 651. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE CERTAIN EXPENSES FOR CARE 

AND DISPOSITION OF HUMAN REMAINS THAT WERE 

RETAINED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR 

FORENSIC PATHOLOGY INVESTIGATION. 

(a) DISPOSITION OF REMAINS OF PERSONS WHOSE DEATH IS

INVESTIGATED BY THE ARMED FORCES MEDICAL EXAMINER.— (1) COVERED DECEDENTS.—Section 1481(a) of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

following new paragraph: 

‘‘(10) To the extent authorized under section 1482(g) of 

this title, any person not otherwise covered by the preceding 

paragraphs whose remains (or partial remains) have been 

retained by the Secretary concerned for purposes of a forensic 

pathology investigation by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner 

under section 1471 of this title.’’. 

(2) AUTHORIZED EXPENSES RELATING TO CARE AND DISPOSITION OF REMAINS.—Section 1482 of such title is amended by 

adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(g)(1) The payment of expenses incident to the recovery, care, 

and disposition of the remains of a decedent covered by section 

1481(a)(10) of this title is limited to those expenses that, as determined under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, 

would not have been incurred but for the retention of those remains 

for purposes of a forensic pathology investigation by the Armed 

Forces Medical Examiner under section 1471 of this title. 

‘‘(2) In a case covered by paragraph (1), if the person designated 

under subsection (c) to direct disposition of the remains of a 

decedent does not direct disposition of the remains that were 

retained for the forensic pathology investigation, the Secretary may 

pay for the transportation of those remains to, and interment or 

inurnment of those remains in, an appropriate place selected by 

the Secretary, in lieu of the transportation authorized to be paid 

under paragraph (8) of subsection (a). 
H. R. 3304—117 

‘‘(3) In a case covered by paragraph (1), expenses that may 

be paid do not include expenses with respect to an escort under 

paragraph (8) of subsection (a), whether or not on a reimbursable 

basis. 

‘‘(4) The Secretary concerned may pay any other expenses 

relating to the remains of such a decedent that are authorized 

to be paid under this section on a reimbursable basis. Amounts 

reimbursed to the Secretary concerned under this subsection shall 

be credited to appropriations available at the time of reimbursement 

for the payment of such expenses.’’. 

(b) CLARIFICATION OF COVERAGE OF INURNMENT.—Section 

1482(a)(9) of such title is amended by inserting ‘‘or inurnment’’ 

after ‘‘Interment’’. 

(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 1482(f) of such title is 

amended by striking the third sentence and inserting the following 

new sentence: ‘‘The Secretary concerned may pay any other 

expenses relating to the remains of such a decedent that are authorized to be paid under this section only on a reimbursable basis.’’. 

SEC. 652. STUDY OF THE MERITS AND FEASIBILITY OF PROVIDING 

TRANSITIONAL COMPENSATION AND OTHER TRANSITIONAL BENEFITS TO DEPENDENTS OF MEMBERS SEPARATED FOR VIOLATION OF THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE. 

(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct 

a study regarding the merits and feasibility of providing transitional 

compensation and other transitional benefits to dependents or 

former dependents of members of the Armed Forces who are separated from the Armed Forces for a violation of the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice under the circumstances described in subsection 

(b). 

(b) COVERED MEMBERS AND CIRCUMSTANCES.—The scope of the 

study required by subsection (a) is limited to those circumstances 

in which members of the Armed Forces— 

(1) are convicted by court-martial of an offense under 

chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice); 

(2) are separated from active duty pursuant to the sentence 

of the court-martial; and 

(3) forfeit all pay and allowances pursuant to such sentence. 

(c) STUDY ELEMENTS.—In conducting the study required by 

subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consider the following: 

(1) The appropriateness of providing transitional compensation and other benefits, including commissary and exchange 

benefits, to dependents or former dependents of members 

described in subsection (b), particularly in situations in which 

such dependents or former dependents would be entitled, or 

soon be entitled, to such benefits on account of the years of 

service of a member. 

(2) Whether there may be instances in which the provision 

of such transitional compensation would not be appropriate. 

(3) Whether such transitional compensation should be limited to dependent children of members described in subsection 

(b). 

(4) The appropriate duration of such transitional compensation for such dependents or former dependents. 
H. R. 3304—118 

(5) The potential duplication of such transitional compensation with benefits otherwise available for such dependents or 

former dependents under title 10, United States Code, or other 

laws. 

(d) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—Not later than 180 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate 

and the House of Representatives a report containing the results 

of the study required by subsection (a), including the Secretary’s 

determination regarding the need for transitional compensation. 

TITLE VII—HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits 

Sec. 701. Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain beneficiaries enrolled 

in TRICARE Prime. 

Sec. 702. Mental health care treatment through telemedicine. 

Sec. 703. Comprehensive policy on improvements to care and transition of members 

of the Armed Forces with urotrauma. 

Sec. 704. Pilot program on investigational treatment of members of the Armed 

Forces for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder. 

Subtitle B—Health Care Administration 

Sec. 711. Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences to enter 

into contracts and agreements and make grants to other nonprofit entities. 

Sec. 712. Pilot program on increased third-party collection reimbursements in military medical treatment facilities. Sec. 713. Electronic health records of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 

Sec. 721. Display of budget information for embedded mental health providers of 

the reserve components. Sec. 722. Report on role of Department of Veterans Affairs in certain Centers of Excellence. 

Sec. 723. Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries. 

Sec. 724. Report on provision of advanced prosthetics and orthotics to members of 

the Armed Forces and veterans. 

Sec. 725. Comptroller General reports on TRICARE recovery audit program and 

availability of compounded pharmaceuticals. 

Subtitle A—TRICARE and Other Health 

Care Benefits 

SEC. 701. FUTURE AVAILABILITY OF TRICARE PRIME FOR CERTAIN 

BENEFICIARIES ENROLLED IN TRICARE PRIME. 

Section 732 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1816) is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): 

‘‘(b) ACCESS TO TRICARE PRIME.— ‘‘(1) ONE-TIME ELECTION.—Subject to paragraph (3), the 

Secretary shall ensure that each affected eligible beneficiary 

who is enrolled in TRICARE Prime as of September 30, 2013, 

may make a one-time election to continue such enrollment 

in TRICARE Prime, notwithstanding that a contract described 

in subsection (a)(2)(A) does not allow for such enrollment based 

on the location in which such beneficiary resides. The beneficiary may continue such enrollment in TRICARE Prime so 
H. R. 3304—119 

long as the beneficiary resides in the same ZIP code as the 

ZIP code in which the beneficiary resided at the time of such 

election. 

‘‘(2) ENROLLMENT IN TRICARE STANDARD.—If an affected 

eligible beneficiary makes the one-time election under paragraph (1), the beneficiary may thereafter elect to enroll in 

TRICARE Standard at any time in accordance with a contract 

described in subsection (a)(2)(A). 

‘‘(3) RESIDENCE AT TIME OF ELECTION.—An affected eligible 

beneficiary may not make the one-time election under paragraph (1) if, at the time of such election, the beneficiary does 

not reside— 

‘‘(A) in a ZIP code that is in a region described in 

subsection (c)(1)(B); and 

‘‘(B) within 100 miles of a military medical treatment 

facility. 

‘‘(4) NETWORK.—In continuing enrollment in TRICARE 

Prime pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary may determine 

whether to maintain a TRICARE network of providers in an 

area that is between 40 and 100 miles of a military medical 

treatment facility.’’. 

SEC. 702. MENTAL HEALTH CARE TREATMENT THROUGH TELEMEDICINE. 

(a) PROVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH CARE VIA TELEMEDICINE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out the Transitional Assistance Management Program, the Secretary of Defense may 

extend the coverage of such program for covered individuals 

for an additional 180 days for mental health care provided 

through telemedicine. 

(2) REPORT.—If the Secretary extends coverage under paragraph (1), by not later than one year after the date of carrying 

out such extension, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following: 

(A) The rate at which individuals are using the 

extended coverage provided pursuant to paragraph (1). 

(B) A description of the mental health care provided 

pursuant to such subsection. 

(C) An analysis of how the Secretary and the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs coordinate the continuation of care with 

respect to veterans who are no longer eligible for the 

Transitional Assistance Management Program. 

(D) Any other factors the Secretary of Defense determines necessary with respect to extending coverage of the 

Transitional Assistance Management Program. 

(3) TERMINATION.—The authority of the Secretary to carry 

out subsection (a) shall terminate on December 31, 2018. 

(b) REPORT ON USE OF TELEMEDICINE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees a report on the use of 

telemedicine to improve the diagnosis and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and mental 

health conditions. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall 

address the following: 
H. R. 3304—120 

(A) The current status, as of the date of the report, 

of telemedicine initiatives within the Department of 

Defense to diagnose and treat post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and mental health conditions. 

(B) Plans for integrating telemedicine into the military 

health care system, including in health care delivery, 

records management, medical education, public health, and 

private sector partnerships. 

(C) The status of the integration of the telemedicine 

initiatives of the Department with the telemedicine initiatives of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

(D) A description and assessment of challenges to the 

use of telemedicine as a means of in-home treatment, outreach in rural areas, and in settings that provide group 

treatment or therapy in connection with treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and 

mental health conditions, and a description and assessment 

of efforts to address such challenges. 

(E) A description of privacy issues related to the use 

of telemedicine for the treatment of post-traumatic stress 

disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and mental health conditions, and recommendations for mechanisms to remedy any 

privacy concerns relating to such use of telemedicine. 

(F) A description of professional licensing issues with 

respect to licensed medical providers who provide treatment 

using telemedicine. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘covered individual’’ means an individual 

who— 

(A) during the initial 180-day period of being enrolled 

in the Transitional Assistance Management Program, 

received any mental health care; or 

(B) during the one-year period preceding separation 

or discharge from the Armed Forces, received any mental 

health care. 

(2) The term ‘‘telemedicine’’ means the use by a health 

care provider of telecommunications to assist in the diagnosis 

or treatment of a patient’s medical condition. 

SEC. 703. COMPREHENSIVE POLICY ON IMPROVEMENTS TO CARE AND 

TRANSITION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WITH 

UROTRAUMA. 

(a) COMPREHENSIVE POLICY REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and 

the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly develop and 

implement a comprehensive policy on improvements to the 

care, management, and transition of recovering members of 

the Armed Forces with urotrauma. 

(2) SCOPE OF POLICY.—The policy shall cover each of the 

following: 

(A) The care and management of the specific needs 

of members who are urotrauma patients, including eligibility for the Recovery Care Coordinator Program pursuant 

to the Wounded Warrior Act (10 U.S.C. 1071 note). 
H. R. 3304—121 

(B) The return of members who have recovered to 

active duty when appropriate. 

(C) The transition of recovering members from receipt 

of care and services through the Department of Defense 

to receipt of care and services through the Department 

of Veterans Affairs. 

(b) REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after implementing the policy under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary of 

Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly 

submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report 

that includes— 

(A) a review that identifies gaps in the care of members 

who are urotrauma patients; and 

(B) suggested options to respond to such gaps. 

(2) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.— 

In this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means the following: 

(A) The Committees on Armed Services of the Senate 

and the House of Representatives. 

(B) The Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate 

and the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 704. PILOT PROGRAM ON INVESTIGATIONAL TREATMENT OF 

MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES FOR TRAUMATIC BRAIN 

INJURY AND POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER. 

(a) PILOT PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Defense 

shall carry out a pilot program under which the Secretary shall 

establish a process for randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials 

of investigational treatments (including diagnostic testing) of traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder received by 

members of the Armed Forces in health care facilities other than 

military treatment facilities. 

(b) CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL.—The approval by the Secretary 

for a treatment pursuant to subsection (a) shall be subject to the 

following conditions: 

(1) Any drug or device used in the treatment must be 

approved, cleared, or made subject to an investigational use 

exemption by the Food and Drug Administration, and the use 

of the drug or device must comply with rules of the Food 

and Drug Administration applicable to investigational new 

drugs or investigational devices. 

(2) The treatment must be approved by the Secretary following approval by an institutional review board operating 

in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary of Health 

and Human Services, in addition to regulations issued by the 

Secretary of Defense regarding institutional review boards. 

(3) The patient receiving the treatment may not be a retired 

member of the Armed Forces who is entitled to benefits under 

part A, or eligible to enroll under part B, of title XVIII of 

the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.). 

(c) ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary may 

establish additional restrictions or conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to ensure the protection of human research subjects, appropriate fiscal management, and the validity of the 

research results. 
H. R. 3304—122 

(d) DATA COLLECTION AND AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary shall 

develop and maintain a database containing data from each patient 

case involving the use of a treatment under this section. The Secretary shall ensure that the database preserves confidentiality and 

that any use of the database or disclosures of such data are limited 

to such use and disclosures permitted by law and applicable regulations. 

(e) REPORTS TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 days after the 

last day of each fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives a report on the implementation of this section 

and any available results on investigational treatment clinical trials 

authorized under this section during such fiscal year. 

(f) TERMINATION.—The authority of the Secretary to carry out 

the pilot program authorized by subsection (a) shall terminate 

on December 31, 2018. 

Subtitle B—Health Care Administration 

SEC. 711. AUTHORITY OF UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF 

HEALTH SCIENCES TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS AND 

AGREEMENTS AND MAKE GRANTS TO OTHER NONPROFIT 

ENTITIES. 

Section 2113(g)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (B)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘, or any other nonprofit entity’’ after 

‘‘Military Medicine’’; and 

(B) by inserting ‘‘, or nonprofit entity,’’ after ‘‘such 

Foundation’’; and 

(2) in subparagraph (C)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘, or any other nonprofit entity,’’ after 

‘‘Military Medicine’’; and 

(B) by inserting ‘‘, or nonprofit entity,’’ after ‘‘such 

foundation’’. 

SEC. 712. PILOT PROGRAM ON INCREASED THIRD-PARTY COLLECTION 

REIMBURSEMENTS IN MILITARY MEDICAL TREATMENT 

FACILITIES. 

(a) PILOT PROGRAM.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, in coordination 

with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall carry 

out a pilot program to demonstrate and assess the feasibility 

of implementing processes described in paragraph (2) to 

increase the amounts collected under section 1095 of title 10, 

United States Code, from a third-party payer for charges for 

health care services incurred by the United States at a military 

medical treatment facility. 

(2) PROCESSES DESCRIBED.—The processes described in this 

paragraph are commercially available enhanced recovery practices for medical payment collection, including revenue-cycle 

management together with rates and percentages of collection 

in accordance with industry standards for such practices. 

(b) REQUIREMENTS.—In carrying out the pilot program under 

subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall— 

(1) identify and analyze the best practice option, including 

commercial best practices, with respect to the processes 
H. R. 3304—123 

described in subsection (a)(2) that are used in nonmilitary 

health care facilities; and 

(2) conduct a cost-benefit analysis to assess measurable 

results of the pilot program, including an analysis of— 

(A) the different processes used in the pilot program; 

(B) the amount of third-party collections that resulted 

from such processes; 

(C) the cost to implement and sustain such processes; 

and 

(D) any other factors the Secretary determines appropriate to assess the pilot program. 

(c) LOCATIONS.—The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program 

under subsection (a)(1)— 

(1) at military installations that have a military medical 

treatment facility with inpatient and outpatient capabilities; 

and 

(2) at a number of such installations of different military 

departments that the Secretary determines sufficient to fully 

assess the results of the pilot program. 

(d) DURATION.—The Secretary shall commence the pilot program under subsection (a)(1) by not later than 270 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act and shall carry out such 

program for three years. 

(e) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after completing the 

pilot program under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a report describing the 

results of the program, including— 

(1) a comparison of— 

(A) the processes described in subsection (a)(2) that 

were used in the military medical treatment facilities 

participating in the program; and 

(B) the third-party collection processes used by military 

medical treatment facilities not included in the program; 

(2) a cost analysis of implementing the processes described 

in subsection (a)(2) for third-party collections at military medical treatment facilities; 

(3) an assessment of the program, including any recommendations to improve third-party collections; and 

(4) an analysis of the methods employed by the military 

departments prior to the program with respect to collecting 

charges from third-party payers incurred at military medical 

treatment facilities, including specific data with respect to the 

dollar amount of third-party collections that resulted from each 

method used throughout the military departments. 

SEC. 713. ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs have failed to implement a solution that allows for 

seamless electronic sharing of medical health care data; and 

(2) despite the significant amount of read-only information 

shared between the Department of Defense and Department 

of Veterans Affairs, most of the information shared as of the 

date of the enactment of this Act is not standardized or available in real time to support all clinical decisions. 
H. R. 3304—124 

(b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs— 

(1) shall each ensure that the electronic health record systems of the Department of Defense and the Department of 

Veterans Affairs are interoperable with an integrated display 

of data, or a single electronic health record, by complying 

with the national standards and architectural requirements 

identified by the Interagency Program Office of the Departments (in this section referred to as the ‘‘Office’’), in collaboration with the Office of the National Coordinator for Health 

Information Technology of the Department of Health and 

Human Services; and 

(2) shall each deploy modernized electronic health record 

software supporting clinicians of the Departments by no later 

than December 31, 2016, while ensuring continued support 

and compatibility with the interoperability platform and full 

standards-based interoperability. 

(c) DESIGN PRINCIPLES.—The interoperable electronic health 

records with integrated display of data, or a single electronic health 

record, established under subsection (b) shall adhere to the following 

principles: 

(1) To the extent practicable, efforts to establish such 

records shall be based on objectives, activities, and milestones 

established by the Joint Executive Committee Joint Strategic 

Plan Fiscal Years 2013–2015, as well as future addendums 

or revisions. 

(2) Transition the current data exchanges between the 

Departments and private sector health care providers where 

practical to modern, open-architecture frameworks that use 

computable data mapped to national standards to make data 

available for determining medical trends and for enhanced clinician decision support. 

(3) Principles with respect to open architecture standards, 

including— 

(A) adoption of national data standards; 

(B) if such national standards do not exist as of the 

date on which the record is being established, adoption 

of the articulation of data of the Health Data Dictionary 

until such national standards are established; 

(C) use of enterprise investment strategies that maximize the use of commercial best practices to ensure robust 

competition and best value; 

(D) aggressive life-cycle sustainment planning that 

uses proven technology insertion strategies and product 

upgrade techniques; 

(E) enforcement of system design transparency, continuous design disclosure and improvement, and peer reviews 

that align with the requirements of the Federal Acquisition 

Regulation; and 

(F) strategies for data management rights to ensure 

a level competitive playing field and access to alternative 

solutions and sources across the life-cycle of the programs. 

(4) By the point of deployment, such record must be at 

a generation 3 level or better for a health information technology system. 

(5) To the extent the Secretaries consider feasible and 

advisable, principles with respect to— 
H. R. 3304—125 

(A) the creation of a health data authoritative source 

by the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs that can be accessed by multiple providers 

and standardizes the input of new medical information; 

(B) the ability of patients of both the Department of 

Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to 

download, or otherwise receive electronically, the medical 

records of the patient; and 

(C) the feasibility of establishing a secure, remote, 

network-accessible computer storage system to provide 

members of the Armed Forces and veterans the ability 

to upload the health care records of the member or veteran 

if the member or veteran elects to do so and allow medical 

providers of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to access such records in the 

course of providing care to the member or veteran. 

(d) PROGRAMS PLAN.—Not later than January 31, 2014, the 

Secretaries shall prepare and brief the appropriate congressional 

committees with a detailed programs plan for the oversight and 

execution of the interoperable electronic health records with an 

integrated display of data, or a single electronic health record, 

established under subsection (b). This briefing and supporting documentation shall include— 

(1) programs objectives; 

(2) organization; 

(3) responsibilities of the Departments; 

(4) technical objectives and design principles; 

(5) milestones, including a schedule for the development, 

acquisition, or industry competitions for capabilities needed 

to satisfy the technical system requirements; 

(6) data standards being adopted by the programs; 

(7) outcome-based metrics proposed to measure the 

performance and effectiveness of the programs; and 

(8) the level of funding for fiscal years 2014 through 2017. 

(e) LIMITATION ON FUNDS.—Not more than 25 percent of the 

amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise 

made available for development, procurement, modernization, or 

enhancement of the interoperable electronic health records with 

an integrated display of data, or a single electronic health record, 

established under subsection (b) for the Department of Defense 

or the Department of Veterans Affairs may be obligated or expended 

until the date on which the Secretaries brief the appropriate 

congressional committees of the programs plan under subsection 

(d). 

(f) REPORTING.— 

(1) QUARTERLY REPORTING.—On a quarterly basis, the Secretaries shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a detailed financial summary. 

(2) NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of Defense and Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees written notification prior to obligating funds 

for any contract or task order for electronic health record system 

modernization efforts that is in excess of $5,000,000. 

(g) REQUIREMENTS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than October 1, 2014, all health 

care data contained in the Department of Defense AHLTA 

and the Department of Veterans Affairs VistA systems shall 
H. R. 3304—126 

be computable in real time and comply with the existing 

national data standards and have a process in place to ensure 

data is standardized as national standards continue to evolve. 

On a quarterly basis, the Secretaries shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees updates on the progress of 

data sharing. 

(2) CERTIFICATION.—At such time as the operational capability described in subsection (b)(1) is achieved, the Secretaries 

shall jointly certify to the appropriate congressional committees 

that the Secretaries have complied with such data standards 

described in paragraph (1). 

(3) RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL.—The Secretaries shall each 

identify a senior official to be responsible for the modern platforms supporting an interoperable electronic health record with 

an integrated display of data, or a single electronic health 

record, established under subsection (b). The Secretaries shall 

also each identify a senior official to be responsible for modernizing the electronic health record software of the respective 

Department. Such official shall have included within their 

performance evaluation performance metrics related to the 

execution of the responsibilities under this paragraph. Not later 

than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

each Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional 

committees the name of each senior official selected under 

this paragraph. 

(4) COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESSMENT.—If both Secretaries do not meet the requirements under paragraph (1), the 

Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the 

appropriate congressional committees an assessment of the 

performance of the compliance of both Secretaries of such 

requirements. 

(h) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.— 

(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 60 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries shall jointly establish an executive committee to support the development and 

validation of adopted standards, required architectural platforms and structure, and the capacity to enforce such standards, 

platforms, and structure as the Secretaries execute requirements and develop programmatic assessment as needed by 

the Secretaries to ensure interoperable electronic health records 

with an integrated display of data, or a single electronic health 

record, are established pursuant to the requirements of subsection (b). The Executive Committee shall annually certify 

to the appropriate congressional committees that such record 

meets the definition of ‘‘integrated’’ as specified in subsection 

(k)(4). 

(2) MEMBERSHIP.—The Executive Committee established 

under paragraph (1) shall consist of not more than 6 members, 

appointed by the Secretaries as follows: 

(A) Two co-chairs, one appointed by each of the Secretaries. 

(B) One member from the technical community of the 

Department of Defense appointed by the Secretary of 

Defense. 

(C) One member from the technical community of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs appointed by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs. 
H. R. 3304—127 

(D) One member from the clinical community of the 

Department of Defense appointed by the Secretary of 

Defense. 

(E) One member from the clinical community of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs appointed by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs. 

(3) REPORTING.—Not later than June 1, 2014, and on a 

quarterly basis thereafter, the Executive Committee shall 

submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report 

on the activities of the Committee. 

(i) INDEPENDENT REVIEW.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

request the Defense Science Board to conduct an annual review 

of the progress of the Secretary toward achieving the requirements 

in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b). The Defense Science 

Board shall submit to the Secretary a report of the findings of 

the review. Not later than 30 days after receiving the report, 

the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees the report with any comments considered appropriate by the 

Secretary. 

(j) DEADLINE FOR COMPLETION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE

HEALTHCARE ARTIFACT AND IMAGE MANAGEMENT SOLUTION PROGRAM.— 

(1) DEADLINE.—The Secretary of Defense shall complete 

the implementation of the Healthcare Artifact and Image 

Management Solution program of the Department of Defense 

by not later than the date that is 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act. 

(2) REPORT.—Upon completion of the implementation of 

the Healthcare Artifact and Image Management Solution program, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report describing the extent of the interoperability between the Healthcare Artifact and Image Management Solution program and the Veterans Benefits Management 

System of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

(k) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term 

‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means— 

(A) the congressional defense committees; and 

(B) the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate 

and the House of Representatives. 

(2) GENERATION 3.—The term ‘‘generation 3’’ means, with 

respect to an electronic health system, a system that has the 

technical capability to bring evidence-based medicine to the 

point of care and provide functionality for multiple care venues. 

(3) INTEROPERABLE.—The term ‘‘interoperable’’ refers to the 

ability of different electronic health records systems or software 

to meaningfully exchange information in real time and provide 

useful results to one or more systems. 

(4) INTEGRATED.—The term ‘‘integrated’’ refers to the 

integration of health data from the Department of Defense 

and the Department of Veterans Affairs and outside providers 

to provide clinicians with a comprehensive medical record that 

allows data existing on disparate systems to be shared or 

accessed across functional or system boundaries in order to 

make the most informed decisions when treating patients. 
H. R. 3304—128 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 

SEC. 721. DISPLAY OF BUDGET INFORMATION FOR EMBEDDED 

MENTAL HEALTH PROVIDERS OF THE RESERVE COMPONENTS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by adding after section 236, as added by section 141 

of this Act, the following new section: 

‘‘§ 237. Embedded mental health providers of the reserve 

components: display of budget information 

‘‘The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress, as a part 

of the documentation that supports the President’s annual budget 

for the Department of Defense, a budget justification display with 

respect to embedded mental health providers within each reserve 

component, including the amount requested for each such component.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following 

new item: 

‘‘237. Embedded mental health providers of the reserve components: display of budget information.’’. 

SEC. 722. REPORT ON ROLE OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

IN CERTAIN CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE. 

(a) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit 

to the appropriate congressional committees a report on covered 

centers of excellence. Such report shall include the following with 

respect to each covered center of excellence: 

(1) The amount of resources obligated by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs in support of the center beginning on the 

date on which the center was established, including the amount 

of funds, personnel, time, and functions provided in support 

of the center. 

(2) An estimate of the amount of resources the Secretary 

plans to dedicate to the center during each of fiscal years 

2014 through 2018. 

(3) A description of the role of the Secretary. 

(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means 

the following: 

(A) The Committees on Armed Services and Veterans’ 

Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

(B) The Committees on Armed Services and Veterans’ 

Affairs of the Senate. 

(2) The term ‘‘covered centers of excellence’’ means the 

following: 

(A) The centers established under sections 1621, 1622, 

and 1623 of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public 

Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note). 

(B) The center established under section 721 of the 

Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 1071 

note). 
H. R. 3304—129 

(C) The center established under section 723 of such 

Act (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4508). 

SEC. 723. REPORT ON MEMORANDUM REGARDING TRAUMATIC BRAIN 

INJURIES. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 

this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 

defense committees a report on how the Secretary identifies, refers, 

and treats traumatic brain injuries with respect to members of 

the Armed Forces who served in Operation Enduring Freedom 

or Operation Iraqi Freedom before the effective date in June 2010 

of directive type memorandum 09–033 titled ‘‘Policy Guidance for 

Management of Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the 

Deployed Setting’’, regarding using a 50-meter distance from an 

explosion as a criterion to properly identify, refer, and treat members for potential traumatic brain injury. 

SEC. 724. REPORT ON PROVISION OF ADVANCED PROSTHETICS AND 

ORTHOTICS TO MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND 

VETERANS. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to the appropriate 

committees of Congress a report on the plans of the Department 

of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs, respectively, 

to ensure that the most clinically appropriate prosthetics and 

orthotics are made available to injured members of the Armed 

Forces and veterans using technological advances as appropriate. 

Such report shall include a description of the processes of each 

Secretary with respect to coordinating and identifying care in the 

Department of Veterans Affairs for an injured member of the Armed 

Forces who, prior to the member being discharged or released 

from the Armed Forces, has an advanced technology prosthetic. 

(b) COVERED PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS.—The prosthetics 

and orthotics to be covered by the report under subsection (a) 

shall include powered prosthetics and orthotics that will enable 

members of the Armed Forces and veterans who have suffered 

amputation and, in the case of orthotics wearers, other injuries 

with limb salvage, to restore functionality to the maximum extent 

practicable. 

(c) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 725. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORTS ON TRICARE RECOVERY 

AUDIT PROGRAM AND AVAILABILITY OF COMPOUNDED 

PHARMACEUTICALS. 

(a) RECOVERY AUDIT PROGRAM.— (1) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the 

United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that evaluates the similarities and differences 

of Medicare and the TRICARE program with respect to identifying and recovering improper payments. 
H. R. 3304—130 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report shall contain an evaluation of 

the following: 

(A) Claims processing efforts of both Medicare and 

the TRICARE program to prevent improper payments by 

denying claims prior to payment. 

(B) Claims processing efforts of both Medicare and 

the TRICARE program to correct improper payments postpayment. 

(C) The effectiveness of post-payment audit programs 

of both Medicare and the TRICARE program to identify 

and correct improper payments that are returned to Medicare or the TRICARE program, respectively. 

(b) COMPOUNDED PHARMACEUTICALS.— 

(1) REPORT.—Not later than September 30, 2014, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report on the availability of compounded pharmaceuticals in the military health care system. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall 

include the following: 

(A) A description of the number of prescriptions for 

compounded pharmaceuticals processed, and the types of 

compounded pharmaceuticals dispensed, during fiscal year 

2013 in pharmacy venues. 

(B) A description of the categories of eligible beneficiaries who received compounded pharmaceuticals in each 

pharmacy venue during fiscal year 2013. 

(C) A description of the claims reimbursement methodology used by the manager of the TRICARE pharmacy 

benefits program to reimburse pharmacy providers for compounded pharmaceuticals, and an assessment of the 

manner in which such methodology compares with 

reimbursement methodologies used by other health programs of the Federal Government. 

(D) A review of the existing accreditation standards, 

as of the date of the report, intended to assure the safety 

and efficacy of compounded pharmaceuticals available 

through the military health care system. 

(3) PHARMACY VENUE DEFINED.—In this subsection, the 

term ‘‘pharmacy venue’’ means facilities of the uniformed services, retail pharmacies, and the national mail-order pharmacy 

program, as described in section 1074g(a)(2)(E) of title 10, 

United States Code. 

TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED MATTERS 

Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management 

Sec. 801. Enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department of Defense laboratories. 

Sec. 802. Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available for contract 

services. 

Sec. 803. Identification and replacement of obsolete electronic parts. 
H. R. 3304—131 

Subtitle B—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and 

Limitations 

Sec. 811. Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for contractor compensation. 

Sec. 812. Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in certain reports. 

Sec. 813. Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving suspension or debarment. 

Sec. 814. Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military purpose nondevelopmental items. 

Subtitle C—Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition Programs 

Sec. 821. Synchronization of cryptographic systems for major defense acquisition 

programs. 

Sec. 822. Assessment of dedicated ground control system before Milestone B approval of major defense acquisition programs constituting a space program. 

Sec. 823. Additional responsibility for product support managers for major weapon 

systems. 

Sec. 824. Comptroller General review of Department of Defense processes for the 

acquisition of weapon systems. 

Subtitle D—Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency Operations 

in Iraq or Afghanistan 

Sec. 831. Prohibition on contracting with the enemy. 

Sec. 832. Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan. 

Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and 

Management 

SEC. 801. ENHANCED TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPED AT 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LABORATORIES. 

(a) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘military department’’ has the meaning provided in section 101 of title 10, United States Code. 

(2) The term ‘‘DOD laboratory’’ or ‘‘laboratory’’ means any 

facility or group of facilities that— 

(A) is owned, leased, operated, or otherwise used by 

the Department of Defense; and 

(B) meets the definition of ‘‘laboratory’’ as provided 

in subsection (d)(2) of section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler 

Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a). 

(b) AUTHORITY.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of a military department each may authorize the heads 

of DOD laboratories to grant nonexclusive, exclusive, or partially exclusive licenses, royalty free or for royalties or for 

rights to other intellectual property, for computer software and 

its related documentation developed at a DOD laboratory, but 

only if— 

(A) the computer software and related documentation 

would be a trade secret under the meaning of section 

552(b)(4) of title 5, United States Code, if the information 

had been obtained from a non-Federal party; 

(B) the public is notified of the availability of the 

software and related documentation for licensing and 

interested parties have a fair opportunity to submit applications for licensing; 
H. R. 3304—132 

(C) such licensing activities and licenses comply with 

the requirements under section 209 of title 35, United 

States Code; and 

(D) the software originally was developed to meet the 

military needs of the Department of Defense. 

(2) PROTECTIONS AGAINST UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE.— 

The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of a military department each shall provide appropriate precautions against the 

unauthorized disclosure of any computer software or documentation covered by paragraph (1)(A), including exemption 

from section 552 of title 5, United States Code, for a period 

of up to 5 years after the development of the computer software 

by the DOD laboratory. 

(c) ROYALTIES.— 

(1) USE OF ROYALTIES.—Except as provided in paragraph 

(2), any royalties or other payments received by the Department 

of Defense or a military department from licensing computer 

software or documentation under paragraph (b)(1) shall be 

retained by the Department of Defense or the military department and shall be disposed of as follows: 

(A)(i) The Department of Defense or the military 

department shall pay each year the first $2,000, and thereafter at least 15 percent, of the royalties or other payments, 

to be divided among the employees who developed the 

computer software. 

(ii) The Department of Defense or the military department may provide appropriate lesser incentives, from the 

royalties or other payments, to laboratory employees who 

are not developers of such computer software but who 

substantially increased the technical value of the software. 

(iii) The Department of Defense or the military department shall retain the royalties and other payments received 

until it makes payments to employees of a DOD laboratory 

under clause (i) or (ii). 

(iv) The Department of Defense or the military department may retain an amount reasonably necessary to pay 

expenses incidental to the administration and distribution 

of royalties or other payments under this section by an 

organizational unit of the Department of Defense or military department other than its laboratories. 

(B) The balance of the royalties or other payments shall 

be transferred by the Department of Defense or the military 

department to its laboratories, with the majority share of the 

royalties or other payments going to the laboratory where the 

development occurred. The royalties or other payments so transferred to any DOD laboratory may be used or obligated by 

that laboratory during the fiscal year in which they are received 

or during the 2 succeeding fiscal years— 

(i) to reward scientific, engineering, and technical 

employees of the DOD laboratory, including developers of 

sensitive or classified technology, regardless of whether 

the technology has commercial applications; 

(ii) to further scientific exchange among the laboratories of the agency; 

(iii) for education and training of employees consistent 

with the research and development missions and objectives 

of the Department of Defense, military department, or DOD 
H. R. 3304—133 

laboratory, and for other activities that increase the potential for transfer of the technology of the DOD laboratory; 

(iv) for payment of expenses incidental to the administration and licensing of computer software or other intellectual property made at the DOD laboratory, including the 

fees or other costs for the services of other agencies, persons, or organizations for intellectual property management 

and licensing services; or 

(v) for scientific research and development consistent 

with the research and development missions and objectives 

of the DOD laboratory. 

(C) All royalties or other payments retained by the Department of Defense, military department, or DOD laboratory after 

payments have been made pursuant to subparagraphs (A) and 

(B) that are unobligated and unexpended at the end of the 

second fiscal year succeeding the fiscal year in which the royalties and other payments were received shall be paid into the 

Treasury of the United States. 

(2) EXCEPTION.—If, after payments under paragraph (1)(A), 

the balance of the royalties or other payments received by 

the Department of Defense or the military department in any 

fiscal year exceed 5 percent of the funds received for use by 

the DOD laboratory for research, development, engineering, 

testing, and evaluation or other related administrative, processing, or value-added activities for that year, 75 percent of 

such excess shall be paid to the Treasury of the United States 

and the remaining 25 percent may be used or obligated under 

paragraph (1)(B). Any funds not so used or obligated shall 

be paid into the Treasury of the United States. 

(3) STATUS OF PAYMENTS TO EMPLOYEES.—Any payment 

made to an employee under this section shall be in addition 

to the regular pay of the employee and to any other awards 

made to the employee, and shall not affect the entitlement 

of the employee to any regular pay, annuity, or award to 

which the employee is otherwise entitled or for which the 

employee is otherwise eligible or limit the amount thereof 

except that the monetary value of an award for the same 

project or effort shall be deducted from the amount otherwise 

available under this paragraph. Payments, determined under 

the terms of this paragraph and made to an employee developer 

as such, may continue after the developer leaves the DOD 

laboratory or the Department of Defense or military department. Payments made under this section shall not exceed 

$75,000 per year to any one person, unless the President 

approves a larger award (with the excess over $75,000 being 

treated as a Presidential award under section 4504 of title 

5, United States Code). 

(d) INFORMATION IN REPORT.—The report required by section 

2515(d) of title 10, United States Code, shall include information 

regarding the implementation and effectiveness of this section. 

(e) EXPIRATION.—The authority provided in this section shall 

expire on December 31, 2017. 

SEC. 802. EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ON AGGREGATE ANNUAL 

AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR CONTRACT SERVICES. 

Section 808 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1489) is amended— 
H. R. 3304—134 

(1) in subsections (a) and (b), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2012 

or 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2012, 2013, or 2014’’; 

(2) in subsection (c)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘during fiscal years 2012 and 2013’’ 

in the matter preceding paragraph (1); 

(B) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as paragraphs (1), (2), 

and (3), respectively; and 

(C) in paragraph (3), as so redesignated, by striking 

‘‘fiscal years 2012 and 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 

2012, 2013, and 2014’’; 

(3) in subsection (d)(4), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2012 or 

2013’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2012, 2013, or 2014’’; and 

(4) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) CARRYOVER OF REDUCTIONS REQUIRED.—If the reductions 

required by subsection (c)(2) for fiscal years 2012 and 2013 are 

not implemented, the amounts remaining for those reductions in 

fiscal years 2012 and 2013 shall be implemented in fiscal year 

2014.’’. 

SEC. 803. IDENTIFICATION AND REPLACEMENT OF OBSOLETE ELECTRONIC PARTS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall implement 

a process for the expedited identification and replacement of obsolete electronic parts included in acquisition programs of the Department of Defense. 

(b) ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED.—At a minimum, the expedited 

process established pursuant to subsection (a) shall— 

(1) include a mechanism pursuant to which contractors, 

or other sources of supply, may provide to appropriate Department of Defense officials information that identifies— 

(A) obsolete electronic parts that are included in the 

specifications for an acquisition program of the Department 

of Defense; and 

(B) suitable replacements for such electronic parts; 

(2) specify timelines for the expedited review and validation 

of information submitted by contractors, or other sources of 

supply, pursuant to paragraph (1); 

(3) specify procedures and timelines for the rapid submission and approval of engineering change proposals needed to 

accomplish the substitution of replacement parts that have 

been validated pursuant to paragraph (2); 

(4) provide for any incentives for contractor participation 

in the expedited process that the Secretary may determine 

to be appropriate; and 

(5) provide that, in addition to the responsibilities under 

section 2337 of title 10, United States Code, a product support 

manager for a major weapon system shall work to identify 

obsolete electronic parts that are included in the specifications 

for an aquisition program of the Department of Defense and 

approve suitable replacements for such electronic parts. 

(c) ADDITIONAL MATTERS.—For the purposes of this section— 

(1) an electronic part is obsolete if— 

(A) the part is no longer in production; and 

(B) the original manufacturer of the part and its 

authorized dealers do not have sufficient parts in stock 
H. R. 3304—135 

to meet the requirements of such an acquisition program; 

and 

(2) an electronic part is a suitable replacement for an 

obsolete electronic part if— 

(A) the part could be substituted for an obsolete part 

without incurring unreasonable expense and without 

degrading system performance; and 

(B) the part is or will be available in sufficient quantity 

to meet the requirements of such an acquisition program. 

Subtitle B—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and 

Limitations 

SEC. 811. GOVERNMENT-WIDE LIMITATIONS ON ALLOWABLE COSTS 

FOR CONTRACTOR COMPENSATION. 

(a) AMENDMENT RELATING TO CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES UNDER

DEFENSE CONTRACTS.—Subparagraph (P) of section 2324(e)(1) of 

title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(P) Costs of compensation of any contractor employee for 

a fiscal year, regardless of the contract funding source, to 

the extent that such compensation exceeds $625,000 adjusted 

annually for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment 

Cost Index for total compensation for private industry workers, 

by occupational and industry group not seasonally adjusted, 

except that the Secretary of Defense may establish exceptions 

for positions in the science, technology, engineering, mathematics, medical, and cybersecurity fields and other fields 

requiring unique areas of expertise upon a determination that 

such exceptions are needed to ensure that the Department 

of Defense has continued access to needed skills and capabilities.’’. 

(b) AMENDMENT RELATING TO CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES UNDER

CIVILIAN AGENCY CONTRACTS.—Paragraph (16) of section 4304(a) 

of title 41, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(16) Costs of compensation of any contractor employee 

for a fiscal year, regardless of the contract funding source, 

to the extent that such compensation exceeds $625,000 adjusted 

annually for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment 

Cost Index for total compensation for private industry workers, 

by occupational and industry group not seasonally adjusted, 

except that the executive agency may establish exceptions for 

positions in the science, technology, engineering, mathematics, 

medical, and cybersecurity fields and other fields requiring 

unique areas of expertise upon a determination that such exceptions are needed to ensure that the executive agency has continued access to needed skills and capabilities.’’. 

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Chapter 11 of title 41, United 

States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking section 1127; and 

(2) by striking the item relating to that section in the 

table of sections at the beginning of such chapter. 

(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

shall apply with respect to costs of compensation incurred under 
H. R. 3304—136 

contracts entered into on or after the date that is 180 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 812. INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL COST ESTIMATE INFORMATION 

IN CERTAIN REPORTS. 

(a) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED IN

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORTS.—Section 2432(c)(1) of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D) as 

subparagraphs (E), (F), and (G), respectively; 

(2) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new 

subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D): 

‘‘(B) for each major defense acquisition program or designated major subprogram included in the report— 

‘‘(i) the Baseline Estimate (as that term is defined 

in section 2433(a)(2) of this title), along with the associated 

risk and sensitivity analysis of that estimate; 

‘‘(ii) the original Baseline Estimate (as that term is 

defined in section 2435(d)(1) of this title), along with the 

associated risk and sensitivity analysis of that estimate; 

‘‘(iii) if the original Baseline Estimate was adjusted 

or revised pursuant to section 2435(d)(2) of this title, such 

adjusted or revised estimate, along with the associated 

risk and sensitivity analysis of that estimate; and 

‘‘(iv) the primary risk parameters associated with the 

current procurement cost for the program (as that term 

is used in section 2432(e)(4) of this title); 

‘‘(C) a summary of the history of significant developments 

from the date each major defense acquisition program or designated major subprogram included in the report was first 

included in a Selected Acquisition Report and program highlights since the last Selected Acquisition Report; 

‘‘(D) the significant schedule and technical risks for each 

such program or subprogram, identified at each major milestone 

and as of the quarter for which the current report is submitted;’’; 

(3) in subparagraph (E), as so redesignated— 

(A) by striking ‘‘major defense acquisition program or 

designated major subprogram’’ and inserting ‘‘such program 

or subprogram’’; 

(B) by inserting ‘‘program acquisition cost and’’ after 

‘‘current’’; 

(C) by striking ‘‘that cost’’ and inserting ‘‘those costs’’; 

and 

(D) by striking ‘‘date the program or subprogram was 

first included in a Selected Acquisition Report’’ and 

inserting ‘‘December 2001 reporting period’’; and 

(4) in subparagraph (F), as so redesignated— 

(A) by striking ‘‘major defense acquisition program or 

designated major subprogram’’ and inserting ‘‘such program 

or subprogram’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘date the program or subprogram was 

first included in a Selected Acquisition Report’’ and 

inserting ‘‘December 2001 reporting period’’. 

(b) PHASE-IN OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS.— 

Section 2432(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, as amended 
H. R. 3304—137 

by subsection (a), shall apply to Selected Acquisition Reports after 

the date of the enactment of this Act as follows: 

(1) For the December 2014 reporting period, to Selected 

Acquisition Reports for five major defense acquisition programs 

or designated major subprograms, as determined by the Secretary. 

(2) For the December 2019 reporting period and each 

reporting period thereafter, to Selected Acquisition Reports for 

all major defense acquisition programs or designated major 

subprograms. 

(c) ADDITIONAL DUTIES OF DIRECTOR OF COST ASSESSMENT AND

PROGRAM EVALUATION WITH RESPECT TO SELECTED ACQUISITION

REPORTS.— 

(1) REVIEW REQUIRED.—Section 2334(a) of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (6); 

(B) by striking the period and inserting ‘‘; and’’ at 

the end of paragraph (7); and 

(C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph 

(8): 

‘‘(8) annually review the cost and associated information 

required to be included, by section 2432(c)(1) of this title, in 

the Selected Acquisition Reports required by that section.’’. 

(2) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ANNUAL

REPORT.—Section 2334(f)(1) of such title is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘report, an assessment of—’’ and 

inserting ‘‘report—’’; 

(B) in each of subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), by 

inserting ‘‘an assessment of’’ before the first word of the 

text; 

(C) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(D) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at 

the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(E) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(D) a summary of the cost and associated information 

reviewed under subsection (a)(8), an identification of any trends 

in that information, an aggregation of the cumulative risk 

of the portfolio of systems reviewed under that subsection, 

and recommendations for improving cost estimates on the basis 

of the review under that subsection.’’. 

SEC. 813. AMENDMENT RELATING TO COMPELLING REASONS FOR 

WAIVING SUSPENSION OR DEBARMENT. 

Section 2393(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

in the second sentence by striking ‘‘in a file available for public 

inspection’’ and inserting ‘‘on a publicly accessible website to the 

maximum extent practicable’’. 

SEC. 814. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM ON ACQUISITION OF MILITARY PURPOSE NONDEVELOPMENTAL ITEMS. 

Section 866(f)(1) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4296; 

10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking ‘‘the date that is 

five years after the date of the enactment of this Act.’’ and inserting 

‘‘December 31, 2019.’’. 
H. R. 3304—138 

Subtitle C—Provisions Relating to Major 

Defense Acquisition Programs 

SEC. 821. SYNCHRONIZATION OF CRYPTOGRAPHIC SYSTEMS FOR 

MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2366b(a)(3) of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) by redesignating subparagraph (G) as subparagraph 

(H); and 

(3) by inserting after subparagraph (F) the following new 

subparagraph (G): 

‘‘(G) there is a plan to mitigate and account for any 

costs in connection with any anticipated de-certification 

of cryptographic systems and components during the 

production and procurement of the major defense acquisition program to be acquired; and’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection 

(a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

and shall apply with respect to major defense acquisition programs 

which are subject to Milestone B approval on or after the date 

occurring six months after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 822. ASSESSMENT OF DEDICATED GROUND CONTROL SYSTEM 

BEFORE MILESTONE B APPROVAL OF MAJOR DEFENSE 

ACQUISITION PROGRAMS CONSTITUTING A SPACE PROGRAM. 

(a) COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS REQUIRED.—Section 2366b(a) of 

title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end 

and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(4) in the case of a space system, performs a cost benefit 

analysis for any new or follow-on satellite system using a 

dedicated ground control system instead of a shared ground 

control system, except that no cost benefit analysis is required 

to be performed under this paragraph for any Milestone B 

approval of a space system after December 31, 2019.’’. 

(b) REQUIREMENT FOR PLAN AND BRIEFING.—Not later than 

one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

of Defense shall— 

(1) develop a Department of Defense-wide long-term plan 

for satellite ground control systems, including the Department’s 

Air Force Satellite Control Network; and 

(2) brief the congressional defense committees on such plan. 

SEC. 823. ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR PRODUCT SUPPORT MANAGERS FOR MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS. 

Section 2337(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (G), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in subparagraph (H), by striking the period at the 

end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(I) ensure that product support arrangements for the 

weapon system describe how such arrangements will 
H. R. 3304—139 

ensure efficient procurement, management, and allocation 

of Government-owned parts inventories in order to prevent 

unnecessary procurements of such parts.’’. 

SEC. 824. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE PROCESSES FOR THE ACQUISITION OF WEAPON 

SYSTEMS. 

(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Comptroller General of the United 

States shall carry out a comprehensive review of the processes 

and procedures of the Department of Defense for the acquisition 

of weapon systems. 

(b) OBJECTIVE OF REVIEW.—The objective of the review required 

by subsection (a) shall be to identify processes and procedures 

for the acquisition of weapon systems that provide little or no 

value added or for which any value added is outweighed by cost 

or schedule delays without adding commensurate value. 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than January 31, 2015, the Comptroller 

General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a 

report on the results of the review required by subsection (a) and 

based on the objective set forth in subsection (b). The report shall 

include, at a minimum, the following: 

(1) A statement of any processes, procedures, organizations, 

or layers of review that are recommended by the Comptroller 

General for modification or elimination, including the rationale 

for the modification or elimination recommended based on the 

objective set forth in subsection (b). 

(2) Such other findings and recommendations, including 

recommendations for legislative or administrative action, as 

the Comptroller General considers appropriate in light of the 

review required by subsection (a) and the objective set forth 

in subsection (b). 

Subtitle D—Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan 

SEC. 831. PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING WITH THE ENEMY. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO TERMINATE OR VOID CONTRACTS, GRANTS, 

AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS AND TO RESTRICT FUTURE

AWARD.— 

(1) IDENTIFICATION OF PERSONS AND ENTITIES.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish in each covered combatant 

command a program to identify persons or entities, within 

the area of responsibility of such covered combatant command, 

that— 

(A) provide funds received under a contract, grant, 

or cooperative agreement of the Department of Defense 

directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity; or 

(B) fail to exercise due diligence to ensure that none 

of the funds received under a contract, grant, or cooperative 

agreement of the Department of Defense are provided 

directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity. 

(2) NOTICE OF PERSONS OR ENTITIES IDENTIFIED.—Upon 

the identification of a person or entity as meeting subparagraph 

(A) or (B) of paragraph (1), the commander of the combatant 
H. R. 3304—140 

command concerned, and any deputies of the commander specified by the commander for purposes of this section, shall be 

notified in writing of such identification of such person or 

entity. 

(3) RESPONSIVE ACTIONS.—Upon receipt of a notice under 

paragraph (2), the commander of the combatant command concerned may, in consultation with the Under Secretary of 

Defense for Policy, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, and the appropriate Chief of 

Mission, notify the heads of appropriate contracting activities, 

in writing, of such identification and request that the heads 

of such contracting activities exercise the authorities provided 

pursuant to paragraph (4) and the Department of Defense 

Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation, as revised, 

with respect to any contract, grant, or cooperative agreement 

that provides funding directly or indirectly to the person or 

entity covered by the notice. 

(4) AUTHORITIES.—Not later than 30 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

revise the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal 

Acquisition Regulation to authorize the head of a contracting 

activity in each covered combatant command, pursuant to a 

request from the commander of a covered combatant command 

under paragraph (3)— 

(A) to prohibit, limit, or otherwise place restrictions 

on the award of any Department of Defense contract, grant, 

or cooperative agreement to a person or entity identified 

pursuant to paragraph (1)(A); 

(B) to terminate for default any Department contract, 

grant, or cooperative agreement awarded to a person or 

entity identified pursuant to paragraph (1)(B); or 

(C) to void in whole or in part any Department contract, 

grant, or cooperative agreement awarded to a person or 

entity identified pursuant to paragraph (1)(A). 

(b) CONTRACT CLAUSE.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be revised 

to require that— 

(A) the clause described in paragraph (2) shall be 

included in each covered contract, grant, and cooperative 

agreement of the Department of Defense that is awarded 

on or after the date of the enactment of this Act; and 

(B) to the maximum extent practicable, each covered 

contract, grant, and cooperative agreement of the Department of Defense that is awarded before the date of the 

enactment of this Act shall be modified to include the 

clause described in paragraph (2). 

(2) CLAUSE DESCRIBED.—The clause described in this paragraph is a clause that— 

(A) requires the contractor, or the recipient of the 

grant or cooperative agreement, to exercise due diligence 

to ensure that none of the funds received under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement are provided directly 

or indirectly to a covered person or entity; and 

(B) notifies the contractor, or the recipient of the grant 

or cooperative agreement, of the authority of the head 
H. R. 3304—141 

of the contracting activity to terminate or void the contract, 

grant, or cooperative agreement, in whole or in part. 

(3) COVERED CONTRACT, GRANT, OR COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘covered contract, grant, 

or cooperative agreement’’ means a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement with an estimated value in excess of $50,000. 

(4) TREATMENT AS VOID.—For purposes of subsection (a)(4) 

and the exercise under subsection (a)(3) of the authorities in 

the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation pursuant to this subsection: 

(A) A contract, grant, or cooperative agreement that 

is void is unenforceable as contrary to public policy. 

(B) A contract, grant, or cooperative agreement that 

is void in part is unenforceable as contrary to public policy 

with regard to a segregable task or effort under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement. 

(c) REQUIREMENTS FOLLOWING CONTRACT ACTIONS.—Not later 

than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition 

Regulation shall be revised as follows: 

(1) To require that any head of contracting activity taking 

an action pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4) to terminate, 

void, or restrict a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement 

notify in writing the contractor or recipient of the grant or 

cooperative agreement, as applicable, of the action. 

(2) To permit, in such manner as the Department of 

Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation as 

so revised shall provide, the contractor or recipient of a grant 

or cooperative agreement subject to an action taken pursuant 

to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4) to terminate or void the contract, 

grant, or cooperative agreement, as the case may be, an opportunity to challenge the action by requesting administrative 

review within 30 days after receipt of notice of the action. 

(d) ANNUAL REVIEW.—The commanders of the covered combatant commands shall, on an annual basis, review the lists of persons 

and entities previously identified pursuant to subsection (a)(1) in 

order to determine whether or not such persons and entities continue to warrant identification pursuant to that subsection. If a 

commander determines pursuant to such a review that a person 

or entity no longer warrants identification pursuant to subsection 

(a)(1), the commander shall notify the heads of contracting activities 

of the Department of Defense in writing of such determination. 

(e) PROTECTION OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.—Classified 

information relied upon to make an identification pursuant to subsection (a)(1) may not be disclosed to a contractor or a recipient 

of a grant or cooperative agreement with respect to which an 

action is taken pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4) or to their 

representatives, in the absence of a protective order issued by 

a court of competent jurisdiction established under Article I or 

Article III of the Constitution of the United States that specifically 

addresses the conditions upon which such classified information 

may be so disclosed. 

(f) DELEGATION.— 

(1) RESPONSIBILITIES RELATING TO IDENTIFICATION AND

REVIEW.—The commander of a covered combatant command 

may delegate the responsibilities in subsection (a)(3) to any 
H. R. 3304—142 

deputies of the commander specified by the commander pursuant to that subsection. The commander may delegate any 

responsibilities under subsection (d) to the deputy commander 

of the combatant command. Any delegation of responsibilities 

under this paragraph shall be made in writing. 

(2) NONDELEGATION OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTRACT

ACTIONS.—The authority provided by subsections (a)(3) and 

(a)(4) to terminate, void, or restrict contracts, grants, and 

cooperative agreements may not be delegated below the level 

of head of contracting activity. 

(g) INCLUSION OF INFORMATION ON CONTRACT ACTIONS IN

FAPIIS.—Upon the termination, voiding, or restriction of a contract, 

grant, or cooperative agreement pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or 

(a)(4), the head of contracting activity concerned shall provide for 

the inclusion in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity 

Information System (FAPIIS), or other formal system of records 

on contractors or entities, of appropriate information on the termination, voiding, or restriction of the contract, grant, or cooperative 

agreement. 

(h) REPORTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1 each year through 

2019, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 

defense committees a report on the use of the authorities in 

this section in the preceding calendar year, including the following: 

(A) For each instance in which a contract, grant, or 

cooperative agreement was terminated or voided, or entry 

into contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements was 

restricted, pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4), the following: 

(i) An explanation of the basis for the action taken. 

(ii) The value of the contract, grant, or cooperative 

agreement terminated or voided. 

(iii) The value of all contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements of the Department of Defense in force 

with the person or entity concerned at the time the 

contract, grant, or cooperative agreement was terminated or voided. 

(iv) Information on how the goods or services covered by the terminated or voided contract, grant, or 

cooperative agreement were otherwise obtained by the 

commander of the combatant command concerned. 

(B) For each instance in which a contract, grant, or 

cooperative agreement of a person or entity identified 

pursuant to subsection (a)(1) was not terminated or voided 

pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4), or the future award 

of contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements to such 

person or entity was not restricted pursuant to subsection 

(a)(3) or (a)(4), an explanation why such action was not 

taken. 

(2) FORM.—Any report under this subsection may be submitted in classified form. 

(i) OTHER DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘covered combatant command’’ means United 

States Central Command, United States European Command, 

United States Africa Command, United States Southern Command, or United States Pacific Command. 
H. R. 3304—143 

(2) The term ‘‘head of contracting activity’’ has the meaning 

given that term in subpart 601 of part 1 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation. 

(3) The term ‘‘covered person or entity’’ means a person 

or entity that is actively opposing United States or coalition 

forces involved in a contingency operation in which members 

of the armed forces are actively engaged in hostilities. 

(j) SUNSET.—The provisions of this section shall cease to be 

effective on December 31, 2018. 

SEC. 832. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE PRODUCTS AND 

SERVICES PRODUCED IN COUNTRIES ALONG A MAJOR 

ROUTE OF SUPPLY TO AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (f) of section 801 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111– 

84; 123 Stat. 2399), as amended by section 841(a) of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112– 

239; 126 Stat. 1845), is further amended by striking ‘‘December 

31, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2015’’. 

(b) CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (b)(1)(B) of such 

section is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘and the NATO International Security 

Assistance Force’’ and inserting ‘‘or NATO forces’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘to Afghanistan’’ and inserting ‘‘to or from 

Afghanistan’’. 

TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT 

Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management 

Sec. 901. Revisions to composition of transition plan for defense business enterprise 

architecture. 

Sec. 902. Comptroller General report on potential relocation of Federal Government 

tenants onto military installations in the United States. 

Sec. 903. Clarification of authority for the command acquisition executive of the 

United States Special Operations Command. 

Sec. 904. Streamlining of Department of Defense management headquarters. 

Sec. 905. Update of statutory statement of functions of the Chairman of the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff relating to doctrine, training, and education. 

Sec. 906. Modification of reference to major Department of Defense headquarters 

activities instruction. 

Sec. 907. Personnel security. 

Subtitle B—Space Activities 

Sec. 911. National security space satellite reporting policy. 

Sec. 912. National security space defense and protection. 

Sec. 913. Space acquisition strategy. 

Sec. 914. Space control mission report. 

Sec. 915. Responsive launch. 

Sec. 916. Limitation on use of funds for Space Protection Program. 

Sec. 917. Eagle Vision system. 

Subtitle C—Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities 

Sec. 921. Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities. 

Sec. 922. Department of Defense intelligence priorities. 

Sec. 923. Defense Clandestine Service. 

Sec. 924. Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation. 

Subtitle D—Cyberspace-Related Matters 

Sec. 931. Modification of requirement for inventory of Department of Defense tactical data link systems. 
H. R. 3304—144 

Sec. 932. Authorities, capabilities, and oversight of the United States Cyber Command. 

Sec. 933. Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of Defense. 

Sec. 934. Modification of requirement for Report on Department of Defense 

Progress in Defending the Department and the Defense Industrial Base 

from Cyber Events. 

Sec. 935. Additional requirements relating to the software licenses of the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 936. Cyber outreach and threat awareness for small businesses. 

Sec. 937. Joint Federated Centers for Trusted Defense Systems for the Department 

of Defense. 

Sec. 938. Supervision of the acquisition of cloud computing capabilities. 

Sec. 939. Cyber vulnerabilities of Department of Defense weapon systems and tactical communications systems. 

Sec. 940. Control of the proliferation of cyber weapons. 

Sec. 941. Integrated policy to deter adversaries in cyberspace. 

Sec. 942. National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education matters. 

Subtitle E—Total Force Management 

Sec. 951. Reviews of appropriate manpower performance. 

Subtitle A—Department of Defense 

Management 

SEC. 901. REVISIONS TO COMPOSITION OF TRANSITION PLAN FOR 

DEFENSE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE. 

Section 2222(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘defense business enterprise architecture’’ and inserting ‘‘target defense business systems computing environment described in subsection (d)(3)’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘existing as of September 30, 2011 

(known as ‘legacy systems’) that will not be part of the 

defense business enterprise architecture’’ and inserting 

‘‘that will be phased out of the defense business systems 

computing environment within three years after review 

and certification as ‘legacy systems’ by the investment 

management process established under subsection (g)’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘that provides for reducing the use 

of those legacy systems in phases’’; and 

(3) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘legacy systems (referred 

to in subparagraph (B)) that will be a part of the target defense 

business systems computing environment described in subsection (d)(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘existing systems that are part 

of the target defense business systems computing environment’’. 

SEC. 902. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON POTENTIAL RELOCATION OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TENANTS ONTO MILITARY INSTALLATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than one year after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United 

States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 

containing the results of a review of the potential for and obstacles 

to Federal agencies other than the Department of Defense relocating 

onto military installations to save costs or enhance security. At 

a minimum, the Comptroller General shall answer the following 

questions in the report: 

(1) What opportunities exist to permit non-Department of 

Defense Federal agencies to locate operations onto military 
H. R. 3304—145 

installations having excess facilities adequate for the tenant 

agencies’ mission needs? 

(2) What factors would the Department of Defense and 

the potential tenant agencies need to consider in determining 

whether such tenancy would be viable? 

(3) What obstacles exist to the consolidation of non-Department of Defense Federal agencies onto military installations 

having adequate excess capacity? 

(4) What non-Federal organizations are tenants on the 

installations (such as those under the enhanced use leasing 

program)? 

(b) SPECIFIC CONSIDERATION OF INSTALLATIONS THAT SUPPORT

ARCTIC MISSIONS.—The report required under subsection (a) shall 

specifically evaluate the potential for and obstacles to consolidation 

of Federal tenants on installations that support Arctic missions, 

focusing on Federal entities with homeland security, defense, international trade, commerce, and other national security-related functions that are compatible with the missions of the military installations, or can be used to protect national interests in the Arctic 

region. 

SEC. 903. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY FOR THE COMMAND 

ACQUISITION EXECUTIVE OF THE UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND. 

Section 167(e)(4)(C)(ii) of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended by inserting after ‘‘shall be’’ the following: ‘‘responsible 

to the commander for rapidly delivering acquisition solutions to 

meet validated special operations-peculiar requirements, subordinate to the Defense Acquisition Executive in matters of acquisition, 

subject to the same oversight as the service acquisition executives, 

and’’. 

SEC. 904. STREAMLINING OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS. 

(a) PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop 

a plan for streamlining Department of Defense management headquarters by changing or reducing the size of staffs, eliminating 

tiers of management, cutting functions that provide little or no 

added value, and consolidating overlapping and duplicative programs and offices. 

(b) ELEMENTS OF PLAN.—The plan required by subsection (a) 

shall include the following for each covered organization: 

(1) A description of the planned changes or reductions 

in staffing and services provided by military personnel, civilian 

personnel, and contractor personnel. 

(2) A description of the planned changes or reductions 

in management, functions, and programs and offices. 

(3) The estimated cumulative savings to be achieved over 

a 10-fiscal-year period beginning with fiscal year 2015, and 

estimated savings to be achieved for each of fiscal years 2015 

through 2024. 

(c) COVERED ORGANIZATION.—In this section, the term ‘‘covered 

organization’’ includes each of the following: 

(1) The Office of the Secretary of Defense. 

(2) The Joint Staff. 

(3) The Defense Agencies. 

(4) The Department of Defense field activities. 
H. R. 3304—146 

(5) The headquarters of the combatant commands. 

(6) Headquarters, Department of the Army, including the 

Office of the Secretary of the Army, the Office of the Chief 

of Staff of the Army, and the Army Staff. 

(7) The major command headquarters of the Army. 

(8) The Office of the Secretary of the Navy, the Office 

of the Chief of Naval Operations, and Headquarters, United 

States Marine Corps. 

(9) The major command headquarters of the Navy and 

the Marine Corps. 

(10) Headquarters, Department of the Air Force, including 

the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Office of 

the Air Force Chief of Staff, and the Air Staff. 

(11) The major command headquarters of the Air Force. 

(12) The National Guard Bureau. 

(d) REPORTS.— 

(1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees the plan required by 

subsection (a). 

(2) STATUS REPORT.—The Secretary shall include with the 

Department of Defense materials submitted to Congress with 

the budget of the President for each of fiscal years 2016 through 

2024 (as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of 

title 31, United States Code) a report describing the 

implementation of the plan required by subsection (a) during 

the preceding fiscal year and any modifications to the plan 

required due to changing circumstances. Each such report shall 

include the following: 

(A) A summary of savings achieved for each covered 

organization in the fiscal year covered by such report. 

(B) A description of the savings through changes or 

reductions in staffing and services provided by military 

personnel, civilian personnel, and contractor personnel in 

the fiscal year covered by such report. 

(C) A description of the savings through changes or 

reductions in management, functions, and programs and 

offices in the fiscal year covered by such report. 

(D) In any case in which savings under the plan fall 

short of the objective of the plan for the fiscal year covered 

by such report, an explanation of the reasons for the shortfall. 

(E) A description of any modifications to the plan made 

during the fiscal year covered by such report, and an explanation of the reasons for such modifications. 

SEC. 905. UPDATE OF STATUTORY STATEMENT OF FUNCTIONS OF THE 

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF RELATING 

TO DOCTRINE, TRAINING, AND EDUCATION. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (5) of section 153(a) of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘and technical standards, and executing actions,’’ after ‘‘policies’’; 

(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and training’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs: 

‘‘(D) Formulating policies for concept development and 

experimentation for the joint employment of the armed forces. 
H. R. 3304—147 

‘‘(E) Formulating policies for gathering, developing, and 

disseminating joint lessons learned for the armed forces.’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading of such paragraph 

is amended by striking ‘‘DOCTRINE, TRAINING, AND EDUCATION’’ and 

inserting ‘‘JOINT FORCE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES’’. 

SEC. 906. MODIFICATION OF REFERENCE TO MAJOR DEPARTMENT 

OF DEFENSE HEADQUARTERS ACTIVITIES INSTRUCTION. 

Section 194(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘Directive 5100.73’’ and all that follows and inserting 

‘‘Instruction 5100.73, titled ‘Major DoD Headquarters Activities’.’’. 

SEC. 907. PERSONNEL SECURITY. 

(a) COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, 

acting through the Director of Cost Assessment and Program 

Evaluation and in consultation with the Director of the Office 

of Management and Budget, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth a comprehensive analysis 

comparing the quality, cost, and timeliness of personnel security 

clearance investigations and reinvestigations for employees and 

contractor personnel of the Department of Defense that are 

conducted by the Office of Personnel Management with the 

quality, cost, and timeliness of personnel security clearance 

investigations and reinvestigations for such personnel that are 

conducted by components of the Department of Defense. 

(2) ELEMENTS OF ANALYSIS.—The analysis under paragraph 

(1) shall do the following: 

(A) Determine and compare, for each of the Office 

of Personnel Management and the components of the 

Department that conduct personnel security investigations 

as of the date of the analysis, the quality, cost, and timeliness associated with personnel security investigations and 

reinvestigations of each type and level of clearance, and 

identify the elements that contribute to such cost, schedule, 

and performance. 

(B) Identify mechanisms for permanently improving 

the transparency of the cost structure of personnel security 

investigations and reinvestigations. 

(b) PERSONNEL SECURITY FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

EMPLOYEES AND CONTRACTORS.—If the Secretary of Defense determines that the current approach for obtaining personnel security 

investigations and reinvestigations for employees and contractor 

personnel of the Department of Defense is not the most efficient 

and effective approach for the Department, the Secretary shall 

develop a plan, by not later than October 1, 2014, for the transition 

of personnel security investigations and reinvestigations to the 

approach preferred by the Secretary. 

(c) STRATEGY FOR MODERNIZING PERSONNEL SECURITY.— (1) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, 

the Director of National Intelligence, and the Director of the 

Office of Management and Budget shall jointly develop, implement, and provide to the appropriate committees of Congress 

a strategy to modernize all aspects of personnel security for 

the Department of Defense with the objectives of improving 

quality, providing for continuous monitoring, decreasing 
H. R. 3304—148 

unauthorized disclosures of classified information, lowering 

costs, increasing efficiencies, and enabling and encouraging reciprocity. 

(2) CONSIDERATION OF ANALYSIS.—In developing the 

strategy under paragraph (1), the Secretary and the Directors 

shall consider the results of the analysis required by subsection 

(a) and the results of any ongoing reviews of recent unauthorized disclosures of national security information. 

(3) METRICS.— 

(A) METRICS REQUIRED.—In developing the strategy 

required by paragraph (1), the Secretary and the Directors 

shall jointly establish metrics to measure the effectiveness 

of the strategy in meeting the objectives specified in that 

paragraph. 

(B) REPORT.—At the same time the budget of the President for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2019 is submitted 

to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United 

States Code, the Secretary and the Directors shall jointly 

submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report 

on the metrics established under paragraph (1), including 

an assessment using the metrics of the effectiveness of 

the strategy in meeting the objectives specified in paragraph (1). 

(4) ELEMENTS.—In developing the strategy required by 

paragraph (1), the Secretary and the Directors shall address 

issues including but not limited to the following: 

(A) Elimination of manual or inefficient processes in 

investigations and reinvestigations for personnel security, 

wherever practicable, and automating and integrating the 

elements of the investigation and adjudication processes, 

including in the following: 

(i) The clearance application process. 

(ii) Investigation case management. 

(iii) Adjudication case management. 

(iv) Investigation methods for the collection, analysis, storage, retrieval, and transfer of data and records 

from investigative sources and between any case 

management systems. 

(v) Records management for hiring and clearance 

decisions. 

(B) Elimination or reduction, where possible, of the 

use of databases and information sources that cannot be 

accessed and processed automatically electronically, or 

modification of such databases and information sources, 

if appropriate and cost-effective, to enable electronic access 

and processing. 

(C) Access and analysis of government, publically available, and commercial data sources, including social media, 

that provide independent information pertinent to adjudication guidelines and termination standards to improve 

quality and timeliness, and reduce costs, of investigations 

and reinvestigations. 

(D) Use of government-developed and commercial technology for continuous monitoring and evaluation of government and commercial data sources that can identify and 

flag information pertinent to hiring and clearance determinations. 
H. R. 3304—149 

(E) Standardization of forms used for routine reporting 

required of cleared personnel (such as travel, foreign contacts, and financial disclosures) and use of continuous monitoring technology to access databases containing such 

reportable information to independently obtain and analyze 

reportable data and events. 

(F) Establishment of an authoritative central repository 

of personnel security information that is accessible electronically at multiple levels of classification and eliminates 

technical barriers to rapid access to information necessary 

for eligibility determinations and reciprocal recognition 

thereof, including the ability to monitor the status of an 

individual and any events related to the continued eligibility of such individual for employment or clearance during 

intervals between investigations. 

(G) Elimination or reduction of the scope of, or alteration of the schedule for, periodic reinvestigations of cleared 

personnel, when such action is appropriate in light of the 

information provided by continuous monitoring or evaluation technology. 

(H) Electronic integration of personnel security processes and information systems with insider threat detection 

and monitoring systems, and pertinent law enforcement, 

counterintelligence and intelligence information, for threat 

detection and correlation, including those processes and 

systems operated by components of the Department of 

Defense for purposes of local security, workforce management, or other related purposes. 

(5) RISK-BASED MONITORING.—The strategy required by 

paragraph (1) shall— 

(A) include the development of a risk-based approach 

to monitoring and reinvestigation that prioritizes which 

cleared individuals shall be subject to frequent reinvestigations and random checks, such as the personnel with the 

broadest access to classified information or with access 

to the most sensitive classified information, including 

information technology specialists or other individuals with 

such broad access commonly known as ‘‘super users’’; 

(B) ensure that if the system of continuous monitoring 

for all cleared individuals described in paragraph (4)(D) 

is implemented in phases, such system shall be implemented on a priority basis for the individuals prioritized 

under subparagraph (A); and 

(C) ensure that the activities of individuals prioritized 

under subparagraph (A) shall be monitored especially 

closely. 

(d) RECIPROCITY OF CLEARANCES.—The Secretary of Defense 

and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly ensure the 

reciprocity of personnel security clearances among positions 

requiring personnel holding secret, top secret, or sensitive compartmented information clearances, to the maximum extent feasible 

consistent with national security requirements. 

(e) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW.— 

(1) REVIEW REQUIRED.—Not later than 150 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

of the United States shall carry out a review of the personnel 

security process. 
H. R. 3304—150 

(2) OBJECTIVE OF REVIEW.—The objective of the review 

required by paragraph (1) shall be to identify the following: 

(A) Differences between the metrics used by the 

Department of Defense and other departments and agencies that grant security clearances in granting reciprocity 

for security clearances, and the manner in which such 

differences can be harmonized. 

(B) The extent to which existing Federal Investigative 

Standards are relevant, complete, and sufficient for guiding 

agencies and individual investigators as they conduct their 

security clearance background investigations. 

(C) The processes agencies have implemented to ensure 

quality in the security clearance background investigation 

process. 

(D) The extent to which agencies have developed and 

implemented outcome-focused performance measures to 

track the quality of security clearance investigations and 

any insights from these measures. 

(E) The processes agencies have implemented for 

resolving incomplete or subpar investigations, and the 

actions taken against government employees and contractor 

personnel who have demonstrated a consistent failure to 

abide by quality assurance measures. 

(3) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit 

to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the 

results of the review required by paragraph (1). 

(f) TASK FORCE ON RECORDS ACCESS FOR SECURITY CLEARANCE

BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS.— 

(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Suitability and Security Clearance Performance Accountability Council, as established by 

Executive Order No. 13467, shall convene a task force to 

examine the different policies and procedures that determine 

the level of access to public records provided by State and 

local authorities in response to investigative requests by Federal Government employees or contracted employees carrying 

out background investigations to determine an individual’s suitability for access to classified information or secure government 

facilities. 

(2) MEMBERSHIP.—The members of the task force shall 

include, but need not be limited to, the following: 

(A) The Chair of the Suitability and Security Clearance 

Performance and Accountability Council, who shall serve 

as chair of the task force. 

(B) A representative from the Office of Personnel 

Management. 

(C) A representative from the Office of the Director 

of National Intelligence. 

(D) A representative from the Department of Defense 

responsible for administering security clearance background investigations. 

(E) Representatives from Federal law enforcement 

agencies within the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security involved in security clearance 

background investigations. 

(F) Representatives from State and local law enforcement agencies, including— 
H. R. 3304—151 

(i) agencies in rural areas that have limited 

resources and less than 500 officers; and 

(ii) agencies that have more than 1,000 officers 

and significant technological resources. 

(G) A representative from Federal, State, and local 

law enforcement associations involved with security clearance background administrative actions and appeals. 

(H) Representatives from Federal, State, and local 

judicial systems involved in the sharing of records to support security clearance background investigations. 

(3) INITIAL MEETING.—The task force shall convene its initial meeting not later than 45 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(4) DUTIES.—The task force shall do the following: 

(A) Analyze the degree to which State and local 

authorities comply with investigative requests made by 

Federal Government employees or contractor employees 

carrying out background investigations to determine an 

individual’s suitability for access to classified information 

or secure government facilities, including the degree to 

which investigative requests are required but never formally requested. 

(B) Analyze limitations on the access to public records 

provided by State and local authorities in response to investigative requests by Federal Government employees and 

contractor employees described in subparagraph (A), 

including, but not be limited to, limitations relating to 

budget and staffing constraints on State and local authorities, any procedural and legal obstacles impairing Federal 

access to State and local law enforcement records, or inadequate investigative procedural standards for background 

investigators. 

(C) Provide recommendations for improving the degree 

of cooperation and records-sharing between State and local 

authorities and Federal Government employees and contractor employees described in subparagraph (A). 

(5) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the task force shall submit to the 

appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth a 

detailed statement of the findings and conclusions of the task 

force pursuant to this subsection, together with the recommendations of the task force for such legislative or administrative action as the task force considers appropriate. 

(g) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the Committee 

on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence 

of the Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 

of the House of Representatives. 
H. R. 3304—152 

Subtitle B—Space Activities 

SEC. 911. NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE SATELLITE REPORTING POLICY. 

(a) NOTIFICATION OF FOREIGN INTERFERENCE OF NATIONAL

SECURITY SPACE.—Chapter 135 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘§ 2278. Notification of foreign interference of national security space 

‘‘(a) NOTICE REQUIRED.—The Commander of the United States 

Strategic Command shall, with respect to each intentional attempt 

by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a United States 

national security space capability, provide to the appropriate 

congressional committees— 

‘‘(1) not later than 48 hours after the Commander determines that there is reason to believe such attempt occurred, 

notice of such attempt; and 

‘‘(2) not later than 10 days after the date on which the 

Commander determines that there is reason to believe such 

attempt occurred, a notification described in subsection (b) with 

respect to such attempt. 

‘‘(b) NOTIFICATION DESCRIPTION.—A notification described in 

this subsection is a written notification that includes— 

‘‘(1) the name and a brief description of the national security space capability that was impacted by an attempt by a 

foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a United States 

national security space capability; 

‘‘(2) a description of such attempt, including the foreign 

actor, the date and time of such attempt, and any related 

capability outage and the mission impact of such outage; and 

‘‘(3) any other information the Commander considers relevant. 

‘‘(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this section, the term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ 

means— 

‘‘(1) the congressional defense committees; and 

‘‘(2) with respect to a notice or notification related to an 

attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a 

United States national security space capability that is intelligence-related, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.’’. 

(b) TABLE OF SECTIONS AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the 

end the following item: 

‘‘2278. Notification of foreign interference of national security space.’’. 

SEC. 912. NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE DEFENSE AND PROTECTION. 

(a) REVIEW.—The Secretary of Defense and the Director of 

National Intelligence shall jointly enter into an arrangement with 

the National Research Council to respond to the near-term and 

long-term threats to the national security space systems of the 

United States by— 

(1) conducting a review of— 

(A) the range of options available to address such 

threats, in terms of deterring hostile actions, defeating 
H. R. 3304—153 

hostile actions, and surviving hostile actions until such 

actions conclude; 

(B) strategies and plans to counter such threats, 

including resilience, reconstitution, disaggregation, and 

other appropriate concepts; and 

(C) existing and planned architectures, warfighter 

requirements, technology development, systems, workforce, 

or other factors related to addressing such threats; and 

(2) recommending architectures, capabilities, and courses 

of action to address such threats and actions to address the 

affordability, technology risk, and any other potential barriers 

or limiting factors in implementing such courses of action. 

(b) REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the National Research Council 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the 

Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 

Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of 

the Senate a report containing the results of the review conducted pursuant to the arrangement under subsection (a) and 

the recommended courses of action identified pursuant to such 

arrangement. 

(2) FORM.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall 

be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 

annex. 

(c) SPACE PROTECTION STRATEGY.—Section 911(f)(1) of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 

2271 note) is amended by striking ‘‘including each of the matters 

required by subsection (c).’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘including— 

‘‘(A) each of the matters required by subsection (c); 

and 

‘‘(B) a description of how the Department of Defense 

and the intelligence community plan to provide necessary 

national security capabilities, through alternative space, 

airborne, or ground systems, if a foreign actor degrades, 

denies access to, or destroys United States national security 

space capabilities.’’. 

SEC. 913. SPACE ACQUISITION STRATEGY. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) commercial satellite services, particularly communications, are needed to satisfy Department of Defense requirements; 

(2) the Department predominately uses one-year leases 

to obtain commercial satellite services, which are often the 

most expensive and least strategic method to acquire necessary 

commercial satellite services; and 

(3) consistent with the required authorization and appropriations, Congress encourages the Department to pursue a 

variety of methods to reduce cost and meet the necessary military requirements, including multi-year leases and procurement 

of Government-owned payloads on commercial satellites. 

(b) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—The Under Secretary of Defense for 

Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with the 

Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, shall establish a strategy to enable the multi-year procurement of commercial 

satellite services. 
H. R. 3304—154 

(c) BASIS.—The strategy required under subsection (b) shall 

include and be based on— 

(1) an analysis of financial or other benefits to acquiring 

satellite services through multi-year acquisition approaches; 

(2) an analysis of the risks associated with such acquisition 

approaches; 

(3) an identification of methods to address planning, 

programming, budgeting, and execution challenges to such 

approaches, including methods to address potential termination 

liability or cancellation costs generally associated with multiyear contracts; 

(4) an identification of any changes needed in the requirements development and approval processes of the Department 

of Defense to facilitate effective and efficient implementation 

of such strategy, including an identification of any consolidation 

of requirements for such services across the Department that 

may achieve increased buying power and efficiency; and 

(5) an identification of any necessary changes to policies, 

procedures, regulations, or statutes. 

(d) BRIEFINGS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense 

for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with 

the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, 

shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing 

regarding the strategy required under subsection (b), including 

the elements required under subsection (c). 

(2) INTERIM BRIEFING.—At the same time that the budget 

for fiscal year 2015 is submitted to Congress under section 

1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Under Secretary 

of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with the Chief Information Officer of the Department 

of Defense, shall provide to the congressional defense committees an interim briefing regarding the strategy required under 

subsection (b). 

SEC. 914. SPACE CONTROL MISSION REPORT. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 

this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 

defense committees a report on the space control mission of the 

Department of Defense. Such report shall include— 

(1) an identification of existing offensive and defensive 

space control systems, policies, and technical possibilities of 

future systems; 

(2) an identification of any gaps or risks in existing space 

control system architecture and possibilities for improvement 

or mitigation of such gaps or risks; 

(3) a description of existing and future sensor coverage 

and ground processing capabilities for space situational awareness; 

(4) an explanation of the extent to which all relevant and 

available information is being utilized for space situational 

awareness to detect, track, and identify objects in space; 

(5) a description of existing space situational awareness 

data sharing practices, including what information is being 

shared and what the benefits and risks of such sharing are 

to the national security of the United States; and 
H. R. 3304—155 

(6) plans for the future space control mission, including 

force levels and structure. 

SEC. 915. RESPONSIVE LAUNCH. 

(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

(1) United States Strategic Command has identified three 

needs as a result of dramatically increased demand and dependence on space capabilities as follows: 

(A) To rapidly augment existing space capabilities 

when needed to expand operational capability. 

(B) To rapidly reconstitute or replenish critical space 

capabilities to preserve continuity of operations capability. 

(C) To rapidly exploit and infuse space technological 

or operational innovations to increase the advantage of 

the United States. 

(2) Operationally responsive low cost launch could assist 

in addressing such needs of the combatant commands. 

(b) STUDY.—The Department of Defense Executive Agent for 

Space shall conduct a study on responsive, low-cost launch efforts. 

Such study shall include— 

(1) a review of existing and past operationally responsive, 

low-cost launch efforts by domestic or foreign governments or 

industry; 

(2) an identification of the conditions or requirements for 

responsive launch that would provide the necessary military 

value, including the requisite payload capacity, timelines for 

responsiveness, and the target launch costs; 

(3) a technology assessment of various methods to develop 

an operationally responsive, low-cost launch capability; and 

(4) an assessment of the viability of greater utilization 

of innovative methods, including the use of secondary payload 

adapters on existing launch vehicles. 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Department of Defense Executive Agent 

for Space shall submit to the congressional defense committees 

a report containing— 

(1) the results of the study conducted under subsection 

(b); and 

(2) a consolidated plan for development within the Department of Defense of an operationally responsive, low-cost launch 

capability. 

(d) GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE REVIEW.—Not later 

than 60 days after the date on which the report required under 

subsection (c) is submitted to the congressional defense committees, 

the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees an assessment of such report 

and any related findings or recommendations that the Comptroller 

General considers appropriate. 

SEC. 916. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR SPACE PROTECTION 

PROGRAM. 

Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 by section 201 for the Department of Defense for research, 

test, development, and evaluation, Air Force, and available for 

the Space Protection Program (PE# 0603830F) as specified in the 

funding table in section 4201, $10,000,000 may not be obligated 

or expended until the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a copy of the study conducted at the 
H. R. 3304—156 

direction of the Deputy Secretary of Defense on the counter space 

strategy of the Department of Defense that resulted in significant 

revisions to that strategy by the Department. 

SEC. 917. EAGLE VISION SYSTEM. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Chief of Staff of the Air 

Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees 

a report on the Eagle Vision system. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall 

include a description and assessment of the various commands, 

components of the Armed Forces, and Defense Agencies to 

which control of the Eagle Vision system could be transferred 

from the Headquarters of the Air Force, including the actions 

to be completed before transfer, potential schedules for transfer, 

and the effects of transfer on the capabilities of the system 

or use of the system by other elements of the Department. 

(b) LIMITATION ON CERTAIN ACTIONS.—The Secretary of the 

Air Force may not undertake any changes to the organization 

or control of the Eagle Vision system until 90 days after the date 

of the submittal to the congressional defense committees of the 

report required by subsection (a). 

Subtitle C—Defense Intelligence and 

Intelligence-Related Activities 

SEC. 921. REVISION OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AUTHORITY TO 

ENGAGE IN COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES AS SECURITY FOR 

INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION ACTIVITIES. 

(a) CONGRESSIONAL SUBMISSION FOR REQUIRED AUDITS.—The 

second sentence of section 432(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by striking ‘‘the intelligence committees’’ and all that 

follows and inserting ‘‘the congressional defense committees and 

the congressional intelligence committees (as defined in section 

437(c) of this title).’’. 

(b) REPEAL OF DESIGNATION OF DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

AS REQUIRED OVERSIGHT AUTHORITY WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF

DEFENSE.—Section 436(4) of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘Defense Intelligence Agency’’ and inserting 

‘‘Department of Defense’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘management and supervision’’ and inserting 

‘‘oversight’’. 

(c) CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT.—Section 437 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘the intelligence committees’’ and inserting ‘‘congressional defense committees and the 

congressional intelligence committees’’; 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘Consistent with’’ and all that follows 

through ‘‘the Secretary’’ and insert ‘‘The Secretary’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘the intelligence committees’’ and 

inserting ‘‘congressional defense committees and the 

congressional intelligence committees’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
H. R. 3304—157 

‘‘(c) CONGRESSIONAL INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this section, the term ‘congressional intelligence committees’ has 

the meaning given the term in section 3 of the National Security 

Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).’’. 

SEC. 922. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE PRIORITIES. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 

this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— 

(1) establish a written policy governing the internal 

coordination and prioritization of intelligence priorities of the 

Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the combatant 

commands, and the military departments to improve identification of the intelligence needs of the Department of Defense; 

(2) identify any significant intelligence gaps of the Office 

of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the combatant 

commands, and the military departments; and 

(3) provide to the congressional defense committees, the 

Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 

Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of 

the Senate a briefing on the policy established under paragraph 

(1) and the gaps identified under paragraph (2). 

SEC. 923. DEFENSE CLANDESTINE SERVICE. 

(a) CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.—Not more than 50 percent of 

the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise 

available to the Department of Defense for the Defense Clandestine 

Service for fiscal year 2014 may be obligated or expended for 

the Defense Clandestine Service until such time as the Secretary 

of Defense certifies to the covered congressional committees that— 

(1) the Defense Clandestine Service is designed primarily 

to— 

(A) fulfill priorities of the Department of Defense that 

are unique to the Department of Defense or otherwise 

unmet; and 

(B) provide unique capabilities to the intelligence 

community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))); and 

(2) the Secretary of Defense has designed metrics that 

will be used to ensure that the Defense Clandestine Service 

is employed as described in paragraph (1). 

(b) ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS.—Not later than 120 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for 

five years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the covered 

congressional committees a detailed assessment of Defense Clandestine Service employment and performance based on the metrics 

referred to in subsection (a)(2). 

(c) NOTIFICATION OF FUTURE CHANGES TO DESIGN.—Following 

the submittal of the certification referred to in subsection (a), in 

the event that any significant change is made to the Defense Clandestine Service, the Secretary shall promptly notify the covered 

congressional committees of the nature of such change. 

(d) QUARTERLY BRIEFINGS.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

quarterly provide to the covered congressional committees a briefing 

on the deployments and collection activities of personnel of the 

Defense Clandestine Service. 

(e) COVERED CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘covered congressional committees’’ means the 

congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee 
H. R. 3304—158 

on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select 

Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 

SEC. 924. PROHIBITION ON NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM 

CONSOLIDATION. 

(a) PROHIBITION.—No amounts authorized to be appropriated 

or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may 

be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment 

of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, to execute— 

(1) the separation of the National Intelligence Program 

budget from the Department of Defense budget; 

(2) the consolidation of the National Intelligence Program 

budget within the Department of Defense budget; or 

(3) the establishment of a new appropriations account or 

appropriations account structure for the National Intelligence 

Program budget. 

(b) BRIEFING REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 30 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and 

the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly provide to the 

congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee 

on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select 

Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a briefing regarding any 

planning relating to the future execution of the activities described 

in subsection (a) that has occurred during the two-year period 

ending on such date and any anticipated future planning relating 

to such execution or related efforts. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM.—The term ‘‘National 

Intelligence Program’’ has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003). 

(2) NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM BUDGET.—The term 

‘‘National Intelligence Program budget’’ means the portions of 

the Department of Defense budget designated as part of the 

National Intelligence Program. 

Subtitle D—Cyberspace-Related Matters 

SEC. 931. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR INVENTORY OF 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TACTICAL DATA LINK SYSTEMS. 

Section 934(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1885; 10 

U.S.C. 2225 note) is amended by inserting ‘‘and an assessment 

of vulnerabilities to such systems in anti-access or area-denial 

environments’’ before the semicolon. 

SEC. 932. AUTHORITIES, CAPABILITIES, AND OVERSIGHT OF THE 

UNITED STATES CYBER COMMAND. 

(a) PROVISION OF CERTAIN OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIES.—The 

Secretary of Defense shall take such actions as the Secretary considers appropriate to provide the United States Cyber Command 

operational military units with infrastructure and equipment 

enabling access to the Internet and other types of networks to 

permit the United States Cyber Command to conduct the peacetime 

and wartime missions of the Command. 

(b) CYBER RANGES.— 
H. R. 3304—159 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall review existing cyber 

ranges and adapt one or more such ranges, as necessary, to 

support training and exercises of cyber units that are assigned 

to execute offensive military cyber operations. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—Each range adapted under paragraph (1) 

shall have the capability to support offensive military operations against targets that— 

(A) have not been previously identified and prepared 

for attack; and 

(B) must be compromised or neutralized immediately 

without regard to whether the adversary can detect or 

attribute the attack. 

(c) PRINCIPAL ADVISOR ON MILITARY CYBER FORCE MATTERS.— 

(1) DESIGNATION.—The Secretary shall designate, from 

among the personnel of the Office of the Under Secretary 

of Defense for Policy, a Principal Cyber Advisor to act as 

the principal advisor to the Secretary on military cyber forces 

and activities. The Secretary may only designate an official 

under this paragraph if such official was appointed to the 

position in which such official serves by and with the advice 

and consent of the Senate. 

(2) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Principal Cyber Advisor shall 

be responsible for the following: 

(A) Overall supervision of cyber activities related to 

offensive missions, defense of the United States, and 

defense of Department of Defense networks, including oversight of policy and operational considerations, resources, 

personnel, and acquisition and technology. 

(B) Such other matters relating to offensive military 

cyber forces as the Secretary shall specify for purposes 

of this subsection. 

(3) CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAM.—The Principal Cyber Advisor 

shall— 

(A) integrate the cyber expertise and perspectives of 

appropriate organizations within the Office of the Secretary 

of Defense, Joint Staff, military departments, Defense 

Agencies, and combatant commands, by establishing and 

maintaining a full-time cross-functional team of subject 

matter experts from those organizations; and 

(B) select team members, and designate a team leader, 

from among those personnel nominated by the heads of 

such organizations. 

(d) TRAINING OF CYBER PERSONNEL.—The Secretary shall establish and maintain training capabilities and facilities in the Armed 

Forces and, as the Secretary considers appropriate, at the United 

States Cyber Command, to support the needs of the Armed Forces 

and the United States Cyber Command for personnel who are 

assigned offensive and defensive cyber missions in the Department 

of Defense. 

SEC. 933. MISSION ANALYSIS FOR CYBER OPERATIONS OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

(a) MISSION ANALYSIS REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

shall conduct a mission analysis of the cyber operations of the 

Department of Defense. 
H. R. 3304—160 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The mission analysis under subsection (a) shall 

include the following: 

(1) The concept of operations and concept of employment 

for cyber operations forces. 

(2) An assessment of the manpower needs for cyber operations forces, including military requirements for both active 

and reserve components and civilian requirements. 

(3) An assessment of the mechanisms for improving recruitment, retention, and management of cyber operations forces, 

including through focused recruiting; educational, training, or 

certification scholarships; bonuses; or the use of short-term 

or virtual deployments without the need for permanent relocation. 

(4) A description of the alignment of the organization and 

reporting chains of the Department, the military departments, 

and the combatant commands. 

(5) An assessment of the current, as of the date of the 

analysis, and projected equipping needs of cyber operations 

forces. 

(6) An analysis of how the Secretary, for purposes of cyber 

operations, depends upon organizations outside of the Department, including industry and international partners. 

(7) Methods for ensuring resilience, mission assurance, and 

continuity of operations for cyber operations. 

(8) An evaluation of the potential roles of the reserve 

components in the concept of operations and concept of employment for cyber operations forces required under paragraph 

(1), including— 

(A) in consultation with the Secretaries of the military 

departments and the Commander of the United States 

Cyber Command, an identification of the Department of 

Defense cyber mission requirements that could be discharged by members of the reserve components; 

(B) in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland 

Security, consideration of ways to ensure that the Governors of the several States, through the Council of Governors, as appropriate, have an opportunity to provide the 

Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security an independent evaluation of State cyber capabilities, 

and State cyber needs that cannot be fulfilled through 

the private sector; 

(C) an identification of the existing capabilities, facilities, and plans for cyber activities of the reserve components, including— 

(i) an identification of current positions in the 

reserve components serving Department cyber missions; 

(ii) an inventory of the existing cyber skills of 

reserve component personnel, including the skills of 

units and elements of the reserve components that 

are transitioning to cyber missions; 

(iii) an inventory of the existing infrastructure of 

the reserve components that contributes to the cyber 

missions of the United States Cyber Command, 

including the infrastructure available to units and elements of the reserve components that are transitioning 

to such missions; and 
H. R. 3304—161 

(iv) an assessment of the manner in which the 

military departments plan to use the reserve components to meet total force resource requirements, and 

the effect of such plans on the potential ability of 

members of the reserve components to support the 

cyber missions of the United States Cyber Command; 

(D) an assessment of whether the National Guard, 

when activated in a State status (either State Active Duty 

or in a duty status under title 32, United States Code) 

can operate under unique and useful authorities to support 

domestic cyber missions and requirements of the Department or the United States Cyber Command; 

(E) an assessment of the appropriateness of hiring 

on a part-time basis non-dual status technicians who possess appropriate cyber security expertise for purposes of 

assisting the National Guard in protecting critical infrastructure and carrying out cyber missions; 

(F) an assessment of the current and potential ability 

of the reserve components to— 

(i) attract and retain personnel with substantial, 

relevant cyber technical expertise who use those skills 

in the private sector; 

(ii) organize such personnel into units at the State, 

regional, or national level under appropriate command 

and control arrangements for Department cyber missions; 

(iii) meet and sustain the training standards of 

the United States Cyber Command; and 

(iv) establish and manage career paths for such 

personnel; 

(G) a determination of how the reserve components 

could contribute to total force solutions to cyber operations 

requirements of the United States Cyber Command; and 

(H) development of an estimate of the personnel, infrastructure, and training required, and the costs that would 

be incurred, in connection with implementing a strategy 

for integrating the reserve components into the total force 

for support of the cyber missions of the Department and 

United States Cyber Command, including by taking into 

account the potential savings under the strategy through 

use of personnel referred to in subparagraph (C)(i), provided that for specific cyber units that exist or are 

transitioning to a cyber mission, the estimate shall examine 

whether there are misalignments in existing plans between 

unit missions and facility readiness to support such missions. 

(c) LIMITATIONS ON CERTAIN ACTIONS.— (1) REDUCTION IN PERSONNEL OF AIR NATIONAL GUARD

CYBER UNITS.—No reduction in personnel of a cyber unit of 

the Air National Guard of the United States may be implemented or carried out in fiscal year 2014 before the submittal 

of the report required by subsection (d). 

(2) REDUCTION IN PERSONNEL AND CAPACITY OF AIR

NATIONAL GUARD RED TEAMS.—No reduction in the personnel 

or capacity of a Red Team of the Air National Guard of the 

United States may be implemented or carried out unless the 

report required by subsection (d) includes a certification that 
H. R. 3304—162 

the personnel or capacity to be reduced is directly related 

to Red Team capabilities that are no longer required. 

(d) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after the 

completion of the mission analysis under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 

containing— 

(1) the results of the mission analysis; 

(2) recommendations for improving or changing the roles, 

organization, missions, concept of operations, or authorities 

related to the cyber operations of the Department; and 

(3) any other matters concerning the mission analysis that 

the Secretary considers appropriate. 

(e) NATIONAL GUARD ASSESSMENT.—Not later than 30 days 

after the date on which the Secretary submits the report required 

under subsection (d), the Chief of the National Guard Bureau 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment 

of the role of the National Guard in supporting the cyber operations 

mission of the Department of Defense as such mission is described 

in such report. 

(f) FORM.—The report under subsection (d) shall be submitted 

in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

SEC. 934. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRESS IN DEFENDING THE 

DEPARTMENT AND THE DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL BASE FROM 

CYBER EVENTS. 

Section 935(b)(3) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4339) 

is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘capabilities.’’ and 

inserting ‘‘capabilities, including estimated economic impacts.’’; 

and 

(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘remediation.’’ and 

inserting ‘‘remediation and estimates of economic losses 

resulting from such event.’’. 

SEC. 935. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE SOFTWARE 

LICENSES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

(a) UPDATED PLAN.— (1) UPDATE.—The Chief Information Officer of the Department of the Defense shall, in consultation with the chief 

information officers of the military departments and the 

Defense Agencies, update the plan for the inventory of selected 

software licenses of the Department of Defense required under 

section 937 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 2013 

(Public Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 2223 note) to include a plan 

for the inventory of all software licenses of the Department 

of Defense for which a military department spends more than 

$5,000,000 annually on any individual title, including a 

comparison of licenses purchased with licenses in use. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The update required under paragraph (1) 

shall— 

(A) include plans for implementing an automated solution capable of reporting the software license compliance 

position of the Department and providing a verified audit 

trail, or an audit trail otherwise produced and verified 

by an independent third party; 
H. R. 3304—163 

(B) include details on the process and business systems 

necessary to regularly perform reviews, a procedure for 

validating and reporting deregistering and registering new 

software, and a mechanism and plan to relay that information to the appropriate chief information officer; and 

(C) a proposed timeline for implementation of the 

updated plan in accordance with paragraph (3). 

(3) SUBMISSION.—Not later than September 30, 2015, the 

Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees the updated 

plan required under paragraph (1). 

(b) PERFORMANCE PLAN.—If the Chief Information Officer of 

the Department of Defense determines through the implementation 

of the process and business systems in the updated plan required 

by subsection (a) that the number of software licenses of the Department for an individual title for which a military department spends 

greater than $5,000,000 annually exceeds the needs of the Department for such software licenses, or the inventory discloses that 

there is a discrepancy between the number of software licenses 

purchased and those in actual use, the Chief Information Officer 

of the Department of Defense shall implement a plan to bring 

the number of such software licenses into balance with the needs 

of the Department and the terms of any relevant contract. 

SEC. 936. CYBER OUTREACH AND THREAT AWARENESS FOR SMALL 

BUSINESSES. 

Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of 

this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committees 

on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate 

a briefing on options for strengthening outreach and threat awareness programs for small businesses (as defined in section 3 of 

the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)) that are awarded contracts 

by the Department of Defense to assist such businesses to— 

(1) understand the gravity and scope of cyber threats; 

(2) develop a plan to protect intellectual property; and 

(3) develop a plan to protect the networks of such 

businesses. 

SEC. 937. JOINT FEDERATED CENTERS FOR TRUSTED DEFENSE SYSTEMS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

(a) FEDERATION REQUIRED.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide 

for the establishment of a joint federation of capabilities to 

support the trusted defense system needs of the Department 

of Defense (in this section referred to as the ‘‘federation’’). 

(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the federation shall be to 

serve as a joint, Department-wide federation of capabilities 

to support the trusted defense system needs of the Department 

to ensure security in the software and hardware developed, 

acquired, maintained, and used by the Department, pursuant 

to the trusted defense systems strategy of the Department 

and supporting policies related to software assurance and 

supply chain risk management. 

(b) DISCHARGE OF ESTABLISHMENT.—In providing for the 

establishment of the federation, the Secretary shall consider 

whether the purpose of the federation can be met by existing 

centers in the Department. If the Department determines that 

there are capabilities gaps that cannot be satisfied by existing 
H. R. 3304—164 

centers, the Department shall devise a strategy for creating and 

providing resources for such capabilities to fill such gaps. 

(c) CHARTER.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue a charter for the 

federation. The charter shall— 

(1) be established pursuant to the trusted defense systems 

strategy of the Department and supporting policies related 

to software assurance and supply chain risk management; and 

(2) set forth— 

(A) the role of the federation in supporting program 

offices in implementing the trusted defense systems 

strategy of the Department; 

(B) the software and hardware assurance expertise 

and capabilities of the federation, including policies, standards, requirements, best practices, contracting, training, 

and testing; 

(C) the requirements for the discharge by the federation, in coordination with the Center for Assured Software 

of the National Security Agency, of a program of research 

and development to improve automated software code 

vulnerability analysis and testing tools; 

(D) the requirements for the federation to procure, 

manage, and distribute enterprise licenses for automated 

software vulnerability analysis tools; and 

(E) the requirements for the discharge by the federation, in coordination with the Defense Microelectronics 

Activity, of a program of research and development to 

improve hardware vulnerability, testing, and protection 

tools. 

(d) REPORT.—The Secretary shall submit to the congressional 

defense committees, at the time of the submittal to Congress of 

the budget of the President for fiscal year 2016 pursuant to section 

1105 of title 31, United States Code, a report on the funding 

and management of the federation. The report shall set forth such 

recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate regarding 

the optimal placement of the federation within the organizational 

structure of the Department, including responsibility for the funding 

and management of the federation. 

SEC. 938. SUPERVISION OF THE ACQUISITION OF CLOUD COMPUTING 

CAPABILITIES. 

(a) SUPERVISION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall, acting 

through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of 

Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council, supervise the following: 

(A) Review, development, modification, and approval 

of requirements for cloud computing solutions for data analysis and storage by the Armed Forces and the Defense 

Agencies, including requirements for cross-domain, enterprise-wide discovery and correlation of data stored in cloud 

and non-cloud computing databases, relational and nonrelational databases, and hybrid databases. 

(B) Review, development, modification, approval, and 

implementation of plans for the competitive acquisition 
H. R. 3304—165 

of cloud computing systems or services to meet requirements described in subparagraph (A), including plans for 

the transition from current computing systems to systems 

or services acquired. 

(C) Development and implementation of plans to 

ensure that the cloud systems or services acquired pursuant 

to subparagraph (B) are interoperable and universally 

accessible and usable through attribute-based access controls. 

(D) Integration of plans under subparagraphs (B) and 

(C) with enterprise-wide plans of the Armed Forces and 

the Department of Defense for the Joint Information 

Environment and the Defense Intelligence Information 

Environment. 

(2) DIRECTION.—The Secretary shall provide direction to 

the Armed Forces and the Defense Agencies on the matters 

covered by paragraph (1) by not later than March 15, 2014. 

(b) INTEGRATION WITH INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY EFFORTS.— 

The Secretary shall coordinate with the Director of National Intelligence to ensure that activities under this section are integrated 

with the Intelligence Community Information Technology Enterprise in order to achieve interoperability, information sharing, and 

other efficiencies. 

(c) LIMITATION.—The requirements of subparagraphs (B), (C), 

and (D) of subsection (a)(1) shall not apply to a contract for the 

acquisition of cloud computing capabilities in an amount less than 

$1,000,000. 

(d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 

construed to alter or affect the authorities or responsibilities of 

the Director of National Intelligence under section 102A of the 

National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3024). 

SEC. 939. CYBER VULNERABILITIES OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

WEAPON SYSTEMS AND TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than one year after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to Congress a report on the status of the capability of each military 

department to operate in non-permissive and hostile cyber environments. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall 

include the following: 

(1) A description and assessment of potential cyber threats 

or threat systems to major weapon systems and tactical communications systems that could emerge in the next five years. 

(2) A description and assessment of cyber vulnerabilities 

of current major weapon and tactical communications systems. 

(3) A detailed description of the current strategy to detect, 

deter, and defend against cyber attacks on current and planned 

major weapon systems and tactical communications systems. 

(4) An estimate of the costs anticipated to be incurred 

in addressing cyber vulnerabilities to Department of Defense 

weapon systems and tactical communications systems over the 

next five years. 

(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 
H. R. 3304—166 

SEC. 940. CONTROL OF THE PROLIFERATION OF CYBER WEAPONS. 

(a) INTERAGENCY PROCESS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF POLICY.— 

The President shall establish an interagency process to provide 

for the establishment of an integrated policy to control the proliferation of cyber weapons through unilateral and cooperative law 

enforcement activities, financial means, diplomatic engagement, and 

such other means as the President considers appropriate. 

(b) INDUSTRY PARTICIPATION.—The President shall include, to 

the extent practicable, private industry participation in the process 

established under subsection (a). 

(c) OBJECTIVES.—The objectives of the interagency process 

established under subsection (a) shall be as follows: 

(1) To identify the intelligence, law enforcement, and financial sanctions tools that can and should be used to suppress 

the trade in cyber tools and infrastructure that are or can 

be used for criminal, terrorist, or military activities while preserving the ability of governments and the private sector to 

use such tools for legitimate purposes of self-defense. 

(2) To establish a statement of principles to control the 

proliferation of cyber weapons, including principles for controlling the proliferation of cyber weapons that can lead to 

expanded cooperation and engagement with international partners. 

(d) RECOMMENDATIONS.—The interagency process established 

under subsection (a) shall develop, by not later than 270 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, recommendations on 

means for the control of the proliferation of cyber weapons, including 

a draft statement of principles and a review of applicable legal 

authorities. 

SEC. 941. INTEGRATED POLICY TO DETER ADVERSARIES IN CYBERSPACE. 

(a) INTEGRATED POLICY.—The President shall establish an 

interagency process to provide for the development of an integrated 

policy to deter adversaries in cyberspace. 

(b) OBJECTIVE.—The objective of the interagency process established under subsection (a) shall be to develop a deterrence policy 

for reducing cyber risks to the United States and our allies. 

(c) REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees a report setting forth 

the integrated policy developed pursuant to subsection (a). 

(2) FORM.—The report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

SEC. 942. NATIONAL CENTERS OF ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE IN 

INFORMATION ASSURANCE EDUCATION MATTERS. 

(a) PRESERVATION OF DESIGNATION DURING ACADEMIC YEARS

2013–2014 AND 2014–2015.—Each institution of higher education 

that was designated by the National Security Agency and the 

Department of Homeland Security as a National Center of Academic 

Excellence in Information Assurance Education as of January 1, 

2013, shall continue to be designated as such a Center through 

June 30, 2015, provided that such institution maintains the standards by which such institution was originally designated as such 

a Center. 
H. R. 3304—167 

(b) ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATION OF ACCREDITATION OR

DESIGNATION PROCESS.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of the 

National Security Agency, and other appropriate departments and 

agencies of the Federal Government and non-Federal organizations, 

shall— 

(1) assess the National Centers of Academic Excellence 

in Information Assurance Education program strengths and 

weaknesses, including processes and criteria used to develop 

curricula and designate an institution of higher education as 

a National Center of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education; 

(2) assess the maturity of information assurance as an 

academic discipline; 

(3) assess the role the Federal Government should play 

in the future development of curricula and other criteria for 

designating or accrediting information assurance education programs of institutions of higher education as National Centers 

of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education; 

(4) assess the advantages and disadvantages of broadening 

the governance structure of such Centers; 

(5) assess the extent to which existing and emerging curricula and other criteria for designation as such a Center is 

aligned with the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education 

and will provide the knowledge and skills needed by the 

information assurance workforce for existing and future employment; 

(6) make recommendations for improving and evolving the 

mechanisms and processes for developing the curricula and 

other criteria for accrediting or designating information assurance programs of institutions of higher education as Centers; 

and 

(7) make recommendations on transitioning the responsibility for developing the curricula and other criteria for accrediting or designating information assurance programs of institutions of higher education as Centers from the sole administration of the National Security Agency. 

(c) ASSESSMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE COLLABORATION

WITH CENTERS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall assess the 

collaboration of the Department of Defense with the National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education. 

Such assessment shall include— 

(1) the extent to which the information security scholarship 

program of the Department of Defense established under 

chapter 112 of title 10, United States Code, contributes to— 

(A) building the capacity to educate the information 

assurance and cybersecurity workforce needed for the 

future; and 

(B) employing exceptional information assurance and 

cybersecurity workers in the Department; and 

(2) mechanisms for increasing Department employment of 

graduates of such Centers. 

(d) PLAN.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in 
H. R. 3304—168 

consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the 

Director of the National Security Agency, and other appropriate 

departments and agencies of the Federal Government and nonFederal organizations, shall submit to Congress— 

(A) a plan for implementing the recommendations 

made pursuant to subsection (b) on improving and evolving 

the mechanisms and processes for developing the curricula 

and other criteria for accrediting or designating the 

information assurance programs of institutions of higher 

education as National Centers of Academic Excellence in 

Information Assurance Education; 

(B) the results of the assessments conducted under 

subsections (b) and (c); and 

(C) the recommendations made under subsection (b). 

(2) CONSULTATION.—In developing the plan under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consult with appropriate representatives of information assurance interests in departments 

and agencies of the Federal Government, State and local 

governments, academia, and the private sector. 

(e) INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘institution of higher education’’ has the meaning 

given the term in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 

1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001). 

Subtitle E—Total Force Management 

SEC. 951. REVIEWS OF APPROPRIATE MANPOWER PERFORMANCE. 

(a) REPORTS REQUIRED.—Section 2330a of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections 

(i) and (j), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new subsections (g) and (h): 

‘‘(g) INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than May 1 of 

each year, beginning with 2014 and ending with 2016, the Inspector 

General of the Department of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the Inspector General’s assessment of— 

‘‘(1) the efforts by the Department of Defense to compile 

the inventory pursuant to subsection (c); and 

‘‘(2) the reviews conducted under subsection (e), including 

the actions taken to resolve the findings of the reviews in 

accordance with section 2463 of this title. 

‘‘(h) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than September 30 of each year, beginning with 2014 and ending with 

2016, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a report containing the 

Comptroller General’s assessment of the efforts by the Department 

of Defense to implement subsections (e) and (f).’’. 

(b) EXTENSION OF COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON INVENTORY.—Section 803(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2402) is amended 

by striking ‘‘2011 and 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 

and 2015’’. 
H. R. 3304—169 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—Financial Matters 

Sec. 1001. General transfer authority. 

Sec. 1002. Budgetary effects of this Act. 

Sec. 1003. Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 financial statements. 

Sec. 1004. Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization. 

Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities 

Sec. 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia. 

Sec. 1012. Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities. 

Sec. 1013. Extension and expansion of authority to provide additional support for 

counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments. 

Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards 

Sec. 1021. Modification of requirements for annual long-range plan for the construction of naval vessels. 

Sec. 1022. Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship donations at no cost 

to the Navy. 

Sec. 1023. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga class 

cruisers or dock landing ships. 

Sec. 1024. Extension and remediation of Navy contracting actions. 

Sec. 1025. Report comparing costs of DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III ships. 

Sec. 1026. Report on naval vessels and the Force Structure Assessment. 

Sec. 1027. Modification of policy relating to major combatant vessels of the strike 

forces of the Navy. 

Subtitle D—Counterterrorism 

Sec. 1031. Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members on military commissions. 

Sec. 1032. Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program reporting requirement. 

Sec. 1033. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United 

States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, 

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1034. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals 

detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1035. Transfers to foreign countries of individuals detained at United States 

Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1036. Report on information relating to individuals detained at Parwan, Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1037. Grade of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in military commissions established to try individuals detained at Guantanamo. 

Sec. 1038. Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain, rehabilitate, and 

prosecute individuals detained at Guantanamo who are transferred to 

Yemen. 

Sec. 1039. Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained at Guantanamo 

if transferred to the United States. 

Subtitle E—Sensitive Military Operations 

Sec. 1041. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations. 

Sec. 1042. Counterterrorism operational briefings. 

Sec. 1043. Report on process for determining targets of lethal or capture operations. 

Subtitle F—Nuclear Forces 

Sec. 1051. Notification required for reduction or consolidation of dual-capable aircraft based in Europe. 

Sec. 1052. Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and 

Communications System. 

Sec. 1053. Modification of responsibilities and reporting requirements of Nuclear 

Weapons Council. 

Sec. 1054. Modification of deadline for report on plan for nuclear weapons stockpile, 

nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery systems, and nuclear weapons command and control system. 

Sec. 1055. Prohibition on elimination of nuclear triad. 
H. R. 3304—170 

Sec. 1056. Implementation of New START Treaty. 

Sec. 1057. Retention of capability to redeploy multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles. 

Sec. 1058. Report on New START Treaty. 

Sec. 1059. Report on implementation of the recommendations of the Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation Report. 

Sec. 1060. Sense of Congress on further strategic nuclear arms reductions with the 

Russian Federation. 

Sec. 1061. Sense of Congress on compliance with nuclear arms control treaty obligations. 

Sec. 1062. Senses of Congress on ensuring the modernization of the nuclear forces 

of the United States. 

Subtitle G—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations 

Sec. 1071. Enhancement of capacity of the United States Government to analyze 

captured records. 

Sec. 1072. Strategic plan for the management of the electromagnetic spectrum. 

Sec. 1073. Extension of authority to provide military transportation services to certain other agencies at the Department of Defense reimbursement rate. 

Sec. 1074. Notification of modifications to Army force structure. 

Sec. 1075. Aircraft joint training. 

Subtitle H—Studies and Reports 

Sec. 1081. Online availability of reports submitted to Congress. 

Sec. 1082. Oversight of combat support agencies. 

Sec. 1083. Inclusion in annual report of description of interagency coordination relating to humanitarian demining technology. 

Sec. 1084. Repeal and modification of reporting requirements. 

Sec. 1085. Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General assessment of Department of Defense efficiencies. 

Sec. 1086. Review and assessment of United States Special Operations Forces and 

United States Special Operations Command. 

Sec. 1087. Reports on unmanned aircraft systems. 

Sec. 1088. Report on foreign language support contracts for the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1089. Civil Air Patrol. 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

Sec. 1091. Technical and clerical amendments. 

Sec. 1092. Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major automated information system programs. 

Sec. 1093. Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to issue non-premium aviation insurance. 

Sec. 1094. Extension of Ministry of Defense Advisor Program and authority to 

waive reimbursement of costs of activities for certain nongovernmental 

personnel. 

Sec. 1095. Amendments to certain national commissions. 

Sec. 1096. Strategy for future military information operations capabilities. 

Sec. 1097. Sense of Congress on collaboration on border security. 

Sec. 1098. Transfer of aircraft to other departments for wildfire suppression and 

other purposes; tactical airlift fleet of the Air Force. 

Subtitle A—Financial Matters 

SEC. 1001. GENERAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATIONS.— 

(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of 

Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, 

the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made 

available to the Department of Defense in this division for 

fiscal year 2014 between any such authorizations for that fiscal 

year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations 

so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the 

same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. 

(2) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in paragraph (3), the 

total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer 
H. R. 3304—171 

under the authority of this section may not exceed 

$5,000,000,000. 

(3) EXCEPTION FOR TRANSFERS BETWEEN MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS.—A transfer of funds between military 

personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted 

toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2). 

(b) LIMITATIONS.—The authority provided by subsection (a) to 

transfer authorizations— 

(1) may only be used to provide authority for items that 

have a higher priority than the items from which authority 

is transferred; and 

(2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that 

has been denied authorization by Congress. 

(c) EFFECT ON AUTHORIZATION AMOUNTS.—A transfer made 

from one account to another under the authority of this section 

shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account 

to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the 

amount transferred. 

(d) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary shall promptly notify 

Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a). 

SEC. 1002. BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF THIS ACT. 

The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purposes of complying 

with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined 

by reference to the latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of 

PAYGO Legislation’’ for this Act, jointly submitted for printing 

in the Congressional Record by the Chairmen of the House and 

Senate Budget Committees, provided that such statement has been 

submitted prior to the vote on passage in the House acting first 

on the conference report or amendment between the Houses. 

SEC. 1003. AUDIT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FISCAL YEAR 2018 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 

(a) AUDIT OF DOD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.—In addition to 

the requirement under section 1003(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111– 

84; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) that the Financial Improvement and 

Audit Readiness Plan describe specific actions to be taken and 

the costs associated with ensuring that the financial statements 

of the Department of Defense are validated as ready for audit 

by not later than September 30, 2017, upon the conclusion of 

fiscal year 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that a 

full audit is performed on the financial statements of the Department of Defense for such fiscal year. The Secretary shall submit 

to Congress the results of that audit by not later than March 

31, 2019. 

(b) INCLUSION OF AUDIT IN FINANCIAL IMPROVEMENT AUDIT

READINESS PLAN.—Section 1003(a)(2)(A) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 

U.S.C. 2222 note) is amended— 

(1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon; 

and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new clause: 

‘‘(iii) ensuring the audit of the financial statements 

of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2018 

occurs by not later than March 31, 2019.’’. 
H. R. 3304—172 

SEC. 1004. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER FUNDS TO THE NATIONAL 

NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO SUSTAIN 

NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION. 

(a) TRANSFER AUTHORIZED.—If the amount authorized to be 

appropriated for the weapons activities of the National Nuclear 

Security Administration under section 3101 or otherwise made 

available for fiscal year 2014 is less than $8,400,000,000 (the 

amount projected to be required for such activities in fiscal year 

2014 as specified in the report under section 1251 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111– 

84; 123 Stat. 2549)), the Secretary of Defense may transfer, from 

amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of 

Defense for fiscal year 2014 pursuant to this Act, to the Secretary 

of Energy an amount, not to exceed $150,000,000, to be available 

only for weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security 

Administration. 

(b) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—In the event of a transfer under 

subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall promptly notify Congress of the transfer, and shall include in such notice the Department of Defense account or accounts from which funds are transferred. 

(c) TRANSFER MECHANISM.—Any funds transferred under this 

section shall be transferred in accordance with established procedures for reprogramming under section 1001 or successor provisions 

of law. 

(d) CONSTRUCTION OF AUTHORITY.—The transfer authority provided under subsection (a) is in addition to any other transfer 

authority provided under this Act. 

Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities 

SEC. 1011. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT UNIFIED 

COUNTER-DRUG AND COUNTERTERRORISM CAMPAIGN IN 

COLOMBIA. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public 

Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2042), as most recently amended by section 

1010 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1907), is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting 

‘‘2014’’; and 

(2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting 

‘‘2014’’. 

(b) NOTICE TO CONGRESS ON ASSISTANCE.—Not later than 15 

days before providing assistance under section 1021 of the Ronald 

W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2005 (as amended by subsection (a)) using funds available for 

fiscal year 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a notice setting forth the assistance to be provided, including the types of such assistance, the 

budget for such assistance, and the anticipated completion date 

and duration of the provision of such assistance. 
H. R. 3304—173 

SEC. 1012. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR JOINT TASK FORCES TO 

PROVIDE SUPPORT TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES 

CONDUCTING COUNTER-TERRORISM ACTIVITIES. 

Section 1022(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1594; 10 U.S.C. 

371 note), as most recently amended by section 1011 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112– 

239; 126 Stat. 1907) is amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting 

‘‘2015’’. 

SEC. 1013. EXTENSION AND EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE 

ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES 

OF CERTAIN FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public 

Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by section 

1006 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1557), is further amended 

by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2016’’. 

(b) MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF SUPPORT.—Subsection (e)(2) of such 

section 1033, as so amended, is further amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ 

and inserting ‘‘2016’’. 

(c) ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENTS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE SUP- PORT.—Subsection (b) of such section 1033, as so amended, is further 

amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(36) Government of Chad. 

‘‘(37) Government of Libya. 

‘‘(38) Government of Mali. 

‘‘(39) Government of Niger.’’. 

Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards 

SEC. 1021. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS FOR ANNUAL LONGRANGE PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NAVAL VESSELS. 

(a) ANNUAL NAVAL VESSEL CONSTRUCTION PLAN.—Subsection 

(b) of section 231 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘should be designed’’ both places it 

appears and inserting ‘‘shall be designed’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘is capable of supporting’’ both places 

it appears and inserting ‘‘supports’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘and capabilities’’ 

after ‘‘naval vessel force structure’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(D) The estimated total cost of construction for each vessel 

used to determine estimated levels of annual funding under 

subparagraph (C).’’. 

(b) ASSESSMENT WHEN CONSTRUCTION PLAN DOES NOT MEET

FORCE STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS.—Such section is further 

amended by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following 

new subsection (c): 

‘‘(c) ASSESSMENT WHEN ANNUAL NAVAL VESSEL CONSTRUCTION

PLAN DOES NOT MEET FORCE STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS.—If the 
H. R. 3304—174 

annual naval vessel construction plan for a fiscal year under subsection (b) does not result in a force structure or capabilities that 

meet the requirements identified in subsection (b)(2)(B), the Secretary shall include with the defense budget materials for that 

fiscal year an assessment of the extent of the strategic and operational risk to national security associated with the reduced force 

structure of naval vessels over the period of time that the required 

force structure or capabilities are not achieved. Such assessment 

shall include an analysis of whether the risks are acceptable, and 

plans to mitigate such risks. Such assessment shall be coordinated 

in advance with the commanders of the combatant commands and 

the Nuclear Weapons Council under section 179 of this title.’’. 

SEC. 1022. CLARIFICATION OF SOLE OWNERSHIP RESULTING FROM 

SHIP DONATIONS AT NO COST TO THE NAVY. 

(a) CLARIFICATION OF TRANSFER AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) 

of section 7306 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to 

read as follows: 

‘‘(a) AUTHORITY TO MAKE TRANSFER.—The Secretary of the 

Navy may convey, by donation, all right, title, and interest to 

any vessel stricken from the Naval Vessel Register or any captured 

vessel, for use as a museum or memorial for public display in 

the United States, to— 

‘‘(1) any State, the District of Columbia, any Commonwealth or possession of the United States, or any municipal 

corporation or political subdivision thereof; or 

‘‘(2) any nonprofit entity.’’. 

(b) CLARIFICATION OF LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(b) LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY.—(1) The 

United States and all departments and agencies thereof, and their 

officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity 

for any injury or damage to any person or property occurring 

on a vessel donated under this section. 

‘‘(2) Notwithstanding any other law, the Department of Defense, 

and the officers and employees of the Department of Defense, shall 

have no responsibility or obligation to make, engage in, or provide 

funding for, any improvement, upgrade, modification, maintenance, 

preservation, or repair to a vessel donated under this section.’’. 

(c) CLARIFICATION THAT TRANSFERS TO BE MADE AT NO COST

TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of such section is 

amended— 

(A) by inserting after ‘‘under this section’’ the following: 

‘‘, the maintenance and preservation of that vessel as a 

museum or memorial, and the ultimate disposal of that 

vessel, including demilitarization of Munitions List items 

at the end of the useful life of the vessel as a museum 

or memorial,’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘the United States’’ and inserting ‘‘the 

Department of Defense’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The heading for subsection (c) 

of such section is amended by striking ‘‘UNITED STATES’’ and 

inserting ‘‘DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE’’. 

(d) APPLICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS; DEFINITIONS.—Such 

section is further amended by adding at the end the following 

new subsections: 
H. R. 3304—175 

‘‘(e) APPLICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS.—Nothing in this 

section shall affect the applicability of Federal, State, interstate, 

and local environmental laws and regulations, including the Toxic 

Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 

1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), to the Department of Defense or 

to a donee. 

‘‘(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘nonprofit entity’ means any entity qualifying 

as an exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) of the 

Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘Munitions List’ means the United States 

Munitions List created and controlled under section 38 of the 

Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778). 

‘‘(3) The term ‘donee’ means any entity receiving a vessel 

pursuant to subsection (a).’’. 

(e) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

(1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 7306. Vessels stricken from Naval Vessel Register; captured vessels: conveyance by donation’’. 

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The item relating to such section 

in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 633 of 

such title is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘7306. Vessels stricken from Naval Vessel Register; captured vessels: conveyance by 

donation.’ ’’’. 

SEC. 1023. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RETIREMENT OR INACTIVATION OF TICONDEROGA CLASS CRUISERS OR DOCK 

LANDING SHIPS. 

(a) LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Except as provided 

in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated 

by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for 

the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire, 

prepare to retire, inactivate, or place in storage a cruiser or dock 

landing ship. 

(b) EXCEPTION.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), the funds 

referred to in such subsection may be obligated or expended to 

retire the U.S.S. Denver, LPD9. 

SEC. 1024. EXTENSION AND REMEDIATION OF NAVY CONTRACTING 

ACTIONS. 

(a) AUTHORITY FOR SHORT-TERM EXTENSION OR RENEWAL OF

LEASES FOR VESSELS SUPPORTING THE TRANSIT PROTECTION SYSTEM

ESCORT PROGRAM.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 2401 of title 10, 

United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may extend 

or renew the lease of not more than four blocking vessels 

supporting the Transit Protection System Escort Program after 

the date of the expiration of the lease of such vessels, as 

in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. Such an 

extension shall be for a term that is the shorter of— 

(A) the period beginning on the date of the expiration 

of the lease in effect on the date of the enactment of 

this Act and ending on the date on which the Secretary 

determines that a substitute is available for the capabilities 
H. R. 3304—176 

provided by the lease, or that the capabilities provided 

by the vessel are no longer required; or 

(B) 180 days. 

(2) FUNDING.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated by 

section 301 and available for operation and maintenance, Navy, 

as specified in the funding tables in section 4301, may be 

available for the extension or renewal of a lease under paragraph (1). 

(3) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—Prior to extending or renewing 

a lease under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Navy shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees notification 

of the proposed extension or renewal. Such notification shall 

include— 

(A) a detailed description of the term of the proposed 

contract for the extension or renewal of the lease and 

a justification for extending or renewing the lease rather 

than obtaining the capability provided for by the lease, 

charter, or services involved through purchase of the vessel; 

and 

(B) a plan for meeting the capability provided for by 

the lease upon the completion of the term of the lease 

contract, as extended or renewed under paragraph (1). 

(b) AUTHORITY FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PAYMENT IN KIND IN

SETTLEMENT OF A–12 AIRCRAFT LITIGATION.—Notwithstanding any 

other provision of law, during fiscal year 2014 and any subsequent 

fiscal year, the Secretary of the Navy is authorized to accept and 

retain the following consideration in lieu of a monetary payment 

for purposes of the settlement of A–12 aircraft litigation arising 

from the default termination of Contract No. N00019-88-C-0050: 

(1) From General Dynamics Corporation, credit in an amount not to exceed $198,000,000 toward the design, construction, and delivery of the steel deckhouse, hangar, and aft missile 

launching system for the DDG 1002. 

(2) From the Boeing Company, three EA-18G Growler aircraft, with installed Airborne Electric Attack kits, valued at 

an amount not to exceed $198,000,000, at no cost to the Department of the Navy. 

SEC. 1025. REPORT COMPARING COSTS OF DDG 1000 AND DDG 51 

FLIGHT III SHIPS. 

Not later than March 15, 2014, the Secretary of the Navy 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report providing an updated comparison of the costs and risks of acquiring 

DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III vessels equipped for enhanced 

ballistic missile defense capability. The report shall include each 

of the following: 

(1) An updated estimate of the total cost to develop, procure, operate, and support ballistic missile defense capable 

DDG 1000 destroyers equipped with the air and missile defense 

radar. 

(2) The estimate of the Secretary of the total cost of the 

current plan to develop, procure, operate, and support Flight 

III DDG 51 destroyers. 

(3) Details on the assumed ballistic missile defense requirements and construction schedules for both the DDG 1000 and 

DDG 51 Flight III destroyers referred to in paragraphs (1) 

and (2), respectively. 
H. R. 3304—177 

(4) An updated comparison of the program risks and the 

resulting ship capabilities in all dimensions (not just ballistic 

missile defense) of the options referred to in paragraphs (1) 

and (2). 

(5) Any other information the Secretary determines appropriate. 

SEC. 1026. REPORT ON NAVAL VESSELS AND THE FORCE STRUCTURE 

ASSESSMENT. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after the date 

of the submittal of the annual naval vessel construction plan 

required under section 231 of title 10, United States Code, for 

fiscal year 2015, the Chief of Naval Operations shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees a report on the current 

requirements for combatant vessels of the Navy and the anticipated 

requirements for such vessels during the 30-year period following 

the submittal of the report. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall 

include each of the following: 

(1) A description of the naval capability requirements 

identified by the combatant commands in developing the Force 

Structure Assessment in 2005 and revalidating that Assessment 

in 2010. 

(2) The capabilities for each class of vessel that was 

assumed in the Force Structure Assessment. 

(3) An assessment of the capabilities of the current fleet 

of combatant vessels of the Navy to meet current and anticipated requirements. 

(4) An assessment of how the Navy is currently managing 

deployment schedules to meet combatant commander requirements with a smaller force than specified in the Force Structure 

Assessment of 2005, including the impact on— 

(A) the material condition of the naval force due to 

longer deployment times; and 

(B) long-term retention rates, especially in critical 

specialties. 

(5) An assessment of the capabilities of the anticipated 

fleet of combatant vessels of the Navy to meet emerging threats 

over the next 30 years. 

(6) An assessment of how the Navy will meet combatant 

command requirements for forward-deployed naval capabilities 

with a smaller number of ships and submarines. 

(7) An assessment of how the Navy will manage the risk 

of massing a greater set of capabilities on a smaller number 

of ships while facing an expanding range of asymmetrical 

threats, including— 

(A) anti-access/area-denial capabilities; 

(B) diesel-electric submarines; 

(C) mines; and 

(D) anti-ship cruise and ballistic missiles. 

(8) The assessment of the Commandant of the Marine 

Corps of— 

(A) the operational risk associated with the current 

and the planned number of ships of the amphibious assault 

force, including vessels designated as LHA, LHD, LPD, 

or LSD; and 
H. R. 3304—178 

(B) the capabilities required to meet the needs of the 

Marine Corps for future ships of the amphibious assault 

force. 

(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

SEC. 1027. MODIFICATION OF POLICY RELATING TO MAJOR COMBATANT VESSELS OF THE STRIKE FORCES OF THE NAVY. 

Section 1012 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 7291 note) is amended— 

(1) by striking subsection (a) and redesignating subsections 

(b) and (c) as subsections (a) and (b), respectively; and 

(2) in subsection (a), as so redesignated— 

(A) by striking ‘‘the request shall be for’’ and inserting 

‘‘the request shall include a specific assessment of’’; and 

(B) by inserting ‘‘in the analysis of alternatives’’ after 

‘‘nuclear power system’’. 

Subtitle D—Counterterrorism 

SEC. 1031. CLARIFICATION OF PROCEDURES FOR USE OF ALTERNATE 

MEMBERS ON MILITARY COMMISSIONS. 

(a) PRIMARY AND ALTERNATE MEMBERS.— 

(1) NUMBER OF MEMBERS.—Subsection (a) of section 948m 

of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(A) in paragraph (1)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘at least five members’’ and inserting 

‘‘at least five primary members and as many alternate 

members as the convening authority shall detail’’; and 

(ii) by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘Alternate members shall be designated in the 

order in which they will replace an excused primary 

member.’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘primary’’ after ‘‘the 

number of’’. 

(2) GENERAL RULES.—Such section is further amended— 

(A) by redesignating subsection (b) and (c) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively; and 

(B) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 

subsections (b) and (c): 

‘‘(b) PRIMARY MEMBERS.—Primary members of a military 

commission under this chapter are voting members. 

‘‘(c) ALTERNATE MEMBERS.—(1) A military commission may 

include alternate members to replace primary members who are 

excused from service on the commission. 

‘‘(2) Whenever a primary member is excused from service on 

the commission, an alternate member, if available, shall replace 

the excused primary member and the trial may proceed.’’. 

(3) EXCUSE OF MEMBERS.—Subsection (d) of such section, 

as redesignated by paragraph (2)(A), is amended— 

(A) in the matter before paragraph (1), by inserting 

‘‘primary or alternate’’ before ‘‘member’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph (2); 

(C) by striking the period at the end of paragraph 

(3) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

(D) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
H. R. 3304—179 

‘‘(4) in the case of an alternate member, in order to reduce 

the number of alternate members required for service on the 

commission, as determined by the convening authority.’’. 

(4) ABSENT AND ADDITIONAL MEMBERS.—Subsection (e) of 

such section, as redesignated by paragraph (2)(A), is amended— 

(A) in the first sentence— 

(i) by inserting ‘‘the number of primary members 

of’’ after ‘‘Whenever’’; 

(ii) by inserting ‘‘primary’’ before ‘‘members 

required by’’; and 

(iii) by inserting ‘‘and there are no remaining alternate members to replace the excused primary members’’ after ‘‘subsection (a)’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new sentence: 

‘‘An alternate member who was present for the introduction 

of all evidence shall not be considered to be a new or 

additional member.’’. 

(b) CHALLENGES.—Section 949f of such title is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘primary or alternate’’ 

before ‘‘members’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following 

new sentence: ‘‘Nothing in this section prohibits the military 

judge from awarding to each party such additional peremptory 

challenges as may be required in the interests of justice.’’. 

(c) NUMBER OF VOTES REQUIRED.—Section 949m of such title 

is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘primary’’ before ‘‘members’’ each place 

it appears; and 

(2) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following 

new paragraph: 

‘‘(4) The primary members present for a vote on a sentence 

need not be the same primary members who voted on the conviction 

if the requirements of section 948m(d) of this title are met.’’. 

SEC. 1032. MODIFICATION OF REGIONAL DEFENSE COMBATING TERRORISM FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM REPORTING REQUIREMENT. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2249c(c) of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘, including engagement 

activities for program alumni,’’ after ‘‘subsection (a)’’; 

(2) in paragraph (4), by inserting after ‘‘program’’ the following: ‘‘, including a list of any unfunded or unmet training 

requirements and requests’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(5) A discussion and justification of how the program 

fits within the theater security priorities of each of the commanders of the geographic combatant commands.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection 

(a) shall apply with respect to a report submitted for a fiscal 

year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 1033. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO CONSTRUCT OR MODIFY 

FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES TO HOUSE 

DETAINEES TRANSFERRED FROM UNITED STATES NAVAL 

STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—No amounts authorized to be appropriated 

or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may 
H. R. 3304—180 

be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment 

of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, to construct or 

modify any facility in the United States, its territories, or possessions to house any individual detained at Guantanamo for the 

purposes of detention or imprisonment in the custody or under 

the control of the Department of Defense unless authorized by 

Congress. 

(b) EXCEPTION.—The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not 

apply to any modification of facilities at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

(c) INDIVIDUAL DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘individual detained at Guantanamo’’ has the 

meaning given that term in section 1035(e)(2). 

SEC. 1034. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FUNDS FOR THE TRANSFER 

OR RELEASE OF INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED 

STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA. 

No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made 

available to the Department of Defense may be used during the 

period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and 

ending on December 31, 2014, to transfer, release, or assist in 

the transfer or release to or within the United States, its territories, 

or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee 

who— 

(1) is not a United States citizen or a member of the 

Armed Forces of the United States; and 

(2) is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense. 

SEC. 1035. TRANSFERS TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES OF INDIVIDUALS 

DETAINED AT UNITED STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.—The Secretary of Defense is authorized to transfer 

or release any individual detained at Guantanamo to the individual’s country of origin, or any other foreign country, if— 

(1) the Secretary determines, following a review conducted 

in accordance with the requirements of section 1023 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 

U.S.C. 801 note) and Executive Order No. 13567, that the 

individual is no longer a threat to the national security of 

the United States; or 

(2) such transfer or release outside the United States is 

to effectuate an order affecting disposition of the individual 

by a court or competent tribunal of the United States having 

jurisdiction. 

(b) DETERMINATION REQUIRED PRIOR TO TRANSFER.—Except as 

provided in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may transfer 

an individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control 

of the individual’s country origin, or any other foreign country, 

only if the Secretary determines that— 

(1) actions that have been or are planned to be taken 

will substantially mitigate the risk of such individual engaging 

or reengaging in any terrorist or other hostile activity that 

threatens the United States or United States persons or 

interests; and 
H. R. 3304—181 

(2) the transfer is in the national security interest of the 

United States. 

(c) FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED IN MAKING DETERMINATION.— 

In making the determination specified in subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall specifically evaluate and take into consideration the following factors: 

(1) The recommendations of the Guantanamo Detainee 

Review Task Force established pursuant to Executive Order 

No. 13492 and the recommendations of the Periodic Review 

Boards established pursuant to No. Executive Order 13567, 

as applicable. 

(2) The security situation in the foreign country to which 

the individual is to be transferred, including whether or not 

the country is a state sponsor of terrorism, the presence of 

foreign terrorist groups, and the threat posed by such groups 

to the United States. 

(3) Any confirmed case in which an individual transferred 

to the foreign country to which the individual is to be transferred subsequently engaged in terrorist or other hostile activity 

that threatened the United States or United States persons 

or interests. 

(4) Any actions taken by the United States or the foreign 

country to which the individual is to be transferred, or change 

in circumstances in such country, that reduce the risk of reengagement of the type described in paragraph (3). 

(5) Any assurances provided by the government of the 

foreign country to which the individual is to be transferred, 

including that— 

(A) such government maintains control over any facility 

at which the individual is to be detained if the individual 

is to be housed in a government-controlled facility; and 

(B) such government has taken or agreed to take 

actions to substantially mitigate the risk of the individual 

engaging or reengaging in any terrorist or other hostile 

activity that threatens the United States or United States 

persons or interests. 

(6) An assessment of the capacity, willingness, and past 

practices (if applicable) of the foreign country described in 

paragraph (5) in meeting any assurances it has provided, 

including assurances under paragraph (5) regarding its capacity 

and willingness to mitigate the risk of reengagement. 

(7) Any record of cooperation by the individual to be transferred with United States intelligence and law enforcement 

authorities, pursuant to a pre-trial agreement, while in the 

custody of or under the effective control of the Department 

of Defense, and any agreements and effective mechanisms that 

may be in place, to the extent relevant and necessary, to 

provide continued cooperation with United States intelligence 

and law enforcement authorities. 

(8) In the case of an individual who has been tried in 

a court or competent tribunal of the United States having 

jurisdiction on charges based on the same conduct that serves 

as a basis for the determination that the individual is an 

enemy combatant, whether or not the individual has been 

acquitted of such charges or has been convicted and has completed serving the sentence pursuant to the conviction. 
H. R. 3304—182 

(d) NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall notify the 

appropriate committees of Congress of a determination of the Secretary under subsection (a) or (b) not later than 30 days before 

the transfer or release of the individual under such subsection. 

Each notification shall include, at a minimum, the following: 

(1) A detailed statement of the basis for the transfer or 

release. 

(2) An explanation of why the transfer or release is in 

the national security interests of the United States. 

(3) A description of any actions taken to mitigate the risks 

of reengagement by the individual to be transferred or released, 

including any actions taken to address factors relevant to a 

prior case of reengagement described in subsection (c)(3). 

(4) A copy of any Periodic Review Board findings relating 

to the individual. 

(5) A description of the evaluation conducted pursuant 

to subsection (c), including a summary of the assessment 

required by paragraph (6) of such subsection. 

(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Appropriations, 

and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; 

and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and 

the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

House of Representatives. 

(2) The term ‘‘individual detained at Guantanamo’’ means 

any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who— 

(A) is not a citizen of the United States or a member 

of the Armed Forces of the United States; and 

(B) is— 

(i) in the custody or under the control of the 

Department of Defense; or 

(ii) otherwise under detention at United States 

Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

(f) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITIES.—The following provisions of law are repealed: 

(1) Section 1028 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1567; 

10 U.S.C. 801 note). 

(2) Section 1028 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1914; 

10 U.S.C. 801 note). 

SEC. 1036. REPORT ON INFORMATION RELATING TO INDIVIDUALS 

DETAINED AT PARWAN, AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) CLASSIFIED REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a classified report 

on information relating to the individuals detained by the Department of Defense at the Detention Facility at Parwan, Afghanistan, 

pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public 

Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) who have been determined to 

represent an enduring security threat to the United States. Such 
H. R. 3304—183 

report shall cover any individual detained at such facility as of 

the date of the enactment of this Act. Such report shall include 

for each such covered individual— 

(1) a description of the relevant organization or organizations with which the individual is affiliated; 

(2) whether the individual had ever been in the custody 

or under the effective control of the United States at any 

time before being detained at such facility and, if so, where 

the individual had been in such custody or under such effective 

control; and 

(3) whether the individual has been directly linked to the 

death of any member of the United States Armed Forces or 

any United States Government employee. 

(b) DECLASSIFICATION REVIEW.—Upon submittal of the classified report required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense 

shall conduct a declassification review of such report to determine 

what information, if any, may be made publicly available in an 

unclassified summary of the information contained in the report. 

In conducting such declassification review, the Secretary shall make 

such summary information publicly available to the maximum 

extent practicable, consistent with national security. 

SEC. 1037. GRADE OF CHIEF PROSECUTOR AND CHIEF DEFENSE 

COUNSEL IN MILITARY COMMISSIONS ESTABLISHED TO 

TRY INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of any military commission 

established under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code, 

to try an alien unprivileged enemy belligerent (as such terms are 

defined in section 948a of such title) who is detained at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the chief defense 

counsel and the chief prosecutor shall have the same grade (as 

that term is defined in section 101(b)(7) of such title). 

(b) WAIVER.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may temporarily 

waive the requirement specified in subsection (a), if the Secretary determines that compliance with such subsection 

would— 

(A) be infeasible due to a non-availability of qualified 

officers of the same grade to fill the billets of chief defense 

counsel and chief prosecutor; or 

(B) cause a significant disruption to proceedings established under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code. 

(2) REPORTS.—Not later than 30 days after the Secretary 

issues a waiver under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit 

to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives the following: 

(A) A copy of the waiver and the determination of 

the Secretary to issue the waiver. 

(B) A statement of the basis for the determination, 

including an explanation of the non-availability of qualified 

officers or the significant disruption concerned. 

(C) Notice of the time period during which the waiver 

is in effect. 

(c) GUIDANCE.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance 

to ensure that the office of the chief defense counsel and the 

office of the chief prosecutor receive equitable resources, personnel 
H. R. 3304—184 

support, and logistical support for conducting their respective duties 

in connection with any military commission established under 

chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code, to try an alien 

unprivileged enemy belligerent (as such terms are defined in section 

948a of such title) who is detained at United States Naval Station, 

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

SEC. 1038. REPORT ON CAPABILITY OF YEMENI GOVERNMENT TO 

DETAIN, REHABILITATE, AND PROSECUTE INDIVIDUALS 

DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO WHO ARE TRANSFERRED TO 

YEMEN. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the 

Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the congressional defense 

committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 

Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 

Senate a report on the capability of the government of Yemen 

to detain, rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals detained at 

Guantanamo who are transferred to Yemen. Such report shall 

include an assessment of any humanitarian issues that may be 

encountered in transferring individuals detained at Guantanamo 

to Yemen. 

(b) INDIVIDUAL DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘individual detained at Guantanamo’’ has the 

meaning given such term in section 1035(e)(2). 

SEC. 1039. REPORT ON ATTACHMENT OF RIGHTS TO INDIVIDUALS 

DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO IF TRANSFERRED TO THE 

UNITED STATES. 

(a) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Attorney General, in consultation with 

the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees, the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate 

a report on the legal rights, if any, for which an individual detained 

at Guantanamo (as such term is defined in section 1035(e)(2)), 

if transferred to the United States, may become eligible, by reason 

of such transfer. 

(b) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—The report required by subsection 

(a) shall include each of the following: 

(1) An assessment of the extent to which an individual 

detained at Guantanamo, if transferred to the United States, 

could become eligible, by reason of such transfer, for— 

(A) relief from removal from the United States, 

including pursuant to the Convention against Torture and 

Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment; 

(B) any required release from immigration detention, 

including pursuant to the decision of the Supreme Court 

in Zadvydas v. Davis; 

(C) asylum or withholding of removal; or 

(D) any additional constitutional right. 

(2) For any right referred to in paragraph (1) for which 

the Attorney General determine such an individual could 

become eligible if so transferred, a description of the reasoning 

behind such determination and an explanation of the nature 

of the right. 
H. R. 3304—185 

(3) An analysis of the extent to which legislation or other 

steps could address any legal rights described in paragraph 

(1). 

Subtitle E—Sensitive Military Operations 

SEC. 1041. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE MILITARY 

OPERATIONS. 

(a) NOTIFICATION REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 3 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘§ 130f. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations 

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall promptly 

submit to the congressional defense committees notice in writing 

of any sensitive military operation conducted under this title following such operation. Department of Defense support to operations 

conducted under the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 

3001 et seq.) is addressed in the classified annex prepared to 

accompany the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2014. 

‘‘(b) PROCEDURES.—(1) The Secretary of Defense shall establish 

and submit to the congressional defense committees procedures 

for complying with the requirements of subsection (a) consistent 

with the national security of the United States and the protection 

of operational integrity. 

‘‘(2) The congressional defense committees shall ensure that 

committee procedures designed to protect from unauthorized disclosure classified information relating to national security of the 

United States are sufficient to protect the information that is submitted to the committees pursuant to this section. 

‘‘(c) BRIEFING REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

periodically brief the congressional defense committees on Department of Defense personnel and equipment assigned to sensitive 

military operations. 

‘‘(d) SENSITIVE MILITARY OPERATION DEFINED.—The term ‘sensitive military operation’ means a lethal operation or capture operation conducted by the armed forces outside the United States 

and outside a theater of major hostilities pursuant to— 

‘‘(1) the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public 

Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note); or 

‘‘(2) any other authority except— 

‘‘(A) a declaration of war; or 

‘‘(B) a specific statutory authorization for the use of 

force other than the authorization referred to in paragraph 

(1). 

‘‘(e) EXCEPTION.—The notification requirement under subsection 

(a) shall not apply with respect to a sensitive military operation 

executed within the territory of Afghanistan pursuant to the 

Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 

U.S.C. 1541 note). 

‘‘(f) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall 

be construed to provide any new authority or to alter or otherwise 

affect the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.), the 

Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 
H. R. 3304—186 

U.S.C. 1541 note), or any requirement under the National Security 

Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.).’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 

beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 

item relating to section 130e the following new item: 

‘‘130f. Congressional notification regarding sensitive military operations.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 130f of title 10, United States 

Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to any 

sensitive military operation (as defined in subsection (d) of such 

section) executed on or after the date of the enactment of this 

Act. 

(c) DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL OF PROCEDURES.—The Secretary 

of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees 

the procedures required under section 130f(b) of title 10, United 

States Code, as added by subsection (a), by not later than 60 

days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 1042. COUNTERTERRORISM OPERATIONAL BRIEFINGS. 

(a) BRIEFINGS REQUIRED.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 23 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended by inserting after section 484 the following 

new section: 

‘‘§ 485. Quarterly counterterrorism operations briefings 

‘‘(a) BRIEFINGS REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees quarterly briefings 

outlining Department of Defense counterterrorism operations and 

related activities. 

‘‘(b) ELEMENTS.—Each briefing under subsection (a) shall 

include each of the following: 

‘‘(1) A global update on activity within each geographic 

combatant command and how such activity supports the respective theater campaign plan. 

‘‘(2) An overview of authorities and legal issues, including 

limitations. 

‘‘(3) An overview of interagency activities and initiatives. 

‘‘(4) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 

beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 

item relating to section 484 the following new item: 

‘‘485. Quarterly counterterrorism operations briefings.’’. 

(b) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 1031 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 

Stat. 1570; 10 U.S.C. 167 note) is hereby repealed. 

SEC. 1043. REPORT ON PROCESS FOR DETERMINING TARGETS OF 

LETHAL OR CAPTURE OPERATIONS. 

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of 

this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 

defense committees a report containing an explanation of the legal 

and policy considerations and approval processes used in determining whether an individual or group of individuals could be 

the target of a lethal operation or capture operation conducted 

by the Armed Forces of the United States outside the United 

States and outside of Afghanistan. 
H. R. 3304—187 

Subtitle F—Nuclear Forces 

SEC. 1051. NOTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION OR CONSOLIDATION OF DUAL-CAPABLE AIRCRAFT BASED IN EUROPE. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that 

the President should not reduce or consolidate the basing of dualcapable aircraft of the United States that are based in Europe 

unless— 

(1) the President takes into account whether the Russian 

Federation has carried out similar reductions or consolidations 

with respect to dual-capable aircraft of Russia; 

(2) the Secretary of Defense has consulted with the member 

states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) with 

respect to the planned reduction or consolidation of dual-capable 

aircraft of the United States; and 

(3) there is a consensus among such member states that 

the nuclear posture of NATO is not adversely affected by such 

reduction or consolidation. 

(b) NOTIFICATION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 24 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended by inserting after section 497 the following 

new section: 

‘‘§ 497a. Notification required for reduction or consolidation 

of dual-capable aircraft based in Europe 

‘‘(a) NOTIFICATION.—Not less than 90 days before the date 

on which the Secretary of Defense reduces or consolidates the 

dual-capable aircraft of the United States that are based in Europe, 

the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees 

a notification of such planned reduction or consolidation, including 

the following: 

‘‘(1) The reasons for such planned reduction or consolidation. 

‘‘(2) Any effects of such planned reduction or consolidation 

on the extended deterrence mission of the United States. 

‘‘(3) The manner in which the military requirements of 

the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) will continue 

to be met in light of such planned reduction or consolidation. 

‘‘(4) A statement by the Secretary on the response of NATO 

to such planned reduction or consolidation. 

‘‘(5) Whether there is any change in the force posture 

of the Russian Federation as a result of such planned reduction 

or consolidation, including with respect to the nonstrategic 

nuclear weapons of Russia that are within range of the member 

states of NATO. 

‘‘(b) DUAL-CAPABLE AIRCRAFT DEFINED.—In this section, the 

term ‘dual-capable aircraft’ means aircraft that can perform both 

conventional and nuclear missions.’’. 
H. R. 3304—188 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 

beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 

item relating to section 497 the following new item: 

‘‘497a. Notification required for reduction or consolidation of dual-capable aircraft 

based in Europe.’’. 

SEC. 1052. COUNCIL ON OVERSIGHT OF THE NATIONAL LEADERSHIP 

COMMAND, CONTROL, AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 7 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by inserting after section 171 the following new 

section: 

‘‘§ 171a. Council on Oversight of the National Leadership 

Command, Control, and Communications System 

‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is within the Department of 

Defense a council to be known as the ‘Council on Oversight of 

the National Leadership Command, Control, and Communications 

System’ (in this section referred to as the ‘Council’). 

‘‘(b) MEMBERSHIP.—The members of the Council shall be as 

follows: 

‘‘(1) The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. 

‘‘(2) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. 

‘‘(3) The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 

‘‘(4) The Commander of the United States Strategic Command. 

‘‘(5) The Director of the National Security Agency. 

‘‘(6) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of 

Defense. 

‘‘(7) Such other officers of the Department of Defense as 

the Secretary may designate. 

‘‘(c) CO-CHAIR.—The Council shall be co-chaired by the Under 

Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and 

the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 

‘‘(d) RESPONSIBILITIES.—(1) The Council shall be responsible 

for oversight of the command, control, and communications system 

for the national leadership of the United States, including nuclear 

command, control, and communications. 

‘‘(2) In carrying out the responsibility for oversight of the command, control, and communications system as specified in paragraph (1), the Council shall be responsible for the following: 

‘‘(A) Oversight of performance assessments (including interoperability). 

‘‘(B) Vulnerability identification and mitigation. 

‘‘(C) Architecture development. 

‘‘(D) Resource prioritization. 

‘‘(E) Such other responsibilities as the Secretary of Defense 

shall specify for purposes of this section. 

‘‘(e) ANNUAL REPORTS.—At the same time each year that the 

budget of the President is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 

1105(a) of title 31, the Council shall submit to the congressional 

defense committees a report on the activities of the Council. Each 

report shall include the following: 

‘‘(1) A description and assessment of the activities of the 

Council during the previous fiscal year. 
H. R. 3304—189 

‘‘(2) A description of the activities proposed to be undertaken by the Council during the period covered by the current 

future-years defense program under section 221 of this title. 

‘‘(3) Any changes to the requirements of the command, 

control, and communications system for the national leadership 

of the United States made during the previous year, along 

with an explanation for why the changes were made and a 

description of the effects of the changes to the capability of 

the system. 

‘‘(4) A breakdown of each program element in such budget 

that relates to the system, including how such program element 

relates to the operation and sustainment, research and development, procurement, or other activity of the system. 

‘‘(f) BUDGET AND FUNDING MATTERS.—(1) Not later than 30 

days after the President submits to Congress the budget for a 

fiscal year under section 1105(a) of title 31, the Commander of 

the United States Strategic Command shall submit to the Chairman 

of the Joint Chiefs of Staff an assessment of— 

‘‘(A) whether such budget allows the Federal Government 

to meet the required capabilities of the command, control, and 

communications system for the national leadership of the 

United States during the fiscal year covered by the budget 

and the four subsequent fiscal years; and 

‘‘(B) if the Commander determines that such budget does 

not allow the Federal Government to meet such required 

capabilities, a description of the steps being taken to meet 

such required capabilities. 

‘‘(2) Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff receives the assessment of the 

Commander of the United States Strategic Command under paragraph (1), the Chairman shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees— 

‘‘(A) such assessment as it was submitted to the Chairman; 

and 

‘‘(B) any comments of the Chairman. 

‘‘(3) If a House of Congress adopts a bill authorizing or appropriating funds for the activities of the command, control, and 

communications system for the national leadership of the United 

States that, as determined by the Council, provides insufficient 

funds for such activities for the period covered by such bill, the 

Council shall notify the congressional defense committees of the 

determination. 

‘‘(g) NOTIFICATION OF ANOMALIES.—(1) The Secretary of Defense 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees written 

notification of an anomaly in the nuclear command, control, and 

communications system for the national leadership of the United 

States that is reported to the Secretary or the Council by not 

later than 14 days after the date on which the Secretary or the 

Council learns of such anomaly, as the case may be. 

‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘anomaly’ means any 

unplanned, irregular, or abnormal event, whether unexplained or 

caused intentionally or unintentionally by a person or a system. 

‘‘(h) NATIONAL LEADERSHIP OF THE UNITED STATES DEFINED.— 

In this section, the term ‘national leadership of the United States’ 

means the following: 

‘‘(1) The President. 

‘‘(2) The Vice President. 
H. R. 3304—190 

‘‘(3) Such other civilian officials of the United States 

Government as the President shall designate for purposes of 

this section.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 

beginning of chapter 7 of such title is amended by inserting 

after the item relating to section 171 the following new item: 

‘‘171a. Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and 

Communications System.’’. 

(3) REPORT ON ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 60 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees 

a report on the Council on Oversight of the National Leadership 

Command, Control, and Communications System established 

by section 171a of title 10, United States Code, as added by 

paragraph (1), including the following: 

(A) The charter and organizational structure of the 

Council. 

(B) Such recommendations for legislative action as the 

Secretary considers appropriate to improve the authorities 

relating to the Council. 

(C) A funding plan over the period of the current 

future-years defense program under section 221 of title 

10, United States Code, to ensure a robust and modern 

nuclear command, control, and communications capability. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 491 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking subsection (c); and 

(2) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c). 

SEC. 1053. MODIFICATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES AND REPORTING 

REQUIREMENTS OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS COUNCIL. 

(a) RESPONSIBILITIES.—Subsection (d) of section 179 of title 

10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking paragraph (10); and 

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (11) and (12) as paragraphs 

(10) and (11), respectively. 

(b) ANNUAL REPORT.—Subsection (g) of such section is amended 

by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(6) A description and assessment of the joint efforts of 

the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy to develop 

common security practices that improve the security of the 

nuclear weapons and facilities of the Department of Defense 

and the Department of Energy.’’. 

(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Such subsection (g) is further 

amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘on 

the following’’ and inserting ‘‘that includes the following’’. 

SEC. 1054. MODIFICATION OF DEADLINE FOR REPORT ON PLAN FOR 

NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE, NUCLEAR WEAPONS 

COMPLEX, NUCLEAR WEAPONS DELIVERY SYSTEMS, AND 

NUCLEAR WEAPONS COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM. 

Section 1043(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1576) is amended— 

(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘ON THE PLAN’’ 

and all that follows through ‘‘CONTROL SYSTEM’’ and inserting 

‘‘REQUIRED’’; 
H. R. 3304—191 

(2) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Together with the budget 

of the President submitted to Congress’’ and inserting ‘‘Not 

later than 30 days after the submission to Congress of the 

budget of the President’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(4) EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR REPORT.— 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraph (B), if the 

Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy jointly 

determine that a report required by paragraph (1) for a 

fiscal year will not be able to be transmitted to the committees specified in that paragraph by the time required under 

that paragraph, such Secretaries shall— 

‘‘(i) promptly, and before the submission to Congress of the budget of the President for that fiscal 

year under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States 

Code, notify those committees of the expected date 

for the transmission of the report; and 

‘‘(ii) not later than 30 days after the submission 

of that budget to Congress, provide a briefing to those 

committees on the content of the report. 

‘‘(B) LIMITATION.—In no case may the President 

transmit a report required by paragraph (1) for a fiscal 

year to the committees specified in that paragraph later 

than 60 days after the submission to Congress of the budget 

of the President for that fiscal year.’’. 

SEC. 1055. PROHIBITION ON ELIMINATION OF NUCLEAR TRIAD. 

(a) PROHIBITION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 

2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended 

to reduce, convert, or decommission any strategic delivery system 

if such reduction, conversion, or decommissioning would eliminate 

a leg of the nuclear triad. 

(b) NUCLEAR TRIAD DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘nuclear 

triad’’ means the nuclear deterrent capabilities of the United States 

composed of the following: 

(1) Land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles. 

(2) Submarine-launched ballistic missiles and associated 

ballistic missile submarines. 

(3) Nuclear-certified strategic bombers. 

SEC. 1056. IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW START TREATY. 

(a) IMPLEMENTATION.— 

(1) FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACTIVITIES.—With respect to reductions to the nuclear forces of the United States necessary to 

meet the New START Treaty levels, the Secretary of Defense 

may only use funds authorized to be appropriated by this 

Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 to carry 

out activities to prepare for such reductions. Subject to the 

limitation in subsection (b), such activities may include the 

preparation of any documents needed to support an environmental assessment process under the National Environmental 

Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) that may be required 

to support such reductions. 

(2) CONSOLIDATED BUDGET DISPLAY.—The Secretary shall 

include with the defense budget materials for each fiscal year 

specified in paragraph (3) a consolidated budget justification 
H. R. 3304—192 

display that individually covers each program and activity associated with the implementation of the New START Treaty 

for the period covered by the future-years defense program 

submitted under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, 

at or about the time as such defense budget materials are 

submitted. 

(3) FISCAL YEAR SPECIFIED.—A fiscal year specified in this 

paragraph is each fiscal year that occurs during the period 

beginning with fiscal year 2015 and ending on the date on 

which the New START Treaty is no longer in force. 

(b) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 

by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for 

environmental assessment activities to support reductions to the 

nuclear forces of the United States, not more than 50 percent 

may be obligated or expended until— 

(1) the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress the plan 

required by subsection (a) of section 1042 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 

112–81; 125 Stat. 1575), including a description of various 

options for the nuclear force structure of the United States 

under the New START Treaty, including the preferred force 

structure option of the Secretary (such plan and options may 

be subject to modification based on the results of the environmental assessment and other subsequent developments); 

(2) the Commander of the United States Strategic Command submits to the congressional defense committees a report 

providing the assessment of the Commander with respect to 

the options contained in the plan described in paragraph (1), 

including the preferred force structure option of the Secretary; 

and 

(3) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certifies to 

the congressional defense committees that conducting such 

environmental assessment activities will not imperil the ability 

of the military to comply with the New START Treaty levels 

by February 2018. 

(c) MODIFICATION OF LIMITATION ON RETIREMENT OF B–52 AIR- CRAFT.— (1) COMMON CONVENTIONAL CAPABILITY CONFIGURATION.— Subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 131 of the John Warner National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 

109–364; 120 Stat. 2111), as added by section 137(a)(1)(C) 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 

(Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 32), is amended by striking 

‘‘common capability configuration’’ and inserting ‘‘common 

conventional capability configuration’’. 

(2) CONVERSION.—Notwithstanding such section 131 or any 

other provision of law, the Secretary of Defense may not convert 

a B–52 aircraft described in subsection (a)(1)(C) of such section 

131 to a configuration that does not allow the aircraft to perform 

nuclear missions unless the Secretary has submitted to Congress the information required under subsection (b). 

(d) REPORT ON COLLABORATION AMONG THE STRATEGIC FORCES

OF THE ARMED FORCES.— 

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than one year after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 

on collaboration among the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force 
H. R. 3304—193 

on activities related to strategic systems to provide efficiencies, 

improve technology sharing, and yield other potential benefits. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall 

include the following: 

(A) A description of current collaboration among the 

Army, the Navy, and the Air Force on strategic system 

programs, including strategic missiles systems, conventional prompt global strike, and other strategic forces as 

the Secretary determines appropriate. 

(B) A description and assessment of any additional 

opportunities for such collaboration, including the benefits 

that may be realized by such efforts, the risks and costs 

to existing programs, and potential effects on the defense 

industrial base that supports strategic systems. 

(e) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) the successful implementation of the New START 

Treaty requires the partnership of the President and Congress; 

(2) the force structure required by the New START Treaty 

should preserve Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile 

silos that contain a deployed missile as of the date of the 

enactment of this Act in, at a minimum, a warm status that 

enables such silo to be made fully operational with a deployed 

missile and remain a fully functioning element of the interconnected and redundant command and control system of the 

missile field; and 

(3) the distribution of any such warm-status silos should 

not disproportionally affect the force structure of any one operational intercontinental ballistic missile wing. 

(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘defense budget materials’’ has the meaning 

given that term in section 231(f) of title 10, United States 

Code. 

(2) The term ‘‘New START Treaty’’ means the Treaty 

between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation 

of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, and 

entered into force on February 5, 2011. 

SEC. 1057. RETENTION OF CAPABILITY TO REDEPLOY MULTIPLE 

INDEPENDENTLY TARGETABLE REENTRY VEHICLES. 

(a) DEPLOYMENT CAPABILITY.—The Secretary of the Air Force 

shall ensure that the Air Force is capable of— 

(1) deploying multiple independently targetable reentry 

vehicles to Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles; 

and 

(2) commencing such deployment not later than 180 days 

after the date on which the President determines such deployment necessary. 

(b) WARHEAD CAPABILITY.—The Nuclear Weapons Council 

established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code, shall 

ensure that— 

(1) the nuclear weapons stockpile contains a sufficient 

number of nuclear warheads that are capable of being deployed 

as multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles with 

respect to Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles; 

and 
H. R. 3304—194 

(2) such deployment is capable of being commenced not 

later than 180 days after the date on which the President 

determines such deployment necessary. 

SEC. 1058. REPORT ON NEW START TREATY. 

Not later than January 15, 2014, the Secretary of Defense 

and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly submit 

to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on 

Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on whether the New 

START Treaty (as defined in section 494(a)(2)(D)(ii) of title 10, 

United States Code) is in the national security interests of the 

United States. 

SEC. 1059. REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS 

OF THE PALOMARES NUCLEAR WEAPONS ACCIDENT 

REVISED DOSE EVALUATION REPORT. 

Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of 

this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the implementation of the recommendations of 

the Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation 

Report released by the Air Force in April 2001. 

SEC. 1060. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON FURTHER STRATEGIC NUCLEAR 

ARMS REDUCTIONS WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—It is the sense of Congress that, if the United 

States seeks further strategic nuclear arms reductions with the 

Russian Federation that are below the levels of the New START 

Treaty, such reductions should— 

(1) be pursued through a mutually negotiated agreement 

with Russia; 

(2) be verifiable; 

(3) be made pursuant to the treaty-making power of the 

President as set forth in Article II, section 2, clause 2 of 

the Constitution; and 

(4) take into account the full range of nuclear weapon 

capabilities that threaten the United States and the forwarddeployed forces and allies of the United States, including such 

capabilities relating to nonstrategic nuclear weapons. 

(b) NEW START TREATY DEFINED.—The term ‘‘New START 

Treaty’’ means the Treaty between the United States of America 

and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction 

and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 

2010, and entered into force on February 5, 2011. 

SEC. 1061. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COMPLIANCE WITH NUCLEAR 

ARMS CONTROL TREATY OBLIGATIONS. 

It is the sense of Congress that, if the President determines 

that a foreign nation is in substantial noncompliance with its obligations under a nuclear arms control treaty to which the United 

States is a party in a manner that adversely affects the national 

security of the United States or its allies or alliances, the President 

should— 

(1) conduct an assessment of the effect of such noncompliance on the national security interests of the United States 

and its allies; 
H. R. 3304—195 

(2) determine what further actions are warranted by the 

United States in response to such noncompliance; 

(3) determine whether such noncompliance threatens the 

viability of such treaty; 

(4) take appropriate steps to resolve the noncompliance 

issue; 

(5) keep Congress informed of developments relating to 

such noncompliance issue; 

(6) inform Congress of the assessment and plan of the 

President to resolve such noncompliance issue, including any 

plans to address the issue diplomatically with the government 

of the noncompliant nation and the affected allies and alliances; 

(7) consider if the United States should, in light of such 

noncompliance, engage in future nuclear arms control negotiations with the government of the noncompliant nation; and 

(8) consider the potential effect of such noncompliance on 

the consideration by the Senate of a future nuclear arms reduction treaty involving the government of the noncompliant 

nation. 

SEC. 1062. SENSES OF CONGRESS ON ENSURING THE MODERNIZATION 

OF THE NUCLEAR FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES. 

(a) POLICY.—It is the policy of the United States to— 

(1) modernize or replace the triad of strategic nuclear 

delivery systems; 

(2) proceed with a robust stockpile stewardship program; 

(3) maintain and modernize the nuclear weapons production capabilities that will ensure the safety, security, reliability, 

and performance of the nuclear forces of the United States 

at the levels required by the New START Treaty; and 

(4) underpin deterrence by meeting the requirements for 

hedging against possible international developments or technical problems, in accordance with the policies of the United 

States. 

(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MODERNIZATION OF NUCLEAR

FORCES.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) Congress is committed to providing the resources needed 

to achieve the objectives stated in subsection (a) at a minimum 

at the level set forth in the 10-year plan provided to Congress 

on an annual basis pursuant to section 1043 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 

112–81; 125 Stat. 1576), as amended; 

(2) Congress supports the modernization or replacement 

of the triad of strategic nuclear delivery systems consisting 

of— 

(A) a heavy bomber and air-launched cruise missile; 

(B) an intercontinental ballistic missile; and 

(C) a ballistic missile submarine and submarinelaunched ballistic missile; and 

(3) the President and Congress should work together to 

meet the objectives stated in subsection (a) in the most costefficient manner possible. 

(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS ON LONG-RANGE STRIKE BOMBER AIR- CRAFT.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) advancements in air-to-air and surface-to-air weapons 

systems by foreign powers will require increasingly sophisticated long-range strike capabilities; 
H. R. 3304—196 

(2) upgrading the existing bomber aircraft fleet of the 

United States consisting of B–1B, B–2, and B–52 bomber aircraft must remain a high budget priority in order to maintain 

the combat effectiveness of such fleet; and 

(3) the Air Force should continue to prioritize development 

and acquisition of the long-range strike bomber program. 

Subtitle G—Miscellaneous Authorities and 

Limitations 

SEC. 1071. ENHANCEMENT OF CAPACITY OF THE UNITED STATES 

GOVERNMENT TO ANALYZE CAPTURED RECORDS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 21 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by inserting after section 426 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 427. Conflict Records Research Center 

‘‘(a) CENTER AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Defense may establish a center to be known as the ‘Conflict Records Research Center’ 

(in this section referred to as the ‘Center’). 

‘‘(b) PURPOSES.—The purposes of the Center shall be the following: 

‘‘(1) To establish a digital research database, including 

translations, and to facilitate research and analysis of records 

captured from countries, organizations, and individuals, now 

or once hostile to the United States, with rigid adherence 

to academic freedom and integrity. 

‘‘(2) Consistent with the protection of national security 

information, personally identifiable information, and intelligence sources and methods, to make a significant portion 

of these records available to researchers as quickly and responsibly as possible while taking into account the integrity of 

the academic process and risks to innocents or third parties. 

‘‘(3) To conduct and disseminate research and analysis 

to increase the understanding of factors related to international 

relations, counterterrorism, and conventional and unconventional warfare and, ultimately, enhance national security. 

‘‘(4) To collaborate with members of academic and broad 

national security communities, both domestic and international, 

on research, conferences, seminars, and other information 

exchanges to identify topics of importance for the leadership 

of the United States Government and the scholarly community. 

‘‘(c) CONCURRENCE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE.—The Secretary of Defense shall seek the concurrence 

of the Director of National Intelligence to the extent the efforts 

and activities of the Center involve the entities referred to in 

subsection (b)(4). 

‘‘(d) SUPPORT FROM OTHER UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

DEPARTMENTS OR AGENCIES.—The head of any non-Department 

of Defense department or agency of the United States Government 

may— 

‘‘(1) provide to the Secretary of Defense services, including 

personnel support, to support the operations of the Center; 

and 

‘‘(2) transfer funds to the Secretary of Defense to support 

the operations of the Center. 
H. R. 3304—197 

‘‘(e) ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS AND DONATIONS.—(1) Subject to 

paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense may accept from any source 

specified in paragraph (2) any gift or donation for purposes of 

defraying the costs or enhancing the operations of the Center. 

‘‘(2) The sources specified in this paragraph are the following: 

‘‘(A) The government of a State or a political subdivision 

of a State. 

‘‘(B) The government of a foreign country. 

‘‘(C) A foundation or other charitable organization, 

including a foundation or charitable organization that is organized or operates under the laws of a foreign country. 

‘‘(D) Any source in the private sector of the United States 

or a foreign country. 

‘‘(3) The Secretary may not accept a gift or donation under 

this subsection if acceptance of the gift or donation would compromise or appear to compromise— 

‘‘(A) the ability of the Department of Defense, any employee 

of the Department, or any member of the armed forces to 

carry out the responsibility or duty of the Department in a 

fair and objective manner; or 

‘‘(B) the integrity of any program of the Department or 

of any person involved in such a program. 

‘‘(4) The Secretary shall provide written guidance setting forth 

the criteria to be used in determining the applicability of paragraph 

(3) to any proposed gift or donation under this subsection. 

‘‘(f) CREDITING OF FUNDS TRANSFERRED OR ACCEPTED.—Funds 

transferred to or accepted by the Secretary of Defense under this 

section shall be credited to appropriations available to the Department of Defense for the Center, and shall be available for the 

same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, 

as the appropriations with which merged. Any funds so transferred 

or accepted shall remain available until expended. 

‘‘(g) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘captured record’ means a document, audio 

file, video file, or other material captured during combat operations from countries, organizations, or individuals, now or 

once hostile to the United States. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘gift or donation’ means any gift or donation 

of funds, materials (including research materials), real or personal property, or services (including lecture services and faculty services).’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of such chapter is amended by inserting after 

the item relating to section 426 the following new item: 

‘‘427. Conflict Records Research Center.’’. 

SEC. 1072. STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 488 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘other year, and in time for submission 

to Congress under subsection (b),’’ and inserting ‘‘three 

years’’; 

(B) by inserting after ‘‘Secretary of Defense’’ the following: ‘‘, in consultation with the Director of National 

Intelligence and the Secretary of Commerce,’’; 
H. R. 3304—198 

(C) by striking ‘‘the mission of the Department of 

Defense.’’ and inserting ‘‘the national security of the United 

States. Each such strategic plan shall include each of the 

following:’’; and 

(D) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(1) An inventory of the uses of the electromagnetic spectrum for national security purposes and other purposes. 

‘‘(2) An estimate of the need for electromagnetic spectrum 

for national security and other purposes over each of the periods 

specified in subsection (b). 

‘‘(3) Any other matters that the Secretary of Defense, in 

consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and 

the Secretary of Commerce, considers appropriate for the strategic plan.’’; 

(2) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c) and 

inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): 

‘‘(b) PERIODS COVERED BY STRATEGIC PLAN.—Each strategic 

plan prepared under subsection (a) shall cover each of the following 

periods (counting from the date of the issuance of the plan): 

‘‘(1) Zero to five years. 

‘‘(2) Five to ten years. 

‘‘(3) Ten to thirty years.’’; 

(3) in subsection (c), as so redesignated— 

(A) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) The 

Secretary’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) Each strategic plan submitted under paragraph (1) shall 

be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 

annex.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— (1) HEADING.—The section heading for section 488 of title 

10, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘: biennial 

strategic plan’’. 

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended by striking the 

item relating to section 488 and inserting the following new 

item: 

‘‘488. Management of electromagnetic spectrum.’’. 

SEC. 1073. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE MILITARY 

TRANSPORTATION SERVICES TO CERTAIN OTHER AGENCIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REIMBURSEMENT RATE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 2642 of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘airlift’’ each place it appears and inserting 

‘‘transportation’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (3)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘October 28, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2019’’; 

(B) by inserting and ‘‘military transportation services 

provided in support of foreign military sales’’ after ‘‘Department of Defense’’; and 

(C) by striking ‘‘air industry’’ and inserting ‘‘transportation industry’’. 

(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—The heading for such section is 

amended by striking ‘‘Airlift’’ and inserting ‘‘Transportation’’. 
H. R. 3304—199 

(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 157 of such title is amended by striking the item 

relating to section 2642 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘2642. Transportation services provided to certain other agencies: use of Department 

of Defense reimbursement rates.’’. 

SEC. 1074. NOTIFICATION OF MODIFICATIONS TO ARMY FORCE STRUCTURE. 

(a) CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE.—The Secretary of the Army shall certify to the congressional defense committees that Army force structure modifications, reductions, and additions authorized as of the date of the enactment of this Act that 

will utilize funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 

otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department 

of the Army are compliant with the provisions of the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 

(b) NOTIFICATION OF NECESSARY ASSESSMENTS OR STUDIES.— The Secretary of the Army, when making a congressional notification in accordance with section 993 of title 10, United States Code, 

shall include the Secretary’s assessment of whether or not the 

changes covered by the notification require an Environmental 

Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with 

the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 

et seq.), and, if an assessment or study is required, the plan for 

conducting such assessment or study. 

SEC. 1075. AIRCRAFT JOINT TRAINING. 

(a) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT JOINT TRAINING AND USAGE PLAN.— (1) METHODS.—The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary 

of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the Federal 

Aviation Administration shall jointly develop and implement 

plans and procedures to review the potential of joint testing 

and evaluation of unmanned aircraft equipment and systems 

with other appropriate departments and agencies of the Federal 

Government that may serve the dual purpose of providing 

capabilities to the Department of Defense to meet the future 

requirements of combatant commanders and domestically to 

strengthen international border security. 

(2) REPORT.—Not later than 270 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the 

Federal Aviation Administration shall jointly submit to Congress a report on the status of the development of the plans 

and procedures required under paragraph (1), including a costbenefit analysis of the shared expenses between the Department of Defense and other appropriate departments and agencies of the Federal Government to support such plans. 

(b) AIRCRAFT SIMULATOR TRAINING.—It is the sense of Congress 

that— 

(1) the use of aircraft simulators offers cost savings and 

provides members of the Armed Forces cost-effective preparation for combat; and 

(2) existing synergies between the Department of Defense 

and entities in the private sector should be maintained and 

cultivated to provide members of the Armed Forces with the 

most cost-effective aircraft simulation capabilities possible. 
H. R. 3304—200 

Subtitle H—Studies and Reports 

SEC. 1081. ONLINE AVAILABILITY OF REPORTS SUBMITTED TO CONGRESS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 122a of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—To the maximum extent practicable, on or 

after the date on which each report described in subsection (b) 

is submitted to Congress, the Secretary of Defense, acting through 

the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs, 

shall ensure that the report is made available to the public by— 

‘‘(1) posting the report on a publicly accessible Internet 

website of the Department of Defense; and 

‘‘(2) upon request, transmitting the report by other means, 

as long as such transmission is at no cost to the Department.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 

shall apply with respect to reports submitted to Congress after 

the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 1082. OVERSIGHT OF COMBAT SUPPORT AGENCIES. 

Section 193(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by inserting ‘‘and the 

congressional defense committees’’ after ‘‘the Secretary of Defense’’. 

SEC. 1083. INCLUSION IN ANNUAL REPORT OF DESCRIPTION OF INTERAGENCY COORDINATION RELATING TO HUMANITARIAN 

DEMINING TECHNOLOGY. 

Section 407(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period and inserting 

‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(5) a description of interagency efforts to coordinate and 

improve research, development, test, and evaluation for 

humanitarian demining technology and mechanical clearance 

methods, including the transfer of relevant counter-improvised 

explosive device technology with potential humanitarian 

demining applications.’’. 

SEC. 1084. REPEAL AND MODIFICATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

(a) TITLE 10, UNITED STATES CODE.—Title 10, United States 

Code, is amended as follows: 

(1)(A) Section 483 is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 

is amended by striking the item relating to section 483. 

(2) Section 2216 is amended— 

(A) by striking subsection (i); and 

(B) by redesignating subsections (j) and (k) as subsections (i) and (j), respectively. 

(3) Section 2885(a)(3) is amended by striking ‘‘If a project’’ 

and inserting ‘‘In the case of a project for new construction, 

if the project’’. 

(b) ANNUAL NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACTS.— 

(1) FISCAL YEAR 2009.—Section 903(b)(5) of the Duncan 

Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 2228 note), as amended 
H. R. 3304—201 

by section 334, is further amended by striking subparagraph 

(A), as designated by such section, and inserting the following 

new subparagraph (A): 

‘‘(A) Not later than December 31 of each year, the corrosion 

control and prevention executive of a military department shall 

submit to the Secretary of Defense a report containing recommendations pertaining to the corrosion control and prevention program 

of the military department. Such report shall include recommendations for the funding levels necessary for the executive to carry 

out the duties of the executive under this section.’’. 

(2) FISCAL YEAR 2008.—The National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended 

as follows: 

(A) Section 1074(b)(6) (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is 

amended— 

(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Except as provided in subparagraph 

(D), the Secretary’’; and 

(ii) by adding at the end the following new 

subparagraph: 

‘‘(D) EXCEPTIONS.—Subparagraph (A) does not apply 

to determinations made with respect to the following 

individuals: 

‘‘(i) An individual described in paragraph (2)(C) 

who is otherwise sponsored by the Secretary of 

Defense, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or the Vice Chairman 

of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 

‘‘(ii) An individual described in paragraph (2)(E).’’. 

(B) Section 2864 (10 U.S.C. 2911 note) is repealed. 

(3) FISCAL YEAR 2007.—Section 226 of the John Warner 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public 

Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2131) is repealed. 

SEC. 1085. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR COMPTROLLER GENERAL 

ASSESSMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EFFICIENCIES. 

Section 1054 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1582) is repealed. 

SEC. 1086. REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF UNITED STATES SPECIAL 

OPERATIONS FORCES AND UNITED STATES SPECIAL 

OPERATIONS COMMAND. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a 

review of the United States Special Operations Forces organization, 

capabilities, structure, and oversight. 

(b) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees a report on the review conducted under subsection (a). Such report shall include an analysis 

and, where appropriate, an assessment of the adequacy of each 

of the following: 

(1) The organizational structure of the United States Special Operations Command and each subordinate component, 

as in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(2) The policy and civilian oversight structures for Special 

Operations Forces within the Department of Defense, as in 

effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act, including 
H. R. 3304—202 

the statutory structures and responsibilities of the Office of 

the Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict and the alignment of resources, including human 

capital, with regard to such responsibilities within the Department. 

(3) The roles and responsibilities of United States Special 

Operations Command and Special Operations Forces under section 167 of title 10, United States Code. 

(4) Current and future special operations peculiar requirements of the commanders of the geographic combatant commands and Theater Special Operations Commands. 

(5) Command relationships between United States Special 

Operations Command, its subordinate component commands, 

and the geographic combatant commands. 

(6) The funding authorities, uses, acquisition processes, 

and civilian oversight mechanisms of Major Force Program– 

11. 

(7) Changes to structure, authorities, acquisition processes, 

oversight mechanisms, Major Force Program–11 funding, roles, 

and responsibilities assumed in the 2014 Quadrennial Defense 

Review. 

(8) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense determines 

are appropriate to ensure a comprehensive review and assessment. 

(c) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date on 

which the report required by subsection (b) is submitted, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a review of the report. Such review 

shall include an assessment of— 

(1) United States Special Operations Forces organization, 

force structure, capabilities, authorities, acquisition processes, 

and civilian oversight mechanisms; 

(2) how the special operations force structure is aligned 

with conventional force structures and national military strategies; and 

(3) any other matters the Comptroller General determines 

are relevant. 

SEC. 1087. REPORTS ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS. 

(a) REPORT ON COLLABORATION, DEMONSTRATION, AND USE

CASES AND DATA SHARING.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the 

Secretary of Transportation, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, on behalf of the UAS Executive 

Committee, shall submit jointly to the appropriate congressional 

committees a report setting forth the following: 

(1) The collaboration, demonstrations, and initial fielding 

of unmanned aircraft systems at test sites within and outside 

of restricted airspace. 

(2) The progress being made to develop public and civil 

sense-and-avoid and command-and-control technology. 

(3) An assessment on the sharing of operational, programmatic, and research data relating to unmanned aircraft 

systems operations by the Federal Aviation Administration, 

the Department of Defense, and the National Aeronautics and 
H. R. 3304—203 

Space Administration to help the Federal Aviation Administration establish civil unmanned aircraft systems certification 

standards, pilot certification and licensing, and air traffic control procedures, including identifying the locations selected to 

collect, analyze, and store the data. 

(b) REPORT ON RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS NEEDED FOR

UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS DESCRIBED IN THE 5-YEAR

ROADMAP.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 

of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, on behalf of the UAS Executive 

Committee, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report setting forth the resource requirements needed to 

meet the milestones for unmanned aircraft systems integration 

described in the 5-year roadmap under section 332(a)(5) of the 

FAA Modernization and Reform Act (Public Law 112–95; 49 U.S.C. 

40101 note). 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Commerce, Science and Transportation, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on 

Science, Space, and Technology, and the Committee on 

Appropriations of the House of Representatives. 

(2) The term ‘‘UAS Executive Committee’’ means the 

Department of Defense-Federal Aviation Administration executive committee described in section 1036(b) of the Duncan 

Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4596) established by the 

Secretary of Defense and the Administrator of the Federal 

Aviation Administration. 

SEC. 1088. REPORT ON FOREIGN LANGUAGE SUPPORT CONTRACTS 

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an 

assessment of the current approach of the Department of Defense 

to managing foreign language support contracts for the Department. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall 

include each of the following: 

(1) A description and analysis of the spending by the 

Department on all types of foreign language support services 

and products acquired by the components of the Department. 

(2) An assessment, in light of the analysis under paragraph 

(1), of whether any adjustment is needed in the management 

of foreign language support contracts for the Department in 

order to obtain efficiencies in contracts for all types of foreign 

language support for the Department. 

SEC. 1089. CIVIL AIR PATROL. 

(a) REPORT.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees a report on the Civil Air 

Patrol fleet. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall 

include the following: 
H. R. 3304—204 

(1) An assessment of whether the current number of aircraft, operating locations, and types of aircraft in the Civil 

Air Patrol fleet are suitable for each of the following: 

(A) Emergency missions in support of the Air Force, 

the Federal Emergency Management Agency, State and 

local governments, and others. 

(B) Other operational missions in support of the Air 

Force, other Federal agencies, State and local governments, 

and others. 

(C) Flight proficiency, flight training, and operational 

mission training and support for cadet orientation and 

cadet flight training programs in every State Civil Air 

Patrol wing. 

(2) An assessment of the ideal overall size of the Civil 

Air Patrol aircraft fleet, including a description of the factors 

used in determining that size. 

(3) An assessment of the process used by the Civil Air 

Patrol and the Air Force to determine aircraft operating locations, and whether State wing commanders are appropriately 

involved in that process. 

(4) An assessment of the process used by the Civil Air 

Patrol, the Air Force, the Federal Emergency Management 

Agency, and others to determine the type of aircraft and number 

of aircraft to be needed to support emergency, operational, 

and training missions. 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

SEC. 1091. TECHNICAL AND CLERICAL AMENDMENTS. 

(a) TITLE 10.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as 

follows: 

(1) The table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A, 

and at the beginning of part I of such subtitle, are each 

amended by striking the item relating to chapter 24 and 

inserting the following: 

‘‘24. Nuclear Posture .......................................................................................... 491’’. 

(2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 

is amended by striking the item relating to section 130e and 

inserting the following new item: 

‘‘130e. Treatment under Freedom of Information Act of critical infrastructure security information.’’. 

(3) Section 179(a)(5) is amended by striking ‘‘commander’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Commander’’. 

(4) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 9 

is amended by striking the item relating to section 231 and 

inserting the following new item: 

‘‘231. Budgeting for construction of naval vessels: annual plan and certification.’’. 

(5) Section 231a(a) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year 

of Defense’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense’’. 

(6) Chapter 24 is amended by adding a period at the 

end of the enumerator of section 498. 

(7) Section 494(c) is amended by striking ‘‘the date of 

the enactment of this Act’’ each place it appears and inserting 

‘‘December 31, 2011’’. 
H. R. 3304—205 

(8) Section 673(a) is amended by inserting ‘‘of the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice’’ after ‘‘120c’’. 

(9) Section 1401a is amended by striking ‘‘before the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2008’’ in subsections (d) and (e) and inserting ‘‘before January 

28, 2008’’. 

(10) Section 2359b(k)(4)(B) is amended by adding a period 

at the end. 

(11) Section 2461(a)(5)(E)(i) is amended by striking ‘‘the 

a’’ and inserting ‘‘the’’. 

(b) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR

2013.—Effective as of January 2, 2013, and as if included therein 

as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2013 (Public Law 112–239) is amended as follows: 

(1) Section 322(e)(2) (126 Stat. 1695) is amended by striking 

‘‘Section 2366b(A)(3)(F)’’ and inserting ‘‘Section 2366b(a)(3)(F)’’. 

(2) Section 371(a)(1) (126 Stat. 1706) is amended by striking 

‘‘subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g) and (h), respectively’’ 

and inserting ‘‘subsection (f) as subsection (g)’’. 

(3) Section 611(7) (126 Stat. 1776) is amended by striking 

‘‘Section 408a(e)’’ and inserting ‘‘Section 478a(e)’’. 

(4) Section 822(b) (126 Stat. 1830) is amended by striking 

‘‘such Act’’ and inserting ‘‘such section’’. 

(5) Section 1031(b)(3)(B) (126 Stat. 1918) is amended by 

striking the subclause (III) immediately below clause (iv). 

(6) Section 1031(b)(4) (126 Stat. 1919) is amended by 

striking ‘‘Section 1031(b)’’ and inserting ‘‘Section 1041(b)’’. 

(7) Section 1086(d)(1) (126 Stat. 1969) is amended by 

striking ‘‘paragraph (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (2)’’. 

(8) Section 1221(a)(2) (126 Stat. 1992) is amended by 

striking ‘‘FISCAL’’ both places it appears and inserting ‘‘FISCAL’’. 

(9) Section 1804 (126 Stat. 2111) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (h)(1)(B), by striking ‘‘inserting ‘; 

and’;’’ and inserting ‘‘inserting a semicolon;’’; and 

(B) in subsection (i), by inserting after ‘‘it appears’’ 

the following: ‘‘(except in those places in which ‘Administrator of FEMA’ already appears)’’. 

(c) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR

2012.—Effective as of December 31, 2011, and as if included therein 

as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2012 (Public Law 112–81) is amended as follows: 

(1) Section 312(b)(6)(F) (125 Stat. 1354) is amended by 

striking ‘‘subsection (D)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (d)’’. 

(2) Section 585(a)(1) (125 Stat. 1434; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) 

is amended by striking ‘‘experts sexual’’ and inserting ‘‘experts 

in sexual’’. 

(d) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR

2004.—Section 338(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 10 U.S.C. 5013 note), 

as most recently amended by section 321 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 

Stat. 1694), is amended by striking ‘‘subsection 4703’’ and inserting 

‘‘section 4703’’. 

(e) AMENDMENT TO TITLE 41.—Section 4712(i) is amended by 

inserting before ‘‘the enactment’’ the following: ‘‘that is 180 days 

after the date’’. 
H. R. 3304—206 

(f) COORDINATION WITH OTHER AMENDMENTS MADE BY THIS

ACT.—For purposes of applying amendments made by provisions 

of this Act other than this section, the amendments made by this 

section shall be treated as having been enacted immediately before 

any amendment made by other provisions of this Act. 

SEC. 1092. REDUCTION IN COSTS TO REPORT CRITICAL CHANGES TO 

MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAMS. 

(a) EXTENSION OF A PROGRAM DEFINED.—Section 2445a of title 

10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

following new subsection: 

‘‘(g) EXTENSION OF A PROGRAM.—In this chapter, the term 

‘extension of a program’ means, with respect to a major automated 

information system program or other major information technology 

investment program, the further deployment or planned deployment 

to additional users of the system which has already been found 

operationally effective and suitable by an independent test agency 

or the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, beyond the 

scope planned in the original estimate or information originally 

submitted on the program.’’. 

(b) REPORTS ON CRITICAL CHANGES IN MAIS PROGRAMS.—Subsection (d) of section 2445c of such title is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘paragraph (2)’’ and 

inserting ‘‘paragraph (3)’’; 

(2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and 

(3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): 

‘‘(2) CERTIFICATION WHEN VARIANCE DUE TO EXTENSION OF

PROGRAM.—If an official with milestone decision authority for 

a program who, following receipt of a quarterly report described 

in paragraph (1) and making a determination described in 

paragraph (3), also determines that the circumstances resulting 

in the determination described in paragraph (3) (A) is primarily 

due to an extension of a program, and (B) involves minimal 

developmental risk, the official may, in lieu of carrying out 

an evaluation and submitting a report in accordance with paragraph (1), submit to the congressional defense committees, 

within 45 days after receiving the quarterly report, a certification that the official has made those determinations. If such 

a certification is submitted, the limitation in subsection (g)(1) 

does not apply with respect to that determination under paragraph (3).’’. 

(c) CONFORMING CROSS-REFERENCE AMENDMENT.—Subsection 

(g)(1) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘subsection (d)(2)’’ 

and inserting ‘‘subsection (d)(3)’’. 

(d) TOTAL ACQUISITION COST INFORMATION.—Title 10, United 

States Code, is further amended— 

(1) in section 2445b(b)(3), by striking ‘‘development costs’’ 

and inserting ‘‘total acquisition costs’’; and 

(2) in section 2445c— 

(A) in subparagraph (B) of subsection (c)(2), by striking 

‘‘program development cost’’ and inserting ‘‘total acquisition 

cost’’; and 

(B) in subparagraph (C) of subsection (d)(3) (as redesignated by subsection (b)(2)), by striking ‘‘program development cost’’ and inserting ‘‘total acquisition cost’’. 
H. R. 3304—207 

(e) CLARIFICATION OF CROSS-REFERENCE.—Section 2445c(g)(2) 

of such title is amended by striking ‘‘in compliance with the requirements of subsection (d)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘under subsection 

(d)(1)(B)’’. 

SEC. 1093. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION TO ISSUE NON-PREMIUM AVIATION INSURANCE. 

Section 44310 of title 49, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before ‘‘The authority’’; 

(2) by striking ‘‘this chapter’’ and inserting ‘‘any provision 

of this chapter other than section 44305’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(b) INSURANCE OF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PROPERTY.— The authority of the Secretary of Transportation to provide insurance and reinsurance for a department, agency, or instrumentality 

of the United States Government under section 44305 is not effective after December 31, 2018.’’. 

SEC. 1094. EXTENSION OF MINISTRY OF DEFENSE ADVISOR PROGRAM 

AND AUTHORITY TO WAIVE REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS 

OF ACTIVITIES FOR CERTAIN NONGOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL. 

(a) EXTENSION OF MINISTER OF DEFENSE ADVISOR PROGRAM

AUTHORITY.— 

(1) Subsection (b) of section 1081 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 

125 Stat. 1599; 10 U.S.C. 168 note) is amended— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2014’’ 

and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2017’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2012, 

2013, or 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘a fiscal year ending on or 

before that date’’. 

(2) UPDATE OF POLICY GUIDANCE ON AUTHORITY.—The 

Under Secretary of Defense for Policy shall issue an update 

of the policy of the Department of Defense for assignment 

of civilian employees of the Department as advisors to foreign 

ministries of defense under the authority in section 1081 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, 

as amended by this section. 

(3) ADDITIONAL ANNUAL REPORTS.—Subsection (c) of such 

section is amended by striking ‘‘2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2017’’. 

(4) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Subsection (c)(4) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘carried out such by such’’ and 

inserting ‘‘carried out by such’’. 

(5) DATE FOR SUBMITTAL OF COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF

THE UNITED STATES REPORT.—Subsection (d) of such section 

is amended by striking ‘‘December 30, 2013’’ and inserting 

‘‘December 31, 2014’’ 

(b) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO WAIVE REIMBURSEMENT OF

COSTS OF ACTIVITIES FOR NONGOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL AT

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REGIONAL CENTERS FOR SECURITY

STUDIES.—Section 941(b)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 184 note) is 

amended by striking ‘‘through 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘through 2014’’. 

SEC. 1095. AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN NATIONAL COMMISSIONS. 

(a) NATIONAL COMMISSION ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE AIR

FORCE.— 
H. R. 3304—208 

(1) REVISION OF MEMBERS COMPENSATION.—Section 365(a) 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

(Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1705) is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘shall be compensated’’ and inserting 

‘‘may be compensated’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘equal to’’ and inserting ‘‘not to exceed’’; 

and 

(C) by inserting ‘‘of $155,400’’ after ‘‘annual rate’’. 

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by paragraph 

(1) shall apply with respect to compensation for a duty performed on or after April 2, 2013. 

(b) MILITARY COMPENSATION AND RETIREMENT MODERNIZATION

COMMISSION.— 

(1) SCOPE OF MILITARY COMPENSATION SYSTEM.—Section 

671(c)(5) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1788) is amended 

by inserting before the period the following ‘‘, and includes 

any other laws, policies, or practices of the Federal Government 

that result in any direct payment of authorized or appropriated 

funds to the persons specified in subsection (b)(1)(A)’’. 

(2) COMMISSION AUTHORITIES.—Section 673 of such Act (126 

Stat. 1790) is amended by adding at the end the following 

new subsections: 

‘‘(g) USE OF GOVERNMENT INFORMATION.—The Commission may 

secure directly from any department or agency of the Federal 

Government such information as the Commission considers necessary to carry out its duties. Upon such request of the Chair 

of the Commission, the head of such department or agency shall 

furnish such information to the Commission. 

‘‘(h) POSTAL SERVICES.—The Commission may use the United 

States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions 

as departments and agencies of the United States. 

‘‘(i) AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT GIFTS.—The Commission may 

accept, use, and dispose of gifts or donations of services, goods, 

and property from non-Federal entities for the purposes of aiding 

and facilitating the work of the Commission. The authority in 

this subsection does not extend to gifts of money. 

‘‘(j) PERSONAL SERVICES.— 

‘‘(1) AUTHORITY TO PROCURE.—The Commission may— 

‘‘(A) procure the services of experts or consultants (or 

of organizations of experts or consultants) in accordance 

with the provisions of section 3109 of title 5, United States 

Code; and 

‘‘(B) pay in connection with such services travel 

expenses of individuals, including transportation and per 

diem in lieu of subsistence, while such individuals are 

traveling from their homes or places of business to duty 

stations. 

‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—The total number of experts or consultants procured pursuant to paragraph (1) may not exceed five 

experts or consultants. 

‘‘(3) MAXIMUM DAILY PAY RATES.—The daily rate paid an 

expert or consultant procured pursuant to paragraph (1) may 

not exceed the daily rate paid a person occupying a position 

at level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of 

title 5, United States Code.’’. 
H. R. 3304—209 

(3) COMMISSION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS.—Section 

674(f) of such Act (126 Stat. 1792) is amended— 

(A) in paragraph (1)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘15 months’’ and inserting ‘‘24 

months’’; and 

(ii) by inserting ‘‘and recommendations for 

administrative actions’’ after ‘‘legislative language’’; 

and 

(B) in paragraph (6), by inserting ‘‘, and shall publish 

a copy of that report on an Internet website available 

to the public,’’ after ‘‘its report to Congress’’. 

(4) PRESIDENTIAL CONSIDERATION OF COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS.—Section 675 of such Act (126 Stat. 1793) is 

amended by striking subsection (d). 

(5) COMMISSION STAFF.— 

(A) DETAILEES RECEIVING MILITARY RETIRED PAY.—Subsection (b)(3) of section 677 of such Act (126 Stat. 1794) 

is amended— 

(i) in the paragraph heading, by striking ‘‘ELIGIBLE

FOR’’ and inserting ‘‘RECEIVING’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘eligible for or receiving military 

retired pay’’ and inserting ‘‘who are receiving military 

retired pay or who, but for being under the eligibility 

age applicable under section 12731 of title 10, United 

States Code, would be eligible to receive retired pay’’. 

(B) PERFORMANCE REVIEWS.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended— 

(i) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 

inserting ‘‘other than a member of the uniformed services or officer or employee who is detailed to the 

Commission,’’ after ‘‘executive branch department,’’; 

and 

(ii) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘(other than 

for administrative accuracy)’’ before the semicolon. 

(6) TERMINATION OF COMMISSION.—Section 679 of such Act 

(126 Stat. 1795) is amended by striking ‘‘26 months’’ and 

inserting ‘‘35 months’’. 

(7) FUNDING.—Section 680 of such Act (126 Stat. 1795) 

is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting 

‘‘$15,000,000’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new sentence: 

‘‘Amounts made available under this section after the date 

of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2014 shall be derived from fiscal year 

2013 balances that remain available for obligation on that 

date.’’. 

SEC. 1096. STRATEGY FOR FUTURE MILITARY INFORMATION OPERATIONS CAPABILITIES. 

(a) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

develop and implement a strategy for developing and sustaining 

through fiscal year 2020 information operations capabilities for 

future contingencies. The Secretary shall submit such strategy to 

the congressional defense committees by not later than 180 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
H. R. 3304—210 

(b) CONTENTS OF STRATEGY.—The strategy required by subsection (a) shall include each of the following: 

(1) A plan for the sustainment of existing capabilities that 

have been developed during the ten-year period prior to the 

date of the enactment of this Act, including such capabilities 

developed using funds authorized to be appropriated for overseas contingency operations determined to be of enduring value 

for continued sustainment. 

(2) A discussion of how the capabilities referred to in paragraph (1) are integrated into policy, doctrine, and operations. 

(3) An assessment of the force structure that is required 

to sustain operational planning and potential contingency operations, including the integration across the active and reserve 

components. 

(4) Estimates of the steady-state resources needed to support the force structure referred to in paragraph (3), as well 

as estimates for resources that might be needed based on 

selected operational plans, contingency plans, and named operations. 

(5) An assessment of the impact of how new and emerging 

technologies can be incorporated into policy, doctrine, and operations. 

(6) A description of ongoing research into new capabilities 

that may be needed to fill any identified gaps and programs 

that might be required to develop such capabilities. 

(7) Potential policy implications or legal challenges that 

may prevent the integration of new and emerging technologies 

into the projected force structure. 

(8) Potential policy implications or challenges to the better 

leveraging of capabilities from interagency partners. 

SEC. 1097. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COLLABORATION ON BORDER 

SECURITY. 

It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense and 

the Secretary of Homeland Security should, consistent with existing 

law and authorities, seek to collaborate on enhanced United States 

border security, including by identifying excess property of the 

Department of Defense, if any, that may be suitable for use by 

the Department of Homeland Security to support border security 

efforts. 

SEC. 1098. TRANSFER OF AIRCRAFT TO OTHER DEPARTMENTS FOR 

WILDFIRE SUPPRESSION AND OTHER PURPOSES; TACTICAL AIRLIFT FLEET OF THE AIR FORCE. 

(a) TRANSFER OF HC–130H AIRCRAFT.— 

(1) TRANSFER BY DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 45 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act and subject to the certification requirement under subsection (f), the Secretary of 

Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of 

Agriculture and the Secretary of Defense, shall begin 

transfer, without reimbursement, of— 

(i) the seven demilitarized HC–130H aircraft specified in subparagraph (C) to the Secretary of the Air 

Force; and 

(ii) initial spares and necessary ground support 

equipment for HC–130H aircraft to the Secretary of 
H. R. 3304—211 

Agriculture for use by the Director of Aviation and 

Fire Management of the Forest Service. 

(B) CALCULATION OF INITIAL SPARES.—For purposes of 

clause (ii) of subparagraph (A), initial spares shall be calculated based on shelf stock support for seven aircraft 

and each aircraft flying 400 hours each year. 

(C) AIRCRAFT SPECIFIED.—The aircraft specified in this 

subparagraph are the HC–130H Coast Guard aircraft with 

serial numbers 1706, 1708, 1709, 1713, 1714, 1719, and 

1721. 

(2) AIR FORCE ACTIONS.— (A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall 

accept the HC–130H aircraft transferred by the Secretary 

of Homeland Security under paragraph (1) and, subject 

to the availability of funds as supplemented by transfers 

under paragraph (4), shall— 

(i) at the first available opportunity, promptly 

schedule and serially synchronize with the Secretary 

of Homeland Security and the Secretary of Agriculture 

the induction of HC–130H aircraft to minimize maintenance induction on-ramp wait time of HC–130H aircraft; 

(ii) except as provided in subparagraph (B), perform center and outer wing-box replacement modifications, programmed depot-level maintenance, and modifications necessary to procure and integrate a gravitydrop aerial fire retardant dispersal system in each 

such HC–130H aircraft; and 

(iii) after modifications described in clause (ii) are 

completed for each such HC–130H aircraft, transfer 

each such aircraft, without reimbursement, to the Secretary of Agriculture for use by the Director of Aviation 

and Fire Management of the Forest Service. 

(B) EXCEPTIONS.—Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), 

the Secretary of the Air Force may not— 

(i) perform center wing-box replacement modifications on the HC–130H aircraft with serial numbers 

1706, 1708, 1714, and 1721; or 

(ii) perform an outer wing-box replacement modification on the HC–130H aircraft with serial number 

1721. 

(C) LIMITATIONS ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—The Secretary of the Air Force may not obligate more than— 

(i) $5,000,000 per each HC–130H aircraft transferred under paragraph (1) to perform the modifications necessary to procure and integrate a gravitydrop aerial fire retardant dispersal system in each 

such HC–130H aircraft unless, by reimbursable order, 

the Secretary of Agriculture provides the additional 

funding necessary to the Secretary of the Air Force 

to complete such modifications; and 

(ii) $130,000,000 to perform all programmed depotlevel maintenance and modifications described in 

subparagraph (A)(ii) for all such aircraft unless, by 

reimbursable order, the Secretary of Agriculture provides the additional funding necessary to the Secretary 

of the Air Force to complete such modifications. 
H. R. 3304—212 

(3) COAST GUARD ACTIONS.—In the case of any HC–130 

aircraft that is identified for transfer to the Secretary of the 

Air Force and requires induction into depot-level maintenance, 

the Commandant of the Coast Guard may utilize, on a limited 

basis, such aircraft prior to depot-level maintenance to fulfill 

high-priority maritime patrol mission requirements of the Coast 

Guard. The authority under this paragraph does not include 

aircraft that are modified under paragraph (2)(A)(ii). 

(4) TRANSFER OF FUNDS.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may use 

any appropriations or funds of the Department of Defense 

available for obligation as of the date of the enactment 

of this Act, and shall make transfers as necessary to supplement accounts of the Department of the Air Force, to 

perform the HC–130H modifications described under paragraph (2). 

(B) RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER AUTHORITY.—Transfer 

authority provided under this paragraph is in addition 

to any other transfer authority available to the Secretary 

of Defense for fiscal year 2014. 

(C) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 15 days 

after making a transfer pursuant to this paragraph, the 

Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense 

committees of such transfer. 

(b) TRANSFER OF C–23B+ SHERPA AIRCRAFT.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 

law, not later than 45 days after the date of the enactment 

of this Act, and subject to the certification requirement under 

subsection (f), the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with 

the Secretary of Agriculture, shall begin transfer, without 

reimbursement, of— 

(A) not more than 15 demilitarized C–23B+ Sherpa 

aircraft to the Secretary of Agriculture, subject to the 

quantity of C–23B+ Sherpa aircraft that the Director of 

Aviation and Fire Management of the Forest Service determines are required to meet fire-fighting requirements; and 

(B) initial spares and necessary ground support equipment for operation of C–23B+Sherpa aircraft to the Secretary of Agriculture for use by the Director of Aviation 

and Fire Management of the Forest Service. 

(2) CALCULATION OF INITIAL SPARES.—For purposes of paragraph (1), initial spares shall be calculated based on shelf 

stock support for the quantity of aircraft the Director of Aviation and Fire Management of the Forest Service determines 

necessary to meet fire-fighting requirements and each aircraft 

flying 300 hours each year. 

(c) CONDITIONS OF TRANSFERS.—Aircraft transferred to the Secretary of Agriculture under this section— 

(1) may be used only for wildfire suppression purposes; 

(2) may not be flown outside of, or otherwise removed 

from, the United States unless dispatched by the National 

Interagency Fire Center in support of an international agreement to assist in wildfire suppression efforts or for other purposes approved by the Secretary of Agriculture in writing in 

advance; and 

(3) may not be sold by the Secretary of Agriculture after 

transfer. 
H. R. 3304—213 

(d) COSTS AFTER TRANSFER.—Any costs of operation, maintenance, sustainment, and disposal of excess aircraft, initial spares, 

and ground support equipment transferred to the Secretary of Agriculture under this section that are incurred after the date of transfer 

shall be borne by the Secretary of Agriculture. 

(e) TRANSFER OF C–27J AIRCRAFT.—Promptly following the 

completion of the certification requirement under subsection (f) 

and notwithstanding section 1091 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 

Stat. 1971; 10 U.S.C. 2576 note), the Secretary of Defense shall 

begin transfer, without reimbursement, of— 

(1) 14 C–27J aircraft to the Secretary of Homeland Security; and 

(2) excess initial spares and necessary ground support 

equipment for 14 C–27J aircraft to the Secretary of Homeland 

Security for use by the Commandant of the Coast Guard as 

maritime patrol aircraft. 

(f) CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.—Notwithstanding any other 

provision of law, the Secretary of Defense may not transfer any 

aircraft to either the Secretary of Agriculture or the Secretary 

of Homeland Security until the Secretary of Defense and the 

Director of the Office of Management and Budget submit, by not 

later than 45 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

to the congressional defense committees certification that adequate 

funding has been transferred to the Department of the Air Force 

for the purpose of modifying HC–130H aircraft identified for 

transfer pursuant to subsection (a). 

(g) TRANSFER OF CERTAIN C–23 AIRCRAFT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.— 

(A) OFFER OF TRANSFER.—Not later than 30 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 

the Defense shall extend to the chief executive officer of 

the State of Alaska the opportunity to take title to not 

more than eight C–23 aircraft with tail numbers specified 

in subparagraph (B). 

(B) TAIL NUMBERS.—The tail numbers of the C–23 

aircraft subject to transfer under subparagraph (A) are 

as follows: 93–01319, 93–01329, 94–00308, 94–00309, 88– 

01869, 90–07015, 90–07016, and 90–07012. 

(2) REQUIREMENTS.—Subsections (b) and (c) of section 112 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 

(Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1318) shall apply with respect 

to the transfer of any C–23 aircraft under this subsection 

in the same manner as the transfer of aircraft under such 

section. 

(h) TACTICAL AIRLIFT FLEET OF THE AIR FORCE.— 

(1) CONSIDERATION OF UPGRADES OF CERTAIN AIRCRAFT IN

RECAPITALIZATION OF FLEET.—The Secretary of the Air Force 

shall consider, as part of the recapitalization of the tactical 

airlift fleet of the Air Force, upgrades to C–130H aircraft 

designed to help such aircraft meet the fuel efficiency goals 

of the Department of the Air Force and retention of such 

aircraft, as so upgraded, in the tactical airlift fleet. 

(2) MANNER OF UPGRADES.—The Secretary shall ensure 

that upgrades to the C–130H aircraft fleet are made in a 

manner that is proportional to the number of C–130H aircraft 
H. R. 3304—214 

in the force structure of the regular Air Force, the Air Force 

Reserve, and the Air National Guard. 

TITLE XI—CIVILIAN PERSONNEL 

MATTERS 

Sec. 1101. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium 

pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees 

working overseas. 

Sec. 1102. One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official duty in a combat zone. 

Sec. 1103. Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for civilian employees of the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1104. Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance payments to Department of Defense employees. 

Sec. 1105. Revision to amount of financial assistance under Department of Defense 

Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation (SMART) Defense Education Program and assessment of STEM and other programs. 

Sec. 1106. Extension of program for exchange of information-technology personnel. 

Sec. 1107. Temporary authorities for certain positions at Department of Defense research and engineering facilities. 

Sec. 1108. Compliance with law regarding availability of funding for civilian personnel. 

Sec. 1109. Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation authority for civilian personnel for care and treatment of wounded and injured members of the Armed Forces. 

SEC. 1101. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO WAIVE ANNUAL 

LIMITATION ON PREMIUM PAY AND AGGREGATE LIMITATION ON PAY FOR FEDERAL CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES 

WORKING OVERSEAS. 

Effective January 1, 2014, section 1101(a) of the Duncan Hunter 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public 

Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4615), as most recently amended by section 

1101 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1973), is further amended 

by striking ‘‘through 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘through 2014’’. 

SEC. 1102. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO 

GRANT ALLOWANCES, BENEFITS, AND GRATUITIES TO 

PERSONNEL ON OFFICIAL DUTY IN A COMBAT ZONE. 

Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, 

and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109–234; 120 Stat. 443), 

as added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 

Stat. 4616) and most recently amended by section 1104 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public 

Law 112–239; 125 Stat. 1973), is further amended by striking 

‘‘2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’. 

SEC. 1103. EXTENSION OF VOLUNTARY REDUCTION-IN-FORCE 

AUTHORITY FOR CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

Section 3502(f)(5) of title 5, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘September 30, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 

2018’’. 
H. R. 3304—215 

SEC. 1104. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO MAKE LUMP-SUM SEVERANCE PAYMENTS TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

EMPLOYEES. 

Section 5595(i)(4) of title 5, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘October 1, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2018’’. 

SEC. 1105. REVISION TO AMOUNT OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE UNDER 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, AND 

RESEARCH FOR TRANSFORMATION (SMART) DEFENSE 

EDUCATION PROGRAM AND ASSESSMENT OF STEM AND 

OTHER PROGRAMS. 

(a) REVISION TO FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR SMART PROGRAM.— 

(1) REVISION.—Paragraph (2) of section 2192a(b) of title 

10, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘the amount 

determined’’ and all that follows through ‘‘room and board’’ 

and inserting ‘‘an amount determined by the Secretary of 

Defense’’. 

(2) BRIEFING REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate 

and the House of Representatives, within 60 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, a briefing that assesses 

the impacts of the rising costs of higher education tuition 

on the number of students that the Department of Defense 

can accept into the Science, Mathematics, and Research for 

Transformation (SMART) Defense Education Program under 

section 2192a of title 10, United States Code. 

(b) ASSESSMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCIENCE, 

TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS PROGRAMS OF THE

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.— 

(1) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.— 

(A) The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report setting forth 

an assessment of each program as follows: 

(i) The Army Educational Outreach Program 

(AEOP). 

(ii) The STEM2Stern program of the Navy. 

(iii) The DoD STARBASE program carried out by 

the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 

Readiness. 

(iv) Prekindergarten through 12th grade activities 

of the National Defense Education Program. 

(B) The Secretary of Defense shall conduct assessments 

under this paragraph in consultation with the Secretary 

of Education and the heads of other appropriate Federal 

agencies. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The assessment of a program under paragraph (1) shall include the following: 

(A) An assessment of the current status of the program. 

(B) A determination to retain, terminate, or transfer 

the program to another agency, together with a justification 

for the determination. 

(C) For a program determined under subparagraph 

(B) to be terminated, a justification why the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education requirements of the program are no longer required. 
H. R. 3304—216 

(D) For a program determined under subparagraph 

(B) to be transferred to the jurisdiction of another agency— 

(i) the name of such agency; 

(ii) the funding anticipated to be provided the program by such agency during the five-year period beginning on the date of transfer; and 

(iii) mechanisms to ensure that education under 

the program will continue to meet the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education 

requirements of the Department of Defense, including 

requirements for the dependents covered by the program. 

(E) Metrics to assess whether a program under 

subparagraph (C) or (D) is meeting the requirements 

applicable to such program under such subparagraph. 

(3) LIMITATION ON CERTAIN ACTIONS ON PROGRAMS PENDING

SUBMITTAL OF ASSESSMENT.—A program specified in paragraph 

(1)(A) may not be terminated or transferred to the jurisdiction 

of another agency until 30 days after the date on which the 

report required by that paragraph is submitted to the congressional defense committees. 

(c) ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY SCIENCE AND

ENGINEERING FACULTY FELLOWSHIP.—The Secretary of Defense 

shall provide to the congressional defense committees, within 90 

days after the date of the enactment of this Act, a briefing that 

assesses the National Security Science and Engineering Faculty 

Fellowship (in this subsection referred to as the ‘‘Fellowship’’). 

The briefing shall include an assessment of the following: 

(1) The return on investment and qualitative impact of 

the research funded by Fellowship awardees. 

(2) Distribution of researcher awards from the past three 

years, including identification of researchers (if any) that have 

not done research with the Department of Defense in the past 

five years. 

(3) The number of new and continuing students supported 

by Fellowship funding, as well as the number of those students 

that later receive employment by the Department of Defense, 

Department of Defense contractors, or other academic institutions supported by Department of Defense grants. 

(4) A description of Fellowship awards and the use of 

the award funds. 

(5) Recommendations for improving the effectiveness or 

efficiency of the Fellowship. 

SEC. 1106. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM FOR EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY PERSONNEL. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1110(d) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (5 U.S.C. 3702 note) is 

amended by striking ‘‘2013.’’ and inserting ‘‘2018.’’. 

(b) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Section 1110(i) of such Act is 

amended by striking ‘‘2015,’’ and inserting ‘‘2019,’’. 

SEC. 1107. TEMPORARY AUTHORITIES FOR CERTAIN POSITIONS AT 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RESEARCH AND 

ENGINEERING FACILITIES. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO MAKE DIRECT APPOINTMENTS.— 
H. R. 3304—217 

(1) CANDIDATES FOR SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING POSITIONS AT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY REINVENTION LABORATORIES.—The director of any Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory (hereinafter in this section referred to as an 

‘‘STRL’’) may appoint qualified candidates possessing a bachelor’s degree to positions described in paragraph (1) of subsection (b) as an employee in a laboratory described in that 

paragraph without regard to the provisions of subchapter I 

of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code (other than sections 

3303 and 3328 of such title). 

(2) VETERAN CANDIDATES FOR SIMILAR POSITIONS AT

RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING FACILITIES.—The director of any 

STRL may appoint qualified veteran candidates to positions 

described in paragraph (2) of subsection (b) as an employee 

at a laboratory, agency, or organization specified in that paragraph without regard to the provisions of subchapter I of 

chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code. 

(b) COVERED POSITIONS.— 

(1) CANDIDATES FOR SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING POSI- TIONS.—The positions described in this paragraph are scientific 

and engineering positions that may be temporary, term, or 

permanent in any laboratory designated by section 1105(a) 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 

(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2486; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) 

as a Department of Defense science and technology reinvention 

laboratory. 

(2) QUALIFIED VETERAN CANDIDATES.—The positions 

described in this paragraph are scientific, technical, 

engineering, and mathematics positions, including technicians, 

in the following: 

(A) Any laboratory referred to in paragraph (1). 

(B) Any other Department of Defense research and 

engineering agency or organization designated by the Secretary for purposes of subsection (a)(2). 

(c) LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF APPOINTMENTS ALLOWABLE IN

A CALENDAR YEAR.—The authority under subsection (a) may not, 

in any calendar year and with respect to any laboratory, agency, 

or organization described in subsection (b), be exercised with respect 

to a number of candidates greater than the following: 

(1) In the case of a laboratory described in subsection 

(b)(1), with respect to appointment authority under subsection 

(a)(1), the number equal to 3 percent of the total number 

of scientific and engineering positions in such laboratory that 

are filled as of the close of the fiscal year last ending before 

the start of such calendar year. 

(2) In the case of a laboratory, agency, or organization 

described in subsection (b)(2), with respect to appointment 

authority under subsection (a)(2), the number equal to 1 percent 

of the total number of scientific, technical, engineering, mathematics, and technician positions in such laboratory, agency, 

or organization that are filled as of the close of the fiscal 

year last ending before the start of such calendar year. 

(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘employee’’ has the meaning given that term 

in section 2105 of title 5, United States Code. 

(2) The term ‘‘veteran’’ has the meaning given that term 

in section 101 of title 38, United States Code. 
H. R. 3304—218 

(e) SUNSET.—Appointments under subsection (a) may not be 

made after December 31, 2019. 

(f) SENIOR SCIENTIFIC TECHNICAL MANAGERS.— 

(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is hereby established in each 

STRL a category of senior professional scientific and technical 

positions, the incumbents of which shall be designated as 

‘‘senior scientific technical managers’’ and which shall be positions classified above GS–15 of the General Schedule, notwithstanding section 5108(a) of title 5, United States Code. The 

primary functions of such positions shall be— 

(A) to engage in research and development in the physical, biological, medical, or engineering sciences, or another 

field closely related to the mission of such STRL; and 

(B) to carry out technical supervisory responsibilities. 

(2) APPOINTMENTS.—The positions described in paragraph 

(1) may be filled, and shall be managed, by the director of 

the STRL involved, under criteria established pursuant to section 342(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 108 Stat. 2721), relating to 

personnel demonstration projects at laboratories of the Department of Defense, except that the director of the laboratory 

involved shall determine the number of such positions at such 

laboratory, not to exceed 1 percent of the number of scientists 

and engineers employed at such laboratory as of the close 

of the last fiscal year before the fiscal year in which any 

appointments subject to that numerical limitation are made. 

(3) SUNSET.—Appointments under this subsection may not 

be made after December 31, 2019. 

(g) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees an annual report 

on the operation of this section. Each such report shall include, 

for the period covered by such report— 

(1) the total number of individuals appointed under subsection (a)(1) during such period; 

(2) the total number of individuals appointed under subsection (a)(2) during such period; and 

(3) the total number of senior scientific technical managers 

at each STRL as of the end of such period. 

(h) EXCLUSION FROM PERSONNEL LIMITATIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The director of an STRL shall manage 

the workforce strength, structure, positions, and compensation 

of such STRL— 

(A) without regard to any limitation on appointments, 

positions, or funding with respect to such STRL, subject 

to subparagraph (B); and 

(B) in a manner consistent with the budget available 

with respect to such STRL. 

(2) EXCEPTIONS.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to Senior 

Executive Service positions (as defined in section 3132(a) of 

title 5, United States Code) or scientific and professional positions authorized under section 3104 of such title. 

SEC. 1108. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF 

FUNDING FOR CIVILIAN PERSONNEL. 

(a) REGULATIONS.—No later than 90 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe 

regulations implementing the authority in subsection (a) of section 
H. R. 3304—219 

1111 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 1580 note prec.). 

(b) COORDINATION.—The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for 

Personnel and Readiness, shall be responsible for coordinating the 

preparation of the regulations required under subsection (a). 

(c) LIMITATIONS.—The regulations required under subsection 

(a) shall not be restricted by any civilian full-time equivalent or 

end-strength limitation, nor shall such regulations require offsetting 

civilian pay funding, civilian full-time equivalents, or civilian endstrengths. 

SEC. 1109. EXTENSION OF ENHANCED APPOINTMENT AND COMPENSATION AUTHORITY FOR CIVILIAN PERSONNEL FOR CARE 

AND TREATMENT OF WOUNDED AND INJURED MEMBERS 

OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (c) of section 1599c of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2015’’ 

both places it appears and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2020’’. 

(b) REPEAL OF FULFILLED REQUIREMENT.—Such section is further amended— 

(1) by striking subsection (b); and 

(2) by redesignating subsection (c), as amended by subsection (a), as subsection (b). 

(c) REPEAL OF REFERENCES TO CERTAIN TITLE 5 AUTHORITIES.— 

Subsection (a)(2)(A) of such section is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘sections 3304, 5333, and 5753 of title 5’’ 

and inserting ‘‘section 3304 of title 5’’; and 

(2) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘the authorities in such sections’’ and inserting ‘‘the authority in such section’’. 

TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO 

FOREIGN NATIONS 

Subtitle A—Assistance and Training 

Sec. 1201. Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build 

the capacity of foreign military forces. 

Sec. 1202. Global Security Contingency Fund. 

Sec. 1203. Training of general purpose forces of the United States Armed Forces 

with military and other security forces of friendly foreign countries. 

Sec. 1204. Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of foreign countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction. 

Sec. 1205. Authorization of National Guard State Partnership Program. 

Sec. 1206. United States security and assistance strategies in Africa. 

Sec. 1207. Assistance to the Government of Jordan for border security operations. 

Sec. 1208. Support of foreign forces participating in operations to disarm the Lord’s 

Resistance Army. 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq 

Sec. 1211. Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1212. One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration activities 

in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1213. Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for 

support provided to United States military operations. 

Sec. 1214. Extension and modification of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq. 

Sec. 1215. One-year extension and modification of authority for program to develop 

and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1216. Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 100 percent of all taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not reimbursed by Afghanistan. 
H. R. 3304—220 

Sec. 1217. Extension of certain authorities for support of foreign forces supporting 

or participating with the United States Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1218. Extension and improvement of the Iraqi special immigrant visa program. 

Sec. 1219. Improvement of the Afghan special immigrant visa program. 

Subtitle C—Matters Relating to Afghanistan Post 2014 

Sec. 1221. Report on plans to disrupt and degrade Haqqani Network activities and 

finances. 

Sec. 1222. Completion of accelerated transition of security responsibility from 

United States Armed Forces to the Afghan National Security Forces. 

Sec. 1223. Defense intelligence plan. 

Sec. 1224. Limitation on availability of funds for certain authorities for Afghanistan. 

Subtitle D—Matters Relating to Iran 

Sec. 1231. Report on United States military partnership with Gulf Cooperation 

Council countries. 

Sec. 1232. Additional elements in annual report on military power of Iran. 

Sec. 1233. Integrated air and missile defense programs at training locations in 

Southwest Asia. 

Subtitle E—Reports and Other Matters 

Sec. 1241. Two-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities. 

Sec. 1242. Element on 5th generation fighter program in annual report on military 

and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China. 

Sec. 1243. Report on posture and readiness of the Armed Forces to respond to an 

attack or other contingency against United States diplomatic facilities 

overseas. Sec. 1244. Limitation on establishment of Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers. 

Sec. 1245. Additional reports on military and security developments involving the 

Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. 

Sec. 1246. Sense of Congress on missile defense cooperation with the Russian Federation and limitations on providing certain missile defense information 

to the Russian Federation. 

Sec. 1247. Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and Disarmament 

Act. 

Sec. 1248. Report on actions to reduce support for ballistic missile proliferation. 

Sec. 1249. Reports on international agreements relating to the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1250. Revision of statutory references to former NATO support organizations 

and related NATO agreements. 

Sec. 1251. Executive agreements with the Russian Federation relating to ballistic 

missile defense. 

Sec. 1252. Rule of construction. 

Sec. 1253. Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms Trade Treaty. 

Sec. 1254. Report on military and security developments involving the Russian 

Federation. 

Sec. 1255. Prohibition on use of funds to enter into contracts or agreements with 

Rosoboronexport. 

Subtitle A—Assistance and Training 

SEC. 1201. MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES 

RELATING TO PROGRAM TO BUILD THE CAPACITY OF 

FOREIGN MILITARY FORCES. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) of section 1206 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109– 

163; 119 Stat. 3456), as most recently amended by section 1206 

of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4625), is further amended 

by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3) To build the capacity of a foreign country’s security 

forces to conduct counterterrorism operations.’’. 
H. R. 3304—221 

(b) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Subsection (c)(5) of section 1206 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, 

as most recently amended by section 1201 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 

Stat. 1979), is further amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘not more than $75,000,000 may be used 

during fiscal year 2010, not more than $75,000,000 may be 

used during fiscal year 2011, and’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘each of fiscal years 2012, 2013, and 2014’’ 

and inserting ‘‘each fiscal year through fiscal year 2017’’. 

(c) LIMITATION ON FISCAL YEAR 2015 FUNDS.—Of the funds 

authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 1206 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015, not more than 

$262,500,000 may be obligated or expended until the Secretary 

of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, submits 

to the congressional defense committees a report on the proposed 

planning and execution of programs intended to be conducted or 

supported under subsection (a)(3) of section 1206 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as added by subsection (a), during fiscal year 2015, including a description of the 

proposed planning and execution of the amount of funds to be 

made available for such programs. 

(d) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation 

with the Secretary of State, submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report on the scope of counterterrorism operations 

for which assistance is authorized to be provided under section 

1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2006. The report shall include the following: 

(1) A statement of the purposes for which assistance may 

be provided under the authority of section 1206 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, consistent with 

the Presidential Policy Directive on United States Security 

Sector Assistance issued on April 5, 2013. 

(2) A description of the types of activities that are appropriately within the scope of capacity building assistance under 

such authority. 

(3) A description and assessment of the monitoring and 

evaluation procedures for such assistance, including measures 

of effectiveness applicable to counterterrorism capacity building 

activities under such authority. 

(4) A prioritized list and discussion of the primary security 

threats as of the date of the report against which counterterrorism capacity building under such authority is or may be 

directed, in light of the end of combat operations in Iraq and 

the expected completion of combat operations by coalition forces 

in Afghanistan by December 2014. 

(e) TERMINATION OF PROGRAM.—Subsection (g) of section 1206 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, 

as most recently amended by section 1201 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, is further amended by 

striking ‘‘2014’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘2017’’. 
H. R. 3304—222 

SEC. 1202. GLOBAL SECURITY CONTINGENCY FUND. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—Subsection (b) of section 1207 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112– 

81; 125 Stat. 1625; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is amended— 

(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting 

‘‘or regions’’ after ‘‘countries’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by 

striking ‘‘and other national security forces’’ and inserting 

‘‘or other national security forces’’; and 

(B) in subparagraph (A)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘and counterterrorism operations’’ 

and inserting ‘‘or counterterrorism operations’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end and inserting 

‘‘or’’. 

(b) NOTICES TO CONGRESS.—Subsection (l) of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(l) NOTICES TO CONGRESS.—Not less than 30 days before initiating an activity under a program of assistance under subsection 

(b), the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall 

jointly submit to the specified congressional committees a notification that includes the following: 

‘‘(1) A notification of the intent to transfer funds into the 

Fund under subsection (f) or any other authority, including 

the original source of the funds. 

‘‘(2) A detailed justification for the total anticipated program for each country, including total anticipated costs and 

the specific activities contained therein. 

‘‘(3) The budget, execution plan and timeline, and anticipated completion date for the activity. 

‘‘(4) A list of other security-related assistance or justice 

sector and stabilization assistance that the United States is 

currently providing the country concerned and that is related 

to or supported by the activity. 

‘‘(5) Such other information relating to the program or 

activity as the Secretary of State or Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.’’. 

(c) TRANSITIONAL AUTHORITIES; GUIDANCE AND PROCESSES FOR

EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY.—Such section, as so amended, is further 

amended— 

(1) by striking subsection (n); 

(2) by redesignating subsection (m) as subsection (n); and 

(3) by inserting after subsection (l), as so amended, the 

following new subsection (m): 

‘‘(m) GUIDANCE AND PROCESSES FOR EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY.— 

Not later than 15 days after the date on which guidance and 

processes for implementation of the authority in subsection (b) 

have been issued, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of 

Defense shall jointly submit a report to the specified congressional 

committees on such guidance and processes. The Secretary of State 

and Secretary of Defense shall jointly submit additional reports 

not later than 15 days after the date on which any future modifications to the guidance and processes for implementation of the 

authority in subsection (b) are issued.’’. 

(d) ANNUAL REPORTS.—Subsection (n) of such section, as 

redesignated by subsection (c)(2) of this section, is amended— 
H. R. 3304—223 

(1) by striking ‘‘October 30, 2012, and annually thereafter’’ 

and inserting ‘‘October 30 each year’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘subsection (q)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection 

(p)’’. 

(e) FUNDING.—Such section, as so amended, is further 

amended— 

(1) by striking subsection (o); and 

(2) by redesignating subsections (p) and (q) as subsections 

(o) and (p), respectively. 

SEC. 1203. TRAINING OF GENERAL PURPOSE FORCES OF THE UNITED 

STATES ARMED FORCES WITH MILITARY AND OTHER 

SECURITY FORCES OF FRIENDLY FOREIGN COUNTRIES. 

(a) TRAINING AUTHORIZED.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Under regulations prescribed under subsection (f), general purpose forces of the United States Armed 

Forces may train with the military forces or other security 

forces of a friendly foreign country if the Secretary of Defense 

determines that it is in the national security interests of the 

United States to do so. Training may be conducted under this 

section only with the prior approval of the Secretary of Defense. 

(2) CONCURRENCE.—Before conducting a training event in 

or with a foreign country under this subsection, the Secretary 

of Defense shall seek the concurrence of the Secretary of State 

in such training event. 

(b) TYPES OF TRAINING AUTHORIZED.—Any training conducted 

by the United States Armed Forces pursuant to subsection (a) 

shall, to the maximum extent practicable— 

(1) support the mission essential tasks for which the 

training unit providing such training is responsible; 

(2) be with a foreign unit or organization with equipment 

that is functionally similar to such training unit; and 

(3) include elements that promote— 

(A) observance of and respect for human rights and 

fundamental freedoms; and 

(B) respect for legitimate civilian authority within the 

foreign country or countries concerned. 

(c) AUTHORITY TO PAY EXPENSES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of a military department 

or the commander of a combatant command may pay, or 

authorize payment for, the incremental expenses incurred by 

a friendly foreign country as the direct result of training with 

general purpose forces of the United States Armed Forces 

pursuant to subsection (a). 

(2) LIMITATION.—The amount of incremental expenses payable under paragraph (1) in any fiscal year may not exceed 

$10,000,000. 

(d) NOTICE BEFORE COMMENCEMENT OF TRAINING.—The Secretary of Defense shall notify the Committees on Armed Services 

of the Senate and the House of Representatives not later than 

15 days before the commencement of any training event pursuant 

to subsection (a). The notice on a training event shall include 

a description of the event and the foreign country or countries 

involved in the event. 

(e) ANNUAL REPORTS TO CONGRESS.—Not later than April 1 

of each year following a fiscal year in which training is conducted 

pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
H. R. 3304—224 

to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the training 

conducted pursuant to that subsection. Each report shall specify 

the following: 

(1) For the fiscal year covered by such report, the following: 

(A) Each country in which training was conducted. 

(B) The type of training conducted, the duration of 

such training, and the number of members of the United 

States Armed Forces involved in such training. 

(C) The extent of participation in such training by 

foreign military forces and other security forces, including 

the number and service affiliation of foreign military and 

other security force personnel involved and the physical 

and financial contribution of each country specified in 

subparagraph (A) in such training. 

(D) The relationship of such training to other overseas 

training programs conducted by the United States Armed 

Forces, such as military exercise programs sponsored by 

the Joint Chiefs of Staff, military exercise programs sponsored by a combatant command, and military training 

activities sponsored by a military department (including 

deployments for training, short duration exercises, and 

other similar unit training events). 

(E) A summary of the expenditures under subsection 

(c) in connection with such training. 

(F) A description and assessment of the unique military 

training benefits for members of the United States Armed 

Forces involved in such training. 

(2) A list of the training events to be conducted during 

the 12-month period beginning on April 1 of the year in which 

such report is submitted. 

(f) REGULATIONS.—Any training conducted pursuant to subsection (a) shall be conducted under regulations prescribed by the 

Secretary of Defense for the administration of this section. The 

regulations shall be prescribed not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act. 

(g) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations 

of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations 

of the House of Representatives. 

(2) The term ‘‘incremental expenses’’, with respect to a 

friendly foreign country, means the reasonable and proper costs 

of rations, fuel, training ammunition, transportation, and other 

goods and services consumed by such country as a direct result 

of that country’s participation in training conducted pursuant 

to subsection (a), except that such term does not include pay, 

allowances, and other normal costs of such country’s military 

or security force personnel. 

(3) The term ‘‘other security forces’’ includes national security forces that conduct border and maritime security, but does 

not include civilian police. 

(h) EXPIRATION.—The authority under this section may not 

be exercised after September 30, 2017. 
H. R. 3304—225 

SEC. 1204. AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT ACTIVITIES TO ENHANCE THE 

CAPABILITY OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES TO RESPOND TO 

INCIDENTS INVOLVING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense may, with the 

concurrence of the Secretary of State, provide assistance to the 

military and civilian first responder organizations of countries that 

share a border with Syria in order to enhance the capability of 

such countries to respond effectively to potential incidents involving 

weapons of mass destruction in Syria and the surrounding region. 

(b) AVAILABILITY OF AUTHORITY FOR OTHER COUNTRIES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of Defense determines, 

with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, that the Department of Defense should provide the assistance authorized in 

subsection (a) to countries other than the countries described 

in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may provide such 

assistance to such other countries. 

(2) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Defense may not provide 

assistance under paragraph (1) until the Secretary provides 

written notification to the congressional defense committees 

of the Secretary’s intention to provide such assistance, together 

with an explanation of the scope of the assistance and the 

reasons for providing the assistance. 

(c) AUTHORIZED ELEMENTS.—Assistance provided under this 

section may include training, equipment, and supplies. 

(d) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.— 

(1) FUNDS AVAILABLE.—Amounts for assistance under this 

section in a fiscal year shall be derived from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for 

Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, and available for 

the Defense Threat Reduction Agency for such fiscal year. 

(2) AVAILABILITY ACROSS FISCAL YEARS.—Amounts available 

under paragraph (1) may be available for assistance that begins 

in a fiscal year and ends in the next fiscal year. 

(e) NOTICE TO CONGRESS ON CERTAIN ASSISTANCE.—If the 

amount of assistance to be provided under this section in a fiscal 

year is anticipated to exceed $4,000,000, the Secretary of Defense 

shall notify the congressional defense committees in writing of 

that fact. 

(f) INTERAGENCY COORDINATION.—In carrying out this section, 

the Secretary of Defense shall comply with all applicable requirements for coordination and consultation within the Executive 

Branch. 

(g) REPORTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the authority 

in subsection (a) is first exercised and 60 days after the end 

of any fiscal year in which the authority under this section 

is exercised, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth the following: 

(A) A list of the countries to which the assistance 

has been or is being provided under the authority in this 

section, and a description of the assistance provided to 

each country under such authority. 

(B) A description of how such assistance advances the 

national security interests of the United States and is 

consistent with broader United States national security 
H. R. 3304—226 

policy and strategy in each country provided assistance 

and within the applicable region. 

(C) The amount of funds used to provide such assistance to each country during the fiscal year covered by 

the report. 

(D) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. 

(2) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In 

this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ 

means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations 

of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations 

of the House of Representatives. 

(h) EXPIRATION.—The authority to provide assistance under 

this section may not be exercised after September 30, 2017. 

SEC. 1205. AUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL GUARD STATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM. 

(a) AUTHORITY.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, with the 

concurrence of the Secretary of State, is authorized to establish 

a program of exchanges of members of the National Guard 

of a State or territory and the military forces, or security 

forces or other government organizations whose primary functions include disaster response or emergency response, of a 

foreign country. 

(2) STATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.—Each program established under this subsection shall be known as a ‘‘State Partnership Program’’. 

(b) LIMITATION.—An activity under a program established under 

subsection (a) that involves the security forces or other government 

organizations whose primary functions include disaster response 

or emergency response of a foreign country, or an activity that 

the Secretary of Defense determines is a matter within the core 

competencies of the National Guard of a State or territory, may 

be carried out only if the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence 

of the Secretary of State, determines and notifies the appropriate 

congressional committees not less than 15 days before initiating 

such activity that the activity is in the national security interests 

of the United States. 

(c) REGULATIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

prescribe regulations to carry out this section. Such regulations 

shall establish accounting procedures to ensure that expenditures of funds to carry out this section are accounted for and 

appropriate. 

(2) NOTIFICATION.—Not later than 15 days after the date 

on which such regulations have been prescribed, the Secretary 

of Defense— 

(A) shall notify the appropriate congressional committees that the regulations have been prescribed; and 

(B) shall provide to the appropriate congressional 

committees a copy of the regulations. 
H. R. 3304—227 

(d) AVAILABILITY OF AUTHORIZED FUNDS FOR PROGRAM.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Funds authorized to be appropriated to 

the Department of Defense, including funds authorized to be 

appropriated for the Army National Guard and Air National 

Guard, are authorized to be available— 

(A) for payment of costs incurred by the National 

Guard of a State or territory to conduct activities under 

a program established under subsection (a); and 

(B) for payment of incremental expenses of a foreign 

country to conduct activities under a program established 

under subsection (a). 

(2) LIMITATIONS.— 

(A) ACTIVE DUTY REQUIREMENT.—Funds shall not be 

available under paragraph (1) for the participation of a 

member of the National Guard of a State or territory 

in activities in a foreign country unless the member is 

on active duty in the Armed Forces at the time of such 

participation 

(B) INCREMENTAL EXPENSES.—The total amount of payments for incremental expenses of foreign countries as 

authorized under paragraph (1)(B) for activities under programs established under subsection (a) in any fiscal year 

may not exceed $10,000,000. 

(e) REPORTS AND NOTIFICATIONS.— 

(1) REVIEW AND REPORT OF EXISTING PROGRAMS.— (A) REVIEW.—The Secretary of Defense, with the 

concurrence of the Secretary of State, shall conduct a comprehensive review of each program under the State Partnership Program as in effect on the day before the date 

of the enactment of this Act. 

(B) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees 

a report on— 

(i) the findings of the review conducted under 

subparagraph (A); and 

(ii) any recommendations with respect to the 

review conducted under subparagraph (A). 

(2) ANNUAL REPORT.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than January 31 of each 

year following a fiscal year in which activities under a 

program established under subsection (a) are carried out, 

the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate 

congressional committees a report on such activities under 

the program. 

(B) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—Each report shall 

specify, for the fiscal year covered by such report, the 

following: 

(i) Each foreign country in which the activities 

were conducted. 

(ii) The type of activities conducted, the duration 

of the activities, and the number of members of the 

National Guard of each State or territory involved 

in such activities. 

(iii) The extent of participation in the activities 

by the military forces and security forces of such foreign country. 
H. R. 3304—228 

(iv) A summary of expenditures to conduct the 

activities, including the annual cost of the activities, 

with a breakdown of such expenditures by geographic 

combatant command. 

(v) With respect to activities described in subsection (b), the objective of the activities, and a description of how the activities support the theater campaign 

plan of the commander of the geographic combatant 

command with responsibility for the country or countries in which the training occurred. 

(f) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 

construed to supersede any authority under title 10, United States 

Code, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(g) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term 

‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

(2) INCREMENTAL EXPENSES.—The term ‘‘incremental 

expenses’’, with respect to a foreign country— 

(A) means the reasonable and proper costs of rations, 

fuel, training ammunition, transportation, and other goods 

and services consumed by the country as a direct result 

of the country’s participation in activities conducted under 

subsection (a); and 

(B) does not include— 

(i) any form of lethal assistance (excluding training 

ammunition); or 

(ii) pay, allowances, and other normal costs of the 

personnel of the country. 

(h) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY.—Section 1210 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public 

Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2517; 32 U.S.C. 107 note) is repealed. 

(i) TERMINATION.—The authority granted under subsection (a) 

shall terminate on September 30, 2016. 

SEC. 1206. UNITED STATES SECURITY AND ASSISTANCE STRATEGIES 

IN AFRICA. 

(a) STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR COUNTERTERRORISM ASSISTANCE AND COOPERATION IN THE SAHEL AND THE MAGHREB

REGIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in 

coordination with the Secretary of State, develop a strategic 

framework for United States counterterrorism assistance and 

cooperation in the Sahel and Maghreb regions of Africa, 

including for programs conducted under the Trans-Sahara 

Counter Terrorism Partnership, Operation Enduring Freedom– 

Trans Sahara, and related security assistance authorities. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The strategic framework required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: 

(A) An evaluation of the threat of terrorist organizations operating in the Sahel and Maghreb regions to the 

national security of the United States. 

(B) An identification on a regional basis of the primary 

objectives, priorities, and desired end-states of United 
H. R. 3304—229 

States counterterrorism assistance and cooperation programs in the region, and of the resources required to 

achieve such objectives, priorities, and end-states. 

(C) A methodology for assessing the effectiveness of 

United States counterterrorism assistance and cooperation 

programs in the region in making progress towards the 

objectives and desired end-states identified pursuant to 

subparagraph (B), including an identification of key benchmarks of such progress. 

(D) Criteria for bilateral and multilateral partnerships 

in the region. 

(E) Plans for enhancing coordination among United 

States and international agencies for planning and 

implementation of United States counterterrorism assistance and cooperation programs for the region on a regional 

basis, rather than a country-by-country basis, in order to 

improve coordination among United States regional and 

bilateral counterterrorism assistance and cooperation programs in the region. 

(3) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the 

Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate 

committees of Congress a report that includes the following: 

(A) A comprehensive description of the strategic framework required by paragraph (1). 

(B) A description of lessons learned regarding the 

organization and implementation of United States counterterrorism assistance and cooperation programs for the 

Sahel and Maghreb regions of Africa, including an evaluation of the performance and commitment of regional partners in the Sahel and Maghreb regions, including Mali 

in particular, in 2012 and 2013. 

(b) STRATEGY TO SUPPORT CONSOLIDATION OF SECURITY AND

GOVERNANCE GAINS IN SOMALIA.— (1) REQUIREMENT FOR STRATEGY.—Not later than 180 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President 

shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a 

strategy to guide future United States policy and programs 

in Somalia to counter armed threats and support regional security, and in support of Somali and international efforts to 

foster economic growth and opportunity, counter armed threats 

to stability, and develop credible, transparent, and representative government systems and institutions. 

(2) CONTENT OF STRATEGY.—The strategy required under 

paragraph (1) should include the following elements: 

(A) An interagency framework to plan, coordinate and 

review diplomatic, military, intelligence, development, and 

humanitarian elements of the United States policy 

regarding Somalia. 

(B) Plans and benchmarks for strengthening efforts, 

as appropriate, of the Government of Somalia, the African 

Union, and regional governments to stabilize the security 

situation within Somalia and further degrade al-Shabaab’s 

capabilities, in order to enable the eventual transfer of 

security operations to Somali security forces capable of— 

(i) maintaining and expanding security and stability within Somalia; 
H. R. 3304—230 

(ii) confronting transnational security threats; and 

(iii) preventing human rights abuses. 

(C) A plan to support the development and 

professionalization of credible, civilian led, Somali security 

forces that are representative of the population, including 

the infrastructure and procedures required to ensure chain 

of custody and the safe storage of military equipment and 

an assessment of the benefits and risks of the provision 

of weaponry to the Somali security forces by the United 

States. 

(D) A description of United States national security 

objectives addressed through military-to-military cooperation activities with Somali security forces. 

(E) A description of security risks to any United States 

personnel conducting security cooperation activities within 

Somalia and plans to assist the Somali security forces 

in preventing infiltration and insider attacks, including 

through the application of lessons learned in United States 

military training efforts in Afghanistan. 

(F) A description of United States tools for monitoring 

and responding to violations of the United Nations Security 

Council arms embargo, charcoal ban, and other international agreements affecting the stability of Somalia. 

(G) A description of mechanisms for coordinating 

United States military and non-military assistance with 

other international donors, regional governments, and relevant multilateral organizations. 

(H) A plan to support the consolidation of political 

gains at the national level, while also encouraging and 

supporting complementary processes at the local and 

regional levels and encouraging improved collaboration 

among Somali national and regional administrations. 

(I) Any plans to increase United States diplomatic 

engagement with Somalia, including through the future 

establishment of an embassy or other diplomatic posts in 

Mogadishu. 

(J) Any other element the President determines appropriate. 

(3) REPORTS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the submission of the strategy required under paragraph (1), 

and annually thereafter for three years, the President shall 

submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an update 

on implementation of the strategy and progress made in 

Somalia and associated benchmarks for security, stability, 

development, and governance. 

(4) FORM.—The strategy required under paragraph (1) and 

the reports required under paragraph (3) shall be submitted 

in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

(c) INTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENT AND REPORT ON AL-SHABAAB.— 

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a classified intelligence assessment 

of the terrorist organization known as al-Shabaab. Such assessment 

shall include the following: 

(1) A description of organizational structure, operational 

objectives, and funding sources for al-Shabaab. 
H. R. 3304—231 

(2) An assessment of the extent to which al-Shabaab 

threatens security and stability within Somalia and surrounding countries. 

(3) An assessment of the extent to which al-Shabaab 

threatens the security of United States citizens or the national 

security or interests of the United States. 

(4) The description of the relationship between al-Shabaab 

and al-Qaeda and al-Qaeda affiliates. 

(5) An assessment of the capacity of the Government of 

Somalia to counter the threat posed by al-Shabaab. 

(6) An assessment of the capacity of regional countries 

and organizations, including the African Union, to counter the 

threat posed by al-Shabaab. 

(d) DESIGNATION OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL FOR AFRICA EXPORT

POLICY.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment 

of this Act, and for the following three years, the President shall 

designate an existing senior United States Government official with 

existing interagency authority for export policy for Africa to coordinate among various United States Government agencies existing 

export strategies with the goal of significantly increasing United 

States exports to Africa in real dollar value. 

(e) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, the Committee on Appropriations, and the 

Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, and the 

Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 

Representatives. 

SEC. 1207. ASSISTANCE TO THE GOVERNMENT OF JORDAN FOR 

BORDER SECURITY OPERATIONS. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may, with the 

concurrence of the Secretary of State, provide assistance on 

a reimbursement basis to the Government of Jordan for purposes of supporting and maintaining efforts of the armed forces 

of Jordan to increase security and sustain increased security 

along the border between Jordan and Syria. 

(2) FREQUENCY.—Assistance under this subsection may be 

provided on a quarterly basis. 

(3) CERTIFICATION.—Assistance may be provided under this 

subsection only if the Secretary of Defense certifies to the 

specified congressional committees that the Government of 

Jordan is continuing to support and maintain efforts of the 

armed forces of Jordan to increase security or sustain increased 

security along the border between Jordan and Syria. 

(b) FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR ASSISTANCE.—Amounts authorized 

to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by title XV and available 

for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided 

to United States military operations pursuant to section 1233 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public 

Law 110–181) as specified in the funding table in section 4302 

may be used to provide assistance under the authority in subsection 

(a). 

(c) LIMITATIONS.— 
H. R. 3304—232 

(1) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT.—The total amount of assistance provided under the authority in subsection (a) may not 

exceed $150,000,000. 

(2) PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense may not enter into any contractual obligation 

to provide assistance under the authority in subsection (a). 

(d) NOTICE BEFORE EXERCISE.—Not later than 15 days before 

providing assistance under the authority in subsection (a), the 

Secretary of Defense shall submit to the specified congressional 

committees a report setting forth a full description of the assistance 

to be provided, including the amount of assistance to be provided, 

and the timeline for the provision of such assistance. 

(e) SPECIFIED CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—In this section, 

the term ‘‘specified congressional committees’’ means— 

(1) the congressional defense committees; and 

(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

(f) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.—No assistance may be provided 

under the authority in subsection (a) after December 31, 2015. 

SEC. 1208. SUPPORT OF FOREIGN FORCES PARTICIPATING IN OPERATIONS TO DISARM THE LORD’S RESISTANCE ARMY. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—Pursuant to the policy established by the 

Lord’s Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda 

Recovery Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–172; 124 Stat. 1209), the 

Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of Secretary of 

State, provide logistic support, supplies, and services, and intelligence support, to foreign forces participating in operations to 

mitigate and eliminate the threat posed by the Lord’s Resistance 

Army as follows: 

(1) The national military forces of Uganda. 

(2) The national military forces of any other country determined by the Secretary of Defense to be participating in such 

operations. 

(b) FUNDING.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year for the Department of Defense for 

operation and maintenance, not more than $50,000,000 may 

be used in such fiscal year to provide support under subsection 

(a). 

(2) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS ACROSS FISCAL YEARS.— 

Amounts available under this subsection for a fiscal year for 

support under the authority in subsection (a) may be used 

for support under that authority that begins in such fiscal 

year but ends in the next fiscal year. 

(c) LIMITATIONS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may not use 

the authority in subsection (a) to provide any type of support 

that is otherwise prohibited by any provision of law. 

(2) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014.—Of the 

amount available under subsection (b) for fiscal year 2014, 

not more than $37,500,000 may be obligated or expended to 

provide support under subsection (a) until the Secretary submits to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on 

Operation Observant Compass, including the specific goals of 

the campaign to counter the Lord’s Resistance Army, the precise 
H. R. 3304—233 

metrics used to measure progress in the campaign, and the 

actions that will be taken to transition the campaign if it 

is determined that it is no longer necessary for the United 

States to support the mission of the campaign. 

(d) NOTICE TO CONGRESS ON SUPPORT TO BE PROVIDED.—Not 

less than 15 days before the date on which funds are obligated 

to provide support under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense 

shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a notice 

setting forth the following: 

(1) The type of support to be provided. 

(2) The national military forces to be supported. 

(3) The objectives of such support. 

(4) The estimated cost of such support. 

(5) The intended duration of such support. 

(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations 

of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations 

of the House of Representatives. 

(2) The term ‘‘logistic support, supplies, and services’’ has 

the meaning given that term in section 2350(1) of title 10, 

United States Code. 

(f) EXPIRATION.—The authority provided under this section may 

not be exercised after September 30, 2017. 

(g) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY.—Section 1206 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public 

Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1624; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is repealed. 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to 

Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq 

SEC. 1211. COMMANDERS’ EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM IN 

AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) ONE YEAR EXTENSION.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1201 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 

125 Stat. 1619), as amended by section 1221 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 

112–239; 126 Stat. 1992), is further amended by striking ‘‘fiscal 

year 2013’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 

2014’’. 

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading of subsection 

(a) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘FOR FISCAL YEAR

2013’’. 

(b) FUNDS AVAILABLE DURING FISCAL YEAR 2014.—Subsection 

(a) of such section, as so amended, is further amended by striking 

‘‘$200,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$60,000,000’’. 

(c) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR QUARTERLY BRIEFINGS.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended— 

(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘AND BRIEFINGS’’; 

and 

(2) by striking paragraph (3). 
H. R. 3304—234 

(d) REVIEW REQUIRED.—Not later than one year after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General, 

the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, the 

Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, and the Government Accountability Office, shall submit to Congress a comprehensive report on lessons learned and best practices from execution 

of the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program (CERP) from 

Iraq and Afghanistan. 

(e) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—The report required by subsection 

(d) shall include the following: 

(1) A description of any modifications to CERP since the 

commencement of the program. 

(2) A description of CERP best practices and lessons learned 

related to the following: 

(A) Requirements, training, and certifications for CERP 

managers in the field and headquarters. 

(B) Project planning, execution, management, closeout, 

sustainability, and transfer to host government. 

(C) Project approval process, including appropriate 

approval levels for higher-value projects. 

(D) Project monitoring and evaluation. 

(E) Control and accountability of funds. 

(F) Procurement procedures, including local procurement. 

(G) Processes to maintain flexibility and rapid 

implementation of funds, but retain accountability of CERP 

projects. 

(H) Reporting requirements to the Department of 

Defense and Congress. 

(I) Recommendations for the use of CERP in future 

contingency operations. 

(J) Recommendations for developing a CERP handbook 

for use by future CERP administrators. 

(3) A description and assessment of the application of CERP 

practices in the success of reconstruction efforts and of commanders’ pursuit of their missions. 

SEC. 1212. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO USE FUNDS FOR 

REINTEGRATION ACTIVITIES IN AFGHANISTAN. 

Section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4392), 

as most recently amended by section 1218 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 

Stat. 1990), is further amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘$35,000,000’’ and inserting 

‘‘$25,000,000’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘for fiscal year 2013’’ and inserting 

‘‘for fiscal year 2014’’; and 

(2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and 

inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’. 

SEC. 1213. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN COALITION NATIONS FOR SUPPORT PROVIDED TO 

UNITED STATES MILITARY OPERATIONS. 

(a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) of section 1233 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 
H. R. 3304—235 

(Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended 

by section 1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2000), is further 

amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 

2014’’. 

(b) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT AVAILABLE.—Subsection (d)(1) of 

such section 1233, as so amended, is further amended by striking 

‘‘during fiscal year 2013 may not exceed $1,650,000,000’’ and 

inserting ‘‘during fiscal year 2014 may not exceed $1,500,000,000’’. 

(c) EXTENSION OF NOTICE REQUIREMENT RELATING TO

REIMBURSEMENT OF PAKISTAN FOR SUPPORT PROVIDED BY PAKISTAN.—Section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended 

by section 1213(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1630), is further 

amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2014’’. 

(d) EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ON REIMBURSEMENT OF PAKISTAN

PENDING CERTIFICATION ON PAKISTAN.—Subsection (d) of section 

1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2013 (126 Stat. 2000) is amended— 

(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘IN FISCAL YEAR

2013’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Effective as of the date 

of the enactment of this Act,’’ and all that follows through 

‘‘remain available for obligation’’ and inserting ‘‘No amounts 

authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense 

for fiscal year 2014 or any prior fiscal year’’. 

SEC. 1214. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT OPERATIONS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE OFFICE OF 

SECURITY COOPERATION IN IRAQ. 

(a) EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection 

(f) of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘(f)’’ and all that follows through ‘‘fiscal 

year 2013,’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(f) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY FOR ACTIVITIES OF OSCI.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—During fiscal year 2014,’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph 

(2): 

‘‘(2) REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF TRAINING.—The training conducted under paragraph (1) shall include elements that promote 

the following: 

‘‘(A) Observance of and respect for human rights and 

fundamental freedoms. 

‘‘(B) Military professionalism. 

‘‘(C) Respect for legitimate civilian authority within 

Iraq.’’. 

(b) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT.—Subsection (c) of such section 

is amended by striking ‘‘2012’’ and all that follows through the 

period at the end and inserting ‘‘2014 may not exceed 

$209,000,000.’’. 

(c) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—Subsection (d) of such section is 

amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2012 or fiscal year 2013’’ and 

inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2014’’; and 
H. R. 3304—236 

(2) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2012 or 2013, as the case may 

be,’’ and inserting ‘‘that fiscal year’’. 

(d) UPDATES OF REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF OSCI.—Section 

1211(d)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1983) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘UPDATE REQUIRED.—Not later than September 30, 2013,’’ and inserting ‘‘UPDATES REQUIRED.—Not later 

than September 30, 2013, and every 180 days thereafter until 

the authority in section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 expires,’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘including’’ and all that follows and inserting 

‘‘including the following: 

‘‘(A) A description of any changes to the specific element or process described in subparagraphs (A) through 

(F) of paragraph (2). 

‘‘(B) An evaluation of the activities of the Office of 

Security Cooperation in Iraq based on the measures of 

effectiveness described in paragraph (2)(F) and a discussion 

of any determinations to expand, alter, or terminate specific 

activities of the Office based on those measures. 

‘‘(C) An evaluation of the effectiveness of the training 

provided pursuant to section 1215(f)(2) of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 in promoting respect for human rights, military professionalism, 

and respect for legitimate civilian authority in Iraq.’’. 

SEC. 1215. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY 

FOR PROGRAM TO DEVELOP AND CARRY OUT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 1217(f) of the Ike 

Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 

(Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4393), as most recently amended 

by section 1219 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1991), is further 

amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the following 

new subparagraph: ‘‘(C) Up to $250,000,000 made available to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance for fiscal 

year 2014.’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by 

inserting ‘‘, or phase of a project,’’ after ‘‘each project’’; 

(B) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (D); and 

(C) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following 

new subparagraph (C): 

‘‘(C) An assessment of the capability of the Afghan 

National Security Forces (ANSF) to provide security for 

such project after January 1, 2015, including an estimate 

of the ANSF force levels, if any, required to secure such 

project. Such assessment should include the estimated costs 

of providing security and whether or not the Government 

of Afghanistan is committed to providing such security.’’; 

and 

(3) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the following 

new subparagraph: 
H. R. 3304—237 

‘‘(D) In the case of funds for fiscal year 2014, until 

September 30, 2015.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

shall take effect on October 1, 2013. 

(c) REPORT ON TRANSITION OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT.— 

(1) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in 

consultation with the Secretary of State and the Administrator 

of the United States Agency for International Development, 

submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the 

transition to the Government of Afghanistan, or a utility entity 

owned by the Government of Afghanistan, of the project 

management of projects funded with amounts authorized by 

this Act for the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund. Such transition shall be planned to be completed by not later December 

31, 2014. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) 

shall include the following: 

(A) A description of the projects to be transitioned 

as described in that paragraph, the cost of such projects, 

and the timelines for completion and other key implementation milestones for such projects. 

(B) For each such project, the following: 

(i) An estimate of the financial and other requirements necessary to manage such project, and sustain 

the infrastructure developed through such project, on 

an annual basis after the completion of such project. 

(ii) An assessment of the capacity of the Government of Afghanistan or such utility entity to manage 

such project, and maintain and use the infrastructure 

developed through such project, after the completion 

of such project. 

(iii) A description of any arrangements, and an 

estimate of associated costs, to support the Government 

of Afghanistan or such utility entity if the Government 

of Afghanistan or such utility entity, as the case may 

be, lacks the capacity (in either financial or human 

resources) to manage such project, or sustain the infrastructure developed through such project, after the 

completion of such project. 

(C) An assessment of the ministries or organizations 

of Afghanistan that will be responsible for the management 

of such projects after transition, including an assessment 

of any critical institutional shortfalls of such ministries 

and organizations that must be addressed for such ministries and organization to acquire the capacity required 

to assume project management responsibilities for such 

projects. 

SEC. 1216. REQUIREMENT TO WITHHOLD DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

ASSISTANCE TO AFGHANISTAN IN AMOUNT EQUIVALENT 

TO 100 PERCENT OF ALL TAXES ASSESSED BY AFGHANISTAN TO EXTENT SUCH TAXES ARE NOT REIMBURSED 

BY AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) REQUIREMENT TO WITHHOLD ASSISTANCE TO AFGHANISTAN.—An amount equivalent to 100 percent of the total taxes 

assessed during fiscal year 2013 by the Government of Afghanistan 
H. R. 3304—238 

on all Department of Defense assistance shall be withheld by the 

Secretary of Defense from obligation from funds appropriated for 

such assistance for fiscal year 2014 to the extent that the Secretary 

of Defense certifies and reports in writing to the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 

that such taxes have not been reimbursed by the Government 

of Afghanistan to the Department of Defense or the grantee, contractor, or subcontractor concerned. 

(b) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense may waive 

the requirement in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that 

such a waiver is necessary to achieve United States goals in 

Afghanistan. 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 

of Representatives a report on the total taxes assessed during 

fiscal year 2013 by the Government of Afghanistan on all Department of Defense assistance. 

(d) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ASSISTANCE DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘Department of Defense assistance’’ means funds 

provided during fiscal year 2013 to Afghanistan by the Department 

of Defense, either directly or through grantees, contractors, or subcontractors. 

(e) TERMINATION.—This section shall terminate at the close 

of the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives a notification that the United States and Afghanistan have signed a bilateral security agreement and such agreement 

has entered into force. 

SEC. 1217. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN AUTHORITIES FOR SUPPORT OF 

FOREIGN FORCES SUPPORTING OR PARTICIPATING WITH 

THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES. 

(a) LOGISTICAL SUPPORT FOR COALITION FORCES SUPPORTING

UNITED STATES MILITARY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN.—Section 

1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 394), as most recently amended 

by section 1216(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1989), is further 

amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2013’’ and 

inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2014’’; 

(2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘in fiscal year 2013’’ and 

inserting ‘‘during the period beginning on October 1, 2013, 

and ending on December 31, 2014,’’; and 

(3) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ‘‘of fiscal year 2013’’ 

and inserting ‘‘through December 31, 2014’’. 

(b) USE OF ACQUISITION AND CROSS-SERVICING AGREEMENTS

TO LEND CERTAIN MILITARY EQUIPMENT TO CERTAIN FOREIGN

FORCES FOR PERSONNEL PROTECTION AND SURVIVABILITY.—Section 

1202(e) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2413), as 

most recently amended by section 1202(b) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 

Stat. 1621), is further amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2014’’ 

and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’. 
H. R. 3304—239 

SEC. 1218. EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE IRAQI SPECIAL 

IMMIGRANT VISA PROGRAM. 

The Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2007 (8 U.S.C. 1157 note) 

is amended— 

(1) in section 1242, by striking subsection (c) and inserting 

the following: 

‘‘(c) IMPROVED APPLICATION PROCESS.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the Secretary 

of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of 

Defense, shall improve the efficiency by which applications 

for special immigrant visas under section 1244(a), are processed 

so that all steps under the control of the respective departments 

incidental to the issuance of such visas, including required 

screenings and background checks, should be completed not 

later than 9 months after the date on which an eligible alien 

submits all required materials to complete an application for 

such visa. 

‘‘(2) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ability of a Secretary referred to in paragraph (1) to take longer than 9 months to complete those 

steps incidental to the issuance of such visas in high-risk cases 

for which satisfaction of national security concerns requires 

additional time. 

‘‘(d) REPRESENTATION.—An alien applying for admission to the 

United States pursuant to this subtitle may be represented during 

the application process, including at relevant interviews and 

examinations, by an attorney or other accredited representative. 

Such representation shall not be at the expense of the United 

States Government.’’; 

(2) in section 1244— 

(A) in subsection (b)— 

(i) in paragraph (4)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘A recommendation’’ and 

inserting the following: 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided under subparagraph (B), a recommendation’’; and 

(II) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(B) REVIEW PROCESS FOR DENIAL BY CHIEF OF MISSION.— 

‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—An applicant who has been 

denied Chief of Mission approval required by subparagraph (A) shall— 

‘‘(I) receive a written decision that provides, 

to the maximum extent feasible, information 

describing the basis for the denial, including the 

facts and inferences underlying the individual 

determination; and 

‘‘(II) be provided not more than one written 

appeal— 

‘‘(aa) that shall be submitted not more 

than 120 days after the date that the applicant 

receives such decision in writing; and 

‘‘(bb) that may request reopening of such 

decision and provide additional information, 
H. R. 3304—240 

clarify existing information, or explain any 

unfavorable information. 

‘‘(ii) IRAQI SPECIAL IMMIGRANT VISA COORDINATOR.—The Secretary of State shall designate, in the 

Embassy of the United States in Baghdad, Iraq, an 

Iraqi Special Immigrant Visa Coordinator responsible 

for overseeing the efficiency and integrity of the processing of special immigrant visas under this section, 

who shall be given— 

‘‘(I) sufficiently high security clearance to 

review information supporting Chief of Mission 

denials if an appeal of a denial is filed; 

‘‘(II) responsibility for ensuring that an 

applicant described in clause (i) receives the 

information described in clause (i)(I); and 

‘‘(III) responsibility for ensuring that every 

applicant is provided a reasonable opportunity to 

provide additional information, clarify existing 

information, or explain any unfavorable information pursuant to clause (i)(II).’’; and 

(ii) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(5) EVIDENCE OF SERIOUS THREAT.—A credible sworn statement depicting dangerous country conditions, together with 

official evidence of such country conditions from the United 

States Government, should be considered as a factor in determination of whether the alien has experienced or is experiencing an ongoing serious threat as a consequence of the alien’s 

employment by the United States Government for purposes 

of paragraph (1)(D).’’; and 

(B) in subsection (c)(3), by striking subparagraph (C) 

and inserting the following: 

‘‘(C) LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF VISAS.— 

‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The total number of principal 

aliens who may be provided special immigrant status 

under this section after January 1, 2014, shall be not 

more than 2500. 

‘‘(ii) EMPLOYMENT PERIOD.—The 1-year period 

during which the principal alien is required to have 

been employed by or on behalf of the United States 

Government in Iraq under subsection (b)(1)(B) shall 

begin on or after March 20, 2003, and end on or before 

September 30, 2013. 

‘‘(iii) APPLICATION DEADLINE.—The principal alien 

seeking special immigrant status under this subparagraph shall apply to the Chief of Mission in accordance 

with subsection (b)(4) not later than September 30, 

2014.’’; and 

(3) in section 1248, by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(f) REPORT ON IMPROVEMENTS.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the Secretary 

of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of 

Defense, shall submit a report, with a classified annex, if necessary, to— 
H. R. 3304—241 

‘‘(A) the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee 

on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; and 

‘‘(B) the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Armed Services 

of the House of Representatives. 

‘‘(2) CONTENTS.—The report submitted under paragraph 

(1) shall describe the implementation of improvements to the 

processing of applications for special immigrant visas under 

section 1244(a), including information relating to— 

‘‘(A) enhancing existing systems for conducting background and security checks of persons applying for special 

immigrant status, which shall— 

‘‘(i) support immigration security; and 

‘‘(ii) provide for the orderly processing of such 

applications without significant delay; 

‘‘(B) the financial, security, and personnel considerations and resources necessary to carry out this subtitle; 

‘‘(C) the number of aliens who have applied for special 

immigrant visas under section 1244 during each month 

of the preceding fiscal year; 

‘‘(D) the reasons for the failure to process any applications that have been pending for longer than 9 months; 

‘‘(E) the total number of applications that are pending 

due to the failure— 

‘‘(i) to receive approval from the Chief of Mission; 

‘‘(ii) of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 

to complete the adjudication of the Form I–360; 

‘‘(iii) to conduct a visa interview; or 

‘‘(iv) to issue the visa to an eligible alien; 

‘‘(F) the average wait times for an applicant at each 

of the stages described in subparagraph (E); 

‘‘(G) the number of denials or rejections at each of 

the stages described in subparagraph (E); and 

‘‘(H) the reasons for denials by the Chief of Mission 

based on the categories already made available to denied 

special immigrant visa applicants in the denial letter sent 

to them by the Chief of Mission. 

‘‘(g) PUBLIC QUARTERLY REPORTS.—Not later than 120 days 

after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, and every 3 months thereafter, 

the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, 

in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall publish a report 

on the website of the Department of State that describes the efficiency improvements made in the process by which applications 

for special immigrant visas under section 1244(a) are processed, 

including information described in subparagraphs (C) through (H) 

of subsection (f)(2). 

‘‘(h) SENIOR COORDINATING OFFICIALS.— 

‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT TO DESIGNATE.—The Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of 

Defense shall each designate a senior coordinating official, with 

sufficient expertise, authority, and resources, to carry out the 

duties described in paragraph (2), with regard to the issuance 

of special immigrant visas under this subtitle and the Afghan 

Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note). 
H. R. 3304—242 

‘‘(2) DUTIES.—Each senior coordinating official designated 

under paragraph (1) shall— 

‘‘(A) develop proposals to improve the efficiency and 

effectiveness of the process for issuing special immigrant 

visas under this subtitle and the Afghan Allies Protection 

Act of 2009; 

‘‘(B) coordinate and monitor the implementation of such 

proposals; 

‘‘(C) include such proposals in the report required by 

subsection (f) and in each quarterly report required by 

subsection (g); and 

‘‘(D) implement appropriate actions as authorized by 

law to carry out the improvements described in the report 

required by subsection (f). 

‘‘(3) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 days 

after the date of the enactment of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of 

Defense shall each submit to the committees set out in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (f)(1) the name and title 

of the senior coordinating official designated under paragraph 

(1) by each such Secretary, along with a description of the 

relevant expertise, authority, and resources of such official.’’. 

SEC. 1219. IMPROVEMENT OF THE AFGHAN SPECIAL IMMIGRANT VISA 

PROGRAM. 

Section 602(b) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 

(8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) in subparagraph (D)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘A recommendation’’ and inserting 

the following: 

‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided under clause 

(ii), a recommendation’’; and 

(ii) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(ii) REVIEW PROCESS FOR DENIAL BY CHIEF OF MIS- SION.— ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—An applicant who has been 

denied Chief of Mission approval shall— 

‘‘(aa) receive a written decision that provides, to the maximum extent feasible, 

information describing the basis for the denial, 

including the facts and inferences underlying 

the individual determination; and 

‘‘(bb) be provided not more than one written appeal— 

‘‘(AA) that shall be submitted not 

more than 120 days after the date that 

the applicant receives such decision in 

writing; and 

‘‘(BB) that may request reopening of 

such decision and provide additional 

information, clarify existing information, 

or explain any unfavorable information. 

‘‘(II) AFGHAN SPECIAL IMMIGRANT VISA COORDINATOR.—The Secretary of State shall designate, 

in the Embassy of the United States in Kabul, 
H. R. 3304—243 

Afghanistan, an Afghan Special Immigrant Visa 

Coordinator responsible for overseeing the efficiency and integrity of the processing of special 

immigrant visas under this section, who shall be 

given— 

‘‘(aa) sufficiently high security clearance 

to review information supporting Chief of Mission denials if an appeal of a denial is filed; 

‘‘(bb) responsibility for ensuring that an 

applicant described in subclause (I) receives 

the information described in subclause (I)(aa); 

and 

‘‘(cc) responsibility for ensuring that every 

applicant is provided a reasonable opportunity 

to provide additional information, clarify 

existing information, or explain any unfavorable information pursuant to clause (I)(bb).’’; 

and 

(B) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(E) EVIDENCE OF SERIOUS THREAT.—A credible sworn 

statement depicting dangerous country conditions, together 

with official evidence of such country conditions from the 

United States Government, should be considered as a factor 

in determination of whether the alien has experienced or 

is experiencing an ongoing serious threat as a consequence 

of the alien’s employment by the United States Government 

for purposes of subparagraph (A)(iv). 

‘‘(F) REPRESENTATION.—An alien applying for admission to the United States pursuant to this title may be 

represented during the application process, including at 

relevant interviews and examinations, by an attorney or 

other accredited representative. Such representation shall 

not be at the expense of the United States Government.’’; 

(2) in paragraph (4)— 

(A) in the heading, by striking ‘‘PROHIBITION ON FEES.— ’’ and inserting ‘‘APPLICATION PROCESS.—’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the 

date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and 

the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with 

the Secretary of Defense, shall improve the efficiency by 

which applications for special immigrant visas under paragraph (1), are processed so that all steps under the control 

of the respective departments incidental to the issuance 

of such visas, including required screenings and background checks, should be completed not later than 9 months 

after the date on which an eligible alien submits all 

required materials to complete an application for such visa. 

‘‘(B) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 

construed to limit the ability of a Secretary referred to 

in subparagraph (A) to take longer than 9 months to complete those steps incidental to the issuance of such visas 

in high-risk cases for which satisfaction of national security 

concerns requires additional time. 

‘‘(C) PROHIBITION ON FEES.—The Secretary’’; and 
H. R. 3304—244 

(3) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(12) REPORT ON IMPROVEMENTS.— 

‘‘(A) REQUIREMENT FOR REPORT.—Not later than 120 

days after the date of the enactment of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, 

in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit 

to the appropriate committees of Congress a report, with 

a classified annex, if necessary. 

‘‘(B) CONTENTS.—The report required by subparagraph 

(A) shall describe the implementation of improvements to 

the processing of applications for special immigrant visas 

under this subsection, including information relating to— 

‘‘(i) enhancing existing systems for conducting 

background and security checks of persons applying 

for special immigrant status, which shall— 

‘‘(I) support immigration security; and 

‘‘(II) provide for the orderly processing of such 

applications without significant delay; 

‘‘(ii) the financial, security, and personnel considerations and resources necessary to carry out this section; 

‘‘(iii) the number of aliens who have applied for 

special immigrant visas under this subsection during 

each month of the preceding fiscal year; 

‘‘(iv) the reasons for the failure to process any 

applications that have been pending for longer than 

9 months; 

‘‘(v) the total number of applications that are 

pending due to the failure— 

‘‘(I) to receive approval from the Chief of Mission; 

‘‘(II) of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to complete the adjudication of the Form I– 

360; 

‘‘(III) to conduct a visa interview; or 

‘‘(IV) to issue the visa to an eligible alien; 

‘‘(vi) the average wait times for an applicant at 

each of the stages described in clause (v); 

‘‘(vii) the number of denials or rejections at each 

of the stages described in clause (v); and 

‘‘(viii) the reasons for denials by the Chief of Mission based on the categories already made available 

to denied special immigrant visa applicants in the 

denial letter sent to them by the Chief of Mission. 

‘‘(13) PUBLIC QUARTERLY REPORTS.—Not later than 120 days 

after the date of the enactment of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, and every 3 months 

thereafter, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, 

shall publish a report on the website of the Department of 

State that describes the efficiency improvements made in the 

process by which applications for special immigrant visas under 

this subsection are processed, including information described 

in clauses (iii) through (viii) of paragraph (12)(B).’’. 
H. R. 3304—245 

Subtitle C—Matters Relating to 

Afghanistan Post 2014 

SEC. 1221. REPORT ON PLANS TO DISRUPT AND DEGRADE HAQQANI 

NETWORK ACTIVITIES AND FINANCES. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) disrupting and degrading the Haqqani Network should 

be a high priority; and 

(2) the Administration should use the full extent of its 

authority to deny the organization the finances required to 

carry out its activities. 

(b) REPORT ON ACTIVITIES AND PLAN TO DISRUPT AND DEGRADE

HAQQANI NETWORK ACTIVITIES AND FINANCES.— (1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than nine months after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall 

report to the appropriate committees of Congress on activities 

and the plan to disrupt and degrade Haqqani Network activities 

and finances. 

(2) COORDINATION.—The report required by paragraph (1) 

shall be prepared by the Secretary of Defense, in coordination 

with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, 

the Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence, 

and any other department or agency of the United States 

Government that has lead responsibility for activities directed 

at disrupting and degrading the Haqqani Network. 

(3) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall 

include the following: 

(A) A description of the current activities of the Department of Defense, the Department of State, the Department 

of the Treasury, the Department of Justice, and the elements of the intelligence community to disrupt and degrade 

Haqqani Network activities, finances, and resources. 

(B) An assessment of the intelligence community— 

(i) of the operations of the Haqqani Network in 

Afghanistan and Pakistan, and its activities outside 

the region; and 

(ii) of the relationships, networks, and 

vulnerabilities of the Haqqani Network, including with 

Pakistan’s military, intelligence services, and government officials, including provincial and district officials. 

(C) A review of the plans and intentions of the Haqqani 

Network with respect to the continued drawdown of United 

States and coalition troops. 

(D) A review of the current United States policies, 

activities, and funding, and a description of a plan, for 

applying sustained and systemic pressure against the 

Haqqani Network’s financial infrastructure, including— 

(i) identification of the agencies that would participate in implementing the plan; 

(ii) a description of the legal authorities under 

which the plan would be conducted; 

(iii) a description of the objectives and desired 

outcomes of the plan, including specific steps to achieve 

these objectives and outcomes; 

(iv) metrics to measure the success of the plan; 

and 
H. R. 3304—246 

(v) the identity of the agency or office to be designated as the lead agency in implementing the plan. 

(E) An examination of the extent, if any, to which 

current United States and coalition contracting processes 

have furthered the financial interests of the Haqqani Network, and how the activities and plans specified in paragraph (1) would mitigate the unintended consequences of 

such processes. 

(F) An assessment of formal and informal business 

sectors penetrated by the Haqqani Network in Afghanistan, 

Pakistan, and other countries, particularly in the Persian 

Gulf region, and a description of steps to counter these 

activities. 

(G) An estimate of costs associated with the 

implementation of the plan to disrupt and degrade the 

Haqqani Network’s financial activities. 

(H) A description of how activities and plans specified 

in paragraph (1) fit in the broader United States efforts 

to stabilize Afghanistan and prevent the region from being 

a safe haven for al Qaeda and its affiliates. 

(4) UPDATE OF REPORT ON ACTIVITIES AND PLAN.—Not later 

than 180 days after the submission of the report required 

by paragraph (1), the President shall submit an update of 

the report to the appropriate committees of Congress. 

(5) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) and the 

update required by paragraph (4) shall be submitted in 

unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS.—The term 

‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee 

on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

(2) INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.—The term ‘‘intelligence 

community’’ has the meaning given that term in section 3(4) 

of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)). 

SEC. 1222. COMPLETION OF ACCELERATED TRANSITION OF SECURITY 

RESPONSIBILITY FROM UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES 

TO THE AFGHAN NATIONAL SECURITY FORCES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—It is the policy of the United States, in 

coordination with the Government of Afghanistan, North Atlantic 

Treaty Organization (NATO) member countries, and other allies 

in Afghanistan, that— 

(1) the accelerated transition of security responsibility from 

United States Armed Forces to the Afghan National Security 

Forces and the associated draw down of United States Armed 

Forces from Afghanistan shall be completed by not later than 

December 31, 2014; 

(2) the United States shall support an Afghan-led and 

Afghan-owned peace negotiation process leading to a political 

settlement of the conflict in Afghanistan, with the goal of 

establishing a secure and independent Afghanistan and promoting regional security and stability; and 
H. R. 3304—247 

(3) any political settlement resulting from such peace negotiations must result in insurgent groups breaking ties with 

al Qaeda, renouncing violence, and accepting the Afghanistan 

constitution, including its protections for women and minorities. 

(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that, 

before making a public announcement regarding a decision on a 

United States military presence in Afghanistan after December 

31, 2014, the President should consult with Congress regarding 

the size, mission, and estimated duration of such a presence. 

(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 

construed so as to limit or prohibit any authority of the President 

to modify the military strategy, tactics, and operations of United 

States Armed Forces as such Armed Forces draw down from 

Afghanistan. 

SEC. 1223. DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE PLAN. 

(a) PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the 

Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a Department of 

Defense plan regarding covered defense intelligence assets in relation to the drawdown of the United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan. Such plan shall include— 

(1) a description of the covered defense intelligence assets; 

(2) a description of any such assets to remain in Afghanistan after December 31, 2014, to continue to support military 

operations; 

(3) a description of any such assets that will be or have 

been reallocated to other locations outside of the United States 

in support of the Department of Defense; 

(4) the defense intelligence priorities that will be or have 

been addressed with the reallocation of such assets from 

Afghanistan; 

(5) the necessary logistics, operations, and maintenance 

plans to operate in the locations where such assets will be 

or have been reallocated, including personnel, basing, and any 

host country agreements; and 

(6) a description of any such assets that will be or have 

been returned to the United States. 

(b) COVERED DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE ASSETS DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘covered defense intelligence assets’’ means 

Department of Defense intelligence assets and personnel supporting 

military operations in Afghanistan at any time during the oneyear period ending on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 1224. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN 

AUTHORITIES FOR AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) LIMITATION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 

2014 to carry out each of the provisions of law described in 

paragraph (2), not more than 50 percent may be obligated 

or expended until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary 

of Defense submits to the specified congressional committees 

the certification described in subsection (b). 

(2) PROVISIONS OF LAW.—The provisions of law referred 

to in paragraph (1) are the following: 
H. R. 3304—248 

(A) Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 

1619; relating to the Commanders’ Emergency Response 

Program in Afghanistan). 

(B) Section 1217 of the Ike Skelton National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111– 

383; 124 Stat. 4393; relating to authority for program to 

develop and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan). 

(C) Section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 

428; relating to the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund). 

(b) CERTIFICATION DESCRIBED.—The certification referred to in 

subsection (a) is a certification of the Secretary of Defense, in 

consultation with the Secretary of State, that the United States 

and Afghanistan have signed a bilateral security agreement that 

is in the national security interests of the United States. 

(c) NATIONAL SECURITY WAIVER AUTHORITY.—The Secretary 

of Defense may waive the applicability of the limitation in subsection (a)(1) if the Secretary determines that the waiver is in 

the national security interests of the United States. 

(d) SPECIFIED CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—In this section, 

the term ‘‘specified congressional committees’’ means— 

(1) the congressional defense committees; and 

(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

Subtitle D—Matters Relating to Iran 

SEC. 1231. REPORT ON UNITED STATES MILITARY PARTNERSHIP WITH 

GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL COUNTRIES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 

of Representatives a report on the United States military partnership with Gulf Cooperation Council countries. 

(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) An explanation of the steps that the Department of 

Defense has taken and is planning to take to improve the 

coordination, effectiveness, and interoperability of the regional 

missile defense systems and capabilities of the United States 

and Gulf Cooperation Council countries, both bilaterally and 

multilaterally. 

(2) An outline of the defense agreements with Gulf Cooperation Council countries, including caveats and restrictions on 

United States operations. 

(3) An outline of United States efforts in Gulf Cooperation 

Council countries that are funded by overseas contingency operations funding, an explanation of overseas contingency operations funding for such efforts, and a plan to transition overseas 

contingency operations funding for such efforts to long-term, 

sustainable funding sources. 

(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) may be submitted in classified or unclassified form. 
H. R. 3304—249 

SEC. 1232. ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS IN ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY 

POWER OF IRAN. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1245(b)(3) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 

Stat. 2542) is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the 

end and inserting ‘‘; and’’ ; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(E) a description of the structure of Iran’s global network of terrorist and criminal groups and an analysis of 

the capability of such network of groups and how such 

network of groups operates to support and reinforce Iran’s 

grand strategy.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and 

shall apply with respect to reports required to be submitted under 

section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2010, as so amended, on or after that date. 

SEC. 1233. INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE PROGRAMS AT 

TRAINING LOCATIONS IN SOUTHWEST ASIA. 

Section 544(c)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 

U.S.C. 2347c(c)(1)) is amended— 

(1) in the first sentence, by inserting after ‘‘programs’’ 

the following: ‘‘and integrated air and missile defense programs’’; and 

(2) in the second sentence, by adding at the end before 

the period the following: ‘‘and integrated air and missile defense 

training’’. 

Subtitle E—Reports and Other Matters 

SEC. 1241. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR NONCONVENTIONAL ASSISTED RECOVERY CAPABILITIES. 

Section 943(h) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 

Stat. 4579), as amended by section 1205(g) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 

Stat. 1624), is further amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting 

‘‘2015’’. 

SEC. 1242. ELEMENT ON 5TH GENERATION FIGHTER PROGRAM IN 

ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY AND SECURITY DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. 

Section 1202(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2000 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by adding at 

the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(20) The status of the 5th generation fighter program 

of the People’s Republic of China, including an assessment 

of each individual aircraft type, estimated initial and full operational capability dates, and the ability of such aircraft to 

provide air superiority.’’. 
H. R. 3304—250 

SEC. 1243. REPORT ON POSTURE AND READINESS OF THE ARMED 

FORCES TO RESPOND TO AN ATTACK OR OTHER CONTINGENCY AGAINST UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC FACILITIES OVERSEAS. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than April 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State 

and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report on the posture and readiness of the United States Armed Forces to respond to a request 

by the Department of State to supplement or support existing 

embassy security assets in the case of an attack or other contingency 

against a United States diplomatic facility overseas. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall 

include the following: 

(1) A description and assessment of the posture and readiness of the United States Armed Forces that are expected 

or available to be tasked to supplement or support United 

States embassy security, including an assessment of the following: 

(A) Forward deployed assets that are capable of 

responding to an attack or other contingency against a 

United States diplomatic facility overseas. 

(B) Department of Defense support of the efforts of 

the Department of State to improve diplomatic security 

at United States diplomatic facilities overseas (in terms 

of both personnel and installations). 

(C) Potential enhancements of intelligence support to 

ensure that the United States Armed Forces in the vicinity 

of high threat, high risk United States diplomatic facilities 

overseas are in an appropriate posture to respond to an 

attack or other contingency against such facilities. 

(2) A description of any unfulfilled Marine Security Detachment requirements with respect to high threat, high risk United 

States diplomatic facilities overseas, a description and assessment of mitigation efforts to meet such requirements, and 

a schedule for meeting such requirements. 

(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) may be submitted in classified or unclassified form. 

SEC. 1244. LIMITATION ON ESTABLISHMENT OF REGIONAL SPECIAL 

OPERATIONS FORCES COORDINATION CENTERS. 

(a) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 

2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended 

to establish Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers (RSCCs). 

(b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with 

the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional committees 

specified in subsection (c) a report on the following: 

(1) A detailed description of the intent and purpose of 

the RSCCs concept. 

(2) Defined and validated requirements justifying the 

establishment of RSCCs or similar entities within each 

geographic combatant command, to include how such RSCCs 

or similar entities have been coordinated and de-conflicted with 

existing regional and multilateral frameworks or approaches. 
H. R. 3304—251 

(3) The relevance to and coordination with other multilateral engagement activities and academic institutions supported 

by the geographic combatant commanders and the Department 

of State. 

(4) Cost estimates across the Future Years Defense Program for RSCCs or similar entities, to include estimates of 

contributions of participating nations. 

(5) Any legislative authorities that may be needed to establish RSCCs or similar entities. 

(6) Any other matters that the Secretary of Defense or 

Secretary of State determines appropriate. 

(c) SPECIFIED CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The congressional 

committees referred to in subsection (b) are— 

(1) the congressional defense committees; and 

(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 1245. ADDITIONAL REPORTS ON MILITARY AND SECURITY 

DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S 

REPUBLIC OF KOREA. 

(a) REPORT.—Subsection (a) of section 1236 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112– 

81; 125 Stat. 1641), as amended by section 1292 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112– 

239; 126 Stat. 2042), is further amended by striking ‘‘November 

1, 2012, and November 1, 2013,’’ and inserting ‘‘November 1, 2013, 

November 1, 2015, and November 1, 2017,’’. 

(b) UPDATE.—Section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) UPDATE.—The Secretary of Defense shall revise or supplement the most recent report submitted pursuant to subsection 

(a) if, in the Secretary’s estimation, interim events or developments 

occurring in a period between reports required under subsection 

(a) warrant revision or supplement.’’. 

SEC. 1246. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MISSILE DEFENSE COOPERATION 

WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND LIMITATIONS ON 

PROVIDING CERTAIN MISSILE DEFENSE INFORMATION 

TO THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 

(a) FINDING.—Congress finds that the President certified to 

the Senate on February 2, 2011, pursuant to condition (5) of the 

resolution of the Senate giving the advice and consent of the Senate 

to the ratification of the Treaty Between the United States of 

America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further 

Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (commonly 

referred to as the ‘‘New START Treaty’’), signed in Prague on 

April 8, 2010, the following: ‘‘The New START Treaty does not 

require, at any point during which it will be in force, the United 

States to provide to the Russian Federation telemetric information 

under Article IX of the New START Treaty, Part Seven of the 

Protocol, and the Annex on Telemetric Information to the Protocol 

for the launch of (a) any missile defense interceptor, as defined 

in paragraph 44 of Part One of the Protocol to the New START 

Treaty; (b) any satellite launches, missile defense sensor targets, 
H. R. 3304—252 

and missile defense intercept targets, the launch of which uses 

the first stage of an existing type of United States intercontinental 

ballistic missile (ICBM) or submarine-launched ballistic missile 

(SLBM) listed in paragraph 8 of Article III of the New START 

Treaty; or (c) any missile described in clause (a) of paragraph 

7 of Article III of the New START Treaty.’’. 

(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) as stated in declaration (1) of the resolution of the 

Senate giving the advice and consent of the Senate to the 

ratification of the New START Treaty— 

(A) ‘‘further limitations on the missile defense capabilities of the United States are not in the national security 

interest of the United States’’; and 

(B) ‘‘[t]he New START Treaty and the April 7, 2010, 

unilateral statement of the Russian Federation on missile 

defense do not limit in any way, and shall not be interpreted as limiting, activities that the United States Government currently plans or that might be required over the 

duration of the New START Treaty to protect the United 

States pursuant to the National Missile Defense Act of 

1999, or to protect United States Armed Forces and United 

States allies from limited ballistic missile attack, including 

further planned enhancements to the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system and all phases of the Phased 

Adaptive Approach to missile defense in Europe.’’; 

(2) as stated in declaration (2) of the resolution of the 

Senate giving the advice and consent of the Senate to the 

ratification of the New START Treaty, ‘‘the United States will 

welcome steps by the Russian Federation also to adopt a fundamentally defensive strategic posture that no longer views 

robust strategic defensive capabilities as undermining the 

overall strategic balance, and stands ready to cooperate with 

the Russian Federation on strategic defensive capabilities, as 

long as such cooperation is aimed at fostering and in no way 

constrains the defensive capabilities of both sides’’; 

(3) any missile defense cooperation with the Russian Federation should not in any way limit United States’ or NATO’s 

missile defense capabilities, and should be mutually beneficial 

and reciprocal in nature; 

(4) the United States should not provide the Russian Federation with sensitive missile defense information that would 

in any way compromise United States national security, 

including ‘‘hit-to-kill’’ technology and telemetry data for missile 

defense interceptors or target vehicles; and 

(5) the sovereignty of the United States and its ability 

to unilaterally pursue its own missile defense program shall 

be protected. 

(c) LIMITATIONS ON PROVIDING CERTAIN MISSILE DEFENSE

INFORMATION TO THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.— 

(1) CERTAIN ‘‘HIT-TO-KILL’’ TECHNOLOGY AND TELEMETRY

DATA.—No funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise 

made available for fiscal years 2014 through 2016 for the 

Department of Defense may be used to provide the Russian 

Federation with ‘‘hit-to-kill’’ technology and telemetry data for 

missile defense interceptors or target vehicles. 
H. R. 3304—253 

(2) OTHER SENSITIVE MISSILE DEFENSE INFORMATION.—No 

funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may 

be used to provide the Russian Federation with sensitive missile 

defense information that would in any way compromise United 

States national security. 

(3) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—If the Secretary of 

Defense intends to provide the Russian Federation with any 

sensitive missile defense information that the Secretary determines will not compromise United States national security, 

the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees 

of the Secretary’s intent to provide such information not less 

than 7 days prior to the provision of such information, including 

an explanation of the reasons for providing the information 

and the reasons why providing the information will not compromise United States national security. 

SEC. 1247. AMENDMENTS TO ANNUAL REPORT UNDER ARMS CONTROL 

AND DISARMAMENT ACT. 

(a) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—Section 403 of 

the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a) is 

amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘the Speaker of the House 

of Representatives and to the chairman of the Committee on 

Foreign Relations of the Senate’’ and inserting ‘‘the appropriate 

congressional committees’’; 

(2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘Congress’’ and inserting 

‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this section, the term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ 

means— 

‘‘(1) the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee 

on Armed Services, and the Select Committee on Intelligence 

of the Senate; and 

‘‘(2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on 

Armed Services, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.’’. 

(b) CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING.—Section 403 of the Arms Control 

and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a), as amended by subsection 

(a) of this section, is further amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING.—Not later than May 15 of each 

year, the President shall provide to the appropriate congressional 

committees a briefing on the most-recent report required by this 

section.’’. 

SEC. 1248. REPORT ON ACTIONS TO REDUCE SUPPORT FOR BALLISTIC 

MISSILE PROLIFERATION. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) the United States Government should develop a plan 

to reduce the spread of technology and expertise that could 

support the ballistic missile development programs of Iran, 

North Korea, and Syria, as well as any other nation determined 

by the United States Government to be a ballistic missile 

proliferation risk; and 
H. R. 3304—254 

(2) such plan should include efforts to secure the cooperation of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of 

China to help reduce the spread of such ballistic missile technology and expertise. 

(b) REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 240 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in 

consultation with appropriate Federal departments and agencies, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees 

a report on steps that have been taken, and that are planned 

to be taken, to reduce the spread of technology and expertise 

that could support the ballistic missile development programs 

of Iran, North Korea, and Syria, as well as any other nation 

the Secretary determines to be a ballistic missile proliferation 

risk. 

(2) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate 

congressional committees’’ means— 

(A) the congressional defense committees; 

(B) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate 

and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of 

the House of Representatives; and 

(C) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate 

and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 

Representatives. 

(3) FORM.—The report required by this subsection shall 

be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified 

annex, if necessary. 

SEC. 1249. REPORTS ON INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS RELATING TO 

THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

(a) REPORTS REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall semi-annually submit to 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 

of Representatives a report on agreements described in subsection 

(b) which have entered into force, have been amended, or have 

been terminated during the previous 6-month period and with 

respect to which such agreements were previously notified by the 

Secretary of State to the Congress pursuant to section 112b of 

title 1, United States Code (commonly known as the ‘‘Case-Zablocki 

Act’’). 

(b) AGREEMENTS DESCRIBED.—Agreements referred to in subsection (a) are agreements relating to matters primarily or significantly related to or involving the Department of Defense, including, 

but not limited to— 

(1) matters such as where the Department of Defense will 

carry out activities under the agreement; and 

(2) matters such as where Department of Defense personnel 

are able to be present in a foreign country in light of the 

status protections, exemptions, and responsibilities afforded by 

the agreement. 

(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 

construed to supersede the requirements of section 112b of title 

1, United States Code. 

(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect on the 

date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect 

to an agreement described in subsection (b) on or after that date. 
H. R. 3304—255 

(e) TERMINATION.—The section shall terminate at the close 

of December 31, 2019. 

SEC. 1250. REVISION OF STATUTORY REFERENCES TO FORMER NATO 

SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS AND RELATED NATO AGREEMENTS. 

(a) TITLE 10, UNITED STATES CODE.—Section 2350d of title 

10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘NATO Maintenance and Supply Organization’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘NATO Support 

Organization and its executive agencies’’; 

(2) in subsection (a)(1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘Weapon System Partnership Agreements’’ and inserting ‘‘Support Partnership Agreements’’; 

and 

(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘a specific weapon 

system’’ and inserting ‘‘activities’’; and 

(3) in subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e), by striking ‘‘Weapon 

System Partnership Agreement’’ each place it appears and 

inserting ‘‘Support Partnership Agreement’’. 

(b) ARMS EXPORT CONTROL ACT.—Section 21(e)(3) of the Arms 

Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2761(e)(3)) is amended— 

(1) in subparagraphs (A) and (C)(i), by striking ‘‘Maintenance and Supply Agency of the North Atlantic Treaty 

Organization’’ and inserting ‘‘North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Support Organization and its executive agencies’’; 

(2) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ‘‘weapon system 

partnership agreement’’ and inserting ‘‘support partnership 

agreement’’; and 

(3) in subparagraph (C)(i)(II), by striking ‘‘a specific weapon 

system’’ and inserting ‘‘activities’’. 

SEC. 1251. EXECUTIVE AGREEMENTS WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

RELATING TO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that 

any executive agreement between the United States and the Russian Federation relating to ballistic missile defense should not 

limit the development or deployment of ballistic missile defense 

systems or capabilities of the United States or of the North Atlantic 

Treaty Organization. 

(b) BRIEFING.—Prior to signing an executive agreement with 

the Russian Federation relating to ballistic missile defense, the 

President, or the President’s designee, shall brief the congressional 

defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of 

the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House 

of Representatives on the objectives and contents of the executive 

agreement. 

SEC. 1252. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the use 

of force against Syria or Iran. 

SEC. 1253. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT 

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 

2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended 

to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, or to make any change 
H. R. 3304—256 

to existing programs, projects, or activities as approved by Congress 

in furtherance of, pursuant to, or otherwise to implement the Arms 

Trade Treaty, unless the Arms Trade Treaty has received the 

advice and consent of the Senate and has been the subject of 

implementing legislation, as required, by the Congress. 

(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 

construed to preclude the Department of Defense from assisting 

foreign countries in bringing their laws and regulations up to United 

States standards. 

SEC. 1254. REPORT ON MILITARY AND SECURITY DEVELOPMENTS 

INVOLVING THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 

(a) REPORT.—Not later than June 1, 2014, the Secretary of 

Defense shall submit to the specified congressional committees a 

report on the security and military strategy of the Russian Federation. 

(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report required under 

subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) An assessment of the security priorities and objectives 

of Russia. 

(2) The goals and factors shaping Russian security and 

military strategy, including military spending and investment 

priorities. 

(3) An assessment of the Russian military’s force structure. 

(4) Recent developments in Russian military doctrine and 

training. 

(5) The current state of United States military-to-military 

cooperation with Russia’s armed forces, which shall include 

the following: 

(A) A comprehensive and coordinated strategy for such 

military-to-military cooperation. 

(B) A summary of all such military-to-military cooperation during the one-year period preceding the report, 

including a summary of topics discussed. 

(C) A description of such military-to-military cooperation planned for the 12-month period following such report. 

(D) The Secretary’s assessment of the benefits the Russians expect to gain from such military-to-military cooperation. 

(E) The Secretary’s assessment of the benefits the 

Department of Defense expects to gain from such militaryto-military cooperation, and any concerns regarding such 

cooperation. 

(F) The Secretary’s assessment of how such militaryto-military cooperation fit into the larger security relationship between the United States and the Russian Federation. 

(6) A description of Russia’s key military-to-military relationships with other countries, and how these relationships 

fit into Russia’s larger security and military strategy. 

(7) Other military and security developments involving 

Russia that the Secretary of Defense considers relevant to 

United States national security. 

(c) FORM.—The report required under subsection (a) shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

(d) DEFINITION.—In this section the term ‘‘specified congressional committees’’ means— 
H. R. 3304—257 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 

on Foreign Relations of the Senate. 

SEC. 1255. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS OR AGREEMENTS WITH ROSOBORONEXPORT. 

(a) PROHIBITION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 may 

be used to enter into a contract, memorandum of understanding, 

or cooperative agreement with, to make a grant, to, or to provide 

a loan or loan guarantee to Rosoboronexport. 

(b) NATIONAL SECURITY WAIVER AUTHORITY.—The Secretary 

of Defense may waive the applicability of subsection (a) if the 

Secretary determines that such a waiver is in the national security 

interests of the United States. 

(c) REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO USE OF FUNDS PURSUANT TO

WAIVER.— 

(1) NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.— 

Not later than 30 days before obligating funds pursuant to 

the waiver under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to Congress a notice on the obligation of funds pursuant 

to the waiver. 

(2) REPORT.—Not later than 15 days after the submittal 

of the notice under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit 

to Congress a report setting forth the following: 

(A) An assessment of the number, if any, of S–300 

advanced anti-aircraft missiles that Rosoboronexport has 

delivered to the Assad regime in Syria. 

(B) A list of the known contracts, if any, that 

Rosoboronexport has signed with the Assad regime since 

January 1, 2013. 

(d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prohibit the use of funds authorized to be appropriated 

for the Department of Defense to enter into a contract or other 

agreement with Rosoboronexport for the purpose of supplying spare 

parts for the sustained maintenance of helicopters operated by 

the Afghan National Security Forces. 

TITLE XIII—COOPERATIVE THREAT 

REDUCTION 

Sec. 1301. Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and funds. 

Sec. 1302. Funding allocations. 

Sec. 1303. Extension of authority for utilization of contributions to the cooperative 

threat reduction program. 

Sec. 1304. Strategy to modernize cooperative threat reduction and prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the 

Middle East and North Africa region. 

SEC. 1301. SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 

PROGRAMS AND FUNDS. 

(a) SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION PRO- GRAMS.—For purposes of section 301 and other provisions of this 

Act, Cooperative Threat Reduction programs are the programs 

specified in section 1501 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (50 U.S.C. 2362 note). 
H. R. 3304—258 

(b) FISCAL YEAR 2014 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION FUNDS

DEFINED.—As used in this title, the term ‘‘fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds’’ means the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made 

available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative 

Threat Reduction programs. 

(c) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Funds appropriated pursuant to 

the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat 

Reduction programs shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 

2014, 2015, and 2016. 

SEC. 1302. FUNDING ALLOCATIONS. 

(a) FUNDING FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES.—Of the $528,455,000 

authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for 

fiscal year 2014 in section 301 and made available by the funding 

table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs, 

the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified: 

(1) For strategic offensive arms elimination, $5,700,000. 

(2) For chemical weapons destruction, $13,000,000. 

(3) For global nuclear security, $32,808,000. 

(4) For cooperative biological engagement, $306,325,000. 

(5) For proliferation prevention, $136,072,000. 

(6) For threat reduction engagement, $6,375,000. 

(7) For activities designated as Other Assessments/ 

Administrative Costs, $28,175,000. 

(b) REPORT ON OBLIGATION OR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR

OTHER PURPOSES.—No fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds may be obligated or expended for a purpose other than 

a purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) 

until 15 days after the date that the Secretary of Defense submits 

to Congress a report on the purpose for which the funds will 

be obligated or expended and the amount of funds to be obligated 

or expended. Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed 

as authorizing the obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2014 

Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a purpose for which the 

obligation or expenditure of such funds is specifically prohibited 

under this title or any other provision of law. 

(c) LIMITED AUTHORITY TO VARY INDIVIDUAL AMOUNTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), in any case 

in which the Secretary of Defense determines that it is necessary to do so in the national interest, the Secretary may 

obligate amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for a purpose 

listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) in excess 

of the specific amount authorized for that purpose. 

(2) NOTICE-AND-WAIT REQUIRED.—An obligation of funds 

for a purpose stated in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection 

(a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for such purpose 

may be made using the authority provided in paragraph (1) 

only after— 

(A) the Secretary submits to Congress notification of 

the intent to do so together with a complete discussion 

of the justification for doing so; and 

(B) 15 days have elapsed following the date of the 

notification. 

(d) ENHANCED AUTHORITY.— 
H. R. 3304—259 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The percentage limitation specified in 

subsection (a) of section 1305 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (22 U.S.C. 5965) shall 

not apply with respect to amounts appropriated or otherwise 

made available for fiscal year 2014 or 2015 for the Cooperative 

Threat Reduction Program of the Department of Defense to 

the extent that amounts expended in excess of such percentage 

limitation for either such fiscal year are expended for activities 

undertaken under that section with respect to Syria. 

(2) QUARTERLY BRIEFINGS.— 

(A) INITIAL BRIEFING.—Not later than April 15, 2014, 

the Secretary shall provide to the appropriate congressional 

committees a briefing on activities described in subsection 

(a) that includes the following: 

(i) A comprehensive assessment of the chemical 

weapons stockpiles in Syria, including names, types, 

and quantities of chemical weapons agents, types of 

munitions, and location and form of storage, production, and research and development facilities. 

(ii) An assessment of undeclared chemical weapons 

stockpiles, munitions, and facilities. 

(iii) A detailed plan for carrying out such activities. 

(iv) Estimated costs, timelines, and milestones for 

carrying out the plan, including accounting of funds 

expended between September 27, 2013, and the date 

of the initial briefing. 

(v) A discussion of the planned final disposition 

of equipment and facilities procured using funds 

authorized for such activities. 

(vi) A detailed list of pledges made and funds 

received by foreign nations and multilateral organizations. 

(vii) Any other issues or events that reflect the 

current status of the efforts to remove and destroy 

Syria’s chemical weapons. 

(B) SUBSEQUENT BRIEFINGS.—Not later than 90 days 

after providing the briefing required by subparagraph (A), 

and each 90-day period thereafter, the Secretary shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees a briefing 

on the activities carried out under subsection (a) that 

includes the following: 

(i) An accounting of the funds expended as of the 

date of the briefing to carry out such activities. 

(ii) An estimate of the funds that are expected 

to be expended for such activities in the 90-day period 

following the briefing. 

(iii) An identification of recipients of assistance 

pursuant to such activities. 

(iv) A description of the types of equipment and 

services procured in carrying out such activities. 

(v) A detailed list of pledges made and funds 

received by foreign nations and multilateral organizations. 

(vi) Any other issues or events that reflect the 

current status of the efforts to remove and destroy 

Syria’s chemical weapons. 
H. R. 3304—260 

(3) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.— 

In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means the following: 

(A) The congressional defense committees. 

(B) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate 

and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 

Representatives. 

SEC. 1303. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR UTILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 

PROGRAM. 

Section 1303(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2557; 22 U.S.C. 

5952 note) is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2015’’ and 

inserting ‘‘December 31, 2018’’. 

SEC. 1304. STRATEGY TO MODERNIZE COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION AND PREVENT THE PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS 

OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND RELATED MATERIALS IN 

THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA REGION. 

(a) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense, in 

coordination with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of 

Energy, shall establish a comprehensive and broad nonproliferation 

strategy to advance cooperative efforts with the governments of 

countries in the Middle East and North Africa to reduce the threat 

from the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related 

materials. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The strategy required by subsection (a) shall— 

(1) build upon the current activities of the nonproliferation 

programs of the Department of Defense, the Department of 

State, the Department of Energy, and other departments and 

agencies of the Federal Government designed to mitigate the 

range of threats posed by weapons of mass destruction and 

related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region; 

(2) review issues relating to the threat from the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in 

the Middle East and North Africa region on a regional basis 

as well as on a country-by-country basis; 

(3) review the activities and achievements in the Middle 

East and North Africa region of— 

(A) the Cooperative Threat Reduction program of the 

Department of Defense; 

(B) the nonproliferation programs of the Department 

of State and the Department of Energy; and 

(C) programs of other departments and agencies of 

the Federal Government designed to address nuclear, 

chemical, and biological safety and security issues; 

(4) ensure the continued coordination of cooperative nonproliferation efforts within the Federal Government; 

(5) mobilize and leverage additional resources from countries that cooperate with the United States with respect to 

nonproliferation efforts, nongovernmental and multilateral 

organizations, and international institutions; 

(6) include an assessment of what countries are financially, 

materially, or technologically supporting proliferation in the 

Middle East and North Africa region and how the strategy 

will prevent, stop, or interdict such support; 
H. R. 3304—261 

(7) include an estimate of associated costs required to plan 

and execute the proposed cooperative threat reduction activities 

under the strategy; and 

(8) include a discussion of the metrics to measure the 

success of the strategy and such activities in reducing the 

regional threat of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. 

(c) INTEGRATION AND COORDINATION.—The strategy required 

by subsection (a) shall include— 

(1) an assessment of gaps in current cooperative efforts 

to reduce the threat from the proliferation of weapons of mass 

destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North 

Africa region; 

(2) an articulation of the priorities of the United States 

with respect to reducing such threat; 

(3) the establishment of appropriate metrics for determining success with respect to reducing such threat; and 

(4) methods for ensuring that the strategy conforms to 

broader efforts by the United States to reduce the threat from 

weapons of mass destruction. 

(d) CONSULTATIONS.—In establishing the strategy required by 

subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consult with governmental and nongovernmental experts in matters relating to nonproliferation that present a diverse set of views. 

(e) SUBMISSION OF STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 31, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional 

committees the strategy required by subsection (a) and a plan 

for the implementation of the strategy. 

(2) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.— In this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means the following: 

(A) The congressional defense committees. 

(B) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate 

and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 

Representatives. 

(3) FORM.—The strategy and plan required by paragraph 

(1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include 

a classified annex. 

TITLE XIV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

Subtitle A—Military Programs 

Sec. 1401. Working capital funds. 

Sec. 1402. National Defense Sealift Fund. 

Sec. 1403. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense. 

Sec. 1404. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 

Sec. 1405. Defense Inspector General. 

Sec. 1406. Defense Health Program. 

Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile 

Sec. 1411. Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation of a strategic and 

critical materials supply. Sec. 1412. Authority to acquire additional materials for the National Defense 

Stockpile. 

Subtitle C—Other Matters 

Sec. 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois. 
H. R. 3304—262 

Sec. 1422. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home. 

Sec. 1423. Cemeterial expenses. 

Subtitle A—Military Programs 

SEC. 1401. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and 

agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for 

working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding 

table in section 4501. 

SEC. 1402. NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the National Defense Sealift Fund, as specified in the 

funding table in section 4501. 

SEC. 1403. CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, 

DEFENSE. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 

authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for 

fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in 

the funding table in section 4501. 

(b) USE.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for— 

(1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions 

in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense 

Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and 

(2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the 

United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such 

Act. 

SEC. 1404. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, 

DEFENSE-WIDE. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise 

provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, 

Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

SEC. 1405. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise 

provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

SEC. 1406. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding 

table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense in providing for 

the health of eligible beneficiaries. 
H. R. 3304—263 

Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile 

SEC. 1411. USE OF NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE FOR THE CONSERVATION OF A STRATEGIC AND CRITICAL MATERIALS 

SUPPLY. 

(a) PRESIDENTIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSERVATION OF STOCKPILE MATERIALS.—Section 6(a) of the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98e(a)) is amended— 

(1) by redesignating paragraphs (5) and (6) as paragraphs 

(6) and (7), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph (5): 

‘‘(5) provide for the appropriate recovery of any strategic 

and critical materials under section 3(a) that may be available 

from excess materials made available for recovery purposes 

by other Federal agencies;’’. 

(b) USES OF NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE TRANSACTION

FUND.—Section 9(b)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 98h(b)(2)) is 

amended— 

(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) through (L) as subparagraphs (E) through (M), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new 

subparagraph (D): 

‘‘(D) Encouraging the appropriate conservation of strategic 

and critical materials.’’. 

(c) DEVELOPMENT OF DOMESTIC SOURCES.—Section 15(a) of such 

Act (50 U.S.C. 98h–6(a)) is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘and appropriate conservation’’ after 

‘‘development’’. 

SEC. 1412. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE 

NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE. 

(a) ACQUISITION AUTHORITY.—Using funds available in the 

National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund, the National Defense 

Stockpile Manager may acquire the following materials determined 

to be strategic and critical materials required to meet the defense, 

industrial, and essential civilian needs of the United States: 

(1) Ferroniobium. 

(2) Dysprosium Metal. 

(3) Yttrium Oxide. 

(4) Cadmium Zinc Tellurium Substrate Materials. 

(5) Lithium Ion Precursors. 

(6) Triamino-Trinitrobenzene and Insensitive High Explosive Molding Powders. 

(b) AMOUNT OF AUTHORITY.—The National Defense Stockpile 

Manager may use up to $41,000,000 of the National Stockpile 

Transaction Fund for acquisition of the materials specified in subsection (a). 

(c) FISCAL YEAR LIMITATION.—The authority under this section 

is available for purchases during fiscal year 2014 through fiscal 

year 2019. 
H. R. 3304—264 

Subtitle C—Other Matters 

SEC. 1421. AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO JOINT DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE–DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

MEDICAL FACILITY DEMONSTRATION FUND FOR CAPTAIN 

JAMES A. LOVELL HEALTH CARE CENTER, ILLINOIS. 

(a) AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 1406 and available for the Defense 

Health Program for operation and maintenance, $143,087,000 may 

be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department 

of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 

(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection 

(a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated 

as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose 

of such a transfer. 

(b) USE OF TRANSFERRED FUNDS.—For the purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds 

transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of 

the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting 

of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy 

Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as 

a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement 

covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 

Stat. 4500). 

SEC. 1422. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR ARMED FORCES 

RETIREMENT HOME. 

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the 

sum of $67,800,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retirement Home. 

SEC. 1423. CEMETERIAL EXPENSES. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of the Army for fiscal year 2014 for cemeterial expenses, 

not otherwise provided for, in the amount of $45,800,000. 

TITLE XV—AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations 

Sec. 1501. Purpose. 

Sec. 1502. Procurement. 

Sec. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation. 

Sec. 1504. Operation and maintenance. 

Sec. 1505. Military personnel. 

Sec. 1506. Working capital funds. 

Sec. 1507. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 

Sec. 1508. Defense Inspector General. 

Sec. 1509. Defense Health Program. 

Subtitle B—Financial Matters 

Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations. 
H. R. 3304—265 

Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority. 

Subtitle C—Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters 

Sec. 1531. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund. 

Sec. 1532. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. 

Sec. 1533. Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization. 

Sec. 1534. Extension of authority for Task Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan. 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional 

Appropriations 

SEC. 1501. PURPOSE. 

The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations for 

the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 to provide additional 

funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by 

the Armed Forces. 

SEC. 1502. PROCUREMENT. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and the 

Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4102. 

SEC. 1503. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in 

section 4202. 

SEC. 1504. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and 

agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise 

provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the 

funding table in section 4302. 

SEC. 1505. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and 

agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise 

provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding 

table in section 4402. 

SEC. 1506. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and 

agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for 

working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding 

table in section 4502. 

SEC. 1507. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, 

DEFENSE-WIDE. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise 

provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, 

Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 
H. R. 3304—266 

SEC. 1508. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise 

provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 

SEC. 1509. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise 

provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the 

funding table in section 4502. 

Subtitle B—Financial Matters 

SEC. 1521. TREATMENT AS ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS. 

The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are 

in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated 

by this Act. 

SEC. 1522. SPECIAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATIONS.— 

(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of 

Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, 

the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made 

available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal 

year 2014 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year 

(or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so 

transferred shall be merged with and be available for the 

same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. 

(2) LIMITATION.—The total amount of authorizations that 

the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this subsection may not exceed $4,000,000,000. 

(b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—Transfers under this section shall 

be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under 

section 1001. 

(c) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY.—The transfer authority provided 

by this section is in addition to the transfer authority provided 

under section 1001. 

Subtitle C—Limitations, Reports, and 

Other Matters 

SEC. 1531. AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND. 

(a) CONTINUATION OF EXISTING LIMITATIONS ON USE OF FUNDS

IN FUND.—Funds available to the Department of Defense for the 

Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2014 shall be 

subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) 

of section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by 

section 1531(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4424). 

(b) REVISION OF PLAN FOR USE OF AFGHANISTAN SECURITY

FORCES FUND.— (1) REVISION AND PURPOSE.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

revise the plan required by section 1531(e) of the National 
H. R. 3304—267 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 

112–239; 126 Stat. 2056) regarding use of the Afghanistan 

Security Forces Fund through September 30, 2017, to ensure 

that an office or official of the Department of Defense is identified as responsible for each program or activity supported using 

funds available to the Department of Defense through the 

Afghanistan Security Forces Fund. 

(2) SUBMISSION.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional committees the plan as revised 

pursuant to paragraph (1). 

(c) PROMOTION OF RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF WOMEN.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the funds available to the Department 

of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal 

year 2014, no less than $25,000,000 shall be available to be 

used for programs and activities to support the recruitment, 

integration, retention, training, and treatment of women in 

the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF). 

(2) TYPES OF PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES.—Such programs 

and activities may include, but are not limited to— 

(A) efforts to recruit women into the ANSF, including 

the special operations forces; 

(B) programs and activities of the Afghan Ministry 

of Defense Directorate of Human Rights and Gender 

Integration and the Afghan Ministry of Interior Office of 

Human Rights, Gender and Child Rights; 

(C) development and dissemination of gender and 

human rights educational and training materials and programs within the Afghan Ministry of Defense and the 

Afghan Ministry of Interior; 

(D) efforts to address harassment and violence against 

women within the ANSF; 

(E) efforts to increase female security personnel in 

connection with elections in Afghanistan; and 

(F) improvements to infrastructure that address the 

requirements of women serving in the ANSF. 

(d) EQUIPMENT DISPOSAL.— (1) ACCEPTANCE OF CERTAIN EQUIPMENT.—The Secretary 

of Defense may accept equipment procured using funds authorized under prior Acts that was transferred to the security 

forces of Afghanistan and returned by such forces to the United 

States if the Secretary provides written notification to the 

congressional defense committees of the Secretary’s intention 

to accept such equipment. 

(2) TREATMENT AS DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STOCKS.—The 

equipment described in paragraph (1), and equipment not yet 

transferred to the security forces of Afghanistan that is determined by the Commander, Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan (or the Commander’s designee) to no longer 

be required for transfer to such forces, may be treated as 

stocks of the Department of Defense upon notification to the 

congressional defense committees of such treatment. 

(3) REPORTS.— 

(A) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a 

report that details all equipment that was transferred to 
H. R. 3304—268 

the security forces of Afghanistan and returned by such 

forces to the United States, including type of equipment 

and reason for its return. 

(B) SUBSEQUENT REPORTS.—Not later than 30 days 

after the end of the first two fiscal year quarters of fiscal 

year 2014, and not later than 30 days after the end of 

each fiscal half-year thereafter, the Secretary shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a report on the 

equipment accepted under paragraph (1) during such fiscal 

year quarter or half-year, as the case may be. Each report 

shall include, for the period covered by such report, a 

list of all equipment accepted under paragraph (1) that 

was treated as the stocks of the Department pursuant 

to paragraph (2). 

SEC. 1532. JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND. 

(a) USE AND TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Subsections (b) and (c) 

of section 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), 

as in effect before the amendments made by section 1503 of the 

Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4649), shall apply to the 

funds made available to the Department of Defense for the Joint 

Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund for fiscal year 2014. 

(b) TERMINATION OF NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.—Effective 

December 31, 2014, paragraph (4) of subsection (c) of section 1514 

of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), as amended by 

section 1503(c) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4649), 

is repealed. 

(c) EXTENSION OF INTERDICTION OF IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE

DEVICE PRECURSOR CHEMICALS AUTHORITY.—Section 1532(c)(4) of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public 

Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2057) is amended by striking ‘‘December 

31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’. 

(d) SEMIANNUAL OBLIGATIONS AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS.— Not later April 15 and October 15, 2014, the Secretary of Defense 

shall provide to the congressional defense committees a report on 

the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund explaining 

commitments, obligations, and expenditures by line of operation 

during the preceding six months. 

SEC. 1533. FUTURE ROLE OF JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE 

DEFEAT ORGANIZATION. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a report on the future 

plans of the Department of Defense for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (JIEDDO). The Secretary shall 

prepare the report in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff. 

(b) REQUIRED ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection 

(a) shall include the following elements: 

(1) The operational and enduring requirements considered 

in determining the future plans for JIEDDO. 

(2) If the Secretary of Defense plans to discontinue 

JIEDDO— 
H. R. 3304—269 

(A) a description of how JIEDDO’s major programs, 

capabilities, and lines of operations will be integrated into 

other components within the Department of Defense or 

discontinued; and 

(B) a statement of the estimated costs to other components of the Department for any JIEDDO program, capability, or line of operations reassigned to such components. 

(3) If the Secretary of Defense plans to continue JIEDDO— 

(A) a statement of the expected mission of JIEDDO; 

(B) a description of the expected organizational structure for JIEDDO, including the reporting structure and 

lines of operation within the Department and personnel 

strength, including contractors; and 

(C) a statement of the estimated costs and budgetary 

impacts related to implementing any changes to the mission of JIEDDO and its organizational structure. 

(4) A timeline for implementation of the selected alternative 

described in paragraph (2) or (3). 

(5) A description of how the Department will identify and 

incorporate lessons learned from establishing and managing 

JIEDDO and its programs. 

SEC. 1534. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR TASK FORCE FOR BUSINESS 

AND STABILITY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (a) of section 1535 of the Ike 

Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 

(Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4426), as most recently amended 

by section 1533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2058), is further 

amended— 

(1) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘and October 31, 2011, 

October 31, 2012, and October 31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘October 

31 of each of 2011 through 2014’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (8), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2013’’ 

and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’. 

(b) FUNDING.—Subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4) of such subsection, as so amended, is further amended— 

(1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and 

inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new clause: 

‘‘(iii) may not exceed $63,800,000 for fiscal year 

2014.’’. 

(c) ADDITIONAL LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Paragraph (4) of such subsection is further amended— 

(1) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph 

(D); 

(2) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new 

subparagraph (C): 

‘‘(C) LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL

YEAR 2014.—None of the funds available for fiscal year 

2014 pursuant to subparagraph (B)(iii) may be obligated 

to assist the Government of Afghanistan in the purchase 

of equipment, supplies, or materials for mining and oil 

and gas resources during fiscal year 2014 or the installation 

of such equipment, supplies, or materials, until the date 
H. R. 3304—270 

on which the Secretary of Defense certifies to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives that the Government of Afghanistan has 

agreed to reimburse the Government of the United States 

for the amount of any such funds, from royalties received 

from mining or oil and gas contracts awarded by the 

Government of Afghanistan.’’; and 

(3) in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by paragraph 

(1), by inserting ‘‘OF FUNDS ACROSS FISCAL YEARS’’ after ‘‘AVAIL- ABILITY’’. 

(d) CONVERSION OF UPDATE OF IMPLEMENTATION OF TRANSITION

ACTION PLAN FROM QUARTERLY TO BIANNUALLY.—Paragraph (7)(B) 

of such subsection, as so amended, is further amended by striking 

‘‘90 days’’ and inserting ‘‘180 days’’. 

TITLE XVI—INDUSTRIAL BASE 

MATTERS 

Subtitle A—Defense Industrial Base Matters 

Sec. 1601. Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector General of Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1602. Foreign space activities. 

Sec. 1603. Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program. 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Small Business Concerns 

Sec. 1611. Advancing small business growth. 

Sec. 1612. Amendments relating to Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative 

Agreement Program. 

Sec. 1613. Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded to small business 

concerns. 

Sec. 1614. Credit for certain small business subcontractors. 

Sec. 1615. Inapplicability of requirement to review and justify certain contracts. 

Subtitle A—Defense Industrial Base 

Matters 

SEC. 1601. PERIODIC AUDITS OF CONTRACTING COMPLIANCE BY 

INSPECTOR GENERAL OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

(a) REQUIREMENT FOR PERIODIC AUDITS OF CONTRACTING

COMPLIANCE.—The Inspector General of the Department of Defense 

shall conduct periodic audits of contracting practices and policies 

related to procurement under section 2533a of title 10, United 

States Code. 

(b) REQUIREMENT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN SEMI- ANNUAL REPORTS.—The Inspector General of the Department of 

Defense shall ensure that findings and other information resulting 

from audits conducted pursuant to subsection (a) are included in 

the semiannual report transmitted to congressional committees 

under section 8(f)(1) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. 

App.). 

SEC. 1602. FOREIGN SPACE ACTIVITIES. 

(a) CONTRACTS WITH CERTAIN FOREIGN ENTITIES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 135 of title 10, United States 

Code, as amended by section 911(a) of this Act, is further 

amended by adding at the end the following new section: 
H. R. 3304—271 

‘‘§ 2279. Foreign commercial satellite services 

‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided in subsection (b), the 

Secretary of Defense may not enter into a contract for satellite 

services with a foreign entity if the Secretary reasonably believes 

that— 

‘‘(1) the foreign entity is an entity in which the government 

of a covered foreign country has an ownership interest that 

enables that government to affect satellite operations; or 

‘‘(2) the foreign entity plans to or is expected to provide 

launch or other satellite services under the contract from a 

covered foreign country. 

‘‘(b) NOTICE AND EXCEPTION.—The prohibition in subsection 

(a) shall not apply to a contract if— 

‘‘(1) the Secretary determines it is in the national security 

of the United States to enter into such contract; and 

‘‘(2) not later than 7 days before entering into such contract, 

the Secretary, in consultation with the Director of National 

Intelligence, submits to the congressional defense committees 

a national security assessment for such contract that includes 

the following: 

‘‘(A) The projected period of performance (including 

any period covered by options to extend the contract), the 

financial terms, and a description of the services to be 

provided under the contract. 

‘‘(B) To the extent practicable, a description of the 

ownership interest that a covered foreign country has in 

the foreign entity providing satellite services to the Department of Defense under the contract and the launch or 

other satellite services that will be provided in a covered 

foreign country under the contract. 

‘‘(C) A justification for entering into a contract with 

such foreign entity and a description of the actions necessary to eliminate the need to enter into such a contract 

with such foreign entity in the future. 

‘‘(D) A risk assessment of entering into a contract 

with such foreign entity, including an assessment of mission assurance and security of information and a description of any measures necessary to mitigate risks found 

by such risk assessment. 

‘‘(c) DELEGATION OF NOTICE AND EXCEPTION AUTHORITY.—The 

Secretary of Defense may only delegate the authority under subsection (b) to enter into a contract subject to the prohibition under 

subsection (a) to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, or the Under Secretary of Defense 

for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and such authority may 

not be further delegated. 

‘‘(d) FORM OF ASSESSMENTS.—Each assessment under subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include 

a classified annex. 

‘‘(e) COVERED FOREIGN COUNTRY DEFINED.—In this section, 

the term ‘covered foreign country’ means a country described in 

section 1261(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2019).’’. 

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

at the beginning of such chapter, as amended by section 911(b) 
H. R. 3304—272 

of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the 

following item: 

‘‘2279. Foreign commercial satellite services.’’. 

(b) LIMITATION ON CONSTRUCTION ON UNITED STATES TERRITORY OF SATELLITE POSITIONING GROUND MONITORING STATIONS

OF FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS.— 

(1) CERTIFICATION.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—The President may not authorize 

or permit the construction of a global navigation satellite 

system ground monitoring station directly or indirectly controlled by a foreign government (including a ground monitoring station owned, operated, or controlled on behalf of 

a foreign government) in the territory of the United States 

unless the Secretary of Defense and the Director of 

National Intelligence jointly certify to the appropriate 

congressional committees that such ground monitoring station will not possess the capability or potential to be used 

for the purpose of gathering intelligence in the United 

States or improving any foreign weapon system. 

(B) FORM.—Each certification under subparagraph (A) 

shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include 

a classified annex. 

(2) NATIONAL SECURITY WAIVER.—The Secretary of Defense 

and the Director of National Intelligence may jointly waive 

the certification requirement in paragraph (1) for a ground 

monitoring station if— 

(A) the Secretary and the Director jointly determine 

that the waiver is in the vital interests of the national 

security of the United States; and 

(B) the Secretary and the Director ensure that— 

(i) all data collected or transmitted from ground 

monitoring stations covered by the waiver are not 

encrypted; 

(ii) all persons involved in the construction, operation, and maintenance of such ground monitoring stations are United States persons; 

(iii) such ground monitoring stations are not 

located in geographic proximity to sensitive United 

States national security sites; 

(iv) the United States approves all equipment to 

be located at such ground monitoring stations; 

(v) appropriate actions are taken to ensure that 

any such ground monitoring stations do not pose a 

cyber espionage or other threat, including intelligence 

or counterintelligence, to the national security of the 

United States; and 

(vi) any improvements to such ground monitoring 

stations do not reduce or compete with the advantages 

of Global Positioning System technology for users. 

(3) WAIVER REPORT.—For each waiver under paragraph 

(2), the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National 

Intelligence, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall 

jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a 

report containing— 
H. R. 3304—273 

(A) the reason why it is not possible to provide the 

certification under paragraph (1) for the ground monitoring 

stations covered by such waiver; 

(B) an assessment of the impact of the exercise of 

authority under paragraph (2) with respect to such ground 

monitoring stations on the national security of the United 

States; 

(C) a description of the means to be used to mitigate 

any such impact to the United States for the duration 

that such ground monitoring stations are operated in the 

territory of the United States; and 

(D) any other information in connection with the 

waiver that the Secretary of Defense and the Director 

of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Secretary 

of State, consider appropriate. 

(4) NOTICE.—Not later than 30 days before the exercise 

of the authority to waive under paragraph (2) the certification 

requirement under paragraph (1) for a ground monitoring station, the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National 

Intelligence shall jointly provide to the appropriate congressional committees notice of the exercise of such authority and 

the report required under paragraph (3) with respect to such 

ground monitoring station. 

(5) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.— 

In this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 

on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the committee 

on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee 

on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

(6) SUNSET.—Effective on the date that is five years after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, paragraphs (1) through 

(5) are repealed. 

SEC. 1603. PROOF OF CONCEPT COMMERCIALIZATION PILOT PROGRAM. 

(a) PILOT PROGRAM.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through 

the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, 

may establish and implement a pilot program, to be known as 

the ‘‘Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program’’, in accordance with this section. 

(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the pilot program is to accelerate 

the commercialization of basic research innovations from qualifying 

institutions. 

(c) AWARDS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Under the pilot program, the Secretary 

shall make financial awards to qualifying institutions in accordance with this subsection. 

(2) COMPETITIVE, MERIT-BASED PROCESS.—An award under 

the pilot program shall be made using a competitive, meritbased process. 

(3) ELIGIBILITY.—A qualifying institution shall be eligible 

for an award under the pilot program if the institution agrees 

to— 
H. R. 3304—274 

(A) use funds from the award for the uses specified 

in paragraph (5); and 

(B) oversee the use of the funds through— 

(i) a rigorous, diverse review board comprised of 

experts in translational and proof of concept research, 

including industry, start-up, venture capital, technical, 

financial, and business experts and university technology transfer officials; 

(ii) technology validation milestones focused on 

market feasibility; 

(iii) simple reporting on program progress; and 

(iv) a process to reallocate funding from poor performing projects to those with more potential. 

(4) CRITERIA.—An award may be made under the pilot 

program to a qualifying institution in accordance with the 

following criteria: 

(A) The extent to which a qualifying institution— 

(i) has an established and proven technology 

transfer or commercialization office and has a plan 

for engaging that office in the program’s implementation or has outlined an innovative approach to technology transfer that has the potential to increase or 

accelerate technology transfer outcomes and can be 

adopted by other qualifying institutions; 

(ii) can assemble a project management board comprised of industry, start-up, venture capital, technical, 

financial, and business experts; 

(iii) has an intellectual property rights strategy 

or office; and 

(iv) demonstrates a plan for sustainability beyond 

the duration of the funding from the award. 

(B) Such other criteria as the Secretary determines 

necessary. 

(5) USE OF AWARD.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraph (B), the 

funds from an award may be used to evaluate the commercial potential of existing discoveries, including activities 

that contribute to determining a project’s commercialization 

path, including technical validations, market research, 

clarifying intellectual property rights, and investigating 

commercial and business opportunities. 

(B) LIMITATIONS.— 

(i) The amount of an award may not exceed 

$500,000 a year. 

(ii) Funds from an award may not be used for 

basic research, or to fund the acquisition of research 

equipment or supplies unrelated to commercialization 

activities. 

(d) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the establishment 

of the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional 

defense committees and to the Committee on Science, Space, and 

Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee 

on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report 

evaluating the effectiveness of the activities of the pilot program. 

The report shall include— 

(1) a detailed description of the pilot program, including 

incentives and activities undertaken by review board experts; 
H. R. 3304—275 

(2) an accounting of the funds used in the pilot program; 

(3) a detailed description of the institutional selection 

process; 

(4) a detailed compilation of results achieved by the pilot 

program; and 

(5) an analysis of the program’s effectiveness, with data 

supporting the analysis. 

(e) QUALIFYING INSTITUTION DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘‘qualifying institution’’ means a nonprofit institution, as defined 

in section 4(3) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act 

of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3703(3)), or a Federal laboratory, as defined 

in section 4(4) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act 

of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3703(4)). 

(f) LIMITATION.—Not more than $5,000,000 may be obligated 

or expended to conduct the pilot program under this section. 

(g) TERMINATION.—The pilot program conducted under this section shall terminate on September 30, 2018. 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Small 

Business Concerns 

SEC. 1611. ADVANCING SMALL BUSINESS GROWTH. 

(a) ADVANCING SMALL BUSINESS GROWTH.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 142 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended— 

(A) by redesignating section 2419 as section 2420; and 

(B) by inserting after section 2418 the following new 

section 2419: 

‘‘§ 2419. Advancing small business growth 

‘‘(a) CONTRACT CLAUSE REQUIRED.—(1) The Under Secretary 

of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall require 

the clause described in paragraph (2) to be included in each covered 

contract awarded by the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(2) The clause described in this paragraph is a clause that— 

‘‘(A) requires the contractor to acknowledge that acceptance 

of the contract may cause the business to exceed the applicable 

small business size standards (established pursuant to section 

3(a) of the Small Business Act) for the industry concerned 

and that the contractor may no longer qualify as a small 

business concern for that industry; and 

‘‘(B) encourages the contractor to develop capabilities and 

characteristics typically desired in contractors that are competitive as an other-than-small business in that industry. 

‘‘(b) AVAILABILITY OF ASSISTANCE.—Covered small businesses 

may be provided assistance as part of any procurement technical 

assistance furnished pursuant to this chapter. 

‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘covered contract’ means a contract— 

‘‘(A) awarded to a qualified small business concern 

as defined pursuant to section 3(a) of the Small Business 

Act; and 

‘‘(B) with an estimated annual value— 

‘‘(i) that will exceed the applicable receipt-based 

small business size standard; or 
H. R. 3304—276 

‘‘(ii) if the contract is in an industry with an 

employee-based size standard, that will exceed 

$70,000,000. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘covered small business’ means a qualified 

small business concern as defined pursuant to section 3(a) 

of the Small Business Act that has entered into a contract 

with the Department of Defense that includes a contract clause 

described in subsection (a)(2).’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 

beginning of such chapter is amended by striking the item 

relating to section 2419 and inserting the following: 

‘‘2419. Advancing small business growth. 

‘‘2420. Regulations.’’. 

(b) EXCEPTION TO LIMITATION ON FUNDING.—Section 2414 of 

such title is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘The value’’ and inserting 

‘‘Except as provided in subsection (c), the value’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection 

(c): 

‘‘(c) EXCEPTION.—The value of the assistance provided in accordance with section 2419(b) of this title is not subject to the limitations 

in subsection (a).’’. 

(c) REVISIONS TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.— 

(1) FULL FUNDING ALLOWED FOR CERTAIN ASSISTANCE.— 

Section 2413(b) of such title is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘except that in the case’’ and inserting: 

‘‘except that— 

‘‘(1) in the case’’; 

(B) by striking the period at the end and inserting 

‘‘; and’’; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) in the case of a program sponsored by such an entity 

that provides assistance for covered small businesses pursuant 

to section 2419(b) of this title, the Secretary may agree to 

furnish the full cost of such assistance.’’. 

(2) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS.—Section 2413 of such 

title is further amended by adding at the end the following 

new subsection: 

‘‘(e) In determining the level of funding to provide under an 

agreement under subsection (b), the Secretary shall consider the 

forecast by the eligible entity of demand for procurement technical 

assistance, and, in the case of an established program under this 

chapter, the outlays and receipts of such program during prior 

years of operation.’’. 

(3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2413(d) of such title 

is amended by striking ‘‘and in determining the level of funding 

to provide under an agreement under subsection (b),’’. 

(d) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 15, of 2015, 

2016, and 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report on the implementation 

of the amendments made by this section, along with any recommendations for improving the Procurement Technical Assistance 

Cooperative Agreement Program. 
H. R. 3304—277 

SEC. 1612. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO PROCUREMENT TECHNICAL 

ASSISTANCE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PROGRAM. 

(a) INCREASE IN GOVERNMENT SHARE.—Section 2413(b) of title 

10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘one-half’’ both places it appears and 

inserting ‘‘65 percent’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘three-fourths’’ and inserting ‘‘75 percent’’. 

(b) INCREASE IN LIMITATIONS ON VALUE OF ASSISTANCE.—Section 2414(a) of such title is amended— 

(1) in paragraphs (1) and (4), by striking ‘‘$600,000’’ and 

inserting ‘‘$750,000’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘$300,000’’ and inserting 

‘‘$450,000’’; and 

(3) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘$150,000’’ and inserting 

‘‘$300,000’’. 

SEC. 1613. REPORTING ON GOALS FOR PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS 

AWARDED TO SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS. 

Subsection (h)(1) of section 15 of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 644) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subparagraph (B); 

(2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (C) 

and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(D) a remediation plan with proposed new practices 

to better meet such goals, including analysis of factors 

leading to any failure to achieve such goals.’’. 

SEC. 1614. CREDIT FOR CERTAIN SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTORS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 637(d)) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (6)(D), by adding before the semicolon 

at the end the following: ‘‘, and assurances at a minimum 

that the offeror or bidder, and all subcontractors required to 

maintain subcontracting plans pursuant to this paragraph, 

will— 

‘‘(i) review and approve subcontracting plans submitted 

by their subcontractors; 

‘‘(ii) monitor subcontractor compliance with their 

approved subcontracting plans; 

‘‘(iii) ensure that subcontracting reports are submitted 

by their subcontractors when required; 

‘‘(iv) acknowledge receipt of their subcontractors’ 

reports; 

‘‘(v) compare the performance of their subcontractors 

to subcontracting plans and goals; and 

‘‘(vi) discuss performance with subcontractors when 

necessary to ensure their subcontractors make a good faith 

effort to comply with their subcontracting plans’’; 

(2) in paragraph (6)(F), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(3) by redesignating subparagraph (G) of paragraph (6) 

as subparagraph (H), and inserting after subparagraph (F) 

of paragraph (6) the following new subparagraph (G): 

‘‘(G) a recitation of the types of records the successful 

offeror or bidder will maintain to demonstrate procedures which 

have been adopted to ensure subcontractors at all tiers comply 
H. R. 3304—278 

with the requirements and goals set forth in the plan established in accordance with subparagraph (D) of this paragraph, 

including— 

‘‘(i) the establishment of source lists of small business 

concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled 

by veterans, small business concerns owned and controlled 

by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small 

business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled 

by women; and 

‘‘(ii) efforts to identify and award subcontracts to such 

small business concerns; and’’; 

(4) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(16) CREDIT FOR CERTAIN SUBCONTRACTORS.— 

‘‘(A) For purposes of determining whether or not a prime 

contractor has attained the percentage goals specified in paragraph (6)— 

‘‘(i) if the subcontracting goals pertain only to a single 

contract with the executive agency, the prime contractor 

shall receive credit for small business concerns performing 

as first tier subcontractors or subcontractors at any tier 

pursuant to the subcontracting plans required under paragraph (6)(D) in an amount equal to the dollar value of 

work awarded to such small business concerns; and 

‘‘(ii) if the subcontracting goals pertain to more than 

one contract with one or more executive agencies, or to 

one contract with more than one executive agency, the 

prime contractor may only count first tier subcontractors 

that are small business concerns. 

‘‘(B) Nothing in this paragraph shall abrogate the responsibility of a prime contractor to make a good-faith effort to 

achieve the first tier small business subcontracting goals negotiated under paragraph (6)(A), or the requirement for subcontractors with further opportunities for subcontracting to 

make a good-faith effort to achieve the goals established under 

paragraph (6)(D).’’. 

(b) DEFINITIONS PERTAINING TO SUBCONTRACTING.—Section 3 

of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632) is amended by adding 

at the end the following: 

‘‘(dd) DEFINITIONS PERTAINING TO SUBCONTRACTING.—In this 

Act: 

‘‘(1) SUBCONTRACT.—The term ‘subcontract’ means a legally 

binding agreement between a contractor that is already under 

contract to another party to perform work, and a third party, 

hereinafter referred to as the subcontractor, for the subcontractor to perform a part, or all, of the work that the contractor 

has undertaken. 

‘‘(2) FIRST TIER SUBCONTRACTOR.—The term ‘first tier subcontractor’ means a subcontractor who has a subcontract 

directly with the prime contractor. 

‘‘(3) AT ANY TIER.—The term ‘at any tier’ means any subcontractor other than a subcontractor who is a first tier subcontractor.’’. 

(c) IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE.— (1) REQUIREMENT FOR PLAN.—Not later than 180 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of 
H. R. 3304—279 

the Small Business Administration, the Secretary of Defense, 

and the Administrator of General Services shall submit to 

the Committee on Small Business and the Committee on Armed 

Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee 

on Small Business and Entrepreneurship and the Committee 

on Armed Services of the Senate a plan to implement this 

section and the amendments made by this section. The plan 

shall contain assurances that the appropriate tracking mechanisms are in place to enable transparency of subcontracting 

activities at all tiers. 

(2) COMPLETION OF PLAN ACTIONS.—Not later than one 

year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, the Secretary 

of Defense, and the Administrator of General Services shall 

complete the actions required by the plan. 

(3) REGULATIONS.—No later than 18 months after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Small 

Business Administration shall promulgate any regulations necessary, and the Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be revised, 

to implement this section and the amendments made by this 

section. 

(4) APPLICABILITY.—Any regulations promulgated pursuant 

to paragraph (3) shall apply to contracts entered into after 

the last day of the fiscal year in which the regulations are 

promulgated. 

SEC. 1615. INAPPLICABILITY OF REQUIREMENT TO REVIEW AND JUSTIFY CERTAIN CONTRACTS. 

In the case of a contract to which the provisions of section 

46 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657s) apply, the requirements under section 802 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1824; 

10 U.S.C. 2304 note) do not apply. 

TITLE XVII—SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE AND RELATED 

REFORMS 

Subtitle A—Reform of Uniform Code of Military Justice 

Sec. 1701. Extension of crime victims’ rights to victims of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

Sec. 1702. Revision of Article 32 and Article 60, Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

Sec. 1703. Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial by court-martial 

for additional offenses involving sex-related crimes. 

Sec. 1704. Defense counsel interview of victim of an alleged sex-related offense in 

presence of trial counsel, counsel for the victim, or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate. 

Sec. 1705. Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses and trial of such 

offenses by general courts-martial. 

Sec. 1706. Participation by victim in clemency phase of courts-martial process. 

Sec. 1707. Repeal of the offense of consensual sodomy under the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice. 

Sec. 1708. Modification of Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate factor relating to 

character and military service of the accused in rule on initial disposition of offenses. 

Sec. 1709. Prohibition of retaliation against members of the Armed Forces for reporting a criminal offense. 
H. R. 3304—280 

Subtitle B—Other Amendments to Title 10, United States Code 

Sec. 1711. Prohibition on service in the Armed Forces by individuals who have been 

convicted of certain sexual offenses. 

Sec. 1712. Issuance of regulations applicable to the Coast Guard regarding consideration of request for permanent change of station or unit transfer by 

victim of sexual assault. 

Sec. 1713. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member of the 

Armed Forces on active duty who is accused of committing a sexual assault or related offense. 

Sec. 1714. Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to protected communications of members of the Armed Forces and prohibited retaliatory actions. 

Sec. 1715. Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory personnel actions taken in response to making protected communications regarding 

sexual assault. 

Sec. 1716. Designation and availability of Special Victims’ Counsel for victims of 

sex-related offenses. 

Subtitle C—Amendments to Other Laws 

Sec. 1721. Tracking of compliance of commanding officers in conducting organizational climate assessments for purposes of preventing and responding to 

sexual assaults. 

Sec. 1722. Advancement of submittal deadline for report of independent panel on 

assessment of military response systems to sexual assault. 

Sec. 1723. Retention of certain forms in connection with Restricted Reports and 

Unrestricted Reports on sexual assault involving members of the Armed 

Forces. 

Sec. 1724. Timely access to Sexual Assault Response Coordinators by members of 

the National Guard and Reserves. 

Sec. 1725. Qualifications and selection of Department of Defense sexual assault 

prevention and response personnel and required availability of Sexual 

Assault Nurse Examiners. 

Sec. 1726. Additional responsibilities of Sexual Assault Prevention and Response 

Office for Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response program. 

Subtitle D—Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports 

Sec. 1731. Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of Military Justice and judicial proceedings of sexual assault cases. 

Sec. 1732. Review and policy regarding Department of Defense investigative practices in response to allegations of Uniform Code of Military Justice violations. 

Sec. 1733. Review of training and education provided members of the Armed Forces 

on sexual assault prevention and response. 

Sec. 1734. Report on implementation of Department of Defense policy on the retention of and access to evidence and records relating to sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1735. Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity 

role in sexual harassment cases. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Sec. 1741. Enhanced protections for prospective members and new members of the 

Armed Forces during entry-level processing and training. 

Sec. 1742. Commanding officer action on reports on sexual offenses involving members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1743. Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response to unrestricted report of sexual assault in which the victim is a member of the Armed 

Forces. 

Sec. 1744. Review of decisions not to refer charges of certain sex-related offenses 

for trial by court-martial. 

Sec. 1745. Inclusion and command review of information on sex-related offenses in 

personnel service records of members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1746. Prevention of sexual assault at military service academies. 

Sec. 1747. Required notification whenever members of the Armed Forces are completing Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National Security Positions. 

Subtitle F—Sense of Congress Provisions 

Sec. 1751. Sense of Congress on commanding officer responsibility for command climate free of retaliation. 
H. R. 3304—281 

Sec. 1752. Sense of Congress on disposition of charges involving certain sexual misconduct offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice through 

courts-martial. 

Sec. 1753. Sense of Congress on the discharge in lieu of court-martial of members 

of the Armed Forces who commit sex-related offenses. 

Subtitle A—Reform of Uniform Code of 

Military Justice 

SEC. 1701. EXTENSION OF CRIME VICTIMS’ RIGHTS TO VICTIMS OF 

OFFENSES UNDER THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE. 

(a) VICTIMS’ RIGHTS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 47 of title 10, 

United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), 

is amended by adding at the end the following new section 

(article): 

‘‘§ 806b. Art. 6b. Rights of the victim of an offense under 

this chapter 

‘‘(a) RIGHTS OF A VICTIM OF AN OFFENSE UNDER THIS

CHAPTER.—A victim of an offense under this chapter has the following rights: 

‘‘(1) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused. 

‘‘(2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice 

of any of the following: 

‘‘(A) A public hearing concerning the continuation of 

confinement prior to trial of the accused. 

‘‘(B) A preliminary hearing under section 832 of this 

title (article 32) relating to the offense. 

‘‘(C) A court-martial relating to the offense. 

‘‘(D) A public proceeding of the service clemency and 

parole board relating to the offense. 

‘‘(E) The release or escape of the accused, unless such 

notice may endanger the safety of any person. 

‘‘(3) The right not to be excluded from any public hearing 

or proceeding described in paragraph (2) unless the military 

judge or investigating officer, as applicable, after receiving clear 

and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the 

victim of an offense under this chapter would be materially 

altered if the victim heard other testimony at that hearing 

or proceeding. 

‘‘(4) The right to be reasonably heard at any of the following: 

‘‘(A) A public hearing concerning the continuation of 

confinement prior to trial of the accused. 

‘‘(B) A sentencing hearing relating to the offense. 

‘‘(C) A public proceeding of the service clemency and 

parole board relating to the offense. 

‘‘(5) The reasonable right to confer with the counsel representing the Government at any proceeding described in paragraph (2). 

‘‘(6) The right to receive restitution as provided in law. 

‘‘(7) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay. 

‘‘(8) The right to be treated with fairness and with respect 

for the dignity and privacy of the victim of an offense under 

this chapter. 
H. R. 3304—282 

‘‘(b) VICTIM OF AN OFFENSE UNDER THIS CHAPTER DEFINED.— 

In this section, the term ‘victim of an offense under this chapter’ 

means a person who has suffered direct physical, emotional, or 

pecuniary harm as a result of the commission of an offense under 

this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

‘‘(c) LEGAL GUARDIAN FOR CERTAIN VICTIMS.—In the case of 

a victim of an offense under this chapter who is under 18 years 

of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or deceased, the military judge 

shall designate a legal guardian from among the representatives 

of the estate of the victim, a family member, or other suitable 

person to assume the victim’s rights under this section. However, 

in no event may the person so designated be the accused. 

‘‘(d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section (article) 

shall be construed— 

‘‘(1) to authorize a cause of action for damages; or 

‘‘(2) to create, to enlarge, or to imply any duty or obligation 

to any victim of an offense under this chapter or other person 

for the breach of which the United States or any of its officers 

or employees could be held liable in damages.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 

beginning of subchapter I of chapter 47 of such title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by adding at the 

end the following new item: 

‘‘806b. Art. 6b. Rights of the victim of an offense under this chapter.’’. 

(b) IMPLEMENTATION.— 

(1) ISSUANCE.—Not later than one year after the date of 

the enactment of this Act— 

(A) the Secretary of Defense shall recommend to the 

President changes to the Manual for Courts-Martial to 

implement section 806b of title 10, United States Code 

(article 6b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as 

added by subsection (a); and 

(B) the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to the Coast Guard when it 

is not operating as a service in the Navy) shall prescribe 

such regulations as each such Secretary considers appropriate to implement such section. 

(2) MECHANISMS FOR AFFORDING RIGHTS.—The recommendations and regulations required by paragraph (1) shall 

include the following: 

(A) Mechanisms for ensuring that victims are notified 

of, and accorded, the rights specified in section 806b of 

title 10, United States Code (article 6b of the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a). 

(B) Mechanisms for ensuring that members of the 

Armed Forces and civilian personnel of the Department 

of Defense and the Coast Guard make their best efforts 

to ensure that victims are notified of, and accorded, the 

rights specified in such section. 

(C) Mechanisms for the enforcement of such rights, 

including mechanisms for application for such rights and 

for consideration and disposition of applications for such 

rights. 

(D) The designation of an authority within each Armed 

Force to receive and investigate complaints relating to the 

provision or violation of such rights. 
H. R. 3304—283 

(E) Disciplinary sanctions for members of the Armed 

Forces and other personnel of the Department of Defense 

and Coast Guard who willfully or wantonly fail to comply 

with requirements relating to such rights. 

SEC. 1702. REVISION OF ARTICLE 32 AND ARTICLE 60, UNIFORM CODE 

OF MILITARY JUSTICE. 

(a) USE OF PRELIMINARY HEARINGS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 832 of title 10, United States 

Code (article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 832. Art. 32. Preliminary hearing 

‘‘(a) PRELIMINARY HEARING REQUIRED.—(1) No charge or specification may be referred to a general court-martial for trial until 

completion of a preliminary hearing. 

‘‘(2) The purpose of the preliminary hearing shall be limited 

to the following: 

‘‘(A) Determining whether there is probable cause to believe 

an offense has been committed and the accused committed 

the offense. 

‘‘(B) Determining whether the convening authority has 

court-martial jurisdiction over the offense and the accused. 

‘‘(C) Considering the form of charges. 

‘‘(D) Recommending the disposition that should be made 

of the case. 

‘‘(b) HEARING OFFICER.—(1) A preliminary hearing under subsection (a) shall be conducted by an impartial judge advocate certified under section 827(b) of this title (article 27(b)) whenever 

practicable or, in exceptional circumstances in which the interests 

of justice warrant, by an impartial hearing officer who is not a 

judge advocate. If the hearing officer is not a judge advocate, 

a judge advocate certified under section 827(b) of this title (article 

27(b)) shall be available to provide legal advice to the hearing 

officer. 

‘‘(2) Whenever practicable, when the judge advocate or other 

hearing officer is detailed to conduct the preliminary hearing, the 

officer shall be equal to or senior in grade to military counsel 

detailed to represent the accused or the Government at the preliminary hearing. 

‘‘(c) REPORT OF RESULTS.—After conducting a preliminary 

hearing under subsection (a), the judge advocate or other officer 

conducting the preliminary hearing shall prepare a report that 

addresses the matters specified in subsections (a)(2) and (f). 

‘‘(d) RIGHTS OF ACCUSED AND VICTIM.—(1) The accused shall 

be advised of the charges against the accused and of the accused’s 

right to be represented by counsel at the preliminary hearing under 

subsection (a). The accused has the right to be represented at 

the preliminary hearing as provided in section 838 of this title 

(article 38) and in regulations prescribed under that section. 

‘‘(2) The accused may cross-examine witnesses who testify at 

the preliminary hearing and present additional evidence in defense 

and mitigation, relevant to the limited purposes of the hearing, 

as provided for in paragraph (4) and subsection (a)(2). 

‘‘(3) A victim may not be required to testify at the preliminary 

hearing. A victim who declines to testify shall be deemed to be 

not available for purposes of the preliminary hearing. 
H. R. 3304—284 

‘‘(4) The presentation of evidence and examination (including 

cross-examination) of witnesses at a preliminary hearing shall be 

limited to the matters relevant to the limited purposes of the 

hearing, as provided in subsection (a)(2). 

‘‘(e) RECORDING OF PRELIMINARY HEARING.—A preliminary 

hearing under subsection (a) shall be recorded by a suitable 

recording device. The victim may request the recording and shall 

have access to the recording as prescribed by the Manual for CourtsMartial. 

‘‘(f) EFFECT OF EVIDENCE OF UNCHARGED OFFENSE.—If evidence 

adduced in a preliminary hearing under subsection (a) indicates 

that the accused committed an uncharged offense, the hearing 

officer may consider the subject matter of that offense without 

the accused having first been charged with the offense if the 

accused— 

‘‘(1) is present at the preliminary hearing; 

‘‘(2) is informed of the nature of each uncharged offense 

considered; and 

‘‘(3) is afforded the opportunities for representation, crossexamination, and presentation consistent with subsection (d). 

‘‘(g) EFFECT OF VIOLATION.—The requirements of this section 

are binding on all persons administering this chapter, but failure 

to follow the requirements does not constitute jurisdictional error. 

‘‘(h) VICTIM DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘victim’ means 

a person who— 

‘‘(1) is alleged to have suffered a direct physical, emotional, 

or pecuniary harm as a result of the matters set forth in 

a charge or specification being considered; and 

‘‘(2) is named in one of the specifications.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 

beginning of subchapter VI of chapter 47 of such title is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 832 and 

inserting the following new item: 

‘‘832. Art 32. Preliminary hearing.’’. 

(b) ELIMINATION OF UNLIMITED COMMAND PREROGATIVE AND

DISCRETION; IMPOSITION OF ADDITIONAL LIMITATIONS.—Subsection 

(c) of section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 60 of 

the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(c)(1) Under regulations of the Secretary concerned, a commissioned officer commanding for the time being, a successor in command, or any person exercising general court-martial jurisdiction 

may act under this section in place of the convening authority. 

‘‘(2)(A) Action on the sentence of a court-martial shall be taken 

by the convening authority or by another person authorized to 

act under this section. Subject to regulations of the Secretary concerned, such action may be taken only after consideration of any 

matters submitted by the accused under subsection (b) or after 

the time for submitting such matters expires, whichever is earlier. 

‘‘(B) Except as provided in paragraph (4), the convening 

authority or another person authorized to act under this section 

may approve, disapprove, commute, or suspend the sentence of 

the court-martial in whole or in part. 

‘‘(C) If the convening authority or another person authorized 

to act under this section acts to disapprove, commute, or suspend, 

in whole or in part, the sentence of the court-martial for an offense 

(other than a qualifying offense), the convening authority or other 
H. R. 3304—285 

person shall provide, at that same time, a written explanation 

of the reasons for such action. The written explanation shall be 

made a part of the record of the trial and action thereon. 

‘‘(3)(A) Action on the findings of a court-martial by the convening authority or by another person authorized to act under 

this section is not required. 

‘‘(B) If the convening authority or another person authorized 

to act under this section acts on the findings of a court-martial, 

the convening authority or other person— 

‘‘(i) may not dismiss any charge or specification, other 

than a charge or specification for a qualifying offense, by setting 

aside a finding of guilty thereto; or 

‘‘(ii) may not change a finding of guilty to a charge or 

specification, other than a charge or specification for a qualifying offense, to a finding of guilty to an offense that is a 

lesser included offense of the offense stated in the charge or 

specification. 

‘‘(C) If the convening authority or another person authorized 

to act under this section acts on the findings to dismiss or change 

any charge or specification for an offense (other than a qualifying 

offense), the convening authority or other person shall provide, 

at that same time, a written explanation of the reasons for such 

action. The written explanation shall be made a part of the record 

of the trial and action thereon. 

‘‘(D)(i) In this subsection, the term ‘qualifying offense’ means, 

except in the case of an offense excluded pursuant to clause (ii), 

an offense under this chapter for which— 

‘‘(I) the maximum sentence of confinement that may be 

adjudged does not exceed two years; and 

‘‘(II) the sentence adjudged does not include dismissal, a 

dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge, or confinement for more 

than six months. 

‘‘(ii) Such term does not include any of the following: 

‘‘(I) An offense under subsection (a) or (b) of section 920 

of this title (article 120). 

‘‘(II) An offense under section 920b or 925 of this title 

(articles 120b and 125). 

‘‘(III) Such other offenses as the Secretary of Defense may 

specify by regulation. 

‘‘(4)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B) or (C), the 

convening authority or another person authorized to act under 

this section may not disapprove, commute, or suspend in whole 

or in part an adjudged sentence of confinement for more than 

six months or a sentence of dismissal, dishonorable discharge, or 

bad conduct discharge. 

‘‘(B) Upon the recommendation of the trial counsel, in recognition of the substantial assistance by the accused in the investigation 

or prosecution of another person who has committed an offense, 

the convening authority or another person authorized to act under 

this section shall have the authority to disapprove, commute, or 

suspend the adjudged sentence in whole or in part, even with 

respect to an offense for which a mandatory minimum sentence 

exists. 

‘‘(C) If a pre-trial agreement has been entered into by the 

convening authority and the accused, as authorized by Rule for 

Courts–Martial 705, the convening authority or another person 

authorized to act under this section shall have the authority to 
H. R. 3304—286 

approve, disapprove, commute, or suspend a sentence in whole 

or in part pursuant to the terms of the pre-trial agreement, subject 

to the following limitations for convictions of offenses that involve 

a mandatory minimum sentence: 

‘‘(i) If a mandatory minimum sentence of a dishonorable 

discharge applies to an offense for which the accused has been 

convicted, the convening authority or another person authorized 

to act under this section may commute the dishonorable discharge to a bad conduct discharge pursuant to the terms of 

the pre-trial agreement. 

‘‘(ii) Except as provided in clause (i), if a mandatory minimum sentence applies to an offense for which the accused 

has been convicted, the convening authority or another person 

authorized to act under this section may not disapprove, otherwise commute, or suspend the mandatory minimum sentence 

in whole or in part, unless authorized to do so under subparagraph (B).’’. 

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

(1) REFERENCES TO SOLE DISCRETION AND OTHER PERSONS

AUTHORIZED TO ACT UNDER ARTICLE 60.—Section 860 of title 

10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice), is further amended— 

(A) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ‘‘or other person 

taking action under this section’’ and inserting ‘‘or another 

person authorized to act under this section’’; 

(B) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘or other person taking 

action under this section’’ the first place it appears and 

inserting ‘‘or another person authorized to act under this 

section’’; 

(C) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ‘‘or other person 

taking action under this section, in his sole discretion,’’ 

and inserting ‘‘or another person authorized to act under 

this section’’; and 

(D) in subsection (e)(3), by striking ‘‘or other person 

taking action under this section’’ and inserting ‘‘or another 

person authorized to act under this section’’. 

(2) OTHER AUTHORITY FOR CONVENING AUTHORITY TO SUS- PEND SENTENCE.—Section 871(d) of such title (article 71(d) of 

the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by adding 

at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘Paragraphs (2) and 

(4) of subsection (c) of section 860 of this title (article 60) 

shall apply to any decision by the convening authority or 

another person authorized to act under this section to suspend 

the execution of any sentence or part thereof under this subsection.’’. 

(3) REFERENCES TO ARTICLE 32 INVESTIGATION.—(A) Section 

802(d)(1)(A) of such title (article 2(d)(1)(A) of the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice) is amended by striking ‘‘investigation under 

section 832’’ and inserting ‘‘a preliminary hearing under section 

832’’. 

(B) Section 834(a)(2) of such title (article 34(a)(2) of the 

Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by striking 

‘‘investigation under section 832 of this title (article 32) (if 

there is such a report)’’ and inserting ‘‘a preliminary hearing 

under section 832 of this title (article 32)’’. 

(C) Section 838(b)(1) of such title (article 38(b)(1) of the 

Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by striking ‘‘an 
H. R. 3304—287 

investigation under section 832’’ and inserting ‘‘a preliminary 

hearing under section 832’’. 

(D) Section 847(a)(1) of such title (article 47(a)(1) of the 

Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by striking ‘‘an 

investigation pursuant to section 832(b) of this title (article 

32(b))’’ and inserting ‘‘a preliminary hearing pursuant to section 

832 of this title (article 32)’’. 

(E) Section 948b(d)(1)(C) of such title is amended by 

striking ‘‘pretrial investigation’’ and inserting ‘‘preliminary 

hearing’’. 

(d) EFFECTIVE DATES.— (1) ARTICLE 32 AMENDMENTS.—The amendments made by 

subsections (a) and (c)(3) shall take effect one year after the 

date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect 

to offenses committed under chapter 47 of title 10, United 

States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), on or after 

that effective date. 

(2) ARTICLE 60 AMENDMENTS.—The amendments made by 

subsection (b) and paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (c) 

shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment 

of this Act and shall apply with respect to offenses committed 

under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice), on or after that effective date. 

SEC. 1703. ELIMINATION OF FIVE-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON 

TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL FOR ADDITIONAL OFFENSES 

INVOLVING SEX-RELATED CRIMES. 

(a) INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL OFFENSES.—Section 843(a) of 

title 10, United States Code (article 43(a) of the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice), is amended by striking ‘‘rape, or rape of a 

child’’ and inserting ‘‘rape or sexual assault, or rape or sexual 

assault of a child’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 843(b)(2)(B)(i) of title 

10, United States Code (article 43(b)(2)(B)(i) of the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice), is amended by inserting before the period 

at the end the following: ‘‘, unless the offense is covered by subsection (a)’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and 

shall apply with respect to an offense covered by section 920(b) 

or 920b(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 120(b) or 120b(b) 

of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), that is committed on 

or after that date. 

SEC. 1704. DEFENSE COUNSEL INTERVIEW OF VICTIM OF AN ALLEGED 

SEX-RELATED OFFENSE IN PRESENCE OF TRIAL 

COUNSEL, COUNSEL FOR THE VICTIM, OR A SEXUAL 

ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATE. 

Section 846 of title 10, United States Code (article 46 of the 

Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(a) OPPORTUNITY TO OBTAIN WITNESSES

AND OTHER EVIDENCE.—’’before ‘‘The trial counsel’’; 

(2) by striking ‘‘Process issued’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(c) PROCESS.—Process issued’’; and 

(3) by inserting after subsection (a), as designated by paragraph (1), the following new subsection (b): 

‘‘(b) DEFENSE COUNSEL INTERVIEW OF VICTIM OF ALLEGED SEXRELATED OFFENSE.—(1) Upon notice by trial counsel to defense 
H. R. 3304—288 

counsel of the name of an alleged victim of an alleged sex-related 

offense who trial counsel intends to call to testify at a preliminary 

hearing under section 832 of this title (article 32) or a courtmartial under this chapter, defense counsel shall make any request 

to interview the victim through trial counsel. 

‘‘(2) If requested by an alleged victim of an alleged sex-related 

offense who is subject to a request for interview under paragraph 

(1), any interview of the victim by defense counsel shall take place 

only in the presence of trial counsel, a counsel for the victim, 

or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate. 

‘‘(3) In this subsection, the term ‘alleged sex-related offense’ 

means any allegation of— 

‘‘(A) a violation of section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, or 925 

of this title (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or 125); or 

‘‘(B) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a paragraph (1) as punishable under section 880 of this title (article 

80).’’. 

SEC. 1705. DISCHARGE OR DISMISSAL FOR CERTAIN SEX-RELATED 

OFFENSES AND TRIAL OF SUCH OFFENSES BY GENERAL 

COURTS-MARTIAL. 

(a) MANDATORY DISCHARGE OR DISMISSAL REQUIRED.— 

(1) IMPOSITION.—Section 856 of title 10, United States Code 

(article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is 

amended— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘The punishment’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(b)(1) While a person subject to this chapter who is found 

guilty of an offense specified in paragraph (2) shall be punished 

as a general court-martial may direct, such punishment must 

include, at a minimum, dismissal or dishonorable discharge, except 

as provided for in section 860 of this title (article 60). 

‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) applies to the following offenses: 

‘‘(A) An offense in violation of subsection (a) or (b) of 

section 920 of this title (article 120(a) or (b)). 

‘‘(B) Rape and sexual assault of a child under subsection 

(a) or (b) of section 920b of this title (article 120b). 

‘‘(C) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of this title (article 

125). 

‘‘(D) An attempt to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) that is punishable under section 880 

of this title (article 80).’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

(A) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section 

is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 856. Art. 56. Maximum and minimum limits’’. 

(B) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the 

beginning of subchapter VIII of chapter 47 of such title 

is amended by striking the item relating to section 856 

and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘856. Art 56. Maximum and minimum limits.’’. 

(b) JURISDICTION LIMITED TO GENERAL COURTS-MARTIAL.—Section 818 of title 10, United States Code (article 18 of the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice), is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before the first sentence; 
H. R. 3304—289 

(2) in the third sentence, by striking ‘‘However, a general 

court-martial’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(b) A general court-martial’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) Consistent with sections 819, 820, and 856(b) of this title 

(articles 19, 20, and 56(b)), only general courts-martial have jurisdiction over an offense specified in section 856(b)(2) of this title (article 

56(b)(2)).’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, and apply to offenses specified in section 856(b)(2) of title 

10, United States Code (article 56(b)(2) of the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice), as added by subsection (a)(1), committed on or 

after that date. 

SEC. 1706. PARTICIPATION BY VICTIM IN CLEMENCY PHASE OF 

COURTS-MARTIAL PROCESS. 

(a) VICTIM SUBMISSION OF MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION BY

CONVENING AUTHORITY.—Section 860 of title 10, United States 

Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as 

amended by section 1702, is further amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections 

(e) and (f), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d)(1) In any case in which findings and sentence have been 

adjudged for an offense that involved a victim, the victim shall 

be provided an opportunity to submit matters for consideration 

by the convening authority or by another person authorized to 

act under this section before the convening authority or such other 

person takes action under this section. 

‘‘(2)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the submission 

of matters under paragraph (1) shall be made within 10 days 

after the later of— 

‘‘(i) the date on which the victim has been given an authenticated record of trial in accordance with section 854(e) of 

this title (article 54(e)); and 

‘‘(ii) if applicable, the date on which the victim has been 

given the recommendation of the staff judge advocate or legal 

officer under subsection (e). 

‘‘(B) In the case of a summary court-martial, the submission 

of matters under paragraph (1) shall be made within seven days 

after the date on which the sentence is announced. 

‘‘(3) If a victim shows that additional time is required for 

submission of matters under paragraph (1), the convening authority 

or other person taking action under this section, for good cause, 

may extend the submission period under paragraph (2) for not 

more than an additional 20 days. 

‘‘(4) A victim may waive the right under this subsection to 

make a submission to the convening authority or other person 

taking action under this section. Such a waiver shall be made 

in writing and may not be revoked. For the purposes of subsection 

(c)(2), the time within which a victim may make a submission 

under this subsection shall be deemed to have expired upon the 

submission of such waiver to the convening authority or such other 

person. 
H. R. 3304—290 

‘‘(5) In this section, the term ‘victim’ means a person who 

has suffered a direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary loss as a 

result of a commission of an offense under this chapter (the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice) and on which the convening authority 

or other person authorized to take action under this section is 

taking action under this section.’’. 

(b) LIMITATIONS ON CONSIDERATION OF VICTIM’S CHARACTER.— 

Subsection (b) of section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 

60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding 

at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(5) The convening authority or other person taking action 

under this section shall not consider under this section any submitted matters that relate to the character of a victim unless 

such matters were presented as evidence at trial and not excluded 

at trial.’’. 

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (b)(1) of section 860 

of title 10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice), is amended by striking ‘‘subsection (d)’’ and 

inserting ‘‘subsection (e)’’. 

SEC. 1707. REPEAL OF THE OFFENSE OF CONSENSUAL SODOMY UNDER 

THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE. 

(a) RESTATEMENT OF ARTICLE 125 WITH CONSENSUAL SODOMY

OMITTED.—Section 925 of title 10, United States Code (article 125 

of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as 

follows: 

‘‘§ 925. Art 125. Forcible sodomy; bestiality 

‘‘(a) FORCIBLE SODOMY.—Any person subject to this chapter 

who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person 

of the same or opposite sex by force or without the consent of 

the other person is guilty of forcible sodomy and shall be punished 

as a court-martial may direct. 

‘‘(b) BESTIALITY.—Any person subject to this chapter who 

engages in unnatural carnal copulation with an animal is guilty 

of bestiality and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct. 

‘‘(c) SCOPE OF OFFENSES.—Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete an offense under subsection (a) or (b).’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code 

(the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking 

the item relating to section 925 (article 125) and inserting the 

following new item: 

‘‘925. Art 125. Forcible sodomy; bestiality.’’. 

SEC. 1708. MODIFICATION OF MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL TO 

ELIMINATE FACTOR RELATING TO CHARACTER AND MILITARY SERVICE OF THE ACCUSED IN RULE ON INITIAL 

DISPOSITION OF OFFENSES. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 

this Act, the discussion pertaining to Rule 306 of the Manual 

for Courts-Martial (relating to policy on initial disposition of 

offenses) shall be amended to strike the character and military 

service of the accused from the matters a commander should consider in deciding how to dispose of an offense. 
H. R. 3304—291 

SEC. 1709. PROHIBITION OF RETALIATION AGAINST MEMBERS OF THE 

ARMED FORCES FOR REPORTING A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. 

(a) REGULATIONS ON PROHIBITION OF RETALIATION.— 

(1) REGULATIONS REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense 

shall prescribe regulations, or require the Secretaries of the 

military departments to prescribe regulations, that prohibit 

retaliation against an alleged victim or other member of the 

Armed Forces who reports a criminal offense. The regulations 

shall prescribe that a violation of the regulations is an offense 

punishable under section 892 of title 10, United States Code 

(article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

(2) DEADLINE.—The regulations required by this subsection 

shall be prescribed not later than 120 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act. 

(b) RETALIATION AND PERSONNEL ACTION DESCRIBED.— 

(1) RETALIATION.—For purposes of the regulations required 

by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall define retaliation to include, at a minimum— 

(A) taking or threatening to take an adverse personnel 

action, or withholding or threatening to withhold a favorable personnel action, with respect to a member of the 

Armed Forces because the member reported a criminal 

offense; and 

(B) ostracism and such of acts of maltreatment, as 

designated by the Secretary of Defense, committed by peers 

of a member of the Armed Forces or by other persons 

because the member reported a criminal offense. 

(2) PERSONNEL ACTIONS.—For purposes of paragraph (1)(A), 

the Secretary of Defense shall define the personnel actions 

to be covered by the regulations. 

(c) REPORT ON SEPARATE PUNITIVE ARTICLE.—Not later than 

180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services 

of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting 

forth the recommendations of the Secretary regarding whether 

chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice), should be amended to add a new punitive 

article to subchapter X of such chapter to prohibit retaliation 

against an alleged victim or other member of the Armed Forces 

who reports a criminal offense. 

Subtitle B—Other Amendments to Title 10, 

United States Code 

SEC. 1711. PROHIBITION ON SERVICE IN THE ARMED FORCES BY 

INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF CERTAIN 

SEXUAL OFFENSES. 

(a) PROHIBITION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 37 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘§ 657. Prohibition on service in the armed forces by individuals convicted of certain sexual offenses 

‘‘(a) PROHIBITION ON COMMISSIONING OR ENLISTMENT.—A person who has been convicted of an offense specified in subsection 
H. R. 3304—292 

(b) under Federal or State law may not be processed for commissioning or permitted to enlist in the armed forces. 

‘‘(b) COVERED OFFENSES.—An offense specified in this subsection is any felony offense as follows: 

‘‘(1) Rape or sexual assault. 

‘‘(2) Forcible sodomy. 

‘‘(3) Incest. 

‘‘(4) An attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph 

(1) through (3), as punishable under applicable Federal or State 

law.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 

beginning of chapter 37 of such title is amended by adding 

at the end the following new item: 

‘‘657. Prohibition on service in the armed forces by individuals convicted of certain 

sexual offenses.’’. 

(b) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED PROHIBITION.—Section 523 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public 

Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1723; 10 U.S.C. 504 note) is repealed. 

SEC. 1712. ISSUANCE OF REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE COAST 

GUARD REGARDING CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR 

PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION OR UNIT TRANSFER 

BY VICTIM OF SEXUAL ASSAULT. 

Section 673(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘The Secretaries of the military departments’’ and 

inserting ‘‘The Secretary concerned’’. 

SEC. 1713. TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATIVE REASSIGNMENT OR 

REMOVAL OF A MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES ON 

ACTIVE DUTY WHO IS ACCUSED OF COMMITTING A 

SEXUAL ASSAULT OR RELATED OFFENSE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 39 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by inserting after section 673 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 674. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal 

of a member on active duty accused of committing 

a sexual assault or related offense 

‘‘(a) GUIDANCE FOR TIMELY CONSIDERATION AND ACTION.—The 

Secretary concerned may provide guidance, within guidelines provided by the Secretary of Defense, for commanders regarding their 

authority to make a timely determination, and to take action, 

regarding whether a member of the armed forces serving on active 

duty who is alleged to have committed an offense under section 

920, 920a, 920b, 920c, or 925 of this title (article 120, 120a, 120b, 

120c, or 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) or an attempt 

to commit such an offense as punishable under section 880 of 

this title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) should 

be temporarily reassigned or removed from a position of authority 

or from an assignment, not as a punitive measure, but solely 

for the purpose of maintaining good order and discipline within 

the member’s unit. 

‘‘(b) TIME FOR DETERMINATION.—A determination described in 

subsection (a) may be made at any time afer receipt of notification 

of an unrestricted report of a sexual assault or other sex-related 

offense that identifies the member as an alleged perpetrator.’’. 
H. R. 3304—293 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 39 of such title is amended by inserting after 

the item relating to section 673 the following new item: 

‘‘674. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member on active 

duty accused of committing a sexual assault or related offense.’’. 

(c) ADDITIONAL TRAINING REQUIREMENT FOR COMMANDERS.— The Secretary of Defense shall provide for the inclusion of information and discussion regarding the availability and use of the 

authority described by section 674 of title 10, United States Code, 

as added by subsection (a), as part of the training for new and 

prospective commanders at all levels of command required by section 585(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note). 

SEC. 1714. EXPANSION AND ENHANCEMENT OF AUTHORITIES 

RELATING TO PROTECTED COMMUNICATIONS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND PROHIBITED RETALIATORY ACTIONS. 

(a) EXPANSION OF PROHIBITED RETALIATORY PERSONNEL

ACTIONS.—Subsection (b) of section 1034 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘preparing—’’ and inserting ‘‘preparing 

or being perceived as making or preparing—’’; 

(B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

(C) in subparagraph (B)— 

(i) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

(ii) by redesignating clause (v) as clause (vi) and, 

in such clause, by striking the period at the end and 

inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

(iii) by inserting after clause (iv) the following 

new clause (v): 

‘‘(v) a court-martial proceeding; or’’; and 

(D) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(C) testimony, or otherwise participating in or assisting 

in an investigation or proceeding related to a communication 

under subparagraph (A) or (B), or filing, causing to be filed, 

participating in, or otherwise assisting in an action brought 

under this section.’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘unfavorable action’’ and 

inserting a comma; and 

(B) by inserting after ‘‘any favorable action’’ the following: ‘‘, or making or threatening to make a significant 

change in the duties or responsibilities of a member of 

the armed forces not commensurate with the member’s 

grade’’. 

(b) INSPECTOR GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS OF ALLEGATIONS.— Subsection (c) of section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘paragraph (3)’’ and 

inserting ‘‘paragraph (4)’’; 

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as paragraphs (4), (5), and (6), respectively; 

(3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3): 
H. R. 3304—294 

‘‘(3) A communication described in paragraph (2) shall not 

be excluded from the protections provided in this section because— 

‘‘(A) the communication was made to a person who participated in an activity that the member reasonably believed to 

be covered by paragraph (2); 

‘‘(B) the communication revealed information that had previously been disclosed; 

‘‘(C) of the member’s motive for making the communication; 

‘‘(D) the communication was not made in writing; 

‘‘(E) the communication was made while the member was 

off duty; and 

‘‘(F) the communication was made during the normal course 

of duties of the member.’’; 

(4) in paragraph (5), as redesignated by paragraph (2) 

of this subsection— 

(A) by striking ‘‘paragraph (3)(A)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (4)(A)’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘paragraph (3)(D)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (4)(D)’’; and 

(C) by striking ‘‘60 days’’ and inserting ‘‘one year’’; 

and 

(5) in paragraph (6), as redesignated by paragraph (2) 

of this subsection, by striking ‘‘outside the immediate chain 

of command of both the member submitting the allegation 

and the individual or individuals alleged to have taken the 

retaliatory action.’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘one or both 

of the following: 

‘‘(A) Outside the immediate chain of command of both 

the member submitting the allegation and the individual or 

individuals alleged to have taken the retaliatory action. 

‘‘(B) At least one organization higher in the chain of command than the organization of the member submitting the 

allegation and the individual or individuals alleged to have 

taken the retaliatory action.’’. 

(c) INSPECTOR GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS OF UNDERLYING

ALLEGATIONS.—Subsection (d) of section 1034 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘subparagraph (A) or (B) of 

subsection (c)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of 

subsection (c)(2)’’. 

(d) REPORTS ON INVESTIGATIONS.—Subsection (e) of section 1034 

of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘subsection (c)(3)(E)’’ both places it 

appears and inserting ‘‘subsection (c)(4)(E)’’; 

(B) by inserting ‘‘and the Secretary of the military 

department concerned’’ after ‘‘the Secretary of Defense’’; 

and 

(C) by striking ‘‘transmitted to the Secretary’’ and 

inserting ‘‘transmitted to such Secretaries’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘and the Secretary of 

the military department concerned’’ after ‘‘the Secretary of 

Defense’’. 

(e) ACTION IN CASE OF VIOLATIONS.—Section 1034 of title 10, 

United States Code, is further amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (f), (g), (h), and (i) as 

subsections (g), (h), (i), and (j), respectively; and 
H. R. 3304—295 

(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): 

‘‘(f) ACTION IN CASE OF VIOLATIONS.—(1) Not later than 30 

days after receiving a report from the Inspector General under 

subsection (e), the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Secretary 

of the military department concerned, as applicable, shall determine 

whether there is sufficient basis to conclude whether a personnel 

action prohibited by subsection (b) has occurred. 

‘‘(2) If the Secretary concerned determines under paragraph 

(1) that a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b) has occurred, 

the Secretary shall— 

‘‘(A) order such action as is necessary to correct the record 

of a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b); and 

‘‘(B) take any appropriate disciplinary action against the 

individual who committed such prohibited personnel action. 

‘‘(3) If the Secretary concerned determines under paragraph 

(1) that an order for corrective or disciplinary action is not appropriate, not later than 30 days after making the determination, 

such Secretary shall— 

‘‘(A) provide to the Secretary of Defense and the member 

or former member a notice of the determination and the reasons 

for not taking action; and 

‘‘(B) when appropriate, refer the report to the appropriate 

board for the correction of military records for further review 

under subsection (g).’’. 

(f) CORRECTION OF RECORDS.—Subsection (g) of section 1034 

of title 10, United States Code, as redesignated by subsection (e)(1) 

of this section, is amended in paragraph (3)— 

(1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 

‘‘board elects to hold’’ and inserting ‘‘board holds’’; and 

(2) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by striking ‘‘the case is 

unusually complex or otherwise requires’’ and inserting ‘‘the 

member or former member would benefit from’’. 

SEC. 1715. INSPECTOR GENERAL INVESTIGATION OF ALLEGATIONS 

OF RETALIATORY PERSONNEL ACTIONS TAKEN IN 

RESPONSE TO MAKING PROTECTED COMMUNICATIONS 

REGARDING SEXUAL ASSAULT. 

Section 1034(c)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘sexual harassment or’’ and inserting ‘‘rape, sexual 

assault, or other sexual misconduct in violation of sections 920 

through 920c of this title (articles 120 through 120c of the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice), sexual harassment, or’’. 

SEC. 1716. DESIGNATION AND AVAILABILITY OF SPECIAL VICTIMS’ 

COUNSEL FOR VICTIMS OF SEX-RELATED OFFENSES. 

(a) DESIGNATION AND DUTIES.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 53 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended by inserting after section 1044d the following 

new section: 

‘‘§ 1044e. Special Victims’ Counsel for victims of sex-related 

offenses 

‘‘(a) DESIGNATION; PURPOSES.—The Secretary concerned shall 

designate legal counsel (to be known as ‘Special Victims’ Counsel’) 

for the purpose of providing legal assistance to an individual eligible 

for military legal assistance under section 1044 of this title who 
H. R. 3304—296 

is the victim of an alleged sex-related offense, regardless of whether 

the report of that offense is restricted or unrestricted. 

‘‘(b) TYPES OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE AUTHORIZED.—The types of 

legal assistance authorized by subsection (a) include the following: 

‘‘(1) Legal consultation regarding potential criminal liability 

of the victim stemming from or in relation to the circumstances 

surrounding the alleged sex-related offense and the victim’s 

right to seek military defense services. 

‘‘(2) Legal consultation regarding the Victim Witness Assistance Program, including— 

‘‘(A) the rights and benefits afforded the victim; 

‘‘(B) the role of the Victim Witness Assistance Program 

liaison and what privileges do or do not exist between 

the victim and the liaison; and 

‘‘(C) the nature of communication made to the liaison 

in comparison to communication made to a Special Victims’ 

Counsel or a legal assistance attorney under section 1044 

of this title. 

‘‘(3) Legal consultation regarding the responsibilities and 

support provided to the victim by the Sexual Assault Response 

Coordinator, a unit or installation Sexual Assault Victim Advocate, or domestic abuse advocate, to include any privileges 

that may exist regarding communications between those persons and the victim. 

‘‘(4) Legal consultation regarding the potential for civil 

litigation against other parties (other than the Department 

of Defense). 

‘‘(5) Legal consultation regarding the military justice 

system, including (but not limited to)— 

‘‘(A) the roles and responsibilities of the trial counsel, 

the defense counsel, and investigators; 

‘‘(B) any proceedings of the military justice process 

in which the victim may observe; 

‘‘(C) the Government’s authority to compel cooperation 

and testimony; and 

‘‘(D) the victim’s responsibility to testify, and other 

duties to the court. 

‘‘(6) Accompanying the victim at any proceedings in connection with the reporting, military investigation, and military 

prosecution of the alleged sex-related offense. 

‘‘(7) Legal consultation regarding eligibility and requirements for services available from appropriate agencies or offices 

for emotional and mental health counseling and other medical 

services; 

‘‘(8) Legal consultation and assistance— 

‘‘(A) in personal civil legal matters in accordance with 

section 1044 of this title; 

‘‘(B) in any proceedings of the military justice process 

in which a victim can participate as a witness or other 

party; 

‘‘(C) in understanding the availability of, and obtaining 

any protections offered by, civilian and military protecting 

or restraining orders; and 

‘‘(D) in understanding the eligibility and requirements 

for, and obtaining, any available military and veteran benefits, such as transitional compensation benefits found in 
H. R. 3304—297 

section 1059 of this title and other State and Federal 

victims’ compensation programs. 

‘‘(9) Such other legal assistance as the Secretary of Defense 

(or, in the case of the Coast Guard, the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating) may authorize 

in the regulations prescribed under subsection (h). 

‘‘(c) NATURE OF RELATIONSHIP.—The relationship between a 

Special Victims’ Counsel and a victim in the provision of legal 

advice and assistance shall be the relationship between an attorney 

and client. 

‘‘(d) QUALIFICATIONS.—An individual may not be designated 

as a Special Victims’ Counsel under this section unless the individual— 

‘‘(1) meets the qualifications specified in section 1044(d)(2) 

of this title; and 

‘‘(2) is certified as competent to be designated as a Special 

Victims’ Counsel by the Judge Advocate General of the armed 

force in which the judge advocate is a member or by which 

the civilian attorney is employed. 

‘‘(e) ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY.—(1) Consistent with the 

regulations prescribed under subsection (h), the Judge Advocate 

General (as defined in section 801(1) of this title) under the jurisdiction of the Secretary, and within the Marine Corps the Staff Judge 

Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps, is responsible 

for the establishment and supervision of individuals designated 

as Special Victims’ Counsel. 

‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense (and, in the case of the Coast 

Guard, the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard 

is operating) shall conduct a periodic evaluation of the Special 

Victims’ Counsel programs operated under this section. 

‘‘(f) AVAILABILITY OF SPECIAL VICTIMS’ COUNSEL.—(1) An individual eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044 of 

this title who is the victim of an alleged sex-related offense shall 

be offered the option of receiving assistance from a Special Victims’ 

Counsel upon report of an alleged sex-related offense or at the 

time the victim seeks assistance from a Sexual Assault Response 

Coordinator, a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate, a military criminal 

investigator, a victim/witness liaison, a trial counsel, a healthcare 

provider, or any other personnel designated by the Secretary concerned for purposes of this subsection. 

‘‘(2) The assistance of a Special Victims’ Counsel under this 

subsection shall be available to an individual eligible for military 

legal assistance under section 1044 of this title regardless of 

whether the individual elects unrestricted or restricted reporting 

of the alleged sex-related offense. The individual shall also be 

informed that the assistance of a Special Victims’ Counsel may 

be declined, in whole or in part, but that declining such assistance 

does not preclude the individual from subsequently requesting the 

assistance of a Special Victims’ Counsel. 

‘‘(g) ALLEGED SEX-RELATED OFFENSE DEFINED.—In this section, 

the term ‘alleged sex-related offense’ means any allegation of— 

‘‘(1) a violation of section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, or 925 

of this title (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or 125 of the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice); or 

‘‘(2) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a paragraph (1) as punishable under section 880 of this title (article 

80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 
H. R. 3304—298 

‘‘(h) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 

of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall 

prescribe regulations to carry out this section.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 

beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 

item relating to section 1044d the following new item: 

‘‘1044e. Special Victims’ Counsel for victims of sex-related offenses.’’. 

(3) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

(A) QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONS PROVIDING LEGAL

ASSISTANCE.—Section 1044(d)(2) of such title is amended 

by inserting before the period at the end the following: 

‘‘and, for purposes of service as a Special Victims’ Counsel 

under section 1044e of this title, meets the additional qualifications specified in subsection (d)(2) of such section.’’. 

(B) INCLUSION IN DEFINITION OF MILITARY LEGAL

ASSISTANCE.—Section 1044(d)(3)(B) of such title is amended 

by striking ‘‘and 1044d’’ and inserting ‘‘1044d, 1044e, and 

1565b(a)(1)(A)’’. 

(C) ACCESS TO LEGAL ASSISTANCE AND SERVICES.—Section 1565b(a)(1)(A) of such title is amended by striking 

‘‘section 1044’’ and inserting ‘‘sections 1044 and 1044e’’. 

(4) IMPLEMENTATION.—Section 1044e of title 10, United 

States Code, as added by paragraph (1), shall be implemented 

within 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(b) ENHANCED TRAINING REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of each 

military department, and the Secretary of Homeland Security with 

respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service 

in the Department of the Navy, shall implement, consistent with 

the guidelines provided under section 1044e of title 10, United 

States Code, as added by subsection (a), in-depth and advanced 

training for all military and civilian attorneys providing legal assistance under section 1044 or 1044e of such title to support victims 

of alleged sex-related offenses. 

(c) SECRETARY OF DEFENSE IMPLEMENTATION REPORT.— 

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, 

in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security with 

respect to the Coast Guard, shall submit to the Committees 

on Armed Services and Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

of the Senate and the Committees on Armed Services and 

Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report describing how the Armed Forces will implement 

the requirements of section 1044e of title 10, United States 

Code, as added by subsection (a). 

(2) ADDITIONAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT.—The report 

required by paragraph (1) shall also be submitted to the independent review panel established by the Secretary of Defense 

under section 576(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) 

and to the Joint Services Committee on Military Justice. 
H. R. 3304—299 

Subtitle C—Amendments to Other Laws 

SEC. 1721. TRACKING OF COMPLIANCE OF COMMANDING OFFICERS 

IN CONDUCTING ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE ASSESSMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF PREVENTING AND 

RESPONDING TO SEXUAL ASSAULTS. 

Section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1753; 10 U.S.C. 1561 

note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d) TRACKING OF ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE ASSESSMENT

COMPLIANCE.—The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Secretaries 

of the military departments to verify and track the compliance 

of commanding officers in conducting organizational climate assessments, as required by subsection (a)(3).’’. 

SEC. 1722. ADVANCEMENT OF SUBMITTAL DEADLINE FOR REPORT OF 

INDEPENDENT PANEL ON ASSESSMENT OF MILITARY 

RESPONSE SYSTEMS TO SEXUAL ASSAULT. 

Section 576(c)(1)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1759) is 

amended by striking ‘‘Eighteen months’’ and inserting ‘‘Twelve 

months’’. 

SEC. 1723. RETENTION OF CERTAIN FORMS IN CONNECTION WITH 

RESTRICTED REPORTS AND UNRESTRICTED REPORTS ON 

SEXUAL ASSAULT INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

FORCES. 

(a) REQUIREMENT FOR RETENTION.—Subsection (a) of section 

577 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1762; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) 

is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘At the request of a member of the Armed 

Forces who files a Restricted Report on an incident of sexual 

assault involving the member, the Secretary of Defense shall’’ 

and inserting ‘‘The Secretary of Defense shall’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘the Restricted Report’’ and inserting ‘‘a 

Restricted Report or Unrestricted Report on an incident of 

sexual assault involving a member of the Armed Forces’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading of such section 

is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘SEC. 577. RETENTION OF CERTAIN FORMS IN CONNECTION WITH 

RESTRICTED REPORTS AND UNRESTRICTED REPORTS ON 

SEXUAL ASSAULT INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

FORCES.’’. 

SEC. 1724. TIMELY ACCESS TO SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE COORDINATORS BY MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD AND 

RESERVES. 

Section 584(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1433; 10 U.S.C. 

1561 note) is amended— 

(1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and 

(2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): 

‘‘(2) AVAILABILITY FOR RESERVE COMPONENT MEMBERS.— 

The Secretary of the military department concerned shall 
H. R. 3304—300 

ensure the timely access to a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator by any member of the National Guard or Reserve who— 

‘‘(A) is the victim of a sexual assault during the 

performance of duties as a member of the National Guard 

or Reserves; or 

‘‘(B) is the victim of a sexual assault committed by 

a member of the National Guard or Reserves.’’. 

SEC. 1725. QUALIFICATIONS AND SELECTION OF DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE 

PERSONNEL AND REQUIRED AVAILABILITY OF SEXUAL 

ASSAULT NURSE EXAMINERS. 

(a) QUALIFICATIONS FOR ASSIGNMENT.—Section 1602(e)(2) of the 

Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 124 Stat. 4431) 

is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph 

(C); and 

(2) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following 

new subparagraphs: 

‘‘(A) the qualifications necessary for a member of the 

Armed Forces or a civilian employee of the Department 

of Defense to be selected for assignment to duty as a 

Sexual Assault Response and Prevention Program Manager, Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, or Sexual 

Assault Victim Advocate, whether assigned to such duty 

on a full-time or part-time basis; 

‘‘(B) consistent with section 584(c) of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public 

Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 125 Stat. 1433), the 

training, certification, and status of members of the Armed 

Forces and civilian employees of the department assigned 

to duty as Sexual Assault Response and Prevention Program Managers, Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, 

and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates for the Armed Forces; 

and’’. 

(b) AVAILABILITY OF SEXUAL ASSAULT NURSE EXAMINERS AT

MILITARY MEDICAL TREATMENT FACILITIES.— 

(1) FACILITIES WITH FULL-TIME EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT.— 

The Secretary of a military department shall require the assignment of at least one full-time sexual assault nurse examiner 

to each military medical treatment facility under the jurisdiction of that Secretary in which an emergency department operates 24 hours per day. The Secretary may assign additional 

sexual assault nurse examiners based on the demographics 

of the patients who utilize the military medical treatment 

facility. 

(2) OTHER FACILITIES.—In the case of a military medical 

treatment facility not covered by paragraph (1), the Secretary 

of the military department concerned shall require that a sexual 

assault nurse examiner be made available to a patient of the 

facility, consistent with the Department of Justice National 

Protocol for Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examinations, 

Adult/Adolescent, when a determination is made regarding the 

patient’s need for the services of a sexual assault nurse examiner. 
H. R. 3304—301 

(3) QUALIFICATIONS.—A sexual assault nurse examiner 

assigned under paragraph (1) or made available under paragraph (2) shall meet such training and certification requirements as are prescribed by the Secretary of Defense. 

(c) REPORT ON TRAINING, QUALIFICATIONS, AND EXPERIENCE

OF SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PERSONNEL.— 

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—The Secretary shall prepare a 

report on the review, conducted pursuant to the Secretary 

of Defense Memorandum of May 17, 2013, of the adequacy 

of the training, qualifications, and experience of each member 

of the Armed Forces and civilian employee of the Department 

of Defense who is assigned to a position that includes responsibility for sexual assault prevention and response within the 

Armed Forces for the successful discharge of such responsibility. 

(2) REPORT ELEMENTS.—The report shall include the following: 

(A) An assessment of the adequacy of the training 

and certifications required for members and employees 

described in paragraph (1). 

(B) The number of such members and employees who 

did not have the training, qualifications, or experience 

required to successfully discharge their responsibility for 

sexual assault prevention and response within the Armed 

Forces. 

(C) The actions taken by the Secretary of Defense 

with respect to such members and employees who were 

found to lack the training, qualifications, or experience 

to successfully discharge such responsibility. 

(D) Such improvements as the Secretary considers 

appropriate in the process used to select and assign members and employees to positions that include responsibility 

for sexual assault prevention and response within the 

Armed Forces in order to ensure the highest caliber candidates are selected and assigned to such positions. 

(3) SUBMISSION.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit the report to the Committees on Armed Services of 

the Senate and the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 1726. ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF SEXUAL ASSAULT 

PREVENTION AND RESPONSE OFFICE FOR DEPARTMENT 

OF DEFENSE SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND 

RESPONSE PROGRAM. 

(a) ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR DUTIES.—Subsection (b) of section 

1611 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is 

amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (2); 

(2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (3) 

and inserting a semicolon; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(4) collect and maintain data of the military departments 

on sexual assault in accordance with subsection (e); 

‘‘(5) act as liaison between the Department of Defense 

and other Federal and State agencies on programs and efforts 

relating to sexual assault prevention and response; and 
H. R. 3304—302 

‘‘(6) oversee development of strategic program guidance 

and joint planning objectives for resources in support of the 

sexual assault prevention and response program, and make 

recommendations on modifications to policy, law, and regulations needed to ensure the continuing availability of such 

resources.’’. 

(b) COLLECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF DATA.—Such section 

is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) DATA COLLECTION AND MAINTENANCE METRICS.—In carrying out the requirements of subsection (b)(4), the Director of 

the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office shall develop 

metrics to measure the effectiveness of, and compliance with, 

training and awareness objectives of the military departments on 

sexual assault prevention and response.’’. 

Subtitle D—Studies, Reviews, Policies, and 

Reports 

SEC. 1731. INDEPENDENT REVIEWS AND ASSESSMENTS OF UNIFORM 

CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES. 

(a) ADDITIONAL DUTIES FOR RESPONSE SYSTEMS PANEL.— (1) ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIFIED.—The independent 

panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection 

(a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758), 

known as the ‘‘response systems panel’’, shall conduct the following: 

(A) An assessment of the impact, if any, that removing 

from the chain of command any disposition authority 

regarding charges preferred under chapter 47 of title 10, 

United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), 

would have on overall reporting and prosecution of sexual 

assault cases. 

(B) An assessment regarding whether the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of Special Victims’ Counsel to 

provide legal assistance under section 1044e of title 10, 

United States Code, as added by section 1716, to victims 

of alleged sex-related offenses should be expanded to 

include legal standing to represent the victim during investigative and military justice proceedings in connection with 

the prosecution of the offense. 

(C) An assessment of the feasibility and appropriateness of extending to victims of crimes covered by chapter 

47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice), the right afforded a crime victim in 

civilian criminal legal proceedings under subsection (a)(4) 

of section 3771 of title 18, United States Code, and the 

legal standing to seek enforcement of crime victim rights 

provided by subsection (d) of such section. 

(D) An assessment of the means by which the name, 

if known, and other necessary identifying information of 

an alleged offender that is collected as part of a restricted 

report of a sexual assault could be compiled into a protected, searchable database accessible only to military 
H. R. 3304—303 

criminal investigators, Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, or other appropriate personnel only for the purposes 

of identifying individuals who are subjects of multiple 

accusations of sexual assault and encouraging victims to 

make an unrestricted report of sexual assault in those 

cases in order to facilitate increased prosecutions, particularly of serial offenders. The assessment should include 

an evaluation of the appropriate content to be included 

in the database, as well as the best means to maintain 

the privacy of those making a restricted report. 

(E) As part of the comparison of military and civilian 

systems for the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication 

of adult sexual assault crimes, as required by subsection 

(d)(1)(B) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, an assessment of the 

opportunities for clemency provided in the military and 

civilian systems, the appropriateness of clemency proceedings in the military system, the manner in which clemency is used in the military system, and whether clemency 

in the military justice system could be reserved until the 

end of the military appeals process. 

(F) An assessment of whether the Department of 

Defense should promulgate, and ensure the understanding 

of and compliance with, a formal statement of what 

accountability, rights, and responsibilities a member of the 

Armed Forces has with regard to matters of sexual assault 

prevention and response, as a means of addressing those 

issues within the Armed Forces. If the response systems 

panel recommends such a formal statement, the response 

systems panel shall provide key elements or principles 

that should be included in the formal statement. 

(2) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—The response systems panel 

shall include the results of the assessments required by paragraph (1) in the report required by subsection (c)(1) of section 

576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2013, as amended by section 1722. 

(b) ADDITIONAL DUTIES FOR JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS PANEL.— (1) ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIFIED.—The independent 

panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection 

(a)(2) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758), 

known as the ‘‘judicial proceedings panel’’, shall conduct the 

following: 

(A) An assessment of the likely consequences of 

amending the definition of rape and sexual assault under 

section 920 of title 10, United States Code (article 120 

of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), to expressly cover 

a situation in which a person subject to chapter 47 of 

title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice), commits a sexual act upon another person by 

abusing one’s position in the chain of command of the 

other person to gain access to or coerce the other person. 

(B) An assessment of the implementation and effect 

of section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added 

by section 1716, and make such recommendations for modification of such section 1044e as the judicial proceedings 

panel considers appropriate. 
H. R. 3304—304 

(C) An assessment of the implementation and effect 

of the mandatory minimum sentences established by section 856(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b) 

of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by 

section 1705, and the appropriateness of statutorily mandated minimum sentencing provisions for additional 

offenses under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code 

(the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

(D) An assessment of the adequacy of the provision 

of compensation and restitution for victims of offenses 

under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), and develop recommendations on expanding such compensation and restitution, 

including consideration of the options as follows: 

(i) Providing the forfeited wages of incarcerated 

members of the Armed Forces to victims of offenses 

as compensation. 

(ii) Including bodily harm among the injuries meriting compensation for redress under section 939 of 

title 10, United States Code (article 139 of the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice). 

(iii) Requiring restitution by members of the 

Armed Forces to victims of their offenses upon the 

direction of a court-martial. 

(2) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—The judicial proceedings 

panel shall include the results of the assessments required 

by paragraph (1) in one of the reports required by subsection 

(c)(2)(B) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013. 

SEC. 1732. REVIEW AND POLICY REGARDING DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE INVESTIGATIVE PRACTICES IN RESPONSE TO 

ALLEGATIONS OF UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE 

VIOLATIONS. 

(a) REVIEW.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a 

review of the practices of the military criminal investigative 

organizations (Army Criminal Investigation Command, Naval 

Criminal Investigative Service, and Air Force Office of Special 

Investigation) in response to an allegation that a member of the 

Armed Forces has committed an offense under the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice, including the extent to which the military 

criminal investigative organizations make a recommendation 

regarding whether an allegation appears founded or unfounded. 

(b) POLICY.—After conducting the review required by subsection 

(a), the Secretary of Defense shall develop a uniform policy for 

the Armed Forces, to the extent practicable, regarding the use 

of case determinations to record the results of the investigation 

of an alleged violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

In developing the policy, the Secretary shall consider the feasibility 

of adopting case determination methods, such as the uniform crime 

report, used by nonmilitary law enforcement agencies. 

SEC. 1733. REVIEW OF TRAINING AND EDUCATION PROVIDED MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES ON SEXUAL ASSAULT 

PREVENTION AND RESPONSE. 

(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry 

out a review of the adequacy of the training and education provided 
H. R. 3304—305 

members of the Armed Forces on sexual assault prevention and 

response. 

(b) RESPONSIVE ACTION.—Upon completion of the review, the 

Secretary of Defense shall— 

(1) identify common core elements that must be included 

in any training or education provided members of the Armed 

Forces on sexual assault prevention and response; and 

(2) recommend such other modifications of such training 

and education as the Secretary considers appropriate to address 

any inadequacies identified during the review. 

(c) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 

of Representatives a report containing the results of the review, 

including the common core elements identified in the review that 

will be included in any training or education provided members 

of the Armed Forces on sexual assault prevention and response. 

SEC. 1734. REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE POLICY ON THE RETENTION OF AND ACCESS 

TO EVIDENCE AND RECORDS RELATING TO SEXUAL 

ASSAULTS INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) REVIEW OF EVIDENCE AND RECORDS RETENTION AND ACCESS

POLICY.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the 

progress made in developing and implementing the comprehensive 

policy on the retention of and access to evidence and records relating 

to sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces, which 

was required by section 586 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1434; 

10 U.S.C. 1561 note). 

(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 

of Representatives a report containing the results of the review. 

In the report, the Secretary shall explain how the Secretary has 

addressed each of the matters listed in paragraphs (1) through 

(11) of subsection (c) of section 586 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 that, at a minimum, were 

required to be considered in the development of the policy. 

SEC. 1735. REVIEW OF THE OFFICE OF DIVERSITY MANAGEMENT AND 

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ROLE IN SEXUAL HARASSMENT 

CASES. 

(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct 

a review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity for the purposes specified in subsection (b). 

(b) ELEMENTS OF STUDY.—In conducting the review under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall— 

(1) determine whether sexual harassment cases should be 

evaluated or addressed within the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity; 

(2) identify and evaluate how the Office of Diversity 

Management and Equal Opportunity works with the Sexual 

Assault Prevention and Response Office to address sexual 

harassment in the Armed Forces and the current role of the 

Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity in 

sexual harassment cases; 
H. R. 3304—306 

(3) identify and evaluate the resource and personnel gaps, 

if any, in the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity to adequately address sexual harassment cases; and 

(4) identify and assess the capability of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity to track incidences 

of sexual harassment cases. 

(c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘sexual harassment’’ 

has the meaning given such term in Department of Defense Directive 1350.2, Department of Defense Military Equal Opportunity 

Program. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

SEC. 1741. ENHANCED PROTECTIONS FOR PROSPECTIVE MEMBERS 

AND NEW MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES DURING 

ENTRY-LEVEL PROCESSING AND TRAINING. 

(a) DEFINING INAPPROPRIATE AND PROHIBITED RELATIONSHIPS, 

COMMUNICATION, CONDUCT, AND CONTACT BETWEEN CERTAIN MEM- BERS.— (1) POLICY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of a military department and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast 

Guard is operating shall maintain a policy that defines and 

prescribes, for the persons described in paragraph (2), what 

constitutes an inappropriate and prohibited relationship, 

communication, conduct, or contact, including when such an 

action is consensual, between a member of the Armed Forces 

described in paragraph (2)(A) and a prospective member or 

member of the Armed Forces described in paragraph (2)(B). 

(2) COVERED MEMBERS.—The policy required by paragraph 

(1) shall apply to— 

(A) a member of the Armed Forces who exercises 

authority or control over, or supervises, a person described 

in subparagraph (B) during the entry-level processing or 

training of the person; and 

(B) a prospective member of the Armed Forces or a 

member of the Armed Forces undergoing entry-level processing or training. 

(3) INCLUSION OF CERTAIN MEMBERS REQUIRED.—The members of the Armed Forces covered by paragraph (2)(A) shall 

include, at a minimum, military personnel assigned or attached 

to duty— 

(A) for the purpose of recruiting or assessing persons 

for enlistment or appointment as a commissioned officer, 

warrant officer, or enlisted member of the Armed Forces; 

(B) at a Military Entrance Processing Station; or 

(C) at an entry-level training facility or school of an 

Armed Force. 

(b) EFFECT OF VIOLATIONS.—A member of the Armed Forces 

who violates the policy required by subsection (a) shall be subject 

to prosecution under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

(c) PROCESSING FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION.— (1) IN GENERAL.—(A) The Secretary of Defense and the 

Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is 

operating shall require the processing for administrative separation of any member of the Armed Forces described in subsection (a)(2)(A) in response to the first substantiated violation 
H. R. 3304—307 

by the member of the policy required by subsection (a), when 

the member is not otherwise punitively discharged or dismissed 

from the Armed Forces for that violation. 

(B) The Secretary of a military department shall revise 

regulations applicable to the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of that Secretary as necessary to ensure compliance with 

the requirement under subparagraph (A). 

(2) REQUIRED ELEMENTS.—(A) In imposing the requirement 

under paragraph (1), the Secretaries shall ensure that any 

separation decision regarding a member of the Armed Forces 

is based on the full facts of the case and that due process 

procedures are provided under existing law or regulations or 

additionally prescribed, as considered necessary by the Secretaries, pursuant to subsection (f). 

(B) The requirement imposed by paragraph (1) shall not 

be interpreted to limit or alter the authority of the Secretary 

of a military department and the Secretary of the Department 

in which the Coast Guard is operating to process members 

of the Armed Forces for administrative separation— 

(i) for reasons other than a substantiated violation 

of the policy required by subsection (a); or 

(ii) under other provisions of law or regulation. 

(3) SUBSTANTIATED VIOLATION.—For purposes of paragraph 

(1), a violation by a member of the Armed Forces described 

in subsection (a)(2)(A) of the policy required by subsection (a) 

shall be treated as substantiated if— 

(A) there has been a court-martial conviction for violation of the policy, but the adjudged sentence does not 

include discharge or dismissal; or 

(B) a nonjudicial punishment authority under section 

815 of title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), has determined that a 

member has committed an offense in violation of the policy 

and imposed nonjudicial punishment upon the member. 

(d) REPORT ON NEED FOR UCMJ PUNITIVE ARTICLE.—Not later 

than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report 

containing the recommendations of the Secretary regarding the 

need to amend chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the 

Uniform Code of Military Justice), to create an additional article 

under subchapter X of such chapter to address violations of the 

policy required by subsection (a). 

(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘entry-level processing or training’’, with 

respect to a member of the Armed Forces, means the period 

beginning on the date on which the member became a member 

of the Armed Forces and ending on the date on which the 

member physically arrives at that member’s first duty assignment following completion of initial entry training (or its 

equivalent), as defined by the Secretary of the military department concerned or the Secretary of the Department in which 

the Coast Guard is operating. 

(2) The term ‘‘prospective member of the Armed Forces’’ 

means a person who has had a face-to-face meeting with a 

member of the Armed Forces assigned or attached to duty 

described in subsection (a)(3)(A) regarding becoming a member 
H. R. 3304—308 

of the Armed Forces, regardless of whether the person eventually becomes a member of the Armed Forces. 

(f) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating 

shall issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out 

this section. The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, to the 

extent practicable, the regulations are uniform for each armed 

force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary. 

SEC. 1742. COMMANDING OFFICER ACTION ON REPORTS ON SEXUAL 

OFFENSES INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED.—A commanding officer who 

receives a report of a sex-related offense involving a member of 

the Armed Forces in the chain of command of such officer shall 

act upon the report in accordance with subsection (b) immediately 

after receipt of the report by the commanding officer. 

(b) ACTION REQUIRED.—The action required by this subsection 

with respect to a report described in subsection (a) is the referral 

of the report to the military criminal investigation organization 

with responsibility for investigating that offense of the military 

department concerned or such other investigation service of the 

military department concerned as the Secretary of the military 

department concerned may specify for purposes of this section. 

SEC. 1743. EIGHT-DAY INCIDENT REPORTING REQUIREMENT IN 

RESPONSE TO UNRESTRICTED REPORT OF SEXUAL 

ASSAULT IN WHICH THE VICTIM IS A MEMBER OF THE 

ARMED FORCES. 

(a) INCIDENT REPORTING POLICY REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary 

of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the 

Coast Guard is operating shall establish and maintain a policy 

to require the submission by a designated person of a written 

incident report not later than eight days after an unrestricted 

report of sexual assault has been made in which a member of 

the Armed Forces is the victim. At a minimum, this incident report 

shall be provided to the following: 

(1) The installation commander, if such incident occurred 

on or in the vicinity of a military installation. 

(2) The first officer in the grade of 0–6, and the first 

general officer or flag officer, in the chain of command of 

the victim. 

(3) The first officer in the grade of 0–6, and the first 

general officer or flag officer, in the chain of command of 

the alleged offender if the alleged offender is a member of 

the Armed Forces. 

(b) PURPOSE OF REPORT.—The purpose of the required incident 

report under subsection (a) is to detail the actions taken or in 

progress to provide the necessary care and support to the victim 

of the assault, to refer the allegation of sexual assault to the 

appropriate investigatory agency, and to provide initial notification 

of the serious incident when that notification has not already taken 

place. 

(c) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The report of an incident under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following: 

(A) Time/Date/Location of the alleged incident. 

(B) Type of offense alleged. 
H. R. 3304—309 

(C) Service affiliation, assigned unit, and location of 

the victim. 

(D) Service affiliation, assigned unit, and location of 

the alleged offender, including information regarding 

whether the alleged offender has been temporarily transferred or removed from an assigned billet or ordered to 

pretrial confinement or otherwise restricted, if applicable. 

(E) Post-incident actions taken in connection with the 

incident, including the following: 

(i) Referral of the victim to a Sexual Assault 

Response Coordinator for referral to services available 

to members of the Armed Forces who are victims of 

sexual assault, including the date of each such referral. 

(ii) Notification of incident to appropriate military 

criminal investigative organization, including the 

organization notified and date of such notification. 

(iii) Receipt and processing status of a request 

for expedited victim transfer, if applicable. 

(iv) Issuance of any military protective orders in 

connection with the incident. 

(2) MODIFICATION.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may modify 

the elements required in a report under this section 

regarding an incident involving a member of the Armed 

Forces (including the Coast Guard when it is operating 

as service in the Department of the Navy) if the Secretary 

determines that such modification will facilitate compliance 

with best practices for such reporting as identified by the 

Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office of the 

Department of Defense. 

(B) COAST GUARD.—The Secretary of the Department 

in which the Coast Guard is operating may modify the 

elements required in a report under this section regarding 

an incident involving a member of the Coast Guard if 

the Secretary determines that such modification will facilitate compliance with best practices for such reporting as 

identified by the Coast Guard Office of Work-Life Programs. 

(d) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating 

shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section. 

SEC. 1744. REVIEW OF DECISIONS NOT TO REFER CHARGES OF CERTAIN SEX-RELATED OFFENSES FOR TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL. 

(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall require 

the Secretaries of the military departments to provide for 

review of decisions not to refer charges for trial by courtmartial in cases where a sex-related offense has been alleged 

by a victim of the alleged offense. 

(2) SPECIFIC REVIEW REQUIREMENTS.—As part of a review 

conducted pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary of a military 

department shall require that— 

(A) consideration be given to the victim’s statement 

provided during the course of the criminal investigation 
H. R. 3304—310 

regarding the alleged sex-related offense perpetrated 

against the victim; and 

(B) a determination be made whether the victim’s 

statement and views concerning disposition of the alleged 

sex-related offense were considered by the convening 

authority in making the referral decision. 

(b) SEX-RELATED OFFENSE DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘‘sex-related offense’’ means any of the following: 

(1) Rape or sexual assault under subsection (a) or (b) of 

section 920 of title 10, United States Code (article 120 of 

the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

(2) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of such title (article 

125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

(3) An attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph 

(1) or (2) as punishable under section 880 of such title (article 

80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

(c) REVIEW OF CASES NOT REFERRED TO COURT-MARTIAL FOLLOWING STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE RECOMMENDATION OF REFERRAL

FOR TRIAL.—In any case where a staff judge advocate, pursuant 

to section 834 of title 10, United States Code (article 34 of the 

Uniform Code of Military Justice), recommends that charges of 

a sex-related offense be referred for trial by court-martial and 

the convening authority decides not to refer any charges to a courtmartial, the convening authority shall forward the case file to 

the Secretary of the military department concerned for review as 

a superior authorized to exercise general court-martial convening 

authority. 

(d) REVIEW OF CASES NOT REFERRED TO COURT-MARTIAL FOLLOWING STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE RECOMMENDATION NOT TO REFER

FOR TRIAL.—In any case where a staff judge advocate, pursuant 

to section 834 of title 10, United States Code (article 34 of the 

Uniform Code of Military Justice), recommends that charges of 

a sex-related offense should not be referred for trial by courtmartial and the convening authority decides not to refer any charges 

to a court-martial, the convening authority shall forward the case 

file for review to the next superior commander authorized to exercise general court-martial convening authority. 

(e) ELEMENTS OF CASE FILE.—A case file forwarded to higher 

authority for review pursuant to subsection (c) or (d) shall include 

the following: 

(1) All charges and specifications preferred under section 

830 of title 10, United States Code (article 30 of the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice). 

(2) All reports of investigations of such charges, including 

the military criminal investigative organization investigation 

report and the report prepared under section 832 of title 10, 

United States Code (article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice), as amended by section 1702. 

(3) A certification that the victim of the alleged sex-related 

offense was notified of the opportunity to express views on 

the victim’s preferred disposition of the alleged offense for 

consideration by the convening authority. 

(4) All statements of the victim provided to the military 

criminal investigative organization and to the victim’s chain 

of command relating to the alleged sex-related offense and 

any statement provided by the victim to the convening authority 
H. R. 3304—311 

expressing the victim’s view on the victim’s preferred disposition of the alleged offense. 

(5) The written advice of the staff judge advocate to the 

convening authority pursuant to section 834 of title 10, United 

States Code (article 34 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

(6) A written statement explaining the reasons for the 

convening authority’s decision not to refer any charges for 

trial by court-martial. 

(7) A certification that the victim of the alleged sex-related 

offense was informed of the convening authority’s decision to 

forward the case as provided in subsection (c) or (d). 

(f) NOTICE ON RESULTS OR REVIEW.—The victim of the alleged 

sex-related offense shall be notified of the results of the review 

conducted under subsection (c) or (d) in the manner prescribed 

by the victims and witness assistance program of the Armed Force 

concerned. 

(g) VICTIM ALLEGATION OF SEX-RELATED OFFENSE.—The Secretary of Defense shall require the Secretaries of the military 

departments to develop a system to ensure that a victim of a 

possible sex-related offense under the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice is given the opportunity to state, either at the time of 

making an unrestricted report of the allegation or during the 

criminal investigation of the allegation, whether or not the victim 

believes that the offense alleged is a sex-related offense subject 

to the requirements of this section. 

SEC. 1745. INCLUSION AND COMMAND REVIEW OF INFORMATION ON 

SEX-RELATED OFFENSES IN PERSONNEL SERVICE 

RECORDS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) INFORMATION ON REPORTS ON SEX-RELATED OFFENSES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—If a complaint of a sex-related offense 

is made against a member of the Armed Forces and the member 

is convicted by court-martial or receives non-judicial punishment or punitive administrative action for such sex-related 

offense, a notation to that effect shall be placed in the personnel 

service record of the member, regardless of the member’s grade. 

(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the inclusion of information 

in personnel service records under paragraph (1) is to alert 

commanders to the members of their command who have 

received courts-martial conviction, non-judicial punishment, or 

punitive administrative action for sex-related offenses in order 

to reduce the likelihood that repeat offenses will escape the 

notice of commanders. 

(b) LIMITATION ON PLACEMENT.—A notation under subsection 

(a) may not be placed in the restricted section of the personnel 

service record of a member. 

(c) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in subsection (a) or (b) may be 

construed to prohibit or limit the capacity of a member of the 

Armed Forces to challenge or appeal the placement of a notation, 

or location of placement of a notation, in the member’s personnel 

service record in accordance with procedures otherwise applicable 

to such challenges or appeals. 

(d) COMMAND REVIEW OF HISTORY OF SEX-RELATED OFFENSES

OF MEMBERS UPON ASSIGNMENT OR TRANSFER TO NEW UNIT.— (1) REVIEW REQUIRED.—Under uniform regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the commanding officer 

of a facility, installation, or unit to which a member of the 
H. R. 3304—312 

Armed Forces described in paragraph (2) is permanently 

assigned or transferred shall review the history of sex-related 

offenses as documented in the personnel service record of the 

member in order to familiarize such officer with such history 

of the member. 

(2) COVERED MEMBERS.—A member of the Armed Forces 

described in this paragraph is a member of the Armed Forces 

who, at the time of assignment or transfer as described in 

paragraph (1), has a history of one or more sex-related offenses 

as documented in the personnel service record of such member 

or such other records or files as the Secretary shall specify 

in the regulations prescribed under paragraph (1). 

SEC. 1746. PREVENTION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT AT MILITARY SERVICE 

ACADEMIES. 

The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the United States 

Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, and the 

United States Air Force Academy include a section in the curricula 

of that military service academy that outlines honor, respect, and 

character development as such pertain to the issue of preventing 

sexual assault in the Armed Forces. Such curricula section shall 

include a brief history of the problem of sexual assault in the 

Armed Forces, a definition of sexual assault, information relating 

to reporting a sexual assault, victims’ rights, and dismissal and 

dishonorable discharge for offenders. Training in such section in 

the curricula shall be provided within 14 days after the initial 

arrival of a new cadet or midshipman at that military service 

academy and repeated annually thereafter. 

SEC. 1747. REQUIRED NOTIFICATION WHENEVER MEMBERS OF THE 

ARMED FORCES ARE COMPLETING STANDARD FORM 86 

OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY POSITIONS. 

(a) NOTIFICATION OF POLICY.—Whenever a member of the 

Armed Forces is required to complete Standard Form 86 of the 

Questionnaire for National Security Positions in connection with 

an application, investigation, or reinvestigation for a security clearance, the member shall be notified of the policy described in subsection (b) regarding question 21 of such form. 

(b) POLICY DESCRIBED.—The policy referred to in subsection 

(a) is the policy of instructing an individual to answer ‘‘no’’ to 

question 21 of Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National 

Security Positions with respect to consultation with a health care 

professional if— 

(1) the individual is a victim of a sexual assault; and 

(2) the consultation occurred with respect to an emotional 

or mental health condition strictly in relation to the sexual 

assault. 

Subtitle F—Sense of Congress Provisions 

SEC. 1751. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COMMANDING OFFICER RESPONSIBILITY FOR COMMAND CLIMATE FREE OF RETALIATION. 

It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) commanding officers in the Armed Forces are responsible for establishing a command climate in which sexual 

assault allegations are properly managed and fairly evaluated 
H. R. 3304—313 

and in which a victim can report criminal activity, including 

sexual assault, without fear of retaliation, including ostracism 

and group pressure from other members of the command; 

(2) the failure of commanding officers to maintain such 

a command climate is an appropriate basis for relief from 

their command positions; and 

(3) senior officers should evaluate subordinate commanding 

officers on their performance in establishing a command climate 

as described in paragraph (1) during the regular periodic counseling and performance appraisal process prescribed by the 

Armed Force concerned for inclusion in the systems of records 

maintained and used for assignment and promotion selection 

boards. 

SEC. 1752. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON DISPOSITION OF CHARGES 

INVOLVING CERTAIN SEXUAL MISCONDUCT OFFENSES 

UNDER THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE 

THROUGH COURTS-MARTIAL. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) any charge regarding an offense specified in subsection 

(b) should be disposed of by court-martial, rather than by 

non-judicial punishment or administrative action; and 

(2) in the case of any charge regarding an offense specified 

in subsection (b) that is disposed of by non-judicial punishment 

or administrative action, rather than by court-martial, the disposition authority should include in the case file a justification 

for the disposition of the charge by non-judicial punishment 

or administrative action, rather than by court-martial. 

(b) COVERED OFFENSES.—An offense specified in this subsection 

is any of the following offenses under chapter 47 of title 10, United 

States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice): 

(1) Rape or sexual assault under subsection (a) or (b) of 

section 920 of such title (article 120 of the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice). 

(2) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of such title (article 

125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

(3) An attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph 

(1) or (2), as punishable under section 880 of such title (article 

80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

SEC. 1753. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE DISCHARGE IN LIEU OF 

COURT-MARTIAL OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES 

WHO COMMIT SEX-RELATED OFFENSES. 

It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) the Armed Forces should be exceedingly sparing in 

discharging in lieu of court-martial members of the Armed 

Forces who have committed rape, sexual assault, forcible 

sodomy, or attempts to commit such offenses, and should do 

so only when the facts of the case clearly warrant such discharge; 

(2) whenever possible, the victims of offenses referred to 

in paragraph (1) shall be consulted prior to the determination 

regarding whether to discharge the members who committed 

such offenses; 

(3) convening authorities should consider the views of victims of offenses referred to in paragraph (1) when determining 

whether to discharge the members who committed such offenses 

in lieu of trying such members by court-martial; and 
H. R. 3304—314 

(4) the discharge of any member who is discharged as 

described in paragraph (1) should be characterized as Other 

Than Honorable. 

DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

AUTHORIZATIONS 

SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 

This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construction 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014’’. 

SEC. 2002. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AND AMOUNTS 

REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY LAW. 

(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER THREE YEARS.— 

Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained 

in titles XXI through XXVII for military construction projects, land 

acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions 

to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 

Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire 

on the later of— 

(1) October 1, 2016; or 

(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 

for military construction for fiscal year 2017. 

(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations 

for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing 

projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic 

Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have 

been obligated before the later of— 

(1) October 1, 2016; or 

(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 

for fiscal year 2017 for military construction projects, land 

acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program. 

TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY 

CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2102. Family housing. 

Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army. 

Sec. 2104. Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United States Military 

Academy, New York. 

Sec. 2105. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project. 

Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project. 

Sec. 2107. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project. 

Sec. 2108. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2010 projects. 

Sec. 2109. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 

SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 

and available for military construction projects inside the United 

States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military 
H. R. 3304—315 

construction projects for the installations or locations inside the 

United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Army: Inside the United States 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Alaska ..................... Fort Wainwright ....................................... $103,000,000 

Colorado .................. Fort Carson, Colorado .............................. $242,200,000 

Florida ..................... Eglin Air Force Base ................................ $4,700,000 

Georgia .................... Fort Gordon .............................................. $61,000,000 

Hawaii ..................... Fort Shafter .............................................. $70,000,000 

Kansas .................... Fort Leavenworth ..................................... $17,000,000 

Kentucky ................. Fort Campbell, Kentucky ........................ $4,800,000 

Maryland ................ Aberdeen Proving Ground ....................... $21,000,000 

Fort Detrick .............................................. $7,100,000 

Missouri .................. Fort Leonard Wood .................................. $90,700,000 

North Carolina ....... Fort Bragg ................................................ $5,900,000 

Texas ....................... Fort Bliss .................................................. $46,800,000 

Virginia ................... Joint Base Langley-Eustis ....................... $50,000,000 

Washington ............. Joint Base Lewis-McChord ...................... $144,000,000 

Yakima ...................................................... $9,100,00 

(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 

and available for military construction projects outside the United 

States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out the 

military construction project for the installations or locations outside 

the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following 

table: 

Army: Outside the United States 

Country Installation or Location Amount 

Japan ........................ Kyoga-Misaki ............................................ $33,000,000 

Marshall Islands ...... Kwajalein Atoll ......................................... $63,000,000 

SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 

(a) CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 

2103 and available for military family housing functions as specified 

in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 

may construct or acquire family housing units (including land 

acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in 

the following table: 

Army: Family Housing 

Country Installation Units Amount 

Germany ............. South Camp 

Vilseck.

29 ....................... $16,600,000 

Wisconsin ........... Fort McCoy ....... 56 ....................... $23,000,000 
H. R. 3304—316 

(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 

and available for military family housing functions as specified 

in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 

may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,408,000. 

SEC. 2103. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 

authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and 

military family housing functions of the Department of the Army 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— 

Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 

of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 

2101 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following: 

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 

subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 

4601. 

(2) $64,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 

under section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112– 

239; 126 Stat. 2119) for cadet barracks increment 2 at the 

United States Military Academy, New York). 

SEC. 2104. LIMITATION ON CONSTRUCTION OF CADET BARRACKS AT 

UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY, NEW YORK. 

No amounts may be obligated or expended for the construction 

of increment 2 of the Cadet Barracks at the United States Military 

Academy, New York, as authorized by section 2101(a) of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B 

of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119), until the Secretary of 

the Army certifies to the congressional defense committees that 

the Secretary intends to award a contract for the renovation of 

MacArthur Short Barracks at the United States Military Academy 

concurrent with assuming beneficial occupancy of the renovated 

Scott Barracks at the United States Military Academy. 

SEC. 2105. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL 

YEAR 2004 PROJECT. 

(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.—In connection with the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B 

of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1697) for Picatinny Arsenal, 

New Jersey, for construction of a Research and Development 

Loading Facility, the Secretary of the Army may carry out a military 

construction project in the amount of $4,500,000 to complete work 

on the facility within the initial scope of the project. 

(b) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of the Army 

shall provide information in accordance with section 2851(c) of 

title 10, United States Code, regarding the project described in 

subsection (a). 
H. R. 3304—317 

SEC. 2106. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 

FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECT. 

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 

section 2101(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2629) 

for Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, for construction of APS Warehouses, 

the Secretary of the Army may construct up to 74,976 square 

meters of hardstand parking, 22,741 square meters of access roads, 

a 6 megawatt power plant, and 50,724 square meters of humiditycontrolled warehouses. 

SEC. 2107. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 

FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECT. 

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 

section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 

4437) for Fort Lewis, Washington, for construction of a Regional 

Logistic Support Complex at the installation, the Secretary of the 

Army may construct up to 98,381 square yards of Organizational 

Vehicle Parking. 

SEC. 2108. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2010 PROJECTS. 

(a) EXTENSIONS.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B 

of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2627), the authorizations set forth 

in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that 

Act (126 Stat. 2628) and extended by section 2106 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B 

of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2121), shall remain in effect 

until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act 

authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, 

whichever is later. 

(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 

Army: Extension of 2010 Project Authorizations 

State Installation 

or Location Project Amount 

Virginia ............. Fort Belvoir Road and Access Control 

Point ................................ $9,500,000 

Washington ...... Fort Lewis ... Fort Lewis-McChord AFB 

Joint Access .................... $9,000,000 

Kuwait .............. Camp 

Arifjian.

APS Warehouses ................ $82,000,000 

SEC. 2109. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2011 PROJECTS. 

(a) EXTENSIONS.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B 

of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set 

forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 

of that Act (124 Stat. 4437), shall remain in effect until October 

1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 

for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later. 

(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
H. R. 3304—318 

Army: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations 

State Installation or 

Location Project Amount 

California ..... Presidio of Monterey.Advanced Individual Training Barracks ..................... $63,000,000 

Georgia ......... Fort Benning ......... Land Acquisition ................. $12,200,000 

New Mexico .. White Sands Missile Range.Barracks ............................... $29,000,000 

Germany ....... Wiesbaden Air 

Base.

Access Control Point ........... $5,100,000 

TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY 

CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2202. Family housing. 

Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. 

Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. 

Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project. 

Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project. 

Sec. 2207. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 

SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 

and available for military construction projects inside the United 

States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military 

construction projects for the installations or locations inside the 

United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Navy: Inside the United States 

State Installation or Location Amount 

California ................ Barstow ....................................................... $14,998,000 

Camp Pendleton ......................................... $13,124,000 

Coronado ..................................................... $8,910,000 

Point Mugu ................................................. $24,667,000 

Port Hueneme ............................................. $33,600,000 

San Diego .................................................... $34,331,000 

Twentynine Palms ..................................... $33,437,000 

Florida ..................... Jacksonville ................................................ $20,752,000 

Key West ..................................................... $14,001,000 

Mayport ....................................................... $16,093,000 

Georgia .................... Albany ......................................................... $16,610,000 

Savannah .................................................... $61,717,000 

Guam ....................... Joint Region Marianas ............................... $318,377,000 

Hawaii ..................... Kaneohe Bay ............................................... $236,982,000 

Pearl City .................................................... $30,100,000 

Pearl Harbor ............................................... $57,998,000 

Illinois ..................... Great Lakes ................................................ $35,851,000 

Maine ...................... Bangor ......................................................... $13,800,000 

Kittery ......................................................... $11,522,000 

Maryland ................ Fort Meade ................................................. $83,988,000 
H. R. 3304—319 

Navy: Inside the United States—Continued 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Nevada .................... Fallon .......................................................... $11,334,000 

North Carolina ....... Camp Lejeune ............................................. $77,999,000 

New River ................................................... $45,863,000 

Oklahoma ............... Tinker Air Force Base ............................... $14,144,000 

Rhode Island ........... Newport ....................................................... $12,422,000 

South Carolina ....... Charleston ................................................... $73,932,000 

Virginia ................... Dam Neck ................................................... $10,587,000 

Norfolk ........................................................ $3,380,000 

Quantico ...................................................... $38,374,000 

Yorktown ..................................................... $18,700,000 

Washington ............. Bremerton ................................................... $18,189,000 

Whidbey Island ........................................... $117,649,000 

(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 

and available for military construction projects outside the United 

States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military 

construction projects for the installation or location outside the 

United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Navy: Outside the United States 

Country Installation or Location Amount 

Djibouti ..................... Camp Lemonier .......................................... $29,000,000 

Japan ......................... Camp Butler ............................................... $5,820,000 

Yokosuka .................................................... $7,568,000 

SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 

appropriations in section 2204 and available for military family 

housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 

the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and 

engineering services and construction design activities with respect 

to the construction or improvement of family housing units in 

an amount not to exceed $4,438,000. 

SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 

Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and 

using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military family housing 

functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 

Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing 

units in an amount not to exceed $68,969,000. 

SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 

authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and 

military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy, 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— 

Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 
H. R. 3304—320 

of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 

2201 of this Act and the projects described in paragraphs (2) and 

(3) of this subsection may not exceed the sum of the following: 

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 

subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 

4601. 

(2) $357,877,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 

under section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112– 

81; 125 Stat. 1666) for an explosive handling wharf at Kitsap, 

Washington). 

(3) $68,196,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 

under section 2201(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111– 

84; 123 Stat. 2633) for ramp parking at Joint Region Marianas, 

Guam). 

SEC. 2205. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 

FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECT. 

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 

section 2201(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 

4441) for Southwest Asia, Bahrain, for construction of Navy Central 

Command Ammunition Magazines, the Secretary of the Navy may 

construct additional Type C earth covered magazines (to provide 

a project total of eighteen), ten new modular storage magazines, 

an inert storage facility, a maintenance and ground support equipment facility, concrete pads for portable ready service lockers, and 

associated supporting facilities using appropriations available for 

the project. 

SEC. 2206. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 

FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECT. 

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 

section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666) 

for Kitsap, Washington, for construction of Explosives Handling 

Wharf No. 2, the Secretary of the Navy may construct new hardened 

facilities in lieu of hardening existing structures and a new facility 

to replace the existing Coast Guard Maritime Force Protection 

Unit and the Naval Undersea Warfare Command unhardened facilities using appropriations available for the project. 

SEC. 2207. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2011 PROJECTS. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B 

of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set 

forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 

of that Act (124 Stat. 4441), shall remain in effect until October 

1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 

for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later. 

(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
H. R. 3304—321 

Navy: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations 

State/Country Installation or Location Project Amount 

Bahrain ..................... Southwest Asia ........ Navy Central Command Ammunition 

Magazines ............ $89,280,000 

Guam ........................ Naval Activities, 

Guam.

Defense Access 

Roads Improvements .................... $66,730,000 

TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE MILITARY 

CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2302. Family housing. 

Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units. 

Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. 

Sec. 2305. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 

project. 

Sec. 2306. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project. 

Sec. 2307. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project. 

SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 

ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304 

and available for military construction projects inside the United 

States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out 

military construction projects for the installations or locations inside 

the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 

table: 

Air Force: Inside the United States 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Arizona ................................ Luke Air Force Base .................. $26,900,000 

California ............................ Beale Air Force Base ................. $62,000,000 

Florida ................................. Tyndall Air Force Base ............. $9,100,000 

Guam ................................... Joint Region Marianas .............. $176,230,000 

Hawaii ................................. Joint Base Pearl HarborHickam.$4,800,000 

Kansas ................................. McConnell Air Force Base ........ $219,120,000 

Kentucky ............................. Fort Campbell ............................ $8,000,000 

Mariana Islands ................. Saipan ......................................... $29,300,000 

Maryland ............................. Fort Meade ................................. $358,000,000 

Joint Base Andrews ................... $30,000,000 

Missouri ............................... Whiteman Air Force Base ......... $5,900,000 

New Mexico ......................... Cannon Air Force Base ............. $34,100,000 

Holloman Air Force Base .......... $2,250,000 

Kirtland Air Force Base ............ $30,500,000 

Nevada ................................ Nellis Air Force Base ................. $78,500,000 

.............................................. ...................................................... ..............................

North Dakota ...................... Minot Air Force Base ................ $23,830,000 

Oklahoma ............................ Altus Air Force Base ................. $30,850,000 
H. R. 3304—322 

Air Force: Inside the United States—Continued 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Tinker Air Force Base ............... $8,600,000 

Texas ................................... Fort Bliss .................................... $3,350,000 

Utah ..................................... Hill Air Force Base .................... $32,000,000 

Virginia ............................... Joint Base Langley-Eustis ........ $4,800,000 

(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304 

and available for military construction projects outside the United 

States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out 

military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 

table: 

Air Force: Outside the United States 

Country Installation Amount 

Greenland ......................... Thule AB ............................. $43,904,000 

United Kingdom ............... RAF Lakenheath ................ $22,047,000 

SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 

appropriations in section 2304 and available for military family 

housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 

the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and 

engineering services and construction design activities with respect 

to the construction or improvement of family housing units in 

an amount not to exceed $4,267,000. 

SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 

Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and 

using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304 and available for military family housing 

functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 

Secretary of the Air Force may improve existing military family 

housing units in an amount not to exceed $72,093,000. 

SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 

authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and 

military family housing functions of the Department of the Air 

Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 

of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 

2301 of this Act and the project described in paragraph (2) of 

this subsection may not exceed the sum of the following: 

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 

subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 

4601. 
H. R. 3304—323 

(2) $69,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 

under section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112– 

81; 125 Stat. 1670) for the United States Strategic Command 

Headquarters at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska). 

SEC. 2305. LIMITATION ON PROJECT AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY OUT 

CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2014 PROJECT. 

No amounts may be obligated or expended for the construction 

of a maintenance facility, a hazardous cargo pad, or an airport 

storage facility in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 

Islands, as authorized by section 2301(a), until the Secretary of 

the Air Force submits a report to the congressional defense committees that provides— 

(1) a summary of alternatives considered to support divertfield operations associated with Andersen Air Force Base; 

(2) a description of the overall construction requirements 

to support divert-field operations associated with Andersen Air 

Force Base and any other alternative considered; and 

(3) a comparison of the costs and benefits of leasing, as 

compared to purchasing real estate in fee, that supports the 

entirety of the divert-field requirement. 

SEC. 2306. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 

FISCAL YEAR 2013 PROJECT. 

The table in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 

112–239; 126 Stat. 2126) is amended in the item relating to 

Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, for construction of a hangar by 

striking ‘‘$58,000,000’’ in the amount column and inserting 

‘‘$128,000,000’’. 

SEC. 2307. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2011 PROJECT. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B 

of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth 

in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that 

Act (124 Stat. 4444), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, 

or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 

construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later. 

(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 

Air Force: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization 

State Installation or 

Location Project Amount 

Bahrain .......... Southwest Asia ..... North Apron Expansion .. $45,000,000 

TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 

Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects. 

Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. 
H. R. 3304—324 

Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations 

Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, 

defense-wide. 

Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 

SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION AND 

LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 

and available for military construction projects inside the United 

States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military 

construction projects for the installations or locations inside the 

United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Alaska ............................... Clear Air Force Base ................... $17,204,000 

Fort Greely ................................... $82,000,000 

California .......................... Brawley ......................................... $23,095,000 

Defense Distribution DepotTracy .......................................... $37,554,000 

Miramar ........................................ $6,000,000 

Colorado ............................ Fort Carson .................................. $22,282,000 

Florida ............................... Hurlburt Field .............................. $7,900,000 

Jacksonville .................................. $7,500,000 

Key West ....................................... $3,600,000 

Panama City ................................. $2,600,000 

Tyndall Air Force Base ................ $9,500,000 

Georgia .............................. Fort Benning ................................ $43,335,000 

Fort Stewart ................................. $44,504,000 

Hunter Army Airfield .................. $13,500,000 

Moody Air Force Base ................. $3,800,000 

Hawaii ............................... Ford Island ................................... $2,615,000 

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam $2,800,000 

Kentucky ........................... Fort Campbell .............................. $124,211,000 

Fort Knox ...................................... $303,023,000 

Maryland ........................... Aberdeen Proving Ground ........... $210,000,000 

Bethesda Naval Hospital ............. $66,800,000 

Massachusetts .................. Hanscom Air Force Base ............. $36,213,000 

New Jersey ........................ Joint Base Mcguire-DixLakehurst .................................. $10,000,000 

New Mexico ....................... Holloman Air Force Base ............ $81,400,000 

North Carolina ................. Camp Lejeune .............................. $43,377,000 

Fort Bragg .................................... $172,065,000 

North Dakota .................... Minot Air Force Base ................... $6,400,000 

Oklahoma .......................... Altus Air Force Base ................... $2,100,000 

Tinker Air Force Base ................. $36,000,000 

Pennsylvania .................... Defense Distribution Depot New 

Cumberland .............................. $9,000,000 

South Carolina .................. Beaufort ........................................ $41,324,000 

Tennessee .......................... Arnold Air Force Base ................. $2,200,000 

Texas ................................. Joint Base San Antonio ............... $12,600,000 

Virginia ............................. Dam Neck ..................................... $11,147,000 
H. R. 3304—325 

Defense Agencies: Inside the United States—Continued 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Defense Distribution Depot Richmond .......................................... $87,000,000 

Joint Expeditionary Base Little 

Creek - Story ............................. $30,404,000 

Pentagon ....................................... $57,600,000 

Quantico ........................................ $40,586,000 

Washington ....................... Whidbey Island ............................ $10,000,000 

(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 

and available for military construction projects outside the United 

States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military 

construction projects for the installations or locations outside the 

United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 

Country Installation or Location Amount 

Bahrain Island ....... Southwest Asia ....................................... $45,400,000 

Belgium .................. Brussels ................................................... $67,613,000 

Germany ................. Kaiserlautern Air Base .......................... $49,907,000 

Ramstein Air Base .................................. $98,762,000 

Weisbaden ............................................... $109,655,000 

Japan ...................... Atsugi ...................................................... $4,100,000 

Iwakuni ................................................... $34,000,000 

Kadena Air Base ..................................... $38,792,000 

Kyoga-Misaki .......................................... $15,000,000 

Torri Commo Station .............................. $71,451,000 

Yokosuka ................................................. $10,600,000 

Korea ...................... Camp Walker .......................................... $52,164,000 

United Kingdom .... Royal Air Force Lakenheath .................. $69,638,000 

Royal Air Force Mildenhall .................... $84,629,000 

SEC. 2402. AUTHORIZED ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS. 

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 

and available for energy conservation projects inside the United 

States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under 

chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations 

or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set 

forth in the following table: 

Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Alabama .................. Anniston Army Depot ............. $2,700,000 

California ................ MCAS Miramar ...................... $17,968,000 

Parks DRTA ............................ $4,150,000 

Florida .................... NAS Jacksonville .................... $2,840,000 
H. R. 3304—326 

Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States— 

Continued 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Hawaii .................... Camp Smith ............................ $7,966,000 

Hickam .................................... $3,100,000 

Hickam .................................... $3,000,000 

Idaho ....................... Mountain Home ...................... $2,630,000 

Kansas .................... Tokepka Readiness Center .... $2,050,000 

Massachusetts ........ Devens ..................................... $2,600,000 

New York ................ US Military Academy ............. $3,200,000 

South Carolina ....... Shaw ........................................ $2,500,000 

Texas ....................... NAS Corpus Christi ................ $2,340,000 

Sheppard ................................. $3,779,000 

Laughlin .................................. $2,800,000 

Utah ........................ Dugway Proving Ground ........ $9,966,000 

Tooele Army Depot ................. $5,900,000 

Tooele Army Depot ................. $5,500,000 

Tooele Army Depot ................. $4,300,000 

Virginia ................... NSA Hampton Roads ............. $4,060,000 

Pentagon .................................. $2,120,000 

Various Locations .. Various Locations ................... $20,476,000 

(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 

and available for energy conservation projects outside the United 

States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under 

chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations 

or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set 

forth in the following table: 

Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United States 

Country Installation or Location Amount 

Germany .......................... Ramstein ......................... $2,140,000 

Greenland ....................... Thule ............................... $5,175,000 

Italy ................................. NAS Sigonella ................ $3,300,000 

Japan ............................... CFA Sasebo ..................... $14,766,000 

Yokota ............................. $5,674,000 

Various Locations ........... Various Locations ........... $3,000,000 

SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 

authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and 

military family housing functions of the Department of Defense 

(other than the military departments), as specified in the funding 

table in section 4601. 

(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— 

Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 

of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 
H. R. 3304—327 

2401 of this Act and the projects described in paragraphs (2) through 

(11) of this subsection may not exceed the sum of the following: 

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 

subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 

4601. 

(2) $190,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 

under section 2401(a) for an Ambulatory Care Center at Fort 

Knox, Kentucky). 

(3) $135,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 

under section 2401(a) for a Public Health Command, Aberdeen 

Proving Ground, Maryland). 

(4) $45,600,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 

under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112– 

239; 126 Stat. 2128) for NSAW Recapitalize Building #1 at 

Fort Meade, Maryland). 

(5) $20,800,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 

under section 2401(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112– 

239; 126 Stat. 2129) for the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense 

System Complex at Deveselu, Romania). 

(6) $175,639,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 

under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112– 

81; 125 Stat. 1672) for a data center at Fort Meade, Maryland). 

(7) $11,500,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 

under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112– 

81; 125 Stat. 1672) for an Ambulatory Care Center Phase 

III at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland). 

(8) $134,900,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 

under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112– 

81; 125 Stat. 1672) for an Ambulatory Care Center Phase 

III at Joint Base San Antonio, Texas). 

(9) $715,863,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 

under section 2401(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112– 

81; 125 Stat. 1673) for a hospital at the Rhine Ordnance Barracks, Germany). 

(10) $412,869,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 

under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111– 

84; 123 Stat. 2640) for a hospital at Fort Bliss, Texas). 

(11) $41,913,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 

as a Military Construction, Defense-Wide project by title X 

of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111– 

32; 123 Stat. 1888) for a data center at Camp Williams, Utah). 
H. R. 3304—328 

Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization 

Authorizations 

SEC. 2411. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 

authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction and land acquisition 

for chemical demilitarization, as specified in the funding table in 

section 4601. 

(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— 

Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 

of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under subsection 

(a) and the project described in paragraph (2) of this subsection 

may not exceed the sum of the following: 

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 

subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 

4601. 

(2) $36,433,000 (the balance of the amount authorized for 

ammunition demilitarization at Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky, by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public 

Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 835), as most recently amended by 

section 2412 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B Public Law 111–383; 124 

Stat. 4450). 

TITLE XXV—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY 

ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM 

Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. 

SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North 

Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount 

not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated 

for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from 

the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction 

previously financed by the United States. 

SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 

beginning after September 30, 2013, for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States 

Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects 

for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 

Program authorized by section 2501 as specified in the funding 

table in section 4601. 
H. R. 3304—329 

TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND RESERVE 

FORCES FACILITIES 

Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects. 

Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and 

land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects. 

Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

Sec. 2611. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project. 

Sec. 2612. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 

Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and 

Authorization of Appropriations 

SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND 

LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 

appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 

and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 

the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry 

out military construction projects for the Army National Guard 

locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth 

in the following table: 

Army National Guard: Inside the United States 

State Location Amount 

Alabama ................... Decatur ...................................................... $4,000,000 

Arkansas .................. Fort Chaffee ............................................... $21,000,000 

Florida ...................... Pinellas Park ............................................. $5,700,000 

Illinois ...................... Kankakee ................................................... $42,000,000 

Massachusetts ......... Camp Edwards .......................................... $19,000,000 

Michigan .................. Camp Grayling .......................................... $17,000,000 

Minnesota ................ Stillwater ................................................... $17,000,000 

Mississippi ............... Camp Shelby ............................................. $3,000,000 

................................... Pascagoula ................................................. $4,500,000 

Missouri ................... Macon ......................................................... $9,100,000 

Whiteman AFB .......................................... $5,000,000 

New York ................. New York ................................................... $31,000,000 

Ohio .......................... Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant .......... $5,200,000 

Pennsylvania ........... Fort Indiantown Gap ................................ $40,000,000 

Puerto Rico .............. Camp Santiago .......................................... $5,600,000 

South Carolina ........ Greenville .................................................. $26,000,000 

Texas ........................ Fort Worth ................................................. $14,270,000 

Wyoming .................. Afton ........................................................... $10,200,000 
H. R. 3304—330 

SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 

ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 

appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 

and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 

the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry 

out military construction projects for the Army Reserve locations 

inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the 

following table: 

Army Reserve 

State Location Amount 

California ...................... Camp Parks .......................................... $17,500,000 

Fort Hunter Liggett ............................. $16,500,000 

Maryland ...................... Bowie ..................................................... $25,500,000 

North Carolina ............. Fort Bragg ............................................. $24,500,000 

New Jersey ................... Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst .... $36,200,000 

New York ...................... Bullville ................................................. $14,500,000 

Wisconsin ..................... Fort McCoy ............................................ $23,400,000 

SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE 

CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 

appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 

and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 

the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry 

out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine 

Corps Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the 

amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 

State Location Amount 

California ....................... March Air Force Base ......................... $11,086,000 

Missouri ......................... Kansas City .......................................... $15,020,000 

Tennessee ...................... Memphis ............................................... $4,330,000 

SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND 

LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 

appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 

and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 

the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and 

carry out military construction projects for the Air National Guard 

locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth 

in the following table: 

Air National Guard 

State Location Amount 

Alabama ......................... Birmingham International Airport ... $8,500,000 

Indiana ........................... Hulman Regional Airport ................... $7,300,000 

Maryland ....................... Fort Meade .......................................... $4,000,000 
H. R. 3304—331 

Air National Guard—Continued 

State Location Amount 

Martin State Airport .......................... $8,000,000 

Montana ......................... Great Falls International Airport ..... $22,000,000 

New York ....................... Fort Drum ........................................... $4,700,000 

Ohio ................................ Springfield Beckley-Map .................... $7,200,000 

Pennsylvania .................. Fort Indiantown Gap .......................... $7,700,000 

Rhode Island .................. Quonset State Airport ........................ $6,000,000 

Tennessee ....................... Mcghee-Tyson Airport ........................ $18,000,000 

SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND 

LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 

appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 

and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, 

the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and 

carry out military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve 

locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth 

in the following table: 

Air Force Reserve 

State Location Amount 

California ...................... March Air Force Base .......................... $19,900,000 

Florida .......................... Homestead Air Reserve Base .............. $9,800,000 

Oklahoma ..................... Tinker Air Force Base .......................... $12,200,000 

SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATIONAL GUARD 

AND RESERVE. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 

authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and 

engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard 

and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 

1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition 

of land for those facilities), as specified in the funding table in 

section 4601. 

(b) LIMITATION ON COMMENCING CERTAIN PROJECTS.—No 

amounts may be obligated or expended for the projects associated 

with the 175th Network Warfare Squadron Facility at Fort Meade, 

Maryland, or the Cyber/ISR Facility at Martin State Airport, Maryland, as authorized by section 2604, until the date on which the 

Commander of the United States Cyber Command certifies to the 

congressional defense committees, and provides adequate supporting documentation, that— 

(1) the scope of the military construction projects referred 

to in this subsection is consistent with the organizational manning construct being developed by the United States Cyber 

Command; 

(2) units operating within such facilities will be trained 

to the readiness standards set by the Armed Force concerned 

and the United States Cyber Command for the missions to 

which these units will be assigned; 
H. R. 3304—332 

(3) plans for proper mitigation measures will be implemented to prevent inadvertent disclosure of classified information; and 

(4) rules exist or will be developed to control access to 

classified systems operating pursuant to authorities under title 

10, United States Code, when operations are conducted pursuant to authorities under title 32, United States Code. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

SEC. 2611. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 

FISCAL YEAR 2013 PROJECT. 

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 

section 2603 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 

2135) for Fort Des Moines, Iowa, for construction of a Joint Reserve 

Center at that location, the Secretary of the Navy may, instead 

of constructing a new facility at Camp Dodge, acquire up to approximately 20 acres to construct a Joint Reserve Center and associated 

supporting facilities in the greater Des Moines, Iowa, area using 

amounts appropriated for the project pursuant to the authorization 

of appropriations in section 2606 of such Act (126 Stat. 2136). 

SEC. 2612. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2011 PROJECTS. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B 

of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set 

forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2601, 

2602, and 2604 of that Act (124 Stat. 4452, 4453, 4454), shall 

remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment 

of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal 

year 2015, whichever is later. 

(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 

Extension of 2011 National Guard and Reserve Project Authorizations 

State Installation or Location Project Amount 

Puerto Rice .............. Camp Santiago ....... Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range $9,200,000 

Tennessee ................. Nashville International Airport .. Intelligence Group 

and Remotely Piloted Aircraft Remote Split Operations Group ........ $5,500,000 

Virginia .................... Fort Story ................ Army Reserve Center ......................... $11,000,000 
H. R. 3304—333 

TITLE XXVII—BASE REALIGNMENT AND 

CLOSURE ACTIVITIES 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

Sec. 2711. Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and Closure 

(BRAC) round. 

Sec. 2712. Elimination of quarterly certification requirement regarding availability 

of military health care in National Capital Region. 

Sec. 2713. Report on 2005 base closure and realignment joint basing initiative. 

Subtitle A—Authorization of 

Appropriations 

SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES FUNDED THROUGH 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 

beginning after September 30, 2013, for base realignment and closure activities, including real property acquisition and military 

construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure 

and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 

101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department 

of Defense Base Closure Account established by section 2906 of 

such Act (as amended by section 2711 of the Military Construction 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 

112–239; 126 Stat. 2140)), as specified in the funding table in 

section 4601. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

SEC. 2711. PROHIBITION ON CONDUCTING ADDITIONAL BASE 

REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) ROUND. 

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an additional 

Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round. 

SEC. 2712. ELIMINATION OF QUARTERLY CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF MILITARY HEALTH 

CARE IN NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION. 

Section 1674(c) of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public 

Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 483) is amended by striking ‘‘on a quarterly 

basis’’. 

SEC. 2713. REPORT ON 2005 BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT JOINT 

BASING INITIATIVE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for 

Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the 2005 base closure and 

realignment joint basing initiative. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required under subsection (a) shall 

include the following elements: 
H. R. 3304—334 

(1) An analysis and explanation of the costs necessary 

to implement the joint basing initiative. 

(2) An analysis and explanation of any savings achieved 

to date and planned in future years, including quantifiable 

goals and a timeline for meeting such goals. 

(3) A description of implementation challenges and other 

lessons learned. 

(4) An assessment of any additional savings that could 

be achieved through more rigorous management and streamlined administration of joint bases. 

(5) Any other matters the Under Secretary considers appropriate. 

TITLE XXVIII—MILITARY 

CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes 

Sec. 2801. Modification and extension of authority to utilize unspecified minor military construction authority for laboratory revitalization projects. 

Sec. 2802. Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited partnerships with private developers of housing. 

Sec. 2803. Military construction standards to improve force protection. 

Sec. 2804. Application of cash payments received for utilities and services. 

Sec. 2805. Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of military housing 

investment authority. 

Sec. 2806. Additional element for annual report on military housing privatization 

projects. 

Sec. 2807. Policies and requirements regarding overseas military construction and 

closure and realignment of United States military installations in foreign countries. 

Sec. 2808. Extension and modification of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects in certain areas 

outside the United States. 

Sec. 2809. Limitation on construction projects in European Command area of responsibility. 

Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration 

Sec. 2811. Development of master plans for major military installations. 

Sec. 2812. Authority for acceptance of funds to cover administrative expenses associated with real property leases and easements. 

Sec. 2813. Modification of authority to enter into long-term contracts for receipt of 

utility services as consideration for utility systems conveyances. 

Sec. 2814. Report on efficient utilization of Department of Defense real property. 

Sec. 2815. Conditions on Department of Defense expansion of Pin ̃ on Canyon Maneuver Site, Fort Carson, Colorado. 

Subtitle C—Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment 

Sec. 2821. Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal year for period 

covered by annual report of Interagency Coordination Group of Inspectors General for Guam Realignment. 

Sec. 2822. Realignment of Marines Corps forces in Asia-Pacific Region. 

Subtitle D—Land Conveyances 

Sec. 2831. Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County, California. 

Sec. 2832. Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura County, California. 

Sec. 2833. Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii. 

Sec. 2834. Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 

Sec. 2835. Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah. 

Sec. 2836. Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis Peak, Wasatch 

Mountains, Utah. 

Sec. 2837. Land conveyances, former United States Army Reserve Centers, Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania. 
H. R. 3304—335 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Sec. 2841. Repeal of annual Economic Adjustment Committee reporting requirement. 

Sec. 2842. Establishment of military divers memorial. 

Subtitle A—Military Construction Program 

and Military Family Housing Changes 

SEC. 2801. MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO UTILIZE 

UNSPECIFIED MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

AUTHORITY FOR LABORATORY REVITALIZATION 

PROJECTS. 

(a) MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 

2805(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ‘‘not more than $2,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘not more than $4,000,000, notwithstanding subsection (c)’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking the first sentence and 

inserting the following: ‘‘For purposes of this subsection, an 

unspecified minor military construction project is a military 

construction project that (notwithstanding subsection (a)) has 

an approved cost equal to or less than $4,000,000.’’; and 

(3) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘2016’’ and inserting 

‘‘2018’’. 

(b) NO APPLICATION TO CURRENT PROJECTS.—The amendments 

made by subsection (a) do not apply to any laboratory revitalization 

project for which the design phase has been completed as of the 

date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 2802. REPEAL OF SEPARATE AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIPS WITH PRIVATE DEVELOPERS OF 

HOUSING. 

(a) REPEAL.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 2837 of title 10, United States 

Code, is repealed. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 

beginning of subchapter II of chapter 169 of such title is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 2837. 

(b) EFFECT ON EXISTING CONTRACTS.—The repeal of section 

2837 of title 10, United States Code, shall not affect the validity 

or terms of any contract in connection with a limited partnership 

under subsection (a) or a collateral incentive agreement under 

subsection (b) of such section entered into before the date of the 

enactment of this Act. 

(c) EFFECT ON DEFENSE HOUSING INVESTMENT ACCOUNT.—Any 

unobligated amounts remaining in the Defense Housing Investment 

Account on the date of the enactment of this Act shall be transferred 

to the Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund. 

Amounts transferred shall be merged with amounts in such fund 

and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the 

same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund. 

SEC. 2803. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS TO IMPROVE FORCE 

PROTECTION. 

(a) CONSIDERATION OF OTHER AVAILABLE SECURITY OR FORCEPROTECTION MEASURES.—Section 2859(a)(2) of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘develop construction standards 
H. R. 3304—336 

designed’’ and inserting ‘‘develop construction standards that, 

taking into consideration other security or force-protection measures 

available for the facility or military installation concerned, are 

designed’’. 

(b) REPORT ON CURRENT AND ADDITIONAL SECURITY SYSTEMS

AND TECHNOLOGIES.— 

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than June 1, 2014, the 

Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report describing and evaluating— 

(A) current expeditionary physical barrier systems; and 

(B) new systems or technologies that are being used 

for, or can be adopted for use for, force protection, including 

providing blast protection for forces supporting contingency 

operations. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by this subsection 

shall include the following: 

(A) A review of current and projected threats in connection with force protection, a description of any recent 

changes to policies on force protection, and an assessment 

of current planning methods on force protection, including 

standoff distances and physical barriers, to provide consistent and adequate levels of force protection. 

(B) An assessment of the use of expeditionary physical 

barrier systems to meet the goals of the combatant commands for force protection and force resiliency. 

(C) A description of the specifications developed by 

the Department of Defense to meet requirements for 

effectiveness, affordability, lifecycle management, and 

reuse or disposal of expeditionary physical barrier systems. 

(D) A description of the process used within the Department to ensure appropriate consideration of the decommissioning cost, environmental impact, and subsequent disposal of expeditionary physical barrier materials in the 

procurement process for such materials. 

(E) An assessment of the availability of new technologies or designs that improve the capabilities or lifecycle 

costs of expeditionary physical barrier systems. 

(3) FORMS OF REPORT.—The report required by this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include 

a classified annex. 

SEC. 2804. APPLICATION OF CASH PAYMENTS RECEIVED FOR UTILITIES AND SERVICES. 

Section 2872a(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘under paragraph (1) shall be’’ and all that 

follows through ‘‘was paid.’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘under 

paragraph (1) as reimbursement for the cost of furnishing utilities or services shall— 

‘‘(A) in the case of a cost paid using funds appropriated 

or otherwise made available before October 1, 2014, be credited 

to the appropriation or working capital account from which 

the cost of furnishing utilities or services concerned was paid; 

or 

‘‘(B) in the case of a cost paid using funds appropriated 

or otherwise made available on or after October 1, 2014, be 
H. R. 3304—337 

credited to the appropriation or working capital account currently available for the purpose of furnishing utilities or services under subsection (a).’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘Amounts so credited’’ and inserting the 

following: 

‘‘(3) Amounts credited under paragraph (2)’’. 

SEC. 2805. REPEAL OF ADVANCE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR 

USE OF MILITARY HOUSING INVESTMENT AUTHORITY. 

Section 2875 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

striking subsection (e). 

SEC. 2806. ADDITIONAL ELEMENT FOR ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY 

HOUSING PRIVATIZATION PROJECTS. 

Section 2884(c)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘‘, to specifically include any unique variances associated with litigation costs’’. 

SEC. 2807. POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS REGARDING OVERSEAS 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT OF UNITED STATES MILITARY INSTALLATIONS IN 

FOREIGN COUNTRIES. 

(a) OVERSEAS BASE CLOSURES AND REALIGNMENTS AND BASING

MASTER PLANS.—Section 2687a of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 2687a. Overseas base closures and realignments and 

basing master plans 

‘‘(a) ANNUAL REPORT ON STATUS OF OVERSEAS CLOSURES AND

REALIGNMENTS AND MASTER PLANS.—(1) At the same time that 

the budget is submitted under section 1105(a) of title 31 for a 

fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations 

of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House 

of Representatives a report on— 

‘‘(A) the status of overseas base closure and realignment 

actions undertaken as part of a global defense posture realignment strategy; and 

‘‘(B) the status of development and execution of comprehensive master plans for overseas military main operating bases, 

forward operating sites, and cooperative security locations. 

‘‘(2) A report under paragraph (1) shall address the following: 

‘‘(A) How the master plans described in paragraph (1)(B) 

would support the security commitments undertaken by the 

United States pursuant to any international security treaty. 

‘‘(B) The impact of such plans on the current security 

environments in the combatant commands, including United 

States participation in theater security cooperation activities 

and bilateral partnership, exchanges, and training exercises. 

‘‘(C) Any comments of the Secretary of Defense resulting 

from an interagency review of these plans that includes the 

Department of State and other Federal departments and agencies that the Secretary of Defense considers necessary for 

national security. 

‘‘(b) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OVERSEAS MILITARY FACILITY

INVESTMENT RECOVERY ACCOUNT.—(1) Except as provided in subsection (c), amounts paid to the United States, pursuant to any 

treaty, status of forces agreement, or other international agreement 
H. R. 3304—338 

to which the United States is a party, for the residual value of 

real property or improvements to real property used by civilian 

or military personnel of the Department of Defense shall be deposited into the Department of Defense Overseas Military Facility 

Investment Recovery Account. 

‘‘(2) Money deposited in the Department of Defense Overseas 

Military Facility Investment Recovery Account shall be available 

to the Secretary of Defense for payment, as provided in appropriation Acts, of costs incurred by the Department of Defense in connection with— 

‘‘(A) military construction, facility maintenance and repair, 

and environmental restoration at military installations in the 

United States; and 

‘‘(B) military construction, facility maintenance and repair, 

and compliance with applicable environmental laws at military 

installations outside the United States at which the Secretary 

anticipates the United States will have an enduring presence. 

‘‘(3) Funds in the Department of Defense Overseas Facility 

Investment Recovery Account shall remain available until expended. 

‘‘(4) Not later than December 1 of each year, the Secretary 

of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees 

a report detailing all expenditures made from the Department 

of Defense Overseas Facility Investment Recovery Account during 

the preceding fiscal year. 

‘‘(c) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS CORRESPONDING TO THE VALUE

OF PROPERTY PURCHASED WITH NONAPPROPRIATED FUNDS.—In the 

case of a payment referred to in subsection (b)(1) for the residual 

value of real property or improvements at an overseas military 

facility, the portion of the payment that is equal to the depreciated 

value of the investment made with nonappropriated funds shall 

be deposited in the reserve account established under section 

204(b)(7)(C) of the Defense Authorization Amendments and Base 

Closure and Realignment Act (Public Law 100–526; 10 U.S.C. 2687 

note). The Secretary of Defense may use amounts in the account 

(in such an aggregate amount as is provided in advance by appropriation Acts) for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, or 

improving commissary stores and nonappropriated fund instrumentalities. 

‘‘(d) OMB REVIEW OF PROPOSED OVERSEAS BASING SETTLE- MENTS.—(1) The Secretary of Defense may not enter into an agreement of settlement with a host country regarding the release to 

the host country of improvements made by the United States to 

facilities at an installation located in the host country until 30 

days after the date on which the Secretary submits the proposed 

settlement to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. 

The prohibition set forth in the preceding sentence shall apply 

only to agreements of settlement for improvements having a value 

in excess of $10,000,000. The Director shall evaluate the overall 

equity of the proposed settlement. In evaluating the proposed settlement, the Director shall consider such factors as the extent of 

the United States capital investment in the improvements being 

released to the host country, the depreciation of the improvements, 

the condition of the improvements, and any applicable requirements 

for environmental remediation or restoration at the installation. 

‘‘(2) Each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives a report on each proposed agreement of settlement 
H. R. 3304—339 

that was not submitted by the Secretary to the Director of the 

Office of Management and Budget in the previous year under paragraph (1) because the value of the improvements to be released 

pursuant to the proposed agreement did not exceed $10,000,000. 

‘‘(e) CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT OF USE OF PAYMENTS-IN-KIND

FOR CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATIONS.—(1) Before concluding an 

agreement for acceptance of military construction or facility 

improvements as a payment-in-kind, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a notification on 

the proposed agreement. Any such notification shall contain the 

following: 

‘‘(A) A description of the military construction project or 

facility improvement project. 

‘‘(B) An explanation of the military requirement to be satisfied with the project. 

‘‘(C) A certification that the project is included in the current future-years defense program. 

‘‘(2) Before concluding an agreement for acceptance of host 

nation support or host nation payment of operating costs of United 

States forces as a payment-in-kind, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a notification on 

the proposed agreement. Any such notification shall contain the 

following: 

‘‘(A) A description of each activity to be covered by the 

payment-in-kind. 

‘‘(B) A certification that the costs to be covered by the 

payment-in-kind are included in the budget of one or more 

of the military departments or that it will otherwise be necessary to provide for payment of such costs in a budget of 

one or more of the military departments in the current or 

the next fiscal year. 

‘‘(3) When the Secretary of Defense submits a notification of 

a proposed agreement under paragraph (1) or (2), the Secretary 

may then enter into the agreement described in the notification 

only after the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date 

on which the notification is submitted or, if earlier, the end of 

the 14-day period beginning on the date on which a copy of the 

notification is provided in an electronic medium pursuant to section 

480 of this title. 

‘‘(f) AUTHORIZED USE OF PAYMENTS-IN-KIND.—(1) A military 

construction project, as defined in chapter 159 of this title, may 

be accepted as a payment-in-kind contribution pursuant to a 

bilateral agreement with a host country only if that military 

construction project is authorized by law. 

‘‘(2) Operations of United States forces may be funded through 

a payment-in-kind contribution under this section only if the costs 

covered by such payment are included in the budget justification 

documents for the Department of Defense submitted to Congress 

in connection with the budget submitted under 1105 of title 31. 

‘‘(3) If funds previously appropriated for a military construction 

project, facility improvement, or operating costs are subsequently 

addressed in an agreement for a payment-in-kind contribution, 

the Secretary of Defense shall return to the Treasury funds in 

the amount equal to the value of the appropriated funds. 

‘‘(4) This subsection does not apply to a military construction 

project that— 
H. R. 3304—340 

‘‘(A) was specified in a bilateral agreement with a host 

country that was entered into prior to the date of the enactment 

of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2014; 

‘‘(B) was accepted as payment-in-kind for the residual value 

of improvements made by the United States at military installations released to the host country under section 2921 of the 

Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 

(division B of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) prior 

to the date of the enactment of the Military Construction 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014; or 

‘‘(C) subject to paragraph (5), will cost less than the cost 

specified in subsection (a)(2) of section 2805 of this title for 

certain unspecified minor military construction projects. 

‘‘(5) In the case of a military construction project excluded 

pursuant to paragraph (4)(C) whose cost will exceed the cost specified in subsection (b) of section 2805 of this title for certain unspecified minor military construction projects, the congressional notification requirements and waiting period specified in paragraph (2) 

of such subsection shall apply. 

‘‘(g) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘fair market value of the improvements’ 

means the value of improvements determined by the Secretary 

of Defense on the basis of their highest use. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘improvements’ includes new construction 

of facilities and all additions, improvements, modifications, or 

renovations made to existing facilities or to real property, without regard to whether they were carried out with appropriated 

or nonappropriated funds. 

‘‘(3) The term ‘nonappropriated funds’ means funds received 

from— 

‘‘(A) the adjustment of, or surcharge on, selling prices 

at commissary stores fixed under section 2685 of this title; 

or 

‘‘(B) a nonappropriated fund instrumentality. 

‘‘(4) The term ‘nonappropriated fund instrumentality’ 

means an instrumentality of the United States under the jurisdiction of the armed forces (including the Army and Air Force 

Exchange Service, the Navy Resale and Services Support Office, 

and the Marine Corps exchanges) which is conducted for the 

comfort, pleasure, contentment, or physical or mental improvement of members of the armed forces.’’. 

(b) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED PROVISIONS RELATED TO OVERSEAS

BASE CLOSURES AND REALIGNMENTS .— 

(1) REPEAL; RETENTION OF SENSE OF CONGRESS.—Section 

2921 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—’’; and 

(B) by striking subsections (b) through (g). 

(2) TREATMENT OF SPECIAL ACCOUNT.—The repeal of subsection (c) of section 2921 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 1991 by paragraph (1)(B) shall not affect 

the Department of Defense Overseas Military Facility Investment Recovery Account established by such subsection, 

amounts in such account, or the continued use of such account 

as provided in section 2687a of title 10, United States Code, 

as amended by subsection (a) of this section. 
H. R. 3304—341 

(c) REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO PAYMENT-IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS PURSUANT TO BILATERAL AGREEMENTS WITH HOST COUNTRIES.—Section 2802 of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d)(1) The requirement under subsection (a) that a military 

construction project must be authorized by law includes military 

construction projects funded through payment-in-kind contributions 

pursuant to a bilateral agreement with a host country. 

‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense or the Secretary concerned shall 

include military construction projects covered under paragraph (1) 

in the budget justification documents for the Department of Defense 

submitted to Congress in connection with the budget for a fiscal 

year submitted under 1105 of title 31. 

‘‘(3) This subsection does not apply to a military construction 

project that— 

‘‘(A) was specified in a bilateral agreement with a host 

country that was entered into prior to the date of the enactment 

of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2014; 

‘‘(B) was accepted as payment-in-kind for the residual value 

of improvements made by the United States at military installations released to the host country under section 2921 of the 

Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 

(division B of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) prior 

to the date of the enactment of the Military Construction 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014; or 

‘‘(C) will cost less than the cost specified in subsection 

(a)(2) of section 2805 of this title for certain unspecified minor 

military construction projects. 

‘‘(4) In the case of a military construction project excluded 

pursuant to paragraph (3)(C) whose cost will exceed the cost specified in subsection (b) of section 2805 of this title for certain unspecified minor military construction projects, the congressional notification requirements and waiting period specified in paragraph (2) 

of such subsection shall apply.’’. 

SEC. 2808. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF TEMPORARY, LIMITED 

AUTHORITY TO USE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN CERTAIN 

AREAS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES. 

Section 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 

1723), as most recently amended by section 2804 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B 

of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2149), is further amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and all 

that follows through ‘‘conditions:’’ and inserting ‘‘The Secretary 

of Defense may obligate appropriated funds available for operation and maintenance to carry out, inside the area of responsibility of the United States Central Command or certain countries in the area of responsibility of the United States Africa 

Command, a construction project that the Secretary determines 

meets each of the following conditions:’’; 

(2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘shall not exceed’’ and 

all that follows through the period at the end and inserting 

‘‘shall not exceed $100,000,000 between October 1, 2013, and 

the earlier of December 31, 2014, or the date of the enactment 
H. R. 3304—342 

of an Act authorizing funds for military activities of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015.’’; 

(3) in subsection (h)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2013’’ 

and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2014’’ 

and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2015’’; and 

(4) by striking subsection (i) and inserting the following 

new subsection: 

‘‘(i) CERTAIN COUNTRIES IN THE AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY OF

UNITED STATES AFRICA COMMAND DEFINED.—In this section, the 

term ‘certain countries in the area of responsibility of the United 

States Africa Command’ means Kenya, Somalia, Ethiopia, Djibouti, 

Seychelles, Burundi, and Uganda.’’. 

SEC. 2809. LIMITATION ON CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN EUROPEAN 

COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in subjection (b), the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department shall 

not award any contract in connection with a construction project 

authorized by this division to be carried out at an installation 

operated in the European Command area of responsibility until 

the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense 

committees that— 

(1) the installation and specific military construction 

requirement— 

(A) have been assessed as part of the basing assessment initiated by the Secretary of Defense on January 

25, 2013 (known as the ‘‘European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment’’); and 

(B) have been determined, pursuant to such assessment, to be of an enduring nature; and 

(2) the specific military construction requirement most 

effectively meets combatant commander requirements at the 

authorized location. 

(b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subsection (a) does not apply with respect 

to a construction project that— 

(1) is authorized by law before the date of the enactment 

of this Act; 

(2) is carried out at an installation located in Greenland; 

(3) is funded through the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program or intended to specifically 

support the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; or 

(4) is carried out under the authority of, and subject to 

the limits specified in, section 2805 of title 10, United States 

Code. 

Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities 

Administration 

SEC. 2811. DEVELOPMENT OF MASTER PLANS FOR MAJOR MILITARY 

INSTALLATIONS. 

Section 2864 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘At a time’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) At a 

time’’; and 
H. R. 3304—343 

(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) To address the requirements under paragraph (1), each 

installation master plan shall include consideration of— 

‘‘(A) planning for compact and infill development; 

‘‘(B) horizontal and vertical mixed-use development; 

‘‘(C) the full lifecycle costs of real property planning 

decisions; and 

‘‘(D) capacity planning through the establishment of growth 

boundaries around cantonment areas to focus development 

towards the core and preserve range and training space.’’; 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘The transportation’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) 

The transportation’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) To address the requirements under subsection (a) and 

paragraph (1), each installation master plan shall include consideration of ways to diversify and connect transit systems.’’; 

(3) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and 

(4) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—Nothing in this section shall supersede 

the requirements of section 2859(a) of this title.’’. 

SEC. 2812. AUTHORITY FOR ACCEPTANCE OF FUNDS TO COVER 

ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH REAL 

PROPERTY LEASES AND EASEMENTS. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—Subsection (e)(1)(C) of section 2667 of title 

10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

following new clause: 

‘‘(vi) Administrative expenses incurred by the Secretary 

concerned under this section and for easements under section 

2668 of this title.’’. 

(b) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES DEFINED.—Subsection (i) of such 

section is amended— 

(1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as paragraphs (2) through (5), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting before paragraph (2), as so redesignated, 

the following new paragraph (1): 

‘‘(1) The term ‘administrative expenses’ means only those 

expenses related to assessing, negotiating, executing, and managing lease and easement transactions. The term does not 

include any Government personnel costs.’’. 

SEC. 2813. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO LONG-TERM 

CONTRACTS FOR RECEIPT OF UTILITY SERVICES AS 

CONSIDERATION FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS CONVEYANCES. 

Section 2688(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘The determination 

of cost effectiveness shall be made using a business case analysis 

that includes an independent estimate of the level of investment 

that should be required to maintain adequate operation of the 

utility system over the proposed term of the contract.’’. 

SEC. 2814. REPORT ON EFFICIENT UTILIZATION OF DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE REAL PROPERTY. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
H. R. 3304—344 

to Congress a report on the efficient utilization of real property 

across the Department of Defense. 

(b) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—The report required by subsection 

(a) shall describe the following: 

(1) The strategy of the Department of Defense for maximizing efficient utilization of existing facilities, progress implementing this strategy, and obstacles to implementing this 

strategy. 

(2) The efforts of the Department of Defense to systematically collect, process, and analyze data on the efficient utilization of real property to aid in the planning and implementation 

of the strategy referred to in paragraph (1). 

(3) The number of underutilized Department facilities, to 

be defined as facilities rated less than 66 percent utilization, 

and unutilized Department facilities, to be defined as facilities 

rated at zero percent utilization, in the Real Property Inventory 

Database of the Department of Defense. 

(4) The annual cost of maintaining and improving such 

underutilized and unutilized Department facilities. 

(5) The efforts of the Department of Defense to dispose 

of underutilized and unutilized facilities. 

(c) CLASSIFIED ANNEX.—The report required by subsection (a) 

may include a classified annex if necessary to fully describe the 

matters required by subsection (b). 

SEC. 2815. CONDITIONS ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EXPANSION 

OF PIN ̃ ON CANYON MANEUVER SITE, FORT CARSON, 

COLORADO. 

The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army may 

not acquire, by purchase, condemnation, or other means, any land 

to expand the size of the Pin ̃ on Canyon Maneuver Site near Fort 

Carson, Colorado, unless each of the following occurs: 

(1) The land acquisition is specifically authorized in an 

Act of Congress enacted after the date of the enactment of 

this Act. 

(2) Funds are specifically appropriated for the land acquisition. 

(3) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the 

Army comply with the environmental review requirements of 

section 102(2) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 

1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)) with respect to the land acquisition. 

Subtitle C—Provisions Related to AsiaPacific Military Realignment 

SEC. 2821. CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR TO PREVIOUS 

FISCAL YEAR FOR PERIOD COVERED BY ANNUAL REPORT 

OF INTERAGENCY COORDINATION GROUP OF INSPECTORS GENERAL FOR GUAM REALIGNMENT. 

Section 2835(e)(1) of the Military Construction Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2687 

note) is amended in the first sentence by striking ‘‘calendar year’’ 

and inserting ‘‘fiscal year’’. 
H. R. 3304—345 

SEC. 2822. REALIGNMENT OF MARINES CORPS FORCES IN ASIAPACIFIC REGION. 

(a) RESTRICTION ON USE OF FUNDS.—Except as provided in 

subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated 

under this Act, and none of the amounts provided by the Government of Japan for construction activities on land under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense, may be obligated to implement 

the realignment of Marine Corps forces from Okinawa to Guam 

or Hawaii until the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees each of the following: 

(1) The report required by section 1068(c) of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 

112–239; 126 Stat. 1945). 

(2) Master plans for the construction of facilities and infrastructure to execute the Marine Corps distributed lay-down 

on Guam and Hawaii, including a detailed description of costs 

and the schedule for such construction. 

(3) A plan, coordinated by all pertinent Federal agencies, 

detailing descriptions of work, costs, and a schedule for completion of construction, improvements, and repairs to the nonmilitary utilities, facilities, and infrastructure, if any, on Guam 

affected by the realignment of forces. 

(b) EXCEPTIONS TO RESTRICTION ON USE OF FUNDS.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may use funds 

described in such subsection for the following purposes: 

(1) To complete additional analysis or studies required 

under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 

4321 et seq.) for proposed actions on Guam or Hawaii. 

(2) To initiate planning and design of construction projects 

on Guam. 

(3) To carry out any military construction project for which 

an authorization of appropriations is provided in section 2204, 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

(4) To carry out the construction of a utility and site 

improvement project to support the North Ramp expansion 

at Andersen Air Force Base. 

(c) RESTRICTION ON DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUC- TURE.—If the Secretary of Defense determines that any grant, 

cooperative agreement, transfer of funds to another Federal agency, 

or supplement of funds available in fiscal year 2014 under Federal 

programs administered by agencies other than the Department 

of Defense will result in the development (including repair, replacement, renovation, conversion, improvement, expansion, acquisition, 

or construction) of public infrastructure on Guam, the Secretary 

of Defense may not carry out such grant, transfer, cooperative 

agreement, or supplemental funding unless such grant, transfer, 

cooperative agreement, or supplemental funding is specifically 

authorized by law. 

(d) ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION OF

ADDITIONAL GUAM PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING SOURCES.— 

(1) CONVENING OF COMMITTEE.—Not later than 90 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

of Defense, as the chairperson of the Economic Adjustment 

Committee established in Executive Order No. 127887 (10 

U.S.C. 2391 note), shall convene the Economic Adjustment Committee to consider assistance, including assistance to support 

public infrastructure requirements, necessary to support the 
H. R. 3304—346 

preferred alternative for the relocation of Marine Corps forces 

to Guam. 

(2) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than the date on which 

the Record of Decision for the relocation of Marine Corps forces 

to Guam associated with the ‘‘Guam and CNMI Military Relocation (2012 Roadmap Adjustments) Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement’’ is issued, the Secretary of Defense 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report— 

(A) describing the results of the Economic Adjustment 

Committee deliberations required by paragraph (1); and 

(B) containing an implementation plan to support the 

preferred alternative for the relocation of Marine Corps 

forces to Guam. 

(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) DISTRIBUTED LAY-DOWN.—The term ‘‘distributed laydown’’ refers to the planned distribution of members of the 

Marine Corps in Okinawa, Guam, Hawaii, Australia, and possibly elsewhere that is contemplated in support of the joint 

statement of the United States–Japan Security Consultative 

Committee issued April 26, 2012, in the District of Columbia 

(April 27, 2012, in Tokyo, Japan) and revised on October 3, 

2013, in Tokyo. 

(2) MASTER PLAN.—The term ‘‘master plan’’ means documentation that provides the scope, cost, and schedule for each 

military construction project. 

(3) PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE.—The term ‘‘public infrastructure’’ means any utility, method of transportation, item of 

equipment, or facility under the control of a public entity or 

State or local government that is used by, or constructed for 

the benefit of, the general public. 

(f) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED LAW.—Section 2832 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B 

of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2155) is repealed. 

Subtitle D—Land Conveyances 

SEC. 2831. REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION, NAVAL BASE VENTURA 

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of the Navy may acquire all 

right, title, and interest in and to real property, including improvements thereon, located at Naval Base Ventura County, California, 

that was initially constructed under the former section 2828(g) 

of title 10, United States Code (commonly known as the ‘‘Build 

to Lease program’’), as added by section 801 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act, 1984 (Public Law 98–115; 97 Stat 

782). 

(b) USE.—Upon acquiring the real property under subsection 

(a), the Secretary of the Navy may use the improvements as provided in sections 2835 and 2835a of title 10, United States Code. 

SEC. 2832. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER OXNARD AIR FORCE BASE, 

VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 

(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Navy may 

convey, without consideration, to Ventura County, California (in 

this section referred to as the ‘‘County’’), all right, title, and interest 

of the United States in and to the real property, including any 
H. R. 3304—347 

improvements thereon, consisting of former Oxnard Air Force Base 

for the purpose of permitting the County to use the property for 

public purposes. 

(b) CONDITION ON USE OF REVENUES.—If the property conveyed 

under subsection (a) is used, consistent with such subsection, for 

a public purpose that results in the generation of revenue for 

the County, the County shall agree to use the generated revenue 

only for airport purposes by depositing the revenues in an airport 

fund designated for airport use. 

(c) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— (1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Navy shall 

require the County to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred 

by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection 

(a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the County in advance 

of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount 

collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary 

to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the 

excess amount to the County. 

(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received 

as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to 

the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred 

by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts 

so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or 

account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and 

subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts 

in such fund or account. 

(d) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal 

description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) 

shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of 

the Navy. 

(e) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—If the Secretary of the Navy 

determines at any time that the real property conveyed under 

subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with the purpose 

of the conveyance specified in subsection (a) or that the County 

has violated the condition on the use of revenues imposed by subsection (b), all right, title, and interest in and to such real property, 

including any improvements thereto, shall, at the option of the 

Secretary, revert to and become the property of the United States, 

and the United States shall have the right of immediate entry 

onto such real property. A determination by the Secretary under 

this subsection shall be made on the record after an opportunity 

for a hearing. 

(f) ADDITIONAL TERMS.—The Secretary of the Navy may require 

such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests 

of the United States. 

SEC. 2833. LAND CONVEYANCE, JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, 

HAWAII. 

(a) CONVEYANCES AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Navy 

may convey to the Hale Keiki School all right, title, and interest 

of the United States, or any portion thereof, in and to certain 

real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of 

approximately 11 acres located at or in the nearby vicinity of 
H. R. 3304—348 

153 Bougainville Drive, Honolulu, Hawaii (City and County of Honolulu Tax Map Key No. 9–9–02:37), which is part of the Joint 

Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, before such real property, or any portion 

thereof, is made available for transfer pursuant to the Hawaiian 

Home Lands Recovery Act (title II of Public Law 104–42; 109 

Stat. 357), for use by any other Federal agency, or for disposal 

under applicable laws. 

(b) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for a conveyance under 

subsection (a), the Hale Keiki School shall provide the United 

States, whether by cash payment, in-kind consideration described 

in section 2667(c) of title 10, United States Code, or a combination 

thereof, an amount that is not less than the fair market value 

of the conveyed property, as determined pursuant to an appraisal 

acceptable to the Secretary. 

(c) EXERCISE OF RIGHT TO PURCHASE PROPERTY.— 

(1) ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER.—For a period of 180 days beginning on the date the Secretary makes a written offer to convey 

the property or any portion thereof under subsection (a), the 

Hale Keiki School shall have the exclusive right to accept 

such offer by providing written notice of acceptance to the 

Secretary within the specified 180-day time period. If the Secretary’s offer is not so accepted within the 180-day period, 

the offer shall expire. 

(2) CONVEYANCE DEADLINE.—If the Hale Keiki School 

accepts the offer to convey the property or a portion thereof 

in accordance with paragraph (1), the conveyance shall take 

place not later than two years after the date of the Hale 

Keiki School’s written acceptance. The Secretary and the Hale 

Keiki School, by mutual agreement, may extend the two-year 

conveyance deadline for a reasonable period of time, as evidenced by a new lease or license executed by the parties before 

the deadline. 

(d) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCES.— (1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary shall require the 

Hale Keiki School to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, 

or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out a conveyance under subsection (a), including 

survey costs, related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected 

from the Hale Keiki School in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the 

costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the 

Hale Keiki School. The Secretary may collect the costs from 

the Hale Keiki School in advance of incurring any costs and 

may pay the administrative costs of processing the conveyance 

as they are incurred or at any time thereafter. 

(2) ASSUMPTION OF RISK OF PAYING COSTS OF CONVEY- ANCE.—In the event that the conveyance is not completed by 

the deadline set forth in subsection (c)(2), including any extension thereof, the amounts collected from the Hale Keiki School 

under paragraph (1) will not be refunded or reimbursed. The 

Hale Keiki School shall be considered to have assumed the 

risk of paying all costs of processing the conveyance after 

the offer has been accepted by the Hale Keiki School, regardless 

of whether or not the conveyance is ever completed. 

(3) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received 

under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for costs incurred by 
H. R. 3304—349 

the Secretary to carry out a conveyance under subsection (a) 

shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to 

cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the 

conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts 

in such fund or account and shall be available for the same 

purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, 

as amounts in such fund or account. 

(e) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal 

description of any real property to be conveyed under subsection 

(a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. 

(f) ADDITIONAL TERM AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary may 

require such additional terms and conditions in connection with 

a conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 

SEC. 2834. LAND CONVEYANCE, PHILADELPHIA NAVAL SHIPYARD, 

PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA. 

(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Navy may 

convey to the Philadelphia Regional Port Authority (in this section 

referred to as the ‘‘Port Authority’’) all right, title, and interest 

of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including 

any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately .595 acres 

located at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Secretary may void any land use restrictions associated 

with the property to be conveyed under this subsection. 

(b) CONSIDERATION.— 

(1) AMOUNT AND DETERMINATION.—As consideration for the 

conveyance under subsection (a), the Port Authority shall pay 

to the Secretary of the Navy an amount that is not less than 

the fair market value of the property conveyed, as determined 

by the Secretary. The Secretary’s determination of fair market 

value shall be final. In lieu of all or a portion of cash payment 

of consideration, the Secretary may accept in-kind consideration. 

(2) TREATMENT OF CASH CONSIDERATION.—The Secretary 

shall deposit any cash payment received under paragraph (1) 

in the special account in the Treasury established for that 

Secretary under subsection (e) of section 2667 of title 10, United 

States Code. The entire amount deposited shall be available 

for use in accordance with paragraph (1)(D) of such subsection. 

(c) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— 

(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Navy shall 

require the Port Authority to cover costs to be incurred by 

the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred 

by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection 

(a), including survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the 

conveyance. If amounts are collected in advance of the Secretary 

incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds 

the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the 

conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to 

the Port Authority. 

(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received 

as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to 

the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred 

by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts 

so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or 
H. R. 3304—350 

account and shall be available for the same purposes, and 

subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts 

in such fund or account. 

(d) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal 

description of the parcel of real property to be conveyed under 

subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the 

Secretary of the Navy. 

(e) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary of the 

Navy may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary 

considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 

SEC. 2835. LAND CONVEYANCE, CAMP WILLIAMS, UTAH. 

(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Interior, 

acting through the Bureau of Land Management, may convey, without consideration, to the State of Utah all right, title, and interest 

of the United States in and to certain lands comprising approximately 420 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled ‘‘Proposed 

Camp Williams Land Transfer’’ and dated June 14, 2011, which 

are located within the boundaries of the public lands currently 

withdrawn for military use by the Utah National Guard and known 

as Camp Williams, Utah, for the purpose of permitting the Utah 

National Guard to use the conveyed land for military purposes. 

(b) SUPERSEDENCE OF EXECUTIVE ORDER.—Executive Order No. 

1922 of April 24, 1914, as amended by section 907 of the Camp 

W.G. Williams Land Exchange Act of 1989 (title IX of Public Law 

101–628; 104 Stat. 4501), is hereby superseded, only insofar as 

it affects the lands conveyed to the State of Utah under subsection 

(a). 

(c) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—If the Secretary of the Army, 

in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, determines at 

any time that the lands conveyed under subsection (a), or any 

portion thereof, are sold or attempted to be sold, or that the lands, 

or any portion thereof, are not being used in a manner consistent 

with the purpose of the conveyance specified in such subsection, 

all right, title, and interest in and to the lands shall, at the option 

of the Secretary of the Army, in consultation with the Secretary 

of the Interior, revert to and become the property of the United 

States, and the United States shall have the right of immediate 

entry onto the lands. A determination under this subsection shall 

be made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing. 

(d) ADDITIONAL TERMS.—The Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Secretary of the Army, may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under 

subsection (a) as the Secretary of the Interior considers appropriate 

to protect the interests of the United States. 

SEC. 2836. CONVEYANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD RADAR SITE, FRANCIS 

PEAK, WASATCH MOUNTAINS, UTAH. 

(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Air Force 

may convey, without consideration, to the State of Utah (in this 

section referred to as the ‘‘State’’), all right, title, and interest 

of the United States in and to the structures, including equipment 

and any other personal property related thereto, comprising the 

Air National Guard radar site located on Francis Peak, Utah, 

for the purpose of permitting the State to use the structures to 

support emergency public safety communications, including 911 

emergency response service for Northern Utah. 
H. R. 3304—351 

(b) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— 

(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Air Force 

may require the State to cover costs to be incurred by the 

Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred 

by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection 

(a), including survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, and other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts paid to the Secretary in advance exceed the 

costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the 

State. 

(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received 

as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to 

the fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred 

by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts 

so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or 

account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and 

subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts 

in such fund or account. 

(c) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact inventory of equipment and other personal property to be conveyed under subsection 

(a) shall be determined by the Secretary of the Air Force. 

(d) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary of the 

Air Force may require such additional terms and conditions in 

connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United 

States. 

(e) CONTINUATION OF LAND USE PERMIT.—The conveyance of 

the structures under subsection (a) shall not affect the validity 

and continued applicability of the land use permit, in effect on 

the date of the enactment of this Act, that was issued by the 

Forest Service for placement and use of the structures. 

(f) DURATION OF AUTHORITY.—The authority to make a conveyance under this section shall expire on the later of— 

(1) September 30, 2014; or 

(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 

for military construction for fiscal year 2015. 

SEC. 2837. LAND CONVEYANCES, FORMER UNITED STATES ARMY 

RESERVE CENTERS, CONNECTICUT, NEW HAMPSHIRE, 

AND PENNSYLVANIA. 

(a) CONVEYANCES AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Army 

may convey, without consideration, all right, title, and interest 

of the United States in and to the parcels of real property described 

in paragraphs (1) through (4), including any improvements thereon 

and easements related thereto, to the entity specified in such a 

paragraph for the corresponding parcel and for the purposes specified in such paragraph: 

(1) Approximately 5.11 acres and improvements known 

as the LT John S. Turner Army Reserve Center in Fairfield, 

Connecticut, to the City of Fairfield, Connecticut, for the public 

benefit of a public park or recreational use. 

(2) Approximately 6.9 acres and improvements known as 

the Paul J. Sutcovoy Army Reserve Center in Waterbury, Connecticut, to the City of Waterbury, Connecticut, for the public 

benefit of emergency services and public safety activities. 
H. R. 3304—352 

(3) Approximately 3.4 acres and improvements known as 

the Paul A. Doble Army Reserve Center in Portsmouth, New 

Hampshire, to the City of Portsmouth, New Hampshire, for 

the public benefit of a public park or recreational use. 

(4) Approximately 4.52 acres and containing the Mifflin 

County Army Reserve Center located at 73 Reserve Lane, 

Lewistown, Pennsylvania (parcel number 16,01–0113J) to Derry 

Township, Pennsylvania for a regional police headquarters or 

other purposes of public benefit. 

(b) TERMS APPLICABLE TO MIFFLIN COUNTY ARMY RESERVE

CENTER CONVEYANCE.— (1) INTERIM LEASE.—Until such time as the real property 

described in subsection (a)(4) is conveyed to Derry Township, 

Pennsylvania, the Secretary of the Army may lease the property 

to the Township. 

(2) CONDITIONS OF CONVEYANCE.—The conveyance of the 

real property under subsection (a)(4) shall be subject to the 

condition that Derry Township, Pennsylvania, not use any Federal funds to cover— 

(A) any portion of the conveyance costs required by 

subsection (d) to be paid by the Township; or 

(B) to cover the costs for the design or construction 

of any facility on the property. 

(c) REVERSION; EXCEPTION.— 

(1) REVERSION.—The deed of conveyance for a parcel of 

real property conveyed under this section shall provide that 

all of the property be used and maintained for the purpose 

for which it was conveyed, as specified in subsection (a). If 

the Secretary of the Army determines at any time that the 

real property is no longer used or maintained in accordance 

with the purpose of the conveyance, all right, title, and interest 

in and to the property shall revert, at the option of the Secretary, to the United States, and the United States shall have 

the right of immediate entry onto the property. Any determination of the Secretary under this paragraph shall be made on 

the record after an opportunity for hearing. 

(2) PAYMENT OF CONSIDERATION IN LIEU OF REVERSION.— In lieu of exercising the right of reversion retained under paragraph (1) with respect to a parcel of real property conveyed 

under this section, the Secretary may require the recipient 

of the property to pay to the United States an amount equal 

to the fair market value of the property conveyed. The fair 

market value of the property shall be determined by the Secretary. 

(3) TREATMENT OF CASH CONSIDERATION.—Any cash payment received by the United States under paragraph (2) shall 

be deposited in the special account in the Treasury established 

under subsection (b) of section 572 of title 40, United States 

Code, and shall be available in accordance with paragraph 

(5)(B) of such subsection. 

(d) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— (1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Army shall 

require the recipient of a parcel of real property conveyed 

under this section to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, 

or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the 

Secretary, to carry out the conveyance of the property, including 

survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any 
H. R. 3304—353 

other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts 

are collected from the recipient of the property in advance 

of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount 

collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary 

to carry out the conveyance of the property, the Secretary 

shall refund the excess amount to the recipient of the property. 

(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received 

as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to 

the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred 

by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyances under this 

section. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts 

in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same 

purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, 

as amounts in such fund or account. 

(e) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES.—The exact acreage and legal 

description of a parcel of real property to be conveyed under this 

section shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary 

of the Army. 

(f) ADDITIONAL TERMS.—The Secretary of the Army may require 

such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance of a parcel of real property under this section as the Secretary 

considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

SEC. 2841. REPEAL OF ANNUAL ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT COMMITTEE 

REPORTING REQUIREMENT. 

Subsection (d) of section 4004 of the Defense Economic Adjustment, Diversification, Conversion, and Stabilization Act of 1990 

(division D of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2391 note), as 

amended by section 4212(b) of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–484; 106 Stat. 2664), 

is further amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (1); 

(2) by striking ‘‘; and’’ at the end of paragraph (2) and 

inserting a period; and 

(3) by striking paragraph (3). 

SEC. 2842. ESTABLISHMENT OF MILITARY DIVERS MEMORIAL. 

(a) MEMORIAL AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Navy may 

permit a third party to establish and maintain a memorial to 

honor the members of the United States Armed Forces who have 

served as divers and whose service in defense of the United States 

has been carried out beneath the waters of the world. 

(b) USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS PROHIBITED.—Federal funds may 

not be used to design, procure, prepare, install, or maintain the 

memorial authorized by subsection (a), but the Secretary may accept 

and expend contributions of non-Federal funds and resources for 

such purposes. 

(c) LOCATION OF MEMORIAL.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Consistent with the sense of the Congress 

expressed in section 2855 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2162), 

the Secretary may permit the memorial authorized by subsection (a) to be established— 
H. R. 3304—354 

(A) at a suitable location at the former Navy Dive 

School at the Washington Navy Yard in the District of 

Columbia; or 

(B) at another suitable location under the jurisdiction 

of the Secretary. 

(2) CONDITION.—The memorial authorized by subsection 

(a) may not be established at any location under the jurisdiction 

of the Secretary until the Secretary determines that an assured 

source of non-Federal funding has been established for the 

design, procurement, installation, and maintenance of the 

memorial. 

(d) DESIGN OF MEMORIAL.—The final design of the memorial 

authorized by subsection (a) shall be subject to the approval of 

the Secretary. 

TITLE XXIX—WITHDRAWAL, RESERVATION, AND TRANSFER OF PUBLIC 

LANDS TO SUPPORT MILITARY READINESS AND SECURITY 

Sec. 2901. Short title. 

Sec. 2902. Definitions. 

Subtitle A—General Provisions 

Sec. 2911. General applicability; definitions. 

Sec. 2912. Maps and legal descriptions. 

Sec. 2913. Access restrictions. 

Sec. 2914. Changes in use. 

Sec. 2915. Brush and range fire prevention and suppression. 

Sec. 2916. Ongoing decontamination. 

Sec. 2917. Water rights. 

Sec. 2918. Hunting, fishing, and trapping. 

Sec. 2919. Limitation on extensions and renewals. 

Sec. 2920. Application for renewal of a withdrawal and reservation. 

Sec. 2921. Limitation on subsequent availability of land for appropriation. 

Sec. 2922. Relinquishment. 

Sec. 2923. Immunity of the United States. 

Subtitle B—Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana 

Sec. 2931. Withdrawal and reservation of public land. 

Sec. 2932. Management of withdrawn and reserved land. 

Sec. 2933. Special rules governing minerals management. 

Sec. 2934. Grazing. 

Sec. 2935. Payments in lieu of taxes. 

Sec. 2936. Duration of withdrawal and reservation. 

Subtitle C—Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California 

Sec. 2941. Withdrawal and reservation of public land. 

Sec. 2942. Management of withdrawn and reserved land. 

Sec. 2943. Public access. 

Sec. 2944. Resource management group. 

Sec. 2945. Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area. 

Sec. 2946. Duration of withdrawal and reservation. 

Subtitle D—White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, and Fort Bliss, Texas 

Sec. 2951. Withdrawal and reservation of public land. 

Sec. 2952. Grazing. 

Subtitle E—Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California 

Sec. 2961. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction of public land. 

Sec. 2962. Management and use of transferred land. 

Sec. 2963. Effect of termination of military use. 
H. R. 3304—355 

Sec. 2964. Temporary extension of existing withdrawal period. 

Sec. 2965. Water rights. 

Sec. 2966. Realignment of range boundary and related transfer of title. 

Subtitle F—Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California 

Sec. 2971. Withdrawal and reservation of public land. 

Sec. 2972. Management of withdrawn and reserved land. 

Sec. 2973. Assignment of management responsibility to Secretary of the Navy. 

Sec. 2974. Geothermal resources. 

Sec. 2975. Wild horses and burros. 

Sec. 2976. Continuation of existing agreement. 

Sec. 2977. Management plans. 

Sec. 2978. Termination of prior withdrawals. 

Sec. 2979. Duration of withdrawal and reservation. 

SEC. 2901. SHORT TITLE. 

This title may be cited as the ‘‘Military Land Withdrawals 

Act of 2013’’. 

SEC. 2902. DEFINITIONS. 

In this title: 

(1) INDIAN TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Indian tribe’’ has the meaning 

given the term in section 102 of the Federally Recognized 

Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 479a). 

(2) MANAGE; MANAGEMENT.— 

(A) INCLUSIONS.—The terms ‘‘manage’’ and ‘‘management’’ include the authority to exercise jurisdiction, custody, and control over the land withdrawn and reserved 

by this title. 

(B) EXCLUSIONS.—The terms ‘‘manage’’ and ‘‘management’’ do not include authority for disposal of the land 

withdrawn and reserved by this title. 

(3) SECRETARY CONCERNED.—The term ‘‘Secretary concerned’’ has the meaning given the term in section 101(a) 

of title 10, United States Code. 

Subtitle A—General Provisions 

SEC. 2911. GENERAL APPLICABILITY; DEFINITIONS. 

(a) APPLICABILITY.—This subtitle applies to each land withdrawal and reservation made by this title. 

(b) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this title assigns 

management of real property under the administrative jurisdiction 

of the Secretary concerned to the Secretary of the Interior. 

SEC. 2912. MAPS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS. 

(a) PREPARATION OF MAPS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS.—As soon 

as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

of the Interior shall— 

(1) publish in the Federal Register a notice containing 

the legal descriptions of the land withdrawn and reserved by 

this title; and 

(2) file maps and legal descriptions of the land withdrawn 

and reserved by this title with— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate; 

and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives. 
H. R. 3304—356 

(b) LEGAL EFFECT.—The maps and legal descriptions filed under 

subsection (a)(2) shall have the same force and effect as if the 

maps and legal descriptions were included in this title, except 

that the Secretary of the Interior may correct any clerical and 

typographical errors in the maps and legal descriptions. 

(c) AVAILABILITY.—Copies of the maps and legal descriptions 

filed under subsection (a)(2) shall be available for public inspection— 

(1) in the appropriate offices of the Bureau of Land Management; 

(2) in the office of the commanding officer of the military 

installation for which the land is withdrawn; and 

(3) if the military installation is under the management 

of the National Guard, in the office of the Adjutant General 

of the State in which the military installation is located. 

(d) COSTS.—The Secretary concerned shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for the costs incurred by the Secretary of 

the Interior in implementing this section. 

SEC. 2913. ACCESS RESTRICTIONS. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE RESTRICTIONS.—If the Secretary concerned determines that military operations, public safety, or 

national security require the closure to the public of any road, 

trail, or other portion of land withdrawn and reserved by this 

title, the Secretary may take such action as the Secretary determines to be necessary to implement and maintain the closure. 

(b) LIMITATION.—Any closure under subsection (a) shall be limited to the minimum area and duration that the Secretary concerned 

determines are required for the purposes of the closure. 

(c) CONSULTATION REQUIRED.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (3), before a closure 

is implemented under this section, the Secretary concerned 

shall consult with the Secretary of the Interior. 

(2) INDIAN TRIBE.—Subject to paragraph (3), if a closure 

proposed under this section may affect access to or use of 

sacred sites or resources considered to be important by an 

Indian tribe, the Secretary concerned shall consult, at the earliest practicable date, with the affected Indian tribe. 

(3) LIMITATION.—No consultation shall be required under 

paragraph (1) or (2)— 

(A) if the closure is provided for in an integrated natural resources management plan, an installation cultural 

resources management plan, or a land use management 

plan; or 

(B) in the case of an emergency, as determined by 

the Secretary concerned. 

(d) NOTICE.—Immediately preceding and during any closure 

implemented under subsection (a), the Secretary concerned shall 

post appropriate warning notices and take other appropriate actions 

to notify the public of the closure. 

SEC. 2914. CHANGES IN USE. 

(a) OTHER USES AUTHORIZED.—In addition to the purposes 

described in a subtitle of this title applicable to the land withdrawal 

and reservation made by that subtitle, the Secretary concerned 

may authorize the use of land withdrawn and reserved by this 

title for defense-related purposes. 

(b) NOTICE TO SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.— 
H. R. 3304—357 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary concerned shall promptly 

notify the Secretary of the Interior if the land withdrawn and 

reserved by this title is used for additional defense-related 

purposes. 

(2) REQUIREMENTS.—A notification under paragraph (1) 

shall specify— 

(A) each additional use; 

(B) the planned duration of each additional use; and 

(C) the extent to which each additional use would 

require that additional or more stringent conditions or 

restrictions be imposed on otherwise-permitted nondefenserelated uses of the withdrawn and reserved land or portions 

of withdrawn and reserved land. 

SEC. 2915. BRUSH AND RANGE FIRE PREVENTION AND SUPPRESSION. 

(a) REQUIRED ACTIVITIES.—Consistent with any applicable land 

management plan, the Secretary concerned shall take necessary 

precautions to prevent, and actions to suppress, brush and range 

fires occurring as a result of military activities on the land withdrawn and reserved by this title, including fires that occur on 

other land that spread from the withdrawn and reserved land. 

(b) COOPERATION OF SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—At the request of the Secretary concerned, 

the Secretary of the Interior shall provide assistance in the 

suppression of fires under subsection (a). The Secretary concerned shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for the 

costs incurred by the Secretary of the Interior in providing 

such assistance. 

(2) TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Notwithstanding section 2215 

of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary concerned may 

transfer to the Secretary of the Interior, in advance, funds 

to be used to reimburse the costs of the Department of the 

Interior in providing assistance under this subsection. 

SEC. 2916. ONGOING DECONTAMINATION. 

(a) PROGRAM OF DECONTAMINATION REQUIRED.—During the 

period of a withdrawal and reservation of land under this title, 

the Secretary concerned shall maintain, to the extent funds are 

available to carry out this subsection, a program of decontamination 

of contamination caused by defense-related uses on the withdrawn 

land. The decontamination program shall be carried out consistent 

with applicable Federal and State law. 

(b) ANNUAL REPORT.—The Secretary of Defense shall include 

in the annual report required by section 2711 of title 10, United 

States Code, a description of decontamination activities conducted 

under subsection (a). 

SEC. 2917. WATER RIGHTS. 

(a) NO RESERVATION OF WATER RIGHTS.—Nothing in this title— 

(1) establishes a reservation in favor of the United States 

with respect to any water or water right on the land withdrawn 

and reserved by this title; or 

(2) authorizes the appropriation of water on the land withdrawn and reserved by this title, except in accordance with 

applicable State law. 

(b) EFFECT ON PREVIOUSLY ACQUIRED OR RESERVED WATER

RIGHTS.— 
H. R. 3304—358 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this section affects any water 

rights acquired or reserved by the United States before the 

date of enactment of this Act on the land withdrawn and 

reserved by this title. 

(2) AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY CONCERNED.—The Secretary 

concerned may exercise any water rights described in paragraph 

(1). 

SEC. 2918. HUNTING, FISHING, AND TRAPPING. 

Section 2671 of title 10, United States Code, shall apply to 

all hunting, fishing, and trapping on the land— 

(1) that is withdrawn and reserved by this title; and 

(2) for which management of the land has been assigned 

to the Secretary concerned. 

SEC. 2919. LIMITATION ON EXTENSIONS AND RENEWALS. 

The withdrawals and reservations established under this title 

may not be extended or renewed except by a law enacted after 

the date of enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 2920. APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF A WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION. 

To the extent practicable, not later than five years before the 

date of termination of a withdrawal and reservation made by a 

subtitle of this title, the Secretary concerned shall— 

(1) notify the Secretary of the Interior as to whether the 

Secretary concerned will have a continuing defense-related need 

for any of the land withdrawn and reserved by that subtitle 

after the termination date of the withdrawal and reservation; 

and 

(2) transmit a copy of the notice submitted under paragraph 

(1) to— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate; 

and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 2921. LIMITATION ON SUBSEQUENT AVAILABILITY OF LAND FOR 

APPROPRIATION. 

On the termination of a withdrawal and reservation made 

by this title, the previously withdrawn land shall not be open 

to any form of appropriation under the public land laws, including 

the mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the geothermal 

leasing laws, unless the Secretary of the Interior publishes in 

the Federal Register an appropriate order specifying the date on 

which the land shall be— 

(1) restored to the public domain; and 

(2) opened for appropriation under the public land laws. 

SEC. 2922. RELINQUISHMENT. 

(a) NOTICE OF INTENTION TO RELINQUISH.—If, during the period 

of withdrawal and reservation made by a subtitle of this title, 

the Secretary concerned decides to relinquish any or all of the 

land withdrawn and reserved by that subtitle, the Secretary concerned shall submit to the Secretary of the Interior notice of the 

intention to relinquish the land. 
H. R. 3304—359 

(b) DETERMINATION OF CONTAMINATION.—The Secretary concerned shall include in the notice submitted under subsection (a) 

a written determination concerning whether and to what extent 

the land that is to be relinquished is contaminated with explosive 

materials or toxic or hazardous substances. 

(c) PUBLIC NOTICE.—The Secretary of the Interior shall publish 

in the Federal Register the notice of intention to relinquish the 

land under this section, including the determination concerning 

the contaminated state of the land. 

(d) DECONTAMINATION OF LAND TO BE RELINQUISHED.— (1) DECONTAMINATION REQUIRED.—The Secretary concerned 

shall decontaminate land subject to a notice of intention under 

subsection (a) to the extent that funds are appropriated for 

that purpose, if— 

(A) the land subject to the notice of intention is 

contaminated, as determined by the Secretary concerned; 

and 

(B) the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with 

the Secretary concerned, determines that— 

(i) decontamination is practicable and economically 

feasible, after taking into consideration the potential 

future use and value of the contaminated land; and 

(ii) on decontamination of the land, the land could 

be opened to operation of some or all of the public 

land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral 

leasing laws, and the geothermal leasing laws. 

(2) ALTERNATIVES TO RELINQUISHMENT.—The Secretary of 

the Interior shall not be required to accept the land proposed 

for relinquishment under subsection (a), if— 

(A) the Secretary of the Interior, after consultation 

with the Secretary concerned, determines that— 

(i) decontamination of the land is not practicable 

or economically feasible; or 

(ii) the land cannot be decontaminated sufficiently 

to be opened to operation of some or all of the public 

land laws; or 

(B) sufficient funds are not appropriated for the decontamination of the land. 

(3) STATUS OF CONTAMINATED LAND ON TERMINATION.— 

If, because of the contaminated state of the land, the Secretary 

of the Interior declines to accept land withdrawn and reserved 

by this title that has been proposed for relinquishment, or 

if at the expiration of the withdrawal and reservation, the 

Secretary of the Interior determines that a portion of the land 

withdrawn and reserved is contaminated to an extent that 

prevents opening the contaminated land to operation of the 

public land laws— 

(A) the Secretary concerned shall take appropriate 

steps to warn the public of— 

(i) the contaminated state of the land; and 

(ii) any risks associated with entry onto the land; 

(B) after the expiration of the withdrawal and reservation, the Secretary concerned shall undertake no activities 

on the contaminated land, except for activities relating 

to the decontamination of the land; and 

(C) the Secretary concerned shall submit to the Secretary of the Interior and Congress a report describing— 
H. R. 3304—360 

(i) the status of the land; and 

(ii) any actions taken under this paragraph. 

(e) REVOCATION AUTHORITY.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of the Interior determines 

that it is in the public interest to accept the land proposed 

for relinquishment under subsection (a), the Secretary of the 

Interior may order the revocation of a withdrawal and reservation made by this title. 

(2) REVOCATION ORDER.—To carry out a revocation under 

paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in 

the Federal Register a revocation order that— 

(A) terminates the withdrawal and reservation; 

(B) constitutes official acceptance of the land by the 

Secretary of the Interior; and 

(C) specifies the date on which the land will be opened 

to the operation of some or all of the public land laws, 

including the mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, and 

the geothermal leasing laws. 

(f) ACCEPTANCE BY SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this section requires the Secretary of the Interior to accept the land proposed for relinquishment if the Secretary determines that the land is not suitable 

for return to the public domain. 

(2) NOTICE.—If the Secretary makes a determination that 

the land is not suitable for return to the public domain, the 

Secretary shall provide notice of the determination to Congress. 

SEC. 2923. IMMUNITY OF THE UNITED STATES. 

The United States and officers and employees of the United 

States shall be held harmless and shall not be liable for any 

injuries or damages to persons or property incurred as a result 

of any mining or mineral or geothermal leasing activity or other 

authorized nondefense-related activity conducted on land withdrawn 

and reserved by this title. 

Subtitle B—Limestone Hills Training Area, 

Montana 

SEC. 2931. WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC LAND. 

(a) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights and except 

as otherwise provided in this subtitle, the public land (including 

interests in land) described in subsection (b), and all other areas 

within the boundaries of the land as depicted on the map referred 

to in such subsection that may become subject to the operation 

of the public land laws, is withdrawn from all forms of appropriation 

under the public land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral 

leasing laws, and the geothermal leasing laws. 

(b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The public land (including interests 

in land) referred to in subsection (a) is the Federal land comprising 

approximately 18,644 acres in Broadwater County, Montana, generally depicted as ‘‘Proposed Land Withdrawal’’ on the map entitled 

‘‘Limestone Hills Training Area Land Withdrawal’’, dated April 

10, 2013, and filed in accordance with section 2912. 

(c) RESERVATION; PURPOSE.—Subject to the limitations and 

restrictions contained in section 2933, the public land withdrawn 
H. R. 3304—361 

by subsection (a) is reserved for use by the Secretary of the Army 

for the following purposes: 

(1) The conduct of training for active and reserve components of the Armed Forces. 

(2) The construction, operation, and maintenance of 

organizational support and maintenance facilities for component units conducting training. 

(3) The conduct of training by the Montana Department 

of Military Affairs, provided that the training does not interfere 

with the purposes specified in paragraphs (1) and (2). 

(4) The conduct of training by State and local law enforcement agencies, civil defense organizations, and public education 

institutions, provided that the training does not interfere with 

the purposes specified in paragraphs (1) and (2). 

(5) Other defense-related purposes consistent with the preceding purposes. 

(d) INDIAN TRIBES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this subtitle alters any rights 

reserved for an Indian tribe for tribal use of the public land 

withdrawn by subsection (a) by treaty or Federal law. 

(2) CONSULTATION REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Army 

shall consult with any Indian tribes in the vicinity of the 

public land withdrawn by subsection (a) before taking any 

action within the public land affecting tribal rights or cultural 

resources protected by treaty or Federal law. 

SEC. 2932. MANAGEMENT OF WITHDRAWN AND RESERVED LAND. 

During the period of the withdrawal and reservation of land 

made by section 2931, the Secretary of the Army shall manage 

the land withdrawn and reserved by such section for the purposes 

described in subsection (c) of such section— 

(1) subject to the limitations and restrictions contained 

in section 2933; and 

(2) in accordance with— 

(A) an integrated natural resources management plan 

prepared and implemented under title I of the Sikes Act 

(16 U.S.C. 670a et seq.); 

(B) subtitle A and this subtitle; and 

(C) other applicable law. 

SEC. 2933. SPECIAL RULES GOVERNING MINERALS MANAGEMENT. 

(a) INDIAN CREEK MINE.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Of the land withdrawn by section 2931, 

locatable mineral activities in the approved Indian Creek Mine 

plan of operations, MTM–78300, shall be regulated in accordance with subparts 3715 and 3809 of title 43, Code of Federal 

Regulations. 

(2) RESTRICTIONS ON SECRETARY OF THE ARMY.— (A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army shall 

make no determination that the disposition of, or exploration for, minerals as provided for in the approved plan 

of operations described in paragraph (1) is inconsistent 

with the defense-related uses of the land withdrawn under 

section 2931. 

(B) COORDINATION.—The coordination of the disposition 

of and exploration for minerals with defense-related uses 

of the land shall be determined in accordance with procedures in an agreement provided for under subsection (c). 
H. R. 3304—362 

(b) REMOVAL OF UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE ON LAND TO BE

MINED.— 

(1) REMOVAL ACTIVITIES.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the availability of funds 

appropriated for such purpose, the Secretary of the Army 

shall remove unexploded ordnance on land withdrawn by 

section 2931 that is subject to mining under subsection 

(a), consistent with applicable Federal and State law. 

(B) PHASES.—The Secretary of the Army may provide 

for the removal of unexploded ordnance in phases to 

accommodate the development of the Indian Creek Mine 

under subsection (a). 

(2) REPORT ON REMOVAL ACTIVITIES.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army shall 

annually submit to the Secretary of the Interior a report 

regarding any unexploded ordnance removal activities conducted during the previous fiscal year in accordance with 

this subsection. 

(B) INCLUSIONS.—The report under this paragraph 

shall include— 

(i) a description of the amounts expended for 

unexploded ordnance removal on the withdrawn land 

during the period covered by the report; and 

(ii) the identification of the land cleared of 

unexploded ordnance and approved for mining activities by the Secretary of the Interior. 

(c) IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT FOR MINING ACTIVITIES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior and the 

Secretary of the Army shall enter into an agreement to implement this section with respect to the coordination of defenserelated uses and mining and the ongoing removal of unexploded 

ordnance. 

(2) DURATION.—The duration of the agreement shall be 

equal to the period of the withdrawal under section 2936, 

but may be amended from time to time. 

(3) REQUIREMENTS.—The agreement shall provide the following: 

(A) That Graymont Western US, Inc., or any successor 

or assign of the approved Indian Creek Mine mining plan 

of operations, MTM–78300, shall be invited to be a party 

to the agreement. 

(B) Provisions regarding the day-to-day joint-use of 

the Limestone Hills Training Area. 

(C) Provisions addressing periods during which military and other authorized uses of the withdrawn land 

will occur. 

(D) Provisions regarding when and where military use 

or training with explosive material will occur. 

(E) Provisions regarding the scheduling of training 

activities conducted within the withdrawn land that restrict 

mining activities. 

(F) Procedures for deconfliction with mining operations, 

including parameters for notification and resolution of 

anticipated changes to the schedule. 

(G) Procedures for access through mining operations 

covered by this section to training areas within the boundaries of the Limestone Hills Training Area. 
H. R. 3304—363 

(H) Procedures for scheduling of the removal of 

unexploded ordnance. 

(d) EXISTING MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT.—Until the date 

on which the agreement under subsection (c) becomes effective, 

the compatible joint use of the land withdrawn and reserved by 

section 2931 shall be governed, to the extent compatible, by the 

terms of the 2005 Memorandum of Agreement among the Montana 

Army National Guard, Graymont Western US, Inc., and the Bureau 

of Land Management. 

SEC. 2934. GRAZING. 

(a) ISSUANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF PERMITS AND LEASES.— The Secretary of the Interior shall manage the issuance and 

administration of grazing permits and leases, including the renewal 

of permits and leases, on the public land withdrawn by section 

2931, consistent with all applicable laws (including regulations) 

and policies of the Secretary of the Interior relating to the permits 

and leases. 

(b) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS.—With respect to any grazing permit 

or lease issued after the date of enactment of this Act for land 

withdrawn by section 2931, the Secretary of the Interior and the 

Secretary of the Army shall jointly establish procedures that— 

(1) are consistent with Department of the Army explosive 

and range safety standards; and 

(2) provide for the safe use of the withdrawn land. 

(c) ASSIGNMENT.—With the agreement of the Secretary of the 

Army, the Secretary of the Interior may assign the authority to 

issue and to administer grazing permits and leases to the Secretary 

of the Army, except that the assignment may not include the 

authority to discontinue grazing on the land withdrawn by section 

2931. 

SEC. 2935. PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES. 

The land withdrawn by section 2931 is deemed to be entitlement land for purposes of chapter 69 of title 31, United States 

Code. 

SEC. 2936. DURATION OF WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION. 

The withdrawal and reservation of public land made by section 

2931 shall terminate on March 31, 2039. 

Subtitle C—Marine Corps Air Ground 

Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California 

SEC. 2941. WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC LAND. 

(a) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights and except 

as otherwise provided in this subtitle, the public land (including 

interests in land) described in subsection (b), and all other areas 

within the boundary of the land depicted on the map described 

in such subsection that may become subject to the operation of 

the public land laws, is withdrawn from all forms of appropriation 

under the public land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral 

leasing laws, and the geothermal leasing laws. 

(b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The public land (including interests 

in land) referred to in subsection (a) is the Federal land comprising 
H. R. 3304—364 

approximately 150,928 acres in San Bernardino County, California, 

generally depicted on the map titled ‘‘MCAGCC 29 Palms Expansion 

Map-Johnson Valley Off Highway Vehicle Recreation Area’’, dated 

December 5, 2013, and filed in accordance with section 2912, which 

is divided into the following two areas: 

(1) The Exclusive Military Use Area (in this subtitle 

referred to as the ‘‘Exclusive Military Use Area’’), consisting 

of the following two areas: 

(A) One area to the west of the Marine Corps Air 

Ground Combat Center, consisting of approximately 78,993 

acres. 

(B) One area south of the Marine Corps Air Ground 

Combat Center, consisting of approximately 18,704 acres. 

(2) The Shared Use Area (in this subtitle referred to as 

the ‘‘Shared Use Area’’), consisting of approximately 53,231 

acres. 

(c) RESERVATION FOR SECRETARY OF THE NAVY; PURPOSES.— 

The Exclusive Military Use Area is reserved for use by the Secretary 

of the Navy for the following purposes: 

(1) Sustained, combined arms, live-fire, and maneuver field 

training for large-scale Marine air ground task forces. 

(2) Individual and unit live-fire training ranges. 

(3) Equipment and tactics development. 

(4) Other defense-related purposes that are— 

(A) consistent with the purposes described in the preceding paragraphs; and 

(B) authorized under section 2914. 

(d) RESERVATION FOR SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR; PURPOSES.— The Shared Use Area is reserved— 

(1) for use by the Secretary of the Navy for the purposes 

described in subsection (c); and 

(2) for use by the Secretary of the Interior for the following 

purposes: 

(A) Public recreation— 

(i) during any period in which the land is not 

being used for military training; and 

(ii) as determined to be suitable for public use. 

(B) Natural resources conservation. 

(e) ADJUSTMENT.—The boundary of the Exclusive Military Use 

Area at Emerson Ridge provided in subsection (b)(1) shall be located 

in such as manner so as to ensure access to the pass northwest 

of the ridge for purposes described in subsection (d). 

SEC. 2942. MANAGEMENT OF WITHDRAWN AND RESERVED LAND. 

(a) MANAGEMENT BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY; CONDITION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection (b), 

during the period of withdrawal and reservation of land made 

by section 2941, the Secretary of the Navy shall manage the 

land withdrawn and reserved by such section for the purposes 

described in subsection (c) of such section in accordance with— 

(A) an integrated natural resources management plan 

prepared and implemented under title I of the Sikes Act 

(16 U.S.C. 670a et seq.); 

(B) subtitle A and this subtitle; 

(C) a programmatic agreement between the Marine 

Corps and the California State Historic Preservation Officer 
H. R. 3304—365 

regarding operation, maintenance, training, and construction at the United States Marine Air Ground Task Force 

Training Command, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat 

Center, Twentynine Palms, California; and 

(D) any other applicable law. 

(2) LIVE-FIRE TRAINING.—The boundary of the Exclusive 

Military Use Area described in section 2941 shall be clearly 

identified before the Exclusive Military Use Area is used for 

any live-fire military training. The Secretary of the Navy shall 

ensure the military boundary is maintained. 

(b) MANAGEMENT BY THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR; EXCEPTION.— 

(1) SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR MANAGEMENT.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), 

during the period of withdrawal and reservation of land 

made by section 2941, the Secretary of the Interior shall 

manage the Shared Use Area. 

(B) APPLICABLE LAW.—During the period of the 

management by the Secretary of the Interior under this 

paragraph, the Secretary of the Interior shall manage the 

Shared Use Area for the purposes described in subsection 

(d) of section 2941 in accordance with— 

(i) the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 

of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and 

(ii) any other applicable law. 

(2) SECRETARY OF THE NAVY MANAGEMENT.— 

(A) EXCEPTION.—Twice a year during the period of 

withdrawal and reservation of land by this section, there 

shall be a 30-day period during which the Secretary of 

the Navy shall— 

(i) manage the Shared Use Area; and 

(ii) exclusively use the Shared Use Area for military training purposes. 

(B) APPLICABLE LAW.—During the period of the 

management by the Secretary of the Navy under this paragraph, the Secretary of the Navy shall manage the Shared 

Use Area for the purposes described in subsection (c) of 

section 2941 in accordance with— 

(i) an integrated natural resources management 

plan prepared and implemented in accordance with 

title I of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et seq.); 

(ii) subtitle A and this subtitle; 

(iii) the programmatic agreement described in subsection (a)(3); and 

(iv) any other applicable law. 

(C) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of the Navy shall prohibit the firing of dud-producing ordnance into the Shared 

Use Area. 

(c) IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior and the 

Secretary of the Navy shall enter into a written agreement 

to implement the management responsibilities of the respective 

Secretaries with respect to the Shared Use Area. 

(2) COMPONENTS.—The agreement entered into under paragraph (1)— 
H. R. 3304—366 

(A) shall be of a duration that is equal to the period 

of the withdrawal and reservation of land under section 

2941; 

(B) may be amended from time to time; 

(C) may provide for the integration of the management 

plans required of the Secretary of the Interior and the 

Secretary of the Navy; 

(D) may provide for delegation, to civilian law enforcement personnel of the Department of the Navy, of the 

authority of the Secretary of the Interior to enforce laws 

relating to protection of natural and cultural resources 

and fish and wildlife; and 

(E) may provide for the Secretary of the Interior and 

the Secretary of the Navy to share resources so as to 

most efficiently and effectively manage the Shared Use 

Area. 

(3) LINKAGE.—The Secretary of the Interior shall ensure 

access is provided between the two non-contiguous Johnson 

Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area parcels described 

in section 2945. 

(d) MILITARY TRAINING.— 

(1) NOT CONDITIONAL.—Military training within the Shared 

Use Area shall not be conditioned on— 

(A) the existence of, or precluded by the lack of, a 

recreation management plan or land use management plan 

for the area developed and implemented by the Secretary 

of the Interior; or 

(B) the existence of any legal or administrative challenge to such a recreation management plan or land use 

plan. 

(2) MANAGEMENT.— 

(A) USE AGREEMENT.—The Secretary of the Interior 

shall enter into an agreement with the Secretary of the 

Navy within one year of the date of the enactment of 

this Act for the exclusive use by the Marine Corps of 

two company objective areas, each measuring approximately 300 meters square (approximately 22 acres), located 

inside the boundaries of the Shared Use Area and totaling 

approximately 44 acres. These areas will be closed to all 

public access for the period of the withdrawal specified 

in section 2946. The purpose of this agreement will be 

to accommodate the construction, maintenance, modification, and use of these areas for the purposes identified 

in section 2941(c). 

(B) RANGE MANAGEMENT.—Small, static, short-range 

explosives may be used in the two company objective areas 

described in subparagraph (A). Explosives that fail to function in the company objective areas will be immediately 

identified and located, training will temporarily halt, and 

on-scene explosive ordnance disposal personnel will render 

the munition safe before training resumes. Existing Marine 

Corps range safety policies and procedures as identified 

in Marine Corps Order 3570.1X will be followed to ensure 

all munitions are rendered safe and the area will again 

be swept after the training exercise by qualified personnel 

to further ensure no hazards remain. 
H. R. 3304—367 

(C) ACCESS.—The Shared Use Area shall be managed 

in a manner that does not compromise the ability of the 

Navy to conduct military training in such area. 

SEC. 2943. PUBLIC ACCESS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 2913, the Exclusive 

Military Use Area shall be closed to all public access unless otherwise authorized by the Secretary of the Navy. 

(b) PUBLIC RECREATIONAL USE.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Shared Use Area shall be open to 

public recreational use during the period in which the area 

is under the management of the Secretary of the Interior, 

if there is a determination by the Secretary of the Navy that 

the area is suitable for public use. 

(2) DETERMINATION.—A determination of suitability under 

paragraph (1) shall not be withheld without a specified reason. 

(c) UTILITIES.—Nothing in this subtitle prohibits the construction, operation, maintenance, inspection, and access to existing 

or future utility facilities located within a utility right of way 

in existence on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 2944. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT GROUP. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior, by agreement, shall establish a Resource 

Management Group for the land withdrawn and reserved by section 

2941 to be comprised of representatives of the Department of the 

Interior and the Department of the Navy. 

(b) DUTIES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Resource Management Group shall— 

(A) develop and implement a public outreach plan to 

inform the public of the land uses changes and safety 

restrictions affecting the land withdrawn and reserved by 

section 2941; and 

(B) advise the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy with respect to the issues associated 

with the multiple uses of the Shared Use Area. 

(2) SITING PROCESS.—The Resource Management Group 

shall determine the location of the company objective areas. 

In siting the two areas, the Resource Management Group will 

seek information from representatives of relevant State agencies, Off Highway Vehicle and other recreation interest groups, 

and environmental advocacy groups. The Resource Management 

Group shall consider potential recreational and conservation 

uses of the area when making their location determination. 

(c) MEETINGS.—The Resource Management Group shall— 

(1) meet at least once a year; and 

(2) solicit input from relevant State agencies, private offhighway vehicle interest groups, event managers, environmental advocacy groups, and others relating to the management 

and facilitation of recreational use within the Shared Use Area. 

SEC. 2945. JOHNSON VALLEY OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE RECREATION 

AREA. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—There is hereby designated the ‘‘Johnson 

Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area’’, consisting of— 

(1) 43,431 acres (as depicted on the map referred to in 

subsection (b) of section 2941) of the existing Bureau of Land 

Management-designated Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle 
H. R. 3304—368 

Area that is not withdrawn and reserved for defense-related 

uses by such section; and 

(2) The Shared Use Area. 

(b) AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES.—To the extent consistent with 

applicable Federal law (including regulations) and this subtitle, 

any authorized recreation activities and use designation in effect 

on the date of enactment of this Act and applicable to the Johnson 

Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area may continue, 

including casual off-highway vehicular use and recreation. 

(c) ADMINISTRATION.—The Secretary of the Interior shall administer the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area 

(other than the Shared Use Area, which is being managed in 

accordance with the other provisions of this subtitle) in accordance 

with— 

(1) the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 

(43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and 

(2) any other applicable law. 

(d) TRANSIT.—In coordination with the Secretary of the Interior, 

the Secretary of the Navy may authorize transit through the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area for defense-related 

purposes supporting military training (including military range 

management and management of exercise activities) conducted on 

the land withdrawn and reserved by section 2941. 

SEC. 2946. DURATION OF WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION. 

The withdrawal and reservation of public land made by section 

2941 shall terminate on March 31, 2039. 

Subtitle D—White Sands Missile Range, 

New Mexico, and Fort Bliss, Texas 

SEC. 2951. WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC LAND. 

(a) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, the Federal 

land described in subsection (b) is withdrawn from— 

(1) entry, appropriation, and disposal under the public land 

laws; 

(2) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; 

and 

(3) operation of the mineral leasing, mineral materials, 

and geothermal leasing laws. 

(b) DESCRIPTION OF FEDERAL LAND.—The Federal land referred 

to in subsection (a) consists of approximately 5,100 acres of land 

depicted as ‘‘Parcel 1’’ on the map entitled ‘‘White Sands Missile 

Range/Fort Bliss/BLM Land Transfer and Withdrawal’’, dated April 

3, 2012, and filed in accordance with section 2912. 

(c) RESERVATION.—The Federal land described in subsection 

(b) is reserved for use by the Secretary of the Army for military 

purposes in accordance with Public Land Order 833, dated May 

27, 1952 (17 Fed. Reg. 4822). 

SEC. 2952. GRAZING. 

(a) ISSUANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF PERMITS AND LEASES.— 

The Secretary of the Interior shall manage the issuance and 

administration of grazing permits and leases, including the renewal 

of permits and leases, on the public land withdrawn by section 

2951, consistent with all applicable laws (including regulations) 
H. R. 3304—369 

and policies of the Secretary of the Interior relating to the permits 

and leases. 

(b) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS.—With respect to any grazing permit 

or lease issued after the date of enactment of this Act for land 

withdrawn by section 2951, the Secretary of the Interior and the 

Secretary of the Army shall jointly establish procedures that— 

(1) are consistent with Department of the Army explosive 

and range safety standards; and 

(2) provide for the safe use of the withdrawn land. 

(c) ASSIGNMENT.—With the agreement of the Secretary of the 

Army, the Secretary of the Interior may assign the authority to 

issue and to administer grazing permits and leases to the Secretary 

of the Army, except that the assignment may not include the 

authority to discontinue grazing on the land withdrawn by section 

2951. 

Subtitle E—Chocolate Mountain Aerial 

Gunnery Range, California 

SEC. 2961. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION OF PUBLIC 

LAND. 

(a) TRANSFER REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the 

Navy certain public land administered by the Bureau of Land 

Management in Imperial and Riverside Counties, California, consisting of approximately 228,324 acres, as generally depicted on 

the map titled ‘‘Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery RangeAdministration’s Land Withdrawal Legislation Proposal Map’’, 

dated October 30, 2013, and filed in accordance with subsection 

(d). 

(b) VALID EXISTING RIGHTS.—The transfer of administrative 

jurisdiction under subsection (a) shall be subject to any valid 

existing rights, including any property, easements, or improvements 

held by the Bureau of Reclamation and appurtenant to the 

Coachella Canal. The Secretary of the Navy shall provide for reasonable access by the Bureau of Reclamation for inspection and maintenance purposes not inconsistent with military training. 

(c) TIME FOR CONVEYANCE.—The transfer of administrative 

jurisdiction under subsection (a) shall occur pursuant to a schedule 

agreed to by the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 

the Navy. 

(d) MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION.— (1) PREPARATION AND PUBLICATION.—The Secretary of the 

Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal description 

of the public land to be transferred under subsection (a). 

(2) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary of the 

Interior shall file with the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural 

Resources of the House of Representatives— 

(A) a copy of the legal description prepared under 

paragraph (1); and 

(B) the map referred to in subsection (a). 

(3) AVAILABILITY FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION.—Copies of the 

legal description and map filed under paragraph (2) shall be 

available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of— 

(A) the Bureau of Land Management; 
H. R. 3304—370 

(B) the Office of the Commanding Officer, Marine 

Corps Air Station Yuma, Arizona; 

(C) the Office of the Commander, Navy Region Southwest; and 

(D) the Office of the Secretary of the Navy. 

(4) FORCE OF LAW.—The legal description and map filed 

under paragraph (2) shall have the same force and effect as 

if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the Interior 

may correct clerical and typographical errors in the legal 

description or map. 

(5) REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS.—The transfer required by 

subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except 

that the Secretary of the Navy shall reimburse the Secretary 

of the Interior for any costs incurred by the Secretary of the 

Interior to prepare the legal description and map under this 

subsection. 

SEC. 2962. MANAGEMENT AND USE OF TRANSFERRED LAND. 

(a) TREATMENT AND USE OF TRANSFERRED LAND.—Upon the 

receipt of the land under section 2961— 

(1) the land shall be treated as property (as defined in 

section 102(9) of title 40, United States Code) under the 

administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy; and 

(2) the Secretary of the Navy shall administer the land 

as the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California, 

and continue to authorize use of the land for military purposes. 

(b) PROTECTION OF DESERT TORTOISE.—Nothing in the transfer 

required by section 2961 shall affect the prior designation of certain 

lands within the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range as 

critical habitat for the desert tortoise (Gopherus Agassizii). 

(c) WITHDRAWAL OF MINERAL ESTATE.—Subject to valid existing 

rights, the mineral estate of the land to be transferred under 

section 2961 is withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under 

the public land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral leasing 

laws, and geothermal leasing laws, for as long as the land is 

under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy. 

(d) INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN.— Not later than one year after the transfer of the land under section 

2961, the Secretary of the Navy, in cooperation with the Secretary 

of the Interior, shall prepare an integrated natural resources 

management plan pursuant to the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et 

seq.) for the transferred land and for land that, as of the date 

of the enactment of this Act, is under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy underlying the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range. 

(e) RELATION TO GENERAL PROVISIONS.—Subtitle A does not 

apply to the land transferred under section 2961 or to the management of such land as provided for in this subtitle. 

SEC. 2963. EFFECT OF TERMINATION OF MILITARY USE. 

(a) NOTICE AND EFFECT.—Upon a determination by the Secretary of the Navy that there is no longer a military need for 

all or portions of the land transferred under section 2961, the 

Secretary of the Navy shall notify the Secretary of the Interior 

of such determination. Subject to subsections (b), (c), and (d), the 

Secretary of the Navy shall transfer the land subject to such a 

notice back to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of 

the Interior. 
H. R. 3304—371 

(b) CONTAMINATION.—Before transmitting a notice under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall prepare a written 

determination concerning whether and to what extent the land 

to be transferred is contaminated with explosive materials or toxic 

or hazardous substances. A copy of the determination shall be 

transmitted with the notice. Copies of the notice and the determination shall be published in the Federal Register. 

(c) DECONTAMINATION.—The Secretary of the Navy shall decontaminate any contaminated land that is the subject of a notice 

under subsection (a) if— 

(1) the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the 

Secretary of the Navy, determines that— 

(A) decontamination is practicable and economically 

feasible (taking into consideration the potential future use 

and value of the land); and 

(B) upon decontamination, the land could be opened 

to operation of some or all of the public land laws, including 

the mining laws; and 

(2) funds are appropriated for such decontamination. 

(d) ALTERNATIVE.—The Secretary of the Interior is not required 

to accept land proposed for transfer under subsection (a) if the 

Secretary of the Interior is unable to make the determinations 

under subsection (c)(1) or if Congress does not appropriate a sufficient amount of funds for the decontamination of the land. 

SEC. 2964. TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF EXISTING WITHDRAWAL 

PERIOD. 

Notwithstanding subsection (a) of section 806 of the California 

Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 1994 (title VIII 

of Public Law 103–433; 108 Stat. 4505), the withdrawal and reservation of the land transferred under section 2961 shall not terminate 

until the date on which the land transfer required by section 2961 

is executed. 

SEC. 2965. WATER RIGHTS. 

(a) NO RESERVATION OF WATER RIGHTS.—Nothing in this subtitle— 

(1) establishes a reservation in favor of the United States 

with respect to any water or water right on the land transferred 

by this subtitle; or 

(2) to authorize the appropriation of water on the land 

transferred by this subtitle except in accordance with applicable 

State law. 

(b) EFFECT ON PREVIOUSLY ACQUIRED OR RESERVED WATER

RIGHTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this subtitle affects any water 

rights acquired or reserved by the United States before the 

date of enactment of this Act on the land transferred by this 

subtitle. 

(2) AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY.—The Secretary of the Navy 

may exercise any water rights described in paragraph (1). 

SEC. 2966. REALIGNMENT OF RANGE BOUNDARY AND RELATED 

TRANSFER OF TITLE. 

(a) REALIGNMENT; PURPOSE.—The Secretary of the Interior and 

the Secretary of the Navy shall realign the boundary of the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, as in effect on the date 
H. R. 3304—372 

of the enactment of this Act, to improve public safety and management of the Range, consistent with the following: 

(1) The northwestern boundary of the Chocolate Mountain 

Aerial Gunnery Range shall be realigned to the edge of the 

Bradshaw Trail so that the Trail is entirely on public land 

under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior. 

(2) The centerline of the Bradshaw Trail shall be delineated 

by the Secretary of the Interior in consultation with the Secretary of the Navy, beginning at its western terminus at Township 8 South, Range 12 East, Section 6 eastward to Township 

8 South, Range 17 East, Section 32 where it leaves the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range. 

(3) The Secretary of the Navy shall relinquish to the Secretary of the Interior the approximately 2,000 acres of public 

land withdrawn for military use that is located immediately 

north of the Bradshaw Trail, and the Secretary of the Interior 

shall manage the land in accordance with the applicable land 

use plan developed under section of section 202 of the Federal 

Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712). 

(b) TRANSFERS RELATED TO REALIGNMENT.— 

(1) TRANSFERS TO REFLECT BOUNDARY REALIGNMENT.—The 

Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy shall 

make such transfers of administrative jurisdiction as may be 

necessary to reflect the results of the boundary realignment 

carried out pursuant to subsection (a). 

(2) BRADSHAW TRAIL MANAGEMENT.—The approximately 

600 acres of land north of the Bradshaw Trail identified as 

fee-owned lands available for disposal may be used to establish 

a maximum number of acres of land that the Secretary of 

the Navy may transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of 

the Secretary of the Interior in order to improve management 

of the Bradshaw Trail. 

(c) APPLICABILITY OF NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT

OF 1969.—The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 

4321 et seq.) shall not apply to any transfer of land made under 

subsection (b) or any decontamination actions undertaken in connection with such a transfer. 

(d) DECONTAMINATION.—The Secretary of the Navy shall maintain, to the extent funds are available for such purpose and consistent with applicable Federal and State law, a program of decontamination of any contamination caused by defense-related uses 

on land transferred under subsection (b). The Secretary of Defense 

shall include a description of such decontamination activities in 

the annual report required by section 2711 of title 10, United 

States Code. 

(e) TIMELINE.—The delineation of the Bradshaw Trail under 

subsection (a) and any transfer of land under subsection (b) shall 

occur pursuant to a schedule agreed to by the Secretary of the 

Interior and the Secretary of the Navy, but in no case later than 

two years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
H. R. 3304—373 

Subtitle F—Naval Air Weapons Station 

China Lake, California 

SEC. 2971. WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC LAND. 

(a) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights and except 

as otherwise provided in this subtitle, the public land (including 

interests in land) described in subsection (b), and all other areas 

within the boundary of the land depicted on the map described 

in that subsection that may become subject to the operation of 

the public land laws, is withdrawn from all forms of appropriation 

under the public land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral 

leasing laws, and the geothermal leasing laws. 

(b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The public land (including interests 

in land) referred to in subsection (a) is the Federal land located 

within the boundaries of the Naval Air Weapons Station China 

Lake, California, comprising approximately 1,045,000 acres in Inyo, 

Kern, and San Bernardino Counties, California, as generally 

depicted on the maps entitled ‘‘Naval Air Weapons Station China 

Lake Withdrawal—Renewal’’, ‘‘North Range’’, and ‘‘South Range’’, 

dated March 18, 2013, and filed in accordance with section 2912. 

(c) RESERVATION.—The land withdrawn by subsection (a) is 

reserved for use by the Secretary of the Navy for the following 

purposes: 

(1) Use as a research, development, test, and evaluation 

laboratory. 

(2) Use as a range for air warfare weapons and weapon 

systems. 

(3) Use as a high-hazard testing and training area for 

aerial gunnery, rocketry, electronic warfare and countermeasures, tactical maneuvering and air support, and directed 

energy and unmanned aerial systems. 

(4) Geothermal leasing, development, and related power 

production activities. 

(5) Other defense-related purposes that are— 

(A) consistent with the purposes described in the preceding paragraphs; and 

(B) authorized under section 2914. 

SEC. 2972. MANAGEMENT OF WITHDRAWN AND RESERVED LAND. 

(a) APPLICABLE LAWS.—Except as provided in section 2973, 

during the period of the withdrawal and reservation of land by 

section 2971, the Secretary of the Interior shall manage the land 

withdrawn and reserved by that section in accordance with— 

(1) subtitle A and this subtitle; 

(2) the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 

(43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and 

(3) any other applicable law. 

(b) AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES.—To the extent consistent with 

applicable law and Executive orders, the land withdrawn by section 

2971 may be managed in a manner that permits the following 

activities: 

(1) Grazing. 

(2) Protection of wildlife and wildlife habitat. 

(3) Preservation of cultural properties. 

(4) Control of predatory and other animals. 

(5) Recreation and education. 
H. R. 3304—374 

(6) Prevention and appropriate suppression of brush and 

range fires resulting from non-military activities. 

(7) Geothermal leasing and development and related power 

production activities. 

(c) NONDEFENSE USES.—All nondefense-related uses of the land 

withdrawn by this section (including the uses described in subsection (b)), shall be subject to any conditions and restrictions 

that the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy 

jointly determine to be necessary to permit the defense-related 

use of the land for the purposes described in this section. 

(d) ISSUANCE OF LEASES AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior shall be 

responsible for the issuance of any lease, easement, right-ofway, permit, license, or other instrument authorized by law 

with respect to any activity that involves both— 

(A) the land withdrawn and reserved by section 2971; 

and 

(B) any other public land in the vicinity of the land 

withdrawn and reserved by section 2971 that is not under 

the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy. 

(2) CONSENT REQUIRED.—Subject to section 2974, any lease, 

easement, right-of-way, permit, license, or other instrument 

issued under paragraph (1) shall— 

(A) only be issued with the consent of the Secretary 

of the Navy; and 

(B) be subject to such conditions as the Secretary of 

the Navy may require with respect to the land withdrawn 

and reserved by section 2971. 

SEC. 2973. ASSIGNMENT OF MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY TO SECRETARY OF THE NAVY. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO ASSIGN MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY.—The 

Secretary of the Interior may assign the management responsibility, 

in whole or in part, for the land withdrawn and reserved by section 

2971 to the Secretary of the Navy. 

(b) APPLICABLE LAW.—On assignment of the management 

responsibility under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall 

manage the land in accordance with— 

(1) subtitle A and this subtitle; 

(2) title I of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et seq.); 

(3) the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 

(43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); 

(4) cooperative management arrangements entered into by 

the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy; 

and 

(5) any other applicable law. 

SEC. 2974. GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES. 

(a) TREATMENT OF EXISTING LEASES.—Nothing in this subtitle 

affects— 

(1) geothermal leases issued by the Secretary of the Interior 

before the date of enactment of this Act; or 

(2) the responsibility of the Secretary of the Interior to 

administer and manage the leases described in paragraph (1) 

consistent with the provisions of this subtitle. 

(b) AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.—Nothing 

in this subtitle or any other provision of law prohibits the Secretary 

of the Interior from issuing, subject to the concurrence of the 
H. R. 3304—375 

Secretary of the Navy, and administering any lease under the 

Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.) and any 

other applicable law for the development and use of geothermal 

steam and associated geothermal resources on the land withdrawn 

and reserved by section 2971. 

(c) APPLICABLE LAW.—Nothing in this subtitle affects the geothermal exploration and development authority of the Secretary 

of the Navy under section 2917 of title 10, United States Code, 

with respect to the land withdrawn and reserved by section 2971, 

except that the Secretary of the Navy shall obtain the concurrence 

of the Secretary of the Interior before taking action under section 

2917 of title 10, United States Code. 

(d) NAVY CONTRACTS.—On the expiration of the withdrawal 

and reservation of land under section 2971 or the relinquishment 

of the land, any Navy contract for the development of geothermal 

resources at Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake that is in 

effect on the date of the expiration or relinquishment shall remain 

in effect, except that the Secretary of the Interior, with the consent 

of the Secretary of the Navy, may offer to substitute a standard 

geothermal lease for the contract. 

SEC. 2975. WILD HORSES AND BURROS. 

(a) MANAGEMENT.—The Secretary of the Navy— 

(1) shall be responsible for the management of wild horses 

and burros located on the land withdrawn and reserved by 

section 2971; and 

(2) may use helicopters and motorized vehicles for the 

management of wild horses and burros on such land. 

(b) REQUIREMENTS.—The activities authorized under subsection 

(a) shall be conducted in accordance with laws applicable to the 

management of wild horses and burros on public land. 

(c) AGREEMENT.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy shall enter into an agreement for the 

implementation of the management of wild horses and burros under 

this section. 

SEC. 2976. CONTINUATION OF EXISTING AGREEMENT. 

The agreement between the Secretary of the Interior and the 

Secretary of the Navy entered into before the date of enactment 

of this Act under section 805 of the California Military Lands 

Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 1994 (Public Law 103–433; 108 

Stat. 4503) shall continue in effect until the earlier of— 

(1) the date on which the Secretary of the Interior and 

the Secretary of the Navy enter into a new agreement to 

replace such section 805 agreement; or 

(2) the date that is one year after the date of enactment 

of this Act. 

SEC. 2977. MANAGEMENT PLANS. 

(a) COOPERATION IN DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT PLAN.— 

The Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior shall 

update and maintain cooperative arrangements concerning land 

resources and land uses on the land withdrawn and reserved by 

section 2971. 

(b) PURPOSE.—A cooperative arrangement entered into under 

subsection (a) shall focus on and apply to sustainable management 

and protection of the natural and cultural resources and environmental values found on the land withdrawn and reserved by section 
H. R. 3304—376 

2971, consistent with the defense-related purposes for which the 

land is withdrawn and reserved. 

(c) COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MANAGEMENT PLAN.—A cooperative arrangement entered into under subsection (a) shall include 

a comprehensive land use management plan that integrates and 

is consistent with any applicable law, including— 

(1) subtitle A and this subtitle; 

(2) title I of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et seq.); and 

(3) the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 

(43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and 

(d) ANNUAL REVIEW.—The Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior shall— 

(1) annually review the comprehensive land use management plan developed under subsection (c); and 

(2) update the comprehensive land use management plan 

as the Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior 

determine to be necessary— 

(A) to respond to evolving management requirements; 

and 

(B) to complement the updates of other applicable land 

use and resource management and planning. 

(e) IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior and the 

Secretary of the Navy may enter into a written agreement 

to implement the comprehensive land use management plan 

developed under subsection (c). 

(2) COMPONENTS.—Such an implementation agreement— 

(A) shall be for a duration that is equal to the period 

of the withdrawal and reservation of land under section 

2971; and 

(B) may be amended from time to time. 

SEC. 2978. TERMINATION OF PRIOR WITHDRAWALS. 

(a) TERMINATION.—Subject to subsection (b), the withdrawal 

and reservation under section 803(a) of the California Military 

Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 1994 (Public Law 103– 

433; 108 Stat. 4502) is terminated. 

(b) LIMITATION.—Notwithstanding the termination under subsection (a), all rules, regulations, orders, permits, and other privileges issued or granted by the Secretary of the Interior or the 

Secretary of the Navy with respect to the land withdrawn and 

reserved under section 803(a) of the California Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 1994 (Public Law 103–433; 108 

Stat. 4502), unless inconsistent with the provisions of this subtitle, 

shall remain in force until modified, suspended, overruled, or otherwise changed by— 

(1) the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of the 

Navy (as applicable); 

(2) a court of competent jurisdiction; or 

(3) operation of law. 

SEC. 2979. DURATION OF WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION. 

The withdrawal and reservation of public land made by section 

2971 shall terminate on March 31, 2039. 
H. R. 3304—377 

DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations 

Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration. 

Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup. 

Sec. 3103. Other defense activities. 

Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations 

Sec. 3111. Clarification of principles of National Nuclear Security Administration. 

Sec. 3112. Cost estimation and program evaluation by National Nuclear Security 

Administration. 

Sec. 3113. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk. 

Sec. 3114. Limitation on availability of funds for National Nuclear Security Administration. 

Sec. 3115. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Administrator for 

Nuclear Security. 

Sec. 3116. Establishment of Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Response, 

and Testing. 

Sec. 3117. Authorization of modular building strategy as an alternative to the replacement project for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building, 

Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico. 

Sec. 3118. Comparative analysis of warhead life extension options. 

Sec. 3119. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into transactions 

to carry out certain research projects. 

Sec. 3120. Increase in construction design threshold. 

Subtitle C—Plans and Reports 

Sec. 3121. Annual report and certification on status of security of atomic energy defense facilities. 

Sec. 3122. Modifications to annual reports regarding the condition of the nuclear 

weapons stockpile. 

Sec. 3123. Inclusion of integrated plutonium strategy in nuclear weapons stockpile 

stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan. 

Sec. 3124. Modifications to cost-benefit analyses for competition of management 

and operating contracts. 

Sec. 3125. Modification of deadlines for certain reports relating to program on scientific engagement for nonproliferation. 

Sec. 3126. Modification of certain reports on cost containment for uranium capabilities replacement project. 

Sec. 3127. Plan for tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation. 

Sec. 3128. Plan for improvement and integration of financial management of nuclear security enterprise. 

Sec. 3129. Plan for developing exascale computing and incorporating such computing into the stockpile stewardship program. 

Sec. 3130. Study and plan for extension of certain pilot program principles. 

Sec. 3131. Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries. 

Sec. 3132. Repeal of certain reporting requirements. 

Subtitle D—Other Matters 

Sec. 3141. Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy. 

Sec. 3142. Modification of deadlines for Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise. 

Sec. 3143. Department of Energy land conveyance. 

Sec. 3144. Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954. 

Sec. 3145. Technical corrections to the National Nuclear Security Administration 

Act. 

Sec. 3146. Technical corrections to the Atomic Energy Defense Act. 

Sec. 3147. Sense of Congress on B61–12 life extension program. 

Sec. 3148. Sense of Congress on establishment of an advisory board on toxic substances and worker health. 
H. R. 3304—378 

Subtitle A—National Security Programs 

Authorizations 

SEC. 3101. NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 

authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for 

fiscal year 2014 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security 

Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding 

table in section 4701. 

(b) AUTHORIZATION OF NEW PLANT PROJECTS.—From funds 

referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out 

plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant 

projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration as follows: 

Project 14–D–710, Device Assembly Facility Argus 

Installation Project, Nevada National Security Site, Las 

Vegas, Nevada, $14,000,000. 

Project 14–D–901, Spent Fueling Handling Recapitalization Project, Naval Reactors Facility, Idaho, $45,400,000. 

Project 14–D–902, KL Materials Characterization Laboratory, Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, Schenectady, 

New York, $1,000,000. 

SEC. 3102. DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for defense environmental 

cleanup activities in carrying out programs as specified in the 

funding table in section 4701. 

SEC. 3103. OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for other defense activities 

in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 

4701. 

Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, 

Restrictions, and Limitations 

SEC. 3111. CLARIFICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF NATIONAL NUCLEAR 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. 

Subsection (c) of section 3211 of the National Nuclear Security 

Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(c) OPERATIONS AND ACTIVITIES TO BE CARRIED OUT CONSISTENTLY WITH CERTAIN PRINCIPLES.—In carrying out the mission 

of the Administration, the Administrator shall ensure that all operations and activities of the Administration are consistent with the 

principles of— 

‘‘(1) protecting the environment; 

‘‘(2) safeguarding the safety and health of the public and 

of the workforce of the Administration; and 

‘‘(3) ensuring the security of the nuclear weapons, nuclear 

material, and classified information in the custody of the 

Administration.’’. 
H. R. 3304—379 

SEC. 3112. COST ESTIMATION AND PROGRAM EVALUATION BY 

NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF DIRECTOR FOR COST ESTIMATING AND

PROGRAM EVALUATION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq.) is amended 

by adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘SEC. 3221. DIRECTOR FOR COST ESTIMATING AND PROGRAM EVALUATION. 

‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—(1) There is in the Administration a 

Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation (in this section referred to as the ‘Director’). 

‘‘(2) The position of the Director shall be a Senior Executive 

Service position (as defined in section 3132(a) of title 5, United 

States Code). 

‘‘(b) DUTIES.—(1) The Director shall be the principal advisor 

to the Administrator, the Deputy Secretary of Energy, and the 

Secretary of Energy with respect to cost estimation and program 

evaluation for the Administration. 

‘‘(2) The Administrator may not delegate responsibility for 

receiving or acting on communications from the Director with 

respect to cost estimation and program evaluation for the Administration. 

‘‘(c) ACTIVITIES FOR COST ESTIMATION.—(1) The Director shall 

be the responsible for the following activities relating to cost estimation: 

‘‘(A) Advising the Administrator on policies and procedures 

for cost analysis and estimation by the Administration, 

including the determination of confidence levels with respect 

to cost estimates. 

‘‘(B) Reviewing cost estimates and evaluating the performance baseline for each major atomic energy defense acquisition 

program. 

‘‘(C) Advising the Administrator on policies and procedures 

for developing technology readiness assessments for major 

atomic energy defense acquisition programs that are consistent 

with the guidelines of the Department of Energy for technology 

readiness assessments. 

‘‘(D) Reviewing technology readiness assessments for such 

programs to ensure that such programs are meeting levels 

of confidence associated with appropriate overall system 

performance. 

‘‘(E) As directed by the Administrator, conducting independent cost estimates for such programs. 

‘‘(2) A review, evaluation, or cost estimate conducted under 

subparagraph (B), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1) shall be considered 

an inherently governmental function, but the Director may use 

data collected by a national security laboratory or a management 

and operating contractor of the Administration in conducting such 

a review, evaluation, or cost estimate. 

‘‘(3) The Director shall submit in writing to the Administrator 

the following: 

‘‘(A) The certification of the Director with respect to each 

review, evaluation, and cost estimate conducted under subparagraph (B), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1). 
H. R. 3304—380 

‘‘(B) A statement of the confidence level of the Director 

with respect to each such review, evaluation, and cost estimate, 

including an identification of areas of uncertainty, risk, and 

opportunity discovered in conducting each such review, evaluation, and cost estimate. 

‘‘(d) ACTIVITIES FOR PROGRAM EVALUATION.—(1) The Director 

shall be responsible for the following activities relating to program 

evaluation: 

‘‘(A) Reviewing and commenting on policies and procedures 

for setting requirements for the future-years nuclear security 

program under section 3253 and for prioritizing and estimating 

the funding required by the Administration for that program. 

‘‘(B) Reviewing the future-years nuclear security program 

on an annual basis to ensure that the program is accurate 

and thorough. 

‘‘(C) Advising the Administrator on policies and procedures 

for analyses of alternatives for major atomic energy defense 

acquisition programs. 

‘‘(D) As part of the planning, programming, and budgeting 

process of the Administration under sections 3251 and 3252, 

analyzing the planning phase of that process, advising on programmatic and fiscal year guidance, and managing the program 

review phase of that process. 

‘‘(E) Developing and managing the submittal of the Selected 

Acquisition Reports and independent cost estimates on nuclear 

weapons systems undergoing major life extension under section 

4217 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537). 

‘‘(F) Reviewing cost and schedule baselines for projects 

under section 4713 of that Act (50 U.S.C. 2753) and managing 

notifications to the congressional defense committees of cost 

overruns under that section. 

‘‘(2) A review conducted under paragraph (1)(B) shall be considered an inherently governmental function, but the Director may 

use data collected by a national security laboratory or a management and operating contractor of the Administration in conducting 

such a review. 

‘‘(3) The Director shall submit to Congress a report on any 

major programmatic deviations from the future-years nuclear security program discovered in conducting a review under paragraph 

(1)(B) at or about the time the budget of the President is submitted 

to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, 

for the next fiscal year. 

‘‘(e) DATA COLLECTION AND ACCESSIBILITY.—The Administrator, 

acting through the Director, shall, as appropriate, seek to use 

procedures, processes, and policies for collecting cost data and 

making that data accessible that are similar to the procedures, 

processes, and policies used by the Defense Cost Analysis Resource 

Center of the Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation 

of the Department of Defense for those purposes. 

‘‘(f) STAFF.—The Administrator shall ensure that the Director 

has sufficient numbers of personnel who have competence in technical matters, budgetary matters, cost estimation, technology readiness analysis, and other appropriate matters to carry out the functions required by this section. 

‘‘(g) REPORTS BY DIRECTOR.—The Director shall submit to Congress at or about the time that the budget of the President is 

submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United 
H. R. 3304—381 

States Code, for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2018, a report 

that includes the following: 

‘‘(1) A description of activities conducted by the Director 

during the calendar year preceding the submission of the report 

that are related to the duties and activities described in this 

section. 

‘‘(2) A list of all major atomic energy defense acquisition 

programs and a concise description of the status of each such 

program and project in meeting cost and critical schedule milestones. 

‘‘(h) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) MAJOR ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAM.— 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraph 

(B), the term ‘major atomic energy defense acquisition program’ means an atomic energy defense acquisition program 

of the Administration— 

‘‘(i) the total project cost of which is more than 

$500,000,000; or 

‘‘(ii) the total lifetime cost of which is more than 

$1,000,000,000. 

‘‘(B) EXCLUSION OF CAPITAL ASSETS ACQUISITION

PROJECTS.—The term ‘major atomic energy defense acquisition program’ does not include a project covered by Department of Energy Order 413.3 (or a successor order) for 

the acquisition of capital assets for atomic energy defense 

activities. 

‘‘(2) PERFORMANCE BASELINE.—The term ‘performance baseline’, with respect to a major atomic energy defense acquisition 

program, means the key parameters with respect to performance, scope, cost, and schedule for the project budget of the 

program.’’. 

(2) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.—Not later than 270 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for 

Nuclear Security and the Director of the Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation of the Department of Defense 

shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees 

a plan for the implementation of section 3221 of the National 

Nuclear Security Administration Act, as added by paragraph 

(1), that includes the following: 

(A) An identification of the number of personnel 

required to support the Director for Cost Estimating and 

Program Evaluation established under such section 3221. 

(B) A description of the functions of such personnel. 

(C) A plan for training such personnel in coordination 

with the Office of Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation 

of the Department of Defense with respect to the activities 

described in subsections (c)(1) and (d)(1) of such section 

3221. 

(D) An estimate of the time required to hire and train 

such personnel. 

(E) A plan for developing cost estimation and program 

evaluation activities jointly with the Department of Defense 

on strategic system programs to the extent practicable 

and beneficial to both the National Nuclear Security 

Administration and the Department of Defense. 
H. R. 3304—382 

(3) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for the 

National Nuclear Security Administration Act is amended by 

inserting after the item relating to section 3220 the following 

new item: 

‘‘Sec. 3221. Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation.’’. 

(b) INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATES ON LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAMS AND NEW NUCLEAR FACILITIES.—Section 4217(b) of the 

Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537(b)) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘for purposes of this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘submitted under this subsection before 

October 1, 2015,’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3) Each cost estimate submitted under this subsection shall 

be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 

annex if necessary.’’. 

SEC. 3113. ENHANCED PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY TO MANAGE 

SUPPLY CHAIN RISK. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of title XLVIII of the Atomic 

Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2781 et seq.) is amended by adding 

at the end the following new section: 

‘‘SEC. 4806. ENHANCED PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY TO MANAGE 

SUPPLY CHAIN RISK. 

‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of 

Energy may— 

‘‘(1) carry out a covered procurement action; and 

‘‘(2) notwithstanding any other provision of law, limit, in 

whole or in part, the disclosure of information relating to the 

basis for carrying out a covered procurement action. 

‘‘(b) REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary may exercise the authority 

under subsection (a) only after— 

‘‘(1) obtaining a risk assessment that demonstrates that 

there is a significant supply chain risk to a covered system; 

‘‘(2) making a determination in writing, in unclassified 

or classified form, that— 

‘‘(A) the use of the authority under subsection (a) is 

necessary to protect national security by reducing supply 

chain risk; 

‘‘(B) less restrictive measures are not reasonably available to reduce the supply chain risk; and 

‘‘(C) in a case in which the Secretary plans to limit 

disclosure of information under subsection (a)(2), the risk 

to national security of the disclosure of the information 

outweighs the risk of not disclosing the information; and 

‘‘(3) submitting to the appropriate congressional committees, not later than seven days after the date on which the 

Secretary makes the determination under paragraph (2), a 

notice of such determination, in classified or unclassified form, 

that includes— 

‘‘(A) the information required by section 3304(e)(2)(A) 

of title 41, United States Code; 

‘‘(B) a summary of the risk assessment required under 

paragraph (1); and 

‘‘(C) a summary of the basis for the determination, 

including a discussion of less restrictive measures that 
H. R. 3304—383 

were considered and why such measures were not reasonably available to reduce supply chain risk. 

‘‘(c) NOTIFICATIONS.—If the Secretary has exercised the 

authority under subsection (a), the Secretary shall— 

‘‘(1) notify appropriate parties of the covered procurement 

action and the basis for the action only to the extent necessary 

to carry out the covered procurement action; 

‘‘(2) notify other Federal agencies responsible for procurement that may be subject to the same or similar supply chain 

risk, in a manner and to the extent consistent with the requirements of national security; and 

‘‘(3) ensure the confidentiality of any notifications under 

paragraph (1) or (2). 

‘‘(d) LIMITATION OF REVIEW.—No action taken by the Secretary 

under the authority under subsection (a) shall be subject to review 

in any Federal court. 

‘‘(e) REVIEW BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED

STATES.—Not later than one year after the effective date specified 

in subsection (g)(1), and annually for four years thereafter, the 

Comptroller General of the United States shall— 

‘‘(1) review the authority provided under subsection (a), 

including— 

‘‘(A) the adequacy of resources, such as trained personnel, to effectively exercise that authority during the 

four-year period beginning on that effective date; and 

‘‘(B) the sufficiency of determinations under subsection 

(b)(2); 

‘‘(2) review the thoroughness of the process and systems 

utilized by the Office of the Chief Information Officer and 

the Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence of the Department of Energy to reasonably detect supply chain threats to 

the national security functions of the Department; and 

‘‘(3) submit to the appropriate congressional committees 

a report that includes— 

‘‘(A) the results of the reviews conducted under paragraphs (1) and (2); 

‘‘(B) any recommendations of the Comptroller General 

for improving the process and systems described in paragraph (2); and 

‘‘(C) a description of the status of the implementation 

of recommendations, if any, with respect to that process 

and such systems made by the Comptroller General in 

previous years. 

‘‘(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term 

‘appropriate congressional committees’ means— 

‘‘(A) the congressional defense committees; and 

‘‘(B) the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

of the House of Representatives. 

‘‘(2) COVERED ITEM OF SUPPLY.—The term ‘covered item 

of supply’ means an item— 

‘‘(A) that is purchased for inclusion in a covered system; 

and 

‘‘(B) the loss of integrity of which could result in a 

supply chain risk for a covered system. 
H. R. 3304—384 

‘‘(3) COVERED PROCUREMENT.—The term ‘covered procurement’ means the following: 

‘‘(A) A source selection for a covered system or a covered item of supply involving either a performance specification, as described in subsection (a)(3)(B) of section 3306 

of title 41, United States Code, or an evaluation factor, 

as described in subsection (b)(1) of such section, relating 

to supply chain risk. 

‘‘(B) The consideration of proposals for and issuance 

of a task or delivery order for a covered system or a 

covered item of supply, as provided in section 4106(d)(3) 

of title 41, United States Code, where the task or delivery 

order contract concerned includes a contract clause establishing a requirement relating to supply chain risk. 

‘‘(C) Any contract action involving a contract for a 

covered system or a covered item of supply if the contract 

includes a clause establishing requirements relating to 

supply chain risk. 

‘‘(4) COVERED PROCUREMENT ACTION.—The term ‘covered 

procurement action’ means, with respect to an action that 

occurs in the course of conducting a covered procurement, any 

of the following: 

‘‘(A) The exclusion of a source that fails to meet qualification requirements established pursuant to section 3311 

of title 41, United States Code, for the purpose of reducing 

supply chain risk in the acquisition of covered systems. 

‘‘(B) The exclusion of a source that fails to achieve 

an acceptable rating with regard to an evaluation factor 

providing for the consideration of supply chain risk in 

the evaluation of proposals for the award of a contract 

or the issuance of a task or delivery order. 

‘‘(C) The withholding of consent for a contractor to 

subcontract with a particular source or the direction to 

a contractor for a covered system to exclude a particular 

source from consideration for a subcontract under the contract. 

‘‘(5) COVERED SYSTEM.—The term ‘covered system’ means 

the following: 

‘‘(A) National security systems (as defined in section 

3542(b) of title 44, United States Code) and components 

of such systems. 

‘‘(B) Nuclear weapons and components of nuclear 

weapons. 

‘‘(C) Items associated with the design, development, 

production, and maintenance of nuclear weapons or components of nuclear weapons. 

‘‘(D) Items associated with the surveillance of the 

nuclear weapon stockpile. 

‘‘(E) Items associated with the design and development 

of nonproliferation and counterproliferation programs and 

systems. 

‘‘(6) SUPPLY CHAIN RISK.—The term ‘supply chain risk’ 

means the risk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously 

introduce unwanted function, or otherwise subvert the design, 

integrity, manufacturing, production, distribution, installation, 

operation, or maintenance of a covered system or covered item 
H. R. 3304—385 

of supply so as to surveil, deny, disrupt, or otherwise degrade 

the function, use, or operation of the system or item of supply. 

‘‘(g) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—This section shall take effect on the 

date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014. 

‘‘(2) APPLICABILITY.—The authority under subsection (a) 

shall apply to— 

‘‘(A) contracts awarded on or after the effective date 

specified in paragraph (1); and 

‘‘(B) task and delivery orders issued on or after that 

effective date pursuant to contracts awarded before, on, 

or after that effective date. 

‘‘(3) TERMINATION.—The authority under this section shall 

terminate on the date that is four years after the effective 

date specified in paragraph (1).’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for the 

Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item 

relating to section 4805 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 4806. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk.’’. 

SEC. 3114. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR NATIONAL 

NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in subsection (d), of the 

funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made 

available for fiscal year 2014 for the National Nuclear Security 

Administration, the amount specified in subsection (c) may not 

be obligated or expended until the date on which the Administrator 

for Nuclear Security submits to the congressional defense committees— 

(1) a detailed plan to realize the planned efficiencies; and 

(2) written certification that the planned efficiencies will 

be achieved during fiscal year 2014. 

(b) UNREALIZED EFFICIENCIES.—If the Administrator does not 

submit to the congressional defense committees the matters 

described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) by the date 

that is 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees 

a report on— 

(1) the amount of planned efficiencies that will not be 

realized during fiscal year 2014; and 

(2) any effects caused by such unrealized planned efficiencies to the programs funded under the directed stockpile 

work and nuclear programs accounts. 

(c) AMOUNT SPECIFIED.—The amount specified in this sub- section is $139,500,000, reduced by the amount the Administrator 

certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Administrator has saved through the planned efficiencies realized during 

fiscal year 2014. 

(d) EXCEPTIONS.—The limitation under subsection (a) shall 

not— 

(1) apply to funds authorized to be appropriated for directed 

stockpile work, nuclear programs, or Naval Reactors; or 

(2) affect the authority of the Secretary of Energy under 

sections 4702, 4705, and 4711 of the Atomic Energy Defense 

Act (50 U.S.C. 2742, 2745, and 2751). 
H. R. 3304—386 

(e) EFFECT OF PLANNED EFFICIENCIES ON LABORATORYDIRECTED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.—The implementation of 

the planned efficiencies may not result in reductions in amounts 

provided for laboratory-directed research and development under 

section 4811(c) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2791(c)) 

in fiscal year 2014. 

(f) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—The limitation under subsection 

(a) shall not be considered a specific denial of funds for purposes 

of the authority referred to in subsection (d)(2). 

(g) PLANNED EFFICIENCIES DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘‘planned efficiencies’’ means the $106,800,000, with respect to 

directed stockpile work, and $32,700,000, with respect to nuclear 

programs, that the Administrator plans to save during fiscal year 

2014 through management efficiency and workforce restructuring 

reductions, as described in the budget request for fiscal year 2014 

that the President submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) 

of title 31, United States Code. 

SEC. 3115. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR OFFICE OF 

THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR NUCLEAR SECURITY. 

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 by section 3101 and available for the Office of the Administrator as specified in the funding table in section 4701, or otherwise 

made available for that Office for that fiscal year, not more than 

75 percent may be obligated or expended until— 

(1) the President transmits to Congress the matters 

required to be transmitted during 2013 and 2014 under section 

4205(f)(2) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 

2525(f)(2)); 

(2) the President transmits to the congressional defense 

committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, 

and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives the matters— 

(A) required to be transmitted during 2013 and 2014 

under section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 

1576); and 

(B) with respect to which the Secretary of Energy 

is responsible; 

(3) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense 

committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, 

and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives the reports required to be submitted during 2013 

and 2014 under section 3122(b) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 

125 Stat. 1710); and 

(4) the Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the 

congressional defense committees— 

(A) the detailed report on the stockpile stewardship, 

management, and infrastructure plan required to be submitted during 2013 under paragraph (2) of section 4203(b) 

of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(b)); 

and 

(B) the summary of the plan required to be submitted 

during 2014 under paragraph (1) of such section. 
H. R. 3304—387 

SEC. 3116. ESTABLISHMENT OF CENTER FOR SECURITY TECHNOLOGY, 

ANALYSIS, RESPONSE, AND TESTING. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security 

shall establish within the nuclear security enterprise (as defined 

in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501) 

a Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Response, and Testing. 

(b) DUTIES.—The center established under subsection (a) shall 

carry out the following: 

(1) Provide to the Administrator, the Chief of Defense 

Nuclear Security, and the management and operating contractors of the nuclear security enterprise a wide range of objective 

expertise on security technologies, systems, analysis, testing, 

and response forces. 

(2) Assist the Administrator in developing standards, 

requirements, analysis methods, and testing criteria with 

respect to security. 

(3) Collect, analyze, and distribute lessons learned with 

respect to security. 

(4) Support inspections and oversight activities with respect 

to security. 

(5) Promote professional development and training for security professionals. 

(6) Provide for advance and bulk procurement for securityrelated acquisitions that affect multiple facilities of the nuclear 

security enterprise. 

(7) Advocate for continual improvement and security excellence throughout the nuclear security enterprise. 

(8) Such other duties as the Administrator may assign. 

SEC. 3117. AUTHORIZATION OF MODULAR BUILDING STRATEGY AS AN 

ALTERNATIVE TO THE REPLACEMENT PROJECT FOR THE 

CHEMISTRY AND METALLURGY RESEARCH BUILDING, 

LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY, NEW MEXICO. 

Section 3114(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2171; 50 U.S.C. 

2535 note) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘No funds’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(1) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.—Except as provided 

in paragraph (2), no funds’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(2) USE OF FUNDS FOR MODULAR BUILDING STRATEGY.— 

The Administrator for Nuclear Security may obligate and 

expend funds referred to in paragraph (1) for activities relating 

to a modular building strategy on and after the date that 

is 60 days after the date on which the Nuclear Weapons Council 

established under section 179 of title 10, United States Code, 

notifies the congressional defense committees that— 

‘‘(A) the modular building strategy— 

‘‘(i) meets requirements for maintaining the 

nuclear weapons stockpile over a 30-year period; 

‘‘(ii) meets requirements for implementation of a 

responsive infrastructure, including meeting plutonium 

pit production requirements; and 

‘‘(iii) will achieve full operating capability for not 

less than two modular structures by not later than 

2027; 
H. R. 3304—388 

‘‘(B) in fiscal year 2015, the National Nuclear Security 

Administration will begin the process of designing and 

building modular buildings in accordance with Department 

of Energy Order 413.3 (relating to relating to program 

management and project management for the acquisition 

of capital assets); and 

‘‘(C) the Administrator will include the costs of the 

modular building strategy in the estimated expenditures 

and proposed appropriations reflected in the future-years 

nuclear security program submitted under section 3253 

of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 

U.S.C. 2453). 

‘‘(3) MODULAR BUILDING STRATEGY DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘modular building strategy’ means an alternative strategy to the replacement project that consists of 

repurposing existing facilities and constructing a series of modular structures, each of which is fully useable, to complement 

the function of the plutonium facility (PF–4) at Los Alamos 

National Laboratory, New Mexico, in accordance with all 

applicable safety and security standards of the Department 

of Energy.’’. 

SEC. 3118. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF WARHEAD LIFE EXTENSION 

OPTIONS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out Phase 6.2 and Phase 6.2A 

of the Joint W78/88–1 Warhead Life Extension Program, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy, acting through 

the Nuclear Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 

10, United States Code, shall conduct a comparative analysis of 

the feasibility of, and preliminary design definitions and cost estimates for, each of the following life extension options: 

(1) A separate life extension option to produce a W78– 

1 warhead. 

(2) A separate life extension option to produce a W88– 

1 warhead. 

(3) An interoperable W78/88–1 life extension option. 

(4) Any other life extension option the Nuclear Weapons 

Council considers appropriate. 

(b) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended 

for Phase 6.3 (development engineering) activities for the Joint 

W78/88–1 Warhead Life Extension Program until the date that 

is 90 days after the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council 

submits to the congressional defense committees a report containing 

the comparative analysis required by subsection (a). 

SEC. 3119. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF ENERGY 

TO ENTER INTO TRANSACTIONS TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 

RESEARCH PROJECTS. 

Section 646(g)(10) of the Department of Energy Organization 

Act (42 U.S.C. 7256(g)(10)) is amended by striking ‘‘September 

30, 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2020’’. 

SEC. 3120. INCREASE IN CONSTRUCTION DESIGN THRESHOLD. 

Section 4706(b) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2746(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘$600,000’’ both places it appears 

and inserting ‘‘$1,000,000’’. 
H. R. 3304—389 

Subtitle C—Plans and Reports 

SEC. 3121. ANNUAL REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON STATUS OF SECURITY OF ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE FACILITIES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4506 of the Atomic Energy Defense 

Act (50 U.S.C. 2657) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘SEC. 4506. ANNUAL REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON STATUS OF 

SECURITY OF ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE FACILITIES. 

‘‘(a) REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE.—(1) Not later than September 30 of each year, the Administrator shall submit to the Secretary of Energy— 

‘‘(A) a report detailing the status of security at facilities 

holding Category I and II quantities of special nuclear material 

that are administered by the Administration; and 

‘‘(B) written certification that such facilities are secure 

and that the security measures at such facilities meet the 

security standards and requirements of the Administration and 

the Department of Energy. 

‘‘(2) If the Administrator is unable to make the certification 

described in paragraph (1)(B) with respect to a facility, the Administrator shall submit to the Secretary with the matters required 

by paragraph (1) a corrective action plan for the facility describing— 

‘‘(A) the deficiency that resulted in the Administrator being 

unable to make the certification; 

‘‘(B) the actions to be taken to correct the deficiency; and 

‘‘(C) timelines for taking such actions. 

‘‘(3) Not later than December 1 of each year, the Secretary 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees the unaltered 

report, certification, and any corrective action plans submitted by 

the Administrator under paragraphs (1) and (2) together with any 

comments of the Secretary. 

‘‘(b) REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE

FACILITIES NOT ADMINISTERED BY THE ADMINISTRATION.—(1) Not 

later than December 1 of each year, the Secretary shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees— 

‘‘(A) a report detailing the status of the security of atomic 

energy defense facilities holding Category I and II quantities 

of special nuclear material that are not administered by the 

Administration; and 

‘‘(B) written certification that such facilities meet the security standards and requirements of the Department of Energy. 

‘‘(2) If the Secretary is unable to make the certification 

described in paragraph (1)(B) with respect to a facility, the Secretary 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees, together with 

the matters required by paragraph (1), a corrective action plan 

describing— 

‘‘(A) the deficiency that resulted in the Secretary being 

unable to make the certification; 

‘‘(B) the actions to be taken to correct the deficiency; and 

‘‘(C) timelines for taking such actions.’’. 
H. R. 3304—390 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for the 

Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by striking the item relating 

to section 4506 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 4506. Annual report and certification on status of security of atomic energy 

defense facilities.’’. 

SEC. 3122. MODIFICATIONS TO ANNUAL REPORTS REGARDING THE 

CONDITION OF THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE. 

(a) REPORT ON ASSESSMENTS.—Subsection (e) of section 4205 

of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2525) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (3)— 

(A) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and 

inserting a semicolon; 

(B) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at 

the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(E) a concise summary of any significant finding investigations initiated or active during the previous year for 

which the head of the national security laboratory has 

full or partial responsibility.’’; and 

(2) by amending paragraph (4) to read as follows: 

‘‘(4) In the case of a report submitted by the Commander 

of the United States Strategic Command— 

‘‘(A) a discussion of the relative merits of other nuclear 

weapon types (if any), or compensatory measures (if any) 

that could be taken, that could enable accomplishment 

of the missions of the nuclear weapon types to which the 

assessments relate, should such assessments identify any 

deficiency with respect to such nuclear weapon types; and 

‘‘(B) a summary of all major assembly releases in place 

as of the date of the report for the active and inactive 

nuclear weapon stockpiles.’’. 

(b) REPORTS SUBMITTED TO THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS.— 

Subsection (f) of such section is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘March 1’’ and inserting 

‘‘February 1’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3) If the President does not forward to Congress the matters 

required under paragraph (2) by the date required by such paragraph, the officials specified in subsection (b) shall provide a briefing 

to the congressional defense committees not later than March 30 

on the report such officials submitted to the Secretary concerned 

under subsection (e).’’. 

SEC. 3123. INCLUSION OF INTEGRATED PLUTONIUM STRATEGY IN 

NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE STEWARDSHIP, MANAGEMENT, AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN. 

Section 4203(d) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 

2523(d)) is amended— 

(1) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and 

(2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new paragraph (6): 

‘‘(6) A strategy for the integrated management of plutonium 

for stockpile and stockpile stewardship needs over a 20-year 

period that includes the following: 
H. R. 3304—391 

‘‘(A) An assessment of the baseline science issues necessary to understand plutonium aging under static and 

dynamic conditions under manufactured and nonmanufactured plutonium geometries. 

‘‘(B) An assessment of scientific and testing 

instrumentation for plutonium at elemental and bulk conditions. 

‘‘(C) An assessment of manufacturing and handling 

technology for plutonium and plutonium components. 

‘‘(D) An assessment of computational models of plutonium performance under static and dynamic loading, 

including manufactured and nonmanufactured conditions. 

‘‘(E) An identification of any capability gaps with 

respect to the assessments described in subparagraphs (A) 

through (D). 

‘‘(F) An estimate of costs relating to the issues, 

instrumentation, technology, and models described in subparagraphs (A) through (D) over the period covered by 

the future-years nuclear security program under section 

3253 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act 

(50 U.S.C. 2453). 

‘‘(G) An estimate of the cost of eliminating the capability gaps identified under subparagraph (E) over the 

period covered by the future-years nuclear security program. 

‘‘(H) Such other items as the Administrator considers 

important for the integrated management of plutonium 

for stockpile and stockpile stewardship needs.’’. 

SEC. 3124. MODIFICATIONS TO COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES FOR COMPETITION OF MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTS. 

(a) ANALYSES OF BID PROTESTS.—Subsection (a) of section 3121 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

(Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2175) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(a) REPORTS REQUIRED.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 

described in subsection (b) by not later than 30 days after the 

later of— 

‘‘(1) the date on which the Administrator awards a contract 

to manage and operate a facility of the National Nuclear Security Administration; or 

‘‘(2) the date on which a protest concerning an alleged 

violation of a procurement statute or regulation brought under 

subchapter V of chapter 35 of title 31, United States Code, 

with respect to such a contract is resolved.’’. 

(b) REPORTING ON EXPECTED COST SAVINGS.—Subsection (b)(1) 

of such section is amended by inserting ‘‘, including a description 

of the assumptions used and analysis conducted to determine such 

expected cost savings’’ before the semicolon. 

(c) REVIEW BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED

STATES.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as 

follows: 

‘‘(c) REVIEW BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED

STATES.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), 

the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit 
H. R. 3304—392 

to the congressional defense committees a review of each report 

required by subsection (a) or (d)(2) not later than 180 days 

after the report is submitted to such committees. 

‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—The Comptroller General may not conduct 

a review under paragraph (1) of a report relating to a contract 

to manage and operate a facility of the National Nuclear Security Administration while a protest described in subsection 

(a)(2) is pending with respect to that contract.’’. 

(d) EXCEPTION FOR NAVAL REACTORS.—Subsection (d) of such 

section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3) NAVAL REACTORS.—The requirement for reports under 

subsections (a) and (d)(2) shall not apply with respect to a 

management and operations contract for a Naval Reactor 

facility.’’. 

SEC. 3125. MODIFICATION OF DEADLINES FOR CERTAIN REPORTS 

RELATING TO PROGRAM ON SCIENTIFIC ENGAGEMENT 

FOR NONPROLIFERATION. 

Section 3122 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2176; 50 U.S.C. 

2562 note) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting ‘‘, and to the Comptroller General of the United States,’’ after ‘‘the appropriate 

congressional committees’’; 

(2) in subsection (c)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘15’’ and inserting 

‘‘30’’; 

(B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); 

(C) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 

paragraph (3): 

‘‘(3) WAIVER.—The Administrator may waive the requirement under paragraph (1) to submit a report on a modification 

in the program under subsection (a) not later than 30 days 

before making the modification if the Administrator— 

‘‘(A) determines that the modification is urgent and 

necessary to the national security interests of the United 

States; and 

‘‘(B) not later than 30 days after making the modification, submits to the appropriate congressional committees— 

‘‘(i) the report on the modification required by paragraph (1); and 

‘‘(ii) a justification for exercising the waiver 

authority under this paragraph.’’; and 

(D) in paragraph (4), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(B), by striking ‘‘The report under paragraph (1)’’ and 

inserting ‘‘Each report submitted under paragraph (1) or 

(3)(B)’’; and 

(3) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ‘‘two years after the 

date of the enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘18 months 

after the date of the submittal of the report described in subsection (b)(1)’’. 

SEC. 3126. MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN REPORTS ON COST CONTAINMENT FOR URANIUM CAPABILITIES REPLACEMENT 

PROJECT. 

Section 3123(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2178) is amended— 
H. R. 3304—393 

(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘QUARTERLY’’; 

(2) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following 

new paragraph (1): 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United 

States shall submit to the congressional defense committees 

a report on the project referred to in subsection (a)— 

‘‘(A) not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and every 90 days thereafter through 

the date that is one year after such date of enactment; 

and 

‘‘(B) after the date that is one year after such date 

of enactment, at such times as the Comptroller General, 

in consultation with the congressional defense committees, 

determines appropriate, taking into consideration the critical decision points of the project (as defined in orders 

of the Department of Energy).’’; and 

(3) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘and the progress 

on meeting the requirements of section 4713 of the Atomic 

Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2753)’’; and 

(B) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘programmatic’’. 

SEC. 3127. PLAN FOR TANK FARM WASTE AT HANFORD NUCLEAR RESERVATION. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle D of title XLIV of the Atomic Energy 

Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2621 et seq.) is amended by adding at 

the end the following new section: 

‘‘SEC. 4445. PLAN FOR TANK FARM WASTE AT HANFORD NUCLEAR 

RESERVATION. 

‘‘(a) PLAN.—Not later than June 1, 2014, the Secretary of 

Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a 

plan for the initial activities (as defined in subsection (d)) for 

the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant and any related, 

required infrastructure facilities. 

‘‘(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The plan under subsection (a) shall 

include the following: 

‘‘(1) A list of significant requirements needed for the initial 

activities. 

‘‘(2) A schedule of significant activities needed to carry 

out the initial activities. 

‘‘(3) Actions required to accelerate, to the extent possible, 

the treatment of lower risk, low-activity waste while continuing 

efforts to resolve the technical challenges associated with higher 

risk, high-activity waste. 

‘‘(4) A description of how the Secretary will— 

‘‘(A) provide adequate protection to workers and the 

public under the plan; and 

‘‘(B) incorporate into the plan any significant new 

science and technical information that was not available 

before the development of the plan. 

‘‘(c) DETERMINATIONS.—(1) For each significant requirement 

identified by the Secretary under subsection (b)(1), the Secretary 

shall include in the plan submitted under subsection (a) a determination regarding whether such requirement is finalized and will 

be used to inform the initial activities. 

‘‘(2) For each significant requirement that the Secretary cannot 

make a finalized determination for under paragraph (1) by the 
H. R. 3304—394 

date on which the plan under subsection (a) is submitted to the 

congressional defense committees, the Secretary shall— 

‘‘(A) include in the plan— 

‘‘(i) a description of the requirement; 

‘‘(ii) a list of significant activities required to finalize 

the requirement; and 

‘‘(iii) the date on which the Secretary anticipates 

making such determination; and 

‘‘(B) once the Secretary makes a determination that such 

a significant requirement is finalized, submit to such committees notification that the requirement is finalized and will 

be used to inform the initial activities. 

‘‘(3)(A) Notwithstanding any determination made under paragraph (1) with respect to a significant requirement identified by 

the Secretary under subsection (b)(1)— 

‘‘(i) the Secretary shall change a requirement if necessary 

to provide adequate protection to workers and the public; and 

‘‘(ii) the Secretary may change a requirement if the Secretary determines such change is necessary. 

‘‘(B) If the Secretary authorizes a change to a requirement 

under subparagraph (A) that will have a significant material effect 

on the schedule or cost of the initial activities, the Secretary shall 

promptly notify the congressional defense committees of such 

change. 

‘‘(C) The authority of the Secretary under this paragraph may 

be delegated only to the Deputy Secretary of Energy. 

‘‘(d) INITIAL ACTIVITIES DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘initial activities’ means activities necessary to start the operations 

of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant at the Hanford 

Tank Farms of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, Richland, Washington, with respect to the design, construction, and operating of 

the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant and any related, 

required infrastructure facilities.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for the 

Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item 

relating to section 4444 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 4445. Plan for tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation.’’. 

SEC. 3128. PLAN FOR IMPROVEMENT AND INTEGRATION OF FINANCIAL 

MANAGEMENT OF NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall 

develop a plan for improving and integrating the financial management of the nuclear security enterprise. 

(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) An assessment of the expected results of the plan. 

(2) An assessment of the feasibility of the plan. 

(3) The estimated costs of carrying out the plan. 

(4) A timeline for implementation of the plan. 

(c) CONSIDERATIONS IN DEVELOPMENT OF PLAN.—In developing 

the plan required by subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider 

the following: 

(1) Efforts to improve the structure for the allocation of 

work to be used by the entities within the nuclear security 

enterprise for the activities carried out by those entities. 
H. R. 3304—395 

(2) Efforts to develop a clear and consistent cost structure 

for each program and entity within the nuclear security enterprise. 

(3) Methodologies for identifying costs for programs of 

record and base capabilities required for programs carried out 

by the nuclear security enterprise. 

(4) Mechanisms for monitoring those programs during the 

execution of those programs and to provide data to inform 

oversight of those programs. 

(5) Reporting frameworks to be used by the entities within 

the nuclear security enterprise to facilitate analyses, projections, and comparisons of similar activities carried out by different programs across the nuclear security enterprise. 

(6) Effects of the plan on the facilities and management 

and operating contractors of the nuclear security enterprise. 

(d) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—The Administrator shall submit 

the plan required by subsection (a) to the congressional defense 

committees not later than one year after the date of the enactment 

of this Act. 

(e) NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE DEFINED.—In this section, 

the term ‘‘nuclear security enterprise’’ has the meaning given that 

term in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 

2501). 

SEC. 3129. PLAN FOR DEVELOPING EXASCALE COMPUTING AND INCORPORATING SUCH COMPUTING INTO THE STOCKPILE 

STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM. 

(a) PLAN REQUIRED.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security 

shall develop and carry out a plan to develop exascale computing 

and incorporate such computing into the stockpile stewardship program under section 4201 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 

U.S.C. 2521) during the 10-year period beginning on the date of 

the enactment of this Act. 

(b) MILESTONES.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall 

include major programmatic milestones in— 

(1) the development of a prototype exascale computer for 

the stockpile stewardship program; and 

(2) mitigating disruptions resulting from the transition to 

exascale computing. 

(c) COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES.—In developing the 

plan required by subsection (a), the Administrator shall coordinate, 

as appropriate, with the Under Secretary of Energy for Science, 

the Secretary of Defense, and elements of the intelligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 

1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))). 

(d) INCLUSION OF COSTS IN FUTURE-YEARS NUCLEAR SECURITY

PROGRAM.—The Administrator shall— 

(1) address, in the estimated expenditures and proposed 

appropriations reflected in each future-years nuclear security 

program submitted under section 3253 of the National Nuclear 

Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2453) during the 10- 

year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the costs of— 

(A) developing exascale computing and incorporating 

such computing into the stockpile stewardship program; 

and 
H. R. 3304—396 

(B) mitigating potential disruptions resulting from the 

transition to exascale computing; and 

(2) include in each such future-years nuclear security program a description of the costs of efforts to develop exascale 

computing borne by the National Nuclear Security Administration, the Office of Science of the Department of Energy, other 

Federal agencies, and private industry. 

(e) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—The Administrator shall submit 

the plan required by subsection (a) to the congressional defense 

committees with each summary of the plan required by subsection 

(a) of section 4203 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 

2523) submitted under subsection (b)(1) of that section during the 

10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 

Act. 

(f) EXASCALE COMPUTING DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘‘exascale computing’’ means computing through the use of a computing machine that performs near or above 10 to the 18th power 

floating point operations per second. 

SEC. 3130. STUDY AND PLAN FOR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PILOT PROGRAM PRINCIPLES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall 

conduct a study of the feasibility of, and develop a plan for, 

extending the principles of the pilot program to improve and streamline oversight of the Kansas City Plant, Kansas City, Missouri, 

initiated on or about April 2006, to additional facilities of the 

nuclear security enterprise. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The study and plan required by subsection 

(a) shall address the following: 

(1) The applicability of all or some of the principles of 

the pilot program to additional facilities of the nuclear security 

enterprise. 

(2) The costs, benefits, risks, opportunities, and cost 

avoidances that may result from the extension of the principles 

of the pilot program to additional facilities. 

(3) The cost avoidances that have been realized from the 

pilot program described in subsection (a) since the pilot program 

was initiated. 

(4) The actions and timelines that would be required to 

extend the principles of the pilot program to additional facilities 

if the Administrator determines that extending such principles 

is feasible. 

(c) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to 

the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes 

the following: 

(1) The results of the study and the plan required by 

subsection (a). 

(2) The determination of the Administrator regarding 

whether the principles of the pilot program will be extended 

to additional facilities of the nuclear security enterprise. 

(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means 

the following: 

(A) The congressional defense committees. 
H. R. 3304—397 

(B) The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

of the House of Representatives. 

(2) The term ‘‘nuclear security enterprise’’ has the meaning 

given that term in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense 

Act (50 U.S.C. 2501). 

(3) The term ‘‘principles of the pilot program’’ means the 

principles regarding the use of third-party certification, industrial standards, best business practices, and verification of 

internal procedures and performance to improve and streamline 

oversight, as demonstrated in the pilot program at the Kansas 

City Plant described in subsection (a). 

SEC. 3131. STUDY OF POTENTIAL REUSE OF NUCLEAR WEAPON 

SECONDARIES. 

(a) STUDY.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall 

conduct a study of the potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries 

that includes an assessment of the potential for reusing secondaries 

in future life extension programs, including— 

(1) a description of which secondaries could be reused; 

(2) the number of such secondaries available in the stockpile as of the date of the study; and 

(3) the number of such secondaries that are planned to 

be available after such date as a result of the dismantlement 

of nuclear weapons. 

(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The study under subsection (a) shall 

include the following: 

(1) The feasibility and practicability of potential full or 

partial reuse options with respect to nuclear weapon 

secondaries. 

(2) The benefits and risks of reusing such secondaries. 

(3) A list of technical challenges that must be resolved 

to certify aged materials under dynamic loading conditions 

and the full stockpile-to-target sequence of weapons, including 

a program plan and timeline for resolving such technical challenges and an assessment of the importance of resolving outstanding materials issues on certifying aged secondaries. 

(4) The potential costs and cost savings of such reuse. 

(5) The effects of such reuse on the requirements for 

secondaries manufacturing. 

(6) An assessment of how such reuse affects plans to build 

a responsive nuclear weapons infrastructure. 

(c) SUBMISSION.—Not later than March 1, 2014, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees the 

study under subsection (a). 

SEC. 3132. REPEAL OF CERTAIN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

(a) REPORT ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY PRACTICES

AT NATIONAL SECURITY LABORATORIES.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 4507 of the Atomic Energy 

Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2658) is repealed. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for the 

Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by striking the item 

relating to section 4507. 

(b) REPORTS ON ADVANCED SUPERCOMPUTER SALES TO CERTAIN

FOREIGN NATIONS.—Section 3157 of the National Defense 
H. R. 3304—398 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 50 

U.S.C. App. 2404 note) is repealed. 

Subtitle D—Other Matters 

SEC. 3141. CLARIFICATION OF ROLE OF SECRETARY OF ENERGY. 

The amendment made by section 3113 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 

Stat. 2169) to section 4102 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act 

(50 U.S.C. 2512) may not be construed as affecting the authority 

of the Secretary of Energy, in carrying out national security programs, with respect to the management, planning, and oversight 

of the National Nuclear Security Administration or as affecting 

the delegation by the Secretary of authority to carry out such 

activities, as set forth under subsection (a) of such section 4102 

as it existed before the amendment made by such section 3113. 

SEC. 3142. MODIFICATION OF DEADLINES FOR CONGRESSIONAL 

ADVISORY PANEL ON THE GOVERNANCE OF THE 

NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE. 

Section 3166 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2208) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (d)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘March 

1, 2014’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘February 1, 2014’’ 

and inserting ‘‘July 1, 2014’’; and 

(2) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘June 1, 2014’’ and 

inserting ‘‘September 30, 2014’’. 

SEC. 3143. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LAND CONVEYANCE. 

(a) CONSOLIDATION OF TITLE TO BANNISTER FEDERAL COM- PLEX.—Notwithstanding sections 521 and 522 of title 40, United 

States Code, the Administrator of General Services may transfer 

custody of and accountability for the portion of the real property 

described in subsection (b) in the custody of the General Services 

Administration on the date of the enactment of this Act to the 

National Nuclear Security Administration. 

(b) REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The real property described in this subsection is the real property, including any improvements 

thereon, consisting of the Bannister Federal Complex in Kansas 

City, Missouri. 

(2) FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage 

and legal description of the real property described in this 

subsection shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the 

Administrator for Nuclear Security and the Administrator of 

General Services. 

(c) AUTHORITIES RELATING TO CONVEYANCE OF BANNISTER FEDERAL COMPLEX.—After the consolidation of custody of and accountability for the real property described in subsection (b) in the 

National Nuclear Security Administration under subsection (a), the 

Administrator for Nuclear Security may— 

(1) negotiate an agreement to convey to an eligible entity 

all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to 

the real property described in subsection (b); and 
H. R. 3304—399 

(2) enter into an agreement, on a reimbursable basis or 

otherwise, with the eligible entity to provide funding for the 

costs of— 

(A) the negotiation of the agreement described in paragraph (1); 

(B) planning for the disposition of the property; and 

(C) carrying out the responsibilities of the Administrator under section 120(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 

(42 U.S.C. 9620(h)) with respect to the property, 

including— 

(i) identification, investigation, and clean up of, 

and research and development with respect to, 

contamination from a hazardous substance or pollutant 

or contaminant; 

(ii) correction of other environmental damage that 

creates an imminent and substantial endangerment 

to the public health or welfare or to the environment; 

and 

(iii) demolition and removal of buildings and structures as required to clean up contamination or as 

required for completion of the responsibilities of the 

Administrator under that section. 

(d) LIMITATIONS.— 

(1) PRICE.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall 

select, through a public process provided for under the regulations of the Department of Energy, the eligible entity to which 

the real property described in subsection (b) is to be conveyed 

under subsection (c). The Administrator shall use good faith 

efforts to ensure the greatest possible return on such conveyance considering the conditions described in paragraphs (2) 

and (3). 

(2) CONDITION ON CONVEYANCE.—The conveyance under 

subsection (c) shall be subject to the requirements relating 

to transfer of property by the Federal Government under section 

120(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9620(h)). 

(3) OCCUPANCY BY NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC

ADMINISTRATION.—The conveyance under subsection (c) shall 

be subject to the condition that the National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration may continue to occupy until 

December 31, 2015, the space in the real property described 

in subsection (b) that the Administration occupies as of the 

date of the enactment of this Act. 

(e) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— 

(1) REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.—The 

Administrator for Nuclear Security shall use any funds received 

from the conveyance under subsection (c) to reimburse the 

Administrator for costs (other than costs referred to in paragraph (2) of that subsection) incurred by the Administrator 

to carry out the conveyance, including survey costs, costs for 

environmental documentation, and any other administrative 

costs related to the conveyance. 

(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received 

as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to 

the fund or account that was used to cover the costs referred 

to in that paragraph. Amounts so credited shall be merged 
H. R. 3304—400 

with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available 

for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions 

and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account. 

(f) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Administrator 

for Nuclear Security may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (c) as 

the Administrator considers appropriate to protect the interests 

of the United States. 

(g) ELIGIBLE ENTITY DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘‘eligible entity’’ means a nongovernmental entity that has demonstrated to the Administrator for Nuclear Security, in the Administrator’s sole discretion, that the entity has the capability to operate 

and maintain the real property described in subsection (b). 

SEC. 3144. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF 1954. 

Chapter 10 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2131 

et seq.), as amended by section 3176 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 

Stat. 2215), is amended in the matter following section 111 by 

inserting before ‘‘a. The Commission’’ the following: ‘‘Sec. 112. 

DOMESTIC MEDICAL ISOTOPE PRODUCTION.—’’. 

SEC. 3145. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE NATIONAL NUCLEAR 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ACT. 

(a) ADMINISTRATOR FOR NUCLEAR SECURITY.—Section 3212(c) 

of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 

2402(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘section 16(3) of the Office of 

Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3))’’ and inserting 

‘‘section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code’’. 

(b) STATUS OF ADMINISTRATION AND CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL.— Section 3220 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2410) is amended in subsection 

(a)(1)(A) and subsection (b) by inserting ‘‘(42 U.S.C. 7132(c)(3))’’ 

after ‘‘section 202(c)(3) of the Department of Energy Organization 

Act’’. 

(c) GOVERNMENT ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND COMPUTERS.— Section 3235(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2425(b)) is amended by 

inserting ‘‘(Public Law 99–508; 100 Stat. 1848)’’ after ‘‘of 1986’’. 

(d) AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH CERTAIN POSITIONS.—Section 

3241 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2441) is amended in the last sentence— 

(1) by striking ‘‘excepted positions established’’ and 

inserting ‘‘positions established’’; 

(2) by striking ‘‘an excepted position’’ and inserting ‘‘a 

position’’; and 

(3) by striking ‘‘nonexcepted position’’ and inserting ‘‘position not established under this section’’. 

(e) SEPARATE TREATMENT IN BUDGET.—Section 3251(a) of such 

Act (50 U.S.C. 2451(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘the Congress’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Congress’’. 

(f) FUTURE-YEARS NUCLEAR SECURITY PROGRAM.—Section 

3253(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2453(b)) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘five-fiscal year’’ each place it appears and 

inserting ‘‘five-fiscal-year’’; 

(2) by striking paragraph (5) and by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (5); and 

(3) in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (5), as redesignated 

by paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘National Nuclear Security’’. 

(g) COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION.— 

Section 3262 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2462) is amended by striking 
H. R. 3304—401 

‘‘the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 401 et 

seq.)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1303(a)(1) of title 41, United States 

Code’’. 

(h) USE OF CAPABILITIES OF NATIONAL SECURITY LABORATORIES.—Section 3264 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2464) is amended 

by inserting ‘‘of Energy’’ after ‘‘Secretary’’. 

(i) DEFINITIONS.—Section 3281(2)(F) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2471(2)(F)) is amended by striking ‘‘the Congress’’ and inserting 

‘‘Congress’’. 

(j) FUNCTIONS TRANSFERRED.—Section 3291(d)(1) of such Act 

(50 U.S.C. 2481(d)(1)) is amended by moving the flush text after 

subparagraph (B) 2 ems to the left. 

SEC. 3146. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE ATOMIC ENERGY 

DEFENSE ACT. 

(a) DEFINITIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 4002 of the Atomic Energy 

Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501) is amended— 

(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 

‘‘In this division’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as otherwise provided, in this division’’; 

(B) by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), (7), and (8) 

as paragraphs (6), (7), (9), and (10), respectively; 

(C) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new 

paragraph (5): 

‘‘(5) The terms ‘defense nuclear facility’ and ‘Department 

of Energy defense nuclear facility’ have the meaning given 

the term ‘Department of Energy defense nuclear facility’ in 

section 318 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 

2286g).’’; 

(D) by inserting after paragraph (7), as redesignated 

by subparagraph (B), the following new paragraph (8): 

‘‘(8) The term ‘Nuclear Weapons Council’ means the 

Nuclear Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 

10, United States Code.’’; and 

(E) in paragraph (10), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(B), by striking ‘‘restricted data’’ and inserting ‘‘Restricted 

Data’’. 

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

(A) NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE STEWARDSHIP

PLAN.—Section 4203(e)(1) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(e)(1)) 

is amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by 

striking ‘‘established by section 179 of title 10, United 

States Code,’’. 

(B) REPORTS ON LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAMS.—Section 

4216(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2536(a)) is amended in 

the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘established 

by section 179 of title 10, United States Code,’’. 

(C) SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORTS.—Section 

4217(b)(1) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2537(b)(1)) is amended 

in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by striking 

‘‘established under section 179 of title 10, United States 

Code,’’. 

(D) ADVICE ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE.—Section 

4218 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2538) is amended— 

(i) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘Joint’’; and 
H. R. 3304—402 

(ii) in subsection (f)(1), in the matter preceding 

subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘established under section 179 of title 10, United States Code’’. 

(E) REPORTS ON PERMANENT CLOSURES OF DEFENSE

NUCLEAR FACILITIES.—Section 4422(a) of such Act (50 

U.S.C. 2602(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘(as defined in 

section 318 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 

2286(g))’’. 

(F) PROHIBITION ON INTERNATIONAL INSPECTIONS.—Section 4501(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2651(a)) is amended 

by striking ‘‘restricted data’’ and inserting ‘‘Restricted 

Data’’. 

(G) REVIEW OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BEFORE DECLASSIFICATION AND RELEASE.—Section 4521 of such Act (50 

U.S.C. 2671) is amended by striking ‘‘restricted data’’ each 

place it appears and inserting ‘‘Restricted Data’’. 

(H) PROTECTION AGAINST INADVERTENT RELEASE OF

RESTRICTED DATA AND FORMERLY RESTRICTED DATA.—Section 4522 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2672) is amended by 

striking subsection (g). 

(I) DEFINITIONS.—Section 4701 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2741) is amended— 

(i) by striking paragraph (2); and 

(ii) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph 

(2). 

(J) PROHIBITION AND REPORT ON BONUSES TO CONTRAC- TORS.—Section 4802 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2782) is 

amended— 

(i) by striking subsection (b); and 

(ii) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection 

(b). 

(K) TRANSFERS OF REAL PROPERTY.—Section 4831(f) of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2811(f)) is amended by striking ‘‘section:’’ and all that follows through ‘‘(2) The terms’’ and 

inserting ‘‘section, the terms’’. 

(b) RESTRICTION ON CERTAIN LICENSING REQUIREMENT.—Section 4103 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2513) is amended by inserting 

‘‘; 94 Stat. 3197’’ after ‘‘Public Law 96–540’’. 

(c) NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE MATTERS.— 

(1) STOCKPILE STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM.—Section 4201 of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2521) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph 

(1), by striking ‘‘for Nuclear Security’’; and 

(B) in subsection (b)— 

(i) in paragraph (4)(D), by striking ‘‘Nevada 

national security site’’ and inserting ‘‘Nevada National 

Security Site’’; and 

(ii) in paragraph (5)— 

(I) by striking subparagraphs (A) through (D) 

and inserting the following new subparagraph (A): 

‘‘(A) the nuclear weapons production facilities; and’’; 

and 

(II) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as 

subparagraph (B). 

(2) STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.—Section 4204(a) of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2524(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘for Nuclear 

Security’’. 
H. R. 3304—403 

(3) ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE.—Section 4205 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2525) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (c), in the matter preceding paragraph 

(1), by striking ‘‘for Nuclear Security’’; and 

(B) in subsection (h)— 

(i) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘DEFINITIONS’’ and inserting ‘‘DEFINITION’’; 

(ii) by striking ‘‘section:’’ and all that follows 

through ‘‘(2) The term’’ and inserting ‘‘section, the 

term’’; and 

(iii) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) 

as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively, and by moving 

such paragraphs, as so redesignated, 2 ems to the 

left. 

(4) NUCLEAR TEST BAN READINESS PROGRAM.—Section 4207 

of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2527) is amended— 

(A) by striking subsection (a); 

(B) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), and (d) as 

subsections (a), (b), and (c), respectively; 

(C) in subsection (a), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(B), by striking ‘‘Soviet Union’’ and inserting ‘‘Russian Federation’’; 

(D) in subsection (b), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(B), by striking ‘‘subsection (b)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection 

(a)’’; and 

(E) in subsection (c), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(B)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘subsection (b)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘national nuclear weapons laboratories’’ and inserting ‘‘national security laboratories’’. 

(5) REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC REQUEST FOR NEW OR

MODIFIED NUCLEAR WEAPONS.—Section 4209(d) of such Act (50 

U.S.C. 2529(d)) is amended by striking ‘‘the date of the enactment of this Act’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘December 

2, 2002’’. 

(6) MANUFACTURING INFRASTRUCTURE.—Section 4212 of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2532) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ‘‘Review’’ and 

inserting ‘‘Memorandum’’; and 

(B) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘the Congress’’ and 

inserting ‘‘Congress’’. 

(7) REPORTS ON CRITICAL DIFFICULTIES.—Section 4213 of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2533) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (a)— 

(i) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘PLANTS’’ 

and inserting ‘‘FACILITIES’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘plant’’ each place it appears and 

inserting ‘‘facility’’; and 

(B) in subsection (d)— 

(i) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘CERTIFI- CATION’’ and inserting ‘‘ASSESSMENT’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘included with the decision documents’’ and all that follows through ‘‘the President’’ 

and inserting ‘‘submitted to the President and Congress 

with the matters required to be submitted under section 4205(f)’’. 
H. R. 3304—404 

(8) PLAN FOR TRANSFORMATION OF NUCLEAR SECURITY

ENTERPRISE.— 

(A) REPEAL.—Section 4214 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2534) 

is repealed. 

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 

such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 

4214. 

(9) REPLACEMENT PROJECT FOR CHEMISTRY AND METALLURGY RESEARCH BUILDING.—Section 4215(d)(2) of such Act (50 

U.S.C. 2535(d)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘National Nuclear 

Security’’. 

(10) ADVICE ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE.—Section 

4218 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2538), as amended by subsection 

(a)(2)(D), is further amended— 

(A) by striking subsection (a); 

(B) by redesignating subsections (b) through (g) as 

subsections (a) through (f), respectively; and 

(C) in subsection (d), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(B), by striking ‘‘(under section 3159 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public 

Law 104–201; 42 U.S.C. 7274o))’’ and inserting ‘‘under section 4213’’. 

(11) TRITIUM PRODUCTION PROGRAM.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 4233 of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2543) is— 

(i) transferred to the end of section 4231 (50 U.S.C. 

2541); and 

(ii) redesignated as subsection (c). 

(B) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 4233 of such Act 

(50 U.S.C. 2543) is repealed. 

(C) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 

such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 

4233. 

(d) PROLIFERATION MATTERS.— 

(1) NONPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES AND ACTIVITIES.— 

(A) REPEAL.—Section 4302 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2562) 

is repealed. 

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 

such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 

4302. 

(2) NUCLEAR CITIES INITIATIVE.— 

(A) REPEAL.—Section 4304 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2564) 

is repealed. 

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 

such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 

4304. 

(e) DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.— 

(1) DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP ACCOUNT.—Section 

4401 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2581) is amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘RESTORATION

AND WASTE MANAGEMENT’’ and inserting ‘‘CLEANUP’’; 

(B) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Restoration and 

Waste Management’’ and inserting ‘‘Cleanup’’; and 

(C) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and waste management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense 

environmental cleanup’’. 
H. R. 3304—405 

(2) FUTURE USE PLANS FOR DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL

CLEANUP.—Section 4402 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2582) is 

amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM’’ and inserting ‘‘DEFENSE

ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP’’; 

(B) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and waste management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense 

environmental cleanup’’; 

(C) in subsection (b)— 

(i) by striking paragraph (2); and 

(ii) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as 

paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively; 

(D) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ‘‘for program direction in carrying out environmental restoration and waste 

management’’ and inserting ‘‘for defense environmental 

cleanup’’; 

(E) by striking subsection (f); 

(F) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and 

(G) in paragraph (2) of subsection (g), as redesignated 

by subparagraph (F)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘an environmental restoration or 

waste management’’ and inserting ‘‘a defense environmental cleanup’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and 

waste management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup’’. 

(3) FUTURE-YEARS DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP

PLAN.—Section 4402A of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2582A) is 

amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘MANAGEMENT’’ 

and inserting ‘‘CLEANUP’’; 

(B) in subsection (a)— 

(i) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 

striking ‘‘management’’ and inserting ‘‘cleanup’’; and 

(ii) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘environmental 

management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental 

cleanup’’; and 

(C) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘management’’ each 

place it appears and inserting ‘‘cleanup’’. 

(4) INTEGRATED FISSILE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN.— 

Section 4403 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2583) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (a)(1)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘the Office of Fissile Materials Disposition, the Office of Nuclear Energy, and the Office 

of Defense Programs’’ and inserting ‘‘the Office of 

Nuclear Energy, and the Administration’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘storage’’ and inserting ‘‘storage,’’; 

and 

(B) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘March 31, 2000’’ 

and inserting ‘‘March 31, 2014’’. 

(5) BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REPORTS.—Section 4404 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2584) is repealed. 

(6) ACCELERATED SCHEDULE FOR DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL

CLEANUP ACTIVITIES.—Section 4405 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2585) 

is amended— 
H. R. 3304—406 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND WASTE MANAGEMENT’’ and 

inserting ‘‘DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP’’; 

(B) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and waste management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense 

environmental cleanup’’; 

(C) in subsection (b)— 

(i) by striking paragraph (2); and 

(ii) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) 

as paragraphs (2), (3), and (4), respectively; 

(D) by striking subsection (c); 

(E) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c); 

and 

(F) in subsection (c), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(E)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration or waste 

management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental 

cleanup’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and 

waste management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup’’. 

(7) DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM.—Section 4406 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2586) is amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘WASTE’’ and 

inserting ‘‘ENVIRONMENTAL’’; 

(B) by striking subsections (b) and (c); and 

(C) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (b). 

(8) REPORT ON DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP EXPENDITURES.—Section 4407 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2587) is amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘ENVIRON- MENTAL RESTORATION’’ and inserting ‘‘DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and waste 

management funds for defense activities’’ and inserting 

‘‘defense environmental cleanup funds’’. 

(9) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN PLANNING FOR DEFENSE

ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.—Section 4408 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2588) is amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘ENVIRON- MENTAL RESTORATION AND WASTE MANAGEMENT AT

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES’’ and inserting ‘‘DEFENSE

ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘Attorneys General’’ and inserting 

‘‘attorneys general’’; and 

(C) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and waste 

management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental 

cleanup activities’’. 

(10) PROJECTS TO ACCELERATE CLOSURE ACTIVITIES.—Section 4421 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2601) is repealed. 

(11) REPORTS IN CONNECTION WITH CLOSURES.—Section 

4422 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2602) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (a), as amended by subsection 

(a)(2)(E)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘must’’ and inserting ‘‘shall’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘environmental remediation and 

cleanup’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental 

cleanup’’; and 
H. R. 3304—407 

(B) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and other remediation and cleanup efforts’’ and 

inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup activities’’. 

(12) DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRIVATIZATION

PROJECTS.—Subtitle C of title XLIV of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2611) is repealed. 

(13) HANFORD WASTE TANK CLEANUP PROGRAM.—Section 

4442(b)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2622(b)(2)) is amended by 

striking ‘‘responsible for’’ and all that follows through ‘‘aspects’’ 

and inserting ‘‘responsible for managing all aspects’’. 

(14) FUNDING FOR TERMINATION COSTS OF RIVER PROTECTION PROJECT.—Section 4444(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2624(2)) 

is amended by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and waste 

management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup’’. 

(15) SAVANNAH RIVER SITE.—Subtitle E of title XLIV of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2631 et seq.) is amended by striking sections 4453A, 4453B, 4453C, and 4453D. 

(16) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Title XLIV of such Act 

(50 U.S.C. 2581 et seq.) is amended— 

(A) in the title heading, by striking ‘‘ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND WASTE MANAGEMENT’’ and inserting ‘‘DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL 

CLEANUP’’; 

(B) in the subtitle heading for subtitle A, by striking 

‘‘Environmental Restoration and Waste Management’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Defense Environmental Cleanup’’; and 

(C) by redesignating subtitles D and E as subtitles 

C and D, respectively. 

(17) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for such 

Act is amended by striking the items relating to title XLIV 

and inserting the following new items: 

‘‘TITLE XLIV—DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP MATTERS 

‘‘Subtitle A—Defense Environmental Cleanup 

‘‘Sec. 4401. Defense Environmental Cleanup Account. 

‘‘Sec. 4402. Requirement to develop future use plans for defense environmental 

cleanup. 

‘‘Sec. 4402A. Future-years defense environmental cleanup plan. 

‘‘Sec. 4403. Integrated fissile materials management plan. 

‘‘Sec. 4405. Accelerated schedule for defense environmental cleanup activities. 

‘‘Sec. 4406. Defense environmental cleanup technology program. 

‘‘Sec. 4407. Report on defense environmental cleanup expenditures. 

‘‘Sec. 4408. Public participation in planning for defense environmental cleanup. 

‘‘Subtitle B—Closure of Facilities 

‘‘Sec. 4422. Reports in connection with permanent closures of Department of Energy defense nuclear facilities. 

‘‘Subtitle C—Hanford Reservation, Washington 

‘‘Sec. 4441. Safety measures for waste tanks at Hanford nuclear reservation. 

‘‘Sec. 4442. Hanford waste tank cleanup program reforms. 

‘‘Sec. 4443. River Protection Project. 

‘‘Sec. 4444. Funding for termination costs of River Protection Project, Richland, 

Washington. 

‘‘Subtitle D—Savannah River Site, South Carolina 

‘‘Sec. 4451. Accelerated schedule for isolating high-level nuclear waste at the defense waste processing facility, Savannah River Site. 

‘‘Sec. 4452. Multi-year plan for clean-up. 

‘‘Sec. 4453. Continuation of processing, treatment, and disposal of legacy nuclear 

materials. 

‘‘Sec. 4454. Limitation on use of funds for decommissioning F–canyon facility.’’. 
H. R. 3304—408 

(f) SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY MATTERS.— 

(1) RESTRICTIONS ON ACCESS TO NATIONAL SECURITY LABORATORIES.—Section 4502 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2652) is 

amended— 

(A) by striking subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e); 

(B) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (b) and (c), respectively; and 

(C) in paragraph (2) of subsection (c), as redesignated 

by subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘as in effect on January 

1, 1999’’. 

(2) COUNTERINTELLIGENCE POLYGRAPH PROGRAM.—Section 

4504 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2654) is amended— 

(A) by striking subsection (d); and 

(B) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d). 

(3) NOTICE TO CONGRESS OF CERTAIN SECURITY AND

COUNTERINTELLIGENCE FAILURES.—Section 4505(e)(2) of such 

Act (50 U.S.C. 2656(e)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘the Congress’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Congress’’. 

(4) AMOUNTS FOR DECLASSIFICATION ACTIVITIES.—Section 

4525 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2675) is amended by striking 

subsection (c). 

(5) RESPONSIBILITY FOR DEFENSE PROGRAMS EMERGENCY

RESPONSE PROGRAM.— 

(A) REPEAL.—Subtitle C of title XLV of such Act (50 

U.S.C. 2691) is repealed. 

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 

such Act is amended by striking the items relating to 

subtitle C of title XLV. 

(g) PERSONNEL MATTERS.— 

(1) APPOINTMENT OF CERTAIN PERSONNEL.—Section 4601(a) 

of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2701(a)) is amended by striking paragraph (4). 

(2) WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION PROGRAM.—Section 4602 

of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2702) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (l), by striking ‘‘Public Law 101– 

512’’ and inserting ‘‘Public Law 101–12; 103 Stat. 16’’; 

and 

(B) by striking subsection (n). 

(3) INCENTIVES FOR EMPLOYEES AT CLOSURE PROJECT FACILITIES.— 

(A) REPEAL.—Section 4603 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2703) 

is repealed. 

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 

such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 

4603. 

(4) WORKFORCE RESTRUCTURING PLACE.—Section 4604 of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2704) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (c)(6)(A), by inserting ‘‘(29 U.S.C. 

2801 et seq.)’’ after ‘‘of 1998’’; and 

(B) in subsection (f)(1), by striking ‘‘the 236 H facility 

at Savannah River, South Carolina; and the Mound Laboratory, Ohio’’ and inserting ‘‘and the 236 H facility at 

Savannah River, South Carolina’’. 

(5) CERTIFICATES OF COMMENDATION.—Section 4605(b) of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2705(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘Cold 

War’’ and inserting ‘‘cold war’’. 
H. R. 3304—409 

(6) EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TRAINING.—Section 4621(b)(6) 

of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2721(b)(6)) is amended by striking 

‘‘environmental restoration and defense waste management’’ 

and inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup’’. 

(7) STOCKPILE STEWARDSHIP RECRUITMENT AND TRAINING

PROGRAM.—Section 4622 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2722) is 

amended— 

(A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Sandia’’ and all that 

follows through ‘‘Los Alamos National Laboratory’’ and 

inserting ‘‘national security laboratories’’; and 

(B) in subsections (b) and (c), by striking ‘‘laboratories 

referred to in subsection (a)(1)’’ each place it appears and 

inserting ‘‘national security laboratories’’. 

(8) FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM.—Section 4623(b) of such Act 

(50 U.S.C. 2723(b)) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by inserting ‘‘either of’’ after ‘‘who are’’. 

(9) WORKER PROTECTION.—Section 4641 of such Act (50 

U.S.C. 2731) is amended by striking subsection (e). 

(10) SAFETY OVERSIGHT AND ENFORCEMENT.—Section 4642 

of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2732) is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘(a) SAFETY AT DEFENSE NUCLEAR

FACILITIES.—’’; and 

(B) by striking subsection (b). 

(11) MONITORING WORKERS EXPOSED TO HAZARDOUS AND

RADIOACTIVE SUBSTANCES.—Section 4643 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2733) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘of Energy’’ after 

‘‘Secretary’’; and 

(B) in subsection (b)— 

(i) in paragraph (2)(B)— 

(I) by inserting ‘‘and Prevention’’ after ‘‘Disease Control’’; and 

(II) by striking the semicolon at the end and 

inserting a period; 

(ii) in paragraph (3)(C), by inserting ‘‘and Measurements’’ after ‘‘Radiation Protection’’; 

(iii) in paragraph (4)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)(D)’’ and inserting 

‘‘paragraph (1)(B)’’; and 

(II) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)(E)’’ and 

inserting ‘‘paragraph (1)’’; and 

(iv) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)(E)’’ 

and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1)’’. 

(12) PROGRAMS RELATING TO EXPOSURE ON HANFORD RESERVATION.—Section 4644(c) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2734(c)) is 

amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘the Congress’’ each place it appears 

and inserting ‘‘Congress’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (4), by inserting ‘‘and Prevention’’ 

after ‘‘Disease Control’’. 

(13) NOTIFICATION OF NUCLEAR CRITICALITY AND NONNUCLEAR INCIDENTS.—Section 4646(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2736(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘Energy and’’ and inserting 

‘‘Energy or’’. 

(h) BUDGET AND FINANCIAL MATTERS.— 
H. R. 3304—410 

(1) REPROGRAMMING.—Section 4702(c) of such Act (50 

U.S.C. 2742(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘subsection (a)’’ and 

insert ‘‘this subsection’’. 

(2) TRANSFER OF DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP

FUNDS.—Section 4710 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2750) is 

amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘MANAGEMENT’’ 

and inserting ‘‘CLEANUP’’; 

(B) in subsection (a)— 

(i) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘MANAGE- MENT’’ and inserting ‘‘CLEANUP’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘management’’ and inserting 

‘‘cleanup’’; and 

(C) in subsection (e)— 

(i) in paragraph (1)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration or 

waste management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense 

environmental cleanup’’; and 

(II) by striking ‘‘environmental management’’ 

and inserting ‘‘environmental cleanup’’; and 

(ii) in paragraph (2)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘environmental management’’ 

and inserting ‘‘environmental cleanup’’; and 

(II) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and 

waste management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense 

environmental cleanup’’. 

(3) TRANSFER OF WEAPONS ACTIVITIES FUNDS.—Section 

4711(d) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2751(d)) is amended by striking 

‘‘for Nuclear Security’’. 

(4) NOTIFICATION OF COST OVERRUNS.—Section 4713(a)(3) 

of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2753(a)(3)) is amended— 

(A) in the paragraph heading, by striking ‘‘MANAGE- MENT’’ and inserting ‘‘CLEANUP’’; and 

(B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘environmental 

management’’ and inserting ‘‘environmental cleanup’’. 

(5) USE OF FUNDS FOR PENALTIES UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL

LAWS.—Section 4721(b)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2761(b)(2)) 

is amended by striking ‘‘the Congress’’ and inserting ‘‘Congress’’. 

(6) RESTRICTION ON USE OF FUNDS TO PAY CERTAIN PEN- ALTIES.—Section 4722 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2762) is 

amended— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘; 94 Stat. 3197’’ after ‘‘Public Law 

96–540’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘the Congress’’ and inserting ‘‘Congress’’. 

(i) ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS.— (1) COSTS NOT ALLOWED UNDER COVERED CONTRACTS.—Section 4801(b)(1) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2781(b)(1)) is amended 

by striking ‘‘section 22 of the Office of Federal Procurement 

Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 418b)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1707 of 

title 41, United States Code’’. 

(2) CONTRACTOR LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN INJURIES OR LOSS

OF PROPERTY.—Section 4803(b)(1) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2783(b)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘by the Act of March 9, 

1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 741–752), or by the Act of March 3, 

1925 (46 U.S.C. App. 781–790)’’ and inserting ‘‘or by chapter 

309 or 311 of title 46, United States Code’’. 
H. R. 3304—411 

(3) USE OF FUNDS FOR LABORATORY-DIRECTED RESEARCH

AND DEVELOPMENT.—Section 4812 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2792) 

is amended— 

(A) by striking subsection (b); 

(B) by striking ‘‘GENERAL LIMITATIONS.—(1)’’ and 

inserting ‘‘LIMITATION ON USE OF WEAPONS ACTIVITIES

FUNDS.—’’; 

(C) by striking ‘‘(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘(b) LIMITATION ON

USE OF CERTAIN OTHER FUNDS.—’’; and 

(D) in subsection (b), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(C)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration, waste 

management, or nuclear materials and facilities stabilization’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental 

cleanup’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration mission, 

waste management mission, or materials stabilization 

mission, as the case may be,’’ and inserting ‘‘defense 

environmental cleanup mission’’. 

(4) REPORT ON LABORATORY-DIRECTED RESEARCH AND

DEVELOPMENT FUNDS.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 4812A of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2793) is amended— 

(i) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘LIMITATION’’ 

and inserting ‘‘REPORT’’; 

(ii) by striking subsection (a); 

(iii) by striking ‘‘(b) ANNUAL REPORT.—(1)’’ and 

inserting ‘‘(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—’’; 

(iv) by striking ‘‘(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘(b) PREPARA- TION OF REPORT.—’’; and 

(v) by striking ‘‘(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘(c) CRITERIA

USED IN PREPARATION OF REPORT.—’’. 

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 

such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 

4812A and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 4812A. Report on use of funds for certain research and development purposes.’’. 

(5) CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIPS.—Section 4813 of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2794) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘for Nuclear Security’’; and 

(B) in subsection (c)— 

(i) in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph (C) 

and inserting the following new subparagraph (C): 

‘‘(C) that is a defense critical technology (as defined 

in section 2500 of title 10, United States Code).’’; and 

(ii) in paragraph (3)(B)(iii), by striking ‘‘Governments’’ and inserting ‘‘governments’’. 

(6) CERTAIN TRANSFERS OF REAL PROPERTY.—Section 4831 

of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2811), as amended by subsection 

(a)(2)(K), is further amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘Secretary of Energy’’ each place it 

appears (other than in subsection (a)(1)) and inserting ‘‘Secretary’’; and 

(B) in subsection (d), in the subsection heading, by 

striking ‘‘OF ENERGY’’. 
H. R. 3304—412 

(7) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 4832 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2812) is amended in the section heading by striking ‘‘PLANT

MANAGERS OF CERTAIN NUCLEAR WEAPONS PRODUCTION

PLANTS’’ and inserting ‘‘MANAGERS OF CERTAIN NUCLEAR

WEAPONS PRODUCTION FACILITIES’’. 

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 

such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 

4832 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 4832. Engineering and manufacturing research, development, and demonstration by managers of certain nuclear weapons production facilities.’’. 

SEC. 3147. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON B61–12 LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAM. 

It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) the B61–12 life extension program must be a high 

priority of the National Nuclear Security Administration; 

(2) the B61–12 life extension program must be given top 

priority in the budget of the Administration and, if necessary, 

funding should be shifted from other programs of the Administration to ensure that the B61–12 life extension program stays 

on schedule to begin delivering B61–12 nuclear bombs to the 

military by not later than fiscal year 2020; and 

(3) further delays to the B61–12 life extension program 

would undermine the credibility and reliability of the nuclear 

deterrent of the United States and the assurances provided 

to allies of the United States. 

SEC. 3148. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ADVISORY 

BOARD ON TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND WORKER HEALTH. 

It is the sense of Congress that the President should establish 

an Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health, as 

described in the report of the Comptroller General of the United 

States titled ‘‘Energy Employees Compensation: Additional Independent Oversight and Transparency Would Improve Program’s 

Credibility’’, numbered GAO–10–302, to— 

(1) advise the President concerning the review and approval 

of the Department of Labor site exposure matrix; 

(2) conduct periodic peer reviews of, and approve, medical 

guidance for part E claims examiners with respect to the 

weighing of a claimant’s medical evidence; 

(3) obtain periodic expert review of evidentiary requirements for part B claims related to lung disease regardless 

of approval; 

(4) provide oversight over industrial hygienists, Department of Labor staff physicians, and Department of Labor’s 

consulting physicians and their reports to ensure quality, objectivity, and consistency; and 

(5) coordinate exchanges of data and findings with the 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (under section 

3624 the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation 

Program Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 7384o)) to the extent necessary. 
H. R. 3304—413 

TITLE XXXII—DEFENSE NUCLEAR 

FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD 

Sec. 3201. Authorization. 

SEC. 3201. AUTHORIZATION. 

There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014, 

$29,915,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities 

Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 

(42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq.). 

TITLE XXXIV—NAVAL PETROLEUM 

RESERVES 

Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations. 

SEC. 3401. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

(a) AMOUNT.—There are hereby authorized to be appropriated 

to the Secretary of Energy $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2014 for 

the purpose of carrying out activities under chapter 641 of title 

10, United States Code, relating to the naval petroleum reserves. 

(b) PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY.—Funds appropriated pursuant to 

the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) shall remain 

available until expended. 

TITLE XXXV—MARITIME 

ADMINISTRATION 

Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2014. 

Sec. 3502. 5-year reauthorization of vessel war risk insurance program. 

Sec. 3503. Sense of Congress. 

Sec. 3504. Treatment of funds for intermodal transportation maritime facility, Port 

of Anchorage, Alaska. 

Sec. 3505. Strategic seaports. 

SEC. 3501. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR NATIONAL 

SECURITY ASPECTS OF THE MERCHANT MARINE FOR 

FISCAL YEAR 2014. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014, to be available without fiscal year limitation if so provided 

in appropriations Acts, for the use of the Department of Transportation for Maritime Administration programs associated with 

maintaining national security aspects of the merchant marine, as 

follows: 

(1) For expenses necessary for operations of the United States Merchant Marine Academy, $81,268,000, of which— (A) $67,268,000 shall remain available until expended 

for Academy operations; and (B) $14,000,000 shall remain available until expended 

for capital asset management at the Academy. 

(2) For expenses necessary to support the State maritime academies, $17,100,000, of which— 

(A) $2,400,000 shall remain available until expended 

for student incentive payments; 
H. R. 3304—414 

(B) $3,600,000 shall remain available until expended 

for direct payments to such academies; and (C) $11,100,000 shall remain available until expended 

for maintenance and repair of State maritime academy 

training vessels. 

(3) For expenses necessary to dispose of vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet, $2,000,000, to remain available 

until expended. 

(4) For expenses to maintain and preserve a United Statesflag merchant marine to serve the national security needs 

of the United States under chapter 531 of title 46, United 

States Code, $186,000,000. 

(5) For the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the Federal 

Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5)) of loan guarantees 

under the program authorized by chapter 537 of title 46, United 

States Code, $72,655,000, of which $2,655,000 shall remain 

available until expended for administrative expenses of the 

program. 

SEC. 3502. 5-YEAR REAUTHORIZATION OF VESSEL WAR RISK INSURANCE PROGRAM. 

Section 53912 of title 46, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘December 31, 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2020’’. 

SEC. 3503. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

(1) It is in the interest of United States national security 

that the United States merchant marine, both ships and mariners, serve as a naval auxiliary in times of war or national 

emergency. 

(2) The readiness of the United States merchant fleet 

should be augmented by a Government-owned reserve fleet 

comprised of ships with national defense features that may 

not be available immediately in sufficient numbers or types 

in the active United States-owned, United States-flagged, and 

United States-crewed commercial industry. 

(3) The Ready Reserve Force of the Maritime Administration, a component of the National Defense Reserve Fleet, plays 

an important role in United States national security by providing necessary readiness and efficiency in the form of a 

Government-owned sealift fleet. 

(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) maintaining a United States shipbuilding base is critical 

to meeting United States national security requirements; 

(2) it is of vital importance that the Ready Reserve Force 

of the Maritime Administration remains capable, modern, and 

efficient in order to best serve the national security needs 

of the United States in times of war or national emergency; 

(3) Federal agencies must consider investment options for 

replacing aging vessels within the Ready Reserve Force to 

meet future operational commitments; 

(4) investment in recapitalizing the Ready Reserve Force 

may include— 

(A) construction of dual-use vessels, based on need, 

for use in the America’s Marine Highway Program of the 

Department of Transportation, as a recent study performed 

under a cooperative agreement between the Maritime 

Administration and the Navy demonstrated that dual-use 
H. R. 3304—415 

vessels transporting domestic freight between United 

States ports could be called upon to supplement sealift 

capacity; 

(B) construction of tanker vessels to meet military 

transport needs; and 

(C) construction of vessels for use in transporting 

potential new energy exports; and 

(5) the Department of Transportation, in consultation with 

the Navy, should pursue the most cost-effective means of recapitalizing the Ready Reserve Force, including by promoting the 

building of new vessels that are militarily useful and commercially viable. 

SEC. 3504. TREATMENT OF FUNDS FOR INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION MARITIME FACILITY, PORT OF ANCHORAGE, 

ALASKA. 

Section 10205 of Public Law 109–59 (119 Stat. 1934) is amended 

by striking ‘‘shall’’ and inserting ‘‘may’’. 

SEC. 3505. STRATEGIC SEAPORTS. 

(a) PRIORITY.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Under the port infrastructure development program established under section 50302(c) of title 46, 

United States Code, the Maritime Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, may give priority to providing funding to strategic seaports in support of national security requirements. 

(2) STRATEGIC SEAPORT DEFINED.—In this subsection the 

term ‘‘strategic seaport’’ means a military port or and commercial port that is subject to a port planning order or Basic 

Ordering Agreement (or both) that is projected to be used 

for the deployment of forces and shipment of ammunition or 

sustainment supplies in support of military operations. 

(b) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.—Section 50302(c)(2)(D) of title 46, 

United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘and financial assistance, including grants,’’ after ‘‘technical assistance’’. 

DIVISION D—FUNDING TABLES 

Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables. 

TITLE XLI—PROCUREMENT 

Sec. 4101. Procurement. 

Sec. 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLII—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation. 

Sec. 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLIII—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance. 

Sec. 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL 

Sec. 4401. Military personnel. 

Sec. 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

Sec. 4501. Other authorizations. 
H. R. 3304—416 

Sec. 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLVI—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 4601. Military construction. 

TITLE XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

Sec. 4701. Department of energy national security programs. 

SEC. 4001. AUTHORIZATION OF AMOUNTS IN FUNDING TABLES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Whenever a funding table in this division 

specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or 

activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified dollar 

amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby authorized, 

subject to the availability of appropriations. 

(b) MERIT-BASED DECISIONS.—A decision to commit, obligate, 

or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a 

dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall— 

(1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k) and 2374 of 

title 10, United States Code, or on competitive procedures; 

and 

(2) comply with other applicable provisions of law. 

(c) RELATIONSHIP TO TRANSFER AND PROGRAMMING

AUTHORITY.—An amount specified in the funding tables in this 

division may be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer 

or reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this 

Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount 

specified in such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling 

on such transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 

1522 of this Act or any other provision of law, unless such transfer 

or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation 

accounts. 

(d) APPLICABILITY TO CLASSIFIED ANNEX.—This section applies 

to any classified annex that accompanies this Act. 

(e) ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS.—No oral or written 

communication concerning any amount specified in the funding 

tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of this 

section. 

TITLE XLI—PROCUREMENT 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT. 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

FIXED WING 

001 UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT ................................................................. 19,730 19,730 

003 AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP) ...................................... 142,050 85,050 

Reduction of EMARSS LRIP aircraft ......................................... [–57,000 ] 

004 MQ–1 UAV .......................................................................................... 518,460 518,460 

005 RQ–11 (RAVEN) ................................................................................. 10,772 10,772 

ROTARY 

006 HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH) .......................................... 96,227 171,227 

Program increase for additional aircraft ................................... [75,000 ] 

007 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN ........................................... 608,469 608,469 

008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 150,931 150,931 

012 UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) ........................................ 1,046,976 1,032,915 

Transfer to PE 0203774A at Army request ............................... [–14,061 ] 
H. R. 3304—417 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

013 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 116,001 116,001 

014 CH–47 HELICOPTER ........................................................................ 801,650 801,650 

015 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 98,376 98,376 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

016 MQ–1 PAYLOAD—UAS ..................................................................... 97,781 97,781 

017 GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP) ............................................................... 10,262 10,262 

018 MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) ............................................. 12,467 12,467 

019 AH–64 MODS ..................................................................................... 53,559 53,559 

020 CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP) ................................. 149,764 149,764 

021 UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS .............................................. 17,500 17,500 

022 UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS ....................................................... 74,095 74,095 

023 KIOWA MODS WARRIOR ................................................................ 184,044 184,044 

024 NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN ................................................... 152,569 152,569 

025 COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE ...................................................... 92,779 92,779 

026 GATM ROLLUP .................................................................................. 65,613 65,613 

027 RQ–7 UAV MODS .............................................................................. 121,902 121,902 

GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS 

028 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT .................................. 47,610 47,610 

029 SURVIVABILITY CM ........................................................................ 5,700 5,700 

030 CMWS .................................................................................................. 126,869 126,869 

OTHER SUPPORT 

031 AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 6,809 6,809 

032 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT ................................................. 65,397 65,397 

033 AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS .............................................. 45,841 45,841 

034 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ................................................................. 79,692 79,692 

035 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ............................................................... 1,615 1,615 

036 LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET .............................................................. 2,877 2,877 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................ 5,024,387 5,028,326 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM 

002 MSE MISSILE .................................................................................... 540,401 540,401 

AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 

003 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY ............................................................. 4,464 4,464 

ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 

004 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY .................................... 110,510 110,510 

005 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY ............................................................ 49,354 49,354 

006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 19,965 19,965 

007 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) ................................................ 237,216 237,216 

008 MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) .......... 19,022 19,022 

MODIFICATIONS 

011 PATRIOT MODS ................................................................................ 256,438 256,438 

012 STINGER MODS ................................................................................ 37,252 37,252 

013 ITAS/TOW MODS ............................................................................... 20,000 20,000 

014 MLRS MODS ...................................................................................... 11,571 11,571 

015 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS .............................................................. 6,105 6,105 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

016 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 11,222 11,222 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

017 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS ................................................................. 3,530 3,530 

018 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES) ......................................... 1,748 1,748 

019 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT ...................................................... 5,285 5,285 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY .................... 1,334,083 1,334,083 

PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY 

TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

001 STRYKER VEHICLE ......................................................................... 374,100 374,100 

MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

002 STRYKER (MOD) ............................................................................... 20,522 20,522 

003 FIST VEHICLE (MOD) ...................................................................... 29,965 29,965 

004 BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) .......................................................... 158,000 158,000 

005 HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD) ........................ 4,769 4,769 

006 PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM) .......................... 260,177 219,477 

Transfer to PE 0604854A at Army Request .............................. [–40,700 ] 

007 IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES) ........... 111,031 186,031 

Program increase ......................................................................... [75,000 ] 

008 ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD) ............................................................... 2,500 2,500 
H. R. 3304—418 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

009 ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE ................................................... 62,951 62,951 

010 M88 FOV MODS ................................................................................. 28,469 28,469 

011 JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE ............................................................... 2,002 2,002 

012 M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) .............................................................. 178,100 178,100 

013 ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM ..................................................... 90,000 

Program increase ......................................................................... [90,000 ] 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

014 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV) .............................. 1,544 1,544 

WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 

015 INTEGRATED AIR BURST WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY ............ 69,147 0 

Transfer to PE 0604601A per Army’s request .......................... [–11,000 ] 

XM25 Counter Defilade Target Engagement ............................ [–58,147 ] 

018 MORTAR SYSTEMS .......................................................................... 5,310 5,310 

019 XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) ........................ 24,049 24,049 

021 CARBINE ............................................................................................ 70,846 21,254 

Individual Carbine program cancelation ................................... [–49,592 ] 

023 COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION ......... 56,580 56,580 

024 HANDGUN .......................................................................................... 300 300 

MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 

026 M777 MODS ........................................................................................ 39,300 39,300 

027 M4 CARBINE MODS ......................................................................... 10,300 10,300 

028 M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS ................................................ 33,691 33,691 

029 M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS ................................................ 7,608 7,608 

030 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS ........................................ 2,719 2,719 

031 SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS ................................................ 7,017 7,017 

032 M119 MODIFICATIONS .................................................................... 18,707 18,707 

033 M16 RIFLE MODS ............................................................................. 2,136 2,136 

034 MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) ................ 1,569 1,569 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

035 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) ................................... 2,024 2,024 

036 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV) .......................... 10,108 10,108 

037 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ...................................................... 459 459 

038 SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG) .................. 1,267 1,267 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY ............... 1,597,267 1,602,828 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY 

SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 

002 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................... 112,167 87,167 

Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction .................... [–25,000 ] 

003 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................... 58,571 53,571 

Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction .................... [–5,000 ] 

004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES ......................................................... 9,858 9,858 

005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES ............................................................... 80,037 55,037 

Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction .................... [–25,000 ] 

007 CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 16,496 6,196 

Program decrease ........................................................................ [–10,300 ] 

008 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 69,533 50,033 

Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction .................... [–19,500 ] 

009 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 55,781 55,781 

MORTAR AMMUNITION 

010 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .......................................................... 38,029 38,029 

011 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .......................................................... 24,656 24,656 

012 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES ........................................................ 60,781 60,781 

TANK AMMUNITION 

013 CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES .......... 121,551 121,551 

ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 

014 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES ........ 39,825 39,825 

015 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES ......................... 37,902 37,902 

016 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 ...................................... 67,896 67,896 

017 ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL ....... 71,205 71,205 

ROCKETS 

020 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................. 1,012 1,012 

021 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES .................................................. 108,476 108,476 

OTHER AMMUNITION 

022 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES ...................................... 24,074 24,074 

023 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ................................................................. 33,242 33,242 

024 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES ...................................................................... 7,609 7,609 
H. R. 3304—419 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

025 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES ............................................................. 5,228 5,228 

MISCELLANEOUS 

026 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES .............................................. 16,700 16,700 

027 NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES .................................. 7,366 7,366 

028 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES ....................................................................... 3,614 3,614 

029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO) ................................... 12,423 12,423 

030 AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT ...................................... 16,604 16,604 

031 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) .................. 14,328 14,328 

032 CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES ................................................................ 108 108 

PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 

033 PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .................................. 242,324 242,324 

034 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION ................ 179,605 179,605 

035 ARMS INITIATIVE ............................................................................ 3,436 3,436 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY .. 1,540,437 1,455,637 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

TACTICAL VEHICLES 

001 TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS .............................................. 4,000 4,000 

002 SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED: ............................................................ 6,841 6,841 

003 FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) .......................... 223,910 223,910 

004 FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP ............ 11,880 11,880 

005 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) ................... 14,731 14,731 

006 PLS ESP .............................................................................................. 44,252 44,252 

009 HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV ........ 39,525 39,525 

011 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS ............... 51,258 25,958 

Funding ahead of need ................................................................ [–25,300 ] 

012 MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP .............................................. 49,904 49,904 

013 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS ....... 2,200 2,200 

NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES 

014 HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN ............................................................. 400 400 

015 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ............................................ 716 716 

016 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER ............................................. 5,619 5,619 

COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS 

018 WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK .................... 973,477 973,477 

019 SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ........................................ 14,120 14,120 

020 JOINT INCIDENT SITE COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY ...... 7,869 7,869 

021 JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM) .................................................. 5,296 5,296 

COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 

022 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS ....... 147,212 147,212 

023 TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS.7,998 7,998 

024 SHF TERM .......................................................................................... 7,232 7,232 

025 NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE) ............... 3,308 3,308 

026 SMART-T (SPACE) ............................................................................. 13,992 13,992 

028 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS .......................................................... 28,206 28,206 

029 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT) ............................................... 2,778 2,778 

COMM—C3 SYSTEM 

031 ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL SYS (AGCCS) ....................... 17,590 17,590 

COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 

032 ARMY DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (DATA RADIO) ............. 786 786 

033 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM ................................................ 382,930 382,930 

034 MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR) ........... 19,200 19,200 

035 RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) .......................................... 1,438 1,438 

036 SINCGARS FAMILY .......................................................................... 9,856 9,856 

037 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS—OPA2 ....................................................... 14,184 14,184 

038 TRACTOR DESK ................................................................................ 6,271 6,271 

040 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS 1,030 1,030 

041 TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM 31,868 31,868 

042 UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE .......................................................... 18,000 18,000 

044 RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY ...................................... 1,166 1,166 

045 FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE ..... 22,867 22,867 

COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM 

048 CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE .............................................. 1,512 1,512 

049 ARMY CA/MISO GPF EQUIPMENT ................................................ 61,096 61,096 

INFORMATION SECURITY 

050 TSEC—ARMY KEY MGT SYS (AKMS) ........................................... 13,890 13,890 

051 INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP .............. 23,245 23,245 
H. R. 3304—420 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

052 BIOMETRICS ENTERPRISE ............................................................ 3,800 3,800 

053 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) ................................ 24,711 24,711 

COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS 

055 BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS ........................................... 43,395 43,395 

COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 

057 INFORMATION SYSTEMS ............................................................... 104,577 104,577 

058 DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS) ........................................... 612 612 

059 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 39,000 39,000 

060 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM ... 248,477 248,477 

ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 

064 JTT/CIBS-M ........................................................................................ 824 824 

065 PROPHET GROUND ......................................................................... 59,198 59,198 

067 DCGS-A (MIP) .................................................................................... 267,214 267,214 

068 JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS) .......................... 9,899 9,899 

069 TROJAN (MIP) ................................................................................... 24,598 24,598 

070 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) ................................ 1,927 1,927 

071 CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS) ................ 6,169 6,169 

072 MACHINE FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRANSLATION SYSTEM-M 2,924 2,924 

ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 

074 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR .............................. 40,735 40,735 

075 EW PLANNING & MANAGEMENT TOOLS (EWPMT) ................ 13 13 

076 ENEMY UAS ...................................................................................... 2,800 2,800 

079 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES 1,237 1,237 

080 CI MODERNIZATION ....................................................................... 1,399 1,399 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 

082 SENTINEL MODS ............................................................................. 47,983 47,983 

083 SENSE THROUGH THE WALL (STTW) ......................................... 142 142 

084 NIGHT VISION DEVICES ................................................................ 202,428 202,428 

085 LONG RANGE ADVANCED SCOUT SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 5,183 5,183 

086 NIGHT VISION, THERMAL WPN SIGHT ...................................... 14,074 14,074 

087 SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF ............. 22,300 22,300 

089 GREEN LASER INTERDICTION SYSTEM (GLIS) ....................... 1,016 1,016 

090 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS ............. 55,354 55,354 

091 ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP .................................................... 800 800 

092 PROFILER .......................................................................................... 3,027 3,027 

093 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS) ...................... 1,185 1,185 

094 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) ..................... 103,214 103,214 

096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR) ..................................................... 26,037 26,037 

097 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM .............................................. 23,100 23,100 

098 COUNTERFIRE RADARS ................................................................. 312,727 312,727 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 

101 FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY ............................................................ 43,228 43,228 

102 BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM ........ 14,446 14,446 

103 FAAD C2 ............................................................................................. 4,607 4,607 

104 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS ................ 33,090 33,090 

105 IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM ............................................. 21,200 21,200 

107 LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) ................................ 1,795 1,795 

109 NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE 54,327 54,327 

110 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) ....................................... 59,171 59,171 

111 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A) ........... 83,936 83,936 

113 LOGISTICS AUTOMATION .............................................................. 25,476 25,476 

114 RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET ..... 19,341 19,341 

ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION 

115 ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION ............................................ 11,865 11,865 

116 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP .................................. 219,431 219,431 

117 GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM .... 6,414 6,414 

118 HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP) .......................... 62,683 62,683 

120 RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS) ................ 34,951 34,951 

ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V) 

121 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (A/V) ..................................................... 7,440 7,440 

122 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) ............... 1,615 1,615 

ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT 

123 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E) ............................................ 554 554 

124 BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES ................................................ 20,000 20,000 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

124A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 3,558 3,558 

CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 
H. R. 3304—421 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

126 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) ....................... 762 762 

127 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) .................................................. 20,630 20,630 

128 CBRN DEFENSE ............................................................................... 22,151 22,151 

BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 

130 TACTICAL BRIDGING ...................................................................... 14,188 14,188 

131 TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON ........................................... 23,101 23,101 

132 COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER (CBT) RECAP ..................... 15,416 15,416 

ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 

134 GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS) .......... 50,465 50,465 

135 ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS) .......................... 6,490 6,490 

136 EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION ....................... 1,563 1,563 

137 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT) ... 20,921 20,921 

138 REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS ................................................ 100 100 

139 < $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT ........................................... 2,271 2,271 

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

140 HEATERS AND ECU’S ...................................................................... 7,269 7,269 

141 LAUNDRIES, SHOWERS AND LATRINES .................................... 200 200 

142 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT ............................................................. 1,468 1,468 

143 PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) ............... 26,526 26,526 

144 GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM .......................................................... 81,680 71,680 

Unjustified unit cost growth ....................................................... [–10,000 ] 

147 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 28,096 28,096 

148 CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM 56,150 56,150 

149 MORTUARY AFFAIRS SYSTEMS ................................................... 3,242 3,242 

150 FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS ...... 38,141 38,141 

151 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) .............................................. 5,859 5,859 

PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 

152 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER ................. 60,612 60,612 

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 

153 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL ....................................................... 22,042 22,042 

154 MEDEVAC MISSON EQUIPMENT PACKAGE (MEP) .................. 35,318 35,318 

MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 

155 MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS .................... 19,427 19,427 

156 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) ........................................ 3,860 3,860 

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 

157 GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE) ...................................... 2,000 2,000 

159 SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING .......................................................... 36,078 36,078 

160 MISSION MODULES—ENGINEERING ......................................... 9,721 9,721 

162 HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR .............................................................. 50,122 50,122 

163 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED ............................................................ 28,828 28,828 

164 ALL TERRAIN CRANES ................................................................... 19,863 19,863 

166 HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE) .................. 23,465 23,465 

168 ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPAP ......... 13,590 13,590 

169 CONST EQUIP ESP ........................................................................... 16,088 16,088 

170 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) ................................. 6,850 6,850 

RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT 

171 ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP .............................................................. 38,007 19,007 

Funding ahead of need ................................................................ [–19,000 ] 

172 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL) ..................................... 10,605 10,605 

GENERATORS 

173 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP ................................... 129,437 129,437 

MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

174 ROUGH TERRAIN CONTAINER HANDLER (RTCH) ................... 1,250 1,250 

175 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS .................................................................. 8,260 8,260 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

176 COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT ................................... 121,710 121,710 

177 TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM .............................................. 225,200 225,200 

178 CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER ......................................... 30,063 30,063 

179 AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER .................. 34,913 34,913 

180 GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING .. 9,955 9,955 

TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) 

181 CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT ................................................ 8,241 8,241 

182 INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) .............. 67,506 67,506 

183 TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) ....................... 18,755 18,755 

OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

184 M25 STABILIZED BINOCULAR ...................................................... 5,110 5,110 

185 RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............. 5,110 5,110 
H. R. 3304—422 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

186 PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) ..................................... 62,904 62,904 

187 BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT .......................................... 1,427 1,427 

188 MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3) .................... 96,661 96,661 

189 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH) .......................................... 2,450 2,450 

190 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING .............................. 11,593 11,593 

191 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA3 ......................................................... 8,948 8,948 

192 TRACTOR YARD ................................................................................ 8,000 8,000 

OPA2 

195 INITIAL SPARES—C&E ................................................................... 59,700 59,700 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY ...................... 6,465,218 6,410,918 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

COMBAT AIRCRAFT 

001 EA–18G ................................................................................................ 2,001,787 1,940,874 

Excess engineering change order funding ................................. [–8,790 ] 

GFE electronics cost growth ....................................................... [–5,943 ] 

Other GFE cost growth ............................................................... [–1,180 ] 

Program adjustment .................................................................... [–45,000 ] 

003 F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET ..................................................... 206,551 206,551 

004 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 75,000 

Program increase ......................................................................... [75,000 ] 

005 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV .......................................................... 1,135,444 1,135,444 

006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 94,766 94,766 

007 JSF STOVL ......................................................................................... 1,267,260 1,267,260 

008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 103,195 103,195 

009 V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) ....................................................................... 1,432,573 1,432,573 

010 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 55,196 55,196 

011 H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) ................................................... 749,962 749,962 

012 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 71,000 71,000 

013 MH–60S (MYP) ................................................................................... 383,831 383,831 

014 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 37,278 37,278 

015 MH–60R (MYP) ................................................................................... 599,237 599,237 

016 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 231,834 231,834 

017 P–8A POSEIDON ............................................................................... 3,189,989 3,189,989 

018 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 313,160 313,160 

019 E–2D ADV HAWKEYE ...................................................................... 997,107 997,107 

020 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 266,542 266,542 

TRAINER AIRCRAFT 

021 JPATS .................................................................................................. 249,080 249,080 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

022 KC–130J .............................................................................................. 134,358 134,358 

023 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 32,288 32,288 

025 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 52,002 4,802 

Advance procurement appropriated in fiscal year 2013 ........... [–47,200 ] 

026 MQ–8 UAV .......................................................................................... 60,980 60,980 

028 OTHER SUPPORT AIRCRAFT ......................................................... 14,958 14,958 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

029 EA–6 SERIES ..................................................................................... 18,577 18,577 

030 AEA SYSTEMS ................................................................................... 48,502 48,502 

031 AV–8 SERIES ..................................................................................... 41,575 41,575 

032 ADVERSARY ...................................................................................... 2,992 2,992 

033 F–18 SERIES ...................................................................................... 875,371 833,530 

ECP 6038 radome kits cost growth (OSIP 002–07) .................. [–2,952 ] 

Integrated logistics support growth (OSIP 14–03) ................... [–8,000 ] 

Other support and ILS ahead of need (OSIP 04–14) ............... [–20,989 ] 

Retrofit radars (APG–79B) cost growth (OSIP 002–07) ........... [–9,900 ] 

034 H–46 SERIES ...................................................................................... 2,127 2,127 

036 H–53 SERIES ...................................................................................... 67,675 67,675 

037 SH–60 SERIES ................................................................................... 135,054 135,054 

038 H–1 SERIES ........................................................................................ 41,706 41,706 

039 EP–3 SERIES ...................................................................................... 55,903 77,903 

12th aircraft to Spiral 3 .............................................................. [8,000 ] 

Sensor obsolescence ..................................................................... [14,000 ] 

040 P–3 SERIES ........................................................................................ 37,436 37,436 

041 E–2 SERIES ........................................................................................ 31,044 31,044 

042 TRAINER A/C SERIES ...................................................................... 43,720 40,520 

Avionics Obsolescence installation cost growth ........................ [–3,200 ] 
H. R. 3304—423 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

043 C–2A .................................................................................................... 902 902 

044 C–130 SERIES .................................................................................... 47,587 47,587 

045 FEWSG ................................................................................................ 665 665 

046 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES .................................................. 14,587 14,587 

047 E–6 SERIES ........................................................................................ 189,312 183,218 

FAB-T funding previously appropriated (OSIP 014–14) .......... [–6,094 ] 

048 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES ............................................ 85,537 85,537 

049 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT ...................................................... 3,684 13,684 

Program office sustainment ........................................................ [5,000 ] 

Sensor obsolescence ..................................................................... [5,000 ] 

050 T–45 SERIES ...................................................................................... 98,128 98,128 

051 POWER PLANT CHANGES .............................................................. 22,999 22,999 

052 JPATS SERIES ................................................................................... 1,576 1,576 

053 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS ................................................. 6,267 6,267 

054 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 141,685 141,685 

055 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES .................................................... 120,660 120,660 

056 COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM ................................. 3,554 3,554 

057 ID SYSTEMS ...................................................................................... 41,800 41,800 

058 P–8 SERIES ........................................................................................ 9,485 9,485 

059 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION ............................................................ 14,431 14,431 

060 MQ–8 SERIES .................................................................................... 1,001 1,001 

061 RQ–7 SERIES ..................................................................................... 26,433 26,433 

062 V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY ............................................... 160,834 160,834 

063 F–35 STOVL SERIES ........................................................................ 147,130 147,130 

064 F–35 CV SERIES ................................................................................ 31,100 31,100 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

065 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 1,142,461 1,142,461 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES 

066 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT ................................................. 410,044 410,044 

067 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .......................................... 27,450 27,450 

068 WAR CONSUMABLES ...................................................................... 28,930 28,930 

069 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES .................................................. 5,268 5,268 

070 SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................. 60,306 60,306 

071 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION .................................. 1,775 1,775 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................. 17,927,651 17,875,403 

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

001 TRIDENT II MODS ............................................................................ 1,140,865 1,140,865 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

002 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .............................................. 7,617 7,617 

STRATEGIC MISSILES 

003 TOMAHAWK ...................................................................................... 312,456 312,456 

TACTICAL MISSILES 

004 AMRAAM ............................................................................................ 95,413 95,413 

005 SIDEWINDER .................................................................................... 117,208 117,208 

006 JSOW ................................................................................................... 136,794 136,794 

007 STANDARD MISSILE ....................................................................... 367,985 367,985 

008 RAM ..................................................................................................... 67,596 65,984 

Guidance and control assembly contract savings ..................... [–1,612 ] 

009 HELLFIRE .......................................................................................... 33,916 33,916 

011 STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM) ........ 6,278 6,278 

012 AERIAL TARGETS ............................................................................ 41,799 41,799 

013 OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT ............................................................ 3,538 3,538 

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

014 ESSM ................................................................................................... 76,749 76,749 

015 HARM MODS ..................................................................................... 111,902 111,902 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

016 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .......................................... 1,138 1,138 

017 FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON ..................................... 23,014 23,014 

ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

018 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................ 84,318 84,318 

TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 

019 SSTD .................................................................................................... 3,978 3,978 

020 ASW TARGETS .................................................................................. 8,031 8,031 

MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 

021 MK–54 TORPEDO MODS ................................................................. 125,898 125,898 
H. R. 3304—424 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

022 MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS ................................................... 53,203 53,203 

023 QUICKSTRIKE MINE ....................................................................... 7,800 7,800 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

024 TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 59,730 59,730 

025 ASW RANGE SUPPORT ................................................................... 4,222 4,222 

DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 

026 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION .................................. 3,963 3,963 

GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 

027 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS ....................................................... 12,513 12,513 

MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 

028 CIWS MODS ....................................................................................... 56,308 62,708 

Additional RMA kits ................................................................... [6,400 ] 

029 COAST GUARD WEAPONS .............................................................. 10,727 7,269 

Machine gun equipment cost growth ......................................... [–3,458 ] 

030 GUN MOUNT MODS ......................................................................... 72,901 59,521 

MK38 gun kits cost growth ........................................................ [–13,380 ] 

031 CRUISER MODERNIZATION WEAPONS ...................................... 1,943 1,943 

032 AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS ....................... 19,758 19,758 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

034 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 52,632 52,632 

TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................. 3,122,193 3,110,143 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC 

NAVY AMMUNITION 

001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS ......................................................... 37,703 37,703 

002 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES ............................................... 65,411 65,411 

003 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION ...................................................... 20,284 20,284 

004 PRACTICE BOMBS ........................................................................... 37,870 37,870 

005 CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES ............................. 53,764 53,764 

006 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES .................................. 67,194 67,194 

007 JATOS ................................................................................................. 2,749 2,749 

008 LRLAP 6′′ LONG RANGE ATTACK PROJECTILE ........................ 3,906 3,906 

009 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION ...................................................... 24,151 24,151 

010 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION ........................ 33,080 33,080 

011 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION ................................................ 40,398 40,398 

012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO .................................. 61,219 61,219 

013 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION .............................................. 10,637 10,637 

014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION ..................................... 4,578 4,578 

MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 

015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION ......................................................... 26,297 26,297 

016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES .................................................... 6,088 6,088 

017 40 MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................... 7,644 7,644 

018 60MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 3,349 3,349 

020 120MM, ALL TYPES .......................................................................... 13,361 13,361 

022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ................................................................. 2,149 2,149 

023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES .................................................................... 27,465 27,465 

026 FUZE, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 26,366 26,366 

028 AMMO MODERNIZATION ............................................................... 8,403 8,403 

029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 5,201 5,201 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC ...... 589,267 589,267 

SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY 

OTHER WARSHIPS 

001 CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM .......................................... 944,866 944,866 

003 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE ...................................................... 2,930,704 3,422,704 

Increase to Virginia class ............................................................ [492,000 ] 

004 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 2,354,612 2,354,612 

005 CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS .................................................... 1,705,424 1,683,353 

CVN 72 requirement previously funded in Fiscal Year 2012 

reprogramming.

[–22,071 ] 

006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 245,793 245,793 

007 DDG 1000 ............................................................................................ 231,694 231,694 

008 DDG–51 ............................................................................................... 1,615,564 1,615,564 

009 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 388,551 388,551 

010 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP ............................................................... 1,793,014 1,793,014 

AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS 

012 AFLOAT FORWARD STAGING BASE ............................................ 524,000 579,300 
H. R. 3304—425 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Navy requested adjustment ........................................................ [55,300 ] 

014 JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL ......................................................... 2,732 2,732 

AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST 

016 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 183,900 207,300 

Program shortfall ........................................................................ [23,400 ] 

017 OUTFITTING ...................................................................................... 450,163 450,163 

019 LCAC SLEP ........................................................................................ 80,987 80,987 

020 COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS ................... 625,800 733,400 

DDG–51 ........................................................................................ [100,000 ] 

Joint High Speed Vessel ............................................................. [7,600 ] 

TOTAL SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY ........ 14,077,804 14,734,033 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT 

001 LM–2500 GAS TURBINE .................................................................. 10,180 10,180 

002 ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE ....................................................... 5,536 5,536 

003 HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE (HED) ................................................. 16,956 3,956 

Contract delay .............................................................................. [–13,000 ] 

GENERATORS 

004 SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E ..................................................... 19,782 19,782 

NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 

005 OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT .............................................. 39,509 39,509 

PERISCOPES 

006 SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP ........................................ 52,515 52,515 

OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT 

007 DDG MOD ........................................................................................... 285,994 285,994 

008 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 14,389 14,389 

009 COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD .............................. 2,436 2,436 

010 LHA/LHD MIDLIFE ........................................................................... 12,700 12,700 

011 LCC 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM ..................... 40,329 40,329 

012 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT ........................................... 19,603 19,603 

013 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................................... 8,678 8,678 

014 VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................... 74,209 74,209 

015 LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................. 47,078 47,078 

016 SUBMARINE BATTERIES ............................................................... 37,000 37,000 

017 LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................. 25,053 25,053 

018 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP ................................. 12,986 12,986 

019 DSSP EQUIPMENT ........................................................................... 2,455 2,455 

020 CG MODERNIZATION ...................................................................... 10,539 10,539 

021 LCAC ................................................................................................... 14,431 14,431 

022 UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS .................................................. 36,700 36,700 

023 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 119,902 119,902 

024 CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS ............................................ 3,678 3,678 

025 SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................................ 8,292 8,292 

REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT 

027 REACTOR COMPONENTS ............................................................... 286,744 286,744 

OCEAN ENGINEERING 

028 DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT .......................................... 8,780 8,780 

SMALL BOATS 

029 STANDARD BOATS ........................................................................... 36,452 33,056 

CNIC force protection medium contract delay .......................... [–3,396 ] 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

030 OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT ...................................... 36,145 36,145 

PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT 

031 OPERATING FORCES IPE ............................................................... 69,368 49,868 

Emergent repair facility outfitting ahead of need .................... [–19,500 ] 

OTHER SHIP SUPPORT 

032 NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS ............................................................... 106,328 106,328 

033 LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT .................... 45,966 45,966 

034 LCS MCM MISSION MODULES ..................................................... 59,885 59,885 

035 LCS SUW MISSION MODULES ...................................................... 37,168 37,168 

LOGISTIC SUPPORT 

036 LSD MIDLIFE .................................................................................... 77,974 77,974 

SHIP SONARS 

038 SPQ–9B RADAR ................................................................................. 27,934 27,934 

039 AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM .................................. 83,231 83,231 

040 SSN ACOUSTICS ............................................................................... 199,438 199,438 
H. R. 3304—426 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

041 UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................ 9,394 9,394 

042 SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS .................................... 12,953 12,953 

043 ELECTRONIC WARFARE MILDEC ................................................ 8,958 8,958 

ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

044 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM ............................ 24,077 24,077 

045 SSTD .................................................................................................... 11,925 8,500 

AN/SLQ–25X cancellation ........................................................... [–3,425 ] 

046 FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .................................................. 94,338 94,338 

047 SURTASS ............................................................................................ 9,680 9,680 

048 MARITIME PATROL AND RECONNSAISANCE FORCE ............ 18,130 18,130 

ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT 

049 AN/SLQ–32 .......................................................................................... 203,375 199,691 

Excess block 2 support funding .................................................. [–3,684 ] 

RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT 

050 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT ............................................................... 123,656 123,656 

051 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) ......................... 896 896 

SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT 

052 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG ............................... 49,475 49,475 

OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

053 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY ............................. 34,692 34,692 

054 TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS) .................................... 396 396 

055 NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS) ... 15,703 15,703 

056 ATDLS ................................................................................................. 3,836 3,836 

057 NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS) ................. 7,201 7,201 

058 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT ................................ 54,400 54,400 

059 SHALLOW WATER MCM ................................................................. 8,548 8,548 

060 NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) ............................................ 11,765 11,765 

061 AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE ......................... 6,483 6,483 

062 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP ................................. 7,631 7,631 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

063 OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT ................................................... 53,644 53,644 

AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

064 MATCALS ........................................................................................... 7,461 7,461 

065 SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL .......................................... 9,140 9,140 

066 AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM ................................ 20,798 20,798 

067 NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM ................................................... 19,754 19,754 

068 FLEET AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS ................................. 8,909 8,909 

069 LANDING SYSTEMS ......................................................................... 13,554 13,554 

070 ID SYSTEMS ...................................................................................... 38,934 38,934 

071 NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS ...................................... 14,131 14,131 

OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

072 DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND & CONTROL ......................... 3,249 3,249 

073 MARITIME INTEGRATED BROADCAST SYSTEM ...................... 11,646 11,646 

074 TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS ................................................ 18,189 18,189 

075 DCGS-N ............................................................................................... 17,350 17,350 

076 CANES ................................................................................................. 340,567 340,567 

077 RADIAC ............................................................................................... 9,835 9,835 

078 CANES-INTELL ................................................................................. 59,652 59,652 

079 GPETE ................................................................................................. 6,253 6,253 

080 INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY ................................. 4,963 4,963 

081 EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION ........................................... 4,664 4,664 

082 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 66,889 66,889 

SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS 

084 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION ................................... 23,877 23,877 

086 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M .................................... 28,001 28,001 

SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS 

087 SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT ........................................... 7,856 7,856 

088 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT .......................... 74,376 74,376 

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 

089 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS ................................ 27,381 27,381 

090 NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) ........................................ 215,952 215,952 

SHORE COMMUNICATIONS 

091 JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT ........................................ 4,463 4,463 

092 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS ................................................... 778 778 

CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT 

094 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) ............................ 133,530 133,530 

095 MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM ............................................... 1,000 1,000 
H. R. 3304—427 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT 

096 CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP ............................... 12,251 12,251 

OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT 

097 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 2,893 2,893 

SONOBUOYS 

099 SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES ............................................................. 179,927 179,927 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

100 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................ 55,279 55,279 

101 EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS ........................................................ 8,792 8,792 

102 AIRCRAFT REARMING EQUIPMENT ........................................... 11,364 11,364 

103 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & RECOVERY EQUIPMENT ...................... 59,502 59,502 

104 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT ................................................. 19,118 19,118 

105 DCRS/DPL ........................................................................................... 1,425 1,425 

106 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT .............................................................. 29,670 29,670 

107 AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES .................................... 101,554 101,554 

108 LAMPS MK III SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT ................................... 18,293 18,293 

109 PORTABLE ELECTRONIC MAINTENANCE AIDS ...................... 7,969 7,969 

110 OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................ 5,215 5,215 

111 AUTONOMIC LOGISTICS INFORMATION SYSTEM (ALIS) ...... 4,827 4,827 

SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT 

112 NAVAL FIRES CONTROL SYSTEM ............................................... 1,188 1,188 

113 GUN FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT .............................................. 4,447 4,447 

SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 

114 NATO SEASPARROW ....................................................................... 58,368 58,368 

115 RAM GMLS ......................................................................................... 491 491 

116 SHIP SELF DEFENSE SYSTEM ..................................................... 51,858 51,858 

117 AEGIS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 59,757 59,757 

118 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................... 71,559 71,559 

119 VERTICAL LAUNCH SYSTEMS ...................................................... 626 626 

120 MARITIME INTEGRATED PLANNING SYSTEM-MIPS .............. 2,779 2,779 

FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

121 STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP ...................................... 224,484 224,484 

ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

122 SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS .............................................. 85,678 85,678 

123 SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................. 3,913 3,913 

124 SURFACE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...................................... 3,909 3,909 

125 ASW RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................... 28,694 28,694 

OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

126 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP ............................... 46,586 46,586 

127 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 11,933 11,933 

OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE 

128 ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM .......................................... 62,361 62,361 

129 SURFACE TRAINING DEVICE MODS ........................................... 41,813 41,813 

130 SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS ..................................... 26,672 26,672 

CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

131 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ............................................ 5,600 5,600 

132 GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS ....................................................... 3,717 3,717 

133 CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP ............................... 10,881 10,881 

134 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 14,748 14,748 

135 TACTICAL VEHICLES ...................................................................... 5,540 5,540 

136 AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 5,741 5,741 

137 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT ........................................... 3,852 3,852 

138 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION ........................................................... 25,757 25,757 

139 PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES ................................................. 1,182 1,182 

SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

140 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT ........................................ 14,250 14,250 

141 OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .................................... 6,401 6,401 

142 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION .................................. 5,718 5,718 

143 SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS ....................................... 22,597 22,597 

TRAINING DEVICES 

144 TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 22,527 22,527 

COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

145 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................. 50,428 50,428 

146 EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................... 2,292 2,292 

147 MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................ 4,925 4,925 

149 NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................ 3,202 3,202 

151 OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................... 24,294 24,294 
H. R. 3304—428 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

152 C4ISR EQUIPMENT .......................................................................... 4,287 4,287 

153 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................ 18,276 18,276 

154 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ............................................. 134,495 134,495 

155 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ............................ 324,327 324,327 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

156A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 12,140 12,140 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

157 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 317,234 317,234 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY ....................... 6,310,257 6,267,252 

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS 

TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

001 AAV7A1 PIP ........................................................................................ 32,360 32,360 

002 LAV PIP .............................................................................................. 6,003 6,003 

ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS 

003 EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM ................................ 589 589 

004 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER ............................... 3,655 3,655 

005 HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM ....................... 5,467 5,467 

006 WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION .... 20,354 20,354 

OTHER SUPPORT 

007 MODIFICATION KITS ...................................................................... 38,446 38,446 

008 WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM ...................................... 4,734 4,734 

GUIDED MISSILES 

009 GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE ................................................... 15,713 15,713 

010 JAVELIN ............................................................................................. 36,175 36,175 

012 ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H) ............... 1,136 1,136 

OTHER SUPPORT 

013 MODIFICATION KITS ...................................................................... 33,976 30,078 

TOW Unit Cost Growth .............................................................. [–3,898 ] 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 

014 UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER ......................................................... 16,273 16,273 

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 

015 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT .................................................. 41,063 41,063 

OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 

016 COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ......................................................... 2,930 2,930 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 

018 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) ............................ 1,637 1,637 

019 AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS .................................................... 18,394 18,394 

RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

020 RADAR SYSTEMS ............................................................................. 114,051 101,941 

Previously funded EDM refurbishment ..................................... [–12,110 ] 

021 RQ–21 UAS ......................................................................................... 66,612 66,612 

INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

022 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM ................................................................. 3,749 3,749 

023 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ..................................... 75,979 75,979 

026 RQ–11 UAV ......................................................................................... 1,653 1,653 

027 DCGS-MC ............................................................................................ 9,494 9,494 

OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

028 NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 6,171 6,171 

OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 

029 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES ............................................ 121,955 119,955 

Unit cost growth .......................................................................... [–2,000 ] 

030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS ........................................................... 83,294 83,294 

031 RADIO SYSTEMS .............................................................................. 74,718 74,718 

032 COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS ............................... 47,613 47,613 

033 COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT .......................... 19,573 19,573 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

033A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 5,659 5,659 

ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES 

034 COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES ...................................... 1,039 1,039 

035 COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES ................................................ 31,050 31,050 

TACTICAL VEHICLES 

036 5/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP) ........................................................... 36,333 36,333 

037 MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS ....................................... 3,137 3,137 

040 FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS ................................................ 27,385 27,385 

OTHER SUPPORT 

041 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 7,016 7,016 
H. R. 3304—429 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 

042 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT .......................... 14,377 14,377 

043 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 24,864 24,864 

044 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS ............................................................ 21,592 21,592 

045 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED ................................................. 61,353 61,353 

046 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ......................................... 4,827 4,827 

047 EOD SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 40,011 40,011 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

048 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ............................................. 16,809 16,809 

049 GARRISON MOBILE ENGINEER EQUIPMENT (GMEE) ............ 3,408 3,408 

050 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP ...................................................... 48,549 48,549 

051 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION .................................. 190 190 

GENERAL PROPERTY 

052 FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 23,129 23,129 

053 TRAINING DEVICES ........................................................................ 8,346 8,346 

054 CONTAINER FAMILY ....................................................................... 1,857 1,857 

055 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ................................ 36,198 36,198 

056 RAPID DEPLOYABLE KITCHEN .................................................... 2,390 2,390 

OTHER SUPPORT 

057 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 6,525 6,525 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

058 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 13,700 13,700 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS .................. 1,343,511 1,325,503 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

TACTICAL FORCES 

001 F–35 ..................................................................................................... 3,060,770 2,989,270 

Decrease non-recurring engineering initiatives ........................ [–71,500 ] 

002 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 363,783 363,783 

OTHER AIRLIFT 

005 C–130J ................................................................................................. 537,517 537,517 

006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 162,000 162,000 

007 HC–130J .............................................................................................. 132,121 132,121 

008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 88,000 88,000 

009 MC–130J ............................................................................................. 389,434 389,434 

010 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 104,000 104,000 

HELICOPTERS 

015 CV–22 (MYP) ...................................................................................... 230,798 230,798 

MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 

017 CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C ................................................................... 2,541 2,541 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

020 TARGET DRONES ............................................................................. 138,669 138,669 

022 AC–130J .............................................................................................. 470,019 470,019 

024 RQ–4 .................................................................................................... 27,000 11,000 

Production closeout ...................................................................... [–16,000 ] 

027 MQ–9 ................................................................................................... 272,217 352,217 

Program increase ......................................................................... [80,000 ] 

028 RQ–4 BLOCK 40 PROC ..................................................................... 1,747 1,747 

STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 

029 B–2A .................................................................................................... 20,019 20,019 

030 B–1B .................................................................................................... 132,222 132,222 

031 B–52 ..................................................................................................... 111,002 105,882 

Internal Weapons Bay Upgrade defer low rate initial production.[–5,120 ] 

032 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES .............. 27,197 27,197 

TACTICAL AIRCRAFT 

033 A–10 ..................................................................................................... 47,598 47,598 

034 F–15 ..................................................................................................... 354,624 354,624 

035 F–16 ..................................................................................................... 11,794 11,794 

036 F–22A .................................................................................................. 285,830 285,830 

037 F–35 MODIFICATIONS ..................................................................... 157,777 157,777 

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 

038 C–5 ....................................................................................................... 2,456 2,456 

039 C–5M .................................................................................................... 1,021,967 983,967 

Program excess ............................................................................ [–38,000 ] 

042 C–17A .................................................................................................. 143,197 143,197 

043 C–21 ..................................................................................................... 103 103 
H. R. 3304—430 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

044 C–32A .................................................................................................. 9,780 9,780 

045 C–37A .................................................................................................. 452 452 

LRIP Kit Procurement ................................................................ [47,300 ] 

Transfer to Title II, RDAF, line 230 .......................................... [–47,300 ] 

TRAINER AIRCRAFT 

047 GLIDER MODS .................................................................................. 128 128 

048 T–6 ....................................................................................................... 6,427 6,427 

049 T–1 ....................................................................................................... 277 277 

050 T–38 ..................................................................................................... 28,686 28,686 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

052 U–2 MODS .......................................................................................... 45,591 45,591 

053 KC–10A (ATCA) .................................................................................. 70,918 70,918 

054 C–12 ..................................................................................................... 1,876 1,876 

055 MC–12W .............................................................................................. 5,000 5,000 

056 C–20 MODS ........................................................................................ 192 192 

057 VC–25A MOD ...................................................................................... 263 263 

058 C–40 ..................................................................................................... 6,119 6,119 

059 C–130 ................................................................................................... 58,577 74,277 

C–130H Propulsion System Engine Upgrades .......................... [15,700 ] 

061 C–130J MODS .................................................................................... 10,475 10,475 

062 C–135 ................................................................................................... 46,556 46,556 

063 COMPASS CALL MODS .................................................................... 34,494 34,494 

064 RC–135 ................................................................................................ 171,813 171,813 

065 E–3 ....................................................................................................... 197,087 197,087 

066 E–4 ....................................................................................................... 14,304 14,304 

067 E–8 ....................................................................................................... 57,472 57,472 

068 H–1 ....................................................................................................... 6,627 6,627 

069 H–60 ..................................................................................................... 27,654 27,654 

070 RQ–4 MODS ........................................................................................ 9,313 9,313 

071 HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS ........................................................ 16,300 16,300 

072 OTHER AIRCRAFT ............................................................................ 6,948 6,948 

073 MQ–1 MODS ....................................................................................... 9,734 9,734 

074 MQ–9 MODS ....................................................................................... 102,970 62,970 

Anti-ice production ahead of need .............................................. [–5,520 ] 

Lynx radar reduction .................................................................. [–34,480 ] 

076 RQ–4 GSRA/CSRA MODS ................................................................. 30,000 30,000 

077 CV–22 MODS ...................................................................................... 23,310 23,310 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

078 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS .................................................. 463,285 463,285 

COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

079 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP ............................ 49,140 49,140 

POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT 

081 B–1 ....................................................................................................... 3,683 3,683 

083 B–2A .................................................................................................... 43,786 43,786 

084 B–52 ..................................................................................................... 7,000 7,000 

087 C–17A .................................................................................................. 81,952 81,952 

089 C–135 ................................................................................................... 8,597 8,597 

090 F–15 ..................................................................................................... 2,403 2,403 

091 F–16 ..................................................................................................... 3,455 3,455 

092 F–22A .................................................................................................. 5,911 5,911 

INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 

094 INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS .................................................. 21,148 21,148 

WAR CONSUMABLES 

095 WAR CONSUMABLES ...................................................................... 94,947 94,947 

OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 

096 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES .................................................. 1,242,004 1,242,004 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

101A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 75,845 75,845 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ..... 11,398,901 11,323,981 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC 

001 MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC ................................... 39,104 39,104 

TACTICAL 

002 JASSM ................................................................................................. 291,151 291,151 

003 SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X) ................................................................... 119,904 119,904 

004 AMRAAM ............................................................................................ 340,015 340,015 
H. R. 3304—431 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE ................................................... 48,548 48,548 

006 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB .............................................................. 42,347 42,347 

INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 

007 INDUSTR’L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION ........................... 752 752 

CLASS IV 

009 MM III MODIFICATIONS ................................................................. 21,635 21,635 

010 AGM–65D MAVERICK ...................................................................... 276 276 

011 AGM–88A HARM ............................................................................... 580 580 

012 AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) ...................................... 6,888 6,888 

013 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB .............................................................. 5,000 5,000 

MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

014 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS .................................................. 72,080 72,080 

SPACE PROGRAMS 

015 ADVANCED EHF ............................................................................... 379,586 379,586 

016 WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES(SPACE) .......................... 38,398 38,398 

017 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT ............................................................... 403,431 403,431 

018 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 74,167 74,167 

019 SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) .................................................. 5,244 5,244 

020 GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE) ................................................... 55,997 55,997 

021 DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG(SPACE) ............................. 95,673 95,673 

022 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH(SPACE) ...................... 1,852,900 1,852,900 

023 SBIR HIGH (SPACE) ......................................................................... 583,192 583,192 

SPECIAL PROGRAMS 

029 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS ...................................................... 36,716 36,716 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

029A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 829,702 829,702 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ......... 5,343,286 5,343,286 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE 

ROCKETS 

001 ROCKETS ........................................................................................... 15,735 15,735 

CARTRIDGES 

002 CARTRIDGES ..................................................................................... 129,921 129,921 

BOMBS 

003 PRACTICE BOMBS ........................................................................... 30,840 30,840 

004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS ......................................................... 187,397 187,397 

005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION ............................................ 188,510 188,510 

OTHER ITEMS 

006 CAD/PAD ............................................................................................. 35,837 35,837 

007 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) ................................. 7,531 7,531 

008 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 499 499 

009 MODIFICATIONS .............................................................................. 480 480 

010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 9,765 9,765 

FLARES 

011 FLARES ............................................................................................... 55,864 55,864 

FUZES 

013 FUZES ................................................................................................. 76,037 76,037 

SMALL ARMS 

014 SMALL ARMS .................................................................................... 21,026 21,026 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR 

FORCE.

759,442 759,442 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 

001 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ............................................ 2,048 2,048 

CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES 

002 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE ...................................................... 8,019 8,019 

003 CAP VEHICLES ................................................................................. 946 946 

004 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 7,138 7,138 

SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 

005 SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES ........................................ 13,093 13,093 

006 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 13,983 13,983 

FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 

007 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES ............................ 23,794 23,794 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

008 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 8,669 8,669 

BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 
H. R. 3304—432 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

009 RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & CLEANING EQUIP ......................... 6,144 6,144 

010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 1,580 1,580 

COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) 

012 COMSEC EQUIPMENT ..................................................................... 149,661 149,661 

013 MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC) .......................................................... 726 726 

INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 

014 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT ................................... 2,789 2,789 

015 INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT .......................................... 31,875 31,875 

016 ADVANCE TECH SENSORS ............................................................ 452 452 

017 MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS .................................................... 14,203 14,203 

ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 

018 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS .................................. 46,232 46,232 

019 NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM .................................................... 11,685 11,685 

020 BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED ........................................... 19,248 19,248 

021 THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMENTS ....................... 19,292 19,292 

022 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST ........................................ 17,166 17,166 

023 STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL ..................................... 22,723 22,723 

024 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX ............................................. 27,930 27,930 

025 TAC SIGNIT SPT ............................................................................... 217 217 

SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 

027 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY .................................. 49,627 49,627 

028 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS .................................. 13,559 13,559 

029 MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL ....................................... 11,186 11,186 

030 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM ............................... 43,238 43,238 

031 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES ........................................................ 10,431 10,431 

032 C3 COUNTERMEASURES ................................................................ 13,769 13,769 

033 GCSS-AF FOS ..................................................................................... 19,138 19,138 

034 THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM ........................................... 8,809 8,809 

035 AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CTR-WPN SYS ................................ 26,935 26,935 

AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS 

036 INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS ....................................... 80,558 80,558 

038 AFNET ................................................................................................. 97,588 97,588 

039 VOICE SYSTEMS ............................................................................... 8,419 8,419 

040 USCENTCOM ..................................................................................... 34,276 34,276 

SPACE PROGRAMS 

041 SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PGM SPACE ...................................... 28,235 28,235 

042 NAVSTAR GPS SPACE ..................................................................... 2,061 2,061 

043 NUDET DETECTION SYS SPACE .................................................. 4,415 4,415 

044 AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE ............................ 30,237 30,237 

045 SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE ........................................... 98,062 98,062 

046 MILSATCOM SPACE ......................................................................... 105,935 105,935 

047 SPACE MODS SPACE ....................................................................... 37,861 37,861 

048 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM .............................................................. 7,171 7,171 

ORGANIZATION AND BASE 

049 TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT .......................................................... 83,537 83,537 

050 COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATER .................................... 11,884 8,634 

Unjustified unit cost growth for batteries ................................. [–3,250 ] 

051 RADIO EQUIPMENT ......................................................................... 14,711 14,711 

052 CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT ............................................... 10,275 10,275 

053 BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................. 50,907 50,907 

MODIFICATIONS 

054 COMM ELECT MODS ....................................................................... 55,701 55,701 

PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP 

055 NIGHT VISION GOGGLES ............................................................... 14,524 4,036 

Night Vision Cueing and Display termination ......................... [–10,488 ] 

056 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 28,655 28,655 

DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ 

057 MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP ........................... 9,332 9,332 

BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

058 BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT .................................................... 16,762 16,762 

059 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS ....................................................... 33,768 33,768 

060 PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT .................................... 2,495 2,495 

061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT .................................................................. 12,859 12,859 

062 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 1,954 1,954 

SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 

064 DARP RC135 ....................................................................................... 24,528 24,528 

065 DCGS-AF ............................................................................................. 137,819 137,819 
H. R. 3304—433 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

067 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM ........................................................ 479,586 479,586 

068 DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG. ............................ 45,159 45,159 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 14,519,256 14,519,256 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

069 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 25,746 25,746 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ............ 16,760,581 16,746,843 

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA 

001 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 1,291 1,291 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA 

002 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ....................................................................... 5,711 5,711 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA 

003 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION ................................................... 47,201 47,201 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 

009 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY .......................................... 16,189 16,189 

012 TELEPORT PROGRAM ..................................................................... 66,075 66,075 

013 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 83,881 83,881 

014 NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) ....................... 2,572 2,572 

015 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK ......................... 125,557 125,557 

017 CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ..................................................... 16,941 16,941 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA 

018 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ....................................................................... 13,137 13,137 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT 

019 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ....................................................................... 15,414 15,414 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA 

020 AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS ......... 1,454 1,454 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 

021 EQUIPMENT ...................................................................................... 978 978 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS 

022 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ....................................................................... 5,020 5,020 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION 

AGENCY 

023 VEHICLES .......................................................................................... 100 100 

024 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 13,395 13,395 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 

026 THAAD ................................................................................................ 581,005 581,005 

027 AEGIS BMD ........................................................................................ 580,814 580,814 

028 BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS ............................................................... 62,000 62,000 

029 AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III ............................................................. 131,400 131,400 

031 IRON DOME ....................................................................................... 220,309 220,309 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA 

039 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) .......... 14,363 14,363 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 

040 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD ............................................................. 37,345 37,345 

041 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, INTELLIGENCE ........................................ 16,678 16,678 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS 

042 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS ............................................................... 14,792 14,792 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS 

043 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS ............................................................ 35,259 35,259 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

043A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 544,272 544,272 

AVIATION PROGRAMS 

045 ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT ..................... 112,456 112,456 

046 MH–60 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ........................................... 81,457 81,457 

047 NON-STANDARD AVIATION ........................................................... 2,650 2,650 

048 U–28 ..................................................................................................... 56,208 56,208 

049 MH–47 CHINOOK .............................................................................. 19,766 19,766 

050 RQ–11 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ........................................ 850 850 

051 CV–22 MODIFICATION .................................................................... 98,927 98,927 

052 MQ–1 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ......................................... 20,576 20,576 

053 MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ......................................... 1,893 14,893 

Capability Improvements ............................................................ [13,000 ] 

055 STUASL0 ............................................................................................. 13,166 13,166 

056 PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE ..................................................... 107,687 107,687 
H. R. 3304—434 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

057 AC/MC–130J ....................................................................................... 51,870 51,870 

059 C–130 MODIFICATIONS .................................................................. 71,940 61,317 

C–130 TF/TA—early to need ...................................................... [–10,623 ] 

SHIPBUILDING 

061 UNDERWATER SYSTEMS ............................................................... 37,439 37,439 

AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 

063 ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M ................................................................ 159,029 159,029 

OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 

066 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS ............................................................. 79,819 79,819 

068 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ........ 14,906 14,906 

070 OTHER ITEMS <$5M ........................................................................ 81,711 81,711 

071 COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS .................................................... 35,053 33,897 

CCFLIR—Transfer at USSOCOM Request ............................... [–1,156 ] 

074 SPECIAL PROGRAMS ....................................................................... 41,526 41,526 

075 TACTICAL VEHICLES ...................................................................... 43,353 43,353 

076 WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M .............................................................. 210,540 210,540 

078 COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS ........................................... 20,000 20,000 

082 GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES .......................... 6,645 6,645 

083 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE ................. 25,581 25,581 

089 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS ................................................ 191,061 191,061 

CBDP 

091 INSTALLATION FORCE PROTECTION ........................................ 14,271 14,271 

092 INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION ............................................................ 101,667 101,667 

094 JOINT BIO DEFENSE PROGRAM (MEDICAL) ............................. 13,447 13,447 

095 COLLECTIVE PROTECTION ........................................................... 20,896 20,896 

096 CONTAMINATION AVOIDANCE .................................................... 144,540 144,540 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE ................... 4,534,083 4,535,304 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

001 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND ......................... 98,800 0 

Program reduction ....................................................................... [–98,800 ] 

TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS 

FUND.

98,800 0 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT .................................................... 98,227,168 98,442,249 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

FIXED WING 

002 SATURN ARCH (MIP) ....................................................................... 48,000 48,000 

004 MQ–1 UAV .......................................................................................... 31,988 31,988 

ROTARY 

009 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIB NEW BUILD ................................... 142,000 142,000 

011 KIOWA WARRIOR WRA ................................................................... 163,800 163,800 

014 CH–47 HELICOPTER ........................................................................ 386,000 386,000 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................ 771,788 771,788 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 

003 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY ............................................................. 54,000 54,000 

ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 

007 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) ................................................ 39,045 39,045 

010 ARMY TACTICAL MSL SYS (ATACMS)—SYS SUM ..................... 35,600 35,600 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY .................... 128,645 128,645 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY 

SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 

002 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................... 4,400 4,400 
H. R. 3304—435 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES ......................................................... 1,500 1,500 

005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES ............................................................... 5,000 5,000 

008 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 60,000 60,000 

MORTAR AMMUNITION 

010 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .......................................................... 5,000 5,000 

ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 

014 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES ........ 10,000 10,000 

015 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES ......................... 10,000 10,000 

016 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 ...................................... 11,000 11,000 

ROCKETS 

021 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES .................................................. 57,000 57,000 

OTHER AMMUNITION 

022 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES ...................................... 4,000 4,000 

023 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ................................................................. 3,000 3,000 

024 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES ...................................................................... 8,000 8,000 

MISCELLANEOUS 

028 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES ....................................................................... 2,000 2,000 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY .. 180,900 180,900 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

013 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS ....... 321,040 321,040 

COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 

060 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM ... 25,000 25,000 

ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 

067 DCGS-A (MIP) .................................................................................... 7,200 7,200 

071 CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS) ................ 5,980 5,980 

ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 

074 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR .............................. 57,800 57,800 

078 FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITIE ...... 15,300 15,300 

079 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES 4,221 4,221 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 

091 ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP .................................................... 1,834 1,834 

096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR) ..................................................... 21,000 21,000 

098 COUNTERFIRE RADARS ................................................................. 85,830 85,830 

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

146 FORCE PROVIDER ........................................................................... 51,654 51,654 

147 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 6,264 6,264 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY ...................... 603,123 603,123 

JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND 

NETWORK ATTACK 

001 ATTACK THE NETWORK ................................................................ 417,700 417,700 

JIEDDO DEVICE DEFEAT 

002 DEFEAT THE DEVICE ..................................................................... 248,886 248,886 

FORCE TRAINING 

003 TRAIN THE FORCE .......................................................................... 106,000 106,000 

STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE 

004 OPERATIONS ..................................................................................... 227,414 182,414 

Program decrease ........................................................................ [–45,000 ] 

TOTAL JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT 

FUND.

1,000,000 955,000 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

COMBAT AIRCRAFT 

011 H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) ................................................... 29,520 29,520 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

026 MQ–8 UAV .......................................................................................... 13,100 13,100 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

031 AV–8 SERIES ..................................................................................... 57,652 57,652 

033 F–18 SERIES ...................................................................................... 35,500 35,500 

039 EP–3 SERIES ...................................................................................... 2,700 2,700 

049 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT ...................................................... 3,375 3,375 

054 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 49,183 49,183 

055 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES .................................................... 4,190 4,190 

059 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION ............................................................ 20,700 20,700 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

065 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 24,776 24,776 
H. R. 3304—436 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................. 240,696 240,696 

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

TACTICAL MISSILES 

009 HELLFIRE .......................................................................................... 27,000 27,000 

010 LASER MAVERICK ........................................................................... 58,000 58,000 

011 STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM) ........ 1,500 1,500 

TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................. 86,500 86,500 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC 

NAVY AMMUNITION 

001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS ......................................................... 11,424 11,424 

002 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES ............................................... 30,332 30,332 

003 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION ...................................................... 8,282 8,282 

006 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES .................................. 31,884 31,884 

011 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION ................................................ 409 409 

012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO .................................. 11,976 11,976 

013 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION .............................................. 2,447 2,447 

014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION ..................................... 7,692 7,692 

MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 

015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION ......................................................... 13,461 13,461 

016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES .................................................... 3,310 3,310 

017 40 MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................... 6,244 6,244 

018 60MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 3,368 3,368 

019 81MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 9,162 9,162 

020 120MM, ALL TYPES .......................................................................... 10,266 10,266 

021 CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES ................................................................... 1,887 1,887 

022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ................................................................. 1,611 1,611 

023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES .................................................................... 37,459 37,459 

024 ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES ................................................................. 970 970 

025 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES ...................................... 418 418 

026 FUZE, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 14,219 14,219 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC ...... 206,821 206,821 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

135 TACTICAL VEHICLES ...................................................................... 17,968 17,968 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY ....................... 17,968 17,968 

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS 

GUIDED MISSILES 

010 JAVELIN ............................................................................................. 29,334 29,334 

011 FOLLOW ON TO SMAW ................................................................... 105 105 

OTHER SUPPORT 

013 MODIFICATION KITS ...................................................................... 16,081 13,183 

TOW Unit Cost Growth .............................................................. [–2,898 ] 

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 

015 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT .................................................. 16,081 16,081 

OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 

017 MODIFICATION KITS ...................................................................... 2,831 2,831 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 

018 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) ............................ 8,170 8,170 

INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

023 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ..................................... 2,700 2,700 

026 RQ–11 UAV ......................................................................................... 2,830 2,830 

OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 

029 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES ............................................ 4,866 4,866 

030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS ........................................................... 265 265 

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 

042 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT .......................... 114 114 

043 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 523 523 

044 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS ............................................................ 365 365 

045 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED ................................................. 2,004 2,004 

047 EOD SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 42,930 42,930 

GENERAL PROPERTY 

055 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ................................ 385 385 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS .................. 129,584 126,686 
H. R. 3304—437 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 

032 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES .............. 94,050 94,050 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

052 U–2 MODS .......................................................................................... 11,300 11,300 

059 C–130 ................................................................................................... 1,618 1,618 

064 RC–135 ................................................................................................ 2,700 2,700 

COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

079 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP ............................ 6,000 6,000 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ..... 115,668 115,668 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

TACTICAL 

005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE ................................................... 24,200 24,200 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ......... 24,200 24,200 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE 

ROCKETS 

001 ROCKETS ........................................................................................... 326 326 

CARTRIDGES 

002 CARTRIDGES ..................................................................................... 17,634 17,634 

BOMBS 

004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS ......................................................... 37,514 37,514 

005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION ............................................ 84,459 84,459 

FLARES 

011 FLARES ............................................................................................... 14,973 14,973 

012 FUZES ................................................................................................. 3,859 3,859 

SMALL ARMS 

014 SMALL ARMS .................................................................................... 1,200 1,200 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR 

FORCE.

159,965 159,965 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 

022 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST ........................................ 1,800 1,800 

SPACE PROGRAMS 

046 MILSATCOM SPACE ......................................................................... 5,695 5,695 

BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

059 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS ....................................................... 60,600 60,600 

061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT .................................................................. 68,000 68,000 

SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 

068 DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG. ............................ 58,250 58,250 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 2,380,501 2,380,501 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ............ 2,574,846 2,574,846 

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 

012 TELEPORT PROGRAM ..................................................................... 4,760 4,760 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

043A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 78,986 78,986 

AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 

062 ORDNANCE REPLENISHMENT ..................................................... 2,841 2,841 

OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 

066 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS ............................................................. 13,300 13,300 

084 SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL SYSTEMS ................. 8,034 8,034 

089 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS ................................................ 3,354 3,354 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE ................... 111,275 111,275 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

001 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND ......................... 15,000 0 

Program reduction ....................................................................... [–15,000 ] 

TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS 

FUND.

15,000 0 
H. R. 3304—438 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

999 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT .................................................... 400,000 

Program increase ......................................................................... [400,000 ] 

TOTAL NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT.400,000 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT .................................................... 6,366,979 6,704,081 

TITLE XLII—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION. 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, 

ARMY 

BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601101A IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH 21,803 21,803 

002 0601102A DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES .................................... 221,901 221,901 

003 0601103A UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES .......................... 79,359 79,359 

004 0601104A UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS 113,662 113,662 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH .................................. 436,725 436,725 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

005 0602105A MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY .............................................. 26,585 26,585 

006 0602120A SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY ............ 43,170 43,170 

007 0602122A TRACTOR HIP ...................................................................... 36,293 36,293 

008 0602211A AVIATION TECHNOLOGY ................................................. 55,615 55,615 

009 0602270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY ....................... 17,585 17,585 

010 0602303A MISSILE TECHNOLOGY .................................................... 51,528 51,528 

011 0602307A ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY .......................... 26,162 26,162 

012 0602308A ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION .................. 24,063 24,063 

013 0602601A COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY.64,589 64,589 

014 0602618A BALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY .............................................. 68,300 76,300 

WIAMan schedule adjustment ...................................... [8,000 ] 

015 0602622A CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING 

TECHNOLOGY.

4,490 4,490 

016 0602623A JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM .................... 7,818 7,818 

017 0602624A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY ................ 37,798 37,798 

018 0602705A ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES ............... 59,021 59,021 

019 0602709A NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY ......................................... 43,426 43,426 

020 0602712A COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS ................................................ 20,574 20,574 

021 0602716A HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ...... 21,339 21,339 

022 0602720A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY ................ 20,316 20,316 

023 0602782A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY.34,209 34,209 

024 0602783A COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY ............... 10,439 10,439 

025 0602784A MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY .................... 70,064 70,064 

026 0602785A MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY 17,654 17,654 

027 0602786A WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY .......................................... 31,546 31,546 

028 0602787A MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY .................................................. 93,340 93,340 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ............................ 885,924 893,924 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

029 0603001A WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................... 56,056 56,056 

030 0603002A MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ............................ 62,032 62,032 

031 0603003A AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ........................... 81,080 81,080 
H. R. 3304—439 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

032 0603004A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.63,919 63,919 

033 0603005A COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED 

TECHNOLOGY.

97,043 97,043 

034 0603006A SPACE APPLICATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...... 5,866 5,866 

035 0603007A MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.7,800 7,800 

036 0603008A ELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 40,416 40,416 

037 0603009A TRACTOR HIKE ................................................................... 9,166 9,166 

038 0603015A NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS.13,627 13,627 

039 0603020A TRACTOR ROSE ................................................................... 10,667 10,667 

041 0603125A COMBATING TERRORISM—TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.15,054 15,054 

042 0603130A TRACTOR NAIL .................................................................... 3,194 3,194 

043 0603131A TRACTOR EGGS ................................................................... 2,367 2,367 

044 0603270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY ....................... 25,348 25,348 

045 0603313A MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ... 64,009 64,009 

046 0603322A TRACTOR CAGE ................................................................... 11,083 11,083 

047 0603461A HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM.180,662 180,662 

048 0603606A LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED 

TECHNOLOGY.

22,806 22,806 

049 0603607A JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM .................... 5,030 5,030 

050 0603710A NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................. 36,407 36,407 

051 0603728A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS.11,745 11,745 

052 0603734A MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.23,717 23,717 

053 0603772A ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND 

SENSOR TECHNOLOGY.

33,012 33,012 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.882,106 882,106 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & 

PROTOTYPES 

054 0603305A ARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ... 15,301 15,301 

055 0603308A ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ........................ 13,592 13,592 

056 0603619A LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER—ADV DEV ...... 10,625 0 

Program deferred to fiscal year 2019 ........................... [–10,625 ] 

058 0603639A TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION ............. 30,612 30,612 

059 0603653A ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM (ATAS) ......... 49,989 49,989 

060 0603747A SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY .................... 6,703 6,703 

061 0603766A TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM— 

ADV DEV.

6,894 6,894 

062 0603774A NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.9,066 9,066 

063 0603779A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/ 

VAL.

2,633 2,633 

064 0603782A WARFIGHTER INFORMATION NETWORK-TACTICAL—DEM/VAL.272,384 235,384 

Excess program growth .................................................. [–37,000 ] 

065 0603790A NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ....................... 3,874 3,874 

066 0603801A AVIATION—ADV DEV ......................................................... 5,018 5,018 

067 0603804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV 11,556 11,556 

069 0603807A MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV ....................................... 15,603 15,603 

070 0603827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ..... 14,159 14,159 

071 0603850A INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE ............................. 79 79 

072 0604115A TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES ................. 55,605 55,605 

074 0604319A INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INCREMENT 2–INTERCEPT (IFPC2).79,232 79,232 

075 0604785A INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE (BUDGET ACTIVITY 4) 4,476 4,476 

076 0305205A ENDURANCE UAVS ............................................................ 28,991 0 

LEMV termination ......................................................... [–28,991 ] 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES.636,392 559,776 
H. R. 3304—440 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

077 0604201A AIRCRAFT AVIONICS ......................................................... 76,588 76,588 

078 0604220A ARMED, DEPLOYABLE HELOS ........................................ 73,309 73,309 

079 0604270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT .................... 154,621 154,621 

080 0604280A JOINT TACTICAL RADIO ................................................... 31,826 31,826 

081 0604290A MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO 

(MNVR).

23,341 23,341 

082 0604321A ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM ................................... 4,839 4,839 

083 0604328A TRACTOR CAGE ................................................................... 23,841 23,841 

084 0604601A INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS ..................................... 79,855 90,855 

Transfer from WTCV line 15—XM25 development ..... [11,000 ] 

085 0604604A MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES ....................................... 2,140 2,140 

086 0604611A JAVELIN ................................................................................ 5,002 5,002 

087 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES .................... 21,321 21,321 

088 0604633A AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL .................................................... 514 514 

093 0604710A NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV ............................. 43,405 43,405 

094 0604713A COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT ... 1,939 1,939 

095 0604715A NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV ........... 18,980 18,980 

097 0604741A AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV.18,294 18,294 

098 0604742A CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.17,013 17,013 

099 0604746A AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT ....... 6,701 6,701 

100 0604760A DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)— 

ENG DEV.

14,575 14,575 

101 0604780A COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE 27,634 27,634 

102 0604798A BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION.193,748 193,748 

103 0604802A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV ....................... 15,721 15,721 

104 0604804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV 41,703 41,703 

105 0604805A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV.7,379 7,379 

106 0604807A MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV.39,468 39,468 

107 0604808A LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV ................ 92,285 92,285 

108 0604814A ARTILLERY MUNITIONS—EMD ....................................... 8,209 8,209 

109 0604818A ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE.22,958 22,958 

110 0604820A RADAR DEVELOPMENT .................................................... 1,549 1,549 

111 0604822A GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM 

(GFEBS).

17,342 227 

Excess to requirement .................................................... [–17,115 ] 

112 0604823A FIREFINDER ........................................................................ 47,221 47,221 

113 0604827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL .................... 48,477 48,477 

114 0604854A ARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD ........................................... 80,613 121,313 

Transfer from WTCV 6 at Army Request .................... [40,700 ] 

117 0605013A INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .......... 68,814 68,814 

118 0605018A INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY 

(IPPS-A).

137,290 137,290 

119 0605028A ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) ........... 116,298 116,298 

120 0605030A JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC) ............. 68,148 68,148 

121 0605380A AMF JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM (JTRS) ............ 33,219 33,219 

122 0605450A JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) ..................... 15,127 15,127 

124 0605456A PAC–3/MSE MISSILE .......................................................... 68,843 68,843 

125 0605457A ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE 

(AIAMD).

364,649 364,649 

126 0605625A MANNED GROUND VEHICLE ........................................... 592,201 592,201 

127 0605626A AERIAL COMMON SENSOR .............................................. 10,382 10,382 

128 0605766A NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP) ......... 21,143 21,143 

129 0605812A JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 

PH.

84,230 84,230 

130 0303032A TROJAN—RH12 .................................................................... 3,465 3,465 

131 0304270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT .................... 10,806 10,806 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION.2,857,026 2,891,611 
H. R. 3304—441 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

132 0604256A THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT .......................... 16,934 16,934 

133 0604258A TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ............................... 13,488 13,488 

134 0604759A MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT ............................................... 46,672 46,672 

135 0605103A RAND ARROYO CENTER ................................................... 11,919 11,919 

136 0605301A ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL ............................................... 193,658 193,658 

137 0605326A CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM ................ 37,158 37,158 

139 0605601A ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES ......................... 340,659 340,659 

140 0605602A ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND 

TARGETS.

66,061 66,061 

141 0605604A SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS ....................... 43,280 43,280 

143 0605606A AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION .............................................. 6,025 6,025 

144 0605702A METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES.7,349 7,349 

145 0605706A MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS ..................................... 19,809 19,809 

146 0605709A EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS ............................. 5,941 5,941 

147 0605712A SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING ......................... 55,504 55,504 

148 0605716A ARMY EVALUATION CENTER .......................................... 65,274 65,274 

149 0605718A ARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & 

INTEG.

1,283 1,283 

150 0605801A PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES ............................................ 82,035 82,035 

151 0605803A TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES ...................... 33,853 33,853 

152 0605805A MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS 

AND SAFETY.

53,340 53,340 

153 0605857A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT 

SUPPORT.

5,193 5,193 

154 0605898A MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D ................................................. 54,175 54,175 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT .... 1,159,610 1,159,610 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

156 0603778A MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ............... 110,576 110,576 

157 0607141A LOGISTICS AUTOMATION ................................................ 3,717 3,717 

159 0607865A PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT .............................. 70,053 70,053 

160 0102419A AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE ............................. 98,450 83,450 

JLENS program reduction ............................................. [–15,000 ] 

161 0203726A ADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA SYSTEM .... 30,940 30,940 

162 0203735A COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS ........ 177,532 177,532 

163 0203740A MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM ...................................... 36,495 36,495 

164 0203744A AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS.257,187 271,248 

Transfer from APA 11 at Army request ....................... [14,061 ] 

165 0203752A AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT 

PROGRAM.

315 315 

166 0203758A DIGITIZATION ...................................................................... 6,186 6,186 

167 0203801A MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT 

PROGRAM.

1,578 1,578 

168 0203802A OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS.62,100 62,100 

169 0203808A TRACTOR CARD ................................................................... 18,778 18,778 

170 0208053A JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM .............................. 7,108 7,108 

173 0303028A SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES .............. 7,600 7,600 

174 0303140A INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ......... 9,357 9,357 

175 0303141A GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................... 41,225 41,225 

176 0303142A SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE) ................ 18,197 18,197 

177 0303150A WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM.14,215 14,215 

179 0305204A TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ................. 33,533 33,533 

180 0305208A DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.27,622 27,622 

181 0305219A MQ–1C GRAY EAGLE UAS ................................................. 10,901 10,901 

182 0305232A RQ–11 UAV ............................................................................ 2,321 2,321 

183 0305233A RQ–7 UAV .............................................................................. 12,031 12,031 

185 0307665A BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE ...................... 12,449 12,449 

186 0708045A END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES.56,136 56,136 

186A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................... 4,717 4,717 
H. R. 3304—442 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.1,131,319 1,130,380 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST 

& EVAL, ARMY.

7,989,102 7,954,132 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY 

BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601103N UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES .......................... 112,617 112,617 

002 0601152N IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH 18,230 18,230 

003 0601153N DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES .................................... 484,459 484,459 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH .................................. 615,306 615,306 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

004 0602114N POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH ................. 104,513 104,513 

005 0602123N FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH ................. 145,307 145,307 

006 0602131M MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY ..... 47,334 47,334 

007 0602235N COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH .................... 34,163 34,163 

008 0602236N WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH 49,689 49,689 

009 0602271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH 97,701 97,701 

010 0602435N OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED 

RESEARCH.

45,685 60,685 

AGOR mid life refit ........................................................ [15,000 ] 

011 0602651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH.6,060 6,060 

012 0602747N UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH ............... 103,050 103,050 

013 0602750N FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH.169,710 169,710 

014 0602782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED 

RESEARCH.

31,326 31,326 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ............................ 834,538 849,538 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

015 0603114N POWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...... 48,201 48,201 

016 0603123N FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...... 28,328 28,328 

019 0603271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.56,179 56,179 

020 0603640M USMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION 

(ATD).

132,400 132,400 

021 0603651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.11,854 11,854 

022 0603673N FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.247,931 247,931 

023 0603729N WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.4,760 4,760 

025 0603758N NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS.51,463 51,463 

026 0603782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED 

TECHNOLOGY.

2,000 2,000 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.583,116 583,116 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & 

PROTOTYPES 

027 0603207N AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS ......................... 42,246 42,246 

028 0603216N AVIATION SURVIVABILITY .............................................. 5,591 5,591 

029 0603237N DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL ....... 3,262 3,262 

030 0603251N AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS .......................................................... 74 74 

031 0603254N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ...................................... 7,964 7,964 

032 0603261N TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE ................... 5,257 5,257 

033 0603382N ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY .......... 1,570 1,570 

034 0603502N SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES.168,040 168,040 

035 0603506N SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE ............................. 88,649 88,649 

036 0603512N CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .............................. 83,902 83,902 

037 0603525N PILOT FISH ........................................................................... 108,713 108,713 

038 0603527N RETRACT LARCH ................................................................ 9,316 9,316 
H. R. 3304—443 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

039 0603536N RETRACT JUNIPER ............................................................ 77,108 77,108 

040 0603542N RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL ............................................... 762 762 

041 0603553N SURFACE ASW ..................................................................... 2,349 2,349 

042 0603561N ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT ... 852,977 852,977 

043 0603562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS .............. 8,764 8,764 

044 0603563N SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN ............................. 20,501 20,501 

045 0603564N SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES.27,052 27,052 

046 0603570N ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS ..................... 428,933 428,933 

047 0603573N ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS ............ 27,154 22,902 

Program execution .......................................................... [–4,252 ] 

048 0603576N CHALK EAGLE ..................................................................... 519,140 519,140 

049 0603581N LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) ...................................... 406,389 406,389 

050 0603582N COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION ................................... 36,570 18,530 

Late contract awards ..................................................... [–18,040 ] 

051 0603609N CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS ......................................... 8,404 8,404 

052 0603611M MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES ........................... 136,967 122,967 

Program delay ................................................................ [–14,000 ] 

053 0603635M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM.1,489 1,489 

054 0603654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT.38,422 38,422 

055 0603658N COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT ........................................ 69,312 64,012 

Common array block antenna contract delay .............. [–5,300 ] 

056 0603713N OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.9,196 9,196 

057 0603721N ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION .................................... 18,850 18,850 

058 0603724N NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM ................................................ 45,618 45,618 

059 0603725N FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT ............................................ 3,019 3,019 

060 0603734N CHALK CORAL ..................................................................... 144,951 144,951 

061 0603739N NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY .................................... 5,797 5,797 

062 0603746N RETRACT MAPLE ................................................................ 308,131 308,131 

063 0603748N LINK PLUMERIA ................................................................. 195,189 195,189 

064 0603751N RETRACT ELM ..................................................................... 56,358 56,358 

065 0603764N LINK EVERGREEN .............................................................. 55,378 55,378 

066 0603787N SPECIAL PROCESSES ........................................................ 48,842 48,842 

067 0603790N NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ....................... 7,509 7,509 

068 0603795N LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY ......................................... 5,075 0 

Early to need .................................................................. [–5,075 ] 

069 0603851M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING .................... 51,178 51,178 

070 0603860N JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL.205,615 194,719 

JPALS 1B follow-on platform integration delay .......... [–7,437 ] 

JPALS 1B test early to need ......................................... [–3,459 ] 

072 0604272N TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM).37,227 37,227 

073 0604279N ASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION ...................... 169 169 

074 0604653N JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELECTRONIC WARFARE (JCREW).20,874 17,874 

Schedule delay ................................................................ [–3,000 ] 

075 0604659N PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.2,257 2,257 

076 0604707N SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING SUPPORT.38,327 38,327 

077 0604786N OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT.135,985 105,985 

Adjust program to more realistic schedule .................. [–30,000 ] 

078 0605812M JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 

PH.

50,362 50,362 

079 0303354N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP ........................... 8,448 4,908 

Program delay ................................................................ [–3,540 ] 

080 0304270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP .......... 153 153 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES.4,641,385 4,547,282 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 
H. R. 3304—444 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

081 0604212N OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT ........................................ 40,558 40,558 

082 0604214N AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV ........................................... 35,825 33,325 

Excess program management ........................................ [–2,500 ] 

083 0604215N STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT .......................................... 99,891 99,891 

084 0604216N MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT.17,565 17,565 

085 0604218N AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING ..................... 4,026 4,026 

086 0604221N P–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ................................... 1,791 1,791 

087 0604230N WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM .......................................... 11,725 11,725 

088 0604231N TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM ....................................... 68,463 68,463 

089 0604234N ADVANCED HAWKEYE ...................................................... 152,041 152,041 

090 0604245N H–1 UPGRADES ................................................................... 47,123 47,123 

091 0604261N ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS ......................................... 30,208 30,208 

092 0604262N V–22A ..................................................................................... 43,084 43,084 

093 0604264N AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ........................... 11,401 11,401 

094 0604269N EA–18 ..................................................................................... 11,138 11,138 

095 0604270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT .................... 34,964 34,964 

096 0604273N VH–71A EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT ................ 94,238 94,238 

097 0604274N NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) .............................. 257,796 257,796 

098 0604280N JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRSNAVY).3,302 3,302 

099 0604307N SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING.240,298 240,298 

100 0604311N LPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ...................... 1,214 1,214 

101 0604329N SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) ...................................... 46,007 46,007 

102 0604366N STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS .......................... 75,592 75,592 

103 0604373N AIRBORNE MCM .................................................................. 117,854 117,854 

104 0604376M MARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE (MAGTF) ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) FOR AVIATION.10,080 10,080 

105 0604378N NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER 

AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING.

21,413 21,413 

106 0604404N UNMANNED CARRIER LAUNCHED AIRBORNE SURVEILLANCE AND STRIKE (UCLASS) SYSTEM.146,683 133,683 

Schedule delay ................................................................ [–13,000 ] 

107 0604501N ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS ........................... 275,871 196,071 

Air and missile defense radar contract delay .............. [–79,800 ] 

108 0604503N SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION ................... 89,672 89,672 

109 0604504N AIR CONTROL ...................................................................... 13,754 13,754 

110 0604512N SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS ................................... 69,615 69,615 

112 0604558N NEW DESIGN SSN ............................................................... 121,566 121,566 

113 0604562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM ................ 49,143 49,143 

114 0604567N SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E .................. 155,254 175,254 

Increased LHA–8 design efforts .................................... [20,000 ] 

115 0604574N NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES .................. 3,689 3,689 

116 0604601N MINE DEVELOPMENT ....................................................... 5,041 5,041 

117 0604610N LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT .................. 26,444 26,444 

118 0604654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT.8,897 8,897 

119 0604703N PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND 

HUMAN FACTORS.

6,233 6,233 

120 0604727N JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS .......................... 442 442 

121 0604755N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) .............. 130,360 130,360 

122 0604756N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) .............. 50,209 50,209 

123 0604757N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW) ........ 164,799 114,799 

SEWIP block 3 program delay ...................................... [–50,000 ] 

124 0604761N INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING ...................................... 1,984 1,984 

125 0604771N MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT ................................................ 9,458 9,458 

126 0604777N NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM .................................................. 51,430 51,430 

127 0604800M JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD ............................ 512,631 502,631 

F–35B follow-on development ahead of need ............... [–10,000 ] 

128 0604800N JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD ............................ 534,187 524,187 

F–35B follow-on development ahead of need ............... [–10,000 ] 

129 0605013M INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .......... 5,564 5,564 

130 0605013N INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .......... 69,659 62,823 

Unjustified request ......................................................... [–6,836 ] 

132 0605212N CH–53K RDTE ...................................................................... 503,180 503,180 

133 0605450N JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) ..................... 5,500 0 
H. R. 3304—445 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Program uncertainty ...................................................... [–5,500 ] 

134 0605500N MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) ........... 317,358 287,358 

P–8A spiral 2 development milestone B slip ............... [–30,000 ] 

135 0204202N DDG–1000 .............................................................................. 187,910 187,910 

136 0304231N TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM—MIP ............................ 2,140 2,140 

137 0304785N TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS .............................. 9,406 9,406 

138 0305124N SPECIAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAM .............................. 22,800 22,800 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION.5,028,476 4,840,840 

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

139 0604256N THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT .......................... 43,261 43,261 

140 0604258N TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ............................... 71,872 71,872 

141 0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT ............................................... 38,033 38,033 

142 0605126N JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION.1,352 1,352 

143 0605152N STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY ................. 5,566 5,566 

144 0605154N CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES .................................... 48,345 48,345 

146 0605804N TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES ......................... 637 637 

147 0605853N MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL 

SUPPORT.

76,585 76,585 

148 0605856N STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT ................................ 3,221 3,221 

149 0605861N RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT.72,725 72,725 

150 0605863N RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT ........................ 141,778 141,778 

151 0605864N TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT ................................ 331,219 331,219 

152 0605865N OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY.16,565 16,565 

153 0605866N NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) 

SUPPORT.

3,265 3,265 

154 0605867N SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT 7,134 7,134 

155 0605873M MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT ................ 24,082 24,082 

156 0305885N TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC ACTIVITIES .......................... 497 497 

SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT .................... 886,137 886,137 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

159 0604227N HARPOON MODIFICATIONS ............................................. 699 699 

160 0604402N UNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV) ADVANCED COMPONENT AND PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT.

20,961 20,961 

162 0604766M MARINE CORPS DATA SYSTEMS .................................... 35 35 

163 0605525N CARRIER ONBOARD DELIVERY (COD) FOLLOW ON .. 2,460 2,460 

164 0605555N STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT ............................... 9,757 9,757 

165 0101221N STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT ..... 98,057 98,057 

166 0101224N SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ................. 31,768 31,768 

167 0101226N SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 1,464 1,464 

168 0101402N NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 21,729 21,729 

169 0203761N RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT) .................... 13,561 13,561 

170 0204136N F/A–18 SQUADRONS ........................................................... 131,118 131,118 

171 0204152N E–2 SQUADRONS ................................................................. 1,971 1,971 

172 0204163N FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL) ............. 46,155 34,423 

Joint Aerial Layer Network program delay ................. [–11,732 ] 

173 0204228N SURFACE SUPPORT ........................................................... 2,374 2,374 

174 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING 

CENTER (TMPC).

12,407 12,407 

175 0204311N INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM ....................... 41,609 41,609 

176 0204413N AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT).7,240 7,240 

177 0204460M GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) ....... 78,208 78,208 

178 0204571N CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.45,124 45,124 

179 0204574N CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT .................................. 2,703 2,703 

180 0204575N ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT 19,563 19,563 

181 0205601N HARM IMPROVEMENT ...................................................... 13,586 13,586 

182 0205604N TACTICAL DATA LINKS ..................................................... 197,538 197,538 

183 0205620N SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION ...... 31,863 31,863 

184 0205632N MK–48 ADCAP ...................................................................... 12,806 12,806 
H. R. 3304—446 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

185 0205633N AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS ............................................. 88,607 88,607 

187 0205675N OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS ............... 116,928 116,928 

188 0206313M MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS .......... 178,753 178,753 

189 0206623M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING 

ARMS SYSTEMS.

139,594 118,719 

Marine Personnel Carrier program deferred ............... [–20,875 ] 

190 0206624M MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT .......... 42,647 37,034 

Prior year carry over ...................................................... [–5,613 ] 

191 0206625M USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP).34,394 34,394 

192 0207161N TACTICAL AIM MISSILES ................................................. 39,159 31,159 

Program delay ................................................................ [–8,000 ] 

193 0207163N ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE 

(AMRAAM).

2,613 2,613 

194 0208058N JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV) .............................. 986 986 

199 0303109N SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) ..................... 66,231 66,231 

200 0303138N CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE 

SERVICES (CANES).

24,476 24,476 

201 0303140N INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ......... 23,531 23,531 

206 0305160N NAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORSSPACE (METOC).742 742 

207 0305192N MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES.4,804 4,804 

208 0305204N TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ................. 8,381 8,381 

211 0305208M DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.5,535 5,535 

212 0305208N DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.19,718 19,718 

213 0305220N RQ–4 UAV .............................................................................. 375,235 375,235 

214 0305231N MQ–8 UAV ............................................................................. 48,713 48,713 

215 0305232M RQ–11 UAV ............................................................................ 102 102 

216 0305233N RQ–7 UAV .............................................................................. 710 710 

217 0305234N SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0) .............. 5,013 5,013 

219 0305239M RQ–21A .................................................................................. 11,122 11,122 

220 0305241N MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT ...... 28,851 28,851 

221 0308601N MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT ..................... 5,116 5,116 

222 0702207N DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) .................................... 28,042 28,042 

223 0708011N INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ......................................... 50,933 50,933 

224 0708730N MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) ........................ 4,998 4,998 

224A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................... 1,185,132 1,185,132 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.3,385,822 3,339,602 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST 

& EVAL, NAVY.

15,974,780 15,661,821 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF 

BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601102F DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES .................................... 373,151 373,151 

002 0601103F UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES .......................... 138,333 138,333 

003 0601108F HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES ........ 13,286 13,286 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH .................................. 524,770 524,770 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

004 0602102F MATERIALS .......................................................................... 116,846 116,846 

005 0602201F AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES ....................... 119,672 119,672 

006 0602202F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH ......... 89,483 89,483 

007 0602203F AEROSPACE PROPULSION ............................................... 197,546 197,546 

008 0602204F AEROSPACE SENSORS ...................................................... 127,539 127,539 

009 0602601F SPACE TECHNOLOGY ........................................................ 104,063 104,063 

010 0602602F CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS ......................................... 81,521 81,521 

011 0602605F DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY ............................... 112,845 112,845 

012 0602788F DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS.138,161 138,161 

013 0602890F HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH ................................. 40,217 40,217 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ............................ 1,127,893 1,127,893 
H. R. 3304—447 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

014 0603112F ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS ..... 39,572 49,572 

Program increase ............................................................ [10,000 ] 

015 0603199F SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T) 12,800 12,800 

016 0603203F ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS ................................ 30,579 30,579 

017 0603211F AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO ....................... 77,347 77,347 

018 0603216F AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY.149,321 149,321 

019 0603270F ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY .......................... 49,128 49,128 

020 0603401F ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY .................... 68,071 68,071 

021 0603444F MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS) ........... 26,299 26,299 

022 0603456F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.20,967 20,967 

023 0603601F CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ................. 33,996 33,996 

024 0603605F ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY .......................... 19,000 19,000 

025 0603680F MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ............. 41,353 41,353 

026 0603788F BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND 

DEMONSTRATION.

49,093 49,093 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.617,526 627,526 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & 

PROTOTYPES 

028 0603260F INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT .............. 3,983 3,983 

029 0603287F PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ................................ 3,874 3,874 

032 0603438F SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY .................................... 27,024 27,024 

033 0603742F COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY .................. 15,899 15,899 

034 0603790F NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ....................... 4,568 4,568 

035 0603791F INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D ............ 379 379 

036 0603830F SPACE PROTECTION PROGRAM (SPP) ........................... 28,764 28,764 

038 0603851F INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/ 

VAL.

86,737 86,737 

040 0603859F POLLUTION PREVENTION—DEM/VAL .......................... 953 953 

042 0604015F LONG RANGE STRIKE ....................................................... 379,437 379,437 

044 0604317F TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER ................................................ 2,606 2,606 

045 0604327F HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM (HDBTDS) PROGRAM.103 103 

047 0604337F REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION ........ 16,018 16,018 

049 0604458F AIR & SPACE OPS CENTER .............................................. 58,861 58,861 

050 0604618F JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION ............................... 2,500 2,500 

051 0604635F GROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT 21,175 21,175 

052 0604857F OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE ........................ 10,000 

Program increase ............................................................ [10,000 ] 

053 0604858F TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM ........................................ 13,636 13,636 

054 0105921F SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES.2,799 2,799 

055 0207455F THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR 

(3DELRR).

70,160 70,160 

056 0305164F NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER 

EQUIPMENT) (SPACE).

137,233 137,233 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES.876,709 886,709 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

058 0603260F INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT .............. 977 977 

061 0604233F SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING 3,601 3,601 

062 0604270F ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ..................... 1,971 1,971 

064 0604281F TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE ................. 51,456 51,456 

065 0604287F PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ................................ 50 50 

066 0604329F SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)—EMD ......................... 115,000 115,000 

067 0604421F COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS .............................................. 23,930 23,930 

068 0604425F SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS ................. 400,258 400,258 

069 0604429F AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK ................................. 4,575 4,575 

070 0604441F SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH 

EMD.

352,532 322,832 

Modernization projects execution delays excluding exploitation efforts.[–29,700 ] 
H. R. 3304—448 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

071 0604602F ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT .................... 16,284 16,284 

072 0604604F SUBMUNITIONS .................................................................. 2,564 2,564 

073 0604617F AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT ................................................ 17,036 17,036 

074 0604706F LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS .................................................. 7,273 7,273 

075 0604735F COMBAT TRAINING RANGES ........................................... 33,200 33,200 

078 0604800F F–35—EMD ............................................................................ 816,335 816,335 

079 0604851F INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—EMD ..... 145,442 145,442 

080 0604853F EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE)—EMD.27,963 27,963 

081 0604932F LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON ............................... 5,000 5,000 

082 0604933F ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION ......................................... 129,411 129,411 

083 0605213F F–22 MODERNIZATION INCREMENT 3.2B .................... 131,100 131,100 

084 0605221F KC–46 ..................................................................................... 1,558,590 1,558,590 

085 0605229F CSAR HH–60 RECAPITALIZATION .................................. 393,558 333,558 

Program delays / projected savings pending updated 

program estimate.

[–60,000 ] 

086 0605278F HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E ............................................... 6,242 6,242 

087 0605431F ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) ......................... 272,872 272,872 

088 0605432F POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) ........................................... 124,805 124,805 

089 0605433F WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE) ......................... 13,948 13,948 

090 0605931F B–2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .................... 303,500 303,500 

091 0101125F NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION ....................... 67,874 67,874 

094 0207701F FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING .............................. 4,663 4,663 

097 0401318F CV–22 ..................................................................................... 46,705 46,705 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION.

5,078,715 4,989,015 

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

099 0604256F THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT .......................... 17,690 17,690 

100 0604759F MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT ............................................... 34,841 34,841 

101 0605101F RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE ............................................. 32,956 32,956 

103 0605712F INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION ........... 13,610 13,610 

104 0605807F TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT ................................ 742,658 742,658 

105 0605860F ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) ....... 14,203 14,203 

106 0605864F SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP) .......................................... 13,000 13,000 

107 0605976F FACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION— 

TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT.

44,160 44,160 

108 0605978F FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT.27,643 27,643 

109 0606323F MULTI-SERVICE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INITIATIVE.13,935 13,935 

110 0606392F SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN 

WORKFORCE.

192,348 192,348 

111 0702806F ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ............. 28,647 28,647 

112 0804731F GENERAL SKILL TRAINING ............................................. 315 315 

114 1001004F INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES ......................................... 3,785 3,785 

SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT .................... 1,179,791 1,179,791 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

115 0603423F GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL 

CONTROL SEGMENT.

383,500 383,500 

117 0604445F WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE ........................................... 5,000 5,000 

118 0605018F AF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM 

(AF-IPPS).

90,097 90,097 

119 0605024F ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY 32,086 32,086 

121 0101113F B–52 SQUADRONS ............................................................... 24,007 24,007 

122 0101122F AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) ................... 450 450 

123 0101126F B–1B SQUADRONS .............................................................. 19,589 19,589 

124 0101127F B–2 SQUADRONS ................................................................. 100,194 100,194 

125 0101313F STRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM—USSTRATCOM ...... 37,448 37,448 

128 0102326F REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER 

MODERNIZATION PROGRAM.

1,700 1,700 

130 0203761F WARFIGHTER RAPID ACQUISITION PROCESS 

(WRAP) RAPID TRANSITION FUND.

3,844 3,844 

131 0205219F MQ–9 UAV ............................................................................. 128,328 128,328 

133 0207131F A–10 SQUADRONS ............................................................... 9,614 9,614 

134 0207133F F–16 SQUADRONS ............................................................... 177,298 177,298 
H. R. 3304—449 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

135 0207134F F–15E SQUADRONS ............................................................ 244,289 244,289 

136 0207136F MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION ...................... 13,138 13,138 

137 0207138F F–22A SQUADRONS ............................................................ 328,542 328,542 

138 0207142F F–35 SQUADRONS ............................................................... 33,000 33,000 

139 0207161F TACTICAL AIM MISSILES ................................................. 15,460 15,460 

140 0207163F ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE 

(AMRAAM).

84,172 84,172 

142 0207224F COMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY ............................... 2,582 2,582 

143 0207227F COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE .................................. 542 542 

144 0207247F AF TENCAP ........................................................................... 89,816 89,816 

145 0207249F PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT ......... 1,075 1,075 

146 0207253F COMPASS CALL ................................................................... 10,782 10,782 

147 0207268F AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT 

PROGRAM.

139,369 139,369 

149 0207325F JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE 

(JASSM).

6,373 6,373 

150 0207410F AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) ................. 22,820 22,820 

151 0207412F CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC) ................ 7,029 7,029 

152 0207417F AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM 

(AWACS).

186,256 186,256 

153 0207418F TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS ................. 743 743 

156 0207431F COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES .. 4,471 4,471 

158 0207444F TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD .......................... 10,250 10,250 

159 0207448F C2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK ........................................... 1,431 1,431 

160 0207449F COMMAND AND CONTROL (C2) CONSTELLATION ..... 7,329 7,329 

161 0207452F DCAPES ................................................................................. 15,081 15,081 

162 0207581F JOINT SURVEILLANCE/TARGET ATTACK RADAR 

SYSTEM (JSTARS).

13,248 23,148 

Continue T–3 testing operations ................................... [9,900 ] 

163 0207590F SEEK EAGLE ........................................................................ 24,342 24,342 

164 0207601F USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION ............................ 10,448 10,448 

165 0207605F WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS ................. 5,512 5,512 

166 0207697F DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES ................. 3,301 3,301 

167 0208006F MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS ....................................... 62,605 62,605 

169 0208059F CYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES ....................................... 68,099 68,099 

170 0208087F AF OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS ............... 14,047 14,047 

171 0208088F AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS ............... 5,853 5,853 

179 0301400F SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE .......................... 12,197 12,197 

180 0302015F E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER 

(NAOC).

18,267 18,267 

181 0303131F MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN).36,288 36,288 

182 0303140F INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ......... 90,231 100,231 

ASACoE program ........................................................... [10,000 ] 

183 0303141F GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................... 725 725 

185 0303601F MILSATCOM TERMINALS ................................................. 140,170 140,170 

187 0304260F AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE .................................... 117,110 117,110 

190 0305099F GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM) ........... 4,430 4,430 

191 0305103F CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ........................................ 2,048 2,048 

192 0305105F DOD CYBER CRIME CENTER ........................................... 288 288 

193 0305110F SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) ................... 35,698 35,698 

194 0305111F WEATHER SERVICE ........................................................... 24,667 24,667 

195 0305114F AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING 

SYSTEM (ATCALS).

35,674 35,674 

196 0305116F AERIAL TARGETS ............................................................... 21,186 21,186 

199 0305128F SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES ............. 195 195 

200 0305145F ARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION ............................. 1,430 1,430 

201 0305146F DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.330 330 

206 0305173F SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER.3,696 3,696 

207 0305174F SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID 

TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.

2,469 2,469 

208 0305179F INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) ................... 8,289 8,289 

209 0305182F SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) ............................ 13,345 13,345 

211 0305202F DRAGON U–2 ........................................................................ 18,700 18,700 

212 0305205F ENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ........... 3,000 3,000 
H. R. 3304—450 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

213 0305206F AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS .................... 37,828 50,328 

Blue Devil Replacement WAMI/NVDF ......................... [12,500 ] 

214 0305207F MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS ....................... 13,491 13,491 

215 0305208F DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.7,498 7,498 

216 0305219F MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV ................................................... 3,326 3,326 

217 0305220F RQ–4 UAV .............................................................................. 134,406 114,406 

Multiple execution delays .............................................. [–20,000 ] 

218 0305221F NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING 7,413 7,413 

219 0305236F COMMON DATA LINK (CDL) ............................................. 40,503 40,503 

220 0305238F NATO AGS ............................................................................. 264,134 264,134 

221 0305240F SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE ................................... 23,016 23,016 

222 0305265F GPS III SPACE SEGMENT ................................................. 221,276 221,276 

223 0305614F JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM .................................................. 58,523 58,523 

224 0305881F RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION ........................................... 2,218 2,218 

226 0305913F NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE) .......................... 50,547 50,547 

227 0305940F SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS .......... 18,807 18,807 

229 0308699F SHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW) .................................. 1,079 1,079 

230 0401115F C–130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON .............................................. 400 73,700 

C–130 AMP ..................................................................... [47,300 ] 

C–130H Propulsion System Propeller Upgrades ......... [26,000 ] 

231 0401119F C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF) ......................................... 61,492 61,492 

232 0401130F C–17 AIRCRAFT (IF) ............................................................ 109,134 109,134 

233 0401132F C–130J PROGRAM ............................................................... 22,443 22,443 

234 0401134F LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES 

(LAIRCM).

4,116 4,116 

238 0401314F OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT ................................. 44,553 44,553 

239 0408011F SPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL ....................... 6,213 6,213 

240 0702207F DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) .................................... 1,605 1,605 

242 0708610F LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) ... 95,238 95,238 

243 0708611F SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ............................. 10,925 10,925 

244 0804743F OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING ............................................... 1,347 1,347 

245 0808716F OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES ................................... 65 65 

246 0901202F JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY ..................... 1,083 1,083 

247 0901218F CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM .......................... 1,577 1,577 

248 0901220F PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION ..................................... 5,990 5,990 

249 0901226F AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY .......... 786 786 

250 0901279F FACILITIES OPERATION—ADMINISTRATIVE .............. 654 654 

251 0901538F FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.135,735 135,735 

252A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................... 11,874,528 11,874,528 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.16,297,542 16,383,242 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST 

& EVAL, AF.

25,702,946 25,718,946 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW 

BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601000BR DTRA BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVE ............................. 45,837 45,837 

002 0601101E DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES .................................... 315,033 315,033 

003 0601110D8Z BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES ...................................... 11,171 11,171 

004 0601117E BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH 

SCIENCE.

49,500 49,500 

005 0601120D8Z NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM ............ 84,271 84,271 

006 0601228D8Z HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS.30,895 35,895 

Program increase ............................................................ [5,000 ] 

007 0601384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 51,426 51,426 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH .................................. 588,133 593,133 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

008 0602000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY ................................. 20,065 20,065 

009 0602115E BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ............................................ 114,790 114,790 

011 0602234D8Z LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM ......... 46,875 41,875 

MIT LL reduction ........................................................... [–5,000 ] 
H. R. 3304—451 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

013 0602251D8Z APPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF 

S&T PRIORITIES.

45,000 40,000 

PSC S&T reduction ........................................................ [–5,000 ] 

014 0602303E INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY 413,260 415,760 

Plan X increase ............................................................... [2,500 ] 

015 0602304E COGNITIVE COMPUTING SYSTEMS ............................... 16,330 16,330 

017 0602383E BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE ................................. 24,537 24,537 

018 0602384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 227,065 217,065 

Program decrease ........................................................... [–10,000 ] 

020 0602668D8Z CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH ......................................... 18,908 18,908 

021 0602670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) APPLIED RESEARCH.2,500 

HSCB Apl Res extension ............................................... [2,500 ] 

022 0602702E TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY ................................................. 225,977 225,977 

023 0602715E MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY ........... 166,654 166,654 

024 0602716E ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY ......................................... 243,469 243,469 

025 0602718BR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES.175,282 175,282 

026 0602751D8Z SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH.11,107 11,107 

027 1160401BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.29,246 29,246 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ............................ 1,778,565 1,763,565 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

028 0603000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .......... 26,646 21,646 

Program decrease ........................................................... [–5,000 ] 

029 0603121D8Z SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT .............................. 19,420 19,420 

030 0603122D8Z COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT .. 77,792 77,792 

031 0603160BR COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES—PROLIFERATION PREVENTION AND DEFEAT.274,033 274,033 

032 0603175C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ............ 309,203 214,203 

Advanced Technology—unsustainable growth ............. [–20,000 ] 

Common Kill VehicleTechnology—transfer to line 

032X.

[–70,000 ] 

Directed energy—DPALS .............................................. [–5,000 ] 

032X 0603XXXC COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY ...................... 100,000 

Common Kill Vehicle Technology—transfer from line 

032.

[70,000 ] 

Increase for CKVT design and development ................ [30,000 ] 

034 0603225D8Z JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.19,305 19,305 

035 0603264S AGILE TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY 

(AT21)—THEATER CAPABILITY.

7,565 7,565 

036 0603274C SPECIAL PROGRAM—MDA TECHNOLOGY ................... 40,426 40,426 

037 0603286E ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS ................................ 149,804 149,804 

038 0603287E SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY ........................ 172,546 172,546 

039 0603384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.170,847 170,847 

040 0603618D8Z JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ........ 9,009 9,009 

041 0603648D8Z JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS.174,428 167,428 

Decrease to Strategic Capabilities Office efforts ......... [–7,000 ] 

042 0603662D8Z NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES ..... 20,000 5,000 

Net Comm reduction ...................................................... [–15,000 ] 

045 0603668D8Z CYBER SECURITY ADVANCED RESEARCH .................. 19,668 19,668 

046 0603670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.2,500 

HSCB Adv Dev extension .............................................. [2,500 ] 

047 0603680D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND 

TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM.

34,041 59,041 

IBIF ................................................................................. [25,000 ] 

048 0603699D8Z EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.61,971 53,971 

Decrease to Strategic Capabilities Office efforts ......... [–8,000 ] 

050 0603712S GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS.20,000 20,000 
H. R. 3304—452 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

051 0603713S DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE 

TECHNOLOGY.

30,256 30,256 

052 0603716D8Z STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM.72,324 72,324 

053 0603720S MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT.82,700 82,700 

054 0603727D8Z JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM ................................... 8,431 8,431 

055 0603739E ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES .............. 117,080 117,080 

057 0603760E COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS.239,078 239,078 

059 0603766E NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY .......... 259,006 259,006 

060 0603767E SENSOR TECHNOLOGY ..................................................... 286,364 286,364 

061 0603769SE DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.12,116 12,116 

062 0603781D8Z SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE ........................ 19,008 19,008 

063 0603826D8Z QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS ........................ 78,532 68,532 

Quick & Rapid Reaction Fund reduction ..................... [–10,000 ] 

065 0603828J JOINT EXPERIMENTATION .............................................. 12,667 12,667 

066 0603832D8Z DOD MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE.

41,370 41,370 

069 0603941D8Z TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ...... 92,508 92,508 

070 0604055D8Z OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT.52,001 52,001 

071 0303310D8Z CWMD SYSTEMS ................................................................. 52,053 55,053 

Program increase ............................................................ [3,000 ] 

072 1160402BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 

DEVELOPMENT.

46,809 46,809 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.3,109,007 3,099,507 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND 

PROTOTYPES 

075 0603161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E ADC&P.63,641 63,641 

076 0603527D8Z RETRACT LARCH ................................................................ 19,152 19,152 

077 0603600D8Z WALKOFF ............................................................................. 70,763 70,763 

079 0603714D8Z ADVANCED SENSORS APPLICATION PROGRAM ........ 17,230 19,230 

Sustain testing effort ..................................................... [2,000 ] 

080 0603851D8Z ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM.71,453 71,453 

081 0603881C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE 

SEGMENT.

268,990 268,990 

082 0603882C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT.1,033,903 1,133,903 

Continue activities relative to site evaluation, EIS, 

and planning.

[20,000 ] 

FTG-07 failure review board and return to flight ....... [80,000 ] 

083 0603884BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL.196,237 196,237 

084 0603884C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS ..................... 315,183 395,183 

Additional homeland missile defense radar ................. [30,000 ] 

Enhanced discrimination capability ............................. [50,000 ] 

086 0603890C BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS ........................................... 377,605 377,605 

087 0603891C SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA ............................................. 286,613 286,613 

088 0603892C AEGIS BMD ........................................................................... 937,056 937,056 

089 0603893C SPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .......... 44,947 44,947 

090 0603895C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS.6,515 6,515 

091 0603896C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND 

CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND 

COMMUNICATI.

418,355 418,355 

092 0603898C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER 

SUPPORT.

47,419 47,419 

093 0603904C MISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS 

CENTER (MDIOC).

52,131 52,131 

094 0603906C REGARDING TRENCH ........................................................ 13,864 13,864 

095 0603907C SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) .................................. 44,478 44,478 
H. R. 3304—453 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

096 0603913C ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS .............................. 95,782 283,782 

Arrow Weapon System Improvements ......................... [33,700 ] 

Arrow–3 Interceptor ....................................................... [22,100 ] 

David’s Sling short-range BMD .................................... [117,200 ] 

US co-production capability for Iron Dome parts and 

components.

[15,000 ] 

097 0603914C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST ............................. 375,866 375,866 

098 0603915C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS ..................... 495,257 495,257 

099 0603920D8Z HUMANITARIAN DEMINING ............................................ 11,704 11,704 

100 0603923D8Z COALITION WARFARE ....................................................... 9,842 9,842 

101 0604016D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM 3,312 13,312 

Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation ............ [10,000 ] 

102 0604250D8Z ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES ................. 130,000 100,000 

Decrease to SCO efforts ................................................. [–30,000 ] 

103 0604400D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) COMMON DEVELOPMENT.8,300 8,300 

104 0604445J WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE ........................................... 30,000 30,000 

105 0604670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING.2,500 

HSCB Modeling R&E extension .................................... [2,500 ] 

106 0604775D8Z DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM ................... 200,000 

Rapid Innovation Program ............................................ [200,000 ] 

108 0604787J JOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ...................................... 7,402 7,402 

110 0604828J JOINT FIRES INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY TEAM.

7,506 7,506 

111 0604880C LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3) ............................................ 129,374 129,374 

112 0604881C AEGIS SM–3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT ............... 308,522 308,522 

115 0303191D8Z JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) 

PROGRAM.

3,169 3,169 

116 0305103C CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ........................................ 946 946 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES.5,902,517 6,455,017 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 

118 0604161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD.8,155 8,155 

119 0604165D8Z PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT.65,440 65,440 

120 0604384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD.451,306 451,306 

122 0604764K ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE 

(AITS-JPO).

29,138 29,138 

123 0604771D8Z JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION 

SYSTEM (JTIDS).

19,475 19,475 

124 0605000BR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES.12,901 12,901 

125 0605013BL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .......... 13,812 13,812 

126 0605021SE HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE ...... 386 386 

127 0605022D8Z DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM .......................... 3,763 3,763 

128 0605027D8Z OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES .................... 6,788 6,788 

129 0605070S DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND 

DEMONSTRATION.

27,917 27,917 

130 0605075D8Z DCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION ................................ 22,297 22,297 

131 0605080S DEFENSE AGENCY INTIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL 

SYSTEM.

51,689 51,689 

132 0605210D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES.6,184 6,184 

133 0303141K GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................... 12,083 12,083 

134 0305304D8Z DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM).3,302 3,302 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION.734,636 734,636 

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

135 0604774D8Z DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS) 6,393 6,393 

136 0604875D8Z JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT ... 2,479 2,479 
H. R. 3304—454 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

137 0604940D8Z CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT 

DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP).

240,213 240,213 

138 0604942D8Z ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS .............................. 2,127 2,127 

139 0604943D8Z THERMAL VICAR ................................................................ 8,287 8,287 

140 0605100D8Z JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY 

(JMETC).

31,000 31,000 

141 0605104D8Z TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS ...... 24,379 24,379 

143 0605117D8Z FOREIGN MATERIEL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION.54,311 54,311 

144 0605126J JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE 

ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO).

47,462 47,462 

146 0605130D8Z FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING ............................... 12,134 12,134 

147 0605142D8Z SYSTEMS ENGINEERING .................................................. 44,237 44,237 

148 0605151D8Z STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD ................... 5,871 5,871 

149 0605161D8Z NUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY ................. 5,028 5,028 

150 0605170D8Z SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION.6,301 6,301 

151 0605200D8Z GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) .......... 6,504 6,504 

152 0605384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 92,046 92,046 

158 0605790D8Z SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ 

SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (S.

1,868 1,868 

159 0605798D8Z DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS .............................. 8,362 8,362 

160 0605801KA DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER 

(DTIC).

56,024 56,024 

161 0605803SE R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING 

AND EVALUATION.

6,908 6,908 

162 0605804D8Z DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION .................... 15,451 19,451 

Program increase ............................................................ [4,000 ] 

164 0605898E MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D ................................................. 71,659 71,659 

165 0606100D8Z BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS ..................... 4,083 4,083 

167 0203345D8Z DEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE 

(DOSI).

5,306 5,306 

168 0204571J JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT ........................... 2,097 2,097 

172 0303166J SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES.8,394 8,394 

175 0305193D8Z CYBER INTELLIGENCE ..................................................... 7,624 7,624 

178 0804767D8Z COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING 

TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2).

43,247 43,247 

179 0901598C MANAGEMENT HQ—MDA ................................................. 37,712 37,712 

180 0901598D8W MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS WHS ......................... 607 607 

181A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................... 54,914 54,914 

SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT .................... 913,028 917,028 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 

182 0604130V ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS) ........................ 7,552 7,552 

183 0605127T REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND 

PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE INFORMATION MANA.

3,270 3,270 

184 0605147T OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED 

INFORMATION SYSTEM (OHASIS).

287 287 

185 0607210D8Z INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT 

SUPPORT.

14,000 14,000 

186 0607310D8Z OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ................... 1,955 1,955 

187 0607327T GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS).13,250 13,250 

188 0607384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT).13,026 13,026 

190 0607828J JOINT INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY ........ 12,652 12,652 

191 0208043J PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS) ........ 3,061 3,061 

192 0208045K C4I INTEROPERABILITY ................................................... 72,726 72,726 

194 0301144K JOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING 6,524 6,524 

201 0302016K NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE 

SUPPORT.

512 512 

202 0302019K DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING 

AND INTEGRATION.

12,867 12,867 

203 0303126K LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS ........................ 36,565 36,565 

204 0303131K MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN).13,144 13,144 
H. R. 3304—455 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

205 0303135G PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI) .......................... 1,060 1,060 

206 0303136G KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI) ........... 33,279 33,279 

207 0303140D8Z INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ......... 10,673 10,673 

208 0303140G INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ......... 181,567 181,567 

210 0303150K GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM ............. 34,288 34,288 

211 0303153K DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION ......................... 7,741 7,741 

212 0303170K NET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) .......... 3,325 3,325 

213 0303260D8Z DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE 

(DMDPO).

1,246 1,246 

214 0303610K TELEPORT PROGRAM ........................................................ 5,147 5,147 

216 0304210BB SPECIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES ........ 17,352 17,352 

220 0305103K CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ........................................ 3,658 3,658 

221 0305125D8Z CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION (CIP) ..... 9,752 9,752 

225 0305186D8Z POLICY R&D PROGRAMS .................................................. 3,210 4,210 

CRRC extension .............................................................. [1,000 ] 

227 0305199D8Z NET CENTRICITY ................................................................ 21,602 21,602 

230 0305208BB DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.5,195 5,195 

233 0305208K DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.3,348 3,348 

235 0305219BB MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV ................................................... 641 641 

238 0305387D8Z HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 

PROGRAM.

2,338 2,338 

239 0305600D8Z INTERNATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY 

AND ARCHITECTURES.

4,372 4,372 

247 0708011S INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ......................................... 24,691 24,691 

248 0708012S LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES .................................. 4,659 4,659 

249 0902298J MANAGEMENT HQ—OJCS ................................................ 3,533 3,533 

250 1105219BB MQ–9 UAV ............................................................................. 1,314 13,314 

Capability Improvements .............................................. [12,000 ] 

254 1160403BB AVIATION SYSTEMS ........................................................... 156,561 156,561 

256 1160405BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS 

DEVELOPMENT.

7,705 7,705 

257 1160408BB SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS .......................... 42,620 42,620 

261 1160431BB WARRIOR SYSTEMS ........................................................... 17,970 17,970 

262 1160432BB SPECIAL PROGRAMS ......................................................... 7,424 7,424 

268 1160480BB SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES ................................................ 2,206 2,206 

271 1160483BB MARITIME SYSTEMS ......................................................... 18,325 19,481 

CCFLIR—Transfer at USSOCOM Request ................. [1,156 ] 

274 1160489BB SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES .... 3,304 3,304 

275 1160490BB SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE.16,021 16,021 

275A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................... 3,773,704 3,773,704 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT.4,641,222 4,655,378 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST 

& EVAL, DW.

17,667,108 18,218,264 

OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE 

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

001 0605118OTE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION ...................... 75,720 75,720 

002 0605131OTE LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION .............................. 48,423 48,423 

003 0605814OTE OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES .... 62,157 62,157 

SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT .................... 186,300 186,300 

TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE.186,300 186,300 

TOTAL RDT&E ........................................................ 67,520,236 67,739,463 
H. R. 3304—456 

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

087 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES ..................... 7,000 7,000 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION.7,000 7,000 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, ARMY.

7,000 7,000 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

224A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ..................................................... 34,426 34,426 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.34,426 34,426 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, NAVY.

34,426 34,426 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

252A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ..................................................... 9,000 9,000 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.9,000 9,000 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, AF.

9,000 9,000 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 

275A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ..................................................... 66,208 66,208 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT.66,208 66,208 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, DW.

66,208 66,208 

TOTAL RDT&E .......................................................... 116,634 116,634 

TITLE XLIII—OPERATION AND 

MAINTENANCE 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ....................................................... 888,114 1,059,114 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [171,000 ] 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ............................... 72,624 72,624 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE .................................... 617,402 617,402 

040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS .......................................... 602,262 602,262 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................. 1,032,484 1,032,484 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ........................................................ 1,287,462 1,303,262 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [15,800 ] 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ......... 3,559,656 3,768,656 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [209,000 ] 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS ..................... 454,477 454,477 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................. 1,481,156 1,706,156 
H. R. 3304—457 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [225,000 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................... 7,278,154 7,278,154 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 2,754,712 3,011,712 

Realignment of Arlington National Cemetary operations .................................................................. [–25,000 ] 

Sustainment to 90% ................................................. [282,000 ] 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ’S ............. 425,271 425,271 

130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS 185,064 185,064 

170 COMBATANT COMMANDERS ANCILLARY MISSIONS ........................................................................... 463,270 463,270 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................. 21,102,108 21,979,908 

MOBILIZATION 

180 STRATEGIC MOBILITY ................................................ 360,240 360,240 

190 ARMY PREPOSITIONING STOCKS ............................ 192,105 192,105 

200 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS .................................. 7,101 7,101 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ............................. 559,446 559,446 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

210 OFFICER ACQUISITION .............................................. 115,992 115,992 

220 RECRUIT TRAINING .................................................... 52,323 52,323 

230 ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING ................................ 43,589 43,589 

240 SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS .. 453,745 453,745 

250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ................................ 1,034,495 1,034,495 

260 FLIGHT TRAINING ....................................................... 1,016,876 1,016,876 

270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..... 186,565 186,565 

280 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................... 652,514 652,514 

290 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 485,500 485,500 

300 EXAMINING ................................................................... 170,912 170,912 

310 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION ............ 251,523 251,523 

320 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING .................. 184,422 184,422 

330 JUNIOR ROTC ................................................................ 181,105 181,105 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .. 4,829,561 4,829,561 

ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 

350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ........................... 690,089 690,089 

360 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES ................................. 774,120 774,120 

370 LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES .............................. 651,765 651,765 

380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT .................................. 453,051 453,051 

390 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 487,737 487,737 

400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 1,563,115 1,563,115 

410 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ...................................... 326,853 326,853 

420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ................................. 234,364 234,364 

430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT ........................................ 1,212,091 1,212,091 

440 ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES ........................................ 243,540 243,540 

450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT .................................. 241,101 241,101 

460 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................... 226,291 226,291 

470 SUPPORT OF NATO OPERATIONS ............................ 426,651 457,851 

Realignment of NATO Special Operations Headquarters from O&M Defense-wide ...................... [31,200 ] 

480 MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS ..................... 27,248 27,248 

525 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................. 1,023,946 1,023,946 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES ...................................................................... 8,581,962 8,613,162 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

530 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –284,300 

Average civilian end strength above projection ..... [–284,300 ] 
H. R. 3304—458 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... –284,300 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ARMY ................................................................ 35,073,077 35,697,777 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ....................................................... 1,621 1,621 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ............................... 24,429 24,429 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE .................................... 657,099 657,099 

040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS .......................................... 122,485 122,485 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................. 584,058 584,058 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ........................................................ 79,380 79,380 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ......... 471,616 471,616 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS ..................... 74,243 74,243 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................. 70,894 146,694 

Army Reserve identified shortfall—restore unjustified efficiency reduction ................................ [75,800 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................... 569,801 569,801 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 294,145 330,545 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [36,400 ] 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ’S ............. 51,853 51,853 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................. 3,001,624 3,113,824 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ........................... 10,735 10,735 

140 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 24,197 24,197 

150 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 10,304 10,304 

160 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ...................................... 10,319 10,319 

170 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 37,857 37,857 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 93,412 93,412 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ARMY RES ....................................................... 3,095,036 3,207,236 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ....................................................... 800,880 800,880 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ............................... 178,650 178,650 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE .................................... 771,503 771,503 

040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS .......................................... 98,699 98,699 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................. 38,779 38,779 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ........................................................ 922,503 922,503 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ......... 761,056 761,056 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS ..................... 62,971 62,971 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................. 233,105 233,105 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................... 1,019,059 1,019,059 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 712,139 786,339 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [74,200 ] 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ’S ............. 1,013,715 1,000,418 

Army National Guard identified severance pay 

excess to requirement .......................................... [–13,297 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................. 6,613,059 6,673,962 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ........................... 10,812 10,812 

140 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT .................................. 1,551 1,551 
H. R. 3304—459 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

150 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 78,284 78,284 

160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 46,995 46,995 

170 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ...................................... 6,390 6,390 

180 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 297,105 297,105 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 441,137 441,137 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

190 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –15,000 

Unjustified Growth For Civilian Personnel Compensation ............................................................... [–15,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... –15,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ARNG ................................................................ 7,054,196 7,100,099 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ........ 4,952,522 4,985,022 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [32,500 ] 

020 FLEET AIR TRAINING ................................................. 1,826,404 1,826,404 

030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING 

SERVICES ................................................................... 38,639 38,639 

040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT ............. 90,030 90,030 

050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT ............................................. 362,700 362,700 

060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE .......................... 915,881 955,881 

Navy Unfunded Requirement for Air Depot Maintenance .................................................................. [40,000 ] 

070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............ 35,838 35,838 

080 AVIATION LOGISTICS .................................................. 379,914 379,914 

090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ............. 3,884,836 3,995,736 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [99,500 ] 

Spares ....................................................................... [11,400 ] 

100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ........... 734,852 734,852 

110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................... 5,191,511 5,191,511 

120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ...................... 1,351,274 1,381,274 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [30,000 ] 

130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS .................................... 701,316 701,316 

140 ELECTRONIC WARFARE ............................................. 97,710 97,710 

150 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE .................. 172,330 172,330 

160 WARFARE TACTICS ...................................................... 454,682 454,682 

170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY ......................................................................... 328,406 328,406 

180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ...................................... 946,429 1,083,297 

Navy Unfunded Requirement for Navy Expeditionary Combat Enterprise Reset/Depot ............. [148,000 ] 

Unjustified growth for human resources functions [–11,132 ] 

190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE .................................... 142,249 142,249 

200 DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................ 2,603 2,603 

210 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS 102,970 102,970 

220 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION 

SUPPORT ..................................................................... 199,128 199,128 

230 CRUISE MISSILE ........................................................... 92,671 92,671 

240 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE ....................................... 1,193,188 1,193,188 

250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT ......... 105,985 105,985 

260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE ......................................... 532,627 532,627 

270 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT ..................... 304,160 304,160 

280 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ..................................... 1,011,528 1,011,528 

290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION .............................................................. 1,996,821 2,132,821 
H. R. 3304—460 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [136,000 ] 

300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..................................... 4,460,918 4,460,918 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................. 32,610,122 33,096,390 

MOBILIZATION 

310 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE ...................... 331,576 331,576 

320 AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS ............ 6,638 6,638 

330 SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS ...................... 222,752 222,752 

340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS .. 73,310 73,310 

350 INDUSTRIAL READINESS ........................................... 2,675 2,675 

360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT ........................................... 23,794 23,794 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ............................. 660,745 660,745 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

370 OFFICER ACQUISITION .............................................. 148,516 148,516 

380 RECRUIT TRAINING .................................................... 9,384 9,384 

390 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS .................. 139,876 139,876 

400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ................................ 630,069 630,069 

410 FLIGHT TRAINING ....................................................... 9,294 9,294 

420 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..... 169,082 169,082 

430 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................... 164,368 164,368 

440 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 241,733 242,833 

Naval Sea Cadets ..................................................... [1,100 ] 

450 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION ............ 139,815 139,815 

460 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING .................. 94,632 94,632 

470 JUNIOR ROTC ................................................................ 51,373 51,373 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .. 1,798,142 1,799,242 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

480 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 886,088 886,088 

490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS .............................................. 13,131 13,131 

500 CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................................................................... 115,742 115,742 

510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................................................................... 382,150 382,150 

520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ................................. 268,403 268,403 

530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 317,293 317,293 

550 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ........................... 207,128 207,128 

570 PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN .............. 295,855 295,855 

580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ..... 1,140,484 1,140,484 

590 HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT ............................................................................ 52,873 52,873 

600 COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS ................................... 27,587 27,587 

610 SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS ... 75,728 75,728 

620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE ............................ 543,026 543,026 

680 INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES ............................................................................. 4,965 4,965 

705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................. 545,775 545,775 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 4,876,228 4,876,228 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

710 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –30,000 

Average civilian end strength above projection ..... [–30,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... –30,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

NAVY ................................................................. 39,945,237 40,402,605 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE 

CORPS 
H. R. 3304—461 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATIONAL FORCES .............................................. 837,012 912,012 

Crisis Response Force .............................................. [40,000 ] 

Marine Security Guard ............................................ [35,000 ] 

020 FIELD LOGISTICS ......................................................... 894,555 894,555 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 223,337 279,337 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [56,000 ] 

040 MARITIME PREPOSITIONING .................................... 97,878 97,878 

050 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ............................................................................. 774,619 774,619 

060 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..................................... 2,166,661 2,166,661 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................. 4,994,062 5,125,062 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

070 RECRUIT TRAINING .................................................... 17,693 17,693 

080 OFFICER ACQUISITION .............................................. 896 896 

090 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ................................ 100,806 100,806 

100 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..... 46,928 46,928 

110 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................... 356,426 356,426 

120 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 179,747 179,747 

130 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION ............ 52,255 52,255 

140 JUNIOR ROTC ................................................................ 23,138 23,138 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .. 777,889 777,889 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

150 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ........................... 43,816 43,816 

160 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 305,107 305,107 

180 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ..... 87,500 87,500 

185 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................. 46,276 46,276 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 482,699 482,699 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

MARINE CORPS ............................................ 6,254,650 6,385,650 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ........ 586,620 588,520 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [1,900 ] 

020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE .............................. 7,008 7,008 

040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE .......................... 100,657 109,557 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [8,900 ] 

050 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............ 305 305 

060 AVIATION LOGISTICS .................................................. 3,927 3,927 

070 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ............. 75,933 75,933 

080 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ........... 601 601 

090 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................... 44,364 44,364 

100 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS .................................... 15,477 15,477 

110 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ...................................... 115,608 115,608 

120 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE ......................................... 1,967 1,967 

130 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ..................................... 43,726 43,726 

140 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION .............................................................. 69,011 74,011 

Sustainment to 90% ................................................. [5,000 ] 

150 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..................................... 109,604 109,604 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................. 1,174,808 1,190,608 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

160 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 2,905 2,905 

170 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................................................................... 14,425 14,425 
H. R. 3304—462 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

180 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 2,485 2,485 

190 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ..... 3,129 3,129 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 22,944 22,944 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

NAVY RES ....................................................... 1,197,752 1,213,552 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATING FORCES ................................................... 96,244 96,244 

020 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 17,581 17,581 

030 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION .............................................................. 32,438 32,738 

Sustainment to 90% ................................................. [300 ] 

040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..................................... 95,259 95,259 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................. 241,522 241,822 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

050 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ........................... 894 894 

060 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 11,743 11,743 

070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 9,158 9,158 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 21,795 21,795 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

MC RESERVE ................................................. 263,317 263,617 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ...................................... 3,295,814 3,442,614 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [146,800 ] 

020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES ......................... 1,875,095 1,875,095 

030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN 

SKILLS) ........................................................................ 1,559,109 1,579,109 

Increase for ranges ................................................... [20,000 ] 

040 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 5,956,304 6,146,304 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [190,000 ] 

050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 1,834,424 1,934,738 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [100,314 ] 

060 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 2,779,811 2,779,811 

070 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING ........................ 913,841 911,329 

Remove program growth for foreign currency fluctuation ................................................................... [–2,512 ] 

080 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS ................... 916,837 916,837 

100 TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES .............................................................................. 720,349 720,349 

110 LAUNCH FACILITIES ................................................... 305,275 305,275 

120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS ....................................... 433,658 433,658 

130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION 

SUPPORT ..................................................................... 1,146,016 1,146,016 

140 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS 231,830 231,830 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................. 21,968,363 22,422,965 

MOBILIZATION 

150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS ................................................. 2,015,902 2,015,902 

160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS .............................. 147,216 147,216 

170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 1,556,232 1,556,232 

180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 167,402 167,402 
H. R. 3304—463 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

190 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 707,040 707,040 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ............................. 4,593,792 4,593,792 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

200 OFFICER ACQUISITION .............................................. 102,334 102,334 

210 RECRUIT TRAINING .................................................... 17,733 17,733 

220 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) .... 94,600 94,600 

230 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 217,011 217,011 

240 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 800,327 800,327 

250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ................................ 399,364 399,364 

260 FLIGHT TRAINING ....................................................... 792,275 792,275 

270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..... 248,958 248,958 

280 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................... 106,741 106,741 

290 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 319,331 339,331 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [20,000 ] 

300 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 122,736 122,736 

310 EXAMINING ................................................................... 3,679 3,679 

320 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION ............ 137,255 137,255 

330 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING .................. 176,153 176,153 

340 JUNIOR ROTC ................................................................ 67,018 67,018 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .. 3,605,515 3,625,515 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS ............................................ 1,103,684 1,103,684 

360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ......................... 919,923 919,923 

370 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 56,601 56,601 

380 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 281,061 281,061 

390 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 1,203,305 1,198,128 

Unjustified increase for public-private competitions ....................................................................... [–5,177 ] 

400 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 593,865 593,865 

410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 574,609 574,609 

420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ......................... 1,028,600 1,028,600 

430 CIVIL AIR PATROL ....................................................... 24,720 24,720 

460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ....................................... 89,008 89,008 

465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................. 1,227,796 1,227,796 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 7,103,172 7,097,995 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

470 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –200,000 

Average civilian end strength above projection ..... [–200,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... –200,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

AIR FORCE ..................................................... 37,270,842 37,540,267 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ...................................... 1,857,951 1,857,951 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ............................ 224,462 220,062 

Unjustified growth in civilian personnel compensation ............................................................... [–4,400 ] 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 521,182 521,182 

040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 89,704 98,674 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [8,970 ] 

050 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 360,836 360,836 
H. R. 3304—464 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................. 3,054,135 3,058,705 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

060 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 64,362 64,362 

070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 15,056 15,056 

080 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC) 23,617 23,617 

090 OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP) ......... 6,618 6,618 

100 AUDIOVISUAL ............................................................... 819 819 

SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND 

SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES .......................... 110,472 110,472 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

AF RESERVE .................................................. 3,164,607 3,169,177 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS ............................................. 3,371,871 3,371,871 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ............................ 720,305 720,305 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 1,514,870 1,514,870 

040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 296,953 325,153 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [28,200 ] 

050 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 597,303 597,303 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................. 6,501,302 6,529,502 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 

060 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 32,117 32,117 

070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 32,585 32,585 

SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES ................................... 64,702 64,702 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ANG ................................................................... 6,566,004 6,594,204 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSEWIDE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF ........................................... 472,239 472,239 

020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND .......................... 5,261,463 5,233,611 

AFSOC Flying Hour Program ................................. [70,100 ] 

International SOF Information Sharing System ... [–7,017 ] 

Ongoing baseline contingency operations .............. [–35,519 ] 

Other Operations—military construction collateral equipment non-recurring costs .................... [–5,000 ] 

Pilot program for SOF family members ................. [5,000 ] 

Preserve the force and families—human performance program ........................................................ [–11,605 ] 

Preserve the force and families—resiliency ........... [–8,786 ] 

Realignment of NATO Special Operations Headquarters to O&M, Army ....................................... [–31,200 ] 

Regional SOF Coordination Centers ...................... [–14,725 ] 

USASOC Flying Hour Program .............................. [18,000 ] 

USSOCOM NCR Contractor Support ..................... [–7,100 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .................. 5,733,702 5,705,850 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

040 DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY .................... 157,397 157,397 
H. R. 3304—465 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

050 NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY .......................... 84,899 84,899 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .. 242,296 242,296 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

060 CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS ..................................... 144,443 166,142 

STARBASE ............................................................... [21,699 ] 

080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY ................... 612,207 583,207 

Overestimation of Civilian Full Time Equivalent 

Targets .................................................................. [–29,000 ] 

090 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY ... 1,378,606 1,319,606 

Overestimation of Civilian Full Time Equivalent 

Targets .................................................................. [–59,000 ] 

110 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY ............ 763,091 763,091 

120 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY ....... 1,326,243 1,326,243 

140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY .................... 29,933 29,933 

150 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ................................. 462,545 451,517 

Cost of DISA computing service rates .................... [–11,028 ] 

160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY ....................................... 222,979 222,979 

170 DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE ...................................... 21,594 21,594 

180 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY ..... 788,389 761,589 

Combating terrorism fellowship program .............. [–7,000 ] 

Global Train and Equip ........................................... [–7,800 ] 

Regional centers for security centers—undistributed decrease ........................................................ [–12,000 ] 

190 DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE ................................. 546,603 546,603 

210 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ..................................................................... 35,151 35,151 

220 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY ............. 438,033 438,033 

240 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY ................................................................................ 2,713,756 2,713,756 

250 MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY ...................................... 256,201 254,801 

THAAD excess to requirement ............................... [–1,400 ] 

270 OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT ................... 371,615 217,715 

Program decrease ..................................................... [–273,300 ] 

Rephasing of Guam civilian water and waste 

water infrastructure projects ............................... [119,400 ] 

280 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE .......... 2,010,176 1,995,176 

BRAC 2015 Initiative .............................................. [–8,000 ] 

OUSD(P) program decrease .................................... [–7,000 ] 

290 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES .......... 616,572 611,572 

Price Growth Requested as Program Growth ........ [–5,000 ] 

295 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................. 14,283,558 14,323,558 

Classified adjustment .............................................. [10,000 ] 

Increase to Operation Observant Compass ............ [30,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND 

SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES .......................... 27,021,695 26,782,266 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

305 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... 30,000 

Impact Aid ................................................................ [25,000 ] 

Impact Aid for Children with Severe Disabilities [5,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... 30,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

DEFENSE-WIDE ............................................ 32,997,693 32,760,412 

MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 

040 US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED 

FORCES, DEFENSE ................................................... 13,606 13,606 
H. R. 3304—466 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

050 OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND 

CIVIC AID .................................................................... 109,500 109,500 

060 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ..................... 528,455 528,455 

080 ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD ......................................... 256,031 131,331 

Program decrease ..................................................... [–124,700 ] 

090 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY .............. 298,815 298,815 

100 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY .............. 316,103 316,103 

110 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE .... 439,820 439,820 

120 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE ....... 10,757 10,757 

130 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY 

USED SITES ................................................................ 237,443 237,443 

160 OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND ................................................................... 5,000 0 

Program reduction ................................................... [–5,000 ] 

TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS ............................................................... 2,215,530 2,085,830 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE .... 175,097,941 176,420,426 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ............................................................ 217,571 217,571 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES .................................... 8,266 8,266 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ......................................... 56,626 56,626 

040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ................................................ 4,209,942 4,209,942 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ....................... 950,567 950,567 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ............................................................. 474,288 474,288 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............. 1,349,152 1,349,152 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS .......................... 655,000 655,000 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ........................ 301,563 301,563 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........................................ 706,214 706,214 

140 ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES ................................................ 11,519,498 11,519,498 

150 COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM 60,000 60,000 

160 RESET ................................................................................... 2,240,358 3,340,358 

Restore Critical Army Reset ......................................... [1,100,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ....................... 22,749,045 23,849,045 

ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 

350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ................................ 4,601,356 4,601,356 

380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT ....................................... 17,418 17,418 

400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS .............................. 110,000 110,000 

420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ...................................... 94,820 94,820 

430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT ............................................. 54,000 54,000 

450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT ....................................... 250,000 250,000 

525 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................. 1,402,994 1,402,994 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES .. 6,530,588 6,530,588 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ARMY ..................................................................... 29,279,633 30,379,633 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES 
H. R. 3304—467 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

OPERATING FORCES 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ......................................... 6,995 6,995 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ....................... 2,332 2,332 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............. 608 608 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........................................ 33,000 33,000 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ....................... 42,935 42,935 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ARMY RES ............................................................ 42,935 42,935 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ............................................................ 29,314 29,314 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES .................................... 1,494 1,494 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ......................................... 15,343 15,343 

040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ................................................ 1,549 1,549 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ............................................................. 64,504 64,504 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............. 31,512 31,512 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........................................ 42,179 42,179 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ’S ................... 11,996 11,996 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ....................... 197,891 197,891 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS .............................. 1,480 1,480 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ....... 1,480 1,480 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ARNG ..................................................................... 199,371 199,371 

AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND 

MINISTRY OF DEFENSE 

010 SUSTAINMENT ................................................................... 2,735,603 2,735,603 

020 INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................ 278,650 278,650 

030 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION .......................... 2,180,382 2,180,382 

040 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ........................................ 626,550 626,550 

SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF DEFENSE .................. 5,821,185 5,821,185 

MINISTRY OF INTERIOR 

060 SUSTAINMENT ................................................................... 1,214,995 1,214,995 

080 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION .......................... 54,696 54,696 

090 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ........................................ 626,119 626,119 

SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF INTERIOR ................ 1,895,810 1,895,810 

DETAINEE OPS 

110 SUSTAINMENT ................................................................... 7,225 7,225 

140 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ........................................ 2,500 2,500 

SUBTOTAL DETAINEE OPS ................................... 9,725 9,725 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

160 UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................... –1,500,000 

Program decrease .......................................................... [–1,500,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ............................... –1,500,000 

TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES 

FUND ..................................................................... 7,726,720 6,226,720 

AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 

AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 

010 POWER ................................................................................. 279,000 250,000 
H. R. 3304—468 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Unjustified expenditure ................................................ [–29,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND ............................................................ 279,000 250,000 

TOTAL AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE 

FUND ..................................................................... 279,000 250,000 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ............. 845,169 845,169 

030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING 

SERVICES ......................................................................... 600 600 

040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT .................. 17,489 17,489 

050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT ................................................... 78,491 78,491 

060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................... 162,420 162,420 

070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................. 2,700 2,700 

080 AVIATION LOGISTICS ....................................................... 50,130 50,130 

090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS .................. 949,539 949,539 

100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ................ 20,226 20,226 

110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .......................................... 1,679,660 1,679,660 

130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS ......................................... 37,760 37,760 

160 WARFARE TACTICS ........................................................... 25,351 25,351 

170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY .............................................................................. 20,045 20,045 

180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ........................................... 1,212,296 1,212,296 

190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ......................................... 10,203 10,203 

250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT ............... 127,972 127,972 

260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE .............................................. 221,427 221,427 

290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION .................................................................................. 13,386 13,386 

300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .......................................... 110,940 110,940 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ....................... 5,585,804 5,585,804 

MOBILIZATION 

340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS ....... 18,460 18,460 

360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT ................................................. 227,033 227,033 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ................................... 245,493 245,493 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ..................................... 50,269 50,269 

430 TRAINING SUPPORT ......................................................... 5,400 5,400 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ....... 55,669 55,669 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

480 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................. 2,418 2,418 

490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS ................................................... 516 516 

510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................................................................................ 5,107 5,107 

520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ...................................... 1,411 1,411 

530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS .............................. 2,545 2,545 

550 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ................................ 153,427 153,427 

580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT .......... 8,570 8,570 

620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE ................................. 1,425 1,425 

705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................. 5,608 5,608 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ....... 181,027 181,027 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

NAVY ...................................................................... 6,067,993 6,067,993 
H. R. 3304—469 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATIONAL FORCES ................................................... 992,190 992,190 

020 FIELD LOGISTICS .............................................................. 559,574 559,574 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................................... 570,000 570,000 

060 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .......................................... 69,726 69,726 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ....................... 2,191,490 2,191,490 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

110 TRAINING SUPPORT ......................................................... 108,270 108,270 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ....... 108,270 108,270 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

150 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ................................ 365,555 365,555 

160 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................. 3,675 3,675 

185 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................. 825 825 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ....... 370,055 370,055 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS ....................................................... 2,669,815 2,669,815 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ............. 17,196 17,196 

020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE ................................... 200 200 

040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................... 6,000 6,000 

070 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS .................. 12,304 12,304 

090 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .......................................... 6,790 6,790 

110 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ........................................... 13,210 13,210 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ....................... 55,700 55,700 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

NAVY RES ............................................................ 55,700 55,700 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATING FORCES ........................................................ 11,124 11,124 

040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .......................................... 1,410 1,410 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ....................... 12,534 12,534 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC 

RESERVE .............................................................. 12,534 12,534 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ............................................ 1,712,393 1,712,393 

020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES ............................... 836,104 836,104 

030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN 

SKILLS) ............................................................................. 14,118 14,118 

040 DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................................... 1,373,480 1,373,480 

050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .................................................................... 122,712 122,712 

060 BASE SUPPORT .................................................................. 1,520,333 1,520,333 

070 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING ............................. 31,582 31,582 

080 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS ......................... 147,524 147,524 

110 LAUNCH FACILITIES ........................................................ 857 857 

120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS ............................................ 8,353 8,353 

130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT ................................................................................. 50,495 50,495 
H. R. 3304—470 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ....................... 5,817,951 5,817,951 

MOBILIZATION 

150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS ...................................................... 3,091,133 3,091,133 

160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS ................................... 47,897 47,897 

170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................................... 387,179 517,179 

Program increase .......................................................... [130,000 ] 

180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .................................................................... 7,043 7,043 

190 BASE SUPPORT .................................................................. 68,382 68,382 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ................................... 3,601,634 3,731,634 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

200 OFFICER ACQUISITION ................................................... 100 100 

210 RECRUIT TRAINING .......................................................... 478 478 

240 BASE SUPPORT .................................................................. 19,256 19,256 

250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ..................................... 12,845 12,845 

260 FLIGHT TRAINING ............................................................ 731 731 

270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ........... 607 607 

280 TRAINING SUPPORT ......................................................... 720 720 

320 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION ................. 152 152 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ....... 34,889 34,889 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS ................................................. 86,273 86,273 

360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ............................... 2,511 2,511 

390 BASE SUPPORT .................................................................. 19,887 19,887 

400 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................. 3,493 3,493 

410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS .............................. 152,086 152,086 

420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES .............................. 269,825 269,825 

460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ............................................ 117 117 

465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................. 16,558 16,558 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ....... 550,750 550,750 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR 

FORCE ................................................................... 10,005,224 10,135,224 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE 

OPERATING FORCES 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................................... 26,599 26,599 

050 BASE SUPPORT .................................................................. 6,250 6,250 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ....................... 32,849 32,849 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF 

RESERVE .............................................................. 32,849 32,849 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG 

OPERATING FORCES 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS .................................. 22,200 22,200 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ....................... 22,200 22,200 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG 22,200 22,200 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE 

OPERATING FORCES 

020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ............................... 2,222,868 2,222,868 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ....................... 2,222,868 2,222,868 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 
H. R. 3304—471 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY ........................ 27,781 27,781 

090 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY ........ 45,746 45,746 

120 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY ............ 76,348 76,348 

140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY .......................... 99,538 99,538 

160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY ............................................ 9,620 9,620 

180 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY .......... 1,950,000 1,950,000 

240 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY 100,100 100,100 

280 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ................ 38,227 38,227 

290 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES ............... 2,784 2,784 

295 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................. 1,862,066 1,862,066 

SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND 

SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ............................... 4,212,210 4,212,210 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE ....................................................... 6,435,078 6,435,078 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ......... 62,829,052 62,530,052 

TITLE XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL 

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Military Personnel Appropriations ............................................... 130,399,881 129,716,981 

Enlistment bonuses excess to requirement ......................... [–38,000 ] 

Excess to requirement .......................................................... [–64,300 ] 

Full Time Pay and Allowances projected underexecution [–10,000 ] 

Full Time Support projected underexecution ..................... [–1,000 ] 

Military Personnel unobligated ............................................ [–186,000 ] 

Permanent Change of Station Travel—Army ..................... [–150,000 ] 

Recruiting and Retention programs excess to requirement [–1,800 ] 

Reenlistment bonuses excess to requirement ..................... [–68,300 ] 

Reserve Incentive Programs excess to requirement ........... [–7,750 ] 

Travel, Active Duty for Training, projected underexecution ....................................................................................... [–18,000 ] 

Undistributed reduction consistent with pace of drawdown ..................................................................................... [–137,750 ] 

Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions .............. 6,676,750 6,676,750 

Total, Military Personnel .................................................. 137,076,631 136,393,731 

SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY 

OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Military Personnel Appropriations ............................................... 9,689,307 9,648,807 

Projected underexecution ...................................................... [–40,500 ] 

Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions .............. 164,033 164,033 

Total, Military Personnel .................................................. 9,853,340 9,812,840 
H. R. 3304—472 

TITLE XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS. 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY 

PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS ............................ 25,158 25,158 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY ................ 25,158 25,158 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE 

FUEL COSTS 

SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS (MEDICAL/DENTAL) .............. 61,731 61,731 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE ..... 61,731 61,731 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE 

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) .................................... 46,428 46,428 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSEWIDE ................................................................................... 46,428 46,428 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA ........................................... 1,412,510 1,412,510 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA ................ 1,412,510 1,412,510 

NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND 

LMSR 

MPF MLP ....................................................................................... 134,917 22,717 

Navy requested adjustment .......................................... [–112,200 ] 

POST DELIVERY AND OUTFITTING ....................................... 43,404 43,404 

NATIONAL DEF SEALIFT VESSEL 

LG MED SPD RO/RO MAINTENANCE ..................................... 116,784 116,784 

DOD MOBILIZATION ALTERATIONS ...................................... 60,703 60,703 

TAH MAINTENANCE .................................................................. 19,809 19,809 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ........................................... 56,058 56,058 

READY RESERVE FORCE .......................................................... 299,025 299,025 

TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND ........ 730,700 618,500 

CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ............................................... 451,572 451,572 

RDT&E ........................................................................................... 604,183 604,183 

PROCUREMENT .......................................................................... 1,368 1,368 

TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION ................................................................................... 1,057,123 1,057,123 

DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF 

OPERATING FORCES ................................................................. 815,965 815,965 

DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM .............................. 122,580 122,580 

TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF ................................................................. 938,545 938,545 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE .......................................... 311,131 346,000 

Program increase ........................................................... [34,869 ] 

RDT&E 

PROCUREMENT .......................................................................... 1,000 1,000 

TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL .... 312,131 347,000 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 

IN-HOUSE CARE .......................................................................... 8,880,738 8,880,738 

PRIVATE SECTOR CARE ............................................................ 15,842,732 15,775,732 

Pharmaceutical drugs excess growth ........................... [–67,000 ] 
H. R. 3304—473 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT ...................................... 2,505,640 2,505,640 

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ............................................... 1,450,619 1,450,619 

MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ..................................................... 368,248 368,248 

EDUCATION AND TRAINING ................................................... 733,097 733,097 

BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS ............................... 1,872,660 1,872,660 

R&D RESEARCH .......................................................................... 9,162 9,162 

R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT ....................................... 47,977 47,977 

R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ........................................... 291,156 291,156 

R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION .................................... 132,430 132,430 

R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT .................................... 161,674 161,674 

R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT ...................................... 72,568 72,568 

R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT .................................... 14,646 14,646 

RDT&E UNDISTRIBUTED 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 

PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING ..................................................... 89,404 89,404 

PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION ......................... 377,577 377,577 

PROC IEHR ................................................................................... 204,200 204,200 

UNDISTRIBUTED ........................................................................ –57,000 

DHP Unobligated ........................................................... [–275,000 ] 

Restore Tricare savings ................................................. [218,000 ] 

TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM ...................... 33,054,528 32,930,528 

TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ............................. 37,638,854 37,437,523 

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY 

OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY 

PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS .................................... 44,732 44,732 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY ........................ 44,732 44,732 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE 

C–17 CLS ENGINE REPAIR ............................................................... 78,500 78,500 

TRANSPORTATION FALLEN HEROES ............................................ 10,000 10,000 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE ............. 88,500 88,500 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE 

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) ............................................ 131,678 131,678 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE .... 131,678 131,678 

DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF 

OPERATING FORCES ......................................................................... 376,305 376,305 

TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF .................................................................................. 376,305 376,305 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE .................................................. 10,766 10,766 

TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL ............ 10,766 10,766 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 

IN-HOUSE CARE .................................................................................. 375,958 375,958 

PRIVATE SECTOR CARE .................................................................... 382,560 382,560 

CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT .............................................. 132,749 132,749 

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ....................................................... 2,238 2,238 

MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ............................................................. 460 460 
H. R. 3304—474 

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

EDUCATION AND TRAINING ........................................................... 10,236 10,236 

TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM .............................. 904,201 904,201 

TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ..................................... 1,556,182 1,556,182 

TITLE XLVI—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION. 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Alaska 

Army Fort Wainwright Aviation Battalion Complex ..................... 45,000 45,000 

Army Fort Wainwright Aviation Storage Hangar .......................... 58,000 58,000 

Colorado 

Army Fort Carson Aircraft Maintenance Hangar .................. 66,000 66,000 

Army Fort Carson Aircraft Maintenance Hangar .................. 73,000 73,000 

Army Fort Carson Central Energy Plant ............................... 34,000 34,000 

Army Fort Carson Fire Station ............................................... 12,000 12,000 

Army Fort Carson Headquarters Building ............................. 33,000 33,000 

Army Fort Carson Runway ...................................................... 12,000 12,000 

Army Fort Carson Simulator Building ................................... 12,200 12,200 

Florida 

Army Eglin AFB Automated Sniper Field Fire Range ....... 4,700 4,700 

Georgia 

Army Fort Gordon Adv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, 

Ph2.

61,000 61,000 

Hawaii 

Army Fort Shafter Command and Control Facility—Admin 75,000 70,000 

Kansas 

Army Fort Leavenworth Simulations Center ................................... 17,000 17,000 

Kentucky 

Army Fort Campbell Battlefield Weather Support Facility ...... 4,800 4,800 

Maryland 

Army Aberdeen Proving 

Ground 

Operations and Maintenance Facilities .. 21,000 21,000 

Army Fort Detrick Entry Control Point .................................. 2,500 2,500 

Army Fort Detrick Hazardous Material Storage Building .... 4,600 4,600 

Missouri 

Army Fort Leonard 

Wood 

Adv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, 

Ph1.

86,000 86,000 

Army Fort Leonard 

Wood 

Simulator Building ................................... 4,700 4,700 

New York 

Army U.S. Military 

Academy 

Cadet Barracks, Incr 2 ............................. 42,000 42,000 

North Carolina 

Army Fort Bragg Command and Control Facility ............... 5,900 5,900 

Texas 

Army Fort Bliss Control Tower ............................................ 10,800 10,800 

Army Fort Bliss Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Complex ........ 36,000 36,000 

Virginia 

Army Joint Base Langley-Eustis Adv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, 

Ph3.

50,000 50,000 

Washington 

Army Joint Base LewisMcchord Aircraft Maintenance Hangar .................. 79,000 79,000 

Army Joint Base LewisMcchord Airfield Operations Complex .................... 37,000 37,000 

Army Joint Base LewisMcchord Aviation Battalion Complex ..................... 28,000 28,000 
H. R. 3304—475 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Army Yakima Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun 

Range.

9,100 9,100 

Worldwide Classified 

Army Classified Location Company Operations Complex ................ 33,000 0 

Japan 

Army Kyoga Misaki Company Operations Complex ................ 0 33,000 

Kwajalein 

Army Kwajalein Atoll Pier ............................................................. 63,000 63,000 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Host Nation Support Fy14 ....................... 33,000 28,000 

Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Minor Construction Fy14 ......................... 25,000 25,000 

Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design Fy14 ....................... 41,575 41,575 

Total Military Construction, Army .............................................................. 1,119,875 1,109,875 

California 

Navy Barstow Engine Dynamometer Facility ................. 14,998 14,998 

Navy Camp Pendleton Ammunition Supply Point Upgrade ........ 13,124 13,124 

Navy Coronado H–60 Trainer Facility ............................... 8,910 8,910 

Navy Point Mugu Aircraft Engine Test Pads ........................ 7,198 7,198 

Navy Point Mugu Bams Consolidated Maintenance Hangar 17,469 17,469 

Navy Port Hueneme Unaccompanied Housing Conversion ...... 33,600 33,600 

Navy San Diego Steam Plant Decentralization .................. 34,331 34,331 

Navy Twentynine 

Palms 

Camp Wilson Infrastructure Upgrades ... 33,437 33,437 

Florida 

Navy Jacksonville P–8a Training & Parking Apron Expansion.20,752 20,752 

Navy Key West Aircraft Crash/Rescue & Fire Headquarters.14,001 14,001 

Navy Mayport Lcs Logistics Support Facility .................. 16,093 16,093 

Georgia 

Navy Albany Cers Dispatch Facility .............................. 1,010 1,010 

Navy Albany Weapons Storage and Inspection Facility 15,600 15,600 

Navy Savannah Townsend Bombing Range Land Acq— 

Phase 1.

61,717 61,717 

Guam 

Navy Joint Region Marianas Aircraft Maintenance Hangar—North 

Ramp.

85,673 85,673 

Navy Joint Region Marianas Bams Forward Operational & Maintenance Hangar.61,702 61,702 

Navy Joint Region Marianas Dehumidified Supply Storage Facility .... 17,170 17,170 

Navy Joint Region Marianas Emergent Repair Facility Expansion ...... 35,860 35,860 

Navy Joint Region Marianas Modular Storage Magazines .................... 63,382 63,382 

Navy Joint Region Marianas Sierra Wharf Improvements .................... 1,170 1,170 

Navy Joint Region Marianas X-Ray Wharf Improvements .................... 53,420 53,420 

Hawaii 

Navy Kaneohe Bay 3rd Radio Bn Maintenance/Operations 

Complex.

25,336 25,336 

Navy Kaneohe Bay Aircraft Maintenance Expansion ............. 16,968 16,968 

Navy Kaneohe Bay Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Upgrades 31,820 31,820 

Navy Kaneohe Bay Armory Addition and Renovation ............ 12,952 12,952 
H. R. 3304—476 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Navy Kaneohe Bay Aviation Simulator Modernization/Addition.17,724 17,724 

Navy Kaneohe Bay Mv–22 Hangar .......................................... 57,517 57,517 

Navy Kaneohe Bay Mv–22 Parking Apron and Infrastructure.74,665 74,665 

Navy Pearl City Water Transmission Line ......................... 30,100 30,100 

Navy Pearl Harbor Drydock Waterfront Facility .................... 22,721 22,721 

Navy Pearl Harbor Submarine Production Support Facility 35,277 35,277 

Illinois 

Navy Great Lakes Unaccompanied Housing .......................... 35,851 35,851 

Maine 

Navy Bangor Nctams Vlf Commercial Power Connection.13,800 13,800 

Navy Kittery Structural Shops Consolidation ............... 11,522 11,522 

Maryland 

Navy Fort Meade Marforcybercom HQ-Ops Building .......... 83,988 83,988 

Nevada 

Navy Fallon Wastewater Treatment Plant .................. 11,334 11,334 

North Carolina 

Navy Camp Lejeune Landfill—Phase 4 ...................................... 20,795 20,795 

Navy Camp Lejeune Operations Training Complex .................. 22,515 22,515 

Navy Camp Lejeune Steam Decentralization—BEQ Nodes ..... 18,679 18,679 

Navy Camp Lejeune Steam Decentralization—Camp Johnson 2,620 2,620 

Navy Camp Lejeune Steam Decentralization—Hadnot Point .. 13,390 13,390 

Navy New River Ch–53k Maintenance Training Facility .. 13,218 13,218 

Navy New River Corrosion Control Hangar ........................ 12,547 12,547 

Navy New River Regional Communication Station ............ 20,098 20,098 

Oklahoma 

Navy Tinker AFB Tacamo E–6B Hangar .............................. 14,144 14,144 

Rhode Island 

Navy Newport Hewitt Hall Research Center ................... 12,422 12,422 

South Carolina 

Navy Charleston Nuclear Power Operational Training Facility.73,932 73,932 

Virginia 

Navy Dam Neck Aerial Target Operation Consolidation ... 10,587 10,587 

Navy Norfolk Pier 11 Power Upgrades for Cvn–78 ....... 3,380 3,380 

Navy Quantico Academic Instruction Facility Tecom 

Schools.

25,731 25,731 

Navy Quantico Atc Transmitter/Receiver Relocation ....... 3,630 3,630 

Navy Quantico Fuller Road Improvements ...................... 9,013 9,013 

Navy Yorktown Small Arms Ranges .................................. 18,700 18,700 

Washington 

Navy Bremerton Integrated Water Treatment Sys Dry 

Docks 3&4.

18,189 18,189 

Navy Kitsap Explosives Handling Wharf #2 (Inc) ....... 24,880 24,880 

Navy Whidbey Island Ea–18g Facility Improvements ................ 32,482 32,482 

Navy Whidbey Island P–8a Hangar and Training Facilities ..... 85,167 85,167 

Djibouti 

Navy Camp Lemonier Armory ....................................................... 6,420 6,420 

Navy Camp Lemonier Unaccompanied Housing .......................... 22,580 22,580 

Japan 

Navy Camp Butler Airfield Security Upgrades ....................... 5,820 5,820 

Navy Yokosuka Communication System Upgrade ............ 7,568 7,568 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Mcon Design Funds .................................. 89,830 89,830 

Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 19,740 19,740 

Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Worldwide Construction ...... 0 0 

Total Military Construction, Navy .............................................................. 1,700,269 1,700,269 
H. R. 3304—477 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Arizona 

AF Luke AFB F–35 Field Training Detachment ............ 5,500 5,500 

AF Luke AFB F–35 Sq Ops/Aircraft Maintenance Unit 

#3.

21,400 21,400 

California 

AF Beale AFB Distributed Common Ground Station 

Ops Bldg.

62,000 62,000 

Florida 

AF Tyndall AFB F–22 Munitions Storage Complex ........... 9,100 9,100 

Guam 

AF Joint Region Marianas Par—Fuel Sys Hardened Bldgs ............... 20,000 20,000 

AF Joint Region Marianas Par—Strike Tactical Missile Mxs Facility.10,530 10,530 

AF Joint Region Marianas Par—Tanker Gp Mx Hangar/AMU/Sqd 

Ops.

132,600 132,600 

AF Joint Region Marianas Prtc Red Horse Airfield Operations Facility.8,500 8,500 

AF Joint Region Marianas Prtc Sf Fire Rescue & Emergency Mgt ... 4,600 4,600 

Hawaii 

AF Joint Base Pearl 

Harbor-Hickam 

C–17 Modernize Hgr 35, Docks 1&2 ....... 4,800 4,800 

Kansas 

AF Mcconnell AFB KC–46a 2–Bay Corrosion Control/Fuel 

Cell Hangar.

0 82,000 

AF Mcconnell AFB KC–46a 3–Bay General Purpose Maintenance Hangar.0 80,000 

AF Mcconnell AFB KC–46a Aircraft Parking Apron Alteration.0 2,200 

AF Mcconnell AFB KC–46a Aprons Fuels Distribution System.0 12,800 

AF Mcconnell AFB KC–46a Flight Simulator Facility Phase 

1.

0 2,150 

AF Mcconnell AFB KC–46a General Maintenance Hangar ... 0 32,000 

AF Mcconnell AFB KC–46a Miscellaneous Facilities Alteration.0 970 

AF Mcconnell AFB KC–46a Pipeline Student Dormatory ...... 0 7,000 

Kentucky 

AF Fort Campbell 19th Air Support Operations Sqdrn Expansion.8,000 8,000 

Maryland 

AF Fort Meade Cybercom Joint Operations Center, Increment 1.85,000 85,000 

AF Joint Base Andrews Helicopter Operations Facility ................. 30,000 30,000 

Missouri 

AF Whiteman AFB Wsa Mop Igloos and Assembly Facility .. 5,900 5,900 

Nebraska 

AF Offutt AFB Usstratcom Replacement Facility, Incr 3 136,000 136,000 

Nevada 

AF Nellis AFB Add Rpa Weapons School Facility ........... 20,000 20,000 

AF Nellis AFB Dormitory (240 Rm) .................................. 35,000 35,000 

AF Nellis AFB F–35 Alt Mission Equip (Ame) Storage .. 5,000 5,000 

AF Nellis AFB F–35 Fuel Cell Hangar ............................. 9,400 9,400 

AF Nellis AFB F–35 Parts Store ....................................... 9,100 9,100 

New Mexico 

AF Cannon AFB Airmen and Family Readiness Center .... 5,500 5,500 

AF Cannon AFB Dormitory (144 Rm) .................................. 22,000 22,000 

AF Cannon AFB Satellite Dining Facility ........................... 6,600 6,600 

AF Holloman AFB F–16 Aircraft Covered Washrack and 

Pad.

2,250 2,250 

AF Kirtland AFB Nuclear Systems Wing & Sustainment 

Center (Ph.

30,500 30,500 

North Dakota 

AF Minot AFB B–52 Adal Aircraft Maintenance Unit .... 15,530 15,530 
H. R. 3304—478 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

AF Minot AFB B–52 Munitions Storage Igloos ................ 8,300 8,300 

Oklahoma 

AF Altus AFB KC–46a Ftu Adal Fuel Systems Maintenance Dock.0 3,350 

AF Altus AFB KC–46a Ftu Adal Squad Ops/AMU ......... 0 7,400 

AF Altus AFB KC–46a Ftu Flight Training Center Simulators Facility Phase 1.0 12,600 

AF Altus AFB KC–46a Ftu Fuselage Trainer Phase 1 ... 0 6,300 

AF Altus AFB KC–46a Ftu Renovate Facility ................ 0 1,200 

AF Tinker AFB KC–46a Land Acquisition ........................ 8,600 8,600 

Texas 

AF Fort Bliss F–16 Bak 12/14 Aircraft Arresting System.3,350 3,350 

Utah 

AF Hill AFB F–35 Aircraft Mx Unit Hangar 45e Ops 

#1.

13,500 13,500 

AF Hill AFB Fire Crash Rescue Station ....................... 18,500 18,500 

Virginia 

AF Joint Base Langley-Eustis 4–Bay Conventional Munitions Inspection Bldg.4,800 4,800 

Greenland 

AF Thule Ab Thule Consolidation, Phase 2 .................. 43,904 43,904 

Mariana Islands 

AF Saipan Par—Airport Pol/Bulk Storage Ast ......... 18,500 18,500 

AF Saipan Par—Hazardous Cargo Pad ..................... 8,000 8,000 

AF Saipan Par—Maintenance Facility ...................... 2,800 2,800 

United Kingdom 

AF Croughton Raf Main Gate Complex .................................. 12,000 0 

AF Varlocs Guardian Angel Operations Facility ....... 22,047 22,047 

Worldwide Unspecified 

AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

KC–46a Ftu Facility Projects ................... 63,000 0 

AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

KC–46a Mob #1 Facility Projects ............ 192,700 0 

AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning & Design .................................... 11,314 11,314 

AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 20,448 20,448 

Total Military Construction, Air Force ...................................................... 1,156,573 1,138,843 

Alaska 

Def-Wide Clear AFS Bmds Upgrade Early Warning Radar ..... 17,204 17,204 

Def-Wide Fort Greely Mechanical-Electrical Bldg Missile Field 

#1.

82,000 82,000 

California 

Def-Wide Brawley SOF Desert Warfare Training Center ..... 23,095 23,095 

Def-Wide Defense Distribution DepotTracy 

General Purpose Warehouse .................... 37,554 37,554 

Def-Wide Miramar Replace Fuel Pipeline ............................... 6,000 6,000 

Colorado 

Def-Wide Fort Carson SOF Group Support Battalion ................. 22,282 22,282 

Florida 

Def-Wide Hurlburt Field SOF Add/Alter Operations Facility ......... 7,900 7,900 

Def-Wide Jacksonville Replace Fuel Pipeline ............................... 7,500 7,500 

Def-Wide Key West SOF Boat Docks ........................................ 3,600 3,600 

Def-Wide Panama City Replace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility 2,600 2,600 

Def-Wide Tyndall AFB Replace Fuel Pipeline ............................... 9,500 9,500 

Georgia 

Def-Wide Fort Benning Faith Middle School Addition .................. 6,031 6,031 

Def-Wide Fort Benning White Elemtary School Replacement ...... 37,304 37,304 
H. R. 3304—479 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Def-Wide Fort Stewart Diamond Elementary School Replacement.44,504 44,504 

Def-Wide Hunter Army Airfield Replace Fuel Island .................................. 13,500 13,500 

Def-Wide Moody AFB Replace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility 3,800 3,800 

Hawaii 

Def-Wide Ford Island DISA Pacific Facility Upgrades ............... 2,615 2,615 

Def-Wide Joint Base Pearl 

Harbor-Hickam 

Alter Warehouse Space ............................ 2,800 2,800 

Kentucky 

Def-Wide Fort Campbell Fort Campbell High School Replacement 59,278 59,278 

Def-Wide Fort Campbell Marshall Elementary School Replacement.38,591 38,591 

Def-Wide Fort Campbell SOF Group Special Troops Battalion ...... 26,342 26,342 

Def-Wide Fort Knox Ambulatory Health Center ...................... 265,000 145,000 

Def-Wide Fort Knox Consolidate/Replace Van Voorhis-Mudge 

Es.

38,023 38,023 

Maryland 

Def-Wide Aberdeen Proving 

Ground 

Public Health Command Lab Replacement.210,000 75,000 

Def-Wide Bethesda Naval 

Hospital 

Mech & Electrical Improvements ............ 46,800 46,800 

Def-Wide Bethesda Naval 

Hospital 

Parking Garage ......................................... 20,000 20,000 

Def-Wide Fort Detrick USAMRIID Replacement Stage 1, Incr 8 13,000 13,000 

Def-Wide Fort Meade High Performance Computing Capacity 

Inc 3.

431,000 396,000 

Def-Wide Fort Meade NSAW Recapitalize Building #1/Site M 

Inc 2.

58,000 58,000 

Def-Wide Joint Base Andrews Ambulatory Care Center Inc 2 ................ 76,200 38,100 

Massachusetts 

Def-Wide Hanscom AFB Hanscom Primary School Replacement .. 36,213 36,213 

New Jersey 

Def-Wide Joint Base 

Mcguire-DixLakehurst 

Replace Fuel Distribution Components .. 10,000 10,000 

New Mexico 

Def-Wide Holloman AFB Medical Clinic Replacement ..................... 60,000 60,000 

Def-Wide Holloman AFB Replace Hydrant Fuel System ................. 21,400 21,400 

North Carolina 

Def-Wide Camp Lejeune SOF Performance Resiliency Center ....... 14,400 14,400 

Def-Wide Camp Lejeune SOF Sustainment Training Complex ...... 28,977 28,977 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg Consolidate/Replace Pope Holbrook Elementary.37,032 37,032 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Civil Affairs Battalion Annex .......... 37,689 37,689 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Combat Medic Skills Sustain. 

Course Bldg.

7,600 7,600 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Engineer Training Facility .............. 10,419 10,419 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Language and Cultural Center ....... 64,606 64,606 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Upgrade Training Facility ............... 14,719 14,719 

North Dakota 

Def-Wide Minot AFB Replace Fuel Pipeline ............................... 6,400 6,400 

Oklahoma 

Def-Wide Altus AFB Replace Refueler Parking ......................... 2,100 2,100 

Def-Wide Tinker AFB Replace Fuel Distribution Facilities ........ 36,000 36,000 

Pennsylvania 

Def-Wide Def Distribution 

Depot New 

Cumberland 

Upgrade Hazardous Material Warehouse 3,100 3,100 

Def-Wide Def Distribution 

Depot New 

Cumberland 

Upgrade Public Safety Facility ................ 5,900 5,900 

South Carolina 

Def-Wide Beaufort Bolden Elementary/Middle School Replacement.41,324 41,324 

Tennessee 
H. R. 3304—480 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Def-Wide Arnold Air Force 

Base 

Replace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility 2,200 2,200 

Texas 

Def-Wide Fort Bliss Hospital Replacement Incr 5 ................... 252,100 100,000 

Def-Wide Joint Base San 

Antonio 

Sammc Hyperbaric Facility Addition ...... 12,600 12,600 

Virginia 

Def-Wide Dam Neck SOF Human Performance Center ........... 11,147 11,147 

Def-Wide Def Distribution 

Depot Richmond 

Operations Center Phase 1 ...................... 87,000 87,000 

Def-Wide Joint Expeditionary Base 

Little Creek— 

Story 

SOF Logsu Two Operations Facility ....... 30,404 30,404 

Def-Wide Pentagon Boundary Channel Access Control Point 6,700 6,700 

Def-Wide Pentagon Army Navy Drive Tour Bus Drop Off ..... 1,850 0 

Def-Wide Pentagon Pfpa Support Operations Center ............. 14,800 14,800 

Def-Wide Pentagon Raven Rock Administrative Facility Upgrade.32,000 32,000 

Def-Wide Pentagon Raven Rock Exterior Cooling Tower ....... 4,100 4,100 

Def-Wide Quantico Quantico Middle/High School Replacement.40,586 40,586 

Washington 

Def-Wide Whidbey Island Replace Fuel Pier Breakwater ................. 10,000 10,000 

Worldwide Classified 

Def-Wide Classified Location an/Tpy–2 Radar Site ................................. 15,000 0 

Bahrain Island 

Def-Wide Sw Asia Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement ........ 45,400 45,400 

Belgium 

Def-Wide Brussels NATO Headquarters Facility ................... 38,513 38,513 

Def-Wide Brussels NATO Headquarters Fit-Out ................... 29,100 29,100 

Germany 

Def-Wide Kaiserlautern Ab Kaiserslautern Elementary School Replacement.49,907 49,907 

Def-Wide Ramstein Ab Ramstein High School Replacement ....... 98,762 98,762 

Def-Wide Rhine Ordnance 

Barracks 

Medical Center Replacement, Incr 3 ....... 151,545 76,545 

Def-Wide Weisbaden Hainerberg Elementary School Replacement.58,899 58,899 

Def-Wide Weisbaden Wiesbaden Middle School Replacement .. 50,756 50,756 

Japan 

Def-Wide Atsugi Replace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility 4,100 4,100 

Def-Wide Iwakuni Construct Hydrant Fuel System .............. 34,000 34,000 

Def-Wide Kadena Ab Kadena Middle School Addition/Renovation.38,792 38,792 

Def-Wide Kyoga Misaki an/Tpy–2 Radar Site ................................. 0 15,000 

Def-Wide Torri Commo Station SOF Facility Augmentation ..................... 71,451 71,451 

Def-Wide Yokosuka Upgrade Fuel Pumps ................................ 10,600 10,600 

Korea 

Def-Wide Camp Walker Daegu Middle/High School Replacement 52,164 52,164 

Romania 

Def-Wide Deveselu Aegis Ashore Missile Def Sys Cmplx, 

Increm. 2.

85,000 80,000 

United Kingdom 

Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall Replace Fuel Storage ................................ 17,732 17,732 

Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Airfield Pavements and Hangar/ 

AMU.

0 48,448 

Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Airfiled Pavements ........................... 24,077 0 

Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Hangar/AMU .................................... 24,371 0 

Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Mrsp and Parts Storage ................... 6,797 6,797 

Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Squadron Operations Facility ......... 11,652 11,652 

Def-Wide Royal Air Force 

Lakenheath 

Lakenheath High School Replacement ... 69,638 69,638 
H. R. 3304—481 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Contingency Construction ........................ 10,000 0 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Energy Conservation Investment Program.150,000 150,000 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Exercise Related Minor Construction ..... 9,730 9,730 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning & Design .................................... 10,891 10,891 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................ 50,192 50,192 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................ 75,905 75,905 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................ 57,053 57,053 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................ 36,866 36,866 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................ 6,931 6,931 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 3,000 3,000 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 7,430 7,430 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 5,409 5,409 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 5,170 5,170 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 9,578 9,578 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 2,000 2,000 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 1,500 1,500 

Total Military Construction, Defense-Wide .............................................. 3,985,300 3,413,250 

Kentucky 

Chem Demil Blue Grass Army 

Depot 

Ammunition Demilitarization Facility, 

Ph Xiv.

122,536 122,536 

Total Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense ...................... 122,536 122,536 

Worldwide Unspecified 

NATO NATO Security 

Investment Program 

NATO Security Investment Program ...... 239,700 199,700 

Total NATO Security Investment Program ............................................... 239,700 199,700 
H. R. 3304—482 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Alabama 

Army NG Decatur National Guard Readiness Center Add/ 

Alt.

4,000 4,000 

Arkansas 

Army NG Fort Chaffee Scout/Recce Gunnery Complex ................ 21,000 21,000 

Florida 

Army NG Pinellas Park Ready Building .......................................... 5,700 5,700 

Illinois 

Army NG Kankakee Aircraft Maintenance Hangar .................. 28,000 28,000 

Army NG Kankakee Readiness Center ...................................... 14,000 14,000 

Massachusetts 

Army NG Camp Edwards Enlisted Barracks, Transient Training 

Add.

19,000 19,000 

Michigan 

Army NG Camp Grayling Enlisted Barracks, Transient Training ... 17,000 17,000 

Minnesota 

Army NG Stillwater Readiness Center ...................................... 17,000 17,000 

Mississippi 

Army NG Camp Shelby Water Supply/Treatment Building, Potable.3,000 3,000 

Army NG Pascagoula Readiness Center ...................................... 4,500 4,500 

Missouri 

Army NG Macon Vehicle Maintenance Shop ....................... 9,100 9,100 

Army NG Whiteman AFB Aircraft Maintenance Hangar .................. 5,000 5,000 

New York 

Army NG New York Readiness Center Add/Alt ........................ 31,000 31,000 

Ohio 

Army NG Ravenna Army 

Ammunition 

Plant 

Sanitary Sewer .......................................... 5,200 5,200 

Pennsylvania 

Army NG Fort Indiantown 

Gap 

Aircraft Maintenance Instructional 

Building.

40,000 40,000 

Puerto Rico 

Army NG Camp Santiago Maneuver Area Training & Equipment 

Site Addit.

5,600 5,600 

South Carolina 

Army NG Greenville Readiness Center ...................................... 13,000 13,000 

Army NG Greenville Vehicle Maintenance Shop ....................... 13,000 13,000 

Texas 

Army NG Fort Worth Armed Forces Reserve Center Add ......... 14,270 14,270 

Wyoming 

Army NG Afton National Guard Readiness Center .......... 10,200 10,200 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Army NG Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................ 29,005 24,005 

Army NG Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 12,240 12,240 

Total Military Construction, Army National Guard ............................... 320,815 315,815 

California 

Army Res Camp Parks Army Reserve Center ............................... 17,500 17,500 

Army Res Fort Hunter 

Liggett 

Tass Training Center (Ttc) ....................... 16,500 16,500 

Maryland 

Army Res Bowie Army Reserve Center ............................... 25,500 25,500 

New Jersey 

Army Res Joint Base 

Mcguire-DixLakehurst 

Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun 

(Mpmg).

9,500 9,500 

Army Res Joint Base 

Mcguire-DixLakehurst 

Central Issue Facility ............................... 7,900 7,900 
H. R. 3304—483 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Army Res Joint Base 

Mcguire-DixLakehurst 

Consolidated Dining Facility ................... 13,400 13,400 

Army Res Joint Base 

Mcguire-DixLakehurst 

Modified Record Fire Range ..................... 5,400 5,400 

New York 

Army Res Bullville Army Reserve Center ............................... 14,500 14,500 

North Carolina 

Army Res Fort Bragg Army Reserve Center ............................... 24,500 24,500 

Wisconsin 

Army Res Fort Mccoy Access Control Point/Mail/Freight Center.17,500 17,500 

Army Res Fort Mccoy Nco Academy Dining Facility .................. 5,900 5,900 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Army Res Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................ 14,212 14,212 

Army Res Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 1,748 1,748 

Total Military Construction, Army Reserve ............................................. 174,060 174,060 

California 

N/MC Res March AFB NOSC Moreno Valley Reserve Training 

Center.

11,086 11,086 

Missouri 

N/MC Res Kansas City Reserve Training Center—Belton, Missouri.15,020 15,020 

Tennessee 

N/MC Res Memphis Reserve Boat Maintenance and Storage 

Facility.

4,330 4,330 

Worldwide Unspecified 

N/MC Res Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Mcnr Planning & Design .......................... 1,500 1,500 

N/MC Res Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Usmcr Planning and Design .................... 1,040 1,040 

Total Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps Reserve ........... 32,976 32,976 

Alabama 

Air NG Birmingham IAP Add to and Alter Distributed Ground 

Station F.

8,500 8,500 

Indiana 

Air NG Hulman Regional 

Airport 

Add/Alter Bldg 37 for Dist Common 

Ground Sta.

7,300 7,300 

Maryland 

Air NG Fort Meade 175th Network Warfare Squadron Facility.4,000 4,000 

Air NG Martin State Airport Cyber/ISR Facility .................................... 8,000 8,000 

Montana 

Air NG Great Falls IAP Intra-Theater Airlift Conversion ............. 22,000 22,000 

New York 

Air NG Fort Drum Mq–9 Flight Training Unit Hangar ........ 4,700 4,700 

Ohio 

Air NG Springfield Beckley-Map Alter Intelligence Operations Facility ..... 7,200 7,200 

Pennsylvania 

Air NG Fort Indiantown 

Gap 

Communications Operations and Training Facili.7,700 7,700 

Rhode Island 
H. R. 3304—484 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Air NG Quonset State 

Airport 

C–130J Flight Simulator Training Facility.6,000 6,000 

Tennessee 

Air NG Mcghee-Tyson 

Airport 

Tec Expansion- Dormitory & Classroom 

Facility.

18,000 18,000 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Air NG Various Worldwide Locations Planning and Design ................................ 13,400 13,400 

Air NG Various Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 13,000 13,000 

Total Military Construction, Air National Guard ................................... 119,800 119,800 

California 

AF Res March AFB Joint Regional Deployment Processing 

Center,.

19,900 19,900 

Florida 

AF Res Homestead AFS Entry Control Complex ............................ 9,800 9,800 

Oklahoma 

AF Res Tinker AFB Air Control Group Squadron Operations 12,200 12,200 

Worldwide Unspecified 

AF Res Various Worldwide Locations Planning and Design ................................ 2,229 2,229 

AF Res Various Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 1,530 1,530 

Total Military Construction, Air Force Reserve ...................................... 45,659 45,659 

Wisconsin 

FH Con Army Fort Mccoy Family Housing New Construction (56 

Units).

23,000 23,000 

Germany 

FH Con Army South Camp 

Vilseck 

Family Housing New Construction (29 

Units).

16,600 16,600 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Con Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Family Housing P & D ............................. 4,408 4,408 

Total Family Housing Construction, Army ............................................... 44,008 44,008 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings ............................................... 33,125 33,125 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Leased Housing ......................................... 180,924 180,924 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance of Real Property Facilities 107,639 107,639 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Management Account ............................... 54,433 54,433 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Military Housing Privitization Initiative 25,661 25,661 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Miscellaneous ............................................ 646 646 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Services ...................................................... 13,536 13,536 
H. R. 3304—485 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Utilities ...................................................... 96,907 96,907 

Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Army ....................... 512,871 512,871 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Con AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Improvements ............................................ 72,093 72,093 

FH Con AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................ 4,267 4,267 

Total Family Housing Construction, Air Force ....................................... 76,360 76,360 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings Account ................................. 39,470 39,470 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Housing Privatization ............................... 41,436 41,436 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Leasing ....................................................... 54,514 54,514 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance (Rpma Rpmc) ...................... 110,786 110,786 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Management Account ............................... 53,044 53,044 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Miscellaneous Account .............................. 1,954 1,954 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Services Account ....................................... 16,862 16,862 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Utilities Account ....................................... 70,532 70,532 

Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Air Force ............... 388,598 388,598 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Con Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Design ........................................................ 4,438 4,438 

FH Con Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Improvements ............................................ 68,969 68,969 

Total Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps ............. 73,407 73,407 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings Account ................................. 21,073 21,073 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Leasing ....................................................... 74,962 74,962 
H. R. 3304—486 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance of Real Property ................. 90,122 90,122 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Management Account ............................... 60,782 60,782 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Miscellaneous Account .............................. 362 362 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Privatization Support Costs ..................... 27,634 27,634 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Services Account ....................................... 20,596 20,596 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Utilities Account ....................................... 94,313 94,313 

Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Navy and Marine 

Corps.

389,844 389,844 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings Account ................................. 67 67 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings Account ................................. 3,196 3,196 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings Account ................................. 20 20 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Leasing ....................................................... 10,994 10,994 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Leasing ....................................................... 40,433 40,433 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance of Real Property ................. 311 311 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance of Real Property ................. 74 74 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Management Account ............................... 418 418 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Services Account ....................................... 32 32 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Utilities Account ....................................... 12 12 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Utilities Account ....................................... 288 288 

Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide ........ 55,845 55,845 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FHIF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Family Housing Improvement Fund ....... 1,780 1,780 

Total DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund ..................................... 1,780 1,780 
H. R. 3304—487 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Worldwide Unspecified 

BRAC Base Realignment 

& Closure, 

Army 

Base Realignment and Closure ................ 180,401 180,401 

BRAC Base Realignment 

& Closure, 

Navy 

Base Realignment & Closure ................... 108,300 108,300 

BRAC Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Dod BRAC Activities—Air Force ............. 126,376 126,376 

BRAC Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Don–100: Planing, Design and Management.7,277 7,277 

BRAC Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Don–101: Various Locations .................... 20,988 20,988 

BRAC Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Don–138: NAS Brunswick, ME ................ 993 993 

BRAC Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Don–157: Mcsa Kansas City, MO ............ 40 40 

BRAC Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Don–172: NWS Seal Beach, Concord, CA 5,766 5,766 

BRAC Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Don–84: JRB Willow Grove & Cambria 

Reg Ap.

1,216 1,216 

Total Base Realignment and Closure Account ......................................... 451,357 451,357 

Worldwide Unspecified 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings—ANG Unspecified 

Minor Construction.

0 0 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings—Army Bid Savings 0 0 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings—Army Planning and 

Design Fy12.

0 0 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings—Defense Wide Bid 

Savings.

0 0 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings—Defense Wide Unspecified Minor Construction.0 0 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings—Navy Bid Savings .. 0 0 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings—Section 1013 of the 

Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966, AS 

Amended.

0 0 

Total Prior Year Savings ............................................................................... 0 0 

Total Military Construction .......................................................................... 11,011,633 10,366,853 
H. R. 3304—488 

TITLE XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS. 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Discretionary Summary By Appropriation 

Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies 

Appropriation Summary: 

Energy Programs 

Electricity delivery and energy reliability ................... 16,000 0 

Nuclear Energy .............................................................. 94,000 94,000 

Atomic Energy Defense Activities 

National nuclear security administration: 

Weapons activities .................................................. 7,868,409 7,909,252 

Defense nuclear nonproliferation .......................... 2,140,142 2,180,142 

Naval reactors ......................................................... 1,246,134 1,246,134 

Office of the administrator ..................................... 397,784 389,784 

Total, National nuclear security administration 11,652,469 11,725,312 

Environmental and other defense activities: 

Defense environmental cleanup ............................. 5,316,909 5,015,409 

Other defense activities .......................................... 749,080 758,658 

Total, Environmental & other defense activities 6,065,989 5,774,067 

Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities ..................... 17,718,458 17,499,379 

Total, Discretionary Funding ....................................................... 17,828,458 17,593,379 

Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability 

Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability 

Infrastructure security & energy restoration (HS) ............ 16,000 0 

Nuclear Energy 

Idaho sitewide safeguards and security ..................................... 94,000 94,000 

Weapons Activities 

Life extension programs and major alterations 

B61 Life extension program .......................................... 537,044 537,044 

W76 Life extension program ......................................... 235,382 245,082 

W78/88–1 Life extension program ................................ 72,691 72,691 

W88 ALT 370 ................................................................. 169,487 169,487 

Total, Stockpile assessment and design ...................... 1,014,604 1,024,304 

Stockpile systems 

B61 Stockpile systems ................................................... 83,536 83,536 

W76 Stockpile systems .................................................. 47,187 47,187 

W78 Stockpile systems .................................................. 54,381 54,381 

W80 Stockpile systems .................................................. 50,330 50,330 

B83 Stockpile systems ................................................... 54,948 54,948 

W87 Stockpile systems .................................................. 101,506 101,506 

W88 Stockpile systems .................................................. 62,600 62,600 

Stockpile systems 

Total, Stockpile systems ................................................... 454,488 454,488 

Surveillance 

Weapons dismantlement and disposition 

Operations and maintenance ........................................ 49,264 55,264 
H. R. 3304—489 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Stockpile services 

Production support ......................................................... 321,416 345,000 

Research and development support .............................. 26,349 26,349 

R&D certification and safety ......................................... 191,259 191,259 

Management, technology, and production ................... 214,187 214,187 

Plutonium sustainment ................................................. 156,949 156,949 

Total, Stockpile services .................................................. 910,160 933,744 

Total, Directed stockpile work .............................................. 2,428,516 2,467,800 

Campaigns: 

Science campaign 

Advanced certification ................................................... 54,730 54,730 

Primary assessment technologies ................................. 109,231 109,231 

Dynamic materials properties ....................................... 116,965 116,965 

Advanced radiography ................................................... 30,509 30,509 

Secondary assessment technologies .............................. 86,467 86,467 

Total, Science campaign .................................................. 397,902 397,902 

Engineering campaign 

Enhanced surety ............................................................ 51,771 51,771 

Weapon systems engineering assessment technology 23,727 23,727 

Nuclear survivability ..................................................... 19,504 19,504 

Enhanced surveillance ................................................... 54,909 54,909 

Total, Engineering campaign ......................................... 149,911 149,911 

Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield 

campaign 

Ignition ........................................................................... 80,245 80,245 

Support of other stockpile programs ............................ 15,001 15,001 

Diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support ..... 59,897 59,897 

Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion .................... 5,024 5,024 

Joint program in high energy density laboratory 

plasmas ....................................................................... 8,198 8,198 

Facility operations and target production .................... 232,678 232,678 

Total, Inertial confinement fusion and high yield 

campaign .......................................................................... 401,043 401,043 

Advanced simulation and computing campaign ................. 564,329 564,329 

Technology Maturation Campaign 

Readiness Campaign 

Component manufacturing development ..................... 106,085 106,085 

Tritium readiness ........................................................... 91,695 91,695 

Total, Readiness campaign ............................................. 197,780 197,780 

Total, Campaigns ...................................................................... 1,710,965 1,710,965 

Nuclear programs 

Nuclear operations capability .............................................. 265,937 265,937 

Capabilities based investments ............................................ 39,558 39,558 

Construction: 

12–D–301 TRU waste facilities, LANL ........................ 26,722 26,722 

11–D–801 TA–55 Reinvestment project Phase 2, 

LANL ........................................................................... 30,679 30,679 

07–D–220 Radioactive liquid waste treatment facility 

upgrade project, LANL .............................................. 55,719 55,719 

06–D–141 PED/Construction, Uranium Capabilities 

Replacement Project Y–12 ......................................... 325,835 325,835 

Total, Construction ........................................................... 438,955 438,955 
H. R. 3304—490 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Total, Nuclear programs ......................................................... 744,450 744,450 

Secure transportation asset 

Operations and equipment ................................................... 122,072 122,072 

Program direction ................................................................. 97,118 97,118 

Total, Secure transportation asset ....................................... 219,190 219,190 

Site stewardship 

Nuclear materials integration .............................................. 17,679 17,679 

Corporate project management ............................................ 13,017 13,017 

Minority serving institution partnerships program ........... 14,531 14,531 

Enterprise infrastructure 

Site Operations .............................................................. 1,112,455 1,112,455 

Site Support .................................................................... 109,561 109,561 

Sustainment ................................................................... 433,764 433,764 

Facilities disposition ...................................................... 5,000 5,000 

Subtotal, Enterprise infrastructure .............................. 1,660,780 1,660,780 

Total, Site stewardship ............................................................ 1,706,007 1,706,007 

Defense nuclear security 

Operations and maintenance ............................................... 664,981 664,981 

Construction: 

14–D–710 DAF Argus, NNSS ....................................... 14,000 

Total, Defense nuclear security ............................................ 678,981 678,981 

NNSA CIO activities .................................................................... 148,441 150,000 

Legacy contractor pensions .......................................................... 279,597 279,597 

Subtotal, Weapons activities ......................................................... 7,916,147 7,956,990 

Adjustments 

Use of prior year balances .................................................... –47,738 –47,738 

Total, Adjustments .................................................................... –47,738 –47,738 

Total, Weapons Activities ............................................................... 7,868,409 7,909,252 

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs 

Global threat reduction initiative ........................................ 424,487 424,487 

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D 

Operations and maintenance ........................................ 388,838 388,838 

Nonproliferation and international security ....................... 141,675 141,675 

International material protection and cooperation ............ 369,625 369,625 

Fissile materials disposition 

U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition 

Operations and maintenance 

U.S. plutonium disposition ............................. 157,557 157,557 

U.S. uranium disposition ................................ 25,000 25,000 

Total, Operations and maintenance ............... 182,557 182,557 

Construction: 

99–D–143 Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility, Savannah River, SC .............................. 320,000 360,000 
H. R. 3304—491 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Total, Construction ............................................. 320,000 360,000 

Total, U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition 502,557 542,557 

Total, Fissile materials disposition ............................... 502,557 542,557 

Legacy contractor pensions .................................................. 93,703 93,703 

Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs ........ 1,920,885 1,962,444 

Nuclear counterterrorism incident response program .............. 181,293 181,293 

Counterterrorism and counterproliferation programs ............... 74,666 74,666 

Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation ..................... 2,176,844 2,216,844 

Adjustments 

Use of prior year balances .................................................... –36,702 –36,702 

Total, Adjustments .................................................................... –36,702 –36,702 

Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation .................................. 2,140,142 2,180,142 

Naval Reactors 

Naval reactors operations and infrastructure ............................ 455,740 453,740 

Naval reactors development ........................................................ 419,400 419,400 

Ohio replacement reactor systems development ........................ 126,400 126,400 

S8G Prototype refueling .............................................................. 144,400 144,400 

Program direction ......................................................................... 44,404 44,404 

Construction: 

14–D–902 KL Materials characterization laboratory expansion, KAPL ................................................................... 1,000 1,000 

14–D–901 Spent fuel handling recapitalization project, 

NRF .................................................................................... 45,400 45,400 

13–D–905 Remote-handled low-level waste facility, INL .. 21,073 21,073 

13–D–904 KS Radiological work and storage building, 

KSO .................................................................................... 600 2,600 

Naval Reactor Facility, ID .................................................... 1,700 1,700 

Total, Construction .................................................................. 69,773 71,773 

Subtotal, Naval Reactors ................................................................ 1,260,117 1,260,117 

Adjustments: 

Use of prior year balances (Naval reactors) ........................ –13,983 –13,983 

Total, Naval Reactors ...................................................................... 1,246,134 1,246,134 

Office Of The Administrator 

Office of the administrator .......................................................... 397,784 389,784 

Total, Office Of The Administrator ............................................. 397,784 389,784 

Defense Environmental Cleanup 

Closure sites: 

Closure sites administration ................................................ 4,702 4,702 

Hanford site: 

River corridor and other cleanup operations ...................... 393,634 408,634 

Central plateau remediation ................................................ 513,450 513,450 

Richland community and regulatory support ..................... 14,701 14,701 

Total, Hanford site .................................................................... 921,785 936,785 

Idaho National Laboratory: 

Idaho cleanup and waste disposition ................................... 362,100 372,600 

Idaho community and regulatory support ........................... 2,910 2,910 
H. R. 3304—492 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Total, Idaho National Laboratory ......................................... 365,010 375,510 

NNSA sites 

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory .......................... 1,476 1,476 

Nuclear facility D & D Separations Process Research 

Unit ..................................................................................... 23,700 23,700 

Nevada ................................................................................... 61,897 61,897 

Sandia National Laboratories .............................................. 2,814 2,814 

Los Alamos National Laboratory ......................................... 219,789 234,789 

Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites ............................... 309,676 324,676 

Oak Ridge Reservation: 

OR Nuclear facility D & D ................................................... 73,716 73,716 

OR cleanup and disposition .................................................. 115,855 115,855 

OR reservation community and regulatory support ........... 4,365 4,365 

Total, Oak Ridge Reservation ................................................ 193,936 193,936 

Office of River Protection: 

Waste treatment and immobilization plant 

01–D–416 A–E/ORP–0060 / Major construction .......... 690,000 690,000 

Tank farm activities 

Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition ... 520,216 520,216 

Total, Office of River protection ........................................... 1,210,216 1,210,216 

Savannah River sites: 

Savannah River risk management operations .................... 432,491 432,491 

SR community and regulatory support ............................... 11,210 11,210 

Radioactive liquid tank waste: 

Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition ........................................................................ 552,560 657,560 

Construction: 

05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah River ............................................................. 92,000 92,000 

Total, Construction .................................................... 92,000 92,000 

Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste ........................... 644,560 749,560 

Total, Savannah River site ..................................................... 1,088,261 1,193,261 

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant 

Waste isolation pilot plant ................................................... 203,390 219,390 

Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant ......................................... 203,390 219,390 

Program direction ......................................................................... 280,784 280,784 

Program support ........................................................................... 17,979 17,979 

Safeguards and Security: 

Oak Ridge Reservation ......................................................... 18,800 18,800 

Paducah ................................................................................. 9,435 9,435 

Portsmouth ............................................................................ 8,578 8,578 

Richland/Hanford Site .......................................................... 69,078 69,078 

Savannah River Site ............................................................. 121,196 121,196 

Waste Isolation Pilot Project ................................................ 4,977 4,977 

West Valley ............................................................................ 2,015 2,015 

Technology development .............................................................. 24,091 24,091 

Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup ................................. 4,853,909 5,015,409 

Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution ........................... 463,000 0 
H. R. 3304—493 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup ..................................... 5,316,909 5,015,409 

Other Defense Activities 

Health, safety and security 

Health, safety and security .................................................. 143,616 143,616 

Program direction ................................................................. 108,301 108,301 

Total, Health, safety and security ........................................ 251,917 251,917 

Specialized security activities ...................................................... 196,322 205,900 

Office of Legacy Management 

Legacy management ............................................................. 163,271 163,271 

Program direction ................................................................. 13,712 13,712 

Total, Office of Legacy Management ................................... 176,983 176,983 

Defense-related activities 

Defense related administrative support 

Chief financial officer ............................................................ 38,979 38,979 

Chief information officer ....................................................... 79,857 79,857 

Total, Defense related administrative support ................. 118,836 118,836 

Office of hearings and appeals .................................................... 5,022 5,022 

Subtotal, Other defense activities ............................................... 749,080 758,658 

Total, Other Defense Activities .................................................... 749,080 758,658 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.