alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 218 (Thursday, November 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 67373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28052]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Title: Uniform Project Description for a Discretionary Grant 
Application.
    OMB No.: 0970-0139.

Description

    Respondents: Applicants for ACF Discretionary Grant Programs.

                                             Annual Burden Estimates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Number of      Average burden
                 Instrument                      Number of      responses per      hours per       Total burden
                                                respondents       respondent        response          hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UPD.........................................           2,838                1                8           22,838
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours.........                                                             22,838
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be 
obtained by writing to The Administration for Children and Families, 
Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., 
Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer.
    OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the 
collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of 
this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best 
assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of 
publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent directly to the following:

    Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 
725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attn: Desk Officer for 
ACF.

    Dated: October 26, 2000.
Bob Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-28052 Filed 11-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Power & Equipment Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, C. Dean McLain, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ C. Dean McLain
----------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer

July 2, 2003
#### CLARK v. STATE.

No. 26233.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 4, 1953.

Reid & Reid, by J. W. Reid, Abilene, for appellant.

Lloyd A. Wicks, Jr., County Atty., Cros-byton, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a ’ conviction for possessing whisky for the purpose of sale in a dry area, with punishment assessed at a fine of $1,000 and 180 days in jail, enhanced by a prior conviction for an offense of like character.

Peace officers had occasion to go to the farm of Leslie Mitchell to make an arrest of a certain man whose name the record does not reflect. They drove to a servant house where the man was alleged to live. Upon arriving at the servant house they saw the automobile of appellant parked near by and appellant’s young son seated therein under the steering wheel. Between the front and back seats of the automobile' two sacks were found, one containing eight pints and the other twelve pints of whis-ky. Also, appellant’s purse was found in the car.

The arresting officer asked the boy “where Pearl (appellant) was.” He replied that she was “sitting in the house there reading.” When questioned 'as to whether the whisky belonged to him, he replied, “No,” he was “just driving for *528her.” Upon being asked if he knew the whisky was in the car, the boy replied, “Sure, I know it.”

Although the officers searched the house and premises for the appellant, she was not apprehended until some eleven hours thereafter.

' It is upon the foregoing facts that this conviction rests.

The appellant did not testify or offer any affirmative defensive testimony.

The trial court submitted the case to the jury upon the theory that the statements of the boy to the officers were those of a co-conspirator.

As we understand it, it is the theory of the state that the boy’s testimony was sufficient to show that it was appellant’s whis-ky in the car and that his statement that he was “just driving for her” and the further fact that the whisky and her purse were found in her car constitute sufficient evidence to support the conviction.

Regardless of when proof is made of the existence of a conspiracy or the acting together, the fact remains that in order to establish a conspiracy or the acting together there must be some evidence of some participation or interest in the commission of the crime, apart from the testimony of the alleged co-conspirator. 18 Tex.Jur., Evidence — Criminal Cases, Sec. 122, p. 213. The participation of another in the crime cannot be established, alone, by the declarations of third persons in the absence of the accused, and there must be evidence apart from any acts or declarations of the alleged co-conspirators which will tend to show an acting together oí the parties. 18 Tex.Jur., Evidence — • Criminal Cases, Sec. 121, p. 212.

The instant facts do not meet the requirement of the rules stated, and we are therefore constrained to agree that the facts are insufficient to support the conviction.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion approved by the court.
09129/06

Response Date 

### Organization National Business Aircraft Association 8040.5 

# l)ocl<--e-t: 

# f

AA-,l01D -0<1 '::J

# 5 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal Jeen discussed? I Person Contacted Eli Corti Regional Airline Association Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association AT.-'\. ATA Dave Lotterr Robert Hackman 

## I Craig Fabian 1\1Lopez 

## j2/z~

12)2>; 

## }Z/Z1 IZJz!!/{/j
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         769,798
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,077,403
<ALLOWANCES>                                   245,688
<INVENTORY>                                    149,618
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,892,361
<PP&E>                                       1,694,470
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,229,612
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,300,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,026,339
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,369,884
<COMMON>                                     9,588,492
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,300,183
<SALES>                                      5,486,847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,846,694
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,290,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,667,712
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             372,325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (111,915)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (484,240)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 23, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20154 Conference Calendar

EDGAR FERNANDO BLANCO PUERTA, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Office of Attorney General; MICHAEL T. SHELBY, United States Attorney (Southern District of Texas); NEIL H. ADLER, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Respondents-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CV-36

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Edgar Fernando Blanco Puerta, federal prisoner #16259-179, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition without prejudice to Puerta’s seeking relief via the appropriate procedural vehicle. Although Puerta has briefed the merits of his claims, he has failed to address the procedural issue presented by the district court’s dismissal of his petition. Puerta has failed to brief the sole relevant issue forNo. 05-20154 -2- appeal. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). His appeal therefore is dismissed as frivolous. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT



The Board of Directors
Extendicare Health Services, Inc.:


On February 5, 2001 we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of
Extendicare Health Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2000, which are included in the Company's 2000 Annual
Report on Form 10-K. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned
consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related financial
statement schedule as listed in Item 14. The financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the financial statement schedule based on our audits.

In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
February 5, 2001




<PAGE>   2
                           EXHIBIT 99.1 - SCHEDULE II

               EXTENDICARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    ADDITIONS           SUBTRACTIONS
                                                        -----------------------------  --------------
                                                          PROVISIONS         FROM                        ACCOUNTS
                                          BALANCE AT      FOR LOSSES      ACQUISITION                   WRITTEN OFF     BALANCE
   ALLOWANCE FOR                          BEGINNING       ON ACCOUNTS          OR           FROM           NET OF       AT END
 DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS                        OF PERIOD       RECEIVABLE      DIVESTITURE    DIVESTITURE     RECOVERIES    OF PERIOD
-----------------------                 --------------  --------------    -----------  --------------  -------------  ------------
<S>                                     <C>             <C>               <C>          <C>             <C>            <C>
Year ended December 31, 1996..........      7,196           7,293               --           --           5,186           9,303
Year ended December 31, 1997..........      9,303           8,111            8,326           --           6,814          18,926
Year ended December 31, 1998..........     18,926          12,698            4,683        2,724           7,684          25,899
Year ended December 31, 1999..........     25,899          11,905               --           --          12,855          24,949
Year ended December 31, 2000..........     24,949          17,945            2,367           --          28,932          16,329
</TABLE>
Nine Months Ended
                                                           September 30,
                                                       1997            1996
                                                  -------------    -------------

Net Income (Loss)                                 $(49,880,121)    $(13,841,768)
                                                  =============    =============

Weighted average number of common shares:
  Shares outstanding at 2/28/97                      2,100,173
  Shares outstanding at 4/30/97                      2,086,839
  Shares outstanding at 9/30/97                      2,254,948
  Shares outstanding nine months ended 9/30/96                        2,100,173

Weighted average shares outstanding                  2,183,196        2,100,173
                                                  =============    =============

Net (loss) per common share                       $     (22.85)    $      (6.59)
                                                  =============    =============
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   8-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,973
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,238)
<INVENTORY>                                     15,758
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,142
<PP&E>                                          57,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 382,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,923
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,085
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   382,973
<SALES>                                        187,526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,526
<CGS>                                          151,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  151,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,550
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,889
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,084
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,876
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,876
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,890
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (175)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,831
<PP&E>                                          12,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,062)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,872
<BONDS>                                        105,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                    (60,153)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,719
<SALES>                                         75,605
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,605
<CGS>                                           57,674
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,007
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,802
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    536
<INCOME-TAX>                                       368
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                168
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,518)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,350)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Record of Contacts

 Docket No. FAA-2012-0271

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Transport Canada Helen Tsai

613-952-4362

8/05/11 Sent email.

Bombardier Joseph Watson

416-375-4054

8/05/11 Sent email.

Regional Airline 

Association

Connie Arnold

(202)367-1252

8/05/11 Sent email.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ORBIT
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1996 AND
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                              30
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    41
<PP&E>                                             307
<DEPRECIATION>                                      32
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,712
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         10
<COMMON>                                           204
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,722)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       402
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    12
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  93
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (420)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (420)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (420)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00236

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF A.S., A C HILD §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323

- 106105

- 17)

January 17, 2019

Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

Th is court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

_____________ ____ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3302 

AN ACT 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center 

in Bay Pines, Florida, as the ‘‘C.W. Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3302 EH

1 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 MEDICAL CENTER, BAY PINES, FLORIDA. 

3 The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center 

4 in Bay Pines, Florida, shall after the date of the enact5 ment of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘C.W. 

6 Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Cen7 ter’’. Any reference to such medical center in any law, reg8 ulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the 

9 United States shall be considered to be a reference to the 

10 C.W. Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

11 Center. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 22, 

2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3302 

AN ACT 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical Center’’. Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs Med- ical center in Bay Pines, Florida, as the ‘‘C.W.