alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORP.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTH
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000936105
<NAME> ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,630
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,787
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,163
<INVENTORY>                                      2,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,636
<PP&E>                                         883,538
<DEPRECIATION>                                 555,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 422,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,782
<BONDS>                                         60,479
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       263,537
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,699)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   422,039
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               242,933
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  175,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,433
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 63,844
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,140
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             41,704
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (6,949)
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,755
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3254 

Making continuing appropriations for all departments and agencies of the 

Federal Government, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 5, 2013 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

Making continuing appropriations for all departments and 

agencies of the Federal Government, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal Sanity Act for 

5 Appropriations’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS. 

7 There is hereby appropriated for 240 days after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act— 

9 (1) for each project or activity for which budget 

10 authority was provided in the Consolidated and FurVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:42 Oct 06, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3254.IH H3254

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3254 IH

1 ther Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (Public 

2 Law 113–6), an amount equal to the budget author3 ity provided in such Act, as reduced pursuant to the 

4 Presidential sequestration order dated March 1, 

5 2013, to remain available for a comparable period of 

6 availability; and 

7 (2) for entitlements and other mandatory pay8 ments whose budget authority was provided in ap9 propriations Acts for fiscal year 2013, and for activi10 ties under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, such 

11 amounts as may be necessary to maintain program 

12 levels as they existed on September 30, 2013. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### STREET v. STATE.

No. 22191.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 17, 1942.

Clayton & Bralley, of Amarillo, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction is for operating an oversized vehicle upon a public highway; the punishment, a fine of $25.

The information, in its charging part, reads as follows: “did then and there unlawfully as owner, caused and permitted an oversized vehicle to be driven, operated and moved upon a highway in Donley County, Texas, to-wit; the public highway leading from Clarendon to Goldston and commonly known as State Highway No. 18, without having a permit issued by the Texas Highway Department or under its direction and without having a designated route marked off by the State Highway Department or under its direction”.

By motion to quash, appellant attacked the sufficiency of the information as being vague, indefinite, and as failing to charge any offense.

*211The information was subject to the defects charged. The motion to quash should have been sustained.

The provisions of Art. 827a, Sec. 3, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., under which this prosecution was had, make it unlawful to operate, upon the public highways of this state, vehicles of size or weight exceeding certain limitations. The limitations appear in said Article and govern the width, length and height of the vehicles.

The term “oversized,” as used in the information, is not known to, and does not appear in, the statute. Whether such term has reference to width, length or height of the vehicle is not susceptible of ascertainment. Such fact demonstrates the vague and indefinite allegations upon which the State relied and obtained this conviction.

An accused is entitled to know, from the State’s pleading, the nature of the accusation against him and wherein he is alleged to have violated the law. Parker v. State, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 138, 114 S.W.2d 906; Gutierrez v. State, 125 Tex.Cr.R. 283, *68*S.W.2d 198; Ex parte Vasquez, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 475, 56 S.W.2d 190; Monroe v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 157 S.W.2d 648.

From what we have said, it follows that the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of 'Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Docket Number FAA-2013-0794
#### STROUD v. STATE.

No. 22867.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 17, 1944.

D. T. Moore, of Hillsboro, for appellant. Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin,, for the State.

*439GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to commit rape, and his punishment assessed at ten years’ confinement in the State penitentiary.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment appears to be in proper form. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3230 

AN ACT 

Making continuing appropriations during a Government shutdown to provide pay and allowances to members of the 

reserve components of the Armed Forces who perform 

inactive-duty training during such period. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3230 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pay Our Guard and 

3 Reserve Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR PAY AND AL5 LOWANCES FOR CERTAIN RESERVE COMPO6 NENT MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—There are hereby appropriated for 

8 fiscal year 2014, out of any money in the Treasury not 

9 otherwise appropriated, for any period during which in10 terim or full-year appropriations for fiscal year 2014 are 

11 not in effect such sums as are necessary to provide pay 

12 and allowances to members of the reserve components of 

13 the Armed Forces (as named in section 10101 of title 10, 

14 United States Code) who perform inactive-duty training 

15 (as defined in section 101(d)(7) of such title) during such 

16 period. 

17 (b) TERMINATION.—Appropriations and funds made 

18 available and authority granted pursuant to this section 

19 shall be available until whichever of the following first oc20 curs: (1) the enactment into law of an appropriation (in21 cluding a continuing appropriation) for any purpose for 

22 which amounts are made available in this section; (2) the 

23 enactment into law of the applicable regular or continuing 
3 

•HR 3230 EH

1 appropriations resolution or other Act without any appro2 priation for such purpose; or (3) January 1, 2015. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 3, 

2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3230 

AN ACT 

Making continuing appropriations during a Governsuch period. Forces who perform inactive-duty training during members of the reserve components of the Armed ment shutdown to provide pay and allowances to
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05334

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

05334\05334_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05334\05334_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

05334\Certification Statement_05334.pdf Plant certification statement

x 05334\Supporting Documentation\Email from ERG_05334.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey.

x 05334\05334_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05334\05334_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### ZEGLEN v. STATE.

No. 26333.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 1, 1953.

*416No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

William H. Scott, Cr. Dist. Atty., and King C. Haynie, Asst. Cr. Dist. Atty., Houston, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of murder without malice, and her punishment was assessed at five years confinement in the penitentiary.

The indictment and all matters of procedure appear to be regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended August 31, 2008 (the "Quarterly Report") of Multi-Media
Tutorial Services, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending August 31, 2008,
I, Barry Reichman, President, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

         1.       The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         2.       The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 17, 2008

/s/ Barry Reichman
------------------
Barry Reichman
President
(Principal Executive Officer)
(Principal Financial Officer)
#### WHITLEY v. STATE.

No. 25182.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 7, 1951.

Rehearing- Denied May 2, 1951.

Francis C. Richter, Hondo, for appellant. George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, -Commissioner.

The conviction is for cattle theft, with punishment assessed by a jury at two years in the penitentiary.

The record contains no bills of exception and no statement of facts.

The proceedings as shown by the transcript appear to be regular.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Opinion approved by' the court.

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant sets up a claim that he was deprived of a statement of facts and bills of exception without any fault of his own. Attached to this application is his “Exhibit A” consisting of an affidavit -of the court reporter. This affidavit fails to show any diligence on the part of the appellant to secure a statement of facts. As drawn it states that -he received an order for them, but does not give the time in which he received it; that at such time he had other orders for criminal and civil cases. Plis affidavit does not show, however, that they were cases tried in the court from which *775appellant’s case comes. Even if they had been, the law places in this court no discretion to receive a statement of facts filed beyond the time allowed by law.

We are, therefore, relegated to a question of whether or not appellant exercised due diligence to secure a statement of facts. His “Exhibit B” is a statement by the trial judge. This states no ground in aid of the question of diligence. Other affidavits from the judge and court reporter, as to the efforts made by appellant to secure his statement of facts within the time provided by law, have been presented and it is made to clearly appear that appellant did not use due diligence.

For the reason stated the appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3293 

To reform the public debt limit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 15, 2013 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reform the public debt limit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Debt Limit Reform 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFORM OF THE PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT. 

7 (a) AUTHORITY OF PRESIDENT TO INCREASE PUB8 LIC DEBT LIMIT.—Section 3101 of title 31, United States 

9 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

10 subsection: 

11 ‘‘(d) The dollar amount in effect under subsection (b) 

12 shall be increased at such times and in such amounts as 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3293 IH

1 the President of the United States, or his designee, may 

2 provide.’’. 

3 (b) GOVERNMENT-HELD DEBT NOT TAKEN INTO

4 ACCOUNT FOR PURPOSES OF THE PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT.— 

5 Section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, as amended 

6 by subsection (a) is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(e) Obligations held by the United States Govern9 ment (including any obligation which is classified as an 

10 intragovernmental holding by the Secretary of the Treas11 ury or which is held by any agency or instrumentality of 

12 the United States) shall not be taken into account for pur13 poses of applying the limitation imposed under subsection 

14 (b).’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EUGENE KILLIAN, JR.* 

CAR L A. SAL*ISBURY* 

AVRIN SLATKI N 

RYAN MILUN* * 

KILLIA N 

SALISBUR Y 

*ME.MBER NJ a NY BARS 

**ME:MBE R NJ a CA BARS 

& 

ATTORNEY S A T LA W 

810-100303-05 m. 5 

February 24, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

c^ 

Subject: 

0018 

Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST- 2010-

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

I support the Continental Airlines application to provide daily nonstop service between 

New York/Newark and Tokyo Haneda airport. New air service to Haneda, which is 

scheduled to begin later this year, is made possible by the wide ranging open skies 

agreement with Japan achieved by your Department. I applaud your efforts on the 

historic open skies agreement and now urge you to select Continental to provide service 

connecting the U.S.'s financial and commercial center at New York/Newark with Tokyo's 

central/downtown airport. 

Liberty - Haneda service would provide a critical link between two of the world's largest 

economies and will help boost trade and commerce across the New York/Newark 

region and secondarily across the entire northeastern region of the U.S. Liberty airport 

is surrounded by the largest population per square mile in the country, which includes 

millions of Asian Americans. Additionally, recent studies show that for every flight 

added by Continental in the New York/Newark region, the local economy benefits as 

employment is sustained, regional incomes are enhanced and trade expands. 

As Continental operates the only true hub in the region that connects New York/Newark 

and much of the U.S. to the world, Continental is the right choice for new Haneda 

service as communities across the entire eastern U.S. will gain access to Haneda via 

connections at Liberty. Additionally, Continental Airlines has set itself apart as a strong 

555 ROUTE 1 SOUTH, SUITE 430 • ISELIN, NE W JERSEY 08830 • TEL: 732.912.2100 • FAX: 732.912.2101 

14 WALL STREET, 20TH FLOOR • NE W YORK, NE W YORK 1 0005 • TEL: 212.618.1409 • FAX: 212.618.1705 

WWW.K-S.COM 
The Honorable Ray LaHood 

February 24, 2010 

Page 2 

airiine with a commitment to safety and excellence for customers, 

be taken into account when awarding any route to Haneda. 

No doubt this should 

Continental Airiines is committed to the Asian region and to nonstop Tokyo Haneda 

service. The New York/Newark economy, millions of Americans on the U.S. east coast, 

the airline's thousands of employees and hundreds of thousands of U.S. consumers will 

benefit from Continental's proposed service and will work together to make Liberty 

International Airport- Haneda service a real success. 

I urge you to award Tokyo Haneda rights to Continental Airiines and my region of the 

U.S. 

Sincerely,
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

I, S. Gene Thompson, ChiefFinancial Officer of Gasel Transportation Lines, Inc. (the “Registrant”), dohereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

1.            The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ended September30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

2.            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GaselTransportation Lines, Inc. and will be retained by Gasel Transportation Lines,Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 
| Dated: | November  19, 2004 |   | By:                                                                     | /s/   S. Gene Thompson |
|--------|--------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|   |               |   | S.  Gene Thompson,   Vice   President & Chief   Financial   Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 11.01

                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


                                                     YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,
                                              ----------------------------------
     EARNINGS                                      2000         1999        1998
                                                   ----         ----        ----

     Net income (loss) (in thousands)          $(3,207)         $854      $4,485
                                               ========     ========    ========


     WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES

     Outstanding common stock during
       the period                             4,933,900    4,933,900   4,066,524
     Contingently issuable shares                74,251       44,714           -

     BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF         ---------    ---------   ---------
       SHARES                                 5,008,151    4,978,614   4,066,524

     Effect of dilutive stock options
       and other contingent shares                    -       11,347      20,942

     DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF       ---------    ---------   ---------
       SHARES                                 5,008,151    4,989,961   4,087,466

                                                =======        =====       =====
     Basic earnings per share                   $(0.64)        $0.17       $1.10

                                                =======        =====       =====
     Diluted earning per share                  $(0.64)        $0.17       $1.10

                                                =======        =====       =====



During the  year-ended  June 30, 2000,  the Company  issued  options to purchase
20,000  shares of its common  stock at  exercise  prices  ranging  from $7.50 to
$9.25. The above dilutive earnings per share calculations  exclude the effect of
options to  purchase  330,500  and 45,000 for the years  ended June 30, 2000 and
1999, respectively, shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $7.50
to  $12.00  because  they  were  anti-dilutive.  Also  see  Note  7  related  to
contingently issuable shares related to an acquisition. The effect of contingent
shares related to the guaranteed  earn-out amount not paid at the closing of the
Sunbelt  acquisition  and the effect of  satisfactory  completion of part of the
second  contingent  earn-out has been  included in the above basic  earnings per
share  calculations.  The  effect  of  contingent  shares  related  to the first
earn-out of American Micro is not included,  as such payment was paid in cash in
March  2000.  The effect of  contingent  shares  related to second  earn-out  of
American Micro is not included,  as the amount of such  contingent  shares to be
issued is unable to be  determined.  See note 19 to the  Consolidated  Financial
Statements.
#### The State, ex rel. Gladman, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio.

(No. 27775

Decided November 29, 1939.)

*91
      *Mr. Samuel T. Kelly,*for relator.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. E. P. Felker,*for respondent.

By the Court.

Counsel for relator in his brief states that this action is based upon Section 871-38, General Code.

The demurrer will be sustained and a writ of mandamus denied.

Section 871-38, General Code, is inapplicable. *Bowes*v. *Industrial Commission,*123 Ohio St., 155, 174 N. E., 357; *State, ex rel. Nichols,*v. *Gregory et al., Industrial Commission,*130 Ohio St., 165, 198 N. E., 182; *U. S.*
      *92
      *Wall Paper Co.*v. *Industrial Commission,*132 Ohio St., 372, 7 N. E. (2d), 798.

Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. *State, ex rel. Barner,*v. *Marsh,*120 Ohio St., 222, 165 N. E., 843.

The writ will issue to control discretion only where there is an abuse thereof *(State, ex rel. Gilder,*v. *Industrial Commission,*100 Ohio St., 500, 127 N. E., 595; *State, ex rel. Stahl,*v. *Industrial Commission,*135 Ohio St., 168, 20 N. E. [2d], 347); where there is a duty specially enjoined by law (Section 12283, General Code); and where there is no adequate remedy at law (Section 12287, General Code).

The Industrial Commission has exclusive authority to determine all questions within its jurisdiction *State, ex rel. Depalo,*v. *Industrial Commission,*128 Ohio St., 410, 191 N. E., 691; Section 1465-90, General Code. The last named section provides an adequate remedy at law in the event compensation is denied upon a ground enumerated therein.

*Writ denied.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.