alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: "Adelberg, Kimberly Malm" <KMADELBE@southernco.com>

To: RobertJ W ayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/02/2012 12:31 PM Subject: RE: Materials Bob, These are the handouts we shared with OMB. I am not sending the Guidance since it is such a large document and you already have that. Lisa Jackson quote on CCS: "It can be years, maybe a decade or more, until we have the technology available at commerc ial scale" From Reuters article, "U.S. EPA to propose utility carbon rules next year" Nov. 17, 2011 Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/17/usa - epa - carbon - idUSN1E7AG0WU2011111 7 Kimberly Malm Adelberg Climate Strategy Manager Southern Company Research and Environmental Affairs 205.257.5526 Office 205.903.7053 Cell

----- Original Message ----- From: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:24 PM To: Adelberg, Kimberly Malm Sub ject: Re: Materials Thank you! bob Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division Mail Code D243 - 01 RTP, NC 27711 Phone: ( 919) 541 - 1045 Cell: (919) 306 - 2290 Fax: (919) 541 - 5450 e - mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt *************************************************** ******

From: "Adelberg, Kimberly Malm" <KMADELBE@southernco.com>To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/01/2012 02:21 PM Subject: Materials Bob, I did not have time to send materials, I am so sorry. I will send materials asap. A couple things you have that we will reference: BACT Guidance, Response to Comments on recent NSPS and Southern's comments on the planned GHG rulemaking. Kimberly Malm Adelberg Climate Strategy Manager Southern Company Research & Environmental Affairs 205.257.552 6 office 205.903.7053 cell Sent from my iPhone

Southern Company EPA - HQ - OAR - 2011 - 0090.pdf

NETL Project Fact Sheet. pdf CCS handouts.pdf Sample of EPA NSR Lawsuits and Targeted Projects.pdf EPA's background on NSPS.pdf

OM B Project Schedule.pdf EPA response to NSPS comments.PDF Jackson Reuters Thu Nov 17.pdf
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
ITEM 7 OF FORM 10K-SB FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001051902
<NAME>                        JV Web. Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                     U. S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          6902
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   58645
<ALLOWANCES>                    56589
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                18021
<PP&E>                          7332
<DEPRECIATION>                  3476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  72502
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           773702
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        130979
<OTHER-SE>                      (832179)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    72502
<SALES>                         93047
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                93047
<CGS>                           22200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   22200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                3043679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                56923
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              24636
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (3054356)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (3054356)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (3054356)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.29)



</TABLE>
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-024-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27336]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-226-002]


Mississippi Canyon Gas Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 18, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 13, 2000, Mississippi Canyon Gas 
Pipeline, LLC (MCGP) tendered for filing the following tariff sheets 
with a proposed effective date of October 1, 2000:

Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 27
Substitute Original Sheet No. 27A
Original Sheet No. 27B

    MCGP states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with an 
Order on Supplemental Filings issued on September 29, 2000, by the 
Commission in Docket No. RP00-226-001.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27336 Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### COBB v. STATE.

No. 25225.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 21, 1951.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

R. L. Whitehead, Crim. Dist. .Atty., David C. Moore, Asst.. Crim. Dist. Atty., Longview, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with unlawfully selling beer on Sunday between the hours of 1:00 A.M., and 1:00 P.M., and by the jury fined the sum of $500.00.

Two agents of the Texas Liquor Control Board testified relative to a sale at such time by appellant, which sale was denied by him, as well as by his wife. This question of fact was submitted to a jury under a charge not objected to by appellant, and they decided the question in a verdict of guilt and a fine in the amount stated above. • It is insisted that their verdict was excessive. Under the statute, a much heavier punishment could have been allotted to him.

No error, appearing in the record, the judgment will be affirmed. ;
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27446]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Uniformed Services University of the Health 
Sciences.

TIME AND DATE: 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., November 20, 2000.

PLACE: Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Board of 
Regents Conference Room (D3001), 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814-4799.

STATUS: Open--under ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 
552b(e)(3)).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   

8:30 a.m. Meeting--Board of Regents

(1) Approval of Minutes--September 8, 2000
(2) Faculty Matters
(3) Departmental Reports
(4) Financial Report
(5) Report--President, USUHS
(6) Report--Dean, School of Medicine
(7) Report--Dean, Graduate School of Nursing
(8) Comments--Chairman, Board of Regents
(9) New Business

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Mr. Bobby D. Anderson, Executive 
Secretary, Board of Regents, (301) 295-3116.

    Dated: October 20, 2000.
Linda Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-27446 Filed 10-20-00; 3:08 pm]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40988

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NORBERTO TREVINO-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:07-CR-693-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Norberto TrevinoRodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Trevino-Rodriguez has not filed

a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3302] 

In accordance with a notice from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, dated October 11, 2000, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning on October 3, 2000 and continuing through October 11, 2000. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.,*                     the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is December 3, 2000 and for economic injury the deadline is July 5, 2001.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) 

Dated: October 17, 2000.

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 00-27637 Filed 10-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NO. 07-02-0095-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	MAY 9, 2002

	______________________________

	JOHN J. HINDERA, APPELLANT

	V.

	TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY, ET AL., APPELLEES

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 237TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2000-509,053; HONORABLE SAM MEDINA, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	ON ABATEMENT

	Appellant John J. Hindera has appealed from orders of dismissal with prejudice entered in favor of appellees after summary judgment was sought by appellees.  We have received the clerk’s record in connection with the appeal, and appellant’s brief is due to be filed on May 17, 2002.

	However, appellees have filed a Notice of Suggestion of Bankruptcy in which they notify us that appellant has filed a petition for protection in Case No. 02-11388 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas.  Appellant has filed no response to this Notice of Suggestion of Bankruptcy.  Applicable federal statutes provide that we must stay all further proceedings in this matter that might affect appellant’s interest until we receive permission to proceed from the bankruptcy court.  See 11 USCA § 362 (West 1993 & Supp. 2001).  

	Accordingly, we must, and do, abate all proceedings in this appeal until appellant  is released from the supervision of the bankruptcy court.

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3134 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow charitable contributions 

made by an individual after the close of the taxable year, but before 

the tax return due date, to be treated as made in such taxable year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2013 

Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow charitable contributions made by an individual after the close 

of the taxable year, but before the tax return due date, 

to be treated as made in such taxable year. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Charitable Giving Ex5 tension Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3134 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MAKING CHARITABLE 

2 CONTRIBUTIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 170 of 

4 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesig5 nating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), 

6 respectively, and by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol7 lowing new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(2) TREATMENT OF CHARITABLE CONTRIBU9 TIONS MADE BY INDIVIDUALS BEFORE DUE DATE OF

10 RETURN.—If any charitable contribution is made by 

11 an individual after the close of a taxable year but 

12 not later than the due date (determined without re13 gard to extensions) for the return of tax for such 

14 taxable year, then the taxpayer may elect to treat 

15 such charitable contribution as made in such taxable 

16 year. Such election may be made only at the time of 

17 the filing of such return of tax and shall be signified 

18 in such manner as the Secretary may provide.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to contributions made in taxable 

21 years beginning after December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EX-10.1






February 22, 2006



Dwight W. Decker


Conexant Systems, Inc.


4000 MacArthur Blvd.


Newport Beach, CA 92660



Dear Dr. Decker,



On February 22, 2006 the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of
Directors (the “Committee”) of Conexant Systems, Inc.(the “Company”), granted you a Performance
Share Award (the “Award”) covering 275,000 shares of common stock of the Company under its 2001
Performance Share Plan (the “Plan”).



As set forth in the enclosed Terms and Conditions for your Award, the Award will vest or
terminate unvested based on your performance, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion
at such time or times as it determines. In making its determination, the Committee will assess your
performance based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, achievement and progress
in the areas of Conexant’s Phase III recovery strategy, strategic planning, financial management,
succession planning, leadership and investor relations.



The Committee will assess your performance against the foregoing and determine the vesting of
your Award. The Committee has full authority to determine if and to the extent your Award shall
vest. Any portion of your Award that vests shall be paid to you in cash, shares of the Company’s
common stock, or a combination of the foregoing, as determined in the Committee’s sole discretion.



A copy of the Plan and Plan Prospectus are enclosed herewith. Please carefully review these
documents, along with the enclosed Terms and Conditions, which set forth all of the provisions
governing your Award.



If you have any questions regarding this Award, please contact me directly.



Sincerely,



Michael Vishny


SVP, Human Resources
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 21, 2011 

y1114 

Order 

 

November 21, 2011 

143587 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143587 

 COA: 297383 

Washtenaw CC: 06-001674-FH 

SAMUEL MAXWELL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 21, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3194 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3194

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
to remove certain special deference provided by courts to the Bureau of 
     Consumer Financial Protection when the Bureau is interpreting 
            provisions of a Federal consumer financial law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2013

  Mr. Duffy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on 
   the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
to remove certain special deference provided by courts to the Bureau of 
     Consumer Financial Protection when the Bureau is interpreting 
            provisions of a Federal consumer financial law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bureau of Consumer Financial 
Protection Judicial Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF SPECIAL DEFERENCE.

    Section 1022(b)(4) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5512(b)(4)) is amended by striking 
subparagraph (B).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

     In connection with the Annual Report of Extendicare Health Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Report"), I, Mel Rhinelander, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify solely for purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. sec.
1350 that based on my knowledge:

          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                          /s/ MEL RHINELANDER
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Mel Rhinelander
                                          Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                          Executive Officer
                                          March 25, 2003
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANATOLIO BARCO ARAGON,

Petitioner,

v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 71147

Agency No. A214

- 276

- 171

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 5, 2020 * *

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Anatolio Barco Aragon , a native and citizen of Mexico , petitions for review
of the Board of Immigrati on Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his request for a continuance. We
have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 71147

agency’s denial of a continuance and decision to deem an application waived for

failure to adhere to an imposed deadline

. Cui v. Mukasey , 538 F.3d 1289, 1290
(9th Cir. 2008) (continuance); Taggar v. Holder , 736 F.3d 886, 889 (9th Cir. 2013)
( deeming application waived)

. We review de novo due process cl aims. Lin v.
Ashcroft , 377 F.3d 1014, 1023 (9th Cir. 2004)

. We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion or violate due process in denying

Aragon’s motion to continue and deeming his application for relief waived for

failure to adhere to the stated filing deadline

. T he IJ had previously notified
Aragon and his counsel of the filing deadline and consequences of missing it
, the
agency considered and rejected Aragon’s re ason for the continuance , and Aragon
was represented by counsel, was provided an opportunity to file an application for
relief, and has not shown that the timing of his receipt of his Freedom of
Information Act record prevented him from filing his applicat ion. See Taggar , 736
F.3d at 889 (agency did not abuse discretion in deeming application waived for
failing to adhere to deadline imposed by the IJ); Cui , 538 F.3d at 1292
( r easonableness of petitioner’s conduct a factor to consider when reviewing the
denial of a continuance) ; Vargas

- Hernandez v. Gonzales , 497 F.3d 919, 926

- 27
(9th Cir. 2007 ) (“Where an alien is given a full and fair opportunity to be
represented by counsel, prepare an application for

. . . relief, and to present

testimo ny and other evidence in support of the application, he or she has been3 19

- 71147

provided with due process.”)

. Finally, Aragon’s contention that the IJ failed to advise him of his apparent
eligibility for cancellation of removal is unsupported where he had already asserted

his intention to seek that form of relief.
Aragon’s motion for a stay of removal is denied as moot.

P ETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.