alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27547]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Filing

October 20, 2000.
    In the matter of: RT01-39-000, RT01-40-000, RT01-41-000, RT01-
42-000, RT01-43-000, RT01-44-000, RT01-45-000, RT01-46-000, RT01-47-
000, RT01-48-000, RT01-49-000, RT01-50-000, RT01-51-000, (Not 
Consolidated); Concord Electric Company and Exeter & Hampton 
Electric Light Company, Northwestern Public Service, MidAmerican 
Energy Company, Rayburn Country Electric Cooperative, Inc., Central 
Power and Light Company, West Texas Utilities Company, Public 
Service Company of Oklahoma and Southwestern Electric Power Company, 
Arizona Public Service Company, El Paso Electric Company, Public 
Service Company of Colorado, Public Service Company of New Mexico, 
Texas-New Mexico Power Company, Tuscon Electric Power Company and, 
Desert Star, Inc., UtiliCorp United Inc., Consumers Energy Company, 
Lyon Rural Electric Cooperative, United Power, Inc., White River 
Electric Association, Inc., Black Hills Corporation, North Central 
Missouri Electric Cooperative, Inc.

    Take notice that on October 16, 2000, the entities listed in the 
caption above made compliance filings pursuant to 18 CFR 35.34(c) and 
the Commission's Order No. 2000.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Regional Transmission Organizations, Order No. 2000, 65 FR 
809 (January 6, 2000), FERC Stats. & Regs. 31,089 (1999), order on 
reh'g, Order No. 2000-A, 65 FR 12,088 (March 8, 2000), FERC Stats. & 
Regs. 31,092 (2000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filings should 
file a motion to intervene, comments, or protest with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure 918 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such 
motions, comments and protests should be filed on or before November 
20, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine 
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This 
filing may also be viewed on the Internet a http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Beginning November 
1, 2000, comments and protests may be filed electronically via the 
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27547 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Eaton *v.*Robison et al.; Eaton, Recr., Appellee; The Union Joint Stock Land Bank of Detroit, Appellant, et al.

(No. 27962

Decided January 24, 1940.)

*Mr. L. R. Andrews*and *Mr. E. E. Corn,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Johnson, Jones <& Cooper, Mr. A. G. Masters*and *Mr. Ralph G. Martin,*for appellant.

*294It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, 0. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3240 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3240

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 3, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To instruct the Comptroller General of the United States to study the 
            impact of Regulation D, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Regulation D Study Act''.

SEC. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE STUDY.

    (a) Study.--The Comptroller General of the United States shall 
conduct a comprehensive study on the impact on depository institutions, 
consumers, and monetary policy of the requirement that depository 
institutions maintain reserves in accordance with subsections (b) and 
(c) of section 19 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 461) and 
Regulation D (12 CFR 204).
    (b) Matters To Be Studied.--In conducting the study under this 
section, the Comptroller General shall include the following:
            (1) An historic review of how the Board of Governors of the 
        Federal Reserve System has used reserve requirements to conduct 
        United States monetary policy, including information on how and 
        when the Board of Governors has changed the required reserve 
        ratio.
            (2) The impact of the maintenance of reserves on depository 
        institutions, including the operational requirements and 
        associated costs.
            (3) The impact on consumers in managing their accounts, 
        including the costs and benefits of the reserving system.
            (4) Alternatives the Board of Governors may have to the 
        maintenance of reserves to effect monetary policy.
    (c) Consultation.--In conducting the study under this section, the 
Comptroller General shall consult with credit unions and community 
banks.
    (d) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress a report 
containing--
            (1) the results of the study conducted pursuant to this 
        section; and
            (2) any recommendations based on such study.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 2, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 13, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 13, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21D0072. CYNTHIA E. DEAN v. JOHN CAREY DEAN.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 18A07351
EXHIBIT 32.1

                         Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp
                         -------------------------------


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, each hereby
certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of their knowledge:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



                                         By:  /s/  Harold K. Fletcher
                                            --------------------------------
                                                   Harold K. Fletcher
                                                   CEO

                                              /s/  Joseph P. Macaluso
                                              ------------------------------
                                                   Joseph P. Macaluso
                                                   Principal Accounting Officer

                                                   August 14, 2008

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp and will be retained by
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-01-00119-CR

Larry Lee Hodges, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 51,484, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

The appeal is dismissed.

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: April 12, 2001

Do Not Publish
**Exhibit 32(i)**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

                        In connect with the quarterly report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "'Company"') on Form10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2010 to be filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "'Report"'), I, Douglas P. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

                        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.

                        It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934.
| Date: April 13, 2010         | By: | /s/ Douglas P. Taylor      |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                      |     | Douglas P. Taylor,Chief Executive Officer           |
[Cite as State v. Shepherd, 2022-Ohio-2531.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO,

Appellee,

 - vs -

MARLAYON SHEPHERD,

Appellant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

CASE NO. CA2021-11-144

D E C I S I O N

7/25/2022

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case No. CR-2020-02-0270

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Christopher P. Frederick, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by 

appellant, Marlayon Shepherd, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript 

of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and 

upon the amended brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of 

the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court 

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; 
Butler CA2021-11-144

(2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine 

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for 

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both 

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason 

that it is wholly frivolous.

PIPER, P.J., S. POWELL and HENDRICKSON, JJ., concur.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Satterfield & Pontikes Construction, Inc. v. Texas Southern

University, Jim McShan, and Greg Williams

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00 596

- CV

Trial court case number: 2014

- 12277

Trial court: 334th Judicial District Court of Harris County

Appellant has filed a n opposed emergency motion for temporary relief in this

appeal. The Court requests a response to the emergency motion from appellee Texas

Southern University

. The response must be filed no later than 5:00 p.m., 10 days from

the date of this order

. See TEX. R. APP . P. 2, 9.2(c)(4)

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes



Date: August 7, 2014
### Commercial and Industrial Pumps Working Group

DOE Forrestal

1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585

December 18

‐ 19, 2013 Meeting Agenda

Wednesday, December 18, 2013; 10:00 a.m.

– 6:00 p.m. (EST)

Time Presentation/Discussion

10:00

– 10:15 Welcome

DOE Building Amenities, Security, etc.

10:15

– 10:30 Ethics Discussion (DOE General Counsel)

10:30

– 11:15 Introductions by the Working Group Members

11:15

– 11:30 Introduction of Facilitator

Description of Negotiated Rulemakings

11:30

– 11:45 BREAK

11:45

– 12:30 Establishment of Ground Rules for Negotiations

12:30

– 1:30 LUNCH

1:30

– 2:30 Continued Establishment of Ground Rules for Negotiations

2:30

– 4:30 Discussion of Rulemaking Objective and Scope of Negotiations

4:30

– 4:45 BREAK

4:45

– 5:30 Continued Discussion of Rulemaking Objective and Scope of Negotiations

5:30

– 6:00 Development of Schedule for Negotiation Meetings

Thursday, December 19, 2013; 8:00 a.m.

– 3:00 p.m. (EST)

Time Presentation/Discussion

8:00

– 10:30 Continued Discussion of Carry Over from Day 1 (December 18)

10:30

– 10:45 BREAK

10:45

– 12:00 Discussion of the Issues Surrounding Commercial and Industrial Pumps

12:00

– 1:00 Lunch

1:00

– 2:30 Continued Discussion/Negotiated Rulemaking Efforts

2:30

– 3:00 Confirm Meeting Schedule

Establish Needs for Next Meeting
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3192 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to bring the 

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection into the regular appropriations 

process, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2013 

Mr. DUFFY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 

to bring the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

into the regular appropriations process, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bureau of Consumer 

5 Financial Protection Accountability Act of 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3192 IH

1 SEC. 2. BRINGING THE BUREAU INTO THE REGULAR AP2 PROPRIATIONS PROCESS. 

3 Section 1017 of the Consumer Financial Protection 

4 Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5497) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)— 

6 (A) by amending the heading of such sub7 section to read as follows: ‘‘BUDGET, FINAN8 CIAL MANAGEMENT, AND AUDIT.—’’; 

9 (B) by striking paragraphs (1), (2), and 

10 (3); 

11 (C) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and 

12 (5) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively; and 

13 (D) in paragraph (1), as so redesignated— 

14 (i) by striking subparagraph (E); and 

15 (ii) by redesignating subparagraph 

16 (F) as subparagraph (E); 

17 (2) by striking subsections (b) and (c); 

18 (3) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as 

19 subsections (b) and (c), respectively; and 

20 (4) in subsection (c), as so redesignated— 

21 (A) by striking paragraphs (1), (2), and 

22 (3) and inserting the following: 

23 ‘‘(1) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

24 There is authorized to be appropriated such funds as 

25 may be necessary to carry out this title for fiscal 

26 year 2015.’’; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3192 IH

1 (B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as 

2 paragraph (2). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1

LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-53295, 333-85025 and 333-87932) on Form S-8 of BCSB Bankcorp,
Inc. of our report dated November 30, 2006 (except for Notes 20 and 21 which are dated February 14, 2007 and July 3, 2007, respectively) relating to the consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2006 of BCSB Bankcorp, Inc., which appears
in the 2006 Annual Report, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

LOGO

Baltimore, Maryland

July 13, 2007

Suite 100, 405 East Joppa Road Baltimore, Maryland 21286  410-823-8000  1-800-686-3883  Fax: 410-296-4815 
www.stegman.com

LOGO
----

----

|   | (1)    |                                            | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                            |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    |                                            | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|   |   |                                            |                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|   |   |                                            |                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|   |   | /s/ Andrew S. Prince                            |                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|   |   |                                            |                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|   |   | Andrew S. Prince                                |                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer and  |                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|   |   | Chief and Principal Financial Officer      |                                                                                                                                                 |   |

----
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1069 TP 13-01806**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF WILLIE JAMES, PETITIONER,

V ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT.

WILLIE JAMES, PETITIONER PRO SE.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (PETER H. SCHIFF OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County [Thomas G. Leone, A.J.], entered September 27, 2013) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated an inmate rule.
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Entered: November 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7174

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HUMPHREY JONES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-93-452, CA-96-1592-AM) Submitted: August 25, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Humphrey Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Cathleen Ann Tutty, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Bradley Stuart Lui, Senior Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jones , Nos. CR-93-452; CA-96-1592-AM (E.D. Va. July 29, 1997). We deny Jones’ motion for expedited treatment.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of Flagship Global Health,
      Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the
      Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2006
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Fred F. Nazem


Fred
      F.
      Nazem


Chief
      Executive Officer







Date:
      May
      2, 2007