alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3176 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3176

 To reauthorize the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 
                     1991, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2013

Mr. DeFazio (for himself, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Costa, Mr. Ben Ray Lujan 
of New Mexico, Mr. Sablan, Ms. Chu, Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. Holt, Mr. Rangel, 
 Mr. Grijalva, and Ms. Hanabusa) introduced the following bill; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 
                     1991, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RECLAMATION STATES EMERGENCY DROUGHT RELIEF ACT 
              OF 1991.

    (a) Termination of Authority.--Section 104(c) of the Reclamation 
States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 (43 U.S.C. 2214(c)) is 
amended by striking ``2012'' and inserting ``2018''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 301 of the 
Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 (43 U.S.C. 
2241) is amended by striking ``2012'' and inserting ``2018''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WACO DIVISION 

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC,

 Plaintiff 

-vHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., 

LTD., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES 

USA INC. 

 Defendants 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

W-20-CV-00541 

W-20-CV-00544 

ORDER TO PAY TECHNICAL ADVISOR 

The Court previously appointed Dr. Joshua J. Yi to serve as a technical advisor on this 

case. The Court has reviewed Dr. Yi’s invoice for services through today and finds the requested 

amount to be reasonable and necessary. As such, the Court ORDERS payment to be promptly 

made as follows: 

Plaintiff: $12,348.49 

Defendant: $12,348.49 

Dr. Yi will separately provide deposit instructions. 

SIGNED this 1st day of June, 2021. 

ALAN D ALBRIGHT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 6:20-cv-00541-ADA Document 66 Filed 06/01/21 Page 1 of 1
Letter Agreement between Mattel and Bryan G. Stockton



 EXHIBIT 10.31 
  
 March 17, 2005 
  
 Bryan G. Stockton 
 EVP International 
  
 Dear Bryan, 
  
 I am pleased to inform you that if you accept this letter agreement, you will be named as a participant eligible for enhanced benefits under the Mattel, Inc. 2005
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “New SERP”), subject to various terms and conditions, including those set forth in this letter agreement. 
  

Because of the enactment of a new federal income tax law affecting nonqualified deferred compensation, including supplemental retirement plans (the “New Tax
Law”), the Mattel, Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated as of May 1, 1996, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of November 4, 1999 (as so amended, the “Prior SERP”) has been frozen
as of December 31, 2004. The Prior SERP benefits that were vested as of that date are not subject to the New Tax Law, and will continue to be provided under the Prior SERP, unless you accept the enhanced benefits described below and waive your
Prior SERP benefits. Benefits that were not vested as of that date will be governed by the New SERP, which is subject to and designed to comply with the New Tax Law. 
  
 The New SERP is described in the enclosed summary. A copy of the plan document for the New SERP is available, upon request. In the event of
any conflict between this letter agreement or the enclosed summary and the plan document for the New SERP, the plan document for the New SERP will control. 
  
 The New SERP has two types of benefits: Part A Benefits, which are computed using the same formula as the Prior SERP, and Part B Benefits, which are enhanced benefits for
which selected participants, including you, are eligible. In order to be eligible for a Part B Benefit, you must agree to waive your right to benefits under the Prior SERP by accepting this letter agreement as set forth below. Please note that if
you do accept this letter agreement, there is no guarantee that you will actually receive any benefits under the New SERP, as they remain subject to your compliance with the requirements of the New SERP regarding your conduct during and after
employment. 







 If you accept this letter agreement, I would appreciate it if you would sign, date and return a copy to me. 

 
 Sincerely, 
  

			
	MATTEL, INC.
		
	By:	 	/S/ ALAN KAYE
	 	 	 Alan Kaye
 SVP Human Resources


  

	
	 Agreed to and accepted by:

	
	/S/ BRYAN G. STOCKTON
	 Bryan G. Stockton
 Date: March 28,
2005
Micronutrients Process Diagram

Process is proprietary. Diagram is a best estimate

Aqueous

solution of PMN

Substance in

shipping

container.

Dicopper chloride trihydroxide for use as a

micronutrients in animal feed

Base, for example sodium hydroxide,

sodium carbonate, calcium hydroxide of

ammonium hydroxide

Storage tank

A
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2802 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

418 Liberty Street in Covington, Indiana, as the ‘‘Fountain County 

Veterans Memorial Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2013 

Mr. ROKITA (for himself, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. STUTZMAN, Mr. YOUNG

of Indiana, Mr. MESSER, Mr. BUCSHON, Mrs. WALORSKI, and Mrs. 

BROOKS of Indiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 418 Liberty Street in Covington, Indiana, 

as the ‘‘Fountain County Veterans Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FOUNTAIN COUNTY VETERANS MEMORIAL 

4 POST OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 418 Liberty Street in Covington, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2802 IH

1 Indiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Fountain 

2 County Veterans Memorial Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Fountain County Vet7 erans Memorial Post Office’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 12
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges



                   RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
                          AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS


                                                                 PERIOD ENDED
                                                              SEPTEMBER 30, 2000

                       Ratio of earnings to fixed charges           1.04x


For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
preferred stock dividends, net earnings has been added to combined fixed charges
and preferred stock dividends, and that sum has been divided by such charges.
Fixed charges consist of the estimated interest component of long-term lease
expense. In April 1998, the Company issued 260,000 shares of 8% Series B
Cumulative Preferred Stock.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,207
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     15,777
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          12,865
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            12,368
<LOANS>                                        168,044
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,509
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 237,453
<DEPOSITS>                                     159,425
<SHORT-TERM>                                    10,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             25,500
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,820
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,880
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,829
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 237,453
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,999
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,059
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,181
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,239
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,407
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,888
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,350
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      105
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,272
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,360
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,360
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,161
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     2.7
<LOANS-NON>                                         94
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   259
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,266
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,411
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        8
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,509
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,509
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27199]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Advisory Group on Electron Devices, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a 
closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Wednesday, November 29, 2000.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Eliot Cohen, AGED Secretariat, 
1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering 
(DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced 
Research Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and 
managing an effective and economical research and development program 
in the area of electron devices.
    The AGED meeting will be limited to review of research and 
development programs which the Military Department proposes to initiate 
with industry, universities or in their laboratories. The agenda for 
this meeting will include programs on Radiation Hardened Devices, 
Microwave Tubes Displays and Lasers. The review will include details of 
classified defense programs throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, 
(5 U.S.C. App. Sec. 10(d) (1994)), it had been determined that this 
Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
Sec. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly, this meeting will be 
closed to the public.

Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Defense of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-27199 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3178 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3178

To amend the National Historic Preservation Act to direct the Secretary 
    of the Interior to provide technical or financial assistance to 
    Hispanic-serving institutions for the establishment of historic 
               preservation training and degree programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2013

 Mr. Grijalva introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Historic Preservation Act to direct the Secretary 
    of the Interior to provide technical or financial assistance to 
    Hispanic-serving institutions for the establishment of historic 
               preservation training and degree programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preservation Research at 
Institutions Serving Minorities Act'' or ``PRISM Act''.

SEC. 2. HISTORIC PRESERVATION TRAINING AND DEGREE PROGRAMS FOR 
              HISPANIC-SERVING INSTITUTIONS.

    Subparagraph (C) of section 101(j)(2) of the National Historic 
Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470a(j)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' after ``tribal colleges,''; and
            (2) by inserting after ``Hawaiians,'' the following: ``and 
        to Hispanic-serving institutions as defined in section 
        502(a)(5) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
        1101a(a)(5)),''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3086 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 16, 2014 

Received 

AN ACT 

To permanently extend the Internet Tax Freedom Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3086 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent Internet 

3 Tax Freedom Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PERMANENT MORATORIUM ON INTERNET ACCESS 

5 TAXES AND MULTIPLE AND DISCRIMINATORY 

6 TAXES ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1101(a) of the Internet 

8 Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by 

9 striking ‘‘ during the period beginning November 1, 2003, 

10 and ending November 1, 2014’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxes imposed after the date 

13 of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 15, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10-V Form of Special 2006 Performance Incentive Opportunity Letter.**


     

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
      Exhibit 10-V

    


    Form
      of Special 2006 Performance Incentive Arrangement

    


    



    


    


    
      


    


    [The
      CEO
      will not participate in this arrangement] [Date]
      2006

    


    To: [Name]

    


    


    Subject: 2006
      Officer Retention Incentive Program

    


    Overview

    As
      a
      retention incentive, and to reward performance in support of the Company's
      objectives, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has approved
      a
      special retention incentive program. [Pending Compensation Committee final
      approval, you have been selected to participate in this program because of
      your
      role in leading the Company's efforts toward improved performance.]

    


    [The
      Committee has approved the target award and the performance-based objectives
      related to this program.] The award will be paid 50% in cash (paid in three
      annual installments) and 50% in restricted stock equivalents (RSEs). You will
      have the opportunity to earn the RSEs on a performance basis. Metrics for the
      RSE opportunity will be based equally on CBG PBT and CBG Quality. 

    


    There
      will be a one-year performance period after which the Compensation Committee
      of
      the Board of Directors will determine the final award. The final award RSEs
      will
      have a two-year restriction. Dividend equivalents will be credited in the form
      of additional RSEs during the restriction period, however, no dividends or
      equivalents will be paid or credited during the performance period. As soon
      as
      feasible after the end of the restriction period, the RSEs will be converted
      to
      shares of Ford Common Stock, less shares withheld to cover applicable taxes.
      

    


    The
      RSEs
      are subject to the terms and conditions of the 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
      [All other conditions that apply to the annual performance-based RSE program
      apply to this program.]

    


    Target
      Award Value

    
      	Ø  	
              Your
                total award opportunity is: [ ] 

            


    

    


    Your
      continued leadership is greatly appreciated and is essential to the Company's
      ongoing success.
Exhibit 10.43


 


	
  

  	
   

  	
  Assured Guaranty Corp.

  1325 Avenue of the Americas, 18th Floor

  New York, NY 10019

  212-974-0100

  www.assuredguaranty.com

  



 


August 19, 2004


 


 


Dear Rob:


 


As per your discussion with Dominic Frederico, your new annual salary
effective August 23, 2004 will be $275,000. 
Your annual base salary will be adjusted to $300,000 April 1, 2005.


 


In the event your employment is terminated without Cause within two (2)
years of a Change of Control of Assured Guaranty Ltd. you will receive salary
continuation at your then current salary rate for a two (2) year period.  You will continue to be eligible to
participate in any employee benefit plans in which you were participating at
the time of your termination for this same two (2) year period.  A Change of Control of Assured Guaranty Ltd.
shall be as defined in Assured Guaranty Ltd.’s Long-Term Incentive Plan.  Cause shall be defined as conviction or
admission of guilt by you of a felony involving moral turpitude or, in carrying
out your duties, you have been guilty of (i) a willful, serious and continued
failure to perform your duties, (ii)a willful and
serious misconduct or (iii) a willful and material breach of the company’s Code
of Conduct.  Provided however, any act or
failure to act shall not constitute Cause if such act
or failure to act was committed or omitted in good faith and in a manner you
reasonably believed to be in the best interest of the company.


 


All other conditions of employment apply and you should understand that
employees of AGC are employees at will and that employment at AGC is not
guaranteed for any period of time.


 


Sincerely,


 


 


Ivana M. Grillo


Vice President


Human Resources


 


	
  CC:

  	
  Dominic Frederico

  
	
   

  	
  James
  Michener

  
	
   

  	
  Robert Mills
#### NUECES COUNTY WATER IMPROVEMENT DIST. NO. 1 v. SPRING.

No. 11174.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

May 13, 1942.

William H. Shireman and David M. Coover, both of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Johns, McCampbell & Moller and Mc-Campbell & McCampbell, all of Corpus Christi, for appellee.

NORVELL, Justice.

Nueces County Water Improvement District No. One appeals from an order directing the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus commanding it to proceed forthwith to furnish water to appellee, J. E. Spring, to make proper connections with its water distribution system for such purpose, and to continue the furnishing of said water to appellee upon payment of the usual and customary charges for such service.

The controlling question involved is whether or not appellant’s refusal to furnish water upon appellee’s demand is legally justified by a contract between the water district and the City of Corpus Christi, under the terms of which the City sells water to the District, which in turn is distributed by the District for domestic use.

This contract contains provisions for the zoning as to use of territory lying outside the City, but within the District. According to the contract, the District is not to furnish water to persons making use of their property in a manner contrary to the zoning scheme or plan decided upon.

This case does not involve an attempt to regulate the use of property under the police power by means of a comprehensive zoning ordinance, and the question may be narrowed to an inquiry as to whether or not a public service corporation may refuse to deliver water to a person demanding the same because said individual has failed to comply with certain ideas or standards of property use, embodied in a contract between the public service corporation and another body corporate from which it receives its supply of water.

The fact that the contract here is between a municipality on one hand and a quasi-municipal corporation (a water district) on the other can make no difference in the legal situation, for, as above pointed out, no attempt was made to effect a zoning arrangement by an exercise of the governmental powers of the municipalities involved. The question of whether or not a water district may restrict particular uses of property within its boundaries to certain zones is not involved, nor is the power of the City to so restrict uses of property lying outside its corporate limits.

*156Appellee admittedly desires to use his property for the purpose of maintaining a dog and cat hospital. Such use is neither illegal nor violative of any rule of public policy. This being true, appellant was not justified in its refusal to deliver water to appellee. It is well settled that “a public utility corporation can not refuse to render the service which it is authorized by its charter (or by law) to furnish, because of some collateral matter not related to that service.” Annotations 55 A.L.R. 771; Allen v. Park Place Water, Light & Power Co., Tex.Civ.App., 266 S.W. 219; Ten Broek v. Miller, 240 Mich. 667, 216 N.W. 385, 55 A.L.R. 768.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.