alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BRIGHT v. STATE.

No. 22253.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 4, 1942.

Conrad E. Smith, of Houston, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is procuring. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of 45 days and a fine of $50.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to justify and sustain his conviction. We think there is merit in his contention.

The evidence adduced by the State, briefly stated, shows that on the night of January 10, 1942, at about 9:30 o’clock, members of the city police went to the Laren-don Hotel in the city of Houston and arrested a number of persons, including appellant, and took them to the police station where they obtained from appellant a written confession in which he stated that he was employed by McDavis as a porter at the Larendon Hotel; that while so employed he did at times procure women for men who came there to spend the night; that the women would give him a tip for his services. The State then proved by Scearce and Collins, policemen of said city, that the Larendon Hotel had the reputation of being a house of prostitution. *No*other evidence was offered. Appellant did not testify or introduce any evidence.

 It will be noted from the foregoing brief statement of the salient facts proved that outside or independent of the appellant’s confession there is no evidence showing that the offense charged was committed. It is now the well-settled rule in this state that one accused of crime cannot be convicted on his extrajudicial confession standing alone. There must be other evidence, either direct or circumstantial, showing that an offense was committed. *458See Patterson v. State, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 661, 146 S.W.2d 993, and authorities there cited. In the instant case, the State introduced no evidence, either direct or circumstantial, which corroborated appellant’s extrajudicial confession. The mere fact that the hotel mentioned had the reputation of being a house of prostitution is not, in our opinion, sufficient corroboration of the confession to show the commission of the offense by appellant.

Believing that the evidence, as disclosed by the record, is insufficient to sustain the conviction, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3386 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3386

 To require Certificates of Citizenship and other Federal documents to 
reflect name and date of birth determinations made by a State court and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2013

Mr. Smith of Texas (for himself and Ms. Bass) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require Certificates of Citizenship and other Federal documents to 
reflect name and date of birth determinations made by a State court and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accuracy for Adoptees Act''.

SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF STATE COURT DETERMINATIONS OF NAME AND BIRTH 
              DATE.

    Section 320 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1431) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) A Certificate of Citizenship or other Federal document issued 
or requested to be amended under this section shall reflect the child's 
name and date of birth as indicated on a State court order, birth 
certificate, certificate of foreign birth, certificate of birth abroad, 
or similar State vital records document issued by the child's State of 
residence in the United States after the child has been adopted or 
readopted in that State.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 8.1**

 

List of Significant  Subsidiaries 

 

The following table liststhe Registrant’s significant subsidiaries, as defined in Rule 1-02(w) ofRegulation S-X, as at December 31, 2004. The table includes the legal name ofthe subsidiary and its jurisdiction of incorporation:

 

Name

 

Call Tel Corporation(Panama)

GFN Comunicaciones, S.A. (Dominican Republic)

TCN Dominicana, S.A.(Dominican Republic)

Tricom Centroamérica, S.A.(Panama)

Tricom USA, Inc.(Delaware)

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28518]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

Notice of Meeting of the Committee of Chairs of the Industry 
Sector and Functional Advisory Committees

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Administrative

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee of Chairs of the Industry Sector and Functional 
Advisory Committees will hold a meeting on November 28, 2000, from 2:00 
p.m. to 4:00 p.m. The meeting will be closed to the public from 2:00 
p.m. to 3:15 p.m., and opened to the public from 3:15 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. 
to discuss the review of the Trade Advisory Committee System.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for November 28, 2000, unless otherwise 
notified.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Office of the U.S. Trade 
Representative, Conference Room 1, located at 1724 F Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C., unless otherwise notified.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sylvia Prosak, (202) 482-3268, 
Department of Commerce, 14th St. and Constitution Ave., N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20230, or Dominic Bianchi, Office of the United States 
Trade Representative, 1724 F. St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20508, (202) 
395-6120.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During the opened portion of the meeting the 
Committee of Chairs will present their report on recommendations for 
reform of the Trade Advisory System.

Dominic Bianchi,
Acting Assistant United States Trade Representative for 
Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-28518 Filed 11-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
```
MAY TERM, 1738.

#### Samuel Young *against*James Williamson.

THIS was an action of replevin for a negro man. The writ issued on the 15th of February, 1732. The defendant pleaded *non cepit infra tres annos.*At the trial of the cause at the Assises, the Jury by their special verdict found, that *Elizabeth*Bourne, by her deed-poll dated the 28th March, 1707, gave to the plaintiff the negro in question. The plaintiff, in the beginning of February, 1732, before the issuing of the replevin, demanded the negro from the defendant; that the father of the plaintiff sold the *146negro to *Daniel*Sullyvan, who sold him to *John Crichard,*^rom whom the defendant purchased him for the consideration of forty pounds, on the 3d of November, 1727, ail(^ ^ad possession from that time until he was *taken by*virtue of the writ of replevin; that *John*Crichard,, at the time he sold the said negro to the defendant, declared to the defendant that he would not warrant and defend him, because the right to the negro was in the plaintiff ; that the defendant, before the death of the plaintiff’s-father, told the plaintiff he had bought the negro in dispute, and heard the plaintiff had a right to him, and if he had requested him to take a legal course to recover the negro, that the defendant might recover back from the plaintiff’s father, the money he gave for the *negro;*that ■the plaintiff then declared he had nothing to do with the said negro ; that he and his father had settled that matter between themselves.

The Provincial Court gave judgment for the defendant,

Lib. E. J. No. 4. fol. 318.
Exhibit 10.8

November 4, 2005

Howard Foyt, M.D., Ph.D.

1205
Sierra Linda Drive

Escondido, CA 92025

Dear Howard:

The purpose of this letter is to provide you with an addendum to the terms set forth in your offer letter dated September 15, 2005. In addition to
the offer of employment with the same benefits and policy guidelines set forth in your original offer letter, the following terms will be added. Subject to the approval of the Board of Directors, you will be granted options to purchase an additional
8,196 shares of Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc. common stock which will have an exercise price of the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of the grant. The option will be granted pursuant to the terms of a separate stock
option agreement and the terms of the Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc. employee stock plan. This will bring your total stock options to 62,806.

In addition to
your base salary, as an Officer of the Company, you will be eligible to earn an annual discretionary performance bonus (the Bonus). Your target Bonus will be up to 25% of your annual base salary, guaranteed for the first year of
employment. Thereafter, your target Bonus will be up to 25% of your annual base salary, assuming 100% attainment of individual and company goals. You must be employed on the date the Bonus is awarded to earn any portion of the Bonus. The
determinations of the Companys Board of Directors with respect to your Bonus will be final and binding. The Bonus program is subject to change or suspension at the discretion of the Companys Board of Directors.

You will be expected to execute and deliver a Severance Agreement with Metabasis consistent with the employment agreements that have been executed with the other
officers. The agreement will include accelerated vesting, severance pay and benefits upon termination without cause or a significant change in role/responsibilities following a merger or acquisition that results in a change in control. In addition,
if you are terminated without cause in the absence of a change in control, you will receive a severance package that will include severance pay and accelerated vesting equal to one year of your then current option grant, if any. This agreement is
attached to this letter and is incorporated by reference herein.

To formally record your acknowledgement of this addendum, please sign below and return
one original of this letter to me as soon as possible.

Sincerely,



|                                                   |  |  |  |                 
|-------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------
|                                                   |  | 
|/s/ MARK ERION                                     |  |  |  |                 
|Mark Erion, Ph.D.                                  |  |  |  |                 
|Executive Vice President, Research and Development |  |  |  |                 
|                                                   |  | 
|/s/ HOWARD FOYT                                    |  |  |  | November 7, 2005
|Howard Foyt, M.D., Ph.D.                           |  |  |  |
EXHIBIT 32.1



PC MALL, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PC Mall, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Frank F.
Khulusi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                       
|-----------------------
|November 8, 2005       
|                       
|/s/ Frank F. Khulusi   
|Frank F. Khulusi       
|Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20574 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FELIX HERNANDEZ-PEDRAZA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-389-3

-------------------- July 12, 2000 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Felix Hernandez-Pedraza appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of conspiracy to transport illegal aliens. He argues that the Government presented insufficient evidence to support the conclusion that he knew the aliens were in the United States illegally. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. See United States v. Shabazz , 993 F.2d 431, 441 (5th Cir. 1993). AFFIRMED.
Order entered February 4, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01258-CV

CATHERINE ROSSI, Appellant

V.

CAE INC. AND CAE SIMUFLITE, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-02898

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s February 1, 2019 second motion for an extension of time 

to file a brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to February 15, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
## MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 1 2/1 /14 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR – 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Discussion of the Clean Power Plan with Tennessee Chamber of Commerce
**SUMMARY :**  

### Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to the Tennessee Chamber of Commerce 

### in Nashville , TN , on October 2 , 2014. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014 . **ATTENDEES: EPA**  Beverly Banister /EPA R4 **External Stakeholders** Approximately 120 audience participants
**ATTACHMENT**
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65872-65873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28112]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial

[[Page 65873]]

property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: October 26, 2000.
    Time: 5:30 pm to 6:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Washington Plaza Hotel, 10 Thomas Circle, NW., 
Washington, DC 20005.
    Contact Person: Richard Panniers, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5148, 7842, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 435-1741.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: October 31, 2000.
    Time: 12:00 pm to 1:30 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Teresa Nesbitt, DVM, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5110, MSC 7854, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 435-1172.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)
    Dated: October 24, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-28112 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
## Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Milton Edward Griggs

No. 06

- 15

- 00096

- CR Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief

Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the petition for writ of mandamus

should be dismissed for want of jurisdictio n . Therefore, we dismiss the petition.

RENDERED JUNE 10, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 215 (Monday, November 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28389]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability of U.S. Patents for Non-Exclusive, Exclusive, or 
Partially-Exclusive Licensing

AGENCY: U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, Maryland.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6, announcement is made of the 
availability of the following U.S. patent for non-exclusive, partially 
exclusive or exclusive licensing. The listed patent has been assigned 
to the United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the 
Army, Washington, DC.
    These patents cover a wide variety of technical arts including: An 
anti-armor projectile with an autonomous, attachable, precursor warhead 
and a ceramic ferroelectric composite material with enhanced electronic 
properties.
    Under the authority of Section 11(a)(2) of the Federal Technology 
Transfer Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-502) and Section 207 of Title 35, 
United States Code, the Department of the Army as represented by the 
U.S. Army Research Laboratory wish to license the U.S. patent listed 
below in a non-exclusive, exclusive or partially exclusive manner to 
any party interested in manufacturing, using, and/or selling devices or 
processes covered by this patent.
    Title: Ceramic Ferroelectric Composite Materials with Enhanced 
Electronic Properties BSTO-MG Based Compound-Rare Earth Oxide.
    Inventors: Luna H. Chiu, Louise C. Sengupta, Steven Stowell, 
Somnath Sengupta and Jennifer Synowcdzynski.
    Patent Number: 6,074,971.
    Issued Date: June 13, 2000.

    Title: Anti-Armour Projectile with Autonomous, Attachable, 
Precursor Warhead.
    Inventor: Ameer G. Mikhail.
    Patent Number: 6,109,185.
    Issued Date: August 29, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Rausa, Technology Transfer 
Office, AMSRL-CS-TT, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving 
Ground, MD 21005-5055, tel: (410) 278-5028; fax: (410) 278-5820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-28389 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998             APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997             OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,376,080                  19,721
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,651,767               3,722,120
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                 175,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,307,956               4,104,181
<PP&E>                                      47,769,027              42,119,800
<DEPRECIATION>                             (17,251,691)            (12,571,037)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,601,078              35,817,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,301,862              32,145,148
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                   9,464
<COMMON>                                    20,077,486                 208,140
<OTHER-SE>                                 (15,280,940)              2,839,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,601,078              35,817,459
<SALES>                                      3,248,700               2,377,701
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,448,943               2,717,817
<CGS>                                        1,691,519               1,465,548
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,520,133               6,007,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (94,326)               (100,967)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             468,280                 599,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (445,144)             (3,789,261)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (445,144)             (3,789,261)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                 166,250
<NET-INCOME>                                  (445,144)             (3,955,511)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)                   (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)                   (.20)
        

</TABLE>