alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 19, 2017

NO. 03-16-00259-CV

James Boone, Appellant

v.

David Gutierrez, Chairman, 

Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED—OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on April 4, 2016. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the judgment. Because appellant is indigent and 

unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-24-0000568

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

GYM BIRTHDAYSUIT, III, a.k.a. JAMES PAUL CALZETTA,

Petitioner-Appellant, v. JEROME D. ADARNA, Respondent-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

HONOLULU DIVISION (CIVIL NO. 1DSS-24-0000979)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and McCullen, JJ.) Upon consideration of the document filed on September 30, 2024 by self-represented Petitioner-Appellant Gym Birthdaysuit, III, a.k.a. James Paul Calzetta ( Appellant ), which the court construes as a Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP ) Rule 42(a) motion for dismissal of the appeal before it is docketed and request for refund of the filing fees, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted as follows:

1. The appeal is dismissed; 2. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, Appellant shall contact the Supreme Court Clerk to provide any information necessary to process the refund of his filing fee for the appeal; 3. Within twenty-one (21) days of this order, the Supreme Court Clerk shall refund Appellant's filing fee paid for the appeal, in accordance with the information provided by Appellant; Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-24-0000568 03-OCT-2024 08:12 AM Dkt. 15 OGMDNOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

4. If Appellant did not intend to request dismissal of the appeal, he may seek reconsideration of this order in accordance with HRAP Rule 40. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order shall be served on the clerk of the District Court of the First Circuit. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, October 3, 2024. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge

2
ACCEPTED 12-14-00369-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 8/13/2015 2:02:29 PM CATHY LUSK CLERK
Third Amendment to Savings Investment Plan



 Exhibit 10.20(c) 
  
 CABOT OIL & GAS CORPORATION 
 SAVINGS INVESTMENT PLAN 
  
 (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2001) 
  
 Third Amendment 
  
 Cabot Oil & Gas
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), having established the Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation Savings Investment Plan, as amended and restated January 1, 2001 and as thereafter amended (the “Plan”), and
having reserved the right under Section 10.4 thereof to amend the Plan, does hereby amend the Plan, effective as of January 1, 2005, as follows: 
  
 1. Section 4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the phrase “twenty-five percent (25%)” as it appears in Section 4.1 and
replacing each such occurrence with the phrase “fifty percent (50%).” 
  
 2. The fourth paragraph of Section 8.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by inserting the following as a new third sentence: 
  

“Notwithstanding the above, in the event of a distribution referenced above which is greater than $1,000 but less than $5,000, if the Member does
not elect to have such distribution paid directly to an eligible retirement plan specified by the Member in a direct rollover, or to receive the distribution directly in accordance with the provisions stated elsewhere herein, then the Plan
Administrator will pay the distribution in a direct rollover to an individual retirement plan or account designated by the Plan Administrator in its sole discretion.” 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer this
     day of                      2005, but effective as specified herein. 
  

			
	CABOT OIL & GAS CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	  


	Name:	 	  


	Title:	 	  




  

 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                             610
<SECURITIES>                                    80,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  212,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     82,718
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               420,370
<PP&E>                                         409,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,140,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,437,127
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       119,706
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,416,763)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,140,070
<SALES>                                      3,144,490
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,144,490
<CGS>                                          364,940
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,252,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (176,050)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (176,050)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (176,050)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
| 1. | I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Shire plc; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this amendment no. 1 to the quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Angus Russell Angus RussellChief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 210 (Monday, October 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27782]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3304]


State of Michigan

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 
October 17, 2000, I find that Wayne County, Michigan constitutes a 
disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and flooding that 
occurred September 10-11, 2000. Applications for loans for physical 
damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of 
business on December 16, 2000 and for economic injury until the close 
of business on July 17, 2001, at the address listed below or other 
locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, 
Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 
30308.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the contiguous counties of Macomb, Monroe, 
Oakland, and Washtenaw in the State of Michigan may be filed until the 
specified date at the above location.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
    Homeowners with credit available elsewhere...............      7.375
    Homeowners without credit available elsewhere............      3.687
    Businesses with credit available elsewhere...............      8.000
    Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit         4.000
     available elsewhere.....................................
    Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit        6.750
     available elsewhere.....................................
For Economic Injury:
    Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without         4.000
     credit available elsewhere..............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The numbers assigned to this disaster are 330406 for physical 
damage and 9J3400 for economic injury.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)


    Dated: October 20, 2000.
Allan I. Hoberman,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-27782 Filed 10-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-2488

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Darryl Tucker

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

 ____________

 Submitted: February 25, 2019

Filed: February 28, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Darryl Tucker appeals the district court’s order committing himto the custody

1

of the Attorney General for hospitalization after finding that he was suffering from

a mental disease or defect such that his release would create a substantial risk of

bodily injury to another person or serious damage to the property of another. See 18

U.S.C. § 4246. 

Upon reviewing for clear error the factual determinations underlying the

district court’s commitment decision, we affirm. See United States v. Williams, 299

F.3d 673, 676-78 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review). The commitment order is

supported by medical opinions set forth in reports prepared by mental health

professionals where Tucker is presently confined for treatment, and by defense

counsel’s independent psychological examiner. The reports noted that Tucker suffers

from a mental illness which causes him to pose a danger to others, has difficulty

controlling the symptoms of that illness even within a monitored prison environment,

lacks insight into his medical condition, and likely would not adhere to treatment if

released. See United States v. Ecker, 30 F.3d 966, 970 (8th Cir. 1994) (factors in

determining potential dangerousness). We note that the Attorney General is under

a continuing obligation to exert reasonable efforts to place Tucker in a suitable state

facility, and that his custodians must prepare annual reports concerning his mental

condition and the need for continued commitment. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 4246(d) and

4247(e)(1)(B).

The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________

The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of

Missouri.

-2-
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor
Trust  Series A (the Fund), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Funds Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer  
|Kenneth A. Shewer      
|Chief Executive Officer
|September 16, 2005
#### TAYLOR v. STATE.

No. 25368.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 10, 1951.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 14, 1951.

*583Bennett & Bennett, by Mac L. Bennett, Jr., Normangee, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

On the original submission we reversed the conviction and ordered the prosecution dismissed because we thought we had detected a fatal defect in the information. This was based upon the absence of an allegation therein that the clerk of the District Court of Leon County had published the judgment of said court in a prohibition election contest case which determined the dry status of the area involved.

This holding was predicated upon numerous authorities holding the act of publication by the Commissioners’ Court of the results of a prohibition election to be a requisite allegation in an information charging liquor law violations.

Our attention is now called to Bickers v. Lacy, Tex.Civ.App., 134 S.W. 763, and Brooks v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 526, 137 S.W.2d 768, which both hold that the judgment of a district court in a prohibition election contest is itself notice to the world, and further call attention to the fact that there is no statutory requirement that the same be published.

Finding ourselves in error in the original opinion the same is now withdrawn. The State’s motion for rehearing is granted, and the judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant contends that the case of Adams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 241 S.W.2d 150, is here controlling and that his cause should be reversed because the trial court certifies in the bills of exception herein that such court was in error.

In the Adams case, we find laid down the proposition that although there may be a certification of error by the trial court in a bill of exception, nevertheless, such being a mere conclusion upon the part of the trial court, this court will look to the whole record, and if therein be found a contradiction of such certification, such could be utilized in a disposition of the matter.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
exv10w60



 






Exhibit 10.60




2006 Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers




	 	 	 	 	 
	Name and Title	 	Salary	 
	James H. Sabry
	 	 	 	 
	Chief Executive Officer
	 	$	435,000	 
	Robert I. Blum
	 	 	 	 
	President
	 	$	350,000	 
	Andrew A. Wolff
	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President, Clinical Research and Development and Chief Medical Officer
	 	$	340,000	 
	Sharon A. Surrey-Barbari
	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
	 	$	320,000	 
	David J. Morgans, Jr.
	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President, Pre-Clinical Research and Development
	 	$	300,000	 







5
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 209 (Friday, October 27, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 64402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27656]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CT-25-7223b; A-1-FRL-6891-7]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Connecticut; Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan 
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of Connecticut pursuant to the 
Clean Air Act. This revision establishes and requires implementation of 
an enhanced motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program. In the 
Final Rules Section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the 
State's SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal 
because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and 
anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval 
is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are 
received in response to this action rule, no further activity is 
contemplated. If EPA receives relevant adverse comments, the direct 
final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be 
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA 
will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in 
commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that 
if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section 
of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of 
the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are 
not the subject of an adverse comment.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 27, 
2000.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to David Conroy, Unit Manager, Air 
Quality Planning , Office of Ecosystem Protection (mail code CAQ), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA--New England, One Congress Street, 
Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02114-2023. Copies of the State submittal and 
EPA's technical support document are available for public inspection 
during normal business hours, by appointment at the Office of Ecosystem 
Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA--New England, One 
Congress Street, 11th floor, Boston, MA and the Bureau of Air 
Management, Department of Environmental Protection, State Office 
Building, 79 Elm Street, Hartford, CT 06106-1630.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Hagerty, (617) 918-1049.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, see the direct 
final rule which is located in the Rules Section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: October 19, 2000.
Mindy S. Lubber,
Regional Administrator, EPA--New England.
[FR Doc. 00-27656 Filed 10-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<TABLE>
                        LIBERTY FINANCIAL COMPANIES, INC.

           EXHIBIT 11 - Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings
               (in millions, except share and per share amounts)

<CAPTION>
                                   Three Months Ended      Six Months Ended
                                        June 30                June 30
                                  ------------------      ----------------
                                   1997        1996         1997        1996
                                   ----        ----         ----        ----
                                 
<S>                             <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>  
Primary net income per common share:
     
 Net income                     $     30.0  $     23.1   $     65.0  $     46.9
 Less:  cumulative preferred         
  dividends                            0.3         0.3          0.5         0.5
                                ----------  ----------   ----------  ---------- 
   Net income available for       
    common shareholders         $     29.7   $    22.8   $     64.5  $     46.4
                                ==========   =========   ==========  ==========


 Weighted average shares         
  outstanding                   28,952,759  28,159,518   28,864,767  27,970,547
 Common stock equivalents        1,678,125   1,451,876    1,700,036   1,466,353
                                ----------  ----------   ----------  ----------
     Total                      30,630,884  29,611,394   30,564,803  29,436,900
                                ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========


 Primary net income per common
  share                         $     0.97  $     0.77   $     2.11  $     1.58
                                ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========


Fully diluted net income per common share:

  Net income                    $     30.0   $    23.1   $     65.0  $     46.9
                                ==========   =========   ==========  ==========

  Weighted average shares         
   outstanding                  28,952,759  28,159,518   28,864,767  27,970,547
  Common stock equivalents       1,869,455   1,513,687    1,896,456   1,546,353
  Convertible preferred stock      345,341     346,060      345,488     346,060
                                ----------  ----------   ----------  ----------
     Total                      31,167,555  30,019,265   31,106,711  29,862,960
                                ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========

Fully diluted net income per  
 common share                   $     0.96  $     0.77   $     2.09  $     1.57
                                ==========  ==========   ==========  ==========
</TABLE>