alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Scott, Appellant, *v.*Wilson.

Argued Oct. 21, 1915.

Appeal, No. 84, Oct. T., 1915, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1915, No. 1038, for plaintiff on demurrer to plaintiff’s statement of claim in case of Alexander B. Scott v. John B. Wilson, John H. Porter, Herman Bruder, Donald Clark, Thomas Wallace and Joseph B. Dilks.

Before Mestrezat, Potter, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ.

Affirmed.

The facts appear in McDowell v. Wilson, 252 Pa. 91.

*Frederic O. Grote,*with him *Hermann L. Grote,*for appellant.

*Robert Woods Sutton,*with him *Watson & Freeman,*for appellees.

January 3, 1916:

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Potter,

As the questions raised in this appeal are identical *96with those considered in the appeal at No. 83, October Term, 1915, they have been disposed of, in the opinion which has just been filed in that case. For the reasons there stated, the assignments of error here are overruled, and the judgment affirmed.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 08101**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 08101\08101_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 08101\08101_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 08101\08101_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 08101\08101_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 08101\08101_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 08101\08101_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 08101\08101_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 08101\Supporting Documentation\08101_Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 08101\Supporting Documentation\08101_Site Maps.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 08101\Supporting Documentation\08101_Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- ) ) Eastern Construction & Electric, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. W912DS-13-C-0056 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 60882, 60883

Steven A. Berkowitz, Esq. Ira E. Dorfman, Esq.

Berkowitz 

### & Associates, P.C. Marlton, NJ Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Lorraine C. Lee, Esq. Rita M. Fang, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. Army Engineer District, New York ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: October 16, 2018
DAVID D'ALESSANDRIS Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA Nos. 60882, 60883, Appeals ofEastern Construction 

### & Electric, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
# AGENCY:

 National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 

# ACTION:

 Notice of agency report forms under OMB review. 

# SUMMARY:

 The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). Information collection is required to ensure proper use of and disposition of rights to inventions made in the course of, and data developed under NASA contracts. 

# DATES:

 All comments should be submitted on or before April 10, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

 All comments should be addressed to Mr. Paul A. Boellner, Code Q, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546-0001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Ms. Carmela Simonson, NASA Reports Officer, (202) 358-1223. 

*Title:*                         NASA Safety Reporting System.                     

*OMB Number:*                         2700-0063.                     

*Type of review:*                         Extension.                     

*Need and Uses:*                         NASA employees and contractors can voluntarily and confidentially report to an independent agent, any safety concerns or hazards pertaining to any NASA program or project, which have not been resolved through the normal process.                     

*Affected Public:*                         Federal Government.                     

*Number of Respondents:*                        75.                     

*Responses Per Respondent:*                         1.                     

*Annual Responses:*                         75.                     

*Hours Per Request:*1/4                         hr.                     

*Annual Burden Hours:*                         19 hrs.                     

*Frequency of Report:*                         As needed.                     

David B. Nelson, 

Deputy Chief Information Officer, Office of the Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 00-2868 Filed 2-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG APPEARS HERE]

The Board of Directors
Genesis Microchip Incorporated

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-70469, 333-51001 and 333-81413) on Form S-8 of Genesis Microchip
Incorporated of our report dated July 9, 1999, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Genesis Microchip Incorporated as of March 31, 1999, and May
31, 1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity and cash flows for the ten months ended March 31, 1999 and the two years
ended May 31, 1998, which report appears in the March 31, 1999, annual report on
Form 10-K of Genesis Microchip Incorporated.


                                                       /s/ KPMG LLP




Toronto, Canada
August 25, 1999
Exhibit 99.1(a)
                                                                 ---------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            -------------------------
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                               ------------------
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                             ----------------------
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------


 In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Homeseekers.com,   Inc,  (the
 "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30,  2002 as filed with the
 Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Thomas
 Chaffee,  Chairman  of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,
 certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Company.




 /S/ Thomas Chaffee
 -------------------------
 Thomas Chaffee
 Chairman of the Board and
 Chief Executive Officer
 August 11, 2002
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00250-CV

Style: A-1 Auto Body and Paint Shop, LLC

v. Margaret McQuiggan

Date motion filed*: May 24, 2013

Type of motion: Motion to for involuntary dismissal

Party filing motion: Appellee

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: 

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

The Court orders that appellee’s motion for involuntary dismissal be carried with the case.

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: September 12, 2013
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, the chief financial officer of Dynabazaar, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that
(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
"10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date:    March 30, 2006                                  /s/Melvyn Brunt
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Melvyn Brunt
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 146 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.146
                                      Agreed to October 19, 1993        
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL BUILDING AND GROUNDS.

    The Commission on the Bicentennial of the United States Capitol 
(hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Commission'') may 
use the Capitol building and grounds on October 23, 1993, or on such 
other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
President pro tempore of the Senate may jointly designate, for events to 
commemorate the 200th anniversary of the laying of the cornerstone of 
the Capitol.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    The events referred to in section 1 shall be free of admission 
charge to the public and arranged under conditions to be prescribed by 
the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    (a) Structures and Equipment.--Subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, the Commission is authorized to erect upon the 
Capitol grounds such stages, sound amplification devices, and other 
related structures and equipment as may be required for the events 
referred to in section 1.
    (b) Additional Arrangements.--The Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board are authorized to make any such additional 
arrangements, including the use of voluntary and uncompensated staff and 
services, as may be required to carry out the events referred to in 
section 1.
    (c) Representations.--The Architect of the Capitol shall take such 
actions as may be necessary to ensure that sponsors of the events 
referred to in section 1 do not make representations that such 
sponsorship in any way constitutes an endorsement by the Federal 
Government.
Attest:







                                  Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:







                                                Secretary of the Senate.`
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 35 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 35

                To restore safety to America's schools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2013

  Mr. Stockman (for himself and Mr. Broun of Georgia) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                To restore safety to America's schools.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Schools Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds--
            (1) that the Supreme Court has found language nearly 
        identical to the ``Gun Free School Zones Act'' to be 
        unconstitutional;
            (2) that the enactment of the ``Gun Free School Zones Act'' 
        has been met with an almost uninterrupted series of horrific 
        and tragic shootings at Columbine, Newtown and in other 
        American schools;
            (3) that the ``Gun Free School Zones Act'' has been a 
        deadly failure. According to research by GeorgiaCarry.org, in 
        the 22 years prior to enactment of the ``Gun Free School Zones 
        Act'' there were two school shootings in which four or more 
        people were intentionally murdered in a short period of time, 
        and in the 22 years after the enactment of the ``Gun Free 
        School Zones Act'' there have been 10 such school shootings;
            (4) that American schools had not been plagued with this 
        succession of horrific shootings prior to the enactment of the 
        ``Gun Free School Zones Act'';
            (5) that horrific massacres on school campuses in Pearl, 
        Mississippi, and southwestern Virginia, were averted by armed 
        staff and students;
            (6) that none of the murderers in any of these horrific 
        school shootings were deterred by the fact that, in addition to 
        murder, gun possession was also illegal in those locations; and
            (7) that the reason that the ``Gun Free School Zones Act'' 
        has made American schools unsafe is that shooters now know that 
        they can victimize American school campuses with no fear that 
        victims will be armed.
    (b) Purpose.--It is the purpose of this Act to restore safety to 
America's schools by allowing staff, teachers, and administrators to 
defend the children and themselves.

SEC. 3. SAFE SCHOOLS.

    Subsection (q) of section 922 of Title 18, United States Code, is 
repealed.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 215 (Monday, November 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28461]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION

Sunshine Act Meeting of the Board of Directors, Operations and 
Regulations Committee

TIME AND DATE: The Operations and Regulations Committee of the Legal 
Services Corporation Board of Directors will meet on November 10, 2000. 
The meeting will begin at 11:30 a.m. and continue until the Committee 
concludes its agenda.

LOCATION: Marriott at Metro Center, 775 12th Street, NW, Washington, 
D.C.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   
1. Approval of agenda.
2. Approval of the minutes of the Committee's meeting of September 
18, 2000.
3. Staff report on the status of actions relating to 45 CFR Part 
1628 (Recipient Fund Balances) and the proposed Property Acquisition 
and Management Manual.
4. Consider and act on potential rulemaking action implementing the 
findings of the Erlenborn Commission.
5. Consider and act on Report of the Regulations Review Task Force.
6. Consider and act on other business.
7. Public comment.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Victor M. Fortuno, Vice President for 
Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary, at (202) 336-
8800.

SPECIAL NEEDS: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Shannon Nicko Adaway, at (202) 336-8800.

    Dated: November 1, 2000.
Victor M. Fortuno,
Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate 
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28461 Filed 11-1-00; 4:56 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 82 (Monday, April 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 25084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10010]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS13-10]

Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in closed session:
    Location: OCC--400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20024.
    Date: May 8, 2013.
    Time: Immediately following the ASC open session.
    Status: Closed.
    Matters To Be Considered:

April 10, 2013 minutes--Closed Session
Preliminary discussion of State Compliance Reviews

     Dated; April 23, 2013.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-10010 Filed 4-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
```
Tuesday 14th 

 January, 1997. 

Thomas Payne Brown, Jr., Appellant, 

 against Record No. 0926-94-2 

 Circuit Court No. 91-654-F 

Commonwealth of Virginia, Appellee. 

Upon a Rehearing En Banc 

 Before Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Benton, Coleman, 

 Willis, Elder, Bray, Fitzpatrick, Annunziata and Overton 

 Steven D. Benjamin (Betty Layne DesPortes; 

Steven D. Benjamin and Associates, on 

brief), for appellant. 

 Eugene Murphy, Assistant Attorney General 

(James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on 

brief), for appellee. 

This cause was reviewed on rehearing en banc, and upon 

consideration of the arguments of counsel and the entire record in 

this case, the judgment of the trial court rendered on April 26, 1994 

is affirmed without opinion by an equally divided court. Accordingly, 

the opinion previously rendered by a panel of this Court on April 23, 

1996 is withdrawn, and the mandate entered that date is vacated. The 

appellant shall pay to the Commonwealth of Virginia thirty dollars 

damages. 

This order shall be published and certified to the trial 

court. 

 A Copy, 

 Teste: 

 Cynthia L. McCoy, Clerk 

 By: 

 

 Deputy Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2445

MARIA ANTONIA LOVATO-GRANADOS; K.N.C.L.,

Petitioners,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: July 29, 2020 Decided: August 19, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron R. Caruso, ABOD & CARUSO, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, for Petitioners. 

Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Anthony P. Nicastro, Assistant Director, 

Jonathan Robbins, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil 

Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Maria Antonia Lovato-Granados and her minor daughter, natives and citizens of El 

Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) 

dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying Lovato-Granados’ 

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention 

Against Torture. We have considered the Petitioners’ claims after thoroughly reviewing 

the record and conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any 

of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2018), and that substantial 

evidence supports the Board’s decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481

(1992).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 

See In re Lovato-Granados (B.I.A. Nov. 27, 2019). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITTION DENIED
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF KPMG LLP**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Turnstone Systems, Inc.: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-36342 and No. 333-57224) on Form S-8 of TurnstoneSystems, Inc., of our report dated January 17, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Turnstone Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations,stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K ofTurnstone Systems, Inc. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

MountainView, California 

March 17, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-20543

MARLON DANTRUCE WILLIAMS, 

 Petitioner–Appellant,

v.

LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, 

 Respondent–Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:14-CV-2098

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee Lorie Davis’s unopposed motion to cancel 

oral argument is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee Lorie Davis’s unopposed 

motion to waive the exhaustion requirement pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(3) 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 29, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-20543 Document: 00513817026 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/29/2016
No. 14-20543

2

with respect to those claims that were raised in Appellant Marlon Dantruce 

Williams’s state habeas application is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court’s judgment is 

VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to the district court to review 

Appellant Marlon Dantruce Williams’s federal habeas application on the 

merits with respect to those claims that were raised in Appellant’s state habeas 

application. This is a full remand. We place no limit on the matters that the 

district court may address, as needed, and we express no view on what rulings 

that court should make.

 Case: 14-20543 Document: 00513817026 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/29/2016