alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-1801

LT Case No. 2008-CF-1656-B

_____________________________

NEMEA HALL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.850 from the Circuit Court for Lake County.

Larry Metz, Judge.

Nemea Hall, Daytona Beach, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney 

Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee.

October 13, 2023

PER CURIAM.

This Court previously affirmed the denial of Appellant’s first 

petition for writ of habeas corpus stemming from Lake County 

Circuit Court Case No. 2008-CF-1656-B. This is Appellant’s 

second attempt at a writ of habeas corpus stemming from the same 

case mentioned above. Because it appears that Appellant’s filings 

are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is 
2

cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting 

claims stemming from Lake County Circuit Court Case No. 2008-

CF-1656-B, may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing 

in this Court. State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

AFFIRMED; APPELLANT CAUTIONED.

EDWARDS, C.J., and JAY and KILBANE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Description of 2006 Base Salary of Louise M. Parent



 EXHIBIT 10.41 
 Description of 2006 Base Salary of Louise M. Parent, 
 Executive Vice President and General Counsel

 On January 23, 2006, after a review of performance and competitive market data, the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the
Board of Directors of American Express Company increased the annual base salary of Louise M. Parent, the Executive Vice President and General Counsel of the Company, from $440,000 to $500,000.
Calculation for solid fuel mmbtu/hr, note that 13,500 btu/lb is an average value for coal heat content

and served as a constant in the following calculation:

h = h

h ∗ 2000 ∗ 13 , 500 ∗ 1 10 = / h
Calculation for natural gas mmbtu/hr, note that 1.009 mmbtu/MCF is an average value for gas heating to volume ratio and served as a constant in the following calculations:

h = ∗ 60

h ∗ 1 1000 ∗ 1

. 009

= / h

Calculation for emissions lb/mmbtu:

, = , h
h = ,
**EXHIBIT 31(i).1 RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Thomas J. Stirnweis, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Getty Realty Corp.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:March 17, 2008By: /s/ THOMAS J. STIRNWEIS
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of CLP Holdings Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter P. W. Tse, Group Executive Director & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  June 22, 2007



| |  |     |  |                           
| |  | --- |  | --------------------------
| |  |     |  | /s/ Peter P. W. Tse       
| |  | By: |  |                           
| |  |     |  | Peter P. W. Tse           
| |  |     |  | Group Executive Director &
| |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer   



|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 32(i)**

**CERTIFICATION**

******PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350**

In connect with the quarterly
report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended February 28, 2007 to be filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on
or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas P. Taylor, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

|Date: March 29, 2007 | By: | /s/ Douglas P. Taylor                     
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                     |     | Douglas P. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-30221

IBERIA CREDIT BUREAU INCORPORATED, doing business as Information Services; WARDELL X G E R HARDT; ALFRED J. THERIOT; CONSTANCE WHITE LOUVIERE; ELLIOT JOLIET; ET AL, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. TELECORP COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, also known as SunCom, Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(6:01-CV-2148)
Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### We dismiss the appeal f o r w a n t of jurisdiction because it concerns an interlocutory order compelling arbitration for some of the plaintiffs. Such an order to compel arbitration is not a final order or judgment, and the dist rict court did not certify this interlocutory appeal in writing. 28 U

. S .C. § 1292(b). Consequently, the appeal is DISMISSED. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D Sep tem ber 2 6, 2 011 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-30221 Document: 00511612944 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/26/2011
#### BOWARD v. STATE.

No. 26422.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 6, 1953.

*439No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 19, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60270

Summary Calendar

NAFISA ALI,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals

Before GARWOOD, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Nafisa Ali, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions this

court to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(BIA) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying her

application for withholding or removal and relief under the

Convention Against Torture (CAT). Ali argues that she demonstrated

past persecution as a result of her activities in a political
2

party. She also argues that the BIA failed to consider new

evidence on a motion to remand and that the evidence supports her

claim that she suffered persecution.

We conclude from a review of the record that the IJ’s and the

BIA’s determination is supported by substantial evidence, and the

record does not compel a conclusion contrary to the IJ’s and the

BIA’s denial of withholding of removal. See Roy v. Ashcroft, 389

F.3d 132, 138 (5th Cir. 2004); Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906

(5th Cir. 2002); 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(b). Ali has not separately

briefed her claim for relief under the CAT, and that issue is

therefore abandoned. See Roy, 389 F.3d at 138; Rodriguez v. INS,

9 F.3d 408, 414 n.15 (5th Cir. 1993).

Ali (who has been represented by counsel throughout these

proceedings) did not file a motion to remand (or to reopen) before

the BIA as required by its rules; she merely included in her BIA

brief, as an additional argument in support of her contention that

she was entitled to withholding of removal, a reference to

assertedly changed circumstances in Pakistan and allegedly

supporting news articles and web page postings attached to that

brief, most of which well predated the hearing before the IJ and

none of which tended to undermine the IJ’s findings that she had

not suffered past persecution, that it was not likely that she

would be persecuted on return to Pakistan (as her only political

involvement had been minor and low level and she had not been
3

politically active in any way for over eight years when she was

only 20 years old); and that in any event she could avoid any such

claimed danger by relocating within Pakistan. All this material

was before the BIA and there is nothing to indicate it did not give

it such consideration as it deserved. Since there was no motion to

remand a separate ruling expressly directed thereto was not

required (or ever requested). 

The petition for review is

DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of MDSI Mobile Data Solutions Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Verne
D.  Pecho,  the Vice  President  Finance &  Administration  and Chief  Financial
Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                        /s/  Verne D. Pecho
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Vice President Finance & Administration
                                        and Chief Financial Officer
                                        May 17, 2004
#### BARGER et al. v. BAYLESS et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 12, 1954.

Will C. Hoskins, Hyden, for appellants.

A. E. Cornett, Hyden, for appellees.

CAMMACK, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment of the Leslie Circuit Court declaring the appellees to be the owners in fee simple of the Levi Couch 50 acre land patent, No. 63,269, issued in 1890.

*865On September 3, 1911, Levi Couch conveyed to his daughter, the appellant Bertha Barger, the timber and mineral rights on a tract of land situated on Bob’s Fork in Leslie County. On June 23, 1913, Levi Couch conveyed to Lucy A. Neild fee-simple title to his SO-acre land patent, No. 63,269. Bertha Barger claims her deed covers the timber and mineral rights in the Levi Couch patent that was conveyed to Lucy A. Neild. The portion of the deed relied upon by Bertha Barger follows:

> “Bounded on the East by the lands of Kentucky Coal Lands Co., bounded on the South by the lands of Kentucky Coal Lands 'Co., bounded on the West by the lands of Jesse Couch, bounded on the North by the lands of James Estep.”

A correct description of the bounds of the Levi Couch 50-acre land patent follows:

> “Bounded on the East by the James S. Bowling 100 acre land patent, No. 35862, 1862, bounded on the South and Southeast by the lands of the Kentucky Coal Lands Co., bounded on the West and Southwest by the lands of Jesse Couch, bounded on the West and Northwest by the lands of the Emery Hensley 100 acre land patent, No. 61091, 1887, bounded on the North by the lands of Emery Hensley and James Estep.”

The appellants offered the testimony of Frank Bowling, a surveyor with 25 years of experience, who said that he had located the land described in Bertha Barger’s deed as the Levi Couch land patent, No. 63,269. He said also that the description in the deed was of the type usually given by a layman. The appellants offered additional testimony from residents who had lived in the vicinity of the land from 55 to 85 years, and who knew Levi Couch, to the effect that the land in question was the only land that Levi Couch owned.

The appellees introduced the testimony of John T. Fitzpatrick, a surveyor with 47 years of experience, who said that the land could not be located because it had no beginning point and the tract of land that the deed referred to is not on Bob’s Fork. Other testimony for the appellees showed that the white oak timber was first cut in 1934, and that the other timber was cut at different intervals without any objections from the appellants.

The appellees contend that the appellants’ deed did not convey the land in controversy and is void for uncertainty. The chancellor found that the deed from Levi Couch to Bertha Barger did not cover any part of the Levi Couch patent, No. 63,269.

We find ample evidence to support the chancellor. Therefore, we are not disposed to disturb his finding. iCR 52.01.

Judgment affirmed.
exv10w3



 






Exhibit 10.3




RESIGNATION




Board of Directors

TEKNIK DIGITAL ARTS, INC.

7518 Elbow Bend Road, Suite B-9

Carefree, Arizona 85377




Dear Board Members:



Effective this date, I hereby resign as an employee of TEKNIK DIGITAL ARTS, INC. (the “Company”). Please immediately deliver a check from the Company to me at my
home address in an amount equal to all unpaid salary due me (I have not been paid
since December 15, 2005) and for all accrued vacation less the
sum of $2,500
previously advanced to me by the Company, It is understood that the normal payroll
deductions will be made by the Company in connection with such payment.




Dated: February 27, 2006




Corey Comstock

Signature: /s/ Corey Comstock
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3296 

To authorize the United States Department of Treasury to prioritize certain 

payments in the event that the debt limit is reached. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 16, 2013 

Mr. GALLEGO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To authorize the United States Department of Treasury 

to prioritize certain payments in the event that the debt 

limit is reached. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pay America First 

5 Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

HR 3296 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO PROTECT AMERICA’S SENIORS, VET2 ERANS, AND OTHER DOMESTIC PAYMENTS 

3 PRIOR TO DEBT OBLIGATIONS TO FOREIGN 

4 BONDHOLDERS. 

5 This Act shall take effect if the United States Gov6 ernment defaults on its legal obligations for the first time 

7 in its history, as evidenced by the Secretary of the Treas8 ury taking any of the following actions: 

9 (1) Withhold from making payments of debt obliga10 tions to foreign bond holders, including those in China, 

11 Iran, and the Cayman Islands, before making payments 

12 of debt obligations to programs as listed below: 

13 (a) Make a payment of a debt obligation to the 

14 Social Security and Medicare trust funds or redeem 

15 a debt obligation held by those trust funds. 

16 (b) Redeem a debt obligation held by a trust 

17 fund providing veterans benefits, including the Vet18 erans Special Life Insurance Fund, the Veterans Re19 opened Insurance Fund, the Armed Forces Retire20 ment Home Fund, and the Court of Veteran Ap21 peals Retirement Fund. 

22 (c) Redeem a debt obligation held by an 

23 intragovernmental fund with the purpose of assisting 

24 Americans during a natural disaster, including re25 serves for the National Flood Insurance Program 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

HR 3296 IH

1 and other disaster relief funds appropriated to the 

2 President. 

3 (d) Make a payment of debt obligations to the 

4 Department of Defense, including civilian and uni5 formed personnel (Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force), 

6 military active pay and military retirement benefits, 

7 and military benefits to their families. 

8 SEC. 3. REPORT ON CERTAIN ACTIONS. 

9 (1) In general, after the date of the enactment of this 

10 Act, the Secretary of Treasury exercises his or her author11 ity under subsection (a), the Secretary shall thereafter 

12 submit a report each week to Congress on the payments 

13 issued and amount of revenues incoming and remaining 

14 reserves for upcoming payments issued. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### CLARK v. STATE

No. 24594.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 23, 1949.

None on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is robbery by assault; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinioii approved by the Court.