alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. AS OF JUNE
30, 1997, AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                     $    35,566
<SECURITIES>                                    42,785
<RECEIVABLES>                                  162,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,911
<INVENTORY>                                     39,578
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               341,975
<PP&E>                                       3,016,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                 927,909
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,506,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          654,268
<BONDS>                                        983,364
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              279
<PREFERRED>                                     28,640
<COMMON>                                        61,289
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,903,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,506,128
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               678,174
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  628,442
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (24,325)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,694
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,363
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,925
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,438
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,438
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                              $      0.25
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27204]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

National Preservation Technology and Training Board: Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. Appendix (1988), that the National Preservation 
Technology and Training Board will meet on November 9 and 10, 2000 in 
Natchitoches, Louisiana.
    The Board was established by Congress to provide leadership, policy 
advice, and professional oversight to the National Center for 
Preservation Technology and Training, as required under the National 
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470).
    The Board will meet in the Nakatosh Room (Room 203), at the College 
of Business Building (Russell Hall), located on the campus of 
Northwestern State University of Louisiana, Sibley Drive, Natchitoches, 
Louisiana. Thursday, November 9 the meeting will start at 8:30 a.m. and 
end at about noon. Matters to be discussed will include officer, 
committee, university, National Park Service and center reports and the 
introduction of the New Executive Director.
    Friday, November 10, 2000 the meeting will start at 8:30 a.m. and 
end at noon. Matters to be discussed will included a review of past 
accomplishments of the Center and a look toward the future role of the 
NCPTT board with respect to the center and their partners in the 
preservation community. The meeting will be open to the public. 
However, facilities and space for accommodating members of the public 
are limited and persons will be accommodated on a first-come, first-
served basis. Any member of the public may file a written statement 
concerning the matters to be discussed with Dr. Elizabeth A. Lyon, 
Chair, National Preservation Technology and Training Board, P.O. Box 
1269, Flowery Branch, Georgia 30542.
    Persons wishing more information concerning this meeting, or who 
wish to submit written statements, may do so by contacting Mr. E. 
Blaine Cliver, Chief, HABS/HAER, National Park Service, 1849 C Street 
NW, Washington, DC 20240, telephone: (202) 343-9573. Draft summary 
minutes of the meeting will be available for public inspection about 
eight weeks after the meeting at the office of the Preservation 
Assistance Division, Suite 200, 800 North Capitol Street, Washington, 
DC.

    Dated: 17 October 2000.
E. Blaine Cliver,
Chief, HABS/HAER, Designated Federal Official, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 00-27204 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 2085

_____________________________
K IMBERLY B RINSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County

. Robert R. Wheeler , Judge

. August 30, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
L EWIS , M AKAR , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Kimberly Brinson, pro se
, Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      17,503,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               38,364,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,103,000
<INVENTORY>                                 65,286,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           124,981,000
<PP&E>                                      39,149,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,273,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             178,424,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,134,000
<BONDS>                                     12,843,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       171,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 111,755,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               178,424,000
<SALES>                                    277,702,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           277,702,000
<CGS>                                      210,713,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              210,713,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (13,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,678,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             23,719,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,053,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         15,666,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                15,666,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .79


</TABLE>
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 42810/42811/42812/42813/42814

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JEREMY ORVILLE JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 520

Filed: May 5, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Bonneville County. Hon. Joel E. Tingey, District Judge. 

Orders denying I.C.R. 35 motions for reduction of sentences, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

In docket number 42810, Jeremy Orville Johnson pled guilty to injury to jail, Idaho Code 

§ 18-718, and the district court imposed a unified sentence of three years with one year 

determinate, suspended the sentence, and placed Johnson on supervised probation. In docket 

number 42811, Johnson pled guilty to possession of methamphetamine, I.C. § 37-2732(c)(1), and 

the district court imposed a concurrent unified sentence of seven years with two years 

determinate, suspended the sentence, and placed Johnson on supervised probation. After 

Johnson violated his probation, the district court continued his supervised probation. 

Subsequently, Johnson again violated his probation and the district court revoked his probation 
2

and ordered his underlying sentences executed. Johnson filed Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motions 

for reduction of his sentences and both motions were denied by the district court.

In docket numbers 42812, 42813, and 42814, Johnson pled guilty to one count of 

delivery of methamphetamine in each case. The district court sentenced Johnson to concurrent 

unified sentences of twenty-five years with eight years determinate. Johnson filed I.C.R. 35 

motions for the reduction of his sentences, which the district court denied. Johnson appeals

asserting that the district court abused its discretion by denying his Rule 35 motions.

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency, 

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 

23, 24 (2006); State v. Gill, 150 Idaho 183, 186, 244 P.3d 1269, 1272 (Ct. App. 2010). In 

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of 

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the 

motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the 

record, including any new information submitted with Johnson’s Rule 35 motions, we conclude 

no abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s orders denying Johnson’s 

Rule 35 motions are affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of the deadline of April 17, 2001 for submission of a donation application for the Aircraft Carrier ex-Saratoga (CV-60) under the authority of 10 U.S.C. section 7306. Ex-Saratoga (CV-60) is located at the Naval Inactive Ship Maintenance Facility detachment, Naval Station, Newport, Rhode Island. Eligible recipients include: (1) Any State, Commonwealth, or possession of the United States or any municipal corporation or political subdivision thereof; (2) the District of Columbia; or, (3) any not-for-profit or nonprofit entity. Transfer of a vessel under this law shall be made at no cost to the United States. The transferee will be required to maintain the vessel in a condition satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy as a static museum/memorial. Prospective transferees must submit a comprehensive, detailed application addressing their plans for managing the significant financial, technical, environmental, and curatorial responsibilities that accompany ships donated under this program. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Gloria Carvalho, Navy Ship Donation Program, Program Executive Office for Expeditionary Warfare (PEO EXW), PMS333, Inactive Ship Program Office, Naval Sea Systems Command, 2531 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22242-5171, telephone number (703) 602-7098. 

Dated: October 19, 2000.

J.L. Roth, 

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-27521 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,990
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (714)
<INVENTORY>                                     90,526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,733
<PP&E>                                          52,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (35,860)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,378
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,650
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,744
<SALES>                                        256,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               256,285
<CGS>                                          186,902
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  186,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,701
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   138
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,723
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,473
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,112
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,361
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,361
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
        


</TABLE>
#### RODRIGUEZ v. STATE.

No. 23294.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 27, 1946.

W. W. Holland, Jr., of Houston, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was .convicted and assessed a penalty of five years in the penitentiary for possessing marijuana.

The record is before us without a statement of facts. No bills of exception have been presented for our consideration. The proceedings appear to be regular.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned President and Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies that, to his knowledge:



| | 1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ Carl H. Guild, Jr.              |  |  |  | /s/ Michael P. Malone                
|Carl H. Guild, Jr.                  |  |  |  | Michael P. Malone                    
|President & Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|                                    |  | 
|Date: February 12, 2007             |  |  |  | Date: February 12, 2007
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 20, 2022

No. 04-22-00603-CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellant

v.

DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC.,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022-CI-02683

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On September 19, 2022, appellant filed an unopposed motion to extend the time to file its 

notice of appeal. We GRANT appellant’s motion and deem appellant’s notice of appeal timely 

filed.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of September, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
J. Pickering Yocum has not alleged that the district court relied solely on impalpable or highly suspect evidence or that the sentencing statute is unconstitutional, see Chavez v. State, 125 Nev. 328, 347-48, 213 P.3d 476, 489-90 (2009), and fails to demonstrate that the district court abused its discretion at sentencing. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 1

cc: Hon. Jerome Polaha, District Judge Calvert & Hubach, LLC Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

'Although we filed the fast track statement submitted by Yocum, it fails to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure because it is not entirely double-spaced, see NRAP 32(a)(4), and the statement of facts section refers to matters in the record without specific citation to the appendix, see NRAP 3C(e)(1)(C). Counsel for Yocum is cautioned that the failure to comply with this court's briefing requirements may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(C) 1.947A
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 322 

To amend the Toxic Substances Control Act to clarify the jurisdiction of 

the Environmental Protection Agency with respect to certain sporting 

good articles, and to exempt those articles from a definition under that 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2013 

Mr. MILLER of Florida (for himself, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. 

BISHOP of Utah, Mrs. BLACK, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BONNER, Mr. 

BOUSTANY, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. 

COFFMAN, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. FINCHER, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. 

GRAVES of Missouri, Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas, Mr. HANNA, Mrs. 

HARTZLER, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. HUELSKAMP, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. JONES, Mr. JORDAN, Mr. KING

of Iowa, Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois, Mr. KLINE, Mr. LATTA, Mr. 

LUETKEMEYER, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. MATHESON, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. 

MICHAUD, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. NUGENT, Mr. 

NUNNELEE, Mr. OLSON, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. PETERSON, 

Mr. PITTS, Mr. POMPEO, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. ROSS, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. SOUTHERLAND, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. STUTZMAN, Mr. TERRY, Mr. THOMPSON of 

Mississippi, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. TIPTON, Mr. WALDEN, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. WOMACK, 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Toxic Substances Control Act to clarify the 

jurisdiction of the Environmental Protection Agency with 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 322 IH

respect to certain sporting good articles, and to exempt 

those articles from a definition under that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hunting, Fishing, and 

5 Recreational Shooting Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF DEFINITION. 

7 Section 3(2)(B) of the Toxic Substances Control Act 

8 (15 U.S.C. 2602(2)(B)) is amended— 

9 (1) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘, and’’ and insert10 ing ‘‘, or any component of any such article includ11 ing, without limitation, shot, bullets and other pro12 jectiles, propellants, and primers,’’; 

13 (2) in clause (vi) by striking the period at the 

14 end and inserting ‘‘, and’’; and 

15 (3) by inserting after clause (vi) the following: 

16 ‘‘(vii) any sport fishing equipment (as such 

17 term is defined in subsection (a) of section 4162 of 

18 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) the sale of 

19 which is subject to the tax imposed by section 

20 4161(a) of such Code (determined without regard to 

21 any exemptions from such tax as provided by section 

22 4162 or 4221 or any other provision of such Code), 

23 and sport fishing equipment components.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with