alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A), AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, George F. Horner III, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Vicuron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the Registrant);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants
fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                                                           
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2004 |  | /s/    GEORGE F. HORNER III                               
|                     |  | George F. Horner III President and Chief
Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3477 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3477

 To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide support to 
   university law school programs that are designed to provide legal 
            assistance to veterans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2013

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide support to 
   university law school programs that are designed to provide legal 
            assistance to veterans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Legal Support Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS SUPPORT FOR UNIVERSITY LEGAL 
              CLINICS THAT ASSIST VETERANS.

    (a) Support Authorized.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may 
provide support to one or more university law school programs that are 
designed to provide legal assistance to veterans.
    (b) Eligible Programs.--Programs of university law schools which 
may receive support under subsection (a) may include programs that 
assist veterans with--
            (1) filing and appealing claims for benefits under laws 
        administered by the Secretary; and
            (2) such other civil, criminal, and family legal matters as 
        the Secretary considers appropriate.
    (c) Financial Support.--
            (1) In general.--The support provided a program under 
        subsection (a) may include financial support of the program.
            (2) Limitation on amount.--The total amount of financial 
        support provided under subsection (a) in any fiscal year may 
        not exceed $1,000,000.
            (3) Funding.--Amounts for financial support under 
        subsection (a) shall be derived from amounts appropriated or 
        otherwise made available to the Medical Services account of the 
        Department of Veterans Affairs.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Stratus Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge:





(1) This
Report on Form 10-K for the ear ended December 31, 2008 (“Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:  April
      30, 2009/s/
      Paul FellerName:
      Paul FellerTitle:     Chief
      Executive Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

August 13, 2010

Mr. Reagan W. Simpson

King & Spalding LLP

401 Congress Ave. Suite 3200

Austin, TX 78701

Ms. Diana L. Faust

Cooper & Scully, P.C.

900 Jackson Street, Suite 100

Dallas, TX 75202

RE:Case Number:  10-0582

Court of Appeals Number:  05-07-00845-CV

Trial Court Number:  07-05675

Style:THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER AT DALLAS

v.

LARRY M. GENTILELLO, M.D.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas granted the motion for extension of time to file petition for review under Tex. R. App. P. 53.7(f) in the above-referenced case.  The petition for review is due to be filed no later than **September 22, 2010**.  The Emergency Motion to Enforce Statutory Stay and Vacate Court of Appeals’ Order is granted in part and issued the enclosed stay order.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 10-0582Page 1**
SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 

court's discretion to grant probation or diversion, NRS 176A.100(1)(c); 

NRS 176A.290(1); NRS 458.320(2), and Harpe fails to demonstrate that 

the district court abused its discretion by declining to do so here, see Houk 

v. State,103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

A6.-A A- ,s2N ,J. 

Hardesty 

cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge 

Steven L. Sexton 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

MEMM
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51520 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE REYES OVALLE-CHAVEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-376-ALL Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appeali ng the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Reyes Ovalle-Chavez raises arguments that areforeclosed by Almendarez-Torresv. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. U nited Statesv. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-51520

2 Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and thejudgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 99-2**

 

I, Jon Swets, Chief Financial Officer of Macatawa Bank Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)        the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 

(2)        the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Macatawa Bank Corporation. 

 

Dated: March 20, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 28, 1997,
CONTAINED IN THE SECOND QUARTER 1997 FORM 10-Q REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                           8,901
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,791
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     74,356
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               153,891
<PP&E>                                         161,896
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 841,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          152,134
<BONDS>                                        128,452
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     343,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   841,475
<SALES>                                        432,635
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               432,635
<CGS>                                          350,104
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  350,104
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,148
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,391
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       417
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,425)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,425)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.97)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

ESSEX PORTFOLIO, L.P.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this annual report of Essex Portfolio, L.P.
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2003 (the"Report"), I, Keith R. Guericke, Chief Executive Officer of Essex
Property Trust, Inc., the general partner of the registrant Essex Portfolio, L.P.,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.







Date: March 12, 2004

/s/ Keith R. GuerickeKeith R. Guericke
Chief Executive Officer

---
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-10-088-CR

ALAN LESLIE BALDERAMOS 						APPELLANT

A/K/A ALAN BALDERAMOS	

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	On December 3, 2009, the trial court sentenced appellant to ten years’ confinement after adjudicating him guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon upon his open plea of “true, but.”  In a letter postmarked February 1, 2010 and received by the trial court February 26, 2010, appellant stated, “I am acting as my own attorney ‘pro-se’ and filing an appeal on cause #1090421D.”2  He also asked for a copy of the appellate record.  Appellant had not filed a motion for new trial.

	On March 10, 2010, this court informed appellant of its concern that it does not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1), 26.3.  Appellant responded with a letter in which he contended that he mailed copies of a notice of appeal to this court, the trial court, and the district attorney’s office; he attached a “carbon copy” of the notice of appeal he claims to have mailed.  The certificate of service reads as follows:

		I Alan Balderamos do hereby certify that the true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Notice of Appeal has been forwarded by United States Mail, postage prepaid first class to Thomas A. Wilder and to the D.A. Joe Shannon[3] this 7th day of December 2009.

There is no date stamp from the district clerk’s office on the attached notice, nor is there any other proof of mailing.

	Neither this court nor the district clerk’s office has a record of receiving the notice of appeal appellant claims to have mailed on December 7, 2009, which would have been timely if it had been mailed and received in accordance with rule 9.2(b).  Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b); Villarreal v. State, 199 S.W.3d 30, 31–32 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2006, order).  However, we cannot deem the attached notice of appeal timely filed under rule 9.2(b) because even if it was properly mailed, it was not received within ten days of mailing.  Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b)(1); see In re S.A.B., No. 12-03-00151-CV, 2003 WL 21500332, at *2 (Tex. App.—Tyler Jun. 30, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (citing Stokes v. Aberdeen Ins. Co., 917 S.W.2d 267, 268 (Tex. 1996)).

	Accordingly, we must dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.4  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a), 43.2(f); Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1998).5	

							PER CURIAM

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  April 29, 2010
EXHIBIT 23



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-53593, File No.
333-53595, File No. 333-94207, File No. 333-85288, File No. 333-88572 and File No. 333-88574) of our report dated January 24, 2003, on our audit of the Macatawa Bank Corporation consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and
for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



|                       |  |  |  | 
|---------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                      
|Grand Rapids, Michigan |  |  |  | 
|March 19, 2003         |  |  |  |
#### F. M. PICKLESIMER, Jr., Appellant, v. PHELPS ROOFING COMPANY, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 17, 1954.

Raymond B. Murphy, Lexington, for appellant.

George R. Smith, W. Rodes Clay, Walter Tackett, Lexington, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant sued the appellee for $3,000. The appellee counterclaimed for $346. The court found that the appellant was entitled to $280 on his claim, and the appellee was entitled to $346 on his counterclaim, resulting in a net judgment for the appellee' in the amount of $66.

On this appeal, the appellant contends he should have been awarded $1,281 on his claim, and the appellee should have recovered nothing on his counterclaim. The amount in controversy, therefore, is $1,627.

Notwithstanding that the amount in controversy is less than $2,500, there is no motion for an appeal, and the statement of appeal recites that the appeal is *not*prosecuted under KRS 21.080.

Reserving the question of jurisdiction, we have examined the record, and we find no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant. Accordingly, the appeal is denied and the judgment will stand affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,450
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,950)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 18, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00404

- CR

Maxwell Lynn JORDAN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR1752

Hono rable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s court

- appointed attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 368 U.S. 738 (1967). This court previously issued an order setting a deadline for appellant to file a pro se brief if appellant desired to file such a brief. On October 15, 2018 , appellant filed a motion requesting a ccess to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State

, 436 S.W.3d 313

, 320

– 21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)

. Appellant’s motion to access the record is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that

t he district clerk of Bexar County shall prepare and send a full and complete duplicate copy of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record for cau se number 2015CR1752 to: Maxwell Jordan TDCJ# 02202071, c/o Garza East Unit, 4304 Hwy. 202, Beeville, Texas 78102 . It is FURTHER ORDERED that the district clerk file written notice in this court no later than ten days from the date of this order confirming the date the record was sent to appellant.

If

, after reviewing the record, appellant desires to file a pro se appellate brief , he must do so within thirty days from the date this court receives written notice that the record was sent to appellant by the district clerk

. Appellant is advised that as a pro se litigant representing himself on appeal, he will be “held to the same standards as licensed attorneys and must comply with applicable laws and rules of procedure.” Shull v. United Parcel Serv. , 4 S.W.3 d 46, 52

– 53 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1999, pet. denied).

If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty days after the date the appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court._________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of October, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court