alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3207 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the method of determining 

whether Filipino veterans are United States residents for purposes of 

eligibility for receipt of the full-dollar rate of compensation under the 

laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2013 

Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ (for himself, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Ms. 

DUCKWORTH, Mr. ENYART, Ms. HANABUSA, Mr. HONDA, Mr. SABLAN, 

Mr. VARGAS, Mr. LOWENTHAL, and Mrs. BUSTOS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the method 

of determining whether Filipino veterans are United 

States residents for purposes of eligibility for receipt 

of the full-dollar rate of compensation under the laws 

administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Benefits Fairness for 

5 Filipino Veterans Act of 2013’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 3207 IH

1 SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN FILI2 PINO VETERANS FOR FULL-DOLLAR RATE OF 

3 BENEFITS UNDER THE LAWS ADMINISTERED 

4 BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

5 Section 107(c) of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: 

7 ‘‘The Secretary may not determine that a person is not 

8 an individual residing in the United States for purposes 

9 of this subsection solely because the person is outside the 

10 United States for any period of time less than one year.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2988 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the definition 

of full-time employee for purposes of the employer mandate in the Patient 

Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2013 

Mr. LIPINSKI (for himself, Mr. BARROW of Georgia, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. 

MATHESON, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. PETERSON, and Mr. SCHRADER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the definition of full-time employee for purposes of the 

employer mandate in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Forty Hours Is Full 

5 Time Act of 2013’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2988 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF FULL-TIME EMPLOYEE. 

2 Section 4980H(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

3 1986 is amended— 

4 (1) in paragraph (2)(E), by striking ‘‘by 120’’ 

5 and inserting ‘‘by 174’’; and 

6 (2) in paragraph (4)(A) by striking ‘‘30 hours’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘40 hours’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Ex parte BOATWRIGHT.

No. 24349.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 23, 1949.

Eugene C. Williams, Sam L. Harrison and Joe Burkett, all of San Antonio, for-appellant.

M. C. Gonzales, Asst. Criminal Dist.. Atty., of San Antonio, and Ernest S.. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the-State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant, who is in custody of the Sheriff of Bexar County under and by virtue-of a capias based on an indictment returned against him by the grand jury of said county wherein he is charged with the murder of Arnie Roy Surrency, applied to the Honorable W. jW. McCrory, Judge of the Criminal District Court of Bexar County,. *857for a writ of habeas corpus, seeking his release from custody on bail. The writ was issued as prayed for and, upon a hearing thereof, he was remanded to the custody of the sheriff without the benefit of ibail. From said order he prosecuted an appeal to this court.

It seems to be appellant’s contention that unless express malice ,is shown, he is entitled to bail as a matter of law. If he claims that express malice by word of mouth must be shown in order to justify denial of bail, then every mute person who committed murder would be entitled to bail, no matter in how wilful, wanton, and malicious a manner the killing may have been committed.

Murder is classed as a capital offense; and when the immediate facts sur-sounding the killing are such that if the law were properly enforced, and that a dispassionate jury would impose capital punishment, bail may be denied.

In the instant case, the proof is evident that appellant committed murder and the facts surrounding the killing, as disclosed by the record, show that appellant with a cool, calm, and sedate mind inflicted seven bullet wounds; the first of which were inflicted in the cafe, and after the injured party had crawled to the door and had fallen on the sidewalk, he deliberately approached the helpless person and shot him again.

In the case of Ex parte Rothschild, 2 Tex.App. 560, 587, there was no evidence of threats, former grudges, or ill will, yet the record disclosed facts that showed a deliberately formed design to commit murder, and this court held that a denial of 'bail was justified by the facts of the case.

It is our opinion that under the facts of this case, the trial court was justified in remanding appellant without benefit of bail. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed. ■<

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
H. R. 3302 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen 

An Act 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Bay Pines, Florida, 

as the ‘‘C.W. Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL 

CENTER, BAY PINES, FLORIDA. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Bay 

Pines, Florida, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act 

be known and designated as the ‘‘C.W. Bill Young Department 

of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. Any reference to such medical 

center in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other 

paper of the United States shall be considered to be a reference 

to the C.W. Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

Center. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 209 (Friday, October 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3290]


State of Montana; Amendment #2

    In accordance with a notice received from the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, dated September 26, 2000, the above-numbered 
Declaration is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this 
disaster as beginning on July 13, 2000 and continuing through September 
25, 2000.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is October 29, 2000 and for 
economic injury the deadline is May 30, 2001.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: October 6, 2000.
Allan I. Hoberman,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-27633 Filed 10-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# DEPARTMENT OF

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

18 AAC 50

Air Quality Control

Public Review Draft

May 24 th 

### , 2011Register _

__,

____2011 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

1 The lead in language of 18 AAC 50.030 is amended to read:

18 AAC 50.030. State A ir Q uality P lan. Volumes II and III of the State Air Quality

Control Plan for implementing and enforcing the provisions of AS 46.14 and this chapter, as

amen ded through { adoption date of these regulations } [ February 11 , 201 1 ], are adopted by

reference. The plan includes the following documents which are also adopted by reference:

. . .

18 AAC 50.030(7) is repealed:

(7) r epealed ___/___/_____

. (Eff. 1/18/97, Register 141; am 6/21/98, Register 146; am

9/4/98, Register 147; am 1/1/2000

, Register 152; am 12/30/2000

, Register 156; am 9/21/2001,

Register 159; am 1/27/2002, Register 161; am 3/27/2002, Register 161; am 5/3/2002, Register

162; am 2/20/2004, Register 169; am 6/24/2004, Register 170; am 10/1/2004, Register 171 ; am

12/14/2006, Register 180; am 12/30/2007, Register 184; am 5/17/2008, Register 186; am

7/25/2008, Register 187; am 11/9/2008, Register 188; am 5/6/2009, Register 190; am 11/4/2009,

Register 192 ; am 4/1/2010, Register 193; am 10/29/2010, Register 196; am 4/13/2011, Register

198; am__/__/____, Register ___)

Authority: AS 46.03.020 AS 46.14.030 Sec. 30, ch. 74, SLA 1993

AS 46.14.020 AS 46.14.140
#### Mary L. McIntire BEGLEY, Appellant, v. Johnnie McINTIRE et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 8, 1954.

Earl B. Rose and Buford A. Short, Beat-tyville, for appellant.

C. W. Napier, Sr. and C. W. Napier, Jr., Hazard, for appellee. .

PER CURIAM'.

The judgment sets aside the conveyance of land having a value of less than $2,500 on the alleged grounds of undue influence and mental incapacity. It was rendered December 1, 1951. • Motion for an appeal was filed in this court June 29, 1953. The case is here, therefore, under the terms of KRS 21.080, as amended in 1952. Thomasson v. Commonwealth Life Insurance Co., Ky., 258 S.W.2d 701.

The court is of opinion that the judgment is correct and should be affirmed. Accordingly, the motion for an appeal is overruled. •
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7256

DUANE H. MANNING, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-02-4062-9-25) Submitted: December 18, 2003 Decided: January 15, 2004 Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Duane H. Manning, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Duane H. Manning seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Manning has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
|Exhibit 32


Written
Statement of the Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350


Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Teltronics, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify,
based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ Ewen R. Cameron
Ewen R. CameronChief Executive
Officer
/s/ Russell R. Lee III
Russell R. Lee IIIChief Financial
Officer
Date:   November 12, 2004
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 25, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 63802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27417]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-2332; MM Docket No. 99-313; RM-9753]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Greenwood and Mauldin, SC

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Sutton Radiocasting 
Corporation, reallots Channel 244A from Greenwood to Mauldin, South 
Carolina, as the community's first local aural transmission service, 
and modifies Station WCRS-FM's license accordingly. See 64 FR 61239, 
November 10, 1999. Channel 244A can be reallotted to Mauldin in 
compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation 
requirements with a site restriction of 10.7 kilometers (6.7 miles) 
south to avoid short-spacings to the licensed sites of Station 
WKKT(FM), Channel 245C, Statesville, North Carolina, and Station WNCC-
FM, Channel 244A, Franklin, North Carolina. The coordinates for Channel 
244A at Mauldin are 34-41-30 North Latitude and 82-17-02 West 
Longitude.

DATES: Effective November 27, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 99-313, adopted October 4, 2000, and 
released October 13, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, 
SW, Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under South 
Carolina, is amended by adding Mauldin, Channel 244A; and removing 
Channel 244A at Greenwood.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-27417 Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 36 WEEKS ENDED OCTOBER 6, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-06-1996
<CASH>                                          67,022
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,901
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,544)
<INVENTORY>                                    482,805
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               648,309
<PP&E>                                       1,305,735
<DEPRECIATION>                               (260,821)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,146,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          888,603
<BONDS>                                      2,261,697
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    192,831
<COMMON>                                        57,163
<OTHER-SE>                                   (528,460)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,146,899
<SALES>                                      3,695,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,695,594
<CGS>                                        2,908,631
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,908,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               683,941
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             192,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (89,678)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (89,678)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (89,678)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### BARTON v. STATE.

No. 24852.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 10, 1950.

None on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged in the County Court at Law of Travis County by complaint and information with the offense of unlawfully operating a motor vehicle upon a public street while he was under- the influence of intoxicating liquor. He- plead not guilty to such charge, but was found guilty by a jury and his penalty assessed at a fine of fifty dollars, from which judgment this appeal is perfected.

Neither statement of facts nor bills of exceptions are brought forward in the record. The proceedings appear to be regular, and the judgment is affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130818 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130818 COA: 257077 Wayne CC: 04-001565-01 DANIEL LEE BANNASCH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 7, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit 18.02





CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Donald R. Willoughby, Chief Financial Officer of Getty Copper Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(i)

the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







By:Donald R. WilloughbyName:Donald R. WilloughbyTitle:Chief Financial OfficerDate:July 12, 2007






This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.