alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AXEDA SYSTEMS INC.



Exhibit 32.1 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer required pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
furnished herewith pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Axeda Systems Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ended  December 31, 2003, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on March 24, 2004 (the Report),  the undersigned,  Robert M.
Russell Jr.,  Chairman of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company
and Thomas J. Fogarty,  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:     /s/ Robert M. Russell Jr.
        ----------------------------
        Robert M. Russell Jr.
        Chairman of the Board and
        Chief Executive Officer
        March 24, 2004

By:     /s/ Thomas J. Fogarty
        ----------------------------
        Thomas J. Fogarty
        Executive Vice President and
        Chief Financial Officer
        March 24, 2004


This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Axeda Systems Inc. and will be retained by Axeda Systems Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 10.22


 


Summary of Compensation Payable to Named Executive Officers


 


The Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors of Yahoo! Inc. approved the annual base salaries
(effective January 1, 2006) of Yahoo!’s executive officers for 2006.  The following table shows the annual base
salary for 2006 of our Chief Executive Officer and four most highly compensated
other executive officers (based on their total annual salary and bonus
compensation during 2005), also referred to as the Named Executive Officers.


 


 


	
  Name and Principal Position

  	
   

  	
  Salary*

  	
   

  
	
  Terry S. Semel 

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  **

  
	
  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Susan Decker 

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  500,000

  	
   

  
	
  Executive Vice President, Finance and
  Administration, and Chief Financial Officer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Daniel L. Rosensweig 

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  500,000

  	
   

  
	
  Chief Operating Officer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Farzad Nazem 

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  450,000

  	
   

  
	
  Chief Technical Officer and Executive Vice
  President, Engineering and Site Operations

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Michael J. Callahan 

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  325,000

  	
   

  
	
  Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
  Secretary

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


In addition to receiving base
salary, Yahoo!’s Named Executive Officers are eligible to receive an annual
bonus based on individual performance and Yahoo!’s overall achievement of its
financial plan.


 


Equity compensation plan grants
to Yahoo!’s Named Executive Officers are reported on Form 4 filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


 






*                                         Mr.
Callahan’s base salary increased from $300,000 to $325,000.  The base salaries for Ms. Decker, and for
Messrs. Rosensweig and Nazem, did not increase from the level in effect for
2005.


 


**                                  Mr.
Semel’s 2006 rate of base salary has not yet been determined by the
Compensation Committee.  He is currently
paid at his 2005 rate of base salary, $600,000.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3547 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2013 

Received 

AN ACT 

To extend the application of certain space launch liability 

provisions through 2014. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3547 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Space Launch Liability 

3 Indemnification Extension Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INDEMNIFICATION EXTENSION. 

5 Section 50915(f) of title 51, United States Code, is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘December 31, 2014’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 2, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**WASHINGTON FEDERAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**EXHIBIT 32**

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**WASHINGTON FEDERAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Washington Federal, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that to the undersigned’s best knowledge and belief: 

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(b) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated this10th day of May 2010. 

 
Washington Federal, Inc.(Company)/s/ Roy M. WhiteheadROY M. WHITEHEADChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Brent J. BeardallBRENT J. BEARDALLExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.01
CERTIFICATIONS
I, John C. Harris, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Viseon, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.    Date: May 16, 2005    /s/ John C. Harris   John C. Harris
# Status

B November 31, 2009

Current Enrollment General 26.74 mil. ac.

(Not including FY 2011 contracts) Continuous (non-CREP) 3.23 mil. ac.

CREP 1.17 mil. ac.

Total 31.15 mil. ac.

Change in Enrollment Since Last Year Down 2.6 million acres.

Continuous Sign-up FY 2009 signup (#37) stands at 432,000 acres.

Projects to end up at 460,000 acres.

Average Rental Payments General Sign-up $45 per acre

Continuous (non-CREP) $92 per acre

CREP $129 per acre

All CRP $53 per acre

FY 2010 Projected Outlays Rental Payments $1,740 million

(Apportioned) Cost-Share $107 million

Incentives (SIP & PIP) $62 million

Total (not including TA) $1,909 million

Performance Measures Wetland Restoration Practices 85,511 acres

(Year-to-Date) Conservation Buffer Practices 41,246 acres

Expiration Schedule Sept 30, 2009 2.8 mil. ac.

(Including continuous and general) Sept 30, 2010 4.5 mil. ac.

Sept 30, 2011 4.4 mil. ac.

Sept 30, 2012 6.5 mil. ac.

Sept 30, 2013 3.3 mil. ac.

Initiatives (and Goals) Practice

Code In November

(Acres) Year-to-Date

(Acres) Cumulative

(Acres)

Upland bird habitat buffers (250,000 ac.) CP33 1,516 4,033 215,800

Bottomland hardwood trees (500,000 ac.) CP31 1,083 1,938 53,160

Non-flood plain and playa wetlands (250,000 ac.) CP23a 3,793 8,009 80,538

Flood-plain wetlands (500,000 ac.) CP23 6,059 8,908 152,479

Longleaf pine plantings (250,000 ac.) CP36 1,154 2,551 78,255

Prairie pothole duck nesting habitat (100,000 ac.) CP37 1,642 2,645 85,113

State acres for wildlif e enhancement (500,000 ac.) CP38 3,364 14,414 240,933
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,881,689
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  361,569
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,780,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                 794,781
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,228,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          399,443
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,829,109
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,228,552
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               817,559
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               810,357
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,242
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,242
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,242
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
August 6, 2010 

Eleanor Ku Codding, P.E. 

Eastern Research Group, Inc. 

14555 Avion Parkway, Suite 200 

Chantilly, VA 20151-1102 

Subject: Carolina Power & Light Company d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. 

 H.F. Lee Steam Electric Plant 

 Response to EPA’s CWA Section 308 and RCRA Section 3007 

Information Request 

 

Dear Ms. Codding: 

On June 10, 2010 Carolina Power & Light Company d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, 

Inc. (PEC) H.F. Lee Steam Electric Plant located in Wayne County, North Carolina, 

received notification of the Information Request from the Environmental Protection 

Agency’ s (EPA’s) Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. Response to this 

request is being submitted by August10, 2010, as agreed upon by EPA and PEC. 

PEC’s response to the request, enclosed, consists of hard copies of associated maps and 

electronic copies of the response text and associated Appendices. All maps are marked 

with their respective scales and primary features on the maps are identified with numbers 

corresponding to their identification as a management area per Question 3 of the 

response. The electronic files are provided as portable document format (pdf) files, 

created using Adobe Acrobat® 8 Standard, Version 8.1.3. The following files are 

included: 

1. EPA CWA RCRA Response_PEC_Lee; 104 kilobytes (KB), created August 5, 

2010, 4:59 p.m. 

2. EPA CWA RCRA Response_PEC_Lee_Figures; 12,187 KB, created August 5, 

2010, 5:26 p.m. 

3. EPA CWA RCRA Response_PEC_Lee_Appendices; 62,393 KB, created 

August 5, 2010, 3:22 p.m. 

If you have any questions please contact Mr. Fred Holt at (919) 546-5286. 
EPA CWA RCRA Response 

Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., H.F. Lee Plant 

August 6, 2010 

Page 2 

I certify, under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my 

direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel 

properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or 

persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, 

the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I 

am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the 

possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations. 

Sincerely, 

Kris Edmondson 

Plant Manager, Lee Plant 

Enclosures 

KE/mmm 

cc: Ricky Miller 

 Fred Holt
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Frank F.Khulusi,****certify that:

1.         I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of PC Mall, Inc.;

2.         Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this ** **report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.         Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)         evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)         disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant'sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.         Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)         allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting.
#### TOLSON v. WOLFE COUNTY FISCAL COURT et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 9, 1951.

*667Leebern Allen, 'Campton, for appellant.

E. E. Bach, J. Douglas Graham, Camp-ton, for appellees.

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment holding that an order of the Fiscal Court of Wolfe County does not limit or interfere with the rights or duties of the jailer of that County. The order recites:

“Ordered by the Court that a curb be placed on all orders that are needed to be made for supplies for the Jail and Courthouse, in the future there must be at least the approval of two members of the Fiscal Court, before an order is to be made for said supplies.”

Under KRS 67.080, the management of the fiscal affairs of a county is vested in the fiscal court. KRS 67.130 provides that the jailer shall be superintendent of the public square and all public buildings at the county seat. The fiscal court is required to appropriate an amount sufficient to maintain those buildings. The sums so appropriated shall be expended by the jailer.

In commenting upon the foregoing statutes, we said in the case of Ball v. Scott, 281 Ky. 449, 136 S.W.2d 48, that a fiscal court could conduct business affairs in such a manner as to deprive a jailer of the right of the corporeal possession of all the appropriations made for his office. The jailer has no right to expend the funds appropriated to his office on his own initiative and in the exercise of his individual discretion. The power of the fiscal court is superior to the authority of the jailer. The jailer may not expend the funds appropriated to his office free from any control of the fiscal court.

While the order adopted by the Wolfe County Fiscal Court may be cumbersome from an administrative point of view, it clearly falls within the reasoning of the Ball opinion.

Judgment affirmed.
#### STATE v. SNEED et al. SAME v. PAN-AMERICAN PRODUCTION CO. et al.

Nos. A-332, A-333.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Nov. 15, 1944.

See, also, 184 S.W.2d 665.

Grover Sellers, Atty. Gen., and Gaynor Kendall, Geo. W. Barcus, Fagan Dickson, •and Ocie Speer, Asst. Attys. Gen., for 'petitioner in both cases.

Vinson, Elkins, Weems & Francis, of Houston, for respondents Sneed et al.

Turner, Rodgers & Winn, Carlton R. Winn, and George S. Terry, all of Dallas, ■and Donald Campbell and L. A. Thompson, both of Tulsa, Old., for respondent S'tan-olind Oil & Gas Co.

Rex G. Baker, R. E. Seagler, and Ralph B. Lee, all of Houston, for respondent Plumble Oil & Refining Co.

Baker, Botts, Andrews & Wharton and Norman M. West, all of Houston, for respondent Pan-American Production Co.

Smith & Smith and Myron A. Smith, all ■of Fort Worth, for respondent Southland Royalty Co.

Carlos B. Masterson, of Angleton, for respondents Hiram Moore et al.

Lewis H. Follett, of Angleton, for respondents Follett et al.

ALEXANDER, Chief Justice.

On the 18th day of October, 1944, we refused applications for writs of error in the above cases. The applications were refused because we were of the opinion that the State’s suits to recover the land were barred by the one-year statute of limitation. Revised Statutes, Art. 5329, § 4; Caples v. Cole, 129 Tex. 370, 102 S.W.2d 173, 104 S.W.2d 3.

The motions for rehearing are overruled.
**Exhibit 9.1**

----

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by    reference in Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-13182 of United    Utilities plc on Form F-3 of our report dated June 1, 2006 (which report    expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an emphasis of matter paragraph    relating to the differences between International Financial Reporting Standards    as adopted for use in the European Union and accounting principles generally    accepted in the United States of America, as described in Note 33) relating    to the consolidated financial statements appearing in this Annual Report    on Form 20-F of United Utilities plc for the year ended March 31, 2006.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPManchester, United Kingdom1 June 2006

----