alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RITA BATES

EDUCATION

HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY, ARCATA, CALIFORNIA

B.S., Biology, 1990. Minor in Botany, emphasis in Ecology. Attendance dates 1986-1990.

EXPERIENCE

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT

AIR QUALITY BUREAU, PLANNING & POLICY SECTION

Section Chief, March 2005 – present

Program Manager (Natural Sciences Manager-2), March 2000 – March 2005

Environmental Specialist, December 1998 – March 2000

Environmental Scientist, August 1998 – December 1998

The Planning & Policy section of the Air Quality Bureau is responsible for the control 

strategy, dispersion modeling, emission inventory and small business assistance programs in 

the Air Quality Bureau. The control strategy section of the Air Quality Bureau is responsible 

for preparing state implementation plans, policies, and regulations for air quality. The 

modeling section ensures that all air dispersion modeling analyses submitted to our agency 

are accurate and complete. The Small Business Assistance Program assists small businesses 

in meeting air quality regulatory requirements.

EMPIRE GROUP, LLC

Empire, Nevada

Environmental Coordinator, June 1996 – July 1998

Empire Group, LLC is the parent company for several entities which own and operate a 

geothermal power plant, an onion and garlic dehydration plant, several ranches, and a garlic 

seed operation. In my position as environmental coordinator, I was responsible for 

permitting at all facilities.

JBR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.

Reno, Nevada

Environmental Analyst IV, Reno Office Coordinator/Manager, July 1994 – July 1996

Environmental Analyst III, July 1993 – July 1994

Environmental Analyst I, June 1990 – July 1993

As the manager of the Reno office, I supervised seven technical staff and one administrative 

employee. During my employment with JBR, I worked on and managed numerous NEPA,

environmental permitting and baseline projects.
#### Thelma Aline WILSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27194.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 24, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin for the State.

*891PER CURIAM.

.The conviction is for the misdemeanor offense of driving a motor vehicle upon a public road while intoxicated; the punishment, three days in jail and a fine of $100.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review by this court.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### BAWCUM v. STATE.

No. 24517.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1949.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for burglary; the penalty assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before this court without a statement of facts or bills of exception. All matters of procedure appear to be in regular form.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 108

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding alcohol use by the Nation’s

youth.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 27, 1993

Mr. GOODLING submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred jointly to the Committees on the Judiciary and the District of

Columbia

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding alcohol use

by the Nation’s youth.

Whereas the misuse of alcohol and other drugs by the Nation’s youth is a major societal problem, and alcohol has

been found to be the drug used most prevalently by high

school seniors and college students;

Whereas surveys have shown that, by 8th grade or 13 years

of age, 70 percent of youngsters have tried alcohol and

27 percent have been intoxicated;

Whereas, in a recent study, funded through a grant made by

the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education and entitled ‘‘Alcohol and Drugs on American College Campuses’’, students less than 21 years of age reported significantly higher alcohol use than older stu-
2

•HCON 108 IH

dents and approximately 41 percent of college students

reported binge drinking (5 or more drinks) within the 2

weeks before the study;

Whereas misuse of alcohol has been linked to medical, social,

psychological, and family problems, as well as crime and

a host of other social ills;

Whereas students less than 21 years of age report a higher

rate of adverse consequences as a result of alcohol use

than do older students, including poor academic performance, vandalism, trouble with authorities, physical injuries, illness, and suicidal thoughts or actions;

Whereas studies have shown that the consumption of alcohol

is inversely related to academic performance, with the

heaviest drinkers obtaining the lowest grades and the

lightest drinkers obtaining the highest grades; and

Whereas, although section 158 of title 23, United States

Code (commonly known as the National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984) resulted in laws in all 50 States

and the District of Columbia prohibiting the sale of alcohol to any person less than 21 years of age, according to

a survey conducted by the National Transportation Safety Board many States still have no laws prohibiting a

person less than 21 years of age from purchasing alcohol,

from attempting to purchase alcohol, from consuming alcohol, from possessing alcohol, from misrepresenting his

or her age to purchase alcohol, or from presenting a false

identification to purchase alcohol: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 States and the District of Columbia should enact com-
3

•HCON 108 IH

1 prehensive laws to prohibit any person who is less than

2 21 years of age from—

3 (1) purchasing alcohol;

4 (2) attempting to purchase alcohol;

5 (3) possessing alcohol in public;

6 (4) consuming alcohol in public;

7 (5) misrepresenting his or her age to purchase

8 alcohol; and

9 (6) using false identification to purchase alco10 hol.

Æ
-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

JEANNE STARR ENTERPRISES, INC. and 

JEANNE STARR GATER

Plaintiffs/Counter-DefendantsAppellants,

UNPUBLISHED

March 1, 2018

v No. 333188

Wayne Circuit Court

MARVIN TOWNS, LC No. 13-016468-CB

Defendant/Counter-PlaintiffAppellee.

Before: JANSEN, P.J., and SERVITTO and SHAPIRO, JJ.

SHAPIRO, J. (concurring).

I concur in the result only.

/s/ Douglas B. Shapiro
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**ESSEX PORTFOLIO, L.P.**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with this annual report of Essex Portfolio, L.P. on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2004 (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Schall, Principal Financial Officer****of Essex Property Trust, Inc., the general partner of theregistrant Essex Portfolio, L.P., hereby certify as of the date hereof, solelyfor purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United StatesCode, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

 
| Date: March 31, 2005 |    /s/ Michael J. Schall |   |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Michael J. Schall                       |
|                      | Senior  Executive Vice President,       |
|                      | Director and  Chief Operating Officer,  |
|                      | Essex Property Trust, Inc.              |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6255
HENRY W. MARTIN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LYNN HECKETT, Doctor; LAWRENCE J. MINETTE, Doctor; BARNWELL MEYER, III, Doctor; JEFFREY MCKEE, Doctor; GENE DIXON, Doctor; ROBERT S. HANSEN, Ph.D.; KARL V. DOSKOCH, Doctor; HERBERT D. SMITH, Doctor; JOSE CHAVEZ, Doctor; DOCTOR GALVARINO; DOCTOR CHAMBERS, Doctor; O. W. WILLIAM, Doctor; V. T. SMITH, Doctor; WILLIAM S. HALL, MD, Psychiatric Institute; JOHN T. GENTRY, Judge; FRANK EPPS, Judge; FRANKIE P. MCGOWAN, Judge; VICTOR PYLE, JR., Judge; GERALD SMOAK, Judge, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-2310-6-OAK) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry W. Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Martin v. Heckett , No. CA-95-2310-6-0AK (D.S.C. Jan. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 99.1




                                  CERTIFICATION

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     I, Wojciech Madalski, as Chief Executive Officer of Netia Holdings S.A.(the
"Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



     (1) the accompanying Form 20-F report for the period ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  June 27, 2003



                                       By:  /S/ WOJCIECH  MADALSKI
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Wojciech Madalski

                                         Chief Executive Officer, President
                                         of the Company
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED) AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 FOR BERTHEL
GROWTH AND INCOME FUND I. THIS SCHEDULE IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,437,434
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,781
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,422,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          374,968
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,931,140<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,422,760
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,131
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               175,952
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,821)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,821)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (33,817)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (52,638)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.99)<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.99)<F3>
<FN>
<F1>NET ASSETS.
<F2>UNREALIZED LOSS (GAIN) ON INVESTMENTS.
<F3>NET INCOME PER BENEFICIAL SHARE BASED ON WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
WHICH WAS 10,541.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41000

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RUBEN PEREZ-BELTRAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-97-CR-116-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 8, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Ruben Perez-Beltran has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
Exhibit
31.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Fred Knechtel, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed
    this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 of Interpace Biosciences, Inc.;                                                                                                                                                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | Based on my knowledge,
    this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
    covered by this report.



|Date: May 29, 2020 | /s/
    Fred Knechtel        
|------------------ | -----------------------------
|                   | Chief Financial Officer      
|                   | (Principal Financial Officer)
#### IRVIN v. SMITH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 13, 1951.

R. E. Lee Murphy, Adolph Graves, Lexington, for appellant.

Sam P. Strother, Lexington, for appellee.

VAN SANT, Commissioner.

The sole question for determination is whether a deed executed in the year 1881 by Mrs. M. F. Sims, a widow, conveyed to Betty Huston a fee simple title or a mere life estate in property located on East Third Street in Lexington. The granting clause of the deed recites that the first party “does hereby sell and convey to the party of the second part (Betty Huston) and her heirs and assigns.” The habendum clause reads: “To have and to hold said property unto said Betty Hüston for and during her natural life with remainder in fee to the children of said Samuel Huston.” The deed recites that Samuel Huston executed his note for the unpaid purchase price and to secure payment of the note a lien was retained on the property.

In many cases we have held that where the granting clause in a deed is repugnant to the habendum clause the former will prevail as against the latter. Two of those cases are relied on by appellant herein to sustain his contention that the fee simple title passed to Mrs. Huston under the deed in question. They are Land v. Land, 172 Ky. 145, 189 S.W. 1, and Hall v. Wright, 121 Ky. 16, 87 S.W. 1129. But in those, as well as all other cases we have examined adhering to the rule relied on, the deeds in question, when read as a whole, either showed an intention to vest the grantee with a fee or failed to show an intention to vest an estate less than the fee in the named grantee. But where the instrument as a whole shows that it was the intention of the parties that the named grantee be vested with a mere life estate, the rule in respect to repugnant clauses does not apply. The *876primary rule in all cases is to construe the instrument according to the intention of the parties, where that intention is expressed in the instrument. Land v. Land, supra; Hall v. Wright, supra; Henderson v. Mack, 82 Ky. 379, 380; May v. Justice, 148 Ky. 696, 147 S.W. 409.

We have no difficulty in determining the intention of the parties in the deed presented for our construction. Samuel Huston, the husband of the named grantee, bound himself to pay the unpaid purchase price of the property and that fact appears in the deed itself. This obligation on the part of the husband no doubt was the consideration moving for the conveyance of the remainder interest in the property to his children. It is apparent that it was the intention of the parties to convey a mere life estate to Mrs. Huston with remainder over to the children of her husband.

The judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 65868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: December 4-5, 2000.
    Time: 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Robert H. Stretch, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5E01, MSC 7510, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6912.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 25, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-28111 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 14 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 14

Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to certain regulations of 
           the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1993

    Mr. Murphy (for himself and Mr. Oxley) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                               and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to certain regulations of 
           the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Whereas it is in the public interest to reduce the frequency of workplace 
        accidents and the human and economic costs associated with such 
        injuries;
Whereas workplace accidents involving powered industrial trucks are often the 
        result of operation by poorly trained, untrained, or unauthorized 
        operators;
Whereas Federal regulations promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health 
        Administration and codified at 29 C.F.R. 1910.178 require that operators 
        of powered industrial trucks be trained and authorized;
Whereas existing regulations lack any guidelines to measure whether operators of 
        powered industrial trucks are in fact trained and authorized;
Whereas operator training programs have been demonstrated to reduce the 
        frequency and severity of workplace accidents involving powered 
        industrial trucks; and
Whereas a petition to amend existing regulations to specify the proper 
        components of a training program for operation of powered industrial 
        trucks has been pending before the Occupational Safety and Health 
        Administration since March 1988: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Occupational Safety and Health Administration is requested to 
publish, within one year of passage of this resolution, proposed 
regulations amending the regulation published as 29 C.F.R. 1910.178 to 
specify the components of an adequate operator training program and to 
provide that only trained employees be authorized to operate powered 
industrial trucks.

                                 <all>
```