alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-40291

Summary Calendar

__________________

OSCAR HOUSTON,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL WILSON, Senior Warden at the

Michael Unit, ET AL.,

 Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CV-925

- - - - - - - - - -

July 12, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Oscar Houston, Texas inmate #577318, appeals the dismissal

of his habeas petition for failure to exhaust state habeas

remedies. Houston argues that the district court erred by

dismissing the petition for failure to exhaust and by failing to

sever his habeas claims from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims. 

Houston contends that several of the named respondents have
No. 96-40291

-2-

retaliated against him for pursuing this case. We have carefully

reviewed the record and the appellate arguments. We conclude

that the district court did not abuse its discretion by

dismissing on exhaustion grounds. Houston's § 1983 retaliation

claim is not properly before this court because it was raised in

a postjudgment motion and Houston did not amend his notice of

appeal after the district court disposed of the postjudgment

motions. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Reeves v. Collins, 27 F.3d

174, 177 (5th Cir. 1994).

All pending motions are DENIED.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

YOEL WEISSHAUS, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 

 §

STEVE COY TEICHELMAN, and §

100th JUDICIAL DISTRICT, §

 §

Defendants. §

 

MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: 

COMES NOW YOEL WEISSHAUS, Plaintiff and files this Motion to Transfer 

Venue and will respectfully show unto the Court as follows:

I. 

Background

1. Plaintiff filed his Original Complaint on March 2, 2022, in the Northern 

District of Texas, Dallas Division.

2. Plaintiff mistakenly submitted the filing to the Northern District of Texas, 

Dallas Division. 

3. The proper venue is the Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division.

4. Plaintiff’s mistake was inadvertent, and it is in the best interest of justice to 

transfer this case to the proper venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404. 

Case 3:22-cv-00494-M Document 6 Filed 03/02/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 50
II.

Prayer

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff prays that the case be 

transferred to the Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Scott H. Palmer

SCOTT H. PALMER,

Texas Bar No. 00797196

/s/ James P. Roberts

JAMES P. ROBERTS,

Texas Bar No. 24105721

SCOTT H. PALMER, P.C.

15455 Dallas Parkway, Suite 540

Addison, Texas 75001

Telephone: 214.987.4100

Facsimile: 214.922.9900

scott@scottpalmerlaw.com

james@scottpalmerlaw.com

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 3:22-cv-00494-M Document 6 Filed 03/02/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 51
-P^^7>10W^^ ^ O^Longhorn 

Helicopters, /nc. 

4650 John Carrell Rd. 

Oenton Municipal Airport (KOTO) 

Denton, TX 76207 

Novembe 19,2010 

www.longhomhelicopters.com 

valerie@hangar10.org 

817-491-3636 

817-657-4725 

940-387-2193 

US Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

m 

I 

> 

•P Q 

—;c o :x3 

- O c/:> 

Our company is requesting exemption frran sections 14 CFR part 121, apf»ndices I and J. 

Our business office is located at 10 Hayes Court 

Trophy Club, TX 76262 

Fax: 817491-3636 

We would prefer to combine both our drug and alcohol programs for Part 135 and 91.147 operations. We request this relief 

due to the fact that we are a small business and would find it more manageable to have all employees in one program. This 

would eliminate ttie need to test the exact same employees who may fall under both operations in our company. This would 

benefit the public because all of our employee pilots will be tested regularly along with our Part 135 pilots/mechanics. If 

granted, this exemption would in no way affect the safety of either of our operations.. 

We will not be exercising this privilege outside of the United States of America. 

Valerie Williamson, President 

l_onghom Helicopters, Inc.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 20 10

- NM

- 169

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LAUREN MORENO a/k/a LAUREN EHRLICH,

Appellant,

v.

HOWARD S. EHRLICH,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1518

[August 12, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Tarlika Navarro, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07-12450 FMCE.

Bart A. Houston of The Houston Firm, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellant.

Stuart N. House of Stuart N. House, P.A., Coral Springs, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.2

PC MALL, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PC Mall, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Theodore R. Sanders, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                       
|-----------------------
|May 11, 2006           
|                       
|/s/ Theodore R. Sanders
|Theodore R. Sanders    
|Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# “FEDERAL REGISTER” CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

65 FR 65843; 65 FR 64687.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING:

1 p.m., Wednesday, November 1, 2000.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

The open meeting previously scheduled for 1 p.m., Wednesday, November 1, 2000 has been postponed until 1 p.m., Monday, November 6, 2000.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean A. Webb, 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-28351  Filed 11-1-00; 11:24 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-1872-11

EX PARTE JUAN CARPIO-CRUZ, Appellant

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS

EL PASO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to a plea agreement, the Appellant pled guilty in 2009 to possession of a

controlled substance. The following year, he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

claiming that his counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to advise him that his

guilty plea would result in deportation. The trial court granted relief and the Court of Appeals

affirmed. Ex parte Carpio-Cruz, No. 08-10-00240-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso 2011). The State

has filed a petition for discretionary review contending the Court of Appeals erred in holding
(1) Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010), applies retroactively to the collateral review of

a state conviction that was final when the Padilla opinion was issued, and (2) the Court of

Appeals erred in holding that Carpio-Cruz pleaded and proved the prejudice prong of

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).

The U.S. Supreme Court recently held that, under Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288

(1989), Padilla does not have retroactive effect. Chaidez v. United States, 133 S.Ct. 1103

(2013). Today, we adopted that Court’s reasoning as a matter of state law in Ex parte De Los

Reyes, No. PD-1457-11, __ S.W.3d __ (Tex. Crim. App. March 20, 2013).

The Court of Appeals in the instant case did not have the benefit of our opinion in Ex

parte De Los Reyes. Therefore, we grant the State’s petition for discretionary review, vacate

the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand this case to the Court of Appeals in light

of Ex parte De Los Reyes.

Delivered March 20, 2013

Do Not Publish
Order entered March 5, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05
- 13
- 01424
- CR SAWEAT JINTANONT, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12
- 45928
- I


### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record in this appeal within TWENTY
- ONE DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gar y Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

ALLEN KELSO §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-cv-00024-Z

Plaintiff §

§

VS. §

§

JCHL PROPERTIES, LLC §

§

Defendant §

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

PLEASE BE ADVISED that the parties in this case, ALLEN KELSO

Plaintiff and JCHL PROPERTIES, LLC Defendant have reached a resolution of 

Plaintiff’s claims and pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), requests dismissal of all claims 

against Defendant in their entirety and with prejudice.

STIPULATION

It is stipulated by and between the parties hereto that this action be dismissed with 

prejudice as to all parties and as to all causes of action with each party to bear their own 

attorney’s fees and costs.

DATED: May 23, 2022 FOR ALLEN KELSO, Plaintiff

BY: /S/ R. Bruce Tharpe________

R. Bruce Tharpe

PO Box 101

Olmito, Texas 78575

(956) 255-5111 - Office

(956) 599-2596 - Fax

Texas State Bar ID No. 19823800

Case 2:22-cv-00024-Z Document 14 Filed 05/24/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 84
Federal Bar ID 13098

DATED: May 23, 2022 FOR JCHL PROPERTIES, LLC

Defendant

BY: /s/ Rhett J. Hubbard___

Rhett J. Hubbard

FARRIS PARKER & HUBBARD

PO Box 9620

Amarillo, Texas 79105-9620

(806) 374-5317 - office

(806) 372-2107 – fax

Email: rhubbard@pf-lawfirm.com

Case 2:22-cv-00024-Z Document 14 Filed 05/24/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 85
#### LANCASTER v. LANCASTER.

No. 2154.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

June 13, 1941.

Fred O. Jaye, of De Leon, for appellant.

Oscar Callaway, of Comanche, for ap-pellee.

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

This is a suit by Bessie Lancaster against James Edward Lancaster for divorce, custody of children, and adjustment of property rights. The judgment below was in favor of the plaintiff and the defendant has appealed.

Appellant has filed no briefs in the case and the appeal will, therefore, be dismissed upon the authority of Haynes v. J. M. Radford Groc. Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811. It is so ordered.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL CHEATOM,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 84 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
September 2, 2010 

Mr. Todd D. Ramaly 

RCRA Programs Section 

Land and Chemicals Division 

U.S. EPA Region 5 

77 West Jackson Boulevard 

Chicago, IL 60604-3590 

Dear Mr. Todd Ramaly, 

Mr. David Yarberry has been in correspondence with you in requesting a name change 

for the delisting of F006 waste from the American Steel Cord facility in Scottsburg, 

Indiana. The minor changes that have been made to the facility and processes have been 

documented in the correspondence. Please accept the statement below as certification for 

these changes. 

I certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the 

information submitted in this demonstration and all attached documents, and that, based 

on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, 

I believe that the submitted information is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that 

there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility 

of fine and imprisonment. 

Sincerely, 

Nick Tokunaga 

Vice President of Operations - Scottsburg
#### STUBEE v. STATE.

No. 25899.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 11, 1952.

No attorney for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $500.

*627The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All of the proceedings appear regular; and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections                           ( print page 64980)                        552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Integrated Review Group, Tropical Medicine and Parasitology Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         October 19-20, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 am to 5:00 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn Bethesda, Versailles IV Room, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jean Hickman, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4194, MSC 7808, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1146.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 18, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-27886 Filed 10-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Ex parte EARP.

No. 25612.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 21, 1951.

*698No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from the order of the judge of the District Court of Smith County,' refusing to discharge appellant, upon writ of habeas corpus, from arrest and restraint by virtue of a capias pro fine issued out of the County Court of Smith County.

The record’ is without statement of facts or bills of exception.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P E A LS E LE V EN T HC IR C U IT MAY 21, 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK

Honora ble J . Owen F orre ster, United States District Judge f or the Nor

thern District of * Georg ia, sitting by

designation. [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 06- 16017

________________________ D . C . D ocketN o. 05 -004 99 -C V -W S -B B R E N D A L . M O R G A N , P la in tif f - A p p e lla n t, v ersu s N O R T H M I S S I S S I P P I M E D I C A L C E N T E R , I N C ., D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lle e .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e So u th e r n D i s tr i c to f A l a b a ma

_________________________ ( M ay 21, 2007) Be f o r e ED M O N D SO N , Ch i e f J u d g e , H U LL, Ci r c u i tJ u d g e , a n d FO RRESTER, * D i stri ctJudg e. P E R C U R I A M:2

A ft erre vi ew and o ra l ar gu m ent , the C ou rtaf fi rm s the grantof sum m ary ju d g m en t i n fa v o r o f th e D ef en d an t-A p p ellee o n all o f th e P lain ti ff -A p p ellan t’ s cl ai m s f or the re as on s out l i ned i n t he di stri ctcourt ’ s tho roug h and w el l -r ea soned or de r s of O c t obe r12, 2006, a nd D e c e m be r2, 2005. AF F I RME D.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                EXHIBIT 21
                            SUBSIDIARIES

Acadian Consultants Corp.
ACT Medical Record Services, Inc.
APS Services Acquisition Corp.
Associate Record Technician Services Acquisition Corp.
B&B (Baltimore-Washington) Acquisition Corp.
California Medical Record Service Acquisition Corp.
CH Acquisition Corp.
Computer Central Corporation
Copyright Acquisition Corp.
Creative Mailings, Inc.
DeBari Associates Acquisition Corp.
Delaware Major Acquisition Corp.
Deliverex Acquisition Corp.
Deliverex Sacramento Acquisition Corp.
DISC Acquisition Corp.
Doctex Acquisition Corp.
DPAS Acquisition Corp.
Eagle Legal Services Acquisition Corp.
Economic Research Services, Inc.
F.Y.I. Corporate Acquisition Corp.
F.Y.I. Direct Inc.
F.Y.I. Image Inc.
F.Y.I. Input Inc.
F.Y.I. Integration Solutions, Inc.
F.Y.I. Print Inc.
F.Y.I. Records Inc.
F.Y.I. Storage Inc.
Imagent Acquisition Corp.
Information Management Acquisition Corp.
Input of Texas, Inc.
Leonard Archives Acquisition Corp.
Lifo Systems, Inc.
MAVRICC Management Systems, Inc.
Medicopy Acquisition Corp.
Microfilm Distribution Services, Inc.
Micro Publication Systems, Inc.
Minnesota Medical Record Service Acquisition Corp.
MMS Escrow and Transfer Agency, Inc.
Permanent Records Acquisition Corp.
Premier Acquisition Corp.
QCS Inet Acquisition Corp.
Quality Copy Acquisition Corp.
RAC (California) Acquisition Corp.
Recordex Acquisition Corp.
Researchers Acquisition Corp.
Robert A. Cook Acquisition Corp.
Texas Medical Record Service Acquisition Corp.
The Rust Consulting Group, Inc.
ZIA Information Analysis Group, Inc.
Zip Shred Canada Acquisition Corp.