alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.6

                          CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT


CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT executed this 1st day of MAY, 2005, by and between
LEVIN INDUSTRIES LTD. ("LEVIN"), a British Columbia Corporation, with offices at
315 E. 2nd Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and SIMON LEVIN.
("SIMON"), a Vancouver Businessman, (collectively the "Parties").

WHEREAS, LEVIN wishes to enter into a consulting services agreement with SIMON.


IT IS THEREFORE NOW AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

      1.    Effective May 1, 2005, Simon shall be hired as a consultant to LEVIN
            for the purpose of assisting LEVIN in establishing accounts with
            potential clients and negotiate new contracts.

      2.    The initial term of this agreement is for TWELVE (12) months and may
            be extended upon mutual agreement of the parties hereto.

      3.    As compensation and in consideration for the SIMON services, LEVIN
            shall remunerate SIMON, $5000.00 per month. This agreement may be
            terminated in writing by either party with thirty (30) days notice.

      4.    SIMON shall not be required to devote his entire time and attention
            to LEVIN business, but shall devote such time as is necessary to
            properly carry out the duties for which he is being contracted.

      5.    SIMON shall be entitled to a business expense account allowance, to
            cover all travel, entertainment and business expenses, which he
            incurs on behalf of LEVIN. SIMON shall maintain records to
            substantiate this account allowance and provide a monthly expense
            report.

      6.    This Agreement shall be construed to the laws of British Columbia,
            Canada.

      7.    This Agreement supersedes all prior or contemporaneous oral or
            written statements concerning the subject matter herein, and
            represents the complete and final understanding between the parties
            hereto. Any modification of this Agreement is ineffective unless
            provided in writing and executed by all of the parties hereto.

      8.    SIMON acknowledges that he may not assign his rights or delegate his
            duties or obligations under this agreement.


<PAGE>

      9.    If a suit or action is instituted in connection with any controversy
            arising out of this agreement, the prevailing party shall be
            entitled to recover from the other party, in addition to costs, such
            sums as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorneys fees,
            including fees on appeal from a judgment, order or decree.

      10.   This agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of
            which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall
            constitute one and the same instrument.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year
first written above.




/s/ SIMON LEVIN
--------------------

SIMON LEVIN

This 1st day of May, 2005.



/s/ SIMON LEVIN
--------------------

LEVIN INDUSTRIES LTD.
Director: Simon Levin
This 1st day of May, 2005.
CITICORP MORTGAGE, INC.
FINANCIAL CONTROL

12855 N. OUTER FORTY DRIVE
MS 822
ST. LOUIS, MO 63141


     As of and for the year ended December 31, 1997, Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. (an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citicorp) and subsidiaries (the Company) has
complied,  in all material  respects  with the minimum  servicing  standards set
forth  in  the  Mortgage  Bankers   Association  of  America's   UNIFORM  SINGLE
ATTESTATION FOR MORTGAGE  BANKERS.  As of and for this same period,  the Company
had in effect  fidelity bond and errors and omissions  policies in the amount of
$274 million.

Very truly yours,




CITICORP MORTGAGE, INC.


By:  /s/  David B. Lowman
          David B. Lowman, Managing Director-
          Mortgage Services

By  /s/  Jim B. Levites           3-4-98
         Jim B. Levites, Managing Director-
         Default Management

By  /s/  Richard G. Thornberry     3-9-98
         Richard G. Thornberry President/Chief Operating Officer

By /s/  Carl Levinson
        Carl L. Levinson, Chairman/Chief Executive Officer


February 20, 1998
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multi Media Tutorial Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Barry Reichman, Chief Executive Officer and CFO of the Company, certify, to my
best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Barry Reichman
    -------------------------
    Barry Reichman
    President, CFO and CEO


Dated:  July 15, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27449]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Public Notice for Waiver of Aeronautical Land-Use Assurance Carl 
R. Keller Field Airport, Port Clinton, OH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent of waiver with respect to land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is considering a proposal to change a portion of the 
airport (a parcel of land in the Northeast Quarter of section 2, T6N, 
R17E, Portage Township, Ottawa County, Ohio, current use and present 
condition is vacant grassland) from aeronautical use to non-
aeronautical. There is no impacts to the airport by allowing the 
airport to lease the property. The land was acquired under FAA Project 
Number 3-39-0068-1599. In accordance with section 47107(h) of Title 49, 
United States Code, this notice is required to be published in the 
Federal Register 30 days before modifying the land-use assurance that 
requires the property to be used for an aeronautical purpose. The 
proposed land will be leased and a visitors' bureau will be built. The 
visitors' bureau will be a marketing tool and increase airport 
recognition. The lease payments that the visitors' bureau will make to 
the Erie Ottawa Airport Authority will increase income for airport 
improvements and operation expenses at Carl R. Keller Field Airport. 
The additional benefit of leasing this land is that the visitors' 
bureau will be installing the first portion of the access road for this 
area of the airport property.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 27, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Arlene B. Draper, Acting Assistant 
Manager, Detroit Airports District Office, Willow Run Airport East, 
8820 Beck Road, Belleville, MI, 48111. Telephone number 734-487-7282/
FAX number 734-487-7299. Documents reflecting this FAA action may be 
reviewed at this same location on at Carl R. Keller Field Airport, Port 
Clinton, Ohio.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces that the FAA intends 
to authorize the lease of the subject airport property at Carl R. 
Keller Field, Port Clinton, Ohio. Approval does not constitute a 
commitment by the FAA to financially assist in the lease of the subject 
airport property nor a determination that all measures covered by the 
programs are eligible for Airport Improvement Program funding from the 
FAA. The disposition of proceeds from the lease of the airport property 
will be in accordance FAA's Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use of 
Airport Revenue, published in the Federal Register on February 16, 
1999.

James M. Opatrny,
Acting Manager, Detroit Airports District Office FAA, Great Lakes 
Region.
[FR Doc. 00-27449 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 22855.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 10, 1944.

Robert E. Moss, of La Grange, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty,, of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Upon his plea of guilty, appellant was assessed the penalty of death, for the murder of his wife.

The killing, as shown by the testimony of- eye-witnesses, and by appellant’s written confession, was wilful, wanton, and without justification or excuse. It was *443the jury’s province to assess the penalty.

No bills of exception were reserved.

All matters of procedure appear regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        7
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  10,684
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                      0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                        0
<EQUITIES>                                37
<MORTGAGE>                                65
<REAL-ESTATE>                              0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                        11,542
<CASH>                                 1,124
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                         0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                   322
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        14,759
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                        0
<POLICY-OTHER>                        11,688
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                      0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                          229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                               14
<COMMON>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                             1,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          14,759
<PREMIUMS>                                 0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      208
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                        13
<OTHER-INCOME>                            89
<BENEFITS>                                 0
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>               16
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                      76
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           52
<INCOME-TAX>                              17
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                              35
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                           1.14
<RESERVE-OPEN>                             0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                        0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                          0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                         0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                           0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                            0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                    0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2758]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals 
and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or 
commercial property such as patentable material, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: February 23, 2000.
    Time: 3 pm to 5 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Residence Inn, Conference Room, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Elsie D. Taylor, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Extramural Project Review Branch, National Institute 
on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 
Suite 409, 6000 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-7003, 301-443-
9787, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f79283968e9b9885b7999e969696d9999e9fd9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="630617021a0f0c11230d0a0202024d0d0a0b4d040c15">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 1, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-2758 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### MADDOX v. LEE.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 27, 1953.

William G. Reed, Carrollton, for appellant.

John M. Berry and D. K. Floyd, New Castle, W. Loraine Mix, Louisville, for appellee.

COMBS, Justice.

The plaintiff, H. S. Maddox, by petition filed in the Owen Circuit Court sought judgment against the appellee, Marty B. Lee, for various sums allegedly expended 'by him for appellee’s use and benefit during the time he operated a farm owned by the appellee. It was alleged in the petition that the appellee promised to pay plaintiff’s debt from the proceeds derived from the sale of the fárm. The holder of a mortgage on the farm and the man to whom the farm was subsequently sold were joined as parties defendant. The prayer of the petition was for a judgment against the appel-lee; for a general order of attachment against appellee’s property; and that the purchaser of the farm be required to answer as a garnishee defendant..

We find nothing in the record .showing service of process on. any of the parties, but it is stated in the briefs the mortgage holder was summoned in Owen County, the purchaser of the farm in Gallatin County and the appellee was not summoned at all.

The appellee by special appearance moved the court to dismiss the action as to her, on the-ground she is a nonresident of Owen Coünty’and was not served with summons in that county. The motion was sustained. Hence, this appeal.

Plaintiff’s cause- of action is no more nor less than a transitory action on an unsecured debt, the venue of which is governed by section 78 of the Civil Code of Practice. That section provides such an action may be brought “in any county in which the defendant, .or in which one of several defendants, who -may ■ be properly joined' as such in the action, resides or is summoned.”

There is no contention the appellee either resided or was summoned in Owen County. The only question which merits discussion is whether the joinder of the mortgage holder as a defendant, and service of- summons upon him in Owen County, gave the court jurisdiction over appellee. The answer must, be in the negative. Although plaintiff makes some claim to an equitable lien on the farm, the allegations of his petition do not establish such a lien. Therefore the mortgage holder was not a proper party defendant. Since appellee had no lien on the farm, the existence of a lien in the hands of a third person was of no consequence to him. It should be noted in passing that there is nothing in the record *602to show any order of attachment was issued or levied upon any of appellee’s property:

We find no substance in the argument the question of jurisdiction was not properly raised. The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from Stone Container
Corporation and Subsidiaries' June 30, 1997 Consolidated Balance Sheet and
Consolidated Operations and Retained Earnings and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             179
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      600
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                        690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1574
<PP&E>                                            4848
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2383
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              631
<BONDS>                                           4210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        115
<COMMON>                                           966
<OTHER-SE>                                       (548)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5956
<SALES>                                           2381
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2381
<CGS>                                             2004
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    19
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (315)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (111)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (204)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (13)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (217)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.23)
        

</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-12-00043-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

JONATHAN DAVID KIRK, Appellant,

v.

ERIN RUTHERFORD KIRK, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 359th District Court 

of Montgomery County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant Jonathan David Kirk, acting pro se, filed an appeal from a judgment 

entered by the 359th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, in cause number

10-12-13214. Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and requests that this 

Court dismiss the appeal.
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to 

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby 

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) 

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). 

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be 

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

26th day of July, 2012.
Exhibit 10.35**2006 SECTION 16 OFFICER BONUS PLAN**Section 16 Officer Plan for Calendar Year 2006     Plan Design **•** Payment Eligibility – The goals must be met in order to be eligible for Bonus payment  – Each Goal is measured independently **•** Timing – Annual plan **•** All components measured at year end **•** Bonus Potential: **•** Jerry Chase – Target Bonus = $300,000  **•** Mark Richman – Target Bonus = $225,000 **•** Goals:               % of Bonus Tied to**2006** At Target this GoalRevenue $61M   50%EBITDA ($7.2M)  50%  results in 100% bonus payment
# Fou rth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 2, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 004 60

- CR

Victor RIGGAN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the County Court at Law, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR17132 8 Honorable Susan Harris, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On July 9, 2018, the trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record in this court. On July 18, 2018, the trial court clerk filed a supplemental recor d. However, neither the original nor the supplemental record includes a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal as required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 25.2(a)(2), which states “[t]he trial court shall enter a

certification of the defendant’s right to appeal each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2).

Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court clerk to supplement the appellate record with

the trial court’s certif

ication of defendant’s right to appeal on or before August 17, 2018

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of August, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1




                       TERAYON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Zaki Rakib, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

        (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



Date: March 27, 2003                By:  /s/ Zaki Rakib
                                         ----------------------
                                         Zaki Rakib
                                         Chief Executive Officer