**SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**  **NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart FFFF) (Renewal)** 
**1. Identification of the Information Collection 1(a) Title of the Information**  **Collection** NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (40 CFR P art 63, S ubpart FFFF) (Renewal) , EPA I CR Number 1969.05 , OMB Control Number 2060

- 0533

. **1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract** The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart FFFF ) were proposed on April 4, 2002 and promulgated on November 10, 2003 . These regulations apply to new and existing facilities that manufacture a miscellaneou s organic chemical and that are located at, or are part of, major sources of hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions. New facilities include those that commenced construction or reconstruction after the date of proposal. This information is being collect ed to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart FFFF

. In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by

the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain reco rds of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or an y period during which the monitoring s ys tem is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determini ng compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP

. Any owner/operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following the date of such mea surements, maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority

. In the event that there is no such delegated authority , the reports are sent directl y to the U

. S

. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regiona l office. Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an average of one affected facility at each plant site and that each plant site has only one respondent (i.e., the owner/operator of the plant site). Over the next three ye ars, an average of 2 6 3 respondents per ye ar will be subject to the standard , and two additional respondents per y ear will become subject to the standard. The active (previous) IC R had the following Terms of Clearance (TOC):
When this I CR is renewed, EPA should review the respondent burden, universe, labor rates, and capital costs and ensure these estimates have2 been updated. EPA has addressed each item of concern in the TOC by consulting with industry

. All estimates have been thoroughl y checked and updated where information is available. All of the miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing facilities in the United States are owned and operated by the organic chemical industry (the “Affected Public”) . None of the facilities in the United States are owned b y state, local, tribal , or the Federal government. They are all privatel y - owned , for

- profit businesses. The burden to the “Affected Public” may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

**–** NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart FFFF ) (Renewal). The “Federal Government” burden is attributed entirely to work performed by other federal employ ees or government contractors and may be fo und below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart FFFF ) (Renewal).
**2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection**  The EPA is charge d under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory

of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants. These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous air pollutants and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction. In addition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any

owner/operator subject to any requirement of this Act to: (A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports;

(C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonabl y require. In the Administrator's judgment, HAP emissions from miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing cause or contribute to air pollution that may reas onably

be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, the NESHAP were promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR part 63 , subpart FFFF

.3

**2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data** The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard ensure compliance with the applicable regulations which where promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act. The collected information is also used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings. Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility ’ s initial capability to comply

with the emission standard. Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the standard at all times. During the performance test a record of the operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission monitor. The notifications required in the standard are used to inform the A gency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations. The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated, leaks are being detected and repaired , and the standard are being met. The performance test may also be observed. The required semiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess emissions, identify problems at the facility , verify operation/maintenance procedures and for compliance determinations.
**3. Non**
**- duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria**  The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR part 63, subpart FFFF

. **3(a) Non**
**- duplication**  If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directl y to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directl y to the delegated state or local agency . If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a cop y of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, duplication does not exist. **3(b) Pub lic Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB**  An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this I CR was published in the Federal Register ( 77 FR 47631 ) on August 9, 2012 . No comments were received on the burden published in the Fede ral Register

. **3(c) Consultations**
T he Agency ’s industry

experts have been consulted, and the Agency ’s internal data4

sources and projections of industry growth over the next three y ears have been considered. The primary source of information as reported b y industry , in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in the standard, is the Online Tracking Information System (OTI S) which is operated and maintained by the EPA Office of Compliance. OT IS is the EPA database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of all compliance data. The growth rate for the industry is based on our consultations with the Agen cy ’s internal industry experts. Industry trade associations and other interested parties were provided an opportunity to comment on the burden associated with the standard as it was being developed. In developing this I CR, we contacted : 1) the National Association of Chemical Distributors (NACD) , at ( 703 ) 527

- 6223 ; and 2) the American Chemistry Council , at ( 703 ) 741

- 5165

. It is our policy

to respond after a thorough review of comments received since the last ICR renewal as well as those submitted in response to the first Federal Register notice. In this case, no comments were receiv ed. **3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection** Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful technique s to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. I f the information required by these standards was collected less frequently , the proper operation and maintenance of control equipment and the p ossibility

of detecting violations would be less likely

. **3(e) General Guidelines**
T hese reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated by OMB under 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5. These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and notifications for at least five years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards. EPA believes that the five

- ye ar records retention requirement is consistent the Part 70 permit program and the five

- ye ar statute of limitations on which the permit program is based. Th e retention of records for five ye ars allows EPA to establish the compliance history of a source, an y pattern of non

- compliance and to determine the ap propriate level of enforcement action. EPA has found that the most flagrant violators have violations extending bey ond five ye ars. In addition, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the violators due to the destruction or nonexistence of essential records

. **3(f) Confidentiality** Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B

- Confidentiality of Business Informatio n (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902,5

September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979). **3(g) Sensitive Questions**
T he reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive questions. **4. The Respondents and the Information Requested 4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes**  The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturers . The United States Standard Indu strial Classification (SI C ) code s for the respondents affected b y the standards and the c orrespond ing North American Industry Classification Sy stem (NAICS ) codes for miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturers are listed in the table below

.
**Standard (**  **40 CFR P**  **art 63, S**  **ubpart FFFF )**  **SIC Codes NAICS Codes**  Resin, Sy nthetic Rubber, and Artificial S ynthetic Fibers and Filaments Manufacturing 2821, 2822, 2823, 2824 3252 Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing 2833, 283, 2835, 2836 3254 Soap, Cleaning Compound, and Toilet Preparation Manufacturing 28,41, 2842, 2843, 2844 3256 Paint, Coating, and Adhesive Manufacturing 2851, 2891 3255 Basic Chemical Manufacturing (Does not include 325131

- Inorganic Dy e and Pigment Manufacturing or 325181

- Alkalis and Chlorine Manufacturing) 2861, 2865, 2869 3251
Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing 2873, 2874, 2875, 2879 3253 Other Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing 2892, 2893 3259
**4(b) Information Requested (i)**  **Data Items**
In this ICR , all the data that is recorded or reported is required by the NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (40 CFR P art 63, S ubpart FFFF).6

A source must make the following reports:

**Notification s**  Initial notification 63.5, 63.9(b), 63.2515(a)

- (c) Initial performance test , test plan, and emission profile 63.7(b)

- (c), 63.9(e), 63.2515(a), (d) Notification of CMS performance evaluation 63.8(e)(2), 63.9(g) Notification of compliance status (including performance test results) 63.9(h), 63.10(d)(2), 63.2515(e) Notification of process change 63.2515(f) Emissions averaging plan 63.2500(c) Pre

- compliance report 63.2520(c) Semiannual compliance report 63.10(e)(3), 63.2520(b), (d) A source must keep the following records:
**Recordkeeping** Record retention 63.10(b)(1), 62.2530 Documentation supporting initial notification and notification of compliance status 63.10(b)(2)(xiv) and 63.2525(a(1) Startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan 63.6(e)(3) Record related to startup, shutdown, and malfunction 63.6(e)(3)(iii)

- (iv), 63.2525(a)(2) Records of performance tests and CMS performance evaluations 63.10(b)(2)(viii), 63.2525(a)(3) Records for equipment leaks 63.1038(b

- (c), 63.2525(a)(4) Daily schedule or log of each o perating scenario 63.2525(a)(5) Records for batch processes complying with process based emission limitations 63.2525(a)(6)

- (7) Planned routine maintenance records for storage tank control devices 63.2525(a)(8) Maintenance wastewater plan 63.2525(a)(9) Records for safet y device openings 63.2525(a)(10)7 **Recordkeeping** Results of each CMS calibration, validation check, and inspection 63.2475(c)(6)

- (8), (d)(4)

- (5), (e(4)

- (7), (f)(3)

- (4), 63.2525(a)(11) Records for emissions averaging 63.2500(d) Records for each CMS 63.8(d)(3), 63.8(f)(6)(i), 63.10(b)(2)(vi)

- (xi), 63.2525(b) Electronic Reporting Some of the r espondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data , internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping at a plant site. Also, regulatory

agencies in cooperation with the respondents continue to create reporting sy stems to transmit data electronically

. However, electronic reporting s ys tems are still not widely used. At this time, it is estimated that approximately 2 0 percent of the respon dents use electronic reporting.

**(ii) Respondent Activities**

**Respondent Activities** Read instructions. Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate CMS for opacity , or for pressure drop and liquid supply pressure for control device. Perform initial performance test and repeat performance tests if necessary

. Write the notifications and reports listed above. Enter information required to be recorded above. Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and sy stems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information.8 **Respondent Activities** Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of disclosing and providing information. Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information. Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information. Currently , sources are using monitoring and reporting equipment that provide parameter data in an automated way e.g., continuous parameter monitoring s ys tem. Although personnel at the source still need to evaluate the data, this type of monitoring equipment has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping. **5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management**  **5(a) Agency Activities** EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analysis, storage, and distribution of the required information.
**Agency Activities** Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry

. Audit facility

records. Input, anal yz e, and maintain data in the Online Tracking Information Sy stem (OTI S). **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management** Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are p roperl y installed and operated. Performance test reports are used b y the Agency to discern a source ’ s initial capability to compl y with the emission standard. Data and records maintained by the respon dents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.
In formation contained in the reports is entered into OTI S which is operated and maintained by

EPA's Office of Compliance. OT IS is EPA ’ s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government

- owned facilities. EP A uses the OTI S for tracking air pollution compliance and9

enforcement b y local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data. The records required b y this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator for five ye ars. **5(c ) Small**  **Entity Flexibility** A majority

of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large businesses). However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the regulation. Due to technical considerations involving the process operations and the ty pes of control equipment employed, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and large entities. The Agency considers these to be the minimum requirements needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small entities. To the extent that larger businesses can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be reduced. **5(d ) Collection**  **Schedule** The specific frequency

for each information collection activity within this request is shown in below Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

**–** NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart FFFF ) (Renewal)

. **6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection** Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this I CR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Where ver appropriate, specific tasks and major assump tions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory

. The Agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it display s a currently valid OMB Control Number.
**6 (a**  **) Estimating Respondent Burden**  The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirement s is estimated to be 426,474 hours (Total Labor Hours from Table 1 below )

. T hese hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previously

approved ICR, and any

comments received.10

**6(b ) Estimating**  **Respondent Costs (i) Estimating Labor Costs**  This I CR uses the following labor rates: Managerial $ 121.44 ($ 57.83 + 110%) Technical $ 100.23 ($ 47.73 + 110%) Clerical $ 50.51 ($ 24.05 + 110%) These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2012 , “ Table 2 . Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group. ” The rates are from column 1, “ Total compensation. ” The rates have been increased b y 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employ ed by private industry

. **(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs**  The ty pe of industry

costs associated with the information collection activities in the subject standard are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs associated with continuous monitoring. The capital/startup costs are onetime costs when a facility becomes subject to the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor and other costs such as photocopying and postage.

**(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs** This I CR assumes capital costs are incurred as one

- time costs for new facilities. The capital costs associated with monitoring equipment include the monitoring equipment, installation, ancillary

costs (planning and selection), and a data acquisition sy stem (DAS) (data logger, computer, logging and reporting software, and printer). The capital costs for the monitoring equipment were estimated based on the following as sumptions: (1) the monitoring equipment cost per process vent is $12,150, which includes the cost for thermocouple, wire, and DAS; (2) the monitoring equipment cost for each facility with wastewater sy stems is $20,100, which includes the cost for steam flo w meter, liquid flow meter, thermocouple, wire, and DAS; (3) the monitoring equipment cost for each storage tank with separate emission controls is $780, which includes the cost for thermocouple and wire to connect to the DAS for process vents; and (4) two new facilities will purchase this equipment for process vents, wastewater s ys tems, and storage tanks in each of the three ye ars covered b y this I CR. The monitoring equipment costs were applied to the impacted process vents, wastewater s ys tems, and storag e tanks to determine an average capital cost per facility for monitoring equipment. In this way , the average capital cost per facility

was estimated to be $17,174. The capital costs associated with file cabinets for storing collected data and reports inc lude the purchase of one standard four

- drawer file cabinet for each facility

(assume $235 per file cabinet). Operation and maintenance costs associated with materials and supplies were estimated11

at $500. The O&M cost associated with the monitoring equipment is $15,875 for process vents, $20,510 for wastewater systems, and $5,825 for storage tanks. The O&M costs were applied to the impacted process vents, wastewater sy stems, and storage tanks to determine an average O&M cost of $21,209 per facilit y for monitoring equipment. O&M costs associated with the paperwork requirement such as photocop yi ng and postage are estimated to be approximately $46 per facility

.

**Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs** (A) Continuous Monitoring Device (B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent (C)

Number of New Respondents (D)

Total Capital/Startup Cost, (B X C) (E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent (F)

Number of Respondents with O&M (G)

Total O&M, (E X F) Monitoring equipment $17,174 2 $34,348 NA NA $0 File cabinet $235 2 $470 NA NA $0 Material, supply, and equipment maintenance NA NA $0 $21,209 263 $5,577,967 Photocopying and postage NA NA $0 $46 263 $12,098 **Total** $17,409 2 $34,818 $21,255 263 $5,590,065 The total capital/startup costs for this I CR are $34,818. This is the total o f column D in the above table. The total operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for this I CR are $5,5 90 , 065

. This is the total of column G. The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the IC R is estimated to be $ 5,6 24 , 883

. These are recordkeeping costs. **6(c ) Estimating**  **Agency Burden and Cost** The only costs to the Agency

are those costs asso ciated with anal ys is of the reported information. EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program includes activities such as the examination of records maintained by the respondents , periodic inspection of sources of emissions, and the publication and d istribution of collected information. The average annual Agency cost during the three y ears of the ICR is estimated to be $ 381,097

. This cost is based on the average hourl y labor rate as follows:12 Managerial $ 6 2.27 (GS

- 13, Step 5, $ 3 8. 92 + 60% ) Technical $ 4 6

. 21 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $ 28. 88 + 60% ) Clerical $2 5.01 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $ 15. 63 + 60% ) These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) , 20 1 2 General Schedule , which excludes locality , rates of pay

. The rates have been increased b y 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees
. Details upon which this estimate is based appear below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63 , Subpart FFFF ) (Renewal). **6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs** Based on our research for this I CR, on average over the next three ye ars, approximately 261 existing respondents will be subject to the standard s in the initial year of the three

- year period . It is estimated that an additio nal two respondents per ye ar will become subject. The overall average number of respondents, as shown in the table below , is 263 per year. The number of respondents is calculated us ing the following table that addresses the three ye ars covered b y this ICR.
**Number of Respondents**

Year (A) Number of Ne w Respondents 1 (B)

Number of Existing Respondents (C)

Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports (D) Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents (E)

Number of Respondents (E=A+B+C

- D)

1 2 259 0 0 261
2 2 261 0 0 263
3 2 263 0 0 265 Average 2 261 0 0 263 1 New respondent include sources with constructed, reconstructed and modified affected facilities.

. C olumn D is subtracted to avoid double

- counting respondents

. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three ye ar period of this ICR is 263

. The total number of annual responses per ye ar is calculated using the following table:13 **Total Annual Responses** (A) Information Collection Activity (B) Number of Respondents (C)

Number of Responses (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports (E) Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D

Read rule and instructions 2 1 0 2 Required activities Initial performance test process vents 2 1 0 2 Initial performance test wa stewater 2 1 0 2 Initial CMS performance evaluation 0 1 0 0 Repeat performance test 2 1 0 2 Create information See 3E Gather existing information See 3E Write reports Notification of construction/reconstruction 2 1 0 2 Notification of actual startup 2 1 0 2 Initial notification 2 1 0 2 Emission Averaging plan 0 1 0 0 Pre

- com pliance report 1 1 0 1 Notification of performance test 2 1 0 2 Notification of initial CMS performance evaluation 0 1 0 0 Notification of compliance status a. With performance test 2 1 0 2 b. Without performance test 0 1 0 0 Notification of physical/operational change 26 1 0 26 Semiannual summary reports a. No deviations 23 7 2 0 474 b. Deviations 26 2 0 52 c. SS&M report 263 2 0 526 d. Leak detention and repair (LDAR) report 263 2 0 526 e. Emission averaging report 26 2 0 52 **Total 1,675** 14

The number of Total Annual Responses is 1,675. The total annual labor costs are $41,294,926

. Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

**–** NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart FFFF ) (Renewal)

. **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables** The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2 , respectivel y, and summarized below. **(i) Respondent Tally** The total annual labor hours are 426,474 hours at a cost of $41,294,926

. Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

**–** NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart FFFF ) (Renewal)

. Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 255 hours per response

. The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity are $5,6 24 , 883

. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.

**(ii) The Agency Tally** The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three y ears is estimated to be 8,457 labor hours at a cost of $381,097 . See below Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart FFFF ) (Renewal)

. **6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden** There is an increase in burden hours and costs for both the re spondents and the Agency

. Th is increase in burden from the most

- recently approved ICR is due to adjustments in labor rates and an increase in the estimated number of respondents subject to the regulations

. This I CR uses updated labor rates from the Burea u of Labor Statistics to calculate all burden costs. Additionally , this I CR assumes the respondent universe has increased by six sources (growth rate of two sources per ye ar) since the last renewal. The growth in the number of respondents also results in a corresponding increase in the total O&M costs. However, there is a decrease in the total capital/startup costs from the most recentl y approved ICR. The previous I CR calculated annualized capital costs over 15 y ears, using an interest rate of 7 percent, and assumed the costs were incurred b y both new and existing sources.15

This I CR assumes capital costs are one

- time costs for new respondents onl y. This assumption results in a decrease in the total capital costs because only new sources are subject to these costs. **6(g) Burden Statement** The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 255 hours per response. Burden means the total ti me, effort, or financial resources expended b y persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology an d s ys tems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing way s to compl y with any previously

applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it display s a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. To comment on the Agency 's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this I CR under Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 2012

- 0519

. An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov/ which may be used to obtain a copy

of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to ac cess those documents in the public docket that are available electronically

. When in the sy stem , select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified in this document. The documents are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334 , 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a. m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the docket center i s (202) 566

- 17 52

. Also, you can send comments to the Office of In formation and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 2012

- 0519 and OMB Control Number 2060

- 0533 in any correspondence.
**Part B of the Supporting Statement**  This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.16

**Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost** 

**– NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (40 CFR Part**  **63, Subpart FFFF) (Renewal)**

**Burden Item (A)**  **Person hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person hours per**  **respondent per**  **year (C=AxB)**  **(D)**

**Respondents per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Management person hours**  **per year (Ex0.05)**  **(G)**

**Clerical person**  **hours per year**  **(Ex0.1) (H)** 

**Total Cost per year, $**  **b**

1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and studies N/A 3. Reporting requirements a. Read rule and instructions c 1 1 1 2 2 0.1 0.2 $222.71 b. Required activities i. Initial performance test

– process vents 480 1 480 2 960 48 96 $106,898.88 ii. Initial performance test

– wastewater 160 1 160 2 320 16 32 $35,632.96 iii. Initial CMS performance evaluation d 10 1 10 0 0 0 0 $0 iv. Repeat performance test 20 1 20 2 40 2 4 $4,454.12 c. Create information See 3E d. Gather existing information See 3E e. Write report i. Notification of constructio/reconstruction 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 $445.41 ii. Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 $445.41 iii. Initial notification 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 $445.41 iv. Emissions averaging plan e 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0 v. Pre

- compliance report f 40 1 40 1 40 2 4 $4,454.12 vi. Performance test notification g 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 $445.41 vii. Notification of initial CMS performance evaluation 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 viii. Notification of compliance status a. With performance test g 80 1 80 2 160 8 16 $17,816.4817

**Burden Item (A)**  **Person hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person hours per**  **respondent per**  **year (C=AxB)**  **(D)**

**Respondents per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Management person hours**  **per year (Ex0.05)**  **(G)**

**Clerical person**  **hours per year**  **(Ex0.1) (H)** 

**Total Cost per year, $**  **b**

b. Without performance test h 120 1 120 0 0 0 0 $0 ix. Notification of physical/ operational change i 8 1 8 26 .3 210 .4 10.52 21 .04 $23,428.67 x. Semiannual summary report a. No deviations j 8 2 16 236.7 3,787 .2 189.36 378.72 $421,716.08 b. Deviations j 24 2 48 26 .3 1,262 .4 63.12 126.24 $140,572.03 c. SS&M report k 8 2 16 263 4,208 210.4 420.8 $468,573.42 d. LDAR report l 404 2 808 263 212,504 10,625.2 21,250.4 $23,662,957.91 e. Emission averaging report m 20 2 40 26 .1 1,044 52.2 104.4 $116,252.53 **Subtotal for Reporting Requirements 258,237**  **$25,004,761.56** 4 Recordkeeping requirements a. Read rules and instructions See 3E b. Plan activities N/A c. Implement activities N/A d. Develop record system n 40 1 40 2 80 4 8 $8,908.24 e. Develop SS&M plan o 100 1 100 2 200 10 20 $22,270.60 f. Develop QA/QC plan for CMS p 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0 g. Time to train personnel q 40 1 40 2 80 4 8 $8,908.24 h. Time to retrain/refresh personnel r 16 1 16 261 4,176 208.8 417.6 $465,010.13 i. Time to enter information i. Records of SS&M 1.5 52 78 263 20,514 1,025.7 2,051.4 $2,284,295.44 ii. Records of CMS data s

a. Record of continuously monitored parameters 1 365 365 263 95,995 4,799.75 9,599.5 $10,689,331.2418

**Burden Item (A)**  **Person hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person hours per**  **respondent per**  **year (C=AxB)**  **(D)**

**Respondents per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Management person hours**  **per year (Ex0.05)**  **(G)**

**Clerical person**  **hours per year**  **(Ex0.1) (H)** 

**Total Cost per year, $**  **b**

b. Compile data 24 2 48 263 12,624 631.2 1,262.4 $1,405,720.27 c. Enter/verify information for semiannual report 16 2 32 263 8,416 420.8 841.6 $937,146.85 j. Calibration of CMS t 16 1 16 263 4,208 210.4 420.8 $468,573.42 **Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements 168,237**  **$16,290,164.43 TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST**  **(rounded) 426,474**  **$41,294,92 6** 

**Assu mptions:**  a We have assumed that there are 261 existing facilities subject to the rule, and that two new major sources per year will become subject. Therefore, the average number of respondents that are subject to this rule is 263. b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $121.44 per hour for Executive, Administrativ e, and Managerial labor; $100.23 per hour for Technical labor, and $50.51 per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2 012, Table 2. Civilian Workers, by Occupational and Industry group. The rates are from column 1, Total Compensation. The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account fo r the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.
c This will occur only in the first year after a facility becom es subject to the rule. d Person

- hours per occurrence are based on the performance specification costs to certify CMS ($500) divided by the composite hourly l abor rate. No performance evaluations are required for the parameter monitoring systems i ncluded in the rule. Assumes no facilities will use the alternative standard, w hich required CEMS and performance evaluations. e We have assumed that 10 percent of existing facilities will comply with emissions averaging requirements; new facilities are not allowed to use emissions averaging. f Assumed 50 percent of new facilities will submit a pre

- com pliance report (2 x 50% = 1 Facility). g We have assumed that 90 percent of facilities will comply by conducting a performance test(s). The notification of compliance status includes the report of the performance test(s) (2 x 90% = 2 Facilities)

. h We have assumed that 10 percent of facilities will comply by submitting engineering calculations, design calculations, etc. with no performance tests. The not ification of compliance status includes those calculations. i We have assumed that 10 percent of facilities will implement process changes (263 x 10% = 26 .3 Facilities). j We have assumed that 90 percent of facilities will have no deviations (263 x 90% = 23 6.7 Facilities), only 10 percent will have deviations (263 x 10% = 26 .3 Facilities). k We assume that all facilities will report actions taken during startup, shutdown, or malfunction that are consistent with the SS&M plan. l According to EPA guidanc e, annual recordkeeping and reporting costs for LDAR programs are estimated to be 40 percent of monitoring and repair labor, which19

averages $51,681 per facility, or $20,672 per facility (40*51,681=20,672) person hours per occurrence are based on this cost divided by the composite hourly labor rate.
m We have assumed that 10 percent of existing facilities (261 x 10% = 26 .1 Facilities) will comply with emissions averaging requirements; new facilities are not allowed to use emissions averaging.
n We have as sumed that it will take 40 hours for each respondent to develop a record system for recording parameter monitoring informatio n. o We have assumed that it will take 80 hours for each respondent to draft the startup, shutdow n, and malfunction plan and another 20 hours of review/revisions, for a total of 100 hours. p We have assumed that it will take 40 hours to develop and review the QA/QC plan for the CMS. No QA/QC plan is required for the parameter monitoring systems included in the rule. We have assum ed that no facility will use the alternative standard, w hich requires CEMS and QA/QC plans. q We have assumed that it will take 40 hours to train personnel.
r We have assumed it will take 20 days (16 hours) to provide refresher training for personnel.
s The record of continuously monitored parameters includes: process vent, storage tank, and w astewater monitoring and inspectio ns. t We have assumed that calibration of CMS will require 8 hours per year for each monitor. We are assuming a total of 2 CMS f or each facility, for a total requirement of 16 hours per year per facility.20

**Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost**

**– NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (40 CFR Part**  **63, Subpart FFFF) (Renewal)**

**Activity (A)**  **EPA person**  **hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per plant per year**  **(C)**

**EPA person**  **hours per respondent**  **per year (C=AxB)**  **(D)**

**Plants per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Managem ent**  **person hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical person**  **hours per ye**  **ar (Ex0.1)**  **(H)**

**Total Cost per year, $**  **b**

1. Review notification of construction/reconstruction 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 $207.30 2. Review notification of actual startup 1 1 1 2 2 0.1 0.2 $103.65 3. Review initial notification 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 $207.30 4. Review emissions averaging plan c 20 1 20 0 0 0 0 $0 5. Review pre

- com

pliance report d 4 1 4 1 4 0.2 0.4 $207.30 6. Review notification of initial performance test 2 1 2 2 4 0.2 0.4 $207.30 7. Review notification of initial CMS demonstration 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 8. Review notification of compliance status report i. With performance test e 40 1 40 2 80 4 8 $4,145.96 ii. Without performance test f 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0 9. Review notification physical/operational change g 8 1 8 26 .3 210 .4 10.52 21.04 $10,903.87 10. Review

semiannual summary report i. No deviations h 2 2 4 23 6.7 94 6.8 47.34 94.68 $49,067.44 ii. Deviations h 8 2 16 26 .3 420.8 21.04 42.08 $21,807.75 iii. SS&M report i 2 2 4 263 1,052 52.60 105.20 $54,519.37 iv. LDAR report j 8 2 16 263 4,208 210.40 420.80 $218,077.50 v. Emission averaging report c 8 2 16 26 .1 417.6 20.88 41.76 $21,641.91 **TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)**  **8,45 7**  **$381,09 7** 

**Assu mptions:**  a We have assumed that the re are 261 existing facilities subject to the rule, and that two new major sources per year will become subject. Therefore, the average number of respondents that are subject to this rule is 26 3

.21

b This cost is based on the fo llowing labor rates w hich incorporates a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead expenses: $ 62.27 Managerial rate (GS

- 13, Step 5, $ 38.92 x 1.6), $ 46.21 Technical rate (GS

- 12, Step 1, $ 28.88 x 1.6), and $ 25.01 Clerical rate (GS

- 6, Step 3, $ 15.63 x 1.6). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “20 1 2 General Schedule” which excludes locality rates of pay. c We have assumed that 10 percent of existing facilities will comply with emissions averaging requireme nts (261 x 10% = 26 Facilities)

. d We have assumed that 50 percent of new facilities will submit a pre

- com pliance report (2 x 50% = 1 Facility)

. e We have assumed that 90 percent of facilities will comply by conducting a performance test(s). The notification of complianc e status includes the report of the performance test(s) (2 x 90% = 2 Facilities)

. f We have assumed that 10 percent of facilitie s will comply by submitting engineering calculations, design calculation, etc., with no performance tests. The notification of compliance status includes those calculations. g We have assumed that 10 percent of facilities will implement process changes ( 263 x 10% = 26 .3 Facilities)

. h We have assumed that 90 percent of facilities will have no deviations (263 x 90% = 23 6.7 Facilities) , 10 percent will have deviations (263 x 10% = 26 Facilities)

. i We have assumed that all facilities will report actions t aken during startup, shutdown, or malfunction that are consistent with the SS&M plan. j We have assumed that all facilities will report the specified information for processes subject to the equipment leak standar ds.