alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 215 (Monday, November 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28331]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-958-1430-ET, HAG01-0026; OR-52315]


Notice of Proposed Withdrawal Correction, Oregon

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice corrects an error in the legal description in the 
notice of proposed withdrawal published in 65 FR 59464, dated October 
5, 2000, FR Doc. 00-25555. The land described as the E\1/2\NE\1/4\ of 
sec. 12, T. 31 S., R. 1 E., Willamette Meridian, should read, W\1/
2\NE\1/4\ of sec. 12, T. 31 S., R. 1 E., Willamette Meridian.

    Dated: October 27, 2000.
Sherrie L. Reid,
Acting Chief, Branch Realty and Records Services.
[FR Doc. 00-28331 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       8,543,721
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,970,820
<ALLOWANCES>                                   535,347
<INVENTORY>                                 11,781,713
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,884,736
<PP&E>                                      12,747,315
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,628,515
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,296,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,625,629
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,166,685
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,296,457
<SALES>                                     38,261,940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,261,940
<CGS>                                       32,802,641
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,802,641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,567,735
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             146,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,058,990
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,040,057
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,040,057
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,018,933
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3248 

Making continuing appropriations for all departments and agencies of the 

Federal Government, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 5, 2013 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

Making continuing appropriations for all departments and 

agencies of the Federal Government, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal Sanity Act for 

5 Appropriations’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS. 

7 There is hereby appropriated for 60 days after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act— 

9 (1) for each project or activity for which budget 

10 authority was provided in the Consolidated and FurVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:20 Oct 06, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3248.IH H3248

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3248 IH

1 ther Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (Public 

2 Law 113–6), an amount equal to the budget author3 ity provided in such Act, as reduced pursuant to the 

4 Presidential sequestration order dated March 1, 

5 2013, to remain available for a comparable period of 

6 availability; and 

7 (2) for entitlements and other mandatory pay8 ments whose budget authority was provided in ap9 propriations Acts for fiscal year 2013, and for activi10 ties under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, such 

11 amounts as may be necessary to maintain program 

12 levels as they existed on September 30, 2013. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.1
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, Ford Sinclair, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Global Golf Holdings, Inc. 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
 4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: September 6, 2004   /s/ Ford Sinclair _______________________
 Ford Sinclair, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 7  GRUMA, S.A. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges (Thousands of pesos of purchasing power as of December 31,2004)  Mexican
  GAAP
  Year ended December 31,
  
  US GAAP
  Year ended December 31,2000
  
  2001
  
  2002
  
  2003
  
  2004
  
  2000
  
  2001
  
  2002
  
  2003
  
  2004Income
  before income tax and other items
  
  428,118
  
  816,318
  
  1,093,515
  
  1,125,552
  
  1,586,245
  
  211,295
  
  808,983
  
  983,416
  
  1,373,551
  
  1,394,646Add:Interest
  expense
  
  912,568
  
  731,551
  
  618,612
  
  538,077
  
  486,716
  
  968,866
  
  746,920
  
  637,318
  
  577,355
  
  501,557One-third
  of operating rental expense
  
  158,875
  
  137,312
  
  133,444
  
  123,853
  
  136,331
  
  163,092
  
  134,060
  
  130,765
  
  123,698
  
  134,239Earnings
  (b)
  
  1,499,561
  
  1,685,181
  
  1,845,571
  
  1,787,482
  
  2,209,292
  
  1,343,253
  
  1,689,963
  
  1,751,499
  
  2,074,604
  
  2,030,442Fixed
  chargesInterest
  expense
  
  912,568
  
  731,551
  
  618,612
  
  538,077
  
  486,716
  
  968,866
  
  746,920
  
  637,318
  
  577,355
  
  501,557Capitalized
  interest
  
  6,680
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  6,982
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  One-third
  of operating rental expense
  
  158,875
  
  137,312
  
  133,444
  
  123,853
  
  136,331
  
  163,092
  
  134,060
  
  130,765
  
  123,698
  
  134,239Total
  Fixed charges (a)
  
  1,078,123
  
  868,863
  
  752,056
  
  661,930
  
  623,047
  
  1,138,940
  
  880,980
  
  768,083
  
  701,053
  
  635,796Ratio of
  earnings to fixed charges (b)/(a)
  
  1.39
  
  1.94
  
  2.45
  
  2.70
  
  3.55
  
  1.18
  
  1.92
  
  2.28
  
  2.96
  
  3.19
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350     I, James Pritchett, President and Chief Executive Officer of Sielox, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 31, 2009 /s/ James PritchettJames PritchettPresident and Chief Executive Officer
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 122

Concerning the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 15, 1993

Mrs. MALONEY (for herself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr.

MEEHAN, Mr. MANTON, Mr. GILMAN, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. RAVENEL, Ms.

SNOWE, Mr. HUGHES, Mr. BATEMAN, Mr. FAZIO, Mr. SHAYS, Mr.

MCNULTY, Mr. STUDDS, and Mr. DELLUMS) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign

Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

Whereas negotiations under the auspices of the United Nations are currently being conducted pertaining to the

name and to other national symbols of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia;

Whereas all historical and archaeological evidence demonstrates that the ancient Macedonians were Greeks and

Macedonia is a Greek name in origin;

Whereas in 1944 the name of the territory of the Former

Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia was changed from

Vardar Banovina to Macedonia as part of the campaign

by Yugoslavia’s Communist dictator Tito to gain control

of the Greek province of Macedonia and the United
2

•HCON 122 IH

States opposed the use of the name Macedonia by Tito

at that time;

Whereas Greece was a valuable ally of the United States during World War II and during the cold war;

Whereas Greece continues to be a valuable ally of the United

States in the Eastern Mediterranean as demonstrated by

its coalition role in the Persian Gulf conflict;

Whereas Greece has no claim on the territory of the Former

Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and has repeatedly

reaffirmed the inviolability of all borders in the area of

the two countries; and

Whereas it is in the interest of the United States to oppose

any expansionist or irredentist policies in order to promote peace and stability in such area: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 United States should use its influence as a permanent

4 member of the United Nations Security Council to support

5 the efforts of Greece, in its negotiations with the Former

6 Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, to find a solution which

7 promotes a solid, cooperative relationship between these

8 two neighboring countries.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 65851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28126]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL00-118-000]


Public Service Company of New Mexico; Notice Amending Docket No. 
Assignment

October 27, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 7, 2000, as amended on September 8, 2000, 
the Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) tendered for filing an 
application under section 203 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), seeking 
Commission authorization for PNM's corporate restructuring to implement 
retail competition in New Mexico. PNM's application and its amendment 
were assigned Docket Nos. EC00-99-000 and EC00-99-001, and were noticed 
under those docket numbers, with comments due on or before July 7, 2000 
and September 29, 2000, respectively.
    Also in its original application, PNM requested Commission 
authorization for waivers of the requirements of Order Nos. 888, 889 
and 2000 with respect to Manzano Energy Corporation's future functions, 
and a disclaimer of jurisdiction over transactions within the meaning 
of section 305(a) of the FPA. That portion of PNM's application should 
have been assigned an ``EL'' docket number. Accordingly, this notice is 
to amend the original Docket No. assignments EC00-99-000 and EC00-99-
001 to include the assignment of Docket No. EL00-118-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest Docket No. EL00-118-
000 should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such 
motions and protests should be filed on or before November 9, 2000. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may 
also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Beginning November 1, 
2000, comments and protests may be filed electronically via the 
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28126 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Stanadyne Corporation (Stanadyne) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), we, M. David Jones, Chief Executive
Officer of Stanadyne, and Stephen S. Langin, Chief Financial Officer of Stanadyne, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Stanadyne.



|                                      |  |  |  |                                           
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|/s/ M. David Jones                    |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen S. Langin                     
|M. David Jones                        |  |  |  | Stephen S. Langin                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|March 30, 2012                        |  |  |  | March 30, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4
OF THE COMPANYS FORM 10Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         145,622
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  268,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               284,847
<PP&E>                                      15,212,742
<DEPRECIATION>                             (7,639,330)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,272,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,616,599
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,655,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,272,013
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,503,077
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,113,317
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             227,150
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                162,610
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            162,610
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   162,610
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6**  **652**

RYRICKA NIKITA CUSTIS , P etitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director , Respondent

- Appellee
. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Mark S. Davis , District Judge. ( 2 :1 3

- cv - 0 0302

- MSD

- TEM )

Submitted : July 29, 2014 Decided: August 1, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

. Ryricka Nikita Custis , Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Hyman Katz, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ryricka Nikita Custis seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Custis’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by d emonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitut ional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Custis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We further deny Custis’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument3 because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### McELROY v. STATE.

No. 24369.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 23, 1949.

Chas. Nordyke, Stephenville, for appellant.

G. H. Williamson, Stephenville, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The opinion heretofore rendered in this cause, of date October 26, 1949, is withdrawn, and the following substituted in lieu thereof:

The information described the automobile which appellant was alleged to have driven while intoxicated as a “1939 Model Ford, License # Texas BT 3028.” We have been unable to find that the State supported this allegation by proof. The State was not under the burden of describing the automobile in such detail in order to charge the offense of driving an automobile while intoxicated but, having done so, was required to establish that allegation by the proof, as such detailing became descriptive of the motor vehicle which the State charged appellant was driving. Brunson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 211 S.W.2d 755; Spencer v. State, 118 Tex.Cr.R. 336, 42 S.W.2d 259; Vaught v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 623, 171 S.W.2d 128, and authorities there cited.

The appellant did not call attention, either originally or on motion for rehearing, to this variance. The failure to make the required proof is fundamental error and requires a reversal of the case.

The judgment of the trial court is now reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Case 3:22-cv-00439-S-BH   Document 53   Filed 09/26/23    Page 1 of 1   PageID 631