alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Industry Functional Advisory Committee for Customs Matters will hold a meeting on November 9, 2000, from 9:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. The meeting will be closed to the public from 9:30 a.m. to 12 noon, and opened to the public from 12 noon to 1 p.m.

# DATES:

The meeting is scheduled for November 9, 2000, unless otherwise notified.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Department of Commerce, Room B841B, located at 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, unless otherwise notified.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dan Gardner, (202) 482-3681 and Katherine Wiehagen (202) 482-0357, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, or Dominic Bianchi, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, 1724 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20508, (202) 395-6120.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

During the opened portion of the meeting the U.S. Customs Entry Revision Project (ERP) will be discussed by representatives from the U.S. Customs Service and the Bureau of the Census. The ERP was introduced by the Customs Service in 1999 as a proposal to change U.S. customs laws and make them more consistent with current business practices and promote effective compliance. This discussion is an opportunity for the Industry Functional Advisory Committee for Customs Matters to be briefed and invite comments on ERP progress to date.

Dominic Bianchi,

Acting Assistant United States Trade Representative for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Liaison.

[FR Doc. 00-27861  Filed 10-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 7, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00114

- CV

Hari Prasad KALAKONDA and Latha Kalakonda,

Appellant s

v.

ASPRI INVESTMENTS, LLC

,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 16394 Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due March 31, 2015. On March 30, 2015, the court reporter filed a request for an extension of time until May 29, 2015 t o file the record. We grant the motion in part and order Tracy Plummer to file the reporter’s record by April 30, 2015

. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c) (stating court of appeals must not grant an extension exceeding thirty days in an ordinary appeal).

________ _________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of April, 2015

.

________ ___________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2




                         [Genomic Solutions Letterhead]


                                 April 29, 2002



United States Securities & Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

         Re:       Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X

Dear Sir/Madame:

         The audited financial statements for our Employee Stock Purchase Plan
filed with our Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2001 include an
accountant's report from Arthur Andersen LLP issued after March 14, 2002. Arthur
Andersen has represented to us in a letter dated April 26, 2002, that this audit
was subject to Arthur Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting
and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate
continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit, availability of
national office consultation, and availability of personnel at foreign
affiliates of Arthur Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

                                   Sincerely,
                             GENOMIC SOLUTIONS INC.





                            /s/ Steven J. Richvalsky
                Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President
                                  and Treasurer
#### REYNOLDS v. STATE.

No. 23394.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 12, 1946.

*1009Cunningham, Lipscomb & Cole, of Bon-ham, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Upon his plea of guilty to the offense of unlawfully carrying a pistol, appellant’s punishment was fixed at a fine of $100.

By motion for new trial, appellant sought to set aside the judgment for several reasons, among which was that he was not, in fact, guilty of the offense charged, that he entered the plea of guilty under duress, and that he was illiterate and unlearned, not knowing his legal rights.

It appears that upon the hearing of the motion for new trial, the appellant offered to sustain, by proof, the allegations contained in the motion but was prevented by the trial court from so doing, upon the ■theory of the State that .the plea of guilty was final and not subject to be set aside by the attack sought to be made thereon.

The bill of exception presenting this matter shows that the appellant “expected to prove and would have shown by the witness, W. J. Green, if he had been permitted to do so * * * ; that he (appellant) was by the said .witness and other members of the Sheriff’s force to Fannin County, Texas, advised to and under duress did plead .guilty to the charge filed against him in the County Court of Fannin County, Texas; * * * that said accused was in fact not guilty of the offense for which he was tried and convicted; that he (witness), as arresting officer, was not possessed of lawful facts which showed that accused was guilty of the offense for which he was tried and convicted * *

The approval of this bill of exception constitutes a certificate by the trial court that the appellant entered the plea of guilty under duress and that he was not, in fact, guilty of the offense.

Such being the facts, the trial court should have granted the new trial. Meeking v. State, 67 Tex.Cr.R. 69, 148 S.W. 309.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 210 (Wednesday, October 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 64932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25814]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Nevada

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Nevada. The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that 
public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, November 20, 2013, 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Atomic Testing Museum, 755 E. Flamingo Road, Las 
Vegas, Nevada 89119.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Ulmer, Board Administrator, 
232 Energy Way, M/S 505, North Las Vegas, Nevada 89030. Phone: (702) 
630-0522; Fax (702) 295-5300 or Email: NSSAB@nnsa.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda:

1. Corrective Action Alternatives for Corrective Action Unit 550, 
Smokey Contamination Area--Work Plan Item 1
2. External Peer Review for Yucca Flat--Work Plan Item 2
3. Radionuclide Decay at Use-Restricted Soil Sites--Work Plan Item 
3
4. Overview of the Groundwater Open House--Work Plan Item 4

    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Nevada, welcomes the attendance 
of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will make every 
effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or special 
needs. If you require special accommodations due to a disability, 
please contact Barbara Ulmer at least seven days in advance of the 
meeting at the phone number listed above. Written statements may be 
filed with the Board either before or after the meeting. Individuals 
who wish to make oral presentations pertaining to agenda items should 
contact Barbara Ulmer at the telephone number listed above. The request 
must be received five days prior to the meeting and reasonable 
provision will be made to include the presentation in the agenda. The 
Deputy Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting 
in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Individuals wishing to make public comments can do so during the 15 
minutes allotted for public comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing to Barbara Ulmer at 
the address listed above or at the following Web site: http://nv.energy.gov/nssab/MeetingMinutes.aspx.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on October 23, 2013.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-25814 Filed 10-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
# Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID ASRAC Commercial HVAC, CRE, and WH Working Group: Meeting and Webinar324613016 Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) Jul 01, 2013 09:17 AM EDT 523 Total Attended 21 

# Session Details

First Name Last Name Email CountryAddress City StateOrganization Zip Code John Bean US 801 Corporate Center DriveO'Fallon MOSchneider Electric63368 Rodney Beever US 491 E. Princess St. York PA United CoolAir Corp.17403 jeremiah freeman US doe washington DC new west 20585 Marshall Hunt US 245 Market Street San Francisco CA Pacific Gas & Electric Co94105 Dominic Kolandayan US 1645 Wallace Dr Carrollton TX Daikin AC (Americas), Inc. 75006 Stephen Kowalski US 2701 Wilma Rudolph Blvd.Clarksville TN Ingersoll Rand - Trane North America 37040 Steven Maddox US 5005 York Dr Norman OKJohnson Controls 73069 John McLaughlin US john.mclaughlin@daikinmcqu ay.com Auburn NY Diakin McQuay 13021 David Mecadon US 539 Dunksferry Road Bensalem PA National Refrigeration and Air Conditioning 19020 Richie Mohan US 2111 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 500 Arlington VA AHRI 22201 John Morris US 539 Dunksferry rd Bensalem PA Continental Refrigerator19020 Frank Myers US 3209 Galvez Avenue Fort Worth TX PVI Industries, LLC76111 David Ransom US 500 N. Capitol Street Washington DC McDermott Will & Emery20155

wes roan US 1914 Randolph Dr. Bryan OH Bard Manufacturing Co., Inc. 43506 Joe Sanders US 4401 Blue Mound Rd. Fort Worth TX Traulsen 76106 chris Thompson US 2175 West Park Place BlvdStone Mountain GAAHRI 30087 Eric Truskoski US 200 Lafayette Street Middleville MI Bradford White Corporation 49333 Tom Walsh US 4900 Technology Park BlvdAuburn NY Daikin McQuay 13021 kevin washington US 1250 conn ave nw washington DC itw 20036 Michael Woodford US 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite # 500 Arlington VA AHRI 22201 Wes Wostal US 7300 SW 44th St. Oklahoma City OK ClimateMaster 73179 

# General Information
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 65329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28029]



[[Page 65329]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA--03325 and 03325AA]


Levi Strauss & Company Wichita Falls Plant, Wichita Falls, TX and 
Walnut Creek Road Office, Walnut Creek, CA; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for NAFTA-Transitional Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), the Department 
of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for NAFTA 
Transitional Adjustment Assistance on August 11, 1999, applicable to 
workers of Levi Strauss & Company, Wichita Falls Plant, Wichita Falls, 
Texas. The notice was published in the Federal Register on September 
29, 1999 (64 FR 52543). The certification document was amended several 
times to include numerous facilities located at various locations.
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of denim and Docker apparel. The company reports that 
worker separations occurred at the Walnut Creek Road Office of Levi 
Strauss located in Walnut Creek, California. The Walnut Creek Road 
Office is a satellite office of the subject firms' headquarters in San 
Francisco, California and directly supports Levi Strauss's many 
production facilities. The intent of the Department's certification is 
to include all workers of Levi Strauss and Company who were adversely 
affected by increased imports of denim and Docker apparel from Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA--03325 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Levi Strauss & Company, Wichita Falls Plant, 
Wichita Falls, Texas (NAFTA-03325) and Walnut Creek Road Office, 
Walnut Creek, California (NAFTA-03325AA) who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after August 8, 1999 
through August 11, 2001 are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under 
Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.


    Signed in Washington, DC this 19th day of October, 2000.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-28029 Filed 10-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### DAUGHERTY v. STATE.

No. 22701.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 20, 1943.

Burns & Burns, of Huntsville, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

In an original application made returnable to this court, W. N. Daugherty seeks release from the penitentiary from a conviction in Dallam County on a charge of robbery with firearms. His sentence is dated November 30, 1936, and confines him in the1 state penitentiary for his natural life. The case was submitted to the jury on the one count and it returned its verdict assessing the penalty at confinement in the penitentiary for life.

 The penalty fixed by act of the legislature for the offense charged is death or for a term of years in the penitentiary not less than five. Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 1408. Appellant was received in the penitentiary on the 30th day of November, 1936, and has served more than the minimum penalty.

Under the holding of this court in Ex parte Erwin, 170 S.W.2d 226, he will be entitled to his release on the ground that that part of the sentence confining him to the penitentiary for life is void and the State concedes that the facts of the case are the same and that the rule announced in the Erwin case is applicable. Contention is made, however, that such holding was error and that the case should now be overruled. The case of Bailey v." United States, 10 Cir., 74 F.2d 451, is relied upon.

Appellant was confined in the penitentiary by virtue of an act of the legislature, the construction of which is not necessarily determined by the construction given to even a similar act of Congress by a Federal court. It is the duty of this court to construe the laws in accordance with the intention of the legislature and the powers vested in it by the Constitution. When an act is identical with a Federal statute which has been previously construed judicially, we will be inclined to follow the construction given by a Federal court on the theory that it was known to the legislature and that the Federal act was copied with the intention that the statute would be given the same construction. Such is not the history of the law with which we are concerned. In the first place, it is not sufficiently similar to the Federal law under consideration by the circuit court in the Bailey case nor did that construction precede the enactment of the law involved. The legislature has, in some cases, provided for life sentences and in others, for a term of years. It appears that such has been done with care and caution. We are unable to find that *494they have, in any case, used the two expressions interchangeably as meaning the same thing and there is no basis for a conclusion that they did. In the absence of such practice, we have heretofore reached the conclusion that the expressions are used in a technical sense; that the intention is clearly expressed and that this court should follow it. That holding will be adhered to.

The writ is granted as prayed for and the relator is ordered discharged from further custody under the judgment pleaded.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of

-- )

)

Facility Defense Consultants, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 61145, 61315, 61316

d/b/a Hanke Constructors ) 61317, 61414, 61558

)

Under Contract No. W912DQ

- 14

- D

- 4003 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Leonard R. Ruzicka

, Jr., Esq.

Ruzicka Law Firm, LLC

St. Louis, M O

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Kristine R. Hoffman, Esq.

Virginia Murray, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney s

U.S. Army Engineer District, Kansas City

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The se appeals are dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: July 2 , 2020

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 61145, 61315, 61316, 61317,

61414, 61558

, Appeals of Facility Defense Cons ultants, Inc. d/b/a Hanke Constructors

, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: July 2, 2020 CHRISTOPHER M. MCNULTY

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services2 Board of Contract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FRONTIER TELEPHONE OF ROCHESTER'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX
MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000936105
<NAME> FRONTIER TELEPHONE OF ROCHESTER
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          40,285
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,339
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,579
<INVENTORY>                                        446
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,056
<PP&E>                                         957,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                 612,854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 470,701
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,293
<BONDS>                                         40,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       232,165
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   470,701
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               167,003
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (656)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,881
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,665
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,216
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,216
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27263]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-547-001]


High Island Offshore System, L.L.C.; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 18, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 13, 2000, High Island Offshore System, 
L.L.C. (HIOS), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Third Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 130. 
HIOS requests that this sheet be made effective October 1, 2000.
    HIOS states that the tendered sheet is being filed in compliance 
with the Commission's October 4 Letter Order issued in Docket No. RP00-
547-000.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. The filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/onliner/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27263 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M