alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00504-CR

Cristian JAIMES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the Criminal District Court 4, Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1255122D

The Honorable Michael Thomas, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 10, 2013

AFFIRMED

Cristian Jaimes was convicted by a jury of robbery and sentenced to nineteen years 

imprisonment. Jaimes’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional 

evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel 

concludes that the appeal has no merit. Jaimes was provided with a copy of the brief and 

informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 

S.W.2d 83, 85–86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 

n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Jaimes did not file a pro se brief.
04-12-00504-CR

- 2 -

After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we conclude that the appeal is frivolous 

and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. 

Appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 

924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Jaimes wish to seek 

further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Jaimes must either retain an 

attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or Jaimes must file a pro se petition for 

discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from 

the later of: (1) the date of this opinion; or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is 

overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be 

filed in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for 

discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4.

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

QUENTIN ALONSO CORDOVA, #07158509 §

 §

Movant, §

§

V. § Civil No. 3:22-CV-748-M-BK

§ (Criminal No. 3:20-CR-377-M-1)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation 

in this case. Objections were filed [ECF No. 4]. The District Court reviewed de novo those 

portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to which objection was 

made, and reviewed the remaining proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for 

plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 26th day of April, 2022.

Case 3:22-cv-00748-M-BK Document 5 Filed 04/26/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 18
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Power & Equipment Corp. &
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, C.Dean McLain, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




                                           /s/ C. Dean McLain
                                           ----------------------
                                           Name: C.Dean McLain
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Date: June 14, 2005




     A signed original of the written statements required by Section 906 has
been provided to Western Power & Equipment Corp. & Subsidiary and will be
retained by Western Power & Equipment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          21,787
<SECURITIES>                                    37,979
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,473
<ALLOWANCES>                                       588
<INVENTORY>                                        477
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,207
<PP&E>                                          15,412
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,135
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,546
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,916
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,639
<SALES>                                         78,516
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,516
<CGS>                                           13,011
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,773)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,275
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,441
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,834
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,834
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34
        

</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00857-CV

Danita E. ANDERSON,

Appellant

v.

ERIN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT as Assignee of Citibank Platinum Select,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 354484

Honorable Linda F. Penn, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 15, 2011

DISMISSED 

The parties have filed a document titled, “Agreed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” In the 

motion, the parties state they “have resolved all issues related to this action” and “ask the Court 

to dismiss Appellee’s original cause of action” “with prejudice to the refiling of same by either 

party.” The motion is signed by appellant, who is pro se, and by appellee’s attorney of record. 

Based on the joint motion, the intent of the parties is to dismiss not only this appeal but the 

underlying cause of action with prejudice. 
04-10-00857-CV

- 2 -

The motion is granted. All previous orders and judgments, both trial and appellate, are set 

aside and the cause is dismissed with prejudice. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc. 

v. Hughes, 827 S.W.2d 859, 859 (Tex. 1992); Exxon Corp. v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 399, 399 (Tex.

1981); Freeman v. Burrows, 171 S.W.2d 863, 863-64 (1943); Caballero v. Heart of Texas Pizza, 

L.L.C., 70 S.W.3d 180, 181 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2001, no pet.). Costs of appeal are taxed 

against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will 

tax costs against the appellant.”). 

PER CURIAM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address

76.187.22.15,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Case No. 3:22-cv-00769-K

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF JOHN DOE 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, 

LLC hereby gives notice that its claims in this action against Defendant John Doe, subscriber

assigned IP address 76.187.22.15, are voluntarily dismissed without prejudice.

Dated: July 8, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Paul S. Beik

Paul S. Beik

 Beik Law Firm PLLC

 917 Franklin Street, Suite 220

 Houston, Texas 77002

 Tel: (713) 869-6975

 Fax: (713) 583-9169

 paul@beiklaw.com

 www.beiklaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF,

STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC

Case 3:22-cv-00769-K Document 13 Filed 07/08/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 79
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

TARA FARRELL et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NEW MILLENIUM CONCEPTS, LTD.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-00728-M

AMENDED ORDER

The hearing in the above-referenced cause number presently scheduled for August 31, 

2022, at 12:00 p.m. CST is rescheduled and shall be held, instead, on August 31, 2022, at 10:00 

a.m. CST. 

Oral argument is SET for August 31, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. CST. Counsel should convene 

in Courtroom 1570, Earle Cabell Federal Building, 1100 Commerce St., Dallas, Texas, and be 

prepared to argue the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 50), filed by Defendant New Millennium 

Concepts, Ltd.

SO ORDERED.

August 17, 2022.

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

CHIEF JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00728-M Document 56 Filed 08/17/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 820
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AUGUSTA MILLENDER; BRENDA 

MILLENDER; WILLIAM JOHNSON,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; ROBERT

J. LAWRENCE; CURT

MESSERSCHMIDT, No. 07-55518

Defendants-Appellants, D.C. No.

and  CV-05-02298-DDP

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S ORDER

DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF LEROY BACA;

SCOTT WALKER; RICK RECTOR;

DONALD NICHIPORUK; RICHARD

SCHLEGEL; DEPUTY BRICE STELLA;

JACK DEMELLO; DAVID O’SULLIVAN;

JAMES RITENOUR; IAN STADE,

Defendants. 

Filed October 2, 2009

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it

is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit

Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Pregerson did not participate in the deliberations or

vote in this case.

14359
PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
From: Higgins, Cortney <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 7:27 PM 

To: Shine, Brenda; Gillis, Thomas 

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Petroleum Refinery Sector Risk and Technology Review 

and NSPS 

Hi Brenda and Tom, 

Attached is the handout from this meeting. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

-----Original Appointment-----

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Petroleum Refinery Sector Risk and Technology Review and 

NSPS 

When: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:00 AM-11:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). 

Where: Wilson Room, White House Conference Center, 726 Jackson Place, NW 

This meeting was requested by Benjamin Klein, Heather Podesta on behalf of Marathon Petroleum 

Corporation. 

<< 2060AQ75_2014_04_22_PetRefRTR_Marathon_Handout.pdf >>
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MICHAEL RAY FORBES,

BOP Register No. 13302-078,

Plaintiff,

v.

R ZOOK et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-00687-E-BH

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court conducted an independent review of the (i) pleadings; (ii) files and records in 

this case; (iii) Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 

dated April 6, 2022—(Doc. 5); (iv) Supplemental Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of 

the United States Magistrate Judge dated April 22, 2022—(Doc. 9); and (v) Plaintiff’s 

corresponding objections and “amended complaint”—(Docs. 6, 7, 10).

1 The Court reviewed de 

novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection 

was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for 

plain error. The Court has found no error in either (i) the Findings, Conclusions, and 

1 Plaintiff filed a second complaint on April 21, 2022, which (i) the Clerk marked on the docket as an 

“amended complaint” and (ii) did not specifically name institutional Defendants. (Doc. 7). This “amended 

complaint” referred to and incorporated Plaintiff’s original complaint—(Doc. 3)—as the “Tort Claim 

Complaint.” As explained in his objections—(Docs. 6 and 10)—it is unclear whether Plaintiff sought to 

abandon his claims asserted against the institutional Defendants. (See Doc 7.) Nevertheless, the United 

States Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation and corresponding Supplement 

resolve all of Plaintiff’s claims against all Defendants. (See Docs. 5, 9).

Case 3:22-cv-00687-E-BH Document 13 Filed 12/28/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 99
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge or (ii) the Supplemental Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

The Court finds and concludes that both the Findings and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge and Supplemental Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are collectively accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation of the Court. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that (i) the Findings, 

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and (ii) the 

Supplemental Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 

are accepted.

SO ORDERED.

28th day of December, 2022.

___________________________________

ADA BROWN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00687-E-BH Document 13 Filed 12/28/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 100
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Stanadyne Corporation (Stanadyne) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), we, M. David Jones, Chief Executive Officer of Stanadyne, and Stephen S. Langin, Chief Financial Officer of
Stanadyne, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stanadyne.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ M. David Jones      |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen S. Langin  
|M. David Jones          |  |  |  | Stephen S. Langin      
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|March 31, 2008          |  |  |  | March 31, 2008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7482
WILLIE MORRIS MCBRIDE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM BRASWELL, Officer; TIMOTHY S. EVANS, Investigator; R. L. CHUPIK, Investig ator; JONES, J-106; S. I. SQUYRES, Investigator; DAVID K. MAPP, JR., Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Vi rginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-652-3) Submitted: March 3, 1998 Decided: March 20, 1998Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Morris McBride, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McBride v. Braswell , No. CA-96-652-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Rodman & Renshaw Capital Group, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Michael Lacovara, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of
this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Dated: March 14, 2008

|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL
  LACOVARA       
|                             
|Michael Lacovara             
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
(Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000939728
<NAME> RED OAK
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          92,932
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,754,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,129,468
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,973,394
<PP&E>                                         766,391
<DEPRECIATION>                                 376,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,857,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,483,887
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,574
<COMMON>                                        16,013
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,010,716
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,857,142
<SALES>                                     18,215,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,215,872
<CGS>                                       17,668,817
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,668,817
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,835,697
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (1,247,091)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (215,497)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,499,537)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,499,537)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,527,044)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.099)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.099)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3457 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3457

   To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of 
                                 Idaho.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 12, 2013

 Mr. Simpson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of 
                                 Idaho.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO.

    (a) In General.--The President shall appoint, by and with the 
advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional district judge for the 
district of Idaho.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--In order that the table 
contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, will 
reflect the change in the number of judgeships authorized by subsection 
(a), such table is amended by striking the item relating to Idaho and 
inserting the following:

``Idaho....................................................         3''.
 

                                 <all>
```
)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

IN THE TINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOIIN KENNEDY FRENCFI.

Plaintiff.

D. COFFEY ,.ludge,

Defendant Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-0739-C

ORDER

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that this civil action should be dismissed with

prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim.r

The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error

and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation

are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Cou(. For the reasons stated

therein, the Court ORDERS that the above-styled and -numbered civil action be DISMISSED

with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Dated May j3,zozz

S R.C INGS

IOR ED STATES DIS CT JUDCE

rPlaintiffhas failed to file objections to the United States Magistrate Judge's Findings,

Conclusions, and Recommendation and the time to do so has now expired.

l-z

Case 3:22-cv-00739-C-BK Document 8 Filed 05/23/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 209