alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09

- 22

- 00319

- CV

__________________ RONALD LYONS , Appellant
V.
O. W. COLLINS APARTMENTS , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 137,932

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Ronald Lyons, appearing pro se, appeals from a judgment granting O.W. Collins Apartments possession of an apartment located at 4440 Gulfway Drive, Port Arthur, Texas and $444.15 in past

- due rent. After Lyons filed his appeal, he failed
to file a brief.
On December 19 , 2022, the Court Clerk notified the parties that Lyons ’ brief
had not been filed

. In the letter, Lyons was advised that the appeal would be
submitted withou t briefs unless we received his brief and a motion to extend the2 deadline in which he had to file his brief within ten days . The letter further warned Lyons the appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if the Court submitted the appeal without bri efs.
On January 13 , 202 3 , the Clerk notified the parties the appeal would be
submitted to the Court on February 3 , 202 3 , without briefs and without oral
argument. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. In the absence of a brief assigning any error s
for the Court to review, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM

Submitted on February 3, 2023 O pinion Delivered March 2, 2023
Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.
EXHIBIT 99.2



BORDERS
GROUP, INC.

STATEMENT
OF GREGORY P. JOSEFOWICZ,CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
BORDERS GROUP, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory P. Josefowicz,
certify that the Form 10-Q, dated April 27, 2003, of Borders Group, Inc. fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information
contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Borders Group, Inc.

Date: June 11, 2003

/s/ GREGORY P. JOSEFOWICZ
-----------------------------------------------
Gregory P. Josefowicz
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Borders Group, Inc.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Borders Group,
Inc. and will be retained by Borders Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 8**

 

List of Principal Subsidiaries

Of

Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V.

 
| **Subsidiary**                                                              | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                                                        |       |                              |
| Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A.B. de C.V. (“GIMSA”)                 |       | Mexico                            |
|                                                                        |       |                              |
| Molinera de México, S.A. de C.V. (“Molinera de México”) |       | Mexico                            |
|                                                                        |       |                              |
| Productos y Distribuidora Azteca, S.A. de C.V. (“PRODISA”)        |       | Mexico                            |
|                                                                        |       |                              |
| Gruma Corporation                                                           |       | Nevada, United States             |
|                                                                        |       |                              |
| Azteca Milling LP                                                           |       | Texas, United States              |
|                                                                        |       |                              |
| Gruma Centroamérica, LLC(1)                                            |       | Nevada, United States             |
|                                                                        |       |                              |
| Molinos Nacionales, C.A. (“MONACA”)                               |       | Venezuela                         |
|                                                                        |       |                              |
| Derivados de Maíz Seleccionado, C.A. (“DEMASECA”)            |       | Venezuela                         |
|                                                                        |       |                              |
| Investigación de Tecnología Avanzada, S.A. de C.V.                |       | Mexico                            |

 

----

(1)          As part of a corporate restructuring of our CentralAmerican operations, on January 1, 2009 all subsidiaries of GrumaCentroamérica, LLC were transferred to Gruma International Foods, S.L., acorporation organized under the laws of the Kingdom of Spain. Gruma Centroamérica, LLC. was dissolvedon December 31, 2008.

 

----
[Graphic Omitted]
    [NUMBER]                                                        [SHARES]
                  INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
                                     TEXAS


                         DISCOUNT MORTGAGE SOURCE, INC.

The Corporation is authorized to issue 50,000,000 Common Shares Par Value $0.001
each


                                    SPECIMEN


This Certifies that ___________________________________________  is the owner of
_______________________________________________________________   fully paid and
non-assessable  Shares  of  the  above  Corporation  transferable  only  on  the
books of  the Corporation by  the holder hereof in person or  by duly authorized
Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

In Witness  Whereof,  the said  Corporation  has caused this  Certificate  to be
signed by its duly  authorized  officers  and to be sealed  with the Seal of the
Corporation.

Dated____________________


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1998 and the Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the nine month period ended September 30, 1998 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         722,551
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,079,234
<ALLOWANCES>                                   549,747
<INVENTORY>                                 17,520,523
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,099,334
<PP&E>                                       3,155,932
<DEPRECIATION>                                 888,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,892,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,821,982
<BONDS>                                      1,044,821
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 22,333,000
<COMMON>                                         2,384
<OTHER-SE>                                   (310,078)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,892,109
<SALES>                                     34,132,176
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,132,176
<CGS>                                       20,002,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,002,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,579,703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,301,358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                248,932
<INCOME-TAX>                                    92,851
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            156,081
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   156,081
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.4

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thomas J. McDonald, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of SkillSoft Public
Limited Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Omitted;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [Not applicable]

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  April 14, 2005

                                        /s/ Thomas J. McDonald
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Thomas J. McDonald
                                        Chief Financial Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1648

_____________________________

S.B., the Natural Mother of

J.K.B., G.K.R.B., K.M.B., Minor 

Children,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND 

FAMILIES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County.

William W. Blue, Judge.

August 20, 2018

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See J.B. v. Fla. Dep’t of Children & Families, 170 

So. 3d 780 (Fla. 2015) (holding that a motion alleging ineffective 

assistance of counsel in a termination of parental rights 

proceeding is deemed denied twenty-five days after the motion is 

filed).

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and KELSEY and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

David J. Joffe of Joffe Law, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant, 

and S.B., pro se, Appellant.

Ward L. Metzger, Appellate Counsel, Department of Children 

and Families, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
Appendix D1

Clovis 1 Field Data Sheets
(This page intentionally blank.)
Page D1-1
Page D1-2
Page D1-3
Page D1-4
Page D1-5
Page D1-6
Page D1-7
Page D1-8

(This page intentionally blank.)
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL HAGAN, DOC #18547, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3524

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed April 18, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Neil A. Roddenberry, Judge.

Michael Hagan, pro se. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
#### SANDOVAL v. STATE.

No. 21596.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 21, 1941.

P. C. Ibarra, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was given five years in the penitentiary on a charge of robbery. He filed a motion for a new trial and to his amended motion he attached affidavit of two witnesses, setting up matter pertinent to his defense. Each witness testified that they did not know that he was tried and convicted until they were approached by parties afterward, evidently persons interested in appellant’s case. It appears that if such persons had approached these witnesses prior to the trial they would have secured their attendance and the very valuable information which their evidence appears to give. These witnesses were parties present at the bar room where the robbery was alleged to have taken place, and a normal investigation would have led to them.

From all the circumstances it appears that no diligence was used to obtain the testimony of these witnesses in behalf of the accused at the trial. Under the well settled rules the plea for a new trial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence must be overruled.

The evidence in the case was controverted and it was the province of the jury to pass on it, which they did adversely to appellant. It was evidence which, if believed, amply sustained the verdict which they returned. Other matters appearing in the record are irregular, but there are no bills of exception and they are matters which the appellant could, and apparently did, waive.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with the Annual Report of Elite  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended  March 31, 2006 filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),  I, Bernard J. Berk,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of
                  the  Company as of the dates  presented  and the  consolidated
                  result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Date:    June 29, 2006               /s/ Bernard J. Berk
                                     ----------------------------------
                                    Bernard J. Berk
                                    Chief Executive Officer of
                                    Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

This  certification  has been  furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Elite  Pharmaceuticals,   Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Elite
Pharmaceuticals  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

YVON PLAISIR,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-1683

[October 12, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; James W. McCann, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

562014CF003716B.

Ana Gomez-Mallada, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven 

Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

SHELA B. ACOSTA,

Plaintiff. 

v. No. 4:22-cv-0233-P

ARLINGTON HOUSING AUTHORITY,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton made Findings, 

Conclusions, and a Recommendation (“FCR”) in this case on June 9,

2022. ECF No. 12. The FCR recommended the dismissal of this action 

because Plaintiff failed to comply with the Court’s order to file a 

Complaint that complied with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Id. 

Plaintiff filed an objection to the FCR because she argued that the 

Magistrate Judge incorrectly denied her motion to appoint counsel. ECF 

No. 13. No other objections were raised, and the Magistrate Judge’s FCR 

is ripe for review. 

Plaintiff’s failure to file specific written objections bars her from 

appealing the factual findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate 

judge that are accepted or adopted by the district court, except upon 

grounds of plain error. See Douglass v. United Services Auto. Ass’n, 79 

F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). Here, Plaintiff did not object 

to the dismissal for failure to comply with the Court’s order; she merely 

sought to relitigate her motion to appoint counsel. The Magistrate Judge 

has already considered and addressed her arguments to appoint counsel. 

The Court is “not obligated to address objections [which are merely 

recitations of the identical arguments made before the Magistrate 

Judge] because . . . such objections undermine the purpose of the Federal 

Case 4:22-cv-00233-P Document 14 Filed 06/24/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 26
2

Magistrate’s Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636, which serves to reduce duplicative 

work and conserve judicial resources[.]” Owens v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 

1:13-47, 2013 WL 1304470, at *3 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 28, 2013) (emphasis 

in original. Accordingly, the undersigned reviewed the FCR for plain 

error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the 

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the reasoning in the Magistrate 

Judge’s FCR and OVERRULES Plaintiff’s objection. Accordingly, 

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant in the instant action are hereby 

DISMISSED without prejudice. 

SO ORDERED on this 24th day of June, 2022.

______________________________

Mark T. Pittman

United States District Judge

Case 4:22-cv-00233-P Document 14 Filed 06/24/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 27
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                 SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                            87,523
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 112,523
<PP&E>                                                            96,064
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    59,542
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   149,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          2,426,705
<BONDS>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                          21,192
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (2,298,852)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     149,045
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       0
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 244,867
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                79,974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (457,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (457,841)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (457,841)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (.02)



</TABLE>