alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dorothy HAGAN, Appellant, v. The CITY OF OWENSBORO, Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 8, 1954.

*905E. B. Anderson and John B. Anderson, Owensboro, for appellant.

George S. Wilson, Jr., William L. Wilson and Joseph H. McKinley, Owens-boro, for appellee.

COMBS, Justice.

A garbage truck owned by the City of Owensboro, driven by a City employee, collided with another vehicle and then struck the plaintiff, Dorothy Hagan. Plaintiff’s action against the City for personal injuries was dismissed on 'the ground that the driver of the truck at the time of the accident was engaged in a governmental function.

Plaintiff concedes that a municipality is not liable in damages for the acts of its agents engaged in a governmental function. It is also conceded that the driver of this truck, while in the actual performance of his duties in collecting garbage, was engaged in a governmental function. But plaintiff contends that at the time of the accident in which she was injured the driver of the truck was engaged in a ministerial or corporate function, as distinguished from a governmental function.

The facts are not m dispute. The driver of the truck, one Barnes, had a helper by the name of Riley. On the morning of the accident Barnes and Riley performed their usual duties of collecting garbage for the City. At noon, Barnes used the garbage truck to drive Riley to his home for lunch. He then drove the truck to his own home ■ and ate lunch. • Both Barnes and Riley lived within the City. After eating his lunch, Barnes returned with the truck to Riley’s home to take Riley 'back to work. Riley was not feeling well and decided not to return to work that afternoon. Barnes 'was' en route from the Riley home to' his place of work when the accident occurred.

It is the general rule, of, course, that a municipality is not liable in damages for the torts of its agents while they are engaged, in the performance of a governmental function. It is equally as well settled that when a municipality embarks on an enterprise not falling within the scope of its governmental functions it is responsible in damages for the negligence of its agents and employees to the same extent as would be an individual. City of Bowling Green v. Bandy, 208 Ky. 259, 270 S.W. 837, and cases cited in that opinion. Annotation 156 A.L.R. 702.

It seems to us that Barnes, in driving his helper to his home for lunch and returning for him, under the circumstances here shown, was performing a governmental function. There was a direct and causatiye connection between driving the helper to lunch and the collection of the City garbage. Barnes’ acts were calculated to expedite collection of the garbage which was a governmental function he was employed to perform. The cases cited by plaintiff in support of 'her contention are not in point.

The'judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64221-64222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27654]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

CANCELLATION OF PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED MEETING: Tuesday, October 17, 
2000. Meeting closed to the public.
* * * * *

DATE & TIME: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.


DATE & TIME: Thursday, November 2, 2000 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

[[Page 64222]]


STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2000-24; Alaska Democratic Party by counsel, 
Neil Reiff.
    Statements of Reasons--Requests to Deny Certification of Public 
Funds to Patrick J. Buchanan and Ezola Foster (LRA#598/599).
    Notice of Disposition of Petition for Rulemaking Filed by the 
Project on Government Oversight.
    Administrative Matters.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-27654 Filed 10-24-00; 11:49 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
#### Mattie Bell McCULLOUGH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27105.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 27, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Ewing Werlein, Dist. Atty., King C. Haynie, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, lor the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment, 90 days in jail and a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or 'bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    22,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (501)
<INVENTORY>                                      90,019
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                120,613
<PP&E>                                           48,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (28,562)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  178,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            62,266
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          9,670
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    178,081
<SALES>                                         253,350
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                253,350
<CGS>                                           183,403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   183,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 51,996
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    108
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4,612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  15,542
<INCOME-TAX>                                      6,225
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               9,317
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      9,317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.96
        


</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3011 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to require any person 

subject to accounting principles or standards under the securities laws 

to show all transactions of such person on the balance sheet of such 

person. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2013 

Mr. CAPUANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to require 

any person subject to accounting principles or standards 

under the securities laws to show all transactions of 

such person on the balance sheet of such person. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nothing Off Balance 

5 Sheet Act of 2013’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3011 IH

1 SEC. 2. ALL TRANSACTIONS REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN ON 

2 BALANCE SHEET. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—In establishing accounting prin4 ciples or standards for purposes of the securities laws (as 

5 defined in section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 

6 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a))), the Securities and Exchange 

7 Commission shall require any person subject to such prin8 ciples or standards to show all transactions of such person 

9 on the balance sheet of such person. 

10 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Securities and Exchange 

11 Commission shall promulgate regulations to implement 

12 subsection (a) not later than the date that is 90 days after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3296 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3296

  To authorize the United States Department of Treasury to prioritize 
     certain payments in the event that the debt limit is reached.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 16, 2013

 Mr. Gallego introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the United States Department of Treasury to prioritize 
     certain payments in the event that the debt limit is reached.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pay America First Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO PROTECT AMERICA'S SENIORS, VETERANS, AND OTHER 
              DOMESTIC PAYMENTS PRIOR TO DEBT OBLIGATIONS TO FOREIGN 
              BONDHOLDERS.

    This Act shall take effect if the United States Government defaults 
on its legal obligations for the first time in its history, as 
evidenced by the Secretary of the Treasury taking any of the following 
actions:
    (1) Withhold from making payments of debt obligations to foreign 
bond holders, including those in China, Iran, and the Cayman Islands, 
before making payments of debt obligations to programs as listed below:
            (a) Make a payment of a debt obligation to the Social 
        Security and Medicare trust funds or redeem a debt obligation 
        held by those trust funds.
            (b) Redeem a debt obligation held by a trust fund providing 
        veterans benefits, including the Veterans Special Life 
        Insurance Fund, the Veterans Reopened Insurance Fund, the Armed 
        Forces Retirement Home Fund, and the Court of Veteran Appeals 
        Retirement Fund.
            (c) Redeem a debt obligation held by an intragovernmental 
        fund with the purpose of assisting Americans during a natural 
        disaster, including reserves for the National Flood Insurance 
        Program and other disaster relief funds appropriated to the 
        President.
            (d) Make a payment of debt obligations to the Department of 
        Defense, including civilian and uniformed personnel (Army, 
        Navy, Marines, Air Force), military active pay and military 
        retirement benefits, and military benefits to their families.

SEC. 3. REPORT ON CERTAIN ACTIONS.

    (1) In general, after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Treasury exercises his or her authority under subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall thereafter submit a report each week to 
Congress on the payments issued and amount of revenues incoming and 
remaining reserves for upcoming payments issued.
                                 <all>
```
#### CURVIN v. STATE.

No. 22848.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 10, 1944.

G. Q. Youngblood, of Dallas, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The offense is an assault with intent to murder. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of eight years.

The record is before this court without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment and all matters of procedure appear to be regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Summary of Compensation for Named Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.1(c) 
 Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended November 30, 2005 
 SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
  

				
	 Name and Principal Position
	  	2006 Salary
	 Paul B. Toms, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	288,768
		
	 Douglas C. Williams, President and Chief Operating Officer
	  	 	279,456
		
	 E. Larry Ryder, Executive Vice President – Finance and Administration
	  	 	232,872
		
	 Michael P. Spece, Executive Vice President – Merchandising and Design
	  	 	232,872
		
	 C. Scott Young, President and Chief Executive Officer – Bradington-Young, LLC
	  	 	251,505

 For fiscal year 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Hooker Furniture Corporation
approved the bonus potential for each executive officer of the Company and the specific performance goal under the Company’s annual bonus program. Each executive officer’s bonus potential for fiscal 2006 will be equal to a specified
percentage of the amount by which the Company’s pre-tax earnings for fiscal 2006 exceed a specified threshold amount.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27457]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Notice of Meeting of the Industry Sector Advisory Committee on 
Small and Minority Business (ISAC-14)

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Industry Sector Advisory Committee on Small and Minority 
business (ISAC-14) will hold an open meeting on November 13, 2000 from 
9:15 a.m. to 3 p.m.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for November 13, 2000, unless otherwise 
notified

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Department of Commerce, Room 
4830, located at 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC, unless otherwise notified.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Millie Sjoberg, Department of 
Commerce, 14th St. and Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230, 
(202) 482-4792 or Dominic Bianchi, Office of the United States Trade 
Representative, 600 17th St., NW., Washington, DC 20508, (202) 395-
6120.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ISAC-14 will hold an open meeting on 
November 13, 2000 from 9:15 a.m. to 3 p.m. Agenda topics to be 
addressed will be:
    1. A briefing on issues regarding infrastructure security;
    2. A briefing on new Carousel Legislation;
    3. A briefing on the Export Finance Matchmaker program;
    4. A briefing on E-Commerce as it relates to the Free Trade 
Agreement of the Americas; and
    5. Committee business.

Dominic Bianchi,
Acting Assistant United States Trade Representative for 
Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-27457 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
--------------------------------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-44173 of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch Preferred Capital Trust
IV, Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P., Merrill Lynch Preferred Capital
Trust V and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. and Registration Statement
No. 333-59997 of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch Preferred Capital
Trust V and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. on Forms S-3 of our reports
dated March 25, 2008, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merrill
Lynch Preferred Capital Trust V and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. for
the year ended December 28,2007.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


New York, New York
March 25, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3328 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3328

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an extension of 
      the work opportunity tax credit for certain targeted groups.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 23, 2013

Ms. Kelly of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an extension of 
      the work opportunity tax credit for certain targeted groups.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WORK OPPORTUNITY TAX CREDIT FOR CERTAIN 
              TARGETED GROUPS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (B) of section 51(c)(4) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``(December 31, 
2018, in the case of any member of a targeted group described in 
subparagraph (C), (E), (F), or (G) of subsection (d)(1))'' before the 
period at the end.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to individuals who begin work for the employer after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 07-11-0116-CR 

NO. 07-11-0117-CR 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL A 

APRIL 13, 2011 

______________________________ 

JUAN FRANCISCO PACHECO, APPELLANT 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

_________________________________ 

FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; 

NOS. 61,408-B & 62,495-B; HONORABLE JOHN B. BOARD, JUDGE 

_______________________________ 

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 Pending before this Court are Appellant's Motions to Withdraw Appeals in which 

he represents that he no longer wishes to pursue these appeals. The motions are 

signed by Appellant's attorney. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). Appellant did not, however, 

sign the motions as required by Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. Rather, Appellant's signature is affixed to documents entitled Appellant's 

Consent to Motion to Withdraw Appeals in which he confirms that he wishes to withdraw 
2 

these appeals. Therefore, we suspend the operation of that portion of Rule 42.2(a) 

insofar as it requires that Appellant's signature be affixed to the Motions to Withdraw 

Appeals and accept Appellant's signature on his Consent to Withdraw Appeals as 

satisfying the requirements of Rule 42.2(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 2. No decision of this 

Court having been delivered, the motions are granted and the appeals are dismissed. 

No motions for rehearing will be entertained and our mandates will issue forthwith. 

 Patrick A. Pirtle 

 Justice 

Do not publish.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER**6~** FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 May20,2014
MEMORANDUM SUBJECT:

FROM:
TO: Public Comment Submission for Docket ID No. 

### EPA-R04·0AR-2013·0272; Entitled "Comments onEPA's Proposed Approval ofJefferson County SIP Revisions Addressing Emissions During Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Events" Adam Diltsfij Office ofAir, Pesticides and Toxics Legal Support File and Docket EPA-R04-0AR-2013-0272 

## .. ( ' 

# .

The EPA notes that the above-referenced public commentreceivedbythe Agency 

### inconnection withDocket ID No. EPA-R04-0AR-2013-0272 was labeled "confidential draft" and included redlined additions and strikeouts to the text. The commentwas also submitted as an unlocked MicrosoftWord document. Due to the apparent draft nature ofthe submittal, the EPA was concerned that comment mayhave been submitted in error. The EPA contacted the Kentucky Environmental Foundation- the submittal's lead signatoryorganization- and confirmed with the organization's Executive Directorthat the submittal was intended for inclusion in the public record. Based upon that confirmation, the subject submittal is included, as received, in the docket for this rulemaking. 

### See Docket ID No. 

### EPA-R04-0AR-2013·0272.

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper(Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
#### SMITH v. STATE.

No. 23126.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 16, 1945.

W. E. Pinkston, of Dallas, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Automobile theft is the offense; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

■ Appellant was employed by the Dallas Packard Company as a porter and wash-rack boy. The morning of June 2, 1944, without the knowledge or consent of any person, he drove from the place of business an automobile belonging to the company. About 5:30 o’clock that afternoon while joy-riding with his sweetheart, he had a collision with or ran the automobile into a switch engine. The automobile was not sufficiently damaged to prevent further driving. Some two hours after the collision the automobile w;as found by policemen where it had been abandoned some five or six miles from the business district of the city of Dallas.

The sufficiency of these facts to support the conviction is challenged by appellant. This is the sole question presented for review. It is insisted that such facts show a temporary taking only, which was the defensive theory as shown by appellant’s, testimony.

In cases of this character, the fraudulent intent with which the property *573is taken is an essential element. It was the province of the jury to determine from the facts and circumstances the existence of that intent. We would not be authorized to say, as a matter of law, that the facts here presented did not warrant the jury’s conclusion, especially in view of the pertinent instruction upon the defensive theory of a temporary taking. Emanuel v. State, 112 Tex.Cr.R. 412, 16 S.W.2d 1083.

The facts are deemed sufficient to support the conviction, and the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.