alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed May 20, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00223-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF D.C., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-05172J

ORDER

On May 13, 2014, this court abated this appeal at the request of both 

appellant’s counsel and the attorney for the child for the appointment of counsel to 

represent appellant on appeal. Despite counsel’s representation to this court that 

appellant is indigent, this court has been informed that appellant has not filed an 

affidavit of indigence and she has not been determined to be indigent and entitled 

to appointed counsel. Accordingly, we WITHDRAW this court’s May 13, 2104 

abatement order. 

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3608 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3608

  To amend the Act of October 19, 1973, concerning taxable income to 
  members of the Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2013

  Mr. Nolan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on 
   Ways and Means and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Act of October 19, 1973, concerning taxable income to 
  members of the Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Grand Portage Band Per Capita 
Adjustment Act''.

SEC. 2. EQUAL TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PER CAPITA INCOME FOR PURPOSES OF 
              FEDERAL ASSISTANCE.

    Paragraph (4) of section 7 of the Act of October 19, 1973 (25 
U.S.C. 1407(4)) is amended by striking ``pursuant to the agreements of 
such Band'' and inserting ``or the Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior 
Chippewa Indians, or both, pursuant to the agreements of each Band''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Duraswitch
Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert J. Brilon, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and
belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the
Company. /s/ Robert J. Brilon
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
March 26, 2004
#### Ex parte DAVIS.

No. 22973.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 18, 1944.

John Davenport, of Wichita Falls, and Rubin Loftin, of Graham, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

This case comes before us in the nature of an appeal from a writ granted by the district court of Clay County in which that court reduced the amount of bond demanded of appellant under a charge of murder from $10,000, fixed by a justice of the peace, to the sum of $7,500. With this amount, so demanded, relator was dissatisfied, and prosecutes this appeal.

Relator seems to be properly presented under an indictment charging the unlawful killing of W. A. Landrum with his malice.

The statement of facts herein, other than that which consists of the indictment and answer of the sheriff, is wholly in a question and answer form and, as such, cannot be considered by us. See Hill v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 433, 55 S.W.2d 835; Turman v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 69, 60 S.W. 2d 231; Henry v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 435, 111 S.W.2d 722.

In an absence of such statement of facts, there is nothing presented to show the excessiveness of bail demanded herein by relator, nor any inability to give the amount of bail fixed by the trial court.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<CIK>                                  0000937598
<NAME>                                 Periphonics Corporation
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      May-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         Jun-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           Nov-30-1996
<CASH>                                       16,479
<SECURITIES>                                  5,313
<RECEIVABLES>                                33,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (890)
<INVENTORY>                                  12,150
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             68,767
<PP&E>                                       26,950
<DEPRECIATION>                             (14,175)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               81,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        17,365
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        136
<OTHER-SE>                                   64,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 81,825
<SALES>                                      51,942
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             51,942
<CGS>                                        25,880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                25,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             18,314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               8,777
<INCOME-TAX>                                  3,423
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           5,354
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  5,354
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.11


    Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Belo Horizonte, June 30, 2003

Securities and  Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:


The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Jose Salim Mattar Junior, the
Chief Executive Officer, and Roberto Antonio Mendes, the Chief Financial
Officer of Prime Prestadora de Servicos S.A., each certifies that, to the best
of their respective knowledge:

1.   the Annual Report on Form 20-F (the "Report") fully complies with the
     requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934; and
2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Prime
     Prestadora de Servicos S.A.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Prime Prestadora de
Servicos S.A. and will be retained by Prime Prestadora de Servicos S.A. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       /s/ Jose Salim Mattar Junior
                                       ----------------------------
                                       Name: Jose Salim Mattar Junior
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer/President


                                       /s/ Roberto Antonio Mendes
                                       --------------------------
                                       Name: Roberto Antonio Mendes
                                       Title: Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
         
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            483,960
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          3,831,121
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                        0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                        0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    16,038,351
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                    0
<LOANS>                                        61,229,636
<ALLOWANCE>                                       235,814
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 85,801,237
<DEPOSITS>                                     61,741,234
<SHORT-TERM>                                    5,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             2,349,134
<LONG-TERM>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        7,562,762
<OTHER-SE>                                      8,648,107
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 85,801,237
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 3,729,466
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 698,624
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  166,492
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                4,594,582
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              2,123,531
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,294,246
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           2,300,336
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      17,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (50,620)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   961,541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,385,860
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        871,660
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      871,660
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .69
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       3.98
<LOANS-NON>                                           318
<LOANS-PAST>                                          318
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                        0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  235,970
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                          18
<RECOVERIES>                                            1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 235,814
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           235,814
        


</TABLE>
Case 3:22-cr-00146-L Document 116 Filed 05/23/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 302
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28721]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Health Professions Accessions Forms; 
AETC Forms 1402, 1437; OMB Number 0701-0078.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 3,600.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 3,600.
    Average Burden per Response: 1 hour.
    Annual Burden Hours: 3,600.
    Needs and Uses: Respondents are civilian candidates applying for a 
commission in the U.S. Air Force as health care officers. These forms 
provide pertinent information to facilitate selection of candidates for 
a commission.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to Obtain or Retain Benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Officer of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: November 3, 2000.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-28721 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
Case 3:22-cv-00480-S-BH Document 19 Filed 05/12/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 137
Case 3:22-cv-00480-S-BH Document 19 Filed 05/12/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 138
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AMARILLO DIVISION 

The STATE OF TEXAS, et. al., § 

 § 

Plaintiffs, § 

 § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22–cv–00014-M 

 vs. § 

 § 

JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., § 

in his official capacity as § 

President of the United States, et al., § 

 § 

Defendants, § 

 § 

 and § 

 § 

JESUS; ROSA; TIMOTEO; and UZIAS, § 

 § 

Intervenor-Defendants. § 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION 

TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYMS 

Having considered Proposed Intervenor-Defendants’ Motion to Proceed Under 

Pseudonyms, any further briefing, the record, and applicable law, and having determined that 

Proposed Intervenor-Defendants’ privacy interests outweigh the procedural custom of disclosure 

under this Circuit’s case-specific balancing analysis, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court 

hereby ORDERS as follows: 

The Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonyms is GRANTED. 

Proposed Intervenor-Defendants shall be allowed to proceed using pseudonyms. All 

parties shall use Proposed Intervenor-Defendants’ pseudonyms in all documents filed on the public 

docket or served on the parties in this action, and shall be prohibited from using Proposed 

Case 3:22-cv-00780-M Document 20-1 Filed 03/22/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 270
Intervenor-Defendants’ real names in such documents. The names and identities of Proposed 

Intervenor-Defendants, if submitted to the Court, shall be maintained in camera and not made 

available to the public, Plaintiffs, or Defendants. To the extent any document filed with the Court 

contains Proposed Intervenor-Defendants’ real names, the names and any other personally 

identifying information shall be redacted and replaced with applicable pseudonyms. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Signed this day of ________________, 

 BARBARA M. G. LYNN 

 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cv-00780-M Document 20-1 Filed 03/22/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 271
#### LITTLE v. STATE.

No. 21756.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 3, 1941.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal Jan. 28, 1942.

L. D. Johnston, of Waxahachie, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a fine of $100 for the violation of the local option law.

The record contains no notice of appeal; there is no judgment and no sentence, and the caption does not show when the term of court began, for either of which reasons this court has no jurisdiction to consider any matter on appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

A supplemental transcript has been filed, containing a proper caption and showing that notice of appeal was given. The appeal will be reinstated and the case disposed of upon the merits.

The accusation for which appellant was convicted was the possession of liquor in a container to which no stamp was affixed showing the payment of the tax due the State.

Appellant lived with his brother, O. P. Little. When peace officers, with a search warrant directing them to search the premises of O. P. Little, approached the house, appellant was seen running out of the back door. Shortly thereafter, he returned to the house, while the officers were making a search thereof. No liquor was found in the house as a result of the search. However, in a well situated about eight feet from the rear of the house, a quart bottle, partially filled with corn whiskey, was found floating on the surface of the water. The bottle was retrieved from the well. As the officers started to arrest O. P. Little, appellant said to them that the whiskey was his and for them not to arrest O. P. Little, his brother. The bottle of com whiskey was in a contain*309er which did not evidence the payment the tax due thereon. of

Appellant, testifying as a witness in bis own behalf, denied possession or ownership of, or previous connection with, the whiskey. He denied having made the statement to the officers that the whiskey belonged to him. Appellant’s admission as also his res gestae statement to the officers that the whiskey was his was sufficient to show his possession thereof and to authorize his conviction.

The bills of exception accompanying this record relate only to the sufficiency of the evidence.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M A Y R A C A R O L I N A G A R C I A , a ka S ab r in aM ic h e lle G a r c ia ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70729 A ge nc yN os . A 098- 953- 391

A 098- 953- 392 A 098- 953- 393 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r d o f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r14, 2010 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E an dT H O M A S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P et i t i on erM ay raC ar ol i na G ar ci a and her daugh t er s, V i vi an M ar ce l a R i vera Ga r c i aa n d Ka th e r i n e Va n e s s aRo d r i g u e z Ga r c i a , n a t i v e s a n dc i t i z e n s o f El S a l va dor, pe t i t i on f

orr e vi e w of

aB oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s or de rdi s m i s s i ng the i rappe a l f

r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( I J ) de c i s i on de ny i ng the i rappl i c a t i on f or 

# FI LED DE C 22 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2 09- 70729

asyl u m , w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al an dp ro t ect i o n u n d er th e C o n v en t i o n A g ai n st T ortur e ( C A T ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e de nythe pe t i t i on f o rr e v i e w. P et i t i o n ers co n t en d th e B o ard d en i ed th em d u e p ro cess b y fai l i n g t o ad d ress ac o u n tryr e p o rt s u p p o rtin g th e irc la im th a t w o m e n a n dc h ild r e n a r e m is tr e a te din E l S al vado r. T here i s no cl ear e vi dence t o rebutthe pres um pt i on thatthe B oard c o n s id e r e d th e e v id e n c e in th e r e c o r d . See Koh l iv. G on zales , 473 F . 3d 1061, 1068 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 7 ). R eg ard l ess, th e B o ard d en i ed rel i ef b ased o n a fai l u re t o est ab l i sh a nexus t o a prot ec t ed grou nd , and the coun tryre po rti s notre l evantt o that de t e rm i na t i on. W e de c l i ne t o a ddr e s s pe t i t i one r ’ s une xhaus t e d c ont e nt i on tha tthe I Jdi d not c om pl yw i th 8 C . F . R . § 1208. 11 byf a i l i ng t o s e nd ac opyof

the a s y l um appl i c a t i on to th e D e p a rtm e n t o f

S ta te f o rr e v ie w . O n t i v e r o s -Lo p ezv . I NS , 213 F . 3d 1121, 1 1 2 4 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 0 ) (d ecl i n i n g t o co n si d er a cl ai m th atB o ard d i dn o th av e fi rst op po rtun i ty t o con si der) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 24447.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 26, 1949.

None on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Upon his plea of guilty appellant was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor in dry area in Travis County, Texas, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

Notwithstanding his plea of guilty appellant perfected an appeal to this court. We find the record before us with no statement of facts and no bills of exception. No question is presented for review, and the judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRAY JIBRIL MURRAY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 425 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-52814) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Plan and the
2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Catalytica Energy Systems, Inc. of our
reports dated, October 17, 1999, except for the second paragraph of Note 4 as to
which is August 28, 2000 and October 26, 1998 relating to the financial
statements of GENXON Power Systems, L.L.C.

                                       /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP

San Jose, CA
March 15, 2001