alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3366 

To provide for the release of the property interests retained by the United 

States in certain land conveyed in 1954 by the United States, acting 

through the Director of the Bureau of Land Management, to the State 

of Oregon for the establishment of the Hermiston Agricultural Research 

and Extension Center of Oregon State University in Hermiston, Oregon. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 29, 2013 

Mr. WALDEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the release of the property interests retained 

by the United States in certain land conveyed in 1954 

by the United States, acting through the Director of 

the Bureau of Land Management, to the State of Oregon 

for the establishment of the Hermiston Agricultural Research and Extension Center of Oregon State University 

in Hermiston, Oregon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3366 IH

1 SECTION 1. RELEASE OF RETAINED INTERESTS IN BUREAU 

2 OF LAND MANAGEMENT LAND CONVEYED TO 

3 THE STATE OF OREGON FOR ESTABLISH4 MENT OF HERMISTON AGRICULTURAL RE5 SEARCH AND EXTENSION CENTER. 

6 (a) RELEASE OF RETAINED INTERESTS.—Any res7 ervation or reversionary interest retained by the United 

8 States in connection with the conveyance pursuant to the 

9 first and second sections of the Act of September 23, 1950 

10 (chapter 1005; 64 Stat. 981) of certain land by the United 

11 States to the State of Oregon for the establishment of the 

12 Hermiston Agricultural Research and Extension Center of 

13 Oregon State University in Hermiston, Oregon, is hereby 

14 released without consideration. 

15 (b) INSTRUMENT OF RELEASE.—The Secretary of 

16 the Interior, acting through the Director of the Bureau 

17 of Land Management, shall execute and file in the appro18 priate office a deed of release, amended deed, or other ap19 propriate instrument reflecting the release of retained in20 terests under subsection (a). 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   3,031
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,913
<ALLOWANCES>                                   6,250
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         36,110
<DEPRECIATION>                                 8,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 405,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        329,592
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       29,570
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   405,873
<SALES>                                        16,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               42,061
<CGS>                                          13,067
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  13,067
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               15,537
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               2,888
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             9,117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,452
<INCOME-TAX>                                   406
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,046
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,046
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .19



</TABLE>
----

| a)   | all      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,      process, summarize and report financial information;  and |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| b)   | any      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control      over financial reporting. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | August 12, 2010 | /s/ Richard D. Sieradzki                                       |
|--------|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |            | Richard      D. Sieradzki                                      |
|   |            | Chief      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting  Officer |

----
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated 1998 New



 Exhibit 10.39 
  
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 CAREMARK RX, INC. 1998 NEW EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 (FORMERLY THE MEDPARTNERS, INC. 
 1998 NEW EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN) 
  
 This Second Amendment to the Caremark Rx, Inc. 1998 New Employee Stock Option
Plan (formerly the Medpartners, Inc. 1998 New Employee Stock Option Plan) (the “Plan”) to be effective as of January 12, 2001. 
  
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
  
 WHEREAS, Caremark Rx, Inc. (the “Company”) currently sponsors and maintains the Caremark Rx, Inc. 1998 New Employee Stock Option Plan (formerly
the Medpartners, Inc. 1998 New Employee Stock Option Plan) (the “Plan”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, Section 11.1 of the Plan grants the Compensation Committee of the Board the power at any time to amend the Plan, and the Compensation Committee now wishes to amend the Plan to modify the vesting
provisions for options granted under the Plan on and after January 12, 2001; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as indicated below: 
  
 1. 
  
 Section 6.4 of the
Plan is amended effective as of January 12, 2001, to read as follows: 
  
 6.4 VESTING OF OPTIONS. Unless otherwise designated by the Compensation, each Option granted pursuant to this Plan shall vest as follows: 
  
 (a) 34% of the Options granted shall vest on the Option grant date; 
  
 (b) 33% of the Options granted shall vest on each of the
first anniversary and second anniversary of the Option grant date; 
  
 Second Amendment to the 
 Caremark Rx, Inc. 1998 New Employee Stock Option Plan 
 Page 1 







 provided, however, that for Options granted prior to January 12, 2001, if during the first year
after the Option grant date, the stock price of the Shares closes at or above $12.00 for any twenty (20) out of thirty (30) consecutive trading days, the 33% of the Options due to vest on the first anniversary of the Option grant date
shall vest immediately at the end of such 20th day, and provided, however, that for Options granted prior to January 12, 2001, if during the second year after the Option grant date, the stock price of the Shares closes at or above $18.00 for
any twenty (20) out of thirty (30) consecutive trading days, the 33% of the Options due to vest on the second anniversary of the Option grant date shall vest immediately at the end of such 20th day. 
  
 2. 
  
 The name of the Plan is changed effective as of January 12, 2001 from the Medpartners, Inc. 1998 New Employee Stock
Option Plan to the Caremark Rx, Inc. 1998 New Employee Stock Option Plan. All references in any Company documents to the Medpartners, Inc. 1998 New Employee Stock Option Plan shall, after January 12, 2001, be a reference to the Caremark Rx,
Inc. 1998 New Employee Stock Option Plan. 
  
 3. 
  
 All other provisions of the Plan not inconsistent herewith are hereby
confirmed and ratified. 
  
 Approved by the Board of Directors by
resolutions on January 12, 2001. 
  
 Second Amendment to the

 Caremark Rx, Inc. 1998 New Employee Stock Option Plan 
 Page 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,032,498
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,052,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,084,717
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,843,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,934,337
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,462)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,843,050
<SALES>                                         44,962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               546,437
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               163,355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             346,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,582
<INCOME-TAX>                                    36,582
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,582
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,582
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    36.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    36.58
        

</TABLE>
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 12, 2006

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH EUGENE WRIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 05-6203

(D.C. No. 91-CR-51-R)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before KELLY, O’BRIEN, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.**

Defendant-Appellant Kenneth Eugene Wright appeals the district court’s

denial of his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) to modify his sentence. Mr.

Wright was convicted of possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute, 21

U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and was sentenced to 292 months imprisonment and four

years supervised release. He appealed his sentence and it was affirmed. United
- 2 -

States v. Wright, No. 91-6349, 1993 WL 204158 (10th Cir. June 7, 1993)

(unpublished). His certiorari petition to the Supreme Court was denied. Wright

v. United States, 510 U.S. 927 (1993). A 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion was dismissed

as untimely.

 Mr. Wright contends that Amendment 591 of the Sentencing Guidelines

applies to his sentence. The district court rejected this contention. We review the

district court’s determination de novo. United States v. Smartt, 129 F.3d 539, 540

(10th Cir. 1997). Section 3582(c)(2) allows the district court to reduce a term of

imprisonment if the defendant’s sentence was based on a sentencing range that

“subsequently has been lowered by the Sentencing Commission.” Smartt, 129

F.3d at 540 (internal quotations and citations omitted). While § 1B1.10 gives

Amendment 591 retroactive effect, the Amendment does not apply to Mr.

Wright’s sentence. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(c). Mr. Wright’s interpretation of the

scope of that amendment is in error. Amendment 591 amends § 1B1.1(a), §

1B1.2(a), the Commentary to § 1B1.2 and § 2D1.2, and Appendix A (Statutory

Index). See id. Mr. Wright was sentenced under § 2D1.1, not under § 2D1.2. As

such, Amendment 591’s changes to § 2D1.2 do not affect Mr. Wright’s sentence.

AFFIRMED. Mr. Wright’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is

DENIED.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.
- 3 -

Circuit Judge
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

K.M., the mother,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM

Appellees.

No. 4D18-791 

[July 26, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Stacey Schulman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2017-4770 DP.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant 

Regional Counsel, Office Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, 

West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carolyn Schwarz, 

Assistant Attorney General, Children’s Legal Services, West Palm Beach, 

for appellee.

Rocco J. Carbone, III, Law Office of Rocco J. Carbone, III, PLLC, St. 

Augustine, and Thomasina Moore, Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian ad 

Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN, JJ., and HARPER, BRADLEY, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
U .S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

RECEIVED 

JUL 1 ^ 2010 

HEARING DOCKET 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 

Complainant, 

vs. 

JOSMAN BLYTHE. 

Respondent. 

FAA Docket No. CP10SO0005 

Judge Benkin p ^ ^-DjO'DSi ^ 

COMPLAINANT'S RESPONSE TO ORDER FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW OF 

DOCUMENTS 

Pursuant to the ALJ's Order dated July 1, 2010 (received by the Complainant via regular mail on 

July 8, 2010), attached are the following documents which were withheld from the Respondent 

as indicated in the Complainant's response to Respondent's motion to compel: 

Attachment 1 - FAA Form 2150-1 (3pgs) 

Attachment 2 - ASO-230 Sanction Recommendation (1 pg) 

Attachment 3 - Section B of the Enforcement Investigative Report for Respondent (6pgs) 

cr; 
All other portions of the investigative file have been previously provided to the Respondent. 

Furthermore, the Complainant incorporates all arguments previously stated in its response to 

Respondent's motion to compel. 

Respectfully submitted this 8"' day of July, 2010. 

NICOLE L. JACKSON 

Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that the foregoing Response to Order for In Camera Review of Dcouments has 

been sent via facsimile and regular mail to: 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

(FAX) (202) 366-7536 

And certified-return receipt and regular mail to: 

Josman Blythe (without attachments) 

c/o Douglas Blythe 

536 Medcalf Drive S.W. 

Sunsset Beach, NC 28468 

and the original and one copy via regular mail to: 

Federal Aviation Administration (without attachments) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 

fiiftzS^^^ 

Dated 
e 

LLS. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

July 16, 2010 

rft-^i^^ '.v:«K.» *.** ^ EMbiui a 

^ 

JUL 1 3 2010 

HEARING DOCKET 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Nicole L. Jackson, Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southern Region, ASO-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

Re: In the Matter of Josman Blythe, FAA Docket No. CP10SO0005 

Dear Ms. Jackson: 

FW ^^' ^ 3 1 ^ 

Pursuant to the Withdrawal of Complaint filed on July 9, 2010, the Josman Blythe case is closed. 

The documents you provided for inspection pursuant to my Order for In Camera Review are 

enclosed, as the issue is now moot. 

Enclosures 

Isaac u. jBenkin 

Adminisn-ative Law Judge 

cc: 

Josman Blythe 

c/o Douglas Blythe 

536 Medcalf Drive S.W. 

Sunset Beach, NC 28468 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 

800 Independence Ave, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591
EXHIBIT 23.01

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


The Board of Directors
European Micro Holdings, Inc.

We consent to incorporation  by reference in the registration  statement on Form
S-8 (No.  333-69215)  of our report  dated  August  20,  1999,  relating  to the
consolidated balance sheets of European Micro Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of  June  30,  1999  and  1998,  and  the  related  consolidated  statements  of
operations,  shareholders'  equity  and cash  flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended June 30, 1999, which report appears in the June 30, 1999
annual report on Form 10-K of European Micro Holdings, Inc.


KPMG LLP

/s/ KPMG LLP
------------

Nashville, Tennessee
September 28, 1999
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

                    By Notice dated June 7, 2000, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 22, 2000, (65 FR 38861), Wildlife Laboratories, Inc., 1401 Duff Drive, Suite 600, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of carfentanil (9743), a basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule II.                

The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substance for distribution to its customers.

No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in title 21, United States Code, section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Wildlife Laboratories to manufacture carfentanil is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Wildlife Laboratories to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. This investigation included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and 1.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed above is granted.

Dated: October 17, 2000.

John H. King,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-27428  Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIRD DISTRICT , AT AUST IN NO. 03-01-00119-CR Larry L ee Hodges , Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE

DISTRICT CO URT OF BELL COUNT Y, 264TH JUDICIAL

DISTRICT NO. 51, 484, HONORAB LE J OE CARROL

L, JUDGE

PRESIDING PER CURIAM

Appe llant ’s motionto dismiss this appeal is granted. SeeTex. R. App. P. 42. 2(a). The appeal is dismissed. B efore Justices Kidd, B . A. Smith and Puryear Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion F iled: April 12, 2001 Do N ot Pu blish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP96-312-033]

Take notice that on October 19, 2000, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (Tennessee), tendered for filing and approval two Gas Transportation Agreements between Tennessee and Dynegy Energy Marketing and Trade (Dynegy) pursuant to Tennessee's Rate Schedule FT-A (FT-A Service Agreements) and a copy of an October 18, 2000 Firm Transportation Negotiated Rate Agreement entered into between Tennessee and Dynegy (Negotiated Rate Agreement). The filed FT-A Service Agreements and the Negotiated Agreement reflects a negotiated rate arrangement between Tennessee and Dynegy to be effective November 1, 2000 through October 31, 2001.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-27853  Filed 10-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M