alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11.1

STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
AG-CHEM EQUIPMENT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The per share computations are based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the periods.

                                                      Three Months Ended
                                                      ------------------
                                                         December 31,
                                                         ------------
                                                     1999           1998
                                                   --------       -------
Shares outstanding at beginning of period             9,595         9,640

Repurchase and retirement of common stock                (3)          (13)
                                                   --------       -------

Shares outstanding at end of period                   9,592         9,627
                                                   ========       =======

Weighted average shares outstanding                   9,592         9,639
                                                   ========       =======

Net loss                                           $ (2,024)      $  (356)
                                                   ========       =======

Loss per common share                              $  (0.21)      $ (0.04)
                                                   ========       =======



The Company has no potentially dilutive common shares.


                                       15
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00454-CR

Jerry Lee Berry, Sr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 53,292, HONORABLE GORDON G. ADAMS, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Jerry Lee Berry, Sr., pleaded guilty to evading arrest with a motor vehicle. See

Tex. Pen. Code Ann. ' 38.04 (West Supp. 2003). The district court adjudged him guilty and assessed 

punishment at incarceration in a state jail for two years. See id. ' 38.04(b)(2).

Appellant=s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and 

without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by 

presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be 

advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 

553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of 

counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate 

record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
2

We have reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and 

without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel=s motion to 

withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

 

Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: December 12, 2002

Do Not Publish
#### CORNELL v. STATE.

No. 22071.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 15, 1942.

No attorney for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*87HAWKINS, Presiding'Judge.

Appellant was charged by complaint and information with selling whisky in dry territory.

Apparently he was tried, convicted and his punishment assessed at a fine of one hundred dollars, but we find in the record neither a judgment of conviction nor any notice of appeal. In the absence of either, this court is without jurisdiction.

The appeal is dismissed.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3289 

To provide funds during the lapse of appropriations for the payment of 

military death gratuities and funeral and related transportation and 

housing expenses through the transfer of unobligated amounts in the 

Health Insurance Reform Implementation Fund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2013 

Mr. KINGSTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide funds during the lapse of appropriations for the 

payment of military death gratuities and funeral and 

related transportation and housing expenses through the 

transfer of unobligated amounts in the Health Insurance 

Reform Implementation Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3289 IH

1 SECTION 1. SOURCE OF FUNDS FOR PAYMENT OF MILI2 TARY DEATH GRATUITIES AND FUNERAL AND 

3 RELATED TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING 

4 EXPENSES. 

5 During any period for which interim or full-year ap6 propriations for fiscal year 2014 are not in effect for a 

7 purpose specified in this section, the Secretary of Health 

8 and Human Services shall transfer, from unobligated 

9 amounts in the Health Insurance Reform Implementation 

10 Fund established by section 1005 of the Health Care and 

11 Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111– 

12 152), to the Secretary of Defense sufficient funds to en13 able the Secretary of Defense to provide the following ben14 efits on behalf of members of the Armed Forces who die 

15 during such period: 

16 (1) The payment of a death gratuity under sec17 tions 1475–1477 and 1489 of title 10, United States 

18 Code. 

19 (2) The payment or reimbursement for funeral 

20 and burial expenses authorized under sections 1481 

21 and 1482 of title 10, United States Code. 

22 (3) The payment or reimbursement of author23 ized funeral travel and travel related to the dignified 

24 transfer of remains and unit memorial services 

25 under section 481f of title 37, United States Code. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3289 IH

1 (4) The temporary continuation of a basic al2 lowance of housing for dependents of members dying 

3 on active duty, as authorized by section 403(l) of 

4 title 37, United States Code. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0198

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF:

M.D.U-N.,

 A Youth in Need of Care.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Mary Jane Knisely, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 2 2020

12/02/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0198
Charlotte, North Carolina 28288
(704) 374-6787

LOGO FIRST UNION





                        MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION REGARDING

                   COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS

As of and for the year ended December 3l, 1997, First Union Mortgage Corporation
has complied in all material respects with the minimum  servicing  standards set
forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's UNFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION
PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS. As of and for this same period, First
Union  Mortgage  Corporation  had if  effect  a  fidelity  bond and  errors  and
omissions policies in the amounts of $100 million and $20 million, respectively.

/s/ Karin Patrick
/Karin Patrick, Senior Vice President                          March 13, 1998
                                                               Date

/s/ James Maynor
James Maynor, President                                        March 13,1998
                                                               Date
exv10w10w3



 






Exhibit 10.10.3




AMENDMENT
NO. 3 TO

1998 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN




     The Trinity Industries, Inc. 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “1998 Plan”) is hereby
amended as follows:




	 	1.	 	The first sentence in Section 2 of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:






“A committee designated by the Board of Directors which shall
consist of not less than two members of the Board who shall be
appointed by or in accordance with authority delegated by the
Board,”




	 	2.	 	The effective date of this Amendment to the 1998 Plan shall
be May 3, 2002.





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized
officer of the Company as of May 3, 2002.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Michael G. Fortado
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Tricom, S.A. (the “Company”) for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Hector CastroNoboa, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
|                         |   | /s/ HECTOR CASTRO NOBOA  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
| Dated: October 29, 2007 |   | Héctor Castro Noboa |
|                    |   | Chief Executive Officer  |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3256 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3256

 Making continuing appropriations for all departments and agencies of 
            the Federal Government, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 2013

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 Making continuing appropriations for all departments and agencies of 
            the Federal Government, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fiscal Sanity Act for 
Appropriations''.

SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is hereby appropriated for 300 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act--
            (1) for each project or activity for which budget authority 
        was provided in the Consolidated and Further Continuing 
        Appropriations Act, 2013 (Public Law 113-6), an amount equal to 
        the budget authority provided in such Act, as reduced pursuant 
        to the Presidential sequestration order dated March 1, 2013, to 
        remain available for a comparable period of availability; and
            (2) for entitlements and other mandatory payments whose 
        budget authority was provided in appropriations Acts for fiscal 
        year 2013, and for activities under the Food and Nutrition Act 
        of 2008, such amounts as may be necessary to maintain program 
        levels as they existed on September 30, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 18.01 May 2, 2005 Board of Directors
CSK Auto Corporation
645 E. Missouri Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85012 Dear Directors: We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-K filing pursuant
to Item 601 of Regulation S-K. We have audited the consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended January 30, 2005 and issued our report thereon dated May 2, 2005.
Note 1 to the financial statements describes a change in accounting principle from the last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method of inventory accounting to the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method of
accounting. It should be understood that the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting
over another for inventory has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting literature, and
in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on managements determination that this change
in accounting principle is preferable. Based on our reading of managements stated reasons and
justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-K, and our discussions with
management as to their judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the
change, we concur with management that such change represents, in the Companys circumstances, the
adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity with Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 20. Very truly yours, /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Phoenix, Arizona 1
EXHIBIT 12

                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST III
                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING III, L.P.
                      COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
          COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       For the Period January 16, 1998 to December 25, 1998
                                       ----------------------------------------------------
                                       Merrill Lynch Preferred      Merrill Lynch Preferred
                                           Capital Trust III            Funding III, L.P.
                                       -----------------------      -----------------------

<S>                                           <C>                          <C>        
Earnings                                      $51,726,821                  $60,684,523
                                              ===========                  ===========

Fixed charges                                 $        --                  $        --
                                                                         
Preferred securities distribution                                        
  requirements                                 50,175,008                   51,726,821
                                              -----------                  -----------
                                                                         
Total combined fixed charges and                                         
  preferred securities distributions          $50,175,008                  $51,726,821
                                              ===========                  ===========
                                                                         
Ratio of earnings to combined                                            
  fixed charges and preferred                                            
  securities distributions                           1.03                         1.17
</TABLE>
Opinion issued May 28, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00211-CV

———————————

OMONIEFE MARY BAZUNU, Appellant

V.

MONEYGRAM PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2014-46325

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Omoniefe Mary Bazunu, has neither paid the required fees nor 

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; 

see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); 

Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts 
2

of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket 

No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1). 

After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not 

adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(b).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of 

prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown.
##### 



Exhibit 12
 ADVANTA CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 
 Three Months Ended
    
    Nine Months Ended($ in thousands)
    
    September 30,
    
    September 30,2007
    
    2006
    
    2007
    
    2006Income from continuing operations
    
    $
    19,482
    
    
    $
    21,120
    
    
    $
    63,642
    
    
    $
    66,070Income tax expense
    
    
    12,248
    
    
    
    13,222
    
    
    
    40,009
    
    
    
    41,361Earnings before income taxes
    
    
    31,730
    
    
    
    34,342
    
    
    
    103,651
    
    
    
    107,431Fixed charges:Interest on debt, deposits and other
borrowings
    
    
    23,289
    
    
    
    17,360
    
    
    
    64,850
    
    
    
    46,215Interest on subordinated debt payable
to preferred securities trust
    
    
    2,317
    
    
    
    2,289
    
    
    
    6,951
    
    
    
    6,868One-third of all rentals
    
    
    477
    
    
    
    463
    
    
    
    1,408
    
    
    
    1,367Total fixed charges
    
    
    26,083
    
    
    
    20,112
    
    
    
    73,209
    
    
    
    54,450Earnings before income taxes and fixed charges
    
    $
    57,813
    
    
    $
    54,454
    
    
    $
    176,860
    
    
    $
    161,881Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(1)
    
    
    2.22
    x
    
    
    2.71
    x
    
    
    2.42
    x
    
    
    2.97
    x
 
 (1)
    
    For purposes of computing these ratios, earnings represent income before income
taxes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense and one-third
(the portion deemed representative of the interest factor) of rental expense on
operating leases. Fixed charges do not include interest expense related to
unrecognized tax benefits, which we classify as income tax expense.
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 306 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 16, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

For the relief of Corina de Chalup Turcinovic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 306 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR CORINA 

2 DE CHALUP TURCINOVIC. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

4 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Act, Corina de Chalup Turcinovic shall be eligible for 

6 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

7 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi8 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi9 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

10 of status to lawful permanent resident. 

11 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Corina de Chalup 

12 Turcinovic enters the United States before the filing dead13 line specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to 

14 have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise 

15 eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 

16 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 

17 of the enactment of this Act. 

18 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

19 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap20 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica21 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

22 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

23 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

24 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res25 idence to Corina de Chalup Turcinovic, the Secretary of 

26 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, durVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:23 Jul 16, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H306.RFS H306

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 306 RFS 

1 ing the current or next following fiscal year, the total num2 ber of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 

3 of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) 

4 of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, 

5 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail6 able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under 

7 section 202(e) of such Act. 

8 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

9 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

10 parents, brothers, and sisters of Corina de Chalup 

11 Turcinovic shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be ac12 corded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigra13 tion and Nationality Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 15, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
toXcel LLC

 Toxicology & Regulatory Affairs 

 7140 Heritage Village Plaza 

 P.O. Box 363 

 Gainesville, VA 20156 

Phone: (703) 754-0248 Fax: (703) 310-6950 

VIA E-MAIL and HAND-DELIVER HARDCOPY

July 23, 2010 

Ms. Cynthia Giles-Parker FB/RD (7505P) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

One Potomac Yard 

2777 S. Crystal Drive 

Arlington, VA 22202 

RE: Furfural Technical (Reg. No. 75753-2) ; 

MULTIGUARD PROTECT ®

 EC (Reg. No. 75753-1) 

Dear Cynthia: 

On behalf of the registrant, Agriguard Company, LLC (“Agriguard”), we would like to thank you 

and your colleagues within RD for thoroughly considering Agriguard’s comments in response to 

the issues raised in the RD Proposed Decision and the Agency’s supporting science documents 

that were in the Furfural Registration Actions docket (EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0722). While some of 

these issues raised by our comments appear to have been resolved through revisions of the 

draft label for Multiguard Protect® EC, we appreciate the fact that further review by science staff 

within HED and EFED may be required to address some remaining issues including risk 

characterization, conditional data requirements, the methyl bromide alternative status of 

Furfural, and clarity on golf course tee and green acreage size. Following discussions with RD, 

Agriguard believes that these and other issues can be satisfactorily resolved through further 

discussions and/or PRIA actions following registration. 

Accordingly, we request that any remaining comments set forth by the registrant during the 

Public Comment period ending June 21, 2010 be reserved for consideration by the Agency 

following the proposed registration for use on golf course turf (tees and greens) and sod farms. 

 

Sincerely, 

Alan C. Katz 

Authorized Representative for Agriguard Company, LLC 

cc: M. Waller (PM-21; 7505P) 

 T. Gibson (7505P) 

 J. Herndon (7505P) 

 J. Myers (Agriguard) 

 G.Burger (Agriguard) 

 J. Hensley (Agriguard) 

 P. Quinn (The Accord Group)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED KEL LY NIKIA GALLOWAY , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 23

- 6 LT Case No. 16

- 2018

- CF

- 001363

- AXXX S TATE O F FLORIDA ,

A ppellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed June 30, 2023 A ppeal from t he Circuit Court for D uval County , M ar k B or ello , Judge. M eliss a Joy Ford, of Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant. A s hley Moody, A ttorney General, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee. PER CURIA M

. A FFIRMED. LAMBERT , C.J. , WALLIS and PRATT , JJ., concur.