alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,517
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  267,386
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     87,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               432,661
<PP&E>                                       1,580,860
<DEPRECIATION>                                 244,394
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,886,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          347,619
<BONDS>                                        918,755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        460
<COMMON>                                         5,145
<OTHER-SE>                                     464,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,886,955
<SALES>                                      1,677,154
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,677,154
<CGS>                                        1,454,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,550,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,627
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,376
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,894
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,482
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,482
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37
        
                    


</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3447 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to make clear that Federal employees 

who receive back pay for a period during which they are furloughed 

due to a lapse in appropriations may not also receive unemployment 

compensation for the same period. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2013 

Mr. BRADY of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to make clear that 

Federal employees who receive back pay for a period 

during which they are furloughed due to a lapse in 

appropriations may not also receive unemployment compensation for the same period. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Furloughed Federal 

5 Employee Double Dip Elimination Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3447 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8508 of title 5, United 

3 States Code, is amended— 

4 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before the first sentence; 

5 and 

6 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(b) The rules and regulations shall include provi8 sions to ensure that, in the case of a Federal employee 

9 who receives back pay for a period during which such em10 ployee was furloughed due to a lapse in appropriations— 

11 ‘‘(1) such back pay shall be treated in the same 

12 way as Federal wages attributable to such employee; 

13 and 

14 ‘‘(2) the period to which such back pay relates 

15 shall be treated in the same way as a period of Fed16 eral service attributable to such employee.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 subsection (a) shall be effective as of September 30, 2013. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In re Whitmore et al.

(No. 28320

Decided October 2, 1940.)

*314
      *Mr. Louis Tyroler*and *Mr. John W. Bolin,*for petitioner.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, *Mr. Gra/ry Da/vis, Mr. Harold J. Rose*and *Mr. R. W. Finsterwald,*for respondent.

By the Court.

The petitioner contends:

“This application is predicated upon the proposition that the trial court *lost*jurisdiction by going beyond the precincts of the courtroom and out of *sight*and *hearing*of the proceedings and therefore all subsequent proceedings, to wit: the verdict and judgment became, thereby, nullities.

“By reason of the judge’s absence and his failure to retain control of the proceedings there was a complete cessation of the trial and no valid verdict could be returned nor judgment of the court rendered because the trial ‘lapsed.’ Where there is no trial there can be no appeal and our sole right of relief lies in a writ of *habeas corpus*which is prayed for from this court.”

It appears from the journal entries attached to the petition that the Court of Common Pleas overruled motions by the defendants to suspend the execution *315of their sentences and admit the defendants to bail pending appeal.

The remedy for review of errors or irregularities in the conduct of a criminal trial or sentence of an accused is by appeal and not by *habeas corpus*when the court has jurisdiction of the crime and the person. *Ex parte Van Hagan,*25 Ohio St., 426; 20 Ohio Jurisprudence, 445, Section 23.

*Writ denied.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, William R. Ringo, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Abgenix, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|                      |  |                                                                                                        
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 15, 2005 |  |                                                                                                        
|                      |  | /s/WILLIAM R. RINGOWilliam R. Ringo
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

---



QuickLinks
EPA Plans for D4 

Risk Assessment

December 6, 2012

Ward Penberthy
EPA Plans for D4 Risk Assessment

• As part of EPA’s comprehensive approach to enhance the Agency’s existing chemical 

management program, in March 2012, EPA identified a work plan of 83 chemicals for 

further assessment under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). 

• The process EPA adopted emphasized focusing on chemicals that meet one or more of 

the following factors: 

– Potentially of concern to children’s health (for example, concern for reproductive 

or developmental effects) 

– Neurotoxic effects 

– Probable or known carcinogens 

– Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic (PBT) 

– Used in consumer and children’s products 

– Detected in biomonitoring programs 

• EPA initially identified 7 of the 83 work plan chemicals for risk assessment in 2012.

• On June 1, 2012, EPA identified an additional 18 chemicals for assessment during 2013 

and 2014. D4 is one of these chemicals
Criteria which led to D4 inclusion in 

the Workplan

• High production volume (100-500 million lb/yr)

• Highly persistent in sediment

• High bioaccumulation potential

• Potential reproductive toxicity

• Aquatic toxicity

• Use in consumer products (soaps and detergents, adhesives and sealants, 

polishes and sanitation products)

• Present in biomonitoring (blood, breast milk and aquatic species)

• Also found in indoor environments, sediments and surface water

• ECA activity

• Scheduled to begin IRIS process in 2013
Siloxane ECA Relevance to Planned 

Workplan Risk Assessment

– Would provide valuable environmental monitoring data which could substantially 

contribute to an exposure assessment that would be used in the D4 risk 

assessment 

– Would reduce uncertainty in the planned risk assessment

– EPA believes SEHSC’s monitoring proposal of 4 direct discharge sites and 5 POTWs 

would be insufficient to develop an informed national exposure assessment. 

Pursuing such a limited monitoring strategy could result in anecdotal data which 

would likely not reduce the uncertainty associated with understanding the 

concentrations of D4 in environmental media and biota. If pursued, the limited 

monitoring data collected under the SEHSC proposal may be an inefficient use of 

EPA’s and industry’s resources. EPA believes its current proposal would provide a 

much higher quality data set.
EPA’s Likely Approach to Exposure 

Assessment in the Absence of 

Monitoring Data Sought by the ECA

• EPA would consider available information, including:

– Existing limited monitoring and release data

– Release estimating methods often used in the EPA’s New Chemicals Program

– Conservative models that estimate environmental concentrations resulting from 

releases

– Conservative models that estimate bioaccumulation and bio magnification in aquatic 

organisms

– Information submitted under the Dow Product Stewardship Agreement

– Previously prepared generic Conceptual Site Models and Mass Balance Report

– Assessment efforts of other countries (UK, Canada)

• EPA may supplement available information with additional data gathering initiatives.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, Charles M. Kluck,
the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Amstar Financial Services, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Charles M. Kluck
------------------------
Charles M. Kluck

March 5, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Registrant and will be retained by
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3413

___________

Stetson Geiger; Marilyn Geiger, *

 *

Appellants, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

City of Oppelo; Herschell Payne; * Eastern District of Arkansas. 

Jeannie Andrews, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: September 18, 1998

 Filed: September 23, 1998

___________

Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD

ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

Stetson and Marilyn Geiger, husband and wife, appeal from district court&s entry 1

of summary judgment in favor of the City of Oppelo, Arkansas, and its mayor and city

clerk/recorder, in this action raising claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986,

and also under state law. Upon a thorough review of the record and the parties&
-2-

submissions on appeal, we affirm the judgment in favor of defendants on the federal

claims. We construe the court&s order to have dismissed the state claims without

prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1367, and affirm that ruling as well. See 28 U.S.C. §

1367(d) (tolling period of limitations for state law claims while claims are pending and

for 30 days after dismissal or longer period if provided by state law). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 10.19



|                   |  |  |                               |                                
|------------------ |  |  | ----------------------------- | -------------------------------
|LOGO               |  |  |                               | Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc.   
|                   |  |  | 11119 North Torrey Pines Road
|                   |  |  | La Jolla, California 92037   
|September 12, 2006 |  |  |                               | T 858 587 2770   F 858 458 3504
|                   |  |  |                               | www.mbsis.com                  

Barry Gumbiner, M.D.

221 Coldspring Court

Franklin Township, NJ 08873

Dear Barry:

The purpose of this letter is to provide you with an addendum to the terms set forth in your offer letter dated September 6,
2006. In addition to the offer of employment with the same benefits and policy guidelines set forth in your original offer letter, the following terms will be added.

In addition to the relocation summary, Metabasis will agree to pay up to 2 trips to New Jersey to oversee the sale and close of your home and move of your household goods. In addition, we will pay for your rental car
while in New Jersey and from the time you arrive in San Diego until your own automobile is delivered.

Per your professional expenses, Metabasis will pay
your membership in at least three professional societies of your choice. Metabasis will also pay for up to 2 state medical licenses. Additionally, Metabasis agrees to let you take up to one half day of each week to work in a clinic and will pay for
your malpractice insurance if this is not provided by the clinic.

According to our current stock options guidelines, you will be eligible to receive up to
33,450 options each year based on your performance. Please find the Stock Option Agreement attached to this document.

To formally record your
acknowledgement of this addendum, please sign below and return one original of this letter to me as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

LOGO

Howard Foyt, M.D., Ph.D.

Vice
President, Clinical Development



|                     |  |  |  |        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------
|LOGO                 |  |  |  | 9-19-06
|Barry Gumbiner, M.D. |  |  |  | Date
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled

In the document appearing on page 51794, FR Doc 00-21810, in the issue of August 25, 2000, in the second column the Committee published a proposed addition for Vegetable Oil. From comments that were received, the Committee realized that the requirement that was being proposed for addition to the Procurement List was open to several interpretations. The Committee then published a document appearing on page 60903, FR Doc 00-26361, in the issue of October 13, 2000, in the second column another proposed addition for Vegetable Oil. This notice of October 13, 2000 should have indicated that it was replacing the proposed addition of August 25, 2000. To clarify, the Committee is proposing to add an additional 5% of the government requirement for Vegetable Oil. If added, this will increase the requirement on the Procurement List from 15% to 20%.

Louis R. Bartalot, 

Deputy Director (Operations). 

[FR Doc. 00-27683 Filed 10-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
(LOGO)    ERNST & YOUNG LLP
          One Columbus
          10 West Broad Street                    Phone: 614 224 5678
          Columbus, Ohio 43215-3400               Fax:   614 222 3939



                          Independent Auditors' Report

Board of Directors
The Huntington Mortgage Company

We have examined  management's  assertion,  included in the accompanying  report
titled REPORT OF MANAGEMENT,  that The  Huntington  Mortgage  Company  (HMC), a
wholly-owned  subsidiary  of The  Huntington  National  Bank,  complied with the
minimum  servicing  standards set forth in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of
America's  UNIFORM SINGLE  ATTESTATION  PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE  BANKERS during the
year ended  December 31, 1997.  Management is responsible  for HMC's  compliance
with  those  requirements.  Our  responsibility  is to  express  an  opinion  on
management's assertion about HMC's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination  was conducted in accordance  with standards  established by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on  a  test  basis,  evidence  about  HMC's  compliance  with  those
requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered  necessary in
the circumstances.  We believe that our examination  provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on HMC's
compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that HMC complied with the aforementioned
requirements  during the year ended December 31, 1997 is fairly  stated,  in all
material respects.

                                                      /s/Ernst & Young LLP


March 12, 1998


       Ernst & Young LLP is a member of Ernst & Young International, Ltd.
Exhibit 32(a)

              SECTION 1350 Certification (Chief Executive Officer)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Financial Corporation, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I Michael C. Gerald,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that to the
best of my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the Report.

This Certification is provided as of February 9, 2005.


                                             /s/ Michael C. Gerald
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Michael C. Gerald
                                             President/Chief Executive Officer


                                       29
Land Visuals LLC has been operating a small UAV for filmmaking purposes for the past 

6 months. We are a one man operation specializing in filmmaking. I am a 

cinematographer utilizing various HD cameras as well to complete my product. I have 

always maintained and taken seriously the proper flight limits(used to hold my private 

pilot single engine cert.) for UAV outlined by the FAA.

With over 200 flights and 50 hours with no incidents Land Visuals would like to branch 

out into gathering aerial imaging for engineering firms, architecture clients, search and 

rescue and agriculture.

Sincerely,

Dillon Jenkins

Chief Pilot

Land Visuals LLC
#### FARRIER v. STATE.

No. 24809.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 7, 1950.

*830None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for theft of property over the value of Fifty Dollars. The jury assessed his punishment at two years in the penitentiary.

The record contains neither a statement of facts nor hill of exceptions. All the proceedings appear regular and nothing is presented for review by this Court.

The judgment is affirmed.