alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 1380

KEN GRYDER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CONCEPT PLUS, LLC; MARK HERRING; VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION; ADP TOTALSOURCE , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 00261

- LMB

- MSN )

Submitted : October 19, 2021 Decided: October 21, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Ken Gryder, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Brian Hardie, Joseph Erwin Schuler, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ken Gryder appeals the district court’s order dismissing , without prejudice , * Gryder’s complaint alleging, in part, that Defendants violated federal whistleblower
pr otection statutes

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court

. See Gryder v. Concept Plus, LLC , No

. 1 : 21

- cv - 00261

- LMB

- MSN ( E .D. Va

. Mar

. 5, 2021 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* Because Gryder cannot save his action by merely amending his complaint, the order dismissing the complaint without prejudice is final and appealable

. See Martin v. Duffy , 858 F.3d 239, 246 (4th Cir. 2017)

.
null

518.18286
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CRA International, Inc. (the "Company") for the
five-week transition period ended January 1, 2011 and fiscal 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ PAUL A. MALEH President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 10, 2011

/s/ WAYNE D. MACKIE Executive Vice President, Treasurer,
and Chief Financial Officer
Date: February 10, 2011


---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 215 (Monday, November 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66558-66559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28394]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-474 and 475 (Review)]


Chrome-Plated Lug Nuts From China and Taiwan

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in these subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission determines, 
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
Sec. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders 
on chrome-plated lug nuts from China and Taiwan would not be likely to 
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in 
the

[[Page 66559]]

United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on August 2, 1999 (64 FR 
41949) and determined on March 22, 2000, that it would conduct full 
reviews (65 FR 16632, March 29, 2000). Notice of the scheduling of the 
Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection 
therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of 
the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and 
by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on June 14, 2000 (65 
FR 37408). The hearing, originally scheduled for August 31, 2000, was 
canceled due to lack of interest by the parties.
    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these 
investigations to the Secretary of Commerce on October 25, 2000. The 
views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3362 
(October 2000), entitled Chrome-Plated Lug Nuts from China and Taiwan: 
Investigations Nos. 731-TA-474 and 475 (Review).

    Issued: October 31, 2000.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-28394 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
----

----

| 1.   | The Report      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|              |   | TELTRONICS,      INC.                                       |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |   |   /s/      Ewen R. Cameron                        |
| May 15,      2008 |   | Ewen R.      Cameron                                        |
|              |   | Director,      President andChief      Executive Officer    |
|              |   |                                                        |
|              |   |                                                        |
|              |   |                                                        |
|              |   | /s/      Russell R. Lee III                                 |
| May 15,      2008 |   | Russell R.      Lee III                                     |
|              |   | Vice      President/Finance andChief      Financial Officer |
|              |   |                                                        |
Exhibit 13  Certification Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)  Pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United Sates Code), each of the undersigned officers of
Gruma, S.A. de C.V. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers
knowledge, that:  The Annual Report
on form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 20-F)
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Roberto González BarreraDated: June 30, 2005
  Roberto González BarreraChief Executive Officer/s/ Juan Antonio
  Quiroga GarcíaDated: June 30,
  2005
  Juan Antonio Quiroga
  GarcíaChief Corporate Officer  A signed original of this
written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11.1

SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            1997           1996
                                                         ----------     ----------
<S>                                                      <C>            <C>      
Net Loss applicable to Common Stock                        (302,870)      (763,581)

Weighted average number of common shares equivalent:
Common shares outstanding                                 3,676,054      3,328,070
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83 issuances and grants            --             --
         Shares used in per share computations            3,676,054      3,328,070

Net loss per common share                                     (0.08)         (0.23)
</TABLE>

Primary and fully diluted calculations are identical.


                                                                              13
Exhibit 31.2 CFO CertificationI, Egbert Ratering, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Sutura, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 21, 2006     /s/ EGBERT RATERING   Egbert Ratering   Chief Financial Officer
fAA- LOUD-Ilbl

I

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization

N:ltiolllli Business Aircraft Association

Regional Airline Association

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Associ.atioll

ATA

Person Contacted

Eli Colti

Da\'c Loiterer

Robert Hackman

Mark Lopcz

Response
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT
OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1,000

<S>                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                                2,569
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         5,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            941
<INVENTORY>                                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          0
<PP&E>                                                              161,369
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        9,152
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      241,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     0
<BONDS>                                                             149,999
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                                 85
<OTHER-SE>                                                           74,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        241,598
<SALES>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     70,367
<CGS>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     50,365
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   14,427
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       5,575
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          2,189
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   3,386
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        (180)
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          3,206
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          0.39

<FN>
THE REGISTRANT HAS A NON-CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jack E. Stover, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015of Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc.;
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: | April 29, 2016 | /s/ Jack E. Stover             
|----- | -------------- | -------------------------------
|      |                | Interim Chief Executive Officer
|      |                | (Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

FRANCISCO J. CASTANEDA,

Plaintiff,

v. 2:22-CV-021-Z-BR

BRYAN COLLIER, et al., 

Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court are the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States 

Magistrate Judge to grant the Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 32, filed by those Defendants who are 

represented by the Attorney General of Texas (ECF No. 41) (“FCR”). Objections to the FCR have 

been filed. ECF No. 45. After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records 

in this case, the Court concludes that the FCR is correct. Therefore, the FCR is ADOPTED and 

incorporated. The Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 32, is GRANTED. The previously filed Motion to 

Dismiss, ECF No. 21, is DENIED AS MOOT. The Motion to Stay Discovery, ECF No. 34, is 

DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff’s Motion for Continuance, ECF No. 43, is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

August 1, 2023

MATTHEW J. KACSMARYK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:22-cv-00021-Z-BR Document 48 Filed 08/01/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID 358
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 5, 2023

NO. 03

- 22

- 00697

- CR

Michael Tucker , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 390TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, J USTI CES TRIANA AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in

the judgment

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Beca use

appellant is indige nt and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apollo Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,  R.
Llee  Chapman,  Chief  Financial Officer of the Company,  do  hereby  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002, that:

     1.  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 13, 2004

                                        /s/  R. Llee Chapman
                                        -----------------------
                                        R. LLEE CHAPMAN
                                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


<PAGE>
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 83-10 Filed 03/17/21 Page 1 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 83-10 Filed 03/17/21 Page 2 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 83-10 Filed 03/17/21 Page 3 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 83-10 Filed 03/17/21 Page 4 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 83-10 Filed 03/17/21 Page 5 of 6
Case 6:20-cv-00477-ADA Document 83-10 Filed 03/17/21 Page 6 of 6
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 15700A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–3921

Mr. Joseph E. Rebman

Rebman, Linhares & Beachem

Counsel to Yield Scout LLC

165 North Meramec Avenue, Suite 310

St. Louis, MO 63105-3772

Dear Mr. Rebman:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter dated May 27, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Yield Scout LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an amendment to your 

current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 

61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and 

(2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the 

petitioner to conduct UAS operations. You requested an amendment to change the company 

name from J.T&T Leasing, LLC, dba Yield Scout to Yield Scout LLC.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 15700

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 
2

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to change the operator name.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Yield Scout LLC is hereafter referred to as the operator. All 

conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 15700 remain in effect.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on March 31, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3250 

Making continuing appropriations for all departments and agencies of the 

Federal Government, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 5, 2013 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

Making continuing appropriations for all departments and 

agencies of the Federal Government, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal Sanity Act for 

5 Appropriations’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS. 

7 There is hereby appropriated for 120 days after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act— 

9 (1) for each project or activity for which budget 

10 authority was provided in the Consolidated and FurVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:20 Oct 06, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3250.IH H3250

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3250 IH

1 ther Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (Public 

2 Law 113–6), an amount equal to the budget author3 ity provided in such Act, as reduced pursuant to the 

4 Presidential sequestration order dated March 1, 

5 2013, to remain available for a comparable period of 

6 availability; and 

7 (2) for entitlements and other mandatory pay8 ments whose budget authority was provided in ap9 propriations Acts for fiscal year 2013, and for activi10 ties under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, such 

11 amounts as may be necessary to maintain program 

12 levels as they existed on September 30, 2013. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS