alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

[BORDERS GROUP LOGO]

I, Edward W. Wilhelm, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 25,
2004, of Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Borders Group, Inc.

Date: September 2, 2004

/s/ Edward W. Wilhelm
-------------------------------
Edward W. Wilhelm
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Borders Group, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Borders Group, Inc. and will be retained by Borders Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-4-001]

Take notice that on October 26, 2000, Midcoast Interstate Transmission, Inc. (MIT) filed under protest the following revised tariff sheets to provide for imbalance trading and netting in compliance with the Commission's Order No. 587-L, as reaffirmed by the Commission's October 11, 2000 Order herein. As mandated by Order No. 587-L, the revised tariff sheets are to be effective as of November 1, 2000.

Original Sheet No. 83C

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 84

Third Revised Sheet No. 85

Original Sheet No. 85A

Original Sheet No. 85B

Original Sheet No. 85C

Third Revised Sheet No. 86

MIT states that it is serving copies of the filing upon all its jurisdictional customers and applicable State agencies.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Beginning November 1, 2000, comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-28385 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3553 

To allow a credit against income tax for employers who pay their Federal 

contractor employees compensation lost by reason of the Federal Government shutdown. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2013 

Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To allow a credit against income tax for employers who 

pay their Federal contractor employees compensation lost 

by reason of the Federal Government shutdown. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CREDIT FOR EMPLOYERS WHO PAY FEDERAL 

4 CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION 

5 LOST BY REASON OF SHUTDOWN. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an employer whose 

7 employees provide services to the Federal Government in 

8 an applicable Federal building under a Federal contract, 

9 there shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3553 IH

1 by chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for 

2 the taxable year an amount equal to the sum of the shut3 down payments with respect to employees of the taxpayer 

4 during the taxable year. 

5 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section— 

6 (1) APPLICABLE FEDERAL BUILDING.—The 

7 term ‘‘applicable Federal building’’ means any build8 ing used for official purposes by any office or entity 

9 over which the Committee on House Administration 

10 of the House of Representatives has jurisdiction 

11 under the Rules of the House of Representatives 

12 during the One Hundred Thirteenth Congress. 

13 (2) SHUTDOWN PAYMENTS.— 

14 (A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘shutdown 

15 payments’’ means any payment which is made 

16 by the employer to an individual with respect to 

17 the shutdown period that represents all or a 

18 portion of the wages the individual would have 

19 received from the employer if the individual 

20 were performing services for the employer 

21 under such Federal contract during the shut22 down period. 

23 (B) SHUTDOWN PERIOD.—The term 

24 ‘‘shutdown period’’ means the period of partial 

25 Federal Government shutdown resulting from 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3553 IH

1 the lapse in Federal appropriations beginning 

2 on October 1, 2013, and ending on October 16, 

3 2013. 

4 (c) SPECIAL RULES.—For purposes of this section— 

5 (1) TREATED AS PART OF BUSINESS CREDIT.— 

6 The credit determined under subsection (a) shall be 

7 treated as a credit listed in section 38(b) for the tax8 able year (and not allowed separately under sub9 section (a)). 

10 (d) TERMINATION.—This section shall not apply to 

11 any payments made in any taxable year beginning after 

12 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
MAY TERM, 1738.

#### William Elliott’s Lessee *against*William Osborn.

THIS was an ejectment brought for a tract of land called the Addition, lying on *Kent*Island, in *§>ueen Anne's*County.

At the trial of this cause, the Jury found by special verdict, that on the 6th of *September,*1670, the land in question was granted to *George Goldharwke*and *Alexander Nashg*and their heirs; that the said *Nash*died, and his estate in the land descended to Thomasin, the wife of *William Moulding;*that the said *William*and *Thomasin*conveyed *147the land to the lessor of the plaintiff, by deed bearing date the 17th day of *October,*1732, which was acknowledged in the following manner: “ Memorandum: That on this ° ■* 17th of October, 1732, personally appeared before us the t£ subscribers, being two of his Lordship’s Justices of the 6,£ Peace for the County of *Cecil, William Boulding*and *Tho-*££ *masin*his wife, the within grantors, and the said *Tho-*“ *masin*being by us privately examined out of the hearing “ of her said husband, acknowledged the land and pre“ *“*mises within mentioned to be the right and title of the ££ within mentioned *William*Elliott, his heirs and assigns^ “ and declared she made this acknowledgment willingly “ and freely, without being induced thereto by fears or “ threats of, or ill usage of her husband, or fear of his dis-*a*pleasure. Also the said *William Boulding*acknowledged “ the right and title of the land, and premises within men- “ tioned, to belong to the said *William*Elliott, his heirs and *u*assigns for ever.” That on the 7th September, 1695, a deed was executed, purporting to be a conveyance from *William Boulding*and *Thomasin*his wife, of *Cecil*County, to *Samuel*Osborn, of *Kent*County, to which deed was annexed a power of attorney to *Elias*King, to acknowledge the said deed, which deed, with the power of attorney, was recorded in *Kent*County, and on the records of the same County it appeared, that, “ At a Court held t£ for the said County, the 3d of *March,*1695, Mr. *Elias*i£ *King,*as attorney of *William Boulding*and *Thomasin*his “ wife, doth acknowledge a deed to *Samuel Osborn,*of *H Kent*Island.” That *William Osborn,*the defendant, has been in the actual possession for about fifteen years last past.

The Court gave judgment for the defendant.

Lib. E. J. No. 4. fob 399»
EXHIBIT 3.1a


                     CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                              TO THE

        AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                OF

                     FOODBRANDS AMERICA, INC.

_________________________________________________________________

             Pursuant to Sections 228 and 242 of the
         General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

_________________________________________________________________

          Foodbrands America, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), does hereby certify as follows:

          FIRST:  The name of the corporation is Foodbrands
America, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

          SECOND:  Effective immediately upon filing of this
Amendment and without further action on the part of the
Corporation or its stockholders the provisions of Section 5.1 of
the Corporation's Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation shall be amended as described herein.

          THIRD:  That the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby as follows:

               (i)  Section 5.1(3) is amended by deleting the
last sentence thereof.

               (ii) A new Section 5.1(4) is added to read in its
entirety as follows:

               "(4)  Notwithstanding anything contained herein to
          the contrary, this Article Fifth shall not apply to any
          transaction or series of transactions which the Board,
          in it sole discretion upon the exercise of its
          fiduciary duties in accordance with applicable law,
          determines to be in the best interests of the
          stockholders of the Corporation.  In addition, and in
          any event, this Article Fifth shall not apply to any of
          the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan
          of Merger (the "Merger Agreements"), dated as of March
          25, 1997, by and among IBP, inc. ("IBP"), IBP Sub,
          Inc. and the Company and the Tender Agreements (as
          defined in the Merger Agreement)."

          FOURTH:  That this Amendment has been duly adopted in
accordance with the provisions of Section 242 and 228 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this
Certificate of Amendment to be executed in its corporate name as
of the 28th day of April, 1997.

                              FOODBRANDS AMERICA, INC.



                              By:  /s/ Bryant P. Bynum            
                                 _________________________
                                 Bryant P. Bynum
                                 Vice President - Finance
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Steven P. Hanson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of InPlay Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation;  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                           Date:  March 24, 2008 By:  /s/ Steven P. Hanson    Steven P. Hanson    Chief Executive Officer  
69
EXHIBIT 11

                     BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORPORATION
                         COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (in thousands, except share information)
 

                             For the Three Months        For the Six Months
                                Ended June 30              Ended June 30
                              1997          1996          1997        1996

EARNINGS PER SHARE
Shares of Common Stock:
  Weighted average
    shares outstanding     62,922,046   62,359,936     62,883,222  62,332,841

Net income                 $   11,712   $   13,594     $   26,621   $  29,157

Earnings per share         $      .19   $      .22     $      .42   $     .47


FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Shares of Common Stock:
  Weighted average
    shares outstanding     62,922,046   62,359,936     62,883,222  62,332,841
  Dilutive effect
    of options                110,268      362,128        134,725     315,575
  Dilutive effect of
    contingent shares         453,688      493,498        455,891     493,498
                           __________   __________     __________  __________
Fully Diluted Weighted
  Average Shares
  Outstanding              63,486,002   63,215,562     63,473,838  63,141,914

Net income                 $   11,712   $   13,594     $   26,621   $  29,157

Fully diluted earnings
  per share (1)            $      .18   $      .22     $      .42   $     .46





(1)   Fully diluted earnings per share for the periods presented are not 
      disclosed in the financial statements because the amounts are not 
      considered dilutive under the provisions of Accounting Principles 
      Board Opinion No. 15, "Earnings Per Share."
APRIL TERM, 1764.

#### Proprietary *against*Pearce.

DEBT on an administration bond 5 plea *non est*factum, and issue joined. The bond was dated 17th August, 1727_

The declaration set forth a bond dated 17th June, 1727.

*Garnet*moved to amend the narr. by the bond 1 and to justify the amendment, he cited 1 Barnes, 3.6,7. 2 Barnes, 4. *Cro. Car.*147. Co. *Prac.*26. 3 Lon. 347. *Fitzg.*193. The determination of Courts on matters of practice are, that the Courts have a discretionary power in regulating their own practice. By 12 *Mod.*442. the plaintiff on an amendment may pay costs or grant an imparlance.

*Hollyday*contra.

The Courts will not countenance amendments, where the mistake proceeds from some other cause than accident. In 1 *Stra.*76. 1 *Raym.*189, 190. the reason why amendments were denied, is because the plaintiff had' his deed before him. As to the case in *Barnes*it was owing to the mistake, and in the case in *Levinz,*the amendment was allowed through necessity, the year for beginning the action being passed. There is an election in the defendant to pay costs or have an imparlance. 2 *Stra. 950.*2 Barnes, *58.*

Garnet, in reply.

Amendments are more common now, than when the case in *Raymond*was reported. The declaration there, was good without any amendment, but it is not so here; the necessity of it is apparent. As to the case in 1 *Stra.*76. the question of amendment was not in consideration with the Court, but whether the plaintiff should change his rule from a leave to discontinue, to one to amend.

*224The motion did not prevail, the Chief Justice saying that the defendant would be barred of this defence, it being too late to have an imparlance,

*Jennings’s*notes.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.3

                           PIEDMONT LABORATORIES, INC.
                         FIXED CHARGE RATIO COMPUTATION
                                (GUARANTORS ONLY)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                          ---------------------------------------
                                                            1997           1998            1999
                                                          --------       --------        --------
                                                                  (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                                       <C>             <C>             <C>
Income (loss) before taxes ........................       $   (210)       $ (1,881)       $ (2,252)
   Fixed charges reflected in income (loss) before
      taxes
   Interest expense ...............................          1,275           2,215           2,212
   One third of rental expenses ...................            125             247             172
                                                          --------        --------        --------
Total fixed charges ...............................       $  1,400        $  2,462        $  2,384
                                                          ========        ========        ========

Income (loss) before taxes plus fixed charges above       $  1,190        $    581        $    132
                                                          ========        ========        ========
Fixed charge ratio ................................          0.85x            .24x            .06x
   Fixed charge deficiency ........................       $    210        $  1,881        $  2,252
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

[BORDERS GROUP LOGO]

I, Gregory P. Josefowicz, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July
25, 2004, of Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Borders Group, Inc.

Date: September 2, 2004

/s/ Gregory P. Josefowicz
------------------------------
Gregory P. Josefowicz
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Borders Group, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Borders Group, Inc. and will be retained by Borders Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CAREADVANTAGE,
      INC**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








Pursuant
      to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Dennis J. Mouras, Chief
      Executive Officer and acting principal financial officer of CareAdvantage,
      Inc.
      (the “Company”), hereby certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:May
                15, 2006
              
              
              /s/
                Dennis J. MourasDennis J. Mouras,
                Chief Executive Officer and acting Principal
                  Financial
                  Officer