Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 54 / Monday, March 22, 2010 / Notices 13523 

Invitational priority: Under an 

invitational priority, we are particularly 

interested in applications that meet the 

priority. However, we do not give an 

application that meets the priority a 

preference over other applications (34 

CFR 75.105(c)(1)). 

Final Priority: We will announce the 

final priority in a notice in the Federal 

Register. We will determine the final 

priority after considering responses to 

this notice and other information 

available to the Department. This notice 

does not preclude us from proposing 

additional priorities, requirements, 

definitions, or selection criteria, subject 

to meeting applicable rulemaking 

requirements. 

Note: This notice does not solicit 

applications. In any year in which we choose 

to use this priority, we invite applications 

through a notice in the Federal Register. 

Executive Order 12866: Under 

Executive Order 12866, we have 

assessed the potential costs and benefits 

of this regulatory action and have 

determined that it is not ‘‘significant’’ 

under the terms of that Executive order. 

We have determined, also, that this 

proposed regulatory action does not 

unduly interfere with State, local, and 

Tribal governments in the exercise of 

their governmental functions. 

Intergovernmental Review: This 

program is subject to Executive Order 

12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR 

part 79. One of the objectives of the 

Executive order is to foster an 

intergovernmental partnership and a 

strengthened federalism. The Executive 

order relies on processes developed by 

State and local governments for 

coordination and review of proposed 

Federal financial assistance. 

This document provides early 

notification of our specific plans and 

actions for this program. 

Accessible Format: Individuals with 

disabilities can obtain this document in 

an accessible format (e.g., braille, large 

print, audiotape, or computer diskette) 

on request to the program contact 

person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. 

Electronic Access to This Document: 

You can view this document, as well as 

all other documents of this Department 

published in the Federal Register, in 

text or Adobe Portable Document 

Format (PDF) on the Internet at the 

following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/ 

fedregister. To use PDF you must have 

Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is 

available free at this site. 

Note: The official version of this document 

is the document published in the Federal 

Register. Free Internet access to the official 

edition of the Federal Register and the Code 

of Federal Regulations is available on GPO 

Access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ 

index.html. 

Dated: March 17, 2010. 

Alexa Posny, 

Assistant Secretary for Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services. 

[FR Doc. 2010–6229 Filed 3–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Office of Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services Overview 

Information; Migrant and Seasonal 

Farmworkers Program 

Correction 

In notice document 2010–5976 

beginning on page 13106 in the issue of 

Thursday, March 18, 2010 make the 

following correction: 

On page 13106, in the second column, 

under the Applications Available: 

heading, in the first line, ‘‘April 2, 2010’’ 

should read ‘‘March 18, 2010’’. 

[FR Doc. C1–2010–5976 Filed 3–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. RM07–10–002] 

Transparency Provisions of Section 23 

of the Natural Gas Act; Notice of the 

Agenda for Form No. 552 Technical 

Conference 

March 15, 2010. 

In a ‘‘Notice of Technical Conference’’ 

issued on February 22, 2010 in the 

above-referenced proceeding, the 

Commission stated that this conference, 

to be held on March 25, 2010, will 

address select issues identified by staff. 

Those issues include: (1) 

Inconsistencies in reporting upstream 

transactions in the natural gas supply 

chain on Form No. 552, and whether 

these transactions contribute to 

wholesale price formation; (2) whether 

transactions involving balancing, cashout, operational, and in-kind 

transactions should be reported on Form 

No. 552; and (3) whether the units of 

measurement (TBtu) currently used for 

reporting volumes in the form are 

appropriate. The Agenda for this 

Technical Conference is attached to this 

notice. 

Specific questions to each panel are 

on the attached Agenda. Each panelist 

will be given the opportunity to provide 

a brief introductory statement on these 

questions. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

March 25, 2010: Commission Meeting 

Room 

9 a.m.–9:10 a.m.—Opening Remarks. 

9:10 a.m.–10:45 a.m.—Upstream 

transactions in the natural gas supply 

chain. 

1. How has your company addressed 

the reporting of unprocessed gas on 

Form No. 552? 

2. Are there unreported volumes of 

unprocessed physical natural gas 

(between the wellhead and any 

processing plant) that use, contribute to, 

or might they contribute to the 

formation of daily or monthly gas price 

indices? Are the volumes associated 

with these transactions material? 

3. What effect, if any, will the 

development of nontraditional gas 

sources have on the reporting on 

unprocessed gas? 

4. Is the current reporting 

measurement (TBtus) an appropriate 

measurement? Would reporting volumes 

in decatherms be more appropriate? 

Panelists 

• John Poe, Manager, Regulatory 

Affairs, ExxonMobil Gas & Power 

Marketing Company (Natural Gas 

Supply Association). 

• William E. Shanahan, Marketing 

Manager, Chaparral LLC, (Natural Gas & 

Energy Association of Oklahoma). 

• Mary Nelson, Manager, Regulatory 

Affairs, Devon Energy Corp. (Natural 

Gas Supply Association). 

• Katie Rice, Director, Regulatory 

Affairs, DCP Midstream LLC. 

• Representative, Independent 

Producers Association of America. 

10:45 a.m.–11 a.m.—Break 

11 a.m. –12:15 p.m. Cashouts, 

Imbalances and Operational Volumes 

1. How has your company addressed 

the reporting of cashouts, imbalance 

makeup and operational volumes on the 

Form No. 552 in relation to the total 

volumes of physical natural gas 

reported? 

2. Are the volumes associated with 

these transactions material? Please 

quantify. 

3. Is the current reporting 

measurement (TBtus) an appropriate 

measurement? Would reporting volumes 

in decatherms be more appropriate? 

Panelists 

• Scott Brewer, Director, North 

American Energy, Terra Industries, Inc. 

(Process Gas Consumers). 

• Katie Rice, Director, Regulatory 

Affairs, DCP Midstream LLC. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES