alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w01



 






Exhibit 10.01




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE FISHER SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL INC.

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS



The Board of Directors of Fisher Scientific International Inc. hereby amends the Fisher Scientific
International Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “Plan”), effective as
of March 1, 2006, as follows:





	1.	 	The second sentence of Subparagraph 2(a) is hereby amended by replacing the word “as” with
the word “was.”
	 
	2.	 	The first paragraph of Section 3 is hereby amended by adding the following sentence thereto,
which shall be inserted after the first sentence of such Section:




“Such amounts shall be denominated in cash or in shares of the Corporation’s common stock
(“Shares”), in accordance with the Director’s election.”





	3.	 	The last sentence of the first paragraph of Section 3 is hereby restated in its entirety, as
follows:




“The Director shall not have any interest in the amounts or Shares credited to his account until
they are distributed in accordance with the Plan.”





	4.	 	The first sentence of the second paragraph of Section 3 is amended by inserting the words
“and denominated in cash” between the words “to the Director’s account” and “shall accrue
amounts” therein.
	 
	5.	 	A new third paragraph is hereby added to Section 3, as follows:




“Amounts credited to the Director’s account and denominated in Shares shall be determined by
dividing the amount of the deferred compensation elected to be deferred in the form of Shares by
the closing price of the Shares on the New York Stock Exchange on the last trading day of the
calendar quarter with respect to which such compensation is payable (with any fractional amounts
being denominated in cash). No interest shall accrue with respect to amounts deferred in Shares.
Any cash dividends and/or special dividends and distributions with respect to such shares shall be
credited to the Director’s account in cash.





	6.	 	Subparagraphs 4(a) and 4(b) of the Plan are hereby amended by adding the words “or Shares”
between the words “amount of cash” and “credited to the” in the first sentence of each such
subparagraph.
	 
	7.	 	Paragraph 5 of the Plan is hereby re-titled “DISTRIBUTION ON DEATH.”
	 
	8.	 	Subparagraph 6(b) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the words “or Shares” between the
words “set aside funds” and “for the payment” therein.





1









 






	9.	 	Subparagraph 6(d) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the words “of cash or Shares”
between the words “with respect to amounts” and “then in the Director’s account” therein.
	 
	10.	 	Subparagraph 6(e) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the words “of cash or Shares”
between the words “indicating the amount” and “credited to the” therein.






2
#### Mike ALVAREZ, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 24037.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 31, 1948.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.'

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is assault with intent to murder; the penalty, two years in the penitentiary.

The appellant moves to withdraw his appeal and has filed his personal affidavit supporting the motion.

The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Kenneth D. King and Judith King, by and through Judith King, Independent Executor of the Estate of Kenneth King, deceased v.

Deu tsche Bank National Trust Company, a s Indenture Trustee, on behalf of the Owners of Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 20 04

- 4 Asset Backed notes, By it s Attorney

- In

- Fact and Servicer in

- fact, select Portfolio Servicing, Inc

.

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 01091

- CV

Trial court case number: 2012

- 36457

Trial court: 281st District Court of Harris County

Appellants have filed a M otion to Supplement Appellants’ Brief, requesting that we permit the supplementation of their brief and take judi cial notice of records filed in the Fourteenth Court of App eals. A ppellee has filed a response in opposition.

Appellants’ motion is granted in part; Appellants may file a supplemental brief with records, as described in their motion, within 10 days of the date of this order. Appellants’ request that we take judi cial notice of the records to be attached is carried with the case , and will be determined upon submission.

Should appellee wish to file a responsive supplemental brief, any such brief will be due no later than 30 days from the date appellants’ supplemen tal brief is filed.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 24, 2014
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 that a meeting of the Veterans' Advisory Committee on Environmental hazards will be held on Wednesday and Thursday, November 29-30, 2000, in room 430 of VA Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20420. The meting will convene at 9:00 a.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on both days.

                    The purpose of the meeting is to review information relating to the health effects of exposure to ionizing radiation. The major items on the agenda for both days will be discussions and analyses of medical and scientific papers concerning the health effects of                           ( print page 64744)                        exposure to ionizing radiation. On the basis of their analyses and discussions, the Committee may make recommendations to the Secretary concerning diseases that are the result of exposure to ionizing radiation. The agenda for the second day will include planning future Committee activities and assignment of tasks among the members.                

The meeting is open to the public on both days. Those who wish to attend should contact Ersie Farber-Collins of the Department of Veterans Affairs, Compensation and Pension Service, 810 Vermont Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20420, prior to November 27, 2000. Ms. Farber-Collins may also be reached at 202-273-7268.

Members of the public may submit written questions or prepared statements for review by the Advisory Committee in advance of the meeting. Submitted material must be received at least five (5) days prior to the meeting and should be sent to Ms. Farber-Collins' attention at the address given above. Those who submit material may be asked to clarify it prior to its consideration by the Advisory Committee.

Dated: October 23, 2000.

By Direction of the Secretary.

Marvin Eason, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-27727  Filed 10-27-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 321 

To amend the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2013 (Public Law 112– 

175) to permit research on firearms safety and gun violence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2013 

Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. 

LEVIN, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, 

Mr. RANGEL, Ms. SPEIER, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. SCHWARTZ, Mr. 

CAPUANO, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. ELLISON, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. MORAN, Ms. MOORE, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. CICILLINE, 

Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. CHU, Ms. MATSUI, Ms. NORTON, Mr. QUIGLEY, 

Mr. HOLT, Mr. HIMES, Mr. SCHIFF, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. DOYLE, Ms. 

EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Ms. PINGREE

of Maine, and Ms. LOFGREN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2013 

(Public Law 112–175) to permit research on firearms 

safety and gun violence. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 The Act may be cited as the ‘‘Firearm Safety and 

5 Public Health Research Act of 2013’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 321 IH

1 SEC. 2. PERMITTING THE USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR RE2 SEARCH ON FIREARMS SAFETY AND GUN VIO3 LENCE. 

4 The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2013 

5 (Public Law 112–175) is amended by inserting after sec6 tion 155 the following: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 156. Notwithstanding section 101, sections 

8 218 and 503(c) of division F of the Consolidated Appro9 priations Act, 2012 (Public Law 112–74) shall not apply 

10 to amounts made available by this joint resolution insofar 

11 as such sections relate to any activity to conduct research 

12 on firearms safety or gun violence.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134926 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134926 COA: 268659 Calhoun CC: 2005-000937-FH ANDREW DAVID SHELDON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 21, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 8, 2008

Clerk
Order entered October 21, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00944-CV

CORINTH INVESTOR HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellant

V.

MARK BENNETT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-12135

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s October 15, 2015 unopposed motion for an extension of time to 

file a brief. Appellee shall file a brief by NOVEMBER 9, 2015. We caution appellee that no 

further extension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordinary 

circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3293 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3293

                    To reform the public debt limit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 15, 2013

   Mr. Hastings of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    To reform the public debt limit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Debt Limit Reform Act''.

SEC. 2. REFORM OF THE PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT.

    (a) Authority of President To Increase Public Debt Limit.--Section 
3101 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection:
    ``(d) The dollar amount in effect under subsection (b) shall be 
increased at such times and in such amounts as the President of the 
United States, or his designee, may provide.''.
    (b) Government-Held Debt Not Taken Into Account for Purposes of the 
Public Debt Limit.--Section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, as 
amended by subsection (a) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new subsection:
    ``(e) Obligations held by the United States Government (including 
any obligation which is classified as an intragovernmental holding by 
the Secretary of the Treasury or which is held by any agency or 
instrumentality of the United States) shall not be taken into account 
for purposes of applying the limitation imposed under subsection 
(b).''.
                                 <all>
```
March 26, 2013

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting Notes for the March 5, 2013 Conference Call with Airtek

FROM: Kelley Spence (EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD/NRG)

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0640

This memorandum summarizes the conference call between Airtek and the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) on March 5, 2013. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss electrostatic precipitator 

(ESP) operation and parametric monitoring. 

Meeting Attendees:

John Roberts – Airtek

Al Johnson – Airtek

John Bradfield – EPA/SPPD

Kelley Spence – EPA/SPPD

Discussion Points:

Electrostatic precipitator operation and parametric monitoring were discussed. Monitoring parameters 

such as power and opacity were discussed. It was noted that opacity is the better measure of ESP 

efficiency and that reduced power doesn’t always correlate with more emissions. Representatives noted 

that a good correlation between PM concentration and opacity exists for each unit. It was also noted that 

it is important to look at total power when monitoring electrical conditions (current and power), instead of 

using the parameters as stand-alone assessments of unit operation.
#### Cumberland Farms, Inc. vs. Planning Board of West Bridgewater.

No. 04-P-970.

August 16, 2005.

*Subdivision Control,*Decision of planning board, Plan, Approval of plan, Approval not required.

The judge correctly reversed the action of West Bridgewater’s planning board refusing to endorse the plaintiff’s “perimeter plan” under G. L. c. 41, § 8 IP, as one not requiring approval under the Subdivision Control Law. (The parties refer to the plan as a “perimeter plan”; it does, however, alter boundary lines by consolidating several lots owned by the plaintiff into a single lot.) The plaintiff acknowledges that the plan was submitted to forestall application of a proposed zoning provision prohibiting gasoline service stations in the zoning district by invoking the three-year zoning freeze under G. L. c. 40A, § 6. The plaintiff’s motivation, however, was irrelevant to the decision before the board, *Long*v. *Board of Appeals of Falmouth,*32 Mass. App. Ct. 232, 236 (1992); *Bisson*v. *Planning Bd. of Dover,*43 Mass. App. Ct. 504, 508 (1997); *Kindercare Learning Centers, Inc.*v. *Westford,*62 Mass. App. Ct. 924, 925 (2004), and the argument that perimeter plans, because they do not contain new lines indicating a division of land, are ineligible for submission and endorsement under § 8 IP flies in the face of decades of contrary practice. See, e.g., *Cape Ann Land Dev. Corp.*v. *Gloucester,*371 Mass. 19, 20-23 (1976); *Wolk*v. *Planning Bd. of Stoughton, 4*Mass. App. Ct. 812 (1976); *903
      *Samson*v. *San-Land Dev. Corp.,*17 Mass. App. Ct. 977, 978 (1984); *Stampfl*v. *Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Norwood,*33 Mass. App. Ct. 354, 355-356 (1992); *Reagan*v. *Planning Bd. of Braintree,*37 Mass. App. Ct. 956, 957 & n.2 (1994); *Stefanick*v. *Planning Bd. of Uxbridge,*39 Mass. App. Ct. 418, 419 (1995).

*Maureen A. JLee*for the defendant.

*Richard C. Dailey (Amy L. Hanson*with him) for the plaintiff.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-38,073] 

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on September 11, 2000 in response to a worker petition which was filed on behalf of workers at Wolverine World Wide, Incorporated, Rockford, Michigan.

The investigation revealed that an active certification covering the petitioning group of workers remains in effect (TA-W-35,149). That certification expires on January 25, 2001. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 12th day of October 2000.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-27569  Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this Amendment
(this Amendment) on Form 10-K/ A to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Horizon Medical Products, Inc.
(the Corporation) for the period ended
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 30, 2004, the undersigned, the
President, Chief Operating Officer and Interim Chief Executive
Officer of the Corporation, hereby certifies:



| |                                                                                                                                                                         
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) This Amendment fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
|
| | (2) The information contained in this
    Amendment fairly presents, in all material respects, the
    financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



| |                                    
| | -----------------------------------
| | /s/ ROBERT J. WENZEL               
| |                                    
| | Robert J. Wenzel                   
| | President, Chief Operating Officer 
| | and Interim Chief Executive Officer

April 29, 2004

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Horizon Medical Products, Inc. and will be retained by
Horizon Medical Products, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Schedule of documents substantially similar to Exhibit 10.38



 EXHIBIT 10.39 
 Schedule of documents substantially similar to Exhibit 10.38 
  

	1.	Employment Agreement between Kitchin Hospitality, LLC and W. David Vining dated August 12, 2005 

  

	2.	Employment Agreement between Kitchin Hospitality, LLC and Jeffrey A. Hurley dated August 19, 2005 

  

	3.	Amended Employment Agreement between Kitchin Hospitality, LLC and D. Anthony Maness dated February 25, 2005
----

----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                              |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Tammy-Lynn      McNabb   |   |
|   |   | Tammy-Lynn      McNabb,           |   |
|   |   | Chief Financial      Officer |   |
|   |   | April      14, 2008               |   |

----
**Exhibit 23.01**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

The Board of Directors 

Click2learn, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (No. 333-51858, 333-87425, 333-89615, 333-75480 and 333-107260) on Form S-3 and registration statements (Nos. 333-68413, 333-83759, 333-42822, 333-63916, and 333-97877) on Form S-8 of Click2learn, Inc. and subsidiaries of ourreport dated January 31, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Click2learn, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and 2002 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cashflows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002 and the related consolidated financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Click2learn, Inc. Our report refersto a change in the method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Seattle, Washington 

February 10, 2004
Amended Schedule 2.1 to the Directors' Deferred Compensation & Benefits Trust Ag



 Exhibit 10.16 
 Schedule 2.1 
 to the 
 Directors’ Deferred Compensation and Benefits 
 Trust Agreement

 Benefit Plans and Other Arrangements Subject to Trust 
 (1) Sunoco, Inc. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan I; 
 (2) Sunoco, Inc. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan II; 
 (3) The entire funding for all the
Indemnification Agreements with the directors set forth below shall be Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000.00) in the aggregate upon a Potential Change in Control, and an amount upon a Change in Control calculated on the basis of the Indemnification
Agreements with the following directors: 
 (a) Robert J. Darnall 
 (b) Ursula O. Fairbairn 
 (c) Thomas P.
Gerrity 
 (d) Rosemarie B. Greco 
 (e) James G. Kaiser 
 (f) Richard H. Lenny 
 (g) R. Anderson Pew 
 (h) G. Jackson Ratcliffe 
 (i) John W. Rowe 
 (j) John K. Wulff

 (4) Benefits payable to former directors of the Company (or their beneficiaries) in pay status as of the date of termination of the
Sunoco, Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Retirement Plan.