alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Legal Services Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

The Committee on Provision for the Delivery of Legal Services of the Legal Services Corporation Board of Directors will meet on November 10, 2000. The meeting will begin at 2 p.m. and continue until the Committee concludes its agenda. 

# LOCATION:

Marriott at Metro Center, 775 12th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 

# STATUS OF MEETING:

Open. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

1. Approval of agenda. 

2. Approval of the minutes of the Committee's meeting of September 17, 2000. 

3. Staff presentation on LSC's efforts to define, measure and ensure quality in the services provided by LSC grantees and through state justice communities. 

4. Report by Danilo Cardona, Director of the Office of Compliance & Enforcement, and Mike Genz, Director of the Office of Program Performance, on the progress of LSC's Results Project. 

5. Staff report on the 2001 conference on client-centered legal services. 

                        6. Presentation by Ester Lardent, on behalf of the ABA's Standing Committee on Legal Aid and Indigent Defendants, on corporate                         *pro bono.*

7. Update by Randi Youells, Vice President for Programs, on Competition and State Planning. 

8. Consider and act on other business. 

9. Public comment.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:

Victor M. Fortuno, Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 336-8800. 

# SPECIAL NEEDS:

                        Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. Individuals who have a disability and need an                               ( print page 66565)                            accommodation to attend the meeting may notify Shannon Nicko Adaway, at (202) 336-8800.                     

Dated: November 1, 2000. 

Victor M. Fortuno, 

Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-28463 Filed 11-1-00; 4:56 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
ONGOING and Past SATISFACTION SURVEYS UNDER 1845-0045

Dated 3/25/2013

1

Annual Direct Loan School Customer Satisfaction Survey

Training Information Services Division – TISD Training and follow-up surveys

FAFSA on the Web (FOTW) Survey

Loan Choice for FFEL Borrowers Survey

Tools for School Training Survey

Federal Student Aid Awareness Survey

Student Aid and Applicant Services Survey

FFEL Borrower Servicing Survey

Long Beach Awareness Survey

EDExpress Use Survey 

EDExpress Basics Survey 

Quality Assurance Program Survey

Editorial Services Customer Satisfaction Survey

Fall Conference Survey

Defaulted Loan Survey

Social Media Survey

Multiple Servicers Satisfaction Survey (3)

Fundamentals of Title IV Training Survey

Ombudsman Customer Satisfaction Survey

FSA for Counselors Training Survey

Student Aid on the Web (SAOTW) Survey

Enterprise Operational Change Management Customer Satisfaction Survey

SA Pubs Focus Group Feedback Guide

FSA Communications Messaging Customer Service Survey
ONGOING and Past SATISFACTION SURVEYS UNDER 1845-0045

Dated 3/25/2013

2

Customer Satisfaction Survey for the Quality Assurance Program

Ease of Doing Business with FSA-School Partners Customer Satisfaction Survey

Creative Review Focus Groups

Online Interviews to Evaluate Website and Social Media Site

Website Usability Testing

Leadership and Management Seminar Evaluation

Optional Point-of-Service Online Customer Satisfaction Survey for Accenture Use with School Services’ 

and Applicant Services’ Customers: January 2013
#### NORTHCUTT v. STATE.

No. 23771.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 11, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for driving and operating a motor vehicle upon the public highway while under 'the influence of intoxicating liquor. The penalty assessed is a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The complaint and information, as well as all other matters of procedure, appear to be in regular form. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 1 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk June 1 , 2018

15 7 8 35 ( 27 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

, SC: 15 7 8 35

v C OA: 3 42075
Wayne CC: 09

- 003770

- FC

DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON

, Defendant

- Appellant

.

__________________________________ ______ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellant to file an application for leave to appeal in excess of the page limitation is DENI ED . The only issue

reviewable by this Court at this time is whether the Court of Appeals erred in dismissing

the defendant

- appellant’s delayed application for leave to appeal on jurisdictional grounds

because he failed to file it within the time period required by MCR 7.205(G)(3). The

substantive issues in the defendant

- appellant’s application that cause it to exceed the page

limitation cannot be reviewed by this Court on their merits. The defendant

- appellant shall

file a substitute application for leave to appea l within 35 days of the date of this order

addressing the jurisdictional issue only. Failure to timely file the substitute application will

result in the administrative dismissal of this case.
Preliminary Order of Forfeiture – Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

CLOIS GLENN RABORN (01)

NO. 4:22-CR-066-O

PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

Before the court is the government’s unopposed Motion for a Preliminary Order of 

Forfeiture. After consideration, the court determines the motion should be and is hereby 

granted.

The government notified the defendant that it would seek to a Silver HP Laptop 

computer serial number 5CH1411BW3 and a Silver MultiCard 16GB USB serial number 

0XECC3800678047 (“the property”) upon the defendant’s conviction on Count One the

information. The defendant pled guilty to that offense and described in a factual resume 

how the property was involved. 

Based on the defendant’s guilty plea and factual resume, the court finds the 

property is subject to forfeiture to the government pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2253. It is 

therefore ordered that the property is forfeited to the government, subject to the 

provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 853(n). 

It is further ordered that, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(g) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2, 

the Attorney General (or its designee) shall seize the property and hold it in its secure 

custody and control pending a final order of forfeiture. 

Case 4:22-cr-00066-O Document 36 Filed 06/23/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID 100
Preliminary Order of Forfeiture – Page 2

It is further ordered that, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(1) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 

32.2, the Attorney General shall publish notice of the forfeiture order for at least 30 

consecutive days on an official government Internet site (www.forfeiture.gov). The 

notice shall state the government’s intent to dispose of the property and state that any 

person, other than the defendant, having or claiming a legal interest in the property must 

file a petition with the court no later than 60 days after the first day of the publication and 

serve a copy on Asset Forfeiture Section, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of 

Texas, 1100 Commerce Street, Third Floor, Dallas, Texas 75242. The petition shall be 

for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of the petitioner’s alleged interest in the property; 

shall be signed by the petitioner under penalty of perjury; and shall set forth the nature 

and extent of the petitioner's right, title, or interest in the property, the time and 

circumstances of the petitioner’s acquisition of the right, title, or interest in the property, 

and any additional facts supporting the petitioner’s claim and the relief sought. The 

government shall send, by means reasonably calculated to reach the person, written 

notice to any person who reasonably appears to be a potential claimant with standing to 

contest the forfeiture. 

Upon adjudication of all third-party interests, this court will enter a final order of 

forfeiture addressing those interests.

SO ORDERED.

Signed June 23, 2022.

 

REED O’CONNOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:22-cr-00066-O Document 36 Filed 06/23/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID 101
United States Court of Appeals

FIFTH CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

LYLE W. CAYCE

CLERK

TEL. 504-310-7700

600 S. MAESTRI PLACE, 

Suite 115

NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130

September 06, 2024

Ms. Karen S. Mitchell

Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth

United States District Court

501 W. 10th Street

Room 310

Fort Worth, TX 76102

No. 24-10656 Sambrano v. United Airlines

USDC No. 4:21-CV-1074

Dear Ms. Mitchell,

Enclosed is a copy of the judgment issued as the mandate.

 Sincerely,

LYLE W. CAYCE, Clerk

 By: _________________________

Lisa E. Ferrara, Deputy Clerk

504-310-7675

cc w/encl:

Mr. Ethan D. Beck

Mr. Russell Daniel Cawyer

Mr. Brian Field

Mr. Alexander Virgil Maugeri

Mr. Hashim M. Mooppan

Mr. Donald James Munro

Mr. Mark R. Paoletta

Mr. Gene C. Schaerr

Mr. Esteban Shardonofsky

Mrs. Cristina Martinez Squiers

Mr. John Clay Sullivan

Case: 24-10656 Document: 48-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2024

Case 4:21-cv-01074-P Document 276-1 Filed 09/06/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 19329
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION  OF  PERIODIC  FINANCIAL  REPORT
(Pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002)

I,  R.  David  Russell,  Chief Executive Officer of Apollo Gold Corporation (the
"Company"),  do  hereby  certify  in  accordance  with  U.S. C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.  The  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  for  the quarterly period ended
     September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
     the  date  hereof  (the  "Periodic  Report"),   fully   complies  with  the
     requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934,  as  amended;  and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  November 14, 2003

                    /s/ R. David Russell
                    ---------------------------
                    R. DAVID RUSSELL
                    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Cyco.net,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  each  of the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.   The information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date:  April 12, 2004                    By:  /s/ Richard Urrea
                                             -----------------------------------
                                              Richard Urrea, President and Chief
                                              Executive Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cyco.net,  Inc. and will
be retained by Cyco.net,  Inc.  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3542 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3542

 To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to exempt fire hydrants from the 
 prohibition on the use of lead pipes, fittings, fixtures, solder, and 
                                 flux.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2013

 Mr. Johnson of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to exempt fire hydrants from the 
 prohibition on the use of lead pipes, fittings, fixtures, solder, and 
                                 flux.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Fire Safety Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTING FIRE HYDRANTS FROM PROHIBITION ON USE OF LEAD.

    Section 1417(a)(4)(B) of the Safe Drinking Water Act is amended by 
inserting ``fire hydrants,'' after ``shower valves,''.
                                 <all>
```
NAICS: 999300 May 2014 data

Local Government 

Labor Category: Formula Managerial Technical Clerical

Unloaded Hourly Rate1 = W $39.38 $29.78 $18.29

Benefits Percentage2 Lb = B/W 46.3% 46.3% 46.3%

Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $18.24 $13.79 $8.47

Loaded Hourly Rate Wb = W + B = W(1+Lb) $57.62 $43.57 $26.76

Overhead Percentage3 Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50%

Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo $28.81 $21.79 $13.38

Fully Loaded Hourly Rate Wf = Wb + OH
 = W + B + OH $86.43 $65.36 $40.14

1. Data Source: BLS http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_999300.htm

 NAICS 999300 - Local Government 

NAICS: 999100 May 2014 data

EPA or Federal Government

Labor Category: Formula Managerial Technical Clerical

Unloaded Hourly Rate1 = W $ 56.54 $ 37.15 $ 21.15

Benefits Percentage2 Lb = B/W 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $ - $ - $ -

Loaded Hourly Rate Wb = W + B = W(1+Lb) $56.54 $37.15 $21.15

Overhead Percentage3 Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50%

Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo $ 28.27 $ 18.58 $ 10.58

Fully Loaded Hourly Rate Wf = Wb + OH
 = W + B + OH $84.81 $55.73 $31.73

1. Data Source: BLS http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_999100.htm 

 NAICS 999100 - Federal Executive Branch
Anthony G. Bosbous - Mayor

~p~,---

ANTHONYB. BOSBOUS,Mayor

City of Sault Ste. Marie

225E.PortageAve., Sault Ste.Marie. MI 49783. Phone:906/635-5261 . Fax:906/635-5606. www.saultcity.com

The City of Sault Ste. Mane 1.$ an equal opportunity proVider and employer.

PU R e1-tl CH IGAN'

/

July 24, 2013

sg

cc Kathy Noel- noeledc@lighthouse.net

Spencer Nebel, City Manager

Robin Troyer, City Clerk/Assistant City Manager

On behalf of the City of Sault Ste. Marie I would encourage you to accept the proposal from Delta

Airlines to continue with Essential PassengerAir Service to Sault Ste. Marie. If I can provide any

additional information, pleasefeel free to contact me.

The City of Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan has reviewed the proposal for Essential Air Serviceat Sault Ste.

Marie which was submitted by Delta Airlines. The City concurs with the proposal submitted by Delta to

continue providing service to the Chippewa County International Airport near Sault Ste. Marie.

Commercial passengerair service is essential to the economy of Sault Ste. Marie and the Eastern Upper

Peninsula. Over the years Delta has been a reliable provider of services at the Chippewa County

International Airport.

Dear Mr. Adams:

RE: Delta Airlines - Chippewa County International Airport

Mr. KevinAdams

Kevin.Adams@dot.gov
August 6, 2010 

Eleanor Ku Codding, P.E. 

Eastern Research Group, Inc. 

14555 Avion Parkway, Suite 200 

Chantilly, VA 20151-1102 

Subject: Carolina Power & Light Company d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. 

 Asheville Steam Electric Plant 

 Response to EPA’s CWA Section 308 and RCRA Section 3007 

Information Request 

 

Dear Ms. Codding: 

On June 11, 2010 Carolina Power & Light Company d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, 

Inc. (PEC) Asheville Steam Electric Plant located in Buncombe County, North Carolina, 

received notification of the Information Request from the Environmental Protection 

Agency’ s (EPA’s) Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. Response to this 

request is being submitted by August11, 2010, as agreed upon by EPA and PEC. 

PEC’s response to the request, enclosed, consists of hard copies of associated maps and 

electronic copies of the response text and associated Appendices. All maps are marked 

with their respective scales and primary features on the maps are identified with numbers 

corresponding to their identification as a management area per Question 3 of the 

response. The electronic files are provided as portable document format (pdf) files, 

created using Adobe Acrobat® 8 Standard, Version 8.1.3. The following files are 

included: 

1. EPA CWA RCRA Response_PEC_Asheville; 85 kilobytes (KB), created 

August 5, 2010, 4:24 p.m. 

2. EPA CWA RCRA Response_PEC_Asheville_Figures; 6,814 KB, created 

August 5, 2010, 6:12 a.m. 

3. EPA CWA RCRA Response_PEC_Asheville_Appendices; 77,481 KB, created 

August 5, 2010, 3:32 p.m. 

If you have any questions please contact Mr. Fred Holt at (919) 546-5286. 
EPA CWA RCRA Response 

Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., Asheville Plant 

August 6, 2010 

Page 2 

I certify, under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my 

direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel 

properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or 

persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, 

the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I 

am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the 

possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations. 

Sincerely, 

Garry A. Whisnant 

Plant Manager, Asheville Plant 

Enclosures 

GAW/mmm 

cc: Laurie Moorhead 

 Fred Holt
#### FLETCHER v. STATE.

No. 22929.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 23, 1944.

Earl Shelton, of Austin, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The offense is burglary. On account of one previous conviction for a felony less than capital, which was set forth in the indictment, the penalty assessed was confinement in the penitentiary for twelve ■years.

The record is before this court without bills of exceptions or statement of facts. We find nothing for our consideration; The indictment and all matters of procedure appear regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Fluorescent Ballat^ Waif

Commerciallindustrial D istribution

Manufacturers

Contrmictors

Large Company: New Construction

Routine Maintenance Tenant Improvement

Te

nant Improvement Retrofit (Conversion)

Routine Maintenance

(K d User

Retrofit ( v rJon)

Routine

°MM

EE-RM-97-500 COMMENT 21MM

20 AA /1/1 

Fluorescent Ballast Market I V /1 III 

Commercial/Industrial Distribution Channels 

lumlnaire· 

Manufacturers 

large Company: 

Routine Maintenanse 

Tenant Improvement 

New Construction 

Tenant Improvement 

Retrofit (Conversion) 

Routine Maintenance 

lighting 

Management 

Compani" 

End U.er 

Retrofit (Conv ..... on) 

Routine Maintenance
EXHIBIT 24.1
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                        COMMUNICATIONS INSTRUMENTS, INC.

          KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose name appears
below constitutes and appoints Ramzi A. Dabbagh and Richard Heggelund and each
of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for and in his name, place and stead, in any
and all capacities which such person serves or may serve with respect to
Communications Instruments, Inc., to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Communications Instruments, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998,
and any or all amendments to such Annual Report, and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or heir or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to
by virtue hereof.

This power of attorney has been signed as of the 29th day of March, 1998, by the
following persons.

/s/ Ramzi A. Dabbagh                      /s/ Richard Heggelund
--------------------------------------    -------------------------------------
Ramzi A. Dabbagh,                          Richard Heggelund,
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive     Chief Financial Officer
Officer and Director


/s/ Michael A. Steinbeck                  /s/ G. Daniel Taylor
--------------------------------------    -------------------------------------
Michael A. Steinbeck,                     G. Daniel Taylor,
Chief Operating Officer, President        Executive Vice President of Business
and Director                              Development and Director

/s/ Brian P. Simmons                      /s/ Andrew W. Code
--------------------------------------    -------------------------------------
Brian P. Simmons,                         Andrew W. Code,
Director                                  Director

/s/ Steven R. Brown                       /s/ Jon S. Vesely
--------------------------------------    -------------------------------------
Steven R. Brown,                          Jon S. Vesely,
Director                                  Director

/s/ Donald Dangott
--------------------------------------
Donald Dangott,
Director