76784 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 244 / Thursday, December 19, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

Unfunded Mandates Assessment 

Title II of the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4) 

requires each Federal agency to prepare 

a written statement assessing the effects 

of any Federal mandate in a proposed or 

final agency rule that may result in an 

expenditure of $100 million or more (in 

1995 dollars) in any one year by State, 

local, and tribal governments, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector; such 

a mandate is deemed to be a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action.’’ The FAA currently 

uses an inflation-adjusted value of 

$143.1 million in lieu of $100 million. 

This proposed rule does not contain 

such a mandate; therefore, the 

requirements of Title II of the Act do not 

apply. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures,’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 7, 2013, and effective 

September 15, 2013, is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 3000 Subpart B—Class B 

Airspace. 

* * * * * 

ANM UT B Salt Lake City, UT [Amended] 

Salt Lake City International Airport (Primary 

Airport) 

(Lat. 40°47′18′′ N., long. 111°58′40′′ W.) 

Wasatch VORTAC (TCH) 

(Lat. 40°51′01′′ N., long. 111°58′55′′ W.) 

Hill AFB (HIF) 

(Lat. 41°07′26′′ N., long. 111°58′23′′ W.) 

Boundaries. 

By removing the current descriptions of 

Area C and Area O, and adding in its place: 

Area C. That airspace extending upward 

from 6,000 feet MSL to and including 12,000 

feet MSL, within an area bounded by a line 

beginning at the TCH 316° radial 11.6-mile 

DME at lat. 40°59′21′′ N., long. 112°09′33′′ W.; 

thence east to a point west of the power lines 

at the TCH 006° radial 9.5-mile DME at lat. 

41°00′28′′ N., long. 111°57′36′′ W.; thence 

southeast to a point west of the power lines 

at the TCH 016° radial 8.1-mile DME at lat. 

40°58′48′′ N., long. 111°55′58′′ W.; thence 

south to the TCH 020° radial 6.6-mile DME 

at lat. 40°57′13′′ N., long. 111°55′56′′ W.; 

thence west to a point southeast of Seagull 

Point on Antelope Island at the TCH 304° 

radial 9.3-mile DME at lat. 40°56′13′′ N., long. 

112°09′05′′ W.; thence north to the point of 

beginning. 

Area O. That airspace extending upward 

from 7,500 feet MSL to and including 12,000 

feet MSL, within an area bounded by a line 

beginning at the intersection of U.S. Highway 

89 and a 4.3-mile radius from Hill AFB at the 

TCH 014° radial 13.6-mile DME at lat. 

41°04′11′′ N., long. 111°54′39′′ W.; thence 

clockwise along the 4.3-mile radius from Hill 

AFB to 1700 South St. at the TCH 347° radial 

14.7-mile DME at lat. 41°05′20′′ N., long. 

112°03′21′′ W.; thence west along W. 1700 

South St. to the TCH 329° radial 16.8-mile 

DME at lat. 41°05′22′′ N., long. 112°10′20′′ W.; 

thence south to the TCH 316° radial 11.6- 

mile DME at lat. 40°59′21′′ N., long. 

112°09′33′′ W.; thence east to a point west of 

the power lines at the TCH 006° radial 9.5- 

mile DME at lat. 41°00′28′′ N., long. 

111°57′36′′ W.; thence southeast to a point 

west of the power lines at the TCH 016° 

radial 8.1-mile DME at lat. 40°58′48′′ N., long. 

111°55′58′′ W.; thence south to the TCH 020° 

radial 6.6-mile DME at lat. 40°57′13′′ N., long. 

111°55′56′′ W.; thence south to the 

intersection of Redwood Rd. and W. 500 

South St. at the TCH 049° radial 3.1-mile 

DME at lat. 40°53′02′′ N., long. 111°55′48′′ W.; 

thence south to Center St. at the TCH 102° 

radial 2.3-mile DME at lat. 40°50′32′′ N., long. 

111°55′57′′ W.; thence east along Center St. 

to I–15 at the TCH 099° radial 3-mile DME 

at lat. 40°50′32′′ N., long. 111°54′56′′ W.; 

thence north along I–15 to U.S. Highway 89 

at the TCH 024° radial 9-mile DME at lat. 

40°59′14′′ N., long. 111°54′05′′ W.; thence 

north along U.S. Highway 89 to the point of 

beginning. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on December 

12, 2013. 

Donna Warren, 

Acting Manager, Airspace Policy and 

Regulations Group. 

[FR Doc. 2013–30097 Filed 12–18–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0915; Airspace 

Docket No. 12–ASO–41] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Proposed Modification, Revocation, 

and Establishment of Area Navigation 

(RNAV) Routes; Charlotte, NC 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

establish two RNAV routes; modify 

three RNAV routes; and remove one 

RNAV route in the Charlotte, NC, area. 

The route changes are proposed to 

support the Charlotte Optimization of 

Airspace and Procedures in a Metroplex 

(OAPM) project. The proposed routes, 

in combination with existing VOR 

Federal airways, would provide 

additional routing options through and 

around the Metroplex airspace. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before February 3, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001; telephone: 

(202) 366–9826. You must identify FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2013–0915 and 

Airspace Docket No. 13–ASO–41 at the 

beginning of your comments. You may 

also submit comments through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Gallant, Airspace Policy and 

Regulations Group, Office of Airspace 

Services, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 244 / Thursday, December 19, 2013 / Proposed Rules 76785 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA– 

2013–0915 and Airspace Docket No. 13– 

ASO–41) and be submitted in triplicate 

to the Docket Management Facility (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number). You may also submit 

comments through the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this action must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2013–0915 and 

Airspace Docket No. 12–AEA–41.’’ The 

postcard will be date/time stamped and 

returned to the commenter. 

All communications received on or 

before the specified closing date for 

comments will be considered before 

taking action on the proposed rule. The 

proposal contained in this action may 

be changed in light of comments 

received. All comments submitted will 

be available for examination in the 

public docket both before and after the 

closing date for comments. A report 

summarizing each substantive public 

contact with FAA personnel concerned 

with this rulemaking will be filed in the 

docket. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. An informal 

docket may also be examined during 

normal business hours at the office of 

the Eastern Service Center, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Room 210, 

1701 Columbia Ave., College Park, GA 

30337. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRM’s should 

contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, 

(202) 267–9677, for a copy of Advisory 

Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking Distribution System, which 

describes the application procedure. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is proposing an amendment 

to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) part 71 to establish two lowaltitude RNAV routes (T–206 and T– 

214); modify three RNAV routes (T–201, 

T–202 and T–203); and remove one 

RNAV route (T–200), in the Charlotte, 

NC, area. 

The following actions are proposed: 

T–200: The FAA is proposing to 

remove T–200 in its entirety. T–200 

extends between the Foothills, GA, 

VORTAC (ODF) and the Florence, SC, 

VORTAC (FLO). It passes through the 

RICHE fix at the very south end of the 

Charlotte Class B airspace area. T–200 is 

seldom used as it traverses very close to 

the ‘‘final box’’ for Charlotte/Douglas 

International Airport (CLT) when CLT is 

landing to the north. The proposed 

modification of T–202 (see below) 

would provide routing through the 

south end of the CLT Class B airspace 

area in place of T–200. Aircraft flying 

from ODF to FLO, and vice versa, would 

fly direct rather than utilizing the 

RICHE fix. Therefore, it was determined 

that realignment of T–200 is 

impractical. 

T–201: T–201 extends between the 

Columbia, SC, VORTAC (CAE) and the 

JOTTA, NC, fix. This proposed 

modification would shorten the length 

of the route so that it would extend 

between the MEVAE, SC, waypoint 

(WP) (near Bethune, SC) at the south 

end, and the BORTZ, NC, WP (south of 

the JOTTA fix) at the north end. In 

addition, the track of the route would be 

shifted approximately seven nautical 

miles (NM) to the east of its current 

position. The shift would move the 

route to the east of the CLT Class B 

airspace area where it would pass 

through the FEGNO, NC, WP instead of 

the LOCAS, NC, fix (on the eastern 

boundary of the Class B airspace area). 

The modified route would segregate low 

altitude overflight traffic from CLT 

departure and arrival traffic while 

keeping the T–201 designator. 

Waypoints along the route would 

provide connectivity with RNAV routes 

T–202, T–206 and T–214 (described 

below). Also along the route, the 

TRUEX, SC, WP would serve as an 

ingress/egress point for the Florence, 

SC, Terminal Radar Approach Control 

(TRACON) airspace. 

T–202: T–202 now extends between 

the RICHE, SC, fix and the GANTS, NC, 

fix. This proposal would extend the 

route at both ends: northeastward from 

the GANTS fix to the ZADEL WP (near 

Asheboro Municipal Airport, NC (HBI); 

and westward from the RICHE fix to the 

GURSH WP (near Union County Airport 

(35A), SC). The modified route would 

utilize airspace around the south of CLT 

when CLT is landing and departing to 

the south. That segment from the RICHE 

WP to the HUSTN WP would segregate 

T–202 traffic from CLT departures. 

Waypoints along the route would 

provide connectivity to T–201, T–206 

and T–214. Additionally, the GANTS fix 

is located at the boundary of the 

Charlotte and Greensboro TRACONs 

airspace. This would minimize the 

impact on satellite and adjacent airport 

operations by providing a predictable 

track for overflight traffic while keeping 

the T–202 designator. 

T–203: T–203 extends between the 

Columbia, SC, VORTAC (CAE) and the 

Pulaski, VA, VORTAC (PSK). The FAA 

proposes to shorten the route by 

changing the endpoints to the ANDYS, 

SC, fix (near Winnsboro, SC) at the 

south end, and the OREAD, NC, WP (10 

miles north of Hickory, NC) at the north 

end. In addition, the track would be 

shifted slightly to the west of its current 

position but still transiting through the 

west side of the CLT Class B airspace 

area. By routing T–203 via the ROUTH, 

NC, WP (near Grover, SC), transiting 

aircraft would be segregated from CLT 

departure airspace. The modified route 

would keep the T–203 designator. 

Waypoints along the route would 

provide connectivity to T–202, T–206 

and T–214. 

T–206: T–206 would be established to 

extend between the ENADE, NC, WP 

(near Cliffside, NC) and the ZADEL, NC, 

WP (near Asheboro Regional Airport 

(HBI), NC). The route would be used to 

transition aircraft through the north side 

of the CLT Class B airspace area when 

CLT is landing and departing to the 

north. Waypoints along the route would 

provide connectivity to T–201, T–202, 

T–203 and T–214. Additionally, the 

alignment of T–206 through the GOTHS, 

NC, WP (northwest of the existing 

MOPED, NC, fix) would deconflict 

transiting traffic from CLT departures. 

T–214: T–214 would be established to 

extend between the OREAD WP and the 

ORPEE, NC, WP (north of Troy, NC). 

This route would allow aircraft to 

transition north of the CLT Class B 

airspace, but within the Metroplex area, 

when CLT is landing and departing to 

the north. Greensboro TRACON (GSO) 

radar vectors aircraft that are filed for 

points northwest of CLT in order to 

separate them from CLT arrivals that are 

inbound from the northeast. Once they 

are clear of the arrivals, GSO then clears 

the aircraft direct to the Holston 

Mountain, TN, VORTAC (HMV) to 

resume their filed routes. T–214 would 

provide a predictable route to points 

northwest and west of Charlotte that are 

deconflicted from the CLT arrival flow. 

The routes proposed in this notice 

would be segregated from the heavily 

used arrival and departure corridors 

serving the Charlotte area and would 

enhance the efficiency of the National 

Airspace System in the Charlotte, NC, 

Metroplex area. 

RNAV routes are published in 

paragraph 6011 of FAA Order 7400.9X 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
76786 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 244 / Thursday, December 19, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

dated August 7, 2013, and effective 

September 15, 2013, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The RNAV routes listed in this 

document would be subsequently 

published in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. 

Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) 

Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that would only affect air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this proposed rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in 

Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 

40103. Under that section, the FAA is 

charged with prescribing regulations to 

assign the use of the airspace necessary 

to ensure the safety of aircraft and the 

efficient use of airspace. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority as 

it would modify the route structure as 

required to preserve the safe and 

efficient flow of air traffic in the 

Charlotte, NC, area. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures,’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9X, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, Dated August 7, 2013, and 

effective September 15, 2013, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6011—United States Area 

Navigation Routes 

T–200 Foothills, GA to Florence, SC [Removed] 

T–201 MEVAE, SC to BORTZ, NC [Amended] 

MEVAE, SC WP (Lat. 34°25′05′′ N., long. 80°22′28′′ W.) 

TRUEX, SC WP (Lat. 34°35′55′′ N., long. 80°21′18′′ W.) 

FEGNO, NC WP (Lat. 35°14′49′′ N., long. 80°16′39′′ W.) 

NUROE, NC WP (Lat. 35°34′37′′ N., long. 80°31′15′′ W.) 

BORTZ, NC WP (Lat. 35°52′56′′ N., long. 80°44′56′′ W.) 

T–202 GURSH, SC to ZADEL, NC [Amended] 

GURSH, SC. WP (Lat. 34°42′05′′ N., long. 81°30′32′′ W.) 

AWRYT, SC WP (Lat. 34°42′00′′ N., long. 81°14′52′′ W.) 

RICHE, SC FIX (Lat. 34°41′54′′ N., long. 80°59′23′′ W.) 

HUSTN, NC FIX (Lat. 34°53′20′′ N., long. 80°34′20′′ W.) 

FEGNO, NC WP (Lat. 35°14′49′′ N., long. 80°16′39′′ W.) 

GANTS, NC FIX (Lat. 35°27′11′′ N., long. 80°06′16′′ W.) 

ZADEL, NC. WP (Lat. 35°33′47′′ N., long. 80°01′47′′ W.) 

T–203 ANDYS, SC to OREAD, NC [Amended] 

ANDYS, SC FIX (Lat. 34°22′15′′ N., long. 81°08′38′′ W.) 

AWRYT, SC WP (Lat. 34°42′00′′ N., long. 81°14′52′′ W.) 

ROUTH, NC WP (Lat. 35°10′38′′ N., long. 81°23′59′′ W.) 

FADOS, NC WP (Lat. 35°28′22′′ N., long. 81°20′49′′ W.) 

OREAD, NC WP (Lat. 35°52′03′′ N., long. 81°16′32′′ W.) 

T–206 ENADE, NC to ZADEL, NC [New] 

ENADE, NC WP (Lat. 35°12′08′′ N., long. 81°44′41′′ W.) 

FADOS, NC WP (Lat. 35°28′22′′ N., long. 81°20′49′′ W.) 

GOTHS, NC WP (Lat. 35°35′17′′ N., long. 80°58′25′′ W.) 

NUROE, NC WP (Lat. 35°34′37′′ N., long. 80°31′15′′ W.) 

ZADEL, NC WP (Lat. 35°33′47′′ N., long. 80°01′47′′ W.) 

T–214 OREAD, NC to ORPEE, NC [New] 

OREAD, NC WP (Lat. 35°52′03′′ N., long. 81°16′32′′ W.) 

BORTZ, NC WP (Lat. 35°52′56′′ N., long. 80°44′56′′ W.) 

THMSN, NC WP (Lat. 35°53′21′′ N., long. 80°28′57′′ W.) 

ZADEL, NC WP (Lat. 35°33′47′′ N., long. 80°01′47′′ W.) 

ORPEE, NC WP (Lat. 35°27′12′′ N., long. 79°52′56′′ W.) 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 244 / Thursday, December 19, 2013 / Proposed Rules 76787 

Issued in Washington, DC, on December 

11, 2013. 

Ellen Crum, 

Acting Manager, Airspace Policy and 

Regulations Group. 

[FR Doc. 2013–30098 Filed 12–18–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION 

17 CFR Parts 1, 15, 17, 19, 32, 37, 38, 

140 and 150 

RIN 3038–AD99 

Position Limits for Derivatives 

Correction 

In proposed rule document 2013– 

27200 appearing on pages 75679 

through 75842 in the issue of Thursday, 

December 12, 2013, Table 10 is 

corrected to appear as seen below. 

TABLE 10—OPEN INTEREST AND CALCULATED LIMITS BY CORE FUTURES REFERENCED CONTRACT, JANUARY 1, 2011, TO

DECEMBER 31, 2012 

Commodity type Core referenced 

futures contract Year Open interest (daily average) 

Open interest 

(month end) 

Limit 

(daily average) 

Limit 

(month end) Limit 

Legacy Agricultural ..... CBOT Corn (C) ........... 2011 2,063,231 1,987,152 53,500 51,600 53,500 

2012 1,773,525 1,726,096 46,300 45,100 ........................

CBOT Oats (O) ........... 2011 15,375 15,149 1,600 1,600 1,600 

2012 12,291 11,982 1,300 1,200 ........................

CBOT Soybeans (S) ... 2011 822,046 798,417 22,500 21,900 26,900 

2012 997,736 973,672 26,900 26,300 ........................

CBOT Soybean Meal 

(SM).

2011 237,753 235,945 7,900 7,800 9,000 

2012 283,304 281,480 9,000 9,000 ........................

CBOT Soybean Oil 

(SO).

2011 392,658 382,100 11,700 11,500 11,900 

2012 397,549 388,417 11,900 11,600 ........................

CBOT Wheat (W) ....... 2011 565,459 550,251 16,100 15,700 16,200 

2012 572,068 565,490 16,200 16,100 ........................

ICE Cotton No. 2 (CT) 2011 275,799 272,613 8,800 8,700 8,800 

2012 259,608 261,789 8,400 8,500 ........................

KCBT Hard Winter 

Wheat (KW).

2011 183,400 177,998 6,500 6,400 6,500 

2012 155,540 155,074 5,800 5,800 ........................

MGEX Hard Red 

Spring Wheat 

(MWE).

2011 55,938 54,546 3,300 3,300 3,300 

2012 40,577 40,314 2,900 2,900 ........................

Other Agricultural ........ CBOT Rough Rice 

(RR).

2011 21,788 21,606 2,200 2,200 2,200 

2012 15,262 14,964 1,600 1,500 ........................

CME Milk Class III 

(DA).

2011 55,567 57,490 3,300 3,400 3,400 

2012 47,378 47,064 3,100 3,100 ........................

CME Feeder Cattle 

(FC).

2011 44,611 43,730 3,000 3,000 3,000 

2012 44,984 43,651 3,000 3,000 ........................

CME Lean Hog (LH) ... 2011 284,211 288,281 9,000 9,100 9,400 

2012 296,822 297,882 9,300 9,400 ........................

CME Live Cattle (LC) 2011 433,581 440,229 12,800 12,900 12,900 

2012 409,501 417,037 12,200 12,400 ........................

ICUS Cocoa (CC) ....... 2011 191,801 198,290 6,700 6,900 7,100 

2012 202,886 206,808 7,000 7,100 ........................

ICE Coffee C (KC) ...... 2011 174,845 176,079 6,300 6,300 7,100 

2012 204,268 207,403 7,000 7,100 ........................

ICE FCOJ–A (OJ) ....... 2011 37,347 36,813 2,900 2,800 2,900 

2012 30,788 29,867 2,700 2,700 ........................

ICE Sugar No. 11 (SB) 2011 814,234 806,887 22,300 22,100 23,500 

2012 855,375 862,446 23,300 23,500 ........................

ICE Sugar No. 16 (SF) 2011 11,532 11,662 1,200 1,200 1,200 

2012 10,485 10,530 1,100 1,100 ........................

Energy ........................ NYMEX Henry Hub 

Natural Gas (NG).

2011 4,831,973 4,821,859 122,700 122,500 149,600 

2012 5,905,137 5,866,365 149,600 148,600 ........................

NYMEX Light Sweet 

Crude Oil (CL).

2011 4,214,770 4,291,662 107,300 109,200 109,200 

2012 3,720,590 3,804,287 94,900 97,000 ........................

NYMEX NY Harbor 

ULSD (HO).

2011 559,280 566,600 15,900 16,100 16,100 

2012 473,004 485,468 13,800 14,100 ........................


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1