alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6138

PETER OBRIEN SHELTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-03-0314-02) Submitted: March 29, 2004 Decided: April 9, 2004 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter Obrien Shelton, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Christopher Galanides, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Peter Obrien Shelton seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Shelton that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Shelton failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Shelton has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Public Meeting Agenda 

Physical Characterization of Smart and Grid-Connected 

Commercial and Residential Buildings End-Use Equipment and Appliances 

April 30, 2014 

Research Support Facility, South Table Mountain Campus of the Department of 

Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (San Juan Conference Room) 

Purpose and Objectives 

To solicit comment and data from the public on issues related to the physical characterization of smart 

and grid- connected commercial and residential buildings end-use equipment and appliances. 

 Discuss issues concerning (but not limited to) 

o Processes and metrics for measurement 

o Identification of grid and building services that can be provided 

o Identification of values and benefits of grid connectivity 

 Gather input on topics related to grid-connected equipment through engagement with 

stakeholder groups and identification of relevant published work and studies 

Time Topic Presenter / Facilitator

8:30 Welcome, Introduction, Ground rules Facilitator

8:45 DOE Vision and Objectives

 Public Comment

Joe Hagerman, DOE/BTO

9:15 Terminology and Definitions 

 Public Comment

Scott Whalen, PNNL

9:45 End-User and Grid Services

 Public Comment

Facilitator

10:15 Break

10:30 Physical Characterization Framework

 Public Comment

Rob Pratt, PNNL

Ben Kroposki, NREL

11:30 Value, Benefits & Metrics

 Public Comment

Sriram Somasundaram, PNNL

12:00 Lunch

1:00 Additional Public Comment Period

 Open comment on pre-lunch topics

 Key stakeholders that DOE should engage

 Reports/analyses/case studies that DOE

should review and consider

 Other topics that DOE should consider 

related to smart and grid-connected 

appliances and equipment

Facilitator

3:00 Wrap up and next steps Joe Hagerman, DOE/BTO

3:30 Adjourn

3:30 Optional Tour of the Energy Systems Integration 

Facility

NREL
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [CO-500 0777-XQ-2527]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 5 U.S.C. Appendix, notice is hereby given that the next meeting of the Front Range Resource Advisory Council (Colorado) will be held on November 9 in Canon City, Colorado. 

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 9:15 a.m. at the Holy Cross Abbey Community Center, 2951 E. Highway 50, Canon City, Colorado. Topics will include an update on the Revision of the Arkansas Headwaters Recreation Area Plan and election of officers. All Resource Advisory Council meetings are open to the public. Interested persons may make oral statements to the Council at 9:30 a.m. or written statements may be submitted for the Council's consideration. The Center Manager may limit the length of oral presentations depending on the number of people wishing to speak. 

# DATES:

The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, November 9, 2000 from 9:15 a.m. to 4 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

                        Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Front Range                               ( print page 64984)                            Center, 3170 East Main Street, Canon City, Colorado 81212.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ken Smith at (719) 269-8500. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Summary minutes for the Council meeting will be maintained in the Canon City Center and will be available for public inspection and reproduction during regular business hours within thirty (30) days following the meeting. 

Dated: October 19, 2000.

John Carochi,

Acting Front Range Center Manager.

[FR Doc. 00-27843 Filed 10-30-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PDI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bernard C. Boyle,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.


/s/ Bernard C. Boyle
--------------------------
Bernard C. Boyle
Chief Financial Officer
March 3, 2004
Case 4:22-cr-00066-O Document 12 Filed 01/26/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 13
#### Isaac GARLAND, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27143.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 3, 1954.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is aggravated assault on an officer; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $100.

Accompanying the record is an affidavit in proper form executed by the appellant requesting the dismissal of the appeal.

The request is granted, and the appeal is. dismissed.
BRITTANY HANEY

, Appellant,

v.

LESLIE SLOAN

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1326

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 3, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. James B. Fensom , Judge

. Caryn L. Bellus and Bretton C. Albrecht of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Dennis R. Schutt and Cindy K. Kinslow

- Coats of Schutt, Schmidt & Noey, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from the final judgment awarding attorneys’ fees and costs

to the appellee, Leslie Sloan, in litigation that was separately appealed to this

Court. See Haney v. Sloan , 1D15

- 3905.2 Because the appellant, Brittany Haney, has prevailed in t he main appeal, the

trial court’s award of attorneys’ fees and costs in Ms. Sloan’s favor must also be

reversed. See Panama City Bay County Airport & Indus. Dist. v. Kellogg Brown &

Root Services, Inc. , 136 So. 3d 788 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014 ); see also § 768.79(1), Fla.

Stat. ( an attorneys’ fees award under the offer of judgment statute is predicated on a

valid final judgment).

This decision is without prejudice to either party seeking an award of

attorneys’ fees after a new valid final judgment has be en entered.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

B.L. THOMAS, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

September 29, 2014

Mr. David K. Paylor, Director

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

629 East Main Street,

Richmond, Virginia 23219

Dear Mr. Paylor:

On July 23, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision 

to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of Environmental 

Quality (VADEQ). This SIP revision consists of the 2011 Base Year Emissions Inventory for the 

Northern Virginia portion of the Washington, DC-MD-VA 2008 Ozone Nonattainment Area. 

EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is 

reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR). 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Marilyn Powers, 

Office of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-2308. She is the principal contact for this 

rulemaking. 

 Sincerely, 

/s/

Diana Esher, Director

 Air Protection Division
Financial Assurance Demonstration for ADM CCS#1 Page H1of 4

Permit Number: IL- 115

- 6A -0002



### ATTACHMENT H: FINANCIAL ASSURANCE DEMONSTRATION

Facility name: Archer Daniels Midland, CCS#1 Well

IL

- 115-6A-0002

Facility contact: Mr. Mark Burau, Plant Manager

4666 F aries Parkway, Decatur, IL (217) 424-5750, mark.burau@adm.com

Well location: Decatur, Macon County, IL;

39° 52’ 37.06469” N, 88° 53’ 36.25685” W

AD M is providing financial responsibility pursuant to 40 CFR 146.85. ADM is using a

c orporate guarantee to cover the costs of: corrective action, emergency and remedial response, inj ection well plugging, and post-injection site care and site closure.

The estimated costs of each of these activities, as provided in “Cost Estimate to Demonstrate Financial Responsibility for Class VI UIC Permit” (September 5, 2014) are presented in Table 1:

T able 1. Cost Estimates for Activities to be Covered by Financial Responsibility

Activity Total Cost ($)

Performing Corr ective Action on Wells in AoR 231,800

Plugging Injection Wells 594,120

Post

- Injection Site Care 6,434,500

Site Closure 535,300

Emergency and Remedial Response 30,792,000
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule Contians Summary Financial Information Extracted From The
Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets and condensed consolidated
statements of operations filed with Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         000939730
<NAME>                        EXPERT SOFTWARE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         1,605
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,260
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,002)
<INVENTORY>                                    2,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,266
<PP&E>                                         4,171
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,479)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,142
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       76
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,963
<SALES>                                        7,394
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,394
<CGS>                                          3,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               11,250
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             13
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (311)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (311)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (311)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.04)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

          31.2 THE RULE 15d-14(a)

I, Kimberly A. Springsteen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Commonwealth Income &
Growth Fund II (the Registrant);

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;
     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and
5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

/s/  Kimberly A. Springsteen
----------------------------
Kimberly A. Springsteen
Principal Financial Officer
May 16, 2005
Exhibit 15.2




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






We have issued our reports dated June 22, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Jinpan International Limited on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Jinpan International Limited on Form F-3 (No. 333-140094, effective January 19, 2007), Form S-8 (No. 333-140109, effective January 19, 2007), and Form F-3 (No. 333-151817, effective September 8, 2008).






/s/ Grant Thornton




Shanghai, The People’s Republic of China


June 22, 2011
#### STANDLEY v. STATE.

No. 25737.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 5, 1952.

*642No attorney, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This appeal is from a conviction for felony theft, with punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

No sentence accompanies the record. A sentence is necessary in ordinary felony cases to the jurisdiction of this court. Garbs v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 234 S.W.2d 869.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3626 

AN ACT 

To extend the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 for 10 

years. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3626 EH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF UNDETECTABLE FIREARMS ACT 

2 OF 1988 FOR 10 YEARS. 

3 Section 2(f)(2) of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 

4 1988 (18 U.S.C. 922 note) is amended by striking ‘‘25’’ 

5 and inserting ‘‘35’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 

2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3626 

AN ACT 

To extend the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 

for 10 years.
H. Con. Res. 105 Agreed to May 27, 1993

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of

Thursday, May 27, 1993, it stand adjourned until noon on Tuesday,

June 8, 1993, or until noon on the second day after Members

are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent

resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate

recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Friday, May 28,

1993, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader, or his

designee, in accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or

adjourned until noon, or until such time as may be specified by

the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to adjourn or

recess, on Monday, June 7, 1993, or until noon on the second

day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section

2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader

of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall

notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively,

to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

            In connection with the quarterly report of PC Mall, Inc., a Delawarecorporation, and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"Report"), I, Ted Sanders, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

                   (1)  the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

                   (2)  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.  

              This Certification has notbeen, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.
#### McCLENDON v. STATE.

No. 24334.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 25, 1949.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.'

Murder is the offense; the punishment, death.

The undisputed evidence shows that appellant and two others entered into a conspiracy to rob the deceased. When the robbery was attempted, deceased resisted — whereupon appellant killed him by shooting him four times with a pistol. After the fatal wounds and before death, the robbery was completed by taking from the déceased his purse containing $107, which the co-conspirators divided among themselves.

Appellant’s written confession was introduced in evidence. It was shown to have been freely and voluntarily made,, in accordance with Art. 727, C.C.P.,' as to which no issue arose under the facts.

Appellant’s exceptions to the charge in which he sought to have the jury instructed to disregard the confession was properly overruled. No exception was reserved to .the receipt in evidence of the confession.

The • case appears to have been fairly tried. The facts warranted the jury in inflicting the death penalty. Appellant was represented by counsel.

The judgment is affirmed.

Approved by the'Court.