Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 209 / Friday, October 27, 2000 / Notices 64435

(Northwest) tendered for filing as part of

its FERC Gas Tariff, a number of tariff

sheets which apply to the period from

February 1, 1996 through February 28,

1997 during which Northwest’s rates as

established in Docket No. RP95–409 are

applicable. The specific tariff sheets are

enumerated in Appendix A of the filing.

Northwest states that the purpose of

this filing is to comply with the

Commission’s June 1, 1999 and

September 29, 2000 orders in Docket

No. RP95–409 (Orders).

Northwest states that its compliance

filing is consistent with the

Commission’s Orders and directives that

have been issued with respect to the

Docket No. RP95–409 proceeding.

Northwest states that a copy of this

filing has been served upon each person

designated on the official service list

compiled by the Secretary in this

proceeding.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with Section

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests must be

filed in accordance with Section

154.210 of the Commission’s

Regulations. Protests will be considered

by the Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceedings. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room This filing may

be viewed on the web at http://

www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call

202–208–2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–27621 Filed 10–26–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. ER01–111–000, et al.]

Cinergy Services, Inc., et al.; Electric

Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings

October 19, 2000.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER01–111–000]

Take notice that on October 13, 2000,

Cinergy Services, Inc. (Cinergy) and

Northern/AES Energy, L.L.C., are

requesting a cancellation of Service

Agreement No. 99, under Cinergy

Operating Companies, Resale of

Transmission Rights and Ancillary

Service Rights, FERC Electric Tariff

Original Volume No. 8.

Cinergy requests an effective date of

October 9, 2000.

Comment date: November 3, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Commonwealth Edison Company

[Docket No. ER01–125–000]

Take notice that on October 16, 2000,

Commonwealth Edison Company

(ComEd), tendered for filing an

Interconnection Agreement with Duke

Energy Lee, LLC (Duke).

ComEd requests an effective date of

October 17, 2000 and accordingly seeks

waiver of the Commission’s notice

requirements.

Copies of the filing were served on

Duke and the Illinois Commerce

Commission.

Comment date: November 6, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.

[Docket No. ER01–128–000]

Take notice that on October 16, 2000,

PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM),

tendered for filing first revised sheet No.

87U to its Open Access Transmission

Tariff containing revisions to the ‘‘PJM

Assignment Matrix’’ which governs the

assignment of costs from PJM’s various

internal divisions to PJM’s unbundled

services. PJM states that the revisions

are necessary to reflect an internal

reorganization of PJM.

Copies of this filing were served upon

the PJM Members, and the state electric

utility regulatory commissions within

the PJM control area.

Comment date: November 6, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Consolidated Edison Company of

New York, Inc.

[Docket No. ER01–129–000]

Take notice that on October 16, 2000,

Consolidated Edison Company of New

York, Inc. (Con Edison), tendered for

filing a Supplement to its Rate

Schedule, Con Edison Rate Schedule

FERC No. 130, a facilities agreement

with the New York Power Authority

(NYPA).

Con Edison has requested that the

Supplement take effect as of September

1, 2000.

Con Edison states that a copy of this

filing has been served by mail upon

NYPA.

Comment date: November 6, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Consolidated Edison Company of

New York, Inc.

[Docket No. ER01–130–000]

Take notice that on October 16, 2000,

Consolidated Edison Company of New

York, Inc. (Con Edison), tendered for

filing a Supplement to its Rate Schedule

FERC 117, an agreement to provide

interconnection and transmission

service to Keyspan/Long Island Power

Authority (Keyspan). The Supplement

provides for a decrease in the annual

fixed rate carrying charges.

Con Edison has requested that this

decrease take effect as of September 1,

2000.

Con Edison states that a copy of this

filing has been served by mail upon

Keyspan.

Comment date: November 6, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER01–131–000]

Take notice that on October 13, 2000,

Cinergy Services, Inc. (Cinergy) and

American Energy Trading, Inc., are

requesting a cancellation of Service

Agreement No. 135, under Cinergy

Operating Companies, Market-Based

Power Sales Tariff—MB, FERC Electric

Tariff Original Volume No. 7.

Cinergy requests an effective date of

October 16, 2000.

Comment date: November 6, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER01–132–000]

Take notice that on October 13, 2000,

Cinergy Services, Inc. (Cinergy) and

American Energy Trading, Inc.,

tendered for filing a request for

cancellation of Service Agreement No.

135, under Cinergy Operating

Companies, Cost-Based Power Sales

Tariff—CB, FERC Electric Tariff Original

Volume No. 6.

Cinergy requests an effective date of

October 16, 2000.

Comment date: November 6, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER01–133–000]

Take notice that on October 16, 2000,

Cinergy Services, Inc. (Cinergy) and

South Jersey Energy Company are

requesting a cancellation of Service

Agreement No. 214, under Cinergy

Operating Companies, Market-Based

64436 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 209 / Friday, October 27, 2000 / Notices

Power Sales Tariff—MB, FERC Electric

Tariff Original Volume No. 7.

Cinergy requests an effective date of

October 16, 2000.

Comment date: November 6, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER01–134–000]

Take notice that on October 16, 2000,

Cinergy Services, Inc. (Cinergy) and

South Jersey Energy Company tendered

for filing a request for cancellation of

Service Agreement No. 211, under

Cinergy Operating Companies, CostBased Power Sales Tariff—CB, FERC

Electric Tariff Original Volume No. 6.

Cinergy requests an effective date of

October 16, 2000.

Comment date: November 6, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. Pacific Gas and Electric Company

[Docket No. ER01–135–000]

Take notice that on October 16, 2000,

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

(PG&E) tendered for filing a Generator

Special Facilities Agreement (GSFA)

between PG&E and Sunrise

Cogeneration and Power Company

(Sunrise) providing for Special Facilities

and the parallel operation of Sunrise’s

generating facility and the PG&E-owned

electric system.

This GSFA permits PG&E to recover

the ongoing costs associated with

owning, operating and maintaining the

Special Facilities including the cost of

any alterations and additions. As

detailed in the GSFA, PG&E proposes to

charge Sunrise a monthly Cost of

Ownership Charge equal to the rate for

transmission-level, customer-financed

facilities in PG&E’s currently effective

Electric Rule 2, as filed with the

California Public Utilities Commission

(CPUC). PG&E’s currently effective rate

of 0.31% for transmission-level,

customer-financed Special Facilities is

contained in the CPUC’s Advice Letter

1960–G/1587–E, effective August 5,

1996, a copy of which is included in

this filing.

Copies of this filing have been served

upon Sunrise and the CPUC.

Comment date: November 6, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. Delta Person Limited Partnership

[Docket No. ER01–138–000]

Take notice that on October 16, 2000,

Delta Person Limited Partnership

(Delta), tendered for filing Notice of

Succession pursuant to Section 35.16 of

the Commission’s Regulations. As a

result of a name change, Delta is

succeeding to the FERC Electric Rate

Schedule No. 1 of Cobisa-Person

Limited Partnership, effective

September 25, 2000.

Comment date: November 6, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER01–139–000]

Take notice that on October 16, 2000,

Cinergy Services, Inc. (Cinergy),

tendered for filing the following: (1) A

Notice of Letter of Acquisition of Merger

of Citizens Power LLC into Edison

Mission Marketing & Trading; (2) a

Notice of Name Change from Amoco

Energy Trading Corporation to BP

Energy Company; (3) a Notice of Name

Change from Williams Energy Services

Company to Williams Energy Marketing

& Trading Company; and (4) a Notice of

Name Change from Engage Energy US,

L.P. to Coastal Merchant Energy, L.P.

Cinergy respectfully requests waiver

of any applicable regulation to the

extent necessary to make the tariff

changes effective as of the date of each

of the listed name changes.

A copy of the filing was served upon

the affected parties.

Comment date: November 6, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

13. New York Independent System

Operator, Inc.

[Docket Nos. ER00–3591–000 and ER00–

3591–001]

Take notice that on October 16, 2000,

Enron Power Marketing, Inc. (EPMI)

filed a non-substantive correction to a

sentence in the prior version of the

affidavit of Scott Englander in order to

clarify its meaning.

Comment date: November 6, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

14. PPM One LLC

[Docket No. EG01–5–000]

Take notice that on October 16, 2000,

PPM One LLC filed with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission an

Application for Determination of

Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

pursuant to Part 365 of the

Commission’s Regulations and Section

32 of the Public Utility Holding

Company Act of 1935, as amended. The

applicant, a limited liability company

organized under the laws of the State of

Oregon, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of

PacifiCorp Power Marketing, Inc.

PacifiCorp Power Marketing, Inc., an

Oregon corporation, is a wholly-owned

subsidiary of PacifiCorp Group

Holdings, Inc., an Oregon corporation

with general offices in Portland, Oregon.

PacifiCorp Group Holdings, Inc. is, in

turn, a wholly-owned subsidiary of

PacifiCorp, an Oregon corporation and

an investor owned electric utility

company with general offices in

Portland, Oregon. PacifiCorp is a

subsidiary of ScottishPower plc, a

public limited corporation organized

under the laws of Scotland.

ScottishPower holds, through

subsidiaries, all of the common stock of

PacifiCorp. The applicant states that it

will be engaged directly and exclusively

in the business of owning an eligible

facility and selling at wholesale at

market-based rates electric energy from

the Facility. The facility consists of

three NEG Micon Model NM 700/44

Wind Turbines and related plant

facilities located on the Bureau of Land

Management rights-of-way in Riverside

County, California.

Copies of the application have been

served upon the California Public

Utilities Commission, the Oregon Public

Utility Commission, the Washington

Utilities and Transportation

Commission, the Idaho Public Utilities

Commission, the Public Service

Commission of Utah and the Wyoming

Public Service Commission, the

‘‘Affected State commissions,’’ and the

Securities and Exchange Commission.

Comment date: November 9, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest such filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 385.214). All such motions or

protests should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of these filings are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection. This filing may also be

viewed on the Internet at http://

www.ferc.fed.us/ online/rims.htm (call

202–208–2222 for assistance). Beginning

November 1, 2000, comments and

protests may be filed electronically via

the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 209 / Friday, October 27, 2000 / Notices 64437

CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the

instructions on the Commission’s web

site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/

doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–27619 Filed 10–26–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. PL98–1–001]

Public Access to Information and

Electronic Filing; Notice of Electronic

Filing Demonstrations

October 19, 2000.

Take notice that the Commission Staff

(Staff) will conduct demonstrations for

filing comments electronically

(excluding comments on rulemakings).

The electronic filing demonstrations

will be held following the Commission

meetings on October 25, 2000 and

November 8, 2000.

The demonstration on October 25,

2000 will be held in Hearing Room 1

and the demonstration on November 8

will be held in the Commission Meeting

Room at the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426.

The electronic filing demonstrations

are open to all interested persons.

The Capitol Connection will offer the

electronic filing demonstration on

November 8, 2000, as a special FERC

meeting, live over the Internet as well as

via telephone and satellite. For a

reasonable fee, you can receive the

demonstration in your office, at home or

anywhere in the world. To find out

more about The Capitol Connection’s

live Internet, phone bridge or satellite

coverage, contact David Reininger or

Julia Morelli at (703) 993–3100 or visit

Capital Connection’s website at

www.capitolconnection.gmu.edu). The

Capitol Connection also offers FERC

Open Meetings through its Washington,

DC area television service.

David Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–27620 Filed 10–26–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[ER–FRL–6612–1]

Environmental Impact Statements;

Notice of Availability

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal

Activities, General Information (202)

564–7167, or www.epa.gov/oeca/ofa,

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact

Statements, Filed October 16, 2000

Through October 20, 2000, Pursuant to

40 CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 000363, Draft EIS, AFS, MT,

Ashland, Post-Fire Project, Proposal

to Implement Restoration Activities to

Maintain Watershed Custer National

Forest Powder River and Rosebud

Counties, MT, Due: December 11,

2000, Contact: Elizabeth McFarland

(406) 784–2344.

EIS No. 000364, Final EIS, COE, CA,

Upper Newport Bay Restoration

Project To Develop a Long-Term

Management Plan to Control

Sediment Deposition Orange County,

CA, Due: November 27, 2000, Contact:

Larry Smith (213) 452–3846.

EIS No. 000365, Final EIS, FHW, WV,

VA, WV–9 Improvements, from

Charles Town Bypass (U.S. 340) to the

Virginia Line, Funding and COE

Section 404 Permit, Shenandoah

River, Jefferson Co., WV and Loudoun

Co., VA, Due: December 04, 2000,

Contact: Thomas J. Smith (304) 347–

5928.

EIS No. 000366, Final EIS, COE, CA,

Santa Ana River Mainstem Project

Including Santiago Creek, Proposal to

Complete Channel Improvements

along San Timoteo Creek Reach 3B to

provide Flood Protection, San

Bernardino County, CA, Due:

November 27, 2000, Contact: Joy

Jaiswal (213) 452–3871.

EIS No. 000367, Final EIS, COE, NC,

Dare County Beaches (Bodie Island

Portion) Hurricane Wave Protection

and Beach Erosion Control, The towns

of Nags Head, Kill Devil Hills, Kitty

Hawk, Dare County, NC, Due:

November 27, 2000, Contact: Chuck

Wilson (910) 251–4746.

EIS No. 000368, Final EIS, COE, AZ, Rio

de Flag Flood Control Study,

Improvement Flood Protection, City

of Flagstaff, Coconino County, AZ,

Due: November 27, 2000, Contact:

Tim Smith (202) 761–4172.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 000307, Draft EIS, FRC, AL, FL,

Buccaneer Natural Gas Pipeline

Project, Construction and Operations,

To Deliver Natural Gas for Electric

Power Generation, Mobile County, AL

and Pasco, Polk, Hardee, Lake and

Osceola Counties, FL, Due: November

07, 2000, Contact: Paul McKee (202)

208–1611.

Revision of FR notice published on

09/08/2000: CEQ Comment Date has

been Extended from 10/24/2000 to 11/

07/2000.

Dated: October 24, 2000.

Ken Mittelholtz,

Environmental Protection Specialist, Office

of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 00–27677 Filed 10–26–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[ER–FRL–6611–2]

Environmental Impact Statements and

Regulations; Availability of EPA

Comments

Availability of EPA comments

prepared pursuant to the Environmental

Review Process (ERP), under Section

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental

Policy Act as amended. Requests for

copies of EPA comments can be directed

to the Office of Federal Activities at

(202) 564–7167. An explanation of the

ratings assigned to draft environmental

impact statements (EISs) was published

in FR dated April 14, 2000 (65 FR

20157).

Draft EISs

ERP No. D–COE–H36109–MO Rating

EO2, Chesterfield Valley Flood Control

Study, Improvement Flood Protection,

City of Chesterfield, St. Louis County,

MO.

Summary: EPA raised objections,

noting that significant floodplain

management issues exist. EPA

encouraged the Corps to reevaluate

alternatives to lessen impacts.

ERP No. D–COE–K36134–CA Rating 3,

Murrieta Creek Flood Control and

Protection, Implementation, Riverside

County, CA.

Summary: EPA stated that the draft

EIS failed to adequately assess

potentially significant environmental

impacts of the proposed project. EPA

believes that the proposed project

would result in significant unmitigated

impacts to wetlands and other waters of

the U.S., important wildlife habitat, and

air quality and that alternatives exist

that would reduce these impacts,

provide flood protection, and restore

and enhance Murrieta Creek within the

proposed project area. EPA has

determined that this project as proposed

is not consistent with or otherwise in