alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of European Micro Holdings, Inc. (the
“ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.






Date:October
                10, 2007
            By:*/s/
                John B. Gallagher*
              
              Name:John
                B. GallagherTitle:Co-Chief Executive OfficerDate:October
                10, 2007
            By:*/s/
                Harry D. Shields*
              
              Name:Harry
                D. ShieldsTitle:Co-Chief Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to European Micro Holdings, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by European Micro Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3223 

AN ACT 

To provide for the compensation of furloughed Federal 

employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3223 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Ret3 roactive Pay Fairness Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FURLOUGHED FEDERAL EM5 PLOYEES. 

6 Federal employees furloughed as a result of any lapse 

7 in appropriations which begins on or about October 1, 

8 2013, shall be compensated at their standard rate of com9 pensation, for the period of such lapse in appropriations, 

10 as soon as practicable after such lapse in appropriations 

11 ends. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 5, 

2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3223 

AN ACT 

To provide for the compensation of furloughed 

Federal employees.
lAEROSeAC E 

Mark Provost 

Director, Engineering 

M7 Aerospace LP 

1082' ME Entrance Road 

San Anionio TK 7H216 

PC) Bc« 79U-19U 

San Antonio TX 7S:7M-n4nii 

Phone 210.824.9421 

Fax 2tOi?20Rb90 

M-5336 March 22, 2011 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington. DC 20590 

Subject: Exemption No. 5367J from 14 CFR (FAR Section) 91.531(a)(3), 

Expiration Date 03/31/2011 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

In accordance with FAR 11.25, M7 Aerospace requests a renewal of Exemption 

5637J, which expires on 3/31/2011. That exemption allows M7 Aerospace's type 

rated company pilots to conduct experimental, maintenance test and ferry flights in 

the SA227-CC and SA227-DC airplanes without a second in command (SIC). It also 

permits all operators of M7 Aerospace commuter category airplanes (SA227-CC, 

SA227-DC and other airplanes on the same type certificate) to conduct flight 

operations without a designated second-in-command pilot, provided the airplane is 

type certificated for single-pilot operations and the airplane is carrying nine or fewer 

passengers. 

Regulations affected: 

14 CFR 91.531(a)(3) requires two pilots for all large commuter category airplanes 

having a passenger seating configuration of ten or more seats, regardless of the 

passenger load or of FAA approval of the airplane for single-pilot operation. 

Relief sought: 

M7 Aerospace LP asks that exemption 5367J be renewed to continue to allow M7 

Aerospace's type rated company pilots to conduct experimental, maintenance test, 

and ferry flights in the SA227-CC and SA227-DC airplanes without a second in 

command (SIC); and to continue to permit all operators of M7 Aerospace commuter 

category airplanes (SA227-CC and SA227-DC and other airplanes on the same type 
certificate) to conduct flight operations without a designated second-in-command 

pilot, provided the airplane is type certificated for single-pilot operations and the 

airplane is carrying nine or fewer passengers. 

Justification: 

The justification detailed in exemption 5367J remains appropriate and ample. We 

believe that an extension of this exemption will continue to provide M7 Aerospace 

and our operators (meeting the requirements of this exemption) increased operating 

flexibility and reduced economic burdens. 

Public Interest: 

An amendment to this exemption will benefit the public by reducing the cost of flight 

test and ferrying aircraft and by reducing the cost of doing business, a cost that 

ultimately is passed on to the public. This exemption allows us to conduct all 

necessary flight operations in preparation for delivery of the airplane to the customer 

without a second-in-command. The absence of a second in command does not 

affect public safety, and reduces the final cost of maintenance of customer's aircraft. 

Federal Register Summary: 

Petitioner: M7 Aerospace 

Section of the FAR affected: 14CFR 91.531(a)(3) 

Description of Relief Sought To renew exemption 5367J. 

Yours truly, 

M7 Aerospace LP 

Provost 

Director, 

Engineering
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             266
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,614
<ALLOWANCES>                                       390
<INVENTORY>                                      2,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,830
<PP&E>                                          12,310
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,779
<BONDS>                                          1,268
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           136
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,319
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,425
<SALES>                                         20,695
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,230
<CGS>                                           11,508
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,016
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   342
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,569)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (494)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,075)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,075)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A1 44 1 . THE STATE v

. PAYNE.

Th i s cas e was d o ck et ed b y t h i s Co u rt o n May 1 4, 20 2 1

. Th e St at e’ s bri ef an d

en u m e r a t i o n o f erro rs were o ri g i n al l y d u e o n J u ne 3
, 2 0 2 1. As o f th e d at e o f t h i s

o rd er, t h e St at e has s t i l l no t fi l ed a bri ef an d en u m erat i o n o f erro rs

. T h e fi l i n g i s 2 2 1
d ay s l at e. A c c o r d i n g ly
, t h i s ap p eal is h ereb y d eem ed ab an d o n ed an d DISM ISSED

p u rs u an t t o Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru l e 2 3 (a). See al s o Co u rt o f Ap peal s Ru l e 1 3

. Th e Cl erk o f C o u r t i s D IRECTED t o s en d a co p y o f t h i s o rd er t o t h e St at e’ s
at t o rn ey i n t h i s cas e.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. January 10, 2022

01/10/2022
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             -----------------------
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             -----------------------
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                             ----------------------
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

      In connection with the Report of Integrated Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period from April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the period indicated. This
            Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
            Securities and Exchange Commission.


Dated: July 16, 2007                           /s/ Steven R. Blake
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Steven R. Blake
                                               Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7191

DAVID B. GRAY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00856-TSE-MSN)

Submitted: February 24, 2022 Decided: February 28, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David B. Gray, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David B. Gray seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for failure to pay the filing fee. The order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing 

of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court 

denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims

debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district 

court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of 

the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Gray’s informal brief, we

conclude that Gray has not made the requisite showing. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also 

Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important 

document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that 

brief.”). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Internet Security Systems, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of
the Corporation, certifies that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Corporation.



/s/ RICHARD MACCHIA
----------------------------------------------------------
Richard Macchia
Senior Vice President Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2004
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of *SOURCECORP*,Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that,to my knowledge:

 

The Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained inthe Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 9, 2005 | /s/ Ed H. Bowman, Jr.                                     |   |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   | Ed H. Bowman, Jr.

President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code).

 

----
#### Ex parte MARTINEZ.

No. 26038.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 15, 1952.

William C. McDonald, San Angelo, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

Appellant, having been arrested for murder and the District Court having refused to set bail, sued out a writ of habeas corpus before the District Judge of the 119th Judi*731cial District in order that he might be admitted to bail. At the hearing oí said writ, he was refused hail and remanded to custody. From that judgment he has appealed to this Court.

After a careful consideration of the record, it is our opinion that appellant is entitled to bail, and we have fixed the amount of 'his bail in the sum of $5,000. The judgment will be set aside, and the appellant will he admitted to bail and released from custody, upon the execution by him of a bond in the sum of $5,000, with good and sufficient sureties, conditioned as the law directs.

Ordered accordingly.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

130957 Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. TAMEKA BRANCHE, Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices Tommie Charles Tyson, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130957 COA: 266255 Wayne CC: 05-514262-NH SINAI-GRACE HOSPITAL, a/k/a SINAI HOSPITAL OF GREATER DETROIT, Defendant-Appellant,

and

DANIEL J. WALZ, M.D., Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Washington v Sinai Hosp ital of Greater Detroit (Docket No. 130641) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolv e an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.

l0918 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2006

Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of rate for use in Federal debt collection and discount evaluation.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Section 11 of the Debt Collection Act of 1982 (31 U.S.C. 3717), the Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for computing and publishing the percentage rate to be used in assessing interest charges for outstanding debts on claims owed the Government. Treasury's Cash Management Regulations (I TFM 6-8000) also prescribe use of this rate by agencies as a comparison point in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of a cash discount. Notice is hereby given that the applicable rate is 6 percent for calendar year 2001.

# DATES:

The rate will be in effect for the period beginning on January 1, 2001 and ending on December 31, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Inquiries should be directed to the Program Compliance Division, Financial Management Service, Department of the Treasury, 401 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20227 (Telephone: (202) 874-6630).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The rate reflects the current value of funds to the Treasury for use in connection with Federal Cash Management systems and                           ( print page 65041)                        is based on investment rates set for purposes of Pub. L. 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227. Computed each year by averaging investment rates for the 12-month period ending every September 30 for applicability effective January 1, the rate is subject to quarterly revisions if the annual average, on the moving basis, changes by 2 per centum. The rate in effect for calendar year 2001 reflects the average investment rates for the 12-month period that ended September 30, 2000.                

Dated: October 25, 2000.

Bettsy H. Lane,

Assistant Commissioner, Federal Finance.

[FR Doc. 00-27895  Filed 10-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
(LOGO)
                                     OCWEN

                 MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE WITH USAP

March 25, 1998

As of and for the year ended  December  31,  1997,  Ocwen  Federal Bank FSB (the
"Bank")  has  complied  in all  material  respects  with the  minimum  servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association  of America's  Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period,
the Bank had in effect a fidelity bond and an errors and omissions policy in the
combined amount of $10,000,000.


/s/Jay B. Goldman
Jay Goldman, Vice President


3/25/98
Date
TS-ACET10/20/30/40/50

Attachment #3

Pt. 1, Sec. B 

CAS Inventory Expert Service Reports and Chemical Structures of the New Chemical 

Substances 

The following pages give the CAS Inventory Expert Service (IES) Reports on the new 

chemical substances. The chemical structures of the compounds are also provided. 
INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN.

If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. 

Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA.

A	division	of	the	American	Chemical	Society	 Phone:	800-631-1884,	614-447-3870

Fax:	614-447-3747

E-mail: answers@cas.org

Web: www.cas.org/products/other-cas-products/client-services/

InventoryExpertService

CAS					•					2540	Olentangy	River	Road					•					P.O.	Box	3343					•					Columbus,	OH		43210-0334					•					USA

,(62UGHU1XPEHU

5HJLVWU\1XPEHU

&$,QGH[1DPH
INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN.

If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. 

Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA.

A	division	of	the	American	Chemical	Society	 Phone:	800-631-1884,	614-447-3870

Fax:	614-447-3747

E-mail: answers@cas.org

Web: www.cas.org/products/other-cas-products/client-services/

InventoryExpertService

CAS					•					2540	Olentangy	River	Road					•					P.O.	Box	3343					•					Columbus,	OH		43210-0334					•					USA

,(62UGHU1XPEHU

5HJLVWU\1XPEHU

&$,QGH[1DPH
PMN-5'