alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ LLOYD J. FLEMING, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. RICHARD COWARD AND P. HEMPHILL, OFFICER #2478, Defendants-Appellees,

AND WALTER W. TWEEDY, POOL, OFFICER, ADRIANNE TODMAN, FRANK LANCASTER, AND LORRY BLUITT BONDS, Defendants-Appellees,

AND ARUN C. WILLIAMS AND PATRICK ASSOUAD, Defendants-Appellees,

AND GARRETT, MOTENAR ROBERSON, JOSEPH DUKES, EBENEZER OLOMO, LARRY LOUCUS, TOM WOODSON, BEEMON FLEMING, JIMMY MCGIVIE, KESHA TAYLOR, JESSICA, RECITA EVANS, STEPHEN WHEELE, KAREN BUSH, AND MEREDITH KOLBRENER, Defendants.

__________________________ Case: 13-1091 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 01/11/2013LLOYD FLEMING V

. RICHARD COWARD 2

2013-1091

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for theDistrict of Columbia in case no. 12-CV-0330, Judge Richard J. Leon.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ O R D E RUpon consideration of Lloyd J. Fleming’s motion seeking various relief from the court,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is denied. (2) Appellees’ briefs are due 21 days from the date of this order.
F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s26 Case: 13-1091 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 01/11/2013
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 16, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Morris S. Young                                                 |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Morris S. YoungChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |

----
fumigant regulations questions

Randy Segawa to: Nancy Levin 06/28/2011 12:56 PM

History: This message has been replied to and forwarded.

Nancy

The resources needed and provided are discussed in the regulations submittal, 

Enclosure 4, pages 98 and 524. The Fiscal Impact Statement on page 98 

cryptically refers to Item 3930-001-0106 of the Budget Act of 2007. This 

amended the Food and Agricultural Code and requires DPR to provide addtional 

funding to county agricultural commissioners if they implement a fumigant 

limit and allowance system. The requirements are specified in Food and 

Agricultural Code section 12841.3, and is available at

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=fac&group=12001-13000&fi

le=12841-12847 

The alternatives analysis, page 2, discusses the various types of pesticide 

regulatory requirements. This section states "Application or use of pesticides 

is regulated at several levels. All pesticide products must have a U.S. 

EPA-approved label that describes the maximum application rate, methods of 

application, crops that can be treated, safety precautions, and other 

requirements. Labels are enforceable documents, and making pesticide 

applications contrary to label directions is a violation of both state and 

federal law. DPR also develops and implements state regulations that can be 

more restrictive than the label. Under state law, county agricultural 

commissioners can also impose additional use requirements through the 

permitting process required for certain pesticides (restricted materials), 

based on an evaluation of local conditions. Growers and applicators are 

required to follow the most stringent use requirements, whether specified by 

labels, state regulations, or county permit conditions. County agricultural 

commissioners are responsible for enforcing all pesticide use requirements, 

under DPR oversight."

Randy
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT 04 February 2005

CASE NUMBER: P05-0186

RELATED CASES:

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX

LEVEL OF CONCERN: 2 3

KEYWORDS: LUNG, IRR-MM,E,S, AQUATOX-A,C

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT

FATE: with 70% <1000 and 50% <500 with N FGEW expect to be very low and expected to be less than 400 and percen t expected to be equa l to greater than 3.5% liquid with mp < 20 C (P) log Kow for and the = 4.0 (EPI) S = 29 mg/L at 25 C, pH 7 (P) but some components are capable of being di spersible in water at pH 7 as the CL salt based on analogs H = 1.2E-7 (P) bp = 290 C (P) vp = 3.5E-3 mm Hg or torr at 25 C (P) log Koc = 3.1 (P) log fish BCF < 2.4 (P) POTW removal = 50 to 90% via sorption time for complete ultimate aer obic biodegradation > months sorption to soils and sediments = low to very strong

PBT Potential: P3B1T1 *CEB FATE: migration to ground water = negligible to rapid

HEALTH: Absorption of the LMW weight fract ions (50% <500 and 70% <1000) is moderate all routes based on physical/chemi cal properties; concern for lung effects if respirable droplets

are inhaled based on cationic bindi ng to lung tissues; concern fo r irritation to all membranes based on the expectation of strong irritation to the eyes, mucous membranes, and skin based on the , NOTE: the MSDS calls the materi al corrosive;moderate concern for irritation

*CEB HEALTH: Inhalation and dermal

ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L (ppm) are:

fish 96-h LC50 <= 0.280 P daphnid 48-h LC50 <= 0.100 P green algal 96-h EC50 <= 0.040 P

fish chronic value <= 0.020 Pdaphnid ChV <= 0.007 P algal ChV <= 0.020 P

Predictions are based on SARs for at pH 7 as CL salt with dilution water hardness < 150 mg/L as CaCO3 and TOC < 2.0 mg/L; SA R chemical class = and); (lowest) to >1000 with 70% < 1000 and 48% <500; pH7; effe ctive concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; ha rdness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; high concern for toxicity significant mitigation of toxicity may occur in the presence of 10 mg TOC/L, i.e.,as high as about 60X, but cannot be predicted for this reaction product; m oderate concern for

environmental risk assessment factor = 10.0 concern concentration = 0.010 mg/L (ppm) with at least 10X mitigation of toxicity expected in the presence of 10 mg TOC/L

*CEB ECOTOX: All releases to water with CC = 10 ppb

SAT co-chair: Vince Nabholz, 564.8909
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3337 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize payment of expenses 

for a stopover of the remains of decedents covered by section 1481 

of such title en route to the final destination. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 23, 2013 

Mr. TONKO (for himself, Mr. GIBSON, and Mr. OWENS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize payment 

of expenses for a stopover of the remains of decedents 

covered by section 1481 of such title en route to the 

final destination. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘LTC Todd J. Clark 

5 Hero Flight Act of 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3337 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF PAYMENT OF EXPENSES OF 

2 STOPOVER OF REMAINS EN ROUTE TO FINAL 

3 DESTINATION. 

4 Section 1482(a)(8) of title 10, United States Code, 

5 is amended by striking ‘‘the place selected by the person’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘the place selected, and one stopover (either 

7 by direct or indirect routing) if requested, by the person’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                                          0000935499
<NAME>                                     The Rattlesnake Holding Company, Inc.

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         3,660,354
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     21,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       16,028
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,699,225
<PP&E>                                           268,948
<DEPRECIATION>                                   188,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,887,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,487,397
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                       30,710
<COMMON>                                          29,506
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,110,755
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,887,541
<SALES>                                        1,421,073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,365,409
<CGS>                                          1,534,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,949,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 223,292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               196,340
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (3,004,079)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (3,004,079)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  343,310
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,660,769)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.17)


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 31, 2014

s0127

Order 

Clerk

January 31, 2014

147811

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147811

COA: 301758

Wayne CC: 10-001495-FC

DARRELL RASHARD EWING,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 29, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### EO 12866/13563 review -- Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2012 Critical Use Exemption From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide Frey, Nathan J. to: Jeremy Arling, Drusilla Hufford 09/09/2011 10:48 AM Cc: Nicole Owens History: This message has been forwarded. 

### Attached are additional interagency comments on the 2012 MeBr CUE proposed rule. Please let me know if you have any questions. EO12866MethylBromideCUE2060-AQ83NPRM20110818v3_Summary of Interagency Comments(2).docx
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Uziel Frydman, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of Sherwood Brands, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to 

adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:
 
October 1, 2003
              
/s/    UZIELFRYDMAN        
        
Uziel Frydman

Chief Executive Officer
(XURSH %UHQW 6SRW 3ULFH )2% 'ROODUV SHU %DUUHO

KWWSZZZHLDJRYGQDYSHWKLVW/HDI+DQGOHUDVK["Q SHW	V UEUWH	I P 

3(752/(80 	 27+(5 /,48,'6

29(59,(: '$ $1$/<6,6 	 352-(&7,216 */266$5< 3⁄4 )$46 3⁄4 7$

5HIHUULQJ 3DJHV

6SRW 3ULFHV IRU &UXGH 2LO DQG 3HWUROHXP 3URGXFWV

9LHZ +LVWRU\ 'DLO\ :HHNO\ 0RQWKO\ $QQXDO 'RZQORDG 'DWD ;/6 )LOH

&KDUW 7RROV

QR DQDO\VLV DSSOLHG

7KLV VHULHV LV DYDLODEOH WKURXJK WKH (,$ RSHQ GDWD $3, DQG FDQ EH GRZQORDGHG WR ([FHO RU HPEHGGHG DV DQ LQWHUDFWLYH FKDUW RU PDS RQ \RXU ZHEVLWH

(XURSH %UHQW 6SRW 3ULFH )2% 'ROODUV SHU %DUUHO

<HDU -DQ )HE 0DU $SU 0D\ -XQ -XO $XJ 6HS 2FW 1RY 'HF

        

            

            

            

            

            

            

            

            

            

            

            

            

            

            

            

            

            

            

            

            

            

'2:1/2$'

'ROODUV SHU %DUUHO

(XURSH %UHQW 6SRW 3ULFH )2%

(XURSH %UHQW 6SRW 3ULFH )2%

              









'DWD 6RXUFH 7KRPVRQ 5HXWHUV
 (XURSH %UHQW 6SRW 3ULFH )2% 'ROODUV SHU %DUUHO

KWWSZZZHLDJRYGQDYSHWKLVW/HDI+DQGOHUDVK["Q SHW	V UEUWH	I P 

            

            

            

            

            

            

            

 1R 'DWD 5HSRUWHG  1RW $SSOLFDEOH 1$ 1RW $YDLODEOH : :LWKKHOG WR DYRLG GLVFORVXUH RI LQGLYLGXDO FRPSDQ\ GDWD

5HOHDVH 'DWH 

1H[W 5HOHDVH 'DWH 

5HIHUULQJ 3DJHV

6SRW 3ULFHV IRU &UXGH 2LO DQG 3HWUROHXP 3URGXFWV
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3487 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act to extend 

through 2018 the authority of the Federal Election Commission to impose civil money penalties on the basis 

of a schedule of penalties established and published by 

the Commission, to expand such authority to certain 

other violations, and for other purposes. 
2 

•HR 3487 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY AU4 THORITY OF FEDERAL ELECTION COMMIS5 SION THROUGH 2018. 

6 Section 309(a)(4)(C)(iv) of the Federal Election 

7 Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(4)(C)(iv)) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘December 31, 2018’’. 

10 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY AU11 THORITY OF FEDERAL ELECTION COMMIS12 SION. 

13 (a) APPLICATION TO QUALIFIED DISCLOSURE RE14 QUIREMENTS.—Section 309(a)(4)(C)(i) of the Federal 

15 Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 

16 437g(a)(4)(C)(i)) is amended by striking ‘‘any require17 ment of section 304(a) of the Act (2 U.S.C. 434(a))’’ and 

18 inserting ‘‘a qualified disclosure requirement’’. 

19 (b) SCHEDULE OF PENALTIES FOR EACH VIOLA20 TION.—Section 309(a)(4)(C)(i)(II) of the Federal Elec21 tion Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 

22 437g(a)(4)(C)(i)(II)) is amended by inserting ‘‘, for viola23 tions of each qualified disclosure requirement,’’ before 

24 ‘‘under a schedule of penalties’’. 
3 

•HR 3487 EH

1 (c) DEFINITION OF QUALIFIED DISCLOSURE RE2 QUIREMENT.—Section 309(a)(4)(C) of the Federal Elec3 tion Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(4)(C)) is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating clause (iv), as amended by 

6 section 1, as clause (v); and 

7 (2) by inserting after clause (iii) the following 

8 new clause: 

9 ‘‘(iv) In this subparagraph, the term 

10 ‘qualified disclosure requirement’ means any re11 quirement of— 

12 ‘‘(I) subsections (a), (c), (e), (f), (g), 

13 or (i) of section 304; or 

14 ‘‘(II) section 305.’’. 

15 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

16 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 

17 on the earlier of— 

18 (1) December 31, 2013; or 

19 (2) the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 18, 

2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3487 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act to 

and for other purposes. expand such authority to certain other violations, tablished and published by the Commission, to alties on the basis of a schedule of penalties esElection Commission to impose civil money penextend through 2018 the authority of the Federal
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Raymond M. Withy, Ph.D., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Abgenix, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Dated:
March 11, 2004

| |  | /s/RAYMOND M. WITHYRaymond M. Withy, Ph.D. President and Chief Executive
Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 142 (Tuesday, July 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 43275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18047]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Notice of Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Friday August 24, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered

    Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the event that the times 
or dates of these or any future meetings change, an announcement of the 
change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted 
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-18047 Filed 7-20-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
1 Cite as: 553 U. S. ____ (2008)

Statement of S TEVENS , J. 

## SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

JAMES FRAZIER v. OHIO

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
No. 07–9052. Decided April 21, 2008 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Statement of J USTICE S TEVENS respecting the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari. While I agree with the Court’s decision to deny certio

rari in this case, it is appropriate to emphasize, as I have in the past, see, e.g., Knight v. Florida , 528 U. S. 990 (1999) (opinion respecting denial of certiorari); Singleton

v. Commissioner , 439 U. S. 940, 942 (1978) (same), that the denial of certiorari expre sses no opinion on the merits of the underlying claim.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Synergistics, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned President and Treasurer of the Company, certifies, to
the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



 /s/_DAVID S. LONGWORTH___                              /s/_James French_______
 President                                              Treasurer


 Date:  August 9,2002                                   Date:  August 9, 2002