alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.01

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      I, William Scigliano, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of IQ Biometrix,
Inc;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual
Report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

            c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

      5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.


                                                     /s/ William Scigliano
                                                     -------------------------
                                                         William Scigliano,
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 31, 2004
First Amendment to Amended and Restated 1998 Employee Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10.35 
  
 AMENDMENT 
 TO

 CAREMARK RX, INC. 1998 EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 15, 2000 
  
 The Caremark Rx, Inc. 1998 Employee Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows: 
  
 1. Amendment Regarding Transferability of Options. Section 6.10 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting Section 6.10 in its entirety and
substituting the following new Section 6.10 therefor: 
  
 6.10 TRANSFERABILITY OF OPTIONS. To the extent not prohibited by any statute, rule or regulation applicable to the Plan, the Options or the registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Common Stock to be issued upon
exercise of the Options, the Committee may, in its discretion, authorize all or a portion of Options granted to a Participant to be on terms which permit transfer by such Participant to (i) Immediate Family Members, (ii) a trust or trusts
for the exclusive benefit of such Immediate Family Members, or (iii) a partnership in which such Immediate Family Members are the only partners, provided that (A) the Award Agreement pursuant to which such Options are granted must be
approved by the Committee, and must expressly provide for transferability in a manner consistent with this Section, and (B) subsequent transfers of transferred Options shall be prohibited except those by will or the laws of descent and
distribution. Following transfer, any such Options shall continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to transfer, provided that for purposes of this Plan, the term “Participant” shall be
deemed to refer to the transferee. The events of termination of employment shall continue to be applied with respect to the original Participant, following which the Options shall be exercisable by the transferee only to the extent, and for the
periods specified in this Section 6.10. Notwithstanding the foregoing, should the Committee provide that Options granted be transferable, the Company by such actions incurs no obligation to notify o otherwise provide 
  

 1 








 notice to a transferee of early termination of the Option. In the event of a transfer, as set forth
above, the original Participant is and will remain subject to and responsible for any applicable withholding taxes upon the exercise of such Options. 
  
 2. Effective Date. The effective date of this Amendment shall be November 15, 2000. 
  
 3. Miscellaneous. 
  
 (a) Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Plan. 
  
 (b) Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full
force and effect. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to
the Caremark Rx, Inc. 1998 Employee Stock Option Plan to be executed as of the Effective Date. 
  

	
	 CAREMARK RX, INC.


	 Sara J. Finley, Corporate Secretary



  

 2
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 23(i)

                     Consent of Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Titanium Holdings Group, Inc.
(formerly Enviro-Clean of America, Inc.)

We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-36784 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 14, 2002, related to the
consolidated balance sheet of Titanium Holdings Group, Inc. and Subsidiary as of
December 31, 2001 and the related statements of operations, shareholders'equity,
and cash flows for each of the two years in the period then ended, which appear
in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-KSB on Titanium Holdings
Group, Inc.

/s/ Goldstein Golub Kesslar LLP
-------------------------------
Goldstein Golub Kesslar LLP
New York, New York

March 27, 2002
#### Anna L. TARR, Administratrix of the Estate of James Tarr, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MANCHESTER INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 76-1328.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Argued Oct. 4, 1976.

Decided Nov. 2, 1976.

E. Paul Kelly, Manchester, N. H., with whom Law Office of John F. Cullity, Manchester, N. H., was on brief, for defendant-appellant.

Stanley M. Brown, Manchester, N. H., with whom Stanley M. Brown Professional Association, Manchester, N. H., was on brief, for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Taking appellant’s claim on its strongest basis, the New Hampshire Supreme Court, on certification to it by the United States District Court of two questions involving the New Hampshire Workmen’s Compensation statute, also answered a third question, which answer, if it stands, is largely dispositive of the present action, against appellant. *Tarr, Administratrix v. Republic Corp.*(1976), N.H., 352 A.2d 708. Appellant’s counsel discovered this circumstance after the expiration of the ten day period allowed for filing a petition for rehearing in the state court. Instead of moving the New Hampshire court to accept a petition for rehearing late, appellant chose to proceed in the district court, where it was rebuffed. It now asks us to correct the New Hampshire court’s interpretation of its statute, or, alternatively, to recertify.

Clearly, we cannot do the former. No matter what the result, we cannot “correct” a state court’s interpretation of its own law. *Mullaney v. Wilbur,*1975, 421 U.S. 684, 690-91, 95 S.Ct. 1881, 44 L.Ed.2d 508.

*15 We think it would be equally inappropriate to usurp the state court’s control of its docket. If appellant had sought of that court permission to file a petition for rehearing late, and permission had been denied, it cannot be thought that we should overrule that decision by again presenting it with the question. We see no substantial difference between overruling a state court’s discretion, and adopting a procedure which would have the effect of depriving the court of the opportunity of exercising one. The issue, however, lies deeper than courtesy. The purpose of certification is to ascertain what the state law is, not, when the state court has already said what it is, to afford a party an opportunity to persuade the court to say something else. The rule of *Erie RR. v. Tompkins,*1938, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, calls on us to apply state law, not, if we can be persuaded to doubt its soundness, to participate in an effort to change it.

The cause is remanded with instructions that the District Court allow appellant to recover on its lien against the children’s share of the estate; otherwise affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000096988
<NAME> MARLTON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,289,827
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,112,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                   365,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,017,032
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,260,131
<PP&E>                                       6,739,185
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,865,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,550,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,445,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    30,589,129
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,433,898)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,550,108
<SALES>                                     44,367,765
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            44,367,765
<CGS>                                       33,321,971
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,321,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (466,754)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,261,275
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (902,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,359,275
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,359,275
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 210 (Monday, October 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27773]



[[Page 64695]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER00-1534-001, ER00-1535-001]


Ocean State Power and Ocean State Power II; Notice of Filing

October 24, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 16, 2000, Ocean States Power and Ocean 
State Power II, (Ocean State), tendered for filing its Refund 
Compliance Report in the above referenced dockets.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before November 6, 2000. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Beginning November 1, 2000, comments and protests 
may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web 
site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27773 Filed 10-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

                 STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER FURNISHED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief Financial Officer of
Citizens South Banking Corporation (the "Company").

     This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2005 (the "Report").

     By execution of this statement, I certify that:

          A)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
               or 78o(d)) and

          B)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
               covered by the Report.

March 13, 2006                                         /s/ Gary F. Hoskins
Dated                                                  -------------------------
                                                       Gary F. Hoskins
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

     This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 99.1

                       MULTI-MEDIA TUTORIAL SERVICES, INC.
                             a Delaware corporation

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                            Section 906 Certification

         I, Barry Reichman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Multi-Media Tutorial Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
         quarterly period ended May 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with
         the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                                          MULTI-MEDIA TUTORIAL SERVICES, INC.


Dated: August 19, 2003                    By: /s/ Barry Reichman
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Barry Reichman
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3264 

Eliminating the debt ceiling for a period defined, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 5, 2013 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

Eliminating the debt ceiling for a period defined, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal Sanity Act for 

5 the National Debt’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NONAPPLICABILITY OF DEBT CEILING. 

7 Section 3101(b) of title 31, United States Code, shall 

8 not apply for the period beginning on the date of the en9 actment of this Act and ending 180 days thereafter. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
        4.4

      


       

      February
        28, 2006

      


      Smithfield
        Fiduciary LLC

      c/o
        Highbridge Capital Management, LLC

      9
        West
        57th
        Street

      27th
        Floor

      New
        York,
        New York

      USA
        10019

      Attention:   Ari
        J. Storch / Adam J. Chill

      


      


      Dear
        Sirs:

      
         

        
          	Re:	Generex Biotechnology
                  Corporation
	 	- Amendment to Jan
                  20 06
                  Additional Investment Right


        

         

      

      We
        make
        reference to the additional investment right issued by Generex Biotechnology
        Corporation (the “Company”)
        to
        Smithfield Fiduciary LLC (“Smithfield”)
        on
        January 20, 2006 pursuant to which the Company, inter
        alia,
        granted
        to Smithfield the right to purchase a $1,000,000 principal amount debenture
        convertible at $1.25 per share (the “AIR”).

      


      The
        Initial Exercise Date (as that term is defined in the AIR) of the AIR is
        expressed therein as the 181st
        day
        after the date thereof. The Company hereby confirms that, in consideration
        of
        the exercise of the AIR by Smithfield and the delivery to the Company of
        a
        Notice of Exercise in respect thereof on or before the close of business
        on
        February 28, 2006, the Company has agreed to abridge the Initial Exercise
        Date
        and to honor the aforementioned Notice of Exercise.

      


      Yours
        truly,

      


      Generex
        Biotechnology Corporation

      


      /s/
        Mark
        A. Fletcher

      


      


      Mark
        A.
        Fletcher

      Executive
        Vice-President, General Counsel

      maf:hs
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                       TERAYON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.
              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Arthur T. Taylor, the Chief Executive Officer of Terayon Communication
Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that to the best of my knowledge:

         (i)      the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K dated March 15,
                  2004 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (ii)     the information contained in the said Form 10-K fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 15, 2004                            By: /s/ Arthur T. Taylor
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Arthur T. Taylor
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor
Trust  Series B (Series B), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Bs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series B.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer  
|Kenneth A. Shewer      
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 30, 2005
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust IV and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended December 29, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kahtleen Skero, Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General
Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ KATHLEEN SKERO
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Kathleen Skero *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: March 23, 2007
_____________________

*  Kathleen Skero functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.