alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 12-50823 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ANTOINE EARL POWELL, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:05-CR-219-1

Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ant o i ne Earl Powell, federal prisoner # 56375-180, pleaded guilty t o ai di n g and abetting the possession with intent to distribute at least 50 grams of crack cocaine (count one) and aiding and abetting the possession of a firearm during the commission of a drug-trafficking crime (count two). He was sentenced to 151 months on count one, to run consecutively to a 60-month sentence on count two. P o w e l l ’ s s e n tence was subsequently reduced, pursuant 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c) , t o th e statutory minimum of 10 years in prison. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Janu ary18 , 20 13 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 12-50823 Document: 00512117868 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/18/2013No. 12-50823

Powell now seeks leave to proceed in form a p a u p e ris (IFP) on appeal to challenge the denial o f h is motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to § 3582(c). By so moving, Powell challenges the district court’s certification that his appeal was not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 & n.24 (5th Cir. 1997). Powell contends that the provisions of the Fair Sentencing Ac t (FSA), which amended t h e amounts of crack needed to trigger statutory minimum sentences , s h o uld apply to him. Powell’s argument fail. The district court lacked authority to reduce his sentence below the statutory minimum sentence of 10 years. See United S t a t e s v. Carter , 595 F.3d 575, 578-81 (5th Cir. 2010). His argument that he is entitled to a reduction in light o f the FSA is without merit. Cf. Dorsey v. United States , 132 S. Ct. 2321, 2335-36 (2012) (“[I]n federal sentencing the ordinary practice is to apply new penalties to defendants not yet sentenced.”). Powell has failed to demonstrate a nonf r i v o l ous issue for appeal. Accordingly, his motion for leave to proceed IFP is denied, and t h e appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2. IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

2 Case: 12-50823 Document: 00512117868 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/18/2013
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS







I,
Brian Chaiken, Chief Financial Officer of Z Trim Holdings, Inc., an Illinois
corporation (the "Registrant"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
the Report on Form 10-K for the period of the Registrant from January 1, 2009
through December 31, 2009 (the "Report") which this statement
accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:  April
9, 2010


By                 /s/ Brian
Chaiken


Brian Chaiken


Chief Financial Officer








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 42810/42811/42812/42813/42814

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

JEREMY ORVILLE JOHNSON ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 520

Filed: May 5, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bonneville County. Hon. Joel E. Tingey , District Judge.

Orders denying I.C.R. 35 motions for reduction of sentence s , affirmed

. Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Jud ge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM In docket number 42810, Jeremy Orville Johnson pled guilty to injury to jail, Idaho Code
§ 18

- 718, and the district court imposed a unified sentence of three years with one year
determinate, suspended the sentence

, and placed Johnson on supervised probation. In docket
number 42811, Johnson pled guilty to possession of methamphetamine, I.C. § 37

- 2732(c)(1) , and the district court imposed a concurrent unified sentence of seven years with two years
determinate, suspen ded the sentence, and placed Johnson on supervised probation. After
Johnson violated his probation, the district court continued his supervised probation.
Subsequently, Johnson again violated his probation and the district court revoked his probation2

and ordered his underlying sentences executed

. Johnson filed Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motions
for reduction of his sentences and both motions were denied by the district court.
In docket numbers 42812, 42813, and 42814, Johnson pled guilty to one count of

deli very of methamphetamine in each case. The district court sentenced Johnson to concurrent
unified sentences of twenty

- five years with eight years determinate. Johnson filed I.C.R

. 35

motion s for the reduction of his sentences , which the district court den ied. Johnson appeals
asserting that the district court abused its discretion by denying his Rule 35 motions

. A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. K nighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d
23, 24 (2006); State v. Gill , 150 Idaho 183, 186, 244 P.3d 1269, 1272 (Ct. App. 2010). In
presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of

new or additional information s ubsequently provided to the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the record, including any new information submitted with Johnson’ s Rule 35 motion s , we conclude

no abuse o f discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order s denying Johnson ’s

Rule 35 motion s are affirmed.
SERVED JULY 6, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

LIBERTY FOUNDATION, INC. 

FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. F AA-2012-0477 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

... q 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 201IGL030070) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be seryed on the Judge, the FAA Hearing bocket, and the other 

.. 

Attachment - Service List 

Cj: 3 3 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Stuart A. Goldstein, Respondent's Counsel 

Stuart A. Goldstein, P .A. 

9350 South Dixie Highway, 1oth Floor 

Miami, FL 33156 

TEL: 305-670-1222 

FAX: 305-670-7065 

Adrianne Wojcik, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 

TEL: 847-294-7109 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 ,, 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0477 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

'• 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63843-63844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27598]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, November 3, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

[[Page 63844]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-27598 Filed 10-23-00; 4:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2



The Board of Directors
Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-76229) of Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd. of our
report dated March 5, 2004 with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of
Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss,
changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
two-year period ended December 31, 2003 and the accompanying financial statement
schedule as of December 31, 2003 and for each of the years in the two-year
period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2004
Form 10-K of Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd.

Our report contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 have been prepared assuming that the Company will
continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company has suffered significant losses from
operations and experienced liquidity demands that raise substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans with regard to
these matters are also described in Note 3. The consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


KPMG




Chartered Accountants
Hamilton, Bermuda
March 31, 2005
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 01, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 01, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0203. RACHEL LOWE v. ROY WILLARD.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2020CV0469
(LOGO)
                                                             HUNTINGTON MORTGAGE
                                                             COMPANY

                                             The Huntington Mortgage Company
                                             7575 Huntington Park Drive
                                             Columbus, Ohio 43235

March 26, 1998

SASCOR
Attn: Master Servicing Dept
7435 New Technology Way
Frederick, MD 21701

Re: 1997 Annual Reporting

Dear Investor:

In  accordance  with the servicing  agreement  between The  Huntington  Mortgage
Company (HMC) and your firm, this letter will serve as our annual  certification
relative  to the  portfolio  of  mortgage  loans  administered  on your  behalf.
Enclosed,  please find The  Huntington  BancShares  Incorporated  and HMC Annual
Reports for 1997.

This letter will also certify that all real estate taxes and insurance  premiums
have been paid in  connection  with the mortgage loan  portfolio.  Additionally,
please find Fidelity Bond certificates as well as Errors Omissions declarations
to further protect your interest.

The employees of The  Huntington are pleased to be of service to you and we look
forward to continuing the valued business  relationship that we have established
with your  organization.  Should you have any questions  regarding the enclosed
statements, please contact me directly at (614)480-6680.

Sincerely,
/s/Bradford C. Northcraft
Bradford C. Northcraft
Vice President
Investor Services Manager




     Take control of your money.
800 Independence Ave., S.W.

Washington, DC 20591

AFS

- 12

- 029

- P November 7, 2012

Mr. Matt Scrib n er

Vice President of Operations

Inogen, Inc.

326 Bollay Drive

Goleta, CA 93117

Dear Mr. Scrib n er :

In your October 12, 2011, letter

, you petition ed the Federal Aviation Administration

( FAA) to amend Special Feder al Aviation Regulation 106 , Section 2 and Section 3(a) of

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR) . This amend ment would include the

Inogen , Inc., One G3 Portable Oxygen Concentrator (POC) as an approved POC for on

board aircraft.

The FAA amended SFAR 106 on October 16, 2012 ( 77 FR 63217 ) to add the following

POC devices that may be carried on and used by a passenger on board an aircraft :

• AirSep Focus

• AirSep Freestyle 5

• Inogen One G3

• Inova Labs LifeChoice Activox

• Respironics Simply Go

• Precision M edical EasyPulse

• SeQual SAROS

Therefore, we will take no further action on this petiti on and Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 1138

is being closed

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Ida M. Klepper

Manager, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### STRICKLAND v. STATE.

No. 26895.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 14, 1954.

W. S. Foster, Waco, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The punishment assessed is a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The transcript in this cause reflects that the term of court at which the case was tried adjourned on December 26, 1953; that notice of appeal was given and entered of record on the same day; and that a recognizance was entered into on January. 12, 1954. Such recognizance entered into after the adjournment of the term of Court at which the conviction was had was invalid and requires a dismissal of the appeal. See Hudson v. State, 155 Tex.Cr.R. 485, 237 S.W.2d 302. Under the provisions of Article 830, C.C.P., the accused could not enter into a recognizance after the adjournment of the trial term of court, but should have given a bail bond pending appeal.

Because of the absence of a proper appeal bond, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. It is therefore dismissed.
i

ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL

FURNACES AND BOILERS

TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT (Documents List):

Title Page

Table of Contents List

Table of Contents

CHAPTERS

=========

Chapter 1: Introduction

Chapter 2: Analytic Framework

Chapter 3: Market and Technology Assessment

Chapter 4: Screening Analysis

Chapter 5: Markups for Equipment Price Determination

Chapter 6: Engineering Analysis

Chapter 7: Energy Consumption of Furnaces and Boilers

Chapter 8: Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis

Chapter 9: Shipments

Chapter 10: National Energy Savings and Consumer Impacts

Chapter 11: Life-Cycle Cost Sub-Group Analysis

Chapter 12: Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Chapter 13: Utility Impact Analysis

Chapter 14: Net National Employment Impact Analysis

Environmental Assessment

Regulatory Impact Analysis

APPENDIXES

==========

Appendix 5.1: Detailed Data for Equipment Price Markups

Appendix 6.1: Technical Description of the Reverse Engineering Cost Estimation

Methodology

Appendix 6.2: Installation Cost Model

Appendix 6.3: Determination of Furnace and Boiler Energy Use

Appendix 6.4: Engineering Analysis Cost and Efficiency Tables

Appendix 7.1: Reduced Set of Furnace Models Database

Appendix 7.2: Decoding of Manufacturer Model Numbers

Appendix 7.3: Determination of Basic Furnace Models

Appendix 7.4: Furnace Fan Curves

Appendix 7.5: Blower Fan Curves

Appendix 7.6: Overall Air-Moving Efficiency

Appendix 7.7: Gas and Electricity Use for Modulating Furnaces

Appendix 8.1: Glossary of Variables and Their Values From EIA's RECS97
ii

Appendix 8.2: Distribution Discount Rates

Appendix 8.3: LCC and PBP Results Using Alternative Installation Cost Scenarios

Appendix 8.4: LCC and PBP Results Using Alternative Energy Price Scenarios

Appendix 8.5: Analysis of Electricity Efficiency Design Options for Furnaces and

Boilers

Appendix 8.6: Furnace Airflow Capacity Testing

Appendix 8.7: Power Consumption of ECM Blower Motors

Appendix 8.8: Power Consumption of BC/ECM+ Blower Motors

Appendix 8.9: Air Conditioner Operating Hours

Appendix 10.1: National Energy Savings and Net Present Value Using Alternative

Installation Costs and Energy Price Scenarios

Acronyms and Abbreviations
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3028 

To amend the hold harmless provision for career and technical education 

assistance grants to States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2013 

Mr. HECK of Nevada (for himself and Mr. GRIJALVA) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the hold harmless provision for career and 

technical education assistance grants to States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Career and Technical 

5 Education Equity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HOLD HARMLESS. 

7 Section 111(a)(5)(A) of the Carl D. Perkins Career 

8 and Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 

9 2321(a)(5)(A)) is amended to read as follows: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3028 IH

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—No State shall receive 

2 an allotment under this section for a fiscal year 

3 that is less than 90 percent of the allotment the 

4 State received under this section for the pre5 ceding fiscal year.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winfield Capital
Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul A.
Perlin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  November 11, 2004           By: /s/ PAUL A. PERLIN
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Paul A. Perlin
                                        Chief Executive Officer & Director


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                         811,031
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,553,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,500
<INVENTORY>                                  2,308,017
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,666,750
<PP&E>                                       5,384,613
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,804,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,912,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,088,729
<BONDS>                                      1,211,870
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           67,832
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,912,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,912,532
<SALES>                                      7,431,336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,431,336
<CGS>                                        4,729,463
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,758,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (30,604)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                506,610
<INCOME-TAX>                                   150,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            356,610
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,042)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   355,568
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .131
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .126
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2816 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2816

 To extend the pilot program under section 258 of the National Housing 
  Act that establishes an automated process for providing alternative 
  credit rating information for mortgagors and prospective mortgagors 
                        under certain mortgages.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2013

Mr. Al Green of Texas (for himself, Ms. Chu, Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. Danny K. 
Davis of Illinois, Mr. Carson of Indiana, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Perlmutter, 
and Ms. Moore) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the pilot program under section 258 of the National Housing 
  Act that establishes an automated process for providing alternative 
  credit rating information for mortgagors and prospective mortgagors 
                        under certain mortgages.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FHA Alternative Credit Pilot Program 
Reauthorization Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM.

    Section 258(d) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z-24(d)) 
is amended by striking ``5-year'' and inserting ``10-year''.
                                 <all>
```