## 1

**MEMORANDUM TO**  : Andrew Bouchard and Brenda Shine, EPA **FROM** : Mae Thomas, Jason Renzaglia, and Philip Crawford, ERG **DATE** : January

20, 2012 **SUBJECT** : Comparison of Reporting Burden between Hardcopy Reports Submitted under Existing Rules and Semiannual Electronic Reports Submitted for Uniform Standards

**1.0 INTRODUCTION**  All semiannual reporting elements are required to be submitted electronically by the proposed Uniform Standards; this is expected to result in significant cost savings and burden reductions for industry

and regulatory

agencies. In addition, some data elements previously required to be reported semiannually are proposed to be submitted annually in the Uniform Standards

. This memorandum describes the methods and procedures used to estimate the burden as a result of complying with the proposed Uniform Standards semiannual electronic reporting requirements and annual written reporting requirements compared to entirely written reporting requirements in existing rules. This analys is considered routine reporting burden and did not include initial reports (such as the Notification of Compliance Status reports) or reports required in unique situations (such as request for a performanc e test waiver).
Burden reductions were estimated for two model facilities : a refinery and a chemical plant

. These models were selected to provide an estimate of the costs for facilities that are considered typical in size , as well as number and ty pes of applicable rules. This memorandum provides a comparison of burden under existing rules and the proposed Uniform Standards for each model facility . This memorandum also provides a description of each model facility, identifies all applicable regulations and related supporting statements, and describes the specific methodology

for estimating the burden reduction

. This memorandum is organized as follows: 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Results

## 2

3.0 Model Facility

Descriptions 4.0 Methodology 5.0 References Appendix A: Model Facility Descriptions: Rule Applicability Appendix B: Burden Estimation and Supporting Statement Analysis

– Model Refinery Appendix C: Burden Estimation and Supporting Statement Analysis

– Model Chemical Plant Appendix D: Electronic Reporting Cost Analys is **2.0 RESULTS**  For each model facility, the burden was estimated for complying with the proposed Uniform Standards electronic reporting requirements and compared to the burden associated with written reporting requirements in existing rules . It was assumed that the cost of record keeping would not change from existing rules to the proposed Uniform Standards for each model facility

. Table 1 presents the total reporting costs under existing rules, the proposed Uniform Standards, and the potential savings for the model facilities. The model chemical plant is smaller than the model refinery

plant which generally

explains the difference in the burden estimates. **Table 1**  **. Reporting Burden Comparison for Hardcopy and**  **Electronic Reporting under the Proposed Uniform Standards**  **for a Model Refinery and Model Chemical Plant**

**Reporting Scheme Model**  **Refinery Annual Cost**  **($/yr) Model** 

**Chemical Plant Annual**  **Cost ($/yr)** Existing Rules 52,847 16, 014 Proposed Uniform Standards 21,409 1 

## 9,235 1 

## Total Savings 31,438 6,779 **Total Savings (%)** 59 % 42 % 1

– An initial electronic startup cost of $5,333 was calculated for the model refinery and $2,685 for the model chemical plant; these costs are expected to be incurred by each model facility for the first year of compliance with the proposed Uniform Standards

. The initial electronic startup cost is not included in the proposed Uniform Standards annual costs shown

. 

## 3.0 **MODEL FACILITY DESCR IPTIONS**  Two model facilities were developed for the burden reduction estimate : a refinery and a chemical plant

. Each model is representative of ty pical medium sized facilities currently
operating in the United States

. The following section briefly describes each model facility type.

## 3

**3.1 Refinery**  The model refinery

was created using issued Title V air permits for existing refineries. Information regarding process units, emission points, and federal rule applicability w ere extracted from the technical documentation for the Title V permits . The process units associated with existing refineries were compared against the process units at other refineries in the United States using the published list of refineries and process characteristics provided in the Oil and Gas Journal ( Oil & Gas, 2000 )

. This comparison ensured that the model refinery was a typical sized facility

in regards to process unit counts. For example, although one of the existing refineries operates more than one pipe still, only one pipe still was included in the model refinery to reflect a capacity (i.e., 200,000 barrels per day) more typical of refineries located in the United States. Table 2 lists the number and type of process units included in the model refinery

. **Table 2**  **. Number and Type of Process and Emission**  **Point s Included**  **for Model Refinery**  **Process Unit**  **Number of Units** Oil Movements 1 Pipe Stills 1 Sulfur Recovery Unit 1 Alkylation Unit 1 Isomerization Unit 1 Naptha Stream Treatment Plants 2 Ultraformers 2 Hydrogen Unit 1 Cat Feed Hydrotreating 1 Catalytic Refining 1 Fluidized Catalytic Cracking 1 Marine Dock Facility 1 Marketing Terminal 1 **Emission Point** Process Vents 

## 7 Equipment Leaks (Process Units) 

## 16 Transfer Operations 

## 2 External Floating Roof Storage Vessel 

## 37 Internal Floating Roof Storage Vessel 11

## 4

**3.2 Chemical Plant**  The model chemical plant was created using issued Title V air permits for existing chemical plants . Information regarding process units, emission points, and federal rule applicability

was extracted from technical documents for the Title V permits

. Table 3 lists the number and type of process units included in the model chemical plant

. **Table 3**  **. Number and Type of Process and Emission**  **Point s Included**  **for Model Chemical Plant**  **Process Unit Number of Units**  Phenol Production 1 Resin Production 1 Polymer Production 1

**Emission Point** Process Vents 14 Equipment Leaks (Process Units) 3 Transfer Operations 7 Storage Vessels 20



## 4.0 **METHODOLOGY** A similar methodology

was used for both model facilities to develop the burden estimates for the existing regulations and reporting burden for the proposed Uniform Standards. All applicable federal regulations pertaining to each model facility were identified (see Section 4 .1)

. S upporting statements for each applicable rule were gathered and used to estimate the annual record keeping and reporting burden for each model facility under existing requirements (see Section 4 .2)

. The potential reporting cost savings associated with the proposed Uniform S tandards (not considering initial electronic startup costs ) were estimated by comparing reporting costs associated with the Uniform Standards to the reporting cost under existing requirements (see Section 4 .3) . The following sections provide specific details regarding each model facility and the burden reduction and cost estimation methodology

. **4.1 Applicable Rules**  After developing each model facility, the first step in estimating the cost savings consisted of identifying all applicable existing federal regulations for each model

. Overlap of existing applicable rules was considered. For example, 40 CFR 63.640(p) indicates that if an owner or operator is subject to both Subpart CC and an equipment leak rule in 40 CFR 60 and/or

## 5

40 CFR 61, the owner or operator need only comply with Subpart CC. The details of overlapping existing rules are identified in the footnotes to Table 4 and Table 5 of this section. Wastewater regulations were not considered because, at the time of this analys is, the Uniform Standards did not include wastewater requirements.
**4.1.1 Refinery**  Table 4 lists the federal regulations applicable to the model refinery, organized by emission ty

pe. Appendix A provides detail of each process unit and emission point and the corresponding regulation.

**Table 4**  **. Applicable Regulations by Emission Type**

**– Model Refinery** 

**Emission Type Applicable Regulation**  Process Vents 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart CC 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart UUU Equipment Leaks 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart CC 40 CFR Part 61 , Subpart V 1 

## 40 CFR Part 60 , Subpart VV2


## Transfer Operations 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart CC 3 

## 40 CFR Part 60 , Subpart XX 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart Y 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart R

Storage Vessels 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart CC 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart G4 

## 40 CFR Part 60 , Subpart K 40 CFR Part 60 , Subpart Ka 40 CFR Part 60 , Subpart Kb 1

– 40 CFR Part 61 , Subpart J points to 40 CFR Part 61 , Subpart V

. 2

– 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart GGG points to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart VV

. 3

– 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart CC indicates that if 40 CFR Part 60 , Subpart XX applies , the model refinery must comply with 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart CC

. 4

– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CC requires refineries comply with 4 0 CFR Part 63, Subpart G.



## 4.1.2 **Chemical Plant** Table 5 lists the federal regulations applicable to the model chemical plant, organized by emission ty

pe. Appendix A provides detail of each process unit and emission point and the corresponding regulation.

## 6

**Table 5**  **. Appl icable Regulations by Emission**  **Type**

**– Model Chemical Plant** 

**Emission Type Applicable Regulation** 

Process Vents 40 CFR Part 60 , Subpart NNN 1 

## 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart SS 2 

## 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart G 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart FFFF

Equipment Leaks 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart TT 3 

## 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart H4,5 

## 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart I 5 

## 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart FFFF Transfer Operations 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart G 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart FFFF
Storage Vessels 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart G 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart FFFF 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart SS 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Kb 1

– The process tank vent is subject to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart RRR; however, pursuant to 40 CFR 60.700(c)(5), the vent complies with 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart NNN

. 2

– Pursuant to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YY, it was assumed that the TRE is below 4.0 for two vent gas absorbers and the model facility must comply with 40 CFR 63, Subpart SS

. 3

– Pursuant to 40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart YY , it was assume d that the model chemical pl ant has chosen to comply with the requirements of 40 CFR 63, Subpart TT, instead of the requirements of 40 CFR 63, Subpart UU. 4

– It was assumed that the model chemical plant has elected to comply with 40 CFR Part 63, subpart H for all equipment in this process unit. Compliance with the provisions of 40 CFR 63, Subpart H, shall be deemed to constitute compliance with 40 CFR part 60, subpart VV. 5

– E quipment in methylene chloride service located in a process producing polycarbonates are regulated under 40 CFR 63, Subpart H and I instead of 40 CFR 63, Subpart YY

. 

## 4.2 **Determination of Burden Under Existing Rules** After identifying all federal regulations applicable to the model facilities, supporting statements were collected from the EPA "Information Collection Request, Review, and Approval System" (ICRAS) system and rule making dockets. Supporting statements provide a detailed estimation of the respondent burden and costs as a result of demonstrating compliance through testing, monitoring, record keeping, and reporting with a particular regulation. Supporting statements generally

provide burden estimates for the first three years in which affected sources must demonstrate compliance. Each supporting statement generally contains standardized respondent burden and co st algorithms. These algorithms identify each burden item (e.g., reading instructions for reporting

## 7

requirements, conducting performance tests or equipment leak monitoring, creating a periodic report, maintain records, etc.) and an associated estimate of the hourly requirement for each occurrence of the burden item. The algorithm ty pically contains an estimate of the number of occurrences, per ye ar, for each burden item, and the number of respondents per year. The algorithms generally multiply the hourly requirement per burden item by the number of occurrences per ye ar, and by the number of respondents per year to obtain a technical personnel hourly requirement for all affected sources on an annual basis

. Managerial and clerical hours are usually obtained b y multiplying the annual technical hourly requirement by

standardized factors

. Managerial and clerical hours were assumed to be five and ten percent of the annual technical hourly requirement, respectively. The annual hourly requirements for each labor category (i.e., technical, managerial, and clerical) are multiplied by standardized labor rates to obtain an annual cost for all sources affected by the regulation. Although supporting statements are relatively consistent with regards to methodology, the accounting for the number of occurrences per respondent and respondents per year varies from rule to rule. For example, for certain regulations, the supporting statement algorithm may estimate the hourly re quirement for a particular emission point as equivalent for all affected sources (i.e., the number of respondents per ye ar for a performance test for one supporting statement might be equal to the number of affected sources) whereas another supporting statement may

account for each individual process vent at all affected sources when estimating the number of respondents per year. To develop an annual burden estimate for each model facility, supporting statements for all applicable regulations were carefully reviewed to identify how the number of occurrences per respondent and respondents per year were determined

. The same determination processes were then applied to each model facility to estimate the annual hourly burden for record keeping and reporting under existing rules . Additionally, any initial or “one

-time” burden items were ignored since the model facilities were assumed to be existing sources and already in compliance with any initial or “one

-time” burden items. After determining annual hourly burdens for each model facility, the hourly requirements were multiplied by

standardized labor rates to obtain annual record keeping and reporting costs

. Labor rates were based on U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics labor rates (DOL, 2009). A fringe benefit loading rate of 1.5 and an overhead and profit rate of 1.4 were

## 8

multiplied by

each hourly rate to obtain loaded rates. Calculated hourly labor rates are presented in Table 6

. **Table 6. Summary of 2009 Hourly Labor Rates**

**Labor Class (A)**  **Mean hourly labor rate**  **1** 

## ($/hr) **(B)**

**Fringe benefit**  **loading rate (C)** 

**Overhead and profit**  **rate (D=AxBxC)** 

**Loaded wage rate**  **($/hr)** Professional Specialty and Technical (SOC Code: 17

-2081) 39.53 1.5 1.4 83.01 Executive, Administrative and Managerial (SOC Code: 11

- 9041) 57.8 1.5 1.4 121.38 Administrative Support, Including Clerical (SOC Code: 43

- 0000) 17.31 1.5 1.4 36.35 

## Appendi ces B and C contain detailed analys es of each supporting statement algorithm along with any assumptions associated with each model facility burden estimates.
**4.3 Determination of**  **Uniform Standards Reporting Costs** In an effort to reduce the record keeping and reporting burden for industry and regulatory agencies, the proposed Uniform Standards require some electronic reporting in lieu of more traditional hardcop y methods. Inparticular, reports proposed to be submitted electronically in the Uniform Standards include all performance test rep orts, CEMS performance evaluation reports, the 40 CFR part 65, subparts I and J portions of the notification of compliance status reports required b y 40 CFR part 65, subparts I and J, and semiannual periodic reports specified in 40 CFR part 65, subparts H, I,J, and M. All other reports would be submitted in hardcopy or other method mutually

agreed to between the source and the delegated authority

. The potential reporting cost savings associated with the proposed Uniform S tandards (not considering initial
e lectronic startup costs ) were estimated for each model facility by comparing reporting costs associated with the Uniform Standards to the reporting costs estimated for existing regulations.
**4.3.1 Determination of**  **Initial Electronic Reporting Costs**  Initial costs of electronic reporting were estimated for each facility by first estimating the number of data elements included in the initial setup for electronic reporting for the model facility

. Itwas assumed that sources will need to enter information about their facility that will include general information about their processes, emission units subject to rules, and basic information about the rules that apply

. For example, in addition to general identification

## 9

information for the facility, the following data elements were expected to be required for the initial transfer operations setup : control ty pe, the control equipment identification, the ty pe of material transferred, the capacity of the transfer system, and the annual av erage of actual material loaded . In addition, five miscellaneous data elements were also added to the count of data elements due to unknown requirements of the electronic reporting program. Since sources will have to report similar information under multiple rules, the number of applicable regulations was then added to the count of data elements . The number of applicable regulations was not multiplied by

the data element count because sources are expected to be able to simply assign the data elements to multiple rules instead of c ompletely re - entering each data element. The total count of data elements (including the number of applicable regulations) for each emission source ty

pe was multiplied by

the number of emission sources at each model facility . In the case of transfer operations at the model refinery, ten data elements were added to four applicable rules for a total of fourteen entries. The fourteen entries were then multiplied by two transfer operations (e.g., two transfer operations exist at the model refinery) for a total of twentyeight data entry

elements for transfer operations at the model refinery . The total number of data entry elements for each emission source was then divided by a factor of twenty

- five data elements entered per hour. This hourly requirement was regarded as the initial technical hourly requirement for electronic reporting. Using this methodology, the initial hourly requirements for electronic reporting startup were determined for each model facility and emission source type ; these are presented in Appendix D

. The managerial and clerical hours were obtained b y using the same standardized factors described in section 4 .2. Initial costs were obtained by multiplying the hourly requirements b y the hourly labor rates presented in Table 6 in section 4 .2 and are presented in Appendix D

. **4.3.2 Determination of**  **Annual Electronic Reporting Costs**  Annual costs of electronic reporting under the Uniform Standards were estimated in a fashion similar to the initial costs of electronic reporting. For simplicity, annual and semiannual reporting costs were first estimated as if all existing written reporting were converted to electronic reporting. All data elements that would be required to be reported on an annual or semiannual basis by

the proposed Uniform Standards were identified and categorized as such. Then, using equipment counts and other information about the model facility, the number of data

## 10

elements to be entered per year into the electronic rep orting program was identified. The total number of data entry

re cords to be entered into the electronic reporting program was divided by a factor of twenty- five data elements entered per hour. This hourly requirement was regarded as the annual technical hourly requirement for electronic reporting. Managerial and cleric al hours, and the costs associated with those hourly requirements , were determined in the same manner as the initial costs. The cost associated with the additional requirement in the Uniform Standards to semiannually electronically report daily and operating block averages was computed by assuming 1 hour per process vent to upload data entered twice a ye ar. In order to get a total annual cost associated with electronic semiannual and written annual reports , the portion of costs associated with electronic annual reporting was converted to costs associated with written annual reporting using a ratio. The ratio was computed by dividing the costs associated with written reporting under existing rules by the sum of the Uniform Standards costs associated with semiannual periodic electronic reports and two times the costs associated with annual periodic electronic reports

. The annual costs were multiplied by two because, under most existing rules, these reporting elements are required to be submitted semiannually

. This ratio represents a conversion factor between electronic and written reporting burden. Finally, the potential reporting cost savings associated with the proposed Uniform S tandards was determined by subtracting the total costs associated with electronic semiannual and written annual reports , from the total annual cost associated with written reporting under existing rules (see Section 4.2 for determination of burden under existing rules )

. The annual electronic reporting cost analys is as described here is presented in Appendix D to this document.

**5.0 REFERENCES**  U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics (DOL). 2009. Occupational employ ment statistics: May

2009 Employ

ment wage e stimates. <http://stats.bls.gov/oes/current/oessrci.htm>. November. Stell, J. 2000. U

. S

. Refineries

- State Capacities as of January 1, 2001. Oil & Gas Journal

. 99 : 52. Infor mation Collection Request (ICR) Supporting Statements:

## 11

a. The Consolidated Air Rule (CAR) for the S ynthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) (Renewal) . 2010. EPA ICR Number 1854.07, OMB Control Number 2060

- 0443

. b. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Gasoline Distribution Facilities (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart R) (Renewal) . 2010. EPA ICR Number 1659.07, OMB Control Number 2060

- 0325.
c. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Marine Tank Vessel Loading Operations (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Y) . 2010. EPA ICR Number 1679.08. d. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Petroleum Refineries (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CC) (Renewal) . 2009. EPA ICR Number 1692.06, OMB Control Number 2060

- 0340.
e. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories: Generic Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards (40 CFR part 63, subpart YY) (Renewal) . 2009. EPA ICR Number 1871.05, OMB Control Number 2060

- 0420

. f. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Petroleum Refineries, Cataly tic Cracking, Reforming and Sulfur Units (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUU) (Renewal) . 2009. EPA ICR Number 1844.04, OMB Control Number 2060

- 0554. g. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart FFFF) (Renewal) . 2010. EPA ICR Number 1 9 69.04. h. New Source Performance Standards for Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids for which Construction, Reconstruction or Modification Commenced After June 11, 1973, and Prior to May

19, 1978 (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart K) (Renewal) . 2010. EPA ICR Number 1797.05, OMB Control Number 2060

- 0442. i. New Source Performance Standards for Bulk Gasoline Terminals (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart XX) (Renewal) . 2008. EPA ICR Number 0664.09, OMB Control Number 2060

- 0006. j. New Source Performance S tandards for Equipment Leaks of VOC in Petroleum Refineries (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart GGG and GGGa) (Renewal). 2011. EPA ICR Number 0983.12, OMB Control Number 2060

- 0067.

## Appendix A: **Model Facility Descriptions :**  **Rule Applicability**

## A

- 1

**Table A.1 Model Refinery**

**– Rule Applicability Table for Process Vents, Equipment Leaks, and Transfer Operations** 

**Process Description Process Vent**  **Equipment Leak s**  **Transfer Operations**

**40 CFR Part 63, Subpart**  **CC Petroleum**  **Refineries (process**  **vents) [1]**  **40 CFR Part 63,**

**Subpart UUU Catalytic**  **Crack ing Units,**  **Catalytic Reforming Units,**  **and Sulfur Recovery Units**  **40 CFR Part**

**63, Subpart CC**  **Petroleum Refineries**  **(equipment leak**  **s) 40 CFR Part** 

**61 Subpart J points to**  **40 CFR Part 61**  **Subpart V Equipment**  **Leak s**  **(Fugitive Em** **ission Sources)**  **40 CFR Part**

**60, Subpart GGG points**  **to 40 CFR Part**  **60, Subpart VV**  **Equipment Leak**  **s of VOC in the SOCMI**  **40 CFR Part 63,**

**Subpart CC Petroleum**  **Refineries (transfer**  **operations) [2]**  **40 CFR**

**Part 60, Subpart XX**  **Bulk Gasoline**  **Term inals**  **40 CFR Part**

**63, Subpart Y Marine Tank**  **Vessel Loading**  **Operations 40 CFR Part** 

**63, Subpart R Gasoline**  **Distribution Facilities** 

1 and 2 Pipe Stills x x Sulfur Recovery Unit x Alkylation Unit x x x Isomerization Unit x x x No.2 Treatment Plant x x No.4 Treatment Plant x x Storage and Loading Facilities x x No.3 Ultraformer x x x x No.4 Ultraformer x x x Hydrogen Unit x x Cat Feed Hydrotreating x x Catalytic Refining x x x Fluidized Catalytic Cracking x x x Oil Movements x x x Marketing Terminal x x x Marine Dock Facility x x x x x Vapor Recovery 1 x x Vapor Recovery 2 x x x

**TOTAL 4**  **4 16**  **3 16**  **2 1**  **1 1** 
[1] Alkylation Unit: off gas knock out drum (D

- 3) controlled by a flare (F

- 27); spent acid stripper drum (D

-4) controlled by a flare (F

- 27); and spent caustic drum (D

- 5) controlled by a flare (F

- 27). Isomerization Unit: flare knock out drum (D

- 1) controlled by a f lare (F

- 2). No.3 Ultraformer: flare gas separator (D

- 1) controlled by a flare (F

- 2). Vapor Recovery Unit 300: off

- gas knock out drum (D

2) controlled by a flare (F

- 3). [2] Subpart CC says that if Subparts XX and/or QQQ apply, comply with Subpart CC.

## A

- 2 **Table A.2 Model Refinery**

**– Rule Applicability Table for Storage Vessels** 
**Storage Vessel Description Rule** 

**Tank ID**  **# Year Installed**  **Size Control**  **Required? Control**  **[1] Liquid Type**  **Vapor Pressure**  **40 CFR**

**Part 63, Subpart**  **CC 40 CFR** 

**Part 63, Subpart G**  **40 CFR**

**Part 60,**  **Subpart K 40 CFR** 

**Part 60, Subpart Ka**  **40 CFR**

**Part 60, Subpart Kb** 
3486 1979 4,026,505 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x x x 3511 1973 4,066,214 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x x x 3532 1 953 868,306 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x x 3533 1953 4,235,640 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x x 3601 1 977 3,702,020 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x x x 3909 1956 3,388,512 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x x 3915 1 980 6,353,460 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x x x 3917 1980 25,413,839 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x x x 3534 1 955/1973 71,000 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3537 1962/1974 56,000 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3605 1 977 3,702,000 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3480 1 982 4,026,505 Y IFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3487 1980 4,026,505 Y IFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3525 1 981 4,026,505 Y IFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3526 1943/1979 4,026,505 Y IFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3553 1 981 5,070,343 Y IFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3554 1981 5,070,343 Y IFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3602 1 979 3,856,271 Y IFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3604 1980 3,856,271 Y IFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3702 1 943/1982/1997 3,382,264 Y IFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3703 1944/1982 3,382,264 Y IFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3704 1 944/1980 3,382,264 Y IFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3916 1980 13,666,998 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3918 1 980 13,666,998 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3919 1 980 13,666,998 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x

## A

- 3 **Table A.2 Model Refinery**

**– Rule Applicability Table for Storage Vessels**  **(Cont.)**

**Storage Vessel Description Rule** 

**Tank ID #**  **Year Installed Size**  **Control Required?**  **Control Liquid Type**  **Vapor Pressure**  **40 CFR**

**Part 63, Subpart**  **CC 40 CFR** 

**Part 63, Subpart G**  **40 CFR**

**Part 60, Subpart K**  **40 CFR**

**Part 60, Subpart**  **Ka 40 CFR** 

**Part 60, Subpart**  **Kb** 3920 1980 13,666,998 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3474 1992 3,734,422 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3475 1994 3,865,445 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3476 1 984 3,085,016 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3484 1 996 3,865,445 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3488 1994 3,865,445 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3489 1 996 3,865,445 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3493 1995 3,865,445 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3514 1 984 4,066,214 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3527 1991 3,382,264 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3528 1 993 3,865,445 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3549 1993 588,283 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3558 1 972/1986 376,501 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3600 1993 847,128 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3622 1 993 3,865,445 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3629 1992 3,865,445 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3701 1 943/1993 3,382,264 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3715 1945/1987/1998 3,382,264 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3716 1996 3,865,445 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3860 1 993 211,782 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3904 1956/1986 3,388,512 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3907 1 956/1996 3,388,512 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x 3911 1956/1986 3,388,512 Y EFR petroleum hydrocarbon <15 psia x **TOTAL 8**  **8 5**  **18 22**  [1] EFR

- External Floating Roof ; IFR

- Internal Floating Roof

## A

-4

**Table A.3 Model Chemical Plant**

**– Rule Applicability for Process Vents, Equipment Leaks, and Transfer Operations** 

**Process Description Process Vent**  **Equipment Leak s**  **Transfer Operations 40 CFR**  **Part 60, Subpart**  **NNN 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart**  **SS 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart**  **G 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart**  **FFFF 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart**  **TT 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart**  **H 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart**  **I 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart**  **FFFF 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart**  **G 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart**  **FFFF** Distillation (process with scrubber) x x 1 Process Tank Vent (routed to distillation) x2 Detoxification Knockout Drum (with thermal catalytic control) x3 Oxidate Vent Chiller Condenser x 1 Column Vent Chiller Condenser x 1 Air Oxidation Vent to Carbon Adsorbers x 1 Resin Vent Gas Absorber #1 x4 Resin Vent Gas Absorber #2 x4 Process Vent Controlled by Catalytic Oxidizer x3 Vent Tank Condenser x 1 Stripper Vent Condenser x 1 Resin Reactor x 1 Process Vent with Hydrogen Halide and Halogen HAP x3 Condenser Vent x 1 Equipment in the Phenol plant x 5 x Equipment in methylene chloride service located in the Resin area x6 x6 Equipment in HAP service in Resin area x7 Equipment that produces polymer x Phenol Loading Operation x 8 Phenol Rail Car Loading x 8 Truck Loading Connection #1 x 8 Truck Loading Connection #2 x 8 Truck Loading Connection #3 x 8 Truck Loading Connection #4 x 8 Railcar Loading Arms x 8

## A

- 5

**Table A.3 Model Chemical Plant**

**– Rule Applicability**  **for Process Vents, Equipment Leaks, and Transfer Operations (Cont.)** 

**Process Description Process Vent**  **Equipment Leak s**  **Transfer Operations 40 CFR**  **Part 60, Subpart**  **NNN 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart**  **SS 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart**  **G 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart**  **FFFF 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart**  **TT 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart**  **H 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart I**  **40 CFR**

**Part 63 Subpart**  **FFFF 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart**  **G 40 CFR** 

**Part 63 Subpart**  **FFFF TOTAL**  **2 2**  **5 6**  **1 2**  **1 2**  **1 5**  [1]

- Group 2 process vent with recovery device. [2] Process vent is subject to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart RRR; however, pursuant to 40 CFR 60.700(c)(5), VOC emissions from the process tank vent, shall be considered in compliance with the provisions of Subpart RRR because the vent stream is routed to a distillation unit (C

- 1) subject to 40 CFR 60, Subpart NNN and has no other releases to the air except for a pressure relief valve. [3] Group 1 process vent with control equipment. [4] Process vent is subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YY; however, there are no applicable requirements (or standards) for process vents with TRE index values greater than 4.0. [5] Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.160(c), the chemical plant has elected to comply with 40 CFR Part 63, subpart H for all equipment in this process unit. All VOC’s in the phenol operations shall be considered, for purposes of applicability and compliance with 40 CFR Part 63, subpart H, as if it were organic hazardous air pollutant. C ompliance with the provisions of 40 CFR 63, Subpart H, shall be deemed to constitute compliance with 40 CFR part 60, subpart VV. [6] Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.190(b)(4), Subpart I, these components are regulated under 40 CFR 63, Subpart H and I instead of 40 CFR 63, Subpart YY. [7] 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart YY points to 40 CFR Part 63 Subparts TT and UU. Pursuant to Table 5 of 40 CFR 63.1103(d), Subpart YY, the chemical plant has chosen to comply with the requirements of 40 CFR 63, Subpart TT, instead of the requirements of 40 CFR 63, Subpart UU. [8] Group 2 loading operation.

## A

- 6 **Table A.4 Model Chemical Plant** 

**– Rule Applicability for Storage Vessels** 
**Storage Vessel Description Rule**  **Tank ID #**  **Year Installed Size**  **Control 40 CFR Part 63,**  **Subpart G 40 CFR Part 63** 

**Subpart FFFF 40 CRF Part 63** 

**Subpart SS 40 CFR Part 60,** 

**Subpart Kb** Phenol Tank #1 after 1984 >=75m^3 IFR x [1] Phenol Tank #2 after 1984 >=75m^3 EFR x [1] Phenol Tank #3 x [2] Phenol Tank #4 x [2] Phenol Tank #5 x [2] Phenol Tank #6 x [2] Phenol Tank #7 x [2] Phenol Tank #8 x [2] Phenol Tank #9 IFR x [1] Phenol Tank #10 EFR x [1] Resin Tank #1 75<x<151m^3 x [3] Resin Tank #2 75<x<151m^3 x [3] Resin Tank #3 75<x<151m^3 x [3] Resin Tank #4 75<x<151m^3 x [3] Resin Tank #5 75<x<151m^3 x [3] Resin Tank #6 75<x<151m^3 x [3] Resin Tank #7 x [2] Resin Tank #8 x [2] Resin Tank #9 x [2] Resin Tank #10 x [2] **TOTAL 8**  **4 6**  **2** [1] Group 1 Process Tank (control required) [2] Group 2 Process Tank (control required) [3] I n order to comply with 40 CFR 63, Subpart YY, pursuant to the control requirements of 40 CFR 63, Subpart SS, this chemic al plant reduces HAP emissions by 95 weight percent by routing emissions from these tanks to the polycarbonate production process w here methylene chloride is recovered and recycled. No record keeping and reporting estimated for these tanks, since only initial records and reports are required.

## Appendix B:

**Burden Estimation and Supporting Statement Analysis** 

**– Model Refinery** 

## B

- 1 **Table B.1 Model Refinery**
**- Summary of Potential Cost Savings Associated with** 

**Uniform Standard Electronic Semiannual Reporting**

**RULE (A) Recordk**  **eeping (B) Reporting Under Ex** **isting Rules Via Paper Methods**  **(C) Reporting Under Proposed Uniform Standards**  **with Electronic Elements Removed**  **[1]** Part 63, Subpart CC $10,848 $18,357 $4,265 Part 60, Subpart K $834 $0 $0 Part 60, Subpart Ka $2,058 $742 $93 Part 60, Subpart Kb $12,331 $22,029 $0 Part 63, Subpart G $4,543 $8,010 $0 Part 60, Subpart VV $0 $0 $0 Part 61, Subpart V $0 $0 $0 Part 60, Subpart GGG $0 $0 $0 Part 63, Subpart R $17,152 $1,854 $0 Part 60, Subpart XX $0 $0 $0 Part 63, Subpart Y $116 $0 $0 Part 63, Subpart UUU $4,844 $1,854 $0 **Total $52,726**  **$52,847 $4,358**  (D) I nitial Electronic Start

-up Cost for Proposed Uniform Standards $5,333 (E) Cost of Semiannual Electronic Reporting for proposed Uniform Standards $4,992 (F) Cost of Annual Electronic Reporting for proposed Uniform Standards $1,502 (G) Written to Electronic Reporting Burden Ratio (G=B/(E+2F)) [2] 6.61 (H) Administrative Preparation for Electronic Data Entry

– management of log in information, etc. $834 (I) Additional Reporting Requirement in Uniform Standards

- Cost to semiannually report daily and operating block averages, required in §65. 882(e)

. [3] $1,298 (J) Proposed Uniform Standards Reporting Costs for Electronic Semiannual and Written Annual Reports (J=C+E+(F*G)+H+I) [4] $21,409 (K) Potential Reporting Cost Savings Not Considering I nitial Electronic Startup Costs for Proposed Uniform Standards (K=B

- J) **$31,438** (L) Savings Percentage

- Reporting Cost Basis (L=K/B*100) **59%** (M) Savings Percentage

- Record Keeping and Reporting Cost Basis (M=K/(A+B)*100) **30%** [1] Certain reporting elements are not able to be transferred to the electronic cost such as reading and understanding the reporting requirements; therefore, costs for such items are retained. [2 ] Burden for annual reports multiplied by two because these are required semiannually under most existing rules. This ratio provides a general conversion between burden for electronic and written reports. [ 3 ] Assumes 1 hour per process vent to upload data (7 process vents) entered twice a year for semiannual reporting for a total of 14 technical hours. Managerial and clerical hours were assumed to be five and ten percent of the annual technical hourly requirement, respectively. Rates used are in Table 6 of memo. [4] Annual reports are required in written format, therefore the burden associated with electronic annual reports was converted to burden for writ ten reports (E*F).

## B

- 2 **Table B.2 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CC Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[1]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for**  **SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for** **the Model Refinery**  **per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial**  **$1 21.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**
**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 2. Survey and Studies N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 3. Acquisition, Installation, and Utilization of Technology and Systems 4. Reporting Requirements A. Read instructions and planning Initial: i. General/applicability 20 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 ii. Storage vessels 20 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 iii. Process units

–LD AR 20 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 iv. Process vents 20 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Periodic: i. General/applicability 4 2 8 4 2 8 8 0.4 0.8 741.7 ii. Storage vessels 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 0.1 0.2 185.4 iii. Process units

–LD AR 2 2 4 2 1 4 4 0.2 0.4 370.9 iv. Process vents 2 2 4 2 2 4 4 0.2 0.4 370.9 B. Required activities Initial: i. General: applicability 10 1 10 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 ii. Storage vessels 88 0.9 79.2 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 iii. Process units

–LD AR 8 1.1 88 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
iv. Process vents

- initial performance test 11 0.2 22 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0.0

## B

- 3 **Table B.2 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part**  **63, Subpart CC Supporting Statement Analysis (Cont.)**  **[1]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for**  **SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for** **the Model Refinery**  **per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hou rs**  **(hr/yr) Clerical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial**  **$121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr** 
**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)**
v. Process vents

-repeat performance test 11 0.1 11 0 [3] 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
Periodic i. General/applicability 3 2 6 3 2 6 6 0.3 0.6 556.3 ii. Storage vessels 4 9 36 0 [4] 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 iii. Process units

–LD AR 1 [5] 16 16 16 0.8 1.6 1,483.4 iv. Process vents 2 24 48 2 3 [6] 6 6 0.3 0.6 556.3 C. Create information See 4B D. Gather existing information See 4B E. Write report Startup, shutdown and malfunction plan 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
Notification of compliance status i. Storage vessels 1 0.9 0.9 0 [2 ] 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 ii. Process units

–LDAR 4 1.1 4.4 0 [2 ] 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 iii. Process vents 1 0.9 0.9 0 [2 ] 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
Notification of

storage vessel inspection 1 0.9 0.9 0 [2 ] 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
Notification of reconstruction

-process vent control device 4 0.4 1.6 0 [2 ] 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Notification of performance test See 4B Startup, shutdown and malfunction reports NA Semiannual compliance reports: reports:

## B

-4 **Table B.2 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CC Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for**  **SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for** **the Model Ref**  **inery per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial**  **$121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr** 
**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** i. General 18 2 36 18 2 36 36 1.8 3.6 3,337.7 ii. Storage vessels 1 18 18 1 [ 7 ] 8 [ 8 ] 8 8 0.4 0.8 741.7 iii. Storage vessels seal gap failure 3 2 6 3 [ 7 ] 0.9 [8,9 ] 3 3 0.15 0.3 278.1
iv. Process units

–LD AR 3 22 66 3 32 96 96 4.8 9.6 8,900.5 v. Process vents 1.5 4 6 1.5 6 [10 ] 9 9 0.45 0.9 834.4 5. Recordkeeping Require me nts A. Read instructions See 4A B. Plan activities See 4A C. Implement activities See 4B D. Develop record system N A Initial: i. Storage vessels 2 0.9 1.8 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0 ii. Process units

–LDAR 75 1.1 82.5 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0 iii. Process vents 2 0.9 1.8 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Periodic i. Storage vessels 2 18 36 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 ii. Process units

–LDAR 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 iii. Process vents 2 9 18 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 E. Time to enter information and trans mit it Initial: i. Storage vessels 6 0.9 3.6 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0 ii. Process units

–LDAR 99 1.1 108 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0

## B

- 5 **Table B.2 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CC Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for**  **SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for** **the Model Refinery**  **per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial**  **$121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr** 
**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** iii. Process vents 12 0.2 24 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Periodic i. Storage vessels 3.5 18 63 0 [4] 16 0 0 0 0 0.0 ii. Process units

–LDAR 99 11 1,089 1 [5,1 1 ] 16 16 16 0.8 1.6 1,483.4
iii. Process vents 15 4 60 15 6 [10 ] 90 90 4.5 9 8,344.3 F. Time to train personnel Initial: i. Storage vessels 1 0.9 0.9 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0 ii. Process units

–LD AR 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0 iii. Process vents 1 0.4 0.4 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Periodic i. Storage vessels NA ii. Process units

–LD AR 0.5 [5] 16 8 8 0.4 0.8 741.7 iii. Process vents 1 4 4 1 3 3 3 0.15 0.3 278.1 **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper (Sum of Items 1 through 4) 18,357**  **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting (Sum of Periodic Items under 4.A and 4.B) 4,265**  **TOTAL Record Keeping (Sum of Periodic Items under 5.D, 5.E, and 5.F) 10,848**  [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estim ate

. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rule making docket. [2] For the purposes of the Model Plant burden estimate, we are excluding the cost of reporting associated with construction and reconstruction of existing plants. The SFI estimated that 10% of existing facil ities would be affected by this reporting burden. [3] For the purposes of the Model Plant burden estimate, we are excluding the co st of repeating performance tests. [4] Required activities reporting burden is accounted for in the HON

- Subpart G and has been set equal to zero in the Subpart CC analysis. [5] The LDAR burden is reflected here, in the Subpart CC burden. The Subpart VV burden estimate has been set equal to zero fo r LDAR to avoid double counting. [6] Assumed three process vents

- the number of Subpart CC applicable miscellaneous process vents - note that the isomerization unit and the No. 3 Ultraformer share a common process vent control device.

## B

- 6 **Table B.2 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CC Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

[7] The HON storage burden estimate for the model refinery was done using a table modeled from the subpart Kb Burden table (B

- 6). Because Subp art Kb does not require semiannual reporting, the semiannual reporting require me nts have been maintained in the Subpart CC analysis. [ 8 ] Number of occurrences have been reduced by half since the HON accounts for half of the burden through annual reporting. The HON ICR analysis used annua l reporting instead of semiannual because it directly copied the methodology in the 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Kb ICR, which only re quires reports of the gap measurement results once per year. [ 9 ] Assumed the same non- compliance rate (1/9) as the original Subpart CC SFI

. [1 0 ] Semiannual reports for three control devices. [1 1 ] Typo in the Subpart CC ICR Table

. Fo otnote in original table clarifies the correct number is 77; changed to 1 hour because Method 21 testing is counted in cost impacts and 1 hour per process unit should be adequate time to transmit the data from

the analyzer to a computer.

## B

- 7 **Table B.3 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart K Supporting Statement**  **Analysis [**  **1]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**

**Person**
  ** hours per** **occurrence for SFI**  **(from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
****

**hours per respondent**  **per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
 

** hours per** **occurrence applicable**  **to Model Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for** **the Model Refinery per**  **year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial**  **$121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr** 

**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 2. Survey and Studies N/A 3. Acquisition, Installation, and Utilization of Technology and Systems N/A
4. Reporting Requirements A. Read instructions Included in 4E B. Required activities: Included in 4E iii. Monitoring of operations and emissions D. Gather Existing Information Included in 4E E. Write report i. Notification of reconstruction/modification 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. Recordkeeping Require me nts
A. Read instructions Included in 4E B. Plan activities Included in 4E C. Implement activities Included in 4E D. Develop record system N/A E. Time to enter and transmit information: i. Records of startup, shutdown, or malfunction 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 0.15 0.3 278.14

## B

- 8 **Table B.3 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart K Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**

**Person**
  ** hours per** **occurrence for SFI**  **(from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
****

**hours per respondent**  **per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
 

** hours per** **occurrence applicable**  **to Model Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for** **the Model Refinery per**  **year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Techn ical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**

**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** ii. Record petroleum

liquid stored 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 3 1.5 1.5 0.075 0.15 139.07 iii. Record of storage performance tests 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 3 1.5 1.5 0.075 0.15 139.07 iv. Record true vapor pressure of liquid stored 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 0.15 0.3 278.14 F. Time to train personnel N/A G. Time for audits N/A **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper 0**  **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting 0**  **TOTAL Record Keeping (Sum of Items under 5.E) 834**  [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rule making docket.

## B

- 9 **Table B.4 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ka Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[1]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H )**  **(I)**
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per respondent per**  **year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence applicable to**  **Mo del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**for the Model Ref**  **inery per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**
**(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read Instruction Included in 3B. B. Required Activities Vapor recovery information 20 1 20 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 Measure seal gap Included in 4E. C. Create Information Included in 3B. D. Gather Existing Information 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.05 0.1 92.71 E. Write Report Notification of construction 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of actual startup 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of gap measure me nt 1.5 1 1.5 4 [3] 6 6 0.3 0.6 556.28 Report of seal gap excess 2.5 0.03 2.5 0.4 [4] 1 1 0.05 0.1 92.71 Information on vapor recovery Included in 3B. 4. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read Instructions Included in 3B. B. Plan Activities Included in 3B C. Im plement Activities Included in 3B D. Develop Record N/A E. Time to Enter New tank seal gap measure me nts 250 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Secondary seal gap 250 [5] 1 5 4 20 20 1 2 1,854.28

## B

- 10 **Table B.4 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ka Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H )**  **(I)**
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for SFI**  **(from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per respondent per**  **year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence applicable to**  **Mo del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**for the Model Refinery per**  **year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**
**(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** Primary seal gap measurements 20 [5] 0.2 2 0.8 [3] 1.6 1.6 0.08 0.16 148.34

Fill/refill record 2 [ 6 ] 1 0.2 3 0.6 0.6 0.03 0.06 55.63 **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper (Sum 3.B, 3.C, 3.D, 3.E) 742**  **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting (Item 3.D) 93**  **TOTAL Record Keeping (Sum of Items under 4.E) 2,058**  [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate

. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rule making docket. [2] Vapor recovery is not used on any storage tanks in the model refinery. [3] The seal gap measure me nts apply only to the 4 external floating roofs (EFRs); therefore, 4 occurrences per year for the annual requirement and 0.8 for the 5 year requirement. [4] Assumed the same non- compliance rate (1/9) as in the Subpart CC suppo rting statement. [5] The 250 hours in the SFI is 5 hours per tank and 50 tanks per facility. The 20 hours in the SFT represents 2 hours per tank for 20% of the tanks at the facility (50 tanks) for a total of 20 hours. The 5 and 2 hour/tank burden estimates were used for the model refinery estimate. [6] The SFI used an estimate of 0.2 hours per tank for the fill or refill record, or a total of 2 hours for 20% of the tanks. The model refinery has a total of 15 tanks subject to subpart Ka or 3 tanks requiring fill/refill records.

## B

- 11 **Table B.5 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Kb Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[1]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H )**  **(I)**
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for**  **SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**for the Model Refinery per**  **year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Manageria**

**l Hours (hr/yr)**  **C lerical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr (F=E)**  **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read Instruction 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Required Activities One

- Time Only Require me nts 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Notification of Start of Construction Notification of Actual Startup 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Physical or Operational Changes N/A
Notification of Malfunction N/A Notification of Initial Inspection

IFR Internal Inspection 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EFR Gap Measure me nt 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Inspection Report IFR Internal Inspection Report 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EFR 2nd Seal Gap Measure me nt 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EFR 1st Seal Gap Measurement 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CVS Operating Plan Report 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

## B

- 12 **Table B.5 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Kb Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H )**  **(I)**
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for**  **SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per respondent**  **per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**for the Model Refinery per**  **year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Tot al Cost ($)** 

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr (F=E)**  **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** Repeat Require me nts

Internal IFR Inspection 12 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 Visual IFR Inspection 8 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 Report of IFR Failure 2 1 2 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Delay of Repair or Emptying for IFR 4 1 4 0 [2 ] 0 0 0 0 0
EFR 2nd Seal Gap Measure Report 8 1 8 22 [ 3 ] 176 176 8.8 17.6 16,317.66
EFR 1st Seal Gap Measure Report 12 1 12 4.4 [4 ] 52.8 52.8 2.64 5.28 4,895.30
Notification of Refill 2 1 2 4.4 [4 ] 8.8 8.8 0.44 0.88 815.88 Number of Responses 4.RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS
A.. Read Instructions 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.05 0.1 92.71 B. Gather and Record Information i. Vessel Volumes, Liquid Vapor Pressure, flares 8 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 ii. 113b(a) inspection 12 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 iii. 113b(b) gap measure me nt fo r Secondary Seal 12 1 **5** 22 [2 ] 110 110 5.5 11 10,198.54 iii. 113b(b) gap measure me nt fo r Primary Seal **5** 4.4 [4 ] 22 22 1.1 2.2 2,039.71 C. Develop Record System 10 1 0 0 0 D. Time to Enter Information

- CVS Parameter Records 2 52 2 0 [ 5 ] 0 0 0 0 0

## B

- 13 **Table B.5 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Kb Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H )**  **(I)**
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for**  **SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**for the Model Refinery per**  **year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr (F=E)**  **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** F. Train Personnel N/A G. Audits N/A **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper (Sum of Items 1 through 3)** 22,029 **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting** 0 **TOTAL Record Keeping (Sum of Items under 4.A and 4.B)** 12,331 [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate

. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rule making docket. [2] The model refinery does not have any IFR tanks subject to subpart Kb. [ 3 ] 22 external floating roof (EFR) tanks subject to Part 60, Subpart Kb. The SFI assumed 12 hours for an average of 2.5 EFR tanks, or about 5 hours per EFR. [4 ] This measure me nt occurs only once every 5 years, so the number should b e 1/5 of the number of occurrences for the secondary seal measure me nts. [5 ] Require me nt is for closed vent system and control device. Model refinery does not use closed vent system and control to com ply with subpart Kb.

## B

- 14 **Table B.6 Model Refin ery**  **– 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart G Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[1,2]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H )**  **(I)**
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
****

**hours per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Refinery No. of** 

**occurrences for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for the** **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01 /hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr** 

**(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read Instruction 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Required Activities One

- Time Only Require me nts 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Start of Construction Notification of Actual Startup 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Physical or Operational Changes N/A Notification of Malfunction N/A Notificatio n of Initial Inspection IFR Internal Inspection 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EFR Gap Measure me nt 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Inspection Report IFR Internal Inspection Report 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EFR 2nd Seal Gap Measure me nt 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EFR 1st Seal Gap Measurement 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CVS Operating Plan Report 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Repeat Require me nts Internal IFR Inspection 12 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 Visual IFR Inspection 8 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 Report of IFR Failure 2 1 2 0 [3] 0 0 0 0 0

## B

- 15 **Table B.6 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart G Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1,2]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H )**  **(I)**
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
****

**hours per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Refinery No. of** 

**occurrences for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for the** **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**

**(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** Notification of Delay of Repair or Emptying for IFR 4 1 4 0 [ 3 ] 0 0 0 0 0 EFR 2nd Seal Gap Measure Report 8 1 8 8 [4 ] 64 64 3.2 6.4 5,933.70 EFR 1st Seal Gap Measure Report 12 1 12 1.6 [4 ] 19.2 19.2 0.96 1.92 1,780.11 Notification of Refill 2 1 2 1.6 [4 ] 3.2 3.2 0.16 0.32 296.68 Number of Responses 4.RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS A.. Read Instructions 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.05 0.1 92.71 B. Gather and Record Information i. Vessel Volumes, Liquid Vapor Pressure, flares 8 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 ii. 113b(a) inspection 12 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 iii. 113b(b) gap measure me nt fo r Secondary Seal 12 1 5 8 [4 ] 40 40 2 4 3,708.56 iii. 113b(b) gap measure me nt fo r Primary Seal 5 1.6 [4 ] 8 8 0.4 0.8 741.71 C. Develop Record System 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D. Time to Enter Information

- CVS Parameter Records 2 52 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 F. Train Personnel N/A G. Audits N/A **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper (Sum of Items 1 through 3)** 8,010 **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting** 0 **TOTAL Record Keeping (Sum of Items under 4.A and 4.B)**  4,543 [1] Original Subpart G supporting statement was unavailable for the analysis; therefore, Subpart Kb was used to estimate the burden under Subpart G. [2] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate

. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rule making docket. [3] The model refinery has no IFR tanks subject to subpart G or CC. [4 ] 8 EFR's are subject to Subpart CC/Subpart G

- one gap measurement per year equates to 8 occurrences; one measure me nt every 5 years equates to 1.6 occurrences.

## B

- 16 **Table B.7 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart VV Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[1,2]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H )**  **(I)**

**Person**
**- hours per**  **occurrence for SFI (from**  **supporting statement)**  **No. of**

**occurrences per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for** **the Model Refinery**  **per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**
**(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 2. Survey and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read Instructions 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Required Activities 48 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Performance Test Report Repeat Performance Test Report 48 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. Create Information Included in 3B D. Gather Existing Information Included in 3E E. Write Report 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Sources Notification of Construction Notification of Reconstruction/ Modification 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Actual Startup 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Initial/Repeat Performance Test 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Sources Semiannual Report 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read Instructions Included in 3A B. Plan Activities Included in 4C C. Im plement Activities Included in 3B D. Develop Record System N/A E. Time to Enter Information Records of Operating Parameters 80 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

## B

- 17 **Table B.7 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart VV Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1,2]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H )**  **(I)**

**Person**
**- hours per**  **occurrence for SFI (from**  **supporting statement)**  **No. of**

**occurrences per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for**  **the Mo**  **del Refinery per**  **year Person** 
****

**hours for the Model**  **Refinery per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**
**(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)**
F. Train personnel N/A G. Audits N/A **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper** 0 **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting** 0 **TOTAL Record Keeping** 0 [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate

. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rule making docket. [2] All record keeping and reporting burden for Subpart VV is accounted for under Subpart CC.

## B

- 18 **Table B. 8**  **Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 6**  **1 , Subpart V Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[1,2]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H )**  **(I)**

**Person**
**- hours per**  **occurrence for SFI (from supporting statement)**  **No. of occurrences per respondent per year**  **(from supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for the** **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Tech nical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr** 
**(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 2. Survey and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read Instructions 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Required Activities 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Performance Test Reference Method 21/22 Tests 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Repeat Performance Test 20 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. Create Information See 3B D. Gather Existing Information See 3B E. Write Report 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Construction/ Reconstruction Notification of Anticipated Startup 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Actual Startup 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Initial Performance Test 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Report of Performance Test See 3B Application for Alternative 10 1 Initial Report 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Semiannual Report 30 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read Instructions See 3A B. Plan Activities See 4C C. Im plement Activities See 3B

## B

- 19 **Table B.8 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart V Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1,2]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H )**  **(I)**

**Person**
**- hours per**  **occurrence for SFI (from supporting statement)**  **No. of occurrences per respondent per year**  **(from supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for the** **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Manager ial** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**
**(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)**
D. Develop Record System N/A E. Time to Enter Information 1.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Records of startups, shutdown, malfunction, etc. Records of operating, parameters and emissions 0.1 365 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Records of leak detected 0.4 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F. Train personnel N/A G. Audits N/A **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper** 0 **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting** 0 **TOTAL Record Keeping** 0 [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate

. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rule making docket. [2] Pursuant to Subpart CC, since the model refinery is subject to CC and an Equipment Leak rule in Part 60 or Part 61, the f acility only complies with Subpart CC. All model process units subject to Subpart V are also subject to Subpart CC; therefore, the values for the Subpart V analysis are zero.

## B

- 20 **Table B.9 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart GGG Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[1,2]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**

**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for SFI (from**  **supporting statement)**  **No. of**

**occurrences per respondent per**  **year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours per** 

**respondent per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
 

** hours per** **occurrence applicable to**  **Mo del**  **Refinery No. of** 

**occurrences for the Model**  **Refiner y per**  **year Person** 
****

**hours for the Model**  **Refinery per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial**  **$121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** 1. APPLICATIONS (Not Applicable)
2. SURVEY AND STUDIES (Not Applicable) 3. REPORT REQUIREMENTS A. Read Instructions 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Required Activities Initial performance test 24 1 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Repeat performance test 24 1 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. Create Information (Included in 3B)
D. Gather Existing Information (Included in 3E)
E. Write Report Notification of construction or reconstruction 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of anticipated startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of initial performance test 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Report of performance test (Included in 3B) Semiannual work practice reports 8 2 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal for Reports 4. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS

## B

- 21 **Table B.9 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart GGG Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1,2]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**

**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for SFI (from**  **supporting statement)**  **No. of**

**occurrences per respondent per**  **year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours per** 

**respondent per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
 

** hours per** **occurrence applicable to**  **Mo del**  **Refinery No. of** 

**occurrences for the Model**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for** **the Model Refinery per**  **year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial**  **$121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)**
A. Read Instructions (Included in 3A) B. Plan Activities (Included in 3B) C. Im plement Activities (Included in 3B)
D. Develop Record System (Not Applicable)
E. Time to Enter Information Records of operating parameters 0.3 365 109.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
F. Train Personnel (Not Applicable) G. Audits (Not Applicable) Subtotal for Recordkeeping 5. Total Annual Labor Hours and Cost (rounded) **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper** 0 **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting** 0 **TOTAL Record Keeping** 0 [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate

. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rule making docket. [2] Burden analysis for Subpart GGG is zero since units at the model refinery are also subject to Subpart VV and are complying with Subpart GGG by complying with Subpart VV. Burden is accounted for in Subpart VV.

## B

- 22 **Table B.10 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart GGGa Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[1,2]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**

**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for SFI (from**  **supporting statement)**  **No. of**

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
****

**hours per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Refinery No. of** 

**occurrences for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**for the Model Refinery per**  **year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**

**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** 1. APPLICATIONS (Not Applicable)
2. SURVEY AND STUDIES (Not Applicable) 3. REPORT REQUIREMENTS A. Read Instructions 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Required Activities 0 0 0 0 Initial performance test 24 1 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Repeat performance test 24 1 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. Create Information (Included in 3B)
D. Gather Existing Information (Included in 3E)
E. Write Report Notification of construction or reconstruction 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of anticipated startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of initial performance test 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Report of performance test (Included in 3B) Semiannual work practice reports 8 2 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal for Reports 4. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS

## B

- 23 **Table B.10 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart GGGa Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1,2]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**

**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for**  **SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
****

**hours per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Refinery No. of** 

**occurrences for the**  **Mo de** **l Refinery per**  **year Person** 
**- hours** 

**for the Model Refinery per**  **year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**

**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** A. Read Instructions (Included in 3A) B. Plan Activities (Included in 3B) C. Im plement Activities (Included in 3B)
D. Develop Record System (Not Applicable)
E. Time to Enter Information Records of operating parameters at large refineries 0.4 365 148 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Records of operating parameters for small refineries 0.42 365 153 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

F. Train Personnel (Not Applicable) G. Audits (Not Applicable) Subtotal for Recordkeeping 5. Total Annual Labor Hours and Cost (rounded) **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper** 0 **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting** 0 **TOTAL Record Keeping** 0 [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate

. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rule making docket. [2] Burden analysis for Subpart GGG is zero since units at the model refinery are also subject to Subpart VV and are complying with Subpart GGG by complying with Subpart VV. Burden is accounted for in Subpart VV.

## B

- 24 **Table B .**  **11 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR**  **Pa rt 63, Subpart R Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[1]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**

**Person**
**- hours per**  **occurrence for SFI (from**  **supporting statement)**  **No. of**

**occurrences per respondent per**  **year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours**  **per**

**respondent per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
 

** hours per** **occurrence applicable**  **to Model Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours** **for the Mo**  **del Refinery**  **per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**
**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** 1. APPLICATIONS N/A N/A N/A 2. SURVEY AND STUDIES N/A N/A N/A 3. ACQUISITION, INSTALLATION, AND UTILIZATION OF TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS 4. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS A. Read Instructions 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Required Activities Initial performance test 175 1 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Repeat of performance test 175 1 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage tank seal/seal gap inspections tanks certification 16 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual testing certification of area source compliance status 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C. Create Information

------------------------ Included in 4B

---------------------------- D. Gather Existing Information

------------------------ Included in 4B

---------------------------- E. Write Report Notification of applicability 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of construction/reconstruction/modification 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of performance test 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of CEMS performance evaluation 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of area source compliance status 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Report of performance test

------------------------ Included in 4B

----------------------------

## B

- 25 **Table B .**  **11 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart R Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**

**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for**  **SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per respondent per**  **year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per respondent**  **per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
 

** hours per** **occurrence applicable to**  **Mo del**  **Refinery No. of** 

**occurrence s for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for** **the Model Refinery**  **per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial**  **$121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/** **hr**

**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** Semiannual compliance reports bulk terminals major sources 10 2 20 10 2 20 20 1 2 1,854.28 Semiannual compliance reports pipeline breakout major sources 8 2 16 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0 5. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS A. Read Instructions

------------------------ Included in 4A

------------------------ B. Plan Activities

------------------------ Included in 4B and 5C

--------------- C. Implement Activities Gasoline terminals: File cargo tank inspection records 0.5 26 13 0.50 26 13 13 0.65 1.3 1,205.28 Update cargo tank inspection records 6 1 6 6 1 6 6 0.3 0.6 556.28 Cross

- check cargo tank inspection file 6 26 156 6 26 156 156 7.8 15.6 14,463.38 Pipeline breakout stations

------------------------ Included in 4B

------------------------ D. Develop Record System 8 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E. Time to Enter Information Record equipment subject to visual inspection require me nts at pipeline breakout stations 1 1 1 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Record equipment leaks data at bulk terminals 0.1 4 0.4 0 [3] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Record equipment leaks data at pipeline breakout stations 0.1 12 1.2 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Record storage tank seal inspection results 1 1 1 0 [4] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Records of startups, shutdowns, malfunctions, etc. 1 4 4 1 4 4 4 0.2 0.4 370.86 Area source recordkeeping: 0.25 1.0 0.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F. Time to train personnel 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

## B

- 26 **Table B .**  **11 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart R Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**

**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for**  **SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per respondent per**  **year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per respondent**  **per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
 

** hours per** **occurrence applicable to**  **Mo del**  **Refinery No. of** 

**occurrence s for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for** **the Model Refinery**  **per year Techn** **ical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial**  **$121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr** 

**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** G. Time to adjust existing ways to comply with previously applicable requirements N/A N/A N/A
H. Time to transmit information ------------------------ Included in 5E

------------------------- I. Time for audits: N/A N/A N/A Bulk gasoline terminals 6 1 6 6 1 6 6 0.3 0.6 556.28 Pipeline breakout stations 4 1 4 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0 **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper (Semiannual Compliance Reports) 1,854**  **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting 0**  **TOTAL Record Keeping (Sum of All Items under 5) 17,152**  [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate

. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rule making docket. [2] Model refinery does not include a pipeline breakout station. [3] Model refinery is not required to comply with equipment leak requirements under Subpart R. [4] Model refinery is not required to comply with storage vessel requirements under Subpart R.

## B

- 27 **Table B.12 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart XX Supp**  **orting Statement Analysis [1,2]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**

**Person**
**- hours per**  **occurrence for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**per respondent**  **per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**for the Model Refinery per**  **year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr** **) Total Cost ($)** 

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**

**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 2. Survey and Studies N/A 3. Reporting requirements A. Read instructions 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Required activities Initial performance tests 60 1 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Repeat performance tests 60 0.2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monitoring of operations and equip me nt e See 4E C. Gather existing information See 3B and 4E D. Write Report Notification of compliance status 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of construction/modification 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of performance test 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reports of performance test results See 3B Operation and maintenance reports N/A Semiannual reports N/A Subtotal for Reporting Requirements 4. Recordkeeping require me nts A. Read instructions See 3A B. Plan activities See 3B C. Implement Activities See 3B

## B

- 28 **Table B.12 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart XX Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1,2]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**

**Person**
**- hours per**  **occurrence for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**per respondent**  **per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**for the Model Refinery per**  **year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Techn ical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr** 

**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** D. Develop record system N/A E. Time to enter and transmit information Records of startup, shutdown, malfunction 1.5 50 75 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0

Record of tank identification numbers 0.1 2,100 210 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Leak detection records of mo nthly control equipment inspections 0.1 12 1.2 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 F. Time to train personnel N/A G. Time for audits N/A Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper 0**  **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting 0**  **TOTAL Record Keeping 0**  [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate

. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rule making docket. [2] Burden analysis for Subpart XX is zero since units are complying with Subpart XX by complying with Subpart CC and burden is accounted for in Subpart CC analysis.

## B

- 29 **Table B.13 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Y Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[ 1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per respondent**  **per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for** **the Model Refinery**  **per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.0 1/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr** 

**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 2. Survey and Studies N/A 3. Acquisition, Installation, and Utilization of Technology and Systems N/A 4. Reporting Requirements A. Read instructions 8 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Required activities Performance test (Method 25A) 100 1 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Repeat of performance test 100 1 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Leak check 16 1 16 16 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 Vapor tightness test 8 1 8 8 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 C. Create information Included in 3B and 4E D. Gather existing information Included in 3B and 4E E. Write report Initial notification of applicability 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of compliance status Included in 3B Site

- specific test plan Included in 3B Notification of performance test 2 1 2 0 [3] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Report of HAP control Efficiency 8 1 8 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0 5. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read instructions 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Plan activities N/A C. Im plement activities 16 1 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 0

## B

- 30 **Table B.13 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Y Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per respondent**  **per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for** **the Model Refinery**  **per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**

**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** D. Develop record system 16 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E. Time to enter information 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.05 0.1 92.71 F. Time to transmit or disclose information 0.25 1 0.25 0.25 1 0.25 0.25 0.0125 0.025 23.18
G. Time for audits N/A **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper 0**  **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting 0**  **TOTAL Record Keeping (Sum of 5.E and 5.F)**  **116** [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate

. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rule making docket. [2] Marine terminal at model refinery not subject to require me nt. [3] One time performance test requirement.

## B

- 31 **Table B.14 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UU Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[1]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per respondent per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrence s for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for** **the Model Refinery per**  **year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial**  **$121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr** 
**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 2. Survey and Studies N/A 3. Acquisition, Installation, and Utilization of Technology and Systems 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. Reporting Requirements A. Read instructions 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Required activities Initial Performance test 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P erformance test 40 1 40 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Startup, shutdown, malfunction Plan 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Operating, maintenance, and mo nitoring plan 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C. Create information See 4B D. Gather existing information See 4B E. Write report Notification of construction/ reconstruction 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of special compliance requirements N/A Notification of performance test 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of compliance Status 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Extended compliance request N/A Report of performance test See 4B Semiannual co mp liance reports 10 2 20 10 2 20 20 1 2 1,854.28

## B

- 32 **Table B.14 Model Refinery**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UU Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **(J)**
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per**  **year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**per respondent per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Refinery**  **No. of**

**occurrence s for the**  **Mo del**  **Refinery per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for** **the Model Refinery per**  **year Techn** **ical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr Managerial**  **$121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr** 
**(C=AxB) (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** 5. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read instructions See 4A B. Plan activities See 4B C. Im plement activities See 4B D. Develop record system N/A E. Time to enter information Records of operations 1 52 52 1 52 52 52 2.6 5.2 4,821.13 F. Time to train personnel 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G. Time to adjust existing ways to comply with previously applicable requirements N/A
H. Time to transmit or disclose Information 0.25 1 0.25 0.25 1 0.25 0.25 0.0125 0.025 23.18 I. Time for audits N/A **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper (Semiannual Compliance Reports) 1,854**  **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting 0**  **TOTAL Record Keeping (Sum of 5.E, 5.F, and 5.H) 4,844**  [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate

. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rule making docket. [2] Performance test required for a significant process change

- assumed requirement was not applicable.

## Appendix C:

**Burden Estimation and Supporting Statement Analysis**

**– Model Chemical Plant** 

## C

- 1 **Table C**  **.1 Model Chemical Plant**

**– Summary of Potential Cost Savings Associated with** 

**Uniform Standard Electronic Semiannual Reporting** 
**RULE (A) Recordk**  **eeping (B) Reporting Under Existing Rules Via**  **Paper Methods** 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart NNN $858 $556 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Kb $528 $590 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart YY, SS, and TT $11,682 $1,669 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart G, H, and I (PV, EL, TR Only) $18,543 $6,305 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart G (SV Only) $501 $590 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart FFFF $18,728 $6,305 **Total $50,840**  **$16,014**
( C ) I nitial Electronic Start

-up Cost for Proposed Uniform Standards $2,685 (D ) Cost of Semiannual Electronic Reporting for proposed Uniform Standards $4,740 (E) Cost of A

nnual Electronic Reporting for proposed Uniform Standards $363 (F) Written to Electronic Reporting Burden Ratio (F=B/(D+2 E)) [1] 2.93 (G) Administrative Preparation for Electronic Data Entry

– management of log in information, etc. $834 (H) Additional Re

porting Requirement in Uniform Standards

- Cost to semiannually report daily and operating block averages, required in §65. 882 ( e). [ 2 ] $2,59 6 ( I) Proposed Uniform Standards Reporting Costs for Electronic Semiannual and Written Annual Reports (I=D+(E * F )+ G+H) [3] $9,235 (J) Potential Reporting Cost Savings Not Considering I nitial Electronic Startup Costs for Proposed Uniform Standards (J=B

- I) **$6,779** (K) Savings Percentage

- Reporting Cost Basis (K =J/B*100) **42%** (L) Savings Percentage

- Record Keeping and Reporting Cost Basis (L=J/(A+B)*100) **10%** [ 1 ] Burden for annual reports multiplied by two because these are required semiannually under most existing rules. This ratio provides a general conversion between burden for electronic and written reports. [ 2 ] Assumes 1 hour per process vent to upload data (14 process vents) entered twice a year for semiannual reporting for a total o f 28 technical hours. Managerial and clerical hours were assumed to be five and ten percent of the annual technical hourly requirement, respectively. Rates used are in Table 6 of memo. [ 3 ] Annual reports are required in written format, therefore the burden associated with electronic annual reports was converted to burden for written reports (E*F).

## C

- 2 **Table C.2**  **Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart NNN Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[1]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)** 

**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for SFI (from**  **supporting statement)**  **No. of**

**occurrences per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence applicable to**  **Mo del**  **Ch emical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Ch emical**  **Plant per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for** **the Model Ch** **emical Plant**  **per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr (F=E)**  **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 2. Survey and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read Instructions 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Required Activities Initial Performance Test Report 60 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Repeat Performance Test Report 60 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. Write Report Notification of Construction/Modification 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Actual Startup 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Initial Performance Test 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Semiannual Report 3 2 3 2 6 6 0.3 0.6 556.28 Total Annual Responses () 4. Recordkeeping Requirements Record of Operating Parameters for Control Devices 1 12 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Records of Operating Conditions Exceeding Last Performance Test 1 8 1 8 8 8 0.4 0.8 741.71 Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction, etc. 0.25 5 0.25 5 1.25 1.25 0.0625 0.125 115.89 **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper (Sum of Item 3.C) 556**  **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting 0**  **TOTAL Record Keeping (Sum of Item 4) 858**  [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate

. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rulemaking docket. [2] Assumed the model chemical plant currently complies with 40 CFR 60 Subpart NNN by maintaining a TRE greater than 8.0 thro ugh the use of two condensers and a scrubber. By 40 CFR 60.662(c)(4) each affected facility that has a total resource effectiveness index value greater than 8.0 is exempt from all provisions of this subpart except for 60.662 (standards), 60.664(d),(e),and(f ) (Test Methods and Procedures), and 60.665(h) and (l) (Record keeping and reporting). Records of operating parame ters are not inc luded in (h) or (l)

.

## C

- 3 **Table C.3**  **Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart RRR Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[1,2]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)** 

**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for SFI (from**  **supporting statement)**  **No. of**

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Ch** **emical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Ch emical**  **Plant per year Person** 
**- hours** 

**for the Model Ch** **emical Plant**  **per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Ho urs**  **(hr/yr) Clerical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 2. Survey and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read Instructions 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Required Activities 60 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Performance Test Report Repeat Performance Test Report 60 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. Write Report 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Construction/ Modification Notification of Actual Startup 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Initial Performance Test 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Semiannual Report 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Annual Responses () 4. Recordkeeping Requirements Record of Operating Parameters for Control Devices 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Records of Operating Conditions Exceeding Last Performance Test 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction, etc. 0.25 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

## C

-4

**Table C.3 Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart RRR Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1,2]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)** 

**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence for SFI (from**  **supporting statement)**  **No. of**

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Mo**  **del Ch** **emical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Ch emical**  **Plant per year Person** 
**- hours** 

**for the Model Ch** **emical Plant**  **per year Tec**  **hnical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper 0**  **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting 0**  **TOTAL Record Keeping 0**  [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate

. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rule making docket. [2] Process vent is subject to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart RRR; however, pursuant to 40 CFR 60.700(c)(5), VOC emissions from the process tank vent D285, shal l be considered in compliance with the provisions of Subpart RRR because the vent stream is routed to a distillation unit (C

- 650) s ubject to 40 CFR 60, Subpart NNN and has no other releases to the air except for a pressure relief valve. Therefore, all burden i s accounted for under Subpart NNN.

## C

- 5 **Table C.4**  **Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Kb Supporting Statement Analys**  **is [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)** 
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per**  **year Person** 
**- hours** 

**for the Model Chemical**  **Plant per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read I nstruction 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Required Activities One

- Time Only Requirements 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Start of Construction Notification of Actual Startup 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Physical or Operational Changes N/A Notification of Malfunction N/A Notification of I

nitial I nspection IFR I nternal I nspection 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EFR Gap Measurement 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial I nspection Report IFR I nternal I nspection Report 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EFR 2nd Seal Gap Measurement 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EFR 1st Seal Gap Measurement 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CVS Operating Plan Report 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Repeat Requirements Internal IFR I

nspection 12 1 12 0.2 [2] 2.4 2.4 0.12 0.24 66.75

## C

- 6 **Table C.4 Model Chemical Plant** 

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Kb Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)** 
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per**  **year Person** 
**- hours** 

**for the Model Chemical**  **Plant per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** Visual IFR I

nspection 8 1 8 1 8 8 0.4 0.8 222.51 Report of IFR Failure 2 1 2 0 [3] 0 0 0 0 0.00 Notification of Delay of Repair or Emptying for IFR 4 1 4 0 [3] 0 0 0 0 0.00 EFR 2nd Seal Gap Measure Report 8 1 8 1 [4] 8 8 0.4 0.8 222.51 EFR 1st Seal Gap Measure Report 12 1 12 0.2 [5] 2.4 2.4 0.12 0.24 66.75 Notification of Refill 2 1 2 0.2 [6] 0.4 0.4 0.02 0.04 11.13 Number of Responses 4.RECORDKEEPI

NG REQUIREMENTS A.. Read I

nstructions 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.05 0.1 27.81 B. Gather and Record Information i. Vessel Volumes, Liquid Vapor Pressure, flares 8 1 8 0 [7] 0 0 0 0 0 ii. 113b(a) inspection 12 1 12 1 [8] 12 12 0.6 1.2 333.77 iii. 113b(b) gap measurement for Secondary Seal 12 1 5 1 [9] 5 5 0.25 0.5 139.07 iii. 113b(b) gap measurement for Primary Seal 12 1 5 0.2 [5] 1 1 0.05 0.1 27.81 C. Develop Record System 10 1 0 D. Time to Enter I

nformation

- CVS Parameter Records 2 52 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
F. Train Personnel N/A N/A

. G. Audits N/A N/A

## C

- 7 **Table C.4 Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Kb**  **Supporting Statement Analysis (Cont.)**  **[1]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)** 
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per**  **year Person** 
**- hours** 

**for the Model Chemical**  **Plant per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)** 

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper (Sum of Repeat Requirements Under 3.B) 590**  **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting 0**  **TOTAL Record Keeping (Sum of Items 4.A and 4.B)**  **528** [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rulemaking docket. [2] Original supporting statement indicate 20% of IFRs will be inspected, because inspections are conducted every 5 years. To account for the inspections for the one IFR tank we have included 20% of total hours for an annual average. [3] Assumed no IFR failures at model facility. [4] One external floating roof (EFR) tank subject to Part 60, Subpart Kb. [5] This measurement occurs only once every 5 years, therefore, the occurrence rate is 1/5 the number of occurrences for the secondary seal measurement. [6] Assumed 20% per year wi ll do refill notification. [7] This burden estimate from the original supporting statement includes requirement in Kb provision in 60.115(b)(2) to keep a record of all periods of operation during which the flare pilot flame is absent. As none of the model chemical plant storage tanks are controlled with a closed vent system and flare to comply with §60.112b, the burden associ ated with complying with this provision does not apply. [8] This requirement is for IFR tanks. The original supporting statement indicated that the average facility has 12.5 tanks with 75% IFR or 12 hours for 9.4 tanks (1.3 hours per tank). The model chemical facility has 1 IFR subject to Kb. [9] Original supporting statement indicated average facility has 12.5 tanks of which 20% (2.5 tanks) are EFR, therefore, 3.2 hours per tank

- the model chemical plant has 1 Kb EFR, therefore, assumed 3.2 hours. Also assumed that 70% of the cost attributable to performing the gap measurements (so only 30% is associated with the record burden for this line item.)

## C

- 8 **Table C.5**  **Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart G Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[1,2]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)** 
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per year**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**for the Model Chemical**  **Plant per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**H ours**  **(hr/yr) Clerical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read I nstruction 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Required Activities One

- Time Only Requirements 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Start of Construction Notification of Actual Startup 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Physical or Operational Changes N/A Notification of Malfunction N/A Notification of I

nitial Inspection IFR I nternal I nspection 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EFR Gap Measurement 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial I nspection Report IFR I nternal I nspection Report 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EFR 2nd Seal Gap Measurement 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EFR 1st Seal Gap Measurement 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CVS Operating Plan Report 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Repeat Requirements Internal IFR I

nspection 12 1 12 0.2 [3] 2.4 2.4 0.12 0.24 66.75

## C

- 9 **Table C.5 Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart G Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1,2]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)** 
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per year**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**for the Model Chemical**  **Plant per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** Visual IFR In spection 8 1 8 1 8 8 0.4 0.8 222.51 Report of IFR Failure 2 1 2 0 [4] 0 0 0 0 0.00 Notification of Delay of Repair or Emptying for IFR 4 1 0 0 [4] 0 0 0 0 0.00 EFR 2nd Seal Gap Measure Report 8 1 8 1 [5] 8 8 0.4 0.8 222.51 EFR 1st Seal Gap Measure Report 12 1 12 0.2 [6] 2.4 2.4 0.12 0.24 66.75 Notification of Refill 2 1 2 0.2 [7] 0.4 0.4 0.02 0.04 11.13 Number of Responses 4.RECORDKEEPI

NG REQUIREMENTS A.. Read I

nstructions 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 B. Gather and Record Information i. Vessel Volumes, Liquid Vapor Pressure, flares 8 1 8 0 [8] 0 0 0 0 0.00 ii. 113b(a) inspection 12 1 12 1 [9] 12 12 0.6 1.2 333.77 iii. 113b(b) gap measurement for Secondary Seal 12 1 5 1 [10] 5 5 0.25 0.5 139.07 iii. 113b(b) gap measurement for Primary Seal 12 1 5 0.2 [6] 1 1 0.05 0.1 27.81 C. Develop Record System 10 1 0 D. Time to Enter I

nformation

- CVS Parameter Records 2 52 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
F. Train Personnel N/A N/A

. G. Audits N/A N/A

## C

- 10 **Table C.5 Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart G Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1,2]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)** 
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per year**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**for the Model Chemical**  **Plant per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper (Sum of Repeat Requirements Under 3.B) 590**  **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting 0**  **TOTAL Record Keeping (Sum of Items 4.A and 4.B) 501**  [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rulemaking docket. [2] Original Subpart G supporting statement was unavai lable for the analysis; therefore, Subpart Kb was used to estimate the burden under Subpart G

. [3] Original supporting statement indicate 20% of IFRs will be inspected, because inspections are conducted every 5 years. To account for the inspections for the one IFR tank we have included 20% of total hours for an annual average. [4] Assumed no IFR failures at model facility. [5] One external floating roof (EFR) tank subject to Part 60, Subpart G. [6] This measurement occurs only once every 5 years, therefore, the occurrence rate is 1/5 the number of occurrences for the secondary seal measurement. [7] Assumed 20% per year will do refill notification. [8] This burden estimate from the original supporting statement includes requirement in Kb provision in 60.115(b)(2) to keep a record of all periods of operation during which the flare pilot flame is absent. As none of the model chemical plant storage tanks are controlled with a closed vent system and flare to comply with § 60.112b, the burden associated with complying with this provision does not apply. [9] This requirement is for IFR tanks. The original supporting statement indicated that the average facility has 12.5 tanks with 75% IFR or 12 hours for 9.4 tanks (1.3 hours per tank). The model chemical facility has 1 IFR subject to Kb. [10] Original su

pporting statement indicated average facility has 12.5 tanks of which 20% (2.5 tanks) are EFR, therefore, 3.2 hours per tank

- the model chemical plant has 1 Kb EFR, therefore, assumed 3.2 hours. Also assumed that 70% of the cost attributable to performing the gap measurements (so only 30% is associated with the record burden for this line item.)

## C

- 11

**Table C.6**  **Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YY, SS, and TT Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[1]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)** 
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per year**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**for the Model Chemical**  **Plant per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 2. Survey and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read I

nstructions Polycarbonated (PC) Production 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers (AMF) Production 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acetal Resins (AR) Production 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) Production 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Required Activities for PC, AMF, AR, & HF Included in 4C C. Create I

nformation for PC, AM F, AR, & HF Included in 4C D. Gather existing information for PC, AMF, AR & HF Included in 4C E. Write report i Initial requirements: notifications, initial compliance determination, performance tests

PC Production 52 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMF Production 52 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 52 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 52 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

## C

- 12

**Table C.6 Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YY, SS, and TT Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **per year**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**for the Model Chemical**  **Plant per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** ii Startup, Shutdown malfunction reports

PC Production 2 1 2 1 2 2 0.1 0.2 185.43 AMF Production 2 1 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 2 1 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 2 1 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 iii Periodic reports PC Production 8 2 8 2 16 16 0.8 1.6 1,483.42 AMF Production 8 2 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 8 2 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 8 2 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 iv Leak detection and repair (LDAR) reports PC Production 8 2 8 2 16 16 0.8 1.6 1,483.42 AMF Production 8 2 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 8 2 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 8 2 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 4. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read I

nstructions for PC Production 4 1 0 0 [3] 0 0 0 0 0 AMF Production 4 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 4 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0

## C

- 13

**Table C.6 Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YY, SS, and TT Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per**  **year Person** 
**- hours** 

**for the Model Chemical**  **Plant per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** HF Production 4 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 B. Plan Activities for PC Production 40 1 0 0 [3] 0 0 0 0 0 AMF Production 40 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 40 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 40 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 C. I mplement Activities i Material determinations PC Production N/A N/A AMF Production N/A N/A AR Production N/A N/A HF Production N/A N/A ii Control equipment inspection a. Tanks PC Production N/A N/A AMF Production 2 12 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 2 12 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production N/A N/A b. Closed

-vent system PC Production 2 2 2 2 4 4 0.2 0.4 370.86 AMF Production 2 2 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0

## C

- 14

**Table C.6 Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YY, SS, and TT Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per**  **year Person** 
**- hours** 

**for the Model Chemical**  **Plant per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** AR Production 2 2 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 2 2 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 iii Control equipment leak monitoring a. Cover vented to control device PC Production 1 2 0 0 [4] 0 0 0 0 0 AMF Production 1 2 0 0 [2,4] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 1 2 0 0 [2,4] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 1 2 0 0 [2,4] 0 0 0 0 0 b. Closed

-vent system PC Production 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 AMF Production 1 2 0 [2] 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 1 2 0 [2] 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 1 2 0 [2] 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 iv. Control devices a. I nitial requirements design analysis, performance Test PC Production 80 1 0 0 [3] 0 0 0 0 0 AMF Production 80 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 80 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 80 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0

## C

- 15

**Table C.6 Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YY, SS, and TT Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per**  **year Person** 
**- hours** 

**for the Model Chemical**  **Plant per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** b. Operate and maintain CMS PC Production 8 12 8 12 96 96 4.8 9.6 8,900.54 AMF Production 8 12 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 8 12 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 8 12 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 v. LDAR Program a. I nitial requirement: Identify all effected streams PC Production 20 1 0 0 [3] 0 0 0 0 0 AMF Production 20 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 20 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 20 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 b. Perform monitoring/repairs

PC Production 1) I n-house 0.1 1,092 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2) Use of contractor support AMF Production 16 12 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 16 12 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 0.1 1,092 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 vi. Container vapor tightness certification

PC Production N/A N/A

## C

- 16

**Table C.6 Model Chemical Plant** 

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YY, SS, and TT Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per respondent**  **per year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per**  **year Person** 
**- hours** 

**for the Model Chemical**  **Plant per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerica l** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** AMF Production N/A N/A AR Production N/A N/A HF Production N/A N/A D. Develop Record System i. Develop startup, shutdown, malfunction plan PC Production 20 1 0 0 [3] 0 0 0 0 0 AMF Production 20 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 20 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 20 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 ii. Control equipment PC Production 16 1 0 0 [3] 0 0 0 0 0 AMF Production 16 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 16 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 16 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 iii. LDAR Program PC Production 40 1 0 0 [3] 0 0 0 0 0 AMF Production 40 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 40 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 40 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 E. Record I

nformation (all information required by standard)

## C

- 17

**Table C.6 Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YY, SS, and TT Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per**  **year Person** 
**- hours** 

**for the Model Chemical**  **Plant per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/** **yr) Managerial** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** i. I nitial requirements: cover design, control device design, and control equipment testing PC Production 17 1 0 0 [3] 0 0 0 0 0 AMF Production 17 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 17 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 17 1 0 0 [2,3] 0 0 0 0 0 ii. Control equipment inspection PC Production 1 2 1 2 2 2 0.1 0.2 185.43 AMF Production 1 2 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 1 2 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 1 2 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 iii. Control equipment monitoring

PC Production 1 52 0 0 [5] 0 0 0 0 0.00 AMF Production 1 52 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 1 52 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 1 52 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 iv. Control device CMS PC Production 1 12 1 12 12 12 0.6 1.2 1,112.57 AMF Production 1 12 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 1 12 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0

## C

- 18

**Table C.6 Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YY, SS, and TT Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per**  **year Person** 
**- hours** 

**for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** HF Production 1 12 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 v. LDAR program PC Production 0.02 1,092 1 2 2 2 0.1 0.2 185.43 AMF Production 2 12 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 2 12 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 0.02 1,092 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 F. Time to Train Personnel i. Material determination methods PC Production N/A N/A

AMF Production N/A N/A AR Production N/A N/A HF Production N/A N/A ii. Control equipment inspection and monitoring PC Production 8 1 1 8 8 8 0.4 0.8 741.71 AMF Production 8 1 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 8 1 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 HF Production 8 1 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 iii. LDAR program PC Production 2 1 2 1 2 2 0.1 0.2 185.43 AMF Production 2 1 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 AR Production 2 1 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0

## C

- 19

**Table C.6 Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YY, SS, and TT Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (C)**  **(D) (E)**  **(F) (G)**  **(H) (I)**  **Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per respondent**  **per year (from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per**  **year Person** 
**- hours** 

**for the Model Chemical**  **Plant per year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(F=E)** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** HF Production 2 1 0 0 [2] 0 0 0 0 0 iv. Container leak tight method PC Production N/A N/A

AMF Production N/A N/A AR Production N/A N/A HF Production N/A N/A Subtotal Labor Burden **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper (Sum of Items Under 3.E) 1,669**  **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting 0**  **TOTAL Record Keeping (Sum of Items From 4.C.ii.b to 4.F.iii)**  **11,682** [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rulemaking docket. [2] Process unit not applicable to model chemical plant. [3] One time requirement

. [4] Cover not applicable to model chemical plant. [5] There are no weekly control equipment monitoring for model chemical plant.

## C

- 20 **Table C.7**  **Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart FFFF Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[1]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (D)**  **(E) (F)**  **(G) (H)**  **(I) (J)**  **Person**
  ** hours per** **occurrence for SFI**  **(from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
****

**hours per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the**  **Model Chemical**  **Plant per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for the** **Model Chemical**  **Plant per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost**

**($) Technical**  **$83.01/hr Managerial**  **$121.38/hr Clerical**  **$36.35/hr (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements

a. Read rule and instructions 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b. Required Activities i. I nitial Performance Test

- process vents 480 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ii. I nitial Performance Test

- wastewater 160 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iii. I nitial CMS performance evaluation 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iv. Repeat Performance Test 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c. Create I

nformation Included in 3e d. Gather existing I

nformation Included in 3e e. Write Reports i. Notification of Construction/Reconstruction 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ii. Notification of Actual Startup 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iii. I nitial Notification 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iv. Emissions Averaging Plan 40 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v. Precompliance Report 40 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vii. Performance Test Notification 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 viii. Notification of I

nitial CMS performance evaluation 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ix. Notification of Compliance Status 0 0 0 0

## C

- 21

**Table C.7 Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart FFFF Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (D)**  **(E) (F)**  **(G) (H)**  **(I) (J)** 
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per**  **year (from**  **supporting statement)**  **Person**
 

** hours per** **occurrence applicable**  **to Model Chemical**  **Plant No. of** 

**occurrences for the**  **Model Chemical**  **Plant per year**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**for the Model Chemical**  **Plant per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **C lerical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost**

**($) Technical**  **$83.01/hr Managerial**  **$121.38/hr Clerical**  **$36.35/hr (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** a. With performance test 80 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b. W/O performance test 120 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x. Notification of Physical/ Operational Change 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 xi. Semiannual Summary Report a. No Deviations 8 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 b. Deviations 24 2 24 2 [2] 48 48 2.4 4.8 4,450.27 c. SS&M Report 8 2 8 2 16 16 0.8 1.6 1,483.42 d. LDAR Report 404 2 1 [3] 4 4 4 0.2 0.4 370.86 e. Emission Averaging report 20 2 20 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 4. Recordkeeping Requirements a. Read rule and instructions Included in 3e b. Plan Activities N/A c. I mplement Activities N/A d. Develop Record System 40 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e. Develop SS&M Plan 100 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f. Develop QA/QC Plan for CMS 40 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g. Time to train personnel 40 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h. Time to retrain/refresh personnel 16 1 16 1 16 16 0.8 1.6 1,483.42 i. Time to enter information i. Records of SS&M 1.5 52 1.5 52 78 78 3.9 7.8 7,231.69

## C

- 22

**Table C.7 Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart FFFF Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (D)**  **(E) (F)**  **(G) (H)**  **(I) (J)** 
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
****

**hours per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the**  **Model Chemical**  **Plant per year**  **Person**
**- hours** 

**for the Model Chemical**  **Plant per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost ($)**

**Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr**  **(G=F)** **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** ii. Records of CMS data a. Record of Continuously Monitored Parameters 1 365 1 12 12 12 0.6 1.2 1,112.57 b. Compile Data 24 2 24 2 48 48 2.4 4.8 4,450.27 c. Enter/verify I

nformation for Semiannual report 16 2 16 2 32 32 1.6 3.2 2,966.85 d. LDAR Included in 3e j. Calibration of CMS 16 1 16 1 16 16 0.8 1.6 1,483.42 **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper (Sum of Items Under 3.e.xi) 6,305**  **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting 0**  **TOTAL Record Keeping (Sum of Items 4.h through 4.j) 18,728**  [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rulemaking docket. [2] Assumed one deviation per semiannual report at model chemical plant. [3] Changed to 1 hour because Method 21 testing is counted in cost impacts and 1 hour per process unit should be adequate time to transmit the data from the analyzer to a computer.

## C

- 23 **Table C.8**  **Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart G, H, and I Supporting Statement Analysis**  **[1,2]**

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (D)**  **(E) (F)**  **(G) (H)**  **(I) (J)**  **Person**
  ** hours per** **occurrence for SFI**  **(from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
****

**hours per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the**  **Model Chemical**  **Plant per year**  **Person**
 

** hours for the** **Model Chemical**  **Plant per year**  **Technical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost**

**($) Technical**  **$83.01/hr Managerial**  **$121.38/hr Clerical**  **$36.35/hr (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** 1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements a. Read rule and instructions 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b. Required Activities i. I nitial Performance Test

- process vents 480 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ii. I nitial Performance Test

- wastewater 160 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iii. I nitial CMS performance evaluation 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iv. Repeat Performance Test 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c. Create I

nformation Included in 3e d. Gather existing I

nformation Included in 3e e. Write Reports i. Notification of Construction/Reconstruction 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ii. Notification of Actual Startup 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iii. I nitial Notification 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iv. Emissions Averaging Plan 40 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v. Precompliance Report 40 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vii. Performance Test Notification 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 viii. Notification of I

nitial CMS performance evaluation 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ix. Notification of Compliance Status 0 0 0 0

## C

- 24

**Table C.8 Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart G, H, and I Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1,2]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (D)**  **(E) (F)**  **(G) (H)**  **(I) (J)** 
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per**  **year Person** 
****

**hours for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per**  **year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**H ours**  **(hr/yr) Clerical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost**

**($) Technical**  **$83.01/hr Managerial**  **$121.38/hr Clerical**  **$36.35/hr (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** a. With performance test 80 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b. W/O performance test 120 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x. Notification of Physical/ Operational Change 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 xi. Semiannual Summary Report a. No Deviations 8 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 b. Deviations 24 2 24 2 [3] 48 48 2.4 4.8 4,450.27 c. SS&M Report 8 2 8 2 16 16 0.8 1.6 1,483.42 d. LDAR Report 404 2 1 [4] 4 4 4 0.2 0.4 370.86 e. Emission Averaging report 20 2 20 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 4. Recordkeeping Requirements a. Read rule and instructions Included in 3e b. Plan Activities N/A c. I mplement Activities N/A d. Develop Record System 40 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e. Develop SS&M Plan 100 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f. Develop QA/QC Plan for CMS 40 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g. Time to train personnel 40 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h. Time to retrain/refresh personnel 16 1 16 1 16 16 0.8 1.6 1,483.42 i. Time to enter information i. Records of SS&M 1.5 52 1.5 52 78 78 3.9 7.8 7,231.69

## C

- 25

**Table C.8 Model Chemical Plant**

**– 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart G, H, and I Supporting Statement Analysis**  **(Cont.) [1,2]** 

**Burden item (A)**  **(B) (D)**  **(E) (F)**  **(G) (H)**  **(I) (J)** 
**Person**
**- hours**  **per occurrence**  **for SFI (from supporting**  **statement) No. of** 

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(from supporting**  **statement) Person** 
**- hours** 

**per occurrence**  **applicable to Model**  **Chemical Plant**  **No. of**

**occurrences for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per**  **year Person** 
****

**hours for the Model**  **Chemical Plant per**  **year Technical** 

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Managerial**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Clerical**

**Hours (hr/yr)**  **Total Cost**

**($) Technical**  **$83.01/hr Managerial**  **$121.38/hr Clerical**  **$36.35/hr (G=F)**  **(H=G*0.05)** **(I=G*0.10)** ii. Records of CMS data a. Record of Continuously Monitored Parameters 1 365 1 10 10 10 0.5 1 927.14 b. Compile Data 24 2 24 2 48 48 2.4 4.8 4,450.27 c. Enter/verify I

nformation for Semiannual report 16 2 16 2 32 32 1.6 3.2 2,966.85 d. LDAR Included in 3e j. Calibration of CMS 16 1 16 1 16 16 0.8 1.6 1,483.42 **TOTAL with Paper Reporting Paper (Sum of Items Under 3.e.xi) 6,305**  **TOTAL with Electronic Reporting 0**  **TOTAL Record Keeping (Sum of Items 4.h through 4.j)**  **18,543** [1] The referenced supporting statement contains several footnotes associated with the original burden estimate. Please refer to the original supporting statement, included in the rulemaking docket. [2] Original Subpart G/H/I (HON) supporting statement was unavailable for the analysis; therefore, Subpart FFFF was used to e stimate the burden under Subpart G/H/I (HON). [3] Assumed one deviation per semiannual report at model chemical plant. [4] Changed to 1 hour because Method 21 testing is counted in cost impacts and 1 hour per process unit should be adequate time to transmit the data from the analyzer to a computer.

## Appendix D **: Electronic Reporting Cost Analysis** 

## D

- 1 **Table D**  **.1 Initial Start Up Cost for Electronic Reporting for the**  **Model Refiner y** 

**Em ission Source**  **(A) (B)**  **(C) (D)**  **(E) (F)**  **(G) (H)**  **TOTAL COST ($) Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr Co**  **unt of Occurrences**  **Per Facility Count of** 

**Applicable Data Elements**  **Count of Rules**

**Applicable to Em** **ission Source**  **Count of Data**

**Entry Records Hours Required** 

**to Enter Data Elem** **ents [1]**  **Technical**

**Hours Managerial** 

**Hours Clerical** 

**Hours**

**D=Ax(B+C) E=D/25**  **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** Transfer Operations [2] 2 10 4 28 1.12 1.12 0.06 0.11 104 Equipment Leaks [3] 16 19 3 352 14.1 14.1 0.70 1.41 1,305 Process Vents [4] 7 12 2 98 3.92 3.92 0.20 0.39 363 Storage Vessels [5] 48 12 5 816 32.6 32.6 1.63 3.26 3,026 Generic Data Elements [6] 16 9 0 144 5.76 5.76 0.29 0.58 534 **Total 5,3**  **33** [1] Assumed 25 data element entries per hour. [2] 2 transfer operations at model refinery (marine dock and loading terminal). Assumed 10 data elements

- control type, identification number, material loaded, capacity, annual amount of material loaded, and 5 other miscellaneous data elements. Assumed 4 applicable rules listed in Table [Insert Name of Rule Applicability Table 1]. [3] 16 process vents are subject to equipment leak standards at the model refinery. Assumed 19 data elements

- Count of pumps, compressors, agitators, pressure relief devices, sampling connection systems, open

- ended valves or lines, valves, connectors, instrumentation systems, and control devices; classification of equipment; location of equipment; control type for equipment; regulated material status; HAP/VOC; and 5 other miscellaneous data elements. Assumed 3 applicable rules listed in Table [insert name of Rule Applicability Table 1]. [4] 7 process vents are subject to process vent standards at the model refinery. Assumed 12 data elements

- control type, identification number, flow, concentration, TRE, description, regulated material status, and 5 other miscellaneous data elements. Assumed 2 applicable rules listed in Table [insert name of Rule Applicability Table 1]. [5] 48 tanks are subject to storage vessel requirements at the model refinery. Assumed 12 data elements

- size, orientation, materials being stored, installation date, control type, capacity, vapor pressure, and 5 other miscellaneous elements. Assumed 5 applicable rules listed in Table [insert name of Rule Applicability Table 1]. [6] 16 process units require generic data elements at the model refinery. Assumed 9 data elements

- facility contact name, address, phone number, facility type (process), and 5 other miscellaneous data elements.

## D

- 2 **Table D.2 Initial Start Up Cost for Electronic Reporting for the Model Chemical Plant**

**Em ission Source**  **(A) (B)**  **(C) (D)**  **(E) (F)**  **(G) (H)**  **TOTAL COST ($) Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr**  **Clerical $36.35/hr Count of**  **Occurrences Per Facility**  **Count of**

**Applicable Data**  **Elem ents**  **Count of**

**Rules Applicable to**  **Em ission**  **Source Count of Data** 

**Entry Records Hours Required to** 

**Enter Data Elem** **ents [**  **1] Technical** 

**Hours Managerial** 

**Hours Clerical** 

**Hours**

**D=Ax(B+C) E=D/25**  **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** Transfer Operations [2] 7 10 2 84 3.36 3.36 0.17 0.34 312 Equipment Leaks [3] 3 19 4 69 2.8 2.8 0.14 0.28 256 Process Vents [4] 14 12 4 224 8.96 8.96 0.45 0.90 831 Storage Vessels [5] 20 12 4 320 12.8 12.8 0.64 1.28 1,187 Generic Data Elements [6] 3 9 0 27 1.08 1.08 0.05 0.11 100 **Total 2,685**  [1] Assumed 25 data element entries per hour. [2] 7 transfer operations at model chemical plant. Assumed 10 data elements

- control type, identification number, material loaded, capacity, annual amount of material loaded, and 5 other miscellaneous data elements. Assumed 4 applicable rules listed in Ta ble [I nsert Name of Rule Applicability Table 1]. [3] 3 process vents are subject to equipment leak standards at model chemical plant. Assumed 19 data elements

- Count of pumps, compressors, agitators, pressure relief devices, sampling connection systems, open- ended valves or lines, valves, connectors, instrumentation systems, and control devices; classification of equipment; location of equipment; control type for equipment; regulated material status; HAP/VOC; and 5 other miscellaneous data elements. As sumed 3 applicable rules listed in Table [insert name of Rule Applicability Table 1]. [4] 14 process vents are subject to process vent standards at model chemical plant. Assumed 12 data elements

- control type, identification number, flow, concentration, TRE, description, regulated material status, and 5 other miscellaneous data elements. Assumed 2 applicable rules listed in Table [insert name of Rule Applicability Table 1]. [5] 20 tanks are subject to storage vessel requirements at model chemical plant. Assumed 12 data elements

- size, orientation, materials being stored, installation date, control type, capacity, vapor pressure, and 5 other miscellaneous elements. Assumed 5 applicable rules listed in Table [insert name of Rule Applicability Table 1]. [6] 3 process units require generic data elements at model chemical plant. Assumed 9 data elements

- facility contact name, address, phone number, facility type (process), and 5 other miscellaneous data elements.

## D

- 3 **Table D**  **. 3**  **Annual Cost for Electronic Reporting for the**  **Model Refinery**

**Data Element (A)**  **(B) (F)**  **(G) (H)**  **TOTAL COST ($) Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr**  **Data Elements to**  **be Entered Per Year**  **Total Hours**

**per Year [1]**  

### Technical

**Hours Managerial** 

**Hours Clerical** 

**Hours**

**B=A/25** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** 

### Inform**ation Required in the Annual Report Subpart I**  **[2]** 

### Inspection records Defect 5 0.2 0.2 0.01 0.02 18.54 Leak 5 0.2 0.2 0.01 0.02 18.54 Failure 5 0.2 0.2 0.01 0.02 18.54 Documentation of Emptying for: Defect 5 0.2 0.2 0.01 0.02 18.54 Leak 5 0.2 0.2 0.01 0.02 18.54 Failure 5 0.2 0.2 0.01 0.02 18.54 Documentation of Repair for: Defect 5 0.2 0.2 0.01 0.02 18.54 Leak 5 0.2 0.2 0.01 0.02 18.54 Failure 5 0.2 0.2 0.01 0.02 18.54 Estimate of Emissions from Floating Roof Landings 5 0.2 0.2 0.01 0.02 18.54 Estimate of Emission from Overfilling 5 0.2 0.2 0.01 0.02 18.54 Estimate of

Emissions from Pressure Vessel Defects 5 0.2 0.2 0.01 0.02 18.54 **Subpart I, Annual Subt otal**  **60 2.4**  **2.4 0.12**  **0.24 222.51**  **Subpart J [3]**  

### Process Unit Identification 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Count of Leaking Equipment Valves 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34

## D

-4 **Table D.3 Annual Cost for Electronic Reporting for the Model Refinery**  **(Cont.)**

**Data Element (A)**  **(B) (F)**  **(G) (H)**  **TOTAL COST ($) Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr**  **Data Elements to**  **be Entered Per Year**  **Total Hours**

**per Year [1]**  

### Technical

**Hours Managerial** 

**Hours Clerical** 

**Hours**

**B=A/25** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** Pumps 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Connectors 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Agitators 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Compressors 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Total Count of Valves Monitored 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Percent Leaking 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Total Count of Connectors Monitored 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Percent Leaking 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Count of Equipment not Repaired Valves 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Pumps 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Connectors 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Agitators 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Compressors 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Non

-repairable/Inaccessible 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Delay of Repair Report 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Results of M21 Test Post Release Test for G/V PRD 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Results of M21 Test for Compressors 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Results of M21 Test for OEL 16 0.64 0.64 0.032 0.064 59.34 Process vent Requirements 25 1 1 0.05 0.1 92.71 **Subpart J, Annual Subt otal**  **345 13.8**  **13.8 0.69**  **1.38 1,279.45**  **Subpart M**  **(Annual) There are no annual Subpart M reports.**  

### Inform**ation Required in the Semiannual**  **Report**

## D

- 5 **Table D.3 Annual Cost for Electronic Reporting for the Model Refinery**  **(Cont.)**

**Data Element (A)**  **(B) (F)**  **(G) (H)**  **TOTAL COST ($) Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr**  **Data Elements**  **to be Entered**  **Per Year Total Hours** 

**per Year [1]**  

### Technical

**Hours Managerial** 

**Hours Clerical** 

**Hours**

**B=A/25** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** **Subpart I [4]**  

### Storage Vessel ID 10 0.4 0.4 0.02 0.04 37.09 Date of Empty/Repair 10 0.4 0.4 0.02 0.04 37.09 Start Date Floating Roof Landing Does Not Meet 65.315(b)(1) 10 0.4 0.4 0.02 0.04 37.09 End Date Floating Roof Landing Does Not Meet 65.315(b)(1) 10 0.4 0.4 0.02 0.04 37.09 Inspection record for pressure vessels 10 0.4 0.4 0.02 0.04 37.09 **Subpart I, Sem** **iannual Subt**  **otal 50**  **2 2**  **0.1 0.2**  **185.43 Subpart J**  PRD Release [5] 

### PRD ID 160 6.4 6.4 0.32 0.64 593.37 Duration of PRD Release 160 6.4 6.4 0.32 0.64 593.37 Emissions from PRD Release 160 6.4 6.4 0.32 0.64 593.37 Compressor Leak [6] 

### Compressor ID 32 1.28 1.28 0.064 0.128 118.67 Number of days between Instrument Reading 32 1.28 1.28 0.064 0.128 118.67 OEL Leak (Cap and Plug) [6] 

### OEL ID 32 1.28 1.28 0.064 0.128 118.67 Number of days between Instrument Reading 32 1.28 1.28 0.064 0.128 118.67 OEL Release from Emergency Shutdown [6] 

### OEL ID 32 1.28 1.28 0.064 0.128 118.67 Number of Releases 32 1.28 1.28 0.064 0.128 118.67

## D

- 6 **Table D.3 Annual Cost for Electronic Reporting for the Model Refinery**  **(Cont.)**

**Data Element (A)**  **(B) (F)**  **(G) (H)**  **TOTAL COST ($) Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr**  **Data Elements to**  **be Entered Per Year**  **Total Hours**

**per Year [1]**  

### Technical

**Hours Managerial** 

**Hours Clerical** 

**Hours**

**B=A/25** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** Low Barrier Pressure Fluid [6] 

### Equipment ID 32 1.28 1.28 0.064 0.128 118.67 Number of Occurrences 32 1.28 1.28 0.064 0.128 118.67 **Subpart J, Sem** **iannual Subtotal**  **736 29.4**  **29.44 1.472**  **2.944 2,729.50**  **Subpart M** Process Vents [7] 

### Process Unit ID 140 5.6 5.6 0.28 0.56 519.20 Start/End Date of Reporting Period 140 5.6 5.6 0.28 0.56 519.20 Start/End Date of Exceedence (Above Emission Limit/Parameter) 140 5.6 5.6 0.28 0.56 519.20 Average Parameter or Emission During Exceedence 140 5.6 5.6 0.28 0.56 519.20 **Subpart M,**  **Sem iannual**  **Subt otal**  **560 22.4**  **22.4 1.12**  **2.24 2**  **, 076.79** 
**Log In/Out Time [8]**  

### Annual Report Storage Vessels 1.5 1.5 0.075 0.15 139.07 Equipment Leaks 1.5 1.5 0.075 0.15 139.07 Process Vents 1.5 1.5 0.075 0.15 139.07 **Login/Out Subt**  **otal (due to annual report)**  **4.5 4.5**  **0.225 0.45**  **417.21** Semi Annual Report Storage Vessels 3 3 0.1 5 0. 3 278.14 Equipment Leaks 3 3 0.1 5 0. 3 278.14 Process Vents 3 3 0.1 5 0. 3 278.14

## D

- 7 **Table D.3 Annual Cost for Electronic Reporting for the Model Refinery**  **(Cont.)**

**Data Element (A)**  **(B) (F)**  **(G) (H)**  **TOTAL COST ($) Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr**  **Data Elements to**  **be Entered Per Year**  **Total Hours**

**per Year [1]**  

### Technical

**Hours Managerial** 

**Hours Clerical** 

**Hours**

**B=A/25** **(G=F*0.05)** **(H=F*0.10)** **Login /Out Subt**  **otal (due to semiannual report)**  **9 9**  **0.45 0.9**  **834.43 Total Annual Hourly Reporting Requirement**  **83.5 83.5**  **4.2 8.4**  **7,745.33** [1] Assumed 25 data elements entered per hour. [2] Assumed 10% of 48 Tanks (approximately 5). [3] Assumed 1 instance for every process unit (16 process units). [4] Assumed 10% of 48 Tanks (approximately 5) with data elements entered twice a year for semiannual reporting. [5] Assumed 5 releases per process units (16 process units) with data elements entered twice a year for semiannual reporting

. [6] Assumed 1 occurrence per process unit (16 process units) with data elements entered twice a year for semiannual reporting

. [7] Assumed 10 instances for every process vent (7 process vents) with data elements entered twice a year for semiannual reporting . [8] Assumed a general 1.5 hour period to log in and out of system for each report to account for administrative issues such as account and password.

## D

- 8 **Table D. 4**  **Annual Cost for Electronic Reporting for the Model Chemical Plant** 

**Data Element (A) Data**  **Elem ents to be**  **Entered Per Year**  **(B) Total Hours**

**per Year [1]**  **B=A/25 (F) Technical** 

**Hours (G)** 

**Managerial Hours**  **(G=F*0.05)** **(H)**

**Clerical Hours**  **(H=F*0.10)** **TOTAL COST ($) Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr**  **Information Required in the Annual Report**  **Subpart I [2]**  Inspection records Defect 2 0.08 0.08 0.004 0.008 7.42 Leak 2 0.08 0.08 0.004 0.008 7.42 Failure 2 0.08 0.08 0.004 0.008 7.42 Documentation of Emptying for: Defect 2 0.08 0.08 0.004 0.008 7.42 Leak 2 0.08 0.08 0.004 0.008 7.42 Failure 2 0.08 0.08 0.004 0.008 7.42 Documentation of Repair for: Defect 2 0.08 0.08 0.004 0.008 7.42 Leak 2 0.08 0.08 0.004 0.008 7.42 Failure 2 0.08 0.08 0.004 0.008 7.42 Estimate of Emissions from Floating Roof Landings 2 0.08 0.08 0.004 0.008 7.42 Estimate of Emission from Overfilling 2 0.08 0.08 0.004 0.008 7.42 Estimate of Emissions from Pressure Vessel Defects 2 0.08 0.08 0.004 0.008 7.42 **Total 24**  **0.96 0.96**  **0.048 0.096**  **89.01 Subpart J**  **[3]** Process Unit Identification 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Count of Leaking Equipment 3

## D

- 9 **Table D. 4**  **Annual Cost for Electronic Reporting for the Model Chemical Plant (Cont.)** 

**Data Element (A) Data**  **Elem ents to be**  **Entered Per Year (B)**  **Total Hours per Year**  **[1] B=A/25**  **(F) Technical**

**Hours (G)** 

**Managerial Hours**  **(G=F*0.05)** **(H)**

**Clerical Hours**  **(H=F*0.10)** **TOTAL COST ($) Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr** 

Valves 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Pumps 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Connectors 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Agitators 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Compressors 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Total Count of Valves Monitored 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Percent Leaking 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Total Count of Connectors Monitored 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Percent Leaking 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Count of Equipment not Repaired Valves 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Pumps 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Connectors 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Agitators 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Compressors 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Non

-repairable/I

naccessible 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Delay of Repair Report 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Results of M21 Test Post Release Test for G/V PRD 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Results of M21 Test for Compressors 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13 Results of M21 Test for OEL 3 0.12 0.12 0.006 0.012 11.13

## D

- 10 **Table D. 4**  **Annual Cost for Electronic Reporting for the Model Chemical Plant (Cont.)** 

**Data Element (A) Data**  **Elem ents to be**  **Entered Per Year**  **(B) Total Hours**

**per Year [1]**  **B=A/25 (F) Technical** 

**Hours (G)** 

**Managerial Hours**  **(G=F*0.05)** **(H)**

**Clerical Hours**  **(H=F*0.10)** **TOTAL COST ($) Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr**  Process vent Requirements 14 0.56 0.56 0.028 0.056 51.92 **Total 77**  **2.96 2.96**  **0.148 0.296**  **274.43 Subpart M**  **There are no annual Subpart M reports. Information Required in the**  **Semiannual Report**  **Subpart I [4]**  Storage Vessel ID 4 0.16 0.16 0.008 0.016 14.83 Date of Empty/Repair 4 0.16 0.16 0.008 0.016 14.83 Start Date Floating Roof Landing Does Not Meet 65.315(b)(1) 4 0.16 0.16 0.008 0.016 14.83 End Date Floating Roof Landing Does Not Meet 65.315(b)(1) 4 0.16 0.16 0.008 0.016 14.83 Inspection record for pressure vessels 4 0.16 0.16 0.008 0.016 14.83
**Total 20**  **0.8 0.8**  **0.04 0.08**  **74.17 Subpart J**  PRD Release [5] PRD ID 30 1.2 1.2 0.06 0.12 111.26 Duration of PRD Release 30 1.2 1.2 0.06 0.12 111.26 Emissions from PRD Release 30 1.2 1.2 0.06 0.12 111.26 Compressor Leak [6] Compressor ID 6 0.24 0.24 0.012 0.024 22.25 Number of days between I nstrument Reading 6 0.24 0.24 0.012 0.024 22.25
OEL Leak (Cap and Plug) [6] OEL ID 6 0.24 0.24 0.012 0.024 22.25

## D

- 11 **Table D. 4**  **Annual Cost for Electronic Reporting for the Model Chemical Plant (Cont.)** 

**Data Element (A) Data**  **Elem ents to be**  **Entered Per Year**  **(B) Total Hours**

**per Year [1]**  **B=A/25 (F)** 

**Technical Hours**  **(G)**

**Managerial Hours**  **(G=F*0.05)** **(H)**

**Clerical Hours**  **(H=F*0.10)** **TOTAL COST ($) Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr**  Number of days between I nstrument Reading 6 0.24 0.24 0.012 0.024 22.25
OEL Release from Emergency Shutdown [6] OEL ID 6 0.24 0.24 0.012 0.024 22.25 Number of Releases 6 0.24 0.24 0.012 0.024 22.25
Low Barrier Pressure Fluid [6] Equipment ID 6 0.24 0.24 0.012 0.024 22.25 Number of Occurrences 6 0.24 0.24 0.012 0.024 22.25 **Total 138**  **5.5 5.52**  **0.276 0.552**  **511.78 Subpart M**  Process Vents [7] Process Unit ID 280 11.2 11.2 0.56 1.12 1,038.40 Start/End Date of Reporting Period 280 11.2 11.2 0.56 1.12 1,038.40 Start/End Date of Exceedence (Above Emission Limit/Parameter) 280 11.2 11.2 0.56 1.12 1,038.40 Average Parameter or Emission During Exceedence 280 11.2 11.2 0.56 1.12 1,038.40 **Total 1120**  **44.8 44.8**  **2.24 4.48**  **4153.59 Log In/Out Time**  **[8]** Annual Report Storage Vessels 1.5 1.5 0.075 0.15 139.07 Equipment Leaks 1.5 1.5 0.075 0.15 139.07 Process Vents 1.5 1.5 0.075 0.15 139.07

## D

- 12 **Table D. 4**  **Annual Cost for Electronic Reporting for the Model Chemical Plant (Cont.)** 

**Data Element (A) Data Elements**  **to be Entered Per Year**  **(B) Total Hours per**

**Year [1]**  **B=A/25 (F) Technical** 

**Hours (G)** 

**Managerial Hours**  **(G=F*0.05)** **(H)**

**Clerical Hours**  **(H=F*0.10)** **TOTAL COST ($) Technical $83.01/hr**  **Managerial $121.38/hr Clerical $36.35/hr** 
**Login/Out Subtotal (due to annual report) 4.5**  **4.5 0.225**  **0.45** 

### 417.21 Semi Annual Report Storage Vessels 3 3 0.15 0.3 278.14 Equipment Leaks 3 3 0.15 0.3 278.14 Process Vents 3 3 0.15 0.3 278.14 **Login/Out Subtotal (due to semiannual report) 9**  **9 0.45**  **0.9 834.43**  **Total Annual Hourly Reporting Requirement 68.5**  **68.5 3.4**  **6.9 6,354.62**  [1] Assumed 25 data elements entered per hour. [2] Assumed 10% of 20 Tanks. [3] Assumed 1 instance for every process unit (3 process units). [4] Assumed 10% of 20 Tanks with data elements entered twice a year for semiannual reporting. [5] Assumed 5 releases per process unit (3 process units) with data elements entered twice a year for semiannual reporting [6] Assumed 1 occurrence per process unit (3 process units) with data elements entered twice a year for semiannual reporting [7] Assumed 10 instances for every process vent (14 process vents) with data elements entered twice a year for semiannual reporting [8] Assumed a general 1.5 hour period to log in and out of system for each report to account for administrative issues such as account and password.