alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### REED v. STATE.

No. 24858.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 10, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*799HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged in the County-Court at Law of Travis County by complaint and information with the -offense of unlawfully operating a motor vehicle upon a public street while he was under the influence of intoxicating liquor. He plead not guilty to such charge, but was found guilty by a jury and his penalty assessed at a fine of fifty dollars, from which judgment this appeal is perfected.

Neither statement of facts nor bills of exceptions are brought forward in the record. The proceedings appear to be regular, and the judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before December 4, 2000 to be assured of consideration. 

## Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

*OMB Number:*                     1545-1096.                

*Form Number:*                     IRS Form 9117.                

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                

*Title:*                     Excise Tax Program Order Blank for Forms and Publications.                

*Description:*                     Form 9117 allows taxpayers who must file Form 720 returns a systemic way to order additional tax forms and informational publications.                

*Respondents:*                     Business or other for-profit.                

*Estimated Number of Respondents:*                     15,000.                

*Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent:*                     2 minutes.                

*Frequency of Response:*                     Annually.                

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                     500 hours.                

*Clearance Officer:*                     Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service, Room 5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.                

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC  20503.                

Lois K. Holland,

Departmental Reports Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-28218  Filed 11-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING  CODE 4830-01-U
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO . A

- 5030

- 15T1

P AONESSA COLON & RECTAL SURGERY, P.C.,

Plaintiff

- Respondent,

v.

CERNERO CHILDREN'S TRUST and JMC MANAGEMENT GROUP,

Defendants / Third

- party Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v.
NINA PAONESSA, individually and as Guarantor of Paonessa Colon & Rectal Surgery, P.C.,

Third

- Party Defendant / Respondent.

Submitted September 6, 2017

– Decided

Before Judges Alvarez and Gooden Brown.
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Divisi on, Monmouth County, Docket N o . L

0 825

- 15.
James F. Weber, attorney for appellants.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court

. " A lthough it is posted on the internet , this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited

. R .1:36

- 3.

September 15, 20172 A

- 5030

- 15T1 McOmber & McOmber, P.C., attorneys for respondents (R. Armen McOmber, of counsel and on the brief).

PER CURIAM

R. 1:7

- 4 directs trial judges to render findings of fact and
conclusions of law "on every motion decided by a written order
that is appealable as of right

. . . ." That basic tenet has been
often repeated. The absence of the analysis that leads a judge

to hi s or her conclusion makes our review impossible. After all,
we exercise a limited role on appeal. We do not disturb findings

of fact or conclusions of law unless convinced " they are so
manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent,

relevan t and reasonably credible evidence as to offend the
interests of justice

. " Ro v a Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors In s .

Co. , 65 N.J 474, 484 (1974) , se e also Petrozzi v. City of Ocean
City , 433 N.J. Super. 290, 316

- 317 (App. Div. 2014).
On April 29, 2016, summary judgment was granted to plaintiff

Paonessa Colon and Rectal Surgery, P.C. D efendant s Cernero

Children ' s Trust and JMC Management Group are plaintiff's landlord
and property managers respectively . The underlying dispute

involved the cost of defe ndants ' fit out of rental premises for
plaintiff's use as a medical office.

On June 10, 2016, the c ourt denied reconsideration of that

decision , and separately granted $16,775.77 in attorney's fees and3 A

- 5030

- 15T1

$1,304.99 in costs to plaintiff, without any explanation

whatsoever
. The order awarding fees and costs is now appealed,

and w e are constrained to vacate it. T he matter is remanded for

the judge to comply with the r ule , and render findings of fact and

conclusions of law . We do not express any opini on as to the
appropriate outcome. We do not retain jurisdiction.

Reversed and remanded.
THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20590 

The Honorable Doc Hastings 

U.S. House ofRepresentatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Congressman Hastings: 

September 19, 20 14 

Thank you for yom letter supporting the application submitted by the city of Yakima for a grant 

under the U.S. Department ofTransportation;s Small Community Air Service Development 

Program. 

The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller 

communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares and 

insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of 40 grant 

awards each year, although no more than fom may be to communities in the san1e State. To 

provide communities with latitude i11 developing solutions to theirair service deficiencies, the 

statute provides ~exibility in the types of air service development projects that can be funded. 

On June 30, the Department issued an order setting a deadline of July 31 for applications. As 

these grant requests are pending before the Department, I cannot comment on the merits of any 

particularproposal. I assure you, however, that the Department will give full and fair 

consideration to all proposals that have been properly filed. 

As is our standard practice, I am placing a copy of your letter and this response in Docket 

DOT-OST-2014-0113 as a contact outside the record of this matter. I appreciate your interest in 

this program. 

Anthony R. Foxx 
DOC HASTINGS 

COMMITTEE ON 

NATURAL RESOURCES 

CHAIRMAN 

C!ongregg of tbt WnUeb ~tate£i 

j!}ouse of ~epresentatib£5 

Ms. Brooke Chapman 

Associate Director 

July 29, 2014 

Small Community Air Service Development Program 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Secretary Foxx, 

l103lONGWORTH HOi.ISE OFF-ttE Bun.omG 

WASiftt,QTON. DC 20515 

t2o2l 22:.-sa1s 

2715 SAHH ANDREWS LtKJP, Sunf 0 

PASCO, WA 99301 

(509) 54l-9396 

402 EAST YAI(,MA AVE-"iU~. SUIT"€ 7GO 

YMIMA, WA 98901 

!509) 452-32d3 

www.huotinus.hott$e.gov 

I write today to request full and fair consideration for the grant application submitted by 

the City of Yakima, Washington, under the Small Community Air Service Development 

Program (SCASDP). 

Access to safe, affordable, and efficient transportation is critical for rural and underserved 

areas- this is no more evident than in Central Washington. Ensuring that our aviation system is 

integrated, and has the ability to move people and products throughout Central Washington and 

acr-oss our nation safely and efficient is vital. As a result, I request that full and fair 

consideration be given to the City of Yakima and its SCASDP grant application. 

Thank you for your consideration of this request. Should you have additional questions, 

please do not hesitate to contact myself or Annick Miller on my staff at (202) 225-5816. 

?2&:- Doc Hastings 

Member ofCongress
#### ODEN v. STATE.

No. 24359.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 27, 1949.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of drunken driving and given a penalty of 60 days in jail.

We adopt the portion of the brief of the State’s Attorney as follows:

“We think the evidence sufficient to support this conviction, and appellant’s amended motion for new trial was overruled on the 19'th day of November, 1948, and he was allowed sixty days in which to file bills of exception, which said sixty days would have expired on the 18th day of January, 1949. Thereafter, on January 29, 1949, there was filed in the office of the County Clerk of Sherman County an order of the court extending the time in which to prepare and file bills of exception and, statement of facts to any time not exceeding eighty days from November 19, 1948, said order having been filed after the sixty-day period allowed by order of the court in which to file bills of exception.

“Thereafter, on February 4, 1949, another order was entered by the court extending the time in which to prepare and file the statement of facts to and including the 14th day of February, 1949.

“Without an order by the court, the appellant, by statute, has ninety days from the overruling of the motion for new trial and giving of notice of appeal, in which to prepare and file a statement of facts, but without a court order, has only thirty days in which to prepare and file bills of exception; and the court is without authority to extend the time in which •to file bills of exception after the time has expired under the statute, or the extended time under the order of the court. Simpson v. State, 110 Tex.Cr.R. 399, 10 S. W.2d 567; Malone v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 75 S.W.2d 104; Smith v. State, 144 Tex.Cr.R. 152, 161 S.W.2d 492; Snyder v. State, 149 Tex.Cr.R. 636, 198 S.W.2d 108.”

The testimony seems sufficient to show appellant’s erratic driving while proceeding down the highway; and soon thereafter, upon the arrival of the sheriff, he was found in a drunken condition and in possession of a partly consumed four-fifths bottle of-whiskey in his car.

We think the facts are sufficient to uphold the verdict of the jury.

The judgment will be affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



I, Robert W. Zack, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Annual Report of Catalytica Energy Systems, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Catalytica Energy Systems, Inc.



By:

/s/    Robert W. ZackName:  Robert W. Zack Title:    Chief Financial Officer Date:    March 30,
2004
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27587]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Notice of Change in Subject of Meeting; Sunshine Act Meeting

    The National Credit Union Administration Board determined that its 
business required the deletion of the following item from the 
previously announced closed meeting (Federal Register, Vol. 65, No. 
201, page 61364-61365, October 17, 2000) scheduled for Thursday, 
October 20, 2000.

2. One (1) Personnel Matter. Closed pursuant to exemptions (2) and (6).

    The Board voted unanimously that agency business required that this 
item be removed from the closed agenda. The item has been resolved by 
notation vote. Earlier announcement of this change was not possible.
    The previously announced items were:

1. Budget Reprogramming. Closed pursuant to exemptions (4) and (6).
2. Two (2) Personnel Matters. Closed pursuant to exemptions (2) and 
(6).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Becky Baker, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone (703) 518-6304.

Becky Baker,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-27587 Filed 10-23-00; 2:11 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
ji

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

JEROME GRAY

NO. 2023 KW 1308

In Re: Jerome Gray, applying for supervisory writs, 18th

Judicial District Court, Parish of Iberville, No. 267- 

16. 

BEFORE: THERIOT, PENZATO, AND GREENE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

MRT

ARP

HG
Third District Court of Appeal 

State of Florida 

Opinion filed February 6, 2019. 

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. 

________________ 

No. 3D18-1897 

Lower Tribunal No. 17-8390 

________________ 

Andres Sultan Osechas, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

Sarah Correa Arcila, 

Respondent. 

 On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade 

County, Jose M. Rodriguez, Judge. 

 Wicker Smith O'Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A. and Alyssa M. Reiter and Brandon 

J. Hechtman (Fort Lauderdale), for petitioner. 

 Michael T. Flanagan; James C. Blecke, for respondent. 

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ. 

 PER CURIAM. 

 Petition denied. 
 2 

Andres Sultan Osechas v. Sarah Correa Arcila 

Case No. 3D18-1897 

SCALES, J. specially concurring. 

 I concur in the denial of the petition because the limitations of our review – 

i.e., the exacting certiorari standard – require this result. At the risk, though, of 

sounding like a broken record,1

 I again encourage the Florida Bar’s Appellate Rules 

Committee to consider adding to the schedule of non-final appealable orders found 

in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3) those orders granting leave to 

amend a complaint to add punitive damages. Given how such interlocutory orders 

materially alter the course of civil litigation, I fail to see how the certiorari standard 

is more appropriate than an appellate standard. TRG Desert Inn Venture, Ltd. v. 

Berezovsky, 194 So.3d 516, 520 n.5 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Levin v Pritchard, No. 

3D17-2711 *2 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct. 31, 2018). 

 

1

 Primitive people used to listen to music on things called “records” made of vinyl. 

The record revolved on a platter called a “turntable,” and a “stylus” would magically 

convert into music the hidden indentations in the grooves of such records. Upon 

encountering a dust particle embedded in such a groove, the stylus would become 

temporarily unseated from the groove. Because of the turntable’s revolution, when 

the stylus reconnected with the groove, the listener would hear the same portion of 

the music heard immediately prior to the stylus encountering the dust 

particle. Hence, the same music repeated over and over until the dust particle became 

dislodged or the listener manually adjusted the stylus. The aggravated listener often 

referred to the record containing dusty grooves as a “broken record.”
Exhibit 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-52723), pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option Plan and the
Directors Stock Option Plan of Cunningham Graphics International, Inc. and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-86345) pertaining to the Cunningham
Graphics International, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, of our report dated
February 1, 2000 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Cunningham Graphics International, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP


Metro Park, New Jersey
March 27, 2000
EXHIBIT 99.1
                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C
                                  SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winfield Capital Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Paul A. Perlin, Chief Executive Officer and R. Scot Perlin, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Paul A. Perlin
------------------
Paul A. Perlin
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ R. Scot Perlin
------------------
R. Scot Perlin
Chief Financial Officer




November 13, 2002

                                      -21-
1... See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-074-CV

IN RE CBCINNOVIS, INC. RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and

motion for temporary stay and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary

stay are denied.

Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let

execution issue.

JOHN CAYCE

CHIEF JUSTICE

PANEL A: CAYCE, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and MCCOY, JJ.

MCCOY, J. would request oral argument.
2

DELIVERED: April 17, 2008
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3383 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend to all veterans with 

a serious service-connected injury eligibility to participate in the family 

caregiver services program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2013 

Ms. ESTY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend to all 

veterans with a serious service-connected injury eligibility 

to participate in the family caregiver services program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Caregivers Expansion 

5 and Improvement Act of 2013’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3383 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION TO ALL VETERANS WITH A SERIOUS 

2 SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY OF ELIGI3 BILITY FOR PARTICIPATION IN FAMILY CARE4 GIVER PROGRAM. 

5 Section 1720G(a)(2)(B) of title 38, United States 

6 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘on or after September 11, 

7 2001’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF BERTHEL GROWTH & INCOME
TRUST I AS OF MARCH 31, 1998, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF
THE TRUST FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,912
<SECURITIES>                                 8,293,747
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,167
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,000,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,302
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,395,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          944,147
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,450,981
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,450,981
<SALES>                                        145,647
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               145,647
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                77,693
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 67,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             67,954
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    67,954
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.45<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.45
<FN>
<F1>NET INCOME PER BENEFICIAL SHARE IS BASED ON THE WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF SHARES
OUTSTANDING WHICH WAS 10,541 SHARES FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>