alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting.

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Advanced Networking and Infrastructure Research (#1207).                    

*Date/Time:*                         March 2 and 3, 2000; 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Room 1120, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Persons:*                         Darleen Fisher and Karen Sollins, Division of Advanced Networking Infrastructure Research, Room 1175, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1950.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the Networking Research Program as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: February 1, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-2744 Filed 2-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### City of Cleveland, Appellant, *v.*Public Utilities Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees. (Three cases.)

(Nos. 27917, 27918 and 27919

Decided March 20, 1940.)

*411*Mr. Henry 8. Brainard,*director of law, and *Mr. Spencer W. Reeder,*for appellant.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. Kenneth L. Sater,*for appellee, Public Utilities Commission.

*Mr. Frank M. Cobb*and *Messrs. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey,*for appellee, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company.

*Messrs. Jones, Day, Gockley & Reavis,*for appellee, The Cleveland Light & Power Company

*Messrs. Simmons, DeWitt & Vilas*and *Mr. Richard L. McNelly,*for appellee, Bradley Light, Heating & Power Company.

By the Court.

Since no action thus far taken by the .commission in the pending rate appeals constitutes a final order, the appeals in this court are dismissed.

The appeals being premature, no constitutional question is properly before this court.

*Appeals dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                              EXHIBIT 12


                                                       MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV
                                                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.
                                                         COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                                           COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS (UNAUDITED)
                                                                  (dollars in thousands)



                                   FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                    DECEMBER 26, 2008                  DECEMBER 28, 2007                  DECEMBER 29, 2006
                           ---------------------------------  ---------------------------------  ----------------------------------
                              MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                                 PREFERRED       PREFERRED          PREFERRED       PREFERRED        PREFERRED       PREFERRED
                           CAPITAL TRUST IV  FUNDING IV,L.P.  CAPITAL TRUST IV  FUNDING IV,L.P.  CAPITAL TRUST IV  FUNDING IV, L.P.
                           ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ----------------

<S>                        <C>                 <C>            <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>

Earnings                       $ 29,361           $ 34,306        $ 29,361           $ 34,432         $ 29,361            $ 34,424
                               ========           ========        ========           ========         ========            ========


Fixed charges                  $      -           $      -        $      -           $      -         $      -            $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution
 requirements                    28,480             29,361          28,480             29,361           28,480              29,361
                               --------           --------        --------           --------         --------            --------

Total combined fixed
 charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirements                  $ 28,480           $ 29,361          28,480           $ 29,361         $ 28,480            $ 29,361
                               ========           ========        ========           ========         ========            ========

Ratio of earnings to
 combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements         1.03               1.17            1.03               1.17             1.03                1.17


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-50090 Conference Calendar

__________________ GLEN C. JAMES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus STATE OF TEXAS; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-95-CV-1272
- - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Glen C. James, a Texas state prisoner, sued the State of Texas and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice alleging that the defendants violated his rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb-2000bb-4, by adopting Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 498.0045 (West Supp. 1996). The district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that James' RFRA claims were frivolous. See Hicks v. Garner , 69No. 96-50090 -2- F.3d 22, 25 (5th Cir. 1995); see James v. Texas , No. SA-95-CA1272 (W.D. Tex. Jan. 26, 1996). This appeal is frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2. James is cautioned than any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, James is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING.
Exhibit 10.32


 


ASSURED
GUARANTY LTD.


 


DESCRIPTION
OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CASH COMPENSATION


 


FOR 2005


 


Set
forth below are the 2005 annual salary and bonus of the Chief Executive Officer
and each of the four most highly compensated Executive Officers. The salary of
each Executive Officer listed below are unchanged for 2006.


 


Dominic J. Frederico


 


President and Chief Executive Officer, Assured Guaranty Ltd.


 


	
  Salary

  	
   

  	
  Bonus

  	
   

  
	
  $

  	
  700,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  2,000,000

  	
   

  
						



 


Robert B. Mills


 


Chief Financial Officer, Assured Guaranty Ltd.


 


	
  Salary

  	
   

  	
  Bonus

  	
   

  
	
  $

  	
  500,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  775,000

  	
   

  
						



 


Michael J. Schozer


 


President, Assured Guaranty Corp.


 


	
  Salary

  	
   

  	
  Bonus

  	
   

  
	
  $

  	
  375,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  725,000

  	
   

  
						



 


James M. Michener


 


General Counsel, Assured Guaranty Ltd.


 


	
  Salary

  	
   

  	
  Bonus

  	
   

  
	
  $

  	
  375,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  600,000

  	
   

  
						



 


Robert A. Bailenson


 


Chief Accounting Officer, Assured Guaranty Ltd.


 


	
  Salary

  	
   

  	
  Bonus

  	
   

  
	
  $

  	
  300,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  260,000

  	
   

  
						



 

















 


Messrs. Frederico, Mills and Michener have
employment agreements with the Company and are entitled to certain perquisites,
such as housing allowance, family travel benefit, car allowance, reimbursement
of U.S. social security and Medicare taxes, financial and tax planning and club
dues. Mr. Schozer is also a party to an employment agreement with Assured
Guaranty Corp. and is entitled to certain perquisites, such as financial and
tax planning and club dues.


 


The CEO and other Executive Officers are also
participants in defined contribution pension plans maintained by the Company
and its subsidiaries.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41052 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE GUADALUPE GOMEZ-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:06-CR-90-1

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Guadalupe Gomez-Gonzalez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHANNEY VELWOOD, 

 Appellant 

v. No. 06-15-00161-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

 Appellee 

 SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: 

 COMES NOW Appellant Shanney Velwood, by and through her undersigned 

counsel, and pursuant to Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, 

respectfully moves for a second extension of time to file her brief in this cause. 

 In support, Appellant submits the following: 

 I

 After a jury trial, Appellant was convicted on May 20, 2015 in Cause No. 42474, 

424th Judicial District Court, Burnet County, Texas of the offense of possession of a 

controlled substance. After she was sentenced, she filed a timely motion for new trial 

that was subsequently overruled by operation of law. Thereafter, on August 10, 

2015, she filed timely notice of appeal. 

 II

 After the Clerk’s Record and the Court Reporter’s Record had been filed, this 

ACCEPTED

06-15-00161-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

12/14/2015 2:28:14 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 12/14/2015 2:28:14 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
Court set the deadline for Appellant’s Brief, which was due to be filed on or before 

November 12, 5015. This Court, however, granted a motion for extension of time 

until December 14, 2015 based on the illness of undersigned counsel.

 

 III

 

 Undersigned counsel sought medical attention, and has largely recovered. In the 

interim, however, counsel fell behind on all his work, including numerous writs of 

habeas corpus. In addition, counsel’s only brother has been hospitalized with 

dementia after an apparent suicide attempt, and counsel has been trying to make 

arrangements for his treatment. Because of these reasons, counsel needs a short 

extension of time to complete the brief in this cause.

 IV

 This is Appellant’s second motion for extension of time. Appellant asks only that 

she be given a seven-day extension of time. Undersigned counsel, a former briefing 

attorney, fully understands the Court’s desire to expedite the resolution of criminal 

cases, and files this motion only out of necessity.

 Respectfully submitted,

 

 /s/ Terrence W. Kirk

 Terrence W. Kirk

 State Bar No. 11513500

 1504 West Avenue

Austin, Texas 78701

 (512) 236-8511

 (512) 474-8252 (Fax)
 

 

 

 

 

 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I certify that a true and correct copy of this motion was emailed to Mr. Gary W. 

Bunyard, Assitant District Attorney, at g.bunyard@co.llano.tx.us, on this the 14th

Day of December, 2015.

 /s/ Terrence W. Kirk
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             -----------------------
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             -----------------------
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                             ----------------------
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

      In connection with the Report of Integrated Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period from January 1, 2005 to December 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the period indicated.

      This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


      Dated: July 28, 2006         By:  /s/ Bruce Mogel
                                         -------------------------
                                         Bruce Mogel
                                         Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)**

I, Jiujiu Jiang, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Qiao Xing Universal Resources, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of thecompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: July 15, 2011
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Finity Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I John
A. Courter, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         *1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         *2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                              /s/ John A. Courter
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              John A. Courter



*        The foregoing certification relates to a registrant which has ceased
operations and has assets as of December 31, 2002 consisting solely of cash in
the amount of $4,248.00. Accordingly, the registrant has no disclosure controls
and procedures or internal controls and procedures with respect to which
conclusions about, or an evaluation of, effectiveness or significant changes
thereof can be disclosed as required by Item 307 of Regulation S-B.
Fourth  Amendment of the Sky Financial Group Profit Sharing, 401(K) and ESOP



 Exhibit 10.29 
  
 FOURTH
AMENDMENT 
 OF THE 
 SKY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. PROFIT SHARING, 401(K) AND ESOP
PLAN 
 (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2004) 
  
 WHEREAS, Sky Financial
Group, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Sky Financial Group, Inc. Profit Sharing, 401(k) and ESOP Plan (the “Plan”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company has delegated authority to amend the Plan to the Sky Financial Group, Inc.
Benefit Plans Committee (the “Committee”), and the Committee has determined that amendment of the Plan is necessary and desirable. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power reserved to the Company by Section 10.01 of the
Plan, and by virtue of the authority delegated to the Committee, the Plan, as previously amended, is hereby further amended, in the following particulars: 
  
 1.      By inserting the phrase “anniversary awards, prizes,” after the phrase “moving
expenses,” where it appears in Section 1.03(d) of the Plan, effective as of January 1, 2004. 
  
 2.      By substituting the following for the first sentence of Section 5.04 of the Plan, effective March 27, 2005: 
  
 “If a Participant terminates employment
with the Employers, and the value of the Participant’s vested Accounts is not (or at the time of any prior, periodic distribution was not) greater than $1,000, the Participant will receive a distribution of the value of the entire vested
portion of his or her Accounts and the nonvested portion will be treated as a forfeiture.” 
  
 3.      By substituting the following for the second sentence of Section 6.01 of the Plan, effective March 27, 2005: 
  
 “If the nonforfeitable portion of the
Participant’s Account exceeds (or at the time of any prior, periodic distribution ever exceeded) $1,000, the Plan shall 







 not distribute the Participant’s Account before the Participant attains Normal
Retirement Date, unless the Participant consents to such distribution in writing.” 
  
 4.      By substituting the following for the second paragraph of Section 6.01 of the Plan, effective March 27, 2005: 
  
 “Subject to the rules in Section 6.03,
the surviving spouse shall begin to receive payments immediately, unless such surviving spouse elects a later date, except that the surviving spouse shall receive an immediate distribution if the value of the Participant’s vested Accounts is
not (or at the time of any prior, periodic distribution was not) greater than $1,000.” 
  
 *        *        * 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, on behalf of the Committee, the
undersigned Committee member has executed this amendment this 30th day of December 2004. 
  

			
	 SKY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

	 BENEFIT PLANS COMMITTEE

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Thomas A. Sciorilli

	 Its:
	 	 SVP & Chief Human Resources Officer



  
  
  

 - 2 -
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18

U.S.C. SECTION
1350

The undersigned, Terry Davis, is the Chief Financial Officer of Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc. (the Company).

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2005, as amended (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | C) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | D) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement
will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed
to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|             |  |                
|------------ |  | ---------------
|May 19, 2006 |  | /s/ Terry Davis
|Dated        |  | Terry Davis