alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3071 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to provide that 

no Government contribution may be made toward the cost of Exchange 

coverage for any Member of Congress or congressional staff. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2013 

Mr. GINGREY of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

to provide that no Government contribution may be made 

toward the cost of Exchange coverage for any Member 

of Congress or congressional staff. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Special Treatment 

5 for Congress Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3071 IH

1 SEC. 2. GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTION NOT PERMITTED. 

2 Section 1312(d)(3)(D) of the Patient Protection and 

3 Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18032(d)(3)(D)) is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); 

6 and 

7 (2) by inserting after clause (i) the following: 

8 ‘‘(ii) GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTION

9 NOT PERMITTED.—Notwithstanding any 

10 provision of chapter 89 of title 5, United 

11 States Code, or of any other law, no Gov12 ernment contribution under such chapter 

13 may be made for health benefits obtained 

14 by any Member of Congress or congres15 sional staff in accordance with clause (i).’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## 541

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  **aROVcR**

SKLLRS **AhORNFT**

**Gcnm ”** **rL** Roaorable t. J. 

### Tuoker County Attommy sulphur apringo, To%40 Opinion 

### No. C-78)9 ilor The the g

### ouu 8nd 4utborlt7 

### of it7 c8niorioa or

You hate 

### Nqumted th 48 tollw8l“The 

### city CmEdrrl



### no protort 

### orpetition thr 8ppliaation **for** 8 **fr8.b**

Attachad herato la of tho above referred a copy satlon.n to **or&ance,** for your inforThe 

### Cityof Stalphur Spring* 18 operating under a ahartrr granted in 1911 by **the** Legislrturo of Texas (Chapter k?, page 375, Acts of the 32nd Luglslature). *me are informed t!lzt In 1937 the qualified voter0 of SUphur Springs, 8t aNOB. T, J. tioker - **Pye** 2

r8ylvl7 

## railed

l lrotion, **dlupproved** 

### the adoption 

### of the R-e 2ulo Aundmut.



### Cenualaw8

(;ovuniy

088h l le8bionr l8 8au 

## l lt7.m **?h@ above**  **quo%ed 8h4rtU**  **pmri8i048** ue 8pOO1fi8 upon the proaedure to k followed in th8 granting of l fran**Chi80** by the **City Of**  E+ulphur **bprlagr** for **the** purpo8a of ' operating l 

### l

y8te& of burr8 within the eitye Ar 

## l uoh, the ;vovirionr of Subsrotlon **(qq)** naoes441%y pnrdl over other ccnerd provision8 ln tho charter, PartiCUlPrly **Sootton** 3 of Article X1X upon tha gen+:ral cubjeot of franrhire granting ordinunc6r. You we advim? that it 1s the opinion of thin LkpsrCi:.ent t&t the aaycr &?d iitp Conaisslm of -ulphur .+rin;:s, Terns, has the pouer and authority to arpkc a &rant /of a I‘ranahise for the purpoer of opcreting a o ~~tsai of bums in the City of Sulphur Spriwa without **80 L**  **ireion af**  the quc&l.on to a vote of tbt qualified rotera of the Clt unless within thirty days after the pe8tux.qOf tbc branch I’ M

## 543

Non. T. J. Tuokor - Pap f **gmntl** ordiauwo, l petitlon ri&md by the lr uirite oumbu of q-1 ffrd 

### tofua aa rpeoiflwd ln Subrrrtlon **“ I**  

### 9 qq) rhrll **be ptraonted**  **to** the **coadraloaur** nqurrtlns **that** uid ordinmae b8 euba4tted **to vote**  of the people. Your, ruy wuly ATTORXXY OAkXRAt O? TEXAS
Exhibit 10.2


Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Rua Paraiba, 1.122 - 20(0) andar
30.130-141 - Belo Horizonte - MG
Brasil
                                                                  Deloitte
Telefone: (31) 3269 - 7400                                        Touche
Facsimile: (31) 3269 - 7470                                       Tohmatsu
www.deloitte.com.br




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the use, in this Annual Report of Total Fleet S.A. on Form 20-F
filed on June 30, 2003 (File No. 333-8128-02), which is incorporated by
reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 filed on August 24, 2001
(Registration No. 333-13852-02), of our report dated March 14, 2003.



Belo Horizonte, Brazil

    June 30, 2003

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report, includedherein, dated January 17, 2003, except for Notes 12 and 27 as to which the dateis April 14, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements of MidwestBanc Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and forthe years then ended in the two Registration Statements on Form S-8 for the“Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan” filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on July 7, 1998, May 19, 2000, and July 26, 2002 and“Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. Employees’ Retirement Plan” filed by the Companywith the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 10, 1998.
 Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Oak Brook, Illinois
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.2

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 pertaining to the eToys Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
the eToys Inc. 1999 Directors Stock Option Plan, the eToys Inc. 1999 Stock
Option Plan, the eToys Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan and the BabyCenter, Inc.
1997 Stock Option Plan in the related Prospectuses of our report dated  April
30, 1999, with respect to the financial statements of BabyCenter, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2000.





                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Los Angeles, California
June 1, 2000
----

|  | (1) | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.; |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements                    made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                     |                STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC. |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|--------|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Dated: November 20, 2019 |                                           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |
|   |                     |  By:                                      |  /s/ Dolev Rafaeli                                                   |   |
|   |                     |                                           |        Dolev Rafaeli                                                                                                                                                                                                            |   |
|   |                     |                                           |        President & Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                  |   |

----
EX-10.25



 







Exhibit 10.25




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

CENDANT CORPORATION 1999 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN,

AS AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF JANUARY 22, 2005




          Cendant Corporation (the “Corporation”) hereby adopts this First Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the
Cendant Corporation 1999 Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated
as of January 22, 2005 (the “Director Deferred Compensation Plan”). Capitalized terms not defined
in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Director Deferred Compensation Plan. This
Amendment is effective as of November 18, 2005. Except as amended hereunder, all other terms and
conditions of the Director Deferred Compensation Plan shall remain in full force and effect.



1. The proviso in Section 5 of the Director Deferred Compensation Plan is hereby deleted
in its entirety and replaced with the following new proviso:





provided,however, that a Director may (a) no later than sixty (60) days prior
to the beginning of any calendar year, revoke an election to the extent
applicable to such calendar year and (b) pursuant to the transition relief
provided under Q&A 19(c) of IRS Notice 2005-1, make a new election to change
the deferral period applicable to previously deferred amounts, provided that
such election is made on or before December 31, 2005.


2. Section 9 of the Director Deferred Compensation Plan is hereby by amended by adding
the following proviso at the end of the first sentence thereof, to read as follows:





provided,however, that, (a) if elected by a Director with respect to amounts
deferred prior to calendar year 2006, as contemplated by Section 5, and (b)
with respect to all amounts deferred for calendar year 2006 and thereafter, a
Director’s account will be distributed to him or her seven months following the
date on which the Director ceases to serve on the Board of Directors of Cendant
or, if the Director continues to serve on the Board of Directors of one of the
entities resulting from the proposed transaction pursuant to which Cendant will
separate into four independent publicly-traded companies (the separated entity
with whom the Director may continue to serve on the Board of Directors being
referred to as “Newco”), seven months following the date on which the Director
ceases to serve on the Board of Directors of Newco.



          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and as evidence of the adoption of this First Amendment, the Corporation has
caused the same to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 9th day of December,
2005.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST:

	 	 	 	 	 	CENDANT CORPORATION	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	By	 	/s/  Terry Conley	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	Terry Conley, Executive Vice President
#### Arnulfo AGUIRRE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27090.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 20, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, .State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of assault with intent to murder. Punishment was assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record on appeal does not reflect that appellant has been sentenced in the trial court. Where no *sentence has been*pronounced in the trial court, this court is without jurisdiction to enter any order except to dismiss the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Timothy J. Casey, President andChief Executive Officer of K-Sea General Partner GP LLC, as general partner ofK-Sea General Partner L.P., the general partner of K-Sea TransportationPartners L.P. (the “Partnership”), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,that:

(1)         The Partnership’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|                                | /s/ TIMOTHY J.  CASEY |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------|
| Dated: September 13, 2005 | Name:                 | Timothy J. Casey |
|                           | Title:                | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
#### GREEN v. STATE.

No. 22268.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 4, 1942.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 13, 1943.

Mel Janes, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Aus-’ tin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in Scurry County, a dry area. Upon a plea of guilty before the court appellant’s punishment was assessed at a fine of $200. The record is before this court without bills of exception or statement of facts, in *187which condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

The record in this cause is the same as in No. 22263, 167 S.W.2d 183, against the same appellant, save that in the present record the precise date of the judgment on appellant’s plea of guilty is not shown. The case was tried at the March term, 1942, of the county court, and the delays in perfecting the record are the same as in No. 22263.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
**Exhibit
      32**








**Written
      Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. §1350**








Solely
      for the
      purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer
      and Chief Financial Officer of Teltronics, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify,
      based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
      for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/
      Ewen R.
      Cameron


Ewen
      R.
      Cameron


Chief
      Executive
      Officer








/s/
      Russell R.
      Lee III


Russell
      R. Lee
      III


Chief
      Financial
      Officer








Date:   May
      14, 2007
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 60448 Summary Calendar

HUGO ALBERTO PEREZ, also known as Hugo Albert Moreno ,
Petitioner

v. LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A201 064 108

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Hugo Alberto Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of th e Board of Immigration Appeals ’ dismissal of his appeal of the immigration j udge’s denial of his application for withholding of removal. Perez argues that the agency erred in denying his application for withholding of removal. He asserts that he established past persecution and a well

- founded fear of future persecution based upon his membership in a particular soc ial group, namely,

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 11, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-60448 Document: 00513075418 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/11/2015N o. 14

- 60448

2 people who have been threatened and harmed by gangs based on their refusal to join the gang. He further contends that Mexican authorities are unwilling or unable to protect him. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Pere z’s applicatio n for withholding of removal. We have previously rejected a similar argument that young men who were recruited by criminal gangs constitute a particular social group because the proposed group lacked the necessary social visibility
and did n o t meet the particularity test. See Orellana

- Monson v. Holder , 685 F.3d 511, 518 (5th Cir. 2012). Perez has not shown that his claim is distinguishable from that alleged in Orellana

- Monson . Therefore, he has not shown that the evidence compels a conclusion that it is more likely than not that he will be persecuted on account of his membership in this particular social group if he is removed to Mexico. See Orellana

- Monson , 685 F.3d at 518; Zhang v. Gonzales , 43 2 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005)

. The petition for review is DENIED. Case: 14-60448 Document: 00513075418 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/11/2015
#### RICE v. STATE.

No. 24583.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 11, 1950.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 22, 1950.

None on appeal for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by the jury of driving an automobile while intoxicated and was fined $300 and sentenced to 30 days in jail.

There is but one bill of exceptions in the record and that relates to certain alleged argument of the County Attorney wherein it is alleged that such attorney stated to the jury that appellant had testified that “He drank on the road from Galveston.” This bill is qualified by the trial court to show that no such objection was made thereto when the statement was made, but that during such attorney’s address to the jury a written objection thereto was handed to the trial judge. The qualification further states that such statement was a logical conclusion from the testimony found in the record, and it seems to be such to us. We see no error shown in this bill, it being the only one in the record, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing

WOODLEY, Judge.

Upon again examining the record, we remain convinced that the argument complained of was a logical conclusion of the county attorney from the testimony found in the record, as certified by the trial judge in his qualification of appellant’s lone bill of exception.

Upon this holding, the judgment was affirmed and the motion for rehearing is overruled.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#### WHITAKER v. STATE.

No. 25106.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 17, 1951.

No attorney on appeal.

George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted for a violation of the liquor law in Floyd County. His penalty was assessed at a fine of $300 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 60 days.

The proceedings appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which no question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY

As of December 31, 2008, ServiceMaster had the following subsidiaries:

Subsidiary

State or Country
of Incorporation
or Organization667217 Ontario Limited

CanadaAmerican Home Shield Corporation

DelawareAmerican Home Shield of Arizona, Inc.

ArizonaAmerican Home Shield of California, Inc.

CaliforniaAmerican Home Shield of Florida, Inc.

FloridaAmerican Home Shield of Iowa, Inc.

IowaAmerican Home Shield of Maine, Inc.

MaineAmerican Home Shield of Nevada, Inc.

NevadaAmerican Home Shield of Texas, Inc.

TexasAmerican Home Shield of Virginia, Inc.

VirginiaAmerican Home Shield of Washington, Inc.

WashingtonAmerican Residential Services Holding L.L.C.

DelawareAmeriSpec, Inc.

DelawareCertified Systems, Inc.

TexasD. R. Church Landscape Co., Inc.

IllinoisFM Medic LLC

DelawareFurniture Medic Limited Partnership

DelawareGreenLawn, Ltd.

CanadaHome Shield Insurance Agency, Inc.

CaliforniaInStar Services Group, Inc.

DelawareMerry Maids Limited Partnership

DelawareMinnesota Lawn Maintenance, Inc.

MinnesotaMM Maids L.L.C.

DelawareNew Jersey Home Shield Corporation

New JerseyPersonal Profesional de Pesticidas, S.A. de C.V.

MexicoPetgar Holdings, Inc.

CanadaSchumacher Landscaping, Inc.

MassachusettsServiceMaster Acceptance Corporation

DelawareServiceMaster Brands L.L.C.

VermontServiceMaster Brands Management L.L.C.

DelawareServiceMaster BSC L.L.C.

DelawareServiceMaster Consumer Services, Inc.

DelawareServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership

DelawareServiceMaster Employer Services, Inc.

DelawareServiceMaster Funding Company LLC

DelawareServiceMaster Gift L.L.C.

FloridaServiceMaster Holding Corporation

DelawareServiceMaster International Holdings, Inc.

DelawareServiceMaster Limited

EnglandServiceMaster Management Corporation

DelawareServiceMaster of Canada Limited

CanadaServiceMaster Pacific Rim Expansion LLC

DelawareServiceMaster Receivables Company LLC

DelawareServiceMaster Residential/Commercial Services Limited Partnership

DelawareServicios de Plagas Terminix, S.A. de C.V.

Mexico


---



Subsidiary

State or Country
of Incorporation
or OrganizationSiteService L.L.C.

DelawareSM Clean L.L.C.

DelawareSnow Removers L.L.C.

DelawareSteward Insurance Company

VermontTerminix International, Inc.

DelawareTerminix International, S.A.

MexicoThe ServiceMaster Acceptance Company Limited Partnership

DelawareThe ServiceMaster Foundation

IllinoisThe Terminix International Company Limited Partnership

DelawareTruGreen Companies L.L.C.

DelawareTruGreen Home Landscape Services, L.L.C.

DelawareTruGreen LandCare, a California general partnership

CaliforniaTruGreen LandCare L.L.C.

DelawareTruGreen LandCare of Alabama L.L.C.

DelawareTruGreen LandCare of Nevada L.L.C.

DelawareTruGreen Limited Partnership

DelawareTruGreen, Inc.

DelawareTSI Staffing, Inc.

Texas


---



QuickLinks