alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 2.04

                               ARTICLES OF MERGER

                                       OF

                    AMERICAN SURGICAL SUPPLY CORP. OF FLORIDA
                      D/B/A AMERICAN MICRO COMPUTER CENTER

                                      INTO

                        AMERICAN MICRO ACQUISITION CORP.

        Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 607, Florida Statutes, the parties
hereto hereby adopt the following  Articles of Merger for the purpose of merging
them into one corporation:

        1.  AMERICAN  SURGICAL  SUPPLY CORP.  OF FLORIDA  D/B/A  AMERICAN  MICRO
COMPUTER CENTER, a Florida  corporation  (the "Merging  Corporation"),  shall be
merged with and into AMERICAN MICRO  ACQUISITION  CORP.,  a Florida  corporation
(the "SURVIVING  CORPORATION"),  which shall be the surviving corporation in the
merger.

        2. The merger shall become effective on the date on which these Articles
of Merger are filed with the Florida Department of State (the "EFFECTIVE DATE").

        3. The Articles of  Incorporation  of the  Surviving  Corporation  as in
effect  immediately prior to the Effective Date shall remain and be the Articles
of Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation.

        4. The Plan of  Merger,  a copy of which is  attached  hereto and made a
part hereof,  was adopted and approved by the directors and  shareholders of the
Merging  Corporation on June 29, 1999 and the Surviving  Corporation on June 29,
1999.

        5. The name of the  Surviving  Corporation  after  the  Merger  shall be
AMERICAN MICRO COMPUTER CENTER, INC.

        IN  WITNESS   WHEREOF,   the  Surviving   Corporation  and  the  Merging
Corporation  have  caused  these  Articles  of  Merger to be  executed  by their
respective officers as of June 29, 1999.

AMERICAN SURGICAL SUPPLY CORP.                 AMERICAN MICRO ACQUISITION
OF FLORIDA D/B/A AMERICAN MICRO                CORP.
COMPUTER CENTER

By:     /s/ John B. Gallagher                  By:   /s/ Harry D. Shields
   ----------------------------------              -----------------------------
        Name:  John B. Gallagher                     Name:  Harry D. Shields
        Its:   President                             Its:   President
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERSON ECHEVERRIA,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 17

- 71751

Agency No. A095

- 750

- 694

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 8 , 2022 * *

Before: WALLACE, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Gerson Echeverria , a native and citizen of Guatemala , petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Imm igration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen removal proceedings and his motion to reconsider the denial of sua sponte

reopening

. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 13 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 17

- 71751

of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen or to reconsider. Mohammed v.

Gonzales , 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

Echeverria does not challenge , and therefore waives, the BIA’s

determination s that the motion to reopen and motion to reconsider were untimely,

the motion to reopen was number

- barred, he did not establish a regulatory

exception to the time limitation for filing a motion to reopen, and he did not raise a

fact ual or legal error to warrant reconsideration

. See Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder

, 706

F.3d 1072, 1079

- 80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a

party’s opening brief are waived). Echeverria also waives a challenge to the denial

of reopening based on ineffective assistance of counsel and error by the

immigratio n judge

. See Nguyen v. Barr , 983 F.3d 1099, 1102 (9th Cir. 2020)

(petitioner waived review of issue raised for the first time in reply brief)

.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Echeverria’s motion to

reconsider where he failed to identify any error of law or fact in the BIA’s prior

decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1); Ma v. Ashcroft , 361 F.3d 553, 558 (9th Cir.

2004) (“A petitioner’s motion to reconsider must identify a legal or factual error in

the BIA’s prior decision.”)

.

We do not consider the materials Echeverria reference s and submits for the

first time in his reply brief that are not part of the administrative record. See Fisher

v. INS , 79 F.3d 955, 963

- 64 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc).3 17

- 71751

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael J. Murry, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Catalytica Energy Systems, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Catalytica Energy Systems, Inc.



By:

/s/    MICHAEL J.
MURRYName:

Michael J. MurryTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

March 28, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) ORBIT
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               2
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     2
<PP&E>                                             291
<DEPRECIATION>                                      44
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,344
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           316
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,579)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       330
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     7
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (295)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (295)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (295)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Jinpan
International Limited (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Mark Du, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

                 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company.



Date: July 14, 2004                              /s/ Mark Du
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Mark Du
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3096 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3096

      To designate the building occupied by the Federal Bureau of 
  Investigation located at 801 Follin Lane, Vienna, Virginia, as the 
           ``Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2013

    Mr. Connolly (for himself, Mr. Hanna, Mr. Wolf, and Mr. Moran) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To designate the building occupied by the Federal Bureau of 
  Investigation located at 801 Follin Lane, Vienna, Virginia, as the 
           ``Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The building occupied by the Federal Bureau of Investigation 
located at 801 Follin Lane, Vienna, Virginia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center'' 
during the period in which the building is occupied by the Federal 
Bureau of Investigation.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    During the period in which the building referred to in section 1 is 
occupied by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, any reference in a 
law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to that building shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        5934
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               334240
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  88148
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            579504
<PP&E>                                      180699
<DEPRECIATION>                              111231
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              903297
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       192290
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     12564
<OTHER-SE>                                  633443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                903297
<SALES>                                     955811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            955811
<CGS>                                       542547
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               307879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             231910
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         105385
<DISCONTINUED>                              127065
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                231910
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.01****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Viseon, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (“Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifiespursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to my knowledge:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     */s/ John C. Harris*       John C. Harris    Chief Executive Officer  Date: November 14, 2005     This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 be deemed tobe filed by the Company pursuant to Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3455 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

201 East Pikes Peak Avenue in Colorado Springs, Colorado, as the 

‘‘Chaplain (Capt.) Dale Goetz Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2013 

Mr. LAMBORN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 201 East Pikes Peak Avenue in Colorado 

Springs, Colorado, as the ‘‘Chaplain (Capt.) Dale Goetz 

Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHAPLAIN (CAPT.) DALE GOETZ MEMORIAL 

4 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 201 East Pikes Peak Avenue in 

7 Colorado Springs, Colorado, shall be known and desVerDate Mar 15 2010 20:13 Nov 13, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3455.IH H3455

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3455 IH

1 ignated as ‘‘Chaplain (Capt.) Dale Goetz Memorial Post 

2 Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Chaplain (Capt.) Dale 

7 Goetz Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6652

RYRICKA NIKITA CUSTIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District 

Judge. (2:13-cv-00302-MSD-TEM)

Submitted: July 29, 2014 Decided: August 1, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ryricka Nikita Custis, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Hyman Katz, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ryricka Nikita Custis seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on Custis’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Custis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We further deny Custis’ 

motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument 
3

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D21-1143

_____________________________

AKEEM COLLINS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County.

David W. Green, Judge.

September 14, 2022

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, C.J., and B.L. THOMAS and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Akeem Collins, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,492
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,174
<INVENTORY>                                      1,154
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,722
<PP&E>                                          33,522
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,482
<BONDS>                                          4,660
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           103
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,387
<SALES>                                          6,228
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,176
<CGS>                                            4,524
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,993
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (388)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,155
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,511
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,668
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,843
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,843
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PART 1
OF FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.   
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000937136
<NAME>                        HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS                 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        21105
<SECURITIES>                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                 63086
<ALLOWANCES>                      0
<INVENTORY>                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             213955
<PP&E>                        45744
<DEPRECIATION>                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               399232
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        469243
<BONDS>                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0
<PREFERRED>                       0
<COMMON>                       5597
<OTHER-SE>                  (75608)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 399232
<SALES>                      156003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             156003
<CGS>                        147738
<TOTAL-COSTS>                147738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             135777
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             1340
<INCOME-PRETAX>            (128852)                  
<INCOME-TAX>                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>        (128852)
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>               (128852)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
Customer Service Hotline: 1

- 800

- 438

- 2474 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

- 2029

September 29, 2014

Mr. David K. Paylor , Director

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

629 East Main Street,

Richmond, Vir ginia 23219

Dear Mr. Paylo r :

On July 23 , 2014

, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision

to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of Environmental

Quality (V A DEQ ) . Th is SIP revision consists of the 2011 Base Year Emissions Inventory for the

Northern Virginia portion of the Washington

, DC

- MD

- VA 2008 Ozone Nonattainment Area

. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively a nd technically complete, and is

reviewing it to prepare a Not ice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR).

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Marilyn Powers

, Office of Air Program Planning

, at (215) 814

- 2 308 . She is the principal contact for this

rulemaking.

Sincerely,

/s/

Diana Esher, Director

Air Protection Division