alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7268

KENNETH L. HENDERSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD F. MOATS; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-97-

635-L)

Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 1, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth L. Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth L. Henderson seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Henderson v. Moats, No. CA-97-635-L

(D. Md. Aug. 16, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3060 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3060

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 232 Southwest Johnson Avenue in Burleson, Texas, as the ``Sergeant 
                 William Moody Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT WILLIAM MOODY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 232 Southwest Johnson Avenue in Burleson, Texas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sergeant William Moody Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
William Moody Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 24, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3060

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 232 Southwest Johnson Avenue in Burleson, Texas, as the ``Sergeant 
                 William Moody Post Office Building''.
```
THe STATer &f text* . ^

(AoTIpa) "Poa. CLERKS Recofcfr / ftcfbgiat RecofcS

To T&£ foocft.fc"SL£ SosTlcei Cfc JSkvb U>o*J\

CotAES rtou); ?*W1L iWoc* f A£p*lLI fro <*_ "u* <L-. fcUt*. s>fyfc-i

kv^jL aJOVaW^A ca*?ic- ©r «mAvod a-a! C'Acs *tV^ <vu>rw»* tor JttoeMntL

1.

"^ro dfie.1 Cdos ^V**~ "^* An^SCr^ tr is N*2e_ieJ- £>/ iv/i e.&acV»C- Li^Sfc. Df WfJtJ. . V.-Ur i/» NlortU (phoU* ^(04 0*^. ZU.,12-7 G<H()

IE.

\ \" i! * v^ ^^ ^^^ ^E*"s ^ t:> ^ f^0^ iv*. ^ i,wV

t°W\"-\ °^ L^ S^^ *^e\\«vV J>roa^. IV^ll^ A\rt-\aW^ i\JU -IVvc Vx«A CourV U^^ oA P»^e^| no- \>lbd.- H* ^^^Ot, ^ &jU*lly ^"(ei -U> "biDc-H-ioisio. iu^4>^r ^pJlftJt e^c^^ 1U. fcc^^l 4o ^CL«L

U\.ftfucs» l;^VA,>vi oi 0V Ok-lots'-
2SC.

{WU<Jc W Or:4U- V^ 1U T*wlv koX VrwWct 6U,k H

k/«JLi U TU^ Coo A Ce*WH- ft ) *> Aoauv-V IM. loir **1

bft^toorV 4^^ DcV. XI, 1o& ^ufS^-V W Toe.?-ft»p.fr. tM.U

Utt"Cit"PO^€ ^E^VS&S CDtZUb&LZb , -tU Af|>ell**A f>r<vfS "fUV

iU. &>0r^ CreA^T Ttas. (AoTio^ "Foe- /weULtfTE: £eco£4 p^l $u^oVroc^A^o^ *«A 4oT V»~r -U> \a*- ^>ev;k -Cre-*- "H—«- T^^i* Coo^y

LtNAjtrvV -£ov>A$ ^ TL*. fc*w©u-vT S^T 4-W lL<. Av**V. toi;rr' hgX..£-

£**<uAri o^> "tVJ* 1_ 4*y cA ^v^W ^ 1W ^*,r Z^IT.

a> -^ -^ k^ <A Zoi^ , L*^ 4o U. U-^ 1

<L« *^>JJawAx> fllolio^ "Foe, ileum'5 to.oe.fr /tePoeTeg-. g.ELp£h

Q^^Vvt-^- ^ftSI i-«-^V

T-oVT- ±
Court of Appeals

THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547

www.ixcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx

(512) 463-1733

JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK

DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE

BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE

MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE

SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE

CINDY OLSON B0URLAND, JUSTICE

Mr. Patrick Heaney

TDCJ ID #1987843

Dominguez Unit

6535 Cagnon Road

San Antonio, TX 78252

August 10,2015

RE: Court ofAppeals Number: 03-15-00470-CR

Trial Court Case Number: D-1 -DC-14-205206

Style: Patrick Heaney

v. The State ofTexas

Dear Mr. Heaney:

A

In response to your correspondence dated August 6,2015, please be advised that in all

criminal cases, the clerk and reporter must file the record in duplicate, and the record must be

retained by the trial court clerk. The trial court clerk is required to furnish a copy ofthe record if

Tcquestedby apro se litigant. See Tex. R. App. P^343(gXand 34.6(h). Appellant shouid make a

written request to the district clerk and send it to the following address:

Honorable Velva Price

Travis County District Clerk

P.O. Box 679003

Austin, Texas 78767-9003

Very truly yours,

JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK

BY: &. ,!%*&**

Liz Talerico, Deputy Clerk

cc: The Honorable Rosemary Lehmberg
Cos)A A A^eJtx cWk-

/Jo\*~-L>T l^ ~L.°uT

frlk,T^ ^ y^ /<ou^t. —

T

a J^-i «j v»y - /'bri'- - - — — "7

*flfr*AtT fr*_$*-.

NOV 0 5 2015

#*V X** rwW;,(lA jq.g>ii:z^
•si

0)

•si

HHw

in

•si

•si
Order entered April 4, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 11 - 01708 - CV HAL RACHAL, JR., Appellant V. LETKIEWICZ & FOSTER, Appellee On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR - 09 - 2413 - 2 

### O RDER We GRANT appellee’s April 2, 2013 third motion for an extension of time to file a brief. We ORDER the brief tendered to this Court by appellee on April 2, 2013 filed as of the date of this order.

We DENY appellee’s April 2, 2013 motio n to strike two documents in the appendix of appellant’s brief. The Court will consider only evidence that is properly before it. See Green v. Kaposta , 152 S.W.3d 839, 841 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2005, no pet.).

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64235-64236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27532]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on October 5, 2000, a proposed Consent 
Decree in United States v. Menard, Inc., et al. (E.D. Wisconsin), Civil 
Action No. 00-C-1323 was lodged with the United States District Court 
for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
    This Consent Decree represents a settlement of claims brought 
against defendants (``Settling Defendants'') in the above-referenced 
action under section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Recovery Act (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9607, to recover 
costs incurred by the United States in connection with the Fadrowski 
Drum Disposal Site in Franklin, Wisconsin (the ``Site''). The Settling 
Defendants are Menard, Inc., INX International Ink Company, Inc.; 
Briggs & Stratton Corporation; The Falk Corporation; Giddings & Lewis, 
LLC; AMSTED Industries, Incorporated; The Manitowoc Company, Inc.; 
Miller Brewing Company; Dresser Industries, Inc.; and Waukesha Engine 
Division, a Division of Dresser Equipment Group, Inc.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent 
Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to 
United

[[Page 64236]]

States v. Menard, Inc., et al. (E.D. Wisconsin), D.J. Ref. 90-11-2-809/
1.
    The Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United 
States Attorney, 517 East Wisconsin Avenue, Room 530, Milwaukee, 
Wisconsin 53202, and at U.S. EPA Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604. A copy of the Consent Decree may also be 
obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611. In requesting a copy, 
please enclose a check in the amount of $7.50 (25 cents per page 
reproduction cost), payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Bruce S. Gelber,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-27532 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-92-35-R)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Lawrence Nance, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Lawrence Nance appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to disallow collection of fees and restitution. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Nance, No. CR-92-35-R (W.D. Va.

July 1, 1998). We deny Nance’s motion for transcripts. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Panel Member Roster for**  **July 29**
**- July 31**  **, 201 4** 

**Meeting of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP)**  **on New High Throughput Methods to Estimate Chemical Exposure**  **Docket Number: EP** **A**
**- HQ** 
**- OPP** 
**- 201**  **4**
**- 0**  **331**
**FI FRA SAP**  **Session Chair**  **James L.**  **McManaman, Ph.D.** Professor and Chief Section of Basic Reproductive Sciences Department of Obstetrics and Gy necology and Physiology and Biophys ics University

of Colorado Denver Aurora, CO **Designated Federal Official Fred Jenkins, Jr., Ph.D.**  U

. S

. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Science Coordination and Policy FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel EPA East Building, MC 7201M 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460 Phone (202) 564

- 3327 Fax (202) 564

- 8382 jenkins.fred@epa.gov
**FI FRA Scientific Advisory Panel Members**  **Dana Barr, Ph.D.** Research Professor Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Rollins Schoo l of Public Health Emory University Atlanta , GA **Kenneth Delclos** , **Ph.D.** Research Pharmacologist Division of Biochemistry Toxicology National Center for Toxicological Research U.S. Food and Drug Administration Jefferson, AR**Marion Ehrich , Ph.D.**  **, D.A.B.T., A.T.S.** 

Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology Department of Biomedical Science and Pathobiology Virginia

- Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine Virginia Pol yt echnic Institute and State University Blacksburg , VA **David Jett, Ph.D.** Program Director National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke National Institute s of Health Bethesda, MD **FQ PA Science Review Board Members**  **James Chen , Ph.D.**  Senior Mathematical Statistician Division of Biometry

and Risk Assessment National Center for Toxicological Research U

. S

. Food and Drug Administration Jefferson , AR **Mark Cronin, Ph.D.** Professor of Predictive Toxicology School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences Liverpool John Moores University Liverpool, United Kingdom **Panagiotis Georgo poulos**  **, Ph.D.** Professor Exposure Science Division Environmental and Occup ation Health Sciences Institute Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Rutgers University Piscataway , NJ **William Hayton , Ph.D.**  Professor Emeritus Division of Environment Health Science College of Pharmacy , School of Medicine and Public Health Ohio State University Columbus , O H**Peter Mac d**  **onald D.Phil., P.Stat.** 

Professor Emeritus of Mathematics and Statistics McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario Canada **Cheryl Anne Murphy , Ph.D.**  Assis tant Professor Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Lym an Briggs College Michigan State University East Lansing, M I
**T homas Potter, Ph.D.**  Research Chemist U

. S

. D epartment of Agriculture Agricultural Research Station (USDA

- ARS) USDA

- ARS, C oastal Plain Experiment Station Southeast Watershed Research Lab Tifton , GA **Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D.** Professor of Aquatic Ecotoxicology and Environmental Toxicology Department of Environmental Sciences University

of California, Riverside Riverside, CA
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
financial statements in the Form 10-K of Brill Media Company, LLC for the year
ended February 28, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                            2,740,000
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5,234,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (212,000)
<INVENTORY>                                         495,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  8,625,000
<PP&E>                                           23,119,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   10,295,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   66,825,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8,715,000
<BONDS>                                         112,206,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (54,097,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     66,825,000
<SALES>                                          40,433,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 40,433,000
<CGS>                                            34,891,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    34,891,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    171,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               11,744,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,373,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        229,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,602,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,602,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0



</TABLE>
[No. 34748.

Department One.

May 5, 1960.]

#### Dolly Thompson, *Respondent,*v. Arthur J. Meuschke *et al., Appellants,*Mike’s Coffee Cup Cafe, Inc., *Defendant.**1*

*Olwell & Boyle*and *Happy, Copeland & King,*for appellants.

*Jordan & Adair,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 351 P. (2d) 939.

Per Curiam.

— Appellant (defendant) accurately presents this case on appeal as “one brought by respondent [plaintiff] to quiet in her the title to an entire tract of real property,” described throughout the record as the “corner” property.

Prior to April 14, 1953, title to the property stood in plaintiff’s name. On that date, the parties entered into a written agreement that stated the property

> “. . . is owned by the First and Second Parties in the following proportion: Sixty (60%) per cent in Dolly Thompson, and forty (40%) per cent in Arthur J. Meuschke.”

The disposition of this case turns on the interpretation given to the transactions surrounding the execution of this agreement. It presents a factual question. As we said in *In re Dand’s Estate,*41 Wn. (2d) 158, 163, 247 P. (2d) 1061 (1952),

> “This case is a striking example of the wisdom of our rule that the trial court, having the witnesses before it, is in a better position to arrive at the truth than is the appellate court. The respondents are entitled to the benefit of all evidence and reasonable inference therefrom in support of the findings of fact entered by the trial court. *Two different theories were presented. The trial court rejected one and accepted the other.*...” (Italics ours.)

On at least three different occasions, the trial court indicated in his oral memorandum opinion that he placed more credence in plaintiff’s testimony than he did in defendant’s.

> As a consequence, the trial court stated in the findings of fact:

> “The court finds that the defendant did not at that time have any pre-existing interest or claim in or to said parcels of real property or any of them. The attempt by the defendant to assert any right, title, *965interest, claim or ownership in said ‘corner’ property prior to April 14, 1953, is so gross as to shock the conscience of the court.”

The trial court concluded:

> “The attempt by the defendant to assert any right, title, interest, claim or ownership in the foregoing described real property prior to April 14, 1953 is so gross as to shock the conscience of the court; it amounts both at law and in equity to proof of fraud, oppression and undue influence.”

There is evidence in the record to support the finding of fact made by the trial court. The finding of fact justifies the court’s conclusion of law, which, in turn, supports the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

l0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

139077 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139077 

 COA: 282548 

Cass CC: 07-010088-FH 

JAMES GREGORY OWENS, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 23, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JA NUARY 31, 2014

NO. 03

- 13

- 00678

- CV

E. H., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JU STICES PURYEAR, ROSE , AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on October 8, 2013 . Having reviewed

t he record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. Because appellant is

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 0 2

- 00 454

- CR

Jerry Lee Berry, Sr. , Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 53,292 , HONORABLE GORDON G. ADAMS , JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Jerry Lee Berry, Sr., pleaded guilty to evading arrest with a motor vehicle. See

Tex. Pen. Code Ann. ' 38.04 (West Supp. 2003). The district cou rt adjudged him guilty and assessed punishment at incarceration in a state jail for two years. See id

. ' 38.04(b)(2).

Appellant = s court

- appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be

advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State , 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State , 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 19 69). A copy of

counsel = s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.2 We have reviewed the record and counsel = s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel = s motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Affirmed
Filed: December 12, 2002

Do Not Publish