alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 8 

Ref: 8P-AR 

Todd Parfitt, Director 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

Denver, CO 80202-1129 

Phone 800-227-8917 

http://wwiN.epa.gov/region08 

JUL - 9 2014 

Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality 

Herschler Building 

122 West 251

h Street 

Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002 

RE: Completeness Determination for Wyoming's Infrastructure State Implementation Plan 

Submission for the 2010 1-Hour Nitrogen Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

(NAAQS) 

Dear Mr. Parfitt: 

On January 28,2014, the EPA received Wyoming's Infrastructure State Implementation Plan 

(iSJP) submission for the 2010 1-hour nitrogen dioxide NAAQS. We have determined that 

Wyoming's iSIP submittal is administratively and technically complete for the requirements of 

the Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 11 O(a)(2)(A), (B), (C) to the extent it refers to enforcement, to 

programs for minor sources, and to permitting programs required by CAA part C title I, (D), (E)-

(H), and (J)-(M). We are now reviewing the submission for future rulemaking action. 

If you would like to discuss this with me, I can be reached at 303-312-6298. If you require more 

specific information regarding this subject, the most knowledgeable person on my staff is Abby 

Fulton, Environmental Protection Specialist, who may be reached at 303-312-6563 or 

fulton.abby@epa.gov. I appreciate your partnership as we work together to protect public health 

and the environment. 

Sincerely, 

\j__., \ ~ 1\1----

Debra H. Thomas 

Acting Assistant Regional Administrator 

Office of Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance 

cc: Steven A. Dietrich, 

Administrator, Wyoming Air Quality Division 

® Printed on Recycled Paper
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3375 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3375

To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
   Veterans Affairs to be constructed at 3141 Centennial Boulevard, 
Colorado Springs, Colorado, as the ``PFC Floyd K. Lindstrom Department 
                     of Veterans Affairs Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 29, 2013

   Mr. Lamborn (for himself, Ms. DeGette, Mr. Polis, Mr. Tipton, Mr. 
  Gardner, Mr. Coffman, and Mr. Perlmutter) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
   Veterans Affairs to be constructed at 3141 Centennial Boulevard, 
Colorado Springs, Colorado, as the ``PFC Floyd K. Lindstrom Department 
                     of Veterans Affairs Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PFC FLOYD K. LINDSTROM DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The community-based outpatient clinic of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs to be constructed at 3141 Centennial 
Boulevard, Colorado Springs, Colorado, shall be known and designated as 
the ``PFC Floyd K. Lindstrom Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the building referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``PFC Floyd 
K. Lindstrom Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic''.
                                 <all>
```
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                           U.S. BRIDGE OF N.Y., INC.

     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet,  Statement  of  Operations,  Statements  of Cash Flows and Notes  thereto
incorporated  in Part I,  Item I of this Form  10-QSB  and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000937931
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         249,780
<SECURITIES>                                   31,554
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,158,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,851,057
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         74,584
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,365,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,269,504
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       503,652
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,592,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,365,943
<SALES>                                        3,147,941
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,147,941
<CGS>                                          2,254,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               487,432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            406,122
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0 
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   406,122
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .21
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Apollo Gold Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Llee Chapman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  ****Date: January 20, 2005
By:
/s/ R. Llee ChapmanR. Llee ChapmanChief Financial Officer
Order filed August 23, 2018 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00680-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF M.E.H.

On Appeal from the 345th District Court

Travis County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D-1-AG-15-002375

ORDER

This appeal is one of five appeals pending from the underlying suit. Those 

appeals were filed in the Third Court of Appeals and transferred to this court by 

order of the Supreme Court. The appeal numbers are: 

3rd Court of Appeals 14th Court of Appeals

03-18-00165-CV 14-18-00281-CV

03-18-00475-CV 14-18-00675-CV

03-18-00489-CV 14-18-00680-CV

03-18-00490-CV 14-18-00681-CV

03-18-00491-CV 14-18-00682-CV

This order pertains to appeal 14-18-00680-CV only.
The notice of appeal states appellant desires to appeal from the “Order to 

Revoke Suspension of Commitment signed by the Court on May 10, 2018.” No such 

order appears in the clerk’s record, which was filed August 8, 2018. 

Accordingly, we direct the Travis County District Clerk to file a supplemental 

clerk’s record by September 4, 2018, containing:

1. Motion to Revoke Suspension of Commitment, filed February 7, 2018; and

2. Order to Revoke Suspension of Commitment, signed May 10, 2018.

See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c).

If either of the requested items is not part of the case file, the district clerk is 

directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certification so stating.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 31.2  Section 302 Certification - CFO



CERTIFICATION



I, David Gillard, CFO, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Stockgroup Information Systems Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and

c)

presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correction actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:  March 9, 2004





/s/  David Gillard



David Gillard, CGA

Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65769-65770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28197]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service

19 CFR 10, 12, 18, 24, 111, 113, 114, 125, 134, 145, 162, 171, and 
172

[T.D. 00-57]
RIN 1515-AC01


Petitions for Relief: Seizures, Penalties, and Liquidated 
Damages; Correction

AGENCY: Customs Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Customs published in the Federal Register of September 5, 
2000, a document that revised the Customs Regulations relating to the 
filing of petitions in penalty, liquidated damages, and seizure cases. 
Inadvertently, Appendix C to Part 171 was incorrectly amended. This 
document corrects the amendment of that Appendix.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 2, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeremy Baskin, Penalties Branch, 
Office of Regulations and Rulings, (202) 927-2344.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On September 5, 2000, Customs published in the Federal Register (65 
FR 53565) T.D. 00-57 that revised the Customs Regulations relating to 
the filing of petitions in penalty, liquidated damages, and seizure 
cases. Parts 171 and 172 of the Customs Regulations were recrafted in 
that document to include petition processing in seizure and unsecured 
penalty cases under part 171 and liquidated damages and secured penalty 
petition processing under part 172. It has come to Customs attention 
that the amendatory instructions regarding appendix C to part 171 set 
forth in that document inadvertently failed to remove a section and a 
note in the Appendix which were

[[Page 65770]]

intended to be removed. Not removing the section resulted in the next 
section being redesignated incorrectly. Section I.H. and the note 
following section I.H. were intended to be removed, but were not, and 
section I.H. was incorrectly designated as section I.F. This document 
corrects these errors by removing section I.H. and the note following 
section I.H., and redesignating section I.I. as section I.F.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication on September 5, 2000, of the final 
rule (T.D. 00-57, 65 FR 53565) is corrected as follows:
    1. On page 53578, in the third column, the fifth amending 
instruction is revised to read as follows:

Appendix C to Part 171 [Amended]

    5. Appendix C to Part 171 is amended by removing the Note following 
section I.D., removing section I.E., redesignating section I.F. as 
section I.E., removing sections I.G. and I.H. and the NOTE following 
section I.H., and redesignating section I.I. as section I.F.

    Dated: October 30, 2000.
Stuart P. Seidel,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of Regulations and Rulings.
[FR Doc. 00-28197 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
#### ASH et al. v. STATE.

No. 23740.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 11, 1947.

No appearance for appellants.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Alvin John Ash and Carl Thomas Ash were each given two years in the penitentiary on a charge of burglary.

The statement of facts in the case is not signed by the judge and, consequently, cannot be considered.

The record does not show notice of appeal properly recorded in the minutes. Therefore we have no jurisdiction of the case. The appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-141438, File No. 333-134502, File No. 333-116914, and File No. 333-94207) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-53595) of our report dated March 30, 2010 on the consolidated balance sheet of Macatawa Bank Corporation as of December 31, 2009 and the consolidated statement of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

| | /s/ Crowe Horwath LLP
| | ---------------------

Grand Rapids, Michigan
February 24, 2011
#### WARREN v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 19, 1952.

Grant F. Knuckles and W. R. Lay, Pine-ville, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Zeib A. Stewart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

DUNCAN, Justice.

Appellant, a man forty-three years of age, was convicted and sentenced to two years in the penitentiary under an indictment charging him with the offense of attempted rape of a female under the age of twelve years. The child involved was ten years of age, and the offense is alleged to have occurred in a moving picture theater. We shall omit the name of the child and the revolting details which this record discloses.

Although appellee was indicted under KRS 435.080(2) which fixes a penalty of not less than five nor more than twenty years’ imprisonment, the jury was instructed under KRS 435.110, prescribing punishment upon conviction of not less than two nor more than seven years’ confinement in the penitentiary. Appellant was not prejudiced by the instruction, since it enabled the jury to impose a less penalty than that fixed by the. statute under which the indictment was drawn.

The only error urged in this Court is the failure of the lower court to sustain a demurrer to the indictment because of its omission of the word “felonious.” We regard the contention as unsound for two reasons.

By the 1942 amendment to Section 126 of the Criminal Code, it is provided by subsection 3 that it is not necessary for an indictment to allege that the offense was committed or the act done feloni-ously unless such characterization is necessary to charge the offense under. Section 122 of the Criminal Code.

*613In any event, and aside from the provisions of the 1942 amendment to Section 126, the indictment in this case would have been good. The use of the word “felonious” was required only in indictments charging common law felonies or in statutory felonies where the word is included in the statutory description of the offense. KRS 435.080(1), which was formerly Section 1152, Carroll’s Kentucky Statutes, prescribing the punishment for rape upon a child under twelve years of age, is a common law felony since it merely provides a penalty and resort must be had to the common law for a description of the offense. Wilkey v. Commonwealth, 104 Ky. 325, 47 S.W. 219; Green v. Commonwealth, 268 Ky. 475, 105 S.W.2d 585. Attempted rape was not a felony at common law, and the offense created by KRS 435.080(2), formerly Section 1153 of Carroll’s Kentucky Statutes, is strictly a statutory felony. The word “felonious” not being used in the statute as characterizing the offense, its use in the indictment is unnecessary.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### The John Weenink & Sons Co., Appellant, *v.*Orlando et al., Appellees.

(No. 28141

Decided May 15, 1940.)

*Mr. Arthur P. Gustafson,*for appellant.

*Mr. Franh Morton,*for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2189** 
DAYYAN ATTA BEY EX REL DERICK SEALEY, an individual , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. MICHAELA BASS, an individual , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News
. Mark S. Davis , District Judge. ( 4:15

- cv - 00091

- MSD

- LRL )

Submitted : March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Dayyan Atta Bey ex rel Derick Sealey , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dayyan Atta Bey appeals the dist rict court ’ s order dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012)
. In his complaint , Bey sought relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) , and other causes of action
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bey v. Bass , No. 4:15

- cv 00091

- MSD

- LRL (E.D. Va. Sept. 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and a rgument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-53593, File No. 333-53595 and File No. 333-94207) of our
report dated January 24, 2001, on our audit of the consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and for the years ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.

                              /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Grand Rapids, Michigan        Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
March 8, 2001
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65868-65869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28115]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: December 4, 2000.
    Time: 12:00 pm to 1:30 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Neuroscience Center, National Institutes of Health, 6001 
Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone conference Call).
    Contact Person: Mary Sue Krause, MED, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National 
Institutes of Health, NIH Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Room 6138, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-6470.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: December 8, 2000.
    Time: 1:30 pm to 3:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Neuroscience Center National Institutes of Health, 6001 
Executive Blvd.,

[[Page 65869]]

Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Gayathri Jeyarasasingam, PHD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National 
Institutes of Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive 
Blvd., Room 6150, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-443-1340.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 24, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-28115 Filed 11-01-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M