alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of J.W., A Child

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 0 0 932

- CV

Trial court case number: 201 7

- CI

- 23182

Trial court: 1 31st District Court of Bexar County

On March 4, 201 9 , appellant filed appellant’s brief. Appellee had a briefing deadline of April 3 , 201 9 in which to file a brief, but no brief has been filed . On April 10 , 201 9 , we notified appellee that we would set the case for submission without an ap pellee’s brief unless appellee filed (1) a motion to extend time to file the brief or (2) a brief accompanied by a motion to extend time. Appellee has neither filed a motion to extend time or an appellee’s brief. Accordingly, the case is hereby set at is sue.

The time for filing the APPELLEE’S brief has expired. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 38.6(b). Further, appellee’s deadline for responding to the notice issued by this Court on April 10 , 201 9

, requiring appellee to file either a brief or a motion to extend t ime to file a brief, has expired. Accordingly, this case is now at issue and ready to be set for submission. We overrule appellant’s

motion to set the case at issue as moot.

.
It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Sherry Rad ack

_____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ July 2, 2019

___
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3441 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the Marine Gunnery 

Sergeant John David Fry scholarship to include spouses of members 

of the Armed Forces who die in the line of duty, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2013 

Ms. TITUS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the Marine 

Gunnery Sergeant John David Fry scholarship to include 

spouses of members of the Armed Forces who die in 

the line of duty, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Spouses of Heroes 

5 Education Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3441 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF MARINE GUNNERY SERGEANT JOHN 

2 DAVID FRY SCHOLARSHIP. 

3 (a) EXPANSION OF ENTITLEMENT.—Subsection 

4 (b)(9) of section 3311 of title 38, United States Code, is 

5 amended by inserting ‘‘or spouse’’ after ‘‘child’’. 

6 (b) LIMITATION AND ELECTION ON CERTAIN BENE7 FITS.—Subsection (f) of such section is amended— 

8 (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para9 graph (4); 

10 (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol11 lowing new paragraphs: 

12 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—The entitlement of an indi13 vidual to assistance under subsection (a) pursuant to 

14 paragraph (9) of subsection (b) because the indi15 vidual was a spouse of a person described in such 

16 paragraph shall expire on the earlier of— 

17 ‘‘(A) the date that is 15 years after the 

18 date on which the person died; and 

19 ‘‘(B) the date on which the individual re20 marries. 

21 ‘‘(3) ELECTION ON RECEIPT OF CERTAIN BENE22 FITS.—A surviving spouse entitled to assistance 

23 under subsection (a) pursuant to paragraph (9) of 

24 subsection (b) who is also entitled to educational as25 sistance under chapter 35 of this title may not re26 ceive assistance under both this section and such 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3441 IH

1 chapter, but shall make an irrevocable election (in 

2 such form and manner as the Secretary may pre3 scribe) under which section or chapter to receive 

4 educational assistance.’’; and 

5 (3) in paragraph (4), as redesignated by para6 graph (1), by striking ‘‘that paragraph’’ and insert7 ing ‘‘paragraph (9) of subsection (b)’’. 

8 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3321(b)(4) 

9 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘an individual’’ and inserting ‘‘a child’’. 

11 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall take effect on the date that is 90 days 

13 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### BROWN v. STATE.

No. 22795.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 15, 1944.

Rehearing Denied April 26, 1944.

M. E. “Gates, of Iiuntsville, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of killing his father, Sidney Brown, punishment being assessed at twenty-five years in the penitentiary.

A number of bills of exception are found in the record. Some are incomplete, and none of them seems to present a serious question.

Apparently appellant and his wife had separated and she was living with her two small children in a house which she had rented. The killing occurred just in front of this house. Neighbors heard appellant curse his father and tell him to get up and put his clothes on, which deceased did, and stepped out of the house and told some of the neighbors to call the officers, that something had to be done with appellant. In a few minutes a shot was fired and deceased was killed. Appellant claimed that he killed his father because he caught deceased and appellant’s wife in a compromising position which led him to believe that they had already engaged in an act of intercourse, or were about to do so. It would accomplish no good purpose to detail the evidence at length. Appellant’s evidence brought the case under Art. 1220, P. C., which justifies a killing “when committed by the husband upon one taken in the act of adultery with the wife, provided the killing take place before the parties to the act have separated.”

The trial court gave a liberal and comprehensive charge upon the defensive issue. Evidently the jury discredited appellant’s story.

Finding no reversible error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant has filed a motion for a rehearing but he fails to point out any error or oversight committed by this court in the original opinion, nor does he present any matter not heretofore discussed by us. Under the circumstances stated, there is nothing presented for review.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7740

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HAFEEZ ODOFFIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:16-cr-00049-RAJ-LRL-4; 4:19-

cv-00040-RAJ)

Submitted: April 29, 2020 Decided: June 5, 2020

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hafeez Odoffin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Hafeez Odoffin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2018). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). When the district court denies relief on the merits, 

a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Odoffin has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
----

----

----

|   | TELTRONICS, INC.,a Delaware corporation                                 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                    |   |
|   |                                                                    |   |
|   |                                                                    |   |
|   | By:                                                                     | /s/ Angela L. Marvin |
|   | Name:                                                                   | Angela L. Marvin |
|   | Title:                                                                  | CFO |
|   |                                                                    |   |
|   |                                                                    |   |
|   |                                                                    |   |
|   | WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, INC.,a California corporation,as Agent and Lender |
|   |                                                                    |   |
|   |                                                                    |   |
|   |                                                                    |   |
|   | By:                                                                     |   /s/ Tiffany Ormon    |
|   | Name:                                                                   |   Tiffany Ormon |
|   | Title:                                                                  |   Vice President |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7575
ERIC DEWITT DUNSEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus FRANK C. SIZER, JR., Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA98-3011-PJM) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric Dewitt Dunsen, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Eric Dunsen seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Dunsen v. Sizer , No. CA-98-3011-PJM (D. Md. Sept. 18, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE01753

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
EXHIBIT 21



Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                                                          |  |                                            |  |                     |  
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------- | -
|                                                          |  | State or OtherJurisdiction ofIncorporation |  | PercentageOwnership |  
|Parent                                                    |  |                                            |  |                     |  
|BCSB Bankcorp, Inc.                                       |  | United States                              |  |                     |  
|                                                          |  |                                           
|Subsidiary (1)                                            |  |                                            |  |                     |  
|Baltimore County Savings Bank, F.S.B.                     |  | United States                              |  | 100                 | %
|BCSB Bankcorp Capital Trust I                             |  | Delaware                                   |  | 100                 | %
|BCSB Bankcorp Capital Trust II                            |  | Delaware                                   |  | 100                 | %
|                                                          |  |                                           
|Subsidiaries of Baltimore County Savings Bank, F.S.B. (1) |  |                                            |  |                     |  
|Ebenezer Road, Inc.                                       |  | Maryland                                   |  | 100                 | %

---

|(1) | The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report to Stockholders attached hereto as
Exhibit 13.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berthel Growth & Income Trust I (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
J. Berthel, Chief Executive Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company Planning, Inc.,
the Trust Advisor of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


May 10, 2004                            /s/  Thomas J. Berthel
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                             Thomas J. Berthel
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        Berthel Fisher & Company Planning, Inc.
                                        Trust Advisor
                                        Berthel Growth & Income Trust I
Slip Op. 07- 81

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC.

f/k/a ROCKWELL AUTOMATION/

ALLEN-BRADLEY CO., LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant.

Before: Richard K. Eaton, judge

Court No. 03-00007

JUDGMENT

Upon consideration of the parties' response to the court's

Opinion and Order of May 7, 2007 (Slip Op. 07-67), it is hereby

ORDERED that the subject merchandise identified on the

commercial invoices as "short body timer" model numbers 700-

HR52TA17B; 700-HR52TU243; 700-HRC12TA173; 700-HRC12TU24B; 700-

HRM12TU24B and 700-HRM12TA17B is classified under Harmonized

Tariff Schedule of the united States ("HTSUS") subheading

8536.49.00; and it is further

ORDERED that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall

re-liquidate the subject entries reflecting that the above-listed

short body timers be classified under HTSUS subheading 8536.49.00

and pay refunds to plaintiff, together with interest as provided

by law.

Dated: May 22, 2007

New York, New York

ISI Richard K. Eaton

Judge
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and furnished herewith pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Axeda Systems Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 2, 2005 (the Report), the undersigned, Robert M. Russell Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Karen
F. Kupferberg, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 2, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert M. Russell Jr.                           
|                   |  |     |  | Robert M. Russell Jr.                               
|                   |  |     |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer   
|                   |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                       
|                   |  |    
|Dated: May 2, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Karen Kupferberg                                
|                   |  |     |  | Karen F. Kupferberg                                 
|                   |  |     |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer   
|                   |  |     |  | and Treasurer                                       
|                   |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer)



This certification is made solely for
the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Axeda Systems Inc. and will be
retained by Axeda Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3554 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to designate certain medical facilities 

of the Department of Veterans Affairs as health professional shortage 

areas, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2013 

Mr. BRALEY of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to designate certain 

medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs 

as health professional shortage areas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Access to 

5 Care Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3554 IH

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF MEDICAL FACILITIES OF THE DE2 PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AS 

3 HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SHORTAGE AREAS. 

4 (a) HPSA.—Section 332(a)(1) of the Public Health 

5 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254e(a)(1)) is amended in the sec6 ond sentence by inserting ‘‘and medical facilities of the 

7 Department of Veterans Affairs (including State homes, 

8 as defined in section 101(19) of title 38, United States 

9 Code)’’ after ‘‘(42 U.S.C. 1395x(aa)),’’. 

10 (b) CONCURRENT BENEFITS.— 

11 (1) SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM.—Section 338A(b) 

12 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l(b)) 

13 is amended— 

14 (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘and’’; 

15 (B) in paragraph (4), by striking the pe16 riod and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

17 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

18 paragraph: 

19 ‘‘(5) not be participating in the Department of 

20 Veterans Affairs Health Professionals Educational 

21 Assistance Program under chapter 76 of title 38, 

22 United States Code.’’. 

23 (2) DEBT REDUCTION PROGRAM.—Section 

24 338B(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

25 U.S.C. 254l–1(b)) is amended— 

26 (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3554 IH

1 (B) in paragraph (3), by striking the pe2 riod and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

4 paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(4) not be participating in the Department of 

6 Veterans Affairs Health Professionals Educational 

7 Assistance Program under chapter 76 of title 38, 

8 United States Code.’’. 

9 (c) CONSULTATION.—In carrying out the National 

10 Health Service Corps Program under subpart II of part 

11 D of title III of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

12 254d et seq.), the Secretary of Health and Human Serv13 ices shall consult with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

14 with respect to health professional shortage areas that are 

15 medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs 

16 (including State homes, as defined in section 101(19) of 

17 title 38, United States Code). 

18 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall take effect on the date that is 90 days 

20 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 215 (Monday, November 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66548-66549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28338]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel Teleconference Review of 1 R13 
application.
    Date: December 6, 2000.
    Time: 11:00 a.m to 12:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant application.
    Place: 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E01, Rockville, MD 20852, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jon M. Ranhand, PhD, Scientist Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health, and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5E0#, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6884.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864,

[[Page 66549]]

Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 30, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-28338 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M