T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** * w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T WAR R E N E R I C AR MS T E AD , P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. R I C H A R D I V E S , W ar de n, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 11- 57047 D. C . No . 2 : 1 1 - c v - 0 6 1 8 9 - C AS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C hr i s t i naA . S ny de r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2012 *** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. F eder alpri soner W arre n E ri c A rm st ea d app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2241 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w the de ni a l of as e c t i on 2241 

# FI LED DE C 31 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 57047 2 p e titio n d e n o v o a n dth e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s f a c tu a l f in d in g s f o rc le are rr o r . See R e y nolds v . T

hom as , 6 0 3 F. 3 d1 1 4 4 , 1 1 4 8 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 1 0 ) . W e a f f i rm. A rm s t e a d c ont e nds tha thi s due pr oc e s s r i ght s w e r e vi ol a t e d i n the pr i s on d is c ip lin a ryp r o c e e d in g s f in d in g h im g u iltyo f

f a ilin g to p r o v id e au r in e s a m p le . T he r e c or d doe s nots upporthi s c ont e nt i on. B e c aus e A rm s t e a d r e c e i ve d a l l the p r o c e s s th a t w a s du e a n ds o m e e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e d is c ip lin aryf in d in g s , h e is n o t e n title dto r e lie f

. Se e Su p e r in te n de n t v . Hill , 47 2 U . S . 44 5, 45 5 (19 85 ); W o lff v . McD o n n e ll , 41 8 U . S . 53 9, 56 3-67 (197 4). A rm s te a da ls o a lle g e s th a t p r is o n o f f ic ia ls v io la te dh is F ir s t, F o u rth , E ig h th a n dF o u rte e n th A m e n d m e n t r ig h ts in c o n n e c tio n w ith th e u r in e s a m p le r e q u e s te d . T he approp ri at e r em edy f or these cl ai m s l i es i n a ci vi l ri gh t s a ct i on un der B i ve ns v. S ixU n kn o w n N

a m e d A g e n ts , 403 U . S . 388 ( 1971) , r a the rthan as e c t i on 2241 p e titio n . Se e T

uc ke rv . Car l

s on , 9 2 5 F .2 d3 3 0 , 3 3 2 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 1 ) ; see a l so H e rn a n dezv . Ca m

p b e ll , 204 F . 3d 861, 864 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( s e c t i on 2241 pe t i t i ons

“ chal l enge the m anner, l ocat i on , or cond i t i on s of ase nt ence ’ s e xecut i on ”) . W e de c l i ne t o c ons i de rA rm s t e a d’ s a r gum e nt , r a i s e d f orthe f i r s tt i m e on ap p e a l, c h a lle n g in g th e p r is o n ’s p o lic ie s r e g ar d in g u r in e s a m p le s . See P ad get t v. W r i ght , 58 7 F . 3d 98 3, 98 5 n . 2 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( per c uri am ). AF F I RME D.