alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,297
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                       812
<INVENTORY>                                     63,715
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,139
<PP&E>                                          18,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,988
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           90,503
<BONDS>                                          1,158
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,700
<SALES>                                         41,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,279
<CGS>                                           36,787
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (296)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 957
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    638
<INCOME-TAX>                                       307
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                331
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       331
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3333 

To authorize the Federal Emergency Management Agency to award mitigation 

financial assistance in certain areas affected by wildfires. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 23, 2013 

Mr. RUIZ (for himself, Mr. TIPTON, Mr. COOK, and Mr. POLIS) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To authorize the Federal Emergency Management Agency 

to award mitigation financial assistance in certain areas 

affected by wildfires. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wildfire Prevention 

5 Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WILDFIRE MITIGATION ASSISTANCE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 420 of the Robert T. 

8 Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 5187) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3333 IH

1 (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub2 section (e); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(d) POST DISASTER MITIGATION ASSISTANCE.— 

6 The President may provide hazard mitigation assistance 

7 in accordance with section 404 in any area in which assist8 ance was provided under this section, whether or not a 

9 major disaster had been declared.’’. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The Robert T. 

11 Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 

12 (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) is amended— 

13 (1) in section 404(a) (42 U.S.C. 5170c(a))— 

14 (A) by inserting before the first period ‘‘, 

15 or any area in which assistance was provided 

16 under section 420’’; and 

17 (B) in the third sentence, by inserting ‘‘or 

18 event under section 420’’ after ‘‘major disaster’’ 

19 each place that term appears; and 

20 (2) in section 322(e)(1) (42 U.S.C. 5165(e)(1)), 

21 by inserting ‘‘or event under section 420’’ after 

22 ‘‘major disaster’’ each place that term appears. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-16-00764- CV In re Trustee s of th e TEL Of fsh ore Tr ust ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Having revie wed the petition for writ of mandamus, the response , the reply , and the rec ord, we deny

the petition. We dismi ss as moot relators’ motion for emer g ency stay . 1

__________________________________________

Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices Puryear , Pemberton, and F ield Filed: Nove mber 16, 2016

See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) . 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                   1,329,006
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              573,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                18,068
<INVENTORY>                                233,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         2,241,499
<PP&E>                                     107,876
<DEPRECIATION>                              60,706
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,384,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      374,514
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,120
<COMMON>                                    13,543
<OTHER-SE>                               1,996,127
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,384,186
<SALES>                                    130,789
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           198,323
<CGS>                                      241,686
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              555,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (388,732)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (388,732)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (388,732)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.030)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.030)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                     32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CEO

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund II,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
George S. Springsteen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/      George S. Springsteen
------------------------------
George S. Springsteen
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2004
#### WOODY v. STATE.

No. 21769.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 3, 1941.

*271E. T. Adams, of Glen Rose, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for misdemeanor swindling in executing a check for $5 without sufficient funds to cover same. Punishment assessed was by fine of $5.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are found in the record. There are some exceptions to the court’s instruction to the jury, but same can not be appraised without knowing what facts were developed on the trial.

The judgment is affirmed.
OCTOBER TERM, 1766.

Lib. D. D. No. 11. fol. 24.

#### Wilson Cage’s Lessee *against*William Courts, by his Guardian.

EJECTMENT for a tract of land called *Wilson,*lying in *Charles*County. The defendant took defence for a tract of land called *Robins and Henly,*and for a tract, called *Crowley.*The cause was tried at the Assises, where the verdict was for the defendant.

At the trial of the cause, the plaintiff offered to read in evidence the copy of a record of a commission, dated the 19th *May,*1753, directed to four commissioners, M'ith a power to three or two to act, obtained by *William Courts*out of *Charles*County Court, to prove and perpetuate *240tbe bounds of three tracts of land, called *Robert and*Henly, *Burrovj*Hall, and Cowley, together with the return of the commissioners with certain depositions; by certificates indorsed, it appeared that three of the commissioners had qualified ; and proceed to state that the depositions were taken; and it is certified by two of the commissioners, “ that public notice was given of the time and place of the “ examination thereof, according to the directions of the “ act of Assembly of this Province, in such cases provided, “ and that the foregoing depositions were taken in the pre- “ sence of all parties concerned then attending.” Signed and sealed by *two*of the commissioners, dated 28th April, 1753. The plaintiff then offered in evidence, to read the deposition of *Francis*Glass, contained in the same record; to which the defendant objected; but the Court was of opinion that the same should be read in evidence.
---

Exhibit 13.2

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 
    CFO Certification In connection with the annual report of Getty Copper Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald Willoughby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Donald Willoughby Name: Donald Willoughby 
    Title: Chief Financial Officer 
    June 23, 2010 A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 20-F to which it relates, is not to be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 20-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.


---
# TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

**JUDGMENT RENDERED June 11, 2019**

**NO.  03-19-00183-CV**

**Austin Specialty Foods, LLC, Appellant**

**v.**

**Community Brewing Co., LLC, Appellee**

**APPEAL FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY**

**BEFORE Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith**

**DISMISSED ON JOINT MOTION -- OPINION BY Chief Justice Rose**

n

This is an appeal from the judgmenttrial court’s order issued on March 15, 2019.  Appellant, Austin Specialty Foods, LLC and Appellee, Community Brewing Co., LLC have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the motion should be granted.  Therefore, the Court grants the joint motion and dismisses the appeal.  Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Order entered December 12, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00075-CR

WINTER KAY ARTHUR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 16-30605-CC2-M

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s November 27, 2018 motion to correct the amended 

reporter’s record and thereafter to extend the time to file the State’s brief. The amended 

reporter’s record filed with the Court on October 29, 2018 contains a two-part video exhibit 

labeled as “Amend State’s Exhibit 4.” The State alleges that only “part 001” of amended Exhibit

4 was admitted into evidence at trial and played for the jury. Accordingly, the State has moved 

to strike “part 002” of State’s amended Exhibit 4. Appellant has not filed an objection to the 

State’s request. From the discussion on the record, it appears only portions of one video feed 

were reviewed and played for the jury.

We ORDER appellant’s counsel to file with the Court, on or before December 21, 2018, 

a certification stating whether appellant agrees with the State’s position that “part 002” of State’s 
–2–

amended Exhibit 4 was not admitted into evidence or played for the jury and should be stricken 

from the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(e)(1). If either appellant does not agree with the 

State’s assertion regarding “part 002” of amended State’s Exhibit 4 or if appellant fails to 

respond to this order, the case will be abated for a hearing in the trial court to resolve the issue 

concerning the accuracy of amended State’s Exhibit 4. 

We GRANT the portion of the State’s motion seeking an extension of time to file the 

State’s brief and ORDER the State’s brief filed on or before THIRTY DAYS from the date of 

this order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
#### Ex parte SMITH.

No. 24949.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 11, 1950.

Allen & Street, Dallas, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Relator was charged with the offense of burglary at nighttime and theft in the State of Idaho.

He was held in Dallas, Texas by virtue of a warrant of arrest issued by the Governor of this state upon the request of the Governor of Idaho, remanding this relator to the custody of an agent of the State of Idaho, to be there returned to answer for such offense.

The burden of showing that relator was not in said. State of Idaho, at the time of the. alleged commission of such offense and therefore not a fugitive therefrom was upon the relator. See Ex parte Hogue, 112 Tex.Cr.R. 495, 17 S.W.2d 1047, and many cases cited.

There is no showing in the record regarding the absence of relator in the demanding state at the time alleged in the •affidavit relative to the offenses. In the absence of such proof, we hold that the warrant of the Governor of Texas shows the relator to be a fugitive from the State of Idaho. -

In the late case of Ex parte Noble, 198 S.W.2d 893, we held that: *“It*appears now to be well established that in an extradition proceeding the executive warrant of the Governor of the asylum State is prima facie evidence of the existence of every fact' which that executive was obliged to deter*993mine before issuing it. See Ex parte Nix, 85 Tex.Cr.R. 307, 212 S.W. 507, 508; Ex parte Carroll, 86 Tex.Cr.R. 301, 217 S.W. 382, 8 A.L.R. 901; Hyatt v. People of State of New York, 188 U.S. 691, 23 S.Ct. 456, 47 L.Ed. 657; Roberts v. Reilly, 116 U.S. 80, 6 S.Ct. 291, 29 L.Ed. 544; 22 Am. Jur., p. 290, Sec. 52, p. 289, Sec. 51, Note 10.”

There are several bills of exception found in the record upon which it is not necessary to write since it is presumed that the Governor’s action, in the absence of a contrary showing, is correct and that he has legally performed his duty. See Ex parte Gordon, 118 Tex.Cr.R. 150, 37 S.W.2d 1023; Ex parte Wells, 108 Tex.Cr.R. 57, 298 S.W. 904; Ex parte Haynes, 98 Tex.Cr.R. 609, 267 S.W. 490; Ex parte Roselle, 87 Tex.Cr.R. 267, 222 S.W. 248; Ex parte Carroll, 86 Tex.Cr.R. 301, 217 S.W. 382; Ex parte Bergman, 60 Tex.Cr.R. 8, 130 S.W. 174.

The judgment will therefore be affirmed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RICARDO ALFONSO BARRERA

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 1

- 1139

[ December 22, 2021 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Indian River County ; Robyn E. Stone , Judge; L.T. Case No.

312020MM002006A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahasse e, and Mitchell A. Egber

, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

M AY

, G ERBER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
The Huntington Mortgage Company                      (LOGO)
7575 Hunington Park Drive                            HUNTINGTON MORTGAGE
Columbus, Ohio 43235                                 COMPANY


                              Report of Management

We, as members  of  management  of The  Huntington  Mortgage  Company  (HMC),  a
wholly-owned  subsidiary of The Huntington  National Bank, are  responsible  for
complying with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS
(USAP).  We are also  responsible for  establishing  and  maintaining  effective
internal  control over  compliance with the minimum  servicing  standards as set
forth in the USAP as of December 31, 1997 and for the year then ended.  Based on
this  evaluation,  we assert that during the year ended  December 31, 1997,  HMC
complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the USAP.

As of and for this same period,  HMC had in effect a fidelity bond in the amount
of $40,000,000 and an errors and omissions policy in the amount of $8,000,000.


/s/R. Frederick Taylor
R. Frederick Taylor, President


/s/Irving A. Adler
Irving A. Adler, Senior Vice President




A subsidiary of The Huntington National Bank
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from The
Bombay Company, Inc. quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the six months
ended August 2, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000096287
<NAME> THE BOMBAY COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1997
<CASH>                                           52664
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      72248
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                139569
<PP&E>                                           88655
<DEPRECIATION>                                   50880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  186648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            31868
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         38053
<OTHER-SE>                                      110295
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    186648
<SALES>                                         135974
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                135974
<CGS>                                           101494
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   146673
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1381)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9318)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3698)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5620)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5620)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form
10QSB for the quarter  ended June 30, 2000 and is  qualified  in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000937252
<NAME>                        CAREADVANTAGE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,492,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,611,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,424,000
<PP&E>                                           703,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,420,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,883,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          83,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,454,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,420,000
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,887,000
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,622,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (23,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  329,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     288,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     288,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .00



</TABLE>