alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### McCOWAN et al. v. BOND et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 30, 1952.

Fritz Krueger, Somerset, for appellants.

Lewis & Weaver, London, J. R. Llewellyn, McKee, for appellees.

CLAY, Commissioner.

This appeal is from a judgment restraining the County Judge of Jackson County and others from proceeding to establish a county road. Appellants’ contention is that in effect the judgment constituted a writ of prohibition which the circuit court was unauthorized to issue.

On August 27, 1947, the appellant plaintiffs filed an ex parte petition in the Jackson county court to establish a public pass-way as a county road. This action appears to have ¡been taken in conformity with the provisions of KRS 178.080. The next day a notice was published in the local newspaper to the effect that a hearing would be had on this petition September 6. On September 3, appellees, being owners of the land involved and other interested parties, petitioned the Jackson circuit court and obtained a temporary restraining order against the plaintiffs and the County Judge. This temporary order was subsequently made permanent 'by the judgment appealed from.

We are unable to comprehend on what conceivable ground appellees were entitled to have the Jackson county court restrained from proceeding in a matter over which it is plainly given jurisdiction by the statute, KRS 178.080. It seems to be appel-lees’ theory that the interested parties had not 'been served with notice of the proceedings, but the statute does not require notice at the time the action is commenced. Appellees assert that the proceedings in the county court were “absolutely void,” but for what reason is not shown.

The only steps taken in the county court were the filing of a petition and the publication of an unrequired general notice. After the appointment of “viewers”, the County Judge may have decided that the road should not be established. If so-, there would have been no reason to serve appel-lees with process or to hear their objections.

This seems to- be a simply a case in which the potential defendants in a lawsuit attempt to disrupt orderly judicial procedure by going into an equity court to enjoin proceedings properly commenced in a court of law. In the present case the appellant plaintiffs had a legal right to petition the Jackson county court. That court had full jurisdiction of the subject matter and the power to proceed as provided by statute. *537When appellees filed their suit for an injunction, none of their rights had 'been invaded, and any objection they may have had to the establishment of the county road could be properly presented in the county court action. From an adverse judgment there, they could appeal to the circuit court and then to this Court under KRS 178.100. Appellees clearly had an adequate remedy at law, and therefore the injunction should not have been granted.

The judgment is reversed with directions to dismiss appellees’ petition.
#### GARDNER v. STATE.

No. 22235.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 28, 1942.

E. J. McLeroy, of Center, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Upon appellant’s plea of guilty before the court — all formalities of the statute being complied with — he was convicted of cattle theft and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

No bills of exception or statement of facts are found in the record, in which condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 25 (Monday, February 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 5884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-2699]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NM-932-1430-ET; NMNM 42909, et al.]


Public Land Order No. 7416; Revocation of Executive Orders Dated 
June 24, 1914, April 28, 1917, February 11, 1918, July 10, 1919, May 
25, 1921, and February 7, 1930, and Partial Revocation of Executive 
Order Dated April 17, 1926; New Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order corrects Public Land Order No. 7416, 65 FR 67295-
67297, published December 1, 1999, as FR Doc. 99-31202. .
    On page 67297, in the first column, under T. 24 S., R. 15 W., 
remove sec. 5, lot 1 and SE\1/4\NE\1/4\, and after T. 24 S., R. 15 W., 
sec. 23, NE\1/4\NW\1/4\, add T. 24 S., R. 15 E., sec. 5, lot 1 and 
SE\1/2\NE\1/4\.

    Dated: January 28, 2000.
Carsten F. Goff,
Deputy State Director.
[FR Doc. 00-2699 Filed 2-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
Exhibit 32.1

                         Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp
                         -------------------------------


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, each hereby
certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of their knowledge:

               1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

               2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.



                                         By:  /s/  Harold K. Fletcher
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                   Harold K. Fletcher
                                                   CEO

                                              /s/  Joseph P. Macaluso
                                              ---------------------------------
                                                   Joseph P. Macaluso
                                                   Principal Accounting Officer

                                              February 13, 2009

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp and will be retained by
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6638
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM C. BREWSTER, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 98-6964
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM C. BREWSTER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-143-5, CA-97-303-4)2 Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William C. Brewster, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: William C. Brewster seeks to appeal two district court orders dismissing his claims and denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brewster , Nos. CR-95-143-5; CA-97-303-4 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 6, 1998; June 19, 1998). We further deny Brewster’s motion for bail pending appeal asmoot, and his motion for the preparation of transcripts at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

                         Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp
                         -------------------------------


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tel-Instrument  Electronics Corp
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with
the  Securities  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates  indicated  below,  each hereby
certify,  pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of their knowledge:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.



 August 14, 2009                             By:  /s/  Harold K. Fletcher
                                                -----------------------------
                                                       Harold K. Fletcher
                                                       CEO


                                               /s/  Joseph P. Macaluso
                                               ------------------------------
                                                    Joseph P. Macaluso
                                                    Principal Accounting Officer



     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Tel-Instrument  Electronics  Corp  and will be  retained  by
Tel-Instrument  Electronics  Corp and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2898 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to modify the composition of the 

southern judicial district of Mississippi, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2013 

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi (for himself, Mr. HARPER, and Mr. PALAZZO) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to modify the composition of the southern judicial district of Mississippi, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Division Realignment 

5 Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REALIGNMENT OF SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MIS7 SISSIPPI. 

8 Section 104(b) of title 28, United States Code, is 

9 amended to read as follows: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2898 IH

1 ‘‘Southern District 

2 ‘‘(b) The southern district comprises four divisions. 

3 ‘‘(1) The Northern Division comprises the coun4 ties of Copiah, Hinds, Holmes, Issaquena, Kemper, 

5 Lauderdale, Leake, Madison, Neshoba, Newton, 

6 Noxubee, Rankin, Scott, Simpson, Sharkey, Smith, 

7 Warren, and Yazoo. 

8 Court for the Northern Division shall be held at Jackson. 

9 ‘‘(2) The Southern Division comprises the coun10 ties of George, Greene, Hancock, Harrison, Jackson, 

11 Pearl River, and Stone. 

12 Court for the Southern Division shall be held at Gulfport. 

13 ‘‘(3) The Eastern Division comprises the coun14 ties of Clarke, Covington, Forrest, Jasper, Jefferson 

15 Davis, Jones, Lamar, Lawrence, Marion, Perry, 

16 Wayne, and Walthall. 

17 Court for the Eastern Division shall be held at Hatties18 burg. 

19 ‘‘(4) The Western Division comprises the coun20 ties of Adams, Amite, Claiborne, Franklin, Jeffer21 son, Lincoln, Pike, and Wilkinson. 

22 Court for the Western Division shall be held at Natchez.’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2898 IH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 This Act and the amendment made by this Act shall 

3 take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The State, ex rel. Mullen, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio.

(No. 27627

Decided November 15, 1939.)

*46
      *Mr. Alexander Mints,*for relatrix.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. E. P. Felker,*for respondent.

By the Court.

It is contended in the brief for the relatrix that the Industrial Commission should have taken the date of the last accident (May 6, 1931) as it was the more probable cause of the injury resulting in “the disease and death” and that she is entitled to receive the most favorable possible interpretation of the question as a matter of law.

Mandamus will lie to compel the exercise of discretion but not to control it unless there be an abuse of discretion. *State, ex rel. Baker,*v. *Hanefeld, Dir.,*134 Ohio St., 540, 18 N. E. (2d), 404.

Although it is alleged that the Industrial Commission exercised its discretion in an arbitrary fashion, there are no allegations in the petition sufficient to support the conclusion that the commission abused its discretion in adopting the date of the first “accident” in computing compensation.

The demurrer will be sustained and leave will be given relatrix to plead further.

*Demurrer*sustained.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, "Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT  99.4


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report (the "Report") on the Form 10-QSB of
Standard Capital Corporation (the "Company") for the three months ended November
30,  2004,  as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof,  I,  B. Gordon Brooke, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer
and  Director,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge  and  belief:

1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
     or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The  information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
     material  respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.


Date:  October 24, 2005
                                       /s/  "B. Gordon Brooke"
                                     ---------------------------
                                        B. Gordon Brooke
                                   Chief Accounting Officer
                             Chief  Financial  Officer  and  Director
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of Flagship Global Health,
        Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the
        Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
        “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
        15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Fred F. NazemFred
                F. NazemChief Executive OfficerDate: April 2, 2007
Request for Information FAA-2015-0021 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Zollinger:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition for amendment 

dated July 1, 2015 (Docket No. FAA-2015-0021). This information is necessary for the Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition. 

z In your amendment to exemption 11338, dated February 24, 2016 you “seek to add the use of a 

magnetometer to a UAS platform.” Your amendment also requested the addition of 200 

additional UAS. Of the 200 aircraft requested, please identify which aircraft you wish to operate 

with a magnetometer.

z Of the 200 aircraft listed for addition to your existing grant of exemption, all but the RMAX 

appear to weigh less than 55 pounds with payload. Commercial operations of UAS weighing less 

than 55 pounds can now be conducted under 14 CFR part 107, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, 

with less restrictions than those imposed under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and 

Reform Act (FMRA) (PL 112-95). Please state if you wish to operate the UAS weighing less than 

55 pounds under 14 CFR part 107, or under Section 333 of the FMRA. 

z Three of the aircraft listed for addition to your existing grant of exemption appear to be for 

agricultural use. Please state whether or not you intend to conduct agricultural aircraft operations 

(AAO) (spraying of economic poisons) under 14 CFR, part 137.

z One of the aircraft listed for addition to your existing grant of exemption is the Yamaha RMAX. 

Please provide a detailed description of the RMAX aircraft design and configuration focusing on 

the UAS features and flight characteristics to include, but not limited to:

{ 3D view with detailed scale drawings of the aircraft and any launch and recovery equipment 

if applicable

{ Operational history with supporting statistics

{ Copies of RMAX manuals to include flight operations, maintenance, repair, and agricultural 

aircraft operations if dispensing chemicals, or water

z Any other information to support operational safety with UAS in excess of 55 pounds.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov.

Once your information is submitted, please save your tracking number and submit your tracking number

along with the information submitted to the docket, and any proprietary information electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the 

information described above by 11/22/16. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket 

without notifying you further.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 9:18 AM 

To: rzoll710@aol.com

Request for Information FAA-2015-0021 Page 1 of 1

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note... 11/8/2016
Exhibit
99.6





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of YM BioSciences Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
40-F for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David G.P. Allan, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




By:
              /s/ David G.P. AllanDavid
      G.P. AllanChief
      Executive Officer




September
24, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           58202
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           48128
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                192357
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     903046
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        1531742
<ALLOWANCE>                                      47210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4055560
<DEPOSITS>                                     2133552
<SHORT-TERM>                                    484665
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             294516
<LONG-TERM>                                     438010
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       1010
<COMMON>                                           278
<OTHER-SE>                                      603529
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 4055560
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  49386
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                26479
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  6289
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 82154
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               27157
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               47755
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            34399
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    11399
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               10914
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  95929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  27754
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       17069
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     17069
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.96
<LOANS-NON>                                      49268
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 41847
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     7611
<RECOVERIES>                                      1575
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                47210
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             47210
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>