62402 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 18, 2000 / Notices

the amendment is contained in a Safety

Evaluation dated October 6, 2000.

No significant hazards consideration

comments received: No.

Union Electric Company, Docket No.

50–483, Callaway Plant, Unit 1,

Callaway County, Missouri

Date of application for amendment:

May 25, 2000 (ULNRC–04258).

Brief description of amendment: The

amendment expands (1) The range of

acceptable lift settings for the

pressurizer safety valves (PSVs), and (2)

the tolerance (from ±1% to ±2%) of the

as-found, measured lift settings of tested

PSVs, to be operable. Following testing,

however, the lift settings of the PSVs

would remain nor more than the current

±1%. The amendment revises Technical

Specifications (TS) 3.3.2, ‘‘Engineered

Safety Features Actuation System

(ESFAS) Instrumentation,’’ 3.4.10,

‘‘Pressurizer Safety Valves,’’ and 3.4.11,

‘‘Pressurizer Power Operated Relief

Valves (PORVs),’’ of the Callaway TS.

For TS 3.3.2, a new Action H for one or

more trains inoperable is added, the

note for surveillance requirement (SR)

3.3.2.14 is revised to identify another

slave relay that the SR would be

applicable to, and the automatic PORV

actuation is added to Table 3.3.2–1,

‘‘Engineered Safety Features Actuation

System Instrumentation.’’ For TS 3.4.10,

the range of allowable PSV lift settings

in the limiting condition for operation

(LCO) is expanded from ≥2460 and

≤2510 to ≥2411 and ≤2509, and SR

3.4.10.1 is revised to state that,

following testing, the lift settings shall

be ‘‘within 1% of 2460 psig’’ instead of

simply ‘‘within 1%.’’ The nominal PSV

lift setting would be changed from 2485

psig to 2460 psig. For TS 3.4.11, Actions

A and B is revised to be actions for

inoperable PORVs either solely due to

excessive PORV seat leakage (Action A)

or for reasons other than excessive seat

leakage (Action B), and Action E would

remain an action for two inoperable

PORVs, but would be only for reasons

other than excessive seat leakage.

Date of issuance: September 25, 2000.

Effective date: September 25, 2000, to

be implemented (including issuing the

revised EOP E–O and training all the

control room operator crews on the

revised procedure) before the restart

from refueling outage 11, the next

refueling outage for Callaway Plant,

Unit 1, scheduled to begin in Spring

2001.

Amendment No.: 137.

Facility Operating License No. NPF–

30: The amendment revised the

Technical Specifications.

Date of initial notice in Federal

Register: June 28, 2000 (65 FR 29964).

The Commission’s related evaluation of

the amendment is contained in a Safety

Evaluation dated September 25, 2000.

No significant hazards consideration

comments received: No.

Union Electric Company, Docket No.

50–483, Callaway Plant, Unit 1,

Callaway County, Missouri

Date of application for amendment:

July 21, 2000 (ULNRC–04285), as

supplemented August 16, 2000.

Brief description of amendment: The

amendment revises Limiting Condition

for Operation (LCO) 3.9.4,

‘‘Containment Penetrations,’’ of the

Callaway Technical Specifications (TS)

to allow containment penetrations with

direct access to the outside atmosphere

to be open under administrative

controls during refueling operations, by

adding a note to the LCO that states

‘‘containment penetration flow path(s)

providing direct access from the

containment atmosphere to the outside

atmosphere may be unisolated under

administrative controls.’’ In addition,

there is a format and editorial correction

to TS 3.8.3, ‘‘Diesel Fuel Oil, Lube Oil,

and Start Air,’’ to correct an error in the

conversion to the improved TS issued

May 28, 1999, in Amendment No. 133.

Date of issuance: September 26, 2000.

Effective date: September 26, 2000, to

be implemented (including the

completion of the administrative

procedures that ensure that open

containment penetrations, with direct

acess to the outside atmosphere during

refueling operations with core

alterations and irradiated fuel

movement inside containment, will be

promptly closed in the event of a fuel

handling accident inside containment)

before refueling operations during

refueling outage 11.

Amendment No.: 138.

Facility Operating License No. NPF–30:

The amendment revised the Technical

Specifications.

Date of initial notice in Federal

Register: August 23, 2000 (65 FR 51364).

The August 16, 2000, supplement

provided additional clarifying

information, did not expand the scope

of the application as originally noticed,

and did not change the staff’s original

proposed no significant hazards

consideration determination.

The Commission’s related evaluation

of the amendment is contained in a

Safety Evaluation dated September 26,

2000.

No significant hazards consideration

comments received: No.

Union Electric Company, Docket No.

50–483, Callaway Plant, Unit 1,

Callaway County, Missouri

Date of application for amendment:

September 8, 1999.

Brief description of amendment: The

amendment authorizes revisions to the

descriptions of the steam generator tube

rupture and main steam line break

accidents in the Callaway Plant, Unit 1

Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) to

reflect increases in the radiological dose

consequences calculated by the licensee

for these accidents.

Date of issuance: September 27, 2000.

Effective date: September 27, 2000, to

be implemented in the next periodic

update to the FSAR in accordance with

10 CFR 50.71(e). Implementation of the

amendment is the incorporation into the

FSAR the changes to the description of

the facility as described in the licensee’s

application dated September 8, 1999,

and evaluated in the staff’s Safety

Evaluation attached to the amendment.

Amendment No.: 139.

Facility Operating License No. NPF–30:

The amendment revised the Final Safety

Analysis Report.

Date of initial notice in Federal

Register: October 6, 1999 (64 FR 54383).

The Commission’s related evaluation of

the amendment is contained in a Safety

Evaluation dated September 27, 2000.

No significant hazards consideration

comments received: No.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day

of October 2000.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

John A. Zwolinski,

Director, Division of Licensing Project

Management. Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation.

[FR Doc. 00–26645 Filed 10–17–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

PRESIDIO TRUST

Presidio Theatre (Building 99), The

Presidio of San Francisco, California,

Notice of Termination of

Environmental Impact Statement

Process

AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.

ACTION: Notice of termination of

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

process for the rehabilitation and

expansion of the Presidio Theatre

(Building 99) within The Presidio of San

Francisco, San Francisco, California

(Presidio).

RATIONALE: The Presidio Trust (Trust) is

terminating the EIS process for the

Presidio Theatre in order to complete an

update of the 1994 General Management

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 18, 2000 / Notices 62403

1 15 U.S.C. 78l(d).

2 17 CFR 240.12d2–2(d).

3 15 U.S.C. 78l(g).

4 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(1).

Plan Amendment (GMPA) for Area B of

the Presidio and associated EIS as

noticed on June 30, 2000 (65 FR 40707–

40708) and amended on October 11,

2000 (65 FR 60477–60478). It is

expected that this plan update, known

as the Presidio Trust Implementation

Plan (PTIP) will provide a

comprehensive planning framework

within which future projects for the

Presidio would proceed. Following the

completion and adoption of the PTIP

and associated EIS and if appropriate

within the adopted comprehensive

planning framework, the Trust expects

to re-propose and reinitiate a project

related to the Presidio Theatre, and will

inform the public of its intent at that

later date. As a result of this notice of

termination, the Presidio Theatre project

is no longer being treated as an

assumption common to all alternatives

(i.e., as a ‘‘given’’) in the PTIP NEPA

process.

Background

On April 14, 2000, the Trust

announced in the Federal Register (65

FR 20218) its intention to prepare an

Environmental Assessment (EA) for

rehabilitating the existing 15,140-

square-foot Presidio Theatre and adding

up to 45,000 square feet of new

construction for theater uses, a

restaurant, retail museum and library

store (project). On May 10, 2000, the

Trust held a public scoping workshop to

solicit public comment regarding the

range of alternatives and the specific

impacts to be evaluated in the EA.

Following the workshop, the Trust

determined based upon public comment

that an EIS rather than an EA, as

previously noticed, would better serve

the agency’s compliance with the

NEPA’s requirements. Therefore, on

June 9, 2000, pursuant to 40 CFR

1508.22, the Trust published a notice of

intent to prepare an EIS (65 FR 36746)

and to extend the public scoping period

to provide additional time for the public

to make views known on the project. In

response to public input at the May 10,

2000 scoping workshop, the Trust held

a second public scoping workshop on

June 19, 2000, at which time the public

was able to tour Building 99 and

neighboring Building 100 and to

comment on revised project alternatives.

Shortly after the end of the public

comment period on July 24, 2000, the

Trust had received 11 comment letters

on NEPA issues and concerns regarding

the project from seven agencies, two

commenting organizations (one

organization submitted two letters), and

one individual. An additional 15

organizations and individuals also

submitted letters expressing either their

support or opposition to the project.

Termination of the Presidio Theatre

project EIS at this time is with the

mutual agreement of both the Trust and

San Francisco Film Centre (project

proponent). Independent of the Presidio

Theatre EIS process, the Trust initiated

the review and update of the GMPA.

The PTIP and associated EIS will

provide a comprehensive planning

framework for Area B of the Presidio.

Therefore, the Trust and the Presidio

Theatre project proponent have

determined to terminate the Presidio

Theatre EIS process until completion of

the PTIP and PTIP EIS process. A

complete administrative record,

including all public and agency

comments received and all work

completed or underway on the Presidio

Theatre project, will be maintained by

the Trust pending reinitiation, if

appropriate, of a Presidio Theatre

project following adoption of a

governing comprehensive plan for Area

B of the Presidio.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John

Pelka, NEPA Compliance Coordinator,

The Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street,

P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA

94129–0052. Telephone: 415–561–5300.

Dated: October 12, 2000.

Karen A. Cook,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 00–26706 Filed 10–17–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–4R–P

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application

To Withdraw From Listing and

Registration; (DuraSwitch Industries,

Inc., Common Stock, $.001 Par Value)

File No. 1–15069

October 12, 2000.

DuraSwithch Industries, Inc., a

Nevada corporation (‘‘Comany’’), has

filed an application with the Securities

and Exchange Commission

(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section

12(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act

of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 12d2–2(d)

thereunder,2 to withdraw its Common

Stock, $.001 par value (‘‘Security’’),

from listing and registration on the

American Stock Exchange LLC

(‘‘Amex’’).

The Company has effected a new

listing for its Security on the National

Market of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.

(‘‘Nasdaq’’). Trading in the Security on

the Nasdaq commenced, and was

concurrently suspended on the Amex, at

the opening of business on October 11,

2000. The Company hopes to realize a

broader institutional and retail investor

base by transferring trading in its

Security to the Nasdaq.

The Company has stated in its

application that it has complied with

the rules of the Amex governing the

withdrawal of its Security and that its

application relates solely to the

withdrawal of the Security from listing

and registration on the Amex and shall

have no effect upon the Security’s

continued designation for quotation on

the Nasdaq and registration under

Section 12(g) of the Act.3

Any interested person may, on or

before November 2, 2000, submit by

letter to the Secretary of the Securities

and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth

Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549–

0609, facts bearing upon whether the

application has been made in

accordance with the rules of the Amex

and what terms, if any, should be

imposed by the Commission for the

protection of investors. The

Commission, based on the information

submitted to it, will issue an order

granting the application after the date

mentioned above, unless the

Commission determines to order a

hearing on the matter.

For the Commission, by the Division of

Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated

authority.4

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–26743 Filed 10–17–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010–01–M

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Release No. IC–24685; File No. 812–12138]

The Penn Mutual Life Insurance

Company, et al., Notice of Application

October 11, 2000.

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange

Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’).

ACTION: Notice of application for an

order under section 6(c) of the

Investment Company Act of 1940 (the

‘‘1940 Act’’ or ‘‘Act’’) granting

exemptions from the provisions of

sections 2(a)(32), 22(c), and 27(i)(2)(A)

of the Act, and rule 22c–1 thereunder.

SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants

seek an order to permit the recapture of

certain credit enhancements (i) made by