alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification**I, Robert P. Moyer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Precision Aerospace Components, Inc.(the “company”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. As the company’s sole certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the company’s most recent fiscal quarter (thecompany’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. As the company’s sole certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.       /s/ Robert P. Moyer         Robert P. Moyer
#### TAYLOR v. STATE.

No. 23381.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 5, 1946.

Percy Foreman, of Houston, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment, eight months in jail.

The record is before us without a statement of facts ,or bills of exceptions. Nothing is presented for the consideration of this Court.

*954The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000936094
<NAME>                        LINC Capital, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             Mar-31-2000


<CASH>                                         4,029
<SECURITIES>                                   2,173
<RECEIVABLES>                                 11,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                  11,011
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                        31,845
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               518,862
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0
<BONDS>                                      468,718
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          5,700
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      29,440
<OTHER-SE>                                   (9,810)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 518,862
<SALES>                                        9,088
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              23,709
<CGS>                                          7,403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,197
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1,427)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1,427)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,427)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.29)



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3250 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3250

 Making continuing appropriations for all departments and agencies of 
            the Federal Government, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 2013

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 Making continuing appropriations for all departments and agencies of 
            the Federal Government, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fiscal Sanity Act for 
Appropriations''.

SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is hereby appropriated for 120 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act--
            (1) for each project or activity for which budget authority 
        was provided in the Consolidated and Further Continuing 
        Appropriations Act, 2013 (Public Law 113-6), an amount equal to 
        the budget authority provided in such Act, as reduced pursuant 
        to the Presidential sequestration order dated March 1, 2013, to 
        remain available for a comparable period of availability; and
            (2) for entitlements and other mandatory payments whose 
        budget authority was provided in appropriations Acts for fiscal 
        year 2013, and for activities under the Food and Nutrition Act 
        of 2008, such amounts as may be necessary to maintain program 
        levels as they existed on September 30, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
#### HADNOTT v. STATE.

No. 22681.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 22, 1943.

Marvin P. McCoy and J. T. Kelley, both of Houston, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of theft from the person, and by the jury assessed a penalty of seven years’ confinement in the State penitentiary.

No statement of facts or bills of exceptions appear in the record, in the absence of which no question has been presented for review. The indictment and all matters of procedure appear regular. ■

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         7
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000,000

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      Jun-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   11,269
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         0
<EQUITIES>                                 23
<MORTGAGE>                                  0
<REAL-ESTATE>                               0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                         12,861
<CASH>                                    951
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                    479
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         17,875
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         0
<POLICY-OTHER>                         12,355
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                       0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                           526
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                16
<COMMON>                                    1
<OTHER-SE>                              1,275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           17,875
<PREMIUMS>                                  0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                       403
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                          0
<OTHER-INCOME>                            222
<BENEFITS>                                  0
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                42
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                      179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            80
<INCOME-TAX>                               29
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                               51
<EPS-BASIC>                            1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                            1.06
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                           0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                          0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                     0


</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 97-20336

Summary Calendar

_______________________

OTIS DANIEL EMERSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

EWER, OFFICER,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-95-CV-5310

_________________________________________________________________

July 21, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Otis Daniel Emerson (TDCJ # 588524) appeals the district

court’s dismissal, as frivolous, of his civil rights complaint

against TDCJ Officer Lawrence Ewer. In both his complaint and his

testimony at the Spears v. McCotter, 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985)

hearing, Emerson alleged that Ewer doused him with an unknown

substance and that such dousing caused a severe skin ailment.
2

In determining that Ewer’s actions were not the cause of

Emerson’s skin condition, the district court impermissibly used

Emerson’s medical records and testimony of Dr. Lipscomb to counter

his testimony at the Spears hearing; that is, she accepted as fact

Dr. Lipscomb’s medical opinion that even if Ewer was doused with a

mixture of urine and the cleaning solution Bippy, as he claims,

this mixture could not have caused his atopic dermatitis. See

Williams v. Luna, 909 F.2d 121, 124 (5th Cir. 1990).

Unfortunately, while Dr. Lipscomb’s opinion may later go

uncontested on summary judgment -- because Ewer will be unable to

generate medical proof to contest it -- the district court’s

acceptance of his opinion was premature. The issue is a fact issue

that should not have been resolved in a summary Spears hearing.

The court thus abused its discretion by dismissing the complaint as

frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The court’s

dismissal is VACATED and the case REMANDED for further proceedings.

Emerson’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. See

Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982).

VACATED and REMANDED.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2000 / Presidential Documents 5731

Directive of January 31, 2000

Resolution Regarding Use of Range Facilities on Vieques,

Puerto Rico (Community Assistance)

Directive to the Secretary of Defense [and] Director, Office of Management and Budget

By separate directive I have addressed the resumption of Navy and Marine

Corps training on the island of Vieques.

1. Provided that training opportunity has resumed and is continuously available on Vieques, then within 90 days of this directive, I direct the Office

of Management and Budget (OMB) to request authority and funding (which

with funding for projects described in paragraph 5(e) of the previously

referenced directive will total $40 million) from the Congress for the following projects:

(a) To support the construction of a new commercial ferry pier and terminal

by the Army Corps of Engineers.

(b) To establish an artificial reef construction and fish aggregation program

to create substantial new commercial fishing areas for Vieques fisherman.

Until such time as these new fishing grounds are operational, this legislation

will authorize direct payments of an amount (to be determined by the

National Marine Fisheries Services) to be paid to registered Vieques commercial fishermen for each day they are unable to use existing waters because

the Navy is training.

(c) To support expanding or improving the major cross-island roadways

and bridges on Vieques.

(d) To establish an apprenticeship/training program for young people on

Vieques to facilitate participation in small-scale civic construction projects.

(e) To establish a program with the Government of Puerto Rico to preserve

the Puerto Mosquito Vieques bioluminescent bay and to commit Federal

resources to its preservation.

(f) To establish a professional economic development office for Vieques

for the purpose of promoting Vieques and attracting jobs to the island.

2. The Director of OMB shall publish this directive in the 

œ–

Federal Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, January 31, 2000.

[FR Doc. 00–2751

Filed 2–3–00; 11:22 am]

Billing code 3110–01–M
# Contents

Data 1

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngc3d.htm

U.S. Energy Information Administration

infoctr@eia.doe.gov

# Data 1

Back to Contents
GERALD R. FORD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 

SI()-I()()329-()I9 

Kent County Department of Aeronautics 

AERONAUTICS BOARD 

JOHN VAN LAAR, Chairmon 

THEODORE J. VONK. Vice Chairmon 

DEAN A. AGEE 

JOSEPH TOMASELU 

RICHARD A. VANDER MOLEN 

FLOYD WILSON. JR. 

AERONAUTICS STAFF 

JAMES A. KOSLOSKY, A.A.E, 

PHILUP E. JOHNSON. A.A.E. 

ROBERT W. BENSTEIN, A.A.E. 

BRIAN PICARDAT, A.A.E. 

THOMAS R, ECKLUND. P.E. 

ExecuMve Director 

Deputy Executive Director 

Public Sofety & Ops Director 

Finance & Admin. Director 

Fcxjillties Director 

March 11,2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-fiill 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity to express my support for the application for antitrust 

immiini^ aiid^ agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan 

Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for oneworld to 

compete effectively with the Star and SkyTeam alliance. This increased interalliance 

competition will in turn enhance the benefits of the Department's Open Skies policy -

first by solidifying U.S.-Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a foundation for further 

liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, I encourage die Department of Transportation to approve tiiis 

application as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together to 

deliver highly competitive air transportation services. Approval for AA/JAL alliance will 

have a positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and 

pricing options and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefit from having 

three competitive air alliances to choose from. 

I urge you to quickly approve this application. 

Sincerely; 

James A. Koslpsky, A.A.E. 

Executive Director . 

' .!;;;," ' • .»i ' •; ;i."' . '!• . ' • '-•'•• 

5500 ^J^iSWBill^.i!-[y^^A^^^ M I 49512-4055 • PH. 616-233-6000 • FAX 616-233-6025 

-'/", 5 ,,. w\A/w.flygrandrapids.org
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.53

                           CRITICAL THERAPEUTICS, INC.

                      2006 SALARIES FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

      On November 30, 2005, based on the recommendation of the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors, our independent directors of the Board
approved market-adjustment and merit increases in the annual base salary of our
executive officers effective January 1, 2006. The 2006 annual base salary for
each of our executive officers will be as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Executive Officer                 Title                                                    2006 Annual Base Salary
-----------------                 -----                                                    -----------------------
<S>                               <C>                                                      <C>
Paul D. Rubin, M.D.               President and Chief Executive Officer                    $               367,000

Frederick Finnegan                Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing             $               252,600

Walter Newman, Ph.D.              Chief Scientific Officer and Senior Vice President of    $               269,500
                                  Research and Development

Trevor Phillips, Ph.D.            Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President of     $               269,000
                                  Operations

Frank E. Thomas                   Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of        $               252,600
                                  Finance and Treasurer

Scott B. Townsend, Esq.           Vice President of Legal Affairs and Secretary            $               220,000
</TABLE>
# o

U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n Offic e o fth e Secretar y o fTransportatio n GENERA L COUNSE L 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , DC 2059 0

MEMORANDU M T O DOCKE TOST-2006-2398 5 FROM : ROBER

TC . ASHBY Jun e 17 , 201 0 ...- , :;_; >

O n Jun e 17 , 2010 , representative s o fsevera l disabilit yorganization s me t wit h DO Tan d FR Aofficial s an d staf fconcernin g railroa d accessibilit yissues . Th e attendee s fo rFR Awer e Kare n Rae , Deput y Administrator , an d Calvi n Gibson , Directo ro fCivi l Rights . I attende d fo rth e Offic e o fGenera l Counsel . Attendee s fo rdisabilit yorganization s include d Curt Decker , Mauree n McCloskey , Denni s Cannon , Ke n Shiotoni , Jennife rDexter , Juli e Ward , Maryli n Golden , an d Ji m Weisma n (th e latte rtw o calle d in) . Th e disabilit ygrou p representative s mad e certai n suggestion s concernin g th e pendin g rulemakin g concernin g rai l accessibility . On e wa s tha t al l ne wpassenge rcars purchase d b yrailroad s shoul d b e equippe d wit h car-born e lifts . Asecon d wa s tha t railroad s shoul d b e require d t o provid e leve l boardin g a t ne wo raltere d stations , as propose d i n th e NPRM . I ffreigh t railroad s objected , th e passenge r railroa d shoul d b e require d t o explai n th e freigh t railroad' s objection s i n detai l befor e bein g grante d permission , o n th e basi s o finfeasibility , t o us e a les s desirabl e solution . Th e disabilit ygrou p representative s als o discusse d severa l topic s concernin g FR Aenforcemen t o f Amtra k complianc e wit h accessibilit yrequirements .
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      In connection with the quarterly report of Tecumseh Products Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
James S. Nicholson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
            or 78o(d)); and

      (2)   the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: August 14, 2006                         BY:   /s/ JAMES S. NICHOLSON
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   James S. Nicholson
                                                   Vice President, Treasurer and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-31283

Summary Calendar

 

SCOTT FALLO; KASEY FALLO,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

PICCADILLY CAFETERIAS, INC.; ET AL.,

Defendants,

PICCADILLY CAFETERIAS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(94-CV-907-M)

--------------------

May 1, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiffs-Appellants Scott and Kasey Fallo appeal the

district court’s order denying their motion for attorney’s fees and

costs incurred in the instant Employment Retirement Income Security

Act (ERISA) suit. The Fallos argue that the district court abused

its discretion in denying the motion.
2

The district court, by adopting the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation, determined that an award was unwarranted

because, although Piccadilly had the ability to satisfy such an

award, there was no indication that Piccadilly had acted in bad

faith, that an award in the instant case would have a deterrent

effect, and that the instant suit would benefit all participants of

an ERISA plan or would resolve a significant ERISA question. The

district court also reasoned that Piccadilly’s legal position was

not so disproportionately meritless as to justify an award. After

reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we cannot say

that these findings are clearly erroneous or that they represent an

abuse of discretion. See Ramsey v. Colonial Life Ins. Co. of

America, 12 F.3d 472, 480 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the

district court’s order denying the Fallos’ motion for attorney’s

fees and costs is AFFIRMED. See id.; Harms v. Cavenham Forest

Industries, Inc., 984 F.2d 686, 694 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.