# Patent

## Title
Valuable metal extraction agent and valuable metal extraction method using said extraction agent

## Abstract

The objective of the present invention is to selectively extract light rare earth metals, and by extension, europium, from an acidic solution containing a plurality of types of rare earth metal. This valuable metal extraction agent is represented by the general formula. In the formula: R1 and R2 each indicate the same or different alkyl group; R3 indicates a hydrogen atom or an alkyl group; and R4 indicates a hydrogen atom or any given group other than an amino group bonded to the α carbon as an amino acid. Preferably, the general formula has a glycine unit, a histidine unit, a lysine unit, an aspartic acid unit, or an N-methylglycine unit. Preferably, when extracting europium using the extraction agent, the pH is adjusted into the range of 2.0-3.0 inclusive, and when selectively extracting light rare earth metals, the pH is adjusted to 1.7-2.7 inclusive.

## Background
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is the national phase under 35 U.S.C. §371 of PCT International Application No. PCT/JP2012/078445, filed Feb. 11, 2012, which claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-178293, filed Aug. 10, 2012; Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-056143, filed Mar. 13, 2012; and Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-245981, filed Nov. 9, 2011, the entire contents of the aforementioned applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to a valuable metal extraction agent and a valuable metal extraction method using said extraction agent.
BACKGROUND ART
Cobalt and rare earth metals are known as valuable metals and used for various applications in industry. Cobalt is used for positive electrode materials for secondary batteries, and furthermore for superalloys (high strength heat-resistant alloys) used for e.g. jet engines for aircraft, and the like. Rare earth metals are used for fluorescent materials, negative electrode materials for nickel-hydrogen batteries, additives for magnets installed in motors, abrasives for glass substrates used for liquid crystal display panels and hard disk drives, and the like.
In recent years, energy savings have been strongly promoted, and in the automobile industry conventional gasoline-engined cars are being rapidly replaced by hybrid cars and electric cars equipped with secondary batteries using cobalt and rare earth metals. In lighting equipment, conventional fluorescent lamps are being rapidly replaced by efficient three band fluorescent lamps using rare earth metals such as lanthan, cerium, yttrium, terbium and europium. The above cobalt and rare earth metals are scarce resources, and most of them depend on imports.
Yttrium and europium have been used for fluorescent substances in cathode ray tube television sets in analog broadcasting; however, in recent years, large numbers of cathode ray tubes have been put out of use because of the transition to liquid crystal television sets. Products which have rapidly spread, such as secondary batteries and three band fluorescent lamps, can be also easily expected to cause a large amount of waste in the future as used products. Thus, cobalt and rare earth metals, scarce resources, are treated as waste without recycling of the used products, which is not preferred in terms of resource savings and resource security. Nowadays, the establishment of a method for effectively retrieving valuable metals such as cobalt and rare earth metals from such used products is strongly demanded.
Mixtures of rare earth metals such as lanthan, cerium, yttrium, terbium and europium are used for fluorescent substances used for the three band fluorescent lamps described above. Furthermore, yttrium and europium are contained in the fluorescent substances for cathode ray tubes together with a high percentage of zinc.
As a method for retrieving a specific rare earth metal from a mixture of rare earth metals, a retrieval method by a solvent extraction method from liquid in which the mixture is dissolved in an acid such as a mineral acid is generally used. For the mutual separation of rare earth metals, there is an industrial example using e.g. a phosphorus-based extraction agent, product name PC88A (manufactured by DAIHACHI CHEMICAL INDUSTRY CO., LTD.). This extraction agent, however, has phosphorus in its structure, and thus when the agent is industrially used, a high degree of wastewater treatment is required so that public waters are not contaminated by the extraction agent and deteriorated substances thereof, which move to the drainage system. Since the total volume of the extraction agent is regulated by Water Pollution Prevention Law in specific areas in Japan, its use on an industrial scale involves concerns.
A carboxylic acid-based extraction agent (e.g. 2-methyl-2-ethyl-1-heptanoic acid:neodecanoic acid) is practically used as an extraction agent not containing phosphorus. By this extraction agent, however, extraction is carried out only in a pH region equal to or higher than neutral. Therefore, when an acid solution as described above is a target, a neutralizer is required in large amounts, and there is concern about cost increases. Furthermore, the extraction ability of carboxylic acid-based extraction agents is lower than that of the above-described phosphorus-based extraction agents, and excessive equipment is required. Therefore, there is also the problem of a cost increase.
To solve such problems, an extraction agent, which has the skeleton of diglycol amic acid and is called DODGAA, has been developed (see Patent Document 1). When this extraction agent is used, however, as shown in Non-Patent Document 1, yttrium (Y), lutetium (Lu), ytterbium (Yb), thulium (Tm), erbium (Er) and holmium (Ho), which are called heavy rare earth metals, among rare earth metals have a strong tendency to be extracted together with dysprosium (Dy), terbium (Tb), gadolinium (Gd), europium (Eu) and samarium (Sm), which are called middle rare earth metals, and thus the extraction agent is not suitable for the mutual separation of rare earth metals. In addition, the extraction rates of promethium (Pm), neodym (Nd), praseodym (Pr), cerium (Ce) and lanthan (La), which are called light rare earth metals, by DODGAA are low. Especially, europium (Eu), which is produced in small quantities and is expensive, cannot be selectively retrieved from other rare earth metals. Thus, an extraction agent which is capable of mutually separating rare earth metals and further an extraction agent which is capable of efficiently extracting light rare earth metals have not been found.
[Patent Document 1] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, Publication No. 2007-327085
[Non-Patent Document 1] K. Shimojo, H. Naganawa, J. Noro, F. Kubota and M. Goto; Extraction behavior and separation of lanthanides with a diglycol amic acid derivative and a nitrogen-donor ligand; Anal. Sci., 23, 1427-30, 2007 December.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
Problems to be Solved by the Invention
An object of the present invention is to provide an extraction agent which is capable of selectively extracting not only light rare earth metals but also europium from an acid solution comprising a plurality of types of rare earth metal, and a valuable metal extraction method using this extraction agent.
As a result of repeated intensive investigation to solve the above problem, the present inventors found that the above object could be achieved by providing a valuable metal extraction agent comprising an amide derivative represented by the following general formula (I), thereby completing the present invention.
Means for Solving the Problems
Specifically, the present invention provides as follows.
(1) The present invention is a valuable metal extraction agent comprising an amide derivative represented by the following general formula (I):




(wherein, R1 and R2 each represent the same or different alkyl groups;
the alkyl group can be a straight chain or a branched chain;
R3 represents a hydrogen atom or an alkyl group; and
R4 represents a hydrogen atom or any group other than an amino group, which is bound to the α carbon as an amino acid).
(2) The present invention is also a valuable metal extraction agent according to (1), wherein the above amide derivative is any one or more of glycinamide derivatives, histidinamide derivatives, lysinamide derivatives, aspartic acid amide derivatives and N-methylglycine derivatives.
(3) The present invention is also a europium extraction method, wherein an acid solution containing rare earth metals and zinc is subjected to solvent extraction by an extraction agent according to (1) or (2) to extract europium from the acid solution.
(4) The present invention is also the europium extraction method according to (3), wherein the acid solution is subjected to the solvent extraction with the pH of the acid solution adjusted to a range of 2.0 or more to 3.0 or less.
(5) The present invention is also the europium extraction method according to (3) or (4), wherein the rare earth metals include europium and yttrium.
(6) The present invention is also an extraction method for light rare earth metals, wherein an acid solution containing light rare earth metals and heavy rare earth metals is subjected to solvent extraction by an extraction agent according to (1) or (2) to extract the light rare earth metals from the acid solution.
(7) The present invention is also the extraction method for light rare earth metals according to (6), wherein the acid solution is subjected to the solvent extraction with the pH of the acid solution adjusted to a range of 1.7 or more to 2.7 or less.
Effects of the Invention
According to the present invention, an extraction agent is provided which is capable of selectively extracting not only light rare earth metals but also europium from an acid solution comprising a plurality of types of rare earth metal, and a valuable metal extraction method is provided using this extraction agent.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a figure showing a 1H-NMR spectrum of a glycinamide derivative synthesized in Example 1.
FIG. 2 is a figure showing a 13C-NMR spectrum of a glycinamide derivative synthesized in Example 1.
FIG. 3 shows the results of the extraction of cobalt from an acid solution comprising cobalt and manganese using the valuable metal extraction agent of Example 1.
FIG. 4 shows the results of the extraction of cobalt from an acid solution comprising cobalt and manganese using the valuable metal extraction agent of Example 2.
FIG. 5 shows the results of the extraction of cobalt from an acid solution comprising cobalt and manganese using the valuable metal extraction agent of Example 3.
FIG. 6 shows the results of the extraction of cobalt from an acid solution comprising cobalt and manganese using the valuable metal extraction agent of Comparative Example 1.
FIG. 7 shows the results of the extraction of europium from an acid solution comprising europium, yttrium and zinc using the valuable metal extraction agent of Example 1.
FIG. 8 shows the results of the extraction of europium from an acid solution comprising europium, yttrium and zinc using the valuable metal extraction agent of Comparative Example 2.
FIG. 9 shows the results of the extraction of light rare earth metals from an acid solution comprising light rare earth metals and heavy rare earth metals using the valuable metal extraction agent of Example 1.



PREFERRED MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
The specific embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail. It should be noted, however, that the present invention is not restricted to the following embodiments and can be carried out with proper modification within the scope of the object of the invention.
Valuable Metal Extraction Agent
The valuable metal extraction agent of the present invention comprises an amide derivative represented by the following general formula (I).




In the formula, substituents R1 and R2 each represent the same or different alkyl groups. The alkyl group can be a straight chain or a branched chain. R3 represents a hydrogen atom or an alkyl group. R4 represents a hydrogen atom or any group other than an amino group, which is bound to the α carbon as an amino acid. In the present invention, lipophilicity is increased by introducing alkyl groups into the amide skeleton, and the compound can be used as an extraction agent.
The above amide derivative is any one or more of glycinamide derivatives, histidinamide derivatives, lysinamide derivatives, aspartic acid amide derivatives and N-methylglycine derivatives. When the amide derivative is a glycinamide derivative, the above glycinamide derivative can be synthesized by the following method. First, a 2-halogenated acetyl halide is added to an alkylamine having a structure represented by NHR1R2 (R1 and R2 are the same as the above substituents R1 and R2), and the hydrogen atom of amine is substituted with a 2-halogenated acetyl by the nucleophilic substitution reaction to obtain a 2-halogenated (N,N-di)alkylacetamide.
Next, the above 2-halogenated (N,N-di)alkylacetamide is added to glycine or an N-alkylglycine derivative, and one of the hydrogen atoms of the glycine or N-alkylglycine derivative is substituted with an (N,N-di)alkylacetamide group by the nucleophilic substitution reaction. A glycine alkylamide derivative can be synthesized by the two-step reactions.
A histidinamide derivative, a lysinamide derivative or an aspartic acid amide derivative can be synthesized by substituting glycine with histidine, lysine or aspartic acid. The extraction behavior of lysine and aspartic acid derivatives is, however, thought to be within the range of the results obtained by using a glycine derivative and a histidinamide derivative according to the complex stability constant of manganese, cobalt and the like, which are targets.
Extraction Method for Valuable Metals
To extract valuable metal ions using an extraction agent synthesized by the above method, with an acid aqueous solution comprising the objective valuable metal ions being adjusted, the acid aqueous solution is added to an organic solution of the above extraction agent, and mixed. Therefore, the objective valuable metal ions can be selectively extracted in the organic phase.
The organic solvent after extraction of the valuable metal ions is collected, and to this, a starting solution for back extraction is added and stirred to separate the objective valuable metal ions by extraction to an organic solvent, which starting solution is adjusted to a pH lower than that of the above acid aqueous solution. The objective valuable metal ions can be further retrieved from the organic solvent in an aqueous solution by back extraction of the objective valuable metal ions. As a solution for back extraction, for example, an aqueous solution in which nitric acid, hydrochloric acid or sulfuric acid is diluted is suitably used. In addition, the objective valuable metal ions can be concentrated by suitably changing the ratio of the organic phase and the aqueous phase.
Any organic solvent can be used, as long as an extraction agent and the extracted species of metals are dissolved with the solvent, and examples thereof include chlorine-based solvents such as chloroform and dichloromethane, aromatic hydrocarbons such as benzene, toluene and xylene, aliphatic hydrocarbons such as hexane, and the like. These organic solvents can be used individually, or two or more organic solvents can be mixed, and alcohols such as 1-octanol can be mixed therewith.
The concentration of the extraction agent can be properly set depending on the types and concentrations of valuable metals. In addition, the equilibrium arrival time varies depending on the types and concentrations of valuable metals and the amounts of extraction agent to be added, and thus the stirring time and extraction temperature can be suitably set depending on the conditions of an acid aqueous solution of valuable metal ions and an organic solution of the extraction agent. The pH of an acid aqueous solution comprising metal ions can be also suitably adjusted depending on the types of valuable metal.
Extraction of Cobalt
When cobalt is efficiently retrieved from an acid aqueous solution containing cobalt and manganese, any amino derivative of the above amino derivatives can be used as an extraction agent. Among these, it is preferred to use an N-methylglycine derivative or a histidinamide derivative since the suitable pH range is wide and thus the convenience is greater when cobalt is industrially extracted. Regarding pH, it is preferred that, with the pH of an acid aqueous solution comprising cobalt and manganese adjusted to 3.5 or more and 5.5 or less, an organic solution of an extraction agent be added thereto, and it is more preferred that, with the above pH adjusted to 4.0 or more and 5.0 or less, an organic solution of an extraction agent be added thereto. When the pH is less than 3.5, there is a possibility that cobalt cannot be sufficiently extracted depending on the types of extraction agent. When the pH is above 5.5, there is a possibility that not only cobalt but also manganese is extracted depending on the types of extraction agent.
Extraction of Europium
To efficiently retrieve europium from an acid aqueous solution containing a plurality of types of rare earth metal such as europium and yttrium and zinc, it is preferred that with the pH of the acid aqueous solution adjusted to 2.0 or more and 3.0 or less, an organic solution of an extraction agent be added thereto. The pH less than 2.0 is not preferred because europium cannot be sufficiently extracted. The pH above 3.0 is not preferred because not only europium but also other rare earth metals such as yttrium are extracted.
Selective Extraction of Rare Earth Elements
The extraction agent of the present invention is characterized by more easily extracting light rare earth elements and middle rare earth elements than heavy rare earth elements as compared to a conventionally known extraction agent, DODGAA. Because of this, especially, with the pH of a solution containing both heavy rare earth elements and light rare earth elements being adjusted, the solution is brought into contact with the extraction agent of the present invention to extract the light rare earth elements from the solution. The heavy rare earth elements can be separated by distribution in liquid after extraction. In addition, for a solution also containing middle rare earth elements, light rare earth elements and middle rare earth elements can be separated by again bringing DODGAA into contact with a solution obtained by back extraction of the above extraction agent.
To efficiently retrieve light rare earth elements from an acid solution containing heavy rare earth elements and light rare earth elements, it is preferred that with the pH of an acid aqueous solution comprising heavy rare earth elements and light rare earth elements adjusted to 1.7 or more and 2.7 or less, an organic solution of an extraction agent be added thereto. It is more preferred that with the above pH adjusted to 1.9 or more and 2.5 or less, an organic solution of an extraction agent be added thereto, and it is further preferred that with the above pH adjusted to 2.1 or more and 2.4 or less, an organic solution of an extraction agent be added thereto. The pH less than 1.7 is not preferred because there is a possibility that heavy rare earth elements and light rare earth elements are not completely separated, and consequently, the light rare earth elements cannot be sufficiently extracted. The pH above 2.7 is not preferred because not only light rare earth elements but also heavy rare earth elements are extracted, and consequently, selectivity of rare earth elements is lowered.
The mechanism in which the extraction agent of the present invention has an extraction behavior different from conventional extraction agents is not accurately grasped, and it is thought that the effects which conventional extraction agents do not have are obtained by the structural characteristics of the extraction agent of the present invention.
EXAMPLES
The present invention will now be described in more detail by way of examples. It should be noted, however, that the present invention is not restricted to these descriptions.
Example 1
Synthesis of Glycinamide Derivatives
As an example of amide derivatives forming an extraction agent, a glycinamide derivative represented by the following general formula (I) was synthesized, that is, N—[N,N-bis(2-ethylhexyl)aminocarbonylmethyl]glycine (or also referred to as N,N-di(2-ethylhexyl)acetamide-2-glycine), hereinafter referred to as “D2EHAG”), into which two 2-ethylhexyl groups were introduced.
D2EHAG was synthesized as follows. First, as shown in the following reaction formula (II), 23.1 g (0.1 mol) of commercially available di(2-ethylhexyl)amine and 10.1 g (0.1 mol) of triethylamine were collected. These were dissolved by adding chloroform, and 13.5 g (0.12 mol) of 2-chloroacetyl chloride was then added by drops thereto, followed by washing with 1 mol/l hydrochloric acid once. After this, washing was carried out with ion exchanged water and the chloroform phase was collected.
Next, anhydrous sodium sulfate was added in a suitable amount (approximately 10 to 20 g) for dehydration, followed by filtration to obtain 29.1 g of yellow liquid. When the structure of this yellow liquid (reaction product) was identified using a nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer (NMR), the above yellow liquid was confirmed to have the structure of 2-chloro-N,N-di(2-ethylhexyl)acetamide (hereinafter referred to as “CDEHAA”). The percent yield of CDEHAA was 90% relative to di(2-ethylhexyl)amine, a raw material.




Next, as shown in the following reaction formula (III), 8.0 g (0.2 mol) of sodium hydroxide was dissolved by adding methanol, and 15.01 g (0.2 mol) of glycine was further added thereto. While stirring the obtained solution, 12.72 g (0.04 mol) of the above CDEHAA was slowly added by drops thereto and stirred. After completion of stirring, the solvent in the reaction liquid was distilled off, and the residue was dissolved by adding chloroform. To this solution, 1 mol/1 sulphuric acid was added for acidification, followed by washing with ion exchanged water, and the chloroform phase was collected.
To this chloroform phase, anhydrous magnesium sulphate was added in a suitable amount for dehydration, followed by filtration. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure again to obtain 12.5 g of yellow paste. The percent yield based on the amount of the above CDEHAA was 87%. When the structure of the yellow paste was identified by NMR and elemental analysis, the paste was confirmed to have the structure of D2EHAG as shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2. The above steps were carried out to obtain a valuable metal extraction agent of Example 1.




Example 2
Synthesis of N-Methylglycine Derivatives
As another example of amide derivatives forming an extraction agent, an N-methylglycine derivative represented by the following general formula (I) was synthesized, that is, N—[N,N-bis(2-ethylhexyl)aminocarbonylmethyl]sarcosine (or also referred to as N,N-di(2-ethylhexyl)acetamide-2-sarcosine), hereinafter referred to as “D2EHAS”), into which two 2-ethylhexyl groups were introduced.
D2EHAS was synthesized as follows. As shown in the following reaction formula (IV), 5.3 g (0.132 mol) of sodium hydroxide was dissolved by adding methanol, and 11.8 g (0.132 mol) of sarcosine (N-methylglycine) was also added thereto. While stirring the obtained solution, 36.3 g (0.12 mol) of the above CDEHAA was slowly added by drops thereto and stirred. After completion of stirring, the solvent in the reaction liquid was distilled off, and the residue was dissolved by adding chloroform. To this solution, 1 mol/l sulphuric acid was added for acidification, followed by washing with ion exchanged water, and the chloroform phase was collected.
To this chloroform phase, anhydrous magnesium sulphate was added in a suitable amount for dehydration, followed by filtration. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure again to obtain 26.8 g of yellowish brown paste. The percent yield based on the amount of the above CDEHAA was 60%. When the structure of the yellow paste was identified by NMR and elemental analysis, the paste was confirmed to have the structure of D2EHAS. The above steps were carried out to obtain a valuable metal extraction agent of Example 2.




Example 3
Synthesis of Histidinamide Derivatives
As another example of amide derivatives forming an extraction agent, a histidinamide derivative represented by the following general formula (I) was synthesized, that is, N—[N,N-bis(2-ethylhexyl)aminocarbonylmethyl]histidine (or also referred to as N,N-di(2-ethylhexyl)acetamide-2-histidine), hereinafter referred to as “D2EHAH”), into which two 2-ethylhexyl groups were introduced.
D2EHAH was synthesized as follows. As shown in the following reaction formula (V), 16 g (0.4 mol) of sodium hydroxide was dissolved by adding methanol, and 31.0 g (0.2 mol) of histidine was also added thereto. While stirring the obtained solution, 13.2 g (0.04 mol) of the above CDEHAA was slowly added by drops thereto. After completion of the drop-by-drop addition, stirring was carried out with alkaline conditions maintained. After completion of stirring, the solvent in the reaction liquid was distilled off, and the residue was dissolved by adding ethyl acetate. This solution was washed, and the ethyl acetate phase was collected.
To this ethyl acetate phase, anhydrous magnesium sulphate was added in a suitable amount for dehydration, followed by filtration. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure again to obtain 9.9 g of yellowish brown paste. The percent yield based on the amount of the above CDEHAA was 57%. When the structure of the yellowish brown paste was identified by NMR and elemental analysis, the paste was confirmed to have the structure of D2EHAH. The above steps were carried out to obtain a valuable metal extraction agent of Example 3.




Comparative Example 1
As a valuable metal extraction agent of Comparative Example 1, a commercially available carboxylic acid-based cobalt extraction agent (Product name: VA-10, neodecanoic acid, manufactured by Hexion Specialty Chemicals Japan) was used.
Comparative Example 2
As a valuable metal extraction agent of Comparative Example 2, N,N-dioctyl-3-oxapentan-1,5-amic acid (hereinafter referred to as “DODGAA”), a conventionally known europium extraction agent, was used.
DODGAA was synthesized as follows. First, as shown in the following reaction formula (VI), 4.2 g of anhydrous diglycolic acid was put into a round bottom flask, and 40 ml of dichloromethane was put therein and suspended. After that, 7 g of dioctylamine (purity 98%) was dissolved in 10 ml of dichloromethane, and the obtained solution was slowly added thereto using a dropping funnel. While stirring the obtained solution at room temperature, the solution was confirmed to become clear by the reaction of anhydrous diglycolic acid, and the reaction was completed.




Subsequently, the above solution was washed with water to remove water-soluble impurities. After washing with water, sodium sulphate was added to the solution as a dehydrating agent. The solution was subjected to suction filtration, and the solvent was then vaporized. Recrystallization was carried out with hexane (three times), followed by vacuum drying. The yield of the obtained substance was 9.57 g, and the percent yield based on the above anhydrous diglycolic acid was 94.3%. When the structure of the obtained substance was identified by NMR and elemental analysis, the substance was confirmed to be DODGAA with a purity of 99% or more.
Extraction of Cobalt
Cobalt was extracted and separated using the valuable metal extraction agents of Examples 1 to 3 and Comparative Example 1.
Examples 1 to 3
Several types of acid solution of sulphuric acid comprising cobalt and manganese each in an amount of 1×10-4 mol/l and being adjusted to pH 2.5 to 7.5, and an equal volume of an n-dodecane solution comprising 0.01 mol/l of a valuable metal extraction agent were added together in test tubes, and the test tubes were put into a constant temperature oven at 25° C. and shaken for 24 hours. At this time, the pH of the sulphuric acid solution was adjusted using 0.1 mol/l sulphuric acid, ammonium sulphate and ammonia.
After shaking, the aqueous phase was collected, and the cobalt concentration and the manganese concentration were measured using inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). The organic phase was subjected to back extraction using 1 mol/l sulphuric acid. The cobalt concentration and the manganese concentration in the back extraction phase were measured using ICP-AES. From these measurement results, the extraction rates of cobalt and manganese were defined as the amount of material in the organic phase/(the amount of material in the organic phase+the amount of material in the aqueous phase) and measured. The results of the use of the valuable metal extraction agent of Example 1 are shown in FIG. 3, the results of the use of the valuable metal extraction agent of Example 2 are shown in FIG. 4, and the results of the use of the valuable metal extraction agent of Example 3 are shown in FIG. 5. In FIGS. 3 to 5, the abscissa is the pH of an acid solution of sulphuric acid, and the ordinate is the extraction rate (unit: %) of cobalt or manganese. In the graphs, the square indicates the extraction rate of cobalt and the circle indicates the extraction rate of manganese.
Comparative Example 1
Cobalt was extracted by the same method as in the Examples except that the pH of an acid solution of sulphuric acid was adjusted to 4.0 to 7.5 and the concentration of the n-dodecane solution comprising the valuable metal extraction agent was changed to 0.1 mol/l, which is ten times the concentration in the Examples. The results are shown in FIG. 6. In FIG. 6, the abscissa is the pH of an acid solution of sulphuric acid, and the ordinate is the extraction rate (unit: %) of cobalt or manganese. In the graph, the square indicates the extraction rate of cobalt and the diamond indicates the extraction rate of manganese.
It was recognized that by using the valuable metal extraction agents of the Examples, cobalt could be extracted at an extraction rate of at least above 20% in a pH range of 3.0 or more to 5.5 or less (FIG. 3 to FIG. 5). In particular, it was recognized that by using an N-methylglycine derivative or a histidinamide derivative, the suitable pH range was wide, and convenience was greater when industrially carrying out the cobalt extraction of the present invention (FIG. 4, FIG. 5). It was also recognized that cobalt could be extracted at an extraction rate of above 80% and manganese was hardly extracted in a pH range of 4.0 or more to 5.0 or less regardless of the types of derivative (FIG. 3 to FIG. 5). Meanwhile, it was recognized that by using the valuable metal extraction agent of Comparative Example 1, cobalt could be extracted only at an extraction rate of less than 20% even when the concentration of the extraction agent was ten times that in the Examples (FIG. 6).
Extraction of Europium
Europium was extracted and separated by using the valuable metal extraction agents of Example 1 and Comparative Example 2.
Example 1
Several types of acid solution comprising yttrium, europium and zinc each in an amount of 1×10-4 mol/l and being adjusted to pH 1 to 4, and an equal volume of an n-dodecane solution comprising 0.01 mol/l of the valuable metal extraction agent were added together in test tubes, and the test tubes were put into a constant temperature oven at 25° C. and shaken for 24 hours. At this time, the pH of an acid solution was adjusted using 0.1 mol/l nitric acid, acetic acid and sodium acetate.
After shaking, the aqueous phase was collected, and the yttrium concentration, the europium concentration and the zinc concentration were measured using ICP-AES. The organic phase was subjected to back extraction using 1 mol/l nitric acid. The yttrium concentration, the europium concentration and the zinc concentration in the back extraction phase were measured using ICP-AES. From these measurement results, the extraction rates of yttrium, europium and zinc were defined as the amount of material in the organic phase/(the amount of material in the organic phase+the amount of material in the aqueous phase) and measured. The results are shown in FIG. 7. In FIG. 7, the abscissa is the pH of an acid solution, and the ordinate is the extraction rate of yttrium, europium and zinc.
Comparative Example 2
Europium was extracted by the same method as in the Example except that the pH of an acid solution of sulphuric acid was adjusted to 1.2 to 2.2. The results are shown in FIG. 8.
It was recognized that by using the valuable metal extraction agent of the Example, europium could be extracted at an extraction rate of at least above 40% in a pH range of 2.0 or more to 3.0 or less and a significant difference between the extraction rate of europium and the extraction rate of yttrium could be found (FIG. 7). Meanwhile, it was recognized that by using the valuable metal extraction agent of Comparative Example 2, europium could be extracted at a high extraction rate, but yttrium was also extracted at a high extraction rate, and thus europium and yttrium could not be separated (FIG. 8).
Thus, it was recognized that cobalt could be efficiently retrieved from used secondary batteries, and europium and yttrium could be efficiently separated and retrieved from three band fluorescent lamps and cathode ray tubes using a valuable metal extraction agent comprising an amide derivative represented by the following general formula (I):




(wherein, R1 and R2 each represent the same or different alkyl groups;
the alkyl group can be a straight chain or a branched chain;
R3 represents a hydrogen atom or an alkyl group; and
R4 represents a hydrogen atom or any group other than an amino group, which is bound to the α carbon as an amino acid).
Extraction of Light Rare Earth Metals
Light rare earth metals were extracted and separated from an acid solution containing a plurality of types of rare earth metal using the valuable metal extraction agent of Example 1.
Several types of acid solution of nitric acid comprising lanthan (La) and cesium (Ce), light rare earth metals, and thulium (Tm) and ytterbium (Yb), heavy rare earth metals, each in an amount of 1×10-4 mol/l and being adjusted to pH 1.1 to 3.4, and an equal volume of an n-dodecane solution comprising 0.01 mol/l of the valuable metal extraction agent were added together in test tubes, and the test tubes were put into a constant temperature oven at 25° C. and shaken for 24 hours. At this time, the pH of the acid solution was adjusted using 0.1 mol/l nitric acid, ammonium nitrate and ammonia.
After shaking, the aqueous phase was collected, and the concentration of each rare earth metal was measured using ICP-AES. The organic phase was subjected to back extraction using 2 mol/l nitric acid. The concentration of each rare earth metal in the back extraction phase was measured using ICP-AES. From these measuring results, the extraction rate of each rare earth metal was defined as the amount of material in the organic phase/(the amount of material in the organic phase+the amount of material in the aqueous phase) and measured. The results are shown in FIG. 9. In FIG. 9, the abscissa is the pH of the acid solution, and the ordinate is the extraction rate of rare earth metals.
It was recognized that by using the valuable metal extraction agent of the Example, light rare earth metals could be selectively extracted from an acid solution containing a plurality of types of rare earth metal in a pH range of 1.7 or more to 2.7 or less (FIG. 9). In particular, it was recognized that light rare earth metals could be extracted at an extraction rate of above 30%, and heavy rare earth metals were hardly extracted in a pH range of 1.9 or more to 2.5 or less (FIG. 9). It was also recognized that light rare earth metals could be extracted at an extraction rate of above 50%, and the extraction rates of heavy rare earth metals were significantly low as compared to the extraction rates of light rare earth metals in a pH range of 2.1 or more to 2.4 or less.
When the valuable metal extraction agent of Comparative Example 2 was used, heavy rare earth metals were extracted in preference to light rare earth metals, and thus it cannot be said that light rare earth metals could be extracted with as high an efficiency as the valuable metal extraction agents of the Examples.

## Claims

1. An extraction agent for europium or light rare earths, comprising an amide derivative represented by the following general formula (I):




wherein, R1 and R2 each represent the same or different alkyl groups;
the alkyl group is optionally a straight chain or a branched chain;
R3 represents a hydrogen atom or an alkyl group; and
R4 represents a hydrogen atom or functional group other than an amino group.

2. The extraction agent according to claim 1, wherein the amide derivative is any one or more of glycinamide derivatives, histidinamide derivatives, lysinamide derivatives, aspartic acid amide derivatives and N-methylglycine derivatives.

3. A europium extraction method, wherein an acid solution containing rare earth metals and zinc is subjected to solvent extraction by an extraction agent according to claim 1 to extract europium from the acid solution.

4. The europium extraction method according to claim 3, wherein the acid solution is subjected to the solvent extraction with the pH of the acid solution adjusted to a range of 2.0 to 3.0.

5. The europium extraction method according to claim 3, wherein the rare earth metals include europium and yttrium.

6. An extraction method for light rare earth metals, wherein an acid solution containing light rare earth metals and heavy rare earth metals is subjected to solvent extraction by an extraction agent according to claim 1 to extract the light rare earth metals from the acid solution.

7. The extraction method for light rare earth metals according to claim 6, wherein the acid solution is subjected to the solvent extraction with the pH of the acid solution adjusted to a range of 1.7 to 2.7.

8. A europium extraction method, wherein an acid solution containing rare earth metals and zinc is subjected to solvent extraction by an extraction agent according to claim 2 to extract europium from the acid solution.

9. The europium extraction method according to claim 8, wherein the acid solution is subjected to the solvent extraction with the pH of the acid solution adjusted to a range of 2.0 to 3.0.

10. The europium extraction method according to claim 4, wherein the rare earth metals include europium and yttrium.

11. The europium extraction method according to claim 8, wherein the rare earth metals include europium and yttrium.

12. The europium extraction method according to claim 9, wherein the rare earth metals include europium and yttrium.

13. An extraction method for light rare earth metals, wherein an acid solution containing light rare earth metals and heavy rare earth metals is subjected to solvent extraction by an extraction agent according to claim 2 to extract the light rare earth metals from the acid solution.

14. The extraction method for light rare earth metals according to claim 13, wherein the acid solution is subjected to the solvent extraction with the pH of the acid solution adjusted to a range of 1.7 to 2.7.

15. The extraction agent according to claim 1, wherein the light rare earths are selected from the group consisting of promethium, neodymium, praseodymium, cerium, and lanthanum.

16. The extraction method for light rare earth metals according to claim 6, wherein:
the light rare earth metals are selected from the group consisting of promethium, neodymium, praseodymium, cerium, and lanthanum; and
the heavy rare earth metals are selected from the group consisting of yttrium, lutetium, ytterbium, thulium, erbium, and holmium.

17. The extraction method for light rare earth metals according to claim 13, wherein:
the light rare earth metals are selected from the group consisting of promethium, neodymium, praseodymium, cerium, and lanthanum; and
the heavy rare earth metals are selected from the group consisting of yttrium, lutetium, ytterbium, thulium, erbium, and holmium.