alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Jorge Luis Estrella v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 17

- 00162

- CR

Trial court case number: 13

- DCR

- 064879

Trial court: 240th District Court of Fort Bend County

The record is due by April 17, 2017. The reporter’s record was filed on March 7, 2017.

The clerk’s record has not yet been filed. Accordingly, appellant’s brief is not yet due. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a) (appe llant’s brief is due within 30 days after clerk’s record or reporter’s record

is filed, whichever is later).

On March 27, 2017, appellant prematurely filed a motion for extension of time to file his

brief. We grant the motion and extend the deadline for appellant’s brief until 30 days after the

clerk’s record is filed in this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_

/s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 30, 2017
#### WALTERS v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 1, 1953.

Joe S. Feather and Garrett Teague, Jr., Williamsburg, for movant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Whitley Circuit Court by H. E. “Bucky” Walters from a-judgment convicting him of unlaw* *588ful possession of whiskey for the purpose of sale, and fixing his punishment at a fine of $50 and 30 days in jail.

A consideration of the record discloses no error prejudicial to movant’s substantial rights -and the judgment is affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.01 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viseon, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2004 (Report), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: November 12, 2004 /s/ John C. Harris
John C. Harris
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Dated: November 12, 2004 /s/ Robert A. Wolf
Robert A. Wolf
Its Chief Financial Officer 20
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3337 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3337

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize payment of expenses 
 for a stopover of the remains of decedents covered by section 1481 of 
             such title en route to the final destination.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 23, 2013

   Mr. Tonko (for himself, Mr. Gibson, and Mr. Owens) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize payment of expenses 
 for a stopover of the remains of decedents covered by section 1481 of 
             such title en route to the final destination.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``LTC Todd J. Clark Hero Flight Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF PAYMENT OF EXPENSES OF STOPOVER OF REMAINS EN 
              ROUTE TO FINAL DESTINATION.

    Section 1482(a)(8) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``the place selected by the person'' and inserting ``the place 
selected, and one stopover (either by direct or indirect routing) if 
requested, by the person''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                         [Genomic Solutions Letterhead]

                                 April 1, 2002


United States Securities & Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

     Re:  Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X

Dear Sir/Madame:

     Our audited financial statement filed with our Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001 include an accountant's report from Arthur Andersen LLP
issued after March 14, 2002. Arthur Andersen has represented to us in a letter
dated April 1, 2002, that this audit was subject to Arthur Andersen's quality
control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Arthur
Andersen personnel working on the audit, availability of national office
consultation, and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur
Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

                                   Sincerely,
                             GENOMIC SOLUTIONS INC.




                            /s/ Steven J. Richvalsky
               Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President
                                 and Treasurer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 213 (Thursday, November 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 65830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28065]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Arizona Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Arizona Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 9:00 
a.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on November 16, 2000, at the Courtyard by 
Marriott, 9631 North Black Canyon Highway, Phoenix, Arizona 85021. The 
purpose of the community forum is to hold a one day open meeting on 
civil rights issues in law enforcement and education.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Philip Montez, Director of the Western 
Regional Office, 213-894-3437 (TDD 213-894-3435). Hearing-impaired 
persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign 
language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten 
(10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, October 27, 2000.
Lisa M. Kelly,
Special Assistant to the Staff Director, Regional Programs Coordination 
Unit.
[FR Doc. 00-28065 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3472 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3472

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 13127 Broadway Street in Alden, New York, as the ``Sergeant Brett E. 
                   Gornewicz Memorial Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2013

  Mr. Collins of New York (for himself, Mr. Reed, Mr. Owens, and Mr. 
    Hanna) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 13127 Broadway Street in Alden, New York, as the ``Sergeant Brett E. 
                   Gornewicz Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT BRETT E. GORNEWICZ MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 13127 Broadway Street in Alden, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant Brett E. Gornewicz Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Brett E. Gornewicz Memorial Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
#### WERLEY v. STATE.

No. 24558.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 21, 1949.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 25, 1950.

*834Hardin & Little, James E. Little, Edin-burg, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The conviction is for aggravated assault, with a fine of $150.00 and one month in jail.

It is alleged that appellant drove and operated a motor vehicle on a public highway and committed aggravated assault upon the person named by willfully and with negligence colliding with and causing injury to such person. When called into court, appellant pleaded guilty before the court without a jury. There is no statement of facts showing what evidence was had. upon the trial and no bills of exception. The judgment recites that he announced ready for trial and pleaded guilty; that the court admonished him of the consequences of his plea and the judgment was entered accordingly. The judgment also recites that the defendant requested the consent of the court permitting him -to waive trial by jury. It also contains the “sentence”. This was unnecessary in a misdemeanor case, but we cannot say that it would be harmful and no question is raised about it.

The trial and judgment were had on July 18th. Two days thereafter a very lengthy motion for new trial was filed making a large number of complaints which appellant contends constitute fundamental error. In reply to this the State filed its contest in due form, expressly denying in specific terms each and every allegation made in the motion. Evidence was heard and a rather lengthy statement of facts, taken only on the motion for new trial, is found in the record. There is at least evidence to support the judgment of the court in finding against each and every contention which appellant presented. This finding is, under the statement of facts as we view it, conclusive. We have no power to say that the judge decided against the weight of the evidence, any more than we would have to say that a jury found against the most reasonable evidence of a case and in favor of that which was weaker.

The foregoing summary of the record clearly states the case from our viewpoint and leaves nothing further for our discussion. It is not necessary to discuss what the law is under a state of facts which the court has impliedly, by his judgment on a motion for new trial, found to be incorrect. The very able brief will not, under the circumstances, aid us.

We find no1 error in the record and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20D0146. ADRIAN BERNARD PAYTON v. THE STATE. 

It appears that in 2013, Adrian Bernard Payton pled guilty to armed robbery

and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. It also appears that in

February 2019, Payton filed a “motion to correct void and illegal sentence,” alleging

that his arrest warrant affidavit was deficient. The trial court denied the motion on

August 27, 2019. On October 25, 2019, Payton filed this application for discretionary

review of the trial court’s order. We lack jurisdiction for two reasons.

First, Payton’s application is untimely.To be timely, a discretionary application

must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d);

Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582, 583 (420 SE2d 393) (1992). This statutory deadline

is jurisdictional, and we cannot accept an application for appeal not made in

compliance therewith. Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989).

Payton filed this application 59 days after entry of the order he seeks to appeal. The

application is therefore untimely. 

Second, an appeal may lie from an order denying or dismissing a motion to

correct a void sentence if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is,

in fact, void, but Payton has not raised such a claim. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga.

216, 217 n. 1 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676

SE2d 465) (2009). “Motionsto vacate a void sentence generally are limited to claims

that – even assuming the existence and validity of the conviction for which the

sentence was imposed – the law does not authorize that sentence, most typically

because it exceedsthe mostsevere punishment for which the applicable penalstatute

provides.” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). Payton

November 20, 2019
does not contend that his sentence exceeded the statutory range of punishment;

instead, his challenge to his arrest warrant constitutes a challenge to the validity of

his conviction. A motion to vacate a judgment of conviction – which, in substance,

is what Payton filed here – “is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal case,” and any

appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a motion must be dismissed. See

Harper, 286 Ga. at 218 (1); see also Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d

150) (2010). A challenge to a criminal conviction “may be considered only in a

traditionally recognized proceeding to challenge a criminal conviction,” including a

petition for habeas corpus. See Nazario v. State, 293 Ga. 480, 488 (2) (d) (746 SE2d

109) (2013); see also OCGA § 9-14-40 et seq. 

Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/20/2019
Exhibit 31.2





Certification








I, Karen J. Willem, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K/A of iPass Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








April 29, 2015/s/ Karen J. WillemKaren J. WillemSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR
. R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shedan d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR
. R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 60737 Su m m ar y Cal endar

EVI N J OSU E M ARQ U EZ- CASTI LLO P et i t i on er

v. ERI C H H OLD ER, J R, U S ATTORN EY GE N ERA L Res po nde nt

Pet i t i o n f

o rRev i e w o f

a n Ord e ro f

t he B o a r do f Im m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls B IAN o. A 200 122 168

B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H AM , B A R K S D A L E , an d E L R O D , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * Evi n J o s ue M ar que z - Cas t i l l o , a nat ivea nd c i t i z e n o f H o ndur as , pe t i t i o ns t hi s c o ur tf

o rr e vi e w o f

t he Boa r d o f

I m m i gr at i o n Appe al s ’a f f i r m anc e o f

t he im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’ s d e n ia l o f h is re q u e s t fo ra s ylu m a n dw ith h o ld in go f r e m o v a l. M arqu ez ha s al so r equ est ed a st ay of rem oval pen di n g t h i s c ou rt ’ s c on si derati on
o f h i s p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I LE D May 15, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 60737

S ee C h en v. G on zales , 4 7 0 F .3 d1 1 3 1 , 1 1 3 5 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ); E dua r d v. 1 A sh cr oft , 3 7 9 F .3 d1 8 2 , 1 8 8 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ). S ee Ch en , 470 F. 3d at1135. 2 S eeEfe v

. A sh cr oft , 2 9 3 F .3d8 9 9 , 9 0 6 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 2 ). 3 2 M ar quez ar gues t hath e i s ent i t l ed t o a sy l um and w i t hhol di ng of r em oval becau se he is a m em ber of a soc i algroup , i

. e. , you n g peop l e w h o ref u se t o pi ck si des betw een or j oi n rival gan gs i n H on du ras. H e f u rt h er argues t h at he ha s a
w e ll-fo u n d e dfe a ro f p e r s e c u tio n b e c a u s e th e g a n g s th r e a te n e d h im b a s e do n h is

r e fu s a l to ch o o s e s id e s inth e g a n gco n flic t. A s t o M arqu ez’ s asyl u m cl ai m , becau se harassm en tan d th reat s do not qua l i f y as pe r s e c u t i on a n d be c aus e M ar que z ha s no ts ho w n t hata ny o f t he gan gs’a ct i on s am ou n t ed to persecuti on , he h as not show n t h at he w as subjec t t o pe r s e c ut i o n. As ar e s ul t , M ar que z a l s o ha s no t s ho w n t hat hi s fe ar o f b e i ng 1 be at e n o rkil l e d o n hi s r e t ur n t o H o ndur as w as o bj e c t ive l y r e as o nab l e , and thus he ha s no te s t ab l i s he d aw e l l

- f o unde d f

e aro f f ut ur e pe r s e c ut i o n. 2 A s t o M arq u ez ’ s w i t hhol di ng of r em ovalr eques t , be c ause M ar quez has fai l ed t o pr ovet hathe w as ent i t l ed t o a sy l um , a f or t i or ihe has nots how n t hat h e m ee ts th e m ore stri n ge n t st a n d a rdf or p rov i n g th a t he i s en titl edto
w ith h o ld in go f r e m o v a l. 3 M ar quez’ s peti t i on f orr evi ew i s D E N I E D , a n d hi s m ot i on f ora s t ay p en d i n g th i s cou rt’ s con sider a ti on of h i s p eti ti on f or rev i ew is D E N IE D a s m oo t.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, J. PatrickSpainhour, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form10-K/A of the ServiceMaster Company; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.

 

Date: March 30, 2007 

 
|        |   | /s/ J. Patrick Spainhour             |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |   | J. Patrick Spainhour                 |
|   |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27523]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COMMISSION ON LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Place

Friday, November 15, 2000--9-4:30 p.m.
Marriott Residence Inn (Washington/Jefferson Room), 1199 Vermont 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC

Matters To Be Discussed

9-11 a.m.
    Welcome and introduction of new members
    Adminstration matters
    Committee/program reports
11-4:15 p.m.
    Discussion and reports on the ``Assessment of Federal Government 
Information and the Future of the National Technical Information 
Service (NTIS)''

    To request further information or to make special arrangements for 
persons with disabilities, contact Barbara Whiteleather (telephone: 
202-606-9200; fax: 202-606-9203; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85e7f2edecf1e0e9e0e4f1ede0f7c5ebe6e9ecf6abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="690b1e01001d0c050c081d010c1b29070a05001a470e061f">[email protected]</span></a>) no 
later than one week in advance of the meeting.

    Dated: October 17, 2000.
Robert S. Willard,
NCLIS Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 00-27523 Filed 10-23-00; 11:22 am]
BILLING CODE 7527-$$-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 210 (Monday, October 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64696-64697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27779]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER00-2964-000 and ER00-2964-003]


West Georgia Generating Company L.P.; Notice of Filing

October 25, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 18, 2000, West Georgia Generating 
Company (West Georgia), an Exempt Wholesale Generator that owns and 
operates a 640 MW electric generation plant in Thomastown, Georgia, 
tendered for filing a Power Purchase Agreement between West Georgia 
Generating Company L.P. and Oglethorpe Power Corporation (the 
Agreement). The purpose of the filing was to provide corrected 
designations under Order No. 614, FERC Stats. and Regs. para.31,096 
(2000), as required by the letter order issued in these dockets on 
September 21, 2000.
    West Georgia requests that the Agreement be permitted to become 
effective June 6, 2000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
and protests should be filed on or November 8, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the

[[Page 64697]]

appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may 
also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Beginning November 1, 
2000, comments and protests may be filed electronically via the 
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27779 Filed 10-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Motion Granted; Order filed April 25, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00241-CV

____________

WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant

V.

TEXAS FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, A/S/O 

ALBERT H. WATTS, JR., Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-27195

ORDER

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying appellant’s 

motion to compel arbitration signed February 20, 2013. See Tex. Civ. 

Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 51.016, 171.098. On April 10, 2013, appellant 

filed a motion to stay trial court proceedings pending resolution of this 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 29.3. 
2

On April 19, 2013, appellee filed a response to the motion stating 

that it is unopposed to the requested relief.

We therefore GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER all 

proceedings in the trial court STAYED until a final decision by this 

court on this interlocutory appeal, or until further order of this court. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Frost and Donovan.