alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 1, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-408 Lower Tribunal No. 19-32602

________________ 

### MC Tours Roatan, S.A. , Appellant, vs. 

### Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. ,

Appellee. An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Peter R. Lopez, Judge. Marlow Adler Abrams Newman & Lewis, and Bruce R. Marx, for appellant. Hunton Andrews Kurth, LLP, Gustavo J. Membiela, and Crystal B. Carswell, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Jetbroadband WV, LLC v. MasTec N. Am., Inc., 13 So. 3d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).
Exhibit 32(b)

              SECTION 1350 Certification (Chief Financial Officer)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Financial Corporation, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I Jerry L. Rexroad,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the Report.

This Certification is provided as of February 11, 2004.


                                              /s/ Jerry L. Rexroad
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Jerry L. Rexroad
                                              Executive Vice President and Chief
                                              Financial Officer


                                       28
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT THOMPSON EVERETT, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. NATIONAL CABLE ADVERTISING, L.P.; CABLE NETWORKS, INCORPORATED; No. 96-1346 CABLE MEDIA CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees, and COX CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, Party in Interest. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-93-452) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: May 7, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Sa'ad El-Amin, Beverly D. Crawford, EL-AMIN & CRAWFORD, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Stephen A. Northup, Andrew G. Mauck, MAYS & VALENTINE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Appellant Thompson Everett, Inc. challenges the district court's order denying its motions objecting to the taxation of costs in favor of the Appellees for all depositions submitted with a successfulmotion for summary judgment. Although the motions contained technical defects, the district court considered them on the merits and denied relief. Finding no error, we affirm. Appellant filed an antitrust complaint against three large, national cable companies. Depositions were taken from fifty-eight witnesses, most of them noticed by Appellant. After discovery, the Appellees filed a motion for summary judgment, which was granted, and they were then awarded costs for these depositions. Appellant challenged the award on the ground that the parties agreed to take the depositions of more witnesses than allowed by local rule.* The district court, interpreting its own rule, found no violation and denied Appellant's motions for relief. A district court's interpretation of its own rules is entitled to great deference, and we find no abuse of discretion here. See United States Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Lawrenson , 334 F.2d 464, 467 (4th Cir. 1964) (district court is the best judge of its own rules). Only four non-party witnesses were attributed to the Appellees. Appellant asserts that ten more should have been attributed to them. Even if this were correct, there would be no violation of the rule because the Appellees were entitled to five non-party depositions each for a total of fifteen. We therefore affirm the order of the district court. We dispense

_________________________________________________________________ *Local Rule 11.1(B) allows each party to only depose five non-partywitnesses unless the court, pursuant to a written motion, permits otherwise.
2with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3
Exhibit 10.2

                         ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSE AGREEMENT

     This Assignment of License Agreement is entered into this 24th day of
March, 2005, by and between Fresh Ideas Media, Inc. a Nevada corporation and
Community Alliances, Inc., a Nevada corporation.

     WHEREAS, Fresh Ideas Media, Inc. a Nevada Corporation, did, on March 14,
2005, enter into a License Agreement with Venitech, LLC, a Colorado corporation,
which License Agreement gave Fresh Ideas Media, Inc. certain license rights
throughout the United States to a certain Business Concept involving "School
Folders" and other products, including, but not limited to methods of selling,
marketing, advertising, art and design concepts, forms, printing, agreements and
other items relating to the Business Concept and referred to collectively as
Intellectual Property, and such License Agreement also included the Registered
Trademarks, "Community Alliance" and "Our Best Wishes" and

     WHEREAS, Fresh Ideas Media, Inc. desires to assign the License Agreement
entered into by Fresh Ideas Media, Inc. and Venitech, LLC to Community Alliance,
Inc. and Community Alliance, Inc. desires to accept the assignment, and in so
doing, accept all responsibilities associated with the License Agreement, and
does hereby accept all terms of the License Agreement, and all amendments
thereto in the future, including any and all payments required to be paid under
the License Agreement.

     THEREFORE, Fresh Ideas Media, Inc. does hereby assign the said License
Agreement between Fresh Ideas Media, Inc. and Venitech, LLC to Community
Alliances, Inc. and Community Alliance, Inc. does hereby accept the assignment
of the License Agreement and all terms thereto.

     IT IS FURTHER AGREED that for the assignment of the License Agreement,
Community Alliance, Inc. shall issue to Fresh Ideas Media, Inc. a total of 100
shares of the authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock of the Company.


Fresh Ideas, Media, Inc.


By: /s/ Phil E. Ray
    ------------------------------
    Phil E. Ray - President

Community Alliance, Inc.


By: /s/ Phil E. Ray
    ------------------------------
    Phil E. Ray - President
Sunoco Partners LLC Executive Summary Compensation Sheet for 2006



 Exhibit 10.15 
  
 Sunoco Partners LLC 
 Executive Compensation Summary Sheet 
 for 2006 
  
 The table below presents 2006 summary information for named executive officers of Sunoco
Partners LLC, with regard to: base salary, and annual guideline incentive bonus opportunity under the Sunoco Partners LLC Annual Incentive Plan. 
  
 2006 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION1 
  

						
	 Name and Title

	  	2006 Base Salary
($)

	  	Annual Guideline Incentive
Bonus Opportunity
(%)

	 
	 Deborah M. Fretz
	  	455,000	  	70	%
	 President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	 	  	 	 
			
	 Colin A. Oerton
	  	256,230	  	40	%
	 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	  	 	  	 	 
			
	 Christopher W. Keene
	  	244,400	  	40	%
	 Vice President, Business Development
	  	 	  	 	 
			
	 Bruce D. Davis, Jr.
	  	228,230	  	30	%
	 Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
	  	 	  	 	 
			
	 David A. Justin
	  	216,840	  	30	%
	 Vice President, Eastern Operations
	  	 	  	 	 

  
 NOTES TO TABLE: 
  

	1.	The base salaries and incentive bonus opportunities shown in the foregoing table were approved at the January 24, 2006 meeting of the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of Sunoco Partners LLC.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
10QSB REPORT FOR THE QUARTER AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 10QSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000095898
<NAME> SWISS CHALET , INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,348,472
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  330,518
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     47,036
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,756,452
<PP&E>                                       6,566,032
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,026,367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,418,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          648,082
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       700,581
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,952,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,418,588
<SALES>                                        901,269
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,569,296
<CGS>                                           26,394
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,394
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               972,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                570,825
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            570,825
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   570,825
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21
  RED LION
    HOTELS CORPORATION
    List of Subsidiaries of Red Lion Hotels Corporation as of
    December 31, 2010
  A.
    WHOLLY
    OWNED SUBSIDIARIES  Name

State of OrganizationNorth River Drive Company

WashingtonRed Lion Hotels Holdings,
    Inc.(1)

DelawareRed Lion Properties,
    Inc.(2,3)

DelawareTicketsWest.com, Inc.

WashingtonRed Lion Hotels Franchising, Inc.

WashingtonWestCoast Hotel Properties,
    Inc.(4)

WashingtonWHC805, LLC

WashingtonRed Lion Anaheim, LLC

WashingtonRLH Denver Southeast, LLC

WashingtonRed Lion Hotels Management, Inc.

Washington     (1)
    
    Red Lion Hotels Holdings, Inc. wholly owns four special purpose
    financing Delaware limited liability companies, each of which
    wholly owns one Delaware limited liability company that owns one
    hotel property.(2)
    
    Wholly owned by Red Lion Hotels Holdings, Inc., which is wholly
    owned by the Company.(3)
    
    Red Lion Properties, Inc. wholly owns one special purpose
    financing Delaware limited liability company, which wholly owns
    one Delaware limited liability company, which owns one hotel
    property.(4)
    
    Wholly owned by Red Lion Hotels Franchising, Inc., which is
    wholly owned by the Company.  B.
    PARTIALLY
    OWNED SUBSIDIARIES  Name

State of OrganizationRed Lion Hotels Limited
    Partnership(1,2)

Delaware     (1)
    
    Red Lion Hotels Limited Partnership is 98.59% owned by the
    Company, and 0.53% owned by North River Drive Company, which is
    wholly owned by the Company.(2)
    
    Red Lion Hotels Limited Partnership wholly owns nine special
    purpose financing Delaware limited liability companies, each of
    which wholly owns one Delaware limited liability company that
    owns one hotel property. 1
I ,



## SERVED: JULY 31, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTERS OF 

### REGENT AEROSPACE CORPORATION

FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2013-0851 AND 

### REGENT AEROSPACE CORPORATION

FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2013-0852



### ORDER ON RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARYJUDGMENT Regent Aerospace Corporation, Respondent (hereinafter "Regent") filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in both above captioned matters. The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA") has filed its response in bothmatters. The pleadings contain information identified by the Administrator as sensitive information protectedby 14 C.F.R. § 193.

# i and "personal identifying information" (P.I.I.) protected underThePrivacy Act of 1974, 5U.S.C. §552a. We may seal all or portions ofthe record herein.

1 "When the FAA issues an order designating information as protected underthis part, the FAA does not disclose the information except as provided in this part..." 1

### WHEREFORE, Regent's Motion for Summary Judgment and the FAA's Response to Regent's Motion for Summary Judgmenthaving been read and considered it .be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: a) Regent's Motion for Summary Judgment be and is hereby DENIED withoutprejudice; and b) This matter will be set for hearing.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

2SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC-430 WilburWrightBuilding-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY Reza So!tanian, Respondent'sPresident Regent Aerospace Corporation and Airbase Services, Inc. 28110 West Harrison Parkway Valencia, CA 91355-4109 TEL: 661-257-3000 FAX: 661-702-0241
. JohnS. Hoff Jeffrey Clement, Respondent's Counsel HoffLaw Group 135 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 3300 Chicago, IL 60603-4134 TEL: 312-346-81 

### U FAX: 312-853-3924 Chris G. Zurales, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel, Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K Federal Aviation Administration 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 60018 TEL: 847-294-7713 FAX: 847-294-7498 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 3 FDMS Nos. FAA-2013-0851 & FAA-2013-0852 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430.
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3211 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2014 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to improve upon the 

definitions provided for points and fees in connection 

with a mortgage transaction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3211 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mortgage Choice Act 

3 of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF POINTS AND FEES. 

5 (a) AMENDMENT TO SECTION 103 OF TILA.—Sec6 tion 103(bb)(4) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

7 1602(bb)(4)) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)(B)’’ and insert9 ing ‘‘paragraph (1)(A) and section 129C’’; 

10 (2) in subparagraph (C)— 

11 (A) by inserting ‘‘and insurance’’ after 

12 ‘‘taxes’’; 

13 (B) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘, except as 

14 retained by a creditor or its affiliate as a result 

15 of their participation in an affiliated business 

16 arrangement (as defined in section 2(7) of the 

17 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 

18 (12 U.S.C. 2602(7))’’ after ‘‘compensation’’; 

19 and 

20 (C) by striking clause (iii) and inserting 

21 the following: 

22 ‘‘(iii) the charge is— 

23 ‘‘(I) a bona fide third-party 

24 charge not retained by the mortgage 

25 originator, creditor, or an affiliate of 

26 the creditor or mortgage originator; or 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3211 RDS

1 ‘‘(II) a charge set forth in section 

2 106(e)(1);’’; and 

3 (3) in subparagraph (D)— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘accident,’’; and 

5 (B) by striking ‘‘or any payments’’ and in6 serting ‘‘and any payments’’. 

7 (b) AMENDMENT TO SECTION 129C OF TILA.—Sec8 tion 129C of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1639c) 

9 is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)(5)(C), by striking ‘‘103’’ 

11 and all that follows through ‘‘or mortgage origi12 nator’’ and inserting ‘‘103(bb)(4)’’; and 

13 (2) in subsection (b)(2)(C)(i), by striking ‘‘103’’ 

14 and all that follows through ‘‘or mortgage origi15 nator)’’ and inserting ‘‘103(bb)(4)’’. 

16 SEC. 3. RULEMAKING. 

17 Not later than the end of the 90-day period beginning 

18 on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Bureau of 

19 Consumer Financial Protection shall issue final 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 3211 RDS

1 regulations to carry out the amendments made by this 

2 Act, and such regulations shall be effective upon issuance. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 9, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
November 22, 2010

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Counsel for the House of Representatives’ Committee on Energy

and Commerce

FROM: Kimberly Cochran Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

A conference call was held on November 22, 2010 between counsel for the House of Representatives’ Committee on Energy and Co mmerce and EPA to discuss how the proposed rule, “Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials that are Solid Wastes (NHSM),”

would characterize used oil. EP A explained that the definition of solid waste hinges on whether the material has been discarded and generally discussed how “on-spec” and “off-spec” used oil are affected using the proposed approach.

List of Meeting Attendees:

Melissa Cheatham, Energy & Commerce Committee Alexandra Teitz, Energy & Commerce Committee Jaqueline Cohen, Energy & Commerce Committee Raquel Snyder, EPA/OCIR Mike Galbraith, EPA/OSWER Marc Thomas, EPA/OSWER Kimberly Cochran, EPA/OSWER
#### RIOJAS v. STATE.

No. 25093.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 17, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

' George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*656DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The offense was the unlawful driving, while intoxicated, of a motor vehicle; the punishment, a fine of $50.

No hills of exception or statement of facts accompany the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
**Exhibit 32(ii)**

****

**CERTIFICATION**

******PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350**



In connect with the quarterly
report of Taylor Devices, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended November 30, 2005 to be filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on
or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

|Date: January 13, 2006 | By: | /s/ Mark V. McDonough                     
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                       |     | Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial
Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT - 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multimedia Tutorial Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Barry Reichman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.


By: /s/ Barry Reichman
----------------------
Barry Reichman
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  November 3, 2005