alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

) 

) 

) Case No. FAA 2015720020 

) (Civil Penalty Action) 

) 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION ) 

Respondent. 

) FDMS no. Not Assigned 

) 

Judge Not Assigned 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

RECEIVED 

SEP 2 1 2015 

HEARING DOCKET 

Please enter the appearance of Greg Stofko as attorney ofrecord for Respondent in the 

above referenced action. Service of all papers by U.S. Mail, expedited courier service, and 

personal delivery should be addressed as follows: 

Greg Stofko 

FedEx Express, Regulatory Affairs 

1700 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

Suite 950 

Washington, DC 20006 

Dated this 18th day of September, 2015. 

By:.~-:::_--cr'e---,L--:-::--:::____c_,L,L / 

re 

orncy for Re ondent 

1700 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

Suite 950 

Washington, DC 20006 

(202) 393-9285 

greg.stofko@fedex.com 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing document has been sent via Federal Express to the 

following: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Mr. David Shayne, Attorney 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW 

Renton, WA 98057 

Dated this 18th day of September, 2015. 

By: 

0 

ey for Res ondent 

1700 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

Suite 950 

Washington, DC 20006 

(202) 393-9285 

greg.stofko@fedex.com
**EXHIBIT 31(i).2 RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Leo Liebowitz, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Getty Realty Corp.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:March 17, 2008By: /s/ LEO LIEBOWITZ
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                              EXHIBIT 12


                                                               MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V
                                                                MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.
                                                                 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                                                   COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                                          (dollars in thousands)



                                                     FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE PERIOD NOVEMBER 3, 1998
                                                      DECEMBER 31, 1999                        TO DECEMBER 25, 1998
                                          --------------------------------------      ------------------------------------
                                           MERRILL LYNCH         MERRILL LYNCH           MERRILL LYNCH      MERRILL LYNCH
                                             PREFERRED              PREFERRED              PREFERRED           PREFERRED
                                          CAPITAL TRUST V        FUNDING V, L.P.        CAPITAL TRUST V    FUNDING V, L.P.
                                          ---------------       ----------------      ------------------   ---------------

<S>                                        <C>                    <C>                    <C>                  <C>

Earnings                                      $ 63,795              $ 74,798                $ 10,101             $ 11,829
                                              ========              ========                ========             ========


Fixed charges                                 $      -              $      -                $      -             $      -

Preferred securities distribution
     requirements                               61,880                63,795                   9,798               10,101
                                              --------              --------                --------             --------

Total combined fixed charges and
     preferred securities distributions       $ 61,880              $ 63,795                $  9,798             $ 10,101
                                              ========              ========                ========             ========

Ratio of earnings to combined
     fixed charges and preferred
     securities distributions                     1.03                  1.17                    1.03                 1.17


</TABLE>
Date: March 4, 2016

To: Docket, EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0738

From: Andrew Bouchard

Subject: Meeting Record for January 12, 2016, Meeting Between the U.S. EPA and 

Occidental Chemical Corporation

On January 12, 2016, representatives of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) participated in a conference call with Occidental Chemical Corporation (OCC). The 

purpose of the call was to discuss their initial MPGF AMEL notice and the comments that OCC 

submitted to the docket on this notice. During the conference call, OCC ran through their 

submitted comments and provided one additional clarification about them. Specifically, OCC 

clarified their comment on operating requirements (1)(f) and (4) in Section III with respect to the 

calculation of monitor downtime associated maintenance periods, instrument adjustments or 

checks to maintain precision and accuracy and zero and span adjustments to not exceed 5 percent 

of the time the flare is receiving regulated material and suggested that the EPA consider a nonrolling 12-month (i.e., annual) basis even though their comment stated a rolling 12-month basis.

See Attachment 1 for the names and affiliations of the meeting participants.
Attachment 1

Participants in January 12, 2016 EPA/OCC Meeting

Occidental Chemical Corporation Representatives

Chris Krishna

Mark Evans

Stephanie Engwall

U.S. EPA Representatives

Andrew Bouchard

Brenda Shine
#### Grace (Tyra) HOLLOM, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 31, 1952.

Leebern Allen and I. M. Combs, Camp-ton, for movant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed. See KRS 242.990 on jurisdiction. Bitzer v. Commonwealth, 141 Ky. 58, 132 S.W. 179, on sufficiency of warrant of arrest.
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3302 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center 

in Bay Pines, Florida, as the ‘‘C.W. Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3302 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 MEDICAL CENTER, BAY PINES, FLORIDA. 

3 The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center 

4 in Bay Pines, Florida, shall after the date of the enact5 ment of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘C.W. 

6 Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Cen7 ter’’. Any reference to such medical center in any law, reg8 ulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the 

9 United States shall be considered to be a reference to the 

10 C.W. Bill Young Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

11 Center. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 22, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
exv10wxbyxxxxvy



 






Exhibit 10(b)xxxv




AMENDMENT TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED

ANADARKO SAVINGS RESTORATION PLAN

DATED JANUARY 1, 1995




     WHEREAS, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”) has heretofore adopted the
Amended and Restated Anadarko Savings Plan dated January 1, 1995 (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan;




     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended, effective as of January 1, 2005, as follows:



     1. The definition of “SRP Eligible Employee” under Section 1.02 of the Plan shall be deleted
and the following shall be substituted therefor:




“SRP Eligible Employee: Any Employee who is currently participating in the
Savings Plan and whose benefits under the Savings Plan are reduced by limitations in
the Code and/or as a result of deferring compensation pursuant to any deferred
compensation plan sponsored by the Company and designated by the Company as a
deferred compensation plan for purposes of this Plan.”



     2. The second sentence of Article II of the Plan shall be deleted and the following shall be
substituted therefor:




“The Plan is made necessary by certain limitations which are imposed on the Savings
Plan by the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder and as a result of
Employees’ elections to defer compensation under nonqualified deferred compensation
arrangements sponsored by the Company which are designated by the Company as a
deferred compensation plan for purposes of this Plan.”



     3. Item (a) of Article V of the Plan shall be deleted and the following shall be substituted
therefor:




	 	“(a) 	 	 equals the Company Matching Contributions which would have been
allocated to such Plan participants’ Company Contribution Account under the
Savings Plan if the Savings Plan had been administered without regard to the
limitations contained in any of Sections 401(a)(17), 401(k)(3), 401(m), 402(g)
and 415 of the Code and without regard to any elective salary and/or bonus
compensation deferrals effected by a Plan Participant under any deferred
compensation arrangement sponsored by the Company which has been designated by
the Company as a deferred compensation plan for purposes of this Plan; and”




 









 










     4. As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed this 20th day
of December, 2004.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Richard A. Lewis
 	 
	 	 	Richard A. Lewis 	 
	 	 	Vice President, Human Resources
Exhibit 11

                           THE STRIDE RITE CORPORATION
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (In Thousands except Per Share Data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended

                                  August 29,   August 30,  August 29, August 30,
                                     1997         1996       1997        1996
                                 -----------  ----------- ----------  ----------

Net income applicable to common
<S>                                <C>          <C>       <C>          <C>
  shares                           $ 8,186      $ 3,193   $19,383      $ 7,583

Calculation of shares:

  Weighted average number of
   common shares outstanding        48,220       49,607    48,863       49,581

  Common shares  attributable to assumed  exercise of dilutive stock options and
   stock purchase rights using the
   treasury stock method               455          224       478          246
                                   ---------

Average common shares and common
  equivalents outstanding during
  the period                        48,675       49,831    49,341       49,827
                                   =========

Net income per common share        $   .17      $   .06   $   .39      $   .15
                                   =========    =======                =======
</TABLE>






















                                      16


<PAGE>
#### Ex parte Charles Scott DICKERSON.

No. 27222.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 27, 1954.

W. E. Martin, Houston, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty„ Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

This is an original application for writ of habeas corpus brought by the relator seeking his release from' the Texas Prison System in which he alleged that, the judgment by which he is confined is indefinite.

The record shows that the relator on October 12, 1949, waived a jury and entered a plea of guilty to the offense of burglary in cause No. 6322 in the District Court of Caldwell County, and the judgment assessed his punishment at “not less than two nor more than twelve years.”

The application was permitted to be filed, and we directed the judge of said court to ascertain if the certified copy of the judgment presented to this Court showed the true facts as to the punishment assessed.

We have now been furnished with certified copies of a motion made by the district attorney praying for the entry of a judgment nunc pro tunc to correct the clerical error in the original judgment as entered in the minutes of the court, together with the sheriff’s return, showing that he served a copy of said motion on relator. We have also been furnished with a certified copy of a judgment nunc pro tunc entered on October 11, 1954, reciting that relator was present and represented by the Honorable Aubry Fielder and finding that the judgment as actually rendered by the court on October 12, 1949, assessed relator’s punishment at “a term of 12 years.”

The question presented by relator’s application having become moot, the relief prayed for is denied.
V 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3238 

For the relief of Simeon Simeonov, Stela Simeonova, Stoyan Simeonov, and 

Vania Simeonova. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 2, 2013 

Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Simeon Simeonov, Stela Simeonova, Stoyan 

Simeonov, and Vania Simeonova. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SIMEON 

4 SIMEONOV, STELA SIMEONOVA, STOYAN 

5 SIMEONOV, AND VANIA SIMEONOVA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

7 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act, Simeon Simeonov, Stela Simeonova, Stoyan 

9 Simeonov, and Vania Simeonova shall each be eligible for 

10 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3238 IH

1 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi2 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi3 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

4 of status to lawful permanent resident. 

5 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Simeon Simeonov, 

6 Stela Simeonova, Stoyan Simeonov, or Vania Simeonova 

7 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci8 fied in subsection (c), he or she shall be considered to have 

9 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi10 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

11 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 

12 the enactment of this Act. 

13 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

14 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap15 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica16 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

17 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

18 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

19 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res20 idence to Simeon Simeonov, Stela Simeonova, Stoyan 

21 Simeonov, and Vania Simeonova, the Secretary of State 

22 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 4, during the 

23 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

24 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

25 country of the aliens’ birth under section 203(a) of the 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3238 IH

1 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

2 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

3 to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section 

4 202(e) of such Act. 

5 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

6 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

7 parents, brothers, and sisters of Simeon Simeonov, Stela 

8 Simeonova, Stoyan Simeonov, and Vania Simeonova shall 

9 not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 

10 privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 

11 Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### HALL v. STATE.

No. 23604.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 4, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of assault to murder without malice, and *1020assessed a penalty of three years in the penitentiary.

The proceedings appear to be regular. Nothing is presented for our consideration for the record, as brought forward, contains neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 32(b)


              SECTION 1350 Certification (Chief Financial Officer)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Financial  Corporation,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I Jerry L. Rexroad, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the period covered by the Report.

This Certification is provided as of August 12, 2004.



                                   /s/ Jerry L. Rexroad
                                   --------------------------------
                                   Jerry L. Rexroad
                                   Executive Vice President   and Chief
                                   Financial Officer


                                     32
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Warning Model Management, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stanley Tepper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Stanley Tepper
 _____________________________
 Stanley Tepper
 Chief Financial Officer
 April 13, 2004
#### Ex parte STRICKLAND.

No. 24814.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 12, 1950.

*855None on appeal for appellant. •

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

This is an application for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus on the part of relator who is an inmate of the State Penitentiary under a life term sentence.

It is claimed that an erroneous judgment was entered at the time of relator’s conviction upon the verdict of the jury which assessed such life term.

We are not furnished with a certified copy of such judgment. However, we do have a copy of a judgment in the ordinal case showing a correction nunc pro ■tunc of the original judgment (the copy being dated March 15, 1950) entered in the original case correcting an error in ' the original judgment, which original judgment was evidently uncertain in that it provided for a confinement in the state penitentiary for not less than two years nor more than life.

It is noted that this application was not presented to this court until March 29, 1950. It is shown by the copies of the record filed with said application that the judgment 'based upon a proper verdict of the jury but erroneously entered, had been corrected as provided by Art. 772, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., on March 15, 1950, prior to the presentation to this court of the ■present application.

It appears that relator, at the time of such presentation and at this time, is confined in the state penitentiary upon a proper judgment and sentence. Therefore, the issuance of the writ prayed for herein is denied.