alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11.1

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
AG-CHEM EQUIPMENT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The per share computations are based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the periods.

                                                      Three Months Ended
                                                         December 31,
                                                         ------------
                                                    1998             1997
                                                 ---------         ---------

Shares outstanding at beginning of period            9,640             9,670

Repurchase and retirement of common stock              (13)               (3)
                                                 ---------         ---------

Shares outstanding at end of period                  9,627             9,667
                                                 =========         =========

Weighted average shares outstanding                  9,639             9,670
                                                 =========         =========

Net loss                                         $    (356)        $  (1,095)
                                                 =========         =========

Loss per common share                            $   (0.04)        $   (0.11)
                                                 =========         =========


The Company has no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding.


                                       14
Exhibit 10.1


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  2005 Bonus

  	
   

  	
  2006 Base Salary

  	
   

  	
  2006 Target Bonus

  (% of Base Salary)(1)

  	
   

  
	
  Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Henry
  E. Blair

  Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  170,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  500,000

  	
   

  	
  45.0

  	
  %

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Thomas
  R. Beck, M.D.

  President and Chief Operating Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  59,500

  	
  (2)

  	
  $

  	
  340,000

  	
   

  	
  42.5

  	
  %

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Stephen
  S. Galliker

  Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  93,617

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  291,870

  	
   

  	
  37.5

  	
  %

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Clive
  R. Wood, Ph.D.

  Executive Vice President Discovery Research and Chief Scientific Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  76,312

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  300,000

  	
   

  	
  35.0

  	
  %

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Ivana
  Magovcevic - Liebisch, Ph.D., J.D.

  General Counsel and Executive Vice President, Corporate Communications

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  81,180

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  291,870

  	
   

  	
  35.0

  	
  %

  



 






(1) 
The target bonus opportunity can be exceeded by up to 20% of the target for
exceptional performance. For example, an executive with a target bonus of 30%
who has outstanding performance can receive a bonus of as much as 36% of base
salary. 


 


(2) 
Reflects pro-rated bonus for Dr.Beck’s services as Dyax’s Executive Vice
President, Business and Product Development from June to December 2005.


 


1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 6242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2738]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Computer-Communications Research Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Computer-Communications Research 
(1192).
    Date/Time: March 2 and 3, 2000; 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Yechezkel Zalcstein, Program Director, 
Theory of Computing Program, CISE/C-CR, Room 1145, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. (703) 306-
1914.
    Purpose of Meeting: to provide advice and recommendations for 
the Theory of Computing Program (TOC) by providing review of 
approximately 60 proposals with special attention to changing 
emphasis for that program.
    Agenda: Review and evaluate TOC proposals as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 1, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-2738 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6247

BETTY JEAN MURPHY-BARBER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. J. MURRAY, Camp Administrator; PATRICIA

PEOPLES; WARDEN HADDEN; BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Agency of the Department of Justice,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CA-95-1030-BR)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 1, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Betty Jean Murphy-Barber, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

her civil rights action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)

(1988). In her complaint, Appellant alleged a discriminatory and

retaliatory institutional transfer, deliberate indifference to

serious medical needs, denial of access to courts, and denial of

the right to have prejudicial erroneous information removed from

her prison file. The district court properly dismissed the claims

against Patricia Peoples and Bureau of Prisons because they are not

persons subject to suit under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

The district court dismissed the remaining claims as frivolous

under § 1915(d), based on Appellant's failure to allege certain

facts or to support her claims with evidence. Because Appellant

may be able to particularize her complaint to state non-frivolous

claims arising from the events described in the complaint, see

Coleman v. Peyton, 340 F.2d 603, 604 (4th Cir. 1965), we modify the

district court's order to reflect that the dismissal is without

prejudice and affirm that disposition. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
Exhibit 10.8

NINTH AMENDMENT

THIS NINTH AMENDMENT(the "Amendment") is made and entered into as of the 16th day of April, 2002,
by and betweenEOP-110 ATRIUM PLACE, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company("Landlord"), and CLICK2LEARN, INC., a Delaware corporation("Tenant").

RECITALS

NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:

1

---





2

---

Months of Term
or Period

Annual Rate
Per Square Foot

Annual
Base Rent

Monthly
Base Rent04/01/0210/31/03

$
28.00

$
65,408.04

$
5,450.67




Period

Annual Rate
Per Square Foot

Annual
Base Rent

Monthly
Base Rent05/01/0210/31/02

$
25.75

$
883,559.76

$
73,629.9811/01/0210/31/03

$
26.50

$
909,294.48

$
75,774.54




VIII.Improvements to Expansion Space.



3

---





4

---





XIII.Miscellaneous.



5

---



[SIGNATURES ARE ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

6

---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.

| |  | LANDLORD:
EOP-ATRIUM PLACE, L.L.C.,
a Delaware limited liability company
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |                                                                         
| |  | By:                                                                     
| |  |                                                                         
| |  |                                                                         
| |  |                                                                         
| |  |                                                                         
| |  |                                                                         
| |  | TENANT:
CLICK2LEARN, INC.,
a Delaware corporation                       
| |  |                                                                         
| |  | By:                                                                     
| |  | Name:                                                                   
| |  | Title:                                                                  

7

---

EXHIBIT AOUTLINE AND LOCATION OF REDUCTION SPACE

8

---

EXHIBIT BOUTLINE AND LOCATION OF EXPANSION SPACE

9

---

QuickLinks
#### COOPER v. STATE.

No. 23846.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 17, 1947.

Richard F. Stovall, of Floydada, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

The judgment recites that appellant “appeared in person” and entered his plea of guilty to selling intoxicating liquor in a dry area, and was fined $100.

Upon a hearing on motion for new trial the County Judge testified that the recital in the judgment that appellant “appeared in person” was not correct; that his appearance was neither in person nor by attorney, but was by the sheriff, who assumed to act under a general “power of attorney” from appellant directed to no particular person, and purporting to authorize the holder to enter the plea of guilty for appellant. Orderly procedure would condemn such practice. Appellant’s contention was that he was not guilty, and that he signed the purported power of attorney because he was told to do so by the officers, and that he thought it was only an admission by him that liquor and money found by the officers were his, and that he did not authorize anyone to plead guilty for him, and did not know that such plea had been entered until the next day; that as soon as he found it out he immediately contacted an attorney to represent him. We note some authorities cited by appellant in his brief as follows: Ex parte Williamson, 76 Tex.Cr.R. 639, 177 S.W. 89; Ex parte Grimes, 81 Tex.Cr.R. 405, 195 S.W. 858; Love v. State, 71 Tex.Cr.R. 259, 158 S.W. 532; Ex parte Super, 76 Tex.Cr.R. 415, 175 S.W. 697; Meeking v. State, 67 Tex.Cr.R. 69, 148 S.W. 309; Ex parte Jones, 46 Tex.Cr.R. 433, 80 S.W. 995; Deen v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 194 S.W.2d 1007.

The punishment prescribed by Art. 666-41, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., as amended by Acts 48th Leg., p. 518, for selling whiskey in a dry area is by fine of not less than $100 nor more than $1,000 or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

Art. 580,'C.C.P., reads as follows:

> “In all prosecutions for felonies, the defendant must be personally present at the trial, and he must likewise be present in all cases of misdemeanor when the punishment or any part thereof is imprisonment in jail.”

No attorney was present representing appellant when the plea of guilty was entered. .If there had been and the plea had been entered by him for appellant, the punishment assessed being a fine only, a question might be presented as to .the judgment, a jail penalty not being mandatory. Cain et al. v. State, 15 Tex.App. 41; Davis v. State, 70 Tex.Cr.R. 563, 158 S.W. 283. Under the circumstances here shown, and the prompt action of appellant when he learned that a plea of guilty had been entered for him in his absence and without counsel, the trial court should have granted a new trial. See Cramer v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 213, 109 S.W.2d 1054, and other cases heretofore cited.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                         
<ARTICLE>                                 5                    
<LEGEND>                                                       
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>                                                      
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000    
                                                               
<S>                                        <C>            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS                 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997          
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996           
<CASH>                                          32,925            
<SECURITIES>                                         0            
<RECEIVABLES>                                  317,809            
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,418             
<INVENTORY>                                    283,102             
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               687,771             
<PP&E>                                         682,602             
<DEPRECIATION>                                 374,759            
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,270,151             
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          286,657             
<BONDS>                                        202,283             
<COMMON>                                       203,302             
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0             
<PREFERRED>                                          0             
<OTHER-SE>                                     488,677             
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,270,151             
<SALES>                                              0             
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               440,115             
<CGS>                                                0             
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  248,843             
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0             
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0             
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,736             
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,405             
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,690             
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,715             
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0             
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0             
<CHANGES>                                            0             
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,715             
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.69          
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69             
                                                               

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.2


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to Integrated Healthcare Holdings, Inc.'s 2006
Stock Incentive Plan, of our report dated July 11, 2006 relating to our audit of
the consolidated financial statements of Integrated Healthcare Holdings, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2005, which includes an explanatory paragraph
concerning uncertainty about the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern, contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended March 31, 2008.



/s/ RAMIREZ INTERNATIONAL
Financial & Accounting Services, Inc.
July 11, 2008
Irvine, California
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 205 (Monday, October 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27115]



[[Page 63231]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Intergovernmental Advisory Committee (IAC) will meet on 
November 2, 2000, at the Hilton Hotel, 921 SW 6th Avenue, Portland, 
Oregon 97204-1296. The purpose of the meeting is to continue 
discussions on the implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan (NFP). 
The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and continue until 3:30 p.m. Agenda 
items to be discussed include, but are not limited to: orientation for 
new IAC members, the status of the Survey and Manage Final Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement, and progress reports on ongoing NFP-
related implementation issues.
    The IAC meeting will be open to the public and is fully accessible 
for people with disabilities, Interpreters are available upon request 
in advance. Written comments may be submitted for the record at the 
meeting. Time will also be scheduled for oral public comments. 
Interested persons are encourage to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding this meeting may 
be directed to Steve Odell, Executive Director, Regional Ecosystem 
Office, 333 SW 1st Avenue, P.O. Box 3623, Portland, OR 97208 (Phone: 
503-808-2166).

    Dated: October 16, 2000.
Stephen J. Odell,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 00-27115 Filed 10-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
EXHIBIT 17.3



           Certifications of the CEO and CFO Pursuant to Section 906
                      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of DataMirror Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the year ended January 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Nigel Stokes as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Peter Cauley as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of his knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
          of the Company.

Date:  June 5, 2003

By: /s/Nigel Stokes
    ------------------------
Nigel Stokes
Chief Executive Officer


By:/s/Peter Cauley
   ------------------------
Peter Cauley
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. as of
September 30, 1997, and for the nine months then ended, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          47,220
<SECURITIES>                                    36,184
<RECEIVABLES>                                  180,450
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,982
<INVENTORY>                                     57,683
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               382,869
<PP&E>                                       3,199,309
<DEPRECIATION>                                 979,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,661,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          790,959
<BONDS>                                      1,228,175
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              279
<PREFERRED>                                     28,217
<COMMON>                                        61,328
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,906,951
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,661,071
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,070,371
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,024,167
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (67,149)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 52,774
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,317
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,457
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,457
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
        

</TABLE>
#### JOANNE MARANDINO *v.*MARANDINO’S ET AL.

*Harold J. Geragosian,*in support of the petition.

*Ellen M. Aspell,*in opposition.

Decided July 2, 1998

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 916 (AC 17060), is denied.
<PAGE>   1


                  EXHIBIT 21.1 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                Other Names Under Which
              Subsidiary              Jurisdiction of Incorporation          Such Subsidiary Does Business
<S>                                          <C>                                         <C>

GCW Holdings, Inc.                               Delaware                                None

Costura Dominicana, Inc.                         Delaware                                None

GCI IP Sub, Inc.                                 Delaware                                None

Auburn Hosiery Mills, Inc                        Kentucky                                None

GCI Spainco, S.L.                                 Spain                                  None

Sport Socks Co. (Ireland) Ltd.                   Ireland                                 None

Sport Socks Co. (UK) Limited                  United Kingdom                             None

Sport Socks Co. (Belgium) BVBA                   Belgium                                 None

Gerber Childrenswear Canada, Inc.                Delaware                                None

Costura Matamoros S.A. de C.V.                    Mexico                                 None

GCW Mexico S.A. de C.V.                           Mexico                                 None

</TABLE>