alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



MERIDIAN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.FORM 10-Q

EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Meridian Medical Technologies,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James H. Miller, as Chairman
of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                        
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by
the Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason
other than as specifically required by law.

|                  |  |                                 
|----------------- |  | --------------------------------
|December 16, 2002 |  | /s/ James H. Miller             
|                  |  | James H. Miller                 
|                  |  | Chairman of the Board, President
|                  |  | and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust III and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended December 26, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Thomas W. Perry, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of Merrill Lynch
& Co., Inc., the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

    (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Partnership.

                       MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING III, L.P.

                       By:     MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                       By:     /s/ THOMAS W. PERRY
                              -----------------------------------------
                           Name:   Thomas W. Perry*
                           Title:  Chief Accounting Officer and Controller



Dated: March 26, 2009
-----------------------
* Thomas W. Perry functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
#### REED et al. v. YONKER.

No. 12214.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Feb. 7, 1951.

Rehearing Denied March 7, 1951.

*361Coleman Gay, James H. Rogers, Austin, for appellants.

Lloyd & Lloyd, Alice, for appellee.

NORVELL, Justice.

This- is an exception 4 venue case, Article 1995, § 4, Vernon’s Stats. The controlling authority is Stockyards National Bank v. Maples, 127 Tex. 633, 95 S.W.2d 1300. The resident defendant was John R. Pedigo. The non-resident defendants were Hiram M. Reed and Ruth Reed Hall, independent executors of the estate of D. C. Reed, deceased, residents of Travis 'County, Texas. The petition alleged joint causes of action against Pedi-go and the D. C. Reed estate. The ques-tion on this appeal relates to the sufficiency of the proof of a cause of actibn against Pedigo, the resident defendant. The trial judge held that a cause of action against said defendant had been made out and that the cause should be tried in Jim Wells County where the suit was'filed. All conflicts in the testimony must be resolved in favor of the order overruling the plea of privilege and the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below. When this is done, it is clear that the order of the court below should not be disturbed.

The plaintiff, Tom Yonker, and the defendant John R. Pedigo were the only persons who testified. • It is undisputed that a .business was carried on in Jim Wells County,under the name of “Reed and Pedigo.” It is likewise undisputed that the accounts sued upon arose out-of agreements had between Yonker and Pedigo-. When a party secures services or equipment from another, it may be reasonably inferred that he intends to pay for the same unless it is made clear that he is acting in a representative capacity on behalf of some other person. Yonker testified that he furnished services and equipment to “Reed and Pedigo” upon orders of, Pedigo. Yonker’s testimony, which was credited by the trial judge, made out a case against the resident defendant.

Pedigo testified that he was acting for “Reed and Pedigo” in securing services and materials from Yonker, but that he was a mere agent or manager for D: C. Reed, who was in effect doing business under the firm name of “Reed and Pedigo.” This evidence, if credited, would relieve Pedigo of all liability and render the D. C. Reed estate alone liable for the obligations sued upon. Pedigo’s testimony upon this point was wholly uncorroborated.1 He was an interested party and his credibility was for the trial judge as the trier of facts.

We hold that the court below could reasonably conclude from the evidence that Yonker had sustained the burden of proving a cause of action against Pedigo,-the resident defendant, and the order appealed from is accordingly, affirmed.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3288 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to exempt expenditures or obligations 

of funds derived from user fees from certain limitations under the 

Antideficiency Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 11, 2013 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself, Mr. FLEMING, and Mr. SCALISE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to exempt expenditures or obligations of funds derived from user fees from 

certain limitations under the Antideficiency Act, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiduciary Responsi5 bility and Fairness Act of 2013’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3288 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FOR EXPENDITURES OR OBLIGATIONS 

2 OF FUNDS DERIVED FROM USER FEES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1341(a) of title 31, 

4 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(3) This subsection does not apply in the case 

7 of any expenditure or obligation of funds derived 

8 from user fees and authorized to be appropriated for 

9 such purpose.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to expenditures and 

12 obligations made or authorized after the date of the enact13 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### SHANNON v. STATE.

No. 23554.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 22, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated. The penalty assessed is a fine of $50.

The complaint and information, as well as all other matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question is pre-sented for review.

The judg-ment of the trial coyrt is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**MAURICE HARPER,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 98 EM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 6th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal** Nunc Pro Tunc **is** DENIED

**.**
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Brian R. Ervine, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Evolving Systems, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 24, 2006

/s/
Brian R. Ervine
Brian R. Ervine
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

### Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

### As Adopted Pursuant to

### Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

---

In connection with the
quarterly report of Pathmark  Stores, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended May 1, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Eileen R. Scott, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in  all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this
written statement required by  Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the  signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written  statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained  by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon  request.

| |                      | /s/ Eileen R. Scott                                
| | -------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Name:    Title:Date: | Eileen R. ScottChief Executive Officer
June 7, 2004
Exhibit 10.9


Translation of a letter
dated April 8, 2004 and written by Prof. Dr. Bernhard Scheuble,


Chairman of the
Executive Board, Merck KGaA

To Walter W. Zywottek, 1180 Winderly Lane, Newtown Square, PA 19073, USA


Dear
Mr. Zywottek,


Following
the successful closing of the VWR transaction, I would like to use the
opportunity to summarize and conclude our discussion held during the month of
February and March regarding contractual definitions of the pension
commitments.  I’m referring also to your letter dated January 23, 2004 and
will address the content as follows.


There
is agreement that the return guarantee, as defined in our letter February 27,
2001 will be eliminated, effective closing of the sale of VWR, recognizing that
the sale of VWR eliminates the base for the potential utilization of this
guarantee.  Just for clarification, we would like to express the fact that
there are no further (employment) contractual obligations between you and us.


At the
same time we would like to express our sincere appreciation for your
extraordinary achievements during your tenure with Merck.  In recognition
of your efforts and in appreciation for the successfully concluded VWR
transaction we will pay you a special bonus.  The amount will be
communicated in a separate letter.


Regarding
your retirement conditions we offer, again in recognition of your achievements
and in order to have clarity of the terms of our Pension Agreement entered into
April l, 1992 that we will


a)             
Not consider, when
calculating the company pension, the usual deduction of the employer
contribution related to the pension resulting from the contributions to the “Pensionskasse
der Chemischen Industrie”


b)            
Also not consider the
EMD Chemicals 401-k plan when calculating your pension,


c)             
Forfeit any
consideration of severance payments you might receive from VWR International
and/or third parties.


If you
would decide to retire before reaching the regular retirement age, we
specifically express that we will be waiving all deductions
(versicherungsmathematischen Abschlaege) normally effective when retiring
before 63 years of age.


Dear
Mr. Zywottek, these are very special circumstances to say farewell to a
manager.  In your 37 years of successful work in many different functions
in the Merck group you contributed in an extraordinary manner and earned the
highest degree of respect.  Let me assure you, that our recognition of
your efforts and achievements will remain also under


1

















the new
ownership structure of VWR.  We anticipate that with your help and under
your leadership the future cooperation between VWR and Merck will be a
long-term successful and profitable partnership.


The
Executive Board of Merck KGaA is again expressing their appreciation for your
successful cooperation over a long period of time and wishes you in your new
professional environment a good start and a lot of success.


With
best regards,


Signed Bernhard Scheuble


 


2
#### SCHUMANN v. STATE.

No. 25273.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 18, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the driving while intoxicated upon a public road; the punishment, a fine of $50.00.

The record before us contains neither bills of exception nor a statement of facts. Nothing is presented for consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Continuity Agreement - Kevin P. Madden


    
      

      

    

     

    EXHIBIT
      10.6

    


    


    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

    To: Kevin
      P.
      Madden

    


    From: D.
      Raymond Riddle

     

    
      Re: 
        Notice
        Regarding and Amendment to Your Continuity Agreement Dated December 1,
        2003

    

    


    Date: February
      24, 2006

    


    Pursuant
      to Section 2.1 of the Continuity Agreement among you, AGL Resources Inc. (the
      “Company”) and AGL Services Company, dated December 1, 2003 (the “Agreement”)
      this notice is being furnished to inform you that the Agreement will not be
      extended beyond the last date of its now current Term, November 30, 2007.


    


    In
      addition, pursuant to Section 7.6 of the Agreement, and in consideration of
      ten
      dollars ($10.00) to be paid to you and other good and valuable consideration,
      the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Sections 1.16(a)
      and 1.16(b) of the Agreement are hereby amended in their entirety to read as
      follows:

    


    	(a)  	
            any
              material diminution in the Executive’s position, duties or
              responsibilities with the Company or one of its subsidiaries or any
              change
              that would constitute a material adverse alteration in the Executive’s
              duties, responsibilities or other conditions of employment, from those
              in
              effect as of the earliest of the date of the Announcement, the date
              of a
              Change in Control or the date of the Consummation of a Change in Control
              Transaction; provided, that, for this purpose, it shall be a material
              diminution of Executive’s position if the Executive does not report
              directly to the Company’s Chief Executive
              Officer;

          


    


    	(b)  	
            any
              adverse change in the Executive's rate of annual base salary or annual
              incentive compensation opportunity (i.e., annual cash bonus opportunity
              under the Annual Incentive Plan or a successor plan) from the rate
              of
              annual base salary and annual incentive compensation opportunity in
              effect
              as of the earliest of the date of the Announcement, the date of a Change
              in Control or the date of the Consummation of a Change in Control
              Transaction;

          


    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive have executed this Amendment and
      Notice to be effective as of the date and year first written above.

    


    COMPANY:

    


    AGL
      RESOURCES, INC.


    


    By:
       /s/
      D.
      Raymond Riddle   

    Title:
      Interim Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

    


    EXECUTIVE:


    


    /s/
      Kevin P. Madden    

    SIGNATURE
      

    


    


    [THIS
      DOCUMENT HAS BEEN EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE.]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 22, 2014

t0819 

# Order

Clerk August 22, 2014

149672

SC: 149672

In re ARCE/L OGAN, Minors

. COA: 318471

Jackson CC Family Division:

12

- 001239

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### clean and compare RTR package Ken Hustvedt to: Cortney

_ Higgins, nbeck 09/14/2010 06:48 PM

Cc: Ann Johnson, Dave Guinnup, Dave Salman, Elaine Manning, Fred Talcott, George Woodall, Jan Tierney, Mark Morris, Mary Kissell, Paula Hirtz, Phil Mulrine, Randy Mcdonald, Rick Vetter, Sarah Mazur, Stan Durkee, Steve Shedd, Ted Palma, Tim Benner, Wendy Blake, Peter Tsirigotis, Joseph-J Dougherty

RTR Bins12 OMB ProPkg14Sep10Ver1.doc compare of OMB 9 10 and

9 14 645.docx compare of OMB 9 10 and

9 14 645.docx
---

Exhibit 13.1


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 CEO Certification In connection with the annual report of Getty Copper Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Corby G. Anderson, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Corby G. Anderson Name: Corby G. AndersonTitle: President & Chief Executive Officer June 21, 2011 A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 20-F to which it relates, is not to be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 20-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.


---
1

From:

Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 7:02 PM

To: RedHill

Subject: Fuel Tank Leakage Concern

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

We join the Board of Water Supply in urging efforts by the Navy to ensure safe drinking water 

for Hawaii by taking the necessary steps to prevent further leakage from fuel tanks and to clean 

up the fuel that has already leaded out. We enjoy Hawaii’s great water, but its sources need 

protection. 

Save our water! 

Thank you,
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Nebraska Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Nebraska Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 6:30 
p.m. and adjourn at 8:00 p.m. on November 16, 2000, at the Doubletree 
Hotel, 1616 Dodge, Omaha, Nebraska 68102. The purpose of the meeting is 
to receive planning input for project development for the next two 
years.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Melvin L. Jenkins, Director of the 
Central Regional Office, 913-551-1400 (TDD 913-551-1414). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, October 20, 2000.
Lisa M. Kelly,
Special Assistant to the Staff Director, Regional Programs Coordination 
Unit.
[FR Doc. 00-27460 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P