alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00447

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF L.G., K.M. AND

J.H., C HILDREN §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 233rd District Court

of Tarrant County ( 233

- 64 2555

- 18 )

April 5, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is af firmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s / Brian Walker

Justice Brian Walker
EXHIBIT
      14.1








CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
      have
      issued our report dated May 23, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial
      statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Jinpan International
      Limited on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent
      to
      the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement
      (Form S-8 No. 333-9524) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option Plan of Jinpan
      International Limited.











/s/
      Grant
      Thornton


Hong
      Kong


July
      10,
      2006
EXHIBIT 1 

Case 3:22-cv-00594-E-BT Document 33-1 Filed 11/10/22 Page 1 of 5 PageID 117
Case 3:22-cv-00594-E-BT Document 33-1 Filed 11/10/22 Page 2 of 5 PageID 118

EXHIBIT 1
450-2020-06863

Case 3:22-cv-00594-E-BT Document 33-1 Filed 11/10/22 Page 3 of 5 PageID 119

EXHIBIT 1
Case 3:22-cv-00594-E-BT Document 33-1 Filed 11/10/22 Page 4 of 5 PageID 120

EXHIBIT 1
Case 3:22-cv-00594-E-BT Document 33-1 Filed 11/10/22 Page 5 of 5 PageID 121

EXHIBIT 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

BENITA D. NESBY,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 4:22-cv-0167-P

ALL COMMERCIAL FLOORS,

Defendant.

ORDER

Before the Court are Plaintiff Benita Nesby’s Motion for Leave to 

Proceed in forma pauperis (“Motion”) and United States Magistrate 

Judge Cureton’s Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. ECF 

Nos. 2, 6. The Court, having conducted a review for plain error and 

finding none, ACCEPTS Judge Cureton’s Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation and DENIES the Motion for Leave to Proceed in 

forma pauperis.

As recommended in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions, 

and Recommendation, the Court informs Plaintiff that the complaint 

will be subject to dismissal without further notice under Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 41(b) unless, within seven days of this Order, Plaintiff 

pays the clerk of Court the filing and administrative fees of $402.00.

SO ORDERED on this 6th day of April, 2022. 

Mark T. Pittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cv-00167-P Document 7 Filed 04/06/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 25
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3570 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3570

  To prohibit the United States from following guidance issued by the 
Secretary of the Treasury regarding how multilateral development banks 
should engage with developing countries on coal-fired power generation, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2013

 Mr. McKinley (for himself, Mr. Rahall, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Stivers, Mr. 
 Barr, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mrs. Wagner, Mr. Pearce, and Mr. Rothfus) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the United States from following guidance issued by the 
Secretary of the Treasury regarding how multilateral development banks 
should engage with developing countries on coal-fired power generation, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FOLLOWING GUIDANCE ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY OF 
              THE TREASURY REGARDING HOW MULTILATERAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS 
              SHOULD ENGAGE WITH DEVELOPING COUNTRIES ON COAL-FIRED 
              POWER GENERATION.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall direct the United States 
Executive Director at each multilateral development bank (within the 
meaning of section 1701(c)(4) of the International Development 
Institutions Act) to--
            (1) disregard the document issued by the Secretary of the 
        Treasury, entitled ``Guidance for U.S. Positions on MDBs 
        Engaging with Developing Countries on Coal-Fired Power 
        Generation'', dated October 29, 2013, and any other document 
        issued subsequently by the Secretary that sets forth policies, 
        strategies, procedures, or positions substantially similar to 
        the policies, strategies, procedures, and positions set forth 
        in that document; and
            (2) not use the voice, vote, or influence of the United 
        States to propose, advance, or implement any policy, strategy, 
        procedure, or position set forth in that document.
                                 <all>
```
#### BALEMON v. STATE.

*No.*25116.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 24, 1951.

None on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The penalty assessed is a fine of $50.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or hills of exception. All matters of procedure appear to be in regular form.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 215 (Monday, November 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28411]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications Systems; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meetings of the Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and 
Communications Systems (1196):

    Date and Time: November 13, 2000; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Contact Person: Dr. Filbert Bartoli, Program Director, Division 
of Electrical and Communications Systems, National Science 
Foundations, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 675, Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 292-8339.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate CAREER (MEMS) proposals submitted 
in response to program announcement NSF 00-89 as part of the 
selection process for awards.

    Date and Time: November 28-29, 2000; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Contact Person: Dr. Kishan Baheti, Program Director, Control, 
Networks and Computational Intelligence (CNCI), Division of 
Electrical and Communications Systems, National Science Foundations, 
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 675, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 
(703) 292-8339.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate research proposals in the CNCI 
program as part of the selection process for awards.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 680, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meetings: Closed.
    Purpose of Meetings: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are within exemptions 4 and 6 of 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c), (4) and (6) the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 27, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-28411 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 10

Expressing the sense of the Congress that tax legislation should not take

effect earlier than 90 days after implementing regulations are issued.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. NEAL of North Carolina submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that tax legislation

should not take effect earlier than 90 days after implementing regulations are issued.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that no

3 provision of law affecting the tax liability of any person

4 should take effect earlier than the day 90 days after the

5 date on which regulations implementing such provision are

6 issued by the Internal Revenue Service.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

 

STEPHEN ANTHONEY EDWARDS, §

TDCJ No. 1260584, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Civil Action No. 7:22-cv-00028-M-BP

 § 

JIMMY SMITH, et al., §

§ 

Defendants. §

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the 

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

It is therefore ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED this 10th day of June, 2022.

Case 7:22-cv-00028-M-BP Document 8 Filed 06/10/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 16
Order entered March 29, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01068-CR

No. 05-18-01069-CR

ROBERT HOWARD GREEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F16-76425-T & F16-76426-T

ORDER

Before the Court is the March 27, 2019 request of court reporter Debi Harris for an 

additional forty-five days in which to complete the reporter’s record. Rule 35.3 provides that 

each extension “must not exceed 30 days.” TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3. However, in light of the 

extraordinary circumstances presented in her request, we invoke rule 2 and suspend rule 35.3’s 

operation in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2. We ORDER the reporter’s record due on or before 

May 15, 2019.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Lela Lawrence 

Mays, Presiding Judge, 283rd Judicial District Court; Debi Harris; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,784
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,491)
<INVENTORY>                                     30,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,850
<PP&E>                                          40,702
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,360)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 198,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,952
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,679
<COMMON>                                        32,143
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,116)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   198,825
<SALES>                                        257,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               257,040
<CGS>                                          219,497
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (446)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    845
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,096)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,885
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (251)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES



|                  |  |                                     
|----------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|COUNTRY OR REGION |  | OFFICIAL NAME                       
|Australia         |  | Turnstone Australia Pty. Ltd.       
|                  | 
|Brazil            |  | Turnstone do Brasil Ltda.           
|                  | 
|Cayman Islands    |  | Turnstone Systems International Ltd.
|                  | 
|Delaware          |  | Turnstone Holdings LLC              
|                  | 
|France            |  | Turnstone Systems SARL              
|                  | 
|Germany           |  | Turnstone Systems GmbH              
|                  | 
|Hong Kong         |  | Turnstone Hong Kong Ltd.            
|                  | 
|Singapore         |  | Turnstone Singapore Ltd.            
|                  | 
|United Kingdom    |  | Turnstone International (UK) Limited
SPECIES

DATA_POINTS

AVG_OBS (ug/m3)

AVG_MOD (ug/m3)

MEAN_BIAS (ug/m3)

MEAN_ERROR (ug/m3)

NMB

NME

MFB

MFE

CORR

PMTOT 25 27.87 33.14 5.27 11.46 0.19 0.41 0.27 0.44 0.74

PMNH4 25 4.41 3.43 -0.98 1.67 -0.22 0.38 -0.06 0.46 0.75

PMNO3 25 12.00 10.33 -1.67 4.18 -0.14 0.35 -0.03 0.43 0.80

PMSO4 25 1.57 1.09 -0.48 0.67 -0.30 0.43 -0.26 0.45 0.29

PMOTHR 25 1.07 6.32 5.25 5.25 4.90 4.90 1.45 1.45 0.69

PMEC (New) 25 1.72 3.22 1.49 1.50 0.87 0.87 0.64 0.64 0.71

PMOC (New) 25 4.84 6.19 1.34 2.05 0.28 0.42 0.24 0.38 0.61 SPECIES DATA_POINTS AVG_OBS (ug/m3) AVG_MOD (ug/m3) MEAN_BIAS (ug/m3) MEAN_ERROR (ug/m3) NMB NME MFB MFE CORR

PMTOT 29 28.29 30.51 2.23 10.52 0.08 0.37 0.17 0.40 0.74

PMNH4 30 3.97 3.18 -0.79 1.75 -0.20 0.44 -0.02 0.52 0.74

PMNO3 30 10.36 9.76 -0.61 3.81 -0.06 0.37 0.06 0.45 0.80

PMSO4 30 1.29 0.90 -0.40 0.57 -0.31 0.44 -0.26 0.41 0.17

PMOTHR 29 0.80 6.20 5.39 5.39 6.70 6.70 1.56 1.56 0.60

PMEC 29 1.56 2.44 0.88 0.95 0.56 0.61 0.48 0.51 0.65

PMOC 29 8.28 5.35 -2.93 3.11 -0.35 0.38 -0.42 0.44 0.73 SPECIES DATA_POINTS AVG_OBS (ug/m3) AVG_MOD (ug/m3) MEAN_BIAS (ug/m3) MEAN_ERROR (ug/m3) NMB NME MFB MFE CORR

PMTOT 15 18.00 23.49 5.49 7.96 0.31 0.44 0.30 0.41 0.81

PMNH4 15 2.07 2.07 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.39 0.13 0.46 0.83

PMNO3 15 5.18 5.59 0.42 2.51 0.08 0.48 -0.01 0.51 0.76

PMSO4 15 1.17 1.15 -0.02 0.52 -0.02 0.44 0.20 0.43 0.79

PMOTHR 15 0.78 5.65 4.87 4.87 6.25 6.25 1.54 1.54 0.47

PMEC (New) 15 1.34 2.11 0.77 0.81 0.58 0.61 0.49 0.52 0.72

PMOC (New) 15 4.20 4.89 0.69 1.72 0.16 0.41 0.13 0.36 0.73 SPECIES DATA_POINTS AVG_OBS (ug/m3) AVG_MOD (ug/m3) MEAN_BIAS (ug/m3) MEAN_ERROR (ug/m3) NMB NME MFB MFE CORR

PMTOT 15 30.40 22.49 -7.91 10.04 -0.26 0.33 -0.23 0.38 0.79

PMNH4 15 4.42 2.85 -1.56 1.82 -0.35 0.41 -0.26 0.47 0.90

PMNO3 15 12.30 8.93 -3.37 4.30 -0.27 0.35 -0.18 0.43 0.90

PMSO4 15 1.43 0.68 -0.75 0.78 -0.53 0.55 -0.61 0.66 0.15

PMOTHR 15 0.96 4.85 3.90 3.90 4.07 4.07 1.39 1.39 0.49

PMEC (New) 15 1.35 1.17 -0.18 0.40 -0.14 0.30 -0.15 0.33 0.59

PMOC (New) 15 4.89 2.82 -2.07 2.11 -0.42 0.43 -0.54 0.55 0.43

*: The correlation coefficient is "R" instead of "R2"

*: NMB: normalized mean bias; NME: normalized mean error; MFB: mean fractional bias; MFE: mean fractional error

Bakersfield - California Street

Fresno - 1st Street

Modesto - 14th Street

Visalia - North Church Street
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF BERTHEL GROWTH & INCOME
TRUST I AS OF JUNE 30, 1998, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF
THE TRUST FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          63,551
<SECURITIES>                                 7,163,451
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,257,659
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,313,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,037,110
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,276,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,276,302
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               291,617
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               188,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                103,517
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            103,517
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   103,517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     9.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     9.82
        

</TABLE>
#### PORTER v. STATE.

*No.*25031.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 13, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The offense is driving a motor vehicle upon a public 'highway while intoxicated and the punishment, a fine of $50.

No bills of exception or statement of facts appear in the record. Nothing is presented for the consideration of this court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                    AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is entered
into as of the 31st day of January, 1997, by and between Renaissance Solutions,
Inc. (the "Corporation") and Harry M. Lasker (the "Employee").

     Whereas, the Corporation and the Employee are parties to an Employment
Agreement dated as of January 31, 1995, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to
Employment Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1996; and

     Whereas, pursuant to Section 1 of the Employment Agreement, the term of the
Employment Agreement is two years; and

     Whereas, the Corporation and the Employee desire to extend the term of the
Employment Agreement by an additional year;

     Now, therefore, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

     1.   Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated
in its entirety to read as follows:

          "1.  Term of Employment.  The Corporation hereby agrees to employ the
               ------------------                                              
          Employee, and the Employee hereby accepts employment with the
          Corporation, upon the terms set forth in this Agreement, for the
          period commencing on the date hereof (the "Commencement Date") and
          ending on the third anniversary of the date hereof, unless earlier
          terminated in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 hereof (such
          period being hereinafter referred to as the "Employment Period").
          Each of the one-year periods commencing on the Commencement Date and
          on each of the first and second anniversaries thereof is referred to
          herein as an "Employment Year.""

     2.   The second sentence of Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement is
hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

          "The Board of Directors may increase, but not decrease the annual base
          salary for the second or third Employment Year."

     3.   In all other respects, the Employment Agreement are hereby ratified
and shall remain in full force and effect.

 
<PAGE>
 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of
the day and year set forth above.

                                    RENAISSANCE SOLUTIONS, INC.


                                    By: /s/ William T. Jenkins
                                       -------------------------------------

                                    Title:  Vice President Finance and
                                            Administration


                                    EMPLOYEE:


                                    /s/  Harry M. Lasker
                                    ----------------------------------------
                                    Harry M. Lasker

                                      -2-
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                     RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of HyperDynamics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kent P. Watts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 13, 2005                         By:  /s/ Kent P. Watts
                                                -----------------
                                                Kent P. Watts
                                                Chief Financial Officer
----,

1728.

#### Thomas Brooke *against*Thomas Macnemara.

*jE.*Jenings, for plaintiff.

Bladen, for defendant.

THIS was an action of debt on a bond to the plaintiff by the defendant’s father, with a condition to save the plaintiff harmless, for paying a debt due by him to one *Carlton.*The defendant pleaded that the plaintiff was not damnified. Replication. That an attachment against *Carlton*was laid in the hands of the plaintiff as garnishee, and a condemnation was had thereon. General demurrer. The Court adjudged the replication good, which judgment was affirmed on an appeal to the Court of Appeals, at *May*Term, 1729.

The defendant then appealed to the King in Council.

*S. Chase's*notes.