alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EXHIBIT 32-1

Benj.    
          A. Smith III, Chief Executive Officer of Macatawa Bank Corporation, and Jon W.
          Swets, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Macatawa Bank
          Corporation, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
          pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1)       
               the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 which this
               statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)       
               the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
               December 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
               condition and results of operations of Macatawa Bank Corporation.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated:  March 15, 2007 |  | /s/ Benj. A. Smith, III
Benj. A. Smith, IIIChief Executive Officer
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/ Jon W. Swets
Jon W. SwetsSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Density for Z-1,1,1,4,4,4-hexafluoro-2-butene (CAS# 692-49-9)
#### JARECKI MFG. CO. et al. v. WILLKE et al.

No. 3837.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

July 10, 1941.

Chrestman, Brundidge, Fountain, Elliott & Bateman and O. F. Wencker, all of Dallas, for appellants.

Roy W. Starnes, of Gladewater, and Hollis M. Kinard, of Orange, for appellees.

*237COMBS, Justice.

This action was by appellees, Mrs. Nettie Willke and her husband, H. H. Willke, against appellants, Jarecki Manufacturing Company, et al., to remove cloud from title to certain mineral interests claimed by Mrs. Willke in several tracts of land located in Orange county, Texas, and specifically described in her petition. The cloud on her title was alleged to be certain abstract judgment liens asserted by appellants against the property wherein Wood R. Alexander was defendant. Appellants answered by pleas of not guilty and by prayer for affirmative relief on their abstract of judgment liens. On trial to a jury, judgment was for appel-lees against appellants on an instructed verdict, from which appellants duly, prosecuted their appeal to this court.

We sustain appellants’ assignment that the evidence raised, the issue that Mrs. Willke held the title to the property involved for the use and benefit of Wood R. Alexander, and therefore that the court erred in instructing the verdict.

It would serve no useful purpose to burden this opinion with an analysis of the testimony on this issue. For the benefit of ap-pellees, should they desire to prosecute a writ of error to the Supreme Court, we are filing as an appendix to this opinion, but not to be at any time published, a full review of all the testimony.

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SkillSoft Public LimitedCompany (the “Company”) for the period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, Charles E. Moran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: June 8, 2005              /s/ Charles E. Moran   Charles E. Moran   Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3487 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3487

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 19, 2013

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act to extend through 2018 the 
  authority of the Federal Election Commission to impose civil money 
   penalties on the basis of a schedule of penalties established and 
published by the Commission, to expand such authority to certain other 
                  violations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY AUTHORITY OF FEDERAL 
              ELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH 2018.

    Section 309(a)(4)(C)(iv) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 
1971 (2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(4)(C)(iv)) is amended by striking ``December 31, 
2013'' and inserting ``December 31, 2018''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY AUTHORITY OF FEDERAL 
              ELECTION COMMISSION.

    (a) Application to Qualified Disclosure Requirements.--Section 
309(a)(4)(C)(i) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
437g(a)(4)(C)(i)) is amended by striking ``any requirement of section 
304(a) of the Act (2 U.S.C. 434(a))'' and inserting ``a qualified 
disclosure requirement''.
    (b) Schedule of Penalties for Each Violation.--Section 
309(a)(4)(C)(i)(II) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 
U.S.C. 437g(a)(4)(C)(i)(II)) is amended by inserting ``, for violations 
of each qualified disclosure requirement,'' before ``under a schedule 
of penalties''.
    (c) Definition of Qualified Disclosure Requirement.--Section 
309(a)(4)(C) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
437g(a)(4)(C)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating clause (iv), as amended by section 1, 
        as clause (v); and
            (2) by inserting after clause (iii) the following new 
        clause:
                    ``(iv) In this subparagraph, the term `qualified 
                disclosure requirement' means any requirement of--
                            ``(I) subsections (a), (c), (e), (f), (g), 
                        or (i) of section 304; or
                            ``(II) section 305.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the earlier 
of--
            (1) December 31, 2013; or
            (2) the date of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 18, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IB 

Union Calendar No. 466 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3608 

[Report No. 113–625, Part I] 

To amend the Act of October 19, 1973, concerning taxable income to members 

of the Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2013 

Mr. NOLAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and 

Means and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

NOVEMBER 17, 2014 

Additional sponsor: Mr. YOUNG of Alaska 

NOVEMBER 17, 2014 

Reported from the Committee on Natural Resources 

NOVEMBER 17, 2014 

The Committees on Ways and Means and the Judiciary discharged; committed 

to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3608 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Act of October 19, 1973, concerning taxable 

income to members of the Grand Portage Band of Lake 

Superior Chippewa Indians. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3608 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Grand Portage Band 

5 Per Capita Adjustment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EQUAL TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PER CAPITA IN7 COME FOR PURPOSES OF FEDERAL ASSIST8 ANCE. 

9 Paragraph (4) of section 7 of the Act of October 19, 

10 1973 (25 U.S.C. 1407(4)) is amended by striking ‘‘pursu11 ant to the agreements of such Band’’ and inserting ‘‘or 

12 the Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indi13 ans, or both, pursuant to the agreements of each Band’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 466 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3608 

[Report No. 113–625, Part I] 

A BILL 

To amend the Act of October 19, 1973, concerning 

Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians. taxable income to members of the Grand Portage 

NOVEMBER 17, 2014 

Reported from the Committee on Natural Resources 

NOVEMBER 17, 2014 

The Committees on Ways and Means and the Judiciary 

printed House on the State of the Union and ordered to be discharged; committed to the Committee of the Whole 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The data schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Boise
Cascade Office Products Corporation's Balance Sheet at March 31, 1997, and
from its Statement of Income for the three months ended March 31, 1997.  The
information presented is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          22,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  296,897
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,900
<INVENTORY>                                    164,748
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               514,326
<PP&E>                                         238,976
<DEPRECIATION>                                  96,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 943,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          323,031
<BONDS>                                        170,016
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           629
<OTHER-SE>                                     420,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   943,107
<SALES>                                        597,871
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               597,871
<CGS>                                          446,999
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  446,999
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               122,577
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,269
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,360
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,909
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,909
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Page 11 

October 29 2015 

Docket Operations, M-30 

U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Room W 12-140, West Building Ground Floor 

Washington, DC 20590-0001 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Attached please find Above All Aerial & Specialty Photography - Ohio's (Above All - Ohio) 

request, as a member of the Professional Aerial Photographers Association, International 

(PAPA), for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations to allow commercial 

operation of its Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems ("sUAS") for aerial imaging to include video 

and still photography. This exemption request is initially for the use of the Inspire 1 sUAS 

manufactured by DJI, an established sUAS company and in accordance with the sUAS training 

and certification program as administered by PAPA. 

Also attached to this letter is the equipment "Above All Aerial & Specialty Photography - Ohio 

Flight Manual" (Manual), which outlines the operating requirements, limitations, and technical 

specifications for the DJI Systems as used by Above All - Ohio. Above All - Ohio has reviewed 

this Manual and has found it to be acceptable for sUAS operations. Applicant submits this 

manual as a Confidential document under 14 CFR 11.35 (b) as the entire Manual contains 

proprietary information that the applicant has not and will not share with others. The Manual 

contains operating conditions and procedures that are not available to the public and are 

protected from release under the Freedom of Information Act 5 USC 552 et. seq. 

Thank you for your time and consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions. 

Sincere y, 

—~ 

Kristina M. Holthouse 

Above All Aerial & Specialty Photography - Ohio 

Corporate Officer 

Professional Aerial Photographers Association-International Section 333 Doc 15-018
#### BLAKE v. STATE.

No. 21695.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 29, 1941.

R. M. Gardner, of Amarillo, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a forgery case; the punishment, two years in the state penitentiary.

Appellant attacks the sufficiency of the count in the indictment upon which the conviction is predicated as being vague, indefinite and ambiguous. With this con-, tention we are not in accord. The instrument set forth therein was the subject of forgery. It was an ordinary commercial instrument, purporting to be a receipt for money paid. Chimene v. State, 133 Tex. Cr.R. 43, 106 S.W.2d 692; Martin v. State, 85 Tex. Cr.R. 89, 209 S.W. 668; Lamb-Campbell v. State, 72 Tex.Cr.R. 628, 162 S.W. 879. The explanatory averments were sufficient to make specific the full import and meaning of the instrument.

That appellant forged the instrument by signing the name of Roy D. Chase thereto is shown by the testimony of a witness who was present and saw him execute the same. That it was in fact a forgery was established by the testimony of Roy D. Chase.

The appellant did not testify as a witness in his own behalf, nor did he offer any affirmative defense.

The facts are sufficient to support the jury’s conclusion of guilt.

A bill of exception appears seeking to complain of the introduction of certain testimony relative an alleged tele*366phone conversation. The hill of exception fails to -state any grounds of objection upon appellant’s part. Upon this point the bill of exception contains only the following: “At the time the above testimony of the telephone conversation was offered as evidence the defendant did then and there in open court object to the admissibility of the testimony, the court overruled said objection, and admitted it as evidence, to which ruling the defendant then and there, in open court, excepted to the court’s ruling.”

A bill of exception to the admission of testimony, to be sufficient, must, among other things, state the grounds of exception urged. The authorities supporting this rule are numerous and will be found collated under Note 31 of Art. 667, Vernon’s C.C.P. The bill of exception before us presents nothing for consideration..

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals' and approved by the Court
Nos. WR-36,242-02 & -03 (Tex. Crim. App. May 9, 2007) (per curiam) (not 1

designated for publication).

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-75,933

EX PARTE FRANK GARCIA HERNANDEZ, JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

IN CAUSE NO. 22048-02-A IN THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT

POTTER COUNTY

KEASLER, J., filed a concurring opinion.

CONCURRING OPINION

I join the Court’s opinion, but write separately to note that today’s opinion is entirely

consistent with our decision in Ex parte Foster, which was issued in May 2007. 

1

FILED: January 28, 2009

PUBLISH
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 215 (Monday, November 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28404]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel in Earth Sciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Proposals Review Panel in Earth Sciences (1569).
    Date and Time: November 29-December 1, 2000, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Place: IRIS PASSCAL Instrument Center, New Mexico Institute of 
Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Daniel F. Weill, Program Director, 
Instrumentation & Facilities Program, Division of Earth Sciences, 
Room 785, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, 
VA 22230; Telephone: (703) 292-8558.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Instrumentation & Facilities 
proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 31, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-28404 Filed 11-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

JERRIDENE H. MOORE,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2014-3089

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. AT-0752-11-0881-I-1.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Jerridene H. Moore moves for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis. The Social Security Administration 

moves to recaption this matter to designate the Merit 

Systems Protection Board (Board) as the respondent, and 

for an extension of time for the Board to file its brief. 

Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Case: 14-3089 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 06/03/2014
2 MOORE v. MSPB

 (1) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 

is granted. 

 (2) The motion to recaption is granted. The revised 

official caption is reflected above. 

 (3) The motion for an extension of time is granted. 

The Board shall file its response brief within 21 days of 

the date of this order. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s24

Case: 14-3089 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 06/03/2014
Exhibit 10.1


Named
Executive Officer Salary Actions


 


 


	
  Name

  	
   

  	
  2005 Salary

  	
   

  	
  Increase

  	
   

  	
  Percentage Increase

  	
   

  	
  2006 Salary*

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  John D. Finnegan

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,275,000

  	
   

  	
  —

  	
   

  	
  —

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,275,000

  	
   

  
	
  John J. Degnan

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  610,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  35,000

  	
   

  	
  5.7

  	
  %

  	
  $

  	
  645,000

  	
   

  
	
  Thomas F. Motamed

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  685,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  40,000

  	
   

  	
  5.8

  	
  %

  	
  $

  	
  725,000

  	
   

  
	
  Michael O’Reilly

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  635,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  35,000

  	
   

  	
  5.5

  	
  %

  	
  $

  	
  670,000

  	
   

  
	
  Paul J. Krump

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  417,500

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  17,500

  	
   

  	
  4.2

  	
  %

  	
  $

  	
  435,000

  	
   

  



 






*     Salary increases take effect April 1,
2006.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**PC MALL, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of PC Mall, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Frank F. Khulusi, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely forpurposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)   the Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2)   the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periodsindicated.

 

ThisCertification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with theSecurities and Exchange Commission.

 
| August 10,  2009    |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
| /s/ Frank F.  Khulusi    |   |
| Frank F.  Khulusi        |
| Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
David M. Kirstein 

Direct 202.331.3348 x 224 

Fax 202.331.3933 

Email dkirstein@yklaw.com 

March 23, 2011

By Email

George Wellington, Division Chief 

Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

 Re: Aeroenlaces Nacionales, S.A. de C.V. (vivaAerobus) Application for 

 Exemptions, Monterrey, Mexico – San Antonio, Texas; Monterrey, 

 Mexico – Chicago, Illinois; and Guadalajara – Las Vegas, Nevada (DOT- 

 OST-2011-0060) 

Dear Mr. Wellington, 

 vivaAerobus has completed its poll of the carrier parties served with its 

application of March 21, 2011 for exemptions pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109 for service 

between Monterrey, Mexico and San Antonio, Texas; Monterrey, Mexico and Chicago, 

Illinois; and Guadalajara, Mexico and Las Vegas, Nevada. 

 There were no objections to the proposed service by any of the carriers served. 

We respectfully request expedited approval of the exemption application. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 David M. Kirstein 

cc: Service List 
Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by email on the 

following persons: 

carl.nelson@aa.com

dan.weiss@coair.com

jeffrey.manley@united.com

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com

sllunsford@fedex.com 

anbird@fedex.com

dvaughan@kelleydrye.com

rbkeiner@crowell.com

msinick@ssd.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com 

jeff.morgan@delta.com 

slachter@lachter-clements.com

pmurphy@lopmurphy.com

benjamin_slocum@usairways.com

howard_kass@usairways.com

robert.land@jetblue.com 

efaberman@wileyrein.com

john.allen@faa.gov 

byerlyjr@state.gov 

brian.hedberg@dot.gov 

george.wellington@dot.gov 

jhill@dlalaw.com 

 

 _______________________ 

 

 Lyndsey Grunewald 

March 23, 2011