alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65884-65885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28072]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Central Liquidity Facility; Correction

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA)

ACTION: Proposed Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement (IRPS) 00-02; 
correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NCUA published in the Federal Register of October 25, 
2000, a proposed Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement (IRPS) 00-02, 
Central Liquidity Facility Advance Policy. It incorrectly stated that 
comments on the proposed IRPS must be received on or before December 
26, 2000. This correction gives the correct deadline for comments.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 23, 2001.

[[Page 65885]]


ADDRESSES: Comments should be directed to Becky Baker, Secretary of the 
Board. Mail or hand-deliver comments to: National Credit Union 
Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428. You may 
also fax comments to (703) 518-6319 or e-mail comments to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#15777a74677178747c79557b7660743b727a63"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="096b66687b6d6468606549676a7c68276e667f">[email protected]</span></a>. Please send comments by one method only.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. Owen Cole, Jr., Vice President, 
CLF, at (703) 518-6360 or Frank S. Kressman, Staff Attorney, at (703) 
518-6540.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NCUA published in the Federal Register 
of October 25, 2000, a proposed IRPS 00-02, Central Liquidity Facility 
Advance Policy. 65 FR 63892 (October 25, 2000). It incorrectly stated 
that comments on the proposed IRPS must be received on or before 
December 26, 2000. This correction changes the deadline for receipt of 
comments to January 23, 2001.

    Dated: October 27, 2000.
Becky Baker,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-28072 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### CHRISTIAN v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 12, 1951.

F. M. Jones, Harlan, for appellant.

A. E. Funk, Atty. Gen., Walter C. Herd-man, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

CLAY, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted of operating an automobile without the owner’s consent, and was sentenced to serve three years in the state reformatory. On this appeal he urges: (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction, and (2)' he was entitled to an instruction covering his defense.

A new Studebaker car was stolen from Clarence Coleman. About 6:30 the next morning two members of the Fayette County Police Patrol found the car stopped on a highway near Lexington. Appellant, with four other boys, was attempting to push the car up a hill because it was out of gasoline. One of' the officers testified appellant stated he was the driver of the car. When the officers became suspicious, appellant attempted to escape. The County Judge of Harlan County testified appellant had told him that he had taken the car.

Appellant’s defense was that one of the other boys was driving the car and he was simply a passenger without knowledge it had been stolen.

Appellant argues that because there was no direct proof that he took or operated the automobile, the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction. He was, however, with the others in joint possession of a stolen automobile. It was not necessary that he actually drive it. Lunce v. Commonwealth, 289 Ky. 706, *160*S.W.2d 3. In addition, there is testimony he admitted he was. the driver, and he was attempting to escape. This proof was- ample as a basis for the conviction.

Appellant’s, defense was that he did not know the car was stolen, and was simply a passenger. The court did not give a specific instruction covering this, defense. In Hobbs v. Commonwealth, 156 Ky. 847, 162 S.W. 104, and Mays v. Commonwealth, 265 Ky. 558, *97*S.W.2d 419, this Court has held that under similar circumstances, such instruction should be given.

The failure of the- trial court to- do- so' constitutes reversible error.

The judgment is reversed' for a new trial..
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00119

- CR

J ASON S COTT D AVIS

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Ap peal from the 372nd District Court

of Tarrant County ( 1672108D )

March 7, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s ju dg ment s . It is ordered that the judgment s of the

trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
#### Yoakam, Admr., Appellant, *v.*The Osgood Co. et al., Appellees.

(No. 28224

Decided October 2, 1940.)

*Mr. Paul D. Smith*and *Mr. Thomas H. Sutherland,*for appellant.

*318
      *Messrs. Bushnell, Burgess, Fulton & Chandler, Mr. Charles 0. Chandler*and *Mr. Ben T. Wiant,*for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right he, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause. *. . .*

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
#### CHOATE v. STATE.

No. 234! 3.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 12, 1946.

Wayne Manning, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is forgery; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. Nothing is presented for the consideration of this Court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2686

EMMETT JOHNSON JAFARI, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus CITY OF RICHMOND, Municipal Corporation;ROBERT C. BOBB, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as City Manager; JERRY JOHNSON, Individually, and in his Official Capacity asDeputy City Manager; JOHN A. RUPP, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as City Attorney; L. CHESTER BRAZZELL, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as Director of Personnel; JEFFREY WOODSON, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Facilities; L. ANGEL JONES, Individually, and in her OfficialCapacity as Deputy Director of Parks, Recreation, and Community Facilities, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 99-1211

EMMETT JOHNSON JAFARI, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus2ROBERT C. BOBB, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as City Manager; JERRY JOHNSON, Individually, and in his Official Capacity asDeputy City Manager; JEFFREY WOODSON, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Facilities, Defendants - Appellees, and CITY OF RICHMOND, Municipal Corporation; JOHNA. RUPP, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as City Attorney; L. CHESTER BRAZZELL, Individually, and in his Official Capacity asDirector of Personnel; L. ANGEL JONES, Individually, and in her Official Capacity as Deputy Director of Parks, Recreation, and Community Facilities, Defendants.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-419-3) Submitted: April 20, 1999 Decided: July 13, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Emmett Johnson Jafari, Appellant Pro Se. Beverly Agee Burton, Assistant City Attorney Keith Allen May, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Emmett Johnson Jafari appeals two district court orders, the first order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, denying his motion for entry of default judgment, and dismissing his sexual discrimination claims under Title VII for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, and the second order granting Defendants Bobb’s, Woodson’s, and Johnson’s motions to dismiss and denying Jafari’s motion for entry of default judgment against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jafari v. City of Richmond, No. CA-98-419-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 13, 1998 and Jan. 12, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Agenda

Siloxane ECA Negotiation

June 27, 2012, 10:00 AM – 1:00 PM, Room 1117A EPA East

10:00 Introductions, Purpose, Goals, and Objectives Paul Lewis, EPA

10:10 Identification interested parties Paul Lewis, EPA

10:30 Industry presentation Karluss Thomas, SEHSC

11:00 Interested Party comments Paul Lewis, EPA

11:30 EPA’s response Ward Penberthy, EPA

12:00 Discussion/summation/resolution Participants 

12:45 Next steps Paul Lewis, EPA

1:00 Adjourn

Agenda times are approximate.

The Docket number for this enforceable consent agreement is EPA-HQ-OPPT-2012-0209. This 

docket can be found at regulations.gov 

http://www.regulations.gov/#!searchResults;rpp=25;po=0;s=epa-hq-oppt-2012-0209 .

Contact Bob Jones at jones.robert@epa.gov or 202-564-8161 for further information.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6175-6176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2824]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE AGREEMENTS


Establishment of a New Export Visa Arrangement and New 
Certification Stamp for Outward Processed Goods for Certain Cotton, 
Wool, Man-Made Fiber, Silk Blend and Other Vegetable Fiber Textiles and 
Textile Products Produced or Manufactured in Romania; Amendment

February 2, 2000.
    In the letter to the Commissioner of Customs published in the 
Federal Register on December 14, 1999 (64 FR 69744), insert the 
following sentence on page 69746, 1st column, 6th paragraph, line 20, 
right above ``General Provisions'': ``Any shipment which is declared 
for the Outward Processing Program but found not to qualify may be

[[Page 6176]]

permanently denied entry into the United States.''

Troy H. Cribb,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc. 00-2824 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-F
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                              EXHIBIT 12


                                                               MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV
                                                                MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.
                                                                 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                                                   COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                                          (dollars in thousands)



                                   FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                    DECEMBER 31, 2004                  DECEMBER 26, 2003                  DECEMBER 27, 2002
                           ---------------------------------  ---------------------------------  ----------------------------------
                              MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                                 PREFERRED       PREFERRED          PREFERRED       PREFERRED        PREFERRED       PREFERRED
                           CAPITAL TRUST IV  FUNDING IV,L.P.  CAPITAL TRUST IV  FUNDING IV,L.P.  CAPITAL TRUST IV  FUNDING IV, L.P.
                           ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ----------------

<S>                        <C>                 <C>            <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>

Earnings                       $ 29,361           $ 34,265        $ 29,361           $ 34,257         $ 29,361            $ 34,303
                               ========           ========        ========           ========         ========            ========


Fixed charges                  $      -           $      -        $      -           $      -         $      -            $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution
 requirements                    28,480             29,361          28,480             29,361           28,480              29,361
                               --------           --------        --------           --------         --------            --------

Total combined fixed
 charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirements                  $ 28,480           $ 29,361          28,480           $ 29,361         $ 28,480            $ 29,361
                               ========           ========        ========           ========         ========            ========

Ratio of earnings to
 combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements         1.03               1.17            1.03               1.17             1.03                1.17


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 203 (Thursday, October 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 62749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26881]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming; Notice of Approved Tribal State Compact

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 
1988 (IGRA), Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved 
Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming 
activities on Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has 
approved the Tribal-State Compact between the State of California and 
the Pauma Band of Mission Indians, which was executed on May 1, 2000.

DATES: This action is effective October 19, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC, 
20240 (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: October 6, 2000.
Kevin Gover,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-26881 Filed 10-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 214 (Friday, November 3, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66282-66283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ending September 29, 2000

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 
CFR 302.1701 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each 
application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-2000-7121.
    Date Filed: September 25, 2000.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: October 16, 2000.
    Description: Application of AOM-Minerve, S.A. (``AOM'') pursuant to 
49 U.S.C. Section 41302 and Subpart B, requests an amendment of its 
foreign air carrier permit to include New Caledonia in its route 
description.

    Docket Number: OST-2000-8015.
    Date Filed: September 25, 2000.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: October 16, 2000.
    Description: Application of Sun Air Express, LLC. pursuant to 49 
U.S.C. 41738 and Subpart B, requests authority to engage in scheduled 
commuter passenger operations.

    Docket Number: OST-2000-8029.
    Date Filed: September 28, 2000.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: October 19, 2000.
    Description: Application of Brendan Air, LLC (``Brendan Airways'') 
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 41102 and Subpart B, submits this application for 
a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing 
interstate and overseas charter air transportation of persons, 
property, and mail.

    Docket Number: OST-2000-8030.
    Date Filed: September 28, 2000.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: October 19, 2000.
    Description: Application of Brendan Air, LLC (``Brendan Airways'') 
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Section and Subpart B,

[[Page 66283]]

submits this application for a certificate of public convenience and 
necessity authorizing foreign charter air transportation of persons, 
property, and mail.

Dorothy Y. Beard,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-28254 Filed 11-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
Presidential Documents

62575

Federal Register

Vol. 65, No. 202

Wednesday, October 18, 2000

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 7364 of October 16, 2000

Amending Proclamation 7362, Display of the Flag at HalfStaff as a Mark of Respect for Those Who Died on the

United States Ship Cole

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

By the authority vested in me as President of the United States by the

Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order

to extend the display of the flag at half-staff as a mark of respect for

those who died on the United States Ship COLE, it is hereby ordered

that Proclamation 7362 of October 12, 2000, is amended by deleting in

the first sentence the words ‘‘Monday, October 16’’ and inserting in their

place the words ‘‘Wednesday, October 18.’’

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixteenth day

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand, and of the Independence

[FR Doc. 00–26987

Filed 10–17–00; 10:51 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P

of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fifth.

œ–
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Danielle N. Stevens, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from amended judgments of the City Court of Beacon, Dutchess County (Timothy G. Pagones, J.), rendered May 7, 2014. The amended judgments revoked defendant's sentences of two concurrent terms of three years' probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that defendant violated conditions thereof, upon her admission, and imposed sentences of two consecutive terms of one-year incarceration, upon her previous convictions of petit larceny and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree.</p><p>ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.</p><p>On June 19, 2013, defendant pleaded guilty to petit larceny (Penal Law ยง 155.25) and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree (Penal Law ยง 165.05). She was enrolled in a drug court program and was promised that, if she completed the program, the charges would be adjourned in contemplation of dismissal. However, defendant failed to complete the program and, on January 22, 2014, she was sentenced to two concurrent terms of three years' probation. On May 7, 2014, defendant's sentences of probation were revoked, upon a finding that defendant had violated conditions thereof, upon her admission, and the City Court imposed sentences of two consecutive terms of one-year incarceration. </p><p>Defendant did not appeal from the judgments of conviction rendered on January 22, 2014. Therefore, on this appeal from the amended judgments, she is foreclosed from challenging the propriety of the original judgments, including the validity of her pleas of guilty (<a href="../2009/2009_06256.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Sansone</i>, 65 AD3d 636</a> [2009]; <a href="../2008/2008_03251.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Trias</i>, 50 AD3d 828</a> [2008]; <a href="../2012/2012_51806.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Kristich</i>, 36 Misc 3d 158</a>[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 51406[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th &amp; 10th Jud Dists 2012]). Defendant's contention that the sentences of incarceration imposed by the City Court, upon a finding that defendant had violated conditions of probation, which she had admitted to, were excessive is academic because defendant has served her sentences and has been released from custody (<a href="../2006/2006_05391.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Nicholson</i>, 31 AD3d 468</a> [2006]; <a href="../2016/2016_50207.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Rainey</i>, 50 Misc 3d 142</a>[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 50207[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th &amp; 10th Jud Dists 2016]; <a href="../2007/2007_51481.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Canada</i>, 16 Misc 3d 132</a>[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 51481[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th &amp; 10th Jud Dists 2007]).</p><p>Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.</p><p>Iannacci, J.P., Marano and Tolbert, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: May 25, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>