alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SLATER v. STATE.

No. 24663.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1950.

None on appeal, for appellant.'

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense, is assault with intent to rape; the punishment, 99 years in ’ the penitentiary.

No bills of exception accompany the record.

The prosecutrix, testified to a very aggravated case of assault with intent, to •rape, and positively identified the appellant as the perpetrator.

The jury in accepting her testimony was warranted in inflicting the penalty assessed.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          241206
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                252431
<PP&E>                                          679006
<DEPRECIATION>                                   37167
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  909233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            29320
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                          2880
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      367882
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    909233
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                258988
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    12902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               34175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 133086
<INCOME-TAX>                                     20496
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             112590
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    112590
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
1 LEV I N

, N A NCY

F r o m: S t e ck e l

, A n d r ew

S e n t: M o n d a y

, F e b r u a r y 0 8

, 20 1 6 4 : 5 7 PM

T o: R e y e s R o m e r o ; m on i c a s o u c i e r @ c o. i m pe r i a l

. c a

. us

C c: L E V IN, N A NC Y ; b r adp o i r i e z @ c o. i m pe r i a l

. c a

. u s; Z i m p f e r

, A m y ; D r a k e, K e r ry

S u b jec t: E P A C o m m e n t s on I m pe r i a l R u l e 2 1 7, F i n a l D r a ft D a te d F eb r ua r y 9

, 20 16

R e y e s & Moni c a

– T han k y ou f o r t he oppo r t uni t y t o r e v i e w I C AP CD ’ s d r a ft C A F r ule sc heduled f o r

boa r d hea r ing t o m o rr o w

. W e app r e c iate y ou r e f f o r t s t o in co r po r a t e ou r input. A f e w la s t c o m men t s

f o l l o w :

1

. O n page 1 1

, T ab l e C

. H ou s ing, #1

. P lea s e chan g e “ o r” t o “ and

, ” t o r equi r e bo t h ( a ) and ( b )

, a s

t he s chedu le f o r ( a ) s eem s mo r e p r o t e c ti v e t han t he s chedu le f o r ( b )

. 2

. O n page 12

, T ab l e D S olid Manu r e / S epa r a t ed S ol i d s

. R emo v e ( c )

, a s t hi s i s al r ead y c o v e r ed in

( a ) and ( c ) doe s no t i n c lude an analogou s s chedu le.

3. O n page 4

, dele t e de f i ni ti on f o r Medium D i a r y C AF (B

. 28 ) a s t hi s de fi ni ti on i s no l onge r

r ele v an t and c on fli c t s w ith info r ma ti on in t he t able abo v e it. A l s o r emo v e o t he r r e f e r en c es f o r

med i u m dai r y C AF on page 1 3 and page 15 ( T able D )

. 4

. O n page 8

, se c ti on C

. 3

. a : A dd a r equi r e m en t f o r a s igned, w r itten c op y o f t hi s de t e r mina t i o n

s hall be r e t ained on

- s ite and made a v ailable f o r in s pe c t i on upon r eque s t.

A nd y S t e c ke l

R ule s O f fi c e C hie f

( 415 ) 9 4 7

- 411 5
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANTHONY LATERZA,

Appellant,

v.

HARRY WINDERMAN,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-783

[December 16, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Glenn D. Kelley, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502018CA011917XXXMB.

Anthony Laterza, North Palm Beach, pro se.

Harry Winderman, Boca Raton, pro se.

GERBER, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the circuit court’s final judgment in the 

defendant’s favor, but more specifically from two orders leading to the final 

judgment.

We affirm without further discussion the circuit court’s order granting 

the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s thenpending causes of action against the defendant, which causes of actions 

we deem as having been disposed with prejudice.

However, we reverse in part the circuit court’s order summarily denying 

the plaintiff’s motion for rehearing, to the extent the plaintiff requested 

leave to amend his complaint to plead an alternative cause of action 

against the defendant for unjust enrichment. See, e.g., Hart Props., Inc. v. 

Slack, 159 So. 2d 236, 240 (Fla. 1963) (“In circumstances such as this 

where a summary judgment should be entered, yet the matters presented 

indicate that the unsuccessful party may have a cause of action or defense 

not pleaded, or a better one than that pleaded, the proper procedure is to 

enter the summary judgment with leave to the party to amend ....”).
2

Based on the foregoing, we remand for the circuit court to vacate its 

final judgment and enter an order granting the plaintiff leave to file a fourth 

amended complaint which shall be limited to pleading a cause of action 

against the defendant for unjust enrichment. In so holding, we do not 

suggest that the plaintiff has a viable cause of action for unjust 

enrichment, only that he be given the opportunity to plead such a claim.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3500 

To provide for the compensation of Federal contractor employees that were 

placed on unpaid leave as a result of the Federal Government shutdown, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2013 

Ms. NORTON (for herself, Ms. MOORE, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, 

Mr. RANGEL, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. ELLISON, Ms. FUDGE, Mr. 

CONYERS, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. JACKSON LEE, and Ms. SCHAKOWSKY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for the compensation of Federal contractor employees that were placed on unpaid leave as a result 

of the Federal Government shutdown, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Low-Wage Federal 

5 Contractor Employee Back Pay Act of 2013’’. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3500 IH

1 SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FURLOUGHED FEDERAL CON2 TRACTOR EMPLOYEES. 

3 Division A of the Continuing Appropriations Act, 

4 2014 (Public Law 113–46) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following new section: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 158. If a Federal contractor that provides re7 tail, food, custodial, and security services to the Federal 

8 Government places the employees of such contractor on 

9 unpaid leave as a result of any lapse in appropriations 

10 which begins on or about October 1, 2013, the Govern11 ment shall provide compensation to such employees at 

12 their standard rate of compensation for the period of such 

13 lapse.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 5, 2014

N o. 04

- 1 3

- 00818

- CR

Mark Anthony GARCIA

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR2731A

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The State ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The

State ’ s brief is due September 3, 2014.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of August, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21.1


The following are the listing of the subsidiaries of the registrant:

Sherwood Brands, Inc. (the "Company") was incorporated in December 1982 in the
state of North Carolina.

Sherwood Brands, Inc. is the owner of Sherwood Brands, LLC, a Maryland limited
liability company.

Sherwood Overseas, Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sherwood Brands, LLC) was
incorporated in July 1993 in the Bahamas

Sherwood Brands of RI, Inc. was incorporated in September, 1998 in the state of
Rhode Island. Sherwood Brands of RI, Inc. d/b/a E. Rosen Company, E. Rosen
Company - d/b/a School House Candy Co. ("Rosen").
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Incara Pharmaceuticals Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
the date hereof (the Report), I, Clayton I. Duncan, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ CLAYTON I. DUNCANClayton I. DuncanPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 13, 2003
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Michael J.Murry, President and Chief Executive Officer of Catalytica Energy Systems, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)         The Annual Report on Form 10-Kof the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and 

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
|        | By:    | /s/ MICHAEL J.  MURRY                   |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Michael J. Murry                        |
|   | Title: | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|   | Date:  | March 30, 2005                     |
|        |        |                                         |        |  |

 

----
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dana L. Dabney, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Circle Group  Holdings,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report my conclusions  about the  effectiveness
of the  disclosure  controls and  procedures  based on my  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on my most recent  evaluation,  to the  registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's  board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were  significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.

Date:  March 31, 2006
                                                       /S/  DANA L. DABNEY
                                                       --------------------
                                                       Dana L. Dabney
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3438 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 2, 2014 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize 

use of grants under the Urban Area Security Initiative 

and the State Homeland Security Grant Program to 

work in conjunction with a Department of Energy national laboratory. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3438 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Laboratories 

3 Mean National Security Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. USE OF HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT FUNDS IN 

5 CONJUNCTION WITH DEPARTMENT OF EN6 ERGY NATIONAL LABORATORIES. 

7 Section 2008(a) of the Homeland Security Act of 

8 2002 (6 U.S.C. 609(a)) is amended in the matter pre9 ceding paragraph (1) by inserting ‘‘including by working 

10 in conjunction with a National Laboratory (as defined in 

11 section 2(3) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 

12 15801(3)),’’ after ‘‘plans,’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 1, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
There are no accounting changes for the year ended December 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       8,662,000
<SECURITIES>                                 4,487,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               38,118,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   476,000
<INVENTORY>                                 91,034,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           129,672,000
<PP&E>                                      12,649,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,724,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             166,972,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       46,407,000
<BONDS>                                         53,030
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,566,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,628,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               166,972,000
<SALES>                                    164,168,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           167,282,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              100,285,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            56,381,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             415,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,201,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,846,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,355,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,355,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3518 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3518

  To amend the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 with 
   respect to grants for economic adjustment, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 2013

  Mr. Swalwell of California introduced the following bill; which was 
referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in 
  addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 with 
   respect to grants for economic adjustment, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restarting Local Economies Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 209(c) of the Public Works and Economic 
Development Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3149(c)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4) by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (5) by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) the closure of a local government entity that had an 
        economic development mission and left obligations related to 
        economic development projects unfulfilled when closed.''.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Section 204(c) of the Public Works and Economic 
Development Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3144(c)) is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
            ``(4) Closure of local government economic development 
        entity.--In the case of a grant provided under section 209, the 
        Secretary may increase the Federal share above the percentage 
        specified in subsection (a) up to 100 percent of the cost of 
        the applicable project if the Secretary determines that the 
        project assists a community with an economy injured by the 
        closure of a local government entity that had an economic 
        development mission and left obligations related to economic 
        development projects unfulfilled when closed.''.
                                 <all>
```
NUMBER 13-14-00310-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

GRAY, RITTER & GRAHAM, PC; WOLF Appellants,

HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & 

HERZ, LLC; NEBLETT BEARD & 

ARSENAULT, LLP; DON M. DOWNING; 

AND ADAM J. LEVITT,

 

v.

GOLDMAN PHIPPS PLLC F/K/A 

GOLDMAN PENNEBAKER & PHIPPS,

PC; MIKAL C. WATTS, PC; AND 

MURRAY LAW FIRM,

Appellees.

On Appellants’ Emergency Motion to 

Stay All Proceedings in the Underlying Lawsuit.

ORDER
2

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Appellants Gray, Ritter & Graham, PC, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, 

LLC, Neblett Beard & Arsenault, LLP, Don M. Downing, and Adam J. Levitt perfected an 

interlocutory appeal from an order rendered by the County Court at Law Number 3 of 

Nueces County, Texas, in trial court cause number 2012-CCV-62122-3, denying 

appellants’ special appearance. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a)(7) 

(West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) (authorizing interlocutory appeal of order granting 

or denying special appearance). Appellants have filed an “Emergency Motion to Stay All 

Proceedings in the Underlying Lawsuit” during the pendency of the appeal. Appellees 

Goldman Phipps PLLC f/k/a Goldman Pennebaker & Phipps, PC, Mikal C. Watts, PC,

and Murray Law Firm filed a response to the motion.

Having reviewed appellants’ motion and appellees’ response, we hereby GRANT 

the motion in part and DENY it in part. We order all proceedings in trial court cause 

number 2012-CCV-62122-3 STAYED until further order of this Court, EXCEPT that the 

stay shall not apply to discovery requests propounded upon any party that is not named 

as an appellant in this appeal. Any such discovery requests shall proceed during the 

pendency of this appeal according to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Order delivered and filed the

25th day of September, 2014.