alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,859
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,787)
<INVENTORY>                                     30,071
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,027
<PP&E>                                         115,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                (33,891)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 215,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,726
<BONDS>                                         85,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,958
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   215,892
<SALES>                                         61,690
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,808
<CGS>                                           66,974
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    80
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,528
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,483
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,045
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,045
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 105

Providing for an adjournment of the House from the legislative day of

Thursday, May 27, 1993, to Tuesday, June 8, 1993, and an adjournment

or recess of the Senate from Friday, May 28, 1993, until Monday,

June 7, 1993.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 27, 1993

Mr. GEPHARDT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the House from the legislative day of Thursday, May 27, 1993, to Tuesday, June

8, 1993, and an adjournment or recess of the Senate

from Friday, May 28, 1993, until Monday, June 7, 1993.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Thursday, May 27, 1993, it stand adjourned

4 until noon on Tuesday, June 8, 1993, or until noon on

5 the second day after Members are notified to reassemble

6 pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, which7 ever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or

8 adjourns at the close of business on Friday, May 28, 1993,
2

HCON 105 ATH

1 pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader, or

2 his designee, in accordance with this resolution, it stand

3 recessed or adjourned until noon, or until such time as

4 may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee

5 in the motion to adjourn or recess, on Monday, June 7,

6 1993, or until noon on the second day after Members are

7 notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concur8 rent resolution, whichever occurs first.

9 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

10 Leader of the Senate, acting jointing after consultation

11 with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority

12 Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the

13 House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble when14 ever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Royal Olympic Cruise Lines Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending November 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yiannos Pantazis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added
by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |  | /s/ Yiannos PantazisYiannos Pantazis
Chief Executive Officer
June 17, 2003
| |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3458 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3458

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To treat payments by charitable organizations with respect to certain 
                    firefighters as exempt payments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fallen Firefighters Assistance Tax 
Clarification Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENTS BY CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN 
              FIREFIGHTERS TREATED AS EXEMPT PAYMENTS.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 
payments made to--
            (1) any firefighter who was injured as a result of the 
        ambush of firefighters responding to an emergency on December 
        24, 2012, in Webster, New York,
            (2) the spouse of any firefighter who died as a result of 
        such ambush, or
            (3) any dependent (as defined in section 152 of such Code) 
        of any firefighter who died as a result of such ambush,
by an organization described in paragraph (1) or (2) of section 509(a) 
of such Code shall be treated as related to the purpose or function 
constituting the basis for such organization's exemption under section 
501 of such Code if such payments are made in good faith using a 
reasonable and objective formula which is consistently applied.
    (b) Application.--Subsection (a) shall apply only to payments made 
on or after December 24, 2012, and before the later of--
            (1) January 1, 2014, or
            (2) the date which is 30 days after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3458

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To treat payments by charitable organizations with respect to certain 
                    firefighters as exempt payments.
```
#### MOORE v. STATE.

No. 26024.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 12, 1952.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. .Blackburn, State’s Atty., o,f Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Upon his plea of guilty before the court, appellant was convicted of the unlawful sale of whisky in a dry area, with punishment assessed at a fine of $100.

The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception, without which nothing is presented for consideration.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual report of LaSalle Hotel Properties (LHO) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jon E. Bortz, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of LHO, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report, containing the financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LHO.




February 21, 2008







/s/    JON E. BORTZJon E. Bortz Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ROBERT MANCINI

v.

CONCORDE GROUP, INC. AND

HOWARD GORDON AND VALERIE

BRADLEY

PETITION OF: CONCORDE GROUP,

INC. AND HOWARD GORDON :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 585 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ROBERT MANCINI

v.

CONCORDE GROUP AND HOWARD

GORDON AND VALERIE BRADLEY

PETITION OF: VALERIE BRADLEY :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 617 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of March, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 27, 2014

No. 04

- 14

- 00504

- CR

Roberto ROSAS , Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- CRS

- 256

Honorable Marisela Saldana, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on August 27, 2014.

_____________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of

the said court on this 27th day of August, 2014.

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
---

Exhibit 13.1

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 
    CEO Certification In connection with the annual report of Getty Copper Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Corby G. Anderson, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Corby G. Anderson Name: Corby G. Anderson
    Title: President & Chief Executive Officer 
    June 23, 2010 A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 20-F to which it relates, is not to be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 20-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.


---
EXHIBIT 21 

SUBSIDIARIES OF STANADYNE HOLDINGS, INC. 

Stanadyne Intermediate Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation 

Stanadyne Corporation, a Delaware corporation 

Stanadyne, SpA, a S.p.A. company incorporated in Italy 

Stanadyne Amalgamations Private Limited, a private limited company incorporated in India (fully consolidated based on the company’s 51% controllingshare, while the remaining 49% is recorded as a minority interest) 

Stanadyne Changshu Corporation, a company incorporated in thePeople’s Republic of China 

Precision Engine Products Corp., a Delaware corporation dissolved on July 22, 2009. 

SUBSIDIARIES OF STANADYNE CORPORATION 

Stanadyne, SpA, a S.p.A. company incorporated in Italy 

Stanadyne Amalgamations Private Limited, a private limited company incorporated in India (fully consolidated based on the company’s 51% controllingshare, while the remaining 49% is recorded as a minority interest) 

Stanadyne Changshu Corporation, a company incorporated in thePeople’s Republic of China 

Precision Engine Products Corp., a Delaware corporation dissolved on July 22, 2009.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3542 

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to exempt fire hydrants from the 

prohibition on the use of lead pipes, fittings, fixtures, solder, and flux. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2013 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to exempt fire hydrants from the prohibition on the use of lead pipes, 

fittings, fixtures, solder, and flux. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Fire Safe5 ty Act of 2013’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3542 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTING FIRE HYDRANTS FROM PROHIBITION 

2 ON USE OF LEAD. 

3 Section 1417(a)(4)(B) of the Safe Drinking Water 

4 Act is amended by inserting ‘‘fire hydrants,’’ after ‘‘show5 er valves,’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 214 (Friday, November 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28259]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency has submitted the 
following proposed information collection to the Office of Management 
and Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507).
    Title: Request for Federal Assistance Form (How to Process Mission 
Assignments).
    Type of Information Collection: Extension of a currently approved 
collection.
    OMB Number: 3067-0278.
    Abstract: Information on the Request for Federal Assistance (RFA) 
form is required to document requests for Federal assistance and any 
resulting mission assignments to other Federal agencies. Other methods 
used to obtain the request portion of the RFA include internal existing 
State forms. No alternative exists to obligate a mission assignment in 
FEMA's official integrated financial management system.
    Affected Public: Federal Government, State, Local or Tribal 
Government.
    Number of Respondents: 56.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 20 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 182 hours.
    Frequency of Response: After a disaster.

COMMENTS: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on 
the proposed information collection to the Desk Officer for the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503 within 
30 days of the date of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the information collection should be made to Muriel B. 
Anderson, Chief, Records Management Branch, Program Services Division, 
Operations Support Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 
500 C Street, SW, Room 316, Washington, DC 20472, telephone number 
(202) 646-2625, FAX number (202) 646-3524, or e-mail address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d00181f040801430c0309081f1e02032d0b08000c430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0adb5b2a9a5aceea1aea4a5b2b3afae80a6a5ada1eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>.

Mike Bozzelli,
Acting Director, Program Services Division, Operations Support 
Directorate.
[FR Doc. 00-28259 Filed 11-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Fruit of the Loom, Ltd.
Registration Statements and related Prospectuses as follows: Post-Effective
Amendment No. 4 to Form S-8, Registration No. 33-18250 pertaining to the Fruit
of the Loom, Inc. 1987 Stock Option Plan, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form
S-8, Registration No. 33-50499 pertaining to the Fruit of the Loom, Inc.
Directors' Stock Option Plan, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8,
Registration No. 333-38953 pertaining to the Fruit of the Loom Inc. 1995
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan As Amended and Restated and the Fruit of
the Loom, Inc. 1996 Incentive Compensation Plan As Amended and Restated (the
"1996 Incentive Compensation Plan"), Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8,
Registration No. 33-59551 pertaining to the Fruit of the Loom, Inc. Executive
Incentive Compensation Plan, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8,
Registration No. 333-09203 pertaining to the 1996 Incentive Compensation Plan,
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8, Registration No. 33-39625 pertaining
to the Fruit of the Loom, Inc. 1989 Stock Grant Plan and the Fruit of the Loom,
Inc. Long-Term Bonus Plan, Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Form S-8,
Registration No. 333-00039 pertaining to the Fruit of the Loom, Inc. 1995
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan and the Fruit of the Loom, Inc. 1995
Non-Employee Director's Stock Plan, Form S-8, Registration No. 333-74077
pertaining to the 1996 Incentive Compensation Plan, Post-Effective Amendment No.
2 to Form S-3, Registration No. 33-52023 pertaining to the registration of
2,178,178 Class A Ordinary Shares, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3
Registration No. 33-52779 pertaining to the registration of 2,178,178 Class A
Ordinary Shares and Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 Registration No. 333-79195
pertaining to the registration of $250,000,000 in 8 7/8% Senior Notes due April
15, 2006 of our report dated February 15, 2000 except for "Subsequent Event"
note as to which the date is March 31, 2000, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Fruit of the Loom, Ltd. and subsidiaries
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 1, 2000.



                                            Ernst & Young LLP


Chicago, Illinois
April 11, 2000
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RACHEL ERIKA PIZAN, a.k.a. Rachel

Erika Alcalde, a.k.a. Rachel Erika Bigler,

a.k.a. Rachel de Alcalde, a.k.a. Rachel

Piza, a.k.a. Rachel Pizan,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-72380

Agency No. A077-970-039

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 19, 2012** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Rachel Erika Pizan, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen

FILED

DEC 28 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-72380

removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400

F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Pizan’s motion to reopen

because she failed to show she was prejudiced by her counsel’s performance. See

Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir. 2003) (presumption of

prejudice rebutted where petitioner cannot establish plausible grounds for relief).

In light of our disposition, we need not address Pizan’s remaining

contentions.

We do not consider the supplemental material filed by Pizan because it is not

part of the administrative record. Dent v. Holder, 627 F.3d 365, 371 (9th Cir.

2010).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3240 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 3, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To instruct the Comptroller General of the United States 

to study the impact of Regulation D, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3240 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Regulation D Study 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE STUDY. 

5 (a) STUDY.—The Comptroller General of the United 

6 States shall conduct a comprehensive study on the impact 

7 on depository institutions, consumers, and monetary policy 

8 of the requirement that depository institutions maintain 

9 reserves in accordance with subsections (b) and (c) of sec10 tion 19 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 461) and 

11 Regulation D (12 CFR 204). 

12 (b) MATTERS TO BE STUDIED.—In conducting the 

13 study under this section, the Comptroller General shall in14 clude the following: 

15 (1) An historic review of how the Board of Gov16 ernors of the Federal Reserve System has used re17 serve requirements to conduct United States mone18 tary policy, including information on how and when 

19 the Board of Governors has changed the required re20 serve ratio. 

21 (2) The impact of the maintenance of reserves 

22 on depository institutions, including the operational 

23 requirements and associated costs. 

24 (3) The impact on consumers in managing their 

25 accounts, including the costs and benefits of the re26 serving system. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3240 RFS 

1 (4) Alternatives the Board of Governors may 

2 have to the maintenance of reserves to effect mone3 tary policy. 

4 (c) CONSULTATION.—In conducting the study under 

5 this section, the Comptroller General shall consult with 

6 credit unions and community banks. 

7 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date 

8 of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall 

9 submit to Congress a report containing— 

10 (1) the results of the study conducted pursuant 

11 to this section; and 

12 (2) any recommendations based on such study. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 2, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS