alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
541 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

aROVcR SKLLRS 

AhORNFT Gcnm”rL 

Roaorable t. J. Tuoker 

County Attommy 

sulphur apringo, To%40 

Opinion No. C-78)9 

ilor The 

the g 

ouu 8nd 4utborlt7 of 

it7 c8niorioa or 

You hate Nqumted th 

48 tollw8l 

“The city CmEdrrl 

no protort or petition 

thr 8ppliaation for 8 fr8.b 

Attachad herato la 

of tho above referred 

a copy 

satlon.n 

to or&ance, for your inforThe City of Stalphur Spring* 18 operating under a 

ahartrr granted in 1911 by the Legislrturo of Texas (Chapter 

k?, page 375, Acts of the 32nd Luglslature). *me are informed 

t!lzt In 1937 the qualified voter0 of SUphur Springs, 8t a 
NOB. T, J. tioker - Pye 2 

r8ylvl7 r a ill ed lrotion, dlupproved the adoption of the 

R-e 2ulo Aundmut. 

Cenua la w8 ( ;o vuni088 y l h le8bionr l8 8au 

l lt7.m 

?h@ above quo%ed 8h4rtU pmri8i048 ue 8pOO1fi8 

upon the proaedure to k followed in th8 granting of l franChi80 by the City Of E+ulphur bprlagr for the purpo8a of 

operating l l y8teof & burr8 within the eitye Ar l uoh, the ' 

;vovirionr of Subsrotlon (qq) naoes441%y pnrdl over other 

ccnerd provision8 ln tho charter, PartiCUlPrly Sootton 3 

of Article X1X upon tha gen+:ral cubjeot of franrhire granting 

ordinunc6r. 

You we advim? that it 1s the opinion of thin 

LkpsrCi:.ent t&t the aaycr &?d iitp Conaisslm of -ulphur 

.+rin;:s, Terns, has the pouer and authority to arpkc a &rant 

/of a I‘ranahise for the purpoer of opcreting a o ~~tsai of 

bums in the City of Sulphur Spriwa without 80 L ireion af 

the quc&l.on to a vote of tbt qualified rotera of the Clt 

unless within thirty days after the pe8tux.q Of tbc branch I’ M 
543 

Non. T. J. Tuokor - Pap f 

gmntl ordiauwo, l petitlon ri&md by the lr uirite oumbu 

of q-1 “I ffrd tofua aa rpeoiflwd ln Subrrrtlon 9 qq) rhrll 

be ptraonted to the coadraloaur nqurrtlns that uid ordinmae b8 euba4tted to vote of the people. 

Your, ruy wuly 

ATTORXXY OAkXRAt O? TEXAS
<TABLE>



                        LIBERTY FINANCIAL COMPANIES, INC.

                 EXHIBIT 12 - Statement re Computation of Ratios
                                ($ in thousands)

<CAPTION>



                                 Three Months Ended        Nine Months Ended
                                    September 30             September 30
                                ----------------------   ----------------------
                                   1996       1995         1996        1995
                                ----------- ----------   ----------  ----------
<S>                                <C>        <C>         <C>          <C>  
Earnings:
   Pretax income                   $36,402    $32,689     $106,730     $83,244
   Add fixed charges:
     Interest on indebtedness        4,930      4,682       14,986      11,451
     Portion of rent  representing
      the interest factor            1,074      1,168        3,220       3,007
     Preferred stock dividends         236        236          707         490
     Accretion to face value
     of redeemable convertible 
      preferred stock                  197        197          590         395  
                                  --------   --------     --------     -------
     Income as adjusted            $42,839    $38,972     $126,233     $98,587
                                  ========   ========     ========     =======
Fixed charges:

   Interest on indebtedness         $4,930     $4,682      $14,986     $11,451
   Portion of rent representing
    the interest factor              1,074      1,168        3,220       3,007
   Preferred stock dividends           236        236          707         490
   Accretion to face value of
   redeemable convertible preferred
    stock                              197        197          590         395
                                  --------   --------     --------    -------- 
   Total fixed charges              $6,437     $6,283      $19,503     $15,343
                                  ========   ========     ========    ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed        
 charges                              6.66 x     6.20 x       6.47 x      6.43 x
                                  ========   ========     ========    ========

</TABLE>
Take notice that on January 24, 2000, TransAlta Centralia Generation LLC (TACG) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), an amendment to its application for determination of exempt wholesale generator status pursuant to Part 365 of the Commission's regulations.

Any person desiring to be heard concerning the amended application for exempt wholesale generator status should file a motion to intervene or comments with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). The Commission will limit its consideration of comments to those that concern the adequacy or accuracy of the amended application. All such motions and comments should be filed on or before February 22, 2000, and must be served on the applicant. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection or on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (please call (202) 208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-2780  Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT CABINET Steven L. Beshear Governor Capital Plaza Tower 500 Mero Street, 12'~ Floor Frankfort, Kentucky40601 Phone: (502) 564-71 92 Fax: (502) 564-7484 Leonard K. Peters Secretary

July 27,2010 Dr. A. Stanley Meiburg Acting Regional Administrator U.S. EPA, Region 4 SamNunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dr. Meiburg,
As requested in the preamble to the "Tailoring Rule" (75 FR 31582), the Energy and Environment Cabinet, on behalf ofthe Commonwealthof Kentucky, respectfully submits this letter to the EPA Administrator detailing the regulatory process of adopting the "Tailoring Rule". To retain state primacy of the New Source Review (NSR) Program, the Commonwealth is obligatedto adopt the recent revisions to the NSR and Title V definitions. Therefore, as a SIP-approved state for the NSR program, the Energy and Environment Cabinet intendsto amend the current regulationsto definethe term "subject to regulation" for the NSR program and the Title V permitting program and maintain a fully SIP-approved NSR program in Kentucky. Considering the statutory and regulatory requirements in appropriately promulgating regulations, the Energy and Environment Cabinet submits the following schedule for amending the regulations to allow for the incorporation of the "Tailoring Rule."

File regulations with the Kentucky Legislative Research Commission (LRC) Publish regulation in the Administrative Register of Kentuckv July 14,2010 " (ARK) (~e2ns 30 day public comment period) Conduct Public Hearing in accordancewith KRS 13A.270 End Public Comment Period Submit Statement of Consideration (SOC) of comments received August 1,2010 August 24,2010 August 3 1,2010 during public comment period First Legislative Subcommittee (Administrative Regulation Review September 15,2010


## - Subcommittee

# - ARRS) reviews regulation Second Legislative Subcommittee (Agriculture and Natural Resources Subcommittee) reviews regulation Announce effective date of regulation

Please note that 40 CFR 51.104(b) allows for 60 days after the effective date to submit revisions to EPA as a SIP amendment. October 12,2010 November 4,2010 Ifreviewed by 2nd Subcommittee, the effective date is at adjournment of meeting, else 30 days after the
Submit amendments to EPA as an amendmentto Kentucky's SIP

An Equal Opportunity Employer MlFlD regulation referral by 1 st subcommittee December 1,2010Dr. A. Stanley Meiburg July 27,2010 Page 2

If you have questions or need clarification regarding this information, please contact Mr. John S. Lyons, Director ofthe Division for Air Quality, at (502) 564-3999 or John.Lyons@ky.gov.

Sincerely Yours,

Leonard K. Peters Secretary

An Equal Opportunity Employer MIFID
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*KENNETH CURTIS

*Salvatore C. DePiano,*in support of the petition.

*John C. Smirga,*supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided June 10, 1998

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 18118) is denied.

BERDON, J.,

dissenting. I would grant the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal.
Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.23 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This is the First Amendment to the Employment Agreement
(the “Agreement”) between James Krause (“Employee”) and Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“Employer”), which became effective on November 21, 2003. 
 This First Amendment is effective June 1, 2004. Except as set forth herein, all other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full
force and effect. 
 Paragraph 1: 
 Paragraph 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended as follows to reflect Employee’s new position as Chief Information Officer: 
 Employment. Subject to the terms of the Agreement, Employer hereby agrees to employ Employee during the Agreement Term as Managing Director, Chief Information Officer, and Employee hereby accepts such employment. Employee
shall report to the Employer’s President and Chief Operating Officer. Employee shall perform those duties as determined by CME’s President and Chief Operating Officer, including, but not be limited to, the performance of all duties
associated with executive oversight and management of the Employer’s Information Technology Division. Employee shall devote his full time, ability and attention to the business of Employer during the Agreement Term, subject to the direction of
the President and Chief Operating Officer. 
 Paragraph 2: 
 The Agreement Term defined in Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is hereby extended through December 31, 2007. 
 Paragraph 3(a): 
 The annual Base Salary defined in Paragraph 3(a) of
the Agreement is hereby increased to not less than $300,000.00 per year. 
  

									
	CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC.	 		 	JAMES KRAUSE
					
	By:	 	

	 		 	 By:
	 	


	 Title:
	 	CEO	 		 	 Title:
	 	Managing Director
		 		 		 		 	Chief Information Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of MDSI Mobile Data Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Erik Dysthe, the President,  Chief Executive Officer,  Chairman of the Board and
Director of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                           /s/ Erik Dysthe
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                           Chairman of the Board and Director
                                           November 19, 2003




================================================================================
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

of

Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Thomas W. Hofmann, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sunoco, Inc., hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Sunoco, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 1, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas W. Hofmann                            
|                       |  |  |  | Thomas W. Hofmann                                
|                       |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES *v.*FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION ET AL.

The petition by the defendant Local 2663, Council 4, AFSCME, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 467 (AC 16997), is denied.

*912
      *Jason W.*Cohen, in support of the petition.

*Ralph G. Elliot,*in opposition.

Decided June 17, 1998

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 32(a)

              SECTION 1350 Certification (Chief Executive Officer)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Financial  Corporation,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I Michael C. Gerald,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the
best of my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the Report.

This Certification is provided as of May 10, 2005.

                                               /s/ Michael C. Gerald
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Michael C. Gerald
                                               President/Chief Executive Officer


                                       35
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 210 (Monday, October 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27804]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3458]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Art and the Camera: The Photographs of F. Holland 
Day''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations.
    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 
1965 [79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459], the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 [112 Stat. 2681 et seq.], Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999 [64 FR 56014], and Delegation of 
Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999 [64 FR 57920], as amended by 
Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 [65 FR 53795], I 
hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibit, ``Art 
and the Camera: The photographs of F. Holland Day,'' imported from 
abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United 
States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with a foreign lender. I also determine 
that the temporary exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the 
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Massachusetts from on or about December 6, 
2000, to on or about March 25, 2002, is in the national interest. 
Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, 202/619-5997, and the address is SA-44, 
Room 700, United States Department of State, 301 4th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: October 23, 2000.
William B. Bader,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 00-27804 Filed 10-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            6
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                          18,044,121
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                         25,169,641
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                 468,998
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 25,638,639
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                       0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                        9,303,921
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                      322,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                            9,626,158
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                       9,492,599
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                          5,023,361
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                          5,023,361
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                      6,519,882
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                         0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                        0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                       0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                       7,125,520
<NET-ASSETS>                                   16,012,481
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                              0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                              350,461
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 75,989
<EXPENSES-NET>                                 961,351
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                        (534,901)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                       (12,689)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                      7,934,523
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                          7,386,933
<EQUALIZATION>                                 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                      0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                          0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                        0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                    0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                            0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                         7,386,933
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                        0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                      0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                        0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                     0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             394,340
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                961,351
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                           14,434,688
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                          1.72
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                (0.11)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                        1.58
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                           0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                      0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                           0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                            3.19
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                6.66
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                         9,293,712
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                           1.85
        


</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5 TH CIR . R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 19, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60270 Summary Calendar

NAFISA ALI, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Before GARWOOD, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Nafisa Ali, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions this court to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying her application for withholding or removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Ali argues that she demonstrated past persecution as a result of her activities in a political2

party. She also argues that the BIA failed to consider new evidence on a motion to remand and that the evidence supports her claim that she suffered persecution. We conclude from a review of the record that the IJ’s and the BIA’s determination is supported by substantial evidence, and the record does not compel a conclusion contrary to the IJ’s and the BIA’s denial of withholding of removal. See Roy v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 132, 138 (5th Cir. 2004); Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir. 2 002); 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(b). Ali has not separately briefed her claim for relief under the CAT, and that issue is therefore abandoned. See Roy, 389 F.3d at 138; Rodriguez v. INS, 9 F.3d 408, 414 n.15 (5th Cir. 1993). Ali (who has been represented by counsel throughout these proceedings) did not file a motion to remand (or to reopen) before the BIA as required by its rules; she merely included in her BIA brief, as an additional argument in support of her contention that she was entitled to withholding of removal, a reference to assertedly changed circumstances in Pakistan and allegedly supporting news articles and web page postings attached to that brief, most of which well predated the hearing before the IJ and

none of which tended to undermine the IJ’s findings that she had not suffered past persecution, that it was not likely that she would be persecuted on return to Pakistan (as her only political involvement had been minor and low level and she had not been3

politically active in any way for over eight years when she was only 20 years old); and that in any event she could avoid any such claimed danger by relocating within Pakistan. All this material

was before the BIA and there is nothing to indicate it did not give it such consideration as it deserved. Since there was no motion to remand a separate ruling expressly directed thereto was not required (or ever requested). The petition for review is DENIED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.29 Director Compensation During the fourth quarter of 2004 and January of 2005, the Board of Directors of Midwest Banc
Holdings, Inc. or its subsidiary, Midwest Bank and Trust Company, established directors fees for
2005 for non-officer directors as follows: Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
    
    Midwest Bank and Trust CompanyBoard Meetings:
    
    $1,000 per meeting attended
    
    $1,000 per meeting attendedCommittee Meetings:
    
    $750 per meeting attended for Audit
Committee members
    
    $500 per meeting attended
for Loan Committee members$500 per meeting attended for
Corporate Governance Committee
members
    
    $300 per quarter for Risk
Management members$500 per meeting attended for
Compensation Committee members$500 per meeting attended for
Nominating Committee membersAnnual Retainer:
    
    $15,000 for Board
    
    $4,000 for Board$18,000 for Audit Committee Chairman