alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection  with the Report of Nexicon,  Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended  December  31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date  August 30, 2006                   By:     /s/ Daniel Urrea
                                                --------------------
                                        Name:   Daniel Urrea
                                        Title:  Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to Nexicon,  Inc. and will
be retained by Nexicon,  Inc.  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### CULWELL et ux. v. SHANN et al.

No. 2492.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

Dec. 15, 1944.

Frank Sparks, of Eastland, for appellants.

Dabney & Dabney, of Eastland, for appel-lees.

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

Mrs. Retta Freeman Shann, joined by her husband, instituted habeas corpus proceedings against Hornet P. Culwell and wife, Louise Culwell (sister of Mrs. Shann), to obtain the custody and care of Retta’s small son, Edward Freeman, alleged to be illegally confined and restrained of his liberty by the Culwells. The Culwells claimed the mother had verbally given the child to them. That they had become attached to it and desired to keep it, and that the mother was not a proper person to have the custody and rearing of the child. The mother denied all such allegations, and alleged that she merely employed them to care for the child while she was working. That she had since married and was able to care for the child and desired its custody. On the issues thus formed the trial took place before the court and jury. This resulted in a verdict and judgment awarding the custody of the child to the plaintiffs, or its natural mother.

This appeal is predicated on four points of error, which will be disposed of in their' order:

The first point is based on the ruling of the trial court in excluding testimony. The bill of exception does not show what the testimony would have been, and, therefore, no error is disclosed. 3 Tex.Jur. p. 468, sec. 300, et seq. Apparently the evidence, had it been admitted, would have been hearsay so far as that witness was concerned. It dealt with the contents of an alleged report someone else had possibly made to the witness.

Point 2 complains that the court permitted a witness to give certain improper testimony over appellants’ objection. Since similar testimony was given by other witnesses and not objected to by the appellant, the objection, if valid, was waived. Hilliard et al. v. Watson et ux., 170 S.W.2d 310; Export Ins. Co. v. Axe et al., 36 S.W.2d 572; Hemler v. Hucony Gas Co. et al., 18 S.W.2d 942; City of San Antonio v. Potter, 31 Tex.Civ.App. 263, 71 S.W. 764; International & G. N. Ry. Co. et al. v. Kindred, 57 Tex. 491; Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Rhodabarger, 93 S.W.2d 1180; Reed et al. v. James et al., 113 S.W.2d 580; Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. v. Motley, 87 S.W.2d 551.

*538Point 3 is not briefed. Point 4 also pertains to the exclusion of testimony- and shows no error. A bill of exception to the exclusion of testimony must reflect at least what was expected to be shown by the witness. Moerbe et al. v. Beckmann, 132 S.W. 2d 616; 3 Tex.Jur. p. 468, sec. 330 et seq.

All points are overruled, and for the reasons assigned the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3543 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3543

To permanently extend the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 
and establish a private right of action to enforce compliance with such 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 2013

Mr. Ellison (for himself, Mr. Butterfield, Mr. Capuano, Mr. Cicilline, 
Ms. Clarke, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. McDermott, Mr. 
  McGovern, Mr. George Miller of California, Mr. Rangel, Ms. Loretta 
Sanchez of California, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Mr. Rush, 
    Mr. Kildee, Ms. Moore, and Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permanently extend the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 
and establish a private right of action to enforce compliance with such 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Permanently Protecting Tenants at 
Foreclosure Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUNSET PROVISION.

    Section 704 of the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 
(12 U.S.C. 5201 note; 12 U.S.C. 5220 note; 42 U.S.C. 1437f note) is 
hereby repealed.

SEC. 3. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.

    The Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009, as amended by 
section 2 of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the 
following new section:

``SEC. 704. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.

    ``(a) Right of Action.--Any person aggrieved by a violation 
referred to in subsection (b) may bring a civil action in a court of 
competent jurisdiction for damages resulting from such violation, and 
may obtain other appropriate relief, including equitable relief. If the 
plaintiff prevails in any such action, the court shall award the 
plaintiff any litigation costs reasonably incurred, together with 
reasonable attorneys' fees and reasonable expert witness fees, as 
determined by the court.
    ``(b) Violation.--A violation referred to in this subsection is a 
violation of--
            ``(1) section 702 of this title; or
            ``(2) the matter in subparagraph (C) or (F) of section 
        8(o)(7) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 
        1437f(o)(7)) that was added by the amendments made by section 
        703 of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6353
WAYNE A. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR KOLOUGO; MARY TARANASKI, Health Services Administrator; HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL; J. JONES, Registered Nurse, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-02-897-3) Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 27, 2003 Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wayne A. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Wayne A. Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to pay the initial partial filing fee as ordered. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Kolougo , No. CA-02-897-3 (E.D. Va. Feb. 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350





In connection with the Annual Report of Surge Global Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350):





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 15, 2011

/s/ E. JAMIE SCHLOSSE. Jamie SchlossChief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
a.                     *Type of Filing:*                     Notice of Intent to File Applications for New License                

                    b.                     *Project No.:*                     2233                

                    c.                     *Date Filed:*                     December 21, 1999.                

                    d.                     *Applicants:*                     Portland General Electric Company, current licensee.                

                    e.                     *Name of Project:*                     Willamette Falls Hydroelectric Project.                

                    f.                     *Location:*                     On the Willamette River in Clackamas County, Oregon.                

                    g.                     *Filed Pursuant to:*                     Section 15 of the Federal Power Act, 18 CFR 16.6 of the Commission's regulations.                

                    h.                     *Contact:*                     Julie A. Keil, Director of Hydro Licensing and Water Rights, Portland General Electric Company, 121 SW Salmon Street, Portland, OR 97204.                

                    i.                     *Expiration date of original license:*                     December 31, 2004.                

                    j. The project consists of the T.W. Sullivan Development on the west side of the Willamette Falls near the City of                     Start Printed Page 6207                    West Linn with a total installed capacity of 16 MW, and the Smurfit Development on the east side of the Willamette Falls near Oregon City with a total installed capacity of 1.5 MW.                

                    k.                     *FERC contact:*                     Hector M. Perez, (202) 219-2843.                

l. Pursuant to 18 CFR 16.9(b)(1) each application for a new license and any competing license applications must be filed with the Commission at least 24 months prior to the expiration of the existing license. All applications for license for this project must be filed by December 31, 2002.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-2783  Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>      5 
<LEGEND>    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
            FROM THE CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF March 31, 1998 AND
            THE CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
            March 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                     2,370
<SECURITIES>                               5,199
<RECEIVABLES>                              7,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                 662
<INVENTORY>                                6,010
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          22,622
<PP&E>                                     7,666
<DEPRECIATION>                             2,896
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            31,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      4,308
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5
<OTHER-SE>                                27,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              31,861
<SALES>                                   17,910
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          17,910
<CGS>                                      8,319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              8,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (203)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1,005
<INCOME-TAX>                                 402
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          603
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 603
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              $0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                              $0.12

         

</TABLE>
Commissioners: Richard A. Meserve, Chairman, Greta J. Dicus, Nils J. Diaz, Edward McGaffigan, Jr., Jeffrey S. Merrifield.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.4, notice is hereby given that Mr. Richard Baldwin, a Commission employee in Region II, Division of Reactor Safety, Operator Licensing and Human Performance Branch, has been appointed as a Commission adjudicatory employee within the meaning of section 2.4, to advise the Commission regarding issues relating to the pending petition for review of the Presiding Officer's Initial Decision, LBP-99-44. Mr. Baldwin has not previously performed any investigative or litigating function in connection with this or any related proceeding. Until such time as a final decision is issued in this matter, interested persons outside the agency and agency employees performing investigative or litigating functions in this proceeding are required to observe the restrictions of 10 CFR 2.780 and 2.781 in their communications with Mr. Baldwin.

It is so ordered.

For the Commission. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day of February, 2000.

Annette L. Vietti-Cook,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-2832 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
**Exhibit 13**

 

**Officer Certifications**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V., a *sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable* organized under the laws of Mexico (the “Company”), does hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge that:

 

The annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: April 30, 2015

 
| /S/ JUAN ANTONIO GONZÁLEZ MORENO     |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:   Juan Antonio González Moreno |   |
| Title:   Chief Executive Officer          |   |
|                                      |   |
| Date:   April 30, 2015               |   |
|                                      |   |
| /S/   HOMERO HUERTA MORENO                |   |
| Name:   Homero Huerta Moreno              |   |
| Title:   Chief Administrative Officer     |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
**Exhibit 8**

 

**List of Principal Subsidiaries**

**of**

**Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V.**

** **
| **Subsidiary**                                              | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------|
| **Gruma Corporation**                                       |       | Nevada, United States                       |
| **Azteca Milling, L.P.**                                    |       | Texas, United States                        |
| **Compañía Nacional Almacenadora, S.A. de. C.V.** |       | Mexico                                      |
| **Molinos Nacionales C.A. (Monaca)**                        |       | Venezuela                                   |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-32598, 333-39054, 333-40182, 333-48170,
333-51518, 333-54808) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-97461) of Dynabazaar, Inc. of
our report dated February 7, 2003 relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 2004
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 350 

To repeal the Legal Services Corporation Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2013 

Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia (for himself, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, and Mr. MULVANEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To repeal the Legal Services Corporation Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Legal Services Corporation Act is repealed. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with
#### POWERS v. STATE.

No. 23760.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 18, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAU.CHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was tried upon an indictment charging robbery together with two prior convictions for similar offenses and upon a jury’s verdict was sentenced to the penitentiary for life.

The allegations are regular and are fully supported by the statement of facts. Appellant offered no evidence in the case. He brings forward no bills of exception, and no brief or argument are made in his behalf.

We find no error and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
**Exhibit23.1**

 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accountants

Board of Directors

Sherwood Brands, Inc.

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (333-56460) and Form S-3 (333-92012) of our reports datedOctober 8, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofSherwood Brands, Inc. appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended July 31, 2004.

 
| BDO Seidman, LLP      |
|-----------------------|
| Bethesda, Maryland    |
|                  |
|                  |
| October 29, 2004 |

 

----
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/24

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 24 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Form 10-K for the Year ended December 31, 2005, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Omega Protein Corporation, certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Omega Protein Corporation.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 13, 2006



/s/ ROBERT W. STOCKTONRobert W. StocktonExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Omega Protein Corporation or the certifying officer for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Omega Protein Corporation and will be
retained by Omega Protein Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. R. 3534 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 113 West 

Michigan Avenue in Jackson, Michigan, as the ‘‘Officer James Bonneau Memorial 

Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. OFFICER JAMES BONNEAU MEMORIAL POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 113 West Michigan Avenue in Jackson, Michigan, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Officer James Bonneau 

Memorial Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Officer James Bonneau Memorial Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.