alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### People v Xi Hui Wu 2024 NY Slip Op 30601(U) February 26, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 452904/2022 Judge: Margaret A. Chan Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip

Op30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New

York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 1 of 22 

## [* 1]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 2 of 22 

## [* 2]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 3 of 22 

## [* 3]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 4 of 22 

## [* 4]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 5 of 22 

## [* 5]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 6 of 22 

## [* 6]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 7 of 22 

## [* 7]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 8 of 22 

## [* 8]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 9 of 22 

## [* 9]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 10 of 22 

## [* 10]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 11 of 22 

## [* 11]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 12 of 22 

## [* 12]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 13 of 22 

## [* 13]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 14 of 22 

## [* 14]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 15 of 22 

## [* 15]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 16 of 22 

## [* 16]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 17 of 22 

## [* 17]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 18 of 22 

## [* 18]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 19 of 22 

## [* 19]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 20 of 22 

## [* 20]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 21 of 22 

## [* 21]INDEX NO. 452904/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2024 22 of 22 

## [* 22]
EXHIBIT 31.A
CERTIFICATION
I, Stephen C. Beasley, certify that:
1. I havereviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tennessee GasPipeline Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis Report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this Reportis being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this Report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisReport based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 11, 2005         /s/ Stephen C. Beasley   Stephen C. Beasley   President
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Willis, Fitzpatrick and Overton Argued at Salem, Virginia

ROGER DALE SNODY

v. Record No. 1104-95-3 MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY JUDGE JERE M. H. WILLIS, JR. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA APRIL 23, 1996

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF MARTINSVILLE David V. Williams, Judge Wayne T. Baucino (Office of the Public Defender, on brief), for appellant. Monica S. McElyea, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General; Thomas C. Daniel, Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

On appeal from a felony conviction for driving after having been declared an habitual offender in violation of Code § 46.2-357(B)(2), Roger Dale Snody contends that the evidence supports only a conviction for a misdemeanor under Code § 46.2-357(B)(1). We agree and reverse the felony sentence and remand the case for a misdemeanor conviction and resentencing. On October 8, 1994, Officer Ross "heard a car with its engine racing and then heard tires break traction for several seconds." At the time, Ross was outside his car. He walked around his car for a better view and "saw a cloud of tire smoke" and a Monte Carlo with its brake lights on at the intersection of

Moss and Market Streets.

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - Officer Ross pursued the car and pulled it over. Snody was driving and a passenger occupied the front seat. Ross discovered that Snody had been adjudicated an habitual offender. Ross testified that Snody told him that he had spun his tires to get away from some trouble on Moss Street. Ross testified that he saw no other vehicles on the street, that Snody did not deviate from his lane of traffic, and that he did not come close to hitting any other car, or property, or person. At trial, Snody moved to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor on the ground that his driving did not endanger the life, limb, or property of another. The trial court denied this motion and found that Snody's driving endangered his passenger. The trial court convicted Snody of violating Code § 46.2-357(B)(2) and imposed a felony sentence. "The distinction between negligent driving and reckless driving is the critical element in determining punishment under Code § 46.2-357." Bishop v. Commonwealth , 20 Va. App. 206, 210-11, 455 S.E.2d 765, 767 (1995). Code § 46.2-357(B)(2) states in pertinent part: If such driving, of itself, does endanger the life, limb, or property of another, such person shall be guilty of a felony . . . .

The evidence fails to prove that Snody's driving endangered the life, limb, or property of another. Mere rapid acceleration, with a spinning of wheels, over a short course that involved no other vehicle or property and proposed no hazard of accident, did- 3 - not actually create such a danger. Thus, the evidence does not support the imposition of a felony sentence. The evidence does, however, prove beyond a reasonable doubt the elements of Code § 46.2-357(B)(1). We remand this case to the trial court for conviction of a misdemeanor and appropriate sentencing.

Reversed and remanded.
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-14-00904-CV

Gramercy Advisor LLC, Gramercy Asset Management LLC, Gramercy Local Markets Recovery 

Fund LLC and Gramercy Financial Services LLC 

v.

R. K. Lowery, Jr. L-Falling Creek LLC, Russell A. Chabaud, R-Rac Wimbledon, LLC, John P. 

Moffitt, J-Jason LLC, Russell A. Chabaud, Trustee of the Russell G. Chabaud 1999 Investment 

Trust, R- Russell Wimbledon, LLC, et al

NO. 2008-74262 IN THE 80TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

SUPP CLK RECORD

MT FEE

SUPP CLK RECORD

SUPP CLK RECORD

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

CLK RECORD

RPT RECORD

FILING

$26.00

$10.00

$17.00

$8.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$3,796.00

$280.00

$175.00

04/20/2015

03/05/2015

02/11/2015

02/06/2015

01/28/2015

01/28/2015

01/15/2015

01/07/2015

01/07/2015

12/29/2014

12/29/2014

12/29/2014

12/29/2014

12/08/2014

12/02/2014

11/12/2014

11/10/2014

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

UNKNOWN

E-PAID

APE

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT
STATEWIDE EFILING $20.00 11/10/2014 E-PAID ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$4,432.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this September 11, 2015.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Brian J. Martin,
President (chief executive officer) of the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor TrustSeries A (Series A), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series As Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and | 
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series A. | 
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 



|                        |  |                                                                         
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    March 29, 2004 |  | /s/ Brian J. Martin                                                     
|                        |  |                                                                         
|                        |  | Brian J. Martin President (chief executive officer)of the Managing Owner
**Exhibit 32(ii)**

****

**CERTIFICATION**

******PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350**



In connect
with the quarterly report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended August 31, 2007 to be filed with Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark V. McDonough,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods covered by the Report.

It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

|Date: October 11, 2007 | By: | /s/ Mark V. McDonough                     
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                       |     | Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial
Officer
**Exhibit 32(ii)**

****

**CERTIFICATION**

******PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connect with the quarterly
report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended August 31, 2004 to be filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.





|Date: October 13, 2004 | By: | /s/ Mark V. McDonough                     
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                       |     | Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial Officer
CLD-126 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 19-1263

___________

IN RE: FREDERICK H. BANKS,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(Related to W.D. Pa. Crim. No. 2-15-cr-00168-001)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

March 7, 2019

Before: CHAGARES, RESTREPO, and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: April 5, 2019)

_________

OPINION*

_________

PER CURIAM

Frederick Banks is currently awaiting trial in the United States District Court for 

the Western District of Pennsylvania on charges of interstate stalking, 18 U.S.C. 

§ 2261(a)(2), aggravated identity theft, § 1028A(a)(1), making false statements, 

§ 1001(a)(3), and wire fraud, § 1343. 

On January 21, 2019, Banks filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in this Court.

 * This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.
2

Banks states that in December 2018, he filed a motion in the District Court seeking 

reimbursement for expenses incurred in the criminal action, including postage, envelopes, 

paper, and pens. The District Court denied his request. Banks now asks us to order the 

District Judge to “perform his clear legal duty and enter an order granting [his] motion 

for reimbursement.”

We will deny Banks’s petition. Mandamus is a drastic remedy available in only 

extraordinary circumstances, and may not be used as a substitute for an appeal. In re Diet 

Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig., 418 F.3d 372, 378-79 (3d Cir. 2005). Because the District 

Court’s order was reviewable on appeal, mandamus relief is not appropriate.1 See In re 

Kensington Int’l Ltd., 353 F.3d 211, 219 (3d Cir. 2003) (“If, in effect, an appeal will lie, 

mandamus will not.”). 

 1 We express no opinion on whether, should Banks seek appellate review, his appeal 

would be timely or otherwise within our jurisdiction, or whether the appeal would have 

merit.
EXHIBIT X 

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-16 Filed 11/14/22 Page 1 of 10
Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-16 Filed 11/14/22 Page 2 of 10
GUERRA 000109

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-16 Filed 11/14/22 Page 3 of 10
GUERRA 000110

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-16 Filed 11/14/22 Page 4 of 10
GUERRA 000111

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-16 Filed 11/14/22 Page 5 of 10
GUERRA 000112

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-16 Filed 11/14/22 Page 6 of 10
GUERRA 000113

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-16 Filed 11/14/22 Page 7 of 10
GUERRA 000114

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-16 Filed 11/14/22 Page 8 of 10
GUERRA 000115

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-16 Filed 11/14/22 Page 9 of 10
GUERRA 000116

Case 5:20-cv-00746-JKP Document 119-16 Filed 11/14/22 Page 10 of 10
AMEND NUMBER 2 TO THE 1998 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN



 







Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 TO THE ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.

1998 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




          This Amendment Number 2 to the Astec Industries, Inc. 1998 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is made and entered into this 21st day of February 2006, by
Astec Industries, Inc. (the “Company”).




          Pursuant to a resolution of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company, in accordance with Section 11 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:





	 	1.	 	By deleting Section 4 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
	 
	 	 	 	“4. Shares Subject to Plan. Stock Awards granted under Section 6 of the Plan
(including deferred rights to receive Stock) shall not exceed in the aggregate 200,000
Shares of Common Stock. Such Shares may be authorized and unissued Shares or treasury
Shares. Options granted to a Participant pursuant to Section 7 of this Plan from and after
August 1, 2004 shall be granted under the Astec Industries, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive
Plan, or any subsequent equity incentive plan approved by the Company’s shareholders for
the grant of options to its employees and directors (the “Approved Incentive Plan”). The
terms contained in the Approved Incentive Plan are incorporated into and made a part of
this Plan with respect to such Options and such Options shall be governed by and construed
in accordance with the Approved Incentive Plan. In the event of any actual or alleged
conflict between the provisions of the Approved Incentive Plan and the provisions of this
Plan, the provisions of the Approved Incentive Plan shall be controlling and determinative
with respect to Options granted to a Participant pursuant to Section 7 hereof from and
after August 1, 2004. This Plan does not constitute a separate source of shares for the
grant of the Options from and after August 1, 2004.”
	 
	 	2.	 	Except as specifically set forth herein, the terms of the Plan shall remain in full
force and effect as prior to this amendment.





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly
authorized officer as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Albert E. Guth
 	 
	 	 	Albert E. Guth 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Group Vice President — Administration
and Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2733]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of Citizen Advocacy Panel, South Florida District

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A public meeting of the South Florida District Citizen 
Advocacy Panel will be held in Fort Myers, Florida.

DATES: The meeting will be held Saturday, February 26, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Ferree at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-
423-7974.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a Public meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held 
Saturday, February 26, 2000, 9:00 a.m. to Noon at the Edison Community 
College, Learning Resource Building, J-103 Corbin Auditorium, 8099 
College Parkway SW, Fort Myers, FL 33919.
    For more information contact Nancy Ferree at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-
423-7974. The public is invited to make oral comments. Individual 
comments will be limited to 10 minutes. If you would like to have the 
CAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-
423-7974, or write Nancy Ferree, CAP Office, 7771 W. Oakland Park Blvd 
#225, Sunrise, FL 33351. The Agenda will include the following: various 
IRS issues.


    Note: Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could 
prevent effective advance notice.


    Dated: January 29, 2000.
John J. Mannion,
Program Manager, Taxpayer Advocate Service.
[FR Doc. 00-2733 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of IQ Biometrix, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
IQB.


September 30, 2004                                    /s/ Michael Walsh
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Michael Walsh
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.38



 Exhibit 10.38 
 Dominion Resources, Inc. 
 Non-Employee Directors’ Annual Compensation 
 As of December 31, 2005 
  

			
	 Annual Retainer
	  	 Amount

	 Service as Director
	  	$55,000 ($20,000 cash; $35,000 stock)
	 Service as Audit Committee Chair
	  	$12,500
	 Service as a Committee Chair (other than Audit)
	  	$ 5,000
		
	 Meeting Fees
	  	 
	 Board meetings
	  	$2,000 per meeting
	 Audit and Organization, Compensation and Nominating (OCN) Committee meetings
	  	$2,000 per meeting
	 All other Committee meetings
	  	$1,500 per meeting