alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered March 25, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01629-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF I.C.G., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-07-00258-T

ORDER

By order dated March 10, 2015 the Court stayed the portion of the trial court’s December 

9, 2014 judgment that requires Cashunda Nicholson, the mother of the child who is the subject of 

this case, “to initiate a case with the office of the Attorney General for the child the subject of 

this suit and Mr. Elliot Hawkins (the biological father).” The Court further ordered that to the 

extent such a case had been initiated Cashunda Nicholson must advise the Court within ten (10) 

days of the date of our order of the cause number and style of the case. 

The Court has been advised that the Attorney General, representing the State of Texas, 

has filed a proceeding in the 301st Judicial District Court to establish the parent child 

relationship between ICG, the child who is the subject of this suit, and Elliott James Hawkins, in 

which the Attorney General alleges, “[n]o presumption of paternity exists unless specifically

alleged herein” and does not refer to the issues that arose in the case from which the instant 

appeal arose concerning the claim of paternity by Cyrus Gates. That case has been assigned 
cause number DF-03-02689-T. To protect the subject matter of this appeal, we ORDER all 

proceedings in cause number DF-03-02689-T with regard to the parentage of ICG stayed 

pending further order of the Court.

The Court requests that the Attorney General file an amicus curiae brief in the instant 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of LaSalle Hotel Properties (LHO) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Jon E. Bortz, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive the undersigned Officers of LHO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report, containing the financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LHO.

Date: February 25,
2010



/s/    MICHAEL D. BARNELLOMichael D. BarnelloPresidentand Chief Executive Officer




/s/    HANS S.
WEGERHans S. WegerExecutive Vice President, Treasurerand Chief Financial Officer
NO. 07-07 -044 1-CR IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL D NO VEM BER29, 2007

_________

_________

_________

___ DAVID ST ACY ROBIN ST RAT T ON, APPE LLA NT V. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, APPEL LEE

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 31 ST DIS T RI CT COU RT OF G RAY COUN T Y; NO . 718 9; H ON ORABLE STEVEN R . EM ME RT, JU DG E

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRT LE, JJ. ME MO RA ND UM OPI NI ON Pen ding b efore this Court is David S tacy R obin Stratto n’s Mo ti on to D ism iss A ppeal in w hich he represen ts he no longer w ishe s t o p ursue this app eal. As required by R ule 42.2( a) of the Tex as Rul es of A ppel lat e Procedu re , t he moti on i s s ig ned by Appel lan t and hisatt or ney . No deci si on of thi s Cou rt hav ing been del iv ered, the moti on is g ra nted and2

the app eal is d ismissed . No motio n for rehea ring w ill be e nte rtaine d an d ou r man dat e w ill is sue forthw it h. Acc ordin g ly , t he appe al is di smi ss ed. Pat rick A. Pirtle Justice Do not p ubl is h.
#### Boulder SUTTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 23602.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 8, 1947.

No appearance, for appellant.

*1023Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for theft of a horse, punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The jurisdiction of this court attached by reason of notice of appeal having been given by appellant. He now files his affidavit advising that he no longer desires to prosecute his appeal, and same is dismissed.
#### BETELS v. STATE.

No. 22396.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 10, 1943.

Jesse A. Pardue, of Houston, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for unlawfully practicing medicine, punishment assessed at a fine of $50.

The prosecution was by complaint and information. The complaint recites that the party making it has good reason to’ believe that appellant committed the offense charged, but there is omitted from said ^complaint the further averment that complainant “does believe” appellant committed said offense. The latter averment is a statutory requisite. See Subdivision 2, *500Art. 222, C.C.P.; Smith v. State, 103 Tex.Cr.R. 228, 280 S.W. 581, and cases therein cited. Also, see authorities in Note 11 under Art. 222 in Vernon’s Ann.Texas C.C.P., Vol. 1, and in Branch’s Ann.Tex.P.C., Sec. 478, page 248.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
Order filed May 9, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-12-00040-CV

__________

SIERRA CLUB, Appellant

V.

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY AND TENASKA TRAILBLAZER PARTNERS, LLC, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 201st District Court

Travis County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D-1-GN-1-000763
2

__________

No. 11-12-00108-CV

__________

MULTI-COUNTY COALITION, Appellant

V.

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY AND TENASKA TRAILBLAZER PARTNERS, LLC, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 345th District Court

Travis County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D-1-GN-11-000815

O R D E R

 This court has reviewed the briefs in these appeals and the issues appear to 

be identical. The cases are consolidated for purposes of oral submission. The time 

allotted for argument will be 25 minutes total for Appellants, 25 minutes total for 

Appellees, and 10 minutes for rebuttal. The attorneys are directed to advise the 

Clerk of this court on or before May 30, 2013, as to the division of that time. 

 PER CURIAM

May 9, 2013

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.
Regular Totals (Operators)

Airport = LGA

Operator = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 01/01/2009 (Current & Future)

10/19/2009 11:05:13

Query Parameters:
10/19/2009 11:05:13

Carrier

Regular Totals (Operators)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2009 (Current & Future)

LGA

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 131 

ACA AIR CANADA 36 

AMT ATA AIRLINES (AMERICAN TRANS AIR prior to 2 

AWI AIR WISCONSIN AIRLINES CORPORATION 77 

CAA ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES (code 4 

CHQ CHAUTAUQUA 53 

CJC COLGAN AIRWAYS 29 

COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 25 

COM COMAIR AIRLINES 71 

COX# BRITT dba COA EXPRESS 2 

CPZ COMPASS AIRLINES 2 

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 132 

EGF AMR EAGLE HOLDING COPR. (FORMERLY 106 

FFT FRONTIER AIRLINES 6 

FLG PINNACLE AIRLINES (dba NORTHWEST 13 

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 16 

JIA JETSTREAM INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES 12 

JZA AIR CANADA JAZZ 10 

MEP MIDWEST AIRLINES (MIDWEST EXPRESS 18 

NKS SPIRIT AIRLINES 22 

NWA NORTHWEST AIRLINES 37 

PDT PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC. (FORMERLY 131 

RPA REPUBLIC AIRLINES 19 

TCF SHUTTLE AMERICA 11 

TRS AIRTRAN AIRWAYS (new 3ltr eff 03/22/03) 36 

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 55 

USA US AIRWAYS 80 

Page 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
June 30, 1996 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-20-1996
<CASH>                                           13,582
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 13,582
<PP&E>                                           10,762
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   34,701
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           601,003
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (571,553)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     34,701
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    626
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                354,492
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               19,567
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (373,433)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (373,433)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (373,433)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (4.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit  11

                                 EXPERT SOFTWARE, INC.
                             COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER SHARE
                             (In thousands except per share)



                                 Three Months     Six Months
                                    Ended           Ended
                                   June 30,        June 30,
                               ---------------  --------------
                                1997    1996     1997    1996
                               ------- -------  ------- -------
Net income (loss)..............$  224  $(7,992)   $626  $(7,197)
                               ======= =======  ======= ======= 

Weighted average common stock   
outstanding.................... 7,511    7,481   7,511    7,481

Dilutive stock options.........   508       --     446       --
                               ------- -------  ------- ------- 

Weighted average number of
common stock and common stock
equivalents for primary         
earnings per share............. 8,019    7,481   7,957    7,481
                               ======= =======  ======= =======

Net income (loss) per share....$ 0.03   $(1.07)  $0.08   $(0.96)
                               ======= =======  ======= =======






 Primary and fully diluted net income (loss) per share are the same for all
 periods presented.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.4

SENT VIA FAX
------------

June 8, 2004

Mr. Arthur P. Bellis
The Park Laurel
15 West 63rd Street
Apt. 20B
New York, NY 10023

     Re:  Retirement

Dear Arthur:

This letter agreement reflects the agreement between you and Advanta Corp.
("Advanta") with respect to your retirement from the Board of Directors, as well
as your retirement as a director, trustee or officer of any Advanta affiliate,
which is effective upon approval of this agreement by the Board and the Audit
Committee when they meet on June 9, 2004.

Advanta acknowledges your retirement from the Board of Directors after 30 years
of service and confirms that, under the provisions of Advanta's Omnibus Plan,
you will be entitled to exercise your currently vested options under the terms
of the Omnibus Plan and your option grants at any time until June 9, 2006.

In light of the present interest rate environment and Advanta's current
liquidity needs, you will be permitted to redeem any of your currently
outstanding Advanta Corp. investment notes, without penalty, at any time until
June 9, 2005, upon prior written notice to Advanta.

In the event that the Board of Directors elects, in its discretion, to adopt a
retirement plan for non-executive Board members at any time before June 9, 2009,
you will be treated as "grandfathered" for purposes of participation in the
retirement plan and entitled to receive benefits in accordance with the terms of
the plan.

Please sign below indicating your agreement.


                                   /s/ William A. Rosoff
                              --------------------------------
                              William A. Rosoff, Vice Chairman

    /s/ Arthur P. Bellis
---------------------------
Arthur P. Bellis
June 8, 2004

cc: Martin L. Budd, Esquire
3M Environmental, Health and 3M Center, Building 022405-W-03 

Safety Operations St. Paul, MN 551441000 

October 28, 2013 

Federal Express 

Director, Chemical Control Division (7405M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) 

Room 4146 EPA East 

U.S . Environmental Protection Agency 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

0 

w 

0 

-.a 

w 0 

-o 

Attention : Docket No. OPPT 2004-0112 " 

PFOA Site-Related Environmental Assessment Program w 

Subject: Status Report Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding 

between 

and 3M Company and Dyneon LLC dated October 2004 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

On November 19, 2009, U.S . EPA approved the Phase 3 Work Plan under the 

subject Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Accordingly, and per the MOU, 

3M has resumed the submittal of quarterly status reports . Enclosed for your 

information and records are two paper copies of the July 1 to September 30, 2013 

report and one electronic version that has been copied to a CD (note that both 

paper copies also have CDs included). 

Two paper copies of the report and a CD have also been sent to the referenced 

docket as noted in the cc list below. 

If there are any questions or comments concerning this matter, please contact me 

at 651737-3570. 

Gar Hohenstein 

Ma ager, Environmental & Regulatory Affairs 

Environmental, Health and Safety Operations 

3M - Building 224-5W-03 

St. Paul, MN 55144 

651737-3570 

n_ahohenstein a mmm.com 

p. 1 

CgtC ~ontrol Nomber 

356146 

C) ::0 'am 

-Ir_-i 

C? C 

C7 C7
# MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Product Name: ICYNENE MD-R-210 TM

Page 1 of 2 (F) Spray ICYNENE LD-C-50 TM 6747 Campobello Rd., Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L7, Canada Tel: 905.363.4040 Toll Free: 800.758.7325 Fax: 905.363.0102



### Section 1: Chemical, Product and Company Information

Product Name: ICYNENE MD-R-210 TM

ICYNENE MD-R-210 TM is a trademark of Icynene Inc.

Product Use: SPRAY-ON CELLULAR PLASTIC INSULATION
Product Code: Not Applicable
Revision Date: Oct. 27, 2011



### Section 2: Ingredient Information

Ingredients Cas No: Wt.%:
Polyurethane FoamReaction product of polyMDI and Icynene MDR-210TM Not Applicable 100%

NOTE : This polyurethane foam does not contain any ozone des troying or global warming refrigerants such as CFC’s, HCFC’s, or HFA’s.



### Section 3: PHYSICAL DATA
Appearance:

Solubility In Water: Density: Semi-rigid cellular foam of creamy colour.

Insoluble.
2.0 lbs./cubic foot

Odour: None
Emissions: Safe for occupancy after 24 hrs, no emissions detectable after 30 days.



### Section 4: FIRE & EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA Flammability: Combustion occurs at 400 ° F (material will not sustain combustion on its own) Flame Spread: Less than 25 Smoke Developed: Less than 450

Method Used: ASTM E84 Melting: Does not melt

Flammable Limits: LFL: - not determined UFL: - not determined Extinguishing Media: Water, carbon dioxide, dry chemical or foam.

# MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Product Name: ICYNENE MD-R-210 TM

Page 2 of 2 (F) Spray ICYNENE LD-C-50 TM Fire & Explosion Hazards: Prevent breathing of combustion fumes (smoke)
Fire Fighting Equipment: Firefighters must wear a self-contained breathing ap paratus to avoid breathing smoke generated by combustion.



### Section 5: REACTIVITY DATA
Stability: Stable under all normal conditions Incompatibility: Compatible with all products 

### Section 6: ENVIRONMENTAL & DISPOSAL INFORMATION
Disposal Method: Follow all federal, provincial, state and local regu lations. 

### Section 7: HEALTH HAZARD DATA

Detectable Emissions: No detectable emissions Systemic & Other Effects: Not available Ingestion: The consequences of ingestion of large amounts are un known
Dust Inhalation: May cause mechanical irritation to the respiratory syste m Eye Protection: Use glasses when cutting foam
Skin Protection: Dust from foam cutting may cause irritation 

### Section 8: FIRST AID
Ingestion: Medical advice should be obtained
Inhalation: Remove to fresh air, consult a physician Eye Contact: Flush with water to remove particles
Skin Contact: No special precautions required 

### Section 9: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THE INFORMATION HEREIN IS GIVEN IN GOOD FAITH, BUT NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IS MADE. CONTACT ICYNENE INC. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 

### Section 10: PREPARATION INFORMATION:
Prepared by: Nick Xie
Title: Senior R&D Scientist Telephone: 1-800-758-7325 Date of Preparation: Oct. 27, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berthel Growth & Income Trust I (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
J. Berthel, Chief Executive Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company Planning, Inc.,
the Trust Advisor of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


August 13, 2007                     /s/  Thomas J. Berthel
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                         Thomas J. Berthel
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         Berthel Fisher & Company Planning, Inc.
                                         Trust Advisor
                                         Berthel Growth & Income Trust I
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Apollo Gold Corporation (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
      hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      R.
      DAVID RUSSELL


R.
      David
      Russell


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


May
      12,
      2006








/s/
      MELVYN WILLIAMS


Melvyn
      Williams


Chief
      Financial Officer and Senior Vice


President-Finance
      and Corporate Development


May
      12,
      2006





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 120 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 120

   Stating the disapproval of the Congress regarding the President's 
 unilateral deployment of United States troops as peacekeepers to the 
                 Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 1993

 Mr. Ramstad submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Stating the disapproval of the Congress regarding the President's 
 unilateral deployment of United States troops as peacekeepers to the 
                 Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

Whereas on June 10, 1993, the Clinton Administration announced the United States 
        would offer to send 300 United States troops to join United Nations 
        peacekeeping forces in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia;
Whereas Secretary of State Warren Christopher has stated that these troops are a 
        ``deterrent force'' which will have ``symbolic'' value;
Whereas total United Nations peacekeeping forces in the Former Yugoslav Republic 
        of Macedonia will number approximately 1,000;
Whereas the deterrence strength of these peacekeeping forces is highly 
        questionable since such forces must monitor the 260-mile border that 
        separates the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia from Serbia, Kosovo, 
        and Albania;
Whereas the Clinton Administration has not sufficiently explained why United 
        States troops should be inserted as a ``symbolic'' tripwire into the 
        complex civil war in the former Yugoslavia;
Whereas the commitment of United States troops in the Former Yugoslav Republic 
        of Macedonia opens the prospect of further escalation of United States 
        military involvement in the Balkans;
Whereas 86 Members of the House of Representatives signed a letter to President 
        Clinton on June 24, 1993, expressing their ``strong concerns and 
        reservations about the lack of a well-defined mission for the pending 
        United States troop deployment to the Former Yugoslav Republic of 
        Macedonia; and
Whereas on July 5, 1993, the first contingent of United States troops arrived in 
        the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) disapproves of the unilateral deployment by the 
        President of United States troops as peacekeepers to the Former 
        Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia; and
            (2) urges the President to consult with the Congress 
        regarding the deployment and mission of United States troops in 
        the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

                                 <all>
```