AFS-12-400-E 

June 22, 2012 

 Exemption No. 7353F 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-12009 

Ms. Sheryl R. Israel, Esq. 

Hogan Lovells US, LLP 

555 Thirteenth Street, NW. 

Washington, DC 20004 

Dear Ms. Israel: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 7353, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect, and lists the 

conditions and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 24, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Chautauqua Airlines, Inc. (Chautauqua), for an extension of Exemption No. 7353, as 

amended. That exemption from § 121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

allows Chautauqua to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman in place of an FAA 

training inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) who is completing initial or 

upgrade training specified in § 121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff 

and a landing. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Chautauqua. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 7353, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. A Chautauqua check airman or aircrew program designee may conduct a PIC 

observation in place of an FAA inspector when— 

a. The Administrator preapproves that substitution for each observation of a 

qualifying PIC candidate, thus reserving first right of refusal to the FAA in 

each case. Chautauqua, therefore, must contact an appropriate FAA office in 

each instance before substituting that check airman or aircrew program 

designee. 

b. The qualifying PIC candidate has completed no less than 10 hours of 

supervised operating expense (OE) and accomplished no fewer than two 

takeoffs and landings; and 

c. The qualifying PIC candidate is performing PIC duties during a complete 

flight leg, including flightdeck preparation, before starting engines checklist, 

takeoff, all other flight phases, landing, taxi, and securing checklist. 

2. Each Chautauqua check airman or aircrew program designee conducting a PIC 

observation in place of an FAA inspector must— 

a. Be approved by the Administrator to conduct the observation; 

b. Have served as check airman or aircrew designee for Chautauqua for no less 

than 6 months; and 

c. Not supervise the OE or conduct the initial line check for the qualifying PIC 

candidate being observed. 
 3

3. Chautauqua must maintain student, check airman, and aircrew program designee 

records that demonstrate compliance with the conditions and limitations of this 

exemption. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 7353, as amended, to 

September 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

John S. Duncan 

Deputy Director, Flight Standards 

 Service