alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 190 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 190

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for the sine die adjournment of the first session of the One 
                        Hundred Third Congress.






103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 190

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Monday, November 
22, 1993, or the legislative day of Tuesday, November 23, 1993, 
pursuant to a motion by the majority leader, or his designee, in 
accordance with this resolution, it stand adjourned sine die, and that 
when the Senate adjourns on any day beginning on Monday, November 22, 
1993 through 11:55 a.m. on Monday, January 3, 1994, pursuant to a 
motion made by the majority leader, or his designee, in accordance with 
this resolution, it stand adjourned sine die or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this resolution: Provided, That the Senate may recess or adjourn 
for any period in excess of three days pursuant to a motion made by the 
majority leader, or his designee, for the duration of the first session 
of the One Hundred Third Congress, subject to section 2 of this 
resolution.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the minority leader of 
the House and the minority leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 23 
      (legislative day, November 22), 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
| logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tyron StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2015, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor, CITIBANK N.A., as Certificate Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC27 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from February 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

/s/ Daniel BoberDaniel BoberExecutive Vice PresidentWells Fargo Bank  

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 

MIGUEL ROMERO-ARZATE (1),

Defendant. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case Number: 3:22-CR-00144-M 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

MIGUEL ROMERO-ARZATE (1), by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 

1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment.

After cautioning and examining MIGUEL ROMERO-ARZATE (1) under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned 

in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and that the offense(s) charged is supported 

by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that the 

plea of guilty be accepted, and that MIGUEL ROMERO-ARZATE (1) be adjudged guilty of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) Illegal 

Reentry After Removal from the United States and have sentence imposed accordingly. After being found guilty of the 

offense by the district judge, 

☐ The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody. 

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community 

if released.

☐ The Government does not oppose release.

☐ The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release. 

☐ I find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other 

person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c). 

☐ The Government opposes release.

☐ The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release. 

☐ If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the 

Government.

☐ The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there is a 

substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has 

recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly shown 

under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released. 

Date: August 9, 2022. 

 ______________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its 

service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States 

District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B).

Case 3:22-cr-00144-M Document 23 Filed 08/09/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 40
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

   The undersigned, Bami Bastani, President and Chief Executive Officer of
ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report of
the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 29, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  April 30, 2003
                                           By:  /s/ Bami Bastani
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Bami Bastani
                                                President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained by ANADIGICS, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1 CEO CertificationI, Anthony Nobles, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Sutura, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May22, 2006     /s/ANTHONY NOBLES Anthony Nobles
HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY HORIZON HEALTHCARE
                               OF NEW JERSEY, INC.
                              Three Penn Plaza East
                            Newark, New Jersey 07105


                                 August 9, 2001


CareAdvantage, Inc.
Metropolitan Corporate Plaza
485-C Route 1 South
Iselin, New Jersey  08830

CW Ventures II, L.P.
1041 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10021

                       Re: Satisfaction of Debt Agreement

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is made to the  Satisfaction of Debt Agreement dated as of November 1,
2000 among Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey,  Horizon  Healthcare of
New Jersey, Inc.,  CareAdvantage,  Inc.,  CareAdvantage Health Systems, Inc. and
Contemporary  HealthCare Management,  Inc. (as amended by letter agreement dated
March 26, 2001, the "Agreement").

This letter will confirm our agreement to further amend the Agreement, effective
as of May 31, 2001, by substituting the date September 30, 2001 for the date May
31, 2001 in Section 2.1 of the Agreement.

Except as set forth in the preceding  paragraph,  the Agreement  remains in full
force and effect.




<PAGE>


Please acknowledge your acceptance of and agreement with the foregoing by
signing and returning the enclosed copy of this letter.

                      Very truly yours,

                      HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE
                       SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY


                      By:/s/ Robert J. Pures
                         -------------------------------------
                           Name:  Robert J. Pures
                           Title: Senior Vice President, Chief
                                  Executive Officer and Treasurer

                      HORIZON HEALTHCARE OF
                       NEW JERSEY, INC.


                      By:/s/ William J. Frantel
                         -------------------------------------
                            Name:  William J. Frantel
                            Title: Treasurer

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

CAREADVANTAGE, INC.


By: /s/ Dennis J. Mouras
    ----------------------------------------
      Name:  Dennis J. Mouras
      Title: Chief Executive Officer

CW VENTURES II, L.P.

By:  CW PARTNERS III, L.P., its General Partner


        By:/s/ Barry Weinberg
           -----------------------------------
           Name:  Barry Weinberg
           Title: General Partner
NAICS: 999300 May 2014 data Local Government Labor Category: Formula Managerial Technical Clerical Unloaded Hourly Rate1 = W $39.38 $29.78 $18.29 Benefits Percentage2 Lb = B/W 46.3% 46.3% 46.3% Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $18.24 $13.79 $8.47 Loaded Hourly Rate Wb = W + B = W(1+Lb) $57.62 $43.57 $26.76 Overhead Percentage3 Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50% Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo $28.81 $21.79 $13.38 Fully Loaded Hourly Rate Wf = Wb + OH
 = W + B + OH $86.43 $65.36 $40.14 1. Data Source: BLS http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_999300.htm NAICS 999300 - Local Government

NAICS: 999100 May 2014 data EPA or Federal Government Labor Category: Formula Managerial Technical Clerical Unloaded Hourly Rate 1 = W 56.54 $ 37.15 $ 21.15 $ Benefits Percentage 2 Lb = B/W 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Benefits per hour B = W*Lb

- $

- $

- $ Loaded Hourly Rate Wb = W + B = W(1+Lb) $56.54 $37.15 $21.15 Overhead Percentage 3 Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50% Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo 28.27 $ 18.58 $ 10.58 $ Fully Loaded Hourly Rate Wf = Wb + OH
 = W + B + OH $84.81 $55.73 $31.73 1. Data Source: BLS http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_999100.htm NAICS 999100 - Federal Executive Branch
. 

## 414

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 



### Eonorrblb

+Ano~ &awkinr county Auditor E4ndorson

county Athens,

Taxar

ptoabar 82, 1939, the 

### faatrnhortly 

### ho tollowlry

queeStatuter,1988, fo-; taxa...eha **be**

l! Or **00%0&W** and thr iols 8955, 

### RarlsedClril Statater,1985, proia part, **as** tollowrr

l . .

. prorlded that amy **totof** who 18 rubjoat to pay a poll tu under the lawr 

### of this Stata . . . shallHerrpal4 arid tax **before** offaring to 

### votr **at v**  l lrotion in thh 8tate and holds a foo*lpt 

### rhowl

"52 that aald 

### poll taxwae p&U **befor. tbo**  **i yytof**  tobraary iwdi ~ ma l

l 0 1 

### 4
. # =H=

. Thr 9rer a OM

## 4,15

of thle Artiolm as to oaating ballot8 shall apply at &ll al*otioa*inaluding general, **ipeoial** aad primmy uleotion8.w Your attention 1s oallod to the opinion of Honorable Soott Gaines, **Assistant** Attorney General, rendered Maroh 31, 1931, in responssto the Sollow!ngqmstlont

Vho la a qualltlodvoter 

### la a boa6 eleotion?" The opinion, la part, raada a8 rollmax *In order thut one be antitled to vote in said rleotlon,it would be aeoe88arythat he or she #hall hare paid a poll tax rlor to Tebnuary 18t of the year PII whloh the person **8eekks ’** **to .vote**  aad holda a 9ropar poll tar reodipt lame6 thenror, or ia exempted themfrom . . .- We believe this opinion 18 equally appliaablato the quoatlonyou ask.

No oall your attentionto the oases OS E&ml1

et al v. Pllo ot al, found la I5 S. 8. (2) 899. In thl6 @ILSO, 8o~0 twenty persons presented their 1953 poll.kr,noilptrr and were allowed to vote **by virtue**  thereof, in EJI l lootlon held January 9, 1935. The aourt **u8es** the fellowlag1-r

*The eleatloawu8 held on tam&y 9, 1939, and only pursoaswho ho1.b 1932 poll tax reosipt8were q\uliriedto Vote, tULbs8 they W6X’U Usqpt mm the payment of a poll tu un4er Mom proviaioa of the 1.a~~~ The rule $6 olear in Teur8 that a permon must quaI%- fy beroro Februmy 1st of the year in whlah he or a&a uok8 to votec It foblow that a puaoa who has not paid hla 11 tcu, or has not othemvlae qunlifie4,botore February 1, 939, p"

## 416

Eonoreblo &hay Hawkins, Page S

oanaot 

### rote in an eleotlonto br hell In 

### 3otober, 1939. Your8

### verytruly 

# -@--a

. ATTOIUUU GENER
ORDER – PAGE 1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

AMERICAN PEARL GROUP LLC, et 

al., 

§ 

§ 

 § 

 Plaintiffs, § 

 § 

v. § Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-00693-N 

 § 

NATIONAL PAYMENT SYSTEMS 

LLC, et al., 

§ 

§ 

 § 

 Defendants. § 

ORDER REQUIRING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

 Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of this Court, 

and the Civil Justice Expense and Delay Reduction Plan for the Northern District of 

Texas, the Court issues this Order to facilitate early consideration of settlement and entry 

of a scheduling order under Rule 16(b). 

 1. The parties are directed to confer within 14 days of the date of this Order 

regarding the following matters, and report to the Court within 14 days after the 

conference the parties’ position: 

 a. a brief statement of the nature of the case and the contentions of the parties; 

 b. the status of settlement discussions (excluding any discussion of amounts); 

 c. possible joinder of additional parties; 

Case 3:22-cv-00693-N Document 13 Filed 05/02/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 245
ORDER – PAGE 2 

 d. any anticipated challenges to jurisdiction or venue; 

 e. date by which the case will be ready for trial and estimated length of trial; 

 f. the desirability of ADR, and the timing for ADR; and 

 g. any objections to disclosure under Rule 26(a)(1). 

 2. The parties are directed to hold the conference required by Rule 26(f) 

within 14 days of the date of this Order and report to the Court as required by that Rule. 

 3. The parties’ Rule 26(f) report does not need to include suggested discovery 

deadlines. The Court’s scheduling order will include default scheduling deadlines. The 

scheduling order provides that the parties are free to alter those deadlines by written 

agreement, to conform to any agreed discovery plan under Rule 26(f) or otherwise, 

without the necessity of motion or order. 

 4. The reports required by paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Order should be 

contained in a single document. Upon receipt of that report, the Court will enter a 

scheduling order without the necessity of a scheduling conference with the Court, unless 

otherwise ordered. Requests for extension of the deadlines contained in this Order are 

unlikely to be granted due to the time constraints of Rule 16(b). 

Signed May 2, 2022. 

David C. Godbey 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:22-cv-00693-N Document 13 Filed 05/02/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 246
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

ROBERT ZIEGE 

Respondent. 

Docket No. FAA-2009-0182 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

FAA Case No. 2009S0700030 

WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

The Complainant, by and through the undersigned attorney, pursuant to Section 13.215 of the 

Board's Rules of Practice [14 CFR 13.215] withdraws the Complaint in the above-referenced 

matter. 

As a result, the Complainant respectfully requests that its Complaint be withdrawn and this 

matter closed. 

Respectfully submitted this ~ day of February, 2015. 

~ Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

_' u 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the Withdrawal of Complaint has been sent via facsimile and Federal 

Express to: 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan 

DOT, Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room E12-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

(FAX) (202) 366-7536 

and via Federal Express to: 

Robert Ziege 

4140 Clemmons Rd., Suite 370 

Clemmons, NC 27012 

Atlanta, GA 30339-5948 

and the original and one copy via Federal Express to: 

Hearing Docket 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

\OmvrtoJ 

DONNA STANLEY ~11!0&1 Legal Assistant 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

FEB 2 6 2015 

Dated
#### Herman Lee ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 24630.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 6, 1951.

ORDER

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The judgment of conviction was affirmed by the Court of Criminal Appeals on June 7, 1950, and appellant’s motion for rehearing was overruled October 25, 1950, 233 S.W.2d 126, and mandate issued.

Thereafter, appellant made application to the Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of certiorari which was granted, 340 U.S. 946, 71 S.Ct. 529, and on April 30, 1951, 341 U.S. 918, 71 S.Ct. 742, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas and remanded said cause for further proceedings not inconsistent with said order of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Therefore, in compliance with said order this cause is now remanded to the District Court of Galveston County, 56th Judicial District, for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SkillSoft Public Limited
Company (the "Company") for the period ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Charles E. Moran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: September 9, 2004

                                               /s/ Charles E. Moran
                                               --------------------
                                               Charles E. Moran
                                               Chief Executive Officer