alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        of Title 18 Of The United States Code
                        -------------------------------------

I, Ernest J. Mrozek, the President and Chief Financial Officer of The
ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.




                                        /s/ Ernest J. Mrozek
                                        --------------------
                                        Ernest J. Mrozek
                                        President and Chief Financial Officer
                                        March 4, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The ServiceMaster Company and will be retained by The ServiceMaster
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 38474

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

MANUEL AVILA,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2011 Unpublished Opinion No. 716

Filed: November 21, 2011

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Canyon County. Hon. Renae J. Hoff, District Judge. 

Order denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of 

sentence, affirmed.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Jordan E. Taylor, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Manuel Avila pled guilty to murder in the second degree. Idaho Code §§ 18-4001 to 18-

4003. The district court sentenced Avila to unified term of thirty years, with a minimum period 

of confinement of ten years. Avila filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion as to the 

indeterminate portion of his sentence, which the district court denied. Avila appeals.

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency, 

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee, 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In 

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of 

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the 
2

motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the 

record, including the new information submitted with Avila’s Rule 35 motion, we conclude no 

abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Avila’s Rule 

35 motion is affirmed.
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advanta Corp. (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis
Alter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Dennis Alter
-----------------------
Dennis Alter
Chief Executive Officer

May 14, 2003
Exhibit 11


                        Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
                    Computation of Earnings Per Common Share
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)

Three Months Ended March 31,                            1997         1996
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Primary Earnings
    Net Income                                       $    9,617     $   33,689
    Dividends on Preferred Shares                          (481)          (422)
                                                     ----------     ----------
    Net Income Available to Common                   $    9,136     $   33,267
                                                     ==========     ==========
Primary Shares
    Weighted average number of Common and Series A
        Common Shares Outstanding                        61,184         59,035
    Additional shares assuming issuance of:
        Options and Stock Appreciation Rights               141            173
        Convertible Preferred Shares                         --            164
        Common Shares Issuable                               27             21
                                                     ----------     ----------
    Primary Shares                                       61,352         59,393
                                                     ==========     ==========
Primary Earnings per Common Share
    Net Income                                       $      .15     $      .56
                                                     ==========     ==========
Fully Diluted Earnings*
    Net Income                                       $    9,617     $   33,689
    Dividends on Preferred Shares                          (481)          (280)
                                                     ----------     ----------
    Net Income Available to Common                   $    9,136     $   33,409
                                                     ==========     ==========
Fully Diluted Shares
    Weighted average number of Common and Series A
        Common Shares Outstanding                        61,184         59,035
    Additional shares assuming issuance of:
        Options and Stock Appreciation Rights               144            182
        Convertible Preferred Shares                         --            642
        Common Shares Issuable                               27             21
                                                     ----------     ----------
    Fully Diluted Shares                                 61,355         59,880
                                                     ==========     ==========
Fully Diluted Earnings per Common Share
    Net Income                                       $      .15     $      .56
                                                     ==========     ==========


*   This calculation is submitted in accordance with Securities Act of 1934 
    Release No. 9083 although not required by footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of APB 
    Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.


<PAGE>
Turn Rate 

(Degrees/Second) 

l9o Degrees/sec 

Cruise 

Speed 

!\!1m( 115 m/s ~-----------~ 

Gross Takeoff Weight L..l1_42_4~g_ra_m_s ______ ~ 

Approach Speed L..l1_5_m_l_s _____ __, 

!Hoover 

LaunchiRecovery 1._1 O __ m_/_s __________ ___. 

- -== 

Operational lnforrnation 

Location reorgia/Metropolitan Atlanta 

Altitude Koo feet Distance from linside city limits 

u 

Description of 

Operation 

Used to acquire ariel videos and photos of residental and commercial 

properties 

Operations Area (Attach VFR Chart with Coordinates) 

Ciass of .L\lrspace 

0 Under Mode C Veil 

o o 

G 

Flight CondiUons Viii 

VFR 

0 8 (Requires FAA HQ approval) 

o c 

D ,. .. 

t:. 

0 G (With an operational ATC Tovver) 

Air Traffic Communication u 

O VHF 

Transmitter 

0 Yes 

® No 

Receiver Guard (Emergency Frequency) 

0 \'es 

® No ® No
# Contents

Data 1

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/nw2_epg0_sno_r33_bcfw.htm

U.S. Energy Information Administration

infoctr@eia.doe.gov

# Data 1

Back to Contents
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-1451

LT Case No. 2020-CF-001050-A

_____________________________

SHANE ROGERS SIMMS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.850 appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County.

Joel D. Fritton, Judge.

Shane Rogers Simms, East Palatka, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh 

Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

November 28, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

JAY, EISNAUGLE, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-1502NE

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Nebraska.

*

Michael D. Vacanti, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: October 20, 1998

Filed: October 28, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Michael D. Vacanti appeals his convictions for conspiracy to distribute

methamphetamine and money laundering. Vacanti contends the evidence does not

support his convictions because he purchased methamphetamine merely for personal

use. Vacanti’s drug suppliers testified they sold Vacanti several pounds of

methamphetamine over several months, the police found methamphetamine, scales, a

handgun, and other drug paraphernalia in Vacanti’s home, and Vacanti’s cellular phone

records showed numerous calls between Vacanti and his suppliers. This evidence goes

beyond a mere buyer-seller relationship and shows Vacanti knowingly and intentionally

joined an established methamphetamine-distribution conspiracy. See United States v.
-2-

Eastman, 149 F.3d 802, 804 (8th Cir. 1998). Similarly, Vacanti’s financial history and

his wire transfers of large sums of money to his suppliers during the conspiracy support

his money laundering convictions. See id. In sum, sufficient evidence exists from

which a reasonable jury could find Vacanti guilty of all the offenses in the indictment

beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. McCracken, 110 F.3d 535, 540 (8th

Cir. 1997). Vacanti also argues the district court incorrectly calculated his sentence

when the district court attributed more than ten kilograms of methamphetamine to him.

The district court determined this amount based on the trial testimony of Vacanti’s drug

suppliers. The district court determines the credibility of the witnesses and the weight

to be given their testimony, see United States v. Moss, 138 F.3d 742, 744-45 (8th Cir.

1998), and having reviewed the record, we find no error in the district court’s guideline

sentence.

We affirm Vacanti’s convictions.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF VICURON PHARMACEUTICALS INC.



Following is a list of Vicurons subsidiaries, each of which is organized under the laws of the Republic of Italy.
Biosearch Manufacturing S.r.l. was previously a subsidiary of Biosearch. On June 30, 2003, all of the former assets (other than cash) and liabilities of Biosearch, including Biosearch Manufacturing S.r.l., were contributed to Vicuron Pharmaceuticals
Italy S.r.l.



|                                     |  |                          |  |                                                                 |  |                     |  |                    
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | -------------------
|Name                                 |  | Jurisdiction ofFormation |  | Type of Entity                                                  |  | Vicurons Ownership |  | Other BusinessNames
|Biosearch Manufacturing S.r.l.       |  | Republic of Italy        |  | società a responsibilità limitata (a limited liability company) |  | 100%                |  | none               
|                                     |  |                          |  |                                                                
|Vicuron Pharmaceuticals Italy S.r.l. |  | Republic of Italy        |  | società a responsibilità limitata (a limited liability company) |  | 100%                |  | none
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0025

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MARTIN ANDREW REINBOLT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 8, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 4 2020

09/04/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0025
----

----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                      |                       |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|   |                                                                      | /s/      Tammy Lynn McNabb |
|   | Tammy      Lynn McNabb,Chief      Executive OfficerJune      9, 2008 |

----
#### DANIEL C. SETTANI *v.*COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES

*Norman B. Teague,*in support of the petition.

*Robert L. Marconi,*assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided June 25, 1998

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 418 (AC 16911), is denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 164 (Friday, August 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 52601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20653]

[[Page 52601]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8435]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Koloman Moser''

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 2, 2013, notice was published on page 25780 of the 
Federal Register (volume 78, number 85) of determinations made by the 
Department of State pertaining to the exhibition ``Koloman Moser.'' The 
referenced notice is corrected here to include additional objects as 
part of the exhibition. Notice is hereby given of the following 
determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of 
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 
of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 
1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), 
Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of 
Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation 
of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the 
additional objects to be included in the exhibition ``Koloman Moser,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The additional objects are imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the additional exhibit 
objects at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, TX, from on or about 
September 25, 2013, until on or about January 12, 2014, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the additional exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, 
Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 15, 2013.
Lee Satterfield,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-20653 Filed 8-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 8 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk November 8 , 2019

158408 ( 72 )

In re ROBERT E. WHITTON REVOCABLE

TRUST.

_________________________________________

MOLLY MICHALUK,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

SC: 158408

v C OA: 337828

Oakland PC: 2016

- 372116

- TV

EDDIE WHITTON and RICHARD WHITTON,

Successor Trustees of the ROBERT E. WHITTON

REVOCABLE TRUST,

Respondents

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of respondents

- appellees to adjourn the

case from the December 2019 session of the Court is GRANTED. The clerk is directed to

re schedule the case for oral argument at the January 2020 session of the Court

.
I 

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

BRDC, a Joint Venture 

Under Contract No. N69450-1 O-C-1262 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61968 

Michael T. Ambroso, Esq. 

DCK Worldwide, LLC 

Pittsburgh, PA 

Craig D. Jensen, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Matthew D. Bordelon, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: February 4, 2020 

-;--- ~ ~//_/' , _.,r 

TIMOTH ~ M~ii: / 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61968, Appeal ofBRDC, a 

Joint Venture, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
~.---------------------------------------

Lotus cc:Mail for 9-ANM-NPRMCOMMENT

Date: 5/27/20023:57 AM

Sender: "ME\( AVI) DEV ENGG" <devengg_av@piac.com.pk>

To: 9-ANM-NPRMCOMMENT

Priority: Normal

Subject: Modification of Static Inverter - NPRM

Ref /A/ M-7200-02-00767 Dt. 17 May 02

/B/ NPRM 2002-NM-12-AD

RECEIVED

t:,'..' ? 4 2002

f..,.,:v1-114

Ref/A/ informed that Ref/B/ has to be adopted by FAA as an AD. AD would

be applicable on Inverters piNs manufactured by Mis Avionic Instruments

Inc. Detail of P/Ns is mentioned in Ref/A/ TLX.

PIA B737-300 aircraft are equipped with Inverters

Bendix P/N-39B168-1B/-1C (Boeing P/N-60B40023-2),

comments to offer.

Regards,

Javed Sardar Khan

Manager Dev. Engg. (AV)P&P

PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES

manufactured by M/S

hence we have no
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has d etermined that this opinion should not be published and is not

precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50649

(Summary Calendar)

RICHARD CARRILLO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-95-CV-651

April 21, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Richard Carrillo appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment

and affirmation of the Social Security Administration’s denial of his application for disabilit y insurance

benefits and supplemental security income payments, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Carrillo argues that the

Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred in finding that singly, o r in co mbination, his obesity,

diabetes, shortness of breath, hernia and other ailments do not equal the list ing set forth in 20 C.F.R.

§ 404, subpart P, Appendix 1, § 9.09(B). Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties,

we find that the ALJ’s decision was supported by substantial evidence in the record and the proper

legal standards were used in evaluating the evidence. S ee Villa v. Sullivan

, 895 F.2d 1019, 1021 (5th2

Cir. 1990); Ripley v. Chater , 67 F.3d 552, 555 (5th Cir. 1995).

Carrillo also argues that there is no evidence to support the ALJ’s finding that he is able to

perform his past relevant work as a custodian, and that remand is appropriate in order to obtain the

testimony of a medical expert witness as to the physical activities Carrillo can perform. We disagree.

The burden of proof that a claimant is unable to perform previous relevant work is on the claimant

himself; therefore, an ALJ is not required to order additional examinations when the claimant ’s

evidence falls short of proving his assertions. S ee Leggett v. Chater , 67 F.3d 558, 567 (5th Ci r.

1995).

Carrillo further argues that the ALJ failed to evaluate his complaint that pain affected his

capacity to perform past relevant work under the criteria set forth in Social Security Ruling 88-13.

Contrary to Carrillo’s assertions, however, the ALJ considered the factors described in SSR 88-13:

he considered both subjective complaints as well as objective findings, and found that while Carrillo’s

impairments impose limitations on his daily activity, there was no evidence of any nonexertional pain

that would significant ly restrict the range of light work Carrillo could p erform. See Anderson v.

Sullivan

, 887 F.2d 630, 633 (5th Cir. 1989). Upon reviewing the entire record and the parties’ briefs,

we conclude that the ALJ’s finding that Carrillo is able t o perfo rm his past relevant light work is

based on substantial evidence in the record and the proper legal standards. S ee Villa

, 895 F.2d at

1022.

AFFIRMED.
#### JUAREZ v. STATE.

No. 26343.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 1, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.