alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 0- 0064 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RONALD ALAN HUMMEL,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 1 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 23 2020

11/23/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0064
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code)**

 

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code),the undersigned officer of *SOURCECORP*,Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that:

 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the“Form 10-Q/A”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained inthe Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  March 23, 2005 |    /s/  Ed H. Bowman, Jr. |   |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        | Ed  H. Bowman, Jr.                       |
|                        | President  and Chief Executive Officer   |

 

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).

 

----
(LOGO)
                                  EQUIVANTAGE

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
                                       FOR
                       EQUIVANTAGE HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST
                                     1997-4

The undersigned  Officer  certifies that for the fiscal year ending December 31,
1997, she has reviewed the activities and performance of the Servicer during the
preceding fiscal year under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and
to the best of her  knowledge,  the  Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its duties,
responsibilities or obligations under this Agreement throughout such year.

EQUIVANTAGE INC., Servicer 

Certified By:
/S/Elizabeth Folk
Elizabeth Folk, Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

3/26/98
Date
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 2 1
- 1042

ANA YESSELI PINEDA

- RAMOS , P etitioner ,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General , Respondent

.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.
Submitted : March 31 , 202 2 D ecided: April 26, 2022

Before KING, AGEE, and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges.

Petition granted in part, vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion

.

ON BRIEF: Nash Fayad, FAYAD LAW, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Petitioner

. Brian Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jonathan Robbins, Senior Litigation Counsel, Dana M. Camilleri, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinio ns are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM : Petitioner Ana Yesseli Pineda

- Ramos is a citizen of Honduras who was ordered removed from the United States. F ear ing return to Honduras because members of a gang called Los Ardones had approached her at school , tried to force her to sell drugs, threatened to use her as a prostitute, and twice attempted to kidnap her , Pineda

- Ramos applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT)

. The im migration judge rejected each claim

. The Board of Immigration Appeals agreed, concluding that

— on her asylum and withholding claims

— Pineda

- Ramos had failed to show the required nexus between her proposed particular social group and the harm she feared. T he Board also rejected Pineda

- Ramos’s CAT claim ( wh ich has no nexus requirement, see 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16

– 18 ) because she “never reported the threats or attempted kidnappings to police, as she was afraid of retaliation from gang members she believes are connected to the police.” AR 3. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude the agency’s nexus decision is supported by substantial evidence and the record does not compel a contrary result. See INS v. Elias

- Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). We therefore deny the petition for review on th at issue. We cannot, however, uphold the Board’s decision on Pineda

- Ramos’s CAT claim. Our recent en banc decision in Portillo Flores v. Garland , 3 F.4th 615, 635 , 637 (4th Cir. 2021) , confirmed that the Board may not apply “a per se reporting requirement” to reject
CAT claims

. Because the Board relied only on just such a requirement when rejecting Pineda

- Ramos’s CAT claim, we grant the petition for review on th at issue, vacate the3 Board’s decision, and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion or Portillo Flores

. PETITION GRANTED IN PART ; VACATED AND REMANDED
#### MERRIOTT v. STATE.

No. 26853.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 24, 1954.

E. T. Miller, Amarillo, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is forgery; the punishment, two years.

The injured party, Walter Larson, a farm implement dealer in the City of Plain-view, testified that on January 29 the appellant bought á used Ferguson tractor from him, gave him a check drawn on Levelland National Bank of Levelland, Texas, in payment therefor and signed the name “J. B. Stein” thereto in his presence. The witness testified that the check was later returned to him with the notation that there was no such bank, that almost a month later he recovered the tractor with *956the aid of the officers near Earth, Texas, and that the serial number had been altered.

Mr. Fooshee, Larson’s service manager, corroborated his testimony about the sale to appellant on the day in question.

Mr. Lackey, a farmer near Earth, testified that he noticed the tractor involved in this transaction seemingly abandoned near his field, that he was instructed by the officers to ;be on the lookout, and that sometime later he did see the appellant in a truck in the vicinity of the tractor, and that he gave the officers the license number of the appellant’s truck.

The check was offered in evidence, and it was established that there was no such bank as the one on which it was drawn and that no J. B. Stein was known in the vicinity of Levellartd.

Appellant, testifying in his own behalf, denied that he had executed the check in question or had ever bought a tractor from Mr. Larson. His defense was that of alibi, and he was in a measure supported by some of his witnesses.

The jury resolved the disputed issue against the appellant, and we find the evidence sufficient to support the -conviction.

There are no bills of exception' in the record.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the .trial court is affirmed.-
Order entered April 30 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 01639

- CR

BERNARD WINFIELD SHO RTT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. F07

- 00193

- M



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.

On March 4, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the

reporter’s record had not been filed. On April 28, 2014, we received the reporter’s record.

Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the March 4, 2014 order

requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
# Contents

Data 1

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/nw2_epg0_sso_r33_bcfw.htm

U.S. Energy Information Administration

infoctr@eia.doe.gov

# Data 1

Back to Contents
Order entered September 8 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00777 - CV IN THE ESTATE OF JUD Y DARLENE MORGENROTH , DECEASED

On Appeal from the Collin County Probate

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PB1 - 1 017 - 2011



### O RDER W e GRANT appellant’s September 4, 2015 second motion to extend time to file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than September 15, 2015

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 211 (Tuesday, October 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27884]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: November 14-15, 2000.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Swissotel Washington, The Watergate, 2650 Virginia Ave., 
NW., Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Gerald L McLaughlin, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID, NIH, Room 2217, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7610, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7610, 301-496-2550, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b3d4de828786d2f3dddadb9dd4dcc5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f58520e0b0a5e7f51565711585049">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 18, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-27884 Filed 10-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3353 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3353

 To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to extend 
   the period during which supplemental nutrition assistance program 
                  benefits are temporarily increased.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 28, 2013

   Mr. Conyers (for himself, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Huffman, Mr. 
Ellison, Mr. Cartwright, Ms. Waters, Ms. Clarke, Ms. Shea-Porter, Mrs. 
Napolitano, Mr. Serrano, Ms. Pingree of Maine, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Capuano, 
 Ms. Bordallo, Ms. Kuster, Mr. Takano, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Langevin, Mr. 
  Holt, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Tierney, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. Rangel, Mr. 
Cleaver, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. DeLauro, Ms. Moore, 
 Mr. Honda, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Carson of Indiana, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, 
    Ms. Lofgren, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California, Ms. Fudge, Ms. 
Slaughter, and Mr. McDermott) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to extend 
   the period during which supplemental nutrition assistance program 
                  benefits are temporarily increased.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Extend Not Cut SNAP Benefits Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY INCREASE IN SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION 
              ASSISTANCE BENEFITS.

    Section 101(a) of title I of division A of the American Recovery 
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-5; 123 Stat. 120) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ``section 3(o)'' and 
        inserting ``section 3(u)'', and
            (2) in paragraph (2) by striking ``2013'' and inserting 
        ``2014''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 
September 30, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRCATED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         475,325
<SECURITIES>                                   101,961
<RECEIVABLES>                                  176,475
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     69,542
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               929,884
<PP&E>                                          41,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,089)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,012,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          708,548
<BONDS>                                        389,586
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,462
<OTHER-SE>                                    (96,439)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,012,157
<SALES>                                      2,515,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,515,966
<CGS>                                        1,590,438
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,653,752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (736,793)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,339
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (738,132)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (738,132)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION VII
901 NORTH 5TH STREET KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101

September 23, 2011

Gary Blackstone

3721 Laurel Avenue
Omaha, Nebraska 68111

RE: SAID: 38118

3721 Laurel Avenue
Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Assessment

Dear Owner/Resident:

A Lead Based Paint assessment was recently performed on your property by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as part of the Omaha Lead site investigation. The purpose of this assessment is to determine whether a significant quantity of LBP is present on the exterior surface of structures, where deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc) exist that might increase lead concentrations in the yard above acceptable levels.

Enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 3721 Laurel Avenue. The EPA has developed paint stabilization eligibility criteria that involve measuring the amount of deteriorated LBP on a structure and calculating the concentration of lead in soils around the home that would result if all of the identified deteriorated paint were to fall to the ground and uniformly mix with the soil under certain assumptions. During the LBP assessment, the areal extent of the deteriorated paint observed on structure surfaces was estimated and the lead content in the deteriorated paint was measured using an X-Ray Fluorescence instrument.

The data obtained during the LBP assessment was used to estimate the increase in soil lead concentration that would result if all of the deteriorating paint identified in the assessment were to fall to the ground and mix with surface soil within six feet of the foundation of the structure. For purposes of this calculation, the deteriorating LBP on a structure is assumed to fall onto the ground surface within six feet of the foundation and be uniformly mixed with the top one inch of soil. The estimated lead concentration in the soil potentially caused by the deteriorating LBP provides a measure of the severity of LBP deterioration on individual structures. The EPA uses these criteria to rank properties based on the potential for recontamination of soil to occur. Paint stabilization is being offered at only those households with the most severe LBP problems, particularly where children under the age of seven reside.

The LBP assessment performed by the EPA using the above criteria indicated that your house IS NOT eligible for paint stabilization.If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center at (402) 731-3045.

Sincerely,

Pauletta R. France-Isetts Project Coordinator Environmental Protection Agency

Enclosures
Para información en español, llame al EPA Information Center (402) 731-3045.Omaha Lead Site LBP Assessment

-EGEND: H 

### - N 

### - P 

## - 01 -38118 Samples Analyzed

LEVID Number 

### d

XRF Un~t -7-7057 BOO^ 

### 2.30

Sampie Numtser Lead Loading Structure/Feature Substrate Color Deteriorated

Whdow. sickng porch, etc ) (Wood, concrete etc 1 Area
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Paul K. Laikind, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MetabasisTherapeutics, Inc.;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)             designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including any consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)                                     evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)             disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)             allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)                                     anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date: March 23, 2006 | By:      | /s/ PAUL K. LAIKIND       |
|----------------------|----------|---------------------------|
|                 |     | Paul K. Laikind, Ph.D.,   |
| * *             | * * | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                    1,677        
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,875
<ALLOWANCES>                                    2,076
<INVENTORY>                                       133
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,128 
<PP&E>                                            760
<DEPRECIATION>                                  8,053
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 91,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           7,894
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            3
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   91,883
<SALES>                                        16,152 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,079
<CGS>                                          13,013         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  13,013 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               12,817
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  709
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              3,032
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,262
<INCOME-TAX>                                      867
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,382
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (402) 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      980
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .30 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .28  
        


</TABLE>