alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### METCALF v. STATE.

No. 25629.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 9, 1952.

Bert Ashby, Dallas, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*819MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, four years.

No statement of facts accompanies the record.

Bill of exception No. 1 is to the admission of testimony. There is no showing in the bill as to what the testimony complained of was. The bill does not show that any objectionable testimony was admitted and, therefore, presents nothing for review. 13A Texas Digest Criminal Law «=>1120(4).

Bill of exception No. 2 seeks to attack the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. We cannot pass upon such a bill without a statement of facts.

What we have said in discussing bill of exception No. 2 applies to bill of exception No. 3, wherein appellant complains of absence of corroboration of the accomplice’s testimony.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### SCOTT v. STATE.

No. 24980.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 15, 1950.

No attorney for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction was for burglary, punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty, waiving a jury by written permission of the district attorney and the court, and on his plea of guilty punishment was assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary. Upon sentence being pronounced, appellant excepted and gave notice of appeal to this court. There is no statement of facts or bills of exception in the record. The proceedings all appear regular. Nothing is presented for review, and the judgment is affirmed. ' ■
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The data schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation's Balance Sheet at June 30,
1999, and from its Statement of Income for the six months ended June 30,
1999.  The information presented is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          21,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  418,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,644
<INVENTORY>                                    188,228
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               676,542
<PP&E>                                         406,948
<DEPRECIATION>                                 166,043
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,447,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          543,438
<BONDS>                                        280,530
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           658
<OTHER-SE>                                     591,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,447,218
<SALES>                                      1,649,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,649,948
<CGS>                                        1,217,681
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,217,681
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               357,180
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,248
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 63,638
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,870
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,768
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,768
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56


</TABLE>
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 The
          undersigned, Thomas C. Shields, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
          Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Quarterly
          Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2007
          fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report
          fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
          of
          operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
          November 8, 2007
 By:
                /s/
                    Thomas C. ShieldsThomas
                    C. ShieldsExecutive
                    Vice President and
                    Chief Financial Officer
 
  This
          certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated
          by
          reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act
          of
          1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
          by reference.
 
 A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
          authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
          appears
          in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
          by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained
          by
          ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
          or its
          staff upon request.
### FIRST COURT OF APPBJ&Sj t^ 

## 301 FanninStreet"*-•"-*: Houston, Texas 7J^2'^p^xrm

RE: Case No. 

## oiQ^ffithelS Style: David Jones v. Tiffany Montejo

### FI4 11 

### U.S.POSTAGE» PITNEYBOWES

5/l0 ZIP77002 < 

### 02 1W ' 0001372104FEB 26 2015 

### The time for filing the APPELLANT'S brief has expired. As of this date, neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has been filed by the appellant. 

### If you intend to file a brief in this case, within 10 days of the date of this notice you must file a motion requesting an extension of time along with your brief or a motion to extend time to file a brief. 

### This appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution unless (1) appellant files a motion to extend time that states the facts relied on to reasonably explain 

### appellant's failure to timely file its brief and (2) the appellee is not 

### significantly injured by appellant's failure to timely file appellant's brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b)(1), 38.6(d), 38.8 (a) (1),42. Please notify the Court within 10 days if you do not intend to file a brief.
T. C. Case # 1997-17289



### NIXIE Christopher A. Prine, UTF Clerk of the <tourt Tiffany Montejo 1515 Rudel Dr. Apt* 401 Tomball, TX 77375 787

i- i. v i ii.Tti uK'i *= 

## _RE_TU_RN TO SENDER'
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Secured Digital  Applications,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly  period ending  September 30,
2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Chee Hong Leong, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Chee Hong Leong
-------------------
Chee Hong Leong
Chief Financial Officer
November 11, 2005
United States Steel Corporation – Minntac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request

April 24, 2012

Item 14

For the period from January 1,2002, to the date of receipt of this letter, provide NOX

emissions data from each indurating furnace for each day, and also for a thirty-day

rolling average.

Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or 

were consulted in the preparation of the response: Teresa Simetkosky

Answer:

Lines 3-5

The initial NOx RATA test was performed in January/February 2007.

The initial SO2 RATA test was performed in July 2008. 

Lines 6-7

The initial NOx RATA test was performed in June 2005. However, daily data was only 

able to be collected from September 8, 2005 to current.

The initial SO2 RATA test was performed in July 2008.

As per the conference call between USEPA and U. S. Steel on April 12, 2012, the 30 day

rolling average is provided from 10/1/2007 to current. The 4

th quarter 2007 is when the 30 

day rolling average was initially instituted as it was required by the Administrative Order by 

Consent (AOC) with MPCA and submitted in the quarterly BART report submitted to the 

MPCA per the AOC.
Exhibit 31.1 Certification I, Andrew S. Prince, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Precision Aerospace Components, Inc. (the Company);2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.As the Companys sole certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.As the Companys sole certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.  /s/ Andrew S. PrinceAndrew S. PrincePresident and Chief Executive Officer Date: May 9, 2008
**EXHIBIT8**

List of PrincipalSubsidiaries

Of

Gruma, S.A.B. deC.V.
| **Subsidiary**                                                                | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                                                          |       |                              |
| Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A.B. de C.V. (“GIMSA”)                   |       | Mexico                            |
|                                                                          |       |                              |
| Molinera de México, S.A. de C.V. (“Molinera de   México”) |       | Mexico                            |
|                                                                          |       |                              |
| Productos y Distribuidora Azteca, S.A. de C.V.   (“PRODISA”)        |       | Mexico                            |
|                                                                          |       |                              |
| Gruma Corporation                                                             |       | Nevada, United  States            |
|                                                                          |       |                              |
| Azteca Milling LP                                                             |       | Texas, United  States             |
|                                                                          |       |                              |
| Gruma Centroamérica, LLC                                                 |       | Nevada, United  States            |
|                                                                          |       |                              |
| Molinos Nacionales, C.A. (“MONACA”)                                 |       | Venezuela                         |
|                                                                          |       |                              |
| Derivados de Maíz Seleccionado, C.A.  (“DEMASECA”)             |       | Venezuela                         |
|                                                                          |       |                              |
| Investigación de Tecnología Avanzada, S.A. de C.V.                  |       | Mexico                            |

 

----
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 23

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the Architect of the Capitol to transfer the

catafalque to the Supreme Court for a funeral service.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol is author3 ized and directed to transfer to the custody of the Chief

4 Justice of the United States the catafalque which is pres5 ently situated in the crypt beneath the rotunda of the Cap6 itol so that the said catafalque may be used in the Su7 preme Court Building in connection with services to be

8 conducted there for the late Honorable Thurgood Mar-
2

HCON 23 RDS

1 shall, former Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of

2 the United States.

Passed the House of Representatives January 26,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
I N THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 1 8 - 06 21 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. JAY DONALD WITKOWSKI ,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 29 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brie f on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 17 2020

04/17/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0621
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multi-Media Tutorial Services,
Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Barry Reichman, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


Date: July 23, 2007                       /s/ BARRY REICHMAN
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Barry Reichman

                                          Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                          Financial Officer of Multi-Media
                                          Tutorial Services, Inc.
                                          (Principal Executive and Accounting
                                          Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

YOEL WEISSHAUS, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-cv-494

 §

STEVE COY TEICHELMAN, and §

100th JUDICIAL DISTRICT, §

 §

Defendants. §

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

Plaintiff certifies that all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, 

guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent corporations or other legal entities who are 

corporations which have a financial interest in the outcome of this case are listed below.

1. Yoel Weisshaus

2. Steve Coy Teichelman

3. 100th Judicial District

4. Scott H. Palmer, P.C.

5. Scott H. Palmer

6. James P. Roberts

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Scott H. Palmer

SCOTT H. PALMER,

Texas Bar No. 00797196

/s/ James P. Roberts

JAMES P. ROBERTS,

Texas Bar No. 24105721

SCOTT H. PALMER, P.C.

15455 Dallas Parkway, Suite 540

Addison, Texas 75001

Telephone: 214.987.4100

Facsimile: 214.922.9900

scott@scottpalmerlaw.com

james@scottpalmerlaw.com

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 3:22-cv-00494-M Document 2 Filed 03/02/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 42
EXHIBIT 32.1 TO 10-QSB
-----------------------
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of Prologic Management Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James M. Heim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to
the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company for the periods presented.



                                               /s/ James M. Heim
                                               --------------------------------
                                               James M. Heim
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Prologic Management Systems, Inc.
                                               November 14, 2005
FOHP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
           (SUCCESSOR TO FIRST OPTION HEALTH PLAN OF NEW JERSEY, INC.)
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Six Months Ended
                                                               June 30,
                                                       1997               1996
                                                   ------------       ------------
<S>                                                <C>               <C>

Net Income (Loss)                                  $(20,637,085)      $(10,756,223)
                                                   ============       ============


Weighted average number of common shares:
  Shares outstanding at 2/28/97                       2,100,173
  Shares outstanding at 4/30/97                       2,086,839
  Shares outstanding at 6/30/97                       2,254,948
  Shares outstanding six months ended 6/30/96                            2,100,173

Weighted average shares outstanding                   2,147,320          2,100,173
                                                   ============       ============


Net (loss) per common share                        $      (9.61)      $      (5.12)
                                                   ============       ============
</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3609 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3260 Broad Street in Port Henry, New York, as the ‘‘Dain Taylor 

Venne Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2013 

Mr. OWENS (for himself, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. KING of New York, 

Mr. ISRAEL, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. MEEKS, Ms. MENG, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. CLARKE, Mr. NADLER, Mr. GRIMM, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. 

CROWLEY, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of 

New York, Mr. GIBSON, Mr. TONKO, Mr. HANNA, Mr. REED, Mr. MAFFEI, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. COLLINS of New York, and 

Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3260 Broad Street in Port Henry, New York, 

as the ‘‘Dain Taylor Venne Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DAIN TAYLOR VENNE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 3260 Broad Street in Port 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3609 IH

1 Henry, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Dain Taylor Venne Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dain Taylor Venne 

7 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS