alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LOGO KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



Suite 2800
Two First Union Center
Charlotte. NC 28282-8290


                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT

The Board of Directors
First Union Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about First Union Mortgage Corporation's
(a  wholly-owned  subsidiary  of First Union  Corporation)  compliance  with the
minimum servicing  standards  identified in the Mortgage Bankers  Association of
America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS (USAP) as of
and  for  the  year  ended  December  3l,  1997  included  in the  accompanying
management  assertion.  Management  is  responsible  for  First  Union  Mortgage
Corporation's   compliance   with  those  minimum   servicing   standards.   Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion on  management's  assertion about First
Union Mortgage Corporation's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about First Union Mortgage  Corporation's
compliance  with the  minimum  servicing  standards  and  performing  such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our
examination  provides a reasonable  basis for our opinion.  Our examination does
not  provide  a  legal  determination  on  First  Union  Mortgage  Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion,  management's  assertion that First Union  Mortgage  Corporation
complied with the aforementioned  minimum servicing  standards as of and for the
year ended December 31, 1997 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
March 13, I998



LOGO MEMEBERS FIRM OF KPMB INTERNATIONAL
STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER-SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                     FOR PERIOD ENDED
                                                                                    SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
                                                                                    ------------------
<S>                                                                                          <C>

     Net earnings available to common ..........................................        $ 5,912,000
                                                                                        ===========


     Average shares outstanding ................................................         12,261,397
Basic net earnings per-share ...................................................             $ 0.48
                                                                                        ===========


     Average shares outstanding ................................................         12,261,397
     Stock options incremental shares ..........................................                791
                                                                                         ----------

          Average shares outstanding, diluted ..................................         12,262,188

Diluted net earnings per-share .................................................             $ 0.48
                                                                                         ==========


Diluted net earnings per-share assuming conversion of preferred stock:
     Net earnings available to common ..........................................        $ 5,912,000
     Preferred stock dividends for the period ..................................        $   208,000
                                                                                        -----------

     Net earnings before preferred stock dividends .............................        $ 6,120,000
                                                                                        ===========

     Average shares outstanding ................................................         12,261,397
     Assumed conversion of preferred stock .....................................            260,000
     Stock options incremental shares ..........................................                791
                                                                                        -----------

     Total .....................................................................         12,522,188
                                                                                        ===========

     Per-share amount (anti-dilutive) ..........................................        $      0.49
                                                                                        ===========

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          19,611
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,956
<PP&E>                                          27,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                     157
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,341
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,600
<COMMON>                                         1,226
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,861
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,992
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,127
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,882
<INCOME-TAX>                                       927
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,851
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
(LOGO)
                                                             HUNTINGTON MORTGAGE
                                                             COMPANY

                                             The Huntington Mortgage Company
                                             7575 Huntington Park Drive
                                             Columbus, Ohio 43235

March 26, 1998

SASCOR
Attn: Master Servicing Dept
7435 New Technology Way
Frederick, MD 21701

Re: 1997 Annual Reporting

Dear Investor:

In accordance with the servicing agreement between The Huntington Mortgage
Company (HMC) and your firm, this letter will serve as our annual certification
relative to the  portfolio  of  mortgage  loans  administered  on your  behalf.
Enclosed, please find The Huntington BancShares Incorporated and HMC Annual
Reports for 1997.

This letter will also certify that all real estate taxes and insurance premiums
have been paid in  connection  with the mortgage loan  portfolio.  Additionally,
please find Fidelity Bond certificates as well as Errors Omissions declarations
to further protect your interest.

The employees of The Huntington are pleased to be of service to you and we look
forward to continuing the valued business  relationship that we have established
with your  organization.  Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed
statements, please contact me directly at (614)480-6680.

Sincerely,
/s/Bradford C. Northcraft
Bradford C. Northcraft
Vice President
Investor Services Manager


     Take control of your money.
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: March 30, 2007 /s/ Jerry D. Chase   Jerry D. Chase        Chief Executive Officer   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not beingfiled as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
1

Werner, Christopher

From: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 2:44 PM

To: Werner, Christopher; Lorang, Phil; Beaver, Melinda

Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563: EPA NPRM -- 

Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirements for State Plans (RIN 2060-AS55)

Attachments: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866_13563_EPA OAR RHR NPRM.DOCX

Categories: Regional Haze

Attached please find additional summary of interagency comments under EO 12866 and 13563 for the draft proposed 

rule entitled, Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirements for State Plans (RIN 2060-AS55). The interagency 

comments are in response to the last RLSO version submitted to OMB for review. I accepted all changes from that 

version and the interagency comments within this version are new. 

 

Thank you and please let me know if you have any comments or questions. 

 

Aaron L. Szabo 

Policy Analyst 

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

Office of Management and Budget 

202-395-3621 

Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         120,152
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         186,166
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,139,073
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,816,176
<ALLOWANCE>                                     18,050
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,543,876
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,729,194
<SHORT-TERM>                                   267,340
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            244,122
<LONG-TERM>                                     73,254
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,885
<OTHER-SE>                                     210,081
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,543,876
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 34,039
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               17,831
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,637
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                53,507
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              24,528
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,499
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           23,008
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      150
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 72,634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,406
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      13,057
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,057
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.14
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,484
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                17,629
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      122
<RECOVERIES>                                       393
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               18,050
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            18,050
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         18,050
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3263 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3263

   Eliminating the debt ceiling for a period defined, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 2013

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   Eliminating the debt ceiling for a period defined, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fiscal Sanity Act for the National 
Debt''.

SEC. 2. NONAPPLICABILITY OF DEBT CEILING.

    Section 3101(b) of title 31, United States Code, shall not apply 
for the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and 
ending 150 days thereafter.
            
                                 <all>
```
#### Hannah Jaffe, Plaintiff, *v.*Louis Jaffe, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

November 8, 1957.

*666
      *Philip Olan*for plaintiff.

*George Jacobs*for defendant.

Benjamin Brenner, J.

The defendant husband, claiming nonresidence, appears specially and requests a commission to have his testimony taken upon written interrogatories in connection with a hearing scheduled before the Official Referee to determine defendant’s true domicile. The plaintiff wife prefers that the defendant appear and testify before the Referee since he resides nearby in New Jersey, agreeing to withhold service of any process on the defendant during his appearance for the purpose. Neither party asks for an open commission and if defendant’s application is to be granted there is no question as to plaintiff’s right to submit cross-interrogatories. In view of plaintiff’s offer to withhold process, the court expressed the thought upon the hearing of the motion that defendant’s claimed residence so close to this forum would seem to render the commission unnecessary. Defendant, however, argued that rule 126 of the Rules of Civil Practice automatically grants the right to the commission and implied that the court has no discretion in the matter. I do not agree. It seems to me that where the circumstances do not involve any jeopardy or inconvenience to a party claiming nonresidence, his testimony, subject to cross-examination in open court, is more likely to produce reliable evidence on the question of Ms true domicile than will Ms examination upon interrogatories. If there be discretion to deny an examination on written interrogatories where circumstances demand an open commission, affording an opportunity for oral cross-examination *(Bennett*v. *Kelly,*283 App. Div. 945; *Beder*v. *Beder,*260 App. Div. 1026), why may not the court exercise discretion to deny the commission as wholly unnecessary where attendance at the hearing is quite convenient and does not involve jeopardy? Oral testimony is always favored because it is less likely to be perjurious than is testimony given upon written interrogatories *(Bator*v. *Hungarian Commercial*
      *667
      *Bank,*194 Misc. 232, mod. 196 Misc. 157). It occurs to me that an alleged nonresident, appearing specially, seeldng the favor of this court for an opportunity, to safely present evidence of nonresidence, is in no position to challenge the court’s discretion as to the manner in which that request is given effect if he is saved harmless while supplying such evidence. In the circumstances, the motion herein is denied upon condition that plaintiff stipulate to be stayed from service of any and all process upon the defendant while present in this jurisdiction in connection with such hearing.

Settle order on notice.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3269 

Eliminating the debt ceiling for a period defined, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 5, 2013 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

Eliminating the debt ceiling for a period defined, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal Sanity Act for 

5 the National Debt’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NONAPPLICABILITY OF DEBT CEILING. 

7 Section 3101(b) of title 31, United States Code, shall 

8 not apply for the period beginning on the date of the en9 actment of this Act and ending 330 days thereafter. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Ex parte CLINE.

No. 23368.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 6, 1946.

James H. Martin and Newton Kennedy, both of Dallas, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty.,‘ of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.'

Relator was held under an indictment charging the > murder of Clyde Freddie Mears, and at a hearing of his writ of habeas corpus he was refused fail by the district judge.

The State showed a killing by one identified as appellant of a man endeavoring to apprehend appellant who was at such time engaged in tampering with an automobile which had been entered by means of prizing open a window thereof, this intruder being within such car and evidently rifling same. While in pursuit of the person thus found in such car, Mr. Mears was stabbed ■and died in about seven or eight minutes.

Relator offered no testimony at the hearing.

We are constrained to concur in the judgment of the trial court that the proof shown herein is evident, and the judgment refusing bail is affirmed.
Exhibit 21.1



AXEDA SYSTEMS INC.

SUBSIDIARIES



United States Corporations, wholly owned
subsidiaries of Axeda Systems Inc.:



|1. | RAVISENT IP, Inc.: a Nevada Corporation
|-- | ---------------------------------------



|2. | RAVISENT Operating Company Inc.: a Delaware Corporation
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Liuco, Inc.: a Delaware Corporation
|-- | -----------------------------------



|4. | RAVISENT Technologies Internet Appliance Group, Inc.: a Delaware Corporation
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



Israeli Entity:



|5. | Axeda Systems Ltd.: an Israeli corporation, wholly owned by Axeda Systems Inc.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Wholly owned subsidiaries of Axeda Systems Ltd.:



|6. | Axeda Systems Operating Company, Inc.: U.S. company incorporated in Massachusetts
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|7. | eMation R&D, Inc.: U.S. company incorporated in Massachusetts
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------



|8. | Axeda Systems S.A.S.: a French corporation
|-- | ------------------------------------------



|9. | Axeda Systems B.V.: a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|10. | Axeda Systems Limited: a UK corporation
|--- | ---------------------------------------



|11. | Axeda Systems KK: a Japanese corporation
|--- | ----------------------------------------



German Entities:



|12. | Viona Vervatungs GmbH: wholly owned subsidiary of Axeda Systems Inc.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------



|13. | Axeda Systems GmbH: wholly owned subsidiary of Axeda Systems Inc.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------



Canadian Entities:



|14. | RAVISENT Nova Scotia: an unlimited liability Nova Scotia company wholly owned by Axeda Systems Inc.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|15. | RAVISENT British Columbia: a corporation organized under the laws of British Columbia wholly owned by RAVISENT Nova Scotia
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3180 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to include contracts and grants 

for residential care for veterans in the exception to the requirement 

that the Federal Government recover a portion of the value of certain 

projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 

Ms. KAPTUR (for herself, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, and Mr. PETERS of Michigan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to include contracts 

and grants for residential care for veterans in the exception to the requirement that the Federal Government 

recover a portion of the value of certain projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3180 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF CONTRACTS AND GRANTS FOR 

2 RESIDENTIAL CARE FOR VETERANS IN EX3 CEPTION TO CERTAIN RECAPTURE REQUIRE4 MENTS. 

5 Section 8136(b) of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended by inserting ‘‘, or the provision by the Secretary 

7 of a contract or grant for residential care for veterans,’’ 

8 after ‘‘outpatient clinic’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS