alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 26, 2022

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________
No. 3D21

- 0874 Lower Tribunal No. F05

- 5530D

________________



### Jesus Enrique Perez
, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida
, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, William Altfield , Judge.

Jesus Enrique Perez , in proper person

. Ashley Moody , Attorney General, and Linda Katz , Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, LINDSEY, and GORDO , JJ.

PER CURIAM.2 Defendant Jesus Enrique Perez appeals the trial court’s o rder denying

his motion to correct an illegal sentence

. Finding no reversible error, we

affirm. See Carter v. State , 786 So. 2d 1173, 1181 (Fla. 2001) ( “[ A ] sentence

is ‘illegal’ if it ‘ imposes a k ind of punishment that no judge under the entire

body of sentencing statutes could possibly inflict under any set of factual

circumstances [.] ’” (citation omitted))

.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1867

KAROLINA SORENSSON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DITECH FINANCIAL LLC/ GREENTREE,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 18-1871

KAROLINA SORENSSON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, formerly d/b/a Green Tree Servicing, LLC,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, 

at Greenville. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (4:17-cv-00067-D; 4:18-cv-00042-D)

Submitted: December 18, 2018 Decided: December 20, 2018
2

Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Karolina Sorensson, Appellant Pro Se. Marc James Ayers, Birmingham, Alabama,

Jonathan Edward Schulz, BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP, Charlotte, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Karolina Sorensson appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her civil 

complaints challenging foreclosure proceedings under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Sorensson v. Ditech Fin. LLC, Nos. 4:17-cv-00067-D; 

4:18-cv-00042-D (E.D.N.C., July 17, 2018). We deny Sorensson’s motion for a 

restraining order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### RIO GRANDE VALLEY GAS CO. v. CITY OF McALLEN et al.

No. 11063.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Dec. 10, 1941.

*123Ward & Brown and B. D. Kimbrough, all of Corpus Christi, and Vinson, Elkins, Weems & Francis, of Houston, for appellant.

Cecil R. Fulton and E. A. McDaniel, both of McAllen, for appellees.

MURRAY, Justice.

Appellant, Rio Grande Valley Gas Company, instituted this suit in the District Court of Hidalgo County against the City of McAllen, its Mayor and Commissioners, and others, seeking to enjoin the attempted sale of gas revenue bonds and performance of a contract for construction of a municipal gas system within the City of McAllen.

The trial court sustained a general demurrer to appellant’s second amended original petition and dismissed the cause. From this judgment of dismissal, Rio Grande Valley Gas Company has prosecuted this appeal.

Appellant* first contends that the governing body of the City of McAllen is without authority to purchase or construct and maintain a municipal gas system or to issue revenue bonds for such purposes. We overrule this contention. Such authority is given to the *governing*body of the City of McAllen, it being a home rule city, by Article 1111, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats.; City of Dayton v. Allred, 123 Tex. 60, 68 S.W.2d 172.

Appellant next contends that the City of McAllen did not give such notice of its intention to issue revenue bonds as is required by statutes. We overrule this contention. The notice given meets all the requirements of the statutes. Section 3, of Article 2368a, Vernon’s Ann. Civ. Stats.

Appellant next contends that, in any event, the petition was sufficient to state a cause of action for injunction against the Mayor and Commissioners with reference to their conduct in trying to induce its customers to breach their contracts with appellant. We overrule this contention. This suit was primarily a suit to enjoin the issuance and sale of the revenue bonds and only a small portion of the lengthy petition was devoted to this phase of the injunction sought. In reference to this matter, the petition did not state facts as distinguished from conclusions to have justified the issuance of an injunction, as contended for in this point. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. de Garcia, Tex.Civ.App., 126 S.W.2d 1006.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Dan SAYLOR’S ADMINISTRATOR (E. M. Saylor), Appellant, v. Ida Howard BLANTON, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 8, 1954.

Gus B. Bruner, Harlan, for appellant."

James C. Brock, Harlan, for appellee.-

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Harlan Circuit Court adjudging that appellee is the owner of the land in controversy and quieting title thereto.

An examination of the record discloses that the findings of the Chancellor are amply supported by the evidence.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
# Viy-.-6Am--f

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22
- 0563 IN RE THE PARENTING PLAN OF: S.N., ROBERT NEWHOUSE,

Petitioner and Appellee, v. MARION KEEZER, k/n/a MARION SCOTT Respondent and Appellant. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Anna M.**  **Williams,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this Oct ober 19, 2022.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court
c: Jami L. Rebsom, Karl Knuchel, Anna M. Williams 10/19/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0563
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3231 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3231

 Making automatic continuing appropriations for law enforcement, crime 
 prevention, and victim services programs of the Department of Justice 
                 in the event of a Government shutdown.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2013

 Mr. Poe of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 Making automatic continuing appropriations for law enforcement, crime 
 prevention, and victim services programs of the Department of Justice 
                 in the event of a Government shutdown.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Continuing Protection for Victims 
and Law Enforcement Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTOMATIC CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT, CRIME 
              PREVENTION, AND VICTIM SERVICES PROGRAMS.

    There are hereby appropriated for fiscal year 2014, for any period 
during which a joint resolution or other Act making appropriations for 
commerce, justice, science, and related agencies is not in effect, such 
sums as may be necessary for continuing law enforcement, crime 
prevention, and victim services programs for which funds were made 
available in title II of the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2013 (division B of Public Law 113-6), at 
a rate for operations as provided for such purposes by such Act (as 
reduced by the Presidential sequestration order dated March 1, 2013).

SEC. 3. TREATMENT OF EXPENDITURES AT END OF AUTOMATIC CR PERIOD.

    Expenditures made available pursuant to this Act shall be charged 
to the applicable appropriation whenever a regular or continuing 
appropriations Act described in section 2 is enacted into law.

SEC. 4. AVAILABILITY OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Unless otherwise provided for in this Act or in the applicable 
appropriations Act for fiscal year 2014, appropriations and funds made 
available and authority granted pursuant to this Act shall be available 
until whichever of the following first occurs:
            (1) The enactment into law of an appropriation for any 
        project or activity provided for in this Act.
            (2) The enactment into law of the applicable appropriations 
        Act for fiscal year 2014 without any provision for such project 
        or activity.
            (3) December 15, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 3.3

CERTIFICATE OF MERGER    MERGING    BIOSEARCH ITALIA S.P.A.    WITH AND INTO    VERSICOR INC.

_______________________________________
Pursuant to Section 254 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
_______________________________________

First:That the name and jurisdiction of incorporation of each of the constituent corporation and the constituent Italian
joint stock company is as follows:

|NAME                                  |  | JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
|------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Versicor Inc. ("Versicor")            |  | Delaware                     
|Biosearch Italia S.p.A. ("Biosearch") |  | Italy                        

Second:That an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of July 30, 2002 (as amended, the "Merger Agreement"), by and
among Versicor and Biosearch, setting forth the terms and conditions of the merger of Biosearch with and into Versicor (the "Merger"), has been approved, adopted, certified, executed and acknowledged
by each of the constituent corporation and the constituent Italian joint stock company in accordance with the requirements of Section 254 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

Third:That the name of the surviving corporation (the "Surviving Corporation") is "Versicor Inc.".

Fourth:That pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Versicor as in
effect immediately prior to the Merger and as supplemented by Versicor's Amended and Restated Certificate of Designations relating to its Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock shall be
the Fourth Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation until thereafter amended in accordance with its terms and the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

Fifth:That an executed copy of the Merger Agreement is on file at the principal place of business of the Surviving
Corporation, at the following address: 455 South Gulph Road, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406.

Sixth:That a copy of the Merger Agreement will be furnished by the Surviving Corporation, on request and without cost, to
any stockholder of either the constituent corporation or the constituent Italian joint stock company.

Seventh:That in accordance with Section 103(d) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware the merger
shall become effective at 6:01 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time) on February 28, 2003.

[Signature
Page Follows]

---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned corporation has caused this Certificate of Merger to be executed in its corporate name this 27th day
of February, 2003.

| |  | VERSICOR INC.,
a Delaware corporation
| |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                  

2

---

QuickLinks
#### DIXON v. STATE.

No. 23780.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 15, 1947.

No appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession and sale of a narcotic drug, to-wit, morphine. The penalty assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The State’s Attorney has filed a motion requesting that the appeal be abated by reason of the death of appellant which occurred after the appeal had been filed in this court. Attached to the motion and made a part thereof is the affidavit of the Hon. R, L. Whitehead, Criminal District Attorney of Gregg County, and also a certified copy of the death certificate from the City Registrar of Vital Statistics at Long-view, Texas, both of which verify the facts stated in the motion.

The death of the appellant deprives this court of jurisdiction of the appeal, and it is therefore abated.
Exhibit
10.1


 


TAPESTRY
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 



Schedule Required by Instruction 2 to Item 601

of Regulation S-K 


 


	
  Name of Executive Officer

  Signing Amendment to

  Employment Agreement

  
	
   

  
	
  Leonard Shaykin

  
	
  Gordon Link

  
	
  Kai Larson

  



 


Amendment to Employment Agreement


 


February 27, 2006


 


This Amendment is made to that Employment Agreement dated October 1,
2001 by and between Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Tapestry) and                       
(Executive).


 


Whereas, Executive and Tapestry are desirous to conform the terms of
the Employment Agreement to changes made in the law relating to taxation of
severance payments.


 


Now, therefore, Executive and Tapestry hereby agree as follows:


 


In the event that the Company determines that any severance benefit
provided under the Employment Agreement fails to satisfy the distribution
requirement of Section 409A(a)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the “Code”), as a result of Executive’s status as a “specified
employee” within the meaning of Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code, then
the payment of such benefits shall be automatically delayed to the minimum
extent necessary so that such benefits are not subject to the provisions of
Section 409A(a)(1) of the Code.


 


All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain
unchanged.


 


Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


 


	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  [Name of Executive]
July

29, 2015 ID: FAA - 2015 - 2407 - 0001 United States Department of Transportation Docket Management Sy stem 1200 New Jersey Ave ., SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12 - 140 Washington, DC 20590 **Re: Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of 2012**  Dear Sir or Madam: As a supplementation to our original 333 Exemption Application , dated June 19, 2015 , we wish to provide to yo u the following additional information . The specific reasons we seek relief is to operate in the followin g areas of commerce : 1. Closed Set Filming Our MPTOM is outlined in the document s we have as a current attachment . Please refer to the attachment document labeled : PDC_Sup.PDF : 2 . Geo graphical Mapping 3 . Agricultural Mapping and Anal ys is 4. Real Estate Photography and Video 5. General Aerial Photograph y and Video In addition, we are providing to you all of the Relea se forms we currentl y use in our film and photography operations. We h ope this information helps sure up any concerns the FAA has toward our approval process. If more information is needed, we are alway s available to provide to your office any and all requested documentation . Thank you for you time and consideration. Sincerel y, Brandon Horgeshimer Pneumatic Drone Cinema Inc 3099 Anquilla ave. Clermont FL34711
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 003 80

- CR

TRACI SHEPPARD SCHROEDER

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 3 of Dallas County of Dallas County , Texas

Trial Cause No. F12

- 34983

- J

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEAL S, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by this Court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART AND AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED IN PART

. We further order this decision certified below f or observance. April 9, 2015
EXHIBIT 99.1 

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 

----

March 9, 2010 

MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC.     NorthTower, 7th Floor     4 World Financial Center     New York, New York 10080 

PREFERREDPLUS, PPLUSTRUST AND INDEXPLUS CERTIFICATE 

The undersigned, Maryann Joseph,Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon  (formerly The Bank of New York), a New York corporation  (the “Trustee”), herebycertifies in such capacity that, based on her knowledge, the Trustee has complied, in allmaterial respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under theStandard Terms for Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill LynchDepositor, Inc. as depositor (the “Depositor”) and the Trustee, as successor to UnitedStates Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities intermediary (the “SecuritiesIntermediary”), in each case as amended by a series supplement between the Depositor, theTrustee and the Securities Intermediary for each trust series listed in the attachedschedule.
|   |                                                                                                          |              |           |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|----------------|--------|
|   | Very truly yours,The Bank of New York Mellon (formerlyThe Bank of New York), as Trustee                  |              |
|   | By:                                                                                                 | /s/Maryann Joseph |           |
|   |                                                                                                          | Name:             | Maryann Joseph |   |
|   |                                                                                                          | Title:            | Vice President |   |
|   |  |   |
|--------|--|--------|

----

SCHEDULE 

INDEXPLUS Trust Series 2003-1     PPLUSTrust Series CMT-1     PPLUS Trust Series CSF-1    PPLUS Trust SeriesDCNA-1     PPLUS Trust Series FMC-1     PPLUS Trust Series GSC-1     PPLUS Trust Series GSC-2     PPLUS Trust Series GSG-1     PPLUS Trust Series GSG-2    PPLUS Trust SeriesJPM-1     PPLUS Trust Series LMG-3     PPLUS Trust Series SPR-1     PPLUSTrust Series TWC-1     PPLUS Trust Series VAL-1     PreferredPLUS Trust Series ALL-1    PreferredPLUS Trust Series CCR-1     PreferredPLUS Trust Series CTR-1PreferredPLUS Trust Series CZN-1     PreferredPLUS Trust Series ELP-1     PreferredPLUS TrustSeries FAR-1     PreferredPLUS Trust Series FRD-1     PreferredPLUS Trust Series GEC-1        PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-1     PreferredPLUS TrustSeries LMG-2 PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-1     PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-2     PreferredPLUS TrustSeries UPC-1     PreferredPLUS Trust Series VER-1 
|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3262 

Eliminating the debt ceiling for a period defined, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 5, 2013 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

Eliminating the debt ceiling for a period defined, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal Sanity Act for 

5 the National Debt’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NONAPPLICABILITY OF DEBT CEILING. 

7 Section 3101(b) of title 31, United States Code, shall 

8 not apply for the period beginning on the date of the en9 actment of this Act and ending 120 days thereafter. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of MDSI Mobile Data Solutions Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Erik
Dysthe,  the  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  Chairman  of the Board and
Director of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                           /s/  Erik Dysthe
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                           Chairman of the Board and Director
                                           May 17, 2004