alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65829-65830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28069]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of a Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the 
Stony Creek Watershed, Clinton and Ionia Counties, Michigan

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service.

ACTION: Notice of a Finding Of No Significant Impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 65830]]

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969; the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations 
(40 CFR part 1500); and the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
Regulations (7 CFR part 650); the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives notice than an 
environmental impact statement is not being prepared for the Stony 
Creek Watershed, Clinton and Ionia Counties, Michigan.

DATES: Comment will be received until on or before December 4, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan G. Herceg, Assistant State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Michigan State 
Office, 300l Coolidge Road, Suite 250, East Lansing, Michigan 48823-
6350, telephone 517-324-5282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment of this 
federally assisted action indicates that the project will not cause 
significant local, regional, or national impacts on the environment. As 
a result of these findings, Ronald C. Williams, State Conservationist, 
has determined that the preparation and review of an environmental 
impact statement are not needed for this project.
    The project purpose is watershed protection. Project measures 
include the installation of conservation practices by private land 
users to reduce soil and water resource problems. Accelerated financial 
and technical assistance will be available for land treatment.
    The Notice of a Finding Of No Significant Impact has been forwarded 
to the Environmental Protection Agency and to various Federal, State, 
and local agencies and interested parties. A limited number of copies 
of the FONSI are available to fill single copy requests at the above 
address. Basic data developed during the environmental assessment are 
on file and may be reviewed by contacting Alan G. Herceg.

(This activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance under NO. 10.904, Watershed and Flood Prevention, and is 
subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12372, which requires 
intergovernmental consultation with State and local officials.)

    Dated: October 18, 2000.
Ronald C. Williams,
State Conservationist, East Lansing, Michigan.
[FR Doc. 00-28069 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
#### MORRIS v. STATE.

No. 25156.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 21, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Conviction is for giving a check in the sum of $15 with the intent to defraud. Upon a plea of guilty, punishment was assessed at 9 months in the county jail.

There are no bills of exception in the record, and the proceedings appear to be regular.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
[Cite as In re D.A.S.H., 2018-Ohio-2141.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WARREN COUNTY 

IN THE MATTER OF: : CASE NO. CA2018-01-013 

 D.A.S.H. : D E C I S I O N 

 6/4/2018 

 : 

 : 

APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

JUVENILE DIVISION 

Case No.15-D000105 

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, Kirsten A. Brandt, 520 Justice 

Drive, Lebanon, OH 45036, for appellee 

Aaron Aldridge, 130 East Mulberry Street, Lebanon, OH 45036, for appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript 

of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the 

Warren County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, and upon the brief filed by 

appellant's counsel. 

{¶2} Counsel for appellant, A.T., has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review 

of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court 
Warren CA2018-01-013 

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; 

(2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine 

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for 

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both 

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason 

that it is wholly frivolous. 

S. POWELL, P.J., RINGLAND and HENDRICKSON, JJ., concur.
Take notice that on January 28, 2000, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing a report that compares its cash-out revenues with cash-out costs for the annual billing period November 1, 1998 through October 1, 1999.

Texas Gas states that the filing is being made in accordance with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's December 16, 1993, “Order on Third Compliance Filing and Second Order on Rehearing” in Docket Nos. RS92-24, et al. There is no rate impact to customers as a result of this filing.

Texas Gas states that copies of this filing have been served upon all of Texas Gas’s jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before February 9, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-2789  Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3534 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3534

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 113 West Michigan Avenue in Jackson, Michigan, as the ``Officer 
                 James Bonneau Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFICER JAMES BONNEAU MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 113 West Michigan Avenue in Jackson, Michigan, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Officer James Bonneau Memorial Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Officer 
James Bonneau Memorial Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Order entered February 11, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-01054-CV

RETAIL SERVICES WIS CORPORATION D/B/A 

PRODUCT CONNECTIONS, ET AL., Appellants

V.

CROSSMARK, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-05122-2020

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s February 10, 2021 unopposed motion for an 

extension of time to file its brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and 

ORDER the brief tendered to this Court by appellee on February 9, 2021 filed as 

of the date of this order.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
.fAk2-D \0 ~Ol3 \

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

09/29/06

Organization

Kational Business Airc-rafi Association

Regional Airline Association

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association

AT.-\.

Person Contacted

Eli Cotti

Dave L.otterer

Robert Hackman

Craig Fabian

Date Response
Case 1:22-cr-00021-P-BU     Document 26     Filed 08/16/22      Page 1 of 2     PageID 49

Case 1:22-cr-00021-P-BU     Document 26     Filed 08/16/22      Page 2 of 2     PageID 50
#### HENDRY v. HENDRY.

No. 9960.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

April 4, 1951.

Rehearing Denied April 25,1951.

W. S. Leslie, San Angelo, for appellant.

O’Neal Dendy, San Angelo, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee filed suit against appellant for divorce and for partition of their community property. In this suit a receiver was appointed to take charge of and hold, during the pendency of the suit, a certain post office check for the sum of $2,475, which check is admitted to be community property. Subsequent to the appointment of the receiver, and his qualifying as such, ■appellee filed his motion alleging that he was an invalid, was unable to secure employment, was in destitute circumstances and owed debts. He prayed that the motion be set down for hearing and that appellant and the receiver be notified to appear and show cause why he should not be allowed the sum of $276 out of the post office check and that he be paid the further sum of not less than $25 per month during the pend-ency of the suit. This motion was set down for hearing, notices of the hearing were served, appellant answered, a hearing was •had and the court entered the following order: “It is therefore, the order and judgment of the court that the receiver, Lloyd Hendry, be and he is hereby authorized and directed to reduce said post office check which he now hold - for the benefit of the plaintiff and defendant to cash, and that after so doing he deliver to the plaintiff the sum of $200.00 immediately, and that he likewise, if the defendant so requests deliver to her the sum of $200.00, and that he hold the remaining funds in his hands as such receiver for further orders of this court.”

This appeal questions the authority of the trial court to enter the above order.

Article 4636, Vernon’s Ann.'Civ.St., provides: “Pending suit for a divorce the court, or the judge thereof, may make such temporary orders respecting the property and parties as shall be deemed necessary and equitable.”

Even though the above order is directed to the receiver, a third party, it is none the less a temporary order respecting the parties and their property authorized by Art. 4636, supra. It is an interlocutory order, and since there is no statute which authorizes this attempted appeal, this court *822is without jurisdiction further than to dismiss the appeal on our own motion. Pioneer American Ins. Co. v. Knox, Tex.Civ. App., 199 S.W.2d 711, Writ of Er. Ref.

The appeal is dismissed.
SEPTEMBER TERM, 1722.

Lib. P. L. No. 7. fol. 103.

#### Lord Proprietary *against*Edward Wright.

THIS was an action of debt on a sheriff’s bond. Performance of conditions was pleaded. Replication that the sheriff ought to make due return of all writs and process, &c. That he returned a writ of attachment so negligently that it was quashed, and the plaintiff obliged to pay costs. Rejoinder. That the said sheriff was not obli*50ged to return the said writ of attachment, or any other writs, process or warrants, to him directed, in due form of law; that he returned the writ according to the best of his power, skill, and knowledge, and traverses the negligence.

Dulany, Attorney-General.

*Howard*and Bordley, for defendant.

Special Demurrer. That the rejoinder is no answer, the traverse immaterial and improper, and the conclusion improper. That the matter contained in the rejoinder is such as no issue can be taken upon, and it is uncertain, insufficient, &c. (See 2 *Harris’s*Entries, 574. for the re - plication and other pleas at length.)

Judgment on the demurrer for the Lord Proprietary. ,
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 25 (Monday, February 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2843]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Notice of Transmittal of Sequestration Preview Report for Fiscal 
Year 2001 to the Congress and the Office of Management and Budget.

    Pursuant to section 254(b) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 904(b)), the Congressional Budget 
Office hereby reports that it has submitted its Sequestration Preview 
Report for Fiscal Year 2001 to the House of Representatives, the 
Senate, and the Office of Management and Budget

Dan L. Crippen,
Director, Congressional Budget Office.
[FR Doc. 00-2843 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0070-02-M
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3608 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3608

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Act of October 19, 1973, concerning taxable income to 
  members of the Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Grand Portage Band Per Capita 
Adjustment Act''.

SEC. 2. EQUAL TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PER CAPITA INCOME FOR PURPOSES OF 
              FEDERAL ASSISTANCE.

    Paragraph (4) of section 7 of the Act of October 19, 1973 (25 
U.S.C. 1407(4)) is amended by striking ``pursuant to the agreements of 
such Band'' and inserting ``or the Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior 
Chippewa Indians, or both, pursuant to the agreements of each Band''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3608

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Act of October 19, 1973, concerning taxable income to 
  members of the Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians.
```
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 20 14 - 0364 Directorate ID : 20 13 - SW - 041 - AD Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters (Previously Eurocopter France) Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 938 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect a crack in the pitch horn to prevent failure of the pitch horn, loss of the anti - torque function, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 1,946 Labor per Helicopter ( .1 work hour to visually inspect a pitch horn x 

### $ 8 5 /work
- hour for the inspection . 1 work hour to dye -penetrant inspect a pitch horn and 1 work hour to replace a part, if necessary. ) $ 8.50 per helicopter to do the visual inspection $85 per he licopter to do a dye - penetrant $85 to replace a part

Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 178.50 or $2,031 if a part is replaced Total US Fleet Cost $ 1,905,078 if all the pitch horns were replaced. Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be consi dered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Robert Grant
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 215 (Monday, November 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28409]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Elementary, Secondary and Informal 
Education; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), The National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Elementary, Secondary and 
Informal Education (#59).
    Date/Time: December 7, 2000; 4:30 pm to 9 pm. December 8, 2000; 
8 am to 6 pm. December 9, 2000; 8 am to 3 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Susan Snyder, Program Director, Division of 
Elementary, Secondary and Informal Education, The National Science 
Foundation, Room 885, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA, 22230 
(703) 292-8620.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the Teacher Enhancement and 
Instructional Materials Development Program for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature including 
technical information, financial data such as salaries, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.


    Dated: October 27, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-28409 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-1-M.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 214 (Friday, November 3, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66168-66169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28291]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 2000-ASW-18]


Revision of Class D Airspace, Robert Gray Army Airfield, TX; and 
Revocation of Class D Airspace, Hood Army Airfield, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 66169]]

SUMMARY: This notice confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
which revises the Class D Airspace at Robert Gray Army Airfield, TX. 
and revokes the Class D Airspace at Hood Army Airfield, TX.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct final rule published at 65 FR 54950 is 
effective 0901 UTC, November 30, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air 
Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, 
Fort Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 817-222-5593.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on September 12, 
2000, (65 FR 54950). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure 
for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be 
no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public 
that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written 
adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an 
adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the 
regulation would become effective on November 30, 2000. No adverse 
comments were received and, thus, this action confirms that this direct 
final rule will be effective on that date.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on October 27, 2000.
Robert N. Stevens,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 00-28291 Filed 11-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF DATASTREAM SYSTEMS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Datastream Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Larry G. Blackwell, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ LARRY G. BLACKWELLLarry G. BlackwellChief Executive OfficerDatastream Systems, Inc.Date: November 8, 2005