alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3240 

To instruct the Comptroller General of the United States to study the impact 

of Regulation D, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 3, 2013 

Mr. PITTENGER (for himself and Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To instruct the Comptroller General of the United States 

to study the impact of Regulation D, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Regulation D Study 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE STUDY. 

7 (a) STUDY.—The Comptroller General of the United 

8 States shall conduct a comprehensive study on the impact 

9 on depository institutions, consumers, and monetary policy 

10 of the requirement that depository institutions maintain 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3240 IH

1 reserves in accordance with subsections (b) and (c) of sec2 tion 19 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 461) and 

3 Regulation D (12 C.F.R. 204). 

4 (b) MATTERS TO BE STUDIED.—In conducting the 

5 study under this section, the Comptroller General shall in6 clude the following: 

7 (1) An historic review of how the Board of Gov8 ernors of the Federal Reserve System has used re9 serve requirements to conduct United States mone10 tary policy, including information on how and when 

11 the Board of Governors has changed the required re12 serve ratio. 

13 (2) The impact of the maintenance of reserves 

14 on depository institutions, including the operational 

15 requirements and associated costs. 

16 (3) The impact on consumers in managing their 

17 accounts, including the costs and benefits of the re18 serving system. 

19 (4) Alternatives the Board of Governors may 

20 have to the maintenance of reserves to effect mone21 tary policy. 

22 (c) CONSULTATION.—In conducting the study under 

23 this section, the Comptroller General shall consult with 

24 credit unions and community banks. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3240 IH

1 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date 

2 of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall 

3 submit to Congress a report containing— 

4 (1) the results of the study conducted pursuant 

5 to this section; and 

6 (2) any recommendations based on such study. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION, LIMITED, Petitioner, v. Alton C. YOUNG, Respondent.

No. A-1384.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Oct. 15, 1947.

For former opinion, see 203 S.W.2d 822.

Simpson, Clayton & Fullingim and E. A. Simpson, all of Amarillo, for petitioner Corporation.

W. F. Nix, of Amarillo, for respondent Young.

PER CURIAM.

There are two applications in this case for the writ of error — one by the Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation and one by Alton C. Young. We find no reversible error in either application and both are refused, no reversible error.

However, we do not approve that part of the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals which criticises the manner of submission of the special issues by the trial court. They were framed in accordance with our holding in Traders & General Insurance Co. v. Jenkins, 135 Tex. 232, 141 S.W.2d 312, and were correct.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1 D 2 0 2 3

- 2923

_____________________________
M ICHAEL J AMES S PILLMAN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. James M. Colaw
, Judge

.

January 19, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
R OBERTS , K ELSEY , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Michael James Spillman
, pro se, Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
**Exhibit 13.2**

** **

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

** **

In connection with theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Tricom, S.A. (the “Company”) for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Erwin Mendez,Vice President, Finance & Administration of the Company, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the PeriodicReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|                    | /s/ ERWIN MENDEZ                              |   |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated: October 29, 2007 | Erwin Mendez                                  |   |
|                    | Vice President, Finance  & Administration |

 

----
#### Ritter et al., Appellants, *v.*Milk & Ice Cream Drivers *&*Dairy Employees Union et al., Appellees.

(No. 28040

Decided May 1, 1940.)

*Mr. Charles Auerbach*and *Mr. Ray T. Miller,*for appellants.

*Messrs. Payer, Corrigan & Bleiweiss,*for appellee, Milk *&*Ice Cream Drivers & Dairy Employees ’ Union.

*Messrs. Baker, Hostetler & Patterson*and *Mr. Clayton A. Quintrell,*for appellee, The Telling Belle-Vernon Company.

*Messrs. Thompson, Hme é Flory,*for appellee, Dairymen’s Milk Company.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said 'cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.3


 


Fargo
Electronics, Inc.

2006 Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary


 


The Board of Directors of Fargo Electronics, Inc.
approved the following fee schedule to be effective January 1, 2006
for non-employee directors:


 


	
  Annual Retainer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  20,000

  	
   

  
	
  Lead Director

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  8,000

  	
   

  
	
  Audit Committee chair

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  7,000

  	
   

  
	
  Audit Committee members

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  3,000

  	
   

  
	
  Other Committee chairs

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  3,000

  	
   

  
	
  Other Committee members

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  2,000

  	
   

  



 


The Board also approved a grant of 2,100
shares of restricted stock to each non-employee director on the date of Fargo’s
2006 annual meeting.  These shares will
vest ratably on a cumulative basis on the first three anniversaries of the
grant date.


 


All cash compensation will
be paid quarterly.


 


1
w.

jFourtI) Court of Appeals

g>an Antonio, ticxas

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

NO.04-15-00008-CV

Bakke Development Corp.,

Appellant

V.

Eddie L. Albin and Kim A. Albin,

Appellee

Trial Court Case No. 13-192

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral

argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the

cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on Tuesday, September 8, 2015, to the following

panel: Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, and Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa.

All parties will be notified ofthe Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with Tex. R. App.

P. 48.

Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that

oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues

presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10)

days from the date ofthis order.

It is so ORDERED on Wednesday, July 29, 2015.

,Rebe^^^7Martinez, ^istice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and ^fixed the

court on this Wednesday, July 29, 2015.

e, Cler
REPORT AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 

Study Title 

SCREENING FOR THE EYE IRRITANCY POTENTIAL OF 

EXP1313100 USING THE BOVINE CORNEAL OPACITY AND 

PERMEABILITY TEST (BCOP TEST) 

Sponsor 

Test Facility 

WIL Research Europe B.V. 

Hambakenwetering 7 

5231 DD 's-Hertogenbosch 

The Netherlands 

Laboratory Project Identification 

Project 505701 

Substance 205622/A 

- Page 1 of 3 -
EXP1313100 Project 505701 

AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION 

CONCERNING 

Page 17, Appendix 4. Paragraph title: Certificate of analysis. 

REASON FOR AMENDMENT 

A new certificate of analysis was provided by the sponsor. 

APPROVAL 

This report amendment has been audited by the Quality Assurance Unit. 

Project 505701 

Type of Start End 

Phase/Process Inspection Inspection inspections date date 

Study Report Amendment 01 21-0ct-2014 21-0ct-2014 

The review of the final report amendment was completed on the date of signing this QA 

statement. 

Quality Assurance 

- Page 2 of 3 -

Reporting 

date 

21-0ct-2014 
EXP1313100 Project 505701 

APPENDIX 4 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 

Final Report - Page 17 -
#### FLATT v. STATE.

No. 22436.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 10, 1943.

Wm. Yelderman, of Austin, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for felony theft, punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The indictment is in proper form. No statement of facts or bills of exception are found in the record. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### ANTOINE v. STATE.

No. 25248.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 21, 1951.

No Attorney on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

•Negligent homicide is the offense; the punishment, one year in jail.

Accompanying the record is an affidavit in proper form executed by appellant requesting the dismissal of the appeal. The request is granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.
exv10w5



 






Exhibit 10.5




BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.

DIRECTOR CASH COMPENSATION PLAN

(Amended and Restated on February 2, 2006*)




Annual retainer fees — $25,000 per year, plus





	–	 	Independent Chairman of the Board — $30,000
	 
	–	 	Audit Committee Chair — $5,000
	 
	–	 	Audit Committee member — $10,000
	 
	–	 	Compensation Committee Chair — $5,000
	 
	–	 	Compensation Committee member — $5,000
	 
	–	 	Nominating/Governance Committee chair — $5,000
	 
	–	 	Nominating/Governance Committee member — $5,000





Additional fees per committee meeting:





In person — $1,500

By telephone — $1,000




	*	 	The Amendment on February 2, 2006 set the annual cash compensation for the “Independent
Chairman of the Board” at $30,000.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


    CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         I, David W. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer of Horizon Offshore, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the period covered by such Report.


                                                   /s/ DAVID W. SHARP
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   David W. Sharp
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64259-64260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27567]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-04020]


Thomson Consumer Electronic, Incorporated, A.T.O. Division, 
Dunmore, PA; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application 
for Reconsideration

    By letter of October 6, 2000, the company requested administrative 
reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative 
Determination Regarding Eligibility to

[[Page 64260]]

Apply for NAFTA-Transitional Adjustment Assistance applicable to 
workers of the subject firm. The denial notice was signed on August 15, 
2000, and published in the Federal Register on September 12, 2000 (65 
FR 55050).
    The petitioner presents evidence that the Department's survey of 
the company's customers was incomplete.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of 
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 17th day of October 2000.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-27567 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0064

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RONALD ALAN HUMMEL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 1, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 23 2020

11/23/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0064
Exhibit 13.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of TRICOM, S.A. (the "Company") for the annual period ended December 31,
2002 (the "Periodic Report"), I, Ramon Tarrago, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: April 29, 2004 |  | /s/RAMÓN TARRAGORamón Tarrago
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of International Division
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp
                                CFO Certification                   Exhibit 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Tel-Instrument  Electronics
Corp. (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Joseph P. Macaluso,  Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge and based on my review of the Report:

            3.    the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            4.    the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

                                           By: /s/ Joseph P. Macaluso
                                               -----------------------------
                                               /s/ Joseph P. Macaluso
                                               Principal Accounting Officer

                                                  December 22, 2003

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Tel-Instrument  Electronics  Corp  and will be  retained  by
Tel-Instrument  Electronics  Corp and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      -16-
WACO

WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC

CIVIL NO:

WA:20-CV-00473-ADA

ORDER SETTING MOTION HEARING HEARING BY ZOOM

12/21/2020 02:00 PM

vs.

12/14/2020

Alan D Albright

IT IS SO ORDERED this

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

§

§

§

§

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., DELL INC., §

EMC CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered case is set for

MOTION HEARING BY ZOOM on Monday, December 21, 2020 at 02:00 PM. The link

for the hearing will be sent by e-mail.

Case 6:20-cv-00473-ADA Document 60 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHAWALI KHAN, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 08-1101 (JDB) BARACK OBAMA, et al., Respondents.
ORDER Upon consideration of [247] Respondents' Unopposed Motion to Deem Protected Information Highlighted in the Accompanying Proposed Public Factual Return for ISN 899, and a review of that proposed public factual return, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondents' motion is GRANTED . The information identified by Respondents with green or gray highlighting in the version of the factual return submitted under seal to the Court is deemed protected, pursuant to paragraphs 10 and 34 of the Protective Order governing this proceeding. It is further ORDERED that Respondents file on the public record, through the Court's Electronic Case Filing system, a public version of the factual return from which the information that was highlighted in gray or green in the proposed public version submitted to the Court has been redacted. SO ORDERED
.

/s/ JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge Date: March 21, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                            5522
<SECURITIES>                                      2540
<RECEIVABLES>                                    28320
<ALLOWANCES>                                       695
<INVENTORY>                                      15563<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 53671
<PP&E>                                           55999
<DEPRECIATION>                                   34613
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   83820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            23956
<BONDS>                                          17297
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         40245
<OTHER-SE>                                         485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     83820
<SALES>                                          71825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 76276
<CGS>                                            42287
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    46315
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 26643
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    87
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2511
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1092
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1419
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1419
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
<FN>
<F1>Tag #14 Inventory detail at November 30,1995 was finished goods $9916;
work in process $649; raw materials $4998
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.9





LOAN AGREEMENT


(English Translation)





THIS LOAN AGREEMENT, is made this tenth day of January, 2009, by and among Harbin Tianmu Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., a Chinese corporation (hereinafter knows as “BORROWER”) and Mr. Mingli Yao (hereinafter knows as “LENDER”). BORROWER and LENDER shall collectively be known herein as “the Parties”. In determining the rights and duties of the Parties under this Loan Agreement, the entire document must be read as a whole.




In order to define the rights and obligations of the Borrowers and the Lender under relevant loan arrangements, the Parties hereby agree as follows:




Article 1 Amount and Interest Rate of Loan




1.1 Subject to the terms and conditions herein, the Lender agrees to provide the Borrowers with a loan with the principal of RMB 3,900,000.




1.2 The interest rate of the Loan hereunder is 7% per year.




Article 2 Use and Term of Loan




2.1
The term of the Loan hereunder shall be two(2) years, counted from the day when the Loan is provided and can be renewed every two years.




2.2
The loan should be used for the company and its future development.Board of directors must approve it in order to use the loan.




Article 3 Defaulting Liabilities




3.1 The Borrowers undertake to hold the Lender harmless and indemnify the Lender against any actions, charges, claims, costs, damages, demands, expenses, liabilities, losses and proceedings which the Lender may suffer or be subject to as a result of any default by the Borrowers of its obligations hereunder.




3.2 Notwithstanding any other provisions herein, the validity of this Article shall survive the suspension or termination of this Agreement.





This agreement is made out in three originals, one for each party and one for Harbin Tianmu Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. All of them have the same force and effect.










(Signature page)




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Loan Agreement to be executed as of the date and in the place first set forth above.




By:/s/ Mingli Yao




Name: Mingli Yao




Harbin Tianmu Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd




By:/s/ Mingli Yao




Name: Mingli Yao




Title: President