alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP96-129-000 (Phase II)]

Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened in these proceedings on November 1, 2000 commencing at 10:00 a.m. at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, for the purpose of exploring the possible settlement of the issues in this proceeding.

Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).

For additional information, contact Marc G. Denkinger (202) 208-2215 or Lorna J. Hadlock (202) 208-0737.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-27274 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-50242

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MANUEL CARRASCO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CR-31-1

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Manuel Carrasco has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Carrasco has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-50242 Document: 00512473875 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
No. 13-50242

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-50242 Document: 00512473875 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
Group 4 – Google’s Responsive Claim Construction Brief 

(Civil Case Nos. 6:20-cv-00572-ADA, 6:20-cv-00581-ADA, and 6:20-cv-00582-ADA) 

EXHIBIT #6 

Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-6 Filed 02/12/21 Page 1 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-6 Filed 02/12/21 Page 2 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-6 Filed 02/12/21 Page 3 of 4
Case 6:20-cv-00572-ADA Document 34-6 Filed 02/12/21 Page 4 of 4
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3227 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 477
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3227

                          [Report No. 113-637]

  To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 
                 certain properties in South Carolina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2013

  Mr. Rice of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

                            December 1, 2014

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on October 
                                1, 2013]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 
                 certain properties in South Carolina.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF PROPERTIES IN SOUTH CAROLINA FROM JOHN H. CHAFEE 
              COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--The map subtitled ``Huntington Beach Unit SC-03'' 
included in the sets of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier Resources 
System'' referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources 
Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to the Huntington Beach Unit in 
South Carolina is hereby replaced by another map relating to the same 
unit entitled ``John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 
Corrected Huntington Beach Unit SC-03'' dated September 30, 2014.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep each 
map revised under subsection (a) on file and available for inspection 
in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act 
(16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                                 Union Calendar No. 477

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3227

                          [Report No. 113-637]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 
                 certain properties in South Carolina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            December 1, 2014

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 209 (Friday, October 27, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27635]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3302]


State of Florida

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 
October 4, 2000, I find that Broward, Collier, Miami-Dade, and Monroe 
Counties in the State of Florida constitute a disaster area due to 
damages caused by severe storms and flooding beginning on October 3, 
2000, and continuing. Applications for loans for physical damage as a 
result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on 
December 3, 2000 and for economic injury until the close of business on 
July 5, 2001 at the address listed below or other locally announced 
locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, 
One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the contiguous counties of Hendry, Lee, and Palm 
Beach in the State of Florida may be filed until the specified date at 
the above location.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere...............        7.375
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere............        3.687
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere...............        8.000
  Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit           4.000
   Available Elsewhere.....................................
  Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit          6.750
   Available Elsewhere.....................................
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without           4.000
   Credit Available Elsewhere..............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The numbers assigned to this disaster are 330206 for physical 
damage and 9J3200 for economic injury.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: October 6, 2000.
Allan I. Hoberman,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-27635 Filed 10-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
TEDDY SHAWN STOKES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3104

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 4, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

Teddy Shawn Stokes, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lauren L. Gonzalez, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Opinion filed July 26, 2018



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

______ _ ___ No. 11

- 1 8

- 00 191

- C V

__________ IN RE CURTIS TEER

Original Mandamus Proceeding

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Curtis Teer , Relator , has filed a n original mandamus proceeding in this court

. Relator asserts that the Honorable Rodney W. Satterwhite, the jud ge of the 441st
Judicial D istrict C ourt of Midland Cou nty , violated Relator’s due process rights when he issued an order to withdraw $6, 523.01 from Relator’s inmate trust fund for the payment of attorney’s fees and court costs

. Relator asserts that there is a discrepancy of $2,670.75; he also states that he was determined to be indigent in the underlying case and that, therefore, the $3,186.76 in court

- appointed attorney’s fees should not have been assessed against him

. Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial
court ha s clearly abused its discretion and that the relator has no adequate remedy2

by appeal

. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.
, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) ( orig. proceeding) ; Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding)

. Relator here has not shown that he has no adequate remedy by appeal.
We agree with Relator that a notice or order to withdraw funds is not a n appealable order

. See Harrell v. State , 286 S.W.3d 315, 316 n.1, 321 (Tex. 2009) (“withdrawal order” is actual ly a notification from the court, not an order). However, an order ruling on a motion to strike or rescind an order to withdraw
inmate funds would be appealable. See id. at 3 2 1. To his petition, Re lator has attached a copy of a motion to rescind, addres sed to the trial court. The motion to rescind and the petition for writ of mandamus reflect that Relator executed these
docum ents within days of each other. If the motion to rescind has been filed in the trial court, Relator is entitled to a ruling on that motion. However, Relator did not
attach to his petition a file

- stamped copy of the motion to rescind, nor has he asked
this court to direct the trial cou rt to rule on his motion to rescind. Relator’s relief lies in the motion to rescind and, if necessary, an appeal from a denial of the motion
to rescind. See id. Because Relator has an adequate remedy by appeal, he has not
demonstrated that he is entitle d to mandamus relief

. See Walker , 827 S.W.2d at 842; In re Mendoza
, No. 05

- 16

- 00383

- CV, 2016 WL 1469593, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas
A pr. 14, 2016, orig. proceeding ) (mem. op.). Accordingly, w e deny Relator ’ s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CU RIAM July 26 , 2018
Panel consists of: Willson, J.
, Bailey, J. , and Wright, S.C.J. 1

1 J im R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp
                                CFO Certification                   Exhibit 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Tel-Instrument  Electronics
Corp. (the "Company"),  on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Joseph P. Macaluso,  Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge and based on my review of the Report:

            1.    the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.    the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

                                              By: /s/ Joseph P. Macaluso
                                                  ----------------------
                                                  Joseph P. Macaluso
                                                  Principal Accounting Officer

                                                    February 13, 2004

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Tel-Instrument  Electronics  Corp  and will be  retained  by
Tel-Instrument  Electronics  Corp and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23









CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
--------------------------------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-42859 of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch Preferred Capital Trust
III, Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P., Merrill Lynch Preferred Capital
Trust IV and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P. on Form S-3 of our reports
dated March 29, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merrill
Lynch Preferred Capital Trust III and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.
for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


New York, New York
March 29, 2005
#### McGOWAN v. STATE.

No. 26215.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 4, 1953.

Joe H. Jones, Dallas, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn,: State’s Atty., of Austin for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The'!offense is the unlawful transportation of wine in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $500.

In view of our disposition of the case, a' recitation of the facts is tiot deemed necessary. •• • - -

The trial court permitted the State to introduce before the jury the search warrant and the affidavit therefor, together with evidence that the accused was known to be a bootlegger. None of such evidence was admissible before the jury. The jury should have been retired when the evidence was heard by the court on the issues of the legality of the search warrant and the existence of probable cause authorizing the search of the automobile.

At the conclusion of the testimony, the appellant moved the court to withdraw the same from the jury. The motion was overruled, and the appellant excepted.

In refusing to grant the motion, the court fell into error, which calls for a reversal of this cause. Byars v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 515, 229 S.W.2d 169, and Walker v. State, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 321, 174 S.W.2d 974.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6337

JOHN HENRY WEST, III, Petitioner - Appellant, versusWARDEN, RED ONION STATE PRISON; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-99-60) Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Alan Epstein, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Marla Graff Decker, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John Henry West, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See West v. Warden, Red Onion State Prison , No. CA-99-60 (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

The Board of Directors
Extendicare Health Services, Inc.:

     Under date of February 6, 2004, we reported on the consolidated balance
sheets of Extendicare Health Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which are included in the Company's
2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In connection with our audits of the
aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related
consolidated financial statement schedule as listed in Item 14. The financial
statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statement schedule
based on our audits.

     In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

     As discussed in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements, the
Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill effective January 1, 2002.

                                          [KPMG LLP LOGO]

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
February 6, 2004
[Anderson Associates, LLP Letterhead]







     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration  statement
of BCSB Bankcorp,  Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-53295 and File No.  333-85025)
of our  report  dated  November  16,  2001  on our  audits  of the  consolidated
financial  statements of BCSB Bankcorp,  Inc. as of September 30, 2001 and 2000,
and for each of the two years in the period  ended  September  30,  2001,  which
report has been incorporated by reference in BCSB Bankcorp, Inc.'s Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                                               /s/ Anderson Associates, LLP


Baltimore, Maryland
December 27, 2001
GECC Exhibit 4o


    

      Exhibit
        4(o)

       

      


       

      March
        3,
        2006

       

      Securities
        and Exchange Commission

      100
        F.
        Street, N.E.

      Washington,
        D.C. 20549

       

      
        	
                Subject:
                   

                 

              	
                General
                  Electric Capital Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
                  fiscal
                  year ended 
December 31, 2005 - File No.
                  1-6461

              


      

      


       

      Dear
        Sirs:

       

      Neither
        General Electric Capital Corporation (the “Corporation”) nor any of its
        subsidiaries has outstanding any instrument with respect to its long-term
        debt
        that is not registered or filed with the Commission and under which the total
        amount of securities authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets of the
        registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. In accordance with
        paragraph (b) (4) (iii) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K
        (17 CFR §229.601), the Corporation hereby agrees to furnish to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of each instrument
        which defines the rights of holders of such long-term debt not filed or
        incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Corporation’s Annual Report on
        Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

       

       

       

      
        	
                Very
                  truly yours,

                 

                GENERAL
                  ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION

                 

                 

                 

              
	
                By:
                  

              	
                /s/
                  Kathryn A. Cassidy

              	 
	 	
                Kathryn
                  A. Cassidy

                Senior
                  Vice President Corporate Treasury
and Global Funding
                  Operation