alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3438 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3438

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize use of grants 
    under the Urban Area Security Initiative and the State Homeland 
  Security Grant Program to work in conjunction with a Department of 
                      Energy national laboratory.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Laboratories Mean National 
Security Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT FUNDS IN CONJUNCTION WITH 
              DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL LABORATORIES.

    Section 2008(a) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 
609(a)) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by inserting 
``including by working in conjunction with a National Laboratory (as 
defined in section 2(3) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 
15801(3)),'' after ``plans,''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 1, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3438

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize use of grants 
    under the Urban Area Security Initiative and the State Homeland 
  Security Grant Program to work in conjunction with a Department of 
                      Energy national laboratory.
```
#### Filemon GARCIA, appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, appellee.

No. 23793.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 17, 1948.

For original opinion see 207 S.W.2d 877.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant requests leave to file second motion for rehearing, basing it upon the fact that his attorneys did not receive notice from the Clerk of this Court that their request for original submission had been postponed to the date requested, hence they were deprived of opportunity of submitting oral argument, and had no brief on file when the case was submitted. Appellant’s attorneys argued the case on rehearing and had their brief then before the Court, and we had the benefit of all authorities cited therein at the time the opinion on rehearing was prepared.

Believing the case has been properly decided, and nothing appearing in the requested second motion to change our views, leave to file same is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<CIK>                                    0000937598
<NAME>                                 Periphonics Corporation
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         SEP-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                       13,227
<SECURITIES>                                 10,690
<RECEIVABLES>                                32,547
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (878)
<INVENTORY>                                  14,676
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             72,944
<PP&E>                                       37,006
<DEPRECIATION>                              (18,978)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               91,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        16,923
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        137
<OTHER-SE>                                   73,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 91,395
<SALES>                                      28,591
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             28,591
<CGS>                                        15,095
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                15,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             12,565
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,480
<INCOME-TAX>                                    555
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             925
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    925
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,568
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               2
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                11,825
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     28,020
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          28,208
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        136,754
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 219,249
<DEPOSITS>                                     181,543
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,876
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           265
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 219,249
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,893
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  645
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   112
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,650
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,767
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,767
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,883
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       20
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 200
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    983
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         983
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       785
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        127
<LOANS-PAST>                                       790
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   152
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    936
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,254
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        8
<RECOVERIES>                                        25
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,271
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,271
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            783
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                          <C>                <C>               
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS              3-MOS             
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1998         DEC-31-1998  
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1998         JAN-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1998         MAR-31-1998  
<CASH>                                 5,612               9,468  
<SECURITIES>                               0                   0  
<RECEIVABLES>                         41,505              39,155  
<ALLOWANCES>                         (3,694)             (3,388)  
<INVENTORY>                            1,363               1,399  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      51,219              53,056  
<PP&E>                                48,464              44,377  
<DEPRECIATION>                      (21,320)            (20,413)  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       171,655             167,366  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 25,843              30,766  
<BONDS>                               23,095              19,204  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0                   0  
<PREFERRED>                                0                   0  
<COMMON>                                 126                 125  
<OTHER-SE>                           121,589             115,602  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         171,655             167,366  
<SALES>                                3,550               1,766  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     113,167              54,788  
<CGS>                                  2,657               1,341  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         96,264              46,743  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       (136)                (47)  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         439                 186  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       552                 192  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       12,476               5,986  
<INCOME-TAX>                           4,989               2,392  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    7,487               3,594  
<DISCONTINUED>                             0                   0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0                   0  
<CHANGES>                                  0                   0  
<NET-INCOME>                           7,487               3,594  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.60                0.29  
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.59                0.28   
        

</TABLE>
Lighthouse Product Services

3937 Cedarwood Lane Johnstown, CO 80534 

970-313-6654 sbaker@lhpsonline.com

January 11, 2011

Office of Pesticide Programs (Inert)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Document Processing Desk (IIAB)

Room S-4900, One Potomac Yard 

2777 S. Crystal Drive 

Arlington, VA 22202

Subject: Petition for the Exemption from Requirement of Tolerance for Kerosene CAS 

#8008-20-6

EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0803

Lighthouse Product Services, Regulatory Agent on behalf of Winfield Solutions LLC, is 

respectfully submitting this request for "withdrawal without prejudice" of the Petition for the 

Exemption from Requirement of Tolerance for Kerosene CAS #8008-20-6; EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-

0803.

Further to the withdrawal request we are also asking for a meeting with IIAB to discuss the 2006 

re-assessment when this ingredient was re-assessed for use in pesticide formulations for use in 

animals. We would specifically like your input on what additional data EPA would be looking for 

in order for us to re-submit this petition or one for another alternate, similar solvent. The CPDA 

Spring meeting will be taking place February 15th - 17th, we would like to schedule a meeting 

around that if possible.

Please contact me at 970-313-6654 or by e-mail: sbaker@lhpsonline.com if there are any 

questions or comments concerning this submission.

Sincerely,

Scott Baker

Agent for Winfield Solutions LLC
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 99-2086

CHRISTIAN CASTRO,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

[Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Torruella, Chief Judge,

Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.

Christian Castro on brief pro se.

Jay P. McCloskey, United States Attorney, and F. Mark

Terison, Senior Litigation Counsel, on brief for appellee.

September 6, 2000
-2-

Per Curiam. After a thorough review of the record

and of the parties’ submissions, we affirm. 

Even if appellant Christian Castro (“Castro”) had

adequately alleged in his § 2255 petition that his counsel

fell below the standard of care – a matter we do not decide

– Castro wholly failed to establish that any alleged

failure on counsel’s part caused him prejudice. Strickland

v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984). “A defendant who

enters a guilty plea is not entitled to an adjustment under

[U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1] as a matter of right.” See U.S.S.G. §

3E1.1, app. note 3; see also United States v. Muriel, 111

F.3d 975, 982 (1st Cir. 1997). Rather, the court must

consider a number of factors, including whether defendant

“truthfully admit[s] the conduct comprising the offense[] of

conviction.” U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, app. note 1(a). Castro

indicates he would only have been willing to enter into a

plea pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25

(1970), so he has failed to allege he would have “truthfully

admitted” that he had conspired to distribute cocaine base.
-3-

Further, he has not alleged that he could have

earned a section 3E1.1 reduction by pointing to any other

factor listed in application note 1; and we see no

indication in the record that he could have supported any

such allegation. See generally United States v. Burns, 925

F.2d 18, 20-21 (1st Cir. 1991) (defendant entered Alford

plea; court properly denied section 3E1.1 reduction where

evidence as a whole indicated a lack of acceptance of

responsibility). Thus, Castro failed to show any reasonable

probability that the result at his sentencing would have

been different had his attorney convinced him to plead

guilty, Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694; so the lower court did

not err in denying him an evidentiary hearing on his

ineffective assistance of counsel claim. See United States

v. McGill, 11 F.3d 223, 225-26 (1st Cir. 1993) (“[A] § 2255

motion may be denied without a hearing as to those

allegations which, if accepted as true, entitled the movant

to no relief. . . .”).

Affirmed. 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27(c).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM REMEDY
CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          54,678
<SECURITIES>                                   138,170
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,613
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,284
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               265,863
<PP&E>                                          38,183
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 310,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,910
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     240,003
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   310,933
<SALES>                                         35,420
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,932
<CGS>                                            2,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,439
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,573
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,468
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 1, 2015 

# Order

September 1, 2015

152182 ( 19 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

FREDERICK MARTEZ MARTIN

, Defendant

- Appell ant

. SC: 152182

COA: 325070

Wayne CC: 09

- 023095

- FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellant for leave to file a

brief in excess of the page limit restriction is GRANTED. The 79

- page brief submitted

on August 19, 2015, is accepted for filing.
Exhibit 32.2


                                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust IV and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P. (the
"Partnership") for the period ended December 26, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas W. Perry, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co.,
Inc., the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
             all material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Partnership.



                             MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.

                             By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                             By:  /s/ THOMAS W. PERRY
                                 --- -------------------------------------
                             Name:    Thomas W. Perry*
                             Title:   Chief Accounting Officer and Controller



Dated: March 26, 2009
-----------------------
* Thomas W. Perry functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

            In connection with the quarterly report of PC Mall, Inc., a Delawarecorporation, and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"Report"), I, Ted Sanders, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

                   (1)  the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

                   (2)  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.  

              This Certification has notbeen, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.
The May 1, 2008 Packaged Terminal Air Conditioners (PTACs) and Heat Pumps (PTHPs)

Public Meeting Transcript is up on our webpage and is available for viewing in PDF format. 

The link is below:

http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/ptacs_pthps_nopr.html 

As a reminder, the public comment period closes on Midnight June 7th. But will accept

comments until 4 PM Monday June 9th. Please follow the procedures for submitting comments

outlined both in the Federal Register Notice and on our webpage. 

Sincerely,

WES

Wes Anderson

Mechanical Engineer

Building Technologies Program

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy

U. S. Department of Energy

202-586-7335

kamrane@ari.org

wes.anderson@ee.doe.gov

Ashley.Armstrong@NavigantConsulting.com

brice.bowley@ge.com

mikeb@ptacs.com

Adelaski1@aol.com

jeff.empie@mcquay.com

dgoldstein@nrdc.org

tom.guffey@amanahvac.com

jill.hootman@trane.com

EARL.F.JONES@GE.COM

pkendrick@friedrich.com

kkennedy@nrdc.org

john.kingsbury@goodmanmfg.com

bill.kleftis@ecrinternational.com

bing.lui@pnl.gov

david.markusz@carrier.utc.com

mmartin@energy.state.ca.us

jim.mckallip@mcquay.com

cmiro@ashrae.org

misuriello@ase.org

steven_nadel@aceee.org

patlovichdt@trane.com

tom.phillips@carrier.utc.com

srosenstock@eei.org

drossin@navigantconsulting.com

hsachs@aceee.org

michael.scott@pnl.gov

sriram.somasundaram@pnl.gov

maryann.stojkovski@mcquay.com

scotou@ecrinternational.com

twheeler@friedrich.com

robert.whitwell@carrier.utc.com

kamrane@ari.org

wes.anderson@ee.doe.gov

Ashley.Armstrong@NavigantConsulting.com

James.Benz@ge.com

PublicSolutions@earthlink.net

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0012 COMMENT 13
Ronald.Lewis@ee.doe.gov

JMATTINGLY@AHRINET.ORG

Francine.Pinto@hq.doe.gov

Eric.Stas@hq.doe.gov

ecr1@erols.com

tom.guffey@amanahvac.com

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0012 COMMENT 13
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 3, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132029 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ANTOINETTE LONG, as Next Friend of Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Dounika Long, a Minor, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 132029 

 COA: 266948 
 Wayne CC: 02-243011-NH

CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN, 

ALEXA CANADY, M.D., SANDEEP SOOD,

M.D., and PEDIATRIC NEUROSURGERY 

GROUP, P.C., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 1, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals for 

the reason that the insanity saving provision of MCL 600.5851(1) applies to the 

plaintiff’s medical malpractice claims. Vega v Lakeland Hospitals at Niles and St 

Joseph, Inc, 479 Mich 243 (2007). We REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court 

for further proceedings consistent with this order. 

t0926 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 3, 2007 

 Clerk