alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION LETTER TO JEFF WILKE
EXHIBIT 10.1





May 16, 2000

Jeff Wilke
1200 12th Avenue South
Suite 1200
Seattle, WA 98144

Re: Special Bonus


Dear Jeff:

As you know, we have tremendous challenge and opportunity ahead of us for the
year 2000 and beyond. I truly appreciate the integral role that you play in our
efforts.

In recognition and appreciation of your contributions, Amazon.com will pay you a
special bonus in the amount of $1,000,000 (One Million Dollars). This bonus will
be paid in equal monthly installments over a one-year period beginning with your
paycheck for May 2000 and will be subject to standard payroll practices and
applicable withholding taxes. If your employment with Amazon.com terminates for
any reason prior to payment of the full bonus, you will forfeit all remaining
payments.

Congratulations!

Sincerely,

/s/ JEFF BEZOS
-----------------------
Jeff Bezos
Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Dallas Division

ROBERT HOPKINS, III, *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

v. * Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-00706 (C)

*

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, *

*

Defendant. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORDER

UPON CONSIDERATION OF Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Future Deadlines, any 

Opposition thereto, and the entire record herein, it is this _______ day of __________, 2023, 

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED.

_______________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00706-E Document 15-1 Filed 05/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 383 Case 3:22-cv-00706-E Document 22-2 Filed 06/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 434
Exhibit 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James A. Mitarotonda, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Dynabazaar, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

       Date: April 2, 2007                  By: /s/ James A. Mitarotonda
                                                --------------------------------
                                                James A. Mitarotonda
                                                Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                                                    ------------


I,  Kent P. Watts,  certify  that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  10-Q  of  Hyperdynamics Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material  fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made,  in  light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [LANGUAGE OMITTED PER RELEASE NO.
34-52492] for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls  and  procedures  to  be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [LANGUAGE OMITTED PER RELEASE NO. 34-52492];

(c)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)  Disclosed  in  this  report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the registrant's most recent
fiscal  quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially
affect,  the  registrant's  internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The  registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our  most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of the registrant's board of
directors  (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant
deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process, summarize and report financial
information;  and  (b)  Any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves
management  or  other  employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.




Date:  December  8,  2005

(signed)  __________________
By:  /s/  Kent  P.  Watts
      Kent  P.  Watts
      Chief  Executive  Officer
#### LEWIS v. STATE.

No. 25507.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 21, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant. George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful sale of whiskey in a dry area, prior convictions being *707alleged for the purpose of enhancing the penalty; the punishment, a fine of $2,000.

Motion for new trial was overruled on February 3, 1951, and the statement of facts was filed in the trial court on February 21, 1951. The statement of facts cannot be considered because it is not signed by the judge Oj. the trial court. In the absence of a statement of facts, we are unable to pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.

There are no bills of exception in the record.

The complaint and information appear regular on their face; and nothing being presented for review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Abgenix, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|March 15, 2005 |  |                                                                                                                             
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  | /s/H. WARD WOLFFH. Ward Wolff
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Abgenix, Inc. and will be retained by Abgenix, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB of Knox Nursery, Inc. (the Company), for the twelve months ended December 31 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce R.
Knox, President and Chief Executive Officer, Secretary & Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my
knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: April 12, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Knox Nursery, Inc. and will be retained by Knox Nursery, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Bruce R. Knox                                
|Bruce R. Knox                                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer            
|Secretary & Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berthel Growth & Income Trust I (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
J. Berthel, Chief Executive Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company Planning, Inc.,
the Trust Advisor of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


May 2, 2003                                 /s/  Thomas J. Berthel
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Thomas J. Berthel
                                                 President and Chief Executive
                                                 Officer
                                                 Berthel Fisher & Company
                                                 Planning, Inc.
                                                 Trust Advisor
                                                 Berthel Growth & Income Trust I
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 333-52814, 333-71228 and 333-101115) pertainingto the 1995 Stock Plan (as amended) and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Catalytica Energy Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 30, 2004, except for the matters described in Note 12, for which the date is February 20, 2004, with respectto the consolidated financial statements of Catalytica Energy Systems, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Phoenix, Arizona 

March 26, 2004
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00465-CR

Francisco Torres

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

379th District Court of Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022CR6702

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 15, 2023
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28720]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Department of Defense Wage Committee; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that closed 
meetings of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held on 
December 5, 2000; December 12, 2000; December 19, 2000; and December 
26, 2000, at 10:00 a.m. in Room A105, The Nash Building, 1400 Key 
Boulevard, Rosslyn, Virginia.
    Under the provisions of section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the 
Department of Defense has determined that the meetings meet the 
criteria to close meetings to the public because the matters to be 
considered are related to internal rules and practices of the 
Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered were 
obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee that 
the data will be held in confidence.
    However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to 
submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed 
to be deserving of the Committee's attention.
    Additional information concerning the meetings may be obtained by 
writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

    Dated: November 3, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-28720 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of LaSalle Hotel Properties (LHO) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jon E. Bortz, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of LHO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LHO.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



February 23, 2005



/s/    JON E. BORTZJon E. BortzChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0 -**  **6302**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appell ee ,
v. PHONEPADITH THADSAMANY , Defendant

– Appell ant .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the West ern District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Frank D. Whitney , District Judge. ( 3: 06

- c r - 001 78

- FDW

- CH

- 4 ; 3:09

- cv - 00332

- FDW )

Submitted : June 24 , 2010 Decided: June 30, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, a nd DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss e d by un publishe d per curiam opinion
. Phonepadith Thadsamany , Appellant Pro Se
. Amy Elizabeth Ray , Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Phonepadith Tha dsamany seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A c ertificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating tha t reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies r elief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently re view ed the record and conclude that Thadsamany has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CHARLES B. STARKE, JR., §

 Plaintiff, §

§

v. § No. 3:22-CV-0835-X-(BH)

§

CITY OF DALLAS, STATE 

OF TEXAS, et al., 

 Defendants.

§

§

§

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge entered Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendations in this case. The Magistrate Judge recommends that this state 

criminal prosecution be remanded to the proper state court because Mr. Starke has 

failed to establish his right to removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1443. 

Mr. Starke objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings by arguing that “pro se 

litigants’ pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as 

lawyers.” [Doc. No. 9.] That is true; however, pro se litigants must still establish 

federal subject-matter jurisdiction over their cases. As the Magistrate Judge 

explained in her thorough report, Mr. Starke failed to establish jurisdiction for 

multiple reasons. For example, Mr. Starke wholly failed to allege that he has been 

denied a federal right arising under a specific law or statute protecting racial 

equality, which is a requirement for removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1443.1 

1 Johnson v. Mississippi, 421 U.S. 213, 219 (1975).

Case 3:22-cv-00835-X-BH Document 10 Filed 09/06/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 26
After a de novo review, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. By separate judgment, the 

plaintiff’s complaint will be remanded to the 291st District Court of Dallas County, 

Texas.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and 

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of September, 2022.

____________________________________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00835-X-BH Document 10 Filed 09/06/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 27
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

SHAWN D. HANSLEY, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 117 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Form 10-K for the Year ended December 31, 2007, pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Omega Protein Corporation, certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Omega Protein Corporation.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 12, 2008



/s/ JOSEPH L. VON ROSENBERG, IIIJoseph L. von Rosenberg, III President and Chief Executive Officer


This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Omega Protein Corporation or the certifying officer for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Omega Protein Corporation and will be retained by Omega Protein Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.