alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3211 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to improve upon the definitions provided 

for points and fees in connection with a mortgage transaction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2013 

Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan (for himself, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. DAVID

SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. PETERS of Michigan, Mr. BACHUS, 

Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. MURPHY of Florida, and Mr. DOYLE) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to improve upon the 

definitions provided for points and fees in connection 

with a mortgage transaction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mortgage Choice Act 

5 of 2013’’. 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3211 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF POINTS AND FEES. 

2 (a) AMENDMENT TO SECTION 103 OF TILA.—Sec3 tion 103(bb)(4) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

4 1602(bb)(4)) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)(B)’’ and insert6 ing ‘‘paragraph (1)(A) and section 129C’’; 

7 (2) in subparagraph (C)— 

8 (A) by inserting ‘‘and insurance’’ after 

9 ‘‘taxes’’; 

10 (B) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘, except as 

11 retained by a creditor or its affiliate as a result 

12 of their participation in an affiliated business 

13 arrangement (as defined in section 2(7) of the 

14 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 

15 (12 U.S.C. 2602(7))’’ after ‘‘compensation’’; 

16 and 

17 (C) by striking clause (iii) and inserting 

18 the following: 

19 ‘‘(iii) the charge is— 

20 ‘‘(I) a bona fide third-party 

21 charge not retained by the mortgage 

22 originator, creditor, or an affiliate of 

23 the creditor or mortgage originator; or 

24 ‘‘(II) a charge set forth in section 

25 106(e)(1);’’; and 

26 (3) in subparagraph (D)— 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3211 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘accident,’’; and 

2 (B) by striking ‘‘or any payments’’ and in3 serting ‘‘and any payments’’. 

4 (b) AMENDMENT TO SECTION 129C OF TILA.—Sec5 tion 129C of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1639c) 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)(5)(C), by striking ‘‘103’’ 

8 and all that follows through ‘‘or mortgage origi9 nator’’ and inserting ‘‘103(bb)(4)’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (b)(2)(C)(i), by striking ‘‘103’’ 

11 and all that follows through ‘‘or mortgage origi12 nator)’’ and inserting ‘‘103(bb)(4)’’. 

13 SEC. 3. RULEMAKING. 

14 Not later than the end of the 90-day period beginning 

15 on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Bureau of 

16 Consumer Financial Protection shall issue final regula17 tions to carry out the amendments made by this Act, and 

18 such regulations shall be effective upon issuance. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<Page>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   The undersigned, Eleanor L. Thomas, President (chief executive officer) of
the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the 'Managing
Owner'), of World Monitor Trust--Series B ('Series B'), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) Series B's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
       2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
       hereof (the 'Annual Report'), fully complies with the requirements of
       Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       Series B.

/s/ Eleanor L. Thomas
------------------------------------------------------
    Eleanor L. Thomas
    President (chief executive officer) of the Managing Owner

March 28, 2003

   The undersigned, Steven Weinreb, Chief Financial Officer of the managing
owner, the Managing Owner, of Series B, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

   (1) Series B's Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       Series B.

/s/ Steven Weinreb
------------------------------------------------------
    Steven Weinreb
    Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner

March 28, 2003
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132300 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132300 COA: 272100 Oakland CC: 2004-199127-FH DUANE MONTGOMERY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 29, 2006

Clerk
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the annual report of Qiao Xing Universal Telephone, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Albert Leung, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ ALBERT LEUNGAlbert LeungChief Financial OfficerJune 30, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,112
<SECURITIES>                                    80,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  162,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     86,741
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               374,130
<PP&E>                                         295,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 919,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,033,218
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       119,706
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,233,113)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   919,811
<SALES>                                        972,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               972,024
<CGS>                                          138,455
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,387,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (457,264)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (457,264)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (457,264)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)


</TABLE>
exv10w3w1



 






EXHIBIT 10.3.1




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

1993 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN




          The Trinity Industries, Inc. 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended from
time to time (the “Plan”), is hereby amended by this Amendment No. 1, effective as of June 9,
1994, as set forth below.




          Any term which is not defined below shall have the meaning set forth for such term in the
Plan.




          1. Section 9(c) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated as follows:





     (c) If the Optionee ceases to be an officer, director, or employee of the
Company or any Affiliate by reason of the Optionee’s retirement, all rights of the
Optionee to exercise an option shall terminate, lapse, and be forfeited (i) in the
case of an Incentive Stock Option, three (3) months after the date of the
Optionee’s retirement and (ii) in the case of a Non-Qualified Stock Option,
thirty-six (36)months after the date of the Optionee’s retirement; provided
however, if the Optionee shall die during the applicable period provided under
clause (i) or (ii), the personal representatives, heirs, legatees, or distributees
of the Optionee, as appropriate, shall have the right up to twelve (12) months
from the date of death to exercise any such option to the extent that the option
was exercisable prior to death and had not been so exercised.



          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized
officer of the Company as of the day and year first above written,




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ W. Ray Wallace
Exhibit 10.8


 


SYMYX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


 


2006 CASH BONUS PLAN FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


 


The
Symyx Technologies, Inc. 2006 Cash Bonus Plan for Executive Officers
provides for an annual cash bonus target of up to 75% of an executive’s base
salary, with the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Symyx
Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) retaining authority, in its discretion,
to increase the cash bonus to a total of 100% of an executive’s base salary,
based upon the attainment by the Company of certain specified annual financial
and other performance targets as well as certain non-financial factors related
to the individual executive’s performance. The annual financial and other
targets for the program are set by the Compensation Committee and are based on
the Company’s overall financial performance, including revenue and operating
income targets and other non-financial objectives.


 


Bonus payments will be made in one annual payment
shortly after the end of each calendar year.
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

171) M-K-(C)-7 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:54 AM Sheet 171 of 325 
P.2 

II-K-(C)-7 

ENCLOSED COPY OF IFCAM DOCUMENTATION. 

Letter from E. Medine, EEA to E.C. Fox, Oak Ridge 

National Lab. 

October 3, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(C)-7
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the amended  Quarterly  Report of MDSI Mobile Data Solutions
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q/A for the  quarter  ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Verne D. Pecho, the Vice President  Finance & Administration  and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                    /s/ Verne D. Pecho
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Verne D. Pecho
                                    Vice President Finance & Administration
                                    and Chief Financial Officer
                                    March 30, 2004
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT - 32.1

                                  COMPANY NAME

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multimedia Tutorial Services, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Barry
Reichman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition, results of
                  operations, and cash flows of the Company.


/s/ Barry Reichman
--------------------------------
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
    November 18, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 209 (Friday, October 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64419]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27518]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Olympic Provincial Interagency Executive Committee (PIEC) 
Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Olympic PIEC Advisory Committee will meet on November 17, 
2000. The meeting will be held at the Olympic National Forest 
Headquarters office at 1835 Black Lake Blvd., Olympia, Washington. The 
meeting will begin at 9:00 AM and end at approximately 3:30 PM.
    Agenda topics are: (1) Welcome and introduction of new committee 
members and brief Forest update; (2) Sol Duc Adaptive Management Area 
Process; (3) Road Management Strategy Update; (4) Northwest Forest Plan 
Monitoring Report; (5) Olympic Province Advisory Committee work plan 
and goals; (6) Open forum; and (7) Public comments.
    All Olympic Province Advisory Committee Meetings are open to the 
public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Ken Eldredge, Province Liaison, USDA, Olympic National 
Forest Headquarters, 1835 Black Lake Blvd., Olympia, WA 98512-5623, 
(360) 956-2323 or Dale Hom, Forest Supervisor, at (360) 956-2301.

    Dated: October 17, 2000.
Kenneth C. Eldredge,
Acting Forest Supervisor, Olympic National Forest.
[FR Doc. 00-27518 Filed 10-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1069 

TP 13-01806 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF WILLIE JAMES, PETITIONER, 

V ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY 

SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT. 

 

WILLIE JAMES, PETITIONER PRO SE. 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (PETER H. SCHIFF OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial

Department by order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County [Thomas G.

Leone, A.J.], entered September 27, 2013) to review a determination of

respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that

petitioner had violated an inmate rule. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously

confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. 

Entered: November 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
September 14, 2010 Angel Gonzalez, General Manager
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129489 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

CAROLYN SPILLER, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129489 

 COA: 253502 

WCAC: 03-000051 

UNITED AIRLINES, INC., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 9, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 27, 2006 

Clerk
#### ROYAL v. STATE.

No. 25150.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 21, 1951.

W. P. Spillman, Wellington, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Driving while intoxicated upon a public highway is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $50.

The state, in the information, elected to describe the highway upon which the ap*619pellant was alleged to have driven the automobile as being “Highway 82 South of Wellington, Texas.”

We have searched this record in vain for any testimony supporting this allegation.

Because of the failure to sustain this allegation, the testimony is insufficient to support the conviction. Hadley v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 27, 205 S.W.2d 374; Stasney v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 563, 208 S.W.2d 894.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved ¡by the court
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Gregory Thomas, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 905 C.D. 2018

:

C/O Jason Pyle, :

C/O James Mainello, :

Captain B. Harris, :

HEX. S. Ellenberger, :

Unit Manager M. Goss, :

D. Supt. J. Thomas, :

Acting Deputy Supt. S. Walters, :

K. Kauffman Supt., :

C. HEX Joseph H. Dupont, :

S ued in Their Individual and :

Official Capacity :

O R D E R

NOW, January 8, 2019

, having considered appellant’s application for

re consideration , the application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

P resident Judge
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-10270

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AKOHOMEN IGHEDOISE, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00320-SDM-MRM-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 23-10270 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 01/29/2024 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 23-10270

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Akohomen 

Ighedoise in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw 

from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief 

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our 

independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment 

of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent 

examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ighedoise’s

conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.1

1 Ighedoise’s motions for appointment of counsel and to proceed in forma 

pauperis are DENIED.

USCA11 Case: 23-10270 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 01/29/2024 Page: 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                               
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4


                           MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.


                                  Amendment
                                    to the
                            1996 Stock Option Plan



         By vote of the Board of Directors of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. at its
meeting held January 27, 1999, the Midwest Banc Holdings 1996 Stock Option 
Plan is hereby amended by adding a new Section  6.4(d) to read in its entirety 
as follows:

         "(d)     In the case of Options awarded to Employees in lieu of annual
                  cash incentive payments approved by the Board of Directors,
                  the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall provide in each
                  Award Agreement when each Option expires and becomes
                  unexercisable, notwithstanding the limits of Section 6.4(a)
                  and (b) above. In the event the Award Agreement does not set
                  forth such provisions, then the Option evidenced thereby shall
                  expire and become unexercisable in accordance with the
                  provisions of Section 6.4(a) and (b) above."
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,307-01

EX PARTE JERMEY ALGONON WILLIAMS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1419256 IN THE 183RD DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to possession of a

controlled substance, and was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his

conviction. 

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because the substance he possessed was

tested after his plea and found not to contain MDMA, the controlled substance Applicant pleaded

guilty to possessing. Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte Mable, 2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS

974 (Tex. Crim. App. Sept. 17, 2014). Applicant cannot be said to have entered his plea knowingly
and intelligently while operating under a misunderstanding regarding the facts and relevant

circumstances of the case. Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 1419256 in the 183rd 

District Court of Harris County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff

of Harris County to answer the charges against him. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench

warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: November 19, 2014

Do not publish