alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65881-65882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28181]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--the Asymmetrical Digital Subscriber Line Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 13, 1999, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Asymmetrical Digital 
Subscriber Line Forum (``ADSL'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Accelerated 
Networks, Inc., Westlake Village, CA; Arescom, Fremont, CA; AudioCodes, 
Yehud, Israel; Avail Networks, Ann Arbor, MI; Conklin Corporation, 
Norcross, GA; CS Telecom, Fontenay-aux-Rosex cedex, France; Elicon 
Technology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Fantastic Corporation, Baar, 
Switzerland; Flashcom,

[[Page 65882]]

Westminster, CA; General Bandwidth, Austin, TX; Hellenic 
Telecommunications Organization, Marroussi, Greece; i-Beam 
Broadcasting, Sunnyvale, CA; Integral Access, Inc., Chelmsford, MA; 
Kenetec, Chesire, CT; Lucent Technologies, No. Andover, MA; NightFire 
Software, Berkeley, CA; Santera Systems, Gunter, TX; Sphere 
Communications, Lake Bluff, IL; Surf Communications Solutions, D.N. 
Misgav, Israel; Telia AB, Stockholm, Sweden; Telmax Communications, 
Fremont, CA; Turk Telecom, Ankara, Turkey; and Tycho Networks, Santa 
Cruz, CA have been added as parties to this venture. Also, General 
Datacom, Middlebury, CT has been dropped as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and ADSL intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 15, 1995, ADSL filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 25, 
1995 (60 FR 338058).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 7, 
1999. A notice for this filing has not yet been published in the 
Federal Register.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-28181 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 23


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Leeds Federal Bankshares, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement (No.
333-44899)  on Form S-8 of Leeds  Federal  Bankshares,  Inc. of our report dated
August 16, 2001, relating to the consolidated  statements of financial condition
of Leeds Federal  Bankshares,  Inc. and  subsidiary as of June 30, 2001 and 2000
and the related  consolidated  statements  of income and  comprehensive  income,
stockholders'  equity  and cash  flows for each of the  years in the  three-year
period  ended June 30, 2001,  which  report  appears in the June 30, 2001 Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Leeds Federal Bankshares, Inc



                                    /s/ KPMG LLP


Baltimore, Maryland
September 27, 2001
Exhibit
  13.1



---





CertificationPursuant
  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a)
  and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
  chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers
  of United Utilities PLC, an English public limited company (the Company),
  does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:The Annual Report on Form
  20-F for the year ended March 31, 2005 (the Form 20-F) of the Company
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
  of the Company.

|Dated: | June
      1, 2005 | /s/
      John Roberts
|------ | ------------------ | ----------------------
|       |                    | John Edward Roberts   
|       |                    | Chief Executive       
|       |                    |                       
|       |                    |                       
|       |                    |                       
|Dated: | June 1, 2005       | /s/ Simon Batey       
|       |                    | Simon George Batey    
|       |                    | Group Finance Director
|       |                    |                       



---
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2816]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY:  Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board was scheduled to meet in closed 
session at the Pentagon, Arlington, VA, on January 26-27, 2000. 
However, due to severe weather conditions, the meeting was cancelled 
and has not been rescheduled. Notice of this meeting was published in 
the Federal Register on November 24, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 226, Page 
66173).

    Dated: February 2, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-2816 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
#### MOORE v. STATE.

No. 25858.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 14, 1952.

Rehearing Denied June 25, 1952.

No attorney for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area, prior convictions being alleged for the purpose of enhancing the *598penalty; the punishment, a fipe of $1,500 and 6 months in jail.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

The proceedings appear regular on their face; and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Compensation on Non-Employee Directors



 EXHIBIT 10.14 
 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors 
 Fees for Non-Employee Directors 
 Annual Cash Retainer Fees. Each Non-employee Director receives an annual cash retainer of $8,000, except the Lead Independent Director, who receives an annual cash
retainer of $15,000. In addition, non-employee Directors receive an attendance fee of $4,000 for each Board meeting attended. 
 Committee Meeting Fees.
Non-employee Directors that are committee members receive an attendance fee of $2,000 for each committee meeting attended. The chair of each committee receives an attendance fee of $4,000 for each committee meeting attended. 
 Telephone Conference Meeting Fees. Non-employee Directors receive an attendance fee of $1,000 for each scheduled telephone meeting attended in lieu of any Board
or Committee meeting fees referenced above. 
 All directors are reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred
in attending Board and committee meetings. 
 Stock Options 
 Non-employee Directors are annually granted an option to purchase 8,500 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Company’s Non-Employee Directors Equity Incentive Plan (the “Directors’ Plan”). Except under certain limited
circumstances, no options granted pursuant to the Director’s Plan become exercisable earlier than one year after the date of grant. The option price per share of Common Stock under the Directors’ Plan is equal to 100% of the fair market
value of the Common Stock at the date of grant. Each option granted under the Directors’ Plan is exercisable for ten years after the date of grant. Non-employee Directors may elect to receive additional shares of Common Stock under the
Directors’ Plan in lieu of the cash compensation otherwise due them.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Ben Cannon Wherry, Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00032

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 4th District Court of Rusk County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR17

- 313 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Just ice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment
of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to reflect that appellant was

convicted of a state jail felony. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We further order that the a ppellant, Ben Cannon Wherry, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED OCTOB ER 4, 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132841 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132841 COA: 264595 Oakland CC: 2004-199506-FC JUAN HOSEA JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 16, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 338 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to include certain 

territories and possessions of the United States in the 

definition of State for the purposes of chapter 114, relating to trafficking in contraband cigarettes and smokeless 

tobacco. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

HR 338 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Tobacco Smug3 gling in the Territories Act of 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS OF THE UNITED 

5 STATES INCLUDED IN THE DEFINITION OF 

6 STATE FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE PROHIBI7 TION AGAINST TRAFFICKING IN CONTRA8 BAND CIGARETTES AND SMOKELESS TO9 BACCO. 

10 Paragraph (4) of section 2341 of title 18, United 

11 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘or the Virgin Is12 lands’’ and inserting ‘‘the Virgin Islands, American 

13 Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Is14 lands, or Guam’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF GOLF TECHNOLOGY HOLDING, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         188,704
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  877,188
<ALLOWANCES>                                   330,919
<INVENTORY>                                    714,807
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,980,517
<PP&E>                                         546,644
<DEPRECIATION>                                 192,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,636,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,482,633
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        402
<COMMON>                                         5,464
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,148,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,636,925
<SALES>                                        491,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               543,435
<CGS>                                          359,288
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  835,601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               844,106
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               199,702
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,495,560)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,495,560)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,495,560)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.29)
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

132009 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. IMAD SAAD, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff, Justices Counter-Defendant-Appellant,

v SC: 132009 COA: 268638 Macomb CC: 04-001252-CK DART PROPERTIES, INC., a/k/a LAUREL VALLEY APARTMENTS, Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 28, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit 99.1(b)



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  HomeSeekers.com,   Inc,  (the
 "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
 Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Steven
 M. Crane,  President,  Chief  Operating  Officer,  and Acting  Chief  Financial
 Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted
 pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 (1)     The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2)     The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




 /S/ Steven M. Crane
 -----------------------------
 Steven M. Crane
 President and Chief Operating Officer
 Acting Chief Financial Officer
 June 2, 2003



<PAGE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.20(b)




                                    THE LEASE

Lessor:             Office Kitawaki Y.K.

Lessee:             Genomic Solutions K.K.

Lease Office:       Takanawa Katsurazaka Bldg. 1F
                    12-24, Takanawa 2-Chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0074
                    (268.93 m2)

Lease Term:         For 2 years between March 15th 2000 and March 14th 2002

Deposit:            (Y)8,083,800.-
Rental Fee:         (Y)808,380/month (without consumption tax)
Common Service Fee:
                    (Y)314,370/month (without consumption tax)
Consumption Tax:
                    Rental Fee, Common service fee and Public utility charges
                    such as Electricity and Water charge are taxable (5%).

Date:               March 1, 2000

Lessor:             Office Kitawaki Y.K.
                    12-24, Takanawa 2-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo
                    Representative Director  Hideo KITAWAKI

Lessee:             Genomic Solutions K.K.
                    3-5, Higashi-Gotanda 2-chome, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo
                    Representative Director  Motonori AKAHORI

Joint Surety:       Motonori AKAHORI
                    1-28-207, Arima 1-chome, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki-city, Kanagawa

Real Estate Agent (The Observer):
                    Build-Bank Tokyo K.K.
                    9-9, Kyobashi 2-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo
                    Executive Director  Masaru YOSHINO

                    Arumo House Y.K.
                    10-14, Minami-Rinkan 2-chome, Yamato-city, Kanagawa
                    Representative Director  Katsuyuki KANEHIRA
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                        4409
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               105863
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  81660
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            322264
<PP&E>                                      178676
<DEPRECIATION>                               98731
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              599954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       122907
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     12429
<OTHER-SE>                                  464618
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                599954
<SALES>                                     243389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            243389
<CGS>                                        98253
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               141750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             130450
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           3386
<DISCONTINUED>                              127065
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                130450
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .01


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 353 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 353

  To require the Secretary of the Treasury to implement a program to 
   prevent the fraudulent use of taxpayer identification numbers of 
 residents of United States territories and possessions to be used to 
 obtain a credit or refund on tax returns filed with the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2013

   Mr. Dent introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of the Treasury to implement a program to 
   prevent the fraudulent use of taxpayer identification numbers of 
 residents of United States territories and possessions to be used to 
 obtain a credit or refund on tax returns filed with the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROGRAM TO PREVENT FRAUDULENT USE OF TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION 
              NUMBERS OF RESIDENTS OF TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall, in coordination with the 
territories and possessions of the United States, implement a program 
to prevent the fraudulent use of taxpayer identification numbers of 
residents of such territories and possessions to obtain a refund or 
credit against any tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 
Such program shall include a comparison of all income tax returns filed 
with the United States and any territory or possession of the United 
States, under the same taxpayer identification number.
                                 <all>
```
July 23 , 2015

M r. Garry Goett

KFG Enterprises, LLC

6327 West Fauber Road

Bartonville, IL 61607

Dear Mr. Goett :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your May 12

, 2015 exemption request on behalf of KFG Enterprises, LLC into the

public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 1462 ), but we are unable to process your request any further.

The information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed).

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, h ow it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional i nformation, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any ques tions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

B rittany N ewton

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure