alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #3302]
 As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on October 4, 2000, I find that Broward, Collier, Miami-Dade, and Monroe Counties in the State of Florida constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and flooding beginning on October 3, 2000, and continuing. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on December 3, 2000 and for economic injury until the close of business on July 5, 2001 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308. In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in the contiguous counties of Hendry, Lee, and Palm Beach in the State of Florida may be filed until the specified date at the above location. The interest rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
7.375Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.687Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.750For Economic Injury:Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The numbers assigned to this disaster are 330206 for physical damage and 9J3200 for economic injury. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) Dated: October 6, 2000. Allan I. Hoberman, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 00-27635 Filed 10-26-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 318 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 318

 To authorize a Wall of Remembrance as part of the Korean War Veterans 
 Memorial and to allow certain private contributions to fund that Wall 
                            of Remembrance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2013

   Mr. Hall (for himself, Mr. Connolly, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Hanna, Ms. 
Schwartz, Mr. Young of Florida, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Grimm, Mr. Keating, Mr. 
 McGovern, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Coble, Mr. Stivers, Mr. Cole, 
 Mr. Dingell, Mr. Hultgren, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Guthrie, Mr. Conyers, and 
 Mr. Butterfield) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize a Wall of Remembrance as part of the Korean War Veterans 
 Memorial and to allow certain private contributions to fund that Wall 
                            of Remembrance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WALL OF REMEMBRANCE.

    Section 1 of the Act titled ``An Act to authorize the erection of a 
memorial on Federal Land in the District of Columbia and its environs 
to honor members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served in 
the Korean War'', approved October 25, 1986 (Public Law 99-572), is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Such memorial shall include a Wall of Remembrance, which shall be 
constructed without the use of Federal funds. The American Battle 
Monuments Commission shall request and consider design recommendations 
from the Korean War Veterans Memorial Foundation, Inc. for the 
establishment of the Wall of Remembrance. The Wall of Remembrance shall 
include--
            ``(1) a list by name of members of the Armed Forces of the 
        United States who were killed in action in the Korean War;
            ``(2) the number of members of the Armed Forces of the 
        United States who, in regards to the Korean War--
                    ``(A) were wounded in action;
                    ``(B) are listed as missing in action; or
                    ``(C) were prisoners of war; and
            ``(3) the number of members of the Korean Augmentation to 
        the United States Army, the Republic of Korea Armed Forces, and 
        the other nations of the United Nations Command who, in regards 
        to the Korean War--
                    ``(A) were killed in action;
                    ``(B) were wounded in action;
                    ``(C) are listed as missing in action; or
                    ``(D) were prisoners of war.''.
                                 <all>
```
Schedule of documents substantially similar to Exhibit 10.46



 EXHIBIT 10.47 
  
 Schedule of documents substantially similar to Exhibit 10.46 
  

	1.	Master Lease between Jameson Inns Financing 02, LP and Kitchin Hospitality, LLC dated August 24, 2005. 

  

	2.	Master Lease between Jameson Inns Financing 02, LP and Kitchin Hospitality, LLC dated January 24, 2006.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27428]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated June 7, 2000, and published in the Federal Register 
on June 22, 2000, (65 FR 38861), Wildlife Laboratories, Inc., 1401 Duff 
Drive, Suite 600, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, made application to the 
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of carfentanil (9743), a basic class of controlled 
substance listed in Schedule II.
    The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substance for 
distribution to its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in title 21, United States Code, section 823(a) and 
determined that the registration of Wildlife Laboratories to 
manufacture carfentanil is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. DEA has investigated Wildlife Laboratories to ensure that the 
company's registration is consistent with the public interest. This 
investigation included inspection and testing of the company's physical 
security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state 
and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. 
Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and 1.104, the 
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby 
orders that the application submitted by the above firm for 
registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled 
substance listed above is granted.

    Dated: October 17, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-27428 Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of  Chapter 63 of Title 18 of The United States Code

I, Steven J. Martin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The
ServiceMaster Company.

/s/ STEVEN J. MARTIN Steven J. Martin
March 28, 2011


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 Of The United States Code

I, J. Patrick Spainhour, the Chief Executive Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
(ii) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The
ServiceMaster Company.

/s/ PATRICK SPAINHOUR J. Patrick Spainhour
March 30, 2009


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
10QSB REPORT FOR THE QUARTER AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 10QSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000095898
<NAME> SWISS CHALET , INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,775,434
<SECURITIES>                                   606,400
<RECEIVABLES>                                  403,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,726
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,381,422
<PP&E>                                       6,100,148
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,202,897
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,827,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          540,662
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       700,581
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,542,559
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,827,002
<SALES>                                      2,491,703
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,491,703
<CGS>                                           43,653
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,752,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                695,294
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            695,294
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   695,294
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0210. BLANCH DAVIS, et al. v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION.

This case originated as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. 

Following an adverse ruling against “Blanch Davis or Occupant,” Blanch Davis

purported to appeal the magistrate court’s decision to the superior court.

1 On

December 10, 2014, the superior court dismissed the appeal. Davis filed this

application on December 23, 2014. We lack jurisdiction.

An application for discretionary appeal generally may be filed within 30 days

of entry of the order sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). However, the

underlying subject matter of an appeal controls over the relief sought in determining

the proper appellate procedure. See Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467-468 (448 SE2d

192) (1994). The underlying subject matter here is a dispossessory judgment. 

Pursuant to OCGA § 44-7-56, appeals from a dispossessory judgment must be filed

within seven days of the date the judgment was entered. See Ray M. Wright, Inc. v.

Jones, 239 Ga. App. 521 (521 SE2d 456) (1999). Because Davis filed her notice of

appeal 13 days after the superior court’s order was entered, it is untimely. 

Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review this application, which is hereby

DISMISSED.

1 Blanch Davis, a tenant at sufferance following foreclosure, is apparently

deceased. Rather than filing a suggestion of death or a substitution of parties as the

law requires, Davis’s attorney continued litigation in her name. See OCGA § 9-11-25

(a). Arguably, Davis’s death renders the matter moot. But it appears that Davis’s

daughter, Monica Davis, continues to occupy the property. Thus, we have not

dismissed the application as moot. See OCGA § 5-6-48 (b) (3).

January 16, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

01/16/2015
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




RESIGNATION




Board of Directors

TEKNIK DIGITAL ARTS, INC.

7518 Elbow Bend Road, Suite B-9

Carefree, Arizona 85377




Dear Board Members:



If, and to the extent that I was duly appointed as the President and/or as any other officer of
TEKNIK DIGITAL ARTS, INC. (the
“Company”), I hereby resign as the President and/or from any other
office of the Company to which I may have been appointed effective as of this date.




Dated: February 27, 2006




Corey Comstock

Signature: /s/ Corey Comstock
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 4340

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TERRELL JAMAR HOUSTON , Defendant

- Appellant

.

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. (S. Ct. No. 17

- 6520)

Decided on Remand: July 26, 2018

Before TRAXLER, AGEE * and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.
Ross Richardson, Executive Director, Ann L. Hester, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Jill Westmoreland Rose, United States Attorney, Anthony J. Enright, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carol ina,

* Judge Davis participated in the original decision but ret ired prior to the Supreme Court’ s remand of the case and was replaced by Judge Agee.2 for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Terrell Jamar Houston entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon , see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), reserving the right to a ppeal the district
court’s denial of his motion to suppress. The district court sentenced Houston to 37 months’ imprisonment. On appeal to this court, we held that the district court properly denied the motion to suppress based on our decision in United States v. Wellons , 32 F.3d 117 (4th Cir. 1994). In Wellons , we held that a driver of a rental car who is not listed on the rental contract as an authorized driver has no expectation of privacy in the car or
containers in the car and that the driver’s Four th Amendment rights therefore were not violated by a warrantless search of the rental car and its contents. See id. at 11 9

- 20

. In Byrd v. United States , 138 S. Ct. 1518 (2018), however, the Supreme Court held
that “ the mere fact that a driver in lawful p ossession or control of a rental car is not listed on the rental agreement will not defeat his or her otherwise reasonable expectation of privacy. ” Id. at 1531. Because t he Supreme Court’s decision in Byrd abrogated our decision in Wellons , the Court vacated our decision in this case and remanded for reconsideration in light of Byrd

. Having considered the Supreme Court’s decision, we hereby vacate the decision of the district court and remand for further proceedings . The
district court sh ould consider the matter de novo in light of Byrd , and the parties are free to raise any newly relevant issues

. VACATED AND REMANDED
Taylor Devices,Inc.

NOMINATING COMMITTEECHARTER

        The Nominating Committee ofTaylor Devices, Inc. shall be a standing committee of the Board of Directors;and shall be comprised of not fewer than three members of the Board, all of whomshall be "independent" within the meaning of applicable NASD listingstandards.  Such standards are set forth on Attachment A, "DirectorIndependence Standards," and may be revised from time to time. 

        In its consideration andselection of nominees proposed for election to the Board of Directors, theNominating Committee shall at all times be governed by the "Director NominatingProcess and Policy," attached as Attachment B; and shall take into account thequalifications set forth on Attachment C, "Director QualificationCriteria."

        The Nominating Committee shallconsider recommendations for director nominees made by shareholders (includingself-nominees) on the same basis as other candidates, so long as the individualsproposed by shareholders meet Taylor's Director Qualification Criteria, and eachsubmission is accompanied by the information required in paragraph 4 ofAttachment B. 

        Shareholder recommendationsfor director nominees may be made in writing c/o the Corporate Secretary'sOffice, at the address shown on Attachment D, "Shareholder Communications withthe Board," or electronically at Taylor's internet web site.

Attachment A - *Director IndependenceStandards*
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

VANQUISH ADVISORS LLC and DONALD UDERITZ
, Appellant s ,

v.

KBC FINANCIAL PRODUCTS (CAYMAN ISLANDS) LTD, VCG SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES, FUND LP, and VCG SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND, LTD.
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 18

- 2 318

[ May 23, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; G erard Joseph Curley, Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 502012CA006891

- XXXX

- MB and 502012CA011252XXXXMBAI.

Gary A. Woodfield of Hail e, Shaw & Pfaffenberger, P.A., North Palm Beach, for appellant s

.

Thomas K. Cauley, Jr. and Joseph R. Dosch of Si d ley Austin LLP, Chicago, Illinois, and Joshua B. Feinberg of Malvin Feinberg, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee KBC Financial Products (Caym an Islands) LTD.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, L EVINE and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Ex parte W. E. STEWART.

No. 27337.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 20, 1954.

No attorney on appeal.

Wesley Dice, ‘State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

This is an original application for a writ "of habeas corpus'to this Court, Relator being confined in the penitentiary under sentence of 2 to 7 yea'rs from Wichita ■ Coun•ty.

The judgment of the trial court, a jury .being, waived, adjpdged Relator guilty of the offense of “swindling with a worthless check.as charged in the indictment,” and that he be confined in the penitentiary for s.even years. ;

The indictment shows that the Relator was charged with the offense of obtaining personal property, with the intent to defraud by drawing a check in the amount of $50 or more without sufficient funds as defined in art. 567b, Vernon’s Ann. P.C. The indictment may be considered in construing the judgment and sentence. Such shows that Relator was here convicted of the offense defined by art. 567b, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. Ex Parte King, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 231, 240 S.W.2d 777; Jones v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 241, 226 S.W.2d 437.

Relator contends that the judgment is void because a fine was not assessed as part of the punishment in addition to the penitentiary term, both being required by statute. Art. 567b, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., provides that, for a violation of this Act where the check or draft is in the amount of $50, or more, the punishment shall be by confinement in the penitentiary for not less than 2 years nor more than 10 years, and by a fine not exceeding $10,000.

The punishment here imposed was of the same character, as far as it went, as that prescribed by the statute and the judgment cannot be collaterally attacked on the ground that no fine was imposed. Lenore v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 417, 129 S.W.2d 657. This appears to be the rule in most jurisdictions. Ex Parte Clarke, 30 Okl.Cr. 259, 236 P. 66; Linningen v. Morgan, 8 Cir., 241 Fed. 645; Dillon v. State, 38 Ohio St. 586; and Annotation (Illegal or Erroneous Sentence as Grounds for Habeas *946Corpus. IV. Deficient Sentence), 76 A.L.R. 468 at page 505.

We have held however that on appeal a judgment assessing a punishment less than the minimum provided by law will be reversed. See Simmons v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 601, 245 S.W.2d 254.

We overrule Relator’s contention that the trial court, after waiver of trial by jury, is without power to assess the punishment upon a plea of guilty to an offense less than capital. Ex Parte Traxler, 147 Tex.Cr.R. 661, 184 S.W.2d 286.

The relief prayed for is denied.

Opinion approved by the Court.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 12

                         ADVANTA CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                    MARCH 31,
                                                             --------------------
($ IN THOUSANDS)                                                2005       2004
----------------                                             ----------  --------
<S>                                                          <C>         <C>
Net income                                                   $72,670     $ 9,439
Income tax expense                                            12,347       6,163
                                                             -------     -------
Earnings before income taxes                                  85,017(1)   15,602
Fixed charges:
  Interest on debt and deposits                               10,296       9,242
  Interest on subordinated debt payable to preferred
    securities trust                                           2,289       2,289
  One-third of all rentals                                       386         634
                                                             -------     -------
  Total fixed charges                                         12,971      12,165
                                                             -------     -------
Earnings before income taxes and fixed charges               $97,988     $27,767
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(2)                           7.55x       2.28x
</TABLE>

(1)   Earnings before income taxes in the three months ended March 31, 2005
      includes a $67.7 million gain on transfer of consumer credit card business
      relating to our May 28, 2004 agreement with Bank of America.

(2)   For purposes of computing these ratios, "earnings" represent income before
      income taxes plus fixed charges. "Fixed charges" consist of interest
      expense and one-third (the portion deemed representative of the interest
      factor) of rental expense on operating leases.