alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp
                                CFO Certification                   Exhibit 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Tel-Instrument  Electronics
Corp. (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Joseph P. Macaluso,  Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge and based on my review of the Report:

      3.    the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      4.    the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

                                                By: /s/  Joseph P. Macaluso
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    /s/  Joseph P. Macaluso
                                                    Principal Accounting Officer

                                                    November 12, 2004

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Tel-Instrument  Electronics  Corp  and will be  retained  by
Tel-Instrument  Electronics  Corp and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      -17-
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64236-64237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27533]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Enterprise Computer Telephony Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 2, 2000, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Enterprise Computer Telephony 
Forum (``ECTF'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the 
purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Telesoft Technologies, Inc., Dorset, England, UNITED 
KINGDOM; Tenovis GmbH & Co. KG, Frankfurt, GERMANY; Call Sciences, 
Inc., Edison, NJ; Connect-It Communication B.V., Weert, THE 
NETHERLANDS; Elbit Systems Ltd., Haifa, ISRAEL; and Netergy Networks, 
Inc., Santa Clara, CA have been added as parties to this venture. Also, 
Telesoft Design, Ltd., Dorset, England, UNITED KINGDOM; Bosch Telecom 
GmbH, Frankfurt, GERMANY 8x8, Inc., Santa Clara, CA; and NetPhone, 
Marlborough, MA, have been dropped as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and ECTF intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On February 20, 1996, ECTF filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on 
May 13, 1996 (61 FR 22074).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 12, 
2000. A

[[Page 64237]]

notice for this filing has not yet been published in the Federal 
Register.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-27533 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Yearly Certificateholders' Statement (K)

                 CAPITOL REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1997-1

     Under  subsection  5.3 of the Pooling and Servicing  Agreement  dated as of
     November 1, 1997 by and  between  Chevy  Chase  Bank,  F.S.B.,  a federally
     chartered  savings bank, as Transferor  and Servicer,  and US Bank National
     Assoc.,  as Trustee and Custodial Agent  (hereinafter as such agreement may
     have been, or may from time to time be, amended,  supplemented or otherwise
     modified, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement"),  Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.,
     as the  Servicer,  is required to prepare  certain  information  each month
     regarding current  distributions on the Certificates and the performance of
     the Capitol  Revolving  Home Equity Loan Trust 1997-1 (the "Trust")  during
     the  related  Collection  Period.  The  information  that is required to be
     prepared   with   respect   to   the    distribution    to   Holders   (the
     "Certificateholders")  of the  Certificates  for the  calendar  year  ended
     December  31,  2001 is set  forth  below.  Certain  of the  information  is
     presented  on the basis of an  original  principal  amount  of  $1,000  per
     Certificate,  as the case may be.  Capitalized terms used and not otherwise
     defined herein have the meanings assigned them in the Pooling and Servicing
     Agreement.

A.   Information Regarding the Current Year Distribution to Certificateholders
     (Per $1,000 Original Principal Amount of a Certificate).


     1.   The amount, if any, of principal included in
          such distribution, separately stating the
          components thereof (including the portion
          thereof attributable to collections in respect of
          the Mortgage Loans)...............................     $105.80

     2.   The amount of Investor Certificate Interest  included in
            such distribution, the related Investor Certificate
            Rate and the portion
          thereof attributable to collections in
          respect of the Mortgage Loans.....................     $13.9015





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Certificate
to be duly executed this 20th day of March, 2002

                              CHEVY CHASE BANK, F.S.B.
                              as Servicer



                                  By:   Mark A. Holles
                                        ------------------
                                        Mark A. Holles
                                        Group Vice President
To: Dianne Nielson <dnielson@utah.gov>, Richard Sprott 

<RS PROn@utah.gov> 

" (j.';;; Richard Long 

11 /18/0304:00 PM cc: Kerry Clough/RAlR8/USEPA/US@EPA, (bee: Jonah 

Staller/RC/R8/USEPAlUS)

',3J .' 

Subject: EPA comments on Utah's Commitment/Action Table 

Dianne and Rick, 

Attached is the table of commitments and action items you developed following our last call on 

October 16. We added our own comments as well as new columns that cover any comments, 

agreements, and disagreements that we wanted captured. We wanted to get it to you this week so 

yOLl have a chance to review it before our call next week. 

Note, Kerry has been out of the office and has not seen this, so he may have some changes as 

well. 

Dick 

EPAs_Cmts_Whodoeswhatwhenpm 10.(
#### QUIRK v. STATE.

No. 24758.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 10, 1950.

*812Chas. H. Dean, Plainview, for appellant.

Enos T. Jones, County Attorney, Floy-dada, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant' was convicted of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry area and fined $150.00 and given six months in jail; and also on the same information, he was convicted of the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor in such area and fined the sum of $150.00 and given a six-months’ jail sentence.

The testimony shows that on October 15, 1949, Bill Money, an Inspector for the Texas Liquor Control Board, was in Floydada in Floyd County. He went to a taxi stand and contacted appellant. In their conversation he told appellant that he wanted to get another pint of whisky. Appellant told Money that he was out right at that time but there would be a load in within a few minutes, if he would come back. The Inspector left but returned and waited at the stand. After awhile appellant came up in a taxi, went over to a new Plymouth car, and began to put some number plates thereon. The Inspector told appellant that he wanted some whisky, and he and another man then got into the car. Appellant drove west about two blocks and turned, and then reached in his shirt and got a pint of whisky for which the Inspector paid him $5.00. This transaction occurred on a public street in Floydada.

This is all the testimony save proof that Floyd County was a dry area as shown by the election and orders of the Commissioners’ Court.

Bills Nos. 1 and 2 are based upon the same proposition: this is, that when the Liquor Board employee was placed on the stand, he was asked “for what purpose” he came to Floyd County. His answer was that the sheriff of that county had asked him to try to catch some bootleggers. Bill No. 2 is also directed to a statement made by the County Attorney upon the objection of appellant’s attorney that “it is our intention to try to bear that put.” In view of the evidence, we do not see how either of these statements could harm any one. According to the testimony, with no denial thereof, it looks like the Inspector caught a bootlegger, and the State’s intention relative to such is borne out.

One further bill of exception relates to the conversation allegedly had with appellant wherein the Inspector testified that he told appellant that he wanted to get “another pint of whisky.” It is insisted that such a statement is an effort to show another and different offense than the ones herein complained of. While it may be true that such statement could be taken as an inference that the witness had purchased a further pint of whisky from appellant, still we think such statement was part of the res gestae of this transaction, and as such it would be admissible.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.
EXHIBIT 11.1

                                INTERCARDIA, INC.

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                      (In thousands, except per share data)


                                                  Three Months Ended
                                                      December 31,
                                                 --------------------
                                                   1998       1997
                                                 ---------  ---------
Net loss per Unaudited Consolidated
   Statements of Operations                       $(6,121)   $(2,986)
                                                 =========  =========
Weighted average of common shares
   and common share equivalents outstanding
   - basic and diluted                              7,297      6,998
                                                 =========  =========
Net loss per common share:
  - basic                                          $(0.67)    $(0.43)
                                                 =========  =========
  - diluted                                        $(0.67)    $(0.43)
                                                 =========  =========
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Christopher J. Willi, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The accompanying amended annual report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Sherwood Brands, Inc.



Date: October 1, 2003



/s/    CHRISTOPHER J. WILLIChristopher J. WilliChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          89,677
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          90,771
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               166,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,202,234
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,759,510
<ALLOWANCE>                                     17,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,584,904
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,708,100
<SHORT-TERM>                                   348,801
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            231,840
<LONG-TERM>                                     73,254
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,874
<OTHER-SE>                                     203,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,584,904
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 32,642
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               18,333
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,051
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                53,026
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              25,026
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,709
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           22,317
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      150
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 69,689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,391
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      12,439
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,439
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.06
<LOANS-NON>                                      8,806
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                17,268
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                       211
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               17,629
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            17,629
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         17,629
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 65328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-28030]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-04107 and NAFTA-04107A]


American Bag Corporation, Stearns, KY; American Bag Corporation, 
Winfield, TN; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
NAFTA-Transitional Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), the Department 
of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for NAFTA 
Transitional Adjustment Assistance on September 20, 2000, applicable to 
workers of American Bag Corporation, Stearns, Kentucky. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on October 12, 2000 (65 FR 60687).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The company reports that 
worker separations occurred at the Winfield, Tennessee facility of 
American Bag Corporation. The workers are engaged in the production of 
air bags.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of American Bag Corporation affected by increased imports from 
Canada and Mexico. Accordingly, the Department is amending the 
certification to include workers of American Bag Corporation, Winfield, 
Tennessee.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-04107 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of American Bag Corporation, Stearns, Kentucky 
(NAFTA-04107) and Winfield, Tennessee (NAFTA-04107A) who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after August 
23, 1999 through September 20, 2002, are eligible to apply for 
NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.


    Signed in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of October, 2000.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-28030 Filed 10-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3373 

To prohibit incurring further obligations with respect to the healthcare.gov 

website without offsetting savings. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 29, 2013 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit incurring further obligations with respect to the 

healthcare.gov website without offsetting savings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Healthcare.gov Spend5 ing Accountability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIRING OFFSETTING SAVINGS BEFORE INCUR7 RING ANY ADDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS FOR 

8 THE HEALTHCARE.GOV WEBSITE. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi10 sion of law, no Federal official, including the Secretary 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3373 IH

1 of Health and Human Services, may incur any obligations 

2 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act with 

3 respect to the repair or maintenance of the healthcare.gov 

4 website, unless and until— 

5 (1) the President submits to Congress proposed 

6 reductions in Affordable Care Act Federal spending 

7 described in subsection (b) that are commensurate 

8 with the amount of obligations to be so incurred; 

9 and 

10 (2) the Congress enacts a law effecting spend11 ing reductions commensurate with the amount of ob12 ligations to be so incurred. 

13 (b) AFFORDABLE CARE ACT FEDERAL SPENDING.— 

14 For purposes of subsection (a), Affordable Care Act Fed15 eral spending is Federal spending to carry out the provi16 sions of, including amendments made by, the Patient Pro17 tection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148) 

18 or title I or subtitle B of title II of the Health Care and 

19 Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111– 

20 152). 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3350 

To authorize health insurance issuers to continue to offer for sale current 

individual health insurance coverage in satisfaction of the minimum essential health insurance coverage requirement, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 28, 2013 

Mr. UPTON (for himself, Mr. HALL, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. OLSON, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. HARPER, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Mr. CASSIDY, Mrs. 

MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. GRIFFITH of Virginia, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. 

WALDEN, Mrs. ELLMERS, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. LONG, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. LANCE, Mr. SCALISE, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. PITTS, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. BARTON, Mr. GINGREY of 

Georgia, Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois, Mr. POMPEO, Mr. LATTA, Mr. 

TERRY, Mr. MCKINLEY, and Mr. SHIMKUS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 

addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To authorize health insurance issuers to continue to offer 

for sale current individual health insurance coverage in 

satisfaction of the minimum essential health insurance 

coverage requirement, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3350 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep Your Health 

3 Plan Act of 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. IF YOU LIKE YOUR HEALTH CARE PLAN, YOU CAN 

5 KEEP IT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any provision of 

7 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (including 

8 any amendment made by such Act or by the Health Care 

9 and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010), a health insur10 ance issuer that has in effect health insurance coverage 

11 in the individual market as of January 1, 2013, may con12 tinue after such date to offer such coverage for sale during 

13 2014 in such market outside of an Exchange established 

14 under section 1311 or 1321 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 18031, 

15 18041). 

16 (b) TREATMENT AS GRANDFATHERED HEALTH

17 PLAN IN SATISFACTION OF MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COV18 ERAGE.—Health insurance coverage described in sub19 section (a) shall be treated as a grandfathered health plan 

20 for purposes of the amendment made by section 1501(b) 

21 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS