alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 3060 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 232 Southwest 

Johnson Avenue in Burleson, Texas, as the ‘‘Sergeant William Moody Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SERGEANT WILLIAM MOODY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 232 Southwest Johnson Avenue in Burleson, 

Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant William 

Moody Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sergeant William Moody Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# Appendix D1 Clovis 1 Field Data Sheets

## ( This page intentionally blank.)Page D1- 1Page D1- 2Page D1- 3Page D1-4Page D1- 5Page D1- 6Page D1- 7Page D1- 8 

## ( This page intentionally blank.)
Exhibit 23.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-44905) of ClimaChem, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated March27, 2002 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of ClimaChem, Inc. incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

 

 

								/s/Ernst & Young LLPERNST & YOUNG LLP

								Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

March 27, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Stanadyne Corporation (Stanadyne) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), we, M. David Jones, Chief Executive Officer of Stanadyne, and Stephen S. Langin, Chief Financial Officer of Stanadyne, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stanadyne.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ M. David Jones      |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen S. Langin  
|M. David Jones          |  |  |  | Stephen S. Langin      
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|June 21, 2010           |  |  |  | June 21, 2010
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Nasrat Hakim, certify that:



| | 1) | I have reviewed this amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March
31, 2015 of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Registrant”);
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: July 11, 2016 | /s/ Nasrat Hakim | 
|------------------- | ---------------- | 



| | Nasrat Hakim, Chief Executive Officer | 
| | ------------------------------------- |
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 210 (Monday, October 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64701-64702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Application Tendered for Filing With the Commission

October 24, 2000.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been 
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Major New License.
    b. Project No.: 309-036.
    c. Date filed: October 11, 2000.
    d. Applicant: Reliant Energy Mid-Atlantic Power Holdings, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Piney Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: Project is located on the Clarion River in Clarion 
County, Pennsylvania, and would not utilize any federal lands or 
facilities.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. Secs. 791(a)-
825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Thomas Teitt, Reliant Energy Mid-Atlantic 
Power Holdings, LLC, 1001 Broad St., Johnstown, PA 15907-1050.
    i. FERC Contact: Any questions on this notice should be addressed 
to William Guey-Lee, E-mail address <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1d6c8cdcdc8c0cc8fc6d4c4d8cdc4c4e1c7c4d3c28fc7c4c58fd4d2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bdcad4d1d1d4dcd093dac8d8c4d1d8d8fddbd8cfde93dbd8d993c8ce">[email protected]</span></a>, or 
telephone (202) 219-2808.
    j. Status of Environmental Review: This application is not ready 
for environmental analysis at this time.
    k. Description of Project: The project consists of the following: 
(1) The 427-foot-long and 139-foot-high concrete arch dam with crest 
elevation at 1,075 ft. msl, an 84-foot-long left non-overflow wall, and 
a 200-foot-long right non overflow wall; (2) an 800-acre surface area 
reservoir; (3) an 84-foot-wide integral intake; (4) three 230-foot-
long, 14-foot-diameter penstocks; (5) a powerhouse with 3 generating 
units totaling 28,300 kilowatts; (6) a 250-foot-long tailrace; (7) 700-
foot-long and 900-foot-long transmission lines; and (8) appurtenant 
facilities.
    l. Locations of the application: A copy of the application is 
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public 
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE, Room 2A, Washington, 
D.C. 20426, or by calling (202) 208-1371. The application may be viewed 
on the web at www.ferc.fed.us. Call (202) 208-2222 for assistance. A 
copy is also available

[[Page 64702]]

for inspection and reproduction at the address in item h above.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27764 Filed 10-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel Aging Oxidative Stress and Cell Death.                    

*Date:*                         November 8, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         6:00 PM to 11:00 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Courtyard by Marriott Medical Center, 8585 Marriott, San Antonio, TX 78229.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ramesh Vemuri, PhD, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute on Aging, The Bethesda Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C12, Bethesda, MD 20892, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9666.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 24, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-28119  Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### City of Cincinnati, Appellee, *v.*Board of Education of City School Dist. of City of Cincinnati, Appellant.

(No. 28403

Decided January 22, 1941.)

*Mr. John B. Ellis,*city solicitor, and *Mr. Nathan Solinger,*for appellee.

*Mr. Bert H. Long*and *Mr. Milton M. Bloom,*for appellant.

It is ordered.and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23









CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
--------------------------------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-42859 of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch Preferred Capital Trust
III and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P. on Form S-3 of our reports
dated March 24, 2006, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merrill
Lynch Preferred Capital Trust III and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.
for the year ended December 30, 2005.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


New York, New York
March 24, 2006
exv4w4



 






Exhibit 4.4




Summary of Employment Arrangements




between Bayer Aktiengesellschaft




and Werner Wenning




Term: W. Wenning was appointed Chairman of the Board of Management of the Company by the
Supervisory Board effective April 27, 2002. The term will expire on January 31, 2007.


Compensation: The aggregate remuneration of W. Wenning for 2005 is comprised of the
following elements:



Base  salary: EUR 748,872. W. Wenning also received remuneration in kind and other payments
totaling EUR 40,169 and consisting mainly of amounts such as the value assigned for taxation
purposes to the use of a company car.



Fixed supplement: EUR 325,132



Variable bonus: EUR 1,554,615 (determined by attainment of the group gross EBITDA target)



Stock-based compensation: The current entitlement for 2005 — along with compensation
arising from previous years’ programs, parts of which are not yet earned was EUR 495,504.




     Retirement: W. Wenning is entitled to receive pension up from the age of 60. The
yearly pension entitlement is based on at least 30% of the sum of the last yearly base salary and
fixed supplement. This percentage increases over time depending on years of service as a Board
member and determines the final target pension level which is capped at 80%. Upon expiration of the
current term the level of 80% will be reached. These amounts are in addition to any amounts
received as a result of his participation in Bayer’s Employee Pension Plan (See Item 6).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20- 0 331 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KYLE JORDAN MILLHOUSE ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 13, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 7 2020

12/07/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0331
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   OCT-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,585,695
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,154,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10,000
<INVENTORY>                                     19,960,310
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,167,917
<PP&E>                                          16,255,310
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,042,199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,824,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,137,212
<BONDS>                                          6,840,421
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        15,038,965
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,659,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,824,606
<SALES>                                         17,615,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,615,774
<CGS>                                            8,277,176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,741,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 356,444
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,398,897
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,121,130
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,277,767
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,277,767
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.67


</TABLE>
Amendment to Olin Senior Executive Pension Plan effective  May 27, 2005



 Exhibit 10(c)(1) 
 BENEFIT PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF OLIN CORPORATION 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 OLIN SENIOR EXECUTIVE PENSION PLAN 
 (As
amended and restated effective July 27, 2000) 
 Olin Corporation (the “Company”) currently maintains the Olin Senior
Executive Pension Plan (the “Plan”). In Section 7.1 of the Plan, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan. Pursuant to the authority granted to the Benefit Plan Review Committee of Olin Corporation (“the Committee”),
the Committee hereby amends the Plan in the following manner: 
 Article IV of the Plan is amended by adding the following Section 4.8:

 “4.8. Effective May 27, 2005, the Plan is amended to add a Participation Termination Provision, provided that
such provision shall be subject to the following requirements: (i) the Company, in its sole discretion, consents to each election, (ii) the Company determines the form and terms of any termination election (which form and terms may vary
among participants), (iii) in accordance with the 409A Guidance, the Participant shall receive his accrued but unpaid Plan benefit as soon as administratively feasible following such termination, provided that such payment(s) will be made on or
before December 31, 2005, or if later, the taxable year in which the amount is earned and vested, and (iv) only participants who terminate employment with the Company on or before December 31, 2005 are eligible to elect to terminate
their Plan participation (subject to the Company consent contained in item (i)). 
 “Participation Termination
Provision” shall mean an election to terminate participation in the Plan upon a Participant’s termination of employment on or before December 31, 2005, consistent with applicable Internal Revenue Service guidance for Code
Section 409A, including without limitation, IRS Notice 2005-1, as amended (referred to herein as the “409A Guidance”). 
 Effective as of May 27, 2005, this Section 4.8 is further amended so that no Participant other than Anthony W. Ruggiero may make a termination election under this Section 4.8.”
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 214 (Friday, November 3, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 66169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28293]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 2000-ASW-15]


Revision of Class E Airspace, Tulsa, OK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
which revises the Class E Airspace at Tulsa, OK.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct final rule published at 65 FR 54952 is 
effective 0901 UTC, November 30, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air 
Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, 
Fort Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 817-222-5593.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on September 12, 
2000, (65 FR 54952). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure 
for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be 
no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public 
that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written 
adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an 
adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the 
regulation would become effective on November 30, 2000. No adverse 
comments were received, and, thus, this action confirms that this 
direct final rule will be effective on that date.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on October 27, 2000.
Robert N. Stevens,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 00-28293 Filed 11-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

RAYMOND E. STAUFFER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BROOKS BROTHERS, INC. AND RETAIL BRAND 

ALLIANCE, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND

UNITED STATES,

Intervenor-Appellee.

______________________ 

2013-1180

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of New York in No. 08-CV-10369, Judge 

Sidney H. Stein.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

 Raymond E. Stauffer moves without opposition for an 

extension of time to file his reply brief.

Case: 13-1180 Document: 59 Page: 1 Filed: 12/17/2013
2 STAUFFER v. BROOKS BROTHERS, INC. 

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. Stauffer's reply brief, if it has 

not already been filed, is due within 14 days of the date of 

this order. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s27

Case: 13-1180 Document: 59 Page: 2 Filed: 12/17/2013
#### ANDERSON v. STATE.

No. 24715.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 15, 1950.

B. F. Word, Meridian, C. O. McMillan, Stephenville, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for driving a motor vehicle on State Highway No. 6 while intoxicated, with a fine of $50.

The only question raised by the appellant is the sufficiency of the evidence. It is not shown that the driving was on State Highway No.-6, as alleged.

Under the authority of Tate v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 223 S.W.2d 634, and many cases over a period of years, the State’s Attorney confesses error.' It was .not necessary to allege the number and name of the highway but since it is alleged it should be proven as alleged.

We approve the position .taken by the State’s Attorney and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the same for a new trial.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7575

ERIC DEWITT DUNSEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

FRANK C. SIZER, JR., Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA98-3011-PJM)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Dewitt Dunsen, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Eric Dunsen seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Dunsen v. Sizer, No. CA-98-3011-PJM (D. Md.

Sept. 18, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED