alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Ralph R. Erickson, United St ates District Judge for the District of North Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-2444

___________ Frederick W. Keiser, Jr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of North Dakota. Christopher Johnson; Jasmine H. * Dzhanszyan; Law Firm of Cr iminal * [UNPUBLISHED] Defense Associates; Drew H. Wrigley, * United States Attorney, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: June 23, 2008 Filed: July 10, 2008

___________ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Frederick W. Keiser, Jr., appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his complaint against his former criminal defense attorneys and the United States Attorney for the District of North Dakota, in which Keis er sought damages for violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organi zations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, state-2- law fraud, and “attorney disc ipline,” and requested a writ of mandamus to compel the United States Attorney to bring a criminal prosecution. After carefully reviewing the record and Keiser’s arguments on appeal , we find no basis fo r reversal. SeeBenton v. Merrill Lynch & Co. , 524 F.3d 866, 870 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. We also grant the motion to strike the documents in Keiser’s adde ndum and appendix that were not contained in the record below, and we deny Keiser’s request to s upplement the record. See Dakota Indus., Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc. , 988 F.2d 61, 63 (8th Cir. 1993) (appellate court generally cannot consider evidence not contained in record below).

______________________________
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Airspace Docket No. 2000-ASW-18]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. 

      ( print page 66169)    

# SUMMARY:

This notice confirms the effective date of a direct final rule which revises the Class D Airspace at Robert Gray Army Airfield, TX. and revokes the Class D Airspace at Hood Army Airfield, TX.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

The direct final rule published at 65 FR 54950 is effective 0901 UTC, November 30, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, Fort Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 817-222-5593.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 12, 2000, (65 FR 54950). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on November 30, 2000. No adverse comments were received and, thus, this action confirms that this direct final rule will be effective on that date.                

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on October 27, 2000.

Robert N. Stevens,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.

[FR Doc. 00-28291 Filed 11-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

*Date & Time:*                         Tuesday, November 7, 2000 at 10 a.m.                    

*Place:*                         999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.                    

*Status:*                         This meeting will be closed to the public.                    

*Items to be Discussed:*                         Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g. Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration. Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.                    

*Date & Time:*                     Thursday, November 9, 2000 at 10 a.m.                

*Place:*                     999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. (Ninth Floor).                

*Status:*                     This meeting will be open to the public.                

*Items to be Discussed:*                     Correction and Approval of Minutes.                

General Public Political Communications Coordinated with Candidates and Independent Expenditures: Draft Final Rules with Explanation and Justification.

Administrative Matters.

*Person to Contact for Information:*                     Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.                

Mary W. Dove,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-28161  Filed 10-30-00; 2:08 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 338 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 338

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to include certain territories 
and possessions of the United States in the definition of State for the 
    purposes of chapter 114, relating to trafficking in contraband 
                   cigarettes and smokeless tobacco.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2013

   Mr. Faleomavaega (for himself, Mr. Sablan, Ms. Bordallo, and Mr. 
  Pierluisi) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to include certain territories 
and possessions of the United States in the definition of State for the 
    purposes of chapter 114, relating to trafficking in contraband 
                   cigarettes and smokeless tobacco.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Tobacco Smuggling in the 
Territories Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS OF THE UNITED STATES INCLUDED IN 
              THE DEFINITION OF STATE FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE 
              PROHIBITION AGAINST TRAFFICKING IN CONTRABAND CIGARETTES 
              AND SMOKELESS TOBACCO.

    Paragraph (4) of section 2341 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``or the Virgin Islands'' and inserting ``the 
Virgin Islands, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern 
Mariana Islands, or Guam''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3510 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to repeal the suspension of 

eligibility for grants, loans, and work assistance for drug-related offenses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2013 

Ms. BASS (for herself, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, and Ms. WILSON of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to repeal 

the suspension of eligibility for grants, loans, and work 

assistance for drug-related offenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stopping Unfair Col5 lateral Consequences from Ending Student Success Act’’ 

6 or ‘‘SUCCESS Act’’. 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3510 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUSPENSION OF ELIGIBILITY UNDER 

2 THE HIGHER EDUCATION ACT OF 1965 FOR 

3 GRANTS, LOANS, AND WORK ASSISTANCE FOR 

4 DRUG-RELATED OFFENSES. 

5 (a) REPEAL.—Subsection (r) of section 484 of the 

6 Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1091(r)) is re7 pealed. 

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The Higher Edu9 cation Act of 1965 is amended— 

10 (1) in section 428(b)(3) (20 U.S.C. 

11 1078(b)(3))— 

12 (A) in subparagraph (C), by striking 

13 ‘‘485(l)’’ and inserting ‘‘485(k)’’; and 

14 (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking 

15 ‘‘485(l)’’ and inserting ‘‘485(k)’’; 

16 (2) in section 435(d)(5) (20 U.S.C. 

17 1085(d)(5))— 

18 (A) in subparagraph (E), by striking 

19 ‘‘485(l)’’ and inserting ‘‘485(k)’’; and 

20 (B) in subparagraph (F), by striking 

21 ‘‘485(l)’’ and inserting ‘‘485(k)’’; 

22 (3) in section 484 (20 U.S.C. 1091), by redes23 ignating subsections (s) and (t) as subsections (r) 

24 and (s), respectively; and 

25 (4) in section 485 (20 U.S.C. 1092)— 

26 (A) by striking subsection (k); and 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3510 IH

1 (B) by redesignating subsections (l) and 

2 (m) as subsections (k) and (l), respectively. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 214 (Friday, November 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 66260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28243]



[[Page 66260]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37,981]


Adirondack Knitting Mills, Amsterdam, NY; Dismissal of 
Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Adirondack Knitting Mills, 
Amsterdam, New York. The application contained no new substantial 
information which would bear importantly on the Department's 
determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-37,981; Adirondack Knitting Mills Amsterdam, New York (October 
25, 2000).

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 26th day of October, 2000.
Edward A. Tomchick,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-28243 Filed 11-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-60185

Conference Calendar

 

GURMIT SINGH,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A-93-499-484

- - - - - - - - - -

February 17, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Gurmit Singh petitions this court to review the decision of

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his application for

asylum. He challenges the Immigration Judge’s adverse

credibility determination. We do not review decisions based upon

credibility determinations. See Chun v. INS, 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th

Cir. 1994). Singh’s petition for review is DENIED.
#### The State, ex rel. Haskins, Appellant, *v.*Tyroler, Judge, Appellee.

(No. 28117

Decided May 29, 1940.)

*25
      *Messrs. Dunifon & Topper,*for appellant.

No appearance of record for appellee.

By the Court.

The Civil Service Commission of Ohio placed the position of county visitor of Athens county in the classified civil service. The relatrix passed a competitive examination, was certified on an eligible list, was appointed by the juvenile judge and was assigned to aid-to-dependent-children work.

She continued in that position until the juvenile judge discharged her by letter stating she was removed as county visitor because of unsatisfactory work. The state Civil Service Commission was notified and entered her removal upon its records. The duties formerly performed by relatrix were assigned to another employee of the Juvenile Court who was not in the classified service.

The relatrix contended the respondent failed to comply with Section 486-17a, General Code, which requires giving of reasons for removal and affording a reasonable time to file an explanation.

The respondent maintained that the position occupied by the relatrix was not within the classified service by reason of Section 1639-18, General Code (117 Ohio Laws, 525), which authorizes the appointment of necessary employees to serve during the pleasure of the juvenile judge.

The relatrix challenged the power of the General Assembly, by the enactment of Section 1639-18, General Code, to declare exempt a position previously determined by the Civil Service Commission to be in the *26classified civil service. Also the validity of that section was assailed as conflicting with Section 10, Article XV of the Constitution, and the civil service laws of the state.

The Court of Appeals having based its decision upon *Ellis*v. *Urner,*125 Ohio St., 246, 181 N. E., 22, its judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEROMEY G. JONES, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MONTANA STATE PRISON; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-35015 

D.C. No. 6:18-cv-00075-DLC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2021**

Before: GRABER, R. NELSON, and HUNSAKER, Circuit Judges.

Montana state prisoner Jeromey G. Jones appeals pro se from the district 

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to comply with

court orders. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

In his opening brief, Jones fails to address the grounds for dismissal and has 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-35015 

therefore waived his challenge to the district court’s judgment. See Indep. Towers 

of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not 

consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”); 

Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues not supported by 

argument in pro se appellant’s opening brief are waived).

Jones’s motion to appoint counsel (Docket Entry No. 17) is denied.

AFFIRMED.
1 

### Hutson, Nick

From: Hutson, Nick Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 6:16 PM To: Frey, Nathan J. Cc: 'Szabo, Aaron'; Culligan, Kevin; Fruh, Steve Subject: RE: Revised versions of 111(b) preamble/rule Attachments: 111b preamble_DRAFT_0782815_RLSO_compare to 072415. docx

Nathan –

Sorry ... I sent you the 07/24/15 clean version inste ad of the RLSO that I mentioned in my previous emai l.

The correct file is attached. Sorry about that.

Nick



# Nick Hutson, PhD

Energy Strategies Group Office of Air & Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 tel: +1 919 541 2968 email: hutson.nick@epa.gov

From: Hutson, Nick Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 6:00 PM To: Frey, Nathan J. Cc: Szabo, Aaron; Culligan, Kevin; Fruh, Steve Subject: Revised versions of 111(b) preamble/rule

Nathan,

Please find three files attached:

1. A clean version of the latest version of the 111(b) preamble and rule for GHG emissions from new, modi fied, and reconstructed EGUs – this version incorporates chan ges responsive to Interagency comments/suggestions and also changes that we have made as we continue to im prove the document. The document also has EPA responses to OMB/Interagency comments in marginal c omment balloons. 2. A RLSO version showing changes that have been made – compared to the clean version that was submitted to OMB on 07/24/15. 3. EPA’s response to summary of comments from review o f the 07/24/15 submission.

We are continuing to work on the document. However, we expect no more substantive changes to the docum ent.

Specifically we are still working on:

1. We are reading through to ensure consistency in ter minology, formatting, punctuation, grammar, etc.2

2. We are revising some sections (esp. turbine section s) for readability and clarity – however, again, no substantive or directional changes. 3. We are working on the NTTA section and amendments t o 60.17 – this involves making sure we are properly incorporating the test methods (e.g., ASME test met hods for determining efficiency and ANSI method for assuring consistent accuracy of electricity monitor ing) 4. We are reviewing regulatory text to make sure it is as easy as possible for the public to understand & verifying that it is consistent with the preamble.

If you have any questions or concerns, let me know.

Thanks, Nick



# Nick Hutson, PhD

Energy Strategies Group Office of Air & Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 tel: +1 919 541 2968 email: hutson.nick@epa.gov
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

ANCHOR GLASS CONTAINER CORPORATION
STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                            YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,         PERIOD FROM
                                                          --------------------------     FEBRUARY 5, 1997
                                                                                                 TO
                                                            1999              1998       DECEMBER 31, 1997
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                      <C>               <C>          <C>
EARNINGS -

Loss before extraordinary item                           $(17,511)         $ (9,770)         $   (271)

Interest and amortization of debt expense                  28,870            27,098            18,281

Rental expense representative of interest factor            5,088             5,915             5,849
                                                         --------          --------          --------

Total earnings                                           $ 16,447          $ 23,243          $ 23,859

FIXED CHARGES -

Interest and amortization of debt expense                $ 28,870          $ 27,098          $ 18,281

Rental expense representative of interest factor            5,088             5,915             5,849
                                                         --------          --------          --------

Total fixed charges                                      $ 33,958          $ 33,013          $ 24,130
                                                         ========          ========          ========
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
CHARGES                                                        --                --                --
                                                         ========          ========          ========
DEFICIENCY OF EARNINGS AVAILABLE
TO COVER FIXED CHARGES                                   $ 17,511          $  9,770          $    271
                                                         ========          ========          ========
</TABLE>

For the purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges and the
deficiency of earnings available to cover fixed charges, earnings consist of
income (loss) before income taxes, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of
change in accounting, plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest and
amortization of debt expense plus a portion of operating lease expense.