alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         635,533
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,760,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                   519,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,149,696
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,491,800
<PP&E>                                      17,818,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                 855,893
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,741,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,295,795
<BONDS>                                     19,286,241
<COMMON>                                         4,861
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,747,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,741,171
<SALES>                                     16,641,339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                       13,522,998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,348,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                80,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             614,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (857,706)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (343,007)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (514,699)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (514,699)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Marcus New, Chief Executive Officer,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on
Form 10-KSB of Stockgroup Information Systems Inc. (the "Company");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4. The Company's other certifying officer
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in the Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over
financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to
be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financials statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the
Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

d) disclosed in this report any change in
the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The Company's other certifying officer
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
the Company's board of directors:

a) all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
Company's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: May 1, 2006

/s/ Marcus NewMarcus NewChief Executive
Officer

---
```

[Federal Register: July 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 130)]
[Notices]               
[Page 39324]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08jy10-145]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

 
Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending June 5, 2010

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.).
    The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to 
Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the 
Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. 
Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a 
tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further 
proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2006-25940.
    Date Filed: June 3, 2010.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: June 24, 2010.
    Description: Application of Kuzu Havayollari Kargo Tasimacilik A.S 
requesting the Department issue an amended foreign air carrier permit 
of its current charter authority in the name of ULS Havayollari Kargo 
Tasimacilik S.A.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-16609 Filed 7-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

K.D.G., INC. d/b/a WILDCAT,

Appellant,

v.

WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, and COHEN 

DANIA BEACH HOTEL, LLC, a foreign limited liability company,

Appellees.

No. 4D18-3314 

[June 12, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Mily Rodriguez-Powell, Judge; L.T. Case No. 17-006588 

(03).

Michael J. Yates of the Law Offices of Michael J. Yates, P.L., Miami, for 

appellant.

Alex P. Rosenthal, Amanda Jassem Jones, and Rhiannon Sforza-Flick 

of Rosenthal Law Group, Weston, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lee v. All Fla. Constr. Co., 662 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 3d DCA 

1995). 

DAMOORGIAN, LEVINE and KUNTZ, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### BLACKBURN v. STATE.

No. 22393.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 10, 1943.

Rollie Fancher, of Seymour, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

■Conviction is for unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor in dry area, punishment assessed at a fine of one hundred dollars.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are found in the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         113,328
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,414,776
<ALLOWANCES>                                   214,382
<INVENTORY>                                  1,279,752
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,910,933
<PP&E>                                       1,128,683
<DEPRECIATION>                                 173,713
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,453,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,597,060
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        399
<COMMON>                                         4,049
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,851,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,453,248
<SALES>                                      3,308,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,308,164
<CGS>                                        1,353,034
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,151,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               109,772
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,621,380)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,621,380)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,621,380)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.49)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Amended Annual Report of Entrust Financial Services, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2001 as
filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report). I, David A. Hite, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 USC § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ David A. Hite
David A. Hite, Chief Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------

Dated: FEBRUARY
11, 2003
United States District Court

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:22-CR-00117-S

§

SANTIAGO SALAZAR-RAMIREZ (1) §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

SANTIAGO SALAZAR-RAMIREZ (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th 

Cir. 1997), has appeared before me pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count One of the 

Indictment. After cautioning and examining SANTIAGO SALAZAR-RAMIREZ (1) under oath concerning each of the 

subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense 

charged is supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore 

recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that SANTIAGO SALAZAR-RAMIREZ (1) be adjudged guilty of 

8 U.S.C. 1326(a), Illegal Reentry After Removal from the United States, and have sentence imposed accordingly. After 

being found guilty of the offense by the District Judge: 

☐ The Defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. 

☐ The Defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The Defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release. 

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). 

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The Defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release. 

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The Defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless: (1)(a) the Court finds there is 

a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the Defendant should not be detained; and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released. 

SIGNED June 14, 2022. 

 

 _____________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B). 

FILED

KAREN MITCHELL

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT 

COURT June 14, 2022

Case 3:22-cr-00117-S Document 24 Filed 06/14/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 41
Having considered the petition and the attached documents,

we conclude that our intervention by extraordinary writ relief is not warranted. See NRS 34.160; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. While we are concerned by petitioner's contention that this motion has been pending for over 14 months, we trust that the district court will resolve the matters pending before it as promptly as its calendar permits. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED. 1

J.

, J. Saitta

1 We direct the clerk of this court to file petitioner's February 27, 2013, motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and we conclude that no action is necessary on this motion or on petitioner's July 17, 2013, motion to proceed in forma pauperis as an order waiving the filing fee has been entered. We also direct the clerk of this court to file the March 12, 2013, proper person notice of change of address, and the May 8, 2013, proper person request for submission of pleadings, and we conclude that no action is necessary on these documents. Further, we direct the clerk of this court to file the proper person motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus, provisionally received on July 26, 2013, and in light of this order, we deny the motion as moot.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2cc: Felton L. Matthews, Jr. Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 11.1

SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED                     SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                      SEPTEMBER 30,                         SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                 1998               1997               1998               1997
                                                              ----------         ----------         ----------         ----------
<S>                                                           <C>                <C>                <C>                <C>      
Net loss applicable to common stock                             (800,208)          (470,084)        (1,074,814)          (767,217)

Weighted average number of common shares equivalent:
Common shares outstanding                                      4,541,266          3,684,428          4,563,207          3,684,428
Common equivalent shares representing shares
  issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants

Incremental common equivalent shares (calculated                       0                  0                  0                  0
  using the higher of end of period or average fair
  market value)

    Total weighted average shares - as adjusted                4,541,266          3,684,428          4,563,207          3,684,428

    Basic                                                          (0.18)             (0.13)             (0.24)             (0.21)
    Diluted                                                        (0.18)             (0.13)             (0.24)             (0.21)
</TABLE>


                                                                              15
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

                                    Term Note

$1,308,411.21                                                      July 29, 1999

      ACT Manufacturing, Inc. and CMC Industries, Inc. (collectively the
"Borrowers"), for value received, hereby jointly and severally promise to pay to
the order of Firstar Bank, N.A. (the "Lender") at the office of The Chase
Manhattan Bank at One Chase Square, Rochester, New York 14643, for the account
of the Lender, the principal sum of One Million Three Hundred Eight Thousand
Four Hundred Eleven Dollars and 21/100 ($1,308,411.21), in lawful money of the
United States of America and in immediately available funds, on the date(s) and
in the manner provided in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement described
below. The Borrowers also promise to pay interest on the unpaid principal
balance hereof, for the period such balance is outstanding, at said principal
office for the account of said Lender, in like money, at the rates of interest
as provided in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement described below, on the
date(s) and in the manner provided in said Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement.

      This is one of the Notes referred to in that certain Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement (as amended from time to time the "Credit Agreement") dated as
of July 29, 1999 among the Borrowers, the Subsidiary Guarantor named therein,
the Lenders named therein (including the Lender), and The Chase Manhattan Bank,
as Agent, and evidences the Term Loans made by the Lender to the Borrowers
thereunder. All terms not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them
in the Credit Agreement.

      The Credit Agreement provides for the acceleration of the maturity of
principal upon the occurrence and during the continuance of certain Events of
Default and for prepayments on the terms and conditions specified therein.

      The Borrowers waive presentment, notice of dishonor, protest and any other
notice or formality with respect to this Note.
<PAGE>

      This Note shall be governed by, and interpreted and construed in
accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.

ATTEST:                                   ACT MANUFACTURING, INC.


By:                                       By:   /s/ Jeffrey B. Lavin
   ------------------------------            -----------------------------------
Name:                                     Name:       Jeffrey B. Lavin
                                          Title:      Chief Financial Officer


ATTEST:                                   CMC INDUSTRIES, INC.


By:                                       By:   /s/ Jeffrey B. Lavin
   ------------------------------            -----------------------------------
                                          Name:       Jeffrey B. Lavin
                                          Title:      Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Hyperdynamics Corporation
        (Hyperdynamics), on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Steven M. Plumb,
        Chief Financial Officer of Hyperdynamics, does hereby certify, pursuant to
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to his
        knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
          May
          22, 2007





By:
            /s/
                Steven M. PlumbSteven
                M. PlumbChief
                Financial OfficerPrincipal
              Accounting Officer