alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*District Judge of the Southern District of Texas, sitting

by designation.

 

**Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-10079

_____________________

ALAN NIEDERLITZ; PEGGY NIEDERLITZ,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

PRESTONWOOD GOLF CLUB CORP., Doing

Business as Prestonwood Country Club,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:94-CV-2395)

_________________________________________________________________

October 11, 1996

Before KING and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges, and LAKE*,

District Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

The district court entered judgment against Prestonwood Golf

Club Corp., defendant-appellant, following a jury verdict in

favor of Alan Niederlitz and Peggy Niederlitz, plaintiffsappellees, in their suit against Prestonwood for violations of

the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq..
2

Prestonwood appeals, arguing that the jury instructions were

flawed and that the evidence was insufficient to support the

jury’s finding of liability under the FCRA. We are not persuaded

that the charge as a whole created substantial and ineradicable

doubt as to whether the jury was properly guided in its

deliberations. The district court did not err in failing to

grant judgment as a matter of law for Prestonwood following the

return of the verdict. The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         377,059
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,088,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                    65,019
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,172,495
<PP&E>                                      11,184,721
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,044,326
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,828,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,793,408
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,100,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,960,029
<SALES>                                     16,503,323
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,503,323
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,407,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             708,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (613,294)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (217,852)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (395,442)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of the Oregon Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 10 a.m. and adjourn at 2 p.m. on November 9, 2000, at the Sweetbrier Inn, Board Room, 7125 SW Nyberg Road, Tualatin, Oregon 97062. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the background and the method of conducting a law enforcement Committee project. 

Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation to the Committee, should contact Philip Montez, Director of the Western Regional Office, 213-894-3437 (TDD 213-894-3435). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting. 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC, October 27, 2000. 

 Lisa M. Kelly, 

Special Assistant to the Staff Director, Regional Programs Coordination Unit. 

[FR Doc. 00-28066 Filed 10-27-00; 4:20 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
# .fAk2-D \0 ~Ol3 \
Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 09/29/06



### Organization Kational Business Airc-rafi Association Regional Airline Association Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association AT.-\. 

### Person Contacted Eli Cotti Dave L.otterer Robert Hackman Craig Fabian Date Response
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 211 (Tuesday, October 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27885]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: November 6-7, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 am to 2:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Georgetown Holiday Inn, Fortune Room, 2101 Wisconsin 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20007.
    Contact Person: Dianne E. Tingley, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID, NIH, Room 2220, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7610, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7610, 301-496-2550.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 18, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-27885 Filed 10-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,210,814
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,031,164
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,241,978
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,985,311
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,105,380
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (38,044)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,985,311
<SALES>                                        136,908
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               641,504
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               140,152
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             346,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                154,832
<INCOME-TAX>                                   154,832
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            154,832
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   154,832
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   154.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   154.83
        

</TABLE>
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 29, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00706

- CV

RONALD J. BIBB, JR. AND LEYONN P. SIMELT ON , Appellants
V. 423 COLONY, LTD. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380

- 01777

- 2020

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Carlyle, and Goldstein

Opinion by Justice Myers Before the Court is appellants’ motion to di smiss the appeal because the

parties have settled their differences. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1( a)(1).

220706f.p05 /Lana Myers/ / LANA MYERS JUSTICE– 2

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

RONALD J. BIBB, JR. AND LEYONN P. SIMELTON, Appellants

No. 05

- 22

- 00706

- CV V.

423 COLONY, LTD., Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380

- 01777

- 2020. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices Carlyle and Goldstein participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 29 th day of August

, 2022

.
EXHIBIT 32.2



PC MALL, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PC Mall, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Theodore
R. Sanders, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                       
|-----------------------
|November 8, 2005       
|                       
|/s/ Theodore R. Sanders
|Theodore R. Sanders    
|Chief Financial Officer
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, DC 20590

Application to Amend

Section 333 Exemption No. 14834

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-5747

March 19th 12, 2016

Petitioner:

Denison Yacht Sales, Inc.

850 Northeast 3rd Street

Dania Beach, FL 33004

Cell: 954-646-4435

Email: floridadronepros@gmail.com

Greetings,

By letter from the FAA dated August 16th, 2015 an Exemption 333 was granted to Denison Yacht Sales, 

Inc. for relief under Section 333. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption No. 14834 Regulatory 

Docket No. FAA-2015-5747. 

Denison Yacht Sales, Inc. hereby requests that the exemption so granted be amended to include DJI 

Phantom 4 models. Relevant facts and reasoning are:

 DJI has announced they will discontinue the Phantom 2 model which was approved in Denison 

Yacht Sales, Inc. Exemption No. 14834.

 Size, weight and performance specification of the DJI Phantom 4 (“P4”) are substantially similar 

to those of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ (“P2”) and Phantom 3 (P3) in all relevant respects:

PHANTOM	4	Specs:

Weight	(Including	Battery)

Max	Ascent	Speed 6	m/s	(Sport	mode)

Max	Descent	Speed 4	m/s	(Sport	mode)

Max	Speed 20	m/s	(Sport	mode)

Max	Service	Ceiling	Above	Sea	Level 19685	feet	(6000	m)

Max	Flight	Time Approx.	28	minutes

Operating	Temperature	Range 32°	to	104°	F	(0°	to	40°	C)

Satellite	Systems GPS	/	GLONASS

Hovering	Accuracy Vertical:	

+/- 0.1	m	(when	Vision	Positioning	is	active)	or	+/-0.5	m

Horizontal:	

+/- 0.3	m	(when	Vision	Positioning	is	active)	or	+/-1.5	m

o

 The findings, rationale and conclusions contained in the FAA’s Exemption No. 14834 apply 

without modification to this application to include the DJI Phantom 4 model in Exemption No. 

14834.
Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any additional 

information that is required.

Sincerely,

Lee Borkowski / Representative 

Denison Yacht Sales, Inc.

850 Northeast 3rd Street

Dania Beach, FL 33004

Cell 954-646-4435
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Christopher J. Willi, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (s)1350, as adopted pursuant to (s)906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal yearended July 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)  The information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of SherwoodBrands, Inc.

 

Date: October 28, 2003

 

 
| /s/      CHRISTOPHER  J. WILLI |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Christopher  J. Willi                                        |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer                                     |   |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 13.1

           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 333-123470, No. 333-123468 and No. 333-85944) pertaining to the
DataMirror Corporation Stock Option Plan, DataMirror Corporation Executive
Stock Compensation Plan and DataMirror Corporation Share Purchase Plan of our
report dated March 4, 2005 [except as to note 21, which is as of March 22,
2005], with respect to the consolidated financial statements of DataMirror
Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 20-F), for the year ended
January 31, 2005.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of DataMirror
Corporation included on page 100 of the Annual Report (Form 20-F). This
schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial
statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.


Toronto, Canada                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
April 22, 2005                                           Chartered Accountants
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dana L. Dabney, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Circle Group Holdings,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report my conclusions  about the  effectiveness
of the  disclosure  controls and  procedures  based on my  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on my most recent  evaluation,  to the  registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's  board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were  significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.

Date:  October 25, 2006
                                                       /S/  DANA L. DABNEY
                                                       --------------------
                                                       Dana L. Dabney
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
#### BRANHAM v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 22, 1953.

John S. Cary, Burkesville, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Zeb A. 'Stewart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

CAMMACK, Justice.

Clarence Branham is appealing from a judgment sentencing him to two years in prison on a charge of uttering a forged writing. The principal ground urged for reversal is that the trial court erred in forcing Branham into trial over his objections the day following the date on which the indictment was returned.

Branham had been indicted at an earlier term for uttering a cold check in the amount of $10. This constituted a misdemeanor. He was arrested, released on bond and his trial set for the 4th day of the 1952 November (November 20th) term. On November 19th, the grand jury returned an indictment charging Branham with uttering a cold check in an amount which constituted a felony.

The judgment recites that, when the case was called on November 20th, both sides announced ready for trial. However, the bill of exceptions, which was approved by the trial court, sets forth that, upon the calling of the case, counsel for Branham asked for a continuance on the ground that he was not ready -for trial.

Section 185 of the Criminal Code of Practice provides that if the defendant be in custody, or on bail, when the indictment is found, or be summoned or arrested three days before the time fixed for the trial, the trial may take place at the same term of the court, at a time to be fixed by the court. Obviously, that section of the Code was not followed in the case at bar. Likewise there is a conflict in the recitation in the judgment that both parties announced ready and in the statement of the bill of exceptions which was approved by the trial court to the effect that Branham’s counsel asked for a continuance.

Under the circumstances, we think the judgment should be and it is reversed.