alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1996             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                         472,395                 472,395
<SECURITIES>                                 7,172,921               7,172,921
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,480,660               8,480,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                   338,853                 338,853
<INVENTORY>                                 10,189,071              10,189,051
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,830,584              26,830,584
<PP&E>                                       6,487,301               6,487,301
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,348,700               3,348,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,270,740              30,270,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,331,833               8,331,833
<BONDS>                                        543,272                 543,272
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                    19,186,321              19,186,321
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,209,314               2,209,314
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,270,740              30,270,740
<SALES>                                     14,295,047              38,381,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,295,047              38,381,626
<CGS>                                       11,846,101              30,220,866
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,846,101              30,220,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,338,509               3,260,599
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (97,657)                  3,466
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,197,615               2,869,718
<INCOME-TAX>                                   419,165               1,004,401
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            778,450               1,865,317
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   778,450               1,865,317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14                     .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14                     .39
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         109,137
<SECURITIES>                                     6,073
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,232
<INVENTORY>                                     93,859
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               341,995
<PP&E>                                          43,070
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 401,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          214,573
<BONDS>                                          1,718
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            36
<OTHER-SE>                                     185,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   401,601
<SALES>                                        358,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               358,543
<CGS>                                          296,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  296,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,594
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (1,558)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (493)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (510)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (153)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (357)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (357)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.19






Exhibit 10.19



DESCRIPTION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH C. HUNTON TIFFANY, AS AMENDED FEBRUARY 16, 2006



In connection with his retirement from full-time employment with the Company as Chief Executive
Officer, effective June 30, 2004, Mr. Tiffany agreed to serve as the non-executive Chairman of the
Boards of Directors of both the Company and the Bank, and to perform specific duties for the
Company and the Bank on a part-time basis. In connection with Mr. Tiffany’s part-time work for the
Company and the Bank, Mr. Tiffany receives an annual base salary of $82,618. Mr. Tiffany does not
receive any additional cash compensation for his Company and Bank director duties, but does
participate in the non-executive directors’ stock compensation plan. Mr. Tiffany also receives
certain welfare benefits that are generally available to other part-time employees of the Bank. Mr.
Tiffany’s duties under this part-time employment include: overseeing the corporate governance and
board development function and serve as the Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee of the
Company and the Bank; overseeing the development of the Company’s and the Bank’s strategic planning
processes; representing the Company and the Bank to customers, shareholders, community
organizations and local government; and sitting on the Company’s Executive Committee and the Bank’s
Executive Committee, Trust Committee, and Investment/ALCO Committee. This part-time arrangement is
not based on any formal written contract, but the Company and the Bank anticipate that this
specific arrangement (and general annual salary amount) will continue through May 31, 2006.



Beginning June 1, 2006, Mr. Tiffany will receive compensation for his service as a director of the
Company and the Bank in accordance with the Director Compensation schedule included as Exhibit
10.17.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Stanadyne Corporation (Stanadyne) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), we, M. David Jones, Chief Executive
Officer of Stanadyne, and Stephen S. Langin, Chief Financial Officer of Stanadyne, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Stanadyne.



|                                      |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ M. David Jones                    |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen S. Langin  
|M. David Jones                        |  |  |  | Stephen S. Langin      
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|March 31, 2011                        |  |  |  | March 31, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          12,385
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,056
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     42,121
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             330
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        381,395
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,377
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 453,955
<DEPOSITS>                                     322,048
<SHORT-TERM>                                    45,965
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,015
<LONG-TERM>                                     51,999
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 453,955
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,121
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  777
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    99
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,997
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,342
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,810
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,187
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    (228)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  18
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,308
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,012
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,278
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.39
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       588
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,354
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       54
<RECOVERIES>                                        29
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   23
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,377
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6831

BRETT C. KIMBERLIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DENNIS R. BIDWELL, Warden of FCI-Cumberland, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-3829-AW) Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brett C. Kimberlin, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s judgment or order is marked as “filed” on May 22, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on May 26, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the judgment or order was physically entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Brett C. Kimberlin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kimberlin v. Bidwell , No. CA-97-3829-AW (D. Md. May 26, 1998). * We deny Kimberlin’s motion to strike the district court’s amended memorandum, motion for bail pending appeal, motion for staypending appeal, motions for appointment of counsel, and renewed motion for appointment of counsel. We grant his motion to supplement the record. Finally, we dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


         Acadian Consultants Corp.
         B&B (Baltimore-Washington) Acquisition Corp.
         California Medical Record Service Acquisition Corp.
         CH Acquisition Corp.
         Computer Central Corporation
         Deliverex Acquisition Corp.
         Deliverex Sacramento Acquisition Corp.
         DISC Acquisition Corp.
         DPAS Acquisition Corp.
         Imagent Acquisition Corp.
         Information Management Acquisition Corp.
         Input of Texas, Inc.
         Leonard Archives Acquisition Corp.
         Major Acquisition Corp.
         MAVRICC Management Systems, Inc.
         Minnesota Medical Record Service Acquisition Corp.
         MMS Escrow and Transfer Agency, Inc.
         Permanent Records Acquisition Corp.
         Premier Acquisition Corp.
         QCS Inet Acquisition Corp.
         Quality Copy Acquisition Corp.
         RAC (California) Acquisition Corp.
         Recordex Acquisition Corp.
         Researchers Acquisition Corp.
         Robert A. Cook Acquisition Corp.
         The Rust Consulting Group, Inc.
         Texas Medical Record Service Acquisition Corp.
         ZIA Information Analysis Group, Inc.
NO. 12-09-00239-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JOSE B. DE LA CERDA ,

APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 87TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

SUZAN VAUGHN, ' ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jose B. De La Cerda appeals the trial court’s summary judgment order in favor of 

Suzan Vaughn. In one issue, De La Cerda argues that the trial court’s summary judgment

order should be reversed. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

JURISDICTION

De La Cerda seeks direct appeal of the trial court’s order granting summary 

judgment in regard to any claims against Vaughn. However, Vaughn was one of many 

defendants in the suit. The trial court’s summary judgment order disposed only of any 

claims against Vaughn. The record reflects that the claims against the other defendants 

remain active.

As a general rule, a direct appeal may be taken only from a final judgment. 

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). In order to be final and 

appealable, a judgment must dispose of all issues and parties in the case. Id. A summary 

judgment, unlike a judgment signed after a trial on the merits, is presumed to dispose of 

only those issues expressly presented, not all issues in the case. City of Beaumont v. 

Guillory, 751 S.W.2d 491, 492 (Tex. 1988). “A summary judgment that fails to dispose 

expressly of all parties and issues in the pending suit is interlocutory and not appealable 

unless a severance of that phase of the case is ordered by the trial court; in the absence of 

an order of severance, the party against whom an interlocutory summary judgment has 
2

been rendered has his right of appeal when and not before such partial summary 

judgment is merged in a final judgment disposing of all parties and issues.” Id.

The summary judgment order signed by the trial court in the case at hand 

expressly stated that it disposed of De La Cerda’s claims against Vaughn. The order did 

not address the remaining defendants. Nor does the record reflect that any other 

defendant had sought summary judgment. Further, De La Cerda’s claims against Vaughn 

have not been severed from his claims against the other defendants to the suit. See id. 

Therefore, the summary judgment order is interlocutory. See id. Accordingly, the order 

is not appealable, and we have no jurisdiction to review it.1

DISPOSITION

Because we have no jurisdiction to review the order in question, the appeal is 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

 BRIAN HOYLE__ 

 Justice

Opinion delivered August 11, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

 

1 We note the existence of certain statutory exceptions that allow for the direct appeal of an 

interlocutory summary judgment order. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014 (Vernon 2008). 

However, those exceptions are not applicable to this case. See id.
----

|                                                   |                              |  FAX (713)      651-0849       |
|--------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                                                   |                              |                                |
|  1100      LOUISIANA   SUITE 3800  |  HOUSTON, TX      77002-5218 |  TELEPHONE      (713) 651-9191 |

|                |                           |
|---------------------|--------------------------------|
|                |                                |
|                | Ryder      Scott Company, L.P. |
|                |                           |
| Houston,      Texas |                           |
| May      15, 2008   |                           |

|  1200, 530 8TH      AVENUE, S.W.  |  CALGARY,      ALBERTA T2P 358    |  TEL (403)      262-2799 |  FAX (403)      262-2790 |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|  621 17TH      STREET, SUITE 1550 |  DENVER,      COLORADO 80293-1501 |  TEL (303)      623-9147 |  FAX (303)      623-4258 |

----
Exhibit 21.1
                               AXEDA SYSTEMS INC.
                                  SUBSIDIARIES

United States Corporations, wholly owned subsidiaries of Axeda Systems Inc.:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.   RAVISENT IP, Inc.: a Nevada Corporation

2.   RAVISENT Operating Company Inc.: a Delaware Corporation

3.   Liuco, Inc.: a Delaware Corporation

4.   RAVISENT   Technologies   Internet   Appliance  Group,   Inc.:  a  Delaware
     Corporation

Israeli Entity:
---------------

5.   Axeda Systems Ltd.: an Israeli  corporation,  wholly owned by Axeda Systems
     Inc.

Wholly owned subsidiaries of Axeda Systems Ltd.:
------------------------------------------------

6.   Axeda  Systems  Operating  Company,   Inc.:  US  company   incorporated  in
     Massachusetts

7.   eMation R&D, Inc.: US company incorporated in Massachusetts

8.   Axeda Systems S.A.S.: a French corporation

9.   Axeda  Systems  B.V.:  a  corporation  incorporated  under  the laws of the
     Netherlands

10.  Axeda Systems Limited: a UK corporation

11.  Axeda Systems KK: a Japanese corporation

German Entities:
----------------

12.  Erste Cinco  Vermogensverwaltungs  GmbH:  wholly owned  subsidiary of Axeda
     Systems Inc.

13.  Viona   Vervatungs   GmbH:   wholly   owned   subsidiary   of  Erste  Cinco
     Vermogensverwaltungs GmbH.

14.  Viona  Development  Hard and Software  Engineering GmbH & Co. KG: a limited
     partnership owned by Erste Cinco  Vermogensverwaltungs  GmbH (12 above) and
     Viona Vervatungs GmbH (13 above).

15.  Axeda Systems GmbH: wholly owned subsidiary of Axeda Systems Inc.

Canadian Entities:
------------------

16.  RAVISENT Nova Scotia:  an unlimited  liability  Nova Scotia  company wholly
     owned by Axeda Systems Inc.

17.  RAVISENT  British  Columbia:  a  corporation  organized  under  the laws of
     British Columbia wholly owned by RAVISENT Nova Scotia
Filed 6/8/01 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2001 ND 108

Erica Demming, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

William Demming, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20000363

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gary A. Holum, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Donald L. Peterson, Kenner Sturdevant Peterson & Cresap, PC, P.O. Box 970, Minot N.D. 58702-0970, for plaintiff and appellee.

Lynn M. Boughey, Boughey Law Firm, P.O. Box 1206, Minot, N.D. 58702- 1206, for defendant and appellant.

Demming v. Demming

No. 20000363

Per Curiam.

[¶1]William Demming has appealed from a divorce judgment, challenging the failure to grant a continuance, the division of property, the amount of visitation, and the trial court’s decision to allow Erica Demming to move out-of-state with the parties’ child.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7), and Andrews v. O’Hearn, 387 N.W.2d 716 (N.D. 1986).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FRONTIER TELEPHONE FO ROCHESTER, INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>        0000936105
<NAME>       FRONTIER TELEPHONE OF ROCHESTER, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          54,122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,767
<INVENTORY>                                        489
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,001
<PP&E>                                         971,407
<DEPRECIATION>                                 624,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 472,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,242
<BONDS>                                         40,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       232,165
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   472,668
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               252,320
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  182,125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (810)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,239
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 69,766
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,698
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,068
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,068
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>