alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.02**
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Robert A. Wolf, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Viseon, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.    Date: May 16, 2005    /s/ Robert A. Wolf   Robert A. Wolf
#### BOETTCHER et ux. v. A. R. & FELIX FEHRENKEMP.

No. 3861.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

July 18, 1941.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 17, 1941.

Jos. V. Frnka, of Columbus, for appellant.

Miller & Rutta, of Columbus, for appel-lee.

COMBS, Justice.

The action was by appellees against appellants in trespass to try title. Appellants answered by plea of not guilty as to an undivided one-sixth interest in the land, and by disclaimer as to an undivided five-sixth interest. On trial to the court without a jury judgment was for appellees. No conclusions of fact and law were filed. The appeal was to the Galveston Court of Civil Appeals, and is on our docket by order of transfer by the Supreme Court.

Appellants’ briefs contain neither assignments of error nor propositions, for which reason we sustain appellees’ motion to strike.

Since appellees have briefed the case, we have examined the record for fundamental error, and find none. The evidence raised the issue, resolved in appel-lees’ favor by the court in entering the judgment, that the deed, which appellants claim was a mortgage, was in fact an absolute conveyance.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 311 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

Agency to change the Spill Prevention, Control, and 

Countermeasure rule with respect to certain farms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 311 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farmers Undertake 

3 Environmental Land Stewardship Act’’ or the ‘‘FUELS 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, 

6 AND COUNTERMEASURE RULE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator, in imple8 menting the Spill Prevention, Control, and Counter9 measure rule with respect to any farm, shall— 

10 (1) require certification of compliance with such 

11 rule by— 

12 (A) a professional engineer for a farm 

13 with— 

14 (i) an individual tank with an above15 ground storage capacity greater than 

16 10,000 gallons; 

17 (ii) an aggregate aboveground storage 

18 capacity greater than or equal to 42,000 

19 gallons; or 

20 (iii) a history that includes a spill, as 

21 determined by the Administrator; or 

22 (B) the owner or operator of the farm (via 

23 self-certification) for a farm with— 

24 (i) an aggregate aboveground storage 

25 capacity greater than 10,000 gallons but 

26 less than 42,000 gallons; and 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 311 RFS 

1 (ii) no history of spills, as determined 

2 by the Administrator; and 

3 (2) exempt from all requirements of such rule 

4 any farm— 

5 (A) with an aggregate aboveground storage 

6 capacity of less than or equal to 10,000 gallons; 

7 and 

8 (B) no history of spills, as determined by 

9 the Administrator. 

10 (b) CALCULATION OF AGGREGATE ABOVEGROUND

11 STORAGE CAPACITY.—For the purposes of subsection (a), 

12 the aggregate aboveground storage capacity of a farm ex13 cludes all containers on separate parcels that have a ca14 pacity that is less than 1,320 gallons. 

15 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

16 In this Act, the following terms apply: 

17 (1) ADMINISTRATOR.—The term ‘‘Adminis18 trator’’ means the Administrator of the Environ19 mental Protection Agency. 

20 (2) FARM.—The term ‘‘farm’’ has the meaning 

21 given such term in section 112.2 of title 40, Code 

22 of Federal Regulations. 

23 (3) GALLON.—The term ‘‘gallon’’ refers to a 

24 United States liquid gallon. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 311 RFS 

1 (4) SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND COUN2 TERMEASURE RULE.—The term ‘‘Spill Prevention, 

3 Control, and Countermeasure rule’’ means the regu4 lation promulgated by the Environmental Protection 

5 Agency under part 112 of title 40, Code of Federal 

6 Regulations. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 11, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3385 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to require the Secretary of the 

Treasury to provide for the purchase of paper United States savings 

bonds with tax refunds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2013 

Mr. CARTWRIGHT (for himself, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. JONES, Mr. OLSON, Ms. 

TSONGAS, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. NOLAN, Mr. CUMMINGS, 

Ms. LEE of California, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. ESTY, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. 

ENYART, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. HOLT, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. 

LIPINSKI, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. OWENS, Ms. JACKSON

LEE, Mr. O’ROURKE, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. TONKO, and Ms. KAPTUR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to require the Secretary of the Treasury to provide for the purchase of 

paper United States savings bonds with tax refunds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save Access to a Valu5 able Investment Needed to Generate Savings Act of 2013’’ 

6 or the ‘‘SAVINGS Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3385 IH

1 SEC. 2. PURCHASE PAPER UNITED STATES SAVINGS BONDS 

2 WITH TAX REFUND. 

3 Section 3106 of title 31, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(d)(1) During the period ending on December 31, 

6 2018, the Secretary shall provide an option on individual 

7 returns of tax under subtitle A of the Internal Revenue 

8 Code of 1986 to purchase United States savings bonds 

9 in paper form with a portion or all of a refund of overpay10 ment of such tax for the purchaser or anyone. 

11 ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply if the Secretary 

12 implements an alternative option which— 

13 ‘‘(A) allows for the gifting of United States sav14 ings bonds, 

15 ‘‘(B) serves the unbanked, and 

16 ‘‘(C) retains the ability to sign-up on the return 

17 of tax.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4556

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTJUANE GLENTO DILWORTH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-04-412)

Submitted: November 30, 2005 Decided: December 19, 2005

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, William C. Ingram,

First Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North

Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States

Attorney, Robert A. J. Lang, Assistant United States Attorney,

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Antjuane Glento Dilworth pled guilty to possession of a

firearm after having been convicted of a felony offense, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000); and possession of a

firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of

18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(2000). The district court sentenced him to a

total of 262 months’ imprisonment.

Dilworth maintains that he was erroneously sentenced as

a career offender because one of his predicate offenses was not

punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year. See U.S.

Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“USSG”) § 4B1.2(a) (2004) (defining

“crime of violence”). Specifically, Dilworth asserts that the

district court erred in finding a 1996 breaking and entering

conviction applied as a predicate “crime of violence” conviction.

While the maximum aggravated punishment for this Class H conviction

was thirty months’ imprisonment, Dilworth notes that, based on his

criminal history, and in the absence of aggravating factors, the

maximum sentence he could have received was twelve months.

Dilworth thus maintains that his sentence could not have exceeded

a year, and that this conviction does not qualify as a “crime of

violence” for career offender purposes.

We conclude that the district court did not err. See

United States v. Harp, 406 F.3d 242, 246-47 (4th Cir. 2005)

(holding that United States v. Jones, 195 F.3d 205 (4th Cir. 1999),
- 3 -

is still viable after Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531

(2004), and United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), and

reaffirming that “a prior North Carolina conviction was for ‘a

crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year’ if

any defendant charged with that crime could receive a sentence of

more than one year.” (internal citation omitted)).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district

court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Axeda Systems Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-94417 and 333-82510) on Form S-8 and (Nos. 333-70234 and 333-60538) on Form
S-3 of Axeda Systems Inc. of our reports dated February 3, 2003, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Axeda Systems Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows and the related
consolidated financial statement schedule for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which reports appear in the December
31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Axeda Systems Inc.

Our reports refer to a change in the method of accounting for goodwill and other
intangible assets.


KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 3, 2003
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.2

                         CITIZENS & NORTHERN CORPORATION

                          EMPLOYEE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

                             STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

     A qualified STOCK OPTION for a total of _______ SHARES of common stock, par
value $1.00, of Citizens & Northern Corporation, a Pennsylvania business
corporation (herein the "Corporation") is hereby granted as of January 3, 2005
to _____________ (herein the "Employee"), subject in all respects to the terms
and provisions of Citizens & Northern Corporation 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended April 15, 2003 (herein the "Plan"), which has been adopted by the
Corporation's shareholders and which is incorporated herein by reference. The
option price as determined under paragraph 7 of the Plan is _____________
($______) Dollars per share.

     This Option may not be exercised more than ten (10) years from the date of
its grant, and may be exercised during such term only in accordance with the
terms of the Plan.

                           RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT

     A total of ________ SHARES of RESTRICTED common STOCK, par value $1.00, of
Citizens & Northern Corporation, a Pennsylvania business corporation (herein the
"Corporation") is hereby awarded as of January 3, 2005 to ______________ (herein
the "Employee"), subject in all respects to the terms and provisions of Citizens
& Northern Corporation 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (herein the "Plan"), amended
April 15, 2003, which has been adopted by the Corporation's shareholders and
which is incorporated herein by reference.

     These shares cannot be sold, exchanged, transferred, pledged or otherwise
disposed of, except in accordance with the Plan. These transferability
restrictions will lapse as follows: ___ shares on ______ __, 2____; ___ shares
on ______ __, 2___; and ___ shares on ______ __, 2___.

Dated: January 3, 2005

                                        CITIZENS & NORTHERN CORPORATION


                                        BY
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Craig G. Litchfield
                                           Chairman, President &
                                           Chief Executive Officer

ATTEST:


-------------------------------------
Kathleen M. Osgood
Corporate Secretary

     The Employee acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan, and represents
that he or she is familiar with the terms and provisions thereof. The Employee
hereby accepts this Option and Award subject to all the terms and provisions of
the Plan.


Dated:                                  BY
       ------------------------------      -------------------------------------
                                           Employee


                                       76
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Northeast Dairy Compact Commission

# AGENCY:

Northeast Dairy Compact Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Compact Commission will hold its regular monthly meeting to consider matters relating to administration and enforcement of the price regulation, including the reports and recommendations of the Commission's standing Committees.

# DATES:

The meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, November 1, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Centennial Inn, Armenia White Room, 96 Pleasant Street, Concord, New Hampshire. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Daniel Smith, Executive Director, Northeast Dairy Compact Commission, 34 Barre Street, Suite 2, Montpelier, VT 05602. Telephone (802) 229-1941. 

Authority:7 U.S.C. 7256. 

Dated: October 16, 2000.

Daniel Smith,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 00-26973  Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1650-01-M
<PAGE> 1
                         EXHIBIT 10.10


                      FRONTIER CORPORATION
                                
                 MANAGEMENT STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
                                
                         Amendment No. 1
                                
                                
     Pursuant to Section 14, the Plan is hereby amended as
follows:

     1.   Effective April 19, 1996, Section 5(d) is amended by
deleting the last paragraph thereof and by adding to the end of
the first paragraph the following sentence:

     The Committee may impose such other terms and conditions
     on the exercise of options as it deems appropriate to
     serve the purposes for which this Plan has been established.

     2.   Effective November 20, 1995, Section 7(e) is amended by
adding to the end thereof the following:

     Until such time as the restricted shares vest, all dividends
     payable on such shares shall be reinvested in the Company's
     Common Stock, treated as restricted stock until the
     underlying restricted shares vest, and, upon such vesting,
     released to the participant.  If the underlying shares do
     not vest, all shares purchased with the reinvested dividends
     shall be forfeited.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly
authorized officer to execute this amendment on its behalf this
16th day of October, 1997.

Dated  10/16/97                    FRONTIER CORPORATION
     -----------------

                                   By /s/ Josephine S. Trubek
                                      ----------------------
                                       Josephine S. Trubek
                                       Corporate Secretary
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3235 

To provide for the compensation of any Federal, State, or local employee 

furloughed due to a lapse in appropriations which began on or about 

October 1, 2013. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 2, 2013 

Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for the compensation of any Federal, State, or 

local employee furloughed due to a lapse in appropriations which began on or about October 1, 2013. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMPENSATION FOR FURLOUGHED EMPLOY4 EES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any Federal employee or State or 

6 local employee furloughed due to a lapse in appropriations 

7 (from the Treasury of the United States) which began on 

8 or about October 1, 2013, shall be compensated at such 

9 employee’s standard rate of compensation, for the period 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3235 IH

1 of such lapse in appropriations, as soon as practicable 

2 after such lapse in appropriations ends. 

3 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this Act— 

4 (1) the term ‘‘Federal employee’’ means an em5 ployee as defined by section 2105 of title 5, United 

6 States Code; 

7 (2) the term ‘‘State or local employee’’ means 

8 an individual employed by the government of a 

9 State, municipality, or other political subdivision of 

10 a State, or by the government of the District of Co11 lumbia, whose principal employment is in connection 

12 with an activity which is financed in whole or in part 

13 by loans or grants made by the United States; and 

14 (3) the term ‘‘State’’ means a State or territory 

15 or possession of the United States. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Eleventh Court of Appeals Mandate

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 104TH DISTRICT COURT OF TAYLOR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas, on November 9, 2017, the

cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Martel Sephion Beaver

11th Court of Appeals No. 11-15-00290-CR and

104th District Court Case No. 19548B

The State of Texas

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

 “This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed."

WHEREFORE WE COMMAND YOU To observe the order of our said Court of

Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the HON. JIM R. WRIGHT, Chief

Justice of our said Court, with the seal

thereof annexed at the City of Eastland, on

January 8, 2018.

SHERRY WILLIAMSON, CLERK

FILE COPY
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tongli
Pharmaceuticals (USA), Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2010, I, Li Li, Chief
Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1. Such
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Tongli Pharmaceuticals (USA),
Inc.




Dated:
June 29, 2010




/s/
      Li LiLi
      LiChief
      Financial Officer