alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas EmissionsMeeting Documentation Sierra Club, Clean Air Task Force, NRDC,Earthjustice 1/11/2011Date Regional Staff ContactInformation (Name, email,phone #)Name of Organization (Attach list ofall attendees names and emails ifpossible)Summary of Discussion(e.g., applicability,reporting requirements, etc.)Written CommentsProvided?Did they alsosubmit to Docket?Date sent toEPA- CCD1/11/2011[All email addresses areLastName.FirstName@epa.gov]Jessica GordonJennifer BohmanBill IrvingRagan TateMark DeFigueirdoLisa BacanskasRoger FernandezAkachi ImegwuAmy BranningCindy AndersonDeborah OttingerMelanie ShephardsonDavid JacobsonLisa HanleLisa Grogan-McCulloghPamela FranklinBarbora MasterKatherine SiboldSierra Club:Craig Segall(Craig.Segall@sierraclub.org)Danielle GagneClean Air Task Force:Helen SilverNRDC:George PeridasMeleah GeertsmaEarthjustice:Tim BalloEmma CheuseCBI rules, deferral, and Call forInformationCCS rule, especially the R&D exemptionOil & Gas rule, especially the offshorereporting systemNo N/a
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21

                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 State or Other
                                                                 Jurisdiction of    Percentage
                                                                 Incorporation      Ownership
                                                                 -------------      ---------
<S>                                                              <C>                <C>
Parent
------

BCSB Bankcorp, Inc.                                              United States


Subsidiary (1)
----------

Baltimore County Savings Bank, F.S.B.                            United States            100%


Subsidiaries of Baltimore County Savings Bank, F.S.B. (1)
-----------------------------------------------------

Baltimore County Service Corp.                                   United States            100%
Ebenezer Road, Inc.                                              United States            100%
</TABLE>

__________________
(1)      The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included
         in the consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report
         to Stockholders attached hereto as Exhibit 13.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 65316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28161]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.
    Date & Time: Tuesday, November 7, 2000 at 10 a.m.
    Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.
    Items to be Discussed: Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 
437g. Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings 
or arbitration. Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters 
affecting a particular employee.

    Date & Time: Thursday, November 9, 2000 at 10 a.m.
    Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. (Ninth Floor).
    Status: This meeting will be open to the public.
    Items to be Discussed: Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    General Public Political Communications Coordinated with Candidates 
and Independent Expenditures: Draft Final Rules with Explanation and 
Justification.
    Administrative Matters.
    Person to Contact for Information: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-28161 Filed 10-30-00; 2:08 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

TYESHA ISOM, )

)

)

Plaintiff, )

 ) Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-01104 (UNA) 

v. )

 )

ANTONIO GUTERRES, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the court on its initial review of plaintiff’s pro se complaint

(“Compl.”), ECF No. 1, and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. The 

court grants the in forma pauperis application and, for the reasons explained below, it dismisses

the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

“A complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to 

relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009), quoting Bell Atl. 

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). A complaint that lacks “an arguable basis either in 

law or in fact” is frivolous, Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989), and a “complaint plainly 

abusive of the judicial process is properly typed malicious,” Crisafi v. Holland, 655 F.2d 1305, 

1309 (D.C. Cir. 1981). 

Here, plaintiff, a resident of Denton, Texas, sues the Secretary-General of the United 

Nations and the Denton County District Attorney, citing, without any explanation, the Ohio and 

Texas local codes, and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. See Compl. at 1–3. The complaint 

is vague and rambling, alleging a wide-spread conspiracy, and oscillating through disparate topics, 

including, “UN General irresponsibility,” “Haiti women with drug addiction and AIDS,” genocide,
“borrowed money from foreign corporations,” “the NFL Soccer Federation,” online sports 

gambling, homelessness, “security on [plaintiff’s] properties,” “US Tax payer’s revenue,” and 

“foreign soldiers” in the United States armed forces. See id. at 6. Plaintiff demands “500 billion 

dollars to the US federation,” and asks this court to “restore sanity in the US economy[.]” See id. 

The court cannot exercise subject matter jurisdiction over a frivolous complaint. Hagans 

v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 536–37 (1974) (“Over the years, this Court has repeatedly held that the 

federal courts are without power to entertain claims otherwise within their jurisdiction if they are 

‘so attenuated and unsubstantial as to be absolutely devoid of merit.’”) (quoting Newburyport 

Water Co. v. Newburyport, 193 U.S. 561, 579 (1904); Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1010 

(D.C. Cir. 2009) (examining cases dismissed “for patent insubstantiality,” including where the 

plaintiff allegedly “was subjected to a campaign of surveillance and harassment deriving from 

uncertain origins.”). A court may dismiss a complaint as frivolous “when the facts alleged rise to 

the level of the irrational or the wholly incredible,” Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992), 

or “postulat[e] events and circumstances of a wholly fanciful kind,” Crisafi, 655 F.2d at 1307–08. 

The instant complaint satisfies this standard.

Consequently, the complaint and this case are dismissed without prejudice. A separate 

order accompanies this memorandum opinion. 

__________/s/_____________

Date: May 20, 2024 AMIT P. MEHTA 

United States District Judge
Exhibit 32.1



                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V (the Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. for
the period ended December 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel, Regular Trustee
of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Trust.


                                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V


                                    By:     /s/ MARLENE DEBEL
                                           ------------------
                                    Name:   Marlene Debel*
                                    Title:  Regular Trustee



Dated: March 25, 2008
---------------------

*  Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
of the Trust for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of European Micro Holdings, Inc. (the
“ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date: October 12, 2006
            By:
            */s/
                John B. Gallagher*Name:
            John
                B. GallagherTitle:
            Co-Chief
                Executive Officer


Date: October 12, 2006
            By:
            */s/
                Harry D. Shields*Name:
            Harry
              D. ShieldsTitle:
            Co-Chief Executive
              Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to European Micro Holdings, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by European Micro Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Ex parte MAYBERRY.

No. 25500.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 10, 1951.

Carter, Stiernberg, Blanton *&*Skaggs, Harlingen, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

Appellant filed a writ of habeas corpus with the Honorable Arthur Klein, Judge of the 107th Judicial District, complaining of his restraint by virtue of said court’s failure to set a reasonable bail pending his trial on a charge of statutory rape.

The trial court ordered appellant confined without bail. An original writ was filed in this court during vacation and was not then considered. We now review the appeal from the trial court’s order.

We have examined this record in the light of the many decisions of our court and are of the opinion that this is a bailable case.

The judgment denying bail is reversed and bail is now set at the sum of $20,000.
PENBECK, INC. d/b/a NEWBERRY'S BACKYARD BAR

- B

- Q and ANGELA SALISBURY
, Appellant s ,

v.

ROCCO T. VOGLIO, an individual, BEV'S BURGER CAFE, a Florida corporation and BEVERLY MILLER, an individual
, Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DIST RICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3159

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 20, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Toby S. Monaco , Judge

. Ralf R. Rodriguez and Monique S. Cardenas of Peckar & Abramson, Miami , for Appellant s

.
Stuart Scott Walker and Norman S. Bledsoe of Folds & Walker, LLC, Gaine s ville
, for Appellee s

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF
, MAKAR
, and OSTERHA US
, J J

. , CONCUR.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3226 

To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 

certain properties in South Carolina. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2013 

Mr. RICE of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 

Resources System certain properties in South Carolina. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF PROPERTIES IN SOUTH CARO4 LINA FROM JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BAR5 RIER RESOURCES SYSTEM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

7 revise one or more maps included in the set of maps enti8 tled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ referred to in 

9 section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

10 U.S.C. 3503(a)), and relating to John H. Chafee Coastal 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3226 IH

1 Barrier Resources System Unit SC–01 in South Carolina, 

2 as necessary to remove from such System the following 

3 parcels of land adjacent to property located at 10108 

4 Kings Road in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina: 

5 (1) The parcel identified in the land records of 

6 Horry County, South Carolina, as TMS 155–00–01– 

7 115, consisting of approximately 6.94 acres. 

8 (2) The parcel identified in such land records 

9 as TMS 155–00–01–051, consisting of approxi10 mately 13.91 acres. 

11 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

12 shall keep each map revised under subsection (a) on file 

13 and available for inspection in accordance with section 

14 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 

15 3503(b)). 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Steve Chamberlin, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-KSB of Warning Model Management, Inc. (the "Company");
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual report does not contain any
 untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
 to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such
 statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
 Annual report; and
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual report.
 
 4. The Company's other certifying officers and me are responsible for
 establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
 Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
 such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
 ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
 consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
 particularly during the period in which this Annual report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
 controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
 effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
 period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's
 internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
 most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
 on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
 the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors
 (or persons performing the equivalent functions);
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
 internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
 process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
 Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
 management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
 internal controls over financial reporting.
 
 Date: April 13, 2004
 
 /s/ Steve Chamberlin
 --------------------------------------------
 SteveChamberlin
 Director and Managing Member of WAMM
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Hyperdynamics Corporation
(Hyperdynamics), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Jason Davis, Chief
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Hyperdynamics, does hereby
certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350),
that to his knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of us.




Date:
November 15, 2010


By: 
      /s/ Jason Davis
                  
                  Jason
      Davis
                      Principal
      Financial Officer and
                      Principal
      Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3201 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3201

To amend the National Coal Heritage Area Act of 1996 to reauthorize the 
                 Augusta Canal National Heritage Area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 2013

Mr. Barrow of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Coal Heritage Area Act of 1996 to reauthorize the 
                 Augusta Canal National Heritage Area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Augusta Canal National Heritage Area 
Reauthorization Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUGUSTA CANAL NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA.

    Section 310 of the National Coal Heritage Area Act of 1996 (16 
U.S.C. 461 note; Division II of Public Law 104-333) is amended by 
striking ``September 30, 2013'' and inserting ``September 30, 2023''.
                                 <all>
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Yogurt Culture, Inc. and Michelle Anderssen v. Shannon A. Lang,

PLLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00414

- CV

Trial court case number: 1103656

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

On August 22, 2019, this Court issued an order staying the appeal after receiving notice that appellant, Michelle Anderssen, had filed a petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. On S eptember 24, 2019, appellant, Yogurt Culture, Inc., filed a motion to reinstate the appeal because the bankruptcy court dismissed Anderssen’s case on September 10, 2019. A copy of the bankruptcy court’s order is attached.

Accordingly, we grant the motion a nd reinstate the appeal on the active docket. Appellant’s brief received on August 30, 2019 is ordered filed as of the date of this order . Appellee’s brief

is due 30 days from the date of this order

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___ Justice Peter K elly

______________________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ October 8, 2019

___
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6331

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

COURTNEY ANTHONY BAILEY, 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District 

Judge. (8:05-cr-00099-AW-1; 8:07-cv-00290-AW) 

Submitted: August 17, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Courtney Anthony Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. Chan Park, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

Courtney Anthony Bailey seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a 

successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion, and 

dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless 

a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); Reid v. Angelone, 

369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating 

that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bailey has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

Additionally, we construe Bailey’s notice of appeal 

and informal brief as an application to file a second or 

successive motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. United States v.

Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to 

2 
3 

obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a 

prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) newly 

discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due 

diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and 

convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no 

reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the 

offense; or (2) a new rule of constitutional law, previously 

unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on 

collateral review. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(h) (West Supp. 2009). 

Bailey’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. 

Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 

motion. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED