alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 12 , 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 01160

- CR

HARRY ANTHONY MICKLE S , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1353291

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a guilty plea to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon

. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on December 5, 2012 , to confinement for two years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant
filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.2

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2( a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports
the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, we dismiss the ap peal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Boyce and Donovan

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00141-CV

Specialty Compounding, LLC

v.

Elizabeth Bourne

On Appeal from the

404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2014-DCL-5422-G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

26th day of May, 2016
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6495

ALLAN L. GANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JANET RENO, U. S. Attorney General; CATHERINE HAWKS, Regional Director, Bureau of Prisons;WILLIAM J. THOMPSON, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute-Morgantown; VICTOR SIHA,M.D., Medical Director; BLANCO, Physicians Assistant; TAYLOR, Physicians Assistant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-29-1) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allan L. Gant, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Michael Flatley, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gant v. Reno , No. CA-97-29-1 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### FORD v. STATE.

No. 26120.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 17, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Upon her plea of guilty before the court, appellant was convicted of the offense of unlawfully selling beer, with punishment assessed at a fine of $150.

No statement of facts or bills of exception accompany the record. Nothing is presented for our consideration.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of Integrated Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period from April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and for the period indicated. This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.








Dated: June 23, 2011




/s/ Kenneth K. Westbrook


Kenneth K. Westbrook


Chief Executive Officer
‘THE ,iTJ?ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
Aun~riw ILTRXAR WILL WILSON Ax-rORNmzY G~Nl.xaAI. November 12, 1957

, HonorableRobert S. Calvert

Comptrollerof PublicAacounts Capitol Station Austin, Texas Dear Mr. Calvert: Opinion No, ww-320 Re: The status of the State Dairy and Hog Farm and other related questions.

You have requestedan opinion of this office concerning the status of the State Dairy and Hog Farm.

The followingquestionswere submittedto our office to be answered: "(1) Ts the Dairy and Hog Farm a separate institution? "(2) If not, to what institution should it be attached as of this date?" The 51st Legislature,Regular Session,made and constituted the State Dairy and Hog Farm one of the institutions which became a unit of the "Texas StateHospitals and Special Schools". (SeeArticle 3174a, Section 1, and Article 3174b, Section 3, 'urernonrs Civil Statutes). House Bill 133, Acts 55th Legislature, 1957, Chapter 385, page 905, appropriated $20,000.00 for the establishment of a Hog Farm Revolving Fund to be used in the operation of a Hog Farm at Leander,Texas,which farm was to be operated on a reimbursablebasis to serve institutionsunder such rules and regulationsas may be establishedby the Hospital Board, and which fund, togetherwith all receipts deposited to its credit, couldbe used to pay salaries,purchase suppliesand equipment, and pay such other expenses as may be necessary for the efficient operation of the Hog Farm. This appropriationwas to the "Hospitalsand Special Schools CentralOffice".

Therefore, it is the opinion of this office that the State Dairy and Hog Farm is a part of the Texas State Hospitals and Special Schoolsand any sum ofmoney appropriated to the State Dairy and Hog Farm has been appropriated to the Central office of the Board for Texas State Hospitalsand SpecialHonorableRobert S. Calvert,page 2. (m-320)

Schoolsand is to be expendedby that branch for thepurposes indicated in the appropriationbill,

SUMMARY

It is the opinion of this office that the State Dairy and Hog Farm is a part of the Texas State Hospitals and Special Schoolsand any appropriation to the Central Office of the Board for Texas State Hospitalsand Special Schools for the State Dairy and Hog Farm is to be expended by that branch for the purposes indicated in the appropriationbill.

Very truly yours, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas

LS:wam:zt APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Geo. P. Blackburu, Chairman FredWerkenthin W. V. Geppert J. Milton Richardson C. K. Richards Wayland C. Rivers, Jr. E. M. DeGeurin Mrs. Marietta Payne REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: James N. Ludlum Assistant
Exhibit 10.26

                 [LETTERHEAD OF STORYFIRST COMMUNICATIONS, INC.]

                                 January 1, 2003

Petr O. Aven
Alfa Bank
9, ul. Mashi Poryvaevoi
Moscow
Russian Federation

      Re:   Fee for Successful License Tenders

Dear Petr:

      I am writing to confirm our understanding with respect to the payment of
fees to Alfa Bank for successful license tenders. In the event that StoryFirst
and Alfa, working together, are successful in winning, in an open frequency
tender, a VHF license to broadcast terrestrial television in a city listed on
Exhibit A hereto for a company or other legal entity in which StoryFirst and/or
one of its subsidiaries owns at least a 51% interest, StoryFirst shall pay to
Alfa, or its designated affiliate, the sum set forth opposite such city's name
on Exhibit A.

      If StoryFirst or one if its subsidiaries acquires a company or business
with an existing broadcast license (in a city listed on Exhibit A or otherwise),
no success fee will be payable to Alfa unless such a success fee has been agreed
in writing before such acquisition.

      Moreover, StoryFirst reserves the right to remove any city from Exhibit A
at any time by written notice to Alfa so long as no application has been made to
secure a license in such city by or on behalf of StoryFirst as of the date of
such notice. In such event, StoryFirst shall no longer be liable to Alfa to pay
any fee in connection with any license subsequently awarded to StoryFirst (or a
StoryFirst affiliate) in such city.

      In no event will StoryFirst be liable to pay any success fees to Alfa upon
the successful tender for a license to be used in StoryFirst repeater project.

      Please countersign this letter below to confirm Alfa's agreement with the
terms of this letter.

                                         Sincerely,

                                         STORYFIRST COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


                                         Tate Fite
                                         Chief Financial Officer

Agreed to:

ALFA BANK




                                    EXHIBIT A
                             TO LETTER TO ALFA BANK
                              DATED JANUARY 1, 2003

City                           Success Fee
----------                     -----------

Yaroslavl                      $ 300,000

Ekaterinburg                   $ 300,000

Saratov                        $ 300,000

Chelyabinsk                    $ 300,000

Novosibirsk                    $ 300,000

Krasnoyarsk                    $ 300,000

Rostov-on-Don                  $ 300,000

Petrozavodsk                   $ 100,000

Tver                           $ 200,000

Ufa                            $ 300,000

Tumen                      pound 300,000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR FISCAL QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,148,682
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,706,617
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (145,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,683,272
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,621,408
<PP&E>                                       9,097,211
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,844,691)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,757,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,904,077
<BONDS>                                      1,779,916
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        113
<COMMON>                                         4,056
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,069,594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,757,756
<SALES>                                     14,678,932
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,678,932
<CGS>                                        7,366,976
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,360,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (99,125)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                35,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             607,748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            408,036
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   408,036
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
Evolving Systems, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 Nos. 333-112082 and 333-1224761 and on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-103655, 333-89438, 333,61446, 333-82473, 333-60779, 333-116085 and 333-58285) of Evolving
Systems, Inc. of our report dated March 22, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Evolving Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the December 31,
2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Evolving Systems, Inc.



Denver,
Colorado
March 22, 2006

---



QuickLinks
#### Ex parte BARNES.

No. 23849.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 15, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Relator secured a writ of habeas corpus to be released from an extradition order removing him to the State of Wisconsin. Upon a hearing he was remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Dallas County to be delivered to the agent of the demanding state for removal thereto. From this order he gave notice of appeal to this court. The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is shown challenging the validity of the trial judge’s order, and all presumptions are in favor of its regularity.

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27201]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Defense Intelligence Agency, Science and Technology Advisory 
Board Closed Panel Meeting

AGENCY: Defense Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of Subsection (d) of Section 10 of 
Public Law 92-463, As amended by Section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice 
is hereby given that a closed meeting Of the DIA Science and Technology 
Advisory board has been scheduled as follows:

DATES: November 2000 (0800 to 1600).

ADDRESSES: The Defense Intelligence Agency, 3100 Clarendon Blvd, 
Arlington, VA 22201-5300.

DATES: November 2, 2000 (0800 to 1600).

ADDRESSES: The Defense Intelligence Agency, 200 MacDill Blvd, 
Washington, DC 20340.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Victoria J. Prescott, Director/
Executive Secretary, DIA Science and Technology Advisory board, 
Washington, DC 20340-1328 (202) 231-4930.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The entire meeting is devoted to the 
discussion of classified information as defined in Section 552b(c)(1), 
Title 5 of the U.S. Code, and therefore will be closed to the public. 
The Board will receive briefings on and discuss several current 
critical intelligence issues and advise the Director, DIA, on related 
scientific and technical matters.

    Dated: October 18, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-27201 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5601-10-M
```
Summary of Executive Perquisites Policy



  
 Exhibit 10.36

  
 SUMMARY OF RAYTHEON COMPANY EXECUTIVE 
 PERQUISITES POLICY 
  
 The Company has an Executive Perquisites Policy, approved by the Management Development and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, that
provides executive officers and other key employees with certain benefits. 
  
 Each executive officer of the Company is entitled to receive the following perquisites and benefits: financial planning services of up to $15,000 per year; life insurance coverage of up to five times base salary;
excess liability insurance of up to $5 million; participation in the Executive Health Program (benefits of up to $2,000 per year); participation in the Executive Registry (access to medical services while on business travel); car allowance of up to
$18,000 per year or use of a leased automobile with a value of up to $18,000 per year; and first class commercial air travel for business purposes. The Chief Executive Officer is entitled to excess liability insurance coverage of up to $15 million
and a larger car allowance. More information regarding these perquisites may be found in the Company’s 2005 Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 24, 2005. 
  
  
  
 February 24, 2006
**Exhibit23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board ofDirectors J. Crew Group, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statement No. 333-60658 on Form S-8 of J. CrewGroup, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan of our report dated March 25, 2004 (exceptas to Note 2 which is as of September 9, 2004) included in Form 10-K/A, withrespect to the consolidated balance sheets of J. Crew Group, Inc. andsubsidiaries as of January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003 and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and changes in stockholders’deficit for each of the years in the three-year period ended January 31, 2004,and the financial statement schedule.

 

Our report reflects adoption of Statement of Financial AccountingStandard No. 150,  “Accounting forCertain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities andEquity” in the third quarter of fiscal 2003.

 

Our reportindicates that J. Crew Group Inc. has restated its financial statements as ofand for the period ended January 31, 2004, to reflect the write-off ofcertain prepaid sample costs that should have been expensed as incurred.

 

 

KPMG LLP

 

 

 NewYork, New York

October 22,2004

 

----
EXHIBIT 12

                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV
                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.
                      COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
          COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    For the Period June 19, 1998 to December 25, 1998
                                    -------------------------------------------------
                                    Merrill Lynch Preferred   Merrill Lynch Preferred
                                       Capital Trust IV           Funding IV, L.P.
                                    -----------------------   -----------------------

<S>                                        <C>                       <C>        
Earnings                                   $15,577,765               $18,273,863
                                           ===========               ===========
                                                                   
Fixed charges                              $        --               $        --
                                                                   
Preferred securities distribution                                  
  requirements                              15,110,400                15,577,765
                                           -----------               -----------
                                                                   
Total combined fixed charges and                                   
  preferred securities distributions       $15,110,400               $15,577,765
                                           ===========               ===========
                                                                   
Ratio of earnings to combined                                      
  fixed charges and preferred                                      
  securities distributions                        1.03                      1.17
</TABLE>
##### 

5fulfillment of

EXHIBIT 99.2

The following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Financial
Officer of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. on the basis of such officers knowledge
and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2003 (the Report), I,
Daniel R. Kadolph, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and                   
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

| |        |                          
| | ------ | -------------------------
| |        | /s/ Daniel R. Kadolph    
| |        |                          
| |        | Name: Daniel R. Kadolph  
| | Title: | Senior Vice President and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer  
| |        | Date: April 16, 2003
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3060 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 232 Southwest Johnson Avenue in Burleson, 

Texas, as the ‘‘Sergeant William Moody Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3060 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT WILLIAM MOODY POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 232 Southwest Johnson Avenue 

5 in Burleson, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Sergeant William Moody Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant William 

11 Moody Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 24, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS