alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### FULLER et al. v. CITY OF COVINGTON.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 12, 1954.

Stanley Chrisman, Covington, for appellants.

Edwin H. Henry, City Sol., Rodney S. Bryson, Asst. City Sol., Covington, for appellee.

CAMMACK, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment giving the appellants $17,500 for their land condemned for a flood wall. They claim that they were entitled to $35,295 for the land taken and damages to the remaining property.

The appellants bought the land in 1947. It is referred to as Lots Nos. 75, 76, 77, 78 and 79, and consists of about five acres. On Lot No. 79 there is an old brick scale house, which is rented for $25 per month. The lots are unimproved and below the high-water mark on the west bank of Licking River. In 1952 the City condemned a strip through the center of the land, consisting of about three acres, for a flood wall and a 15 foot sewer easement adjacent to the west side of the flood wall. The land left to the appellants was a strip 1,000 by 60 feet fronting on the Licking River and accessible from the northern end only, and the greater portion of Lots Nos. 76 and 79.

The jury was instructed to find separately the value of the property taken from each lot and the amount allowed was to include incidental damages, if any, to the remaining adjacent real estate. The jury returned a verdict allowing for Lot No. 75, $3,730; for Lot-No. 76, $2,060; for Lot' No. 77, $4,400; for Lot No. 78, $4,-680; and for Lot No. 79, $2,630. Numerous errors are asserted in the appeal from the judgment on that verdict.

The appellants contend that the court erred in permitting to go to the jury evidence on the assessed value of the property as fixed by the city assessor in 1944 and which continued through 1952 without change. Clifford Knapke, the deputy city assessor, testified that there was an objection made by the appellants to the assessed value of the lots in question. Harry Fuller was pointed out to him and he was asked if Fuller was the one who made the objection. Knapke said that he did not know the man but had seen him before. Harry Fuller did not deny that he had made an objection to the assessment. In 18 Am.Jur., Eminent Domain, section 350, it is said: “and an oral complaint to an assessor that the property was overvalued has been held competent as an admission.”

The appellants contend also that it was error for the court not to instruct the jury specifically on the amount of property taken and the amount of property left af*935ter the taking. The amount of property taken and the amount remaining thereafter were referred to throughout the trial. A map exhibited to the jury showed clearly the whole situation. Under the circumstances, we do not think the jury was in any way misled by the instruction on this question. Other objections are made that the instructions did not present the case adequately to the jury. When the instructions are viewed in' their entirety we think they did present the' cáse fairly, and this was reflected by the amount of the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.
### Eleventh Court of Appeals Mandate

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS

T O T HE 104 TH D ISTRICT C OURT O F T AYLOR C OUNTY

, G REETINGS :

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas, on November 9, 2017, the

cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Martel Sephion Beaver

11th Court of Appeals No. 11-15-00290-CR and

104th District Court Case No. 19548B

The State of Texas

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“ 

### This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. "

WHEREFORE WE COMMAND YOU To observe the order of our said Court of

Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

W ITNESS

, the H ON

. J IM R. W RIGHT

, Chief

Justice of our said Court, with the seal

thereof annexed at the City of Eastland, on

January 8, 2018.

S HERRY W ILLIAMSON

, C LERK
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P.
for the period ended December 26, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Linda L. Lowry,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V


                              By:  /s/ LINDA L. LOWRY
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Linda L. Lowry *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: March 22, 2004
_____________________

* Linda L. Lowry functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
#### UNITED FIDELITY LIFE INS. CO. v. LANGHORNE.

No. 5901.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

Feb. 12, 1942.

Storey, Sanders, Sherrill & Armstrong, of Dallas, for appellant.

Norman M. West, of Henderson, for ap-pellee.

*197WILLIAMS, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order overruling the plea of privilege of the appellant, United Fidelity Life Insurance Company, a corporation, in a suit filed against it in the District Court of Rusk County by the appellee, Joe H. Langhome. As a basis for the venue in the county of suit, ap-pellee urged that portion of Exception 23 of Article 1995, R.C.S.1925, namely, “Suits against a private corporation * * * may be brought in any county * * * in which such corporation * * * has an agency or representative * *

Appellee offered no proof showing a prima facie right of recovery. He offered in evidence on the hearing his original petition in which he seeks to recover alleged commissions growing out of an agency contract executed partly in Dallas County, Texas, and partly in the State of Arkansas. No contention is made that the cause of action arose in whole or in part, or that it was performable in whole or in part in Rusk County, Texas. Appellee alleged in his controverting plea, as well as in his petition, and it was admitted upon the hearing, that appellant was a corporation organized under the laws of Texas, with its domicile in Dallas County, Texas; and that at the time this suit was filed, at the time service of citation was had upon Virgil Harris, and at the time of this hearing, the appellant had an agent and representative in Rusk County, in the person of said Virgil Harris, a resident of Rusk County, Texas. The only controversy presented is whether or not the appellee was required to go further and make out a prima facie case in addition to showing that the appellant was a corporation with a representative or agent in said Rusk County. This same question was presented in Rural Life Ins. Co. v. Caperton, Tex. Civ.App., 156 S.W.2d 309, and there decided adversely to appellant’s contention. Any observations we might make would be a repetition of the reasons and expressions set out in the above case and the authorities there cited, together with the case of Conq> ton v. Elliott, 126 Tex. 232, 88 S.W72d 91.

The action of the trial court in overruling appellant’s plea of privilege is sustained.

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3260 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3260

   Eliminating the debt ceiling for a period defined, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 2013

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   Eliminating the debt ceiling for a period defined, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fiscal Sanity Act for the National 
Debt''.

SEC. 2. NONAPPLICABILITY OF DEBT CEILING.

    Section 3101(b) of title 31, United States Code, shall not apply 
for the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and 
ending 60 days thereafter.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3330 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3330

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the limitation on the 
number of veterans authorized to be enrolled in programs of independent 
    living services and assistance administered by the Secretary of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 23, 2013

  Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico (for herself, Mr. Ben Ray 
 Lujan of New Mexico, Mr. Yoder, Mr. Jeffries, Mr. Scott of Virginia, 
Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. Enyart, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. 
Cartwright, Mrs. Negrete McLeod, Mr. Schiff, Mr. O'Rourke, Ms. Kuster, 
  Mr. Horsford, Ms. Tsongas, and Mr. Ribble) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the limitation on the 
number of veterans authorized to be enrolled in programs of independent 
    living services and assistance administered by the Secretary of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans' Independent Living 
Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF VETERANS ENROLLED IN PROGRAMS 
              OF INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE 
              ADMINISTERED BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 3120 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (e); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (e).
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (a) of such section is 
amended by striking ``subsection (f)'' and inserting ``subsection 
(e)''.
    (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 60 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 
submit to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and House 
of Representatives a plan to educate employees of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs whose responsibilities relate to vocational 
rehabilitation counseling or employment counseling about the benefits 
and appropriate use of the independent living services provided under 
section 3120 of title 38, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,979,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,831,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,220,000
<PP&E>                                      62,295,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,610,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             146,942,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,437,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 102,144,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               146,942,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            96,144,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               91,054,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,590,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,304,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   490,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,814,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,814,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 22

- 11498
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus DEMORRIS ADAMS, a.k.a. Mario,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:19

- cr

- 00021

- LAG

- TQL

- 2 USCA11 Case: 22-11498 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 01/11/2023 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 22

- 11498

____________________ Before R OSENBAUM , J ILL P RYOR , and B RASHER , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Jenifer E nterante Cummings, appointed counsel for DeMorris Adams in this appeal from his conviction s and total sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distribution of methamphetamine , has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Becaus e independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Adams’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED

. USCA11 Case: 22-11498 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 01/11/2023 Page: 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27319]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

39th Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 206, Aeronautical 
Information and Meteorological Data Link Services

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 206, Aeronautical 
Information and Meteorological Data Link Services.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
thirty-ninth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 206, Aeronautical 
Information and Meteorological Data Link Services.

DATES: The meeting will be held December 8-12, 2014, 10:00 a.m.-5:00 
p.m. on Monday (EST), 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Tuesday to Thursday and 8:30 
a.m.-11:00 a.m. on Friday.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1150 18th St. NW., Suite 
910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0652/(202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 206. The agenda will 
include the following:

December 8th Monday 10:00 a.m.

 Opening Plenary
 Opening remarks and Attendees' introductions
 Review and approval of meeting agenda
 Approval of previous meeting minutes (Norman, OK)
 TOR changes
 Industry presentations
    [cir] Systems Wide Information Management Program Status
    [cir] Weather Technology in the Cockpit (WTIC) Concept of 
Operations

December 9th--10th Tuesday and Wednesday 8:30 a.m.

 Sub-Group meetings (Plenary if FIS-B MOPS has large number of 
comments and needs more time to resolve)

December 10th Wednesday 1:00 p.m.

 FAA AAtS Workshop

December 11th Thursday

 Plenary: FIS-B MOPS FRAC Review (start date if small number of 
comments)
 Sub-Group meetings (Plenary FIS-B MOPS FRAC Review, if needed)

December 12th Friday

Closing Plenary
 Sub-Groups' reports and Action item review
 Future meeting plans and dates
 Other business
 Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 11, 2014.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Program Oversight and Administration, 
Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-27319 Filed 11-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0001051860
<NAME>    SCOVILL HOLDINGS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,722
<INVENTORY>                                     18,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,770
<PP&E>                                          60,746
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,883
<BONDS>                                        149,019
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,242
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,453
<SALES>                                         89,190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,190
<CGS>                                           69,656
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,871
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,171
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   921
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,839
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (29,691)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,089)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (28,602)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (28,602)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F ofTricom, S.A. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the “PeriodicReport”), I, Hector Castro Noboa, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledgethe Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained inthe Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                    | /s/ HECTOR CASTRO NOBOA |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Dated: October 29, 2007 | Hector Castro Noboa     |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----