alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification**

I, Andrew S. Prince, certify that:

 

- I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Precision AerospaceComponents, Inc. (the “Company”);

 

- Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

- Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

- As the Company’s sole certifying officer, I am responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe Company and have:

 

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;
 and
Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

- As the Company’s sole certifying officer, I have disclosed, basedon my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committeeof the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/ Andrew S. Prince

 

Andrew S. Prince

    Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 14, 2012
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3458 

To treat payments by charitable organizations with respect to certain 

firefighters as exempt payments. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2013 

Ms. SLAUGHTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To treat payments by charitable organizations with respect 

to certain firefighters as exempt payments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallen Firefighters As5 sistance Tax Clarification Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PAYMENTS BY CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS WITH 

7 RESPECT TO CERTAIN FIREFIGHTERS TREAT8 ED AS EXEMPT PAYMENTS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the Internal Rev10 enue Code of 1986, payments made to— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3458 IH

1 (1) any firefighter who was injured as a result 

2 of the ambush of firefighters responding to an emer3 gency on December 24, 2012, in Webster, New 

4 York, 

5 (2) the spouse of any firefighter who died as a 

6 result of such ambush, or 

7 (3) any dependent (as defined in section 152 of 

8 such Code) of any firefighter who died as a result 

9 of such ambush, 

10 by an organization described in paragraph (1) or (2) of 

11 section 509(a) of such Code shall be treated as related 

12 to the purpose or function constituting the basis for such 

13 organization’s exemption under section 501 of such Code 

14 if such payments are made in good faith using a reason15 able and objective formula which is consistently applied. 

16 (b) APPLICATION.—Subsection (a) shall apply only to 

17 payments made on or after December 24, 2012, and be18 fore the later of— 

19 (1) January 1, 2014, or 

20 (2) the date which is 30 days after the date of 

21 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7586

JAMES EUGENE VENABLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

T. WILSON, JR., Lieutenant; G. L. BASS, Warden; MR. UNDERWOOD, Medical Administration,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

JIMM WEBSTER,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-94-405)

Submitted: August 27, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Eugene Venable, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Leonard Taylor,

Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's judgment entered in

favor of Defendant Wilson on the verdict returned by a jury. We

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order does

not dispose of all Defendants and is not appealable. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither

a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
null

100.06213
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          61,125
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         289,507
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               281,100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               441,644
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    613,621
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        821,197
<ALLOWANCE>                                     18,528
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,148,123
<DEPOSITS>                                     870,004
<SHORT-TERM>                                   492,816
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            256,337
<LONG-TERM>                                    870,412
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,010
<COMMON>                                           260
<OTHER-SE>                                     557,284
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,148,123
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 71,842
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               48,892
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               120,734
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              48,730
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,041
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,963
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   40,806
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (42,975)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                338,838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                410,805
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     410,805
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   428,257
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    14.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    13.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    1.16
<LOANS-NON>                                     37,198
<LOANS-PAST>                                        75
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               137,773
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   47,157
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,238
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               18,528
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            14,794
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,734
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTIONS
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Warning Management Services, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Randall Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
















/s/
      Randall Jones


_____________________________


Randall
      Jones


Chief
      Financial Officer


June
      15,
      2005
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3487 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act to extend through 2018 the 

authority of the Federal Election Commission to impose civil money 

penalties on the basis of a schedule of penalties established and published 

by the Commission, to expand such authority to certain other violations, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2013 

Mrs. MILLER of Michigan (for herself, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. HARPER, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. NUGENT, Mr. 

ROKITA, Mr. SCHOCK, and Mr. VARGAS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act to extend 

through 2018 the authority of the Federal Election Commission to impose civil money penalties on the basis 

of a schedule of penalties established and published by 

the Commission, to expand such authority to certain 

other violations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3487 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY AU2 THORITY OF FEDERAL ELECTION COMMIS3 SION THROUGH 2018. 

4 Section 309(a)(4)(C)(iv) of the Federal Election 

5 Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(4)(C)(iv)) is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘December 31, 2018’’. 

8 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY AU9 THORITY OF FEDERAL ELECTION COMMIS10 SION. 

11 (a) APPLICATION TO QUALIFIED DISCLOSURE RE12 QUIREMENTS.—Section 309(a)(4)(C)(i) of the Federal 

13 Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 

14 437g(a)(4)(C)(i)) is amended by striking ‘‘any require15 ment of section 304(a) of the Act (2 U.S.C. 434(a))’’ and 

16 inserting ‘‘a qualified disclosure requirement’’. 

17 (b) SCHEDULE OF PENALTIES FOR EACH VIOLA18 TION.—Section 309(a)(4)(C)(i)(II) of the Federal Elec19 tion Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 

20 437g(a)(4)(C)(i)(II)) is amended by inserting ‘‘, for viola21 tions of each qualified disclosure requirement,’’ before 

22 ‘‘under a schedule of penalties’’. 

23 (c) DEFINITION OF QUALIFIED DISCLOSURE RE24 QUIREMENT.—Section 309(a)(4)(C) of the Federal Elec25 tion Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(4)(C)) is 

26 amended— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3487 IH

1 (1) by redesignating clause (iv), as amended by 

2 section 1, as clause (v); and 

3 (2) by inserting after clause (iii) the following 

4 new clause: 

5 ‘‘(iv) In this subparagraph, the term 

6 ‘qualified disclosure requirement’ means any re7 quirement of— 

8 ‘‘(I) subsections (a), (c), (e), (f), (g), 

9 or (i) of section 304; or 

10 ‘‘(II) section 305.’’. 

11 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

12 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 

13 on the earlier of— 

14 (1) December 31, 2013; or 

15 (2) the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Unassociated Document


    
      

    


    EXHIBIT
      10.9

    


    FIRST
      AMENDMENT TO ANHEUSER-BUSCH EXECUTIVE DEFERRED

    COMPENSATION
      PLAN

    (Amended
      and Restated as of January 1, 2002)

    


    In
      accordance with the provisions of Article IX of the Anheuser-Busch Executive
      Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended as
      follows:

    


    The
      following new
      Section 3.05 is hereby inserted immediately following Section 3.04, effective
      December 1, 2005.

    


    
      	
               

            	
              3.05.

            	
              Optional
                Cancellation of 2005 Deferrals. Notwithstanding anything herein to the
                contrary, a Participant shall have the right to cancel all or part
                of the
                Participant’s prior election to defer his or her Base Salary for the Year
                commencing January 1, 2005 in accordance with the Company’s direction
                (which direction shall include the requirement that the election
                to cancel
                be made on or before December 31, 2005). If the Participant exercises
                this
                right to cancel, the Company shall distribute (prior to January 1,
                2006)
                the applicable Deferral Amount cancelled pursuant to this Section
                3.05 and
                any related hypothetical investment credited to his or her Account
                as of
                November 30, 2005 (subject to appropriate withholding of taxes).
                Such
                election to cancel and resulting distribution under this Section
                3.05
                shall be made in conformance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
                Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 409A”), Internal Revenue Service Notice
                2005-1, and proposed Treasury Regulations issued under Section
                409A.

            


    

    


    IN
      WITNESS
      WHEREOF, Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. has executed this First
      Amendment this 13 day of December, 2005.

    


    


    ANHEUSER-BUSCH
      COMPANIES, INC.

    


    


    


    
      	
              By:
/s/
                W.
                Randolph
                Baker            
                
     W. Randolph
                Baker
     Chief Financial
                Officer
#### SHERYL SHEEHAN *v.*ALAN BALASIC

(SC 15818)

Berdon, Norcott, Katz, Palmer and McDonald, Js.

Argued April 21

officially released June 23, 1998

*149
      *James K. Filan, Jr.,*with whom, on the biief, was *Stuart Bear,*for the appellant (defendant).

*David Battat,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.1

The appeal is dismissed.

**We granted the defendant’s petition for certification limited to the following issue: “Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the twenty-four month term of the unallocated alimony and support provision was not modifiable?” *Sheehan*v. *Balasic,*243 Conn. 945, 704 A.2d 798 (1997).
#### GOODWIN v. BEUTEL et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 27, 1953.

Raymond C. Arny, Louisville, for appellant.

Carl K. Helman, Louisville, for appel-lees.

STANLEY, Commissioner.

Upon the trial of a traverse from a judgment of guilty in a forcible detainer proceeding, the circuit court, upon submission of the law and facts, rendered a similar judgment. The tenant, Paul E. Goodwin, brings an appeal against the landlords, Clarence A. Beutel and Harold V. Beutel.

Under an oral agreement, the tenant entered into possession of the premises, a furnished apartment, on August 23, 1950. Clarence Beutel testified that Goodwin was “a monthly tenant” for an indefinite period, “as long as he paid his rent” of $60.00 a month in advance. He did not pay any of the rent due January 23, 1952. Without having given notice to vacate the premises, the landlords instituted the forcible detainer proceeding on February 11, 1952, in a magistrate’s court. The circuit court was of opinion, as we deduce from the briefs, that the tenant had terminated the lease by failing to pay the rent and was not entitled to the month’s notice to vacate the premises prescribed by KRS 383.140 for terminating a tenancy at will or by sufferance.

We do not follow the appellees’ argument that the tenant cannot take advantage of his own breach of the contract by having failed to pay the rent in advance, a prerequisite of occupancy, and that the *533statute only covers a situation where the landlord desires to terminate the contract by his own act of giving- notice. Nonpayment of rent on time may be, as in this case, a reason for the landlords’ desire to terminate the lease, hut it is not of itself a forfeiture in the absence of a specific stipulation. Estes v. Gatliff, 291 Ky. 93, 163 S.W.2d 273.

It seems to us that this case is clearly within the statute as being a tenancy at will because the terms were from month to month. With his usual felicity and logic, Judge Dietzman, for the court in Pack v. Feuchtenberger, 232 Ky. 267, 22 S.W.2d 914, noted the distinction between a lease “for one month,” as being for a definite period not requiring notice to vacate, and a lease “from month to month,” as requiring notice of the landlord’s election. The terms of that lease and the present one are the same except the amount of rental.

Upon the authority of :that case, the judgment is

Reversed.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket** Docket Number: F AA - 2012 - 0150 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM234AD

THALES C16291A - 34 - 007 --- 8/27/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 17

- 00604

- CR

Markus Lorenzo SCOTT

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR5941

Honorable Laura Lee Parker, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED December 12, 2018.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                              EXHIBIT 12


                                                               MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V
                                                                MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.
                                                                 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                                                   COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                                          (dollars in thousands)


                                                                                                             FOR THE PERIOD
                                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED                NOVEMBER 3, 1998
                                      DECEMBER 29, 2000                  DECEMBER 31, 1999               TO DECEMBER 25, 1998
                           ---------------------------------  ---------------------------------  ----------------------------------
                              MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                                 PREFERRED       PREFERRED          PREFERRED       PREFERRED        PREFERRED       PREFERRED
                            CAPITAL TRUST V  FUNDING  V,L.P.   CAPITAL TRUST V  FUNDING  V,L.P.   CAPITAL TRUST V  FUNDING  V, L.P.
                           ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ----------------

<S>                        <C>                 <C>            <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>

Earnings                       $ 63,795           $ 74,901        $ 63,795           $ 74,798         $ 10,101            $ 11,829
                               ========           ========        ========           ========         ========            ========


Fixed charges                  $      -           $      -        $      -           $      -         $      -            $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution
 requirements                    61,880             63,795          61,880             63,795            9,798              10,101
                               --------           --------        --------           --------         --------            --------

Total combined fixed
 charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirements                  $ 61,880           $ 63,795        $ 61,880           $ 63,795         $  9,798            $ 10,101
                               ========           ========        ========           ========         ========            ========

Ratio of earnings to
 combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements         1.03               1.17            1.03               1.17             1.03                1.17


</TABLE>