alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.2
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I,
Tammy-Lynn McNabb, certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Vitasti,
Inc.
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:
April 15, 2005     /s/
Tammy-Lynn McNabb _______________________
 Tammy-Lynn
McNabb, Chief Financial Officer
### Served: January 30, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 30 th of January , 2012

Essential Air Service at

ALPENA, MICHIGAN

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq

. DOCKET DOT

- OST

- 200 9

- 0300

NOTICE OF EXTENSION

By Order 201 2

- 1

- 6

, January 10, 2012 , we re

- solicited proposals for Essential Air Service ( EAS ) at Alpena, Michigan, no later than J anuary 31 , 201 2

. On January 30, the City of Alpena reque sted an extension of the deadline, indicating that the city council and newly elected Mayor had not been sufficiently involved in the process. The Mayor indicated that “Any amount of time you can afford us would give me time to ensure that I have done

eve rything I can for our community.”

We recognize the importance the community places on this issue, and thus will grant a two

week extension , i.e., to Feburary 14, 2012

. However, we note that the initial request for proposals, Order 2011

- 9

- 5, was issued on September 13, 2011, and the Department has a duty to relieve the incumbent, Pinnacle Airlines Corporation, d/b/a Delta Connection, of its

forced

- service obligation.

Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis

An electronic version of this do cument is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.regulations.gov
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3114 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the increase in 

the income threshold used in determining the deduction for medical care. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 

Mr. BARBER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the increase in the income threshold used in determining 

the deduction for medical care. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Families and 

5 Seniors Save on Health Care Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INCREASE IN INCOME THRESHOLD FOR 

7 DETERMINING MEDICAL CARE DEDUCTION. 

8 Section 9013 of the Patient Protection and Afford9 able Care Act (and the amendments made by such section) 

10 are hereby repealed, and the Internal Revenue Code of 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3114 IH

1 1986 shall be applied and administered as if such section 

2 (and amendments) had not been enacted. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
      32











CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of The Bombay Company, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 5, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
      of
      the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their
      knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

















/S/
      DAVID B. STEWART  /S/
      ELAINE D. CROWLEY


David
      B.
      Stewart Elaine
      D.
      Crowley


Chief
      Executive Officer            
Senior
      Vice
      President, CFO and


Treasurer





Dated:
      June 14, 2007    Dated: June 14, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 210 (Monday, October 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27761]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Notice of Open Special Meeting of the Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory 
Committee of the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Export-Import 
Bank)

SUMMARY: The Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee was established by 
Pub. L. 105-121, November 26, 1997, to advise the Board of Directors on 
the development and implementation of policies and programs designed to 
support the expansion of the Bank's financial commitments in Sub-
Saharan Africa under the loan, guarantee and insurance programs of the 
Bank. Further, the committee shall make recommendations on how the Bank 
can facilitate greater support by U.S. commercial banks for trade with 
Sub-Saharan Africa.

Time and Place: Wednesday, November 15, 2000, at 9:30 a.m. to 12:30 
p.m. The meeting will be held at the Export-Import Bank in Room 1143, 
811 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20571.

Agenda: This meeting will include a review of Export-Import Bank 
activities in sub-Sahara Africa.

Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public participation, 
and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral questions or 
comments. Members of the public may also file written statement(s) 
before or after the meeting. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such 
as a sign language interpreter) or other special accommodations, please 
contact, prior to November 10, 2000, Teri Stumpf, Room 1215, Vermont 
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20571, Voice: (202) 565-3502 or TDD (202) 
565-3377.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact Teri 
Stumpf, Room 1215, 811 Vermont Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20571, (202) 
565-3502.

John M. Niehuss,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-27761 Filed 10-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-1941

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Andrew Spotted Elk

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of South Dakota - Pierre

____________

 Submitted: August 19, 2015

Filed: August 24, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Andrew Spotted Elk directly appeals the sentence that the district court

1

imposed upon revoking his supervised release, arguing that his six-month prison

The HonorableRoberto A. Lange, United States DistrictJudge for the District 1

of South Dakota.
sentence is substantively unreasonable. Upon careful review, see United States v.

Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009) (appellate review of revocation

sentence), we conclude that the within-Guidelines-range sentence is not substantively

unreasonable, see United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009). We

grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

-2-
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27441]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later thanNovember 20, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Cynthia C. Goodwin, Vice 
President) 104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Southern Community Bancorp, Orlando, Florida; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Southern Community Bank of Southwest 
Florida, Bonita Springs, Florida (in organization).
    2. PAB Bankshares, Inc., Valdosta, Georgia; to acquire 100 percent 
of the voting shares of Friendship Community Bank, Ocala, Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 20, 
2000.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-27441 Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon, United States District Judge for

the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

CHRISTOPHER BLAINE CAREY,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 04-50266

D.C. No. CR-02-00248-TJH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Terry J. Hatter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 11, 2009** 

Pasadena, California

Before: HALL and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and CONLON, *** District

Judge.

FILED

DEC 15 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Appellant Christopher Blaine Carey appeals (1) the denial of his motion to

suppress evidence of child pornography and (2) the imposition of certain

conditions as part of his supervised release. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

Carey brought his computer to a repair shop in Claremont, CA to fix a

floppy disk drive, and the technician found child pornography while working on

the computer. The technician contacted the Claremont Police Department and

showed an officer images from the computer, upon which the officer obtained a

warrant to search the computer and defendant’s residence. Carey sought to

suppress evidence procured from these searches due to violation of his Fourth

Amendment rights.

The technician's search of Carey's hard drive was a private search that did

not implicate the protections of the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Sherwin,

539 F.2d 1, 5 (9th Cir. 1976). No governmental actors were present during the

search. There were no agreements between the repair shop and the police

department, and there is nothing to indicate that the technician initially searched

Carey's computer with the intent to aid law enforcement. The government's

subsequent involvement did not change the private nature of the search, and Carey

has not shown that the government’s search expanded beyond the technician’s

search prior to the issuance of a warrant. United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109
(1984); United States v. Young, 153 F.3d 1079, 1080 (9th Cir. 1998) (“A defendant

challenging a search conducted by a private party bears the burden of showing the

search was governmental action.”). 

Because the technician’s search was a private search that did not implicate

the Fourth Amendment, we do not reach the issue of whether Carey had a

reasonable expectation of privacy in the computer folders searched by the

technician.

Carey has already completed his term of imprisonment and supervised

release, mooting his challenge to the conditions of his supervised release. United

States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121 (9th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5427 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men’s footwear. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. HUELSKAMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men’s footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN’S FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Other footwear with outer 

soles and uppers of rubber 

or plastics, the foregoing 

for men, other than house 

slippers, work footwear, 

tennis shoes, basketball 

shoes, gym shoes, training 

shoes, and the like (provided for in subheading 

6402.99.31) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5427 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2 SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp. (the Company) hereby
certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December
31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (subject to the Companys position prevailing in regard to the
unresolved SEC comment, as more fully described in the Report); and

(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March
2, 2009

|                                                       |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|By: /s/
THOMAS J. STIRNWEIS                           
|                                                       |  | 
|Thomas J.
 Stirnweis                                  
|Vice
 President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.

---
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust IV and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended December 26, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John J. Fosina, Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General
Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ JOHN J. FOSINA
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    John J. Fosina *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: March 22, 2004
_____________________

*  John J. Fosina functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
#### Lee W. PADGETT, Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Appellee.

No. 75-1417.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 9, 1975.

Decided Sept. 22, 1976.

*705Thomas P. Mains, Jr., Alexandria, Va., Philip S. Marstiller, Richmond, Va. (Archie 0. Wells, Richmond, Va., on brief), for appellant.

Thomas G. Slater, Jr., Richmond, Va. (E. Milton Farley, III, James E. Farnham, Jack E. McClard, Hunton, Williams, Gay & Gibson, Richmond, Va., on brief), for appellee.

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS, Senior District Judge.*

*

 United States District Court for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Lee Padgett appeals from a jury verdict in favor of General Motors in his products liability action. Padgett alleged that because of defects in the engine restraining system of the 1969 Chevrolet in which he was a passenger, the Chevrolet went out of control and ran into a utility pole, rendering him a permanent paraplegic. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

Padgett has assigned as error, among other claims, that the trial court refused to permit the introduction into evidence of entire depositions, and admitted evidence of drinking by Padgett and Stockner (the driver) prior to the accident.

General Motors denies that it actually introduced part of the deposition into evidence, and argues that FRCP 32(a)(4) does not apply to permit the introduction of the entire document. We need not reach this question because we find that the court’s ruling did not prejudice Padgett, as he was free to explain on recall his prior statements in the deposition. He was also free to recall Stockner for the same purpose. Had this procedure been followed, he could have laid the foundation for any further testimony based on facts different from those assumed by General Motors.

Evidence adduced at trial showed that Padgett and Stockner had consumed some alcoholic beverages within four hours before the accident. As this evidence of drinking could have been relevant to the perceptive abilities of Padgett and Stockner, both of whom testified about the accident at trial, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting this evidence. See *Myers v. Sutton,*213 Va. 59, 60-61, 189 S.E.2d 336 (1972).

We have examined the other claims and find they do not constitute reversible error. The judgment of the district court is accordingly

*AFFIRMED.*