alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000937252
<NAME>                        CAREADVANTAGE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        1,471,000
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1,684,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              3,463,000
<PP&E>                                          716,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                5,495,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         3,031,000
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         83,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    2,381,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  5,495,000
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              4,550,000
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 4,295,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (14,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 269,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    238,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    238,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0


</TABLE>
Opinion issued October 4 , 201 2

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 12 - 00 683 - CV

——————————— REGINALD PETTEWAY , Appellant

V. MEMBERSOURCE CREDIT UNION , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 & Probate Court

Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Ca u se No. CI046593

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Reginald Petteway , ha s neither paid the required filing fee for this appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must
pay

— at the time an item is presented for filing

— whatever fees are required by2

statute or Supreme Court order.” ), 20.1 (li sting requirements for establishing indigence); see also T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supr eme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 ( Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in T EX
. R. A PP
. P . app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). Appellant was notified on July 31 , 2012 that he must pay the fee by August 10 , 2012, or the appeal would be subject to dismissal

. After being so notified , appellant requested an extension of time to pay the fee to August 31, 2012, which was granted

. After being granted an extension of ti me to pay the fee, appellant did not pay the fee. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). We dismiss the appeal for failure to pay the filing fee

. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. P ER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Brown

.
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Korben et al., Appellees.

(No. 28075

Decided October 2, 1940.)

*Mr. Frank T. Gullitan,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Neil W. McGill,*for appellant.

*Mr. Harry F. Glick,*for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
#### Smith, Appellant, *v.*Lau, d. b. a. Marion Brass & Bronze Foundry, Appellee. 

(No. 28142

Decided May 15, 1940.)

*Mr. Paul D. Smith*and *Mr. Thomas H. Sutherland,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Guthery & Guthery,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 297 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize support for graduate medical education programs in children’s hospitals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 297 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Children’s Hospital 

3 GME Support Reauthorization Act of 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROGRAM OF PAYMENTS TO CHILDREN’S HOS5 PITALS THAT OPERATE GRADUATE MEDICAL 

6 EDUCATION PROGRAMS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 340E of the Public 

8 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 256e) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘through 2005 

10 and each of fiscal years 2007 through 2011’’ and in11 serting ‘‘through 2005, each of fiscal years 2007 

12 through 2011, and each of fiscal years 2013 through 

13 2017’’; 

14 (2) in subsection (f)(1)(A)(iv), by inserting 

15 ‘‘and each of fiscal years 2013 through 2017’’ after 

16 ‘‘2011’’; and 

17 (3) in subsection (f)(2)(D), by inserting ‘‘and 

18 each of fiscal years 2013 through 2017’’ after 

19 ‘‘2011’’. 

20 (b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Section 340E(b)(3)(D) 

21 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

22 256e(b)(3)(D)) is amended by striking ‘‘Not later than the 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 297 RFS

1 end of fiscal year 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘Not later than 

2 the end of fiscal year 2016’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 4, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32(b)

              SECTION 1350 Certification (Chief Financial Officer)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Financial  Corporation,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I Jerry L. Rexroad, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the Report.

This Certification is provided as of May 10, 2005.


                                             /s/ Jerry L. Rexroad
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Jerry L. Rexroad
                                             Executive Vice President and
                                             Chief Financial Officer


                                       36
<PAGE>

                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS                     Exhibit 23.1


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-52814) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Plan (as amended and restated
October 26, 2000) and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Catalytica Energy
Systems, Inc. of our report dated February 14, 2001, with respect to the
financial statements of Catalytica Energy Systems, Inc included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
March 13, 2001
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION THREE

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent,

v.

DELBERT LEON NICHOLS,

Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 36639-1-III

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

PENNELL, A.C.J. — Delbert Nichols appeals his convictions for felony harassment 

and violation of an anti-harassment order. His court-appointed appellate counsel has filed 

a motion to withdraw on grounds there is no good faith argument for review.

Pursuant to State v. Theobald, 78 Wn.2d 184, 470 P.2d 188 (1970), and Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), a motion to withdraw 

must:

[1] be accompanied by a brief referring to anything in the record that might 

arguably support the appeal. [2] A copy of counsel’s brief should be 

furnished the indigent and [3] time allowed him to raise any points he 

chooses; [4] the court—not counsel—then proceeds, after a full 

examination of all the proceedings, to decide whether the case is wholly 

frivolous.

Theobald, 78 Wn.2d at 185 (alterations in original) (quoting Anders, 386 U.S. at 744).

FILED

AUGUST 20, 2019

In the Office of the Clerk of Court

WA State Court of Appeals, Division III
No. 36639-1-III 

State v. Nichols 

Mr. Nichols's attorney has complied with this procedure. Mr. Nichols has not 

filed a statement of additional grounds for review. After independently reviewing the 

issues identified in counsel's Anders brief and the State's responsive briefing, we agree 

that none of the recited issues merits relief on appeal. 1 

Because the issues identified by counsel are wholly frivolous, the motion to 

withdraw is granted, subject to compliance with RAP l 8.3(a)( 4). The appeal is 

dismissed. 

A majority of the panel has determined this opinion will not be printed in the 

Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for public record pursuant to 

RCW 2.06.040. 

Q_ 

Pennell, A.CJ. 

WE CONCUR: 

1 Counsel has identified the issues of ( 1) evidentiary sufficiency, (2) double 

jeopardy, (3) hardship excusal of jurors, ( 4) ineffective assistance of counsel, and 

( 5) off ender score calculation as the issues most likely to have merit. 

2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65730-65731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27945]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 98-ANE-61-AD; Amendment 39-11941; AD 2000-21-09]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney PW2000 Series Turbofan 
Engines, Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document makes a correction to Airworthiness Directive 
(AD) 2000-21-09 applicable to Pratt & Whitney PW 2000 series turbofan 
engines that was published in the Federal Register on October 24, 2000 
(65 FR 63542). The statements identifying AD 2000-21-09 as superseding 
AD 99-08-14, Amendment 39-11120 (64 FR 17949, dated April 13, 1999), 
were inadvertantly omitted from the Summary section, Supplementary 
Information section, and the AD heading. This document corrects those 
statements. In all other respects, the original document remains the 
same.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 22, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Yang, Aerospace Engineer, Engine 
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New 
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone 781-238-
7747; fax 781-238-7199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A final rule airworthiness directive (FR 
Doc. 00-27166) applicable to Pratt & Whitney PW2000 series turbofan 
engines, was published in the Federal Register on October 24, 2000 (65 
FR 63542). The following corrections are needed:

    1. On page 63542, in the first column, in the Summary section, in 
the first and second lines, ``This amendment adopts a new airworthiness 
directive'' is corrected to read ``This amendment supersedes an 
existing airworthiness directive''.

    2. On page 63542, in the first column, in the SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION section, in the first paragraph, in the

[[Page 65731]]

third and fourth lines, ``(14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
directive (AD)'' is corrected to read ``(14 CFR part 39) by superseding 
(AD) 99-08-14, Amendment 39-11120 (64 FR 17949), dated April 13, 
1999''.


Sec. 39.13  [Corrected]

    3. On page 63543, in the second column, in the AD heading, in the 
second line, ``39-11941. Docket No. 98-ANE-61-AD.'' is corrected to 
read ``39-11941 Docket No. 98-ANE-61-AD. Supersedes AD 99-08-14, 
Amendment 39-11120.''.

    Issued in Burlington, MA, on October 25, 2000.
David A. Downey,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 00-27945 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

KELLY NIKIA GALLOWAY, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D23-6

LT Case No. 16-2018-CF-001363-AXXX

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

 Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed June 30, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Duval County, 

Mark Borello, Judge. 

Melissa Joy Ford, of Office of 

Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional 

Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

LAMBERT, C.J., WALLIS and PRATT, JJ., concur.
#### St. Clair CARRINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 21964.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 10, 1941.

Oliver W. Johnson, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant’s application to withdraw his appeal is found to be in due form and is, accordingly, granted.
EXHIBIT 12.1
                         RECKSON SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC
                       RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

         The  following  table sets forth the Company's  consolidated  ratios of
earnings to fixed charges for the periods shown:


          For the year ended                    July 15, 1997 to
           December 31, 1998                    December 31, 1997
           -----------------                    -----------------
           $6,251,423(1)                         $225,293 (2)

----------------
(1)   The excess of losses over fixed charges amounted to $6,251,423
(2)   The excess of losses over fixed charges amounted to $225,293.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) ) Case No. FAA 2015720020 ) (Civil Penalty Action) ) FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION ) Respondent. ) FDMS no. Not Assigned ) Judge NotAssigned

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

# RECEIVED SEP 212015 

## HEARING DOCKET

Please enter the appearance ofGreg Stofko as attorney ofrecordfor Respondent inthe above referenced action. Service ofall papers byU.S. Mail, expedited courier service, and personal delivery should be addressed as follows: Greg Stofko FedExExpress, Regulatory Affairs 1700 PennsylvaniaAve., NW Suite 950 Washington, DC 20006 Datedthis 18th day ofSeptember, 2015.

By:.~-:::_--cr'e---,L--:-::--:::____c_,L,L / re

orncy for Re ondent 1700 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Suite 950 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 393-9285 greg.stofko@fedex.com

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE



### I hereby certify that the foregoing document has been sent via Federal Express to the following:

Federal AviationAdministration 600 Independence Avenue, SW Wilbur Wright Building

- Suite 2W1000 Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Mr. 

### David Shayne, Attorney Enforcement Division, Western Team 1601 Lind Avenue, SW Renton, WA 98057

Dated this 18thday ofSeptember, 2015.

By: 0 

### ey for Res ondent 1700 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Suite 950 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 393-9285 greg.stofko@fedex.com
EXHIBIT 32.2

                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berthel Growth & Income Trust I (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
O. Brendengen, Chief Financial Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company Planning,
Inc., the Trust Advisor of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


August 12, 2008                             /s/  Ronald O. Brendengen
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Ronald O. Brendengen
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 Berthel Fisher & Company
                                                 Planning, Inc.
                                                 Trust Advisor
                                                 Berthel Growth & Income Trust I
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3474 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow employers to exempt employees with health coverage under 

TRICARE or the Veterans Administration from being 

taken into account for purposes of the employer mandate 

under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3474 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hire More Heroes Act 

3 of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EMPLOYEES WITH HEALTH COVERAGE UNDER 

5 TRICARE OR THE VETERANS ADMINISTRA6 TION MAY BE EXEMPTED FROM EMPLOYER 

7 MANDATE UNDER PATIENT PROTECTION AND 

8 AFFORDABLE CARE ACT. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4980H(c)(2) of the Inter10 nal Revenue Code is amended by adding at the end the 

11 following: 

12 ‘‘(F) EXEMPTION FOR HEALTH COVERAGE

13 UNDER TRICARE OR THE VETERANS ADMINIS14 TRATION.—Solely for purposes of determining 

15 whether an employer is an applicable large em16 ployer under this paragraph for any month, an 

17 employer may elect not to take into account for 

18 a month as an employee any individual who, for 

19 such month, has medical coverage under— 

20 ‘‘(i) chapter 55 of title 10, United 

21 States Code, including coverage under the 

22 TRICARE program, or 

23 ‘‘(ii) under a health care program 

24 under chapter 17 or 18 of title 38, United 

25 States Code, as determined by the Sec26 retary of Veterans Affairs, in coordination 
3 

•HR 3474 EH

1 with the Secretary of Health and Human 

2 Services and the Secretary.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall apply to months beginning after De5 cember 31, 2013. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 11, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3474 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

tient Protection and Affordable Care Act. purposes of the employer mandate under the Paministration from being taken into account for coverage under TRICARE or the Veterans Adallow employers to exempt employees with health
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 0 3
- 00 066
- CR

In re Bryan P. Suhre

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 46133 , HONORABLE JOE CARROLL , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Bryan P. Suhre seeks to appeal an order denying his request for post

- conviction DNA testing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.03, .05 (West Supp. 2003). The order was entered and signed on November 20, 2002. The deadline for perfecting appeal was therefore December 20, 2002. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Notice of appeal was filed on January 2, 2003. No extension of time for filing notice of appeal was requested. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Under the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See
Slat on v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522

- 23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).2 The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________ David Puryear, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: February 13, 2003
Do Not Publish
#### HITE v. BUCHANAN.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 19, 1952.

Ralph John Samuel Hite, pro se.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

MOREMEN, Justice.

The written instruments which have been filed in this case purport to present an appeal from a judgment of the Lyon Circuit Court denying a petition by Ralph John Samuel Hite for a writ of habeas corpus.

Appellant who prosecutes this proceeding, pro se, is confined at the state penitentiary in Eddyville, Ky., under judgment of the Boyd Circuit Court.

Prior to the year 1940, appeals from judgments granting or denying a writ of habeas corpus were not permitted but, under an act of the general assembly of that year, Section 429 of our Criminal Code of Practice was amended and authority to appeal was given. Gray v. Connors, 285 Ky. 229, 147 S.W.2d 384. This act, which is codified as Section 429-1, permits appellate reviews when any party, within ten days after the entry of judgment in the circuit court, files the original record and transcript of the evidence together with notice of appeal which has been properly served on the other interested parties.

In the case at bar appellant has filed an instrument styled “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,” which is accompanied by several exhibits including copies of other petitions for writs of habeas corpus filed in courts other than the Lyon Circuit Court, and opinions of various presiding judges, but appellant has not filed the original record and transcript of evidence nor proceeding had in the Lyon Circuit Court nor the judgment entered from which he now purports to appeal. We have no transcript of *592the record or evidence in any form. No copy of the judgment has been filed.

While Section 429-1 permits appeal, the appeal must be taken in accordance with its requirements, which appellant has not done.

We therefore have before us no record that indicates even in the slightest degree the manner of proceedings had in the Lyon Circuit Court if any, in fact, was had.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.