### Page 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Among the U.S. Department of Agriculture, The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , and the U.S. Department of the Army

Concerning Implementation of the 404(f)(1)(A) Exemption for Certain Agricultural Conser vation Practice Standards

I. Purpose and Scope

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) a nd the Department of the Army (the Army) issued, in March 2014, an interp retive rule clarifying the appli cability of the exemption from Clean Water Act (CWA) section 404 permitting provided by CWA section 404(f)(1)(A) for discharges to waters of the United States associ ated with certain conservation practice standards where they are undertaken as part of an estab lished farming operation. This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) describes how the three agen cies will work together to implement the interpretive rule, to protect and enhance water qu ality and ensure consistency and predictability for the public. This MOU also identifies the proce dures for coordinating to maintain the list of conservation practice standards exempt from section 404 permitting, including revisions to the

list. This list is included as Attachment A to this MOU.

II. Authorities

EPA and the Army enter into this MOU pursuant to their responsibilities and authorities under the Clean Water Act, and specifica lly section 404. 33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq. NRCS enters into this MOU pursuant to its responsibilities a nd authorities under th e Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act. 16 U.S.C. §590 a-f.

III. Background

CWA section 404(f) provides that the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the

United States in connection with certain activ ities is exempt from CWA section 404 permitting requirements. These activities include “normal fa rming, silviculture, and ranching activities such as plowing, seeding, cultivating, minor drainage , harvesting for the production of food, fiber and forest products, or upland soil and water cons ervation practices.” CWA section 404(f)(1)(A).

EPA and the Army issued, in March 2014, an in terpretive rule clarifyi ng that certain NRCS conservation practice standards designed and impl emented to protect and enhance water quality

### Page 2 are considered “normal farming” activities when conducted as part of an established farming operation, and are discharges therefore exem pt under CWA section 404(f)(1)(A) from CWA section 404 permitting requirements. The CWA s ection 404(f) exemptions also have been previously addressed by agency regulati ons. 40 C.F.R. §232.3; 33 C.F.R. §323.4. The interpretive rule does not change the agencies ’ regulations, including those addressing CWA section 404(f)(2) 1



### .

NRCS works with partners and private landowne rs and managers on conservation planning and assistance designed to result in productive lands and healthy ecosystems. The foundation for this

assistance is science-based conservation practice standard s that guide the design and implementation of measures to address natural resource concerns, includ ing water quality and quantity. These standards provide technical requirements, which are tailored to state and local conditions and provide specifications for installa tion of conservation measures. NRCS worked with the EPA and the Army to evaluate its list of conservation practice standards and identify those designed and implemented to protect a nd enhance water quality when implemented in

waters of the United States.

The NRCS conservation practices standards considered as of the date of this MOU to be “normal farming” when conducted as part of an ongoing operation and thus exempt from permitting under CWA section 404(f)(1)(A) are listed in Attachment A to this MOU. Note that the agencies expect this list to evolve over time as NRCS modifies or deve lops new conservation practice standards. The agencies intend periodically to update the li st consistent with section V.

of this MOU.

IV. Agricultural Conservation Practice Standards Considered Exempt as “Normal Farming” under CWA §404(f)(1)(A).

The Army, the EPA, and NRCS have examined NRCS’ conservation practice standards, and identified those being designed and implemented to protect and enhance water quality that, when they involve a discharge of dredged or fill mate rial to waters of the United States and are conducted as part of an ongoing farming opera tion, are exempt from permitting under CWA section 404(f)(1)(A). The current list of identified conservati on practice standards that are exempt can be found on the EPA’s website at http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/gui dance/wetlands/agriculture.cfm

. EPA will update the list on its website to reflect any future changes made as a re sult of the process in Section V. below. The agencies agree that the list on EPA’s website wi ll guide their implementation of the interpretive rule. Details regarding conservation practice standards are available on NRCS’ website at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detailfull/national/technical/cp/ncps/?cid=nrcs143_02

6849

1 CWA Section 404(f)(2) is the so-calle d “recapture” provision. Section 404(f )(2) requires that activities are not exempt where they have certain effects on waters, including wetlands. For example, a proposed discharge to waters of the U.S. is not exempt where it is associated with an activity that would convert waters to non-waters.

### Page 3 V. Management of the List of Exempt Practice Standards

NRCS reviews its existing conser vation practice standard s every five years on a rolling schedule, and through a public process, modifying the pr actice standards where appropriate, and also develops new conservation pract ice standards as needed. The agencies will manage the list of NRCS conservation practice standards considered as “normal farming,” as needed. Revisions may become necessary because, for example, NRCS has modified an existing conservation practice standa rd to enhance its water quality benefits in a way that makes it appropriate for the agencies to add the conservation practice standard to the list of those considered as “normal farming.” Si milarly, it may be appropriate to remove a conservation practice standard from the list if the agencies observe implementation of the practice standard is not resulting in anticipated water quality benefits.

The Army, the EPA, and NRCS intend to meet a nd discuss appropriate ch anges to the list of practice standards exempt from permitting at a frequency agreed upon by the agencies, but at least annually. The discussion will consider potential addi tion to this list of practice standards of

new or revised NRCS conserva tion practice standards as we ll as potential deletion of conservation practice standards based on available data regarding water quality effects or other relevant implementation information. To ensure effective implementatio n of the interpretive rule, the agencies will regularly share information, as appropriate, regarding the use of exempt conservation practices in aquatic areas. The agencies will reach out to other interested entities, including states, as the list of exem pt practices is re gularly reviewed.

The agencies will coordinate to seek consensus on any modifications to the list of exempted agricultural conservation practice st andards, consistent with agency responsibilities established under Federal statutes and regulations.

VI. Other Roles and Responsibilities

A. Working with Landowners and Land Managers -- NRCS retains the primary federal role of working with landowners and land managers , state agencies, privat e organizations, etc., regarding the use of conservation practices. Wher e NRCS is the technical assistance provider, the agency has the responsibility to appropriate ly identify and implement conservation practices in a manner consistent with the applicable conservation practice standards. Landowners not relying on NRCS for technical a ssistance have the res ponsibility to ensure that implementation of the conservation practice is in accordance w ith the applicable NRCS conservation practice standard. It is important to emphasize that practices are exempt only where they meet conservation practice standards.

B. Applicability of the Exemption to a Particul ar Project-- Discharges in waters of the U.S. are exempt only when they are conducted in accordance with NRCS practice standards. Landowners are not required, howev er, to obtain preapproval fr om the Corps or EPA for the exemption to apply to implementation of a practi ce standard identified in the list of exempt practices. Where NRCS is supplying the techni cal assistance for a pa rticular conservation activity, the agency has the lead responsibility to work with landow ners and managers to ensure that practices are applied in accordance with standa rds and to address and correct issues that may

### Page 4 arise regarding the consistency of a particular project with conservation practice standards. Where NRCS is not providing t echnical assistance, the landow ner has the responsibility to ensure that implementation of the conservation practice is in accordance with the applicable NRCS conservation practice standard. Even where NRCS is not providing technical assistance, the agency plays an important role in helping to respond to issues th at may arise regarding project specific conformance with conservation practice standards. EPA and the Corps are responsible for responding to proj ect specific issues that may ar ise associated with compliance with section 404(f), including concer ns that are raised by states or federally recognized tribes.

C. Development of New Conservation Pract ice Standards -- NRCS remains solely responsible under its authority for developing ag ricultural conservation practice standards. However, if NRCS anticipates a new or modified practice standard could be a candidate for the list of “normal farming” practices exempt from permitting, NRCS will coordinate with the Army and the EPA as the conservation pr actice standard is being develope d to help facilitate agreement among the agencies to add the prac tice to the list of conservation practice standard s exempt from permitting as described in section V above.

D. Outreach and Training -- Although the inte rpretive rule is effective immediately, Headquarters offices will work with field offi ces to educate and train their staffs on the implementation of the interpretive rule. The agencies will use their best efforts to accomplish this education and training in the most effici ent and timely manner. To the extent funds and staffing allow, the three agencies will work toge ther to develop any fact sheets, bulletins, and webinars for agencies’ staff and agricultural producers, explaining the CWA section 404(f) exemption, the March 2014 interpretive rule and its application to conservation practice standards. Where appropriate and feasible, the agencies will conduct joint training on these provisions.

E. CWA Responsibilities -- Nothing in this M OU affects the authorities of the EPA, Army, or authorized states, or federally recognized tribes to implement or enforce CWA provisions.

VII. Additional Provisions

A. The policies and procedures contained within this MOU do not create any rights, either substantive or procedural, enforceable by any party regarding an enforcement action brought by

the United States. Deviation or variance from the administrative procedures included in this

MOU will not constitute a defense for violators or others concerned with any Section 404 action.

B. This MOU does not create any right, benef it, or trust responsibility, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or equity, by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any person.

C. Nothing in this MOU is intended to diminis h, modify, or otherwise affect statutory or regulatory authorities of any of the signatory agencies. The agencies will handle their own

activities and utili ze their own resources, including the expenditure of their own funds, in pursuing these objectives. Each agency will carry out its separate activities in a coordinated and mutually beneficial manner.D. As required by the Antidefic iency Act

, 31 U.S.C. 1341 and 1342

, all commitmen ts made
by the EPA

, NRCS or the Army in this MOU are subject to the availability of appropriated funds

and budget priorities. Nothing in this MOU, in and of itself, obligates the EPA, NRCS or the Army to expend appropriations or to enter into any contract, assistance agreement

, interagency

agreement, or incur other financial obligations. Any activities that involve the transfer of funds

, services, or property among the agencies will requi r e execution of separate agreements and be
contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds. Such activities must be independently

authorized by appropriate statutory authority. This MOU does not provide such authority.
Negotiation

, execution

, and administration of each such agreement must comply with all applicable statutes and regulations.



### VIII. Effective date and Modification of the MOU

A. This MOU will take effect on the date of the last signature below and will continue in

effect until modified or revoked by agreement of all signatory agencies

, or until revoked by any
of the signatory agencies alone upon 90 days written notice.

B. Modifications of this MOU may be made by mutual agreement and Headquarters-level approval by all the signatory agencies. Such modifications will take effect thirty (30) days from

t he last signature of the modified document by all the s i gnatory agencies.

Robert Bonnie

Under Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Nancy K. Sto e r Acting Assist nt Administrator for Wate r
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

- lien Darcy

As istant Secretary (Civi l W

U

.. Department of the Arm 

## MAR 2 5 2Gi4

Page 5

### Page 6 Attachment A

NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARDS

EXEMPT FROM PERMITTING UNDER CL EAN WATER ACT SECTION 404(f)(1)(A)

Practice # Practice Name Creation

Date

314 Brush Management Sep

‐ 09

315 Herbaceous Weed control Apr

‐ 10

320 Irrigation Canal or Lateral Sep

‐ 10

326 Clearing and Snagging Jul

‐ 10

327 Conservation Cover Sep

‐ 10

338 Prescribed Burning Sep

‐ 10

342 Critical Area Planting Dec

‐ 13

353 Monitoring Well Sep

‐ 10

380 Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment May

‐ 11

382 Fence Apr

‐ 13

383 Fuel Break Apr

‐ 05

386 Field Border Dec

‐ 13

388 Irrigation Field Ditch Apr

‐ 11

390 Riparian Herbaceous Cover Sep

‐ 10

391 Riparian Forest buffer Jul

‐ 10

393 Filter Strip Dec ‐ 13

394 Firebreak Sep

‐ 10

395 Stream Habitat Improvement and Management Sep

‐ 10

396 Aquatic Organism passage Apr

‐ 11

398 Fish Raceway or Tank Sep

‐ 09

399 Fishpond Management Sep

‐ 11

400 Bivalve Aquaculture Gear and Biofouling Control Apr

‐ 11 Notes

412 Grassed Waterway Apr

‐ 10 activities that convert waters to

non

‐ waters are not exempt

422 Hedgerow Planting Sep

‐ 10

423 Hillside Ditch May

‐ 08

453 Land Reclamation, Landslide Treatment Feb

‐ 05

455 Land Reclamation, Toxic Discharge Control May

‐ 05

460 Land Clearing Sep

‐ 11

484 Mulching May

‐ 11

490 Tree/Shrub Site Preparation Jan

‐ 06

500 Obstruction Removal Jan

‐ 10

511 Forage Harvest Management Apr

‐ 10

### Page 7 512 Forage and Biomass Planting Jan

‐ 10

528 Prescribed Grazing Sep

‐ 10

533 Pumping Plant May

‐ 11

543 Land Reclamation, Abandoned Mined Land Aug

‐ 06

544 Land Reclamation, Currently Mined Land Aug

‐ 06

548 Grazing Land Mechanical Treatment Sep

‐ 10 chiseling or deep ripping in

wetlands is not exempt

550 Range Planting Apr

‐ 10

568 Trails and Walkways Jan

‐ 10

575 Animal Trails and Walkways Apr

‐ 10

578 Stream Crossing Sep

‐ 11

587 Structure for Water Control Apr

‐ 10

601 Vegetative Barrier Jan

‐ 10

612 Tree/Shrub Establishment May

‐ 11

643 Restoration and Management of Rare and

Declining Habitats Sep

‐ 10

644 Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management Sep

‐ 10

646 Shallow Water Development and Management Sep

‐ 10

647 Early Successional Habitat Development /

Management Sep

‐ 10

650 Windbreak/Shelterbelt Renovation Jul

‐ 10

654 Road/Trail/Landing Closure and Treatment Nov

‐ 08

655 Forest Trails and Landings Sep

‐ 11

657 Wetland Restoration Sep

‐ 10

659 Wetland Enhancement Sep

‐ 10

660 Tree/Shrub Pruning Jan

‐ 06

666 Forest Stand Improvement May

‐ 11