alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's financial statements incorporated by reference in the accompanying
Annual Report on Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-29-2000
<CASH>                                               3,336
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         57,293
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    65,016
<PP&E>                                              29,013
<DEPRECIATION>                                       7,967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      89,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               29,433
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               190
<OTHER-SE>                                          49,844
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        89,674
<SALES>                                            276,843
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   276,843
<CGS>                                              187,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      187,423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    91,446
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (3,133)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (3,133)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (3,133)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.17)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                              58
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                       168
<INVENTORY>                                        822
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,021
<PP&E>                                           1,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,452
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,877
<COMMON>                                           104
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,153
<SALES>                                          2,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,489
<CGS>                                            1,922
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (101)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,702)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,702)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,702)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 25, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00487

- CV

Mary Alice SAIZ

, Appellant

v.

SUSSER HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND STRIPES LLC, Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Tri al Court No. 2012

- 02

- 28,530

- CV The Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant Mary Alice Saiz attempts to appeal from an order confirming an arbitration award and dismissing her claims with prejudice. The challenged order , which appears to be a final judgment , was signed on February 24, 2014

. The clerk ’s record contains a motion for new trial and a notice of appeal.

Under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 329b(a), the moti on for new trial was due on March 26, 2014

. T he clerk’ s record, however, shows that appellant filed a motion f or new trial o n April 10, 2014 , which wa s more than thirty days after the judgment was signed

. Absent a timely filed

motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due within thirty days from the date the judgment was signed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1. B ecause appellant did not file her notice of appeal until May 23, 2014, the notice of appeal wa s untimely.

Our jurisdiction is invoked by t he timely filing of a notice of appeal. See T E X

. R. A PP

. P. 25.1(b); Garza v. Hibernia Nat’l Bank , 227 S.W.3d 233, 233 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1 st Dist.] 2007, no pet.). Thus, w ithout a timely notice of appeal, this court has no jurisdiction over this appeal.

We, therefore, order appellant to show cause in writing by August 11

, 2014

, why this appeal should not be di smissed for lack of jurisdiction. We suspend all appellate deadlines pending our determination of whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of July, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of C ourt
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------


     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         In connection with the filing of the financial statements of Jinpan
         International Limited ("Registrant") for the fiscal year ended December
         31, 2002 (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to
         such officer's knowledge, that:


          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of Registrant.


                                     /s/ Li Zhiyuan
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Li Zhiyuan
                                     Chief Executive Officer


                                     /s/ Mark Du
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Mark Du
                                     Principal Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7177

JAMES EARL BENDER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-01-887-2)

Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 19, 2002

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Earl Bender, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James Earl Bender appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed

the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that

Bender has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right. See Bender v. Angelone, No. CA-01-887-2 (E.D.

Va. July 24, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)

(2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 210 (Monday, October 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27847]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

    The United States Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board 
announces that it will convene a Public Meeting beginning at 9:30 a.m. 
local time on November 8, 2000, at 2175 K Street, Second floor 
(Conference rooms of the Medical Society of the District of Columbia) 
Washington, DC.
    Topics will include:

    1. Presentation of recommendations for the CSB investigation into 
the March 4, 1998, incident at a Sonat Incorporated crude oil and 
natural gas production and separation facility near Pitkin, Louisiana.
    2. Update on the recommendations resulting from the Board 
investigation into an incident at the Morton International, Inc. Plant 
in Paterson, New Jersey on April 8, 1998.
    3. Update on the CSB investigation into the February 23, 1999, fire 
that occurred at the fractionator tower in the 50 crude oil processing 
unit at the Tosco ``Avon'' refinery in Martinez, California.
    4. Update on review of open investigation files (Independent 
Fireworks, Sonat II, Equilon, Concept Sciences, and Condea Vista).
    5. Update on the CSB Hiring Plan Initiative.
    6. Board Initiatives with other Federal agencies;
    7. Discussion of Board documents (Sonat Investigation Report, CSB 
five-year Strategic Plan, Memoranda of Understanding with the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, and GAO Report--Coordination 
between various Federal Agencies).
    8. CSB budget for FY 2001.
    9. CSB Notation memorandums.
    10. Update on Board Member activities.
    11. Tentative date for next Board meeting.

    The meeting will be open to the public. For more information, 
please contact the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board's 
Office of External Relations, (202) 261-7600, or visit our website at: 
www.csb.gov.

Christopher W. Warner,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-27847 Filed 10-25-00; 4:28 pm]
BILLING CODE 6350-01-U
# EPA Plans for D4



# Risk Assessment
December 6, 2012 Ward Penberthy

# EPA Plans for D4 Risk Asse 

# ssment

• As part of EPA’s comprehensive approach to enhance the Agency’s existing chemical management program, in March 2012, EPA identified a work plan of 83 chemicals for further assessment under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).
• The process EPA adopted emphasized focusing on chemicals that meet one or more of the following factors:

– Potentially of concern to children’s health (for example, concern for reproductive or developmental effects)

– Neurotoxic effects

– Probable or known carcinogens

– Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic (PBT)

– Used in consumer and children’s products

– Detected in biomonitoring programs
• EPA initially identified 7 of the 83 work plan chemicals for risk assessment in 2012.
• On June 1, 2012, EPA identified an additional 18 chemicals for assessment during 2013 and 2014. D4 is one of these chemicals

# Criteria which led to D4 inclusion in

the Workplan

• High production volume (100 - 500 million lb/yr)

• Highly persistent in sediment
• High bioaccumulation potential
• Potential reproductive toxicity
• Aquatic toxicity
• Use in consumer products (soaps and detergents, adhesives and sealants, polishes and sanitation products)
• Present in biomonitoring (blood, breast milk and aquatic species)
• Also found in indoor environments, sediments and surface water

• ECA activity
• Scheduled to begin IRIS process in 2013

# Siloxane ECA Relevance to Planned Workplan Risk Assessment

– Would provide valuable environmental monitoring data which could substantially contribute to an exposure assessment that would be used in the D4 risk assessment

– Would reduce uncertainty in the planned risk assessment

– EPA believes SEHSC’s monitoring proposal of 4 direct discharge sites and 5 POTWs would be insufficient to develop an informed national exposure assessment. Pursuing such a limited monitoring strategy could result in anecdotal data which would likely not reduce the uncertainty associated with understanding the concentrations of D4 in environmental media and biota. If pursued, the limited monitoring data collected under the SEHSC proposal may be an inefficient use of EPA’s and industry’s resources. EPA believes its current proposal would provide a much higher quality data set.

# EPA’s Likely Approach to Exposure 

# Assessment in the Absence of Monitoring Data Sought by the ECA

• EPA would consider available information, including:

– Existing limited monitoring and release data

– Release estimating methods often used in the EPA’s New Chemicals Program

– Conservative models that estimate environmental concentrations resulting from releases

– Conservative models that estimate bioaccumulation and bio magnification in aquatic organisms

– Information submitted under the Dow P roduct Stewardship Agreement

– Previously prepared generic Conceptual Site Models and Mass Balance Report

– Assessment efforts of other countries (UK, Canada)
• EPA may supplement available information with additional data gathering initiatives.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL
REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          72,891
<SECURITIES>                                    74,822
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,222
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,430
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               183,905
<PP&E>                                          21,749
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 195,949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,311
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     160,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   195,949
<SALES>                                         41,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,212
<CGS>                                            1,978
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,746
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  68
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,198
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,031
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,167
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Incara
Pharmaceuticals Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard W. Reichow, Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/    RICHARD W. REICHOWRichard W. Reichow Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer February13, 2003


|
|
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 211 (Tuesday, October 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64951-64952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27908]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Office of Communications; Cancellation of a Optional Form

AGENCY: General Services Administration DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense cancelled the following Optional 
Form because of low usage:


[[Page 64952]]


OF 87A, Attention--Electrostatic Sensitive Devices (Label)

DATES: Effective October 31, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Barbara Williams, General Services 
Administration, (202) 501-0581.

    Dated: October 10, 2000.
Barbara M. Williams,
Deputy Standard and Optional Forms Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-27908 Filed 10-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-157-AD

Costs:

Labor per airplane (1 work hour(s) x $85/hour) $ 85

Parts per airplane $ + 0

Cost per airplane $ 85

Number of U.S.-registered airplanes 

x

 745

Total fleet cost $63,325

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
March 26 , 2013

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting N otes for the March 5 , 201 3 Conference Call with Airtek

FROM: Kelley Spence (EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD/NRG)

TO: Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2012

- 0640

This memorandum summarizes the conference call between Airtek and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) on March 5 , 2013 . The purpose of the meeting was to discuss electrostatic precipitator ( ESP ) operation and parametric monitoring.

Meeting Attendees:

John Roberts

– Airtek
Al Johnson

– Airtek

John Bradfield

– EPA/SPPD Kelley Spence

– EPA/SPPD

Discussion Points:

Electrostatic precipitator operatio n and parametric monitoring were discussed. Monitoring parameters such as power and opacity were discussed. It was noted that opacity is the better measure of ESP efficiency and that reduced power doesn’t always correlate with more emissions. Representatives noted
th at a good correlation between PM concentration and opacity exists for each unit. It was also noted that it is important to look at total power when monitoring electrical conditions (current and power), instead of using the parameters as stand

- alone assess ments of unit operation.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 1, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65271-65272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27990]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-2331; MM Docket No. 00-112; RM-9901]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Weiser, ID; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Correcting amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the final regulations, 
which were published in the Federal Register on September 20, 2000 
(65FR56799). The regulations related to

[[Page 65272]]

the information concerning Radio Broadcasting Services in Weiser, ID. 
This document contains a correction to that rule.

DATES: Effective on November 1, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document corrects Section 73.202(b), 
the Table of FM Allotment under Oregon to remove Weiser, Channel 280C1 
and by adding Weiser, Channel 280C1 under Idaho. FR Doc. 00-24069, 
published on September 20, 2000 (65FR56799), inadvertently added 
Weiser, Channel 280C1 to Oregon instead of Idaho.

List of Subjects 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Accordingly, 47 CFR part 73 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendments:

PART 73--[RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Oregon, is 
amended by removing Weiser, Channel 280C1.

    3. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Idaho, is 
amended by adding Weiser, Channel 280C1.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-27990 Filed 10-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P