alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                 JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                             3,589
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  53,589
<PP&E>                                                            89,343
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    56,893
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    86,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          2,457,200
<BONDS>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                          19,580
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (2,390,741)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      86,039
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       0
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 245,025
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                53,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (298,341)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (298,341)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (298,341)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (.02)



</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3621 

To provide for access to health insurance coverage of life-sustaining 

treatments furnished by certain providers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 22, 2013 

Mr. DUFFY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for access to health insurance coverage of lifesustaining treatments furnished by certain providers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROVIDING FOR ACCESS TO HEALTH INSUR4 ANCE COVERAGE OF LIFE-SUSTAINING 

5 TREATMENTS FURNISHED BY CERTAIN PRO6 VIDERS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, in the case of an individual who resides in 

9 a State and who as of December 31 of a year had in effect 

10 health insurance coverage that provided benefits for a lifeVerDate Mar 15 2010 01:28 Nov 27, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3621.IH H3621

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3621 IH

1 sustaining treatment, with respect to a health condition 

2 of such individual, furnished by a provider that before 

3 such date furnished one or more services to such indi4 vidual related to such condition, if— 

5 (1) such coverage for such individual is not con6 tinued for the plan year beginning after such date; 

7 and 

8 (2) there is no health insurance coverage of9 fered in such State that provides for coverage of 

10 such life-saving treatment by such provider; 

11 the individual may enroll in health insurance coverage of12 fered in any other State, which provides for coverage of 

13 such operation by such provider, as if such individual were 

14 a resident of such other State. 

15 (b) LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT DEFINED.—For 

16 purposes of subsection (a), the term ‘‘life-sustaining treat17 ment’’ means, with respect to an individual, any medical 

18 device or procedure, including a drug, ventilator, surgery, 

19 therapy, or artificially provided fluids and nutrients, that, 

20 as certified by the health care provider of such individual, 

21 is required to increase life expectancy of such individual 

22 by restoring or taking over a vital bodily function. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Case 4:22-cr-00066-O Document 17 Filed 03/07/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID 24
Case 4:22-cr-00066-O Document 17 Filed 03/07/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID 25
Case 4:22-cr-00066-O Document 17 Filed 03/07/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID 26
Case 4:22-cr-00066-O Document 17 Filed 03/07/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID 27
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to this Annual Report of Diffusion Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ben Shealy, Senior Vice President – Finance and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







| | /s/ Ben Shealy
Ben Shealy
Senior Vice President – Finance and Treasurer
April 29, 2016
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### PALMERI v. STATE.

No. 24389.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 1, 1949.

No -appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful selling of an alcoholic beverage, wine; the punishment, a fine of $200.

The record is before us without a statement of facts,.in the absence of which the exceptions and objections to the court’s *899charge, as well as special requested charges, cannot be appraised.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3480 

To prohibit entities from using Federal funds to contribute to political 

campaigns or participate in lobbying activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2013 

Ms. TSONGAS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit entities from using Federal funds to contribute 

to political campaigns or participate in lobbying activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Taxpayer Money 

5 for Corporate Campaigns Act of 2013’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3480 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR 

2 CAMPAIGN AND LOBBYING ACTIVITIES. 

3 (a) PROHIBITION.—With respect to Federal funds re4 ceived by an entity, other than a natural person, it shall 

5 be unlawful for such entity to— 

6 (1) use such funds to advocate the election or 

7 defeat of a political candidate; 

8 (2) use such funds for voter registration activi9 ties or get-out-the-vote activities; 

10 (3) use such funds to engage in any lobbying 

11 activity; or 

12 (4) donate such funds to any entity that advo13 cates for the election or defeat of a political can14 didate or engages in lobbying activities. 

15 (b) EXCEPTION FOR ACTIVITIES AUTHORIZED BY

16 LAW.—Subsection (a) does not apply to the use of funds 

17 by an entity for an activity specifically authorized by Fed18 eral law, rule, or regulation. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Power & Equipment Corp. &
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark J. Wright, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                        /s/ Mark J. Wright
                                        -------------------------
                                        Name: Mark J. Wright
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Principal
                                        Accounting Officer
                                        Date: March 14, 2006

     A signed original of the written statements required by Section 906 has
been provided to Western Power & Equipment Corp. & Subsidiary and will be
retained by Western Power & Equipment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L ighthouse Product Services

3937 Cedarwood Lane Johnstown , CO 80 5 34 970

- 313

- 6654 sbaker @lhpsonline.com January 11 , 2011 Office of Pesticide Programs (Inert) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Document Processing Desk (IIAB) Room S

- 4900 , One Potomac Yard 2777 S. Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202 Subject: Petition for the Exemption from Requirement of Tolerance for Kerosene CAS

#8008

- 20

- 6 EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2010

- 0803 Lighthouse Product Services, Regulatory Agent on behalf of Winfield Solutions LLC , is respectfully submitting th is request for "withdrawal without prejudice " of the Petition for the Exemption from Requirement of Tolerance for Kerosene CAS #8008

- 20

- 6 ; EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2010

- 0803

. Further to the withdrawal request we are also asking for a meeting w ith IIAB to discuss the 2006 re - assessment when this ingredient was re

- assessed for use in pesticide formulations for use in animals. We would specifically like your input on what additional data EPA would be looking for in order for us to re

- submit this p etition or one for another alternate, similar solvent. The CPDA Spring meeting will be taking place February 15th

- 17th, we would like to schedule a meeting around that if possible.
Please contact me at 970

- 313

- 6654 or by e

- mail: sbaker@lhpsonline.com if there are any questions or comments concerning this submission.

Sincerely,

Scott Baker Agent for Winfield Solutions LLC
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60737

Summary Calendar

EVIN JOSUE MARQUEZ-CASTILLO

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H HOLDER, JR, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A200 122 168

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Evin Josue Marquez-Castillo, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions

this court for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ affirmance of the

immigration judge’s denial of his request for asylum and withholding of removal.

Marquez has also requested a stay of removal pending this court’s consideration

of his petition for review.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 15, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-60737

See Chen v. Gonzales, 470 F.3d 1131, 1135 (5th Cir. 2006); Eduard v. 1

Ashcroft, 379 F.3d 182, 188 (5th Cir. 2004). 

See Chen, 470 F.3d at 1135. 2

See Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir. 2002). 3

2

Marquez argues that he is entitled to asylum and withholding of removal

because he is a member of a social group, i.e., young people who refuse to pick

sides between or join rival gangs in Honduras. He further argues that he has a

well-founded fear of persecution because the gangs threatened him based on his

refusal to choose sides in the gang conflict. 

As to Marquez’s asylum claim, because harassment and threats do not

qualify as persecution and because Marquez has not shown that any of the

gangs’ actions amounted to persecution, he has not shown that he was subject

to persecution. As a result, Marquez also has not shown that his fear of being 1

beaten or killed on his return to Honduras was objectively reasonable, and thus

he has not established a well-founded fear of future persecution.2

As to Marquez’s withholding of removal request, because Marquez has

failed to prove that he was entitled to asylum, a fortiori he has not shown that

he meets the more stringent standard for proving that he is entitled to

withholding of removal.3

Marquez’s petition for review is DENIED, and his motion for a stay

pending this court’s consideration of his petition for review is DENIED as moot.
Exhibit 23.1









CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-105083) of HepaLife Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiary (a development stage company) ("the Company") of our report dated March 26, 2010, on our audits of the consolidated balance sheets of HepaLife Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended, and for the period from October 21, 1997 (date of inception) to December 31, 2009.





/S/ PETERSON SULLIVAN LLP





Seattle, Washington

March 31, 2010






---
Exhibit 10.7  AMENDMENT TO SERVICES AGREEMENT  This amendment (Amendment) dated as of May 18, 2007 is by and between Barington Capital Group, L.P., a New York limited partnership with an address at 888 Seventh Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10019 (BCG), and Dynabazaar, Inc., a Delaware corporation with an address at 888 Seventh Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10019 (the Company).   RECITALS:  WHEREAS, the Company and BCG are parties to that certain Services Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2004, as amended (the Agreement);  WHEREAS, the Company is party to the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger entered into as of February 26, 2007 by and among the Company, L Q Corporation, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and LQ Merger Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the Merger Agreement);  WHEREAS, the Company believes that it will have sufficient resources following the closing  (the Closing) of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement such that it will no longer be required to receive the administrative services being performed by BCG on behalf of the Company following the Closing; and  WHEREAS, the Company and BCG desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein to provide for the termination of such administrative services provided for under the Agreement following the Closing.  NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants expressed herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:  1. Immediately following the Closing, BCG shall no longer perform for the Company the services set forth in Section 1A of the Agreement and the Company shall no longer have any payment obligations to BCG under Section 3A of the Agreement.  Following the Closing, at the Companys expense, BCG shall transfer to representatives of the Company such books and records of the Company in its possession that the Company shall request.  2. From time to time at the request of the Company, BCG may continue to perform the services set forth in Sections 1B and 1C of the Agreement.     3. This Amendment shall be effective as of the date hereof.  The Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed.  4. This Amendment may be executed by the parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed by their authorized representative as of the date set forth above.  BARINGTON CAPITAL GROUP, L.P. By:  LNA Capital Corp., General Partner   By: /s/ James A. Mitarotonda James A. Mitarotonda Chairman   DYNABAZAAR, INC.  By: /s/ Rory Cowan Rory Cowan Chairman              2
I,
      Edward
      W. Wilhelm, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 29, 2006,
      of
      Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
      that
      the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Borders
      Group, Inc.













Date:
      August 31, 2006







/s/
      Edward W. Wilhelm


Edward
      W.
      Wilhelm


Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Borders
      Group, Inc.
#### HUMPHRIES v. STATE.

No. 25021.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 13, 1950.

None on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of theft of property over the value of Five Dollars, and under the value of Fifty Dollars. The jury assessed his punishment at a fine of $25.and thirty days in the county jail.

There are no bills of exception nor a statement of facts in the record, and the proceedings appear to be regular.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,438,728
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,363,798
<ALLOWANCES>                                   228,594
<INVENTORY>                                    305,192
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,055,625
<PP&E>                                       1,329,250
<DEPRECIATION>                                 808,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,028,005
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,013,648
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          250,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,613,537
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,738,304)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,028,005
<SALES>                                     12,595,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,930,885
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,538,885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,197,136
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             301,348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,122,648)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,122,698)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,122,698)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)
        

</TABLE>
CITY_Of_CORDOV: 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Chief, EAS Division 

· Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

. ~;. 

~: 24 December 2014 

Re: Continuation of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Cordova, Gustavus, Petersburg, 

Wrangell, and Yakutat, Alaska, Dot:;ket OST-.1998~4899 

bear Mr: Schlemmer : 

The purpose of this letter is to voice our strong support for Alaska Airlines continued essential . 

air service to Cordova arid other communities in southeastern Alaska. 

Alaska Air service connects passengers in rural communities to one or more major cities either 

inside the state or thru Seattle. From these hubs, Cordovans can access the airline's extensive 

ratite system and benefit from its marketing relationships with other carriers. The passenger and 

cargo aircraft, which Alaska Airlines proposes to continue using on this route, provides freight, 

mail and cargo capacity that is simply beyond the capabilities of any other carrier. Further, 

Alaska Airlines fleet is equipped with Required Navigation Performance Technology, which 

enables the airline to reliably access the airport during inclement weather, thus reducing 

diversions and cancellations and, in turn, enabling people and products to dependably reach 

Cordova while allowing our citizens and commodities global access. 

Alaska Airlines' service is essential to Cordova's social and economic well-being and we, the 

Mayor and Council of the City of Cordova, whol~heartedly endorse their application to provide 

Essential Air Service to Southeast Alaska. 

Sincerely, 

~~ Jim ~csh . 

Mayor 

n--1" 

fitAV~ Tim Joyce 

Councilor 

CF: City Manager 

Tim Thompson, Alaska Air 

(LviSfJr- (j . KN-~.-

Kristin Carp~er Councilor 

602 Railroad Avenue P.O. Box 1210 Cordova. Alaska 99574 Telephone (907) 424·6200 Fax (907)424·6000