alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH MOSQUITO ABATEMENT 

AND RODENT CONTROL DISTRICT N0.1 

2829 Gen. Ben Davis Jr. Avenue 

Metro Airport 

Baton Rouge. Louisiana 70807 

Phone: (225) 356-3297 

US Dept. of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Jan.15,2013 

Docket number FAA-2011-0467 

{'........;: 

. Vi 

Re: Exemption no. 10821A from 14 CFR (FAR Sec)- Part 

137.53 (c)(2) 

Dear Sirs: 

We are at this time requesting to extend this 

exemption. This request was also filed electronically. 

Respectfully 

Guy M Faget 

East Baton Rouge Parish 

Mosquito and Rodent Control 
Date: 12/19/2012 

Exemption No: 10281A from 14 CFR (FAR Section)-

Part: 137.53 (c)(2) 

will expire on 6/30/2013. If appropriate, please submit 

your request to extend this exemption (including the Y-'::3- l~. 

docket number FAA-2011-0467) within 30 days ofthe~IHI': 1!1'1~~ 

date of this notice. Otherwise, the FAA may not be abl ·;:;·""~--~~~r.t....D::.: to process your request for extension before the 

expiration date. You may either submit your request 

electronically through the internet using the Docket 

Management System web site at: 

http://Regulations.gov/ or mail your request to: 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

· Submission to other locations may delay processing. 

Any request for extension must meet the 

requirements of 14 CFR part 11. If you have already 

016H26522091 

$00.32Q 

i2J ;dl20'12 

Maiied From 20591 

US POSTAGE 

requested an extension for this exemption or no longer . • . . 

need this exemption, please igno~ fhit;jiJAij~j ,jj u 1 j 11 ,l111i .ll,ulllallllllul,Jl, 11111,),1 I 

I.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         253
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  319
<ALLOWANCES>                                   66
<INVENTORY>                                    342
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               863
<PP&E>                                         55
<DEPRECIATION>                                 18
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,004
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       196  
<OTHER-SE>                                     (336)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   964  
<SALES>                                        2,176
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,176
<CGS>                                          918  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  918  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               972  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             48   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                238  
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            238  
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0 
<CHANGES>                                      0    
<NET-INCOME>                                   238   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .13    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .13    
                                                  
                                               

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the amended  Quarterly  Report of MDSI Mobile Data Solutions
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Erik Dysthe, the President,  Chief Executive  Officer,  Chairman of the Board
and Director of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                    /s/ Erik Dysthe
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Erik Dysthe
                                    President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                    Chairman of the Board and Director
                                    March 30, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


              Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-60207) pertaining to the UDLP Amended and Restated Supplemental
Retirement and Savings Plan, the United Defense Stock Option Plan, and the
United Defense Industries, Inc. Employee Equity Purchase Plan of our report
dated February 1, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
United Defense Industries, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2000.



                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

McLean, VA
March 6, 2001
exv10w16



 






Exhibit 10.16




ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT

AND NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT




     This Addendum to the Employment and Noncompetition Agreement (“Addendum”) between SCI
Executive Services, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the “Company”) and the undersigned executive of
the Company (the “Employee”), is executed as of December 1, 2005.



     The Company and the Employee have previously entered into an Employment and Noncompetition
Agreement (“Agreement”).



     This Addendum is intended to (i) supplement and modify such Agreement in order to comply with
applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, and (ii) extend the term of the
Agreement.



     This Agreement is modified effective as of December 31, 2005 as follows:




	 	1.	 	Notwithstanding the applicable provisions of this Agreement regarding timing of
distribution of payments, the following special rules shall apply in order for this
Agreement to comply with IRC §409A: (i) to the extent any distribution is to a
“specified employee” (as defined under IRC §409A) and to the extent such applicable
provisions of IRC §409A require a delay of such distributions by a six month period
after the date of such Employee’s separation of service with the Company, the
provisions of this Agreement shall be construed and interpreted as requiring a six
month delay in the commencement of such distributions thereunder, and (ii) in the event
there are any installment payments under this Agreement that are required to be delayed
by a six month period in order to comply with IRC §409A, the monthly installments that
would have been paid during such six month delay shall be accumulated and paid to the
Employee in a single lump sum within five business days after the end of such six month
delay, and (iii) the Company shall not have the discretion to prepay any installment
payments otherwise provided under this Agreement.
	 
	 	2.	 	To the extent of any compliance issues under Internal Revenue Code Section
409A, the Agreement shall be construed in such a manner so as to comply with the
requirements of such provision so as to avoid any adverse tax consequences to the
Employee.
	 
	 	3.	 	The term of the Agreement is hereby extended to December 31, 2006.





     EXECUTED as of the date first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	SCI Executive Services, Inc.	 	 	 	Employee	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	   /s/ Curtis G. Briggs
 

	 	 	 	/s/ Jeffrey E. Curtiss
 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Curtis G. Briggs
	 	 	 	Name: Jeffrey E. Curtiss	 	 
	Title:

	 	Vice President
Exhibit 31.1



Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification



I, Gary C. Loraditch, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BCSB Bancorp, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: December 21, 2005



| |  |  |  |                              
| |  |  |  | -----------------------------
| |  | 
| |  |  |  | /s/    GARY C. LORADITCH     
| |  |  |  | Gary C. Loraditch            
| |  |  |  | President                    
| |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63640-63641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27241]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Overseas Private Investment Corporation, IDCA.

ACTION: Request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to publish a Notice of the Federal 
Register notifying the public that the Agency is preparing an 
information collection request for Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) review and approval and to request public review and comment on 
the submission. Comments are being solicited on the need for the 
information, its practical utility, the accuracy of the Agency's burden 
estimate, and on ways to minimize the reporting burden, including 
automated collection techniques and uses of other forms of technology. 
The proposed information collection request under review is summarized 
below.

[[Page 63641]]


DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 26, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the survey questions and the request for review 
prepared for submission to OMB may be obtained from the Agency 
Submitting Officer. Comments on the form should be submitted to the 
Agency Submitting Officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:   
    OPIC Agency Submitting Officer: Carol Brock, Records Manager, 
Overseas Private Investment Corporation, 1100 New York Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20527, telephone (202) 336-8563.

Summary of Form Under Review

    Type of Request: New information collection.
    Title: Political Risk Insurance Survey.
    Form Number: OPIC 233.
    Frequency of Use: Once per client.
    Type of Respondents: Individual business officer representatives of 
business institutions.
    Standard Industrial Classification Codes: All.
    Description of Affected Public: U.S. companies or citizens 
investing overseas.
    Reporting Hours: 1 hour per client.
    Number of Responses: 480.
    Federal Cost: $0.
    Authority for Information Collection: Section 234A, of the Foreign 
Assistance Act of 1961, as amended.
    Abstract (Needs and Uses): OPIC is sponsoring a survey to identify 
trends relating to its clients' experiences with political risk in 
emerging markets. The survey results will not only help OPIC identify 
new products and opportunities to fulfill its mandate to insure 
investments overseas against a broad range of political risks, but will 
also provide valuable information to the political risk insurance 
industry, thereby helping the industry to enhance its programs.

    Dated: October 18, 2000.
Rumu Sarkar,
Assistant General Counsel, Department of Legal Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-27241 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-M
#### SAENZ v. SANDERS et al.

No. A-3365.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Jan. 23, 1952.

See also Tex.Civ.App., 241 S.W.2d 316.

*484G. Woodson Morris, Ronald Smallwood, Bob J. Spann, Albert U. Trevino and Sam L. Harrison, all of San Antonio, for relator.

Birkhead, Beckmann, Stanard, Vance & Wood, San Antonio*, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

At a former term we granted the motion of relator for leave to file petition for mandamus against the Honorable P. C. Sanders, District Judge, to compel him to vacate an order and to proceed to trial and judgment in a case in which relator is plaintiff and respondents M. B. Killian and R. W. Briggs are defendants. Prior to the date of submission of the application for the writ of mandamus Judge Sanders died, and that fact was made known to the court through a motion filed by respondents Killian and Briggs to dismiss the proceeding. Relator’s attorney appeared before the court to resist the motion and upon the hearing, in the exercise of its discretion, the court did not pass on the motion to dismiss, but notified relator’s attorney that if he would request Judge Walter E. Lough-ridge, the successor to Judge Sanders, to proceed to trial and judgment, and if Judge Loughridge refused to do so, he could then amend his application, and that if his amendment disclosed the fact that after being requested to do so Judge Loughridge had refused to set the case for trial, the mandamus proceeding would be considered by the court on its merits. Relator did not request Judge Loughridge to proceed but has filed an amended petition for mandamus seeking to continue this proceeding against Judge Loughridge in his official capacity.

It now appears that the case which petitioner is seeking to bring to trial is not pending in Judge Loughridge’s court, the 37th District Court, but is pending in Judge Quinn’s court, the 57th District Court. When Judge Sanders entered the order complained of retiring the case from the active docket he was acting as Presiding Judge of the District Courts of Bexar County, and in that capacity passed upon the motion in connection with the case which was pending in Judge Quinn’s court. There is no showing that the case is not still pending in Judge Quinn’s court, neither is there any allegation that Judge Lough-ridge is now the Presiding Judge of the District Courts of Bexar County. The statement is made in respondent’s brief, and not denied by relator, that Judge Quinn now fills that position. Manifestly, Judge Loughridge could not be compelled to try a case which is not pending in his court at all. This conclusion makes it unnecessary for us to consider any other ground for dismissing the proceeding.

The motion to' dismiss is granted and' the proceeding is dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.5

                      THIRD AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT

      THIS AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is entered into as
of October 1, 2005, by and between RENAISSANCE LEARNING, INC., a Wisconsin
corporation ("Borrower"), and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ("Bank").

                                    RECITALS

      WHEREAS, Borrower is currently indebted to Bank pursuant to the terms and
conditions of that certain Credit Agreement between Borrower and Bank dated as
of December 1, 2003, as amended from time to time ("Credit Agreement").

      WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower have agreed to certain changes in the terms and
conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement and have agreed to amend the Credit
Agreement to reflect said changes.

      NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree that the Credit
Agreement shall be amended as follows:

      1. Section 4.9 (a) is hereby deleted in its entirety, and the following
substituted therefor:

      "(a) Total Liabilities divided by Tangible Net Worth not greater than 0.85
to 1.0, measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter, with "Total Liabilities"
defined as the aggregate of current liabilities and non-current liabilities less
subordinated debt, and with "Tangible Net Worth" defined as the aggregate of
total stockholders' equity plus subordinated debt less any intangible assets."

      2. Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and conditions of the
Credit Agreement remain in full force and effect, without waiver or
modification. All terms defined in the Credit Agreement shall have the same
meaning when used in this Amendment. This Amendment and the Credit Agreement
shall be read together, as one document.

      3. Borrower hereby remakes all representations and warranties contained in
the Credit Agreement and reaffirms all covenants set forth therein. Borrower
further certifies that as of the date of this Amendment there exists no Event of
Default as defined in the Credit Agreement, nor any condition, act or event
which with the giving of notice or the passage of time or both would constitute
any such Event of Default.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
executed as of the day and year first written above.

                                                  WELLS FARGO BANK,
RENAISSANCE LEARNING, INC.                        NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By:    /s/ Mary Minch                             By:    /s/ Daniel Frazier
       --------------                                    ------------------
Title: Vice President of Finance/CFO/Secretary    Title: Vice President

                                       2
Exhibit 10.7


 


THIRD EXTENSION OF AMENDED STUDIO LEASE AGREEMENT


 


THIS THIRD EXTENSION OF THE AMENDED STUDIO LEASE AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made as of January 1, 2006
by and between THE HEARST CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (“Hearst”), and
HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).


 


W I  T  N  E  S  S  E  T  H


 


WHEREAS, Hearst and the
Company entered into a Studio Lease Agreement dated as of August 29, 1997 (the
“Studio Lease Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company leased to Hearst the
Leased Premises (as defined in the Studio Lease Agreement);


 


WHEREAS,
Hearst and the Company entered into an Amendment to Studio Lease Agreement
dated as of August 29, 2000 (the “Amended Studio Lease Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS,
Hearst and the Company extended the term of the Amended Studio Lease Agreement
pursuant to an initial Extension and a subsequent Second Extension of the
Amended Studio Lease Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS,
Hearst and the Company mutually desire to further extend the term of the
Amended Studio Lease Agreement, as set forth hereinafter;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained
herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, the Amended Studio Lease Agreement as so
amended is hereby extended by substituting the date of December 31, 2006 for
the date of August 31, 2004 in paragraph 2 (Term of Lease) in the Studio Lease
Agreement as so amended.


 


Except
as expressly set forth herein, all terms and conditions of the Studio Lease
Agreement as so amended shall continue in full force and effect.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this extension of the Studio Lease
Agreement as so amended as of the date first above written.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this extension of the Studio Lease
Agreement as so amended as of the date first above written.


 


	
  THE HEARST CORPORATION

  	
  HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Ronald Doerfler

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Jonathan C. Mintzer

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Dated: February 24, 2006

  	
  Dated: February 24, 2006
**EXHIBIT 21.1****SUBSIDIARIES**Belk-Simpson Company, Greenville, South Carolina (incorporatedin South Carolina)United Electronic Services, Inc. (incorporated in Virginia)The Belk Center, Inc. (incorporated in North Carolina)Belk International, Inc. (incorporated in North Carolina)Belk National Bank (incorporated in Georgia)Belk Stores Services, Inc. (incorporated in North Carolina)Belk Administration Company (incorporated in North Carolina)(Subsidiary of Belk Stores Services, Inc.)Belk Stores of Virginia LLC (incorporated in North Carolina)(Subsidiary of Belk Stores Services, Inc.)Belk Accounts Receivable LLC (incorporated in North Carolina)(Subsidiary of Belk Stores Services, Inc.)Belk Gift Card Company LLC (incorporated in North Carolina)Belk Merchandising LLC (incorporated in North Carolina)(Subsidiary of Belk International, Inc.)Belk Texas LP (incorporated in North Carolina)Belk Texas Holdings LLC (incorporated in North Carolina)