alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 204 (Friday, October 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27027]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NM-952-01-1420-BJ]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; New Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey described below are scheduled to be 
officially filed in the New Mexico State Office, Bureau of Land 
Management, Santa Fe, New Mexico, (30) thirty calendar days from the 
date of this publication.

Indian Meridian, Oklahoma

T. 6 N., R. 14 E., approved September 28, 2000, for Group 68 OK;
T. 6 N., R. 14 E., approved September 28, 2000, for Group 68 OK;
T. 10 S., R. 21 W., approved September 19, 2000, Supplemental Plat;
Amended Protraction Diagrams for Tps. 7-12 S., R. 21 W., approved 
May 4, 2000;
Tps. 6 and 7 S., R. 16 W., approved August 25, 2000;
T. 13 S., R. 16 W., approved September 19, 2000;
Tps. 7, 9 and 10 S., R. 17 W., approved August 25, 2000;
Tp. 12 S., R. 15 W., approved September 19, 2000;
Tps. 13 and 14 S., R. 15 W., approved September 22, 2000;
T. 14 S., R. 12 W., approved September 19, 2000;
T. 14 S., R. 14 W., approved September 19, 2000;
Tps. 12 and 13 S., R. 14 W., approved September 22, 2000;
Tps. 32 and 33 S., R. 22 W., approved September 28, 2000.

    Filed on the date of this letter are the following surveys:

T. 8 S., R. 12 W., approved July 19, 2000, for Group 967 NM; and
T. 17 N., R. 9 E., approved August 25, 2000, Supplemental Plat.

    If a protest against a survey, as shown on any of the above plats 
is received prior to the date of official filing, the filing will be 
stayed pending consideration of the protest. A plat will not be 
officially filed until the day after all protests have been dismissed 
and become final or appeals from the dismissal affirmed.
    A person or party who wishes to protest against any of these 
surveys must file a written protest with the NM State Director, Bureau 
of Land Management, stating that they wish to protest.
    A statement of reasons for a protest may be filed with the notice 
of protest to the State Director, or the statement of reasons must be 
filed with the State Director within thirty (30) days after the protest 
is filed. The above-listed plats represent dependent resurveys, 
surveys, and subdivisions.
    These plats will be available for inspection in the New Mexico 
State Office, Bureau of Land Management, P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New 
Mexico, 87502-0115. Copies may be obtained from this office upon 
payment of $1.10 per sheet.

    Dated: October 12, 2000.
John P. Bennett,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 00-27027 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 31

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marlton Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert
B. Ginsburg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen P. Rolf, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on their
knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert B. Ginsburg                             /s/ Stephen P. Rolf
----------------------                             -------------------
Robert B. Ginsburg                                 Stephen P. Rolf

Chief Executive Officer                            Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2003                                  November 14, 2003



                                       55
Exhibit 21 SUBSIDIARIES
OF THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY As of February 28, 2006, ServiceMaster had the following subsidiaries: Subsidiary
  
  State or
  Country of
  Incorporationor
  OrganizationServiceMaster Consumer
  Services Limited Partnership
  
  DelawareServiceMaster Consumer
  Services, Inc.
  
  DelawareTruGreen Limited
  Partnership
  
  DelawareTruGreen, Inc.
  
  DelawareServiceMaster International
  Holdings, Inc.
  
  DelawareGreenLawn, Ltd
  
  CanadaTruGreen LandCare L.L.C. 1
  
  DelawareTruGreen Companies L.L.C.
  
  DelawareThe Terminix International
  Company Limited Partnership
  
  DelawareTerminix International,
  Inc.
  
  DelawareServiceMaster
  Residential/Commercial Services Limited Partnership
  
  DelawareSM Clean L.L.C.
  
  DelawareMerry Maids Limited
  Partnership
  
  DelawareMM Maids L.L.C.
  
  DelawareAmerican Home Shield
  Corporation 2
  
  DelawareAmeriSpec, Inc.
  
  DelawareFurniture Medic Limited
  Partnership
  
  DelawareFM Medic L.L.C.
  
  DelawareAmerican Residential
  Services L.L.C.
  
  DelawareARS American Residential
  Services of California, Inc.3
  
  CaliforniaServiceMaster Aviation
  L.L.C.
  
  IllinoisThe ServiceMaster
  Acceptance Company Limited Partnership
  
  DelawareServiceMaster Acceptance
  Corporation
  
  DelawareServiceMaster Holding
  Corporation
  
  DelawareServiceMaster BSC L.L.C.
  
  DelawareServiceMaster Funding
  Company L.L.C.
  
  DelawareServiceMaster Management
  Corporation
  
  DelawareSteward Insurance Company
  
  Vermont   1
  TruGreen LandCare L.L.C.
  has 9 subsidiaries.2
  American Home Shield
  Corporation has 14 subsidiaries, including AmeriSpec, Inc.3
  ARS American
  Residential Services of California, Inc. has 12 subsidiaries.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,547
<SECURITIES>                                    90,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  245,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    112,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               511,237
<PP&E>                                         449,108
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,288,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,398,835
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       119,706
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,230,007)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,288,534
<SALES>                                      1,821,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,821,009
<CGS>                                          214,587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,776,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,705
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,705
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,705
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001051885
<NAME> SCOVILL FASTENERS
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             293
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,132
<INVENTORY>                                     24,573
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,757
<PP&E>                                          77,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 217,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,068
<BONDS>                                        137,793
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   217,267
<SALES>                                         92,476
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,476
<CGS>                                           68,112
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,954
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   677
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,965
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,623)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (4,744)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,879)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,879)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-60207) pertaining to the UDLP Amended and Restated Supplemental
Retirement and Savings Plan, the United Defense Stock Option Plan, and the
United Defense Industries, Inc. Employee Equity Purchase Plan of our report
dated February 1, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
United Defense Industries, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for
the year ended December 31, 2000.


                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


McLean, VA
December 6, 2001
#### NOLTE et al. v. HOPKINS et al.

No. 11848.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 16, 1948.

■ Neil E. Beaton and Forrest A. Bennett, both of San Antonio, for appellants.

Walter Groce, of San Antonio, Enoch Fletcher, of Grand Saline and Harry Berry, of San Antonio, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This suit was instituted by George C. Hopkins, individually and as chairman of the State Executive Committee of the Republican Party of Texas, and by W. C. Briggs and Hobart K. McDowell, individually and as members of the State Executive Committee of the Republican Party of Texas, and by amended pleading John J. Fogarty was made plaintiff in his capacity as County Chairman of the Republican Party of Crockett County, Texas, against Eugene Nolte, Jr., also known as Mike Nolte, R. B. Creager, Lena Gay More, Mrs. Carl W. Stearns, L. J. Beukenstein, Marrs McLean, and John Roy Black, who are members of the Headquarters 'Committee of the Republican Party of Texas, seeking to restrain the defendants from, among other things, filling vacancies in certain offices of County Chairmen of the Republican Party of various counties in Texas.

This is an appeal from an order granting a temporary injunction so restraining the defendants, who constitute a majority of the Headquarters Committee.

This injunction was sought, allegedly, for the purpose of preventing confusion at the Republican Party Precinct Conventions to be held on May 1, 1948, and the Republican County Convention to be held on May 4, 1948, and the State Convention to be held on May 24, 1948. It is a matter of common knowledge that all of these conventions were held upon the days alleged and that this -temporary injunction cannot now serve the purpose for which it was sought. The questions here presented are now moot. Appellees have suggested the mootness of the case and that it be dismissed.

Appellants suggest that- the order granting the temporary injunction should be reversed and the petition dismissed for the reasons pointed out in their brief. Whether we agree with appellants or appellees, we come to the same disposition of this *886cause, so we see no use for any further discussion of the same.

On the ground of • moótness, the order granting the temporary injunction will be reversed and the petition dismissed at the cost of appellants.
Opinion issued January 11, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-01152-CV

———————————

IN RE DARRYL W. RISER, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Darryl W. Riser, proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus, seeking relief from the trial court’s order denying his “motion to 
2

disqualify and recuse” respondent1from hearing proceedings in the underlying 

suit.2 

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. All pending motions are 

dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes and Higley.

 

1 Respondent is the Honorable Dan Hinde, Presiding Judge of the 269th District 

Court, Harris County, Texas.

2 The underlying case is Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee v. Darryl W. 

Riser, No. 2011-16783, 269th Dist. Court (Harris Cnty., Tex.).
[ex9912002.gif]



CONSENT OF MCDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.







The Board of Directors

Paramount Energy Operating Corp., as Administrator of

Paramount Energy Trust





We hereby consent to the reference to us in the registration statement on Form 40-F of Paramount Energy Trust and to the incorporation by reference therein of our reports dated January 30, 2007.





McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd.









signed by P. A. Welch

________________________________

P. A. Welch, P. Eng.

President & Managing Director



March 13, 2007

Calgary, Alberta







2200, Bow Valley Square 3, 255  5 Avenue SW, Calgary AB  T2P 3G6   Tel: (403) 262-5506   Fax: (403) 233-2744

www.mcdan.com
exv10w17



 








Exhibit 10.17




September 27, 1996




David Lidsky




Re:
Employment Terms




Dear Mr. Lidsky:



Berkeley Integrated Technologies, Inc. is pleased to offer you the position of Design Engineer, on
the following terms.



You will be responsible for product and technology development. You will work at our facility
located at 2201 Broadway, Oakland, CA. Of course, Berkeley Integrated Technologies, Inc. may change
your position, duties, and work location from time to time as it deems necessary.



Your compensation will be $3,000 per month, less payroll deductions and all required withholdings.
$1,800 per month of your compensation will be deferred until September 27, 1997. You will be paid
monthly and you will be eligible for the following standard Company benefits as plans are
established by the company: medical insurance, vacation, sick leave, holidays. Details about these
benefit plans will be made available for your review. Berkeley Integrated Technologies, Inc. may
modify compensation and benefits from time to time as it deems necessary.



As a Berkeley Integrated Technologies, Inc. employee, you will be expected to abide by Company
rules and regulations, and sign and comply with a Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement
which prohibits unauthorized use or disclosure of Berkeley Integrated Technologies, Inc.
proprietary information.



Normal working hours are from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. As an exempt salaried
employee, you will be expected to work additional hours as required by the nature of your work
assignments.



You may terminate your employment with Berkeley Integrated Technologies, Inc. at any time and for
any reason whatsoever simply by notifying Berkeley Integrated Technologies, Inc. Likewise, Berkeley
Integrated Technologies, Inc. may terminate your employment at any time and for any reason
whatsoever, with or without cause or advance notice. This at-will employment relationship cannot be
changed except in a writing signed by a Company officer.














 





The
employment terms in this letter supersede any other agreements or promises made to you by
anyone, whether oral or written. As required by law, this offer is subject to satisfactory proof of
your right to work in the United States.



Please sign and date this letter, and return it to me if you wish to accept employment at Berkeley
Integrated Technologies, Inc. under the terms described above.



We look forward to your favorable reply and to a productive and enjoyable work relationship.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Sincerely,

 	 
	/s/ Greg Hildebrand
 	 
	Greg Hildebrand 	 
	 	 	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	Accepted:

 	 
	/s/ Dave Lidsky
 	 
	Dave Lidsky 	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	9/27/96
 	 
	Date
#### HILLSBORO NEWS COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, Putt-Hut, Inc., a Florida Corporation d/b/a Little Professor Book Center; and Charles Putt, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF TAMPA, a Florida Municipal Corporation, William Poe, Individually and as Mayor of the City of Tampa, Charles Otero, Individually and as Chief of Police of the City of Tampa, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 75-2315.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 3, 1977.

*861Henry E. Williams, Jr., City Atty., Matías Blanco, Jr., Jack W. Crooks, Asst. City Attys., Tampa, Fla., for defendants-appellants.

Harold W. Mullis, Jr., Wayne Lee Thomas, Tampa, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before MORGAN and GEE, Circuit Judges, and HUNTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is not from a final judgment, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, but rather is from an order of the United States District Court, granting a preliminary injunction, 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). The issue quickly narrows: Did the trial court abuse its discretion in granting the injunction directed solely against the making of further arrests or ordering of books, magazines, or other printed material from display under the provisions of City of Tampa Ordinance No. 6115-A?

Preliminary injunctive relief is appropriate when the proponent of such relief has met the high threshold burden of proving, “(1) a substantial likelihood that [he] will prevail on the merits, (2) a substantial threat that [he] will suffer irreparable injury if the injunction is not granted, (3) that the threatened injury to [him] outweighs the threatened harm the injunction may do to the defendant, and (4) that granting the preliminary injunction will not disserve the public interest.” *Canal Authority v. Callaway,*489 F.2d 567, 572 (5th Cir. 1974); *Louisiana Environmental Society, Inc. v. Coleman,*524 F.2d 930 (5th Cir. 1975).

The district court here1 gave careful consideration to each factor and in our opinion disposed of the motion in the manner it should have been disposed of. The record completely supports his analysis and ruling.2 Accordingly, we AFFIRM.

1

. A full evidentiary hearing was held on April 4, 1975. A formal written opinion was entered on April 8, 1975.

2

. For emphasis, we expressly reiterate that the constitutionality *vel non*of the ordinance was not decided by the trial court. We disclaim any intent to indicate or intimate what the final result will be.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2741]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Undergraduate Education; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Undergraduate Education (1214).
    Date/Time: Thursday, February 17, 2000; 8:00 am-6 pm, Rooms 830 
and 880 [Closed]. Friday, February 18, 2000; 8:00 am-2:00 pm, Room 
830 and 880 [Closed]. Friday, February 18, 2000; 2:00-3:30 pm, room 
830 [Open].
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, 
VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Part Open (see Agenda, below).
    Contact Person: Dr. Herbert Levitan, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 
306-1681.
    Purpose of Meeting: To carry out a Committee of Visitors (COV) 
review of the CCLI and ATE programs over the past three fiscal 
years, including program evaluation, examination of decisions on 
proposals, reviewer comments, and to access other privileged 
information.
    Agenda: February 17, 2000, 8:00 am-6:00 pm, Closed review of 
privileged documents. February 18, 2000, 8:00 am-2 pm. Closed review 
of privileged documents. February 18, 2:00 pm-3:30 pm, Open 
discussion on the impact of the projects funded and an evaluation of 
the programs. Session is open to meet requirements of Government 
Performance and Results Act (GPRA).
    Reason for Closing: During the closed session, the COV will be 
reviewing proposals which include information of a proprietary or 
confidential nature, including technical information; financial data 
such as salaries, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 
U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 1, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-2741 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M