alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

                        LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

     The following table lists the Registrant's significant subsidiaries, as
defined in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X, as at December 31, 2003. The table
includes the legal name of the subsidiary and its jurisdiction of incorporation


     NAME

     Call Tel Corporation  (Panama)
     GFN Comunicaciones, S. A. (Dominican Republic)
     TCN Dominicana, S. A. (Dominican Republic)
     TRICOM Centroamerica, S. A. (Panama)
     TRICOM Latinoamerica, S. A. (Cayman Islands)
     TRICOM USA, Inc. (Delaware)
**Exhibit 32(i)**

**CERTIFICATION**

******PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350**

In connect
with the quarterly report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended November 30, 2006 to be filed with Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas P. Taylor,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods covered by the Report.

It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

|Date: January 12, 2007 | By: | /s/ Douglas P. Taylor                     
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                       |     | Douglas P. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF NATIONAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC.(Each Subsidiary is wholly-owned, directly or indirectly, by National Equipment Services, Inc.)

|Subsidiary                                         |  | State or Jurisdiction of
Subsidiary's Incorporation
or Organization
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|NES Equipment Services Corp. f/k/a Falconite, Inc. |  | IL                                                                 
|NES Indiana Partners, Inc.                         |  | DE                                                                 
|NES Traffic Safety L.P.                            |  | DE                                                                 
|NES Equipment Rental L.P.                          |  | DE                                                                 
|Rebel Studio Rentals, Inc.                         |  | CA                                                                 
|NES Shoring Acquisition, Inc.                      |  | DE                                                                 
|NES Partners, Inc. f/k/a Plank Management, Inc.    |  | TX                                                                 
|NES Companies L.P.                                 |  | DE                                                                 
|NES Equipment Services, Inc. (Canada               |  | Canada                                                             
|NES Management Service Corp.                       |  | DE                                                                 
|Falconite Rebuild Center, Inc.                     |  | KY                                                                 

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-08-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,401
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (711)
<INVENTORY>                                     91,906
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,952
<PP&E>                                          49,669
<DEPRECIATION>                                (33,581)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,574
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,667
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,188
<SALES>                                        185,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               185,037
<CGS>                                          133,918
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  133,918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   135
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,225
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,158
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,323
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,835
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,835
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71
        



</TABLE>
Opinion issued February 4, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-20-00770-CV

———————————

NASSER CHEHAB, Appellant

V.

BBVA USA AND J&R RECOVERY LLC D/B/A SEIZED RECOVERY, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2020-49197

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Nasser Chehab, has neither paid the required fees nor established 

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.

GOV’T CODE §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; Order, Fees Charged in the 

Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial 
2

Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). 

After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not 

adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of 

prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Rivas-Molloy.
## D e p art m 

## ent o f 

# E ner g

# y Washington, DC 20585 November 25, 1998

DISTRIBUTION T RA NSFORMERS TEST PROCEDURE

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 

# A

On November 12, 1998, the Department published a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding on test procedures for electric distribution transformers. The Department is convening a public hearing on January 6, 1999, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. to gather information, data, and comments regarding the electric distribution transformers test procedures rulemaking. The hearing will be held at the U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave, SW., Washington, D.C. 20585, in Room 1E-245.

The Department is particularly interested in receiving comments and views of interested parties concerning the following, but participants need not limit their statements to these topics: 

### ® The alternative test procedures proposed; ® Adequacy of TP 2 to meet the requirements of users, such as utilities and contractors who specify transformers for commercial and industrial applications (e.g., retail, industrial, and office buildings); ® Distribution transformers not subject to the test procedures; ® Grouping of transformers for testing purposes, as manifested by the definition of a basic model; and • The sampling plan for compliance (The Department is particularly interested in discussing how small populations should be handled.)

In addition, the less than and greater than symbols on Table 3 of the proposed rule, 63 FR 63366, were inadvertently reversed. We expect a correction notice to be published in the Federal Register correcting this error. Copies of the draft agenda (enclosure 1), the proposed rule (enclosure 2) and the corrected Table 3 (enclosure 3) are provided.

Requests to speak at the hearing and written copies of statements, must be received by the Department no later than 4:00 p.m., December 23, 1998. The Department requests that a computer diskette (WordPerfect' 6.1) of each statement also be provided at that time. Please send ten (10) written copies of statements and computer diskette to U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, EE-43, Docket No. EE-DET-97-550, Room 1J-018, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121. If you have any questions, please call Ms. Kathi Epping at (202) 586-7425. If you plan to attend the hearing, please contact Ms. Brenda Edwards-Jones at (202) 586-2945. Also, please see the section on "Public Hearing", section IV. B. under "Supplementary Information", in the enclosed Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

Sincerely,

Michael JfMcCabe, Director Office of Codes and Standards Building Technology, State and Community Programs Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Enclosures

Printed with soy Ink on recycled paper
exv4w7



 





Exhibit 4.7




Summary of Employment Arrangements




between Bayer Aktiengesellschaft




and Dr. Richard Pott




Term: Dr. Pott was appointed member of the Board of Management of the Company by the
Supervisory Board effective May 1, 2002. The term will expire on April 30, 2007.


Compensation: The aggregate remuneration of Dr. Pott for 2005 is comprised of the following
elements:



Base salary: EUR 412,236. Dr. Pott also received remuneration in kind and other payments
totaling EUR 39,044 and consisting mainly of amounts such as the value assigned for taxation
purposes to the use of a company car.



Fixed supplement: EUR 170,647



Variable Bonus: EUR 843,713 (determined by attainment of the group EBITDA target)



Stock-based compensation: The current entitlement for 2005 — along with compensation
arising from previous years’ programs, parts of which are not yet earned was EUR 284,248.




     Retirement: Dr. Pott is entitled to receive pension up from the age of 60. The yearly
pension entitlement is based on at least 30% of the sum of the last yearly base salary and fixed
supplement. This percentage increases over time depending on years of service as a Board member and
determines the final target pension level which is capped at 80%. Upon expiration of the current
term the level of 80% will be reached. These amounts are in addition to any amounts received as a
result of his participation in Bayer’s Employee Pension Plan (See Item 6).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.A


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2003, of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John W. Somerhalder II, Chairman of the Board, certify (i) that the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ John W. Somerhalder II
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John W. Somerhalder II
                                           Chairman of the Board
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

                                           August 13, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and will be retained by Tennessee Gas
Pipeline Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**Exhibit        99.6**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED **

**PURSUANT        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By: | /s/                  David G.P. Allan |   |
|-----|---------------------------------------|--------|

|  |   | David                    G.P. Allan |
|--|--------|-------------------------------------|

|  |   | Chief                  Executive Officer |
|--|--------|------------------------------------------|
# **Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of Click2learn, Inc., on Form 10-K for the period endedDecember 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Form 10-K”), I, Kevin M. Oakes, Chief Executive Officer andI, John D. Atherly, Chief Financial Officer, of Click2learn, Inc., certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Form 10-K fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Form10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Click2learn, Inc.

 

Dated: March 17,2003

 

 
| /s/ Kevin M.  Oakes      |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Kevin M. Oakes           |
| Chief Executive  Officer |
|                     |
| /s/ John D.  Atherly     |   |
| John D. Atherly          |
| Chief Financial  Officer |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Click2learn, Inc. and will be retained byClick2learn, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

I,Brian R. Ervine, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge, the Annual Report of Evolving Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Kfor the annual period ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-Kfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Evolving Systems, Inc.

 
| /s/  Brian R. Ervine                                  |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                  |   |
| Brian  R. Ervine                                      |   |
| Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| March 11,  2009                                  |   |

 

 

This certification is furnished with this Annual Report on Form 10-Kpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Suchcertification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, exceptto the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27572]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-38,013]


Robert Bosch Corporation, Hendersonville, TN; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on August 28, 2000 in response to a worker petition which 
was dated on August 3, 2000 on behalf of workers at Robert Bosch 
Corporation, Hendersonville, Tennessee.
    An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers 
remains in effect (TA-W-36,523). Consequently, further investigation in 
this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been 
terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 6th day of October 2000.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-27572 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 1607
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL, and minor child , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. THE MCCLATCHY COMPANY; MCCLATCHY INVESTMENT COMPANY; MCCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS, INC.; THE MCCLATCHY COMPANY, d/b/a The Charlotte Observer; DOES , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Frank D. Whitney , District Judge. ( 3:22

- cv - 00166

- FDW

- DSC )

Submitted : November 17, 2022 Decided: November 22, 2022

Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1607 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the court’s prior order denying McDaniel’s application to proceed in forma paup eris (IFP), and dismissing McDaniel’s civil action without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. The court denied McDaniel leave to proceed IFP and afforded her 21 days to pay the filing fee, which she did not. Because the district court did not a buse its discretion in denying McDaniel’s application to proceed IFP, see Dillard v. Liberty Loan Corp. , 626 F.2d 363, 364 (4th Cir. 1980) (providing standard of review), and McDaniel did not advance a viable basis for the Rule 60(b) motion, we discern no error in the court’s order dismissing without prejudice McDaniel’s civil action for failing to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. McDaniel

v. The McClatchy Co. , No. 3:22

- cv - 00166

- FDW

- DSC (W.D.N.C. May 23, 2022). We di spense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1607 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
--_

•.._--

September 1990

Focus

Background

Washington residents have identified SSO sites around the state which may be

contaminated with hazardous wastes.Wehave looked at these sites and ranked what

we believe are the most severely contaminated on the Hazardous Sites List. A listing

of ranked sites and their status is required under the ModelToxies ControlAct.

The Hazardous Sites Ust will eventually contain ranking aDd status information on

all state sites needing further cleanup wort. Ecologyhas already identified

additionalsites to be ranked over the next five months, aslite hazard assessments

are completed. These ranked sites are expected to beadded to the Hazardous Sites

List in January, 199LThereafter, siteswill be ranked and added to the listabout

everysix months.

How Are Sites Ranked?

Sites are ranked using theWashingtonRankingMethod Working together,

Ecology and the Science Advisory Boarddeveloped the ranking sytem to categorize

contaminated sites based on the potential threat theypose to human health and the

environment. Sites are ranked on a scale of one to five, with one representing the

.highestlevel of concern and five the lowest. When ranJcin& a site, the primary

exposure routes that could pose a riskto the public and the environment are taken

into consideration. These are air, surface water and ground water.

Hazard ranking is not an evaluation of the absolute risk a site poses to human health

and the environment, Rather, a site's rant is relative to the scores received by other

ranked sites in the state. Information gathered during the site hazard assessment is

used to determine a site'srelative risk. --

Can Site RankJngs Qange?

A site'srank can change. Ecologymay re-rank a site if additional information is

discovered that changes thesite's relative health and environmental risk. The

rankingsystem works similar to grading on a curve.The highest scoringsites are

ranked asones and the lowestas fives. Thus, adding or removing sitesfrom the list

over time mayalso affed a site's rank. .

A site may be removed from the list only ifthe site is cleaned up cdJong term

monitoring is conducted to ensure the dcanup is adequate to protect the publicand

the environment. In addition, a publicreview and comment period will be provided

for any site Ecology proposes to remove from the Hazardous Sites List.