alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    7
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000,000
                              
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>               11,447
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                   0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                     0
<EQUITIES>                             56
<MORTGAGE>                             56
<REAL-ESTATE>                           0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                     12,581
<CASH>                              1,388
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                      0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     16,595
<POLICY-LOSSES>                         0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                     0
<POLICY-OTHER>                     12,343
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                   0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                       229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                            15
<COMMON>                                1
<OTHER-SE>                          1,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       16,595
<PREMIUMS>                              0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                   612
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                      0
<OTHER-INCOME>                        292
<BENEFITS>                              0
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>            53
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                  238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       138
<INCOME-TAX>                           44
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                           95
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        2.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                        2.00
<RESERVE-OPEN>                          0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                     0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                       0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                      0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                        0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                         0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                 0
                              

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18D0007. WASEEM DAKER v. QUINTON RUSH, SHERIFF et al.

On May 10, 2017, the trial court entered an order denying the filing of Waseem

Daker’s pro se civil complaint and his request to proceed in forma pauperis. Daker

filed a motion in this Court requesting an extension of time to file a discretionary

application.

1 We granted the motion, giving Daker a 30-day extension to file an

application. See Case No. A17E0056, decided May 31, 2017. Daker filed this

application on July 13, 2017. We lack jurisdiction.

OCGA § 5-6-39 (a) (5) permits this Court to grant an extension of time for

filing an application for discretionary appeal where, as in this case, the request is

made “before expiration of the period for filing as originally prescribed or as

extended by a permissible previous order.” OCGA § 5-6-39 (d); see also Gable v.

State, 290 Ga. 81, 84-85 (2) (a) (720 SE2d 170) (2011). In our order granting Daker

an extension, this Court required him to file his application by July 10, 2017, which

he did not do. Filing deadlines are jurisdictional, and this Court is unable to accept

an untimely application. See Crosson v. Conway, 291 Ga. 220 (1) (728 SE2d 617)

(2012). Because Daker failed to file his application within the time limit set forth in

1 OCGA § 9-15-2 (d) provides that an order denying filing shall be appealable

in the same manner as an order dismissing a civil action. However, because Daker

is incarcerated, his appeal is controlled by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996,

which requires that he proceed by discretionary application. See OCGA § 42-12-8.

August 04, 2017
our order granting his request for an extension, we lack jurisdiction to consider his

application, and it is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/04/2017
## NUMBER 13
- 2 2
- 00 470
- CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ ROBERT B. MARTINEZ , A ppellant ,

v.
EMILIA CASTILLO MARTINEZ , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________ On a ppeal from the 150 th District Court of Bexar County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justic es Longoria and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva
Appellant filed a notice of appeal on September 19 , 202 2

. 1 On October 17, 2022 , the C lerk of the Court notified appellant that it appears that there is no final, appealable

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Fourth Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 73.001

.2 order and that he was delinquent in remitting a $ 20 5.00 filing fee. The Clerk of the Court
further notified appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal if the defect was not corrected, or the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of receipt of th e
Court’s notice

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4 2.3(b), (c). On November 17, 2022, this notice was
returned undeliverable and marked “unclaimed” and “ un able to forward

. ” On November 17, 2022, the Clerk of the Court sent a second notice of the defect and delinquency in remitting a filing fee. To date, the appellant has neither responded nor cured the defects in the notice of appeal. Additionally, appellant has failed to pay the filing fee. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.1(b) requires unrepresented parties to sign any document filed and "give the party's mailing address, telephone number, fax number, if any , and email address ." See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.1(b). The clerk’s office attempted to
make c ontact with a ppellant via telephone , and the telephone number returned a

“ subscriber not in service message.”
Furthermore , R ule 42.3 permits an appellate court, on its own initiative after giving ten days' notice to al l parties , to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution or for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules. See id. 42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, w e
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3.

CLARISSA SILVA Justice
Delivered and filed on the 2nd day of February , 202 3

.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24905]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Certification Notice--226]

Notice of Filing of Self-Certification of Coal Capability Under 
the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act

AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, DOE.

ACTION:  Notice of filing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  On September 5, 2014, Panda Liberty LLC, as owner and 
operator of a new base load electric generating plant, submitted a coal 
capability self-certification to the Department of Energy (DOE) 
pursuant to Sec.  201(d) of the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act 
of 1978 (FUA), as amended, and DOE regulations in 10 CFR 501.60, 61. 
FUA and regulations thereunder require DOE to publish a notice of 
filing of self-certification in the Federal Register. 42 U.S.C. 8311(d) 
and 10 CFR 501.61(c).

ADDRESSES:  Copies of coal capability self-certification filings are 
available for public inspection, upon request, in the Office of 
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Mail Code OE-20, Room 8G-
024, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
20585.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Christopher Lawrence at (202) 586-
5260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Title II of FUA, as amended (42 U.S.C. 8301 
et seq.), provides that no new base load electric powerplant may be 
constructed or operated without the capability to use coal or another 
alternate fuel as a primary energy source. Pursuant to FUA in order to 
meet the requirement of coal capability, the owner or operator of such 
a facility proposing to use natural gas or petroleum as its primary 
energy source shall certify to the Secretary of Energy (Secretary) 
prior to construction, or prior to operation as a base load electric 
powerplant, that such powerplant has the capability to use coal or 
another alternate fuel. Such certification establishes compliance with 
FUA section 201(a) as of the date it is filed with the Secretary. 42 U. 
S. C. 8311.
    The following owner of a proposed new base load electric powerplant 
has filed a self-certification of coal-capability with DOE pursuant to 
FUA section 201(d) and in accordance with DOE regulations in 10 CFR 
501.60, 61:

Owner: Panda Liberty LLC
Capacity: 829 megawatts (MW)
Plant Location: Towanda, PA
In-Service Date: March 5, 2016

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 10, 2014.
Brian Mills,
Director, Permitting and Siting, Office of Electricity Delivery and 
Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2014-24905 Filed 10-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION VII
 

901 NORTH 5TH STREET 

KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101 

September 23, 2011 

Gary Blackstone 

3721 Laurel Avenue 

Omaha, Nebraska 68111 

RE: SAID: 38118 

3721 Laurel Avenue 

Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Assessment 

Dear Owner/Resident: 

A Lead Based Paint assessment was recently performed on your property by the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency as part of the Omaha Lead site investigation. The purpose of 

this assessment is to determine whether a significant quantity of LBP is present on the exterior 

surface of structures, where deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc) exist 

that might increase lead concentrations in the yard above acceptable levels. 

Enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 3721 Laurel Avenue. The EPA has developed paint 

stabilization eligibility criteria that involve measuring the amount of deteriorated LBP on a 

structure and calculating the concentration of lead in soils around the home that would result if 

all of the identified deteriorated paint were to fall to the ground and uniformly mix with the soil 

under certain assumptions. During the LBP assessment, the areal extent of the deteriorated paint 

observed on structure surfaces was estimated and the lead content in the deteriorated paint was 

measured using an X-Ray Fluorescence instrument. 

The data obtained during the LBP assessment was used to estimate the increase in soil lead 

concentration that would result if all of the deteriorating paint identified in the assessment were 

to fall to the ground and mix with surface soil within six feet of the foundation of the structure. 

For purposes of this calculation, the deteriorating LBP on a structure is assumed to fall onto the 

ground surface within six feet of the foundation and be uniformly mixed with the top one inch 

of soil. The estimated lead concentration in the soil potentially caused by the deteriorating LBP 

provides a measure of the severity of LBP deterioration on individual structures. The EPA uses 

these criteria to rank properties based on the potential for recontamination of soil to occur. Paint 

stabilization is being offered at only those households with the most severe LBP problems, 

particularly where children under the age of seven reside. 

The LBP assessment performed by the EPA using the above criteria indicated that your 

house IS NOT eligible for paint stabilization. 
 

 

 

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center at 

(402) 731-3045. 

Sincerely, 

Pauletta R. France-Isetts 

Project Coordinator 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Enclosures 

Para información en español, llame al EPA Information Center (402) 731-3045. 

Omaha Lead Site LBP Assessment 

-EGEND: H - N - P - 01 -38118 Samples Analyzed 

LEVID Number d 

XRF Un~t-7-7057 BOO^ 2.30 

Sampie Numtser Lead Loading Structure/Feature Substrate Color Deteriorated 

Whdow. sickng porch, etc ) (Wood,concrete etc 1 Area
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AND THE  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              11,237
<SECURITIES>                                        11,204
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,322
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    20,395
<PP&E>                                               3,272
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      27,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4,707
<BONDS>                                              1,471
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 7
<OTHER-SE>                                          21,145
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        27,330
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1,662
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (17,341)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (17,341)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (17,341)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (2.46)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (2.46)
<FN>
<F1> EPS BASIC
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
June 8, 2010

Arkema - EPA Meeting Summary Representatives from Arkema met with EPA staff to discuss concerns about the proposed SNAP rule on HFO - 1234y f, as well as its connection to the Significant New Use Rule under TSCA . Details of the meeting were claimed as confidential business information ( CBI ) . Attachment s :

- Meeting participants (Non - EPA) - Article from Chemical Week, May 24, 2010 (copy

righted material) - Comments from the Alliance of Automotive Manufacturers - Article from Automotive Engineering International, 30 September, 2020 (copy righted material)
Exhibit 10.2

                      FRONTIER CORPORATION

             PLAN FOR THE DEFERRAL OF DIRECTORS FEES

                         Amendment No. 2



     Pursuant to Section 14, the Plan is amended, effective

August 1, 1999, as follows:

     1.   Section 9 is amended by adding to the end of the first

paragraph thereof the following:


     For purposes of this Plan, a Participant shall not be
     considered to have terminated service if he or she leaves
     the Board of Directors of the Company, its parent, its
     subsidiaries or any other affiliated company but as of such
     departure or within 30 days thereafter becomes a Board
     member of any other such company within the affiliated
     group.  Termination instead shall occur only when the
     Participant has terminated membership for at least 30 days
     from all Boards of Directors of companies within the
     affiliated group.


     2.   Effective August 1, 1999, the following new Section 17

is added to the end of the Plan:

     17.  Adoption by Parent

          This Plan may be adopted by the Company's parent with
     respect to one or more of the parent's directors.  In the
     event of such adoption, an eligible director of the parent
     may defer fees earned for services on the parent's Board in
     accordance with the provisions of this Plan.  The Company
     shall, however, continue to act as plan sponsor and plan
     administrator of this Plan and continue to perform all
     functions assigned herein specifically to the Company.  The
     phrase  "the Company and its subsidiaries" in this Plan
     shall, effective August 1, 1999, be changed to "the Company,
     its parent and its subsidiaries."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company's Board of Directors has
     caused its duly authorized representative to execute this
     Amendment on its behalf this 16th day of August, 1999.


                              FRONTIER CORPORATION



                              By   /s/ Josephine S. Trubek
                                   ----------------------------
                                   Josephine S. Trubek
                                   Corporate Secretary
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3211 

AN ACT 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to improve upon the 

definitions provided for points and fees in connection 

with a mortgage transaction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3211 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mortgage Choice Act 

3 of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF POINTS AND FEES. 

5 (a) AMENDMENT TO SECTION 103 OF TILA.—Sec6 tion 103(bb)(4) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

7 1602(bb)(4)) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)(B)’’ and insert9 ing ‘‘paragraph (1)(A) and section 129C’’; 

10 (2) in subparagraph (C)— 

11 (A) by inserting ‘‘and insurance’’ after 

12 ‘‘taxes’’; 

13 (B) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘, except as 

14 retained by a creditor or its affiliate as a result 

15 of their participation in an affiliated business 

16 arrangement (as defined in section 2(7) of the 

17 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 

18 (12 U.S.C. 2602(7))’’ after ‘‘compensation’’; 

19 and 

20 (C) by striking clause (iii) and inserting 

21 the following: 

22 ‘‘(iii) the charge is— 

23 ‘‘(I) a bona fide third-party 

24 charge not retained by the mortgage 

25 originator, creditor, or an affiliate of 

26 the creditor or mortgage originator; or 
3 

•HR 3211 EH

1 ‘‘(II) a charge set forth in section 

2 106(e)(1);’’; and 

3 (3) in subparagraph (D)— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘accident,’’; and 

5 (B) by striking ‘‘or any payments’’ and in6 serting ‘‘and any payments’’. 

7 (b) AMENDMENT TO SECTION 129C OF TILA.—Sec8 tion 129C of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1639c) 

9 is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)(5)(C), by striking ‘‘103’’ 

11 and all that follows through ‘‘or mortgage origi12 nator’’ and inserting ‘‘103(bb)(4)’’; and 

13 (2) in subsection (b)(2)(C)(i), by striking ‘‘103’’ 

14 and all that follows through ‘‘or mortgage origi15 nator)’’ and inserting ‘‘103(bb)(4)’’. 

16 SEC. 3. RULEMAKING. 

17 Not later than the end of the 90-day period beginning 

18 on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Bureau of 

19 Consumer Financial Protection shall issue final regula-
4 

•HR 3211 EH

1 tions to carry out the amendments made by this Act, and 

2 such regulations shall be effective upon issuance. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 9, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3211 

AN ACT 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to improve 

in connection with a mortgage transaction. upon the definitions provided for points and fees
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I,Barry L. Edwards, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q/A of *SOURCECORP*,Incorporated (the “registrant”);

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting;

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)   All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: March 23, 2005 | By:    |    /s/  Barry L. Edwards                |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | Barry L. Edwards                                       |
|                      |   | Executive  Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----