alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,637
<SECURITIES>                                    19,389
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,794
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,593
<PP&E>                                           4,994
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,417
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,291
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,456
<SALES>                                          9,038
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,038
<CGS>                                              498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (712)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (712)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (712)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)<F1>
<FN>
<F1> In the first half of 1997, common share equivalents,
if included, would have an anti-dilutive effect on the 
net loss per share calculation, and are therefore 
excluded from the fully diluted calculation. If included,
the net loss per share would be $0.01 per share.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      23.1





**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





The
      Board
      of Directors


iPass,
      Inc.:





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
      333-107315, 333-118295, 333-130064, and 333-131879) on Form S-8 of iPass, Inc.
      of our reports dated March 28, 2007, with respect to the consolidated
      balance sheets of iPass, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and
      2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’
equity, and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years
      in
      the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, management’s assessment of
      the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
      December 31, 2006, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the
      December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of iPass, Inc.




Our
      report on the consolidated financial statements
      refers to iPass Inc.'s adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial
      Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), *Shared-Based
      Payment*, effective January 1, 2006.





/s/
      KPMG
      LLP


Mountain
      View, California


March 28,
      2007
#### ARNETT et al. v. FARRIS et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 15, 1951.

Chester A. Bach, Jackson, for appellants.

G. C. Allen, Jackson, M. F. Patrick, Sal-yersville, for appellees.

CAMMACK, Chief Justice;

This appeal is from a judgment setting aside a deed dated October 15, 1925, from A. C. Cooper to one of his daughters, Mrs. Lillie Arnett, the appellant in this action. Cooper died in June, 1930. He was survived by his widow, Mrs. Sarah Cooper, several children, including Mrs. Lillie Ar-nett, and a son of a deceased daughter. Immediately after the death of her father Mrs. Arnett instituted an action wherein she sought a division of her father’s real estate. A division of the land was had and the tract, which is the subject of this litigation, was set aside to Mrs. Cooper as her dower interest. Two day's after Mrs. Cooper’s death in January, 1946, Mrs. Arnett lodged for record the 1925 deed which conveyed to her the identical property which had been set aside to her mother, Mrs. Cooper, as dower.

The other heirs filed this action seeking to set aside the deed on the ground that Mr. Cooper was not mentally capable of disposing of his property in 1925, and the purported deed was a forgery.

As is usually true in cases of this kind, there is sharp conflict in the proof, especially that surrounding the execution of the deed. There was some proof showing that Mr. Cooper was not capable of making a deed in 1925, five years before his death. However, it does not appear upon which ground the chancellor based his decision. We think, however, there was sufficient evidence to support a finding that the deed was a forgery.

There are present some rather unusual circumstances in this case. When Mr. Cooper died in 1930, Mrs. Arnett was the heir who first sought a division of his real estate. She said nothing at that time about having a deed to a part of the land. Mrs. Sarah Cooper took possession of the land Mrs. Arnett now claims and lived on it 16 years. During that period nothing was said about the deed. Only two days after her mother’s death Mrs. Arnett had the deed recorded. She attempted to explain her failure to have it recorded earlier by saying that her father requested her to withhold its recordation until after he and Mrs. Cooper had died. Certainly there is more than a suspicion of irregularity under *641these circumstances. There was proof that the signatures on the deeds were authentic, and there was proof that they were forgeries.

Since we have no more than a doubt on the whole case as to the correctness of the chancellor’s ruling, we are disposed to approve his finding.

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                                 Subsidiaries

The following are subsidiaries of ACT Manufacturing, Inc. and all are
wholly-owned except for GSS Array Technology Public Company Limited of which ACT
Manufacturing owns 99.02%:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Entity Name                                             Jurisdiction of Organization
-----------                                             ----------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>
Advanced Component Technologies Limited                            Ireland
ACT Manufacturing Securities Corp.                              Massachusetts
CMC Industries, Inc.                                               Delaware
ACT France Holdings SAS                                             France
ACT Manufacturing US Holdings, LLC                                 Delaware
GSS Array Technology Public Company Limited                        Thailand

The following are subsidiaries of CMC Industries, Inc.:

Entity Name                                             Jurisdiction of Incorporation
-----------                                             -----------------------------

CMC Inmuebles, S.A. de C.V.                                         Mexico
CMC Industrias Hermosillo, S.A. de C.V.                             Mexico
Servicos y Administracion de Sonora, S.A. de C.V.                   Mexico
CMC Industries, Inc. Taiwan Branch (U.S.A.)                         Taiwan

The following are subsidiaries of ACT France Holdings SAS:

Entity Name                                             Jurisdiction of Incorporation
-----------                                             -----------------------------

ACT France SAS                                                      France
ACT Manufacturing France SA                                         France
</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

October 15, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00236

- CR

EX PARTE MICHAEL PAUL

From the 25th Judicial District Court , Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19

- 1 544

- CR

- A Honorable William D. Old III , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R
Appellant’s brief was due on September 6 , 2021

. On September 22, 2021 , after no brief or motion for extension of time to file the brief was filed, we ordered Appellant to file the brief

or a motion to dismiss by October 4, 2021

. We warned Appellant that if he did not comply with our order, we would abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. To date, Appellant has not filed the brief or a further motion for extension of time to file the brief.
W e ABATE this appeal and REMAND t he cause to the trial court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b); Samaniego v. State , 952 S.W.2d 50, 52

– 53 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.). We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing in compliance with Rule 38.8(b) to answer the following questions: ( 1) Does Appellant desire to prosecute his appeal?
(2) Though Appellant is not entitled to appointed counsel in a habeas appeal , do the interests of justice require it in this case?

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b). The trial court is further ORDERED to file supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records in this court, not later than THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order, which shall include the following: (1) a transcription of the hearing and copies of any documentar y evidence admitted, (2) written findings of fact and conclusions of law, and (3) recommendations addressing the above enumerated questions. See id. This court will consider the supplemental records in its determination as to whether to proceed without b riefs

. See id. R. 38.8(b); Samaniego v. State , 952 S.W.2d at 53

.All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHERE OF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 15th day of October, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      5
<CIK>                                                         0000937598
<NAME>                                           Periphonics Corporation
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                               DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                 FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                                            14,640
<SECURITIES>                                                       8,988
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     40,540
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      (1,466)
<INVENTORY>                                                       17,256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  83,444
<PP&E>                                                            46,012
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    26,344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   103,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             25,429
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                             139
<OTHER-SE>                                                        78,036
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     103,604
<SALES>                                                           32,029
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  32,029
<CGS>                                                             15,888
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     15,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  14,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    2,111
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         792
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                1,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       1,319
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.10
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3324 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3324

    To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to reduce burdensome 
                   paperwork, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 23, 2013

Mr. Harris (for himself and Mr. Fleming) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to reduce burdensome 
                   paperwork, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``The Lacey Act Paperwork Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO LACEY ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1981.

    Section 3(f) of the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 (16 U.S.C. 
3372(f)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by--
                    (A) striking ``files'' and inserting ``possesses 
                and has available for inspection by the Secretary, 
                acting through the United States Fish and Wildlife 
                Service, if so requested,''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), striking clause (i) and 
                inserting the following:
                            ``(i) the declared value of the plant or 
                        the merchandise containing the plant;''; and
            (2) by striking paragraph (6) and inserting the following:
            ``(6) Regulations.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary, acting through 
                the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and in 
                consultation with the Animal and Health Inspection 
                Service, may issue, in accordance with section 553 of 
                title 5, United States Code, such regulations as may be 
                necessary to carry out this subsection.
                    ``(B) Distinction; limitation on applicability.--In 
                promulgating such regulations, the Secretary may--
                            ``(i) distinguish among different species; 
                        and
                            ``(ii) limit the applicability of this 
                        subsection to a particular class or type of 
                        species if the Secretary determines that 
                        application of this subsection would not be 
                        feasible, practicable, or effective.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT  32.2
                                                                    ------------

                             CERTIFICATIONS  PURSUANT  TO
                  SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002
                            (18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350)

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Hyperdynamics  Corporation
(Hyperdynamics), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Steven M. Plumb,
Chief  Financial  Officer of Hyperdynamics, does hereby certify, pursuant to 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.


Date:  December  8,  2005

(signed)  __________________
By:       /s/  Steven  M.  Plumb
          Steven  M.  Plumb
          Chief  Financial  Officer
ISAAC J. HARVIS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 2303

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed September 5, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Elijah Smiley , Judge

.

Isaac J. Harvis , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate , Assistant Attorney

General, Tal lahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., CONCUR.
#### BARBER v. STATE.

No. 24851.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 10, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

■ George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged in -the County Court at Law of.. Travis-County by com*808plaint and information with the offense of unlawfully operating a motor vehicle upon a public street while he was under the influence of intoxicating liquor. He plead not guilty to such charge, but was found guilty 'by a jury and his penalty assessed at a fine of fifty dollars, from which judgment this appeal is perfected.

Neither statement of facts nor bills of exceptions are brought forward in the record. The proceedings appear to be regular, and the judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Berthel Growth & Income Trust I (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
J. Berthel, Chief Executive Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company Planning, Inc.,
the Trust Advisor of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



May 9, 2007                         /s/  Thomas J. Berthel
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                         Thomas J. Berthel
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         Berthel Fisher & Company Planning, Inc.
                                         Trust Advisor
                                         Berthel Growth & Income Trust I
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               9
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             4,477
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             7,047
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   9,225
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       33,564
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            33,369
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              33,864
<LOANS>                                          179,557
<ALLOWANCE>                                        1,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   272,657
<DEPOSITS>                                       221,720
<SHORT-TERM>                                           0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               11,707
<LONG-TERM>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             531
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                        38,699
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   272,657
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    3,575
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    877
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                       0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   4,452
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 2,241
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 2,241
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              2,211
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                         60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 1,615
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    1,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    2,453
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         2,453
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                       1,683
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.95
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      7.71
<LOANS-NON>                                           99
<LOANS-PAST>                                         321
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     131
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   1,238
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                         18
<RECOVERIES>                                          14
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  1,294
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               1,294
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                0
        

</TABLE>