alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2844]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-475-821]


Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Italy: Rescission of Countervailing 
Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY:  Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION:  Notice of Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  On October 28, 1999, in response to a request from 
respondents, the Department of Commerce initiated an administrative 
review of the countervailing duty order on stainless steel wire rod 
from Italy. The review covers the period January 1, 1998 through 
December 31, 1998. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 
Department is now rescinding this review because the respondents have 
withdrawn their request for review.

EFFECTIVE DATE:  February 8, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Eric B. Greynolds, AD/CVD 
Enforcement, Group II, Office VI, Import Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, Room 4012, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone (202) 482-2786.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 30, 1999, the Department 
received a request for an administrative review of the countervailing 
duty order on stainless steel wire rod from Italy from Accaiaerie 
Valbruna S.r.l. and Accaiaerie di Bolzano SpA (respondents), for the 
period January 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998. On November 4, 1999, 
the Department published in the Federal Register (64 FR 60161) a notice 
of ``Initiation of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review'' 
initiating the administrative review. On November 15, 1999, respondents 
withdrew their request for review.
    The applicable regulation, 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), states that if a 
party that requested an administrative review withdraws the request 
within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation 
of the requested review, the Secretary will rescind the review. In this 
case, respondents have withdrawn their request within the 90 day 
period. No other interested party requested a review, and we have 
received no other submissions regarding respondents' withdrawal of its 
request for review. Therefore, we are rescinding this review of the 
countervailing duty order on stainless steel wire rod from Italy 
covering the period January 1, 1998, through December 31, 1998.
    This notice is published in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: January 27, 2000.
Holly A. Kuga,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-2844 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Boardof Trustees 

LaSalle Hotel Properties: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-156451, 333-158617, and 333-163296) and on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-158873, 333-125058, 333-104056, 333-86911, and 333-72265) of LaSalleHotel Properties of our reports dated February 25, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of LaSalle Hotel Properties as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cashflows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear inthe December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of LaSalle Hotel Properties. 

KPMG LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

February 25, 2010
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

MITCHELL RYAN ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

v. ) 

 ) Case No.: 4:21-cv-01075-P 

GRAPEVINE COLLEYVILLE 

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL 

DISTRICT and JORGE RODRIGUEZ 

in his official capacity as GCISD 

School Board President

) 

) 

) 

) 

 Defendants. ) 

 ) 

DEFENDANTS’ APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF THEIR RESPONSE 

TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 

Joseph F. Cleveland, Jr. 

State Bar No. 04378900 

jcleveland@belaw.com 

Sarah S. Flournoy 

State Bar No. 24036575 

sflournoy@belaw.com 

BRACKETT & ELLIS P.C. 

100 Main Street 

Fort Worth, Texas 76102-3090 

Telephone: (817) 338-1700 

Facsimile: (817) 870-2265 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS 

GRAPEVINE COLLEYVILLE 

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT and 

JORGE RODRIGUEZ in his official capacity 

as School Board President 

Case 4:21-cv-01075-P Document 13 Filed 09/23/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID 58
2 

INDEX 

EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION

A Affidavit of Paula Barbaroux 

A-1 GCISD BED(LEGAL) 

A-2 BED(LOCAL) 2008 

A-3 BED(LOCAL) Current 

A-4 BED(LOCAL) 2004

A-5 GF(LEGAL) and (LOCAL) 

A-6 Plaintiff Ryan – July 26, 2021 Request 

A-7 Plaintiff Ryan – August 23, 2021 Request 

A-8 2018 Request Form 

A-9 Secretary Remarks – Open Forum 

 

Case 4:21-cv-01075-P Document 13 Filed 09/23/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID 59
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was 

forwarded this 23rd day of September, 2021, by United States mail, postage prepaid 

via certified mail, return receipt requested, to all counsel of record as shown below 

pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: 

Tony McDonald Via: Email 

tony@tonymcdonald.com 

1501 Leander Dr., Ste. B2 

Leander, TX 78641 

/s/ Joseph F. Cleveland, Jr. 

Joseph F. Cleveland, Jr. 

1282520-v2/7613-001000 

Case 4:21-cv-01075-P Document 13 Filed 09/23/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID 60
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gasel Transportation Lines Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I,
Michael J. Post, President, Treasurer and Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

Date: May 16, 2005


                                          /s/ Michael J. Post
                                          --------------------------
                                          Michael J. Post, Treasurer
                                          & Chief Executive Officer
# Euroopa Liidu C 379/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 379 |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 57. köide25. oktoober 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 379

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

57. köide25. oktoober 2014

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Teave |
| | TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT |
| | Euroopa Komisjon |
| 2014/C 379/01 | Euro vahetuskurss | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

IV   Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

2014/C 379/01

Euro vahetuskurss

1

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

IV Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

| 25.10.2014 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 379/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2014

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 379/1

---

Euro vahetuskurss (1)

24. oktoober 2014

2014/C 379/01

1 euro =

| | Valuuta | Kurss |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | USA dollar | 1,2659 |
| JPY | Jaapani jeen | 136,64 |
| DKK | Taani kroon | 7,4452 |
| GBP | Inglise nael | 0,78870 |
| SEK | Rootsi kroon | 9,1881 |
| CHF | Šveitsi frank | 1,2060 |
| ISK | Islandi kroon | |
| NOK | Norra kroon | 8,3400 |
| BGN | Bulgaaria leev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Tšehhi kroon | 27,695 |
| HUF | Ungari forint | 308,65 |
| LTL | Leedu litt | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Poola zlott | 4,2235 |
| RON | Rumeenia leu | 4,4230 |
| TRY | Türgi liir | 2,8332 |
| AUD | Austraalia dollar | 1,4396 |
| CAD | Kanada dollar | 1,4191 |
| HKD | Hongkongi dollar | 9,8206 |
| NZD | Uus-Meremaa dollar | 1,6116 |
| SGD | Singapuri dollar | 1,6158 |
| KRW | Korea vonn | 1 338,21 |
| ZAR | Lõuna-Aafrika rand | 13,8878 |
| CNY | Hiina jüaan | 7,7426 |
| HRK | Horvaatia kuna | 7,6730 |
| IDR | Indoneesia ruupia | 15 286,41 |
| MYR | Malaisia ringit | 4,1496 |
| PHP | Filipiini peeso | 56,690 |
| RUB | Vene rubla | 53,1330 |
| THB | Tai baat | 41,025 |
| BRL | Brasiilia reaal | 3,1541 |
| MXN | Mehhiko peeso | 17,1406 |
| INR | India ruupia | 77,4541 |

Valuuta

Kurss

USD

USA dollar

1,2659

JPY

Jaapani jeen

136,64

DKK

Taani kroon

7,4452

GBP

Inglise nael

0,78870

SEK

Rootsi kroon

9,1881

CHF

Šveitsi frank

1,2060

ISK

Islandi kroon

NOK

Norra kroon

8,3400

BGN

Bulgaaria leev

1,9558

CZK

Tšehhi kroon

27,695

HUF

Ungari forint

308,65

LTL

Leedu litt

3,4528

PLN

Poola zlott

4,2235

RON

Rumeenia leu

4,4230

TRY

Türgi liir

2,8332

AUD

Austraalia dollar

1,4396

CAD

Kanada dollar

1,4191

HKD

Hongkongi dollar

9,8206

NZD

Uus-Meremaa dollar

1,6116

SGD

Singapuri dollar

1,6158

KRW

Korea vonn

1 338,21

ZAR

Lõuna-Aafrika rand

13,8878

CNY

Hiina jüaan

7,7426

HRK

Horvaatia kuna

7,6730

IDR

Indoneesia ruupia

15 286,41

MYR

Malaisia ringit

4,1496

PHP

Filipiini peeso

56,690

RUB

Vene rubla

53,1330

THB

Tai baat

41,025

BRL

Brasiilia reaal

3,1541

MXN

Mehhiko peeso

17,1406

INR

India ruupia

77,4541

---

(1)  Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

---
#### J. B. OSBORNE, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 12, 1951.

Hiram H. Owens, Barbourville, for mo-vant.

A. E. Funk, Atty. Gen. and W. Owen Keller, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the Commonwealth.

. PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied. Judgment affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31**

 

CAREADVANTAGE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 

 

CERTIFICATIONS 

 

I, Dennis J. Mouras, Chief Executive Officer and acting Principal Financial Officer of CareAdvantage, Inc. certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of CareAdvantage, Inc.; 

 

2.    Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4.    The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluatedthe effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in thisreport any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation to the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which could adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:    May 13, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,469
<SECURITIES>                                    20,086
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,890
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,815
<PP&E>                                           5,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,247
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,307
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,042
<SALES>                                         15,670
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,570
<CGS>                                              206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,066<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 669
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,810)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       465
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,275)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,275)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.97)<F2>
<FN>
<F1>IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION OF LOR/GESKE BOCK ASSOCIATES, INC., THE
COMPANY RECOGNIZED A ONE-TIME EXPENSE AMOUNTING TO $7.1 MILLION OF IN PROCESS
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
<F2>IN THE FIRST NINE MONTHS OF 1996, COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENTS, IF INCLUDED, WOULD
HAVE AN ANTI-DILUTIVE EFFECT ON THE NET LOSS PER SHARE CALCULATION, AND ARE
THEREFORE EXCLUDED FROM THE FULLY DILUTED CALCULATION.  IF INCLUDED, THE NET
LOSS PER SHARE WOULD BE $0.91 PER SHARE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3534 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 113 West Michigan Avenue in Jackson, Michigan, as the ‘‘Officer James Bonneau Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3534 EH

1 SECTION 1. OFFICER JAMES BONNEAU MEMORIAL POST 

2 OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 113 West Michigan Avenue in 

5 Jackson, Michigan, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Officer James Bonneau Memorial Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Officer James 

11 Bonneau Memorial Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3534 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostBonneau Memorial Post Office’’. in Jackson, Michigan, as the ‘‘Officer James al Service located at 113 West Michigan Avenue
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains Summary Financial Information extracted from
the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets and condensed
consolidated statements of operations filed with Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 1998, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000939730
<NAME>                        Expert Software, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         2,356
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,705
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,574)
<INVENTORY>                                    2,458
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,862
<PP&E>                                         4,052
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,147)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,043
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       76
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,773
<SALES>                                        5,020
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,020
<CGS>                                          2,765
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  9,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,342
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,475)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,731
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,206)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,206)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.21)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

PETER BEASLEY, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § No. 3:22-cv-00532-X-BT

§

GREGORY GREENLEE et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY AND OTHER DEADLINES

In its discretion, the Court finds good cause to GRANT Defendants’ Motion 

to Stay Discovery (ECF No. 79) and ORDERS that all unexpired deadlines 

pertaining to the completion of discovery and the filing of dispositive motions set 

forth in the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order (ECF No. 51) are hereby STAYED 

pending disposition of Defendants’ Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the 

pleadings (ECF No. 78). Primesource Bldg. Prod., Inc. v. Lee Grp. Int’l, Inc., 2020 

WL 6140462, at *1 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 12, 2020) (Starr, J.) (“A district court has broad 

discretion and inherent power to stay discovery for good cause until preliminary 

questions that may dispose of the case are determined.”) (quoting Fujita v. United 

States, 416 F. App’x 400, 402 (5th Cir. 2011) (quotation marks omitted).

The Court has made a “cursory examination” of Defendants’ Rule 12(c) 

motion and finds that the arguments are not frivolous and merit serious 

consideration. If Defendants’ arguments are valid, all of Plaintiff’s claims may be 

dismissed with prejudice. Further, because Plaintiff does not need any discovery 

Case 3:22-cv-00532-X-BT Document 90 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1525
to respond to Defendants’ Rule 12(c) motion, a temporary stay of discovery will not 

unduly delay the litigation. 

The Court will enter an amended scheduling order setting forth new 

deadlines for the completion of discovery and the filing of dispositive motions, if 

appropriate, after the District Court considers the undersigned’s anticipated 

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation on Defendants’ 12(c) motion. 

In view of this stay, Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant Rondalynne 

McClintock to be Deposed (ECF No. 77) is DENIED without prejudice. Also, 

Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 81) is MOOT, and is hereby 

terminated as such.

SO ORDERED.

January 17, 2022.

____________________________

REBECCA RUTHERFORD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00532-X-BT Document 90 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1526
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Power & Equipment Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark J. Wright, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




                                                /s/ Mark J. Wright
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Name: Mark J. Wright
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                Date: February 27, 2004



     A signed original of the written statements required by Section 906 has
been provided to Western Power & Equipment Corp. and will be retained by Western
Power & Equipment Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.