alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 206 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3230 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 4, 2013 

Received and read the first time 

OCTOBER 5, 2013 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

Making continuing appropriations during a Government shutdown to provide pay and allowances to members of the 

reserve components of the Armed Forces who perform 

inactive-duty training during such period. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3230 PCS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pay Our Guard and 

3 Reserve Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR PAY AND AL5 LOWANCES FOR CERTAIN RESERVE COMPO6 NENT MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—There are hereby appropriated for 

8 fiscal year 2014, out of any money in the Treasury not 

9 otherwise appropriated, for any period during which in10 terim or full-year appropriations for fiscal year 2014 are 

11 not in effect such sums as are necessary to provide pay 

12 and allowances to members of the reserve components of 

13 the Armed Forces (as named in section 10101 of title 10, 

14 United States Code) who perform inactive-duty training 

15 (as defined in section 101(d)(7) of such title) during such 

16 period. 

17 (b) TERMINATION.—Appropriations and funds made 

18 available and authority granted pursuant to this section 

19 shall be available until whichever of the following first oc20 curs: (1) the enactment into law of an appropriation (in21 cluding a continuing appropriation) for any purpose for 

22 which amounts are made available in this section; (2) the 

23 enactment into law of the applicable regular or continuing 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3230 PCS

1 appropriations resolution or other Act without any appro2 priation for such purpose; or (3) January 1, 2015. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 3, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 206 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3230 

AN ACT 

Making continuing appropriations during a Governsuch period. Forces who perform inactive-duty training during members of the reserve components of the Armed ment shutdown to provide pay and allowances to 

OCTOBER 5, 2013 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

 An executive/administration meeting for DoD Healthcare Quality Initiatives Review Panel has been scheduled for November 9 & 10, 2000.

# SUMMARY:

This notice set forth the meeting of the DoD Healthcare Quality Initiatives Review Panel. Notice of meeting is required under The Federal Advisory Committee Act.

# DATES:

November 9 & 10, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

Sheraton Crystal City, 1800 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Arlington, VA 22202.

*Time:*                         November 9th, 8:00 am to 5:30 pm; November 10th, 8:00 am to 5:30 pm.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gia Edmonds at (703) 933-8325.

Dated: September 20, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-27463  Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
### Gormas, Michael (OST)

From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

Follow Up Flag: Flag Status:

Dear Mr. Gormas, Rick Olson <citymagistrate@cityofpage.org> Monday, December 22, 2014 7:10 PM Gormas, Michael (OST) Bill Diak; Lana Shugart City of Page-EAS Extension

Follow up Completed

The City of Page does not have an objection to a four week EAS application extension calculated to provide interested carriers time to evaluate due diligence considerations.

Rick Olson Airport Director City of Page 928-660-2742

1 •..**~**....... 

### ... '.,,::: J,. ·'**~-** ., . .. ; . !""•

### BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Essential Air Service at 

### KINGMAN,ARIZONA PAGE, ARIZONA PRESCOTT,ARIZONA SHOWLOW, ARIZONA
Under49U.S.C. §41731 

### etseq. ) ) ) 

### ) Docket OST-1996-1899 ) Docket OST-1997-2694 ) Docket OST-1996-1899 ) Docket OST-1998-4409 ) )



### REQUEST FOR SUBMISSION DEADLINE EXTENTION BYMOKULELE FLIGHT SERVICE INC.
Correspondence with regard to this document should be addressedto:
Ron Hansen CEO Moku1ele Flight Service Inc. 73-350 U'u Street Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Telephone: 808-840-9002 Fax: 808-326-1266 Email: ron.hansen@mokulelehawaii.com

Moku1ele Flight Service Inc. respectfully requests a four week extension ofthe submission deadline date ofDecember 22, 2014 as set bythe Department ofTransportation in its' solicitation ofcarrier proposals in the above mentioned cities to on or about January 20, 2014 (as Monday January 19 is a Federal holiday). Mokulele requests the additional time to complete its necessary due diligence onthese markets and complete negotiations with potential codeshare partners and aircraft manufacturers. Submitted: December 19,2014
Ron Hansen CEO Mokulele Flight Service Inc.
*

The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-1464

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Arthur L. Ballard, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: September 10, 2002

Filed: September 19, 2002

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Arthur L. Ballard appeals his 24-month sentence for conviction of conspiracy

to commit bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1344 (2000). Ballard

contends the district court*

 should not have held him liable for the entire amount of

the loss caused by the conspiracy ($64,591.55), but only for the $7,800 loss he

directly caused. We disagree. The total loss of $64,591.55 resulted from “reasonably

foreseeable acts . . . of others in furtherance of the jointly undertaken criminal
-2-

activity.” U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.3(a)(1)(B) (2001). Ballard

“‘benefitted from his co-conspirator’s activities,’” he “‘demonstrated a substantial

level of commitment to the conspiracy,’” and he knew the “acts of fraud committed

by [one other co-conspirator] were remarkably similar” to his own. United States v.

Bad Wound, 203 F.3d 1072, 1076-77 (8th Cir. 2000) (quoting United States v. Brown,

148 F.3d 1003, 1008 (8th Cir. 1998)). Thus, the district court did not commit error

when it held Ballard responsible for the entire loss caused by the conspiracy and

sentenced him accordingly. 

Ballard raises two additional arguments. First, he argues the district court

should have sentenced him as a minor participant. Having reviewed the district

court’s factual findings about Ballard’s role in the conspiracy, we conclude the

findings are free from clear error. See United States v. Fellers, 285 F.3d 721, 726 (8th

Cir. 2002) (standard of review). Second, Ballard contends the district court

committed error by ordering his sentence to run consecutively to–rather than

concurrently with–a Missouri sentence for second-degree burglary. United States v.

Plumley, 207 F.3d 1086, 1093 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review). When Ballard

participated in the bank fraud conspiracy, he was on conditional release from serving

his sentence for burglary; the conspiracy conviction caused the conditional release to

be revoked. In this situation, the district court acted properly when it determined the

two sentences should run consecutively. U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3, cmt. n.6 (2001).

For the reasons stated above, we affirm Ballard’s sentence. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 21. SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        STATE OF
                   SUBSIDIARY                                         INCORPORATION
----------------------------------------------                        -------------
<S>                                                                   <C>
Getty Properties Corp.                                                  Delaware
AOC Transport, Inc.                                                     Delaware
Getty CT Leasing, Inc.                                                  New York
Getty NY Leasing, Inc.                                                  New York
Getty VA Leasing, Inc.                                                  New York
Getty TM Corp.                                                          Maryland
GettyMart Inc.                                                          Delaware
Leemilt's Flatbush Avenue, Inc.                                         New York
Leemilt's Petroleum, Inc.                                               New York
Slattery Group Inc.                                                    New Jersey
Power Test Realty Company Limited Partnership*                          New York
</TABLE>

*ninety-nine percent owned by the Company, representing the limited partner
units, and one percent owned by Getty Properties Corp., representing the general
partner interest.
CC Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc. 403-717-3898



Maxwell Batley 





































(1)

BRETT JULIAN NABARRO










(2)

PEACE ARCH FILMS LIMITED
















LEASE

of

Third Floor 5-11 Mortimer Street London W1 N 7RH
















Term

5 years

Commencing

1 December 2005

Rent

£32,960 p.a.





































MAXWELL BATLEY

27 Chancery Lane

LONDON WC2A IPA







































  
  	PARTICULARS
	DATE:	
      2005



  	
H.M. Land Registry 

    	Harrow
	Landlord's Title
      Number:	LN96651
	Administrative area:	Greater London
	Landlord:	Brett Julian Nabarro of Flat 5, 7 Bryanston Square, London W1H 2DH
	Tenant:	PEACE ARCH FILMS LIMITED whose registered office is at
      102 Deane Street London W1D 3TQ (Company Number 04682443)
	Premises:	Third Floor of the Building as shown edged green on Plan 1
	Building:	all that land and building known as 5-11
      Mortimer Street London W1 as shown edged red on Plan 2
	Contractual Term:	5 years from and
      including the Term Commencement Date subject to Tenant's right to break on
      the Break Date in accordance with the terms of this Lease
	Break Date:	1 December 2008
	Term Commencement Date:	1 December 2005
	Rent Commencement Date:	1 January 2006
	Rent:	the yearly rent of £32,960
      (THIRTY TWO THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND SIXTY POUNDS)
	Permitted Use:	Office use within
      Class B1, of the schedule to the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes)
      Order 1987
      2008

	Internal Decorating
      Year:	£3,863 for the first year of the Contractual Term then increasing
      annually in line by reference to increases in the Retail Prices (All
      Items)
	Service Charge:	Index


  


 

 

 




 


  
  	



Witness	



/s/Amy Mackie
	  	
	



Name (in BLOCK CAPITALS) 	



Amy Mackie
	



Address	



36 Dundonald Road

Nimbledow


SW19 3QN
	 	
	SIGNED AS A DEED by PEACE ARCH
    FILMS LIMITED by:	/s/Penny Wolf
	 	
		Penny Wolf
		Director









 


DATE:           December 2,
2005

 


LANDLORD:    BRETT JULIAN NABARRO of Flat 5, 7 Bryanston Square,
London W1H 2DH

 


TENANT:        PEACE ARCH FILMS LIMITED whose registered office is at 102 Deane Street 

                        London W 1 D 3TQ (Company Registration Number: 04682443) 


   

PREMISES:       The premises demised by the Lease and known as Third Floor, 5-11 Mortimer
Street London W1 

 

LEASE:            A lease dated 2
December 2005 between the Landlord (1) and the Tenant (2) by which the Premises  

                        were demised for a term of five (5) years commencing
on 1 December 2005
### Competence Center Analytics 

### 1st 

## Amendment to Final Report Final Report Characterization of , EFKA-3600N without DOA" Study No. 11 L00371 (confidential) Page 1 of 2 Test item Batch identification CAS no . Testing facility Study director Reason for the amendment , EFKA- 3600N without DOA" GK3365-09 9 without DOA 1334163-54-0 Competence Center Analytics , BAS F SE , D-67056 Ludwigshafe n Mr. Beringer , GKC/C- E210

The chemical structure is wrongly stated in the final report. Location of error in the final report Page 1, line ,Chemical structure" Corrected version

# 0 l...... CH 3 

# st

k··.. .. . .. .... . .......... .... ...
_ }/pv._ 

# ls. . f

.

# 2a**~;:**

# . . ....... (Mr. Beringer)Competence Center Analytics 1st Amendment to Final Report Final Report Characterization of "EFKA-3600N without DOA" Study No. 11L00371 (confidential) 

### Statement of 

### the Quality Assurance Unit 

# D• BASF The Chemical Company Page 2 of2

The Quality Assurance Unit inspects the laboratories of the department Competence Center Analytics in regular intervals . Besides these general inspections we inspected the following items of this study in accordance with the OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice and the GLP Principles of the German "Chemikaliengesetz" (Chemicals Act). F indings are reported to study director and to management.

Verification of study plan: Sep 12,2011 Inspection of Date of inspection Reported to study director and to management Conduct of study: Molecular mass distribution Sep 14 , 2011 Sep21 , 2011 Headspace GC (n-butyl acrylate, iso-butyl Oct 18, 2011 Oct 20 , 2011 methacrylate and perfluorohexylethyl methacrylate) Raw data: Nov 08, 2011 Nov 17, 2011 F inal report: Nov 08, 2011 Nov 17,2011 1 st Amendment to final report: Nov 29, 2011 Nov 29 , 2011
The final report reflects the raw data.

Ludwigshafen

# ~~**a;lfM~~er-Schlieker** ____ d(fz_C!_

_ d!_.f,___**tJ**

## /7' Date
**Exhibit 32.02****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Viseon, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (“Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifiespursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to my knowledge:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     */s/ Brian R. Day*       Brian R. Day    Chief Financial Officer  Date: November 14, 2005     This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 be deemed tobe filed by the Company pursuant to Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of Personnel Management has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a request for clearance of a revised information collection. The model Combined Federal Campaign application and instructions is used to collect information from charitable organizations applying for eligibility. 

We estimate 1400 Applications are completed annually. Each form takes approximately 3 hours to complete. The annual estimated burden is 4200 hours. 

Comments are particularly invited on: 
      - Whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of the Office of       ( print page 63903)                              Personnel Management, and whether it will have practical utility;                     
      - Whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; and
      - Ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, through use of the appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on 202/606-8358, or E-mail to mbtoomey@opm.gov. 

Comments on this proposal should be received within 10 calendar days from the date of this publication. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send or deliver comments to: 

Mara T. Patermaster, Office of Extragovernmental Affairs, CFC Operations, US Office of Personnel Management, 1900 “E” Street, NW, Room 5450, Washington, DC 20415 

   and 

Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, NW, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

Office of Personnel Management. 

Janice R. Lachance, 

Director.

[FR Doc. 00-27326 Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325-01-P
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Brian R. Ervine, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Evolving Systems, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 31, 2005

/s/
Brian R. Ervine
Brian R. Ervine
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
From: Newberg, Cindy

Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 8:25 AM

To: Thomas, Amanda

Cc: Schillo, Bruce; Hufford, Drusilla Subject: RE: Following up

- floatation foam

Hi Amanda

–

We cannot accept the edits. This has been raised in my chain and with OGC. We can accept the original language I sent or with the edits in the brackets shown below:

On that basis, EPA is modifying the following listings by sector and end

- use as of the dates indicated. EPA will continue to monitor the development and de ployment of other alternatives as well as their uptake by industries affected by today’s action. If EPA receives new information indicating that other alternatives will not be available [for one or more end uses] by the change of status dates specified, E PA may propose further action to adjust the relevant dates [for those end uses].

Please let me know how you want to proceed.

Best

Cindy
#### RANDELL v. STATE.

No. 26311.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 1, 1953.

*412No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful possession of whiskey for the purpose of sale in a dry area, with a prior offense alleged to enhance the punishment; the punishment, six months in jail and a fine of $300.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1NO. 07-10-0366-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

MARCH 30, 2011

______________________________

DAVID ANASTACIO MARQUEZ, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

NO. A17778-0809; HONORABLE ROBERT W. KINKAID, JR., JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J. and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

**DISSENTING OPINION**

****The majority finds that Appellant's prior plea agreement and plea are evidence of his financial ability to pay $337.50 of the $637.50 in court-appointed attorney's fees.  I respectfully disagree.

Contracting to pay a debt and having the actual ability to pay a debt are two entirely different concepts.  Our jurisprudence is replete with examples of people who contracted to pay a debt but were unable to fulfill that obligation.  

Furthermore, the determination of an ability to pay must be made at the time of the assessment.  The ability to pay at some past or future point in time is no evidence of Appellant's present ability to pay.  Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.05(g) (West Supp. 2010).  Because I would reform the judgment to find no attorney's fees were properly assessable, I respectfully dissent.

  Patrick A. Pirtle 

       Justice

Do not publish.

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO WAO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

vs.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00454-ADA

ORDER SETTING MOTION HEARING HEARING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

MOTION HEARING by Zoomoom on Tuesday, March 30, 2021 at 10:00 AM.

set

IT 26th day of March, 2021.

Alan D Albright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 6:20-cv-00454-ADA Document 65 Filed 03/26/21 Page 1 of 1