alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,446
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,948
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     64,676
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        387,325
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 484,610
<DEPOSITS>                                     332,193
<SHORT-TERM>                                    72,936
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,507
<LONG-TERM>                                     44,438
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 484,610
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,397
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,659
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   170
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,226
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,706
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,662
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,564
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    (403)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  30
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,177
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,654
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.43
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       759
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,454
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      113
<RECOVERIES>                                        43
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   23
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,477
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

In connection with the
Annual Report of iPass Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven H. Gatoff, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 15, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    STEVEN H.
GATOFF                                                                                        
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Steven H. Gatoff Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is
not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of iPass Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 65866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28101]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: December 5-6, 2000.
    Time: 8:00 am to 5:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Chevy Chase Holiday Inn, Terrace Room, 5520 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Scott F. Andres, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 
6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E03, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 25, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-28101 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
(LOGO)
                                    KNUTSON
                              MORTGAGE CORPORATION

                              REPORT OF MANAGEMENT

We, as members of  management  of  Temple-Inland  Financial  Services, Inc., and
Subsidiaries  (including  Knutson  Mortgage  Corporation)  (the  "Company")  are
responsible for complying with the minimum  servicing  standards as set forth in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM
FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS (the "USAP").  We are also responsible for establishing and
maintaining effective internal control over compliance with these standards.  We
have  performed  an  evaluation  of the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum
servicing standards as set forth in the USAP as of December 31, 1997 and for the
15 month period then ended. Based on this evaluation,  we assert that during the
15 month period ended December 31, 1997, the Company  complied,  in all material
respects, with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the USAP.

During  the 15 month  period  ended  December  31,  1997,  the  Company  did not
consistently  document its supervisory  review and approval of custodial account
reconciliations.  Although  not  consistently  documented,  in most  instances a
supervisory  review had taken place. As of January 1998, a procedure to document
supervisory  review and  approval  had been  instituted.  Because a  supervisory
review  was  made  in  most  instances,  we  believe  this  is  not  a  material
noncompliance with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the USAP.

As of December  31, 1997,  the Company had in effect a fidelity  bond and errors
and omissions policy in the amount of $30,000,000.


By:/s/Richard Hebl
Senior Vice President -
         Loan Administration


    3001 METRO DRIVE/SUITE 400/ MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55425/(612) 204-2600
#### SMITH v. STATE.

No. 23238.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 5, 1945.

' Thos. R. ‘-Bond-and-Mor-r-is: Briny 'both of-Terrell, for appellant;-' ■ ■ : '

*831Fred V. Meridith, Co. Atty., and Robert K. Ramsey, Asst. Co. Atty., both of Terrell, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of unlawfully carrying- a pistol, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the county jail for a period of six months.

Appellant seriously contends that the evidence is insufficient to justify and sustain his conviction. With this contention we are inclined to agree. The record discloses that appellant was running a grocery and restaurant business in the town of Terrell in Kaufman County; that on the night in question he closed his place of business about 9:30 p.m., and started home in his automobile. During the day he had collected approximately $100 which he put in his pocket. As he started to go home; he put a pistol in his belt. About the time that he had gotten into his automobile, the officers appeared on the scene. They pulled him out of his car, searched him and found a pistol on his person. At the time they pulled him out of his automobile, he said he was going home.

Appellant testified that the pistol had. been in his place of business for about six months; that he-had not been in the habit of carrying it from his place of business to his home dr from his home to his place of business. This is not controverted by any fact or circumstance. Appellant'had a right to carry a pistol from his place -of business to his home, just as much’so as if he had carried it from a repair shop or from a pawnbroker shop to his home, so long as he did not do it habitually. This case is parallel to that of Bowles v. State, 66 Tex.Cr.R. 550, 147 S.W. 869; The evidence in this case is very similar 'to that adduced on the trial of that case. Upon the authority of that case, we think this case should be reversed and reminded. See also Kellum v. State, 66 Tex.Cf.R. 505, 147 S.W. 870; Mathonican v. State, 51 Tex.Cr.R. 471, 102 S.W. 1123; Huff v. State, 51 Tex.Cr.R. 441, 102 S.W. 407:

Many other complaints are brought forward relating to the admission of extraneous misdemeanor cases which are not relevant .to.-the case on trial,-but.in .view -of'the..disposition we .are making; of this case, we deem it unnecessary to discuss the same at length.

It occurs to ’us that the County Attorney failed to distinguish the difference between evidence which tends to affect the credibility of the accused as a witness and that which shows his general reputation. The charge of the court complained of singles out appellant’s testimony and is a comment on the weight thereof.

From what we have said it follows that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded, and it is so ordered.

PER CURIAM. ■

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by .the Judges, of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In
connection with the Annual Report of CLP Holdings Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter P. W.
Tse, Group Executive Director & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 16, 2004



By:

/s/ Peter P. W. TsePeter P. W. Tse Group Executive Director & Chief Financial Officer










|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 13.5



     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
Annual Report on December 31, 2003 for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
"Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code.

Federici Guedes, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
Localiza Master Franchisee Argentina S.A., certifies that, to the best of his
respective knowledge:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Localiza
     Master Franchisee Argentina S.A


Belo Horizonte, June 29, 2004


                               By:      /s/ Federici Guedes
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Federici Guedes
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Principal  Financial Officer
                                       Date:  June 29, 2004
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Click2learn, Inc., on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K/A), I, Kevin M. Oakes, Chief Executive Officer and I, John D. Atherly, Chief Financial Officer, of Click2learn, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Form 10-K/A
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Click2learn, Inc.



Dated:  February
10, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    KEVIN M.
OAKES  
|Kevin M. Oakes         
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/    JOHN D.
ATHERLY 
|John D. Atherly        
|Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of *SOURCECORP*,Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that:

 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004(the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  August 9, 2004 | /s/  Ed H. Bowman, Jr.                 |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                        | Ed  H. Bowman, Jr.                     |
|                        | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).

 

----
#### Ex parte WHEAT.

No. 22586.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 16, 1943.

E. T. Branch and H. E. Kahn, both of Houston, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

This is an original writ of habeas corpus issued by this court on May 31, 1943.

The relator seeks his discharge from the state penitentiary where he is now confined under a conviction for the offense of robbery by firearms in the District Court of Jackson County, which conviction was had on the 6th day of October, 1937. In this conviction the jury found the defendant guilty of robbery by firearms, as charged in the indictment and as submitted by the court’s charge, and fixed his punishment at life in the penitentiary. He seeks his discharge on the ground that he has now served the minimum term of five years and that all of the sentence in excess of five years was void because the statute allows the penalty of a term of years in the penitentiary, and the sentence of life is not permissible under the statute.

Roy Wheat, relator, was indicted jointly with E. C. Erwin for robbery by the use of firearms. Erwin was discharged from further confinement in the penitentiary because the punishment of life imprisonment in the penitentiary was void under the statute which did not authorize such punishment. See Art. 1408, P.C.; Ex parte Erwin, Tex.Cr.App., 170 S.W.2d 226.

Relator here as in Erwin’s case has. served the minimum time of five years, and is entitled to his discharge for the same reasons set out in the opinion in Erwin’s, case.

The relator is ordered discharged from, further custody under the judgment of conviction for robbery by the use of firearms in the District Court of Jackson. County on October 6, 1937.
AO 399 (01/09) Waiver of the Service of Summons 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC 

Plaintiff 

V. 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION 

Defendant 

for the 

Western District of Texas 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 6:20-CV-458-ADA 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: James L. Etheridge, Esq. 

(Name of the plaintiff's attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, 

two copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court's 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 06/05/2020 , the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the 

United States). If I fail to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: 06/05/2020 

MICROSOFT CORPORATION 

Printed name of party waiving service of summons 

Barry K. Shelton 

Printed name 

Shelton Coburn LLP 

311 RR 620 S, Suite 205 

Austin, TX 78734 

Address 

bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com 

E-mail address

(512) 263-2165

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons 

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a summons 

and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff located in 

the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

"Good cause'' does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant's property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections. but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the plaintiff 

and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been served. 

Case 6:20-cv-00458-ADA Document 9 Filed 06/05/20 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                             CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Hyperdynamics  Corporation
(Hyperdynamics)  ,  on  Form  10-Q  for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Steven M.
Plumb,  Chief  Financial Officer of Hyperdynamics, does hereby certify, pursuant
to   906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002 (18 U.S.C.   1350), that to his
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.


Date:  November  21,  2005

By:  /s/  Steven  M.  Plumb
      -----------------
      Steven  M.  Plumb
      Chief  Financial  Officer