alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**
 **PURSUANT
        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of YM BioSciences Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
        20-F for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Leonard Vernon, Vice President,
        Finance and Administration of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
  1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  By: */s/
        Leonard Vernon*
 Leonard
        Vernon
 Vice
        President, Finance and Administration
  September
        22 ,
        2008
#### Ex parte PADGETT.

No. 24914.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 7, 1950.

Waldo E. Ximenes, San Antonia, Grover C. Morris, San Antonio, for appellant,

. George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*814DAVIDSON, Judge.

Relator, by writ of habeas corpus, seeks his discharge from the penitentiary, where he is confined serving a sentence imposed by the judgment of the District Court of Bell County, which judgment- and sentence he claims to' be null and void.

The penitentiary authorities, respondents here, show that, in addition to the judgment complained of, relator is held in that institution serving, also, a sentence imposed by the District "Court of Kendall County.

The validity of the Bell -County judgment does not affect relator’s incarceration under the Kendall County-judgment. Only if relator’s confinement in the penitentiary rested alone upon the Bell County judgment would this court order his discharge thereunder. Ex parte Neisler, 126 Tex.Cr.R. 26, 69 S.W.2d 422; Ex parte Kemp, Tex.Cr.App., 230 S.W.2d 232; Ex parte Richardson, Tex.Cr.App., 230 S.W.2d 538.

The writ of habeas corpus is refused.

Opinion approved by the court.
exv10w22



 






Exhibit 10.22




Executive Bonus Plan



Each named executive officer is eligible for an annual bonus equal to 70%-100% of his base salary
assuming the plan payments are made at target. Bonus payments are based on our overall achievement
of our financial plan and individual contributions. The financial plan component, which represents
70% of the bonus opportunity, is determined by assessing our achievement of specified Adjusted
EBITDA (defined as Consolidated EBITDA in our senior secured credit facility) and revenue
thresholds. The targets of the bonus plan can be adjusted by a range of performance within a
minimum to maximum threshold varying bonus payments between 25% and 250% percent of target. To be
eligible for a bonus payment, the executive officer must demonstrate satisfactory performance,
contribution and effort consistent with his peer group. Bonus payments are typically made in the
first quarter of each calendar year reflecting accomplishments of the prior calendar year. Bonus
payments will not be made if the minimum Adjusted EBITDA threshold is not met.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Abgenix, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



March 11,
2004

| |  | /s/BARBARA RICHING                                                   
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Barbara Riching                                                      
| |  | Senior Director, Finance
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Abgenix, Inc. and will be retained by Abgenix, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1



                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V (the Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. for
the period ended December 26, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel, Regular Trustee
of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Trust.


                                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V


                                    By:   /s/ MARLENE DEBEL
                                         ------------------
                                    Name:     Marlene Debel*
                                    Title:    Regular Trustee



Dated: March 26, 2009
---------------------

*  Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Trust for purposes of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.1

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winfield Capital
Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul A.
Perlin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  August 12, 2005             By: /s/ PAUL A. PERLIN
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Paul A. Perlin
                                        Chief Executive Officer & Director


      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                      -25-
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-15(e) AND 15D-15(e),  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Kenneth H. Traub, certify that:

(1)    I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Bank Note Holographics, Inc.;

(2)    Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(5)    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|                     |  |                                                                         
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 23, 2004 |  | /s/KENNETH H. TRAUBKenneth H Traub
President and Chief Executive Officer

---

QuickLinks
Diagram – Reactants 

Sanitized
Additional details regarding the 2004 Awards.



 Exhibit 10.18(a) 
 Additional Details Regarding the 2004 Awards 
 On February 5, 2004, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of Arch Chemicals, Inc. granted and set performance goals for performance share units and performance share retention units under, and subject to, the Arch Chemicals, Inc. 1999 Long Term Incentive Plan. The performance share units pay out
in cash if a certain return on equity (“ROE”) is met for the second or third calendar year of the three-year performance period. The performance share retention units are similar to the performance share units except if no payout results
due to the failure to reach the minimum required ROE target by the end of the three-year period, the units will payout following 2009 if the executive is still employed by the Company at that time.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SHAWALI KHAN,

Petitioner,

v. Civil Action No. 08-1101 (JDB)

BARACK OBAMA, et al.,

 Respondents.

ORDER

Upon consideration of [247] Respondents' Unopposed Motion to Deem Protected

Information Highlighted in the Accompanying Proposed Public Factual Return for ISN 899, and

a review of that proposed public factual return, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondents'

motion is GRANTED. The information identified by Respondents with green or gray

highlighting in the version of the factual return submitted under seal to the Court is deemed

protected, pursuant to paragraphs 10 and 34 of the Protective Order governing this proceeding. 

It is further ORDERED that Respondents file on the public record, through the Court's

Electronic Case Filing system, a public version of the factual return from which the information

that was highlighted in gray or green in the proposed public version submitted to the Court has

been redacted.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ 

JOHN D. BATES

 United States District Judge

Date: March 21, 2012
#### BRADFORD v. POWELL. POWELL v. BRADFORD.

Nos. 26566, 26567.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Oct. 7, 1942.

Austin Y. Bryan and Bryan & Bryan, all of Houston, and C. A. Erickson and Styles & Erickson, all of Bay City, for Mrs. Bradford.

Fuller C. Blackwood and B. C. Johnson, both of Houston, for Powell.

ALEXANDER, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff sued the defendant for damages for personal injuries. The defendant filed a plea of privilege to be sued in the county of her residence, and requested a trial thereon prior to the trial on the merits. This request was overruled, and the defendant was forced to try the plea of privilege before the jury along with the trial on the merits. Judgment was for plaintiff on all issues. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment on the merits, but affirmed the judgment overruling the plea of privilege. Each party has applied for a writ of error.

The ruling of the trial court in refusing to allow the defendant a separate trial on her plea of privilege prior to a trial on the merits, and the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals in affirming the judgment of the trial court in overruling the plea of privilege, under such circumstances, are in direct conflict with the holding of this Court in Newlin v. Smith, 136 Tex. 260, 150 S.W.2d 233. In that case this Court held that a defendant is entitled to a trial on his plea of privilege before being required to go to trial on the merits.

Rule No. 483 of Texas Rules of Civil Procedure provides, in effect, that if the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals is in conflict with a previous opinion of the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court may in its discretion, without the necessity of granting the writ and hearing the case, reverse and remand the same on the application for writ of error. Accordingly, in view of the conflict hereinabove pointed out, the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals in so far as it affirms the judgment of the trial court on the plea of privilege is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a new trial. The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals reversing the judgment of the trial court on the merits will not be disturbed.
Martin, Michael (OSn

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Don Pozzi <dpozzi@vctx.org>

Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:33 AM

Martin, Michael (OSn

Victoria Regional Airport 2014 EASProposal

;',11. '" \' 8 . '/ Cl _".,,'i .,n - I.J, I : n~]

This is to confirm that Victoria County Commissioners Court agrees with the statements as set out in the May 5

th email

by our Airport Manager. It truly reflects the views of the majority of the community and is in the best interest of those

we serve.

Judge Pozzi

Victoria County Judge

1
EXHIBIT 99.1


                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viseon, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John Harris, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 18, 2002                            By      /s/ John Harris
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
#### ADAMS v. STATE.

No. 22816.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 5, 1944.

*510C. O. McMillan, of Stephenville, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of possession of whiskey in a dry area for the purpose of sale. His punishment was assessed at a fine of $250.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### SPENCER v. STATE.

No. 26127.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 17, 1952.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The unlawful sale of whisky in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $350.

In the absence of a statement of facts or bills of exception, nothing is presented for consideration.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3307 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3307

 To authorize microenterprise assistance for renewable energy projects 
                        in developing countries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 22, 2013

  Mr. Israel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize microenterprise assistance for renewable energy projects 
                        in developing countries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may cited as the ``Solar Villages Initiative Act''.

SEC. 2. MICROENTERPRISE ASSISTANCE FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS IN 
              DEVELOPING COUNTRIES.

    (a) In General.--The President, acting through the Administrator of 
the United States Agency for International Development and in 
consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy, 
is authorized to provide assistance for renewable energy projects 
described in subsection (b) in developing countries to increase the 
availability of credit, savings, and other services to microfinance and 
microenterprise clients lacking full access to capital, training, 
technical assistance, and business development services.
    (b) Types of Projects.--The renewable energy projects described in 
this subsection include projects to assist small and micro businesses 
that loan or sell solar lanterns or lamps and other solar energy 
technologies.
    (c) Priority.--In providing assistance under subsection (a), the 
President shall give priority to empowering female-owned businesses in 
developing countries.
    (d) Relation to Existing Authorities.--Assistance provided under 
subsection (a) shall be made available under the authorities of section 
252 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2211a).
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the President to carry out this section $5,000,000 for 
fiscal year 2015, $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2016, $7,500,000 for 
fiscal year 2017, $7,500,000 for fiscal year 2018, $10,000,000 for 
fiscal year 2019, and $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2020.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-4145]

Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), an investigation was initiated on August 21, 1999 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Wolverine World Wide, Incorporated, Rockford, Michigan.

An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers remains in effect (NAFTA-2668), which expires on January 25, 2001. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of October 2000.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-27566  Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of European Micro Holdings, Inc. (the
“ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:October 16, 2006
              By:
              */s/
                John B. Gallagher*Name:John
                  B. GallagherTitle:Co-Chief Executive Officer
  Date:October 16, 2006
              By:
              */s/
                Harry D. Shields*Name: Harry
                D. ShieldsTitle:Co-Chief Executive Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to European Micro Holdings, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by European Micro Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.