Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 27189 

technology subject to the EAR (see 

§ 123.21(b) of this subchapter). 

* * * * * 

PART 124—AGREEMENTS, OFFSHORE PROCUREMENT, AND OTHER 

DEFENSE SERVICES 

■ 5. The authority citation for part 124 

is revised to read as follows: 

Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90– 

629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 

2797); 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C. 2776; 

Section 1514, Pub. L. 105–261; Pub. L. 111– 

266; Section 1261, Pub. L. 112–239; E.O. 

13637, 78 FR 16129. 

■ 6. Section 124.15 is amended by 

revising paragraphs (a) introductory 

text, (b) introductory text, (b)(2), and (c), 

to read as follows: 

§ 124.15 Special Export Controls for 

Defense Articles and Defense Services 

Controlled Under Category XV: Space 

Systems and Space Launches. 

(a) The export of a satellite or related 

item controlled by Category XV of part 

121 of this subchapter or any defense 

service controlled by this subchapter 

associated with the launch in, or by 

nationals of, a country that is not a 

member of the North Atlantic Treaty 

Organization (NATO) or a major nonNATO ally of the United States always 

requires special export controls, in 

addition to other export controls 

required by this subchapter, as follows: 

* * * * * 

(b) Mandatory licenses for launch 

failure (crash) investigations or analyses 

of any satellite controlled pursuant to 

this subchapter or subject to the EAR: In 

the event of a failure of a launch from 

a foreign country (including a post 

liftoff failure to reach proper orbit)— 

* * * * * 

(2) Officials of the Department of 

Defense must monitor all activities 

associated with the investigation or 

analyses to insure against unauthorized 

transfer of technical data or services and 

U.S. persons must follow the procedures 

set forth in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) 

of this section. 

(c) Although Public Law 105–261 

does not require the application of 

special export controls for the launch of 

U.S.-origin satellites and components 

from or by nationals of countries that 

are members of NATO or major nonNATO allies, such export controls may 

nonetheless be applied, in addition to 

any other export controls required 

under this subchapter, as appropriate in 

furtherance of the security and foreign 

policy of the United States. Further, the 

export of any article or defense service 

controlled under this subchapter to any 

destination may also require that the 

special export controls identified in 

paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this 

section be applied in furtherance of the 

security and foreign policy of the United 

States. 

* * * * * 

Rose E. Gottemoeller, 

Acting Under Secretary, Arms Control and 

International Security, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2014–10806 Filed 5–12–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–25–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Indian Affairs 

25 CFR Part 23 

[134A2100DD/AAK3000000/

A0H501010.999900] 

RIN 1076–AF21 

Change of Address; Indian Child 

Welfare Act 

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Final rule; technical 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Affairs 

(BIA) is amending its regulations to 

reflect a change of address for filing 

copies of Indian Child Welfare Act 

(ICWA) notices to the Eastern Regional 

Director and to update the titles of 

‘‘Area Directors’’ to ‘‘Regional 

Directors.’’ This technical amendment is 

a nomenclature change that updates and 

corrects BIA officials’ titles and the 

address for filing ICWA notices to the 

Eastern Regional Director. 

DATES: Effective May 13, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office of 

Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative 

Action, (202) 273–4680; 

elizabeth.appel@bia.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule 

updates the address for the Eastern 

Regional Office, which was printed in 

error. BIA employees have ensured that 

notices sent to the printed address have 

been forwarded to the BIA authorities, 

but this rule will make the forwarding 

unnecessary. This rule also updates all 

references to ‘‘Area Director’’ in 25 CFR 

part 23 to be ‘‘Regional Director’’ in 

accordance with the nomenclature 

currently in use. 

Procedural Requirements 

A. Regulatory Planning and Review 

(E.O. 12866 and 13563) 

Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides 

that the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) will 

review all significant rules. OIRA has 

determined that this rule is not 

significant. E.O. 13563 reaffirms the 

principles of E.O. 12866 while calling 

for improvements in the nation’s 

regulatory system to promote 

predictability, to reduce uncertainty, 

and to use the best, most innovative, 

and least burdensome tools for 

achieving regulatory ends. The E.O. 

directs agencies to consider regulatory 

approaches that reduce burdens and 

maintain flexibility and freedom of 

choice for the public where these 

approaches are relevant, feasible, and 

consistent with regulatory objectives. 

E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that 

regulations must be based on the best 

available science and that the 

rulemaking process must allow for 

public participation and an open 

exchange of ideas. We have developed 

this rule in a manner consistent with 

these requirements. This rule is also 

part of the Department’s commitment 

under the Executive Order to reduce the 

number and burden of regulations and 

provide greater notice and clarity to the 

public. 

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Department of the Interior 

certifies that this rule will not have a 

significant economic effect on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.). 

C. Small Business Regulatory 

Enforcement Fairness Act 

This rule is not a major rule under 5 

U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business 

Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. It 

will not result in the expenditure by 

State, local, or tribal governments, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100 million or more in any one year. 

The rule’s requirements will not result 

in a major increase in costs or prices for 

consumers, individual industries, 

Federal, State, or local government 

agencies, or geographic regions. Nor will 

this rule have significant adverse effects 

on competition, employment, 

investment, productivity, innovation, or 

the ability of the U.S.-based enterprises 

to compete with foreign-based 

enterprises. 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This rule does not impose an 

unfunded mandate on State, local, or 

tribal governments or the private sector 

of more than $100 million per year. The 

rule does not have a significant or 

unique effect on State, local, or tribal 

governments or the private sector. A 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

27190 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

statement containing the information 

required by the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not 

required. 

E. Takings (E.O. 12630) 

Under the criteria in Executive Order 

12630, this rule does not affect 

individual property rights protected by 

the Fifth Amendment nor does it 

involve a compensable ‘‘taking.’’ A 

takings implication assessment is 

therefore not required. 

F. Federalism (E.O. 13132) 

Under the criteria in Executive Order 

13132, this rule has no substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. This rule 

ensures notification to State and local 

governments of a BIA official’s decision 

to take land into trust and the right to 

administratively appeal such decision. 

This rule also ensures notification to 

State and local governments of an AS– 

IA official’s decision through 

publication in the Federal Register. 

G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988) 

This rule complies with the 

requirements of Executive Order 12988. 

Specifically, this rule has been reviewed 

to eliminate errors and ambiguity and 

written to minimize litigation; and is 

written in clear language and contains 

clear legal standards. 

H. Consultation With Indian Tribes 

(E.O. 13175) 

In accordance with the President’s 

memorandum of April 29, 1994, 

‘‘Government-to-Government Relations 

with Native American Tribal 

Governments,’’ Executive Order 13175 

(59 FR 22951, November 6, 2000), and 

512 DM 2, we have determined there are 

no potential effects on federally 

recognized Indian tribes and Indian 

trust assets. 

I. Paperwork Reduction Act 

This rule does not contain any 

information collections requiring 

approval under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et 

seq. 

J. National Environmental Policy Act 

This rule does not constitute a major 

Federal action significantly affecting the 

quality of the human environment 

because it is of an administrative, 

technical, and procedural nature. 

K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 

13211) 

This rule is not a significant energy 

action under the definition in Executive 

Order 13211. A Statement of Energy 

Effects is not required. 

L. Determination To Issue Final Rule 

Without the Opportunity for Public 

Comment and With Immediate Effective 

Date 

BIA is taking this action under its 

authority, at 5 U.S.C. 552, to publish 

regulations in the Federal Register. 

Under the Administrative Procedure 

Act, statutory procedures for agency 

rulemaking do not apply ‘‘when the 

agency for good cause finds . . . that 

notice and public procedure thereon are 

impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 

to the public interest.’’ 5 U.S.C. 

553(b)(3)(B). BIA finds that the notice 

and comment procedure are 

impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 

to the public interest, because: (1) These 

amendments are non-substantive; and 

(2) the public benefits for timely 

notification of a change in the official 

agency address, and further delay is 

unnecessary and contrary to the public 

interest. Similarly because this final rule 

makes no substantive changes and 

merely reflects a change of address and 

updates to titles in the existing 

regulations, this final rule is not subject 

to the effective date limitation of 5 

U.S.C. 553(d). 

List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 23 

Administrative practice and 

procedures, Child welfare, Grant 

programs—Indians, Grant programs— 

social programs, Indians, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the Department of the 

Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 

amends part 23 in Title 25 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations as follows: 

PART 23—INDIAN CHILD WELFARE 

ACT 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 23 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 2, 9, 

1901–1952. 

■ 2. Throughout part 23, remove the 

word ‘‘Area Director’’ and ‘‘Area 

Directors’’ and add in their place the 

words ‘‘Regional Director’’ and 

‘‘Regional Directors’’ respectively, 

wherever they appear. 

■ 3. In § 23.11, revise paragraph (c)(1) to 

read as follows: 

§ 23.11 Notice. 

* * * * * 

(c)(1) For proceedings in Alabama, 

Connecticut, Delaware, District of 

Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, 

Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, 

Massachusetts, Mississippi, New 

Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, 

North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode 

Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, 

Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, or any 

territory or possession of the United 

States, notices shall be sent to the 

following address: Eastern Regional 

Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 545 

Marriott Drive, Suite 700, Nashville, 

Tennessee 37214. 

* * * * * 

Dated: May 1, 2014. 

Kevin K. Washburn, 

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 2014–10934 Filed 5–12–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R08–OAR–2012–0168; FRL–9756–5] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Utah; 

Revisions to UAC Rule 401—Permit: 

New and Modified Sources 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

approve State Implementation Plan 

revisions submitted by the State of Utah 

on April 17, 2008 and partially approve 

SIP revisions submitted by the State of 

Utah on September 15, 2006. The 

revisions contain new rules in Utah’s 

Title 307 Rule 401 (Permit: New and 

Modified Sources). The intended effect 

of this action is to propose to approve 

the rules that are consistent with the 

Clean Air Act. This action is being taken 

under sections 110 and 112 of the Clean 

Air Act. 

DATES: This final rule is effective June 

12, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R08–OAR–2012–0168. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., CBI or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES