alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ex parte EVERETT.

No. 23897.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 22, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

This proceeding was instituted for the purpose of securing bail for this appellant together with a codefendant charged with murder. Upon a hearing held and concluded on September 13, 1947, bail was granted by the Honorable L. Broeter, Judge of the District Court, to Willie Everett in the sum of $5,000; and by the same order the application for bail of Adan Everett, appellant herein, was denied.

Since this appeal was filed the Grand Jury of Duval County has returned an indictment against appellant for murder, charging the same offense for which he was held in the proceeding before us. Under the rules this calls for a dismissal of the case now on appeal, which is accordingly done.
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JAN 9 2001

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v. No. 00-1364

MARK E. McKINNA,

Respondent-Appellee.

(D.C. No. 00-Z-1443)

(D.Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before SEYMOUR , EBEL and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Petitioner John Robert Demos, a state prisoner appearing pro se, seeks a

certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.
2

§ 2241 habeas petition. We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.

In March 1999, Demos was temporarily transferred from a state prison in

Washington to a private correctional facility in Colorado. In his habeas petition,

he sought release from custody, challenging the legality of his transfer. In

denying relief, the district court held that a claim of state law violation is not

cognizable in a federal habeas action and, even if Demos’ claim could be

construed as a federal constitutional claim, it lacked merit.

In Montez v. McKinna , 208 F.3d 862, 865-66 (10th Cir. 2000), this court

held there is no federal statutory or constitutional prohibition against the transfer

of an inmate from one state to a private facility in another state. To avoid

application of Montez , Demos contends his transfer violated his state

constitutional rights and state law. Questions of state law are not cognizable in a

federal habeas action. Id. at 865.

Demos’ motions for an evidentiary hearing, to supplement the record, to

add additional proffers of proof, to set the case on the oral argument calendar, for

bail and/or release on recognizance, for appointment of counsel, and for an order

to show cause are DENIED. Demos has not made “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right,” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), and his request for a

certificate of appealability is DENIED. The appeal is DISMISSED. Demos’
3

motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. The mandate shall

issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Mary Beck Briscoe

Circuit Judge
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 22233.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 2, 1942.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal Jan. 6, 1943.

Jones & Jones, of Mineóla, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This purports to be an appeal from a conviction for unlawfully selling whisky in a dry area, with a fine of $130 affixed as-the punishment.

The record before us fails to reflect a final judgment in the case, in the absence of which this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Hellman v. State, 87 Tex.Cr.R. 460, 222 S.W. 980; Ellis v. State, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 339, 145 S.W.2d 176.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been considered by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

For the reasons stated in Craig v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 167 S.W.2d 523, this day decided, the motion for rehearing is granted and the appeal is reinstated.

The appeal is based on the same grounds and the error found in the record is identical with that found in the Craig case. See Watson v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 632, 122 S.W.2d 311.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7095

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARCUS DUKE SHELTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-90-208-R, CA-97-287-R) Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 19, 1998 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marcus Duke Shelton, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Shelton , Nos. CR-90-208-R; CA-97-287-R (W.D. Va. July 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JoAnne Downey, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 298 C.D. 2016

:

Unemployment Compensation :

Board of Review, :

Respondent :

O R D E R

NOW, January 4, 2017, upon consideration of petitioner’s

application for reconsideration and respondent’s no-answer letter in response 

thereto, the application is denied.

 MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

 President Judge
Air Quality Program 

Sacaton, AZ. 85247 

We would like to request placement on the agenda for the upcoming 

Community meeting on 5-236 . The air quality program will make a presentation on the following 

The presentation will be given by ?& bbJ;d( R 

Please call Janet Travis at (520) 562-2234 ext. 286 to confirm 

placement on the agenda. 

Thank-you 
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT 

TIME : 05/09/2005 09:11 

NAME : DEPT DEQ 

FAX : 5205622245 

TEL : 5205622234 

DATE, TIME 

FAX NO. /NAME 

DURATION 

PAGECS) 

RESULT 

MODE 

- - 

OK 

STANDARD 

ECM 

To; District 6 

We would like to request placement on the agenda for the upcoming 

Community meeting on 5-236 - 

The air quality program will make a presentation on the following 

p4-UQ5-t @v c.ow\& 

GfP-A)y ~pk- -b re d 

pot(u+.07bv\ ,mi+ii2 kw.W*: %. 

The presentation will be given by %!d *id<
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                     RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of HyperDynamics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kent P. Watts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: February 14, 2005                         By:   /s/ Kent P. Watts
                                                      -----------------
                                                Kent P. Watts
                                                Chief Financial Officer
#### COMMONWEALTH ex rel. v. ST. MATTHEWS GAS & ELECTRIC SHOP, Inc. COMMONWEALTH ex rel. v. KENTUCKY GAS SERVICE, Inc. COMMONWEALTH ex rel. v. BUTLER PLUMBING & HEATING CO., Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 24, 1952.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 12, 1952.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Hal Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., Douglas W. Faris, Louisville, for appellant.

Henry J. Burt, Jr., Louisville,for appel-lees.

WADDILL, Commissioner.

The Commonwealth appeals from three judgments of the Jefferson ¡Circuit Court disallowing retroactive assessment of intangible property for taxation in excess of 3 years from the filing of the Commonwealth’s petition and denying penalties which the Commonwealth sought to assess under the provisions of KRS 132.290, 132.-330, and 132.340. Appellee contends, and the court apparently held, that the penalty provisions of KRS 132.290 whereby 100% penalty is levied against a taxpayer who fails to list intangible property for assessment, plus a 20% penalty in case the Commonwealth brings an action to collect the tax and penalty, are in contravention of Section 1, subsection 5, Section 2, and Section 26 of the Constitution of Kentucky.

Question has been raised as to whether the amount in controversy is sufficient to give us jurisdiction. However, this Court will exercise jurisdiction in cases involving questions of taxation regardless of the amount in controversy. Merchants Wholesale Grocery Co. v. City of Frankfort, Ky., 244 S.W.2d 468; Buckner v. Clay, 306 Ky. 194, 206 S.W.2d 827.

Revenue raised by taxation is the very life blood of the state, and the power *674to impose penalties to insure compliance with tax statutes is coeval with Government. This Court is not concerned with the wisdom or expediency of the determination of the legislature as to what penalties are necessary in order to ensure compliance with the statute. Our sole concern is whether or not the penalty imposed is arbitrary or confiscatory. Kentucky Tax Commission v. Lincoln Bank & Trust Co., Ky., 245 S.W.2d 950.

We cannot say that the penalties exacted under KRS 132.290 exceed the limitations placed upon the legislature by our constitution.

The sections of our statutes in question provide for retroactive assessment of omitted intangibles within a period of 10 years, by an action by the Department of Revenue. Therefore, it is manifest that the circuit court was in error in failing to order the county court to follow the plain language of KRS 132.290. See Davis v. Becker, 309 Ky. 775, 219 S.W.2d 6.

The judgments are reversed with directions to the circuit court* to enter judgments consistent with this opinion.
#### HENDERSON v. STATE.

No. 25497.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 21, 1951.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of beer for the purpose of sale in a dry area, and the punishment is assessed at a fine of $200.00.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Economic Injury Disaster #9J35] 

Kenai Peninsula Borough and the contiguous Boroughs of Matanuska-Susitna and Lake and Peninsula, together with the Regional Educational Attendance Area #10 (Chugach) and the Municipality of Anchorage, in the State of Alaska, constitute an economic injury disaster area due to severe storms and flooding in September of 1995 that resulted in a low return of sockeye salmon to their spawning grounds in the lower Kenai River during the year 2000. Eligible small businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere may file applications for economic injury assistance for this disaster until the close of business on July 24, 2001 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 4 Office, P. O. Box 13795, Sacramento, CA 95853-4795. 

The interest rate for eligible small businesses and small agricultural cooperatives is 4 percent. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59002.) 

Dated: October 24, 2000.

Kris Swedin,

Acting Administrator.

[FR Doc. 00-28453 Filed 11-6-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
-- -

·- t. J ;,**-~ ~·**  .

__

### {i81{UJtf(~3

## 1**~o(5 ~-**  

### en uk 

# r 0 f-**~f;t_!VrtfJ** 

### !tl

- 

### lf?i!_Yk!_s 

## () [**1-e~t~** RECEIVED IN

_



### __ 1]_(). 

## 5Pt /)36f - ·**~QF-CRJMJNAl-APPEAtS** FEB-2-6-2015

--

### --~-1l~7.f7/ 

### ( Abel Acosta, Clerk

### ~-E£~ 

# r.t**-o51l=-tY--l~i?.b-** 

### osf]3-0!±.
- - _**~** e(X 

### u_e:sL£12 &- ''**L~** k{

_**Re.P-r~se;v-Jrrr~rD** 

### {\)/)

-**bih~'&-i** 

### uest fo 

### La**+etJ~** tJ 

### ll · .

- 

### &t e lf_ecUtrrJT 

### E uE"f ))

- 

# :**JJ~J?!J** bfY!

### dl_,c1f1~

### i!otJ~~**-l~fif'A**

### w~'t 

## · 

## ¥o**~ ~~·**  LW.}-_!A-

___ --- .

### ~**~fl-esfr5/i5~** 

## +> hC**'fA~ ~~~·Jiiilf**  

### BRief

. -· 

# mat-musf BG 

# Hkl WifJlw£ 

### 3D 

## betY-s v

### !~**~',** 

# ,**~=filccY-; ~jftv~**  

## fl6f**&~N tvhi1'1!~** **;1~~1iJit(** 

# ·**~CL~f ~** **~rese~fJ ~**  I 

## :**~oitJiiL3 'fV\~.** **~lJb** 

### fJuL 

# lirJ

'" l**~.1** .\

### Z_Ms~**.:'JJ4R~S~** fJ,**,wot;E;l-aE~** 13

## ;;_~f Itt!_ 

### L;CfeiJsrofJ 

### .:(;**fl~**

vI A

- .. • - . ( [/}_DI1fJ**/1!1til!A/tl~-.** -/t3-s**/-sh+--~r;J-cv--~-** --,--- --,----H---HU-**~~-~-'\..---L-1.** . , 

## ' w 6

### /A_~ 

### q 

## fldff&J- tJJfJ{)M?fd__, 0 (/ I '



### · Boo K:rtJ 

## 1t !3 ot2 f 3155 <**~,~-- ~~jft~·~_·t_~~~-0_6~~7~~~+-·~~~·** **~----------'-**

)

(
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,747
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              11
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,775
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     30,658
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          31,333
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            31,494
<LOANS>                                        141,679
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,248
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,685
<DEPOSITS>                                     179,895
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,761
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           264
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 220,685
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,910
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,582
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,493
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,599
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,599
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,894
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       25
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 354
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,843
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,843
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,420
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.30
<LOANS-NON>                                        122
<LOANS-PAST>                                       788
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   151
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,254
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       44
<RECOVERIES>                                        13
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,248
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,248
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 230 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

<DOC>

        H.Con.Res.230
                                        Agreed to March 26, 1994        

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 1804) to improve learning and 
teaching by providing a national framework for education reform; to 
promote the research, consensus building, and systemic changes needed 
to ensure equitable educational opportunities and high levels of 
educational achievement for all students; to provide a framework for 
reauthorization of all Federal education programs; to promote the 
development and adoption of a voluntary national system of skill 
standards and certifications; and for other purposes, the Clerk of the 
House of Representatives shall make the following correction: in 
section 1043(c)(1), after ``within any indoor facility'' insert ``in 
the United States''.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit 23.2**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-125887, 333-92511,333-41204 and 333-90048 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-131768 on Form SB-2 ofInPlay Technologies, Inc. (formerly Duraswitch Industries, Inc.) of our report dated March 15,2006, relating to the financial statements appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of InPlayTechnologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

 DALLAS DIVISION 

THOMAS LENOIS, #2360417, § 

 § 

Plaintiff, § 

 § 

V. § No. 3:22-CV-523-N-BK 

 § 

HUTCHINS STATE JAIL, § 

 § 

Defendant. § 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed. The Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, 

and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate. 

SO ORDERED this 13th day of May, 2022. 

____________________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cv-00523-N-BK Document 6 Filed 05/13/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 8
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3085 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3085

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 3349 West 111th Street in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``Captain 
            Herbert Johnson Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPTAIN HERBERT JOHNSON MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3349 West 111th Street in Chicago, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Captain Herbert Johnson Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Captain 
Herbert Johnson Memorial Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```