alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3522 

To authorize health insurance issuers to continue to offer for sale current 

group health insurance coverage in satisfaction of the minimum essential 

health insurance coverage requirement, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2013 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To authorize health insurance issuers to continue to offer 

for sale current group health insurance coverage in satisfaction of the minimum essential health insurance coverage requirement, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Health Care 

5 Protection Act of 2013’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3522 IH

1 SEC. 2. IF YOU LIKE YOUR GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 

2 PLAN, YOU CAN KEEP IT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any provision of 

4 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (including 

5 any amendment made by such Act or by the Health Care 

6 and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010), a health insur7 ance issuer that has in effect health insurance coverage 

8 in the group market on any date during 2013 may con9 tinue after such date to offer such coverage for sale during 

10 and after 2014 in such market outside of an Exchange 

11 established under section 1311 or 1321 of such Act (42 

12 U.S.C. 18031, 18041). 

13 (b) TREATMENT AS GRANDFATHERED HEALTH

14 PLAN IN SATISFACTION OF MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COV15 ERAGE.—Health insurance coverage described in sub16 section (a) shall be treated as a grandfathered health plan 

17 for purposes of the amendment made by section 1501(b) 

18 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
          32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Apollo Gold Corporation (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
      hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ R.
              DAVID
              RUSSELLR.
                David Russell
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer
              May
                14, 2007




/s/ MELVYN
                WILLIAMSMelvyn
                    Williams
                  Chief
                    Financial Officer and Senior Vice
                  President-Finance
                    and Corporate Development
                  May
                    14, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### ALFORD v. HUMPHREY.

No. 14266.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

Sept. 5, 1941.

McFarlane & McFarlane, of Graham, for appellant.

Fred T. Arnold, of Graham, for appellee.

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff, the appellant here, brought this suit, claiming an indebtedness of $178, in a justice court in Young County. Defendant filed a plea of privilege, seeking to transfer the case to Dallas County. Plaintiff filed a controverting affidavit, and then an amended controverting affidavit. The justice of the peace heard the plea of privilege and the case on the merits on the same day, his judgment first reciting that he overruled the plea of privilege, and noting the exception of the defendant to the ruling, and then reciting that he rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendant for the sum of $98. Defendant filed an appeal bond, reading in part as follows: “Whereas, on the 8th day of January, 1941, in the above entitled and numbered suit pending in the above named Court, at a term of said Court then in session, a final judgment was rendered by said Court in favor of E. *A.*Alford against Thomas D. Humphrey, for the sum of Ninety-eight Dollars from which said judgment the said Thomas D. Humphrey has appealed to the County Court of Young County, Texas, * * ** "*

Later, the County Court of Young County, in a hearing upon the plea of privilege, sustained a general demurrer to the controverting affidavit, and ordered the case transferred on the plea of privilege.

Plaintiff has appealed, urging, in part, that defendant failed to appeal from the order of the justice of the peace overruling the plea of privilege, and that, therefore, the matter of venue was not before the county court upon the appeal. Appellee has filed no brief.

The bond in this case is similar to the one in Panhandle Compress & Warehouse Co. v. Badgett, Tex.Civ.App., 80 S.W.2d 466, where it was held that the appeal bond showed that the appeal from the justice court was obviously from the judgment on the merits, and not from the order on the plea of privilege. The opinion of the court in that case contains a full discussion of the reasons and authorities supporting its. holding. We believe that the holding is. correct, and that it is applicable to the case now on appeal.

We therefore hold that the defendant did not prosecute an appeal from the interlocutory judgment of the justice court overruling his plea of privilege; that he thereby waived his plea; and that the question of venue was not properly before the county court upon the appeal which was taken-from the judgment on the merits.

It is unnecessary to discuss appellant’s-other propositions:

The judgment of the trial court transferring the case to Dallas County is reversed, and the cause is remanded to- the County Court of Young County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berthel Growth & Income Trust I (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ronald O. Brendengen, Chief Financial Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company
Planning, Inc., the Trust Advisor of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


November 12, 2008                           /s/  Ronald O. Brendengen
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Ronald O. Brendengen
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 Berthel Fisher &
                                                 Company Planning, Inc.
                                                 Trust Advisor
                                                 Berthel Growth & Income Trust I
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") of Technology Visions Group,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), I, James B. Lahey, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 20, 2003                            /s/ James B. Lahey
                                               ------------------
                                               James B. Lahey
                                               Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                             5,883
<SECURITIES>                                       1,995
<RECEIVABLES>                                      7,737
<ALLOWANCES>                                       2,962
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0
<PP&E>                                            32,946
<DEPRECIATION>                                     8,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   187,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0
<BONDS>                                          125,259
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          29,285
<OTHER-SE>                                        10,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     187,443
<SALES>                                           14,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  21,657
<CGS>                                             12,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     12,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  10,757
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   2,327
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 4,036
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    4,537
<INCOME-TAX>                                       1,775
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                2,762
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                       2,762
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .52
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**PC MALL, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of PC Mall, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Frank F. Khulusi, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely forpurposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2)          the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periodsindicated.

 

This Certification has notbeen, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.

 
| November 6, 2009   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| /s/ Frank F. Khulusi    |   |
| Frank F. Khulusi        |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Appendix table 5--Soybean oil: Supply, disappearance, and price, U.S., 1980/81-2010/11Year Supply Disappearance Pricebeginning BeginningEnding Crude,October 1 stocks Production Imports Total Domestic Exports Total stocks Decatur-------------------Million pounds -------------------- Cents/lb.1980 1,210 11,270 0 12,480 9,113 1,631 10,744 1,736 22.731981 1,736 10,979 0 12,716 9,536 2,077 11,613 1,103 18.951982 1,103 12,040 0 13,143 9,857 2,025 11,882 1,261 20.621983 1,261 10,863 0 12,124 9,579 1,824 11,403 721 30.551984 721 11,468 20 12,209 9,916 1,660 11,576 632 29.521985 632 11,617 8 12,257 10,054 1,257 11,311 947 18.021986 947 12,783 15 13,745 10,833 1,187 12,020 1,725 15.361987 1,725 12,975 194 14,893 10,927 1,874 12,801 2,092 22.671988 2,092 11,737 138 13,967 10,591 1,661 12,252 1,715 21.091989 1,715 13,004 22 14,741 12,082 1,353 13,435 1,305 22.281990 1,305 13,408 17 14,730 12,136 808 12,944 1,786 20.981991 1,786 14,345 1 16,132 12,248 1,644 13,892 2,239 19.131992 2,239 13,778 10 16,028 13,012 1,461 14,473 1,555 21.241993 1,555 13,951 68 15,574 12,940 1,531 14,471 1,103 26.961994 1,103 15,613 17 16,733 12,914 2,683 15,597 1,137 27.511995 1,137 15,240 95 16,472 13,465 992 14,457 2,015 24.701996 2,015 15,752 53 17,821 14,267 2,033 16,300 1,520 22.511997 1,520 18,143 60 19,723 15,262 3,079 18,341 1,382 25.831998 1,382 18,078 83 19,543 15,652 2,372 18,024 1,520 19.801999 1,520 17,825 83 19,427 16,059 1,375 17,434 1,993 15.592000 1,993 18,420 73 20,486 16,318 1,401 17,719 2,767 14.092001 2,767 18,898 46 21,711 16,833 2,519 19,352 2,359 16.462002 2,359 18,430 46 20,835 17,081 2,263 19,344 1,491 22.0420031,49117,08030618,87716,86693617,8021,07629.9732Oil Crops Yearbook/OCS-2011/March 2011Economic Research Service, USDA20031,49117,08030618,87716,86693617,8021,07629.972004 1,076 19,360 26 20,462 17,439 1,324 18,763 1,699 23.012005 1,699 20,387 35 22,122 17,959 1,153 19,112 3,010 23.412006 3,010 20,489 37 23,536 18,574 1,877 20,451 3,085 31.022007 3,085 20,580 65 23,730 18,335 2,911 21,246 2,485 52.032008 2,485 18,745 90 21,319 16,265 2,193 18,459 2,861 32.162009 2,861 19,614 103 22,577 15,862 3,357 19,219 3,358 35.952010 3,358 19,035 115 22,508 17,100 3,000 20,100 2,408 51.5-55.51/ Forecast.Sources:National Monthly Feedstuff Prices, Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA and Global Agricultural Trade System, Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA andOilseed Crushings, U.S. Census Bureau.32Oil Crops Yearbook/OCS-2011/March 2011Economic Research Service, USDA
Exhibit 32(a)

              SECTION 1350 Certification (Chief Executive Officer)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Financial Corporation, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I Michael C. Gerald,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the Report.

This Certification is provided as of February 11, 2004.


                                               /s/ Michael C. Gerald
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Michael C. Gerald
                                               President/Chief Executive Officer


                                       27
Deloitte & Touche LLP


Independent Accountant's Report


Companion Servicing Company, L.L.C.:

We have examined management's assertion about Companion Servicing Company's (the
Company's) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 1998, included
in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 1998 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 26, 1999

<PAGE>

                      Companion Servicing Company, L.L.C.


As of and for the year ended December 31, 1998, Companion Servicing Company,
L.L.C. has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period,
Companion Servicing Company, L.L.C. had in effect a fidelity bond errors and
omissions policy in the amount of $1,500,000.00.


                                        /s/ Dan Starowicz
                                   -------------------------------------------
                                   Dan Starowicz
                                   Vice President


                                        3-26-99
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   Date:  March 26, 1999


                                        /s/ Randy McCurry
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   Randy McCurry
                                   V.P. Chief Financial Officer


                                        3-26-99
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   Date:  March 26, 1999
Sunoco Partners LLC Independent Director Compensation Sheet for 2006



 Exhibit 10.16 
  
 Sunoco Partners LLC 
 Independent Director Compensation Summary Sheet 
 for 2006 
  
 Directors who are employees of Sunoco Partners LLC or its affiliates receive
no additional compensation for service on the general partner’s board of directors or any committees of the board. The table below summarizes the 2006 compensation program for independent directors of Sunoco Partners LLC 
  
 2006 INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY 
  

							
	 Component

	  	 Amount
 ($)

	  	Medium of Payment

	  	Timing of Payment


				
	 Annual Retainer
	  	17,500 per year	  	Restricted Units	  	$4,375 credited quarterly1
				
	 	  	17,500 per year	  	Cash	  	$4,375 paid quarterly
				
	 Board Meeting Fee
	  	  1,500 per meeting	  	Cash	  	            Paid quarterly
				
	 Committee Meeting Fee
	  	  1,000 per meeting	  	Cash	  	            Paid quarterly
				
	 Compensation Committee Chair Retainer
	  	  2,500 per year	  	Cash	  	$   625 paid quarterly
				
	 Audit/Conflicts Committee Chair Retainer
	  	  6,500 per year	  	Cash	  	$1,625 paid quarterly

  
 NOTE TO TABLE: 
  

	 	1.	The fair market value of each quarterly payment of Restricted Units is calculated as of the payment date. The portion of the annual retainer paid in the form of Restricted Units is
required to be deferred, and is credited to each independent director’s account in the Sunoco Partners LLC Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. 

  
 In addition to the foregoing, each independent director is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses in connection with
attending meetings of the board of directors or committees. 
  
 DIRECTORS’ DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN: 
  
 In addition to the mandatory deferral of the Restricted Unit portion of the annual retainer, the Sunoco Partners LLC Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan also permits directors to voluntarily defer all or a portion of their cash
compensation. Voluntarily deferred amounts are credited in the form of Restricted Units, the value of which varies as though invested in Common Units of Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”). All amounts deferred in the form
of Restricted Units are credited with Distribution Equivalent Rights (in the form of additional Restricted Units), credited on the applicable date for the quarterly payment of Partnership cash distributions. Payments of compensation deferred under
the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan are restricted in terms of the earliest and latest dates that payments may begin. All deferrals, whether mandatory or voluntary, will be paid out in cash.