alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| I, Scott B. Paul, certify that: |
|---------------------------------|

|                |   |   |   |                                  |
|---------------------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| Date: July 29, 2010 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Scott B. Paul                     |
|                |   |   |   | Scott B. Paul                         |
|                |   |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                |   |   |   | ( Principal Executive Officer )       |

| * | Paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of the form of certification are omitted because this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A does not include the information as to which such paragraphs relate. |
|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### WATSON v. STATE.

No. 23244.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 5, 1945.

Robert F. Salmon, of Linden, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

This case was tried in the District Court of Marion County which has jurisdiction to try misdemeanor cases. It is noted that the court adjourned on June 26, 1945. The appeal bond was dated and approved June 22, 1945, and filed with the clerk on June 25th, all before the adjournment of court.

In order to perfect the appeal appellant should have entered into proper recognizance. In the state of the record we have no jurisdiction of the case. Vernon’s, Ann.C.C.P. arts. 829 and 830, and citations thereunder; Bianchi v. State, Tex.Crim. App., 149 S.W.2d 590, - ■ • .

. The appeal is dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27302]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-830]


Coumarin From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Extension 
of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit for preliminary results of 
antidumping duty administrative review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 24, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Hoadley, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-0666.

The Applicable Statute

    Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (the Act), are to the provisions effective January 1, 
1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Act by the 
Uruguay Round Agreements Act. In addition, unless otherwise indicated, 
all citations to the Department's regulations are to 19 CFR part 351 
(1999).

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results

    On February 9, 1995, the Department of Commerce published an 
antidumping duty order on coumarin from the People's Republic of China 
(60 FR 7751). The Department received requests to conduct an 
administrative review of this antidumping duty order. The review was 
initiated on March 30, 2000 for Jiangsu Native Produce Import & Export 
Corp. (Jiangsu) at the request of petitioner (65 FR 16875), and on June 
2, 2000 for Netchem Inc. (Netchem) at the request of Netchem (65 FR 
35320). On July 31, 2000, Jiangsu submitted a letter to the Department 
stating that it would no longer participate in the review. This 
antidumping duty administrative review covers the period of February 1, 
1999 through January 31, 2000.
    Because of the complexity of certain issues, it is not practicable 
to complete this review within the time limit mandated by section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Therefore, in accordance with that section, 
the Department is extending the time limit for the preliminary results 
to no later than February 28, 2001 (See Memorandum from Barbara E. 
Tillman to Joseph A. Spetrini, Extension of Time Limit, October 12, 
2000).

    Dated: October 13, 2000.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 00-27302 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### HEARD v. STATE.

No. 25062.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 11, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction was for felony theft, punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in. the penitentiary.

*855Appellant perfected his appeal to this court. He now files his personal affidavit advising that he does not further desire to. prosecute the appeal, but desires to accept the sentence of the court.

At his request, the appeal is dismissed.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28288
(704) 374-6787

LOGO FIRST UNION





                        MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION REGARDING

                   COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS

As of and for the year ended December 3l, 1997, First Union Mortgage Corporation
has complied in all material respects with the minimum  servicing  standards set
forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's UNFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION
PROGRAM  FOR  MORTGAGE  BANKERS.  As of and for this same  period,  First  Union
Mortgage  Corporation  had if effect a fidelity  bond and  errors and  omissions
policies in the amounts of $100 million and $20 million, respectively.

/s/ Karin Patrick
/Karin Patrick, Senior Vice President                          March 13, 1998
                                                               Date

/s/ James Maynor
James Maynor, President                                        March 13,1998
                                                               Date
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10331

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JASON DAVON LAURENSON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:18-CR-6-38

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jason Davon Laurenson has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Laurenson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 14, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-10331 Document: 00515199006 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/14/2019
No. 19-10331

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-10331 Document: 00515199006 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/14/2019
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We have issued our report dated February 13, 2004, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedules included in the Annual Report of
Horizon Medical Products, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of Horizon Medical Products, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No.
333-110876, effective December 10, 2003) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-99863,
effective September 20, 2002).


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 29, 2004
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION**



**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the quarterly report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2003 to be filed
with Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Douglas P. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.

|Date: April 11, 2003 | By: | s/ Douglas P. Taylor   
|-------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                     |     | Douglas P. Taylor,     
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer
#### HARRY R. SCHUH *v.*COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES

*Norman B. Teague,*in support of the petition.

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 547 (AC 17236), is denied.

*925
      *Alan N. Ponanski,*assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided July 16, 1998
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3277 

To prohibit United States voluntary contributions to the regular budget of 

the United Nations or any United Nations agency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2013 

Mr. KINGSTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit United States voluntary contributions to the 

regular budget of the United Nations or any United 

Nations agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON UNITED STATES VOLUNTARY 

4 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE UNITED NATIONS 

5 AND UNITED NATIONS AGENCIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—No funds made available to any 

7 Federal department or agency may be used to make 

8 United States voluntary contributions to the regular budg9 et of the United Nations or any United Nations agency. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3277 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) applies with 

2 respect to funds made available for fiscal year 2014 and 

3 subsequent fiscal years. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.02

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Michael Walsh, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of IQ Biometrix,
Inc;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual
Report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

            c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

      5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.


                                                     /s/ Michael Walsh
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Michael Walsh,
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 31, 2004
Exhibit
10.4


 


January 24, 2006


 


VIA HAND DELIVERY


 


Dear John,


 


This letter agreement between you and Websense, Inc. (the “Company”)
confirms an amendment to the terms of your employment agreement of May 10,
1999, between you and the Company (the “Employment Agreement”).  Under this letter agreement, a new paragraph “(m)”
is hereby added to Section 4 of the Employment Agreement which paragraph
reads as follows:


 


“(m)                         Notwithstanding
the foregoing, if the Company determines that any cash severance payment benefit
payable to you fails to satisfy the distribution requirement of Section 409A(a)(2)(A) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), as a result of Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of
the Code, then the payment schedule will be modified as follows:  If acceleration of the benefit will avoid
application of Section 409(a)(1) of the Code, then the Company will
accelerate the payment of the benefit to the minimum extent necessary so that
the benefit is not subject to the provisions of Section 409A(a)(1) of
the Code.  If acceleration of the benefit
would not avoid the application of Section 409A(a)(1) of the Code,
however, then the Company will delay the benefit to the minimum extent
necessary so that the benefit is not subject to the provisions of Section 409A(a)(1) of
the Code.  If any payments are delayed as
a result of the previous sentence, all such delayed payments shall become
payable in a lump sum on the first day they can be paid following the
termination date.  Thereafter, payments
will resume in accordance with the payment schedule set forth in this
letter.  The Board may attach conditions
to or adjust the severance amounts paid to preserve, as closely as possible,
the economic consequences that would have applied in the absence of these requirements;
provided, however, that no such
condition or adjustment shall result in the payments being subject to Section 409A(a)(1) of
the Code.”


 


If this amendment of the Employment Agreement is acceptable to you,
please sign below and return one original to me.


 


Sincerely,


 


 


Gene Hodges


President and Chief Executive Officer


 


AGREED:


 


	
  Date:

  	
  January 24, 2006

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  John
  Carrington
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                              256,884
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     2,521,146
<ALLOWANCES>                      1,166,321
<INVENTORY>                         211,231
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,481,384
<PP&E>                              962,091
<DEPRECIATION>                      338,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    3,735,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             3,539,929
<BONDS>                             200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               1
<COMMON>                             62,133
<OTHER-SE>                          (66,546)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      3,735,517
<SALES>                           1,004,117
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  1,004,117
<CGS>                               220,288
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       220,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   43,469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (1,156,275)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,156,275)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (1,156,275)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.20)
        


</TABLE>
#### H. J. LETTERMAN v. STATE.

No. 22516.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 19, 1943.

Eugene F. Mathis, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a fine of one thousand dollars for violation of the liquor law.

This is a companion case to Letterman v. State, Tex.Cr.R., 171 S.W.2d 349; and reference is here had to that opinion for a discussion of facts and reason for our conclusion.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.1

HAROLD Y. SPECTOR, CPA        SPECTOR & WONG, LLP           80 SOUTH LAKE AVENUE
CAROL S. WONG, CPA       CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS                  SUITE 723
                                (888) 584-5577        PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91101
                                FAX (626) 584-6447
                            spectorwongcpa@aol.com






            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTRERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT FIRM


     We hereby  consent to the  inclusion  in this annual  report on Form 10-KSB
under the caption  "Experts",  the  reference to our report dated March 30, 2006
with respect to the Consolidated  Financial Statements of Circle Group Holdings,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.





/s/ Spector & Wong, LLP
----------------------------
Spector & Wong, LLP
Pasadena, California
March 31, 2006
Exhibit ‘D’

Subject to Protective Order. Provided to Court for in camera review pursuant to 

Order. 

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 118-5 Filed 11/04/22 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.2

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

      I, Stephen P. Rolf, the Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Marlton
Technologies, Inc.

      2. Based upon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of
      an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most t 6 0 recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

      (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.


Dated: May 13, 2005


/s/ Stephen P. Rolf
-----------------------------
      Stephen P. Rolf
      Chief Financial Officer