alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-1696

___________________________

Chad Bennett

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Joseph Mrstik, Police Chief, City Manager; City of Pleasantville, Iowa; Brian

Bigaouette, Deputy Sheriff; Marion County Sheriff's Department

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Central

 ____________

 Submitted: April 23, 2024

Filed: April 29, 2024

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Chad Bennett appeals following the district court’s1

 dismissal of his civil rights

complaint related to the investigation and prosecution of Bennett on state criminal

charges. We grant appellees’ motion requesting that we take judicial notice of certain

filings in the criminal case. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’

arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

1The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Southern District of Iowa.

-2-
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65886-65887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28123]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. 50-298]


Nebraska Public Power District; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Nebraska Public Power District (the licensee) to 
withdraw its June 8, 1999, application for the proposed amendment to 
Facility

[[Page 65887]]

Operating License No. DPR-46 for the Cooper Nuclear Station, located in 
Nemaha County, Nebraska.
    The proposed amendment would have revised the Technical 
Specifications to correct the method by which the Standby Gas Treatment 
System heaters are tested.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on July 14, 
1999 (64 FR 38030). However, by letter dated September 29, 2000, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated June 8, 1999, and the licensee's letter 
dated September 29, 2000, which withdrew the application for license 
amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the 
NRC's Public Document Room, located at One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland, and accessible 
electronically through the ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room link at 
the NRC Web site (http://www.nrc.gov).

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day of October 2000.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Mohan C. Thadani,
Senior Project Manager, Section 1, Project Directorate IV & 
Decommissioning, Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of 
Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 00-28123 Filed 11-01-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                                                                                
                            ACT MANUFACTURING, INC.
                                        
           WEIGHTED SHARES USED IN COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

  Shares used in the net income per common share computation are the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding plus common share equivalents (in
thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Quarter Ended             NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                              --------------------------  --------------------------
                                                                    SEPTEMBER 30,               SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                              --------------------------  --------------------------
                                                                  1997          1996          1997          1996
                                                              ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
<S>                                                           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding .....           9,050         8,772         8,918         8,739
Common share equivalents .................................               0           272           257           272
                                                                     -----         -----         -----         -----

  TOTAL...................................................           9,050         9,044         9,175         9,011
                                                                     =====         =====         =====         =====
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.3


                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

                                     TO THE

                          ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF

                                  CYCO.NET INC.



     Pursuant to the provisions of Section 53-13-4 of the New Mexico Statutes
Annotated, the undersigned corporation adopts the following Articles of
Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation:

     FIRST: The name of the corporation is CYCO.NET INC.

     SECOND: The following Amendments of the Articles of Incorporation were
adopted by the shareholders of the corporation on May 17, 1999 in the manner
prescribed by the New Mexico Business Corporation Act: Article V is deleted and
replaced with the following new Article V:

                                   "Article V

     The aggregate number of shares which the corporation shall have authority
to issue is Ten Million (10,000,000) shares of common stock without par value."

     THIRD: The number of shares of the corporation outstanding at the time of
such adoption of the above Amendments was 52,000. The number of shares entitled
to vote thereon was 52,000.


<PAGE>   2


     FOURTH: The number of shares voting for such Amendments was 52,000. The
number of shares voting against such Amendments was 0.

DATED: May 19, 1999
                                   CYCO.NET INC.

                                   /s/ RICHARD A. URREA
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   Richard A. Urrea, President


                                   /s/ DANIEL URREA
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   Daniel Urrea, Secretary

                                   VERIFICATION

     Under penalty of perjury, I declare that the foregoing document was
executed by the President and Secretary of CYCO.NET INC. and that the statements
contained therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

                                   /s/ DANIEL URREA
                                   --------------------------------
                                   Daniel Urrea, Secretary
**Exhibit 31.02****CERTIFICATIONS****I, Brian R. Day, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:**1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Viseon, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:May 15, 2006
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50012 Summary Calendar JESUS MIRANDA, et al., Plaintiffs, JESUS MIRANDA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CITY OF EL PASO, TEXAS, et al., Defendants, CITY OF EL PASO, TEXAS, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-94-CV-163

- - - - - - - - - - March 27, 1997 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesus Miranda appeals from the district court’s grant of a motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendants in his civil rights suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Miranda argues that the district court erred in granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment because a factual dispute exists with respect to whether his arrest for the drug offenses was supported by probable cause.No. 96-50012 - 2 - Miranda failed to present evidence sufficient to establish the existence of a genuine issue of material fact demonstrating a policy or custom which caused the purported constitutional violation. See Colle v. Brazos County, Tex. , 981 F.2d 237, 244 (5th Cir. 1993). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                    196,963
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             104,848
<ALLOWANCES>                              20,697
<INVENTORY>                               9,137
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          291,799
<PP&E>                                    163,713
<DEPRECIATION>                            39,921
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            415,591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     173,390
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     1
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  1,296
<OTHER-SE>                                240,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              415,591
<SALES>                                   335,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          335,287
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          704,383
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        10,035
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (379,131)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (379,131)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                              (379,131)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (.035)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (.035)



</TABLE>
#### WILEY v. STATE.

No. 26020.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 12, 1952.

No attorney on appeál.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin; for the State.

WOODLEY, 'Commissioner.

Sale of. whisky in a dry area is the offense ; the punishment assessed by the court on a plea of guilty, a fine of $330.

The record contains no statement of facts and no bills of exception, and nothing is presented for review.

'The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3438 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize use of grants 

under the Urban Area Security Initiative and the State Homeland Security Grant Program to work in conjunction with a Department of Energy 

national laboratory. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2013 

Mr. SWALWELL of California (for himself, Mr. SIMPSON, Ms. LOFGREN, Ms. 

MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico, Mr. BEN RAY LUJA ́N of 

New Mexico, Mr. FOSTER, and Mrs. NAPOLITANO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize 

use of grants under the Urban Area Security Initiative 

and the State Homeland Security Grant Program to 

work in conjunction with a Department of Energy national laboratory. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Laboratories 

5 Mean National Security Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3438 IH

1 SEC. 2. USE OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT FUNDS IN 

2 CONJUNCTION WITH DEPARTMENT OF EN3 ERGY NATIONAL LABORATORIES. 

4 Section 2008(a) of the Homeland Security Act of 

5 2002 (6 U.S.C. 609(a)) is amended in the matter pre6 ceding paragraph (1) by inserting ‘‘including by working 

7 in conjunction with a National Laboratory (as defined in 

8 section 2(3) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 

9 15801(3)),’’ after ‘‘plans,’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Jinpan
International Limited (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Li Zhiyuan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

                 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company.

Date: July 15, 2005

                                                      /s/ Li Zhiyuan
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Li Zhiyuan
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
            FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30,
            2000 AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR
            THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            295
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,926
<ALLOWANCES>                                      686
<INVENTORY>                                     9,526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               26,822
<PP&E>                                         19,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                  6,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 44,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           8,092
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            5
<OTHER-SE>                                     36,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   44,802
<SALES>                                        46,239
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               46,239
<CGS>                                          21,457
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  21,457
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               21,517
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,875
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,550
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,325
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,325
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.42



</TABLE>
q.Z2-/s

REC'D IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Court nf Appeals District

/T ^T /ryl o\^dc\ w\uS /*H T6^ atoK - Sry Led

PAM ESTES, CLi

UJC

3/ <-( fC . f A 4-

In Of Ls-*l L^hol

3. Q bo <jf

3) x ,t ,. M °* **" M>'^;

?

'ry.

SiVtceceky

Shori* C*,'h H^3 72&Y
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3343 

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to clarify the rules 

regarding the determination of the compensation of the Chief Financial 

Officer of the District of Columbia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 28, 2013 

Ms. NORTON (for herself and Mr. ISSA) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to clarify 

the rules regarding the determination of the compensation of the Chief Financial Officer of the District of 

Columbia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF DETERMINATION OF COM4 PENSATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

5 OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. 

6 (a) DETERMINATION OF COMPENSATION.—Section 

7 424(b)(2)(E) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3343 IH

1 (sec. 1–204.24(b)(2)(E), D.C. Official Code) is amended 

2 to read as follows: 

3 ‘‘(E) PAY.—The Chief Financial Officer 

4 shall be paid at a rate such that the total 

5 amount of compensation paid during any cal6 endar year does not exceed an amount equal to 

7 the limit on total pay which is applicable during 

8 the year under section 5307 of title 5, United 

9 States Code, to an employee described in sec10 tion 5307(d) of such title.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to pay periods be13 ginning on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### MAYHEW v. McFARLAND.

No. 13977.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

Sept. 5, 1941.

Smith & Smith, of Anson, for appellant.

McCall & McCall, of Weatherford, for appellee.

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a.plea of privilege.

A- sufficient statement of the case will be found in the opinion of the Supreme Court *215dated Tune 18th, 1941, and its opinion on motion for rehearing dated July 23rd, 1941.

Pursuant to the holding of the Supreme Court, appellee’s motion for rehearing is granted, our former judgment in the cause is set aside, our former opinion is withdrawn, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.