alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
4:21-cv-01075-P Notice of Appearance of Warren V. Norred 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

MITCHELL RYAN, §

Plaintiff, §

 §

v. § Case No. 4:21-cv-01075-P

§

Grapevine-Colleyville §

Independent School District and §

Jorge Rodriguez §

Defendants. §

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF WARREN V. NORRED

Warren V. Norred, a member of the bar of this Court, enters his appearance for Plaintiff 

Mitchell Ryan. This appearance should satisfy Plaintiff’s need for local counsel as required by 

the Court’s order issued September 23, 2021. 

Mr. McDonald will remain the primary representative for Plaintiff. 

The undersigned prays that the Court is unoffended by this filing about 2.5 hours after the

deadline as instructed by the Court. ECF No. 11. 

/s/Warren V. Norred

Warren V. Norred, 

State Bar No. 24045094

warren@norredlaw.com

NORRED LAW, PLLC

515 East Border Street

Arlington, Texas 76010

O: 817.704.3984; F: 817.524.6686 

Tony McDonald

State Bar No. 24083477

tony@tonymcdonald.com

1501 Leander Dr., Ste. B2

Leander, TX 78641

O: (512) 200-3608

F: (815) 550-1292 

Counsel for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - I hereby certify that on October 1, 2021, I filed the above 

Notice of Appearance in the Court’s docket using its CM/ECF system, which served notice on all 

counsel of record.

/s/Warren V. Norred

Case 4:21-cv-01075-P Document 18 Filed 10/01/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID 104
#### William L. Manny, Plaintiff, *v.*Board of Education of the City of Rensselaer et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Albany County,

August 9, 1957.

*John W. Tdbner*for defendants.

*William B. Jubic*for plaintiff.

William Deokelman, J.

The defendants move for an order dismissing the complaint herein upon the ground that the cause of action did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of an action thereon, to wit, one year.

The accident happened on February 29,1956. Notice of claim was served on March 7, 1956, and the summons and complaint were served on May 22, 1957.

The Charter of the City of Rensselaer (L. 1915, ch. 69, § 78) provides that no action may be brought for a period of three months after filing of such notice of claim.

It is the opinion of the court that section 24 of the Civil Practice Act is applicable.

Motion denied, without costs.

Submit order.
1 5 1 7 WE S T F R O N T S T R E E T S U I T E 3 5 4 TYL E R , TX 7 5 7 0 2 T E L : 9 0 3 - 5 9 3 - 8 4 7 1 FA X : 9 0 3 - 5 9 3 - 2 1 9 3 Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith , Trinity, Upshur, Van Zandt and Wood Counties www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us C HIEF J USTICE J AMES T. W ORTHEN J USTICES B RIAN H OYLE G REG N EELEY 

# T W E L F T H 

# C O U R T O F 

# A P P EA L S C LERK C ATHY S. L USK C HIEF S TAFF A TTORNEY M ARGARET H USSEY 

## April 7, 2015 Ms. Lois Rogers District Clerk, Smith County Courthouse, Suite 204 100 North Broadway Avenue Tyler, TX 75702-7201 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * RE: Case Number: 12-14-00096-CR, 12-14-00097-CR, 12-14-00098-CR Trial Court Case Number: 114-0549-09, 114-0550-09, 114-0551-09 Style: Demaria Travar Woods v. The State of Texas Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the Mandate issued in the above causes. When the District or County Clerk has executed the Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the information below and to return the attached copy to this office. Very truly yours, CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK By:_____________________________ Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk CC: Mr. Austin R. Jackson (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) Mr. Michael J. West (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) Mandate executed on __ 8TH__ day of __APRIL_______________, 2015. Brief explanation of action taken: ___ SCANNED _______________________________________

____________LINDA RHYMES ________________________________District/County Clerk FILE COPY
Slip Op. 99-116

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

___________________________________

:

SKF USA INC. and SKF :

INDUSTRIE S.p.A., :

:

Plaintiffs, :

: Consol. Court No.

v. : 97-01-00054-S1

:

UNITED STATES, :

:

Defendant, :

:

THE TORRINGTON COMPANY, :

:

Defendant-Intervenor. :

___________________________________:

JUDGMENT

This Court having received and reviewed the United States

Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s

(“Commerce”) Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand,

SKF USA Inc. and SKF Industrie S.p.A. v. United States, 23 CIT __,

Slip Op. 99-43 (May 13, 1999) (“Remand Results”), and Commerce

having complied with the Court’s remand, and no responses to the

Remand Results having been submitted by the parties, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on August

12, 1999 are affirmed in their entirety; and it is further

ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this

case is dismissed.

______________________________

NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

 SENIOR JUDGE

Dated: October 28, 1999

New York, New York
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Annual Report of PDI, Inc. (the “Company”) on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nancy S. Lurker, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Date: March 5, 2010
/s/ Nancy S. LurkerChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 24640.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.-

*867HAWKINS,’ Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with driving a motor vehicle on a public highway in Smith County while he was intoxicated.

He waived a jury and entered a plea of guilty before the court and was fined $50. He perfected an appeal to this court. The record is here without statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-91043 and 333-60920) pertaining to the 1999 Incentive Stock
Option Plan As Amended and the 2000 Stock Option Plan, and in the Registration
Statements (Form SB-2 Nos. 333-37938 and 333-57206) and related prospectuses
and prospectus supplements on Form 424(B)(1), of our report dated February 25,
2002 (except for Notes 15[b] and [c] which are as of March 25, 2002), with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Stockgroup Information
Systems Inc. in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31,
2001.


                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

                                        Chartered Accounts

Vancouver, Canada
March 28, 2002


                                       59
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7535

JAMES A. FULLARD,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

PARRIS N. GLENDENNING, Governor; MARTAIN

O'MALLEY; PATRICIA C. JESSAMY, District

Attorney; ALLEN L. SCHWAIT; RONALD WALKER,

Defense Attorney; JAMES V. PEGUESE, Warden,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.

(CA-03-1979-CCB)

Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 6, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James A. Fullard, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

This date was determined giving Fullard the benefit of the

Supreme Court’s decision in Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James A. Fullard seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal

was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir. Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S. 257,

264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229

(1960)). Fullard was given an opportunity to provide grounds for

extending the appeal period, under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A), but

failed to do so. 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

July 25, 2003. The notice of appeal was filed on September 23,

2003.*

 Because Fullard failed to file a timely notice of appeal or

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
- 3 -

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1













                          Independent Auditors' Report



The Board of Directors
Mercedes-Benz Credit Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of Mercedes-Benz Credit
Corporation and subsidiaries and Mercedes-Benz Leasing Mexico, S.A. de C.V. as
of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the related combined statements of income,
stockholder's equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These combined
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements
based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mercedes-Benz Credit
Corporation and subsidiaries and Mercedes-Benz Leasing Mexico, S.A. de C.V. as
of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.





/S/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


January 23, 1998


                               Page 9 of 10 Pages
Exhibit 31.02

CERTIFICATION

I, Joel L. Thomas, certify
that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A of Alliance One International, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Joel L. Thomas                              
|Joel L. Thomas                                  
|Executive Vice President-Chief Financial Officer
|August 6, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations included in the
           Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is
           qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1000

<S>                                                    <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          12-MOS
<CASH>                                                    32,398
<SECURITIES>                                              80,594
<RECEIVABLES>                                             22,757
<ALLOWANCES>                                               1,461
<INVENTORY>                                                4,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         143,440
<PP&E>                                                    15,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                             9,606
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           301,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     31,066
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                      24
<OTHER-SE>                                               258,631
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             301,236
<SALES>                                                   97,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          97,009
<CGS>                                                     72,044
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             72,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          94,053
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            93
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (64,080)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (64,080)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (3.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.00


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 210 (Monday, October 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27799]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice #: 3446]


U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy; Notice of Meeting

    The U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy, reauthorized 
pursuant to Public Law 106-113 (H.R. 3194, Consolidated Appropriations 
Act, 2000), will meet on Thursday, November 9, 2000 in Room 600, 301 
4th St., SW, Washington, DC from 10:30 am to 12 noon.
    The Commission will discuss FY2001 activities, follow-up to its 
report on consolidation, and a review of the Smith-Mundt Act and its 
applicability in this day and age for public diplomacy.
    Members of the general public may attend the meeting, though 
attendance of public members will be limited to the seating available. 
Access to the building is controlled, and individual building passes 
are required for all attendees. Persons who plan to attend should 
contact David J. Kramer, Executive Director, at (202) 619-4463.

    Dated: October 23, 2000.
David J. Kramer,
Executive Director, U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.
[FR Doc. 00-27799 Filed 10-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-11-U
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SkillSoft Public Limited Company (the“Company”) for the period ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Thomas J. McDonald, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: June 9, 2006       /s/ Thomas J. McDonald         Thomas J. McDonald    Chief Financial Officer
ATTACHMENT 6 
Flight Checklist

LED

Motors inactive, safe to 

handle

Low battery, automatic landing

Loss of RC signal, automatic landing

Pre-arm safety check failure,

see troubleshooting guide

Loss of GPS signal, switch to manual

Initializing, please wait

Acquiring GPS, please wait

Autopilot ready, GPS locked

Armed

Safety Button

Motors active, deactivate before 

handling (see reverse)

Flight Modes

Return to launch

RTL

land at the launch point

Stabalize

Altitude Hold

Loiter

Full Autonomy

Standard position 

(altitude hold mode)

STD

fly manually

Loiter mode

LTR

hover

Stabalize

Altitude Hold

Loiter

Full Autonomy

Return to Launch

!

Stand back!

4 6

The motors are 

now active.

Hold left stick downright until motors spin.

1 2 Power on controller;

set to STD and RTL OFF.

Arm 

motors.

Press and hold safety 

button until solid red.

Connect 

charged battery.

Choose a clear launch 

point, and face IRIS 

away from you. 

5 Check 3 LED.

Place IRIS at 

launch point.

Go outside to 

an open area!

Auto mode

AUTO

fly a mission

©2014 3D Robotics | vB DCT0003 | All rights reserved.

Control gimbal

TILT

tilt the camera down and up

Land

CH7

land at the current position

Stabalize

Altitude Hold

Loiter

Full Autonomy

Stabalize

Altitude Hold

Loiter

Full Autonomy
Press and hold until 

blinking red to deactivate.

Hold left stick downleft until motors stop. 

1 2 Disarm 

motors.

Press safety 

button. 3 Disconnect battery. 4Power off 

controller. Postflight

Controller Flight Data

Press and hold the DN button to access the flight data screens. 

Press DN again to toggle between screens.

Lower left stick below 

center to descend.

Set left stick fully down to 

land when near the ground.

Left Stick

Left Stick

Raise left stick above 

center to take off and 

gain altitude.

Move left stick left 

and right to rotate.

Use right stick to fly forward, 

backward, left, and right.

Set left stick to center 

to maintain altitude.

Left Stick

Left Stick

Flight

current flight mode

controller battery level (9-12 V)

GPS signal strength in # of 

satellites

meters from launch point

flight battery level (10.5-12.6 V)

connection strength

current latitude

current longitude

altitude in meters

flight time

altitude in meters

For customer support, contact us at help@3DR.com

or call our support line at +1 (858) 225-1414 

Monday through Friday, from 8 am to 5 pm, PST.

3DR.com/iris/info 

GPS status

speed in m/s

flight battery mAh 

consumed since armed

End your flight at 10.7 V.

Do not exceed 4000 mAh for 

a fully charged IRIS+ battery 

(80% of available capacity).

!
Aug 1, 2015

Submission by: Ryan Wellvang

723 S. Wisconsin Ave Rice Lake, WI 54868 (715)

- 520

- 2968 ryanwellvang@icloud.com Re: Request for more information for FAA

- 2015

- 1754
Dear Sir or Madam, In reply to the request for more information I will provide you with how I feel that this exemption would be in the public interest. The uses in which I plan on using this aircraft would normally require some other type of human and or other manned airc raft to complete, thus either unnecessarily endangering the safety of a person or causing undue cost. Specifics: Forestry consulting: flying over a track of land at a low elevation not safe for conventional aircraft, recording images for review by the client at a later time. This will allow the forestry industry to see up to date images at a lower cost and better resolution than hiring a conventional aircraft, or looking at out of date satellite imagery . Thus lowering operation costs that need to be passed on to the consumer. Insurance claim investigation: In 2006 a State Farm independent contractor was killed w hile inspecting a damaged roof. Since then more and more insurance companies have been relying on independent contractors to inspect damage s. With this technology we can eliminate the need to put people in these dangerous situations. I have the ability to fly above a damaged structure take high resolution images to be reviewed by a qualified claims adjuster back in the safety of their office with real time feeds via the internet, or on site looking a separate display and taking the pictures they need. Not only does this impact the safety of the job but will have a huge impact on unneeded insurance claims resulting in fewer fraudulent claims by independent contractors that are not looking out for the greater good of the public and just out to take advantage of a natural incident to take advantage of the insurance company. With all of these factors this will help lower the insurance premiums to millions. Real estate photography: The ability to see properties from vantage points unobtainable by the normal home buyer, such as roof inspections, viewing large property from above without relying on out of date satellite images. With this powerfu l tool we can get real time images and get them into the purchasers’ hands so they can make a complete informed decision, resulting in fewer complications from incomplete disclosure. As you can see the benefits of my intended uses are looking out for t he greater good of the public. All flights would be made with homeowner approval. Ryan Wellvang
ELITE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES





Exhibit
23.2





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following documents of our
report dated June 29, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements of
Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to
uncertainty about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern),
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the year ended March 31, 2010.





Registration
Statement No. 333-163907 on Form S-8 dated December 22, 2009


Registration
Statement No. 333-132140 on From S-8 dated March 1, 2006


Registration
Statement No. 333-118524 on From S-8 dated August 24, 2004








/S/ Rosen
Seymour Shapss Martin & Company LLP





New York,
New York


July 7,
2010