alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Airspace Docket No. 2000-ASW-15]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

This notice confirms the effective date of a direct final rule which revises the Class E Airspace at Tulsa, OK.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

The direct final rule published at 65 FR 54952 is effective 0901 UTC, November 30, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, Fort Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 817-222-5593.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 12, 2000, (65 FR 54952). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on November 30, 2000. No adverse comments were received, and, thus, this action confirms that this direct final rule will be effective on that date.                

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on October 27, 2000.

Robert N. Stevens,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.

[FR Doc. 00-28293 Filed 11-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 10.37

EMPLOYMENT, NONDISCLOSURE AND  NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT

THIS EMPLOYMENT, NONDISCLOSURE AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made as of the 6th day of September, 2001, by and between Acupac
Packaging, Inc. (the "Company"), and Craig Berry, whose address is 2 Taylor Lane, Westport, Connecticut 06880 ("Employee").

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Company is engaged in the business of providing contract manufacturing and packaging services for certain cosmetic, skin care, and pharmaceutical
products, and has need for an executive with experience in said business;

WHEREAS,
in connection with the transactions contemplated by that certain Asset Purchase Agreement, dated of even date herewith, by and among the Company, Dermal Sciences, Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("Dermal"), Employee, and Employee's spouse (the "Asset Purchase Agreement"), the Company has acquired substantially all of the assets of Dermal (the "Acquisition");

WHEREAS,
following the Acquisition, the Company will operate the business and assets it acquires from Dermal as a separate division of the Company (the "Division");

WHEREAS,
Employee is experienced in the business of providing manufacturing and packaging services for with respect to certain cosmetic and pharmaceutical patches, and other related
services, and has experience in the management of such business, and prior to the Acquisition served as President of Dermal;

WHEREAS,
the Company desires to employ Employee an executive capacity upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement; and

WHEREAS,
Employee is willing to enter into this Agreement with respect to his employment with the Company upon the terms and conditions set forth herein;

NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the promises contained in this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound, the parties agree as follows:

Section 1.TERM



Section 2.DUTIES



---



Section 3.COMPENSATION



2

---



3

---



Section 4.TERMINATION



4

---



Section 5.RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS

The
following restrictive covenants shall apply to this Agreement:



5

---



6

---



Section 6.MISCELLANEOUS



7

---



[SIGNATURE
PAGE FOLLOWS]

8

---

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written.

| |  | "Employee"                
| |  | --------------------------
| |  | /s/ Craig BerryCraig Berry
| |  | "Company"                 
| |  | ACUPAC PACKAGING, INC.    
| |  | By:                       

9

---

QuickLinks
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference
is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special
Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,as
Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodianand WILMINGTON
TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS1 (the "Agreement").
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement,
I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through
December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.





Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 
Wells Fargo Bank
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         4327000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1494000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     240000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        18292000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          18230000
<LOANS>                                       32024000
<ALLOWANCE>                                      42000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                58089000
<DEPOSITS>                                    42637000
<SHORT-TERM>                                   2192000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             686000
<LONG-TERM>                                    1000000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          9000
<OTHER-SE>                                    11565000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                58089000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                1153000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               624000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                139000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               1916000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              953000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1020000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           896000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     1000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               37000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 667000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 359000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      249000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    249000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.17
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     33000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 41000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     1000
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                42000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             42000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 170 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 170

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 10 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

      Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Directing the President pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers 
     Resolution to remove United States Armed Forces from Somalia.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES FROM SOMALIA.

    Pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 
1544(c)), the Congress hereby directs the President to remove United 
States Armed Forces from Somalia by March 31, 1994 (unless the 
President requests and the Congress authorizes a later date), except 
for a limited number of members of the Armed Forces sufficient only to 
protect United States diplomatic facilities and citizens, and 
noncombatant personnel to advise the United Nations commander in 
Somalia.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 9, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 72-6452.

#### Morris *v.*Sparrow et al.

Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT
      32.2








STATEMENT
      OF EDWARD W. WILHELM,


SENIOR
      VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF BORDERS GROUP, INC.


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Edward
      W. Wilhelm, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 23, 2005,
      of
      Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
      that
      the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Borders
      Group, Inc.





Date:
      August 26, 2005





/s/
      EDWARD W. WILHELM


Edward
      W.
      Wilhelm


Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Borders
      Group, Inc.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Borders Group, Inc. and will be retained by Borders Group, Inc. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1998, Statement of Operations and
Statement of Cash Flows for the period ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1000

       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             131
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,433
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,894
<INVENTORY>                                    109,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               204,143
<PP&E>                                          50,307
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 539,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          145,216
<BONDS>                                        132,055
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     97,164
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,241
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   539,606
<SALES>                                         62,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,050
<CGS>                                           21,933
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,708
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   540
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,392)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,261
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,131)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,131)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
         


</TABLE>
#### MONTGOMERY v. STATE.

No. 25621.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 9, 1952.

E. O. Northcutt, Amarillo, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is robbery with firearms; the punishment, five years.

Three State witnesses, who were all of the persons present at the filling station on the night in question, testified that appellant, by the use of a shot gun, forced the owner of the station to take the money from his till and place it on the seat of appellant’s car waiting outside and in which appellant then drove away.

Appellant and his witnesses testified to • an alibi, which was not accepted by the jury.

We hold the evidence to be sufficient to support the verdict and, therefore, conclude that the trial court did not err in failing to. instruct a verdict of not guilty.

Bill of exception No. 2 complains that the court failed to give a requested charge on the identity of the accused growing out of his defense of alibi. We find that in paragraph 7 of the court’s charge he amply charged the jury that they must believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant was the identical person who committed the offense before they could convict.

Bill of exception No. 3 complains of that portion of the court’s charge in which he defined “assault” and “assault and battery”.

The court, in that portion of his charge where he defined terms, gave the definition of the terms “assault” and “assault and battery” found in Article 1138, Penal Code. In addition thereto, the court instructed the jury, “The term ‘assault and battery’ is used herein in the same sense as ‘Battery’. That is, the term ‘assault and battery’ is *synonimous*with the term ‘battery’.” >We do not quote this as a model charge, but we do not feel that it was in anywise injurious to appellant. We cannot agree that this placed a greater burden upon him.

*815It must be borne in mind that appellant was here charged with robbery by assault. The court properly defined “assault”. When the court came to apply the law to the facts, he charged the jury that they must find that appellant *made an assault*upon the injured party and that, by means of said assault or violence or placing in fear, -he took from the person of the injured party the money in question, which was a proper application of the law to the facts of the case. Therefore, the charge as a whole properly submitted the case to the jury.

Bill of exception No. 4 complains that, in replying to the following written communication from the jury: “If the verdict be guilty, can the sentence be lessened by the mercy of the court?” the trial court answered in writing: “the Court instructs you that in arriving at your verdict you will consider the evidence before you and the Courts’ charge heretofore submitted to you, and no other matter are to be considered by you, and when you have reached a verdict the judgment of the court will be in accordance with such verdict.” We find no error therein.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Attachment - CAS Number 1014979-92-0 Known Composition

Common Name CAS Registry Name CAS NumberComponent 1 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 2 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 3 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 4 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 5 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 6 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 7 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 8 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 9 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 10 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 11 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 12 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 13 Trade Secret Trade SecretWater Water 7732-18-5Others Please See BelowCurrent State of Knowledge on the composition of "others"Common Name CAS Registry Name or Structure CAS Number or other information

Component 14 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 15 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 16 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 17 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 18 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 19 Trade Secret Trade SecretComponent 20 Trade SecretUnknowns Various Combinations of most of the above Materials
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.2(a)

                               TERMINATION NOTICE

                                                                November 8, 1999

TO: Genesis Residential Healthcare, Inc.
    3200 Bristol Street, 8th Floor
    Costa Mesa, CA 92626
    Attention: William Ashby

Dear Sir:

     Per your request and pursuant to the terms in section sic 1(b) of the
Limited Partnership Agreement dated July 1, 1999 the undersigned hereby gives
notice that the undersigned resigns and terminates its participation in the
Genesis Residential Healthcare Community-Perris, LTD., LP, "The Partnership",
effective upon the acceptance thereof and execution of a mutual release of all
claims.  Note, that at the current time there are no limited partners so the
need for a majority vote by them is not required.

     You should immediately commence to appoint another General Partner as a
replacement as provided in the Agreement and the laws of the State of
California.  Please feel free to contact me should my assistance be required.

     e-Net has prepared it's resignation as General Partner and an Assignment of
Interest in the General Partnership to you to be effective upon the execution of
the aforesaid Mutual release of Claims.

     By your signature you agree to hold e-Net financial harmless from all
present and future liabilities stemming from our relationship to date.


                                             Very truly yours,


e-Net Financial Corporation



By /s/ Michael P. Roth
   -----------------------
   Michael P. Roth President


Genesis Residential Healthcare, Inc.


By: /s/ William W. Ashby
    ----------------------
    William W. Ashby
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 152 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 152

           Concerning human rights and democracy in Vietnam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 23, 1993

 Mr. Skaggs (for himself, Mr. Peterson of Florida, and Mr. Gilchrest) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
           Concerning human rights and democracy in Vietnam.

Whereas the ending of the Cold War provides an unprecedented opportunity for 
        democratic reform and improvements in human rights throughout the world;
Whereas the government and citizens of the United States view positively recent 
        improvements in resolving POW/MIA cases by the Socialist Republic of 
        Vietnam and wish to promote even greater openness in that country;
Whereas recent economic reforms and initiatives undertaken by the Vietnamese 
        Government can best be encouraged and built upon through political 
        liberalization;
Whereas the interests of the United States and the people of Vietnam, and the 
        international community would best be served by having a friendly and 
        democratic government in Vietnam;
Whereas the United States currently has no program to support political reform 
        in Vietnam; and
Whereas greater respect for internationally recognized human rights and a 
        peaceful transition to democracy in Vietnam would greatly reduce the 
        threat to the stability of Southeast Asia, allow for the rapid 
        resolution of the POW/MIA issue, and enable the creation of a free-
        market economy in Vietnam: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the United States should support the process of 
        nonviolent democratic reform in Vietnam;
            (2) the Secretary of State should declare United States 
        support for the democratization of Vietnam and reaffirm that 
        measurable progress on the MIA/POW issue is critical to 
        normalizing economic and diplomatic relations with the United 
        States;
            (3) the Administration should take the lead in mobilizing 
        the United Nations, ASEAN members, human rights organizations, 
        and the various other interest groups to work toward the common 
        goal of promoting basic human rights, the rule of law, and free 
        and democratic elections in Vietnam; and
            (4) the United States should increase its support for Voice 
        of America programming in Vietnam.

                                 <all>
```