alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


ANCHOR GLASS CONTAINER CORPORATION
STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31             PERIOD FROM
                                                          ---------------------------       FEBRUARY 5, TO 1997
                                                                                                     TO
                                                            1999               1998          DECEMBER 31, 1997
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                      <C>               <C>                   <C>
Net loss applicable to common stock                      $  (31,161)       $  (22,807)           $  (22,773)
Divided by:

Weighted average shares outstanding, plus                 1,764,892         1,410,531             1,242,344
Weighted average warrants outstanding                     3,486,464         3,044,935             1,958,804
                                                         ----------        ----------            ----------

                                                          5,251,356         4,455,466             3,201,148
                                                         ----------        ----------            ----------

Basic net loss per share                                 $    (5.93)       $    (5.12)           $    (7.11)
                                                         ==========        ==========            ==========
</TABLE>
#### FREEMAN et al. v. CITY OF CORBIN et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 23, 1953.

Joe S. Feather, Williamsburg, Thomas F. Young and H. M. Sutton, Corbin, for appellants.

Hiram H. Owens, Barbourville, for ap-pellees.

CAMMACK, Justice.

This case involves the right of the City Commissioners of Corbin, a city of the third class, to create a new Board of Tax Supervisors after it developed that the acts of a previous Board were void, because no notice, of its action had been given the taxpayers. The appellants sought to enjoin the second Board from acting. The appeal is from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to their petition.

The City acted under the following part of KRS 92.470:

> “Omitted property or irregular or improper assessment in cities of third class. (1) Where any .property in a city of the third class has not been assessed, or has been irregularly or improperly assessed, or where notice of the time and place of the meeting of the board of supervisors has not been properly or regularly given, the city •may pass an ordinance directing the assessment of the property, or making ■correction in the assessment irregularly or improperly made, and giving notice of the place and time of the meeting of the board of tax supervisors so that any taxpayer may appear before that board. * * * ”

*498We think this statute dearly gives the City the right to proceed as it did. Since •the proceedings of the first Board were void, they amounted to nought. As a general proposition, a municipality is not es-topped by the void acts of its officers from proceeding to perform legal acts. Forbes v. City of Ashland, 246 Ky. 669, 55 S.W.2d 917. We can not agree with the contention of the appellants that KRS 92.470 was intended to deal only with “unpaid taxes, omitted taxes and improper and irregular assessments, and not to taxpayers assessed in the true names of the property owners.”

Judgment affirmed.
#### Norris *v.*Philadelphia Life Insurance Company et al., Appellants.

Argued September 28, 1939.

Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker, Rhodes and Hirt, JJ.

*297November 15, 1939:

*Frank R. Ambler,*for appellants.

*John B. Martin,*with him *Duane, Morris & Heekscher,*for appellee.

Pee Cubiam,

The judgment of the court below, sustaining the award of the compensation board, is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Lambbbton.
EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
--------------------------------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-44173 of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch Preferred Capital Trust
IV, Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P., Merrill Lynch Preferred Capital
Trust V and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. and Registration Statement
No. 333-59997 of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch Preferred Capital
Trust V and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. on Forms S-3 of our reports
dated March 23, 2007, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merrill
Lynch Preferred Capital Trust V and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. for
the year ended December 29,2006.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


New York, New York
March 23, 2007
# Contents

Data 1

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngc4m.htm

U.S. Energy Information Administration

infoctr@eia.doe.gov

# Data 1

Back to Contents
#### J. A. WALSH *&*CO., Inc. v. R. B. BUTLER, Inc.

No. A-4381.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Nov. 18, 1953.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 31, 1953.

Andrews, Kurth, Campbell & Bradley and Hall E. Timanus, Houston, for petitioner.

Coulter Hoppess, Bryan, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The application for writ of error filed pursuant to Acts 1953, 53rd Leg., p. 1026, ch. 424 [Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. arts. 1728, 1821], to review a judgment rendered on a plea of privilege, is dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the ground that no true conflict is shown between the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals and other decisions of Courts of Civil Appeals or of the Supreme Court.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3255 

Making continuing appropriations for all departments and agencies of the 

Federal Government, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 5, 2013 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

Making continuing appropriations for all departments and 

agencies of the Federal Government, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal Sanity Act for 

5 Appropriations’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS. 

7 There is hereby appropriated for 270 days after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act— 

9 (1) for each project or activity for which budget 

10 authority was provided in the Consolidated and FurVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:41 Oct 06, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3255.IH H3255

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3255 IH

1 ther Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (Public 

2 Law 113–6), an amount equal to the budget author3 ity provided in such Act, as reduced pursuant to the 

4 Presidential sequestration order dated March 1, 

5 2013, to remain available for a comparable period of 

6 availability; and 

7 (2) for entitlements and other mandatory pay8 ments whose budget authority was provided in ap9 propriations Acts for fiscal year 2013, and for activi10 ties under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, such 

11 amounts as may be necessary to maintain program 

12 levels as they existed on September 30, 2013. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS
  
 I, Steven J. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of Z Trim Holdings, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the "Registrant"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) the Report on Form 10-K for the period of the Registrant from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 
 Dated:  April 13, 2011
 By                 /s/ Steven J. Cohen
 Steven J. Cohen
 President and Director
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust IV and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended December 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kahtleen Skero, Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General
Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ KATHLEEN SKERO
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Kathleen Skero *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: March 24, 2006
_____________________

*  Kathleen Skero functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3277 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3277

To prohibit United States voluntary contributions to the regular budget 
          of the United Nations or any United Nations agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2013

 Mr. Kingston introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit United States voluntary contributions to the regular budget 
          of the United Nations or any United Nations agency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON UNITED STATES VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE 
              UNITED NATIONS AND UNITED NATIONS AGENCIES.

    (a) In General.--No funds made available to any Federal department 
or agency may be used to make United States voluntary contributions to 
the regular budget of the United Nations or any United Nations agency.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) applies with respect to funds 
made available for fiscal year 2014 and subsequent fiscal years.
                                 <all>
```
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A1 63 8

. PENNY C OOK ROBI NSO N & A SSOCI ATES, INC. d/ b/ a J OEL

ROBI NSON & ASSOCI ATES v . MARY STONE.

T h i s cas e o ri g in at ed i n m ag i s t rat e co u rt

. Fo l l o wi n g an ad v ers e ru l i n g , J o e l

Ro b i ns o n , act in g p ro s e, fi l ed th i s d i rect ap p eal

, seek i n g rev i ew b efo re t h i s Co u rt

. Ho wev er, “ [t ] h e o n l y av en u e o f ap p eal av ai l ab le fro m [a] m ag i s t rat e co urt ju d g m en t

i s p ro v i d ed b y OCGA § 1 5 -1 0 -4 1 (b ) (1 ), wh i ch al l o ws f o r a d e n o v o ap p eal t o t h e

s t at e o r s up eri o r co u rt .” Ha n d ler v. Hu l s ey , 1 9 9 Ga. Ap p

. 7 5 1

, 7 5 1 (4 0 6 SE2 d 2 2 5 )

(1 9 9 1). Th i s Co urt m ay o n l y ad d res s m ag i s t rat e co u rt m at t ers t h at al read y h av e b een

rev i ewed b y

t h e s t at e o r s u p eri o r co u rt

. See i d

. Th e Geo rg i a Co n s ti t u t i o n req ui res th at “ [a] ny co u rt s hal l t ran s fer t o t h e

ap p ro p ri at e co u rt i n t h e s t at e an y ci vi l cas e i n w h i ch it det erm i n es t h at ju ri sd i ct i o n o r

v en ue l i es el s ewh ere.” Se e Ga

. C o n s t

. o f 1 98 3

, Art

. VI, Sec. I, Par. VIII; s ee al s o

Bo s m a v. Gu n t er , 2 58 Ga. 6 6 4, 6 6 5 (3 7 3 SE2 d 3 6 8 ) (1 9 8 8 ). Acco rd i n g l y , t h is ap p eal

i s h ereb y TRANSFERRED t o t h e Fu l t o n Co u n t y St at e Co u rt

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 05/23/2016 May 23, 2016
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 309-036]
 The license for the Piney Project No 309, located on the Clarion River in Clarion County, Pennsylvania, will expire on October 12, 2002. On October 11, 2000, an application for new license was filed. The following is an approximate schedule and procedures that will be followed in processing the application: Date
ActionDecember 31, 2000
Commission notifies applicant that its application has been accepted and specifies the need for additional information and due date.January 15, 2001
Commission issues public notice of the accepted application establishing dates for filing motions to intervene and protests.March 15, 2001
Commission's deadline for the applicant for filing a final amendment, if any, to its application.June 15, 2001
Commission notifies all parties and agencies that the application is ready for environmental analysis.
 Upon receipt of any additional information and the information filed in response to the public notice of the acceptance of the application, the Commission will evaluate the application in accordance with applicable statutory requirements and take appropriate action on the application. Any questions concerning this notice should be directed to William Guey-Lee at (202) 219-2808, or email at: william.guey-lee@ferc.fed.us. David P. Boergers, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 00-27774  Filed 10-27-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27679]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. AUC-00-38-A (Auction No. 38); DA 00-2291]


Auction Of Licenses for the 700 MHz Guard Bands Scheduled for 
February 13, 2001; Comment Sought On Reserve Prices Or Minimum Opening 
Bids and Other Auction Procedural Issues: Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission (Commission) published 
in the Federal Register of October 24, 2000, a document announcing the 
auction of eight Guard Band Manager licenses (``Auction No. 38'') in 
the 700 MHz Guard Bands to commence on February 13, 2001. This auction 
will include the licenses that remained unsold in Auction No. 33, which 
closed on September 21, 2000. This document corrects the comment and 
reply comment dates of the document published on October 24, 2000.

DATES: Comments are due on or before October 27, 2000, and reply 
comments are due on or before November 3, 2000.

ADDRESSES: An original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed 
with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the 
Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, SW, 
TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Auctions and Industry Analysis 
Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Howard Davenport, 
Auctions Attorney, or Craig Bomberger, Auctions Analyst, at (202) 418-
0660; or Linda Sanderson, Project Manager, at (717) 338-2888.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of October 24, 2000 
(65 FR 63584), the Commission published a summary of its Public Notice 
regarding Auction No. 38 and sought comment on several issues relating 
to the auction. The document however, was published with incorrect 
comment and reply comment dates.
    In rule FR Doc. 00-27409 published on October 24, 2000 (65 FR 
63584) make the following corrections.
    (1) On page 63585 in the DATES caption, change the comment date to 
read ``October 27, 2000''.
    (2) On page 63585 in the DATES caption, change the reply comment 
date to read ``November 3, 2000''.
Federal Communications Commission.

Margaret Wiener,
Deputy Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division.
[FR Doc. 00-27679 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
II 

Calendar No. 389 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3060 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MAY 21, 2014 

Reported by Mr. CARPER, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 232 Southwest Johnson Avenue in Burleson, 

Texas, as the ‘‘Sergeant William Moody Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SERGEANT WILLIAM MOODY POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 232 Southwest Johnson Avenue 

7 in Burleson, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Sergeant William Moody Post Office Building’’. 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3060 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant William 

5 Moody Post Office Building’’. 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 389 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3060 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postliam Moody Post Office Building’’. enue in Burleson, Texas, as the ‘‘Sergeant Wil- al Service located at 232 Southwest Johnson AvMAY 21, 2014 

Reported without amendment 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
FINAL 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 00-618 

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

ENGINEER: Jon/GSK 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Yes 

General Eqp.: 

CBI: Yes 

Respirator: 

Health Effects: 

TLV/PEL (PMN or raw materials) : 

LaDei : 11 0 

CRSS: 

Chemical Category: . 

VP: 0.4 torr @25"C 

MW: 160.21 

Phys State:Neat: Liquid; Mfg: NK - Imported; Proc/Form: 

Solution, 

S-H,O: 68 g/L 

- 

End Use: 

Consumer Use: No 

SAT (concerns) : Related cases (if referenced) : 

Ground Water: migration to ground water is moderate; :.I -..> 

Eco: 2; All releases to surface waters. 

.' .-. Health: 1-2; inhalation, dermal, drinking water; c2 

h 

/-4 ~. -. . i. 

j ..-_ 

--: .. -.. _, 

I -".: 

- -- I. 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE, RATING: 2-3 - c.2 - .. I :--; 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 6
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 2 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: None listed 

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW No 

CBI: Yes 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 6
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 3 

PMN: 00-0618 

Site/Location: 

Days/yr : 

CBI: Yes 

- 

-* 

.. 

Process Description: 

* 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleaning, container residue, etc.): 

kg/site-day WATER over 

from: . , 

kg/site-day AIR over 

from: 

INCINERATION: 

from: 

Days /year 

Days /year 

- 

3 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 6
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 4 

PMN: 00-0618 

PROC (cont'd) : 

LANDFILL: 

from: 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE 

Tot. # of workers: 

Days/yr: 

Inhalation: 

Number of workers with inhalation exposure: 

Inhalation: 

Number of workers with inhalation exposure: 

Basis: 

Dermal: 

Basis: 

CBI: Yes 

Y 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 6
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 5 

PMN: 00-0618 

USE : 

Site/Location: 

Days/ yr : 

Process Description: 

CBI: Yes 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleaning, 

kg/site-day WATER over 

From: 

INCINERATION: 

from: 

LANDFILL : 

from: 

container residue, etc.): 

Days /year 

. - 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 6
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 6 

PMN: 00-0618 

USE (cont'd): 

:g/site-day AIR over 

from: ., 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE 

Tot. # of workers: 

Days/yr: - 

Inhalation 

Days /year 

CBI: Yes 

. -. 

Number of- workers with inhaiation exposure; 

Basis: . 4 .. 

Inhalation: 

aNumber of workers with inhalation exposure: 

Basis: -. 

Dermal: 

Basis: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 6