alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from The
Bombay Company, Inc. quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the nine months
ended November 1, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000096287
<NAME> THE BOMBAY COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                           27618
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      94962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                141871
<PP&E>                                           89318
<DEPRECIATION>                                   51552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  188298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            35055
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         38104
<OTHER-SE>                                      108487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    188298
<SALES>                                         207303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                207303
<CGS>                                           151857
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   221574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1833)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12438)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (4917)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7521)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7521)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3241 

To amend the Pay Our Military Act to provide for continuing appropriations 

for defense civilian personnel (including military technicians (dual status)) and members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces 

performing inactive-duty training. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 3, 2013 

Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia (for himself, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. BROUN

of Georgia, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. WOODALL, Mr. COLLINS of 

Georgia, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mrs. ELLMERS, Mrs. ROBY, Mr. 

DENHAM, Mr. GRAVES of Georgia, Mr. TURNER, and Mrs. HARTZLER) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To amend the Pay Our Military Act to provide for continuing 

appropriations for defense civilian personnel (including 

military technicians (dual status)) and members of the 

reserve components of the Armed Forces performing inactive-duty training. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pay our Guardsmen 

5 and Civilian Defense Personnel Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3241 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR EMPLOYEES 

2 OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND RESERVE 

3 COMPONENT PERSONNEL. 

4 Section 2(a) of the Pay Our Military Act (H.R. 3210 

5 of the 113th Congress) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘or inactive7 duty training (as those terms are defined in section 

8 101(d) of such title)’’ after ‘‘active service’’; and 

9 (2) in paragraph, (2) by striking ‘‘whom the 

10 Secretary concerned determines are providing sup11 port to members of the Armed Forces described in 

12 paragraph (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘, including all mili13 tary technicians (dual status)’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### PARRISH v. STATE.

No. 24573.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 23, 1949.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Upon his plea of guilty, appellant was convicted of the offense of driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated and his punishment assessed at a fine of $50.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for the consideration of this court.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court
exv10w20



 






Exhibit 10.20




ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT

AND NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENT




     This Addendum to the Employment and Noncompetition Agreement (“Addendum”) between SCI
Executive Services, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the “Company”) and the undersigned executive of
the Company (the “Employee”), is executed as of December 1, 2005.



     The Company and the Employee have previously entered into an Employment and Noncompetition
Agreement (“Agreement”).



     This Addendum is intended to (i) supplement and modify such Agreement in order to comply with
applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, and (ii) extend the term of the
Agreement.



     This Agreement is modified effective as of December 31, 2005 as follows:




	 	1.	 	Notwithstanding the applicable provisions of this Agreement regarding timing of
distribution of payments, the following special rules shall apply in order for this
Agreement to comply with IRC §409A: (i) to the extent any distribution is to a
“specified employee” (as defined under IRC §409A) and to the extent such applicable
provisions of IRC §409A require a delay of such distributions by a six month period
after the date of such Employee’s separation of service with the Company, the
provisions of this Agreement shall be construed and interpreted as requiring a six
month delay in the commencement of such distributions thereunder, and (ii) in the event
there are any installment payments under this Agreement that are required to be delayed
by a six month period in order to comply with IRC §409A, the monthly installments that
would have been paid during such six month delay shall be accumulated and paid to the
Employee in a single lump sum within five business days after the end of such six month
delay, and (iii) the Company shall not have the discretion to prepay any installment
payments otherwise provided under this Agreement.
	 
	 	2.	 	To the extent of any compliance issues under Internal Revenue Code Section
409A, the Agreement shall be construed in such a manner so as to comply with the
requirements of such provision so as to avoid any adverse tax consequences to the
Employee.
	 
	 	3.	 	The term of the Agreement is hereby extended to December 31, 2006.





     EXECUTED as of the date first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	SCI Executive Services, Inc.	 	 	 	Employee	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Curtis G. Briggs
	 	 	 	Name:	 	 
	Title:

	 	Vice President
The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chi ef Judge, United States District Court for 1 the Southern District of Iowa. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-4232

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Frank Baumgardner, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 21, 1997 Filed: December 5, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. After a jury found Fra

nk Baumgardner guilty of making a false statement to the Social Security Administration (SSA), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (1994), and of co mmittingSocial Security fraud, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(4) (1994), th e District Court sentenced him to twenty-three months of imprisonment and three years

1 of supervised release. On appeal, this Court vacated Baumgardner & s false-statement-2-

convictio n

and remanded for a new trial, but affirmed his Social Security frau d con victionand remanded for resentencing on that count. See United States v
. Baumgardner , 85 F.3d 1305, 1308-10, 13 10-11 (8th Cir. 1996). On remand, the court granted the government & s motion to dismiss the false-statement count; the partie s stipulated that Baumgardner shou ld be resentenced based solely on the amount of loss at tributable to his Social Security fraud conviction, which resulted in a Guideline s imprisonm ent

range of twelve to eighteen months; and the court sentence d Baum gardner

to fourteen months of imprisonment and three years of supervise d relea se. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 73 8 (1967), arguing that the court should have sentenced Baumgardner to twelve months of imprisonment. We affirm. Because Baumgardner does n ot challenge the legal basis for his sentence or the applicable Guidelines range of twelve to eighteen months, and the sentence the court imposed is within that range, we conclude that the issue counse l raises is unreviewable. See 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) (1994); United States v. Woodrum , 959 F.2d 100, 101 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam). In accordance with P enson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we have reviewed the record and find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 31.2
Section 302 Certification
I, David W. Sharp, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 of HorizonOffshore, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 31, 2005
/s/ David W. Sharp
David W. Sharp
[No. 35346.

Department Two.

September 1, 1960.]

#### Miriam Juntunen, Respondent, v. Aarne Juntunen, *Appellant.**1*

*Merges & Brain (Edwards E. Merges,*of counsel), for appellant.

*Campbell & Gober,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 354 P. (2d) 916.

Per Curiam.

— The respondent brought this divorce action, under RCW 26.08.020(5), alleging cruel treatment and personal indignities rendering life burdensome. The trial court found:

> “That the defendant has been guilty of cruel treatment toward the plaintiff; that he has struck the plaintiff, has called her a prostitute, has belittled her before the help employed in the nursing home in that he has called her a ‘self-styled queen’; that he has written a disparaging letter about her to their daughter Ardell, has made false insinuations as to her mental condition, to plaintiff and daughter Marilyn, all of which has caused her to suffer mental *687pain and anguish and has caused her to become extremely nervous and upset, and as a result thereof it is impossible for the parties to live together as husband and wife.”

Appealing from the decree in favor of the respondent, the appellant challenges these findings. Our review of the record, however, discloses substantial evidence to sustain them.

Furthermore, the appellant did not deny that he had used physical violence against the respondent; these acts in themselves brought him within the purview of our divorce statute. *Schmidt v. Schmidt,*51 Wn. (2d) 753, 321 P. (2d) 895.

The appellant urges that the respondent was precluded from obtaining a decree of divorce under the doctrine of recrimination. That doctrine is that a person seeking a divorce must be innocent of any substantial wrongdoing to the other party of the same nature as that of which complaint is made. *Schmidt v. Schmidt, supra; Hokamp v. Hokamp,*32 Wn. (2d) 593, 203 P. (2d) 357.

There was evidence from which the court could well have determined that the actions of the respondent to which the appellant refers in support of his claim of recrimination, were provoked or justified — a determination which it apparently made in view of the finding that the respondent had not been guilty of cruel treatment of the appellant. In any event, the acts were not of the same nature as those of the appellant, which they must be if the doctrine of recrimination is to be applied.

The judgment is affirmed.
exv10w4



 






Exhibit 10.4




[TJX Letterhead]




Mr. Donald G. Campbell

The TJX Companies, Inc.

770 Cochituate Road

Framingham, MA 01701




     Re: Modification of Employment Agreement


Dear Mr. Campbell:




     Reference
is made to the Employment Agreement dated as of April 5, 2005 (as subsequently
amended and in effect, the “Agreement”) between you and The TJX Companies, Inc. (the “Company”).
The Company proposes to amend Section 3(a) of the Agreement (“Base Salary”) by adding at the end
thereof the following text: “Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, however,
effective for periods commencing on or after March 13, 2006 the preceding provisions of this
Section 3(a) shall be applied by substituting $720,000.00 for $775,000.00.”



     If you agree with the foregoing proposed amendment to the Agreement, please so indicate by
signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to Mr. Paul Kangas, whereupon the
Agreement will be deemed amended, effective immediately, to incorporate the change set forth above,
and, except as to amended, the Agreement will continue in effect in accordance with its terms.
This letter agreement shall constitute an agreement under seal.





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Paul Kangas
 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 



I agree to the amendment described above

to the Employment Agreement dated as of

April 5, 2005 between me and The TJX

Companies, Inc., as previously modified,

effective as of the date set forth below:




/s/ Donald G. Campbell

Donald G. Campbell




Date: March 7, 2006
JOSE DEMETRIO PINEDA

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 21

- 0014 3

- CR

Appeal from the

109 th District Court

O f Winkler , Texas

( TC# DC16

- 5584 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, J J.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3231 

Making automatic continuing appropriations for law enforcement, crime prevention, and victim services programs of the Department of Justice 

in the event of a Government shutdown. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 2, 2013 

Mr. POE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

Making automatic continuing appropriations for law enforcement, crime prevention, and victim services programs 

of the Department of Justice in the event of a Government shutdown. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Continuing Protection 

5 for Victims and Law Enforcement Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3231 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTOMATIC CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR 

2 LAW ENFORCEMENT, CRIME PREVENTION, 

3 AND VICTIM SERVICES PROGRAMS. 

4 There are hereby appropriated for fiscal year 2014, 

5 for any period during which a joint resolution or other 

6 Act making appropriations for commerce, justice, science, 

7 and related agencies is not in effect, such sums as may 

8 be necessary for continuing law enforcement, crime pre9 vention, and victim services programs for which funds 

10 were made available in title II of the Commerce, Justice, 

11 Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2013 

12 (division B of Public Law 113–6), at a rate for operations 

13 as provided for such purposes by such Act (as reduced 

14 by the Presidential sequestration order dated March 1, 

15 2013). 

16 SEC. 3. TREATMENT OF EXPENDITURES AT END OF AUTO17 MATIC CR PERIOD. 

18 Expenditures made available pursuant to this Act 

19 shall be charged to the applicable appropriation whenever 

20 a regular or continuing appropriations Act described in 

21 section 2 is enacted into law. 

22 SEC. 4. AVAILABILITY OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

23 Unless otherwise provided for in this Act or in the 

24 applicable appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014, appro25 priations and funds made available and authority granted 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3231 IH

1 pursuant to this Act shall be available until whichever of 

2 the following first occurs: 

3 (1) The enactment into law of an appropriation 

4 for any project or activity provided for in this Act. 

5 (2) The enactment into law of the applicable 

6 appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014 without any 

7 provision for such project or activity. 

8 (3) December 15, 2013. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the amended Annual Report of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I,
Steven  J. Cohen, President of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)           The
Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Z Trim Holdings,
Inc.




August
      19, 2008
              By:
              /s/
      Steven J. CohenSteven
      J. CohenPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)
Appendix C: Stationa ry Sources

Report on A ssessment of NOx/PM Strategies

Assessm ent of need for NO X and PM m ilestones. Pursuant to 40 CFR 51.309(d)(4)(v), the State of Ne w Me xico has evaluated the need for NO X and PM e m ission control strategies, the degree of visibility im prove m e nt expected, and whethe r such m iles t ones are n e eded to avo i d any n e t increase in these pollutants. This ev aluation was m a de by the WRAP M a rket Trading Forum for all W R AP state s , inc l ud ing the transport region states. Several conclusions were reached based on current analyses. These include:

• That for the vast m a jority of Class I areas throughout the WRAP region stationary source NO X and PM em i ssions are not a m a jor cont ribu tor to visibility im pairm e nt;

• That RAVI rem e dies are availab l e in cas es where particular station a ry sou r ces m a y im pact particular Class I areas ;

• That the need for stationary source NO X and PM m ilestones is not supported at this tim e with current state of analyses , but the need for m ilestones s hould be reassessed based on m o re

com p lete and accurate analyses p r io r to subm ittal of the 2007 /2008 SIP revisions ; and,

• That the absolute need for m ilestones to support potential m a rket-b ased program s is not yet es tablish e d.

This report is provided in Appendix C-2 of this implem entation plan. The State of New Mexico has determ ined that NO X and PM strategies are not needed based on current inform ation. The State of New Mexico will review th e need for long-term strategies for s t ationary so urces of PM and NO X during the SIP revision updat es due in 2008, 2013, and 2018.

NM Regi onal Haze SIP Page C

- 1 12/ 31/ 03