alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To: File From: Elizabeth Kohl, DOE GC-71 Date: June 26, 2009 Re: Ex parte discussion on rare earth phosphors

On April 30, 2009, Mahima Gupta and Robert Carmichael of Navigant Consulting spoke via phone with Jeff Hogan, Sales Manager, AMR Performa nce Materials, a rare earth supplier. Ms. Gupta and Mr. Carmichael asked Mr. Hogan about th e supply of rare earth phosphors as it relates to the final rule for general service fluorescent and incandescent reflector lamps.

Mr. Hogan said that there is “more than adequate” rare earth in the ground physically, but that may not be so in terms of economically viable projects right now outside of China, which produces 92% of rare earths global ly. A few sites outside China had nearly started operations but have seen financing fall thr ough, and, coupled with the recent decline in rare earth prices, have not been able to restart. In general, he said it could cost $700-$800 million dollars from start-up to supplying rare earths. If all those plants were to co me online, then enough material would be available, but financing for those plants is an open question. Th e price of rare earths has to get higher to make that attractive for just rare earths. One problem is that miners need to find a home for everything they mine and refine, a nd with rare earths that’s going to be a lot of elements. Another question for prospective si tes is how China reacts with their monopolistic position. In terms of demand, they are seeing double digits increases in terbium demand annually. The environmental impact depends on where the mining is occurring and who is doing the mining.

As for prices, at 5-ton commerci al 99.99% purity levels, Mr. Hoga n said that terbium (Tb) is currently down drastically from last Septembe r at about $425 per kilo, from as high as $700; yttrium (Y) is about $7-to-$8 per kilo; and euro pium (Eu) has held fairly steady at around $500/kilo. Even higher purities of Y are can be $29-40/kilo, which are ne cessary for lamps.

End of conversation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    7
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000,000
                              
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                 Jun-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>              11,272
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                  0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                    0
<EQUITIES>                            68
<MORTGAGE>                            58
<REAL-ESTATE>                          0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                    12,555
<CASH>                             1,323
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                     0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>               264
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    16,405
<POLICY-LOSSES>                        0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                    0
<POLICY-OTHER>                    12,291
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                  0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                      229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                           15
<COMMON>                               1
<OTHER-SE>                         1,266
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      16,405
<PREMIUMS>                             0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                  410
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                     0
<OTHER-INCOME>                       195
<BENEFITS>                             0
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>           37
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                 160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       89
<INCOME-TAX>                          28
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                          61
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       1.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                       1.29
<RESERVE-OPEN>                         0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                    0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                      0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                     0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                       0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                        0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                0
                               

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(b)

              SECTION 1350 Certification (Chief Financial Officer)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Financial Corporation, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I Jerry L. Rexroad, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the Report.

This Certification is provided as of May 13, 2004.


                                              /s/ Jerry L. Rexroad
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Jerry L. Rexroad
                                              Executive Vice President and Chief
                                              Financial Officer


                                       32
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

139161 

ANTHONY DIXON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139161 

 COA: 289774 

WCAC: 2007-000244 

CHRYSLER L.L.C., f/k/a 

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 18, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                            STATE OF
                      SUBSIDIARY                          INCORPORATION
                      ----------                          -------------
<S>                                                       <C>
Getty Properties Corp.                                      Delaware
AOC Transport, Inc.                                         Delaware
Getty CT Leasing, Inc.                                      New York
Getty VA Leasing, Inc.                                      New York
Getty TM Corp.                                              Maryland
GettyMart Inc.                                              Delaware
Leemilt's Flatbush Avenue, Inc.                             New York
Leemilt's Petroleum, Inc.                                   New York
Slattery Group Inc.                                        New Jersey
Power Test Realty Company Limited Partnership*              New York
</Table>

*ninety-nine percent owned by the Company, representing the limited partner
units, and one percent owned by Getty Properties Corp., representing the general
partner interest.
Exhibit 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer Furnished

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief
Financial Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the Company).

This statement is being furnished in
connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|March 30, 2010 |  | /s/ Gary F. Hoskins    
|Dated          |  | Gary F. Hoskins        
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer

This statement is
authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Edward POSTEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 25364.

Court of Criminal Apeals of Texas.

June 6, 1951.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of rape. The penalty assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of fifty years.

Since perfecting his appeal to this court, appellant has filed a written motion, duly verified by his affidavit, requesting the dismissal thereof. The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive
Officer of American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. (the Company), that the
Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of
the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and the results of
operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

| |  |                                                       
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By: /s/ Kenneth H. Traub                              
| |  |                                                       
| |  | Kenneth H. Traub
President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 31, 2003
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**Gasel Transportation Set to ExecuteAggressive Growth Plan with New Credit Facility that Adds $1.5MM of Liquidity**.

 

05/19/2003 6:03 PM

 

Marietta, OH., May 19, 2003 —Gasel Transportation lines, Inc (OTCBB GSEL), a national long-distance and regionalhaul truckload common carrier, announced today that it had successfully closeda receivables-based line of credit agreement with Systran Financial ServicesCorporation, a division of Textron Financial Corporation that significantlyincreases the Company’s cash flow while reducing financing costs that willenable the Company to execute its previously announced aggressive acquisitionand growth strategy.

 

The Company utilizesreceivables-based lines of credit as an integral part of its financial structureto maintain liquidity and support operations and growth initiatives. The lineof credit agreement with Systran Financial supersedes the Company’s previouslines with an increase of $1.5MM of available credit from $2MM to $3.5MM atsignificantly lower cost. Administrative costs are reduced by 60% from 0.7% to0.3% while the interest rate on outstanding balances is set at 2 basis points(0.02%) over the prime rate.

 

“We are delighted that we havebeen able to significantly improve the terms of our receivables-based creditline and partner with Systran Financial. The increased cash flow and reduced administrative and borrowing costsenable us to continue to pursue acquisitions within our aggressive growthstrategy and should support increased shareholder value and interest from thepublic markets,” commented President & Chief Executive Officer, MichaelPost. “Furthermore, Systran allows us to maintain control over billing andcollections, which we feel will immediately and significantly reduce receivablesturnover by approximately ten days as compared to previous arrangements, andfurther boost cash flow while containing our credit risk exposure at any giventime.”

 

Gasel Transportation Tines,Inc., based in Marietta Ohio, with a terminal and sales offices in Columbus,Ohio, is a national long and regional haul truckload common and contractcarrier, and provides logistic services throughout the continental UnitedStates and Canada. For more information about Gasel, visit the company’s website at www.gasel.net.

 

This press release may makeforward-looking statements, which are subject to various uncertainties andrisks that could affect their outcome. Factors, which could cause or contributeto differences include, but are not limited to, economic conditions, productdemand and sales, competition and competitors’ actions, and changes in thetransportation industry. Please refer to the company’s 10-K, 10-Qs and otherSEC filings for a more detailed discussion of the risks.

 

For further information pleasecontact S. Gene Thompson, Chief Financial Offices, or Allan Blue, Director forGasel Transportation Lines, Inc., (740) 373-6479.

 

SOURCE Gasel TransportationLines, Inc.

 

----
EXHIBIT 11.1

                                INTERCARDIA, INC.

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                  (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Three Months Ended                        Nine Months Ended
                                                                 June 30,                                   June 30,
                                                  -------------------------------------      --------------------------------------
                                                        1998                 1997                  1998                  1997
                                                  ----------------     ----------------      ----------------      ----------------
<S>                                               <C>                  <C>                   <C>                   <C>              
Net loss per Unaudited Consolidated
   Statements of Operations                       $        (10,189)    $         (3,016)     $        (17,341)     $         (5,839)
                                                  ================     ================      ================      ================

Weighted average number of common
   shares and common share
   equivalents outstanding - basic and
   diluted                                               7,167,708            6,989,690             7,056,621             6,978,121
                                                  ================     ================      ================      ================

Net income (loss) per common share
   - basic                                        $          (1.42)    $          (0.43)     $          (2.46)     $          (0.84)
                                                  ================     ================      ================      ================

Net income (loss) per common share
   - diluted                                      $          (1.42)    $          (0.43)     $          (2.46)     $          (0.84)
                                                  ================     ================      ================      ================
</TABLE>





                                       19
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3215 

To amend the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 to suspend the salary 

of Members of Congress and deem Members of Congress as ‘‘non-essential’’ employees during a government shutdown. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2013 

Mr. GALLEGO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 to 

suspend the salary of Members of Congress and deem 

Members of Congress as ‘‘non-essential’’ employees during a government shutdown. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Shutdown Pay for 

5 Members of Congress Act of 2013’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3215 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF PAY FOR MEMBERS OF CON2 GRESS. 

3 Section 601(a)(2) of the Legislative Reorganization 

4 Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31) is amended by amending the 

5 section to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(C) Effective with the termination of a fiscal year 

7 at the end of which the U.S. House of Representatives 

8 and the U.S. Senate fail to reach agreement on govern9 ment spending, Members of Congress may not receive pay 

10 until a government spending agreement by the U.S. House 

11 of Representatives and U.S. Senate on future spending is 

12 agreed to.’’. 

13 SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF ESSENTIAL AND NON-ESSENTIAL 

14 FEDERAL EMPLOYEES. 

15 Consistent with the Constitution and the Anti-Defi16 ciency Act, 31 U.S.C. 1341, 1342, the Committee on 

17 House Administration is required to consider the following 

18 definitions for the legislative branch including: 

19 (1) ‘‘Employing authority’’ under House Rules 

20 where Members of Congress would be deemed ‘‘non21 essential’’. 

22 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

23 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

24 respect to any adjustment which, but for this Act, would 

25 otherwise become effective in the event of a lapse in approVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:59 Oct 02, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3215.IH H3215

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3215 IH

1 priations for government spending where the government 

2 would thereby shut down. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1990 464 pp.;Softcover SPE IVlono#raph Series Vol. 12 ISBN:978-1-55563-020-1 Society of Petroleum Engineers

’3ifi Cedific:~tee propagation models, propping agents and fracture conductivity, fracturing fluids and additives, Fluid leakoff, flow :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: behavior, proppant transport, treatment design, well completions, field implemeeta~ion, fracturing-pressure analysis Li~ Price USD 44~ Member Price USB 90

This monograph is a comprehensive reference book reflecting lechnological advances in hydraulic fracturing. Contents include predicel examples end illuetra~ive problems to demonetra~e specific applications of advanced lechnologies for Li~t Price ILISB ’1’15; students and experienced engineering professionals alike. Member Price USD 90 Chapt

....... ine pretreetment formeti ..... lueti ...... k mechani .... d fracture g .... ntry, 2D and 3D fraet .... postfracture formation evalustion, fracture azimuth and geom~ry determination, and economics of fracturing. .: ..................................................... .: 

## Other items in This Category List Price USB 148 Member Price LISI)



# HESI303124
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 23423.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 29, 1946.

W. W. Holland, of Houston, for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Cr. Dist. Atty., and E. T. Branch, Asst. Cr. Dist. Atty., both of Houston, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery by assault, and his punishment assessed at twenty-five years • confinement in the penitentiary.

 The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exceptions. In such condition nothing is presented for review. All matters of procedure appear regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF U.S. AUTOMOBILE ACCEPTANCE 1995-1,
INC., AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
10-Q
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,789,136
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,789,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,789,136
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,227,364)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (630,890)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>