alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certifications Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report (the Report) of Precision Aerospace Components, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Andrew S. Prince, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |  |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





| |  |  | /s/  Andrew S. Prince
Andrew S. Prince             
| |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------
| |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





Date:  September 21, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64275-64276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27575]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Implementation of Tariff-Rate Quota for Imports of Beef

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is 
providing notice that USTR has determined that New Zealand, pursuant to 
its request, is a participating country for purposes of the export 
certification program for imports of beef under the tariff-rate quota.

DATES: The action is effective January 1, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suchada Langley, Senior Economist for 
Agricultural Affairs, Office of the United States Trade Representative, 
600 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20508; telephone: (202) 395-6127.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States maintains a tariff-rate 
quota on imports of beef as part of its implementation of the Marrakesh 
Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. The in-quota 
quantity of that tariff-rate quota is allocated in part among a number 
of countries. As part of the administration of that tariff-rate quota, 
USTR provided, in 15 CFR part 2012, for the use of export certificates 
with respect to imports of beef from countries that have an allocation 
of the in-quota quantity. The export certificates apply only to those 
countries that USTR determines are participating countries for purposes 
of 15 CFR part 2012.
    On September 26, 2000, USTR received a request and the necessary 
supporting information from the government of New Zealand to be 
considered as a participating country for purposes of the export 
certification program. Accordingly, USTR has determined that, effective 
January 1, 2001, New Zealand is a participating country for purposes of 
15 CFR part 2012. As a result, effective on and after January 1, 2001, 
imports of beef from New Zealand will need to be accompanied by an 
export certificate in order to qualify for the in-quota tariff rate. 
However, imports exported from New Zealand prior to January 1, 2001, 
including exports currently warehoused, will not require an export 
certificate. In order for the export certificate to be valid, it has to 
be used

[[Page 64276]]

in the calendar year for which it is in effect.

Charlen Barshefsky,
United States Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 00-27575 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
#### FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF ROCHESTER, ROCHESTER, NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dr. William R. FISHER, Individually, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 76-2495

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 3, 1977.

Robert A. Eisner, Ronald A. Matamoros, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellants. James R. Paulk, Jr., Alfred Adams, Jr.,

H. Edward Hales, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GODBOLD, RONEY and FAY, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5 Cir., see *Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, et al., 5*Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants question the decision of the district court permitting, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 69, post-judgment discovery in aid of execution of a judgment against them. We affirm on the basis of the opinion of the district court. 422 F.Supp. 1 (N.D.Ga., 1976).

However, one matter on appeal needs to be clarified and disposed of. Appellants contend that the district court interpreted Georgia’s testimonial privilege statute, Ga. Code.Ann. § 38-1205,1 to require that a person’s testimony must both incriminate him and work a forfeiture of his estate before this privilege may be invoked. This is plainly not what the district court said or meant. The district court said that the cases relied on by appellants were based on the privilege against self-incrimination and, because of the policy and constitutional ramifications of this privilege, were of little value in deciding questions involving forfeiture of estate privilege, which is grounded on different considerations. The district court then addressed the forfeiture of estate privilege directly and found that it did not apply. Thus, appellants’ reading of the district court opinion is erroneous, and their contentions based on this faulty reading are without merit.2

AFFIRMED.

1

. “No party shall be required to testify as to any matter which may criminate or tend to criminate himself, or which shall tend to work a forfeiture of his estate, or which shall tend to bring infamy or disgrace or public contempt upon himself or any member of his family.”

2

. We have considered on our own initiative whether the district court’s order was a final judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. This circuit has held that the *denial*of a motion to compel discovery under Rule 69(a) is appealable. *U. S.*v. *McWhirter,*376 F.2d 102 (CA5, 1967). Two other circuits, however, have dismissed appeals by defendants from orders *compelling*discovery in aid of execution. *Childs v. Kaplan,*467 F.2d 628 (CA8, 1972); *U. S. v. Fabric Garment Co.,*383 F.2d 984 (CA2, 1967). For the purposes of this case, we assume that the order below was appealable.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 210 (Monday, October 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27770]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER98-3382-001]


Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation; Notice of Filing

October 24, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 13, 2000, Rochester Gas and Electric 
Corporation (RG&E), tendered for filing in compliance with the 
Commission's order issued September 12, 1997 in the above-referenced 
proceeding, Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation, 80 FERC para. 
61,284 (1997), an update to the market power study originally submitted 
in support of RG&E's request for market-based rate authority.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or November 3, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Beginning November 1, 2000, comments and protests 
may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web 
site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27770 Filed 10-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
TEDDY SHAWN STOKES

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3104

_____ ________________________/

Opinion filed November 4, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County

. John F. Simon, Jr. , Judge

.

Teddy Shawn Stokes, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lauren L. Gonzalez, A ssistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON , MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
**Exhibit 32(ii)**

****

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350**



In connect with the quarterly
report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended August 31, 2003 to be filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.



|Date: October 13, 2003 | By: | /s/ Mark V. McDonough                     
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                       |     | Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial Officer
#### AYRES v. STATE.

No. 25406.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 24, 1951.

On Rehearing Dec. 12, 1951.

Rehearing Denied Deb. 6, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a conviction for keeping a disorderly house, with punishment assessed at a fine of $200 and twenty days in jail.

The affidavit or complaint upon which the information is predicated states only that the affiant has “good reason to believe” that the offense was committed. Nowhere does the affiant state that she “does believe.”

•Such a complaint is fatally defective and will not support a valid information.

The judgment is reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

On State’s Motion for Rehearing

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

ft is shown by supplemental transcript that the complaint filed in the trial court is regular on its face and states that the affiant “has reason to believe and does believe” that the offense was committed.

Appellant pleaded guilty to the charge, and her punishment is that fixed by law for the offense charged.

There are no bills of exception and nothing is presented for review.

The state’s motion for rehearing is granted, the order reversing the conviction and dismissing the prosecution is set aside, and the judgment is now affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

*707On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing

MORRISON, Judge.

Appellant complains that the judgment is defective in that she was found guilty of “disorderly house” and asks for a reversal on this ground.

In compliance with Article 847, C.C.P., we now reform the judgment to read “keeping a disorderly house”.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.
# Contents

Data 1

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngc2d.htm

U.S. Energy Information Administration

infoctr@eia.doe.gov

# Data 1

Back to Contents
29	May	2015

John	Riegel

2007	Lexington	Drive

Fullerton,	CA	92835

Cell:	714-553-3446

e-mail:	jeriegel@riegelproperties.com

U.S.	Department	of	Transportation,	Docket	Operations

West	Building	Ground	Floor,	Room	W12-140

1200	New	Jersey	Avenue,	SE

Washington,	DC	20590

Exemption	Request	Section	333	of	the	FAA	Reform	Act	of	2012

Dear	FAA	Administrator,

I,	John	Riegel,	am	requesting	a	COA	for	flights	at	or	below	200	feet	AGL	for	my	DJI	

Phantom	3	Professional	UAS.		This	aircraft	is	1280	grams	(2.8	pounds),	will	be	flown	

during	daytime	under	VFR	conditions	and	operate	within	VLOS	of	the	pilot(s).		The	

specifications	are	shown	below.

The	location	of	flight	for	the	exemption	request	is	a	Mobile	Home	Park	my	family	

owns	in	Barstow,	CA.		Our	property	is more	that	10	NM	from	an	airport.		I	wish	

approval	to	take	still	and	video	photography	of	mobile	homes	in	our	park	offered	for	

sale	or	for	rent.		All	home	sites	are	on	our	property, while most	of	the	homes	offered	

for	sale	or	rent	we	currently	own.		The	photographs	and	video	will	be	used	in	

marketing	brochures	and	web	site	advertising.		I	plan	on	photographing	at	about	30	

to	50	feet	AGL.

I	am	a	soloed	Student	Pilot	and	have	finished	my	required	VFR	Ground	School.		

I	am	familiar	with	preflight	planning	and inspections	as	well	as	FAA	VFR	flight	rules.

Thank	you,	

John	Riegel
Specifications for DJI Phantom 3 Professional:

Aircraft 

Weight (Battery & Propellers Included) 1280 g 

Max. Ascent Speed 5 m/s 

Max. Descent Speed 3 m/s 

Max. Speed 16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind) 

Max. Flight Altitude 6000 m 

Max. Flight Time Approximately 23 minutes 

Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C 

GPS Mode GPS/GLONASS 

Gimbal 

Controllable Range Pitch: - 90° to + 30°
#### Rothstein, to use, Appellant, *v.*Jefferson Ice Mfg. Co.

*299Argued October 3, 1939.

Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Parker, Rhodes and Hirt, JJ.

*310November 15, 1939:

*Ned Stein,*for appellant.

*Robert B. Ely, Sd,*with him *Buckman & Buckman,*for appellee.

Pee Curiam,

A review of the record in this case satisfies us that no error was committed by the court below in dismissing the exceptions filed by the appellant to the findings of fact and conclusions of law and. the rulings of President Judge Finletter, sitting as Chancellor, and entering the final decree appealed from.

The decree is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant, on the findings of fact, conclusions of law and discussion of the Chancellor.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3267 

Eliminating the debt ceiling for a period defined, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 5, 2013 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

Eliminating the debt ceiling for a period defined, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal Sanity Act for 

5 the National Debt’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NONAPPLICABILITY OF DEBT CEILING. 

7 Section 3101(b) of title 31, United States Code, shall 

8 not apply for the period beginning on the date of the en9 actment of this Act and ending 270 days thereafter. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
exv10w31



 








Exhibit
10.31




AMENDMENT ONE

TO THE

CASH AMERICA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

2004 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN




     By action of the Board of Directors of Cash America International, Inc. (the “Company”) on
January 25, 2006, the Cash America International, Inc. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)
is hereby amended as follows:


1. Section 12(b)(iii) of the Plan is amended by removing the second, third and fourth sentences,
which permit a Director to elect to receive lump sum distributions of directors fees deferred under
the Plan in the form of cash rather than Company Common Stock, and by removing a reference to cash
distributions in the next-to-last sentence. As amended, such Section shall read as follows:





(iii) If the Outside Director elects to receive a lump sum distribution, the trustee of the
trust shall distribute such shares of common stock free of restrictions within 60 days after
the Outside Director’s termination Date or a later date elected by the Outside Director (no
later than the mandatory retirement age of the Outside Director). If an Outside Director
elects to receive payments in installments, the distribution shall commence within 60 days
after the Outside Director’s termination date and will be made in shares of common stock.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, any fractional shares of common
stock shall be distributed in cash to the Outside Director.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CASH AMERICA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

 	 
	 	BY:      /s/  Curtis Linscott
 	 
	 	J. Curtis Linscott, Vice President, General Counsel 	 
	 	and Secretary
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF CHERRY, BEKAERT & HOLLAND, L.L.P.

The Board of Directors
Citizens South Banking Corporation

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-103218) and the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-77657) of Citizens South Banking
Corporation of our report dated February 5, 2003, relating to the consolidated
statements of condition, operations, comprehensive income, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and for
the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, the three month period ended
December 31, 2000 and the year ended September 30, 2000, which is included in
the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Citizens South Banking
Corporation.

/s/ Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.

Gastonia, North Carolina
March 26, 2003


                                       90
Exhibit
32.2





Statement
of Chief Financial Officer Furnished


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is
the Chief Financial Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the
“Company”).





This statement is being furnished in
connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”).





By execution of this statement, I
certify that:





A)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))
      and





B)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
  Report.





March 16, 2009
              
              /s/ Gary F. HoskinsDated
              
              Gary
      F. HoskinsChief
      Financial Officer





This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001051828
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000



<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                   485,189
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               485,189
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 485,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    412,372
<COMMON>                                        72,817
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   485,189
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,428
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,428
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,428
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,428
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.01

ASYMETRIX SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

SUBSIDIARY NAME                                   JURISDICTION            DOING BUSINESS NAME
------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------------------------------
<S>                                               <C>                     <C>
click2learn.com, limited                          United Kingdom          click2learn.com, limited
Asymetrix SARL                                    France                  No current business
Socha Computing, Inc.                             Washington              No current business
Aimtech Corporation                               Delaware                No current business
Communication Strategies, Inc.                    Texas                   click2learn.com Placement Services
Meliora Systems, Inc.                             New York                No current business
Pixelmedia Visual Communications, Inc.            British Columbia        Pixelmedia Visual Communications, Inc.
Click2learn Software Corp.                        Delaware                No current business

</TABLE>
-78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 39

 40

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/24

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 24 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

★ ■

■ ■

■

★

●

●

●

★

●

● ●

●