October 1, 2015

 Exemption No. 11575A

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA−2015−0353

Ms. Yoshino Sugita

Ikust LLC

17077 Texas Avenue

Webster, TX 77598

Dear Ms. Sugita:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter posted to the public docket on July 13, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) on behalf of Ikust LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an 

amendment to your current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 

61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data 

collection. You requested an amendment to add the DJI Phantom 3 and DJI Inspire aircrafts.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. The 

unmanned aircraft authorized in the original grant are comparable in type, size, weight, speed 

and operating capabilities to those in this petition.

Airworthiness Certification

In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112−95 in 

reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited 

operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation 
2

has determined that this aircraft meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA 

finds that relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, 

Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates, and any associated noise certification and testing 

requirements of part 36, is not necessary.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 11575 

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to add new aircraft to its UAS operations.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 11575 remain in effect except 

as follows. Condition No. 1 has been updated to reflect the additional aircraft. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Phantom 2 

Vision+, DJI Phantom 3, and DJI Inspire when weighing less than 55 pounds 

including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new 

petition or a petition to amend this exemption.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
7/14/2015 Regulations.gov ­ Other Document

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA­2015­0353­0004 1/2

Ikust LLC - Additional Information

This Other document was issued by the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA)

For related information, Open Docket Folder

Content

Docket No: FAA­2015­0353

Ikust LLC

Request to add the following fleets in operations:

DJI Phantom 3

DJI Inspire

Thanks.

Ikust LLC

Comment Period Closed

ID: FAA­2015­0353­0004

Document Information

Date Posted:

Jul 13, 2015

Show More Details

Submitter Information

Submitter Name:

Anonymous

Comments

0

Docket Information

This document is contained in

FAA­2015­0353

Related Dockets:

None

Related RINs:

None

Related Documents:

This count refers to the total

comment/submissions received on

this document, as of 11:59 PM

yesterday. Note: Agencies review

Comments Received*

U.S. DOT/FAA ­ Decision

Ikust LLC, Yoshino Sugita ­

Exemption/Rulemaking

Ikust LLC ­

Exemption/Rulemaking

*
7/14/2015 Regulations.gov ­ Other Document

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA­2015­0353­0004 2/2

all submissions, however some

agencies may choose to redact, or

withhold, certain submissions (or

portions thereof) such as those

containing private or proprietary

information, inappropriate

language, or duplicate/near

duplicate examples of a mass­mail

campaign. This can result in

discrepancies between this count

and those displayed when

conducting searches on the Public

Submission document type. For

specific information about an

agency’s public submission policy,

refer to its website or the Federal

Register document.