alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 161

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 7 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 27), 1993

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the House from Thursday,

October 7, 1993 or Friday, October 8, 1993 to Tuesday,

October 12, 1993 and an adjournment or recess of the

Senate from Thursday, October 7, 1993 to Wednesday,

October 13, 1993.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on Thursday,

3 October 7, 1993 or Friday, October 8, 1993, pursuant to

4 a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee,

5 it stand adjourned until noon on Tuesday, October 12,

6 1993, or until noon on the second day after Members are

7 notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concur8 rent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the

9 Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on

10 Thursday, October 7, 1993, pursuant to a motion made
2

HCON 161 RDS

1 by the Majority Leader or his designee, in accordance with

2 this resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon

3 on Wednesday, October 13, 1993, or at such time as may

4 be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the

5 motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second

6 day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to

7 section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs

8 first.

9 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

10 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

11 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead12 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

13 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

14 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives October 7,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,084
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  213,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,899
<INVENTORY>                                      2,048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               228,932
<PP&E>                                         906,102
<DEPRECIATION>                                 205,961
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,135,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          211,455
<BONDS>                                        527,101
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     311,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,135,477
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,140,435
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  953,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               115,050
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12,698
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,831
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                109,252
<INCOME-TAX>                                    79,680
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,924
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,660)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,264
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       29
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [NM-930-1310-01; NMNM 1804]

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lourdes B. Ortiz, BLM, New Mexico State Office, (505) 438-7586.

Dated: October 24, 2000.

Lourdes B. Ortiz,

Land Law Examiner.

[FR Doc. 00-28209  Filed 11-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
EXHIBIT
      32.2








STATEMENT
      OF EDWARD W. WILHELM,


EXECUTIVE
      VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF BORDERS GROUP, INC.


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I,
      Edward
      W. Wilhelm, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 5, 2007, of
      Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
      that
      the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Borders
      Group, Inc.




















Date:/s/
      EDWARD W. WILHELM


Edward
      W.
      Wilhelm


Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Borders
      Group, Inc.
Order entered December 20, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-01033-CR

ADDISON DOUGLAS MAYS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-84413-2019

ORDER

On October 26, 2022, this Court ordered Stephanie Duecker Hudson, 

counsel for appellant, to notify this Court by November 18, 2022, whether she 

intended to (1) file a new brief replacing the January 28, 2022 brief filed by former 

counsel; (2) file a supplemental brief; or (3) adopt the January 28, 2022 brief as 

filed. As of the date of this order, Ms. Hudson has not responded to the October 

26, 2022 order. Accordingly, we presume counsel intends to adopt the January 28, 

2022 brief as filed, and the case will be submitted with that brief.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of this order to: the 

Honorable Tom Nowak, Presiding Judge, 366th Judicial District Court; Stephanie 

Duecker Hudson, counsel for appellant; Amy Sue Melo Murphy, assistant criminal 

district attorney; and appellant Addison Douglas Mays, TDCJ No. 02373093, Beto 

Unit, 1391 FM 3328, Tennessee Colony, Texas 75880.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          62,764
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,923,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,500,129
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,018,018
<PP&E>                                         693,958
<DEPRECIATION>                                 328,204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,659,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,853,746
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,010
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,421,495)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,659,074
<SALES>                                     54,111,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,111,056
<CGS>                                       51,897,806
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               51,897,806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,028,012
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             450,465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,258,576)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,258,576)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,186,326)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
**Docket No. F AA**  **- 2013**  **- 1065**
Exhibit 32.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of HepaLife Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harmel Rayat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  HEPALIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date: September 19, 2007By:/s/ Harmel S. RayatHarmel S. Rayat
Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### HILL v. STATE.

No. 24519.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1949.

*881No appearance for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is robbery by assault. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

The record is before us without any bills of exceptions, objections to the court’s charge and without a statement of facts. The indictment appears to be in due and legal form. Consequently, there is nothing presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65893-65894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28151]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of The Secretary


Application Of Kitty Hawk International d/b/a American 
International Airways and Kalitta Air, L.L.C. For Transfer Of 
Certificate Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of order to show cause (Order 2000-10-29) Docket OST-
2000-7588.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 65894]]

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding Kalitta 
Air, L.L.C., fit, willing, and able, and (1) transferring to it the 
all-cargo authority contained in the interstate scheduled certificate 
currently issued to Kitty Hawk International, Inc. d/b/a American 
International Airways, and (2) canceling the passenger authority 
contained in that certificate.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
November 6, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket OST-2000-7588 and addressed to the Department of Transportation 
Dockets (SVC-124.1, Room PL-401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, and should be served 
upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Delores King, Air Carrier Fitness 
Division (X-56, Room 6401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-2343.

    Dated: October 27, 2000.
Susan McDermott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-28151 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As
adopted pursuant to
SECTION 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Audax Credit
BDC Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael P. McGonigle, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1)       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|/s/ Michael P. McGonigle
|------------------------
|Name:                   
|Title:                  



Date: March 16, 2018
EXHIBIT  4.1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Network USA, Inc.

               Incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada
            50,000,000 shares common stock authorized, $.01 par value
           1,000,000 shares preferred stock authorized, $.01 par value

                                                           CUSIP  NO.  640910105

Number                                                                Shares

This  certifies  that:

Is  the  record  holder  of:

     ________ Shares of Network USA, Inc. Common Stock transferable on the books
of  the  Corporation  in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of
this  Certificate  properly  endorsed.  This  Certificate  is  not  valid  until
countersigned  by  the  Transfer  Agent  and  registered  with  the  Registrar.

     Witness  the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures
of  its  duly  officers.

Dated:


/s/Michael  Mead                              /s/Richard  J.  Church
----------------                              ----------------------
Secretary                                     Co-President
                         Corporate  Seal

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


<PAGE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JASPER P. RICHARDSON,

1

Petitioner Below,

Appellant,

v.

DAWN DAVIS-REED,

Respondent Below,

 Appellee.

§

§ No. 259, 2022

§

§ Court Below—Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ File No. CN08-02364

§ Petition No. 21-21545

§ 

§ 

§ 

 Submitted: March 10, 2023

 Decided: May 3, 2023

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the opening brief and the record on appeal, we 

conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Family 

Court’s order dated June 29, 2022. On September 15, 2021, the appellant (“Father”) 

filed a petition in the Family Court seeking modification of the parties’ children’s 

primary residential placement, which had been determined in November 2019 after 

a full hearing on the merits. After a hearing on Father’s petition and a child 

interview, the Family Court determined that Father had not established that 

“continuing enforcement of the prior order may endanger the [children’s] physical 

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
2

health or significantly impair [their] emotional development,” as required for 

modification of an order entered less than two years before the filing of a petition 

for modification.2 Among other things, the court found that Father’s testimony 

lacked credibility; that the appellee had provided appropriate care and nurture to the 

children; and that the appellee had “done nothing that would cause the Court 

concerns for the safety and well-being” of the children. The Family Court

appropriately applied 13 Del. C. § 729(c)(1).

3 A trial court’s factual findings will 

not be disturbed on appeal unless they are clearly erroneous, and when the 

determination of facts turns on a question of the credibility of the witnesses 

appearing before the trial court, we will not substitute our opinion for that of the trier 

of fact.4 To the extent that Father asserts that the Family Court erred in its November 

2019 order, those claims are not properly asserted in this appeal from the Family 

Court’s June 2022 order.

2

See 13 Del. C. § 729(c)(1) (“An order entered by the Court after a full hearing on the merits 

concerning the legal custody of a child or his or her primary residence may be modified only as 

follows: (1) If the application for modification is filed within 2 years after the Court’s most recent 

order concerning these matters, the Court shall not modify its prior order unless it finds, after a 

hearing, that continuing enforcement of the prior order may endanger the child’s physical health 

or significantly impair his or her emotional development.”).

3

See Green v. Green, 2011 WL 1467757 (Del. Apr. 18, 2011) (affirming Family Court’s denial of 

custody modification under 13 Del. C. § 729(c)(1)).

4

Shimel v. Shimel, 2019 WL 2142066, at *2 (Del. May 14, 2019).
3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family 

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE:

EL PASO COUNTY PUBLIC 

DEFENDER,

RELATOR.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00296-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Relator the El Paso 

County Public Defender (the “Public Defender”) against the Honorable Alyssa Perez of the 210th

District Court of El Paso County, Texas, seeking to rescind an order, issued at the request of the 

State and the City of El Paso, quashing a subpoena for certain police training materials that the 

Public Defender contends are material and relevant to its defense. The Public Defender relies 

heavily on the Michael Morton Act, which encourages the parties to discuss and agree with respect 

to discovery. See TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 39.14(n)(“This article does not prohibit the 

parties from agreeing to discovery and documentation requirements equal to or greater than those 

required under this article.”).

In an effort to ascertain the ongoing status of this case, it is ordered that within twenty (20) 
2

days of this order, the Public Defender and the State shall file a status letter informing the Court 

the current status of the litigation with respect to the discovery at issue, as contemplated by the 

Act.

IT IS SOR ORDERED THIS 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
H. Con. Res. 133 Agreed to September 30, 1993

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That a collection of statements made in tribute to the late

Justice Thurgood Marshall, together with related materials, shall

be printed as a House document, with illustrations and suitable

binding. The collection shall be prepared under the direction of

the Joint Committee on Printing.

SEC. 2. In addition to the usual number, there shall be printed

the lesser of—

(1) 50,000 copies (including 1,000 casebound copies) of the

document, of which 33,440 copies (including 440 casebound

copies) shall be for the use of the House of Representatives,

7,600 copies (including 100 casebound copies) shall be for the

use of the Senate, and 8,960 copies (including 460 casebound

copies) shall be for the use of the Joint Committee on Printing;

or

(2) such number of copies of the document as does not

exceed a total production and printing cost of $66,988, with

distribution to be allocated in the same proportion as described

in paragraph (1), except that in no case shall the number

of casebound copies be less than one per Member of Congress.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

18:37 Oct 04, 1993 VerDate 01-JUL-93 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6655 Sfmt 6501 E:\BILLS\HC133.ENR bend06
EO 12866 CMAS Reconsideration Final rule

Penny Lassiter to: Cortney_Higgins 12/10/2012 03:17 PM

Cc: Nick Parsons, Paul Versace, JohnB Chamberlin

Cortney,

Please find attached a clean final version of the final reconsideration package for the Chemical Manufacturing Area 

Source (CMAS) rule.

EO12866_CMAS Recon 2060-AQ89Final_20121210 Clean.doc

I have also included for your convenience a redline/strikeout from the last version that we sent to you on 

November 29, 2012.

EO12866_CMAS Recon 2060-AQ89Final RLSO from 11-29-12 to 12-10-12.docx

Please let me know if you need anything further. Thank you.

Penny Lassiter

Group Leader

Refining and Chemicals Group (D205-01)

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. EPA

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541-5396
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, James Early, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016of Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc.;
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: | April 28, 2017 | /s/ James Early              
|----- | -------------- | -----------------------------
|      |                | Chief Financial Officer      
|      |                | (Principal Financial Officer)