alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**DRAFT—SUBJECT TO CHANGE** 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON TEST PROCEDURES FOR

WALK-IN COOLERS AND WALK-IN FREEZERS 

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585 

Room 8E-089 

Wednesday, March 24, 2010 

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) seeks comments, information, and data from interested parties 

on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) addressing test procedures for walk-in coolers 

and walk-in freezers (WICF or walk-ins). The NOPR proposes new test procedures for WICF 

envelopes. The NOPR also proposes to adopt a referenced industry standard for WICF 

refrigeration systems, including materials incorporated by reference. 

Preliminary Agenda – Subject to Change at the Public Meeting

9:00 – 9:15 am Welcome, Introductions, and Agenda Review (Doug Brookman) 

9:15 – 9:30 am Rulemaking Overview (Charles Llenza)

 

Summary of the statutory background, rulemaking process, and general

issues about which DOE seeks input during today's public meeting. 

9:30 – 10:00 am Brief Opening Remarks from Interested Parties (Doug Brookman)

Interested parties are invited to make brief summary comments regarding 

the NOPR analyses and proposed test procedures. 

10:00 – 11:00 am Test Procedures Approach (Rebecca Legett and Claire Gagne) 

Presentation and discussion of DOE’s overall approach of separate WICF

test procedures for envelopes and refrigeration systems of walk-ins, 

including discussion of basic model concept. Interested parties may ask 

questions and provide feedback. 

11:00 – 11:15 am Break

11:15 – 12:30 pm Proposed Envelope Test Procedure (Eric Fitz and Claire Gagne)

Presentation and discussion of DOE’s proposed test procedure for rating

envelopes of WICF, with emphasis on issues regarding measurement of 

conduction loads. Interested parties may ask questions and provide 

feedback.

12:30 – 1:30 pm Lunch (On Your Own)

EERE-2008-BT-TP-0014 DOC ID 1.2.005
**DRAFT—SUBJECT TO CHANGE** 

1:30 – 3:15 pm Proposed Envelope Test Procedure (Eric Fitz and Claire Gagne) 

(continued)

Further presentation and discussion of DOE’s proposed test procedure for

rating envelopes of WICF, with emphasis on issues regarding 

measurement of infiltration loads, determination of electrical loads, 

calculation of energy consumption, and normalization. Interested parties 

may ask questions and provide feedback.

3:15 – 3:30 pm Break

3:30 – 4:30 pm Proposed Refrigeration System Test Procedure (Gopal 

Bandyopadhyay and Collin Weber) 

Presentation and discussion of DOE’s proposed test procedure for rating 

refrigeration systems of WICF, including industry standard incorporated 

by reference. Interested parties may ask questions and provide feedback. 

4:30 – 4:45 pm Discussion of Small Business Impacts (Rebecca Legett) 

Interested parties may ask questions and provide feedback. 

4:45 – 5:00 pm Other issues, Questions, Comments, and Closing Remarks

Interested parties may ask final questions and present closing statements at 

this time.

5:00 pm Adjourn

EERE-2008-BT-TP-0014 DOC ID 1.2.005
Executive Order 13172

# Amendment to Executive Order 13078, To Expand the Role of the National Task Force on Employment of Adults With Disabilities To Include a Focus on Youth

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, and in order to provide for improved access to employment and training for youth with disabilities, it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 13078 of March 13, 1998, is amended by adding to section 2 of that order the following new subsection to read as follows: “(h) To improve employment outcomes for persons with disabilities by addressing, among other things, the education, transition, employment, health and rehabilitation, and independent living issues affecting young people with disabilities, executive departments and agencies shall coordinate and cooperate with the Task Force to: (1) strengthen interagency research, demonstration, and training activities relating to young people with disabilities; (2) create a public awareness campaign focused on access to equal opportunity for young people with disabilities; (3) promote the views of young people with disabilities through collaboration with the Youth Councils authorized under the Workforce Investment Act of 1998; (4) increase access to and utilization of health insurance and health care for young people with disabilities through the formalization of the Federal Healthy and Ready to Work Interagency Council; (5) increase participation by young people with disabilities in postsecondary education and training programs; and (6) create a nationally representative Youth Advisory Council, to be funded and chaired by the Department of Labor, to advise the Task Force in conducting these and other appropriate activities.”

[FR Doc. 00-27892

Billing code 3195-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6488

LAMONT EUGENE COLBERT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-3846-H) Submitted: December 29, 1998 Decided: January 19, 1999 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lamont Eugene Colbert, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Colbert v. Corcoran , No. CA-97-3846-H (D. Md. Mar. 24, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FOHP, INC.


                                   EXHIBIT 11
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE




                                                   Three Months Ended
                                                        March 31,
                                                   1996            1995
                                               ----------------------------


Net Income (Loss)                              (2,964,020)      (1,568,438)


Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding:
   For the three months ended March 31, 1996    2,100,173
   For the three months ended March 31, 1995                     1,571,853



Net (loss) per common share                    $    (1.41)   $       (1.00)
                                               ===========================


                                       16
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 311 

AN ACT 

To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

Agency to change the Spill Prevention, Control, and 

Countermeasure rule with respect to certain farms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 311 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farmers Undertake 

3 Environmental Land Stewardship Act’’ or the ‘‘FUELS 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, 

6 AND COUNTERMEASURE RULE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator, in imple8 menting the Spill Prevention, Control, and Counter9 measure rule with respect to any farm, shall— 

10 (1) require certification of compliance with such 

11 rule by— 

12 (A) a professional engineer for a farm 

13 with— 

14 (i) an individual tank with an above15 ground storage capacity greater than 

16 10,000 gallons; 

17 (ii) an aggregate aboveground storage 

18 capacity greater than or equal to 42,000 

19 gallons; or 

20 (iii) a history that includes a spill, as 

21 determined by the Administrator; or 

22 (B) the owner or operator of the farm (via 

23 self-certification) for a farm with— 

24 (i) an aggregate aboveground storage 

25 capacity greater than 10,000 gallons but 

26 less than 42,000 gallons; and 
3 

•HR 311 EH

1 (ii) no history of spills, as determined 

2 by the Administrator; and 

3 (2) exempt from all requirements of such rule 

4 any farm— 

5 (A) with an aggregate aboveground storage 

6 capacity of less than or equal to 10,000 gallons; 

7 and 

8 (B) no history of spills, as determined by 

9 the Administrator. 

10 (b) CALCULATION OF AGGREGATE ABOVEGROUND

11 STORAGE CAPACITY.—For the purposes of subsection (a), 

12 the aggregate aboveground storage capacity of a farm ex13 cludes all containers on separate parcels that have a ca14 pacity that is less than 1,320 gallons. 

15 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

16 In this Act, the following terms apply: 

17 (1) ADMINISTRATOR.—The term ‘‘Adminis18 trator’’ means the Administrator of the Environ19 mental Protection Agency. 

20 (2) FARM.—The term ‘‘farm’’ has the meaning 

21 given such term in section 112.2 of title 40, Code 

22 of Federal Regulations. 

23 (3) GALLON.—The term ‘‘gallon’’ refers to a 

24 United States liquid gallon. 
4 

•HR 311 EH

1 (4) SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND COUN2 TERMEASURE RULE.—The term ‘‘Spill Prevention, 

3 Control, and Countermeasure rule’’ means the regu4 lation promulgated by the Environmental Protection 

5 Agency under part 112 of title 40, Code of Federal 

6 Regulations. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 11, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 311 

AN ACT 

To direct the Administrator of the Environmental 

spect to certain farms. tion, Control, and Countermeasure rule with reProtection Agency to change the Spill Preven-
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Stanadyne Holdings, Inc. (Holdings) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), we, M. David Jones, President of
Holdings, and Stephen S. Langin, Chief Financial Officer of Holdings, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Holdings.



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ M. David Jones |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen S. Langin  
|M. David Jones     |  |  |  | Stephen S. Langin      
|President          |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|March 30, 2012     |  |  |  | March 30, 2012
#### SANDERS v. STATE.

No. 22484.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 14, 1943.

Jno. B. McNamara, of Waco, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with the theft of property of value more than fifty dollars. He entered a plea of guilty before a jury which found him guilty as “charged in the indictment,” and assessed his punishment at two years in the penitentiary.

Evidently by inadvertence he was adjudged to be guilty of “burglary,” and the sentence is likewise erroneous in that respect. Appellant was not charged with burglary at all.

The judgment will be reformed to show that appellant was adjudged to be guilty of the theft of property of more than the value of fifty dollars, and the sentence will be reformed to follow the corrected judgment. As thus reformed, the judgment is affirmed.
# Contents

Data 1

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngc1m.htm

U.S. Energy Information Administration

infoctr@eia.doe.gov

# Data 1

Back to Contents
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8Nos. 333-52814, 333-71228 and 333-101115) pertaining tothe 1995 Stock Plan (as amended) and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan ofCatalytica Energy Systems, Inc. of our report dated March 24, 2006,with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Catalytica EnergySystems, Inc., included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) forthe year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Phoenix, ArizonaMarch 24, 2006

----
(LOGO)
                                     OCWEN



March 30, 1998

Norwest Bank Minnesota, NA
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Securities Administration Services
Columbia, MD 21044

Attn: Corporate Trust Services
      Lehman Brothers, Series 1997-OFS3

RE: Officer Certification

I Jay B. Goldman as officer of Ocwen Federal Bank FSB (the "Bank")  confirm that
activities  required to be performed by the Bank under the  servicing  agreement
(the  "Agreement")  have been  completed  in  accordance  with the intent of the
respective Agreement, to the best of my knowledge.

Sincerely,
/s/Jay B. Goldman
Jay B. Goldman
Vice President Loan Servicing
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED 
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE 
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                       1
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-START>                                            	OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>	                                         SEP-30-1998	
<PERIOD-END>	                                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>	                                                      2,571,069
<SECURITIES>	                                               12,377,286
<RECEIVABLES>                                               	9,075,871
<ALLOWANCES>	                                                  153,861
<INVENTORY>                                                 	3,735,420
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           	28,219,922
<PP&E>                                                      	1,734,247
<DEPRECIATION>	                                                680,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             	35,607,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       	9,264,899
<BONDS>                                                             	0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               	0
<PREFERRED>                                                         	0
<COMMON>                                                      	177,406
<OTHER-SE>                                                 	26,165,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                35,607,903
<SALES>                                                    	14,823,275
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           	14,823,275
<CGS> 	                                                     13,425,976
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              	13,425,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>	                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    	0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         	  (324,274)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              	(359,294)
<INCOME-TAX>	                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          	(359,294)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             	(5,228,317)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     	0
<CHANGES>	                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                               	(5,587,611)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    	(.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    	(.35)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Dynabazaar, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James A.
Mitarotonda, the chief executive officer of Dynabazaar, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

      (i)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

       Date: April 2, 2007                  By: /s/ James A. Mitarotonda
                                                --------------------------------
                                                James A. Mitarotonda
                                                Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT  32.2
                                                                   -------------

                             CERTIFICATIONS  PURSUANT  TO
                  SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002
                            (18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350)

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Hyperdynamics  Corporation
(Hyperdynamics),  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, as filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Steven M. Plumb,
Chief  Financial  Officer of Hyperdynamics, does hereby certify, pursuant to 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.


Date:  February  21,  2006

                 (signed)
By:       /s/  Steven  M.  Plumb
          ----------------------
          Steven  M.  Plumb
          Chief  Financial  Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board ofDirectors 

iPass Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-107315, 333-118295, 333-130064, and 333-131879) on Form S-8 of iPass Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2010, with respect to the consolidatedbalance sheets of iPass Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-yearperiod ended December 31, 2009, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which report appears in the December 31, 2009 annual report onForm 10-K of iPass Inc. 

Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to changes in the accounting for taxuncertainties in 2007, resulting from the adoption of a new accounting pronouncement. 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California 

March 15, 2010
Exhibit 11.1


STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
AG-CHEM EQUIPMENT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


The per share computation are based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the periods.

                                  Three Months          Nine Months
                                  Ended June 30,       Ended June 30,
                               ------------------   ------------------
                                 1997       1996      1997       1996
                               -------    -------   -------    -------
Shares outstanding at            9,691      9,696     9,696      9,596
 beginning of period

Issuance of common stock          --         --        --          100

Repurchase and retirement of
common stock                       (21)      --         (26)      --
                               -------    -------   -------    -------

Shares outstanding at end of
period                           9,670      9,696     9,670      9,696
                               =======    =======   =======    =======

Weighted average shares
outstanding                      9,676      9,696     9,688      9,663
                               =======    =======   =======    =======

Net earnings                   $    36    $ 1,163   $ 9,317    $ 7,877
                               =======    =======   =======    =======

Earnings per common share      $  0.00    $  0.12   $  0.96    $  0.82
                               =======    =======   =======    =======