54456 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2011 / Notices 

1For editorial reasons, upon codification in the 

U.S. Code, part B was re-designated part A. 

target for an act of terrorism or sabotage. 

Further, as discussed in the Final EIS, 

the site security measures provide 

appropriate levels of security to protect 

electrical infrastructure from malicious 

mischief, vandalism, or domestic/ 

foreign terrorist attacks. 

Decision 

DOE has decided to issue a loan 

guarantee for construction and startup 

of GSEP under the Dry Cooling 

Alternative, as described in the Final 

EIS and BLM ROD. 

Approval of the loan guarantee for 

GSEP responds to the DOE purpose and 

need pursuant to Section 1705 of EPAct 

2005 (42 U.S.C. 16511–16514), which 

was added to EPAct 2005 by the 

Recovery Act. Section 1705 authorizes a 

program for rapid deployment of 

renewable energy projects and related 

manufacturing facilities, electric power 

transmission projects, and leading-edge 

biofuels projects. The primary purposes 

of the Recovery Act are job preservation 

and creation, infrastructure investment, 

energy efficiency and science, assistance 

to the unemployed, and state and local 

fiscal stabilization. The Section 1705 

program is designed to address the 

economic conditions of the Nation, in 

part, through renewable energy, 

transmission, and leading-edge biofuels 

projects. Eligible projects must 

commence construction by September 

30, 2011. 

Mitigation 

The GSEP project for which DOE has 

decided to issue a loan guarantee 

includes mitigation measures, terms, 

and conditions applied by BLM in its 

ROW. The mitigation measures, terms, 

and conditions represent practicable 

means to avoid or minimize 

environmental impacts from the 

selected alternative (the Dry Cooling 

Alternative). BLM is lead Federal 

agency for the GSEP project under 

NEPA and is responsible for ensuring 

compliance with all adopted mitigation 

measures, terms, and conditions for the 

GSEP project set forth in the Final EIS 

and ROD. The complete language of the 

mitigation measures, terms, and 

conditions is provided in Appendix G of 

the Final EIS, and the Compliance 

Monitoring Plan is provided in 

Appendix 6 of the BLM ROD. BLM has 

also incorporated the mitigation 

measures, terms, and conditions into the 

ROW as terms and conditions. 

The DOE loan guarantee agreement 

requires that the applicant comply with 

all applicable laws and the terms of the 

ROW, including mitigation measures. 

An applicant’s failure to comply with 

applicable laws and the ROW would 

constitute a default. Upon continuance 

of a default, DOE would have the right 

under the loan guarantee agreement 

between DOE and the applicant to 

exercise usual and customary remedies. 

To ensure that the applicant so 

performs, the Loan Programs Office 

monitors all operative loan guarantee 

transactions. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on August 25, 

2011. 

Jonathan M. Silver, 

Executive Director, Loan Programs Office. 

[FR Doc. 2011–22403 Filed 8–31–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–10–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Office of Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy 

[Case No. RF–019] 

Petition for Waiver and Notice of 

Granting the Application for Interim 

Waiver of Samsung from the 

Department of Energy Residential 

Refrigerator and Refrigerator-Freezer 

Test Procedure 

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy, Department of 

Energy. 

ACTION: Notice of Petition for Waiver 

and Request for Public Comments. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt 

of and publishes the Samsung 

Electronics America, Inc. (Samsung) 

petition for waiver (hereafter, 

‘‘petition’’) from specified portions of 

the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 

test procedure for determining the 

energy consumption of electric 

refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers. 

The waiver request pertains to certain 

basic models in Samsung’s product 

lines that incorporate multiple defrost 

cycles. In its petition, Samsung provides 

an alternate test procedure that is the 

same as the test procedure DOE 

published in an interim final rule. DOE 

solicits comments, data, and 

information concerning Samsung’s 

petition and the suggested alternate test 

procedure. DOE also publishes notice of 

the grant of an interim waiver to 

Samsung. 

DATES: DOE will accept comments, data, 

and information with respect to the 

Samsung Petition until, but no later 

than October 3, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by case number ‘‘RF–019,’’ by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• E-mail: AS_Waiver_Requests@ee. 

doe.gov Include the case number [Case 

No. RF–017] in the subject line of the 

message. 

• Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. 

Department of Energy, Building 

Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J/ 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20585–0121. 

Telephone: (202) 586–2945. Please 

submit one signed original paper copy. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda 

Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, 

Building Technologies Program, 950 

L’Enfant Plaza SW., Suite 600, 

Washington, DC 20024. Please submit 

one signed original paper copy. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

review the background documents 

relevant to this matter, you may visit the 

U.S. Department of Energy, 950 L’Enfant 

Plaza SW., (Resource Room of the 

Building Technologies Program), 

Washington, DC, 20024; (202) 586–2945, 

between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

Available documents include the 

following items: (1) This notice; (2) 

public comments received; (3) the 

petition for waiver and application for 

interim waiver; and (4) prior DOE 

rulemakings regarding similar 

refrigerator-freezers. Please call Ms. 

Brenda Edwards at the above telephone 

number for additional information 

regarding visiting the Resource Room. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

Michael G. Raymond, U.S. Department 

of Energy, Building Technologies 

Program, Mail Stop EE–2J, Forrestal 

Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, 

SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121. 

Telephone: (202) 586–9611. E-mail: 

Michael.Raymond@ee.doe.gov. 

Ms. Elizabeth Kohl, U.S. Department 

of Energy, Office of the General Counsel, 

Mail Stop GC–71, Forrestal Building, 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20585–0103. 

Telephone: (202) 586–7796. E-mail: 

Elizabeth.Kohl@hq.doe.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background and Authority 

Title III, part B of the Energy Policy 

and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA), 

Public Law 94–163 (42 U.S.C. 6291– 

6309, as codified, established the Energy 

Conservation Program for Consumer 

Products Other Than Automobiles, a 

program covering most major household 

appliances, which includes the electric 

refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers 

that are the focus of this notice.1 Part B 

includes definitions, test procedures, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2011 / Notices 54457 

labeling provisions, energy conservation 

standards, and the authority to require 

information and reports from 

manufacturers. Further, part B 

authorizes the Secretary of Energy to 

prescribe test procedures that are 

reasonably designed to produce results 

which measure the energy efficiency, 

energy use, or estimated annual 

operating costs of a covered product, 

and that are not unduly burdensome to 

conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) The test 

procedure for automatic electric 

refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers is 

contained in 10 CFR part 430, subpart 

B, appendix A1. 

DOE’s regulations for covered 

products contain provisions allowing a 

person to seek a waiver for a particular 

basic model from the test procedure 

requirements for covered consumer 

products when (1) The petitioner’s basic 

model for which the petition for waiver 

was submitted contains one or more 

design characteristics that prevent 

testing according to the prescribed test 

procedure, or (2) when prescribed test 

procedures may evaluate the basic 

model in a manner so unrepresentative 

of its true energy consumption 

characteristics as to provide materially 

inaccurate comparative data. 10 CFR 

430.27(a)(1). Petitioners must include in 

their petition any alternate test 

procedures known to the petitioner to 

evaluate the basic model in a manner 

representative of its energy 

consumption characteristics. 10 CFR 

430.27(b)(1)(iii). 

The Assistant Secretary for Energy 

Efficiency and Renewable Energy (the 

Assistant Secretary) may grant a waiver 

subject to conditions, including 

adherence to alternate test procedures. 

10 CFR 430.27(l). Waivers remain in 

effect pursuant to the provisions of 10 

CFR 430.27(m). 

Any interested person who has 

submitted a petition for waiver may also 

file an application for interim waiver of 

the applicable test procedure 

requirements. 10 CFR 430.27(a)(2). The 

Assistant Secretary will grant an interim 

waiver request if it is determined that 

the applicant will experience economic 

hardship if the interim waiver is denied, 

if it appears likely that the petition for 

waiver will be granted, and/or the 

Assistant Secretary determines that it 

would be desirable for public policy 

reasons to grant immediate relief 

pending a determination on the petition 

for waiver. 10 CFR 430.27(g). 

II. Petition for Waiver of Test Procedure 

On July 19, 2011, Samsung filed a 

petition for waiver for new refrigeratorfreezer models from the test procedure 

applicable to residential electric 

refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers set 

forth in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, 

Appendix A1. Samsung is designing 

new refrigerator-freezers that 

incorporate multiple defrost cycles. In 

its petition, Samsung seeks a waiver 

from the existing DOE test procedure 

applicable to refrigerators and 

refrigerator-freezers under 10 CFR part 

430 because the existing test procedure 

does not account for multiple defrost 

cycles. Therefore, Samsung has asked to 

use an alternate test procedure that is 

the same as the test procedure DOE 

published in an interim final rule (75 FR 

78810, December 16, 2010). On January 

27, 2011, Samsung had filed a similar 

petition for waiver and request for 

interim waiver for other basic models of 

refrigerator-freezers that incorporate 

multiple defrost cycles. 

III. Application for Interim Waiver 

Samsung also requests an interim 

waiver from the existing DOE test 

procedure. Under 10 CFR 430.27(b)(2), 

each application for interim waiver 

must demonstrate likely success of the 

Petition for Waiver and address the 

economic hardship and/or competitive 

disadvantage that is likely to result 

absent a favorable determination on the 

application for interim waiver.’’ An 

interim waiver may be granted if it is 

determined that the applicant will 

experience economic hardship if the 

application for interim waiver is denied; 

if it appears likely that the petition for 

waiver will be granted; and/or the 

Assistant Secretary determines that it 

would be desirable for public policy 

reasons to grant immediate relief 

pending a determination of the petition 

for waiver. 10 CFR 430.27(g). 

DOE has determined that Samsung’s 

application for interim waiver does not 

provide sufficient market, equipment 

price, shipments and other 

manufacturer impact information to 

permit DOE to evaluate the economic 

hardship Samsung might experience 

absent a favorable determination on its 

application for interim waiver. DOE 

understands, however, that absent an 

interim waiver, Samsung’s products 

would not be accurately tested and rated 

for energy consumption because the 

current energy test procedure does not 

include test procedures for products 

with multiple defrost cycle types. 

Therefore, it appears likely that 

Samsung’s petition for waiver will be 

granted. In addition, it is desirable for 

public policy reasons to grant 

immediate relief pending a decision on 

the petition for waiver. DOE previously 

granted a waiver to Samsung for other 

basic models incorporating multiple 

defrost technology. In addition, DOE’s 

test procedure interim final rule would 

resolve the technical issues in this 

waiver, but use of the test procedure 

would not be required until the 

compliance date of any amended 

standards (approximately 2014). (75 FR 

78810, December 16, 2010). 

For the reasons stated above, DOE 

grants Samsung’s application for interim 

waiver from testing of its refrigeratorfreezer product line containing relative 

humidity sensors and adaptive control 

anti-sweat heaters. Therefore, it is 

ordered that: 

The application for interim waiver 

filed by Samsung is hereby granted for 

Samsung’s refrigerator-freezer product 

lines that incorporate multiple defrost 

cycles subject to the specifications and 

conditions below. 

1. Samsung shall not be required to 

test or rate its refrigerator-freezer 

product lines that incorporate multiple 

defrost cycles on the basis of the test 

procedure under 10 CFR part 430 

subpart B, appendix A1. 

2. Samsung shall be required to test 

and rate its refrigerator-freezer product 

line containing relative humidity 

sensors and adaptive control anti-sweat 

heaters according to the alternate test 

procedure as set forth in section IV, 

‘‘Alternate test procedure.’’ 

The interim waiver applies to the 

following basic model groups: 

DFSF9VKB**** GFSF6PKB  GFSS6PKB** ** 

GFSF6PKBBB GFSS6PKBSS GFSF6PKBWW 

DFSS9VKB  

DOE makes decisions on waivers and 

interim waivers for only those models 

specifically set out in the petition, not 

future models that may be manufactured 

by the petitioner. Samsung may submit 

a new or amended petition for waiver 

and request for grant of interim waiver, 

as appropriate, for additional models of 

refrigerator-freezers for which it seeks a 

waiver from the DOE test procedure. In 

addition, DOE notes that grant of an 

interim waiver or waiver does not 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
54458 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2011 / Notices 

release a petitioner from the 

certification requirements set forth at 10 

CFR part 429. 

Further, this interim waiver is 

conditioned upon the presumed validity 

of statements, representations, and 

documents provided by the petitioner. 

DOE may revoke or modify this interim 

waiver at any time upon a 

determination that the factual basis 

underlying the petition for waiver is 

incorrect, or upon a determination that 

the results from the alternate test 

procedure are unrepresentative of the 

basic models’ true energy consumption 

characteristics. 

IV. Alternate Test Procedure 

For the duration of the interim 

waiver, Samsung shall be required to 

test the products listed above according 

to the test procedures for residential 

electric refrigerator-freezers prescribed 

by DOE at 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, 

Appendix A1, except that, for the 

Samsung products listed above only, 

include: 

1. In section 1, Definitions, the 

following definition at the end: 

‘‘Defrost cycle type’’ means a distinct 

sequence of control whose function is to 

remove frost and/or ice from a 

refrigerated surface. There may be 

variations in the defrost control 

sequence such as the number of defrost 

heaters energized. Each such variation 

establishes a separate distinct defrost 

cycle type. However, defrost achieved 

regularly during the compressor offcycles by warming of the evaporator 

without active heat addition is not a 

defrost cycle type. 

2. In section 4, Test Period, the 

following at the end: 

Systems with Multiple Defrost 

Frequencies. This section applies to 

models with long-time automatic or 

variable defrost control with multiple 

defrost cycle types, such as models with 

single compressors and multiple 

evaporators in which the evaporators 

have different defrost frequencies. A 

two-part method shall be used. The first 

part is a stable period of compressor 

operation that includes no portions of 

the defrost cycle, such as precooling or 

recovery, that is otherwise the same as 

the test for a unit having no defrost 

provisions. The second part is designed 

to capture the energy consumed during 

all of the events occurring with the 

defrost control sequence that are outside 

of stable operation, and will be 

conducted separately for each distinct 

defrost cycle type. For defrost cycle 

types involving the defrosting of both 

fresh food and freezer compartments, 

the freezer compartment temperature 

shall be used to determine test period 

start and stop times. 

3. In section 5, Test Measurements, 

the following at the end: 

Long-time or Variable Defrost Control 

for Systems with Multiple Defrost cycle 

Types. 

The energy consumption in kilowatthours per day shall be calculated 

equivalent to: 

V. Summary and Request for Comments 

Through today’s notice, DOE grants 

Samsung an interim waiver from the 

specified portions of the test procedure 

applicable to Samsung’s new line of 

refrigerator-freezers with multiple 

defrost cycles and announces receipt of 

Samsung’s petition for waiver from 

those same portions of the test 

procedure. DOE publishes Samsung’s 

petition for waiver pursuant to 10 CFR 

430.27(b)(1)(iv). The petition includes a 

suggested alternate test procedure and 

calculation methodology to determine 

the energy consumption of Samsung’s 

specified refrigerator-freezers with 

multiple defrost cycles. Samsung is 

required to follow this alternate 

procedure as a condition of its interim 

waiver, and DOE is considering 

including this alternate procedure in its 

subsequent Decision and Order. 

DOE solicits comments from 

interested parties on all aspects of the 

petition, including the suggested 

alternate test procedure and calculation 

methodology. Pursuant to 10 CFR 

430.27(b)(1)(iv), any person submitting 

written comments to DOE must also 

send a copy of such comments to the 

petitioner. The contact information for 

the petitioner is: Michael Moss, Director 

of Corporate Environmental Affairs, 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 

18600 Broadwick St., Rancho 

Dominguez, CA 90220. All submissions 

received must include the agency name 

and case number for this proceeding. 

Submit electronic comments in 

WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, Portable 

Document Format (PDF), or text 

(American Standard Code for 

Information Interchange (ASCII)) file 

format and avoid the use of special 

characters or any form of encryption. 

Wherever possible, include the 

electronic signature of the author. DOE 

does not accept telefacsimiles (faxes). 

According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any 

person submitting information that he 

or she believes to be confidential and 

exempt by law from public disclosure 

should submit two copies to DOE: one 

copy of the document including all the 

information believed to be confidential, 

and one copy of the document with the 

information believed to be confidential 

deleted. DOE will make its own 

determination about the confidential 

status of the information and treat it 

according to its determination. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on August 25, 

2011. 

Kathleen B. Hogan, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy 

Efficiency, Office of Technology 

Development, Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy. 

July 19, 2011 

Dr. Henry Kelly 

Energy Efficiency and Renewable 

Energy 

Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20585 

Dear Assistant Secretary Kelly: 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 

(‘‘Samsung’’) respectfully submits this 

request Application for Interim Waiver 

and Petition for Waiver to the 

Department of Energy (‘‘DOE’’ or ‘‘the 

Department’’) for single compressor 

refrigerator-freezers with multiple 

defrost cycles that are manufactured by 

Samsung. 

Reasoning 

10 CFR Part 430.27(a)(1) allows a 

person to submit a petition to waive for 

a particular basic model any 

requirements of § 430.23 upon the 

grounds that the basic model contains 

one or more design characteristics 

which either prevent testing of the basic 

model according to the prescribed test 

procedures, or the prescribed test 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICESEN01SE11.009</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 170 / Thursday, September 1, 2011 / Notices 54459 

2 DOE understands, however, that absent an 

interim waiver, Samsung’s products would not be 

accurately tested and rated for energy consumption 

because the current energy test procedure does not 

include test procedures for products with multiple 

defrost cycle types. 

3Until these amendments are required in 

conjunction with the 2014 standards, manufacturers 

introducing products equipped with multiple 

defrost cycle types should, consistent with 10 CFR 

430.27, petition for a waiver since the modified 

version of Appendix A1 set out in today’s notice 

will not include a specified method for capturing 

this energy usage. 

procedures may evaluate the basic 

model in a manner so unrepresentative 

of its true energy consumption 

characteristics as to provide materially 

inaccurate comparative data. 

Current test procedures as prescribed 

in Appendix A1 to Subpart B of Part 430 

(‘‘Appendix A1’’) do not adequately 

provide a way for Samsung to accurately 

represent the energy consumption of its 

refrigerator-freezers with multiple 

defrost cycles. DOE concurred with 

Samsung’s understanding in the interim 

waiver granted to Samsung in 76 FR 

16760.2 Additionally, DOE 

communicated that all manufacturers 

planning on marketing refrigeratorfreezers with multiple defrost cycles 

must seek a waiver from the 

Department.3

Request 

In 75 FR 78810 (December 16, 2010), 

DOE issued an interim final rule for 

Appendix A (‘‘Appendix A’’), that 

effectively addresses test methodologies 

for refrigerator-freezers with multiple 

defrost cycles. Samsung requests that 

the Appendix A test methodology be 

expeditiously granted for Samsung 

refrigerator-freezers with multiple 

defrost cycles. Meanwhile, Samsung 

believes for the time being that the 

existing energy efficiency limits are 

adequate. Samsung therefore does not 

seek an alternate energy efficiency limit 

for these models at this time. Samsung 

requests that the efficient limits under 

§ 430.32(a) are applied to the following 

Samsung manufactured basic models: 

DFSF9VKB** ** GFSF6PKB  GFSS6PKB** ** 

GFSF6PKBBB GFSS6PKBSS GFSF6PKBWW 

DFSS9VKB**** 

Please feel free to contact me if you 

have any questions regarding this 

Petition for Waiver and Application for 

Interim Waiver. I will be happy to 

discuss should any questions arise. 

Sincerely, 

Michael Moss, 

Director of Corporate Environmental 

Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 2011–22399 Filed 8–31–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

Combined Notice of Filings #1 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric corporate 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: EC11–108–000. 

Applicants: ITC Great Plains, LLC. 

Description: Section 203 Application 

for approval of acquisition of 

substations of ITC Great Plains, LLC. 

Filed Date: 08/23/2011. 

Accession Number: 20110823–5114. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, September 13, 2011. 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric rate 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: ER10–2972–001. 

Applicants: Midwest Independent 

Transmission System Operator, Inc. 

Description: Midwest Independent 

Transmission System Operator, Inc. 

submits tariff filing per 35: ATC–LSP 

GIA—Settlement Filing to be effective 

10/23/2011. 

Filed Date: 08/23/2011. 

Accession Number: 20110823–5068. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, September 13, 2011. 

Docket Numbers: ER11–2794–003. 

Applicants: Midwest Independent 

Transmission System Operator, Inc. 

Description: Midwest Independent 

Transmission System Operator, Inc. 

submits tariff filing per 35: 08–23–11 

Compliance with Errata Notice to be 

effective 4/1/2011. 

Filed Date: 08/23/2011. 

Accession Number: 20110823–5072. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Thursday, August 25, 2011. 

Docket Numbers: ER11–4352–001. 

Applicants: Arizona Public Service 

Company. 

Description: Arizona Public Service 

Company submits tariff filing per 

35.17(b): Amendment to metadata for 

APS Service Agreement No. 312 to be 

effective 10/21/2011. 

Filed Date: 08/23/2011. 

Accession Number: 20110823–5045. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, September 13, 2011. 

Docket Numbers: ER11–4354–000. 

Applicants: Arizona Public Service 

Company. 

Description: Arizona Public Service 

Company submits tariff filing per 35.15: 

Cancellation of APS Service Agreement 

No. 310 to be effective 10/21/2011. 

Filed Date: 08/23/2011. 

Accession Number: 20110823–5046. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, September 13, 2011. 

Docket Numbers: ER11–4355–000. 

Applicants: TPW Petersburg, LLC. 

Description: TPW Petersburg, LLC 

submits tariff filing per 35.12: TPW 

Petersburg, LLC Rate Schedule FERC 

No. 1 to be effective 9/30/2011. 

Filed Date: 08/23/2011. 

Accession Number: 20110823–5063. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, September 13, 2011. 

Docket Numbers: ER11–4356–000. 

Applicants: PJM Interconnection, 

L.L.C. 

Description: PJM Interconnection, 

L.L.C. submits tariff filing per 35.15: 

Notice of Cancellation of Service 

Agreement No. 2822 in Docket No. 

ER11–3238–000 to be effective 7/21/ 

2011. 

Filed Date: 08/23/2011. 

Accession Number: 20110823–5070. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, September 13, 2011. 

Docket Numbers: ER11–4357–000. 

Applicants: Marathon Power LLC. 

Description: Marathon Power LLC 

submits tariff filing per 35.12: Marathon 

Power LLC Market-Based Rate Tariff to 

be effective 8/23/2011. 

Filed Date: 08/23/2011. 

Accession Number: 20110823–5075. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, September 13, 2011. 

Docket Numbers: ER11–4359–000. 

Applicants: Florida Power 

Corporation. 

Description: Notice of Cancellation of 

Rate Schedule No. 127 of Florida Power 

Corporation. 

Filed Date: 08/23/2011. 

Accession Number: 20110823–5076. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, September 13, 2011. 

Docket Numbers: ER11–4360–000. 

Applicants: Florida Power 

Corporation. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES