alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of the Mississippi Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 6:00 p.m. and adjourn at 8:00 p.m. on November 13, 2000, at the Crowne Plaza Hotel, 200 East Amite, Jackson, Mississippi 32901. The purpose of the meeting is to plan future projects. 

                    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation to the Committee, should contact Melvin L. Jenkins, Director of the Central Regional Office, 913-551-1400 (TDD 913-551-1414). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting                           ( print page 64203)                        and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.                 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC, October 20, 2000.

Lisa M. Kelly,

Special Assistant to the Staff Director, Regional Programs Coordination Unit. 

[FR Doc. 00-27459 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5528 

To suspend temporarily the duty on pistons for marine propulsion engines, 

each weighing 12 kilograms or more. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on pistons for marine 

propulsion engines, each weighing 12 kilograms or more. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PISTONS FOR MARINE PROPULSION ENGINES, 

4 EACH WEIGHING 12 KILOGRAMS OR MORE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Pistons for marine propulsion engines, each weighing 

12 kg or more (provided 

for in subheading 

8409.99.92) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5528 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our report dated March 30, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Evolving Systems, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Evolving Systems, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-167858, effective June 29, 2010, File No. 333-144852, effective July 25, 2007, File No. 333-116085, effective June 2, 2004,  and File No. 333-103655, effective March 7, 2003).

 

 

GRANT THORNTON LLP

Denver, Colorado

March 12, 2013

 

----
#### HALSEY v. COMMONWEALTH.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 31, 1952.

H. L. Rudd, of Mt. Sterling, F. T. Allen, of Campton, and E. C. Roberts, of Campton, for ¡movant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., and William F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., 'for opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Wolfe Circuit Court by Albert Halsey from judgment convicting him of selling whiskey in local option territory and fixing his punishment at a fine of $100 and confinement for 30 days in jail.

A careful consideration of the facts contained in t'he record, the questions raised, authorities cited and the law applicable, convinces us no error prejudicial to mov-ant’s substantial rights was committed, therefore the judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 21.1
                                                                    ------------


                          EXTENDED SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


  NAME
  ----

  Extended Systems of Idaho, Inc.
  Extended Systems International, Inc.
  Extended Systems GmbH
  Extended Systems U.S. Virgin Islands, Inc.
  Extended Systems of Wyoming, Inc.
  Extended Systems Limited
  Extended Systems SARL
  Extended Systems Italia SRL
  Counterpoint Systems Foundry, Inc.
  Rand Software Corporation
  Parallax Research Pte.
  Extended Systems Holdings Limited
  Advance Systems Limited
  Zebedee Software Limited
  Extended Systems Bristol Limited
  Extended Systems Benelux B.V.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         The undersigned, Terry Prichard, is the Chief Financial Officer of
Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company").

         This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September
30, 2002 (the "Report").

         By execution of this statement, I certify that:

                C)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                    U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

                D)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
                    periods covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
      that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report
      is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not
      intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

December 20, 2002                                      /s/ Terry Prichard
----------------------                               ---------------------------
Dated                                                  Terry Prichard
#### ALLEN v. STATE.

No. 23505.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 4, 1946.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1947.

No appearance, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for an aggravated assault, punishment being sixty days’ imprisonment in the county jail.

The transcript as originally filed failed to show any notice of appeal. This defect has been remedied by a supplemental transcript.

No bills of exception are brought forward complaining of any procedure during the trial. It is not thought necessary to detail the facts. They support the verdict and judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant claims the facts insufficient to support the conviction because venue was not proven.

The statement of facts sufficiently reflects that venue was proven, as alleged. Moreover, it will be presumed upon appeal that venue was proven in the trial court unless an issue was made thereon upon the trial of the case, and the record so reflects. Article 847, Vernon’s Code of Criminal Procedure, and authorities there cited.

There is nothing in the record before us showing that the rule stated was complied with.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned executive officers of BCSB Bankcorp, Inc. (the
Company) hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



By:

/s/    GARY C. LORADITCHName:

Gary C. LoraditchTitle:

PresidentBy:

/s/    BONNIE M. KLEINName:

Bonnie M. KleinTitle:

Vice President and Treasurer




Date: December 21, 2005
#### The State, ex rel. Stine, *v.*McCaw et al.

(No. 27626

Decided November 15, 1939.)

*43
      *Mr. M. Ray Allison,*for relatrix.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, *Mr. John P. Walsh*and *Mr. David M. Spriggs,*for respondents.

Hart, J.

It was conceded on oral argument that the amended petition of relatrix states facts which, if proven, would entitle her to relief as against the respondents McCaw and Sherwood.

It is apparent, however, from the amended petition that the complaint made and relief sought against the respondents McCaw and Sherwood are not identical with the complaint made and relief sought against the respondents Smith and Emmons, and that there is, therefore, a misjoinder of causes of action and of parties respondent. *O’Brien et al., Receivers,*v. *Fitzgerald,*143 N. Y., 377, 38 N. E., 371.

The relatrix seeks to have Elinor Hixenbaugh, who is not a party to this action, ousted from her position *44through a court order requiring the respondents Smith and Emmons to discontinue her incumbency and to disapprove the payment of her salary. In so doing the relatrix seeks, in effect, an .injunctive remedy to restrain and enjoin these respondents from recognizing the so-called incumbent. No specific official position is here involved, and the relatrix can be interested only in her own restoration to her former position.

This court has no original jurisdiction in injunction and the amended petition shows no cause of action in mandamus against the respondents Smith and Emmons. St*ate, ex rel. Penn Mutl. L. Ins. Co.,*v. *Hahn,*50 Ohio St., 714, 35 N. E., 1052.

The demurrer of the respondents Smith and Emmons to the amended petition is sustained on the ground that it does not state a cause of action against them, and the demurrer of the respondents McCaw and Sherwood is sustained on the ground that there is a misjoinder of parties respondent.

Leave will be granted to relatrix to plead further.

*Demurrers sustained.*

Weygandt, O. J., Day, Zimmerman and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Williams, J., concurs in the judgment.

Myers, J., not participating.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (977)
<INVENTORY>                                     91,519
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,190
<PP&E>                                          40,405
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (43,628)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,543
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,580
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,556
<SALES>                                        176,782
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               176,782
<CGS>                                          134,245
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  134,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,128
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   182
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,980
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,592
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,733
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,859
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,859
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51



</TABLE>
## Pharmacokinetics

Exclusive Property of the Council for the Advancement of Pyrethroid Human Risk Assessment, LLC (CAPHRA) 1

### Pharmacokinetics – Targeted Testing

2 Exclusive Property of the Council for the Advancement of Pyrethroid Human Risk Assessment, LLC (CAPHRA)Exclusive Property of the Council for the Advancement of Pyrethroid Human Risk Assessment, LLC (CAPHRA) 3Exclusive Property of the Council for the Advancement of Pyrethroid Human Risk Assessment, LLC (CAPHRA) 4

### Pharmacokinetics – Importance of Enzyme Ontogeny • Age- related differences in metabolic clearance • Species differences • Critical for building a sound PBPK models for developing rat and human

Exclusive Property of the Council for the Advancement of Pyrethroid Human Risk Assessment, LLC (CAPHRA) 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EXTENDICARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC. FOR THE
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,941
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,949
<INVENTORY>                                      1,693
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               233,787
<PP&E>                                         835,029
<DEPRECIATION>                                 224,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 974,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          174,009
<BONDS>                                        508,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     237,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   974,448
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               967,585
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  842,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               154,508
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                11,905
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,267
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (123,180)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (52,841)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (70,115)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (342)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (70,457)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (74)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                         608,891
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,945,722
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,339,608
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,906,968
<PP&E>                                       5,508,851
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,927,822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,117,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,989,086
<BONDS>                                      1,097,778
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           68,742
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,319,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,114,854
<SALES>                                      2,497,912
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,497,912
<CGS>                                        1,746,589
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,325,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,867)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                142,519
<INCOME-TAX>                                    54,425
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             88,094
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,298
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    95,684
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .033
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .032
        

</TABLE>
# Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet

Kentucky Division for Air Quality



# -------------------------------------------

Appendix L.9

New IMPROVE Equation

# KYDAQ letter to USEPA Region 4 requesting to use the new IMPROVE equation for BART

Modeling........................................................................................................3

Letter from USEPA Region 4 gran tin g its approval for three Ke ntucky sources to use the new

IMPROVE equation for BART Modeling. .................................................................6Enclosure 2Aerosol Scattering vs. Nephelometer ScatteringUsing New or Old IMPROVEAlgorithm and Daily f(RH)Mammoth Cave National Park, Kentucky 1995-2004New IMPROVEy = 0.98x + 7.63R2= 0.800501001502002503000 50 100 150 200 250 30024-hr Nephelometer bsp(Mm-1)

24-hr Aerosol b sp (Mm

-1 )Old IMPROVEy = 0.79x + 14.80R2= 0.840501001502002503000 50 100 150 200 250 30024-hr Nephelometer bsp(Mm-1)

24-hr Aerosol b sp (Mm

-1 )
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 15, 2014

NO. 03-11-00613-CR

John Richard Ahrens, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgments. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgments of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advanta Corp.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Philip
M. Browne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Philip M. Browne
--------------------
Philip M. Browne
Chief Financial Officer
May 6, 2004