alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Amended Annual Report of Entrust Financial Services, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2001 as
filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report). I, Scott J. Sax, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 USC § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Scott J. Sax
Scott J. Sax, Chief Executive Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------

Dated: MARCH
13, 2003
#### TUMLINSON et al. v. CITY OF BROWNSVILLE et al.

No. 11386.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Feb. 16, 1944.

Rehearing Denied March 16, 1944.

H. L. Yates and West & Hightower, all of Brownsville, for appellants.

C. S. Eidman, Jr., of Brownsville, for appellees.

NORVELL, Justice.

This action was brought by Lon Tumlin-son and others, seeking a recoveiy of damages against the City of Brownsville, A. E. Munday, city manager of the City of Brownsville, Standard Accident Insurance Company, the surety upon_ Munday’s official bond, and Roy Weller, the fire chief or head of the fire department of said City of Brownsville. Plaintiffs below and appellants here complained that through negligence of Weller, the fire chief, and firemen serving under him, their property had not been properly protected from fire and as a result had been destroyed.

The trial court sustained a number of exceptions to plaintiffs’ petition and, upon plaintiffs’ refusal to amend, dismissed the cause as to the City, the city manager and his surety. Plaintiffs then dismissed as to the fire chief, Roy Weller. Whereupon the court rendered a final judgment of dismissal, from which this appeal was taken.

We are of the opinion that the petition stated no facts upon which relief could be awarded to appellants as against the City of Brownsville.

“* * * providing fire protection is a governmental function and the City is not liable for the negligence of its officers and employees in the performance of that function.” City of Port Arthur v. Wallace, Tex.Sup., 171 S.W.2d 480, 481. While the City of Brownsville is a Home Rule City (Article 11, Sec. 5, Constitution of Texas, Vernon’s Ann.St.), this *circum*
      *547stance does not affect the application of the rule stated. Shanewerk v. City of Ft. Worth, 11 Tex.Civ.App. 271, 32 S.W. 918. We do not construe the charter provisions of the City Charter of Brownsville as attempting to extend or enlarge the liability of the City in regard to the situation presented here.

We are likewise of the opinion that there were no grounds for relief as against the city manager (or his surety) set forth in the petition. The charter of the City of Brownsville does vest substantial powers in the city manager. He is the executive head of the municipal government and thus exercises control over the fire chief and the fire department. The petition does not allege, however, that Munday was present at the fire here involved and exercised direction and control over the actions of the fire chief or the firemen there engaged. We believe the general rule stated by Cardozo, J., in Dowler v. Johnson, 225 N.Y. 39, 121 N.E. 487, 3 A.L.R. 146, has application here, viz., “* * * public officers are not liable for the negligence of their subordinates unless they co-operate in the act complained of, or direct or encourage it.” See also, Story on Agency, 9th Ed., § 319; Clough v. Worsham, 32 Tex.Civ.App. 187, 74 S.W. 350.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Amended Annual Report of Entrust Financial Services, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2001 as
filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report). I, Scott J. Sax, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 USC § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Scott J. Sax
Scott J. Sax, Chief Executive Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------

Dated: FEBRUARY
14, 2003
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7542

SAMUEL KEITH JACKSON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ANTHONY PADULA, Warden of Lee Correctional Institution, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (0:06-cv-01837-TLW) Submitted: October 22, 2008 Decided: November 21, 2008 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Keith Jackson, A ppellant Pro Se. Henry Dargan McMaster, Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, John William McIntosh, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Samuel Keith Jackson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jackson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
10-QSB June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          491,605
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                        2,571,569
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                3,072,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         2,201,589
<BONDS>                                       2,040,150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              6
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1,169,416)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  3,072,329
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    980
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                412,644
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               40,217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (451,881)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (451,881)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (451,881)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2








STATEMENT OF GLEN TOMASZEWSKI,


INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF BORDERS GROUP, INC.


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I, Glen Tomaszewski, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010, of Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Borders Group, Inc.




















Date: September 1, 2010







/s/ GLEN TOMASZEWSKI


Glen Tomaszewski


Interim Chief Financial Officer


Borders Group, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000939915
<NAME> NYNEX CABLECOMMS GROUP PLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> POUNDS STERLING
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.6448
<CASH>                                           7,072
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,334
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,799
<PP&E>                                       1,273,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                 130,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,273,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,125
<BONDS>                                        492,649
<COMMON>                                        98,367
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     491,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,273,318
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,527
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,787
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,853)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,853)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,853)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.128)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.128)
        

</TABLE>
#### GROSS v. STATE.

No. 26684.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 16, 1953.

■ MaysMays, Dave Miller,'by Chas. Mays, Fort Worth, for. appellant.

Howard M. Fender,. Crim. Dist. Atty., Gerald Murad, Conard Florence, Asst. Dist. Attys., Fort Worth, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is unlawfully practicing dentistry without a license, the punishment, a fine of $500.

The witness Moorhead testified that on the day in question he went to the appellant’s house in Tarrant County; that when he got there he found a lady seated 'behind a desk in the living room or reception room; that he saw seven or eight people there; that after waiting some time the appellant came in and asked the witness what he could do for him; that the witness told appellant he wanted a lower plate made; that they agreed upon a price; that the appellant took the witness into his office, seated him in a doctor or dentist chair and made an impression. The witness further testified that the’ appellant subsequently made a lower derital plate for him and charged him $25 for the same.

The witness stated that he did some investigating for the State Dental Board and was paid by them for such work.

The prior conviction was proved, and it was established by the witness Gamer that appellant did not have a license to practice dentistry.

Appellant presents only one bill of exception, which, relates to that portion of the court’s charge in which he copied verbatim Article 754b, Vernon’s Ann.P.C.

Appellant contends that the use of the word “shall” in the charge, as referred to above, told the jury that they must convict the appellant and is thus on the weight of the evidence. We do not agree with such contention. The court merely told the jury that Moorhfead was an accomplice and, in the words of the statute, Art. 754b, V. A.P.C., as amended by the 52nd Leg., that *952if they believed him then' ,his 'iestiniony would be sufficient to convict.

We here observe, however, that in view of the statute the ¡better practice would be to omit in 'the charge any question of-the witness being an accomplice. '

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. ■
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 65866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28102]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health Human Development; Notice of 
Closed Meeting.

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of person privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: December 3-4, 2000.
    Time: 8 am to 5 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Chevy Chase Holiday Inn, Terrace Room, 5520 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Scott F. Andres, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 
6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E03, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 25, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-28102 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
August 6, 2015 

Manager, Flight Standards Service 

Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Office 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

The purpose of this packet is to respectfully request an amendment to Exemption No. 12012 in 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1474.

ArgenTech Solutions requests the addition of the following aircraft to our existing Exemption 

No.12012 in Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1474. 

The additional aircraft requested is the DJI Inspire multi-rotor. 

ArgenTech Solutions existing safety standards and procedures as outlined in our Flight 

Operation & Procedures Manual (F2500) will continue for the additional aircraft. We will follow 

the recommended Maintenance and operations parameters set forth by DJI. All the statements 

made in our original petition would remain unchanged with the exception of the " DJI Inspire, 

model being added to where the other model is listed.   The Operations Manual, Maintenance 

Manual, and the updated specification document have been attached for your information.

Respectfully, 

Marcel Piet 

President-UAS Services 

603-836-0588 X122 | Cell: 207-651-3476 

email: mpiet@agts.us
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAINA ANN HELEN GRUSH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 176 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             108
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   110
<PP&E>                                              76
<DEPRECIATION>                                      71
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               67
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       115
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00



</TABLE>
Case 3:22-cv-00594-E-BT Document 3 Filed 03/14/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 5
Case 3:22-cv-00594-E-BT Document 3 Filed 03/14/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 6
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                              List of Subsidiaries

     1.   Essex Portfolio, L.P., a California limited partnership
     2.   Essex Management Corporation, a California corporation
     3.   Essex-Palisades Facilitator, a California limited partnership
     4.   Essex Sunpointe Limited, a California limited partnership
     5.   Essex Washington Interest Partners, a California general partnership
     6.   Essex San Ramon Partners L.P., a California limited partnership
     7.   Essex Bristol Partners, L.P., a California limited partnership
     8.   Essex Fidelity I Corporation, a California corporation
     9.   Essex Camarillo Corporation, a California corporation
     10.  Essex Camarillo L.P., a California limited partnership
     11.  Essex Meadowood Corporation, a California corporation
     12.  Essex Bunker Hill Corporation, a California corporation
     13.  Essex Meadowood, L.P., a California limited partnership
     14.  Essex Treetops Corporation, a California corporation
     15.  Essex Treetops, L.P., a California limited partnership
     16.  Essex Bluffs, L.P., a California limited partnership
     17.  Essex Huntington Breakers, L.P., a California limited partnership
     18.  Essex Stonehedge, L.P., a California limited partnership
     19.  Essex Bridle Trails, L.P., a California limited partnership
     20.  Essex Spring Lake, L.P., a California limited partnership
     21.  Essex Maple Leaf, L.P., a California limited partnership
     22.  Essex Riverfront, L.P., a California limited partnership
     23.  Essex Casa Mango, L.P., a California limited partnership
     24.  Essex Bunker Hill, L.P., a California limited partnership
     25.  Essex Westwood, L.P. a California limited partnership
# Continuation of Sudan Emergency

On November 3, 1997, by Executive Order 13067, I declared a national emergency to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of the Government of Sudan. By Executive Order 13067, I imposed trade sanctions on Sudan and blocked Sudanese government assets. Because the Government of Sudan has continued its activities hostile to United States interests, the national emergency declared on November 3, 1997, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency must continue in effect beyond November 3, 2000. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency for 1 year with respect to Sudan.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         **Federal Register**                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 00-28368

Billing code 3195-01-P