alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32











CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of The Bombay Company, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 28, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
      of
      the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their
      knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

















/S/
      DAVID B.
      STEWART /S/
      ELAINE D. CROWLEY


David
      B.
      Stewart     Elaine
      D. Crowley


Chief
      Executive Officer            Senior
      Vice President, CFO and


Treasurer





Dated:
      December 6,
      2006  Dated:
      December 6, 2006
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hyperdynamics Corporation (Hyperdynamics), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Jason Davis, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Hyperdynamics, does hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to his knowledge:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  Date: November 23, 2009
  By: /s/ Jason Davis
 Ray Leonard
 Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00857-CR

Andrew MENDOZA,

Appellant

v.

The /s

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CR-3452A

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 4, 2015

DISMISSED

On December 16, 2014, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed 

pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the 

right of appeal was made part of the appellate record within thirty days. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 175-76 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, 

order). Appellant did not file an amended certification. The clerk’s record does not contain a 

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial court 

certification in the record states “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has 
04-14-00857-CR

NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment 

assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the 

defendant; therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has no 

right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2 -
#### The State, ex rel. Lippincott, *v.*Metzger et al., Board of Elections of Clinton County, et al.

(No. 28356

Decided September 20, 1940.)

*Mr. Ralph G. Martin,*for relator.

*Mr. G. L. Schilling,*prosecuting attorney, for respondents, Harry A. Metzger and others, board of elections.

*Mr. James N. Linton, Mr. Henry J. Linton*and *308
      *Messrs. Rogers, Smith & Kirie,*for respondent, Hugh J. Wright.

By the Court.

Prior to September 4,1935, probate judges were not required to be admitted to the practice of law, but on that date amended Section 10501-1, General Code (116 Ohio Laws, 481), became effective. It reads as follows:

> ‘ ‘ Quadrennially, in each county having a separate Probate Court, one probate judge shall be elected who shall have been admitted to practice as attorney and counsellor at law in this state, *or who shall have previously served as probate judge immediately prior to his election.*He shall hold his office for a term of four years, commencing on the ninth day of February next following his election.” (Italics ours.)

It is the contention of the relator that the foregoing clause relating to those who have previously served as probate judge is unconstitutional as violating Section 26, Article II of the Ohio Constitution, requiring that “All laws, of a general nature, shall have a uniform operation throughout the state,” and Section 1 of Article XIV, Amendments to the United States Constitution, providing that “No state shall ** * **deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. ”

The qualifications for the office of probate judge not having been prescribed by the Constitution, the General Assembly has power to fix and determine the essential qualifications for the office. Pursuant to that authority the Legislature prescribed two alternative tests of qualification: Training and experience by serving in the office as probate judge immediately prior to the election in question, or admission to the practice as an attorney and counsellor at law. The classification thus made is not unreasonable or arbitrary; the statute is uniform in its operation throughout the state, *309and not violative of any provision of either state or federal Constitution.

The demurrers to the petition will be sustained, and a writ of prohibition denied.

*Writ denied.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
#### CARILLO v. STATE.

No. 22394.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 10, 1943.

Granvil W. Smith, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of being a vagrant, and her punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

From the judgment of conviction she has appealed to this court, contending that the evidence is insufficient to justify and sustain the same. We are inclined to agree with her. The acts charged as constituting her a vagrant are: (1) That she was a person without employment and had no visible means of support; and (2) that she was then a common prostitute.

The proof shows that she roomed at S08 Monterrey Street in the City of San Antonio; that she worked at a beer joint on Buena Vista Street; that she had never been seen soliciting men; that she had never been caught in bed with a man; and the witness could not say that he had ever seen her in a room with a man within the last few months.

This is in substance all the testimony in support of the allegations in the complaint and information. We are at a loss to understand upon what theory the trial court convicted her or declined to grant her a new trial.

Having reached the conclusion that the evidence is wholly insufficient to sustain the conviction, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by .the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<CIK>                                  0000937598
<NAME>                                 PERIPHONICS CORPORATION
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                       10,989
<SECURITIES>                                 11,033
<RECEIVABLES>                                38,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (1,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  13,631
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             75,610
<PP&E>                                       39,512
<DEPRECIATION>                              (20,379)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               95,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        18,062
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        137
<OTHER-SE>                                   76,265
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 95,155
<SALES>                                      33,647
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             33,647
<CGS>                                        16,530
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                16,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             13,514
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               3,763
<INCOME-TAX>                                  1,411
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           2,352
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  2,352
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.17
        


</TABLE>
*The Hon. Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge

for the Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.

_____________

No. 96-1649WM

_____________

Richard D. McMillin, *

*

Appellant, * On Appeal from the United

* States District Court

v. * for the Western District

* of Missouri

* Michael Bowersox, * [To Be Published] * Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: November 18, 1996

 Filed: December 31, 1996 ___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, MAGILL, Circuit Judge, and

LONGSTAFF,* District Judge. ___________

PER CURIAM.

The Court has received a Suggestion of Death in the abovecaptioned appeal. The suggestion reports that Richard McMillin,

appellant, died at the Potosi Correctional Center on December 2,

1996.

McMillin was before our Court appealing the denial of his

petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Since his imprisonment ended

upon his death, and there can be no future collateral consequences
-2-

flowing from his imprisonment, his collateral attack is moot. Lane

v. Williams, 455 U.S. 624 (1982); McMann v. Ross, 396 U.S. 118

(1969).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as moot, the judgment of

the District Court is vacated, and the case is remanded with

instructions to dismiss the petition as moot. See United States v.

Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39-41 (1950).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TODD ASTILLERO,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 32 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TODD ASTILLERO,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 33 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of July, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
**Exhibit 31.02****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Brian R. Day, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Viseon, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     */s/ Brian R. Day*       Brian R. Day    Chief Financial Officer  Date: November 14, 2005
EXHIBIT 23.01

                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT

                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
European Micro Holdings, Inc.

We consent to incorporation  by reference in the registration  statement on Form
S-8 (No. 333-69215) of our report dated August 24, 2000 except as to notes 3, 9,
and 10, which are as of October 5, 2000,  relating to the  consolidated  balance
sheets of European Micro Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2000 and
1999,  and the related  consolidated  statements  of  operations,  shareholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year  period ended June
30, 2000,  which report  appears in the June 30, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K
of European Micro Holdings, Inc.

/s/ KPMG

Nashville, Tennessee
October 9, 2000
Competence Center Analytics 

1st Amendment to Final Report 

Final Report 

Characterization of , EFKA-3600N without DOA" 

Study No. 11 L00371 (confidential) 

Page 1 of 2 

Test item 

Batch identification 

CAS no. 

Testing facility 

Study director 

Reason for the amendment 

,EFKA-3600N without DOA" 

GK3365-099 without DOA 

1334163-54-0 

Competence Center Analytics, BASF SE, 

D-67056 Ludwigshafen 

Mr. Beringer, GKC/C- E210 

The chemical structure is wrongly stated in the final report. 

Location of error in the final report 

Page 1, line ,Chemical structure" 

Corrected version 

0 

l...... CH3 

stk·· .. .. . .. .... . .......... .... ... _}/pv._ ls..f. 2a~;: ........ . (Mr. Beringer) 
Competence Center Analytics 

1st Amendment to Final Report 

Final Report 

Characterization of "EFKA-3600N without DOA" 

Study No. 11L00371 (confidential) 

Statement of the Quality Assurance Unit 

D• BASF 

The Chemical Company 

Page 2 of2 

The Quality Assurance Unit inspects the laboratories of the department Competence Center Analytics in 

regular intervals. Besides these general inspections we inspected the following items of this study in 

accordance with the OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice and the GLP Principles of the German 

"Chemikaliengesetz" (Chemicals Act). Findings are reported to study director and to management. 

Verification of study plan: Sep 12,2011 

Inspection of Date of inspection Reported to 

study director and to 

management 

Conduct of study: 

Molecular mass distribution Sep 14, 2011 Sep21 , 2011 

Headspace GC (n-butyl acrylate, iso-butyl Oct 18, 2011 Oct 20, 2011 

methacrylate and perfluorohexylethyl 

methacrylate) 

Raw data: Nov 08, 2011 Nov 17, 2011 

Final report: Nov 08, 2011 Nov 17,2011 

1st Amendment to final report: Nov 29, 2011 Nov 29, 2011 

The final report reflects the raw data. 

Ludwigshafen 

a;lfM~~er-Schlieker ~~ ____ d(fz_C!__d!_.f, ___ tJ /7' Date
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27566]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-4145]


Wolverine World Wide, Inc., Rockford, MI; Notice of Termination 
of Investigation

    Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment 
assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with 
section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), an investigation was initiated on 
August 21, 1999 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at 
Wolverine World Wide, Incorporated, Rockford, Michigan.
    An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers 
remains in effect (NAFTA-2668), which expires on January 25, 2001. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of October 2000.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-27566 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 214 (Friday, November 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66253-66254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28346]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Wednesday, November 8, 2000.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   
Summary Agenda: Because of its routine nature, no discussion of the 
following item is anticipated. The matter will be voted on without 
discussion unless a member of the Board requests that the item be moved 
to the discussion agenda.
    1. Proposed 2001 Private Sector Adjustment Factor.
Discussion Agenda:
    2. Proposed 2001 fee schedules for priced services.
    3. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

    Note: This meeting will be recorded for the benefit of those 
unable to attend. Cassettes

[[Page 66254]]

will be available for listening in the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office, and copies may be ordered for $6 per cassette by 
calling 202-452-3684 or by writing to: Freedom of Information 
Office, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 
Washington, DC 20551.


CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board, 202-452-3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 for a recorded 
announcement of this meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site 
at http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement. (The 
Web site also includes procedural and other information about the open 
meeting.)

    Dated: November 1, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-28346 Filed 11-1-00; 10:55 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-260-000] 

Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened in this proceeding on Wednesday, November 1 and possibly continuing to November 2, 2000 at 10 a.m., at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, for the purpose of discussing the possible settlement of issues in the proceeding.

Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).

For additional information, contact William J. Collins at (202) 208-0248.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-27768 Filed 10-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M 195