alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
lllllllllllllflll]llf IIIII IIIII 1111111111111 

1719564- R8 SDMS ~ ----~-----J 

COLORADO 

: Department·of Public 

: Health & Environment 

Ded~cated to·proteding an:d improvillg the-healthand environm:ent ·Of. the people of Colorado 

October 7, 2015 

Linda Kiefer 

Remediation Project Manager 

U.S. EPA, Region 8 

1595 Wynkoop Street (EPR-SR) 

Denver, CO 80202 

RE: CDPHE Concurrence on Partial Deletion of Operable Unit 3 of the California 

Gulch Superfund Site 

Dear Ms. Kiefer: 

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) has reviewed 

both the Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion and the direct fmal Notice of Partial 

Deletion for Operable Unit 3 (Denver & Rio Grand Western Railroad Company 

[D&RGW] Slag Piles/Railroad· Easement/Railroad Yard) of the California Gulch 

Superfund Site, 

CDPHE originally provided a letter of concern to EPAon February 23,2015 regarding 

the Partial Deletion of Operable Unit 3. However, subsequent to a clarification meeting 

between EPA and CDPHE on March 3, 2015, including CD PRE's follow up letter to 

EPA dated March 18, 2015, EPA and the State have determined that all appropriate 

response actions under the Comprehensive .Environmental Response, Compensation, and 

Liability Act(CERCLA), other than operations and maintenance, monitoring, and fiveyear reviews, have been completed. Furthermore, institutional! controls {ICs) are in place 

in the form of a county ordinance in order to ensure long-tenn protectiveness of the 

remedy. EPA will continue ·to conduct five-year reviews~ In order to ensure thatthe 

county appropriately understands the IC and implements the county ordinance 

accordingly, EPA and the State met with the Lake County Building and Land Use 

Department on July 28,2015 for adetail~d discussion and also supplied an updated map 

for use with'the county ordinance. 

Therefore, CDPHE agrees that aH necessary actions have been taken to delete Operable 

Unit 3 oftheCalifornia Gukh Superfund Site from the National Priorities List. 

Sincer~ly, / 'i 

C:! - 7cr.-~u, ,_ I 77~ ))c.-/.<> ~~- /--'~ 

.. 

Gary B · hman ./ 

Director 

Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division 

cc: Jennifer Robbins, AGO 

Doug Jamison, CDPHE 

Monica Sheets, CDPHE 

4300 Cherry· Creek Drive 5., Denver, CO 80246·1530' P 303·692·2000 www.colorado.gov/cdphe 

John w. Hickenlooper, Governor 1 Larry Wotk, MD, MSPH, Executive Director and Chief Medtcctl Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

In accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, and the General Services Administration (GSA) rule on Federal Advisory Committee Management, 41 CFR Part 101-6, and after consultation with GSA, the Secretary of Commerce has determined that the renewal of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership National Advisory Board is in the public interest in connection with the performance of the duties imposed on the Department by law.

The Committee was first established in October 1996 to advise MEP regarding their programs, plans, and policies. In reviewing the Board, the Secretary has established it for an additional two years. During the next two years, the Board plans to address center service mix standardization, eBusiness, moving toward high performance centers, training and education of field staff, MEP University, national awareness of the MEP program, international services, and others.

The Board will consist of nine members to be appointed by the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology to assure a balanced membership that will represent the views and needs of customers, providers, and others involved in industrial extension throughout the United States.

The Board will function solely as an advisory body and in compliance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Copies of the Board's revised charter will be filed with the appropriate committees of the Congress and with the Library of Congress.

Inquiries or comments may be directed to Linda Acierto, Senior Policy Advisor, Manufacturing Extension Partnership, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Shop 4800, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-4800; telephone: 301-975-5020.

Karen H. Brown,

Deputy Director, NIST.

[FR Doc. 00-27900  Filed 10-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-13-M
#### CANALES v. STATE.

No. 24052.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 26, 1948.

Rehearing Denied June 23, 1948.

Tom J. Newton, Sr., of San Antonio, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*951BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was assessed a fine of $50.00 upon his conviction for failure to stop and render aid to parties with whom his car collided.

It is difficult to understand why the trial judge would overrule the motion for a new trial in this case. The State’s Attorney has confessed error which is plainly shown by the record.

Appellant did not testify. When the jury retired to consider the verdict they discussed this fact and considered it as a circumstance against him, contrary to the provisions of Article 710, Vernon’s Ann, C.C.P., as interpreted by many decisions of the Court annotated under said Article (Note 44). See also Article 753, Sec. 8, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. and authorities cited thereunder, as well as Stewart v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 206 S.W.2d 88.

The law which permits the judge to discuss the failure of a defendant to testify, in his charge, at the same time forbids the prosecution to refer to such failure, or the jury to consider it as a circumstance against him. It may appear to be inconsistent, but it is the law, passed by the legislature, which this Court and all trial courts should respect. Under the showing made, with the admitted fact that the jury did discuss the appellant’s failure to testify in his own behalf and considered it as a circumstance against him, the motion for a new trial should have been granted.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.

On Motion for Rehearing

KRUEGER, Judge.

The state, by and through its able district attorney, has filed a lengthy motion for rehearing in which it is contended that -we committed an egregious error in reversing and remanding this case on the ground that the jury, in their deliberation, commented on appellant’s failure to testify. Such a reference by the jury'in their deliberation on the case is inhibited by Art. .710, C.C.P., as pointed out in the original opinion. See also Lout v. State, 122 Tex. Cr.R. 448, 56 S.W.2d 454; Reese v. State, 102 Tex.Cr.R. 511, 278 S.W. 451; and McCoy v. State, 113 Tex.Cr.R. 302, 21 S.W.2d 516. Many other cases might be cited on the subject.

Believing that the case was properly disposed of on original submission, the state’s motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3438 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3438

 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize use of grants 
    under the Urban Area Security Initiative and the State Homeland 
  Security Grant Program to work in conjunction with a Department of 
                      Energy national laboratory.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2013

Mr. Swalwell of California (for himself, Mr. Simpson, Ms. Lofgren, Ms. 
Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, Mr. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico, 
 Mr. Foster, and Mrs. Napolitano) introduced the following bill; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize use of grants 
    under the Urban Area Security Initiative and the State Homeland 
  Security Grant Program to work in conjunction with a Department of 
                      Energy national laboratory.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Laboratories Mean National 
Security Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT FUNDS IN CONJUNCTION WITH 
              DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL LABORATORIES.

    Section 2008(a) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 
609(a)) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by inserting 
``including by working in conjunction with a National Laboratory (as 
defined in section 2(3) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 
15801(3)),'' after ``plans,''.
                                 <all>
```
P. 1


# OAR Box 1802 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 72 ) IV-E-6 6 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/2008 11:58:00 AM

Sheet 72 of 117P. 2

# f\-°ib-%lDate : July 31 , 200 0 To : Ai r an d Radiatio n Docke

t #A-90-3 7 From : Denni s Crumpler , Integrate d Implementatio n Group , ITPID , MD-1 2 Re : Meetin g wit

h NED A CAR

P O n Octobe r 22,1997 , staf

f fromth e Integrate d Implementatio n Grou p a t EPA' s Office o f Ai r Qualit y Plannin g an

d Standard s me

t wit h representative s ofth e Nationa l Environmenta

l Developmen

t Associatio n Clea

n Ai r Regulator y Projec t (NEDA CARP) i n Durham , Nort h Carolina . A

n attende e lis t

i s attached . Thi s wa s on e o f severa l session s tha

t da y wit h thi s grou p industr y representive s tha

t visi t OAQPS periodicall y t o sta y abreas t ofth e activitie s o f

thi s EP A offic e tha t affec t their respectiv e companies . The purpos e ofth e meetin g wa s t o provide NEDA CAR P wit h a n updat e o n th e schedul e ofth e NS R Refor mrulemaking . Denni s Crumple r gav e a quic k repor t o f ho w th e publi c comment s wer e generally spli t

o n th e majo

r part s ofth e NS R Refor mrule . The NEDA CAR

P members querie d ho w wa s EP A plannin g to implemen

t th e President' s directiv e o n th e ne w Nationa l Ambien t Air Qualit y Standard s fo

r ozone an d fin e particulat e matter relativ e t o ne w sourc e review (NSR

) and th e final NS R Refor

m(now "NS R Improvement" ) rulemaking . The EP A indicate d som

e idea s ha d bee n internall y discusse d fo r grouping part s ofth e NS RRefor mrul e int o sequentia

l rulemaking s due t

o th e resourc e an

d schedul e requirement s impose d b y th e President' s directive , but tha t othe r strategie s coul d b e adopted . Substantiv e issue s in th e NS R Transitio n Progra mfo r th e ne w ozone an

d P M NAAQ S an d th e NS R Refor

mrul e wer

e no t debate d o r

discussed . cc : Pa mSmith , (MD-12 ) Jo n Devine , OG

C Attendees : Erni e Rosenberg , Occidenta l Petroleum Bill , Burkhart , Procte

r & Gamble Kare n Blanchard , EPA , OAQPS Tod d Hyde , Merck

Pharmaceutica

l Denni s Crumpler , EPA , OAQPS Berni e Paul , El i Lill y & Co . Maxine Dewbury , Procte r & Gamble Davi d Emery , Phillip s Petroleum Lesli e Ritts , Esq . Hoga n & Hartson-NED A Car

p BarbaraBankoff

, Representin g Eli Lilly & C o Ya t Yeung Lucen

t Technologie s Lyn n Hutchinson , EPA , OAQPS 

# "

1P. 3 

# •A. Dav

e Svendsgaar d To : bill.pedersen@shawpittman.co m 07/28/0 0 03:2 9 P M cc : Denni s Crumpler/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Subject : Follow-u p o n PC P Exclusio n issue s Bill , Jus t wante d t o giv e yo u m y emai l address
. A s w e discusse d afte rTuesday' s meeting , w e certainl y wan t t o hea rabou t an y case s i n whic h BACT-leve l contro l ha s bee n require d fo rmitigatin g collatera l pollutant
_ increase s i n orde rt o qualif y fo rth e PC P Exclusion
. Dav e Svendsgaar d EPA/OAQPS/ITPID/II G 919.541.2380-phon e 919.541.5509-fa x
#### TINSLEY v. STATE.

No. 26027.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 12, 1952.

No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn,. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from -a conviction for violation of the liquor law, with a fine of $250.

There is neither a statement of facts nor bill of exception brought, forward in this record. All proceedings appear regular and nothing is presented for review by this court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
'poCV^ r doO<< -^^^ ISACKSON, WALLACE & PFEIFER, P.C. 

ATTORNEY S AT LAW 

114 S. SECON D AVENU E 

•', r.THcMT (vT ALPENA, MICHIGAN 49707 

KEITH WALLACE - • '^'t\\ l^'jir-; ^J^i:, , (989) 354-8242 

WILLIAM A. PFEIFER • ;^ -jSr Uii I Al lUN FAX (989) 356-3369 

NANCY A. WARD .'CT OppqATirV'-IQ. 

DYLAN J. WALLACE ' - "'' '' ' "' '-" ' " ISADOREISACKSON (1901-1988) 

,, , ., , JMovemberlO, 2011 

! Li A i P U Z 

Department of Transportation 

Attn: Kevin Adams 

Re: Air Service to Alpena County Regional Airport 

Dear Mr. Adams: 

Please consider the following issues regarding air service to the Alpena Regional Airport. 

Alpena needs guaranteed code-sharing (integrated reservation system). * Over 3 million 

dollars in Essential Air Service subsidy for less service is not a good use of taxpayer 

money. 

If Alpena passengers experience a cancelled flight in Cleveland, there are very few 

options in getting home when compared to Detroit. 

The current bid does not give us clear expectations on ticket prices in all situations. 

The planes proposed are much smaller - with no restrooms. Although the air time is 45 

minutes, the actual time on the plane is much longer, possibly leaving people in a very 

uncomfortable situation. 

Alpena deserves better - the Alpena Combat Readiness Training Center and the Thunder 

Bay National Marine Sanctuary have a very important need for reliable air service that the 

current bids do not meet. 

The current bidder does not have a strong network of support. There are a limited number 

of planes available for them to serve their market(s) so where does that leave us when a 

plane experiences mechanical issues? 

Cleveland is not a gateway airport and would add an extra stop to most flights. This adds 

time and expense to our travelers. 

The community would like the DOT to re-bid service to Alpena so we can find a better 

solution. 

More time is needed because the issue is more about lack of competition than it is about 

cost and we need timie to find the best solution for all parties involved. 

Alpena's traffic is up two years in a row and our projections, based on economic 

development projects and activity show continued increases in traffic. 

Cancelled seats are currently being used when figuring load factors and are driving that 

percentage down. Seats on cancelled flights should not be counted as open seats when 

figuring load factors. 

Sincerely, 

Isackson, Wallace & Pfeifer, P.C. 

Keith Wallace
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp. (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period
ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (subject to the Company's position prevailing in regard to the
unresolved SEC comment, as more fully described in the Report); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 15, 2007


By: /s/ LEO LIEBOWITZ
    ---------------------------------
    Leo Liebowitz
    Chairman and Chief Executive
    Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 209 (Friday, October 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27634]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3299]


State of Ohio; Amendment #1

    In accordance with information received from the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency on October 5, 2000, the above-numbered Declaration is 
hereby amended to change the deadline for filing applications for 
physical damages as a result of this disaster from November 25, 2000 to 
November 27, 2000.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for economic injury is June 26, 2001.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: October 6, 2000.
Allan I. Hoberman,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-27634 Filed 10-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

I, S. Gene Thompson, ChiefFinancial Officer of Gasel Transportation Lines, Inc. (the “Registrant”), dohereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

1.                                       TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period endedSeptember 30, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GaselTransportation Lines, Inc. and will be retained by Gasel Transportation Lines,Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 
| Dated: | November 13, 2003 | By:    | /s/  S. Gene  Thompson                                 |   |
|--------|-------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |              |   | S. Gene Thompson, Vice  President & Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration 

          - 21 CFR Part 876 
          - [Docket No. 94N-0380] 

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a final rule that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of September 26, 2000 (65 FR 57726). The final rule requires the filing of a premarket approval application or a notice of completion of a product development protocol for the implanted mechanical/hydraulic urinary continence device, a generic type of medical device intended for the treatment of urinary incontinence. In the final rule, the effective date was stated incorrectly. This document corrects that error.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nicole L. Wolanski, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (HFZ-470), Food and Drug Administration, 9200 Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850, 301-594-2194. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. 00-24632 appearing on page 57726 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of September 26, 2000, the following correction is made:                 

                    1. On page 57726, in the second column, under the                     **EFFECTIVE DATE**                     caption, the date “October 26, 2000” is corrected to read “September 26, 2000.”                 

Dated: October 19, 2000. 

Linda S. Kahan, 

Deputy Director for Regulations Policy, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. 

[FR Doc. 00-27736 Filed 10-27-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F