alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         141,051
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  398,866
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 11,237,914
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,621,857
<PP&E>                                       4,190,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,443,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,590,818
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,958
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,032,348
<SALES>                                      8,673,032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,673,032
<CGS>                                        4,811,110
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,722,458
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             711,433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,745,945)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,745,945)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,745,945)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65327-65328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-36,633 and TA-W-36,633AA]


Levi Strauss & Company, Wichita Falls Plant, Wichita Falls, 
Texas; Levi Strauss & Company, Walnut Creek Road Office, Walnut Creek, 
California; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on August 11, 1999, applicable 
to workers of Levi Strauss & Company, Wichita Falls Plant, Wichita 
Falls, Texas. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
September 29, 1999 (64 FR 52541). The certification document was 
amended several times to include numerous facilities located at various 
locations.
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of denim and Docker apparel. The company reports that 
worker separations occurred at the Walnut Creek Road Office of Levi 
Strauss located in Walnut Creek, California. The Walnut Creek Road 
Office is a satellite office of the subject firms' headquarters located 
in San Francisco, California and directly supports Levi Strauss's many 
production facilities.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Levi Strauss & Company adversely affected by increased 
imports. Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
include workers of Levi Strauss & Company, Walnut Creek Road Office, 
Walnut Creek, California.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-36,633 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Levi Strauss & Company, Wichita Falls Plant, 
Wichita Falls, Texas (TA-W-36,633) and Walnut Creek Road Office, 
Walnut Creek, California (TA-W-36,633AA) who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after

[[Page 65328]]

August 8, 1999 through August 11, 2001 are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 19th day of October, 2000.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-28026 Filed 10-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of MDSI Mobile Data Solutions Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Erik Dysthe, the President, Chief Executive
Officer, Chairman of the Board and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Erik Dysthe
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Chairman of the Board and Director
August 14, 2003
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3458] 

# AGENCY:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the following determinations.

                        Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 [79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459], the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 [112 Stat. 2681                         *et seq.*], Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999 [64 FR 56014], and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999 [64 FR 57920], as amended by Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 [65 FR 53795], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibit, “Art and the Camera: The photographs of F. Holland Day,” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with a foreign lender. I also determine that the temporary exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Massachusetts from on or about December 6, 2000, to on or about March 25, 2002, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, 202/619-5997, and the address is SA-44, Room 700, United States Department of State, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547-0001.

Dated: October 23, 2000.

William B. Bader,

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 00-27804  Filed 10-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-08-M
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS
        PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Hyperdynamics Corporation
        (Hyperdynamics), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Steven M. Plumb,
        Chief Financial Officer of Hyperdynamics, does hereby certify, pursuant to
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to his
        knowledge:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
        February 20, 2007
 
 By:
              /s/
                  Steven M. PlumbSteven
                  M. PlumbChief
                  Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-38,115]

On October 18, 2000, the company requested Administrative Reconsideration for workers and former workers of the subject firm engaged in the production of stud lumber.

                    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination issued on October 3, 2000, because imports did not contribute importantly to the worker separations. The notice soon will be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

New information submitted to the Department by the company and additional information supplied by a primary customer of the subject firm revealed that the customer has increased purchases of imported stud lumber while reducing purchases from the subject firm.

## Conclusion

After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on reopening, it is concluded that increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with apparel produced by the subject firm contributed importantly to the decline in sales and to the total or partial separation of workers of the subject firm. In accordance with the provisions of the Trade Act of 1974, I make the following revised determination:

All workers of Wallowa Forest Products, Wallowa, Oregon, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after June 27, 1999 through two years from the date of this certification are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, DC this 19th day of October 2000.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-28025 Filed 10-31-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### G. C. CROUCH v. STATE.

No. 24422.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 15, 1949.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 18, 1950.

Nat Gentry, of Tyler, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction is for a violation of the Pure Food Law, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 706 et seq.; the punishment assessed, a fine of $150.

The case of Neill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 225 S.W.2d 829, is, in all legal aspects, the same as that here presented. '

The opinion in that case is here applicable, and reference is made thereto.

For the reasons there stated, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40433

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARIO ALBERTO GARCIA-BALDERAS

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:07-CR-1227-1

Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Mario Alberto Garcia-Balderas appeals his 77-month

sentence of imprisonment following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry

following deportation. Garcia-Balderas contends that the district court erred in

calculating the advisory guidelines sentencing range when the district court

imposed a 16-level adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A), based on a prior

state conviction. The district court based the adjustment on Garcia-Balderas’s

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 1, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40433

2

Texas state conviction for delivery of marijuana in amount of more than 50

pounds but less than 200 pounds, or a Texas state conviction for aggravated

assault. 

Garcia-Balderas has failed to establish plain error because the evidence

with which the government supplemented the record on appeal demonstrates

that Garcia-Balderas was convicted of delivery by actual transfer of marijuana,

an offense that qualifies as a drug trafficking offense under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). See

United States v. Garcia-Arellano, 522 F.3d 477, 481 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 129

S. Ct. 353 (2008); United States v. Gonzales, 484 F.3d 712, 714-15 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 127 S. Ct. 3031 (2007). As Garcia-Balderas failed to demonstrate plain

error in the application of the enhancement on the basis of the drug offense, we

do not consider the other possible basis for the enhancement, viz., the

aggravated assault. See United States v. Jackson, 453 F.3d 302, 308 n.11 (5th

Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 4 

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 

6~ FORSYTH STREET 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

May 20,2014 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

TO: 

Public Comment Submission for Docket ID No. EPA-R04·0AR-2013·0272; 

Entitled "Comments on EPA's Proposed Approval of Jefferson County SIP 

Revisions Addressing Emissions During Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction 

Events" 

Adam Diltsfij 

Office of Air, Pesticides and Toxics Legal Support 

File and Docket EPA-R04-0AR-2013-0272 

.. ( 

' . 

The EPA notes that the above-referenced public comment received by the Agency in connection 

with Docket ID No. EPA-R04-0AR-2013-0272 was labeled "confidential draft" and included 

redlined additions and strikeouts to the text. The comment was also submitted as an unlocked 

Microsoft Word document. Due to the apparent draft nature of the submittal, the EPA was 

concerned that comment may have been submitted in error. The EPA contacted the Kentucky 

Environmental Foundation- the submittal's lead signatory organization- and confirmed with the 

organization's Executive Director that the submittal was intended for inclusion in the public 

record. Based upon that confirmation, the subject submittal is included, as received, in the 

docket for this rulemaking. See Docket ID No. EPA-R04-0AR-2013·0272. 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
exv10w14



 






Exhibit 10.14




     Tommy L. Andrews, John B. (Jack) Benton, Laura Jo De Cespedes, Kathleen Flanagan, George W.
Gresham, Rahul Gupta, Kay J. Nichols, Larence Park, Kevin L. Reager and Clyde L. Thomas have
entered into Change in Control Agreements that are substantially identical in all respects to the
agreement with Paul F. Walsh that was filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.



     Steven F. Coleman has entered into a Change in Control Agreement that, as amended, is
substantially identical in all material respects to the Agreement and amendment thereto filed as
Exhibits 10.29 and 10.30, respectively, to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

of

Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Thomas W. Hofmann, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sunoco, Inc., hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sunoco, Inc.



|                     |  |                          
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------
|Date: August 7, 2008 |  | /s/ Thomas W. Hofmann    
|                     |  | Thomas W. Hofmann        
|                     |  | Senior Vice President and
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JAMES DALTON BELL,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-30216

D.C. No. 3:00-cr-05731-RBL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 24, 2011** 

Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

James Dalton Bell contends that the 24-month sentence imposed upon

revocation of supervised release violated his rights to due process and a jury trial. 

We dismiss.

We will not review the merits of Bell’s contentions because the

FILED

JUN 07 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-30216

“interlocutory notice of appeal” (“NOA”) does not mention the sentence, which

was imposed six days after the NOA was filed, and no subsequent NOA was ever

filed. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(B); 4(b)(1)(A) and (b)(2).

DISMISSED.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 10

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

- 3140

OFFICE OF

AIR, WASTE, AND TOXICS

February 5, 2014

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Incremental Co st TASCO: LNB vs SCR

FROM: Steve Body /S/

TO: The Files

It appears that the N ational P ark S ervice, in their comments on our proposed approval of

the TASCO BART Alternative (published June 28, 2 013), improperly calculated the incremental

cost effectiveness of SCR over LNB by using the original performance of LNB in the 2010 SIP

submittal, rather than the more stringent NOx emission limit in the 2012 SIP Submittal

. The

NPS calculation assumes a 5 0% control efficiency for LNB with an emission reduction of 521

t/y from the base case of 1042 t/y annual emissions. Using the new proposed emission limit of

147 lb/hr. the emission reduction from LNB is 632 t/y, that represents a control efficiency of

60 %. The incremental cost should have been calculated based on SCR cost and emission

reduction

, compared to the original LNB costs and new LNB performance of 14 7 lb/hr

.

SCR annualized cost: $3,534,384

SCR emissions: 104 t/y

LNB annualized cost: $47 9,841

New LNB emissions: 410 t/y

Thus incremental cost effectiveness of SCR over LNB with new BART emission limit is:

- 3,054,570/

- 306 = $9982/t
#### TIFFIN v. STATE.

No. 26232.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 4, 1953.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Drunk driving upon a public highway is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-21-00529-CR

Manuel M. AYALA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR9405

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE WATKINS, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED December 6, 2023.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice