alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          16,061
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,417
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,638
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,030
<PP&E>                                          14,924
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,914
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,676
<SALES>                                        161,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               161,535
<CGS>                                          142,553
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,553
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,033
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (13)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (38)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       239
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (277)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (3,555)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,832)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.37)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
S.D. WARREN COMPANY'S (THE "COMPANY") CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 FOUND
IN PAGE 4 AND 5, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          45,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,600
<INVENTORY>                                    195,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               317,900
<PP&E>                                       1,187,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 234,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,508,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          257,600
<BONDS>                                        655,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          107,300
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     321,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,508,600
<SALES>                                        343,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               343,400
<CGS>                                          262,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  296,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO

In re:

Extensión de términos por motivo de
concesión de los días 28 de marzo, 26
de julio, 29 de noviembre, 23, 24
, 30
y 31 de diciembre de 2024; 17 de
abril, 28 de noviembre, 24 y 31 de
diciembre de 2025 y 5 de enero de 2026 2024 TSPR 2

213 DPR ___

Número del Caso: EM

- 2024

- 0001

Fecha: 16 de enero de 2024

Materia: Extensión de términos del Poder Judicial.

Este documento está sujeto a los cambios y correcciones del proceso de compilación y publicación oficial de las decisiones del Tribunal Supremo. Su distribución electrónica se hace como un servicio público

a la comunidad.EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO

RESOLUCIÓN

En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 1 6 de enero de 2024

.

La Jueza Presidenta, Hon. Maite D. Oronoz Rodríguez, emitió la Orden Administrativa Núm. OAJP

2023

- 111 de 16 de octubre de 2023, con el fin de dar continuidad a las medidas de control de gastos adoptadas por el Poder Judicial a partir del año fiscal

2014

- 2015. Entre las medidas instituidas
, se decretaron unas fechas de cierres totales del Tribunal General de Justicia entre marzo de 2024 y enero de

20 26.

La Orden Administrativa Núm. OAJP

- 2023

- 111 dispone que los días siguientes serán de cierre total en el Poder Judicial: 28 de marzo de 2024, 26 de julio de 2024, 29 de noviembre de 2024, 23, 24, 30 y 31 de diciembre de 2024, 17 de abril de 2025 , 28 de noviembre de 2025, 24 y 31 de diciembre de 2025, y 5 de enero de

2026. Durante un cierre total
, los Centros Judiciales y otras salas de los Tribunales de Primera Instancia, el Tribunal de Apelaciones y el Tribunal Supremo permanecerán cerrados, con excepci ón de los jueces y juezas de turno que operarán como se acostumbra en un
día feriado

.

Como resultado de lo anterior, y al amparo de nuestra facultad para reglamentar los procedimientos judiciales, al computar los tér minos en las distintas In re:

Extensión de términos por
motivo de concesión de los días 28 de marzo, 26 de julio, 29 de noviembre, 23, 24, 30 y
31 de diciembre de 2024; 17 de abril, 28 de noviembre, 24 y 31 de diciembre de 2025 y 5 de

enero de 2026 EM

- 2024

- 01EM

- 2024

- 01 2

leyes, reglas o reglamentos de los procedimientos y trámites judiciales de los casos y asuntos a celebrarse en todas las Regiones Judiciales, se aplicará lo dispuesto en los artículos 388 y 389 del Código Político de 1902, 1 LPRA secs. 72 y 73. Por tal razón, los días decretados como cierres totales se considerarán como si fueran feriados. Cualquier término que venza durante las fechas decretadas se extenderá al día laborable siguiente.

Se ordena la difusión pública de esta R esolución.

Lo acordó el Tribunal y certifica el Secretario del Tribunal Supremo.

Javier O. Sepúlveda Rodríguez Secretario del Tribunal Supremo
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6831

BRETT C. KIMBERLIN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DENNIS R. BIDWELL, Warden of FCI-Cumberland,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-97-3829-AW)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brett C. Kimberlin, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United

States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s judgment or order is marked as

“filed” on May 22, 1998, the district court’s records show that it

was entered on the docket sheet on May 26, 1998. Pursuant to

Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

the date that the judgment or order was physically entered on the

docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district

court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th

Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Brett C. Kimberlin appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Kimberlin v. Bidwell, No. CA-97-3829-AW (D. Md. May 26,

1998).* We deny Kimberlin’s motion to strike the district court’s

amended memorandum, motion for bail pending appeal, motion for stay

pending appeal, motions for appointment of counsel, and renewed motion for appointment of counsel. We grant his motion to supplement

the record. Finally, we dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTE C TION AGEN CY REGION 8

Ref: 8P-AR Todd Parfitt , Dir ec tor 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver , CO 80202-1129

Phone 800-227-8917 http ://wwiN .e pa.gov/region08 

### JUL - 

### 9 2014

W yo ming Department of Environmental Quality Herschler Building 122 West 25 1h Street Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002 RE: Completeness Determination for Wyoming's Infras tructure State Implementation Plan Submission for the 2010 1-Hour Nit rogen Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standard (N AAQS) Dear Mr. Parfitt: On January 28,2014, the EPA received Wyoming's Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (iS JP) s ubmission for the 2010 1-hour nitrog en dioxide NAAQS. We have determined that Wyoming 's iSIP s ubmittal is administrative ly and technica lly complete for the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) section s 11 O(a)(2)(A), (B) , (C) to the extent it refers to enforcement , to programs for minor sources, and to permitting programs req uired by CAA part C title I , (D), (E)- (H), and (J)-(M). We are now reviewing the s ubmi ssion for future rulemaking action. If you wou ld like to discus s this with me, I can be reach ed at 303

- 312-6298. If yo u require more specific information regarding this subject, the most knowledgeabl e perso n on my staff is Abby Fu lton , Environmenta l Prot ection Spec iali st, who m ay be reached at 303-3 12-6 563 or fulton.abby@epa.gov. I appreciate your partnership as we work together to protect public health and the environment. Sincerely, 

# \j__., \**~** 

# 1\1----
Debra H. Thomas Acting Assistant Regional Administrator Office of Partnership s and Regulatory Assistance

cc: Steven A. Dietrich, Admini s trator, Wyoming Air Quality Division

® Printed on Recycled Paper
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Click2learn, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-68413, 333-83759, 333-42822, and 333-63916) and Form S-3 (Nos.
333-87425, 333-89615, 333-51858, and 333-75480) of Click2learn, Inc. of our
report dated January 30, 2002 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Click2learn, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 2001, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001,
and related consolidated financial statement schedule, which reports appear in
the 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Click2learn, Inc.


KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington
March 28, 2002
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IRCUIT R ULE 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IRCUIT R ULE 47.5.4.

1 7 C.F.R. § 46.2(u) (2005).
27 U.S.C. § 499a–s (1996). 1 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 1, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT )))))))))))))))))))))))))) No. 04-40802 )))))))))))))))))))))))))) FLEMING COMPANIES, INC., Plaintiff–Appellant,

v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Defendant–Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Division of Texas

4:03-CV-380-RAS Before SMITH, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge: * In this appeal, Plaintiff–Appellant Fleming Companies, Inc. challenges the “Batter-Coating Rule,” 1 a regulation promulgated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) pursuant to the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (“PACA”), 2 on two grounds: first, that the rule is invalid pursuant to Chevron U.S.A., Inc.3 467 U.S. 837 (1984).
4 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A) (1996). 2 v. National Resources Defense Council, Inc. ; 3 second, that the USDA’s decision-making with regard to the Batter-Coating Rule was “arbitrary and capricious” in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”). 4 Essentially for the reasons articulated by the district court in its comprehensive opinion on motions for summary judgment, Fleming Companies, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Agriculture , 322 F.Supp.2d 744 (E.D.Tex. 2004), we AFFIRM.
Order entered September 8, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00777-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF JUDY DARLENE MORGENROTH, DECEASED

On Appeal from the Collin County Probate

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PB1-1017-2011

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s September 4, 2015 second motion to extend time to file brief 

and ORDER the brief be filed no later than September 15, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000518

02-JAN-2015

10:25 AM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6564

PERRY L. CRAWFORD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES M. TURPIN; SUSAN MCNEELY; MARY STEINS,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; THE

UTILIZATION REVIEW BOARD,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-01-40-1)

Submitted: May 13, 2004 Decided: May 20, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Perry L. Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. Dana Hefter Davis, Raleigh,

North Carolina; Roy Asberry Cooper III, Marry S. Mercer, Assistant

Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Perry L. Crawford appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Crawford v. Turpin, No. CA-01-40-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Uziel Frydman, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sherwood

Brands, Inc. (the “Registrant”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of theRegistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: October 28, 2004 |                     |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------|
|                        |                     |
|                        | /s/ UZIEL FRYDMAN        |   |
|                        | Uziel  Frydman           |   |
|                        | Chief Executive  Officer |   |
|                             |                          |  |  |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apollo Gold Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. David Russell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




****Date: November 15, 2004

/s/ R. David RussellR. David Russell, Chief Executive Officer





|
|
|
|

|
|
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                             147,508
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,184,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,197,060
<PP&E>                                           1,464,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,603,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,004,837
<BONDS>                                          2,580,213
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            74,390
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,802,630)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,603,350
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,335,397
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,685,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,254,002
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 141,932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    604,817
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (745,634)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (745,634)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.01)
                                               


</TABLE>
OFFICER'S STATEMENT

Harry Puglisi, Treasurer of The Money Store Commercial Mortgage, Inc. (the

"Servicer"), in accordance with Section 7.04 of the Pooling and Servicing

Agreement ("Agreement") dated as of November 30, 1997 wherein The Money Store

Commercial Mortgage, Inc., is the "Servicer" states the following:

(i)    the Servicer has fully complied with articles V and VII;

(ii)   a review of the activities of the Servicer during 1997 and of its
       performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision;

(iii)  to the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Servicer has
       fulfilled all its oblications under the Agreement throughout 1997 and
       there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.

THE MONEY STORE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE, INC.


BY: /s/ HARRY PUGLISI
        Harry Puglisi
        Treasurer
<PAGE>
                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT



The Board of Directors
The Money Store Inc.:

We have examined Management's Assertion about The Money Store Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) compliance with the minimum servicing standards
relating to mortgage loans, commercial loans and auto loans, identified in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers (USAP), except for minimum servicing standard V. 4 which is
inapplicable to the servicing of auto loans, as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1997 included in the accompanying Management Assertion. Management
is responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing
standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Management's Assertion
about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, Management's Assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 1997 is fairly stated, in all material respects.






February 11, 1998