alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             253
<SECURITIES>                                       800
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,349<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,394
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,050
<PP&E>                                             346<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,726
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              198
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,093
<SALES>                                          9,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,964
<CGS>                                            8,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,029
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    60
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (251)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (251)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
<FN>
<F1>Amounts reported for Accounts Receivable and Property Plant & Equip are net
amount.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
STATE OF TENNESSEE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 

May 14, 2015 

Ms. Heather McTeer Toney 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA, Region IV 

DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL 

WILLIAM R. SNODGRASS TENNESSEE TOWER 

312 ROSA L. PARKS AVENUE, 15TH FLOOR 

NASHVILLE, TN 37243 

Atlanta Federal Center, 12th Floor 

61 Forsyth Street, S.W. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

Subject: Request to incorporate a rev1s1on to the Knox County Air Quality Management 

Regulations into the Federally Approved SIP for Tennessee 

Dear Administrator Toney: 

The Tennessee Division of Air Pollution Control received a request from the Knox County 

Department of Air Quality Management to incorporate into the State Implementation Plan and 

submit to EPA, a revision to the Knox County Air Quality Management Regulations portion of 

the SIP. The requested revision amends Section 25.6 of the Knox County Air Quality 

Management Department's regulations. 

Specifically, the revision to Section 26.5.C changes the date of submission by facilities to meet 

the requirement of the CAA 182(a)(3)(B). This rule requires the submittal of an annual emission 

statement from sources that emit 25 tons per year or more of nitrogen oxides or volatile organic 

compounds. This revision revises the submission date from July 15 to March 31 in order to 

align with the rules of the State of Tennessee. 

This revision to the Knox County portion of the SIP was approved by the State Air Pollution 

Control Board on May 13th, 2015. A copy of the Board Order (15-004) is attached. 

Your prompt consideration of this request is appreciated. If you need further information or 

documentation, please contact Marc Corrigan at (615) 532-0616. 

Sincerely, 

r!:tt!1!t.i7) Technical Secretary 

Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board 

Enclosures 
Heather McTeer Toney 

Regional Administrator 

April 9, 2015 

Page 2 of2 

cc (electronically): 

Mr. R. Scott Davis, Branch Chief US EPA 

Ms. Lynorae Benjamin, US EPA 

Ms. Kelly Sheckler, US EPA 

Ms. Lynne A. Liddington, Knoxville, TN 

Mr. Malcolm H. Butler, DAPC, Nashville, TN 

Mr. Marc Corrigan, DAPC, Nashville, TN
Take notice that on January 27, 2000, Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, Sixth Revised Sheet No. 288A, to become effective February 1, 2000.

Williston Basin states that on January 18, 2000, it filed with the Commission, pursuant to Order Nos. 636, et seq., and Subsection 39.3.1 of the General Terms and Conditions of Williston Basin's FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, certain tariff sheets to implement the recovery of Gas Supply Realignment Transition Costs. The tariff sheets in the referenced filing proposed a new reservation charge surcharge of 43.714 cents per equivalent dekatherm of Maximum Daily Delivery Quantity applicable to firm transportation service and a new GSR unit rate of 0.441 cents per dekatherm applicable to Rate Schedule IT-1.

Williston Basin also states it has come to its attention that it inadvertently neglected to include reference to the GSR surcharge in Subsection 21.6.1, of the General Terms and Conditions of its Tariff. Williston Basin states that it is filing Sixth Revised Sheet No. 288A to include reference to the GSR surcharge in Subsection 21.6.1, Reservation Rate Discounts, of the General Terms and Conditions of its Tariff.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-2791 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2 to 10-QSB
----------------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of Prologic Management Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Edwin G. Hubert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company for the periods presented.



                                              /s/  Edwin G. Hubert
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Edwin G. Hubert
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              Prologic Management Systems, Inc.
                                              August 14, 2003
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 115 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.115
                                          Agreed to July 1, 1993        
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, July 1, 
1993, it stand adjourned until noon on Tuesday, July 13, 1993, or until 
noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant 
to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, July 1, 1993 or Friday, July 2, 1993, pursuant to a motion 
made by the Majority Leader, or his designee, in accordance with this 
resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon, or until such 
time as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the 
motion to recess or adjourn, on Tuesday, July 13, 1993, or until noon on 
the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Attest:







                                  Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:







                                                Secretary of the Senate.`
#### LIVELY v. STATE.

No. 23683.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June *4, 1947.*

Joe Bailey Humphreys, of Crockett, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was charged with unlawfully carrying on and about his person a pistol and by a jury sentenced to a term of 60 days in jail, and he appeals.

There are 23 bills of exception in the record, many of them but not all, however, reflecting error.

We think the actions of appellant at the time it was claimed he carried this pistol should have been admitted, and not his various misdeeds prior to the time in question. It is plainly apparent from the admitted testimony that appellant is a wayward young man, often found in trouble while trespassing upon the rights of others. Nevertheless, he should be tried upon the facts alone arising upon the occasion in which he was alleged to have carried this pistol, and not upon other misdeeds committed prior thereto.

The court in his charge to the jury twice required that appellant convince them beyond a reasonable doubt of his innocence. This is not the law and such charge was excepted to at the proper time. The following is an instance of an improper charge as shown in Bill of Exception No. 16:

“Now, if you believe from the evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant, J. B. Lively, did not carry, in the County of Houston, and State of Texas, on or about the 11th day of January, A. D., *8511947, as alleged, in what is commonly known as the ‘White Spot’, a restaurant, in Houston County, Texas, unlawfully carry on and about his person a pistol, as charged, then he would not be guilty as charged, and if you so find, you will find the defendant not guilty.

*****

“If you find from the evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant is not guilty of the charge as alleged, you will say by your verdict, ‘We, the jury, find the defendant not guilty’ and sign said verdict by the Foreman of the Jury.’ ”

The State’s Attorney before our court confesses error herein, and we agree with him.

To write on each one of the 23 bills, many of them complaining of errors, would unduly lengthen this opinion. Suffice it to say that in the event of another trial, appellant should be tried only on the facts surrounding the alleged carrying of a pistol.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
1The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2805

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

Gerardo Vasquez-Rodriguez, also * of Minnesota.

known as Raul Gonzales Munoz, *

also known as Jose R. Gerero, also * [UNPUBLISHED]

known as Raul Acosta-Munoz, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: April 6, 2001

 Filed: April 12, 2001

___________

Before LOKEN, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Gerardo Vasquez-Rodriguez, a Mexican citizen, appeals the sentence of

66 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release imposed on him by the district

court1 after he pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of
-2-

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). On appeal, counsel moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), filing a brief in which she argued that the court erred

by not granting a more substantial downward departure.

We conclude Mr. Vasquez-Rodriguez’s sentence is unreviewable. See United

States v. Arps, 197 F.3d 1202, 1203 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (challenge to extent

of downward departure is unreviewable); United States v. Nguyen, 46 F.3d 781, 783

(8th Cir. 1995) (defendant who explicitly and voluntarily exposes himself to specific

sentence may not challenge that punishment on appeal); United States v. Dutcher,

8 F.3d 11, 12 (8th Cir. 1993) (extent of downward departure is unreviewable,

regardless of court’s reasons for refraining from departing further).

Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75 (1988), we have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. 

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT
P.O. Box 60908 Fairbanks, AK 99706 / 5525 Airport Industrial Rd., Fairbanks AK 99709 Telephone (907) 450-2375 Fax (907) 450-2326

April 28, 2010

Federal Aviation Administration Office of Rulemaking, ARM 800 Independence Avenue, Room 810 Washington, DC 20591

Via electronic submission

Re: Exemption No. 4296

Everts Air Fuel, Inc. respectfully reques ts that Exemption No.4296 be amended to include an additional aircraft N555SQ.

All conditions and reasons relative to public interest remain unchanged.

Sincerely,

James A. Young Director of Operations

Everts Air Fuel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                                 5
       
<S>                                                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                     JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                             1,593,857
<SECURITIES>                                                      11,344,010
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     16,379,346
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         835,000
<INVENTORY>                                                          381,451
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  33,576,169
<PP&E>                                                            12,303,042
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     2,735,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    57,149,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             17,157,362
<BONDS>                                                              877,595
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                              91,753
<OTHER-SE>                                                        38,373,193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      57,149,903
<SALES>                                                           12,999,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  31,495,955
<CGS>                                                              1,538,982
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     10,558,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  14,845,271
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   138,162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    6,581,989
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       2,002,812
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                4,579,086
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       4,579,086
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                            .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            .49
        

</TABLE>
1

The Honorable Ralph R. Erickson, United States District Judge for the District

of North Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-2444

___________

Frederick W. Keiser, Jr., *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District

* of North Dakota.

Christopher Johnson; Jasmine H. *

Dzhanszyan; Law Firm of Criminal * [UNPUBLISHED]

Defense Associates; Drew H. Wrigley, *

United States Attorney, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: June 23, 2008

Filed: July 10, 2008

___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Frederick W. Keiser, Jr., appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal of his complaint

against his former criminal defense attorneys and the United States Attorney for the

District of North Dakota, in which Keiser sought damages for violations of the

Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, state
-2-

law fraud, and “attorney discipline,” and requested a writ of mandamus to compel the

United States Attorney to bring a criminal prosecution. After carefully reviewing the

record and Keiser’s arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Benton

v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 524 F.3d 866, 870 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review). 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. We also grant the motion to strike the

documents in Keiser’s addendum and appendix that were not contained in the record

below, and we deny Keiser’s request to supplement the record. See Dakota Indus.,

Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc., 988 F.2d 61, 63 (8th Cir. 1993) (appellate court

generally cannot consider evidence not contained in record below).

______________________________
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

        Inconnection with the periodic report of PC Mall, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ted Sanders,Chief Financial Officer****of the Company, hereby certify as of the datehereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the UnitedStates Code, that to the best of my knowledge: 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

| Date: November 14, 2002 | /s/Ted Sanders         |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    | Ted Sanders                                                    |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer                                        |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001052636
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000



<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                   876,300
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               876,300
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 876,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    850,000
<COMMON>                                        26,300
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   876,300
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,795
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 63,795
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,795
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,795
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>