alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                     AMENDMENT TO ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
                                 BY AND AMONG
                  FREECALLER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION F/K/A
                     INTELESIS ACQUISITION CORP. AS BUYER
                                      AND
                      THE INTELESIS GROUP, INC. AS SELLER
                                      AND
               FREECALLER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION as ASSIGNOR

     This Amendment is made to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement (the
"Agreement") entered into by and among Freecaller Communications Corporation
f/k/a Intelesis Acquisition Corp. as Buyer, The Intelesis Group, Inc. as Seller,
and FreeCaller Communications Corporation as Assignor (collectively referred to
herein as the "Parties") effective as of the date of the original agreement and
pursuant to the terms of paragraph 12.9 of the Agreement.

     WHEREAS, The Intelesis Group, Inc. had received advances totaling
approximately $627,591.56 from either Buyer or Equalnet Communications Corp.,
the parent corporation of Buyer, and

     WHEREAS, as part of the consideration for the transfer of assets from
Seller, Seller was released from any obligation to repay said advances, as set
forth in paragraph 2.4 (a) (vii) of the Agreement; and

     WHEREAS, the Parties wish to clarify that Seller's release from such
payment obligation was a portion of the consideration that Buyer paid for the
Transferred Assets as defined in the Agreement;

     NOW,THEREFORE, paragraph 2.5 of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the
following sentence to the end of the existing paragraph, supplemental to and not
in replacement of, the currently existing paragraph 2.5:

     "In addition to the other consideration expressly set forth above in this
paragraph, the consideration for the transfer to the Buyer of the Transferred
Assets shall include all other consideration flowing to Seller pursuant to the
terms of this Asset Purchase Agreement, specifically including, but not limited
to, the release of any claims arising out of Buyer's advancement of funds or
other tangible property to Seller as referenced in paragraph 2.4 (a) (viii)
above."

     Signed this 18 day of November, 1999.



SELLER:                                   ASSIGNOR:
THE INTELESIS GROUP, INC.                 FREECALLER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

By: /s/ Ricardo Sablon                    By: /s/ Ricardo Sablon
    -------------------------                 -------------------------
        Ricardo Sablon                            Ricardo Sablon
        President                                 President


BUYER:
FREECALLER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION f/k/a
INTELESIS ACQUISITION CORP.



By: /s/ Mitchell H. Bodian
    ---------------------------------
        Mitchell H. Bodian
        President
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-10282

Summary Calendar

TERRY JAMES,

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

RICHARD LEMAY; WANDA PARISH; THERESA TRISTEIN,

Defendants - Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:10-CV-76

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by the

magistrate judge and district judge.

Federal courts are limited in their jurisdiction. Defamation or injury to

reputation is not a protected liberty interest to justify federal jurisdiction. Paul

v. Davis, 96 S.Ct. 1155 (1976). And Mr. James has not complained of a

conspiracy to harm him because of his race.

AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 18, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 10-10282 Document: 00511114301 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/18/2010
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Annual Report of Nevada Geothermal Power Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F
for the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and                                    
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                               
|2. | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      andresults of operation of the Company.
|  

Date: January 15,
2008

By: /s/ Andrew T. Studley   Name: Andrew T. Studley    Title: Chief
Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Nevada
Geothermal Power Inc. and will be retained by Nevada Geothermal Power Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
ECONOMIC AND REGULATORY EVALUATION

Regulatory Evaluation Form, Revision 2.4 Page 1 of 1

8/22/08

AD Title: RB211-535 LPT Stage 1-3 Disk inspection –supersedure to change shop visit 

definition

Docket No. FAA-2010-0994 Directorate Identifier: 2009-NE-39-AD

Costs:

Costs per Product (e.g., engine, propeller)

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

WorkhoursLabor cost 

(@$80/hour)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 30.0 $2,550.00 $0 $2,550.00 588 $1,499,400

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1,499,400

Costs covered under warranty 0

Special considerations for Economic Analysis: Corrected number of US-registered Engines. FOR REVISION: 

No change to the expected costs.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES explain below NO 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES explain below NO 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES explain below NO 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES explain below NO 

Explanation:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3167 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3167

 To amend the bases for ineligibility for designation of countries as 
  beneficiary developing countries under title V of the Trade Act of 
                     1974, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 20, 2013

  Mr. Terry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the bases for ineligibility for designation of countries as 
  beneficiary developing countries under title V of the Trade Act of 
                     1974, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Playing Fair on Trade and Innovation 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF BENEFICIARY DEVELOPING COUNTRIES UNDER THE 
              GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF PREFERENCES PROGRAM.

    (a) Countries Ineligible for Designation.--Section 502(b)(2) of the 
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2462(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting after subparagraph (H) the following new 
        subparagraphs:
                    ``(I) Such country fails to provide adequate and 
                effective protection for intellectual property rights.
                    ``(J) Such country maintains local content 
                requirements, other than requirements that apply only 
                to the procurement by governmental agencies of products 
                purchased for governmental purposes and not with a view 
                to commercial resale or with a view to use in the 
                production of goods for commercial sale.''; and
            (2) in the matter following subparagraph (J) (as added by 
        paragraph (1) of this subsection)--
                    (A) by striking ``and (H)'' and inserting ``(H)''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``shall not'' and inserting ``, 
                (I), and (J) shall not''.
    (b) Factors Affecting Country Designation.--Section 502(c) of the 
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2462(c)) is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (5); and
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (6) and (7) as paragraphs 
        (5) and (6), respectively.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section takes effect on the date of the 
enactment of this Act and applies with respect to the designation of 
any country as a beneficiary developing country under title V of the 
Trade Act of 1974 on or after such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.19


 


 


AMENDMENT TO THE


LKQ CORPORATION 401(K) PLUS PLAN II


 


WHEREAS, LKQ Corporation (“Company”) previously adopted the LKQ
Corporation 401(k) Plus Plan II (“Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan in Section
10.3 thereof; and


 


WHEREAS, effective December 15, 2005, the Company desires to amend the
Plan as set forth below;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, effective December 15, 2005, the Plan is amended as
follows:


 


1. The first sentence of Section 4.1 is
deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:


 


Before the first day of each Plan Year (or otherwise as
permitted by applicable law), a Participant may file with the Committee a
Participation Agreement pursuant to which such Participant elects to make
Deferrals.


 


2. Section 4.3 is deleted in its entirety and
replaced by the following:


 


4.3. MODIFICATION
OR REVOCATION OF ELECTION BY PARTICIPANT.


 


A Participant may change his Deferrals during the
annual election period which begins on December 1 and ends on December 31 of
the calendar year preceding the Plan Year for which the change is to take
effect. Under no circumstances may a Participant’s Participation Agreement be
made, modified or revoked retroactively, nor may a Participant modify his
Deferrals other than as set forth in this Section 4.3. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, a Participant’s election shall be terminated in the event the
Participant receives a distribution from the 401(k) Plan on account of hardship
as provided in Section 4.7 hereof.


 


3. The following is added to the end of
Section 7.1(b):


 


Such change shall not take effect until at least
twelve (12) months after the date on which the change is made, and the first
payment with respect to such election change shall not commence for a period of
less than five (5) years from the date such payment would have otherwise been
made had the change not occurred.


 

















 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by a duly
authorized officer this 15th day of December, 2005


 


	
   

  	
  LKQ
  CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Victor M. Casini

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title: Vice President and General Counsel
#### Petersime Incubator Company *v.*Guthrie, Appellant.

Argued November 20,1939.

*533December 13, 1939:

Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Parker, Rhodes and Hirt, JJ.

jET. *Leon Bennett,*for appellant.

*W. E. Bushong,*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

This appeal was taken by defendant from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff by the Prothonotary of Chester County, for want of an affidavit of defense, five days after defendant’s second supplemental affidavit of defense and counter claim had been stricken off by the court.

The appeal must be quashed .on the authority of *Pettit v. Clever,*219 Pa. 428, 67 A. 960. It was there held that no appeal lies from a judgment entered by the prothonotary, as of course, with no order of intervention by the court. If the judgment was improperly entered, relief from it must be asked from the court in which it was entered, and if the court denies such relief, an appeal may then be taken.

*534Appeal quashed, without prejudice to the right of defendant to move the court below to strike off the judgment, within thirty days after the return of the record.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1273
JEFFREY THOMAS FARMER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, at Chapel Hill, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-03-103-H) Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 22, 2003 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey Thomas Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Thomas Farmer appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act for failing to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Farmer v. University of North Carolina , No. CA-03-103-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 20, 2003). We deny Farmer’s motions to expedite the appeal and to seal forwarded documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Ex parte Conway C. CRAIG. Ex parte Bob McCRACKEN. Ex parte Tom MULVANEY.

Nos. 23232-23234.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 15, 1947.

PER CURIAM.

In obedience to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, Craig v. Harney, 331 U.S. 367, 67 S.Ct. 1249, which reversed 193 S.W.2d 178, entered on May 19, 1947, reversing the decision of this court in this cause, it is ordered that re-lators be and are hereby discharged.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

K.M., the mother

, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM Appellee s

.

No. 4D 18

- 791

[ July 2 6 , 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Stacey Schulman , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2017

- 4770 DP

.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellan t.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carolyn Schwarz, Assistant Attorney General, Children’s Legal Services, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Rocco J. Carbone, III, Law Office of Rocco J. Carbone, III, PLLC, St. Augustine, and Thomasina Moore, Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY
, C IKLIN
, JJ., and H ARPER
, B RADLEY
, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
MARK A. EDWARDS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHE ARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IS FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 4623

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 17, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. James B. Fensom , Judge.

Mark A. Edwards , pro se, Appellant

.

Pam ela Jo Bondi, Attorney General , Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, RAY, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 211 (Tuesday, October 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64983-64984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27843]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-500 0777-XQ-2527]

Front Range Resource Advisory Council (Colorado) Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 
(FACA), 5 U.S.C. Appendix, notice is hereby given that the next meeting 
of the Front Range Resource Advisory Council (Colorado) will be held on 
November 9 in Canon City, Colorado.
    The meeting is scheduled to begin at 9:15 a.m. at the Holy Cross 
Abbey Community Center, 2951 E. Highway 50, Canon City, Colorado. 
Topics will include an update on the Revision of the Arkansas 
Headwaters Recreation Area Plan and election of officers. All Resource 
Advisory Council meetings are open to the public. Interested persons 
may make oral statements to the Council at 9:30 a.m. or written 
statements may be submitted for the Council's consideration. The Center 
Manager may limit the length of oral presentations depending on the 
number of people wishing to speak.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, November 9, 2000 from 
9:15 a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Front Range

[[Page 64984]]

Center, 3170 East Main Street, Canon City, Colorado 81212.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken Smith at (719) 269-8500.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Summary minutes for the Council meeting will 
be maintained in the Canon City Center and will be available for public 
inspection and reproduction during regular business hours within thirty 
(30) days following the meeting.

    Dated: October 19, 2000.
John Carochi,
Acting Front Range Center Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-27843 Filed 10-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3373 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3373

     To prohibit incurring further obligations with respect to the 
           healthcare.gov website without offsetting savings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 29, 2013

 Mr. Johnson of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To prohibit incurring further obligations with respect to the 
           healthcare.gov website without offsetting savings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Healthcare.gov Spending 
Accountability Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRING OFFSETTING SAVINGS BEFORE INCURRING ANY ADDITIONAL 
              OBLIGATIONS FOR THE HEALTHCARE.GOV WEBSITE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
Federal official, including the Secretary of Health and Human Services, 
may incur any obligations on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act with respect to the repair or maintenance of the healthcare.gov 
website, unless and until--
            (1) the President submits to Congress proposed reductions 
        in Affordable Care Act Federal spending described in subsection 
        (b) that are commensurate with the amount of obligations to be 
        so incurred; and
            (2) the Congress enacts a law effecting spending reductions 
        commensurate with the amount of obligations to be so incurred.
    (b) Affordable Care Act Federal Spending.--For purposes of 
subsection (a), Affordable Care Act Federal spending is Federal 
spending to carry out the provisions of, including amendments made by, 
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148) or 
title I or subtitle B of title II of the Health Care and Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-152).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanta Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Philip
M. Browne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Philip M. Browne
--------------------
Philip M. Browne
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2002