alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          7
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       10,710,754
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                               0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                 0
<EQUITIES>                                     36,112
<MORTGAGE>                                     68,477
<REAL-ESTATE>                                       0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             11,443,517
<CASH>                                      1,059,300
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                  0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                        295,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             14,563,718
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                     0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 0
<POLICY-OTHER>                             11,559,719
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                               0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                               229,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                    13,630
<COMMON>                                          285
<OTHER-SE>                                    993,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               14,563,718
<PREMIUMS>                                          0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                           593,522
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              2,823
<OTHER-INCOME>                                248,208
<BENEFITS>                                          0
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    44,440
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                          205,274
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               106,730
<INCOME-TAX>                                   35,137
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   71,593
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    2.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.40
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                      0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                 0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                  0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                    0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                     0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                             0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11

                      BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORPORATION
                           COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



                                 For the Three Months Ended March 31
                                            1999         1998	
                             (in thousands, except share information)
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net income                              $   18,490   $   17,589

Shares of Common Stock:
   Weighted average shares outstanding  65,758,524   65,618,760
   Effect of contingent shares              26,559       28,180
                                        65,785,083   65,646,940

Basic earnings per share                $      .28   $      .27


DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net income                              $   18,490   $   17,589

Shares of Common Stock:
   Weighted average shares outstanding  65,758,524   65,618,760
   Effect of contingent shares              26,559       28,180
   Effect of options                        21,028       92,535

                                        65,806,111   65,739,475

Diluted earnings per share              $      .28   $      .27
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3551 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3551

   To require the periodic inspection of certain railroad facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 20, 2013

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the periodic inspection of certain railroad facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Railway Inspection and Transparency 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INSPECTION OF RAILROAD FACILITIES.

    (a) Requirement.--The Federal Railroad Administration shall require 
each railroad carrier to arrange for an independent inspection by a 
professional engineer of--
            (1) all railroad bridges owned or leased by that railroad 
        carrier at least once every 2 years; and
            (2) all railroad signals and switches owned or leased by 
        that railroad carrier at least once every 6 months.
    (b) Documentation.--Each railroad carrier shall provide to the 
Federal Railroad Administration documentation of the results of 
inspections carried out under subsection (a). The Federal Railroad 
Administration shall make such documentation available to the public.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Independent inspection.--The term ``independent 
        inspection'' means an inspection conducted by a professional 
        engineer that is not employed by the railroad carrier or the 
        Federal Railroad Administration.
            (2) Professional engineer.--The term ``professional 
        engineer'' means an individual who--
                    (A) is currently registered as a professional 
                engineer or structural engineer by a State, the 
                District of Columbia, or a territory, commonwealth, or 
                possession of the United States; and
                    (B) has expertise in railroad operations.
            (3) Railroad carrier.--The term ``railroad carrier'' has 
        the meaning given that term in section 20102 of title 49, 
        United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GA R Y S MI T H, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. A . P. K A N E, W a r d e n ; J A M ES D A V I S, C h ai rm an , B o ardo f P aro l e H eari n g s, R esp o n d en t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 15587 D . C. N o . 0 6 - CV - 0 1 8 3 0 - CW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C l audi aA . W i l ke n, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a r c h 8, 2011 ** B efo re: F A R R IS , L E A V Y , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C alifo rn ia state p riso n erG ary S m ith ap p ea ls p ro se fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s ju d g m e n t d e n y in g h is 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 4 h ab e a s p e titio n . W e d is m is s . S m ith c o n te n d s th a t th e B o a r do f P r is o n T e rm s ’ 2 0 0 3 d e c is io n to d e n yh im



# FI LED MA R 16 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 15587 2 parol e f or fi ve ye ar s w as no tsupp ort ed by “ som e e vi dence” and there fore vi ol at ed h is du e p r o c e s s r ig h ts . A f t e rbr i e f i ng w a s c om pl e t e d i n thi s c a s e , thi s c ourthe l d tha tac e rt i f i c a t e of ap p e a lab ilityis r e q u ir e dto c h a lle n g e th e d e n ia l o f p a r o le . See H

ayw ard v. M a rs h a ll , 60 3 F . 3d 54 6, 55 4-55 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( en banc). N o w th e Sup r e me C o u rt h a s h e ldth a t th e o n lyf e d e r a l r ig h t a t is s u e in th e p a r o le c o n te x t is pr oc e dur a l , a nd the onl ypr ope ri nqui ryi s w ha tpr oc e s s the i nm a t e r e c e i ve d, not w h e th e rth e s ta te c o u rt d e c id e dth e c a s e c o rr e c tly . See Sw artho utv. C oo ke , 1 3 1 S. C t . 85 9 (20 11 ) ( per c uri am ). B ec ause S m i th rai se s no p roce du ra l chal l enges re gardi ng hi s par ol e heari ng , a c ert i fi ca t e of app ea l abi l i ty c anno ti ss ue. F urther, because S m i th h as no tm ade asubst ant i al show i ng of the deni al of a c on st i tut i on al r ig h t, w e d e c lin e to c e rtif yth e r e m a in in g c la im s . See 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 3(c) . DI S MI S S E D.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 21.1
                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

        LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF CII TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (AS OF 12/31/00)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
          Name of Entity                                     Name of Owner
          --------------                                     --------------
<S>                                                     <C>
Electro-Mech, S. A. de C. V., a corporation             CII Technologies, Inc., a
organized under the laws of Mexico                      North Carolina corporation

Kilovac Corporation, A California corporation           CII Technologies, Inc., a
                                                        North Carolina corporation

Corcom, Inc., an Illinois corporation                   CII Technologies, Inc., a
                                                        North Carolina corporation

Products Unlimited Corporation, an Iowa                 CII Technologies, Inc., a
corporation                                             North Carolina corporation

Kilovac International, Inc., a California               Kilovac Corporation, a California
corporation                                             corporation

Kilovac International FSC, Ltd., a                      Kilovac Corporation, a California
corporation organized under the laws of                 corporation
Jamaica

Corcom, S. A. de C. V., a corporation                   Corcom, Inc., an Illinois corporation
organized under the laws of Mexico

Corcom West Indies Ltd., a corporation                  Corcom, Inc., an Illinois corporation
organized under the laws of Barbados

Corcom International Ltd., a corporation                Corcom, Inc., an Illinois corporation
organized under the laws of Barbados

Corcom GmbH, a corporation organized                    Corcom, Inc., an Illinois corporation
under the laws of Germany

Products Unlimited Export, Inc., an US                  Products Unlimited Corporation, an
Virgin Islands corporation                              Iowa Corporation
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Hyperdynamics Corporation
(Hyperdynamics), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Kent P. Watts, Chief
Executive Officer of Hyperdynamics, does hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
February 17, 2009





By:
                  /s/ Kent P. WattsKent
      P. WattsChief
      Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SkillSoft Public Limited Company (the“Company”) for the period ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Thomas J. McDonald, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: December 9, 2005 /s/ Thomas J. McDonald   Thomas J. McDonald   Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT31.1**

 

**PC MALL,INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Frank F. Khulusi,certify that:

 

1.          I have reviewed thisQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PC Mall, Inc.;

 

2.   Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.   Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.          The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)         Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)        Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)         Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.          The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)         All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)        Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:November 14, 2007

 
| /s/ Frank F. Khulusi    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Frank F. Khulusi        |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster| Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov Content Last Updated: 09/30/2008 Search Help More Search Options Printable Version 

## Packaged Terminal Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Energy Conservation Standard Final Rule Analytical Spreadsheets The Department of Energy prepared the analytical spreadsheets below for the Final Rule stage of its energy conservation standards rulemaking on packaged terminal air conditioners and packaged terminal heat pumps. 

### Final Rule Analytical SpreadsheetsLife-Cycle Cost Spreadsheet ( Excel 2.1 MB )National Impact Analysis Spreadsheet ( Excel 3.7 MB )Manufacturer Impact Analysis Spreadsheet (Government Regulatory Impact Model) ( Excel 5.3 MB ) Printable Version EERE Information Center 

### Pa g e 1 of 1 A pp liances and Commercial E qui p ment Standards: Packa g ed Terminal Air Conditioners an d
...

10/3/2008 htt p ://www1.eere.ener gy . g ov/buildin g s/app liance

_ standards/commercial/ p tacs _p thp s

_ final

_ s...
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6441

PEDRO RODRIGUEZ AVILA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THEODIS BECK, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:06-cv-00387-JAB) Submitted: July 19, 2007 Decided: July 25, 2007 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pedro Rodriguez Avila, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Pedro Rodriguez Avila, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Avila has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PDI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles T. Saldarini,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.


/s/ Charles T. Saldarini
----------------------------
Charles T. Saldarini
Chief Executive Officer
March 3, 2004
#### SCHOOLEY v. STATE.

No. 22314.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 11, 1942.

F. H. Hammond and Ben L. King, both of Burnet, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $50.

The appellant has filed a written application, duly verified by his affidavit, requesting the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted and the appeal is ordered dismissed.
Request for Additional Information - London Offshore Consultants 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Riggs: 

 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-

2645). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition. 

 

• Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s) (i.e., fixed wing, rotorcraft, lighter than air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). This 

information can be located in the aircraft manual(s). 

 

Please submit the additional information (non proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any 

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you 

want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 9/24/15. If we 

do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at (202) 267-2999. 

 

Sincerely, 

 

Jake J Troutman 

Program Analyst | Rulemaking 

FAA Office of Aviation Safety 

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division 

202-267-9521 

 

Thank you for your interest in aviation safety. 

FAA Office of Rulemaking 

Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 9:02 AM 

To: m.riggs@loc-group.com 

Cc: May, Rick (FAA) 

 

Request for Additional Information - London Offshore Consultants Page 1 of 1

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&... 9/9/2015
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 145 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 145

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 14 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for an adjournment of the House from Wednesday, September 15, 
                  1993 to Tuesday, September 21, 1993.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on Wednesday, September 15, 1993, it stand 
adjourned until noon on Tuesday, September 21, 1993.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual report of LaSalle Hotel Properties (LHO) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hans S. Weger, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of LHO,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report, containing the financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LHO.




February 21, 2008







/s/    HANS S. WEGERHans S. Weger Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer