alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,057
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,597
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     72,269
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        394,755
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 502,761
<DEPOSITS>                                     331,996
<SHORT-TERM>                                    99,702
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,110
<LONG-TERM>                                     33,929
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 471,737
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 24,939
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,884
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   209
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                28,032
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,116
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,876
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,156
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    (628)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  33
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,575
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,170
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.44
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       508
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,600
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      195
<RECOVERIES>                                        57
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,600
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 65879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28173]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Partial Consent Decree Under the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on October 19, 2000, a proposed Partial 
Consent Decree in United States v. American Scrap Company, et al., 
Civil Action No. 1:99-CV-2047, was lodged with the United States 
District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
    In this action the United States seeks the reimbursement of 
response costs in connection with the Jack's Creek/Sitkin Smelting 
Superfund Site in Mifflin County, Pennsylvania (``the Site''), pursuant 
to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability 
Act (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq. The Partial Consent Decree 
resolves the United States' claims against Industrial Steel & Pipe 
Supply Company, J. Sepenuk & Sons, Inc., and Kingsport Iron & Metal 
Co., Inc. for response costs incurred as a result of the release or 
threatened release of hazardous substances at the Site. These parties 
will pay the United States $140,000.00. The Partial Consent Decree will 
not resolve the United States' claims against the remaining defendants 
in the litigation.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Partial 
Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney 
General of the Environmental and Natural Resources Division, Department 
of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044, and should refer to 
United States v. American Scrap Company, et al., D.J. Ref. 90-11-2-911/
1.
    The Partial Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, Middle District of Pennsylvania, Federal 
Building, 228 Walnut Street, Suite 220, Harrisburg, PA 17108, or at the 
Region III Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 1650 Arch 
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. A copy of the Partial Consent 
Decree may also be obtained by mail by requesting a copy from the 
Department of Justice Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, 
Washington, DC 20044-7611. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check 
in the amount of $9.00 (36 pages at 25 cents per page reproduction 
cost) payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Bruce Gelber,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environmental and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-28173 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
## NO. 12

- 0 9

- 00 23 9

- C V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JOSE B. DE LA CERDA

, APPEL L ANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 87 T H

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

SU Z AN VAUGHN

, ' ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINIO N

Jose B. De La Cerda appeals the trial court’s summary judgment order in favor of

Suzan Vaughn. In one issue

, De La Cerda argues that the trial court ’ s summary judgment

order should be reversed. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

J URISDICTION

De La Cerda seek s direct appeal of the trial court’s order granting summary

judgment in regard to any claims against Vaughn. However, Vaughn was one of many

defendants in the suit. The trial court’s summary judgment order disposed only of any

claims against V aughn. The record reflects that the claims against the other defendants

remain active.

As a general rule, a direct appeal may be taken only from a final judgment.

Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). In order to be final and

appeala ble, a judgment must dispose of all issues and parties in the case. Id. A summary

judgment, unlike a judgment signed after a trial on the merits, is presumed to dispose of

only those issues expressly presented, not all issues in the case. City of Beaumont v.

Guillory

, 751 S.W.2d 491 , 492 (Tex. 1988). “ A summary judgment that fails to dispose

expressly of all parties and issues in the pending suit is interlocutory and not appealable

unless a severance of that phase of the case is ordered by the trial court ; in the absence of

an order of severance, the party against whom an interlocutory summary judgment has2

been rendered has his right of appeal when and not before such partial summary

judgment is merged in a final judgment disposing of all parties and issue s. ” Id.

The summary judgment order signed by the trial court in the case at hand

expressly stated that it disposed of De La Cerda’s claims against Vaughn

. The order did

not address the remaining defendants. Nor does the record reflect that any other

def endant had sought summary judgment. Further, De La Cerda’s claims against Vaughn

have not been severed from his claims against the other defendants to the suit

. See id.

Theref ore, the summary judgment order is interlocutory. See id. Accordingly, the ord er

is not appealable, and we have no jurisdiction to review it. 1

D ISPOSITION

Because we have no jurisdiction to review the order in question , the appeal is

dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

BRIAN HOYLE

__ Justice

Opinion delivered August 11 , 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

1 We note the existence of certain statutory exceptions that allow for the direct appeal of an

interlocutory summary judgment order. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 51.014 (Vernon 2008).

However, those exceptions are not applicable to this case. See id.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Andrew C. Johannesen, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Omega Protein Corporation; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: April 29, 2016 | By:    | /s/Andrew C. Johannesen      | 
|-------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------- | 
|                     | Name:  | Andrew C. Johannesen         | 
|                     | Title: | Executive Vice President and | 
|                     |        | Chief Financial Officer      |
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010 filed with Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jerry Treppel, Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the
      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented.




Date:
      July 7, 2010
              /s/ Jerry TreppelJerry
      Treppel, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer





This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Elite Pharmaceuticals Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 214 (Friday, November 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28303]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 103000D]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION:  Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Spiny Dogfish 
Monitoring Committee will hold a public meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Friday, November 17, 2000, from 10 
a.m. until 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held at the Comfort Inn at the Airport 
(Providence), 1940 Post Road, Warwick, RI; telephone: 401-732-0470.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, Room 
2115, 300 S. New Street, Dover, DE 19904.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Daniel T. Furlong, Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; telephone: 302-674-
2331, ext. 19.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following agenda items will be 
discussed: Update current stock status, yield estimates based on F= 
0.027 and current stock size, review 2000-01 measures and fishery 
performance, recommended management measures for 2001-02.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically identified in this notice and any issues 
arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action 
under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's 
intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Joanna Davis at the Council office (see 
ADDRESSES) at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: October 31, 2000.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 00-28303 Filed 11-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3510-22-S
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 21

- 00529

- CR

Manuel M. AYALA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR9405

Honorable Frank J. Castro , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED December 6, 2023.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-17-00383-CV 

In re Max Grossman § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Original Proceeding 

From the 384th District Court 

of El Paso County (2017-DCV-2528) 

December 7, 2017 

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered Relator Max Grossman’s petition for writ of 

injunction. We grant Relator’s petition. Accordingly, it is ordered that the 

temporary injunction placed by the El Paso Court of Appeals and then clarified in 

its second amended emergency order of September 12, 2017 shall remain in 

effect during the pendency of the interlocutory appeal (02-17-00384-CV). 

It is further ordered that Real Party in Interest the City of El Paso shall pay 

all of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth 

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,834
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,239
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,598
<INVENTORY>                                      1,363
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,160
<PP&E>                                          45,485
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,897
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,178
<BONDS>                                         23,094
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,686
<SALES>                                          3,550
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,243
<CGS>                                            2,657
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,073
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (69)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   439
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 534
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,790
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,715
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,075
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,075
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                               CAREADVANTAGE, INC
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, I, Dennis J.
Mouras, Chief Executive Officer and acting principal financial officer of
CareAdvantage, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that (i) the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and (ii) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 14, 2004                          Dennis J. Mouras
                                             ----------------------------
                                             Dennis J. Mouras, Chief
                                             Executive Officer and acting
                                             Principal Financial Officer

                                       19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STANADYNE
AUTOMOTIVE CORP'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,132
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,064
<ALLOWANCES>                                       500
<INVENTORY>                                     36,560
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                92,019
<PP&E>                                         140,517
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 321,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,438
<BONDS>                                        150,383
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   321,916
<SALES>                                        307,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               307,053
<CGS>                                          251,730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  292,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (106)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,581
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,687)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,687)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 190 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3343 

[Report No. 113–267] 

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to clarify the rules 

regarding the determination of the compensation of the Chief Financial 

Officer of the District of Columbia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 28, 2013 

Ms. NORTON (for herself and Mr. ISSA) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

NOVEMBER 15, 2013 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


EMCDONALD on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3343 RH

A BILL 

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to clarify 

the rules regarding the determination of the compensation of the Chief Financial Officer of the District of 

Columbia. 


EMCDONALD on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3343 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF DETERMINATION OF COM4 PENSATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

5 OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. 

6 (a) DETERMINATION OF COMPENSATION.—Section 

7 424(b)(2)(E) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act 

8 (sec. 1–204.24(b)(2)(E), D.C. Official Code) is amended 

9 to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘(E) PAY.—The Chief Financial Officer 

11 shall be paid at a rate such that the total 

12 amount of compensation paid during any cal13 endar year does not exceed an amount equal to 

14 the limit on total pay which is applicable during 

15 the year under section 5307 of title 5, United 

16 States Code, to an employee described in sec17 tion 5307(d) of such title.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to pay periods be20 ginning on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 


EMCDONALD on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 190 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3343 

[Report No. 113–267] 

A BILL 

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act 

cer of the District of Columbia. of the compensation of the Chief Financial Offito clarify the rules regarding the determination 

NOVEMBER 15, 2013 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


EMCDONALD on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS