alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 215 (Monday, November 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28378]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL01-11-00]


Lester C. Reed, Complainant, v. Georgia Power Company, 
Respondent; Notice of Complaint

October 31, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 27, 2000, pursuant to Rule 206 of the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC or Commission) Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206, Lester C. Reed filed a 
complaint regarding certain actions and inactions by the Georgia Power 
Corporation in the operation of the Sinclair Dam (Project No. 1951) 
that are alleged to be in violation of its operating license. These 
actions and inactions allegedly damaged Mr. Reed and numerous citizens 
of the United States by reducing their enjoyment of the Project and 
reducing home values. Mr. Reed is requesting that the Commission 
enforce the provisions of the license agreement, institute procedures 
to prevent re-occurrence of the non-compliance, order payment of 
damages to the citizens and communities who were damaged by Georgia 
Power's alleged negligence in failing to follow the provisions of the 
license agreement and apply sanctions, monetary and non-monetary, to 
Georgia Power for failure to follow the operating license.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed on or before November 16, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for assistance. Answers to the 
complaint shall also be due on or before November 16, 2000. Beginning 
November 1, 2000, comments and protests may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/dorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28378 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65292-65293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28038]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Southwest Washington Provincial Advisory Committee Meeting Notice

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Southwest Washington Provincial Advisory Committee will 
meet on Wednesday, November 15, 2000, at the Gifford Pinchot National 
Forest Office, located at 10600 NE 51st Circle, Vancouver, Washington. 
The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until 4:15 p.m. The 
purpose of the meeting is to: (1) Review the National Roads Policy; (2) 
Discuss the mission of the committee, and (3) Provide for a Public Open 
Forum. All Southwest Washington Provincial Advisory Committee meetings 
are open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend. 
The ``open forum'' provides opportunity for the public to bring issues, 
concerns, and discussion

[[Page 65293]]

topics to the Advisory Committee. The ``open forum'' is scheduled as 
part of agenda item (3) for this meeting. Interested speakers will need 
to register prior to the open forum period. The committee welcomes the 
public's written comments on committee business at any time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Linda Turner, Public Affairs Specialist, at (360) 891-5195, 
or write Forest Headquarters Office, Gifford Pinchot National Forest, 
10600 NE. 51st Circle, Vancouver, WA 98682.

    Dated: October 26, 2000.
Claire Lavendel,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 00-28038 Filed 10-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  (unaudited)  statements of income for the three months ended March
31, 2000 and the  consolidated  balance sheet as of March 31, 2000  contained in
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10 Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>


<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                   20,599,692
<SECURITIES>                                 85,340
<RECEIVABLES>                            31,469,598
<ALLOWANCES>                             (3,389,836)
<INVENTORY>                                  91,766
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         62,226,924
<PP&E>                                   26,875,117
<DEPRECIATION>                          (12,446,851)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           97,143,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    25,187,774
<BONDS>                                     139,631
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                    204,770
<OTHER-SE>                               71,610,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             97,143,014
<SALES>                                   7,552,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         25,250,944
<CGS>                                       462,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            11,031,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         19,465,643
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              5,617
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           31,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (5,115,712)
<INCOME-TAX>                             (2,047,934)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (3,067,778)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                             (3,067,778)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.16)



</TABLE>
#### WADE v. STATE.

No. 22940.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 22, 1944.

B. F. Whitworth, of Houston, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS,'Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted for possessing whiskey in a container to which no tax stamp was affixed, showing that the tax due the State had been paid, and her punishment was assessed at a fine of $200.

The facts are unusually short. The Sheriff of Cass County was the only witness. Appellant was a negro woman who lived with her husband. The sheriff went to their home. The husband was not there at the time. Appellant invited the sheriff into the house. He went in and asked appellant if she had any whiskey there. She replied in the negative. He then asked her if she objected to him looking around, and she told him, “No, sir, help yourself.” He found four pints and four half pints of whiskey, none of which bore the stamp tax. This is all the evidence. It does not appear where in the house the liquor was found; whether it was apparently hidden or was in the open.

Appellant brings forward bills of exception complaining that the officer had no search warrant. This passes out of the case by reason of her consent to the search. The officer did not represent that he had a warrant, and in no way overreached or intimidated appellant into giving consent to the search. 38 Tex.Jur. p. 77, § 53; Davidson v. State, 126 Tex.Cr. R. 572, 72 S.W.2d 591; Hernandez v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 343, 129 S.W.2d 301; Dixon v. State, 108 Tex.Cr.R. 650, 2 S.W.2d 272.

It is appellant’s contention that in the absence of evidence showing that the wife exercised any control or management of the whiskey in question, but only showed it to have been in the house occupied by her and her husband, the evidence falls short of supporting the conviction. He relies on Watson v. State, 114 Tex.Cr.R. 117, 24 S.W.2d 830; Smith v. State, 90 Tex. Cr.R. 273, 234 S.W. 893; Gonzales v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R. 48, 156 S.W.2d 988. As bearing on appellant’s contention we note *577Peters v. State, 142 Tex.Cr.R. 146, 151 S.W.2d 592.

The authorities referred to sustain our conclusion that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Take notice that on January 28, 2000, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet, with an effective date of March 1, 2000.

#### Second Revised Sheet No. 45E.1

ANR states that the purpose of the filing is to designate one additional point as being eligible for service under its existing Rate Schedule IPLS.

ANR states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all affected customers and state regulatory commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call (202) 208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-2790 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission of Fine Arts

The next meeting of the Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for 16 November 2000 at 10 a.m., in the Commission's offices at the National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 441 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion affecting the appearance of Washington, D.C., may include buildings, parks and memorials.

Draft agendas are available to the public one week prior to the meeting. Inquiries regarding the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be addressed to Charles H. Atherton, Secretary, Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address or call 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.

Dated in Washington, DC, 30 October 2000.

Charles H. Atherton,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-28169  Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                              HELLO DIRECT, INC.

                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                                                        Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended
                                                                        ------------------      -----------------
                                                                           September 30,         September 30,
                                                                           -------------         -------------
                                                                        1996         1995       1996         1995
                                                                        ----         ----       ----         ----
<S>                                                                  <C>         <C>         <C>          <C> 
Income before extraordinary item                                    $  145,000  $  831,000   $  705,000    $ 2,342,000
                                                                    ----------  ----------   ----------    -----------

Net income                                                          $  145,000  $  831,000   $  705,000    $ 2,205,000
                                                                    ----------  ----------   ----------    -----------

Weighted average common shares outstanding                           4,986,000   4,940,000    4,976,000      4,199,000
Common stock equivalents:
    Common stock options, utilizing treasury stock method
     when dilutive                                                      57,000     154,000       57,000        162,000
                                                                    ----------  ----------   ----------    -----------

Weighted average shares outstanding                                  5,043,000   5,094,000    5,033,000      4,361,000
                                                                    ==========  ==========   ==========     ==========

Per share amounts
    
    Income before extraordinary                                     $     0.03  $     0.16   $     0.14     $     0.54 
                                                                    ==========  ==========   ==========     ==========
    Net income                                                      $     0.03  $     0.16   $     0.14     $     0.51
                                                                    ==========  ==========   ==========     ==========

</TABLE>
<TABLE>
                      LIBERTY FINANCIAL COMPANIES, INC.

               EXHIBIT 12 - Statement re Computation of Ratios
                               ($ in millions)

<CAPTION>
                                    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended
                                       September 30           September 30
                                   --------------------  --------------------
                                    1997        1996       1997        1996
                                   ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------

<S>                                   <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>   
Earnings:

 Pretax income                        $47.8      $36.4     $143.5     $106.7
 Add fixed charges:
  Interest on indebtedness              5.3        5.7       16.2       17.2
 Portion of rent representing
  the interest factor                   1.0        1.1        3.1        3.2
 Preferred stock dividends              0.2        0.2        0.7        0.7
 Accretion to face value
  of redeemable convertable
  preferred stock                       0.2        0.2        0.6        0.6
                                   ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
   Income as adjusted                 $54.5      $43.6     $164.1     $128.4
                                   =========  =========  =========  =========
Fixed charges:

 Interest on indebtedness              $5.3      $ 5.7      $16.2     $ 17.2
 Portion of rent representing
   the interest factor                  1.0        1.1        3.1        3.2
 Preferred stock dividends              0.2        0.2        0.7        0.7
 Accretion to face value of
  redeemable convertible 
  preferred stock                       0.2        0.2        0.6        0.6
                                   ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
     Total fixed charges               $6.7      $ 7.2      $20.6     $ 21.7
                                   =========  =========  =========  =========

  Ratio of earnings to fixed   
   charges                             8.13x      6.06x      7.97x      5.92x
                                   =========  =========  =========  =========
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY MAURICE BALDWIN, Estate

of the foregoing, by and through the

Administratrix, Jo Ann Baldwin,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

No. 97-1104

T. P. RILEY, individually and in his

official capacity as an officer of the

Fayetteville City Police Department;

THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CA-96-192-5-F)

Argued: January 29, 1998

Decided: March 23, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

ARGUED: Clifford Leon Lee, II, THE LEE LAW FIRM, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Bobby Grey Deaver, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Carl James Milazzo, OFFICE OF THE CITY

ATTORNEY, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The estate of Anthony M. Baldwin sued T.P. Riley, a police officer, and his employer, the City of Fayetteville, North Carolina, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming the unreasonable use of force in the

killing of Anthony Baldwin. The killing occurred at the end of a highspeed motor vehicle chase, which commenced after Baldwin fired on

a police officer following an apparent attempted bank robbery. As one

of the pursuing officers, Riley chased Baldwin at speeds in excess of

100 miles per hour, during which time Baldwin gravely endangered

the lives of other motorists and repeatedly fired his shotgun at Riley.

In a final effort to escape, Baldwin pulled his car into a church

parking lot and emerged, shotgun in hand, to face Riley. As Riley

brought his vehicle to a stop, Baldwin pointed his shotgun at Riley

and moved toward Riley's vehicle. When Riley saw Baldwin turn to

flee, he exited his vehicle and ordered Baldwin to"freeze." Baldwin

refused, and continued his flight toward a nearby residential area.

Unable to see both of Baldwin's hands, Riley reasonably believed

Baldwin was still carrying his shotgun. Fearing that Baldwin posed

an immediate danger to himself and the general public, Riley fired

three times, striking Baldwin once in the head, killing him instantly.

We hold that the actions of Riley and his employer, the City of

Fayetteville, were not unreasonable under the circumstances. The district judge so found, and we agree for the reasons stated in his opinion. See Baldwin v. Riley, No. 5:96-CV-192-F3 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 19,

1996).

That opinion is accordingly

AFFIRMED.

 2
CHARTER FLEET 

INTERNATIONAL 

^u^^RTMENTOF 

"'ANSPORWION 

:;;'ET OPERMIONS 

28 December 2010 ^01! JAN ! 0 P l:3 i 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Management System, 

400 7th Street, SW., Room PL 401, 

Washington, DC 20591-0001 

RE: Request for Exemption from 135.337(f), 135.338(f) 

Charter Fleet International, LLC (CFI) is requesting exemption from 135.337(f) and 135.338(f) for an 

indefinite period of time. In making this request CFI only uses Check Airman (simulator) from our 

approved Part 142 training providers and our current selected and approved training provider has a 

current deviation authority allowing CAE SimuFlite, Inc. simulator flight instructors to satisfy the 

requirements of that section by satisfactorily completing an approved Line Operational Simulation 

(LOS) each 12 calendar months. A copy of their approved Deviations regarding this matter is attached 

to this request. 

Additionally conditions required under this request for deviation, including instructor eligibility and 

LOS minimimi standards are specified in the documented Line-Performance/Line-Observation Course 

for Part 142 Flight Instructors, Air Carrier Confract Flight Instructors (Simulator and Air Carrier 

Confract Check Pilots (Simulator) located at www.faa.gov/pilots/training/part 142. These additional 

conditions are an integral part of the deviation granted CAE, and must be adhered to. To this point, this 

letter explains an equal level of safety by using this exemption for those provisions in our approved 

training program that shows our training provider has trained and audited all of TCE's and fraining 

center approved Instructors by an alternate means:i.e. a simulator L.O.S. training and checking session 

program. 

To this end, it serves no purpose and is not in the public interest to publish this exemption on the 

Federal and we request an approved deviation. 

Sincerely, 

J Rob Irwin 

Manager/member 

CFI, LLC 

10122 AIRPORT COURT BROOMFIELD, COLORADO 80021