Willie Lee HavMmeri vs Methodist Hospital of Dallas (MHS) Case No. 3:22-cv-00594-E-BT

Wrongful Termination due to Retaliation and Discrimination

Case No. 3:22-cv-00594-E-BT

Motion for Miscellaneous Relief 

Supporting Document

U.S. District Court 

Northern District of Texas (Dallas) 

Willie Lee HavMmeri,

Plaintiff

vs.

Methodist Health Systems,

Defendant

Case No. 3:22-cv-00594-E-BT

Assigned Judge: Ada Brown

Magistrate Judge: Rebecca Rutherford

Defendant’s Legal Team: Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC

(Employment Law Firm – Dallas, Texas)

Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Employment

Date Filed: 03/14/2022

Today’s Date: 05/17/2023

Overview

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, nearly 97% of Civil Case in the U.S. District Court level get 

dismissed and never make it to trial... This is due to settlements and outright Judge Dismissal. I wish to 

be found in the 3% of cases that move toward Trial. I continue to humbly ask for Injunctive Relief in the 

interim. 

Talks of Settlement. 

I’ve contacted the Defendant several times over the past three years (3) to avoid trial and to cease 

Judicial involvement on this matter but they have been reluctant to settle these matters peacefully, 

amicably and with discretion. While I am confident in my Facts, I wish to settle just so I can move on 

with my life and have a clear name/conscious on the matters I’ve carried into my 40s. 

Deny Dismissal – Let us please move FORWARD

I do not wish for my case to be dismissed. If only 3% are to go forward, I wonder what are the 

percentages on cases to which the plaintiff does not have legal representation. Nonetheless, I wish for 

my case to move forward and be found in that 3%. 

As a person wronged by an employer, the only institutions we can rely on for justice are these very legal 

proceedings. To receive justice from the TWC (Texas Workforce Commission) and a total apathy to the 

facts from the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission), I have noticed that these 

government institutions that are in place to help “the little guys” get justice really make it as difficult as 

possible. 

Case 3:22-cv-00594-E-BT Document 71 Filed 05/17/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID 291
Willie Lee HavMmeri vs Methodist Hospital of Dallas (MHS) Case No. 3:22-cv-00594-E-BT

Wrongful Termination due to Retaliation and Discrimination

Case No. 3:22-cv-00594-E-BT

I simply wish for my case to move forward. If I fall on my face in a trial, so be it. I gave it my best. If my 

case is dismissed before I receive justice, what does that say about Justice? Is justice reserved simply for 

the Rich/Affluent to enjoy? 

Motion for Miscellaneous Relief in the form of Injunctive Relief

Back wages while this matter moves forward would put me in a position to hire a professional for these 

proceedings, which the Defendant does not want to happen (despite being so annoyed with my 

documents that they demand me to be silent). 

The Defendant’s “response” to my Motion for Miscellaneous Relief came with no objections. There only 

argument was that I keep asking for relief and they need the Court to Order me silent. The Motion was 

filed 15 days ago. I would like for our Judge to decide on the matter, as I have mentioned, my growing 

damages are irreparable and I am in need of Injunction. 

Conclusion

I graciously await The Court’s rulings on the Motion to Dismiss and the Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. 

I ask that I be found in the 3% of cases set for Scheduling Order and Trial.

I graciously await the Discovery/Disclosure stages, where all the truth shall be revealed. 

I graciously await Settlement/Trial.

I graciously await moving on with my life. 

My termination was WRONGFUL. It was RETALIATION for questioning an unfair bias, due to GENDER.

I am more than a name in the PLAINTIFF section of documents. 

Respectfully submitted, 

May 17th, 2023 

By: _____/s/ Willie HavMmeri_________

Willie Lee HavMmeri, self-represented “Pro se”

godcolored@gmail.com

(214) 600-6207

Case 3:22-cv-00594-E-BT Document 71 Filed 05/17/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID 292