alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27415]



[[Page 63919]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Privacy Act of 1974, as Amended; System of Records

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of alterations to an existing Privacy Act system of 
records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Treasury Department, Internal Revenue Service, gives 
notice of proposed alterations to Treasury/IRS 00.333--Third Party 
Contact Records, which is subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 
552A, as amended.

EFFECTIVE DATE:  November 24, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Harry Manaka, National Director, 
Collection Field Operations, Room 7238, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20224. Telephone number (202) 622-5110.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  The Internal Revenue Service is removing 
``fact of reprisal determination records'' from the system of records 
Treasury/IRS 00.333--Third Party Contact Records. The reprisal 
determination records will be included in the ``Categories of records'' 
for the proposed new system of records entitled ``Third Party Contact 
Reprisal Records--Treasury/IRS 00.334.'' The change will allow the IRS 
to withhold the information that there was a reprisal determination 
because there is a proposed (k)(2) exemption for the Third Party 
Contact Reprisal Records. Withholding such information will protect the 
third party contact and others from situations where the taxpayer could 
initiate reprisal by guessing the identity of the third party contact 
or incorrectly identifying somebody the taxpayer believes was the third 
party contact. Also, under the heading ``Retrievability,'' we are 
clarifying that records may be retrieved by taxpayer name control.
    The system notice was last published in its entirety in the Federal 
Register, Vol. 64, page 32095, on June 15, 1999. The changes to the 
system of records are not within the purview of subsection (r) of the 
Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, which requires the submission of a new 
or altered system report. For the reasons set forth in this preamble, 
the IRS proposes to amend its system of records Treasury/IRS 00.333 as 
set forth below.

    Dated: August 29, 2000.
W. Earl Wright, Jr.,
Chief Management and Administrative Programs Officer.
Treasury/IRS 00.333

System Name:
     Third Party Contact Records--Treasury/IRS.
* * * * *

Categories of Records in the System:
    Description of Change: Delete ``fact of reprisal determination''.
* * * * *

Retrievability: * * *
    Description of Change: After ``By taxpayer identification number 
(social security number or employer identification number)'' insert the 
following: ``and taxpayer name control.''
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 00-27415 Filed 10-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-01-P
EX-10.24



 





EXHIBIT
10.24




2005 Incentive Targets and Transition Incentive Plan

Name




New Incentive Targets




Effective January 1, 2005, your incentive targets are as follows:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Ø

	 	Performance Incentive Plan:
	 	% of salary
	Ø

	 	Long-Term Incentive Plan:
	 	% of salary





Relative to 2004, this changes your pay mix as follows:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	2004 Target Comp	 	 	2005 Target Comp	 
	 
	Base Pay
	 	 	 	 	 	$	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	$	 	 
	Annual Incentive Target
	 	 	%	 	 	$	 	 	 	 	%	 	 	$	 	 
	Long-Term Incentive Target
	 	 	%	 	 	$	 	 	 	 	%	 	 	$	 	 
	 
	Total Compensation @ Target
	 	 	 	 	 	$	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	$	 	 
	 





Transition Incentive Plan




The Company recognizes that the change in pay mix for 2005 will reduce your short-term cash
opportunities. In consideration for this impact and in recognition of your critical role in
executing our business strategy, you have been approved to participate in a special Transition
Incentive Plan for 2005.





	Ø 	 	This Plan provides a one-time performance-based award in an amount equal to the
difference between your actual 2005 Performance Incentive Plan award (payable in 2006) and what
that award would have been had your annual incentive target not been reduced.
	 
	Ø 	 	Your Transition Incentive Plan award, if any, will be paid as follows:






	 	•	 	1/3 cash
	 
	 	•	 	2/3 RSUs






	Ø 	 	The number of RSUs awarded will be determined by dividing the dollar amount to be
paid in RSUs (two-thirds of the Transition Incentive award) by the closing price of PNX shares on
the first business day of 2006.
	 
	Ø 	 	Your RSUs will vest incrementally over the three year
period following the 2006 award date





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Example:

	 	 	 	 	 	Annual

Award
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	@ Target
	 	 	 	Transition Incentive Award

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	2004 Annual Target	 	 	%	 	 	 	$	 	 	 	 	Assuming Target Results

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	2005 Annual Target

	 	 	%	 	 	 	$	 	 	 	 	Cash Portion
	 	 	$  	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Transition Incentive Assuming 	$	 	 	 	 	RSU Portion	 	 	$  	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Target Results
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3086 

AN ACT 

To permanently extend the Internet Tax Freedom Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3086 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent Internet 

3 Tax Freedom Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PERMANENT MORATORIUM ON INTERNET ACCESS 

5 TAXES AND MULTIPLE AND DISCRIMINATORY 

6 TAXES ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1101(a) of the Internet 

8 Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by 

9 striking ‘‘ during the period beginning November 1, 2003, 

10 and ending November 1, 2014’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxes imposed after the date 

13 of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 15, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3086 

AN ACT 

To permanently extend the Internet Tax Freedom 

Act.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary of Defense.

# AGENCY:

Advisory Group on Electron Devices, Department of Defense

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Working Group B (Microelectronics) of the DoD Advisory Group on Electron (AGED) announces a change to a closed session meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held at 0900, Thursday, November 30, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held Palisades Institute for Research Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elise Rabin, AGED Secretariat, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 22202.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The mission of the Advisory Group is to provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, to the Director Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E), and through the DDR&E, to the Director Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and managing an effective research and development program in the field of electron devices.

The Working Group B meeting will be limited to review of research and development programs which the military proposes to initiate with industry, universities or in their laboratories. The microelectronics area includes such programs on semiconductor materials, integrated circuits, charge coupled devices and memories. The review will include classified program details throughout.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, (5 U.S.C. App. § 10(d)(1994)), it has been determined that this Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1)(1994), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the public.

Dated: October 17, 2000.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-27200  Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
JEFFERY SCOTT SEWARD, 

SR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5016

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 13, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

Jeffery Scott Seward, Sr., pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., WOLF and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3087 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3087

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the receipt of 
bonuses by Department of Veterans Affairs employees who violate Federal 
           civil laws or regulations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2013

Mr. Roe of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the receipt of 
bonuses by Department of Veterans Affairs employees who violate Federal 
           civil laws or regulations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Affairs Employee 
Accountability Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON BONUSES FOR DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              EMPLOYEES WHO VIOLATE FEDERAL CIVIL LAWS OR REGULATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 7 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 713. LIMITATION ON BONUSES.

    ``(a) In General.--(1) The Secretary shall ensure that no employee 
of the Department who, during any year, knowingly violates any law, 
regulation, or policy described in paragraph (2) receives a bonus for 
or during that year.
    ``(2) A law, regulation, or policy described in this paragraph is 
any of the following:
            ``(A) A Federal civil law or Federal regulation, including 
        such civil laws or regulations covered under the Federal 
        Acquisition Regulation and the Veterans Affairs Acquisition 
        Regulation.
            ``(B) An internal policy of the Department.
    ``(b) Certification.--The Secretary shall annually certify to 
Congress that each bonus awarded by the Secretary during the previous 
year was awarded in accordance with subsection (a)(1).
    ``(c) Bonus Defined.--For purposes of this section, the term 
`bonus' includes--
            ``(1) a retention incentive;
            ``(2) a retention incentive payment;
            ``(3) a retention incentive award; and
            ``(4) any other incentive requiring approval from the 
        Central Office Human Resource Service, the Chief Business 
        Office Workforce Management, or the Corporate Senior Executive 
        Management Office.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``713. Limitation on bonuses''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.01 

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

       In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Swank, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), the undersigned each hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         154,579
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,087,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                   237,627
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,508,158
<PP&E>                                      20,331,646
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,501,243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,782,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,765,138
<BONDS>                                     14,837,067
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           310
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,353,039)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,782,831
<SALES>                                     30,294,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,304,678
<CGS>                                       35,703,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,703,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,016,551
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (6,414,891)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,720
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,418,611)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.10)
        

</TABLE>
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp
                               CFO Certification                    Exhibit 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Tel-Instrument  Electronics
Corp.  (the  "Company"),  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending June 30, 2004,  as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Joseph P. Macaluso,  Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge and based on my review of the Report:

            3.    the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            4.    the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

                                                By: /s/ Joseph P. Macaluso
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    /s/ Joseph P. Macaluso
                                                    Principal Accounting Officer

                                                    August 13, 2004

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Tel-Instrument  Electronics  Corp  and will be  retained  by
Tel-Instrument  Electronics  Corp and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00438-CR

Sean Patrick Nelson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF LAMPASAS COUNTY

NO. 10039, THE HONORABLE JOHN GAUNTT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On August 17, 2020, Sean Patrick Nelson entered an open plea of “guilty” in the 

district court’s cause number 10039 to a count of bail jumping/failure to appear. See Tex. Penal 

Code § 38.10. The trial court accepted Nelson’s plea and found him guilty of the offense. After

reviewing a presentencing report and hearing evidence, the trial court sentenced Nelson to ten 

years’ imprisonment.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by 

a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the 

requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record 

demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see 
2

also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 81–82 (1988). Specifically, counsel analyzed nine possible

bases for appeal and found that each lacked merit.

Appellant’s counsel has certified to this Court that he sent copies of the motion 

and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro 

se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also 

Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. To date, appellant has not filed such a brief.

We have conducted an independent review of the record—including the record of 

the trial proceedings below and counsel’s brief—and have found no reversible error. See Anders, 

386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2005). We therefore agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably 

meritorious ground for review. We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw from the case and affirm 

the judgment of conviction.

__________________________________________

Edward Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justice Baker and Smith

Affirmed

Filed: June 30, 2021

Do Not Publish
#### WHITAKER v. STATE.

No. 25105.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 17, 1951.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

.George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of -Austin, for the State.

*653DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

The offense is the sale and delivery of whisky in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $300 and 60 days in jail.

No statement of facts accompanies the record, in the absence of which we are unable to appraise the bills of exception complaining of the argument of state’s counsel.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of MDSI Mobile Data Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Verne D. Pecho, the Vice President Finance & Administration and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act                   of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial                   condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Verne D. PechoVerne D. Pecho
Vice President Finance & Administration
and Chief Financial Officer

November 15, 2004
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  registration
statement of BCSB  Bankcorp,  Inc. on Form S-8 (File No.  333-53295 and File No.
333-85025)  of  our  report  dated  November  28,  2000  on  our  audits  of the
consolidated  financial  statements of BCSB  Bankcorp,  Inc. as of September 30,
2000 and 1999,  and for each of the two years in the period ended  September 30,
2000, which report has been  incorporated by reference in BCSB Bankcorp,  Inc.'s
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



/s/ Anderson Associates, LLP


Baltimore, Maryland
December 26, 2000
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of  Chapter 63 of Title 18 of The United States Code

I, J. Patrick Spainhour, the Chief Executive Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
(ii) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The
ServiceMaster Company.

/s/ J. PATRICK SPAINHOUR J. Patrick Spainhour
March 30, 2010


---



QuickLinks
#### MOCZYGEMBA v. STATE.

No. 24561.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 23, 1949.

No appearance for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*712KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is robbery by assault. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of two years.

The record in this case is before us without any bills of exceptions or a statement of facts. Consequently, there is nothing presented for'review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.