alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 25 (Monday, February 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2711]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Maritime Administration

[Docket No. MARAD-2000-6853]


Information Collection Available for Public Comments and 
Recommendations

ACTION:  Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Maritime Administration's (MARAD's) intentions to 
request extension of approval for three years of a currently approved 
information collection.

DATES:  Comments should be submitted on or before April 7, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Richard Walker, Maritime 
Administration, MAR 810, 400 Seventh St., SW, Room 7209, Washington, DC 
20590. Telephone: 202-366-8888, or FAX 202-366-6988.
    Copies of this collection can also be obtained from that office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title of Collection: Inventory of American Intermodal Equipment.
    Type of Request: Extension of currently approved information 
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2133-0503.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Expiration Date of Approval: September 30, 2000.
    Summary of Collection of Information: The collection consists of an 
intermodal equipment inventory that provides data essential to both the 
government and the transportation industry in planning for the most 
efficient use of intermodal equipment.
    Need and Use of the Information: The information contained in the 
inventory provides data about U.S.-based companies that own or lease 
intermodal equipment and is essential to both government and industry 
in planning for contingency operations.
    Description of Respondents: The report requests information from 
U.S. steamship and intermodal equipment leasing companies.
    Annual Responses: 22.
    Annual Burden: 66 hours.
    Comments: Comments should refer to the docket number that appears 
at the top of this document. Written comments may be submitted to the 
Docket Clerk, U.S. DOT Dockets, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW, 
Washington, DC 20590. Comments may also be submitted by electronic 
means via the Internet at http://dmses.dot.gov/submit. Specifically 
address whether this information collection is necessary for proper 
performance of the function of the agency and will have practical 
utility; accuracy of the burden estimates, ways to minimize this 
burden, and ways to enhance quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected. All comments received will be available 
for examination at the above address between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. EDT, 
Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. An electronic version 
of this document is available on the World Wide Web at http://dms.dot.gov.

    Dated: February 2, 2000.

    By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Joel C. Richard,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-2711 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                     RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of HyperDynamics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kent P.
Watts, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 16, 2005                         By: /s/ Kent P. Watts
                                               -----------------
                                               Kent P. Watts
                                               Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,211,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  286,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,730,343
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,372,048
<PP&E>                                         485,368
<DEPRECIATION>                                 215,583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,914,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,194,052
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,523
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,672,572
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,914,157
<SALES>                                        433,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               433,876
<CGS>                                          473,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  473,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,181,629
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (7,963)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,219,017)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,219,017)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,219,017)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.37)
        

</TABLE>
L.':.r I b: ;;s?ORTAI!ON 

INTERNATIONA L TRAVE L 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation l^roceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airiines, I am writing in support of American's application to 

provide new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport and Los Angeles International 

Airport to Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last December In reaching a 

landmark Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up Haneda to service by U.S. airiines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New York and Los 

Angeles to Haneda In order to provide an essential connection between three of the world's largest 

financial and commerce centers. 

Recent events. Including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance membership, 

have underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific market. American is likewise 

committed to New York and Los Angeles - both vital focal points of business, trade, entertainment, 

technology and education - providing unsurpassed air service since the mid-1900s 

Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic benefits from these 

proposed new flights, as will American's customers and employees. However, we need your help to 

make the JFK & LAX/Haneda connection a reality. 

Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airiines and its request for slots to fly from Kennedy 

and Los Angeles to Haneda! ^ 

Sincerely, 

5anne Esplin 

AUSTIN • BALTIMORE • CHICAGO • DALLAS • DENVER • FORT COLLINS • HOUSTON 

LAS VEGAS • NEW YORK • SAN FRANCISCO • SEATTLE • WASHINGTON DC 

3340 Dundee Road • Suite 2N1 • Northbrook, IL 60062 

Phone: 847-564-8240 • Fax: 847-564-4798 • Toll Free: 800-229-8240 • www.frosch.com
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WARREN ERIC ARMSTEAD,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

RICHARD IVES, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 11-57047

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-06189-CAS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2012*** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Warren Eric Armstead appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the denial of a section 2241

FILED

DEC 31 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-57047

petition de novo and the district court’s factual findings for clear error. See

Reynolds v. Thomas, 603 F.3d 1144, 1148 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.

Armstead contends that his due process rights were violated in the prison

disciplinary proceedings finding him guilty of failing to provide a urine sample. 

The record does not support his contention. Because Armstead received all the

process that was due and some evidence supports the disciplinary findings, he is

not entitled to relief. See Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 455 (1985); Wolff

v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-67 (1974).

Armstead also alleges that prison officials violated his First, Fourth, Eighth

and Fourteenth Amendment rights in connection with the urine sample requested. 

The appropriate remedy for these claims lies in a civil rights action under Bivens v.

Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), rather than a section 2241

petition. See Tucker v. Carlson, 925 F.2d 330, 332 (9th Cir. 1991); see also

Hernandez v. Campbell, 204 F.3d 861, 864 (9th Cir. 2000) (section 2241 petitions

“challenge the manner, location, or conditions of a sentence’s execution”).

We decline to consider Armstead’s argument, raised for the first time on

appeal, challenging the prison’s policies regarding urine samples. See Padgett v.

Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3193 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to strengthen 

the review authority of the Financial Stability Oversight Council of 

regulations issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2013 

Mr. DUFFY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 

to strengthen the review authority of the Financial Stability Oversight Council of regulations issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consumer Financial 

5 Protection Safety and Soundness Improvement Act of 

6 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3193 IH

1 SEC. 2. COUNCIL VOTING PROCEDURE. 

2 Section 1023(c)(3)(A) of the Consumer Financial 

3 Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5513(c)(3)(A)) is 

4 amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘2 5 ⁄3’’ and inserting ‘‘a major6 ity’’; and 

7 (2) by inserting before the period the following: 

8 ‘‘, excluding the Director of the Bureau’’. 

9 SEC. 3. REVIEW AUTHORITY OF THE COUNCIL. 

10 Section 1023 of the Consumer Financial Protection 

11 Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5513) is amended— 

12 (1) in subsection (a)— 

13 (A) by striking ‘‘may’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘shall’’; and 

15 (B) by striking ‘‘regulation or provision 

16 would put the safety and soundness of the 

17 United States banking system or the stability of 

18 the financial system of the United States at 

19 risk’’ and inserting ‘‘regulation which is the 

20 subject of the petition is inconsistent with the 

21 safe and sound operations of United States fi22 nancial institutions’’; and 

23 (2) in subsection (c)— 

24 (A) in paragraph (3)(B)(ii), by striking 

25 ‘‘would put the safety and soundness of the 

26 United States banking system or the stability of 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3193 IH

1 the financial system of the United States at 

2 risk’’ and inserting ‘‘is inconsistent with the 

3 safe and sound operations of United States fi4 nancial institutions’’; 

5 (B) in paragraph (4)— 

6 (i) by striking subparagraph (B); and 

7 (ii) by redesignating subparagraph 

8 (C) as subparagraph (B); 

9 (C) by striking paragraph (5); and 

10 (D) by redesignating paragraphs (6), (7), 

11 and (8) as paragraphs (5), (6), and (7), respec12 tively. 

13 SEC. 4. SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS CHECK. 

14 Section 1022(b)(2)(A) of the Consumer Financial 

15 Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5512(b)(2)(A)) is 

16 amended— 

17 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

18 (2) in clause (ii), by adding ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

19 and 

20 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(iii) the impact of such rule on the 

22 financial safety or soundness of an insured 

23 depository institution;’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Ex parte HATHORN.

No. 23273.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 31, 1945.

C. D. Bourne, Jr., of Dumas, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

This proceeding was instituted in the District Court for the purpose of having the court fix bail for appellant pending his trial on a charge of rape. The court refused ¡to grant bail and the case comes to this court on appeal with statement of the facts introduced at the hearing.

*1022The alleged victim was the thirteen year old daughter of appellant. According to the testimony of the prosecutrix, her mother was present in the room and either consented or but mildly objected to the conduct of the accused. It will not be necessary 'to review the facts. When arre'sted, appellant signed a statement admitting the charges made, together with numerous other acts than that alleged. Upon a hearing in this proceeding he denied them in toto, and detailed the story of their married life which, he said, had led him to the conclusion that he would take whatever “rap” his wife and the daughter wanted to give him.

That a jury would give the evidence by the prosecutrix, or that of the accused, full faith and credit is inconceivable. The facts are too revolting and unnatural. The State’s Attorney concludes hiis brief with the following statement: “We are inclined to seriously question the sufficiency of the proof to lead one to a well-guarded, dispassionate conclusion that the accused is guilty of the offense charged, and that, in all probability, he will be punished capitally therefor.” We concur in that view.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the relator iis ordered discharged upon execution bond in the amount of Five Thousand Dollars.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the annual
period ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 By:
Name:
    
    /s/ Robert W. Zack

Robert W. ZackTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    March 23, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3396 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3396

      To provide for the issuance of a Veterans Health Care Stamp.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2013

Mr. Burgess (for himself, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. Michaud, Ms. McCollum, 
   Mr. Grijalva, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Latta, Mr. Whitfield, Mr. 
  Wittman, Mrs. Bustos, and Mr. Honda) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, 
and in addition to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to 
      be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To provide for the issuance of a Veterans Health Care Stamp.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Health Care Stamp Act''.

SEC. 2. VETERANS HEALTH CARE STAMP.

    (a) In General.--In order to afford a convenient way for members of 
the public to contribute to funding for the medical care and treatment 
of veterans, the United States Postal Service shall provide for the 
issuance and sale of a special postage stamp which shall be known as 
the ``Veterans Health Care Stamp''.
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--The issuance and sale of the Veterans 
Health Care Stamp shall be governed by section 416 of title 39, United 
States Code (as last in effect, if expired), except that--
            (1) all amounts becoming available from the sale of the 
        stamp shall be transferred to the Department of Veterans 
        Affairs in accordance with section 416(d) of such title; and
            (2) the stamp--
                    (A) shall be issued in time for Veterans Day of 
                each year;
                    (B) shall bear such illustration, depiction, 
                design, or other image as the United States Postal 
                Service shall determine; and
                    (C) shall not be subject to any numerical 
                limitation under section 416(e)(1)(C) of such title.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul K. Laikind, Chief Executive Officer of Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:



Date: March 17, 2008

By:

/s/PAUL K. LAIKINDPaul K. Laikind, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer and President


I,
John W. Beck, Chief Financial Officer of Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to my knowledge:



Date: March 17, 2008

By:

/s/JOHN W. BECKJohn W. Beck, C.P.A., Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of these certifications has been provided to Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc. and will be retained by Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

These
certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this quarterly report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc., whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 12
 ADVANTA CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Three Months Ended
    
    
    Six Months EndedJune 30,
    
    
    June 30,($ in thousands)
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005Income from continuing operations
    
    $
    23,040
    
    
    $
    14,382
    
    
    $
    44,950
    
    
    $
    87,052Income tax expense
    
    
    14,423
    
    
    
    9,195
    
    
    
    28,139
    
    
    
    21,542Earnings before income taxes(1)
    
    
    37,463
    
    
    
    23,577
    
    
    
    73,089
    
    
    
    108,594Fixed charges:Interest on debt, deposits and other
borrowings
    
    
    15,189
    
    
    
    11,428
    
    
    
    28,855
    
    
    
    21,724Interest on subordinated debt payable
to preferred securities trust
    
    
    2,290
    
    
    
    2,290
    
    
    
    4,579
    
    
    
    4,579One-third of all rentals
    
    
    457
    
    
    
    415
    
    
    
    904
    
    
    
    801Total fixed charges
    
    
    17,936
    
    
    
    14,133
    
    
    
    34,338
    
    
    
    27,104Earnings before income taxes and fixed charges
    
    $
    55,399
    
    
    $
    37,710
    
    
    $
    107,427
    
    
    $
    135,698Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(2)
    
    
    3.09x
    
    
    
    2.67x
    
    
    
    3.13x
    
    
    
    5.01x
 
 (1)
    
    Earnings before income taxes in the six months ended June 30, 2005 includes a $67.7
million gain on transfer of consumer credit card business relating to our May 28, 2004
agreement with Bank of America Corp.(2)
    
    For purposes of computing these ratios, earnings represent income before income
taxes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense and one-third
(the portion deemed representative of the interest factor) of rental expense on
operating leases.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ALBERTO JOSE )

GONALEZ-VELAZQUEZ, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1044

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 27, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Laura E. Ward, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public 

Defender, and Timothy J. Ferreri, 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for 

Appellant. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code)**

 

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officerof *SOURCECORP*, Incorporated, aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2004 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  May 10, 2004 |    /s/ Ed H.  Bowman, Jr. |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                      | Ed H. Bowman, Jr.                        |
|                      | President and Chief  Executive Officer   |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode).

 

----