alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### PHILIP TRAFICONDA *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

*David B. Rozwaski,*in support of the petition.

Decided May 26, 1998

The petitioner Philip Traficonda’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 909 (AC 16947), is denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing
Owner), of World Monitor Trust  Series A (Series A), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series As Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series A.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley                          
|Maureen D. Howley                              
|Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President
|March 30, 2005
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3158 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require recipients of State 

Homeland Security Grant Program funding to promote preparedness 

and planning for manmade and natural disasters at educational institutions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2013 

Mr. PAYNE (for himself and Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require 

recipients of State Homeland Security Grant Program 

funding to promote preparedness and planning for manmade and natural disasters at educational institutions, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure America for 

5 Education in Our Schools Act’’ or the ‘‘SAFE in Our 

6 Schools Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3158 IH

1 SEC. 2. MINIMUM CONTENTS OF APPLICATION FOR CER2 TAIN HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT FUNDS. 

3 Section 2004(b)(2) of the Homeland Security Act of 

4 2002 (6 U.S.C. 605(b)(2)) is amended by redesignating 

5 subparagraphs (B) and (C) as paragraphs (C) and (D), 

6 respectively, and by inserting after subparagraph (A) the 

7 following: 

8 ‘‘(B) a certification that— 

9 ‘‘(i) the State requires each institution 

10 of education for kindergarten through 

11 twelfth grade to develop an emergency re12 sponse plan that includes provisions for— 

13 ‘‘(I) evacuation relocation; 

14 ‘‘(II) family-child reunification; 

15 ‘‘(III) children with special 

16 needs; and 

17 ‘‘(IV) addressing multiple disas18 ters; and 

19 ‘‘(ii) the State has adopted a strategy 

20 to ensure that each such institution devel21 ops a plan in accordance with clause (i) by 

22 the beginning of the academic year for 

23 2015 or September 1, 2015, whichever is 

24 earlier;’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
      32.2


**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Red Carpet Entertainment, Inc. a Nevada
        corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,
        2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
        (the "Report"), Ursula Sherwood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
        certifies to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
        adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Red Carpet Entertainment, Inc., and will be retained by Red Carpet
        Entertainment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
        or
        its staff upon request.
  By:
                      /s/ Ursula SherwoodUrsula
                            Sherwood
                          Chief
                            Financial Officer
                          March
                            30, 2007
#### AGNEW v. STATE.

No. 22511.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 19, 1943.

Alex P. Pope, of Tyler, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*370HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for operating an automobile on a public highway while appellant was intoxicated. Punishment was assessed at a fine of fifty dollars.

The complaint and information properly charge the offense. The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         February 23, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         3 pm to 5 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         Residence Inn, Conference Room, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Elsie D. Taylor, Scientific Review Administrator, Extramural Project Review Branch, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Suite 409, 6000 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-7003, 301-443-9787, etaylor@niaaa.nih.gov.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: February 1, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-2758 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3085 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3085

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 3349 West 111th Street in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``Captain Herbert 
                Johnson Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CAPTAIN HERBERT JOHNSON MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3349 West 111th Street in Chicago, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Captain Herbert Johnson Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Captain 
Herbert Johnson Memorial Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,349
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,273
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 1,429
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    216,492
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           9,482
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             9,020
<LOANS>                                        217,710
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 482,131
<DEPOSITS>                                     211,891
<SHORT-TERM>                                   215,180
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,027
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,915
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 482,131
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,141
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,819
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                27,960
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,896
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,217
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,743
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             109,847
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,418
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       952
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.10
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,378
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,378
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,684
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       41
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,643
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,643
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
OPPT -2013-0225 • 

Scanned & Processed in 

CIS by: PAULA 12/3/2014 

COMMENTS: DOCKET 
GENERAL CONTACT REPORT REGEl V_E t 

OPPT CB 

Q 

c 

Draft I Internal Deliberative 

I. Type of Contact (Telephone, Meeting, etc.): CBI? 20\~0EC-3 fll tO: 39 

Telephone Yes 

II. EPA Information 

Name(s) of EPA Rcpresentativc(s): Date/Time: 

Greg Fritz December 2012 

Division/Branch & Phone#: Contact Initiator? 

GF with EETD/ICB (202) 564-8583 Yes 

III. Second Party Information 

Name(s) of Second Party Representative(s): PMN Number I Topic: 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Form U Accession# 

Company & Phone #: Contact Initiator'! 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx No 

IV. Summary oflssues Discussed and Comments Received: 

The following chemistry issues were discussed after voicemail and email tag. 

Questions: A) In the 2012 CDR Form U you repmi Accession number 

xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Answer A] 

Q B) 

Answer B] 

Signature of EPA Official: Greg Fritz 

Date December 2012 

/+& L1ppT Zot36-L7s-Gp-<:.Or<'-Co C, 

\ 

g t\NITIZED
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________ 

 Project No.: 0172.07.029.040 DISTRIBUTION 

Page _1_ of __1_

Project Name: Steam Electric Rulemaking 

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD 

 Outgoing Call 

Date: 01/21/2010 Time: 3:00 pm EST 

Company Name: Headwaters Resources, Inc. 

Contact Name: Lance Staron 

Phone No.: 801-984-9453 

Name: Kurt Blohm, Elizabeth Sabol Eastern Research Group

GENERAL SUBJECT : Potential Changes to the Ash Handling Part of the Steam Electric ICR 

 

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN 

Kurt Blohm and I contacted Lance Staron, Headwaters Resources, Inc., on Thursday, January 21, to discuss the 

potential changes that EPA was considering making to Part C (Ash Handling) of the questionnaire. We talked 

with Mr. Staron regarding his thoughts about these potential changes. Below is a summary of the call. 

 

Mr. Staron stated that he thinks the ash handling system-level approach for Part C is a good idea. He stated that 

this change would avoid some confusion for plants in cases where one system services more than one unit or 

vice versa. Mr. Staron agreed that plants usually identify ash handling systems on a system level, not an electric 

generating unit level. 

Mr. Staron stated that he is unaware of any systems that pneumatically transfer and/or store both fly and bottom 

ash together. However, he made it clear that he mainly deals with fly ash handling systems and does not know 

all options regarding the bottom ash industry. He explained that facilities usually handle fly ash separately so 

they can market the ash. If a facility combined everything (i.e., bottom/economizer ash) with fly ash, the value 

would decrease drastically and the ash would fail the ASTM standard test for beneficial reuse. The combination 

of fly and bottom ash also changes the class of the ash. Mr. Staron explained the differences between Class C 

and Class F ash. 

Mr. Staron stated that during his review of the questionnaire, he did not see the request for the class of the fly 

ash. He suggested that we include a request for the class of the ash in Part C to help distinguish some of the 

properties of the ash. For example, he explained that Class C ash has more calcium and is hard to handle 

(especially if wet) than Class F ash.
#### Joe SPENDOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 22821.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 5, 1944.

C. O. McMillan, of Stephenville, for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin,, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for the sale of one pint of whisky to W. L. Hudson in a dry area and was assessed a fine of $100.

The record presents nothing for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is af-. firmed.
| 1. | I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Shire plc; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this amendment no. 1 to the quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Graham Hetherington Graham HetheringtonChief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
From: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US

To: Mike Kaplan <Mik e.Kaplan@usa.dupont.com>

Date: 10/20/2011 04:10 PM

Subject: Re: Data Adequacy Review for CASRN 89

- 32

- 7

Mike, I do have the final report from the contractor. They have used the proprietary protocol to review the

data that was submitted and have determined that much of it was acceptable for the purpose of meeting

the endpoints required by the test rule. The data adequacy review was labeled as CBI and I have

encountered a few administrative snags regarding this clas sification that I am trying to work out. I may

have to wait until next week to get that cleared up so I can mail you the document. However, I have

extracted some information that should be of most interest to you regarding the endpoints required by the

tes t rule on CASRN 89

- 32

- 7 .

Aquatic Effects:

Aquatic toxicity to Fish no additional testing required

Acute toxicity to Daphnia no additional testing required

Toxicity to Aquatic plants no additional testing required

Health Effects:

Acute Toxicity

Bacterial R everse Mutation no additional testing required

Repeated

- Dose Toxicity no additional testing required

**Reproductive Toxicity As noted by the sponsor "reproductive toxicity cannot be robustly addressed

through read

- across (to analog chemicals)" 

### Therefore th e reproductive toxicity endpooint remains as a

data gap

Developmental Toxicity no additional testing required

I will get back with you next week after I have resolved the CBI issues.

Regards. Paul Campanella

Paul J. Campanella, Ph.D.

Chemical Information an d Testing Branch

Chemical Control Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Washington, D.C.

202

- 564

- 8091

From: Mike Kaplan <Mike.Kaplan@usa.dupont.com>

To: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 10/20/2011 09:20 AM

Subject: Re: Fw: Follow

- up to Introduction Letter

- PMDA and Contact Information

Dear Paul,

I work from home and unfortunately do not have a fax set

- up yet. If you

cannot send by email, would you mail the contractor's report to me at the

following address:

A. Michael Kaplan

23 Wilkinson Drive

Landenberg, PA 19350

In addition, I assume that the appropriate folks at EPA are currently

reviewing the contractor's report to determine if they are in agreement

. Will that review by EPA still be completed by the end of this week as you

indicated in your previous email ? Also, will you contact me once EPA

finishes its review and let me know the final Agency's decision(s) ?

Sincerely,

Mike
**Exhibit
      23.1**





Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The
      Board
      of Directors


GSV,
      Inc.:




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos. 333-75159 and 333-91575) of GSV, inc. of our report dated March 28,
      2008, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of GSV, Inc. as of December
      31,
      2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
      stockholders' equity and
      cash
      flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2007,
      which report appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-KSB
      of
      GSV, Inc.





/s/ UHY LLP
New
      Haven, Connecticut


March
      28,
      2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM S.D. WARREN
COMPANY'S (THE "COMPANY") CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 FOUND ON PAGE 5 AND 6,
RESPECTIVELY, OF THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          22,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,300
<INVENTORY>                                    205,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               378,700
<PP&E>                                       1,341,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 371,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,499,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          281,400
<BONDS>                                        578,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     321,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,499,200
<SALES>                                      1,023,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,023,600
<CGS>                                          816,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  965,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 99,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                    41,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             57,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,500)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,300
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40


</TABLE>