alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 65899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28073]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0090]


Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Veterans 
Health Administration (VHA), Department of Veterans Affairs, has 
submitted the collection of information abstracted below to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The PRA 
submission describes the nature of the information collection and its 
expected cost and burden; it includes the actual data collection 
instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before December 4, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY OF THE SUBMISSION CONTACT: Denise 
McLamb, Information Management Service (045A4), Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-8135 
or FAX (202) 273-5981. Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-0090.''

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Application for Voluntary Service, VA Form 10-7055.
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0090.
    Type of Review: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired.
    Abstract: VA Form 10-7055 is used to assist personnel in selection, 
screening, and placement of volunteers in the nationwide VA Voluntary 
Service Program.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The Federal Register Notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of 
information was published on June 22, 1999 at page 33344.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households, Not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 7,500 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: One time.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 30,000.
    Send comments and recommendations concerning any aspect of the 
information collection to VA's Desk Officer, OMB Human Resources and 
Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, 
DC 20503 (202) 395-7316. Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-0090'' 
in any correspondence.

    Dated: September 25, 2000.

    By direction of the Acting Secretary.
Donald L. Neilson,
 Director, Information Management Service.
[FR Doc. 00-28073 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64262-64263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27623]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY


Sunshine Act Meeting

TYPE: Quarterly meeting.

AGENCY: National Council On Disability.

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of the 
forthcoming quarterly meeting of the National Council on Disability. 
Notice of this meeting is required under Section 522b(e)(1) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, (Pub. L. 94-409).

QUARTERLY MEETING DATES: December 4-6, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

LOCATION: San Diego Marriott Hotel & Marina, 333 West Harbor Drive, San 
Diego, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark S. Quigley, Public Affairs 
Specialist, National Council on Disability, 1331 F Street NW., Suite 
1050, Washington, DC 20004-1107; 202-272-2004 (Voice), 202-272-2074 
(TTY), 202-272-2022 (Fax).

AGENCY MISSION: The National Council on Disability is an independent 
federal agency composed of 15 members appointed by the President and 
confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Its overall purpose is to promote 
policies, programs, practices, and procedures that guarantee equal 
opportunity for all people with disabilities, regardless of the nature 
of severity of the disability; and to empower people with disabilities 
to achieve economic self-sufficiency, independent living, and inclusion 
and integration into all aspect of society.

ACCOMMODATIONS:  Those needing interpreters or other accommodations 
should notify the National Council on Disability prior to this meeting.

ENVIRONMENTAL ILLNESS: People with environmental illness must reduce 
their exposure to volatile chemical substances in order to attend this

[[Page 64263]]

meeting. In order to reduce such exposure, we ask that you not wear 
perfumes or scents at the meeting. We also ask that you smoke only in 
designated areas and the privacy of your room. Smoking is prohibited in 
the meeting room and surrounding area.

OPEN MEETING: This quarterly meeting of the National Council on 
Disability will be open to the public.

AGENDA: The proposed agenda includes:

Reports from the Chairperson and the Executive Director
Committee Meetings and Committee Reports
Executive Session (closed)
Unfinished Business
New Business
Announcements
Adjournment

    Records will be kept of all National Council on Disability 
proceedings and will be available after the meeting for public 
inspection at the National Council on Disability.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on October 23, 2000.
Ethel D. Briggs,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 00-27623 Filed 10-23-00; 4:47 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-MA-M
1 

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA 

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS 

Tammy Y. Daniel, 

Claimant Below, Petitioner 

v.) No. 23-324 (JCN: 2020021356) 

 (ICA No. 22-ICA-291) 

 

FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., 

Employer Below, Respondent 

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Petitioner Tammy Y. Daniel appeals the April 10, 2023, memorandum decision of the 

Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia (“ICA”). See Daniel v. FedEx Ground Package 

System, Inc., No. 22-ICA-291, 2023 WL 2861731 (W. Va. Ct. App. Apr. 10, 2023) (memorandum 

decision). Respondent FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. filed a timely response.1 The issue on 

appeal is whether the ICA erred in affirming the November 9, 2022, decision of the West Virginia 

Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, which affirmed the claim administrator’s order denying 

authorization requests for an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at C5-C6, a neurological 

referral, and a pain management referral. 

The claimant asserts that the surgical procedure and the two referrals are medically 

necessary and reasonably related to the compensable injury. The employer maintains that the 

claimant points to no erroneous procedure, no arbitrary or capricious conclusions, and no abuse of 

discretion or jurisdictional error by the tribunals below. 

This Court reviews questions of law de novo, while we accord deference to the Board of 

Review’s findings of fact unless the findings are clearly wrong. Syl. Pt. 3, Duff v. Kanawha Cnty. 

Comm’n, No. 23-43, 2024 WL 1715166 (W. Va. Apr. 22, 2024). Upon consideration of the record 

and briefs, we find no reversible error and therefore summarily affirm. See W. Va. R. App. P. 

21(c). 

 Affirmed. 

1

 The petitioner is represented by counsel Reginald D. Henry and Lori J. Withrow, and the 

respondent is represented by counsel H. Dill Battle, III. 

FILED 

August 27, 2024 

C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK 

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS 

OF WEST VIRGINIA 
2 

ISSUED: August 27, 2024 

CONCURRED IN BY: 

Chief Justice Tim Armstead 

Justice Elizabeth D. Walker 

Justice John A. Hutchison 

Justice William R. Wooton 

Justice C. Haley Bunn
## NUMBER 13
- 2 2
- 00 0 85
- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN THE INTEREST OF J.M.B., R.P.B. III, I.V.B., CHILDREN

On a ppeal from the 214 th District C ourt of Nueces County, Texas.



## ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Benavides , Hinojosa, and Silva Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on its own motion. On July 14, 2022, the Court

received a court reporter’s request for extension indicat ing that appellant has f ai led to request a reporter’s record and has not made arrangements for paying for the record. On July 15, 2022, the Clerk of the Court sent notice to appellant of that defect. On August 2, 2022, we received appellant’s response indicating the reporter’s record has been requested and declarations of inability to pay filed with the trial court. The c lerk’s record confirms appellant submitted a request for reporter’s record and declaration of inability to2 pay to the trial court.

W e now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

1. Whether appellant is indigent;

2. Whether appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to indigency; and

3. Whether appellant has been provi ded a complete copy of the appellate record. If the trial court determines that appellant is indigent and entitled to a free appellate record, the trial court shall make any orders necessary to ensure appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appe llate record. The trial court shall cause its finding s and recommendations, together with any orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental

cler k ’ s record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporte r ’ s record of proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental cler k ’ s record and supplemental reporte r ’ s record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration thirty days from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the 18th day of August , 202 2

.
External Power Supply Product Classes and Trial Standard Levels

Product Class Annual 

Shipments 

(million units)

TSL 1 TSL 2 TSL 3

# Description

B

DC Output, 

Basic Voltage

2.5 W (0-10.25 W) 69

193

CSL 2 CSL 3 CSL 4

18 W (10.25-39 W) 70

60 W (39-90 W) 48

120 W (91-250 W) 7

C DC Output, Low Voltage 59

D AC Output, Basic Voltage 8

E AC Output, Low Voltage 2

X Multiple Voltage 8 CSL 1 CSL 2 CSL 3

H High Power 0.003 CSL 2 CSL 3 CSL 4

N Indirect Operation 75 Not Analyzed
Battery Charger Product Classes and Trial Standard Levels

Product Class InputOutput

Type

Battery 

Energy

Special 

Characteristic 

or Battery 

Voltage

Annual 

Shipments 

(million 

units)

TSL 1 TSL 2 TSL 3 TSL 4

# Description

1 Low Energy, Inductive

AC In,

DC Out

< 100 Wh

Inductive 

Connection 15 CSL 1 CSL 2 CSL 3

2 Low Energy, Low Voltage < 4 V 249 CSL 1 CSL 2 CSL 3 CSL 4

3 Low Energy, Medium Voltage 4–10 V 23 CSL 1 CSL 1 CSL 2 CSL 3

4 Low Energy, High Voltage > 10 V 61 CSL 1 CSL 1 CSL 2 CSL 3

5 Medium Energy, Low Voltage

100–3000 Wh

< 20 V 5 CSL 1 CSL 2 CSL 3

6 Medium Energy, High Voltage ≥ 20 V 0.6 CSL 1 CSL 2 CSL 3

7 High Energy > 3000 Wh 0.2 CSL 1 CSL 2

8 Low Voltage DC Input

DC In,

DC Out

< 9 V Input 65 CSL 1 CSL 2 CSL 3

9 High Voltage DC Input ≥ 9 V Input 10 No TSLs Defined

10a

AC Output AC In,

AC Out

Without AVR

8 CSL 1 CSL 2 CSL 3

10b With AVR
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1441. THE STATE v. PAYNE.

This case was docketed by this Court on May 14, 2021. The State’s brief and

enumeration of errors were originally due on June 3, 2021. As of the date of this

order, the State has still not filed a brief and enumeration of errors. The filing is 221

days late. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby deemed abandoned and DISMISSED

pursuant to Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a). See also Court of Appeals Rule 13.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this order to the State’s

attorney in this case.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

January 10, 2022

01/10/2022
Exhibit
32





Certifications
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





The
undersigned, who are the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer
of Synalloy Corporation, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge, the accompanying Form 10-Q of the issuer fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and that information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
issuer.











October 31,
      2008
            s/Ronald
      H.BraamRonald
      H. Braam
              Chief
      Executive Officers/Gregory M.
      BowieGregory
      M. Bowie
              Vice
      President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer
exv10w13



 





Exhibit 10.13




AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.

2006 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION SUMMARY



2006 Base Salary and Option Grants. For fiscal 2006, each named executive officer will receive the
base salary set forth below (effective as of February 1, 2006), and has been granted an option to
purchase the number of shares of Company common stock set forth below. All options were granted
under the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $21.38 (equal to the “fair
market value” of a share of common stock on the grant date), vest over a period of 4 years and have
a term of 7 years.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	2006 Base	 	2006
	Name	 	Title	 	Salary	 	Options
	Martin J. Emerson

	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	$	330,000	 	 	 	100,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Carmen L. Diersen

	 	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Corporate Secretary
	 	$	263,000	 	 	 	50,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Ross A. Longhini

	 	Executive Vice President and Chief
Technology Officer
	 	$	258,000	 	 	 	50,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Lawrence W. Getlin

	 	Senior Vice President, Regulatory Medical
Affairs and Quality Systems, Corporate
Compliance Officer
	 	$	228,000	 	 	 	25,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	John F. Nealon

	 	Senior Vice President, Business Development
	 	$	220,000	 	 	 	25,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Douglas W. Kohrs

	 	Chairman of the Board
	 	$	100,000	 	 	 	20,000	 





2006
Executive Variable Incentive Plan. Executive officers are also
eligible to receive incentive compensation under the 2006 Executive
Variable Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee (and the Board of Directors with respect to
executive officers) established a target bonus for each participant in the plan. The 2006 quarterly
bonus payments will be calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter based upon each fiscal
quarter’s year-over-year sales growth rate, each quarter’s year-over-year increase in sales
dollars, a measure of operating income and a cost of capital on net assets. Each quarter, the
actual quarterly results for four quarters (the current plus three past quarters) will be weighted
and compared to the plan level to generate a percent of plan achievement. This percent is applied
against the participant’s target bonus for the quarter, resulting in a quarterly bonus payment per
individual. The target bonus for 2006 for each named executive officer is set forth in the table
below.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	2006 Target
	Name	 	Title	 	Bonus
	Martin J. Emerson

	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	$	198,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Carmen L. Diersen

	 	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Corporate Secretary
	 	$	118,350	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Ross A. Longhini

	 	Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
	 	$	116,100	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Lawrence W. Getlin

	 	Senior Vice President, Regulatory Medical Affairs
and Quality Systems, Corporate Compliance Officer
	 	$	91,200	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	John F. Nealon

	 	Senior Vice President, Business Development
	 	$	88,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Douglas W. Kohrs

	 	Chairman of the Board
	 	$	50,000
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3201 

To amend the National Coal Heritage Area Act of 1996 to reauthorize 

the Augusta Canal National Heritage Area. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2013 

Mr. BARROW of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Coal Heritage Area Act of 1996 

to reauthorize the Augusta Canal National Heritage Area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Augusta Canal Na5 tional Heritage Area Reauthorization Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUGUSTA CANAL NATIONAL 

7 HERITAGE AREA. 

8 Section 310 of the National Coal Heritage Area Act 

9 of 1996 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; Division II of Public Law 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3201 IH

1 104–333) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2013’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2023’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### SHACKELFORD v. STATE.

No. 25809.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 9, 1952.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful sale of an alcoholic beverage in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $500.

The complaint and information appear regular.

*564The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions; and nothing being presented for review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### MEADOR v. STATE.

No. 23565.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 22, 1947.

No appearance, for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Cr. Dist. Atty., and E. T. Branch, Asst. Cr. Dist. Atty., both of Houston, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*907BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a sentence of, seven years in the penitentiary on a charge of theft from the person.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The proceedings appear regular. There are no objections to the court’s charge. Nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Filed 9/24/ 21 In re Wilson CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re

JOSEPH WILSON,

On Habeas Corpus. F083030

(Kings Super. Ct. No. 95CM1143 )

O PINION

THE COURT *
ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of habeas corpus.
Joseph Wilson, in propria persona, for Petitioner.

Rob Bonta , Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, and

Max Feinstat , Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.

- ooOoo

Petitioner seeks permission to file a belated notice of appeal under the constructive
filing doctrine set forth in In re Benoit (1973) 10 Cal.3d 73 ( Benoit ). In an informal
response, the Attorney General contends petitioner “failed to explain the approximate

11

- month delay between receiving the trial court’s order and attempting to appeal ....”
While we recognize this delay was substantial, we conclude petitioner has demonstrated
adequate justificat ion for the delay. Based on the record provided, it appears the trial
court erroneously failed to appoint petitioner counsel after filing a facially sufficient

* Before Poochigian , Acting P.J., Peña , J. and DeSantos, J.2

Penal Code section 1170.95 petition. ( People v. Lewis (2021) 11 Cal.5th 952.) We

conclude thi s failure significantly undermined petitioner’s ability to effectuate his right to
appeal the denial of his Penal Code section 1170.95 resentencing petition.
Accordingly, we conclude petitioner is entitled to relief.

DISPOSITION

Petitioner is granted leave to file a notice of appeal on or before 60 days from the
date of this order in Kings County Superior Court action No. 95CM1143.
Let a writ of mandate issue directing the Clerk of the Superior Court for Kings
County to file said request in its action number No. 95CM1143, to treat it as timely filed,
and to proceed with the preparation of the record on appeal in accordance with the
applicable rules of the California Rules of Court if the clerk of that court receives said
request on or before 60 days of the date of this order.
This opinion is final forthwith as to this court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6991

FREDRICK LYNWOOD FOLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MS. WOOD,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-96-191)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fredrick Lynwood Foley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. The district court

dismissed Appellant's complaint for failure to state a claim on

which relief could be granted. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foley v. Wood,

No. CA 96-191 (W.D. Va. June 12, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Famous Fixins, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley Tepper,
Chief Finacial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.






                                                  /s/ Stanley Tepper
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Stanley Tepper
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  April  9, 2003

<PAGE>
## ji

STATE OFLOUISIANA VERSUS JEROME GRAY NO. 

### 2023KW 1308

In Re: Jerome 

## Gray, applying for 

### supervisory writs, 18th

Judicial District Court, Parish of Iberville, No. 267- 16. BEFORE: THERIOT, PENZATO, AND GREENE, JJ.



### WRITDENIED. MRT ARP HG