Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 15

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION II

No. CR-22-406

TODD MICHAEL WINTERS

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered January 18, 2023

APPEAL FROM THE BRADLEY

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. 06CR-17-69]

HONORABLE CREWS PURYEAR, 

JUDGE

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW 

GRANTED

MIKE MURPHY, Judge

The Bradley County Circuit Court revoked Todd Winters’s suspended imposition of 

sentence and sentenced him to three years’ imprisonment. Pursuant to Arkansas Supreme 

Court Rule 4-3(k) and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), appellant’s counsel has filed 

a motion to withdraw stating that there is no merit to an appeal. The motion is accompanied 

by a brief in which counsel explains why there is nothing in the record that would support 

an appeal. The clerk of this court served appellant with a copy of counsel’s brief and notified 

him of his right to file a pro se statement of points for reversal within thirty days, but he has 

not done so. We affirm the revocation and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Appellant Todd Winters entered a plea of guilty to commercial burglary and theft of 

property as reflected in a sentencing order entered on March 5, 2018. He was sentenced to 
2

six years of probation, but he later violated that probation and was resentenced to two years 

in the community corrections center and four years’ suspended imposition of sentence. 

On July 12, 2020, the State filed a petition to revoke appellant’s suspended sentence 

alleging that he had violated the conditions thereof by obtaining new charges, including 

assault on a family member, two counts of third-degree battery, and third-degree assault. A 

revocation hearing was held on May 3, 2021. The State presented no witnesses but entered 

certified copies of convictions for assault and battery without objection. Winters called two 

witnesses. The first witness was his brother, who said that he had helped Winters get a job 

and he has witnessed Winters making progress in his anger management. He said sending 

Winters back to prison would be a setback. The second witness was a caseworker advocate 

with Immerse Arkansas. She stated that she had been working with Winters helping him 

apply for jobs, apply for benefits, and enroll in barber school. After hearing the evidence, the 

court found by a preponderance of the evidence that Winters had violated the terms and 

conditions of his probation. Instead of sentencing Winters, however, the court held the 

sentence in abeyance to allow Winters to take anger-management counseling. It set the 

sentencing hearing four months out and left the record open. 

Winters failed to appear at the September 8 hearing. It was rescheduled to December 

6. At the December 6 hearing, Winters testified he had completed anger-management

counseling but could not provide proof and that he had missed his last court date because 

he had been walking to court. On cross-examination, he admitted that his brother’s girlfriend 

accused him of chasing her with a knife; that he had pleaded guilty to third-degree assault 
3

on July 1, 2020; and that he had pleaded guilty to two counts of third-degree battery and 

assault on a family member on March 17, 2021. The court sentenced Winters to three years 

in the Arkansas Department of Correction. 

In a no-merit brief, counsel is required to list each ruling adverse to the defendant 

and explain why it does not present a meritorious ground for reversal. Eads v. State, 74 Ark. 

App. 363, 365, 47 S.W.3d 918, 919 (2001). After a full examination of the proceedings, we 

are required to determine whether an appeal would be wholly frivolous. Tennant v. State, 

2014 Ark. App. 403, at 2, 439 S.W.3d 61, 63. Counsel identifies two rulings adverse to 

appellant in addition to the revocation decision. Counsel has addressed each adverse ruling, 

arguing that the rulings do not have merit and that evidence supported the circuit court’s 

decision to revoke Winters’s suspended imposition of sentence. We agree.

We first address whether the evidence was sufficient to support the revocation. To 

revoke probation, the State must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the 

defendant violated a condition of his or her suspended imposition of sentence. Green v. State, 

2010 Ark. App. 174, at 4. The State needs to prove only one violation. Peals v. State, 2015 

Ark. App. 1, at 4, 453 S.W.3d 151, 154. Here, the undisputed evidence was that Winters 

obtained new charges while serving a suspended imposition of sentence, in violation of those 

terms. We hold that there would be no merit to an appeal of the sufficiency of the evidence 

supporting the revocation.

Nor did the court err in making the two additional adverse rulings against the 

appellant. The first was a motion to continue to produce a certain witness whom defense 
4

counsel thought the State was going to produce. The defense had not issued its own 

subpoena for the witness, and it was not erroneous for the court to deny the continuance. 

See Staggs v. State, 2021 Ark. App. 259, at 9 (“A lack of diligence alone is a sufficient basis to 

deny a motion for continuance.”). The second was a request by Winters to be sentenced to 

rehab instead of prison, but because his sentence was within the statutory range of 

punishment, the sentence was not an abuse of the court’s discretion. Pettigrew v. State, 2019 

Ark. App. 420. We affirm.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

GRUBER and BARRETT, JJ., agree.

Potts Law Office, by: Gary W. Potts, for appellant.

One brief only.