alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Texas Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Texas Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Reserves Divestitures (Billion Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4,810  | 3,086  | 4,134  | 2,699  | 2,958  | 4,396  | 4,906  | 6,276  | 3,248  | 2,026 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,807  | 21,329 | 3,018  | 3,781  | 7,201  | 4,614  | 7,774  | 4,457  | 5,226  | 5,236 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4,475  | 4,496  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 12/30/2022                                                                                                         
|Next Release Date: 12/29/2023
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-60559

Conference Calendar

 

MATTHEW A. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA;

PHILLIP MCLAURIN; BRIMAH, DR.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:97-CV-188-B-B

- - - - - - - - - -

oOctober 20, 1999

Before JONES, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Matthew A. Williams, Mississippi prisoner #33555, appeals

the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, with prejudice,

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted. Williams contends that the defendants were deliberately

indifferent to his serious medical needs. However, the facts alleged in

his complaint and expanded at the Spears hearing indicate that
No. 98-60559

- 2 -

Williams received extensive 

medical care for his injured knee, including surgery. Thus,

whatever deficiencies there may have been in Williams’s

treatment, if any, certainly do not rise to the level of

establishing deliberate indifference on the part of the

defendants. See Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Accordingly,

the district court did not err in dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. 

Williams’s appeal is without merit and therefore frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R.

42.2. The district court’s dismissal of the present case and our

dismissal of this appeal count as two strikes against Williams

for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We caution Williams that

once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed IFP in any

civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained

in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1996 Incentive Stock Plan, the 1998
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1998 Director Option Plan, and the 1999 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan of Abgenix, Inc., and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.
333-91699 and 333-82837) and in the related Prospectuses of Abgenix, Inc. of our report dated January 24, 2002 (except note 13 as to which the date is
March 11, 2002), with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Abgenix, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2001.

| |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
| |  | ---------------------

Palo
Alto, California
March 28, 2002

---

QuickLinks
#### FUSTON v. CONSOLIDATION COAL CO. et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 12, 1954.

J. K. Beasley, Harlan, for appellant.

Harry L. Moore, Whitesburg, for appel-lee.

WADDILL, Commissioner.

This appeal is from a judgment confirming an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Board dismissing appellant’s application for compensation for disability allegedly resulting from silicosis contracted in ap-pellee’s coal mine. In view of the compensation board’s finding of fact that appellant had not accepted the provisions of the silicosis section of the compensation Act, KRS 342.005(2), prior to his alleged injury, our chief concern is whether the board’s finding on this jurisdictional question was supported by evidence of probative value.

In 1946, the appellee purchased a coal mine in Harlan County in which the’ appellant had been employed as a motorman for 23 years. Appéllaut continued working for appellee in the same capacity until *939August 13, 1951; when he ceased workiijg because of illness, later diagnosed as silicosis. He has not worked since that date, although his employment with appellee had not been terminated when he executed the agreement with appellee on October 29, 1951, to accept the provisions of the silicosis section of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

The appellee elected to operate under the silicosis section of the Act in March, 1951. The appellant testified that he signed ap-pellee’s compensation register on two occasions, once in April, 1951, and again on October 29, 1951.

The evidence introduced before the board shows rather convincingly that appellant signed and accepted the silicosis provisions of the Act on October 29, 1951, rather than in April, 1951. Several of the officials of appellee’s company so testified and their testimony is supported by . the written records of the transaction. Appellant’s proof upon this question was inconclusive. We have frequently said that in reviewing proceedings before the Workmen’s Compensation Board we will not disturb the full board’s finding of fact if there is competent evidence of probative value to sustain it. Fordson Coal Co. v. Palko, 282 Ky. 397, 138 S.W.2d 456; Parker v. Frankfort Distilling Co., 312 Ky. 279, 227 S.W.2d 195.

Since the appellant was not exposed to the hazards of the disease of silicosis in the employment of the appellee following his acceptance of the silicosis section of the compensation Act on October 29, 1951, we find that the circuit court properly confirmed the order entered by the compensation board dismissing appellant’s application for compensation. The appellant’s acceptance of the Workmen’s Compensation Act after injury cannot have retroactive effect to authorize recovery of compensation. Kouns v. Josselson Brothers, 236 Ky. 379, 33 S.W.2d 346.

Judgment affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAVIER SOLORIO-ALCARAZ, 

Petitioner,

 v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-73800

Agency No. A097-267-752

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 12, 2017** 

San Francisco, California

Before: TASHIMA and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and LEITMAN,*** District Judge.

FILED

OCT 16 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Matthew Frederick Leitman, United States District

Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.
Javier Solorio-Alcaraz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) determination that he suffered a

conviction for immigration purposes and was ineligible for cancellation of removal

under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). This court has jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and

reviews questions of law de novo. Retuta v. Holder, 591 F.3d 1181, 1184 (9th Cir.

2010).

The Immigration Judge and BIA correctly determined that Solorio-Alcaraz’s

plea of no contest to possession of a controlled substance for sale under Nevada

Revised Statutes § 453.337 is a conviction for immigration purposes. A criminal

proceeding constitutes a “conviction” where adjudication of guilt has been

withheld if “the alien has entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere” and “the

judge has ordered some form of punishment, penalty, or restraint on the alien’s

liberty to be imposed.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(48)(A)(i)-(ii); see also Reyes v. Lynch,

834 F.3d 1104, 1108 (9th Cir. 2016) (holding that “a state conviction expunged

under state law is still a conviction for purposes of eligibility for cancellation of

removal” and that “the federal definition of conviction is satisfied regardless of the

rehabilitative purpose of probation, where the alien was punished or his liberty was

restrained by the terms of his probation”). Solorio-Alcaraz entered a plea of nolo

contendere and the conditions imposed by the Nevada District Court were

2
restraints on his liberty. Accordingly, he was convicted of a controlled substance

offense and is statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1229b(b)(1)(C). 

The petition for review is DENIED.

3
Yellowstone - Worst - Total Extinction Yellowstone - Worst - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

NO3

Extinction

YELL2 NIA 2000 20 40.87 YELL2 NIA 2000 20 1.97

YELL2 NIA 2001 22 38.88 YELL2 NIA 2001 22 2.36

YELL2 NIA 2002 22 31.83 YELL2 NIA 2002 22 1.63

YELL2 NIA 2003 21 31.37 YELL2 NIA 2003 21 1.43

YELL2 NIA 2004 23 29.79 YELL2 NIA 2004 23 1.46

172.74 Total 8.85 Total

34.548 Average 1.77 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 5%

Yellowstone - Best - Total Extinction Yellowstone - Best - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

NO3

Extinction

YELL2 NIA 2000 19 13.24 YELL2 NIA 2000 19 0.88

YELL2 NIA 2001 21 13.55 YELL2 NIA 2001 21 0.76

YELL2 NIA 2002 21 12.99 YELL2 NIA 2002 21 0.82

YELL2 NIA 2003 20 12.15 YELL2 NIA 2003 20 0.53

YELL2 NIA 2004 22 13.03 YELL2 NIA 2004 22 0.62

64.96 Total 3.61 Total

12.992 Average 0.722 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 6%

North Absaroka - Worst - Total Extinction North Absaroka - Worst - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

NO3

Site Method Year N Extinction Site Method Year N Extinction Extinction

NOAB1 NIA 2002 22 28.72 NOAB1 NIA 2002 22 2.26

NOAB1 NIA 2003 21 41.43 NOAB1 NIA 2003 21 1.05

NOAB1 NIA 2004 23 28.05 NOAB1 NIA 2004 23 1.5

98.2 Total 4.81 Total

32.73333 Average 1.6033333 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 5%

North Absaroka - Best - Total Extinction North Absaroka - Best - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

NO3

Extinction

NOAB1 NIA 2002 21 12.55 NOAB1 NIA 2002 21 0.45

NOAB1 NIA 2003 21 12.07 NOAB1 NIA 2003 21 0.3

NOAB1 NIA 2004 22 12.21 NOAB1 NIA 2004 22 0.36

36.83 Total 1.11 Total

12.27667 Average 0.37 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 3%

Bridger - Worst - Total Extinction Bridger - Worst - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

NO3

Extinction

BRID1 NIA 2000 22 31.07 BRID1 NIA 2000 22 1.26

BRID1 NIA 2001 23 30.02 BRID1 NIA 2001 23 1.5

BRID1 NIA 2002 22 34.56 BRID1 NIA 2002 22 1.72

BRID1 NIA 2003 24 34.04 BRID1 NIA 2003 24 1.06

BRID1 NIA 2004 25 28.3 BRID1 NIA 2004 25 1.59

157.99 Total 7.13 Total

31.598 Average 1.426 Average g

2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 5%

Bridger - Best - Total Extinction Bridger - Best - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

NO3

Extinction

BRID1 NIA 2000 21 12.89 BRID1 NIA 2000 21 0.39

BRID1 NIA 2001 22 12.9 BRID1 NIA 2001 22 0.5

BRID1 NIA 2002 22 12.33 BRID1 NIA 2002 22 0.51

BRID1 NIA 2003 23 11.83 BRID1 NIA 2003 23 0.33

BRID1 NIA 2004 24 11.96 BRID1 NIA 2004 24 0.4

61.91 Total 2.13 Total

12.382 Average 0.426 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 3%
<PAGE>
 
                                              Exhibit 11


                   NUMBER NINE VISUAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

     STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE (1)(2)

                     (in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                 Three months Ended
                                          MARCH 29, 1997   MARCH 30, 1996
                                          ---------------  ---------------
HISTORICAL
<S>                                       <C>              <C>
Common Stock Outstanding, beginning of             
 the period                                         9,053            8,758
Weighted average cheap stock                            -                -
Weighted average redeemable common stock                -                -
Weighted average number of common stock                
 issued                                                23               74
Weighted average of common stock                       
 equivalents                                            -                -
Less:  assumed purchase of treasury             
 shares                                                 -                -
                                                  -------           ------ 
Weighted average number of common and
 common equivalent shares outstanding               9,077            8,832
                                                  =======           ======
 
Net income (loss)                                 $(2,358)          $ (570)
                                                  =======           ======
 
Net income (loss) per share                       $ (0.26)          $(0.06)
 
</TABLE>
     (1)  Primary and fully diluted calculation are substantially the same.
 
     (2)  In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting
          Bulletin No. 83, issuances of common stock and common stock
          equivalents, within one year prior to the initial filing of the
          registration statement, at share prices below the assumed mid-point of
          the initial public offering price of $11 per share (cheap stock), are
          considered to have been made in anticipation of the Company's initial
          public offering.  Accordingly, these stock issuances are treated as if
          issued and outstanding, using the treasury stock method for stock
          options, since the inception of the Company.

                                       18
<PAGE>   1


                  EXHIBIT 21.1 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                       Other Names Under Which
              Subsidiary                     Jurisdiction of Incorporation          Such Subsidiary Does Business
              ----------                     -----------------------------          -----------------------------
<S>                                          <C>                                    <C>
GCW Holdings, Inc.                                      Delaware                                None

Costura Dominicana, Inc.                                Delaware                                None

GCI IP Sub, Inc.                                        Delaware                                None

Auburn Hosiery Mills, Inc                               Kentucky                                None

GCI Spainco, S.L.                                        Spain                                  None

Sport Socks Co. (Ireland) Ltd.                          Ireland                                 None

Sport Socks Co. (UK) Limited                         United Kingdom                             None

Sport Socks Co. (Belgium) BVBA                          Belgium                                 None

Gerber Childrenswear Canada, Inc.                       Delaware                                None

Costura Matamoros S.A. de C.V.                           Mexico                                 None

GCW Mexico S.A. de C.V.                                  Mexico                                 None
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,058,516
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  744,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                   271,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,331,123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,201,731
<PP&E>                                         622,007
<DEPRECIATION>                                 988,265
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,823,738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,861,582
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,375
<OTHER-SE>                                     746,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,823,738
<SALES>                                      2,748,754
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,748,754
<CGS>                                        1,389,285
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,389,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,694,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             102,902
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,438,020)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,438,020)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,438,020)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                              94
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,301
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         29
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,535
<PP&E>                                           2,931
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,791
<BONDS>                                            380
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,428
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,652
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,259
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    114
<INCOME-TAX>                                        51
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 63
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        63
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the consolidated financial statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>