alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-10137

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER CROCKETT,

also known as Charles Wright,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(CR-195-2)

- - - - - - - - - -

May 10, 1999

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Christopher Crockett’s mother, Patricia

Bonner, seeks to appeal his convictions for robbery and using and

carrying a firearm during a crime of violence. Crockett’s

appointed counsel, Robert R. Smith, seeks to withdraw as Crockett’s

counsel.

We are required to determine, sua sponte, whether we have

appellate jurisdiction. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th

Cir. 1987). The notice of appeal filed and signed by Crockett’s
2

mother is not an effective notice of appeal. The notice of appeal

must be signed by the party or his attorney, and nonlawyers who

have not obtained next friend status are not authorized to

represent others or sign their pleadings. See Gonzales v. Wyatt,

157 F.3d 1016, 1020-22 (5th Cir. 1998); Carter v. Stalder, 60 F.3d

238, 239 (5th Cir. 1995).

Crockett’s appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate

jurisdiction. As such counsel’s responsibilities to Crockett are

over, so counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

DENIED AS MOOT.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3233 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 3, 2013 

Received 

AN ACT 

To extend the period during which Iraqis who were employed 

by the United States Government in Iraq may be granted 

special immigrant status and to temporarily increase the 

fee or surcharge for processing machine-readable nonimmigrant visas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3233 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT-TERM EXTENSION OF SPECIAL IMMI2 GRANT PROGRAM. 

3 Section 1244(c)(3) of the National Defense Author4 ization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (8 U.S.C. 1157 note) 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(C) FISCAL YEAR 2014.— 

7 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Except as pro8 vided in clauses (ii) and (iii), the total 

9 number of principal aliens who may be 

10 provided special immigrant status under 

11 this section during the first 3 months of 

12 fiscal year 2014 shall be the sum of— 

13 ‘‘(I) the number of aliens de14 scribed in subsection (b) whose appli15 cation for special immigrant status 

16 under this section is pending on Sep17 tember 30, 2013; and 

18 ‘‘(II) 2,000. 

19 ‘‘(ii) EMPLOYMENT PERIOD.—The 1- 

20 year period during which the principal 

21 alien is required to have been employed by 

22 or on behalf of the United States Govern23 ment in Iraq under subsection (b)(1)(B) 

24 shall begin on or after March 20, 2003, 

25 and end on or before September 30, 2013. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3233 RDS

1 ‘‘(iii) APPLICATION DEADLINE.—The 

2 principal alien seeking special immigrant 

3 status under this subparagraph shall apply 

4 to the Chief of Mission in accordance with 

5 subsection (b)(4) not later than December 

6 31, 2013.’’. 

7 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY FEE INCREASE FOR CERTAIN CON8 SULAR SERVICES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi10 sion of law, the Secretary of State, not later than January 

11 1, 2014, shall increase the fee or surcharge authorized 

12 under section 140(a) of the Foreign Relations Authoriza13 tion Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103– 

14 236; 8 U.S.C. 1351 note) by $1 for processing machine15 readable nonimmigrant visas and machine-readable com16 bined border crossing identification cards and non17 immigrant visas. 

18 (b) DEPOSIT OF AMOUNTS.—Notwithstanding sec19 tion 140(a)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 

20 Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103–236; 8 

21 U.S.C. 1351 note), the additional amount collected pursu22 ant the fee increase authorized under subsection (a) shall 

23 be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury. 

24 (c) SUNSET PROVISION.—The fee increase authorized 

25 under subsection (a) shall terminate on the date that is 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 3233 RDS

1 2 years after the first date on which such increased fee 

2 is collected. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 2, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.17

                       DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS
                             AS OF DECEMBER 1, 2005

         Effective as of December 1, 2005, the compensation for the directors
who are not our employees was determined to be as follows:


Board Meeting Fees:                      $20,000 per year, payable quarterly

Audit Committee Fees:                    $5,000 per year, payable quarterly

Compensation and Governance/ Nominating
Committee Fees:                          $4,000 per year, payable quarterly

Executive Committee Fees:                $500 per meeting

Chairs of Board and Committees:          $5,000 per year, payable quarterly

Restricted Stock Units*:                 $20,000 in value

Restricted Stock Grant**:                1,000 shares

*Annual grant of restricted stock units to be granted as of the first day of
each fiscal year, with the number of units to be granted determined by dividing
$20,000 by the fiscal year-end stock price. These units vest to the extent of
33-1/3% on the last day of each fiscal year, and the risks of forfeiture lapse
as to such increment, if we achieve 95% of our earnings target established by
our Board of Directors.

**Annual grant of 1,000 shares of Restricted Stock to be granted as of the first
day of each fiscal year and to be fully vested at the time of grant.
EXHIBIT 21



C2, INC.



SUBSIDIARIES



This
exhibit sets forth the Registrants corporate subsidiaries at December 31, 2003 and their states of incorporation. These subsidiaries do business under their own corporate names and are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements.



|                                  |  |                               |  |                   |          |  |     |  
|--------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | ----------------- | -------- |  | --- | -
|Name                              |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |  | C2, Inc.Ownership |         
|                                  |  | Direct                        |  |                   | Indirect | 
|Dedicated Facility Solutions, LLC |  | Delaware                      |  |                   |          |  | 100 | %
|TLC Holdings, Inc.                |  | Wisconsin                     |  | 100               | %        |  |     |  
|Total Logistic Control, LLC       |  | Delaware                      |  | 99                | %        |  | 1   | %
|Zero Zone, Inc.                   |  | Wisconsin                     |  | 100               | %        |  |     |  
|Zero Zone Refrigeration, Inc.     |  | Minnesota                     |  |                   |          |  | 100 | %
|TLC Resources, LLC                |  | Delaware                      |  |                   |          |  | 100 | %
(LOGO)FT MORTGAGE COMPANIES
2974 LBI FREEWAY  ATLANTIC COAST MORTGAGE  MNC MORTGAGE
DALLAS, TX 75234  CARL I. BROWN MORTGAGE   HOMEBANC MORTGAGE
972 484-5600

FIRST TENNESSEE MORTGAGE
SUNBELT NATIONAL MORTGAGE


Arthur Andersen LLP
Suite 1100
100 Peabody Place
Memphis, Tennessee 38103

Dear Sirs:

As of and for the year ended  December 31, 1997, FT Mortgage Companies and its
wholly-owned subsidiary First Tennessee Mortgage Services, Inc. (the "Company")
has  complied in all  material respects, except for the matters disclosed in
Exhibit  I, with the  minimum  servicing  standards  set  forth in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE
BANKERS. As of and for this same period,  the Company had in effect a fidelity
bond policy in the amount of $70,000,000  and an errors and omissions  policy in
the amount of $25,000,000.


                                                       /s/Gary B. Klinger
                                                       Gary B. Klinger
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                                          February 20, 1998



                                                                      EXHIBIT I

MATTER #1:

The Company is required to maintain a loan  servicing file for each of the loans
it services.  During an inventory  of files in prior  years,  the Company  noted
several missing files. The situation reported in the prior year still exists.

MANAGEMENT CORRECTIVE ACTION

The  Company  maintains   collateral   documentation  files  with  the  document
custodians. Internal loan servicing fries will be recreated as necessary.

MATTER #2:

The Company is required to analyze  escrow  balances  for all loans on an annual
basis.  Testing  in prior  years  revealed  a group of loans on which an  escrow
analysis  had not been  performed  in the  preceding  12 months.  The  situation
reported in the prior year still exists.

MANAGEMENT CORRECTIVE ACTION

Management  was made aware of the issue in the prior year and  performed  escrow
analyses on a large  number of the loans  identified  and is  currently  working
through the remainder of the loans
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37196

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

DAVID LEROY LINN

,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2010 Unpublished Opini on No. 656

Filed: October 5, 2010

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, St ate of Idaho,

Bonneville County. Hon. Gregory S. Anderson , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of one year , for felony driving under the influence

, affirmed

.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Sarah E. Tompkins , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawr ence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney
General, Boise, for respondent.

______________________________________________

Before LANSING, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

David Leroy Linn pled guilty to felony driving under the influence . I.C. § § 18

- 8004, 18

-

8005(5), 18

- 8008 . The district court sentenced Linn to a unified term of seven years, with a

minimum period of confinement of one yea r

. Linn appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing2

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its dis cretion.

Therefore, Linn ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3290] 

In accordance with a notice received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, dated September 26, 2000, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning on July 13, 2000 and continuing through September 25, 2000. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.,*                     the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is October 29, 2000 and for economic injury the deadline is May 30, 2001.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) 

Dated: October 6, 2000.

Allan I. Hoberman, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 00-27633 Filed 10-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2660 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2660

  Making supplemental appropriations for the Department of Health and 
   Human Services for awarding grants to States to promote universal 
 access to trauma care services provided by trauma centers and trauma-
                     related physician specialties.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2013

 Mr. Rush (for himself, Mr. Ruppersberger, Mr. Enyart, Mr. Nadler, and 
 Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  Making supplemental appropriations for the Department of Health and 
   Human Services for awarding grants to States to promote universal 
 access to trauma care services provided by trauma centers and trauma-
                     related physician specialties.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Trauma Relief Access for Universal 
Medical Assistance Act''.

SEC. 2. SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR TRAUMA SERVICE AVAILABILITY.

    There is hereby appropriated to the Department of Health and Human 
Services, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, 
for an additional amount for the purpose of carrying out part H of 
title XII of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d-81 et seq.; 
relating to grants to States to promote universal access to trauma care 
services provided by trauma centers and trauma-related physician 
specialties), a total of $100,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 
2014 through 2018.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27559]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33948]


Union Pacific Railroad Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--The 
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

    The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) has 
agreed to grant overhead trackage rights to Union Pacific Railroad 
Company (UP) over BNSF's rail line between BNSF milepost 885.2 near 
Bakersfield, CA, and BNSF milepost 1120.54 near Stockton, CA, a 
distance of 235 miles.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On October 16, 2000, UP filed a petition for exemption in 
STB Finance Docket No. 33948 (Sub-No. 1), Union Pacific Railroad 
Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--The Burlington Northern and 
Santa Fe Railway Company, wherein UP requests that the Board permit 
the proposed overhead trackage rights arrangement described in the 
present proceeding to expire on February 15, 2001. That petition 
will be addressed by the Board in a separate decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on October 20, 2000.
    The purpose of the trackage rights is to permit UP to use the BNSF 
trackage when UP's trackage is out of service for scheduled 
maintenance.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.-Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 653 
(1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If it contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33948 must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of each pleading must 
be served on Robert T. Opal, 1416 Dodge Street, Room 830, Omaha, NE 
68179.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: October 19, 2000.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27559 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
Order entered October 30, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 01343
- CV MATT MALOUF, Appellant

V. STERQUELL PSF SETTLE MENT, L.C., Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 15
- 02371



### O RDER This order is the third in connection with a September 27, 2018 unopposed motion to supplement the reporter’s record with a copy of plaintiff’s exhibit 114. Our f irst order, dated September 28, 2018, granted the motion and directed court reporter V i elica Dobbins to file the supplemental record no later than October 8, 2018. After Ms. Dobbins failed to comply or otherwise communicate with the Court , we issued a sec ond order directing her to file the record no later than October 22, 2018

. Again, Ms. Dobbins failed to comply and, as of this date, she has not otherwise communicate d with the Court. Accordingly, we ORDER Ms. Dobbins to file the supplemental record by 3:00 p.m. on November 2, 2018. Failure to comply could result in an order tha t Ms. Dobbins not sit as a reporter until the record is filed.We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Dale B.

Tillery, Presiding Judge of the 134 th Judicial District Court; Ms. Dobbins; and the parties.
/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed April 16, 2019.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00081

- CR

KENODRICK RICHARDSON , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15

- 10060

- 422F



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Myers, Osborne, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Osborne
Before the Court is appellant’s April 9, 2019 motion to wit hdraw his appeal. The motion

is signed by appellant and his appellate counsel. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). We grant the motion.

We dismiss this appeal.

Do Not Publish
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b)

190081F.U05 /Leslie Osborne/
LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

KENODRICK RICHARDSON, Appellant

No. 05

- 19

- 00081

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court, Kaufman County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 15

- 10060

- 422F. Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne. Justices Myers and Nowell participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.

Judgment entered this 16th day of April, 2019.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RT01-74-000]

Take notice that on October 16, 2000, Carolina Power & Light Company, Duke Energy Corporation, and South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (collectively, the Applicants), pursuant to Sections 203 and 205 of the Federal Power Act, jointly filed their Order No. 2000 compliance filing providing for the creation of a Regional Transmission Organization (RTO). The Applicants seek authorization and approval to establish GridSouth Transco, LLC as an RTO.

                    The Applicants state that they are submitting for approval under FPA Section 205 the terms and conditions of GridSouth's OATT, but are not at this time seeking approval of rates.                          ( print page 64208)    

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene, comments, or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions, comments and protests should be filed on or before November 20, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Beginning November 1, 2000, comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper.                     *See,*18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at ­                    *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm*.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-27554  Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M