alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Synnott B. Durham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sunair Services Corporation;1. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thereport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;3. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) forthe registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.DATE: May 15, 2006/s/ Synnott B. Durham
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          18,397
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,175
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    103,897
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        418,325
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 563,866
<DEPOSITS>                                     343,748
<SHORT-TERM>                                    77,910
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,646
<LONG-TERM>                                    101,875
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,642
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 563,866
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,977
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,120
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    80
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,177
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,602
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,447
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,730
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     (357)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  16
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,577
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,627
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.41
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,091
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,072
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       51
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,072
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(a)


             SECTION 1350 Certification (Chief Executive Officer)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Financial  Corporation,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I Michael C. Gerald,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the
best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the period covered by the Report.

This Certification is provided as of August 12, 2004.



                                        /s/ Michael C. Gerald
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Michael C. Gerald
                                        President/Chief Executive Officer











                                     31
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40140 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN FRANCISCO SANCHEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-436-1

-------------------- October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent appellant Juan Francisco Sanchez-Garcia (Sanchez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Sanchez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused fromNo. -2- further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3330 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the limitation on the 

number of veterans authorized to be enrolled in programs of independent 

living services and assistance administered by the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 23, 2013 

Ms. MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico (for herself, Mr. BEN RAY

LUJA ́N of New Mexico, Mr. YODER, Mr. JEFFRIES, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. ENYART, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. HASTINGS

of Florida, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Mrs. NEGRETE MCLEOD, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. 

O’ROURKE, Ms. KUSTER, Mr. HORSFORD, Ms. TSONGAS, and Mr. 

RIBBLE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the limitation on the number of veterans authorized to be enrolled 

in programs of independent living services and assistance 

administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Independent 

5 Living Enhancement Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3330 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF VETERANS 

2 ENROLLED IN PROGRAMS OF INDEPENDENT 

3 LIVING SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE ADMINIS4 TERED BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AF5 FAIRS. 

6 (a) REPEAL.—Section 3120 of title 38, United States 

7 Code, is amended— 

8 (1) by striking subsection (e); and 

9 (2) by redesignating subsection (f) as sub10 section (e). 

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (a) of 

12 such section is amended by striking ‘‘subsection (f)’’ and 

13 inserting ‘‘subsection (e)’’. 

14 (c) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 60 days 

15 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

16 of Veterans Affairs shall submit to the Committees on 

17 Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and House of Representa18 tives a plan to educate employees of the Department of 

19 Veterans Affairs whose responsibilities relate to vocational 

20 rehabilitation counseling or employment counseling about 

21 the benefits and appropriate use of the independent living 

22 services provided under section 3120 of title 38, United 

23 States Code. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAURIE HOBSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NA; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-35198

D.C. No. 1:11-cv-00196-BLW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 13, 2014

** 

Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Laurie Hobson appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in

her action arising from foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Kaplan v. City of N. Las Vegas, 323 F.3d 1226,

1229 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.

FILED

MAY 29 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
The district court properly granted summary judgment in Hobson’s quiet title

action because Hobson failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether

the loan had been repaid. See Trusty v. Ray, 73 Idaho 232, 236 (1952) (“A mortgagor

cannot without paying his debt quiet title as against the mortgagee.” (citation and

internal quotation marks omitted)).

Hobson does not have standing to challenge defendant Wells Fargo Bank,

NA’s assignment of the property after the foreclosure sale because she no longer had

an interest in the property. See Spencer v. Jameson, 211 P.3d 106, 113 (Idaho 2009)

(stating that, except for limited circumstances not relevant here, a foreclosure “sale is

final once the trustee accepts the bid as payment in full”); see also Lujan v. Defenders

of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992) (requirements to establish standing).

Hobson’s contentions regarding the legal authority of defendant Mortgage

Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), which was the named beneficiary as

nominee for the lender in the deed of trust, to assign the deed of trust to Wells Fargo,

are unpersuasive, as they were recently rejected by the Idaho Supreme Court. See

Edwards v. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc., 300 P.3d 43, 49 (Idaho 2013)

(“[H]aving MERS the named beneficiary as nominee for the lender conforms to the

requirements of a deed of trust under Idaho law.”).

AFFIRMED.

2 12-35198
EXHIBIT 99.1
                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C
                                  SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winfield Capital Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Paul
A. Perlin, Chief Executive Officer and R. Scot Perlin, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/S/ PAUL A. PERLIN
-----------------------------
Paul A. Perlin
Chief Executive Officer


/S/ R. SCOT PERLIN
-----------------------------
R. Scot Perlin
Chief Financial Officer


August 13, 2002
#### PAUL S. MOYNIHAN *v.*ESTATE OF JOHN MOYNIHAN

*Gordon A. Evans,*in support of the petition.

*William F. Gallagher,*in opposition.

Decided May 26, 1998

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 912 (AC 17034), is denied.
29	May	2015

John	Riegel 2007	Lexington	Drive Fullerton,	CA	92835 Cell:	714

- 553

- 3446 e - mail:	jeriegel@riegelproperties.com
U.S.	Department	of	Transportation,	Docket	Operations West	Building	Ground	Floor,	Room	W12

- 140 1200	New	Jersey	Avenue,	SE Washington,	DC	20590
Exemption	Request	Section	333	of	the	FAA	Reform	Act	of	2012

Dear	FAA	Administrator, I,	John	Riegel,	am	requesting	a	COA	for	flights	at	or	below	200	feet	AGL	for	my	DJI Phantom	3	Professional	UAS.		This	aircraft	is	1280	grams	(2.8 pounds),	will	be	flown during	daytime	under	VFR	conditions	and	operate	within	VLOS	of	the	pilot (s )

. The specifications	are	shown	below. The	location	of	flight	for	the	exemption	request	is	a	Mobile	Home	Park	my	family owns	in	Barstow,	CA. Our	property	is more	that	10	NM	from	an	airport. I	wish approval	to	take	still	and	video	photography	of	mobile	homes	in	our	park	offered	for sale	or	for	rent.		All	home	sites	are	on	our	property, while most	of	the	homes	offered for	sale	or	rent	we	currently	own.		The	ph otographs	and	video	will	be	used	in marketing	brochures	and	web	site	advertising. I	plan	on	photographing	at	about	30 to	50	feet	AGL. I	am	a	soloed	Student	Pilot	and	have	finished	my	required	VFR	Ground	School. I	am	familiar	with	preflight	planning	and inspections	as	well	as	FAA	VFR	flight	rules.

Thank	you, John	RiegelSpecifications for DJI Phantom 3 Professional:

Aircraft We ight (Battery & Propellers Included) 1280 g Max. Ascent Speed 5 m/s Max. Descent Speed 3 m/s Max. Speed 16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind) Max. Flight Altitude 6000 m Max. Flight Time Approximatel y 23 minutes Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C GPS Mode GPS/GLONASS Gimbal Controllable Range Pitch:

- 90° to + 30°
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ENVIRO-CLEAN
OF AMERICA INC. & SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,833,478
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,539,908
<ALLOWANCES>                                   156,349
<INVENTORY>                                  1,683,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,978,417
<PP&E>                                       1,602,505
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,246,793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,985,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,826,447
<BONDS>                                      5,608,399
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,451
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,834,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     995,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,985,700
<SALES>                                      7,281,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,281,408
<CGS>                                        3,788,288
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,203,352
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             497,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,207,960)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (76,835)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,131,125)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,131,125)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1194

WILLIAM REID BLACK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE UNITED STATES ARMY; ARMY REVIEW BOARD AGENCY; CAPTAIN 

PULSON, Captain of Batter A 15FD; THOMAS WHITE, Secretary of 

Army (U.S.); JOHN M. MCHUGH, U.S. Army Special Affairs; RICK 

A. SCHWEIGERT, Chief Congressional Special Action Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, 

Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00889-NCT-LPA)

Submitted: May 22, 2014 Decided: May 28, 2014

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Reid Black, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William Reid Black appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), Black’s

complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents 

of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Black 

v. U.S. Army, No. 1:13-cv-00889-NCT-LPA (M.D.N.C. Jan. 23, 

2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
EX-10(BB)



 






EXHIBIT 10(bb)




Schedule of Certain Executive Officers who are Parties

to the Individual Grantor Trust Participation Agreements in the Form Attached

as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Period Ended September 30, 2003




Christopher M. Connor

John L. Ault

Sean P. Hennessy

Thomas E. Hopkins

Timothy A. Knight

John G. Morikis

Thomas W. Seitz

Louis E. Stellato

Robert J. Wells
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6665

ALVIN BOWENS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. J. VA U S, State Trooper, #9256 , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Michael Stefan Nachmanoff , District Judge. ( 1:23

- cv - 00637

- MSN

- LRV )

Submitted : October 24, 2023 Decided: January 3, 2024

Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Alvin Bowens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6665 Doc: 9 Filed: 01/03/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Alvin Bowens appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) because it was filed beyond the applicable statute
of limitations period . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Bowens v. Va w s , No. 1:23

- cv - 00 637

- MSN

- LRV (E.D. Va. June 13, 2023)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6665 Doc: 9 Filed: 01/03/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SECHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ROCHESTER
TELEPHONE CORP.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>        0000936105
<NAME>       ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,010
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,300
<INVENTORY>                                      1,545
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,707
<PP&E>                                         905,001
<DEPRECIATION>                                 578,711
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 404,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,946
<BONDS>                                         53,787
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       232,165
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,295
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   404,483
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,798
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 652
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,490
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,195
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,295
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,295
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>