alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### EDWARDS v. STATE.

No. 25284.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 2, 1951.

Lawrence L. Barber, Seagraves, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for aggravated assault, with punishment assessed at a fine of $150.

What appears to be a narrative statement of facts appears in the transcript. It is not shown to have been filed with the clerk of the trial court.

Art. 760, Sec. 2, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., provides that the statement of facts shall not be copied in the transcript, but when agreed to by the parties and approved by the judge shall be filed in duplicate with the clerk and the original sent up as a part of the record of the cause on appeal.

Under this statute, we are not permitted to consider the statement of facts. See Brewster v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 226 S.W. 2d 124.

The bills of exception appearing in the record were approved and ordered filed on March 20, 1951, which was long after the expiration of the 60 days allowed by the court for their filing. The time of filing is not shown. Also, the bills cannot be appraised in the absence of a statement of facts filed in the trial court. See Price v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 228 S.W.2d 182.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         635,533
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,760,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                   519,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,149,696
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,474,235
<PP&E>                                      15,643,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                 811,979
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,592,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,295,795
<BONDS>                                     19,286,241
<COMMON>                                         4,861
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,598,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,592,520
<SALES>                                     16,641,339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                       13,480,599
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,347,185
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                80,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             614,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (813,792)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (325,442)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (488,350)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (488,350)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### BELT v. STATE.

No. 24510.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1949.

No appearance for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for felony theft, punishment five years in the penitentiary.

It appears by proper proof that after perfecting his appeal to this Court appellant escaped. The jurisdiction of this Court no longer prevails.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                
                                              April 6, 1999

Number Nine Board of Directors
18 Hartwell Ave.
Lexington, MA 02421-3141

Dear Board Members:

    I want to inform you that for personal reasons I'm resigning from Number 
Nine, both from CEO position and from Board of Directors. My last day of 
employment will be May 7th.

    It was a very difficult yet necessary decision for me. The eighteen years of
association with Number Nine from living room startup, through IPO and present 
has been incredibly rich in experiences and sentiments. They will stay with me 
forever.

    I still do believe in Number Nine's mission and its destiny for success. I 
truly with Number Nine and all Niner's the best in this long and winding road.


                                              Sincerely,

                                              /s/ Andrew Najda

                                              Andrew Najda
                                              CEO and Chairman of the Board
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a reviewof the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and ServicingAgreement, dated as of April 14, 2015 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables2015-A Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 26th day of June, 2018.
# Determination to Waive Attachment Provisions Relating to Blocked Property of Terrorist-List States

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of the Treasury

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America, including section 2002(f) of H.R. 3244, “Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000,” (approved October 28, 2000), I hereby determine that subsection (f)(1) of section 1610 of title 28, United States Code, which provides that any property with respect to which financial transactions are prohibited or regulated pursuant to section 5(b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act (50 U.S. App. 5(b), section 620(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2370(a)), sections 202 and 203 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701—1702), and proclamations, orders, regulations, and licenses issued pursuant thereto, be subject to execution or attachment in aid of execution of any judgment relating to a claim for which a foreign state claiming such property is not immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States under section 1605(a)(7) of title 28, United States Code, would impede the ability of the President to conduct foreign policy in the interest of national security and would, in particular, impede the effectiveness of such prohibitions and regulations upon financial transactions. Therefore, pursuant to section 2002(f) of H.R. 3244, the “Victim's of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000,” I hereby waive subsection (f)(1) of section 1610 of title 28, United States Code, in the interest of national security. This waiver, together with the amendment of subsection (f)(2) of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and the repeal of the subsection (b) of section 117 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999, supersedes my prior waiver of the requirements of subsections (a) and (b) of said section 117, executed on October 21, 1998.

                    The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

[FR Doc. 00-28533

Billing code 4710-10-M
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00508-CV

Rudy MENDEZ,

Appellant

v.

City of San Antonio Building 

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO BUILDING STANDARDS BOARD,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-08659

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is 

GRANTED; we WITHDRAW our opinion and judgment dated September 10, 2014, and issue this 

opinion and judgment in their place. 

This appeal is hereby REINSTATED on this court’s docket

SIGNED November 12, 2014.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Overview

 STA’-PUT is a leading brand of 

high-strength adhesives used in 

the commercial surfacing 

industries.

 STA’-PUT answers marketplace 

demands with time-saving 

solutions and environmentally

friendly products that consistently

exceed industry standards for 

performance and quality.
• Canisters

• Drums and Pails

– Flammable and Non-flammable solvent-based

– Water-borne

• Aerosols

• Sustainable Products

– GreenGuard Certified

– LEED Credits

– California and OTC compliant products

STA’-PUT Contact Adhesives
Market Segments

Market Segments

• Commercial 

• Industrial

• Solid Surface, Natural & 

Engineered Stone seams

Product Applications

• Countertop lamination

• Architectural design 

• Rubber flooring

• Fiberglass Reinforced 

Laminate (FRL) 

Market Segments

• Commercial & retail fixtures

• Foam bonding

• Upholstery

• Interior and exterior

Product Applications

• Commercial casework

• Tabletops

• Medical areas

• Decorative items

• Sinks

Market Segments

• Carpet bonding

• Signs

• Inlays

• Entertainment

Product Application

• Headliners

• Boat carpets and interiors

• Movie props

• Insulation

• Building cladding

FABRICATION SPECIALTY FURNITURE
Contact Adhesive Applications
Contact Adhesive Assembly

Adhesive 

Application

Positioning 

Substrates

Making 

the Bond

Finishing 

the Edges
Vapor Pressure Issues

HFC-134a Vapor Pressure 

at 70°F is 70 psig

Honeywell recommends 

blending HFO-1234ze 

with HFC-134a in certain 

technical aerosols
Vapor Pressure Issues

Bad spray pattern caused by inconsistent pressure

Good spray pattern
#### The State, ex rel. Cleveland Trust Co., Trustee, *v.*Pethtel, County Auditor.

(No. 28063

Decided December 31, 1940.)

*526
      *Messrs. Andrews, Hadden & Putnam,*for relator.

*Mr. Lester W. Donaldson,*prosecuting attorney, for respondent.

By the Court.

Counsel for relator admit in their briefs that the writ of prohibition ordinarily is granted only when there is no other adequate remedy, but urge that an exception should be made in this case to prevent extended and expensive litigation — in other words to decide cases in advance.

We adhere to the principle that the high prerogative writ of prohibition will not issue where there is another adequate remedy. *Silliman*v. *Court of Common Pleas,*126 Ohio St., 338, 185 N. E., 420, and cases therein cited.

The demurrer to the petition is sustained and leave to plead further is given.

*Demurrer sustained.*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Turner, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Day, J., dissents.
Exhibit 99.1(a)



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  HomeSeekers.com,   Inc,  (the
 "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
 Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Thomas
 Chaffee,  Chairman  of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,
 certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 (1)     The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2)     The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




 /S/ Thomas Chaffee
 -------------------------
 Thomas Chaffee
 Chairman of the Board and
 Chief Executive Officer
 June 2, 2003



                                       17
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

PC MALL, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PC Mall, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Frank F. Khulusi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                       
|-----------------------
|August 7, 2006         
|                       
|/s/ Frank F. Khulusi   
|Frank F. Khulusi       
|Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.2










STATEMENT
OF EDWARD W. WILHELM,


EXECUTIVE
VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF BORDERS GROUP, INC.


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I, Edward
W. Wilhelm, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 1, 2008,
of Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that
the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Borders
Group, Inc.




















Date:
_December 11,
2008_







/s/EDWARD W.
WILHELM


Edward W.
Wilhelm


Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Borders
Group, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2862]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Notice Regarding HRSA Grant Requirement--Participation in the 
340B Drug Pricing Program

AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) is 
announcing its decision to withdraw the proposal to impose a grant 
award requirement that would have required HRSA grantees listed in 
section 340B of the Public Health Service Act and Federally Qualified 
Health Center (FQHC) Look-Alikes to participate in the 340B Drug 
Pricing Program or provide good cause for non-participation. Instead of 
the proposed grant requirement, HRSA will add a statement to the Notice 
of Grant Award (NGA) concerning the need for grantees to determine the 
appropriateness of their drug purchasing practices under applicable 
cost principles.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Captain Robert Staley, the Office of 
Drug Pricing, Bureau of Primary Health Care, Health Resources and 
Services Administration, 10th Floor, East West Towers, 4350 East-West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; Phone (800) 628-6297; Fax (301) 594-4982.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed grant requirement for eligible 
HRSA grantee and FQHC Look-Alike participation in the 340B Drug Pricing 
Program was announced in the Federal Register at 63 FR 56656 on October 
22, 1998. A period of 60 days was established to allow interested 
parties to submit comments. HRSA received 21 comments. In light of the 
concerns expressed about the potential adverse impact of the proposed 
grant requirement, HRSA has decided not to institute the requirement at 
this time. Instead, HRSA will implement another administrative option 
to increase participation in the 340B Drug Pricing Program: a statement 
in the HRSA Notice of Grant Award (NGA) encouraging those grantees not 
participating in the 340B Program to determine whether their drug 
purchasing practices meet Federal requirements regarding reasonable and 
cost effective purchasing. (See 42 CFR part 50, subpart E, and OMB 
Circulars A-122 and A-87 regarding cost principles). If grantees can 
obtain drugs through the Drug Pricing Program at lower cost, it would 
be reasonable to take advantage of such cost savings. This policy will 
be implemented during the fiscal year (FY) 2000 grant award cycle.

    Dated: January 3, 2000.
Claude Earl Fox,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-2862 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
Case 3:22-cv-00735-S-BN Document 8 Filed 04/26/22 Page 1 of 6 PageID 96
Case 3:22-cv-00735-S-BN Document 8 Filed 04/26/22 Page 2 of 6 PageID 97
Case 3:22-cv-00735-S-BN Document 8 Filed 04/26/22 Page 3 of 6 PageID 98
Case 3:22-cv-00735-S-BN Document 8 Filed 04/26/22 Page 4 of 6 PageID 99
Case 3:22-cv-00735-S-BN Document 8 Filed 04/26/22 Page 5 of 6 PageID 100
Case 3:22-cv-00735-S-BN Document 8 Filed 04/26/22 Page 6 of 6 PageID 101
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-4407 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, and KIRELL FRANCIS TAYLOR, a/k/a Sadeeq Abdul Al Haqq; Dr. Sadeeq Abdul Al Haqq Kirell, Intervenor - Appellant, versus ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI, a/k/a Shaqil, a/k/a Abu Khalid al Sahrawi, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:01-cr-00455-LMB) Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 19, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kirell Francis Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kirell Francis Taylor appeals a district court order denying his motion to intervene. We agree with the district court that the motion was frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Taylor’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss his appeal as frivolous. We also deny his motion for an injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

            In connection with the quarterly report of PC Mall, Inc., a Delawarecorporation, and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"Report"), I, Frank F. Khulusi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

                    (1)  the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

                    (2)  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.  

              This Certification has notbeen, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 190 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session 

                            H. CON. RES. 190

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
                  In the Senate of the United States,

                      November 22 (legislative day, November 23), 1992.
      Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives 
(H. Con. Res. 190) entitled ``Concurrent resolution providing for the 
sine die adjournment of the First Session of the One hundred Third 
Congress'' do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

    Page 1 line 3, strike out all after ``of'' down to and including 
``23,'' in line 5 and insert: Friday, November 26, or the legislative 
day of Tuesday, November 30, or the legislative day of Wednesday 
December 1,
            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### WILKINSON et ux. v. STATE.

No. 24592.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 11, 1950.

None on appeal.

E. W. Boedeker, County Attorney, Level-land, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Both appellants were convicted by the jury and each fined the sum of $100 for the unlawful possessipn of whisky in a. dry area.

The testimony shows that Lubbock County is a dry area under the law. On the date in question the Sheriff of that County, his deputy, and a Texas Liquor Control Board Agent, being in possession of a search warrant, approached the home of the appellants; that Mrs. Wilkinson ran into the house immediately and began to break some bottles which evidently contained whisky. ■ She broke five bottles, but the officer following her found two bottles which were not broken. No defense was offered, and' we think the testimony was sufficient to show guilt.

There are no bills of ' exception in the record.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.