alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2 CFO CertificationI, Richard Bjorkman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Sutura, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 20, 2006   /s/ Richard Bjorkman    Richard Bjorkman  Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ANCHOR GLASS CONTAINER CORPORATION INCLUDED IN FORM 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-05-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                     1,060
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,940
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,025
<INVENTORY>                                    120,123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,205
<PP&E>                                         368,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 614,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          168,667
<BONDS>                                        152,758
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           55,983
<PREFERRED>                                         34
<COMMON>                                           139
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,901
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   614,730
<SALES>                                        569,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               569,441
<CGS>                                          523,709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  523,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   375
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (271)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (271)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (11,200)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,471)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (7.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (7.11)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apollo Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,  R.
David  Russell,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  do  hereby  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 13, 2004

                                        /s/  R. David Russell
                                        -------------------------
                                        R. DAVID RUSSELL
                                        CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


<PAGE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7180

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL R. JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-125, CA-96-1029)

Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 29, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael R. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael R. Jackson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Jackson, Nos. CR-93-125;

CA-96-1029 (E.D. Va. July 2, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
July 09, 2013 

<!rnngrens nf tije Nnite!t §fates 

1Wluzl1ingtmt, :mar 20515 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary 

United States Depatiment of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590-0001 

Dear Secretm·y Foxx: 

.· .. :_ .. , 

We are writing today in support of Cape Air's Essential Air Service (EAS) proposal (DOT-OST20 120211681) to continue to provide services fl·om Rutland-Southern Vermont Regional Airpmi 

to Boston, Massachusetts and to add an additional daily service to and from White Plains, New 

York. 

I 

Cape Air has a history of providing exceptional, affordable service to Rutland-Southern Vermont 

Regional Airport. The company's daily services to and from Boston have increased 

enplanernents in Rutland by more than two and a half times since it opened commercial services 

at that airpoti in 2007. The service has allowed for easier access, greater interstate commerce, 

and increased tourism between these two destinations. These services are an impmiant economic 

development tool in the Rutland region and throughout southern Vermont. 

Equally impmtant to the health of the Rutland-area economy is easy access to New York City. 

Southern Vermont's globally-recognized firms- from Orvis to General Electric- need better 

alternatives to reaching New York City. And our tourism industry depends heavily on visitors 

from the New York City area. We believe Cape Air's proposal to expand service to White Plains, 

New York would provide Vermonters with a much-needed transportation alternative and provide 

for significant economic growth in the region. 

EAS was designed to support isolated communities serviced by certified air caniers with a 

guaranteed level of scheduled air service. Cape Air, in partnership with Rutland-Southern 

Vermont Regional Airport, continues to succeed in this goal, with exponential economic benefit 

to the region. 

Thank you for your consideration of this important proposal. Please feel free to contact us if you 

have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

~~,!_?~4~ PATRICK LEAHY 

United States Senator 

BERNARD SANDERS 

United States Senator 

PRINTED DN RECYCLED PAPER 

PETER WELCH 

United States Representative
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-26-1997
<CASH>                                           10000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   10000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         10000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     10000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 65329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28028]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-03980]


Morton Forest Products a.k.a. Tree Source, Morton, Washington; 
Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration

    On August 18, 2000, the Department issued a Negative Determination 
Regarding Eligibility to apply for NAFTA-TAA, applicable to workers and 
former workers of Morton Forest Products, a.k.a. Tree Source, located 
in Morton, Washington. The notice was published in the Federal Register 
on September 12, 2000 (65 FR 55050).
    By letter of September 20, 2000, the company requested 
administrative reconsideration regarding the Department's denial of 
NAFTA-TAA for workers of the subject firm. Workers at Morton Forest 
Products, located in Morton, Washington, were engaged in the 
manufacture of stud lumber. The company claimed that the Department did 
not survey sufficient customers and provided a list of additional 
customers of stud lumber.
    The initial determination was based on customer surveys which 
indicated that imports did not contribute importantly to the worker 
separations at Morton Forest Products. On reconsideration, the 
Department surveyed additional customers. The results of the additional 
customer survey revealed that two major customers of the subject firm 
increased their reliance on purchases of imported stud lumber from 
Canada while reducing purchases of domestically manufactured stud 
lumber.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the additional facts obtained on 
reconsideration, I conclude that there were increased imports from 
Canada of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by 
the subject firm. In accordance with the provisions of the Trade Act, I 
make the following certification:

    All workers of Morton Forest Products, a.k.a. Tree Source, 
located in Morton, Washington engaged in employment related to the 
production of stud lumber who became totally or partially separated 
from employment on or after June 16, 1999 through two years from the 
issuance of this revised determination are eligible to apply for 
NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 19th day of October 2000.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-28028 Filed 10-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### BROWN v. STATE.

No. 24240.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 26, 1949.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for burglary with a charge of repetition of offenses and a sentence in the penitentiary for life.

The statement of facts in the case is not approved by the trial judge. It is not even agreed to by the State’s attorney or by the defense attorney. Consequently, it is not in position to be considered by this Court.

A statement of facts on a motion for new trial appears in the record and, while it is signed by the trial judge, it is not a narrative statement as required by law. The judge has certified that it is necessary to have it in question and answer form. We have frequently held, and repeatedly in recent months, that the trial judge has no such power. The statute does give him the right to make such certificate regarding bills of exception. If the attorneys or the judge had taken the trouble to look at the plain provisions of the statute this would likely not have come to the Court in its present shape. We are not authorized to consider it, under the statutory provision.

Bill of Exception No. 1 attempts to bring a complaint which we are unable to appraise in the absence of a statement of facts. Furthermore, the court’s qualification of the bill, which was accepted by appellant, removes any apparent error.

Bill of Exception No. 2, as qualified by the court, shows no e^ror.

We are unable to consider the complaint in Bill of Exception No. 3 in the absence of statement of facts.

Bill of Exception No. 4, in several respects, falls short of meeting the requirements of law in the preparation of bills of exception.

Bill of Exception No. 5 is in question and answer form and does not contain *988a certificate of the judge authorizing its consideration. In fact, said bill does not show to have been either approved or rejected by the court, if it could in other respects be considered a bill of exception. The same is true of each and every bill in the record.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
### Page 11

October 2 9 2015 

### Docket Operations, M

- 

### 30 U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Room W 12-140, West Building Ground Floor Washington, DC 20590-0001

Dear Sir or Madam: Attached please find Above All Aerial & Specialty Photography - Ohio's (Above All - Ohio) request, as a member of the Professional Aerial Photographers Association, International (PAPA), for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations to allow commercial operation of its Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems ("sUAS") for aerial imaging to include video and still photography. This exemption request is initially for the use of the Inspire 1 sUAS manufactured by DJI, an established sUAS company and in accordance with the sUAS training and certification program as administered by PAPA. Also attached to this letter is the equipment "Above All Aerial & Specialty Photography - Ohio Flight Manual" (Manual), which outlines the operating requirements, limitations, and technical specifications for the DJI Systems as used by Above All - Ohio. Above All - Ohio has reviewed this Manual and has found it to be acceptable for sUAS operations. Applicant submits this manual as a Confidential document under 14 CFR 11.35 (b) as the entire Manual contains proprietary information that the applicant has not and will not share with others. The Manual 

### contains operating conditions and procedures that are not available to the public and are protected from release under the Freedom of Information Act 5 USC 552 et. seq. Thank you for your time and consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions.



### Sincere y,

—~

Kristina M. Holthouse Above All Aerial & Specialty Photography - Ohio Corporate Officer



### Professional Aerial Photographers Association-International Section 333 Doc 15-018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              14,724
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               2,225
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                         0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        192,164
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                     0
<LOANS>                                            498,988
<ALLOWANCE>                                          6,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     736,883
<DEPOSITS>                                         398,965
<SHORT-TERM>                                       257,537
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  8,853
<LONG-TERM>                                         28,513
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                74
<OTHER-SE>                                          42,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                     736,883
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                     21,014
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    6,355
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                       372
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                    27,741
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   7,452
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15,584
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                               12,157
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        (348)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (1,763)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      8,242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      6,377
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4,096
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        8.01
<LOANS-NON>                                          2,559
<LOANS-PAST>                                             0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     6,675
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                          245
<RECOVERIES>                                            45
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 6,675
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0


</TABLE>