65270 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 1, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

tag is received by the transmission

provider.

Standard 7.7: The 0–NX designation in the

tag assigns as transmission customer, for

all NHM Service path segments in the

transaction, the PSE that is designated as

the Purchasing-Selling Entity (PSE)

responsible for the tag. A PSE submitting

a tag may not designate a NHM Service

reservation for another PSE and a

transmission provider may not assign a

reservation to any transmission customer

other than the PSE submitting the NHM

Service tag.

Standard 7.8: When evaluating competing

requests for transmission reservations, a

transmission provider offering NHM

Service shall consider the NHM Service

to have a priority lower than Tier 5—

point-to-point service over secondary

receipt and delivery points.

Standard 7.9: Once a tag goes to

IMPLEMENT or CONDITIONAL status in

ETAG, the transmission provider shall

consider the associated NHM Service

reservations to be confirmed. Since the

NHM Service confirmed reservation(s)

are by definition less than one hour prior

to start, these reservations shall not be

displaced by a subsequent non-firm

reservation of higher priority.

Standard 7.10: The transmission customer

shall be obligated to pay for the

transmission service under the terms of

the tariff at the posted offer price for

non-firm hourly service, once the

interchange transaction tag is changed to

the IMPLEMENT or CONDITIONAL

status in ETAG. In the event of a

voluntary withdrawal or reduction in the

amount or duration of the service by the

transmission customer after the tag has

changed to IMPLEMENT or

CONDITIONAL, the transmission

customer shall remain obligated to pay

for the full amount of the approved

request. In the event of an involuntary

curtailment or reduction of the service,

initiated by the transmission provider or

any other transmission provider, the

transmission customer shall not be

obligated to pay for any portions of the

NHM Service that were involuntarily

curtailed. In the case of involuntary

curtailment or reduction, payment shall

be based on a calculation of the

MWhours actually used.

Standard 7.11: In the case that a

transaction uses NHM Service for all

required path segments in the tag, the

default condition of the tag is NOT

approved unless all required

transmission providers and control areas

indicate tag approval.

Standard 7.12: In the case that a

transaction mixes one or more

transaction path segments that use NHM

Service with one or more path segments

that use other types of transmission

service, then: (1) As long as the NHM

Service path segment(s) are not fully

approved, then the tag shall default to

NOT approved; and (2) if all NHM

Service path segments in the ETAG are

fully approved, then the tag shall revert

to the normal default status as specified

in NERC Operating Policy 3 and

associated Appendices.

Standard 7.13: The transmission customer

shall be required to submit a NHM

Service transaction request prior to the

tag submittal time limit as specified in

NERC Operating Policy 3 and associated

Appendices, and no earlier than 60

minutes prior to the start of the

transaction.

Standard 7.14: The approval mechanism

for a NHM Service reservation shall be

the tag approval. If the tag is approved

and moved to the IMPLEMENT or

CONDITIONAL state, all required NHM

Service transmission reservations

associated with that tag shall be

considered confirmed reservations. If

one or more transmission providers do

NOT approve their segment(s) of the

transaction, then the transaction shall be

considered NOT approved. Each

transmission provider designated in a tag

that does not approve that segment of the

tag shall indicate that the associated

reservation for that segment is REFUSED.

If a designated transmission provider in

a NHM Service path segment approves

the tag but the tag is not approved

through the action or inaction of another

transmission provider, then that

transmission provider shall indicate that

reservation is ANNULLED.

Standard 7.15: The transmission provider

shall assign the reservation request and

final disposition status on behalf of the

transmission customer within one hour

of the requested start of the NHM Service

transaction, regardless of the ultimate

disposition of the tag.

Standard 7.16: NHM Service shall have the

lowest curtailment priority in the event

that a curtailment or reduction of

transfers is initiated. Specifically, NHM

Service (0–NX) shall have a NERC

Curtailment Priority of 0.

[FR Doc. 00–27993 Filed 10–31–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 558

New Animal Drugs for Use in Animal

Feeds; Narasin and Tylosin Phosphate

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,

HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug

Administration (FDA) is amending the

animal drug regulations to reflect

approval of a new animal drug

application (NADA) filed by Elanco

Animal Health. The NADA provides for

use of approved, single-ingredient

narasin and tylosin phosphate Type A

medicated articles to make two-way

combination Type C medicated feeds

used as an aid in the prevention of

coccidiosis, for increased rate of weight

gain, and improved feed efficiency in

broiler chickens.

DATES: This rule is effective November

1, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Charles J. Andres, Center for Veterinary

Medicine (HFV–128), Food and Drug

Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,

Rockville, MD 20855, 301–827–1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Elanco

Animal Health, A Division of Eli Lilly

& Co., Lilly Corporate Center,

Indianapolis, IN 46285, filed NADA

141–170 that provides for use of

MONTEBAN (36, 45, 54, 72, or 90

grams per pound (g/lb) narasin activity)

and TYLAN (10 g/lb of tylosin

phosphate) Type A medicated articles to

make combination Type C medicated

broiler chicken feeds. The combination

Type C medicated feeds contain 54 to 72

g/ton narasin and 4 to 50 g/ton tylosin

phosphate and are used for the

prevention of coccidiosis caused by

Eimeria necatrix, E. tenella, E.

acervulina, E. brunetti, E. mivati, and E.

maxima, increased rate of weight gain,

and improved feed efficiency in broiler

chickens. The NADA is approved as of

September 20, 2000, and the regulations

in §§ 558.363 and 558.625 (21 CFR

558.363 and 558.625) are amended to

reflect the approval. The basis of

approval is discussed in the freedom of

information summary.

In accordance with the freedom of

information provisions of 21 CFR part

20 and 514.11(e)(2)(ii), a summary of

safety and effectiveness data and

information submitted to support

approval of this application may be seen

in the Dockets Management Branch

(HFA–305), Food and Drug

Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.

1061, Rockville, MD 20852, between 9

a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through

Friday.

The agency has determined under 21

CFR 25.33(a)(2) that this action is of a

type that does not individually or

cumulatively have a significant effect on

the human environment. Therefore,

neither an environmental assessment

nor an environmental impact statement

is required.

This rule does not meet the definition

of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because

it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’

Therefore, it is not subject to the

congressional review requirements in 5

U.S.C. 801–808.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 558

Animal drugs, Animal feeds.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 1, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 65271

Therefore, under the Federal Food,

Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under

authority delegated to the Commissioner

of Food and Drugs and redelegated to

the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21

CFR part 558 is amended as follows:

PART 558—NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR

USE IN ANIMAL FEEDS

1. The authority citation for 21 CFR

part 558 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b, 371.

2. Section 558.363 is amended in

paragraph (d)(1) by adding paragraph

(d)(1)(xi) to read as follows:

§ 558.363 Narasin.

* * * * *

(d) * * *

(1) * * *

(xi) Amount per ton. Narasin, 54 to 72

grams, plus tylosin, 4 to 50 grams.

(A) Indications for use. As an aid in

the prevention of coccidiosis caused by

Eimeria necatrix, E. tenella, E.

acervulina, E. brunetti, E. mivati, and E.

maxima, for increased rate of weight

gain, and improved feed efficiency.

(B) Limitations. For broiler chickens

only. Feed continuously as sole ration.

Do not allow adult turkeys, horses, or

other equines access to formulations

containing narasin. Ingestion of narasin

by these species has been fatal. Narasin

sodium and tylosin phosphate as

provided by 000986 in § 510.600(c) of

this chapter.

* * * * *

3. Section 558.625 is amended by

revising paragraph (f)(2) to read as

follows:

§ 558.625 Tylosin.

* * * * *

(f) * * *

(2) Tylosin may also be used in

combination with:

(i) Hygromycin B as in § 558.274.

(ii) Melengestrol acetate alone or in

combination with certain ionophores as

in § 558.342.

(iii) Monensin as in § 558.355.

(iv) Narasin as in § 558.363.

(v) Pyrantel tartrate as in § 558.485.

Dated: October 16, 2000.

Stephen F. Sundlof,

Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.

[FR Doc. 00–27967 Filed 10–31–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160–01–F

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[FRL–6893–3]

National Oil and Hazardous

Substances Pollution Contingency

Plan; National Priorities List Update

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of deletion of the

Publicker Industries Inc. Superfund Site

from the National Priorities List (NPL).

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) announces the deletion of

the Publicker Industries Inc. Superfund

Site (Site) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

from the National Priorities List (NPL).

The NPL constitutes Appendix B of 40

CFR Part 300 which is the National Oil

and Hazardous Substances Pollution

Contingency Plan (NCP), which EPA

promulgated pursuant to section 105 of

the Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation, and Liability

Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended.

EPA and the Commonwealth of

Pennsylvania, through the Pennsylvania

Department of Environmental

Protection, have determined that the

remedial action for the Site has been

successfully implemented under

CERCLA. For this Site, the selected

remedy is protective of human health

and the environment as long as the

property is used only for industrial

purposes.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 1, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Comprehensive information

on this Site is available for viewing at

the repository at the following location:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Region III, Regional Center for

Environmental Information, 1650 Arch

Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

19103. Telephone (215) 814–5254.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kristine Matzko(3HS21), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region III, 1650 Arch Street,

Philadelphia, PA 19103. Telephone

215–814–5719.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The site to

be deleted from the NPL is: Publicker

Industries Inc. Superfund Site.

EPA published a Notice of Intent to

Delete (NOID) the Publicker Industries

Inc. Superfund Site from the NPL on

July 20, 2000 in the Federal Register (65

FR 45013). The closing date for

comments on the NOID was August 21,

2000. EPA did not receive any

comments on the proposed deletion.

Therefore, no responsiveness summary

is necessary for attachment to this

Notice of Deletion.

EPA identifies sites that appear to

present a significant risk to public

health, welfare, or the environment and

it maintains the NPL as the list of these

sites. As described in § 300.425(e)(3) of

the NCP, sites deleted from the NPL

remain eligible for remedial actions in

the unlikely event that future conditions

at the site warrant such action.

Deletion of a site from the NPL does

not affect responsible party liability or

impede EPA efforts to recover costs

associated with response efforts.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous

substances, Hazardous waste,

Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,

Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Superfund, Water

pollution control, and Water supply.

Dated: October 6, 2000.

Bradley M. Campbell,

Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA Region III.

For the reasons set out in the

preamble, 40 CFR Part 300 is amended

as follows:

PART 300—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 300

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.

9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,

1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923,

3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.

Appendix B—[Amended]

2. Table 1 of Appendix B to part 300

is amended by removing the site for

‘‘Publicker Industries Inc.,’’

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

[FR Doc. 00–27780 Filed 10–31–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00–2331; MM Docket No. 00–112; RM–

9901]

Radio Broadcasting Services; Weiser,

ID; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Correcting amendments.

SUMMARY: This document contains

corrections to the final regulations,

which were published in the Federal

Register on September 20, 2000

(65FR56799). The regulations related to