### 63809 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 207 / Monday, October 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

which U.S. producers of other mandarin varieties may be affected would depend upon the quantity imported, the degree to which consumers may substitute Unshu oranges for the other mandarin varieties, and their price competitiveness.

Under these circumstances, the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Executive Order 12988

This final rule allows Unshu oranges to be imported into the continental United States from Japan. State and local laws and regulations regarding Unshu oranges imported under this rule will be preempted while the fruit is in foreign commerce. Fresh fruits are generally imported for immediate distribution and sale to the consuming public, and remain in foreign commerce until sold to the ultimate consumer. The question of when foreign commerce ceases in other cases must be addressed on a case-by-case basis. No retroactive effect will be given to this rule, and this rule will not require administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule. Paperwork Reduction Act

In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ), the information collection or recordkeeping requirements included in this final rule, which were filed under 0579–0418, have been submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). When OMB notifies us of its decision, if approval is denied, we will publish a document in the Federal Register providing notice of what action we plan to take. E-Government Act Compliance

The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to compliance with the E-Government Act to promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. For information pertinent to E-Government Act compliance related to this rule, please contact Ms. Kimberly Hardy, APHIS’ Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851–2727. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319

Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs, Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Rice, Vegetables. Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 319 as follows:

**PART 319–FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 319 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S. C. 450, 7701–7772, and 7781–7786; 21 U.S. C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.

■ 2. Section 319.28 is amended as follows:

■ a. In paragraph (b) introductory text, by removing the words ‘‘paragraph (b)(7)’’ and adding the words ‘‘paragraph (b)(8)’’ in their place.

■ b. By revising paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(4).

■ c. By redesignating current paragraphs (b)(5), (b)(6), and (b)(7) as paragraphs (b)(6), (b)(7), and (b)(8), respectively.

■ d. By adding a new paragraph (b)(5).

■ e. By adding an OMB citation at the end of the section.

The additions and revisions read as follows:

**§ 319.28 Notice of quarantine.**
* * * * *

(b) * * * (1) The Unshu oranges must be imported in commercial consignments that are practically free of leaves, twigs, and other plant parts, except for stems that are less than 1 inch long and attached to the fruit.

(2) In Unshu orange export areas on Kyushu Island, Japan, trapping for the citrus fruit fly (Bactrocera tsuneonis) must be conducted as prescribed by the Japanese Government’s Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. If fruit flies are detected, then shipping will be suspended from the export area until negative trapping shows the problem has been resolved.

(3) Before packing, the oranges must be given a surface sterilization in accordance with part 305 of this chapter.

(4) The packinghouse in which the surface sterilization treatment is applied and the fruit is packed must be registered with the Japanese Government’s Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries.

(5) Unshu oranges imported from Japan must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by the Japanese Government’s Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries with an additional declaration that the Unshu oranges were packed and produced in accordance with 7 CFR
319.28.
* * * * * (Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 0579–0173, 0579–0314, and 0579–0418)

Done in Washington, DC, this 21st day of October 2014. Kevin Shea, Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–25469 Filed 10–24–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–34–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**

**[Docket No. FAA–2014–0832; Directorate Identifier 2014–SW–044–AD; Amendment**  **39–17995; AD 2014–21–03]**

**RIN 2120–AA64**

**Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters (Previously Eurocopter**  **France) Helicopters**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

**ACTION :**  Final rule; request for
comments.

**SUMMARY :**  We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Airbus Helicopters Model AS332L2 helicopters with a certain yaw control damper support (support) installed. This AD requires repetitively inspecting the support attachment points for a crack. This AD is prompted by a report that the front attachment points of several supports were found to have cracks. These actions are intended to detect a crack in a support, which could result in failure of the support, separation of the yaw damper unit, blocking of the yaw flight control channel, and reduced control of the helicopter.

**DATES :**  This AD becomes effective November 12, 2014.

We must receive comments on this AD by December 26, 2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may send comments by any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your comments electronically.

• Fax: 202–493–2251.

• Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001.

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.


### 63810 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 207 / Monday, October 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations Office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in the **ADDRESSES** section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus Helicopters, Inc., 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone (972) 641– 0000 or (800) 232–0323; fax (972) 641– 3775; or at http:// www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub. You may review the referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Rao Edupuganti, Aviation Safety Engineer, Regulations and Policy Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817) 222–5110; email rao.edupuganti@faa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Comments Invited

This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety, and we did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to provide your comments prior to it becoming effective. However, we invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that resulted from adopting this AD. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the AD, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should submit them only one time. We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking during the comment period. We will consider all the comments we receive and may conduct additional rulemaking based on those comments. Discussion This AD is prompted by AD No. 2014–0080, dated March 27, 2014, issued by EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, to correct an unsafe condition for Airbus Helicopters Model AS332L2 helicopters with a support part number (P/N) 332A25–1334–00 installed. EASA advises of several reports of cracks on the two front attachment points of the support, and that subsequent investigations determined pilot actions on the yaw pedals could generate detrimental loading conditions on the support attachment points and initiate a crack. EASA also states that a crack could lead to structural failure of the support, detachment of the damper unit, possible blocking of the yaw flight control channel, and reduced control of the helicopter. EASA AD No. 2014–0080 requires repetitive inspections of the support and, if there is a crack, replacing the support.

FAA’s Determination

These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of France and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, its technical representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in the EASA AD. We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of the same type design.

Related Service Information

We reviewed Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin No. AS332–05.00.98, Revision 0, dated March 26, 2014 (ASB), for Model AS332L2 helicopters. This ASB describes procedures for inspecting the support attachment points for a crack and, if there is a crack, requires replacing the support.
AD Requirements

This AD requires, for helicopters with 3,900 or more hours time-in-service (TIS), within 100 hours TIS and at intervals not exceeding 825 hours TIS, repetitively inspecting each support, P/ N 332–A25–1334–00, at its attachment points for a crack. If there is a crack, this AD requires replacing the support before further flight.

Interim Action

We consider this AD to be an interim action. If final action is later identified, we might consider further rulemaking then. Costs of Compliance There are no costs of compliance with this AD because there are no helicopters with this type certificate on the U.S. Registry. FAA’s Justification and Determination of the Effective Date

There are no helicopters with this type certificate on the U.S. Registry. Therefore, we believe it is unlikely that we will receive any adverse comments or useful information about this AD from U.S. Operators.

Since an unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of this AD, we determined that notice and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are unnecessary because there are none of these products on the U.S. Registry. Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings

We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed, I certify that this AD:

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and

4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative,


### 63811 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 207 / Monday, October 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

**PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

**§ 39.13 [Amended]**

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
2014–21–03 Airbus Helicopters (Previously Eurocopter France): Amendment 39– 17995; Docket No. FAA–2014–0832; Directorate Identifier 2014–SW–044–AD.
(a) Applicability

This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters Model AS332L2 helicopters with a yaw control damper support (support) part number 332A25–1334–00 installed, certificated in any category.

(b) Unsafe Condition

This AD defines the unsafe condition as a crack on a support at an attachment point, which could result in failure of the support, separation of the yaw damper unit, blocking of the yaw flight control channel, and reduced control of the helicopter.

(c) Effective Date

This AD becomes effective November 12,
2014. (d) Compliance

You are responsible for performing each action required by this AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been accomplished prior to that time.
(e) Required Actions

For helicopters with 3,900 hours time-inservice (TIS) or more, within 100 hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not exceeding 825 hours TIS, using a light source and a mirror, inspect each support at the four attachment points for a crack. If there is a crack, before further flight, replace the support.
(f) Special Flight Permits

Special flight permits are prohibited.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

(1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to: Rao Edupuganti, Aviation Safety Engineer, Regulations and Policy Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817) 222–5110; email rao.edupuganti@faa.gov.

(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office or certificate holding district office, before operating any aircraft complying with this AD through an AMOC.

(h) Additional Information

(1) Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin No. AS332–05.00.98, Revision 0, dated March 26, 2014, which is not incorporated by reference, contains additional information about the subject of this AD. For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus Helicopters, Inc., 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone (972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–0323; fax (972) 641–3775; or at http:// www.airbushelicopters.com/techpub. You may review a copy of the service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.

(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2014–0080, dated March 27, 2014. You may view the EASA AD on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FAA–2014–0832. (i) Subject

Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6700: Rotorcraft Flight Control.

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 6,
2014. Lance T. Gant, Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–25406 Filed 10–24–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY**

**Internal Revenue Service**

**26 CFR Parts 31 and 301**

**[TD 9699]**

**RIN 1545–BG53**

**Removal of the Qualified Payment Card Agent Program** 

**AGENCY :**  Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

**ACTION :**  Final regulations.

**SUMMARY :**  This document contains final regulations that will remove regulations relating to information reporting and backup withholding for the Qualified Payment Card Agent (QPCA) Program. This document also amends regulations to remove references to the QPCA Program. Enactment of the payment card and third party network reporting requirements in the Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008 made the QPCA Program obsolete. Because no payors have applied to be designated as a QPCA (and no payors have been designated as a QPCA), no taxpayers will be affected by these final regulations.

**DATES :**  These regulations are effective October 27, 2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :** Michael Hara, (202) 317–5413 (not tollfree calls).

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Background

This document amends the Employment Tax Regulations (26 CFR Part 31) and the Procedure and Administration Regulations (26 CFR Part 301) to remove deadwood provisions relating to the now obsolete QPCA Program. On March 24, 2014, a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG– 163195–05) was published in the Federal Register (79 FR 15926) proposing to remove §§ 31.3406(g)–1(f), 301.6724–1(e)(1)(vi)(H), and 301.6724– 1(f)(5)(vii) and amend § 301.6724– 1(c)(6) to remove references to QPCAs. The notice of proposed rulemaking also withdrew proposed regulations published in the Federal Register on July 13, 2007 relating to the QPCA Program (72 FR 38534). No comments were received in response to the proposed regulations.

Section 6041(a) requires persons engaged in a trade or business and making payments in the course of such trade or business to another person of rent, salaries, wages, premiums, annuities, compensations, remunerations, emoluments, or other fixed or determinable gains, profits, and income of $600 or more in any one taxable year to file information returns with the IRS and to furnish information statements to payees. Among other items, the payor must include the payee’s name and taxpayer identification number (TIN) on the information return and the information statement. Section 3406(a)(1) requires a payor to withhold on any reportable payment (as defined in section 3406(b)(1)) if: (1) The payee fails to furnish the payee’s TIN to the payor as required; or (2) the Secretary notifies the payor that the TIN furnished by the payee is incorrect.

The QPCA Program was developed by the IRS to enhance the accuracy of section 6041 information reporting in transactions where a payment card, such as a credit card, is accepted as