alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF  SYMETRICS  INDUSTRIES  INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER  31,  1996,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              34
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,717
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        972
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,004
<PP&E>                                           4,966
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,456
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,704
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           404
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,124
<SALES>                                         18,634
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,634
<CGS>                                           13,863  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    23
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  96 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,497  
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,030
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,466
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,466
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .91 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .91

        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8341

RONALD GARY, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

MS. BREWINGTON, RN; DOCTOR SHERMAN, MD; MR. DOIGHERTY, 

Director of Greenville County Detention Center; COUNTY OF 

GREENVILLE, 

 Defendants – Appellees, 

 and 

GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, 

 Defendant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Patrick Michael Duffy, District 

Judge. (4:06-cv-02216-PMD-TER) 

Submitted: July 13, 2009 Decided: July 21, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Ronald Gary, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., CHAPMAN, 

HARTER & GROVES, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

2 
3 

PER CURIAM: 

Ronald Gary appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gary v. 

Brewington, No. 4:06-cv-02216-PMD-TER (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2008). 

We deny Gary’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         December 4-5, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 AM to 5:00 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Robert H. Stretch, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E01, MSC 7510, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6912.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 25, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-28111 Filed 11-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              7
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      11,207
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                    43
<MORTGAGE>                                    62
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                            12,282
<CASH>                                     1,264
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       212
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            15,683
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            0
<POLICY-OTHER>                            12,072
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                   14
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 1,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              15,683
<PREMIUMS>                                     0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          632
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            22
<OTHER-INCOME>                               274
<BENEFITS>                                     0
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                   54
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         229
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              144
<INCOME-TAX>                                  46
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  98
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               3.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                               3.14
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        

</TABLE>
Order filed, April 29, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO S . 14

- 14

- 00258

- CR 14

- 14

- 00259

- CR

____________ MARIELA PONCE , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. 1370823 & 1370824



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due April 21, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the rep orter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Patricia Palmer , the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
#### Ex parte George MILLS.

No. 25562.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 24, 1951.

*No*attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from an order denying application for writ of habeas corpus and remanding relator to. the custody of the sheriff to be delivered to the proper agent for extradition.

Relator has filed certified affidavit stating that he does not desire to prosecute the appeal further and requesting that same be dismissed. The request is granted and the appeal is now dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3230 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 206
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3230

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 4, 2013

                    Received and read the first time

                            October 5, 2013

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   Making continuing appropriations during a Government shutdown to 
provide pay and allowances to members of the reserve components of the 
  Armed Forces who perform inactive-duty training during such period.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pay Our Guard and Reserve Act''.

SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR PAY AND ALLOWANCES FOR CERTAIN 
              RESERVE COMPONENT MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) In General.--There are hereby appropriated for fiscal year 
2014, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for 
any period during which interim or full-year appropriations for fiscal 
year 2014 are not in effect such sums as are necessary to provide pay 
and allowances to members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces 
(as named in section 10101 of title 10, United States Code) who perform 
inactive-duty training (as defined in section 101(d)(7) of such title) 
during such period.
    (b) Termination.--Appropriations and funds made available and 
authority granted pursuant to this section shall be available until 
whichever of the following first occurs: (1) the enactment into law of 
an appropriation (including a continuing appropriation) for any purpose 
for which amounts are made available in this section; (2) the enactment 
into law of the applicable regular or continuing appropriations 
resolution or other Act without any appropriation for such purpose; or 
(3) January 1, 2015.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 3, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 206

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3230

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   Making continuing appropriations during a Government shutdown to 
provide pay and allowances to members of the reserve components of the 
  Armed Forces who perform inactive-duty training during such period.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 5, 2013

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         151,379
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          82,071
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                80,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,091,939
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      2,218,950
<ALLOWANCE>                                     19,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,963,264
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,234,831
<SHORT-TERM>                                   147,471
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            254,332
<LONG-TERM>                                     63,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,018
<OTHER-SE>                                     243,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,963,264
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 39,551
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               15,180
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 3,762
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                58,493
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              26,759
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,573
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           28,920
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   1
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 98,567
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,324
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      18,346
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,346
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.99<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.88<F1>
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.37
<LOANS-NON>                                        583
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                19,414
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      250
<RECOVERIES>                                       165
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               19,329
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            19,329
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         19,329
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS THE CORPORATION'S BASIC AND DILUTED INCOME PER SHARE CALCULATED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NO. 128 "EARNINGS
PER SHARE".
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-22-00085-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

IN THE INTEREST OF J.M.B., R.P.B. III, I.V.B., CHILDREN

On appeal from the 214th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on its own motion. On July 14, 2022, the Court 

received a court reporter’s request for extension indicating that appellant has failed to 

request a reporter’s record and has not made arrangements for paying for the record. On 

July 15, 2022, the Clerk of the Court sent notice to appellant of that defect. On August 2, 

2022, we received appellant’s response indicating the reporter’s record has been 

requested and declarations of inability to pay filed with the trial court. The clerk’s record 

confirms appellant submitted a request for reporter’s record and declaration of inability to 
2

pay to the trial court. 

We now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further 

proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to 

be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

1. Whether appellant is indigent;

2. Whether appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to indigency; and

3. Whether appellant has been provided a complete copy of the appellate record.

If the trial court determines that appellant is indigent and entitled to a free appellate 

record, the trial court shall make any orders necessary to ensure appellant has the 

opportunity to fully examine the appellate record.

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any 

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental 

clerk’s record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter’s record 

of proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk’s record and supplemental 

reporter’s record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the 

expiration thirty days from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

18th day of August, 2022.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7572
ARTHUR F. PIGGOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM B. DORSEY; BAXTER BELL, Doctor, Jail Doctor, Williamsburg-James City County Jail; JAMES PAULK, Classification Officer, Williamsburg-James City County Jail, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-713-CV-2) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arthur F. Piggott, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order overruling Appellant's objections to payment of a partial filing fee and granting him an additional thirty days to raise the required fee. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S

O F T E X A S

N O

. P D

- 1 8 7 2

- 1 1

E X P A R T E J U A N C A R P I O

- C R U Z

, A p p e l l a n t

O N S T A T E ’ S P E T I T I O N F O R D I S C R E T I O N A R Y R E V I E W

F R O M T H E E I G H T H C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

E L P A S O C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m

.

O P I N I O N

P u r s u a n t t o a p l e a a g r e e m e n t

, t h e A p p e l l a n t p l e d g u i l t y i n 2 0 0 9 t o p o s s e s s i o n o f a

c o n t r o l l e d s u b s t a n c e

. T h e f o l l o w i n g y e a r

, h e f

i l e d a n a p p l i c a t i o n f

o r a w r i t o f h a b e a s c o r p u s

c l a i m i n g t h a t h i s c o u n s e l p r o v i d e d i n e f f e c t i v e a s s i s t a n c e b y f

a i l i n g t o a d v i s e h i m t h a t h i s

g u i l t y p l e a w o u l d r e s u l t i n d e p o r t a t i o n

. T h e t r i a l c o u r t g r a n t e d r e l i e f a n d t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s

a f f i r m e d

. E x p a r t e C a r

p i o

- C r u z

, N o

. 0 8

- 1 0

- 0 0 2 4 0

- C R ( T e x

. A p p

. — E l P a s o 2 0 1 1 )

. T h e S t a t e

h a s f i l e d a p e t i t i o n f

o r d i s c r e t i o n a r y r e v i e w c o n t e n d i n g t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s e r r e d i n h o l d i n g( 1 ) P a d i l l a v

. K e n t u c k y

, 5 5 9 U

. S

. 3 5 6 ( 2 0 1 0 )

, a p p l i e s r e t r o a c t i v e l y t o t h e c o l l a t e r a l r e v i e w o f

a s t a t e c o n v i c t i o n t h a t w a s f i n a l w h e n t h e P a d i l l a o p i n i o n w a s i s s u e d

, a n d ( 2 ) t h e C o u r t o f

A p p e a l s e r r e d i n h o l d i n g t h a t C a r p i o

- C r u z p l e a d e d a n d p r o v e d t h e p r e j u d i c e p r o n g o f

S t r i c k l a n d v

. W

a s h i n g t o n

, 4 6 6 U

. S

. 6 6 8 ( 1 9 8 4 )

.

T h e U

. S

. S u p r e m e C o u r t r e c e n t l y h e l d t h a t

, u n d e r T e a g u e v

. L a n e

, 4 8 9 U

. S

. 2 8 8

( 1 9 8 9 )

, P a d i l l a d o e s n o t h a v e r e t r o a c t i v e e f f e c t

. C h a i d e z v

. U

n i t e d S t a t e s

, 1 3 3 S

. C t

. 1 1 0 3

( 2 0 1 3 )

. T o d a y

, w e a d o p t e d t h a t C o u r t ’ s r e a s o n i n g a s a m a t t e r o f s t a t e l a w i n E x p a r t e D e L o s

R e y e s

, N o

. P D

- 1 4 5 7

- 1 1

,

_ _ S

. W

. 3 d

_ _ ( T e x

. C r i m

. A p p

. M a r c h 2 0

, 2 0 1 3 )

.

T h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s i n t h e i n s t a n t c a s e d i d n o t h a v e t h e b e n e f i t o f o u r o p i n i o n i n E

x

p a r t e D e L o s R e

y e s

. T h e r e f

o r e

, w e g r a n t t h e S t a t e ’ s p e t i t i o n f o r d i s c r e t i o n a r y r e v i e w

, v a c a t e

t h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s

, a n d r e m a n d t h i s c a s e t o t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s i n l i g h t

o f E x p a r t e D e L o s R e

y e s

.

D e l i v e r e d M a r c h 2 0

, 2 0 1 3

D o N o t P u b l i s h
#### The Wayne Building & Loan Co. *v.*Headley et al., Appellees; Ohio Bureau of Credits, Inc., Appellant.

(No. 28223

Decided October 9, 1940.)

*Mr. E. F. Mooneyham,*for appellees.

*Mr. Chester L. Dinsmore,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right he, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Turner, J., not participating.