SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V) SIP Submitted by: District ofColumbia

Date Submitted: January, 2010 Subject: Revision to the District ofColumbia’s State Implementation Plan Transportation Conformity Regulation Completeness Review Completed by: Martin Kotsch Date Completed: February 25, 2010

Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) 1. A formal letter ofsubmittal from the Governor orhis 1. Letter dated January 26, 2010 from Maureen McGowan, Y designee, requesting EPA approval ofthe plan or revision Interim Director, District ofColumbia Department ofthe thereof. Environment to Shawn M. Garvin, EPA Region 3 Regional Administrator, submitting the proposed SIP revision. 2. Evidence thatthe State has adopted the plan in the State code 2. State submitted SIP entitled “Air Quality State Y or body ofregulations; or issued the permit, order, consent ImplementationPlan Transportation Conformity Regulations” agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date dated January 8, 2010 and letter dated January 26, 2010 from ofadoption or final issuance as well as the effective date ofthe Maureen McGowan, Interim Director, District ofColumbia plan, ifdifferent from the adoption/issuance date. Department ofthe Environmentto Shawn M. Garvin, EPA Region 3 Regional Administrator, submitting the proposed SIP revision. 3. Evidence thatthe State has the necessary legal authority 3. Previously provided in prior SIP submissions. Y under State law to adopt and implementthe plan.

4. A copy ofactual regulation, or document submitted for 4. State submitted SIP entitled “Air Quality State Y approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including Implementation Plan Transportation Conformity Regulations” indication ofthe changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy ofthe official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by theEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date ofthe regulationldocurnent shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 5. Evidence that the State followed all ofthe procedural 5. The district followed the appropriate Federal and district Y requirements ofthe States laws and constitution in conducting requirements in adopting the SIP revision certified by letter and completing the adoptionlissuance ofthe plan. dated January 26, 2010 from Maureen McGowan, Interim Director, District ofColumbia Department ofthe Environment to Shawn M. Garvin, EPA Region 3 Regional Administrator, submitting the proposed SIP revision. 6. Evidence that public notice was given ofthe proposed 6. Copies ofthe public notice are included in the SIP Y change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including submission the date ofpublication ofsuch notice. 7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance 7. A public hearing was held on May 26. 2009 in accordance Y with the information provided in the public notice and the with districtregulations as evidenced by hearing and letter States laws and constitution, ifapplicable, dated January 26, 2010 from Maureen McGowan, Interim Director, District ofColumbia Department ofthe Environment to Shawn M. Garvin, EPA Region 3 Regional Administrator, submitting the proposed SIP revision. 8. Compilation ofpublic comments and the State’s response 8. No comments were received on the SIP update. Y thereto. 1. Identification ofall regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. NOx, VOCs, CO, and PM2.5 are the four identified Y regulatedpollutants affectedby the plan. 2. Identification ofthe locations ofaffected sources including 2. SIP affects all non-attainment areas with inthe district that Y the EPA attainment/nonattainmentdesignation ofthe locations are requiredto do transportation conformity and the status ofthe attainment plan forthe affected area(s). 3. Quantification ofthe changes inplan allowable emissions 3. N/A N/A from the affected sources; estimates ofchanges in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification ofchanges in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations ofthe differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as aresultEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) ofthe revision. 4. The State’s demonstrationthat the national ambient air 4. Adhering to the Conformity SIP requirements within each Y quality standards, prevention ofsignificant deterioration non-attainment area will continue to ensure that future new increments, reasonable furtherprogress demonstration, and proposed transportationprojects will not result in on-road visibility, as applicable, are protected ifthe plan is approved mobile source emissions contributing to the deterioration or and implemented. cause the failure to meet an attainment goal for any pollutant. 5. Modeling information required to supportthe proposed 5. Modeling is not required under this SIP. N/A revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring dataused, meteorological dataused, ustification foruse ofoffsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and otherinformation relevantto the determination ofadequacy ofthe modeling analysis. 6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are 6. N/A N/A based on continuous emission reduction technology. 7. Evidence thatthe plan contains emission limitations, work 7. SIP requires non-attainment areas to do conformity analyses Y practice standards and recordkeeping/reportingrequirements, whenrequired under40 CFR Part 93 and reportresults to EPA where necessary, to ensure emission levels, to ensure mobile source emissionbudgets are not exceeded by construction ofnew transportationprojects within the nonattainment area. 8. Compliance/enforcement strategie’s, including how 8. Conformity requirements will be met in each non-attainment Y compliance will be determined inpractice. area as specifiedunder40 CFR Part 93 whichregulates how new proposed transportation projects mustmeet conformity requirements prior to getting Federal approval and funding. 9. Special economic and technologicaljustifications required 9.N/A N/A by any applicable EPApolicies. (Ifapolicy is not appropriate, explain why.)

10. A Section 107 requestmustbe accompaniedby a 10.N/A N/A maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years afterredesignation.