alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bernhard Baur Date: 07 October 2013
Federal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA) 

# FAA MCAI INFORMATION FORM

To: Federal Aviation Administration, USA

Aircraft Certification Service

Federal Aviation Administration

Aircraft Manufacturer/Model ECAA AD/Revision No./Date Service Bulletin/Revision No./Date

Pilatus / PC

- 7 FOCA AD HB

- 2013

- 009 / 0 / Oct 07/13 SB 24

- 009 / 0 / Sept 06/13

1. Describe the unsafe condition, AND its root cause. Include description of how the problem could affect the safe operation of the airplane.

If an electrical cable becomes chafed through the insulation, a short circuit could cause a fire in the engine compartment.

2. Provide the number and description of occurrences which prompted the AD.

During a n aircraft survey an operator reported that several cases were discovered of wiring chafing against the ECS h ose installation on the engine tubular mounting frame on the RH side of the engine
compartment . Chafing is caused by contact with the spiral steel wire that can protrude from the ECS air

hose cover when this deteriorate d.

3. What is the compliance time and consequences if extended? What would be considered an appropriate grace period for compliance?

This SB shall be accomplished within 90 days after issuance of the SB

. No extension of the compliance is foreseen at this time.

4. Cost of parts and/or installa tion workhours for the owner/operator (data from the manufacturer and their supplier, if applicable)

Refer to SB 24

- 009

.

5. If parts are required, are they available for all aircraft?

SB does not specify any special parts and the required parts can be supp lied by the operator.

6. What category best describes the cause of the unsafe condition:

Design Problem Quality Control Problem Operational

Maintenance Unapproved Par ts Other (Specify)

7. Should a ferry flight be permitted? If no, why not?

Yes No

8. Number of aircraft affected, by model designation and serial number (U.S. registered and worldwide)

517 aircraft worl dwide of which 1 0 a ircraft are registered in the USA.

9. Is further action anticipated to be necessary to correct this unsafe condition? If so, please provide description and recommended compliance time.

Generic instructions should be added to the AMM sect ion addressing installation of ECS spiral

- wound

hoses. In support of the FAA’s actions to address your country’s mandatory continued airworthiness information (MCAI) in the United States, please provide the items highlighted below, if

not conta ined in the referenced airworthiness directive (AD)

or service information.Bernhard Baur Date: 07 October 2013
Federal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA) 10. Other:

None.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**[BEARD MILLER COMPANY LLP LETTERHEAD]**

 

**CONSENT OF BEARD MILLER COMPANY LLP**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-53295, 333-85025 and 333-87932) on FormS-8 of our report dated November 30, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements as of BCSB Bankcorp, Inc. which is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BCSB Bancorp, Inc., for the year endedSeptember 30, 2005. 

 

/s/ Beard MillerCompany LLP 

 

Baltimore, Maryland 

December 29, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RT01-77-000]

Take notice that on October 16, 2000, Southern Company Services, Inc., acting on behalf of Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, Mississippi Power Company, and Savannah Electric and Power Company (collectively referred to as Southern Companies), filed a Petition for Declaratory Order in compliance with the Commission's Order No. 2000. In their Petition, Southern Companies proposed the formation of a Gridco that would be a Regional Transmission Organization. Southern Companies also proposed a ratemaking approach for the Gridco.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene, comments, or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions, comments and protests should be filed on or before November 20, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Beginning November 1, 2000, comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper.                     *See*18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *­http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-27551  Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
2179 N POWERLINE ROAD STE 1 POMPANO BEACH , FL 33069 

## Current Principal Place of Business:

Current Mailing Address: 2179 N POWERLINE ROAD STE 1 POMPANO BEACH , FL 33069 US Entity Name: TECNOMEDIA & SATELLITE SERVICES LLC DOCUMENT# L14000087377

FEI Number: 32-0441526 Certificate of Status Desired: Name and Address of Current Registered Agent: REGOJO, ANTONIO 3550 BISCAYNE BLVD #507 MIAMI , FL 33137 US
The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida. 

## SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date 

## Authorized Person(s) Detail :

I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that I am a managing member or manager of the limited liability company or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 605 , Florida Statutes; and that my name appears above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered

. 

## SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Signing Authorized Person(s) Detail Date 

# FILED Mar 30 , 2015 Secretary of State CC0418639285

CLAUDIO P FERNANDEZ MGR 03/30/2015 2015 FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT

No

Title MGR Name FERNANDEZ, CLAUDIO P Address 2179 N POWERLINE ROAD STE 1 City-State-Zip: POMPANO BEACH FL 33069
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3060 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 389
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3060

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                              May 21, 2014

               Reported by Mr. Carper, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 232 Southwest Johnson Avenue in Burleson, Texas, as the ``Sergeant 
                 William Moody Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT WILLIAM MOODY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 232 Southwest Johnson Avenue in Burleson, Texas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sergeant William Moody Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
William Moody Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 389

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3060

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 232 Southwest Johnson Avenue in Burleson, Texas, as the ``Sergeant 
                 William Moody Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 21, 2014

                       Reported without amendment
```
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket** Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 1231 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM088AD

737 - 78 - 1086, R1 --- 5/15/12 737 - 78 - 1086 --- 10/6/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
#### The Standard Oil Co., Appellant, *v.*Zangerle, County Aud., et al., Appellees.

(No. 27717

Decided November 1, 1939;

and adhered to after rehearing, December 27, 1939.)

*Messrs. Holliday, Grossman & McAfee*and *Mr. Rufus S. Day, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Mr. Frank T. GulUtan,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Saul S. Danaceau,*for appellee, county auditor.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. Perry L. Graham,*for appellee, Tax Commission of Ohio.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the rea*213son no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40487

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MICHELLE ANGELIC MADRID,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:13-CR-10-1

Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michelle Angelic 

Madrid has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Madrid has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 21, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40487 Document: 00513350856 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/21/2016
No. 15-40487

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-40487 Document: 00513350856 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/21/2016
#### JONES v. STATE.

No. 26176.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 10, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for a violation of the liquor law in Lubbock County, Texas. The punishment assessed is a fine of $300.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. All matters of procedure appear to be in regular form.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 21



Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                                                         |  |                                             |  |                     |  
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | -
|                                                         |  | State or Other Jurisdiction ofIncorporation |  | PercentageOwnership |  
|Parent                                                   |  |                                             |  |                     |  
|BCSB Bankcorp, Inc.                                      |  | United States                               |  |                     |  
|                                                         |  |                                            
|Subsidiary(1)                                            |  |                                             |  |                     |  
|Baltimore County Savings Bank, F.S.B.                    |  | United States                               |  | 100                 | %
|BCSB Bankcorp Capital Trust I                            |  | Delaware                                    |  | 100                 | %
|BCSB Bankcorp Capital Trust II                           |  | Delaware                                    |  | 100                 | %
|                                                         |  |                                            
|Subsidiaries of Baltimore County Savings Bank, F.S.B.(1) |  |                                             |  |                     |  
|Baltimore County Service Corp.                           |  | Maryland                                    |  | 100                 | %
|Ebenezer Road, Inc.                                      |  | Maryland                                    |  | 100                 | %

---

|(1) | The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report to Stockholders
attached hereto as Exhibit 13.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41972-41973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17196]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 19 July 2012, at 9:00 a.m. in the Commission offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street 
NW., Washington DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks, and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by emailing staff@cfa.gov; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

[[Page 41973]]

    Dated: July 9, 2012 in Washington, DC.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-17196 Filed 7-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6331-01-M
```
#### WRIGHT v. STATE.

No. 24386.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 25, 1949.

,No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated. Fine of $50.00 was the punishment assessed.

As the record is brought forward, the proceedings appear regular. We find no *663statement of facts nor bills of exception, and nothing is presented for review by this Court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from The
Bombay Company, Inc. quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the six months
ended August 1, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000096287
<NAME> THE BOMBAY COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                           37010
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      84314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                137237
<PP&E>                                           94780
<DEPRECIATION>                                   54303
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  188234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            29073
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         38139
<OTHER-SE>                                      114267
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    188234
<SALES>                                         150354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                150354
<CGS>                                           112960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   158676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1120)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7202)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2845)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4357)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4357)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
#### FLORES v. STATE.

No. 25068.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 17, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was indicted for robbery by assault and was by the jury convicted of an aggravated assault and given a penalty of a $1,000.00 fine and confinement in the county jail for two years.

This indictment merely charges a simple assault and a robbery thereby. It contains none of the elements of an aggravated assault.

Under the case, of Foreman v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 57 S.W. 843, on motion for a rehearing, it was held that a charge of *654robbery by assault with no allegations relative to the use of a deadly weapon, nor further description of the assault, such indictment did not. include the elements of an aggravated assault. See Munson v. State, 21 Tex.App. 329, 17 S.W. 251; Huntsman v. State, 12 Tex.App. 619. This matter was fully discussed in the recent case of Tomlin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 233 S.W.2d 303.

Upon the authority of that case, the judgment in the present instance will be reversed and the cause remanded.
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Dwayne Powell, is the President and Chief Executive Officer
of Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc. (the Company).



This
statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005 (the Report).



By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This statement is authorized to
be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|                  |  |                   
|----------------- |  | ------------------
|December 22, 2005 |  | /s/  Dwayne
Powell
|Dated             |  | Dwayne Powell
Exhibit 23.01
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (No. 333-63393, No. 333-77879, No. 333-86069, No.333-86071, No. 333-30512) of CSK Auto Corporation of our reportdated April 24,2003 relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in thisForm 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our reportdated April 24, 2003 relating to the financial statement schedules, whichappear in this Form 10-K.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP