alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

                    Under the authority granted to me as Chief Counsel of the Internal Revenue Service by the General Counsel of the Department of the Treasury by General Counsel Order No. 21 (Rev. 4), pursuant to the Civil Service Reform Act, I have appointed the following persons to the                           ( print page 64476)                        Legal Division Performance Review Board, Internal Revenue Service Panel:                 

1. Chairperson, Judith C. Dunn, Deputy Chief Counsel (Operations); 

2. Thomas M. McGivern, Counselor to the General Counsel; 

3. Cynthia J. Mattson, Deputy Division Counsel (Large and Mid-Size Business); 

4. Martha Sullivan , Deputy Division Counsel #2 (Small Business/Self Employed); 

5. Richard J. Mihelcic, Associate Chief Counsel (Finance and Management); 

6. Heather C. Maloy, Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting); 

7. Joseph F. Maselli, Area Counsel (Large and Mid-Size Business)(Area 2)(Heavy Manufacturing, Construction and Transportation). 

In addition, I hereby appoint the following persons to serve on the Performance Review Board for the Deputies Chief Counsel: 

8. Robert E. Wenzel, Deputy Commissioner of Internal Revenue; and 

9. Eric Solomon, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy). 

This publication is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). 

Dated: October 23, 2000.

Stuart L. Brown,

Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service. 

[FR Doc. 00-27694 Filed 10-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
## CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

Page - 1 I. GENERAL
District: Monterey Bay Unified APCD Date Adopted: 3/21/01
Rule No: Rule 205 Regul ation Title: Provision of Sampling an d Testing Facilities
Date Submitted To ARB: 1/22/01 Date Last Amended or Revised: 12/13/84 Pollutants Regulated By This Rule (Check):
NOx SO2 PM10 VOC TAC (Name of TAC)
Is this rule intended to be sent to the EPA as a SIP revision ? X Yes No.
SUMMARY OF RULE CHANGES: New rule U Amended rule Update rule to current District format.

II. NET EFFECT ON EMISSIONS Increase Decrease X No change N/A Emissions reduction commitment in SIP for this source category: tons/year
SCC/CES Code(s) Affected: na Affected SIC Code(s): na Inventory Year to Calculate Changes in Emissions: na Affected Area:
Future Year Control Profile Estimate ( VOC emissions): N/A
Tons/Year Baseline Reductions Tons/year Control Percent Control Control Year (increases) Subject to Rule Level Control Level Factor

N/A / = * 100 = % 1.00 - =

/ = * 100 = % 1.00 - = / = * 100 = % 1.00 - =

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS District is: Attainment Nonattainment X Split
A pproximate number of minor (<100 TPY) sources controlled by rule: na . Percent in nonattainment area: na

. Number of major ( **$** 100 TPY) sources controlled: N/A . Percent in nonattainment area: 0%

## CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

Page - 2 Location of Major Sources by City: N/A

IV. EMISSIONS REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY N/A
Does rule include emission limits that are continuous? Yes; No. If yes, those limits are in Section(s) of the rule.
O ther methods in the r ule for achieving emissions reductions are:

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS The rule contains: 1) Emission limits in Section(s) N/A

. 2) Work practice standards in Section(s) N/A

. 3) Record Keeping requirements in Section(s) N/A

. 4) Reporting requirements in Section(s) N/A

.

VI. I MPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN X No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts Attainment
DISCUSSION:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134381 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134381 

 COA: 277759 

Shiawassee CC: 06-004524-FC 

DANIEL J-ALEXANDER SPENCER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 1, 2007 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3290 

To provide that all Federal employees shall be deemed to be employees 

excepted from furlough for purposes of the Government shutdown commencing on or about October 1, 2013, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2013 

Mr. KINGSTON (for himself, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. WOLF, and Mr. 

MORAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide that all Federal employees shall be deemed to 

be employees excepted from furlough for purposes of 

the Government shutdown commencing on or about October 1, 2013, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES DURING 

4 GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—This Act applies with respect to 

6 any lapse in appropriations commencing on or about Octo7 ber 1, 2013. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3290 IH

1 (b) ALL EMPLOYEES TREATED AS EXCEPTED EM2 PLOYEES.—During a lapse in appropriations described in 

3 subsection (a), all Federal employees shall, for purposes 

4 of section 1342 of title 31, United States Code (and not5 withstanding the last sentence of such section), be deemed 

6 to be performing services relating to emergencies involving 

7 the safety of human life or the protection of property. 

8 (c) NORMAL RULES RELATING TO LEAVE AND HOLI9 DAYS.—Effective as of October 1, 2013, Federal employ10 ees considered excepted from furlough during a lapse in 

11 appropriations which is described in subsection (a), and 

12 which affects the agency activity in which the employee 

13 is engaged, shall not be considered to be furloughed when 

14 on leave and shall be subject to the same laws, rules, and 

15 regulations relating to leave and holidays as would apply 

16 if no lapse in appropriations had occurred. 

17 (d) COMPENSATION FOR FURLOUGHED EMPLOY18 EES.—Federal employees furloughed as a result of a lapse 

19 in appropriations described in subsection (a) shall be com20 pensated at their standard rate of compensation, for the 

21 period for which they were so furloughed, as soon as prac22 ticable after such lapse in appropriations ends. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3290 IH

1 (e) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this Act, the term 

2 ‘‘Federal employee’’ means an officer or employee of the 

3 United States Government. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,829
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,295)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,090
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,117
<PP&E>                                          84,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                (40,179)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 338,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,975
<BONDS>                                         97,933
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           145
<OTHER-SE>                                     167,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   338,035
<SALES>                                         17,340
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               250,139
<CGS>                                           11,918
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  209,619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (504)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,226
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,678
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,977
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,591
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,386
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,386
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.17


</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 343 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure that every military chaplain 

has the prerogative to close a prayer outside of a religious service 

according to the dictates of the chaplain’s own conscience. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2013 

Mr. JONES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure that every 

military chaplain has the prerogative to close a prayer 

outside of a religious service according to the dictates 

of the chaplain’s own conscience. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 343 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROTECTION OF THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM OF 

2 MILITARY CHAPLAINS TO CLOSE A PRAYER 

3 OUTSIDE OF A RELIGIOUS SERVICE ACCORD4 ING TO THE DICTATES OF THE CHAPLAIN’S 

5 CONSCIENCE. 

6 (a) UNITED STATES ARMY.—Section 3547 of title 

7 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(c) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a reli10 gious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to close 

11 the prayer according to the dictates of the chaplain’s own 

12 conscience.’’. 

13 (b) UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY.—Section 

14 4337 of such title is amended— 

15 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘There’’; and 

16 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub17 section: 

18 ‘‘(b) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a reli19 gious service, the Chaplain shall have the prerogative to 

20 close the prayer according to the dictates of the Chaplain’s 

21 conscience.’’. 

22 (c) UNITED STATES NAVY AND MARINE CORPS.— 

23 Section 6031 of such title is amended by adding at the 

24 end the following new subsection: 

25 ‘‘(d) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a reli26 gious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to close 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•HR 343 IH

1 the prayer according to the dictates of the chaplain’s own 

2 conscience.’’. 

3 (d) UNITED STATES AIR FORCE.—Section 8547 of 

4 such title is amended by adding at the end the following 

5 new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(c) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a reli7 gious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to close 

8 the prayer according to the dictates of the chaplain’s own 

9 conscience.’’. 

10 (e) UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY.—Section 

11 9337 of such title is amended— 

12 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘There’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub14 section: 

15 ‘‘(b) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a reli16 gious service, the Chaplain shall have the prerogative to 

17 close the prayer according to the dictates of the Chaplain’s 

18 conscience.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with
EXHIBIT 32.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Wherify  Wireless,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

October 13, 2005

                                         /s/ John Davis
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         John Davis
                                         Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                    (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
                  Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of SOURCECORP, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 13, 2003      /s/ Barry L. Edwards
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Barry L. Edwards
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 19, 2017

NO. 03

- 16

- 00259

- CV

James Boone, Appellant

v.

David Gutierrez, Chairman, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAV IS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

— OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on April 4, 2016

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the judgment

. Because appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
**WASHINGTON FEDERAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**EXHIBIT 32**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

**WASHINGTON FEDERAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Washington Federal, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the undersigned’s best knowledge and belief: 

(a) the Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(b) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated this 10th day of August 2009. 

 
/s/ Roy M. WhiteheadROY M. WHITEHEADChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerWashington Federal, Inc./s/ Brent J. BeardallBRENT J. BEARDALLExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerWashington Federal, Inc.
THIRD AMENDMENT AND ASSIGNMENT TO







FIFTH AMENDMENT TO 



RESTATED AND AMENDED PURCHASE AGREEMENT







 



This Fifth Amendment and Assignment to Restated and Amended Purchase Agreement ("Fourth Amendment") is effective as of the 1st of March, 2006, between MILLWORKS TOWN CENTER, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company ("Purchaser"), and THE KIRK & BLUM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, an Ohio corporation ("Seller").







WITNESSETH:







WHEREAS, Seller and Trademark Property Company entered into that certain Restated and Amended Purchase Agreement dated June 20, 2005, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Restated and Amended Purchase Agreement dated July 15, 2005 and the Second Amendment to Restated and Amended Purchase Agreement dated September 14, 2005; Seller, Trademark Property Company and Purchaser entered into the Third Amendment and Assignment to Restated and Amended Purchase Agreement dated October 20, 2005; and Seller and Purchaser entered into the Fourth Amendment to Restated and Amended Purchase Agreement dated December 29, 2005  (as amended, the "Agreement"), covering the sale of two (2) separate parcels of land, as more particularly described therein (unless otherwise defined herein, all defined terms in this Fourth Amendment will have the same meaning as in the Agreement); and 







WHEREAS, Purchaser and Seller have previously agreed that the Closing of Parcel A was extended to occur on or before March 1, 2006;







NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration -- which the parties acknowledge receiving -- Seller, Assignee and Assignor hereby agree as follows:










	Closing of Parcel A is extended until on or before April 24, 2006, notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary. 






	Purchaser may extend Closing of Parcel A until on or before May 23, 2006 by delivering to Seller a nonrefundable, but fully applicable to the purchase price, payment of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000.00) on or before April 21, 2006.  





Except as specifically modified by the terms of this Fourth Amendment, all of the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and unmodified and are hereby ratified by the parties.







This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, and all of which -- when taken together -- will constitute one (1) document.  Facsimile signatures will be treated as original signatures for all purposes hereunder.  







 



(signature blocks on following page)




EFFECTIVE as of the day and year first above written.







 



 



 
PURCHASER:MILLWORKS TOWN CENTER, LLC,
an Ohio limited liability company







 



By:



Name:



Its:







 



 



 



























SELLER:THE KIRK & BLUM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, 
an Ohio corporation







 



By:



Name:



Its:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.B CERTIFICATION I, Greg G. Gruber, certify that: 1. I have
reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tennessee Gas
Pipeline Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this Report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this Report
is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this Report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
Report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 11, 2005 /s/ Greg G. GruberGreg G. GruberSenior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company