alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Statement of Chief Executive Officer Furnished
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 The undersigned, Kim S. Price, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the “Company”).
 
 This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”).
 
 By execution of this statement, I certify that:
 
 A)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
 
 B)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
 
 
 
 
 March 16, 2011                                                                          /s/ Kim S. Price
 Dated                                                                          Kim S. Price
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### HOSKINS v. STATE.

No. 23383.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 5, 1946.

*956No appearance for appellant.

A. C. Winborn, Cr. Dist. Atty., and E. T. Branch, Asst. Cr. Dist. Atty., both of Houston, and Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the theft of corporeal personal property over the value of fifty dollars. The punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for life as an habitual criminal.

The indictment in this case, in addition to charging theft, charged two prior convictions of felonies less than capital.

Appellant’s only contention is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction. We have carefully reviewed the record from which we have reached a different conclusion.

There is but one issue upon which appellant’s evidence is in conflict with that introduced by the State, as will appear from a brief statement of the salient facts proven on the trial. The State proved by Jack Farris that on the afternoon of the 24th day of July, he parked his 1940 model Ford Coupe on Travis Street; that about two hours later, when he returned, his car was gone. He immediately reported the matter to the Police Department and gave them a description of the car and the license number. Later, in the afternoon, Mr. Fabian, a policeman, saw the car at the intersection of Preston Avenue and Crawford Street, and noticed that appellant was driving it. He stopped him, arrested him and carried him to the police station. Farris testified that he did not give his consent to appellant to take his coupe; that it was taken from where he had parked it without his knowledge or consent. Appellant testified that he met Jack Farris about 1:00 P.M., and asked him to loan him his car for the purpose of driving to a designated place with a view of obtaining employment; that Farris told him O.K., and as a result of the reply made by Farris, he took the car and drove it-while seeking a job.

Appellant’s former convictions were duly proved, and no questions were raised concerning them other than that he claimed in his motion for a new trial that the conviction in Tarrant County was for a capital offense, to-wit, robbery by the use of firearms. This was at variance with the judgment of conviction in said case.

It will be noted that really the only issue in the case was whether or not appellant took the automobile in question without or with the consent of the owner, and this issue the jury decided adversely to his contention. This court is bound ■ by the conclusion reached by the jury upon any controverted issue of fact.

From what we have said it follows that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
**CERTIFICATE
      OF CORRECTION**


**OF**


**WHERIFY
      WIRELESS, INC.**







Wherify
      Wireless, Inc. (the “ *Corporation* ”),
      a
      corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General
      Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the *“Law”* ),
      does
      hereby certify:




1.  The
      name
      of the Corporation is Wherify Wireless, Inc.




2.  A
      Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the
      Secretary of State of Delaware (the “ *Certificate* ”)
      on
      July 22, 2005 and that the Certificate requires correction as permitted by
      Section 103 of the Law.




3.  The
      inaccuracy or defect of the Certificate is as follows:




**RESOLVED
      FURTHER** ,
      that
      Section B of the Article FOURTH of the Amended and Restated Certificate of
      Incorporation of IQ Biometrix, Inc., be amended and restated as
      follows:




“The
      total number of shares of capital stock of all classes which the Corporation
      shall have the authority to issue is One Hundred Ten Million (110,000,000)
      dividend into One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of Common Stock of the
      par value of one cent($0.01) per share; and Ten Million (10,000,000) shares
      of
      Preferred Stock of the par value on one cent ($0.01) per share.”




4.  The
      above
      resolution is corrected to read as follows:




**RESOLVED
      FURTHER** ,
      that
      the introductory paragraphs of Article FOURTH of the Amended and Restated
      Certificate of Incorporation of IQ Biometrix, Inc., beginning with “Effective
      Upon” and ending with “($0.01) per share,” be amended and restated as
      follows:




“The
      total number of shares of capital stock of all classes which the Corporation
      shall have the authority to issue is One Hundred Ten Million (110,000,000)
      dividend into One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of Common Stock of the
      par value of one cent ($0.01) per share; and Ten Million (10,000,000) shares
      of
      Preferred Stock of the par value of one cent ($0.01) per share.”




**IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF** ,
      the
      Corporation has caused this Certificate of Correction to be signed by an
      authorized officer of the Corporation, this 15th day of February
      2007.




**Wherify
              Wireless, Inc.**By:
            /s/ Mark
              E.
              GitterName:
                Mark E. Gitter
              Title:
                Chief Financial Officer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration
 AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the renewals of certain FDA advisory committees by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs (the Commissioner). The Commissioner has determined that it is in the public interest to renew the charters of the committees listed below for an additional 2 years beyond charter expiration date. The new charters will be in effect until the dates of expiration listed below. This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act of October 6, 1972 (Pubic Law 92-463 (5 U.S.C. app. 2)).
 DATES: Authority for these committees will expire on the dates indicated below unless the Commissioner formally determines that renewal is in the public interest. Name of committee
Date of expirationGastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee
March 3, 2002Advisory Committee for Reproductive Health Drugs
March 23, 2002Arthritis Advisory Committee
April 5, 2002Veterinary Medicine Advisory Committee
April 24, 2002Anesthetic and Life Support Drugs Advisory Committee
May 1, 2002Blood Products Advisory Committee
May 13, 2002Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee
May 30, 2002Drug Abuse Advisory Committee
May 31, 2002Science Advisory Board to the National Center for Toxicological Research
June 2, 2002Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee
June 4, 2002Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee
June 4, 2002Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies Advisory Committee
June 9, 2002Science Board to the Food and Drug Administration
June 26, 2002Allergenic Products Advisory Committee
July 9, 2002Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee
August 27, 2002Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee
August 27, 2002Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee
September 1, 2002
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna M. Combs, Committee Management Office (HFA-306), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville MD 20857, 301-827-5496. Dated: October 23, 2000. Linda A. Suydam, Senior Associate Commissioner.


[FR Doc. 00-27835 Filed 10-30-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
**Exhibit 31.01****CERTIFICATIONS**I, John C. Harris, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Viseon, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     */s/ John C. Harris*       John C. Harris    Chief Executive Officer  Date: November 14, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         264,324
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               270,774
<PP&E>                                         679,006
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,347
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 899,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,065
<BONDS>                                        504,792
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,605
<OTHER-SE>                                     337,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   899,784
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,731
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  102,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,499
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,299
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,299
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000936448
<NAME> NUMBER NINE VISUAL TECH. CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                          10,175
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,334
<ALLOWANCES>                                        88
<INVENTORY>                                      6,440
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,559
<PP&E>                                           2,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,861
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            91
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,958
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,910
<SALES>                                         13,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,964
<CGS>                                           11,550
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,357)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,357)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23
<PAGE>


                  [Stewart, Fowler & Stalvey, P.C. Letterhead]


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


     We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 333-79893) of Quitman Bancorp,  Inc., of our
report  dated  October 15,  1999,  relating to the  consolidated  statements  of
financial  condition of Quitman Bancorp,  Inc. as of September 30, 1999 and 1998
and  the  related  consolidated  statements  of  income,  comprehensive  income,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended,

                                /s/ Stewart, Fowler & Stalvey, P.C.


Valdosta, Georgia
December 23, 1999
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 52 (Thursday, March 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14659-14660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6226]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-R07-SFUND-2011-0285; FRL-9281-3]

Proposed CERCLA Administrative ``Cost Recovery'' Settlement; The 
Goldfield Corporation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
administrative settlement for recovery of past and projected future 
response costs concerning the Newton County Mine Tailings Superfund 
Site in Newton County, Missouri with the following settling party: The 
Goldfield Corporation. The settlement requires the settling party to 
pay $76,630, to the Hazardous Substance Superfund. The settlement 
includes a covenant not to sue the settling party pursuant to Sections 
106 and 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607(a). For thirty (30) 
days following the date of publication of this notice, the Agency will 
receive written comments relating to the settlement. The Agency will 
consider all

[[Page 14660]]

comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the 
settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations which 
indicate that the settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. 
The Agency's response to any comments received will be available for 
public inspection at: Granby City Hall, 302 North Main Street, Granby, 
Missouri 64844; Neosho Public Library, 201 West Spring Street, Neosho, 
Missouri 64850; and Environmental Protection Agency, Region VII Docket 
Room, 901 North Fifth Street, Kansas City, KS 66101.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before April 18, 2011.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement is available for public inspection 
at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region VII Docket Room, 901 
North Fifth Street, Kansas City, KS 66101. A copy of the proposed 
settlement may be obtained from Kathy Robinson, Regional Hearing Clerk, 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region VII, 901 North Fifth Street, 
Kansas City, KS 66101, 913-551-7567. Comments should reference the 
Newton County Mine Tailings Superfund Site, Newton County, Missouri, 
and EPA Docket No. CERCLA-07-2011-0002, and should be addressed to 
Kathy Robinson, Regional Hearing Clerk, Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region VII, 901 North Fifth Street, Kansas City, KS 66101.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. Mark Doolan, Remedial Project 
Manager, Superfund Division, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
VII, 901 North Fifth Street, Kansas City, KS 66101, 
doolan.mark@epa.gov; or at 913-551-7169.

    Dated: March 8, 2011.
Cecilia Tapia,
Director, Superfund Division, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2011-6226 Filed 3-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-60-000]

Take notice that on October 20, 2000, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America (Natural) tendered for filing to be part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the filing, to be effective November 20, 2000.

Natural states that these sheets were filed is to make several minor revisions to its Tariff, including changes to the General Terms and Conditions and to Natural's Rate Schedules IBS, FFTS, FRSS, NSS and  DSS. These changes correct several provisions of Natural's Tariff and clarify others, conform various provisions of Natural's Tariff to each other or incorporate current Commission policy.

Natural requests waiver of the Commission's Regulations to the extent necessary to permit the tariff sheets submitted to become effective November 20, 2000.

Natural states that copies of the filing have been mailed to its customers and interested state regulatory agencies.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http;//www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-27857 Filed 10-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M