alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 211 (Tuesday, October 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27878]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB 4 J2.
    Date: November 17, 2000.
    Time: 3 pm to 4 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 2 Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 6th Floor, 
Room #647, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: William E. Elzinga, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 647, 6707 Democracy 
Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600 
(301) 594-8895.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB-7 J3.
    Date: November 19-20, 2000.
    Time: 7:30 pm to 5 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Hotel, One Bethesda Metro Center, Bethesda, 
MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Lakshmanan Sankaran, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 659, 6707 Democracy 
Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600 
(301) 594-7799.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 19, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-27878 Filed 10-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT**

** **

I,David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association,the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, MotorolaDebenture-Backed Series 2002-14 Trust****(the “Trust”),certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Kin respect of the Trust and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports of the Trust filed by Lehman ABS Corporationin respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report of theTrust;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, the information in thosereports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the distribution informationrequired to be provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by theTrustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion insuch distribution reports is included in such reports; and

 

4.               I am responsible for reviewing the activitiesperformed by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreementand based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the Trustee hasfulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

 

 

Date:  July 22, 2009

 

 
| /s/ David Kolibachuk                 |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| David J. Kolibachuk,  Vice President |   |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp. (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 27, 2003


By:  /s/ LEO LIEBOWITZ
   -----------------------------------
Leo Liebowitz
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00101

- CR

EX PARTE JOHN D. FERR A RA
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Cameron County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021

- CCL

- 0205

JUDGMENT
The Court ’ s judgment issued on June 9, 2022, is here by withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor. THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
June 30 , 2022
## DEPT Of SERVEDJANUARY 29, 2010

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

INTHE MATTER OF PROSPECT AVIATION, CORP., Respondent. FAA DOCKETNO. CP09EA0022 (Civil Penalty Proceeding) DMS NO. FAA-2009-0732



### NOTICE OFHEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the hearing inthis case will be held on February 9,2010, beginning at 10:00 a.m., local time at the following location: Moorhead Federal Building 1000 Liberty Avenue Courtroom 1108 Pittsburgh, PA 15222

Please allow time to pass through security.

# ,Ja~ Administrative LawJudgeFAA Docket No. CP09EA0022 (Civil Penalty Action) CORRECTED SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1 

### ONE COpy Gregory C. Taylor, President Prospect Aviation Corporation, Respondent Beaver County Airport 145 Cessna Drive BeaverFalls, P A 15010 TEL: 724-843-3222 Layden C. Sadecky, Respondent's Counsel 664 Fourth Street Beaver, P A 15009 TEL: 724-774-6272 FAX: 724-774-6271 Christian L. Lewerenz, Complainant's Counsel Office ofActing Regional Counsel Eastern Region, EA-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3272 FAX: 718-995-5699 The HOJ;lorable Isaac D. Benkin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings,M-20 U.S. DepartmentofTransportation ·1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. East BuildiJ;lg Ground Floor, Room El2-320 Washington, DC 20590 TEL: Attomey202-366-0437 Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use.the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence A venue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WlOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. I
<PAGE>

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


The Board of Directors
Extendicare Health Services, Inc.:

On February 6, 2002 we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of
Extendicare Health Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December
31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2001, which are included in the Company's 2001 Annual
Report on Form 10-K. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned
consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related financial
statement schedule as listed in Item 14. The financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the financial statement schedule based on our audits.

In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

                                 [KPMG LLP LOGO]


Milwaukee, Wisconsin
February 6, 2002
<PAGE>

                           EXHIBIT 99.1 - SCHEDULE II

               EXTENDICARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           ADDITIONS            SUBTRACTIONS
                                                  --------------------------    ------------
                                                  PROVISIONS        FROM                          ACCOUNTS
                                    BALANCE AT    FOR LOSSES     ACQUISITION                    WRITTEN OFF      BALANCE
   ALLOWANCE FOR                     BEGINNING    ON ACCOUNTS        OR             FROM           NET OF         AT END
 DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS                   OF PERIOD    RECEIVABLE     DIVESTITURE     DIVESTITURE     RECOVERIES     OF PERIOD
-------------------                 ----------    -----------    -----------     -----------    ------------    ---------
<S>                                   <C>           <C>             <C>            <C>            <C>           <C>
Year ended December 31, 1997.......    9,303         8,111           8,326            --           6,814         18,926
Year ended December 31, 1998.......   18,926        12,698           4,683         2,724           7,684         25,899
Year ended December 31, 1999.......   25,899        11,905              --            --          12,855         24,949
Year ended December 31, 2000.......   24,949        17,945           2,367            --          28,932         16,329
Year ended December 31, 2001.......   16,329         8,945           3,515            --          14,212         14,577
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,382,096
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,382,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               494,568
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (24,581)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,581)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (24.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (24.58)
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHIRLEAN FANT RAND, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; 

DONALD J. TRUMP; UNKNOWN 

PARTIES, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 22-16257 

D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01220-DLR 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 10, 2023**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, McKEOWN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Shirlean Fant Rand appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing her action alleging various claims, including under the Federal Tort 

Claims Act (“FTCA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 18 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 22-16257 

de novo. Dugard v. United States, 835 F.3d 915, 918 (9th Cir. 2016) (dismissal of 

FTCA claim); Brown v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr., 554 F.3d 747, 749 (9th Cir. 2009) 

(dismissal under absolute immunity). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Rand’s claims against President Trump 

on the basis of absolute immunity. See Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 749-53

(1982) (explaining that a president is absolutely immune from “damages liability 

predicated on his official acts”).

The district court properly dismissed Rand’s FTCA claims because Rand 

failed to establish that she could state viable claims against a private individual 

under like circumstances under applicable state law. See Dugard, 835 F.3d at 918-

919 (the FTCA provides a limited waiver of the United States’ sovereign immunity 

where the government would be liable under analogous state law); Prescott v. 

United States, 973 F.2d 696, 701 (9th Cir. 1992) (“[P]laintiff bears the burden of 

persuading the court that it has subject matter jurisdiction under the FTCA’s 

general waiver of immunity.”); see also Love v United States, 60 F.3d 642, 644 

(9th Cir. 1995) (“The breach of a duty created by federal law is not, by itself, 

actionable under the FTCA.”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rand leave to 

amend because amendment would have been futile. See Cervantes v. Countrywide 

Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of 
3 22-16257 

review and stating that leave to amend may be denied where amendment would be 

futile).

We reject as unsupported by the record Rand’s contentions that she was 

entitled to a default judgment against defendants.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Superior Uniform Group, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Michael Benstock     
|Michael Benstock         
|Chief Executive Officer  
|                         
|/s/ Andrew D. Demott, Jr.
|Andrew D. Demott, Jr.    
|Chief Financial Officer  
|                         
|Date: May 9, 2006
#### SIMMONS v. STATE.

No. 23069.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 14, 1945.

T. D. Kimbrough, of Midland, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of selling whisky in a dry area and assessed the penalty by fine of three hundred dollars.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. There is nothing presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7770** 

DREW BRINSON, a/k/a Drew H. Brinson, a/k/a Drew Howard Brinson , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.

WARDEN M. RIVERA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 6:12

- cv - 02075

- DCN )

Submitted : February 28, 2013 Decided: March 15, 2013

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Drew Brinson , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Drew Brinson , a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court ’ s order accepting the rec ommendation of the magistrate judge and denyin g relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2012) p etition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brinson v. Rivera , No. 6:12

- cv - 02075

- DCN
(D.S.C. Oct. 1, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3129 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the full 

exclusion applicable to qualified small business stock. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2013 

Ms. MOORE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the full exclusion applicable to qualified small 

business stock. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT FULL EXCLUSION APPLICABLE TO 

4 QUALIFIED SMALL BUSINESS STOCK. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (4) of section 1202(a) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik7 ing ‘‘and before January 1, 2014’’. 

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

9 (1) Section 1202(a) of such Code, as amended 

10 by subsection (a), is amended by striking paragraphs 


EMCDONALD on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3129 IH

1 (2) and (3) and by redesignating paragraph (4) as 

2 paragraph (2). 

3 (2) Section 1202(a)(2) of such Code, as redes4 ignated by paragraph (1), is amended by adding 

5 ‘‘and’’ at the end of subparagraph (A), by striking 

6 subparagraph (B), and by redesignating subpara7 graph (C) as subparagraph (B). 

8 (3) Section 1223(13) of such Code is amended 

9 by striking ‘‘1202(a)(2),’’. 

10 (4) The heading for section 1202 of such Code 

11 is amended by striking ‘‘PARTIAL EXCLUSION

12 FOR GAIN’’ and inserting ‘‘EXCLUSION OF CER13 TAIN GAIN’’. 

14 (5) The item relating to section 1202 in the 

15 table of sections for part I of subchapter P of chap16 ter 1 of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘Partial 

17 exclusion for gain’’ and inserting ‘‘Exclusion of cer18 tain gain’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section apply to stock acquired after December 31, 

21 2013. 

Æ 


EMCDONALD on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
****

****

**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**



I, Douglas P. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer of Taylor Devices, Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Taylor
Devices, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) [omitted] for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) [NOT REQUIRED]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

|Date: January 13, 2004 | /s/ Douglas P. Taylor                    
|---------------------- | -----------------------------------------
|                       | Douglas P. Taylor Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32





Certifications
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





The
undersigned, who are the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer
of Synalloy Corporation, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge, the accompanying Form 10-Q of the issuer fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and that information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
issuer.











August 5, 2008
            
            s/Ronald H. BraamRonald
      H. Braam
              Chief
      Executive Officers/Gregory M. BowieGregory
      M. Bowie
              Vice
      President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer