alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 24

                           POWER OF ATTORNEY
                           -----------------

Each of the following  directors and officers of Merrill Lynch & Co.,  Inc., the
general  partner of Merrill  Lynch  Preferred  Funding  I, L.P.,  Merrill  Lynch
Preferred Funding II, L.P.,  Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.,  Merrill
Lynch Preferred  Funding IV, L.P.,  Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P., and
Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding VI, L.P. (the  "Partnerships"),  appoints Thomas
H.   Patrick,   John  C.   Stomber   and  Mark  B.   Goldfus   individually   as
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution,  to sign and file
Annual  Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended  December 29,  2000,  and
amendments to the forms, on behalf of each of the Partnerships,  with full power
and authority to perform any appropriate or necessary act in connection with the
filing of the forms.

This  Power  of  Attorney  has  been  signed  by the  following  persons  in the
capacities indicated on the 28th day of March, 2001.




         SIGNATURE                                  TITLE
         ---------                                  -----



    /s/ DAVID H. KOMANSKY                   Chairman of the Board and Chief
-----------------------------------------   Executive Officer
       (David H. Komansky)




    /s/ THOMAS H. PATRICK                   Executive Vice President and Chief
-----------------------------------------   Financial Officer (Principal
       (Thomas H. Patrick)                  Financial Officer)



    /s/ AHMASS L. FAKAHANY                  Senior Vice President and Controller
-----------------------------------------   (Principal Accounting Officer)
       (Ahmass L. Fakahany)


    /s/ W.H. CLARK                          Director
-----------------------------------------
       (W.H. Clark)


    /s/ JILL K. CONWAY                      Director
-----------------------------------------
       (Jill K. Conway)


    /s/ STEPHEN L. HAMMERMAN                Director
-----------------------------------------
       (Stephen L. Hammerman)


    /s/ GEORGE B. HARVEY                    Director
-----------------------------------------
       (George B. Harvey)


    /s/ WILLIAM R. HOOVER                   Director
-----------------------------------------
       (William R. Hoover)


    /s/ ROBERT P. LUCIANO                   Director
-----------------------------------------
       (Robert P. Luciano)


    /s/ DAVID K. NEWBIGGING                 Director
-----------------------------------------
       (David K. Newbigging)


    /s/ AULANA L. PETERS                    Director
-----------------------------------------
       (Aulana L. Peters)


    /s/ JOHN J. PHELAN, JR.                 Director
-----------------------------------------
       (John J. Phelan, Jr.)


    /s/ JOHN L. STEFFENS                    Director
-----------------------------------------
       (John L. Steffens)
* Honorable James B. Moran, Senior United States Distri ct Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. J.W. MOORE; James Moore, a.k.a. "Buster"; Francis Williams, Defendants-Appellants. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. Arlutha W. Smiley, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. Rosa Mae Smiley Williams, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-7047, 94-7051 and 94-7055. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 8, 1999. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama (No. CR-93-310-N); Ira DeMent, Judge. Before EDMONDSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, and MORAN * Senior District Judge. Prior Report: 168 F.3d 1234 PER CURIAM: The petition(s) for rehearing filed by appella nts FRANCIS WILLIAMS, ARLUTHA W. SMILEY, and ROSA MAE WILLIAMS are DENIED. Footnote 2 in the original opinion, however, is strick en altogether and this language is put in its place as the new footnote 2: The evidence is detailed in Section III, addressing a ppellants' claims about multiple conspiracies, and in Section VI, where appellants' sentencing claims are addressed.
(LOGO)
10 South Broadway                   Telephone 314 444 1400    Fax 314 444 1470
Suite 900
St. Louis, MO 63102-1761





                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

The Board of Directors
Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.:

We have  examined  management's  assertion  about  Citicorp  Mortgage,  Inc. (an
indirect wholly owned  subsidiary of Citicorp) and  subsidiaries'  (the Company)
compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the  Mortgage
Bankers   Association  of    America's  UNIFORM  SINGLE ATTESTATION  PROGRAM FOR
MORTGAGE  BANKERS as of and  for   the  year ended December 31, 1997 included in
the  accompanying  management  assertion.  Management  is  responsible  for  the
Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards.  Our responsibility
is  to  express  an  opinion  on  management's  assertion  about  the  Company's
compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe our examination provides a
reasonable  basis for our  opinion.  Our  examination  does not  provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In  our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that  Citicorp  Mortgage,  Inc.  and
subsidiaries complied with the aforementioned  minimum servicing standards as of
and for the year ended  December  31,  1997 is fairly  stated,  in all  material
respects.

                                                  /s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

February 20, 1998
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Report of Strateco Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10K-SB/A for the period ending December 31, 2004, which contains the Companys financial statements audited for the year ended December 31, 2004 and for the year ended 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Guy Hébert, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;



and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Guy Hébert

__________________

Guy Hébert

President and Chief Executive Officer



June 6, 2005





---
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 22

- 10228 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Michael Deshaun Trevino,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:21

- CR

- 110

- 1

Before **Wiener, Elrod,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges. **Per Curiam :**  *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael Deshaun Trevino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Trevino has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the r elevant portions of the record

* This opinion is not d esignated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 7, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-10228 Document: 00516570141 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/07/2022No. 22

- 10228

2 reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further res ponsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 22-10228 Document: 00516570141 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/07/2022
#### MORRISON et al. v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS (Board of Claims).

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 31, 1952.

Crawford, Jull & Gentry, Louisville, for appellant.

J.D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Armand R. Angelucci, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

WADDILL, Commissioner.

This appeal is from a judgment of the Franklin Circuit Court affirming an order of the Board of Claims which dismissed appellants’ petition for damages.

The action was brought under the provisions of KRS 44.070 and stems from a collision involving the automobile driven by appellant, Keith Morrison, and a truck operated by an employee of the Department of Highways within the scope of his employment. The accident occurred on the afternoon of August 31, 1949, on Highway 62 in Oldham County, Kentucky. The amount of damages asserted by appellants is $718.05 and is not in issue. There is no claim for personal injury.

The right to maintain an action of this character against an agency of this Commonwealth is purely statutory. KRS 44.150 provides, that an appeal may be taken to this Court, but it limits the review in this Court to:

> “* * * matters subject to review by the circuit court and also errors of law arising in the circuit court * *

Appellants concede that the sole question the circuit court had before it on appeal was whether or not the findings of fact support the judgment.

In Shrader v. Commonwealth, and in Leet v. Commonwealth, (consolidated cases) reported in 309 Ky. 553, 218 S.W.2d 406, this Court held that the findings of fact by the Board of Claims are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence.

The record discloses that appellant, Keith Morrison, was the only witness who testi*427fied before the Board to sustain his theory of the case. On the other hand, appellee introduced several witnesses whose testimony amply supports the findings of the Board. Appellee’s witnesses testified that immediately prior to the accident appellant’s automobile was being driven at an excessive rate of speed and that although the driver of appellee’s truck gaVe proper signals of his intention to make a left turn, appellant’s car was driven into the rear of the highway truck.

The evidence presents a sharp conflict as to whose negligence caused the accident, and therefore, it was a matter that was within the province of the Board to decide.

Judgment affirmed.'

MOREMEN, J., not sitting.
<PAGE>

PRECEPT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
EXHIBIT 21 TO FORM 10-K
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999

              Precept Business Products, Inc.
              Precept Holdings, Inc.
              Precept Transportation Services, LLC
              Wingtip Couriers, Inc.
              Precept Transportation Services of Texas, Inc.
              Transportation Systems Corporation
              Shortway River Rouge, Inc.
              Jetport, Inc.
              Infographix, Inc.
              Creative Acquisition Corporation
              Precept Acquisition Corporation
              Garden State Acquisition Corporation
              Precept Transportation of New England, Inc.
              Computer Forms & Products, Inc.
OAKWOOD ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
ANNUAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

OAKWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC.
SENIOR/SUBORDINATED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
SERIES 1997-d

Pursuant to Section 3.13(a) of the Standard Terms to Pooling and Servicing
Agreement (November 1995 Edition) which is incorporated in the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated November 1, 1997 among Oakwood Mortgage Investors,
Inc., Oakwood Acceptance Corporation (the "Servicer") and PNC Bank, N.A., the
undersigned officer of the Servicer hereby certifies that a review of the
activities of the Servicer during the period October 1, 1997 through September
30, 1998 and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has
been made under his supervision and to the best of his knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement through such period.

By: /s/ Douglas R. Muir
--------------------------
Name: Douglas R. Muir
--------------------------
Title: Vice President
--------------------------
Date: September 30, 1998
--------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Pathmark
Stores, Inc. Consolidated Statement of Operations for the 39 weeks ended
November 2, 1996 and Consolidated Balance Sheet as of November 2, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1996
<CASH>                                          11,122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,468
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,128)
<INVENTORY>                                    230,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               304,743
<PP&E>                                         993,147
<DEPRECIATION>                               (395,685)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 991,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          475,383
<BONDS>                                      1,195,986
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,034,963)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   991,151
<SALES>                                      2,929,470
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,929,470
<CGS>                                        2,057,398
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,057,398
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (271)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (120,663)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,189)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,334
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,855)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (877)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,732)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

                  Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of C2, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

____________________________
William T. Donovan
March 20, 2003

                                       48
FAA-2011-0908
#### James JESSIE, Jr., Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 19, 1951.

Ora F. Duval, Olive Hill, for movant.

A. E. Funk, Atty. Gen., John B. Browning, Asst.. Atty. Gen., for the Commonwealth.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied.

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the Annual Report of Extendicare Health Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, Mel Rhinelander, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify solely for purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. sec.
1350 that based on my knowledge:

          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                          /s/ MEL RHINELANDER
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Mel Rhinelander
                                          Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                          Executive Officer
                                          March 23, 2004

     In connection with the Annual Report of Extendicare Health Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, Mark W. Durishan, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Company, certify solely for purposes of complying with 18
U.S.C. sec. 1350 that based on my knowledge:

          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                          /s/ MARK DURISHAN
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Mark Durishan
                                          Vice President, Chief Financial
                                          Officer and Treasurer
                                          March 23, 2004
r



### OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTINHonorableGeorge FL Sheppard,Page 2

thatwhen oil la found uponwhich the tax thereinprovided for has not beeh paid, any sheriffor other peace officer is authorized to levy on said 011 by notice to the owner or other persons in charge that said oil is levied on for taxes due on it, and after ten day8 notice posted at the sltoof the 013 saidoffloera shall proceed to sell said oil to the highest bidder for cash to effect a colleotlonof said taxes.

Subaeotion % of Section 1 of said article defines a first purchaser as any person purchasingorude oil from the producer. %e understand **from** your letter that the Cordoia Gathering System is In the busirlese of gatheringand **purchasing** crude oil fW the **produamr.** ft is thererare the opinion of this Departaent, that u 8u6h purohaaer it 5.8liable to pay the goat 

### prodPotIon tu on the oil **rhloh** It purebaae8, 

### butia ontitledto **deduat** 

### au& tuo8 _ironr

the pa-r& to tbo 

### pmduou. It 18 the respolufbillty of the **Cordova** 

### Gat!avrlng Sy8tu to datermina who the produoar of thin **overqp oil**  **ie,** a8 **the** State **is entitled**  **to ita**  tam8 on all oil **produmb** and the first **pmrahusnr** baa tbs napoa8ibllity **or** 

### ~~~~aoth" 06q+@.lerand mst leek to tbs 

### .prodmor Theract**that** 

### '&hopumbaur inoorrutl~ **muga** 

### tin oil ulimn it 

### f&us **it** 

### iato **it8** 

### plpa lines will 

## notd&oat 

## the **8tak'S** 

### tam*.

**ft uus**  

### thatthe **Cordova**

it&or, own 8ooh oil it ia br roamaS b6ilw tha purohirr tbm0r 0-n tw tha 

### 8eller 18 asknoon ana srrn tbowh 

### the wllar ha8 never been.pald ror It, **and as**  **auoh prvehrur**  it **lm liable**  **to** the **Stat*** **iOr** the **&roaa production**  **tUw8 tbXW3b** 

Eoping that this -18 

### ptw queatioa,we **are** Very tralyyaurn ATTORRfPPGRRERALOP‘Pl!XAS

D. D. Mahon ASSISTANT 

### APPROVED

OPlNlON 

# 0

**COMMI ’** **I-EE** 

### svWtr 6 ” A\l”nA ”
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Report of Strateco Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10K-SB for the period ending December 31, 2005, which contains the Companys financial statements audited for the year ended December 31, 2005 and audited for the year ended 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Guy Hébert, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;



and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Guy Hébert

__________________

Guy Hébert

President and Chief Executive Officer



February 22, 2006
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00733-CV

City of Austin, Appellant

v.

Garry Parker, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-06-000037, HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss, explaining that the parties have executed a

settlement agreement and intend to file a motion for non-suit in the trial court. We grant the motion

and dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2). Costs will be paid by the party incurring them.

___________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: January 27, 2009