alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                9

<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              13,676
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             244,720
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    18,405
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          8,035
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              57,184
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                57,505
<LOANS>                                            190,966
<ALLOWANCE>                                            723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     302,737
<DEPOSITS>                                         245,270
<SHORT-TERM>                                           552
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  1,172
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             5,196
<OTHER-SE>                                          44,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                     302,737
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                     13,735
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    6,574
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                         0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                    20,309
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                  12,114
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      57
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                8,138
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                          192
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                        700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      5,201
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           5,201
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         3,306
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .64
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        2.85
<LOANS-NON>                                          2,519
<LOANS-PAST>                                             0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      2,519
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                       536
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                            5
<RECOVERIES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                      723
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                723
        


</TABLE>
Case 4:22-cr-00073-O Document 73 Filed 03/30/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 159
Case 4:22-cr-00073-O Document 73 Filed 03/30/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 160
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 115 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 115

 Providing for an adjournment of the House from the legislative day of 
Thursday, July 1, 1993 to Tuesday, July 13, 1993 and an adjournment or 
  recess of the Senate from Thursday, July 1, 1993 or Friday, July 2, 
                   1993 until Tuesday, July 13, 1993.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 1993

 Mr. Gephardt submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for an adjournment of the House from the legislative day of 
Thursday, July 1, 1993 to Tuesday, July 13, 1993 and an adjournment or 
  recess of the Senate from Thursday, July 1, 1993 or Friday, July 2, 
                   1993 until Tuesday, July 13, 1993.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, July 
1, 1993, it stand adjourned until noon on Tuesday, July 13, 1993, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of 
business on Thursday, July 1, 1993 or Friday, July 2, 1993, pursuant to 
a motion made by the Majority Leader, or his designee, in accordance 
with this resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon, or 
until such time as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his 
designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, on Tuesday, July 13, 1993, 
or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

                                 <all>
```
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3

v. No. A-1-CA-36896 4 MARIO GOMEZ, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY 7 Fernando R. Macias, District Judge 8 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 Lauren J. Wolongevicz, Assistant Attorney General 11 Albuquerque, NM 12 for Appellee 13 L. Helen Bennett, P.C. 14 L. Helen Bennett 15 Albuquerque, NM 16 for Appellant 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 HANISEE, Judge. 19{1} Defendant appeals following the districtcourt entering judgment against him 1 that included a requirement that Defendan t pay restitution to the Metro Narcotics 2 Agency Contingency Fund. On appeal, Defendant contends that the district court’s 3 requirement that Defendant pay restitution was not a proper legal remedy in this case 4 and/or, “even if restitution is found to be proper, [he] should notbe required to pay 5 restitution on dismissed conspiracy counts.” [DS 3] This Court issued a second 6 calendar notice proposing to conclude that , because Defendant was only convicted on 7 one count of trafficking and the remaini ng two conspiracy to commit trafficking 8 charges were dismissed, onl y $150 of restitution was proper. 9

{2} In response, the State has filed a notice indicating that it will not file a 10 memorandum in opposition to this Court’s s econd calendar notice, and Defendant has 11 filed a memorandum in opposition continui ng to argue that the Metro Narcotics 12 Agency cannot be a “victim” for the purpos e of restitution. As Defendant makes no 13 new arguments regarding restitution, see State v. Mondragon , 1988-NMCA-027, ¶ 10, 14 107 N.M. 421, 759 P.2d 1003 (providing that a party responding to a summary 15 calendar notice must come forw ard and specifically point out errors of law and fact, 16 and the repetition of earlier arguments does not fulfill this requirement), superceded 17 by statute on other grounds as stated in State v. Harris , 2013-NMCA-031, ¶ 3, 297 182 P.3d 374, we proceed with summary affirm ance, in part, and summary reversal, in 1 part. 2

{3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 5

WE CONCUR: 6

7 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 8

9 JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge 10
EX-10.11



 




Exhibit 10.11




WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION




SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH NAMED EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS



     
The named executive officers of Western Alliance Bancorporation
(the “Company”) are “at will” employees
lacking written employment agreements with the Company. The
annual base salaries of the named executive officers are set
annually by the Company’s Board of Directors, based on the
Compensation Committee’s recommendation. For 2006, the
annual base salaries of the Company’s named executive
officers are as follows:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
    
    Robert Sarver

    	 	Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer	 	$	550,000	 
	
    
    Larry Woodrum

    	 	Executive Vice President,
Nevada Administration	 	$	330,000	 
	
    
    Dale Gibbons

    	 	Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer	 	$	260,000	 
	
    
    James Lundy

    	 	Executive Vice President,
Arizona Administration	 	$	225,000	 
	
    
    Linda Mahan

    	 	Executive Vice President,
Operations	 	$	185,000	 




     
In addition to their base salary, each of the named executive
officers is eligible for a bonus and to participate in the
Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1
 
                        OUTSOURCING SERVICES GROUP, INC.
                         FIXED CHARGE RATIO COMPUTATION
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             THREE MONTH
                                                            PERIOD ENDED
                                                           OCTOBER 1, 1996
                                                              (DATE OF
                                                             INCEPTION)
                                                                 TO             YEAR ENDED         YEAR ENDED
                                                          DECEMBER 31, 1996  DECEMBER 31, 1997  DECEMBER 31, 1998
                                                          -----------------  -----------------  -----------------
<S>                                                       <C>                <C>                <C>
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
 
Income (loss) before taxes..............................      $    (146)         $     260          $  (1,744)
 
Fixed charges reflected in income (loss)
 before taxes
  Interest expense......................................            204              2,232             12,446
  One-third of rental expenses..........................            126                311                776
                                                                 ------            -------            -------
 
Total Fixed Charges.....................................      $     330          $   2,543          $  13,222
                                                                 ------            -------            -------
                                                                 ------            -------            -------
 
Income before taxes plus fixed charges
 above..................................................      $     184          $   2,803          $  11,478
 
Fixed charge ratio......................................           0.56x              1.10x              0.87x
  Deficiency............................................      $     146                 --          $   1,744
</TABLE>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000518 02-JAN-2015 10:25 AM
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 32 (b)

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Northland Cable Television, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, Gary
Jones, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

      (1)   The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
            or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
            78(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

DATE: 3-31-05

/s/ GARY S. JONES
Gary S. Jones
President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Northland Cable Television, Inc. and will be retained by Northland
Cable Television, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                              ESSEX PORTFOLIO, L.P.
   Schedule of computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred
              Stock Dividends (Dollars in thousands, except ratios)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Years ended December 31
                                            ----------------------------------------------------------
                                              2001      2000      1999      1998      1997      1996
                                            --------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
<S>                                         <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Earnings:
 Income before minority interests
      and extraordinary item                $ 72,944   $68,222   $61,616   $40,600   $34,146   $14,970
 Interest expense                             39,105    30,384    21,268    19,374    12,659    11,442
 Amortization of deferred financing costs        657       639       566       718       509       639
                                            --------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
  Total earnings                            $112,706   $99,245   $83,450   $60,692   $47,314   $27,051
                                            ========   =======   =======   =======   =======   =======

Fixed charges:
 Interest expense                           $ 39,105   $30,384   $21,268   $19,374   $12,659   $11,442
 Amortization of deferred financing costs        657       639       566       718       509       639
 Capitalized interest                          3,917     2,906     5,172     3,494     1,276       115
 Convertible preferred stock dividends            --       246     1,333     3,500     2,681       635
 Perpetual preferred unit distributions       18,319    18,319    12,238     5,595        --        --
                                            --------   -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
 Total fixed charges and preferred
      stock dividends                       $ 61,998   $52,494   $40,577   $32,681   $17,125   $12,831
                                            ========   =======   =======   =======   =======   =======

 Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
 (excluding preferred stock dividends)          2.58X     2.93X     3.09X     2.57X     3.28X     2.22X
                                            ========   =======   =======   =======   =======   =======

 Ratio of earnings to combined fixed
      charges and preferred dividends           1.82X     1.89X     2.06X     1.86X     2.76X     2.11X
                                            ========   =======   =======   =======   =======   =======
</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7740

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. HAFEEZ ODOFFIN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News

. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 4:16

- cr - 00049

- RAJ

- LRL

- 4; 4:19

- cv - 00040

- RAJ )

Submitted : April 29, 2020 Decided: June 5, 2020

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Hafeez Odoffin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Hafeez Odoffin seeks to appeal the district court’s or der denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 (201 8 ) motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ) (201 8 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (201 8 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debata ble and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Odoffin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<PAGE>
 
SGV BANCORP, INC.
EXHIBIT NO. 11: STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                  Three months ended
                                  September 30, 1997
                                  ------------------
                         (in thousands except per share amounts)
<S>                              <C>
Net Earnings                                $  331
                                            ======
 
Weighted average shares outstanding          2,154

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive
 effect on stock options                       116
                                            ------
 
Total weighted average common shares
 and equivalents outstanding                 2,270
                                            ======
 
Primary earnings per share                  $ 0.15
                                            ======

</TABLE>
Filed 7/15/24 P. v. Young CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions 

not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion 

has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

 Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JESSIE ANNE YOUNG,

 Defendant and Appellant.

2d Crim. No. B333755

(Super. Ct. No. SCS314955)

(Ventura County)

In August 2020, police stopped a vehicle that had entered 

the United States through the San Ysidro Port of Entry. During 

a subsequent search, they found narcotics in the vehicle. Jessie 

Anne Young, a passenger in the vehicle, later revealed she had 

fentanyl in her rectum. She said she had bought the fentanyl in

Mexico to sell in the United States. 

Young pleaded guilty to transporting fentanyl for sale in 

San Diego County Superior Court. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.) 

The trial court suspended imposition of sentence, and ordered 

Young to serve two years of formal probation. The matter was 

then transferred to Ventura County for probation supervision. 
2

Over the next few months, the trial court twice found that 

Young had violated the terms of her probation. After the second 

violation, the court revoked probation and sentenced Young to 

three years in county jail. 

We appointed counsel to represent Young in this appeal. 

After counsel examined the record, he filed an opening brief that 

raises no arguable issues. On April 18, 2024, we advised Young

by mail that she had 30 days to submit any contentions or issues 

she wished us to consider. We have not received a response.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that 

Young’s attorney fully complied with his responsibilities and that 

no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 

441.) 

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

BALTODANO, J.

We concur:

GILBERT, P. J.

CODY, J.
Kristi J. Peariso, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of 

Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 18 , 2021 

# Order

Clerk August 18 , 2021

163072 ( 66 )

PETERSEN FINANCIAL, LLC,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 163072

v COA: 350208

Kent CC: 16

- 011820

- CH

CITY OF KENTWOOD,

Defendant

- Appellant

and

KENT COUNTY TREASURER,

Defendant

- Appellee

. _________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of the Michigan Municipal League and the

Government Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan to file a reply to plaintiff

- appellee ’s

response to its brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The re ply submitted on August 12 , 2021,

is accepted for filing.