alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0337 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010 - SW - 090 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
#### HALE v. STATE.

No. 22348.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 13, 1943.

Nat Gentry, Jr., of Tyler, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Under his plea of guilty for the unlawful sale of whisky, in a dry area, appellant was assessed a fine of $100.

The record before us is without statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER. CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
APRIL TERM, 1751.

Lib. E. J. No. 13. fol. 637.

#### Stephen Lewis’s Lessee *against*Ninian Beale.

*Dulany*and Gumming, for appellant.

,E. Dorsey, for appellee.

THIS was a writ of inquiry of damages in ejectment. The plaintiff having at a preceding term recovered possession of the land.

By the inquisition returned the Jury assessed the sum of 74/. damages, besides costs of suit. An exception was taken fey the defendant to the inquisition returned; and the Court, onmotion ofthe plaintiff, gaveleave to amend the inquisition, which was accordingly amended by the sheriff, by inserting in the form of the inquisition the following expressions marked in italics, to wit: “ an inquisition indented *(and*“ *taken)*&?c. before me *G. G.*sheriff of *([Frederick County a at the County*aforesaid,) &?c. ( *Twelve good and lawful*“ *men of my bailiwick*;”) hfc. Judgment was entered for damages and costs. The defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals.

At *‘May*Term, 1753, the Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment.
1

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Cameron Michael Moon

Appellate case number: 01-18-01014-CR

Trial court case number: 1467534A

Trial court: 182nd District Court of Harris County

On January 4, 2019, appellant, Cameron Michael Moon, filed his brief in this 

appeal. Appellant has filed a motion to file an amended brief along with his amended 

brief. The motion is granted.

The Clerk of this Court filed appellant’s amended brief on January 7, 2019. The 

State’s brief remains due on January 24, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 31.2(b), 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___January 15, 2019__
p. 1



# OAR Box 1787 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 50 ) ll-C- 8 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/200810:22:19 AM

Sheet 50 of 147P. 2

+<& 0 Sr l * v o rv 

# i$3S ; UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y Offic e o f Ai rQualit yPlannin g an d Standard s Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1 

## 'E--C- 8 

# ©jgnvv ^ May 14 , 199 3
FA X NOT E 1 ; i

Addressee s You ar e invite dt o participat e i n ameetin g on applicability o f ne w sourc e revie w (NSR ) t o pollutio n contro l project s t o b e hel dMa y 26 , 199 3 fro m9:0 0 am- 5:0 0 pm , a t th e Washingto n Duke Inn , 300 1 Camero n Boulevard , Durham , NC
. Pleas e RSV P t o eithe r JoAn n Allma

n a t (919)541-559 1 o r

Larr y Elmor e a t

(919)541-5433 , b y noon , May 17 , 1993
. Observer s ar e welcom

e t o atten dth e meetin g wit h seatin g availabl e o n afirst com e first serve dbasis
. I f

you hav e an y question s concernin g th e meeting , pleas e cal l m e toda y a t

(919)541-5374 , o r

Larr y Elmor e nex t

week
. Pleas e mak e an y arrangement s fo r overnigh t

accommodation s directl y wit h th e Washingto n Duke In n a t

(919)490-099 9 o r

othe r hotel s i n th e area .
Sincerely ,

—U&i- v

Addressee s Dav e Aldorfe r Mar k Carne y Gre g Foot e Davi dHawkin s Ji mJewet t Henr y Nicke l Joh n Pau l • J< J Bill Lamaso n NS RRefor

mProjec t Officer
Pa t Rahe r Lesli e Ritt s Erni e Rosenber g Molly Ros s Donal dTheile r Bill Tyndal l Ro n VanMersberge nP. 3

bcc : Joh n Seit

z Lydi a Wegma

n KentBerr

y Stev e Hitte EdLilli s Le o Stande r Davi d Solomo n Bil l Lamason Larr y Elmor e NS RContact

s
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAYRA CAROLINA GARCIA, aka

Sabrina Michelle Garcia; et al.,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-70729

Agency Nos. A098-953-391

A098-953-392

A098-953-393

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2010** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Mayra Carolina Garcia and her daughters, Vivian Marcela Rivera

Garcia and Katherine Vanessa Rodriguez Garcia, natives and citizens of El

Salvador , petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing

their appeal from an immigration judge’s (IJ) decision denying their application for

FILED

DEC 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-70729

asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against

Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition

for review.

Petitioners contend the Board denied them due process by failing to address

a country report supporting their claim that women and children are mistreated in

El Salvador. There is no clear evidence to rebut the presumption that the Board

considered the evidence in the record. See Kohli v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 1061, 1068

(9th Cir. 2007). Regardless, the Board denied relief based on a failure to establish

a nexus to a protected ground, and the country report is not relevant to that

determination.

We decline to address petitioner’s unexhausted contention that the IJ did not

comply with 8 C.F.R. § 1208.11 by failing to send a copy of the asylum application

to the Department of State for review. Ontiveros-Lopez v. INS, 213 F.3d 1121,

1124 (9th Cir. 2000) (declining to consider a claim that Board did not have first

opportunity to consider).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65865-65866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28099]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c0(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: November 30, 2000.
    Time: 10 AM to 5 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Robert H. Stretch, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5E01, MSC 7510, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6912.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for

[[Page 65866]]

Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 25, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-28099 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# **Exhibit 10.7**

 

 

EXTENSIONAGREEMENT

 

 

Bank of America, N.A.,

as Administrative Agent

231 South LaSalle Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

The undersigned herebyagrees to extend, effective April 3, 2003, its Commitment and the Maturity Dateunder the Credit Agreement dated as of April 3, 2001, among SOURCECORP,Incorporated (formerly known as F.Y.I., Incorporated), each of the Lendersparty thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and Banc ofAmerica Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and sole book agent (as the samehas been amended or otherwise modified from time to time, the “CreditAgreement”) for 364 days to April 1, 2006, pursuant to Section 2.1(d)of the Credit Agreement.  Terms definedin the Credit Agreement are used herein as therein defined.

 

This Extension Agreementshall be construed in accordance with and governed by the law of the State ofTexas.  This Extension Agreement may besigned in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with thesame effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the sameinstrument.

 
| **BANK OF  AMERICA, N.A.** |
|----------------------------|
|                       |   |
| By:                        | /s/Steven A. Mackenzie |
|                       | Steven A. Mackenzie |
|                       | Vice President |

 

 

 

 
| Agreed and Accepted:                            |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                            |
| SOURCECORP, INCORPORATED                        |
|                                            |
| By:                                             |   | /s/Barry L. Edwards |
| Name:                                           | Barry L. Edwards |
| Title:                                          | EVP & CFO |
|                                            |
| BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as  Administrative Agent |
|                                            |   |
| By:                                             |   | /s/Suzanne M. Paul |
| Name:                                           | Suzanne M. Paul |
| Title:                                          | Vice President |

 

 

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3401 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to allow 

a local educational agency that receives a subgrant under section 2121 

of such Act to use the funds to provide professional development activities 

that train school personnel about restorative justice and conflict resolution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2013 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. 

ELLISON, Ms. LEE of California, and Ms. NORTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to allow a local educational agency that receives 

a subgrant under section 2121 of such Act to use the 

funds to provide professional development activities that 

train school personnel about restorative justice and conflict resolution. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restorative Justice in 

5 Schools Act of 2013’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3401 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESTORATIVE JUSTICE TRAINING. 

2 Section 2123(a)(3)(B) of the Elementary and Sec3 ondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6623(a)(3)(B)) 

4 is amended— 

5 (1) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

6 (2) in clause (v), by striking the period at the 

7 end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

8 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(vi) provide training about restora10 tive justice and conflict resolution.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
September 26, 2011 

MEMORANDUM 

From: William H. Maxwell 

EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01) 

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234 

Subject: Meeting with American Electric Power (AEP) and Southern Company 

Attendees: 

EPA

Administrator Jackson, EPA/OA/IO 

Bob Perciasepe, EPA/OA/OES 

Bob Sussman, EPA/OA/IO 

Gina McCarthy, EPA/OAR/OAA/IO 

Michael Goo, EPA/OA/OP/OSEM 

Laura Vaught, EPA/OA/OCIR/OIR 

External

Tom Farrell, Chairman, President & CEO, Dominion; Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Chairman 

Lew Hay, III, Chairman & CEO, NextEra Energy; Edison Electric Institute Vice Chairman 

Gerry Anderson, Chairman, President & CEO, DTE Energy 

Tom Fanning, Chairman, President & CEO, Southern Company 

Mike Morris, Chairman & CEO, American Electric Power 

Tom Kuhn, President, Edison Electric Institute 

Brian Wolff, Senior Vice President, Edison Electric Institute 

Gary Leidich, Executive Vice President, FirstEnergy Corp. 

Discussion: 

See attached.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 EXHIBIT 11.1


                        DIAMOND MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS, INC.

         STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

                (unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED          NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                    SEPTEMBER 30,              SEPTEMBER 30,
                                               ----------------------     ----------------------
                                                 1997          1996         1997          1996
                                               --------      --------     --------      --------
<S>                                              <C>           <C>          <C>           <C>   
Weighted average common shares outstanding
for period                                       34,389        34,290       34,274        34,390

Dilutive employee stock options                      --           640           --           661
                                               --------      --------     --------      --------
Shares used in per share calculations            34,389        34,930       34,274        35,051
                                               ========      ========     ========      ========

Net income (loss)                              ($ 2,553)     $  2,100     ($52,613)     $  8,504
                                               ========      ========     ========      ========

Net income (loss) per share                      ($0.07)        $0.06       ($1.54)        $0.24
                                               ========      ========     ========      ========
</TABLE>


The difference between the calculation of net income (loss) per share calculated
on the primary and fully diluted basis is not material.
**Exhibit 31****CERTIFICATION**I, Robert J. Brilon, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of InPlay Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation;  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: April 2, 2007 By:  /s/ Robert J. Brilon    Robert J. Brilon    Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                                                                  ------------


STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER ORDINARY SHARE
                   (in thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Three Months               Nine Months
                                                             Ending September 30        Ending September 30
                                                               1997       1998             1997      1998
                                                              ------     ------          ------     ------
<S>                                                          <C>         <C>            <C>         <C>
BASIC

Total weighed average ordinary and ordinary equivalent
Shares outstanding                                            40,984     43,944          40,146     43,262
                                                              ======     ======          ======     ======

Net income                                                     4,734      2,877           8,504     14,318
                                                               =====      =====           =====     ======

Net income per Ordinary Share (1)                              $0.12      $0.07           $0.21      $0.33
                                                               =====      =====           =====      =====

DILUTED
Computation of ordinary and ordinary
 equivalent shares outstanding:

Weighted average ordinary shares outstanding                  40,984     43,944          40,146     43,262

Dilutive equivalent ordinary shares issuable upon
exercise of options                                            3,999      2,554           4,101      2,960

Total weighted average ordinary and
ordinary equivalent shares outstanding                        44,983     46,498          44,247     46,222
                                                              ======     ======          ======     ======

Net income                                                     4,734      2,877           8,504     14,318
                                                               =====      =====           =====     ======

Net income per Ordinary Share (1)                              $0.11      $0.06           $0.19      $0.31
                                                               =====      =====           =====      =====
</TABLE>


(1)  On March 9, 1998, the Company effected a two-for-one split of its issued
     and outstanding ADSs. Subsequent thereto, the Company's shareholders
     approved a proposal at the Company's 1998 Annual General Meeting to
     subdivide each of the Ordinary Shares of IR37.5p into four Ordinary Shares
     of IR9.375p (the "Ordinary Share Split"). As a consequence of the Ordinary
     Share Split, effective May 22, 1998, each ADS represents and is
     exchangeable for one Ordinary Share. All share amounts in this exhibit give
     effect to the Ordinary Share Split.
#### KRENEK v. STATE.

No. 22207.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 17, 1942.

E. T. Simmang, Jr., of Giddings, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the County Court on a charge of theft and assessed a penalty of $25.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The pro-.-cedure appears- to be regular and there is nothing presented for the consideration of this court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.