alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3348 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the individual health 

insurance mandate voluntary in 2014, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 28, 2013 

Mr. BARTON (for himself, Mr. GOHMERT, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. FLORES, 

Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. PERRY, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. ROE of 

Tennessee, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. BARR, Mr. SCALISE, and Mr. 

FLEMING) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

the individual health insurance mandate voluntary in 

2014, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Obamacare Choice Act 

5 of 2013’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3348 IH

1 SEC. 2. TO MAKE THE INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE 

2 MANDATE VOLUNTARY IN 2014. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5000A(a) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ and 

5 inserting ‘‘2014’’. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1) Section 

7 5000A(c)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

8 amended— 

9 (A) by striking ‘‘2014’’ in clause (i) and 

10 inserting ‘‘2015’’, and 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘2015’’ in clauses (ii) and 

12 (iii) and inserting ‘‘2016’’. 

13 (2) Section 5000A(c)(3)(B) of such Code is 

14 amended— 

15 (A) by striking ‘‘2014’’ and inserting 

16 ‘‘2015’’, and 

17 (B) by striking ‘‘2015’’ (prior to amend18 ment by subparagraph (A)) and inserting 

19 ‘‘2016’’. 

20 (3) Section 5000A(c)(3)(D) of such Code is 

21 amended— 

22 (A) by striking ‘‘2016’’ and inserting 

23 ‘‘2017’’, and 

24 (B) by striking ‘‘2015’’ and inserting 

25 ‘‘2016’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3348 IH

1 (4) Section 5000A(e)(1)(D) of such Code is 

2 amended— 

3 (A) by striking ‘‘2014’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘2015’’, and 

5 (B) by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘2014’’. 

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall take effect as if included in section 1501 

9 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  GENERAL **OF TEXAS**  **AUSTIN**

HonorableM~urphy

Co3.e

Your resent requ ment **upon** the above stated Ion OS thls'd0pcrt013 ro00ited.

o the &ate law afirotu30.00. At the OS oltlzenepointwriter) that the

OS Liberty County shall **bs barn&**  **on $140.00**  per miillfon

dollam valuation fneteaa OS $lSB.OO OQ the million Qollcrevaluation cd providedby the present general law, hrtlcle ld45. "?&ll you please give me a statementco to the prinolpalrequirementa of such notice to **be**143

**Eonoreble** Murphy Cole, Pago 2

publiahad. **I** gather that Sao. 57 OS Artlole 3 Is the proper oonatltutlonal authority.* Saotion 57 or article 3 or the Stats Oonatltution and Articles 2 - 9, lncluslva, Vernon'sAnnotated Civil gtatutea, prescribathe mathod and manner of giving notice by any person who intends to apply for the **passage** OS any looal or speoial law not prohibitedby the Constitution. Article 1645, Vamon*s AnnotatedCivil Statutea,rsada in part aa Sollows: Win any county having a population0S thirty-five thousand Inhabitants, or over, according to the prscedingFederal oenaua, or having a tax valuation of 

### rifteen million dollars or over, acoordingto the lest approved tax rolla, there shall ba biannlally appointedan auditor of aoaountaand financaa, tha title of said offioar to be 

### oountyauaitor, who shall hold his **0rrioe** for two yearn, and who shall receive as oompensationfor hia service8 one hundred and twenty-tfvadollars for aaoh million dollars or **major** portionthereof, of the aaeaseed valuation,the annual aelary to be o-put& from tha last apprwed tax rolla, aaid annual salary from oounty fun&a ahall not axoaed thirty-mixhundred dollars,to be paid monthly out OS the general funda of the oounty up: :n"order of the commlae'lonera court.

. Liberty County has a populationOS 24,656 inhabitants ,acoordlng

to the lest Federal oansue. Howaver, the aeaeaaed valuation oS said county eccordingto tha lest approvad tax rolls ia approxlmetely $21,523,020.00, ThQrafore,Artlola 1645, aupra,which la a general statute, la epplioableto Liberty GountY* Section 56, Article 3, or the State Cooatltution inhibfta tha Lsgialaturefrom paaeingany looal or apeolel Law ra$ulatingthe asrefra of a oounty.

The propoead enaotmentwould be a looal or epaofel law attampting to regulate the affalrr of Liberty County, whloh is prohibita by Saotion 56, Article 3, of the Stats Caaatitution. Duoloa, et al v. Earria County, 263 S. W. 5623 AltgeltHonorable Murphy cole, pag, 3

t. Gutzeit, 201 9. v. 4001 **Auetln** From. v. Patton, 888 3. W. 18;e. Truatlng that the foregoing fully MIfWSra your inquiry,wso

are
APPROVED JAN 30, Your0 very truly 1941 ATTORNEYGElVIRAL OF TEXA8

ATTORNEYGENERAL

AWtRS

APPROVED ’ OPINION 00htMnT~~

c 

# l $g$ $t
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2775]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed During the Week Ending 
January 28, 2000

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. Sections 412 and 414. 
Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the 
application.
    Docket Number: OST-2000-6826.
    Dated Filed: January 27, 2000.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC3 0408 dated 28 January 2000; Mail Vote 060--Resolution 
043i; TC3 Intermediate Class Fares between Japan, Korea and South East 
Asia--Amend Fares from Singapore to Japan; Intended effective date: 1 
April 2000.

    Docket Number: OST-2000-6830.
    Dated Filed: January 27, 2000.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: CAC/27/Meet/008/Expedited/99; Cargo Agency Expedited 
Resolution 809; Intended effective date: January 1, 2000.

    Docket Number: OST-2000-6837.
    Dated Filed: January 28, 2000.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: CTC Comp 0052 dated 12 August 1997--Mail Vote 875; 
Resolution 116ss; Airline Justifications; Intended effective date--Upon 
Government Approvals.

Dorothy W. Walker,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-2775 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

936 

CA 13-00119 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

 

 

THOMAS BURKE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

COUNTY OF ERIE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (RYAN J. LUCINSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

CANTOR, DOLCE & PANEPINTO, P.C., BUFFALO (JONATHAN M. GORSKI OF

COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal, by permission of the Appellate Division of the Supreme

Court in the Fourth Judicial Department from an order of the Supreme

Court, Erie County (Tracey A. Bannister, J.), entered October 12,

2012. The order, among other things, denied the motion of defendant

to compel and for a protective order. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is 

unanimously modified on the law by granting that part of the motion to

compel a second deposition of the nonparty witness and as modified the

order is affirmed without costs. 

Memorandum: In this Labor Law action, plaintiff’s counsel served

a nonparty witness subpoena on the only eyewitness to the accident

demanding that he appear for a deposition. The nonparty witness had

commenced a separate Labor Law action arising from a different

construction site accident and retained plaintiff’s counsel to

represent him in that lawsuit. Plaintiff’s counsel asked the nonparty

witness various questions about plaintiff’s accident, and then

defendant’s counsel asked the nonparty witness questions that

established that plaintiff and the nonparty witness were both

carpenters in the same union, they both had pending lawsuits involving

the same employer, and they both retained the same attorneys. When

defendant’s counsel asked if plaintiff was going to be a witness in

the nonparty witness’s case, plaintiff’s counsel objected and directed

the nonparty witness not to answer. Plaintiff’s counsel further

objected and directed the nonparty witness not to answer when

defendant’s counsel asked the nonparty witness whether plaintiff’s

counsel was representing him in connection with the deposition. 

Thereafter, the deposition was discontinued.

Defendant moved, inter alia, for an order compelling a second

deposition of the nonparty witness and prohibiting plaintiff’s counsel
-2- 936 

CA 13-00119 

from interfering with that deposition. Supreme Court denied the

motion, and we now modify the order by granting that part of the

motion seeking to compel a second deposition of the nonparty witness. 

The questions asked by defendant’s counsel were relevant with respect

to the nonparty witness’s bias or motive (see generally CPLR 3101 [a];

Salm v Moses, 13 NY3d 816, 818). Thus, the questions should have been

“ ‘freely permitted and answered’ ” (Roggow v Walker, 303 AD2d 1003,

1004). In any event, we agree with defendant that it is entitled to a

second deposition of the nonparty witness in order to cross-examine

the witness regarding the circumstances of the accident.

Entered: October 4, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
[Cite as State v. Shepherd , 2022
- Ohio
- 2531.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO , Appellee,

- vs -

MARLAYON SHEPHERD , Appellant. :

:

:

:

:

: CASE NO. CA20 21

- 1 1

- 144

D E C I S I O N 7/25/2022

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR

- 2020

- 02

- 0270

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee

. Christopher P. Frederick, for appellant

.

Per Curiam

. {¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by appellant, Marlayon Shepherd , the transcript of the docke t and journal entries, the tran script of proceedings and original papers from the Butler C ounty Court of Common Pleas, and upon the amended brief filed by appellant's counse l. {¶2} Appellant's c ounsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967) , which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial cour t prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;Butler CA2021

- 11

- 144

(2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders , at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently t o determine whether the proceed ings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error pr ejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

PIPER , P.J., S. POWELL and H ENDRICKSON , JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27213]



[[Page 63619]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[MT-924-1430-ET; MTM 89170]


Withdrawal of Public Land to Aid in Reclamation of the Zortman-
Landusky Mining Area; Montana

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice corrects Public Land Order No. 7464, 65 FR 59463, 
published October 5, 2000.
    The legal description in the second column, in the fifth line under 
Sec. 17, which reads ``W\1/2\SW\1/2\SE\1/4\'' is corrected to read 
``W\1/2\SW\1/4\SE\1/4\.''

    Dated: October 6, 2000.
Phyllis A. Brosz,
Acting Chief, Branch of Land Resources, Division of Resources.
[FR Doc. 00-27213 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
#### J. Edward HODGES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 25355.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 30, 1951.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for an assault by a motor vehicle; the penalty assessed is a fine of $150.00.

Since perfecting his appeal, appellant has filed a written motion, duly verified, requesting the dismissal thereof. The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
    
    
    FOR THE YEAR ENDED
    
    
    FOR THE YEAR ENDEDDecember 31, 2009
    
    
    December 26, 2008
    
    
    December 28, 2007MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCHPREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERREDCAPITAL TRUST III
    
    

FUNDING III, L.P.
    
    
    CAPITAL TRUST III
    
    

FUNDING III, L.P.
    
    
    CAPITAL TRUST III
    
    
    FUNDING III, L.P.Earnings
    
    $
    54,124
    
    
    $
    63,068
    
    
    $
    54,124
    
    
    $
    63,244
    
    
    $
    54,124
    
    
    $
    63,480Fixed charges
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Preferred securities
distribution
requirements
    
    
    52,500
    
    
    
    54,124
    
    
    
    52,500
    
    
    
    54,124
    
    
    
    52,500
    
    
    
    54,124Total combined fixed
charges and preferred
securities distribution
requirements
    
    $
    52,500
    
    
    $
    54,124
    
    
    $
    52,500
    
    
    $
    54,124
    
    
    $
    52,500
    
    
    $
    54,124Ratio of earnings to
combined fixed charges
and preferred securities
distribution requirements
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
    
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
    
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
month:_________(year:________

UAS$#:$___________

Date(Issue(

Discovered

Date(Issue(

Addressed

Software(Updates

Airframe(

Engines

Propellers

Camera(Gimbal

Landing(Gear

Vibration(Dampening

Other:

MONTHLY$MAINTENANCE$LOG

Issue(Description(&(Maintenance(Conducted Maintenance(Performed(By:(((

Print(&(Sign
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 211 (Tuesday, October 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 65037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27861]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Notice of Meeting of the Industry Functional Advisory Committee 
for Customs Matters (IFAC-1)

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Industry Functional Advisory Committee for Customs Matters 
will hold a meeting on November 9, 2000, from 9:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. The 
meeting will be closed to the public from 9:30 a.m. to 12 noon, and 
opened to the public from 12 noon to 1 p.m.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for November 9, 2000, unless otherwise 
notified.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Department of Commerce, Room 
B841B, located at 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC, unless otherwise notified.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Gardner, (202) 482-3681 and 
Katherine Wiehagen (202) 482-0357, Department of Commerce, 14th Street 
and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, or Dominic Bianchi, 
Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, 1724 F Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20508, (202) 395-6120.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During the opened portion of the meeting the 
U.S. Customs Entry Revision Project (ERP) will be discussed by 
representatives from the U.S. Customs Service and the Bureau of the 
Census. The ERP was introduced by the Customs Service in 1999 as a 
proposal to change U.S. customs laws and make them more consistent with 
current business practices and promote effective compliance. This 
discussion is an opportunity for the Industry Functional Advisory 
Committee for Customs Matters to be briefed and invite comments on ERP 
progress to date.

Dominic Bianchi,
Acting Assistant United States Trade Representative for 
Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-27861 Filed 10-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3237 

To amend the Pay Our Military Act to provide funds for the operations 

of the National Guard. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 2, 2013 

Mr. STUTZMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To amend the Pay Our Military Act to provide funds for 

the operations of the National Guard. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guard Appropriation 

5 Restoration During Shutdown Act’’ or ‘‘GARDS Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS TO COVER NA7 TIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL AND OPER8 ATIONAL COSTS. 

9 Section 2 of the Pay Our Military Act (HR 3210 of 

10 the 113th Congress) is amended— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3237 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting before the 

2 semicolon the following: ‘‘or, in the case of members 

3 of the National Guard, who perform inactive-duty 

4 training or other service during such period for 

5 which the members would otherwise be entitled to 

6 pay and allowances’’; 

7 (2) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting before the 

8 semicolon the following: ‘‘or, without regard to any 

9 such determination, are civilian personnel of the Na10 tional Guard, including military technicians (dual 

11 status)’’; and 

12 (3) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub13 section (c) and inserting after subsection (a) the fol14 lowing new subsection: 

15 ‘‘(b) NATIONAL GUARD OPERATIONS.—There are 

16 hereby appropriated for fiscal year 2014, out of any money 

17 in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for any period 

18 during which interim or full-year appropriations for fiscal 

19 year 2014 are not in effect, such sums as are necessary 

20 to provide for the operation and maintenance of the Na21 tional Guard, including necessary sums to prevent any 

22 interruption or delay in the performance by the National 

23 Guard of domestic disaster relief and recovery oper24 ations.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### CITY OF PINEVILLE v. LEWIS.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 22, 1952.

*585W. R. Knuckles, Cleon K. Calvert, Pine-ville, for appellant.

Lay & Knuckles, Pineville, for appellee.

STANLEY, Commissioner.

The judgment holds the City of Pine-ville was without power to collect a privilege or license tax on taxicabs during the years 1947 to 1950 inclusive, and awards recovery of sums paid under the invalid ordinance to the appellee, Joe Lewis.

The case is ruled by City of Louisville v. Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Co., Ky., 238 S.W.2d 121, holding that under KRS 281.570(2) a city could not impose a license fee or tax on a taxicab operating under a permit of the State Division of Motor Transportation. The appellant seeks to escape the decision by the argument that its ordinance was enacted under the police power and imposes a license fee on the occupation of operating a taxicab, and is not a revenue measure or tax upon the means of carrying on the business. It claims authority under KRS 92.280(2). We cannot follow the. argument. The ordinance is very comprehensive and covers various professions, businesses and the instrumentalities used therein. If it had been intended'merely to impose a fee for the business of operating a common carrier using taxicabs, the holder of the license would have been at liberty to operate an indefinite and large fleet of cars for the one license or fee. The tax is, “For each taxicab, $35.00.” It is primarily a revenue measure, although what it may be called is immaterial. City of Louisville v. Sebree, 308 Ky. 420, 214 S.W.2d 248. The case is clearly within the City of Louisville case, supra.

The judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# Contact Person for More Information:

Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the Board; 202-452-3204.

# Supplementary Information:

You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.

Dated: October 20, 2000.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 00-27447  Filed 10-20-00; 3:51 pm]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-M