alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO.: 3:22-CR-120-X

§

YOON BAEK (1) §

§

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, 

the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United 

States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in 

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by 

the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and YOON BAEK (1) is hereby adjudged guilty of

18 U.S.C. § 1956(h), 1956(a)(2)(A) – Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering. Sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

 The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

☐ The Court adopts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence 

that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if 

released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c).

☐ Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set 

the conditions of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the 

defendant is likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 

3142(b) or (c).

☐ The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) pending determination of 

whether it has been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the 

defendant should not be detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and 

convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the 

community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). This matter shall be referred to the United States 

Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release.

Signed this 30th day of November, 2022.

________________________________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cr-00120-X Document 27 Filed 11/30/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 59
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule Contians Summary Financial Information Extracted From The
Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets and condensed consolidated
statements of operations filed with Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000939730                     
<NAME>                                         Expert Software, Inc.          
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         5,392
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,191
<INVENTORY>                                    3,061
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17,111
<PP&E>                                         3,999
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,908
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 21,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,303
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       76
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,145
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   21,524
<SALES>                                        9,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,290
<CGS>                                          3,743
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,405
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               130
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,054
<INCOME-TAX>                                   390
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            664
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   664
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .08
        


</TABLE>
LINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANGELO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plainffi,

NO. 6:22-CR-014-01-H

PEDRO GOVEA,

Defendant.

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMEIIDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCER}IING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry

of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation

Conceming Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto

having been filed within fourteen (14) days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

$ 636OXl), the undersigned Disrict Judge is ofthe opinion that the Report and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge conceming the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is

hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty and

Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty.

Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

SO ORDERED.

oatedtuty ft ,2022

JAMES SLEY HENDRIX

LTNI STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:22-cr-00014-H-BU Document 30 Filed 07/18/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 59
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3569 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to add a definition of spouse for 

purposes of veteran benefits that recognizes new State definitions of spouse. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2013 

Mr. WALZ (for himself, Mr. HANNA, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, and Mr. TAKANO) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to add a definition 

of spouse for purposes of veteran benefits that recognizes 

new State definitions of spouse. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting the Free5 doms and Benefits for All Veterans Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3569 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SPOUSE FOR PURPOSES OF VET2 ERAN BENEFITS TO REFLECT NEW STATE 

3 DEFINITIONS OF SPOUSE. 

4 (a) SPOUSE DEFINED.—Section 101 of title 38, 

5 United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘of the oppo7 site sex’’; and 

8 (2) by striking paragraph (31) and inserting 

9 the following new paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(31)(A) An individual shall be considered a ‘spouse’ 

11 if— 

12 ‘‘(i) the marriage of the individual is valid in 

13 the State in which the marriage was entered into; or 

14 ‘‘(ii) in the case of a marriage entered into out15 side any State— 

16 ‘‘(I) if the marriage of the individual is 

17 valid in the place in which the marriage was en18 tered into; and 

19 ‘‘(II)(aa) the marriage could have been en20 tered into in a State; or 

21 ‘‘(bb) the marriage was valid in the place 

22 in which all parties to the marriage resided at 

23 the time the marriage was entered into. 

24 ‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘State’ has the 

25 meaning given that term in paragraph (20), except that 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3569 IH

1 the term also includes the Commonwealth of the Northern 

2 Mariana Islands.’’. 

3 (b) MARRIAGE DETERMINATION.—Section 103(c) of 

4 such title is amended by striking ‘‘according to’’ and all 

5 that follows through the period at the end and inserting 

6 ‘‘in accordance with section 101(31) of this title.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

Knoppow, Brianna

From: Chumble, Prasad

Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 3:42 PM

To: Knoppow, Brianna

Subject: FW: FW: Follow Materials from our Thursday Meeting

Attachments: Welsch et al 2006 BMP Field Manual (USFS-NAASF).pdf; USFS-NAASF BMP Protocol 

Checklist (2007).pdf

Categories: Word Docs or PDFs

From: Gary Schiff   

Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 12:09 PM

To: Chumble, Prasad

Subject: FW: FW: Follow Materials from our Thursday Meeting

Prasad – I believe you received this but just wanted to make sure.   

Thanks,

Gary
EXHIBIT H 

APP048

Case 3:22-cv-00686-X Document 20-8 Filed 05/18/22 Page 1 of 7 PageID 507
	
	 
 APP049

Case 3:22-cv-00686-X Document 20-8 Filed 05/18/22 Page 2 of 7 PageID 508
	
	 
 APP050

Case 3:22-cv-00686-X Document 20-8 Filed 05/18/22 Page 3 of 7 PageID 509
	
	 
 APP051

Case 3:22-cv-00686-X Document 20-8 Filed 05/18/22 Page 4 of 7 PageID 510
	
	 

 APP052

Case 3:22-cv-00686-X Document 20-8 Filed 05/18/22 Page 5 of 7 PageID 511
	
	 
 APP053

Case 3:22-cv-00686-X Document 20-8 Filed 05/18/22 Page 6 of 7 PageID 512
	
	 
 APP054

Case 3:22-cv-00686-X Document 20-8 Filed 05/18/22 Page 7 of 7 PageID 513
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

ERIC LAMAR ELLIS, § 

 § 

Plaintiff, § 

 § 

V. § No. 3:22-cv-675-N 

 § 

RUBI GARZA LOPEZ and BRIAN § 

MARSHALL BARRIER, § 

 § 

Defendants. § 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a 

recommendation in this case. Objections were filed. The District Court reviewed de 

novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to 

which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, 

conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the Court 

ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge. 

SO ORDERED this 6th day of January, 2023. 

 ____________________________________________ 

 DAVID C. GODBEY 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:22-cv-00675-N-BN Document 30 Filed 01/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 155
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,791,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               34,189,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,070,000
<INVENTORY>                                 33,702,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            70,957,000
<PP&E>                                      92,893,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,630,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             196,083,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       69,012,000
<BONDS>                                    125,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,588,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               196,083,000
<SALES>                                     72,064,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            72,064,000
<CGS>                                       58,997,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               58,997,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,824,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,369,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,144,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,144,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,144,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.30)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2 CFO CertificationI, Richard Bjorkman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Sutura, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 20, 2007   /s/ Richard Bjorkman   Richard Bjorkman  Chief Financial Officer
Notice Requirement Relating to the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders



 Exhibit 4(i) 
  
 Notice Requirement Relating to the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders 
  
 The Board of Directors has adopted the following requirement which is applicable to the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
of the Company. Any shareholder that intends to propose a nomination of a director candidate or otherwise submit any proposal relating to the composition of the Board of Directors for consideration at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders must notify
the Corporate Secretary of such nomination or proposal in writing by no later than the close of business on March 17, 2006 in order to be considered timely and appropriate for consideration by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting. The notice
should contain all information concerning any such nominee that would be required to be included in a proxy statement relating to any solicitation of proxies with respect to such nominee by the shareholder and the text of any such proposal; the name
and address, as they appear in the Company’s books, of the shareholder; the number of common shares of the Company that are beneficially owned by the shareholder; and any material interest of the shareholder in such business. Written notice
must be sent to: Corporate Secretary, P.O. Box 256, Dublin, Ohio 43017-0256. No matter will be submitted to vote at the Annual Meeting if written notice has not been given to the Corporate Secretary by such date. No other business other than that
set forth in the formal notice of the meeting shall be considered timely for consideration at the 2006 Annual Meeting.
#### WADE v. STATE.

No. 24446.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 26, 1949.

None on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of selling and possessing for the purpose of sale whiskey without having obtained a license from the Texas Liquor Control Board authorizing him to do so. Plis punishment was assessed at a fine of $100, and from said judgment he has appealed to this court.

The record in this case is before us without a statement of facts or any bills of exceptions. The complaint and information appear to be in due form. Consequently, there is nothing presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                          RENAISSANCE SOLUTIONS, INC.


              COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                 (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                 Three Months Ended                          Nine Months Ended

                                         September 27,          September 29,         September 27,        September 29,
                                             1996                   1995                  1996                  1995
                                       ------------------     ------------------    ------------------    -----------------
<S>                                     <C>                    <C>                   <C>                   <C>          
Weighted average number of
common and common equivalent
shares outstanding:
     Common stock..................                 6,989                  5,968                 6,605                5,481
     Stock Options (treasury                         
stock method)......................                   872                    381                   771                  277 

                                       ==================     ==================    ==================    =================
          Total....................                 7,861                  6,349                 7,376                5,758
                                       ==================     ==================    ==================    =================
Pro forma net income per common        
share..............................    $              .19     $              .13    $              .49    $             .36
                                       ==================     ==================    ==================    ================= 
</TABLE>
Order filed April 24 , 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 11

- 00 856

- CV

____________ SHARON ANN GRIBBLE, Individually and in her Capacity as Guardian of the

Person and Estate of Michael Ray Gribble , Appellant

V.

BRENT ALLEN LAYTON , Appellee

On Appeal from the 306 th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09FD0426



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record in this appeal was filed October 25, 2011

. On February 27,
2012, appellant filed a motion to extend time for filing the record in this case. This court
granted the motion, and on March 15, 2012, issued an order deeming appellant indigent and ordering the record filed. The portion of this court’s March 15, 2012, order that ordered the Galveston County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record in this appeal on or
before April 16, 2012, is WITHDRAWN . The reporter’s record has now been filed, and2

it appears that the record is complete. Therefore, a ppellant’s brief is due within thirty
days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

[to be published]

# STATUS:

Closed meeting.

# PLACE:

450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC.

# DATE PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED:

November 1, 2000.

# CHANGE IN THE MEETING:

Cancellation of Meeting.

 

The closed meeting scheduled for Wednesday, November 8, 2000 at 11 a.m. has been cancelled.

Dated: November 2, 2000.

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-28625  Filed 11-3-00; 12:49 pm]

BILLING CODE 81010-01-M
Case 2:22-cv-00045-Z-BR Document 2 Filed 03/14/22 Page 1 of 15 PageID 2
Case 2:22-cv-00045-Z-BR Document 2 Filed 03/14/22 Page 2 of 15 PageID 3
Case 2:22-cv-00045-Z-BR Document 2 Filed 03/14/22 Page 3 of 15 PageID 4
Case 2:22-cv-00045-Z-BR Document 2 Filed 03/14/22 Page 4 of 15 PageID 5
Case 2:22-cv-00045-Z-BR Document 2 Filed 03/14/22 Page 5 of 15 PageID 6
Case 2:22-cv-00045-Z-BR Document 2 Filed 03/14/22 Page 6 of 15 PageID 7
Case 2:22-cv-00045-Z-BR Document 2 Filed 03/14/22 Page 7 of 15 PageID 8
Case 2:22-cv-00045-Z-BR Document 2 Filed 03/14/22 Page 8 of 15 PageID 9
Case 2:22-cv-00045-Z-BR Document 2 Filed 03/14/22 Page 9 of 15 PageID 10
Case 2:22-cv-00045-Z-BR Document 2 Filed 03/14/22 Page 10 of 15 PageID 11
Case 2:22-cv-00045-Z-BR Document 2 Filed 03/14/22 Page 11 of 15 PageID 12
Case 2:22-cv-00045-Z-BR Document 2 Filed 03/14/22 Page 12 of 15 PageID 13
Case 2:22-cv-00045-Z-BR Document 2 Filed 03/14/22 Page 13 of 15 PageID 14
Case 2:22-cv-00045-Z-BR Document 2 Filed 03/14/22 Page 14 of 15 PageID 15
Case 2:22-cv-00045-Z-BR Document 2 Filed 03/14/22 Page 15 of 15 PageID 16