alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         118,584
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,727,503
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,664,932
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,497,981
<PP&E>                                          24,516
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,973,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,543,182
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       504,494
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,726,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,973,736
<SALES>                                      1,768,155
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,768,155
<CGS>                                        1,045,215
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,045,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               478,414
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                208,526
<INCOME-TAX>                                    58,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            150,526
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   150,526
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) ORBIT
TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPT. 30, 1996 AND
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPT. 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              53
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    59
<PP&E>                                             348
<DEPRECIATION>                                      38
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4160
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         10
<COMMON>                                           204
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3920)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       454
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    15
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1102)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1102)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1102)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     9
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                  3,603
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                  7,048
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                        4,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>            31,002
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                 40,365
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                   40,365
<LOANS>                               162,766
<ALLOWANCE>                             1,122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        255,066
<DEPOSITS>                            201,773
<SHORT-TERM>                                0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                    13,233
<LONG-TERM>                                 0
<COMMON>                                  265
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                             39,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>        255,066
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         6,791
<INTEREST-INVEST>                       1,682
<INTEREST-OTHER>                            0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                        8,473
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                      4,076
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      4,076
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   4,397
<LOAN-LOSSES>                              80
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                        377
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         2,965
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         2,060
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>              2,060
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,542
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            1.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                            1.75
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                           8.11
<LOANS-NON>                               182
<LOANS-PAST>                              480
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                          139
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                        1,249
<CHARGE-OFFS>                             221
<RECOVERIES>                               14
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                       1,122
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                    1,122
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                         0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                     0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1123]

      ( print page 66232)    
Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas,*                     the West Virginia Economic Development Authority, grantee of FTZ 229, has requested authority on behalf of Toyota Motor Manufacturing West Virginia, Inc. (TMMWV), operator of FTZ 229A, at the TMMWV automobile engine manufacturing plant in Buffalo, West Virginia, to expand the scope of authority to include the manufacture of automobile transmissions under FTZ procedures within Subzone 229A (FTZ Doc. 52-99, filed 10-25-99);                 

*Whereas,*                     notice inviting public comment was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (64 FR 59160, 11-2-99);                 

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the application is in the public interest;                 

*Now Therefore,*                     the Board hereby approves the request subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including § 400.28.                

Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of October 2000.

Troy H. Cribb,

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

Dennis Puccinelli,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-28286 Filed 11-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JoAnne Downey, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 298 C.D. 2016

:

Unemployment Compensation :

Board of Review, :

Respondent :

O R D E R

NOW, January 4, 2017

, upon consideration of petitioner’s

application for re consideration and respondent’s no

- answer letter in response

thereto , the application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

President Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Circle Group Holdings, Inc. on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Gregory J.
Halpern, Chief Executive Officer of the Circle Group Holdings, Inc. certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                 (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                 (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of Circle Group Holdings, Inc.

Dated:  March 31, 2005                     /s/ Gregory J. Halpern
                                           ----------------------
                                           Gregory J. Halpern
                                           Chairman of the Board, President and
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 41035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16583]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

    The National Civilian Community Corps Advisory Board gives notice 
of the following meeting:

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, July 16, 2013, 2:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m. (ET).

PLACE: Conference Room 8312, 8th Floor, Corporation for 
National and Community Service Headquarters, 1201 New York Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20525.

CALL-IN INFORMATION: This meeting is available to the public through 
the following toll-free call-in number: 888-456-0335 conference call 
access code number 7475. Kate Raftery will be the lead on the call. Any 
interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the 
meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls they initiate 
over wireless lines, and the Corporation will not refund any incurred 
charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they initiate over 
land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number. Replays are 
generally available one hour after a call ends. The toll-free phone 
number for the replay is 800-871-1327, replay passcode 1657. The end 
replay date: August 16, 2013, 10:59 p.m. (CT).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
I. Meeting Convenes
     Call to Order, Welcome, and Preview of Today's Meeting 
Agenda
     Introduction & Acknowledgements
II. Approval of Previous Meeting's Minutes
III. Director's Report
IV. Program Reports
     Projects and Partnerships
     Policy and Operations
     20th Anniversary Plans
     Member Development
V. Public Comment
VI. Special Recognition
     Resolution--3 Board Members

ACCOMMODATIONS: Anyone who needs an interpreter or other accommodation 
should notify the Corporation's contact person by 5:00 p.m. Friday, 
July 12, 2013.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Erma Hodge, NCCC, Corporation for 
National and Community Service, 9th Floor, Room 9802B, 1201 New York 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20525. Phone (202) 606-6696. Fax (202) 606-
3459. TTY: (800) 833-3722. Email: ehodge@cns.gov.

     Dated: July 3, 2013.
Valerie E. Green,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-16583 Filed 7-5-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-P
```
#### LULING OIL & GAS CO. v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO.

No. A-193.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Oct. 11, 1944.

Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman & Bates and C. W. Bell, all of Houston, Geo. Cannon, of San Antonio, and Bryan, Suhr & Bering and E. H. Suhr, all of Houston, for plaintiff in error.

W. J. Howard, K. W. Gilmore, Rex G. Baker, and R. E. Seagler, all of Houston, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

It appears that this application for writ of error was ’ granted under a misunderstanding of the status of the case. Upon original hearing the Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause with instructions. However, on motion for rehearing the original judgment was withdrawn and in lieu thereof the following judgment was entered:

“On this day came on to be heard the motions for rehearing, filed both by appellant and by appellee, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was error in its original judgment, entered the 1st. day of March, 1944, in one respect only, that is in reversing the cause ás a whole, it is now, upon rehearing, adjudged that such order of reversal be withdrawn, and that, instead this Court hold the cause in abeyance here, and that the trial court be directed to correct its error in disregarding the appellant’s pleas of limitation and to rehear the same and try out the issues therein raised upon the facts; and that, on return to this Court of the trial court’s findings, conformable both to this Court’s original opinion and to the opinion this day filed, this Court take further procedure herein; it is further ordered that this Court’s original judgment in all other respects remain undisturbed.”

It is manifest that the case is still pending in the Court of Civil Appeals. Its order of reversal has been withdrawn and the cause held by it in abeyance. Until that court renders a final judgment disposing of the case same cannot be brought to this Court by writ of error. Art. 1739, R.C.S.1925, Rule 467, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

While we have acquired no jurisdiction of the case and can enter no effective order therein except an order dismissing the application for writ of error, still in view of the contentions urged here, and as further action in the case must be taken by the Court of Civil Appeals, we deem it not improper to point out that we do not agree with the construction given by that court to Rule 434. We construed that rule in Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n v. Lightfoot, 139 Tex. 304, 162 S.W.2d 929, and pointed out that since it was but a bringing forward and readoption of old Rule 62a, it should be given the construction theretofore given to that rule. In that opinion we expressly held that Rule 434 *701did not authorize the Court to try an indivisible cause of action piecemeal.

The order heretofore entered granting a writ of error in this case is set aside and in lieu thereof it is ordered that respondent’s motion to dismiss the application for want of jurisdiction be granted.

Application for writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Gilbert M. Martinez, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 1615 C.D. 2018

:

Tax Claims Bureau, Director Stacy :

Phile, in her Individual Capacity, the :

Treasurer Dennis Adams, in his :

Individual and Official Capacity and :

Berks County Assessment Office :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, October 2, 2019, upon consideration of Appellant’s

application for reconsideration, the application is denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3592 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require a jobs score 

for each spending bill considered in Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2013 

Mr. CICILLINE (for himself, Mr. LANCE, Mr. MCDERMOTT, and Mr. RIBBLE) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to 

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require 

a jobs score for each spending bill considered in Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jobs Score Act of 

5 2013’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3592 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET 

2 ACT OF 1974. 

3 Section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 

4 (2 U.S.C. 653) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’; 

6 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period and 

7 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

8 (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(4) an estimate of the number of jobs which 

11 would be created, sustained, or lost in carrying out 

12 such bill or resolution in the fiscal year in which it 

13 is to become effective and in each of the 4 fiscal 

14 years following such fiscal year, together with the 

15 basis for each such estimate, and to the extent prac16 ticable, the analysis shall include regional and State17 level estimates of jobs that would be created, sus18 tained, or lost.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 11.1

                       INCARA PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                      (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Three Months Ended        Nine Months Ended
                                                   June 30,                  June 30,
                                            ---------   ----------   ----------   ----------
                                              1999        1998          1999        1998
                                            ---------   ----------   ----------   ----------
<S>                                         <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>
Net loss per Unaudited Consolidated
   Statements of Operations                 $ (4,119)   $ (10,189)   $ (16,416)   $ (17,341)
                                            =========   ==========   ==========   ==========

Weighted average of common shares
   and common share equivalents outstanding
   - basic and diluted                         7,341        7,168        7,315        7,057
                                            =========   ==========   ==========   ==========

Net loss per common share:
  - basic                                    $ (0.56)     $ (1.42)     $ (2.24)     $ (2.46)
                                            =========   ==========   ==========   ==========
  - diluted                                  $ (0.56)     $ (1.42)     $ (2.24)     $ (2.46)
                                            =========   ==========   ==========   ==========
</TABLE>
U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

March 9, 2015 

Re: Request for Exemption under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization 

and Reform 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

David Topping, doing business as the Topping Group, seeks an exemption 

from certain Federal Aviation Regulations {FARs) pursuant to Section 333 

of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act and Part 11 of Title 14 of the 

C.F.R. 

For more than 25 years The Topping Group has specialized in video 

production for corporate and industrial clients. The Topping Group will 

provide low altitude commercial aerial photography and video services 

utilizing a Small Unmanned Aircraft System. 

This exemption request should be granted because the use of the aircraft 

utilized by The Topping Group under the conditions and limitations 

proposed below will meet or exceed the level of safety Congress has 

intended. The DJI Phantom 1 weighs 3.3 pounds when outfitted with 

camera, gimbal and transmitter. For commercial work, the wide angle lens 

of the Go Pro camera works best at low altitudes - typically less than 200 

feet. This lightweight aircraft is far safer than the alternative for aerial 

photography: manned aircraft, or heavier single rotor radio controlled gas 

powered helicopters. 

Safety is a paramount goal. All flights will be in daylight, below 400 feet, 

and more than five miles from an airport. All flights will be conducted by a 

two-man crew: a pilot who will maintain visual line-of-sight with the 

helicopter, and a director who will monitor the video recordings or still 

photography via transmitter. No flights shall begin unless the aircraft has 

first acquired adequate satellite signals for GPS aided flight and failsafe 

return. 

The name of applicant is: 

David Topping d.b.a. The Topping Group 

77 Madeira Court 

St. Charles, MO 63304 

www.thetopplnggrouo.corr: {314) 852-7473 

\, .. .''1
#### ASSOCIATES FINANCIAL SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC. *v.*SAMUEL P. SORENSEN ET AL.

(SC 15815)

Callahan, C. J., and Norcott, Katz, Palmer and Peters, Js.

Argued April 22

officially released June 23, 1998

*169
      *Abraham I. Gordon,*with whom were *Ronald D. Japha*and, on the brief, *Richard S. Scalo,*for the appellant (substitute plaintiff).

*Beecher A. Larson,*with whom was *Robert A. Solari,*for the appellee (defendant Northern State Financial, LLC).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.1

The appeal is dismissed.

We granted the substitute plaintiffs petition for certification limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s summary judgment?” *Associates Financial Services of America, Inc.*v. *Sorensen,*243 Conn. 944, 704 A.2d 798 (1997).