alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BATSON v. STATE.

No. 25094.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 17, 1951.

"No attorney on appeal, for appellants.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of' Austin, for the State.

;. MORRISON, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for permitting .intermittent playing of'slot.-machines. The jury assessed his punishment at a fine of $100.

The record is brought forward without a statement of facts or bill of exception. All proceedings appear regular. No question is presented for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

N O . 09

- 2 3

- 00254

- CV

__________________

RAILWORKS CORPORATION , Appellant

V.

MARTIN OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, LP , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 136th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. D206776

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Rail W orks Corporation and Martin Operating Partnership, LP

, the parties to

this appeal, filed a joint motion to dismiss. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)( 2 ). The

motion was filed before the Court decided the appeal.

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id . 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISM I SSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on October 25, 2023

Opinion Delivered October 26, 2023

Before Horton

, Johnson and Wright, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27447]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Meeting Act

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Monday, October 30, 2000.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: October 20, 2000.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-27447 Filed 10-20-00; 3:51 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-M
#### Claude E. KILLINGSWORTH, Appellant, v. Sam BITNER, Appellee.

No. 10257.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

.Nov. 17, 1954.

Sutton, Steib & Barr, San Angelo, for appellant.

Clyde Vinson, San Angelo, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order overruling appellant’s plea of privilege.

The assignments are that plaintiff- failed to prove venue facts by a preponderance of the evidence as required by subdivision 9a, Article 1995, V.A.C.S., and that plaintiff failed to prove by a preponderance' of the evidence that the alleged act or omission of negligence occurred in Tom Green County, the county iñ which the suit was filed.

We believe, that the court erred in oyer-ruling the plea of privilege.

The evidence is short and is that the accident happened outside thé City Limits of San Angelo, Texas on the Ballinger Highway beyond the Wayside Inn some 100 to 200 yards. . ,

The defendant’s counsel made an objection prior to the court’s ruling pointing out that the situs of the' accident had not been established by competent testimony.

Appellee concedes that no witness expressly stated that the accident was within the confines of Tom Green County.’

The burden was upon appellee to establish that the trespass occurred in Tom Green County, and admittedly this he failed to do.

*750We have concluded that the case has not been fully developed as to venue and we accordingly reverse ‘ and remand the cause to' the trial court for further proceedings.

Jackson v. Hall, 147 Tex. 245, 214 S.W.2d 458.

Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8, No. 333-85300 pertaining to the
American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended, and the Registration Statement on Form S-8, No. 333-61602 pertaining to the
American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended; the American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan; the Option Agreement between
Dr. Stephen Benton and American Bank Note Holographics, Inc., dated July 20, 1998; and the Option Agreement between Mr. Russell Lacoste and American Bank Note
Holographics, Inc., dated October 11, 1999, of American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. of our report dated March 5, 2004, with respect to the financial statements and
schedule of American Bank Note Holographics, Inc., as of and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, included in American Bank Note Holographics, Inc.'s Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

|                                  |  |                     
|--------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|                                  |  | /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|New York, New York
March 16, 2004 |  |                     

---

QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2448] 

Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification have been filed in the Commission's rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by November 14, 2000. See § 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for oppositions have expired. 

*Subject:*                     Implementation of 911 Act; Use of N11 Codes and Other Abbreviated Dialing Arrangements (CC                           ( print page 64704)                        Docket No. 92-105, WT Docket No. 00-110).                 

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                

*Subject:*                     Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding Installment Payment Financing for Personal Communications Services (PCS) Licensees (WT Docket No. 97-82).                 

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     5.                 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Magalie Roman Salas, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-27746 Filed 10-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,816
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (815)
<INVENTORY>                                    102,777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,139
<PP&E>                                          44,078
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (38,532)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,944
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,614
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   192,065
<SALES>                                        164,657
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               164,657
<CGS>                                          118,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,141
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,824
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   234
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,168
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,020
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,148
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,148
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74
        


</TABLE>
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.
 MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.By:
    
    MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General PartnerBy:
    
    /s/ THOMAS W. PERRYName:
    
    Thomas W. Perry*Title:
    
    Chief Accounting Officer and Controller
  
 *
    
    Thomas W. Perry functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3247 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3247

 Making continuing appropriations for all departments and agencies of 
            the Federal Government, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 2013

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 Making continuing appropriations for all departments and agencies of 
            the Federal Government, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fiscal Sanity Act for 
Appropriations''.

SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is hereby appropriated for 30 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act--
            (1) for each project or activity for which budget authority 
        was provided in the Consolidated and Further Continuing 
        Appropriations Act, 2013 (Public Law 113-6), an amount equal to 
        the budget authority provided in such Act, as reduced pursuant 
        to the Presidential sequestration order dated March 1, 2013, to 
        remain available for a comparable period of availability; and
            (2) for entitlements and other mandatory payments whose 
        budget authority was provided in appropriations Acts for fiscal 
        year 2013, and for activities under the Food and Nutrition Act 
        of 2008, such amounts as may be necessary to maintain program 
        levels as they existed on September 30, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
#### ROE v. STATE.

No. 22499.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 12, 1943.

Leroy Neal, of Gladewater, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for felony theft, punishment being two years in the penitentiary. The indictment charges the offense. No statement of facts or bill of exception is in the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
## \)£ > c^^ V ISO e - 27 5 t 

# Aleu t ^ ^ CORPORATIO N March , 19,201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra

y LaHoo d Secretar y U.S
. Departmen

t of Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e S.E
. Washington , D

C 2059 0 Re : Continuation of

Alask aAirlines ' Essentia

l Ai r Servic e a t Adak , Alaska , Docke t DOT-OST-2000-855 6 (.." 3
Dea r Secretar y LaHood : Thi s lette r i s t o expres s stron g suppor

t fo r the selectio n of

Alask aAirline s (o

r "Alaska" ) t

o continu e providin g Essentia l Ai r Servic e (EAS ) t

o th e communit

y of Adak , Alaska
. Th e 737-40 0 combinatio n ("combi" ) passenge r an d carg o aircraft , whic h Alask aAirline s propose s t

o continue using o n thi s route , provide s freight , mail an d carg o capacit

y tha t anon-je t carrie r simply canno t

provide
. Further , the 737-400 combi aircraf t i s equippe d wit

h Require d Navigatio n Performanc e Technology , whic h enable s th e airlin e t o reliably acces s th e airpor

t durin g inclemen

t weather , thu s reducin g diversion s an d cancellation s and , i

n turn , enablin g peopl e an

d product s t

o dependabl

y reac h th e community
. Moreover , Alaska' s servic e provide s Ada k passenger s wit

h th e benefi

t of expedite d an

d seamles s on-lin e connection s t o mos t majo r citie s i n th e "lowe r 48, " vi athe airline' s Anchorag e hub
. Al l of thes e je t servic e capabilitie s ar

e critica l t o the succes s o

f th e Ada k communit y i n maintainin g an

d growin g ou

r economy . I n Februar y of 2010 , Th e Aleut Corporatio n put

togethe r a n update d Ada

k Strategi c Developmen

t Plan , thi s pla

n includes : statu s o

n Ada k an d busines s developments , arenewabl e energ y assessment , long-ter mopportunitie s t

o watch , existing challenges , acommunication/marketin g plan , an d fiv e stan d alon e busines s plans
. Currentl y th e Corporation i s i

n the proces s of

implementin g th e Ada

k communication/marketin g plan , evaluatin g busines s opportunitie s (potentia

l acquisition s & start-u

p businesses) , an

d watchin g long-ter

mopportunities
. Th

e Aleu t Corporation , a s amajo

r Ada k stakeholder , believe s tha

t Alaska' s je t

servic e i s criticall y importan t t o th e enhanced economic developmen t o n Ada k an d t o th e well being o f

th e community
. Alask aAirline s ha s along histor

y of ai r servic e throughou

t th e stat e o f Alask aan d t o th e Ada

k community , respectfull y urg e the U.S
. Departmen

t of Transportatio n t

o selec t Alask aAirline s t

o continu e t

o provid e essentia l ai r servic e t o th e Ada k community
. W e
Sincerely
. Eri c R
. Waterma

n Directo r o f Operation s cc : Susa n Kurland , Assistan

t Secretar y fo r Aviatio n an

d Internationa

l Affairs *f5enni s DeVany , Chief

, EA S an d Domesti c Analysi s Th e Honorabl e Sea

n Pamell , Governor , Stat

e o f Alask a Leo vo n Scheben , Commissioner , Alask aStat e Departmen

t o f Transportatio n an

d Publi c Facilitie s The Honorabl e Do

n Young , U.S
. Congressma n Th e Honorabl e Lis aMurkowski , U.S
. Senato r The Honorabl e Mar

k Begich , U.S
. Senato

r
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

January 21, 2011

Mr. Michael P. Murphy

Asst. Solicitor General

P.O. Box 12548 (MC 059)

Austin, TX 78711-2548

Mr. Steven E. Aldous

Braden Varner & Aldous, P.C.

703 McKinney Ave., Suite 400

Dallas, TX 75202

RE:Case Number:  08-0419

Court of Appeals Number:  04-07-00323-CV

Trial Court Number:  2005-CI-11435

Style:THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO

v.

KIA BAILEY AND LARRY BAILEY

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion in the above-referenced cause.  You may obtain a copy of the opinion at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/recent.asp.  If you would like the opinion by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@txcourts.gov or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 08-0419Page 1**
Exhibit 32(a)

              SECTION 1350 Certification (Chief Executive Officer)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Financial  Corporation,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I Michael C. Gerald,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 to the best of
my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the Report.

This Certification is provided as of August 9, 2005.


                                               /s/ Michael C. Gerald
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Michael C. Gerald
                                               President/Chief Executive Officer


                                       34
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 0152 Directorate Identifier: 2010NM079AD 7X- 006 --- 12/18/09 7X- 092 --- 7/17/09 AMM 20 - 90 - 00 - 200 - 801 --- 7/7/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administ ration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### ROLAND DUMONT *v.*COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 635 (AC 16761), is denied.

*918
      *Jeffrey D. Brownstein,*in support of the petition.

*Alan N. Ponanski,*assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided July 2, 1998
May29. FR: Ouardipee ED. S. Superintendent 

### RE: AIR EXCURSIONS 

### P.O. Box450 

### Kake, Alaska 998JO (907) 785-3741 I ()"" 

### TJ

On 

### May 2012 Kake School Board met and approved this 

### letter of

### support Air Excursions to be tbc Essential Air Service 

### .furKake City School District and 

### are in full support oftbeircontinued presence in Kake 

### as onr aircarrier 

### serviceprovider. 

### They agreed to Air Excursions for having excellent customerrelations and supportthese two for the van/ground transportation here in Kake, and tbey like

### the avaHabiUty oflooal owners and operators. can help with anything further please let ns know, Respectfully,

Kake City School Board members

Kake City Sohoo/ District Is an Equal Opportunity Employer
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1796 Prepped by Keeia Richards


### Document

Number: 

# 50 ) VI-B- 1 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/20084:20:37

PM Sheet 50of 107-P_ 2 A-90-3 7 VI-B- 1 Thi s documen t

ha s bee n move dt o IV-B-0 2 a t th e reques t

o f th e projec t

officer . I

t wa s incorrectl y categorize doriginally .



### NO V t8199 9 EPAMROOCKf

t
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 17-1800

Filed January 9, 2019

JOHN NELL MITCHELL,

Applicant-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF IOWA,

Respondent-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Henry W. Latham II, 

Judge.

An applicant appeals from the summary dismissal of his application for 

postconviction relief. AFFIRMED.

Eric D. Tindal of Keegan Farnsworth & Tindal, Iowa City, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Aaron Rogers, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee State.

Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Vaitheswaran and McDonald, JJ.
2

McDONALD, Judge.

At issue in this appeal is whether the district court erred in summarily 

dismissing as time-barred John Mitchell’s third application for postconviction relief. 

We conclude it did not. In 2002, Mitchell was convicted of three counts of sexual 

abuse in the second degree and sentenced to seventy years’ incarceration. The 

supreme court affirmed his convictions on direct appeal. See State v. Mitchell, 670 

N.W.2d 416, 425 (Iowa 2003). In 2013, this court affirmed the denial of Mitchell’s 

second application for postconviction relief. See Mitchell v. State, No. 09-0610, 

2013 WL 750121, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Feb. 27, 2013). The application at issue in 

this appeal was filed in May 2016, almost thirteen years after procedendo issued 

on direct appeal. There is no disputed issue of fact that would bring the case within 

the three-year statute of limitations. See Iowa Code §822.3 (2016). We affirm the 

judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit      32.1**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                          |                                       |                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                                                          |                                       |
|                                                                     |                                  |                                  |
| Date:                    August                    2,                    2006 | By:                              | /s/ Wang                  Qiong  |
|                                                                          | Wang                  Qiong                |
|                                                                          | Chief                    Executive Officer |

----