alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Current DOE definitions:

The term “distributor” means a person (other than the manufacturer or retailer) to whom a consumer 

product is delivered or sold for purposes of distribution in commerce.

The term “retailer” means a person to whom a consumer product is delivered or sold, if such delivery or 

sale is for purposes of sale or distribution in commerce to purchasers who buy such product for 

purposes other than re-sale.

Proposed definitions:

A dealer or contractor is a person (other than the manufacturer or distributor) who sells to and/or 

installs for an end user a residential central air conditioner covered by regional standards.

An installer is a person that installs a residential central air conditioner covered by regional standards. A 

contractor, dealer, or installer may perform any of the functions defined above.

Vote (9/4/2014): unanimous 

Definition Ideas:

• A dealer or contractor is a person (other than the manufacturer or distributor) to whom a consumer 

product is delivered and sold to an end user.

• A dealer or contractor is a person (other than the manufacturer or distributor) who sells to an end 

user and/or installs a residential central air conditioner covered by regional standards.

• An installer is a person that installs a residential central air conditioner covered by regional 

standards.

• A contractor, dealer, or installer may perform any of the functions defined above.

Dealer Contractor Installer

• A dealer is a contractor with 

a relationship with a product 

manufacturer or distributors. 

The relationship can be 

formal with a contract or 

informal with a contract or 

informal in that they 

specialize in that product 

from a specific 

manufacturer.

• Entity that purchases the 

equipment for the purpose 

of selling to the end user

• The person that offers to 

perform services in HVAC

• A contractor is one who is 

hired to specify(?) and/or 

install a product. A 

contractor may employ 

installers or subcontract to 

an installer.

• Entity that the customer 

employs

• Entity that purchases the 

equipment for the purpose 

of selling and or installing for 

the consumer

• The entity that oversees the 

installation

• The entity that installs the 

equipment
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 63580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27265]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-550-001]


Stingray Pipeline Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 18, 2000.
    Take notice that on October 13, 2000, Stingray Pipeline Company, 
L.L.C. (Stingray), tendered for filing FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised 
Volume No. 1, Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 157. Stingray 
proposes that this sheet be made effective on October 1, 2000.
    Stingray states that this filing is made in compliance with the 
Commission's October 5 Letter Order issued in Docket No. RP00-550-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commissions' Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27265 Filed 10-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 312 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 312

  To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of 
    individuals from service on a Federal jury on account of sexual 
                    orientation or gender identity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2013

  Mrs. Davis of California (for herself, Mr. Blumenauer, Ms. Chu, Mr. 
 Grijalva, Mr. Himes, Mr. Honda, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. McGovern, 
  Ms. Meng, Ms. Moore, Mr. Moran, Ms. Norton, Ms. Loretta Sanchez of 
    California, Ms. Schakowsky, and Mr. Van Hollen) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of 
    individuals from service on a Federal jury on account of sexual 
                    orientation or gender identity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Juror Non-Discrimination Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM FEDERAL JURIES ON ACCOUNT OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION 
              OR GENDER IDENTITY PROHIBITED.

    Section 1862 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``sexual orientation, gender identity,'' after ``sex''.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered July 31, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00122-CV

ADDISON URBAN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC, Appellant

V.

ALAN RITCHEY MATERIALS COMPANY, LC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-10-03902-C

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s July 15, 2013 unopposed motion for leave to file a sur-reply 

brief. We ORDER the sur-reply brief attached to appellee’s motion filed as of the date of this 

order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Tandycrafts,
Inc's December 31, 1997 Form 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such Form 10Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             491
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,808
<INVENTORY>                                     53,537
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,392
<PP&E>                                          51,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,154
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,528
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,395
<SALES>                                        128,596
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,596
<CGS>                                           84,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  120,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,773
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,161
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,156
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,005
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,005
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
        

</TABLE>
NO. SCPW-12-0000122
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
LANDISH K. ARMITAGE and ROBIN R. ARMITAGE,

Petitioners,

vs. THE HONORABLE BARBARA T. TAKASE, JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI # I; and WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIVIL NO. 3RC-11-1-1142)

ORDER (By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ. and Circuit Judge Ayabe, in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused)

Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration of the March 7, 2012 order denying the petition for a writ of mandamus, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, March 21, 2012. /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Bert I. Ayabe Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000122 21-MAR-2012 08:27 AM
#### Joe Dean CLOUGH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27187.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 24, 1954.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The conviction is for the felony offense of driving while intoxicated as defined in Article 802b, V.A.P.C.; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

Notice of appeal was given on April 13, 1954, and the statement of facts was filed in the trial court on July 16, which was 94 days thereafter. A statement of facts filed too late cannot be considered. Teague v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 253 S.W.2d 276; Hall v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 263 S.W.2d 563, and Lister v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 266 S.W.2d 138.

There are no bills of exception in the record.

The judgment fixed appellant’s punishment at not less than ten days nor more than two years. The same is now reformed to assess his punishment at a definite term of two years.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas L. Carter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Thomas L. Carter

Thomas L. Carter
Chief Financial Officer

April 15, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc. and will be retained by
Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 210 (Monday, October 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27769]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 11480-001 Alaska]


Haida Corporation Project; Notice of Availability Of Final 
Environmental Assessment

October 24, 2000.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for an original license 
for Haida Corporation's proposed Reynolds Creek Hydroelectric Project, 
and has prepared a Final Environmental Assessment (FEA). The project 
would be located about 10 miles east of Hydaburg, Alaska on Prince of 
Wales Island.
    On September 9, 1999, the Commission staff issued a draft 
environmental assessment (DEA) for the project and requested that 
comments be filed with the Commission within 45 days. Comments on the 
DEA were filed by the Alaska Power & Telephone Company, National Marine 
Fisheries Service, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Alaska Division 
of Governmental Coordination, Haida Corporation, and Natural Heritage 
Institute and are addressed in the FEA.
    The FEA contains the staff's analysis of the potential 
environmental impacts of the project and concludes that licensing the 
project, with appropriate environmental protective measures, would not 
constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the 
quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the FEA are available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room, Room 2A, at 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, 
D.C. 20426, and on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm 
[please call (202 208-222 for assistance].

David P. Boergers
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-27769 Filed 10-27-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. PL98-1-001]

Take notice that the Commission Staff (Staff) will conduct demonstrations for filing comments electronically (excluding comments on rulemakings).

The electronic filing demonstrations will be held following the Commission meetings on October 25, 2000 and November 8, 2000.

The demonstration on October 25, 2000 will be held in Hearing Room 1 and the demonstration on November 8 will be held in the Commission Meeting Room at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

The electronic filing demonstrations are open to all interested persons.

                    The Capitol Connection will offer the electronic filing demonstration on November 8, 2000, as a special FERC meeting,                     *live*                     over the Internet as well as via telephone and satellite. For a reasonable fee, you can receive the demonstration in your office, at home or anywhere in the world. To find out more about The Capitol Connection's live Internet, phone bridge or satellite coverage, contact David Reininger or Julia Morelli at (703) 993-3100 or visit Capital Connection's website at                     *www.capitolconnection.gmu.edu*). The Capitol Connection also offers FERC Open Meetings through its Washington, DC area television service.                

David Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-27620  Filed 10-26-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEVIN EUGENE NAGLE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 391 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEVIN EUGENE NAGLE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 392 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3208 

To clarify that certain natural gas facilities are not subject to the Natural 

Gas Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2013 

Mr. MCKINLEY (for himself, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, and Mr. 

RYAN of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To clarify that certain natural gas facilities are not subject 

to the Natural Gas Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NATURAL GAS ACT JURISDICTION. 

4 Section 1 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717) 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub6 section: 

7 ‘‘(e) A person not otherwise subject to this Act shall 

8 not become subject to this Act solely by reason of such 

9 person’s construction or operation of a facility not other10 wise subject to this Act that liquefies, stores, processes, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 3208 IH

1 or delivers natural gas for vehicular natural gas or other 

2 end use purposes notwithstanding that natural gas may 

3 be reinjected from the facility into an interstate pipeline, 

4 provided that such reinjections are incidental to the facili5 ty’s provision of natural gas for vehicular or other end 

6 use purposes and are required by the operational, mainte7 nance, or safety needs of the facility.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Directors' Compensation Summary



 EXHIBIT 10.25 
 Compensation Summary Sheet 
 for the Board of Directors of 
 AK Steel Holding Corporation 
 Each
Director who is not an employee of the Company currently receives an annual fee of $80,000 for service on the Board of Directors. One-half of that amount is paid in the form of restricted shares of Common Stock of the Company valued at market price
on the date of issuance and the balance is paid in cash or, at the Director’s option, in the form of additional restricted shares of Common Stock. Each non-employee Director who chairs a committee of the Board of Directors receives an
additional annual fee of $5,000 for such service. Non-employee Directors also are paid a fee of $2,000 for each Board meeting and each committee meeting they attend and are reimbursed for their expenses incurred in attending those meetings. Upon
first being elected to the Board, each non-employee Director also is granted options under the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan to purchase a total of 10,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at its then prevailing market price. The
options vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant and may be exercised at any time thereafter until the tenth anniversary of the grant date or three years after retirement from the Board, whichever is sooner. An employee of the Company who
serves as a Director receives no additional compensation for such service. 
 Effective January 1, 2006, Mr. Robert L. Jenkins
was named Lead Independent Director of the Board of Directors. As Lead Independent Director, Mr. Jenkins’ receives an additional annual fee for service on the Board of Directors in the amount of $60,000.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0152

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM079AD

7X-006 --- 12/18/09

7X-092 --- 7/17/09

AMM 20-90-00-200-801 --- 7/7/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ AARON WEST, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________
2023

- 1850

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:22

- cv

- 01740

- LAS

, Senior Judge Loren A. Smith.

______________________ O R D E R

The appellant having failed to file the required Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance form

, and having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the Februa ry 1, 2024 order

, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in Case: 23-1850 Document: 22 Page: 1 Filed: 04/11/2024W EST V

. US 2

accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

April 11, 2024 Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: April 11, 2024 Case: 23-1850 Document: 22 Page: 2 Filed: 04/11/2024