alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
APRIL TERM, 1718.

#### John Tanner *against*Robert Freeland, Administrator of Ball.

*T. Mamemara,*for appellant.

*T. Bordley*and Hunt, for appellee.

THIS was an appeal from *Calvert*County Court on a *scire facias*brought against Freeland,, as administrator of *Ball,*to have execution of a judgment against the intestate. He pleaded *plene administravit*generally. Replication and the Jury find for the defendant. Error. Because *plene administravit*generally is no bar on a *scire facias,*to have execution on a judgment. *Cro. Eliz. 575. 5 Co.*28. 4 Co. 59 *b. 2 Brown.*39.81,82. 2 *Leon.*370. 1 *Leon.*328.

Judgment affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 PC MALL, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the
periods indicated.
  May 15, 2007/s/ Frank F. Khulusi

Frank F. KhulusiChief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27592]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service (MMS)


Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Scientific Committee (SC) of the 
Minerals Management Advisory Board; Announcement of Plenary Session

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

SUMMARY: The Minerals Management Advisory Board OCS SC will meet at the 
Chateau Sonesta Hotel in New Orleans, Louisiana, November 28-30, 2000.
    The OCS SC is an outside group of scientists which advises the 
Director, MMS, on the feasibility, appropriateness, and scientific 
merit of the MMS OCS Environmental Studies Program as it relates to 
information needed for informed OCS decisionmaking.
    The Committee will meet in plenary session on Tuesday, November 28, 
from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., and meet in breakout sessions by discipline 
in the morning and regionally in the afternoon of November 29. The 
plenary session will reconvene at 8 a.m. on November 30 and adjourn at 
noon.
    Discussion will focus on the following:
    <bullet> Ocean Activities Update
    <bullet> Future Plans for Sand and Gravel Program
    <bullet> Environmental Studies Program Highlights
    <bullet> Regional Updates
    The meetings are open to the public. Approximately 30 visitors can 
be accommodated on a first-come-first-served basis at the plenary 
session.
    A copy of the agenda may be requested from the MMS by calling Julie 
Reynolds at (703) 787-1211 or by electronic mail 
(<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e140b12171b500c1b071011121a0d3e13130d50191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f150a13161a510d1a061110131b0c3f12120c51181009">[email protected]</span></a>). Other inquiries concerning the OCS SC meeting 
should be addressed to Mr. Robert LaBelle, Executive Secretary to the 
OCS Scientific Committee Minerals Management Service, 381 Elden Street, 
Mail Stop 4040, Herndon, Virginia 20170-4817. He may be reached by 
telephone at (703) 787-1756, and by electronic mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#57253835322523793b3635323b3b32173a3a2479303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d9abb6bbbcabadf7b5b8bbbcb5b5bc99b4b4aaf7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>.

DATES: November 28-30, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Chateau Sonesta Hotel, 800 Iberville Street, New Orleans, 
Louisiana 70112-3143, telephone (504) 586-0800.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Reynolds or Robert LaBelle at 
the address or phone numbers listed above.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. Law 92-463, 5 
U.S.C., appendix I, and the Office of Management and Budget's 
circular A-63, Revised.

    Dated: October 19, 2000.
Thomas A. Readinger,
Associate Director for Offshore Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 00-27592 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4043-MR-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Power & Equipment Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, C. Dean McLain, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ C. Dean McLain
----------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
June 16, 2003
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 10

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101-3140

OFFICE OF 

AIR, WASTE, AND TOXICS

February 5, 2014

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Incremental Cost TASCO: LNB vs SCR

FROM: Steve Body /S/

TO: The Files

It appears that the National Park Service, in their comments on our proposed approval of 

the TASCO BART Alternative (published June 28, 2013), improperly calculated the incremental 

cost effectiveness of SCR over LNB by using the original performance of LNB in the 2010 SIP 

submittal, rather than the more stringent NOx emission limit in the 2012 SIP Submittal. The 

NPS calculation assumes a 50% control efficiency for LNB with an emission reduction of 521 

t/y from the base case of 1042 t/y annual emissions. Using the new proposed emission limit of 

147 lb/hr. the emission reduction from LNB is 632 t/y, that represents a control efficiency of 

60%. The incremental cost should have been calculated based on SCR cost and emission 

reduction, compared to the original LNB costs and new LNB performance of 147 lb/hr.

SCR annualized cost: $3,534,384

SCR emissions: 104 t/y

LNB annualized cost: $479,841

New LNB emissions: 410 t/y

Thus incremental cost effectiveness of SCR over LNB with new BART emission limit is:

-3,054,570/-306 = $9982/t
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6247

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. THOMAS MONTRIL BROWN, a/k/a Sparks , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. ( 4:05

- cr - 00770

- TLW

- 1 )

Submitted : August 18, 2022 Decided: August 30, 2022

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Thomas Montril Brown , Appellant Pro Se. Derek Alan Shoemake, Assistant U nited States Attorney , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished op inions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6247 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/30/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Thomas Montril Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown , No. 4:05

- cr - 00770

- TLW

- 1 (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 2022) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6247 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/30/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                            ACT MANUFACTURING, INC.

           Weighted Shares Used in Computation of Earnings per Share


Shares used in the net income per common share computation are the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding plus common share equivalents (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                              Quarter Ended June 30,          Six Months Ended June 30,
                              ----------------------          -------------------------
                                 1997         1996                1997          1996
                                 ----         -----               ----         -----
<S>                           <C>              <C>              <C>         <C>
                                                                         
Weighted average number of                                               
 common shares outstanding         8,881         8,757             8,850        8,735
Common share equivalents             468           254               468          232
                                   -----         -----             -----        -----
                                                                                     
TOTAL                              9,349         9,011             9,318        8,967
                                   =====         =====             =====        ===== 
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>                                                           5 

        
<S>                                                   <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                                            JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                              JUN-30-1998 
<CASH>                                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                6,270 
<PP&E>                                                         68,863 
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 46,295 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 22,568 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1,849,629 
<BONDS>                                                             0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                                         0 
<COMMON>                                                       15,710
<OTHER-SE>                                                  8,936,133 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   28,838 
<SALES>                                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    0 
<CGS>                                                               0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              129,055     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             48,472     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0 
<CHANGES>                                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                        0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   (0.01) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0 

         

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             753
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,338
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,568
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,118
<PP&E>                                             485
<DEPRECIATION>                                     201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,672
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,483
<SALES>                                         79,328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,328
<CGS>                                           79,656
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,104
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 264
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,669)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,669)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,669)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23. CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Nos. 333-115672, 333-45249 and 333-45251) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-114730) of Getty Realty Corp.of our report dated March 17, 2008 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders,which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation byreference of our report dated March 17, 2008 relating to the financial statement schedules,which appears in this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPNew York, New York
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Stanadyne Corporation (Stanadyne) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), we, M. David Jones, Chief Executive Officer of Stanadyne, and Stephen S. Langin, Chief Financial Officer of
Stanadyne, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stanadyne.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ M. David Jones      |  | /s/ Stephen S. Langin  
|M. David Jones          |  | Stephen S. Langin      
|Chief Executive Officer |  | Chief Financial Officer
|April 2, 2007           |  | April 2, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 211 (Tuesday, October 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64974-64975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27887]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Amended 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Director's 
Council of Public Representatives, October 31-November 1, 2000, 
National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 31, 
Conference Room 6, Bethesda, MD 20982 which was published in the 
Federal Register on October 10, 2000, 65 FR 60200-60201.
    The dates, times, and location of the meeting are the same but the 
agenda has changed to discuss human research protections and medical 
applications research. The meeting is open to the public.


[[Page 64975]]


    Dated: October 17, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-27887 Filed 10-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-72349 and No. 333-89115) of ATG Inc. of our
report dated March 31, 2001 which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders,
which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated March 31, 2001 relating to the
financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


San Jose, California
May 3, 2001
#### L. J. TAYLOR, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee (two cases).

Nos. 25369, 25370.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 10, 1951.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 14, 1951.

Bennett & Bennett by Mac L. Bennett, Jr., Normangee, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of. Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The question herein submitted is identical with that presented in Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 243 S.W.2d 582.

For me reasons therein stated the State’s motion for rehearing is granted, the original opinion withdrawn, the judgment of reversal and dismissal is set aside, and the judgment is now affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The same proposition confronts us as is raised in Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 243 S.W.2d 582, and in conformity with our reasoning in that case, this motion for a rehearing is overruled.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of KPMG LLP

The General Partner
Essex Portfolio, L.P.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-44467) of Essex Portfolio, L.P. of
our report dated February 5, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Essex Portfolio, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002
and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners'
capital, and cash flows of Essex Portfolio, L.P. and subsidiaries for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002 and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the annual report on Form
10-K of Essex Portfolio, L.P.

/s/ KPMG LLP          
      
KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California
March 31, 2003

---
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3543 

To permanently extend the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 

and establish a private right of action to enforce compliance with such 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2013 

Mr. ELLISON (for himself, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. CICILLINE, 

Ms. CLARKE, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. 

MCDERMOTT, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. 

RANGEL, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. 

WILSON of Florida, Mr. RUSH, Mr. KILDEE, Ms. MOORE, and Mrs. 

CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To permanently extend the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 and establish a private right of 

action to enforce compliance with such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanently Pro5 tecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2013’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3543 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUNSET PROVISION. 

2 Section 704 of the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure 

3 Act of 2009 (12 U.S.C. 5201 note; 12 U.S.C. 5220 note; 

4 42 U.S.C. 1437f note) is hereby repealed. 

5 SEC. 3. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION. 

6 The Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009, 

7 as amended by section 2 of this Act, is further amended 

8 by adding at the end the following new section: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 704. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION. 

10 ‘‘(a) RIGHT OF ACTION.—Any person aggrieved by 

11 a violation referred to in subsection (b) may bring a civil 

12 action in a court of competent jurisdiction for damages 

13 resulting from such violation, and may obtain other appro14 priate relief, including equitable relief. If the plaintiff pre15 vails in any such action, the court shall award the plaintiff 

16 any litigation costs reasonably incurred, together with rea17 sonable attorneys’ fees and reasonable expert witness fees, 

18 as determined by the court. 

19 ‘‘(b) VIOLATION.—A violation referred to in this sub20 section is a violation of— 

21 ‘‘(1) section 702 of this title; or 

22 ‘‘(2) the matter in subparagraph (C) or (F) of 

23 section 8(o)(7) of the United States Housing Act of 

24 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(7)) that was added by the 

25 amendments made by section 703 of this title.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.1

                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viseon, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John Harris, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  February 14, 2003                      By       /s/ John Harris
                                              ----------------------------------
                                               Chief Executive Officer
#### A. W. KROESCHE, appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 9863.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

March 22, 1950.

Geo. H. Spencer and Theo. F. Weiss, San Antonio, Davis, Clemens, Knight & Weiss, of San Antonio, of counsel, for appellant.

Price Daniel, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Charles D. Mathews, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Willis E. Gresham, Walter F. Woodul, Jr., Edwin N. Bell, Asst. Attys. Gen., for ap-pellee.

ARCHER,' Chief Justice.

This is a companion case to Perfecto Gas Company v. State, this day decided by this court, 228 S.W.2d 918, and presents the same questions decided by us in that case. For the 'reasons stated in that opinion, which is here referred to and adopted, the judgment of the trial court in this case is affirmed.

Affirmed.