alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3256 

Making continuing appropriations for all departments and agencies of the 

Federal Government, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 5, 2013 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

Making continuing appropriations for all departments and 

agencies of the Federal Government, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal Sanity Act for 

5 Appropriations’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS. 

7 There is hereby appropriated for 300 days after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act— 

9 (1) for each project or activity for which budget 

10 authority was provided in the Consolidated and FurVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:42 Oct 06, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3256.IH H3256

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3256 IH

1 ther Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (Public 

2 Law 113–6), an amount equal to the budget author3 ity provided in such Act, as reduced pursuant to the 

4 Presidential sequestration order dated March 1, 

5 2013, to remain available for a comparable period of 

6 availability; and 

7 (2) for entitlements and other mandatory pay8 ments whose budget authority was provided in ap9 propriations Acts for fiscal year 2013, and for activi10 ties under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, such 

11 amounts as may be necessary to maintain program 

12 levels as they existed on September 30, 2013. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32(i)**

****

**CERTIFICATION**

******PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connect with the quarterly
report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended August 31, 2005 to be filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas P. Taylor, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.



|Date: October 13, 2005 | By: | /s/ Douglas P. Taylor                     
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                       |     | Douglas P. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27599]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Thursday, November 9, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference 
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb
Secretary of the Commission
[FR Doc. 00-27599 Filed 10-23-00; 4:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

Darrin J. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer and Peter T. Reno, Vice President
and Interim Chief Financial Officer of Anchor Glass Container Corporation,
hereby certify that:

      1.    The annual report of the registrant on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the annual report.

Date:  March 29, 2005

/s/ Darrin J. Campbell
--------------------------------------
Name: Darrin J. Campbell
Title:  Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Peter T. Reno
--------------------------------------
Name: Peter T. Reno
Title:  Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Gregory J. Halpern, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Z Trim Holdings, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report my conclusions  about the  effectiveness
of the  disclosure  controls and  procedures  based on my  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on my most recent  evaluation,  to the  registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's  board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were  significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.

Date:  April 2, 2007
                                                   /S/  GREGORY J. HALPERN
                                                   -------------------------
                                                   Gregory J. Halpern
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1







Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, each hereby certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











By:   /s/  Harold K. Fletcher


Harold K. Fletcher


CEO





/s/  Joseph P. Macaluso


Joseph P. Macaluso


Principal Accounting Officer





November 12, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp and will be retained by Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37,996]

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on August 21, 2000, in response to a worker petition which was filed by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Lodge 1432, on behalf of workers at Consolidated Metco, Inc., Rivergate Plant, Portland, Oregon.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 12th day of October 2000.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-27570 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 23

- 10270 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus AKOHOMEN IGHEDOISE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:15

- cr

- 00320

- SDM

- MRM

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-10270 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 01/29/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 23

- 10270

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Akohomen Ighedoise in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967) . Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Ighed oise’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED

. 1

1 Ighedoise’s motions for appointment of counsel and to proceed in forma pauperis are DENIED. USCA11 Case: 23-10270 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 01/29/2024 Page: 2 of 2
#### ANDERSON v. STATE.

No. 23380.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 5, 1946.

J. H. Axelrod, of Houston, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for unlawfully carrying a pistol, the punishment assessed being confinement in the county jail for one month.

The complaint and information properly charge the offense. The record before this court contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                            SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


HORIZON OFFSHORE CONTRACTORS, LTD.
(CAYMAN EXEMPTED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

HORIZON GROUP L.D.C.
(CAYMAN EXEMPTED LIMITED DURATION COMPANY)

HORIZON VESSELS, INC.
(DELAWARE CORPORATION)

HORIZON OFFSHORE CONTRACTORS, INC.
(DELAWARE CORPORATION)

HORIZON SUBSEA SERVICES, INC.
(DELAWARE CORPORATION)

HORIZON OFFSHORE NIGERIA LTD.
(NIGERIAN CORPORATION)

HORIZON VESSELS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
(CAYMAN EXEMPTED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

PT HORIZON OFFSHORE INDONESIA
(INDONESIAN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

TIBURON INGENIERIA Y CONSTRUCCION S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
(MEXICAN L.L.C.)

HORIZEN, L.L.C.
(DELAWARE L.L.C.)

HORIZON OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL LTD.
(CAYMAN EXEMPTED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

HORIZON MARINE CONSTRUCTION LTD.
(CAYMAN EXEMPTED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

AFFILIATED MARINE CONTRACTORS , INC.
(DELAWARE CORPORATION)

TEXAS OFFSHORE CONTRACTORS, INC.
(DELAWARE CORPORATION)

PROGRESSIVE PIPELINE CONTRACTORS, INC.
(DELAWARE CORPORATION)

HORIZON OFFSHORE PTE. LTD.
(SINGAPORE CORPORATION)

HORIZON OFFSHORE CONTRACTORS (MAURITIUS) LTD.
(MAURITIUS OFFSHORE COMPANY)

HORIZON MARINE CONTRUCTION (MAURITIUS) LTD.
(MAURITIUS OFFSHORE COMPANY)
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61856-61857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24457]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Bioenergy Technologies Office: Waste to Energy Roadmapping 
Workshop

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of 
Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting: Waste to Energy Roadmapping Workshop.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) today gives notice of a 
workshop hosted by the Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) to discuss 
the current state of technology and efforts needed to achieve 
affordable, scalable, and sustainable drop-in hydrocarbon biofuels 
derived from waste feedstocks.

DATES: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 8:30 a.m.--5:00 p.m.; Thursday, 
November 6, 2014 9:00 a.m.--12:00 noon.

ADDRESSES: DoubleTree Hotel, 300 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions may be directed to--Aaron 
Fisher at (410) 953-6231 or by email at aaron.fisher@ee.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this workshop is to bring 
together waste-to-energy experts to identify key technical barriers to 
the commercial deployment of liquid transportation fuels from waste 
feedstocks, and ultimately develop a roadmap which highlights the key 
pathways and metrics to meeting this goal. Participants will be led in 
facilitated breakout sessions to address anaerobic digestion, 
hydrothermal liquefaction, and other processes from feedstock streams 
consisting of wastewater residuals, biosolids, foodstuffs, and organic 
municipal solid

[[Page 61857]]

waste. These discussions will lead to a roadmap that will be a 
synthesized output from the information gathered at the workshop.

    Issued in Golden, CO on September 15, 2014.
Nicole Blackstone,
Contracting Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-24457 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
UN I TE D ST AT ES D I STR I CT C OU RT F O R T H E D IS T R IC T O F C O LU M B IA

____________________________________ ) UN I TE D ST AT ES O F AM ERI CA ) ) v . ) ) Cr im in al N o. 05 -03 70 (P L F) DAVI D HOSSEI

N SAFAV I AN, ) ) De fe nd ant. ) ____________________________________)
MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON AND ORDER On Marc h 18, 2009, counsel for the def endant wr ote a letter

to the Court in order to b ri ngto t

he Court ’s atte nti on

a re c e nt p ote nti a lly

re le va nt c ourt de c isi on . In a dd iti on

to s imp ly transmitting the de cision, howeve r, counse l made ar g uments with respec t to that decision.

On Ap ri l 22 , 2 00 9, in r e sp on se to a re qu e st b y

the Court , th e pa

rt ie s jo int ly

se nt a letter to the Court identifying r eleva nt pag es fr om ear lier filed br iefs in support of their r espec tive positions on t he issue of vindictive pr osecution. In addition to respondingto the Court’s direc t
re qu e st, ho we ve r, the pa

rt ie s se t f or th l e g a l argume nts wi th r e sp e c t to thi s is su e . O n th e same date , Apr il 2 2, 20 09 , th e g ov e rnme nt s ub mitte d it s o wn le tte r, c iti ngc a se s a

nd makin gargume nts with respec t to its rea ding of the ca ses and their

application to the issues bef ore this Court. On Ap ri l 24 , 2 00 9, de fe ns e c ouns e l se nt a le tte r t o th e Court

re sp on din gto t

he le g a l argume nts prese nted by

the g overnme nt in its April 22 letter a nd citing a dditional authorities. Whil e one of

the four le tters submitted by counsel wa s in direct re sponse to a
re qu e st f ro m th e Court , th e oth e r t hr e e we re no t; a

nd e ve n th e on e tha

t w a s r e sp on siv e we nt w e ll beyond the Court’s re quest to identify pag es fr om briefs a

nd case s not previously

cited. Counsel2

are reminded that the Rules of this Court prohibitcommunications with the Court throug h letters rathe r than through formal f ilings. See L . Crim. R. 49.1(b) (“Except whe n reque sted by a judg e,
corr espondenc e shall not be dire cted by the par ties or their attorney s to a judg e, nor sha ll papers be le ft wi th o r m a ile d to a

jud g e fo r f

ili ng ” ). F ur

the rm or e , whe n a

le tte r i s r e qu e ste d in

or de r t o bringto the Court’s attention supplemental authorities, while the letter may provide such authorities and state the re asons for pr oviding them, it may not include leg al ar g ument. Cf. Fe d. R. App. P. 28 (j). In any

event, c ounsel are advised that the le tters they have submitted will not be docke ted and, while the Court will in t his instance conside r the a rguments made ther ein, they
are no t a pa rt of the fo rm a l r e c or d in

thi s c a se and

wi ll n ot b e a

pa rt of the re c or d th at w ill
a c c o mp an y th e c a s e t o th e c o urto f a p p e a l s s h o u l d

ana p p e a l p r o v e n e c e s s ar

y. SO ORDERED. /s/_______________________ PAULL . FRI EDMAN DA T E : M ay

1 , 2 0 0 9 Un i t edS t at es Di s tri ctJ u d ge
Exhibit 10.36
The following table sets forth the current annual base salaries of our named executive officers:                                Maynard Jenkins  Chairman & Chief Executive Officer  $800,000      Martin Fraser  President & Chief Operating Officer  $400,000      Larry L. Buresh  Sr. VP & Chief Information Officer  $275,000      Don Watson  Sr. VP & Chief Financial Officer  $280,000      Dale D. Ward  EVP — Commercial Operations  $295,144   
On May 25, 2004, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (“CompensationCommittee”) approved and adopted the 2004 General and Administrative Staff Incentive Plan (the“2004 Plan”), which is intended to provide eligible associates, including the Company’s officers(excluding the Chairman and CEO and President and COO, discussed below), with an opportunity todirectly share in the success of the Company by paying them cash bonuses for outstandingindividual, department and Company achievements during the 2004 fiscal year. Bonuses under the2004 Plan are payable if Company financial performance goals relating to specified earnings pershare (“EPS”); earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), and cashflow (“Cash Flow”), as well as individual performance goals, for fiscal 2004, are met. Bonusesrelative to Company performance goals are calculated utilizing predetermined percentages of theofficers’ salaries based on the amount by which the Company’s actual goal achievement exceeds thespecified targets. Bonuses relative to individual performance are awarded based on the level ofperformance determined to have been achieved by each officer. Messrs. Buresh, Watson and Ward areeligible to be awarded an annual incentive bonus under the 2004 Plan not to exceed 100% of theirrespective base salaries depending upon the levels of EPS, EBITDA and/or Cash Flow and individualperformance actually achieved.
On April 14, 2004, the Compensation Committee approved the Executive Incentive Program, which wasapproved by our stockholders in June 2004. The Executive Incentive Program provides the terms forincentive bonuses to be paid to the CEO and COO only, for fiscal 2004, based on the Company’sachievement of financial performance goals relative to the same EPS, EBITDA and the Cash Flowtargets as set forth under the 2004 Plan. Messrs. Jenkins and Fraser are eligible to be awarded anannual incentive bonus for fiscal 2004 under the Executive Incentive Program not to exceed 160% oftheir respective base salaries depending upon the levels of EPS, EBITDA and/or Cash Flow actuallyachieved.
Awards under the 2004 Plan and the Executive Incentive Program have not yet been determined by theCompensation Committee.
EX-10.39



 





Exhibit 10.39




Summary of Director and Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements




     In addition to the compensation arrangements filed as other exhibits to this annual report,
EnPro Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) has the following compensation arrangements with its
directors and named executive officers.



Compensation Arrangements for Directors




     EnPro Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) has an arrangement to pay non-employee members of the
Company’s board of directors compensation for their service on the board. Each non-employee member
of the Company’s board of directors receives an annual retainer of $63,000, $38,000 of which is
paid in cash and $25,000 of which is paid in phantom shares of our common stock for the first 10
years of a director’s service on the board. In addition, each non-employee director receives
$1,000 per meeting for each board and committee meeting attended (including telephonic meetings).
Meeting fees are paid to any non-employee director who attends a committee meeting, even if the
director does not serve on the committee. Each non-employee director who serves as a committee
chairman also receives an additional $4,000 annually, and the non-executive chairman of the board
receives an additional monthly fee of $15,000.



Compensation Arrangements for Named Executive Officers




     The Company’s chief executive officer and its four other most highly compensated executive
officers, based on 2005 base salaries and bonuses (such five officers, the “named executive
officers”), are all “at-will” employees who serve at the pleasure of the board of directors. The
board of directors sets the annual base salary for each of the named executive officers and has the
discretion to change the salary of any of the officers at any time. For 2006, the annual base
salaries for the named executive officers are as follows:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Named Executive Officer	 	Base Salary
	Ernest F. Schaub
	 	$	635,000	 
	William Dries
	 	$	332,000	 
	Richard L. Magee
	 	$	302,000	 
	Richard C. Driscoll
	 	$	292,000	 
	Wayne T. Byrne
	 	$	176,000