alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### THOMPSON v. STATE.

No. 22808.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 12, 1944.

Chas. Roach and Grady Sturgeon, both of Paris, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of possession of whiskey in a dry area for the purpose of sale. His punishment was assessed at a fine of $100 and imprisonment in the county jail for thirty days.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

*547PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF DATASTREAM SYSTEMS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Datastream Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Larry G. Blackwell, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ LARRY G. BLACKWELLLarry G. BlackwellChief Executive OfficerDatastream Systems, Inc.August 9, 2004
HPLC/UV analysis with detection at 265 nm (LOQ = 2.00 mg a.i./L). Additionally, six control replicates were exposed to test medium only (AAP medium). The algae were illuminated with a light intensity of 5530-5870 lux with constant shaking. A primary stock solution was prepared by dissolving 0.1264 g of test substance in 1000 mL of freshwater AAP medium to achieve a nominal concentration of 100 mg a.i./L The primary stock was mixed by inversion and stirred with a Teflon-coated stirbar and magnetic stirplate while all subsequent dilutions were made. The primary stock solution was proportionally diluted to prepare the desired nominal test concentrations. All test solutions appeared clear and colorless at the time of preparation, and there was no evidence of surface slicks or precipitation at exposure termination. Over the course of testing, temperature ranged from 23.28-23.84°C and pH ranged from 7.3-8.3. The mean cell density of control cultures increased by a factor of 199 within 72 hours. Based on mean measured test concentrations, the 72-hour EC50 values for yield and growth rate were 36 and 78 mg a.i./L, respectively. Based on yield, the 72-hour NOEC and LOEC values were 13 and 25 mg a.i./L, respectively; the ChV for yield was calculated to be 18 mg a.i./L. Based on growth rate, the 72-hour NOEC and LOEC values were 25 and 48 mg a.i./L, respectively; the ChV for growth rate was calculated to be 34.6 mg a.i./L.

Yield: 72-hour EC50 = 36 mg a.i./L 72-hour NOEC = 13 mg a.i./L 72-hour LOEC = 25 mg a.i./L 72-hour ChV = 18 mg a.i./L

Growth rate: 72-hour EC50 = 78 mg a.i./L 72-hour NOEC = 25 mg a.i./L 72-hour LOEC = 48 mg a.i./L 72-hour ChV = 34.6 mg a.i./L

The 96-hour fish toxicity test (LC50 > 129 mg a.i./L), the 48-hour daphnid toxicity test (EC50 = 9.7 mg a.i./L), and 72-hour algae toxicity test (EC50 = 36 mg/L; N OEC = 13 mg/L; LOEC = 25 mg/L) were adequate for P-15-0428. For comparative purposes, the 96-hour fish LC50 of > 100 mg/L, the 48-hour daphnid EC50 of 1.73 mg/L, and the 96-hour algae EC50 of 7.05 mg/L were calculated based on analog data presented in Based on the acute daphnia experimental data of 9.7 mg/L (9700 ppb), and the application of an assessment factor of 5, the acute concentration of concern (CoC) for P-15-0428 is 1940 ppb. The daphnia experimental results indicate that it is the most sensitive species, thus the chronic value (ChV) for P-15-0428 is calculated by dividing the daphnia EC50 of 9.7 mg/L by an acute to chronic ratio of 70 (based on ) to yield a ChV of 0.139 mg/L (139 ppb). The chronic CoC for P-15-0428 is then derived by dividing the ChV of 0.139 mg/L (139 ppb) by a factor of 10 (assessment factor) yielding a chronic CoC of 13.9 ppb.

Acute CoC = 1940 p pb

Chronic CoC = 13.9 p pb
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3626 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3626

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To extend the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 for 10 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF UNDETECTABLE FIREARMS ACT OF 1988 FOR 10 YEARS.

    Section 2(f)(2) of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 (18 U.S.C. 
922 note) is amended by striking ``25'' and inserting ``35''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3626

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To extend the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 for 10 years.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**PC MALL, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of PC Mall, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Brandon H. LaVerne, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely forpurposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2)          the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periodsindicated.

 

This Certification has notbeen, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.

 
| August 9, 2010     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| /s/ Brandon H. LaVerne  |   |
| Brandon H. LaVerne      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

                  CONSENT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-32598, 333-39054, 333-40182, 333-48170,
333-51518, 333-54808) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-97461) of Dynabazaar, Inc. of
our report dated February 7, 2003 relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 31, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Essex
Portfolio, L.P. report for the year ended December 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          18,080
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,259
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,217
<PP&E>                                         943,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,789
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 931,796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,047
<BONDS>                                        361,515
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                2
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     389,797
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   931,796
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,268
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,881
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   930
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,092
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,138
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             40,138
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  4,718
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,420
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41
        

</TABLE>
# Contents

Data 1

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngwhhdw.htm

infoctr@eia.doe.gov

# Data 1

Back to Contents
Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Bernard J. Berk, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
            Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of
            operations of the Company for the periods presented.


Date:  June 27, 2008         /s/ Bernard J. Berk
                             ----------------------------------
                             Bernard J. Berk
                             Chief Executive Officer of
                             Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Elite
Pharmaceuticals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.14
 SUPPORT AGREEMENT
RSA SECURITY INC.
  Enterprise Name (You): iPass Inc.
    
    Jurisdiction of Incorporation:CaliforniaStreet Address: 3800 Bridge Parkway
    
    State & Zip Code: California 94065City: Redwood ShoresEnterprise Legal Contact (Name & Title):
 Maintenance and Support Program Elected þ o
 Initial Support Fee
  1. DEFINITIONS
  1.1 License Agreement
 1.2 RSA Software
 2. MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT SERVICES
 2.1 General




---



##### 



2.2 Support and Maintenance.
 2.3 Support Provided by RSA.
 2.3.1 Support Under Standard Program.
 2.3.2 Support Under Premier Program.
 2.4 Error Correction.




---



##### 



2.5 Updates.
 3. MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT FEES
 3.1 Support Fees.
 3.2 Additional Charges.
 3.3 Taxes.
 3.4 Terms of Payment.
 3.5 U.S. Currency.
 4. CONFIDENTIALITY




---



##### 



5. USE LIMITATIONS; TITLE; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNITY; LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
  6. TERM AND TERMINATION
 6.1 Term.
 6.2 Termination.
 6.2.1
 6.2.2
 6.2.3
 6.2.4
 6.3 Survival of Certain Terms.




---



##### 



7. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 iPass, Inc.
    
    RSA Security Inc.By:
    
    /s/ Donald C. McCauley
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Narendra GoelPrinted Name:
    
    Donald C. McCauley
    
    Printed Name:
    
    Narendra GoelTitle:
    
    VP & CFO
    
    Title:
    
    Director, Finance & OPSDate:
    
    2/28/2000
    
    
    
    Date:
    
    2/29/2000
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CARRIE BAUER, §

STEPHANEY MAYFIELD, §

and ELIZABETH SUE §

§

Plaintiffs, §

§ Civil Action No. 3:21-cv-2250-BH

v. §

§

RUFE SNOW INVESTMENT, LLC., § JURY DEMANDED

d/b/a IN-N-OUT GYROS and STOP-N-GO §

GYROS, and §

ZIAD MASSARWA, Individually §

§

Defendants §

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. After considering 

such Motion, Defendants’ Response thereto, and the Pleadings filed in this matter, it is the 

opinion of the Court that such Motion should be in all things GRANTED.

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is in all 

things GRANTED and that, as a matter of law:

1. Plaintiff Elizabeth Sue is not exempt from the overtime requirements of the Fair 

Labor Standards Act as an executive employee; and

2. Plaintiffs were entitled to retain all tips paid to them by customers.

SO ORDERED, on this ____ day of ____________________, 2022.

_________________________________

IRMA CARRILLO RAMIREZ

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:21-cv-02250-BH Document 22-1 Filed 11/18/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1098
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ORBIT
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              18
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    18
<PP&E>                                             335
<DEPRECIATION>                                     305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,705
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           331
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,918)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       118
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  80
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (345)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (345)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (345)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    $(0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(0.01)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Carter J. Ward certify that:



| | 1) | I have reviewed this amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March
31, 2015 of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Registrant”);
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: July 11, 2016 | /s/ Carter J. Ward | 
|------------------- | ------------------ | 



| | Carter J. Ward, Chief Financial Officer | 
| | --------------------------------------- |
)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CHARISE CAUDLE

Plaintiff,

SOCIN L SECURITY ADMINiSTRATION.

Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-0527 -C-BH

ORDER

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation ofthe United

States Magistrate .Iudge advising that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss should be granted. The

parties have failed to file any objections and the time to do so has now expired.

The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error

and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation

are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated

therein, Plaintifls claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. To the extent that jurisdiction exists over Plaintiff s claims for violations ofher

civil rights under Bivers, her Bivens claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to

state a claim

SO ORDERED this ,r4 o*orSeptember,2022

INGS

D STATE

SA

R

C

,

CT JUDGE

Case 3:22-cv-00527-C-BH Document 11 Filed 09/12/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 63
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Future Services Company For Trading ) 

and General Transport W.L.L. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W91 GXE-08-A-0003 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60477 

Mr. Sarni Zeidan 

General Manager/Corporate Officer 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Christopher C. Cross, JA 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The government has moved to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, 

alleging that appellant had not submitted a claim to the contracting officer. In 

response, appellant expressed a desire to submit its claim to the contracting officer for 

a decision. As directed by the Board, the government provided appellant with the 

contact information for the contracting officer and appellant has indicated that it 

submitted its claim to the contracting officer. 

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice to a timely appeal from 

a contracting officer's denial or deemed denial of the contractor's claim. 

Dated: 14 June 2016 

/ MARk N:STEMPlER 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60477, Appeal of Future 

Services Company For Trading and General Transport W.L.L., rendered in 

conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT
        32.2
  CERTIFICATIONS
        PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
   In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Hyperdynamics Corporation
        (Hyperdynamics), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Steven M. Plumb,
        Chief Financial Officer of Hyperdynamics, does hereby certify, pursuant to
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to his
        knowledge:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
        February 11, 2008
 
 By:
              /s/
                  Steven M. PlumbSteven
                  M. PlumbChief
                  Financial OfficerPrincipal
                  Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7863

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

NNAMDI AZUBIKE EMODI, a/k/a Tony,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (CR-91-36-D)

Submitted: March 26, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nnamdi Azubike Emodi, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

"Motion for Modification of an Imposed Term of Imprisonment." Our

review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses

that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Emodi, No. CR-91-

36-D (M.D.N.C. Oct. 25, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED