alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 208 (Thursday, October 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 64277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-27516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations 
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration 
(FRA) received a request for a waiver of compliance with certain 
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is 
described below, including the party seeking relief, the regulatory 
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the 
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.

Minnesota Northern Railroad

[Docket Number FRA-2000-7948]

    The Minnesota Northern Railroad (MNN) of Crookston, Minnesota, has 
petitioned for a permanent waiver of compliance for two locomotives 
from the requirements of the Safety Glazing Standards, 49 CFR part 223, 
which requires certified glazing in all locomotive windows, except 
those locomotives used in yard service. The railroad indicates that the 
locomotives are most often used in yard service at Crookston and Thief 
River Falls, Minnesota, but may occasionally be utilized in road 
service. MNN states that the railroad operates in a rural area of 
northwestern Minnesota with the largest cities being Crookston 
(population 8,100) and Thief River Falls (population 8,400).
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings 
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate 
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since 
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party 
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in 
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for 
their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the 
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-
2000-7948) and must be submitted in triplicate to the Docket Clerk, DOT 
Central Docket Management Facility, Room PL-401, Washington, DC 20590-
0001. Communications received within 45 days of the date of this notice 
will be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments 
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All 
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for 
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at DOT 
Central Docket Management Facility, Room PL-401 (Plaza Level), 400 
Seventh Street S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590. All documents in the 
public docket are also available for inspection and copying on the 
Internet at the docket facility's web site at http://dms.dot.gov.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on October 18, 2000.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 00-27516 Filed 10-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

     In connection with the quarterly report of Tecumseh Products Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
James S. Nicholson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 8, 2005                   BY: /s/ JAMES S. NICHOLSON
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            James S. Nicholson
                                            Vice President, Treasurer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
#### HOME OWNERS’ LOAN CORPORATION v. WILLIAMS et ux.

No. 11250.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Feb. 10, 1943.

Rehearing Denied March 10, 1943.

*326A. M. Frazier and J. L. Walsh, Jr., both of Dallas, for appellant.

Randle Taylor, of San Antonio, for ap-pellees.

MURRAY, Justice.

This suit was instituted by Home Owners’ Loan Corporation on a promissory note, in the District Court of Bexar County, against A! B. Williams and wife, Eloise Williams, to recover the balance of an indebtedness, admittedly owing to it by A. B. Williams, following a substitute trustee’s sale of realty, unless said debt be barred by limitation. The suit was not filed until more than four years after Home Owners’ Loan Corporation had declared its indebtedness due and payable. Williams and wife seasonably interposed a plea of limitation under Art. 5527, Vernon’s Ann. Civ. Statutes. Home Owners’ Loan Corporation claimed immunity from the bar of limitation because of its governmental character.

The trial was to the court without the intervention of a jury and the trial court sustained such plea of limitation and rendered judgment that plaintiff take nothing, from which judgment Home Owners’ Loan Corporation has prosecuted this appeal.

This appeal presents but one question, to-wit: Does the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation have the same immunity from a plea of limitation that the Federal Government has?

We conclude that it does not. The Home Owners’ Loan Corporation is a regularly chartered corporation. It has stock and capital. It has a separate and distinct legal existence from the government of the United States. It engages in business very much in the same manner as a private person or corporation. It has the power to sue and be sued in any court of competent jurisdiction, federal or state. 12 U.S.C.A. § 1461 et seq.

We have found no authorities directly in point, but the following are enlightening: Keifer & Keifer v. R. F. C., 306 U.S. 381, 59 S.Ct. 516, 83 L.Ed. 784, pages 794-810; Federal Housing Administration v. Burr, 309 U.S. 242, 60 S.Ct. 488, 84 L.Ed. 724; Home Owners’ Loan Corp. v. Cilley, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 313,

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63


OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








I, Alicia Borst Derrah, the Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and principal financial officer of Man Investments (USA) Corp., the general partner of Man-AHL Diversified I L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Annual Report of the Partnership on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.








Date:  March 31, 2011


s/ Alicia Borst Derrah


Alicia Borst Derrah


Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR THE TWELVE MONTH
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 WHICH ARE INCLUDED IN THE REGISTRANT'S  FORM 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001052262
<NAME>                        Happy Kids Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         139
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  20,640
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (513)
<INVENTORY>                                    23,579
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               47,992
<PP&E>                                         1,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,570)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 50,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,697
<BONDS>                                        3,753
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       103
<OTHER-SE>                                     32,428
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   50,452
<SALES>                                        154,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               154,559
<CGS>                                          113,796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               22,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,077
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                16,237
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,603
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            11,634
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   11,634
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.21 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.21 <F2>
<FN>
<F1>      This amount represents Basic Earnings per Share in accordance with the
          requirements of Statement of Financial  Accounting Standards No. 128 -
          "Earnings per Share".

<F2>      This amount  represents  Diluted Earnings per Share in accordance with
          the  requirements of Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards No.
          128 - "Earnings per Share".
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF CHERRY, BEKAERT & Holland, L.L.P.

The Board of Directors
Citizens South Banking Corporation
Gastonia, North Carolina


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-103218, 333-77657 and 333-111228) of Citizens South Banking
Corporation of our report dated March 3, 2006, related to the consolidated
statements of condition as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the three year period ended December 31,
2005 and of our report dated March 3, 2006 on the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 which are included in
the December 31, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Citizens South Banking
Corporation.


/s/ Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.


Gastonia, North Carolina
March 13, 2006
Yearly Certificateholders' Statement (K)
                         
                 CAPITOL REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1997-1
                         
     Under  subsection  5.3 of the Pooling and Servicing  Agreement  dated as of
     November 1, 1997 by and  between  Chevy  Chase  Bank,  F.S.B.,  a federally
     chartered  savings bank, as Transferor  and Servicer,  and US Bank National
     Assoc.,  as Trustee and Custodial Agent  (hereinafter as such agreement may
     have been, or may from time to time be, amended,  supplemented or otherwise
     modified, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement"),  Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.,
     as the  Servicer,  is required to prepare  certain  information  each month
     regarding current  distributions on the Certificates and the performance of
     the Capitol  Revolving  Home Equity Loan Trust 1997-1 (the "Trust")  during
     the  related  Collection  Period.  The  information  that is required to be
     prepared   with   respect   to   the    distribution    to   Holders   (the
     "Certificateholders")  of the  Certificates  for the  calendar  year  ended
     December  31,  1998 is set  forth  below.  Certain  of the  information  is
     presented  on the basis of an  original  principal  amount  of  $1,000  per
     Certificate,  as the case may be.  Capitalized terms used and not otherwise
     defined herein have the meanings assigned them in the Pooling and Servicing
     Agreement.
                         
A.   Information Regarding the Current Year Distribution to Certificateholders
     (Per $1,000 Original Principal Amount of a Certificate).
                         
                         
     1.   The amount, if any, of principal included in
          such distribution, separately stating the    
          components thereof (including the portion    
          thereof attributable to collections in respect of
          the Mortgage Loans)...............................     $314.82
                         
     2.   The amount of Investor Certificate Interest  included in
            such distribution, the related Investor Certificate
            Rate and the portion        
          thereof attributable to collections in  
          respect of the Mortgage Loans.....................     $50.18
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Certificate 
to be duly executed this 25th day of March, 1999  
                         
                              CHEVY CHASE BANK, F.S.B.
                              as Servicer         
                         
                         
                         
                                  By:   Carol Thomas
                                        ------------------
                                        Carol Thomas   
                                        Vice President
y



### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 12

- 00354

- CV

CMA

- CGM (AMERICA), INC. , Appellant

V.

EMPIRE TRUCK LINES, INC. , Appellee

Appeal from the 11th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2005

- 22806 ).

TO THE 11TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court , on the 23rd day of May 2013 , the cause upon appeal to revise or

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on March 14, 2012. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment

contains no rev ersible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, CMA

- CGM (America), Inc.

, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.

Judgment rendered July 9 , 2013.Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Radack.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

March 13, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2003, of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Greg G. Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                              /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Greg G. Gruber
                                              Senior Vice President, Chief
                                              Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)

                                              May 14, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and will be retained by Tennessee Gas
Pipeline Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**Memo to Docket No. EPA**
**- R09** 
**- OAR** 
**- 2012** 
**- 0021** 

**Date: November 1 4**  **, 2012 Subject: History of Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP) Submittals Under the**  **Regional Haze Rule Date**  **Event Docket**  **Index No./Citation**  July 1, 1999 EPA p romulgat es Regional Haze Rule (RHR) 64 FR 35714 A.5 December 23, 2003 Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) submits Arizona Section 309 SIP (not including 309(g)) B.16 December 31, 2004 ADEQ submits r evision to Arizona Section 309 SIP (not including

309(g)) B.17 February 18, 2005 D.C. Circuit grants petition for review in Center for Energy &

Economic Development v. EPA (“ CEED ”) 398 F.3d 653 Oct. 13, 2006 EPA promulgates revisions to section 309 in response to CEED

decision 71 FR 60612 December 17, 2007 Deadline for submission of revised 309 SIPs (or 308 SI Ps)

- December 24, 2008 ADEQ re

- submits its prior 309 submittals (without provisions to

address 309(d)(4) or 309(g)) B.19 January 15, 2009 EPA issues Finding of Failure To Submit SIPs Required by the RHR for 37 states including Arizona 76 FR 75544 A.17 January 2011 “FIP clock” expires for Regional Haze plans covered by 2009 Finding of Failure To Submit ; EPA receive s a notice of intent to sue for failure to promulgate Regional Haze FIPs or approve Regional Haze SI Ps - February 28, 2011 ADEQ submits 308 SI P B.1 August 2011 EPA is sued for failure to promulgate Regional Haze FIPs or approve

Regional Haze SIPs -
Exhibit 23.2

INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomes
effective contains an untrue statement of material fact, or omits a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring a
security pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, an
accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of the registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection with the registration statement.

The
Company dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") as its independent auditors, effective June 6, 2002. For additional information, see the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated, June 10, 2002. After reasonable efforts, the Company has been unable to obtain Andersen's written consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company's
registration statements (File Nos. 333-85300 and 333-61602) (the "Registration Statements") of Andersen's audit report with respect to the Company's consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2001 and for each of the two years then ended. Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits the Company to file this Annual Report
on Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into the Registration Statements, without a written consent from Andersen. As a result, with respect to transactions in the
Company's securities pursuant to the Registration Statements that occur subsequent to the date this Annual Report on Form 10-K is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Andersen will not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Andersen or any
omissions of a material fact required to be stated herein. Accordingly, you would be unable to assert a claim against Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities act.

---

QuickLinks
EX-10.2
                       PROMISSORY NOTE

                       PROMISSORY NOTE

Principal Amount $20,000.00                     Date: November 17, 2002

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, RMD Technologies, Inc. hereby promise to pay
to the order of Patrick A. Galliher or Suzanne E, Galliher the sum of
Twenty Thousand Dollars, together with interest thereon at the rate of
1% per month on the unpaid balance. Said sum shall be paid upon demand.

     This note shall at the option of any holder thereof be
immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of any of the
following:  1) Breach of any condition of any security interest,
mortgage, loan agreement, pledge agreement or guarantee granted as
collateral security for this note. 2) Breach of any condition of any
loan agreement, security agreement or mortgage, if any, having a
priority over any loan agreement, security agreement or mortgage on
collateral granted, in whole or in part, as collateral security for
this note. 3) Upon the death, incapacity, dissolution or liquidation
of any of the undersigned, or any endorser, guarantor to surety
hereto. 4) Upon the filing by any of the undersigned of an assignment
for the benefit of creditors, bankruptcy or other form of insolvency,
or by suffering an involuntary petition in bankruptcy or receivership
not vacated within thirty (30) days.

     In the event this note shall be in default and placed for
collection, then the undersigned agree to pay all reasonable attorney
fees and costs of collection. All payments hereunder shall be made to
such address as may from time to time be designated by any holder.

     The undersigned and all other parties to this note, whether as
endorsers, guarantors or sureties, agree to remain fully bound until
this note shall be fully paid and waive demand, presentment and
protest and all notices hereto and further agree to remain bound,
notwithstanding any extension, modification, waiver, or other
indulgence or discharge or release of any obligor hereunder or
exchange, substitution, or release of any collateral granted as
security for this note. No modification or indulgence by any holder
hereof shall be binding unless in writing; and any indulgence on any
one occasion shall not be an indulgence for any other or future
occasion. Any modification or change in terms, hereunder granted by
any holder hereof, shall be valid and binding upon each of the
undersigned, notwithstanding the acknowledgement of any of the
undersigned, and each of the undersigned does hereby irrevocably grant
to each of the others a power of attorney to enter into any such
modification on their behalf. The rights of any holder hereof shall be
cumulative and not necessarily successive. This note shall take effect
as a sealed instrument and shall be construed, governed and enforced
in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

RMD Technologies, Inc.


By: /s/  Pat Galliher
Pat Galliher, President