alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w1



 








Exhibit 10.1




February 21, 2006




First Bank of Delaware

1608 Walnut Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

Attention: Alonzo J. Primus




Re: Installment Loan Marketing and Servicing Agreement by and between First Bank of Delaware and
ACE Cash Express, Inc. (as amended, the “Agreement”)



Dear Alonzo:




Each undefined capitalized term used in this letter shall have the meaning ascribed to it in the
Agreement. When countersigned, this letter will constitute an amendment to the Agreement,
effective as of February 21, 2006.



Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Agreement and without any liability
arising therefor, the parties to the Agreement hereby agree that ACE may cease to offer Loans in
the State of Texas as soon as ACE elects to do so.



Please evidence your agreement with the foregoing by countersigning a copy of this letter and
providing a countersigned copy to the undersigned at your earliest convenience.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,





ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ WALTER E. EVANS
 	 
	 	 	Walter E. Evans, Senior Vice President
and General Counsel 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 



AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:







FIRST BANK OF DELAWARE







By: /s/ ALONZO J. PRIMUS

 



Name: Alonzo J. Primus

Title:    Executive Vice President, National Consumer Products
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27475]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

October 19, 2000.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before November 27, 
2000 to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1449.
    Regulation Project Number: IA-57-94 Final.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Cash Reporting by Court Clerks.
    Description: Section 6050I(g) imposes a reporting requirement on 
criminal court clerks that receive more than $10,000 in cash as bail. 
The IRS will use the information to identify individuals with large 
cash incomes. Clerks must also furnish the information to the United 
States Attorney for the jurisdiction in which the individual charged 
with the crime resides and to each person posting the bond whose name 
appears on Form 8300.
    Respondents: Federal Government, State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 250.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 30 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion, Annually.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 125 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service, Room 
5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-27475 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
```
#### Ex parte MUSE.

No. 25288.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 18, 1951.

No attorney, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is an original application for the writ of habeas corpus.

Relator here and relator in Ex parte Muse, Tex.Crim.App., 233 S.W.2d 125, is the same person. As shown in that case, we held that the order attempting to cumu-late a Pecos County conviction with a prior conviction of appellant in Kerr County was ineffective.

Relator, now in this proceeding, attacks an order of the District Court of Llano County attempting to cumulate appellant’s conviction in that court with the Pecos County conviction above referred to.

*705For the reason assigned in Ex parte Muse, supra, as well as Ex parte Johnson, Tex.Crim.App., 218 S.W.2d 200, the order was ineffective to cumulate the Llano1 conviction with the Pecos conviction.

Such holding, however, by no means warrants relator’s discharge from the penitentiary.

The record before us fails to reflect that relator is entitled to his discharge from custody, and the writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Opinion approved by the court.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3216 

To ensure that members of the Armed Forces and Federal law enforcement 

officers continue to receive their pay and allowances despite a shutdown 

of the Federal Government or in the event that the debt of the United 

States Government reaches the statutory limit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2013 

Mr. KINGSTON (for himself and Mr. GOHMERT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services and the Judiciary, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To ensure that members of the Armed Forces and Federal 

law enforcement officers continue to receive their pay 

and allowances despite a shutdown of the Federal Government or in the event that the debt of the United 

States Government reaches the statutory limit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3216 IH

1 SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF PAY AND ALLOWANCES FOR MEM2 BERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND FEDERAL 

3 LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS DURING FED4 ERAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN OR DESPITE 

5 REACHING STATUTORY DEBT LIMIT. 

6 (a) CONTINUATION DURING A FEDERAL GOVERN7 MENT SHUTDOWN.—During any funding gap during fiscal 

8 year 2014 when interim or full-year appropriations for the 

9 following activities have not been enacted, from amounts 

10 in the general fund of the Treasury not otherwise appro11 priated, the Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer to 

12 the head of the appropriate Executive agency such 

13 amounts as are necessary to continue such activities: 

14 (1) The payment of pay and allowances for 

15 members of the Armed Forces (including reserve 

16 components thereof) on active duty. 

17 (2) The payment of salaries and benefits for 

18 sworn Federal law enforcement officers. 

19 (b) CONTINUATION DESPITE REACHING STATUTORY

20 DEBT LIMIT.—In the event that the debt of the United 

21 States Government reaches the statutory limit as defined 

22 in section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, the fol23 lowing shall take equal priority over all other obligations 

24 incurred by the United States Government: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3216 IH

1 (1) The payment of pay and allowances for 

2 members of the Armed Forces (including reserve 

3 components thereof) on active duty. 

4 (2) The payment of salaries and benefits for 

5 sworn Federal law enforcement officers. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64264-64265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27512]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-382]


Entergy Operations Inc.; Notice of Withdrawal of Application for 
Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Entergy Operations Inc. (the licensee), to withdraw its 
May 28, 1998, application, as supplemented, for proposed amendment to 
Facility Operating License No. NPF-38 for the Waterford Steam Electric 
Station, Unit 3, located in St. Charles Parish, Louisiana.
    The proposed amendment would have modified facility Technical 
Specification 3.7.1.2 and Surveillance Requirement 4.7.1.2 for the 
emergency feedwater system.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on November 14, 
1998 (63 FR 59593). However, by letter dated September 20, 2000, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated May 28, 1998, as supplemented by 
letters dated January 31 and July 27, 2000, and the licensee's letter 
dated September 20, 2000, which withdrew the application for license 
amendment. These documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at 
the NRC's Public Document Room, located at One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available 
records

[[Page 64265]]

will be accessible electronically from the ADAMS Public Library 
component on the NRC Web site (the Electronic Reading Room).

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day of October 2000.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
N. Kalyanam,
Project Manager, Project Directorate IV & Decommissioning, Division of 
Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 00-27512 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131217 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131217 

 COA: 267352 

Berrien CC: 03-402611-FH 

ROBERT LEE REED,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 6, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 12
 ADVANTA CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Three Months Ended($ in thousands)
    
    March 31,2008
    
    2007Net income
    
    $
    18,362
    
    
    $
    21,448Income tax expense
    
    
    11,328
    
    
    
    13,828Earnings before income taxes
    
    
    29,690
    
    
    
    35,276Fixed charges:Interest on debt, deposits and other borrowings
    
    
    25,827
    
    
    
    20,245Interest on subordinated debt payable
to preferred securities trust
    
    
    2,317
    
    
    
    2,317One-third of all rentals
    
    
    467
    
    
    
    474Total fixed charges
    
    
    28,611
    
    
    
    23,036Earnings before income taxes and fixed charges
    
    $
    58,301
    
    
    $
    58,312Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(1)
    
    
    2.04
    x
    
    
    2.53
    x
 
 (1)
    
    For purposes of computing these ratios, earnings represent income before income
taxes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense and one-third
(the portion deemed representative of the interest factor) of rental expense on
operating leases. Fixed charges do not include interest expense related to
unrecognized tax benefits, which we classify as income tax expense.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**MICHAEL JASON PENDELTON,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY,** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 9 WM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 20th day of February, 2015, the Application fo r Leave to File** 

**Original Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or**

**Extraordinary Relief and the Application for an Imme diate Hearing are**  DENIED

**.**
#### BOWEN v. STATE.

No. 22140.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 20, 1942.

*109Alex P. Pope, of Tyler, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense is driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $200.

The record before us is without statement of facts or bills of exception.

Reversible error is not reflected by the record.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

I, James E. Laurent, President and Chief Executive Officer of Sunair
Electronics, Inc. (the "Company"), have executed this certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31,
2002 (the "Report"). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this certificate as of the
13th day of February 2003.

/s/ James E. Laurent
--------------------
James E. Laurent
President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.37



 Exhibit 10.37 
 Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers 
 The 2006 base salaries for Dominion’s named executive officers are
as follows: Thomas F. Farrell, II, President and Chief Executive Officer—$1,000,000; Thomas N. Chewning, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer—$600,000; Duane C. Radtke, Executive Vice President (President and CEO-Dominion
Exploration & Production segment)—$575,000; and Mark F. McGettrick, President and Chief Executive Officer – Generation segment—$525,000. 
 Dominion’s named executive officers in the 2006 Proxy Statement (which will be filed on or around March 14, 2006) includes Mr. Thos. E. Capps, who served as Chief Executive Officer for the entirety of 2005 and retired as of
January 1, 2006.
#### MALONE v. STATE.

No. 22911.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 21, 1944.

Eugene F. Mathis, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction on a charge of possessing whisky for the purpose of sale in a dry area with a fine of $500.

We quote from the brief filed by the State’s attorney,' as follows:

> “The appellant brings forward two bills of exception in which he complains of the action of the trial court in admitting in evidence, over the timely objection of the appellant, the affidavit and purported search warrant for the reason that same were hearsay as to the defendant, and, secondly, upon the ground that no property was described in the purported search warrant. We think both of these contentions are well founded. This Court said in Rockholt v. State [136 Tex.Cr.R. 479], 126 S.W.2d 488 [489]:

> “ ‘Appellant complains of the introduction in evidence of the search warrant on the ground that same was hearsay, inflammatory and prejudicial. We are of the opinion that appellant’s position is well-taken. This court has held that a search warrant is not admissible in evidence. before the jury. See Seay v. State, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 252, 115 S.W.2d 419.’

> “In 38 Texas Jurisprudence, page 54, section 31, the following general rule is stated:

> “ ‘Not only the affidavit for a search warrant but the warrant itself must describe the place to be searched or the thing to be seized. There is no doubt as to this requirement for both the Constitution and the statute expressly declare that no warrant to search any place or to seize anything shall issue without describing them as near as may be.’

> “Also see Combs v. State [141 Tex.Cr.R. 476], 149 S.W.2d 971; Miller v. State [134 Tex.Cr.R. 118], 114 S.W.2d 244; Article 666—20, Vernon’s Annotated Penal Code, and authorities cited under Notes 3, 7 and 9.”

The foregoing is a fair statement of the bills of exception and the law involved.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a 

BRAZOS LICENSING AND 

DEVELOPMENT,

Plaintiff,

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-571-ADA

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Please take notice that attorney Jeffrey Huang of the law firm ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, 

PLLC appears as counsel of record for Plaintiff WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC d/b/a BRAZOS 

LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT. Mr. Huang hereby requests that all notices required to be 

given, and all papers required to be served in the above-entitled and numbered cause, be copied 

to and served upon him.

Dated: July 31, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jeffrey Huang

Jeffrey Huang

California State Bar No. 266774

ETHERIDGE LAW GROUP, PLLC

2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120 / 324

Southlake, Texas 76092

Telephone: (817) 470-7249

Facsimile: (817) 887-5950

jeff@etheridgelaw.com

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 14 Filed 07/31/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that the foregoing document was served upon all counsel of record via the 

Court's CM/ECF electronic filing system in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure on July 31, 2020.

/s/ Jeffrey Huang

Jeffrey Huang

Case 6:20-cv-00571-ADA Document 14 Filed 07/31/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27568]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA--04130]


Brown Wooten Mills, Inc., Ballston Plant, Mount Airy, NC; Notice 
of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment 
assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with 
section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), an investigation was initiated on 
August 14, 2000, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers 
at Brown Wooten Mills, Inc., Ballston Plant, Mount Airy, North 
Carolina.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition for NAFTA-TAA be 
withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve 
no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 10th day of October 2000.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-27568 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2734]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel, Brooklyn District

AGENCY:  Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  An open meeting of the Brooklyn District Citizen Advocacy 
Panel will be held in Uniondale, New York.

DATES:  The meeting will be held Thursday, March 2, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen Cain at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-
488-3555.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an operational meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held 
Thursday, March 2, 2000, 7:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. at the Long Island 
Marriott Hotel at 101 James Doolittle Boulevard 9, Uniondale, NY 11553. 
For more information or to confirm attendance, notification of intent 
to attend the meeting must be made with Eileen Cain. Mrs. Cain can be 
reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3555. The public is invited to 
make oral comments from 7:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on Thursday, March 2, 
2000. Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. If you would 
like to have the CAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-
912-1227 or 718-488-3555, or writeEileen Cain, CAP Office, P.O. Box R, 
Brooklyn, NY 11202. The Agenda will include the following: 
introductions of the panel and open discussions with the public.


    Note: Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could 
prevent effective advance notice.


    Dated: January 29, 2000.
John J. Mannion,
Program Manager, Taxpayer Advocate Service.
[FR Doc. 00-2734 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001051830
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                           JUN-19-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-25-1998
<CASH>                                             0
<SECURITIES>                             412,372,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              7,340,222
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         419,712,222
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           419,712,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      7,340,222
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                              400,000,000
<COMMON>                                  12,372,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             419,712,222
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          15,577,765
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           15,577,765
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       15,577,765
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                              15,577,765
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
        


</TABLE>