alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 65881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28180]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--The Asymmetrical Digital Subscriber Line Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 7, 1999, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``Act''), The Asymmetrical Digital Subscriber 
Line Forum (``ADSL'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the 
purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Catena Technologies, Kanata, Ontario, Canada; Earthlink, 
Pasadena, CA; East by North, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; Netopia, 
Alameda, CA; Secre Composants S.A., Pontault, Comboerl, France; WCI 
Cable, Dover, DE; and Telecordia Technologies, Morristown, NJ have been 
added as parties to this venture. Also, Accelerated Networks, Inc., 
Westlake Village, CA; Advanced Hardware Architectures, Pullman, WA; 
Amphenol Canada Corp., Scarborough, Ontario, Canada; Applied 
Innovation, Dublin, OH; Ascend Communications, Westford, MA; Bellcore, 
Morristown, NJ; Cirrus Logic, Fremont, CA; Communications Technology, 
Inc., Cranbery, NJ; Escalate Networks, Irvine, CA; Flowpoint Corp., Los 
Gatos, CA; General Signal Networks, Westford, MA; GenRad, Inc., 
Westford, MA; Globaloop, Ltd., Kfar Sava, Israel; Global Village 
Communication, Sunnyvale, CA; Iterated Systems, Atlanta, GA; KTL, 
Arnhem, The Netherlands; Madge Networks, Wexham, England, United 
Kingdom; Milgo Solutions, Inc., Sunrise, FL; Robertson, Stephens & Co., 
San Francisco, CA; Shasta Networks, Menlo Park, CA; Telia AB, 
Stockholm, Sweden; Torrent Networking Technologies, Silver Spring, MD; 
Tut Systems, Inc., Pleasant Hill, CA; and Web Silicon, Los Gatos, CA 
have been dropped as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and ADSL intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 15, 1995, ADSL filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 25, 
1995 (60 FR 338058).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 23, 
1999. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on June 1, 1999 (64 FR 29356).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-28180 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Family, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2022-Ohio-2507.]

COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. FAMILY.

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Family, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2022-Ohio-2507.]

(No. 2021-0978—Submitted July 21, 2022—Decided July 22, 2022.)

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.

____________________

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 

application for reinstatement by respondent, Christian Manning Family, Attorney 

Registration No. 0074728, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 17, 2021, 

wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from 

the practice of law for a period of 18 months, with the final 12 months stayed on 

the conditions, finds that respondent has complied with that order and with the 

provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 

the practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that in accordance with 

Gov.Bar R. V(21) and consistent with the opinion rendered herein on November 

17, 2021, respondent shall serve a two-year period of monitored probation.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that on or before 30 days from the date of this 

order relator shall file with the clerk of this court the name of the attorney who will 

serve as respondent’s monitor, in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(21)(A)(3). It is 

further ordered that at the end of respondent’s probationary period, relator shall file 

with the clerk of this court a report indicating whether respondent, during the 

probationary period, complied with the terms of the probation.

{¶ 5} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period 

respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R. 

V(21). It is further ordered that respondent’s probation shall not be terminated until 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2

(1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in compliance with 

Gov.Bar R. V(21)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all other orders issued 

by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the Government of the Bar 

of Ohio, (4) relator files with the clerk of this court a report indicating that 

respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, and (5) this court orders 

that the probation be terminated.

{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be 

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).

{¶ 7} For earlier case, see Columbus Bar Assn. v. Family, 167 Ohio St.3d 

32, 2021-Ohio-4054, 188 N.E.3d 1042.

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART,

and BRUNNER, JJ., concur.

_________________
#### LEWIS v. STATE.

No. 24953.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 8, 1950.

No attorney, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for an assault with intent to commit murder without malice. The penalty assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for one year.

The record is before this court without bills of exception or statement of facts. The indictment and all other matters of procedure appear to be in regular form.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5 
<LEGEND>  
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated   balance   sheet,   consolidated   statement  of  operations   and
consolidated statement of cash flows included in the Company's Form 10-Q for the
period ended  September 26, 1997,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER>               1,000
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-26-1997
<CASH>                                       29,293
<SECURITIES>                                 54,502
<RECEIVABLES>                                 6,869
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                   8,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            108,458
<PP&E>                                       10,141
<DEPRECIATION>                                3,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              115,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        14,639
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        254
<OTHER-SE>                                  100,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                115,022
<SALES>                                      19,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             19,285
<CGS>                                         7,218
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                15,749
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               4,249
<INCOME-TAX>                                  1,572
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           2,677
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  2,677
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.10
                                                 

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Apollo Gold Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/R. David
      RussellR.
      David RussellPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerMay
      10, 2010/s/Melvyn
      WilliamsMelvyn
      WilliamsChief
      Financial Officer and Senior VicePresident-Finance
      and Corporate DevelopmentMay
      10, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being filed
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
Order entered April 15, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00243-CV

IN RE JOHN EDWARD HINES, JR., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 15th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 046853

ORDER

Before Justices Whitehill, Partida-Kipness, and Pedersen, III

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we CONDITIONALLY GRANT relator’s 

petition for writ of mandamus. We ORDER the trial court to issue a written ruling on relator’s 

motion for judgment nunc pro tunc within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. We further 

ORDER the trial court to file with this Court, within the time for compliance with the Court’s 

opinion and order of this date, a certified copy of its order evidencing such compliance. Should 

the trial court fail to comply with this order, the writ will issue. 

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51208 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. VICTOR MANUEL MATA-BARRERA Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:07-CR-309-1 Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing theJudgment in a Criminal Case, Victor Manuel Mata-Barrera raises arguments that are foreclosed by Al mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), whic h held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 2008 WL 59441 (Jan. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D January 30, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-51208

2 7, 2008) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 In connection with the Annual Report of iPass Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Donald C. McCauley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 15, 2005
    /s/ Donald C. McCauleyDonald C. McCauley
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
iPass Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998             APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998             JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,336,276                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,135,584                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,741,182                       0
<PP&E>                                      43,661,612                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                             (13,756,223)                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,437,149                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,727,443                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     3,730,111                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,437,149                       0
<SALES>                                      2,401,559               1,180,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,401,559                  42,228
<CGS>                                        1,388,789                 886,348
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,587,202               1,943,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (70,407)                (63,599)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             750,578                 928,554
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (865,814)             (1,585,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (865,814)             (1,585,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (865,814)             (1,585,324)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.03)                  (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)                  (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6503

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DESHAWN EDWARD DERR , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. James C. Cacheris , Senior District Judge. ( 1:11

- cr - 00517

- JCC

- 1; 1:16

- cv 00663

- JCC )

Submitted : August 12, 2019 Decided: August 19, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge , THACKER, Circuit Judge , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Deshawn Edward Derr, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Taylor Young, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STA TES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Deshawn Edward Derr seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Sla ck v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Derr has not made the requisite showing. In his § 2255 motion, Derr claimed his 18 U.S. C. § 924(c) (2012) conviction was obtained in violation of Johnson v. United States , 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). The predicate offense for his § 924(c) conviction was Hobbs Act robbery committed on or about June 17, 2011. In light of United States v. Mathis , No. 16

- 4633, __ F.3d __, 2019 WL 3437626, at *16 (4th Cir. July 31, 2019) (holding that “Hobbs Act robbery constitutes a crime of violence under the force clause of Section 924(c)”), we conclude that Derr fails to show his § 2255 motion states a va lid claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion to appoint counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with3 oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.17(a)

                            FOURTH ADDENDUM TO LEASE

This agreement shall serve as the fourth Addendum to the Lease dated August 7,
1997, by and between Highland Industrial Properties L.L.C., (Lessor) and Genomic
Solutions, Inc., formerly know as B.I. Systems Corp. (Lessee), for office and
warehouse space located at 4355 Varsity Drive Suite "F" and 4401 Varsity Drive
Suite "F," Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Lessor and Lessee hereby agree to this Fourth Addendum to Lease on the following
terms and conditions:

1.   Lessor agrees to Lease to Lessee and Lessee agrees to Lease from Lessor an
     additional 6,689 square feet of office and warehouse space at 4401 Varsity
     Drive, Suite "F." After the effective date of this Fourth Addendum to
     Lease, Lessee shall have Leased a total square footage of 21,165 square
     feet comprised of 4355 Varsity, Suite "F" at 14,476 square feet and 4401
     Varsity, Suite "F" at 6,689 square feet.

2.   Lessor and Lessee agree that this Fourth Addendum shall take effect and
     commence on June 1, 2000 wherein both properties will have coterminous
     lease expiration dates with the original Lease dated August 7, 1997. The
     termination date for both Leases shall be midnight December 31, 2002.

3.   Lessor and Lessee agree that the Lease rates for both premises shall be as
     follows:

          June    1, 2000 to December 31, 2000: $  9.72 per sq. ft. NNN
          January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2001: $  9.97 per sq. ft. NNN
          January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002: $ 10.22 per sq. ft. NNN

4.   Lessee and Lessor further agree that if they enter into a new Lease for a
     facility or property owned or controlled by Lessor during the term of this
     Fourth Addendum Lease, Lessee and Lessor agree to terminate the original
     Lease and the Fourth Addendum to Lease and execute a new Lease Agreement at
     the time Lessee takes occupancy of the new Leased Premises. Until the time
     of commencement of the new Lease, Lessee shall remain liable for rent under
     the Fourth Addendum and original Lease.

All remaining terms and conditions of the original Lease and Addendums thereof,
including this Fourth Addendum not inconsistent herewith shall remain in full
force and effect.

                                   HIGHLAND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES LLC (LESSOR)


Date: May 17, 2000                 By: /s/ Mark Lewis
      ------------------               --------------------------------------

                                   Its:  Member
                                       --------------------------------------

                                   GENOMIC SOLUTIONS, INC. (LESSEE)

Date: May 17, 2000                 By: /s/ Jeffrey S. Williams
      ------------------               --------------------------------------

                                   Its: President and CEO
                                       --------------------------------------