alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,780,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               40,431,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,810,000
<INVENTORY>                                 87,020,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           132,761,000
<PP&E>                                      32,935,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,711,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             185,738,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       50,015,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       171,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  98,755,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               185,738,000
<SALES>                                    278,496,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           278,496,000
<CGS>                                      209,458,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              209,458,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               700,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,808,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             24,671,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,646,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         16,025,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                266,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                15,759,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .85
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3264 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3264

   Eliminating the debt ceiling for a period defined, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 2013

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   Eliminating the debt ceiling for a period defined, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fiscal Sanity Act for the National 
Debt''.

SEC. 2. NONAPPLICABILITY OF DEBT CEILING.

    Section 3101(b) of title 31, United States Code, shall not apply 
for the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and 
ending 180 days thereafter.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1


                                                  


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

                              OMEGA WORLDWIDE, INC.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               Jurisdiction of
         Names                                                                  Incorporation
         -----                                                                  
-------------
<S>                                                                           <C>
Omega (UK) Limited ........................................................   England
Omega (Australia) Pty. Limited ............................................   Australia
PHF No.1 Pty Limited ......................................................   Australia
PHF No.2 Pty. Limited .....................................................   Australia
Principal Healthcare Finance Pty. Limited .................................   Australia
Principal Healthcare Finance Trust.........................................   Australia
Beheer-en Beleggingsmaatschappij Rocla BV..................................   Netherlands
Beheer-en Beleggingsmaatschappij Dilava BV.................................   Netherlands
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than November 8, 2000. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas**                    (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:                 

*1. Wendell Don Sapaugh, Sulphur Springs, Texas;*                     to acquire additional voting shares of Sulphur Springs Bancshares, Inc., Sulphur Springs, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of City National Bank, Sulphur Springs, Texas.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 19, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-27324 Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3354 

To require that spent nuclear fuel be stored in certified dry cask storage, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 28, 2013 

Mr. ENGEL (for himself and Mrs. LOWEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require that spent nuclear fuel be stored in certified 

dry cask storage, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dry Cask Storage 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DRY CASK SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL STORAGE. 

7 (a) REQUIRED DESIGNATION.—The Nuclear Regu8 latory Commission shall establish a procedure to require 

9 designation of spent nuclear fuel contained in storage 

10 pools as qualified to be placed in dry cask storage when 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3354 IH

1 the fuel has cooled sufficiently to permit such storage 

2 method. 

3 (b) FUEL CURRENTLY IN POOLS.—As soon as prac4 ticable, but not later than 15 years after the date of enact5 ment of this Act, all spent nuclear fuel that is contained 

6 in storage pools as of such date of enactment and qualified 

7 to be placed in dry cask storage shall be moved to dry 

8 casks certified by the Commission. 

9 (c) DISPOSITION.—Except as provided in subsection 

10 (b), not later than 1 year after fuel is designated by the 

11 Commission pursuant to subsection (a) as qualified to be 

12 placed in dry cask storage— 

13 (1) such fuel shall be moved from storage pools 

14 and placed in certified dry casks; and 

15 (2) such casks shall, to the extent the Commis16 sion considers appropriate after conducting a cost17 benefit analysis, be stored temporarily in hardened 

18 onsite storage facilities. 

19 (d) COSTS OF COMPLIANCE.—The Secretary of En20 ergy shall determine the costs required for compliance 

21 with subsection (b) or (c) by the owner of spent nuclear 

22 fuel, and shall reduce by that amount the amount due 

23 from that owner pursuant to section 302 of the Nuclear 

24 Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10222). 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3354 IH

1 (e) ANNUAL STATUS REPORTS.—The Nuclear Regu2 latory Commission shall require each facility storing spent 

3 nuclear fuel to submit to the Commission an annual report 

4 describing— 

5 (1) the total amount of spent fuel stored onsite, 

6 whether in storage pools, dry casks, hardened onsite 

7 storage facilities, or some other storage method; 

8 (2) how much of the fuel is stored using each 

9 method of storage; and 

10 (3) how much of the fuel has been moved from 

11 one storage method or location to another during the 

12 past year. 

13 (f) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 1 year after the 

14 date of enactment of this Act, the Nuclear Regulatory 

15 Commission shall issue regulations for carrying out this 

16 Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D23-0488 

LT Case No. 16-2015-CF-10331

_____________________________ 

JOSHUA M. COUNCIL, 

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. 

Adrian G. Soud, Judge. 

Ryan Edward McFarland, of Kent & McFarland, Jacksonville, for 

Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

March 1, 2024

HARRIS, J.

Joshua Council was found guilty of attempted first-degree 

murder following the shooting of his girlfriend, Vickie Pittman. He 

was designated a prison releasee reoffender and sentenced to life 

in prison. Several years following his conviction, Council filed a 

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 postconviction motion 

raising nine grounds for relief, all sounding in ineffective 
2 

assistance of counsel. The State was directed to file a response to 

three of those nine claims, and following receipt of the State’s 

response, the court entered an order summarily denying Council’s 

motion. In this appeal, Council challenged the denial of six of the 

nine grounds he raised. We find merit to one of Council’s 

arguments on appeal. 

In Ground I of his motion (not one of the grounds to which the 

State was ordered to respond), Council argued that his trial 

attorney was ineffective for failing to object to a number of 

improper prosecutorial comments made during closing arguments. 

Council then specified several of the comments to which his motion 

referred. The court’s order denying Council’s motion specifically 

addressed claims A–H but then for reasons not entirely clear failed 

to address ground I in any way. 

We remand this matter to the postconviction court with 

instructions to rule on Ground I. If the court determines the 

ground to be legally insufficient, Council should be given leave to 

amend that ground. Otherwise, the court shall hold an evidentiary 

hearing on the claims raised in Ground I or attach portions of the 

record conclusively showing that Council is entitled to no relief. 

See Graff v. State, 922 So. 2d 1058, 1060 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)

(remanding for further proceedings where postconviction court 

failed to address grounds raised in postconviction motion and did 

not attach portions of the record showing no entitlement to relief). 

In all other respects, we affirm the order denying Council’s motion. 

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED. 

LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur. 
3 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________
EXHIBIT 15

November 4, 2002

Board of DirectorsSuperior Uniform Group,
Inc.Seminole, Florida

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Superior Uniform Group, Inc. and subsidiary for the periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, as indicated in our report dated October 30, 2002; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, is incorporated by reference in
Registration Statement No. 2-85796 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the
Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

|                                           |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------ |  |  | 
|/s/ DELOITTE &TOUCHE,LLP                   |  |  | 
|                                           |  |  | 
|Certified Public AccountantsTampa, Florida |  |  |
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 11, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 60420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-26052]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-1-000]


PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Change in FERC Gas Tariff

October 4, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 2, 2000, PG&E Gas Transmission, 
Northwest Corporation (PG&E GTN) tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1-A, Twentyeighth Revised 
Sheet No. 4, with an effective date of November 1, 2000.
    PG&E GT-NW states that this tariff sheets is filed to modify the 
rate for service under Rate Schedule FTS-1(E-2)(WWP) in accordance with 
the negotiated rate formula for that service as specified in PG&E GTN's 
tariff.
    PG&E GTN further states that a copy of this filing has been served 
on PG&E GT-NW's jurisdictional customers and interested state 
regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protest must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-26052 Filed 10-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Friday, November 24, 2000.

# PLACE:

 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference Room.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb, 

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-27601 Filed 10-23-00; 4:00 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Exhibit 23.1 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-112847) of Vicuron PharmaceuticalsInc. of our report dated March 10, 2005 relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Selected Financial Data” in this Form 10-K 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Philadelphia, PA 

March 15, 2005
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the

limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

No. 98-10481

_________________________________

REBECCA SHERROD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

---------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern Distric of Texas, Dallas

(3:97-CV-1373-D)

---------------------------------

November 20, 1998

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rebecca Sherrod (“Sherrod”) once again appeals from a

summary judgment dismissing a retaliation claim brought

against American Airlines, Inc. (“American”). In Sherrod v.

American Airlines, Inc., 132 F.3d 1112 (5th Cir. 1998)

(“Sherrod I”), we upheld a summary judgment against Sherrod

wherein she claimed discrimination and retaliation in the

face of American’s proffered legitimate, nonpretextual claim

that Sherrod was ineligible for rehire. In the instant
2

case, the district court found that Sherrod had failed to

create a fact issue that American’s declaration that she was

not eligible for rehire was a pretext for discrimination,

and that our final determination in Sherrod I, that American

did not discriminate when it declared Sherrod ineligible for

rehire, collaterally estopped her present attack on the same

legitimate, nonpretextual basis for American’s complained of

act in the instant case. We agree, and affirm essentially

for the reasons set forth in Judge Fitzwater’s succinct and

cogent memorandum and order dated April 1, 1998. AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18

December 21, 2001



           Re: Amendment to DOCSIS IPR Agreement to cover DOCSIS 2.0


Dear Dr. Rakib:

This letter amends the Data Over Cable Service Interface Specifications License
Agreement between CableLabs and Imedia Semiconductor Corporation, dated December
21, 2001, (the "Agreement") to confirm that the royalty-free license granted by
the Agreement includes the new DOCSIS 2.0 specification.

1.   Section 7.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows:

     "7.1 Periodic Amendments. CableLabs may revise the Specifications from time
     to time until June 1, 2005..."

2.   CableLabs deems DOCSIS 2.0 a "Major Change" as defined in Section 7.2 of
     the Agreement. By your signature below, you waive your right set forth in
     Section 7.2 of the Agreement to object to the inclusion of your
     contributions to DOCSIS 2.0 (currently identified as SP-RFIv2.0-W03-011112)
     into the Specifications (as defined in the Agreement). This waiver shall
     not apply to any of your intellectual property that was contributed into
     DOCSIS 2.0 without your knowledge and consent, nor shall it apply to
     possible future versions of DOCSIS, such as 2.1 or 3.0. You agree to advise
     CableLabs without delay if you believe any of your intellectual property
     has been inadvertently added to DOCSIS 2.0.

Except as modified by this letter, the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.

We trust that this amendment and waiver will be acceptable to you. If so, please
sign and date both originals, and return one to Mrs. Dorothy Raymond, our
General Counsel, at our address shown below.

Very truly yours,                       AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:

/s/ Christopher J. Lammers              Imedia Semiconductor Corporation
Christopher J. Lammers

Executive Vice President and            By: /s/ Zaki Rakib
Chief Operating Officer                 Name: Zaki Rakib
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                        Dated: December 21, 2001

DGR/ebg