alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Surge Global Energy, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on April 17, 2006 (the “Report”), I, William
      Greene, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.









By:  /s/
      William Greene


William
      Greene


Chief
      Financial Officer


April
      17,
      2007
Case 7:22-cr-00007-O Document 82 Filed 03/21/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 64
Case 7:22-cr-00007-O Document 82 Filed 03/21/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 65
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
financial statements in the Form 10-K of Brill Media Company, LLC for the year
ended February 29, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                          17,068,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,498,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (272,000)
<INVENTORY>                                        563,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,368,000
<PP&E>                                          22,906,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,428,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,560,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,001,000
<BONDS>                                        131,332,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (53,773,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,560,000
<SALES>                                         42,819,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,819,000
<CGS>                                           37,915,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,915,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,870,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,967,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,193,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       333,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,526,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                         (151,000)
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,677,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

____________

No. 23-60377

Summary Calendar

____________

Fasken Land and Minerals, Limited; Permian Basin Land 

and Royalty Owners, 

Petitioners,

versus

Nuclear Regulatory Commission; United States of 

America, 

Respondents.

______________________________

Appeal from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Agency No. 72-1051

______________________________

Before Jones, Elrod, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:

*

In September 2021 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 

issued a license to Interim Storage Partners, LLC, to establish a facility to 

store nuclear waste temporarily in Andrews County, Texas. See Texas v. 

Nuclear Regul. Comm’n, 78 F.4th 827, 833–35 (5th Cir. 2023) [hereinafter 

Texas v. NRC], reh’g en banc denied, 2024 WL 1108700 (5th Cir. Mar. 14, 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 27, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-60377 Document: 95-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/27/2024
No. 23-60377

2

2024). Texas, Fasken Land and Minerals, Ltd., (Fasken), and Permian Basin 

Land and Royalty Owners (PBLRO) petitioned this court to set aside that 

license. Id. at 834–35. In that appeal, a panel of this court first held that 

Fasken and PBLRO had standing under the Constitution and the Hobbs Act 

to challenge the NRC’s actions. Id. at 835–40. It then held that the NRC 

lacked statutory authority to issue the license. Id. at 840–44. Accordingly, 

this court granted the petitions for review and vacated the license. Id. at 844. 

The NRC filed a petition for rehearing en banc on October 24, 2023, which 

this court denied on March 14, 2024. See Texas v. Nuclear Regul. Comm’n, 

No. 21-60743, --- F.4th ----, 2024 WL 1108700 (5th Cir. Mar. 14, 2024).

Shortly before the panel issued its opinion in Texas v. NRC, Fasken 

and PBLRO filed the petition for review at issue in this case. They challenge 

a different license issued by the NRC in May 2023 to Holtec International to 

establish a facility to store nuclear waste in Lea County, New Mexico. The 

parties, correctly, agree that Texas v. NRC involved a “materially identical 

license in a materially identical procedural posture” and that “absent the 

[c]ourt granting rehearing en banc in Texas [v. NRC] . . . , the panel’s 

consideration of this case will be controlled by [Texas v. NRC].” Because this 

court’s holding in Texas v. NRC dictates the outcome here, we GRANT

Fasken’s and PBLRO’s petition for review and VACATE the Holtec 

license. The NRC’s motion to transfer the petition for review to the United 

States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is DENIED AS 

MOOT. 

Case: 23-60377 Document: 95-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/27/2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KENNETH MILLER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 357 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350**

| (1)    |   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| (2)    |   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |   |   |

|                                   |                                                                                                       |                                     |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| Date: March              17, 2008 | By:                                                                                              |  /s/              Kenneth D. Denman |
|                                   | Kenneth              D. Denman                                                                             |
|                                   | Chairman, President                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive                Officer) |
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________
N O

. 09

- 20

- 00009

- CV

__________________
GABRIEL RODRIGUEZ LOPEZ , Appellant

V.

ERIC WAYNE PHILLIPS , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 60th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. B

- 202,419

__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Gabriel Rodriguez Lopez, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal

. I n

his motion , Lopez represents the parties have reached an agreement that resolve d

their dis pute

. He filed the motion voluntarily and before this Court resolved his

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). There are no other parties to the appeal. For

these reasons, w e grant Lopez’s motion and dismiss the appeal.

A PPEAL DISMISSE D

.

PER CURIAM2 Submitted on September 2, 2020 Opinion Delivered Sep tember 3, 2020

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 20, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 20, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19A0206. MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM IN WAYCROSS, INC. v. WILLIE JEAN 

THOMAS et al..

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of MDSI Mobile Data Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Erik Dysthe, the President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman
of the Board and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act                   of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial                   condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Erik Dysthe
Erik Dysthe
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Chairman of the Board and Director

August 13, 2004
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel, October 24, 2000, 8:30 AM to October 25, 2000, 5 PM, Ramada Inn, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 17, 2000, 65 FR 61346.                

The meeting will be held at the same place on October 24, 2000, from 8:30 AM to 3 PM and reconvene that day at 3:30 PM to recess and then the meeting will reconvene on October 25, 2000, at 8:30 AM to adjournment. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: October 24, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-28114  Filed 11-01-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for t he 1 

### District of Nebraska. ___________ No. 96-2274

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Ap peal from the United State s
v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Virgil Haskins, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 18, 1996 Filed: October 22, 1996

___________ Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Virgil Haskins appeals the 70-month sentence imposed by the district court after he pleaded guilty to conspiring, between January 1991 an d

1 January1994, to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base. We affirm. Haskins's presentence report recommended a total offense level of 25, a Category III criminal history, and a Guideline s sentencing range of 70 to 87 months. Haskins objected to the recommended assessment of one criminalhistory point for a March 1992 conviction for possessing less than one ounc e of ma rijuana; one point for a March 1995 conviction for possessing dru g parapherna lia and less than one ounce of marijuana; and two points fo r another March 1995

### -2-

convic tionfor obstructing the administration of law and possessing les s than one ounce of marijuana. He argued that possession of marijuana wa s "re levant conduct" to the instant conspiracy offense, and that the cour t should consider the weight of the marijuana as part of the drug-quantit y calculation, rather than give him criminal-history points for thes e convictions. The court overruled his objection.

In determining whether conduct that resulted in a conviction should aff ect a defendant's base offense level rather than his criminal histor y category, a court should consider several factors, including the temporal and geographic proximity of the offenses; whether there were common victims , accomplices, or purposes; and whether there was a common criminal plan or intent. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3, comment. (n.9); United States v. Blumberg , 961 F.2d 787, 792 (8t h Cir. 1992). We conclude the district court did not clearly err in refusing to treat Haskins's marijuana convictions as relevan t conduc t, because they were not sufficiently connected to the cocain e conspiracy to warrant the conclusion that they w ere part of the same course of conduct. See United States v. Sheahan , 31 F. 3d 595, 599 (8th Cir. 1994) (standard of review); United States v. Lewis , 987 F.2d 1349, 1355-56 (8th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 210 (Monday, October 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64743-64744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27727]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Veterans' Advisory Committee on Environmental Hazards, Notice of 
Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 that a meeting of the Veterans' Advisory Committee on 
Environmental hazards will be held on Wednesday and Thursday, November 
29-30, 2000, in room 430 of VA Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, DC 20420. The meting will convene at 9:00 a.m. and 
adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on both days.
    The purpose of the meeting is to review information relating to the 
health effects of exposure to ionizing radiation. The major items on 
the agenda for both days will be discussions and analyses of medical 
and scientific papers concerning the health effects of

[[Page 64744]]

exposure to ionizing radiation. On the basis of their analyses and 
discussions, the Committee may make recommendations to the Secretary 
concerning diseases that are the result of exposure to ionizing 
radiation. The agenda for the second day will include planning future 
Committee activities and assignment of tasks among the members.
    The meeting is open to the public on both days. Those who wish to 
attend should contact Ersie Farber-Collins of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs, Compensation and Pension Service, 810 Vermont Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, DC 20420, prior to November 27, 2000. Ms. Farber-
Collins may also be reached at 202-273-7268.
    Members of the public may submit written questions or prepared 
statements for review by the Advisory Committee in advance of the 
meeting. Submitted material must be received at least five (5) days 
prior to the meeting and should be sent to Ms. Farber-Collins' 
attention at the address given above. Those who submit material may be 
asked to clarify it prior to its consideration by the Advisory 
Committee.

    Dated: October 23, 2000.
    By Direction of the Secretary.
Marvin Eason,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-27727 Filed 10-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
**Exhibit 10.2**
**Certification****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002****(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

      Pursuant  to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of  section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned  officers of United Utilities PLC, an English public limited company (the “Company”),  does hereby certify, to such officers’ knowledge, that:

      The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2003 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: June 9, 2003/s/ John Roberts                     John Edward Roberts Chief Executive    Dated: June 9, 2003/s/ Simon Batey                      Simon George Batey Group Finance Director
      The  foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter  63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form  20-F or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information which
has been extracted from the September 30, 1998 financial
statements, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to said
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                      1,478
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,631
<PP&E>                                             602
<DEPRECIATION>                                     270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,752
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,317)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,454
<SALES>                                         51,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,074
<CGS>                                           52,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,021
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,712)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,712)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,712)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)
        

</TABLE>
RECEIVED

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

t^!\sKA ^^ ^ tw iwt of-

;OURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ^ / f ^ / ^ _ AUG 19 2015

lJU\Kn Ok t^ hV4t^A^IL.

Abel AC°Sta' ^W Vn ^\f.

^l ^W. U^-^l ^^ \& \sA \ Wc Mtw fc>U

OS;'/;

s

ki&fc \A A«A e^U W V> wW ^ \&W \^W AW m**-

%ik^ & c^^ukw\ Wfeitetb ad^Qidok' tetoiste

iWi Wta ^M, ii<^*& vM -^A&A V^ W\Gku A Vu

ft. WUU\ k^c,\ a Lv\ %ks Uv k^\ Auk