alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of the Arkansas Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 6:00 p.m. and adjourn at 8:00 p.m. on November 15, 2000, at the Doubletree Hotel, 424 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201. The purpose of the meeting is to plan future projects. 

Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation to the Committee, should contact Melvin L. Jenkins, Director of the Central Regional Office, 913-551-1400 (TDD 913-551-1414). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting. 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC, October 20, 2000.

Lisa M. Kelly,

Special Assistant to the Staff Director, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. 00-27458 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3174 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1, 2013 

Received 

DECEMBER 20, 2013 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to obligate 

funds for emergency relief projects arising from damage 

caused by severe weather events in 2013, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3174 RFS

1 SECTION 1. EMERGENCY RELIEF PROJECTS. 

2 The Secretary of Transportation may obligate any 

3 funds made available to implement section 125 of title 23, 

4 United States Code, for emergency relief projects arising 

5 from damage caused by severe weather events in 2013, 

6 without any limitation on obligations for such projects re7 sulting from a single natural disaster or a single cata8 strophic failure in a State. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 21.1** **SUBSIDIARIES**     Belk-Simpson Company, Greenville, South Carolina (incorporated    in South Carolina)    United Electronic Services, Inc. (incorporated in Virginia)    The Belk Center, Inc. (incorporated in North Carolina)    Belk International, Inc. (incorporated in North Carolina)    Belk Stores Services, Inc. (incorporated in North Carolina)    Belk Administration Company (incorporated in North Carolina)    (Subsidiary of Belk Stores Services, Inc.)    Belk Stores of Virginia LLC (incorporated in North Carolina)    (Subsidiary of Belk Stores Services, Inc.)    Belk Accounts Receivable LLC (incorporated in North Carolina)    (Subsidiary of Belk Stores Services, Inc.)    Belk Gift Card Company LLC (incorporated in North Carolina)    Belk Merchandising LLC (incorporated in North Carolina)    (Subsidiary of Belk International, Inc.)    Belk Department Stores LP (organized in North Carolina)    Belk Texas Holdings LLC (incorporated in North Carolina)    (Subsidiary of Belk Stores Services, Inc.)
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  Amendment  No.1 of Wherify  Wireless,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-KSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2005,  as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


June 23, 2006                       /s/ Mark E. Gitter
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Mark E. Gitter, Chief Financial Officer,
                                    Treasurer
                                    (Principal Accounting Officer)
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan



 Exhibit 10.1.2 
 TECO ENERGY GROUP 
 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 
 First Amendment to 1998 Restatement 
 The TECO Energy
Group Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is amended as follows, effective for payments commencing June 1, 2005, and later: 
  

	 	1.	Section 3.1 is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

 3.1 Annual earnings has the same meaning as in the retirement plan, except that the same will be determined without regard to any dollar limitation on such annual earnings that may be imposed under the retirement plan. 
  

	 	2.	Section 5.4 is deleted and the following is substituted for it: 

 5.4 Form of Payment. Notwithstanding any provisions of the plan to the contrary (including, without limitation, references to payments as a monthly pension), the only form of retirement benefit payable to a
participant under the plan is a commuted lump sum payment that is the actuarial equivalent of a life annuity (including the value of the post-retirement surviving spouse benefit under Section 6.2(c)). Actuarial equivalence will be based on the
actuarial assumptions specified from time to time in the retirement plan for lump sum payments. The lump sum payment will be made as soon as practicable after the date that is six months after the date of separation from service (or, if earlier, the
date of death of the participant) and shall be credited with interest at the same rate used to calculate the actuarial equivalence. 
  

	 	3.	Sections 6.3 and 6.4 are deleted and the following are substituted for them: 

 6.3 Form and time of surviving spouse benefit. Notwithstanding any provisions of the plan to the contrary (including, without
limitation, references to monthly survivor income payments), surviving spouse benefits under this Section 6 will be payable only in the form of a lump sum payment that is the actuarial equivalent of a life annuity to the surviving spouse. The
lump sum payment will be made on, or as soon as practicable after, the first day of the month on or after the date of the participant’s death. 







 6.4 Death benefit where lump sum paid. If a participant received a lump sum
payment of his benefit under Section 5.4, no surviving spouse benefit or other death benefit will be payable under the plan to any person. 
 EXECUTED on May 26, 2005. 
  

			
	TECO ENERGY, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Clinton E. Childress

		 	Clinton E. Childress
		 	Chief Human Resources Officer
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 15-1159V 

Filed: February 15, 2017 

UNPUBLISHED 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

LISA STUFFLE, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

v. * Influenza (“Flu”); Shoulder Injury 

 * Related to Vaccine Administration 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Ronald Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner. 

Jennifer Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On October 9, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she received an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on 

October 15, 2013, and subsequently suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special 

Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 

On February 14, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he 

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent agrees that petitioner’s claim satisfies the 

requirements set forth in Althen v. HHS, 418 F.3d 1274, 1278 (Fed. Cir. 2005), and that 

her alleged injury was caused-in-fact by a vaccination. Id. at 4. Respondent further 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
2

agrees that petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the 

Vaccine Act. Id.

 In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27521]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Deadline for Submission of Donation Application for the 
Aircraft Carrier ex-Saratoga (CV-60)

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of the deadline 
of April 17, 2001 for submission of a donation application for the 
Aircraft Carrier ex-Saratoga (CV-60) under the authority of 10 U.S.C. 
section 7306. Ex-Saratoga (CV-60) is located at the Naval Inactive Ship 
Maintenance Facility detachment, Naval Station, Newport, Rhode Island. 
Eligible recipients include: (1) Any State, Commonwealth, or possession 
of the United States or any municipal corporation or political 
subdivision thereof; (2) the District of Columbia; or, (3) any not-for-
profit or nonprofit entity. Transfer of a vessel under this law shall 
be made at no cost to the United States. The transferee will be 
required to maintain the vessel in a condition satisfactory to the 
Secretary of the Navy as a static museum/memorial. Prospective 
transferees must submit a comprehensive, detailed application 
addressing their plans for managing the significant financial, 
technical, environmental, and curatorial responsibilities that 
accompany ships donated under this program.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Gloria Carvalho, Navy Ship 
Donation Program, Program Executive Office for Expeditionary Warfare 
(PEO EXW), PMS333, Inactive Ship Program Office, Naval Sea Systems 
Command, 2531 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22242-5171, 
telephone number (703) 602-7098.

    Dated: October 19, 2000.
J.L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-27521 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27434]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties can 
review or obtain copies of agreements at the Washington, DC offices of 
the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Room 940. Interested 
parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal 
Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within 10 days of the date 
this notice appears in the Federal Register.
Agreement No.: 011729
Title: CMA-CGM/Norasia Slot Charter Agreement
Parties:
    CMA-CGM S.A.(``CMA-CGM'')
    Norasia Container Lines Ltd. (``Norasia'')
Synopsis: The proposed agreement authorizes CMA-CGM to charter space to 
Norasia on its vessels operating in the trade between the port of Los 
Angeles and ports in Japan, Korea and China. The agreement will expire 
on May 1, 2001 unless earlier terminated. The parties have requested 
expedited review.

Agreement No.: 011730
Title: The GWF/Dole Space Charter Agreement
Parties: 
    Great White Fleet (``GWF'')
    Dole Ocean Cargo Express, Inc. (``Dole'')
Synopsis: The proposed Agreement would permit Dole to charter space to 
GWF in the trade between Freeport, Texas, and inland U.S. points via 
Freeport, and ports in Guatemala and Honduras, and inland points via 
those ports.

Agreement No.: 011731
Title: FOML/Great Western Agreement.
Parties: 
    Fesco Ocean Management Ltd.
    Great Western Steamship Company.
Synopsis: The proposed agreement authorizes the parties to charter 
space to and from each other on their respective vessels operating in 
the trade between United States Pacific Coast ports and ports in the 
Far East. The parties have requested expedited review.

    Dated: October 20, 2000.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27434 Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```
#### DAUGHERTY v. BREWER.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 7, 1954.

Guy K. Duerson, Jr., Berea, for appellant.

C. P. Moore, McKee, for appellee.

STANLEY, Commissioner.

In defense of a suit on a $400 note, Mrs. Pearl Daugherty pleaded non est factum and suretyship of her deceased husband, Lawrence Daugherty.

The only evidence that Mrs. Daugherty signed the note was the testimony of the plaintiff that after her husband’s death, she told him she had signed it. The overwhelming positive proof is that she did not sign it or authorize anyone to put her name on the note. On that issue the jury found for the plaintiff.

All the evidence is that the consideration was paid to the husband and there is no evidence that the wife received any benefit therefrom. This issue was not submitted to the jury. By the mandatory statute, a wife signing a note as surety for her husband is not liable for its payment. KRS 404.010(2). Where the husband negotiated the loan and received all the consideration, the wife is but a surety. Oatts v. First National Bank of Somerset, 244 Ky. 635, 51 S.W.2d 952. The trial court should have directed a verdict for the defendant on this ground.

The appeal is granted and the judgment is

Reversed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofBelk, Inc. (the “Corporation”) for the fiscal yearended January 29, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, the Executive Vice President, Finance of theCorporation, certifies that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Corporation.     /s/ Brian T. Marley           Brian T. Marley *Executive Vice President, Finance* *(Chief Financial Officer)*April 14, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing
Owner), of World Monitor Trust  Series B (Series B), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Bs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series B.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley                          
|Maureen D. Howley                              
|Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President
|March 30, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2330

YORDANOS GHIRMAZION, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A78-612-251 ) Submitted: March 31, 2004 Decided: April 14, 2004 Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aragaw Mehari, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Emily Radford, Assistant Director, David T. Shapiro, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Ghirmazion does not challenge the immigration judge’s denial of her applications for withholding from removal or withholding under the Convention Against Torture. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Yordanos Ghirmazion, a native of Ethiopia and a citizen of Eritrea, seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s denial of her application for asylum, withholding from removal and withholding under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the administrative record and the immigration judge’s decision, designated by the Board as the final agency determination, and find that substantial evidence supports the immigration judge’s conclusion that Ghirmazion failed to establish the past persecution or well-founded fear of future persecution necessary to establish eligibility for asylum. See8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2003) (stating that the burden of proof is on the alien to establish eligibility for asylum); INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (same). We will reverse the Board only if the evidence “‘was so compelling that no reasonable fact finder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.’” Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 325 n.14 (4th Cir. 2002) (quoting Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. at 483-84). We find the evidence does not compel a different conclusion. * We deny Ghirmazion’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are- 3 - adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit
32.1





Statement
of Chief Executive Officer Furnished


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned, Kim S. Price, is the
President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the
“Company”).





This statement is being furnished in
connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”).





By execution of this statement, I
certify that:





A)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))
      and





B)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
  Report.





March 16, 2009
              
              /s/ Kim S. PriceDated
              
              Kim
      S. PricePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer





This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
#### POPE v. STATE.

No. 26134.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 17, 1952.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for the sale of liquor in a dry area. Appellant '.having waived trial by jury, the court found him guilty as charged and assessed his punishment at 60 days in jail.

The proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for the consideration of this court, there being no statement of facts nor bills of exception brought forward in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.