alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
requires a sentencing court to exercise its discretion and weigh the

appropriate factors for and against the habitual criminal statute before adjudicating a person as a habitual criminal "); see also Arajakis v. State, 108 Nev. 976, 983, 843 P.2d 800, 805 (1992) ("NRS 207.010 makes no special allowance for non-violent crimes or for the remoteness of convictions."). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by adjudicating appellant as a habitual criminal.

Appellant next argues that his sentence to life with the possibility of parole after ten years in prison constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. Regardless of its severity, a sentence that is within the statutory limits is not 'cruel and unusual punishment unless the statute fixing punishment is unconstitutional or the sentence is so unreasonably disproportionate to the offense as to shock the conscience." Blume v. State, 112 Nev. 472, 475, 915 P.2d 282, 284 (1996) (quoting CuIverson v. State, 95 Nev. 433, 435, 596 P.2d 220, 221-22 (1979)); see also Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion) (explaining that Eighth Amendment does not require strict proportionality between crime and sentence; it forbids only an extreme sentence that is grossly disproportionate to the crime). The sentence imposed is within the parameters provided by the relevant statute, see NRS 207.010, and appellant does not allege that the statute is unconstitutional. We are not convinced that the sentence imposed is so grossly disproportionate to the

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2

(0) (947

# Pitletta Pickering J.



### ctaS Parraguirre • 

### J. J.

Saitta crime and appellant's history of recidivism as to constitute cruel and unusual punishment. See Ewing v. California, 

### 638 U.S. 11, 29 (2003) (plurality opinion).

Having considered appellant's arguments and concluded that no relief is warranted, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge Jonathan E. MacArthur Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 

### 3

(0) 1 9 4 Th e
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28529]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than November 22, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Cynthia C. Goodwin, Vice 
President) 104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Covenant Bancgroup, Inc., Leeds, Alabama; to engage de novo 
through its subsidiary, Raymond James Financial Services, St. 
Petersburg, Florida, in agency transactional services for customer 
investments, pursuant to Sec. 225.28(b)(7) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 2, 
2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-28529 Filed 11-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
COMPANY SANITIZED PUBLIC COPY OCTOBER 30, 2009

2010/15 PFOA STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM

October 30, 2009

DuPont Submission

APPENDIX 1 – OECD SURVEY

Claimed as Confidential Business Information
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 12, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D2 3

- 1578 Lower Tribunal No. F 16

- 6113C

________________ 

### Angelo Johnson , Appellant,

vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee.

An a ppeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141 (b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Lody Jean , Judge. Daniel J. Tibbitt, P.A. and Daniel Tibbitt, for appellant

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Cooper v. State , 712 So. 2d 1216, 1217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), rev. denied , 720 So. 2d 518 (Fla . 199 8 ) ( “A suggestion that the defendant suborned perjury or that a defense witness manufactured evidence, without a foundation in the record, is completely improper.” ) ; see also Calloway v. State , 210 So. 3d 1160, 1182 (Fla. 2017) (“[E]xperts may
not com ment on the credibility of other witnesses. This limitation is intended to minimize any effect that the expert status of the witness may have on the jury’s reception of the testimony.”) (internal citations omitted); White v. State , 964 So. 2d 1278, 1286 ( Fla. 2007) (“A defendant cannot establish ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel’s failure to call a witness who is unavailable.”); Jacobson v. Humana Med. Plan, Inc. , 636 So. 2d 120, 121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) ( “[T]he doctrine of the ‘law of the c ase[]’ .

. . is that those points of law adjudicated in a former appeal are binding in order to promote stability of judicial decisions and to avoid piecemeal litigation

. ”); Deparvine v. State , 146 So. 3d 1071, 1088, 10 95

– 9 6 (Fla. 2014) ( finding trial counsel’s failure to develop evidence and cross

- examine witness on issue did not “demonstrate deficient performance or prejudice” and was not ineffective because testimony would have little substance on outcome of case ).
2200 IDS Center 

# BRIGGS

BRIGGS N MORGAN 80 South 8th Street Minneapolis MN 55402-2157 tel612.977.8400

October 18, 2012

Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 fax 612.977.8650

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 

### Re: Great Lakes**Aviation~** 

### Ltd. FDMA No. FAA-2011-0672 FAA Case No. 2011NM210012 Dear FAA and Judge Goodwin: 

### 2u!Z OCT 3I
Timothy R. Thornton (612) 977-8550 pvolk@briggs.com The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590



### Huerta v. Great Lakes Aviation Ltd. is scheduled for hearing before Judge Goodwin in Denver on November 27, 2012. The issue concerns Great Lakes' weight and balance documentation at Dodge City. The FAA and Great Lakes have recently settledthat case. Great Lakes, therefore, withdraws the pending requestfor a formal hearing. Thankyou.

TRT/pv cc: K. Lomazow

4850189v2 Sincerely,

# ~·(<~ "> Timothy R. Thornton 

# RECEIVED OCT 2**~** 

## 2012 

# HEARING DOCKET

Briggs and Morgan, ProfessionalAssociation Minneapolis I St. Paul I www.briggs.com Member- Lex Mundi, a Global Association ofIndependent Law Firms
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3302 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3302

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2013

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Bay Pines, 
   Florida, as the ``C.W. Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs 
                           Medical Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER, BAY 
              PINES, FLORIDA.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Bay Pines, 
Florida, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and 
designated as the ``C.W. Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs 
Medical Center''. Any reference to such medical center in any law, 
regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States 
shall be considered to be a reference to the C.W. Bill Young Department 
of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 22, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# AGENCY:

 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                         This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Georgia, (FEMA-1311-DR), dated                         Start Printed Page 6212                        January 28, 2000, and related determinations.                    

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

 February 1, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 The notice of a major disaster for the State of Georgia is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of January 28, 2000:

Banks, Barrow, Bartow, Carroll, Chattooga, Cherokee, Cobb, Dawson, DeKalb, Douglas, Elbert, Fannin, Floyd, Forsyth, Franklin, Fulton, Gilmer, Gordon, Gwinnett, Habersham, Hall, Hart, Lumpkin, Newton, Oconee, Paulding, Pickens, Rabun, Rockdale, Stephens, Union, Walker, White, and Wilkes for utilities (Category F) under the Public Assistance program (already designated for debris removal (Category A) and emergency protective measures, (Category B), including direct Federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Lacy E. Suiter,

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.

[FR Doc. 00-2808 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berthel Growth & Income Trust I (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas J. Berthel, Chief Executive Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company Planning,
Inc., the Trust Advisor of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


November 12, 2003                           /s/  Thomas J. Berthel
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Thomas J. Berthel
                                                 President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Berthel Fisher & Company
                                                 Planning, Inc.
                                                 Trust Advisor
                                                 Berthel Growth & Income Trust I
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 28, 2000, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Financial Services Technology Consortium, Inc. (“Consortium”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Cardinal Commerce.com, Mentor, OH; Inetco, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada; NeoIT, Inc., San Ramon, CA; Online Resources, McLean, VA; and SQN, Rancocas, NJ have joined the Consortium as associate members.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Financial Services Technology Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On October 21, 1993, Financial Services Technology Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on December 14, 1993 (58 FR 65399).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 31, 1999. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 26, 1999 (64 FR 28517).                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-28178  Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Stanadyne Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, William D.
Gurley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen S. Langin, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of our knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ William D. Gurley                                  /s/ Stephen S. Langin
---------------------------                            ---------------------

William D. Gurley                                      Stephen S. Langin
Chief Executive Officer                                Chief Financial Officer
March 27, 2003                                         March 27, 2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

VS. § CRIMINAL NO. 4:22-CR-079-Y 

 § 

OREN JAVENTAY PICHON (1) § 

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ADJUDGING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court has reviewed all relevant matters of record in this case, 

including especially (1) the Consent to Administration of Guilty Plea 

and Allocution by United States Magistrate Judge and (2) the Report of 

Action and Recommendation on Plea Before the United States Magistrate 

Judge. No objections to either have been filed within fourteen (14) 

days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, 

the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate 

judge on the plea of guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the 

Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and defendant 

is hereby adjudged guilty. The defendant’s sentence will be imposed in 

accordance with the Court’s sentencing scheduling order. 

SIGNED April 28, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 TERRY R. MEANS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00079-Y Document 26 Filed 04/28/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 52
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3329 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To enhance the ability of community financial institutions 

to foster economic growth and serve their communities, 

boost small businesses, increase individual savings, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3329 RFS

1 SECTION 1. CHANGES REQUIRED TO SMALL BANK HOLD2 ING COMPANY POLICY STATEMENT ON AS3 SESSMENT OF FINANCIAL AND MANAGERIAL 

4 FACTORS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Before the end of the 6-month pe6 riod beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

7 the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 

8 shall publish in the Federal Register proposed revisions 

9 to the Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement on 

10 Assessment of Financial and Managerial Factors (12 CFR 

11 Part 225 Appendix C) that provide that the policy shall 

12 apply to bank holding companies and savings and loan 

13 holding companies which have pro forma consolidated as14 sets of less than $1,000,000,000 and that— 

15 (1) are not engaged in any nonbanking activi16 ties involving significant leverage; and 

17 (2) do not have a significant amount of out18 standing debt that is held by the general public. 

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

20 171(b)(5)(C) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 

21 Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5371(b)(5)(C)) is 

22 amended by inserting ‘‘or small savings and loan holding 

23 company’’ after ‘‘any small bank holding company’’. 

24 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

25 or the amendments made by this Act may be construed 

26 as limiting the authority of the Board of Governors of the 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3329 RFS

1 Federal Reserve System to exclude a bank holding com2 pany or a savings and loan holding company from the pol3 icy statement described under subsection (a), if such ac4 tion is warranted for supervisory purposes. 

5 (d) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section: 

6 (1) BANK HOLDING COMPANY.—The term 

7 ‘‘bank holding company’’ has the meaning given that 

8 term under section 2 of the Bank Holding Company 

9 Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841). 

10 (2) SAVINGS AND LOAN HOLDING COMPANY.— 

11 The term ‘‘savings and loan holding company’’ has 

12 the meaning given that term under section 10(a) of 

13 the Home Owners’ Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1467a(a)). 

Passed the House of Representatives May 6, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS