alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certify to the following with respect to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEl') public review process concerning the proposed revision to the Massachusetts Carbon Monoxide (CO) Maintenance State Implementation Plan (SIP)for the City ofLowell
. Notice ofthe Public Hearing on the proposed revision to theMassachusetts CO Maintenance SIP

for the City ofLowell was published at least 30 days prior to the public hearing inthe following newspaper on the following date: Boston Globe November 22, 2008 The Notice specified the date, time and place of the public hearing concerning the proposed revision to the Massachusetts COMaintenance SIPfor the City ofLowell and that comments on the proposal would be accepted until 5:00 p.m . on January 14, 2009

. The Notice specified the location at which the proposed revision to the Massachusetts CO Maintenance SIPfor the City ofLowell was available for public inspection
. The proposed SIP revisionwas available at the locations stated in the Notice when the Notice was published, as well as at the public hearing
. The Notice was givento the U.S
. Environmental Protection Agency, to any affected local or pollution control agencies, and to all known potentially interested parties on or before the date of the public hearing
. The Public hearing was held on the following date and at the following location, pursuant to the above Notice and in conformance with M .G.L
. Chapter 30A and the provisions of 40 CFR 51 .4(b) : December 30, 2008 at 10a.m . MassDEP Boston Office 

### One Winter Street Boston, MA 02108

ATTEST: MassDEP

Boston Hearing Officer Kenneth Sandal Date
Exhibit 10(dd)


 


October 28, 1998


 


 


Mr. Arthur G. Meyer


MacGregor Park


 


Dear Art,


 


It is my pleasure to tell you
that effective January 1, 1999, you are included in DPL’s executive health
care plan. As well as providing current full medical benefits, this program
also ensures that you will have complete medical benefits during your lifetime.


 


The enclosed packet provides
all the necessary information. If you have any questions, please call Jeanne
Holihan.


 


I appreciate your continued
contributions to our Company.


 


Best regards,


 


 


Allen M. Hill


President and


Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting.

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development (#1199).                    

*Date and Time:*                         October 24, 2000: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; October 25, 2000: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Arlington and Towers, 950 North Stafford Street, Arlington, VA 22203.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Larry S. Scadden, Program Directors, Human Resource Development Division, Room 815, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: (703) 292-8636.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate formal proposals submitted to the Program for Persons with Disabilities.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: October 16, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-26984 Filed 10-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Compensatory Arrangements with Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.10.1 
 Compensatory Arrangements with Executive Officers 
 Compensation for executives at TECO Energy, Inc. (the
“Corporation”) consists of several components. Included among these are base salary and an annual incentive award program. 
 Base salary
information for named executive officers for 2006 is set forth in the table below. 
 The Corporation’s annual incentive plan, last amended in 2002, is
included as Exhibit 10.3 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K to which this document is an exhibit (the “Report”). The 2006 target award percentages for awards under the annual incentive plan for the named executive
officers are set forth in the table below. 
 Compensatory arrangements relating to other aspects of the Corporation’s executive compensation program
are included as exhibits to the Report. 
 Named Executive Officer Salary and Target Award Percentage Information for 2006 
  

										
	 Name
	  	 Title
	  	Salary	 	 	Target    
Award %	 
	Sherrill W. Hudson	  	Chairman and CEO	  	$	775,000	*	 	70	%
	John B. Ramil	  	President and Chief Operating Officer	  	$	500,000	 	 	65	%
	Gordon L. Gillette	  	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	  	$	427,000	 	 	55	%
	Charles R. Black	  	President of Tampa Electric	  	$	345,000	 	 	50	%
	William N. Cantrell	  	President of Peoples Gas System	  	$	345,000	 	 	40	%



	*	Mr. Hudson’s 2006 salary consists of $250,000 in cash and TECO Energy restricted shares valued at $525,000, with the restrictions lapsing in four quarterly installments.
Mr. Hudson also receives a monthly housing and travel allowance of $5,000, in recognition of his retaining his primary residence in Miami.
[No. 35381.

Department Two.

July 14, 1960.]

#### E. D. Martin, *Appellant,*v. Foss Launch & Tug Co., Inc., *Respondent.**1*

*Guttormsen, Scholfield, Willits & Ager,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 354 P. (2d) 24.

Per Curiam.

— The motion to remand, which came on for hearing May 13, 1960, is hereby granted solely upon the ground of newly discovered evidence, and the case is hereby remanded to the superior court of King county, Department No. 2, with instructions to hear and rule upon respondent’s motion for a new trial (limited solely to the issue of damages) based upon the aforesaid ground. We express no opinion as to whether respondent’s motion for a new trial, when presented to the superior court, should be granted or denied. We simply grant permission to the superior court to entertain such motion and exercise its own judicial discretion in the premises.
#### FIELD v. STATE.

No. 26418.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 6, 1953.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

. The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

*441All the proceedings appearing regular and nothing being presented for our review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. ...
EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       State or Other
                                                                       Jurisdiction of           Percentage
                                                                       Incorporation             Ownership
                                                                       ---------------           ----------
Parent
------

<S>                                                                    <C>                        <C>
BCSB Bankcorp, Inc.                                                    United States


Subsidiary (1)
----------

Baltimore County Savings Bank, F.S.B.                                  United States               100%


Subsidiaries of Baltimore County Savings Bank, F.S.B. (1)
----------------------------------------------------

Baltimore County Service Corp.                                         United States               100%
Ebenezer Road, Inc.                                                    United States               100%

<FN>
_____________
(1)      The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included
         in the consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report
         to Stockholders attached hereto as Exhibit 13.
</FN>
</TABLE>
#### WEAVER et al. v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WILSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. et al.

No. A-370.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Nov. 22, 1944.

Truett Smith, of Tahoka, -and Underwood, Johnson, Dooley & Wilson and J. B. Dooley, all of Amarillo, for appellants.

Nelson & Brown, of Lubbock, for ap-pellee.

ALEXANDER, Chief Justice.

In the above cause the Court of Civil Appeals has certified certain questions of law to this Court. The appeal is from an interlocutory order of the trial court refusing an application for a temporary injunction in a school consolidation case. The main action is not one over which the jurisdiction of the Court of Civil Appeals is made final by the provisions of Article 1821, R.C.S., Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 1821. It has been held by this Court that under the provisions of Revised Statutes Article 4662 the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to review, by writ of error, the ruling of the trial court in granting or refusing a temporary injunction where the main case out of which the application for injunction grew is one over which the Supreme Court has jurisdiction. Houston Oil Co. of Tex*444as v. Village Mills Co., 109 Tex. 169, 202 S.W. 725; Spence v. Fenchler, 107 Tex. 443, 449, 180 S.W. 597; 24 Tex.Jur. 286, § 230.

Under these circumstances it is the general policy of this Court, as authorized by Rule 461 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, that in the absence of circumstances which would make it more expedient that the case be presented on certified questions rather than on application for writ of error, we will decline to allow such cases to be presented to the Court on certified questions. Duval v. Clark, 138 Tex. 186, 157 S.W.2d 626.

There are two reasons why we think we should follow the policy above indicated. In the first place, in the vast majority of cases the judgment finally rendered by the Court of Civil Appeals is correct, and it becomes unnecessary for this Court to grant an application for writ of error. In the second place, in many instances it is impracticable for the Court of Civil Appeals to so present the case on certified questions as to enable this Court to finally dispose of it. See in this connection Rains v. Mercantile National Bank, Tex.Sup., 182 S.W.2d 993; County Democratic Executive Committee v. Booker, 122 Tex. 89, 52 S.W.2d 908; Uvalde Rock Asphalt Co. v. Hightower, 135 Tex. 410, 144 S.W.2d 533.

The certificate is dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3027 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3027

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
442 Miller Valley Road in Prescott, Arizona, as the ``Barry M. Goldwater 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. BARRY M. GOLDWATER POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 442 Miller Valley Road in Prescott, Arizona, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Barry M. Goldwater Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Barry M. 
Goldwater Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
NO. 12-13-00001-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

D.B. PARSON AND BRIDGET PARSON, § APPEAL FROM THE 392ND

APPELLANTS

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SANDRA ROLLINS, WILLIE PARSON,

TOMMY PARSON AND FLORA MAE

PARSON JOHNSON,

APPELLEES § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). 

Appellants, D.B. Parson and Bridget Parson, perfected their appeal on January 3, 2013. The 

clerk’s record was filed on January 31, 2013. Appellants failed to pay or make arrangements to 

pay for the reporter’s record, and on February 21, 2013, the appeal was ordered submitted on the 

clerk’s record alone. The order also included a notice that Appellants’ brief was due on or before 

March 20, 2013. However, Appellants did not file a brief.

On March 22, 2013, Appellants were notified that their brief was due to have been filed 

on or before March 20, 2013, but that neither a brief nor a motion for extension of time had been 

filed with the court. Appellants were further informed that the appeal could be dismissed for 

want of prosecution unless, no later than April 1, 2013, Appellants filed a motion for extension 

of time to file the brief, containing a reasonable explanation for their failure to file it and 

showing that Appellee had not suffered material injury thereby. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8. 

The April 1, 2013 deadline for filing Appellants’ motion for extension of time has passed, 

and Appellants have not filed the requested motion. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for 
2

want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3.(b). All pending objections are 

overruled as moot.

Opinion delivered April 10, 2013.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
3

COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

APRIL 10, 2013

NO. 12-13-00001-CV

D.B. PARSON AND BRIDGET PARSON,

Appellants

V.

SANDRA ROLLINS, WILLIE PARSON, TOMMY PARSON

AND FLORA MAE PARSON JOHNSON,

Appellees

_____________________________________________________________________________

 Appeal from the 392nd Judicial District Court

 of Henderson County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No.2012B-0596)

_____________________________________________________________________________

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that since the appellant has filed no brief in this 

cause, the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution; and that this decision 

be certified to the trial court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
Exhibit 10.12


    Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Buenos Aires, June 30, 2003

Securities and  Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:


The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Leonardo Federici Guedes, who
is the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Localiza
Master Franchisee Argentina S.A., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.   the Annual Report on Form 20-F (the "Report") fully complies with the
     requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934; and
2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Localiza
     Master Franchisee Argentina S.A.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Localiza Master
Franchisee Argentina S.A. and will be retained by Localiza Master Franchisee
Argentina S.A. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                             /s/ Leonardo Federici Guedes
                                             ----------------------------
                                             Name: Leonardo Federici Guedes
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3096 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 60
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3096

                          [Report No. 113-235]

      To designate the building occupied by the Federal Bureau of 
  Investigation located at 801 Follin Lane, Vienna, Virginia, as the 
           ``Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2013

    Mr. Connolly (for himself, Mr. Hanna, Mr. Wolf, and Mr. Moran) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

                           September 27, 2013

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To designate the building occupied by the Federal Bureau of 
  Investigation located at 801 Follin Lane, Vienna, Virginia, as the 
           ``Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center''.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The building occupied by the Federal Bureau of Investigation 
located at 801 Follin Lane, Vienna, Virginia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center'' 
during the period in which the building is occupied by the Federal 
Bureau of Investigation.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    During the period in which the building referred to in section 1 is 
occupied by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, any reference in a 
law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
States to that building shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center''.
                                                  House Calendar No. 60

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3096

                          [Report No. 113-235]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

      To designate the building occupied by the Federal Bureau of 
  Investigation located at 801 Follin Lane, Vienna, Virginia, as the 
           ``Michael D. Resnick Terrorist Screening Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 27, 2013

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen K. Gartside, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report of Evolving Systems, Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Evolving Systems, Inc.

/s/
Stephen K. Gartside, Jr.

Stephen
K. Gartside, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2005

---



QuickLinks
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BETHLEHEM AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

v.

THE BOARD OF REVENUE APPEALS OF 

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY AND LEHIGH 

CROSSING ASSOCIATES, LP

PETITION OF: LEHIGH CROSSING 

ASSOCIATES, LP

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 66 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

BETHLEHEM AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

v.

THE BOARD OF REVENUE APPEALS OF 

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY AND LEHIGH 

CROSSING ASSOCIATES, LP

PETITION OF: LEHIGH CROSSING 

ASSOCIATES, LP

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 67 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Intervistas, Department of Transportation Advisory Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection
#### H. J. LETTERMAN v. STATE.

No. 22517.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 19, 1943.

Eugene F. Mathis, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a penalty assessed of one year in the county jail for a violation of the liquor laws.

Reference is had to Letterman v. State, Tex.Cr.R., 171 S.W.2d 349 against the same appellant, this day decided, for a discussion of the questions presented by the appeal and the conclusion which we reach.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1616

_____________________________ S AMUEL J. C HESTNUT , Appellant,

v.

F LORIDA D EPARTMENT OF C ORRECTIONS , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Karen Gievers , Judge

. March 29, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R OWE , and M AKAR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Samuel J. Chestnut, pro se
, Appellant.

Eric Salvatore Giunta, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.