alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3287 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3287

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide veterans service 
 organizations with the same access to Department of Veterans Affairs 
  facilities during the Government shutdown as such organizations had 
       immediately prior to the shutdown, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2013

    Mr. McNerney (for himself, Mr. Jones, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. 
 Thompson of California, Mr. Holt, Ms. Brownley of California, and Mr. 
Miller of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide veterans service 
 organizations with the same access to Department of Veterans Affairs 
  facilities during the Government shutdown as such organizations had 
       immediately prior to the shutdown, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Services Support Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCESS OF VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS TO ALLOCATED SPACE IN 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS FACILITIES DURING THE 
              GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, during any period after 
September 30, 2013, for which interim or full-year appropriations for 
the Department of Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2014 have not been 
enacted, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall ensure that employees 
of the Department who are excepted from furlough during any such period 
provide--
            (1) veterans service organizations with the same access to 
        Department of Veterans Affairs facilities as such organizations 
        had on September 30, 2013;
            (2) veterans with the same access to veterans service 
        organizations using such facilities as was provided on 
        September 30, 2013; and
            (3) such services as may be necessary to ensure the safety 
        and security of such veterans and veterans service 
        organizations in the same manner as was provided on September 
        30, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PETER JOHN DIMITRION,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2099

[January 11, 2024]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Hon. William L. Roby, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 431994CF001318A. 

Peter John Dimitrion, Stuart, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### MARIE ROLLA *v.*MARIO ROLLA

*David P. Burke,*in support of the petition.

*Lawrence P. Weisman,*in opposition.

Decided July 8, 1998

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 732 (AC 16368), is denied.
Description of Short-term Compensation Plan	Exhibit 10.12 






        As
part of the total compensation package for the nine top executive officers who are members
of the Company’s Senior Leadership Team and other executives (the
“Executives”), the Management Continuity and Compensation Committee
(“MCC”) of the Board of Directors sets consolidated earnings before tax
(“EBT”) and specific business unit operating targets for the Company, usually in
the month of February for a given year. The MCC then grants contingent award values to the
Executives pursuant to the Bandag, Incorporated Stock Grant and Awards Plan. The award
values are typically based on a percentage of the target compensations for the Executives
set by the MCC. The awards are payable in cash if the EBT and/or business unit operating
profits targets are met. The EBT and business unit operating profits are determined after
the release of financial results for the year in which the contingent awards were made.
For example, contingent awards made in February 2006 will be based on financial results
for the year ended December 31, 2006 and, if the targets are met, cash will be granted in
February 2007 in satisfaction of the contingent awards. 



        The
MCC sets the EBT and business unit operating profits targets and award values to the
Executives as follows: the first is a Threshold EBT and a Threshold business unit
operating profits number, below which no cash payments are made and, if met, provides for
the lowest award value; the second is a Target EBT and a Target business unit operating
profits number, which provides for a higher award value if the Target EBT and/or the
Target business unit operating profits number is met; and the third is a superior EBT and
a Superior business unit operating profits number, which provides for the highest award
value if the Superior EBT and/or Superior business unit operating profits number is met.
If EBT or the applicable business unit operating profits number falls between identified
target EBT or the applicable business unit operating profits numbers, arithmetical
interpolation is used to determine the award value. 



        The
executive officers who are members of the Senior Leadership Team and who are receiving the
contingent awards currently are: 



	Martin G. Carver	Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
	
Dennis M. Fox	Vice President, Manufacturing Design
	
Warren W. Heidbreder	Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
	
John C. McErlane	
Vice President of the Company and President of Tire Distribution 
Systems, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company
	
Frederico V. Kopittke	Vice President, International
	
Michael A. Tirona	Vice President and General Manager - Europe
	
Janet R. Sichterman	Vice President, North American Fleet Sales
	
Andrew M. Sisler	Vice President, North American Franchise Sales
	
Timothy Chen	Vice President, Innovation






        In
addition, awards were currently made to two additional executive officers, David W. Dahms,
Director, Treasury Services and Treasurer, and Jeffrey C. Pattison, Vice President and
Corporate Controller.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: July

9, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

– 2013
- 0602 FROM: Region 7 , EPA SUBJECT: July

9, 2014 , Meeting Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A conference call was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on July 9, 2014 to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

. The majority of the discussion centered on how goals were established for the state of Iowa. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2 , 2014
. **ATTENDEES** EPA Headqua rters: Jan Cortelyou - Lee Brian Fisher Ry an Sims Erich Eschmann EPA Region 7: Joshua Tapp Mark A. Smith Ward Burns Larry Gonzalez Toni Gargas Io wa Department of Natural Resources: Catherine Fitzsimmons Marnie Stein Christine Paulson Chris Roling
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27455]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Biological Response Modifiers Advisory Committee; Notice of 
Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory 
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will 
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Biological Response Modifiers Advisory 
Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and 
recommendations to the agency on FDA's regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on November 16 and 17, 
2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Location: Holiday Inn, Versailles Ballrooms I and II, 8120 
Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD.
    Contact Person: Gail M. Dapolito or Rosanna L. Harvey, Center 
for Biologics Evaluation and Research (HFM-71), Food and Drug 
Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-827-
0314, or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 
(301-443-0572 in the Washington, DC area), code 12389. Please call 
the Information Line for up-to-date information on this meeting.
    Agenda: On November 16 and 17, 2000, the committee will meet to 
discuss the following issues related to gene therapy clinical 
trials: (1) Product characterization, (2) preclinical models, and 
(3) long term followup.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or 
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. 
Written submissions may be made to the contact person by November 9, 
2000. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between 
approximately 1 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. on November 16, 2000, and from 9 
a.m. to 9:30 a.m. on November 17, 2000. Time allotted for each 
presentation may be limited. Those desiring to make formal oral 
presentations should notify the contact person before November 9, 
2000, and submit a brief statement of the general nature of the 
evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses 
of proposed participants, and an indication of the approximate time 
requested to make their presentation.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: October 18, 2000.
Linda A. Suydam,
Senior Associate Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 00-27455 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
BENTON WILCOXON






                                  March 3, 2006



Investors set forth on Schedule A hereto (the "Investors")



Gentlemen:

      I,  Benton  Wilcoxon,  hereby  covenant  and agree,  that upon an Event of
Default (as defined in the Senior Secured Convertible Notes (the "Notes") issued
by Composite Technology  Corporation (the "Company") to each of the Investors on
the date hereof) by the Company under Section  4(a)(v) of any such Note,  that I
shall promptly transfer for no additional consideration,  4,741,936 (as adjusted
for stock splits,  stock  dividends,  reverse  stock splits,  reclassifications,
recapitalizations  and similar events) shares of common stock,  par value $0.001
per share, of the Company (the "Shares") to the Investors,  on a pro rata basis,
based on principal  amount of Notes held by each such Investor;  provided,  that
for each $1,000 of principal  amount of the Notes that are repaid or  converted,
the  number of Shares  that I shall be  obligated  to  deliver  hereunder  shall
reduced by 1,354.83  shares.  My  obligations  hereunder  shall  terminate  upon
repayment in full and/or complete conversion to equity securities of the Company
of all indebtedness obligations owed by the Company under the Notes.

      This letter  agreement shall be governed by the internal laws of the State
of New York,  without  giving  effect to any  choice of law or  conflict  of law
provision  or  rule  that  would  cause  the  application  of  the  law  of  any
jurisdiction other than the State of New York.

                                        Very truly yours,



                                        By: _____________________________
                                            Benton Wilcoxon






<PAGE>



                                   SCHEDULE A


Hudson Bay Fund LP

Enable Growth Partners LP

Enable Opportunity Partners LP

Pierce Diversified Strategy Master
Fund LLC

Capital Ventures International

Lane Capital Markets
{lnArchive)EPARegion9ResponsetoSPIAndersonBiologicalReviewOmSh&v:cCedricTwight07/16/201003:24PMAmyParsley,EricAibright,DaveBrownThismessageisbeingviewedinanarchive.1-TiMr.Twight,IhavesomeadditionalquestionsregardingthebiologicalassessmentthatyousubmittedandwasconductedbyMr.DarrinDoyle.ThefollowingquestionsregardingtheproposedmodificationtotheSierraPacificIndustries.Andersonfacilityarelistedbelow.CanyoualsoprovideMr.Doyle’scontactinformation?Thankyou.1.Hastherebeensuitablevalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle(VELB)habitatinthevicinityoftheprojectsitehistorically?ifso,howcloseinproximity?2.AlthoughtheBAstatesthatnoworkwilloccurwithin100feetoftheelderberryshrubsatthesite,howfarawaywillconstructionoccur?3.DuringMr.Doyle’ssitevisit,wasthesizeornumberofthenearbyelderberryshrubsmeasuredorrecorded?Ifso,a.Whatwasthediameterofthestemsoftheelderberryshrubsatgroundlevel?b.Didtheelderberryshrubscontainanybeetleexitholes?4.HowfarisSpringCreekfromtheproposedsite?5.HowfaristheSacramentoRiverfromtheproposedsite?6.HowarethepowerlinesdescribedatthebottomofPage2goingtoheconstructed?OmerShalevEnvironmentalEngineerAirPermitsOffice(Air-3)EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,Region975HawthorneSt.SanFrancisco,CA94105(415)972-3538
Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust IV (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P. for
the period ended December 26, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel, Regular Trustee
of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Trust.


                                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV


                                    By:   /s/ MARLENE DEBEL
                                          -----------------
                                    Name:     Marlene Debel*
                                    Title:    Regular Trustee



Dated: March 26, 2009
_______________________
* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer and
 Chief Financial Officer of the Trust for purposes of Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11 - 2403

In re: DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH ,

Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
. ( 2:03

- cr - 00082

- JBF

- FBS

- 1 )

Submitted : March 29, 2012 Decided: April 2, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
. Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Anthony Weymouth petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his petition for transfer of supervised release. Weymouth filed a petition for transfer of his supervised release on July 5, 2011. The next day, the dist rict court filed an order informing Weymouth that his petition was deficient and that he had thirty days to cure the deficiency or his petition would be struck from the record. Weymouth filed another petition on July 20, 2011, but there has been no furthe r action by the district court. Weymouth seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determin ed that thi s opinio n should not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 10- 10282 Su m m ar y Cal endar

T E R R YJ A M E S , P l a i n ti ff - A p p ell a n t v. R IC H A R D L E M AY ; W A N D AP A R IS H ; T H E R E S AT R IS T E IN , D efen da n t s - A pp el l an t s
A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he N or t her n D i st r i c tof Texas U SD C N o. 3: 10- C V

- 76

B ef ore R E AV L E Y , D AV IS, an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es . P E R C U R I A M: * The j udg m e nt o f t he di s t r i c t c o ur ti s a f f i r m e d f o rt he r e as o ns g i ve n b y t he
m agis t rat e j u dg e an d d i st ri ctj u dg e. F ed era lcou rts a r e li m i ted i n the i r j u ri sd i cti on . D efam a ti on or i nj u ry to
r e put at i o n i s no ta pr o t e c t e d l ibe r t y i nt e r e s tt o j us t i f y fe de r al j ur i s di c t i o n. Pa ul
v . D a v is, 9 6 S .C t. 1 1 5 5 (19 7 6 ). A n d M r. J a m e s h a s n o t c o m p la in e d of a conspir acy t o ha rm hi m becau se of hi s r ace. AF F I RMED. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D May 18, 2010 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk Case: 10-10282 Document: 00511114301 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/18/2010
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3223 

To provide for the compensation of furloughed Federal employees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 

Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. WOLF, Mr. HOYER, Ms. NORTON, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. SARBANES, Ms. EDWARDS, 

Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. RIGELL, Mr. DELANEY, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. VISCLOSKY, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of 

California, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. LEWIS, Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. 

DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. DINGELL, Ms. SPEIER, Ms. PINGREE

of Maine, Mr. ANDREWS, Ms. DELAURO, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. KEATING, Ms. 

BASS, Mr. ELLISON, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Ms. 

EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, and Mrs. LOWEY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for the compensation of furloughed Federal 

employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Ret5 roactive Pay Fairness Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3223 IH

1 SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FURLOUGHED FEDERAL EM2 PLOYEES. 

3 Federal employees furloughed as a result of any lapse 

4 in appropriations which begins on or about October 1, 

5 2013, shall be compensated at their standard rate of com6 pensation, for the period of such lapse in appropriations, 

7 as soon as practicable after such lapse in appropriations 

8 ends. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

July 17, 2012

Order 

July 17, 2012

143342(91)

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF LYON,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 143342

v COA: 294074

Oakland CC: 2007-083871-CC

McDONALD’S USA, L.L.C.,

Defendant,

and

MILFORD ROAD EAST DEVELOPMENT

ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.,

Intervening Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by Michigan Chamber Litigation Center 

for leave to file a brief amicus curiae in this case is considered and it is granted.
Summary Information

A. Applicant Information: 

(Check all that apply)

X Not a 

Consortium

Interstate 

Consortium

Intrastate 

Consortium

Community now receives EAS subsidy

X

Community (or Consortium member) previously 

received a Small Community Grant

If previous recipient, date of grant: June 26, 2002

Expiration date of grant: March 12, 2005

Federal funds requested: $217,530

Carrier(s) service obtained: N/A

Destination(s) served: N/A

B. Public/Private Partnerships: 

(List organization names)

Public Private

1. Santa Maria Public 

Airport District

1. Santa Maria Valley Chamber 

of Commerce & Visitor & 

Convention Bureau

2. Santa Maria Economic 

Development Commission

C. Project Proposal: 

(Check all that apply)

X Marketing X Start-up Cost Offset

Travel Bank X Secure Additional 

Service

Surface Transportation X New Route

Launch New Carrier Subsidy

Study X Revenue Guarantee

Upgrade Aircraft First Service

Service Restoration Other (explain 

Regional Service below):

D. Existing Landing Aids at Local Airport:

X Full ILS X Published Instrument Approach

X Localizer X Outer/Middle Marker

X Other (specify): VOR and GPS Approaches

E. Project Cost:

Line Description

Sub

Total

Total

Amount

1 Federal amount requested $490,000

2 State cash financial 

contribution $0

Local cash financial 

contribution

3a Airport cash funds $45,000

3b Non-airport cash funds $130,000

3 Total local cash funds 

(3a+3b) $175,000

4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING 

(1+2+3) $665,000

In-Kind contribution

5a Airport In-Kind

contribution** $55,000

5b Other In-Kind

contribution** $10,000

5 TOTAL IN-KIND 

CONTRIBUTION (5a+5b) $65,000

6 TOTAL PROJECT COST (4+5) $730,000

F. In-Kind Contributions:

For funds in lines 5a (Airport In-Kind contribution) and 5b (Other In-Kind 

contribution), please describe the source(s) of fund(s) for each.

5a Airport In-Kind contribution: Fee waivers

5b Other In-Kind contribution: Marketing

G. Is this application subject to review by State 

under Executive Order 12372 process?

a. This application was made available to the State 

under the Executive Order 12372. Process for 

review on (date) _____________.

b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372, but has not 

been selected by the State for review.

c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.

H. Is the Applicant delinquent on any Federal 

debt? (if “yes”, provide explanation)

No

Yes (explain)

X

X
(LOGO)NORWEST MORTGAGE                            Norwest Mortgage, Inc.
                                                  405 S.W. 5th Street
                                                  Des Moines, IA 50309-4626
                                                  515/237-6000


                              Management Assertion

As of and for the year ended December 3l, 1997,   Norwest  Mortgage  Banking has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  Uniform  Single  Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers.  As of this same period,  Norwest Mortgage Banking
had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and  omissions  policy in the amount of
$100 million and $20 million, respectively.


/s/Mark C. Oman                                                 Januiary 14,1998
Mark C. Oman                                                    Date
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

/s/Robert K. Chapman                                            Janaury 14, 1998
Robert K. Chapman                                               Date
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICE

/s/Mike Heid                                                    Janaury 14, 1998
Mike Heid                                                       Date
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT LOAN SERVICING