alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3271 

Making continuing appropriations for the compensation of Federal employees 

and certain military personnel in the event of a Government shutdown, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 7, 2013 

Mr. LAMBORN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight 

and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

Making continuing appropriations for the compensation of 

Federal employees and certain military personnel in the 

event of a Government shutdown, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military and Federal 

5 Civilian Employee Pay Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 3271 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FEDERAL EM2 PLOYEES AND CERTAIN MILITARY PER3 SONNEL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—There are hereby appropriated for 

5 fiscal year 2014, out of any money in the Treasury not 

6 otherwise appropriated, for any period during which in7 terim or full-year appropriations for fiscal year 2014 are 

8 not in effect such sums as are necessary to provide the 

9 pay and allowances for— 

10 (1) Federal employees; 

11 (2) members of the reserve components of the 

12 Armed Forces (as named in section 10101 of title 

13 10, United States Code) who perform inactive-duty 

14 training (as defined in section 101(d)(7) of such 

15 title) during such period; 

16 (3) the commissioned corps of the Public 

17 Health Service; and 

18 (4) the commissioned corps of the National 

19 Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 

20 (b) BACK PAY FOR FURLOUGHED INDIVIDUALS.— 

21 Any individual who will receive pay and allowances under 

22 subsection (a) but who was furloughed as a result of any 

23 lapse in appropriations which begins on or about October 

24 1, 2013, and ending on the date of enactment of this Act 

25 shall be compensated at their standard rate of compensamstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 3271 IH

1 tion, for the period of such lapse in appropriations, as soon 

2 as practicable after such lapse in appropriations ends. 

3 SEC. 3. RECONCILIATION OF EXPENDITURES. 

4 Expenditures made pursuant to this Act shall be 

5 charged to the applicable appropriation, fund, or author6 ization whenever a bill in which such applicable appropria7 tion, fund, or authorization is contained is enacted into 

8 law. 

9 SEC. 4. TERMINATION. 

10 No part of any appropriation contained in this Act 

11 shall remain available for obligation beyond September 30, 

12 2014. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### RUI.E 18 - **CC!WITID;~AL**

### APFHOVIU. 

## ( a. The AirPollutio:t Control Officermay issue 

### ar. a.utl:ority to ccn- \ ctruct 

### or a 

### permit tc 

### operate, subject 

### to conditions\o:hich •:ill
**brin~** 

### the ·operation of

**~.ny** 

### o.rt:i.cle, l!l:lChine, **equip::~ent** 

### or other **ccntriY~::ce** lr:itain the 

### standards ofRule 171 in 

### which case tiu: 

### conditions shrill be **sp~cifigc!** in 

### -..·ritine. Cor..tJencinG

**~1crk** I.Ulde::r such an **authori~y** 

### to c:::n;;truct or opo:!rat.ion 

### lir.c!cr Et:ch a pcrc:it to oper.:;.

### te s;;,·ll be 

### c!ec:.cd **ncc~ptano;c** of 

### all

**ti;·~ c~m**  a\<tborit;r t.c **cc~Et!·u:.:t** or a 

### p::!rc;it to **opc:-tot~ •:i~h**  re;h:cd ce>::dilion!.: upo:1 

### receipt ofa ne• application, if 

### the applicant der.;onstr.:;.tes that t!:e article, m.:>chine, 

### equipment cr 

### other contrivance .::a.'1 **op~race ~o.·it.hin**  the 

### standards of ]ule 17
**~der** 

### the revisedconditions.



# (
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63


OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE











I, Andrew Stewart, the President, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer of Man Investments (USA) Corp., the general partner of Man-AHL Diversified I L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Annual Report of the Partnership on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




Date: March 31, 2010





/s/ Andrew Stewart


Andrew Stewart


President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          94,517
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         230,746
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               114,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,571,764
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        916,167
<ALLOWANCE>                                     17,914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,550,718
<DEPOSITS>                                     935,041
<SHORT-TERM>                                   662,888
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            329,777
<LONG-TERM>                                    972,911
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,010
<COMMON>                                           258
<OTHER-SE>                                     548,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,532,356
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 46,454
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               26,857
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                73,311
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              36,249
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,295
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,767
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   33,961
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  32
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                264,373
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                397,328
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     397,328
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   418,787
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.04
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     .64
<LOANS-NON>                                     33,691
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               137,773
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   39,153
<RECOVERIES>                                     3,753
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               17,914
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            14,180
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,734
        

</TABLE>
#### RYHERD v. CARTER, Judge et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 19, 1951.

*603J. Wood Vance, Jr., Vance & Vance, Glasgow, for petitioner.

Abe Carter, Tompkinsville, for respondents.

WADDILL, Commissioner.

This Court has previously granted the petitioner, Vol Ryherd a temporary writ of prohibition against the respondents, J. C. Carter, Jr., Judge of the Monroe Circuit Court and Mrs. Jessie Harlin, its Master Commissioner, from proceeding further in the case styled, Herman Ryherd et al., v. Vol Ryherd, now pending in the Monroe Circuit Court. The issuance of a temporary writ of this nature was permitted to meet the apparent exigencies of the case. Respondents have filed answer within the time allowed by the court’s order. The cause is now before us to determine whether the writ should be made permanent or be dissolved.

The petition and response filed herein reflects that petitioner and others 'are defendants in an action pending in the Monroe Circuit Court styled Herman Ryherd et al. v. Vol Ryherd et al., wherein the plaintiffs, Herman and Guy Ryherd, seek to sell certain real estate for the purpose of a division of the proceeds of sale, which they claim is property jointly owned by themselves, Vol Ryherd, and others. It is conceded that summons was duly executed upon Vol Ryherd in that action and that he was served with notices regarding the taking of depositions in the case. Vol Ry-herd did not file answer, nor did he appear and make defense.

About one year later the court rendered judgment ordering a sale of the property for the purpose of a division of the proceeds of sale, directing its master commissioner to sell the property according to law. After the property was advertised for sale by the master commissioner, Vol Ryherd filed in this Court a petition for temporary and permanent writ of prohibition.

This Court has held that it will grant a writ of prohibition under Section 110 of the Constitution, only when an inferior court is acting without jurisdiction or is acting within its jurisdiction but erroneously, and in such a manner that great and irreparable injury will follow therefrom, and the petitioner is without adequate remedy. Jones v. Tartar, 308 Ky. 813, 215 S.W.2d 955; Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Murphy, Judge., 314 Ky. 309, 234 S.W.2d 969; Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Crowder, Judge, 292 Ky. 140, 166 S.W.2d 274.

The allegations of the petition and the response thereto, concern the merits of the suit pending in the circuit court. The fact that petitioner failed to file answer and make defense to the suit seeking a sale of his alleged property, does not state sufficient grounds upon which this Court could issue the permanent writ. Petitioner has an adequate remedy iby appealing if any wrong has been done him.

It is therefore ordered that the temporary writ of prohibition granted by this Court be and the same is dissolved; and the application that the writ of prohibition be made permanent, is denied, and the petition is dismissed at petitioner’s costs. .
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3134 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3134

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow charitable 
  contributions made by an individual after the close of the taxable 
year, but before the tax return due date, to be treated as made in such 
                             taxable year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 19, 2013

  Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow charitable 
  contributions made by an individual after the close of the taxable 
year, but before the tax return due date, to be treated as made in such 
                             taxable year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Charitable Giving Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MAKING CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 170 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) 
as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively, and by inserting after 
paragraph (1) the following new paragraph:
            ``(2) Treatment of charitable contributions made by 
        individuals before due date of return.--If any charitable 
        contribution is made by an individual after the close of a 
        taxable year but not later than the due date (determined 
        without regard to extensions) for the return of tax for such 
        taxable year, then the taxpayer may elect to treat such 
        charitable contribution as made in such taxable year. Such 
        election may be made only at the time of the filing of such 
        return of tax and shall be signified in such manner as the 
        Secretary may provide.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to contributions made in taxable years beginning after December 
31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                                ENERGYSOUTH, INC.


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



<Table>
<Caption>
                                                         Percent of Voting                       State of
           Subsidiary                                    Securities Owned                      Incorporation
           ----------                                    -----------------                     -------------
<S>                                                      <C>                                   <C>
Mobile Gas Service Corporation                                 100%                               Alabama

MGS Storage Services, Inc.                                     100%                               Alabama

EnergySouth Services, Inc.                                     100%                               Alabama

MGS Marketing Services, Inc.                                   100%                               Alabama
</Table>



                PARTNERSHIPS IN WHICH REGISTRANT OWNS AN INTEREST



<Table>
<Caption>
           Partnership                                   Equity Ownership
           -----------                                   ----------------
<S>                                                      <C>
Bay Gas Storage Company, Ltd.                                 90.9%

Southern Gas Transmission Co.                                   51%
</Table>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3005 

To amend chapter V of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

permit the sale of, and access to, ‘‘research use only’’ products in diagnostic tests. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2013 

Mr. BURGESS (for himself and Ms. SPEIER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend chapter V of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to permit the sale of, and access to, ‘‘research 

use only’’ products in diagnostic tests. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medical Testing Avail5 ability Act of 2013’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3005 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION REGARDING RESEARCH USE ONLY 

2 PRODUCTS. 

3 Section 520 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

4 Act (21 U.S.C. 360j) is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following subsection: 

6 ‘‘(o) PRODUCTS WITH RESEARCH USE ONLY LABEL7 ING.— 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A product whose labeling 

9 bears the statement described in section 

10 809.10(c)(2)(i) of title 21, Code of Federal Regula11 tions, as in effect on the date of the enactment of 

12 this subsection, may not be deemed to be mis13 branded under this Act on the basis that the manu14 facturer or distributor of the product— 

15 ‘‘(A) sells the product to an end user who 

16 uses the product in a manner inconsistent with 

17 such statement; or 

18 ‘‘(B) engages in business communications 

19 regarding the product with an end user of the 

20 product. 

21 ‘‘(2) BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS DEFINED.— 

22 In this subsection, the term ‘business communica23 tions’, with respect to a product with labeling de24 scribed in paragraph (1)— 

25 ‘‘(A) means oral, written, or electronic con26 tact between a manufacturer or distributor of 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3005 IH

1 such product and an end user regarding the 

2 functioning of such product; and 

3 ‘‘(B) includes any such contact consisting 

4 of technical support, customer service, assist5 ance with the installation of such product, com6 munication relating to ensuring the perform7 ance of the product, and other similar contacts. 

8 ‘‘(3) SUNSET.—This subsection shall cease to 

9 be effective on the last day of the five-year period 

10 beginning on the date of enactment of this section.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2966 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to suspend, for a certain 

period, the use of adverse credit history in determining eligibility for 

Federal Direct PLUS Loans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2013 

Mr. RICHMOND (for himself, Ms. FUDGE, and Ms. BROWN of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to suspend, 

for a certain period, the use of adverse credit history 

in determining eligibility for Federal Direct PLUS 

Loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘PLUS Loan Accessi5 bility Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2966 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVISION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR FEDERAL DIRECT 

2 PLUS LOANS. 

3 Section 428B(a)(1)(A) of the Higher Education Act 

4 of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1078–2(a)(1)(A)) is amended by add5 ing before the semicolon the following: ‘‘, except that this 

6 subparagraph shall not be enforced with respect to Fed7 eral Direct PLUS Loans during the period beginning on 

8 the date of enactment of the PLUS Loan Accessibility Act 

9 and ending on the date on which the Secretary implements 

10 the final rules on the proposed rules developed by the ne11 gotiated rulemaking committee established pursuant to 

12 the announcement of intent to establish a negotiated rule13 making committee published by the Department on May 

14 1, 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 25658 et seq.)’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## NO. 12

- 20

- 00239

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF D. B. I.,

A JUVENILE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 273RD

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SHELBY COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant , D.B. I.

, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is si gned b y

Appellant and Appellant ’ s counsel. No decisi on has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly,

Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

4 2.2 (a).

Opinion delivered March 18, 2021

. Panel consisted of Worth en, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( DO NOT PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MARCH 18

, 2 021

NO. 12

- 20

- 00239

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF D. B. I., A JUVENILE

Appeal from the 273rd District Court

of Shelby County , Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 17NJ640 )

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss

the appeal herein, and the same b eing considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the ap peal be dismissed, and

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Wor then , C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3269 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3269

   Eliminating the debt ceiling for a period defined, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 2013

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   Eliminating the debt ceiling for a period defined, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fiscal Sanity Act for the National 
Debt''.

SEC. 2. NONAPPLICABILITY OF DEBT CEILING.

    Section 3101(b) of title 31, United States Code, shall not apply 
for the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and 
ending 330 days thereafter.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Circle Group Holdings, Inc. on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Gregory J.
Halpern, Chief Executive Officer of the Circle Group Holdings, Inc. certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of Circle Group Holdings, Inc.


Dated:  March 1, 2004                      /s/ GREGORY J. HALPERN
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Gregory J. Halpern
                                           Chairman of the Board, President and
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Terayon Communication Systems, Inc.
Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code I, Jerry D. Chase, the Chief Executive Officer of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. (the
Company), certify that to the best of my knowledge:  (i)
    the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K dated March 15, 2005 for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    the information contained in the said Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 15, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Jerry D. ChaseJerry D. ChaseChief Executive Officer