alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2




 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     of Title 18 Of The United States Code
                     -------------------------------------

I, Ernest J. Mrozek, the President and Chief Financial Officer of The
ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.




                                 /s/ Ernest J. Mrozek
                                 --------------------
                                 Ernest J. Mrozek
                                 President and Chief Financial Officer
                                 March 15, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The ServiceMaster Company and will be retained by The ServiceMaster
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40893

Summary Calendar

__________________

JOE RICHARD RANDLE, JR.,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SALLY CANNON, CO. III, ET AL.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:94-CV-525

- - - - - - - - - -

February 23, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joe Richard Randle, Jr., appeals the district court's

dismissal of his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district

court dismissed his action for failure to prosecute under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b). This dismissal was an abuse of discretion as

Randle had not engaged in any delay or contumacious conduct. 

McNeal v. Papasan, 842 F.2d 787, 790 (5th Cir. 1988). 

Accordingly, the dismissal is VACATED and the case REMANDED to

the district court for further proceedings.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00514-CR

Zavion Hall

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13CR460-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by 

this Court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 19, 2014
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-548-001]

Take notice that on October 13, 2000, Gulf States Transmission Corporation (Gulf States), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 58K. Gulf States requests that these sheets be made effective October 1, 2000.

Gulf States states that the tendered sheet is being filed in compliance with the Commission's October 5 Letter Order issued in Docket No. RP00-548-000.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-27266  Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Summary of Compensation to our Named Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.25 
 SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION TO OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
 On February 20, 2006, after a review of performance,
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Cabela’s Incorporated (“Cabela’s”) established fiscal 2006 base salaries and determined fiscal 2005 cash bonuses under Cabela’s Restated Bonus Plan (the
“Plan”) for Cabela’s Named Executive Officers (as defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Reg. S-K). 
 Fiscal 2006 base salaries for Cabela’s
Named Executive Officers are as follows: 
  

						
	 Name
	  	 Title
	  	2006 Base Salary
	Dennis Highby	  	President and Chief Executive Officer	  	$	670,683
	Patrick A. Snyder	  	Senior Vice President of Merchandising	  	$	413,418
	Michael Callahan	  	Senior Vice President, Retail Operations and Marketing	  	$	413,418
	Ralph W. Castner	  	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and interim Chief Executive Officer of World’s Foremost Bank	  	$	322,144
	Brian J. Linneman	  	Vice President and Chief Operating Officer	  	$	263,609
	
	Fiscal 2005 cash bonuses for Cabela’s Named Executive officers under the Plan are as follows:
			
	 Name
	  	 Title
	  	2005 Cash Bonus
	Dennis Highby	  	President and Chief Executive Officer	  	$	1,650,000
	Patrick A. Snyder	  	Senior Vice President of Merchandising	  	$	500,000
	Michael Callahan	  	Senior Vice President, Retail Operations and Marketing	  	$	500,000
	Ralph W. Castner	  	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and interim Chief Executive Officer of World’s Foremost Bank	  	$	415,000
	Brian J. Linneman	  	Vice President and Chief Operating Officer	  	$	415,000

 Each of Messrs. Highby, Snyder, Callahan, Castner, and Linneman are employed “at will.” Fiscal 2006 base
salaries for Cabela’s Named Executive Officers will be effective March 19, 2006, and fiscal 2005 cash bonuses for Cabela’s Named Executive Officers will be payable on March 3, 2006. 
 Cabela’s Named Executive Officers are parties to respective Management Change of Control Severance Agreements with Cabela’s and are eligible to receive an
annual bonus award pursuant to Cabela’s Restated Bonus Plan. Cabela’s Named Executive Officers also are eligible to participate in Cabela’s broad-based benefit plans, including health and life insurance programs, 401(k) Savings Plan,
and Employee Stock Purchase Plan, to receive awards under Cabela’s 2004 Stock Plan, and to receive certain perquisites offered by Cabela’s, including discounted prices on merchandise. 
 Additional information regarding the compensation awarded to Cabela’s Named Executive Officers in respect of and during fiscal 2005 will be set forth in the
sections titled “Summary Compensation Table” and “Options Granted in Last Fiscal Year” of the Proxy Statement for Cabela’s 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”), which sections are
incorporated herein by reference. The Proxy Statement is expected to be filed with the SEC in March 2006.
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________

No. 09-1466

________

DOROTHY RHUE ALLEN,

by her Attorney in fact, James Martin,

Individually and as a class representative on behalf

of others similarly situated,

Appellant

v.

LASALLE BANK, N.A;

CENLAR FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK FSB;

FEIN, SUCH, KAHN AND SHEPARD, PC;

JOHN DOE SERVICERS 1-100;

JOHN DOE LAW FIRMS 1-100

________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. No. 3-08-cv-02240)

District Judge: Honorable Anne E. Thompson

________

Argued September 13, 2010

Before: SLOVITER, BARRY, and SMITH

 Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above case, filed January 12,

2011 be amended as follows:
2

Page 3, line 3, “Federal Debt Collection Practices Act” should be deleted 

and replaced by “Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.”

By the Court,

 /s/ Dolores K. Sloviter 

 Circuit Judge

Dated: January 13, 2011
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-20-00252-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF JULIA LOPEZ, DECEASED

From the County Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20140322PR1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Andrew Lopez, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal in this matter. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Appellant states that he “no longer wishes to appeal this 

matter and requests that the Court dismiss this case.” Dismissal of this appeal will not 

prevent any other party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. 

Accordingly, the motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed.

We also note that appellant has not paid the filing fees for this appeal. Absent a 

specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the time a document 

is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP. P., Order 

Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007); see TEX. R. APP. P. 5; TEX.
In the Estate of Lopez Page 2

GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207(b), 51.208, 51.941(a). Under these circumstances, we suspend 

the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX. R. APP. P.

2. The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates 

or reduces the fees owed by appellant.

JOHN E. NEILL

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed October 14, 2020

[CV06]
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of Circle  Group  Holdings,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Dana L. Dabney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/S/  DANA L. DABNEY
---------------------
Dana L. Dabney
Chief Financial Officer
April 2, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64212-64213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27555]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RT01-2-000]


PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., et al; Notice of Filing

October 20, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 11, 2000, pursuant to section 35.34(h) 
of the Commission's regulations, 18 CFR 35.34(h), and the Commission's 
July 20, 2000 ``Notice of Guidance for Processing Order No. 2000 
Filings'' in Docket No. RM99-2-000, Allegheny Electric Cooperative, 
Inc., Atlantic City Electric Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric 
Company, Delmarva Power & Light Company, Jersey Central Power & Light 
Company, Metropolitan Edison Company, PECO Energy Company, Pennsylvania 
Electric Company, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, Potomac Electric 
Power Company, Public Service Electric & Gas Company, and UGI Utilities 
Inc. (collectively, PJM Transmission Owners) and PJM Interconnection. 
L.L.C. (PJM) jointly submitted an Order No. 2000 compliance filing.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Atlantic City Electric Company and Delmarva Power and Light 
Company do business as Conectiv. Jersey Central Power & Light 
Company, Metropolitan Edison Company and Pennsylvania Electric 
Company do business as GPU Energy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The filing requests that the Commission find that PJM is an RTO in 
compliance with Order No. 2000, and requests that the Commission accept 
for filing certain changes to its Tariff and Transmission Owners 
Agreement. The filing requests an effective date of January 1, 2001.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene, comments, or protest with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
and Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and

[[Page 64213]]

385.214). All such motions, comments and protests should be filed on or 
before November 20, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Beginning November 1, 
2000, comments and protests may be filed electronically via the 
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27555 Filed 10-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27491]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-56-000]


Transwestern Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

October 20, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 17, 2000, Transwestern Pipeline Company 
(Transwestern) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be 
effective December 1, 2000:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 18
Seventeenth Revised Sheet No. 48
Original Sheet No. 98
Sheet No. 99
First Revised Sheet No. 157
Original Sheet No. 158

    Transwestern states that the purpose of this filing is to provide 
Transwestern and its firm Shippers with the ability to enter into 
options to call on firm transportation capacity at a specified future 
date and options to terminate all or a portion of an existing service 
agreement at a specified future date.
    Transwestern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Transwestern's customers and interested State Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27491 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Report of the thirty-fourth meeting of the Open-ended Working Group of the Parties to the 

Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, p 27

Available at: http://conf.montreal-protocol.org/meeting/oewg/oewg34/reports/Conference%20Room%20Papers%20CRP/OEWG-34-6E.doc

D. Draft decision on laboratory and analytical uses

Submission by the United States of America

Recalling decisions VII/11 and XXI/6, in which the Meeting of the Parties 

requested all parties to urge their national standards-setting organizations to identify and 

review their standards for laboratory and analytical procedures that mandate the use of 

Montreal Protocol controlled substances with a view to adopting, where possible, 

laboratory and analytical products and processes that do not use controlled substances,

Recalling also decisions VII/11, XI/15, XVIII/15 and XIX/18, by which the 

Meeting of the Parties eliminated specific uses from the global exemption for laboratory 

and analytical uses,

1. To extend the global laboratory and analytical-use exemption until 31 

December 2021, under the conditions set out in annex II to the report of the Sixth Meeting 

of the Parties and decisions XV/8, XVI/16 and XVIII/15, for the controlled substances 

under the Montreal Protocol in all annexes and groups except Annex C, group 1;

2. To request the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel to report no later 

than 2018 on the development and availability of laboratory and analytical procedures that 

can be performed without using controlled substances under the Montreal Protocol;
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                          WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
                                   FORM 10-KSB
                          YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

                       CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL RESULTS

I, Cynthia A. Mahl, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify the following:

      -     This Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Sections
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      -     The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial position and results of operations
            of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc. as of and for the periods
            presented.


                                   /s/ Cynthia A. Mahl
                                   Cynthia A. Mahl
                                   Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
                                   March 28, 2003


                                  Page 93 of 93
AFS-13-073-E

January 11, 2013

 Exemption No. 4298N

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2003-14245

Mr. Paul W. Railsback

Director of Operations

Airlines for America, Inc.

1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1100

Washington, DC 20004-1707

Dear Mr. Railsback:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 4298, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated November 13, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Air Transport Association of America, Inc. (ATAA) dba Airlines for 

America (A4A), for an extension of Exemption No. 4298, as amended. The exemption from 

§§ 121.311(f) and 121.391(d) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows A4A 

member airlines and similarly situated certificate holders operating under part 121 to continue 

to locate a required flight attendant at the mid-cabin flight attendant station during takeoff and 

landing on Boeing 767 airplanes.

In your petition, you indicate there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative 

to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to A4A.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 4298, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, 

under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I grant your petition. All conditions and limitations of Exemption 

No. 4298, as amended, remain the same. 

Conditions and Limitations

1. If operations with four required flight attendants are conducted, one flight attendant 

must be located adjacent to a forward Type A exit, two flight attendants must be 

located adjacent to the two aft Type A exits, and one flight attendant may be located in 

the mid-cabin cross aisle area between the two non-floor level Type III exits.

2. If operations with five required flight attendants are conducted, two flight attendants 

must be located adjacent to the two forward Type A exits, two flight attendants must 

be located adjacent to the two aft Type A exits, and one flight attendant may be located 

in the mid-cabin cross aisle between the two non-floor level Type III exits.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 4298, as amended, to 

March 31, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen

Director, Flight Standards Service
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-114120 on Form S-8pertaining to the Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan and in RegistrationStatement No. 333-143400 pertaining to the Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998Stock Option Plan of our report dated March 12, 2008, whichreport is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSBof Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.Crowe Chizek and Company LLCCleveland, Ohio