alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4

Case 6:20-cv-00529-ADA Document 1-4 Filed 06/16/20 Page 1 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00529-ADA Document 1-4 Filed 06/16/20 Page 2 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00529-ADA Document 1-4 Filed 06/16/20 Page 3 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00529-ADA Document 1-4 Filed 06/16/20 Page 4 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00529-ADA Document 1-4 Filed 06/16/20 Page 5 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00529-ADA Document 1-4 Filed 06/16/20 Page 6 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00529-ADA Document 1-4 Filed 06/16/20 Page 7 of 8
Case 6:20-cv-00529-ADA Document 1-4 Filed 06/16/20 Page 8 of 8
#### DALTON ENTERPRISES, INC. *v.*BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION

*James M. Miele,*in support of the petition.

*Robert N. Reynolds, Jr.,*in opposition.

Decided May 15, 1998

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 251 (AC 16977), is denied.
U.S. Department of 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Transportation Washington, D.C. 20590

Office of the Secretary

of Transportation

Issue date: August 9, 2013

Mr. Russell E. Pommer

Associate General Counsel and Senior

Director, Regulatory Affairs for

Atlas Air , Inc. Authority expires: August 27, 2013

807 17 th St. NW, Ste. 410

Washington, D.C. 20006

_________________________________ Director, Office of International Aviation

NOTICE OF CONSISTENCY

Atlas Air, Inc.

is a properly certificated carrier that holds authority to conduct charter operations to and from China. Based on

a proposal submitted by the carrier, we have determined that the operations comply with the applicabl e

Department regulations and the provisions of the 201 3

- 201 4 U.S.

- China Protocol.

Number of Flights : Two ( 2 ) one

- way cargo charter s 1

Flight Date(s) : August 17, 2013

- August 25, 2013

Points : Zhengzhou

- Anchorage*

- Chicago

Equipment : Boeing 747F

Th e U.S. carrier operating the above charter flights should report, in writing, to the U.S. Air Carrier Licensing

Division (X

- 44), Office of International Aviation, Department of Transportation, on its operation for the

preceding month by the tenth of each m onth whether the flights operated.

This notice is valid only for the flights contained in the above program.

* Denotes technical stop only.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

www.regulations.gov

1 Following our grant of Atlas Air, Inc.’s request for two ( 2 ) way charter allocation s, 73 one

- wa y charter allocations remain available

in the Zone 2 charter pool for the 201 3 /1 4 charter year.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JUN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                            8134
<SECURITIES>                                      3772
<RECEIVABLES>                                    23969
<ALLOWANCES>                                       679
<INVENTORY>                                      11241<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 48668
<PP&E>                                           53223
<DEPRECIATION>                                   32752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   78274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            20050
<BONDS>                                          14063
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         41538
<OTHER-SE>                                         389
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     78274
<SALES>                                          32576
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 35012
<CGS>                                            18795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    20907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 12622
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    53
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1202
<INCOME-TAX>                                       523
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                679
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       679
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
<FN>
<F1>Inventory detail at August 31, 1996 was finished goods $7685; work in process
$455; raw materials $3101.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3009221-OCT-201008:11 AM
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Hyperdynamics Corporation
      (Hyperdynamics), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Steven M. Plumb,
      Chief Financial Officer of Hyperdynamics, does hereby certify, pursuant to
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to his
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May
      15, 2007





By:
            /s/
                Steven M. PlumbSteven
                M. PlumbChief
                Financial OfficerPrincipal
              Accounting Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
JUDGMENT
No. 04

- 17

- 00220

- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF A .B.R. , W.C.R., and K.R.R

. , Children From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 19862 Honorable Stephani A. Walsh, Judge Presiding
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION , JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE CHAPA In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s July 25, 2017 Nunc Pro Tunc Order in Suit to Modify Parent

- Child Relationship is REVERSED. We RENDER judgment denying appellant Carlos R.’s petition to modify, denying Victoria R.’s cross

- petition to modify, and dismissing Victoria R.’s request to have Carlos post a cash bond. The case is REMANDED to the trial court for the sole issue of determining the parties’ claims for attorney’s fees. It is further ORDERED that the costs of this appeal are taxed against the party incurring the same. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.4.
SIGNED August 22, 2018.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In
connection with the Annual Report of CLP Holdings Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew
Brandler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 20, 2006



By:

/s/ Andrew BrandlerAndrew Brandler Chief Executive Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Pursuant to 5TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 28, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40584 Conference Calendar

JOHNNIE R. PROPES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus COLLIN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY; PLANO POLICE DEPARTMENT; HONORABLE JOHN ROACH, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CV-65

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Johnnie R. Propes, Texas state prisoner # 1178904, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his pro se, in forma pauperis, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. With the benefit of liberal construction, Propes alleged that he was falsely arrested for aggravated assault and that the use of that charge, along with a 1971 conviction, to enhance his sentence for a 2003 murder conviction constituted malicious prosecution. He also allegedNo. 05-40584 -2- that the Collin County prosecutor used his prior offenses to enhance his sentence because he was a black activist. We review a dismissal as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for an abuse of discretion. Taylor v. Johnson , 257 F.3d 470, 472 (5th Cir. 2001). We review a dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted de novo. Hart v. Hairston , 343 F.3d 762, 763-64 (5th Cir. 2003); § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Propes’s allegations, if proven, would implicate the validity of his murder conviction. The claims thus are not cognizable under § 1983. See Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 486 (1994). Propes’s appeal is frivolous and therefore is dismissed. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. In Propes v. Dretke , No. 04-50822 (5th Cir. Apr. 20, 2005), we imposed the 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) bar against Propes. We warn Propes that further filing of frivolous complaints or pleadings may result in additional sanctions against him. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          45,165
<SECURITIES>                                    49,546
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,185
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               116,558
<PP&E>                                          10,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,404
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,738
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,624
<SALES>                                         16,064
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,301
<CGS>                                              935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,715
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  13
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,361
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,576
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,785
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
#### Jose Azirez RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27099.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 27, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

W'esley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin,' for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, three days in jail and a . fine of $200.

No statement - of ' facts ac- . companiés the record. - The sole bill .of exception recites that the cou'rt efred in refusing to grant a new trial and erred in accepting the appellant’s plea of guilty without using an interpreter. The trial court qualified the bill by certifying that no motion for new trial'was filed and that upon the entry of -the plea of guilty he inquired of the defendant if he understood the nature of the charge against him and, upon being assured by the defendant” that he did, the court further required the defendant to explain to him the nature of the offense to which he had plead guilty, which appellant did clearly.

As qualified, the 'bill of exception reflects no error.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.1**

** **

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

** **

The General PartnerEssex Portfolio, L.P.:

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3(Nos. 333-102552, 333-44467, and 333-108336) and the registrationstatement on Form S-8 (No. 333-123001,) of Essex Portfolio, L.P. of our reportsdated March 31, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofEssex Portfolio, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners’ capital andcash flows of Essex Portfolio, L.P. and subsidiaries for each of the years inthe three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financialstatement schedule III, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2004 which reports appear in the December 31, 2004, annual report on Form10-K of Essex Portfolio, L.P. Our report on the consolidated financialstatements and related financial statement schedule III refers to EssexPortfolio L.P.’s implementation of SFAS No. 123 and FIN 46R effective January 1,2004, using the retroactive restatement method for all periods presented.

 

 
|   | /S/ KPMG LLP |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|
|   | KPMG LLP     |

 

 

San Francisco, CaliforniaMarch 31, 2005

 

----
NUMBER 13-09-00609-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellant,

v.

IRIS PERALES, Appellee. 

_____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 197th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Texas Department of Public Safety, perfected an appeal of an order of

expunction entered by the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause

number 2009-07-4278-C. Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds

that the appellant no longer wishes to appeal this case. Appellant requests that this Court

dismiss the appeal.
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of

the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal

at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will

issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed

the 14th day of January, 2010.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                     RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of HyperDynamics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB  for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kent P. Watts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 11, 2004                             By:  /s/ Kent P. Watts
                                                         -----------------
                                                         Kent P. Watts
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41000 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RUBEN PEREZ-BELTRAN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-97-CR-116-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Ruben Perez-Beltran has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03746**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  03746\03746_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03746\03746_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03746\03746_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03746\03746_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03746\03746_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03746\03746_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03746\03746_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03746\03746_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03746\03746_PlantID_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03746\Certification Statement Plant ID 03746.pdf Plant certification statement x 03746\Supplemental Documentation\NH Harbor Drawings\Effluent Limitations Guideline ICR - Line Drawing.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03746\Supplemental Documentation\NH Harbor Drawings\New Haven Site Plan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of European Micro Holdings, Inc. (the
“ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date: October 12, 2006
            By:
            */s/
                Jay P. Nash*Name:
            Jay
              P. NashTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to European Micro Holdings, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by European Micro Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.