alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00024-CV

Melinda Greenhaw, Appellant

v.

HSBC Bank USA, as Trustee for PHH Alternative Mortgage Trust, Series 2007-3, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF BELL COUNTY

NO. 76,094, HONORABLE REBECCA DEPEW, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding possession in a forcible detainer case.

1

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due in this Court on February 12, 2014. On April 8, 2014,

Melinda Greenhaw was notified that no clerk’s record had been filed due to her failure to pay

or make arrangements to pay the district clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The notice

requested that Greenhaw make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report

regarding this appeal by April 18, 2014. Greenhaw has not filed a status report or otherwise

responded to this Court’s notice.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to appellant’s failure to pay

or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court may dismiss

Although the underlying suit named Darrel Greenhaw and/or all occupants of the property 1

as defendants, the notice of appeal is in the name only of Melinda Greenhaw. But even if the other

defendants were parties to this appeal, our disposition would be the same.
the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of

costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Because Greenhaw has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay

the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: May 16, 2014

2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3230 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3230

   Making continuing appropriations during a Government shutdown to 
provide pay and allowances to members of the reserve components of the 
  Armed Forces who perform inactive-duty training during such period.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2013

  Mr. Rogers of Kentucky (for himself, Mr. Latham, and Mrs. Walorski) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   Making continuing appropriations during a Government shutdown to 
provide pay and allowances to members of the reserve components of the 
  Armed Forces who perform inactive-duty training during such period.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pay Our Guard and Reserve Act''.

SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR PAY AND ALLOWANCES FOR CERTAIN 
              RESERVE COMPONENT MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) In General.--There are hereby appropriated for fiscal year 
2014, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for 
any period during which interim or full-year appropriations for fiscal 
year 2014 are not in effect such sums as are necessary to provide pay 
and allowances to members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces 
(as named in section 10101 of title 10, United States Code) who perform 
inactive-duty training (as defined in section 101(d)(7) of such title) 
during such period.
    (b) Termination.--Appropriations and funds made available and 
authority granted pursuant to this section shall be available until 
whichever of the following first occurs: (1) the enactment into law of 
an appropriation (including a continuing appropriation) for any purpose 
for which amounts are made available in this section; (2) the enactment 
into law of the applicable regular or continuing appropriations 
resolution or other Act without any appropriation for such purpose; or 
(3) January 1, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2023 ND 194

In the Interest of C.K., Jr., a child

Kelley M. R. Cole, Walsh County State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

C.K., Jr., child, D.A., mother, Respondents 

and

C.D.K., Sr., father, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20230293

Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Walsh County, Northeast Judicial District, 

the Honorable Barbara L. Whelan, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Kelley M. R. Cole, State’s Attorney, Grafton, ND, for petitoner and appellee.

Ulysses S. Jones, Devils Lake, ND, for respondent and appellant. 

FILED 

IN THE OFFICE OF THE 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

OCTOBER 11, 2023 

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1

Interest of C.K.

No. 20230293

Per Curiam.

[¶1] C.D.K., the father, appeals from the juvenile court’s corrected findings of 

fact, conclusions of law, and order terminating his parental rights to the minor 

child, C.K. The order also terminates the parental rights of the child’s mother, 

D.A. C.D.K. argues the court erred in finding the child is in need of protection,

the conditions causing the need for protection are likely to continue, and the 

child is suffering or will probably suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or 

emotional harm. C.D.K. does not challenge the court’s finding the child spent 

over 450 of the last 660 nights in the care, control, and custody of the human 

service zone.

[¶2] The juvenile court found the child spent over 450 of the last 660 nights 

in the care, control, and custody of the human service zone and is in need of 

protection. The record supports the court’s findings, and they are not clearly 

erroneous. We conclude C.D.K. has not shown the court abused its discretion 

terminating C.D.K.’s parental rights. We need not address C.D.K.’s challenge 

to the court’s other findings. N.D.C.C. § 27-20.3-20(1)(c)(2); Interest of R.L.-P., 

2014 ND 28, ¶ 23, 842 N.W.2d 889 (“Because a finding that the children have 

been in foster care more than 450 out of the previous 660 nights, along with a 

finding of deprivation [now, the children are ‘in need of protection’], is sufficient 

to terminate parental rights under N.D.C.C. § 27-20-44(1)(c) [now N.D.C.C. § 

27-20.3-20(1)(c)], it is unnecessary to address the parents’ challenge to the 

finding that the conditions and causes of the deprivation will likely continue.”).

We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte

Douglas A. Bahr
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FRONTIER TELEPHONE OF ROCHESTER FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>          0000936105
<NAME>         FRONTIER TELEPHONE OF ROCHESTER
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          53,570
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,501
<INVENTORY>                                        467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,531
<PP&E>                                       1,046,987
<DEPRECIATION>                                 658,863
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 531,438
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,060
<BONDS>                                         40,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       232,165
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   531,438
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               172,358
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  127,544
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,055)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,731
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,037
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,694
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,694
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3029 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3029

  To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise certain 
  rules relating to the status of qualified prepaid tuition programs 
                       under the securities laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2013

 Mr. Hurt (for himself and Mr. Delaney) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise certain 
  rules relating to the status of qualified prepaid tuition programs 
                       under the securities laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``College Savings Enhancement Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. STATUS OF QUALIFIED PREPAID TUITION PROGRAMS.

    (a) Revision of Rules.--Not later than 270 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission shall 
revise its regulations contained in--
            (1) section 230.144A(a)(1) of title 17, Code of Federal 
        Regulations, to include qualified prepaid tuition programs 
        under the definition of a qualified institutional buyer; and
            (2) section 230.501 of such title, to include qualified 
        prepaid tuition programs that have total assets in excess of 
        $5,000,000 as accredited investors.
    (b) Qualified Prepaid Tuition Program Defined.--For purposes of the 
revisions required by subsection (a), the term ``qualified prepaid 
tuition program'' means a qualified tuition program (as defined in 
section 529(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 
529(b)(1)(A)(i))) established and maintained by a State or agency or 
instrumentality of a State, and that satisfies the other requirements 
of such section 529.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 11104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04322]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9907-16-Region 9]

Yosemite Slough Superfund Site, San Francisco, CA; Notice of 
Proposed CERCLA Ability To Pay Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as 
amended (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a 
proposed administrative settlement with one ability to pay party for 
recovery of response costs concerning the Yosemite Slough Superfund 
Site in San Francisco, California. The settlement is entered into 
pursuant to Section 122(h)(1) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622(h)(1), and it 
requires the settling party to pay $50,000 to the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency (Agency). The settlement includes a 
covenant not to sue the settling party pursuant to Sections 106 or 
107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 or 9607(a). For thirty (30) days 
following the date of publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register, the Agency will receive written comments relating to the 
settlement. The Agency will consider all comments received and may 
modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate the proposed settlement 
is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any 
comments received will be available for public inspection at 75 
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.

DATES: Pursuant to Section 122(i) of CERCLA, EPA will receive written 
comments relating to this proposed settlement until March 31, 2014.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement is available for public inspection 
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. A 
copy of the proposed settlement may be obtained from Rachel Tennis, 
Attorney-Adviser (ORC-3), Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. EPA Region 
IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105; phone: (415) 972-
3746. Comments should reference the Yosemite Slough Superfund Site, San 
Francisco, California and should be addressed to Rachel Tennis at the 
above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Tennis, Attorney-Adviser (ORC-
3), Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne 
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105; phone: (415) 972-3746; fax: (417) 947-
3570; email: tennis.rachel@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Party to the Proposed Settlement: Angelica 
Gnzalez.

    Dated: February 6, 2014.
Enrique Manzanilla,
Director, Superfund Division, U. S. EPA, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2014-04322 Filed 2-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<LEGEND>
    TRANSMITTING STV GROUP'S FISCAL 1999 THIRD QUARTER FORM 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000095045
<NAME> STV GROUP, INC

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                      4,073,000
<SECURITIES>                                                   15,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                              29,309,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  660,000
<INVENTORY>                                                15,717,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           49,225,000
<PP&E>                                                      6,338,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                              4,636,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             53,606,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      33,700,000
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                    2,036,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                 14,245,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               16,281,000
<SALES>                                                   102,236,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          102,236,000
<CGS>                                                      60,259,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              66,350,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            149,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             5,203,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                2,469,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         2,734,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                2,734,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.65



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           8,461
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   325
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     28,422
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            25,004
<LOANS>                                        130,993
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 198,960
<DEPOSITS>                                     165,571
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,663
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           365
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 198,960
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,005
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,081
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   235
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,321
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,776
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,545
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       25
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 455
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,631
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,962
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,962
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,573
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,206
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,783
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,244
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       63
<RECOVERIES>                                        38
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,244
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00123

- CR

OSCAR OLIVERIA III APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 396TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1308 079W

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPIN ION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “ A mended Motion To Withdraw Appeal. ”

The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex.

R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we

received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 7, 2014
In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name*: Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacturing, and Industrial Innovation (61).                    

*Date/Time*: March 7, 8, 14-17, 20-24, 28, 29, & 31, 2000; 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.                    

*Place*: Rooms 130, 310, 330, 360, 370, 380, and 580, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting*: Closed.                    

*Contact Person*: Joseph Hennessey, Program Manager, Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer Programs, Room 590, Division of Design, Manufacturing, and Industrial Innovation, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 306-1395, extension 5283.                    

*Purpose of Meeting*: To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda*: To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Programs as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing*: The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary of confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 USC 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: February 1, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-2739  Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
 
 
 I, Alicia Borst Derrah, the Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and principal financial officer of Man Investments (USA) Corp., the general partner of Man-AHL Diversified I L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Annual Report of the Partnership on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 
 
 Date:  March 31, 2010
 s/ Alicia Borst Derrah
 Alicia Borst Derrah
 Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary