IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 19-1041

Filed October 9, 2019

IN THE INTEREST OF J.G. and A.G.,

Minor Children,

C.G., Mother,

Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Winnebago County, Karen Kaufman 

Salic, District Associate Judge.

A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights to her children. 

AFFIRMED.

Jane M. Wright, Forest City, for appellant mother.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Kathryn K. Lang, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee State.

Carrie Jean Rodriguez of Garland & Rodriguez, Garner, attorney and 

guardian ad litem for minor children.

Considered by Tabor, P.J., and Mullins and May, JJ.
2

MAY, Judge.

This case focuses on two children, A.G., born April 2009, and J.G., born 

October 2018. But we must first discuss a previous termination that occurred 

before either A.G. or J.G. were born. In 2007, the mother voluntarily agreed to 

termination of her parental rights to her oldest child. Concerns in that case 

included the mother’s substance abuse. 

Fast-forward to October 2018. Just a week after giving birth to J.G., the 

mother suffered an overdose of methamphetamine while traveling in a vehicle with 

A.G. and J.G. She was hospitalized for more than a week. The children were 

placed in foster care.

Although numerous services were provided to the mother, she has shown 

little progress. She missed multiple drug tests. And she failed to maintain 

consistent visitation and contact with her children. Ultimately, the juvenile court 

terminated the mother’s rights under Iowa Code section 232.116(1)(g) (2019) as 

to A.G. and Iowa Code section 232.116(1)(h) as to J.G.1 The mother appeals.2

The mother does not raise any claims under our traditional three-part 

analysis. See In re A.S., 906 N.W.2d 467, 472–73 (Iowa 2018). Instead, she 

argues: (1) Iowa Code section 232.116(1)(g) violates her constitutional rights 

because it treats prior terminations from Iowa courts differently from those from 

other jurisdictions, (2) the State may not admit a prior termination order unless the 

 

1 The mother does not raise any claims pertaining to Iowa Code section 232.116(1)(h). 

We find she has waived any claim concerning J.G.

2 The father was originally a party to this case but is now deceased. His parental rights 

are not at issue in this appeal.
3

court takes judicial notice of the prior termination record,

3 and (3) A.G. must be 

removed from the mother’s care for one year before the State may pursue 

termination. But the mother provides no authority to support her claims. So we 

find she has waived them. See Iowa R. App. P. 6.903(2)(g)(3) (“Failure to cite 

authority in support of an issue may be deemed waiver of that issue.”); In re 

Marriage of Oswalt-Weiler, No. 18-1899, 2019 WL 3317345, at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. 

July 24, 2019) (finding the appellant waived his claim on inadmissible evidence by 

failing to provide any authority in support).

We find no grounds for reversal. And we affirm without further opinion. See 

Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(1)(e).

AFFIRMED.

 

3 We note the mother cites In re J.E., No. 15-0187, 2016 WL 2753774 (Iowa Ct. App. May 

11, 2016) in support of this claim. But we find this case is not relevant. J.E. held it was 

improper for the juvenile court to take judicial notice of a dissolution-of-marriage file

without the agreement of the parties. Id. at *6–7. In this case, however, the juvenile court 

did not take judicial notice. So J.E. does not apply.