alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ROBERT PINEAU *v.*HOME DEPOT, INC.

(SC 15768)

Callahan, C. J., and Katz, Palmer, McDonald and Peters, Js.

Argued March 26

officially released July 14, 1998

*423
      *Max F. Brunswick,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Frederick J. Trotta, Sr.,*with whom was *Cynthia K. Sammarco,*for the appellee (defendant).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.1

The appeal is dismissed.

We granted the plaintiffs petition for certification limited to the following issue: “Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to a jury instruction on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur?” *Pineau*v. *Home Depot, Inc.,*243 Conn. 902, 701 A.2d 332 (1997).
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET 

Product Name: ICYNENE MD-R-210TM 

Page 1 of 2 (F) Spray ICYNENE LD-C-50TM 

6747 Campobello Rd., Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L7, Canada 

Tel: 905.363.4040 Toll Free: 800.758.7325 Fax: 905.363.0102 

Section 1: Chemical, Product and Company Information 

Product Name: ICYNENE MD-R-210TM 

ICYNENE MD-R-210TM is a trademark of Icynene Inc. 

Product Use: SPRAY-ON CELLULAR PLASTIC INSULATION

Product Code: Not Applicable 

Revision Date: Oct. 27, 2011 

Section 2: Ingredient Information 

Ingredients Cas No: Wt.%:

Polyurethane Foam 

Reaction product of polyMDI and Icynene MDR-210TM 

Not Applicable 100% 

NOTE: This polyurethane foam does not contain any ozone destroying or global warming refrigerants 

such as CFC’s, HCFC’s, or HFA’s. 

Section 3: PHYSICAL DATA

Appearance:

Solubility In Water:

Density:

Semi-rigid cellular foam of creamy colour. 

Insoluble. 

2.0 lbs./cubic foot 

Odour: None 

Emissions: Safe for occupancy after 24 hrs, no emissions detectable after 30 

days. 

Section 4: FIRE & EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA

Flammability: Combustion occurs at 400°F (material will not sustain combustion on 

its own) 

Flame Spread: Less than 25 

Smoke Developed: Less than 450

Method Used: ASTM E84 

Melting: Does not melt 

Flammable Limits: LFL: - not determined 

UFL: - not determined 

Extinguishing Media: Water, carbon dioxide, dry chemical or foam. 
 MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET 

Product Name: ICYNENE MD-R-210TM 

Page 2 of 2 (F) Spray ICYNENE LD-C-50TM 

Fire & Explosion Hazards: Prevent breathing of combustion fumes (smoke) 

Fire Fighting Equipment: Firefighters must wear a self-contained breathing apparatus to avoid 

breathing smoke generated by combustion. 

Section 5: REACTIVITY DATA

Stability: Stable under all normal conditions 

Incompatibility: Compatible with all products 

Section 6: ENVIRONMENTAL & DISPOSAL INFORMATION

Disposal Method: Follow all federal, provincial, state and local regulations. 

Section 7: HEALTH HAZARD DATA

Detectable Emissions: No detectable emissions 

Systemic & Other Effects: Not available 

Ingestion: The consequences of ingestion of large amounts are unknown 

Dust Inhalation: May cause mechanical irritation to the respiratory system 

Eye Protection: Use glasses when cutting foam 

Skin Protection: Dust from foam cutting may cause irritation 

Section 8: FIRST AID

Ingestion: Medical advice should be obtained 

Inhalation: Remove to fresh air, consult a physician 

Eye Contact: Flush with water to remove particles 

Skin Contact: No special precautions required 

Section 9: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

THE INFORMATION HEREIN IS GIVEN IN GOOD FAITH, BUT NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR 

IMPLIED, IS MADE. CONTACT ICYNENE INC. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 

Section 10: PREPARATION INFORMATION:

Prepared by: Nick Xie 

Title: Senior R&D Scientist 

Telephone: 1-800-758-7325 

Date of Preparation: Oct. 27, 2011
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp
                         -------------------------------
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, each hereby
certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of their knowledge:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



 August 14, 2006                         By:  /s/  Harold K. Fletcher
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                   Harold K. Fletcher
                                                   Chairman and President

                                              /s/  Joseph P. Macaluso
                                              ---------------------------------
                                                   Joseph P. Macaluso
                                                   Principal Accounting Officer



     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp and will be retained by
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 476 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3226 

[Report No. 113–636] 

To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 

certain properties in South Carolina. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2013 

Mr. RICE of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 1, 2014 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on October 1, 2013] 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3226 RH

A BILL 

To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 

Resources System certain properties in South Carolina. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3226 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF PROPERTIES IN SOUTH CAROLINA 

4 FROM JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER 

5 RESOURCES SYSTEM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map subtitled ‘‘Long Pond 

7 Unit SC–01’’ included in the sets of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal 

8 Barrier Resources System’’ referred to in section 4(a) of the 

9 Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and re10 lating to the Long Pond Unit in South Carolina is hereby 

11 replaced by another map relating to the same unit entitled 

12 ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Cor13 rected Long Pond Unit SC–01’’ dated September 30, 2014. 

14 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

15 keep each map revised under subsection (a) on file and 

16 available for inspection in accordance with section 4(b) of 

17 the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 476 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3226 

[Report No. 113–636] 

A BILL 

To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal BarSouth Carolina. rier Resources System certain properties in 

DECEMBER 1, 2014 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 the undersigned officer of Tecumseh
Products Company (the "Company") hereby certifies to such officer's knowledge,
that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 12, 2003                  BY:     /s/ DAVID W. KAY
       ------------------                    --------------------------------
                                             David W. Kay
                                             Vice President, Treasurer and
                                             Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from The
Bombay Company, Inc. quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended April 29, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000096287
<NAME> THE BOMBAY COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                           26982
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      87673
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                125382
<PP&E>                                          109648
<DEPRECIATION>                                   62612
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  188512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            33790
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         38150
<OTHER-SE>                                      109517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    188512
<SALES>                                          85288
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 85288
<CGS>                                            61809
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    88454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (397)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2769)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1094)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1675)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1675)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our report dated March 8, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Evolving Systems, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Evolving Systems, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 323-122476, effective February 2, 2005, and File No. 333-112082, effective January 22, 2004) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-167858, effective June 29, 2010, File No. 333-144852, effective July 25, 2007, File No. 333-141527, effective March 23, 2007, File No. 333-116085, effective June 2, 2004, File No. 333-103655, effective March 7, 2003, File No. 333-89438, effective May 31, 2002, File No. 333-61446, effective May 23, 2001, File No. 333-82473, effective July 8, 1999, File No. 333-60779, effective August 6, 1998, and File No. 333-58285, effective July 1, 1998).

 

GRANT THORNTON LLP

Denver, Colorado

March 8, 2011

 

----
EXHIBIT 10.25

                          SMART ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.


The  undersigned,  agrees that he, she or it will not,  directly or  indirectly,
issue,  offer, agree or offer to sell, sell, grant an option for the purchase or
sale of, transfer, pledge, assign, hypothecate, distribute or otherwise encumber
or dispose  (collectively,  "Sell" or "Sold") of any securities referenced below
of the Smart Energy Solutions,  Inc.,  formerly known as Datigen.com,  Inc. (the
"Company"),  including options, rights, warrants or other securities underlying,
convertible  into,  exchangeable  or exercisable  for or evidencing any right to
purchase or subscribe for any common stock (whether or not beneficially owned by
the  undersigned),  or  any  beneficial  interest  therein  (collectively,   the
"Securities"), except as follows:

      1.    After April 2006, 20% of the Securities referenced below held by the
            undersigned can be Sold;

      2.    After April 2007, 30% of the Securities referenced below held by the
            undersigned can be Sold; and

      3.    After April 2008, the balance thereof.

Notwithstanding  the foregoing,  the  undersigned  shall be entitled to Sell the
Securities as long as the transaction does not involve the Securities being Sold
on the  Over-the-Counter  Bulletin  Board (or any other exchange or medium where
the securities of the Company are listed or quoted), provided, however, that any
transferee of the  Securities,  including  without  limitation,  a person who is
gifted the Securities or lends against the Securities, shall agree in writing to
the restrictions  contained herein prior to and as a condition to the Securities
being Sold.

In order to enable the  aforesaid  covenants  to be  enforced,  the  undersigned
hereby consents to the placing of legends and/or  stop-transfer  orders with the
transfer agent of the Company's securities with respect to any of the Securities
registered  in  the  name  of  the  undersigned  or  beneficially  owned  by the
undersigned.



Dated: ____ __, 2006



                                Name: ____________________________

                                Certificate Nos.: ________________


                                      -4-
#### ADAMS v. STATE.

No. 25214.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 21, 1951.

Rehearing Denied May 2, 1951.

No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The unlawful sale of whisky in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $125.

Appellant waived trial by jury and entered his plea of guilty before the court.

As the record before us contains neither bills of exception nor a statement of facts, nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### MUELA v. STATE.

No. 24634.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 8, 1950.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 1950.

Hubert T. Faulk, El Paso, for appellant.

William E. Clayton, Dist. Átty., El Paso, William B. Jennings, Asst. Dist. Atty., El Paso, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a case of robbery by assault; the punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

The sole question presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.

*809Carreon, the injured party, testified that about two o’clock in the morning, as he was walking down a street in the city of El Paso, he was jointly attacked and assaulted by two men and there was taken from off his person a billfold containing some Mexican currency.

We note that Carreon testified: “Yes, sir, this defendant is one of the men that jumped on me and took my billfold.”

We are unable to conclude, especially in view of the statement just quoted, that the facts are insufficient to support the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.

HAWKINS, P. J., absent.

Opinion approved by the Court
SERVED: JULY 1,2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

DIAMOND AIR CHARTER, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10EA0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2010-0620 

iRTMFNT OF 

;yPORTATiOM 

: I OFERATiONS 

L - i P i: 2Lj 

ORDER OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

ADJOURNING PREHEARING CONFERENCE SINE DIE 

In its "Request for Postponement of Pre-Hearing Conference" served June 30, 2011, 

Complainant states that Friday, July 1, 2011, "would be a particularly inconvenient day for" the 

Prehearing Telephone Conference scheduled for that day because Complainant's Counsel must 

"attend to personal matters." Complainant states that "the parties are continuing to discuss settlement." 

Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Prehearing Telephone Conference is adjourned 

sine die. 

SO ORDERED. 

pimie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative'. 

Attachment - Service List 

I *-
FAA Docket No. CP10EA0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL ^Ol ^ COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 ., •, 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430,.. .; 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite iWlbOO^ 

ONE^OP ^ 

Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel 

Aviation Law Experts, LLC 

One Research Court, Suite 450 V^CIA 

Rockville, MD 20850 

TEL: 301-294-8550 V 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

2^chary M. Herman, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, AEA-7 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza, Room 561 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 -

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room E12-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or byciipedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W„WHbltf Wright Building - Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2-
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID LOPEZ

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 058

- CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20110D03070 )

MEMORAND U M OPINION

Appellant David Lopez has filed a motion to dismiss his own appeal. The Court grants

Appellant’s motion and dismisses this appeal

. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.2 (governing voluntary

dismissals in criminal cases).

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

October 31, 2019

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09

- 23

- 00096

- CV

__________________ JUAN ENRIQUE HURTADO , Appellant
V.
PATTI JONES , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 17

- 07

- 09255

- CV

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Juan Enrique Hurtado (Hurtado) file d a notice of appeal from an order directing the clerk to release funds from the registry of the trial court

. On April 25 , 2023, the District Clerk notified the Court that Hurtado had failed to pay or to arrange to pay for the clerk ’ s record in his appeal. On that same day, we notified the parties that the clerk ’ s record had not been filed and we warned Hurtado
that we would dismiss th e appeal unless he arranged to pay the fee required to file2 the clerk ’ s record or he explained that he needed additional time to do so by May 2 5 , 2023. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
On May 1 6 , 2023, through a notice issued by the Clerk of the Court, we warned the parties that Hurtado had not remitted the filing fee and that unless he paid the fee, the Court would dismiss the appeal without further notice on any date
after May 31 , 2023. Hurtado neither paid the filing fee nor asserted that he was
unable t o afford payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 20.1. None of the parties responded to the Court ’ s notices. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation justifying the appellant ’ s failure to pay the filing fee for the appeal or to arrange to pay for a cl erk ’ s record to support his appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3, 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on Ju ne 2 8 , 2023 Opinion Delivered June 29, 2023
Before Horton , Johnson and Wright, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 29, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10827 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAMES DAVID DANIEL, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:92-CR-98

-------------------- Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Defendant-Appellant James David Daniel appeals the district

court’s revocation of his supervised release, which had been imposed following his conviction of attempted possession of a listed chemical with intent to manufacture a controlled substance. Daniel contends that his sentence was unreasonable because the district court did not give adequate reasons for sentencing him above the advisory guidelines range. We need not decide the appropriate standard of review for a sentence imposed on revocation of supervised release in the wake of United States v. Booker , 5432

U.S. 220 (2005), because Daniel has not shown that his sentence was either unreasonable or plainly unreasonable. See United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1804 (2006). Although it is in excess of the recommended range, Daniel’s sentence is within the statutory maximum sentence that the district court could have imposed. Furthermore, a review of the record demonstrates that the district court considered the relevant sentencing factors. See United States v. Smith, 440 F.3d 704, 707 (5th Cir. 2006) . Daniel’s sentence was neither unreasonable nor plainly unreasonable. AFFIRMED.
#### Ex parte THOMAS.

No. 25728.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 27, 1952.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The relator seems to be held by the Sheriff of Dallas County, Texas, to be surrendered to officers of the State of Louisiana by virtue of a certain warrant of extradition.

We find no statement of facts in the record, nor do we find any bills of exception therein. Therefore, we see nothing herein calling for a review of this matter upon our part.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.