alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998             APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997             OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,376,080                  72,948
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,651,767               2,119,406
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,307,956               2,246,530
<PP&E>                                      47,897,521              36,962,822
<DEPRECIATION>                             (17,251,691)            (10,254,970)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,903,335              30,857,487
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,793,035              11,866,608
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0               2,871,114
<COMMON>                                    20,077,486              11,681,150
<OTHER-SE>                                 (15,469,856)            (13,978,300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,903,335              30,857,487
<SALES>                                      3,248,700               2,377,701
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,248,700               2,467,928
<CGS>                                        1,491,276               1,215,659
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,038,472               4,038,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (94,326)                (32,934)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             609,127                 732,151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,304,573)             (2,058,619)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,304,573)             (2,058,619)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,304,573)             (2,224,869)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.04)                  (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)                  (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      10,709,472
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,745,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                   534,407
<INVENTORY>                                 10,354,389
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,073,536
<PP&E>                                      12,854,051
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,205,089
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,972,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,425,308
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,288,595
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,972,151
<SALES>                                     54,092,883
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,092,883
<CGS>                                       47,466,513
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,466,513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,612,805
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,066,056
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,042,459
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,023,597
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,023,597
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berthel Growth & Income Trust I (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
J. Berthel, Chief Executive Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company Planning, Inc.,
the Trust Advisor of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


May 9, 2008                         /s/  Thomas J. Berthel
                                    -----------------------------------
                                         Thomas J. Berthel
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         Berthel Fisher & Company Planning, Inc.
                                         Trust Advisor
                                         Berthel Growth & Income Trust I
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3385 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3385

To amend title 31, United States Code, to require the Secretary of the 
  Treasury to provide for the purchase of paper United States savings 
                        bonds with tax refunds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2013

  Mr. Cartwright (for himself, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Jones, Mr. Olson, Ms. 
Tsongas, Mr. Michaud, Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. Nolan, Mr. Cummings, Ms. Lee of 
    California, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Esty, Mr. Deutch, Mr. Enyart, Mr. 
Conyers, Mr. Holt, Mr. Engel, Mr. Huffman, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. McGovern, 
Mr. Andrews, Mr. Owens, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. O'Rourke, Mr. Fattah, Mr. 
    Tonko, and Ms. Kaptur) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 31, United States Code, to require the Secretary of the 
  Treasury to provide for the purchase of paper United States savings 
                        bonds with tax refunds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Save Access to a Valuable Investment 
Needed to Generate Savings Act of 2013'' or the ``SAVINGS Act''.

SEC. 2. PURCHASE PAPER UNITED STATES SAVINGS BONDS WITH TAX REFUND.

    Section 3106 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(d)(1) During the period ending on December 31, 2018, the 
Secretary shall provide an option on individual returns of tax under 
subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to purchase United 
States savings bonds in paper form with a portion or all of a refund of 
overpayment of such tax for the purchaser or anyone.
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply if the Secretary implements an 
alternative option which--
            ``(A) allows for the gifting of United States savings 
        bonds,
            ``(B) serves the unbanked, and
            ``(C) retains the ability to sign-up on the return of 
        tax.''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-60637

Summary Calendar

 

SERGIO ACOSTA-HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION

SERVICE,

Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals

A93 216 844

- - - - - - - - - -

February 12, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sergio Acosta-Hernandez seeks review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (BIA’s) order denying him discretionary

relief from a final order of exclusion. He asserts that, in

declining to grant him such relief, the Board failed to attach

appropriate weight to his positive attributes and erroneously

placed too great an emphasis on his conviction for possession of

marihuana with intent to distribute.
No. 97-60637 

-2-

Because Acosta’s exclusion proceedings were pending as of

the effective date of the Illegal Immigration Reform and

Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA) but a final order

was not entered until after September 30, 1996, the IIRIRA’s

transitional rules apply to his case. See Lerma de Garcia v.

INS, 141 F.3d 215, 216 (5th Cir. 1998). As a result, this court

is without jurisdiction to hear any appeal from the order of

exclusion or from the Board’s denial of discretionary relief from

this order. See IIRIRA § 309(c)(4)(E) & (G) (codified at 8

U.S.C. § 1101 (Supp. 1998)). Accordingly, this appeal is 

DISMISSED.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 2 - 0017 SNPRM **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 1 - CE - 0 3 9 - AD Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### NO COMMENTS RECEIVED

– If this box is checked, no s ignatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the fol lowing changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because

### Page 2 of 3

**For additional issues, double -**  **click here** 

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:
**ASE Date** 

**Branch Manager Date**
#### CAMPA v. STATE.

No. 23703.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 18, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*940HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for selling beer without a license, punishment assessed being a fine of $500.00.

We do not find in the record either statement o'f facts or bills of exception.

The complaint and information charge the offense.

Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3455 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3455

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 201 East Pikes Peak Avenue in Colorado Springs, Colorado, as the 
     ``Chaplain (Capt.) Dale Goetz Memorial Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 12, 2013

 Mr. Lamborn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 201 East Pikes Peak Avenue in Colorado Springs, Colorado, as the 
     ``Chaplain (Capt.) Dale Goetz Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHAPLAIN (CAPT.) DALE GOETZ MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 201 East Pikes Peak Avenue in Colorado Springs, Colorado, 
shall be known and designated as ``Chaplain (Capt.) Dale Goetz Memorial 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Chaplain 
(Capt.) Dale Goetz Memorial Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3284 

To ensure the complete and timely payment of the obligations of the United 

States Government until December 31, 2014. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 10, 2013 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To ensure the complete and timely payment of the obligations 

of the United States Government until December 31, 2014. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Default Prevention Act 

5 of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENSURING TIMELY PAYMENT. 

7 Section 2 of the No Budget, No Pay Act of 2013 

8 (31 U.S.C. 3101 note) is amended— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3284 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘date of the enactment of this 

2 Act’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘date of 

3 enactment of the Default Prevention Act of 2013’’; 

4 (2) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘May 18, 

5 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’; and 

6 (3) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘May 19, 

7 2013’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘January 

8 1, 2015’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3333 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3333

     To authorize the Federal Emergency Management Agency to award 
mitigation financial assistance in certain areas affected by wildfires.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 23, 2013

Mr. Ruiz (for himself, Mr. Tipton, Mr. Cook, and Mr. Polis) introduced 
      the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To authorize the Federal Emergency Management Agency to award 
mitigation financial assistance in certain areas affected by wildfires.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wildfire Prevention Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. WILDFIRE MITIGATION ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 420 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5187) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Post Disaster Mitigation Assistance.--The President may 
provide hazard mitigation assistance in accordance with section 404 in 
any area in which assistance was provided under this section, whether 
or not a major disaster had been declared.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 
and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 404(a) (42 U.S.C. 5170c(a))--
                    (A) by inserting before the first period ``, or any 
                area in which assistance was provided under section 
                420''; and
                    (B) in the third sentence, by inserting ``or event 
                under section 420'' after ``major disaster'' each place 
                that term appears; and
            (2) in section 322(e)(1) (42 U.S.C. 5165(e)(1)), by 
        inserting ``or event under section 420'' after ``major 
        disaster'' each place that term appears.
                                 <all>
```
#### Reymous HARTLESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 23674.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 26, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The offense is robbery. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of five years.

Since perfecting his appeal, appellant has filed a written motion, duly verified, requesting the privilege of withdrawing the same.

The motion is granted and the appeal is ordered dismissed.
Amendment No. 2 to Asset Purchase Agreement




 Exhibit 10(c) 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 2 to Asset Purchase Agreement
is made as of September 30, 2005 by and between Alfa Financial Corporation and OFC Servicing Corporation. 
 The parties entered into
that certain Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 6, 2005, as amended August 31, 2005 (the “Agreement”), and they now desire to further amend the Agreement as set forth herein. 
 In consideration of the mutual promises made in the Agreement, the parties hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Section 9(a)(2) of the Agreement is amended to change “September 30, 2005” to “October 31, 2005.” 
 2. Section 9(a)(3) of the Agreement is amended to change “September 30, 2005” to “October 31, 2005.” 
 3. The Agreement remains in full force and effect, unamended except as expressly set forth above. 
 In witness whereof, each party has caused this amendment to be executed by its duly officer. 
  

			
	ALFA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ C. Lee Ellis

	Name:	 	C. Lee Ellis
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, Operations
	
	OFC SERVICING CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Richard A. Hills, Jr.

	Name:	 	Richard A. Hills, Jr.
	Title:	 	Vice President
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 7, 2023

No. 04-22-00898-CV

Cynthia RADDATZ, et., al.,

Appellant

v.

Dixie L. DAVIS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CV03555

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

 The reporter’s record was due on February 6, 2023 and was not filed. On February 6, 

2023, the court reporter filed a notification of late record, stating that the reporter’s record has 

not been filed because appellant has failed to request the record in writing. We therefore 

ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court by February 17, 2023 that the appellant 

has requested the court reporter to prepare the reporter’s record, which request must designate 

the portions of the proceedings and the exhibits to be included. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(b)(1). 

The reporter’s record must be filed no later than thirty days after the date appellant’s written 

proof is filed with this court. If appellant fails to request the record in writing, the court will 

consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s 

record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of February, 2023.
___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### CHOATE v. STATE.

No. 23414.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 12, 1946.

*1007Wayne Manning, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

- Ernest S. Goens,. State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is forgery; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. Nothing is presented for the consideration of this Court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.