alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                 118
<SECURITIES>                                         1,184
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8,916
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5,048
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                              40,834
<DEPRECIATION>                                       9,839
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     338,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                            266,352
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            29,570
<OTHER-SE>                                          12,596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       338,756
<SALES>                                              6,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    19,442
<CGS>                                                5,498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        5,498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8,190
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1,086
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4,081
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        587
<INCOME-TAX>                                           162
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    425
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           425
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.08
        


</TABLE>
#### Lige BAILEY, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 12, 1954.

*808Napier & Napier, Hazard, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Zeb A. Stewart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant moved for an appeal from a judgment of the Perry Circuit Court convicting him of shooting and wounding in sudden affray, on an indictment charging him with malicious shooting and wounding with intent to kill, and fixing his punishment at a fine of $250 and confinement in jail for six months.

We find no merit in appellant’s contention that the court erred in overruling his motion for a directed verdict, or that .the verdict was against the law and the evidence and rendered as a result of passion and prejudice. The evidence is conflicting as to whether appellant fired the shot which wounded Geneva Young (often referred to in the record as Geneva Sizemore) or whether his brother-in-law, Clifton Baker, fired it. Clearly, this was a question for the jury and the evidence is amply sufficient to take the case to the jury and to sustain the verdict.

It was not erroneous for the Commonwealth Attorney to ask appellant on cross-examination if he had not previously been convicted of manslaughter. The record shows the court properly admonished the jury once that the purpose of the evidence of appellant’s previous conviction of a felony was to affect his credibility as a witness, if in fact it did so. We have held it proper to ask a witness of what felony he was convicted. White v. Com., 312 Ky. 543, 228 S.W.2d 426. Nor was it reversible error for the court not to admonish the jury that the purpose of other impeaching evidence went only to the credibility of the witness, where on the whole record such evidence was not prejudicial to accused. Allen v. Com., 302 Ky. 546, 195 S.W.2d 96.

Motion for an appeal denied and judgment affirmed.
# Summary Information

A. Applicant Information:

( Check all that apply)

X Not a

Consortium Interstate

Consortium Intrastate

Consortium

Community now receives EAS subsidy

X Community (or Consortium member) previously

received a Small Community Grant

If previous recipient, date of grant : June 26, 2002

E xpiration date of grant: March 12, 2005

Federal funds requested: $217,530

Carrier(s) service obtained: N/A

Destination(s) served: N/A

B. Public/Private Partnerships:

(List organization names)

Public Private

1. Santa Maria Public

Airport District 1. Santa Maria Valley Chamber

of Commerce & Visitor &

Convention Bureau

2

. Santa Maria Economic

Development Commission

C

. Project Proposal:

(C

heck all that apply)

X Marketing X Start

- up Cost Offset

Travel Bank X Secure Additional

Service

Surface Transportation X New Route

Launch New Carrier Subsidy

Study X Revenue Guarantee

Upgrade Aircraft First Service

Service Restoration Other ( explain

below ): Regional Service

D. Existing Landing Aids at Local Airport:

X Full ILS X Published Instrument Approach

X Localizer X Outer/Middle Marker

X Other (specify): VOR and GPS Approach es E. Project Cost:

Line Description Sub

Total Total

Amount

1 Federal amount requested $490,000

2 State cash financial

contribution $0

Local cash financial

contribution

3a Airport cash funds $45,000

3b Non

- airport cash funds $130,000

3 Total local cash funds

(3a+3b) $ 175 ,000

4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING

(1+2+3) $ 665 ,000

In

- Kind contribution

5a Airport In

- Kind

contributio n** $55,000

5b Other In

- Kind

contribution ** $10,000

5 TOTAL IN

- KIND

CONTRIBUTION (5a+5b) $ 6 5,000

6 TOTAL PROJECT COST (4+ 5 ) $ 730 ,000

F. In

- Kind Contributions :

For funds in lines 5a (Airport In

- Kind contribution) and 5b (Other In

- Kind

contribution), please describe the source(s) of fund(s) for each.

5a Airport In

- Kind contribution: Fee waivers

5b Other In

- Kind contribution: Marketing

G. Is this application subject to review by State

under Executive Order 12372 process?

a. This application was made available to the State

under the Executive Order 12372. Process for

review on (date) _____________.

b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372, but has not

been selected by the State for review.

c. Prog ram is not covered by E.O. 12372.

H. Is the Applicant delinquent on any Federal

debt? (if “yes”, provide explanation)

No

Yes (explain ) X

X
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TERRA NOVA
(BERMUDA) HOLDINGS LTD. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          1,134,469
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                 0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                   0
<EQUITIES>                                       72,845
<MORTGAGE>                                            0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                         0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                1,207,314
<CASH>                                           84,891
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               78,575
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           80,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2,454,392
<POLICY-LOSSES>                               1,412,712
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             432,864
<POLICY-OTHER>                                        0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                 0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 175,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        232,012
<OTHER-SE>                                       57,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2,454,392
<PREMIUMS>                                      456,994
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              64,409
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                7,676
<OTHER-INCOME>                                        0
<BENEFITS>                                      416,218
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     184,532
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             17,423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (122,681)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (30,316)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (92,365)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (92,365)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                1,063,485
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             371,503
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                44,715<F2>
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               59,830
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                398,937<F1>
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                               1,020,936
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                               0

<FN>
<F1> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MOVEMENT DURING THE YEAR HAS BEEN ALLOCATED TO PRIOR YEAR
PAID CLAIMS.
<F2> PRIOR AMOUNTS HAVE BEEN RESTATED FROM THE SECOND QUARTER OF 2000.
</FN>

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6201-6202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2787]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP98-104-004]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Pooling 
Report

February 2, 2000.
    Take notice that on January 24, 2000, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), filed a Report of Pooling Activity 
pursuant to a Letter Order dated January 7, 1999 regarding the above-
captioned proceeding.

[[Page 6202]]

    Williston Basin stated that it is complying with the Letter Order 
by submitting its report of pooling and nomination aggregation activity 
for the first year of pooling service.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before February 9, 2000. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be 
viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-
208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-2787 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3223 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 208
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3223

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 5, 2013

                     Received; read the first time

                            October 7, 2013

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To provide for the compensation of furloughed Federal employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Employee Retroactive Pay 
Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FURLOUGHED FEDERAL EMPLOYEES.

    Federal employees furloughed as a result of any lapse in 
appropriations which begins on or about October 1, 2013, shall be 
compensated at their standard rate of compensation, for the period of 
such lapse in appropriations, as soon as practicable after such lapse 
in appropriations ends.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 5, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 208

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3223

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To provide for the compensation of furloughed Federal employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 7, 2013

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Molecular Target Drug Discovery For Cancer.                    

*Date:*                         November 29, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8 am to 5 pm                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Double Tree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lalita D. Palekar, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Special Review, Referral and Resources Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8066, Bethesda, MD 20892-7405, (301) 496-7575.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research' 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 19, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-27880  Filed 10-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Synnott B. Durham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sunair Electronics, Inc.;
1. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thereport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
3. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) forthe registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
DATE: February 14, 2005        /s/ Synnott B. Durham   Synnott B. Durham   Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-11-00307- CV
In re Mar k David S im m ons ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM H AY S CO UNTY M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Henson a nd Goodwin Filed: May

24, 2011
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Internet Security Systems, Inc. listed below of our reports dated March 15,
2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Internet Security Systems, Inc., Internet Security Systems, Inc. management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Internet
Security Systems, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2004:

     Registration Statement No. 333-54670 on Form S-8 (1995 Stock Incentive Plan
     (Amended and Restated as of May 24, 2000), 1999 Employee Stock Purchase
     Plan, 1999 International Stock Purchase Plan)

     Registration Statement No. 333-53279 on Form S-8 (ISS Group, Inc. Restated
     1995 Stock Incentive Plan)

     Registration Statement No. 333-89563 on Form S-8 (ISS Group, Inc. 1995
     Stock Incentive Plan, 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1999 International
     Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Netrex, Inc. 1998 Stock Plan)

     Registration Statement No. 333-62658 on Form S-8 (1999 Network ICE Stock
     Option Plan, Restated 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated
     through May 23, 2001))

     Registration Statement No. 333-100954 on Form S-8 (vCIS, Inc. 2001 Stock
     Plan, Internet Security Systems, Inc. Restated 1995 Stock Incentive Plan
     (as amended and restated as of May 29, 2001), Internet Security Systems,
     Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Internet Security Systems, Inc.
     1999 International Stock Purchase Plan)


                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 15, 2005
#### LARKIN v. STATE.

No. 23811.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 19, 1947.

*773No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of unlawfully passing a forged instrument and assessed a penalty of five years in the penitentiary.

The record, as brought forward, contains neither bills of exception nor a statement of facts. The proceedings appear regular and nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.